Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN PC 2017/02/21 (2016-2018)Committee on Planning 2nd Session Hawaii County Building 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii February 21, 2017 CALL TO The regular meeting of the Committee on Planning was called to order at ORDER: 1:05 p.m., in the Council Chambers, Hilo, by Ms. Karen Eoff, Chair. R(1T T CAT r Present: Ms. Karen Eoff, Chair Ms. Eileen O'Hara, Vice Chair Mr. Aaron Chung, Member Ms. Maile Medeiros David, Member Mr. Dru Mamo Kanuha, Member Ms. Susan L. K. Lee Loy, Member Ms. Valerie T. Poindexter, Member Mr. Herbert M. "Tim" Richards, III, Member (came in later) Ms. Jennifer Ruggles, Member (came in later) STATEMENTS The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business, FROM THE Statements from the Public on Agenda Items. PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS: The following individuals registered to speak in opposition and to comment on Bill 10 (Comm. 81), and came forward when called by the Chair: Elaine Stephanie Salazar. Russell Doi. COMMUNI- The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business, CATIONS: Communications. (There were none.) ORDER OF The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business, RESOLUTIONS: Order of Resolutions. (There were none.) BILLS FOR The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business, Bills ORDINANCES: for Ordinances. PC -2 CHR. EOFF: Mr. Clerk, can you please read in Bill 10? February 21, 2017 Bill 10: AMENDS ORDINANCE NO. 12-111 WHICH AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 99-116 WHICH AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 96-159 WHICH AMENDED SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP), ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2016 EDITION, AS AMENDED) (formerly referred to as Section 25-114, City of Hilo Zone Map, Article 3, Chapter 25, Zoning Code), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL — 10,000 SQUARE FEET (RS -10) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL — 7,500 SQUARE FEET (CN -7.5) AT WAIAKEA, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEYS: 2-2-044:003, 031,032, 035, AND 037 (Applicant: Rhodes Moore, LLC (formerly Graphic Images Hawaii, Inc.)) (Area: 322,414 square feet) The Windward Planning Commission forwards its favorable recommendation for amendments to Conditions C, G, and Q of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 12-111, which would: 1) Grant a time extension to secure final subdivision approval; 2) Modify the timing of installing drainage improvements; and 3) Reduce the fair share contribution provision for this assisted living facility. Reference: Comm. 81 Intr. by: Ms. Eoff (B/R) Motion to Approve: Ms. O'Hara moved to recommend passage of Bill 10 on first reading. Seconded by Ms. David. CHR. EOFF: Council Members, we do have John Dewalt, a representative of the applicant and Thomas Yeh, the applicant's attorney here in the Chambers in Kona, and I believe there may be somebody from the Planning Department in Hilo, but I can't see them at this time. I'm going to ask the applicant's representatives to please come forward. (Note: At this time, John Dewalt Developer and Thomas Yeh Attorney came forward to address the members of the Committee.) CHR. EOFF: And you have provided us additional handout material but would either one of you like to go first and state your name and give any kind of background you can provide at this time? MR. YEH: Sure, I'd be happy to. Thank you, madam Chair and members of the Council. Good afternoon. Basically, what we have provided to you and maybe if you can take a look at those handouts, it will give you kind of a site orientation. So the first is a tax map and you will see where the subject property is which is at the corner of East Kahaopea and Kanoelehua Avenue. The previous testifier, you can see there's a little bit of an irregular shaped parcel that's along Kanoelehua, Page 2 PC -2 February 21, 2017 that's where their parcel is. And then you can see along Kanoelehua there's what's called easement `A', which is approximately 25' wide road easement, access easement. They're not actually using that access, they've been using actually another driveway location that's further east at the owner's permission. This is land court property From a real practical standpoint, that easement itself is really not a safe location. It was created when these lots were created back when and before all the development occurred along the highway. And so from our perspective, we have been in discussion with them to be able to provide them an alternative access, along with an emergency access, which I will get to in a moment. But from our understanding, the Department of Public Works had just recently indicated that they're not really inclined to give them access along that location anyway, just because of the safety issues. Not one that's created necessarily by this project, but by the fact that you will have traffic coming off of Kanoelehua and turning right, and that's just not a good location. Similarly, coming out of that location to come on to Kahaopea is also not a safe location. So if you take a look now at the next diagram which is your color sheet site plan, that's what the current layout of this project is, and it'll be a good