Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 1091.110 2012-2014Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 QC4--9-%0 r rI,-.)�I u.l : ;,s'L. CyiKO.• C. :IJ AI'� 1A 1; -014 OFC 16 53 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Aa,f'- (,A Cr-"-�Ze Le- � ( Comm. N to �. Ref. To: Ref. Date The attached letter was submitted by 714 individuals, as listed. In addition, 60 letters were submitted by unknown individuals, for a total of 774 letters. Mariner Revell Zachary Atagi Bruce M. Minn Ryan Dawson Kaya Dane Sakai Brentley Garrett Jarred I.H. Kawachi Jordan Takaaze Paica Young Amber Dawson-Kaya Richard Mellott Joleliah Rush Tom Clearwater Keean Desa Matthew Makao Harrison Clark Nina Gutmanis Heather Rapoza Tim Curtis Louis Bauguess Rebekah Durden Jena Correira Theresa Burian Rebekah Wingerd Wei Chih Chen Charles Tuttle Lionel Carvalho Naoyuki Kondo Shane Ragsdale Mitchell Ruggles Derek Watson Sandra Nagata Kevin Shymansky Jerrold Smart Jay Takaaze Mileh Chishel Zion Timshel Larry Nagata Dennis Nakano Bryson Franco Nancy Heipl Rhonda Mattos Deva Bolt Aaron Taniguchi Adam Weishaupt Mike Condel'o Chris Igawa-Silva Justin Ramos Keith K. Ha`o Thea Hanato-Smith Ashley Mattos Jason Savella Jennafer Mancini John Byrd, Sr. Shane Ikeda Amanda Bush Kawika Pinu Deborah L. Cabral Vanessa Agliam Marcus Chogbraci Rylan Malakawa Deborah Tuttle Ruben Gonzales Lois Yamada Loren DeMello A. Melesko Shakeisha Angay-Pihi Anissa C.K. Nortwood Marreah Bohol Corin Killisan Dana Goya Rachel Elderts Shawna Moore William H. Martinez -Herring Pepe Moore Bruce Nagata Greg Haglin Lei Leach Brad Yamasaki Michelle Juaquin Dane Nogar Richard Cordeiro Yoshiaki Suzuki Dustin Sakoda Amanda Zion Amy B. Cody Charles Gordon Andrew Storach Alyssa Hill Daniel H. Schattauer Joshua Sottak-Zapinig Jeremy Wigdortz Matson Anyum Gresyn Victor Aza Sayre Meghann Chow Helani E. Kenui Travis Stafford Meri McPherson Richard Chang Angela Tayamen Kristen M. Murota Robert Inouye Dennis Nishimura Ina Hielscher Matt Yamauchi Stephen Estillore Heather G. Orah Derek Shiroma Dale Ackaws Charisse M. Vigneau Isaac Goya Justy Kahanu Lorilynn Rapoza Chawn Kaili Corwin Compton Stone Tabajunda Ikaika Kaili Wendell Ing August Lins Chase Desa Creel Snider James A. Wilson Nicole Minato Adam Cruse David Uweo Chelsea Cabison Paul Lee Dahlben Jonah K. Iona Peggy Takaaze William Buercado Larry Hartland Total on this page: 132 S£i :a�?ud siuj uo pjoj UBLIS uoslzago-d auuV LIsIL'M PILMH poomzapun upup-1 snOoW jjagiltJ ugj!.IJ ims otuisjug t?tls-eS ianuvgBvW xDT4dojsptjD zauTljL I spno-1 OZOI"D paL'uaan ggoo dIPLld SOUJL-1.i01ad uOt puD anblu%X uaN373JDZ) I 33UP-1 iuppLu-eN Xpu10 u>?XL'pg •-1 X113d upir J •V snso f IIIH XMIJ, ogtuoD aplso-1 leuatlpV 11Il31l3I4,PN 011102I L"LI ojp5unH XJOD iuujuN pu-e mIumN pul?la-1 ue11u3 l;DgIIJ OvijuolaW Int'd pnsjfl j;)LldojSIj D MH *e1IL'W izowifnd jjooS ouissuv� II1g ii-ausmw X.iNPf Ouipuag xuoLlluV poomiapun pleun.i j nli1l^i XgTUD jowuavo uaildaIS 11103111-1 uouaan XUN z020ZI XObAO-1 uogdojS-mz)gjjuW .zapiaJ-A 'V t'saaaZ ueuzsul L uLlo f umoag l3jxj, IntloN aa1I73M ug31_lrJ MIS poom.zapun f a.irezuN �x;)Jd puloS Innd jg21UN aliol,1 nietlnuumrN ursug pumd vp-eW biliieD •V uoaaLuzD opa101 LUXLgs P.IXU 1a.10meW ut?LIaaLIS uinl-1 u-etuN31H PJL'u31x run1euD Ia1N nfsurd L,ig-e.m,S ildasof 21pue1 'W gw-es LISPAN 011W .ianalD iaUu31W POOH uss1IaIN JOi3;)JDO W WAS 0211-eg uL'IXQ smaapuV JJa f uosj;)wL f goon f soi�I assaf i�podsoH tau3�2i zf `nuV 'f pognH vulaJu73S JOISON ouilnb'd auuolQ una ailaN iurtutX uojjV xIoQ L'IILw UOIIL'Q •V BIDA saamod p1nLIQ -if ajoa Inp-d Luu1iIjAY If `g1W oukeAk 031113n 111320-1 oiajupl-I N aulLusuf 30ILA •N uapuL21 zouijrW z1n-1 vVII0.11H 01112119 sIng Xu -d p2w-1 vIai?uV sLL11ogl Immisu f OMd 110"KIS iuvinjnraH 31.'g nuiLln-1 unL11a-1 nvign-1 znt1ia-1 iLl3n21uv j IlooS xz)LI31-I uuLlo f CIaatlgnu-d,o ouojS uapiezg aN-ef oBn-ed lejgoCl XLls.zad nimioS uosingmd LI5nH xo3N31H sutuotll coling uilsnf a3b'.z0 alo3iN x03lprn Vu11B1Q 31nQ snio-1 uo1.10 Pala 'x ONON zallaA dao f 13111W auXtM s.I;)Nv X.IOD Ias11LilS 331u-ef epwjuS upsna sguimunj OpejD pzumpa-1 xo?l uoss.iad �1101 LI3sIaorJ utlo f oXnouel Ia1urCI XIS •A� aalad sipllnoon0 •N •g alpof uosIIAY MAL'a redox aanlulW uoszapuV Prgj JZ)IOOQ umujg purldmoD IjuD uOJPPAA allatlz)'W Pixg gLI.TLw uOSIJ L'H .iagLuV JOzail-M XPu10 LI31?ag 1naX out?D 101[) ainnsILW uouXo(j opidso-d IrN aami?V mos0 uooA oXgI i .1371113n JUIN uid31JJ .ILl5 .irenD3CI LpuLLuV uosduuoL1 j ivalaH uosdwiS XputN PJBPPorJ-ptvW ,W tum-vnH sasow uOILIsV uosdLuiS uos11V Kendra Bailey Nathan Swink Garrett Hughes Richard Baltazar Asia Adams Sandra C. Winter Kimberly T. Coyle Gerald Paguian Joshua Winchester Kalan Patacsol Robert Fujino Nakulu`aipukonakona Kupahu Wm F. Bewnelt Gabriel Kelly Haneen Elayyan Geri Johneston Jeremiah Augustine Kaulana Keaunui Darien Rowley G. Maree Irving Gail Fabrizio Keilah Buehler Craig Nakao Gage London Marcus Roberson Jared McManus Brock Erickson Fely Federico Ramos Gregory Nichols Marlene Myers Samantha Smith Louis K. Collins III Catherine K. Castro Michelle H. Bush Shivonne Kahee Maria Javellana Keahi Benn Dasha Epstein Jason Pila Alex Jarman E. Gamuet Randall Aquino Jr. Mark Shearadt J -Lynn Lander Michelle Johnston Torin McMurray Martha Wade Roger Ventura Robert Berry Dominic Oliveira Wendy Y. Baier Marcie Grover Maile Nihipali Jason Stearman Dianna Wilcox Mica Newberry Kainalu Grace Taylor Rasmussen Dennis Walsh Joseph W. Westphal Regina VanZandt Michele Cantere Randall Naihe John Wooldadyn Fred Lord Kristy Nishihara Ariana Durr Shellie Alcos Chelsea Brown Jennifer Rovetch Gloria Chichew Sam Grobstein Tiare McCandless Guy Alan Cleary Rowan Maylani Kaheiki Chris Olcott Chris Lee Gerod Dost Erbin Gamurot Richard Peterson Dustin DeCairey Sarah M. Andes Deana Ke Susan Chesley Jeff E. Hunt Thad Estrada Edith Birdwell Leo Mayer Tyler Brown Nicole J. Kelley Erila Osborne Adam Ameen Stan Scott Malia Wentworth -Smith Misty M. Lum Won Zayshalynn Desha Aralea Faris Danone Shaffer Daynelle Lee Kaimi Dyreson Clinton Kono Guy Lee Josh Turner Jennifer Santiago Karin Sullivan Heather Wilkinson Jhon Villacorte Liloa Perreira Kamoku Shawna Hiatt Chace Cheek Kathleen J. Sonner Kamalu Seman Michelle N. Naihe Carol Groves Ronald Flower Gwen Sanchis Joseph Davis Jennifer Vance Stan -Lee L. E. Nii Courtney Bellie Thomas Missick Kirk lchishita Burter Rosewood Michael Gill Kiana Hohon Chad Kelly Anne Brown Michael Matealei Surian Creary Sherry K. Ah Nee Kylie Inman Lovey Silva Bruce Blyth Sean Llanes Rosendo Figueroa Debbie Boggs Total Count on this Page: 138 Jesis Elohim Dennis Carlson R. Joseph Hedberg Thomas S. Hall Nicole Mudra Lori A. Swaney Ayla Rocafort Tracy Broussard M.K. Greene Terri Ann Quinn Ocean Whitman Rosalind Hoke David Hepp Da Ryll Martin Panzer Krasinski Robert Carter Tisha Montoya Danny Rios Julie Tilden Esther M. Kuhupua Pual L. Pirer Hari Ram Digeronimo Sllie Raymond Alyssa S. Kline Byron Peckham Barbara Brown Arjuna Lozano Trista Napeahi Nichole Furies Shiloh Robinson Charles Sanchez Young Myung Cho Oscar Kenney Monique Rudolph Gabriel Hawelu Augustine Eisenbrandt Danielle McDowell Kevin B. Patterson Tasha Bissell Eileen Long Abbie Corbett Beverly B. Jackson Uriel Espinoza R. Linne Annalani Tuia Stephen Barton Charles Steffes James Stallard Donnalynn Balai Hanalei Benn Jane Warner Chris Rodrigues Rosalie Figueroa Chanise Pea Antonio Le -Tasha Davis M. Kehaulani Carrillo -Rodrigues Deja M. Vial Larry Lundy Lisa Labrador Charles William Lucas H.D. Bailey Farah Uwai Josephine Keau Keely Williams David McMurren Quincy Boggs Timothy G. Dolan Scott Guthrie Anthony Adams Laval Rosaga Forrest Roberts Lance W. Kaawaloa Angela L. Kaawaloa Troy Stevens Arif McCluer Dona Mueller James V. Johns Abrajean Silva William Caldwell Lynn K. Elia Betty Ann Torres Brianne Yockeman Marcello P. Marchesini Yandah M. Mary Brinkley Parker K. Godwin Olicia L. Kuheana Naika P. Laszlo Gyore Heather Wood Laura Adams -Durgin Carole Wilbur Beto Balderas Freddy Freddy Paul Lostanran Nicole Doctor Clinton Bannister Jerome Slade Sione Taufa James Tsusi BJ Johnson Adam Johnson Beth Hoggard Steven Wesolowski Patrick Epstein Donna Enos Blair Vinson Rodney K. Keaweeha Sandra Mariano Analu Berman Noah Chong Natajha Rein Ricky Alaniz Richard Kane Marie -Chantal Carpentier K. Havonnie Tory DeSomer Ken Grogan Bobbi Grogan Larry Smith Devin Tripp Wendy Westlake Margaret Aicaina Jesse Ferguson Lisa B. Herbert Wayne Wilkinson Gemma Buell Maile Gonsalves Keahi Schweitzer -Treat Gail A. Fabrizio Rodney K. Keaweehu- Kaehuaea Amy Williams Geary Krueger Elizabeth Tichenor Carrie Somero Leialoha K. Jones Anvsuya Shapley Total Count on this Page: 138 Alihandro Ganiron John Calapit Michael Wirgau Sr. Adam Fenenbock Dorothy M. Joseph Michael Ambrose Gerald Pitiol Shane Kaui Bailey Parkhurst George H. Snider Marcia L. McBrayer Beth Carpenter Alan Gonsalves Tracy L. Gonsalves Shantelle Serrao Brittany Lewis Robert Black Carol Wilt Michael Morrissey Thor Brisson Amber Wyne Terrah Brott Jacklyn Diaz Soren Wills Michael Rzepecki Andrew Pino Prentiss W. Drew Sims David G. Humphries Christopher Robinson Cheyene Kahauolopua Mat Chavaries Justin Crusat Rodney K. Keaweehu Sarah Ann E. Keaweehu Karnava Keaweehu Kaehuaea Veronica Williams Shauna Valente Linda Grotkin Reina M. Kanaka`ole Cody Mercado Simona Teixeira Dylan Clay Rachel Real Jennifer Real Candace Hutaff Justin Kalawaia Kapena C. Riveira Sr. Tiara -Lyn Tanaka Uilani Colon Hunter Kealoha Caleb Kahele Keanalu Chartrand Cody Lindsey Michael Atkins Rudy Diaz Sadie Evagelista Caleb M. Pacheco Lewin J. K. Chartrand, Jr. Abe Van Meter Keana Tomori Alyssa Hatada Ryan S. Domingo Ola Purdy Jonathan Rossetti Tiani Rubon Keani Kapeliera-Bannister Matthew Kaho`ohanohano Hanoa Pua`a-Freitas Jordan Lavea Anthony Canenas David Murray Mele`ana Adams Frogy Seth Howell Lacy Purdy Kamahoi Cookman Kaleo Williams Shane Feeney Michael Ellsworth Goldie Hannon Annelise D. Carol U. Ashley Mikkola Chris Spears Lenneth M. Pavao III Ty Chamberlain Brooke Tani William Pacatang Richard Kaiawe Alicia Armitage Lacee Drake Mae Feeney Mike Kabes Casey Harlan Regan Watkins Ty Bade Jared Thurkins Alexis Hoapili Sheldon Acantilado Jack K. Hao Julie Adams Bryant Anthony Legaspi Denise R. Chaples Aracelli Movairty Brandon Gurat Joel C. Mika Gellardo Hannah Seaton Jerry Gallerdo, Jr. Jonah Kahiapo Sonny Puerto Jr. Chioke Kauhane Malia Walker Molly Griffitt Cloud McCan Paul E. Abiley Jeremy Kalima Dennis Feliciano Eli Simpson Kemueli Simpson Jowell Guerreiro Kai`anui Andaya Eric Keisler Terry Ward Gregory Otake Ka`eo Hunter Todd A. Hurt Salvador Luquin Leina Iliwaulanu Robert Hakala Michael Gibson Kenneth Smith Eric Brady John Telismar Kristine Wilcox William Keiki Michael Nunes Total Count on this Page: 13 8 David A. Roberce Mihaly Imre Lucy K. Melocco Ken Long Mary Keisler Max K. S. Mattos Gyndlin A. Oshiro Brittany Eggen Arthur W. Rosario Jr. Keala Rosario Solomon Keohohina Leayla Keohohina Thomas Ane Stacey Rushlow Michael H. Wilson Rudy Paculloa Steve Swall Jeremy Varize Morgan Rae Taylor Rose McKnight Cameron Cacciacarue Sharon Pacheco Gina Moreno Ophelia Kennealy Steven Brightbill Arber Falows Betty A. Torres Puanani Freitas John -Jon Freitas Patricia Zygutis Karen S. Picadura James Garnett Alex Baranov Terri Kua Kelly Dylan Total Count on this Page: 33 r l'? 1� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 7014 01:1 16 91 6: I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.M Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /qct ( � D � q6q- -7066 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 201q DEC 16 AM 8: 53 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wkNw.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, El.-� L./ -N- 22) Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 BEC 16 141 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v xN,,N.casaa.orc Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Jww� -r b -11(k .,.k, Ka N ao-,>b -3yu CO U'`_'� ,t cot), V Dear Hawaii County Council: 7 0 1 Q GEC 16 AM D. 54 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs x\wx,�.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, n U sj ,i ; i • '. Dear Hawaii County Council: 2gig DEC 16 AN & s4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<,, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, %J/� � c 2 C C CCU`�T`,• Cl - f --f K CCS' .- A"I' ll Dear Hawaii County Council: 2TT [TC 16 AM S: 54 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w k� w.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, oemrvk SUN C L -AV tL 1 ,,'•' Dear Hawaii County Council: S 6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2Q`� SEC I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w\Nw.casaa.or,� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 14114 0 1/fe-r/�5 557-- 7r 9 k ftAZ49VjA JM 90 V44A ���V---- -&417 Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigsasati ur�� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. U Sincerely, �P.etii� ��rrii 0L:ci T ; CLE;:K !1'`v ;•ems , Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 291q DEC 16 M 8- 54 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigsI_�,a Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �� � � ���� Com-• 5�-ems l / oc C to,./ Dear Hawaii County Council: 0LJ 16 M Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 , Ec D- 54 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigsN .k::r, its �,��� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �k�r, P, ctX-Y ut t/�;}�1 r � a � � r• i r ,� Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 M 8- S4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ZQl'! I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ti,l� �� �_��> >�l.r>�~r Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, crc k \dafsoin alb -(00- tql f'` f r/ rti ll Dear Hawaii County Council: 2p arc 16 R3 87* 54 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs «_,•,y y�xa a �_on� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ` Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 Am 8 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 i IR `C : 55 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs -Cad Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C �V t EP v:. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 201u gEC 1 fi 55 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigss-c_is_at(,t tib Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, &I L,97in tTL- A- t A C-7:�) r Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs «N \k \� .casaa.or,-,, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 nCOU'Iii' ` C' -Li C i � o l- v'' 1. .�i -V A "! ✓� i as .at 2914 DEC 16 M, Ct 55 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ._. � _� r�a'I"-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, T Dear Hawaii County Council: 55 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs %o ,,t Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ►L�-1� IZ . �`o r � Dear Hawaii County Council: 87 55 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ., c_ �taa_ur�U Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, SAviU0 cpm Dear Hawaii County Council: b 55 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs , , .c �, t. ;}r� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r^ n SL4h e IkCJa S �� i► e Yh a►. _ c 0 h, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 SS I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs °,\ _k,,,is�� ..�>� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 6Aylcle ©� L< (AD ra- � Ov� 0 ��uo��a� �(. i I I0 �67�� Ulu Dear Hawaii County Council: r 6 '55 gp,i._C i Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs , „\\ .pati si.��r�- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely ,-. K�-IiC4q MLAIC( C1 y Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 Ali 8: 5 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs . � ,, -\,c< > B .E � Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, iol-,) yqmak\ �f� W Dear Hawaii County Council: 55 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs y :. Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (ti!'ll�st. iw Dear Hawaii County Council: ZDI�! Bic t n 91 ID S Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v�_vvvN.casaa.or., Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (A � , t , U)' i,, i1;� 7. Dear Hawaii County Council: MC 16 M 55 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs „y yy �y .casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 5 n 5 kd wv v f XV\ CA'J'� �. °� �` N\`�1-\ k CC) fy� Dear Hawaii County Council: r!� u"ia i 55 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v, \, k�-casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, # t t5 J Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 91 87 55 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, //' Dear Hawaii County Council: Z�C 16 AN 55 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs x.casaa.on, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, c �� �� rG r4./2( 0 � Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vy.casaa.or- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. 1 Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council:'�C' 6C6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs �ti .casaa.or() Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, v.� Dear Hawaii County Council: pl;r 16 AM 87 56 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs : . � Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 3' GEC 16 0- C-54 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs t :. � 1'�! Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 6-7 /',(fi YC- 146 �3kw i velZEIC�k0v Coo- _ti 0 t� �� �•. .e'.»moi � Dear Hawaii County Council:: 56 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs r> Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 14 e- � ct v.. � C, - 16 e- K " , -- Dear Hawaii County Council: I? -C 16 All B-56 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs,— Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article ~was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C01; Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ?_V 9't; 16 AN Ski I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs «,1 L'. �Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, gbnc ,T -,O oO I E- qo% - qr)�- ao5 niarr�€S Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ,!,i Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely,, LTi Yom'' Auc,t+ tso� g9�-�zo Dear Hawaii County Council: , � � 16 kli & 56 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ty - -� N�.casaa.urg Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 702-312,5A 5r Dear Hawaii County Council: ,•; , ; Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 20114 arIc 16 M 8-' gb I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v_�v yv .casaawro Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, "-gW-72-7 i Dear Hawaii County Council: S P,� 6: 5,6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vy �� v� .casaa.olg Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 95�, 46 '%'� IT J ✓ A! n Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs xNA- -w.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincere y, '' - -41-Ss 1 i V Dear Hawaii County Council: �„ r '.0 6 5 � Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs yy y�ti\ .casaa.or,) Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, t-� � 41 1..�"` G [4-o5 �-- b E S X Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 8-57 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \ANN x\.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, K�Pi lel' Yl�liv �0� @lid cc1M Dear Hawaii County Council: t'�l on-' Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 7�<<l nrC 16 57 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, M% �" S1404 Cit clSe Gbi Soi� cue Seclydec�.c @%(AL �a M Dear Hawaii County Council: r 0!11. 