HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0160.003 1998-2000
HAWAII ISLAND BOARD OF REALTORS®, INC.
"The Voice for Rea! EstateT"' in East Hawaii"
: REALTOR®
To: County Council Members
From: Hawaii Island Board of REALTORS®Members 14 Waianuenue Avenue
Date: March 4, 1999 Hilo, Hawaii ss72o
Phone: (808)935-0827
Fax: (808)935-4924
E-mail: hibr®interpac.net
Enclosed are letters and memos from 46 of our members opposing the changes in
the Sign Ordinance.
We would appreciate your taking these letters and memos under consideration in President
Helene H. Tajiri, R,GRI,CRS
your Public Works Committee meeting.
President-Elect
Should you have any questions please feel free to call me 935-0827 or our Christopher Brilhante, R,GRI
President Helene Tajiri at 935-3378. vice President
SlrtCerely, Jcel K. La Pinfa, R, GRI, CCIM
I(\~~,~.~., RECEIVED Secretary
- oU U~ ftme_..-.__-.3 By.._.__..._._-- Heather E. Hedenschau. R. GRI
Delene K. Osorio ~$h
Executive Officer ~~Cpunty Gounu~I~P'Yu Pc Treasurer
-~.1~;_.-_ AdeleEggel,R,CRS
EnCI: Immediate Past President
Edith Crabb R, GRI, CRS
Directors:
Joanne V. Baptiste, RA
Ricardo Barbati,R,GRI, CRS
Mary R. Begier, R, CRS
Priscilla M. Garcon, R
Lany Hull, R
Kelly H. Moran, R, GRI, CCIM
Gary L. Rothfus, RA
Executive Officer
Delene K. Osorio
Executive Assistant
Loveyn A. Bosnian
REALTOR® is a registered
collective membership mark
which maybe used only by
Comm. No. / ~ O ' ~ real estate professionals who
are members of the
File No. NCC NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Presented PW PC OF REALTORS®and
Ref. To: subscribe to tts strict Code
of Ethics.
Ref. Date 3 - S - 9 q
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 11:08 :02/03 N0:726
• • 7 i-170 HUALALAI ROAD. SUITE B-IQo
- - KAII UAKpNA, HI!1671n
BUB. (BOB} 32&9616
FAX (808)92&2860
ALOHA PROPERTIES E-MAll al•tl•YIIKWii,n«
WE99nE MIp:/Aww,181•w•Ii.nW-•bM
WEBSITE rXlp:!/wrw.COlf1x•6ynkM.com
March 3, 1999
County of Hawaii
County Council
Re: Bi112g0 Chapter 3 Article 1 relating to change in sign ordinance.
near members of the County Council:
It has keen brought to our attention that the above referenced bill proposes to change the
maximum sign size from the present eight syuare feet to three and one half syuare feet.
Please be advised that, in the real cstai< industry throughout the country, for sale signs are
a standazdizcd size available from a few lazge vendors. Because of this nationwide
standerdiration, the cnsl of the sigtts is greatly diminished. Our company, Coldwell
Banker, reyuires us to purchase signs through their chosen vendor. Signs 3 & I /2 ware
feet are simply not available from this or any other vendor.
-Phis would mean that all of the real estate companies in dte County of Hawaii Qp(y would
have to order custom signs from a sign maker at a tremendously higher price. ht addition,
we would be required to throw out all of ow existing signs. Signs which our company
just received at a cost of 51,375-50 plus shipping.
further, Hawaii Starr law requires that certain information appear on all real estate signs
and those of us who own national franchises ore also required to add additional
information . By the time all of this is added to a for sale sign in a 3 & 1/2 sf format, no
one would be able to read it so what would be the point of erecting a sign at x117
For yow information, the real estate market on the Big Island has /vst begun to recover
after a disastrous eight years. As surviving Real Estate Brokers, we must tell you that the
for stile sign is the rnosr gfJeclive tool in scl[ing property and the County now proposes to
take it away.
FacB Olfica Is IndBpendenlly Owned And Operated.
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 11:08 ~ :03!03 N0:726
Match 3, 1999
Page 2 of 2
We cannot impress upon you enough how important this issue is to the real estate
industry. We implore you to reject this portion of Ai11260 and Veave the sign ordinance
as it stands.
