HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0343.022 2012-2014 1
Murashige, Laura �,✓I�� �i 54
From: toni withington [sundownertoni @yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 9:54 AM
To: counciltestimony @co.hawaii.hi.us
Subject: Res. 140 13 Kohala Kai LLC Grant of Easement
Attachments: Kohala Kai council test..doc
Attached is my written testimony for the above item on the Finance Committee Agenda for Dec. 3.
mahalo, Toni Withington
o
c)
C-,
Comm.No, 3�''3' ��
Ref.To: r/iG
Ref.Data. EL 4 1 U13
12/3/2013
Resolution No. 140 13
Hawaii County Council Finance Committee
Kohala Kai LLC Grant of Public Easement
December 3, 2013
Testimony of Toni Withington
Hawi, Hawai'i
This document is flawed. It violates the County's public trust and needs to
be re-drafted. It was drawn up with almost no public input. Through delays and
manipulations of the Planning Department Rules and Regulations, the County has
managed to diminish rather than enhance the public's rights along the
coast. The precedent it could set is a major blow to public access rights. I believe
these problems can be worked out through negotiation.
Fourteen years ago a five-lot subdivision was proposed for the land now
owned by Kohala Kai LLC. Because the estimated cost of improvements was
declared to be below $120,000 the County granted a Minor SMA Permit. No public
hearing was required. Owners were told to submit a public access plan within 6
months of the Dec. 1999 permit. Now the subdivision is 11 lots. The infrastructure
alone is estimated by the owner to cost $4.5 million. The Planning Department
restricted public discussion to one public hearing and did not uphold the
recommendations of the North Kohala Community Development Plan.
The private project has grown, but the public access
originally proposed has been cut back.
The historic Ala Loa is to be turned into a private golf cart road:
Instead of locating the public trail on the historic Ala Loa, as is recommended
by the North Kohala Community Development Plan, the Planning Department has
authorized modification of the Ala Loa into a private golf cart path for lot owners
and guests leading to an authorized private clubhouse near the only cove on the
property. The public will be walking on an owner- constructed trail seaward of the
cart path.
The size of the easement:
From 1999 to April 2013 all documents associated with the public access
easements at Kohala Kai describe them as being 20 feet wide. The Grant of
Easement before you is for 10-foot-wide easements.
Who maintains the trails:
From 1999 to April 2013 all documents indicated the developer would construct and
the subdivision would maintain the public trails. The Grant of Easement before you
says the County shall maintain both public trails.
Parking is a long dangerous walk away from the mauka-makai trail:
From 1999 to April 2013 all documents have described the required public parking
as being "in close proximity to the mauka end of the mauka-makai trail." The
Grant of Easement before you has the public walking 160 feet on the skirt of a
high-speed highway and another 200 feet on a trail along the highway before
reaching the trailhead to the ocean.
Trail description downgraded:
The April 2013 draft of the Public Access Plan describes the trails as "a minimum 6-
foot wide walking area with a graded earthen surface to allow reasonable
pedestrian passage." One month later May 2013 the trails are to be "a cleared or
constructed earthen surface."
Access to historic sites and burial eliminated:
The State Historic Preservation Division in 2000 wrote: "Public access must be
ensured to enable the public to see the sites" and burials that were to be
preserved. No mention of this public right is identified in the Grant of Easement.
Recommendations of the North Kohala Community Development Plan
ignored:
Planning Department overlooked the recommendation of the NKCDP to put coastal
trails on the Ala Loa or traditional trails where possible. Nor did the department
consult or share documents with the NKCDP subcommittee on public access.
Did the County's actions meet State law regarding public participation in
Public access decisions?
The Special Management Area permit applications (SMA Minor Permit No. 84
and SMA Major Permit 06-10) Both state that the project will meet the objectives
and policies as provided by Chapter 205A of State law which says: (Quoting from
the above applications) "Communicate the potential short and long-term impacts of
proposed significant coastal developments early in their life cycle and in terms
understandable to the public to facilitate public participation in the planning and
review process." It is my view that the County failed to do this, and should now
do it right.
I believe the interested parties in North and South Kohala are willing to work
with the land owner and County to iron out these differences.
Here are the details of the above statements:
The historic Ala Loa is to be turned into a private golf cart road
Despite evidence in department files, including three maps, indicating that the
traditional jeep road along the coast is the Ala Loa, the Planning Director on Feb 25, 2013
accepted the location of the public access trail as constructed by the landowner seaward of
the Ala Loa. A Planning Department communication says "Trail construction was done
without prior review and approval by the PD."
The North Kohala Community Development Plan, Ordinance 08-151, adopted
November 2008, states that the coastal trail from Pololu to Kawaihae "should follow the Ala
Loa where it can be identified or traditional fishing trails."
Even before the Public Access Plan was approved in May, Kohala Kai was granted use
of the Ala Loa alignment for a golf cart path to be used by owners and guests in a letter
dated March 6, 2013. Two months later on May 23, 2013 the director approved the
construction of a "private community building and recreational canoe shed" along the golf
cart path near the cove used by locals for fishing and swimming. The private clubhouse will
have a kitchen, restrooms, showers, an outdoor barbecue area and a covered lanai. The
canoe shed will "store the Project lot owners' outdoor recreational equipment."
