Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBACKGROUND REPORTB!kaikaOhanaREZAmend.crk.10.22.2020. COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT IKAIKA OHANA(FORMERLY GIAMPAOLO "PAUL"BOSCHETTI) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 10 32 (REZ 09-103) IKAIKA OHANA has submitted an application for a five(5)-year time extension to complete construction and deletion of additional parking requirements in Condition E(Time to Complete Construction), a one(1)-year time extension to Condition G (Time to Dedicate Road Widening Strip), deletion of Condition J (Requirement to Install Streetlights and Traffic Control Devices), deletion of Condition P (Fair Share Requirements), and deletion of Condition R(Impact Fees) of Ordinance No. 10 32, which reclassified 5.05 acres of land from a Single-Family Residential— 7,500 square feet(RS-7.5) and Multiple-Family Residential— 1,000 square feet(RM-1)to a Multiple-Family Residential— 1,500 square feet(RM-1.5) zoned district. The subject properties are located south of Kukuau Street, on the west side (mauka) of Kapi`olani Street above the County Police Department Headquarters building, Kukuau 1st, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMK: 2-4-025:048, 053, and 080. Applicant's Request 1. Original Project Status: The current landowner and original applicant, Giampaolo Paul"Boschetti, sought and was granted a change of zone for the subject properties to facilitate the development of a proposed 100-unit, market rate,multiple-family rental housing project and related improvements. Despite the landowner's efforts over time to complete the development,he has abandoned the project due to uncertainty in financial markets and fluctuations in demand for market-rate, multiple-family rental units in Hilo. Instead, Mr. Boschetti (seller)has entered into a purchase agreement with the intent to sell the property to A0705 Hilo, L.P. (buyer),which is a single purpose limited partnership and an affiliate of Ikaika Ohana(applicant). Ikaika Ohana is a nonprofit 501(c)3 organization with a mission of developing and operating affordable housing, including projects on the mainland, O`ahu, Maui, three existing affordable rental projects in Hilo and one under development in Waikoloa. 2. Proposed Project: Upon transfer of property ownership, Ikaika Ohana is proposing to develop Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani, a 64-unit, 100% affordable rental housing development 63 units with income restrictions between 30% and 60%of area median income and one 1)unrestricted manager's unit). The applicants original site plan proposed twenty-eight 28), two (2)-bedroom units, twenty-nine(29), three(3)-bedroom units and seven(7), four(4)-bedroom units within eight(8), two (2)-story buildings. Also shown are a community center building,play area, two (2) laundry facilities, community gardens, and 117 parking stalls including five(5)handicapped stalls. However, the applicant submitted an updated site plan(see P.D. Exhibit 2)that removed the proposed building height,unit summary,proposed building and floor area, open space area, overall parking area and number of parking stalls to maximize flexibility in site design. 3. Financing: The proposed affordable housing development will be financed through Low- Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC),bonds, Section 8 project-based vouchers, a State Hawaii Housing Finance&Development Corporation(HHFDC) Rental Housing Revolving Fund loan(RHRF), and other private sources. In January 2019, the buyer received an award of vouchers from the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development. In December 2019, the buyer received awards of LIHTC, bonds, and RHRF financing from HHFDC. The sale of the property and transfer of ownership will take place when all of the financial resources are finalized and made available to the development,which will be approximately the same time as the start of construction. Construction of the proposed affordable housing project is anticipated to begin in the first quarter of2021 and is estimated to cost approximately$40 million and take two (2)years to complete. Finally, components of the proposed project's funding requires that the units remain affordable for a minimum of thirty(30)years, however, the applicant is proposing to maintain the affordability restrictions for sixty-five (65)years. 4. Request: In order to reduce costs and to facilitate the sale of the property and subsequent development of the proposed 100% affordable housing project within tight budget constraints and stringent funding requirements, the applicant is requesting the following amendments to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 10 32: A five(5)-year time extension to Condition E (Time to Complete Construction). A one(1)-year time extension to Condition G (Time to Dedicate Road Widening Strip); 2- Deletion of Condition J (Requirement to Install Streetlights and Traffic Control Devices); Deletion of Condition P (Fair Share Requirements); and Deletion of Condition R(Impact Fees). Please note that the applicant originally requested the deletion of the additional parking requirement articulated in Condition E. However, they submitted a request to withdraw that amendment request via letter dated October 22, 2020. (see P.D. Exhibit 3). The specific amendment requests follow(material to be deleted is bracketed/struck through,material to be added is underscored): Amend Condition E: Construction ofthe proposed development shall be completed withinfive(5)years from the effective date ofthis ordinance, as amended. Prior to construction, the applicant, successors or assigns shall secure Final Plan Approvalfor the proposed development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section 25-2-70, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawai`i County Code. Plans shall identify all existing and/or proposed structures, paved driveway accesses andparking stalls associated with the proposed development. The applicant shall develop parking spaces associated with the proposed development in accordance with the required parking spaces pursuant to Sections 25-4-51 and 25-4-52, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawai`i County Code. In addition, the applicant shall develop additional parking spaces up to a maximum of60%ofthe required spaces for the total residential units to be built within the proposed development.-Landscaping shall also be indicated on the plansfor thepurpose ofmitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements ofPlanning Department's Rule No. 17(Landscaping Requirements). The applicant shall comply with landscaping requirements for RM zoning. Amend Condition G: The applicant shall subdivide and dedicate to the County a ten (10)foot widefuture road widening strip along the entire Kapi'olani Streetfrontage ofParcel 53, J within twelve 12) months from the effective date of this ordinance, as amended. 3- Delete Condition J: Delete Condition P: 11. . • . •, . . ' Delete Condition R: 5.Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 343: The use of Federal and State funding for the proposed affordable housing project triggered the requirement for an Environmental Assessment(EA)under HRS Chapter 343. The applicant completed a draft in June 2020 and is awaiting the Office of Housing and Community Development(accepting agency) to publish the draft EA in in the Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC) bulletin, the Environmental Notice. Once published, the applicant anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impacts (FONSI). 6. Landowner: Giampaolo Boschetti under purchase and sale agreement with A0705 Hilo, L.P. 4- 7. Supportive Information: The applicant has submitted the attached in support of the request. (P.D. Exhibit 1 — Change of Zone Amendment Request dated September 1, 2020, P.D. Exhibit 2- Revised Site Plan dated October 20, 2020 and PD Exhibit 3 — Letter from Carlsmith Ball LLP dated October 22, 2020). PERMITTING HISTORY 8. May 10,2010—Effective Date of Ordinance No. 10 32, which reclassified 5.05 acres of land from a Single-Family Residential—7,500 square feet(RS-7.5) and Multiple-Family Residential— 1,000 square feet (RM-1)to a Multiple-Family Residential— 1,500 square feet(RM-1.5) zoned district. 9. January 28,2015—Effective Date of Final Subdivision Approval (CON-14-000267- Revised) consolidating the three subject parcels and subdividing Lot 9-L-6-A(10-foot road widening strip as required by Condition D and Condition G of the subject change of zone ordinance. 10. April 20, 2015—Date of letter from Planning Director granting a five(5)-year administrative time extension to May 10, 2020 to comply with Condition E(Time to Complete Construction) and Condition G (Time to Dedicate Road Widening Strip). 11. September 3,2020—Date of submittal of subject change ofzone amendments. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 12. State Land Use Designation: Urban. 13. County Zoning: Multiple-Family Residential— 1,500 square feet(RM-1.5). 14. GP LUPAG Map: Medium Density Urban. 15. Hilo Community Development Plan (CDP): The Hilo Community Development Plan adopted by Planning Commission Resolution No. 1 on May 21, 1975 identifies the area as RS/RM/PUD. 16. Special Management Area (SMA): The Special Management Area is a part of the Coastal Zone Management Program and regulated by the County. The site is located approximately %2 mile from the nearest shoreline and is not situated within the SMA. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTIES AND SURROUNDING AREA 17. Subject Properties: The proposed rezone area consists of three parcels ofunimproved land totaling approximately 5.05 acres. Kukuau Street abuts parcel 80 along its northern border, Kapi`olani Street abuts parcel 53 along its eastern boundary, and parcel 48 has no 5- roadway frontage. Parcel 80 contains access easements to Kukuau Street granted in favor ofparcels 59 and 132. 18. Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses: Surrounding properties in the general area are zoned RS-7.5, RD-3.75, and RM-1. Land uses within the vicinity include the Hawaii Vision Specialists medical office directly adjacent to the east, the County Police Department Headquarters complex located immediately east ofKapi`olani Street, St. Joseph's School to the southeast and single-family and multiple family residences such as Hualalai Subdivision to the southwest and Sunset Villas Condominiums to the north. 19. FIRM: Zone"X", an area ofminimal flood hazard. Major depression ponding occurs east ofparcel 48 along Kapi`olani Street and on parcel 53. 20. Floral/Faunal Resources: A Botanical Survey, Mohouli Drainage Area was conducted by Geometrician Associates, LLC and a Survey ofAvian and Terrestrial Mammalian Species, Kukuau Street to Kapi`olani Road Mohouli Drainage Improvement Project was conducted by Rana Productions, Ltd in September 2006 for the County Department of Public Works' project to acquire existing drainage way lands. The subject properties were included in these surveys. The current vegetation on the site which consists of a dense forest of large alien trees, groundcover and alien vines has been heavily modified by human use. According to these surveys, no listed, threatened, or endangered plant, mammalian or avian species were found on the properties. 21. Historical/Archaeological/Cultural Resources: An Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessmentfor the Proposed Acquisition ofDrainageway Lands Project was conducted by Rechtman Consulting, LLC in August 2006 which included the subject properties. The survey identified a single archaeological site on parcel 48 identified as SHPD Site 25547 and determined the site is probably historic in origin and considered significant for the information it has yielded regarding early twentieth century use. The survey concluded that the site was recorded in detail and has virtually no excavation potential, thus requires no further work or preservation. Additionally, the survey concluded that the properties do not contain valued cultural or natural resources and no traditional or customary native Hawaiian rights are being practiced on the site. As only a portion of Parcel 80 was covered under the AIS referenced above,the applicant commissioned an Archaeological Field Inspection(AFI) for the entirety of Parcel 80, 6- which was completed by ASM Affiliates in September 2020 (P.D. Exhibit 4—Letter including Archaeological Field Inspection Report from ASM Affiliates dated September 29,2020).The archaeologists conducted a 100%coverage surface inspection ofParcel 80, where no historic properties were observed. Based on the preceding, the report concluded that the proposed change of zone amendments would have no effect on historic properties. A cbpy ofthe AFI was sent to the State Historic Preservation Division for review under HRS Chapter 6E. As of the date of this writing, neither the applicant nor the Department have received a response. 22. Public Access: There is no record of a designated public access to the shoreline or mountain areas that traverses the properties. 23. Traffic: Witcher Engineering LLP completed a traffic impact analysis report(TIAR) for the proposed project in July 2009. The TIAR analyzed the impacts of the then proposed 100-unit, market-rate rental housing development on the unsignalized Kapi`olani Street/Kukuau Street intersection, signalized Kapi`olani Street/Ponahawai Street intersection, and traffic along Kapi`olani and Kukuau Streets. The TIAR concluded that the proposed project will generate 51 a.m. peak hour trips and 63 p.m. peak hour trips and that the proposed driveways will operate at acceptable levels of service for all traffic movements during peak hours for a 20-year forecast. The TIAR also concluded that the traffic at the study intersections under the 20-year extrapolation will not be caused by the project,but by the expected increase in background traffic in the area. The applicant submitted a second TIAR with the amendment request that analyzed the impacts ofthe new, 64-unit affordable rental housing development on three(3) intersections: 1) Kupukupu Street/Kukuau Street(project access at Kukuau Street); 2) Kapi`olani Street/Kukuau Street; and Kapi`olani Street/Hualalai Street. Based on 2019 counts, existing traffic volumes in the study area were generally light with the studied roadways servicing local traffic only. The study intersections operated satisfactorily during both peak hours of traffic with all movements operating at level of service(LOS) C or better. The TIAR determined that at full build out,the project is projected to generate a total of 32 net external trips during the AM peak hours of traffic, and 42 net external trips during the PM peak hours of traffic. Despite the added traffic, all movements will continue to operate similar to existing conditions at LOS C or better 7- during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. Both project access intersections are anticipated to operate with all movements at LOS B or better during both peak hours. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 24. Access: Access to the subject properties are from Kukuau Street and Kapi`olani Street. Kukuau Street is a two-lane County roadway, classified as a collector,having a pavement width of 15 to 17 feet within an approximately 15 to 20 feet right-of-way width fronting parcel 80. Kapi`olani Street is a two-lane County roadway, classified as a secondary arterial,with an existing pavement width of 28 feet within a 40-foot right-of-way fronting parcel 53. The Kapi`olani Street frontage is improved with a concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk; asphalt sidewalk berms exist along the Kukuau Street property frontage. 25. Water: County water is available to the property via an existing eight(8)-inch water line within Kapi`olani Street and a six(6)-inch water line within Kukuau Street, however, there are no existing services to the subject parcels . According to Department of Water Supply(DWS), an existing water commitment for 97 additional units of water for the former proposed development expired on January 13, 2016. As the scope of the development has changed, the applicant submitted updated estimated water demand calculations to DWS of 29,600 gallons per day(GPD) or 74 equivalent water units at 400 GPD per unit requiring a 3-inch meter with a 4-inch service lateral. DWS also determined an updated water commitment fee, facilities charges,water system improvements and dedication requirements. 26. Wastewater System: A County sewer line is located along Kukuau Street fronting parcel 80. According to the Department of Environmental Management (DEM)- Wastewater Division,the applicant shall connect to the sewer pursuant to Chapter 21-5, Hawaii County Code. Additionally, DEM requires that the applicant conduct a sewer study in accordance with applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Finally,the applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts ofthe proposed project. 8- 27. Solid Waste: Solid waste will be disposed of at an authorized landfill by commercial haulers or individual homeowners. 28. Essential Utilities and Services: Telephone services are available to the property. According to HELCO, off-site electrical distribution systems will need to be upgraded and on-site distribution systems will need to be installed by the applicant in order to provide electrical services to the project. Police services are located adjacent to the property, across Kapi`olani Street. Fire services are located in downtown Hilo. Medical services are available at Hilo Medical Center. AGENCIES' AND ORGANIZATIONS' COMMENTS 29. Department of Public Works-Engineering Division: (P.D. Exhibit 5—October 13, 2020 memo.) 30. Department of Water Supply: (P.D. Exhibit 6—October 12,2020 memo.) 31. Department of Environmental Management-Wastewater Division: (P.D. Exhibit 7— October 6, 2020 memo.) 32. Police Department: (P.D. Exhibit 8—September 30,2020 memo.) 33. State Department of Transportation: (P.D. Exhibit 9—October 7,2020 letter.) AGENCIES -NO COMMENTS OR OBJECTIONS 34. Department of Environmental Management—Solid Waste Division, Fire Department, Office of Housing and Community Development, DLNR-Land Division. AGENCIES-NO RESPONSES 35. Department of Public Works-Traffic Division, Department of Public Works-Building Division, State Department of Health, State Land Use Commission, State Office of Planning, DLNR-Historic Preservation Division, HELCO. APPLICANTS RESPONE TO AGENCY COMMENTS 36. The applicant has submitted letters responding to agency comments (P.D. Exhibit 10- Letter dated October 20,2020 responding to Police Department comments,P.D. Exhibit 11 -Letter dated October 20, 2020 responding to DEM comments and P.D. Exhibit 12—Letter dated October 22, 2020 Responding to DOT) PUBLIC COMMENTS 37. None as ofthis writing. 9- a. s CV PLA i a 4S DEPT lb 191(I' N1/4......‘ v. i. 4.-P'‘, p 3 2610 Pacific Heights Road•Honolulu,Hawaii 96813•(808)829-1426 f. C #-t ia Corporate:2000 E Fourth Street,Suite 220•Santa Ana,CA 92706•(714)835-3955 September 1, 2020 Michael Yee Planning Director Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Jeff Darrow RE: Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32: Request for Time Extension and Amendment to Conditions Applicant: Ikaika Ohana TMK Nos.: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 (collectively the "Property") Dear Mr. Yee: Please accept this letter requesting the time extension of, and amendment to conditions identified in Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32, effective May 10, 2010, for the Property Ord. 10-32"). Mr. Boschetti's original development proposed a 100-unit, four-story multiple- family residential complex consisting of six structures comprised of studios, 1-and 2-bedroom units and accessory uses. In February 2019, Mr. Boschetti entered into a purchase and sale agreement for the Property with A0705 Hilo, L.P. (the "Buyer"). The Buyer is an affiliate of lkaika Ohana, a Hawaii non-profit corporation (the "Applicant"). The Buyer intends to purchase the Property and contract with the Applicant to develop approximately 64 multiple-family affordable rental housing apartments serving households earning between 30%and 60%of area median income (the "Revised Project"). The Applicant is requesting amendments to several conditions of approval under Rezoning Ord. No. 10-32 to allow for the development of these affordable housing units in Hilo, Hawaii. The Applicant has already obtained funding commitments from the State of Hawaii for Federal and State subsidies and from private sources in the amount of approximately $40,000,000. Construction could commence in the first quarter of 2021, assuming the timely approval of the time extension and amendment requests. In the interest of time, I would like to draw your attention to the following requests for amendment to Ord. 10-32, as furter detailed in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference: 1. Condition E— Extend the time within which to complete construction of the Revised Project and amend the minimum parking requirement for the Revised Planning Dept. Exhibit Mr. Michael Yee September 1, 2020 Page 2 Project to the minimum number of off-street parking stalls required in the Hawai'i County Code (i.e., 1.25 stalls per unit); 2. Condition G—Amend the deadline to grant easement(s) 3. Condition.1 —Delete the requirement to install traffic control devices; 4. Condition P—Delete the requirement to pay fair share contributions, as is customary for affordable housing; and S. Condition R— Delete the imposition or assessment of Unified Impact Fees. Please direct future communications relating to this matter to the following: On Behalf of Ikaika Ohana On Behalf of Giampaolo Boschetti James Rock Steven S.C. Lim UHC H4 LLC Carlsmith Ball LLP 2000 E. Fourth Street 121 Waianuenue Avenue Suite 205 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Santa Ana, CA 92705 T: 808-935-6644 T: 562-201-6383 F: 808-935-7975 Enclosed are the additional following items: 1. Original and 20 copies of this zoning amendment request; 2. Filing fee in the amount of$250; 3. Listing of surrounding property owners within 300 feet; and' 4. Real Property Tax clearance We respectfully request the County of Hawaii's favorable approval of requested amendments to Ord. 10-32. With Kindest Regards Acknowledged by: ittivASVOA— Doug as R. Bigl y ._ Giampaolo Boschetti President Owner Ikaika Ohana Applicant Mr. Michael Yee September 1, 2020 Page 2 Project to the minimum number of off-street parking stalls required in the Hawai'i County Code (i.e., 1.25 stalls per unit); 2. Condition G—Amend the deadline to grant easement(s) 3. Condition 1 —Delete the requirement to install traffic control devices; 4. Condition P—Delete the requirement to pay fair share contributions, as is customary for affordable housing; and 5. Condition R—Delete the imposition or assessment of Unified Impact Fees. Please direct future communications relating to this matter to the following: On Behalf of lkaika Ohana On Behalf of Giampaolo Boschetti James Rock Steven S.C. Lim UHC H4 LLC Carismith Ball LLP 2000 E. Fourth Street 121 Waianuenue Avenue Suite 205 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Santa Ana, CA 92705 T:808-935-6644 T: 562-201-6383 F: 808-935-7975 Enclosed are the additional following items: 1. Original and 20 copies of this zoning amendment request; 2. Filing fee in the amount of$250; 3, Listing of surrounding property owners within 300 feet; and 4. Real Property Tax clearance. We respectfully request the County of Hawaii's favorable approval of requested amendments to Ord. 10-32. With Kindest Regards Ack iwledged by: 4 Douglas R. Bigley Giarnpaolo Boschet.i President Owner ikaika Ohana Applicant EXHIBIT A A. Owner and the Applicant. The Owner has owned the Property since 2005. The Applicant is experienced in developing affordable residential projects both in the State of Hawai'i and on the mainland US. The Fee Owner's Letters of Authorization are enclosed (Exhibit 1). B. Project History. 1. Rezoning. Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 ("Ord. 10-32") amended the zoning classification for portions of the Property from Single-Family Residential- 7,500 square feet (RS-7.5) to Multiple-Family Residential 1,500 square feet RM-1.5), and from Multiple-Family Residential 1,000 square feet (RM-1) to Multiple-Family Residential 1,500 square feet (RM-1.5). At that time, the Applicant proposed a 100-unit, four-story multiple-family residential complex consisting of six structures comprised of studios, 1- and 2-bedroom units and accessory uses ("Original Project"). Among other things, Condition E of Ord. 10-32, required the completion of the Original Project by May 10, 2015. The Planning Director by letter dated April 20, 2015, granted a 5-year administrative time extension to complete construction of the Original Project to May 10, 2020.The market and development plans have changed, and additional time is needed to complete the proposed affordable housing Project. 2. Prior Efforts at Market Rate Development. Since the adoption of Ord. 10-32 on May 10, 2010, the Applicant has been actively engaged in development of the Property. However, the uncertainty in the financial markets and fluctuations in demand for market-level multiple-family residential units in Hilo caused delays in the Project schedule. 3. Developer's Proposed Revised Project (Exhibit 2). The Developer is proposing a 100% affordable rental housing project consisting of sixty-three 63) affordable housing rental units offered to residents with incomes between 30% and 60% of the County of Hawai'i median income, and one (1) unrestricted manager's unit ("Revised Project"). Financing commitments for the development ofthe Revised Project have been secured, contingent upon the County's approval of this request for time extension and amendments to Ord. 10-32. 4. Annual Report. The Applicant's compliance with the conditions of approval under Ord. 10-32 was summarized in the May 5, 2020 annual report by Ikaika Ohana (Exhibit 3). 4822-3605-9081.2 5. Historic Preservation Review. ASM Affiliates ("ASM") conducted and prepared a 100% surface archaeological field inspection report October 7, 2016) for a portion of the Property (Exhibit 4a). All historic properties on TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048 and 053 have been inventoried (Site 25547), evaluated, and have approved treatments. By letter dated January 3, 2017, the Department of Land and Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Division approved ASM's proposed "no further work" treatment, and no site preservation measures are required (Exhibit 4b). ASM is conducting a field inspection of TMK: (3) 2-4-025:80 ("Parcel 80"), which encompasses the driveway and drainage easement,to determine whether an AIS is required or a field inspection letter report will be sufficient to obtain a "no historic properties affected" determination letter for Parcel 80. 6. Updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report ("TIAR"). The Final Draft TIAR dated June 21, 2019, prepared by Austin, Tsutsumi &Associates, Inc. and submitted with this application analyzed the potential project-related traffic impacts and operations at the intersections of: (1) Kukuau Street and Kupukupu Street, (2) Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street and (3) Kapiolani Street and Hualalai Street. The TIAR concluded that the Level of Service ("LOS") at the study areas for existing 2019 conditions and base year 2021 conditions operate at overall acceptable limits (LOS D or better) during both AM and PM peak hours. The TIAR concluded that all studied intersections are anticipated to operate within acceptable limits based on State and County of Hawai'i standards and no traffic mitigation improvements are recommended Exhibit 5). The current COVID-19 crisis and related shutdown of businesses and schools across the State and County of Hawai'i make taking updated traffic counts impracticable, so in light of these unusual times,the Applicant requests a waiver of the concurrency requirement to prepare an updated TIAR, as required under Section 25-2-46(d), Hawai'i County Code ("HCC"). C. Time Extension and Amendment Requests. The Applicant is seeking a time extension and amendments to the following conditions of approval under Ord. 10-32. Deleted text is [bracketed and stricken] and new text is underscored. 1. Condition E Request- Time extension to complete construction and amend the minimum parking requirements for the Revised Project to the number of parking stalls required in the Zoning Code. E. Construction of the proposed development shall be completed within five(5)yearsfrom the effective date of this ordinance, as amended. Prior to construction, the applicant successors or assigns shall secure Final Plan 4822-3605-9081.2 1 Approvalfor the proposed development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section 25-2-70, chapter 25(Zoning Code). Plans shall identify all existing and/or proposed structures, paved driveway accesses and parking stalls associated with the proposed development. The applicant shall develop parking spaces associated with the proposed development in accordance with the required parking spaces pursuant to Sections 25-4-51 and 25-4-52, Chapter 25(Zoning Code), Hawai'i County Code. parking spaccs up to a maximum of 60% of the required proposed development. Landscaping shall also be indicated on the plans for the purpose ofmitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No. 17(Landscaping Requirements). The applicant shall comply with landscaping requirements for RM zoning. Reason: The Planning Department by letter dated April 20, 2015, granted the Applicant a five-year administrative time extension within which to comply with Condition E (time to complete project construction) from May 10, 2015 to May 10, 2020. The Applicant anticipates that should this amendment be approved,the Developer will submit plans for Plan Approval within 30 days of the effective date of this amendment. Construction of the proposed Revised Project will commence shortly after the issuance of the Final Plan Approval and Building Permits, and be completed within approximately 24 months from the start of construction. The amendment to Condition E also requests deletion of the requirement to develop additional parking spaces up to a maximum of 60% of the required spaces for the Project,which is more than the Zoning Code requirement of 1.25 parking spaces per multiple-family residential unit. In light of the benefits of the proposed affordable rental Project, deletion of this requirement is reasonable and will allow for greater flexibility in site design and approval by the County. Lastly, in response to the request of the adjacent property owner at TMK: (3) 2-4-025:059 for access to Kukuau Street,the Owner and Applicant have agreed to grant an access and utility easement over the Project to access Kukuau Street. Attached is a copy of the letter agreement with the adjacent property owner (Exhibit 6). 1 4822-3605-9081.2 2. Condition G Request-Amend the deadline to grant easement(s). G. The applicant shall subdivide and dedicate to the County a ten (10)foot wide future road widening strip along the entire Kapi'olani Streetfrontage ofParcel 53, prior to Final Subdivision Approvalfor the lot consolidation described in Condition D within twelve(12) monthsfrom the effective date of this ordinance, as amended. Reason: The Applicant received subdivision approval to create the ten 10)-foot wide future road widening strip along Kapi'olani Street as Lot 9-L- 6-A in CON-14-000267, and will prepare the dedication document for the road widening strip for dedication to the County of Hawaii . 3. Condition J Request- Delete the requirement to install traffic control devices. Traffic Division, Department of Public Works, shall be installed by the app Reason: The draft Final TIAR concludes that no traffic mitigation or road improvements are recommended. Additionally,the removal of this requirement will support the development of the affordable rental housing units. 4. Condition P Request- Delete the fair share contribution, as is customary for affordable housing Projects. P. make itsfair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation,fire,police,solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall receipt ofFinal Plan Apprevel-The fair share contribution for each lot the Property shall be based on the actual number of Index(HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a combined value of$7,698.11 per multiplefamily 4822-3605-9081.2 unit). The total amount shall be determined with the payment provisions setforth in this condition. Thefair share contribution per multiple family residential unit(singlefamily residential unit)shall be 1. $3,797.26 per multiple family residential unit facilities; 2. $120.01 per multiple family residential unit to support policefacilities; 3. $369.17per multiple family residential unit to supportfirefacilities; 1. $161.51-per multiple family residential unit to support solid wastefacilities;and 5. $3,217.12.per multiplefamily residential unit 5,110.06persingle family residential unit) to the County to support road and traffic improvements. improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, Reason: In light of developing the Revised Project as affordable rental housing units, the deletion of this condition will reduce the financial burden on the Developer to secure County, State,and/or Federal funding to complete the Revised Project. 5. Condition R Request-Amend the imposition or assessment of Unified Impact Fees. R. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteriafor the imposition ofexactions or the assessment of impact fees, . •. requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. the requirements of 4822-3605-9081.2 3 the United Impact Fees Ordinance shall be waivedfor the Revised Project. Reason: In light of developing the Revised Project as affordable rental housing units, and the time and difficulty in securing County, State, and/or Federal financial resources to fund the Revised Project, this proposed amendment seeks to ensure that development will be able to move forward without additional financial burdens. 4822-3605-9081.2 FEE OWNER'S LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Tax Map Key Nos.: (3) 2-4-025:048,053 and 080 Kukuau 1st, District of South Hilo, Island and County of Hawaii The undersigned is the Fee Owner of the real properties above-identified, and hereby authorizes Ikaika Ohana, a Hawaii non-profit corporation,to be the Applicant related to the time extension and amendment to conditions requests to RezoningOrdinanceNo. 10-23, and to communicate with,apply for, execute and process any andallCounty, State and federal governmental permit applications, and to participate in proceedings related to said real properties. A photostatic or facsimile copy of this - ecuted authorization shall also be considered as effective and valid as the origi l 4._ z _ 2ozz© Giampaolo "Paul" Boschetti 955 Prague Street San Francisco, CA 94112 Exhibit 1 FEE OWNER'S LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION Tax Map Key Nos.:(3)2-4-025:048,053 and 080 Kukuau lst, District of South Hilo, Island and County ofHawaii The undersigned is the Fee Owner of the real properties above-identified,and hereby authorizes his attorney, CARLSMITH BALL LLP to communicate with,apply for,execute and process any and all County, State and federal governmental permit applications,and to participate in proceedings related to said real properties. A photostatic or facsimile copy of this executed authorization shall also be considered as effective and valid as the origin. . 410L 2220 iampaolo "Paul" Bose e 955 Prague Street San Francisco,CA 94112 4, co 7-71,---7-7-7,-__---7,7,71.7,17f-7,717:74 e EH7 Wril: , I g ii© . .., 1,LWOWII im . IP 00 1 titan Aya . z p i- a, I y,a10t .,-,.. y..,„., I,,m 11141. 6 i M g p f Tann ri 4IR2i zz D 9 D 33 Z 3 0eh' O D v nm A m n a> o o; F. y >i m gag; vE ., a D 2132 > 4 C 0 c C mm S I.O e'4. ',.; M1 Ev nn m io g p m-. nm0nmi O 1''D m m ' F47 D _ c' . 3 w . 444*.. 2Q R CG aSm a2 .L_.p < 'c m yoyu gg ;Mcin1A1y -iiipi O 1 6 N m N : > ty " c m 4 m v mH x £__£ Z 1n'ave m ' Ne < EE F. am C Z v p I'¢'.„.D 2 -cm,m.m Dm - ti c eo6,6 m No£a n p 9G5 A SIR n a '+ -y R io an EE T •p p mN ti c$o0v I _ q _ m 1 ,"" a 31 F w r inm-o-s 1 eee.. pz §m o?.. 2 r.-; „x .w 9 a 11 1.° k 6 imGs z SS I 1 a®oiyHi 1 1 I ek x tioD .1 --Y= Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani 1 12 1 s _ ii a o =74 o a ,A0705 IIILO LP Ili I! e , TMK 2-4-025:48,53,80(POR) 1.{ ., t. i0 2610 Pacific Heights Road•Honolulu,Hawaii 96813•(808)829-1426 a n a Corporate:2000 E Fourth Street,Suite 220•Santa Ana,CA 92705•(714)835-3955 May 5,2020 Mr.Michael Yee,Director County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 RE: Annual Progress Report for the Multi-family Residential Development Project located at Kukuau 1St,South Hilo,Hawaii; TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032) (CON-14-000267) Dear Mr.Yee: On behalf of the property owner/applicant,Mr.Giampaolo Boschetti,Ikaika Ohana is submitting this Annual Progress Report for your review and consideration. The following is an update on status of the conditions of approval for Ordinance No.1032,(See: Attachment 1,Ordinance No.1032 dated May 10,2010): General Update Mr. Boschetti has entered into a purchase agreement with the intent to sell the property to A0705 Hilo, L.P. (the"Buyer"). The Buyer is a single purpose limited partnership and an affiliate of Ikaika Ohana. Ikaika Ohana is a nonprofit 501(c)3 with a mission of developing and operating affordable housing. The Buyer will develop the property into 64 units of affordable rental housing with income restrictions between 30% and 60% of area median income. The affordable housing development will be financed through Low-Income Housing Tax Credits(LIHTC),bonds,Section 8 project-based vouchers,an HHFDC Rental Housing Revolving Fund loan(RHRF),and other private sources. In January 2019 the Buyer received an award of vouchers from the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development. In December 2019 the Buyer received awards of LIHTC,bonds,and RHRF financing from HHFDC. The Buyer anticipates starting construction in 3Q 2020. Copies of the awards are available upon request. The sale of the property and transfer of ownership will take place when all of the financial resources are finalized and made available to the development,which will be approximately the same time as the start of construction. Annual Progress Report-May 5,2020 TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032)(CON-14-000267) Exhibit 3 iiiik,.-\. I c y, 2610 Pacific Heights Road•Honolulu,Hawaii 96813.(808)829-1426 t na Corporate:2000 E Fourth Street.Suite 220•Santa Ana,CA 92705.(714)835-3955 Condition A. The applicant(s),its successors or assigns shall be responsiblefor complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. Response A. The Applicant,successors,and assigns will comply with all stated conditions of approval. Condition B. Prior to the issuance ofa water commitment by the Department of Water Supply, the applicant shall submit the anticipated maximum daily water usage calculations as recommended by a registered engineer,and a water commitment deposit in accordance with the "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" to the Department of Water Supply within one hundred and eighty days from the effective date ofthis ordinance. Response B. The Buyer and Applicant are working with the Department of Water Supply on the updated water demand calculation and related fees. Due to the change in the number of units anticipated to be constructed on site the Department of Water Supply will also include a revised summary of fees paid to date,as well as outstanding fees remaining to be paid before an updated water commitment can be issued. Fees required to secure the water commitment will be paid after the Department of Water Supply completes the calculations. Condition C. The applicants shall install a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five(5)feet ofthe water meter on private property,which must be inspected and approved by the Department ofWater Supply prior to the issuance ofa Certificate of Occupancy. Response C. The Applicant will install a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five(5) feet of the water meter on private property. Condition D. The applicant shall secure Final Subdivision Approval to consolidate tax map key numbers 2-4-25:48, 2-4-25:53 and 2-4-25:80 within two(2)yearsfrom the effective date of this ordinance. Response D. The Applicant received Final Subdivision Approval on January 28,2015,(See:Attachment 2, Final Subdivision Approval Letter,dated January 28,2015). Condition E. Construction of the proposed development shall be completed withinfive(5)years from the effective date of this ordinance.Prior to construction, the applicant,successors or assigns shall secure Final Plan Approvalfor the proposed development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section 25-2-70, Chapter 25(Zoning Code), Hawaii County Code. Plans shall identifiy all existing and/or proposed structures,paved driveway accesses and parking stalls associated with the proposed development. The applicant shall develop parking spaces associated with the proposed development in accordance with the required parking spaces pursuant to Sections 25-4-51 and 25-4-52, Chapter 25(Zoning Code),Hawaii County Code.In addition, the applicant shall develop additional parking spaces up to a maximum of60% of the required spaces for the total residential units to be built within the proposed development. Landscaping shall also be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any adverse noise or Annual Progress Report-May 5,2020 TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032) (CON-14-000267) r.,_\\;>\:,....„.,,,, 0 c 2610 Pacific Heights Road•Honolulu,Hawaii 96813•(808)829-1426 O Corporate:2000 E Fourth Street,Suite 220•Santa Ana,CA 92705•(714)835-3955 visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements ofPlanning Department's Rule No. 17 Landscaping Requirements). The applicant shall comply with landscaping requirements for RM zoning. Response E. The applicant received approval for a construction completion time extension pursuant to this condition(See:Attachment 3,Planning Department Letter,dated February 26,2016). The applicant will submit a request for Plan Approval which will include plans identifying all existing and/or proposed structures,paved driveway accesses and parking stalls. The applicant will develop parking spaces associated with the proposed development in accordance with the required parking spaces pursuant to Sections 25-4-51 and 25-4-52,Chapter 25(Zoning Code), Hawaii County Code. Landscaping plans will be included for the purpose of mitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No.17(Landscaping Requirements).The applicant will comply with all landscaping requirements for RM zoning. Request to Amend Condition E Please accept our request to extend the construction completion deadline to May 10,2024. Please accept our request to amend the minimum parking requirement for the affordable housing development to the amounts required in the Hawai'i County Code(i.e.1.25 stalls per unit). Condition F. The applicant shall grant drainage easement(s) through the subject properties to the County ofHawaii. The easement(s)sluill be granted prior to Final Subdivision Approval for the lot consolidation described in Condition D and shall meet with the approval ofthe Department of Public Works. Response F. The applicant granted drainage easements"253" and"254" through the subject properties to the County of Hawaii prior to Final Subdivision Approval per LD.CT. Doc#3929195,(See: Attachment 2,Final Subdivision Approval Letter dated January 28,2015 and Attachment 4,Final Subdivision Plan). Condition G. The applicant shall subdivide and dedicate to the County a ten (10)foot widefuture road widening strip along the entire Kapi'olani Street frontage ofParcel 53,prior to Final Subdivision Approval for the lot consolidation described in Condition D. Response G. The applicant subdivided and dedicated to the County Lot 9-L-6-A,a ten(10)-foot wide future road widening strip along the entire Kapiolani Street frontage of Parcel 53 prior to Final Subdivision Approval,(See:Attachment 2,Final Subdivision Approval Letter dated January 28, 2015 and Attachment 4,Final Subdivision Plan). Condition H. Access at Kapi'olani Street shall be limited to right-turn in and right-turn out movements only. Annual Progress Report-May 5,2020 TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032)(CON-14-000267) 1%.