Respectfully submitted;
Kristen A. Hoskot R, DR
Co-Owner/Principal Hmker
v++
Gayle A. Ching Q
Co-Owner
8089357575 ALR K,AI REALT'r INC. 168 PO1 hIAR 02 '99 14:07
~
i •1
J 1
Fax: 969-3291
Alma L. Prigmore
Principal Broker
To: Hawaii County Council
r
Re: Resting March 5th, 1999
Real Estate Signs to be 3.5 Sq. Ft.
I'm amazed the County Council would take valuable time
needed on so many items to even think of changing Real
Estate signs to 3.5 sq. ft. and discussing this?!
ids have had a horrible Real Estate market for 9.5 years
with a huge number of Realtors' offices closing, Realtors
going for a paying job because of all our monthly expenses
as well as Realtor Associates leaving because of expr-nses
` and no sales.
Now you are wanting us all to go to the big expense of.
having new signs made to make the sign-makers money!
i don't get it--
i Please vote this down!
Respectfully Submitted,
i Alma L. Prigmore
~ Broker/owner
~ (In business since 1976, own office since 1982--
struggling since 1997!)
bcc: Helene Tajiri (R), President, HIBR '
II
1
i
'I
Telephone:
Bus. (808) 961-3833
P.O. BOX 4656 or: (808) 969-1117'
HILO, HAWAII 96720.0656 Fax: (808) 961-3849
R~~ E-Mail: alprigmorelaol.com Res. (808) 966-4663
f
03/02/99 13:59 FA.Y 808 934 7400 SAYIO REALTY BHC f~002
Mr. ,Tames Arakaki
County Oouncil (2~aizperson
The undersigned hereby request a revision of Bill # 280 draft # 2
wherein references are made to realty signs. 'Ihe six (6) sf limit on realty signs
as it is written in the current ordinance is acceptable. Lovering this to 3.5 sf
would place an undue burden and expense upon realty cort~anies.
The undersigned also support the revisions to Bill # 280 as stated
below.
Re: Bill# 280 Draftp2 Amending Chapter 3 Article 1
re p.8 section 3-7 # 2: Delete the word "dedicated" as many sub-
divisions are not County roads.
re p. 10 Section 3-9: Residential signs advertising the sale,rental or
lease of the residential premises shall be 6 s.f. as ordinance currently
reads and delete 3.5 s.f. There is no overwhelming need to make these
signs smaller and a change would adversely affect some businesses.
re p. 9 #3 Delete only 1 ground sign shall be permitted per iot,
even if the lat is occupied by multiple businesses". This is unfair to
small business owners and is an unnecessary restriction.
re p. 10 6 11 Delete that upon escrow closing sign must be removed
within 48 hours." Usually the realtor or new owner removes the sign .
Since this is not a problem there is no justification for more government
cumbersome regulations.
re p 12 delete Temporary signs are not permitted for regular ongoing
commercial use. New businesses may display temporary signs or banners
for 30 days following the business opening on a one time basis." Businesses
may need to display temporary special sale signs for example and if these
regulations keep mounting there will be more "going out of business" signs.
Add in the following that on vacant land for sale or lease signs
of parcels 5 acres or larger the sign may not exceed 32 s.f.
re p. 16 section 8 shall read" whichever is more° and delete "whichever
is less." A 32 s.f. wall sign is certainly acceptable.
re p. 16 section 6 Change 25$ to 100. A window sign should be whatever
the business owner deems reasonable far his business.
re p. 25 Delete section °a". Any sign already permitted should be
grandfathered in .We should not be penalizing business owners for following
the existing regulations and permit process.The existing signs are not a
present public danger.
Respectfully Submitted,
C'~~I~,,,,8, C~
l ~'a 6~~G
MRR-02-99 TUE 15:49 SELLENS & BRTES 80g 3256631 P. BI
TO: COUnty COUAGtI
Frpm: Hates Coauesrcial Gronv
Date' March 2, 1999
Subject: $1112$0, Article 1----rclating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new critezia.
