Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PC 288 02/08/1988 1984-1988 , 410 - REPORT OF THE 411 COMMITTEE ON PLANNING DATE: February 8, 1988 Re: Comm. 1462 PLACE: Councilroom TIME: 1: 30 p.m. _ Chairman and Members Hawaii County Council Hilo, Hawaii 96720 • Your Committee on Planning, -to which was referred Bill No. 485 , regarding the rezoning request of Ernest Sakamoto, Kalaoa, North Kona, Hawaii , TMK: 7-3-05 :86 , reports as follows: Bill No. 485 amends Section 25-87 , Article 3, Chapter 25 of the Hawaii County Code, by changing the district classification of 6 .606 acres of land from Unplanned (U) to Single Family Residential (RS-10) . • The State Land Use Boundary Map is being amended as per Ordinance 86-126 , which establishes procedures for the County to amend State Land Use boundaries of properties of fifteen acres or less , except those lands within the Conservation District . Ordinance 86-126 also allows the simultaneous processing of boundary amendment with other land use amendments and permits . The applicant plans to subdivide the subject property into 21 residential lots . The property is located adjacent to the Kona Palisades Subdivision. According to the Planning Department, historic sites and archaeological features are present on the property; therefore, the applicant will be required to implement the recommendations of the archaeologist who conducted a reconnaissance survey of the property. The General Plan designates the property as Extensive • Agricultural/Alternate Urban Expansion. The State Land Use district classification is Agricultural . The Kona Regional Plan designates the area for residential use. The zoning is -presently Unplanned (U) . Water and other essential utilities and services are readily available to the subject property. PC REPORT NO �sY2.8-8-.. • ADOPTED ' _ F E�, 7_� a 411 • PC- 288 Page 2 February 8, 1988 amended the bill to include the following Committee has statement regarding the proposed Unified Impact Fees Ordinance: SECTION 3. Should the council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for the imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein may, at the developer ' s election, be satisfied by performance in accordance with the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance . Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the intent and purpose of Bill No. 485, Draft 2, and recommends that it pass first reading. • TAKASHI DOMINGO, CH RMAN "id" EXCUSED)(ABSENT & Il '; SP'N E' r . SCHUTTE, VICE CHR. FRANK DE LUZ III, MEMBER 0.0 / SHERWOOD R. H. GREENWELL, MEMB R OR-' INE R. J ' AKU-IN• MEP :ER (ABSENT & EXCUSED) ttitl„ RUSSELL S. KOKUBUN, MEMBER MER K. LAI, EMB 6' LA/TN