HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN FC 2017/09/19 2016-2018COMMITTEE ON FINANCE
19t' Session
West Hawaii Civic Center
74-5044 Ane Keohokdlole Highway, Building A
Kailua-Kona, Hawaii
September 19, 2017
CALL TO The regular meeting of the Committee on Finance was called to order at
ORDER: 2:25 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Kailua-Kona, by Ms. Maile Medeiros David,
Chair.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Ms. Maile Medeiros David, Chair
Ms. Karen Eoff, Vice Chair
Mr. Aaron S. Y. Chung, Member
Mr. Dru Mamo Kanuha, Member (came in later)
Ms. Susan L. K. Lee Loy, Member
Ms. Eileen O'Hara, Member
Ms. Valerie T. Poindexter, Member
Mr. Herbert M. "Tim" Richards, III, Member
Ms. Jennifer Ruggles, Member (came in later)
CHR. DAVID: Before we start with Statements from the Public, I would really
like to thank Mr. Campbell for being here and being so patient. He's one of our
nominee. So I'm going to take public testimony first, Mr. Campbell. I'm going to
the outer sites.
STATEMENTS The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
FROM THE Statements from the Public on Agenda Items.
PUBLIC ON
AGENDA ITEMS: The following individuals registered to speak in support of Res. 287-17
(Comm. 43 8), and came forward when called by the Chair:
Curtis Tyler.
Cherie Griffore.
COMMUNI- The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
CATIONS: Communications.
FC -19 September 19, 2017
Change Order As directed by the Chair and with no objection from the Council Members,
of Business: the following items were taken out of order:
Comm. 437: NOMINATION OF GEORGE CAMPBELL TO THE SALARY COMMISSION
From Mayor Harry Kim, dated August 29, 2017, submitting for the Council's
review and confirmation the above nomination.
Requires Council
Confirmation by: October 15, 2017 (Section 13-4(1),
Hawaii County Charter)
Vote on Comm. 437: Mr. Richards moved to recommend confirmation of
(Approved) the appointment of Mr. George Campbell to the
Salary Commission. Seconded by Ms. Eoff and carried
by the following voice vote:
Ayes:
Committee Members Chung, Eoff, Kanuha,
Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 9.
Noes:
None.
Absent:
None.
Excused:
None.
Committee Members spoke in favor of the appointment.
CHR. DAVID: I'm going to take a brief recess. So, Mr. Campbell, can you come
up and we'll shake your hand, congratulate you. Mahalo. Recess.
Recess: At 2:43 p.m., the Chair called for a recess.
Reconvene: The meeting reconvened at 2:47 p.m.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, everyone. We are coming out of recess. What
I'd like to do first, if everyone doesn't have an objection, I'd like to first take
item—I understand the officer has been waiting here almost all day, and there's
one item on the agenda, I'd like to take that one first and then we'll take the two
Water Department reso and bill, if that's okay? Alright, Mr. Clerk, can you
please—I'm sorry, I'm looking for the -289?
MR. HENRICKS: Is that correct?
CHR. DAVID: Okay, that's the one. Thank you.
Page 2
FC -19
September 19, 2017
Res. 289-17: AUTHORIZES THE PAYMENT OF FUNDS OF A LATER FISCAL YEAR
AND OF MORE THAN ONE FISCAL YEAR FOR A MULTI-YEAR LEASE
FOR THE HAWAII COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Authorizes the Mayor to enter into a five-year lease for new Taser conducted
electrical weapons and associated equipment to be used by the Police
Department at a total cost of $385,344.49. The equipment would replace
obsolete models and become the property of the department upon completion of
the terms of the lease.
Reference: Comm. 440
Intr. by: Ms. David (B/R)
Motion to Approve: Ms. O'Hara moved to recommend adoption of Res. 289-17.
Seconded by Mr. Kanuha.
(Note: At this time, Police Lieutenant Thomas Shopay came forward to
address the members of the Committee.)
CHR. DAVID: We have Lieutenant Shopay here, yes, for questions and just a
brief explanation. Lieutenant, on the resolution.
MR. SHOPAY: Aloha, I'm Lieutenant Shopay. I'm with the Hawaii Police
Department. Thank you, Council and Chair, for having me here. I'll be happy to
entertain any questions on the resolution.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you. It's pretty much self-explanatory. Any questions,
Council Members? Hearing or seeing none—Mr. Richards, would you have any
questions for—
MS. O'HARA: I do have a question.
CHR. DAVID: Oh, okay. Ms. O'Hara, go ahead.
MS. O'HARA: Are all of the tasers and weapons and equipment for the entire
Police Department or is this just an add-on?
MR. SHOPAY: This is an add-on. So what we've been doing the previous years,
is taking small amounts of money, purchasing small parcels of the new devices as
the old ones are getting phased out. So this purchase will now outfit the whole
department, all of the new devices.
MS. O'HARA: Thank you for that.