*\:.\ 11/44%. 1 j `.,'_ 2610 Pacific Heights Road•Honolulu,Hawaii 96813 (808)829-1426 C ana Corporate:2000 E Fourth Street,Suite 220•Santa Ana,CA 92705•(714)835-3955 Response H. Access at Kapiolani Street will be limited to right-turn in and right-turn out movements only. Condition I. All driveway connections to Kukuau Street and Kapiolani Street shall conform to Chapter 22, County Streets,of the Hawaii County Code. Response I. All driveway connections to Kukuau Street and Kapiolani Street will conform to Chapter 22, County Streets,of the Hawaii County Code. Condition J. Streetlights and traffic control devices,as may be required by the Traffic Division,Department ofPublic Works, shall be installed by the applicant. Response J. Streetlights and traffic control devices,as required by the Traffic Division,Department of Public Works,will be installed by the applicant. When reviewing our project,we ask that the Traffic Division,Department of Public Works please consider the financial impact and burden of imposing streetlight and traffic control devise installation requirements on an affordable housing project. Condition K. All development-generated runoffshall be disposed ofon site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties.A drainage study shall he prepared and submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance ofFinal Plan Approval.Any drainage improvements, if required, shall he constructed, meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance ofa Certificate of Occupancy. Response K. All development-generated runoff will be disposed of on site and will not be directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study will be prepared and submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval.Any drainage improvements,if required,will be constructed,meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Condition L. All earthwork activity, including grading and grubbing,shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control,of the Hawaii County Code. Response L. All earthwork activity,including grading and grubbing,will conform to Chapter 10,Erosion and Sedimentation Control,of the.Hawaii County Code. Condition M. Ifrequired by the Director ofthe Department of Environmental Management("DEM"),applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the Country sewer system.Applicant shall provide such sewer line or otherfacility improvements as the Director ofDEM may reasonably require,which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation ofimpacts of the proposed project. Annual Progress Report-May 5,2020 TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032) (CON-14-000267) On;-\ k,(I 2610 Pacific Heights Road• Honolulu,Hawaii 96813•(808)829-1426 Corporate: 2000 E Fourth Street,Suite 220••Santa Ana,CA 92705•(714)835-3955C7- anc Response M. If required,the applicant will conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. The applicant will provide sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM reasonably requires from those that the sewer study indicates are advisable for mitigation of impacts from the proposed project. Condition N. A Solid Waste Management Plan shall he submitted to the Department ofEnvironmental Managementfor review and approval prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval. Response N. A Solid Waste Management Plan will be submitted to the Department of Environmental Management for review and approval prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval. Condition O. Should any remains ofhistoric sites,such as rock walls, terraces,platforms, marine shell concentrations or human burials,be encountered,work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources- State Historic Preservation Division (DLNR-SHPD)shall be immediately notified. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearancefrom DLNR-SHPD when itfinds that sufficient mitigative measures have been taken. Response O. DLNR-SHPD has reviewed the proposed project and identified known sites of interest located on,and adjacent to,the property. DLNR-SHPD has indicated that no further action is required related to known sites. If during the course of construction any remains of historic sites,such as rock walls,terraces,platforms,marine shell concentrations or human burials,are encountered, work in the immediate area will cease and the DLNR-SHPD will be immediately notified. Subsequent work will proceed upon clearance from DLNR-SHPD. Condition P. The applicant shall make itsfair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts ofthe property with respect to parks and recreation,fire,police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. Thefair share contribution for each lot shall he based on the actual number of residential units developed. Thefair share contribution in aform of cash, land, facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. Thefair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance,based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index(HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a combined value of$7,698.11 per multiplefamily residential unit($11,996.63 per single family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined with the actual number ofunits according to the calculation and payment provisions setforth in this condition. The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit(single family residential unit)shall he allocated as follows: 1. $3,797.26 per multiple family residential unit($5,784.99 per single family residential unit)to the County to support park and recreational improvements andfacilities; Annual Progress Report-May 5,2020 TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032) (CON-14-000267) fre 11)14 2610 Pacific Heights Road•Honolulu,Hawaii 96813•(808)829-1426 a! t a Corporate 2000 E Fourth Street,Suite 220•Santa Ana,CA 92705•(714)835-3955 2. $120.01 per multiplefamily residential unit($279.07 per singlefamily residential unit)to the County to support police facilities; 3. $369.17 per multiple family residential unit($551.20 per singlefamily residential unit) to the County to supportfire facilities; 4. $164.54 per multiple family residential unit($241.32 per singlefamily residential unit)to the County to support solid waste facilities;and 5. $3,247.12 per multiple family residential unit($5,140.06 per single family residential unit)to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu ofpaying thefair share contribution, the applicant may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation,fire,police,solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development,subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. Response P. Request to Amend Condition P Please accept our request to amend Condition P such that the County will agree to defer the payment of the fair share contribution. Rather than having the fair share contribution due and payable prior to final plan approval,we request approval to pay the County the amount owed for the fair share contribution from the operating proceeds of the project after all other operating expenses,debts,and other approved items are paid. If the Buyer does not complete the transaction to purchase the property,the applicant will make their fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation,fire,police,solid waste disposal facilities and roads prior to the receipt of Final Plan Approval. Condition Q. To ensure that the goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented, the applicant shall comply with the requirements ofChapter 11,Article 1,Hawaii County Code relating to the Affordable Housing Policy. Compliance with Chapter 11 shall be approved by the Administrator ofthe Office ofHousing and Community Development prior to receipt ofFinal Plan Approval and/or Final Subdivision Approval. Response Q. The project will comply with the Affordable Housing Policy. The project will provide 63 rental units for households earning no more than 60% AMI,along with 1 manager's unit. If the Buyer does not complete the transaction to purchase the property,the applicant will comply with the Affordable Housing Policy. Condition R. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteriafor the imposition ofexactions or the assessment of impactfees,conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. Annual Progress Report-May 5,2020 TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032) (CON-14-000267) i laI ..I.,(.(--1 2610 Pacific Heights Road•Honolulu,Hawaii 96813•(808)829-1426 O ay a Corporate:2000 E Fourth Street,Suite 220•Santa Ana,CA 92705•(714)835-3955 Response R. Request to Amend Condition R Please accept our request to amend Condition R such that if Unified Impact Fees are imposed on the project,the County will either waive the fees in support of the affordable housing project,or fees will allowed to be paid from operating proceeds in a manner similar to that described in the request to amend Condition P. If the Buyer does not complete the transaction to purchase the property,the applicant acknowledges that should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fee Ordinance setting for the criteria for the imposition of exactions or the assessments of impact fees,conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fee Ordinance. Condition S. The applicant shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, rules,regulations and requirements. Response S. The applicant will comply with all applicable County,State and Federal laws,rules,regulations and requirements. Request to Amend Condition S Please accept our request to amend Condition S such that if any fees are charged by the County related to the construction of the affordable housing project that the County will allow the fees to be deferred and paid from operating proceeds in a manner similar to that described in the request to amend Condition P. If the Buyer does not complete the transaction to purchase the property,the applicant will pay the fees charged by the County as they are due. Condition T. An annual progress report shall he submitted to the Planning Director prior to the anniversary date ofenactment of the ordinance. The report shall include,hut not be limited to, the status ofthe development and to what extent the conditions ofapproval are being complied with. This condition shall remain in effect until all of the conditions of approval have been complied with and the Planning Director acknowledges thatfurther reports are not required. Response T. This annual progress report is being submitted to the Planning Director which includes,but is not limited to,the status of the development and to what extent the conditions of approval are being complied with. Please accept our request to extend the conditions of approval by 1 year to May 10,2021. This request is in addition to the request to amend the construction completion deadline in Condition E. The additional time will allow us to continue working with the County on the requests contained herein and to continue the development of the affordable housing project. Annual Progress Report-May 5,2020 TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032) (CON-14-000267) 1 f 2610 Pacific Heights Road•Honolulu,Hawaii 96813•(808)829-1426 Corporate:2000 E Fourth Street,Suite 220•Santa Ma,CA 92705.(714)835-3955 Condition U. An initial extension oftime for the performance of conditions within the ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result ofconditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant,successors or assigns,and that are not the result of theirfault or negligence. 2. Granting of the time extension would not he contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. 3. Granting of the time extension would not he contrary to the original reasonsfor the granting of the change of zone. 4. The time extension granted shall he for a period not to exceed the period originally grantedfor performance i.e.,a condition to be performed within one year may be extendedfor up to one additional year). 5. If the applicant should require an additional extension of time, the Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request to the County Council for appropriate action. Response U. The applicant acknowledges the circumstances above in which a time extension for performance of conditions within this ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director. Thank you for your consideration. For further clarification or information, please contact James Rock at jrock@uhcllc.net or(562)201-6383. Sincerely, deal 1 Doug Biglgir President Ikaika Ohana ENCLOSURES:(4) Ordinance No.1032 dated May 10,2010. Final Subdivision Approval Letter,dated January 28,2015 Planning Department Letter,dated February 26,2016 Final Subdivision Plan c:Mr.Allen Yap Annual Progress Report-May 5,2020 TMK(3)2-4-025:048,053,080(Ord No.1032) (CON-14-000267) o- E i1 ESE q1 1 iE E! p[ 1 1. Ordinance No. 1032, dated May 10, 2010 Ii 1osv h; COUNTY OF HAWAII •i.6 ="../ . STATE OF HAWAII r) 4=1::::;,-?':.:.-: 2BILL NO. ( DRAFT' 4)ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP), ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL— 7,500 SQUARE FEET(RS-7.5) AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL— 1,000 SQUARE FEET(RM-1)TO MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- 1,500 SQUARE FEET (RM-1.5) AT KUKUAU 181, SOUTH HILO, HAWAI'I, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY: 2-4-025:048, 053, AND 080. i BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAI`I: a SECTION 1. Section 25-8-33, Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), is amended to change the district classification of property described hereinafter as follows: The district classification of the following area situated at Kukuau ls`, South Hilo, Hawai`i, shall be Multiple-Family Residential— 1,500 square feet(RM-1.5): PARCEL 1 Beginning at the northeast corner of this parcel of land being also the southeast corner of Lot 9- L-5, Land Court Application 1205 and on the southwesterly side of Kapiolani Street, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station a HALAI", being 462.44 feet South and 3,541.34 feet East, thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from true South: 1. 333° 18' 30" 80.80 feet along Kapiolani Street; 2. 49° 56' 206.35 feet along Lot 9-L-7, Ld. Ct. App. 1205; 3. 154° 53'81.36 feet along the remainder of Lot 9-L- 6; 1- 4. 229° 56' 204.05 feet along Lot 9-L-5,Ld. Ct. App. 1205 to the point of beginning and containing an area of 16,130 square feet. PARCEL 2 Beginning at the northwest corner of this parcel of land being also the northeast corner ofLot 9-L-16, Land Court Application 1205 and on the southeasterly side of Kukuau Street, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Government Survey Triangulation Station HALAL",being 804.62 feet South and 2,912.09 feet East, thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from true South: 1. 214° 04' 3` 65.73 feet along Kukuau Street; 2. . 328° 10'83.38 feet along Lots 9-L-3-D and 9-L-4, Ld. Ct. App.1205; 3. 229° 56' 324.99 feet along Lot 9-L-4, Ld. Ct. App. 1205; 4, 328° 10' 79.43 feet along Lot 9-L-5, Ld. Ct. App. 1205; 5. 229° 56' 132.86 feet along Lot 9-L-5, Ld. Ct. App. 1205; 6. 334° 53' 81.36 feet along the remainder of Lot 9-L- 6; 7. 49° 56' 123.25 feet along Lot 9-L-7, Ld. Ct. App, 1205; 8. 328° 10' 410.47 feet along Lots 9-L-7 and 9-L-8, 9-L- 9 and 9-L-10, Ld, Ct. App. 1205; 9. 63° 28' 122.52 feet along L.P. 8063, L.C. Aw. 2663 to Kahue; 10. 75° 46' 154.80 feet along L.P. 8063, L.C. Aw. 2663 to Kahue; 2- a 11. 97° 12' 144.30 feet along L,P. 8063, L.C. Aw. 2663 to Kahue; 12. 148° 10' 430.33 feet along Lots 9-L-19 and 9-L-16, Ld. Ct. App. 1205 to the point of beginning and containing an area of 203,844 square feet. All as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. In accordance with Section 25-2-44, Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition),the County Council finds the following conditions are: Necessary to prevent circumstances which may be adverse to the public health, safety and welfare; or l) Reasonably conceived to fulfill needs directly emanating from the land use proposed with respect to: A) Protection of the public from the potentially deleterious effects of the proposed use, or B) Fulfillment ofthe need for public service demands created by the proposed use. A. The applicant(s), its successors or assigns shall be responsible for complying with all of the stated conditions of approval. B, Prior to the issuance ofa water commitment by the Department of Water Supply, the applicant shall submit the anticipated maximum daily water usage calculations as recommended by a registered engineer, and a water commitment deposit in accordance with the "Water Commitment Guidelines Policy" to the Department of Water Supply within one hundred and eighty days from the effective date of this ordinance. 1 I 3- C. The applicants shall install a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five (5) feet ofthe water meter on private property, which must be inspected and approved by the Department of Water Supply prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. D. The applicant shall secure Final Subdivision Approval to consolidate tax map key numbers 2-4-25:48, 2-4-25:53 and 2-4-25:80 within two (2)years from the effective date of this ordinance. E. Construction of the proposed development shall be completed within five (5) years from the effective date of this ordinance. Prior to construction, the applicant, successors or assigns shall secure Final Plan Approval for the proposed development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section 25-2-70, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawai`i County Code. Plans shall identify all existing and/or proposed structures, paved driveway accesses and parking stalls associated with the proposed development. The applicant shall develop parking spaces associated with the proposed development in accordance with the required parking spaces pursuant to Sections 25-4-51 and 25-4-52, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawai`i County Code. In addition, the applicant shall develop additional parking spaces up to a maximum of 60% of the required spaces for the total residential units to be built within the proposed development. Landscaping shall also be indicated on the plans for the purpose of mitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No. 17 (Landscaping Requirements). The applicant shall comply with landscaping requirements for RM zoning. F. The applicant shall grant drainage easement(s)through the subject properties to the County of Hawai`i. The easement(s) shall be granted prior to Final 4- I r Subdivision Approval for the lot consolidation described in Condition D and shall meet with the approval of the Department of Public Works. G. The applicant shall subdivide and dedicate to the County a ten(10)-foot wide future road widening strip along the entire Kapi`olani Street frontage of Parcel 53, prior to Final Subdivision Approval for the lot consolidation described in Condition D. H. Access at Kapi'olani Street shall be limited to right-turn in and right-turn out movements only. I.All driveway connections to Kukuau Street and Kapi olani Street shall conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawai`i County Code. J.Streetlights and traffic control devices, as may be required by the Traffic Division, Department of Public Works, shall be installed by the applicant. K. All development-generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and shall not be directed toward any adjacent properties. A drainage study shall be prepared and submitted to the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval. Any drainage improvements, if required, shall be constructed, meeting the approval of the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. L. All earthwork activity, including grading and grubbing, shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation Control, of the Hawai`i County Code. M. If required by the Director of the Department of Environmental Management DEM"), applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then 5- applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. N. A Solid Waste Management Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Management for review and approval prior to the issuance of Final Plan Approval. 0. Should any remains of historic sites, such as rock walls, terraces, platforms, marine shell concentrations or human burials, be encountered, work in the immediate area shall cease and the Department of Land and Natural Resources- State Historic Preservation Division(DLNR-SHPD) shall be immediately notified. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from DLNR-SHPD when it finds that sufficient mitigative measures have been taken. P. The applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation, fire,police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall become due and payable prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval. The fair share contribution for each lot shall be based on the actual number of residential units developed. The fair share contribution in a form of cash, land, facilities or any combination thereof shall be determined by the County Council. The fair share contribution may be adjusted annually beginning three years after the effective date of this ordinance, based on the percentage change in the Honolulu Consumer Price Index (HCPI). The fair share contribution shall have a combined value of 7,698.11 per multiple family residential unit($11,996.63 per single family residential unit). The total amount shall be determined with the actual number of 6- units according to the calculation and payment provisions set forth in this condition. 1 The fair share contribution per multiple family residential unit(single family residential unit) shall be allocated as follows: fi 1. $3,797.26 per multiple family residential unit ($5,784.99 per single family residential unit) to the County to support park and recreational 1 improvements and facilities; 2. $120.01 per multiple family residential unit($279.07 per single family residential unit)to the County to support police facilities; 3. $369.17 per multiple family residential unit($551.20 per single family residential unit)to the County to support fire facilities; 4. $164.54 per multiple family residential unit($241.32 per single family residential unit) to the County to support solid waste facilities; and 5. $3,247.12 per multiple family residential unit ($5,140.06 per single family residential unit)to the County to support road and traffic improvements. In lieu of paying the fair share contribution, the applicant may contribute land and/or construct improvements/facilities related to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads within the region impacted by the proposed development, subject to the review and recommendation of the Planning Director, upon consultation with the appropriate agencies and approval of the County Council. Q. To ensure that the goals and policies of the Housing Element of the General Plan are implemented, the applicant shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 11, Article 1, Hawai`i County Code relating to the Affordable Housing Policy. Compliance with Chapter 11 shall be approved by the Administrator of the Office ofHousing and Community Development prior to receipt of Final Plan Approval and/or Final Subdivision Approval. R. Should the Council adopt a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for the imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Fees Ordinance. S. The applicant shall comply with all applicable County, State and Federal laws, rules, regulations and requirements. T. An annual progress report shall be submitted to the Planning Director prior to the anniversary date of enactment of the ordinance. The report shall include, but not be limited to, the status of the development and to what extent the conditions of approval are being complied with. This condition shall remain in effect until all of the conditions of approval have been complied with and the Planning Director acknowledges that further reports are not required. U. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicant, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence. 2. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Code. 3. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. 8- 4. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance(i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to one additional year). S. If the applicant should require an additional extension of time,the Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request to the County Council for appropriate action. Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation. SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of this ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other parts of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon its approval. INTRODUCED BY: COUNCIL MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII Kona Hawai`i Date of Introduction: January 22, 2010 Date of 1st Reading: April 7, 2010 Date of 2nd Reading: April 20, 2010 Effective Date: May 10, 2010 REFERENCE' corm. 652.13 9- 1114‘ RM-I . R5-7.5 44404 1 PARCEL 1 Allis` RM-1 G CG-7.5MULTIFAMILYRESIDENTIAL_1,000 SQ.FT.(RM-1) '. g6 5RS-7.5 TO MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL• 3, 524q 244 E1,500 SQUARE FEET(RM-1.5) 15,130 SQUARE FEET r NACA'P' R5-7. 5400NIPirlitr PARCEL 2r SINGLE•FAMILY RESIDENTIAL• R5- 1 7,500 SQ.FT,(RS-7,5)R5.7,5 TO MULTIPLE•FAMILY RESIDENTIAL- 1,500 SQUARE FEET(RM•1.5) 4A1; , Lam.•d 207,644 SQUARE FEET 604.62 5 r:-; ..?°' I IN 2912.09 E R5-7.5 wSLnr in. :;i.y',r `.•.1', g + iQ t .f'' Fti1 7. RM1 jtIt4y,,,y,„,,‘ „,.• ,,,,41,4„,„14 14-1::.,t ik t.-tip, , ,'i-:,.•,• .. 4 t -7, ` RD-3.75 lk r + Imo§ .f 744.t %°'i - `•, IIV V f lh.t.lilloo 4 .4e'icy. "'.i:tifor, A.',`i O Y c7 i li Oko '0 RS-7.5 40 sRD- 3.75 iI I1$ 1 41I11k4I*•)illitlt$14.< 64. 11!:01111,1111: p,LE 111 53P 5 t N\"'(.\ RD-3.75 P 7,5 7. QJ RD-3,75 5-7. Feet • 0 200 400 800 1,200 1,600 A'; r':'! E '•-+ DMENT TO THE ZONING CODE AMENDING SECTION 25-8-33 (CITY OF HILO ZONE MAP) ARTICLE 8, CHAPTER 25 (ZONING CODE) OF THE HAWAII COUNTY CODE 1983 (2005 EDITION), BY CHANGING THE DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - 7,500 SQUARE FEET (RS-7.5) AND MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - 1,000 SQUARE FEET (RM-1)' TO MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - 1,500 SQUARE FEET (RM-1.5) AT KUKUAU 1ST, SOUTH HILO, HAWAII MAP PREPARED BY: COUNTY OF HAWAII, PLANNING DEPARTMENT TMK:2.4-025:48,53,and 50 DATE:July 31,2009 Glamnaolo"Paul'Boschetti gs OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK . . ' County of Hawai`i Kona, Hawai`i R CE`s D Draft 4) Introduced By: Donald Ikeda MO Pill? 1)1A-Fon VQ Date Introduced: January 22, 2010 AYESNOES ABS EX First Reading: April 7, 2010 Enriques r XU(if, iii=: J-J t,ninti Published: April. 16, 2010 Ford Greenwell X REMARKS: Hoffmann X January 22,, 2010 - Amended to Draft 2.Ikeda X and postponed; February 3, 2010 -Naeole-Beason X Amended to Draft 3 and postponed;Onishi X April 5, 2010 - Public Hearing Yagong X Yoshimoto X Second Reading: April 20, 2010 6 3 0 0 To Mayor: April 28, 2010 Returned: May 10, 2010 ROLL CALL VOTE Effective: May 10, 2010 AYES NOES ABS EX Published: May 17, 2010 Enriques X Ford X REMARKS: V Greenwell X Hoffmann X Ikeda X Naeole-Beason X Onishi X Yagong X Yoshimoto X 5 3 1 0 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing BILL was adopted by the County Council published as indicated above. APPROVED AS TO FO:fill AND LEGA ITY: COUNCIL CHAIRMAN V II-EP •TYCORPORATION CiUNSEL G it---j•----------.CO TY OF HAWAII Date APR 3 0 2010 COUNTY CLERK 184 (Draft 4) Bill No.: thiC-652 .13/PC-62 A ppr ve& isapproved this 10 day Reference: Ord No.: 10 32 of i 20 t%? k25aDA) MAYOR, COUNTY OF H AI`I Ordinances Numbered 10-32, 10-33, 10-34, 10-35, 10-36,& 10-37 I hereby certify that the following Ordinances passed second and final reading at the meeting of the County Council on April 20, 2010, by vote, as listed below: Ordinance 10-32 (Bill 184,Draft 4): An Ordinance Amending Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map), Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code)of the Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), by Changing the District Classification From Single-Family Residential—7,500 Square Feet(RS-7.5) and Multiple-Family Residential— 1,000 Square Feet(RM-1)to Multiple-Family Residential— 1,500 Square Feet(RM-1.5)at Kukuau 151, South Hilo, Hawai`i, Covered by Tax Map Key: 2-4-025:048, 053, and 080. AYES: Council Members Enriques, Greenwell, Ikeda, Onishi,and Chair Yoshimoto—5; NOES: Council Members Ford,Hoffmann, and Yagong—3; ABSENT: Council Member Naeole-Beason— 1; EXCUSED: None. Ordinance 10-33 (Bill 216): An Ordinance Amending Chapter 14, Article 4, Section 14-21 of the Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition,as Amended), Relating to Prohibition of Smoking in Certain Places. AYES: Council Members Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann, Naeole-Beason,and Chair Yoshimoto—5;NOES: Council Members Ikeda,Onishi, and Yagong—3; ABSENT: Council Member Enriques— I;EXCUSED:None. Ordinance 10-34(Bill 217): An Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 09-65,as Amended, . Relating to Public Improvements and Financing Thereof for the Fiscal Year July 1,2009 to June 30, 2010. AYES: Council Members Ford, Hoffmann, Ikeda, Onishi, Yagong, and Chair Yoshimoto—6;NOES: Council Member Greenwell— 1; ABSENT: Council Members Enriques and Naeole-Beason—2; EXCUSED: None. Ordinance 10-35 (Bill 218): An Ordinance to Amend Ordinance No, 09-64, as Amended,the Operating Budget for the County of Hawaii for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30,2010. AYES: Council Members Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann, Ikeda,Onishi, Yagong, and Chair Yoshimoto—7; NOES: None; ABSENT: Council Members Enriques and Naeole-Beason—2; EXCUSED: None. Ordinance 10-36 (Bill 219): An Ordinance to Amend Ordinance No. 09-64, as Amended, the Operating Budget for the County of Hawaii for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30,2010. AYES: Council Members Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann, Ikeda, Onishi,Yagong,and Chair Yoshimoto—7; NOES: None; ABSENT: Council Members Enriques and Naeole-Beason—2; EXCUSED:None. Ordinance 10-37 (Bill 233): An Ordinance to Amend Ordinance No. 09-64, as Amended,the Operating Budget for the County of Hawai`i for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30,2010. AYES: Council Members Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann,Ikeda,Naeole-Beason, Onishi,Yagong, and Chair Yoshimoto—8;NOES:None;ABSENT: Council Member Enriques— 1; EXCUSED: None. 45ennet G. Goodenow County Clerk Hawai`i Tribune-Herald—May 17, 2010) West Hawai`i Today —May 17,2010) Note: The original Digest/Affidavit is attached to Ordinance I0-32. Bill Nos. 184 (Draft 4),216,217, 218,219,233, and 234 I hereby certify that the following Bills passed first reading at the meeting of the Hawai`i County Council on April 7, 2010, by vote as listed below: Bill 184, Draft 4: Amends Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map), Article 8, Chapter 25 Zoning Code)of the Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition), by Changing the District Classification from Single-Family Residential— 7,500 Square Feet (RS-7.5) and Multiple- Family Residential— 1,000 Square Feet(RM-1) to Multiple-Family Residential— 1,500 Square Feet(RM-1.5) at Kukuau 1St, South Hilo, Hawai`i, Covered by TMK:2-4-025:048, 053, and 080; Giampaolo"Paul" Boschetti, Applicant. The applicant shall make its fair share contribution to mitigate the potential regional impacts of the property with respect to parks and recreation, fire, police, solid waste disposal facilities and roads. The fair share contribution shall have a combined value of$7,698.11 per multiple family residential unit($11,996.63 per single family residential unit). AYES: Council Members Enriques, Greenwell, Ikeda,Naeole-Beason, Onishi, and Chair Yoshimoto—6;NOES: Council Members Ford, Hoffmann, and Yagong—3; ABSENT: None; EXCUSED: None. Bill 216: Amends Chapter 14, Article 4, Section 14-21 of the Hawai`i County Code 1983 (2005 Edition, as Amended), Relating to Prohibition of Smoking In Certain Places. Prohibits smoking in all motor vehicles if a person under 18 years of age is in the motor vehicle. AYES: Council Members Enriques, Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann, Ikeda,Naeole-Beason, and Chair Yoshimoto— 7; NOES: Council Member Yagong— 1; ABSENT: Council Member Onishi — 1; EXCUSED: None. Bill 217: Amends Ordinance No. 09-65, as Amended, Relating to Public Improvements and Financing Thereof for the Fiscal Year July 1, 2009, to June 30, 2010; Adds PUBLIC WORKS: Kaumana Drive Flood Protection Project—Federal [$191,000] ($441,0001 and Kaumana Drive Flood Protection Project— County ($350,000); funds shall be provided from Federal Grants Receivable ($250,000) and General Obligation Bonds, Capital Projects Fund-Fund Balance and/or Other Sources ($350,000). AYES: Council Members Enriques, Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann, Ikeda,Naeole-Beason, Onishi, Yagong, and Chair Yoshimoto—9; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; EXCUSED: None. Bill 218: Amends Ordinance No. 09-64, as Amended, the Operating Budget for the County of Hawaii for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010; Increases revenues in Federal Grants— Federal Transit Administration($717,678); appropriates same to Federal Transit Administration. AYES: Council Members Enriques, Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann, Ikeda,Naeole-Beason, Yagong, and Chair Yoshimoto— 8;NOES: None; ABSENT: Council Member Onishi— 1; EXCUSED: None. Bill 219: Amends Ordinance No. 09-64, as Amended, the Operating Budget for the County of Hawai`i for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010; Appropriates revenues in Federal Grants— Sexual Violence Prevention and Planning($9,900); appropriates same to Sexual Violence Prevention and Planning. AYES: Council Members Enriques, Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann, Ikeda, Naeole-Beason, Yagong, and Chair Yoshimoto— 8;NOES: None; ABSENT: Council Member Onishi— 1; EXCUSED: None. 1 Bill 233: Amends Ordinance No. 09-64, as Amended, the Operating Budget for the County of Hawai`i for the Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2010; Appropriates revenues in Fund Balance from Previous Year ($700,000); appropriates same to Transfer to Capital Projects Fund—Geothermal. AYES: Council Members Enriques, Ford, Greenwell, Hoffmann, Ikeda,Naeole-Beason, Onishi, Yagong, and Chair Yoshimoto—9; NOES: None; ABSENT: None; EXCUSED: None. Bill 234: Amends Ordinance No. 09-48, as Amended by Ordinance No. 09-100, Relating to the International Energy Conservation Code. Amends the effective date from May 11, 2010, to January 1, 2011. AYES: Council Members Enriques, Ikeda,Naeole-Beason, Onishi, Yagong, and Chair Yoshimoto—6;NOES: Council Members Ford and Hoffmann—2; ABSENT: Council Member Greenwell— 1; EXCUSED: None. Kenneth G. Goodenow COUNTY CLERK Hawai`i Tribune Herald—April 16, 2010) West Hawai`i Today—April 16, 2010) Note: The original Digest/Affidavit is attached to Bill 184 (Draft 4). 2. Final Subdivision Approval Letter, dadd January 28, 2015 3 1 William P. Kenoi v or„+.,Duane Kanuha Mayor Director Bobby Command if, .;. Deputy Director West Hawaii Office East Hawaii Office 74-5044 Me Keohokalole Hwy 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 County of Hawaii Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 January 28, 2015 Steven S.C. Lim, Esq. Carlsmith Ball, LLP A Limited Liability Law Partnership PO Box 686 Hilo, HI 96721-0686 Dear Mr. Lim: REVISED FINAL PLAT MAP APPLICANT: BOSCHETTI, Giampaolo Consolidation of Lot 169 as shown on Map 72, And Lots 9-L-6, 9-L-14&9-L-15 as shown on Map 9, Land Court Application 1205, Into Lot 169-A, Kukuau 1st, South Hilo, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii TMK: 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080 (Final Consolidation Approval No. CON-14-000267) This is to acknowledge receipt of ten (10)copies of the revised final plat map dated January 2, 2015, and one(1) CAD File of revised final plat for the referenced consolidation application. The revised final plat map creates road widening purposes Lot 9-L-6-A for dedication to the County in compliance with Rezoning Ordinance No. 10 032. Please be advised that we have certified the revised final plat map of which four(4) are enclosed. Copies of the revised final plat map have been circulated to the listed officers for their files. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Ed Cheplic of this department. cerely, DANE KAUHA Planning Director ETC:Inm Coh331planning1publicWdmin Permits DivisionlConsolidation120151FCA-CON-14-0002678oschettiREVFPM 01-28-15 Encs.: 4 Certified Revised FPM (CON-14-000267-Revised) REC'D FEE3 0 5 2015 w•ww.cohplanninadeot.com Han ai i Countv is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer planning a.hamancount\ ea,' Steven S.C. Lim, Esq. Carlsmith Ball, LLP A Limited Liability Law Partnership Page 2 January 28, 2015 xc: Manager, DWS w/Certified Revised FPM Director, DPW wlCertified Revised FPM District Environmental Health Program Chief, DOH w/Certified Revised FPM Real Property Tax Division-Hilo w/Certified Revised FPM Tax Maps and Records Supervisor w/Certified Revised FPM & 1-CAD File Giampaolo Boschetti do Western Apartments Carol Silva, Big Island Land Co., Ltd. Daniel Berg, LPLS, dlb&Associates Katherine Luga, Paralegal, Carlsmith Ball, LLP REZ-09-000103(Ord. No. 10 032) aC 3. Planning Department Letter, dated February 26, 2016 William P.Kenoi 5.):1 +, Duane Kanuha Mayor s ' Director Ts Bobby Command t Deputy Director Ea;;4t _ West Hawai`i Office EastHawai`i Office 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3 Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 County of Hawaii Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 February 26, 2016 Jordan Hart,President Chris Hart and Partners,Inc. 115 N. Market Street Wailuku,HI 96793-1717 Dear Mr. Hart: Change of Zone Ordinance No. 10-32 (REZ 09-000103) Applicant: Giampaolo"Paul"Boschetti Subject: Administrative Time Extension and 2016 Annual Progress Report Tax Map Keys: (3)2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 r 3 This is to acknowledge receipt of your letters dated February 18,2016 requesting an administrative time extension and transmitting the 2016 annual progress report for the above referenced ordinance. An administrative time extension for Conditions E and G was granted by the Planning Department on April 20,2015. The enclosed letter states that the applicant has until May 10,2020 to satisfy these conditions. Thank you for providing the annual progress report.We look forward to reviewing the draft dedication deed for Lot 9-L-6-A once the subdivision has been approved by Land Court. The next annual progress report is due on or before May 10,2017. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact Maija Jackson at 961-8159. Sincerely, 7 -01daL I 1)DUANE KANUHA Planning Director RECEIVED MJJ: P:\wpwn0\Maija\L.etters\Annual Reports\L.Hart-APR2016-REZ09-103.doc d 2016 CHRIS FIART & PARTNERS, INC.Enclosure: April 20,2015 letter LaCaoe Architecture and Planning jor1L 1 ` dJ l'1. i1lD5Z- www.cohplanningdept.cont Ha,vai'i County is anEqual Opportunity Provider and Employer plaintinaci hawaiicounty.eov Sj William P.Kenoi is. Duane Kanuhar• I, Director f Bobby Command DeputyDirector West Hawaii Office East Hawaii office74-5044 Are Keohokalole Hwy 101 Pauahi Street,Suite3 Kailua-Kone,Hawed 96740 County of Hawalit1. Hilo,Howell 96720 Phone(808)323.4770 Phone(808)961-8288 Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742 April 20,2015 Mr. Steven S.C. Lim Carlsmith Ball,LLP P.O.Box 686 Hilo,HI 96721-0686 Dear Mr. Lim: Change of Zone Ordinance No. 10 32(REZ 09-000103) Applicant: Giampaolo"Paul"Boschetti Request: Administrative Time Extension Request Tax Man Kevs: (3)2-4-025:048,053.and 080 This letter is in reply to your letter,dated January 22,2015,made on behalf of your client, Giampaolo"Paul"Boschetti,requesting an administrative time extension to comply with Conditions E(complete construction)and G(dedicate road widening strip)of Ordinance No. 10 32. The letter from the Department of Water Supply dated April 2,2015 confirmed receipt ofthe required water commitment deposit for 97 additional units ofwater. These water commitment are valid until January 31,2016. Condition U ofthe ordinance allows for an administrative time extension for a period not to exceed the period originally granted. Based on the reasons stated in your letter,to comply with Conditions E and G,a five year time extension is granted until May 10,2020. Until the project is developed, and in order to comply with rezoning Condition B and the concurrency requirements of Zoning Code sec. 25-2-46(m),please inform your client to maintain payment of the required annual water commitment deposit to the Department of Water Supply. Please provide the Planning Department with a copy of a receipt or letter from the Department of Water Supply that confirms the annual payment ofthe deposit. APR 212015 wwo.cohptamiinsdept_com flawa!'i County Is an Equal Opportunity Provider andEmployerI ni rp a vaucounty.gov Mr.Steven S.C.Lim Carlsmith Ball LLP Page 2 April 20,2015 Please be informed that should your client need an additional extension oftime to comply with the rezoning conditions,the request and reasons,along with 20 copies of that request shall be forwarded to the Planning Commission with a filing fee. A public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission,who will forward their recommendation to the County Council. If you have any questions,please feel free to contact Maija Jackson at 961-8159 or Earl Lucero at 961-8160 to discuss the matter. Sincerely, Planning Director EML/MJJ:mad P:\wpwin601EARL\Lthers\LREZ0900103timexten.com i 1t r: r-, !ENTCARLSMITHBALLLLP • A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP - , , 2: 011121WAIANUENUEAVENUE P.O.Box 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.935.7975 WWW.CARLSMITH.COM SLIM@CARLSMITH.COM January 22,2015 Duane Kanuha Director Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Attention: Daryn Arai RE: Time Extension Request under Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 Applicant: Giampaolo("Paul")Boschetti TMK No.: (3)2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 (the "Property") Dear Mr. Kanuha: We are in receipt of your January 6,2015 letter deferring action on our request for an administrative time extension, subject to your Department's confirmation of the Applicant's submittal of the water commitment payment to the Department of Water Supply. Enclosed please find a copy of our January 21, 2015 letter to the Department of Water Supply submitting the water commitment deposit in the sum of$14,550.00,for the 97 water units. On behalf of the Applicant,we respectfully request your favorable consideration on the time extension request. Please direct all future communication relating to this matter to our office. Please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have any questions regarding this submittal. Very truly yours, 1r4:444'14- teven S.C. L• SSL/KYL xc: Client Greg Gadd 4824-2751-1329.1 HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI GUAM LOS ANGELES 0964`78 I iz`and Pc1i0.)rtiCARLSMITHBALLLLPPbus1/4111&1)S A LIMITEDLIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP tzl WAIA`UECOEAVENUE T.0.9ox 686 1111.0,HAWAII 96721-0686 10 EPHme 808.935 664.1 FAX 808.935.7975 WWW.CA1tL5 m}I.COM SLIM'CARISMItU.COM R'C E t V F January 21,2015 Mi 21 P?1 3: 42 Quirino Antonio Manager rt ;; tj'.. se,r ;j:_' Department of Water Supply 345 Kekuanaoa Street, Suite 20 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Attn: Ryan Quitoriano Re: Water Commitment Time Extension Rezoning Ordinance No.00-000103 Applicant: Giampaolo("Paul")Boschetti("Applicant") TMK Nos.: (3)2-4-025:048, 053 and 080("Property") Dear Mr.Antonio: By letter dated January 28,2011,the Department of Water Supply("DWS")issued a formal water commitment for 97 additional units of water to allow for the development of the proposed Project on the Property("DWS commitment letter")until January 31,2014. The DWS commitment letter further acknowledged receipt of the$14,550.00 water commitment deposit and confirmed that the Property has one(1) fully paid water service unit. This letter will formally request the DWS'approval for an additional time extension of the water commitment for the 97 additional units of water until January 31,2016. The Applicant continues to move forward with the development of the Project,albeit on a much slower development schedule than earlier anticipated,which is the result of the current global,national,and local economic conditions that have proved even more significant for the real estate development business. The Applicant has diligently moved forward on development of the Project,by obtaining final consolidation approval on May 14,2014(CON-14-000267), initiating processing of the Land Court Petition for Consolidation,and working towards compliance with the various conditions of approval under Rezoning Ordinance No.00-000103, including preparation of the construction plans for the subdivision roadway and utilities. Enclosed please find the Applicant's submittal of the water commitment deposit to the DWS in the amount of$14,550.00, for the 97 water units. Based on prior discussions with your staff,the tate payment of the water commitment deposit will not invalidate the water commitment for the additional 97 units of water. 