The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRES 095 Draft 01 1998-2000COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII RESOLUTION N0. � 95 99 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) SELF- EVALUATION AND TRANSITION PLAN FOR STREETS AND SIDEWALKS BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: WHEREAS, 28 C.F.R. §§35.105 AND 35.150 call for the County of Hawaii to perform a Self -Evaluation of its current services, policies, and practices that do not, or may not, meet the requirements of 28 C.F.R., Part 35, and to prepare a Transition Plan setting forth the steps necessary to complete or augment changes to achieve program accessibility; and WHEREAS, the Settlement Agreement Release and Order filed in Alexa Russell, et al. vs. County of Hawaii, USDC Civil No. 97-00379DAE on October 2, 1997, Requires the County to adopt a Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan by July 2, 1999; and WHEREAS, the County of Hawaii through its consultant Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. and its subconsultant, Hecker Design Ltd., has completed the Self -Evaluation Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and a Transition Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit `B." NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII that the Self -Evaluation and Transition Plan are hereby adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Clerk of the County of Hawaii provide a copy of this Resolution to the Mayor of the County of Hawaii, the Director of Parks and Recreation, Corporation Counsel and the County's ADA Coordinator. Dated: Hilo, Hawaii this day of INTRODUCED BY: 1999. a:sccomtn\Reso ADA sc COUNTY COUNCIL County of Hawaii Hilo, Hawaii I hereby certify that the foregoing RESOLUTION was by the vote indicated to the right hereof adopted by the COUNCIL of the County of Hawaii on ATTEST: COUNTY CLERK CHAIRMAN & PRESIDING OFFICER ROLL CALL VOTE ARAKAKI CHUNG ELARIONOFF JACOBSON LEITHEAD-TODD PISICCHIO I SMITH 1 1 1 1 1 TYLER YAGONG C-312/PW&PC RESOLUTION NO._ 95 99 Americans with Disabilities Act Final Self Evaluation Findings Policies & Practices Related to Streets and Sidewalks Prepared For: County of Hawaii Department of Public Works Prepared By: Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. and Bill Hecker, AIA — Accessibility Consultant Hecker Design, Ltd. May 25, 1999 EXHIBIT A y c -so z ceas. 9s--99) Table of Contents Appendix A Model ADA Self Evaluation Questionnaire Appendix B Attendance Sheets for Public Meetings Held on October 16 and 17, 1998 ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii Page Introduction I Non -Discrimination Policy Statement I Review of Policies and Practices 2 General Issues — Programs Reviewed 2 County of Hawaii — ADA Coordinator (Office of Mayor) 2 County of Hawaii — Mayor's Office of Information and Complaint 2 Dept. of Public Works — Chief of Engineering Division 3 Dept. of Public Works — Highway Maintenance Division 3 Dept. of Public Works — Traffic Division 3 Dept. of Public Works — Construction Inspection 3 Mass Transit Authority — Paratransit Coordinator 4 Denied Access to Services 4 Inequality of Benefits 4 Significant Assistance through Other Agencies or Contractors 4 Planning and Advisory Boards 5 Limitation of Rights, Privileges or Opportunities 5 Required Use of Special Programs 10 Different Treatment for Disabled Citizens 10 Special Accommodations by County 10 Alteration and New Construction Standards & Practices 1 I Selection of Procurement Contractors I 1 Training on ADA 12 Eligibility Criteria 13 Integrated Settings 13 Surcharges 13 Written Policies 13 Historic Programs 13 Technical Infeasibility and Undue Burden 13 Communication Issues 14 Appendix A Model ADA Self Evaluation Questionnaire Appendix B Attendance Sheets for Public Meetings Held on October 16 and 17, 1998 ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii Introduction This report has been developed to fulfill a portion of the County of Hawaii's requirements under the implementing regulations for Title II of the American's with Disabilities Act of 1990 found at 28 CFR 35.105(a), and the Settlement Agreement and Order filed in Russel vs. County of Hawaii in USDC Civil No. 97-00379 DAE. It has been prepared by the accessibility consultants (Consultants) hired by the County to assist with accessibility evaluations and compliance planning. The Self Evaluation process described by this report is limited to those policy and practice issues relating to the County's streets and sidewalks. Architectural modification (i.e.: physical change) recommendations relating to streets and sidewalks will be addressed in the County's forthcoming Transition Plan. The following process was developed to help ensure that the County's programs, services and activities that relate to streets and sidewalks will allow the full participation of people with disabilities: 1. Development of the Self Evaluation Questionnaire by the Consultants; 2. Coordinate with the County's ADA Team to determine who would be questioned; 3. Distribute the Questionnaire to Departmental ADA Liaisons for completion; 4. Interviews with the Departmental ADA Liaisons for clarification; 5. Consultant analysis of the Questionnaires and Meeting Notes; 6. Documentation of Findings in the Draft Self Evaluation Report; 7. County Review and Revisions; 8. Public Comment and "Town Hall Meeting"; 9. Self Evaluation Report with revisions per public comment to County for approval; 10. Modification of those County Policies and Practices found to limit program access. This report is intended to present all of the County's programs, services and activities relating to streets and sidewalks, and to identify those policies and practices that may not allow people with disabilities to fully participate in their use. In addition, recommendations for policy and/or practice modifications are provided by the consultants and will be replaced by the County's Implementation Order after public comment and final County approval. Non -Discrimination Policy The County of Hawaii has incorporated the following non-discrimination policy statement that would be applicable to programs, services and activities that relate to streets and sidewalks: ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii The County of Hawaii does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admissions or access to or treatment or employment in, its programs or activities. Norman Olesen, ADA Coordinator for the County of Hawaii, has been designated to coordinate compliance with the non-discrimination requirements contained in the Department ofdustice regulations implementing Subtitle A of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42USC 12131) which prohibits discrimination on the basis ofdisability by public agencies. Mr. Olesen may be reached at the: Office of the Mayor — County of Hawaii 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, H196720 (808) 961-8223 phone (808) 961-8521 v/tdd (808) 961-6553 fax [published in the Hawaii Tribune -Herald on February 27, 1998] Review of Policies & Practices The format of this report is derived from the Self Evaluation Questionnaire (attached hereto) which was categorized into General Curb Ramp Issues, Program Access Issues and Communication Issues. Each of these areas relates to the County's polices and practices regarding streets and sidewalks. Care was taken to coordinate the requirements of the ADA Title II Regulations (28 CFR Part 35) and the technical assistance guidance provided in the Department of Justice (DOJ) funded publication ADA Title II Action Guide. General Curb Ramp Issues 1. Programs - The list below identifies County personnel who were interviewed by the consultants and presents brief descriptions of their Departmental programs, activities and services related to streets and sidewalks (i.e.: fully improved pedestrian circulation routes within the jurisdiction of the County of Hawaii). A. County of Hawaii - ADA Coordinator: Norman Olesen, PE Mr. Olesen works for the Office of the Mayor as the County's ADA Coordinator designated by law to coordinate the County's efforts to comply with the ADA and fulfill the County's responsibilities. His duties include, among other things, the evaluation of the County's implementation of this Self Evaluation Report and the ADA Transition Plan. B. County of Hawaii - Office of Information and Complaint: Charmaine Shigemura Complaint officers or investigators in the Office of Information and Complaint (OIC) receive and/or investigate concerns and complaints relating to inadequacies of curb ramps, sidewalks, and streets. As necessary, these issues are written up and sent to the functional department which has jurisdiction to determine what needs to be done and the best course of action for rectifying ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks —County of Hawaii the matter. If the complainant desires a response, the functional department provides follow-up with that person. Typically streets and sidewalk complaints are directed to the Department of Public Works for action and most are received via the telephone (TTY is available to OIC staff in the Mayor's office). C. Dept. of Public Works - Div. of Engineering: Galen Kuba, PE Except for highway maintenance work, the division provides oversight for all county highway construction activity, including driveway construction, sidewalk repairs and utility work within County rights-of-way. The Division reviews and inspects subdivisions construction plans and establishes design and construction of highway related capital improvement, fuel tax and federal aid projects. Projects include major and minor street improvements, resurfacing, new construction as well as curb ramp improvements. The Division may also design and construct projects for the Department of Parks and Recreation. Consultants are usually used for large scale projects and/or those projects that involve land acquisition, environmental and social impacts or other specialized work. There is no DPW "right-of-way" agent, those issues are addressed by a consultant as needed. D. Dept. of Public Works — Div. of Highway Maintenance: Stanley Nakasone This division is responsible for the maintenance of all County roads and streets. Their work typically includes pot -hole repairs, in-house resurfacing of minor streets and road side repair and maintenance. They also investigate encroachment and sidewalk damage complaints. Although the Hawaii County Code states that the adjoining property owner is responsible for the removal of encroachments and the repair of sidewalks, the division will do "emergency" work to protect the safety and welfare of the general public. E. Dept. of Public Works - Traffic Division: Richard Nishimura, PE This division of the Department of Public Works has two primary ties to the programs that relate to street and sidewalk accessibility. The first is striping crosswalks at intersections so disabled users do not have to proceed into oncoming traffic to cross the street, and secondly, "on street" parking is planned and implemented through this division and affects street access if disabled users are not offered the same opportunities as others. Additionally, the policies for street signs are developed and implemented by this division. There are 65 traffic signal systems operated by the County, with research underway for determining the most appropriate audible signal design option. F. Dept. of Public Works — Construction Inspections: Ben Ishii, PE This division has responsibility over the construction projects within the County's rights-of-way and coordinates the engineering consultants work with the work of the construction contractors. Through these inspectors, the County has an opportunity to catch field work not in compliance with the construction drawings or the ADAAG. ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii 3 G. Mass TransitAuthority— Transit Coordinator: Tom Brown This division has little apparent relationship to programs, activities or services related to the use of streets and sidewalks for people with disabilities, since there is no "local" bus service within the urban areas of the County — there is only regional bus service. Where bus stops are situated on County sidewalks, accessible features per ADAAG are required and high priority will be given to those sidewalks under the Transition Plan for curb ramp installations. 2. Denied Access to Services - There were no accounts of people with disabilities being turned away from any offices without the opportunity to participate in the aid, benefits or services offered by the County dealing with matters related to accessible streets and sidewalks. Recommendation: In an attempt to minimize the future potential ofsuch an occurrence, the County's ADA Coordinator has scheduled an educational program (through the Hawaii Commission on Persons with Disabilities) on appropriate staff behavior related to people with disabilities seeking to benefit from the programs of the County. These workshops will include County employees that have direct contact (in-person, or on the phone) with citizens on issues related to the accessibility ofstreets and sidewalks. 3. Inequality of Benefits - Regarding the existence of services, aids or benefits related to streets and sidewalks that are not equal to, or that do not offer the same opportunities, the following concerns were identified in the Self Evaluation process: A. Accessibility Concern - Until this project, people with disabilities were not offered the same opportunities as others who use the sidewalks due to the lack of a comprehensive Transition Plan that proactively plans for curb ramp installations. The Curb Ramp Installation Plan of 1997 did not address this regulatory requirement to proactively plan for the installation or modification of curb ramps to ensure program accessibility when the sidewalk system was viewed in it's entirety. The intersections identified in that Plan were determined in a "reactive" manner, based upon individual citizen complaints and requests for curb ramp modifications. Recommendation: While the County should be commended for their attempts to address citizen complaints and requests for specific curb ramp modifications or installations, this appears to fall short of the requirements of the ADA for the development of a Transition Plan dealing with curb ramps - this shortfall will be mitigated by the completion of the forthcoming Transition Plan required under the Consent Decree and Order. 4. Significant Assistance through Other Agencies or Contractors — There was only one documented account of people with disabilities being discriminated by contractors or other agencies that provide aid, benefits or services on behalf of the County dealing with matters related to accessible streets and sidewalks. That case involved a private contractor who was hired by the Army Corp of Engineers to install culverts along the roadway and in the process of doing that work his crew destroyed a section of sidewalk at an intersection. The contractor replaced the sidewalk and corner curb, but didn't install a new curb ramp as part of the new work. Disability Rights Hawaii filed a complaint with the Army alleging that the failure of the contractor, working within the County, to install a curb ramp in the new sidewalk violated ADA ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii rd and the Army should require the contractor to install the curb ramp. The Army claimed it was exempt, but the curb ramp was installed at the direction of the County and the Chief Engineer issued a Memo stating that in the future all County work should include the following applicable requirements: General Construction Notes — All Divisions: Should a contractor, for any reason, be responsible for damages to a public facility that is not within the scope of the project and does not comply with the current requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), in addition to making repairs to that facility, the contractor shall at his own expense provide all necessary improvements such that the public facility complies with all current requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meets with the approval of the Department of Public Works. Notes for Work within the County Right of Way — Engineering Division: Should damages to a sidewalk, curb and/or gutter occur at a location where a curb cut for the disabled should exist or to a driveway that does not meet with the current requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), repair work shall include the construction of a curb cut for the disabled or the driveway shall be reconstructed such that the repair work complies with the current requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and meets with the approval of the Department of Public Works. These requirements are exactly what the ADA requires under alteration provisions of the ADA in ADAAG 4.1.6(1)(b). See also Item #6-J in this section of the Self Evaluation Report. Recommendation: In an attempt to minimize the future potential ofsuch an occurrence, the County's ADA Coordinator has scheduled an educational program (through the Hawaii Commission on Persons with Disabilities) on appropriate staff behavior related to people with disabilities seeking to benefit from the programs of the County. These workshops will include County employees that have direct contact (in person, or on the phone) with citizens on issues related to the accessibility of streets and sidewalks.. 5. Planning and Advisory Boards - While the ADA requires the County to allow disabled citizens the participate in Planning and Advisory Boards dealing with issues of accessible streets and sidewalks (namely the Mayor's Committee on People with Disabilities), there was no evidence of the County prohibiting any qualified disabled citizen from participating in these Planning and Advisory Board because of his/her disability. Recommendations: While the forthcoming Transition Plan will document the systematic strategyfor curb ramp and sidewalk accessibility, the Mayor's Committee on People with Disabilities and other local advocacy groups should be given a prominent role in the Public Hearing process though which comments are received. 6. Limitation of Rights, Privileges or Opportunities — The issue in this section deals with the limitation of rights, privileges or opportunities of people with disabilities by the County or ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii 5 through contracts with others that provide services for the County that relate to streets and sidewalks. A. Accessibility Concern — While there have been no specific cases presented to allege that Council judgments (regarding the impediment of pedestrian flow on county sidewalks under County Ordinance section 22-25) have affected people with disabilities, these judgments do fall under the ADA. It is critical that in making these determinations the Council consider the space requirements and other needs outlined in the ADA Standards for Accessible Design (ADAAG or UFAS) for disabled pedestrians. Recommendations: The Consultants will make a briefpresentation to the County Council describing the specific pedestrian concerns ofpeople with disabilities so these judgments can be made from a completely informed perspective. B. Accessibility Concern — In the past, County policies and practices related to the standard design and construction of driveway aprons have made the accessibility of the pedestrian circulation network difficult, if not impossible for many disabled users. Specifically, the design and construction practice of including the steep cross slope of the driveway apron within the accessible route of the sidewalk by using Standard Detail R-29. This creates conditions that tend to direct wheelchair users into the street as they attempt to traverse the driveway apron. Recommendations: The Consultants will evaluate and report on specific elements of the standard design details for driveway aprons. All future projects involving the alteration of the sidewalks should include (up to the 20% maximum of the total budget) 'path of travel" investigations to determine if it would be technically feasible to modify existing non-compliant driveway aprons which create potentially hazardous cross slope conditions on the sidewalks - then modify those which are feasible to make accessible within the financial limitations ofADA. The County should adopt design standards that are in strict compliance with the ADA Standards for Accessible Design (a.k.a. ADA Accessibility Guidelines or ADAAG). It is anticipated that the Department of Public Works will be faced with conditions where the concerns of Highway Standards for automobiles conflict with the requirements of the accessibility standards of the federal ADA for people who use wheelchairs - it is the Consultants belief that the potential for wheelchair users to be thrown from their wheelchairs, or directed into the street by the steep cross slopes of the driveway aprons that cross the sidewalk outweigh the inconvenience of motorist who will have to negotiate the accessible driveway aprons more carefully to avoid jarring the occupants of the vehicle. A balanced design strategy should be the desire of the County's engineering staff C. Accessibility Concern — While a concerted effort has been made in recent years, past County policies and practices related to the standard design and construction of street resurfacing projects made the accessibility of sidewalks that are served by them difficult, if not hazardous for many disabled users. Specifically, each time the County elected not to grind down the old pavement before installing a new layer of asphalt, the resulting overlay created a lip that could ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii G exceed the maximum 1/4" high vertical transition allowed under the ADA for the accessible route along the crosswalk. Current policy is to try to "feather out" the new pavement to avoid these non-compliant lips. Recommendations: In all street repaving, the County should continue to 'feather " the pavement at curb ramps, or include the requirement that, at least the transition area at the bottom of each curb ramp (ifnot the whole street) be ground down to allow aflush, stable pavement transition for the asphalt/curb gutter connection. No vertical lips greater than 1/4" should be allowed on the accessible route at the cross walk. D. Accessibility Concern - There is a history of County policies and practices related to the alteration of existing streets (i.e.: resurfacing projects, street replacements, etc.) and sidewalks since the effective date of the ADA accessible design and construction requirements (January 26, 1992) without incorporating the additional curb ramp installations or accessibility modifications required under the selected ADA Title II Standards for Accessible Design. In many cases this would have required the installation of new accessible curb ramps and/or the modification of non-compliant existing curb ramps in the alteration scope of work - the intent of the ADA alteration provisions defined by Congress was to strategically remove architectural barriers in existing facilities during alteration projects in an attempt to mitigate the financial burden on Public Entities as they plan for the removal of barriers to program access through the Transition Plan process. Recently County policy has changed and the addition of "path of travel" accessibility work during alteration projects will be included into the project scope of work. This additional work, up to the regulatory maximum of 20% of the alteration cost, will cover the removal of architectural barriers (typically curb ramp work and sidewalk repaving) along the approach to the altered primary function areas. The focus has recently been on adding new curb ramps when alteration projects require, but not to modify existing, non-compliant curb ramps — this policy must change to include the modification of existing curb ramps when required. Recommendations: 1. A memo should be issued which states that in all street and sidewalk alteration projects the County will remove architectural barriers along the 'path of travel" to the altered area to ensure an accessible approach, unless the cost of doing so would exceed 20% of the total alteration budget. If it does exceed 20116, the County should prioritize the expenditure of these funds in the most appropriate manner possible and in consultation with the Mayors Committee on Persons with Disabilities. Examples of these path of travel barriers would include inaccessible driveway aprons, the lack of curb ramps, inaccessible existing curb ramps, non- compliant sidewalk cross slopes, and the like. 2. Because the duty to ensure 'path of travel" modifications is tied to a higher alteration "standard of care" under ADA, as opposed to the flexible 'program access "duty, the Consultants will list the intersections and curb ramps covered under this duty separately in the Transition Plan. ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii 7 3. A separate funding process should be developed to ensure that the two "standards of care" associated with these different duties under ADA are addressed in such a way that the absolute dutyfor alteration work is not diluting the flexible program access prioritization process of the Transition Plan. This funding source separation is important since the limitations associated with alteration projects (i. e.: 20% cap) are not as flexible as the limitations associated with the program accessibility process (i.e.: "viewed in its entirety" and undue financial or administrative burden) and coordinating the funding could become a nightmare. 4. There was some concern about the applicability of this "path of travel " requirement when alterations are funded by the fuel tax, since extensive curb ramp modifications do not currently appear to fall under the types of work on which the fuel tax can be spent. The Consultants will work closely with the Corporation Counsel to determine what the best course of action will be regarding this concern. E. Accessibility Concern - The County Ordinance Section 22-54 refers to engineering details (P-1005, P-1006 for curbs and gutters) that appear to be developed in 1969. At that time the design accommodations for disabled users were not as complete or accessible as the ADA requirements, thus these details are out of date for ADA compliance. Recommendations: While the ordinance specifies these details, the DPW practice has been to include the most updated details of this type. In fact, the practice has been to use details approved by the Hawaii Commission on Persons with Disabilities. The ordinance is being revised to reflect the most current details so others who may be responsible for these designs do not rely on the outdated and inaccessible requirements. F. Accessibility Concern - The County Ordinance Section 22-55 refers to engineering details (P-1003 for sidewalks, P-1007 for driveways) that appear to be developed in 1969. At that time the design accommodations for disabled users were not as complete or accessible as the ADA requirements, thus these details are out of date for ADA compliance. Recommendations: While the ordinance specifies these details, the DPW practice has been to include the most updated details of this type. In fact, the practice has been to use details approved by the Hawaii Commission on Persons with Disabilities. The ordinance is being revised to reflect the most current details so other who may be responsible for these designs do not rely on the outdated and inaccessible requirements. G. Accessibility Concern — There is evidence that, in the past, the County has given less attention than is appropriate to the issue of curb ramp placement at intersections. Particularly, the reliance on the diagonal curb ramp design in some situations where the placement of such an element would create a situation where a wheelchair user would have to proceed into on -coming traffic to cross the street. If the diagonal curb ramp is placed at a corner where the radius of curvature at the curb is too small (approximately 13' or less) then the pedestrian using a wheelchair or scooter will be exposed to on -coming traffic. Four feet is required at the bottom landing of any curb ramp (unless site limitations prohibit) to allow the wheelchair or scooter user ADA .Self Evaluation Report on Slreels & Sidewalks— County of Hawaii 8 to be sheltered from on -coming traffic by the geometry of the intersection. This 4' area is supposed to be screened by the intersection of the crosswalk stripes, in many cases the DPW Traffic Division, has incorporated non-compliant "truncated" striping designs which are unacceptable. The 4' crosswalk area needs to be out of the traffic flow to be effective. Also, if the intersection of two streets is not at or about 90 degrees, or if the diagonal curb ramp is installed at a location other than the apex of the corner, then the same situation can arise. It appears that this design and implementation pattern was unintentional and due primarily to a lack of understanding of accessible design requirements — in fact in the most recent curb ramp installation projects, these issues were addressed. Recommendation: These inaccessible curb ramp installations are to be identified in the Transition Plan and will be scheduled for replacement or modification to ensure the most accessible installations feasible. The Consultants will work with the DPW to clarify these concerns so they are identified in the future during design and construction inspections. H. Accessibility Concern — The County has no audible crossing signals for alerting visually impaired pedestrians of crossing conditions, and if the whole network of signalized intersections is taken into account, audible accommodations for those with visual impairments must be addressed. The DPW Traffic Division is waiting for uniform standards to be completed by the Hawaii Department of Transportation and the new technical assistance publication soon to be available from the US Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board on standardized systems. Recommendation: During the Transition Plan investigation comments from the Disability Community will be sought for the most appropriate locations for new audible signals to be installed so the major pedestrian circulation routes are accessible to everyone. I. Accessibility Concern — The County has a practice of providing "paved shoulders" for pedestrian access along some County roads and separating the vehicles from pedestrians by means of an asphalt berm. While this practice is not discriminatory, many of the "paved shoulder" pedestrian routes appear to have an excessive cross slope (>2%) and make it difficult for many wheelchair users to negotiate. In fact, Standard Detail R-34 for "streets with shoulders" shows a'/4" per foot slope at the shoulder which translates to a 6.25% cross slope for pedestrian that may be using the shoulder like a sidewalk. Note that not all paved shoulders are equipped with these asphalt berms, most are simply for emergency use and lateral support of the road. Recommendation: The design of `paved shoulders" along County roads for pedestrian access should comply with the accessible route provisions to the degree that it is feasible to do so. It is particularly important to limit the cross slope to a maximum of 2% along the pedestrian route by revising Standard Detail R-34. The County must ensure that the "built-up" asphalt curbs have level cuts to allow for crossing the roads at intersections. The Consultants will work closely with the DPW to establish the "dimensional tolerance" applicable to AC (asphalt) paving. It should be noted that there are proposed changes to the County Code regarding the safe use of designated pedestrian use of the paved shoulders. ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawan 9 J. Accessibility Concern — At least once the advocacy organization Disability Rights Hawaii has identified the County's practice of installing a new curb at an intersection (1996- makai side of Kapiolani at Kukuau Street) without installing an accessible curb ramp. This is in direct violation of the ADA Standards for Accessible Design which states: "If existing elements, spaces or common areas are altered, then each such altered element, space or area shall comply with the applicable provisions of... [the] Minimum Requirements for New Construction... " ADAAG 4.1.6(1)(b) This provision of ADA is totally different from the "path of travel" requirements of alterations. In this portion of ADAAG the County is required to comply with the accessibility provisions of the ADA Standards for Accessible Design when a new or altered element is built. Sometimes these alterations trigger the "path of travel" requirements, but regardless of that, if there is a new element installed it must be accessible if feasible. Recommendation: All of those in the Department of Public Works that have a role in the design, construction or maintenance ofsidewalks and streets should attend a training session by the Consultants on the application ofADA on streets and sidewalks and follow the DPW memo. 7. Required Use of Special Programs — There were no specific "special programs" other than the implementation of the ADA that affect people with disabilities who may use the sidewalks and curb ramps. Recommendation: No Action Required. 8. Different Treatment for Disabled - There were no accounts of people with disabilities being treated differently in the opportunities to participate in the aid, benefits or services offered by the County dealing with matters related to accessible streets and sidewalks that were not already covered in Item #6 above. Recommendation: In an attempt to minimize the future potential of such an occurrence, the County's ADA Coordinator has scheduled an educational program (through the Hawaii Commission on Persons with Disabilities) on appropriate staff behavior related to people with disabilities seeking to benefit from the programs of the County. These workshops will include County employees that have direct contact (in person, or on the phone) with citizens on issues related to the accessibility of streets and sidewalks. 