MR. SHOPAY: You're welcome.
Page 3
FC -19 September 19, 2017
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Ms. O'Hara. Anyone else? Hearing or seeing
none—Lieutenant Shopay, thank you very much for being here and for your
patience.
MR. SHOPAY: Thank you for your time.
CHR. DAVID: All those in favor of approving Resolution 289-17 please say
"aye."
Vote on Res. 289-17: The motion to recommend adoption of Res. 289-17 was
(Approved) carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Eoff, Kanuha, Lee Loy,
O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, and
Chair David - 7.
Noes: None.
Absent: Committee Members Chung and Ruggles - 2.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: Mr. Clerk, can you please go now to Order of Resolutions,
287-17?
Res. 287-17: REQUESTS THE OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR TO CONDUCT
A PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY
TO ENSURE THE DEPARTMENT HAS ADEQUATE CONTINGENCY PLANS
TO GUARANTEE SUFFICIENT WATER SUPPLY TO CUSTOMERS AT ALL
TIMES, INCLUDING DURING A DISRUPTION OF DEEP WELL
OPERATIONS
Five of the Hawaii County Department of Water Supply's deep wells, Waiaha,
Palani, Keopu, Hualalai, and Honokohau are out of service, restricting water access
to residents, businesses, and private and public services in North and Central Kona.
Reference: Comm. 438
Intr. by: Ms. Eoff and Mr. Kanuha
Motion to Approve: Ms. Eoff moved to recommend adoption of Res. 287-17.
Seconded by Mr. Kanuha.
(Note: At this time, the Department of Water Supply's Manager -Chief
Engineer Keith Okamoto and Legislative Auditor Bonnie S. Nims came
forward to address the members of the Committee.)
CHR. DAVID: Ms. Eoff or Mr. Kanuha, whichever. Ms. Eoff, go ahead.
MS. EOFF: Okay, so given the current situation and the kind of extended, almost
seven, eight month now water restrictions, Councilman Kanuha and I felt it was
Page 4
FC -19
September 19, 2017
important that we do what we could to get a better idea of what the Water
Department could do in the future, to either prevent disruptions or guarantee that
we supply safe water and the expected water to our customers and what kind of
backup plans we may have during disruptions.
We spoke with the Legislative Auditor about this earlier, and we weren't really
sure what exactly to ask for. We were told that if we were asking for too much
technical investigating, that she would need to hire an outside auditor, and could
be very expensive and take a couple of years. So we thought maybe we would
ask her what we could do or what she could do to look at the department's current
policy or practice and give us some recommendations. She did, and we chose
this particular performance audit request. I'm wondering if Ms. Nims is there, if
she'd be willing to come to the table?
(Note: At this time, Legislative Auditor Bonnie Nims came forward to
address the members of the Committee.)
MS. NIMS: Good morning. Bonnie Nims, Legislative Auditor.
MS. O'HARA: Hi, Bonnie. Good afternoon, though.
MS. NIMS: Oh, sorry. It feels like morning still.
MS. EOFF: Thank you for being here and thank you for agreeing to go ahead
with this. Do you have—and we didn't put this in the body of the reso or even in
the title, and Mr. Tyler raised a good point. Do we have any idea of how long this
will take? Or can we put a timeframe to it?
MS. NIMS: At this point, it would be pretty difficult. I'm not even sure what
criteria that will be available to us. We need to do a little preliminary survey
work before we would have a reasonable guess on how long it would take. If I
just had a wag, I'd say five months at the very least.
MS. EOFF: Okay. We will appreciate input as soon as possible, of course. Do
you have anything else to add? Because I'm going to yield at this time. I know
we wanted to hear a little bit more from a couple of testifiers and Mr. Kanuha
may have some questions of you. But did you want to add any other comments to
why we were going to take this approach?
MS. NIMS: No, I thought you did a great job of the explanation. There's only so
much that we can do in-house without searching for a subject matter or expert to
get into the technical areas.
I think, looking at contingency plans is a way that we can do something in-house
and get something out relatively quickly without having to go through RFP
(Request for Proposal) process to get us SME (Special Matter Expert).
Page 5
FC -19
September 19, 2017
MS. EOFF: Okay, thank you. Okay, I'll yield at this time.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Ms. Eoff. Mr. Kanuha.
MR. KANUHA: Thank you, and I'm going to piggyback on that. This is the
reason why we did it this way, so that we can do it in-house, and it wouldn't take
an RFP to go outside the scope of what our current auditor could handle or the
team could handle. And how much money it would cost, it would probably be
substantial. But I know the Water department or the board—the board is actually
doing the short-term proactive approach to dealing with a lot of the issues that
Kona is facing right now. So they're going through the motions of doing that,
which I appreciate them, and they can have that immediate approach to that.
