HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0544.000 2014-2016 William P. Kenoi JNtY or... Deanna S. Sako
Mayor •' • ��: \,j�;�; Director
Lisa K. Miura
=-- Deputy Director
County of Hawai`i
Finance Department
25 Aupuni Street,Suite 2103 • Hilo,Hawaii 96720
(808)961-8234 • Fax(808)961-8569 t7
October 29, 2015
r)
Dru Kanuha, Council Chair and
Members of the Hawai`i County Council
Hawai`i County Council .9
25 Aupuni Street 4�
Hilo, Hawai`i 96720 •
Re: Operating Budget
The State of Hawai`i Department of Transportation Highway Safety Division is
providing $200,000 to the Hawai`i County Police Department to be used to purchase a
Leica Scan Station PS30. This equipment will reduce the time it takes to reopen a
roadway after a fatality investigation and improve the completeness, consistency and
accuracy of the Motor Vehicle Accident Report diagram in fatal Motor Vehicle Collision
(MVC) reports.
Enclosed is a resolution to authorize the Mayor to enter into an agreement with the State
of Hawai`i Department of Transportation for this grant. Also enclosed is a bill for an
ordinance amending the Operating Budget by appropriating this $200,000 grant.
If there are any questions, please do not hesitate to call Hauoli Aiona of the Hawai`i
County Police Department at 961-2273.
/144
Deanna S. Sako
Director of Finance
Enc.
cc: Police
< • eS. 3 - 5). Bi tt X13
Comm. No. ,.c-L17
Ref. To: CULL
Ref. Date flCj 3 0 201
Hawai'i County is an Equal Opportunity Employer and Provider
Form #: B-52
7/18/91
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
DEPARTMENT: Police DATE: 10/22/2015
STAFF CONTACT: Sergeant Robert Pauole PHONE: 961-2305
A. REQUEST:
This is a request to enter into an agreement with the State Department of Transportation Highway Safety
Division for the purpose of purchasing a Leica Scan Station PS30 with accessories and training.
Please create an Ordinance to appropriate funds up to $200,000.00.
B. BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION (USE ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NEEDED):
The Hawaii County Police Department will receive support in the form of grant funding from the State
Department of Transportation Highway Safety Division, which is providing a grant to purchase a Leica Scan
Station PS30 with assessories and training. This equipment will reduce the time it takes to reopen the
roadway after a fatality investigation from 6 hours to 3 hours. It will also improve completeness, consistency,
and accuracy of the Motor Vehicle Accident Report diagram in fatal Motor Vehicle Collision (MVC) reports by
September 30, 2016.
r 0
SIGNED: DATE: OCT 262015
Department Head
GRANT SUMMARY
(Supplement to B-52, Request for Council Action)
Type of Grant Appropriation being requested: (New or an additional appropriation)
❑ New(for this fiscal year period). OR XI Additional appropriation (to an existing grant);
Is a draft agreement attached? Has the original grant notification been transmitted to
❑ Yes ❑ No Council? M Yes ❑ No
Name of Grant Program: HCPD Leica ScanStation/Training
Grantor: State Department of Transportation Highway Safety Division
County Grantee Department or Agency: Police Department
County Grantee Contact Person: Sergeant Robert Pauole Phone Number: 961-2305
Amount of Grant: $200,000.00
Grant Period (Commencement& Completion): October 1, 2015 - September 30, 2016
Purpose of Grant: To purchase a Leica Scan Station PS30 with assessories and training. This
equipment will reduce the time it takes to reopen the roadway after a fatality
investigation from 6 hours to 3 hours. It will also improve completeness, consistency,
and accuracy of the Motor Vehicle Accident Report diagram in fatal Motor Vehicle
Collision (MVC) reports by September 30, 2016.
County Match required?: ❑ Yes ® No
If yes, Matching Amount? Budgeted in account# :
In-kind? Explain:
Explanation:
County's personnel requirements: Amount of new position(s)?
