HomeMy WebLinkAboutMIN FC 2019/06/03 2018-2020CALL TO
ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
Present:
STATEMENTS
FRC)N4 TNF
PUBLIC ON
AGENDA ITEMS:
CC)N4N4T TNT -
CATIONS
Committee on Finance
12th Session
Hawaii County Building
25 Aupuni Street
Hilo, Hawaii
June 3, 2019
The regular meeting of the Committee on Finance was called to order at
2:20 p.m., in the Council Chambers, Hilo, by Ms. Maile Medeiros David, Chair.
Ms. Maile Medeiros David, Chair
Mr. Herbert M. "Tim" Richards, III, Vice Chair
Mr. Aaron S. Y. Chung, Member
Ms. Karen Eoff, Member
Mr. Matt Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Member
Ms. Ashley L. Kierkiewicz, Member
Ms. Susan L. K. Lee Loy, Member
Ms. Valerie T. Poindexter, Member (came in later)
Ms. Rebecca Villegas, Member
The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
Statements from the Public on Agenda Items.
The following individuals registered to speak and came forward when called
by the Chair:
Jon Olson:
Jerome Warren:
Shelley S. Mahi-hanai
Sandra Demoruelle:
Bill 75 (Comm. 302), comment.
Bill 75 (Comm. 302); and
Bill 76 (Comm. 303); in opposition.
Bill 75 (Comm. 302); and
Bill 76 (Comm. 303); comment.
Bill 75 (Comm. 302); and
Bill 76 (Comm. 303); in opposition.
CHR. DAVID: I'm closing public testimony, and we shall move on to
Communications. Mr. Clerk, please, Communication 10.12.
The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
Communications.
FC -12
June 3, 2019
Comm. 10.12: REPORT OF CHANGE ORDERS AUTHORIZED: APRIL 1 — 15, 2019
From Finance Director Deanna Sako, dated May 3, 2019, transmitting the above
report pursuant to Hawaii County Code Section 2-12.3.
Vote on Comm. 10:12: Ms. Lee Loy moved to close file on Comm. 10.12.
Filed Seconded by Ms. Poindexter and carried by the following
voice vote:
Comm. 11.10
Vote on Comm. 11.10
Filed
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff,
Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Lee Loy,
Poindexter, Richards, Villegas, and
Chair David — 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
REPORT OF FUND TRANSFERS AUTHORIZED: APRIL 16 — 30, 2019
From Controller Kay Oshiro, dated May 7, 2019.
Mr. Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder moved to close file on
Comm. 11.10. Seconded by Ms. Eoff and carried
by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff,
Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Lee Loy,
Poindexter, Richards, Villegas, and
Chair David — 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
Comm. 119.1: THIRD QUARTER REALLOCATION REPORT: JANUARY — MARCH 2019
From Human Resources Director William V. Brilhante, Jr., dated May 13, 2019.
Vote on Comm. 119.1: Ms. Villegas moved to close file on Comm. 119.1.
Filed Seconded by Ms. Poindexter and carried by the following
voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff,
Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Lee Loy,
Poindexter, Richards, Villegas, and
Chair David — 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
Page 2
FC -12 June 3, 2019
ORDER OF The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
RESOLUTIONS: Order of Resolutions.
(There were none.)
BILLS FOR The Chair directed the Committee to proceed to the next order of business,
ORDINANCES: Bills for Ordinances.
Bill 75: AUTHORIZES THE MAYOR OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII TO ENTER
INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR A STATE
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND LOAN FOR
WASTEWATER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; AND
AUTHORIZES THE ISSUANCE OF $10,000,000 OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII FOR THE
PURPOSE OF FINANCING QUALIFIED WASTEWATER PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII
Funds would be used for the following projects: Na`alehu Wastewater
Treatment and Disposal System and Drainage Modifications ($7 million),
Na`alehu Wastewater Collection System ($2 million), and Na`alehu Sewage
Pump Station and Force Main ($1 million).
Reference: Comm. 302
Intr. by: Ms. David (B/R)
Motion to Approve: Mr. Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder moved to recommend passage
of Bill 75 on first reading. Seconded by Ms. Villegas.
CHR. DAVID: Council Members, discussion? I believe we have Ms. Sako here;
and I believe Dora Beck is here if we have questions, Council Members.