But this is more of a long-term look and how to create a little bit more
contingency plans outside of the Water department. A different entity taking a
look at it. We thought this would be a good resolution for—a proactive approach
that we could do as a Council. So, being that, I'd like to clarify a few things
Uncle Curtis was talking about earlier in his testimony.
(Note: At this time, Curtis Tyler came forward to address the members of
the Committee.)
MR. KANUHA: Uncle Curtis, I know you—I got what you were saying in the
first two minutes. I know you were rushed for the last minute. I just wanted to
get you to continue on with that because I didn't really understand a lot of that.
Maybe if you could clarify, of what you were compounding on the end of your
testimony because I really didn't fully understand. Turn on your mike, and if you
could say your name again for the record.
MR. TYLER: Aloha, my name is Curtis Tyler. Thank you, Committee
Member Kanuha and Chair David, for allowing me the opportunity to respond
to your questions and to give you further information on what I was saying.
I was at the point, where I was saying, that I wanted to provide you with solution
oriented, I mean, yeah solution oriented testimony because that's what the people
of Kona need and that's why I gave that background.
It seems to me that since every pump and every motor is different for every well,
and we know that's true, that's because the pumps are underground. They're
submersible, the motors and the pumps, so they're under the water. It means that
the water is being pushed up thousand, whatever number, of feet, and it really
should be pulled up. If it's pulled up, the pumps will be on the surface and the
motors will be on the surface, as they were at the Kahalu`u Well. They work just
wonderfully, well, for decades and decades, but then I guess somebody claimed
that, according to what I saw in the newspaper, that they were noisy.
Page 6
FC -19
September 19, 2017
I ask anyone here, would the noise of pumps bother you today, if you had water
and you could use it, or would you just like to continue to do the same thing over
and over again, and expect a different result? It isn't going to happen. It isn't.
Everybody in this room knows that doing the same thing over and over again,
coming up with the same problems, now it's even hit the private wells. Same
problem, exactly the same. That's why they remobed or demobilized and
remobed up there so they could (inaudible) the pump and the motor out. They
have them to replace, but they have to pull them up.
I think you have to look at the common sense and practical solution. I'm not an
engineer. I don't claim to be an engineer. I have all the respect for engineers and
professionals in this room. But sometimes there's either too much finger
pointing. Whether it's on the social media, as the Water manager mentioned, or
it's before you here, or it's among community members. Whether it be in the
Action Committee or for the Kona Community Development, whatever it is. It's
important, it seems to me, to do what is doable.
My comment about commissioner—Board Member Domingo and others have
stated in the paper, they thought it was a good idea to drill an adjunct, a second
well so you'd have a backup system. You don't need a backup system. Well,
first of all, drilling a second well, we all know how much it cost to drill a well per
foot, and it's a lot more expensive than these pumps, these motors, okay? You
don't need a second well if you have your pumps and motors on the surface
because they will all be, possibly with some exception, all be the same. As I say,
I'm not an engineer or an electrician, but I do know that much and it works just
fine. It worked without a flaw. I mean, we heard the noise. It's on the old, what
they call Walua Road. That was the old Kailua, Kealakekua Road.
MR. KANUHA: Uncle Curtis, real quickly, I just want to make sure that we
can—
MR. TYLER: Yeah?
MR. KANUHA: I know you're talking about Resolution 287. I know you have
a lot of ideas on how the Water Department can—
MR. TYLER: I'm going to finish on the 287. May I do that?
MR. KANUHA: Yeah, and about the audit.
MR. TYLER: Yes, about the audit. I think a performance audit makes sense
because the performance, I think, probably isn't up to what the expectations of
some of the stakeholders have. But I do believe that you need to make sure that
there's a time certain. I heard five months from your auditor—from the auditor.
Five months, six months that's fine. But there has to be something to be done in
the meantime, we can't continue to go down the same road.
Page 7
FC -19
September 19, 2017
The other point is if you're going to have an audit, you probably ought to have an
audit on a regular basis, unless of course they take me up on my solution, in
which case they won't have any more of these problems. But that's going to take
time. But now is the time because there's four of them that are down.
I really appreciate Committee Members Eoff and Kanuha that you have put this
together. I know this is not easy, and I know it's not a—you're not pointing the
fingers. You're looking for solutions, and that's what I'm talking about, okay? It
is—and you are the policymakers. You need to grasp that and hold that kuleana.
You cannot give a kuleana away. It's a responsibility. You can delegate
authority, but you cannot delegate kuleana, okay? And that's what I'm asking
you to do today. I'm here. You call me, whatever. Water manager can call me.
I'm looking at this from a long-term perspective. I'm not seven generations old.
I am seven plus seven plus decades old. But I know that it's important to consider
this.
Maybe the problem is not just with the pumps and motors, maybe the problem—I
know it's with them because we read about, but maybe it's also over-
consumption, and you talked about that in another (inaudible). I don't know this,
okay? Whether it's exceeding the maximum, both sustainable yield. Whether the
pumps can—but they're pushing.