9. Special Accommodations by County - The following special accommodations were identified for people with disabilities regarding the opportunity to participate in the aid, benefits or services offered by the County dealing with matters related to accessible streets and sidewalks. A. "Curb Ramps Installation" - The County began a limited program of installing curb ramps at intersections many years ago and has had various curb ramp installation projects in recent years. These recent projects have included direct consultations with the Mayors Committee and Disability Rights Hawaii. The Consultants have review much of the ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks —County of Hawaii 10 correspondence from these disability organizations and noted the willingness on the part of the County to consider their recommendations and prioritization suggestions. A brief report will be developed by the Consultants to summarize these findings. Recommendation: The Consultants will also rely upon the recommendations of these two groups during the development of the Transition Plan for Curb Ramps and this Self Evaluation Report. The County should continue this open relationship with those whom the ADA was enacted to support. B. "Complaint Process" - The County has recently developed a grievance procedure prepared under the guidance of the County's ADA Coordinator. This new grievance procedure will be applicable for all ADA related issues including those that deal with streets and sidewalk accessibility. Currently street and sidewalk complaints are received by many agencies of the County government and typically are routed to the Engineering Division of DPW or to the Office of the ADA Coordinator. Recommendation: This new grievance procedure will be attached to the final draft of the Self Evaluation report. 10. Alteration and New Construction Standards - Even though federal law (ADA) and state law (HRS 103-50) require compliance with the ADA Standards for Accessible Design (ADAAG), past departmental practices appear to have given deference to the standard details for curb ramp and driveway apron designs over the ADA Accessibility Standards requirements for those features. Additionally, it appears that a few County sidewalk/roadway projects have been completed without the benefit of an accessible design review (per ADAAG under HRS 103-50) by the Commission on Persons with Disabilities. Those reviews might have caught potential problems before they were "cast in stone" or concrete, as the case may be. Recommendations: The Consultants will review and report on these standard details to determine the specific revisions required to ensure compliance with the ADA Standards for Accessible Design. The Mayor and the Department of Public Works Director should issue a joint Executive Memo regarding the County's commitment to the concrete implementation of the County's Non -Discrimination Policy through the thoughtful accessible design ofpedestrian circulation routes. The Memo can stress the importance of informed engineering practices, thorough consultant coordination and dedicated site inspections. The Chief Engineer has issued a Memo (2/28/97) stating the DPW's commitment to have all projects reviewed for accessibility compliance by the Commission on Persons with Disabilities -Facilities Access Unit. 11. Selection of Procurement Contractors - There were no accounts of qualified disabled contractors being rejected or the development of criteria that would tend to screen out otherwise qualified disabled contractors dealing with matters related to accessible streets and sidewalks. Recommendation: In an attempt to minimize the future potential ofsuch an occurrence, the County's ADA Coordinator should develop or contract for an educational program (in-house workshops, orientation training, etc.) on appropriate staff behavior related to people with disabilities seeking to benefit from the programs of the County. These workshops should include ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii 11 each County employee that has direct contact (in person, or on the phone) with citizens on issues related to the accessibility ofstreets and sidewalks 12. Training on ADA A. Accessibility Concern — Until recently only a few of the engineers from the Department of Public Works have attended training on ADA accessible design, and only one session focused on issues relating to curb ramps. Many of the design and inspection staff have need of a detailed understanding of accessibility as it relates to sidewalks and streets. Recommendation: The design and inspection staff of the Department of Public Works that deal with street and sidewalk accessibility attended specific training on the accessible design offered by the Consultants on June 26, 1998. Further understanding of the ADA requirements will occur during the Transition Plan implementation phase. B. Accessibility Concern - There were no accounts of staff training relating to "reasonable modifications" to policies, practices or procedures dealing with streets and sidewalks. Of particular concern was the fact that there currently is no "Right of Way Agent" in the County Government and issues typically dealt with by such an agent are dealt with by the Council or a consultant. Basically, the staff had little awareness of the need for an accommodation in those cases where an independent property owner may need to encroach on the public "right-of-way" to ensure compliance with his/her ADA Title III responsibilities and this lack of awareness is central to the education efforts proposed herein. While the variance process may not be the most appropriate vehicle for accommodating requests from business owners who have little or no choice but to seek to modify the sidewalk to ensure accessibility, it is the most well known process to the public. Given that many shop/business owners are in a "Catch 22" situation where they must make their entrances accessible per ADA, but there is an existing, the County should install a procedural mechanism for thoughtfully negotiating accessible solutions for these unique situations. Of course, there will be some conditions that are impossible to correct, but each should be considered on a case by case basis or it could be said that the lack of accommodation by the County is itself a form of discrimination. Recommendation: In an attempt to minimize the future potential ofsuch an occurrence, the County's ADA Coordinator should develop or contract for an educational program (in-house workshops, orientation training, etc.) on appropriate staff behavior and procedures related to businesses seeking to negotiate with the County about right-of-way use. An honest evaluation of the criteria associated with the denial of right-of-way use should be developed and the County should be willing to be flexible when the most appropriate accessible modification encroaches into County land. Note that it is not inappropriate to demand that future use of the right-of-way may require the business to spend money to remove the encroachment and that hardship at that time is not going to be a deterrent to needed demolition. ADA Se[f Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii 12 13. Eligibility Criteria - There were no accounts of people with disabilities being discriminated against due to eligibility criteria for aid, benefits or services of the County dealing with matters related to accessible streets and sidewalks. Recommendation: In an attempt to minimize the future potential ofsuch an occurrence, the County's ADA Coordinator has scheduled an educational program (through the Hawaii Commission on Persons with Disabilities) on appropriate staff behavior related to people with disabilities seeking to benefit from the programs of the County. These workshops will include County employees that have direct contact (in person, or on the phone) with citizens on issues related to the accessibility of streets and sidewalks. 14. Integrated Settings - There were no accounts of people with disabilities being discriminated against by the lack of integrated settings for aid, benefits or services of the County dealing with matters related to accessible streets and sidewalks. Recommendation: Continue to operate in a way that does not discriminate against people with disabilities. 15. Surcharges - There were no accounts of people with disabilities being required to pay a special fee or surcharge for aid, benefits or services of the County dealing with matters related to accessible streets and sidewalks. Recommendation: Continue to operate in a way that does not discriminate against people with disabilities. 16. Written Policies - There are written policies outlined in the County Ordinance discussed above that relate to accessible streets and sidewalks, as well as, standard design details for the construction of curb ramps and driveway aprons. There are also memoranda from County departments that amend and expand upon the design requirements for streets and sidewalks. Recommendation: The Consultants will review and report on these standard details and design practices to determine the specific revisions required to ensure compliance with the ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Where applicable, the County Ordinance should be revised to refect the accessible features required by the ADA. 17. Historic Programs — The only sidewalks or streets affected by the designation (or qualification for designation) as a facility listed on the National Register of Historic Places or other State or local historic designation program are those at Kalakaua Park (near Hilo Post Office) and possibly the lava curbs on some older areas. The ADA allows for some limitations to accessibility if the historic significance of the facility would be threatened or destroyed. Recommendation: No Action Required at this time, during the implementation of the Transition Plan for curb ramps some accommodations may be required. 18. Technical Infeasibility and Undue Burden — The County cited the "undue administrative burden" limitation in discussions leading up to the settlement related to streets and sidewalks. The Department of Public Works cited a few ADA limitations relating to streets and sidewalks. ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii 13 DPW identified certain site conditions (extreme slopes, 8' max. curb ramp length, catch basins, drainage, etc.) as things that may limit the installation of accessible features at a particular location. Recommendation: The Consultants will work closely with the DPW during the development of the Transition Plan for Curb Ramps to help determine the site features that might appropriately discourage accessible modifications as technically infeasible. It is understood that during the design portion of the Transition Plan Implementation Phase there will be a review by the Commission on Persons with Disabilities of those proposals that might be technically infeasible. Undue burden defenses are most appropriately addressed by the Office of the Corporation Counsel. 19. Communication Issues - The staff of the Office of Information & Complaints in Hilo and the Mayor's Office in the (Kona) Satellite County Building have a TDD (or text telephone by which hearing or speech impaired individuals can communicate with someone else who has the small typewriter like device). The policies for sign language interpreters were clearly defined, requiring 48 hour notice for Council and Planning Commission meetings and "as available" for other functions. The Mayor's office and Planning Commission have lists of "qualified" interpreters. Most agencies had photocopiers that would allow documents to be printed in large print, but no agency had access to Braille printers. Recommendations: The primary situations where an agency of the County government might be called upon to communicate with citizens with disabilities are in the areas of information and complaints, or at public hearings for proposed street/sidewalk modifications. Additionally public notices and all printed documents related to streets and sidewalks should be available to those who are visually impaired Continue to utilize the efforts of your communication accommodations advisor (Betsy Palmer) on the Mayors' Committee on Persons with Disabilities. Specific strategies for accessible communication include thefollowing: a. develop a brochure describing the complaint and information process with the Office of Information and Complaints as the main clearing house for those functions - OIC has a TDD and sign language interpreters are available with limited notice; b. develop a relationship with an organization that has a Braille printer, which can print a document from computer disk when requested; c. provide computer disks of data requested for those who have Braille Readers attached to their personal computers; d. consider a computer bulletin board for County notices that might not be in accessible formats for everyone; e. continue the relationship with whomever it is that the County contracts with for sign language interpreters; f obtain assistive listening device equipment (i.e.: an FM or Infrared system is best) to broadcast meeting information in a way that individuals with receivers can control the volume; ADA SetJEvaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii 14 g. develop training for staff that interact with citizens on a regular basis to sensitize them to the issues surrounding communications with people with cognitive impairments; h. develop a brochure that outlines all communication issues that might be encountered by staff dealing with street and sidewalk issues. ADA Self Evaluation Report on Streets & Sidewalks — County of Hawaii 15 Appendix A Model ADA Self Evaluation Questionnaire To: Staff of the County of Hawaii, Hawaii Respondent: NameTtle phone # From: ADA Consultants to the County of Hawaii Date: Re: ADA Self Evaluation Questionnaire In ADA, Disability means... a. a person with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits a major life activity; b. being regarded as having such an impairment; c. having a history ofsuch an impairment. Generally, disabilities are understood as... i. physical impairments (crutch, wheelchair, walker, etc.) ii. sensory impairments (visual, hearing or speech) iii. cognitive disabilities (retardation, head injury, etc.) It is very important that we get a complete listing of all job descriptions of those who deal with curb ramps, streets(particularly resurfacing and reconstruction) or, to ensure that the activities of your agency are thoroughly reviewed! Common reasons people with disabilities are denied services include... i. inability to communicate effectively; ii. facilities are inaccessible; iii. staff thinks "that person can't do this... iv. accommodations are too costly; v. staff not flexible with policies. Self Evaluation of Policies and Practices of the County of Hawaii re: Accessible Curb Cuts, Streets and Sidewalks This document is being distributed to a representative of each of the departments of the County Government that deal with streets, and sidewalks, as part of the process of compliance with the American's with Disabilities Act of 1990. That federal civil rights law protects people with disabilities from discrimination related to the services, programs and activities of County governments. The County of Hawaii has hired an ADA Consultant (Wilson Okamoto & Associates with Bill Hecker, AIA) to develop a strategy for evaluating these services, programs and activities relating to streets, and sidewalks (especially curb ramps). Your role in the process is to informally poll the staff in your office and answer the questions below honestly and with adequate detail for the ADA Consultants to determine what modifications (if any) might best be made to allow people with disabilities to benefit from the same opportunities that are available to other citizens. After you and the other departmental representatives have completed the questionnaires, the ADA Consultants will schedule an interview to review your responses and to seek clarifications on any specific areas that might have been misunderstood. There are no magic answers that we are looking for, just honest documentation of the current policies and practices of your office. Issues related to Curb Ramps 1. On a separate sheet of paper (or the back of this sheet), describe exactly those activities your division is responsible for related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, and who does those activities. Typically it is easiest to list the people in your office by title and then describe what they are responsible for doing next to their names. (Be as detailed as possible)... 2. Has any person with a disability contacted your office regarding a matter related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, and been turned away without the opportunity to participate in the aid, benefits or services for which your division is responsible? If so, explain... ADA Self Evaluation Questionnaire for Streets and Sideivalks - Couniv of Hawaii Example: A Water Board provides blind citizens their water bill in Braille so it is easily understood or the Park and Rec. Board provides swimming classes for those who can't walk Example: A Park and Rec. Board has a contract with a private company to sell refreshments at Softball games - this company discriminates against people with disabilities by not serving a girl with Cerebral Palsy - this refects poorly on the City's Park and Rec. Board for contracting with someone who discriminates against people with disabilities. It is not uncommon for those who appoint planning and advisory boards to make presumptions about the qualifications and limitations ofpeople with disabilities and in effect, make certain that the concerns of the disability community are not well represented Example: A Fire Department makes no accommodations for a sixth grader who uses a wheelchair when her class takes a field trip to the Fire Station and the tour includes steps along the way - the disabled girl is not benefiting from the same opportunities that others in her class are given. Example: Ifthe Fire Department develops a "special" tour just for wheelchair visitors, it's fine - but, if the Fire Department then has a policy that wheelchair users can only go on "special" tours, the Fire Department is at risk of a discrimination claim. Example: When the City Council has a meeting to discuss issues of importance to students ofa school for the Deaf, sign language interpreters were not provided for effective two- way communication during the public hearing. 3. Regarding curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, have any of your staff provided services, aid or benefits to people with disabilities that were different from (i.e.: not equal to, or not offering the same opportunities as) those services, aid or benefits offered to others? If so, explain... 4. Local governmental agencies are not allowed to contract with or provide "significant assistance" to other agencies of government or private companies/individuals that discriminate against people with disabilities. List any disability related complaints made against those with whom you contract or with whom you have working relationships related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets. 5. If your division/department has oversight of or develops planning or advisory boards related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, have there been any disabled candidates for the planning or advisory boards that were not given an equal opportunity to participate? If so, explain... 6. Has your agency directly or through contracts limited the rights, privileges, or opportunities of disabled persons relating to the enjoyment of curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets enjoyed by others? If so, explain... 7. Have disabled citizens ever been required to utilize a "special" program or activity relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, when others are allowed a different or standard type program? If so, explain... 8. Are there any divisional or departmental policies or practices that might tend to treat disabled citizens differently when considering curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, than the way other citizens that interact with your agency might be treated? If so, explain... ADA Self Evaluation Questionnaire jar Streets and Sidewalks -County of Hawaii Example: A special consideration given to a petition by a wheelchair user for a variance to build a short ramp in the sidewalk right-of-way might be appropriate by the board having that authority, since without the variance the prime entrance to his shop would not be accessible and would limit his ability to comply with the ADA barrier removal requirements for places ofpublic accommodation. The attitude of the staff is often a very large part of a discrimination claim. Open, enthusiastic people with even a basic level of understanding regarding the needs and accommodation options available to people with disabilities, can thwart a potential lawsuit or complaint. Example: A State has adopted the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) for all projects and in-house designers, as well as, contract designers are required by the contract to use that standardfor accessible features of all capital improvement projects. The other alternative standard for ADA design compliance is the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standard (UFAS). 9. Are there any divisional or departmental policies or practices that are specially designed to accommodate the needs and requests of persons with disabilities related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? If so, explain... 10. If there are any divisional or departmental policies or practices that are specially designed to accommodate the needs and requests of persons with disabilities relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, how would you rank the staffs attitude toward those programs? a. Very favorable toward the policies b. Favorable toward the policies c. Neutral toward the policies d. Unfavorable toward the policies e. Hostile toward the policies f Not applicable - there are no special policies 11. In your work with other County personnel, what agencies have the best "track record" for dealing with people with disabilities relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, and what agencies have the most room for improvement? 12. When developing the plans for altering or building new curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, what disability related factors are considered, if any? 13. When considering the selection of a procurement contractor for services related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets... a, have you rejected qualified disabled applicants? b. have you developed criteria that would tend to eliminate otherwise qualified disabled applicants? c. if so, explain... ADA Self Evalua(ion Questionnaire for Streets and Sidewalks -County of ffawan Example: A Fire Department provides each new employee with a 112 day training course on specific procedures relating to communications and interactions with people with disabilities. Each employee also receives a pocket sized "cheat sheet" with specific accommodations provided by the Department for those with disabilities. Example: A Library Board requires each person who applies for a library card to present a valid drivers license for identification - this would disallow many blind individuals who might benefit from books on tape or Braille media that is offered by the library because the blind user does not have a drivers license and no otherform of identification is allowed. Example: A Park and Rec. Board offers summer swimming lessons for children at the new center city park, but ifyou are disabled, the "special"program is offered on the outskirts of town in a pool that is undergoing renovation and no one else is allowed to swim there - that is not a very integrated setting. Example: A Park and Rec. Board requires those who use wheelchairs to swim at the pool mentioned above on the outskirts of town and will not allow disabled swimmers at the center city pool - that is discriminatory to the disabled users. Example: To continue with the pool example, it would not be fair to charge the disabled pool users $5.00 to use the pool on the outskirts of town when everyone else is only charged $2.00 for the use of any of the pools in the park system, even if the City spent more money to make the pools accessible - the cost would have to be spread among all pool users. 14. What training regarding 'reasonable modifications" to policies, practices or procedures has your staff had and what has been done to accommodate the needs or desires of disabled citizens making requests for modifications of policies, practices or procedures related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? 15. Does your division have any "eligibility criteria" to determine who can benefit from the services, programs or activities of your staff relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? If so, explain... 16. What steps have been taken by your staff to ensure that the benefits, services or advantages offered by your agency relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets are offered in the most "integrated setting appropriate" to the needs of the citizens with disabilities? 17. Have any disabled citizens been required to accept a particular service or benefit offered by your agency relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets,? If so, explain... 18. Is there a special fee or surcharge placed upon services or activities offered to people with disabilities to cover the costs associated with making the accommodations required by those disabled users for the service or activities related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? If so, explain... ADA Self Evaluation Questionnaire far Streets and Sidewalks -County of Hawaii Example: It is not appropriate for the School Board 19. Have services or activities relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, to disallow the admission of a 3rd grader in the or streets been limited, withheld or otherwise modified from the elementary school just because the 3rd graders father has way things are typically done for any person(s) with disabilities AIDS. or from someone who may be associated with a person(s) with disabilities? If so, explain... While many of the discriminatorypractices ofa local governmental entity are based upon "unwritten rules" a surprising number of ordinances, policies and employee manuals actually detail actions that might be discriminatory to people with disabilities. Ifearlier ADA or 504 Self Evaluations were conducted, information that was obtained can be used in this evaluation. Not everyfacility in the inventory of County buildings needs to be accessible, if it can be shown that when "viewed in its entirety" the programs offered by the County are accessible to people with disabilities. The first step is to determine where every program is housed and ifany "one-of-a-kind"features mandate certain facilities being made accessible. A good starting point for determining the issues that local disability organizations might focus on in the current evaluation ofprograms, services and activities is the determination of what type of complaints were handled in the past by the County. Special considerations are given to potential modifications to Historic facilities when evaluating program accessibility. 20. Are there any written policies relating to the services, practices and activities of your staff regarding curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets, and how do these policies address the issues related to people with disabilities? Program Accessibility Issues 1. Has your division participated in a previous ADA evaluation of the programs relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? If so, explain... 2. Will you list (use GIS Maps or other documents if needed) all the curb ramps, sidewalks, streets and under your departments jurisdiction and list any unique County activities or programs that are served by those facilities? 3. Has your division/department received any complaints regarding the accessibility of curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? If so, explain... 4. Are any of the curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets under your departments jurisdiction part of a facility listed on (or qualified for listing on) the National Register of Historic Places or another State or local historic designation program? if so, which ones... ADA Setf Evaluation Questionnaire far Streets and Sidewalks -County of Hawaii 'Special Accommodations" could be any ofthe following: a. relocating a service to an alternate accessible site; b. providing home visits for those who can't come to the existing County facilities; c. assignment of aides to beneficiaries; d. redesign of equipment; Limitations on the County's program accessibility requirements allowed under ADA... a. undue financialladministrative burden; b. fundamentally altering the nature ofa program; c. destroying the historic significance of a building; d creating a direct threat to the safety of others. Each public entity should have an established grievance policy that County employees are aware of and to which they can direct those who might have a complaint regarding the way people with disabilities are treated One of the most common ways of mitigating the potential for law suits alleging discrimination based upon disability is to provide disability orientation training to those who have direct contact with the public or beneficiaries of County programs. It is critically important from a County policy standpoint, that the facilities altered or improved in a way that affects usability (since January 26, 1992) be reviewed to determine ifthe design and construction was readily accessible to and usable by people with disabilities. There are also duties triggered by altering an existing facility (defined in ADA as "...any human -constructed improvements ... to the natural environment...') that can potentially require a limited expansion of the original scope of work depending on whether UFAS or ADAAG is selected as the standard for accessible design. 5. Has your division/department made any special accommodations for people with disabilities that were not able to be served by existing curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? If so, explain... 6. Has your department ever relied upon a limitation available in the ADA to defend against a particular program accessibility request regarding curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? if so, explain... 7. Are you aware of the procedure for dealing with an accessibility complaint or claim of discrimination from a person with a disability regarding curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? If so, outline it below... 8. Have you or your colleagues received training on how to deal with issues relating to people with disabilities and the issues related to accessible curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? If so, explain... 9. On a separate sheet of paper, list all of the renovation, alteration and new construction projects related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets built for or under the authority of your division/department after January 26, 1992 - this list must include repaving projects, streets, sidewalks, curb ramp modification projects, pedestrian bridges or other pedestrian circulation projects. ADA Self Evaluation Questionnaire far Streets and Sidewalks -County of Hawaii "Qualified" sign language interpreters can typically speak 4 languages fluently: a. American Sign Language b. Finger spelling in English c. Oral Interpretation (lip reading) d Spoken English TDD17TYdevices are little computer -like text telephones that are used to type messages over the phone lines to another similar device that can read and can type messages back - some have printouts of the conversation for use in the future and there is a special "short hand" used during the calls. TDD stands for Telecommunication Device for the Deaf and TTY means Tele -typewriter. A relatively recent development in communication aids for people who read Braille is the ability to translate in "real time" the information that others would see as text on a personal computer screen - therefor, information available on text bulletin boards or on computer disks or on the Worldwide Web (internet) is now available to many blind people who would otherwise have to have hard copies ofdocuments printed by Braille printers. Alternate Formats for printed documents include... a. Large Print Documents (>I6 pt.) b. Braille Printing c. Computer Disks d Audio Tapes e. Computer Bulletin Board displays Auxiliary aids and services for those with speech or hearing impairments include... a. Qualified Sign Language Interpreters I. "Real Time" Transcription c. Note taking (not good for critical situations) d. Open or Closed Captioning e. Assistive Listening Devices f. TDD/TTY Telephone Devices g. Telephone Relay Services Communications Issues 1. Is there a policy or procedure for addressing a request for a qualified sign language interpreter for people who have speech or hearing impairments and desire to conduct business or benefit from a program or activity relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets offered by your division/department? If so, explain... 2. How would a call relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets from a deaf person who uses a TDD/TTY be dealt with in your office? 3. Is there a way that some of the information that is made available to those who benefit from your activities relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets could be placed on computer disks, a bulletin board or on a web site for access by those who might not otherwise have access to that information? If so, explain... 4. Are documents published for or by your division and relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets made available in "alternate formats" for people that might not be able to read the standard printed documents? If so, explain... 