Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0021.130 2014-2016Murashige, Laura From: kevin kremeyer <kremeyer@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 201412:56 AM <-- To: Council Testimony, Wille, Margaret o Subject: GMO overturn appeal, v Dear Council, Since their inception, we have studied the dynamics of genetically engineered/modified orgaJyms and their effects on the environment, and have definitively concluded that their ban is very positive for Hawaii and rescinding the ban will be very bad for Hawaii. The fertile environment and multiple seed - cycles sought by the producers will lead to an even more concentrated negative effect on the island(s) than on the continents. We were very relieved when the council voted for the ban, and with this recent ruling by the State, we are both dismayed and angered, viewing it as a direct affront to our ability to keep ourselves safe. Our mission on the island is to ensure secure/safe food, water, and energy, in particular uncorrupted by genetic engineering and its many consequences. With the ban in place, the ocean will safeguard us. Without the ban, we will suffer consequences more quickly than the rest of the world. Having a safe stronghold against a global scourge and corrupted food supply will prove to be the most valuable asset, in which we can invest. We cannot let anyone else dictate our fate to be one of accelerated/concentrated introduction of genetic material that cannot be removed or undone. This is our home and we have the right and duty to keep it safe and uncorrupted. Thank you and please appeal the judges ruling, fighting with the island to keep it a healthy sanctuary against a global scourge (the island will benefit greatly from this in the future, as our products will be prized around the world). Sincerely, Dr. Kevin Kremeyer Dr. Margaret Kremeyer Comm. No. Ref. To: Ref. Date— DE 17 7nte