MR. RICHARDS: Chair, not first reading, coming out of Committee.
CHR. DAVID: Oh, I'm sorry. Thank you. So anyone has questions on this one?
Ms. Eoff, go ahead.
MS. EOFF: Thank you. Well, it's my understanding that we are mandated to get
off of the cesspool situation, and this State Revolving Loan Fund is a very low
interest rate for us. I know there's been some concerns about the location, but this
really—the location is not really what we're discussing here now. It's whether to
support and approve the issuance of the obligation bonds, correct?
CHR. DAVID: I believe that's correct, yes. Would you like Ms. Sako to come
up?
MS. EOFF: No, I kind of just wanted to clarify that.
Page 31
FC -12
June 3, 2019
CHR. DAVID: Alright. Are you done, Ms. Eoff?
MS. EOFF: Unless if they have something that they wanted to add, I'm good.
CHR. DAVID: Okay. Mr. Richards, go ahead.
MR. RICHARDS: Thank you, Chair. Deanna?
(Note: At this time, Finance Director Deanna Sako came forward to
address the members of the Committee.
MS. SAKO: Good afternoon. Deanna Sako, Director of Finance.
MR. RICHARDS: Thanks, Deanna, for being here. This is for a $10 million
bond, and it says up to 20 years. What's your expectation as far as the bonding?
know we have the low interest rates. What's our monthly liability on this, excuse
me, annual liability going to be on this?
MS. SAKO: I didn't calculate it, specifically. But the interest is still maintaining
at that really low percent, half -percent or so, and then we do usually take the full
20 years. We start paying back when we draw, and then it's based on each
drawdown. So if the project takes five years for us to spend and we draw it down
over a five-year period, we kind of have those staggered payments. So we don't
start paying back on the whole $10 million, until such time as we've drawn it.
MR. RICHARDS: Okay, thanks. I yield.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Mr. Richards. Anyone else?
Mr. Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, go ahead.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: Deanna, what's the background? I know
Bill (Kucharski) is not here. Maybe Dora. I'm new, so I'm just kind of
wondering what the background of this and why we're replacing. Sounds like
there's a lot of questioning in the community about what's going on. So, quickly.
MS. SAKO: Dora can probably explain it better. But several years ago, probably
10 or so, we did—the town got hit with the EPA (Environmental Protection
Agency) ruling that everybody else did, that they had to get off the gang
cesspools, and at that time I believe the County agreed to take care of it.
(Note: At this time, Environmental Management Wastewater Division
Chief Dora Beck came forward to address the members of the
Committee.)
MS. BECK: Good afternoon.
Page 4
FC -12
June 3, 2019
CHR. DAVID: Good afternoon.
MS. BECK: Dora Beck, Wastewater Division Chief The background—boy, this
goes back way, way far, to early 2000. The system was owned by C. Brewer. As
I recall, they had asked the Mayor at that time, C. Brewer did, because they were
anticipating that they were going to be going through dissolution and asked if the
County would help them out with taking over the cesspool, including the closure
of it. Again, that was some time in early 2000. I believe the administration at that
time had hired a consultant to look into options for them, including I believe,
putting in sceptic tanks; or the other option was also to put in a county -owned,
and maintained sewer system. As I recall, a vote had taken place amongst the
community members, and the vote was to put in a county -owned sewer system
and treatment and disposal system. I'm probably skipping some details.
So the County agreed to an MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) to take over
the system byI believe it was 2010, because that was the date of when they
would be dissolved, C. Brewer. So that date came around and the County became
the owners of the LCCs (Large Capacity Cesspool) at that time. So since then,
we've been making efforts to try and move the LCC closures along. That's really
the main driver to this, is to close those LCCs, but at the same time we need to
replace the C. Brewer system with the system that is acceptable to DOH
(Department of Health) and EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), as well.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: So it's a Federal mandate we're following to
replace the LCCs with. I guess it was our choice to replace with a large system.
MS. BECK: Yes, it was a system that would be serving the entire community.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: Okay. Why was that decision made?
MS. BECK: Well, it's a mandate.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: No, I mean, on the County, if you have to
MS. BECK: Oh, the agreement was to replace it in 2010. Oh, I'm sorry, they
would take over the system in 2010 and then work towards replacing the system,
the existing system, and close the cesspool.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: And why not just a large sceptic tank? Is
that out of the question?