MR. KANUHA: I think that's why we're trying to get as much information as
possible.
MR. TYLER: Yeah, thank you for the opportunity to share some more with you.
I appreciate it very much. Good luck to you and remember your kuleana.
MR. KANUHA: Mahalo, Uncle Curtis.
MR. TYLER: (Hawaiian word). Aloha. A hui hou.
MR. KANUHA: Again, real quickly, and this resolution is just a request to the
Office of the Legislative Auditor. It's up to—Bonnie, am I correct in saying that
we send a resolution to you requesting an audit, it's up to you to decide on
whether the audit is necessary and when the timeline of it is going to be, and how
you figure that all out is up to you. Am I correct in saying that?
MS. NIMS: Yes, you are correct. Just to maintain our independence, we do a
risk assessment and try to fit it in if we can; and if we deem it lower risk than
some of the other issues that we have, then we may push it off.
MR. KANUHA: Thank you. And I'm going to be emphasizing the higher risk of
this one as an important one to do. For myself, and I am sure Karen can speak for
herself, as well, but I think it would be important and incumbent on us, as the
County, to move forward with this. I'm just speaking on my thing. I know
Page 8
FC -19 September 19, 2017
you've got to figure out your risk assessment, but that's just mine. So, thank you.
I'll yield.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Mr. Kanuha. Anyone else, Council Members? No?
Alright. Then all those in favor of approving Resolution 287-17 please say "aye."
Vote on Res. 287-17: The motion to recommend adoption of Res. 287-17 was
(Approved) carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff, Kanuha,
Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. We're going to go down to, or up to
Communication 448.
Comm. 448: AUDIT REPORT NO. 2017-02: CASH HANDLING AT COUNTY OF
HAWAI`I'S DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY
From Legislative Auditor Bonnie S. Nims, dated August 25, 2017, transmitting
the above report pursuant to Hawaii County Charter Section 3-18(d)(2).
Motion to Close File: Mr. Richards moved to close file on Comm. 448. Seconded
by Ms. Poindexter.
(Note: At this time, Legislative Auditor Bonnie S. Nims and
Audit Analyst Sharilynn Olivar came forward to address the members
of the Committee.)
CHR. DAVID: I believe Ms. Olivar is available in Hilo, and so is Ms. Nims for
questions. Council Members, any questions on the audit report? Mr. Richards,
go ahead.
MR. RICHARDS: Thank you, Chair. Ms. Nims?
MS. NIMS: Good morning. Good afternoon, sorry.
MR. RICHARDS: I realize we're in a different time zone, so it's no problem.
Could you just give a brief synopsis, thumbnail sketch, of the report? I've read it.
But just from your perspective, a quick thumbnail, please?
MS. NIMS: Sure. Basically, the objective of our audit was to go into the
Department of Water Supply and look at their cash handling process of how they
handled the water receipt revenue. So customers pay for their water, they come
Page 9
FC -19
September 19, 2017
in, pay the bill, and we're looking at how that money is handled from the time it
crosses the counter or the mailbox to the time it gets deposited and posted to the
general ledger.
Basically, the synopsis of what we found, is we found significant internal control
deficiencies, including a lack of key segregation of duties as well as the lack of
independent monitoring. We felt that this was mainly due to incomplete and
inaccurate policies and procedures. As a result of these weaknesses, we couldn't
really determine if all the cash that came in over that counter or through that mail
was actually deposited and recorded into the County's books. Based on those
weaknesses and the cause of those weaknesses, we made several
recommendations to address those issues.
Last I was talking to the Department of Water Supply, most of the
recommendations have been implemented. We have not had a chance yet to
confirm those. I know our external auditors that do the financial statements
are looking at some of those. So when we do a follow-up, we'll be able to tell
100 percent, if they have been implemented.
MR. RICHARDS: And what's the timing of the follow-up? Is that six months
from now? Or, what's your estimate?
MS. NIMS: We try for about a year, give them a chance to implement the
changes. Sometimes a little bit more, sometimes a little bit less. It depends on
our schedule, too, and theirs.
MR. RICHARDS: If I recall right, you said you didn't find any evidence of any
inappropriate use of funds but this was just something loose and it needed to be
tightened up. Is that a fair statement?
MS. NIMS: Correct. We did do—we tested cash receipts. We tested 20 days
because it billed on an every other month schedule. The cash receipts that we
were able to test, that were in the system, were complete and accurate, and we
didn't find any problems, just minor clerical errors that weren't indicative of a
problem.
Our main concern, though, is what we couldn't see. One of the significant
weakness that roll into that segregation of duties and independent monitoring, was
that adjustments were never reviewed or reconciled from the paperwork to what's
in the system, to the general ledger and the bank reconciliation, to make sure that
any money that—the risk is, is that any money that came in over the counter, the
customer account could be altered, the money taken. Without reviewing those
adjustments, you'd never know because the account would balance out, the
customer would never complain that they have an overdue late payment, the
deposit matches because it was adjusted from the system, et cetera.
