Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0536.003 2014-2016P/Pe Member 20, 2015 CLERK Written Testimony- December 1, 2015 Planning Committee Meeting Regarding Communication 536 (Wille) Testimony on my own behalf ��(� �� 3 PIN 3: 56 Aloha Chair (lagan and Members of the Planning Committee I am a 2'h year member of the South Kohala Community Development Committee (SKCDPAC). My message is in support of the continuing evaluation and discussion of the importance of community development plan action committees in the County's organizational structure. Emphasis is specifically focused on the Planning Department's determination to schedule our general meetings bi-monthly. My comments are those of my own. I will forward my message to members of the SKCDPAC and Planning Department prior to submittal to your committee. Please understand that my comments are intended to be primarily used for the purpose of discussion. They should not be construed as a personal criticism of Planning Director Duane Kanuha or Planning Department staff. it is important that we all work together in common purpose. The history of the creation of the SKCDPAC includes the drafting of a community development plan by recognized and respected community leaders including many hours of time and energy contributed over a period of approximately 3 years. It's important to me to implement their vision of community participation in the political decision making process. It is mutually important that CDP Action Committees and County staff work in harmony to create a long-term grassroots forum process that encourages community participation in dealing with both current and long- term decision making. We are all in this together. Politicians, department heads, and community leaders change over time. It is critical that we create a well -defined consistently implemented process. On a personal note, I signed up for my responsibility as an Action Committee member to be of service to my community and take my volunteer job seriously. This requires attending numerous community and individual meetings with agency representatives, reviewing Planning Department applications and having a thorough understanding of other issues facing my community. Hopefully, my time and energy help make a contribution to playing a role in finding solutions to the many challenges that we all face. My role as selected public official is advisory in nature. It is an honor for me to have been selected as a member of the SKCDPAC. Saying this, I believe that it is important for me to be recognized as a representative of my community and not just a Planning Department volunteer. I feel that more discussion is needed between the Planning Department and SKCDPAC members regarding scheduling of general meetings for the coming months. I understand the need of the Planning Department for their professional staff to have adequate time to work on the General Plan and other major projects feeling that much of our work can be done at the sub -committee level. In my opinion, however, this decision creates an obstacle to the continued growth and development of the SKCDPAC. We currently have six members with three vacancies making it problematic, at times, to produce a quorum. This includes two recently appointed members. Organizationally, more sub -committees need to be developed. Our numbers and a lack of new applications for Committee membership make this unlikely. Sub -committees not only require time for meetings, but more important, time to do individual research and adequately prepare for discussion. We need improved County support in filling current vacancies and a plan to fill future ones. 3 eom�r>I . Q. 53G Ref. To: PI PL Ref. Date DEC 01 02 15 As a Committee member, I am currently working closely with Council Member Wille and the Planning Department in providing community input regarding the County General Plan update/revision. Community involvement is playing a crucial role in developing a plan that includes our respective community's values and vision. The plan, as I understand it, is for the Action Committee to subsequently update/revise our CDP and CIP priority list. This will require adequate staff support. On a related note, Council member Wille has brought up the limitations placed on Action Committees relating to the Sunshine Law. I recognize it is important to follow the law. However, imposing restrictions on an advisory group such as an Action Committee can be frustrating. In the last resort, we are not decision makers. I do not see a matter of limiting the number of people going to a community forum to just observe and learn about issues a problem. We know that those issues can not be discussed between members outside of the meeting process. This barrier can be an obstacle to being informed and effectively participating in the formal discussion at Action Committee meetings. In previous written testimony to the Planning Director and subsequent distribution to the Council regarding the General Plan, I recommended "consideration" of transferring the County support of Action Committees to a newly formed Department or Division of Community Relations. This reorganization likely would require an HR study as well as much discussion by the Council and Administration to determine staffing numbers, cost, and the possibility of reallocation of staff. I offer my past knowledge and professional experience in HR and organizational change in this process. In Summary: My comments are not intended to be of a personal nature relating to the Planning Department. In my opinion, Duane Kanuha and staff continue to show a willingness to listen to my input. It is important that all us work together for the community. The decision to schedule Action Committee meetings bi-monthly for a yet undetermined amount of time is an indication that the Planning Department does not have adequate staffing to support Action Committees including those already in place and others in the development stage. County support for recruiting and filling vacancies on our committee has been less than par. The development of SKCDPAC sub-committees is difficult because of a shortage of members. Improved County staff support in recruitment is needed. The County will rely on Action Committees for further input relating to the General Plan and subsequent revision and updates of CDP's and CIP priority lists. This requires adequate staff support. Continued discussion is needed to determine County analysis and communication with the State in relationship to Sunshine Law restrictions and allowing more flexibility for advisory" Action Committees to attend community sponsored discussion meetings. Community involvement in the democratic process, including the development of CDP Action Committees, is essential regarding current issues and especially long-term challenges. This requires both current and future County Councils and County Administrations to place priority in doing what is necessary to improve and develop Action Committees. The creation of an Office of Community Relations is worth exploring and may play an important role in carrying out this mission. Joel Cohen Member of the South Kohala Community Development Plan Action Committee. cc: John Mueller cc: Duane Kanuha