5. Is there a policy or procedure for addressing a request for an auxiliary aid, device or service for people who have speech or hearing impairments and desire to conduct business or benefit from a program or activity relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets and offered by your division/department? If so, explain... ADA Self Evaluation Questionnairefor Streets and Sidewalks -County of Hawaii Auxiliary aids and services for those with visual impairments include... a. Large Print Documents (> 16 pt.) b. Braille Printing c. Computer Disks d Audio Tapes e. Computer Bulletin Board displays f. Readers to read material g. Audio Description of Performances h. Assistants for Guided Description ofltems i. Staff Assistance with Wayfinding Auxiliary aids and services for those with cognitive disabilities (learning disabilities, mental retardation, head injuries, etc.) include... a. Staff Assistance with Wayfinding b. Readers to read material c. Instructions in simple graphics/pictograms d Simple repetitive signage and area designations e. Patience on the part of Staff f Calm, clear, non patronizing Staff Directions One of the most worrisome aspects of independent travel by those with hearing impairment is being in a secluded area ofa building when there is an emergency situation like afire or bomb threat. Independent travel by many people who are blind is complicated by the element of confusion present in many emergency evacuation situations. Assistive listening devices are used by people with hearing impairments to amplify audible communication during a meeting or performance. There area host of different systems (infrared, hardwired, FM units, etc.) available for this use. Again, it is important that people with disabilities be given the same opportunities to benefit from the services or activities offered by the County. 6. Is there a policy or procedure for addressing a request for an auxiliary aid, device or service for people who have visual impairments and desire to conduct business or benefit from a program or activity related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets and offered by your division/department? If so, explain... 7. Is there a policy or procedure for addressing a request for an auxiliary aid, device or service for people who have cognitive disabilities and desire to conduct business or benefit from a program or activity related to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets and offered by your division/department? If so, explain... 8. How are people informed of an emergency situation that might arise while visiting your offices to conduct business relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets? 9. Are there special assistive listening devices available for meetings relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets conducted by your staff in rooms where public address systems are utilized? If so, what types... 10. Do you print maps, reports, books or other documents relating to curb ramps, sidewalks, or streets that are available to the public? If so, list them... Accessible alternate means of communication of 11. Do you make public announcements or legally notify the announcements and legal notices include... public about projects, meetings, etc. related to curb ramps, a. newspaper sidewalks, or streets? b. large print mailings If so, how are they made? c. distribution to disability organizations d computer bulletin boards e. radio reader services ofpublic radio f TV and Radio PSA service ADA Self Evaluation Queslionnaire far Streets and Sidewalks -County of Hawaii Appendix B Attendance Sheets for Public Meetings Held on October 16 and 17, 1998 § LU g _ n \ ) bE 2 } j\K\[ U -E=!#8 2<2300a z/)/F§# / -Es -CL =>- zy oB�, ES 4E§#g z==mom=m ozz-ao U(-)<< �-' - )(ƒ]/ )_ << ) \ \ LLy § < 7 a § s } 91 /p/ x \ �� 0 I � � 3 @ ± a © � j\f\% § s } 91 @ ' $ � Vƒ* \ .c U) 5 / j | g U) ' < a <L E( Lu /J\0 *3LLf2O 2f${a-? § %4 eLL±g§§. 4 ¥ k°=zo!\ xee;�2 r� /&\Cama . � } L)U<< � / u/ e g 2 §_ En) / 7< § 5 § { k $ \ \ LL } / \ j \ \ _ \ \ � � § * |\ � ��_ $ Q N � � Q Z a 3 ✓�4 N Y LU U) Z a U) °°� ; Lw LUazz 0 LUm m _ W -~m N �aJO� Q U 1U �p]LL°moi zaaZJ''on, O=va Eos Q Q lLESad N^ O= �YF-ZOomd dO M O FZ- . 2 co Z M M z :D (D p� U X UO , M — O Z Z E W V UUaaZ n U= m ¢ F- Y d w 0 2z az a O O O 0 F- a ? a Z) d > LLI o Cj LL LU LU E E v 1 2 v E m p?p (h JZco -Smr a �1 Americans with Disabilities Act Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps A Schedule For Providing Curb Ramps For Persons With Disabilities Prepared For: County of Hawaii Department of Public Works Prepared By: Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. and Bill Hecker, AIA — Accessibility Consultant Hecker Design, Ltd. May 24, 1999 N y EXHIBIT Americans With Disabilities Act Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps A Schedule for Providing Curb Ramps for Persons with Disabilities Prepared for: County of Hawaii Department of Public Works 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Prepared by: Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. Engineers and Planners 1907 South Beretania Street, Suite 400 Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 (808) 946-2277 and Bill Hecker, AIA — Accessibility Consultant Hecker Design, Ltd. 3568 Hampshire Drive Birmingham, Alabama 35226 (205) 298-1900 v/tty May 24, 1999 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................................... i 1. Background and Purpose.................................................................................................. 1 1.1 ADA Compliance Requirements.................................................................................. 1 1.2 Program Accessibility Concept..................................................................................... 1 1.3 Program Access............................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Transition Plan Requirements....................................................................................... 3 2. Project Methodology......................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Orientation Phase.......................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1 Scope of Field Survey........................................................................................... 4 2.1.2 ADA Standards..................................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Information Needs................................................................................................ 5 2.1.4 Evaluation Protocols and Survey Instruments...................................................... 6 2.1.5 Survey of Disability Community.......................................................................... 9 2.2 Survey Phase............................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Implementation Analysis Phase.................................................................................. 11 2.4 Report Preparation Phase............................................................................................ 15 3. Schedule for Implementation.......................................................................................... 15 3.1 Detailed Schedule of Intersections and Priorities... .................................................... 16 LIST OF TABLES Page Table I Proposed 6 -Year Transition Plan Funding Allocation ........................................... ii Table 2 Weighted Ranking By Priority Factor................................................................. 12 APPENDICES Appendix A List of Intersections Surveyed Appendix B Implementation Schedule Summary Appendix C Sign -In Sheets, Su nmary Minutes, and Comment Letter from the April 6 and 7, 1999 Public Information Meetings Appendix D Architectural Access Committee "Technical Infeasibility" Statement Form Appendix E Master Coding and Recommendations Lists Appendix F HCIL Curb Cut Installation Priority Study Findings & Flyer for Study Input Appendix G Sample of Surveyors' Field Notes, Sketch, Large -Scale Curb Ramp Model, Recommendation Form and Photo Log Sheet Appendix H Intersections with Technically Infeasible Features Appendix I U.S. Dept of Justice Technical Assistance Letter on Curb Ramps #0149 Appendix J Detailed Implementation Schedule ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps EXECUTIVE SUMMARY What is the ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan? ADA stands for the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, a very far-reaching federal civil rights law for people with disabilities. This Transition Plan is a schedule for the installation of new curb ramps and the modification of existing curb ramps to ensure that "program accessibility" is provided for disabled users of sidewalks within County of Hawaii public rights- of-way. Why is the County doing this work now; haven't there been curb ramps around for years? This work is required as part of the settlement agreement made with plaintiffs who alleged that the County's efforts to ensure "program accessibility" were insufficient under the ADA. Earlier efforts to install curb ramps for ADA compliance were made by the County, but it was a request - based process for determining the number and location of curb ramps to be installed. While the ADA requires the County to address requests, the regulations also require a more "proactive" or strategic approach to curb ramp installation, which this plan provides. With regard to the existing curb ramps along sidewalks, many do not comply with the ADA Accessibility Guidelines — a newer design standard than those used during the 1970's and 1980's. Of these non-compliant curb ramps, many will need to be modified or even replaced. When is the County required to have these new curb ramps installed? The County must adopt the ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan and its associated document, the ADA Self Evaluation for Streets and Sidewalks by July 2, 1999 to comply with the court's order. Implementation of the Self Evaluation recommendations should begin immediately thereafter, and the settlement agreement allows for a 6 -year implementation period (ending July 2, 2005) for curb ramp work. i ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Specifically what does the ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan propose? A total of 669 intersections were surveyed by the ADA consultants, Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. and Hecker Design, Ltd. (see Appendix A). Those intersections requiring new curb ramps or modification of existing ramps were ranked in priority based upon a range of factors relating to their use by individuals with disabilities. According to this priority ranking and cost estimate for individual improvements, 308 intersections should be modified over the fiscal years 2000 — 2005 at a total projected cost of $6,261,500.00 (1998 dollars), as shown in the table below. Table 1 PROPOSED 6 -PEAR TRANSITION PLAN FUNDING ALLOCATION Fiscal Year No. Intersections Estimated Cost 2000 39 $1,084,500.00 2001 26 $1,110,000.00 2002 53 $1,016,000.00 2003 60 $1,064,500.00 2004 53 $1,086,000.00 2005 77 $900,500.00 TOTALS 308 $6,261,500.00 Note: Estimated costs are expressed in 1998 dollars The implementation schedule for the curb ramp modifications is summarized in Appendix B and documents the breakdown of costs between the intersection modifications originally scheduled and those modifications to intersections without existing curb ramps requested during the public comment period. The costs are tabulated by fiscal year and are grouped by the Tax Map Key (TMK) Zones of the County of Hawaii. The tables indicate the range of the overall priority rating of intersections in each TMK Zone, as well as the quantity of intersections scheduled for modification and their associated cost estimate. In addition, each table includes a 20% contingency cost that is intended to coves unexpected site conditions that may require additional ii ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps engineering analyses, as well as curb ramp modifications based on individual requests that are not scheduled for modification in the transition plan or are needed earlier than scheduled. Who should be contacted to obtain more information about this project? Mr. Norman Olesen is the County ADA Coordinator. He is the appropriate person to contact for information regarding this ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan, and can be reached at (808) 961- 8565 or (808) 961-8521 v/tty. ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps 1. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE 1.1 ADA Compliance Requirements This report was prepared for the County of Hawaii (County) in partial fulfillment of the implementing regulations for Title II of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) (28 CFR 35.105(a)), and the Consent Decree and Order filed in Russell et. al. v. County of Hawaii (USDC Civil No. 97-00379 DAE - October 5, 1997). This report addresses one of five responsibilities of the ADA for state and local governments relative to streets and sidewalks, including: 1. A Self Evaluation of policies and practices related to streets and sidewalks; 2. The new construction requirements of ADA related to streets and sidewalks; 3. Alteration requirements for streets and sidewalks; 4. Requests for program accommodations related to streets and sidewalks; and, 5. A Curb Ramp Transition Plan. With the exception of Items 2 and 3 regarding the new construction and alteration requirements of the ADA, which deal strictly with design and construction, the other responsibilities address specific non-discrimination prohibitions and "program accessibility" as discussed below. 1.2 Program Accessibility Concept The concept of program accessibility originated with the requirements of Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and, along with the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is at the core of the non- discrimination provisions of ADA. Program accessibility is also the primary consideration for curb ramp modifications addressed in this Transition Plan. The intent of program accessibility is stated in the following excerpt from the implementing regulations of the ADA: I ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps "Except as otherwise provided in 35.150, no qualified individual with a disability shall, because a public entity's facilities are inaccessible to or unusable by individuals with disabilities, be excluded from participation in, or be denied the benefits of the services, programs or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any public entity. " 28 CFR 35.149 Program Accessibility Curb ramps and sidewalks fall under the very broad definition of "facilities" mentioned in the excerpt above and, therefore, are covered as part of the program accessibility requirement of ADA. The reference to section 35.150 ties this requirement to additional compliance concepts that are critical to the planning and implementation of curb ramp modifications. 1.3 Program Access The concept of "viewed in its entirety" provides the context for evaluating the need of modifications for the purposes of program accessibility. Section 35.150 of the ADA regulations requires that the County's services, programs, and activities be accessible to individuals with disabilities "when viewed in its entirety". With respect to the County's streets and sidewalks, the program can be seen as the network of "improved pedestrian circulation routes". Item 1 of the regulations excerpted below indicates that not every street corner with a sidewalk requires a curb ramp as long as program accessibility is provided "when viewed in its entirety" or when the entire network of sidewalks is considered. Additionally, the limitations pertaining to historic facilities, fundamental alterations and undue financial and administrative burdens offer some flexibility in determining which intersections need to be modified. The limitation related to "technical infeasibility" will be presented later in this report, since it relates to how a new accessible feature can be installed into an existing sidewalk with specific site characteristics that prevent full compliance with the ADA Standards for Accessible Design, in this case the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). "A public entity shall operate each service, program or activity so that the service, program or activity, when viewed in its entirety, is readily accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities. This paragraph does not: ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps 1. Necessarily require a public entity to make each of its existing facilities accessible to and usable by individuals with disabilities; 2. Require apublic entity to take an action that would threaten or destroy the historic significance ofan historic property; or, 3. Require a public entity to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of a service, program, or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens... If an action would result in an alteration or such burdens, a public entity shall take any other action that would not result in such an alteration or such burdens but would nevertheless ensure that individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services provided by the public entity." Section 35.150 Existing Facilities [emphasis added] 1.4 Transition Plan Requirements The regulations require that the Transition Plan report include at least the following elements: 1. A list of physical barriers in the public entity's facilities (improved pedestrian circulation route system) that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities; 2. A description of the methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible; 3. A specific schedule identifying steps that will be taken each year of the transition plan period (6 years as stipulated in the Consent Decree); and, 4. Which official will be responsible for the implementation of the plan. Toward meeting these requirements (particularly for Item 1) it was necessary to collect supporting data. Among these were: physical characteristics of existing curb ramps and sidewalks; location of the intersections relative to key governmental or commercial facilities; pedestrian use patterns; density of population around the intersection; and, potential safety concerns to disabled users. Public participation is also required inasmuch as interested parties, including individuals with disabilities and/or organizations that represent individuals with disabilities, must be given an opportunity to participate in the development of the plan by offering comments. Public 3 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps information meetings were conducted on April 6 and 7, 1999 in Kona, Waimea and Hilo, respectively, to present the survey methodology and scope of the Transition Plan. Comments received after the meetings, together with sign -in sheets and summary minutes, are included as Appendix C. In addition, the methodology will also be presented at the "Conference on Disability Access" held in Honolulu May 11-12, 1999. The Conference was sponsored by the State Commission on Persons with Disabilities and featured many workshops on disability issues. One of the workshops was conducted by the consultants and presented design issues related to sidewalk accessibility. 2. PROJECT METHODOLOGY The project methodology was organized into four phases including: 1. Orientation Phase; 2. Survey Phase; 3. Implementation Analysis Phase; and, 4. Report Preparation Phase. 2.1 Orientation Phase The orientation phase of the Transition Plan allowed for the determination of the scope of the survey, the ADA standard to be used, the range of information to be collected, the protocols and instruments needed to collect that information, the computerized database to be used to process the information and the needs of the disability community based on an independent survey. 2.1.1 Scope of Field Survey The first task was to determine the scope of the survey. Since pedestrian access on streets and sidewalks under the County's jurisdiction has been defined as an ADA program by the Department of Justice, those streets and sidewalks needed to be identified. A comprehensive review of all streets on the Island of Hawaii was conducted to identify those under County 0 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps jurisdiction, as opposed to those under private, State and Federal jurisdiction. Streets under County jurisdiction were identified on a map that served as the basis for conducting the field survey. Intersections of County streets with State highways were excluded from the survey, in most cases, because such intersections are typically within the State right-of-way. Federal roads are not covered by the ADA program access mandate. 2.1.2 ADA Standards The second task was to select the ADA design standards to be used for the survey from either the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) or the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS). While both are acceptable for compliance with the ADA, and they are similar in most respects, the ADAAG was selected since these proposed modifications would be subject to review by the State Commission on Persons with Disabilities. The Commission's Architectural Access Committee has patterned their design standard after the ADAAG (see Appendix D). 2.1.3 Information Needs The third task was to determine the range of inforniation to be collected in the field surveys. In general, information was collected at all potential pedestrian crossings, predominantly at intersections with marked crosswalks, as well as at mid -block crossings. Three classifications of pedestrian conditions at street crossings were identified as requiring different levels of information: 1. Crossing locations with no sidewalks — Labeled "Blue" for surveying purposes, these are intersections not served by sidewalks. The absence of sidewalks is interpreted as an absence of a program for pedestrians and, therefore, would not be subject to the ADA requirements for program accessibility. No information would be required except to note their locations for future reference. 3 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps 2. Crossing locations with no curb ramps — Labeled "Red" for surveying purposes, these crossings are served by sidewalks but have no curb ramps. These crossings are subject to the requirements of ADA program accessibility and could require the installation of curb ramps. Information required from these crossings include their location, conditions that could affect the installation of curb ramps, the relative priority for installing curb ramps at the location and an order -of -magnitude cost estimate for installing the curb ramps. 3. Crossing locations with curb ramps — Labeled "Green" for surveying purposes, these crossings are served by existing curb ramps that may or may not be compliant. These curb ramps are subject to the ADA program accessibility duty. Hence, detailed information regarding compliance with ADAAG standards was needed, as well as information on conditions that could affect proposed solutions. Also, as in the case of the "Red" crossings, information on its location, relative priority for implementation, potential safety issues and order -of -magnitude cost estimates is required. A reconnaissance survey of every potential street crossing under the jurisdiction of the County of Hawaii was conducted to allow surveyors to classify them into one of the three classifications. Over 700 intersections, many of which included several street crossings at comers or mid -block, were surveyed and classified. 2.1.4 Evaluation Protocols and Survey Instruments The fourth task was to develop survey protocols and instruments for systematically recording the information collected for the respective classifications. Except for the "Blue" intersections with no sidewalks, protocols for the "Red" and "Green" crossings were developed for collecting information on their relative priority, site conditions that could affect implementation, recommendations and cost estimates. rt ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Two general priority categories were established, including one pertaining to the demand for program accessibility at all "Red" and "Green" crossings, and the other pertaining to the severity of conditions posing obstacles or safety hazards at existing curb ramps at "Green" crossings. With respect to the demand for program accessibility at both "Red" and "Green" crossings, several categories of information were included in the field survey forms. The broadest of these concerned destinations and included two priority categories: • P1 Areas - High Priority Areas (governmental, schools, hospitals/health services, retail services, commercial services, recreation, religious institutions, visitor attractions, museums, and high density residential); and, • P2 Areas - Secondary Priority Areas (low-density/single-family residential, parks, rural areas and agricultural areas). Within these categories, additional information was collected in the field as to the specific type of destinations located in the block served by these crossings. Related to the destination categories is information characterizing the general location of a particular crossing with respect to the magnitude of the population being served. For example, a retail area within Kailua-Kona would be a higher priority destination than one in Waimea, based upon the volume of customers served. Five categories of location information were collected in the field, including: Downtown Areas (i.e.: the Hilo Central Business District, and Kailua-Kona), Metropolitan Areas (i.e.: urban areas outside the CBD, such as Waiakea, Keaau, Waimea, Honokaa, etc.), Small Town Areas (i.e.: Pahoa, Mountain View, Kealakekua, etc.) and Other Areas (i.e.: Naalehu, Kohala, Kawaihae, etc.). ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps To account for the level of pedestrian activity at a particular location that may not be reflected by the type of destination or general location, a final characterization based on the observed level of pedestrian activity was included. Four descriptors ranging from "light" to "very heavy" were provided. A potential category for access to public transit was omitted since the County of Hawaii does not operate a fixed route bus service. For the "Green" street crossings that have existing curb ramps, an additional priority category was developed relating to the degree of inconvenience, impediment or potential safety hazard a disabled user might encounter. Referred to as the "severity code" this priority allows for flexibility in the program accessibility concept of the ADA by dividing the barriers into minor, significant and potentially hazardous categories. The existing conditions were thus characterized in the field reports as one of the following: • MI — Major Inconvenience to disabled users of this element; • BA— Blocks Access for disabled users of this element; or, • PSH — Potential Safety Hazard for disabled users of this element. With regard to information collected on existing conditions at a crossing, the difference between the "Red" crossings, where there were no curb ramps, and the "Green" crossings, with existing curb ramps, was significant. At "Red" crossings, the basic recommendation would be to install a new curb ramp. To identify potential limitations on installing the new ramp, conditions such as utility poles, utility "pull boxes", drainage facilities, and fire hydrants were noted in a sketch. For future reference, digital photographs were taken according to a protocol assuring that pertinent conditions were recorded. At "Greed' crossings, an extensive checklist of 74 attributes was used to identify specific deficiencies, including those that determine the "severity rating" discussed earlier (see Appendix E). ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Recommendations for modifications at "Red" crossings were fairly straightforward in that a new curb ramp was typically recommended. In some cases, however, existing conditions indicated that the installation of a curb ramp may be "technically infeasible" as defined by the ADA. For field survey purposes, potentially infeasible conditions were noted for further investigation. For the "Green" crossings, modifications to existing curb ramps were recommended based upon correcting specific non -complying elements, where appropriate. If potentially infeasible issues were identified, a notation was made for further investigation. Order -of -magnitude cost estimates were developed for categories of modifications ranging from the installation of a new curb ramp to making corrections to non -complying features, as determined from the field recommendations. These cost estimates were derived primarily from the most recent curb ramp projects conducted in other counties of the State. The fifth task was to develop a computerized database in which to store, process and recall the various information collected. The computer program selected for this task was Microsoft's ACCESS database. This program offers the flexibility to sort extensive data in a variety of ways to facilitate development of alternative implementation strategies, to call up information on specific crossings during the implementation phase and to track the progress of required modifications. This program is also compatible with Geographic Information System (GIS) computer database applications that would allow interactive map -based searching to facilitate project management. Further data input would be required to link the ADA curb ramp information and digital photographs to a GIS system. 2.1.5 Survey of Disability Community The sixth and final task was to obtain information from those in the disabled community regarding their views on critical destinations, including information on current sidewalk use patterns and issues important to this affected community. The information was needed to help 61 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps determine general priorities for implementation. During an earlier curb ramp transition plan project for the City and County of Honolulu, the assistance of the Hawaii Centers for Independent Living (HCIL) was enlisted in the development of a polling tool or survey, which was distributed by the HCIL through their extensive mailing list. The survey was also distributed at the "Tools for Life Expo' held in March 1998. The findings of the survey were presented at a January 24, 1998 public information meeting held in Honolulu to describe the curb ramp survey methodology used in that project. That methodology is similar to the one used for this project (see Appendix F). 2.2 Survey Phase The survey phase involved the allocation of manpower to collect the required information as determined in the orientation phase. Survey crews with engineering training were dispatched to the both "Red" and "Green" intersections which required the technical skills necessary to determine compliance, make recommendations for modifications and to identify physical constraints that may limit those modifications (see Appendix G). In addition, when an apparent "technically infeasible" feature was identified, these were reserved for further review by the lead ADA consultant. Most of these elements will require special design attention during the implementation phase. It should be noted that while conditions indicating potential technical infeasibility were identified in the field, final determination of infeasibility will need to be made during a more thorough engineering analysis when far more specific site data can be collected. This means that some of the recommendations made in this report may be found to be impossible to implement, but regardless of those findings, accessible modifications should be made to extent that they are feasible. To that end, a design protocol manual should be developed by the consultants for use during the implementation phase when more specific site data are available. This design protocol would best be developed with the participation of the Commission on Persons with Disabilities, since they will have design review responsibilities during the implementation phase. 10 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps The goal of the design protocol will be to confirm and expand upon the surveyors' field observations and to determine which factors may be cited when site feasibility is in question. Numerous examples of acceptable design alternatives will be documented to ensure consistency among many curb ramp designers. The field survey process yielded the following information: A. 640 Intersections with sidewalks; B. 1,907 Individual elements (i.e.: curb ramps, island cuts, etc.); C. 1,036 Corners with sidewalks but no curb ramps; D. 249 P1 Intersections; E. 391 P2 Intersections; F. 524 Individual elements with infeasible approach slope(s) >_ 5% and <12%; G. 127 Individual elements with infeasible and potentially unsafe approach slope(s) >_ 12%; H. 129 PI intersections with special design considerations; I. 126 P2 intersections with special design considerations; In addition the surveyors: J. Took over 2,500 digital photographs; and K. Made over 18,000 individual measurements 2.3 Implementation Analysis Phase Following the collection and inputting of field data into the computer database, the data was analyzed. This included sorting the data by established criteria to determine the schedule for implementation. Criteria used in sorting included those shown in Table 2 below, which were weighted to reflect the most critical factors for pedestrians with disabilities. The determination of these weighted priority elements was made by evaluating the HCIL survey results, the criteria in the Title II regulations (28 CFR 35.150(d)(2)), and the Consent Decree. Based on this weighted scale, a single score between 4 and 23 was derived for each intersection. 