Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PWC 042 (D2) 09/10/1985 1984-1988 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC WORKS DATE: September 10 , 1985 PLACE: Councilroom TIME: 10:00 a.m. Chairman and Members Hawaii County Council Hilo, Hawaii Your Committee on Public Works, to which was referred - Communication 132 relating to a sign variance request , reports as follows: Communication 132 from Architect Ronald H. Nagata is a request for a sign variance for the roof signs of the Safeway and Longs stores in the Prince Kuhio Shopping Plaza. The Longs sign has an area of 128 square feet and is 4' x32 ' . The Safeway sign has an area of 120 square feet and is 4 'x30 ' . The applicant, in requesting this variance , submits that because of the size of the shopping center and the distance of the buildings from the highway, a 32 square foot sign, as allowed by ordinance , would appear visually insignificant and work a hardship upon both Safeway and Longs . Your Committee on Public Works has received written comments from both the Departments of Planning (Communication 132.1 ) and Public Works (Communication 132. 2) . Both departments in their review have recommended denial of the variance . Your Committee has received additional testimony from Mr . Ronald H. Nagata to the effect that the Longs and Safeway signs , as originally planned some 5 years ago , were within the legal limits of the County Code . Because of construction cost escalations over the years , certain cost cutting modifications were made to the construction plans for Longs and Safeway. Among these modifications was the removal of a roof canopy and wall which provided support to the Safeway and Longs signs . These signs, which have not changed in size or location are now being supported with a frame on the roof . Because of this change, these signs are now considered roof signs and do not conform to the code . The Committee has also reviewed and considered public statements and communications on this variance request which were received by the full Council on August 21, 1985 and referred to this Committee as Communication 287 . Your Committee has requested and received testimony from the Corporation Counsel clarifying that the Council may grant a variance to the sign ordinance when the Council finds that hardship exists and when the granting of a variance would not be contrary to the spirit and purpose of the sign ordinance . PWC REPORT 0 , 42 (D2) ADOPTED : OCT 2 1985 Your Committee on Public Works remains divided on the issuance of a variance to Longs and Safeway. The majority of its members are sensitive to: 1 . The applicant 's initial construction plans which proposed moderately sized wall signs 2 . The applicant 's revision of the project, because of economics , which caused these same Longs and Safeway signs to be defined as roof signs . 3 . The desire of the applicants to each erect similar type signs for harmony, aesthetics , and design consistency. 4. An appreciation that a 32 sq. foot roof sign would not be adequate and such a 32 square foot sign would appear out of proportion. 5 . The buildings ' location approximately 1200 feet from the major thoroughfare Kanoelehua Avenue . 6 . The very remote prospect of Puainako becoming a major thoroughfare to the airport within the next decade or two . 7 . The applicants need to adequately identify and establish themselves at the shopping center complex and contribute to a positive business interrelationships for the plaza and the County of Hawaii . Your Committee on Public Works, with a vote of three ayes and two noes , finds sufficient hardship on behalf of applicants and recommends that the Council approve the sign variance for Safeway and Longs . Aroi MERL' K. LAI, C.TORP770MAN � � LL RUSSELL KOKUBUN, VICE CHAIRMAN FRANK DE LUZ, III, MEMBER 440-Ofle- ft.TAKASHI DOMINGO, MEM ROBERT HERKES, MEMBER LA/GM