HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0853.036 2012-2014 TO: COUNTY OF HAWAI'I AND STATE OF HAWAI'I
RESOLUTION NO. 308-12
SITUATED AT PAPAIKOU,DISTRICT OF SOUTH HILO,TO PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN
PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT TO THE BEACH AT PAPAIKOU.
IN the absence of my King, His Majesty Kamehameha III, and in accordance and
harmony with the Constitution of the Kingdom of Hawai'i the Statute Laws of His Majesty,
the foregoing message of delivery is hereby sanctioned under its jurisdiction.
That I, Keokinamauuli i, Keli i o ko Hawai'i Pae Aina, one of the surviving, of akua
do issue this message of delivery, On Behalf Of His Majesty, and give public notice of the
same, granted of this_day of November two thousand and twelve.
And, I, Keokinamauulii, hereby affirm that I am Competent and declare that:
(1.) I am the individual making this affirmation;
(2.) I am Loyalty and Subject of the Kingdom of Hawai'i(Aupuni o Hawai'i).
(3.) I am of lawful age to make my decision (manao hoo holo)
(4.) I am a Free (hookuakahi) individual raised as a Kanaka male(kane)
(5.) I have, up hold by trusting(hilina i) my Creator(Akua) and process only truthfulness
spiritually laws of this kingdom which was created originally.
(6.) To anyone, who are not derivative origin, and are secondary to the laws, of the
kingdom without authority by the kanaka, which continuing acting like provisional
government without proper consent, is in violation of 1840 Constitution, 1846 Statutes
Laws, 1825 Treaties. Nor, the governor of the state who take part as "Paren Patriae" as
parents of the" kanaka race"of this kingdom, is Null and Void.
I, would like to introduce myself my inoa is Keokinamauuli'i, of this Kingdom of
Hawai'i. The authority was giving to me by a Keali'i Kiionakalaionaonakealiipoiniholoheao,
Keali'i o ko Hawai'i Pae Aina, 0 Moku Puni 0 Hawai'i. Now lets get to the issue of
concern . Resolution no. 308-12 The County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, Corporate of
Papaikou Landing Inc., and James Waugh of Canada, and wife Charlene Prickett,
claiming to own this particular parcel of Papaikou Ahupua' a.
Comm. N S3 j�
Ref. To: �r(AnA4 L
Ref. Date NOV 0 9 2012
My question is did the C. Brewer Company Mauna kea sugar Co. John Cross sell
this portion of land to you the market buyers?That would very interesting! If so, I would like
to see your original title? clear title? Quiet title or, void title? The argument was access to
the ocean. Which later on, with the negotiation with the county council, you the claim
owners, asked the county if they can rerouted the access to another location in this
particular kuleana on the upperside side of the highway of Papaikou Ahupua'a, to the
kekai area to the mill. On this two different location of Papaikou area is L.C. Aw.
112115:1, and other holder of Pu'ueo paku is L..C. Aw. 7715:16 this is the title holders.
Chiefess and their families with undivided interest, until today, direct or lineal of their
genealogy,they have an interest.
You, the corporation, corporate and claim owners are in violation of the Statute
Laws of His Majesty King Kamehameha III. In accordance to and reference of Chapter V.
Statute Laws of Subjects and Foreigners. Section IV., Page 76, All aliens shall, as in Great
Britain and the United States of America, continue to be under the following disabilities:
3.They are not able to acquire any allodial or fee simple estate in lands.
I, Keokinamauuli'i, oppose, any preoccupied holding of your establishment. How
and what authority you Corporation of the County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, Corporate of
Papaikou Landing Inc., and, owner James Waugh, wife Charlene Prickett and who are
involved in resolution no. 308-12 to provide a pedestrian public access easement to the
beach at Papaikou. I, disagree to all this matter of your claim as owners. Proved to me your
legitimated clear and, original title. Which the property was fence and blockage or buried
kage around where you claim to own. That, alanui kahiko exist before you lived there. The
kanawai must be open at all time, with permission with the original heirs with undivided
interest.
In accordance to the Statute Laws of His Majesty the King Kamehameha III., In
reference to Article II.-Of the disposition of Government Lands. Section VII. "Land so
patented shall never revert to the king of these islands, nor escheat to this government, for
any other cause than attainder of high treason, as defined in the criminal code, nor be
diverted from the patentee or his assigns, except by operation of law under sale in virtue of
a judicial decree, or for the non-payment of taxes as prescribed in the third part of this act,
or for the utter default of heirs of the testate or intestate owners, being Hawaiian subjects,
as in the fifth part of this act prescribed; but the patented lands shall descend to lineal or
collateral heirs, being Hawaiians, of the patentee and his assigns, as tenants in common,
unless otherwise prescribed by the will of a testate patentee."
NOW, since you the County of Hawaii being part of the complainers, to take part in
private property for public use by the county, as eminent domain. And, negotiating which
with some kind of agreement with the owners to rerouted the access to the ocean, I
disagree. Remember you cannot violate kanaka laws. And my konohiki rights cannot be
Infringed upon as a kanaka, to an secondary or outsider? I have genealogy to prove my
interest to this particular area. This ahupua'a is open to the one with undivided interest, that
can proved their genealogy. And, I have an interest. If I become an injured party than
remedy and recourse will be filed later.
I, hold you and your corporation and, corporate and, owners personally liable for any
and all injuries imposed to or upon my person.
Ily
Kee uulii
Kelii o ko Hawai'i Pae Aina