Robert L. Hates
OJi0Ji99 IPED 15:01 FAS 808 J29 6693 CENT'URS .'1 BIG ISLAND f~001i001
To: County Council
From:
Date: Match 2,1999
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1--rotating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
nnaximwn of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requitement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
G~ i
Rorli~v Si~w
ROBIN SIMON
75-5909 ALIT DRIVE
KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740
F~.X ~ 9.35=4Qa~
FROM Dd Cdwns PHONE N0. 808 325 1627
t1dr. 03 1999 08:39PM P1
nfi ~Y-c~~-99 wEn le:l ElS.CNS & Eii7F5 eat fSpl ~
To: County Council
From. P;yjitia lC~tla...~ x ~pany
Dates March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1----relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maYimura of 3,5 square feet (including name riders and frame}. 'Phis will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having ro replace them to
meet the nety criteria.
-s~~u-Sa~1~2~~Y~...1~
~gXfo 93.5= 9 f
.z ~f
Tp: County Council
Ft01n: 1Y/
Date: arch 2,1999
Subject: Hilt 280, Article I---rotating to Roal I?atate si~ae
I very strongly oppox changing tho size of real estate "fir sale" sign to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (includlag namo riders and frame). This will
create a severe finaacial hardship on all reel cetera companies who have
aigtta that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new critoria.
/J ~1L A
I(l~rl bS:9I FiF`S() J2W Z~bZ-ISS f?08~ON l~l UlOJ1Sp Ufl'~ 1'RH
3-•d51 ~OPi I; HCL UfH r..'. - H..:y~l i g04 ~99P .pc q i I
MqR-03-99 LIEL 16:23 'LLENS 8. BATES 808 '56631 P. 02
TO: County COUnCIl
~i0m: Phv7 t i s se> > ens s cme~Y
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1---relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including namc riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hazdship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
Ly~~ Tp~~ Ra
~~X ~ `l3S- 4~a~
FIgR-83-99 NED 16.15 SELLENS $ HgTES 888 3256631 p, 81
TO: COUaty COUnCiI
From: vhiiis s.iiB.1R t r_e.flsnl
Date- March 2, 1999
Subject- Bi11280, Articie I----relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly appose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hazdship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace theta to
meet the new criteria_
~ana r~l - C~~ n9 ~ A
.
~ l l ~ s ~
r0'd ZbOS SZ£ 808 ~EPMEH u~ s6u~y0 d£Z=bO 66-£O-DPW
Mar-03-99 02:24P Action Team Realtyy Inc_ 808 329-8543 P_O1
MAR-82-99 TUE 15:"0 SELLGHS s Yt+in> -
To: Canty Council
From: ~/G~-7'/O~r/ ~F~-~ ~1 .Y~' .
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1----relating to Rcal Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
aeate a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
Mar-03-99 02:25P Action Team Realtyy Inc. 808 329-8543 P.02
MAR-02-99 TUE l g : "'w SGL Ltns w tlT~ i co -
To: Cig~ty Council
From: ~/G~TiO.d ~E~1~/ ~Dl .
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1----relating to Rcal Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
7
Mar-03-99 02:25P Action Team Realty Inc_ 808 329-8543 P.03
MAR-02-99 TUE 15 SELLE NS ~ Swig ~ ~ -
To: City Council
From: f~G'-T/O~/ ~F~y ~L -Y~'~'
Date: March 2, t 999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1----relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the siu of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3,5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
Mar-03-99 02:25P Action Team Realtdy, Inc. 808 329-8543 P_04
MAR-02-99 TUt 17:"~! 7tLLGnD a ~c~ .
To: City Council
From: ~/G'T/O~t/ ~F4~ ~D1 ~ -Y~' .
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bill 28~, Article 1--relating to Rcal Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
'
Mar-03-99 02:25P Action Team Realtyy Inc. 808 329-8543- P.pS
MwR-02-99 TUE I3:^N SELLENS & K~+~t~ ~
To: C~~}?~ty Council
From: f?G'T/O~r/ ~'Dl .Y•~-~' .
Date: Mazch 2,1999
Subject: Bi1128U, Article 1---relating to Rcal Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
~J'v' ~
Mar-03-99 02:26P Action Team Realty Inc. 808 329-8543 P.06
MAR'02-99 TUt 17:"y at~~.cn~ e. dn~ca ,
To: Cgg~~??ty Council
From: ~/G'TiO~/ ~F,a~/ ~1
Date: Mazeh 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1---relating to Rcal Fstate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hazdship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the cnaent size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
,.Iu~c . iIr
03 03 99 WED 08:15 FAY 808 J29 6693 CENTLRIY 21 BIG ISLAND
OO1i002
To; County Council
From: cynt
r~ ~ a N . r fah ~i't
Date: March 2,1A99
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1---relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose eUanging the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This wiU
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new critoria.