MS. BECK: We looked into that. Fuel tests were performed, and it turned out
that the disposal, the effluent, was the issue. The grounds that would be receiving
the effluent didn't have the acceptable percolation rate.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: Okay. Study was done by?
Page 5
FC -12
June 3, 2019
MS. BECK: I don't recall the name of the consultant. I want to say Fujioka.
Masa Fujioka or something like that. But there is a document that explains this.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: And then if the—sorry—the percolation
factors, if what you're saying is right, then what would happen? What is the
percolation? What is that?
MS. BECK: Percolation means the rate at which the effluent seeps into the
ground.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: Okay.
MS. BECK: Because it's not just treatment. It's also—then the treated water
needs to be disposed of.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: And where would that end up if itsorry,
wouldn't go into the ground, or it would go into the ground and diffuse
(inaudible).
MS. BECK: Well, what you would do, you would convert—you would probably
create injection wells, and that's where your effluent would be deposited into.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: And what was the problem?
MS. BECK: It wouldn't infiltrate or move through the ground fast enough.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: So it would build up and overflow?
MS. BECK: Yeah. Correct.
MR. KANEALI`I KLEINFELDER: Yeah. Yeah, I yield. I yield.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Mr. Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder. Ms. Kierkiewicz, go
ahead.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Thank you, Chair. Hi, Dora, thanks for being here. I just
have two questions for you. How come it took more than a decade for us to
finally address this? You're saying that decision was made in the early 2000s.
That was, I think, Mr. Kim's first go -around as Mayor. Nothing happened in the
following administration, and now we're finally addressing it. Is the site the
issue?
MS. BECK: The site was primarily the issue; trying to find a site that was
suitable, from a technical standpoint and also from a public standpoint.
Page 6
FC -12
June 3, 2019
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Ten years to decide on the site that is being proposed now.
MS. BECK: That took the bulls of the time, yes.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Any Federal monies coming in to help us pay for this
project?
MS. BECK: There's about a $1.8 million Federal grant, and that is directed at the
Pahala project.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: And that came in the early 2000s and it's just been sitting
in an account?
MS. BECK: That's correct. The EPA has then
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Cracking the whip?
MS. BECK: No, they've been extending it. I've been keeping in contact with
them and letting them know what's been going on. So we would send in our
justification for extension, and it was accepted each time. I believe there were
probably, I thinkI want to say seven extensions.
So EPA has been apprised of what's been going on. They understand the
problems that we've been having; why the delays. They know we've been having
a hard time with trying to move this project forward because of the siting issues.
MS. KIERKIEWICZ: Okay, thank you. I yield.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Ms. Kierkiewicz. Anyone else? Ms. Lee Loy, go
ahead.
MS. LEE LOY: Thank you, Chair. Thank you, Ms. Beck.
Attached to this bill is an exhibit, where you showed a proposed wastewater
treatment plant site. Who are the adjacent property owners to this proposed site?
MS. BECK: You're looking at the Na`alehu?
MS. LEE LOY: Yes.
MS. BECK: Yeah, I guess it is Na`alehu? We're still talking about Bill 75.
Adjacent—well, we've got Na`alehu Hongwanji. The site itself is part of the
2,000 -acre Ka`u Mahi site. I can't remember what this other property, just up to
northwest is. I forget the owner of that property. Yeah, I'm sorry. I don't
remember the name of that adjacent site, the property owner.
Page 7
FC -12
June 3, 2019
MS. LEE LOY: Ms. Sako, so really what we have before us is the request to float
this bond, to go through the design disposal system, which would then, I guess,
trigger the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and Notice to Surrounding
Property Owners when we draw it down?
MS. SAKO: Typically, this allows us to enter the agreement with the State to
pass down the funding, then that allows us to start doing the work because we
know we'll get reimbursed for it. But right, we don't start paying back until we
actually draw down the funds. So this particular one, yes; it's for like the design
and to do all of those pieces, including the environmental, I believe.
MS. LEE LOY: And then through the iteration. And maybe, Ms. Beck, you can
help us with this, when we go through the environmental assessment process,
we'll begin to better understand the impacts and mitigated measures of the
proposed site or any future proposed site that's being planned. Correct?