Qty: Permanent: n Temporary: ❑, Duration:
Full-time: ❑ Part-time: ❑, Time Element:
Qty: Contractual: ❑ Explain:
Explanation:
Additional Comments about Grant:
B-52 Grant Summary Form
EXHIBIT I
STATE OF HAWAII
HIGHWAY SAFETY PROJECT GRANT AGREEMENT
STATE OF HAWAII HIGHWAY SAFETY OFFICE
GRANT AGREEMENT
Grant No:
Page 1 (To be completed by applicant agency)
1. Grant Title
Hawai'i Police Department Leica ScanStation/Training
2. Name and Address of Applicant Agency 4. Duration
Hawai'i Police Department Month—Day—Year
349 Kapi`olani St.
Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 A. Grant Period
From: 10-01-15
To: 09-30-2016
3. Agency Unit to Handle Grant(Name and Address)
Hawaii Police Department B. Project Period
349 Kapi`olani St. From: 10-01-15
Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 To: 09-30-2016
5. Location of Project 6a. Type of Application
Hawai'i Police Department (Check Appropriate Item)
349 Kapi`olani St. ®Initial ERevision OContinuation
Hilo,Hawai'i' 96720
6b. Reimbursement Schedule Desired
['Monthly ®Quarterly
7. Grant Description (Summarize the grant plan covering activities that address the major goals and objectives in
approximately 100 words. Limit to 6 lines.)
Hawai'i Police Department(HPD)will reduce the time it takes to reopen the roadway after a fatality investigation from 6 hours to
3 hours. Further,to improve the completeness, consistency, and accuracy of the Motor Vehicle Accident Report diagram in fatal
Motor Vehicle Collision(MVC) reports by September 30, 2016.
8. Federal funds allocated under this agreement shall not exceed $200,000.00
9. Approval Signatures
Acceptance of Conditions: It is understood and agreed by the undersigned that a reimbursement grant received as a result of this grant agreement is subject to
Public Law 89-564(Highway Safety Act of 1966)and all administrative regulations governing grants established by the U.S.Department of Transportation
and the State of Hawaii. It is expressly agreed that this project constitutes an official part of the Hawaii Highway Safety Program and that said applicant
agency will meet the requirements as set forth herein, including accompanying schedules A,B,B-1,C&D,which are incorporated herein and made a part of
this grant agreement. Authorization to proceed with this Highway Safety Project is requested.
9a. Grant Director 9b. Authorizing Official of Agency Unit
Name: Harry S. Kubojiri Phone: Name: William P. Kenoi Phone:
Title: Police Chief Fax: Title: Mayor Fax:
Address: Address:
E-Mail: E-Mail:
(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
To be prepared by applicant, use separate sheets as required. Form HS 3-71 Rev. 8/6/09
STATE OF HAWAII HIGHWAY SAFETY OFFICE
GRANT AGREEMENT—PART II
Grant No:
Page 2 (To be completed by Highway Safety Office)
10. Grantee:
11. Standard Area: 13a. Federal Fiscal Year
12. Effective Date of Agreement: - 13b. Addendum: DYes ❑No
14. Benefit of: EState ['County
15. Action Taken 16. Funding Disposition& Status
Fiscal Year Amount
Total $
Present Obligation $
Previously Obligated $
TOTAL FUNDS OBLIGATED $
17. Budget Summary(From Schedule B—Detailed Budget Estimate)—Fiscal Year Grant Period Ending:
Cost Category Cost Estimates
A. Personnel Costs
B. Travel Expenses
C. Contractual/Consultant Services
D. Equipment
E. Other Direct Costs
TOTAL FEDERAL FUNDS $
_ 18. Grant Approval&Authorization to Expend Obligated Funds
A. Approval Recommended By B. Agreement& Funding Authorized By
(Program Area Specialist) (Highway Safety Manager)
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Phone/E-Mail: Phone/E-Mail:
(Signature) (Date) (Signature) (Date)
STATE OF HAWAII HIGHWAY SAFETY OFFICE
GRANT AGREEMENT—PART III
Grant No:
Page 3 (To be completed by Highway Safety Office)
19. Addendum (For Highway Safety Office Use Only)
EXHIBIT II
SCHEDULE A
SCHEDULE A Exhibit II
Grant No:
PROBLEM STATEMENT
Idents the traffic safety related problem or deficiency that the proposed grant is intended to correct. Idents and gather
appropriate data relevant to the problem. Collision/fatalities data appropriate to the identified problem and a brief
analysis of the data is required When available, three years of data should be presented and analyzed When identifying
the problem, take into consideration changes in population, traffic patterns and other demographic dynamics that may
affect traffic safety.