16 A Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2- 91tI `� M g' 57 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs � 1, s Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. �� V", /� = M40 INUMEN "11 L C� t41 Dear Hawaii County Council: 20�'! t 6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 DEC /JI a- 57 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigsu' Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �( r /S tt � Ott Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 57 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v, .. ,.� C,[ a.0 Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 05— �� - �� G ko<-> - L3 4,, Dear Hawaii County Council: f Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs r\ .casaa.oro Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vti_ y y,.cas�ta.oi� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ` S Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2 ' ?-U b � 9 J I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs r , r Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, K� , 0 PE 5 A rA! Dear Hawaii County Council: 16'y1 57 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couo.ty Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, tf..111 11� S Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302?R,Ii7 16 r cu >% I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or5z Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, F U, 6%X Iv .1) Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 20','; Orr 16 P1 8: S? I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on trutb, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w-v,,-w.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, m� Te T heyeso, �u a Abu Y-iCk-1 h �U (0 uv!�, 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: r 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs '•y `„` L!t1” t.��F- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, -,/ nt, ts• '1, n - r ,f "A i Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 r. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \ori N�_c:asaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in pylic places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this U yt r''G •i • 1 C ; t r- Dear Hawaii County Council: A,V,1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 rt€ air • = __C 16 Ki 8' S I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \_\ .casaa.oi- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, S 40 DK N ph(1. p1A Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, E�� ,-�Py7P0<Aa-Z-e I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \t ti\ �\ _casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I_AK�Y M/-(, At6 fP%' J5 -J52g2 Dear Hawaii County Council: /ju! 1 6 ki? 8' 57 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \t ti\ �\ _casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I_AK�Y M/-(, At6 fP%' J5 -J52g2 FF K. Dear Hawaii County Council: �` 1 ". Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 k` c: 5? I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, NSW �G11,1 `0q - `- 59 --17 q � .v CO Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 71! T -7C i 6 AVI [ ,] I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs _fin, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, a pe -a rI I q h l: ti..r _ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I U 1,11, U 57 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs _\� .casa< k)ELI Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Ckrls 13avio, - S', Iy[A owe, 5(Q�j.atj i . Lt,11V% - 2 1 9. Dear Hawaii County Council: b Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs , s= Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, walrtab- Smch Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs l IA = z Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, coli ....t:.r,,t{ Dear Hawaii County Council: 7%idi or --C 16 Ali 8: 5 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs yx. "_\.0 as�t�Z.�)-r,0 Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (X� vf,-7� NM (h)(1& 1�uS h Dear Hawaii County Council: �� ''' t ` `-'7 I - i 6 �.�i i o• �i ✓ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �i'�`1 � C- I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs yy _casaa.ong Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 'COY` fel' • { [ C -VV N Q0 2�- e?3- 16%-S7 Dear Hawaii County Council: 7011, nor b 57 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Nv_" ev_casaaot-L, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, con �92% 4� Dear Hawaii County Council: rice 16 AN 8: 57 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs �,N xN wxasaa.org' Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, f r� Lorcn Da, t ilo I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ; Dear Hawaii County Council: 7. E�� y�F•'r 6 r Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ; A . Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ` I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs 4 Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ,V,ZU At7� A— � c6 I(I.- (A`-13 Dear Hawaii County Council: a Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs 4 , s, o 1 _ Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Since ely, _ \^-I \,V � V V\ --r- �.- \ (J \(X C, Ncv\-� C � , ( t Dear Hawaii County Council: ��t„ r��r ► b ffli 53 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \% ti\ �\ .casaa.on-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, bolf-` ss -7i) I C c ! r: ... _. %4* Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 � ' r ' t 6 Al".6: 58 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Ll.� -r�-I, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely �� I � ` r� l iv�1 Nk,U\1e- 06(xgo�f\ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs,,,,,-,,,,,- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, iJ� AAVA, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ` 9—PC 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 301 the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members axe not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wwvw.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ,I!, o h3ii 8- 53 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since th .-n Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, NIJ14AM14k, i�� Ir sQc�m nne ri nR Dear Hawaii County Council: ��` v= ! 6 ��4 �: (Z` Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: it 11 nrP b Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w-wv.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public. places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 6r �? /a* zn l 1 Z?j7 f" •.. Dear Hawaii County Council: 4G 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with my bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not at! restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ba -i at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in publi,. places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, s Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in publ c places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 7 rlcr 16 $: 53 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wAvw.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed pito law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consi(:eration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ^ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: tr 16 AN 8* su Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ww,v.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no r sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the 13111 302 I am writing to express my op,�,)sition for proposed Bill 302 whiclo.would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public 1 aces, beaches, and parks. As with .cny bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth; facts, and real evidence. Mr. Karr;�.ia has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hanct. vapor is harmful to others. Why 1s the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bi.?_l 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since tL ,a Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why h; ,.s bill 302 not been amended? AN,!,at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more p(:•)ple testifying in opposition of Biit 302 than for it. Many of the council members a.;°e not fully educated on Ecigs. The, following web site contains good information and research _gin ecigs www.casaa.org Former co.mcil member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to (- tie brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not al' restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your Jecision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has sy ated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't t`1-1 original kntunt of the smoking ba,) at parks and beaches to rim., the area of littering from cigarete butts? Ecigs do not leave behin:'. butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes TV) sense to ban ecigs at parks and b.-oches. The health of many ecig users is ir. jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed :',-.,.o law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bi"Ll 302 based on science not hysteri:L, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which rebs me of my liberties, and my fre- dom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public; places. Thank you for your consic,-ration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ► 6 r+, ; 53 Lo. Subject: Please Oppose the BRJ 302 I am writing to express my opp+rsition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with ,.ny bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth., facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kaw tha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting dor Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why iias bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more pf:ople testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated orr-Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ww�v.casaa.org Former co -incil member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your Jecision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't & w original intent of the smoking batt at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no, sense to ban ecigs at parks and be ,aches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accompL 5hments of former smokers that ha ie used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on 13/11302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which ribs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ()JQCL1J-1V\. &tnPL�' 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: 201*1' 7C 16 M '.- 51c3 Subject: Please Oppose the Bili: 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 whict, would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanoha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hangvapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear; hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting `or Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bit 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since tbr.;n Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs A,-,ANN,,.casaa.org Former casncil member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not al restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your lecision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't tk e original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes ro sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed ir-to law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accompli,,hments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bi11302 based on science not hyster:z., facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which rebs me of my liberties, and my fre• lom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consics�ration of my position on this irr-iportant issue. Sincerely, �c 6� 1� G .i Cc t2 a Dear Hawaii County Council: 4M„ r r t�!� Subject: Please Oppose the 13):'4 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 whic`.k would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public p(acws, beaches, and parks. As with 'Jiy bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth; facts, and real evidence. Mr. Karr Jia has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hanc vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear;, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting -`'or Bill 302, the majority of the Ha,Aaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since t: -.,-,n Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why h..,,s bill 302 not been amended? Alsc, at recent public hearings on BiJ 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bil: 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. Th.,. following web site contains good information and research -)n ecigs www.casaa.org Former cc-mcil member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to ,, ne brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not '.l restaurants will give you food poi ,ming. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of c: gigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't tEe original intent of the smoking bar. at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette' butts? Ecigs do not leave behir butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users i c, in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed i-ito law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accompli-.hments of former smokers that ha ;,e used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Pl,,ase base your decision on &111 -3 02 based on science not hyster; i, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which rebs me of my liberties, and my free -.'Om to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consic' -ration of my position on this important issue. Silcerely, C' �+ r� ! Dear Hawaii County Council: 5$ Subject: Please Oppose the Bial 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 whicri would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with =aly bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kam dia has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand. vapor is harmful to others. Why is ihe Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on feats hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting Ebr Bill 302, the majority of the Hsi ,vaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bi _i. 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since fl- m Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why h•ts bill 302 not been amended? Alsc�, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more peop'e testifying in opposition of Bil' 302 than for it. M,my of the council members yae not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former co,mcil member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to ene brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all. restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecs.gs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't tree original intent of the smoking baa-, at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behinc: butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and be?.ches. The health of many ecig users i,- in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accompli,hments of former smokers that ha: re used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteric,; facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which rebs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in publi places. Thank you for your consir :ration of my position on this important issue. , Sincerely, s Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bid 302 2f V ITS 16 R 8: J 8 I am writing to express my oppa')sition for proposed Bill 302 which; would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with ^5my bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why i:, the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear; hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting %or Bill 302, the majority of the Hai vaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend BEI 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since t}~.�:n Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? A1se, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more p( opie testifying in opposition of Bit 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. Th:. following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of er' i gs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking bars at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarete butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes nu sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users i:; in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed !YIto law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that ha:� used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Phase base your decision on BIII 302 based on science not hyster .), facts not fear. I strongly urge ycu to oppose Bill 302 which i -obs me of my liberties, and my fre 'lom to choose a healthier alternative to smokipg in publ, (.- places. Thank you for your consiu eration of my position on this important issue. p( ldi Dn V tom' A Dear Hawaii County Council: F Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 f1:` I am writing to express my oppc;sition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public paces, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth. facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kani.iha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand. vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear.' hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting `or Bill 302, the majority of the Ha -vaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend B.'11 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since th:,n Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why ',;as bill 302 not been amended? Als+ at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more p- 3ple testifying in opposition of Bil. 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. Tl: following web site contains good information and research on ecigs NN,N-v.casaa.org Former ccTiacil member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to ! ue brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poi: oning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Fuxthermore Mr. Kanuha has s` ).ted he wants to make the use of e, igs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking bin at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigare�te butts? Ecigs do not leave behin(,. butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes n,,, sense to ban ecigs at parks and bciches. The health of many ecig users in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed ittio law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accompl;,,hments of former smokers that he. e used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on E ti )02 base' on science not hysteri ?, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my frel!)om to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consi gyration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: 4011i nrCt 6 tM 2- g Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orp- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �Y (At O W t M : V) v) _l .` 1 L) 61 6cY1 t. (+,- 0 +. cc U, Dear Hawaii County Council:16 2n►�, ' C• 5 9 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, y� M UY Dear Hawaii County Council: 73„i t"irC 16 N1 8: 5 9 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, p i , Dear Hawaii County Council: LL t1A6 c _. . Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 4il!o ry c r 16 IN & 59 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: � 70! " C x b Al S: 59 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, s Dear Hawaii County Council: 70! 11 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, L r Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 Crerr 6 8 �9 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, K'Re.petcOhl \1 L UT-)- �l.�l�'l4STzv"C� Dear Hawaii County Council: 6`: 59 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /1Z ��"Fl �6C `1�f7 - E G r�. iK Y Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Mr'+c he uq1!fs ?jZ%s I.� Pc�umc� PL 1�6P1 0IGrN I -(IV 9�Zv Dear Hawaii County Council: ?.1�i11rr j b AM�9 Z. . r 1 _l. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, •r%iG� -�.� rt � ►ti.i-( w• �--�-� `'j I ?mob ��,-jwtQ r l . r_,c-� ./%� Dear Hawaii County Council: TKI DEC 16 IN 6' 59 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (-" 0 t::,k �� Cv a,,6tiIA 1'-14 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: C 16 l Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, L Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r Dear Hawaii County Council: TT; C 6 AM a• y,0 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, --J-.b.41A-.- Q.VV% -s C.., d* �� \. •� `t l�-I 5 (�E?Ut^stiG,y-lli� `jrc.rah..o��uh.�;.e.�v Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, l(P l Vy i D2I (-,,C? t14 - 411 Q ; W N,,7, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �°-O r 1266 N5 755 6 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ww,v.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: PO Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 'A Dear Hawaii County Council: Y~ r C 16 0.1 111)' 00 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, -A , HC, I,,- �- �� , r�w, .. 4 4 a � fvC Z Nc l Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ' = u 1 A �O I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oFormer council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, A A . V Dear Hawaii County Council: T1 71r 46 iii 9: GO Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ,, .1 i rC �? ; " ,t - ��. Dear Hawaii County Council: �1 Z �� b huh o; (Q r: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, a 3 �2 I Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, • v k Dear Hawaii County Council: DEC 16 1.l9 9: C0 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w-vvw.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 i� i G' :C t b �'�► 00 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, q,�6 -m Z(2 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 62-/ Y Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 62-/ Y Dear Hawaii County Council: 0 r-�JSV !co Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, all, fc- ttzq Le e --r N cps gok 13 c'3 4--a'-z &� 4P Dear Hawaii County Council: 0 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.M Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: "'„'i r_C 16 V Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or,- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, S i� } '"b a St S2 (?r, teat Iv Ni gU-1LKJ Dear Hawaii County Council: 2��' 7 -r .16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, V -Ni LkAto La haw k, 4)01 1 t Dear Hawaii County Council: Kf 'l C7-11' 16 ku i ©• 00 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, *m KKg0NtA&vVII Ddu ti Dear Hawaii County Council: 71"i r17" 6 fk�R1 g: I)0 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. r� r Sincerely, rr � l NA � ;Q �S �� � _ co Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? _ At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r Dear Hawaii County Council: y Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ` I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, t-?(27ztl� L •'�' ,5 r f'1' 1 , � ' i 4 1 � Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ?71" G 1,11 9. 01 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (4z 114:N/)J �. I,0: Dear Hawaii County Council: 7vi nrc 16 111 9: 01 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: �r� 4 6 1,1 o. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C r t Dear Hawaii County Council: 0 9. 01 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, y" W��c�n��e�. ��� Hr 9672,C Dear Hawaii County Council: 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or-g Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ,sJ ak-c�G� Dear Hawaii County Council:TTI„ l�r `�� �: l� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2VI DEr 16 hid of: C, 1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, i i� i Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ter►,� 20!4 DEC 15 M 9: 01 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, t 5 V-1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 C Cry (' T 1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 211!1; nor 16 lu1 g. 011 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: NVII DEC 16 A3 9: 01 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 270111 UFC, 116 P1 9: 02 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or.2 Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r r FA Al 7 IN 0, 4. NNI E l �' i•'t ...�1� {I'` {�-�- Ids Dear Hawaii County Council: -A 9= (32 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �^ c t1;3O�7 \k -NA Ve�...) �k,- ( Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �`I L `3► =r ' b { 0: 02 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: n r 16 111 g: 02 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, CHASSIPy 14 L--6 Cn1Cr--L lb I &+/,,% ppg �E Biu, 1-� r q 6 -/u0 Dear Hawaii County Council:ni 0, 02 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orp- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: _ 20 �'_�' ! G tir 9: 02 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr, Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 170MMir, ''� ^R -ter Phuu � _ A*o R�-U�< 4409 Dear Hawaii County Council: n -r 1, b tln q. 02 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 `r I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w-vvw.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2n,,, nor 16 VI 9: (}� I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 11T.- IA/, vl-l.-'i Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, W 617 0 1: � - 1 �- 7 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 C�( '! 1 -I -i0 i -s/ Z1"! grr 1 G Au 9: 02 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 2 04\ PN t ON (10s� -loo - �8� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 70! �P.-� 16 P! Q: 02 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: `Y�l DEC 16 LN 0: 02 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, � �^ � G ✓ 6aeley�- 4 L;U ,-�, Dear Hawaii County Council: �'^ TT . SEC 16 111 9. 02 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, gf�- L -t 0 -3 3 if S Dear Hawaii County Council: ► q. �2 •gin:,s n� ! b ��i . Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (� ( - C 63, 9 ct, T6781 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 FIT nor 16 AIII 0. 113 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �uve( Ko"k--- `p o Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 t-.3 c -s Lam I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of .�.. electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter' at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficieRt scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Councic considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, •,(`,fit',- 1' "��i Dear Hawaii County Council: ., nrLs � � 1" . 9: 03 Subject: Please Oppose the 11111302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 7'" C 16 P1 9. 03 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, `VQqk-�r S7-1 ;t, Dear Hawaii County Council: p # G rJ -r i �!� n:=3 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, uV&IAja, -M4,✓ 1*4u0 T4 ,,, , �II Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 UC 16 t i 9: 0 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, y _ f Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, nr !i iAI! Dear Hawaii County Council: 201-9 DEC 16 PAII 9: 03 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 12 - ,t.FI Dear Hawaii County Council: ,,. r t; �. �0: a !' -C 1 b M r 3 Subject: Please Oppose the BUI 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: i ,, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 0�e) FI) -7 0 hubirv1—e in If Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: P7 C 16 e; Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.gm Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: G, 03 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �).Q - o . O<Q� t 9 P mr2 r t_ U. i C,- frj Dear Hawaii County Council:\,� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 1 ?'ilii SL}^ g A., �: �3 6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r .� Dear Hawaii County Council: /A, sA 251.`. �r� t � ��; 9: t7 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ►� c �y'7 -- 832-- 3��� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, V 1kA / _. i Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 Li. !!. -.wJ 16 / - 04 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Nk"1111"A'Vall r I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council:41 0.;{� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 0. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1�(a/N/AJP_� Kv1VVI 3�15-6K7�( Dear Hawaii County Council: V4Q' ,- Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, A-t4�� 7 a"Y1 -2-0 S M w, . L-ao- X,6 ��, ` 9(��2 `i t<,S - 1. 1.5 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: (, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 3 b b LEH,�N -31- z o o `3 `d 5 (O Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 16 04 c• 114 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, [A (� I stn -4 -('o -)kms_ C�,Z-,1 J U!i c f Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ��"' r� ! b f` !� I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r 7aN s Dear Hawaii County Council: 70! 1� i1,r!, 16 PIN 9: C 4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I')l , ,�. ^ �.. p -- � r! •�i Dear Hawaii County Council: ,,p-1 frr t 6 Jai 9: 0' k1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Ll Q J l V 3-s -1 '511,91 1� s Dear Hawaii County Council: p?!'! R7r i o All 9: 1,4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oro Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, M JX, )A ;* 'S%S- °%C,6`% Dear Hawaii County Council: n -G 16 21 9: 134 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, b� )(doo - SA. � 1 cs %(n Zo '�6'60 1-737 Ct 'r Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 'r�;!' �'~� {�t} I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 'D565 t j &,1,d e. S•tmet «. k c ��" 1 t., `l zo C� 3 C� -Wyss 6 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 3bo LCA aA sr VILo Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1-4, I a 9 L:7 a -a �LC6-C6-13 0 r - r i Dear Hawaii County Council: 2 s!I ` ' f 16 tA 9: f'4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I-( j-".- 9 �, -) 20 C ,i Dear Hawaii County Council: I".. �`rC 16 Rf1 o: 0A Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, LO V i% M' -.r,+ INcz Z L L I t E i-{ A S'T-, i Lo , NA `12-0 935 -1 b5o ' 11 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Lc" ,01 (11 (—Z -) (/VV Dear Hawaii County Council: '`F - 6 M. O': 44 2: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I Dear Hawaii County Council: ^n i nr ! 6 4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 3�ITAJ,F R, �felfn 1, +"P,5ah CUwc4, n -�f Dear Hawaii County Council: �.rAtil 10: 04 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www,casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, t�?\ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ��� <StstC-k'o Dear Hawaii County Council: 9. 0;5 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, nevi B6,0-(-,V-N Zvi bch&@ ah on. Co w, Dear Hawaii County Council: wtr .-P , M1 o• OS Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: n Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, IA Imo,NI T 4 7 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 21,17 P"T 16 LI c,, 05 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /ty ivO It tLs(-I Dear Hawaii County Council: iil1 g: 07 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, CT i( (sss P! ,- ,` i1 Dear Hawaii County Council: 1. 17 6 i'll i • V Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, � I ►a � � F� ` AD - (1-0) . Dear Hawaii County Council: n 7 r 6 M 1 c; ``,, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, T�/ klleZ i1 nc, l S Y*% y; Dear Hawaii County Council: i.._.?'1° ��� 5- , 16 Ali 9. 07 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or.2 Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 01 lkyi Kb- L , Lx)x U , 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: , 6 All 9: 07 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii, County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or(1 Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �V\o VV\ 06 �� V\/\CVAk e5V L i �A i q Q -Tl -,b 1 \ t ten{ 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: ^nt ; ESC 16 All 9: C7 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, av Dear Hawaii County Council: r C 16 p, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 t1i c: 137 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, kcu� Fe Pro c 14) als�� Dear Hawaii County Council:�. o7 v p; 107 . J Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r w Y � 1 YOhQ, Dear Hawaii County Council: :i� Q,� n -r 16 ,. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, c Dear Hawaii County Council: (n o� 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 'A 1 j�,L u, to- pct6 OV 4 r�- r Dear Hawaii County Council:7-,� - U M1 9:137 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I A 00�� H T - Dear Hawaii County Council: ;}!,t 0�r 6 111 e; 10,,% Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, F--.fvml� r Ra 9,10 Dear Hawaii County Council:�i �, 9. 07 A, n r Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, V,AOU&Cti P,-,, C 1W,", � , "Y", Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real, evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v-vww.casaa.orL) Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C L e Dear Hawaii County Council:MEE, 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<( Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, i r- Dear Hawaii County Council: t'�' Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ?�tf n -r 16 hl! p; 07 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \v" NNv.casaa.or- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article froim 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecus do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, F's, ice. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ! `�' fr_� �'� �� �'� I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do no't leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council:�_- .. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 w v " !.16 71 a; 07 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vvww.casaa.or� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I�3zcr C, ipuai u�hq S� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ruj =' U i u i� �; 07 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oru Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 f !'i 16 11 n. 0 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orFormer council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid 17 the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ft 1 7' ' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying i►1 opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<g Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, b) c�-W.Q- r V -,e k,.j I- L Dear Hawaii County Council: G IN 9- LIS Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs �,vww.casaq,oEg Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research fi-om an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 fhich robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ��z'�.s� � • � r�c�e� C c, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (/ "- � (/E P AUDI✓ Z1A1'CC4) S-09 X137— 2 (- 7 e) Dear Hawaii County Council:god v- Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.M Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to' one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, J, --/ t, lti r i I C, i -7�—` 1-79 6vqot S�. q(c7g0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �'''- �: 03 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \vww.casaa.orFormer council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, IFF Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Gk 54Aar ar-no Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 i " PrC 16 till A' 033 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oru Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, hicu k� 0 1 t-011av�l lam; obi i �C/ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 7m pg 16 111 9. 1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence`? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more peopletestifyingin opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ort( Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /� hr S� o� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaaM Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: rn l; 6 111 9; 0Q Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, , t L3iL�4�v¢--7 7 2,6 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or(,, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 11100 , me, 0 R. M mm; W, M�!,= 1 r Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 C ?a'i (' C 4 G ��1 g� !;4 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w\vw.casaa.or(-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: .09 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, JLJ4AL/LA;(�o�-. Aq,1E Ro i7�2tSv'1 T0 3 o 32'0 /, 55- K�eau6u !-i g673q Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �1f '` i F�... •..i h'ii flrC 16 Al or 09 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.glIg Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1+11lQ J�,;W ICM, di Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ,�e�- � is ♦ 9 5 r�,ti' 14 ti'' o! -{'0b 111 . 09 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ww,,w.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 C t. �' rr�'t'; v.. EAll . 011 n�C 16 Pill O. 09 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill -302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, W v� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 nor 6 fli 9, 09 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not filly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v- vvw.casaa.or(-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important Issue. Sincerely, 0 e.,. —, 1a, C !.Lt, t Dear Hawaii County Council: _�;! ^FC 16 P11 9: 019 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ww\v.casaa.or(-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, R N.. fH,-3�-Vs Awam()APL Wda..lmlT oa �f Cpl �3� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 4 art r� r b M 9: 09 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v ww.casaa.or�g, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, aR� 41nc�Ccsod) Dear Hawaii County Council: u.., ,J .r 1 V AN i 10)J Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Nvww.casa, .o Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, f a0XIA, .��1� �X Cacou� tags Dear Hawaii County Council: frp 16 "M 9. 09 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \v-,vw.casaa.or�-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ./f C-0 3/r-3,#)2- Dear Hawaii County Council: "=11' 46 1.i 9: 10 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v-vww.