11 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps This score was then used to sort the data and rank the intersections for the installation of curb ramps. The higher the score, the higher the priority for implementation within the 6 -year schedule. Table 2 WEIGHTED RANKING BY PRIORITY FACTOR Weighted Category Description Value Pedestrian Traffic Very Heavy 6 Heavy 5 Moderate 2 Light 1 Bus Route Traffic Heavy 5 (Not Applicable) Moderate 3 Light 1 No Bus Service 0 Destination Priority Governmental 6 Retail/Hospital/Health 5 Recreatioa/Churches/Museums/Tourist 4 Schools/Universities 4 Condos/Multi-family Residential 3 Commercial Services/Industrial 2 One & Two Family Residential 1 Severity Priority Potential Safety Hazard 7 Blocks Access 0 Major Inconvenience 0 Location Downtown Area 4 Metropolitan Area 3 Small Town 2 Other Areas 1 After the total priority list for all intersections was made, two additional sorts were conducted to arrive at the final list of projects for the Transition Plan. The first of these two sorts was made to cull certain elements that could not feasibly be constructed to comply with the ADAAG requirements for slopes. Basically, it is "technically infeasible" to install a 1:12 ramp at an existing sidewalk with an approach slope of 5% or greater (see Appendix H). To do so would 12 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps require an overly long (greater than 12 feet) ramp run. As guidance for this determination, the published Interim Final Rule — ADAAG Chapter 14 (38 CFR 1191) stipulates at Section 14.2.4(5) that curb ramps running in the direction of the existing sidewalk should be designed to slope no more than 1:12, but need not exceed eight feet in length regardless of the slope of the ramp. To provide a more conservative interpretation of "technically infeasibility", a maximum ramp length of 12 feet was used and, given existing limitations, designers will be allowed up to a 1:10 slope for ramps that rise only 6 inches in height or 1:8 for ramps rising only 3 inches in height per ADAAG 4.1.6(3). This interpretation does not preclude individuals with disabilities from making requests to the County for curb ramps at these "technically infeasible" locations if reasonable need can be demonstrated. The second sort was made to minimize the exceedingly high cost of installing curb ramps at every intersection in residential areas, regardless of whether a person with disabilities lives in those areas. This position is based on the technical assistance letters of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) that are available for review on the World Wide Web site http://www.usdoa.gov/crt/foia/ta1049.txt (see Appendix I). In the Technical Assistance letter #0149, the DOJ states the following in response to an inquiry of the Association of City Employees with Disabilities — Los Angeles: "In residential areas, as opposed to commercial areas, it may be appropriate to establish a procedure for installing curb ramps upon request when an individual with disabilities moves into a neighborhood Moreover, the fundamental alteration and undue burden defenses will limit the number of curb ramps required in many cases. In developing a transition plan to provide curb ramps, a public entity should consider all of these.factors. " This DOJ position statement does not mean, however, that none of the intersections in residential areas will be modified to have curb ramps. If an intersection in a residential area were to be on a bus route, had a feature that was cited as a potential safety hazard, or served a school or park, it was identified as needing new curb ramps in the Transition Plan. Additionally, there are two 13 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps other ways that an individual intersection may be modified through the ADA compliance process: 1. Needs based requests by an individual with disabilities who would benefit from program accessibility accommodations; and, 2. When residential streets are resurfaced, or otherwise altered as defined by ADA, curb ramps will be installed along with other accessibility modifications as required, up to the apparent regulatory maximum of 20% of the value of the alteration costs. It is important to note that the alteration provisions of ADA do not specify prioritization of existing barrier removal under the program access concept. In fact, this is where the shift in ADA takes place from the flexible "program accessibility" model to the rigid alteration requirements. Notably, as regularly scheduled street resurfacing projects are completed between fiscal years 2000 — 2005, some curb ramps scheduled for modification under the Transition Plan will actually be enveloped into the scope of work of those resurfacing projects. Reductions in cost for these curb ramps has not been deducted from the Transition Plan estimate since there is no way of knowing how much money will be spent on resurfacing each year and where that money will be spent. Any surplus might wisely be considered as contingency funding for modifications requested by individuals with disabilities, as needed. The last factor involved in the final determination of the schedule for curb ramp modifications resulted from public input received during the comment period. Several disabled pedestrians who attended the public information meetings were insistent that funding for the Transition Plan be divided between modifying comers with non-compliant curb ramps and installing new ramps at corners or crossings with no curb ramps. Some who attended the Hilo public information meeting recommended a 75% - 25% split of annual planned funding with the larger figure accounting for installing new curb ramps. The reasoning stated at the public meetings and in informal follow-up discussions was that they felt most of the existing curb ramps were usable 14 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps and it would be more efficient to spend the money making unusable crossings accessible. A compromise was achieved whereby roughly 50% of the annual funding for the Transition Plan would be spent on strategic intersection modifications where non-compliant curb ramps exist and 50% would be spent on installing new curb ramps at corners that have no curb ramps. This would not change the overall number of intersections scheduled for accessibility modifications, but it alters the overall priority schedule to better reflect local disability concerns. It should be noted that the ranking for both the modifications and the new ramps are based on the priority schedule described previously in order to ensure compliance with the intent of the ADA and the court order. 2.4 Report Preparation Phase This phase of the Transition Plan process documents the data collected and the analysis made of that data. The Transition Plan report describes the project background, methodology, and schedule for implementing the curb ramp modifications. It includes a schedule for modifications to curb ramps to ensure program access to the pedestrian circulation route, when viewed in its entirety. In essence, the actual working Transition Plan is the computer database. The database is a document, to be used by the County to track the progress of the work and document the modifications made. It will serve as a tool to manage the implementation process, as well as all the construction and design work associated with the implementation. During the review and comment period, printed copies of the database were made available for viewing at selected public libraries. Alternate formats of the report were available upon request. 3. SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTATION The implementation schedule for curb ramp transition plan modifications is summarized and tabulated in Appendix B. The tables are divided into six fiscal years and are segregated by the TMK Zones of the County. The intersections in each fiscal year are ranked by the weighted ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps priority ranking system with the overall priority rating shown and divided into two lists — "Green" intersections where all comers have existing curb ramps, and "Red" intersections where at least one comer has no curb ramp at all. Also presented in the tables (Appendix J) is the range of the overall priority rating of intersections in each TMK Zone, as well as the quantity of intersections scheduled for modifications and associated cost estimates. The total estimated cost for implementation and contingency amounts are summarized for each proposed fiscal year. The proposed contingency amount is intended to include unforeseen site conditions or concerns that may require additional engineering analyses, as well as curb ramp modifications based on individual requests that are not scheduled for modification in the transition plan. 3.1 Detailed Schedule of Intersections and Priorities A detailed listing of specific intersections that include curb ramp modifications is presented in Appendix J. The list was prepared by dividing the total estimated cost associated with curb ramp modifications in the transition plan into six implementation fiscal years. The first year list (Fiscal Year 2000), includes intersections with the greatest priority ranking as determined by the individual priority factors assigned to each intersection among the "Red" and "Green" intersection divisions. Within each list or fiscal year block, intersections are further subcategorized by TMK Zone. 16 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix A List of Intersections Surveyed ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps How to Read This List List of Intersections Surveyed The following is a list of intersections surveyed under the ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan. The data is shown in columns that are defined as follows: Column I - Intersection Identification Number (Example: 680339) 6- TMK Zone number R - Letter used to identify the surveyor for that intersection 0339- Intersection number Columns 2 — 7 Addresses and names of cross streets at the intersection. The streets are listed alphabetically by the first letter of the street name and not by the relative size or traffic volume associated with the streets. Column 2 Address 1 Column 3 Cross Street 1 Column 4 Address 2 Column 5 Cross Street 2 Column 6 Address 3 Column 7 Cross Street 3 Column 8 - Identifies a mid -block crossing Column 9 - Date of survey Column 10 - Priority Area For a more detailed explanation of the priority categories, see Section 2.1.4 of the narrative — Evaluation Protocols and Survey Instruments. 0 w W D Z 0 U LU w W Z LL 0 J w m m m m m a m m m m m y m m m m m m m m m m m m m m? m C C C C C C C C C C m C O m C A m Cd m m W m aRd aKd vd vd od ad ad pd ad pd aN aN a 4 v a v a a a g6NCN C EE >E a aCN� d K a K Kx K � K - (C NaC 00 0mU m x 0.' K W a C� KO apd� amc` , m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m md m m m m1-0 n i IN 1- Z- O OO O zzz O O OOO 0 zzy NOO zzzzzyzzzzzzz}>zzz>z0z O O OON zznO O O O O 010 O y 0 0 0 y0zz zz a1 0 II o YYY> in �m_mo IQ !I W o SII > 2 N i d d? d a a a E p 3 C Q m I O C = J m m d m m Y L d d d .13 ?d L d d d d m m m m d C C m d m Y = L Y E E Y 'N 'ry m O C E E Y L .0 L L > .t 4 Y Y W m C C d d ._ L y m= J Y O m Q d a d d Q Y ]C M m m d d Q m m p C L= 6 d m m m Y= O O L L m L_ S S L r Y y 3 S S— 3 d O Y Y Q Q Y YIn Z Z d Y 1 d d d I � O O B O O > > > > > > ' > , > > > > > a a J a MIM a d d d L L L t p J= C C C m m m m m m Q Q Q I Q Q Q Q Q Q¢ Q Q Y m m m m _ m {Ep .n '.I m p L Q L Q L Q d L d L d L LIQ y L Q L Q L Q J J J d d d d d d O O O p O O O I O O O O O Q Q Q Q Q Q d Q Q Q Q L Q Q Q m C m C m C m C m C m C m m m m m m m' m m m m m Q C C C 'a C C C C C C C C 'a C 'a a a a a a a a ¢ T D'thM Qm pp mlh000,Mm pp �s}� ^ W�<N ON:O �p N Wm m OmDIOOim 1 OIOV V:OOO<VI:ONO OO yy m 0 n 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 IN 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N O O N O N O N O N" O O O O N O N O N O N O N O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m IO.N m YIN N Y 0 0 O O - m N NIN N NIY n n nN N N:O N IO ION NN N N N N N'N NI'N N N z z z z z1 z z y z z z z z z z z z z z z z1 z z z z z z1 z z z z z zl0 z z Lo W W W W W W l0 W W l0 W W W W W W l0 (0 {p W W W W 1p 1p W W L W W W W W CW CW CW C O .W 2 W .W 2 2 2 i _W WC W W W W W W W 0 W W aC aC oC ,C2E a aE E E E Ec E2pLW NO N _ KKKKKN a. KK K K K w a w K K K jK UU 0 pW, c a` I, m In m m m m rn m m o m m m rn m m m Qi m rn m m m rn rn In m m rn m rn m m m m m m rn m m m m �i m m m m °D m m rn rn rn rn nom rn N m O N M � Q z z z z z1 z z y z z z z z z z z z z z z z1 z z z z z z1 z z z z z zl0 z z m 0 D o` > c 0 W o W W W W W a W W m m d W t c W W o W L W d �' o c 3 m a E E m m t m W2 'm mJ m mm 'm �^ m Y n m W W c c o 3 0 o W y J W O W W W y W Y Y Y Y O y W Y E W W 0 W C O W O% m y Y W Y; 0=_ ?� E Q= W J E E W W o Y q = W E O W m c_ Y Z Y Y 'a a¢ Y Y Y Y a w Y J Y Z J 3 Y Q o= m c c LL >> ._ W a N W W W W U LLI m W W a c LL a ¢¢ c t 'ss LL' Y d J J W LL' d 0 o W W W t0 J a W W W J J J J J {p N W W J W W W y 41 W Y c W a 0 0 0 O Y Y 0 0 0 0 6 W Y Y Y W W W W W J J Y W Y y Y Y J W W W W W W J W O C W— W W W W Y W Y Y Y Y Y N W W W W Y p a W N Q a Q Q L r c a Y y_- a<< a a a¢ a¢ a Q¢ a¢ a a Q¢ a< ¢¢ a a a a a a o< a a a¢¢ N [+I IXt m r N �O m N N m 10 Q N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 MO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. m 0 D o` > c 0 W o W W W W W a W W m m d W t c W W o W L W d �' o c 3 m a E E m m t m W2 'm mJ m mm 'm �^ m Y n m W W c c o 3 0 o W y J W O W W W y W Y Y Y Y O y W Y E W W 0 W C O W O% m y Y W Y; 0=_ ?� E Q= W J E E W W o Y q = W E O W m c_ Y Z Y Y 'a a¢ Y Y Y Y a w Y J Y Z J 3 Y Q o= m c c LL >> ._ W a N W W W W U LLI m W W a c LL a ¢¢ c t 'ss LL' Y d J J W LL' d 0 o W W W t0 J a W W W J J J J J {p N W W J W W W y 41 W Y c W a 0 0 0 O Y Y 0 0 0 0 6 W Y Y Y W W W W W J J Y W Y y Y Y J W W W W W W J W O C W— W W W W Y W Y Y Y Y Y N W W W W Y p a W N Q a Q Q L r c a Y y_- a<< a a a¢ a¢ a Q¢ a¢ a a Q¢ a< ¢¢ a a a a a a o< a a a¢¢ N [+I IXt m r N �O m N N m 10 Q N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 MO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O I O I O I O I O 0 1)0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 mi l O I O I O I O I O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z y} Z Z Z 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 E i lCL l i .I I I 13 I I I, m 9 ❑ L W d' N = ❑ > > a W L c a U o❑ m d❑ Q= a Q N W c L C c J u S c a a a c d d o. o. L a W c a a o y m? m U W M C C m W O W W N W= y J J m Y m C N m L L W m y C W m J N {Oa W m Y la E W j/I m O p W J Y d C '� Y W m C C_ m m y m m 3 W W j O m W O C W¢ O C L J L Y W m �[ a L W W W W y Y Y J¢ s S S = E W Y 3 Q m Y Y Y m o Y J 6 N (1 3¢ W— Y y Y J Z d Y Y Y 3 Y Y W m Y O 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o m m m W m m m W m m m m m m m m❑ W W 0' > . O O D O O O O O O O Oo 0 0 0 o o o o o 0 o o o o o A>> m m.,� y ..E Q Q W W W D c o W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L O Q Q Q E O Q Q Q a a a a¢¢¢¢ a¢ a<< a¢ Q Q a r N 0W. lCm0 v �m UOCCC r V IT N CW a`> N v1 m m m mE n r CWm CW pm E E E E E E v -2 :2 s v v a oapva O th p p O D! E Eaa N N a 4E 0CW �O N �O N T N EE �O N V N E E E E E , E O) W O (O r ['I O w M t7 M (7 U U U U U U U S K K K S a¢ 0 K a 0 K K D: K K 0 K 0 K a K a a K o 0 0 a a a u dUj a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U K K C5 r r r r r n r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N r n N N N a` m ao m m . rn fO m m.. m rn w.. w m m. m m. m. w m m. m. m. m. m m m oa e vQ o' a 'm m —M m v m m m m an, m m rn m m rn m m m rn m m p' n n r m m ao r l m m M W m O I O I O I O I O 0 1)0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 mi l O I O I O I O I O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O Z Z Z Z Z y} Z Z Z 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 E i lCL l i .I I I 13 I I I, m 9 ❑ L W d' N = ❑ > > a W L c a U o❑ m d❑ Q= a Q N W c L C c J u S c a a a c d d o. o. L a W c a a o y m? m U W M C C m W O W W N W= y J J m Y m C N m L L W m y C W m J N {Oa W m Y la E W j/I m O p W J Y d C '� Y W m C C_ m m y m m 3 W W j O m W O C W¢ O C L J L Y W m �[ a L W W W W y Y Y J¢ s S S = E W Y 3 Q m Y Y Y m o Y J 6 N (1 3¢ W— Y y Y J Z d Y Y Y 3 Y Y W m Y O 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ o m m m W m m m W m m m m m m m m❑ W W 0' > . O O D O O O O O O O Oo 0 0 0 o o o o o 0 o o o o o A>> m m.,� y ..E Q Q W W W D c o W Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q L L L L L L L L L L L L L L L O Q Q Q E O Q Q Q a a a a¢¢¢¢ a¢ a<< a¢ Q Q a r N r V IT N N v1 n r O th O O D! Oi N N N r N �O N �O N T N M N �O N V N m N r C N N th t0 r O O) W O r (O r ['I O M t7 M (7 O O C') (+I O C'I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 d' K r r r r r n r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r N N N r n N N N N m ao 0 15 W Z ai ai ti ti ti oa d _3 > ,;<, <,;oa'a'a'a'g d 0 d .=> .a 0 Q L C L [D Q O 3 .� O Q W L L L L W r 1 Q C C n O Q O> W W �p C O L W W W W W C W W W W C W n W W W C 3 W W C Q W W _ 3 E E W o m x x 0 10 e W �^ E E E E W o m ,e E W W ^� m W o 0 0 W E W Z IL/i N >` L L N E W W W W E_ m m m 0 W 0 E E E w__ m W E W _� a W Y L W C C J J .0 ry O L L L L 0 O J J Y L Y E W W W W W W W d Y Y O Y Q Y O Y m Y Y Y m m N m Y Q 3 Y y Y Y = E Y Y Y Y Y i ITA f0 W C W W W W W W W W W W W r m l0 W 6 OI C C W E C C C C C O C 2 W 2 W 2 N 2 0 W C o W 15W W W E E N a W a N N a W a O L W E E E m{ n n o o .n v v m E aW 0 u ,v_ m m w V`E g E E E E E E a W a E E W a E E aNi N N N wo aNi aNi y N N N N N E E 000 0 U U0 �� K i m � Q: U U U U U U U 15 m rn £' m rn m m m m m rn m rn m m a` mp� m m _m _rn < m' D o n N M If) N < N O' . In m m m m m m m mts3 m m m m m m m m m m m m rn m rn m m m rn m m m m m m m m rn rn m m m m m w m n N r n m N m N � m m m 0 15 W Z ai ai ti ti ti oa d _3 > ,;<, <,;oa'a'a'a'g d 0 d .=> .a 0 Q L C L [D Q O 3 .� O Q W L L L L W r 1 Q C C n O Q O> W W �p C O L W W W W W C W W W W C W n W W W C 3 W W C Q W W _ 3 E E W o m x x 0 10 e W �^ E E E E W o m ,e E W W ^� m W o 0 0 W E W Z IL/i N >` L L N E W W W W E_ m m m 0 W 0 E E E w__ m W E W _� a W Y L W C C J J .0 ry O L L L L 0 O J J Y L Y E W W W W W W W d Y Y O Y Q Y O Y m Y Y Y m m N m Y Q 3 Y y Y Y = E Y Y Y Y Y i ITA r r m W W W W W N W W W W NJ C W W °o o cmmmavai;000��a= >> 3 Q Q c c c L W W W o L n n o o W 0 _ E E WW aW 0 u W C W C n n n n O Q Q W 0� j; N N N wo E N y N N N N N E E 000 0 �� 2 � 0 00 0 a m rn £' m rn m m m m m rn m rn m m m mp� m m _m _rn < m' D o n N M If) N < N O' O m n m m n m r °p W n n m m m mm � 0 15 W Z ai ai ti ti ti oa d _3 > ,;<, <,;oa'a'a'a'g d 0 d .=> .a 0 Q L C L [D Q O 3 .� O Q W L L L L W r 1 Q C C n O Q O> W W �p C O L W W W W W C W W W W C W n W W W C 3 W W C Q W W _ 3 E E W o m x x 0 10 e W �^ E E E E W o m ,e E W W ^� m W o 0 0 W E W Z IL/i N >` L L N E W W W W E_ m m m 0 W 0 E E E w__ m W E W _� a W Y L W C C J J .0 ry O L L L L 0 O J J Y L Y E W W W W W W W d Y Y O Y Q Y O Y m Y Y Y m m N m Y Q 3 Y y Y Y = E Y Y Y Y Y i ITA a i mc W c W "AZ� W d c x x W W W C mry L' W m m O a>> x wj M E E� ❑ N Y W J rL lL W W W W W W W W E W LL1 W W W W lL IL mc'f O O 1� r •- Mflttol r mO�mNm V t2 th O O OO N M M lh M IN cl r] N O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 06' w R' K K K d' Y Y R' Y Y Y Y Y Y Y K R K w Y K Y Y Y he R Of Y K n' Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N r N N r r N m N N N N N N N N N If, N N r m m CL o cmmmavai;000��a= >> 3 Q Q c c c L W W W W C L n n o o W 0 _ O JC W W W C W C n n n n O Q Q W W j; 3 Y Y C C C y Vel O ¢¢ 2 Q¢¢¢¢mmmmmmmmm'S.'2 a i mc W c W "AZ� W d c x x W W W C mry L' W m m O a>> x wj M E E� ❑ N Y W J rL lL W W W W W W W W E W LL1 W W W W lL IL mc'f O O 1� r •- Mflttol r mO�mNm V t2 th O O OO N M M lh M IN cl r] N O0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 00 06' w R' K K K d' Y Y R' Y Y Y Y Y Y Y K R K w Y K Y Y Y he R Of Y K n' Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N r N N r r N m N N N N N N N N N If, N N C ¢ ¢ WWC JNri 'lte0 LW oW W c WyyO dLW ZJ W Lo EW E W W TW QC uC a= O O O O C N O O W O a Y 3 2 2 Y Y Y Y y Y Y Y Y 3 3 S Y Y O _ Y 7 7 W t0 N N W l0 W W W W N W W W W W W W W W C W W W W W N W W W m w -6 "c .coE W W W 1maaaodaw wd o o o m W c c c cCl o'Wo E E E go a ycE Ea4 E o o pc ac vcN vcN o0d EoE N mN N i Vo % NN O o NNCN=NNdN K K K K a p p U NK K a p a c a` y m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m rn rn rn m Q' m m m w m fO m m rn m m rn m rn > j m O m L N m- m O m m O N O m a C W N W d L L a rn m O1 m W E rn °' w C W m m m °mom' A N N Q N N l0 N IU r N N N Q� 10 r W� W0 OOz !e 3 W � N� m t� W W W W m C C m W m m r m m n n n r r n n r n W n n 1� n n n W m I� O�i O�i m O1 m m m m m m m m m m m C ¢ ¢ WWC JNri 'lte0 LW oW W c WyyO dLW ZJ W Lo EW E W W TW QC uC a= O O O O C N O O W O a Y 3 2 2 Y Y Y Y y Y Y Y Y 3 3 S Y Y O _ Y 7 7 m i a a y > j W O L L L L L L L a C W W W d L L Y Y N Y W W C W E C C C C W W W W W l0 l0 N IU l0 N N N N 10 W� 3 3 3 W CI N� C W W W W W E C C W W S W W W W S W W W W W O W W = ja W W W S S W p C C C C C o S S S S Y N N n O O N h N 0 O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O O O N O N N N N N th [n M N N M c] N N CJ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O) 0 N N W N I m m m N q p C C C C CNONN 00 C 0 C O C C O p v a v E E E a 4Cm E E E m O L m a o0_ aNm mva mN 0 0 0 00 0 0 N 0 c E 0:wOf O L)o O O wOf r �M o 0N, Ix� 0 �4¢W a c a` m m m rn m rn m rn m rn m m m m m rn m rn m rn m m rn m m m m m m m m m rn m m m m m Q' m Q' m Qi m °' m rn m p' m °> m m m m m m m m �_ m m m m M M l7 N N fO f0 N '' O Q' N rn 0 _m N m m m .n- m w m m a0 m m m r N C a N�� m r r n n n rn n n n r rn n n n n r aD m m � O° °o rn rn m r 01010101010101010101010101o101010101o1010101Olo to to to to to to l010101-10I Z Z Z Z Y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z)} Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z y �. Z Z Z I N ti a m E `w c o m a a a s m m c m x U N N J O O Y J m N U 0 4> Y o x 2 d Y Y Y W m a D o a g¢ m m x ma Y O c m m c m O m L N O. (a J (a L L la O 10 la YJ a YY x m L= Ym Y J Y a d O L LQS aJ J m O a m o mYa 0 Y Y Y Ro m o _ d=>>J a. T = FuJE 'JE mm mJm 2n � .E N¢axO O O E E C C C m_ J E m m m ._ 2 xm LLo O m m mp p O O O CCpO oO O b v rn M � N N �+l th m M OI m n n' V i0 m M N p m th m T �O t7 0 m N O O r m O> W O m m m m VO) N N N N N 0 0 0 l0 M NI O O O M O O O O CI N M 10 N N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N r r gKvm oa`m� vmaci aacmiEEm! Ud Um aEU`� r y E Wm N c c c c c c cc 9E cNm lN N m m m 1m=cN0 `ro 10 ovE E E EEE a K KaoU ENKw N N N N N j mK mUX K aK K a0K K mK d 0 L) m m m m m ao m m w m m m m m m m w m m _m rn rn rn rn m rn rn m _rn rn m m m m m N m m N in n n rn m m r n n n n n n n rn m n m m� m m m m w n Z j Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z IZ ai Q 0 0 c m a Z Z Z 010101010101010 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ Z Z Z o >0 m m v 1 0 0 N N W N D- mO N m lO m C> m N O m_� N C> m� a >> N O O 0 0> m �e >> 'm o s s o L N Q Y J 3c S m m Q U1 Z < r m o s EC O (p O- ] 3 s N J N N N 10 O N O N l0 N N y> L C N Y d N O Z O C 4J l0 i m m Z o o m 2 m 0 cm E E? 'en d c c c N 0 5 m- o '� m 7 0� m m o m 0 c o Y J Y- m>> 7 S Y m m Y m' m' �^ 5 m J o m 0 E J E m E a m a Y S Y Y Y Y Z w Y 3 3 a. Y p p � m m N N o I N N N NO C C O O 10 a UI N 0 0 0 C C C l0 m a a .� .� 'A 'm .� .� .� � K - J d 08 m J O 7 m m O. 6 6 m m m m m l0 m m m m l0 N m a a- 10 a>>> J 0 N a L L O O O m m N c C 0 0 0 m m m Y m m m m m m m m m m m m m>>> J J Y m m_ m O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m>]>>>>> >> d j m x= x �J 41 C 2 2 S= S S 2 S 2 S S S = x 2 2 x 2 2 S S== S 2 = 2 N N W N 10 N N l0 10 Op C C C C C C C C C O O -i N N N N N Yl IN N V N VI N N D: it C C a w w m rn m COO m rn m m p t0��0 m M N m rn �p 52 m N N M r w N n O N � m 6WNN m� gKvm oa`m� vmaci aacmiEEm! Ud Um aEU`� r y E Wm N c c c c c c cc 9E cNm lN N m m m 1m=cN0 `ro 10 ovE E E EEE a K KaoU ENKw N N N N N j mK mUX K aK K a0K K mK d 0 L) m m m m m ao m m w m m m m m m m w m m _m rn rn rn rn m rn rn m _rn rn m m m m m N m m N in n n rn m m r n n n n n n n rn m n m m� m m m m w n Z j Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z IZ ai Q 0 0 c m a Z Z Z 010101010101010 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ IZ Z Z Z o >0 m m v 1 0 0 N N W N D- mO N m lO m C> m N O m_� N C> m� a >> N O O 0 0> m �e >> 'm o s s o L N Q Y J 3c S m m Q U1 Z < r m o s EC O (p O- ] 3 s N J N N N 10 O N O N l0 N N y> L C N Y d N O Z O C 4J l0 i m m Z o o m 2 m 0 cm E E? 'en d c c c N 0 5 m- o '� m 7 0� m m o m 0 c o Y J Y- m>> 7 S Y m m Y m' m' �^ 5 m J o m 0 E J E m E a m a Y S Y Y Y Y Z w Y 3 3 a. Y p p � m m N N o I N N N NO C C O O 10 a UI N 0 0 0 C C C l0 m a a .� .� 'A 'm .� .� .� � K - J d 08 m J O 7 m m O. 6 6 m m m m m l0 m m m m l0 N m a a- 10 a>>> J 0 N a L L O O O m m N c C 0 0 0 m m m Y m m m m m m m m m m m m m>>> J J Y m m_ m O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m>]>>>>> >> d j m x= x �J 41 C 2 2 S= S S 2 S 2 S S S = x 2 2 x 2 2 S S== S 2 = 2 HW----Hl-r2 m p t0��0 m M N m O �p �p m N N m r w N n O N � m 6WNN 0 0N N N N 1p N N N N n r r N N N N N N N N r r N N N N N 10 l0 m m tD N O N l0 l0 N 10 N W W J l0 l0 N A l0 l0 N 10 l0 O m N l0 t0 (C l0 N W 10 l0 l0 l0 l0 ja C rnccccc oc o E m Em m '� m E m d m g o v o c c cccc oc�� — c E c `o m m m m m ❑so m 4 E E 3 E a`� aci E OY a`� aci L 8 L a`ui E m m m m m m o m m m m m m m m _O u 0 8 Y B Y P a 3 v u ,v_ u u Y c a Y ,v_ a L u ,v_ E E E E E M m mm 0 d c v ami v o m v v ami (o N y to h E ami m m v v m N C E E E E E E a K K K w m K V U K V¢ 0 0 V Y a D; D: M YmmJ K YJmm U YO00E M a C K K 4! a ami U U U U U c YO W E c mCm— cm _ _ (7 a S t r c m Y Y a` m rn m� m m rn rn�� m °� Qi m rn rn rn rn m rn m rn rn m m m rn m m m� m rn rn 1`O t0 C Q�Q�� _m Q' Y rn m °' h m aD fD C V N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O m 0 m O O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z y Z Z} Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M 0 3 x K a m Y C J J C C m 3 U O m O m m J Y= 3 c E m c m c Y J s Y c _? m o_ y; J J J?? Y m m J m E Y m N WO '� 7 J Y J J L L m J Y m m O Y L J J J J d m A m Y Y Y Y a. m c y o O Z d K Y Y O Y 3 3 Y Y Y Y Y O Y m c m o Y 0 � o a .np O N CJ r t0 l0 V OJ N r W O N 01 r OJ r (O O OI O t0 O) N N ((pp n p '- N p' th (p 10 (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 D' Y Y y 0 0 0 0 0 0 y Y y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K K K K d' K K K D' Y Y Y Y Y of Y O N O � O ❑so ❑x ❑x KmC OLm DY OY 's NE Q _O J J 0 m N M -C3 mm -+is 1a Omc a Y Y C C C Y Y—n E E EC m m m m 0 m 0 0 Y Y o? M YmmJ YmmJ YJmm YO00E M 0 o 0 a _ =m mmmnJm c YO W E c mCm— cm _ _ YC m s t r c m Y Y Y 0 � o a .np O N CJ r t0 l0 V OJ N r W O N 01 r OJ r (O O OI O t0 O) N N ((pp n p '- N p' th (p 10 (O 0 0 0 0 0 0 D' Y Y y 0 0 0 0 0 0 y Y y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 K K K K d' K K K D' Y Y Y Y Y of Y 010101010101010101m1010101w Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z r Z Z Z} m m -m E m _.. n m m m m w m rnccc arcs E E r Q Q Q Q Q m O `m � d m m � HE y aEi Y v� 0 q q i 0) E K EE E E(� Ev w m w w aLi Y xt _Ntu K EE m m m m ,UU E m m m m m 0 m m U U 0 m m Y Y E Y Y m Y m N W 0 N c n r r n Y m m m m m m m a` Y m m m mm a E E E E E rn rn�� m m m m m rn m rn rn rn� w m� m m m^ m m m m r r r co m n n r r Z Z ZZZ Z Z Z �V NO N �V Z Z 010101010101010101m1010101w Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z r Z Z Z} _ > m C - NN¢ O J L L a� = o o m O c m= E t m m Z Y m m c N s 2 10 3 m m E m Y Y Y 0. Z R a 2 2 E n E m m m Q Q Q Q Q O � � a y E Y c 0 m a _ > m C - NN¢ O J L L a� = o o m O c m= E t m m Z Y m m c N s 2 10 3 m m E m Y Y Y 0. Z R a 2 2 N N N O O O M O O O N N O O O 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N m m N N N O N N N N N E m m m Q Q Q Q Q 2 . a y E c c 0 m E N 0) cE K 1 E Ev w m w w aLi Y Ym _Ntu K EE m m m m uu E m m m m m 0 m m m c m m Y Y E Y Y m Y m N W 0 N n r r n Y m m m m m m m m Y m m m mm a E E E E E rn rn�� m m rn rn m Y Y Y Y Y N N N O O O M O O O N N O O O 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N m m N N N O N N N N N Z Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z T) 010101010101>0 > I> U- 0 o 0 6 8 Y mE E E E Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m o � � N O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N E m m m m . E dm m E N 0) cE K 1 E Ev vmm u u L _Ntu K EE m m uu NE i rn rn 0 0^owo� m m c m m m m U U U n r r n m^ m m m m m m m m m m m m mm a Qi m m m rn rn�� m m rn rn m c m m m^ O0 m m r r r co n n r r Z Z ZZZ Z Z Z Z Z 0 o L U m ry j = a m o L rn 0 0 � m a m 0 L N a 0 0 m d ai m _ a E T QCC 1�-r Ci m E c m �� E m 'L m c° ami 1O 2 c c. Y n n. m a w y E t a m c m o — Y LL Y E m o o Y 0 T L o= N O a L '0 0 a 0 L m m m rn o m o E E r �Q N O O � (� 1 r K K ¢ ¢ ¢ L L t L L Y m m N N VI m m m R E E E V w c c o E E E o c o c m m m m m m Y c== S m m m n Y Y Y Y Y E E E mm Y 0 0 0 E E Y Y Y Y Y m Y m Y m Y it I I Im i N m r 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c K w w d' w Y Y w Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Z Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z T) 010101010101>0 > I> U- 0 o 0 6 8 Y mE E E E Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m o � � N O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N E m m m m EzrLV0:Q dm m E N N 0) K U a V Z K K K K d rn rn rn rn m m m m m m m m n r r n m^ n n f0 m m m Z Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z T) 010101010101>0 > I> U- 0 o 0 6 8 Y mE E E E Y Y Y Y Y Y Y m o � � N O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N } Z Z Z Z Z T Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z I Z Z Y I Z Z Z Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z Z 1 2 I Z Z Y A AZ a. J N Wd 0 >QK o 6 Q O A .0J E E n m m s o E E cJ c L L o W n W m U i0 m 3 0 E— J J J J 9 A J J o A A E c m a c A n o J J nY J f Z Z a s 0_ a F D 3 Y Y Y O 0_ Y a O Y Y Y N 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑- ❑ W W A A A A A A m W m m A A m m m m A A a C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 2-1 C�J A Y Y Y Y Y W W a A L m m m m A A m m A m m m A A m m m m l0 IV j m m m m W A m__ m p m W Ai AS $m E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E c; 3 W 1p W W W m m W W W l0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Y Y Y Y y m Y Y Y Y Y ami W Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y MMlIMMIMMmmN N � i n Ow, MR Too-wl-- OC'1 0 K n N N W W 2 Ap 2w LN W AR W_ E cW ce o cd cv caWm cm cw cd cmcmcmW _ E E n L o a E v o : EEEW Ev oy y mu mu ami v v ami o m h a0 mo ov y EWpcc 2 irwUx xWwd ¢ WO v v 00 m cp a` m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m �o m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m � m n n� rn rn m m M m m rn rn m m m Q+ °' °' o n m m rn m m m rn m m m Qi rn °' m m rn o' m ro so N m m m m m m •- m m �� m °' E' m m mC eo rn m rn m rn rn m rn m m C' m � m n n n� } Z Z Z Z Z T Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z I Z Z Y I Z Z Z Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z Z 1 2 I Z Z Y A AZ a. J N Wd 0 >QK o 6 Q O A .0J E E n m m s o E E cJ c L L o W n W m U i0 m 3 0 E— J J J J 9 A J J o A A E c m a c A n o J J nY J f Z Z a s 0_ a F D 3 Y Y Y O 0_ Y a O Y Y Y N 3 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑- ❑ W W A A A A A A m W m m A A m m m m A A a C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C 2-1 C�J A Y Y Y Y Y W W a A L m m m m A A m m A m m m A A m m m m l0 IV j m m m m W A m__ m p m W Ai AS $m E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E c; 3 W 1p W W W m m W W W l0 m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m Y Y Y Y y m Y Y Y Y Y ami W Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y MMlIMMIMMmmN N � i n Ow, MR Too-wl-- OC'1 0 K n N ololololololololo to to to to to to lolololylolololololololololololololololololololoto Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 y 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z o a. m c m c c C m m� a ro o Q c x S t L N 3 Y E C y d m O O N L O m m Y C yy m@ C N m L m m L J m O O J L m C m N 6 m J a1 m C J m C C O la J N Y C g O N L Y 'C N O E J J m 0 x a E o J m E J c m L o J E Y Y N .� 3 Y J a 3 J J a a 3 Z a n 3 Y 2 3 Y Q m W Y Y Y J J � 3 I I I I I i =o ti -6 m m m mmi mmim>m mmim> mi mi mi mi0 0 o Y d a Q Q Q QQQ Q Q m m m m mm a oOOOC m m o m m m m m 0 m E m m o Y Y Y Y S 2 L d Y Y Y Y Y Y Y J J J J J J J J Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N 10 L L Y Y i0 f0 r 0 �0 O N r0 �O T q OI N N N N N N V N M t+J aNp < (m0 a N m M OI m 10 r p m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y Y aJ N N r N N N m N N N N N N N N N N r M r7 N n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N to E E E £ cWpocN cW °° 2 2E o g p v y ayy a L Lm E E E E Ega vN_ .v - E Emomm m m m,om 0 00mm an E E E E yL ,mNN a a K V¢UUU¢ O K K K K K K KmA K K K K K 0 U U UUm U m c a a` m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m °' m rn m °i m m rn m m m rn m rn m �i rn m rn m m m m rn Qi rn m rn m Qi a m m rn Qi rn m Qi 1z: N `" <� ^ m r o m m m m o 'a ZZ- - - - - m vz m m m rn r n m n m m m n °D n iz n a3 n iz n n n n n ololololololololo to to to to to to lolololylolololololololololololololololololololoto Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 0 0 y 0 Z Z Z Z Z Z o a. m c m c c C m m� a ro o Q c x S t L N 3 Y E C y d m O O N L O m m Y C yy m@ C N m L m m L J m O O J L m C m N 6 m J a1 m C J m C C O la J N Y C g O N L Y 'C N O E J J m 0 x a E o J m E J c m L o J E Y Y N .� 3 Y J a 3 J J a a 3 Z a n 3 Y 2 3 Y Q m W Y Y Y J J � 3 I I I I I i =o ti -6 m m m mmi mmim>m mmim> mi mi mi mi0 0 o Y d a Q Q Q QQQ Q Q m m m m mm a oOOOC m m o m m m m m 0 m E m m o Y Y Y Y S 2 L d Y Y Y Y Y Y Y J J J J J J J J Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N 10 L L Y Y i0 f0 r 0 �0 O N r0 �O T q OI N N N N N N V N M t+J aNp < (m0 a N m M OI m 10 r p m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y Y aJ N N r N N N m N N N N N N N N N N r M r7 N n N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z y 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Zlol Z Z Wq J 33q O Y 3 qOL Nq OE - C Og q O J O 3 3q 3q Ya> JoJ d 0ogL cU UW .a 0 Co 0 q>q> y E a3 o a a Q W Wq J Y .I i I;AIYrII 0. Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q q K K 2 d o 0 O. d ci aj !9 m q C W W W W W N N N N N UI N W W q W c c g q q q q q q q q Y L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N J J J O O '� LO LO _ 0 0 0 o E E `m `m `m `m m m m m m Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y o 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N m r M M N mMM O O m oN O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N m N m m fD N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M r r r r N N C Ip C C g q 10 C q C C ca 'Fo NC q C W q q q W q q WWO 6EEy er- E E c c y y EyEE Z c c c c c c `o oo t r E E E E E E E E E a ,i E 4 4 8 E E E E d E E E p E E E W W E i i E E E> E o q i' W o E U E i E x i E E g i E g s d 0 C7 0 U 0 (7 0 U' o U o U o U o U' o U W K W K o 0 W W W K o U 0 U 0 0 0 U N N 0 U' 0 U 0 U W x 0 (9 0 U o O W W g W W W W W W q m q a` m Q °D m m m m m m m m rn m m m m rn m rn m m m m m m m m m m m m m m wm m m m m m m rn m rn mZZ r m o' °D `r n n m n m m m rn m n^ n n n n n n Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z y 2 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Zlol Z Z Wq J 33q O Y 3 qOL Nq OE - C Og q O J O 3 3q 3q Ya> JoJ d 0ogL cU UW .a 0 Co 0 q>q> y E a3 o a a Q W Wq J Y .I i I;AIYrII 0. Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q q K K 2 d o 0 O. d ci aj !9 m q C W W W W W N N N N N UI N W W q W c c g q q q q q q q q Y L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y W W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N J J J O O '� LO LO _ 0 0 0 o E E `m `m `m `m m m m m m Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y o 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y N N m r M M N mMM O O m oN O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N N N m N m m fD N m N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M M M r r r r N N a 3! �'IIIU III Iit�I'I E 0 0 0 > 'Ea. Q W L d c c 3 W J W a N N m 0 'm a 0 J s m 0 `c c W c c 0 c W r 0 3 y E ._ o L W 'E m 10 c W a o. ._ W O J W J J Y o W m o W W o g J E c x s 0 W C W Y W W W C C W O W J C J E C O L O o a J J 0 W 'C_ L O Z J W J W W C W W a= Y J J Y o J S y J J a y .WJ O W 3 a s J W Y d y y Z 0 D. a E Q Q Y W J 0 0 0 0 W W W D p o 0 0 0 uuv po J Y acW EO OO O EEEEooEcmcWmWcmWcmo E oWW xEJ xEJ J 0o J m0 j 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y C Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y Y c c c c O o o O Y Y Y Y ly m Omi N N W W O m N b r r r r m o m r m o m o o m r m c� m rn N n n m p o rn o in N m v v N n m �n Mic �O V0 0 0 0 0 0 r n n l0 N 10 W l0 N t0 W W l0 l0 10 W N l0 10 'EJ l6 N N - A 10 10 W N W N (0 10 E r y E y d o 00 o g 0 0 m d d m d m d aEi y y aci d 16 —C w m w '� d o o cy aci m d c m v m o E m :4 E y a u u E E ,v_ E E E E E E E a o p o ,v_ a 4 ,v_ o E a 0= N 0 m m N N N N o O W o 0 0 0 O O O W 0 o c 0 N N N c o N N m d 0 m d 0 0 U' U' o 0 X 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 K K K 0 K K K K V V w K K K 12 K R K W m a m rn rn m rn rn m m m m rn �i m m m or m m m rn rn m Qi m m m m rn m m m m m m m m O v N O M f� th O a aD m � n�� T 0 0 0 0 0 o y m o y o 0 o m o 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o o o o o o y o 0 0 o O 0 0 o I>-. ZZZZZZy} Z} Z Z Z r Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z} Z Z Z Z Z>- y Z 3! �'IIIU III Iit�I'I E 0 0 0 > 'Ea. Q W L d c c 3 W J W a N N m 0 'm a 0 J s m 0 `c c W c c 0 c W r 0 3 y E ._ o L W 'E m 10 c W a o. ._ W O J W J J Y o W m o W W o g J E c x s 0 W C W Y W W W C C W O W J C J E C O L O o a J J 0 W 'C_ L O Z J W J W W C W W a= Y J J Y o J S y J J a y .WJ O W 3 a s J W Y d y y Z 0 D. a E Q Q Y W J 0 0 0 0 W W W D p o 0 0 0 uuv po J Y acW EO OO O EEEEooEcmcWmWcmWcmo E oWW xEJ xEJ J 0o J m0 j 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y C Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y y Y c c c c O o o O Y Y Y Y ly m Omi N N W W O m N b r r r r m o m r m o m o o m r m c� m rn N n n m p o rn o in N m v v N n m �n Mic �O V0 0 0 0 0 0 r n n Z z1z1z1z1z1z1zlilzlzlzlzlzlzlz1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1zlzlzlzlilzlzlzo�z�z O > a ' -_ �¢ N d _o y C d d J O Y d S 'A C d O C d J d n d 7 C L O C d 6— L {p L t y 0 J E O>> C C d a L d C �p J d> d J J O E C Y J �p O d L J= d p d d d O 0 o Y d c a d c J d O r= Y 3 0 0 J i a J J O a a 3 a J a cri a. a Y E U a a n o■■■■e a d d a- a s C C C C L LJOdJ mJ Jm NJd NJd a'Jdgyp dECN dEC10 >dd LJdd>d J w 9 0 p J'y'y'd pY YY Y Y J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J m m N N ,p N m a r m !� 0�0 amD r h N N N mm0 tn0 N O (NO O T 2 N N N N N O O O th O N N N N N th O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n r r r m N N N N N m m m m m r N n O m 41-il < N N N N N N N N N N m m m N W N N IY N W N N IO N A l0 N W W N N N W N N N l0 !0 l0 A A N d N W !m d m C d C d C d C W C d C d C d C d C d C d C d C d C d .2-2.2" C d C d C d C d O O C d C d L C d C d C d E d C d O O O O C d d C d C d C d L W C O O d C d C y d V d O ,v_ Q g I p a a a o ,y ,v_ p ,v_ g � a a d Q o E a � � g E a a o d v L, E o E E v u d v m v v u v ,v_ ,v- v ,v_ v N d d= ,v_ d u m p �i m N m o v m= y ,v_ u �i ami It of S� of X S ami It a"i S ami m w w adi � ami 0: m w D: S a' K O: 0 0: S () S adi S adi S o U S cr c o :.: a a` m m m m m rn m rn m- °' m m m m m- rn °i m O1 m rn m m m m m m m m m m m °1 m m m rn m m c7 m m m- m rn m m m- rn m m m M��w m rn m m m rn m m n m m m^' m m m m m m m m m rn m Qi m m m rn 12: (� (� �� a\ aD a0 N H N�� N T � CI 1� � m � C C N N O O N m m m m rn m� r r r= � � m m rn rn m m � rn n n p' m r � n n Z z1z1z1z1z1z1zlilzlzlzlzlzlzlz1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1z1zlzlzlzlilzlzlzo�z�z O > a ' -_ �¢ N d _o y C d d J O Y d S 'A C d O C d J d n d 7 C L O C d 6— L {p L t y 0 J E O>> C C d a L d C �p J d> d J J O E C Y J �p O d L J= d p d d d O 0 o Y d c a d c J d O r= Y 3 0 0 J i a J J O a a 3 a J a cri a. a Y E U a a n o■■■■e a d d a- a s C C C C L LJOdJ mJ Jm NJd NJd a'Jdgyp dECN dEC10 >dd LJdd>d J w 9 0 p J'y'y'd pY YY Y Y J J J J J J J J J J J J J J J m m N N ,p N m a r m !� 0�0 amD r h N N N mm0 tn0 N O (NO O T 2 N N N N N O O O th O N N N N N th O N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n r r r m N N N N N m m m m m r N n O m 41-il < N N N N N N N N N N m m m N L U ` Q ` J O O 0 Q O m m m m o N O c y m am m M m mKO ccm m a C a. U0' c0 o o m 0 5m 0ma o m m m m o W d Q. O C _Q L E O ZZE E Y o om o o z a m 0 o 0 O m Om Y m Y Z c 0 a o E ¢] Y d 00 Z O � m m N m m m m c c n n m o cn rn O o 0 0 0 O rn N IL IL ll ii LL LL m A O _ 01 LL c a= S S S S S S S= S o m o o m m m m '- C a a d d a m J d W. m C m L m m m m m m m m m m a m O; C C a Y Y m C J m J J ._ Y J .- L O a J m m ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E m O O J m m L (a �_ G O L m m J O m m L m 0 m J L L L L L L L L L L E m C C C C C C L L L E m m J m Y m y J m m m m m m m m (a N N m m m m �a J J Y Y O Y C C m m m Y 3 O m E m m m m m m m m m m m m m g m m o 0 o Q Z Y m Z m 2 E E E E E E E E E E c m m z cc m m m m m m m m m m m z z z z A O r N m m N V O) N N M m rn m m in m �n d� �o ai ui r r r r O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 m y 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 K Y K K Y Y Y Y Y Y K LL' Y Y Y Y Y K Y K K Y K Q R Yw Y LL' Y Y Y Y LL' LL' LL' Y K K R' R' m m m m m c m m w mm mm mcm mcm Eom o cm onmm mo E mmmm m m o o E - apg am�m 0 0 N E N N ? E In' E E E E E E E tp E E o 00 0 0 U 0 U 0 U 0 U m U o U w K w W WUW 0 UmEEm 0 m^ a u` O O m O O m m m N O m m 0 O m 0 0 0 o m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lzo lzo Z} Z Z} Y >} Z j}) Z} Z Z Z Z y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z} Z Z Z 2 Z z Z 2 Z Z L U ` Q ` J O O 0 Q O m m m m o N O c y m am m M m mKO ccm m a C a. U0' c0 o o m 0 5m 0ma o m m m m o W d Q. O C _Q L E O ZZE E Y o om o o z a m 0 o 0 O m Om Y m Y Z c 0 a o E ¢] Y d 00 Z O � m m N m m m m c c n n m o cn rn O o 0 0 0 O rn N IL IL ll ii LL LL m A O _ 01 LL c a= S S S S S S S= S o m o o m m m m '- C a a d d a m J d W. m C m L m m m m m m m m m m a m O; C C a Y Y m C J m J J ._ Y J .- L O a J m m ( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E m O O J m m L (a �_ G O L m m J O m m L m 0 m J L L L L L L L L L L E m C C C C C C L L L E m m J m Y m y J m m m m m m m m (a N N m m m m �a J J Y Y O Y C C m m m Y 3 O m E m m m m m m m m m m m m m g m m o 0 o Q Z Y m Z m 2 E E E E E E E E E E c m m z cc m m m m m m m m m m m z z z z A O r N m m N V O) N N M m rn m m in m �n d� �o ai ui r r r r O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 m y 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 K Y K K Y Y Y Y Y Y K LL' Y Y Y Y Y K Y K K Y K Q R Yw Y LL' Y Y Y Y LL' LL' LL' Y K K R' R' m m 2 m m m !o m m m m W c c .�ccc Ec c o oc c E o a a o 4 4 a E a p r t v 4 E L d ami C u v ami 0 d m Lo co y d 0 VVl c m 4 m m m f .2 a 4$ g o E E E E E E N y y N N N C 0 N 0 N 0 0 0 0 O U U 0000 ei m °D rn m rn °D rn m rn m rn m aD m m m n ao m 0' m O1 m m w m' n n o' -O� OD m m m° m m O m� N� m r n m � m � � 0101010101o1o101010101010101010I01o1o10101010101010101010101010 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z y Z Z Z}} Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z y N m m Ti m m m N O y O o d N � � N N N Y V L a -O� OD m m m° m m O m� N� m r n m � m � � 0101010101o1o101010101010101010I01o1o10101010101010101010101010 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z y Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z y Z Z Z}} Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z y N N U a C W m 2 n n o ai d 'c o 'c o w o E E L >, m m 'c c 'c ¢ m d o m �. c o m R m o W m m U o m 3_ m y a�� m �_ m ._ m _ m m 3 0 m 'm m m y ,_ m e �° m L U U m L 3 0 m> o m Z Z {0 t c m m c>> m 'u O L Y m 3 0 E C C T l0 UI m Y Q i m O 3 L L m C C m C m o x o o>>> m o m '^ o o c a m- 3 0 E m o >> o m c 0 o m>> x m o 3 E a° n o 0 o m>> o >> > Y L m a O L m a Y = E K N N L. o c` N Y m O m d a L Y j x Y d a a C L a � Z a 3 W 3 c 0 co m N Y a p� � a a a in 3 a 3 3 3 a ate° m n CV r m N O m m Z O 0 0 O O O ' N Z N Z m m (O (O Lm pm L L L L m O0m O0m O0m O0m O0m O0m 0 o d a m LLL L L L C C m m ] mmj m m m m m m 0 C 000 L mC 0 L m O0 c c S >. > a> a dcmC CL E E E E E E E m m cc O O pp paa aa a a a Z p aa 0a aa pp > O cmC a N N N N N N ^ O h m M lO A r r N N N 'Q m N N N M Yl N r 0 N O O m m M m O N N m �-N O m m O � M N M O VyyyyyyyyyyK K K Y K K K K K Y Y K Y Y Y (Ifm Y Y Y d' K K Y K K K K d' d' K d' Y Y Y Y Y K Y YM-- m m m m< N N N (O N N N N N N m r r N N O y O N N N N Y V L O d OO mm o m c � v N m J c m C m m Y N N U a C W m 2 n n o ai d 'c o 'c o w o E E L >, m m 'c c 'c ¢ m d o m �. c o m R m o W m m U o m 3_ m y a�� m �_ m ._ m _ m m 3 0 m 'm m m y ,_ m e �° m L U U m L 3 0 m> o m Z Z {0 t c m m c>> m 'u O L Y m 3 0 E C C T l0 UI m Y Q i m O 3 L L m C C m C m o x o o>>> m o m '^ o o c a m- 3 0 E m o >> o m c 0 o m>> x m o 3 E a° n o 0 o m>> o >> > Y L m a O L m a Y = E K N N L. o c` N Y m O m d a L Y j x Y d a a C L a � Z a 3 W 3 c 0 co m N Y a p� � a a a in 3 a 3 3 3 a ate° m n CV r m N O m m Z O 0 0 O O O ' N Z N Z m m (O (O Lm pm L L L L m O0m O0m O0m O0m O0m O0m 0 o d a m LLL L L L C C m m ] mmj m m m m m m 0 C 000 L mC 0 L m O0 c c S >. > a> a dcmC CL E E E E E E E m m cc O O pp paa aa a a a Z p aa 0a aa pp > O cmC a N N N N N N ^ O h m M lO A r r N N N 'Q m N N N M Yl N r 0 N O O m m M m O N N m �-N O m m O � M N M O VyyyyyyyyyyK K K Y K K K K K Y Y K Y Y Y (Ifm Y Y Y d' K K Y K K K K d' d' K d' Y Y Y Y Y K Y YM-- m m m m< N N N (O N N N N N N m r r A U d c CL Im 0 n d N a ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix B implementation Schedule Summary O O n yol N 9 m LL I�I I'INl�lnl LL 9 HY 'i4'a.�yf ro'i 13: _ fl"EE4s�'✓��'t ILT�'�t��„ __ 'a0' �a K�3� __ '}�M t`a3E��q• ��kU ��5 ��081000 ��001� ��1001800 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix C Sign -In Sheets, Summary Minutes, and Comment Letter from the April 6 and 7, 1999 Public Information Meetings n r i m �Y� D m S d ti IN S C CL M QCO ~ fr° a ° 4 Q U N o N . M F' WO O WW --F• tro —F" - O mE 0<< 2! O=va m0 F LLpw CT6 a0=CCCO) Z m m z:Dcna�s� X i —OZZ -� `oY= um- kA M UUQO (� J UF--mn MCS ZE Z5 7) WZ�Y? 4 2Q Q h N L LL p Q 3 M D c v a— m M S E > J m Z 4] N � W m J J � -p C Z_ 10 0 a Summary Meeting Minutes County of Hawaii TRANSITION PLAN RELATED TO CURB RAMPS PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Thursday, April 6, 1999 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Mayor's Office Conference Room Hanama Place 75-5705 Kuakini Highway, Suite 103 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96740 Attendance: See attached sign -in sheet. 1) The public information meeting on the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works' (DPW) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan for Curb Cuts was convened by Mr. Earl Matsukawa of Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. (WOA). WOA has been contracted by the DPW to prepare the Self Evaluation and Transition Plan, 2) Mr. Matsukawa introduced: a) Mr. Norman Olesen, Executive Assistant of the Mayor's Office, and ADA Coordinator; b) Mr. Galen Kuba, Chief, Engineering Division, DPW (unable to attend); c) Mr. Bill Hecker, Hecker Design, Ltd. (HDL); d) Staff from WOA including Mr. Pete Pascua, Ms. Ulalia Woodside and Ms. Laura Mau; 3) Mr. Matsukawa explained that the Draft Transition Plan was prepared for curb ramps under the jurisdiction of the County. It is the companion document to the Self Evaluation report, for which public meetings were held late last year. The Self Evaluation looks at the policies and practices of the County regarding the provision of accessible sidewalks. Both documents are required as part of the ADA Title Il requirements. They were prepared under a court order pursuant to a settlement agreement between the County and Plaintiffs. 4) This is the third ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan project that WOA has teamed with HDL, including the City and County of Honolulu (Transition Plan was recently adopted) and the County of the Maui. Subsequent to this series of public meetings, we will be preparing the Final Transition Plan and working toward its adoption by County Council. The deadline for adoption is July 2, 1999. 5) WOA conducted all of the surveying for the Transition Plan, and worked closely with Mr. Hecker to develop a database and computer program that could incorporate all the data that was collected. The program to allows us to sort the data, establish priorities, and identify costs. It also provides flexibility to the County in evaluating priorities in relation to other resurfacing projects. Summary Meeting Minutes Kona Public Meeting, April 6, 1999 Page 2 6) WOA conducted all of the surveying for the Transition Plan, and worked closely with Mr. Hecker to develop a database and computer program that could incorporate all the data that was collected. The program to allows us to sort the data, establish priorities, and identify costs. It also provides flexibility to the County in evaluating priorities in relation to other resurfacing projects. 7) Mr. Hecker explained requirements for ADA transition plans is tied to the concept under ADA call "program accessibility" which means that "...except as otherwise provided, no qualified individual with a disability shall, because of public entities, facilities or inaccessible to or usable by the individual with disabilities be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of services, programs, or activities of a public entity or be subjected to discrimination by any public entity. 8) Mr. Hecker explained that, for public entities, the Transition Plan must be documented in a form similar to the subject Transition Plan, if there are 50 or more employees of that public entity. The report is specifically developed to address concerns that are structural (physical barriers that limit people with disabilities from benefiting from the program). The curb ramp schedule is specifically required to address the priority for curb ramp installations. The court order for this project stipulates a six-year deadline. 9) Mr. Hecker noted that curb ramp work was to have been completed by July 26, 1995. This was because the County used a request -based program for replacement rather than a strategic transition plan which is required by ADA. 10) Mr. Merle Martin of Disability Rights Hawaii (DRH) commented that if everything is completed by 2005, it will be 10 years past the due date. Mr. Hecker concurred and explained that the court granted all four counties in Hawaii as well as the State Department of Transportation a six-year extension to complete the curb ramp modifications. The court order requires that the higher priority intersections be completed in the first few years, and the lower priority intersections be completed in the last few years. 11) Mr. Norman Olesen commented that the U.S. Justice Department also extended the implementation deadline. Mr. Hecker concurred that the Justice Department, under severe pressure from Congress, issued a preliminary notice stating that they were considering an extension for five years (to 2000) for the high priority areas, and an additional five years for lower priority areas (to 2005). This preliminary notice of rule is yet to be adopted. In Mr. Hecker's opinion, this indicates that Congress understands that there are mitigating circumstances to meeting the 1995 deadline. He Summary Meeting Minutes Kona Public Meeting, April 6, 1999 Page 3 noted that is it possible that five percent of the cities and counties in the U.S. have met the deadline. 12) Ms. Susan Golden commented that the County did not even start by 1995. 13) Mr. John Hartman noted that the request -based program for modifications was inappropriate and that a "master plan" is necessary. 14) Ms. Golden asked about the implementation schedule for the Transition Plan. Mr. Hecker responded that the court order stipulates that a period of six calendar years after the date of adoption by the County. The deadline for adoption is July 2, 1999. 15) Ms. Golden asked when the County will start expenditures on the modifications. Mr. Olesen responded that the County can start spending monies on the modifications as soon as the Transition Plan is adopted by the Council. 16) Mr. Olesen stated that the County is proposing to adopt the Transition Plan by resolution. Paralleling the resolution will be an ordinance for the $6.9 million appropriation. Once the monies are appropriated, it must be allocated. Mr. Olesen is insisting that there be an ordinance for allocation because a resolution appropriating the monies is not the "law". An ordinance is the law. One without the other is like granting a verbal approval without the tool (allocation) to proceed. 17) Mr. Hecker explained what the Transition Plan entailed. a) Orientation Phase: i) Determined approximately 1,900 intersections under the County's jurisdiction; ♦ Ms. Golden stated that as a newcomer to the state, it was difficult for her to determine the jurisdiction of roadways. Mr. Hecker replied that she would need to inquire with the County regarding this. She then asked if the State is preparing a separate report. Mr. Hecker replied that the State Department of Transportation is preparing a separate report through their consultant Mr. Bruce Clark. ii) Determined that two surveyors would be dispatched based on the 1,900 intersections. Survey teams were comprised of engineering staff from WOA who were trained from the Honolulu Curb Ramp Transition Team. Three major tools were used for the survey including a digital devise called a Smart Tool to measure slopes and angles, tape measure, and a digital camera. More than 2,500 photographs were taken to document the survey; Summary Meeting Minutes Kona Public Meeting, April 6, 1999 Page 4 iii) Determined items on the master coding and recommendations list included as Appendix E of the Transition Plan. The list includes 74 ADA -related concerns that were documented by the surveyors. The recommendations were based on the ADA accessibility guidelines versus the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (UFAS). Because the State of Hawaii has the Commission on Persons With Disabilities, who is responsible for the evaluation of improvement plans including the curb ramp modifications, it was decided that it would be more appropriate to use the ADA guidelines. The ADA guidelines were adopted by Hawaii Revised Statute 103.50. iv) Determined the level of detail necessary for each intersection. Some intersections will refer to "standard" detail for corrections while others may require a unique detail. ♦ Mr. Martin inquired who will have the final approval of curb cut plans that are submitted? Mr. Olesen replied that the Commission on Persons With Disabilities will have oversight with all curb cut plans. The Engineer of Record will be ultimately responsible for compliance. Mr. Martin then asked if any County personnel will review the plans prior to the Commission's review. Mr. Olesen replied that qualified licensed engineers will review the plans, who would develop possibly four or five standard "boilerplate" designs. Mr. Martin feels that someone from the County should be culpable for any plans sent to the Commission. As a taxpayer, he would like the reassurance that this will be done without some of the problems that occur in the County, i.e. Overpriced, poorly inspected plans, and he hopes that the public will get their money's worth. ♦ Mr. Hartman noted that the key element is in the final inspection by qualified individuals who know what to look for, how to inspect it, and sign off on it. ♦ Mr. Martin asked if the final inspection will occur before payment is made. Mr. Olesen replied "yes". ♦ Mr. Olesen noted that there is a provision for design defects where there is no time limitation on enforcement of poor design. Mr. Hecker asked if there is a similar provision for construction defects. Mr. Olesen said the time limit for enforcement is one year. After this, the County is responsible because they supposedly inspected the work. ♦ Mr. Martin was concerned that in the past, the Mayor has refused to accept the ADA responsibility claiming the lack of inspectors. Who will be the ADA inspectors for the curb cuts? Mr. Olesen responded that Mr. Martin misquoted the Mayor, saying that the Mayor has refused to inspect private projects but maintains that the County has always inspected County projects. Mr. Olesen said the DPW will continue to perform the curb ramps inspections and sign off on the projects. Mr. Martin asked if Summary Meeting Minutes Kona Public Meeting, April 6, 1999 Page 5 they've been trained. Mr. Hecker replied that he personally trained the DPW staff, and is more impressed with the County's DPW than any other agency he has talked to. In particular, with Mr. Galen Kuba who is the chief of engineering and who has committed his department to complying with the ADA requirements and the Transition Plan. Mr. Hecker is very confident that the work coming out of the DPW will be top quality. Mr. Hartman noted that the DPW would not lose Mr. Kuba when the administration changes -- he is staff and not an appointee. v) Determined that the best way to present the plan for the implementation phase of the project would be a computer database. This would be the most flexible and user friendly way to document and keep track of the information. The database would outline the problems, schedule for completion, date of completion, cost estimate, and actual cost, etc. A Microsoft Access database was selected as it would be compatible with the County's Geographical Information System (GIS). The database information coupled with the digital photographs and survey field notes is all the information required to develop the Transition Plan. ♦ Mr. Martin asked if the photographs are in the Access database. Mr. Hecker replied that they were in Kodak digital (JPEG) files. The photos were downloaded into the computer but are not part of the Access database because of the large memory requirement to link the photos to the data. Photographs will be available on CD-ROM, and can be coordinated with the database via specific intersection numbers. ♦ Mr. Matsukawa noted that, at the request of Mr. Kuba, a system will be developed that could link the database information with the accompanying photograph. WOA and Mr. Hecker will be developing this at a later time. ♦ Ms. Golden asked if there is a requirement under ADAAG for tactile warnings. Mr. Hecker replied that there was no such requirement under the ADA, however the State, under the provisions of HRS 103-50 has standards that show tactile warnings. Engineers will need to comply with State and ADA provisions. Tactile warnings are not truncated dome warnings but rather scored concrete warnings that provide a textural and visual change. Mr. Martin asked where the warnings are located and how do they work. Mr. Hecker replied that it located at the solid body of the curb ramp -- the main running slope of a flared side curb ramp. They are made with a tool that makes ridges in the concrete. Predominantly, they are detectable by someone using a tapping cane technique. It is not as beneficial as a truncated dome. ♦ Ms. Golden asked how the database will be maintained. For instance, as intersections are modified, will the photos and information be updated? Mr. Hecker replied that there was no requirement under ADA. The date Summary Meeting Minutes Kona Public Meeting, April 6, 1999 Page 6 of the curb ramp modification will, however, be recorded. The process to address maintenance problems lies with the County's grievance procedure. vi) Coordinated Hawaii Centers for Independent Living survey. HCIL distributed approximately 1,500 questionnaires that asked persons with disabilities to consider the types of facilities that were more important to access via sidewalks, i.e. hospitals, schools, grocery stores, etc. The information was then ranked and used to establish a weighted priority system. ♦ Mr. Martin commented that as an employee of HCIL, he felt the survey was substandard. HCIL staff was not involved in the development of the survey. Only the director was involved. b) Survey Phase i) Blue intersections or crossings had no sidewalks. Green intersections or crossings had sidewalks with curb ramps that needed to be modified. Red intersections or crossings had sidewalks with no curb ramps. ii) Intersections were separated into High and Secondary priority areas (P1 and P2, respectively). iii) For the green crossings, the surveyor needed to determine: (1) Whether the curb ramp was compliant or not; and (2) If the non-compliance was severe enough to merit spending funds to replace nominally accessible but non-compliant curb ramp. (a) The ADA program access requirement allows some flexibility if program access is ensured. Identified by the surveyors as "MI" or major/minor inconvenience, many of these crossings will be corrected during street reconstruction or alteration, and not as part of the Transition Plan. (b) One of the duties under the ADA requires the County to correct any non-compliance within the limitations of dimensional tolerances based on standard construction practices, site concerns, or technical issues that would make it infeasible to comply fully with the ADA. ♦ Mr. Hartman commented that this creates problems, and no one has been able to satisfactorily explain constructional tolerance issues to him. Mr. Hecker replied that there is no definitive answer, but many differing opinions. (3) In order to assist determinations regarding green crossings, the field surveyors: (a) Made sketch of the intersection and took field notes; (b) Reviewed the barrier and solution list; (c) Prioritized crossing based on location; (d) Documented barrier severity or potential safety hazard; (e) Took photos of each element at the crossing; and (f) Addressed any site specific infeasibility concerns. Summary Meeting Minutes Kona Public Meeting, April 6, 1999 Page 7 ♦ Mr. Martin asked if there was a reason the print was so small on the Master Coding List. Mr. Hecker responded that the one page format was preferred by the field surveyors who could fold and carry the sheet in their pocket. ♦ Ms. Golden asked if the intersections identified for modification represent red corners? Mr. Hecker responded that in actuality the majority of the work addresses green corners, or correcting existing curb ramps that are severely out of compliance. iv) The majority of the intersections that did not have curb ramps, or red crossings, were in residential areas. The same survey process used for green crossings was used. ♦ Mr. Hartman asked whether the road that goes through Honokaa Town is a State road because there are no curb cuts. Mr. Olesen responded that it is indeed under State jurisdiction. ♦ Ms. Golden asked if she called State to get the list of all those under State jurisdiction. Mr. Olesen responded that Mike Medeiros is the project manager to contact. ♦ Mr. Hecker asked if the State had conducted any public meetings for the State Transition Plan. Mr. Martin responded that the State does not typically hold public meetings, but in reality they are scoping meeting where select individuals are invited without a public notice in the newspaper. b) Survey Findings i) 650 intersections that had sidewalks on one or more corners; ii) 1,935 curb ramps, curb cuts, or islands were reviewed as elements; iii) 1,041 crossings with out curb ramps, the majority of which are in residential areas; iv) 258 P1 intersections; v) 392 P2 intersections; vi) 525 elements with slopes > 5%; vii)127 elements with slopes > 12%, where there is a safety concern; ♦ Mr. Hartman asked if there was a recommendation relating to commercial uses that would require the site the facility on the property so steep slopes are not created. Mr. Hecker responded that nothing under the Federal ADA law that prohibits a facility from being constructed in a way that the facility can not be accessed from sidewalk. There is a requirement that buildings on a site must be connected. Technically there is a requirement to connect a facility to the sidewalk, however, if there is a limitation in the public right-of-way, it may be technically infeasible to connect the building to the public right-of-way. There is also another limitation called Summary Meeting Minutes Kona Public Meeting, April 6, 1999 Page 8 structurally impracticable, but it has such a high burden of proof that it is rarely used. viii) P1 and P2 are unique intersections that will be costly to modify and (1) 134 intersections in commercial areas (P1) (2) 127 intersections surveyed in residential areas (P2), many are recommendations for change because of potential safety hazards (3) over 2,500 digital photographs were taken and are now on CD-ROM. c) Concurrent with the field surveys a database was developed to define: barrier numbers by element, recommendations, "Ballpark" cost estimates, priority factors like severity and location, and intersection numbers for cross reference with field notes, database and photos. b) Implementation Analysis i) Categorized areas served by sidewalks as Priority I (P1) and Priority II (P2) to be consistent with the Justice Department Title II regulations; ♦ Ms. Golden questioned the categorization of parks as Priority II. Mr. Hecker responded that under the Justice Department regulations the ability to access grocery stores, doctors, and work are of a higher priority than access to recreation. Mr. Hecker also identified that another component is the continued response by the county to install curb ramps where a need is shown. ♦ Mr. Martin asked if the installation of ramps will be required for all new curb installations. Mr. Hecker responded "yes," unless steep slopes are an issue. ♦ Ms. Golden asked if funding for transition plan and request -based alterations come from the same source. Mr. Hecker responded that would be covered later. ii) Addressed local considerations; iii) Developed a priority system based on weighted numeric factors including: (1) Pedestrian traffic; (2) Bus routes (although not used now, it is in the database should a fixed - route system be developed); ♦ Ms. Golden stated that there is bus service. Mr. Hecker explained that the service does not have bus stops that are tied to the pedestrian circulation network. Ms. Golden stated that the bus stop at Coconut Grove is on the sidewalk. ♦ Mr. Martin asked, of towns that Mr. Hecker is familiar, what percentages do not have a fixed -route bus system. Mr. Hecker responded that for similar sized communities, approximately 65% do not have a fixed route system. Summary Meeting Minutes Kona Public Meeting, April 6, 1999 Page 9 (3) Destinations; ♦ Regarding churches as a destination, Mr. Martin commented that although churches are exempt from compliance with ADA they were included in the priority system. Mr. Hecker responded that as a result of the HCIL prioritization poll churches were included. ♦ Ms. Golden commented that while churches are exempt, the sidewalk accessing the church needs to be accessible. (4) Severity; ♦ Ms. Golden asked for clarification of "blocks" sidewalk access. Mr. Hecker responded that if a sidewalk has no curb ramp, access is blocked. Ms. Golden questioned whether that was more important than a potential safety hazard. Mr. Hecker clarified that modifying curb ramps that might cause someone to fall over is more important than the inconvenience of traveling around the block to access a curb ramp. Ms. Golden asked if persons with visual impairments were considered. Mr. Hecker responded that many people with visual impairments, especially those using either canes or services dogs, prefer curbs to curb ramps. Speaking for herself, Ms. Golden commented that there are times when she thinks there is a curb ramp and goes over the end of the sidewalk. 4/6/99 To: Wilson Okamoto & Associates From: Ron Amundson Re: Hawaii County Draft Transition Plan for Curb Ramps This memo is written because I cannot attend the hearing scheduled for April 7, 1999. I will have other comments that will depend on answers to some of the questions I raise. I also expect that information will be conveyed at the hearing which would clarify my understanding. So some of what is said below may be irrelevant. Several of my colleages from Disability Rights Hawaii will attend the hearing, so I am sure that more information will be given to me. While the Draft Transition Plan has many valuable features, it seems to me to have one very serious flaw. Unless I completely misunderstand the document, there will be no new curb cuts installed for three years, even though about 3 million dollars will be spent refurbishing the existing curb cuts. This is wrong. The use of the "severity code" only on "Green" intersections (those that already have curb cuts) distorts the priorities that should be assigned to these intersections. Intersections that have no curb cuts are a least as hazardous as intersections with imperfect curb cuts. At intersections with curb barriers, people with wheelchairs must go into the roadway in order to travel. This serious hazard is not recognized in the current priorities. A much higher priority must be given to intersections that currently have no curb cuts. At least 75% of the money during the first years of the transition should be spent to install new curb cuts, not just to spruce up the old ones. If the current priority list is followed, the last five years of disability rights advocacy and County expenses of curb cuts installation will have been wasted. Nearly all of the curb cuts installed during this period will be ripped out and replaced. This will result in almost no improvement in accessibility, with very high cost. I hope this was just a technical oversight. But I can imagine that some conscious bureaucratic decision was made that all existing curb cuts must be made perfect before any new curb cuts are installed. If such a decision was actually made, it must be changed. There is a long history of disabled people being denied access "for their own good" because of "safety" reasons. Wheelchair users used to be kept off airlines because we wouldn't be able to evacuate fast enough. This sort of paternalism is unacceptable. If a curb cut is genuinely dangerous, it should be changed. But if it is merely imperfect from an engineering point of view, it should remain until the very many curb barriers in the community have been remedied. Disabled people are able to decide whether a curb cut is safe or not, just as non -disabled people are able to decide when it is safe to cross the street. We need more curb cuts, not the perfectionist fine tuning of the ones we already have. I have other testimony to forward on specific priorities, but this general point is so important that I wish to make it clear at the start of the discussion. Thank you for your consideration. Ron Amundson University of Hawaii at Hilo Hilo, HI 96720-4091 ronald@hawaii.edu N a C U) cd G Q co U � E o C 2 .o Z aU ° m w0. O w A w rnQ uj~ 5tea o Q J y p OQ Q~ Y 0 0 2(AJ ELN Q0EM E 3m Z: E m Z Y 0}~ Q U O O coX d co o N ZE-a m OZZ UUQL 0�Q D Uh3 00 E °o Z)WZ Q CC F- 0 F a E- LL Y O Q 3 C O L CL E O N E > J m Z OJ 0 N W J J � � Z C N i W N LL W Q W J a Summary Meeting Minutes County of Hawaii TRANSITION PLAN RELATED TO CURB RAMPS PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Thursday, April 6, 1999 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. Waimea Community Center 65-1260 Kawaihae Road Waimea, HI 96743 Attendance: No attendance from public. V rk T- s' O o J 0 a � a F m 1O o o �O Lu w_Ocoo oQ oN O i LLI M 00 W 0 < oa'57o 0 0 F-Wpw 2! a O a m ohm }HZ o O� �m LL a_ m a Z —2o z a^ O ZZ W UUa2oon UI`Ur Q m LUzo i � wZ D O a a c ° S F- o N n. s o C L W q 1_1 _ � M > J W m Z y I W J Z z C N % W W W r(� vV W y' 4 CCC J d Summary Meeting Minutes County of Hawaii TRANSITION PLAN RELATED TO CURB RAMPS PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING Wednesday, April 7, 1999 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. Liquor Control Building Hilo Lagoon Center 101 Aupuni Street, Suite 230 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attendance: See attached sign -in sheet. 