The Leica ScanStation is a 360-degree laser scanner and panoramic camera that quickly photographs and measures critical
and fatal motor vehicle collision scenes,allowing investigators to reopen closed roads more quickly. The device also
allows investigators to create three-dimensional diagrams using the resulting data.
The Leica ScanStation PS30 and accompanying training allows the motor vehicle collision investigators to create realistic
and professional three-dimensional recreations of vehicle-related crime scenes.The diagrams are prepared in such minute
detail that some of their subtleties may not be realized by the naked human eye until long after the crime scene has been
released. Since the Leica ScanStation PS30 has been accepted in court,these diagrams can be used by prosecutors,judges,
and juries at trial.
Currently,the forensic mapping equipment being used will collect,on the average,350 data points per scene. The new
Leica system will collect more than 10 million points at a crash scene, which will provide a more detailed and accurate
Motor Vehicle Collision Diagram for investigators and prosecutors.
GRANT GOALS
Goals serve as the foundation upon which the grant is built. Goals are what you hope to accomplish by implementing a
traffic safety grant and represent an end result. Grant goals should be stated in measurable terms (i.e., a percent
reduction), be concise and deal with a specific item, be realistic with a reasonable probability of achievement, and be
related to a specific time frame (a "by"date). Please notate baseline from which the reduction/increase will result.
The HPD's goals in FFY 2016 in this area are:
• To reduce the time it takes to reopen the roadway after a fatality investigation from 6 hours to 3 hours.
• To improve the completeness,consistency, and accuracy of the Motor Vehicle Accident Report diagram in fatal
Motor Vehicle Collision(MVC)reports by September 30, 2016.
GRANT OBJECTIVES
Objectives are tasks or activities conducted in order to accomplish the grant goal(s) (e.g., develop permanent fitting
stations for child restraints, enforcement activities, educational activities, etc.). Grant objectives should be stated in
measurable terms (i.e., a percent reduction, number of training to be held, number of roadblocks, etc.), be concise and
deal with a specific item, be realistic with a reasonable probability of achievement, and be related to a specific time frame
(a "by"date). Please notate baseline from which the reduction/increase will result.
To accomplish this strategy,the HPD will achieve the following objectives in FFY 2016:
• Purchase one Leica ScanStation PS30 complete package,which includes all of the necessary hardware and
software for full functionality field use.
• Host certified Accreditation Commission for Traffic Accident Reconstruction(ACTAR)MapScenes Point Cloud
and Scan Station training classes.
METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using data gathered throughout the grant period, the grant manager will evaluate(1) how well the stated grant goals and
objectives were accomplished, and(2)was the grant cost effective? How are you going to show effectiveness of your
project? What will be the impact of the project on your identified problem and goal(s)? Provide details on the method of
evaluation.
The effectiveness of this project will be evaluated by:
• Comparing the accuracy and completeness of Motor Vehicle Accident Recoveries(MVAR)diagrams in motor
vehicle collisions(MVCs) involving fatalities.
• Record the amount of data collected by the ScanStation and compare that with previous methods of creating scene
diagrams.
• Record how many times the ScanStation is used in the field.
• Record how many hours it takes to reopen a roadway after a traffic fatality when using the new system.