MS. BECK: Yes. I'm going to be working on the draft EA (Environmental
Assessment), which is expected, or anticipated, in October of this month, I mean,
of this year.
MS. LEE LOY: And, Deanna, this SRF (State Revolving Fund) covers the cost
of the preparation of the draft Environmental Assessment, and possible prep
notice for an EIS?
MS. SAKO: I believe it does.
MS. BECK: Yes.
MS. LEE LOY: Thank you, Chair. I yield.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Ms. Lee Loy. Mr. Chung, go ahead.
MR. CHUNG: Yeah, and I just wanted to follow up a little bit more on
what Ms. Lee Loy was talking about. Because, you know, I guess what
Ms. Demoruelle brought up stands for the proposition. You know, the EA is
supposed to be done as early as practicable, right? But this is just the first step,
right? We have to be able to tap into the State Revolving Fund to be able to move
forward.
MS. SAKO: Right. That's what they want the money for, it's to be able to do the
design and EA.
MR. CHUNG: So what is the process thereafter? Is this at some point going to
come back to the County Council, either in the form of an appropriation or some
kind of approval? Or is it all going to be done administratively already?
Page 8
FC -12
June 3, 2019
MS. SAKO: One second.
MR. CHUNG: Because I think these monies have to be appropriated at some
point, right?
MS. SAKO: They have some appropriations already. This project's been, you
know, kind of going through the system for awhile now. But it probably would
have to come back to amend their appropriations or something like that. The EA,
obviously, would have public notice and input, as well.
But I don't think this is enough to do the construction either. Specifically for this
this project, they would have to come back to do the whole rest of the loan, and
construction plans, and appropriations.
MR. CHUNG: Yeah, okay. But although sites have been identified, this
authorization is not site-specific, right?
MS. SAKO: No, it's not.
MR. CHUNG: Okay, so it could be moved.
MS. SAKO: Right. We're still at the phase where we're just trying to get the
money. They've looked at multiple sites, I think, for both systems, and they
continue to look at it until they find the right one. But, you know, we have not
gone through the EA process yet.
MR. CHUNG: So after this is done, then the EA process will begin shortly
thereafter.
MS. SAKO: I think I heard Dora say by October we would have the draft.
MR. CHUNG: Right. Okay, thank you.
CHR. DAVID: Thank you, Mr. Chung. Anyone else? Seeing none, thank you
ladies. All those in favor please say "aye."
Vote on Bill 75: The motion to recommend passage of Bill 75 on first
(Approved) reading was carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff,
Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Lee Loy,
Poindexter, Richards, Villegas, and
Chair David — 9.
Noes:
None.
Absent:
None.
Excused:
None.
Page 9
FC -12
June 3, 2019
Bill 76: AUTHORIZES THE MAYOR OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII TO ENTER
INTO AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR A STATE
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND LOAN FOR
WASTEWATER PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS; AND
AUTHORIZES THE ISSUANCE OF $37,000,000 OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION BONDS OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII FOR THE
PURPOSE OF FINANCING QUALIFIED WASTEWATER PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII
Funds would be used for the following projects: Pahala Wastewater
Collection System ($15 million) and Pahala Large Capacity Cesspool
Conversion ($22 million).
Reference: Comm. 303
Intr. by: Ms. David (B/R)
Vote on Bill 76: Mr. Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder moved to recommend passage of
(Approved) Bill 76 on first reading. Seconded by Ms. Poindexter and
carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff,
Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Lee Loy,
Poindexter, Richards, Villegas, and
Chair David — 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
CHR. DAVID: I believe, Mr. Clerk, that concludes our agenda for Finance.
Thank you.
ADJOURN- There being no further business, at 2:56 p.m., Ms. Poindexter moved to adjourn
MENT: the meeting. Seconded by Mr. Richards and carried by the following voice vote:
Ayes: Committee Members Chung, Eoff,
Kaneali`i-Kleinfelder, Kierkiewicz, Lee Loy,
Poindexter, Richards, Villegas, and
Chair David — 9.
Noes: None.
Absent: None.
Excused: None.
Page 10
FC -11
CHR. DAVID I hank you. Council Members
Approved
Ms. Maile Medelros David, Chair
Finance Committee
IMD,na
June 3,'_019
/S- WP7-
( Date)
Page I I