1) The public information meeting on the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works' (DPW) Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan for Curb Cuts was convened by Mr. Earl Matsukawa of Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. (WOA). WOA has been contracted by the DPW to prepare the Self Evaluation and Transition Plan. 2) Mr. Matsukawa introduced: a) Mr. Norman Olesen, Executive Assistant of the Mayor's Office, and ADA Coordinator; b) Mr. Galen Kuba, Chief, Engineering Division, DPW; c) Mr. Bill Hecker, Hecker Design, Ltd. (HDL); d) Staff from WOA including Mr. Pete Pascua, Ms. Ulalia Woodside and Ms. Laura Mau; 3) Ms. Betsy Palmer requested that everyone introduce themselves. In attendance were: Daniel Grant -Johnson, Nanci Paiva and Gail Yoncoka. 4) Mr. Matsukawa explained that the Draft Transition Plan was prepared for curb ramps under the jurisdiction of the County. It is the companion document to the Self Evaluation report, for which public meetings were held late last year. The Self Evaluation looks at the policies and practices of the County regarding the provision of accessible sidewalks. Both documents are required as part of the ADA Title II requirements. They were prepared under a court order pursuant to a settlement agreement between the County and Plaintiffs. 5) WOA and HDL recently completed the City and County of Honolulu ADA Self Evaluation and Transition Plan (recently adopted) which has entered the 6 -year implementation phase. Subsequent to this series of public meetings, we will be preparing the Final Transition Plan and working toward its adoption by County Council. The deadline for adoption is July 2, 1999. Summary Meeting Minutes Hilo Public Meeting, April 7, 1999 Page 2 6) Mr. Daniel Grant -Johnson asked if the City and County of Honolulu's Self Evaluation and Transition Plan was also the result of a judgement. Mr. Matsukawa replied that settlement agreements have been reached in all four counties. A similar settlement agreement has been reached for streets under State jurisdiction. In smaller towns the main road through town is the State highway. 7) Mr. Hecker explained that this transition plan fulfills the requirements of both a settlement agreement, and mandated federal ADA requirements. 8) Public entities with 50 or more employees are required to prepare transition plans to ensure the concept known as "program accessibility." Which means people with disabilities will have the opportunity to benefit from available services. The report is specifically developed to address concerns that are structural (physical barriers that limit people with disabilities from benefiting from the program). The curb ramp schedule is specifically required to address the priority for curb ramp installations. The court order for this project stipulates a six-year deadline. Implementation of this transition plan will take place between the years 2000 and 2005 beginning no later than July 2, 1999. 9) Mr. Hecker explained what the Transition Plan entailed. a) Orientation Phase: ii) Determined approximately 1,900 intersections under the County's jurisdiction; iii) Determined that two surveyors would be dispatched based on the 1,900 intersections. Survey teams were comprised of engineering staff from WOA who were trained from the Honolulu Curb Ramp Transition Team; iv) Determined that the best way to present the plan for the implementation phase of the project would be a computer database. Each intersection was assigned a number which became the key feature linking field notes, survey forms, recommendations, photographs, and the database; v) Database included the identification of barriers, recommendations, a "ballpark" cost estimate, photograph cross reference numbers, and severity and location priorities. b) Implementation Analysis i) Under the ADA Regulations Priority I (P1) represents primarily commercial areas and Priority II (P2) areas are primarily residential; ii) Local considerations used in analysis of field data included: requirements of settlement agreement; requirements of the Justice Department Title II regulations; ADAAG standards; and ongoing curb ramp installation projects; and iii) The self evaluation phase discovered that in the past the County was not installing curb ramps when alterations were made within the public right-of-way. A separate duty, in addition to the transition plan, requires correcting any problems resulting Summary Meeting Minutes Hilo Public Meeting, April 7, 1999 Page 3 from previous street alteration projects, including installing curb ramps. This requirement will be a concurrent, but separately funded. ♦ Mr. Grant -Johnson asked whether this is addressed in the Self Evaluation. Mr. Hecker stated that alteration remediation is covered in the Self Evaluation report. Strategic curb ramp modifications are covered in the Transition Plan. The Transition Plan also includes a contingency fund that will address specific requests from persons with disabilities. ♦ Ms. Palmer asked whether correcting improperly installed curb ramps would jeopardize funding for subsequent projects. Mr. Hecker responded that for the most part under capital improvement projects the County can require the contractor to make any corrections within one year. ♦ Mr. Grant -Johnson asked if accessible sidewalks were addressed in the Self Evaluation. Mr. Hecker responded that indeed the Self Evaluation addresses sidewalks and the unique situation in the County that requires abutting property owners to maintain sidewalks. Mr. Grant -Johnson asked if sidewalks would be surveyed. Mr. Hecker responded that there are no current plans to document sidewalk concerns, however the County has a duty to address individual requests. There are no strategic plan requirements under ADA relating to sidewalks. ♦ Mr. Grant -Johnson asked which road maps were used in the field survey process. Mr. Hecker responded that surveyors used County maps and available road maps. In some cases the surveyors added roads that did not appear on the maps. Mr. Pete Pascua added that the surveyors also checked the county maps against the Tax Maps. ♦ With regards to alteration projects, Ms. Yoneoka asked if the installation of traffic signals were included. Mr. Hecker responded that the Justice Department released an interpretation letter (available on the world wide web) stating that the installation of vehicular traffic signals does not constitute an alteration to the pedestrian right-of-way. Therefore, the 20% path -of -travel requirement does not apply when traffic signals are installed. Mr. Kuba added that current County practices provide a small section of sidewalk as protection for pedestrians. ♦ Mr. Hecker inquired as to the status of the County's project to install "mushroom - type" buttons at pedestrian crossing signals. Mr. Kuba replied that the project is almost complete. Ms. Paiva asked if all intersections will have the new buttons. Mr. Hecker responded that intersections that currently have pedestrian crossing signals will be installed with the new buttons. ♦ Ms. Yoneoka asked about situations that have traffic signals and crosswalks but no sidewalks. Mr. Hecker responded that those crosswalks are for the protection of the pedestrians that do not need an improved sidewalk to access the crossing. Since no improved pedestrian route exists, there is no duty under the ADA to make the crossing accessible. Summary Meeting Minutes Hilo Public Meeting, April 7, 1999 Page 4 iv) Established a weighted priority system to prioritize intersection modifications which included: (1) Pedestrian traffic or use of a particular sidewalk; (2) Bus route traffic, which was not applicable to this County; (3) Destination priority based on the findings of the HCIL survey and field surveyors' observations; (4) Severity priority that is skewed to address the concerns associated with tort liability and potential safety hazards; and (5) Location factor based on the classification of towns or metropolitan areas. v) Proposed a construction timetable and process which includes: the design and construction contract process; permitting and administrative review; Commission on Persons with Disabilities review, coordination with utility companies; the County budgeting process; and the remediation of past alteration projects. 10) Mr. Hecker discussed the report process requirements: a) Draft report is the result of a preliminary draft that was reviewed by the County and is available for public review and comment; b) Conduct public information meetings and receive comments; c) Appropriate modifications; and d) Final County approvals and Council adoption by July 2, 1999. 11) Reviewed findings and recommendations summarizing cost and design recommendations: a) Estimated cost of $6,396,500 to install or modify 317 intersections; $3,778,000 associated with P1 commercial area renovations, $1,551,500 associated with P2 or residential areas; and b) Quantity of each recommended modification design. 12) Mr. Hecker read a letter received from Ron Amunson, Secretary for Disability Rights Hawaii regarding the weighted priority system, specifically the severity priority (see attached). 13) In response to Mr. Amunson's letter Mr. I Iecker clarified that based on the various factors of the weighted priority system and a mathematical formula, the database prioritized curb ramp modifications. It was not a bureaucratic decision. Secondly, with the exception to the potential safety hazard factor, the mathematical formula is neutral regarding curb ramps. Finally, the intent of the survey process was not to make every curb ramp "perfect." Curb ramps that are non-compliant but useable were not identified for modification. 14) Mr. Grant -Johnson noted that by weighting potential safety hazards with 7 points, and all other intersections with 0 points, the severity priority factor is skewed. As a result, in the first three years every curb ramp that is identified for modification is a potential safety hazard. While liability is a concern, he disagrees that every potential safety hazard needs to Summary Meeting Minutes Hilo Public Meeting, April 7, 1999 Page 5 be fixed in the first three years. Mr. Grant -Johnson explained that he and Mr. Amunson would prefer a percentage of the money earmarked to install new curb ramps. They arbitrarily came up with 75/25, but would accept 50/50. 15) Mr. Hecker asked for clarification if the desire was to install new curb ramps regardless of the destinations or facilities served. Mr. Grant -Johnson stated their concern was that during the first three years funds were not earmarked to install new ramps. Mr. Hecker responded that modifications scheduled in the first three years are for intersections serving important destinations or facilities, regardless of curb ramps. 16) Mr. Hecker is concerned that if funds are designated arbitrarily the end result may be contrary to the Justice Department mandate. Mr. Grant -Johnson stated that developed areas have ramps that are usable, they don't want to see money spent on usable ramps. Mr. Kuba suggested reducing the weighting of potential safety hazards from a 7 to either 2 or 1. Mr. Hecker suggested that another option would be to add a category for intersections without curb ramps and reducing the weight of the safety hazards. Mr. Hecker stated that it was his decision to weight potential safety hazards. Corporation Council should be consulted regarding the level of risk they will be willing to absorb. 17) Ms. Yoneoka asked if the primary concern was for the safety of ambulatory pedestrians or the disabled. Mr. Hecker responded that the priority system is color-blind; both ambulatory and disabled pedestrian safety issues are addressed. Ms. Yoneoka asked if there was documentation of specific sites of ambulatory pedestrian safety hazards. Mr. Hecker responded that historic data shows that flared -sided curb ramps with slopes greater than 15% are a tripping hazard for the ambulatory pedestrian. Mr. Grant -Johnson asked if there are actual incidences. Mr. Hecker responded that it varies across the country, but he did not have data specific to the County. 18) Mr. Matsukawa stated that potential safety hazards may be weighted too heavily. Mr. Hecker suggested that a separate category ranking P 1 and P2 intersections with no curb ramps could be developed. Mr. Pascua commented that exclusively modifying the severity factor may not substantially increase the outcome. The addition of a second factor may increase the number of intersections without curb ramps identified. Mr. Grant -Johnson concurred and recommended adding a severity category exclusively for intersections without curb ramps. 19) Mr. Hecker stated that with the exception of the severity factor, the current weighted priority system addresses accessibility needs at intersections, regardless of curb ramps. 20) Mr. Grant -Johnson stated that without curb ramps, wheelchair users are at risk when they must travel in the road. Mr. Hecker agreed and responded that in the terms of ADA Summary Meeting Minutes Hilo Public Meeting, April 7, 1999 Page 6 compliance, the County's responsibility is strictly related to the existing circulation network of sidewalks and does not include the use of the roads. 21) Mr. Hecker stated that a modified weighting system would be developed and the results compared to the original findings. The results would be forwarded to either Mr. Grant - Johnson or Mr. Amunson if they were available prior to the next Disability Rights Hawaii meeting. 22) Mr. Grant -Johnson asked if the recording of the meeting would be available. Ms. Paiva responded that she would be able to get him a copy. Mr. Hecker commented that summary minutes of the meeting would be prepared and included in the Final Transition Plan document. ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix D Architectural Access Committee "Technical Infeasibility" Statement Form "TECHNICAL INFEASIBILITY" Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) ADAAG contains a provision relating to "technical infeasibility", applicable only in alterations. This exception does not apply to new construction. The provision is as follows: 4.1.6 Accessible Buildings: Alterations (1) General... (j) Exception: In alteration work, if compliance with 4.1.6 is technically infeasible, the alteration shalt provide accessibility to the maximum extent feasible. Any elements or features of the building or facility that are being altered and can be made accessible shall be made accessible within the scope of the alteration. pl�ll f Infeasible. Means, with respect to an alteration of a building or a facility, that it has little likelihood of being accomplished because existing structural conditions would require removing or altering a load-bt:uring member which is an essential part of the structural frame; or because other existing physical or site constraints prohibit modification or addition of eletttents, spaces, or features which are in full and strict compliance with the minimum requirements for new construction and which are necessary to provide accessibility. 'TECHNICAL INFEASIBILITY" STATEMENT Relating to a project under review for §103.50, HRS Project Dept. Project Number; CPD Project following item in the planned alteration pro ect is not in full compliance with 4.1.6 as noted review by the Commission on Persons wit Disabilities. As determined by the Departmc treeing the project and/or the project consultant, this alteration item does provide a level :ssibility to the maximum extent feasible in compliance with ADAAG 4.1.60). to CPD Document Review Dated; Item Number: of why item is 'Technically Infeasible" acknowledge that responsibility for determining "technical infeasibility" tests with the riment/Agenoy overseeing the project and/or the project consultant. Signature of Deputmont Direotor Date CPD-FAU-2 (rev. 7/99) ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix E Master Coding and Recommendations Lists Master Coding List Curb Ramp Survey Checklist 01 -Location Issues 0101 there is no curb ramp serving the comer/no path of accessible route; Blocks Access) 0102 the existing curb ramp m this comer serves only Weisman traffic in one direction; (BA) 0103 existing diagonal curb ramp has less than 48" landing out of traffic, (Major Inconvenience or Potential Safety Hazard) 0104 curb ramp projects into Me traffic lanes(s); (MI or PSH) 0105 existing curb ramp located so 4 can be blocked by parked vehicles; (BA) 0106 no spacing between raised AC curbing. 02 - Running Slope 6 Cross Slope Issues 0201 Me running slope of the curb ramp is less Man 0.3%; (No Banner) 0202 Me running slope of the curb ramp is 8.3%<x<10I6; (MI) 0203 Me running slope of the curb ramp is 10%<x<12%, (MI) 0204 Me running slope of the curb ramp is 12%<x<15%, (PSH) 0205 Me running slope of Me curb tamp is 15% or steeper; (PSH) 0208 Me cross slope of Me curb ramp is less than 2%; (No Barrier) 0207 Me cross slope o(Me curb ramp is 2%<x<4%, (MI) 0208 Me cross slope of Me curb ramp is 4%<x<8.3%, (MI) 02[18 Me cross slope of Me curb ramp is greater Man 8.3%; (PSH) 03 - Side Conditions 0301 flared sides less Man 8.3%; (No Barre0 0302 flared sides 6.3%<x<10%; (MI) 0303 flared sides 1096<x<12%. (Mp 0304 flared sides 1716,15%, (PSH) 0305 flared sues 15% or steepen; Ill 0308 return curb condition in pedestrian path, (PSH) 04 -Bottom Landing and Cross Walk Markings 0401 curb ramp not located in cross walk markings; Blocks Access or PSH) 0402 less Man 48" clear space between diagonal curb ramp and cross walk; (MI or PSH) 0403 transition lip between curb ramp and gutter <1/4" high, (MI) 0404 tnnsmon lip between curb ramp and gutter 1/4"<x<1/2' high, (MQ 0405 tension lip between curb ramp and gutter 1/2"<x<1" high, (PSH) 0406 transition lip between curb ramp and gutter is greater than 1"; (PSH) 0407 gutter slope less Man 5%; (No Barrier) 0408 gutter slope 5%<x<8.396; (MI) 0409 putter slope 83%<xg0%;(PSH) 0410 gutter slope 10%<x<12%; (PSH) 0411 gutter slope 12%<x<15%, (PSH) 0412 transition lip between street and gutter <1/4" high; (No Barrier) 0413 transition lip between street and gutter 1/4"<x<12' high; (MI) 0414 transition lip between street and gutter 1?<x<t"high, (PSH) 0415 transition lip between street and gutter is greater Man 1'; (PSH) 0416 street slope (whit 48') Was Man 5%, (No Barrier) 0417 street slope (w/in 48') 5%<x<8.3%; (MI) 0418 street slope (w/in 48') 8.3%<x<10%, (PSH) 0419 street slope (whir 48') 10%<x<12%, (PSH) 0420 street slope (w/in 48'1 12%<x<15%; (PSH) 0421 street paving has gaps, cracks or irregularities in path Mat create 1/4"+ Ievel changes, (MI, BA, or PSH) 0422 there is evidence of water ponding at Me bosom of the curb route; (MI) 0423 sharp change in ramp slope at bottom of ramp; (MI) O5 -Top Landing of Curb Ramp 0501 there is less Man 48" from Me top of ramp W wall/property line; (BA) 0502 landing is not level at sidewalk (2%<x<5%); (Mil 0503 landing is not level at sidewalk (5%<x<8.3%); (MI) 0504 landing is not level at sidewalk (x>8.396); (PSH) 0505 transition lip between curb ramp and sidewalk <l/4" high; (No Barrier) 0506 tansiticn lip between curb ramp and sidewalk 1/4"<x<12' high; (MI) 0507 mnsitron hp between curb ramp and sidewalk 12•<x<1" high (PSH) 0508 transition lip between curb ramp and sidewalk is greater Man 1"; (PSH) O6 - Width of Curb Ramp 0601 Me width of Me running slope of the ramp 29"<x<38; (MI) 0802 Me width of Me running slope of Me romp is less than 2g'; (BA) 07 - Surface Conditions of Curb Ramp 0701 Me surface of Me curb ramp has cracks (lips) or megulard es 1/4"<x,1/2high, (MI) 0702 Me surface of Me curb ramp has cracks (lips) oraregulari res higher Man 12'; (PSH) 0703 Me surface of the curb tamp ( including metal cover plates, grates, etc.) could be slipperywhen wet; (PSH) 0704 grating width slots wider than 12' in on approach route; (PSH) 0 - Wayf riding Issues for those with Visual Impairments 0801 for diagonal curb ramps, there is no 24" wide momon of curb within cross walks; (MI) 0802 object(s) on Me approach mutes project 4"4' into Me path between 2T'-80' high; (MI) 0803 object(s) on Me approach mutes project more Man 8' into path between 2T'4iO' high, (PSH) 09 - Island/Median Crossings 0901 there is no curb ramp or level cut at the islandlmedian cross walks, (BA) 0902 Me running slope of Me island cut is less than 2%, (No Barrier) 0903 Me running slope of Me island cut is 2 ,5%, (No Barrier) 0904 Me running slope of Me island cut is 5%<x<8.3%, (MI) 0905 Me running slope of Me island cut is greater than 8.3%, (PSH) 0906 Me cross slope of Me island cut is less Man 2%, (No Barrier) D907 the cross slope of Me island cut is M<x<5%, (MI) 0908 the cross slope of Me island cut is 5%<x<8 3%; (PSH) 0909 Me cross slope of Me Island cut is greater than 8.3%, (PSH) 10 - Sidewalk Approach from Bus Stop 1001 tine running slope a" Me sidewalk approach is 5%<x<8.3%, (Mg 1002 the running slope along the sidewalk approach is 5.3%<x<12%; (MI) 1003 the running slope a" the sidewalk approach is greater than 12%; (PSH) 1004 the cross slope along Me sidewalk approach is 2%<x<4%; (MI) 1005 the cross slope along Me sidewalk approach is 4%<x<8.3%; (MI) 1008 the crass slope along Me sidewalk approach is greater Man 8.3%; (PSH) Recommendation Coding Master Llai A install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer B install a pair of new flare sued curb ramps at corner C install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth D install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location E install custom engineered solution (see special geld notes (or cost) F installation of accessible curb ramp appears infeasible (see special geld notes) G postpone modification of curb ramp until schaduled street alteration project H restripe making area to eliminate space Mat blocks accessible route I obstruct pedestrian mute across side flare with bollard, planter, or street furniture J resume cross walk markings so curb ramp is within cross walk K restripe cross walk markings so there is a 4' landing at bohom of curb ramp L grind down (1:2 max. slope) Me concrete lip with a power girder M feather out (1:2 max. slope) Me transition with a non -shrink grout N grind down (1:12 maxslope) the concrete lip with a power grinder D feather out at 1'.12 max. slope Me transition with a non -shrink grout P grind down (1:20 max. slope) Me concrete lip with a power girder O feather out at 1'20 max. slope Me transition wfth a non -shrink grout R sawcut and remove existing gufler, pour new (1.20 max, slope) concrete gutter at curb ramp 5 grind down 4'x4' section of asphalt roadway and repave with feathered flush transition T stencil Me word "Caution" on Me top of Me curb at flared sides U patch asphalt irregularities as required to ensure smooth accessible route V patch concrete pawng irregularities as required to ensure smooth accessible mute W sculpt drainage flow line with grout to eliminate ponding along accessible route % it side flares are sloped 8.3% or less, then OK (if flares are 8 3% or greater, then see below) Y site conditions prohibit level top landing (technically infeasible) Z remove existing sidewalk and replace with landing (3wide x 4' min.) with 5% max. slopes AA paint slippery surface with aggregate non -slip coating AS replace Me grating with slots perpendicular to direction of travel less than 112* wide AC screen off existing element as required for cane cue AD install a new level cut (3' wide min.) al Me island/merhan crosswalk AE install a pair of return curb ramps If adjacent area isn't a pedestrian area AF remove existing M, install a new level cut (3' wide min.) at Me island/median crosswalk AG install a custom designed engineered solution for islandlmedian M (see special field miss for cost) AH installation of an accessible curb ramphsland cut appears infeasible (see special note) Al remove existing sidewalk, regrade and pave new walk IT min width) with 2% cross slope AJ install a new single flared sue curb ramp per ADAAG AK install a new single truncated flared side curb ramp per ADAAG AL install a new double truncated flared side curb ramp per ADAAG AM install a new truncated diagonal curb ramps AN install a new single curb return ramp if adjacent area isn't a pedesMan area AO remove ramp and replace with sidewalk AP no work - Steep flare but no cross flare traffic AO install a new parallel curb ramp at apex of corner AR provide AC curb opening Master Recommendations List ADA Curb Ramp Trwisition Plan Ol - Location Issues 0101 there is no curb ramp serving the corner/no path ofaccessible route; (Blocks Access) — install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — install a pair of new flared sided curb ramps at comer — install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0102 the existing curb ramp at this corner serves only pedestrian traffic in one direction; (BA) — install another flared sided curb ramp at comer. — remove existing curb ramp and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner. — install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — install a custom designed engineered solution. — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project. 0103 existing diagonal curb ramp has less than 48" landing out oftraffic, (MI or PSH) — remove existing curb ramp and provide a pair of flared side curb ramps. — install a custom designed engineered solution. — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0104 curb ramp projects into the traffic lane(s); (MI or PSH) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth. — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location. — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0105 existing curb ramp located so it can be blacked by parked vehicles; (BA) — DTS to restripe parking area to eliminate space that blocks accessible route 02 - Running Slope & Cross Slope Issues 0201 the running slope of the curb ramp is less than 8.3%; (No Barrier) — N/A 0202 the running slope of the curb ramp is 8.3%< x <IO%; (MI) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at comer — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0203 the running slope of the curb ramp is 100/o< x <12%; (MI) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at comer — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0204 the running slope of the curb ramp is 12%< x <15%; (PSH) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible 0205 the running slope of the curb ramp is 15% or steeper, (PSH) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible 0206 the cross slope of the curb ramp is less than 2%; (No Barrier) 0207 the cross slope of the curb ramp is 2%< x <4%; (MI) — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0208 the cross slope of the curb ramp is 4%< x <8.3%; (IVO) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0209 the cross slope of the curb ramp is greater than 8.3%; (PSH) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible 03 - Side Conditions 0301 flared sides less than 8.3%; (No Barrier) — N/A 0302 flared sides 8.3%< x <10%; (No Barrier or MI if <4' at top landing) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at comer — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project — obstruct pedestrian route across side flare with bollard, planter, or street furniture 0303 flared sides 10%< x <12%; (MI) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at comer — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project — obstruct pedestrian route across side flare with bollard, planter, or street furniture 0304 flared sides 120/o< x <I5%; (PSIS — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project — obstruct pedestrian route across side flare with bollard, planter, or street furniture 0305 flared sides 15% or steeper; (PSM — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at comer — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project — obstruct pedestrian route across side flare with bollard, planter, or street furniture 0306 return curb condition in pedestrian path; (PSH) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of comer — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project — obstruct pedestrian route across side flare with bollard, planter, or street furniture 04 - Bottom Landing and Cross Walk Markings 0401 curb ramp not located in cross walk markings; (Blocks Access or PSH) — restripe cross walk markings so curb ramp is within — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this locatior — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0402 less than 48" clear space between diagonal curb ramp and cross walk; (MI or PSH) — restripe cross walk markings so there is a 4' landing at bottom of curb ramp — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth 0403 transition lip between curb ramp and gutter <1/4" high; (MI) — grind down (1:2 max. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:2 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 0404 transition lip between curb ramp and gutter 1/4"< x <1/2" high; (MI) — grind down (1:12 max. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:12 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 0405 transition lip behveen curb ramp and gutter 1/2"< x <1" high; (PSH) — grind down (1.20 max. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:20 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 0406 transition lip between curb ramp and gutter is greater than 1" high; (PSM — grind down (1:20 max slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:20 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 0407 gutter slope less than 5%; (No Barrier) — N/A 0408 gutter slope 5a/a< x <8.3%; (Ivii) - postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0409 gutter slope 8.3% < x <l0%; (PSH) — sawcut and remove existing gutter, pour new (1:20 max. slope) concrete gutter at curb ramp 0410 gutter slope 10% < x <12%; (PSM — sawcut and remove existing gutter, pour new (1:20 max. slope) concrete gutter at curb ramp 0411 gutter slope 12% < x <15%; (PSH) — sawcut and remove existing gutter, pour new (1:20 max. slope) concrete gutter at curb ramp 0412 transition lip between street and gutter <1/4" high; (No Barrier) — N/A 0413 transition lip between street and gutter 1/4"< x <1/2" high; (MI) — grind down (1:2 max. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:2 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout — grind down 4' x 4' section of asphalt roadway and repave with feathered flush transition 0414 transition lip between street and gutter 1/2"< x <1" high; (PSI) — grind down (1:12 max. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:20 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout — grind down 4' x 4' section of asphalt roadway and repave with feathered flush transition 0415 transition lip between street and gutter is greater than 1" high; (PSH) — grind down (1:20 max. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:20 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout — grind down 4' x 4' section of asphalt roadway and repave with feathered flush transition 0416 street slope (w/in 48") less than 5%; (No Barrier) 0417 street slope (w/in 48") 5%< x <8.3%; (MI) — stencil the word "caution" on the top of the curb at flared sides 0418 street slope (Win 48") 8.3% < x <10%; (MI) — stencil the word "caution" on the top of the curb at flared sides 0419 street slope (w/in 48") 10% < x <12%; (PS14) — stencil the word "caution" on the top of the curb at flared sides 0420 street slope (w/in 48") 12% < x <15o/a; (PSH) — stencil the word "caution" on the top of the curb at flared sides. 0421 street paving has gaps, cracks or irregularities in path that create 1/4"+ level changes; (MI, BA, or PSH) — patch asphalt irregularities as required to ensure smooth accessible route — patch concrete paving irregularities as required to ensure smooth accessible route 0422 there is evidence of water ponding at the bottom of the curb route; (MI) — sculpt drainage flow line with grout to eliminate ponding along accessible route 05 - Top Landing of Curb Ramp 0501 there is less than 48" from top of ramp to wall/property line; (Blocks Access) — if side flares are sloped 8.3% or less, then OK (if flares are 8.3% or greater, then see below) — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0502 landing is not level at sidewalk (2°/u< x <50/4); (MI) — N/A (same criteria as bottom landing at street with 5% crown) 0503 landing is not level at sidewalk (5°/u< x <8.31/o); (MI) — site conditions prolubit level top landing ... (Technically Infeasible) postpone modification of sidewalk until scheduled street alteration project — remove existing sidewalk and replace with landing (3'w.x4'1. min.) with 5% max. slopes 0504 landing is not level at sidewalk (x >8.3%); (PSH) — site conditions prolubit level top landing ... (Technically Infeasible) postpone modification of sidewalk until scheduled street alteration project. — remove existing sidewalk and replace with landing (3'w.x4'1, min.) with 5% mac. slopes 0505 transition lip between curb ramp and sidewalk <1/4" high; (No Barrier) — N/A 0506 transition lip between curb ramp and sidewalk 1/4"< x <1/2" high; (MI) — grind down (1:2 max. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder. — feather out at 1:2 mac slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 0507 transition lip between curb ramp and sidewalk 1/2"< x <1" high; (PSH) — grind down (1:12 mac. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:12 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 0508 transition lip between curb ramp and sidewalk is greater than 1" high; (PSH) — grind down (1:12 mac. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:12 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 06 - Width of Curb Ramp 0601 the width of the running slope of the ramp 29" < x < 36"; (MI) - postpone modification of sidewalk until scheduled street alteration project 0602 the width of the running slope of the ramp is less than 29"; (BA) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at comer — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 07 - Surface Conditions of Curb Ramp 0701 the surface of the curb ramp has cracks (lips) or irregularities 1/4"< x <I/2" high; (MI) — grind down (1:2 max slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:2 mac slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 0702 the surface of the curb ramp has cracks (lips) or irregularities higher than 1/2"; (PSH) — grind down (1:12 mac. slope) the concrete lip with a power grinder — feather out at 1:12 max. slope the transition with a non -shrink grout 0703 the surface of the curb ramp (including metal cover plates, grates, etc.) could be slippery when wet; (PSH) — paint slippery surface with aggregate non -slip coating 0704 grating with slots wider than 1/2" is on approach route; (PSH) — replace the grating with slots perpendicular to direction of travel less than 1/7" wide 08 - Wayfinding Issues for those with Visual Impairments 0801 for diagonal curb ramps, there is no 24" wide portion of curb within cross walks; (MI) — remove existing and install a new diagonal curb ramp at apex of corner — remove existing and install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at corner — remove existing and install a pair of new parallel curb ramps due to lack of walk depth — remove existing and install a single new parallel curb ramp at this location — remove existing and install a custom designed engineered solution — installation of an accessible curb ramp appears infeasible — postpone modification of curb ramp until scheduled street alteration project 0802 object(s) on the approach routes project 4"-6" into the path between 27"-80" high; (MI) — screen off existing element as required for cane cue 0803 object(s) on the approach routes project more than 6" into path between 27"-80" high; (PSH) — screen off existing element as required for cane cue 09 - Island/Median Crossings 0901 there is no curb ramp or level cut at the island/median cross walks; (BA) — install a new level cut (3' wide min.) at the island/median crosswalk — install a pair of new flared side curb ramps at comer — install a pair of new return curb ramps if area adjacent is not a pedestrian area — install a single new return curb ramp at this location — install a custom designed engineered solution for island/median cut — installation of an accessible curb ramp/island cut appears infeasible 0902 the running slope of the island cut is less than 2%; (No Barrier) — N/A 0903 the running slope of the island cut is 2%< x <5%; (No Barrier) — N/A 0904 the running slope of the island cut is 5%< x <8.3%; (MI) — remove existing cut, install a new level cut (3' wide min.) at the island/nredian crosswalk — install a custom designed engineered solution for island/median cut installation of an accessible curb ramp/island cut appears infeasible 0905 the running slope of the island cut is greater than 8.3%; (PSH) — remove existing cut, install a new level cut (3' wide min.) at the island/median crosswalk — install a custom designed engineered solution for island/nredian cut — installation of an accessible curb ramp/island cut appears infeasible 0906 the cross slope of the island cut is less than 2%, (No Barrier) — N/A 0907 the cross slope of the island cut is 2%< x <5%; (MI) — remove existing cut, install a new level cut (3' wide min.) at the island/median crosswalk — install a custom designed engineered solution for island/median cut — installation of an accessible curb ramp/island cut appears infeasible 0908 the cross slope of the island cut is 5%< x <8.3%; (PSH) — remove existing cut, install a new level cut (3' wide min.) at the island/median crosswalk — install a custom designed engineered solution for island/median cut — installation of an accessible curb ramp/island cut appears infeasible 0909 the cross slope of the island cut is greater than 8.3%; (PSH) — remove existing cut, install a new level out (3' wide min.) at the island/median crosswalk — install a custom designed engineered solution for island/median cut — installation of an accessible curb ramp/island cut appears infeasible 10 - Sidewalk approach from Bus Stop 1001 the running slope along the sidewalk approach is 5%< x <8.3%; (MI) 1002 the running slope along the sidewalk approach is 8.3%o< x <12%; (MI) 1003 the running slope along the sidewalk approach is greater than 12%; (PSH) 1004 the cross slope along the sidewalk approach is 2%< x <4%; (MI) 1005 the cross slope along the sidewalk approach is 40/o< x <8.3%; (Ml) 1006 the cross slope along the sidewalk approach is greater than 8.3%; (PSH) 12 - Miscellaneous Accessibility Issues 1201 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix F HCIL "Curb Cut Installation Priority Study" Findings and HCIL Flyer for Study Input JOU 23 198 06:33 HECKER DESIGN LTD. 205 444 2310 .0: 808 9462253 P03 Curb Cut Installation Priority Study Findings as of January 23, 1998 Prepared for: Public Information Meeting on the "Self Evaluation Of Policies and Practices Related to Streets and Sidewalks" January 24, 1998 Kristine K. Takemoto Research & Training Associate Hawaii Centers for Independent Living Rehabilitation Research & Training Center of the Pacific Interwork Institute/San Diego State University NOU 23 198 06:33 HECKER DESIGN LTD_ 205 444 2310 .0: BOB 9462253 PO4 Curb Cut Installation Priority Study Findings as of Jan nary 23, 1998 (N-80) I. Intersection Ranking According to the data collected through January 23, 1998, the top 6 intersections identified for curb out installation/modification are: Beretania & Bishop Kapiolani Blvd. & Keeatrmoku Kamehameha Hwy. & Pali Momi Kamehameha Hwy. & Kaonohi Punchbowl & Beretania II. Destination Prioritization 1,2 1,2 1,2 4,2 1,1 2,1 5, 2 According to respondents surveyed is this study, the top 5 destinations identified by likert scale values for curb cut installationtmodification are: Rank Destination Mean Score 1 Health Centers/Hospitals 6.41 2 Bus Stops/Transit Centers 6.32 3 Shopping Centers/Grocery Stores 6.14 4 Educational Institutions/Schools 6.13 5 Social Service Agencies 6.05 These destinations were measured on a scale from 1-7, 1= "Not Important".7= `Very Important' locations for the installation of curb cuts. Scores reported are the mean value for each destination listed. M. General Concerns ** Many respondents replied that due to the inaccessibility of current transportation modalities, they are unable to comment on the wider range ofspecific barriers Involved in transporting themselves from one location to another. "All parks parking lots need attention to poor pavement. Surfaces have potholes, broken/cracked surfaces or loose gravel where it is not swept off as it should be to create Curb Cur Installation Priority Study -Preliminary Findings (124198) NOV 23 198 06=34 HECKER DESIGN LTD. 205 444 2310 .J= 808 9462253 a smooth, flat surface. Many broken, cracked city sidewalks need to be repaired especially at city bus stops—they are also filthy, as are the parks bathrooms, shamefully so!" "(We need curb ramps at) some areas in the old parts of downtown ---in fact, (we need curb cuts at) any old building that does not have curb cuts, all over the island, or islands." "I believe every intersection and access way to buildings, both public and private, should have ramps or curb cuts installed. I need all the help I can get to gain access with my walker and cane." "(I am) unable to get around, however there should be curb cuts at every intersection in the city!– especially hospitals, banks, stores, 6tc." "I think all areas should have curb cuts." "Let's see some action be done!! Don't just say 'you'll try'—Just do itl" "I feel people in wheelchairs are the same as regular people and should be able to go anywhere and do anything without having difficulty in the process." "Some comers do not have cement!" IV. Information about the Sample N=80 Sex: Male – 38 Female = 41 No Response = 1 Age: Range = 20-80 years Mean – 47.92 years Use Mobility Device?: What Mobility Device?: Yes = 46 No – 33 No Response = 1 Powered Wheelchair = 12 Manual Wheelchair = 17 Walker – I Crutches = 4 Cane – 11 Other = 1 Curb Cut Installation Priority Study -Preliminary Findings (1/24/98) mm NOV 23 '98 06:35 HECKER DESIGN LTD. Ethnicity: Caucasian (White) — 30 African American (Black) _ Asian — 19 Hispanic = 2 Native American Indian = I Pacific Islander - 9 Other =17 No Response — I occupation? Yes = 20 No -58 No Response — 2 205 444 2310 J: 808 9462253 R06 Curb Cut Installation Priority Study -Preliminary Findings (1/24/98) IOV 23 198 06:35 HECKER DESIGN LTD. 205 444 2310 808 9462253 c i �� Do YOU Pms getting sidewalks City a onolulu f ently workimis on ving the acility of our streets 'dewalks. We infarnation from to ma orntnunit� cc Bible. SOt vey forms are available from the Havi01i Centerk for Independent Living. Call kiistine K. Takemoto at 522-5413 or small: ktakemot.DiverseAbilities.org (SUM00 also available /n BraN/e and large print) P07 ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix G Sample of Surveyors' Field Notes and Sketch Large -Scale Curb Ramp Model Recommendation Form Photo Log Sheet ❑ ARCHITECTURAL ❑ STRUCTURAL D CIVIL ❑ PLANNING ILSON OKAMOTO & A,. OCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS • PLANNERS COMPUTED BY PROJECT CHECKED BY SHEET NO._ OF SHEET DATE JUL 29 19_ PAUPuk a sr. GI-I�v2o'J s -c�aco <�,SrR-0� TKofFtc �� roves — CoVER- j p.. F>:or 1fR+C i ws1. �n�ti ✓ 3/c or�P AVe ?ccc.FsrR-Ing _ ��yc�� PJSV-1 f�i..'�T 51 51' li4 Deep 0 48" / i� � Arz MooWV_-E ) Intersection: 2R �) it a b c d e t g h i J k I m n o p q r a t u v w Element -In an in do -in do -in ft4n % n. m. n. m. A 'w 4 4 o, s's 8.1 Z.3 -1.3 0.3 (;,l B 3' 'G. 't- 9.\ 1•l 1.9 &.2 0.1 C Z(< 4' 3'0 / L' 44 oz z. 7.L / I, 5.0 [e,� D $ 4' Q' 4 -I'lo 0' V ,U .Z (c •9 129 lo$ �j'.2 62 E4' $'lo i. Z�- -0.1 Lc o,) m6 11.5 0.1 0'z 01 (,,S 4 5,0 0,8 0.f F lo' 4' 4' 4'f b'4 z'b B' 13 -19 9.15 1. ro 0 cll3.0 0.2 a b 3.3 oz G H I J j1 � ��JIJIII 1 �r_ Curb Ramp Survey Checklist IE a Width of Sidewalk n Slope of Flare b Width of Flare o Cross Slope of Sidewalk c Width of Running Slope of Ramp p Running Slope of Sidewalk d Width of Flare q Street Slope (w/in 48") e Distance of Crosswalk from Ramp r Gutter Slope f Length of Ramp s Street Slope (w/in 48") g Length of Landing t Curb Height h Width of Sidewalk u Curb Height i Cross Slope of Sidewalk v Transition Lip Between Gutter and Road j Running Slope of Sidewalk w Transition Lip Between Gutter and Road k Running Slope of Ramp I Cross Slope of Ramp m Slope of Flare ADA Curb Ramp Recommendations Form Cross Street 1 : KA4AGt4AMq�4q nye Bus Stop: yes o Cross Street 2 : F1-,QfM A\ 4rc Surveyor: RQF Cross Street 3 Intersection # : 2tzot51 Priority I : coOl school Date : July Zq ,1998 Priority II : Res. Rural Health Comm Dodos Agricultural Parks Element Severity Item #1 Item #2 Item #3 Item #4 Item #S Item #6 Item #7 Remarks 0408 04X3 5D1 I.J 0 B MZ 03°3 / � �qa3 w G C �'SN oy D413 PSN 61 0?03 0403 044 0+2_1 GI) F s Cr2-a 04.2-1 SDI /. MZ 611P P ° 3 G H I J Additional Remarks : Wilson Okamoto & Associates, Inc. ADA - Big Island ADA Photo Log Surveyor: RQF Date : August 2 ,1998 Photocard Photo No. Cross Streets Intersection No. Element Shot No. 1 r -0"-4A 2 3-I A 2 MQ 0�1b `X Vj 1 3 v c 1 4 0 1 5 gaarnN ofi / 22otaa A 1 6 7 c 8 b I 9 I pA^�vn�a oR 2fLO13� v 10 Ut"IWP.I -aT 6 I 11 LkIAIWAI Hr / 2R-o14t� b I 12 uulwAl I 13 c I 14 aaayaJ / z(1 D 141 p I 15 `fArJ .,JaY Po I 16 \4p"l LR -019-2 (k I 17 k A J NA c t+ 2 18 f5 1 19 Pb 7- 20 20 P>A-fFRo N -r -r. 2R -u 143 A t 21 95 1 22 2- 23 23 LI p� ! 2ao q4 A 24 vel PH g 1 25 4Jt. \ w/ 29-019'5 A I 26 I o 1 art xr D- 2- 27 27 v 1 28 Ka'aw��ral v 1 2PoN+( 6 I 29 p�l�al arc R 1 30 u IJ1 c12- 2R-bt4't A ' 31 K AdNw B 1 32 C 33 �0 1 ZRo14� A I 34 ka Au yr Fs I 35 I�vr a 4sc 2R 0149 A I 36 r�nJrct E a . F3 1 37 '(uy-ow ST 220 V0 6 1 38 QM0K-0 A 1 39 1-4r4C- i Avg 2ablsl A 40 vdivAt I sir. Wilson Okamoto & Associate, Inc. ADA - Big Island ADA Photo Log Surveyor: RQF Date : August 1998 Photocard Photo No. Cross Streets Intersection No. Element Shot No. 41 7- 42 42 G 3 43 e 44 t3 2- 45 45 c 1 46 p 1 47 48 F- 49 49 ta- 1 50 KUK-VAU 51 FOFND-.o 52 IL - N 53 K QU 4sc. e• 1 54 c 1 55 1 56 923 kv�va.� 4sC d 1 57 HOKU 1�C 2Rpt--'t5 p. I 58 59 2- 60 60 61 p 1 62 kc aNAo 2Ro A 1 63 01 o 1 64 kG-1 NI 65 66 p A n zrzo�sa a 1 67 ti o'o c s r. P Z 68 & 1 69 c 1 70 0 l 71 1Dz 72 HD'O ht P / 2RD1 A 73 o'oLP�A �cr a 1 74 c 1 75 0 76 u o ntra r, z�o160 t, l 77 Nou I 79 80 Wilson Okamoto &Associate, Inc. ADA - Big Island ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Field Survey Procedure The field survey of existing curb ramps (at "Green" crossings) was conducted using the Master Coding List in (Appendix E), Surveyor's Field Notes and Sketch forms, the Curb Ramp Model, tape measure, and a digital slope meter. The Master Coding List was used to identify the specific features of the curb ramp that were to be surveyed, such as ramp slope, cross slope, flared side and protruding objects. The Surveyor's Field Notes and Sketch form was developed for efficient and consistent data collection by the field surveyors. This form includes an area to sketch the existing intersection, including each access element (i.e.: curb ramp, island cut, etc.). Below the sketch is a matrix into which reference codes and measurements were recorded. The surveyors used the Curb Ramp Model as a guide for collecting 23 specific measurements shown as items "a" through "w" using a tape measure and slope meter. After recording their measurements, the surveyors completed the Recommendation Form. This form recorded contextual information about each curb ramp, such as, its severity code, location priority, non -conforming element codes and proposed recommendation codes. Finally, digital photographs were taken to record pertinent information. Each photograph was recorded in the Photo Log. ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix H Intersections With Technically Infeasible Features ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps How To Read This Table Intersections with Technically Infeasible Features This table was included to document the intersections where one or more approaches have slopes greater than 5%. When this condition is present, there is little hope of installing an ADA compliant curb ramp. For a more detailed explanation of technically infeasible, see Section 2.3 of the narrative — Implementation Analysis Phase. The data in this table is shown in columns that are defined as follows: Column 1 — TMK Zone number that is part of the intersection ID system for the database (see Map in Volume 1 for a complete list of TMK Zones); Column 2 — Letter used to identify the surveyor for that intersection; Column 3 — Intersection number; Column 4 — Names of the cross streets at the intersection (three street names typically denote mid -block crossings or the intersection of three streets). The streets are listed alphabetically by the first letter of the street name and not by the relative size or traffic volume associated with the streets; and Column 5 — Estimated cost of scheduled modifications associated with this intersection. These costs are based on 1998 dollars and have not been adjusted for inflation. Intersections with Technically Infeasible Features Priority Cost Report Total Est. Cost = $444,500 Page 1 of 5 urterseodon lD cost 2 R 0081 AaO Pl. lloko 0 5 R 0287 Alnakea Dr. Hiwahiwa 0 5 R 0292 Ainakea Dr. Kolonahe 0 5 R 0290 Airwkee Dr. N. Kahim PI. S. KahMa PL 0 5 R 0289 Aimkea Dr. N. Kupa PL S. Kupa Pl. 4,500 2 K 0146 Ainako Ase. APoke 0 2 K 0145 Aimko Ave. Kapaa 6- 2 K 0144 Ainako Ave. Koula 0 2 K 0065 Ainaola Dr. Kadike 5,666- 2 R 0029 Ainaola Dr. Maumkai 0 2 R 0167 Ainaola Dr. W. Kawailani 1,000 2 K 0164 Aipuni Kaunana Dr. 0 8 R 0343 Aka Ala Napoopoo Rd. 500 2 K 0220 Akala Rd. Kaunana Dr. 0 2 K 0217 Akolea Rd. Kaumana Dr. 0 2 K 0183 Alahebnui Kaumam Dr. 0 2 K 0166 Alaheknui ohm 0 2 K 0176 Alapaki PI. Luam Way 7,000 7 K 0336 AN Dr. Kahaluu Beach Park Makolm 0 7 R 0349 AM Dr. KAuna 0 7 K 0295 Alike PI. Aloha Kona Dr. Poni PI. 21,000 7 R 0321 Aloha Kona Dr. lura Pl. 0 7 R 0322 Aloha Kona Dr. Kana Pl. 0 7 R 0320 Aloha Kona Dr. Kakalina 4,000 7 K 0294 Aloha Kona Dr. Kalala Pl. 0 7 R 0327 Aloha Kana Dr. Kele PI. Walola Pl. 0 7 R 0316 Aloha Kona Dr. Kini Lp. 500 7 R 0326 Aloha Kona Dr. Lilia Pl. Oleks Pl. 4,000 7 R 0329 Aloha Kona Dr. Lopeka PI. 0 7 R 0323 Aloha Kona Dr. Makelina Pl. 0 7 R 0325 Atha Kona Dr. Melelim 0 7 R 0324 Aloha Kone Dr. Milena PI. 0 7 R 0328 Aloha Kona Dr. Nele PL 0 7 R 0317 Aloha Kona Dr. Welo 0 7 R 0356 Aneana Hioleni 3,500 7 R 0357 Armana Kuakalw 0 2 R 0176 Anela W. Kawailani 0 8 K 0310 Adan Pl. Aolani 5,D00 2 K 0033 Awele Pl. Kikaha 0 2 K 0242 Basque Pl. Kaunam Dr. 0- 7 K 0326 Dead and Henry 10,000 7 R 0330 E. Kakalina Kakalina W. Kakalina 0 2 K 0221 Edita Kaunam Dr. 0 2 K 0101 Elepaio Haili 7,000 2 K 0022 Fumeau Ln. Kilauea 5,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Intersections with Technically Infeasible Features Priority Cost Report Page 2 of 5 Intersection 10 coat 1 K 0230 HM Keaau Lp. 0 Haiti Kilauea Ave. 7 K 0270 Haku PI. Kupure - - 0 2 K 0174 Halal Waianuerim Ave. 2,000 2 K 0004 HWwWni PI. Wainaku n way fn. LPKO 2 K 0163 Hale Wada u ue Ave. 6,000 7 K 0297 Habhau Keakeelani Dr. 500 8 K 0342 Halekii Mamalahoa Hwy, 0 8 K 0308 Haleldi Muli - 0-- 4 R 0217 Hem" Oosanview Subdiv. Old Mamalahoa Hwy. 4,500 7 R 0307 Hamharai PI. KumekarY 0 7 R 0300 Haraharai A. Uluaoa 4,500 7 R 0297 Hanahanai PI. Uluaoa 0 7 K 0265 Haoa Kahebu 7 K 0343 Haukapila Mamalahm Hwy. 2 R 0096 Heahea Pikili P1. -- 0 2 K 0179 Hele Mauna Huapala PI. 8,000 2 K 0188 Heb Mauna Impolena Rd. 0 7 K 0325 Henry Shopping Center 7,000 7 K 0345 Henry Wakmrt Drwy. 18,000 2 R 0063 Hilimi Hoopuni 0 2 R 0084 Hilinei Popdo 0 7 R 0353 Hblani PI. Hiolani 500 2 K 0181 Hokulani Kaumam Dr. 0 2 K 0205 Honlebni Ln. Pomhawai 5,000 2 R 0226 Hoohips PI. Kaakepa 0 6 R 0277 Hwna PI. Hutu 3,000 2 R 0060 Hoopuni Kumukoa 0 0306 HLaala Kumakani 7 R 0296 Huaala Uluaoe 0 7 K 0320 Huablai Rd. Kuakini Hwy. 6,000 7 K 0335 Hualalai Rd. Lako 500 2 R 0144 Huali PI. Huali Way 0 2 R 0145 Huafi PI. Komoham 0 Hualilili Kaum na Dr. Pumhele 2 R 0101 Hueu PI. Ohukm 0 6 R 0275 Hulu Kimo-Nui 4,000 500 2 K 0165 Ikem PI. Kaum na Dr. 0 2 R 0061 Iloko Kumukoa 0 2 K 0193 loam Puhili 16.000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Intersections with Technically Infeasible Features Priority Cost Report 0 7 R 0351 Kamehamehe III Rd. Kaauhou Shoppkg Center entrance (Private Rd.) Page 3 of 5 kttersecbon 10 0 2 K 0108 Kapioarn MWauli cost 6 R 0249 Wituamoo Dr. Kupunskane PI. 0 2 K 0160 Kaumarre Dr. Lele Waanuenue Ave. 0 2 R 0227 Kaakepa Kumua 0 2 K 0218 Kaumana Dr. Pamolw Rd. 0 2 R 0148 Kaanini Kukwu 0 2 K 0203 Kaumena Dr. Uluhe Rd. Wikler Rd. 0 2 R 0147 Kaanini Cir. Kaanini 0 2 R 0001 Kevraiani Maiani 8.000 2 R 0146 Keanini PI. Kaanlni 0 7 R 0310 Keaakehe Lapa Nui 0 7 K 0281 Kaheieu Kyndri 0 7 K 0282 Kaheiau Leko 2,000 2 R 0056 Kahikaw Kukuau 3,000 2 R 0052 Ka41i Nae 0 8 R 0347 Kamakani Mamaahoa Hvn. .. 7 R 0352 Kameluneha III Rd. Keehi 0 7 R 0351 Kamehamehe III Rd. Kaauhou Shoppkg Center entrance (Private Rd.) 3,500 2 K 0011 Kara Puueo 0 2 K 0108 Kapioarn MWauli 0 2 R 0091 Kapiciani W. Lanikaula 8,000 2 R 0180 Kapuslani W. KawallaN 0 2 K 0190 Kaumana Dr. A oko Ave. (Private Rd.) 0 2 K 0189 Kaurnana Dr. Aipuni (Private Rd.) 0 2 K 0199 Kaunane Dr. Amu Rd. Old Kaumana Rd. 0 2 K 0160 Kaumarre Dr. Lele Waanuenue Ave. 25,000 2 K 0185 Kaumane Dr. Maama PI. Terrace Dr. 0 2 K 0218 Kaumana Dr. Pamolw Rd. 0 2 K 0186 Kaumana Dr. Terrace Dr. 0 2 K 0203 Kaumena Dr. Uluhe Rd. Wikler Rd. 0 2 K 0201 Kaumana Dr. Wilder Rd. 0 2 R 0001 Kevraiani Maiani 8,000 7 R 0332 Kawena Kmi LP. 0 7 R 0310 Keaakehe Lapa Nui 0 Onipea I K UzWo Kealapua UMa0a 0 7 R 0305 Keeapua PI. Keaapua Kumakani 0 7 K 0261 KeabN IGipchaku 1,000 7 K 0262 Keablu KnbNs 7,000 2 K 0040 Keaws Wailuku Dr. 0 8 K 0316 Kee Kee Marnaahoe Hwy. 0 7 K 0277 Kekai Kenika PI. 1,000 2 K 0194 Keo Puhtli 8,000 2 R 0134 Keokolo PI, Wendria 0 3 R 0220 Kihaani Homestead Rd. LauPahoshoe H. S. Drury. 0 2 K 0046 Kihonua PI. Puhau 0 7 K 0259 KNiPohaku Wane 5,000 L K UU4`J rurana Maurm Kai 0 9 R 0205 Kikka Ohai Rd. 0 8 R 0345 Me Rd. Mamaahoa H". 0 8 R 0344 Kiba Rd. Mauka of Kealakekua S. C. -1,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Intersections with Technically Infeasible Features Priority Cost Report Page 4 of 5 hltersection ID Cost 2 R 0161 Kim PI. W. Kewailerw 0 2 R 0086 KmDole W. Kawailani 3,500 7 K 0274 Koko Olua Pl. Kokua Oka 0 7 K 0273 Koko Olua Pl. Kupuna 0 7 K 0276 Koldia KUPurm s nnn 2 R 0102 Knnahena Kukuau 0 2 K 0171 Komoherw Waianuenue Ave. 6,000 8 K 0337 Konanaena Scholl Rd. Ellison Onizuka Gym 0 8 K 0339 Konawaena School Rd. Konaweena Mid. School Dray. 0 8 K 0340 Korawaena School Rd. Mamalshoa Hwy, 0 8 K 0338 Korawasna Schod Rd, Mindm Gabby Inaba Tennis Courts 9 7 K 0330 Kopiko Palani Rd. 14,500 4 R 0210 Kou Pakaana 0 7 R 0358 Kuakapu Paiaha 3,500 2 R 0149 Kuknau Manele Ln. 9 2 R 0152 Kuknau Popolo 0 2 R 0018 Kukuau Ululani 0 4 R 0214 Kukui Pakalana 17,500 2 R 0117 Kulamanu PI. Oihana 8,000 2 R 0049 Kumukoa Noe 7 K 0266 Kunihi Kupura 0 3,500 7 K 0267 Kupima Kunihi (Private Rd.) 4,000 7 K 0269 Kupuna Lako 2,500 7 K 0275 Kupaa Leone PI. 9,009 7 K 0271 Kupaw Mahuahue PI. 9,000 7 K 0285 Kupuna Oma PI. 7,000 7 K 0286 Kupsna Royal Poinciana Dr. 0 7 K 0272 Kupuna Uuku PI. 9 5 R 0361 Kynnersley Rd. Akoni Pule Hwy. Kaauhuhu Rd. 9 2 R 0058 Lahou Ohukea 0 7 K 0283 Lako Leone Leone Way 4 R 0209 Lahua Pakalana 2 R 0027 Unaka Pdakiko 4,000 0 5,000 9 R 0204 Lokelsni Ohai Rd. 0 2 K 0248 Lcuki Ln. Porahawai 500 7 K 0332 Manalahoa Hwy. Holueba Poet Office 0 4 K 0352 Mamas» St parking W Kontaka PI, 8 K 0315 Mamic Marawa 0 9 8 K 0307 Manowa Mini 0 2 K 0168 Manu PI. Mokihans 2 R 0162 Mikihala W. Kawailani 0 0 7 K 0292 Milkilana Olomea PI. 1,000 2 K 0167 Mokihana Oona 9 8 K 0309 Will Naps 9 2 R 0098 N. Aohoku Pl. NOWel0 9 R 0203 Nahele Ohai Rd. 9 9 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Intersections with Technically Infeasible Features Priority Cost Report Page 5 of 5 Intersection 10 4 R 0212 Nakanwlli PI. Pakahna Cost 7 K 0293 Neni Kailas Dr. Pukaarq Dr. 0 7 R 0355 Nawahie Oneone 0 4 R 0211 Ohai Pakalerm 3,500 9 R 0206 Ohai Rd. Opukea 0 1 K 0234 Okl Vobara Rd. KeaearPeha Rd. Mib 0 1 K 0231 Old Volarw Rd. Private Rd. Underpass 4,000 2 R 0041 Oneeawa Pl. Oneawa Way 0 4 R 0215 Pakalana Kukui School Rd. 0 0 4 R 0216 Pakalam Mamane Sclwd Rd. 6 R 0342 Pae Melia Waikoba Rd. 0 0 2 R 0010 Puheu W. Kawani 5,000 2 K 0045 Puhau PI. Puhau 5,000 2 K 0195 PuhiF PI. Puhili 12,000 2 K 0162 Pun Waianu— — — 9,500 2 K 0098 Puuh— PI. Puuhonu Way —7K 0 0288 Royal Pofncana Dr. Pluneria Rd. Royal Pokrcciana PI. 500 7 K 0287 Royal PN—M DrRcyal Pdnciana PI. 1,000 1 R 0196 Umuhi W. Uhwhi Lp. 0 7 R 0298 Uluaa PI. Uluaa 0 2 K 0245 Waienuanue Ave. Hib High Sch. entrance Hb Int Sch. Exit 4 000 2 R 0197 Waenuhea PI. Waianiirea Way 3,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Intersections with Technically Infeasible Features ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix I U.S. Dept of Justice Technical Assistance Letter on Curb Ramps #0149 ,IttP://www.usdoj-gov/crt/foia/taIO49.tx U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Office of the Assistant Attorney General Washington, D.C. 20035 Mr. Kenneth M. Lesser First vice -President Association of City Employees with Disabilities 706 North Vendome Street Los Angeles, California 90026 Dear Mr. Lesser: This is in response to your letter about the provision of curb cuts under title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Your letter also asked about available remedies under title II and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. The ADA authorizes the Department to provide technical assistance to entities that are subject to the Act. This letter provides informal guidance to assist you in understanding how the ADA may apply to public entities. This technical assistance, however, does not constitute a determination by the Department of Justice of rights or responsibilities under the ADA and does not constitute a binding determination by the Department of Justice. Title II prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all programs, activities, and services provided or made available by State and local governments, instrumentalities, or agencies. The title II regulation (enclosed) is based on regulations implementing section 504. Like the section 504 rule, the title II rule provides that a public entity must not deny the benefits of its programs, activities, and services to individuals with disabilities because its facilities are inaccessible (535.149). A public entity's services, programs, or activities, when viewed in their entirety, must be readily accessible to and usable by individuals with 01-00703 disabilities. A public entity, however, is not necessarily required to make each of its existing facilities accessible. Nor does a public entity have to take any action that it can demonstrate would result in a fundamental alteration in the nature of its program or activity or in undue financial and administrative burdens (535.150(a)). Section 35.150(d)(2) of the title II rule states that public entities with responsibility for or authority over streets, roads, or walkways must prepare a schedule for providing curb ramps where pedestrian walks cross curbs. Priority must be given to walkways serving State and local government offices and facilities, transportation, places of public accommodation, and employers, followed by walkways serving other areas. This schedule must be included as part of a transition plan (S35.150(d)(2)). However, section 35.150 does not necessarily require a curb ramp at every intersection. Alternative routes to buildings that make use of existing curb cuts may be acceptable under the concept of program accessibility, even if an individual with disabilities may need to travel a longer route to reach a particular building than would a nondisabled individual. In residential areas, as opposed to commercial areas, it may be appropriate to establish a procedure for installing curb ramps upon request when an individual with disabilities moves into a neighborhood. Moreover, the fundamental alteration and undue http://www.usdoj.90v/crt/foia/ta1049.tx burdens defenses will limit the number of curb ramps required in many cases. In developing a transition plan to provide curb ramps, a public entity should consider all of these factors. In the case of new construction and alterations (as opposed to existing facilities), the rule requires that curb ramps be provided at any intersection having curbs or other barriers to entry from a street level pedestrian walkway (S35.151(e)). In response to your question about remedies, title II incorporates the remedies of section 505 of the Rehabilitation Act, which include court orders to stop discrimination, termination of Federal funds when there are Federal funds to 01-00704 - 3 - terminate, and damages in some circumstances. Penalties are not available. Nor is reimbursement of Federal funds an available remedy under title II or section 504. I hope this information has been helpful to you. Sincerely, John R. Dunne Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division Enclosure 01-00705 I IllQ/OR 1n -n0 A, ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Appendix J Detailed Implementation Schedule ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps How To Read This Schedule Detailed Implementation Schedule The implementation schedule documents which intersections will be modified under the ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan and the year in which it is scheduled to be modified. To assist the reader in finding a particular intersection, the schedule has been divided into six tables. Each table lists the modifications scheduled for the fiscal year noted at the top of the sheet. Each table is titled "Priority Cost Report" because they were ranked initially by the total intersection priority number and divided by the six years of the implementation period to arrive at the estimated cost per year. The data in the schedule is shown in columns that are defined as follows: Column 1 — TMK Zone number (see attached Map for a complete list of TMK Zones); Column 2 — Letter used to identify the surveyor for that intersection; Column 3 — Intersection number; Column 4 — Names of the cross streets at the intersection (three street names typically denote mid -block crossings or the intersection of three streets). The streets are listed alphabetically by the first letter of the street name and not by the relative size or traffic volume associated with the streets; Column 5 — Pedestrian Priority; Column 6 — Bus Priority; Column 7 — Destination Priority; Column 8 — Severity Priority; Column 9 — Location Priority; Column 10 — Overall Priority; and Column 11 — Estimated cost of scheduled modifications associated with this intersection. These costs are based on 1998 dollars and have not been adjusted for inflation. v \ SOUTH KON. uc \ 1 k— \ KAAU //l i HA Si 1 NOF? THOKONA m A UAn H 1 O I SOUTH HILO t INDEX MAP OF HAWAII 3RD DIVISION LEGEND © one nu�we `nnv ia AAAS-A- ii ii 1 Puna 2 South Hilo 3 North Hilo 4 Hamakua 5 North Kohala 6 South Kohala 7 North Kona 8 South Kona 9 Kau Detailed Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Total Est. Cost for 2000 = $903,500 Pagel of 1 2 K 0119 Ahmhe Ipuka 2 0 6 7 4 19 30,000 2 K 0067 /upon' K'lauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 14,000 2 R 0079 Aupuni Pauahi 2 0 6 7 4 19 17,000 2 K 0068 Barenaba Ln. Kilauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 13,000 2 R 0109 E. Lanikaula laukapu 2 0 5 7 4 18 4,000 2 K 0021 Funa+aux Ln. Keaae2 0 5 7 4 18 49,000 2 R 0069 Fu mLn. Purrehoa 2 0 5 7 4 18 21,000 2 K 0002 Hadi Ke 2 0 5 7 4 18 73,000 2 R 0002 Heli Kilaum Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 4,000 2 K 0017 Haile Nnoole 2 0 5 7 4 18 66,500 2 K 0060 Hoku Kilauea A". 