opportunity for me to also explain this property in relation to some of the drainage issues that have been discussed. So if we take a look at the site plan, and we take a look at Mr. Doi and Ms. Salazar's property to the right hand side, one of the key proposals that we provided to them is to be able to utilize the access that you see here, to come out through the property and go on to the main driveway, which we feel is a much better location for them, from a safety perspective. Now in times of flooding, we do acknowledge that this property has its challenges. And basically, if you were to take a look at the right hand side of the map, you have some of the East Palai stream location that skirts around this property and comes out on the East Kahaopea, almost across from Awapuhi Street. From a development perspective, we're not allowed, the applicant's not allowed to change that flow either in terms of velocity, location with their depth from where it exits the property. That's a given. Neither the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), County Codes, nor common law allows that water, in times of heavy rain, to be changed at that location. So what the process is basically, as I understand and Mr. Dewalt will explain a little bit more, is that the current FEMA maps are actually not quite accurate in and of themselves. But to accommodate this site there are some adjustments on the property, but where it exits the property will remain the same. That's where we come in with this time extension request that we requested because the current deadline is August of this year. In order to get to this final approval from the Federal Management Agency as well as the County, you have Page 3 PC -2 February 21, 2017 to go through a two-step process. One is to get a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) to discuss the drainage improvements that will accommodate this site as well as the project. And then once those improvements are done, get a final letter of map revision. That process through the respective agencies is the time consuming one. So we're asking for basically a five-year time extension from August of this year to get this accomplished before a certificate of occupancy is even issued for this building. So, all of these agencies need to approve that design and the actual final construction approval before any occupancy or that kind of thing takes place. Speaking of an emergency access now, discussions that we have had with Ms. Salazar is to provide another possible access where—you see the parking near the commercial element along the corner? That would really only be used in the event that area, that main common driveway has water. The water recedes there rather quickly. We didn't create the problem, we're trying to accommodate and adjust to it. From an overall perspective, this property has been undeveloped, vacant, and not the sightliest place for a number of years. From an economic use standpoint, we believe that this provides a really good opportunity from the standpoint of providing a highly needed assisted living facility location in Hilo, for East Hawaii residents. I just visited the Pohai Nani facility on Oahu, you've seen ads there. Very similar kind of accommodations, but here we have a situation where people from East Hawaii are moving there. We're basically splitting up families, so we're hoping that this can provide a badly needed accommodation for East Hawaii. John, did you want to say more about the flooding? MR. DEWALT: One of the key issues for the extension is CHR. EOFF: Excuse me, could you just introduce yourself first? MR. DEWALT: I'm sorry, my name is John Dewalt, I'm with Rhodes Moore, I'm a principal there, I'm the developer for the project. I reside in Encinitas, California. I just want to give you a little more about the background with regard to the flood zone issues. When we originally started designing this project, the FEMA map had, where you see our exit onto the side road, it's actually not on the flood plain according to FEMA, but realistically it was. During the middle of our design process, they changed their updated their flood map and put that road now in the flood plain, which requires us to go through FEMA if we have any kind of driveways or anything like that built in that area to be approved through that conditional letter process. As our engineers went through that conditional letter process, our understanding is that the current FEMA map is wrong too, in terms of the actual places where the flooding goes, and there are some other issues with that flood plain. Page 4 PC -2 February 21, 2017 So we submitted a plan to clean up some of those problems and restructure that flood plain map. We'll be maintaining the storage capabilities of the property and the flow rates, etc. across the road. There may be some improvements to a little bit of the upstream properties, but we really can't do anything based on those constraints of flow rates and timing and stuff to help the downstream properties. So the process is going through FEMA, both through County Engineering as well as the Federal Emergency Management Association. That agency—that will be going on through the spring. Once we have the conditional letter approved, then we will be able to actually build the improvements. Once the improvements are