Page 10
FC -19
September 19, 2017
So that is why we're saying that we can't determine if money is complete,
because there was no reconciliation. We don't know if there were adjustments
out there, adjusted accounts. And that's one of our significant concerns.
MR. RICHARDS: Okay, thank you. I yield.
CHR. DAVID: Ms. O'Hara.
MS. O'HARA: Thank you, Chair. I don't know, this might be a question for
Mr. Okamoto, in terms of the response to the auditor's report. I'm reading off of
page 19. Do you have a copy of the report?
(Note: At this time, the Department of Water Supply's Manager -Chief
Engineer Keith Okamoto came forward to address the members of the
Committee.)
MR. OKAMOTO: I don't have a copy of the final.
MS. O'HARA: Well, this is a short one. I can just read it. It was about surprise
cash counts are not performed at all offices. And it says, "Beginning June 2017,
surprise cash counts were scheduled for all offices for the current fiscal year
which will be performed unannounced at each district office. A schedule will be
prepared annually going forward." Who is conducting that activity?
MR. OKAMOTO: I'll let—Keith Okamoto, Manager -Chief Engineer. But I'll
defer to our Assistant Waterworks Controller.
(Note: At this time, Assistant Waterworks Controller Candace Gray came
forward to address the members of the Committee.)
MS. GRAY: Hi. I'm Candace Gray, Assistant Controller, Department of Water
Supply. Can you repeat your question?
MS. O'HARA: It's on page 19, number 6, if you've got the report in front of
you? It's about the surprise cash count, just randomly sampling and making sure
that the amounts match, what it was anticipated.
MS. GRAY: The surprise cash counts are conducted by our Water Service
Program supervisor, who's not part of the cash receiving process.
MS. O'HARA: Okay, that's the kind of question I wanted. That's the kind of
answer I was hoping to get. Thank you, okay.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Ms. O'Hara. Anyone else? Ms. Lee Loy.
Page 11
FC -19
September 19, 2017
MS. LEE LOY: Thank you, Chair. Candace, thank you for being here or staying
here with us. I recall one of the last things I did on the Water Board was an audit
that was performed. And maybe, if it's not for you, it might be for Ms. Nims, was
the audit that was independently prepared for the Department of Water Supply
shared with Ms. Nims, which actually addressed some of these concerns that
Ms. Nims had?
MS. GRAY: The audit done by N&K CPAs, I guess I'll defer that to Ms. Nims.
MS. LEE LOY: Bonnie?
MS. NIMS: Sorry. I think we can answer that. We did look at all the prior audits
that had been done at Department of Water Supply, and this issue had not been
addressed. Shari was actually the one that went through and looked at the details,
so I can have her elaborate.
MS. OLIVAR: Hi. Shari Olivar, Audit Analyst. So this was identified through
the walk-through, where we had found that the cash receiving system was not
being reconciled to the actual deposit. It wasn't posted in prior audits, so during
Accuity, N&K, nobody had identified this issue. For N&K, just the segregation
of duties.
MS. LEE LOY: Oh, okay. So they addressed this segregation of duties but not
the receiving portion, is that accurate?
MS. OLIVAR: No. Oh, yes.
MS. LEE LOY: Yes, okay.
MS. OLIVAR: Yes, they did identify the cash receiving, just the segregation of
duties.
MS. LEE LOY: Okay. So your audit and N&K's audit actually address, or found
those segregation duties on both sides or in both audits? Did I ask that correctly?
MS. NIMS: Yes. Bonnie Nims, Legislative Auditor. You are correct. N&K, for
the last three years has recorded this as a finding, the segregation of duties issue.
They had not reported on the monitoring portion of it.
MS. LEE LOY: Great. I yield. Thanks.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Ms. Lee Loy. Anyone else? Seeing none, I think
then we can go ahead with the vote. All those in favor of Communication 448
please say "aye."
Page 12
FC -19 September 19, 2017
Vote on Comm. 448: The motion to close file on Comm. 448 was carried by the.
Filed following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff, Kanuha,
Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: Clerk, thank you. Okay, great. Thank you very much. Thank
you, Mr. Okamoto and everyone, for being here all day and for your patience.
That's it. That's it.
MR. KANUHA: We can bring something up.
CHR. DAVID: Unless we have questions, but I don't think so. Mahalo. And,
Mr. Clerk, can we just go up to the top of the agenda? Communication 14.18.
Return to Order The Chair directed the Committee to return to the order of business.
of Business:
Comm. 14.18: REPORT OF CHANGE ORDERS AUTHORIZED: JULY 1 - 15, 2017
From Finance Director Collins Tomei, dated August 7, 2017, transmitting the
above report pursuant to Hawaii County Code Section 2-12.3.