2 0 5 7 4 18 22,000 2 R 0038 Hoke lunoole 2 0 5 7 4 18 15,000 2 K 0092 Hmlalai Kapiolani 2 0 6 7 4 19 22,000 2 K 0059 Hualalsi Mauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 12,000 2 R 0037 Hualalai Kinoole 2 0 5 7 4 18 55,500 2 R 0035 Hualalai Maus Loa 2 0 5 7 4 18 6,000 2 K 0103 Hualalai Ululani 2 0 6 7 4 19 12,000 2 K 0250 Huapala Ln. Kilauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 41000 2 R 0064 Kalakaua Kamehameha Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 39,500 2 K 0003 Kalakaua Kmwe 2 0 5 7 4 18 36,000 2 R 0136 Kalanikoa Ku 2 0 6 7 4 19 23,000 2 K 0074 Kamana Kilauea Ave._ 2 0 5 7 4 18 39,000 2 R 0045 Pae mana Kinoola 2 0 5 7 4 18 21,000 2 R 0075 Kamehanaha A". Mauro 2 0 5 7 4 18 291000 2 R 0072 Kamehameha Ave. Nawahi Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 12,000 2 R 0151 Kamehawha Ave. Pamhi 2 0 5 7 4 18 26,000 2 R 0071 Kamehmneha Ave. Ponaha i 2 0 5 7 4 18 25,000 2 R 0065 Kamehameha Ave. Shipman 2 0 5 7 4 18 6,000 2 K 0087 Ka" Kilauea Ave. 2 0 6 7 4 19 27,000 2 R 0005 Kakaulike Shipman 2 0 6 7 4 19 24,000 2 K 0054 Kakaulike Wwanuenue Ave. 2 0 6 7 4 19 29,500 2 R 0004 Kakaulike Wailuku Dr.. 2 0 6 7 4 19 10,000 2 K 0071 IGlauea Ave. Mohouli 2 0 6 7 4 19 14,000 2 K 0085 Kilauea Ave. W. Lanikaula 2 0 6 7 4 19 16,000 2 R 0044 Knob Lanihuk 2 0 6 7 4 19 19,000 2 K 0015 Kmocle Waianu mAve. 2 0 6 7 4 19 19,000 2 K 0055 Ululani Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 6 7 4 19 21,500 2 K 0245 Waian"m Ase. Hilo High Sch. entrance Hilo IM. Sch. 5 0 4 7 4 20 18,000 2 K 0246 Waianuenue Ave. Hilo High Sch, ezit Hib Int. Sch, entrance 5 0 4 7 4 20 9,000 Total Estimated Cost for 2000 = $903,500 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Detailed Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Total Est. Cost for 2001 = $925,000 Page 1 of 1 krtersection ID Ped. Bus Dest Sev. Loc Total cost 7 K 0320 Hualaiai Rd. KUWkini Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 53,000 2 K 0108 Ipuka Kapbwri Waiba 2 0 4 7 4 17 33,500 2 K 0016 Kalakaua Kiraole 2 0 4 7 4 17 45,000 2 K 0121 Kapidani Kukuau 1 0 3 7 4 is 16,000 2 K 0020 Kaawe Marro 2 0 5 7 4 18 51,500 27R 0003 Ka Shoran 1 0 5 7 4 17 78,000 2 K 0039 Keawe Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 54,000 2 K 0040 Keawe Wailuku Dr. 2 0 5 7 4 18 37,000 2 K 0072 Kakuanaos Kilauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 27,000 2 K 0057 Mlauea Ave. Kukuau 2 0 5 7 4 18 41,000 2 K 0019 IGlauea Ave. Marta 2 0 5 7 4 18 50,000 2 K 0251 IGlausa Ave. Osodo Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 8,000 2 K 0058 Kilauea Ave. Pauahi 2 0 5 7 4 18 28,000 2 K 0056 Kdaues Ave. Ponahawai 2 0 5 7 4 18 40,500 2 K 0066 IGiwea Ave. Wilson 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 2 R 0019 Knoole Kukusu 2 0 5 7 4 18 38,000 2 R 0046 Knoole Lora 2 0 5 7 4 18 23,000 2 K 0018 IGraole Marro 2 0 5 7 4 i8 73,000 2 R 0016 IGneale Porwhewai 1 0 6 7 4 18 64,000 2 R 0088 Mnoob W. KavAi 2 0 5 7 4 18 19,000 2 R 0039 Knoole Waite 2 0 5 7 4 18 20,000 2 K 0099 Komohana Puuhonu PI. 2 0 5 7 4 18 17.000 2 R 0074 Mann Punahoa 2 0 5 7 4 18 73,000 1 K 0234 Old Vobarro Rd. Keaau-Pahoa Rd.Mio 2 0 4 7 2 15 5,500 6 R 0342 Pus Melia Waikoba Rd. 1 0 6 7 2 16 14,000 2 K 0104 Mimi Mita 2 0 4 7 4 17 11,000 Total Estimated Cost for 2001 = $925,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Detailed Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Total Est. Cost for 2002 = $846,500 Page 1 of 2 2 K 0105 Akahi Wake 2 0 4 0 4 10 20,000 2 K 0173 Alae Ekpab 2 0 4 0 4 10 5,000 2 K 0095 Also Laimana 2 0 5 0 4 11 29 500 7 K 0301 Nil Dr. Adi Barisal Plaza 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 7 K 0318 Ala Dr. Kahikuu Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 1,000 7 K 0305 AM Dr. Likana Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 7,000 2 R 0138 Banyan Dr. Llhivni 1 0 5 7 4 17 17,000 2 K 0349 Bayfront Parking lot Kamehameha Ave. Pauahi 2 0 4 0 4 10 5,000 2 R 0068 Fumea= Ln. Kamehamahs Ave. 2 0 5 0 -411 18,000 2 K 0022 Fumeaux Ln. Kilauea 2 0 5 0 4 11 7,000 2 K 0097 Haiti Kamakahonu 2 0 4 0 4 10 36,000 2 R 0067 Hadi Kameharneha Ave. 2 0 5 0 4 11 84,000 2 K 0135 Haiti KePidam 2 0 4 7 4 17 53,000 2 R 0021 Haiti Ululant 2 0 4 7 4 17 62,500 7 K 0322 Harema Pt. Kuakini Hwy, 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 7 K 0324 Henry Kuakni Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 10,000 7 K 0325 Henry shopping Center 2 0 5 7 4 18 6,000 7 K 0345 Henry Walman Dray. 2 0 5 7 4 18 8000 2 K 0120 Hdornalis Ipuka 2 0 4 0 4 10 15,000 2 K 0137 Homdani Ln. Kapioleni 2 0 4 0 4 10 28,500 6 R 0253 Hooko Wk=noo Dr. 2 0 4 7 2 15 12,000 2 R 0036 Hualalai Mauna Kea 1 0 5 7 4 17 2,000 7 K 0319 Kaahumanu Pi. Petard Rd. 2 0 5 7 4 18 500 2 K 0102 Kaiulan Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 4 7 4 17 20,000- 7 K 0331 Kewi Kuakiri Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 10,000 7 K 0321 Kalani Kuakni Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 2 R 0076 KArnehameha Ave. Pauahi Ponahawai 2 0 4 7 4 17 4,000 2 R 0066 Kamahameha Ave. Waianuenue Ave. 1 0 5 7 4 17 51,500 2 K 0139 Kapiolani Hornelani Mohala PI. 2 0 4 0 4 10 19,000 2 K 0136 KapiWni Whale PI. 2 0 4 0 4 10 14,500 2 K 01 D6 Kapidani Mdwuti 2 0 4 0 4 10 10,000 2 R 0106 Kepidani Ponahawai 2 0 5 0 4 11 23,000 2 R 0090 Kapidani W. Kawili 2 0 4 7 4 17 5,000 2 R 0091 Kapioleni W. Lanikaula 2 0 4 7 4 17 5,000 2 K 0138 Kapiotani Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 4 7 4 17 23,500 2 K 0131 Ka nnana Dr. N. Wilt Wili B. Wili Wil! 2 0 5 7 3 17 4,000 2 R 0241 Keaws Waianuenue Ave. Parking lot 1 0 6 0 4 11 4,000 2 R 0020 Kltauea Ave. Aala Ln Kukuau 2 0 4 7 4 17 9,000 2 K 0069 Kilauea Ave. Barenaba Ln. Mails 2 0 4 7 4 17 12,000 2 K 0083 IOtaues Ave. Kohota 1 0 5 7 4 17 6,000 2 K 0084 Kilauea Ave. L.ono 2 0 4 7 4 17 261000 2 R 0040 Winoole Mohoua 2 0 4 7 4 17 29,000 2 R 0013 !Groote Wailuku Dr.1 --2 0 6 0 4 11 10,000 K 0170 Kamohana Punahele 2 0 6 0 4 12 25,000 7 K 0328 K� kini Hwy. Llkans Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 7 K 0353 Kuakin! Hwy. Likana Ln. parking krt 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 7 K 0346 Kuakini Hwy. Likana Ln. parking lot 2 0 5 7 4 18 5.000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report kMersaetion10 Kualani Hwy. Palani Rd. FY 2002 Pad. Bus Page 2 of 2 Total cos, 2 K U124 KUKuaa uwreni 2 0 - 5 0 4 11-13.000 2 R 0105 Lanihuli Lei2 0 5 0 4 11 15,000 2 R 0015 Lkiokalani Panai a i 1 05 04 10 15 000 2 R 0103 Mdauli KAauea Ave. Lei 2 0 4 1 4 17 8,000 2 R 0070 Ponahawai Punahaa 2 0 5 0 4 11 16,000 Total Estimated Cost for 2002 = ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Detailed Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Total Est. Cost for 2003 = $887,000 Page 1 of 2 2 K 0153 Anmko Ave. Laukona -- 2 0 4 0 3 9 15,000 7 K 0300 Ali Dr. Kahakai Rd. 2 0 5 7 3 17 5,000 7 R 0348 AN Dr. Kamehanmha III Rd. 2 0 5 7 2 16 12,000 7 K 0344 Ali Dr. Keauhw Beach Hath Dewy. 2 0 5 7 2 16 5,000 7 K 0303 Alii Dr. St Michael's Church 2 0 4 0 4 10 10,000 2 K 0008 Arnauulu Rd. Ohai wairmku 1 0 5 0 2 8 50.000 2 R 0175 Andrews Ave. Kalanianaob Ave. Keokea Lp. 1 0 5 7 3 16 18,000 2 R 0143 Bayfront Hwy. Kanmhenmha Ave. 1 0 4 7 4 16 15,000 7 K 0326 Dead and Henry 1 0 5 7 4 17 28 000 2 K 0101 Elepaio Hail! 1 0 3 7 4 15 30,500 6 R 0314 Emnmlani Huiukupura 1 0 6 0 2 9 17,000 2 K 0001 Haiti Kanmhemaha Ave. 2 0 2 7 4 15 20,000 8 K 0342 Halakii Mamalahoa Hwy- 2 0 5 7 2 16 5,000 5 R 0359 Hor o akau Rd. Agriculture Bldg. 2 0 4 0 2 8 15,000 5 R 0360 Horomakau Rd. Akon1 Pule Hwy, 2 0 4 0 2 8 15,000 6 R 0254 Hooko hml uamoo Dr. Panblo Ave. 2 0 4 7 2 15 8,000 6 R 0270 Hook- Paniolo 2 0 4 _7 2 15 28,000 2 R 0014 Irwin Ululani 1 0 2 0 4 7 12,000 1 K 0228 Kahakei Blvd. Keonepoko Elam, Sch. entrance 2 0 4 7 1 14 5,000 1 K 0229 Kahakai Blvd. Keonepoko Elam. Sch. ewt 2 0 4 7 1 14 5,000 8 R 0347 Kamaken! Mamamhoa Hwy. 1 0 6 7 2 16 7,000 7 R 0351 Kamehamehe III Rd. Keaufcu Shopping Center entrance (Private Rd) 2 0 5 7 2 16 4,000 1 K 0207 Kaohe HmsW. Rd. Perm School Gym 2 0 4 0 2 8 20,000 2 K 0160 Kaumana Dr. Lela Waianuenue A". 1 0 4 7 3 15 12,000 2 R 0173 Kawailani Kilauea Ave. 1 0 4 7 3 16 19,000 7 R 0304 Kealakaa Kumakeni 2 0 4 0 3 9 15,000 8 K 0316 Kea Kee Marrmlahoa Hwy. 2 0 5 7 2 16 5,000 2 K 0073 Kilauea A". Lanihuli 2 0 2 0 4 8 5,000 2 K 0088 Kilauea Ave. Lahala Dr. 2 0 2 7 4 15 1,000 6 R 0335 K richou Mamalahos Hwy. 1 0 5 7 3 16 12,000 2 R 0238 KGnoole E. Kawailam E. Palai 2 0 4 7 3 16 6,500 2 R 0048 Kmoole Olam 2 0 4 7 4 17 9,000 2 R 0086 MrwW W. Kawailanl 2 0 5 7 3 17 8,000 S K 0340 Knnawmam Wool Rd. Mmnalahoe Hwy.2 0 4 7 2 15 3,000 2 R 0137 Kuawa Mariano 1 0 4 7 4 16 10,000 2 R 0150 Kukuau Kumukoa 1 0 3 0 4 8 10,000 2 R 0242 Kulaiwi Rd. Mamalahoe Hwy. 2 0 4 0 1 7 15,000 2 K 0096 Larrana Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 4 7 4 17 10,000 2 K 0005 Lehua Wainmku 2 0 4 0 2 8 35,000 2 R 0104 Lei Mohculi 1 0 4 7 4 16 34,000 2 R 0140 Linhvai Uhiwai 1 0 5 7 4 17 9,000 6 R 0333 Lindsey Rd. Mamalahoe Hwy. 1 0 5 7 3 16 40,000 6 R 0269 Lnm Kula Melia 1 0 5 0 2 8 8,000 6 R 0274 Lua Kula Paniolo Ave. 2 0 5 0 2 9 16,000 7 K 0348 Mamalahoa Hwy. Abhor Theatre 2 0 5 0 1 8 5,000 7 K 0334 Mamalahca Hwy. Holualoa Elam. School 2 0 4 0 2 8 19,000 8 R 0346 Mamalehoa Hwy. Kdoa Rd. Koa 1 0 - 5 0 2 -- 8 15,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report FY 2003 0 5 0 4 Page 2 of 2 hitersection ID Ped. Bus Dest. Sev. Loc. Total Cost 8 K 0317 Mamalahoa Hwy. Nani Kupurw PI. 2 0 5 0 2 9 10,000 7 K 0347 Mamalahoa Hwy. old Sen Franklin score 2 0 5 0 1 8 30,000 2 R 0239 Marano Ku Fulani 1 0 4 0 4 9 12,000 2 R 0135 Manors Flora 1 0 5 0 4 10 13,000 2 R 0240 Ohuohu E. Pusirwko Makaala 2 0 5 7 3 17 8,000 2 K 0236 Old Mamalahoe Hwy. Ka"ko Homestead Rd. Kalanianaole Sch, ingress d 2 0 4 0 1 7 15,000 6 R 0273 Paniob Ave. Panbb PI.2 0 3 0 2 7 10,000 6 R 0341 Paniob Ave. Pus Melia Waikoba Rd.2 0 5 7 2 16 45,000 6 R 0255 Panblo Ave. Puu NO 2 0 4 7 2 is 6,000 2 R 0168 Pohakulani W. Kawwani 2 0 2 0 3 7 2,500 2R 0017 Ponahawai Ululani 1 0 5 7 4 17 22,000 2 R 0089 Ululani W. Lonikaula 2 0 2 7 4 15 10,000 2 K 0013 Ululani Wailuku Dr. 1 0 3 0 4 -832,500 Total Estimated Cost for 2003 = $887,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Detailed Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Total Est. Cost for 2004 = $905,000 Page 1 of 2 kKersectioa ID Ped. Bus Desi Sev. Loc. Total Cost 2 R 0006 Mn Leilehua 1 0 1 7 3 12 19,000 2 K 0042 Ahe Puku 1 0 1 7 3 12 10,000 2 K 0113 Aheahe Hems 1 0 1 7 4 13 36,000 2 K 0118 Aheahe Hems IPuka 1 0 1 7 4 13 18,000 2 K 0115 Mum Hama Ipuka 1 0 1 7 4 13 18,000 2 K 0114 Adan IPuka 1 0 1 7 4 13 35,500 2 K 0065 Ainede Dr. Ka Hke 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2 K 0123 Akahi Hems 1 0 1 7 4 13 16,000 2 K 0122 Akahi Hems Wailoa 1 0 1 7 4 13 16,000 2 K 0132 Akekeke Kaumna Dr. 1 0 1 7 3 12 10,000 2 R 0157 Alma PI. Kinoole 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2 R 0225 Alia PI. Alia Kaakepa 1 0 5 7 1 14 4,000 7 R 0349 Alii Dc Kaluma 2 0 3 7 1 13 4,000 2 K 0035 Alu Pukam 1 0 1 7 3 12 34,000 2 R 0174 E. Palai Olu 1 0 1 7 3 12 10,000 2 R 0095 Ekela PI. Ekela Heahea 1 0 1 7 3 12 20,000 2 R 0120 Haiha1 Hoolaulea 1 0 1 7 3 12 13,000 2 R 0009 Haihai Koala 1 0 1 7 3 12 16,000 2 K 0041 Haihai Leilelwa 2 0 1 7 3 13 14,000 2 R 0094 Heahea Hook PI. 1 0 1 7 3 12 10,000 2 R 0096 Heahee Pikili PI. 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2 R 0093 Hash" Walake 1 0 1 7 3 12 91000 2 K 0112 Hems Kupukupu 1 0 1 7 4 13 57,000 2 R 0008 Hookam Kode 1 0 1 7 3 12 21,000 2 K 0043 Hookam Puku 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2 R 0160 FboWla Nou 1 0 1 7 3 12 16,000 2 R 0159 Hoolala Pl. HoolaFa 1 0 1 7 3 12 35,000 2 R 0119 Hoolaulea FloolaUea 1 0 1 7 3 12 13,000 2 K 0064 Hoolaulea Kaulike 1 0 1 7 3 12 19,000 2 K 0063 Hoolaulea Lelapua 1 0 1 7 3 12 20,000 2 R 0034 Hmlelai Parreewa 1 0 1 7 4 13 6,500 2 K 0010 Ikahi Puueo 1 0 3 0 2 6 22,000 2 K 0007 Iliahi Waimku 1 0 4 7 2 14 27,000 6 R 0247 Iwikuaopo Dr. Kekumu Pl. 1 0 3 7 2 13 11,000 2 R 0056 Kahikh Kukuau_ 1 0 1 7 4 13 161000 2 R 0057 Kahikini Laheu 1 0 1 7 4 13 10,000 2 R 0100 Kahikint Ohukea 1 0 1 7 4 13 11,000 2 K 0011 Kama Pu 1 0 3 0 2 6 12,000 2 K 0005 Kauila Waimku 1 0 3 0 2 6 41,000 2 K 0061 Kaulike Lekspue 1 0 1 7 3 12 31,000 2 K 0161 Kaumam Dr. Gilbert Carvalho Park Waianuenue Ave. 1 0 1 7 3 12 18,000 2 K 0134 Kaumana Dr. N. Kvahva S. hvaiwa 1 0 1 7 3 12 3,000 2 R 0107 Kekuanaoa Marwno1 0 1 7 4 13 24,000 2 K 0086 KilaueaAve. Okrna 2 0 6 0 4 12 6,000 2 R 0047 IQMle W. LaNkaula 2 0 1 7 4 14 18,000 2 K 0044 Koele Puku 1 0 1 7 3 12 22,000 2 R 0092 Komoham Mohouli 1 0 1 7 4 13 8,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Yrtersection ID FY 2004 Ped. Bus Dest Sev. Loc. Page 2 of 2 Total cost 2 R 0117 KAamarur PI. Oiham 1 0 1 7 3 12 3,000 2 K 0117 Kupukupu Ikrm Ipuka 1 0 1 7 4 13 16,000 2 K 0062 Lae" Paulele 1 0 1 7 3 12 20 000 2 K 0128 Liko Lehua & WiN Wili 1 0 1 7 3 12 22,000 2 R 0098 N. Adku PI. Nowelo 2 0 2 7 3 14 13,000 2 K 0009 Ohm Puueo 1 0 3 0 2 6 19,000 Total Estimated Cost for 2004 = $906.000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Detailed Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Total Est. Cost for 2005 = $750,500 Page 1 of 2 htersection ID Ped. Bus Dest Sev. Loc. Total Cost 6 R 0339 Aaka PI. Aala Way 1 0 1 7 2 11 500 6 R 0338 Aake PI. Maim 1 0 1 7 2 11 500 6 R 0260 Aalu PI. Laie 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 6 R 0340 Repo PI. Makn1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 7 K 0257 Ahu Kanka 1 0 1 7 2 11 14,000 7 K 0258 Ahu Keawm 1 0 1 7 2 11 12,000 7 K 0256 Ahu Wane 1 0 1 7 2 11 14,000 8 R 0343 Ake Ala Napoopoo Rd. 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 6 R 0257 Akaula Alava Laic 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 6 R 0278 Akaula Hulu 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 6 R 0283 Aka0a Kuaehu PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 6 R 0263 Akaula Law Pohekala PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 6 R 0281 Akoula Puwalu 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 6 R 0282 Akaula Ot, Akoula 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 6 R 0284 Akaula PI. Akaula 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 7 R 0356 Amaama Hidani 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 7 R 0357 Amara Kuakapu 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 8 K 0313 Adan Kdopue PI. Muli 1 0 1 7 2 11 12,000 8 K 0310 Aolani PI. Adam t 0 1 7 2 11 5,000 6 R 0337 Apau PI. Melina 1 0 1 7 2 11 1,000 7 R 0331 E. Kawen PI. Kowen W. Kawen PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 6 R 0248 E. Makuehin Wkuamoo Dr. W. Makuahin 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2 K 0174 Hata Waanuenue Ave. 2 0 4 0 4 10 7,000 7 K 0278 Haawai PI. Kekai 1 0 1 7 2 11 24,000 7 K 0279 Haawai PI. Lako 1 0 1 7 2 11 251000 7 K 0296 Halehau Olorma PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 14,000 6 R 0285 Hakma PI. Halon PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 4 R 0217 Hamakua Oceanview Subdiv, Old Mameahoa Hwy. 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 7 K 0265 Hada Kaheiau 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 7 K 0263 Haoe Kollo 1 0 1 7 2 11 17,000 7 K 0264 Hada Leone 1 0 1 7 2 -1116,000 6 R 0256 Hoohiki Pl. Laie 1 0 1 7 2 11 11,000 2 R 0226 Hoohipa PI. Kaakepa 1 0 1 7 1 10 4,000 6 R 0277 Hoon PI. Hdu 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 6 R 0275 Huta Kimo-Nui 1 0 1 7 2 11 17,000 6 R 0261 Hulu Laie 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 6 R 0279 Hulu Nana PI, 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 6 R 0271 Hulu Paniolo Ave. 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 6 R 0276 Hulukoe PI. Kimo-Nui 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 6 R 0249 Wituamoo Dr. Kupunkan PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 6 R 0250 Wkuamoo Or. Makuakane 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 1 K 0216 Kehekai BIW. Purewai_ 2 0 4 0 1 7 500 2 R 0172 Kahaopea KBau Ave. _ 2 0 5 0 3 10 500 7 K 0282 Kandau Lako 1 0 1 7 2 11 15,000 2 R 0224 Kalika PI. Kama 1 0 1 7 1 10 14,000 7 R 0352 Kamehameha III Rd. Kealii 1 0 -17- 2 11 4,500 _7, K 0260 Kanka _ Kiipahaku 1 0 1 7 2 11 14,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report FY 2005 Page 2 of 2 NNersecfion ID Ped. Bus Desi Soy. Loc. Total cost 2 K 0219 Kaur ana Dr. Kilda Rd. 2 0 4 0 3 9 500 7 K 0298 K,akealani Dr. Papala 1 0 1 7 2 11 10,000 7 R 0293 Kealakaa Man wake 1 0 1 7 3 12 0-0-0 7 R 0310 Kealakehe Laps NO 1 0 1 7 3 12 9,500 7 R 0312 Kealakehe OnOw 1 0 1 7 3 12 4.000 7 K 0262 Kaeloha Koldis 1 0 1 7 2 11 11,000 6 R 0258 Kekoa Pl. Lie 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 7 K 0259 l(lipohaku Wana 1 0 1 7 2 11 7,000 2 K 0091 fGllAve. Kahaopea Puainako2 0 5 0 3 10 1,000 3 R 0244 Koi Lp. Koi Lp. 1 0 1 7 1 10 8,500 3 R 0245 Kai I.P. Kol Lp. 1 0 1 7 1 10 13,000 3 R 0243 Koi LP. Koi Pt 1 0 1 7 1 10 16,500 7 K 0276 Kddia Kuprna 1 0 1 7 2 11 9,000 7 K 0284 Koldia Lako 1 0 1 7 2 11 10,000 7 R 0358 Kuakapu Paiaha 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,500 7 K 0269 KuPuna Lako 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 7 K 0268 Kupura Lako (Private Rd.) 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 6 R 0259 Lela Makanahele PI. NavAN PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 19,000 6 R 0262 Lie Puwalu 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 6 R 0265 Lei, PI. Lela 1 0 1 7 2 11 15,000 7 K 0283 Lako Leone Leone Way 1 0 1 7 2 11 33,000 2 K 0237 Malum PI. Old Marnalahoe Hwy, 2 0 4 0 1 7 500 7 K 0332 Mamalahoa Hwy. Hokoloa Post Office 1 0 6 0 2 9 2,000 7 K 0333 Mamalatm Hwy. Korn Arts Center 2 0 4 0 2 8 4,000 2 K 0036 Pukena PI. Pukana 1 0 1 7 3 12 33,000 2 K 0162 Punawai Waisnuenue Ave. 1 0 1 7 3 12 3,000 6 R 0280 Puwalu Pl. Puaalu 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 7 K 0288 Royal Poll Dr. Plurneria Rd. Royal Poinciana PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 5,000 2K 0175 Waienuenue Ave. Parking lot for Hilo Mee. Center 2 0 5 0 3 10 2,000 2 R 0197 Waianuhm Pl. Waianuhea Way 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 notal Estimated Cost for 2005 = $750,500 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule ADA Final Transition Plan Related to Curb Ramps Alphabetical Breakdown of Detailed Implementation Schedule Detailed Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Total Est. Cost for FY 2000 - 2005 = $5,217,500 Page 1 of 7 kdersection ID Ped. Bus Dest, sev. Loc Total cost FY S R 0339 Aaka PI. Aaka Way 1 0 1 7 2 11 500 2,005 6 R 0338 Asks PI. Maana 1 0 1 7 2 11 500 2,005 6 R 0260 Aalu PI. Laie 10 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 6 R 0340 Alpo PI. Manna 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 2,005 2 R 0006 Ahe Leilehua 1 0 1 7 3 12 19,000 2,004 2 K 0042 Ahe Puku 1 0 1 7 3 12 10,000 2,004 2 K 0113 Aheahe Hema 1 0 1 7 4 13 36,000 2,004 2 K 0118 Aheahe Hevna Ipuka 1 0 1 7 4 13 18,000 2,004 2 K 0119 Aheehe Ipuka 2 0 6 7 4 19 30,000 2,000 7 K 0257 Ahu Kaneka 1 0 1 7 2 11 14,000 2,005 7 K 0258 Ahu Keabhs 1 0 1 7 2 11 12,000 2,005 7 K 0266 Ahu Wana 1 0 1 7 2 11 14,000 2,005 2 K 0115 Aauna Hema Ipuka 1 0 1 7 4 13 18,000 2,004 2 K 0114 Plluna lPuka 1 0 1 7 4 13 35,500 2,004 2 K 0153 Ainako Ave. Laukona 2 0 4 0 3 9 15,000 2,003 2 K 0065 AinaoW Dr. Kaulike 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2,004 8 R 0343 Aka Ala Napoopoo Rd. 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 2,005 2 K 0123 Akahl Hema 1 0 1 7 4 13 16,000 2,004 2 K 0122 Mani Hema Waiba 1 0 1 7 4 13 16,000 2,004 2 K 0105 Akahi Mita 2 0 4 0 4 10 20,000 2,002 6 R 0257 Akaula Agana Lab 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2,005 6 R 0278 Akaula Hulu 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2,005 6 R 0283 Akaula Kuaehu PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 6 R 0263 Akaula Lab Pohakala PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2,005 6 R 0281 Akaula Puwdu 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2,005 6 R 0282 Akaula Ct Akaula 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 o K uzda wceue rn. Akauw 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 2 K 0132 Akekeke Kaumana Dr. 1 0 1 7 3 12 10,000 2,004 2 K 0173 Alae Elepab 2 0 4 0 4 10 5,000 2,002 2 K 0095 Also Lainnana 2 0 5 0 4 11 29,500 2,002 2 R 0157 Alena PI. Kinoole 1 0 1 7 3 12 6,000 2,004 2 R 0225 Alia PI. Me Kaakepa 1 0 S 7 1 14 4,000 2,004 7 K 0301 Ala Dr. AM Sunset Plaza 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 2,002 7 K 0300 AIG Dr. Kahakai Rd. 2 0 5 7 3 17 5,000 2,003 7 K 0318 Alii Dr. Kahikke Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 1,000 2,002 7 R 0349 A8 Dr. Kalurw 2 0 3 7 1 13 4,000 2,004 7 R 0348 AN Dr. Kamehameha III Rd. 2 0 5 7 2 16 12,000 2,003 7 K 0344 All Dr. Keauhw Beach Havel Drvry. 2 0 5 7 2 16 5,000 2,003 7 K 0306 Ala Dr. Llkare Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 7,000 2.002 7 K 0303 Affil Dr. St Michael's Church 2 0 4 0 4 10 10,000 2,003 2 K 0035 Alu Pukana 1 0 1 7 3 12 34,000 2,004 7 R 0356 Amaama HWN 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 7 R 0357 Amaama Kuakapu 1 0 1 7 , 2 11 4,000 2,005 2 K OD08 Annawlu Rd. Ohai Wainaku 1 0 5 0 2 8 50,000 2,003 2 R 0175 Andrews Ave. Kalammnaole Ave. Keokea Lp. 1 0 5 7 3 16 18,000 2,003 8 K 0313 Adan Kdopua PI. Mua 1 0 1 7 2 11 12,000 2.005 8 K 0310 AokaN PI. Adani 1 0 1 7 2 11 5,000 2,005 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Page 2 of 7 kNersection ID Ped. Bus Dest Sev. Loc. Total cost FY 6 R 0337 Apau PI. Malin 1 0 1 7 2 11 1,000 2,005 2 K 0067 ywpuni 191auea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 14,000 2,000 2 R 0079 Aupuni PauaM 2 0 6 7 4 19 17,000 2,000 2 R 0138 Banyan Dr, Iih'rwai 1 0 5 7 4 17 17,000 2,002 2 K 0068 Barenaba Ln. Kilauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 13,000 2,000 2 R 0143 Bayfront Hwy. Kamehameha Ave. 1 0 4 7 4 16 15,000 2,003 2 K 0349 Bayfront parking lot Karnehameha Ave. Pauahi 2 0 4 0 4 10 5,000 2,002 7 K 0326 Dead end Henry 1 0 5 7 4 17 28,000 2,003 7 R 0331 E. Kawena PI, Kawena W. Kawara PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 2 R 0109 E. Lanikaula Laukapu 2 0 5 7 4 18 4,000 2,000 6 R 0248 E. Makuahine Wkuamoo Dr. W. Makuahine 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2,005 2 R 0174 E. Palm Olu 1 0 1 7 3 12 10,000 2,004 2 R 0095 Ekma PI. Ekela Heahea 1 0 1 7 3 12 20,000 2,004 2 K 0101 Elepaio Haifi 1 0 3 7 4 15 30,500 2,003 6 R 0314 Emmalani HJukupuna 1 0 6 0 2 9 17,000 2,003 2 R 0068 Fumeaw Ln. Kamehameha Ave. 2 0 5 0 4 11 18,000 2,002 2 K 0021 Fumeaur Ln. Keawe 2 0 5 7 4 18 49,000 2,000 2 K 0022 Furnea=Ln. Kilauea 2 0 5 0 4 11 7,000 2,002 2 R 0069 Fumeaur Ln. Punhoa 2 0 5 7 4 18 21,000 2,000 2 R 0120 Haihai Hoobulea 1 0 1 7 3 12 13,000 2,004 2 R 0009 Haihai Koele 1 0 1 7 3 12 16,000 2,004 2 K 0041 Haihai LeiI&M 2 0 1 7 3 13 14,000 2,004 2 K 0097 Haiti Kamakahonu 2 0 4 0 4 10 36,000 2,002 2 K 0001 Haili Kamehammu Ave. 2 0 2 7 4 15 20,000 2,003 2 R 0067 Haili Kamehameha Ave. 2 0 5 0 4 11 84,000 2,002 2 K 0135 Haili Kapiolani 2 0 4 7 4 17 53,000 2,002 2 K 0002 Haifi Kaawe 2 0 5 7 4 18 73,000 2,000 2 R 0002 Haifi Kilauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 4,000 2,000 2 K 0017 Haili Kinoole 2 0 5 7 4 18 66,500 2,000 2 R 0021 Haili Ululani 2 0 4 7 4 17 62,500 2,002 2 K 0174 Halal Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 4 0 4 10 7,000 2,005 7 K 0278 Halawai PI. Kekai 1 0 1 7 2 11 24,000 2,005 7 K 0279 Hmarai PK. Lesko 1 0 1 7 2 11 25,000 2,005 7 K 0296 Habhau Olorriea PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 14,000 2,005 8 K 0342 WAR Mamalahoa Hwy. 2 0 5 7 2 16 5,000 2,003 6 R 0285 Habra PI. Habra PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 4 R 0217 Hamakua Ocemwiew Subdiv. Old Mamalahoa Hwy. 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 2,005 7 K 0322 Hanma PI. K iakini Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 2,002 7 K 0265 Haoa Kaheiau 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 7 K 0263 Haoa K04olia 1 0 1 7 2 11 17,000 2,005 7 K 0264 Haoa Leona 1 0 1 7 2 11 15,000 2,005 2 R 0094 Heahea Hodlo PI. 1 0 1 7 3 12 10,000 2,004 2 R 0096 Heahea Pikil PI. 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2,004 2 R 0093 Heahea Walake 1 0 1 7 3 12 9,000 2,004 2 K 0112 Hema Kupula" 1 0 1 7 4 13 57,000 2,004 7 K 0324 Henry Krmk" Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 10,000 2,002 7 K 0325 Henry Shopping Center 2 0 5 7 4 18 6,000 2,002 7 K 0345 Henry WaInx,rt D -Y. 2 0 5 7 4 18 8,000 2,002 2 K 0060 HOW Kilauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 22,000 2,000 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Page 3 of 7 Mersection ID Ped. Bus Dest Sev. Loc. Total cost FY 2 R 0038 Hoku Kirwoa 2 0 5 7 4 18 15,000 2,000 2 K 0120 Holamalia Ipuka 2 0 4 0 4 10 15,000 2,002 2 K 0137 Hanelani Ln. Kapiolani 2 0 4 0 4 10 28,500 2,002 5 R 0359 Ho,o akau Rd. Agriculwre Bldg. 2 0 4 0 2 8 15,000 2,003 5 R 0360 Horamakau Rd. Akoni Pule Hwy. 2 0 4 0 2 8 15,000 2,003 6 R 0256 Hoohiki PI. Laie 1 0 1 7 2 11 11,000 2,005 2 R 0226 Hoohipa PI. Kaakepa 1 0 1 7 1 10 4,000 2,005 2 R 0008 Hookano Koele 1 0 1 7 3 12 21,000 2,004 2 K 0043 Hookano Puku 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2,004 6 R 0253 Hooko Wkuarnoo Dr. 2 0 4 7 2 15 12,000 2,002 6 R 0254 Hooko Wkuamoo Dr. Panido Ave. 2 0 4 7 2 15 8,000 2,003 6 R 0270 Hooko Panido 2 0 4 7 2 15 28,000 2,003 2 R 0160 Hoopla Nou 1 0 1 7 3 12 16,000 2,004 2 R 0159 Hodala PL Hooaa 1 0 1 7 3 12 35,000 2,004 2 R 0119 Hoolaulea Hodaulea 1 0 1 7 3 12 13,000 2,004 2 K 0064 Hodaulea Kaulike 1 0 1 7 3 12 19,000 2,004 2 K 0063 Hooaulea Lelepua 1 0 1 7 3 12 20,000 2,004 6 R 0277 Hoorn PI. Hutu 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 2,005 2 K 0092 Huaaai Kapidani 2 0 6 7 4 19 22,000 2,000 2 K 0059 Huaaai Kiauce Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 12,000 2,000 2 R 0037 Huaaai Kinoole 2 0 5 7 4 18 55,500 2,000 2 R 0036 Hualalai Mann Kea 1 0 5 7 4 17 2,000 2,002 2 R 0035 Hualalai Mauna Loa2 0 5 7 4 18 6,000 2,000 2 R 0034 Hualalai Parnewe 1 0 1 7 4 13 6,500 2,004 2 K 0103 Hualalai Uluani 2 0 6 7 4 19 12,000 2,000 7 K 0320 Hualalai Rd. Kuakini Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 53,000 2,001 2 K 0250 Huapaa Ln. Kilauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 4,000 2,000 6 R 0275 Hulu Kimo-Nui 1 0 1 7 2 11 17,000 2,005 6 R 0261 Hut .Laie 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 6 R 0279 Hulu Nanala PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2,005 6 R 0271 Hulu Paniob Ave. 1 0 1 7 2 11 6,000 2,005 6 R 0276 Hulukoa PI. IQm Nui 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 2 K 0010 ILaN Puueo 1 0 3 0 2 6 22,000 2,004 2 K 0007 Ilahi Waimku 1 0 4 7 2 14 27.000 2.004 2 K 0108 Ipuka Kapiolmi Waive 2 0 4 7 4 17 33,500 2,001 2 R 0014 Irwin Uluani 1 0 2 0 4 7 12,000 2,003 6 R 0247 Wkuamoo Dr. Kekumu PI. 1 0 3 7 2 13 11,000 2,004 6 R 0249 Wkuamoo Dr. Kupunakane PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,000 2,005 6 R 0250 Wlcuamoo Dr. Makuakane 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2,005 7 K 0319 Kaahumanu PI. Paleni Rd. 2 0 5 7 4 18 500 2,002 1 K 0228 Kahakai Bbd. Keonepoko Elam. Sch. entrance 2 0 4 7 1 14 5,000 2,003 1 K 0229 Kahakai Bbd. Keornpoko Elem. Sch. ent 2 0 4 7 1 14 5,000 2,003 1 K 0216 Kahakai Bbd. Pun i 2 0 4 0 1 7 500 2,005 2 R 0172 Kahaopea Mauea Ave. 2 0 5 0 3 10 500 2,005 7 K 0282 Kaheau Lako 1 0 1 7 2 11 15,000 2,005 2 R 0056 Kahikini Kukuau 1 0 1 7 4 13 16,000 2,004 2 R 0057 Kahitni Lahou 1 0 1 7 4 13 10,000 2,004 2 R 0100 Kahikini Ohukea 1 0 1 7 4 13 11,000 2,004 2 K 0102 Kaivani Waanuenue Ave. 2 0 4 7 4 17 20,000 2,002 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Page 4 of 7 Intersection ID Ped. Bus Dest. Sev. Loc. Total Cost FY 7 K 0331 Kzw Kwkird Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 10,000 2,002 2 R 0064 Kalakow Kamehameha Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 39,500 2,000 2 K 0003 Kalakaw Keswe 2 0 5 7 4 18 36 000 2 onn 2 K 0016 Kalakaw Kirwole 2 0 4 7 4 17 45,000 2,001 7 K 0321 Kalani Kwkini Hwy. 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 2,002 2 R 0136 Kalanikoa Kuawa 2 0 6 7 4 19 23,000 2,000 10 8 R 0347 Kamakani Mamalahoa Hwy. 1 0 6 7 2 16 7,000 2,003 2 K 0074 Kaman Kilauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 39,000 2,000 2 R 0045 Kaman Kinoole 2 2 0 5 7 4 18 21,000 2,000 2 R 0075 Kamehameha Ave. Mateo 2 0 5 7 4 18 29,000 2,000 2 R 0072 Kamehameha Ave. Nawahi Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 12,000 2,000 2 R 0151 Kamehemeha Ave. Pawhi 2 0 5 7 4 18 26,000 2,000 2 R 0076 Kamehameha Ave. Pauahi Ponhawai 2 0 4 7 4 17 4,000 2,002 2 R 0071 Kamehameha Ave. Ponahawsi 2 0 5 7 4 18 25,000 2,000 2 R 0065 Kamehameha Ave. Shipman 2 0 5 7 4 18 6,000 2,000 2 R 0066 Kamehameha Ave. Waianuenue Ave. 1 0 5 7 4 17 51,500 2,002 7 R 0352 Kamehameha III Rd. Kealn 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,500 2,005 7 R 0351 Kamehemeha III Rd. Keauhou Shopping Center entrance (Priv 2 0 5 7 2 16 4,000 2,003 7 K 0260 Kanka Kiipchaku 0 1 0 1 7 2 11 14,000 2,005 2 K 0011 Kanoa Puwo 1 1 0 3 0 2 6 12.000 2.004 1 K 0207 Koohe Hmstd. Rd. Pahoa School Gym 2 0 4 0 2 8 20,000 2.003 2 K 0139 Kapdsni Homel@ni Mohala PI. 2 0 4 0 4 10 19,000 2,002 2 K 0121 Kapiolani Kukwu 1 0 3 7 4 15 16,000 2,001 2 K 0136 Kapiolani Mohala PI. 2 0 4 0 4 10 14,500 2,002 2 K 0105 Kapiolani Mohouli 2 0 4 0 4 10 10,000 2,002 2 R 0106 Kapiolani Pcnahewai 2 0 5 0 4 11 23,000 2,002 2 R 0090 Kapiolani W. Kawtli 2 0 4 7 4 17 5,000 2,002 2 R D091 Kapiolani W. Lanikada 2 0 4 7 4 17 5,000 2,002 2 K 0138 Kapidaru Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 4 7 4 17 23,500 2,002 2 K 0005 Kauila Wainku 1 0 3 0 2 6 41,000 2,004 2 K D061 Kaulike Lelepua 1 0 1 7 3 12 31,000 2,004 2 K 0161 Kaumana Dr. Gilbert Carvalho Park Waianuenue Ave. 1 0 1 7 3 12 18,000 2,004 2 K 0219 Kaumana Dr. Kilua Rd. 2 0 4 0 3 9 500 2,005 2 K 0160 Kaumana Dr. Lale Waianuenue Ave.1 0 4 7 3 1s 12,000 2,003 2 K-6134 Kauman Dr. N. M.Wa S. Maiwa 1 0 1 7 3 12 3,000 2,004 2 K 0131 Kaumana Dr. N. Wiri WHi S. Wdi Wi4 2 0 5 7 3 17 4,000 2,002 2 R 0173 Kawailani Klaues Ave. 1 0 4 7 3 1s 19,000 2,003 2 K 0087 Kawifi Kilame Ave. 2 0 6 7 4 19 27,000 2,000 7 K 0298 Keakealani Dr. Papal@ 1 0 1 7 2 11 10,000 2,005 7 R 0304 Kealakaa Kunakani 2 0 4 0 3 9 15,000 2,003 7 R 0293 Keal@kaa Manaaalea 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2,005 7 R 0310 Kealakehe Laps Nui 1 0 1 7 3 12 9,500 2,005 7 R 0312 Keal@kehe Onipa21 0 1 7 3 12 4,000 2,005 7 K 0262 Kealoha Koldia 1 0 1 7 2 11 11,000 2,005 2 K 0020 Keawe Mateo 2 0 5 7 4 18 51,500 2,001 2 R 0003 Keswe Shipman 1 0 5 7 4 17 78,000 2,001 2 K 0039 Keawe Wal@nuenue Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 54,000 2,001 2 R 0241 Keawe Waianuenue Ave. Parking lot 1 0 6 0 4 11 4,000 2,002 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Page 5 of 7 MMerseetion ID 1 Ped. Bus Desi Sev. Loc. Total Cost FY 2 K 0040 Keaws Wailuku Dr. 2 0 5 7 4 18 37,000 2,001 8 K 0316 Kee Kee Mamalahoa Hwy. 2 0 5 7 2 16 5,000 2,003 2 R 0005 Kekaulike Shipman 2 0 6 7 4 19 241000 21000 2 K 0054 Kekaulike Waiaru ue Ave. 2 0 6 7 4 19 29,500 2,000 2 R 0004 Kekaulike Wailuku Dr.. 2 0 6 7 4 19 10,000 2,000 6 R 0258 Kekoa PI. laic 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 2 K 0072 Kekuanaoe Klauea Ave. 2 0 5 7 4 18 27,000 2,001 2 R 0107 Kekuanaoa Manono 1 0 1 7 4 13 24,000 2,004 7 K 0259 Kipohaku Wana 1 0 1 7 2 11 7,000 2,005 2 R 0020 Kilauea Ave. Asia Ln. Kukuau 2 0 4 7 4 17 9,000 2,002 2 K 0069 Kilauea Ave. Barenaba Ln. Maile 2 0 4 7 4 17 12,000 2,002 2 K 0091 Kilauea Ave. Kahaopea Puainako 2 0 5 0 3 10 1.000 2005. 2 K 0083 Kilauea Ave. Kohola 1 0 5 7 4 17 6,000 2,002 2 K 0057 Kilauea Ave. Kukuau 2 0 5 7 4 18 41,000 2,001 2 K 0073 Kilauea Ave. Lanihuli 2 0 2 0 4 8 5,000 2,003 2 K 0088 Kilauea Ave. Leihala Dr. 2 0 2 7 4 15 1,000 2,003 2 K 0084 Kilauea Ave. Lara 2 0 4 7 4 17 26,000 2,002 2 K 0019 Kilauea Ave. Marro 2 0 5 7 4 18 50,000 2,001 2 K 0071 Klauea Ave. Mahwh 2 0 6 7 4 19 14,000 2,000 2 K 0086 Kilauea Ave. Olona 2 0 6 0 4 12 6,000 2,004 2 K 0251 Kilauea Ave. oeorio Ln. 2 0 5 7 4 18 8,000 2,001 2 K 0058 Kilauea Ave. Pauahi 2 0 5 7 4 18 28,000 2,001 2 K 0056 1ilauea Ave. Ponahawai 2 0 5 7 4 18 40,500 2,001 2 K 0085 Kibuea Ave. W. Lanikaula 2 0 6 7 4 19 16,000 2,000 2 K 0066 Wlauea Ave. Wileon 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 2,001 6 R 0335 Kmolm Mamalahoa Hwy. 1 0 5 7 3 16 12,000 2,003 2 R 0238 PIr o E. Kawailani E. Palai 2 0 4 7 3 16 6,500 2,003 2 R 0019 Kirwob Kukuau 2 0 5 7 4 18 38,000 2,001 2 R 0044 IGnook+ Lanihuli 2 0 6 7 4 19 19,000 2,000 2 R 0046 Kmooie Lino 2 0 5 7 4 18 23,000 2,001 2 K 0018 Kinoole Mamo 2 0 5 7 4 18 73,000 2,001 2 R 0040 IGnoob Molwuli 2 0 4 7 4 17 29,000 2,002 2 R 0048 Kuwde Obna 2 0 4 7 4 17 9,000 2,003 2 R 0016 Kkwole Pwrehawai1 0 6 7 4 18 64,000 2.001 W. Kawailani 2 R 0088 Kawole W. Kawili 2 0 5 7 4 18 19,000 2,001 2 R 0047 Kmoob W. Lanikaula 2 0 1 7 4 14 18,000 2,004 2 K 0015 Kxwde Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 6 7 4 19 19,000 2,000 2 R 0039 Knode Walks 2 0 5 7 4 18 20,000 2,001 2 R 0013 Kmoola WaLku Dr. 1 0 6 0 4 11 10,000 2,002 2 K 0044 Keele Puku 1 0 1 7 3 12 22,000 2,004 3 R 0244 Kd Lp. Kai Lp. 1 0 1 7 1 10 8,500 2,005 3 R 0245 Kni LP. Koi Lp. 1 0 1 7 1 10 13,000 2,005 3 R 0243 Koi Lp. Koi PI. 1 0 1 -71 10 16,500 2,005 7 K 0276 KoWia Kupuna 1 0 1 7 2 11 9,000 2,005 7 K 0284 Kolo6a Lako 1 0 1 7 2 11 10,000 2,005 2 R 0092 Komolwa Molwuli 1 0 1 7 4 13 8,000 2,004 2 K 0170 Konahana Punahele 2 0 6 0 4 12 25,000 2,002 2 K 0099 Korn& a Puuhonu PI. 2 0 5 7 4 18 17,000 2,001 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report Page 6 of 7 hitersecfion ID Ped. Bus Dest. Sev. Loc. Total Cost FY 8 K 0340 Knnewaem School Rd. Mamalahoa Hwy. 2 0 4 7 2 15 3,000 2,003 7 R 0358 Kuakapu Paieha 1 0 1 7 2 11 4,500 2,005 7 K 0328 Kuakini Hwy. Ukana Ln. 2 0 5 1 4 18 5,000 2,002 7 K 0353 Kuakini Hwy. Likana Ln. parking lot 2 0 5 1 4 18 5,000 2,002 7 K 0346 Kuakini Hwy. Ukam Ln. Parking lot 2 0 5 7 4 18 5,000 2,002 7 K 0329 KwIdN Hwy. Palani Rd. 2 0 5 1 4 18 12,000 2,002 2 R 0137 Kawa Mareno 1 0 4 7 4 16 10,000 2,003 2 R 0150 K wu Kumukoe 1 0 3 0 4 8 10,000 2,003 2 K 0124 Kukmu Ululani 2 0 5 0 4 11 13,000 2,002 2 R 0242 KulaW Rd. Mamalahoa Hwy. 2 0 4 0 1 7 15,000 2,003 2 R 0117 Kulamanu Pl. Oihana 1 0 1 7 3 12 3,000 2,004 2 K 0117 KL"kupu Hems Ipuka 1 0 1 7 4 13 16,000 2,004 7 K 0269 Kupwa Lako 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 7 K 0268 Kupum Lako (Private Rd.) 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 6 R 0259 Laie Makanahele PI. Nawili PI. 1 0 1 7 2 it 19,000 2,005 6 R 0262 Laie Puwalu 1 0 1 7 2 11 16,000 2,005 6 R 0265 Laie PI. Late 1 0 1 7 2 11 15,000 2,005 2 K 0096 Leimam Waiami wAve. 2 0 4 7 4 17 10,000 2,003 7 K 0283 Lako Leone Loom Way 1 0 1 7 2 11 33,000 2,005 2 R 0105 Larxhuli Lei 2 0 5 0 4 11 15,000 2,002 2 K 0006 Lehua Wainaku 2 0 4 0 2 8 35,000 2,003 2 R 0104 Lei Mohouli 1 0 4 7 4 16 34,000 2,003 2 K 0062 Lelelow PaLdele 1 0 1 7 3 12 20,000 2,004 2 R 0140 Uhiwai Lihiwai 1 0 5 7 4 17 9,000 2,003 2 K 0128 Liko Lehw S. Will VYdi 1 0 1 7 3 12 22,000 2,004 2 R 0015 Liiuokalan Pcnahawai 1 0 5 0 4 10 15,000 2,002 6 R 0333 Lindsey Rd. Mamalahm Hwy. 1 0 5 7 3 16 40,000 2,003 6 R 0269 Lua Kula Melia 1 0 5 0 2 8 8,000 2,003 6 R 0274 Lw Kula Parniolo Ave. 2 0 5 0 2 9 16,000 2,003 2 K 0237 Malum PL Okt Mamalahoa Hwy. 2 0 4 0 1 7 500 2,005 7 K 0348 Mamalahoa Hwy. Aloha Theatre 2 0 5 0 1 8 5,000 2,003 7 K 0334 Mamalahoa Hwy. Hohraloa Elem. School 2 0 4 0 2 8 19,000 2,003 7 K 0332 Mamalahoa Hwy. HolwW Post Office 1 0 6 0 2 9 2,000 2,005 8 R 0346 Mamalahca Hwy. Kilda Rd. Koa 1 0 5 0 2 8 15,000 2,003 7 K 0333 Mamalahm Hwy. Kona Arts Center 2 0 4 0 2 8 4,000 2,005 8 K 0317 Mamalahoa Hwy. Nani Kupum Pl. 2 0 5 0 2 9 10,000 2,003 7 K 0347 Mamalahoa Hwy. Old Ben Franklin Store 2 0 5 0 1 8 30,000 2,003 2 R 0074 Mane Punahm 2 0 5 7 4 18 73,000 2,001 2 R 0239 Manse Kuava Piilani 1 0 d n A o i � nnn , nm 2 R 0135 Marere Pinard 1 0 5 0 4 10 13,000 2,003 2 R 0103 Mohouk Kilauea Ave. Lei 2 0 4 7 4 17 8,000 2,002 2 R 0098 N. Achuku PI. Nowelo 2 0 2 7 3 14 13,000 2,004 2 K 0009 Ohai Puueo 1 0 3 0 2 6 19,000 2,004 2 R 0240 Ohuohu E. Puaimko Makaala 2 0 5 7 3 17 8,000 2,003 2 K 0236 Old Mamalahoa Hwy. Kaapoko Homestead Rd. Kalznhnaole S 2 0 4 0 1 7 15,000 2,003 1 K 0234 Old Vdcam Rd. KeaairPahoa Rd. Milo 2 0 4 7 2 15 5,500 2,001 6 R 0273 Paniolo Ave. Paniolo PI. 2 0 3 0 2 7 10,000 2,003 6 R 0341 Paniolo Ave. Pus Melia Waikoloa Rd. 2 0 5 7 2 16 45,000 2,003 6 R 0255 Paniolo Ave. Pw NO 2 0 4 7 2 15 6,000 2,003 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Pian Implementation Schedule Priority Cost Report 2 0 Page 7 of 7 kftrsecfion 10 Ped. Bus Dest Sev. Loc. Total cost FY 2 R 0168 Pohakulani W. Kawailani 2 0 2 0 3 7 2,500 2,003 2 R 0070 Ponahavai Punahoa 2 0 5 0 4 11 - 16,000 2,002 2 R 0017 Ponahawai Ululani 1 0 5 7 4 17 22,000 2,003 6 R 0342 Pua Melia Waikoloa Rd. 1 0 6 1 2 16 14,000 2,001 2 K 0036 Pukana PI. Pukana 1 0 1 1 3 12 33,000 2,005 2 K 0162 Punawai Waianuenue Ave. 1 0 1 7 3 12 3,000 2,005 6 R 0280 Puwalu PI. Puwalu 1 0 1 7 2 11 8,000 2,005 7 K 0288 Royal Poinciana Dr. Plumeria Rd. Royal Poinciana PI. 1 0 1 7 2 11 5,000 2,005 2 R 0089 Ululeni W. Larnkaula 2 0 2 7 4 15 10,000 2,003 2 K 0055 Ululary Waianuenue Ave. 2 0 6 7 4 19 21,500 2,000 2 K 0104 Ululani Waiba 2 0 4 7 4 17 11,000 2,001 2 K 0013 Ukdani Wailuku Dr. 1 0 3 0 4 8 32,500 2,003 2 K 0245 Waianuenue Ave. Hilo High Sch. entrance Hilo Int Sch. Exit 5 0 4 7 4 20 18,000 2,000 2 K 0246 Waianuenue Ave. Hilo High Sch. e)dt Hilo Int Sch, entrance 5 0 4 7 4 20 9,000 2,000 2 K 0175 Waiarweriw Ave. Parking lot for Hilo Med. Center 2 0 5 0 3 10 2,000 2,005 2 R 0197 Waianuhea Pl. Walanuhea Way 1 0 1 7 3 12 8,000 2,005 Total Estimated Cost for FY 2000 - 2005 = $5,217,500 ADA Curb Ramp Transition Plan Implementation Schedule M