done, then we'll have to go back, provide a submittal for the final letter of approval, which we'll have to have in place before we can do the occupancy. MR. YEH: A couple of areas that I wanted to kind of supplement information on is the third sheet handout that you were provided. It's a depiction of the improvements to the intersection that will be provided by the applicant. And really, it actually is not—based on the traffic impact analysis, it was felt that these improvements would help more the employee traffic scenario and additions. So right now, as you come out of Kahaopea and you turn onto Kanoelehua, you're just going to have two lanes, one that goes straight, left, or right. The plan is to put in a turning—left turn turning pocket onto Kanoelehua, a left turn turning pocket onto Awapuhi Street, and then having a left -turn pocket into the common driveway. The other two areas that we're seeking basically adjustment on in terms of the ordinances, deals with the fair share issues, both from a parks and traffic impact standpoint. The residents there are really not going to be creating traffic impacts in and of themselves, nor will they be creating park impacts. Onsite, there will be memory -care gardens, recreational facilities, walking paths, and interestingly enough, when we took a look at some of the Blue -Zones related concepts that the County has adopted by policy, we had a discussion with Carol Ignacio and she suggested and provided us with certain guidelines. And it's kind of coincidental because some of the design landscape that we're doing with Leonard Bisel as well as the architect, really incorporates walking paths of different kinds of levels for people with different capabilities. Garden areas and these quiet locations, serene locations as well as gardening opportunities so we're really happy to look at those guidelines and try to incorporate those into the project. That has something to do with the fair share issue to some extent too because most of these residents will have come from East Hawaii. They will have paid their property taxes and developed the things that are there now in East Hawaii, so we really feel from an impact standpoint, those are the two areas that we would like some adjustment on. In terms of the parks, fire, and solid waste fair share, it's not a problem, we're willing to pay that because those are certainly basic Page 5 PC -2 February 21, 2017 services that this project will need. But we're open to any questions at this time. Thank you. CHR. EOFF: Thank you, sir. Council Members, discussion? Ms. Lee Loy. MS. LEE LOY: Hi. Aloha, Mr. Yeh. This is in my district and that flooding really is an issue. And so what I can see is through condition H, you guys are going to be doing the drainage improvements which requires the LOMR (Letter of Map Revision), and I was just wondering what the timing element for that is because I know that to be a very long and exhaustive process. MR. YEH: Very good question, Ms. Lee Loy. You know, five years is actually a pretty tight timeline. We were thinking about not necessarily asking for more, but asking for the ability, as we often see in zoning ordinances for the Planning Department, to provide some authority to provide an administrative time extension if we really run into issues at that point. And we'd be very happy if the Council would consider something like that in the way of an adjustment to what's on the table now. From a timeframe, maybe John, you can explain. MR. DEWALT: So the process—we will start our construction documents, etc. Once this is approved and the CLOMR is approved and the subdivision map is approved, that will probably be sometime this summer. The permitting process will probably take nine months to a year and then the construction process will probably take about 18 months. During that construction process, the first thing that will be done will be the flood zone improvements. Then after that, we'd start working on the LOMR process. MR. YEH: Now he's speaking from Mainland experience. So I got to say that's an optimistic timeline, I'll say. CHR. EOFF: Mr. Yeh? MR. YEH: Yes, ma'am. CHR. EOFF: Because somebody's recording minutes, could you just say your name before you speak? MR. YEH: Oh, thank you. CHR. EOFF: Thank you. Just to identify who's doing MR. YEH: I was going to say that may be an optimistic perspective from a Mainland point of view. Things in Hawaii do move more slowly. So any accommodation you could provide would be helpful. Page 6 PC -2 February 21, 2017 CHR. EOFF: Okay. Thank you. MR. YEH: Not necessarily that we're going to need it, but to have it would be great. MS. LEE LOY: And then the other piece is that I see you have a surety bond for the drainage improvements. Can you elaborate on that surety bond and what you folks are bonding as far as infrastructure? MR. YEH: Good question. See, the processes that we need to go through are going through CLOMR and getting approval. In order to get plan approval, technically you got to finish subdivision approval because you can't have plan approval for properties that cross boundaries. So the main thrust of what we need to do here from a subdivision standpoint, is consolidate boundaries so that we're not crossing boundaries with the facility themselves. So you've got this subdivision approval process, plan