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, '77- 5-35 Pall Ik "LA-- k0'V )q Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs %vww.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an Micle from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. 1 strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs-rt parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, &l /v . i /../ M Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1p.!ii i""r ! u 1,11 n: 10 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wwwaa .cas.or�� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you Ifood poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, lo, 0o (e 6r� C-1f� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orFormer council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I41 f�l CICA6 14uqu P or,((600J D/v,CTifAf<Ifi&-J y/1/,/,5, ,. ez?M Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 r,f.. ,'7 TV! 57C 16 AS 9: 10 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, JA /�Ct I'a d e, Lf y 7L Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or« Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerel IJP, Koo.g [--'1 q C7/-1 0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2T " 07.r 16 ".J1 9: 10 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v- ww.casaa.or<( Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, SQ LIVF.Gor^ �&00$g5 -1103 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 EW, t.t .� ('"r I c "r pt 0 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \vww.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, i 1° tf 'i Rt':1r Dear Hawaii County Council: art'= n4 r 16 Pi 9: 10 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oru Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the lise of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the s poking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, &1613 L11,12 A&til, nom- �..c (duo) Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ...� 1. i Ci i _r E 6t� I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or(-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your• consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /Z 4r^ UCvtCt-- GA4^& i'v2.CG,-- Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �✓l �.�t, tit. iit� Ind'! P71 I, 10 A!1 9. 10 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.M Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 '01,; i" ' 9: 10 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \\Av\\.casaa.orL, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 `.F, ' -� � � I I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmfiil to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bili 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on eel "S www.casaa.orQ Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article fi-om 2009. This article was pertaininc, to one brand of ecigs from China. not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of eci-s to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering f=rom cigarette butts? EciLs do not leave behind butts as ci�(arettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban eci,-,s at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties. and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely. Wt -E Iz 6 0 Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 2`1 7• � t Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic ciprettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear_ hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meetinO for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigrs \\xvw asaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article fi-om 2009. This article was pertaining, to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoninl�. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ec]Ls do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smokin�� tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties. and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thant: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely. t��'.V Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 16 Ar, 9: 11 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth. facts. and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmfiil to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article fi-om 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of eeigs from China. not all ecigs are equal. as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence \'our decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecus to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban eci,s at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit s11-10king tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties. and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking( in public places. Thant: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerelv. -70I--7 7 yymM03 kV) "') -% 4W 4 Verba k -e W IG -7 570 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's Nvishes. «thy has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research fi-om an article fi-om 2009. This article \\as pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China. not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smokino ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking, tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly tinge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smokinuill public places. Thant: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely. y67y0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 lin! I, }'r R. +,tv i -•,,� }� V � 9= i ! I am writing to express illy opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic ci-arettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth. facts. and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302_ the majority of the Hawaii County C0 lllCiI originally asked Mr. Kanulla to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information andresearch on ecigs ������.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertainingto one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal. as not all restaurants willgive you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of litterino from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit S1110klll1_1 tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of illy liberties, and illy freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smol:inp in public. places. Thant: you for )row- consideration of my position on tills important issue. Sincerely. r,ZeSy-LSe� .s�ics Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 giT '! .0 16 h1 9: 11 I am writing= to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains \good information and research on ecigs www.easaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research fi•om an article fom 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand ofecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will (T*VC you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the Current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit Sru0kin�g tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely. ')670 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express illy opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at ]land has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering, a bill based on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302.. the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. KallUha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's \vishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fishy educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains flood information and research on ecigs ���wW.casaa.orFF Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence vour decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering frons cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban eci��s at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit sn-loking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerelv, 9'3 C vt `•r 4> lf! Dear Hawaii Cotulty Council: Subject: Please Oppose the 13111 302 ' C 16 AN 9' 11 lam writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w�� w.casaa.or g Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smokin<g in public places. Thank eou for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely. ` 0�13ja ory Zoe% Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 71, I o 1" i 91 i I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Nvwxv.casaa.or<o Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs, leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �V ht�W w04r.CpM Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 „ r I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second ]land vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanulla has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wwxN .casaa.M Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research fi-om an article frons 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanulla has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecios do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecus at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Deal- Ha\aaii Count' Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2011"! nl-C t u r:s`1 Cl: 1 1 I ails wrltlil y to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 Which Would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places_ beaches. and parks. As xyith any bill. the fact of the matter at hand has to lie based on truth. facts. and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand Vapor Is harmful to others. Wily is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill teased on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii CountV Council originally- asked Mr. Kanuha to amend 13111 302. jMr. Kanuha agreed. since then Ivir. Kanuha has not abided by the councils W fishes. W11V has bill 302 not been amended'? Also. at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testil•\ ML, in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. `'Ian' of the council members are not fully educated oil Ecigs. The followings web site contains good information and research on ems x\w\\.caSaa.()r Former council member Ms. Ford quoted I-CSearCh from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecios frons China. not all ecigs arc equal, as not all restallralltS WIll `iii e you food poisoning`. Please do not let an outdated Lu•ticle influence your decision. I=urthermore NvIr. Kanuha has stated he \\ants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering-, from ci��arette butts? Ecius do not leave behind butts as civarettes do. EclQS leave no trash at all. It slakes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many eCIU users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder tile efforts and accomplishments of former Smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base \'our decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which lobs me of 111\' liberties. and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this ullportant Issue. lv. Dear Ha"aii County Council: ►? Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 =� b titI q: � 1 I am writilloto express 111\1 opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places. beaches_ and parks. As vwith any bill. the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth. facts. and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient Sc1entit1C facts that second hand Vapor Is harni til to others. Why is the I-Iawall County Council corisidcring a bill based on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee nlcetimg for Bill 302. the majority of the Havyaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. N41% Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided bw the councils v\fishes. W11V has bill 302 not been amended? Also. at recent public hearinas on Bill 302 there has been more people testilN ink,-, in opposition of 13111 302 than for it. lManv of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on eci,s X\ X\ \\ -CISl.I.0I'L1 Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article h-om 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China. not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants MH give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdatCd article influence your decision. Furthermore \-1r. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecus to conform with the current smoking ban. \Visn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from ci�,arette butts? Eci.zs do not leave behind butts as ci`,arettes do. Ecus leave no trash at all. It males no sense to ban eci-,s at parks and beaches. The health of niany ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts alld accoillplishnlents of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacc(). ` Please base wour decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly ur0e you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of in\- liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smokin` ill public places. Thant: v0LI 1-01- your consideration of mv position on this 1111portallt ISSIIe. Sincerely. Avf Lxl 96yN0 Dear Hawaii Count\ Council: � PI p• Subject: Please Opi �pose the Bill 302 . • i 1 and vvritin(yto express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill. the fact of the matter at hand has to be based oil truth. facts. and teal evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawall County Council considering-, a hill haled on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the Cirst committee meetin for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii COLnitw Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha aereed. since then Nir. Kamilla has not abided by the councils wishes. W11V has bill 302 not been amended? Also. at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying 111 OppoSltloll of Bill 302 tllall for it. ` iMail\, of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following, web site contains good information and research on ecius \\+����.casaa.or Former council member NIS. Ford quoted reSeal'Ch from an article ri-om 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China. not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will gi\ e you food poisoning_. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Ivir. Kanuha has stated he \wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smokinu ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of litre:rim-, from ci<uarette butts? Eci��s do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It males no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and acconlplishnlents oFformer smokers that have used electronic ci`garettes to quit smoking tobacco.. Please base vour decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly ur;_e you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of mw liberties. and illy freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of, 111\ position on this important issue. Sincerely. , -, 6/ -D` -3 < g! 2F6 ` el- 380 C ('' I✓ , i{i }A I Dear Hawaii County Council: Matra 1 G x.11 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth. facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear• hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302• the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on eciurs www.casaa.oru Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article fi•om 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence \"our decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of eci-as to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecius do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. it makes no sense to ban ecius at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties• and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thant: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely. f L 14,4 C✓ 7-1,4 e7 �p X 11770 ,C!,4 /uta — it/,4 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vvww.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to male the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, c, (y i`e L(�nertrv�ani UNC �J �Mc.� rOM ;g �R err E mi C1' 12 Ll.il - It�,i I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vvww.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to male the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, c, (y i`e L(�nertrv�ani UNC �J �Mc.� rOM ;g Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or_- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 141S 0V \k\X 1 1I- Com n{1 •ae•��r ,')fit Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 '' JUI 9' 12 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wAvw.casaa.orL, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Eda an mOkl . '" A Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302'- �� C 9' 12 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wwvv.casaa.or<g Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, � I - tK� arcj�1-�c �@ Dear Hawaii County Council: „�,,,, r;i• { }'d 9. 12 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or,_; Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �[ty-px 4,d GW e u `r� Dear Hawaii County Council: I Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vvvvw.casaa.or« Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vvww.casaa.or,(,, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into. law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thanl< you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, -Vo E5 z) -U �a div --,/ •%1 Dear Hawaii County Council:ni G / ,tt �U.1 T,_C 1 F.r� (ii: 2 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs N-N%vw.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r, Dear Hawaii County Council: y Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The.health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1 : t 12 u I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �tIAA owl ?I 6,T0E--P,+rz Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 2 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orL, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecus at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 tet,; � I.i ••":�7 2014 C;C 16 X"I 9- 12 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orgr, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this nri-•i' ,i 11 Dear Hawaii County Council: n '+ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, -� 9711V Bio i� Dear Hawaii County Council: 2f nrr 16 AJI �: F Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 n7r ! G tai I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or(-, Former "council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for .your consideration of my position on this important issue. Since ly, K.�ICRN Au�NI,� MArnOMA PLAN (i ���q� �r2z -(os&4 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ?p',q r;rr 16 � 1, a: 13 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs %vww.casaa.or(Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thant: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely. `�Ylwu�.� psi mr4zCU-% Ratwo^ Mei RoBr� �� �rabo • Caw\ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w\vw.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �rrc-n�uyc�y #?o ®�ma/. cap» lair•. i hs_ti_ti'�1 n��lV i.1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 � � � 1 6 M 1: 13 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs %,\,ww.casaa.or(-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 3-lD o ��uvlu hN 1, 0A ko"JI4 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2T11rTr1GITg:13 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or__- Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. nceNly, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 n A ift 2' ;..i� E p!7r 15 A1i 13 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \.vww.