Se ~ . ~
03 03 99 R'ED 09:15 FAS 808 329 6693 CENTCR2Y 2I BIG ISLAhD
@J002~002
To: Count' .:ounoil
From: Jol,., Gr~~~-G'..s RA
Date: March 2, 1999~-
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1--relating to Reat Estate signs
I very strongly opposc changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This wiU
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the content size requirement with having to replace them to
mcet the new criteria.
Fix ~ 9.~5; 9Qa4
C21 BIG ISLHNU TEL~8083z9bb93 Mar 03 99 949 No .003 F.O1
To: County Council
From:
Date: Maralt 2,1999
Subject: Bil12A(1, Article 1---relating to Real Estate signs
I vory strongly oppose changing the sizc of real astato "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.S square feet (including name riders and freme). This will
create a severo financial hardship on all roa! estate companies who have
signs that meet the current sizc requirement with having to replace them to
mect the now critoria.
FA.x la 9.35 4~.z~f
1
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :04/20 N0:735
To: C~o~!r~. .:oun~cil
From: 1'~l ~c;n ~1 J_o~i~i~
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1-•--relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estatc "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including natnc riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate contranies who have
signs that meet the ct~rent size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
. _ _ ~
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :03/20 N0:735
To: Cff~~un.~ buncil
From: L~a~/le A.CI,:~a. ~'~-U,..~,vrr
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject Hill 280, Article 1-•--relating to Rcal Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing We siu of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3. S square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
7
~o ~ e~~~ 8~t
Fi4-X 7~0 9.35
= ~9 ja~f
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :02/20 N0:735
To: Co~w~ _ council
From: E,(. ,~~K~E. 12, G~,,~ur~er, ~r-;NCip al ,(3rolCGr-
Date: March 2, 1999 Celd~el i QAr+Kc r AI uhA ~oprrt,~rS
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1•---relating to Real Estate stgns
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including nazne riders acid frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
i
_
Oc.uh~ ,r ~
/Pr`~~LC~.~p
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :05/20 N0:735
To: C,Qun,, 'omtc~
Fmm: LEA nN S
bate: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi1128t1, Article l••--relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly appose changing the siu of real estatt "for solo" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 sgwue feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the cuaent size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
~~~3~ ~F
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :06/20 N0:735
To: Cows., council
From: ,~t{,i~}~ t~r.ll J . 1~~
bate: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1 ••-•relatiag to Rcal Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the siu of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square fcet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
sigtu that meet the current site requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
~'~X ~ 9.35; 4
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :20/20 No:735
To: CJ~nty ~ou~l ~~oN
From: ~ ,.nom i~~
Dates March 2, 1999
Subject: Bil! 280, Article 1-••-relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly appose changing the size of teal estate "for sale" signs t0 a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current site requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
.~..R...d
a~~ _
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :19/20 N0:735
To: Cou :ouncil
From: ~ , G ~
Date: Ma h 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1•---relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3,5 square fort (including none riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
3Z4- ~l~~P
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :18/20 N0:735
To: Con .ouncTil
From. (~Avne /..~~E.Ghe~~. ~q
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1-••-relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate `Yor sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
croate a severe i`inancial hardship on aU roal estate companies who have
signs that mcet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
t~Xtii 9.3.5
= 9 4
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :17/20 N0:735
To: C~o+r,. council
From: _lnhn 7err~,
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1 ••--relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "£or sale" sigr?s to a
maximum of 3.5 sgiutrc fcet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship oa all real estate companies who have
signs that mcet the cun•ent size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
~i~X ~ 9.35 4 f ~ 4
COLD4IELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :16/20 N0:735
To: Co n., council
From: .h~.,~.1 _5;,..11;
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1••-•relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "i'or sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.3 square fat (including name riders artd frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship oa all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria,
Fi9•Xto 9,~5
= .g~~ ~
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :15/20 N0:735
To: CQUy _ =o~unc
From: ~I` ,.sPll, R/~
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1•--•relatieg to Real Estate signs
I very stroagly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all roal estate companion who have
signs that meet the cturent size requirement with having to replace theta to
meet the new criteria.
