HomeMy WebLinkAboutREP PC 155 09/23/1986 1984-1988 •
OFFICE INFORMATION ONLY
Meeting: October 1, 1986
Action: Bill referred back to Planning Department;. see letter filed
in back of Report.
NOTE: See withdrawal of request by developer (C-532. 45) .
Re: PC Rept. 155
411 REPORT OF THE w
COMMITTEE ON PLANNING
DATE: September 23 , 1986
PLACE: Kona Imin Center , Holualoa
TIME: 7 :00. p.m.
Chairman and Members
Hawaii County Council
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
Your Committee on Planning, to which was referred Bill No. 221,
Draft 2, regarding the rezoning request of Waiono Meadows Ranch,
Ltd. , North Kona, Hawaii , TMK: 7-6-01: 1, 7-6-02 : 1 and 14 and
7-5-15 : 2 and 12, reports as follows:
The property involved is located above Holualoa Village, mauka of
Mamalahoa Highway. The proposed development will include 106 3-acre
sized residential-agricultural lots in the lower portion of the
property along with a 60-acre equestrian center and a 167-acre
ranching and trail-riding area. The remaining 1,161 acres will be
used for ranching.
According to the Planning Department, there is no complete drainage
system in the area of the proposed development to handle flood
waters. The property is located in the upper portions of the Waiaha,
Horseshoe Bend and Holualoa School streams , all of which pass through
the subject property. All three of the streams have caused property
damage during previous storms because the streambeds are not deep
enough to contain flood waters.
Your Committee held a public hearing on the proposed development in
Holualoa on August 11 , 1986 . A number of individuals who reside
below the proposed subdivision testified in opposition to the
development . Their opposition was based largely on the fear that the
development will aggravate flooding conditions.
Your Committee agreed with the developer that Conditions H and J of
Bill 221 should be amended. The amendments are reflected in Draft 2
of the bill .
Draft 2 of Bill 221 passed first reading of the County Council on
September 3 , 1986 and was recommitted to the Planning Committee for
further discussion, as per recommendation of the committee.
Your Committee met on September 8 , 1986 , in Waimea , at which time
several individuals who reside in the vicinity of the proposed
development again testified in opposition to Bill 221. After all of
the testimonies were heard, Councilman Spencer Schutte moved that
further action on the bill be deferred to give committee members more
time to study the bill .
PC REPORT No , 155
ADOPTED:
PC -155 Page 2 September 23, 1986
Your Committee met again on September 23, 1986, in Holualoa, Kona, at
which time testimonies in opposition to the development were again
heard from individuals residing in the vicinity of the proposed
development.
Representatives of the development also testified in an effort to
respond to some of the questions and concerns of individuals opposing
the development.
Your Committee on Planning is not in accord with the intent and
purpose of Bill No. 221, Draft 2, and recommends its denial.
A
TAKASHI DOMINGO, CHAIRMAN
SVENCER K. 8CHUTTE, VICE CHR.
Ll----
Rmn�
LA/TN
(ABSENT & EXCUSED)
FRANK DE LUZ III, MEMBER
0
JNZY OF Hq�y'•••
•
•
STEPHEN K. YAMASHIROj,,.1.41.44
T..- • ,� JAMES L. K. DAHLBERG
Chairman&Presiding Officer *;/ <�/ +• ;*; FRANK DE LUQ III
SPENCER KALANI SCHUTTE •: __ , TAKASHI DOMINGO
Vice Chairman �TqT,H M°:;P`::` ROBERT N. HERKES
'•••.•.,..,_.. LORRAINE R.JI`I'CHAKII-INOUYE
RUSSELL S. KOKUBUN
COUNTY COUNCIL MERLE K. LAI
Council Members
County of Hawaii
Hawaii County Building
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
In Reply Refer
October 2, 1986 To: C-679
•
TO: Planning Director A. L. Lyman
FROM: County Clerk R. B. Legaspi.(4
RE: Bill 221 - Rezoning Request of Waiono Meadows Ranch
The applicant, Mr. Steve Zuckerman, through his
attorney, has opt to withdraw' Bill No. 221 from the Council
further deliberations. As such., we are returning the Bill
to your department,
It was pointed out that a reapplication of this
rezoning request is not prohibited, however, the- drainage
concerns, the major reason for the Council 's opposition,
must be addressed and changed before any future review- by
the Council would be considered.