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Ily, /.V410 i. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 16 �• t 3 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs %vNvv-v.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, J L� k k- e A �" I I 'D R I T 0 I) qtl, LA — 0� 6 4- Dear Hawaii County Council: t2 1 9. 13 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v-vwvw.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vvwx-v.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Ala wl KS'" Dear Hawaii County Council: 2� _ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<!, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Q-,� \ � CA. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ,.zr cry• - �5e+�+ t� 16 Ali 9: 14 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \vww.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thant: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council:s Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying; in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs w\-vw.casaa.or�L, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �� i cell XU - 3337 Ak� 9�• � y� jc�'-'s 0 4 S�e Q i'\ f" Q 17 Dear Hawaii County Council: ` Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 � 16 `111 '1. 0 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based ou fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not filly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \vwx-v.casaa.or« Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, [�-& I V\ a, � `''- & -'- . CX— PC) b ' �� CAt Coo ►�-, l P �1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 0: I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs-vw\-v.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will (I've you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. KanUha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs nie of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 21,ij1 OT 16 /f1 9: 14 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research oil ecigs www.casaa.orL, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from all article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thant: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Wdo f'UbPX ?2a(D?-SN VVA,AL-',0L, , I+1 aVIPS q Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 01.'� '' C 1 o fl -1 c: 14 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, V t - A-3 0,11'11 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or--, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely 0M Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ,pl, nTr ' 6 L11 9- 14 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not filly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<,� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China. not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 14 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 *?lel pyp � � Q; I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 301 the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www'.casaa.or(_, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your chsideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Cl e�ih n QJYJ �w` Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 r 70''! nr C 16 /A 4: 14 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<g Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C 41,(it L�Gv c�, le, ,©,k,,?,, k-,eot. co,, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 K14,1 tir 6 ;�: 14 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many.`cig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill X02 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, lt�llltl-- Alt 40-ZA AT Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 C ,Of f� ft! • •'r1 � � .111 PU 16 AM 9= I LI I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs v-vwx,.casaa.oru Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated lie wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thankyou for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, [)ea-na- Icy txj to�el to N60& & M q016 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 rc 16 111 9: 14 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vvvvw.casaa.or�( Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important Issue. Sincerely, -79- S,4�-aC/ locolw, .57• lc4it. A IC"IA 14) 1 6�7'/6 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I':� 1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ww\v.casaa.or<u Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article frorn 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 7n:pi =� t l I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs xvww.casaa.M Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. _ Sincerely, A 4K )* A 4)46�� XXXi& I L. &ID Wt 'Wo Kku kA M. gb0l, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are -not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wvvv-v.casaa.or� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, QM4,c,+.,rnl,C�n I�is� m Dear Hawaii County Council:16 , t F Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 A 9. 15 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs ww%�.casaa.org� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, fir, .,, ;•�r -� Dear Hawaii County Council: C 1i "' 9: 15 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wwxv.casaa.or<, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article fi-om 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecus at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, _Jznn,-�-cr �ah��gD PO�jI a� /�apo�acl, �i 9�7� '✓ � .. .... Vis.,. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains Good information and research on ecigs w\.vw.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research fi-om an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecias do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecicys at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, &AAV* 13' 460 U6wk VO Kg►�aav �� q(� �S Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 LG -r C,- f b F 1 1 15 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.on-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I;CIACP C'11eP� C.hCkcP Cee rl Dear Hawaii County Council: R.0 16 15 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orFormer council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, N'' 0) "-A&, I ti ke'lle, /V IAI',tl Alf y2S V7 (100P Dear Hawaii County Council: 79'tl n,",, 1 v AN n: 15 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wNv\v.casaa.or(-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, L� ', Dear Hawaii County Council: 1 Zl't`1`:f, G n: t 5 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs vvww.casaa.g!!g Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecus at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. XAV- t6, ��- Z- - C- Al,,,, -%Y- 5033 I-IUA41-A 5-r .• Ul Dear Hawaii County Council: 't+ n- F 16 tJJ 7�y.' 15 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, V, oz yi c. i Dear Hawaii County Council: ���;'i'C 16 i 9: 15 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. PO Vi31 LLU CL WL �'7 S Dear Hawaii County Council: to "1S Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302 the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issu . Sincerely, \V�V,A AAe-c0'\ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 `$ ... 'A I Zcl'" � 6 PH 9. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear_ hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanulla agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the councils wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testilyin-gt in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecius .casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article fro►11 2009. "fllis article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China. not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article Influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanulla has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban eci«s at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to gLnt smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smokin(� in public pl . Thank you for your consideration of my position on this Important Issue. Sincerely. �4' 4 1 -C, � A VVa_A� 4 _ i+t q�Pi-34 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 l•?iif•i i c � iS'.i�^� f Cit! O:C 16 111 4: 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering- a bill based on fear_ hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee sheeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kan►lha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanulla has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifvina in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on eclUs ��w���.casaa.or�� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from til article fi•on1 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanulla has stated he wants to make tine use of ecus to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering frons cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as ci�oarettes do. Ecus leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban eci(,s at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit S1110kil1`? tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly Urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and illy freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. "Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1;► C !6 Ni 9: 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the ttse of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts. and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecig,s www.casaa.orL, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining, to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence \"our decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecig,s to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the orig,inal intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Eci(-,s do not leave behind butts as ciparettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban eci,,s at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Nc�i�1c��� wink \' L -K) q,3-7--7 i Kkt4A kolAa lf' Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 P b ���� c. 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meetin'o for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or(-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence Your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Eeius do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, RoSua F�J k/o t� �0 430 _265 �, Imo- KoN� g6�4D Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 L .3 C 16 All 9: 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wwNv.casaa.orL, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1 ,L �1 ►i1�1► \ � 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: "T't t7(1' 16 t:N O: 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ccji G: f`f17 `!c G 4111 (11%: 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article frons 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecus at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, c. `2015 Dear Hawaii County Council: It!VI 6 111 17: 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not frilly educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \vwxy.casaa.org Former council member Ms- Ford quoted research fi-om an article fi-om 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all, It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, P,V 7�07� 4-2- hIvyu4ne, Y��/�72(,0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 r. f'. f ' s..• � 1� '. f f 7- G, I G7 -C 16 r1`1 9. 17 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ,Tc?- C�J 0 W7 �5- o Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �i2 3Sokl�ioiy L",l*&:7el5 Dear Hawaii County Council: LCIS DEC 16 M 9, 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evil: nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ?A tibA , Ki ��"7� PtJ"IJP � I e ri. t rTA!` , Dear Hawaii County Council: �s !4 ! 6 in, 9: 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 71VI r"C 16 til 9: 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,rnce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r I - /&, keu h i- 6-eil6 Can1l P.}1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 17 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 0"C t 6 N1 9: 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /dWe 41 Invier Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 C':."TY 20!1,1 DIEC 16 Mi 9: 17 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 20IN C -C 15 pJ] 0: 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,: nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2T,'3 nl ^7C 16 X61 9= t 7 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidrence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C�'t 6 y e,--_ , ;�, % � I? Dear Hawaii County Council: 2MI, nrC 16 fill, 9: 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evil: nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, -6 le"I OnA V I I Cc�,--' Pa �,, if! (� 71 Dear Hawaii County Council: Lig:': EEC 16 %;T 9: � $ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely 2 Dear Hawaii County Council: Oi{f I'rG 16 cii >: 108 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ZQl=, 0,r 1; 16 f:Rl 9: 13 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 " l� 1011 "777 16 111 117. 13 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or%z Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 4v- U r- V- Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 if1" 1 rC 16 Vit; 9: i I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2C'? i % C t b 111 9: 18 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: S;rr S G AM 9� S Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 Ulf K!" r ,r 16 till g. 18 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prbvided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, / - &e-c'Ot V,2e) , >-- 'l r C, r,'Kp ^n+r l_t: X11 Dear Hawaii County Council:�yv f Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orm Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ©C14I pLCu;r{ ► Pu U\ 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, v 5�,01 S 7 rUL o 141 �' Dear Hawaii County Council:I nc�6 tu1 9; 19 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 211,111 EEC 16 AM 9: 19 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 zu`"' fOE 16 �u1 a1• 19 4 •.� e/ I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evil: nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 7 111 rr- Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 . , �� 16 l►i 9= t 9 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council:=!•'1'' 16 Ali j Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, < t / Dear Hawaii County Council: C 16 IV 4. 19 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evida nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, G-11W�4)� &,14 k L I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, n Su, � �(Va 0 I �� Dear Hawaii County Council: s._C 16 N 9: 1a Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, n Su, � �(Va 0 I �� vti._.:ti Dear Hawaii County Council: AN 9: 19 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 61CcA P6,eee'leA *eAft4ev �ANoA 4AIVA I I Dear Hawaii County Council: MI! nrC 16 All 9: 19 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have user?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: p. E r 16 j,t.1 9: 19 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �hc QV7 to ri' Dear Hawaii County Council: d } A 70111 rirr i 6 ',11 9: 1 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, X n V -L13-0 -z? <1!�- "4 045 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 oint41 r)r-tT r Q: 3 9 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r � Dear Hawaii County Council: t�;,1 0;,� o 111 9: 19 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&:nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ti 1�i t454— o . -7 K V `71.,3i 1 1 Ca,. Dear Hawaii County Council: f7 m!11 G 111 9: 2d Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, PO a&� , 474- IV72 1 If i' (( f - K Dear Hawaii County Council: 29i ► �r, 16 !1i 9: 20 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, V Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evince? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, LU vr-a/% LvA- A-IU R, -tl-I 107 7 0 Dear Hawaii County Council: , r � R .t,_r E 6 P�� 9: 20 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidl.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ory Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Pi�vl7�9C-��-f l Dear Hawaii County Council: "i1;,q nc << . , _ r 16 19: 20 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �A P (A r Dear Hawaii County Council: t,q Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 4� - Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �C" 7C 16 All 9: 20 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /l/aL 1144(���� 0. 2<< :z = � ��77Y7 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 20111 PEC 15 All 9: 20 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �C�Wlu'C)lu,�o(',Ut)00 no -V -(A, c �Act�N-L�C) �� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 E "f ' f• 4•, i ,init, 'cr 16 111 9: 20 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, WWI?& � Knee -n ctr+ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 'del. '.l 'I/ ^.,-..) cm3 nd AEi O. 20 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evida nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ort; Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �qv� IGv� G KQ�tnnut.t ��GhGU • C;�'n-� Kcmi6trnG KeUL4h14t Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 67 Vm1,uuZa AP, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 rr!7r 16 t11 9: 2 { I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,xice? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,ance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.M Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /" ,cf, e '.✓1..�'.i! � Gc_yilli A':;:;�a�i Dear Hawaii County Council: 0 r C 16 1.11 ;': 21 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, -- el�amoix �ye� Uri �g Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Lc outs . tu CI ivs << Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 cs;,13 :• I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidsnce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, pn. hi.2A0& tZ 7 fti Ji 7 -T, Ij i i R Dear Hawaii County Council: e f,.l °• 2 I Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 201!1 01�C 16 krl 9: 21 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,;.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ory Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 `!7! n7r 16 01 9: 91 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely; 1 �Gi612r o . 1304 ql�- /?,-,kv l t I q6-7-10 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 :AIS 179 "' 16 r -N 9: 21 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my posi ' on t im rtant issue. ,Sincerer C" CC! FT 'di Dear Hawaii County Council: 70 11 !! p1 �r� 1 � !�lI9 `' 2 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1tlum-'S ,, ll , 47 ti. (tee iyf� Dear Hawaii County Council: f IT 11 t=� i fia s: 2 ! Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orR Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �1G�ile �l�h([xl . a r Dear Hawaii County Council:n►z�"r 16 �� o_ 2 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, c� A)e,)4e C-4 / Dear Hawaii County Council:M 1�.. ,_CC 16 Ott n; ?2 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: C7. 011 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, M I Ch tit 0441dki (�n" �� fiarGt Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 -jnq't' 9�r ! 