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :14/20 N0:735
To: Cour~., council
From: ~,nde F" ~ia:ti:.raV ~A
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Hi11280, Article 1••--relating to Rea! Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.S square fcct (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all roal estate companies who have
sigtts that meet the current size requirement with. having to replace them. to
meet the new criteria.
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :13/20 N0:735
To: C n., council ,p
Frotn; ~ t~ x ~_a -J
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Hi11280, Article 1••-•relatiag to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.S square fcct (including ntune riders and fi~tme). This will
croate a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirernent with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
Fi9.X 7-.0 9.~5= 4~~~f
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :12/20 No:735
To: Coun...:ouncil
From: y~~, ~'r9
Date: March 2, 1 99
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1----relating to Rcal 1?state suns
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all coal estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
`-max 7,'0 9.~s
= q~~4
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03!04/99 13:46 ~ :11/20 N0:735
To: Cow. ~ouncil
From: °7~~, /~'JA,-/~..,~
Date: Ma ch 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1 ••-•relatiAg to Real Estate signs
I vcry stroagly oppose changing the siu of roal estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 sgi?arc feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe ianancial hardship on all roal estate eonnpanies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
f
i -
~'~X ~ 9,3s- 4~a~
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :10/20 N0:735
Ta: Cow. ~ouncil
];x0111: rgA~' ~ ~rIOwG~ ~A
Date: March , 1999
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1----relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new critexia.
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :09/20 N0:735
To: Coun., council
Frotn: E. Anne Loeaneky, RA, Coldwell Banker Aloha Properties
Date: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bi11280, Article 1----relatieg to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the siu of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders attd frame). This will
cirate a severe financial hardship on all real estate cornpanies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the now criteria.
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04/99 13:46 ~ :08/20 N0:735
To: C u Council
From: ~ le~ , t^ Crl:.f?sc~ ReS:~H'n~iu
Date: March 2, 199 Apps ; s e r
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1-•--relatiag to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3,5 square feet (including name riders at~d frame), This will
create a severe financial hardship a~ all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the custent size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
`M1\F r ~
COLDWELL BANKER ALOHA PROP ~ 18083292650 03/04!99 13:46 ~ :07/20 N0:735
To: Coun. „ouncil
From: r'.>ti..,-1; D. {1~„lsnc~~l~
Data: March 2, 1999
Subject: Bil! 280, Article 1-•-•relating to Rcal Estate signs
I very stroa~ly oppose changing the size of real estate "i'or sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square fcct (including name riders attd frame). This will
create a severe financial hazdship on alt real estate conapanias who have
sins that meet the current size requirement with havins to replace them to
that the new criteria.
~~er r~~s ~ ~QS sr~~
COX ~0 9,~ 4~~~
To: County l
;ouncd
From: .,~~.+~n~n ~s to-,.d~ Ci ti ~ Gr i
I?ate: March 2,1999
Subject: Bill 280, Article I----relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose d>at?ging the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feU (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requitement with having to replace them to
meet the ~w criteria,
i
TTO~IiO fi~l ONT''ISI 9IH iZ AEI[1SN3~ C899 BZC 909 TNd 9S~Zi RH.L BBi60iC0
To: C_onnty~
d
From: ~O~h C!'~ r~R'ti
Date: March 2,1999
Subjoct: Bi11280, Article 1--relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "6or sak" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name rides and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the glrrent size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
FAX 2a 9-~s-Qqa~
TTOi OTO Qj QISV'ISI 9IH ic' .T~L1LN3~ C899 BBC 908 TY3 9S~2t i]H.L ea~roo~en
To: County Council
From: C~~u.x..~ t tai ~ Ts ~ a„SZ~
Date: March
2~I
99
Subject: BiU 280, Ardcle I--relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing ihC size of real estate "f~ sale" sign to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name rideTS and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the cutreT?t size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
cox ~ 93s 4Qa~
TTOi600® QNV'ISI 9IH TZ EEif1ZN3~ C699 6ZC 808 TV3 9S~ZT RHS 66i EOiCO
To: Coon Ccuncil u
From: C1vr~~ a~ + ~ la-~--~ ~ m' ~ ~
Rate: March 2, 9
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1--relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changiag the siae of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name rides and fratna). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs thaT meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new critoria.