The size of the easement:
The Special Management Area (SMA) permit applications, dated November 1, 1999,
June 14, 2002 and Jan. 31, 2008 as well as the Land Court maps submitted with the SMA
dated as recently as Aug. 19,2011 describe the mauka-makai and lateral trail easements as
being 20-foot wide. SMA Minor Permit No. 84 says "A 20-foot wide easement for a lateral
public pedestrian shoreline access is being provided. The lateral public access has been
delineated within the 40-foot shoreline setback area of the property and extends the entire
ocean frontage." SMA Major Permit No 06-10 says: "From the northwestern boundary of
the property, the mauka-makai pedestrian access will be located within a 20-foot wide
"Public Pedestrian Access" easement. Along the shoreline the pedestrian access will be
located within the property's 40-foot shoreline setback area in a 20-foot wide "public
pedestrian access" easement." The Land Court Map shows both trails (Easement F) as
being 20 feet wide.
The Public Access Plan, submitted to Planning Department in April 2013 and
accepted by the department in May 2013 (with revisions) describes the mauka-makai and
lateral trails as "A public pedestrian access easement on existing trail (being 10-feet wide). .
." The Grant of Public Access Easements currently before the County Council includes the
same 10-foot easement description.
Who maintains the trails:
The Cultural Impact Assessment submitted by Kohala Kai as part of the SMA permit
application says "The public access easements will be maintained as part of the proposed
Kohala Kai development; and will serve to mitigate any impacts relating to coastal access
and the use of the shoreline for fishing." The SMA Permit 06-10 issued in May 2006 says
"The public access easements will be maintained as part of the development and will serve
to mitigate any impacts relating to coastal access and the use of the shoreline for ocean
activities. A condition will be included requiring that the public pedestrian and access
easements be improved for public use." When the developer submitted the Public Access
Plan in January 2013 the condition to construct the trails was acknowledged. But the text
said: "Kohala Kai shall have no responsibility to maintain, control, implement or provide
public accesses upon and through the project." In addition to the county taking over
maintenance of the trails, "the County shall assume all liability for maintenance and control
of the public access easements." The plan calls for all "night fishing activities through a
permit system managed by the County of Hawaii pursuant to Planning Department Rule 21,
and does not include the right to overnight camping." In response the Planning Director
wrote saying "We request that this section be amended to provide for maintenance of the
public accesses by Kohala Kai or any successor homeowner's association."
The Grant of Public Access Agreement before the County Council says Kohala Kai will
only be responsible for maintaining the pedestrian public trail in the two small places where
the private and the public pathways overlap. Other than that Kohala Kai "shall have no
responsibility to maintain, control, implement or provide pedestrian public access upon on
through the Project. The Grantee (the County) shall be solely responsible for maintaining,
controlling, insuring and repairing all remaining sections of the trail. . ." Also the County
will bear all costs of relocating the trail should the land under it be eroded away or
destroyed.
Parking a long dangerous walk from the mauka-makai trail:
The SMA permits describe the public parking of a minimum of three spaces "in close
proximity to the mauka end of a mauka-makai pedestrian trail." Neither the SMA Permit
06-10, the Tentative Subdivision Approval (dated Feb. 13, 2009) or the Grant of Public
Easement document before the County Council mention that in order to get to the mauka-
makai trail the public must leave Kohala Kai property and walk along the pavement of Akoni
Pule Highway for approximately 160 lineal feet before returning to Kohala Kai property for
an additional approximately 200-foot distance along the highways to the proposed trail. This
requirement of the public to walk beside traffic going 55 miles per hour only appears in a
footnote at the bottom of page 2 of the Public Access Plan submitted in April 2013.
Trail description downgraded:
SMA Permit No. 06-10 says: "The trails shall be constructed or their construction
shall be bonded prior to Final Subdivision Approval, to standards meeting with the approval
of the Planning Director." The trails were constructed by Kohala Kai LLC prior to submission
of the Public Access Plan. The location and condition of the pre-constructed trails was
approved by the Planning Director during a site inspection Jan. 31, 2013 with slight
modifications that were approved April 18.2013. That was the month Kohala Kai submitted
a draft Public Access Plan in which said: "The lateral pedestrian public trail shall have a
minimum 6-foot wide walking area with a graded earthen surface to allow reasonable
pedestrian passage." A month later, without any communications appearing the
department files regarding the trails, a Final Public Access Plan was accepted saying "The
lateral pedestrian public access trails shall have a cleared or constructed earthen surface to
allow reasonable pedestrian passage." The 6-foot wide graded trail somehow got lost.
Access to historic sites and burial eliminated:
In reviewing the historic sites preservation plan, the Hawaii State Historic
Preservation Division called for signs with minimal interpretation on the 6 sites, including 2
burials, identified as well as buffers and maintenance. The letter dated Oct. 16, 2000 says:
"Public access must be ensured to enable the public to see the sites." There is no provision
for site visitation in the Public Access Plan or Grant of Easement.
Recommendations of the North Kohala Community Development Plan
ignored:
No mention was found in Planning Department files of communication between the
department and developer about the public access recommendations of the North Kohala
Community Development Plan. The Kohala Kai Public Access Plan, required as a condition
of both SMAs, was not submitted to the department until April 2013, five years after the
NKCDP became a County Ordinance in Nov. 2008. Neither the planning department nor the
land owner provided a copy of the draft Public Access Plan or the Public Access Grant of
Easement to the NKCDP Action Committee or its subcommittee, the NK Community Access
Group. Copies of the access agreement were provided to the Access Group by County
Council members in August of this year just prior to the first hearing of this resolution.