6 AN 9: I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 1'JI " I 19 51,?? Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evida nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: lova orEC { b X11 �: 22 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,rnce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: 2M!,f I �fl„ , c«;'_C 16 22 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Cn rte— l✓``�_' a t t:', ?tib Dear Hawaii County Council: '77- Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, e ku; CSI c,� F f Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2I!? r'rC 16 Ali 9:22 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,_nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council• 22 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, &, k4-) AmiD6-- Dear Hawaii County Council: ?r't"t' 16 ?? Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,--nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 41-u4t /moo. Bvx 55� iCt1rfiJ`�Dcvn �tl 9��(Pf.J Dear Hawaii County Council: C 6 9- 22 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my positiopeq this important issue. Sincerely, 0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 001 C`C 16 All 9: 23 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /,,4n 141(77, Dear Hawaii County Council: 7911" C7 -C { 6 t11 9: 2 3 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, / Cn i Ck We 1,1+L,)0 L Dear Hawaii County Council: Lt+l�; [i'C 16 1111 oi- 23 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Po. J30)( III PahoG; Ni 96p'-77�3 Dear Hawaii County Council: L 1 � E C 0: 24 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: r('1 rrr 16 G; 24 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid:.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, J�;In fUr 7* ,,,Q,.R- Dear Hawaii County Council: Qrr 6 fli 9: 24 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,•nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �}eAl� ' IVB A�/A 60,1 z t- T� q67 -7 Dear Hawaii County Council: ^r^ 2L� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ory Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, T 2 X --\G2, i C)l.P 11 ,�, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,ance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ory Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: . It t� y -C 161 9; 24 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,ance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ory Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 J 7 t !9 ^16 24 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,rnce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ►tea, in ��� �-k-�- �/n � 7� Dear Hawaii County Council: IT.. T! �'"r 16 F.' i 9: 2 4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �� t� U;�i Cc L Dear Hawaii County Council: �}g�+ [. 7T `i Ur 16 /,N 0: 2 y Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, J a I I (��i I I i i r-;1!( tom, l i r.'yf1Y�l Dear Hawaii County Council: 2M.1 DrC 16 M1 9. 24 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 24,wAwn Dear Hawaii County Council: 7n,;; nrc; 16 k4 24 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1 9 A414 LUT G /J�Q Dear Hawaii County Council: �L??'C f 6 iii e. 25 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, � U u, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 lii.'f. t r� Fi r l Z v i {. 6 11t�� 2T4 LK -r 16 All 9: 25 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I , Dear Hawaii County Council: 2�t�'' 9: 25 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evida nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �es�s eldlniv� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 l a, '2 si ri n4.(' i � S. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 Cr,. ! - -V 1 .r.�� r I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. n • -- - - --- I-- �1 �t±, �Rr � r•, t• p Dear Hawaii County Council: 7.,1!?' UC 16 All 9: 95 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, .s i� �' IES 2 - Avg! Dear Hawaii County. Council: 6 MI 9. 25 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: �ptrt nrf i �s Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 p �` �'' '' 25 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid,snce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oFormer council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(,' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, .. r Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 if?" �� ! ' (- �, I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid,ance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ✓ A Y �c c Dear Hawaii County Council: 2illII !1T 16 AIN 9: 25 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ;tom Jj L ')(� 7 e- / - ^!'.!17 Dear Hawaii County Council: /nv! nrr 16 `'9 0. 26 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 7,,,r' PrC 16 1.11 5. 26 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do.. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, `7 'i Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 : • i* 6 26 I am writing -to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(,, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, re"A-N W . - Lc,k6y�� C) cP✓�vv i.l��' ars Dear Hawaii County Council: P r rrf 16� � 9: 7C� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: n.. 1!7r _r 16 Ing r.,: 7, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose. the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-'lded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, nr Dear Hawaii County Council: • ^f1rr �- Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 16 27 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r_ r [+fit s ,AI Dear Hawaii County Council: � 41!rI nrr 1 b AN n: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 27 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering,a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely Lo Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ' 1 u f,''1 27 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, i VA4 P! t l7 C. G'X IJ60 rq-AA�,Hi gL,30 j Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 27 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, a -0I 1 (tel ,r. li Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose. the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: . n, c err 16 N, 27 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Ins' r7r ! b i:� a ;': ?.7 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: n- Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig-users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, L;Z—_z a Dear Hawaii County Council: 2r+,= I rLi c n Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do, Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(,' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ° ,'ri 9. 23 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: •• n. 23 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidl.-nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have user? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: rn•R 1+7 f If Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig'users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do.. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: '1 '�. i �� c;: 2 v Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 29 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore -Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 1.P;(! 01cr 1 a r(1 9: 29 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking. tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, CY Dear Hawaii County Council: 29 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, PAHOA 141 96T99 Dear Hawaii County Council: la; g. ?_9 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-vided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, QlC£ffip�,C'SF-, Dear Hawaii County Council: � �+ nf 16 111 9: 29 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: �P,,! Pi : 29 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes, no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �n� t'; 9: 29 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places., beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes. no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. . The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: / p Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the'council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: �7,1!1 yyI1 -: '7a Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, g i Dear Hawaii County Council: Z+'" 11'�7C 16 tl 9: 29 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pribAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �'� 7 7, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ` 16 I'l 30t I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.m Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec;, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, LA Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, R:) Dear Hawaii County Council: , Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pfm4ded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.M Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 2 12 ra O 2 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /'/v -7e Dear Hawaii County Council- r 11 C17: . 3 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �`► I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orR Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 6 Dear Hawaii County Council: ;tI f�• �� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid- nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: �-t nrr 1 v Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couaty Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, }C✓"�45 e5�q ��arj TCn `l 1$ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 tJ I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro,Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I�ch�aL-t�,� j i G � t to . Dear Hawaii County Council: 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore -Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C I t; Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 `'` I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1 ��LT 177), X41 tt.. o .�•tt.. C� Dear Hawaii County Council: ftt II 1"." / r �+r Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ,,E , :r o ['� I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do: Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oriz Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �.r -)->'K q Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 f- `' 77r1 LIN c. 1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, L -77Z s , s Dear Hawaii County Council: Sub'ect: Please O rl7r ( ° J ppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orR Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, e- , �-7 -��-- Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prbAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please -Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig' users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 79 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has hot abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, J� ��� cl �,-, 7 7Y Dear Hawaii County Council: - Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not promided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C w r%S W i 1GLk Lyc-Q ,7c">T�'_ Dear Hawaii County Council: I n: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be.based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proxided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prbv'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore- Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking fan. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, .r a `•I Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do., Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �c Ck 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: ,?nlo PCS A 0: 2 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ,_ ,. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ore Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 0 Dear Hawaii County Council: 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, M(-,ZU4 kfvfe � Dear Hawaii County Council: rr t r Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 32 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, // 7 Dear Hawaii County Council: All 2 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, G Q E l3 -!l39 Li -r C r, t Ave. &ww N.j�'- 76-77e Dear Hawaii County Council: 0 32 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 V I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincere , e'b /(o - 2Po til Ac"Ou (to- W (A rve--� Cel tt�k &1A ft4 �R 144 S C Dear Hawaii County Council: Atirt n,7r t^.i1 %� .32 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sinc ely, veq Dear Hawaii County Council: ;,!-T 16 P'i "1: 2 b.l_A t Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ry✓Vt 5f C)40 5 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, zo 0 C, l a� Pei h. c--zq ) H 1 1-14,-7 7 � Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, L 10a tr n•, ' a er t[! 1 1F1 Dear Hawaii County Council: ;2 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, W1 '. c r Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, }:4 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: `,. -41 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �.4 �y� ° {' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. l 3 -blloef-e 3/ � kc, -t Dear Hawaii County Council • Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: '!'iltp rrf%16 + " .. , Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ', fir, c0wc It Dear Hawaii County Council: r,. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, .��y `52- Dear Hawaii County Council: b All S: 33 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: �'g^� ! ,,.. O Puy i Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 fi I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prbvided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, VV On Lao, 60v� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or%z Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.-nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Atr ► 6 r:�i o• �3 fN1 W Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, � ��% Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �5 7721 �r;11• ,s Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parkas and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, tc> Gj I ? 7,e 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: J tA .� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts�not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, V—k Awl I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Lx,, I JGium$ JS -2 -TS') 7 7-e Dear Hawaii County Council: t.+ ; ". '33 .a Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Lx,, I JGium$ JS -2 -TS') 7 7-e Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 33 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others., Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C a r c u- w i I bu V 1b-�-I Flo R�nglca DnvieJ Pah0Q 41 ci (a-1 -1 6 Dear Hawaii County Council: . ,, � 3 : Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others, Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, y Dear Hawaii County Council.• 34 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: �,�.t �� 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 i I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Len a. o 1761111UA� .r ✓� ! rrA �. Dear Hawaii CountyCouncil: , . �;j"i err, ► � E►�: 34 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.m Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council:-� 10' 0. A a •, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council consideringg-a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 34 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coukity Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jcopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, a�1ar tit *"rl�I COv:d 1 1 CLI ilii Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 Phi R: a Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. T Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �.01!VTY r1 FRK �t���., 3 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coukity Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, coln , CLERK uki! 4 ..- l ,,�tj�.} col Y� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ON- t r!Trz Dear Hawaii County Council: "14 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, MN v\ V\ YQO V) cLEIRK C�4i4 Dear Hawaii County Council: .34 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. TI Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, qt, C01 -JY PLER �co! 14'! Dear Hawaii County Council: 4; fir_ C 16 MI 9* r Edi Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council 'considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, CCL'j " I LEIRK Dear Hawaii County Council: ncr 6 AM 9: 34 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: l� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 pan E� 16 t" �' 3 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, -?k!=, � r V �TVvs0 K Rd��o Dear Hawaii County Council: co�''li Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2�;? �?!- 111 Q'35 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodiided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Comity Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �� 4b � t Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 %;II''� f C I G fli r%' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pr`od'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council considering -a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ore Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �t r r Dear Hawaii County Council: Nn , , . ,�.5 o Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 4= kyr 6 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pibVIded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Z --V o, I (/ !�e�, Dear Hawaii County Council: 35 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 t�;'I ~~ `�"�' 00: I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pibAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, K�oJ Cc _., Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 r;,,,', I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. 4-1. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, WtAIG�VA P4AVI q�-7o y Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ' .i lr viii Dear Hawaii County Council: _ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 6 Lilt I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this.important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 11 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 l'`� ' u Ni o. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore'Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1f �� 1-��,L�r� �f�� 710 Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evida nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �0 clo-lb - Dear Hawaii County Council: Ini'l f17 16 ffl!i 08: 35 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, k 5 � Dear Hawaii County Council:=M1 o. 35 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: r17 C 0 Ll Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ` I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 71t 7! !-i:7n v U t.l 1 75 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidsnce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, j �. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evida nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, f�0a Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ` I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ` UJ�r�y > `o .5A, 1 O C CO Q Dear Hawaii County Council: t, t-� so �� J Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 `' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, res-i:�.