approval, getting building permits, again have to be for an existing parcel, not two or three different ones. So the idea behind the surety bond is you bond all the improvements, including the drainage improvements, to be able to get the final subdivision approval where you take all the various estimated cost of doing the drainage in the subdivision. You provide a cashier's check or letter of credit, or a surety bond to the County, which doesn't get released until all of those improvements are done. And in this case here, also under the use permit that was issued by the Planning Commission for this project, no certificate of occupancy can be issued to the ALF (Assisted Living Facility) facility until everything has been done and that bond is released. So there are a number of safeguards in place to make sure that whatever drainage improvements, etc. are required, will in fact be done before certificate of occupancy. That doesn't necessarily affect the commercial segment on the corner because that's out of the area that we're discussing. MS. LEE LOY: One more question. CHR. EOFF: Is your mic on? MS. LEE LOY: Last question. You talked about the flow, I think we're atAE is our flow rate. Is that one to three feet velocity? MR. YEH: I'm not an engineer either, all I know is that the engineers need the design to make sure that what exits—that property is not changed from what it exists now. MS. LEE LOY: Okay. And so you're doing the work with Public Works, the individuals, the engineers that would actually ensure that the water flow is being maintained and that— Page 7 PC -2 February 21, 2017 MR. YEH: Not adversely MS. LEE LOY: Not adversely affecting and then the drainage improvements that you folks are providing are being bonded, right? MR. YEH: Correct. And whatever—so you have existing flow that flows onto and off the property, and you can have flow that is generated by the development itself, which is additional. That flow needs to be accommodated onsite through proper drywells and drainage improvements, yes. And the same thing for what else gets bonded also, sidewalks, curbs, and gutters and some of the other traffic improvements that we're talking about. MS. LEE LOY: Those sidewalk improvements, they will occur on the, I guess it's the MR. YEH: Frontage of that property. MS. LEE LOY: Frontage of the property. Does it hook up to the next subdivision? I believe they have some— MR. YEH: I don't believe it does go all the way down. MR. DEWALT: No, there's an extra property in between our property and those homes. MS. LEE LOY: Okay. CHR. EOFF: Mr. Dewalt, can you state your name when you do start speaking? MR. DEWALT: I'm sorry, John Dewalt. CHR. EOFF: Thank you. Okay, other questions, Council Members? Mr. Richards. MR. RICHARDS: Good afternoon. Question—we keep coming back to this flooding concern and I'm very sensitive to that. I mean Hilo is Hilo and we all understand that, but I'm also very sensitive to Mr. Doi and Ms. Salazar's being neighbors and being affected. I've read the transcript of the Windward Planning meeting and it makes reference to some options that were put forth. I'm still puzzled on the drainage. I know we've been discussing it here some, but could you clarify that again, walk me through that once again, please? MR. YEH: And I'm not quite sure what's being referenced, but their property, which is on the right hand side of the tax map or the site plan—as I understand, the East Palai stream water does come across a portion of their property on the Page 8 PC -2 February 21, 2017 back side. It then skirts around that corner and we're not going to be changing it. In fact, I think—John, maybe you can explain and introduce yourself, about how their property might be improved actually by some of these— MR. DEWALT: This is John again. The stream, as it goes—comes in probably in the middle of that page where you see green areas, and then comes just past the west side of their property. Where you see our building out there is currently a peninsula of high land where our building is on, so it kind of goes up to the west a little bit, including the adjacent property there and it comes back around that large green area, which is a large flood area. What we'll be doing in our improvements, is adding some depth to that to create some additional volume to make sure we don't release more than we're supposed to. And taking a few—there's a few constraints right there where our building kind of points to the west. Just west of our building there's a little bit of a constraint there, we've been clearing that up as part of the process so that actually, some of the properties to the south of us may see a little bit less flooding as we're going to direct that water to the bigger basin, the northeast side of our property. We will not, at this point in time, the engineering group has not asked us to replace the culvert that's there on the side road. If we replaced the culvert with a larger culvert, what happens is our property will see less flooding but the water will go more quickly to the property south of us and create more flooding sooner there. And FEMA's rules won't allow us to do that. MR. YEH: And we have been in discussion the—this is Tom Yeh, have been in discussion with the owner with the—that's on the top of the page and they're working with us in