1 i HONOLULU • Into • KONA MAUI GUAM SAIPAN LOS ANGELES 3 Quirino Antonio January 21,2015 Page 2 Please direct all future communication relating to this matter to our office. Please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have any questions regarding this request. Thank you for your consideration, Very truly yours, Steven S.C. Li SSL:KYL Enclosure xc: Client Ep 11 4. Final Subdivision Plan . 1 E{ tt I i I 111 i N U a W5W= O. 01 Q Ym OI O' n N. N 3Q o x O a_ n 11 i 0 u im n n n to a• I 'O _ Q 4 H Qon O J zO1- W U F F F -1 1 mr z xo to 0 J v 3o Qm < e 4, QKWto n a cc oe cc n U 1 <G U U o iI*4P W 0 - - , , 14 ,I• 0 H J p O p 60 PP II—I a x v) x iCemoJ O o 21 ¢U 0oi a o O Z m C Z o O in O Y N o' m S QJ z 0 pt 0 J N_ o ory 77S J F N O Z 0 Z ¢ Oa N O ii '^ An. O Q U• ¢ I-- O K OO2O 4 OS N 9mj` i O W H O 5.. Al”., w j cr• 1 Y r •< V Y Yu N a 4 f a O e,H NN 7 • i O z ICuo W Z 1,,,_;; a Erg% •gi ti: 3i3 m 3 u 04O = N Is:. 3 3o« ii% s3W`og (g =, ai i it c. ` a T. 1/S o 1.f 001 NII 31Y]5 C m'<n U --- n ocoi tn W o r NINON 3/1N! z C U coo o - N zLL5 Y Z z o s o p 15 \co,n lin am%°' o ,s 8 I 911,1 n ?•1!'13 St. O N rc a o MO' h iiilSPP s ' II- e s O o a Sia N-0,`",,..., o oJ6co o cit- cam • \ r !\ Ti, v 410 qq rr •o s,,o i1::c..‘,,, l'''C 6);,..,,J i o.pr o o. 1'(\G ^N\ T,1 6C13/ 1'. . 00 r a`1 /said• @r .. - \\ I . / gn0)1% eRs cp a ex. 1 g 1 a of Vdlzi' 0 f 0% S\der a3 wyo? S • s cf, o3if! 1 any /' so% ii I F• c: I aZ rco V RC-0342 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Acquisition of Drainageway Lands Project TMKs:3-2-4-25:48, 50, 52, 53, 59 por., 67 por., 78 por., 80 por., 93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.) f 1V41 F - KUkUau 1st Ahupua`a South Hilo District P x+`'fir 49 w Island of Hawai`i PREPARED BY: J. David Nelson, B.A., Matthew R. Clark, B.A., and Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. PREPARED FOR: SSFM International, Inc. 501 Sumner Street - Suite 620 Honolulu, HI 96817 August 2006 RECHTMAN CONSULTING, LLC HC 1 Box 4149 Kea'au, Hnvv00749-971: phone: (808) 96o-7636 fat: (808) 443-0065 e-mail: bob(d rechtmanconsulting.com ARCtiA;uwuICAt.,CUI;!URAL, AND HIS`I'l)RICAI,STUDIES Exhibit 4a Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Acquisition of Drainageway Lands Project TMKs:3-2-4-25:48, 50, 52, 53,59 por., 67 por., 78 por., 80 por., 93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por.,109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.) Kukuau 1' Ahupua'a South Hilo District Island of Hawai`i RECHTMAN CONSULTING RC-0342 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of SSFM International, Inc., on behalf of their client, the County of Hawaii, Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted an archaeological inventory survey and limited cultural assessment of lands that encumber the existing drainage system created by the State of Hawaii for the Mohouli Housing Project TMKs:3-2-4-25:48,50,52,53,59 por.,67 por.,78 por., 80 por.,93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.) located in Kukuau 1" Ahupua`a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. The County of Hawaii is planning to acquire the lands and easement for the existing drainageway. The purpose of this study is to document the presence of any historic properties (including traditional cultural properties)that might exist within the project area, assess the significance of any such resources and provide a statement of impact to any such resources as a result ofthe proposed land acquisition project. On May 23, and June 6 and 7, 2006, Mathew R. Clark, B.A., J. David Nelson, B.A., Mark J. Winburn, B.A.,Olivier M. Bautista, B.A.,and Liz Hauani`o performed an intensive pedestrian survey of the project area, under the direction of Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. As a result of the current inventory survey a single archaeological site(SIHP Site 25547)was recorded on TMK:3-2-4-25:48. Site 25547 is an elongated enclosure located within a raised bedrock crack formation to the north of an excavated drainage channel. Site 25547 contains three modified sections consisting of stacked cobbles. This site is probably Historic in origin, and its use likely coincided with the use of several Historic features noted on TMKs:3-2-4-25:54 and 132, outside of the current project area, along the same raised bedrock formation as Site 25547. A long time Hilo resident, Kenneth Bell, indicated that the location of these features corresponded to the location of several wooden shacks that served as residences until the 1940s. SIHP Site 25547 is considered significant under Criteria D for the information it has yielded regarding early twentieth century use of the study area. However, as SIHP Site 25547 was recorded in detail and there is virtually no excavation potential, no further work is recommended. This site is not considered a traditional cultural property and there were no specific natural or cultural resources or cultural beliefs and practices identified relative to the land within the current study area. ii RC-0342 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION 4 BACKGROUND STUDIES 6 Previous Archaeology 6 Culture-Historical Background 6 CURRENT PROJECT EXPECTATIONS 12 FIELDWORK METHODS AND RESULTS 12 Findings 12 CONSULTATION 17 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION, TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS,AND ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION 18 REFERENCES CITED 19 FIGURES 1. Project area location 2 2. TMK:3-2-4-25 showing current study parcels 3 3. View to the east of vegetation along Kapiolani Street 5 4. View to the east of vegetation on TMK:3-2-4-25:48 along drainage channel. 5 5. Hilo Bay showing ahupua'a.7 6. Portion of Register Map 1561 showing current study parcel. 10 7. Project area plan view. 13 8. SIHP Site 25547 plan view.14 9. SIHP Site 25547 Section 1, stacked rock along bedrock edge, view to north. 15 10. SIHP Site 25547 Section 1, collapsed rock stack across bedrock formation, view to west.15 11. SIHP Site 25547 Section 2, interior face of rock stack, view to north. 16 12. SIHP Site 25547 Section 2, exterior face of rock stack, view to southwest. 16 13. SIHP Site 25547 Section 3, view to south. 14 iii INTRODUCTION At the request of SSFM International, Inc., on behalf of their client, the County of Hawaii, Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted an archaeological inventory survey and limited cultural assessment of lands that encumber the existing drainage system created by the State of Hawaii for the Mohouli Housing Project TMKs:3-2-4-25:48,50,52,53,59 por.,67 por., 78 por., 80 por.,93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.) located in Kukuau 1st Ahupua`a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. The County of Hawaii is planning to acquire the lands and easement for the existing drainageway. The purpose of this study is to document the presence of any historic properties (including traditional cultural properties)that might exist within the project area, assess the significance of any such resources and provide a statement of impact to any such resources as a result of the proposed land acquisition project. This report is intended to accompany an Environmental Assessment (EA) being prepared in compliance with Chapter 343 Hawaii Revised Statues, as well as fulfilling the requirements of the County of Hawaii Planning Department and the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division DLNR-SHPD)with respect to permit approvals for land-altering and development activities. In the Hawaii Administrative Rules(HAR 13§13-275-2)that govern the regulatory activities of the State Historic Preservation Division,a definition of historic property is provided. Historic property" means any building, structure, object, district, area, or site,including heiau and underwater site,which is over 50 years old. This definition should not be confused with the definition of Historic Property contained in the Federal legislation and its implementing regulation(Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and 36 CFR 800,respectively),where Historic Property is defined as a resource"listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places." The difference being that in the state-used definition ALL buildings, structures, objects, districts, areas,or sites older than fifty years are historic properties and need to be assessed as such. In the Federally used definition, ONLY those buildings, structures, objects, districts, areas, or sites that are determined to be significant are considered Historic Properties. The criteria for the evaluation of significance contained in the Hawaii Administrative Rules generally follows that which was promulgated by the Federal government, with the addition of Significance Criterion E, which is not contained in the Federal evaluation criteria.To be significant the resource must possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and meet one or more of the following criteria: A Be associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns ofour history; B Be associated with the lives of persons important in our past; C Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work of a master;or possess high artistic value; D Have yielded,or is likely to yield,information important for research on prehistory or history; E Have an important value to the native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group of the state due to associations with cultural practices once carried out,or still carried out, at the property or due to associations with traditional beliefs,events or oral accounts— these associations being important to the group's history and cultural identity. 1 RC-U3l_ C I i o 1 oo / Il I true yt! i+ ; 'tfe)VVA x (r Mokupane w a2183000mN oo wT BM 9Arvut ,Cocoanut Pt wry 1rr1 1 - f w1 l 1..J. -`t/` y Ix1-, ' y ISI t n a S. 1 i*,' r t.. `• ` y amr 14,ii, ' , 'ijniuk•AAaka` -1 a • 1t g1r ,4 ` Q tim a i _T.a r r r;; 1e asp4, -: 4", <fr 1• 1 w3 .ra, E... t l 0 i / alai ParK r e C} apa. -7 V r-5'wf;,-1 4 f• q o cct uea loc num t . ,. _ 1 o s so y4 1 nett 1 L '` $.s,-'S 4 i 5' i Cs 'V A. "ti 3 '1 _a 1 i' N., 044 / h fNn Cof am sfr ( Y 0 • 9y 1P, I P r 1 PROJECT AREA -''' L r'` F ' k k i i , if* m II I km7 Island of\Hawai`i {`I R Figure 1.Project area location. 2 RC-0342 14 Study parcels 1 .1._. ±"\--''''s 1\\ Figure 2. TMK:3-2-4-25 showing currenstudy parcels(48,50,52, 53,59 por.,67 por., 78 por., 80 por.,93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por.,and 126 por.). RC-0342 A working definition of Traditional Cultural Property is as follows: Traditional cultural property"means any historic property associated with the traditional practices and beliefs of an ethnic community or members of that community for more than fifty years. These traditions shall be founded in an ethnic community's history and contribute to maintaining the ethnic community's cultural identity. Traditional associations are those demonstrating a continuity of practice or belief until present or those documented in historical source materials,or both. The origin of the concept of Traditional Cultural Property is found in National Register Bulletin 38 published by the U.S. Department of Interior-National Park Service. "Traditional" as it is used, implies a time depth of at least 50 years, and a generalized mode of transmission of information from one generation to the next, either orally or by act. "Cultural" refers to the beliefs, practices, life-ways, and social institutions of a given community. The use of the term "Property" defines this category of resource as an identifiable place. Traditional Cultural Properties are not intangible,they must have some kind of boundary; and are subject to the same kind of evaluation as any other historic resource, with one very important exception. By definition, the significance ofTraditional Cultural Properties should be determined by the community that values them. PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION The current project area consists of approximately ten acres(TMKs:3-2-4-25:48,50,52,53,59 por.,67 por.,78 por., 80 por., 93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.)located in Kukuau Pt Ahupua`a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii(see Figures 1 and 2). Elevation within the project area ranges from approximately 90 to 120 feet above sea level. The area is a combination of open grassland, disturbed forestland, and developed residential land. The mauka portion of the project area follows a narrow drainage created by the State of Hawaii for the Mohouli Housing Project. The drainage crosses several developed residential parcels and Popolo Street,and outlets onto five undeveloped parcels(TMKs:3-2-4-25:48,50,52, 53, and 93)that are subject to periodic flooding.These parcels have been altered by bulldozing in most areas, save for strip in the central portion of TMK:3-2-4-25:48 and the northeastern corner of TMK:3-2-4-25:53 where a raised bedrock ridge formation was left intact. The area where the drainage channel lets out is bordered to the east by Kapiolani Street; to the south by an undeveloped residential parcel and two developed residential parcels,to the north by a proposed road right-of—way and an undeveloped residential parcel, and to the west by a driveway (proposed Kupukupu Street)and two developed residential parcels (see Figure 2). The project area is located directly across the street from the Hilo Police Station. Soils in the study area are classified as Keaukaha extremely rocky muck(rKFD),a dark brown and strongly acidic soil that is approximately eight inches thick,and that possesses rapid permeability, moderate runoff,and a slight erosion hazard(Sato et al. 1973).This soil has developed over pahoehoe lava flows that originated from Mauna Loa Volcano approximately 750 to 1,500 years ago(Wolfe and Morris 1996). Vegetation within the project area ranges from thick to fairly open(Figures 3 and 4), and is dominated by secondary growth forest containing a variety of exotic trees including mango(Mangifera indica), African tulip tree (Spathodea campanulata), Alexandra palm (Archontophoenix alexandrae), banyan (Ficus microcarpa), avocado(Persea americano),ti(Cordylinefruticosa),hala(Pandanus tectorius),rose apple(Syzygiumjambos), and Java plum(Syzygium cumini). Ground cover consists primarily of ferns,grasses, and vines such as wedelia Wedelia trilobata), maile pilau(Paederiafoetida), and California grass(Brachiaria mutica),thorny wait-a-bit Caesalpina decapetala), and philodendron (Philodendron sp.) (Terry and Yoshida 2006). The existing vegetation pattern indicates that the study area has undergone substantial alteration in the past including but not limited to mechanized clearing and earth moving in the low-lying areas. 4 RC-0342 O a 1i • T c.v.' fit s 1i jj. yR 1 Soo i ZA. yamc .. r s t... d' r{ tit Figure 3.View to east ofvegetation along Kapiolani Street. 71 fi s,;,r Al, • 4' !7'y`r F ..Z ?1a. .M 6 4 0 of w' • R '1 Pa ". T g 1:110 ;.411 fi1J 1' sem s i' y; 4: "- # 1, ',; 4t*, '' k /4 11 , 'n - 4.-. 4.!;: 4; '''-,, - .V r` 0 t tit. t% R Alp. y 4`e-,;"*.,ji ; y i.,: T ,l+p+* f c sc-;\ • 6 ); ,ry• i r. h. I its v '1" 4.. _ {' 7,p t , 'L 4.,of 1 1 Figure 4.View to east ofvegetation on TMK:3-2-4-25:48 along the drainage channel. 5 RC-0342 BACKGROUND STUDIES This section of the report describes and synthesizes prior archaeological,cultural,and historical studies that are relevant to the current project area; and provides a brief culture-historical background of Kukuau 15`Ahupua'a and the general South Hilo District. Previous Archaeology At the turn ofthe century,Thrum(1907a, 1907b)and Stokes(Stokes and Dye 1991)documented heiau sites for the Island of Hawai`i.Thrum(1907a)lists 16 heiau for Hilo District,none of which were located in Kukuau 1st Ahupua`a.Thrum notes: Of the heiaus ofthe district of Hilo little evidence oftheir existence now remains,so complete has been their destruction, but though their stones are scattered, much of their history is yet preserved.(Thrum 1907a:40) One early archaeological study of East Hawai`i was conducted by Hudson (1932) for the B. P. Bishop Museum. He noted that, "there was an important village and trading center around Hilo Bay" (1932:20), but related that,"no archaeological remains are to be found within the town of Hilo itself except a few stones which are said to have been taken from heiaus..."(1932:226). More recent archaeological studies conducted to the south of the current project area in Waiakea Ahupua'a Borthwick et al. 1993; Escott 2004; Hunt and McDermott 1993; Maly et a1.1994; Rechtman and Henry 1998; and Spear 1995) have identified, almost exclusively, Historic archaeological remains associated with the Waiakea Sugar Plantation,which operated in Waiakea Ahupua'a between 1879 and 1947(Rechtman and Henry 1998:5). Common features recorded during these studies included stacked rock mounds,enclosures, core-filled walls,and parallel wall alignments used for irrigation and for lining the plantation's railroad tracks. To the north of the current project area, the B. P. Bishop Museum conducted research and an archaeological inventory survey at two locations along the Alenaio Stream for a flood damage reduction study Kelly and Athens 1982). Investigations along the proposed routes of their study area did not identify any archaeological sites. However, two locations were noted as having the potential to contain subsurface cultural deposits,one near a small plantation house,and another adjacent to the Old Hilo Jail. Within the ahupua'a of Kukuau, Hunt and McDermott (1993) conducted an archaeological inventory survey of the Pirainako Street extension.Their study area also crossed Waiakea and Ponahawai ahupua`a south and west of the current project area.As a result of that survey eleven sites containing ninety-seven features were recorded within the proposed road alignment. All of the recorded sites and features were determined to be Historic in origin and associated with the Waiakea Sugar Plantation.Three volcanic glass flakes recovered from an excavation beneath one ofthe Historic features also suggested possible Precontact use ofthe area. Additionally, Scientific Consultant Services (Spear et al. 1996) conducted an archaeological inventory survey of the then proposed Mohouli Connector Road that crossed the ahupua`a of Kukuau 15` and 2"d, Ponahawai,and Punahoa. The 100-foot wide corridor extended for approximately 6,600 feet southwest(mauka) of the current project area. The investigation found the land to be as much as three-quarters previously cleared by bulldozer,and no archaeological sites were recorded. Culture-Historical Background This section summarizes the general cultural history of Hilo and more specifically the history of Kukuau 1" Ahupua`a. For a more in-depth historical background of Hilo the reader is referred to Kelly et al. (1981),Maly 1996),and McEldowney(1979). The earliest historical knowledge of Hilo comes from legends written by Kamakau(1961)of a 16th century chief`Umi-a-Liloa(son of Liloa)who at that time ruled the entire island of Hawai`i. Descendants of Umi and his sister-wife were referred to as "Kona" chiefs, controlling Ka`u, Kona, and Kohala, while descendants of Umi and his Maui wife were "Hilo" chiefs, controlling Hamakua, Hilo, and Puna (Kelly et al. 1981:1). According to Kamakau(1961)both sides fought over control of the island,desiring access to resources such as feathers, mamaki tapa, and canoes on the Hilo side; and wauke tapa, and warm lands and waters on the Kona side(c.f.Kelly et al. 1981:3). 6 RC-0342 Sometime near the end of the 16`h century or early in the 17th century,the lands of Hilo were divided into ahupua'a that today retain their original names (Kelly et al. 1981:3). These include the ahupua'a of Pu'u'eo, Piihonua, Punahoa, Ponohawai, Kukuau and Waiakea(Figure 5). The design of these land divisions was such that residents could have access to all that they needed to live, with ocean resources at the coast, and agricultural and forest resources in the interior. However, only Piihonua and Waiakea provided access to the full range of resources stretching from the sea up to 6,000 feet along the slopes of Mauna Kea (Kelly et al. 1981:5). Vir EPUNAk1hp`..U919ilyyk• mAkALgUl HILL BAY p‘,•°' JP•/1 vy:- Q 0. %. J ILI of PI 01.1.0 j tri Qo r N WAIAKEA i 1 j 0 1 2 3k SCALE Figure 5.Hilo Bay showing ahupua'a(from Kelly et al. 1981:2). Historical accounts(McEldowney 1979)place the current study area in a zone of agricultural productivity. As Isabella Bird recorded upon arriving in Hilo in 1873: Above Hilo, broad lands sweeping up cloudwards, with their sugar cane, kalo, melons, pine- apples,and banana groves suggest the boundless liberality ofNature.(Bird 1964:38) Handy and Handy(1972)also describe the general region as an agricultural area: On the lava strewn plain of Waiakeia and on the slopes between Waiakea and Wailuku River, dry taro was formerly planted wherever there was enough soil. There were forest plantations in Panaewa and in all the lower fern-forest zone above Hilo town along the course of the Wailuku River.(Handy and Handy 1972:539) Maly(1996)refers to a 1922 article from the Hawaiian Language newspaper,Ka Nupepa Ku`oku'a,where planting on pahoehoe lava flats is described. There are pahoehoe lava beds walled in by the ancestors in which sweet potatoes and sugar cane were planted and they are still growing today. Not only one or two but several times forty (mau ka'au) of them. The house sites are still there, not one or two but several times four hundred in the woods of the Panaewa. Our indigenous bananas are growing wild, these were planted by the hands of our ancestors.(Maly 1996:A-2) As part of an archaeological assessment study, Maly (1996) conducted historical research for the lands of Wainaku, Ponohawai, Waiakea, and Pi`ihonua (to the north and south of the ahupua'a of Kukuau). Maly discussed the significance of the use of the Hawaiian word wai in the place names: Ponohawai, Waiakea, Wainaku, and Wailuku (River). According to Maly, the word wai (water) can be likened to the Hawaiian concept of wealth"waiwai," stressing its cultural importance(Maly 1996:A-2). In this context,the importance of Hilo can be better understood, with its copious streams that fed taro pondfields and its numerous fishponds Maly 1996) 7 1 RC-0342 The ahupua`a of Kukuau 1st and 2nd likely provided a wide variety of valuable subsistence resources to the Precontact Hawaiians residing there and ali`i who claimed the land. Settlements in this land were focused on the coast with the exception of some residences being established among the inland agricultural fields. The ahupua`a residents utilized the uplands in accordance to specific elevation zones (McEldowney 1979). These land use zones reflected different environments where specific natural resources were readily acquired and where varying degrees of modification of the terrain produced a surplus of dryland and wetland agricultural goods. Thus,the project area lands being part of the Upland Agricultural Zone (above 50 feet elevation)were probably subjected to extensive cultivation during prehistoric times.McEldowney states: The extent of this zone varies in early journals, but most confirm that an expanse of unwooded grasslands or a "plain" behind Hilo town extended up to approximately the 1,500 ft elevation (i.e., the edge of the forest). Scattered huts, emphasized by adjacent garden plots and small groves of economically beneficial tree species, dotted this expanse. The cumulative effects of shifting agricultural practices(i.e.,slash-and-burn or swidden), prevalent among Polynesian and Pacific peoples, probably created and maintained this open grassland mixed with pioneering species and species that tolerate light and regenerate after a fire... With remarkable consistency,early visitors to Hilo Bay describe an open parkland gently sloping to the base ofthe woods.This open but verdant expanse, broken by widely spaced"cottages"or huts,neatly tended gardens, and small clusters of trees... Estimates as to the extent of this unwooded expanse ranged from between five and six miles (Goodrich 1826:4)to between three and four miles (Coan 1882:29) above the coast or village,with most falling between four or five miles. The constituents of gardens and tree crops in the village basically continued in the upland except that dry-land taro was planted more extensively and bananas were more numerous...This same pattern occurred between Waiakea Pond and the Pana`ewa Forest in the four or five miles of open country dominated by tall grasses. Here stands of kukui Aleurites mouccana), pandanus, and mountain apple became more conspicuous, with large areas of dryland taro planted in rocky crevices on the younger Mauna Loa flows...(McEldowney 1979:18-20). In Precontact Hawaii, all land, ocean and natural resources were held in trust by the high chiefs(ali`i 'al ahupua'a or ali`i 'ai moku). The use of land, fisheries and other resources were given to the hoa`aina (native tenants)at the prerogatives of the ali`i and their representatives or land agents(konohiki),who were considered lesser chiefs. The wealth of resources and population in Hilo, according to Hunt and McDermott (1993), are reflected in the chiefly controls held over the District,especially the ahupua'a of Waiakea.Kamehameha I lived for a time in the Hilo area and built many of his large war canoes at Hilo. The availability of large koa trees in the forests of the Hilo area made it an ideal place to fashion canoes. When Vancouver visited Hilo in 1794, he found Kamehameha I stocking food and making war canoes for his conquest of the Hawaiian Islands. Kamehameha I had substantial land holdings in the Hilo area. At his death Kamehameha I gave his Waiakea land holdings to his son Liholiho. Kukuau 1St and 2nd were given to his trusted haole advisors John Young and Isaac Davis(Kelly et al. 1981:11). By 1845, the Hawaiian system of land tenure was being radically altered, and the foundation for implementing the Mahele `Aina was set in place. As the Mahele evolved, it defined the land interests of Kauikeaouli (King Kamehameha III), some 252 high-ranking Ali`i and Konohiki, and the Government. As a result of the Mahele, all land in the Kingdom of Hawaii came to be placed in one of three categories: (1) Crown Lands (for the occupant of the throne); (2) Government Lands; and(3) Konohiki Lands (cf. Indices of Awards 1929). The"Enabling"or"Kuleana Act"of the Mahele(December 21, 1849)further defined the frame work by which hoa`aina(native tenants)could apply for,and be granted fee-simple interest in"Kuleana"lands cf. Kamakau in Ke Au Okoa July 8 and 15, 1869; 1961). The Kuleana Act also confirmed the rights of hoa aina to access, subsistence, and collection of resources necessary to their life upon the land in their given ahupua`a("Enabling Act",August 6, 1850-HAS DLNR 2-4). According to Maly (1996), before receiving their awards from the Land Commission, the native tenants were required to prove that they lived on the land, or that they cultivated the land for a living. They were not permitted to acquire wastelands or lands that they cultivated"with the seeming intention of enlarging their lots." 8 RC-0342 Once a claim was confirmed, a survey was required before the Land Commission was authorized to issue any award. While the commoners were required to provide proof of land use and habitation, the land claims of royalty rarely included any land use documentation.For the commoners,this"requirement ofproof'produced a series of volumes of registry and testimony-the"Buke Mahele". During the Mahele of 1848, the sons of John Young and Isaac Davis received large portions of Kukuau ahupua'a; smaller parcels were awarded to both native Hawaiians, and foreign recipients (see following discussion). One of Davis' sons (G.D. Hueu) received a large portion of Kukuau 2"d Ahupua'a(3,450 Acres, LCAw. 8521-B)and Young's son(Keoni Ana)received 9,360 acres of Kukuau 15"Ahupua'a(LCAw. 8515,see discussion below)(Kelly et al. 1981:40). The current study area is a portion of LCAw. 8515 to Keoni Ana, and is located just north of the northern border of LCAw. 2663 to Kahue and LCAw. 2402 to Keaniho (Figure 6). The Mahele records for Kahue and Keaniho provide the following documentation of land use in the vicinity of the current project area during the middle part ofthe nineteenth century: Kukuau,December 16, 1847 LCA 2663 Kahue[Native Register Volume 8:675] The land measures 50 fathoms by 30 fathoms November 7, 1848 LCA 2446[corrected to 2663] Kahue[Foreign testimony Volume 5:3] Haoleopunui sworn,said he knew the house lot to be situated on the Ahupua'a of Kukuau 1" and bounded on the west by Kanakaholokai's ground, on the North by the Ahupua'a of Kukuau,on the East by Aiko's enclosure, on the south by a piece of waste land. There are three houses on it,all belonging to Kahue. He received the plot from Puna in the year 1840,since which time he has held it without dispute LCA 2663.Kahue[Foreign Testimony Volume 5:80] Kamakani sworn says, I am an old resident on Kukuau, Hilo and know the kuleana of Kahue. It is bounded on the Hilo Paliku side by the kuleana of Keaniho, on all the other sides by the Konohiki. He received it from Kaiana in 1844,and Kaiana from Kaunuohua before Nahienaena's death(1836). December 18, 1847 LCA 2402.Keaniho[Native Register Volume 3:483] Greetings to you John Ii, and all the Land Commissioners: We have heard we should petition by the end of the year,therefore we hereby petition for our house lot. I Keaniho, of Ponahawai, and Kahue, of Kukuau. Here is the diagram of our house lot. This is finished. Also,there is a hala grove at Waiakea, a portion is pahoehoe lava and a portion is a'a lava.The boundaries are unequal: 60 by 160 by 110.This is finished.This diagram will be kept until the time when we meet.(Maly 1996:20) November 7, 1848 LCA 2402 Keaniho [Foreign Testimony Volume 5:4] 2402 and 2663 Keaniho and Kahue(Wednesday November 8, 1848) Kaapa sworn, deposed that the land of Keaniho and Kahue was on the Ahupua'a of Ponahawai on the ili of Kanewahineiki, consists of a building lot and planting lot. Is bounded on the west by kalo fields,on the North by the ground of Hawahewa and Kaapa, on the East by strip of waste land, and on the south by a piece of waste land. It is not enclosed and has 3 fields for cultivation, 1 dwelling house belongs to Keaniho. The land was given to him by Hoolulu and Kaholowaiia in the year 1835. Since which time he has always resided thereon.Kahue not decided,sent for. Lahaina sworn,deposed that the evidence of Kaapa was true. 9 RC-0342 r'gi t' \ z V-> '''.----- \- ".•11111r1 1: 1 • i•.. c.et 4CPI 2 \ Ch/," -("5 ::.: 2.0‘-1:7c/ry- ......./4, Civd.'7' 4,,-i. k i / I.i. /, . ,.2.....e2 /4 i • .. 4 1 7" i 161r/ V E/ 4i0.vi....1re i., lk 4*4.:7-, / .1.•4%. . 4., e.......--.4.4. 1/4...::4" 4,-.4,. ka. / 4 i• i 0 4„,,,,,, c.,"' 1,,, ,a... . --2 Th„,..„• l .- \----- 44tt i I .7i1' k•- _....__— Si(.. f 2...0 1. 15/.5- W r ,44; .../ 1 ffeC./7/./170 7,'. .`.1.•ore..4.• ,--- 0. 4111 rep/.g Oveinceo....4"$/4 o-' if ,. 443,,,,/ft- \ i f 5 i.$r t, r t---- N.„ , 4, 4.1. A 4.,', 1•:' 4„,. 1. rProjectarea Ty,131z.tITOFty r."1..„ 30>vkj, •.---- A 41 wer LAN„,11 1 Surveyor 1 c...--.....:' 4....,,,TOWN\ A.N ID VI CIN1T,Yiir., 7,...:,,II -) Map and Survey by E D. BaldwinIPuueoSectionfrorriivIonsarrat'a I • t..c. ..4' 240.2. VVainaku Map IS91 1- ..------------- j I 5 cae 1 Z400 Traced From C., ,;f. urvey ReS-Maf No-15611 A..---•.... Figure 6.Portion of Register Map 1561 showing current study area(from Maly 1996:21). 10 RC-0342 November 8, 1848 LCA 2402 Keaniho[Native Testimony Volume 4:407] Kaapa sworn and deposed: I know,there in the Ahupua'a of Ponahawai in the land parcel of Kanewahineiki... Moving to the parcel in Waiakea and testimony received- Kahue sworn and deposed; I know that there in the Ahupua'a of Waiakea are 2 cultivated fields(kihapai)that I gave to Keaniho,3 cultivated fields remain mine,I gave them [two fields]to him in 1840.No one has disputed our claim.(Maly 1996:20,22) These testimonies indicate the use of lands adjacent to the kuleana parcel's boundaries. Through the testimony of Keaniho it is apparent that kalo (taro) was being cultivated to the west of LCAw. 2402, that wasteland was present to the south and east, and that the grounds of Hawahewa and Kaapa were present to the north(which should be the location of LCAw. 2663). According to Kahue's testimony, wasteland was present to the south of LCAw. 2663 (which should be the location of LCAw. 2402), Kanakaholokai's ground was present to the west,Kukuau Ahupua'a to the north,and Aiko's enclosure was present to the east. Most of the kuleana claims were awarded to native Hawaiians, but a Chinese individual, Y. Aiko (1799- 1895), received a 1.01-acre parcel in Kukuau (LCAw. 3205) (Hunt and McDermott 1993). In Kahue's testimony he mentions that his parcel is bounded on the east by Aiko's enclosure. However, no information pertaining to the location of LCAw. 3205 was evident on any of the cartographic resources reviewed for the current study.It is uncertain if Aiko's LCAw.parcel was also the location ofthe Aiko's enclosure located to the east of LCAw.2663. Interestingly,Aiko is remembered as an early Chinese immigrant to Hawaii who was involved in the first sugar production in the islands (Dorrance and Morgan 2000). Aiko arrived in the islands in mid-1830s from China. Two men were responsible for Aiko's arrival from China: Atai, a Chinese businessman/retail store co- owner in Honolulu, and William French (1765-1861), a prominent local businessman with experience in the sugar industry. The two started a sugar mill in Waimea, Kauai in 1835. The goal of their operation was to make sugar on shares" (splitting the proceeds between the grower and the miller). This was successful, using harvests of native grown cane. French and Atai were emboldened to import four sugar masters, and a second mill from Canton,China(Dorrance and Morgan 2000:15, 16). One of the four Chinese sugar masters brought to Hawaii by French and Atai was Aiko. When the mill in Waimea, Kauai shut down,Aiko went to the Island of Hawaii. In 1837, Aiko settled in South Kohala on land that Governor Kuakini(1791-1844)planted in cane.He erected and operated a mill on shares with Kuakini until 1843, when he moved to North Kohala to run Kuakini's plantation located there (Dorrance and Morgan 2000:17). Aiko had supervised both these operations since 1839. During this time, Governor Kuakini, with Chinese help, started another mill in Hilo on Ponahawai Hill. A year later in 1844, Aiko moved there with his family. Then after the Mahele of 1848, he acquired considerable property of his own. In 1849, Aiko went back to the North Kohala plantation,closed it down in 1850,and returned to Hilo.For the next two decades,until 1869,he lived there and devoted his time to helping several other Chinese run the mill and plantation at `Amauulu Dorrance and Morgan 2000:17). In 1867 a Hilo merchant and investor,Capt. Thomas Spencer(1812-1884)purchased `Amauulu Plantation from Aiko.The business consisted of a mill and 4,000 acres, 1 mile north ofHilo.Production was reported to be 500 tons of sugar in 1872 and in 1880; this amount was doubled under Aiko's management. But in 1884, this small plantation's lands were added to those of Hilo Sugar Company, and "Amauulu Plantation no longer existed"(Dorrance and Morgan 2000:102-103). According to Maly(1996:26),the period of development between 1870s and 1890s saw the rapid change in Hilo town and growth of the sugar industry. Hilo soon grew to become the second largest city in the Hawaiian Islands (McEldowney 1979:39). Vast tracts of land were under sugarcane cultivation, which was remarkably labor-intensive, and took advantage of an immigrant labor force. Prior to 1930, breaking of ground to plant sugarcane was done by mules. By 1935 most areas (where possible) were plowed by tractors to a depth of six inches. The fields were not irrigated but rather relied on Hilo's high rainfall. Cane yields varied with rainfall. The fertility was good, but many fields were rocky (Kelly et al. 1981:121). Sugar processing plants in the vicinity of Kukuau 1st Ahupua'a included the Waiakea Mill Company to the east, and Hawaii Mill Company in 11 RC-0342 Pi`ihonua Ahupua`a, to the west. The Waiakea Mill Company, whose land holdings included portions of Kukuau, operated from 1897 through 1946, and was one of the largest sugar companies to operate in Hilo. When the company's 30-year lease of Waiakea lands expired in 1918, the government under homestead laws, subdivided a large tract of land into hundreds of lots granted to homesteaders in 1919 (Kelly et al. 1981:121). Commercial sugar production lasted in Kukuau until the mid twentieth century,at which time many ofthe fields were converted to pasturage associated with cattle ranching. CURRENT PROJECT EXPECTATIONS Based on soil substrate and elevation,the current project area falls within the Upland Agricultural Zone (Zone II) as defined by McEldowney (1979). The archaeological expectations for the zone include Precontact agricultural features and habitation sites.However,based on results of the previous archaeological studies in the vicinity (Hunt and McDermott 1993, and Spear et al. 1996) it appears that nineteenth and twentieth century mechanized cultivation may have impacted any earlier features and resulted in an overlay of more recent agriculture-related sites or ancillary habitation sites.Despite the high frequency of land clearing in the Hilo Bay area,the historical trend in prior studies in the area indicates that some features may be extant. FIELDWORK METHODS AND RESULTS On May 23, and June 6 and 7, 2006, Mathew R. Clark, B.A., J. David Nelson, B.A., Mark J. Winburn, B.A., Olivier M.Bautista,B.A.,and Liz Hauani`o performed an intensive pedestrian survey ofthe project area,under the direction of Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. The limits of the area were marked on a map provided by SSFM International, Inc. The field investigators walked east/west transects spaced at 10-meter intervals across the entire main body of the project area.The drainage ditch was then explored from its eastern to western end.With the exception of localized dense patches of hapu`u and California grass, ground visibility was adequate for locating all archaeological resources. When archaeological resources were encountered they were plotted on a map ofthe study parcel using a tape and compass,then cleared of vegetation,mapped in detail using a tape and compass, photographed, and described using standardized site record forms. The recorded archaeological features were grouped into sites based on their perceived proximity,functionality, and temporality. Findings As a result of the current inventory survey a single archaeological site(Site 25547)was recorded on TMK:3-2- 4-25:48 (Figure 7). Site 25547 is an elongated enclosure located within a raised bedrock crack formation to the north of the excavated drainage channel. Site 25547 that contains three modified sections consisting of stacked cobbles. This site is probably Historic in origin, and its use likely coincided with the use of several Historic features noted on TMKs:3-2-4-25:54 and 132,outside ofthe current project area,along the same raised bedrock formation as Site 25547. These features included a core-filled wall segment, several modified outcrops, an enclosure, modified lava blisters,and an early 20th century trash dump.A long time Hilo resident,Kenneth Bell see Consultation section below), indicated that the location of these features corresponded to the location of several wooden shacks that were lived in until the 1940s. Site 25547 is described in detail below and its location,relative to the project area boundaries and the nearby habitation features,is shown in Figure 7. SIHP Site 25547 Site 25547 consists of a twenty-four-meter long by two-meter wide section of a natural pahoehoe bedrock crack that has been modified in three sections with stacked cobbles (Figure 8). The site is located north of the excavated drainage channel,in the central portion of TMK:3-2-4-25:48 (see Figure 7).The modifications to the bedrock crack consist of two sections of stacked cobble wall that cross the crack at the eastern and western ends of the feature(Sections 1 and 3), and a third section that lines the bedrock crack's northern edge in the central portion of the feature (Section 2). These modifications appear designed to restrict access into or out of the bedrock crack. The bedrock ridge/crack formation continues both east and west of the site area. Most of Site 25547 consists of unmodified vertical bedrock that stands one to two meters tall.Ground surface within the area enclosed by the modifications consists of level soil covered by a thick mat of organic debris.No cultural debris was observed within or around Site 25547, but based on its proximity to an area of known twentieth century habitation, it is likely that the site is of similar antiquity. Site 25547 may have functioned as enclosure designed to keep small animals (i.e. pigs, dogs, etc.) within or out of the enclosed space. Each modified section of Site 25547(Sections 1,2,and 3)is described in detail below. 