Laserfiche WebLink
COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII <br /> 1 <br /> •• Jam.-_• <br /> ` +• Nw MOf• <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 489 20 <br /> RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM CHAPTER 3, SECTION 3-6 (b) (3) & <br /> 3-11 (a) (2) (A) (ii) HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2016 EDITION, AS AMENDED), TO <br /> ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL GROUND SIGN, MOUNTED IN EXCESS OF MAXIMUM <br /> ABOVE GROUND LIMITATIONS ON 74-5035 QUEEN KA`AHUMANU HIGHWAY, <br /> TMK NUMBER (3) 7-4-008:055 (ZONED ML-3a). <br /> WHEREAS, Mid Pacific Petroleum, the owner (hereinafter "Applicant") of a business <br /> on the property identified as TMK No. (3) 7-4-008:055, located at street address 74-5035 Queen <br /> Ka`ahumanu Highway, Kailua-Kona, Hawai`i, 96740 (hereinafter the "Subject Property"), has <br /> submitted to the Director of the County Department of Public Works, an Application for a <br /> variance dated May 9, 2019 (hereinafter "Application"); from the number of ground sign <br /> limitation of Section 3-6 (b) (3), as well as height limitations of Section 3-11 (a) (2) (A) (ii) of <br /> llawai`i County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as Amended), for the Subject Property; and <br /> WHEREAS, said Application is complete with all information and attachments and fees <br /> paid as required under Sections 3-22 and 3-24, Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as <br /> Amended); and <br /> WHEREAS, the Subject Property is a retail commercial/office building located at 74- <br /> 5035 Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway, Kailua-Kona, Hawai`i, 96740 which has in excess of four <br /> hundred and fifteen (415) linear feet of frontage along Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway; and <br /> WHEREAS, the proposed second ground sign will be placed at a maximum height of <br /> 17' above the ground at the northwest corner of the property along Queen Ka`ahumanu <br /> Highway. <br /> WHEREAS, under Section 3-23(a), Hawai`i_ County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as <br /> Amended), the variance may be granted where: (1) the variance is necessitated by the peculiarity <br /> of the Applicant's outside sign requirements, (2) the adjacent tenants will not be adversely <br /> affected inasmuch as they have approved the Applicant's request, (3) the granting of the variance <br /> will not unreasonably violate the interest, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the public <br /> inasmuch as the proposed sign will identify the location of the Applicant's business premises for <br /> the public, (4) a strict application of the terms of the County Code to the Applicant would work <br /> an unnecessary hardship and practical difficulty on the Applicant inasmuch as visibility to <br /> building signage is severely limited and fuel prices need to he readily visible to passing <br /> motorists, <br />