Postponed: September 6, 2017
(Note: There is a motion by Ms. O'Hara, seconded by Mr. Richards, to close file
on Comm. 14.18.)
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Mr. Clerk. And I believe Mr. Tomei is available in
Hilo for any questions. Council Members, I think this one was postponed because
they had the wrong attachment to the Council Board. If anyone else has any
questions about that, we can ask Mr. Tomei; if not, we'll move forward. Any
questions, Council Members? Hearing or seeing none, all those in favor of filing
Communication 14.18 please say "aye."
Page 13
FC -19 September 19, 2017
Vote on Comm. 14.18: The motion to close file on Comm. 14.18 was carried by the
Filed the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff, Kanuha,
Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: Okay, Communication 14.20, please.
Comm. 14.20: REPORT OF CHANGE ORDERS AUTHORIZED: AUGUST 1 - 15, 2017
From Finance Director Collins Tomei, dated August 30, 2017, transmitting the
above report pursuant to Hawaii County Code Section 2-12.3.
Motion to Close File: Ms. Eoff moved to close file on Comm. 14.20. Seconded
by Ms. Poindexter.
(Note: At this time, Finance Director Collins Tomei came forward to
address the members of the Committee.)
CHR. DAVID: Any discussion, Council Members. Ms. O'Hara, go ahead.
MS. O'HARA: I had a question on this. I have to get back to it.
CHR. DAVID: I believe Mr. Tomei is in Hilo.
MS. O'HARA: Yes.
CHR. DAVID: Aloha, Director Tomei.
MS. O'HARA: I was just curious about the change order for the HI -5 Certified
Redemption Center at County Recycling and Transfer Stations. I'm not sure
which stations and where we're adding that on to. Just kind of curious. Do you
know, Mr. Tomei?
MR. TOMEI: Collins Tomei, Finance Director. I cannot tell you exactly where,
but I know they were reshuffling the locations of the center.
MS. O'HARA: Okay, it's kind of relevant because there's a little huhu going on
in Pahoa Village about the removal of the HI -5 Redemption Center from the
Pahoa Transfer Station, and so I was kind of curious if this was reinstating it?
Page 14
FC -19
September 19, 2017
MR. TOMEI: I think what I remember from this, it might have been—well, I
know for a fact it transferred from the Kea` au Transfer Station to the Kea` au
Town someplace. I might have to get back to you on that.
MS. O'HARA: Then, no, I think it was from Pdhoa Transfer Station to Pdhoa
Town, and that's why they took it out of the transfer station. A lot of people in
Pdhoa would prefer that it be back in the transfer station. That's why I was
asking, which—what this change order applied to. Very little information here.
MR. TOMEI: Let me get back to you on that one.
MS. O'HARA: Okay, appreciate it. Thank you.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you. Mr. Richards, go ahead.
MR. RICHARDS: Yeah, thank you, Chair. I had two questions on the change
orders, one for the La`aloa Beach Park, two -and -a -half times the original contract.
Comment on that? How did we miss the mark so badly?
MR. TOMEI: Again, this is something that came up with Parks and Rec. But
that work that was going on with the La`aloa parking area, right now there's a—it
has to do with a burial treatment plan, so there were unexpected expenses on that.
MR. RICHARDS: So is it my understanding that a burial was discovered during
the process?
MR. TOMEI: I believe the burial was already, let's say identified, and then as
they did more work, more, I guess, questions came up about that.
MR. RICHARDS: Okay. And then the other question I had, concerning the
architectural and engineering services for the Prosecuting Attorney's office, it
seems like we had a bunch of change and just curious of why we're doing that. If
we bid this stuff out, then we have these changes coming forth it just bothers me,
so what's the explanation there?
MR. TOMEI: Okay, what happened was that I think the Prosecuting Attorney's
office was initially scheduled to be attached to the, I guess, the new courthouse,
but then they changed the location so that prompted that particular change order.
MR. RICHARDS: Okay. That change, was that on our side or did someone
change that for us?
MR. TOMEI: That was on our side.
MR. RICHARDS: Okay, I yield.
Page 15
FC -19 September 19, 2017
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Mr. Richards. Anyone else? Ms. Eoff, go ahead.
MS. EOFF: Mr. Tomei, would you know on the Prosecutor's office, is that still
going to be located here by the West Hawaii Civic Center or on the site?
MR. TOMEI: Yes, that is the plan.
MS. EOFF: Okay, thank you.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Ms. Eoff. Anyone else? Seeing none, all those in
favor of filing Communication 14.20 please say "aye."
Vote on Comm. 14.20: The motion to close file on Comm. 14.20 was carried by the
Filed the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Eoff, Kanuha, Lee Loy,
O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 8.
Noes: None.
Absent: Committee Member Chung - 1.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: Mr. Clerk, Communication 15.15.
Comm. 15.15: REPORT OF FUND TRANSFERS AUTHORIZED: AUGUST 1 - 15, 2017
From Controller Kay Oshiro, dated August 22, 2017.