12 RC-0342 t i N 1 i Current project areaiii; Edge of raised i i .1. bedrock formation i 1 I ) i l •\ / TMK parceliiiiboundaries I‘ i _,{ i N i i ii i i i i i 0 20 40 Scale in meters LCAw.2663 i trite 25547 P 41t!G i i i t 1, \ i k Kapiolani Street Area of historic habitation features Police Station Figure 7.Project area plan view. 13 RC-0342 60) M (70) Web _ Section 3 N N true Thick vegetation boulders \ 0 1 2 Scale in meters QGrp 111, 120) • liro)/ 11,41S0)"do Section 2 , ttVertical bedrock walls 100) 130) y f 35) Section 1 ) 100) 140) A "!*' I- Steep slope Stacked Figure 8. SIHP Site 25547 plan view. 14 RC-0342 Section 1 Section 1 consists of an L-shaped stacked wall located at the eastern end of the site(see Figure 8).Beginning at its western end,the wall runs northeast along the northern edge of the crack for 2.8 meters,then turns southeast and extends 1.4 meters across the crack to a 1.4 meter tall vertical bedrock face along the southern edge of Site 25547. Section 1 stands up to 1.2 meters tall by 0.7 meters wide (Figure 9), but the segment that crosses the crack is mostly collapsed, standing only 0.4 meters tall along its interior by 0.8 meters tall along its exterior Figure 10). keitf a S. ' p;': 0" R.. !'tif + s I eK. 3 q k i' y a I s.* M t Y. xe Ir7w 5wfid. Y la a Figure 9. SIHP Site 25547 Section 1,stacked rock along bedrock edge,view to the north. i4 4 , 1 e - 1 .vvii, ...,. .. , ,. frk,.. 4 di.y' , L. x t r ' 44 r 4 it It'4. Atio..4 - * Y '''a,, "- --,,ov Figure 10. SIHP Site 25547 Section 1,collapsed rock stack across bedrock formation,view to west. 15 RC-0342 Section 2 Section 2 consists a linear stacked wall located along the northern edge of the crack, approximately half way between Sections 1 and 3 (see Figure 8). Section 2 measures four meters long, stands three to four courses tall, with an interior height of 0.9 meters(Figure 11),an exterior height of 0.4 meters(Figure 12),and a width of 0.7 meters. Section 2 appears to have been constructed as a barrier to compensate for a low section of bedrock along the northern edge ofthe crack.Vertical bedrock is present to the east and west of Section 2. t s 1• 10ya. efix. f•, .(7p.,. t* v!14.: 4 Figure 11.SIHP Site 25547 Section 2, interior face of rock stack,view to north. I/`1 i. itr . T t. Figure 12.SIHP Site 25547 Section 2,exterior face of rock stack view to southwest. 16 1 RC-0342 Section 3 Section 3 consists of a stacked wall that crosses the width of the bedrock crack at the western end of Site 25547 see Figure 8). Section 3 is linear, running northwest/southeast, and measuring 3.1 meters long by 0.6 meter wide,by 0.8 meter tall(2 courses)(Figure 13).This section is in poor condition due to collapse caused by dense vegetation,but it was likely designed to restrict access at the western end ofthe site. I Yt In 4' _ yi, , •.`d\ •w 1 * 4'4' + F td S ' .ist , c ,1 a S rite- ,, '". ;. P-4, 4f:/' / 1. ' s' i, st' AliS '''. 4e4:'''';‘i4".- s1:: 1'I 4* " may, i ' df• R M 1,/ 04 " 74',, "'aa :.: 41014.,,,,,i47: .; ... alitv.: T,*'.....,, , , 0.1,;,011w......t t .. 4 Ag1 j QP, +i',*•I .04, - , Figure 13. SIHP Site 25547 Section 3;view to south. CONSULTATION As part of the current study an effort was made to obtain information about any potential traditional cultural properties and associated practices that might be present,or have taken place within the project area.The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (East Hawai`i) and the Hilo Hawaiian Civic Club were contacted but had no information relative to the existence of traditional cultural properties in the immediate vicinity of the current project area; nor did they provide any information indicating current use of the project area for traditional and customary practices. Mr. Kenneth Bell was also consulted with respect to past land use in and around the current project area. Mr. Bell has participated in many oral historical projects concerning the development of the Hilo area. He was born in 1915 and is of mixed Hawaiian/Caucasian ancestry. Mr. Bell's father, William John Bell, was superintendent of the Railroad,and Carpentry and Blacksmith Shops for the Waiakea Mill Company. The Bell family lived on Kilauea Avenue during the years employed by the Mill. The senior Bell retired in 1940. Kenneth was well acquainted with the former Waiakea Mill and Plantation operation, having spent time with his father riding rails throughout the system of fields. Kenneth Bell eventually went to work for HT&T (a division of C.Brewer)and retired as Superintendent of the Bulk Sugar Plant in 1980.Presently Mr.Bell lives in Hilo on Makani Circle. When asked in a telephone interview what he knew of the current project area, he explained that there was a scattering of a few "wooden shacks" that served as residences (not associated with the Waiakea Mill Company) in the portion of the project area fronting Kapiolani Street. This is the same location where clusters of historic refuse were observed immediately to the north ofthe project area. 17 RC-0342 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION, TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION The above-described archaeological site is assessed for its significance based on criteria established and promoted by DLNR-SHPD and contained in the Hawai`i Administrative Rules 13§13-284-6. This significance evaluation should be considered as preliminary until DLNR-SHPD provides concurrence. For resources to be considered significant they must possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and meet one or more ofthe following criteria: A Be associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns of our history; B Be associated with the lives of persons important in our past; C Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,period,or method of construction; represent the work of a master;or possess high artistic value; D Have yielded,or is likely to yield,information important for research on prehistory or history; E Have an important traditional cultural value to the native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group ofthe state due to associations with traditional cultural practices once carried out,or still carried out,at the property or due to associations with traditional beliefs, events or oral accounts—these associations being important to the group's history and cultural identity. While it is the practice of the DLNR-SHPD to consider most historic properties significant under Criterion D at a minimum, it is clear that traditional cultural properties by definition would also be significant under Criterion E. A further analytical framework for addressing the preservation and protection of customary and traditional native practices specific to Hawaiian communities resulted from the Ka Pa`akai 0 Ka'aina v Land Use Commission court case. The court decision established a three-part process relative to evaluating such potential impacts: first,to identify whether any valued cultural, historical, or natural resources are present; and identify the extent to which any traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised; second, to identify the extent to which those resources and rights will be affected or impaired; and third, specify any mitigative actions to be taken to reasonably protect native Hawaiian rights if they are found to exist. SIHP Site 25547 is considered significant under Criteria D for the information it has yielded regarding early twentieth century use of the study area. However, as SIHP Site 25547 was recorded in detail and there is virtually no excavation potential, no further work is recommended. This site is not considered a traditional cultural property and there were no specific natural or cultural resources or cultural beliefs and practices identified relative to the land within the current study area. 18 RC-0342 REFERENCES CITED Bird,I. 1964 Six Months in the Sandwich Islands.University ofHawai`i Press,Honolulu. Borthwick D.,J.Collins,W.Folk,and H.Hammatt 1993 Archaeological Survey and Testing of Lands Proposed for Research and Technology, Lots at the University of Hawai`i at Hilo (TMK:2-4-01:40 and 157). Report on file DLNR-SHPD,Kapolei. Coan,Titus 1882 Life in Hawaii.New York:Anon Randolph&Co. Dorrance,W.,and F.Morgan. 2000 Sugar Islands: The 165-Year Story ofSugar in Hawai`i. Mutual Publishing,Honolulu. Escott,G. 2004 An Archaeological Inventory Survey on Approximately 258 Acres of Land for the University of Hawaii-Hilo Mauka Lands Development, Waiakea Ahupua`a, South Hilo District,Island of Hawai`i,Hawai`i(TMK;3-2-4-01:122). Scientific Consultant Services, Inc.Report 361-2.Prepared for PBR Hawaii,Honolulu. Goodrich,J. 1926 Notice of the Volcanic Character of the Island of Hawaii. American Journal ofScience Series 1,No. 11:2-7 Handy,E.S.C.,and E.Handy 1972 Native Planters in Old Hawai`i. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233. Bishop Museum Press,Honolulu.(With M.K.Pukui) Hudson,A. 1932 Archaeology ofEast Hawaii, Volume I.Honolulu:B.P.Bishop Museum. Hunt,T.,and M.McDermott 1993 Archaeological Inventory Survey: Pu'ainako Street Extension Project;Lands of Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2, and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. Prepared for Okahara and Associates,Engineering Consultants,Hilo,Hawaii. Kamakau,S. 1961 Ruling Chiefs ofHawaii.Honolulu:The Kamehameha Schools Press. Kelly,M.,B.Nakamaru,and D.Barrere 1981 Hilo Bay:A Chronological History; Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawai`i. B.P.Bishop Museum Press,Honolulu. Kelly,M.and S.Athens 1982 Archaeological and Historical Studies for the Alenaio Stream Flood Damage Reduction Study, Hilo, Hawaii. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for U.S.Army Engineer District,Pacific Ocean Division. Maly,K.,A.Walker,and P.Rosendahl 1994 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Waiakea Cane Lots, Portion of Parcel 6, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:2-4-57:01). PHRI Report 1370- 122993.Submitted to Roy Takemoto,Hilo. 19 RC-0342 Maly,K. 1996 Appendix In: Archaeological Assessment Study Hilo Judiciary Complex Project, Lands of Wainaku, Ponohawai, Piihonua, and Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i TMK:2-6-15:1,2;2-6-16:2;2-4-49:18,19;2-2-15:33;2-4-1:12).Paul H.Rosendahl,Inc., Hilo.PHRI Report 1721-061496.Prepared for State of Hawai`i,Honolulu. McEldowney,H. 1979 Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design:Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo, Hawai`i. Manuscript on file, Department of Land and Natural Resources- State Historic Preservation Division. Rechtman,R.,and J.Henry 1998 University of Hawaii-Hilo Kawili Street Development Archaeological Inventory Survey TMK: 3-2-4-01:5), Waiakea Ahupua`a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc., Report 1877-100998, Hilo, Hawaii. Prepared for Inaba Engineering,Inc.,Hilo,Hawaii. Sato,H.,W.Ikeda,R.Paeth,R.Smythe,and M.Takehiro,Jr. 1973 Soil Survey of the Island of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and University of Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. Washington,D.C.:Government Printing Office. Spear,R. 1995 Data Recovery Excavations for Sites 50-1-35-19431, 19432, 19433, 19434, Lands of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i (TMK:2-4-57:01). Scientific Consultant Services,Inc.Honolulu,HI. Spear,R.,J.Robins,and W.Fortini,Jr. 1996 An Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Proposed Mohouli Connector Road. Ahupua`a of Kukuau 1 and 2, Ponahawai, and Punahoa, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i. Prepared for Y.Hahn,Ph.D. Stokes,J.F.and Dye 1991 Heiau ofthe Island ofHawai`i:A Historical Survey ofNative Hawaiian Temple Sites. 2. Bishop Museum Press,Honolulu. Terry,R.and L.Yoshida 2006 Botanical Survey,Mohouli Drainage Area.TMKs 3-2-4-25:48,49,50,52,53,59,and 80 porn.), Hilo, Island of Hawai`i. Prepared for SSFM International Inc. by Geometrician Associates,LLC. Thrum,T. 1907a Tales from the Temples.Hawaiian Almanac andAnnualfor 1908. 1907b Heiau and heiau sites throughout the Hawaiian Islands. Haiwaiian Almanac and Annual for 1908. Wolfe E.,and J.Morris 1996 Geologic Map of the Island of Hawai`i. Geologic Investigations Series Map I-2524-A. U.S.Department ofthe Interior,U.S.Geological Survey. 20 PURR T.YOUNG CHAIRPERSON LINDA LLNGL Y'•t9 5 D i,.,- BOARDOP LAND ANDNTURAL ResoURcv GOVERNOROF HA I d Y.=),,g.:VX-s-,.X/t`COMPASSIONONWATERRESOURCEMANAOEMENT tt'Ya \\ tj Il 4/. 4„ ROBERT K.MASUDA S f ' DEPUTYDIRECTOR•LAND GG f 10 pE. N i iD J J) tw DEAN NAKANO d/ i qt f 2 ACTINO DEPUTYDIRECTOR•WATER 1 t dfl D.-e%R u.RA`' AQUATIC RESOURCESC3iBOATINGANDOCEANRECREATION BUREAUOF CONVEYANCES COMbHSSION ON WATER RESOURCEMANAOEMETT CONSERVATORANDCOASTALLANDSSTATEOFHAWAIICONSERVATIONANDRESOURCESENFORCEMENT ENGWEQRDNO DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES FORESTRYAND WILDLIFESIorHISTORICPRESERVATION KAHOOLAWEISLANDRESERVECOMMISSION STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION LAND 601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD,ROOM 555 STAIRPARKS KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 September 28, 2006 Dr.Robert Rechtman LOG NO: 2006.3257 Rechtman Consulting,LLC DOC NO: 0609JT83 HC 1 Box 4149 Archaeology Keaau,HE 96749 Dear Dr.Rechtman: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— An Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Acquisition of Drainageway Lands Project Kukuau 1't Ahupua`a, South Hilo District,Island of Hawaii TMK: (3) 2-4-025: Var. Thank you for submitting the above referenced report by Nelson, Clark & Rechtman (2006) for our review and•comment. The report presents the results of an archaeological inventory survey of TMKs 3-2- 4-025: 048, 050, 052, por. 053, por. 067, por. 078, por. 080, 093, por. 106, por. 107, por. 108, por. 109, por. 110, por. 115, and por, 126 for the County of Hawai`i. One historic property was identified. Rechtman Consluting, LLC, assessed site 25547 as significant under criterion D, and recommended no further work on the site. The report is of good quality and meets the requirements of the historic preservation review process. We accept the recommendation for site 25547 and determine that it is significant under criterion D, for its information content.We also agree that the site has been thoroughly documented and that no further work is required. The report is therefore accepted, and the historic preservation review process for these parcels completed. Please contact Dr.Julie Taomia at 808-327-3691 if you have questions or concerns. Aloha, mr ante hi -n,Administrator e Historic Preservation Division JT:gvf Exhibit 4b R( -0;42 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Acquisition of Drainageway Lands Project TMKs:3-2-4-25:48, 50, 52, 53, 59 por., 67 por., 78 por., 80 por., 93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.) KukuAhupua'a1stAhuua`a 11;_'-' South Hilo District Island of Hawaii PREPARED BY: J. David Nelson, B.A., Matthew R. Clark, B.A., and Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. PREPARED FOR: SSFM International, Inc. 501 Sumner Street- Suite 620 Honolulu, HI 96817 August 2006 RECHTMAN CONSULTING, LLC I It 4 Koa'au, l I pll+ tx: (808),;k,0, 7t30 t:l\: (SOS) 443-. \05 e-mail: I,c,h'e>rechtmo , . ,It inK.<om AM' 'i+AE!•>,ta,+.'A ,GtrP,'ItOtAi. `N H : I *iI AI SO II.F Exhibit 4a Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Acquisition of Drainageway Lands Project TMKs:3-2-4-25:48, 50, 52, 53,59 por., 67 por., 78 por., 80 por., 93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por.,109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.) Kukuau I Ahupua'a South Hilo District Island of Hawaii RECHTMAN CONSULTING RC-0342 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of SSFM International, Inc., on behalf of their client, the County of Hawaii, Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted an archaeological inventory survey and limited cultural assessment of lands that encumber the existing drainage system created by the State of Hawaii for the Mohouli Housing Project TMKs:3-2-4-25:48,50.52,53,59 por.,67 por.,78 por.,80 por.,93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 pot., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.) located in Kukuau 1" Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. The County of Hawai'i is planning to acquire the lands and easement for the existing drainageway. The purpose of this study is to document the presence of any historic properties(including traditional cultural properties)that might exist within the project area, assess the significance of any such resources and provide a statement of impact to any such resources as a result of the proposed land acquisition project. On May 23,and June 6 and 7, 2006, Mathew R. Clark, B.A., J. David Nelson, B.A., Mark J. Winburn, B.A.,Olivier M. Bautista,B.A.,and Liz Hauani`o performed an intensive pedestrian survey of the project area, under the direction of Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. As a result of the current inventory survey a single archaeological site(SlFIP Site 25547)was recorded on TMK:3-2-4-25:48. Site 25547 is an elongated enclosure located within a raised bedrock crack formation to the north of an excavated drainage channel. Site 25547 contains three modified sections consisting of stacked cobbles. This site is probably Historic in origin,and its use likely coincided with the use of several Historic features noted on TMKs:3-2-4-25:54 and 132,outside of the current project area, along the same raised bedrock formation as Site 25547. A long time Hilo resident, Kenneth Bell, indicated that the location of these features corresponded to the location of several wooden shacks that served as residences until the 1940s. SIHP Site 25547 is considered significant under Criteria D for the information it has yielded regarding early twentieth century use of the study area. However, as SIHP Site 25547 was recorded in detail and there is virtually no excavation potential, no further work is recommended. This site is not considered a traditional cultural property and there were no specific natural or cultural resources or cultural beliefs and practices identified relative to the land within the current study area. ii RC-0342 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION 4 BACKGROUND STUDIES 6 Previous Archaeology 6 Culture-Historical Background 6 CURRENT PROJECT EXPECTATIONS 12 FIELDWORK METHODS AND RESULTS 12 Findings 12 CONSULTATION 17 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION,TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS,AND ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION 18 REFERENCES CITED 19 FIGURES I. Project area location 2 2. TMK:3-2-4-25 showing current study parcels 3 3. View to the east of vegetation along Kapiolani Street 5 4. View to the east of vegetation on TMK:3-2-4-25:48 along drainage channel. 5 5. Hilo Bay showing ahupua'a. 7 6. Portion of Register Map 1561 showing current study parcel. 10 7. Project area plan view. 13 8. SIHP Site 25547 plan view. 14 9. SIHP Site 25547 Section 1,stacked rock along bedrock edge, view to north.15 10. SIHP Site 25547 Section 1,collapsed rock stack across bedrock formation,view to west.15 11. SIHP Site 25547 Section 2, interior face of rock stack, view to north.16 12. SIHP Site 25547 Section 2,exterior face of rock stack, view to southwest. 16 13. SIHP Site 25547 Section 3,view to south. 14 iii INTRODUCTION At the request of SSFM International, Inc., on behalf of their client, the County of Hawaii, Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted an archaeological inventory survey and limited cultural assessment of lands that encumber the existing drainage system created by the State of Hawaii for the Mohouli Housing Project TMKs:3-2-4-25:48,50,52,53,59 por.,67 por.,78 por.,80 por.,93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.) located in Ktikuau I' Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. The County of Hawaii is planning to acquire the lands and easement for the existing drainageway.The purpose of this study is to document the presence of any historic properties(including traditional cultural properties)that might exist within the project area, assess the significance of any such resources and provide a statement of impact to any such resources as a result of the proposed land acquisition project. This report is intended to accompany an Environmental Assessment (EA) being prepared in compliance with Chapter 343 Hawaii Revised Statues, as well as fulfilling the.requirements of the County of Hawaii Planning Department and the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division DLNR-SHPD)with respect to permit approvals for land-altering and development activities. In the Hawaii Administrative Rules(HAR 13§13-275-2)that govern the regulatory activities of the State Historic Preservation Division,a definition ofhistoric property is provided. Historic property" means any building, structure, object, district, area, or site,including heiau and underwater site,which is over 50 years old. This definition should not be confused with the definition of Historic Property contained in the Federal legislation and its implementing regulation (Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act and 36 CFR 800,respectively),where Historic Property is defined as a resource"listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places." The difference being that in the state-used definition ALL buildings, structures, objects,districts,areas,or sites older than fifty years are historic properties and need to be assessed as such. In the Federally used definition, ONLY those buildings, structures, objects, districts, areas, or sites that are determined to be significant are considered Historic Properties. The criteria for the evaluation of significance contained in the Hawaii Administrative Rules generally follows that which was promulgated by the Federal government,with the addition of Significance Criterion E, which is not contained in the Federal evaluation criteria.To be significant the resource must possess integrity of location, design, setting. materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and meet one or more of the following criteria: A Be associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns ofour history; B Be associated with the lives ofpersons important in our past; C Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work ofa master,or possess high artistic value; D Have yielded,or is likely to yield,information important for research on prehistory or history; E Have an important value to the native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group of the state due to associations with cultural practices once carried out,or still carried out, at the property or due to associations with traditional beliefs,events or oral accounts— these associations being important to the group's history and cultural identity. RC-fi;4.2 Te' L ` C 1 f a t i r- MF4uoaae Vt k10h OOfV CY A 2183000m i ray Gxoa=.ue : cs , 1 ;, + A ad. H tit(,4 4 4 rw,r t .. `' t ^ ` i AV iri• > , g,- few ` ,, Jn K w Ivant -.Hill a4 °1 F a. s an 7r+' . ,, 1 rciJect arca lucait, p. y ro = r0 Sv a Ar,, 0. I 4, s 1 ?,,s- `,1 II r Ili. g*y: lam, p• o i. PRUJtiC'l AREA 4: sra 4, y 4 i 5 Mt[k, Av may. i. r < i. Island ofHawaii v - 0 .25. km its, ii,, ‘,t.\ Figure I. Project area location. 2 RC-0342 I;' r41,. .. w ai,t,. - .-.. ..r•r4.,7,11.ti ,i.„, a I • . v#If4• ,- -...-•, .4.1? ' I A .,.„,,..44..tli _ i -411 r• 0 $14" ...L.2j1 ... „...t , '"4.,... s. 7:.r41 f*If 11 * 7? -... --/ • ttli-el,‘I ,ti - . ' ' • 1., 4% ';'"-Z:A•11',...VI 1 4•,4..J s, Ye' 4 °I 4'44 •I . . . c .I Cri, 'I , 7 iHii.in, 4 14. I; 4 it.•4 4 a ..' i"..t,..t Ilk, t 44 4,W.I 1 I r ,, I• i'i 4. 0—-.... t. _________ t te-I 1.; AA a.*,."...°.•'.L.'..'::-'.'-.,' k• T.,•4__.._._. A_.T1.•,. 1 C. rt. T,tV• It.tsA. v... f., iV4r." t.. 1 - I''c lit, •i c i,i,ci i''.,% *. 4,, ,.., .. ,,,,z t,' , ,-; i '0• 1: 4411,3 ....TA. .0 Liorw4...4 1 : ..1.71111..''k Figure 2.TMK:3-2-4-25 showing current study parcels(48,50,52,53,59 por..67 por.,78 por.,80 por.,93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por.,and 126 por.). 3 RC-0342 A working definition of Traditional Cultural Property is as follows: Traditional cultural property"means any historic property associated with the traditional practices and beliefs of an ethnic community or members of that community for more than fifty years. These traditions shall be founded in an ethnic community's history and contribute to maintaining the ethnic community's cultural identity. Traditional associations are those demonstrating a continuity of practice or belief until present or those documented in historical source materials,or both. The origin of the concept of Traditional Cultural Property is found in National Register Bulletin 38 published by the U.S. Department of Interior-National Park Service."Traditional"as it is used, implies a time depth of at least 50 years, and a generalized mode of transmission of information from one generation to the next, either orally or by act. "Cultural" refers to the beliefs, practices, life-ways, and social institutions of a given community. The use of the term "Property" defines this category of resource as an identifiable place. Traditional Cultural Properties are not intangible,they must have some kind of boundary;and are subject to the same kind of evaluation as any other historic resource, with one very important exception. By definition, the significance of Traditional Cultural Properties should be determined by the community that values them. PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION The current project area consists of approximately ten acres(TMKs:3-2-4-25:48,50,52,53,59 por.,67 por.,78 por.,80 por.,93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por.,and 126 por.) located in KOkilau I" Ahupua'a,South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii(see Figures 1 and 2). Elevation within the project area ranges from approximately 90 to 120 feet above sea level. The area is a combination of open grassland, disturbed forestland. and iddevelopedresidentialsenttal land. The mauka portion of the project area follows a narrow drainage created by the State of Hawaii for the Mohouli Housing Project. The drainage crosses several developed residential parcels and Popolo Street,and outlets onto five undeveloped parcels(TMKs:3-2-4-25:48,50.52.53, and 93)that are subject to periodic flooding.These parcels have been altered by bulldozing in most areas,save for strip in the central portion of TMK:3-2-4-25:48 and the northeastern corner of TMK:3-2-4-25:53 where a raised bedrock ridge formation was left intact. The area where the drainage channel lets out is bordered to the east by Kapiolani Street; to the south by an undeveloped residential parcel and two developed residential parcels,to the north by a proposed road right-of—way and an undeveloped residential parcel,and to the west by a driveway(proposed Kupukupu Street)and two developed residential parcels(see Figure 2).The project area is located directly across the street from the Hilo Police Station. Soils in the study area are classified as Keaukaha extremely rocky muck(rKFD),a dark brown and strongly acidic soil that is approximately eight inches thick,and that possesses rapid permeability,moderate runoff,and a slight erosion hazard(Sato et al. 1973).This soil has developed over pdhoeho lava flows that originated from Mauna Loa Volcano approximately 750 to 1.500 years ago(Wolfe and Morris 1996). Vegetation within the project area ranges from thick to fairly open(Figures 3 and 4),and is dominated by secondary growth forest containing a variety of exotic trees including mango(;tfangifera indica).African tulip tree (Spathodea campanulata), Alexandra palm (Archontophaenix alexandrae), banyan (Ficus microcarpa), avocado(Persea americano),ti(Cordylinefruticosa),hala(Pandanus tectorius),rose apple(Sy_ygiumjambos), and Java plum(Syzygium cumini).Ground cover consists primarily of ferns,grasses,and vines such as wedelia Ifedelia trilobata), made pilau(Paederia foetida),and California grass(Brachiaria mutica),thorny wait-a-bit Caesalpina decapetala), and philodendron (Philodendron sp.) (Terry and Yoshida 2006). The existing vegetation pattern indicates that the study area has undergone substantial alteration in the past including but not limited to mechanized clearing and earth moving in the low-lying areas. 4 RC-0342 y ,' 0'' i Yf 1 f" t e. 4 l` yTj 41y 4Y g a, A w a t.,-,,,-,14,1441,,10,'' A ' a ., z- Figure 3.View to east ofvegetation along Kapiolani Street. Ys} tlt 1 f+ 444 Ar IVe -" 4'd .4:: 44 ' if '.1. - - . n' I., y .'..' S - t ' y4* i.,, c . tt<:' rig. d t t.fX, 4 ‘ 4,.. t c Vin, f FA i Pte. ry rye i s r P„i,, , !.'y ` 1 t t i*i1 t ICY t'4 .may . t+".- v. f"' ._' `• .t,. . ' bS t Figure 4.View to east ofvegetation on TMK:3-2-4-25:48 along the drainage channel. 5 RC-0342 BACKGROUND STUDIES This section of the report describes and synthesizes prior archaeological,cultural,and historical studies that are relevant to the current project area; and provides a brief culture-historical background of Kukuau 1" Ahupua'a and the general South Hilo District. Previous Archaeology At the turn of the century,Thrum(1907a, 1907b)and Stokes(Stokes and Dye 1991)documented heiau sites for the Island of Hawaii.Thrum(1907a)lists 16 heiau for Hilo District,none ofwhich were located in Kukuau I" Ahupua'a.Thrum notes: Ofthe heiaus of the district of Hilo little evidence oftheir existence now remains,so complete has been their destruction, but though their stones are scattered, much of their history is yet preserved.(Thrum 1907a:40) One early archaeological study of East Hawaii was conducted by Hudson (1932) for the B. P. BishopMuseum. He noted that, "there was an important village and trading center around Hilo Bay"(1932:20), but related that,"no archaeological remains are to be found within the town of Hilo itself except a few stones which are said to have been taken from heiaus..."(1932:226). More recent archaeological studies conducted to the south of the current project area in Waiakea Ahupua'a Borthwick et al. 1993; Escott 2004; Hunt and McDermott 1993; Maly et a1.1994; Rechtman and Henry 1998; and Spear 1995) have identified, almost exclusively, Historic archaeological remains associated with the Waiakea Sugar Plantation,which operated in Waiakea Ahupua'a between 1879 and 1947(Rechtman and Henry 1998:5).Common features recorded during these studies included stacked rock mounds,enclosures,core-filled walls,and parallel wall alignments used for irrigation and for lining the plantation's railroad tracks. To the north of the current project area, the B. P. Bishop Museum conducted research and an archaeological inventory survey at two locations along the Alenaio Stream for a flood damage reduction study Kelly and Athens 1982). Investigations along the proposed routes of their study area did not identify any archaeological sites. However, two locations were noted as having the potential to contain subsurface cultural deposits,one near a small plantation house,and another adjacent to the Old Hilo Jail. Within the ahupua'a of Kukuau, Hunt and McDermott (1993) conducted an archaeological inventory survey ofthe Pu'ainakO Street extension.Their study area also crossed Waiakea and Ponahawai ahupua'a south and west of the current project area.As a result ofthat survey eleven sites containing ninety-seven features were recorded within the proposed road alignment. All of the recorded sites and features were determined to be Historic in origin and associated with the Waiakea Sugar Plantation.Three volcanic glass flakes recovered from an excavation beneath one of the Historic features also suggested possible Precontact use of the area. Additionally, Scientific Consultant Services (Spear et al. 1996) conducted an archaeological inventory survey of the then proposed Mohouli Connector Road that crossed the ahupua'a of Kukuau I" and 2"J. Ponahawai.and Punahoa.The 100-foot wide corridor extended for approximately 6,600 feet southwest(mauka) of the current project area. The investigation found the land to be as much as three-quarters previously cleared by bulldozer,and no archaeological sites were recorded. Culture-Historical Background This section summarizes the general cultural history of Hilo and more specifically the history of Kukuau I" Ahupua'a. For a more in-depth historical background ofHilo the reader is referred to Kelly et al.(1981),Maly1996),and McEldowney(1979). The earliest historical knowledge ofHilo comes from legends written by Kamakau(1961)of a 16th century chief Umi-a-Liloa(son of Liloa)who at that time ruled the entire island of Hawaii. Descendants of Umi and his sister-wife were referred to as "Kona" chiefs, controlling Kai), Kona, and Kohala, while descendants of Umi and his Maui wife were "Hilo" chiefs, controlling Hamakua, Hilo, and Puna (Kelly et al. 1981:1). According to Kamakau(1961)both sides fought over control of the island,desiring access to resources such as feathers,momaki tapa, and canoes on the Hilo side; and wauke tapa. and warm lands and waters on the Kona side(c.f.Kelly et al. 1981:3). 6 RC-0342 Sometime near the end of the 16th century or early in the 17'''century,the lands of Hilo were divided into ahupua'a that today retain their original names(Kelly et al. 1981:3). These include the ahupua'a of Pu`u'eo, Pi'ihonua, Punahoa, Ponohawai, Kukuau and Waiakea(Figure 5). The design of these land divisions was such that residents could have access to all that they needed to live, with ocean resources at the coast, and agricultural and forest resources in the interior. However, only Pi`ihonua and Waiakea provided access to the full range of resources stretching from the sea up to 6,000 feet along the slopes of Mauna Kea (Kelly et al. 1981:5). bk 1_ 113113$t,'Y Ma'/ 1 P•1•/-7 .,e` r 7 of II 041\1 W4IAKEA f r t Figure 5.Hilo Bay showing ahupua'a(from Kelly et al. 1981:2). Historical accounts(McEldowney 1979)place the current study area in a zone of agricultural productivity. As Isabella Bird recorded upon arriving in Hilo in 1873: Above Hilo, broad lands sweeping up cloudwards,with their sugar cane, kalo,melons,pine- apples,and banana groves suggest the boundless liberality ofNature.(Bird 1964:38) Handy and Handy(1972)also describe the general region as an agricultural area: On the lava strewn plain of Waiakeia and on the slopes between Waiakea and Wailuku River, dry taro was formerly planted wherever there was enough soil. There were forest plantations in Panaewa and in all the lower fern-forest zone above Hilo town along the course of the Wailuku River.(Handy and Handy 1972:539) Maly(1996)refers to a 1922 article from the Hawaiian Language newspaper, Ka Nupepa Ku'oku'a,where planting on pahoehoe lava flats is described. There are pahoehoe lava beds walled in by the ancestors in which sweet potatoes and sugar cane were planted and they are still growing today. Not only one or two but several times forty (mau ka'au)of them. The house sites are still there, not one or two but several times four hundred in the woods of the Panaewa. Our indigenous bananas are growing wild, these were planted by the hands of our ancestors.(Maly 1996:A-2) As part of an archaeological assessment study, Maly(1996)conducted historical research for the lands of Wainaku, Ponohawai, Waiakea, and Piihonua (to the north and south of the ahupua'a of Kukuau). Maly discussed the significance of the use of the Hawaiian word wai in the place names: Ponohawai, Waiakea, Wainaku, and Wailuku (River). According to Maly, the word wai (water) can be likened to the Hawaiian concept of wealth "waiwai,"stressing its cultural importance(Maly 1996:A-2). In this context,the importance of Hilo can be better understood, with its copious streams that fed taro pondflelds and its numerous fishponds Maly 1996) 7 RC-0342 The ahupua'a of Kukuau t"and 2"d likely provided a wide variety of valuable subsistence resources to the Precontact Hawaiians residing there and al 'i who claimed the land.Settlements in this land were focused on the coast with the exception of some residences being established among the inland agricultural fields. The ahupua'a residents utilized the uplands in accordance to specific elevation zones (McEldowney 1979). These land use zones reflected different environments where specific natural resources were readily acquired and where varying degrees of modification of the terrain produced a surplus of dryland and wetland agricultural goods. Thus, the project area lands being part of the Upland Agricultural Zone(above 50 feet elevation)were probably subjected to extensive cultivation during prehistoric times.McEldowney states: The extent of this zone varies in early journals, but most confirm that an expanse of unwooded grasslands or a "plain" behind Hilo town extended up to approximately the 1.500 ft elevation (i.e., the edge of the forest). Scattered huts, emphasized by adjacent garden plots and small groves of economically beneficial tree species, dotted this expanse. The cumulative effects of shifting agricultural practices(i.e.,slash-and-burn or swidden), prevalent among Polynesian and Pacific peoples, probably created and maintained this open grassland mixed with pioneering species and species that tolerate light and regenerate after a fire... With remarkable consistency,early visitors to Hilo Bay describe an open parkland gently sloping to the base of the woods.This open but verdant expanse, broken by widely spaced"cottages"or huts,neatly tended gardens,and small clusters of trees... Estimates as to the extent of this unwooded expanse ranged from between five and six miles(Goodrich1826:4)to between three and four miles(Goan 1882:29)above the coast or village,with most falling between four or five miles. The constituents ofgardens and tree crops in the village basically continued in the upland except that dry-land taro was planted more extensively and bananas were more numerous...This same pattern occurred between Waiakea Pond and the Pana`ewa Forest in the four or five miles of open country dominated by tall grasses. Here stands of kukui Aleurites mouccana), pandanus, and mountain apple became more conspicuous, with large areas of dryland taro planted in rocky crevices on the younger Mauna Loa flows...(McEldowney 1979:18-20). In Precontact Hawaii, all land,ocean and natural resources were held in trust by the high chiefs(ali'i ahupua'a or all`i 'al main). The use of land, fisheries and other resources were given to the hoa'aina(native tenants)at the prerogatives of the ali'i and their representatives or land agents(konohiki),who were considered lesser chiefs. The wealth of resources and population in Hilo, according to Hunt and McDermott (1993), are reflected in the chiefly controls held over the District,especially the ahupua'a of Waiakea.Kamehameha I lived for a time in the Hilo area and built many of his large war canoes at Hilo.The availability of large koa trees in the forests of the Hilo area made it an ideal place to fashion canoes. When Vancouver visited Hilo in 1794, he found Kamehameha I stocking food and making war canoes for his conquest of the Hawaiian Islands. Kamehameha I had substantial land holdings in the Hilo area. At his death Kamehameha I gave his Waiakea land holdings to his son Liholiho. Kukuau I"and 2nd were given to his trusted haole advisors John Young and Isaac Davis(Kelly et al. 1981:11). By 1845, the Hawaiian system of land tenure was being radically altered, and the foundation for implementing the Mahele 'Rina was set in place. As the Mahele evolved, it defined the land interests of Kauikeaouli (King Kamehameha Ill), some 252 high-ranking Alii and Konohiki, and the Government. As a result of the Mahele, all land in the Kingdom of Hawaii came to be placed in one of three categories: (1) Crown Lands(for the occupant of the throne); (2)Government Lands; and(3) Konohiki Lands(cf. Indices of Awards 1929).The"Enabling"or"Kuleana Act"of the Mahele(December 21, 1849)further defined the frame work by which hoa'aina(native tenants)could apply for,and be granted fee-simple interest in"Kuleana"lands cf. Kamakau in Ke Au Okoa July 8 and 15, 1869; 1961). The Kuleana Act also confirmed the rights of hoa aina to access, subsistence, and collection of resources necessary to their life upon the land in their given ahupua'a("Enabling Act",August 6, 1850-HAS DLNR 2-4). According to Maly (1996). before receiving their awards from the Land Commission, the native tenants were required to prove that they lived on the land,or that they cultivated the land for a living. They were not permitted to acquire wastelands or lands that they cultivated"with the seeming intention ofenlarging their lots." 8 RC-0342 Once a claim was confirmed,a survey was required before the Land Commission was authorized to issue any award. While the commoners were required to provide proof of land use and habitation, the land claims of royalty rarely included any land use documentation.For the commoners,this"requirement of proof'produced a series ofvolumes ofregistry and testimony-the"Bake Mahele". During the Mahele of 1848, the sons of John Young and Isaac Davis received large portions of Kukuau ahupaa'a; smaller parcels were awarded to both native Hawaiians, and foreign recipients (see following discussion). One of Davis' sons(G.D. Hueu) received a large portion of Kukuau 2" Ahupua`a(3,450 Acres, LCAw.8521-B)and Young's son(Keoni Ana)received 9,360 acres of Kukuau I u Ahupua'a(LCAw.8515,see discussion below)(Kelly et al. 1981:40). The current study area is a portion of LCAw. 8515 to Keoni Ana, and is located just north of the northern border of LCAw. 2663 to Kahue and LCAw. 2402 to Keaniho(Figure 6). The Mahele records for Kahue and Keaniho provide the following documentation of land use in the vicinity of the current project area during the middle part of the nineteenth century: Kukuau,December 16, 1847 LCA 2663 Kahue[Native Register Volume 8:675] The land measures 50 fathoms by 30 fathoms November 7, 1848 LCA 2446[corrected to 2663]Kahue[Foreign testimony Volume 5:3] Haoleopunui sworn,said he knew the house lot to be situated on the Ahupua'a of Kukuau Pt and bounded on the west by Kanakaholokai's ground,on the North by the Ahupua'a of Kukuau,on the East by Aiko's enclosure,on the south by a piece ofwaste land. There are three houses on it,all belonging to Kahue. He received the plot from Puna in the year 1840,since which time he has held it without dispute LCA 2663.Kahue[Foreign Testimony Volume 5:80] Kamakani sworn says, I am an old resident on Kukuau, Hilo and know the kuleana of Kahue. It is bounded on the Hilo Paliku side by the kuleana of Keaniho,on all the other sides by the Konohiki.He received it from Kaiana in 1844,and Kaiana from Kaunuohua before Nahienaena's death(1836). December 18, 1847 LCA 2402.Keaniho[Native Register Volume 3:483] Greetings to you John li, and all the Land Commissioners: We have heard we should petition by the end of the year,therefore we hereby petition for our house lot. I Keaniho, of Ponahawai, and Kahue, of Kukuau. Here is the diagram of our house lot. This is finished. Also,there is a hala grove at Waiakea,a portion is pahoehoe lava and a portion is a'a lava. The boundaries are unequal:60 by 160 by 110.This is finished.This diagram will be kept until the time when we meet.