EXHIBIT III
SCHEDULES B AND B-1
SCHEDULE B Exhibit III
Page 1
Detailed Budget Estimate
Grant No:
COST CATEGORY COST ESTIMATES
A. Personnel Costs
None $0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
B. Travel Expenses
None $0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
C. Contractual/Consultant Services
Host ACTAR MapScenes and Scan Station Training classes $40,000.00
The course fees will cover the class material, instructor's airfare,
lodging, ground transportation, per diem, and miscellaneous travel
fees, i.e., gasoline,baggage fees, etc.
Category Sub-Total $40,000.00
D. Equipment
Purchase Leica ScanStation PS30 and accessories $160,000.00
Category Sub-Total _ $160,000.00
E. Other Direct Costs
None $0.00
Category Sub-Total $0.00
GRANT TOTAL $200,000.00
SCHEDULE B-1
Grant No:
BUDGET NARRATIVE PAGE#
Personnel Costs
None.
Travel Expenses
None.
Contractual/Consultant Services
A company will be contracted to provide certified ACTAR MapScenes Point Cloud and Scan Station software
training. Costs will include the class material, instructor's airfare, lodging, ground transportation, per diem,
and miscellaneous travel fees, i.e., gasoline,baggage fees, etc.
Equipment
Equipment funds will be utilized for a Leica ScanStation PS30. Included with this purchase will be the
components, software, and accessories required to operate the ScanStation independently.
Other Direct Costs
None.
EXHIBIT V
SCHEDULE D
SCHEDULE D Exhibit V
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING & COMPLIANCE
Grant No:
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the STATE OF HAWAII by and through its
Director of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "State," and the Governmental Unit named in this
application, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant."
WHEREAS, the National Highway Safety Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-564)provides Federal funds to the
STATE for approved highway safety projects, and
WHEREAS, STATE may make said funds available to various state, county or municipal agencies or
governments or political subdivisions upon application and approval by STATE and the UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, and
WHEREAS, STATE is obligated to reimburse the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION out of its funds for any ineligible or unauthorized expenditures for which Federal funds
have been claimed and payment received, and
WHEREAS, the above name APPLICANT has submitted an application for Federal funds for highway safety
projects.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF MUTUAL PROMISES AND OTHER GOOD AND
VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. Reimbursement of Eligible Expenditures
A. It is mutually agreed and promised that upon written application by APPLICANT and approval by
STATE and the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE shall obligate
said Federal funds to APPLICANT'S account for reimbursement of eligible expenditures as set forth in
the application.
B. It is mutually agreed and promised that APPLICANT shall reimburse STATE for any
ineligible or unauthorized expenditures for which Federal funds have been claimed and payment
received as determined by a State or Federal audit. Costs are not allowable for construction,
rehabilitation, remodeling, or for office furnishings and fixtures - for State, local or private buildings or
structures. The following are examples of items considered as furnishings or fixtures, for which
reimbursement is not eligible:
Desks Credenzas Storage Cabinets
Chairs Bookcases Portable Partitions
Tables Filing Cabinets Pictures, Wall Clocks
Shelving Floor Coverings Draperies
Coat Racks Office Planters Fixed Lighting/Lamps
C. It is further agreed and promised that where reimbursement is made to APPLICANT in installments, STATE
shall have the right to withhold any installments to make up reimbursement received for any ineligible or
unauthorized expenditures until such time as the ineligible claim is made up or corrected by APPLICANT.
II. Property Agreement
A. It is mutually agreed and promised that the APPLICANT shall immediately notify the STATE if any
equipment purchased under this project ceases to be used in the manner as set forth by the project
agreement. In such event, APPLICANT further agrees to either give credit to the project cost or to
another active Highway Safety project for the residual value of such equipment in an amount to be
determined by the STATE, or to transfer or otherwise dispose of such equipment as directed by STATE.
B. It is mutually agreed and promised by the APPLICANT that no purchased equipment under this project
will be conveyed, sold, salvaged, transferred, etc. without the express written approval of the STATE.
C. It is mutually agreed and promised that the APPLICANT shall maintain or cause to be maintained for its
useful life, any equipment purchased under this project.