Vote on Comm. 15.15: Ms. Poindexter moved to close file on Comm. 15.15.
Filed Seconded by Ms. Eoff and carried by the following
voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Eoff, Kanuha, Lee Loy,
O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 8.
Noes: None.
Absent: Committee Member Chung - 1.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: Mr. Clerk, Communication 437. Oh, I'm sorry.
MR. HENRICKS: I think we're done, to 288.
CHR. DAVID: Sorry, my bad.
MR. HENRICKS: It's been a long morning.
Page 16
FC -19
ORDER OF
RESOLUTIONS:
September 19, 2017
CHR. DAVID: It has been. Thank you. 448.
MR. HENRICKS: Two, eight, eight. I think that's the last item.
The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
Order of Resolutions.
Res. 288-17: AUTHORIZES THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, STATE OF
HAWAII
The agreement would provide $5,500 from the Department of Research and
Development to support Kea` au High School's robotics program. Students in
the program would construct a robot to survey the internal conditions of the air
conditioning duct system at Kea`au High School, and perform routine cleaning
of the ducts to eliminate dust, dirt, and mold.
Reference: Comm. 439
Intr. by: Ms. David (B/R)
Motion to Approve: Ms. Eoff moved to recommend adoption of Res. 288-17.
Seconded by Ms. O'Hara.
CHR. DAVID: Any discussion, Council Members? Mr. Richards, go ahead.
MR. RICHARDS: Sorry, anytime we spend money I'm curious. So we are doing
something at the Kea` au High School, which is a State facility, and we're using
our County funds. Wasn't the justification of taking our TAT (Transient
Accommodation Tax) funds was to run the State?
CHR. DAVID: Well, we have Mr. Ron Whitmore in our Hilo office to answer
that very question.
MR. RICHARDS: I would like that question answered, please.
(Note: At this time, Research and Development Deputy Director
Ron Whitmore came forward to address the members of the Committee.)
MR. WHITMORE: Good afternoon. Ron Whitmore, Deputy Director,
Department of Research and Development. Excellent question. However, this is
a good example of a small investment that makes a tremendous impact. Look for
a little context to this, as a grant award made through the department's Annual
Economic Development grant program, through its RFP (Request for Proposal)
program. This falls under the business development section of that granting
program. It's a very small grant being matched by other dollars put up by the
DOE (Department of Education) and other supporters of the Kea`au High School
robotics program.
Page 17
FC -19
September 19, 2017
This is simply funding materials and related supplies to support the high school
robotics program's design and development of a robot that will then clean the
ducts within the high school. So it's solving an ongoing challenge the high school
faces that require significant time and financial expense on their part, while giving
the students who are on a track in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and
Mathematics) careers and related industries an opportunity to develop and deploy
a very practical solution, meeting their own school's immediate technological
challenges.
As you may be aware, the reason why it's coming before Council is because HRS
(Hawai`i Revised Statutes) 46-7 requires that anytime the County enters into a
cooperative agreement with any other governmental entity, it requires Council
approval.
MR. RICHARDS: Okay, that answers the question. And, yeah, it will have great
application for us. I'm sensitive if we are maintaining a State facility that
happens to be a school, and I do appreciate that.
MR. WHITMORE: It's not the case.
MR. RICHARDS: That's not the case. Thank you. I yield.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Mr. Richards. Ms. Poindexter.
MS. POINDEXTER: Yeah, we're not maintaining that State facility, but we are
helping out the State, correct?
MR. WHITMORE: Indirectly. The impetusism for the program is to support the
robotics program.
MS. POINDEXTER: Right.
MR. WHITMORE: It's the secondary side effect that the application of the robot
the students are developing will be used to—
MS. POINDEXTER: Right, and main thing it goes back to the kids, the students.
However, I just want to put this on record, for our State Legislators to know that
we do work in ways to help the State on a lot of issues as well as—because they
always try to throw it in. I know they tried to throw that in my face, that they've
always been just helping out the counties. But we, too, find ways to work
together. So I appreciate that and I just wanted to get that on record. Thank you.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Ms. Poindexter. Point well -noted. Okay, anyone
else? All those in favor of approving Resolution 288-17 please say "aye."
Page 18
FC -19
September 19, 2017
Vote on Res. 288-17: The motion to recommend adoption of Res. 288-17 was
(Approved) carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff, Kanuha,
Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: Mr. Clerk, can you go to the last item, I believe,
Resolution 290-17?
Res. 290-17: AUTHORIZES THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO A MULTI-YEAR HOUSING
ASSISTANCE PAYMENT CONTRACT WITH UHC 00525 HILO LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP OWNERS OF E KOMO MAI, SELECTED FOR THE
SECTION 8 PROJECT -BASED VOUCHER PROGRAM AS OFFERED
THROUGH A PUBLIC NOTICE DATED FEBRUARY 12, 19 AND 26, 2012
Authorizes the Mayor to enter into a new five-year agreement to continue
providing rental assistance for up to 11 eligible participants.