(Maty 1996:20) November 7, 1848 LCA 2402 Keaniho[Foreign Testimony Volume 5:4] 2402 and 2663 Keaniho and Kahue(Wednesday November 8, 1848) Kaapa sworn, deposed that the land of Keaniho and Kahue was on the Ahupua'a of Ponahawai on the ili of Kanewahineiki, consists of a building lot and planting lot. Is bounded on the west by kalo fields,on the North by the ground of Hawahewa and Kaapa, on the East by strip of waste land, and on the south by a piece of waste land. It is not enclosed and has 3 fields for cultivation, I dwelling house belongs to Keaniho. The land was given to him by Hoolulu and Kaholowaiia in the year 1835.Since which time he has always resided thereon.Kahue not decided,sent for. Lahaina sworn,deposed that the evidence of Kaapa was true. 9 RC-0342 Ctnaeio, f/rixtv6A 0 r/ f.l EI.nJ+.r1i f c.f/ fr It 1 v fl, . t ! d6 fi • r L.-C-A. 1f/S d R f lfean,Ana T 4' J / j Ly f r f f f aj 1(t i r i 11,E Project area / 1PuI'I 3FY 1 Li1`2'451:/1") A\ yo 1 vVaic: c a t urre^+cr II 1111_J I I TOWNS AND V1C1N1TY J.7,..:7,r f"s a and survey by E 0 BaldwinPuueoSectionfromMonserrat' 1 -' i Weirial u Map i C -4 Zsm1 t 1891 rean,/i0 Ys Op s-Ge..., .i,-/'' -1 Scale I Tracedice 3• 1fi.`,/ui'YCy Re .Nlap Ne 1361 E by 4 tR• Ge,nrl Figure 6. Portion of Register Map 1561 showing current study area(from Maly 1996:21). I0 RC-0342 November 8, 1848 LCA 2402 Keaniho[Native Testimony Volume 4:4071 Kaapa sworn and deposed: I know,there in the Ahupua'a of Ponahawai in the land parcel of Kanewahineiki... Moving to the parcel in Waiakea and testimony received- Kahue sworn and deposed;1 know that there in the Ahupua'a of Waiakea are 2 cultivated fields(kihapui)that I gave to Keaniho,3 cultivated fields remain mine,I gave them [two fields]to him in 1840.No one has disputed our claim.(Maly 1996:20,22) These testimonies indicate the use of' lands adjacent to the kuleana parcel's boundaries. Through the testimony of Keaniho it is apparent that kalo (taro) was being cultivated to the west of LCAw. 2402, that wasteland was present to the south and east,and that the grounds of Hawahewa and Kaapa were present to the north(which should be the location of LCAw. 2663).According to Kahue's testimony,wasteland was present to the south of LCAw. 2663 (which should be the location of LCAw. 2402), Kanakaholokai's ground was present to the west,Kukuau Ahupua'a to the north,and Aiko's enclosure was present to the east. Most of the kuleana claims were awarded to native Hawaiians, but a Chinese individual, Y. Aiko(1799- 1895), received a 1.01-acre parcel in Kaki-tau (LCAw. 3205) (Hunt and McDermott 1993). In Kahue's testimony he mentions that his parcel is bounded on the east by Aiko's enclosure. However, no information pertaining to the location of LCAw. 3205 was evident on any of the cartographic resources reviewed for the current study.It is uncertain if Aiko's LCAw.parcel was also the location of the Aiko's enclosure located to the east of LCAw.2663. Interestingly, Aiko is remembered as an early Chinese immigrant to Hawaii who was involved in the first sugar production in the islands (Dorrance and Morgan 2000). Aiko arrived in the islands in mid-1830s from China.Two men were responsible for Aiko's arrival from China: Atai,a Chinese businessman/retail store co- owner in Honolulu, and William French (1765-1861), a prominent local businessman with experience in the sugar industry. The two started a sugar mill in Waimea, Kauai in 1835. The goal of their operation was to make sugar on shares"(splitting the proceeds between the grower and the miller). This was successful, using harvests of native grown cane. French and Atai were emboldened to import four sugar masters, and a second mill from Canton,China(Dorrance and Morgan 2000:15, 16). One ofthe four Chinese sugar masters brought to Hawaii by French and Atai was Aiko. When the mill in Waimea, Kauai shut down,Aiko went to the Island of Hawaii. In 1837, Aiko settled in South Kohala on land that Governor Kuakini(1791-1844)planted in cane. He erected and operated a mill on shares with Kuakini until 1843, when he moved to North Kohala to run Kuakini's plantation located there (Dorrance and Morgan 2000:17). Aiko had supervised both these operations since 1839. During this time, Governor Kuakini, with Chinese help, started another mill in Hilo on Ponahawai Hill. A year later in 1844, Aiko moved there with his family. Then after the Mahele of 1848, he acquired considerable property of his own. In 1849,Aiko went back to the North Kohala plantation,closed it down in 1850,and returned to Hilo. For the next two decades,until 1869,he lived there and devoted his time to helping several other Chinese run the mill and plantation at 'Amauulu Dorrance and Morgan 2000:17). In 1867 a Hilo merchant and investor,Capt.Thomas Spencer(1812-1884)purchased 'Amauulu Plantation from Aiko.The business consisted of a mill and 4,000 acres, 1 mile north of Hilo.Production was reported to be 500 tons of sugar in 1872 and in 1880; this amount was doubled under Aiko's management. But in 1884, this small plantation's lands were added to those of Hilo Sugar Company, and "Amauulu Plantation no longer existed"(Dorrance and Morgan 2000:102-103). According to Maly(1996:26),the period ofdevelopment between 1870s and 1890s saw the rapid change in Hilo town and growth of the sugar industry. Hilo soon grew to become the second largest city in the Hawaiian islands (McEldowney 1979:39). Vast tracts of land were under sugarcane cultivation, which was remarkably labor-intensive, and took advantage of an immigrant labor force. Prior to 1930, breaking of ground to plant sugarcane was done by mules. By 1935 most areas(where possible)were plowed by tractors to a depth of six inches. The fields were not irrigated but rather relied on Hilo's high rainfall. Cane yields varied with rainfall. The fertility was good, but many fields were rocky (Kelly et al. 1981:121). Sugar processing plants in the vicinity of Kukuau 1 Ahupua'a included the Waiakea Mill Company to the east,and Hawaii Mill Company in 11 RC-0342 Pi`ihonua Ahupua'a, to the west. The Waiakea Mill Company, whose land holdings included portions of Kukuau, operated from 1897 through 1946, and was one of the largest sugar companies to operate in Hilo. When the company's 30-year lease of Waiakea lands expired in 1918,the government under homestead laws, subdivided a large tract of land into hundreds of lots granted to homesteaders in 1919(Kelly et al. 1981:121). Commercial sugar production lasted in Kukuau until the mid twentieth century,at which time many of the fields were converted to pasturage associated with cattle ranching. CURRENT PROJECT EXPECTATIONS Based on soil substrate and elevation,the current project area falls within the Upland Agricultural Zone(Zone II) as defined by McEldowney (1979). The archaeological expectations for the zone include Precontact agricultural features and habitation sites.However,based on results ofthe previous archaeological studies in the vicinity (Hunt and McDermott 1993, and Spear et al. 1996) it appears that nineteenth and twentieth century mechanized cultivation may have impacted any earlier features and resulted in an overlay of more recent agriculture-related sites or ancillary habitation sites.Despite the high frequency of land clearing in the Hilo Bay area,the historical trend in prior studies in the area indicates that some features may be extant. FIELDWORK METHODS AND RESULTS On May 23, and June 6 and 7, 2006, Mathew R. Clark, B.A., J. David Nelson, B.A., Mark J. Winbum, B.A., Olivier M.Bautista,B.A.,and Liz Hauani'o performed an intensive pedestrian survey of the project area,under the direction of Robert B. Rechtman, Ph.D. The limits of the area were marked on a map provided by SSFM International, Inc. The field investigators walked east/west transects spaced at 10-meter intervals across the entire main body ofthe project area.The drainage ditch was then explored from its eastern to western end.With the exception of localized dense patches of hapu'u and California grass. ground visibility was adequate for locating all archaeological resources. When archaeological resources were encountered they were plotted on a map ofthe study parcel using a tape and compass,then cleared of vegetation,mapped in detail using a tape and compass, photographed, and described using standardized site record forms. The recorded archaeological features were grouped into sites based on their perceived proximity,functionality,and temporality. Findings As a result of the current inventory survey a single archaeological site(Site 25547)was recorded on TMK:3-2- 4-25:48(Figure 7).Site 25547 is an elongated enclosure located within a raised bedrock crack formation to the north of the excavated drainage channel. Site 25547 that contains three modified sections consisting of stacked cobbles. This site is probably Historic in origin, and its use likely coincided with the use of several Historic features noted on TMKs:3-2-4-25:54 and 132,outside of the current project area,along the same raised bedrock formation as Site 25547. These features included a core-filled wall segment, several modified outcrops, an enclosure,modified lava blisters,and an early 20"'century trash dump.A long time Hilo resident,Kenneth Bell see Consultation section below), indicated that the location of these features corresponded to the location of several wooden shacks that were lived in until the 1940s. Site 25547 is described in detail below and its location,relative to the project area boundaries and the nearby habitation features,is shown in Figure 7. SIHP Site 25547 Site 25547 consists ofa twenty-four-meter long by two-meter wide section of a natural pahaehoe bedrock crack that has been modified in three sections with stacked cobbles (Figure 8). The site is located north of the excavated drainage channel,in the central portion of TMK:3-2-4-25:48(see Figure 7).The modifications to the bedrock crack consist of two sections of stacked cobble wall that cross the crack at the eastern and western ends of the feature(Sections 1 and 3),and a third section that lines the bedrock crack's northern edge in the central portion of the feature (Section 2). These modifications appear designed to restrict access into or out of the bedrock crack. The bedrock ridge/crack formation continues both east and west of the site area. Most of Site 25547 consists ofunmodified vertical bedrock that stands one to two meters tall.Ground surface within the area enclosed by the modifications consists of level soil covered by a thick mat oforganic debris.No cultural debris was observed within or around Site 25547, but based on its proximity to an area of known twentieth century habitation, it is likely that the site is ofsimilar antiquity. Site 25547 may have functioned as enclosure designed to keep small animals(i.e. pigs,dogs,etc.)within or out ofthe enclosed space. Each modified section of Site 25547(Sections 1,2,and 3)is described in detail below. 12 RC-0342 le\ i i i.'' 1 i. i Current project area y i ii t, i Edge of raised i bedrock formation14, i i i —..."\ i 1 TMK parcel i i boundaries 1/244 i 4 i i i 1 l t I. i i 0 20 40 v --- I I I i _.- Scale in meters moiU• j i I C'Aw.2663 1 4.i t i AA 714, 1 ' 1, \ t 1 !.11I 1 t \ a 1` 1` il Mg1 '1 t 1 \ 1 11 f \ Kapiolani Street Area ofhistoric habitation features Police Station Figure 7.Project area plan view. 13 RC ;42 60) 1**, pit (70) Section 3 trite Thick vegetation boulders \ 0 t 2 I I 6i1)Scale in meters 186) 76) ct, Section 2 11 Vertical bedrock galls 06) / zni o 35)/ Section I IS 1(16) a0) ••1 i Steep slope Stacked Figure 8.SIHP Site 25547 plan view. 14 RC-0342 Section 1 Section 1 consists of an L-shaped stacked wall located at the eastern end of the site(see Figure 8). Beginning at its western end,the wall runs northeast along the northern edge ofthe crack for 2.8 meters,then turns southeast and extends 1.4 meters across the crack to a 1.4 meter tall vertical bedrock face along the southern edge of Site 25547. Section I stands up to 1.2 meters tall by 0.7 meters wide (Figure 9), but the segment that crosses the crack is mostly collapsed. standing only 0.4 meters tall along its interior by 0.8 meters tall along its exterior Figure 10). rt. s a t° 1 .' 444\ cfr i' t ,,te -. @'"k'4 0i 3 k,, a' SSSSS A 7: s‘;, %,, KS i ' y. / 1 74‘ TNtik w . Figure 9.SHIP Site 25547 Section I.stacked rock along bedrock edge,view to the north. 1 7 r r 14 it I 1/4 a i ew 7 i vim. e*1A. f it," a ave ' k;, k pa. . Figure 10. SIHP Site 25547 Section I,collapsed rock stack across bedrock formation,view to west. 15 RC-0342 Section 2 Section 2 consists a linear stacked wall located along the northern edge of the crack, approximately half way between Sections I and 3(see Figure 8). Section 2 measures four meters long,stands three to four courses tall, with an interior height of 0.9 meters(Figure 11).an exterior height of0.4 meters(Figure 12),and a width of 0.7 meters. Section 2 appears to have been constructed as a barrier to compensate for a low section of bedrock along the northern edge of the crack.Vertical bedrock is present to the east and west ofSection 2. v , r ,1 1 1 , 4 .1. '.T414',A.-.J.:''''" '4". 16 IX t, ' ',.,,,t.--\- .--:7--„,,i. ",..„‘.. t i +c A.A 4 ,..,4 ' ,-.--- * t' t %;;;ir r # r+,,, . . Figure 11.SIHP Site 25547 Section 2,interior face ofrock stack,view to north. F. , , 3 L t. tom, f It' ' '''''' 5,i:''744'16 s I!" f„...1.0t,,,,,,,- .-7_li. _ . /7-.7.- fid Figure 12.SIHP Site 25547 Section 2,exterior face of rock stack view to southwest. 16 RC-0342 Section 3 Section 3 consists of a stacked wall that crosses the width of the bedrock crack at the western end of Site 25547 see Figure 8). Section 3 is linear, running northwest/southeast, and measuring 3.1 meters long by 0.6 meter wide,by 0.8 meter tall(2 courses)(Figure 13).This section is in poor condition due to collapse caused by dense vegetation,but it was likely designed to restrict access at the western end of the site. s, `441,.4 yap b.,' r---toti' i t -—..'44k. 1' vii '"" t/ N.., q` t" •t. • yam los t4, .,,t,,,,- v l ft rt i4T" tr 1' 9S T 1 may.* ii'. j a p rS. P ill` t41...'""i..Y ' Y ' t!'''.1' if = a A. 4, ,t 0.,,,,,_- 'l'i 4ff''' 4 "ip 04, ; Figure 13.SII II'Site 25547 Section 3;view to south. CONSULTATION As part of the current study an effort was made to obtain information about any potential traditional cultural properties and associated practices that might be present,or have taken place within the project area.The Office of Hawaiian Affairs(East Hawaii)and the Hilo Hawaiian Civic Club were contacted but had no information relative to the existence of traditional cultural properties in the immediate vicinity of the current project area; nor did they provide any information indicating current use of the project area for traditional and customary practices. Mr. Kenneth Bell was also consulted with respect to past land use in and around the current project area. Mr. Bell has participated in many oral historical projects concerning the development of the Hilo area. He was born in 1915 and is of mixed Hawaiian/Caucasian ancestry. Mr. Bell's father, William John Bell, was superintendent of the Railroad,and Carpentry and Blacksmith Shops for the Waiakea Mill Company.The Bell family lived on Kilauea Avenue during the years employed by the Mill. The senior Bell retired in 1940. Kenneth was well acquainted with the former Waiakea Mill and Plantation operation, having spent time with his father riding rails throughout the system of fields. Kenneth Bell eventually went to work for HT&T (a division ofC.Brewer)and retired as Superintendent of the Bulk Sugar Plant in 1980.Presently Mr.Bell lives in Hilo on Makani Circle. When asked in a telephone interview what he knew of the current project area, he explained that there was a scattering of a few "wooden shacks" that served as residences (not associated with the Waiakea Mill Company) in the portion of the project area fronting Kapiolani Street. This is the same location where clusters of historic refuse were observed immediately to the north of the project area. 17 RC-0342 SIGNIFICANCE EVALUATION, TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS, AND ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION The above-described archaeological site is assessed for its significance based on criteria established and promoted by DLNR-SHPD and contained in the Hawai`i Administrative Rules 13§t3-284-6. This significance evaluation should be considered as preliminary until DLNR-SHPD provides concurrence. For resources to be considered significant they must possess integrity of location,design, setting,materials,workmanship,feeling, and association and meet one or more ofthe following criteria: A Be associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns of our history; B Be associated with the lives of persons important in our past; C Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,period,or method of construction; represent the work ofa master;or possess high artistic value; D Have yielded,or is likely to yield,information important for research on prehistory or history; E Have an important traditional cultural value to the native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group ofthe state due to associations with traditional cultural practices once carried out,or still carried out,at the property or due to associations with traditional beliefs,events or oral accounts—these associations being important to the group's history and cultural identity. While it is the practice of the DLNR-SHPD to consider most historic properties significant under Criterion D at a minimum, it is clear that traditional cultural properties by definition would also be significant under Criterion E. A further analytical framework for addressing the preservation and protection of customary and traditional native practices specific to Hawaiian communities resulted from the Ku Pu'akai 0 Ka`aina v Land Use Commission court case. The court decision established a three-part process relative to evaluating such potential impacts: first,to identify whether any valued cultural, historical,or natural resources are present;and identify the extent to which any traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised; second, to identify the extent to which those resources and rights will be affected or impaired; and third, specify any mitigative actions to be taken to reasonably protect native Hawaiian rights if they are found to exist. SIHP Site 25547 is considered significant under Criteria D for the information it has yielded regarding early twentieth century use of the study area. However,as SIHP Site 25547 was recorded in detail and there is virtually no excavation potential, no further work is recommended. This site is not considered a traditional cultural property and there were no specific natural or cultural resources or cultural beliefs and practices identified relative to the land within the current study area. 18 RC-0342 REFERENCES CITED Bird,I. 1964 Six Months in the Sandwich Islands. University of Hawaii Press,Honolulu. Borthwick D.,J.Collins,W.Folk,and H.Hammatt 1993 Archaeological Survey and Testing of Lands Proposed for Research and Technology, Lots at the University of Hawaii at Hilo (TMK:2-4-01:40 and 157). Report on file DLNR-SHPD,Kapolei. Coan,Titus 1882 Life in Hawaii.New York:Anon Randolph&Co. Dorrance,W.,and F.Morgan. 2000 Sugar Islands: The /65-Year Story of Sugar in Hawaii. Mutual Publishing,Honolulu. Escott,G. 2004 An Archaeological Inventory Survey on Approximately 258 Acres of Land for the University of Hawaii-Hilo Mauka Lands Development, Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District,Island of Hawaii,Hawaii(TMK;3-2-4-01:122).Scientific Consultant Services, Inc.Report 361-2.Prepared for PBR Hawaii,Honolulu. Goodrich,J. 1926 Notice of the Volcanic Character of the Island of Hawaii. American Journal ofScience Series 1,No. 11:2-7 Handy,E.S.C.,and E.Handy 1972 Native Planters in Old Hawaii. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233. Bishop Museum Press,Honolulu.(With M.K.Pukui) Hudson,A. 1932 Archaeology ofEast Hawaii, Volume 1.Honolulu: B.P.Bishop Museum. Hunt,T.,and M.McDermott 1993 Archaeological Inventory Survey: Pu'ainako Street Extension Project;Lands of Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2, and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. Prepared for Okahara and Associates,Engineering Consultants,Hilo,Hawaii. Kamakau,S. 1961 Ruling Chiefs ofHawaii.Honolulu:The Kamehameha Schools Press. Kelly,M.,B.Nakamaru,and D.Barrere 1981 Hilo Bay:A Chronological History; Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawai'i. B.P.Bishop Museum Press,Honolulu. Kelly,M.and S.Athens 1982 Archaeological and Historical Studies for the Alenaio Stream Flood Damage Reduction Study, Hilo, Hawaii. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for U.S.Army Engineer District,Pacific Ocean Division. Maly,K.,A.Walker,and P.Rosendahl 1994 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Waiakea Cane Lots, Portion of Parcel 6, Land of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:2-4-57:01). PHRI Report 1370- 122993.Submitted to Roy Takemoto,Hilo. 19 RC-0342 Maly,K. 1996 Appendix In: Archaeological Assessment Study Hilo Judiciary Complex Project, Lands of Wainaku, POnohawai, Pi'ihonua,and Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii TMK: 2-6-15:1.2;2-6-16:2;2-4-49:18,19;2-2-15:33;2-4-1:12).Paul H.Rosendahl,Inc., Hilo. PHRI Report 1721-061496.Prepared for State of Hawaii,Honolulu. McEldowney,H. 1979 Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design:Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo, Hawaii. Manuscript on file, Department of Land and Natural Resources- State Historic Preservation Division. Rechtman,R,and J.Henry 1998 University of Hawaii-Hilo Kfiwili Street Development Archaeological Inventory Survey TMK: 3-2-4-01:5), Waiakea Ahupua`a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc., Report 1877-100998, Hilo, Hawaii. Prepared for Inaba Engineering,Inc.,Hilo,Hawaii. Sato,H.,W.Ikeda,R.Paeth,R.Smythe,and M.Takehiro,Jr. 1973 Soil Survey of the Island of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and University of Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station. Washington,D.C.:Government Printing Office. Spear,R. 1995 Data Recovery Excavations for Sites 50-1-35-19431, 19432, 19433, 19434, Lands of Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii (TMK:2-4-57:01). Scientific Consultant Services,Inc.Honolulu,HI. Spear,R.,J. Robins,and W.Fortini,Jr. 1996 An Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Proposed Mohouli Connector Road. Ahupua'a of Kukuau I and 2, Ponahawai, and Punahoa, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii.Prepared for Y. Hahn,Ph.D. Stokes,J.F.and Dye 1991 Heiau of the Island of Hawaii. A Historical Survey ofNative Hawaiian Temple Sites. 2. Bishop Museum Press,Honolulu. Terry,R.and L.Yoshida 2006 Botanical Survey,Mohouli Drainage Area.TMKs 3-2-4-25:48,49,50,52,53,59,and 80 pors.), Hilo, Island of Hawaii. Prepared for SSFM International Inc. by Geometrician Associates,LLC. Thrum,T. 1907a Tales from the Temples.Hawaiian Almanac andAnnualfor 1908. 1907b Heiau and heiau sites throughout the Hawaiian Islands. Haiwaiian Almanac and Annual for 1908. Wolfe E.,and J.Morris 1996 Geologic Map of the Island of Hawai'i. Geologic Investigations Series Map 1-2524-A. U.S.Department of the Interior,U.S.Geological Survey. 20 v3`aL PRTRR 1.VOUVG 1 rt CAAIAII.30N LLDANf ' 110ARDOf(AND AND FATFJMe ResoAlCRA LDY40% OfH1 4 .-{9!p y Co.wLwONONWATOtSLIOLTICIMANAOL'YTNTOOVF.RNOROfHA y ,;! f'.,. i R08LRT R.MAMMA y iORAN NA MUM017SCIOR•TAI.ri KANO A`!: iY` . ACTINGOEPUTYINSITOR WA- 0¢Ay S.r AQUATICRp0[alCti 147.01j A.x DOATDIOANDOC[.WRIARATION WBUREAU Of(nNKaCE M,r COMMISSION ONWATTSR NTINICL NANNAUSI INT CONRiRVATION ANI.'OAS`•AL!ANIS STATE OF HAWAII CONSOIVATIONAND RLIIAOURGFIOMCIIIINT 9N:INIFANO m IrHa+0 DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES N;uINISwarm.- ICSI KANOntAw[NlAATIRESTAVECtlYi41Y:i1<N! STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION LAND 601 KAMOKILA BOULEVARD,ROOM 355 VATS!AMA KAPOLEI,HAWAII 96707 September 28, 2006 Dr.Robert Rechtman LOG NO: 2006.3257 Rechtman Consulting,LLC DOC NO: 0609JT83 HC 1 Box 4149 Archaeology Keaau,HI 96749 Dear Dr.Rechtman: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review— An Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Acquisition of Drainageway Lands Project KOkUiau 1'`Ahupua`a,South Hilo District,Island of Hawaii TMK:(3)2-4-025: Var. Thank you for submitting the above referenced report by Nelson, Clark & Rechtman (2006) for our review and•comment. The report presents the results of an archaeological inventory survey of TMKs 3-2- 4-025: 048,050, 052, por. 053, por. 067, por. 078, por. 080, 093, por. 106, por. 107, por. 108, por. 109, por, 110, por. 115, and por. 126 for the County of Hawai`i. One historic property was identified. Rechtman Consluting, LLC, assessed site 25547 as significant under criterion D, and recommended no further work on the site. The report is of good quality and meets the requirements of the historic preservation review process. We accept the recommendation for site 25547 and determine that it is significant under criterion D, for its information content.We also agree that the site has been thoroughly documented and that no further work is required.The report is therefore accepted,and the historic preservation review process for these parcels completed. Please contact Dr.Julie Taomia at 808-327-3691 if you have questions or concerns. Aloha, i i„,,Atir4 ; ,,,,y,' me hi -n,Administrator e Historic Preservation Division JT:gvf Exhibit 4b TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS Hilo, Hawaii FINAL DRAFT June 21, 2019 Prepared for: Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 ATA Austin, T.sutsurni & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineers• Surveyors 501 Sumner Street, Suite 521 Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-5031 Telephone: (808)533-3646 Facsimile: (808)526-1267 E-mail: atahnl@atahawaii.com Honolulu•Wailuku• Hilo, Hawaii Exhibit 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS Hilo, Hawaii FINAL DRAFT Prepared for Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Prepared by Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineers • Surveyors Honolulu • Wailuku • Hilo, Hawaii June 21, 2019 ATA AUSTWTSUTSUMI S AS3QCAT£5 E+vCoNFEa$ . 6ilthM rnu5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1-3 1.1 Location 1 1.2 Project Description 1 2. METHODOLOGY 4 2.1 Study Methodology 4 2.2 Intersection Analysis 4 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 5-10 3.1 Roadway System 5 3.2 Sustainable Transportation 5 3.2.1 Complete Streets 5 3.2.2 Pedestrian Accessibility 6 3.2.3 Bicycle Accessibility 6 3.2.4 Public Transit 6 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes 8 3.4 Existing Traffic Conditions Observations and Analysis 8 3.4.1 Existing Intersection Analysis 8 4. BASE YEAR 2021 11-17 4.1 Defacto Growth Rate 11 4.2 Traffic Forecasts for Known Developments 11 4.2.1 Trip Generation 12 4.3 Base Year 2021 Analysis 15 4.3.1 Base Year 2021 Intersection Analysis 15 5. FUTURE YEAR SCENARIOS 18-22 5.1 Background 18 ATAA,JSTIN TSUTSUMI B.ASSOC.:CMS ,NC: C Vt.ctiGMFAR WAVEVOAS TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont'd Page 5.2 Travel Demand Estimations 18 5.2.1 Trip Generation 18 5.2.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment 18 5.3 Future Year 2021 with Project Analysis 19 5.3.1 Future Year 2021 with Project Intersection Analysis 19 6. CONCLUSIONS 23 6.1 Existing Conditions 23 6.2 Base Year 2021 23 6.3 Future Year 2021 with Project 23 7. REFERENCES 24 II ii ATAAUSTIN TSUT$UM'&ASSOGATES NC Civ,.t c crn • A,.UvFCa3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont'd TABLES 3.1 LOS SUMMARY TABLE EXISTING CONDITIONS 10 4.1 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION 13 4.2 LOS SUMMARY TABLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND BASE YEAR 2021 17 5.1 TRIP GENERATION RATES 18 5.2 PROJECT-GENERATED TRIPS 18 5.3 LOS SUMMARY TABLE BASE YEAR 2021 AND FUTURE YEAR 2021 22 FIGURES 1.1 LOCATION MAP 2 1.2 SITE PLAN 3 3.1 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT FACILITIES 7 3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS, LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS 9 4.1 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS 14 4.2 BASE YEAR 2021 LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS 16 5.1 PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC 20 5.2 FUTURE YEAR 2021 LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS 21 III ATAAUSTW,TSUTguMi&ASSOCIATES CMI LNG!cr.n.= • $fwvF.YOAS TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont'd APPENDICES A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA B. LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA C. LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS iv ATAAUSTIN, TSUTSUMI & ASSOCIATES, INC. civti Ems, INE11-+s•s,..invEYocas CONT NUING THE ENGINEERING PRACTICE FDUNGEn AY H A P AUSTIN IN 1904 TERRANCE'S ARASHIRI:? P F ACRIENNE W t H VvORG P E tEE3 AP OEAYNA M R HAY'ASHI P PAL,K AIWA P ERIK S KANE5H!RO!PLS LEER AP MATT K NAKAMOTO F E GARRETTK TOKUCKA PE TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS Hilo, Hawaii 1. INTRODUCTION This report documents the findings of a traffic study conducted by Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc. (ATA) to evaluate potential traffic impacts resulting from the proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments development in Hilo, Hawaii (hereinafter referred to as the"Project"). 1.1 Location The Project will be located on approximately 5 acres of land consisting of the three (3) undeveloped parcels identified as TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 and 080. The site is bordered by Kukuau Street to the north, Kapiolani Street to the east and Hualalai Street to the south and is currently zoned for County RM-1.5 (Multiple-Family Residential District). See Figure 1.1 for the Project location. 1.2 Project Description The Project is proposing a new residential development that will consist of 64 affordable multi- family units with 145 parking stalls. Access to the Project Site will be provided along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street via Kupukupu Street. Completion of the Project is anticipated in 2021. See Figure 1.2 for the Project site plan. REPLY TO: OFFICES IN: 30' SUMNER STREET, SUITE 521 •HONOLULU, HAWAII 96517-5031 HONOLULU. HAWAII PHONE(BOB)533-3646•FAX 180151526-1267 WAILUKU, MAUI, HAWAII EMAIL :alahhN®alohawali.corn HILO. HAWAII KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI AustinTsutsumi, s, ASSOCIATES F N C .APARTMENTS TIAR Engineers & Surveyors NATE_ 44,,r 4THISDRAWINGISFORco' vILLUSTRATIVEPURPOSESONLY, v P I DO NOT USE AOR CONSTRUCTION.a'`' P r QOM sT NOTTO SCALE O 46 i Y a L r i fCOUNTY OF fy P R ," $ x HAWAII OFFICES 7 ir tlt et, z' v tt --r„.------ PROJECT i` k,, kr LOCATION vr PSC f ST JOSEPH 4± KUPUKUPUJ `l j/',//, 4, N\ a O\' 6 cj e\ r !`V\0( 0xIsemFNPv T\ TF V Cf v ' y ' y e.. 7- 2'"A.,.j N ii e rte/ ' w rH J o• ,rr 0 \ NOT TO SCALE 4, \\/ x 3WNIWAMEA J - " 5 q,1N. rh^ . O IP;i LAUPANOEHOE q NON'' KEAHOLE e.'"' _ CWAAKUA . TH J( q..Pt i PROJECT 0 NORM LOCATIONS w.N/ KAILUA SOUTH } LUA \i r ''"1.-`--__MLC 0 5 i V 5 r V 11341 Uy — PUNA A .KOW( xUMUKANiWAp,} ' M RS'"`ASTUDY INTERSECTIONSr A<, iki..... PAHALA- 1 7 } KUKUAU ST &KUPUKUPU ST j y HONUAPO S o s /a ss 0 KAPIOLANI ST &KUKUAU ST7 1 , SCALE INMILES.--ILES I ISLAND OF KONA O KAPIOLANI ST &HUALALAI ST KA LAEPT LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 . 1 LOCATION MAP WJ olomerm 411, Fee zL o CL u, , W r cl I- DDut NQS v) CJL 4 133tf1S ift,,, dvr. Y/ U: 0) g RV A0 D < W y O 2pQatlmy00 y 17,2 0 d O R'F klowlIC 2Z ata- a' ii F- %C Q¢1- U) mfi- a as wal- 14 1 I I I 3T. t7 s. 0. ,0. • '. a r' Z Q t r y aQ t.,r OZ O ctoce is ndmindm+ tu~ tri co W Oc,0 11/ LL t `L g g D 0a.oma z Y Q o=-10 Li_ z._ da ATAAUSTIN T8UTSUM1&ASSCGATEi Ifv(: C$V.L ENG,?gFFf% • Silt+VF+ORS 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Methodology This study will address the following: Assess existing traffic operating conditions at key intersections during the weekday morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hours of traffic within the study area. Traffic projections for Base Year 2021 (without the Project) including traffic generated by other known developments in the vicinity of the Project in addition to an ambient growth rate. These other known developments are projects that are currently under construction or known new/future developments that are anticipated to affect traffic demand and operations within the study area. Trip generation and traffic assignment characteristics for the proposed Project. Traffic projections for Future Year 2021 (with the Project), which includes Base Year traffic volumes in addition to traffic volumes generated by the Project. Recommendations for Base Year as well as Future Year roadway improvements or other mitigative measures, as appropriate, to reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts resulting from traffic generated by known developments in the region or the Project. 2.2 Intersection Analysis Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure used to describe the conditions of traffic flow at intersections, with values ranging from free-flow conditions at LOS A to congested conditions at LOS F. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition, dated 2016, includes methods for calculating volume to capacity ratios, delays, and corresponding Levels of Service that were utilized in this study. LOS definitions for signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Appendix B. Analyses for the study intersections were performed using the traffic analysis software Synchro, which is able to prepare reports based on the methodologies described in the HCM. These reports contain control delay results as based on intersection lane geometry, signal timing, and hourly traffic volumes. Based on the vehicular delay at each intersection, a LOS is assigned to each approach and intersection movement as a qualitative measure of performance. These results, as confirmed or refined by field observations, constitute the technical analysis that will form the basis of the recommendations outlined in this report. 4 ATA AUSthM.T9UTSUMI 6. CNFER9 • Rt ICIVF,^'n 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Roadway System The following are brief descriptions of the existing roadways in the vicinity of the Project. Kapiolani Street — is generally a north-south, two-way, two-lane, undivided County roadway in the vicinity of the Project. The roadway begins to the north at its T-intersection with Waianuenue Avenue and travels south before terminating at its intersection with Kawili Street and Warrior Avenue at Waiakea High School. Kapiolani Street provides access to residential and commercial areas as well as institutional uses, such as the Hawaii Police Department, Hilo Driver Licensing Station and the University of Hawaii at Hilo. In the vicinity of the Project, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour(mph). Kukuau Street — is generally an east-west, two-way, two-lane, undivided County roadway in the vicinity of the Project. The roadway begins to the east at its intersection with Kilauea Avenue and travels to the west before terminating as a dead end just before Puainako Street. After Puainako Street, Kukuau Street continues a short distance through the existing Hilo Hillside development. Kukuau Street mainly provides access to residential and commercial areas in South Hilo. In the vicinity of the Project, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Hualalai Street — is generally an east-west, two-way, two-lane, undivided County roadway in the vicinity of the Project. The roadway begins to the east at its intersection with Kilauea Avenue and travels to the west before terminating at its intersection with Hale Nani Street, just west of Kapiolani Street. Hualalai Street provides access to St. Joseph School and residential and commercial areas. On-street parking is provided along the roadway east of Kapiloani Street. There is no posted speed limit along the roadway. However, there is a posted reverse turn warning sign with an advisory speed of 10 mph west of Kapiolani Street as Hualalai Street transitions into Hale Nani Street. Kupukupu Street — is general a north-south, two-way, two-lane, undivided Private roadway in the vicinity of the Project. The roadway provides access from Kukuau Street to five (5) existing residential buildings. Kupukupu Street is proposed as one of the accesses to the Project. There is no posted speed limit along the roadway. 3.2 Sustainable Transportation 3.2.1 Complete Streets While transportation planning has traditionally focused on automobile travel, recent "Complete Streets" policies also recognize the numerous benefits of encouraging the use of alternative modes of transportation. `Complete Streets" policies encourage the provision of equitable. accessible and safe transportation for all modes. Hawaii State Senate Bill 718 (2009) required that the Hawaii Department of Transportation HDOT) and the County transportation departments: adopt a complete streets policy that seeks to reasonably accommodate convenient access and mobility for all users of the public highways within their respective jurisdictions..." 5 ATA AUSTIN TSuTSLIM 6 A4SCCMiES A f1 C'VL RR • Si#1VF vORS 3.2.2 Pedestrian Accessibility Sidewalks are provided along the following studied roadways in the vicinity of the Project: Kapiolani Street- Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway. Kukuau Street - A sidewalk is provided along the eastbound direction of the roadway to the west of Kapiolani Street. Hualalai Street- Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway to the east ofKapiolaniStreet. The locations of existing pedestrian facilities are shown in Figure 3.1. 3.2.3 Bicycle Accessibility In the immediate vicinity of the Project, there are currently no bicycle facilities provided along the studied roadway. However, the Bike Plan Hawaii Master Plan, published in 2003 by HDOT, identifies bicycle facilities that are proposed for future implementation. Proposed facilities are assigned a Priority Level ranging from I to III, with Priority Level I planned for near-term completion and Priority Level III planned for long-term completion. An additional Priority Level IV is assigned for bicycle facilities that are contingent on roadway development. In the vicinity of the Project, the following bicycle facilities are identified along studied roadways in the master plan. Signed Shared Roadway- Kapiolani Street (Priority Level II) Bicycle Lane- Kukuau Street (Priority Level II) The proposed bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the Project are shown in Figure 3.1. 3.2.4 Public Transit The County of Hawaii Mass Transit Agency (MTA) operates the Hele-On Bus, which serves the most populated areas of the island. Several routes provide service within Hilo and to/from other regions of the island, with service generally along Kilauea Avenue in the vicinity of the Project. The following routes provide service along Kilauea Avenue: Intra-Hilo Waiakea-Uka Intra-Hilo Keaukaha Intra-Hilo Kaumana Hilo-Volcano-Kau Hilo-Pahoa-Pohoiki Hilo-Honokaa Hilo-Kailua Kona The Intra-Hilo Waiakea-Uka and the Intra-Hilo Kaumana routes also provide service in the immediate Project vicinity along Kapiolani Street and Hualalai Street. The existing Hele-On Bus routes are shown in Figure 3.1. 6 KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI III AustinTsutsumi R ASSOCIATES I N C . APARTMENTS TIAR Engineers & Surveyors NOTES: 1 THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE " k- I N PURPOSES ONLY DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. 17- - NOT TO SCALE 2 PEDESTRIAN.BICYCLE AND TRANSIT FACILITIES SHOWN ON STUDIED ROADWAYS ONLY, Y,et i 0< aek vPti r BJP C4/O4 NY Gl 1..„•,.. r) /\ cr) 4F COUNTY OF ii/ HAWAII OFFICES t o PROJECT p LOCATION y2 r Jif SCHOO. f J KUPUKUPU c`` ST i\ 0 /.,/ 44 :'.',',i 4 S P ,- , p . P LEGEND EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING MARKED CROSSWALK PROPOSED BICYCLE LANE PROPOSED SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY p pk G - EXISTING INTA-HILO WAIAKEA UKA AND J KAUMANA BUS ROUTES FIGURE 3. 1 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT FACILITIES ATA AUSTIN.TSUTSUM!S.ASSOCIATES_tnC h(^ 4v+.ENG....F6AS • 9niav6'O S 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes The hourly turning movement data utilized in this report were collected on May 14, 2019. Based on the proximity to the proposed Project site, the following intersections were studied in the existing conditions scenario. 1] Kukuau Streeb'Kupukupu Street(unsignalized) 2] Kapiolani StreetlKukuau Street (unsignalized) 3] Kapiolani Street/Hualalai Street (unsignalized) Based on the count data, it was determined that the AM peak hour of traffic occurs between 7:00 AM and 8:00 AM and the PM peak hour of traffic occurs between 3:45 PM and 4:45 PM. The turning movement count data is included in Appendix A. 3.4 Existing Traffic Conditions Observations and Analysis The observations and analysis described below are based on prevailing observations during the time at which the data was collected. Hereinafter, observations that are expressed as ongoing and current shall represent the conditions that prevailed at the time at which the data was collected. 3.4.1 Existing intersection Analysis Traffic volumes in the study area were generally light with the studied roadways primarily serving local traffic. All intersections were observed to operate adequately with no major delays to any movements. The study intersections operate satisfactorily during both peak hours of traffic with all movements operating at LOS C or better. Figure 3.2 illustrates the existing lane configurations, volumes and LOS for the study intersection movements. Table 3.1 summarizes the existing LOS at the study intersections. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C 8 KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI ATA AustinTsutsumi ASSOCIATES INC APARTMENTS TIAR Engineers & Surveyors I NOTE: THIS DRAW GIS FOR 0 G\ co.' tei ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. C DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. YS 4 JJP NOT TO SCALE DATE OF COUNTS.7 4 MAY 14.2019 AMPEAK HOUR. TAO AM-800AM 1NrJ t PMPEAK HOUR. J`13:01y \.. t4i 3:45 PM-4:45PM is 21 0) f 7 co JiJ 0-c) 4 P\ P rye\ Nk O\r to`- o J C/4_64, s) I" G\ G h\ 00• ,h\ s. S a P rna --\‘ JP 0_, `. LEGEND PS' i 5%'-I ,J opootr) - AM(PM)VEHICLE VOLUMES G4.-. .7 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X 1" • XIX) - AM(PM)LOS c3N,A FIGURE 3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS. LANE CONFIGURATIONS. TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS ATA Au$TIN_T$uT$um,G.ASSOf_;ATES .n.t C.V.L ENGINECMS • *S511.•VE FORS TABLE 3.1: LOS SUMMARY TABLE EXISTING CONDITIONS Existing 2019 Conditions AM PM HCM vlc HCM vtc Intersection Delay Ratio LOS Delay Ratio LOS 1: Kupukupu Street& Kukuau Street NB LT'RT 9.2 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A WB LT/TH 0.0 0.00 A 0.0 0.00 A OVERALL 0.0 0.0 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street NB LTiTH/RT 7.9 0.03 A 8.1 0.08 A EB LTITH/RT 15.6 0.37 C 17.0 0.30 C WB LT/THIRT 15.5 0.05 C 14.7 0.04 B SB LT/THAT 7.9 0.00 A 7.7 0.00 A OVERALL 4.3 4.3 3: Kapiolani Street &Hualalai Street NB LTITHtRT 7.7 0.01 A 7.8 0.00 A EB LT/TH/RT 16.8 0.11 C 15.0 0.08 C WB LT/TH/RT 16.1 0.24 C 19.7 0.48 C SB LT/TH/RT 8.5 0.08 A 7.9 0.05 A OVERALL 3.4 6.4 ATA AUST,N TSUT%L ,6 GSSCOATES ",r G dti CNG'NCCAs c,K..4vOAS 4. BASE YEAR 2021 The year 2021 was studied to reflect the build-out year of the Project. Inclusion of other approved or proposed developments is discussed in the following sections. 