��e. ame 4L`x. Dear Hawaii County Council: , -c Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, l i.. , %, r.. _. '.•� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1 ;'! rC r fA -6 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,•nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, _W�'A_line IM��k;SSG, �(4II�n Dear Hawaii County Council: "Cl!" 17, 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, o � � �- • C-cSVt� Dear Hawaii County Council: j 1 / 0' %., Jv Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 6 0 � �J I &-� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, &A L LI 172 v7 /i t4 1,)uz--4�r )�D <- �� 77 Z Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1 { � X-- ' S E i 9: 3 6 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, .L Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ti Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, IL eta,=� i�,�� 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: o, -, 6 rig �t `, ,ice y J j=.�'1 /• �' Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 01: 36 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: !6 f 6 ." Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, eJ •_ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 L' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, t�hJ�J oj Dear Hawaii County Council:1C7 �..// ( 9� 3 6 ,+ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C( Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 00tff"-f &LAPIT PA Hvq , 1�-1 (o 7 7 9 Dear Hawaii County Council: nrr t �b Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&-mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, i r. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my po ion on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: e. ' 6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Since y, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa..org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: y` pp 9 37 ill Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 JJ I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 37 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,: nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council • 7 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: iL o; 7 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, _3 3-5 Dear Hawaii County Council: t o. -, r= j G l.�1 7 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: not P' ..^'-l' 1 �• �7 Subject: Please O ppose the Bill I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier altern tive to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my pion on this important issue. Si Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 414n 4�AS4�*g< - " zs-,;�-w4 0,,5klo -Z:57 , e��7-77—Zg ,/ 5q Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302;.!' rr� b F:;1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position is impo an e. Sincerely, Y7 4�6--�747 �-. • �'� ' tis . , . i -, Dear Hawaii County Council: n Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidsnce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, po V;vx 2202 IVahoA N1%1'Y9 r,r.. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidr.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r Dear Hawaii County Council: t �7 h(1,t f1 n A j, �• 1.. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 6 C&11 -r LC�� 1 ^ 1 Dear Hawaii County Council:17 L Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (�luai lG�lfi Dear Hawaii County Council: 37 i `S C1• -a Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 `-`'} I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, i Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302f'',' i C I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, j �Iy11 (�Z iSSo� / 40-L-- � Z.�,� .- —__ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, U L C Z79 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1, JJ. ' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid, nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 7 intIf P,7r Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. I` Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �a._�s LW �11 - �r Dear Hawaii County Council: 9• ', Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, l C4 (-0,7 < �f) :i Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, If Dear Hawaii County Council: n:`� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pr`odided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council 'considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, _ (i Dear Hawaii County Council: /o, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.m Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used'', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 2!;. , Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jcopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 0r oft 11�� i�L f6-:. U,t. — 9677 Dear Hawaii County Council: r 0: 313 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: S: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �y I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coupty Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, . .r , Dear Hawaii County Council: ... e ...r� 16 A, �• iV Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based 'on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses'', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ��p72© Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pib�ded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2'r'v' F; _r 16 M 9: 30 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid..nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, #7 L-0 h� Dear Hawaii County Council: RC1,, �,�� 4 � a�'1 �• .� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 [fl c;• S Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: " "'i i b Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: C', � ♦� � �' Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 C', I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 'Atli r-�r 6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be .based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: nr ri r,!7 l l ; � -C 16 Pal 9: 38 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council 'considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, A Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pib-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1A3 P Lk�1 s.fi cc Dear Hawaii County Council: t"11 "30 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pibAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, `llmor\—I-tkX-e►rct- Dear Hawaii County Council: 31 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 4,1 9' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pib-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couiuty Council considering -a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oru Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering-a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, , j ;' i ` Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pib-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Councilconsidering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 0."A,w �hlh-AY or Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 Zt16 1,11 9:30 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Comty Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, %,t 5-n ,J. />- 1 k G ?0 'fix 7,5 -)) k� I�o4 +4 ( IC-74-� Dear Hawaii County Council: 2 C C 16 f.;I 9: 39 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodiided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C - C 0 KVI P11 1<11 kz rf Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pibVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law"Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �� Rff -"a T(w t6l b ymbqbAw A+ �c�o � trt q��2Q% Dear Hawaii County Council: ^ r9. �4 1�L31 • .. J Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid,:nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 14 NWqLAct� Q(,lo'l'20 Dear Hawaii County Council: 4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2011 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C)-7 1 76- -7 * ,cr Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1,39 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council 'considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Sol 14g1-\&ai q61 to Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 CU - R &I ri C 16 Ail g39 9: 3 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council 'considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or-a Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, n r ii 'A Dear Hawaii County Council: F„ o. - �q Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, CUA (zimy:d S� �'lTVJaL)JC4 C� Vii, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ! "1 LCI "7 �i f Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Cowty Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: .,.:, 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coukity Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. �7° Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C�� LUa�,s+e o- oc, . �aa� �� tau W464gq i + 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: 39 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 : `,� 1 ' anti r, I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, W Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1,�i !'" v 16 Pall c. -32 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Councilconsidering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, (J -z T—, D- t,q f ! I ` 5 i Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, vs, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �,r 1 P.i`t I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pibVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Kean a %rnon i � r i Dear Hawaii County Council:nor { b jai 0' 9 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 004 i4IAM kA AMOA1 H► Qo `u1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 16 i.11 9: 39 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Councilconsidering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used; electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, L Uk < - 't -t � �D Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 iutlt I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oru Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, , Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 b Nil c' (1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pibV'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used; electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: n 2IJVI P'.0 10, f.i;1 9: It 0 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coupty Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: o, 40 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Comty Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, V � �.�IL. J�! 1 • • •l S [ tt77 Gt Dear Hawaii County Council: `t4„''. [= y b !iii 9=4 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 46Af) 0GI . \ \' CA. Cu — f'71- O')A cz S +a Dear Hawaii County Council:, P. C Q Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pioVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Mlw,� l ,liG 1 � 4 I, Dear Hawaii County Council: V , c• 110 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. Aa with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, D44610 104 6 7 ka / klal Otis S t bF, Io J f, `472—v 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: 201111 5 P.11 c: I'M Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As, with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �kt tchi AA t r cAnck & �CT Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1 6 %:►� 9� �0 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pr`odiided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, A7 I Ck i0 w Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 L „t 1. - l I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pib-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �t EJB...'.. Dear Hawaii County Council: t v ro: t0 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �..:i I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, :xr�-J►yl wd q Q! -P dta, CI(,C,-1Llri Dear Hawaii County Council:6 a9 ri" • 110 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not p&Vided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coukity Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: o. L40 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: ! Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 7It, �� � o �" g' t10 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, k c, vo r- Ak CLI Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2�I�} C } G �° 3 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coukity Council consideringg-a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 67 Z) (4ZIe- 4z rw-Lpn TY C v `;t Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couiaty Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 9G -IL-5 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 tci4C 16 o; t} I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not peoVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, e5��� 46-1(— g677r Dear Hawaii County Council: ►� c; q Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jcopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 6k ^--- Dear Hawaii County Council: � !°:'� der ! 6 11 9: ij f Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, SAI L L, XZAA Dear Hawaii County Council: ii'1 9� 4Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pibAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ls,Ui11, Iu j��� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couiaty Council 'considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council:i ��� e"�1 0: tr j Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evid,snce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, mvi To 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ;�31i! I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coukity Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, W t t -L k Ni Dear Hawaii County Council: rc , Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1 ~, I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Int JAArk tel- I✓�i Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 2i'1 CSC 6 til I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ft -,Or �trmtlU�e q��yq r. ; , Dear Hawaii County Council: ` Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ;6 M I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 10ab DMJ-4-0 ![)-a kj� 'r r Dear Hawaii County Council: Q; V, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jcopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pFod°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. 4;. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /`z J- � �, �� 1 i Dear Hawaii County Council: t 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pFod°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. 4;. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /`z J- � �, �� Dear Hawaii County Council: 2�lEi CSC i G FJ'i ;': t, I Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. V Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r/I 767L-/0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Z9nC�;S P.1 9: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orR Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 0,1-7r,l G it 9: tj I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pFoAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, G Dear Hawaii County Council: # 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �TV,C-ej 1 i W k, 0 5 ` 6 7 �1-d Dear Hawaii County Council: 2l'► CSC 16 del 9: 4 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pibVided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1Jk t w 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: ,* o, 42 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jcopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 t 9: 112 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used; electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council 'considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 �..h`U ! S 2cip C. C 1 u 1a1 ": *1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Vr'Wnwaaa- MINOR - VEIN ,r,14 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. AS with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �/� 1� . loot 592 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 li'� ` '�r t;Ii I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. A$ with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, bra U f6O-T-4-f��+'I'lro fel �, d - et- � 6 zc;,+ L..�1` E• Dear Hawaii County Council: � r � 17C' 16 All Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r� -.,.A 4041 (rAvrcAi- f .D I VY ISC;5 k-(AhV,I -� 1+Lk67 `Z Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 U 1"1 `i 9-- V 2 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. AS with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �1 U 1 y ace4�- L/ p��y ,1 •..11' _ it �. Dear Hawaii County Council: e r t12 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 rr 4 6 t,�1 9 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, NA t_A-N I sT )rA L- H I 720 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. AS with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. 4Jb7 z $ Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 �,, !� s,,l i Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. AS with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. to rh af K I K Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 6 rJl ir/: L(� I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. AS with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 -- I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, q0 ki 7�� �� Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /g�/ Pante 'Pw�i Sfi [( s Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ;.,.t � ��-� � I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. AS with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, M4 u., k/61 / K3 66 X B�l y &-Y Palo n r c4- s Dear Hawaii County Council: , Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. AS. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidrnce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 2 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As, with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.oriz Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 r7r 9: Ll2 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As, with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council:j Ali Q- I! Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. A!i with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, l-757W<o 4 jq ��- Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Zit �T { 4 t1l G,, Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. A!i with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 11�; 0") 0 ti J S-� i �'t 4 •, l,�. Dear Hawaii County Council: All a• t�3 10 La ,. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As. with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, VI(cm. mAh",e, Lr (0 Dear Hawaii County Council:Ll 1 19 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. AS with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, c Dear Hawaii County Council: ,r.