HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PSMTC 026 2016/10/19 (2014-2016) REPORT OF THE
COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
AND MASS TRANSIT
DATE: October 19, 2016 Re: Bill No. 240/Comm. No. 1047
PLACE: Council Chambers
Kailua-Kona, Hawai`i
TIME: 9:43 a.m.
Council Chair and Members
Hawai`i County Council
Hilo, Hawai`i 96720
Your Committee on Public Safety and Mass Transit, to which was referred Bill No. 240, reports
as follows:
Bill No. 240, transmitted by Council Member Daniel K. Paleka, Jr., via Comm. No. 1047, dated
September 14, 2016, an ordinance amending Chapter 18, Article 4 of the Hawai`i County Code
1983 (2005 Edition, as amended), by adding a new division relating to the Hele-On Kako`o
complementary paratransit service. Bill No. 240 establishes an eligibility determination process
for paratransit services and the right of the County to suspend paratransit services for eligible
riders if the County finds cause to do so, and further establishes a process to appeal denial or
suspension of service to the Transportation Commission.
Your Committee first heard this matter on September 21, 2016, in the Kona Council Chamber.
At that time, there were no testifiers present for this matter. After the close of public testimony,
Deputy County Clerk Jon Henricks read Comm. No. 1047 into the record, preceding a motion
made by Ms. Eoff, seconded by Mr. Kanuha to recommend passage of Bill 240 on first reading
before the full Council.
During that discussion, Mass Transit Administrator (MTA) Tiffany Kai and Deputy Corporation
Counsel William Brilhante requested the matter be postponed to allow time to clarify language
and ensure compliance with state and federal regulations relating to complementary paratransit
services. Your Committee agreed to postpone this matter to the Call of the Chair.
Via Comm. 1047.1, dated September 29, 2016, Chair Paleka requested this matter be placed on
the October 18, 2016, PSMTC agenda. Given the length of agenda matters, the October 18th
PSMTC meeting convened Wednesday, October 19, 2016 in the Kona Council Chambers. There
were no testifiers present for this matter. After the close of public testimony, Deputy County
Clerk Jon Henricks read Comm. No. 1047 and 1047.1 into the record, preceding a motion made
by Ms. Wille and seconded by Ms. Eoff to refer to Council with a positive recommendation.
Prior to discussion, Mr. Paleka relinquished his Chair duties to Vice Chair Ilagan. Mr. Paleka
then preceded a motion to approve proposed amendments by the contents of Comm. No.1047.3.
Mr. Paleka invited MTA Administrator Kai and Paratransit Specialist Karyle Yamane to explain
reasoning behind proposed amendments. Ms. Yamane explained to Your Committee that the
proposed amendments via Comm. No. 1047.3 is intended to clarify language that may have been
confusing, such as the term "complementary," and to flow nicer and reader friendly. Specific details
PSMTC REPORT NO. 26
PSMTC-26 Page 2 October 19, 2016
provided is for clarity sake, but the content and intent has not been changed, which Your Committee
unanimously voted to approve amendments proposed via Comm. No. 1047.3.
Continuing discussion, Ms. Eoff commends Mr. Paleka and Mass Transit Agency for providing the
County of Hawai`i Mass Transit Agency Hele-On Keiko`o: Riders Guide,transmitted by Council
Member Paleka via Comm.No. 1047.2. Ms. Yamane responded that said guide is available online
and sent to each eligible rider for their information and reference.
Upon request by Mr. Onishi, MTA shared the following update in applicant and ridership numbers:
for applicants, there were 52 in July, 117 in August, 132 in September; current amount of eligible
riders to date is 45, with 15 in Hilo and 30 in Kona. Ms., Yamane explained that at any given
moment MTA has applications pending, but as of now MTA confirms 45 eligible riders with the
highest number of applicants in August. Ms. Yamane continued to explain that there are no
restrictions but an eligibility criteria, which currently on only 1 person deemed inelegible, some are
given temporary or conditional eligibility. Mr. Onishi was assured that MTA does not have an influx
applicants and denied eligibility.
Mr. Ilagan shared concern regarding the appeal process. The appeal process may be a bit encumber
some for persons who are disabled. Ms. Yamane responded regarding proposed suspension of
service before hitting three missed marks, a letter will be sent along with the appeals process
available online and also sent to any person who has applied to the service that is less than
unconditional, so if temporary or denied, MTA will mail the appeal process and form so they are
fully notified about process. The Rider's Guide further explains specifically missed 3 scheduled trips
per quarter, with an up to 2 hours to cancel provided. The reason why the appeals process is in place
is due to the amount of resources expended to provide such service. Mr. Ilagan continued to urge
actually codifying process specifically, so it's clear with minimal to no opportunity to be abused, for
protection for the people.
Your Committee on Public Safety and Mass Transit is in accord with the purpose and intent of
Bill No. 240, as amended to Draft 2, and recommends its passage at first reading.
nm
AYES NOES ABS EX REC Respectfully submitted,
CHUNG X
DAVID x COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
EOFF x AND MASS TRANSIT
ILAGAN X d"
KANUHA X
ONISHI
DANNY PA KA, CHAIR
PALEKA X PSMTC RE ORT NO.: 26
POINDEXTER X ADOPTED: NOV 0 2 2016
WILLE X
AYES—Affirmative;NOES—Negative,ABS—Absent,EX—Excused Absence;REC-Recused