4.1 Defacto Growth Rate The Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) Travel Demand Forecasting Model (TDFM) provides traffic projections across the island of Hawaii up to year 2035. The forecasting model uses population forecasts from the Hawaii County General Plan to distribute households and vehicular trips across predetermined Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) based upon existing TAZ household distributions. Based on projections in the TDFM, annual growth rates of 1.4%, 1.3%, and 1.1% were applied along Kuakini Street, Kukuau Street and Hualalai Street, respectively, to determine Base Year 2021 conditions. Because the TDFM does not take into account actual planned or proposed developments, traffic forecasts for known developments in the South Hilo region were added to projections as described in Section 4.2 below. 4.2 Traffic Forecasts for Known Developments Traffic projections from all known background projects in the vicinity of the Project at the time of this study were added to the existing roadway network to account for additional growth in the study area. Trips from the following known developments were added to the existing traffic data to reflect Base Year 2021 conditions. The completion dates for each of the background developments were based on the best available information at the time this report. Where build- out information was not available, completion dates were estimated based on anticipated approval and construction schedules. 1. Abundant Life Grocery - This project is located at the northwest corner of the Kinoole Street/Mamo Street intersection. The project proposes to construct an approximately 7,500 square-foot supermarket. At the time of data collection, construction appeared ready to commence, and completion of the project is anticipated to occur by 2021. 2. Panda Express -- This project is located at the southwest corner of the Kilauea AvenuelKukuau Street intersection. The project proposes to construct an approximately 1,860 square-foot restaurant with a drive-thru. At the time of data collection, construction appeared ready to commence, and completion of the project is anticipated to occur by 2021. 3. Ponahawai Medical Office Building - This project is located along Ponahawai Street just east of Komohana Street. The project proposes to construct an approximately 7,000 square-foot office building and is anticipated to be completed by 2021. 4. Hawaii Vision Specialists - This project is located at the northwest corner of the Kapiolani Street/Hualalai Street intersection. The project proposes to construct an approximately 16,000 square-foot ophthalmology/optometry office. At the time of data collection, the project was under construction, and completion of the project is anticipated to occur by 2021. 11 ATA Aj5?1N TSUTSUMI&ASSCGATES C`AL fNGFfn<. MitIRVE.7011 5. Lanakila Housing Redevelopment This project is located at the northeast corner of the Kapiolani Street/Mohouli Street intersection. The project proposes to construct 16 affordable multi-family units, with construction projected to be completed by the end of Fall 2020. An additional 46 units are ultimately planned for the housing redevelopment but funding for the remainder of the project is currently pending. Occupation of the first 16 units is assumed by 2021. 6. Hale Kupuna Housing - This project is located at the northwest corner of the Kinoole Street/Kamana Street intersection. The project proposes to construct 36 affordable multi-family units. Based on the most recent projected completion year of 2020, the project was assumed to be completed and occupied by 2021. 7. Bank of Hawaii - This project is located at the northeast corner of the Kinoole Street/Lanikaula Street intersection. The project proposes to construct an approximately 7,500 square-foot bank and is anticipated to be completed by 2021. 8. Mohouli Senior Housing Phase 3 -- This project is located at the northwest corner of the Mohouli StreetlKomohana Street intersection. The project proposes to develop 92 affordable senior housing units. Construction is projected to be completed by the end of Fall 2020 and assumed to be fully occupied by 2021. 9. Hawaii Island Veterans Housing - This project is located at the northeast corner of the Kapiolani Street/Kawili Street Intersection. The project proposes to construct 92 affordable multi-family rental units for veterans along with a community center and Veteran Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC). The housing component is expected to be completed first, with earliest build-out assumed to occur by 2021. 10, Hilo Hillside - This project is located along the Puainako Street Extension, east of Puainako Heights. Phase 1 of the development includes 56 single-family homes, the majority of which were constructed and occupied at the time of data collection. Phase 2 proposes to construct an additional 66 single-family homes south of Phase 1. Completion of Phase 2 is anticipated to occur by 2021. 11. Puainako Heights -- This project is located along the Puainako Street Extension, east of Wilder Road. The project proposes to construct 49 single family homes under Phase 1A and 1B. The remaining phases of the project do not currently have a timeframe for completion. Preconstruction of Phase 1A and 1B had begun at the time of data collection, and completion is anticipated to occur by 2021 at the earliest. 4.2.1 Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publishes a book based on empirical data compiled from a body of more than 4,250 trip generation studies submitted by public agencies, developers, consulting firms and associations. This publication, titled Trip Generation, 10'h Edition, provides trip rates and/or formulae based on graphs that correlate vehicular trips with independent variables. The independent variables can range from Dwelling Units (DU) for single-family detached homes to Gross Floor Area (GFA) for commercial or office development. Trips for the above background projects were manually generated using trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation, 101' Edition as described above. See Table 4.1 for applied trip generation volumes per project. Note that not all volumes generated by the background projects are anticipated to pass through the study area. Figure 4.1 shows the locations of the background developments. 12 ATA AUSTIN T$UT4UMI 6 ASaGGATE9_Ni. cWl fhGNf'EA9 3tWVEvpA3 Table 4.1: Background Development Trip Generation AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Background Development I Enter Exit Total Enter . Exit Total Abundant Life Grocery 17 12 29 58 55 113 7,500 SF) Panda Express 3 1 4 15 12 27 1,860 SF) Ponahawai Medical Office Building 16 5 21 7 19 26 7,000 SF) Hawaii Vision Specialists 34 10 44 16 41 57 16,000 SF) Lanakila Housing Redevelopment 2 7 9 8 4 12 16 DU) Hale Kupuna Housing 4 15 19 15 9 24 36 DU) Bank of Hawaii 42 30 72 77 77 154 7,500 SF) Mohouli Senior Housing Phase 3 7 12 19 14 11 25 92 DU) Hawaii Island Veterans Housing 10 35 45 35 20 55 92 DU) Hilo Hillside Phase 2 11 34 45 37 22 59 56 DU) Puainako Heights Phase 1 10 30 40 33 19 52 49 DU) Total 156 191 347 315 289 604 Notes 1 All background development trips are not anticipated to pass through the study area 2 DU=Dwelling Unit 3 SF=Square Feet 13 KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI T AustinTsutsumi x A S S O C I A T E S . I N G -APARTMENTS TIAR Engineers & Surveyors NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. 111 itDONOTUSEFORCONSTRUCTION. NOT TO SCALE LEGEND x PROJECT 4 f/!, PROJECT AREA LOCATION iii1LORo PONAHAWAI MEDICAL CLINIC HAWAII VISION SPECIALISTS 1/D 45,4, IANAKILA HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT ItflfI* tt. 1 0 HALE KUPUNA LOW INCOME HOUSING O aBANK OF HAWAII 0irOMOHOULIHEIGHTSSENIORHOUSINGPH3 Y 1111111, HAWAII ISLAND VETERANS HOUSING 1 O HILO HILLSIDE PH2 11 PUAINAKO HEIGHTS PH1 i 8 III 11 11.411 t 11 FIGURE 4. 1 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS ATA AJS-,M TSUTSUm.&A33COATES CNC NfERR • RsiilvF V',}RR 4.3 Base Year 2021 Analysis It is anticipated that by Base Year 2021 without the Project, traffic will have increased over existing conditions due to the development in the South Hilo region. Actual growth within the study region may vary based upon the approval process of the various background projects. Despite growth in the region, the majority of study intersections are expected to operate similar to existing conditions. 4.3.1 Base Year 2021 Intersection Analysis The majority of movements at the study intersections are anticipated to continue operating similar to existing conditions by Base Year 2021. Although some of the minor street movements are expected to experience longer delays, all minor street movements are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. All major street movements are anticipated to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours. Figure 4.2 illustrates the Base Year 2021 forecast traffic volumes and LOS for the study intersection movements. Table 4.2 summarizes the Base Year 2021 LOS at the study intersections compared to existing conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C. 15 KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI ATA AustinTsutsumi ASSOCIATES , t NCAPARTMENTSTZAREngineers8, Surveyors NOTE: THS DRAWING IS FOR O\C', G3 IfILLUSTRATIVEPURPOSESONLY. O! 0- Nr'- X..).a s. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION r `)\Q, NOTTO SCALE 1-::\ ta J N...--'1 00 Al P 9 cam. A-J P, P O., j 7-o O1 orQJ N G,oGrG.o G iso 7 co 4)i, -----\\ N- LEGEND AS l JJsPr Ys\N 1"1. 5— OF - AM(PM)VEHICLE VOLUMES G Q0 - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X O MX) - AM(PM)LOS fy2 dlA FIGURE 4 .2 BASE YEAR 2021 LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS C! QQ , QUUQ ' QUUQ ' 0 E2L a 0 0 , CO NV O O , O r OD CO 0 0 O OOO 0000 t- O 2 m O 0 0 N CD"aa a> °1 O1 n!0 Cr) Cd 0 0 0 0 CO N e-. tl) N N OO h- lEa1 to 0 Q Q ' Q 00< ' QU0< ' V3 J m O Q y . o o , 0 v00 , i `rt 0 ,0 0 0 000 0000 e m 0) 0C4 o Cr). C?CD cors:t'?r` rn N S Q0 00 O m 06 r- aD C) J• W 0Q } p QQ ' < 0CD < ' < 00< ' I- W Y Q oQCOw@ 88 , o cmioo , 00 CO 0 , g p c a ' c2 0 0 o 600 0000 2 Z N U)c g ra O OO r 0f• r-cn 0C?~ CS)NT Z V Q O O O 00 r• K r- rCl/-. o 0 0 H j Z on 0 Q Q. Q UUQ , QUUQ ' w 0cJ (3 H m C)Xc Q O O C} f` to O . - V' COQZ (r) L N O 01 0 C')0 0 , O ' N 0 I- CC CD O` 0 000 0000 If X rW14 CV OO 0) toul rnea r-m '' 43 'T I. v m o1c5 r` ,- r v r- ,- coc 1 2 rntii 6) Y 7 it 2 - z J Y CC Cr Cc 2 ccrYCrcc jaxofCrHvQQ0Q L m m co.> al J J J> V J -J J J> n CNzUNzw ccoO45zw mU 32 j , 0ui O 4 Y Y Y 1 N M t ATAAUSTIN TSUTSUMI S.AS:.CCIAT ES m.I; Cevrt.VG,P•Sri5 • s,..0irnNg 5. FUTURE YEAR 2021 5.1 Background The Project proposes a new residential development that will consist of 64 affordable multi- family units with 145 parking stalls located on an approximately 5-acre site. The Project site is bordered by Kukuau Street to the north, Kapiolani Street to the east and Hualalai Street to the south. Access to the Project Site will be provided along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street via Kupukupu Street. Completion of the Project is anticipated in 2021. 5.2 Travel Demand Estimations 5.2.1 Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publishes a book based on empirical data compiled from a body of more than 4,250 trip generation studies submitted by public agencies, developers, consulting firms, and associations. This publication, titled Trip Generation Manuals 10th Edition, provides trip rates and/or formulae based on graphs that correlate vehicular trips with independent variables. The independent variables can range from Dwelling Units (DU) for single-family detached homes to Square Feet Gross Floor Area (SF GFA) for commercial or office development. These trip rates/formulae and their associated directional distributions were used to estimate the increase in the number of vehicular trips generated by the proposed Project. See Tables 5.1 and 5.2 for Trip Generation formulae and projections for the Project. 5.2.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment Trips generated by the Project were assigned throughout the study area generally based upon existing travel patterns and the Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) Travel Demand Forecasting Model (TDFM). The traffic generated by the Project was added to the forecast Base Year traffic volumes to constitute the traffic volumes for Future Year conditions with the Project. Table 5.1: Trip Generation Rates AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Independent Trip TripVariable Rate Enter Rate Enter Low-Rise Multifamily Housing (220) DU a]23%b]63% 1 a] Ln(T)=0.95Ln(X)-0.51 b] Ln(T)=0.89Ln(X)-0.02 Table 5.2: Project-Generated Trips AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Independent Variable Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total vph) (vph) (vph) (vph) (vph) (vph) Low-Rise Multifamily 64 DU 7 25 32 25 15 40Housing (220) 18 ATAAUSTIN,TS(.,TSUM1 6 ASSOCIATES,INC 5.3 Future Year 2021 with Project Analysis By Future Year 2021, the Project is projected to generate a total of 32(40) net external trips during the AM(PM) peak hours of traffic. The projected growth in traffic is expected along major roadways in the study area. Figure 5.1 illustrates the Future Year 2021 Project-generated trip distribution. 5.3.1 Future Year 2021 with Project Intersection Analysis It is anticipated that by Future Year 2021 with the Project, traffic will increase slightly compared to Base Year 2021 conditions without the Project due to the projected growth along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street. Despite the added traffic, all movements will continue to operate similar to Base Year 2021 conditions at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. Both Project access intersections are anticipated to operate with all movements at LOS B or better during both peak hours. Based on State and County of Hawaii standards, LOS D or better is considered acceptable. Therefore, all study intersections are anticipated to operate within acceptable limits and no roadway improvements are recommended. Figure 5.2 illustrates the Future Year 2021 with Project forecast traffic volumes and LOS for the study intersection movements. Table 5.3 summarizes the Future Year 2021 with Project LOS at the study intersections compared to Base Year 2021 without Project. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C. 19 KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI ATAAustinTsutsuFt, i ASSOCIATES I APARTMENTS TIAR Engineers & Surveyors9Y NOTE: i---7-. THIS DRAWING IS FOR e3 N ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. J DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION OQ,1 JQ jQO\ NOT TO SCALE r° C 1 oti, QJ r O Cis. • a L JL r 0 '..sk/J e\''' rsi ti 1 i •..- re G' P G,G 61st iI - jJ r '.. t Q 6101 'o GOF 4,0' re,0 1 9.CyBGZ G Q Q, V r P O Ns o,o LEGEND A\S 0..).rg zoom, • AMIPM)VEHICLE VOLUMES 0/~ X 1 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X p FIGURE 5. 1 PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC KAIAULU 0 KAPIOLANI ATA AustinTsutsumi APARTMENTS TIAR Engineers & Surveyors NOTE:111THISDRAWINGISFORGAGJc• ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. 9. 1 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. qy .yho`01 J NOT TO SCALE 9 (! IN,: Z ' P rn%N J , R wd,0, \ o`''p,z0.c:31Jfll V"- j tii J 5 o 9. P h irhsm ti f 01 s o/s P`P 15 '' sJ J O\5 1 1 rJ JAG 0 s sZ"S9 x QQ,O P l polo p JO t sol J P 0 ti Q` t .,g lgl s J J o GAG G cP Alf 0G A s>, Goy CO ro0 j JP 9r;s 0 :-AC y ft 0t LEGEND 0. •yp), ',. $ 45.9-6,l toil} • AM(PM)VEHICLE VOLUMES N A G, J X ' p 0 - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X O X(X( - AM(PM)LOS 2 c11A FIGURE 5.2 FUTURE YEAR 2021 LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS co O dd . < 00 < F <00< . dm dd • J 0 - 0 O) f)h-0 ON NW co O O a. > O O O t00 . 0' (O 0 . 00 . 0 0 , O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 Z.;NG 4 OD UO Q M °°ul 06•7 0"/ '-O N O V' O 0 0N iii 2 p Oi t-O O6 6 f Ui 6°O O 6 OO OO '-O O O O N N I) 3 O d d . < 00< dUUd F dm . d d 3 J u. QN O Q 6)Of lA N O) OU ,@ O O , O st00 , O—MO . 00 . O O • Q O O 0000 0000 OO O O z Co N. N-N. O 0 N 0(C) O6 '- °°N.O) T 7 Tt N O O Q O n O 06 N 6 O60t:C C) 00 M CU O6 N.(O W N O d d , 0 0 0 d , <0 0< I-- >- w Q j 9 m 0 0 , CO t00 . 0(D0 . 2F-a a ( 00 ci000 0000 2 °LL u) C)O 2 N O O O N O C4 CO Cl cn NOO'/ O 1 Q 0 0 0 OO N n to N r CA OO N J N iD e) y InCsiv, O d d ' dUUd , <00d xiW Cr CO J Q WCO 4 W Q , m O O , 'Cr Tr00 , O.- M0 . K O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q m fi M OCA O DOOM OD r` Mt.0) O 0 O OO 0 6 U}P CO 2 o .- N. ra l9 f4 Eu.. y W 4) 1 O r spa fa 0 D ta r 11 Y 7 I, o n t c Y 3 !- -- 1" F-- = 1- F- F" 1- O` O V'5 cc cej., a - r .. z t=:- 17-- cZ .. 17 t- C t=-tr °• ~-' _P-W I-uj C w N. 4, m m> ` J tl J -.I J W Y! J ~J -J J W Q! m m W fl) CO m WwZrm mCOm0 m6] mm0 w Z W`/ «) 0 E. ' u) Z W u) u) Z W ?j (n CO O 3 p 7 01co co 07 3r7CCC F`U 3 O O O j i itl Y Y Y Y Y isi ri v rii I-t ATAAUSTIN.TSUTSUM 6 ASSSOC ATES.INC C")L E*:(LNEERS • 4*0+vt,OQg 6. CONCLUSIONS The Project proposes a new residential development that will consist of 64 affordable multi- family units with 145 parking stalls located on an approximately 5-acre site. The Project site is bordered by Kukuau Street to the north, Kapiolani Street to the east and Hualalai Street to the south. Access to the Project Site will be provided along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street via Kupukupu Street. Completion of the Project is anticipated in 2021. At full buildout, the Project is projected to generate a total of 32(40) net external trips during the AM(PM) peak hours of traffic. 6.1 Existing Conditions Traffic volumes in the study area were generally light with the studied roadways serving local traffic only. All intersections were observed to operate adequately with no major delays to any movements. The study intersections operate satisfactorily during both peak hours of traffic with all movements operating at LOS C or better. 6.2 Base Year 2021 Traffic projections in the study area were based upon known developments in the region along with an ambient growth rate applied to nearby roadways. The majority of movements at the study intersections are anticipated to continue operating similar to existing conditions by Base Year 2021. Although some of the minor street movements are expected to experience longer delays, all minor street movements are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. All major street movements are anticipated to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours. 6.3 Future Year 2021 with Project At full buildout, the Project is projected to generate a total of 32(40) net external trips during the AM(PM) peak hours of traffic. Traffic from the Project is expected to generate growth along major roadways in the study area. It is anticipated that by Future Year 2021 with the Project, traffic will increase slightly compared to Base Year 2021 conditions without the Project due to the projected growth along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street. Despite the added traffic, all movements will continue to operate similar to Base Year 2021 conditions at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. Both Project access intersections are anticipated to operate with all movements at LOS B or better during both peak hours. Based on State and County of Hawaii standards, LOS D or better is considered acceptable. Therefore, all study intersections are anticipated to operate within acceptable limits and no roadway improvements are recommended. 23 ATAA AUSTIN TSVTSUMa_S ASSOOAT_ES_FN8 CVit..46Nfffis • ±1,K.vf rOng 7. REFERENCES 1. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 10'r Edition, 2017. 2. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 6'" Edition, 2016. r-12019419.524 UMC Ka.....-1.131fig5ftepat1913812 Ksisu,u C KauRt*otAp% ORAET 11AHda:. 24 ATA AUSTIN.T5USUM &ASSOOATES.,tve C,v6 6640.641,6691 • 6, ."6K4 1.1.11111111111. 16,. APPENDICES ATA AUSTIN rSuTSunni A3SOC.ATES,rNC Civil ENG•NFFNS • SARrvFY00% APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kukuau St-Kupukupu St Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TEAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Group Printed-Motorcycles-Cars&Light Goods-Buses-Unit Trucks_Articulated Trucks_Bicycles on Road-Bicycles on Cro;swaik_-PedestriansIKUKUAUSTKUPUKUPKUTIKUKUAUST From North From t F South I From West Start Time 1 Right I Thru Left' Peds I Right Thru I left I—Pads Right Ttuu i Le I Peds I Righty Thru I Lefti Peds Int Total 07:00 AMI 0 0 0 0 1 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 1... 0 22 0 0 3407:15 AM I 0 0 0 0 I 0 15 0 0 0 0 3 0 34 0 0 52 07:30 AM I 0 0 0 0:. 0 15 0 0 1 0 3 0 59 0 0 7807:45 AMI 0 0 0 0 I 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 . 6oTotal, 0 0 0 0 1 0 64 0 0 1 0 7 0 152 0 0 i 224 Grand Total I 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 1 0 7 0 152 0 0 224 Apprch% 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 12.5 0 87.5 0 100 0 0 Total% 0 __-- 0 0 0 0 28.6 0 0 0.4 0 3.1 __--__0 67.9 0 0 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 o 0 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cans light Goods 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 1 0 0 1 O 151 0 0 214 C..&yKco.— 0 0 0 _..-0 0 96.9 0 0 .....100 0 0 0 99.3 0 0 _..___.95.5.Buses 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Buses 0 0 0 0't 0 3.1 0 0 —__ 0 Smgie-LindTrucks 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 Si b-UnitTrucks — 0 o 0 0' 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks o 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MutatedTrucs0 0_.._ 0 _. ._0.t_— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0--...—UBicydesonRoad00000000000100r1 13,cycinson Road 0 0 0 0I 0 0 0 0 0-..,.. 0i 0 0_7- 0 0I 0.4 a sa c.....a 0 0 0 0# 0 0 0 0 0 O I 0 0 0 0; 0 y.46e.onGrommet 0 D 0 0....._ 0 0 0 0 0.__ 0', 0 0 0 0 i 0Pedestrians( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7} 0 0 0 0 l 7 Pedestrians , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100! 0 0 0 0 i 3.1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kukuau St-Kupukupu St Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KUKUAU ST KUPUKUPKU ST f KUKUAU ST From North From East From South__ From West __ Start Time Right Thru5Left 1 Peds T a T.,.t Right Thru Left ! Peds app rem Rett l Thru-1 Left I Peds"e,rem Right Tru` Left VPeds_f T.W kit.TotalPeakHourAnalysisFrom07:00 AM to 07:45 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 I 0 0 0 1 1 0 22 0 0 22 34 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 3 3 0 34 0 0 34 52 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 1 0 0 3 4 0 59 0 0 59 78 07:45 AM ___ 0 0 0 0 0,_.,._0_ _._,23 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 37, 60TotalVolume00000064006410078015200152224 N)p.Total 0 0.,_ 0 0 .____.. 0 100.... 0 0 12.5 0 0 87.5 0 100 0 0 PHF _Q00 .000 .000_ .40.9 .000 .000 .696 .000 .000 2i .r.t .000 .583 .500 .000 .644 .000 .000 .644 718_ fA t ; ofol (off I I a 0 of of q >0.!'//Right Thru Left Peds 1 Peak Hour Data F-J o U g y e. I. North C0c. I-2 a,x 0 a-Peak Hour Begins at07 00 AM a,>>Y -- a, r- r. C Y r Motorcycles sa U'i 5'0 a Cars&Light Goods a0oBusestiaaSingle-Unit Trucks w c m Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk Pedestrians CI% 4 t Leo- F Pasp.., 0 1t- 7 l 1ai L_$; Y, Out In Total O- 1 K.1Pt IKI1PKlI CT Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Will Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : KAPIOLANI ST-KUKUAU ST Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Motorcycles=Cors&Lightagods2 Buses-Unit Trucks-Articulated Trucks-Bicycles on Road-Bicycles on Crosswalk-Pedestrians I KAPIOLANI ST T KUKUAU ST KAPIOLANI ST KUKUAU ST From North From East From South From West Start Time Right i Thru Left Peds Right Thru, Left Peds Right I Thru Leh Pods Right Thru Left Peds'int.TOtal] 07:00 AM I 7 45 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 66 3 0 20 1 14 2 164 07:15 AM I 3 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 67 10 0 43 4 17 0 208 07:30 AM; 7 66 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 68 15 2 33 0 15 0 212 07.45 AM' 1_Q__ 6Q 1 -2- 2 1 3 2 1 78 6 20 4 18 1 204 Total 27 233 2 3 3 7 5 2 4 279 34 116 9 59 3 788 Grand Total 27 233 2 3( 3 7 5 2 4 279 34 i 116 9 59 3 I 788 Apprch% 10.2 87.9 0.8 1 1 I 17.6 41.2 29.4 11.8 1.3 87.5 10 7 0. 62 4,8 31.6 1.6 Total% i 3.4_,. 29.6 0_3------0.4 0.4 0.9 -__ 0.6 0.3 „ 0.5 „ 35.4 4 3 0.--- 14.7 1.1 755_._ 0.4 IMotorcyclesa0 Motorcyctes0 0 0 0 __ 0 0 0 Q_, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0_- Cars 8tight Goods ! 26 230 2 0 3 6 5 0 4 278 34 j 116 8 58 0 770 x urs aL_iymGDOdi ti---96.3__.98.7 100 -__0.__._-_100 85.7 100 0 100 99.6 100 100 88.9 98.3 0 97.7 Buses 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 6 Busesr 3.70.9 __0. _____0 0 _ _14 3 0 0 0 0.4._ 0 0 ____1.7 Single-Unit Trucks ; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0_____ 0 0__- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Artiadated Ttucks 0 0 _._...-.0 -_-._--0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4-__.__ 0 .-_ 0. 0 Bicydes ort Road 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 eii ctes on Road _-_-_0 _3-4 0 ___D__ 0 ___0 _____.4__._ _._0..____.3_.-_6_______ 0 0 11.1 0 0_ 0.3 eitydaeon ca,awaa 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Lind.ofcre..w,w 0 0 0 33.3 0 0 0 0 0 a._-__..__0a .._;.w__ 0 0___.._._a_-___33.3 0.3 Pedestrians 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 8 Pedestrians 0 0 0 66.7 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 66.7 1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : KAPIOLANI ST-KUKUAU ST Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KAPIOLANI ST 7 KUKUAU ST KAPIOLANI ST KUKUAU ST FpniNofth From E .1WFrekm SoLith7- I-Start Time7Right I Thru I Left 1 PedSTApp.roue ,Right I Thru! Left j Peds I .49 taw Right' Thru Left Peds I Rifihru LeftIIPeds Ape Teta,LInt TOW]Ill,Taal Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AI 7 45 0 1 53 0 5 0 0 5 0 66 3 0 69 20 1 14 2 37 164 07:15 AM 3 62 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 2 67 10 0 79 43 4 17 0 64 i 208 07:30 AM 7 66 1 0 74 1 1 2 0 4 1 68 15 2 86 33 0 15 0 48 1 212 07:45 AM 10 60 1 2 73. 2 1 3 2 ; 1 78 .6,_ 20 4 13 1 38_1_ 204TotalVcgurne2723323265' 3 7 5 2 17 4 279 34 2 319 116 9 59 3 187 788 43p,Total 101 87.9 08 1.1 17.6 41.2 29.4 11.8 1.3 87.5 10.7 0.6 62 4.8 31.6 1.6 PHF .675 .883 .500 .375 .895 .375 .350 AI] .250 .531 .500 .894 567 .250 .927 .674 .563 .08_ .375 .730_..,..9Z9.. KAP1OtANI ST aiY'', ' C1.14- ....41... T.9181_4t,,.,i 3411 [......,2861 r 6061 k....'.: i• 7 Flitri......Z.L.. 2i 31 Ri9ht Thru Left Peds 4 ' i 1 e•-•&, 1 L__. . Peak Hour Data A.Si 0.1 th,North cn 4 ..- •- c I.-2 ,x Peak Hour Begins at 0700 AM 5"c I x ,,,,, icc • 1 Motorcycles n4,, I Cars 8 Light Goods o ,w.,,, 1 Buses nwa taVa. 1 Single-Unit Trucks 0 ,, Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road 7 Bicycles on Crosswalk L Pedestrians An%74k 1 I AG Leitmil' Ilighl Pads L___,341_179 LI57911 j t..-.-47.3! a')Out In Total RAPIN ANI ST Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kapiolani St-Hualalai St Site Code : 19-524 UHC Hilo Kaiaulu TEAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Motorcycles-Cars&Light Goods-Buses-Unit Trucks-Articulated Trucks-Bicycles on Road-Bicycles on Crosswalk-PedestriansIKAPIOLANISTHUALALAISTKAPIOLANISTHUALALAIST 4 From North From East From South FromWestStartTimeRight[ Thru I Left I Peds Right I Thru Left i Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right 1 Thru j Left Peds Int.Total j07:00 AM 1 0 44 15 0 13 0 5 0 21 70 3 0 3 7 0 1 18207:15 AM I 0 48 22 0 13 0 10 0 51 61 5 0 5 4 0 0 21907:30 AM' 1 74 35 0 21 0 11 0 53 76 3 0 4 6 0 0 284 07:45AM F 1 38 12- 0 14 0 7 1 27 45. 2 00 4 0 151_Total 2 204 84 0 61 0 33 1 152 252 13 0I 12 21 0 1 836 Grand Total I 2 204 84 0 61 0 33 1 152 252 13 0 12 21 0 1 1 836Apprch% 1 0.7 70 3 29 0 64.2 0 34.7 1.1 36.5 60.4 3.1 0 35.3 61.8 0 2.9 iTotal%r 0.2 24:4 10_..-_.-.___.0 7.3 0 3.9 0.1 18.2 30.1._ __1.6_._.._ 0 1.4 2.5 0__-._0T1.Motorcycles I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 056Matorcyles 1 0 0 0 0 1__- 0 0 0 0 _ 0 _ 0 0 t r r _ 0 _ 0 0_carsanightGaols 2 203 83 0 I 60 0 33 0 149 252 12 0 11 21 0 0 I 826 scrs e lgMcooda} 100 99.5 98.8 __0 98.4 0 __ 100 .... 0 I 98 _ 100_, ,._92. _„µ,-0 __91.7 100 0 ____ 0 i 98.8 Buses; 11 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of3Buses; 0 0 5 1.2..--- 0 I 1.6 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 _-__-0 _---Singe-UM Trucks 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 sskgEe-urntTrias _ 0 0 0... 0 t 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0_ 0 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1Arfcu}ated Trude l ., D_._. 0 0 .____.f_ _._...._.__.0 0 _.__.Q.._. 0.-. --..Q_ _-_7.7_..__.- 0.__._ 00BicyclesonRoad' 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 i 1 Eicydes on Road _-- 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0___ .o____. o I o 0 0 0. 0 o_._-- o 0 8. 0 ..-__0 0 0.1Bic-n*54n 0 o o ti 9,,=wma Crosswalk 0 0 ad 4...... 0 0 0 -0 0 0 __._..-..0 0 0 _ o -...o..------- o -- 0 Pedestrians' 0 0 0 0; 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 . 2 Pedestrians - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 100 0. Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kapiolani St-Hualalai St Site Code : 19-524 UHC Hilo Kaiaulu TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KAPIOLANI ST ST KAPIOLANI ST HUALALAI ST From Nath FrothEp _t I From South From West Start Tarte Right 1ThrujLeftPeds J ,0 Tom,RigM Thru; Left Peds i Am rar,,Right I Thru I Left;Peds : APP Tow;Right Thru Left I Peds; A Ta intTote'''Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 1 0 44 15 0 59 f 13 0 5 0 18' 21 70 3 0 94 I 3 7 0 1 11 182 07:15 AM i 0 . 48 22 0 70 13 0 10 0 23 i 51 61 5 0 117 1 5 4 0 0 9 219 07:30 AM 1 74 35 0 110 21 0 11 0 32 53 76 3 0 132 I 4 6 0 0 10 284 07.45 AM 1 38 12_-- 0 51 14 0 7 1 7 45 2 0 74 0 4 0 0 4 151 Total Volume 2 204 84 0 290 61 0 33 1 95 i 152 252 13 0 417 12 21 0 1 34 836 r App Total 0.7 70.3 29 0 64.2 0 34.7 1.1 I 36.5 60.4 3.1 0 35.3 61.8 0 2.9 PHF 500 .689 ,600 000 .659 1 ,726 000_-..750 _250_._ 74 f 717 _829 .650 .000 790 .600 .750 .000 .250 _773_.^_736_ KAPIOLANI ST 4.0.,° r 313 12901 Total 5431 2] 204, 84 0. // f!, Q. N Right Thru Left Peds O'-ji Peak Hour Data S 1_N` North i I g Cn , 2 a rLZPeakHourBeginsat07.00 AM 1 -f D r o D O 1 Motorcycles r 61di `` i Cars&Light Goods a Buses uail'0.Single-Und Trucks a .'"'_1--- ArticulatedArticulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk o0,,/7 4-] a T2-, -._ 252. 12 al i,,\j 1-2.441 L_ 417 $fly: Out In Taat i KAPI[II ANI ST l Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kukuau St-Kupukupu St Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groins Printed-Motorcycles-Cars 8L htGoods-Buses-Unit Trucks-Articulated Trucks-Bicycles on Road•Bicycleson Crosswalk-Pedestrians KUKUAU ST KUPUKUPKU ST KUKUAU ST 1 L._From North r From East From South From West I Start Time Right Thru 1 Left 1 Peds, Right Thru Left i Peds Right Thru 1 left Peds Right ; Thru Left! Peds Int.Total 0.3:45 PM 1 0 000 25 0 0 ,__....-_ U I 0 18 o44._ Total 0 0 0! 0 25 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 44 04:00 PM 0 0 0 1 0 23 0 0 I 0 0 0! 1 30 0 0) 54 04:15 PM 0 0 0! 0 28 0 0 0 0 11 0 31 0 0 60 04:30 PM 0 0 0 1 0 47 0 0 i 0 0 3 0 31 0 0 81 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 I 0 0 5 1 110 0 0 239 Apprch% 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 1 0 0 100 0.9 99.1 0 0 Total%1 0 0 0 0 51.5 O 0 O 0 — 2.1 0.4 46 0 0 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Motorcycles 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 ' 0 0 0._ 0_ 0 CarsaEight Goods i 0 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 0 01 109 0 0 232 Can 6 Goob_.----_0 0 0 0 992 0 01 0 0 010099.1 0 0_--_-- 97.1. Buses. 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o_ ..__0 0 0000001 s te-unr Tmd,s 4 0 P. - 0 0 0.8--___-- 0 0: 0 0 0' 0 0 0- 0 0.4 o Buses 0 0 0 0 0 se ie-um Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3=3 0 0 0 0 0 Ysnrbwatedrn,cks> ..-0... -..U _. 0 1 00_----0 0. _..-_0 -. 0__._.-_._0 t__ 0.-..__ 0 0 0 0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 cycles on Roee 4 0 o 0 0 .__ 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.9 _.. 0 0! 0.4 CyClef 0r1Cf.SW&Ik 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 eaneso,,C,o,s.w;. 0 0 O j 0 0 --- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'_. 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 Pedestrians 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 01 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 2.1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kukuau St-Kupukupu St Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KUKUAU ST i KUPUKUPKU ST KUKUAU ST PeStartak Hour TineRh From 03: orth From Frorrt FromWell --E From N I ht Left P; Peds r m Right( Thru Left ;Peds ,her RightThru, left? Peds ,y.Teri Right,Thru Left Pedsi 4,r,,* Int riaAnalysisMto04:30PM-Peak1of1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 ' 0 25 0 0 25 0 0 0 1 1 0 18 0 0 18 ' 4404:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 0 0 31 5404:15 PM • 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 0 1 1 0 31 0 0 31 6004:30PM_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 47 0 0 0 3 3_._0 31 0 0 31 81ITotalVolume0000001230012300055111000111239IIAppTotall0000__._.._.__._... o 100 0 0 0 0 0 100PMF7 .000 000 000 0.9 99.1 0 0000 =000 .000_. .000( .000 .654.000 654 1 _000.000 .417 417. .251) .187 .000 .000 895; .738 k/N put 1n Total r a L a _9 v t- ol ora_ 1 o! { v4 o` `, Thru Left Pads C.; 4C. l Peak Hour Data CRC .V0NG, I-T. D 0 aNorth 47 s -..) i T. 2N xa_- w CPeakHourBeginsat03:45 PM 3 ygrc+ Cj4 <z , 'Ce 'i, Motorcycles 0 ' Carse Light Goods i rf Buses a' N Single-Unit Trucks 6 `ka"'— Articulated Trucks p Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk Pedestrians ,-- N. k Ft P j 4 .Out In Total KIIPIIKllPf4lt ST Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 He Name : KAPIOLANI ST-KUKUAU ST Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TEAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Motorcycles-Cars&Light Goods-Buses-Unit Trucks_Articulated Trucks-Bicycles onRoad-Bicycles on Crosswalk-Pedestrians KAPIOLANI ST KUKUAU ST KAPIOLANI ST KUKUAU ST From North From East From South From West j Start Time Right l Thru I Left Peds I Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru T Left Peds Right Thru[ Left i Peds lint.Total 03:45 PM 3. 52 0 01 0 3 0 1 1 14 1 » 1 13 -11 155- Total 3 52 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 1 48 14 1 17 1 13 1t' 155 04:00 PM 12 41 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 46 21 0 9 2 18 2! 155 04:15 PM 15 50 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 46 27 1 12 0 19 1 i 176 04:30 PM 17 66 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 67 27 0 9 2 15 0 i 208 Grand Total 47 209 1 0 4 10 1 1 2 207 89 2 47 5 65 4 1 694 Apprch% 18 3 81.3 0.4 0 t 25 62 5 6.2 6.2 0.7 69 29.7 0.7 38.8 4.1 53.7 3.3 1 Total% 6 8 30.1 0,1 . 0.1. 0.1 0.3 _29.8 12.8. 0.3 _-_ 6.8 0 7 9.4_. 0.6+. — Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 1 Motorcycles 1 0-----_Q 0 0 1 _ _0I .....-_0.- D_._ 0.....__ 0 0.5 ...0 0 0 _ 0 0 0;__._.. 0.1 Can a LightGoodsT 47 208 1 0i 4 10 1 0. 2 206 89 0 47 4 65 0 684 canslgmc I 100 _...995, 100 0„¢ 100100 100 01 100 99.5..---100----.__0_..-,_-.100 --- 80_ 100-__._- 0 - 98.6 Buses 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0= 0 Buses 4 0 __ 0, ,, 0 0 0- 0 0._- Q. r 0 ._.._.. 0 — 0, Single-Unit Trucks • 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 o 0 1 0 X Single-Unit Trurxs 0 0... .... .. _ 0_ ...,.__.0 0 __ 0, -.. 0 _ 0 _ . 0.._._–0 0 _0 0 o! 0 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Artcutated Trucks... 0 0.- 0_-..._ 0 0 0_--..__0 i 0. 0 0_- .Q....._.__. 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles on Road t 0 1 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 lcacydes on aced 0 0.5 00 0 1 0 . 0, -0—---0 i 0 0 ------0 .__.._.4._.__0 __ .._ 0 0 . 0.3- ertyueson CA-4.n;k 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5_sysir os, 0 0 0 0i' 0 0 _ 0 ..0 0 0 -- 0 0 i_...__0 0 0 0_ 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2' 0 0 0 4 7 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : KAPIOLANI ST-KUKUAU ST Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KAPIOLANI ST KUKUAU ST KAPIOLANI ST KUKUAU.STFromNorthFromEastFromSouthFromWestStartTimeRx1ht_ Thru LeftTPeds 1 rtRrotignt I Thru I Left Peds , taa+ Right Thru; Left Pads I e.roe_Right I Thru I Left Peds 1 TowPeakHourAnalysisFrom03:45 PM to 04:30 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 3 52 0 0 55 0 3 0 1 4 1 48 14 1 64! 17 1 13 1 32, 15504:00 PM 12 41 1 0 54 1 2 0 0 3 0 46 21 0 67 9 2 18 2 31 15504:15 PM 15 50 0 0 65 1 0 3 1 0 4 1 46 27 1 75 12 0 19 1 32 17604:30 PM 17 _-_66 0 0 83_ 3 2 0 0 5--- 0 67.._. 27— 0 94: 9 2 15 ..,_0 26 _.208..Total volume 47 209 1 0 257 4 10 1 1 16 2 207 89 2 300; 47 5 65 4 121 694App.Total I 18.3 81.3 0.4 0 25 82.5 6.2 6.2 0.7 69 29.7 0.7 38.8 4.1 53.7 3aPHF! .691.._.792 .250 .000 .774 . 333 .833 250 .250 .800 . .500 .772 .824 .500....,.29.&L .691 .625 __55„_.500 .945.ff a KAPIOLANI ST Out 2 TotalAs. VT 276 .257. 533 i' 471 209 1 0 04'/‘, Right Ther Left Pads j r p U Peak Hour Data HN J s 0 v F- North cn 4 2 ca Peak Hour Begins at 03:45 PP l c 114.t O a' D r.• a! c Y..v re . Motorcycles atn d Cars&Light GoodsO!Buses6 4Single-Una Trucks t,_.` p. Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk I TPedestrons/ I r'r, Lek., TP q-;891 LI 1 207 2 2 V> / 2S7i L 3100] L 5571 I \ cda Out In Total 1 \KAPIO!ANI AT Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kapiolani St-Hualalai St Site Code : 19-524 UHC Hilo Kaiaulu TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed-Motorcycles-Cars 8 Light Goods-Buses_Unit Trucks-Articulated Trucks-Bicycles on Road-Bicycles on Crosswalk-Pgdestrians I KAPIOLANI ST HUALALAI ST KAPIOLANI ST I HUALALAI ST From Northr..,. __. FromEast From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right 1 Thru Left I Pads Right Thru 1 Left Pads Right 1 Thruj- Left I Peds i Int.Total 03:45 PM 1 55 13 0, 24. 12 12 ___,Q,_ 15 35 __Q. r 1___-- 4 1 0 I 173 Total T 1 55 13 0 I 24 12 12 0 15 35 0 0 ' 1 4 1 0 173 04:00 PM 2 62 14 0 14 5 18 0 13 39 1 0 2 8 0 0 178 04:15 PM 0 42 11 0 I 19 8 22 1 15 49 1 0 1 7 1 0 177 04:30 PM 0 87 24 0 I 28 6 36 0 7 55 1 0 1 2 0 0 247 Grand Total 3 246 62 0 i 85 31 88 1 50 178 3 0 5 21 2 0 775 Apprch% 1 79.1 191 0'. 41.5 15.1 42.9 0.5 21 6 77.1 1.3 0 17.9 75 7.1 0 Total%i 0.4 31.7 8 0 i 11 411 4 0.1 6.5 23 ...__ 0.4 0 _- 0.6..___ 2.7—.. 0.3_,._- 0,I„ Motorcycles' 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0' 0 0 0 0 1 Motorcycles i . 0 0 _0..- _ 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0t 0__. 0 0 01 carsa ugnt Goods ' 3 246 62 0 I 84 31 88 0 I 50 177 3 0 5 21 2 0 I 772 c.r.n L ani cao_ 100 _100 100 04_ 98.8 _100 100--_._._.__0 100 99.4 100 0 100 ___100 100_--- 0 99.6 Buses 0 0 0; 0 0 0 0! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Buses i 0 0-._.__ 0! 0__.._..._.0 0 0 0 0 0 e0._.__._ 0 0 0 Smgie-Unci Trucks 0 0 0 l 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 1 Sog.trunitTrucks 0 0 0 12 0 0 -_.._.._.-_0 0 0 0 0 I _—0 0 0 0.1 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Arbadat.dTrucks p-- -2._ 0 o__..---0- o -- ._.0 ', 0 0.__---- 4___ __.9 -------2.. 0 0 0 cycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cyclesoR a__.--0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0__. o ° 0 -1 0 --0. ew.j^les on Crosswalk 0 0 0! 0 0 0 0 0 0 • -0 0 0 0 0: o s_ „.Crouwai 0__ 0 .-._.0- 0 o __. 0 0-1 0___ 0._... 0 a ..._.._._ 0 0 0 1 o Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 OI 1 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 1 0.1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kapiolani St-Hualalai St Site Code : 19-524 UHC Hilo Kaiaulu TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KAPIOtANI ST HUALALAI ST i KAROLANI ST HUALALAI ST Time From East I From South From WestStartRight;Thru -( Peds ms TamI Right(Thru. Left ' Peds; =,u IRON)"Thru i Left Peds App Tote. Right Thru Left Peds .4p TotalirIm,row lPeakHourAnalysisFrom03:45 PM to 04:30 PM-Peak 1 of 1 Peak Flour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 1 55 13 0 69 24 12 12 0 48 15 35 0 0 50 1 4 1 0 6 17304.00 PM 2 62 14 0 78 14 5 18 0 37 13 39 1 0 53 2 8 0 0 10 17804:15 PM 0 42 11 0 53 19 8 22 1 50 j 15 49 1 0 65 1 7 1 0 9 17704:30 PM 0 87 24 0 111 28 6 36 0 70 1 7 55 1 0 ... 63 1 2 0 0 3 _.._.247.Total Volume 3 246 62 0 311 85 31 88 1 205 50 178 3 0 231 j 5 21 2 0 28 775oAppTotal179.1 19.9 0 41.5 15.1 42.9 0.5 21.6 77.1 1.3 0 17.9 75 7.1 0PI-IF .375 .707 ,646 .000 .700 I_759 64¢-__._611 .2,50 _.732 .832,_ .809 .750 .000 .. 88 I .625 .656 .500 .000 .700 .784 IO ANI ST I /KAP r 265;..nil (-It 1 ,i I 3i*__246L_621 of O°, `> Right Thru Left Peds 4 4. 45 Peak Hour Data C7co Nz t-2.1 - iU--.41 i__ North 51_ -- T,;—Peak Hour Begins 0103:45 PM f. r -1 i _l Motorcycles 4-3. 07 Cars&Light Goods 17- "' I Lill Buses 1: I : w Single-Unit Trucks i-I--- ud Articulated Trucks CC Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk P.itle_strians rn 4 I g c0 La2 Thtu. . P j 1 1 1I311781 _.QO 0 i•0 r 39 231I i 570 o)Out In Total CP KAPint ANI ST ATA AuSTIN,TSUTSLIMI A350C,ATE ,.NrC CtVfl.ClUCeSn- nc: . sz, 111111II=.10.1111.11.1ft APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA mow APPENDIX B - LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA VEHICULAR LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6th Edition) Level of service for vehicles at signalized intersections is directly related to delay values and is assigned on that basis. Level of Service is a measure of the acceptability of delay values to motorists at a given intersection. The criteria are given in the table below. Level-of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Control Delay per Level of Service Vehicle (sec./veh.) A 10.0 B 10.0 and 5 20.0 C 20.0 and 5 35.0 D 35.0 and <_ 55.0 E 55.0 and 5 80.0 F 80.0 Delay is a complex measure, and is dependent on a number of variables, including the quality of progression, the cycle length, the green ratio, and the v/c ratio for the lane group or approach in question. VEHICULAR LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6th Edition) The level of service criteria for vehicles at unsignalized intersections is defined as the average control delay, in seconds per vehicle. LOS delay threshold values are lower for two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) and all-way stop- controlled (AWSC) intersections than those of signalized intersections. This is because more vehicles pass through signalized intersections, and therefore, drivers expect and tolerate greater delays While the criteria for level of service for TWSC and AWSC intersections are the same, procedures to calculate the average total delay may differ. Level of Service Criteria for Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections Level of Average Control Delay Service sec/veh) A 55 10 B 10and 515 C 15and 5-25 D 25 and 535 E 35 and 550 F 50 ATA AusT.,4 Tt t•vt.,73.7.11 APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS ATA AUSTIN TSt.T$UMI&A:rScC.ATES, C,V14 ENGA'fPrig • g;rt+v4'r(Sas APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS Existing AM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06,12'2019 intersection rt Delay.s'veh 0 EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 1+ 4 'te" Traffic Vol,vehfh 152 0 0 64 0 1 Future Vol.veh/h 152 0 0 64 0 1 Conflicting Peds,ft/hr 0 7 7 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade,% 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 165 0 0 70 0 1 Major/Minor Majorl MM1a,or2 Minor I Conflicting Flow All 0 0 172 0 242 172 Stage 1 172 - Stage 2 70 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1405 - 746 872 Stage 1 858 - Stage 2 953 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1396 - 741 866 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 741 - Stage 1 852 - Stage 2 953 - Approach EB WB ' HCM Control Delay s 0 9 2 HCA1 Minor Lane/Major Pelvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 866 - - 1396 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - - • HCM Control Delay(s) 9.2 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - Z:1201909-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\Existing\Existing AM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Int Delay.siveh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WE3L WBT WBR N L NBT NSR SBL SBR Lane Configurations 4, 4, Traffic Vol.veh/h 59 9 116 5 7 3 34 279 4 2 233 27 Future Vol,vehfh 59 9 116 5 7 3 34 279 4 2 233 27 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 3 0 2 2 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 3 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage.# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.%2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 64 10 126 5 8 3 37 303 4 2 253 29 Ma.jtvndr24llfllt;?, 0404: rv_,. t _.X AR401844'ro " ''r44041' Conflicting Flow All 663 658 273 723 670 310 285 0 0 309 0 0 Stage 1 275 275 - 381 381 - - - - - - - Stage 2 388 383 - 342 289 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6 22 7.12 6.52 6 22 4.12 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6 12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3 318 3.518 4 018 3 318 2.218 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 375 384 766 342 378 730 1277 - - 1252 - - Stage 1 731 683 - 641 613 - - - - - - - Stage 2 636 612 - 673 673 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 355 368 762 271 362 727 1273 - - 1250 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 355 368 - 271 362 - - - - - - Stage 1 703 680 - 617 590 - - - - - Stage 2 601 589 - 551 670 - - - - - oach EB HCM Control Delay,s 15.6 15.5 0.8 0 1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLd1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(vehfh) 1273 - - 537 358 1250 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - - 0.372 0 046 0 002 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 7.9 0 - 15.6 15.5 7.9 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th%tile Ct(veh) 0.1 - - 1.7 0,1 0 - - D2019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani4Existing\Existing AM.syn Synchro 10 ReportAustin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Intersection Int Delay s vnn Movement EBL EBI EBR VVBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 4. 4. Traffic Vol vehlh 0 21 12 33 0 61 13 252 152 84 204 2 Future Vol.vehlh 0 21 12 33 0 61 13 252 152 84 204 2 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage.# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,%2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 23 13 36 0 66 14 274 165 91 222 2 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Maj Conflicting Flow All 824 874 224 809 793 358 225 0 0 440 0 :- Stage 1 406 406 - 386 386 - - - - - Stage 2 418 468 - 423 407 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5 52 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5 52 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3 318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 292 288 815 299 321 686 1344 - - 1120 - Stage 1 622 598 - 637 610 - - - - - - Stage 2 612 561 - 609 597 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 242 257 814 252 287 685 1343 - - 1119 - - May Cap-2 Maneuver 242 257 - 252 287 - - - - - - Stage 1 613 542 - 627 601 - - - - - - Stage 2 545 553 - 521 541 - - Approach EB v3 P16 S3 HCM Control Delay,s 16.8 1 ' HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt IBL f BT NBR EBLnSBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1343 - - 342 427 1119 - HCM Lane V!C Ratio 0.011 - - 0 105 0.239 0.082 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 7.7 0 - 16.8 16.1 8.5 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.9 0.3 - - Z:12019119-524 Kaiaulu 0 KapiolanilExistingtExisting AM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 3 ATArsu,su„„,6 A3 vC.art'a •h.{. C•vtt ENGevf rns . Rnmwe+pag APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS Existing PM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/1212019 Intersection Nloww.t. EBT EBR VOL WBT NBL Lane Configurations j. 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 110 1 0 123 0 0 Future Vol,vehih 110 1 0 123 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 5 5 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade-% 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 120 1 0 134 0 0 Major/Minor Majorl Conflicting Flow All 0 0 126 0 260 126 Stage 1 126 - Stage 2 134 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5 42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3 518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1460 - 729 924 Stage 1 900 - Stage 2 892 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1453 - 725 920 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 725 - Stage 1 896 - Stage 2 892 - Approach EB WB NB i,. HCM Control Delay.s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A MinorLane/Major-Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR VJBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 1-153 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay(s) G - - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) C - Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\Existing\Existing PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 1 HCM 6th TVVSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Intersection Int Delay. shell 4 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VAR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. 4. 4+ Traffic Vol,veh/h 65 5 47 1 10 4 89 207 2 1 209 47 Future Vol vehlh 65 5 47 1 10 4 89 207 2 1 209 47 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, o 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 71 5 51 1 11 4 97 225 2 1 227 51 MaiorlMi 41 M1nor2 Minorl - Major1 Major2 41111.11 Conflicting Flow All 687 681 259 706 705 227 282 0 0 228 0 0 Stage 1 259 259 - 421 421 - - - Stage 2 428 422 - 285 284 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4 12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5 52 - 6.12 5 52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2 218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 361 373 780 351 361 812 1280 - - 1340 - - Stage 1 746 694 - 610 589 - - - - - - - Stage 2 605 588 - 722 676 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 325 339 776 301 328 811 1275 - - 1339 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 325 339 - 301 328 - - - - - - - Stage 1 679 691 - 556 537 - - - - - - - Stage 2 538 536 - 667 673 - - - - - - - APproact , x;,:1`8 013 NB 44110PM HCM Control Delay,s 17 14.7 2.4 0 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLin1VVBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1275 - - 425 387 1339 - - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0 076 - - 0 299 0.042 0.001 HCM Control Delay(s) 8 1 0 - 17 14.7 7.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A. A - C B A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 1.2 0.1 0 - - Z:12019119-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\ExistinglExisting PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Int Delay s'veh 6 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR VWBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations e , Fj.. 4+ 4. Traffic Vol,vehlh 2 21 5 88 31 85 3 178 50 62 246 3 Future Vol.vehlh 2 21 5 88 31 85 3 178 50 62 246 3 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage.# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 2 23 5 96 34 92 3 193 54 67 267 3 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majorl Major2 111111.11.111111.04111.1. Conflicting Flow All 692 657 269 644 631 221 270 0 0 248 0 0 Stage 1 403 403 - 227 227 - - - Stage 2 289 254 - 417 404 - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6 22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 612 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 6 12 5.52 - 6 12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3 318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 358 385 770 386 398 819 1293 - - 1318 - - Stage 1 624 600 - 776 716 - - - - - - - Stage 2 719 697 - 613 599 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 282 360 770 347 373 818 1293 - - 1317 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 282 360 - 347 373 - - - - - - - Stage 1 622 564 - 773 713 - - - - - - - Stage 2 606 694 - 549 563 - - - Approach HCM Control Delay.s 15 19Y 0.1 1 i3 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1293 - - 389 463 1317 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0 078 0.479 0.051 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 7.8 0 - 15 19.7 7.9 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 2 5 0.2 - - Z:12019)19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\Existing\Existing PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 3 TAaurru.,,rsursuMu s At OGaTes. r : Cvt r.,wn.cant • KI P.TVF rpna APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS Base Year 2021 AM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06'1212019 Intersection Int Delav, s'sr9ri 2 tret EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations I. 4 '' Traffic Vol,vehfh 175 0 0 75 0 5 Future Vol. veh/h 175 0 0 75 0 5 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 7 7 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage.# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade. % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.%2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 190 0 0 82 0 5 MajorlMinor Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 197 0 279 197 Stage 1 197 - Stage 2 82 - Critical Hdwy 4,12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5 42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1376 - 711 844 Stage 1 836 - Stage 2 941 - Platoon blocked % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1367 - 706 838 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 706 - Stage 1 830 - Stage 2 941 - Approach EB Y'JB NB HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 9 3 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(veh/h) 838 - 1367 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - - - HCM Control Delay(s) 9.3 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - Z.12019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\BY 20211BY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Intersection MEV .in Cel3y s'veh 5 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WET WBR NEL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4, 4,, 4+Traffic Vol,veh/h 70 10 125 10 10 5 40 305 10 5 255 35 Future Vol.vehlh 70 10 125 10 10 5 40 305 10 5 255 35 Conflicting Peds,Or 3 0 2 2 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 3 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade.% 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,%2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 76 11 136 11 11 5 43 332 11 5 277 38 Ma ritdiMitiV4; 0,1 Conflicting Flow All 744 740 301 808 754 343 318 0 0 345 0 0 Stage 1 309 309 - 426 426 - - - - - Stage 2 435 431 - 382 328 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7 12 6.52 6 22 7.12 6 52 6.22 4 12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6 12 5.52 - 6 12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6 12 5,52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3 518 4.018 3.318 2.218 -2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 331 345 739 299 338 700 1242 - - 1214 - - Stage 1 701 660 - 606 586 - - - - - Stage 2 600 583 - 640 647 - - - - - - _ Platoon blocked.°j, Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 307 327 735 228 320 697 1238 - - 1212 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 307 327 - 228 320 - - - - - - - Stage 1 669 655 - 579 560 - - - - - - - Stage 2 557 557 - 509 642 - - - - - - - WB 1111111111111111111111.11111111111111111111111111111111111111HCMControlDelay. s 18.9 18 0.9 0 1 HCM LOS C C Minor LanelMajorMvrnt NBL NST NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1238 - - 478 304 1212 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 035 - - 0.466 0 089 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 8 0 - 18.9 18 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th%tile 0(veh) 0.1 - - 2.4 0.3 0 - - Z12019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 KapiolanilBY 2021\BY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin,Tsutsumi&Associates Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Intersection Int Delay s'veh 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 25 15 35 5 65 15 300 160 85 225 5 Future Vol,veh/h 0 25 15 35 5 65 15 300 160 85 225 5 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade.% 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,%2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 27 16 38 5 71 16 326 174 92 245 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minar1 Majorl, Major2 Conflicting Flow All 916 966 249 899 881 414 251 0 0 501 0 0 Stage 1 433 433 - 446 446 - - - - - - - Stage 2 483 533 - 453 435 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4 12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6 12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5 52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2 218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 253 255 790 260 285 638 1314 - - 1063 - - Stage 1 601 582 - 591 574 - - - - - - - Stage 2 565 525 - 586 580 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked.% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 201 225 789 211 251 637 1313 - - 1062 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 201 225 - 211 251 - - - - - - - Stage 1 590 523 - 580 564 - - - - - - - Stage 2 489 516 - 489 521 Approach EB WB, NB HCM Control Delay.s 18.7 19.3 0.2 2.4 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1313 - 307 365 1062 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0 142 0 313 0.087 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 7.8 0 - 18.7 19.3 8.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0 - - 0.5 1.3 0.3 - - Z:12019119-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\BY 20211BY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin,Tsutsumi&Associates Page 3 ATA AUSTN TSUTSUMI 6ASSOC.ATES_,NC APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS Base Year 2021 PM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06;1212019 Astection IntDela/ s 0 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurators j+ 4 Traffic Vol.veh/h 135 5 0 150 0 0 Future Vol,veh/h 135 5 0 150 0 0 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 5 5 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade. % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 147 5 0 163 0 0 Major/Minor, Major2 Minors Conflicting Flow All 0 0 157 0 318 155 Stage 1 155 - Stage 2 163 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1423 - 675 891 Stage 1 873 - Stage 2 866 - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1416 - 672 887 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 672 - Stage 1 869 - Stage 2 866 - EE J4B I E HCM Control Delay.s 0 0 0 HCM LOS Minor LanelMajor Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(vehfh) 1415 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay(s) 0 - - 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - Z:12019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\BY 20211BY 2021 PM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06!12/2019 Intersection int Delay s :eh 5 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations j, 4, 4+ 4.Traffic Vol,veh/h 80 5 55 5 10 5 100 235 5 5 235 65 Future Vol vehth 80 5 55 5 10 5 100 235 5 5 235 65 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 87 5 60 5 11 5 109 255 5 5 255 71 Major$ i-i{; 3a ,Ainor2 Minar1 Major! Major2 Conflicting Flow All 789 784 297 812 817 259 330 0 0 261 0 C Stage 1 305 305 - 477 477 - - - - - - - Stage 2 484 479 - 335 340 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4 12 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6 12 5 52 - 6.12 5 52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6 12 5 52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3 518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4 018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 308 325 742 298 311 780 1229 - - 1303 - - Stage 1 705 662 - 569 556 - - - - - - - Stage 2 564 555 - 679 639 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 271 288 738 247 276 779 1224 - - 1302 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 271 288 - 247 276 - - - - Stage 1 630 656 - 509 498 - - - - Stage 2 491 497 - 615 633 - - - Approach EB1•1111111111111111111111111111111111111, E HCM Control Delay.s 22 17.2 2.4 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SER Capacity(vehlh) 1224 - - 362 318 1302 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.089 - - 0.42 0.068 0 004 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 8.2 0 - 22 17.2 7.8 0 HCM Lane LOS A A - CC A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 2 0 2 0 - - Z:\2019119-524 Kaiaulu 0 KapiolanilBY 2021\BY 2021 PM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin,Tsutsumi&Associates Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/1212019 Intersection In'Delay s veh 9 Movement EBL EST EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol,veh/h 5 25 5 95 35 85 5 210 55 65 300 5 Future Vol.vehih 5 25 5 95 35 85 5 210 55 65 300 5 Conflicting Peds.#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage.# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade.% 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 27 5 103 38 92 5 228 60 71 326 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majod Major2 Conflicting Flow All 804 770 329 756 742 259 331 0 0 289 0 0 Stage 1 471 471 - 269 269 - - - Stage 2 333 299 - 487 473 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6 52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5 52 - 6.12 5 52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4 018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2 218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 301 331 712 325 344 780 1228 - - 1273 - - Stage 1 573 560 - 737 687 - - - - - - - Stage 2 681 666 - 562 558 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 228 307 712 284 319 779 1228 - - 1272 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 228 307 - 284 319 - - - - - - - Stage 1 570 522 - 733 683 - - - - - - - Stage 2 564 662 - 493 520 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB GB HCM Control Delay.s 17.9 27 2 0 1 1 HCM LOS C D MinorLaneiMajorMvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(vehlh) 1228 - - 317 389 1272 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.12 0.601 0.056 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 7.9 0 - 17.9 27.2 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C D A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 3 8 0 2 - - Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapioiani\BY 20211BY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 3 ATAN,6TeN TsuTsum.6 ABSCC,4YES,rc.,t' c„...fNGr;ffn9 • tie.WVE roma APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS Future Year 2021 AM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Intersection Int Delay s,, t- 1 7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations 4 Traffic Vol.vehfh 175 5 5 75 5 10 Future Vol.veh/h 175 5 5 75 5 10 Conflicting Peds,#Jhr 0 7 7 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade.% 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,%2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 190 5 5 82 5 11 M.,orIMinor g, i{-,or '„'"e`w,,„. Conflicting Flow All 0 0 202 0 292 200 Stage 1 200 - Stage 2 92 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5 42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1370 - 699 841 Stage 1 834 - Stage 2 932 - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1361 - 691 835 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 691 - Stage 1 825 - Stage 2 932 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay.s 0 0.5 9.7 HCM LOS h Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(vehfh)781 - - 1361 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 0.004 - HCM Control Delay(s) 9.7 - - 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - Z.120191119-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiotani\FY 20211FY 2021 AM.syn Synchrc 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 2'S.f ti+G ,3 trxk,' 2f xp.z: Z 4ilkbu7lh.sv ,fikr'T .a.. fir'i„fxl ,o.j T' Int Delay.s/veh 5.6 wd ... Lane Configurations 4 40 4 4+Traffic Vol,veh/h 75 10 125 10 10 5 40 310 10 5 260 35 Future Vol,veh/h 75 10 125 10 10 5 40 310 10 5 260 35 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 3 0 2 2 0 3 3 0 2 2 0 3 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage,# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade,% 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,%2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 82 11 136 11 11 5 43 337 11 5 283 38 Conflicting Flow All 755 751 307 819 765 348 324 0 0 350 0 0 Stage 1 315 315 - 431 431 - Stage 2 440 436 - 388 334 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 712 6.52 6.22 7,12 6.52 6,22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 340 733 294 333 695 1236 - - 1209 - - Stage 1 696 656 - 603 583 - - - - - - - Stage 2 596 580 - 636 643 - - - - - - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 301 322 730 224 315 692 1232 - - 1207 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 301 322 - 224 315 - - - - - - - Stage 1 664 651 - 576 557 - - - - - - Stage 2 553 554 - 505 638 - - - - - - - HCM Control Delay,s 20 18.2 0.9 0.1 HCM LOS C C pc'r r ; I e w Capacity(vehlh) 1232 - - 465 299 1207 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - 0.491 0.091 0.005 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 8 0 - 20 18.2 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th%tile 0(veh) 0.1 - - 2.7 0.3 0 - - Z:12019t19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\FY 20211FY 2021 AM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin,Tsutsurni&Associates Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06112/2019 Intersection Ir. vet, 3 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4. 4. 4. 4+ Traffic Vol.veh/h 0 25 15 35 5 65 15 300 160 85 240 5 Future Vol.veh/h 0 25 15 35 5 65 15 300 160 85 240 5 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage.# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade.% 0 - 0 - - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 0 27 16 38 5 71 16 326 174 92 261 5 Majort4Ainor .. Min*r2 M! Conflicting Flow All 932 982 265 915 897 414 267 0 0 501 0 0 Stage 1 449 449 - 446 446 - - - - - - - Stage 2 483 533 - 469 451 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6 22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 247 249 774 253 279 638 1297 - - 1063 - - Stage 1 589 572 - 591 574 - - Stage 2 565 525 - 575 571 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked.% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 196 219 773 204 246 637 1296 - - 1062 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 196 219 - 204 246 - - - - - - - Stage 1 578 513 - 580 563 - - - - - - - Stage 2 489 515 - 479 512 - - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB ) HCM Control Delay s 191 19 8 3 2 2.2 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1296 - - 299 357 1062 - - HCM Lane WC Ratio 0 013 - - 0 145 0.32 0.087 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 7.8 0 - 19.1 19.8 8.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0 - - 0.5 1.4 0.3 - - Z.12019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\FY 20211FY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin Tsutsumi&Associates Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 4: Kapiolani Street & Project Driveway 1 06/1212019 Intersection nt Cela/ siveh 0 4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NET SBT Lane Configurations yr 4 1. Traffic Vol.vehlh 10 10 5 350 355 5 Future Vol.veh/h 10 10 5 350 355 5 Conflicting Pods,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Slop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage.# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade.% 0 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,%2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 11 11 5 380 386 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 779 389 391 0 0 Stage 1 389 - - - - - Stage 2 390 - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5 42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3 518 3.318 2 218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 364 659 1168 - - - Stage 1 685 - - - - - Stage 2 684 - - - - - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 362 659 1168 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 362 - - - - - Stage 1 682 - - - - - Stage 2 684 - - Appa r°` 8 NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 13.1 0 1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1168 - 467 - HCM Lane VIC Ratio 0.005 - 0.047 - HCM Control Delay(s) 8.1 0 13.1 HCM Lane LOS A A B HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 Z12019)19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\FY 20211FY 2021 AM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin,Tsutsumi&Associates Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 5: Kupukupu Street & Project Driveway 2 06/12/2019 Intersection In:Deas s veh 6 Movement WBL 'IBR 'SBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations y 4 Traffic Vol,veh/h 0 10 5 0 5 0 Future Vol,vehth 0 10 5 0 5 0 Conflicting Peds.#lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage.# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.%2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 11 5 0 5 0 Major/Minor Minart , "-Major! Major2 Conflicting Flow All 15 5 0 0 5 0 Stage 1 5 - - - - - Stage 2 10 - - Cntical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5 42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5 42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1004 1078 - - 1616 - Stage 1 1018 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1001 1078 - - 1616 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1001 - - - - - Stage 1 1015 - - - - - Stage 2 1013 - - - - - 01 NB SB HCM Control Delay.s 8.4 0 7.2 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh/h) 1078 1616 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 01 0 003 HCM Control Delay(s) 8.4 7.2 0 HCM Lane LOS A A A HCM 95th%tile O(veh) 0 0 - 212019119-524 Kaiaulu 0 KapiolanitFY 20211FY 2021 AM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 5 ATALf$Tt .TSUT$UMI E.AS90CGATES.iNci F'..r•NrCPIS • RI WVE rOa9 APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS Future Year 2021 PM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/12!2019 Int Delay,slveh 0.4 WBT NPL NBR Lane Configurations j, 4 N Traffic Vol,veh/h 135 5 5 150 5 5 Future Vol,vehfh 135 5 5 150 5 5 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 5 5 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - Veh in Median Storage.# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade.% 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles. % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 147 5 5 163 5 5 Ma nor Majoior+ Conflicting Flow All 0 0 157 0 328 155 Stage 1 155 - Stage 2 173 - Critical Hdwy 4 12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1423 - 666 891 Stage 1 873 - Stage 2 857 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1416 - 660 887 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 660 - Stage 1 865 - Stage 2 857 - Appy HCM Control Delay,s 0 0 2 9 8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity(vetiih) 757 - - 1410 HCM Lane ViC Ratio 0.014 - - 0.00•: HCM Control Delay(s) 9.8 - - 7.6 C HCM Lane LOS A - A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0 Z:12019119-524 Kaiaulu 0 KapiolanAFY 2021\FY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin,Tsutsumi&Associates Page 1 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Int Delay s%veh 5 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ 4+ 4+ Traffic Vol,veh/h 80 5 55 5 10 5 100 240 5 5 245 65 Future Vol.veh/h 80 5 55 5 10 5 100 240 5 5 245 65 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 2 2 0 0 4 0 1 1 0 4 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage.# - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,°'a 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 87 5 60 5 11 5 109 261 5 5 266 71 F .:041i004J1'&?,a M1t4 '?Y11'.skbYak ffiroWAii, _ ,f rit(.'?,. .nE4: .fi,'41 3 i.e., Conflicting Flow All 806 801 308 829 834 265 341 0 0 267 0 0 Stage 1 316 316 - 483 483 - - - - - - - Stage 2 490 485 - 346 351 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4,12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4,018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 300 318 732 290 304 774 1218 - - 1297 - - Stage 1 695 655 - 565 553 - - - - - - - Stage 2 560 552 - 670 632 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 263 281 728 240 269 773 1213 - - 1296 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 263 281 - 240 269 - - - - Stage 1 619 649 - 505 494 - - - - - - Stage 2 486 493 - 606 626 - - - - - - Approach EB WB AtNB MEI< HCM Control Delay.s 22.8 17 5 4 01 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/MajorMvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1213 - - 352 310 1296 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.09 -0 432 0.07 0.004 - HCM Control Delay(s) 8.3 0 - 22.8 17.5 7.8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 2.1 0.2 0 - - Z\2019',19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\FY 20211FY 2021 PM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin,Tsutsumi&Associates Page 2 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 0612)2019 Int Decay.siveh 8.2 Moveme ;_ NMISR WBL WBT WBR NBL NET NBR SBL SET SBR Lane Configurations 4. 4., 4+ Traffic Vol,vehfh 5 25 5 95 35 85 5 220 55 65 310 5 Future Vol,vehih 5 25 5 95 35 85 5 220 55 65 310 5 Conflicting Peds,#lhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length Veh in Median Storage # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade.% 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.% 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 5 27 5 103 38 92 5 239 60 71 337 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minorl Majort Conflicting Flow All 826 792 340 778 764 270 342 0 0 300 0 0 Stage 1 482 482 - 280 280 - - - - Stage 2 344 310 - 498 484 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6 52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6 12 5 52 - - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 - - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4 018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 291 322 702 314 334 769 1217 - - 1261 - - Stage 1 565 553 - 727 679 - - - - - - - Stage 2 671 659 - 554 552 - - - - - - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 219 298 702 273 309 768 1217 - - 1260 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 219 298 - 273 309 - - - - - - - Stage 1 562 514 - 723 675 - - - - - - - Stage 2 554 655 - 484 513 - - - - - - - WE NB SB HCM Control Delay,s 18.4 29 1 0 1 1 2. HCM LOS C D Minor Lane!Major Mvmt NEL NBT NER EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SET SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1217 327 376 1260 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0 004 - - 0.124 0 622 0 056 - HCM Control Delay(s) 8 0 - 18.4 29.1 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C D A A HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 4 4 0.2 - - 2:\2019119-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\FY 20211FY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin,Tsutsumi&Associates Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 4: Kapiolani Street & Project Driveway 1 06/12/2019 Int Delay,*eh 0,4 Lane Configurations '* 4 Is Traffic Vol.veh/h 5 10 10 325 325 10 Future Vol veh/h 5 10 10 325 325 10 Conflicting Peds,#/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - - 0 0 - Grade.% 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,%2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 5 11 11 353 353 11 xv_ Conflicting Flow Ag 734 359 364 0 - 0 Stage 1 359 - - - - - Stage 2 375 - - Cri6cal Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Crit;cal Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 387 685 1195 - - - Stage 1 707 - - - - - Stage 2 695 - - - - - Platoon blocked,% Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 383 685 1195 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 383 - - - - - Stage 1 699 - - - - - Stage 2 695 - - - - - HCM Control Delay.s 11.8 0 2 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NET EBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity(veh/h) 1195 - 542 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - 0.03 - - HCM Control Delay(s) 8 0 11.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 Z.2019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 PM syn Synchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 4 HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Apartments 5: Kupukupu Street & Project Driveway 2 06/12/2019 intersection rt Delay srveh Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lare Configurations se" j. 4 Traffic Vol.veh/h 0 0 0 10 5 Future Vol.veh/h 0 5 0 0 10 5 Conflicting Peds,#!hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized None - None - None Storage Length 0 - - - - - Veh in Median Storage,# 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade.% 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles.%2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 5 0 0 11 5 Major/Minor M.r1 a art h;!ajor' Conflicting Flow All 27 0 0 0 0 0 Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 27 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4 12 - Critical Hdvry Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 988 - - - - - Stage 1 Stage 2 996 - - - - - Platoon blocked.°% May Cap-1 Maneuver 988 - - - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 988 - - - - - Stage 1 Stage 2 996 - - - - - Approach WB NB SES'. HCM Control Delay,s 0 HCM LOS Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity(veh(h) HCM Lane VIC Ratio HCM Control Delay(s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th%tile Q(veh) Z:12019\19-524 Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani\FY 20211FY 2021 PM syn Syrchro 10 Report Austin.Tsutsumi&Associates Page 5 Or • CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE P.O.Box 686 HILo,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.935.7975 WWW.CARLSMTTH.COM SLIMOCARLSMITH.COM October 26, 2009 Alan Okamoto, Esq. Ali Q P NICE KG Nakamoto, Okamoto & Yamamoto yOatta 187 Kapiolani Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Re: Richard Paiva Kukuau 1st, District of South Hilo Tax Map Key Nos.: (3)2-4-025:059 Dear Mr. Okamoto: This letter confirms the understanding of the parties relating to Mr. Boschetti's Boschetti") agreement to grant a 10-foot wide perpetual, non-exclusive access and utility easement over Boschetti's property at TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080 ("Parcel 80") in favor of Mr. Paiva's ("Paiva")property at TMK: (3) 2-4-025:59 ("Parcel 59"),preconditioned upon final approval of the Change of Zone Application No. REZ 09-000103 ("REZ application") with conditions of approval acceptable to Boschetti in his sole discretion, subject to the following terms: 1. Boschetti hereby grants to Paiva a temporary right-of-entry over Parcel 80 to access Parcel 59 along the existing driveway to Parcel 59. Paiva, his successors and assigns shall have no claim, title to, or right of possession of any portion of Parcel 80 as a result of the temporary right-of-entry over Parcel 80 to access Parcel 59. 2. Boschetti shall grant to Paiva a 10-foot wide perpetual, non-exclusive access and utility easement ("Easement") over Parcel 80 in favor of Parcel 59. The location of the Easement shall be determined pursuant to the design selected by Boschetti within the area generally depicted on Exhibit 1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The preparation of the survey, the processing of the Land Court Petition to Designation Easement, recordation of the Grant of Access and Utility Easement with the Land Court, and any other requirement to implement shall be at the sole cost and expense of Paiva. Boschetti shall consent to and join in the Land Court Petition for Designation of Easement. HONOLULU • KAPOLEI HILO • KONA • MAUI GUAM SAIPAN • LOS ANGELES Exhibit 6 r Richard Paiva October 26, 2009 Page 2 3. The location and improvements for the Easement will be pursuant to, and subject to the final Project design and infrastructure improvements required by the County of Hawaii for the development proposed in the pending REZ application. 4. Paiva shall not interfere with Boschetti and his successors and assigns use of Parcel 80, shall at all times use due care for public safety, and that with the exception of Boschetti's willful acts or gross negligence, Paiva agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Boschetti, his agents, employees and any person acting for and on behalf of him, from and against all claims or demands for loss, liability, or damage, including claims for property damage, personal injury, bodily injury or death, arising out of or resulting from Paiva's use of the Parcel 80 to access Parcel 59. 5. Paiva shall inform the Windward Planning Commission and Hawaii County Council in writing that he has no objections to the pending REZ application. If Mr. Paiva is agreeable with the foregoing conditions, please obtain his signature as indicated below. Please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have any questions or require additional information. Thank you for your consideration. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, Steven im AGREED AND ACCEPTED: By: Richard Paiva Dated: Hilo, Hawaii, SSL/KYL xc: Client Greg Gadd 4830-0699-0084.1 1 foi p t cI 1--- l POOL 1 rl PAIVA 1 L1 PARCEL 59IIIA 1 W POOL HOUSEc I dwE.= i -, i BLDG. G itt W LAi( BLDG. F On t oE. 3_-_.7.7 r1C4 1 1 E- I EEA T- T`t z BLDG. c NEIGHBQRINC PROPER H I<I ZONING: RS - 7.5 (S; E Y Bimcip d W i i BLDG. An- REA. i i IliC1 )o BUILDING A', 5,980 SQ.FTilk-BUILDING B=N.8 SQ.FT i 1 BUILDING C=13,53\ ,SQ FT t es D BUILDING E=21,688 ST t BUILDING F=14,160 SQ.FT. 1 IBUILDINGG= 800 SO.FTVIr TOTAL 93,964 SQ.FT ILDING A=1,888l2= 944 SQ.F7. N OS Iii IiIII _,ILDINGB=5,976/2= 2,988 S .FT ILDING C=3,564/2= 1,782 SQ FT. PARCEL 80 ti SDG BILDINGD=4,328/2= 2,164 SQ.FT ILDING E=5,976/2= 2,988 SQ.FT ILDING F=3,752/2= 1.876 SO FT.PARCEL 80 TAL 12,742 SQ.FT.28,083 SQUARE I-EEI \ AND TOTAL 106,706 SQ.F'I.0.6447 ACRES STUDIO=709 SQ.FT. ONE BEDROOM=877 SQ.FT. TWO BEDROOM=1,311 SQ.FT PARCEL 48 165,702 SQUARE FEET 3.804 ACRES BOSCHETTI APARTMENTS SITE PLAN Sl AI E 1/32'-1' f CARLSMITH BALL LLP 01:43 jlAA LIXIITEU LIABILITI LAw PARTVEKS1nr1 `:w 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE P.O.Box 686 E10.o,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.935.7975 WWW.CARLSMITH.COM KGARSON C:ARLSMITH COM October 20, 2020 Michael Yee Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Christian Kay Re: Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 Time Extension and Amendments to Conditions Owner: Giampaolo "Paul" Boschetti Applicant: Ikaika Ohana, a Hawaii non-profit corporation TMK Nos.: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 (collectively the "Project") Dear Mr. Yee: Enclosed please find the Applicant's Revised Project Site Plan which continues to propose a 64-unit multiple-family affordable rental housing apartment complex,but has been revised to maximize flexibility and to reflect a balance of uses, including structures, parking. paths of travel, open spaces, amenities and livability in keeping with similar affordable housing projects within Hawaii County. Sincerely, Katherine A. Garson KAG:KYL xc with enclosure: Client lkaika Ohana, LLC 4827-6809-4159.1 1 : 6912 Ho,oLuLU HILO KONA f'i I Planning Dept. Exhibit y and,usESBtiCc rl izrN Ill01111S000V Y3a 0 lh i Ill S iueioidex p ninrn N F %f- i QPc_ q° ' i 1 loa=i;( 1 xe 6i \ i 6 4 ill, ig I 1 rc1111 11 m 0' R Yd ..7,tll« r€ ii m SSS7Zm11H„ 12 a ,3 w 4? nn Y 1 ~le s 7 l =ice .. , 7 v.L ., immen. %Iiingsmil 1__, I E n cz! 74:]-,-7 Itp acji -'-.--- . 1 MI ti 7 L4------ --:_-__, r "° i, gm NI min — 1 1, IN I a. j 711ii_ t-____[ Li-- 2 1 i,v 1 t D I i 1 . _ HIT1 I I I ' - O CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LUNLITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE P.O.Box 686 11tto,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.93.5 7975 WWW.CARLSMITH COM KGARSONetCARCSMITH.COM October 22, 2020 Michael Yee Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Christian Kay Re: Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 Time Extension and Amendments to Conditions Owner: Giampaolo "Paul" Boschetti Applicant: lkaika Ohana, a Hawaii non-profit corporation TMK Nos.: (3)2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 (collectively the "Project") Dear Mr. Yee: On behalf of the Applicant, this will inform the Planning Department that the Applicant is withdrawing its request to amend the parking requirement contained in Condition E of Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32. Please note that the Applicant is still seeking a time extension to complete construction. Thus, Applicant's request is revised as follows: E Construction ofthe proposed development shall be completed within five 5)yearsfrom the effective date ofthis ordinance, as amended. Prior to construction, the applicant successors or assigns shall secure. Final Plan Approvalfor the proposed development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section 25-2-70, chapter 25 (Zoning Code). Plans shall identify all existing and/or proposed structures,paved driveway accesses and parking stalls associated with the proposed development. The applicant shall develop parking spaces associated with the proposed development in accordance with the required parking spaces pursuant to Sections 25-4-51 and 25-4-52, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code). Hawaii County Code. In addition, the applicant shall develop additional parking spaces up to a maximum of 60%ofthe required spacesfor the total residential units to be built within the proposed development. Landscaping shall also be indicated on the plansfor the purpose ofmitigating any adverse noise or visual impacts to adjacent properties in accordance with the requirements of Planning Department's Rule No. 17(Landscaping Requirements). HoNOtULU Hlto KONA MAUI 137044PlanningDept. Exhibit 3 Michael Yee October 22, 2020 Page 2 Please contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have any questions. Thank you. Sincerely, KatherGarson KAG:KYL xc: Client kaika Ohana LLC 4830-8681.2k79 2 C.