„ nr� Vit, �• �� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 9G 7 7 8 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, rA ' Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 Oil Subject: Please Oppose, the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ` Q: E13 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ;..i I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-lded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: r� ► b t.l �: t1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proa°ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig'users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincer ly, 14 C v Dear Hawaii County Council: novi r!"P 16, :►"► �: a Subj&t: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Lam\ 4.... i..,,. rJ Dear Hawaii County Council: Ot' Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing.to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, UIIYN 1-�NV4 Ani/ 0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. k Dear Hawaii County Council: �. r Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 =" ' ► '"' I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore -Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: -,P!r F7 116 Iii 9: L Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-vided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: , 3 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do., Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, A.�. M� T' IF �� L Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I am writing*to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have user? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, v. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing*to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ors Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have user? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 27 rr� i t3 /t7 (1. 113 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: PleAse Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore.Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I'' L!3 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 167 Dear Hawaii County Council: t Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid,: nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �Affj LN i Dear Hawaii County Council: tr Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 t I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1; 7 J,- . Dear Hawaii County Council: � Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, O°'''' n. _.. n rl4 Dear Hawaii County Council: i ' t o 1` ! Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prbAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ptic /fid rtee,C•u,XI/ . �,�75�I Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: n. L+ i Subject: Please Oppose. the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prb-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orR Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prov'lded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or%z Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, -- �V ��SGU'/C ,J f r ,!::;'/6-7-7e f Dear Hawaii County Council: }} r p 1 (;• L Y Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 : : G 1. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-vided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, l \ 6,4C- Ros& rl;g Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, t t . Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, LJ L ` • 1 .w Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-vided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orsz Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, _i Dear Hawaii County Council: f, C. "'A Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 p,.. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: .r , o• i t Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 `�'t,li I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid,vnce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.orR Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, '�1 Dear Hawaii County Council: 0 - Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, e Dear Hawaii County Council: E ii•'; r7c { G ts Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evid,ance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. A Dear Hawaii County Council: �I.• Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, MY-, .f _.l �►'A► „''� Dear Hawaii County Council: t Subject: Please Oppose. the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-Aded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, .a Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 nc I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on, fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, i LA Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(,' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ;5/2a ro;-i 41,7c , -e c r> /I/ 9 n Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 i3' T 16 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ,"0 ; Dear Hawaii County Council:r 1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, L�4eOIVI / anx /,go gAn P I(. 96� 7? --D Dear Hawaii County Council: 5 L .�n.,. �*r� { L i e �• C�� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, q�1 �- Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the'council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As, with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: +t! Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing'to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 1 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 n,.�•� r^f" y � %.s'1 Cis �''� I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(,, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: �^ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pi'mAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 4 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, LY -4e" ocl r7% 0,d� t q6 7 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 71+ --' D � Dear Hawaii County Council: o. t, S Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �ey -A4 %aL & is Lod Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 7t911 Pi C 16 1111 14 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanulla agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �1- �Ifo � �-O- � �-* � � Dear Hawaii County Council: �_ , ; 0. 07 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �7v C 9, ;eb `lam q4oD-0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodiided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council consideringg-a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alteeo to s ing in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my pn,#important issue. Sincerely, F r Dear Hawaii County Council: 16w+ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couo.ty Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: , o, t 16 r,s1 10 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prod'ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council 'considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 '1fl,' 4 G E} I I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: L c f Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the'council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /--/ - T Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ry �. • \ •it r irk\ ,pi,1 prt� j w �. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs wwvv.casaa.or(-, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: c: 137 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, JAL 4,5-6-nCA� U)n, �� -T- �Aqv-7A:) •ir p'i't' ,' • ' ,.'' - 1'+ t r, a Dear Hawaii County Council: nv, r 9� !34 -r t b r Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: �. ,• , Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 11"k -I Vi�l ElOMf-5 -L A() N"10 �1' �, �- �' 14�So Dear Hawaii County Council: ; ; 1 b tmi Q: 137 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, m"WA im"'o Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 �`ir r 9. 07 s� E i �� i Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: x(1(1 �:� 6 « �' 137 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, d, (20 ho 0\ 1.4', 7`7 �6 C! . �`. ;. 1_... e • ,�.Llli•` � Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 A4 � Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 3021 the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or<� Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence y©ur decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear, I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 7s - r 2 5— AI' Al d 6z -e -A Cc.. Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 4 1 am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches. and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts. and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302. the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Ka►luha agreed. since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifvin�� in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs yvx vv.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smokino ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering fi-om cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecias leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria. facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smokin« in public places. Thank: you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely. U L.�.i S t��1• ,fir ir, r�jt $f Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 !11 9: 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Ott► i?r 6„► 9i 17 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,mce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Kfm,. \\\ MOW\ Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 1_PVI 0"C 16 All 9: 13 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 fli Q• 20 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evi&=e? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have use(', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, I A Dear Hawaii County Council: 1,11 9. 21 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,.nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, /V/1�1�- )/Z T" A I i I � Y V Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 WIN DEC 16 am s: 54 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs \.Nww.casaa.gEg Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, be "u. V ( 907�M q`2Z-6gy6 Dear Hawaii County Council: 17" C 16 VM & .E Subject: Please Oppose the 1301302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 whica would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public plac(�s, beaches, and parks. As witbr ,!ny bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kari, iiia has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hanc vapor is harmful to others. Why is %e Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear.. hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting or Bill 302, the majority of the H;, vaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bi'.Y 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since ti- -n Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why h is bill 302 not been amended? Als -, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more p.;,-)p'.e testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members ,+re not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research in ecigs www.casaa.org Former c4, ancil member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from "..009. This article was pertaining to -ane brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not G? �. restaurants N*;ill give you food po; Toning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your 4ecision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of (,,(,`gs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking bo',. at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarefte butts? Ecigs do not leave behim, butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and b,.-).ches. The health of many ecig users i in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed r )to law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomph� hments of former smokers that hz 'e used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. PE -ase base your decision on Bi `'1302 based on science not hysteric,, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which n jos me of my liberties, and my free('om to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public_ places. Thank you for your consic =ration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Ly Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: n+},r1 T:(, b j, 3 � 59 V-, -J Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, zl� V -57 ,;�-•s>s-���� ams Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 CG. _G i ?Vim ur o fill 8: 59 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, C ,W'? 0 . � O 1C Q- 8 7 Dear Hawaii County Council:t59 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. -xy_s7ll �+ �: Dear Hawaii County Council: n�►� t? t' 1 fi ��+ CO Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 r;J r -r E ' "11 0: 06 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: t3:"�: 132 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 Ci ;A?i ?Tli DSC 16 P1 9: 132 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, d '701 r1 h <►�; n� - tt-i 96�r in — CG*,, I - ,I r! i . , t. r;��, Dear Hawaii County Council: 7 .,, TT 16 ill1 0: Subject: Please Oppose the Bil1302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, yr Iu a' 1lt Dear Hawaii County Council: �n?'?t bu'i g. t�3 L Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org_ Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 7 nr , Dear Hawaii County Council:' r f;"r 16 9c 22 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, �.0 Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ODA MMI Dear Hawaii County Council: it 0`r ( b E..11 9: Zit Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, q ( -1017 lL/(a(t �o s I-�0��cw��, ql 7 qs- Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 201' MEC 16 '11 0. 2c1 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.or%z Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, {{ Dear Hawaii County Council: 0 Z C E 6 9. 2S Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision ill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to opp e B 11302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choo a healthier alte tive o s king in public places. Thank you for your con ration of my po itio / t important issue. t t1 Dear Hawaii County Council: L!t 9 ;!-C 16 Pug - 25 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Jiliv 3�� CUf), t Dear Hawaii County Council:.;0':`l �- 0'—C 16 V1 0: 25 ��.. Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, t4 • X381 S � • � C'�� %ate Dear Hawaii County Council: k q; %X:"! � r�Er ::�; I b t;:1 Z Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, r f- Dear Hawaii County Council: Zu 3 �, r _ 16 2 u Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, 67 (0 - --) D to Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, f -, W-//, /01 � V Dear Hawaii County Council: moi' � �� �^ : t(li i.i { �' .•' i.1 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not pro-ided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses' electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, ... ".. Aild Dear Hawaii County Council: 16 P1 n. "30 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, t! 1 1n Dear Hawaii County Council:` M Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 ''""i �t � I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: _ Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not prodded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted 'research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. CincPrPly 5. �l V e r, 1hR Dear Hawaii County Council: �. ?n; rYr ! 6 �;ll f• Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org, Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Dear Hawaii County Council: ., Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 L` I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidl ,nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec?, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, cc it Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evidance? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Dear Hawaii County Council: Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, CTEl 1,K C 06 Dear Hawaii County. Council: ►!! DEC 16 M °� Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coukity Council considering a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have usec? electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, F i.i-N/ r RK Dear Hawaii County Council: 6 M oi-' 314 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Couxity Council 'considering -a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. V Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses'', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proQided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Cougty Council 'considering -a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. ��++�y �� Dear Hawaii County Council: 1.1 t1!�f !u• 34 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proQided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Cougty Council 'considering -a bill based on• fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig. users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. s Dear Hawaii County Council: 1' D[f 6 P 9*- 35 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not proAded sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii Coutity Council considering a bill based on. fear, hysteria and no real evidence? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.ora Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig.users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have uses,', electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, c��3S rr Dear Hawaii County Council: , ! � �;7,6 Subject: Please Oppose the Bill 302 I am writing to express my opposition for proposed Bill 302 which would ban the use of electronic cigarettes in public places, beaches, and parks. As with any bill, the fact of the matter at hand has to be based on truth, facts, and real evidence. Mr. Kanuha has not provided sufficient scientific facts that second hand vapor is harmful to others. Why is the Hawaii County Council considering a bill based on fear, hysteria and no real evid,e-nce? At the first committee meeting for Bill 302, the majority of the Hawaii County Council originally asked Mr. Kanuha to amend Bill 302. Mr. Kanuha agreed, since then Mr. Kanuha has not abided by the council's wishes. Why has bill 302 not been amended? Also, at recent public hearings on Bill 302 there has been more people testifying in opposition of Bill 302 than for it. Many of the council members are not fully educated on Ecigs. The following web site contains good information and research on ecigs www.casaa.org Former council member Ms. Ford quoted research from an article from 2009. This article was pertaining to one brand of ecigs from China, not all ecigs are equal, as not all restaurants will give you food poisoning. Please do not let an outdated article influence your decision. Furthermore Mr. Kanuha has stated he wants to make the use of ecigs to conform with the current smoking ban. Wasn't the original intent of the smoking ban at parks and beaches to rid the area of littering from cigarette butts? Ecigs do not leave behind butts as cigarettes do. Ecigs leave no trash at all. It makes no sense to ban ecigs at parks and beaches. The health of many ecig users is in jeopardy if Bill 302 is passed into law. Passing Bill 302 will hinder the efforts and accomplishments of former smokers that have used, electronic cigarettes to quit smoking tobacco. Please base your decision on Bill 302 based on science not hysteria, facts not fear. I strongly urge you to oppose Bill 302 which robs me of my liberties, and my freedom to choose a healthier alternative to smoking in public places. Thank you for your consideration of my position on this important issue. Sincerely, Al