Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOM 0664.063 2014-2016 Murashige, Laura From: Henry Carson <yippiekayyeh@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 7:47 AM To: Council Testimony Subject: Support for Bill 140 Esteemed Councilmembers, : I am writing to add my support for Bill 140, the EPS foam transition/reduction. I have studied the issue plastic pollution for many years, including several studies on the Big Island. One of our studies demo'ntrated that significant amounts of plastic pollution enter the ocean from Hilo waterways, and that pollution can land nearby, or on "junk beach" at South Point, or can land on other islands in about a week. Polystyrene foam is a particularly troubling part of that pollution because it breaks down into microplastic so quickly and readily. With some other commonly-used products, such as a water bottle, at least there is time to potentially intervene and pick up the bottle (at one of our beach parks for instance) before it breaks down and enters the ecosystem. With disposable foam containers, however, the polymer and associated chemical additives begin to enter the ecosystem almost immediately, with largely unknown consequences that scientists are only now beginning to unravel. With so many viable alternatives to foamed polystyrene available, this bill will have immediate positive impacts with little economic downside. Another immediate impact will be a reduction in plastic additives introduced into the food that often is placed inside the containers, and eventually introduced into the human body. Hot or spicy (acidic) foods are especially good at leaching chemical additives from plastic. Even water, when left too long in a plastic bottle, begins to leach the additives. We don't need science to tell us this; we've all tasted that "plastic" taste in older bottles before. Although I admit that the links between these additives and poor health in humans is not conclusive, the simple truth is that there is no requirement for the additives in EPS to be tested before they are used to contain food. The list of potential additives is so long that health researchers could not possibly keep up and study each one, especially since many potential health effects would build up over years. It took researchers decades to unearth the problems with Bisphenol-A(BPA) and get bans in place. One thing we do know conclusively from the BPA experience is that many plastic additives are not inert, food-safe materials. A much simpler and safer alternative than all the tests and uncertainty would be to switch from using plastics to contain hot or acidic food. I would be happy to discuss these concerns further, however for the sake of brevity I will conclude by simply urging you to pass Bill 140, for both the short-term and long-term health of the island's ecosystems and people. Mahalo, Dr. Hank Carson, PhD Marine Ecology Corium. No. (14.4 Ref. TozG.V . Ref. Date MAY 03 2016 1