HomeMy WebLinkAboutComm No 0043.30 - Testimony - CA-26 - Qualifications for the Director DPWFrom: Ayche McClung <ayche.mcclung@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 6:30 PM
To: Charter Commission
Subject: Message to: "Hawaii County Charter Commission, reference "CA -26"
Dear "Hawaii County Charter Commission, reference "CA -26":
I strongly oppose CA -26, the proposal to amend Section 6-2.2 relating to Qualifications for the Director of the
Department of Public Works. It is vital that the Director's qualifications continue to include the requirement to be a
"registered professional engineer", more accurately, a "licensed professional engineer (P.E.)" because:
1. The Director frequently makes engineering decisions as part of their duties and responsibilities, in fact has the
power to over -rule engineering decisions made by his or her subordinates; many of these decisions
potentially affect the safety, health, and well-being of the public;
2. The adverse risks of an unlicensed engineer, or a non -engineer, over -ruling the engineering judgement of
local DPW engineering staffs, have been well-documented by the National Society of Professional Engineers
(NSPE), and is an unacceptable risk for Hawaii County;
3. Licensed P.E.'s are bound by the NSPE Code of Ethics for Engineers, which first cannon states that "Engineers,
in the fulfillment of their fundamental duties, shall hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the
public".
4. The very concept of engineering licensure was developed over a century ago after a series of engineering
disasters causing much damage and fatalities occurred, due to inexperienced persons making critical
engineering decisions. Degrading the nationwide system of licensed engineers in responsible charge of
matters of vital engineering decisions goes against the need to "hold paramount" the safety of the public."
A3741 I
Di red: (808) 333...392o
(80 8) 443._03(.
1DL1
1
Comm. No. 43.30
(70NFIDENTIALI7'Y NOTICE: This email messoge inc hiding any ottachments; is 'Or the sole use of the intended ret ipient(S) and
moy contain ititivmation thot ts proprietary, contidentiol, privileged or otherwise legally exempt from disc losure. Ilya( ore not the
named addressee QJ (1/1 messoge, you ore hereby notified that this messoge was' not intended fOr you, and your receipt offhis messoge
U as' an inadvertent disc losure QJ the ititivmation ond contents' herein; therefive, you ore not outhorized to rend, print reknit copy, or
disseminate tilts' message or any port of it, Ifyou hm,e received dn.'s' communication in error, pleo'.e notifiv us immediately by email
and delete all copies of the messoge together with all documentsattached. Plank you.
2