TTOi800ta) QNV'ISI 9IH TZ S&1LN3~ C899 BZC 909 %d3 SS~ZT AHS BBiY0iC0
T4: Cpunty CpynCit 1 `
From: ~7iv~~r-w ~ ~S 1~.~ ~ l w. ~ ~AylSc7 VY~
Datc: March 2> 199
Subject: Br71280, Article I--elating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sate" signs to a
maximum of 3,5 square felt (including namc riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current sizo requirement with haviag to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
Fix ~ 9.~=4Qa4
TTOi L00 @j QNd"ISI 9IH TZ S~I1l.LN3~ 1899 6ZC 809 TV3 SS~ZT 1lHS 66i60it0
To: County Council
lErom: Ce~Jwr-g T~f ~i ~ .~s ~ac.^Q.~
Ihtc: A~aroh 2,
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1---[elating to Reat Estate signs
I very stmngty oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.S square feet (it?Cluding tutme rides and framo). This will
create a severe fittaiacial hardship on alI real estate companies who have
signs that meet the cutrent size requireatent with having to replace them to
meet the now criteria.
l
~ << ~~~6~ ~o~
F.4.J~ fi 935- ~4Qa4
TTOi900 (~I QNV'ISI 9IH TZ d~I11LN3~ C699 BZC Rn9 rva cc--r nvr ea
Ta: County Counoil ~
From: ~t~ , nr~t rr~ 1 ~`S
Date: March 2,1
Subject: Bill 280, Article 1-relating to Rest Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (inchlding name riders and fraTna). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that mcet the cTUrem size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
f~~ ~
FA-x ~ 935- 4Q~~
TTOiS00 raj QAR''ISI 9IH TZ [Ht1LN3~ C899 BZC 908 TV3 S9~ZT l7HS 86i60i C0
To: County Councit ri f /2.ea ~ f+rt ~ t; R2 Cnn~1.v~ y ? i
Prom: /1>A~o tUa~s y ~o.So~~-~, ~
Date: March 2,1999 ``'S~"
Subject; Bill 28Q, Article l--relating to Real Estato signs
I very strongly oppose changing the sip of real estate "for sate" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe futaacial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that mcet the elurent size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
a e~ _ GRy
OK...2~
L~.X ~ q3~5=4Q~4
TT0~400@j ONY'ISI 9IH TZ EEil1.LN3~ f899 8ZC 809 TT'3 CS~ZT RHZ 68~EOitO
To: County Council
Prom: ~ ~ ~a-....51~
Date: March 2,19
Subject: Bi11280, Hrticle 1---relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the now criteria.
G~ e%"-~
Roca/v S~ti
ROBIN SIMON
7`.x5909 ALIT DRIVE
KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740
~~.X fi 9.3~ 4Qa4
iT0i0001~
QNY'!SI 9IH iZ EH17ZN3~ 0899 6Zt 808 T~'3 I'S~ZT nA.r. aa~rn~rn
To: County Council
From: s~o~- K. C~~r,
Date: March 2,1999
Subject: Bill 284, Article 1--relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including Warne riders and frame). This will
create a severe financial hardship on all real estate companies who haw
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
Fig-X fi 9,3u'
= 9Q~ ~
To: County Cannon
~rOm: VIRGINIA L e~T_ER_coN, CENTURY 21 BIG ISLAND
Date: March 2,1999
Subject: Bill 280, Artick I--ieNaatias to Real Estate signs
I very stroagly oppose changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This will
create a severe fiuaacial hardship oa all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the euTxent size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
{f~-;~-~
-w-- G~s?.X ~ 9..35- 4Qa4
TTO/T00® QNV'ISI 9IH ii .LN1].LN3~ C699 6SC anA vv~ ac~+r sa
PROM CENTURY 21 BIG ISLRND PHONE NO. 808 329 6768 Mar. 0-7 1999 03:23PM Pl
To: Coun~c Council
From: .?Ati~a ~~c,t~~ ?.r,
Date; March 2, I999
Subject: Bi11284, Articlc 1--relating to Real Estate signs
I very strongly opposc changing the size of real estate "for sale" signs to a
maximum of 3.5 square feet (including name riders and frame). This wiU
create a severs financial hardship on all real estate companies who have
signs that meet the current size requirement with having to replace them to
meet the new criteria.
3~/~aS
FA.X 7A 9.35 4Qa4