Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PC 243 09/21/1987 1984-1988 REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON PLANNING • DATE: September 21 , 1987 Re: C-1260 PLACE : C oun ci l r oom TIME: 1 :30 p .m . Chairman and Members Hawaii County Council Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Your Committee on Planning, to which was referred Bill No . 414 , regarding the rezoning request of Frank De Luz III and Joseph Arbles , Kaumana , South Hilo , Hawaii , TMK: 2-5-02 :22 , reports as follows: Bill No . 414 amends Section 25-114 , Article 3 , Chapter 25 of the Hawaii County Code , by changing the district classification of approximately 6 .215 acres of land from Agricultural (A-20a ) to Agricultural (A-1a ) . Councilman Frank De Luz informed your Committee that he owns a 50% interest in the subject property . Committee Chairman Takashi Domingo informed Councilman De Luz that he will not be allowed to vote on this matter . The subject property fronts Kaumana Drive and is located mauka of Kaumana Estates Subdivision . The applicant plans to subdivide the property into six 1-acre lots and construct single family dwellings on three of the six lots . The General Plan designates the area as Orchards/Alternate Urban Expansion . The Hilo Community Development Plan recommends retention of the A-20a zoning designation . The State Land Use Commission classifies the land as Agricultural . The Land Study Bureau 's overall master productivity rating for agricultural use is Class "E" or Very Poor . The property is not classified according to the Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH ) system . The Department of Agriculture stated, "According to the application , there is no existing agricultural use of the parcel and the applicants are not creating smaller agricultural lots but residential lots . If the intent of the change of zone is to provide lots that are residential in nature, this would be violative of Section 205-2 of the Hawaii Revised Statutes which requires that any dwellings constructed on the proposed lots be accessory to an agricultural activity . " PC REPORT N0 , 243 ADOPTED : OCT 7 1987 r _ • • 1 r PC- 243 Page 2 September 21 , 1987 Councilman Russell Kokubun asked Norman Hayashi of the Planning Department as to whether or not the applicant was advised that a Residential and Agricultural zone designation would be a more appropriate designation for the subject property . Mr . Hayashi replied in the negative and added that they simply processed the application as submitted by the applicant . Councilman Kokubun inquired as to whether the department has developed a procedure to use the authority the counties now have to unilaterally change State Land Use designations involving properties 15 acres or smaller . Mr . Hayashi replied that they do . Councilman Kokubun asked whether the department has a procedure for advising applicants who may wrongfully apply for an Agriculture (A-la ) zoning when a Residential and Agricultural (RA-1 ) zoning would be a more appropriate designation . Mr . Hayashi stated that they have not as yet developed such a procedure . Mr . Kokubun informed Mr . Hayashi that the proper procedure would have been to redesignate the State Land Use designation to Rural or Urban because the subject property is classified as Very Poor for agricultural use; is not classified by the Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii system; the applicant has stated that he plans to create residential lots and not agricultural lots and the Department of Agriculture has stated that if the intent of the rezoning is to create residential lots , this would, as mentioned earlier , be in violation of Sec. 205-2, HRS . Councilman Kokubun added that the County should have used its authority to change the State Land Use designation because the County has always contended that it should be given more home rule and that the Land Use Commission is unnecessary because the counties are now capable of planning and implementing their own land use policies . As suggested by Committee Chairman Takashi Domingo , your Committee has amended Bill 414 to add the following statement to the condition involving the granting of time extension: "if the applicant should require an additional extension of time , the Planning Director shall submit the applicant 's request to the County Council for appropriate action ." r � � • !II , . PC-243 Page 3 September 21 , 1987 Your Committee on Planning is in accord with the intent and purpose of Bill No . 414 , Draft 2 , and recommends that it pass first reading . Note: Underscoring is used in this committee report only and will not appear in Draft 2 of Bill No . 414 . vC1,411444,. TAKASHI DOMINGO, CHA MAN (Mr. De Luz declared a conflict of / ) interest and abstained from voting) SPENCER K. SCHUTTE, VICE CHR. FRANK DE LUZ III, MEMBER 'tel ./ 1-- 740,87 ROBERT N. HERKES, MEMBER •RRA NE R. J HAKU-IN YE, MEMBER a.Dtl�-. AAA-11J' 5. a(---- • , ex air ir 4 RUSSELL S. KOKUBUN, MEMBERM LE K. LAI , MEMB. R LA/TN