coordination with respect to that flood drainage work, the Chock family. MR. RICHARDS: Okay. And I appreciate that and I do conceptually, I like the idea again for all things to have been articulated, but again, being sensitive to the neighbors. Have you sit down and had the talk stories with Mr. Doi and Ms. Salazar? MR. YEH: Yes, we have. In fact, around the time that we filed—actually prior to the filing time, we actually sent out a notice to everybody within 500 feet of this area. We gave notice before and actually had a community meeting, and interestingly enough, at least at that time, only Ms. Salazar and Mr. Doi showed up. We've been talking to them since day one. MR. RICHARDS: Okay. Thank you. MR. YEH: Thank you. Page 9 PC -2 February 21, 2017 CHR. EOFF: Ms. David. And by the way, I believe that there's some people from maybe the Planning Department in Hilo now. Looks like it. MS. DAVID: Thank you, Chair Eoff Aloha, Mr. Yeh and Mr. Dewalt. Thank you. I just have a few questions regarding the recommendations from the Planning Commission and department. The CLOMR and LOMR are being recommended in that report that it be done, and as far as I can understand it, it's a two-step process. The CLOMR comes first and then before you folks do the actual work, and once you do that, you submit it back to DPW (Department of Public Works) and FEMA and then they come up with the final LOMR. Okay. That I understand and I think that is a long process. And then I'm looking on Condition G now in the bill and it states, "If required by the Department of Public Works, the applicant shall construct any necessary drainage improvements ..." So I'm reading the recommendations from the Planning Department as any time a developer alters or replaces special flood, they must do these things. And then on the condition it says, "If required by the Department ...," I have aI was wondering what that meant. MR. YEH: And I can explain that. MS. DAVID: Thank you. MR. YEH: You know, the zoning ordinance is not necessarily development specific, right? So, if for instance, there was nothing that occurred there, then you wouldn't necessarily trigger some of these issues. But to the extent that you have development occurring within this area of drainage, then that's when you get these requirements in. And the LOMR is because, as Mr. Dewalt explained, in order to deal with that site and make the flow in that situation better, then we will need to go get a letter of map revision, we can't change that without going through that FEMA process. Under the use permit, which is a more specific approval of the application for the assisted living facility, there's a clear direction that we get that approval. MS. DAVID: And so the concerns that Ms. Salazar expressed when she—about the flooding and the pictures that she provided, is that the subject property that's going to be developed? MR. YEH: You know, it may be portions of it. You know, whether it'll look like that once these improvements are done, that's another question. MS. DAVID: Yeah, because I'm thinking that if what you're planning to do will resolve what Ms. Salazar has pointed out as far as the flooding in that area, and it resolves that issue as far as flooding, it seems like there is flooding, and so Page 10 PC -2 February 21, 2017 MR. DEWALT: This is John Dewalt. I think, just to kind of clarify things, the primary reason we're having to do a CLOMR—initially we didn't need to do a CLOMR, our entrance, the main entrance and the County recommended location entrance down across from the cross street is an ideal way from a traffic perspective. However, it's down where it floods. Originally, that wasn't in the FEMA flood plain because the FEMA flood plain was an error. When they changed it, they put that in the flood plain because we're putting a driveway there. We need to go through the CLOMR process and demonstrate any changes we're making don't affect the flooding. Our building and the rest of the parking and stuff is well above the flood plain, so the flood plain is still there, it will still flood. But we're trying to make some improvements to make sure there's adequate storage by making the basin a little bit bigger and mitigate for the driveway, because the driveway will take up a little bit of space and reduces the storage. So we're digging some other areas and we'll create more storage in that area. MS. DAVID: Okay. Well, I just needed some clarification on that because— MR. YEH: This is Tom. We're not necessarily in the position to resolve issues for people that are downstream. I mean that is a situation that has existed, does exist, and we can't—we're really not in a position to change that. If we did, we'd have a huge sink hole on the property MS. DAVID: I understand that— MR. YEH: Where the water is going down. All we can try to do is MS. DAVID: Minimize what you do on your MR. YEH: Accommodate what's there on site, adjust for the facility and make sure that nobody downstream gets affected any differently than they are now. That's a basic theme of concept that we have. MS. DAVID: Right. I understand that. So the condition that it will just do a LOMR as opposed to a CLOMR and LOMR in the conditions, you are just going to do a Letter of Map Revision? MR. YEH: Correct. MR. DEWALT: This is John again. Originally, we would just need