I am attaching for your information, a copy of the
withdrawal letter from Mr. Roy Y. Takeyama, Attorney for
Waiono Meadows Ranch.
Att.
.
•
TAKEYAMA SULLIVAN& SULLIVA
Telephone: •
__.� Attorneys at Law -ROY Y. TAKEYAMA'
(808) 526-2416 - Century Square, Suite 3404 JAN NAOE SULLIVAN
. 1188 Bishop Street •
°A Law Cocoporauoa
Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
.
September 25, 1986 . . -
I
.
Mr- Steve Yamashiro .
Chairman _
County Council
• 'County of Hawaii . .
Hilo, Hawaii 96720
•
Re: Rezoning Request of Ma fano Meadows Ranch •
(Bill No. 221)
Dear .Chaff rman Yamashiro and '
• members of the Council :
. We respectfully request that the above-entitled rezoning request
be withdrawn for the reasons cited hereinbelow:
As you are . aware, it has been .over 2_-years since we filed our .
rezoning request. - It has been Tong and arduous but • we -feel that
- the process was proper and- democratic. - The reason for taking so '
long to process this application was because of the concerns
expressed by the community regarding' the -drainage, problem 'and our-
. attempt to adequately meet these concerns:- • -
We amended our rezoning request twice and 'changed our land use
. • plan 6 times to reflect what we thought was .a -- plan that was e
workable- and met the concerns of - the community.
•
We asked the community to form an Ad Hoc -Committee -so- we could
use it as a sounding board and to communicate to the community
what progress has been made. Many meetings were held with the Ad
Hoc. Committee and with the community but it is obvious that we
were not able_to dispel the concerns expressed by the -community.
It is also quite obvious that 'in• spite of our concerted effort to
accommodate every, reasonable, articulated drainage suggestions ,
it appears that we were not able- to dispel the perceived' drainage
concerns and fears of. the Ad Hoc Committee and a number of area •
residents . This , we regret , for we sincerely believed that the
proposed plan would have alleviated- the existing drainage - and -
flooding conditions of -the the area... The proposed drainage plan ,- as
you know, was recommended by -R.M. -Towill -Corporation, one of the
foremost drainage engineers in the State and supported by the -
Hawaii County Department of Public Works.
The Applicant ,. Mr. - Steve Zuckerman, is an honest - and reputable
developer. He has an ongoing cattle operations - and equestrian
•
center on the Subject site and 'wants to continue being. a good
neighbor and be a part of - the Holuaioa Community. Be is very
sensitive to the concerns of the ..Holualoa Community.
COMM. NO..--
To; Council
r '
•
Steve Yamashiro
Chairman
Page Two
September 25, 1986 •
As such, and in light of your Committee on Planning 's
recommendation to deny our rezoning request, we hereby request
that . the rezoning application be withdrawn from further
consideration.
We truly appreciate the efforts of the Mayor, the Department of
Planning, the Department of Public Works, the County Council, and
the community for giving us an opportunity to present our views
regarding the drainage plan, and for expending so much time and
effort on this matter . .A tough decision had to be made by this
honorable body and we accept the decision of the Committee on
Planning.
For the foregoing reasons , we request that our rezoning request
be withdrawn.
Sincerely. yours
7
ROY Y. KEYAMA •
Attorney for
Waiono Meadows Ranch
RYT/my
' •cc: Mayor Dante Carpenter
Department of Public Works
Department of Planning
•
•
•
• ~ ! m •J F