Reference: Comm. 441
Intr. by: Ms. David (B/R)
(Note: Comm. 441.1, from Council Member Maile David dated
September 11, 2017, transmitting proposed amendments to Res. 290-17, was
circulated.)
Motion to Approve: Ms. Eoff moved to recommend adoption of Res. 290-17.
Seconded by Mr. Richards.
CHR. DAVID: And I believe Mr. Gyotoku is in Hilo to answer questions. But I
think—Mr. Clerk, should we just go ahead with the proposed amendment first,
then, before discussion? Okay, may I have a motion to amend Resolution 290
with the contents of Communication 44 1. 1 ?
Motion to Amend: Mr. Kanuha moved to amend Res. 290-17 with the contents
of Comm. 441.1. Seconded by Ms. Poindexter.
CHR. DAVID: And, discussion. For Council Members, this is just to change,
correcting the date of publication. Changing the date from the 26th to the 29th, in
the title as well as in the whereas and enacting clauses. So this is a pretty simple
amendment. If anyone has no other questions, I'll take a vote on the amendment.
All those in favor of amending Resolution 290-17 with the contents of
Communication 441.1 please say "aye."
Page 19
FC -19
September 19, 2017
Vote on Motion to
The motion to amend Res. 290-17 with the contents of
Amend:
Comm. 441.1 was carried by the following voice vote:
(Approved)
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff, Kanuha,
Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: And now we're back to Resolution 290, as amended. Any
discussion Council Members? No? Oh, Ms. O'Hara, thank you.
MS. O'HARA: Since we have members of the Office of Housing here, perhaps
they could just explain this in real simple terms. I just want to make sure I
understand this action.
(Note: At this time, Housing Administrator Neil Gyotoku and
Assistant Housing Administrator Duane Hosaka came forward to address
the members of the Committee.)
MR. GYOTOKU: Good afternoon. Neil Gyotoku, Housing Administrator. First
of all, I'd like to introduce to my left our new Assistant Housing Administrator,
Mr. Duane Hosaka, who we recently took away from Civil Defense.
MR. HOSAKA: Aloha, Council. Duane Hosaka.
CHR. DAVID: Aloha, welcome.
MR. HOSAKA: Yeah, thank you.
MR. GYOTOKU: The resolution, what happens is, it continues to provide
assistance to 11 Section 8 participants at the E Komo Mai housing project.
MS. O'HARA: That was very simple. So this is just a continuation of an existing
program, and we're just acting to continue it then, you were saying?
MR. GYOTOKU: Yes, correct. We had provided in previous years. I think there
was a previous five-year contract to provide Section 8 project -based vouchers to
11 participants, and this is just a continuation of that project to help them.
MS. O'HARA: Okay. We don't do this normally for the Section 8 voucher
program, so this is a little out of the ordinary, isn't it?
MR. GYOTOKU: No, we sign contracts for different projects. For Section 8
project -based contracts, there are limited terms, usually five, ten years at the end
Page 20
FC -19 September 19, 2017
of their expiration date. This is one of the previous or earlier project -based
vouchers that we had issued, so this is just a continuation of that project for
Section 8 project based vouchers.
MS. O'HARA: And the length of time this continues is another five—?
MR. GYOTOKU: For five years.
MS. O'HARA: Five years, okay.
MR. GYOTOKU: And there is another option for another five years, I believe.
MS. O'HARA: Okay. So every time you exercise option, you come back to us?
MR. GYOTOKU: Correct.
CHR. DAVID: Okay, thank you very much. Thank you, Ms. O'Hara. Anyone
else have questions? Seeing or hearing none, all those in favor of approving
Resolution 290-17, as amended, please say "aye."
Vote on Res. 290-17: The motion to recommend adoption of Res. 290-17, as
Draft 2 amended to Draft 2, was carried by the following voice vote:
(Approved)
Ayes:
Committee Members Chung, Eoff, Kanuha,
Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 9.
Noes:
None.
Absent:
None.
Excused:
None.
BILLS FOR The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business, Bills
ORDINANCES: for Ordinances.
(There were none.)
CHR. DAVID: I believe that takes care of our agenda. Mr. Clerk, is that it?
Alright, may I have a motion to adjourn, please?
Page 21
FC -19
September 19, 2017
ADJOURN- There being no further business, at 3:31 p.m., Mr. Richards moved to adjourn
MENT: the meeting. Seconded by Ms. Poindexter and carried by the following
voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff, Kanuha,
Lee Loy, O'Hara, Poindexter, Richards, Ruggles,
and Chair David - 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: We are adjourned. We have nine "ayes." Mahalo, everybody.
Approved:
Ms. Maile Medeiros David, Chair
Finance Committee
MD/na
(Date)
Page 22