to do a LOMR after we finish construction, demonstrating that we didn't affect the flood area. But because our driveway now is in the flood area, we have to do the CLOMR first for FEMA to approve that plan, and then a LOMR afterwards to demonstrate that we followed the plan. Page 11 PC -2 February 21, 2017 MS. DAVID: That's what I was wondering and that wasn't in the conditions, so that was my question. And whether it should be is my other question. Thank you for explaining that and that's all I have. Mahalo. CHR. EOFF: Any other comments, Council Members, or questions? MS. O'HARA: Chair? CHR. EOFF: Yes. Ms. O'Hara. MS. O'HARA: Thank you, gentlemen for being here and thank you Mr. Yeh for calling ahead. Is Daryn Arai in the Chambers in Hilo? CHR. EOFF: Yes, he is. MS. O'HARA: Daryn, could you come forward? (Note: At this time, Daryn Arai Planning Program Manager came forward to address the members of the Committee.) MS. O'HARA: I'm familiar with this area and it does flood and it's not just the subject property. There is a future river coming down the mountain side there and at some point, it's going to make itself known to us. But it is an area of great flooding and they can do only so much on this property to prevent flooding, but it's definitely not impacting further south or further down the flood plain. But what they're doing, from what I can tell, is going to be adequate to adjust the flow on this property, and their obligation is to keep the water onsite through drywells and that sort of thing. But it's not going to solve the problem of flooding in that area, which is a much bigger problem. So I was going to ask Mr. Arai if he felt that their measures that they're going to be introducing are adequate for the development. I know it's probably not going to change the fact that area is prone to flooding. MR. ARAI: Good afternoon, Chairperson Eoff and members of the committee, my name is Daryn Arai with the Planning Department. To address Council Member O'Hara's question, because we're at the zoning level, we are looking at a proposal that is really at the conceptual stage. What will happen now, is should this amendment be approved, you'll allow the landowner or developer to proceed forward with the necessary civil engineering work, which would include the necessary design and calculations to accommodate any onsite drainage that is generated, and then adequately disposed of onsite as well. Regarding the floodway, the intent is not, as Mr. Yeh mentioned, not to add to the volume or the direction of the flow. But simply, any additional onsite drainage Page 12 PC -2 February 21, 2017 generated shall be disposed onsite and not contribute to the overall direction and volume of the floodway. I hope I answered your question. MS. O'HARA: Yes, thank you. CHR. EOFF: Ms. Lee Loy. MS. LEE LOY: Aloha, Mr. Arai, it's Sue Lee Loy. I had a question specifically to those drainage improvements and moving forward with the engineering work. My understanding is they have five years to get this CLOMR and then the LOMR and then the FEMA maps revised. Is there a ministerial piece that they would have an opportunity to have, a ministerial time extension, just because some of these things are out of the developers control with the different agencies? MR. ARAI: The draft bill does not include a provision for administrative time extensions, so should they not satisfy the requirements within the five-year timeframe, they would have to appear back before the Council. MS. LEE LOY: A follow-up question, Mr. Arai. For the use permit attached to this subject application, is there a timing element for that also in the use permit? MR. ARAI: In my rush to get over here, I just grabbed the rezoning file and not the use permit file. Normally, we do embed the privilege about administrative time extension in most use permits, and I would have expected we'd have done likewise with the assisted living facility, but I'm just doing that off the top of my head. I'll try to verify it for you. MS. LEE LOY: Thank you. MR. YEH: Ms. Lee Loy? CHR. EOFF: Mr. Yeh. MR. YEH: My apologies, this is Tom Yeh. Yes, the use permit does have an administrative time extension on top of the standard time approval also. Yes, it's similar to what you were discussing. CHR. EOFF: Okay. Thank you. Any other comments or questions, Council Members? No? Okay, then seeing none, I'll go ahead and thank you for being here and answering these questions and we'll look forward to any other assurances or comments you can provide at the first reading at Council as well. Page 13 PC -2 February 21, 2017 Vote on 'Ihe motion to recommend passage of Bill 10 on first Bill 10: reading was carried by the following voice vote: (Approved) Ayes: Committee Members Chung, David, Kanuha Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles and Chair Eoff - 9. Noes: None. Absent: None. Excused: None. ADJOURN There being no further business, at 1:49 p.m.. Ms. David moved to adjourn the MENT: meeting. Seconded by Ms. Poindexter and carried by the following voice vote: Ayes: Committee Members Chung, David, Kanuha, Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles, and Chair F.off 9. Noes: None, Absent: None. Excused: None. CHR. EOFF: Our meeting's adjourned. Approved: ' Ms. Karen Eotf, Chair Planning Committee KE/jm MAR 07 2017 (Date) Page 14