- v CARLSMITH BALL LLP sZ pZ A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP C SS Z I~-- o n 4. O r 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE O« p P.O.Box 686 q mVN+' q= D ti,l HILO,HAWAII 96721-0686 C O TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.935.7975 s WWW.CARLSMITH.COM w KGARSON@C ARLSMITH.COM October 1, 2020 VIA HAND DELIVERY Michael Yee Planning Director Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Christian Kay Re: Owner: Giampaolo "Paul" Boschetti Applicant: Ikaika Ohana, a Hawaii non-profit corporation Request:Time Extension Request(Condition E)and Amendment to Conditions E, G, J, P and R of Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32TaxMapKeyNos.: (3)2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 Dear Mr. Yee: On September 3, 2020, Applicant submitted the subject time extension and amendment request of Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 and stated that ASM Affiliates ("ASM") would be conducting a field inspection of TMK: (3) 2-4-025:80 ("Parcel 80") to determine whether an AIS was required or a field inspection letter report would be sufficient to obtain a "no historic properties affected" determination letter for Parcel 80. Attached for your transmittal to SHPD is a copy of ASM's letter dated September 29, 2020, which supports a "no historic properties affected" determination letter for Parcel 80. Please feel free to contact me or my paralegal Katherine Luga should you have any questions concerning this submittal. Very truly yours, Katherine A. GarsonKAG/KYL Enclosures xc with enclosures: Client 4850-8057-5181.1 I HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUII'' Planning Dept. Exhibit ASMrOil affiliates id, '4,1 Archaeology•History•Ethnography•Architectural History ASM Project 35650.00 September 29,2020 Susan Lebo,Ph.D. Archaeology Branch Chief DLNR-SHPD 601 Kamokila Blvd.,Rm.555 Kapolei, Hawaii 96707 Email: Susan.A.Lebo@hawaii.govhawaii.gov via email Subject: Archaeological Field Inspection of TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080, Kukuau 1st, South Hilo, Hawaii. Dear Susan: On behalf of Giampaolo Boschetti(landowner),ASM Affiliates(ASM)conducted an archaeological field inspection of Tax Map Key (TMK) parcel (3) 2-4-025:080, located in Kukuau 1st Ahupua`a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai`i(Figures 1,2,and 3). The current field inspection was conducted in support of a time extension for a rezoning application. The purpose of the field inspection was to determine whether unidentified historic properties exist on the subject parcel. As defined by Hawai`i Revised Statutes Chapter 6E-2,a historic property is defined as any building,structure, object,district,area, or site, including heiau and underwater site, which is over fifty years old. This letter report presents a description of the subject parcel, a summary of previous archaeological studies and historical research in the immediate vicinity of the subject parcel, a description of the field inspection methods and results, and our conclusions and recommendations with respect to likely future historic preservation requirements for the development of the parcel. Description of the Subject Parcel The 28,084 square-foot subject parcel is located in a developed portion of Hilo,at an elevation of 120 feet above sea level just mauka (uphill)of the intersection of Kapi`olani Street and Kukuau Street(see Figure 1). It is bounded on the north by Kukuau Street and on all other sides by a mix of developed and undeveloped residential parcels. The 40-foot wide parcel is currently used as a privately-owned, paved access road(Figures 4 and 5). Soils in the study area are mapped as Keaukaha extremely rocky muck(rKFD), a dark brown and strongly acidic soil that possesses rapid permeability,moderate runoff,and a slight erosion hazard(Sato et al. 1973). This soil has developed overpahoehoe lava flows that originated from Mauna Loa Volcano approximately 750 to 1,500 years ago (Sherrod et al. 2007). As observed during the current field inspection, thin accumulations of this soil are located on the unpaved portions of the parcel. Vegetation on the sides of the paved access road is characterized by a mix of exotic trees (Figure 6) that includes mango (Mangifera indica), African tulip tree (Spathodea campanulata), banyan (Ficus microcarpa), avocado (Persea americano),ti(Cordvlinefruticosa),ha/a(Pandanus tectorius),and Java plum(Syzygium cumini).Ground cover(Figure 7)consists primarily of ferns, grasses, and vines such as wedelia(Wedelia trilobata),maile pilau(Paederia foetida), California grass(Brachiaria mutica),thorny wait-a-bit(Caesalpina decapetala), and philodendron (PhilodendronsP•)• The existing vegetation pattern indicates that the subject parcel has undergone substantial alteration in the past including but not limited to mechanized clearing and earth moving. 820 Mddani Street,Suite 700,Honolulu,Hawaii 96813 (808)439-8089 Fax:(808)439-8087 507A East Lanikaula Street,Hilo,Hawaii 96720 (808)969-6066 Fax:(808)443-0065 www.asmaffiliates.com September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau FI Page 2 of 13 Brief culture-historical context For a more in-depth historical background the reader is referred to Kelly et al.(1981);Maly(1996a, 1996b); McEldowney(1979); Moniz(1994).The earliest historical knowledge of Hilo comes from legends written by (Kamakau 1961) of a 16th century chief Umi-a-Liloa (son of Liloa) who at that time ruled the entire island of Hawai`i. Descendants of Umi and his sister-wife were referred to as "Kona"chiefs, controlling Keil, Kona, and Kohala, while descendants of`Umi and his Maui wife were "Hilo" chiefs, controlling Hamakua,Hilo,and Puna(Kelly et al. 1981).According to(Kamakau 1961)both sides fought over control of the island,desiring access to resources such as feathers,mamaki tapa,and canoes on the Hilo side; and wauke tapa, and warm lands and waters on the Kona side (c.f. Kelly et al. 1981). The subject parcel is located in an area defined by McEldowney(1979) as the Upland Agricultural Zone (Zone II). Prior to the expansion of grazing and sugarcane cultivation in the late nineteenth century, this zone would have contained unwooded grasslands extending up to 1,500 feet elevation, where house lots, garden plots, and small groves of economically beneficial trees were located.Kamehameha I lived for a time in the Hilo area where he built many of his large war, and upon his death, gave Kukuau 1st Ahupua'a to his trusted haole advisor John Young(Kelly et al. 1981:11). Historical accounts compiled by McEldowney(1979) indicate that much of the area above Hilo, including the vicinity of the subject parcel, was in a zone of agricultural productivity. As Isabella Bird (1875:54) recorded upon arriving in Hilo in 1873:"Above Hilo,broad lands sweeping up cloudwards,with their sugar cane, kalo, melons, pineapples, and banana groves suggest the boundless liberality of Nature. Handy and Handy(1972:539)also describe the general region as an agricultural area: On the lava strewn plain of Waiakea and on the slopes between Waiakea and Wailuku River, dry taro was formerly planted wherever there was enough soil.There were forest plantations in Panaewa and in all the lower fern-forest zone above Hilo town along the course of the Wailuku River. During the Mahele of 1848,the ahupua'a of Kukuau 15t was given to John Young's son Keoni Ana(Buke Mahele 1848). Under the "Enabling" or "Kuleana Act" of 1849, thirteen Land Commission Awards LCAw.) parcels were awarded in Kukuau 1st (OHA 2018). One of these was LCAw. 8515 for Keone Ana's lands in Kaki-mu 1st.The others were smaller parcels awarded for house lots and cultivated sections. Two awards were located immediately south of the subject parcel, while the rest were located makai seaward)near what is now Mo`oheau Park.. Land Commission Award(LCAw.)2663 to Kahue is located adjacent to the southern end of the subject parcel LCAw. 2402 to Keaniho is located immediately to the south of Kahue's. Testimony taken for these two kuleana claims quoted by Nelson et al. (2006) indicate that LCAw.2663 contained a house lot and garden plots,and that the land around these two kuleana parcels contained a mix of cultivated kihapai (garden plots) of dryland kalo (taro) and wasteland. The subject parcel, however, was not included in any awarded kuleana parcels. The period of development between 1870s and 1890s saw the rapid change in Hilo town and growth of the sugar industry (Maly 1996b). The Waiakea Mill Company, whose land holdings included portions of Kukuau, operated from 1897 through 1946, and was one of the largest sugar companies to operate in Hilo (Dorrance and Morgan 2000). Commercial sugar production lasted in Kukuau until the mid-twentieth century,at which time many of the fields were converted to pasturage associated with cattle ranching. An oral history interview conducted for the Nelson et al. (2006) study provided information about a few wooden residences that had fronted Kapi`olani Street makai of the subject parcel during the early-to mid-twentieth century. Prior archaeological studies A portion of the subject parcel was included in a prior Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) that examined a drainage ditch and several parcels as shown in Figure 8(Nelson et al. 2006).As a result of the Nelson et al. (2006)AIS, one historic property was recorded on a nearby parcel (TMK: (3)-2-4-025:048). The site (SIHP Site 50-10-35-25547) is a stone enclosure built within a raised bedrock crack formation. Site 25547 was evaluated to be historically significant under Criterion d for the information it yielded regarding early twentieth century land use in the area. In their acceptance letter for the AIS report,DLNR- September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau Fl Page 3 of 13 SHPD agreed that no further historic preservation work is required for that site(Log No. 2006.3257, Doc. No,.0609JT83).No historic properties were identified in the portion ofthe subject parcel that was examined during that study The results of other prior archaeological studies in the vicinity of the subject parcel(Clark et al.2012;Hunt and McDermott 1993; Robins et al. 1996) suggest that nineteenth and twentieth century mechanized cultivation likely impacted older archaeological sites or features that may have been present. As a result of these impacts, the surrounding area is characterized by more recent agriculture-related sites or ancillary habitation sites with few intact older sites visible on the ground surface. The pahoehoe lava flows in this portion of South Hilo,however, may contain lava blisters and tubes. During archaeological monitoring of the Kapi`olani Street extension(Nelson et al.2017),a Precontact-era burial in a concealed lava blister was inadvertently discovered and ultimately preserved in place. Although located 1.4 kilometers from the subject parcel,that concealed burial serves as a reminder that lava tubes and blisters in this area may contain traditional Hawaiian burials or other evidence of human use. Field inspection methods and results On September 3, 2020, Johnny Dudoit, B.A., under the direction of Benjamin Barna, Ph.D. (Principal Investigator)conducted an archaeological surface inspection of the entire subject parcel(100%coverage). At the time of the field inspection,the boundaries of the subject parcel were marked with flagging(Figure 9). Ground surface visibility within the driveway was excellent (see Figure 5). The vegetation cover is generally fairly thick beyond the driveway and near the drainage channel (Figures 10 and 11);however, it was possible to walk the entire parcel and adequately inspect the ground surface in the vegetated areas. No lava blisters or historic properties of any kind were observed on the subject parcel. Conclusion and Recommendations Because no historic properties were observed, it is the conclusion of this report that the rezoning of the subject parcel will have no effect on historic properties. With respect to historic preservation review of the proposed reasoning, under Hawai`i Revised Statutes Chapter 6E, a determination of effect of"no historic properties affected"is recommended. Additionally,based on these results,a determination of effect of"no historic properties affected"is also recommended for future development of the parcel. Should you have any question or concerns,please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Sincerely, Benjamin Barna,Ph.D. Senior Archaeologist September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau Fl Page 4 of 13 References Cited Bird,I. 1875 The Hawaiian Archipelago: Six Months among the Palm Groves, Coral Reefs, & Volcanoes ofthe Sandwich Islands.John Murray,London. Buke Mahele 1848 Buke Kakau Paa no ka mahele aina i Hooholoia iwaena o Kamehameha III a me Na Lii a me Na Konohiki ana,Hale Alii,Honolulu. Clark,M. R.,J.D. Nelson,and R. B.Rechtman 2012 An Archaeological Inventory Surveyfor the Proposed Kapi'olani Street Extension Project TMKs: 3-2-4-01:181, 182, and 3-2-4-56.•029), Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i. Rechtman Consulting, LLC Report RC-0770. Prepared for Geometrician Associates,LLC,Hilo,HI. Dorrance,W., and F.Morgan 2000 Sugar Islands: The 165-Year Story ofSugar in Hawaii.Mutual Publishing,Honolulu. Handy,E. S.C.,and E.G. Handy 1972 Native Planters in Old Hawaii: Their Life, Lore, and Environment. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233.Bishop Museum Press,Honolulu. Hunt,T.,and M. McDermott 1993 Archaeological Inventory Survey, Pu'ainako Street Extension Project, Lans of Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2, and Ponahawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hmvai'. Prepared for Okahara&Associates,Hilo. Kamakau, S.M. 1961 Ruling Chiefs ofHawaii. Kamehameha Schools Press, Honolulu. Kelly,M., B.Nakamura,and D. Barrere 1981 Hilo Bay:A Chronological History, Land and Water Use In The Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawaii. Department of Anthropology, Bernice P. Bishop Museum Contract No. DACW84-80-C-0015. Prepared for U.S. Army Engineer District,Honolulu. Maly,K. 1996a Appendix In:Archaeological Assessment Study Hilo Judiciary Complex Project, Lands of Wainaku, Ponohawai, Pi'ihonua, and Waiakea, South Hilo District, Island ofHawaii TMK: 2-6-15:1,2; 2-6-16:2; 2-4-49:18,19; 2-2-15:33; 2-4-1:12). Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D.,Inc. 1721-061496. Prepared for State ofHawaii,Honolulu. I 996b Historical Documentary Research and Oral History Interviews: Waiakea Cane Lots (12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20 &20-A), Land of Waiakea, District of South Hilo, Island of Hawaii. Kumu Pono Associates W01-0795 (III). Prepared for UHH Ho`oikaika Club, Hilo,HI. McEldowney,H. 1979 Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design:Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo, Hawaii. Department of Anthropology,B.P.Bishop Museum.Prepared for the U.S.Army Engineer Division,Pacific Ocean. Moniz,J.J. 1994 Historical and Archaeological Synthesis of Land Use and Settlement Patterns, Waiakea Ahupua`a,Hilo,Hawaii.Manuscript onfile at DLNR-SHPD Hilo Office. September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau Fl Page 5 of 13 Nelson,J. D.,M.R. Clark,and R. B. Rechtman 2006 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment of the Proposed Mohouli Drainage Project (TMKs: 3-2-4-25:48, 50, 52, 53, 59 por., 67 por., 78 por., 93, 106por, 107por., 108por., 109., 110 por., 115 por.,and 126 por.). Rechtman Consulting, LLC Report RC-0342. Prepared for SSFM International,Inc.,Honolulu. Nelson,J. D.,T. Gotay,and R. B. Rechtman 2017 Archaeological Monitoring Reportfor Kapi'olani Street Extension Project TMKs: (3)2-4- 001:019(por.), 024(por.), 120(por.), 167(por.), 179(por), 181, 182, and 183(por.); (3) 2-4-023: 022 (por). and 023 (por.); (3) 2-4-028:014(por.) and 032 (por.), 022 (por), 028 por.), 029, and 030 (por.); and (3) 2-4-057:024 (por.), Waiakea Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island ofHawaii. ASM Affiliates Project Number 24130. Prepared for SSFM Internation,Inc.,Hilo,HI. OHA(Office of Hawaiian Affairs) 2018 Kipuka Database.Electronic document,http://kipukadatabase.com/kipuka. Robins,J., W. Fortini,and R. Spear 1996 An Archaeological Inventory Survey ofthe Proposed Mohouli Connector Road,Ahupua'a of Kukuau 1 and 2, Ponahawai, and Punahoa, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. Scientific Consultant Services,Inc.Report SCS-085-2. Prepared for Youngki Hahn,Ph.D. Sato,H. H.,W. Ikeda,R. Paeth,R. Smythe,and M.Takahiro,Jr. 1973 Soil Survey ofthe Island ofHawaii, State ofHawaii. U.S. Department ofAgriculture,Soil Conservation Service and University of Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station, Washington,D.C. Sherrod, D.,J. Sinton, S.Watkins,and K. Brunt 2007 Geologic Map of the State of Hawaii. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey.Open-File Report 2007-1089.Electronic document, http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2007/1089,accessed Apr 27,2018. September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau FI Page 6 of 13 4.26HI500 2)IDo) 1.°.:1,; 34, J I Ia110440 r. v N c 0 125 250 500 Meters t,.:,411,ai_I A Mtbh:Z.Chester SiItP BAYFqoNr flown E Clem Sall 4,,.Fr,gM,,,,4 r SA' Holt; a 1 c!ndian Ali• It;:VE trtaro 5/ o6. tr xn re,,,, o sA Hilo `A'' a IHin<t}Ye ,'-` alt i., Maunas r`ti . loo Sch v a Th r, II e.--y.. O o II JtiS s F` r 1 x rt ,k:ar.a PJ P rO=3*" a HAWAII COUNTY y 1ti t ,'loSel)n HS S`161OI'1'tytaGt+*ii: 7 A4 IF a I x 7 14.P.F, F.,,, t3 LF tit'''. U, a t; t L. R F S, 7 0 N i x Is 1 r., 'RqOyitAWAttCOUNTY N 4'; r Y. I hfikatla ch f, JAYllr ut,.,app Portion of USGS 7.5'Quadrangle tub III 2020 D Subject parcel r i I I22505002K100026151)1 2821))2 Figure 1. Subject parcel location. September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kfiktiau Fl Page 7 of 13 7.7.-______I__::'!_t'L''7 .,_•_-1‘ -li; i\ 1. ,• V,s-.. . s.' 2, le 0 ,, , . 1‘,v1::\\•. \--\ 2 0 .4X ti!'1i -. 1:Iiti'NatvriIt-.,,1/p1t • 1,...'t) I IN .. "A \ i •14,,, I 2 .7. 11k _0v1.. Is., a 2 t 00•-In7p Ge 1 1 I VI. 1 4 1. .i• t ''t 1,c lt \i 1. 1 ; . ......' - lis` ‘ , ., 4. `Is-:." ' 1 I --'r ,.....1 1s It ti 'ti 11 ,1 „!•,!,I r I 1 • -. r- •, ..),\ • I 1 1., r 1 ti 1 tt:l•t. t I t I) r1/4•11 :ilill 0 1 tt It ilf• I ®I t 1 ri 1! Dor_sig. a 1. 1 i I 3 ci 1 .... 22i2A 2 74 I • to j.!I 1 •Zrrcle'lli - ',dig; 1 ,;t iti 1 .'1 l 1,t11ft1 ••••••,. '",tet _ la r , !..t -,i.I.C .....*4Cd,.. 1 •14',It 1', ,..c.1 Rt al tt11 .11 i. ..,:. e."- 14411A. • 4 .;.,1. /..?:::, ' 4 i 0V.r 0 1 Sol ' ....., trtc•A 1 4 9 xi 2 rilkr.),19111,,Tatalt'i\& 0!I .• .' iel i1 .-7 -- 7,,,,,,, 0 ,. • _ E 1 tu 4r 1 : IroeS Xlir ! r 1 cis S.ra s i.... rsi ct..sw..,riari.2PI A.4•A"....:r..., 1..)1-4 tOi4: September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau Ft Page 8 of 13 N oso d11 Y Subject parcel Figure 3. Recent satellite photograph of the subject parcel. September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau Fl Page 9 of 13 h v t ' t• mac s.i._r a• a. t k st f { A i Rf' r 4'il F.. z i r0' t 0.‘ 4 Orek, Figure 4. Subject parcel viewed from Kukuau Street,view to the southeast. y a 4jrt #. p7.Y t'.I h. tw t r A r, r, I A 35 alar Figure 5. Paved access road extending through the subject parcel,view to the northwest. September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau FI Page 10 of 13 4 4 eR 4 .. Lry tiret,:': I;411 i F 1\ s, ti_ Figure 6.Typical vegetation on the unpaved portion ofthe parcel,view to the northwest. r1` IA: `'' 4 + may w .. • .! 4'4~ x• 16t'''' ye rr 14' '4"4 lAs n t. j ij OP A ..::C.4.' '* ' V'' '..‘ / . 1 4 , - Att. - 4 .11:,4 -, -, 4e.i... w t7 c iii r 1 1r i rte- . dik Q AF"F ..,.6 T.. Figure 7.Ground cover in the unpaved portions of the subject parcel,view to the east. September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau Fl Page II of 13 i i II Subject parcel p3 Nelson et al.2006 project areati I i Edge of raised i r bedrock formation 1 t i i i TMK parcel F.,_.._..I i boundaries i i i i i i i N__.—'t 1. t 0 20 40 I l Scale in meters 0t:. ililwt LCAw.2663 k ;' 'i 25547''d: to Site 4, „, to! es,G 9- u i t u\ ` t \\\ N.. t 1 true i \\ 1\ t t Kapiolani Street Area of historic habitation features Police Station Figure 8. Site location map from Nelson et al.(2006)with the subject parcel shaded red. September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti Kukuau FI Page 12 of 13 t_.1• .1 ti vii 1" 4, i'. .' ';- ! 1 q 4 tiK.117,• - 4s r fir/ 4r fi .: • Y f- k(s F ,-1 : rt r s 5 ,*. 4...1 ,' p,I. i+ ',-. • • • -., m - x I7v- Figure 9.Survey flagging marking the parcel boundary,view to the west. r ttr Itit,e tFr* XA, yYt r' j F , i 7R ai . fith v V 4 f t• V7 f ..,, em; - s ' s tr 4 .r 5 ..r $ r„`yE .. .'Qiy t y P'..i. . , ? t v A .. 4.' _r. f..`/:- . Figure 10. Typical thick vegetation in unpaved portions of the subject parcel,view to the southeast. September 29,2020 ASM Boschetti KOkuau Fl Page 13 of 13 k 1 'i= 1i; 1:: . Ai.,,„ '44 talt f li 1 414 9 3 7 I , • .,• F• ti Figure 11. Vegetation near drainage channel in the subject parcel,view to the southeast. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF HAWAII HILO, HAWAII DATE: October 13. 2020 neotentiAliaat CUR PLANNING DEPT OCT 13 2020 c2 12 TO: Michael Yee, Planning Director REC'D HAND DELIVERED FROM: t Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Ar SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION (REZ 09-000103) Request: Amendment to Conditions E, G. J, P, and R Applicant: Ikaika Ohana (formally Giampaolo Paul Boschetti) TM K: 2-4-025:048, 053. 080 We have reviewed the subject application forwarded by your memo dated September 22, 2020 and offer the following comments for your consideration: 1. We have no objections the amendment requests to Conditions E, G, P, and R. 2. Regarding the amendment request to Condition J, it should be noted that the construction plans will still be subject to review by the Department of Public Works (DPW). which includes, but not limited to streetlight and traffic control device requirements. Until construction plans are submitted with the locations of driveways. DPW will not be able to determine streetlight and traffic control requirements. Questions may be referred to Bryce Harada at 961-8042. Planning Dept. County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 136840 Exhibit 5 rt:a.e, DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY • COUNTY OF HAWAII d 345 KEKUANAO'A STREET, SUITE 20 • HILO, HAWAII 96720tT. 1`.. TELEPHONE (808)961-8050 • FAX (808) 961-8657 October 12, 2020 Mr. Ross S. Okuda Mechanical Enterprises, Inc. 501 Sumner Street, Suite 503 Honolulu, HI 96817 Dear Mr. Okuda: Subject: Water Demand Calculations for Change of Zone Application (REZ 09-000103) Applicant- Boschetti,Giampaolo"Paul" Kaiaulu 0 Kapi`olani" Tax Map Key 2-4-025-048,053 and 080 We have reviewed the water demand calculations for the proposed 64-unit housing development and find them acceptable. Based on the calculations provided,the estimated average daily water demand for the project is 29,600 gallons per day(GPD), or 74 equivalent units of water at 400 GPD per unit, and the peak flow is estimated at 174 gallons per minute. A 3-inch meter with a 4-inch service lateral will be required. In accordance with the Department's current water availability conditions, which are subject to change without notice,water can be made available from an existing 8-inch waterline within Kapi`olani Street fronting Parcel No. 53, and from an existing 6-inch waterline within KUkUau Street fronting Parcel No. 80, for the proposed 64 dwelling unit housing project. There are no existing services to the subject parcels. Please note that the water commitment for the subject application expired on January 31, 2016. Although the water commitment has expired,water can still be made available at this time for the subject application. To effect a water commitment time extension for 73 units of water until January 31,2021,a water commitment deposit of$55,500.00= [(73 units) x ($150.00 annual deposit per unit) x(5 years)] must be received by this office as soon as possible. Prior to granting water service to the subject development, the applicant/developer will be required to comply with the following conditions: 1. Construct necessary water system improvements, which shall include, but not be limited to: a. installation of a 4-inch service lateral to accommodate a 3-inch meter, Planning Dept.Water, Our JKost Precious*source. . . xa WaiA Kane. . .13 6 8 26 Exhibit The Department ofWater Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer. Mr. Ross S. Okuda Page 2 October12, 2020 b. installation of a detector check meter for on-site fire protection use, c. installation of a reduced pressure type backflow prevention assembly within five(5) feet of the meter on private property,the installation of which must be inspected and approved by the Department before water service can be activated,and d. subject to other agencies' requirements to construct improvements within the road right-of-way fronting the property affected by the proposed development,the applicant shall be responsible for the relocation and adjustment of the Department's affected water system facilities, should they be necessary. Submit construction plans, prepared by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii, for review and approval. 2. Remit the prevailing facilities charge, which is subject to change,as shown below: FACILITIES CHARGE(FC): 1"service 1,190.00 73 additional units @ $5,500.00/unit 401,500.00 Total FC 402,690.00 WATER COMMITMENT DEPOSIT CREDIT(WCD): 97 additional units @ $150.00/unit paid three(3) times 43,650.00) Total Amount 359,040.00 These are due and payable upon completion of the installation of the required water system improvements and prior to water service being granted. For your information, water commitment deposits are credited towards the final facilities requirement for the development. Note that the amount of water commitment deposit may exceed the prevailing facilities charge amount; for example, when requests for time extensions continue and are approved. Until the development is finally completed, these are separate and unrelated items. In the event that water commitment deposits exceed the facilities charge, no refunds are applicable. 3. Should it be necessary, submit the appropriate documents, properly prepared and executed,to convey the water system improvements and necessary easements to the Water Board of the County ofHawai`i prior to final subdivision approval being granted. A registered land surveyor shall stamp and certify the metes and bounds description within the conveyance documents. However, prior to water meter services being granted to the development,the conveyance documents shall be accepted by the Water Board. Mr. Ross S. Okuda Page 3 October 12, 2020 Should there be any questions,please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961-8070,extension 256. Sincerely yours, VAM1A4° Keith K. Okamoto,F.E. Manager-Chief Engineer RQ:dfg copy - Planning Department Mr. Giampaolo "Paul"Boschetti Carlsmith Ball LLP 4tl'•d" tyr' os t4% Harry Kim William A.Kucharski Mayor l i " %/ Director r.s Roy Takemoto M,.r•. Diane A.Noda Managing Director Deputy Director County of Hawaii DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 345 Kekuanao'a Street,Suite 41 • Hilo,Hawai'i 96720 Ph:(808)961-8083 • Fax:(808)961-8086 Email: cohdem@hawaiicounty.gov MEMORANDUM TO: Michael Yee, Director Planning Departme t FROM: William A. Kucharski, lirector Environmental Management Department DATE: October 6, 2020 SUBJECT: Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 10 32 (REZ 09-000103) Applicant: Ikaika Ohana (formally Giampaolo Paul Boschetti) Request: Amendment to Conditions E, G,J, P, and R Tax Map Keys: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053, 080 The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Solid Waste Division for details): X ) No comments. Commercial operations, State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit organization may not use transfer stations for disposal. Aggregates and any other construction/demolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the West Hawai'i Organics Facility and East Hawai'i Organics Facility, or other suitable diversion programs. Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines. Existing Solid Waste Management Plan is to be followed. Provide updatedate to the department on current status. Other: Planning Dept.County of Hawaii is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer 1 a e 6 7 7 Exhibit l V Mr. Michael Yee, Director October 6, 2020 Page 2 The Wastewater Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Wastewater Division for details): No comments. Require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 of the Hawaii County Code. Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21- 26.1 of the Hawaii County Code. Complete Sewer Extension Application. Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 of the Hawai'i County Code. X ) Check or line out as applicable: [ ] If required by the Director of the Department of Environmental Management ("Director of DEM"), [ X ] applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the then applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvements as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation of impacts of the proposed project. Contact Wastewater Division Chief for details. Other: WK:mef 1t j Oi..... Harry Kim Paul K.Ferreira L1gtr,r i Polk, C'lucf r`°=,"7 - Kenneth Bugado Jr. Deputy Police Chic) County of Hawaii POLICE DEPARTMENT 349 Kapiolani Street • Hilo.Hawaii 96720-3998 COH .La'?NNr i G£;6-F' O808)935-3311 • Fax 0081961-8865 CT 2O.F.42:21 September 30, 2020 RECO HA4D DELIVERS) TO MICHAEL YEE, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM : J 1°. 't'DNNOR, ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF REA I OP RATIONS BUREAU SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO.10 32 REZ 09-000103); APPLICANT: IKAIKA OHANA (FORMALLY GIAMPAOLO PAUL BOSCHETTI); REQUEST: AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONS E, G, J, P AND R; TAX MAP KEY: 2-4-025:048, 053, 080 Staff, upon reviewing the provided documents, has the following comments: We request to have the applicant complete for review an updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report ("TIAR"). The current report referenced is dated June 21, 2019, while the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic would undoubtedly have to be taken into consideration; we believe an updated TIAR would be useful in determining the traffic impacts of this project on the surrounding area. Amendment to Condition E, specifically related to reducing the number of parking stalls required to 1.25 stalls as required in the zoning code. We believe that the applicant should be required to adhere to the original agreement to "develop additional parking spaces up to a maximum of 60% of the required spaces for the total residential units to be built within the proposed development." There is no street parking on Kapiolani Street and/or Kukuau Street within the area of the development. The County should require the developer to install ample additional parking; there will undoubtedly be more vehicles utilizing this development than the 1.25 parking spaces per unit required by the zoning code can accommodate. The close proximity of this development to the Hawaii Public Safety Building (main police station) parking lot will have a direct negative impact on our operation. We do not have the resources to enforce parking in our parking lot should residents of this development choose to park at the Hawaii Public Safety Building because they have no alternative. Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer' 1 3 6 5 5 5PlanningDept. Exhibit 0 MEMO TO PLANNING DIRECTOR MICHAEL YEE SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO.10 32 PAGE: 2 Amendment to Condition J. the requirement to install traffic control devices. We believe that the applicant should be required to install traffic control devices should they be required by the Traffic Division or Department of Public Works. If none are required then the applicant would not need to install such devices: the deletion of this requirement would put the burden on the County should such devices be deemed necessary prior to the completion of the project. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. If you have any questions, please contact Captain Reed Mahuna of the South Hilo Patrol Division at 961-2214 or via e-mail at reed.mahuna@hawaiicounty.gov. RM I1i/20HQ0796 DAVID Y.IGE s'o' ,. JADE T.BUTAY GOVERNOR S * o a r•ii DIRECTOR A.1 Pt ` Deputy Directors LYNNAS.ARAKbREGAN DEREKJ CHOW ROSS At.HIGASHI EDWIN SNIFFEN STATE OF HAWAII IN REPLY REFER TO: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STP 20-121 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET STP 8.3047 HONOLULU HAWAII 96813-5097 October 7, 2020 Mr. Michael Yee Director COH PLANNING DEPT 12 2020DepartmentofPlanningOGS 25 County of Hawaii RECD BY EMF 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Mr.Christian Kay Dear Mr. Yee: Subject: Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 10-32(REZ 09-000103) Ikaika Ohana- Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Hilo, Hawaii Tax Map Key: (3)2-4-025:048, 053,080 The Hawaii Department of Transportation(HDOT)understands the applicant, Ikaika Ohana is requesting a Time Extension and Amendment to Conditions E, G,J, P and R ofChange of Zone Ordinance No. 10-32. The request is due to a proposed development of approximately 64 multi- family affordable rental housing apartments in Hilo. HDOT previously provided comments on the Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Housing Development in STP 8.2733 dated August 14, 2019(Attached)for the review of an early consultation for draft environmental assessment letter dated July 16,2019. To date,no draft environmental assessment has been provided for review. HDOT has no objections to the time extension and proposed amendments to conditions of Change ofZone Ordinance No. 10-32. We do however offer the following comments based on the materials provided in this request: Airports Division(HDOT-A) 1. HDOT-A's prior comments from our August 14, 2019 letter remains valid. HDOT-A advises Ikaika Ohana to observe and implement all of the applicable recommendations that were provided in our previous letter. Highways Division(HDOT-HWY) 1. There would be no direct impact to State highways related to the 64-unit affordable housing development. The property would be accessed from two County streets: Planning Dept. 1. 3 6 8 4 3 Exhibit 3D Mr. Michael Yee STP 8.3047 October 7, 2020 Page 2 Kapiolani and Kukuao. The June 21, 2019 Traffic Impact Analysis Report(TIAR), provided as Exhibit 5, concludes the proposed action would have no significant impact on the 2021 project buildout traffic conditions at the three County road intersections included in the TIAR study area. The level of service in 2021 would be acceptable(A to D)at all three intersections. 2. No State highway intersections were included in the TIAR study area. However, the project would not have an indirect adverse impact on State highways because 1)there are numerous alternative access routes to the project site in the region that do not include use of State roads,2)the nearest State roadway(State Route 19) is greater than 1 mile from the site,and 3)the projected trip generation associated with the project during peak traffic hours is minor, 32 (AM peak)and 40(PM peak). The TIAR does not identify traffic impacts and no mitigation is recommended. 3. None of the existing conditions in the Change of Zone Ordinance or the proposed amendments to the conditions would adversely impact State highways. If there are any questions,please contact Mr. Blayne Nikaido of the HDOT Statewide Transportation Planning Office at(808) 831-7979 or via email at blayne.h.nikaidoghawaii.gov. Sincerely, 4./ //f/ JADE T. BUTAY Director of Transportation Attachment i , i. _. CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AVENUE P.O.Box 686 filo,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAx 808.935.7975 WWW.CARLSMITH.COM KCARSONKCARLSMITH.COM October 20, 2020 Michael Yee Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Christian Kay Re: Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 Time Extension and Amendments to Conditions Owner: Giampaolo "Paul" Boschetti Applicant: Ikaika Ohana, a Hawaii non-profit corporation TMK Nos.: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 (collectively the "Project") Dear Mr. Yee: This letter is in response to the comments received from the Hawaii County Police Department dated September 30, 2020 regarding the subject Rezoning Ordinance Time Extension and Amendment requests. The original development proposed by the Owner contemplated a 100-unit multiple-family residential complex (Owner's former project). The Applicant's proposed Project is a 64-unit multiple-family residential complex,which is a 34% reduction in density Applicant's Project). Updated TIAR. The purpose of the TIAR is to: (1)assess impacts to transportation facilities in the immediate vicinity and general area of the project, and to the transportation facilities serving the project area, (2) include projections for future growth in traffic of 5-, 10- and 20-years, and(3)evaluate alternative plans for mitigating impacts, if any. An acceptable level of service(LOS) in the AM and PM peak hours is "D" or better. In February 2009, Witcher Engineering prepared a TIAR for the Owner's former project. The 2009 TIAR found that: (1)the level of service(LOS) for each of the driveways onto Kukuau and Kapiolani Streets were at either an "A" or"B" during the AM and PM peak hours under the 20-year forecast and(2) both streets did not justify mitigative measures. In June, 2019, Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc., prepared a new Final Draft TIAR for the Applicant's Project and analyzed the potential project-related traffic impacts and operations at the intersections of: (1) Kukuau Street and Kupukupu Street, (2) Kapiolani Street and Kukuau HONOLULU HILO KONA Planning Dept. 13 6 913 Exhibit p s , Michael Yee October 20, 2020 Page 2 Street and(3) Kapiolani Street and Hualalai Street. The TZAR concluded that the LOS at the study areas for existing 2019 conditions and base year 2021 conditions operate at overall acceptable limits(LOS D or better)during both AM and PM peak hours. The TIAR concluded that all studied intersections are anticipated to operate within acceptable limits based on State and County of Hawai'i standards and no traffic mitigation improvements are recommended. While the 2009 TIAR contemplated a project that was over 55% larger than the current planned 64-unit project, both TIARs indicate that development would have slight or no impact on local traffic, and that general growth in the area would likely have a bigger impact on traffic. Although the 2019 TIAR was completed 14 months prior to the submittal of this rezoning time extension and amendment request, an updated TIAR is not likely to increase knowledge of traffic or growth patterns in the area. Further,current COVID-19 crisis and related shutdown of businesses and schools within County of Hawaii may result in artificially reduced traffic counts, hence skewing the analysis. Thus, the 2019 TIAR is likely a more reliable projection of future growth than a TIAR conducted during the conditions created by the COVID-19 pandemic. So in light of these unusual times, the Applicant requests that this concurrency requirement to prepare an updated TIAR, as required under Section 25-2-46(d), Hawaii County Code be waived. Condition E - Parking Spaces. The Applicant designed the Project site plan to maximize flexibility and to reflect a balance of uses, including strictures, parking, paths of travel, open spaces, amenities and livability in keeping with similar affordable housing projects within Hawaii County. Pursuant to Sections 25-4-51 and 25-4-52, HCC, the Applicant's Project would require one and one quarter spaces per unit. Therefore, there is sufficient on-site parking to accommodate the Project. The Applicant acknowledges the Police Department's concerns relating to no street parking in the vicinity of the Hawaii Public Safety Building Main Police Station,and sufficient parking for the residents will be provided on-site. Condition J - Traffic Control Devices. As documented in the 2009 and 2019 TIARs, the traffic impacts in the immediate vicinity and general area of the Project is at an acceptable LOS in the AM and PM peak hours and is anticipated to have slight or no impact on traffic. Therefore, no alternative plans for mitigation should be required, including the installation of traffic control devices. Sincerf ly, Katherine A. Garson KAG:KYL xc: Police Department 4849-2897-0958.2 CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUENUE AL'ENL:E P.O.Box 686 Hrio,HAWAII 96721-0686 TELEPIIONE 808.935.6644 FAx 808.935.7975 WWW.CARLSMITH.COM KGARSONoCARLSMlTH.COM October 20, 2020 Michael Yee 1 Planning DirectorAC1 NAL Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo,Hawaii 96720 Attention: Christian Kay Re: Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 Time Extension and Amendments to Conditions Owner: Giampaolo "Paul" Boschetti Applicant: Ikaika Ohana, a Hawaii non-profit corporation TMK Nos.: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 (collectively the "Project") Dear Mr. Yee: This letter is in response to the comments received from the County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management, Wastewater Branch ("DEM Wastewater")dated October 6, 2020 requiring that the Applicant conduct a sewer study. In September 2019, the Applicant submitted to DEM Wastewater, the Project sewer calculations and was preliminarily informed that the County's existing sewer system within Kukuau Street is sufficient to handle the estimated sewer generated from the Project. The Applicant will complete a sewer study in accordance with applicable wastewater system design standards. Sincerely. Katherine A. Garson KAG:KYL xc: DEM, Wastewater Branch 4812-0357-6782.1 136914 HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI Planning Dept. Exhibit /J CARLSMITH BALL LLP A LIMITED LIABILITY LAW PARTNERSHIP 121 WAIANUEWEAVEIaJE P.O.BOX 686 HILO,HAWAII 96721.0686 TELEPHONE 808.935.6644 FAX 808.935.7975 WWW.CARLSMITH.COM KGARSONdCAR[SMITH COM October 22, 2020 Michael Yee Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Attention: Christian Kay Re: Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 Time Extension and Amendments to Conditions Owner: Giampaolo "Paul" Boschetti Applicant: Ikaika Ohana, a Hawaii non-profit corporation TMK Nos.: (3)2-4-025:048, 053 and 080 (collectively the "Project") Dear Mr. Yee: This letter is in response to the comments received from the State Department of Transportation("HDOT")dated October 7, 2020, under its communications STP 20-121 and STP 8.3047. The HDOT did not raise any objections to the subject time extension and proposed amendment to conditions request under Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32, but provided comments from its Airport and Highways Divisions related to the Applicant's early consultation in preparation of the draft environmental assessment for the proposed Project. Applicant responds to those comments as follows: Airport Division(HDOT-A). Due to the proposed Project's proximity to the Hilo International Airport, the Applicant will review the documentation identified in HDOT's August 14, 2019 letter and will work with the County and other agencies, as needed to address HDOT-A's concerns during the permit review process. Highways Division(HDOT-HWY). A TIAR was prepared for the proposed Project. The HDOT-HWY acknowledged that the proposed Project would have no direct impact to State highways and that none of the existing conditions or proposed amendments to conditions under Rezoning Ordinance No. 10-32 would adversely impact State Highways. Sincerely, Katherine A. Garson KAG:KYL xc: HDOT 4827-3343-1247 HONOLULU HILO KONA MAUI Planning Dept. 13 7 0 4 0 Exhibit Pe