III. Application of Hatch Act
A. It is mutually agreed and promised that the APPLICANT shall notify all employees of the APPLICANT,
whose principal employment is in connection with any Highway Safety project, financed in whole or in
part by loans or grants under the Highway Safety Act of 1966, of the provisions of Section 12 (a) of the
Hatch Act [5 U.S.C. 118K(a)].
IV. Equal Opportunity
A. It is mutually agreed and promised that pursuant to the requirements of Section 22 (a) of the Federal-Aid
Highway Act of 1968, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), and the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975,the APPLICANT, as a condition to receiving approval of this application
submitted under the Highway Safety Act of 1966, hereby gives its assurance that employment in
connection with the subject Highway Safety Program project will be provided without regard to race,
color, creed, sex,handicap, age, or national origin. The APPLICANT further agrees that, as a condition
to receiving approval of this application, it will be subject to, and will comply with, Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. 2000d to 2000d-4 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), and all
applicable requirements pursuant to the Regulations of the Department of Commerce (Title 15, Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 8, which have been adopted by the Department of Transportation, and
hereinafter referred to as the Regulations), to the end that, in accordance with the Act and the
Regulations, no person in the United States shall on the ground of race, color, creed, sex, handicap, age,
or national origin be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected
to discrimination under the subject Highway Safety Program or project.
B. It is mutually agreed and promised that if the APPLICANT fails or refuses to comply with its
undertaking as set forth in these provisions,the STATE of the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION may take any or all of these following actions.
(1) Cancel, terminate, or suspend in whole or in part the agreement, contract, or other arrangement with
respect to which the failure or refusal occurred; and
(2) Refrain from extending any further Federal financial assistance to the applicant agency under the
program with respect to which the failure or refusal occurred until satisfactory assurance of future
compliance has been received from the applicant agency.
V. Non-duplication of Grant Fund Expenditures
A. It is mutually agreed and promised that the APPLICANT has no ongoing or completed projects under
agreement with any other Federal fund source which duplicate or overlap any work contemplated or
described in this project.
B. It is mutually agreed and promised that the APPLICANT will either revise this project or revise any
pending or proposed request for other Federal grant funds which would duplicate or overlap work under
this project to exclude any such duplication of grant fund expenditures.
C. It is further mutually agreed and understood that the APPLICANT shall reimburse the STATE OF
HAWAII for any such duplicate expenditures for which Federal grant funds have been claimed and
payment received as determined by State or Federal audit.
VI. Project Income and Applicable Credits
A. It is mutually agreed and understood that the APPLICANT shall apply all proceeds or credits generated
under the project, such as but not restricted to: The sale of real or personal property royalties received
from copyrights and patents, sale of publications or from personal or incidental services, to the project in
accordance with OMB Circular A-87 (FMC 74-7) or A-21, as applicable and NHTSA/FHWA Order
460-4/7510.1.
VII. Copyrights and Patents
A. It is mutually agreed that any copyrightable materials produced in the course of a project may be the
property of the State or applicant agency; however, provisions should be made to obtain for the United
States Government,the State Governments and their political subdivisions a royalty-free nonexclusive,
and irrevocable license to use in any manner such copyrightable material.
B. It is mutually agreed that the ownership of all rights accruing from any patentable discoveries or
inventions resulting from a project should be covered in the agreement. An irrevocable, nonexclusive,
nontransferable, and royalty-free license to practice each discovery or invention in the manufacture, use
and disposition, according to law, of any article or material, and in the use of any method developed as
part of the work under the agreement should be obtained for the United States Government, the State
Governments and their political subdivisions.
VIII. Certification Regarding Debarment and Suspension
A. Instructions for Certification
1. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the
certification set out below.
2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed
when this transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier
participant knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to
the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue
available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.
3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which
this proposal is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its
certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed
circumstances.
4. The terms covered transaction, "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "lower tier covered
transaction," "participant,""person," "primary covered transaction," "principal," "proposal," and
"voluntarily excluded," as used in this clause,have the meanings set out in the Definition and
Coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may contact the person to whom this proposal is
submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.
