HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0271a.072 2012-2014 Page 1 of 1
Murashige, Laura
From: Goldstein, Cindy [cindy.goldstein @pioneer.com]
1013 AUG -6
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2013 12:09 AM 9:
To: counciltestimony @co.hawaii.hi.us
Subject: Testimony in Opposition Bill 79
Attachments: DuPont Pioneer Bill 79_Testimony_August_2013.docx
Cindy Goldstein
DuPont Pioneer
Industry Relations Manager, Hawaii
office: 808-637-0100 ext 117
cell: 808-722-7819
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by
return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless explicitly
and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended", this e-mail does
not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment, or an acceptance
of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute a consent to the
use of sender's contact information for direct marketing purposes or for
transfers of data to third parties.
The dupont.com web address will continue in use for a
transitional period for communications sent or received on behalf of DuPont
Performance Coatings., which is not affiliated in any way with the DuPont Company.
Francais Deutsch Italiano Espanol Portugues Japanese Chinese Korean
http://www.DuPont.com/corp/email_disclaimer.html
Comm. N :7Z,
Z,
Ref. To: ?/ M1t.
U 0 2 2013
8/6/2013
_ Cindy Goldstein, Ph. D
lu pp Government and Industry Relations Manager
DuPont Pioneer
Waialua Parent Seed, Kekaha Parent Seed
A\ PIONEER, Kunia Research Center, Waimea Research
PO Box 520
Waialua, HI 96791
Hawai'i County Council o n
Hawai'i County Building 4J °c'
25 Aupuni Street c
Hilo, Hawai'i 96720
c • D�
Bill 79 — Relating Genetically Modified Organisms
August 6, 2013 P1
.=
Position: Opposed to Bill 79
Council Chair Yoshimoto, Committee Chair Ford, and members of the Hawai'i County
Council,
My name is Dr. Cindy Goldstein and I am providing testimony on behalf of DuPont
Pioneer. We support all types of agriculture; conventional, organic and biotech. This bill
has the potential to negatively impact agriculture on the Big Island in the near term and
for future generations of farmers, consumers, and agriculture researchers.
A number of provisions of Bill 79 would make it difficult for farmers that already face a
number of challenges and high costs of production to have the array of tools available
that enable farming to be stable and economically viable. The prohibitions section of
the bill suggest imminent endangerment to agricultural health. The many pests and
diseases that are currently found, and that may arrive as invasive species to the Island
of Hawai'i have been shown to create significant and imminent danger to crops, at
times spreading rapidly and posing a threat to crops. Removing tools that researchers
and farmers can use as one of the ways to respond to a new pest or disease epidemic
is short sighted and may lead to the loss of economically viable farming for many on the
Big Island.
This bill describes the current system for growing genetically engineered crops as
posing a potential health hazard. This has not been the conclusion of the hundreds of
peer reviewed; scientifically sound research studies that have been carried out over
many years. Scientific studies build upon one another to form a body of evidence. The
body of evidence of data for genetically engineered crops, and meta analysis of the
large body of scientific data and studies in the US, Europe, Japan, and other nations
continues to point to a strong body of evidence that growing and consuming these
crops, and foods derived from these crops, are safe.
The decision to issue permits for planting of transgenic organisms on farms, in
greenhouses, and by research institutions is made by federal agencies and the Hawai'i
Department of Agriculture, not private companies as stated in this bill. Permits are
issued following assessment and evaluation of many of the factors listed as reasons for
calling for the adoption of this bill. Once permits for planting are issued, there is
oversight that includes inspections and additional compliance with regulatory processes.
Provisions of this bill would be redundant, as current agency regulation and active
oversight already address the safeguards proposed as justifications for this bill.
While the precautionary principle would seem like a reasonable and practical approach
to evaluate and develop sound policy, when applied, the unintended consequences are
significant. Innovation and technology we use and take for granted in our daily lives
would be curtailed in many ways if standards of the precautionary principle were in use.
Automobiles would not be allowed considering the dangers they pose and airplanes that
bring residents and visitors to the Big Island would raise concerns significant enough to
call for an outright ban. There have been many large widely reported, and small but
equally deadly outbreaks of Salmonella and E. coli on raw fruits and vegetables, leafy
greens, meat, and other food products that would raise alarms due to impacts on
children, adults and the immune compromised individuals that would disallow making
these products available to Big Island consumers when scrutinized under the
precautionary principle.
Provisions for registration will make the affected farms and research facilities future
targets for destruction of property and crops. The farmers themselves and employees
engaged in work in registered facilities will be targeted for harassment and unfortunately
also threatened on social media sites as we see already when people present a
viewpoint in support of genetically engineered crops, and subject to harassment and
as they go about their daily activities.
We oppose this bill because of the many negative consequences this bill would have for
Big Island farmers, agriculture researchers, consumers, and future farmers.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit testimony in opposition to Bill 79.