5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this proposal that, should the proposed
covered transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered
transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part9, subpart 9.4, debarred,
suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction,
unless authorized by the department or agency with which this transaction originated.
6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this proposal that is it will include
this clause titled"Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary
Exclusion-- Lower Tier Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered
transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions. (See below.)
7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a
lower tier covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4,
debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it
knows that the certification is erroneous. A participant may decide the method and frequency by
which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each participant may, but is not required to,
check the List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Non-procurement List.
8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records
in order to render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and
information of a participant is not required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent
person in the ordinary course of business dealings.
9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a
covered transaction knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is
proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9, subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in addition to other remedies available to
the Federal government, the department or agency with which this transaction originated may pursue
available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.
IX. Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—
Lower Tier Covered Transactions
1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this proposal, that neither it nor its
principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency.
2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this
certification, such prospective participants shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
X. Minority Business Enterprise Requirements
It is the policy of the Department of Transportation that minority business enterprises, as defined in 49
CFR Part 23, shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds under this agreement. Consequently, the MBE
requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this agreement.
The recipient or its contractor agrees to ensure that minority business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR
Part 23 have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts and subcontracts
financed in whole or in part with Federal funds provided under this agreement. In this regard, all
recipients or contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps in accordance with 49 CFR Part 23
to ensure that minority business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform
contracts. Recipients and their contractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national
origin, or sex in the award and performance of DOT-assisted contracts.
XI. Requirements
A. It is mutually agreed and promised that the applicant shall follow the State and Federal requirements
and guidelines set forth in the State of Hawaii Project Procedures Manual as amended. All project
expenditure records are to be retained for at least three years after the date of the final expenditure
report.
XII. Authorization to Proceed
A. It is mutually agreed between the STATE and the APPLICANT that this AGREEMENT OF
UNDERSTANDING AND COMPLIANCE shall become effective upon the STATE'S agreement
and authorization to proceed as set forth in PART II (2) of this application.
KAREN EOFF Os p • AARON S.Y. CHUNG
Chairperson ` •`` ��%¢; MAILE"MEDEIROS"DAVID
.EA,'!' ��/, GREGGOR ILAGAN
VALERIE T. POINDEXTER • -_ £ DRU MAMO KANUHA
Vice Chair ?� •�"�:�`.= DENNIS"FRESH"ONISHI
DANNY PALEKA
MARGARET WILLE
HAWAII COUNTY COUNCIL
County of Hawai`i
Hawai`i County Building
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawai`i 96720
October 30, 2015
Dru Mamo Kanuha, Chairperson
Hawai`i County Council
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawai`i 96720
RE: Resolution No. 330-15 : RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE OFFICE OF THE
MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF HAWAII
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PURSUANT TO HRS 46-7, FOR A GRANT TO
THE HAWAII COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; and
Bill No. 113 : AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 15-57 AS
AMENDED, THE OPERATING BUDGET FOR THE COUNTY OF HAWAII FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2016.
Pursuant to Section 2(g) of Rule 4 of the Rules of Procedure of the Council of the County of Hawai`i, this
written request is submitted with my approval that the above-referenced matter be waived from the
Committee on Finance to the full Council for immediate action. In reviewing this matter,timely approval
is crucial. It is therefore advantageous that approval is granted and the matter be placed onto the next
Council agenda for review. However, in the event this request is denied, for whatever reason, I
understand the matter shall be referred to the Committee on Finance for placement on its future agenda.
Sincerely,
4 .40-•
a.
r- Karen Eoff, Chairperson
Committee on Finance
rove ate/Waive to Council: Disapproved/Date/Refer to FC:
/0130/6
Dru Mamo Kanuha, Chairperson Dru Mamo Kanuha, Chairperson
Hawai`i County Council Hawai`i County Council
KE/wb
Hawai`i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer