The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPD BACKGROUND REPORT (USE 20-084)BAIT-AlailiUSE.doc 122920 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT AT&T MOBILITY USE PERMIT APPLICATION (USE 20-000084) AT&T MOBILITY is requesting a Use Permit to allow the construction a non -manned telecommunication facility consisting of a 100 -foot tall monopole with related equipment within a 1,050 -square foot portion of a 441 -acre property situated in the County's Agricultural zoning district. The subject property is located at 13-3820 Pahoa-Kalapana Road (Highway 130) northwest (mauka) of the highway about 0.28 miles north of its intersection with Kama`ili Road, Kamaili, Puna, Hawai`i, TMK: (3) 1-3-001: portion of 007. APPLICANT'S REQUEST 1. Proposed Use: The applicant is requesting a Use Permit to construct a new, non -manned telecommunication facility, consisting of a 100 -foot tall monopole tower, an antenna array consisting of four (4) sectors with three (3) antennas per sector for a total of twelve 12) antennas, thirty-six (36) remote radio heads, six (6) surge suppressors and one GPS antenna. No exterior lighting is proposed for the site. In addition to the tower and antennas, the 1,050 -square foot (35'x 30') lease area would be used for accessory ground facilities located within a prefabricated enclosed equipment shelter mounted on a raised concrete pad. The leased area will be enclosed with a 6 -foot high chain-link fence with green privacy slats, and a 12 -foot wide locked access gate. The proposed facility will be unmanned, and maintenance and repair activities will be performed by a technician on a periodic basis, typically once a month within normal working hours. The applicant will comply with all Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules. Additionally, the facility will not interfere with the County's public safety radio system. Lastly, AT&T is amenable to developing the proposed tower as a stealth facility (e.g. monopalm, monopine, monobroadleaf, etc.) in order to minimize visual impacts. 2. Reason for the Request: According to the applicant, the objective of this project is to fill a gap in AT&T's 4G LTE network coverage experienced by its customers in Kama`ili Homesteads, Kalapana, and areas south of Pahoa and along Pahoa-Kalapana Road. 1 AT&T has an existing telecommunication site in Pahoa and a temporary site in Kalapana as shown in Attachment 3 (RF Justification) of the application. The facility would fill a gap for emergency responders and provide a needed site in the FirstNet program, which is the Country's first nationwide communications platform dedicated to public safety. According to the applicant, FirstNet gives first responders a dedicated highly secure, interoperable network supporting voice, data, text, and video communications. In addition, the site will also expand AT&T's 5G network in support of the next generation of wireless technology. 3. Co-location: The monopole tower will be designed to accommodate co-location of antennas for other qualified providers if it can be done without substantial interference to AT&T's use of this tower. 4. Alternative Sites Considered: According to the applicant, there are no existing telecommunications facilities available for collocation that offer coverage along Pahoa- Kalapana Road, south of Leilani Estates. SBA Towers has a 150-foot tall tower in Nanawale Estates and Verizon Wireless has a 150-foot tall tower in Leilani Estates that are located about 5 miles and 2.4 miles, respectively, from the subject property. These facilities are outside the search ring and would not provide satisfactory coverage required for FirstNet along Pahoa-Kalapana Road and the Kalapana community. Two alternative properties were considered to the south and north of the subject property along Pahoa- Kalapana Road, but the property to the south was not selected because it sits at a lower elevation and the property to the north was not selected because it would not provide as much coverage towards Kalapana. 5. Tower Height Justification: According to Attachment 3 ofthe application, the proposed 100-foot tall monopole is the minimum height necessary to fill gap coverage and provide reliable telephone and data service. The applicant also considered a 50-foot tall tower but determined a 100-foot tall tower is the minimum height needed to achieve adequate coverage. 6. Supportive Information: The applicant has submitted the attached in support of the request: (Planning Department Exhibit 1 — Letter dated November 6, 2020 from Andrew Tomlinson containing a Use Permit Application dated November 3, 2020 2 and P.D. Exhibit 2- Email dated December 28, 2020 from Andrew Tomlinson regarding designing a stealth tower facility) 7. Landowner: Sanfords Service Center Inc. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 8. Telecommunications Act of 1996: The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 704, as amended, which amended portions of the 1934 Act, limits state or local authorities from regulating the placement, construction, and modification ofpersonal wireless service facilities on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequency emissions, as long as such facility towers comply with the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) regulations conceming such emissions. The applicant will adhere to FCC regulations. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 9. State Land Use District:. Agricultural. 10. General Plan LUPAG Map Designation: Extensive Agriculture. 11. County Zoning: A -20a. 12. Puna Community Development Plan (CDP): The Puna CDP was adopted by the Hawaii County Council, Ordinance 08 116, on September 10, 2008. Under Public Safety and Sanitation Services in the plan, Action 3.4.3(e) states "Encourage enhancement of cell phone service to expand coverage to more remote areas." 13. Special Management Area: The Special Management Area is a part of the Coastal Zone Management Program and regulated by the County. The property is outside ofthe Special Management Area and is located about 3 miles from the nearest coastline. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA 14. Description of Property and Permit Area: The 441 -acre property is irregular in shape and sits at an elevation of 1,080 feet. The property was inundated by the Iilewa Lava Flow of 1955 that rendered the property unusable for farming; however, it was not inundated during the 2018 eruption of the Lower East Rift Zone. A portion of the subject property is used as a quarry and for stockpiling operations under Special Permit No. 906 issued in 1995. A private, gated dirt and gravel access road runs about 6,250 feet from the northeast tip of the property on Piihoa-Kalapana Road to the southwest. The proposed 1,050 -square foot lease area is situated in the northeast tip of the property and is over 3 4,000 feet from the quarry and is setback about 420 feet from Pahoa-Kalapana Road and over 700 feet from the north and west property lines. 15. Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses: Surrounding properties are similarly zoned A -20a and consist of vacant lands and farms. The closest dwelling is located about 1,100 feet northwest of the lease area. 16. Flood Zone: Zone X, an area determined by FEMA to be outside the 500 -year flood plain. 17. Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH): Unclassified. 18. Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classification System: "D" or "Poor" soils. 19. U.S.D.A. Soil Survey: 'Ola'a cobbly hydrous loam, which consists of ash fields over a'a lava. 20. Flora and Fauna Resources: The property is located over 2 miles east of the Wao Kele O Puna Forest Reserve. A Natural Resources Review was conducted by EBI Consulting in June 2020 and by SWCA in May 2020. The review included examination of federal and state databases of species and critical habitats and a field reconnaissance survey in May 2020. Vegetation on the property consists of palm trees and other non-native vegetation along Pahoa-Kalapana Road and `6hi`a and non-native forest vegetation surrounding the proposed lease area. Vegetation would be cleared at the project site to accommodate the proposed facility. The Natural Resources Review determined that the biological resources of the area have been altered by development and that the facility may affect but is unlikely to adversely affect one or more of the following threatened and endangered species that may be in the project vicinity: Hawaiian hoary bat, Hawaiian goose, Ha`iwale plant, Hawaiian hawk, Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shearwater, and band- rumped storm petrel. In letters dated March 13, 2020 and November 18, 2020, the US Fish and Wildlife Service and DLNR- Division of Forestry and Wildlife, respectively, recommended several measures to avoid or minimize project impact to these species. 21. Archaeological/Historic/Cultural Resources: A cultural resources literature review, field inspection, and consultation with native Hawaiian organizations was completed by EBI ad TCP Hawai`i LLC in 2020 and found no historic properties in the lease area. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) noted that there may be native Hawaiian burials in lava tubes in the wider vicinity of the project site that may have been inundated by the 4 1955 lava flow. OHA requested that subsurface excavation associated with the proposed facility be monitored by an archaeologist during construction. In a letter dated July 20, 2020, the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) concurred that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed project. (See Attachment 11 of Application). 22. Scenic and Visual Resources: The General Plan identifies views of Mauna Kea and Mauna Loa from various Puna subdivisions as an example of natural beauty in the Puna district. The proposed facility is setback 420 feet from Pahoa-Kalapana Road in a heavily forested area. Due to the substantial tree cover and elevation difference between the project site and surrounding properties ofabout 80 feet, it is anticipated there will be minimal visual impacts to the community for the proposed tower. Additionally, the proposed tower will be painted to blend in with the surrounding landscape which will lessen any adverse visual impacts on surrounding properties. Lastly, AT&T is amenable to developing the proposed tower as a stealth facility (e.g. monopalm, monopine, monobroadleaf, etc.) in order to minimize visual impacts. 23. Public Access: There is no public access to the mountains or the shoreline that runs through the property. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 24. Roadway Access: Access to facility will be from Pahoa-Kalapana Road, which is a State owned and maintained roadway. There is a private, gated dirt and gravel access road into the property and the applicant is proposing a twelve (12)-foot wide, non- exclusive access easement over about 420 feet of this private gravel road to the lease area. The facility will be setback about 25 feet from the private access road. 25. Water: The proposed use does not require water. 26. Wastewater: This use will not generate wastewater. 27. Utilities: Electrical and telephone services are available to the site. 28. Essential Utilities and Services: All essential utilities are available to the subject property. Police and fire services are available about 4 miles away in Pahoa. AGENCY COMMENTS 29. Fire Department: P.D. Exhibit 3 — December 16, 2020 memo 5 30. Department of Land & Natural Resources- Division of Forestry and Wildlife: P.D. Exhibit 4 — November 18, 2020 letter AGENCY - NO COMMENTS/CONCERNS 31. County Civil Defense Agency, Police Department. AGENCY - NO RESPONSE 32. State Department of Health, County Real Property Tax Office. PUBLIC COMMENTS 33. P.D. Exhibit 5- Email from Jacklynn Ruggirello dated December 4, 2020 and Applicant's response dated December 10, 2020. 34. P.D. Exhibit 6- Email from Elijah Donat dated December 3, 2020 and Applicant's response dated December 10, 2020. 6 AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application County of Hawaii 11/3/2020 Planning Dept. Exhibit 1 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING COMMISSION USE PERMIT APPLICATION Type or legibly print the requested information) APPLICANT: AT&T Mobility by Andrew Tomlinson, J5 Infrastructure APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE: (see Letter of Authorization)DATE: 1173/2020 ADDRESS: 500 Kahelu Ave., Mililani, HI 96089 LIST APPLICANT'S INTEREST IF NOT OWNER. Leasee TELEPHONE:(Bus.) 808.621.8924 (Res) (Fax) LANDOWNER(S): SANFORDS SERVICE CENTER INC. LANDOWNER SIGNATURE(5)see Letter of Authorizatin) DATE: May be by lever) ADDRESS: 15-2628 KEAAU-PAHOA RD., PAHOA HI 96778 TAX MAP KEY (3} 13-001:007 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD, PAHOA, HI 96778 REQUESTED USE: Telecommunications Tower ZONING: AG -a20 SIZE OF PROPERTY: 441.3660 ac AGENT: Andrew Tomlinson, J5 Infrastructure ADDRESS: 677 Ala Moana Blvd, Honolulu, HI 96813 TELEPHONE:(Bus.) (808) 451-2840 (Res.) Fax) Please indicate to whom onginal correspondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL: Andrew Tomlinson COPIES; Attachment 1— Project Narrative AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application PROJECT NARRATIVE USE PERMIT HIL03345 LEILANI ESTATES Submitted to County of Hawaii Planning Department Applicant: Representative: Property -Owner: Project Address: Description & Tax Lot: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") 500 Kahelu Avenue Mililani, Hawaii 96789 15 Infrastructure Partners (IS") 677 Ala Moana Boulevard, Suite 917 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Contact: Andrew Tomlinson 808-864-8567 atomliinson@jsip.com SANFORDS SERVICE CENTER INC. 15-2628 KEAAU-PAHOA RD. PANDA, HI 96778 13-3820 PAHOA-KALAPANA RD PANDA, HI 96778 GPS Coordinates: 19° 26' 23.778" N, 154° 56' 42.460" W Tax Map Key: (3) 1-3-001:007 Zoning Classification: State LUC Ag, County of Hawaii A -20a 15 is submitting this application on behalf of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ("AT&T") and the underlying property owner. ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estates Page 2 of 18 1. PROJECT OVERVIEW New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, dba AT&T Mobility ("AT&T") is proposing to build a new telecommunications facility ("Facility"), HIL03345 Leilani Estates, at the above noted project address. The facility will provide an important public benefit by including equipment to support the FirstNet Nationwide Safety Public Broadband Network' ("FirstNet"). As a FirstNet site, this proposed Facility is part of a more significant initiative by AT&T to upgrade existing wireless sites and to build new sites to support FirstNet and deploy the new frequency band for first responders ("Band 14"). The facility also is intended to provide expanded commercial AT&T 4G LTE wireless phone service to the Kamaili Homesteads, Ka lapana, areas south of Pahoa and along Pahoa-Kalapana Road. The Facility also will include AT&T's 850MHz low -band 5th Generation ("SG") technology. AT&T intends for its application for the proposed Facility to include the following documents collectively, "AT&T's Application"): Attachment 1—Project Narrative (this document) Attachment 2—Statement of Code Compliance Attachment 3—AT&T RF Justification Attachment 4—AT&T MPE Report Attachment 5—FAA TOWAIR Determination Report Attachment 6—Site Photos & Photo Simulations Attachment 7—Letters of Authorization Attachment 8—Zoning Drawings Attachment 9—List of Property Owners Attachment 10—Real Property Tax Clearance Attachment 11—NEPA Screening Report Flora and Fauna Report Attachment 12 – Flood Hazard Report Attachment 13 – AT&T Option & Land License - redacted As shown in AT&T's Application, this proposed project meets all applicable requirements of the Hawaii County Code 1983 (2016 Edition, as Amended) for siting new wireless communications facilities and complies with all other applicable state and federal laws and regulations. AT&T's proposal is also the least intrusive means of meeting its coverage objectives for this site. Accordingly, AT&T respectfully requests the County of Hawaii Planning Director and The First Responder Network Authority ("FirstNet Authority') is an independent authority within the U.S. Department of Commerce. Chartered in 2012, its mission is to ensure the building, deployment, and operation of the FirstNet Nationwide Safety Public Broadband Network—the nationwide broadband network that equips first responders to save lives and protect U.S. communities. FirstNet grew out of and addresses a 9/11 Commission recommendation calling for improved communications for all U.S. first responders. Learn more at First N et.gov/media k it ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estates Page 3 of 18 Commission to approve this project as proposed, subject only to the County of Hawaii standard conditions of approval. 2. PROPOSED PROJECT DETAILS 2.1. Site Description Detailed information regarding the subject property and proposed lease area is Attachment 8—Zoning Drawings, to AT&T's application. uded in 2.1.1. Subject property. The subject 441 -acre property is owned by Sanfords Service Center, Inc. and is located in Karnali' Homesteads at 13-3820 Pahoa-Kalapana Road, Pahoa, HI 96778 on the island of Hawaii, TMK: (3) 1-3-001:007 (the "Property"). A private, gated dirt and gravel access road runs approximately 6,250 feet from the northeast tip of the property on Pahoa- Kalapana Road to the southwest. Low-density private residential development lies to the west and east. The Property is within the State "Agriculture" Land Use district and zoned by the County of Hawaii as A -20a. The area is designated as "Extensive Agriculture" in the Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map of the Hawaii County General Plan. The subject property is classified as having poor and very poor productivity ratings ("D" and "E") by the Land Study Bureau and is in the category of "Other Important Agricultural Lands" by the Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaii (ALISH) Map. The proposed facility is not in the Special Management Area (SMA). The proposed facility is located within the area covered by the Puna Community Development Plan. A discussion of the relationship of the proposed facility to the plan is included in Attachment 2—Statement of Code Compliance. A portion (approximately 1.1 acres) of the subject property is used as a quarry and for stockpiling operations under Special Permit 906 (SPP 906). The nearest portion of the quarrying and stockpiling operation to the proposed Facility is approximately 4,000 feet southwest. The subject property was inundated by the lilewa lava Flow in 1955 that rendered the parcel unsuitable for farming. The parcel was not inundated during the most recent lava event in 2018. 2.1.2. Lease area. The proposed 35 -ft x 30 -ft lease area (1,050 sq. ft.) for the facility (the "Lease Area') is located on the northeastern corner the Property on the access road approximately 420 feet from the property tine on the mauka side of the Pahoa-Kalapana Road at an elevation of approximately 1,040 feet msl. The Lease Area will be setback 25 feet from the private access road and will include the proposed 100 foot monopole and an 12'x20' ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estates Page 4 of 18 equipment shelter that all will be surrounded by a 6 -ft high chain link fence with green privacy slats and a 12 -ft wide locked access gate (See Attachment 8 Final Zoning Drawings). AT&T's access rights to the Lease Area and the private road are identified in Attachment 13—AT&T Option & Land License — redacted. 2.1.3. Access and parking. Access to the Facility will be from Pahoa-Kalapana Road down the property's private access road (approximately 420 feet). AT&T is proposing a 12' wide non-exclusive access easement, as outlined in Attachment 8—Zoning Drawings. Access into the Facility itself will be for authorized personnel only. Parking will be inside the lease area. No public parking is required or proposed for the site. 2.2. Project Description - Wireless Facilities and Equipment Specifications of the facilities outlined below, including a site plan, can be found in Attachment 8—Zoning Drawings, to AT&T's Application. 2.2.1. Support structure, Antennas, and accessory equipment. AT&T proposes to install an unmanned 100' monopole telecommunication tower with related equipment. An antenna array for AT&T will be at a tip height of 100' consisting of four (4) sectors with three (3) antennas per sector for a total of twelve (12) antennas, thirty-six (36) remote radio heads, six (6) surge suppressors and on (1) GPS antenna. No exterior lighting is proposed for the site. Upon review and recommendation by the Department of Planning and as a condition of approval from the Windward Planning Commission, AT&T will be amenable to developing the proposed Facility as a stealth facility (e.g. monopalm, monopine, monobroadleaf, etc.). 2.2.2. Hours of Operation. Besides the initial construction activity, the facility will be serviced by AT&T technicians on a periodic basis. It is reasonable to expect routine maintenance and inspection of the facility once a month during normal working hours. Beyond this intermittent service, AT&T will require 24-hour access to the facility to ensure that technical support is immediately available if, and when, warranted. 2.2.3. Ground equipment. The Tower and all ground equipment will be constructed within the 1,050 -foot Lease Area. The ground equipment will be enclosed within a prefabricated 20ft x 13ft walk-in, air-conditioned shelter mounted on a raised concrete pad. A backup 30kW AC generator with a 148 -gallon tank will also be housed within the enclosed shelter. The emergency generator is Tier 4 Final EPA -Certified for Stationary Emergency and Non -Emergency Applications. The fuel tank will be monitored and maintained by AT&T's technicians. ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HL03345 tellani Estates Page 5 of 18 2.3. Project Environment and Impacts A Notional Environmental Policy Act Screening Report ("NEPA Screening Report") was completed for the proposed facility by EBI Consulting on August 7, 2020 to evaluate the proposed wireless facility in accordance with Federal Communications Commission FCC) NEPA implementing rules (47 CFR §1.1301-1.1320) to determine if it may have a significant environmental effect for which an Environmental Assessment (EA) is required. (See Attachment 11—NEPA Screening Report) Based upon the results of EBI's assessment, the Wireless Facility will not result in a significant environmental effect per §1.1307(a) of FCC NEPA Rules. As such, the preparation of an Environmental Assessment for these criteria is not required. Please refer to the NEPA Summary Checklist, Section 2.0, and the attachments for complete details of FBI's evaluation in Attachment 11—National Environmental Policy Act Screening Report. 2.3.1. Natural Resources Review A Natural Resources Review of the Property was conducted by EBI Consulting in June 2020 and SWCA in May 2020 (See Attachment i1—NEPA Screening Report). The review included examination of federal and state databases of species and critical habitats and a field reconnaissance survey on May 7, 2020. The area of the subject Property on which the Facility is proposed currently consists of palm trees and other native and non-native vegetation along Pahoa-Kalapana Road. Land immediately surrounding the proposed Lease Area consists of mixed'ohi'a Metrosideros polymorpha) j non-native forest vegetation, with ruderal vegetation limited to the margins of the existing road. The biological resources of the area have been altered by development. The proposed installation would result in vegetation clearance at the immediate site but should have little effect on the surrounding environment. 2.3.1.1. Wilderness Areas The project area and vicinity is not located within a federal -designated Wilderness Area, Please refer to Attachment 11—NEPA Screening Report for relevant supporting documentation. 2.3.1.2. Wildlife Preserves The project area is not located within a federal -designated Wildlife Preserve. Please refer to Attachment 11—NEPA Screening Report for relevant supporting documentation. 2.3.1.3. Protected Species and Critical Habitats EBI utilized the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation3 online project review tool to identify federal -listed threatened and endangered species that are ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estate Page 6 of 18 known to occur within the vicinity (See Attachment 11—NEPA Screening Report). EBI also reviewed the USFWS Critical Habitat Portal online mapping tool to identify critical habitats within the immediate project vicinity. EBI also evaluated State - protected species and habitat data to evaluate whether either might be present in the project vicinity. Based on EBI's review, suitable habitats capable of supporting one or more of the listed species are potentially present at or near the Project Site. However, based on project design, location and/or the implementation of recommended mitigation measures (See Attachment 11—NEPA Screening Report, Appendix B for complete details), it is anticipated that the Wireless Facility 'may affect but is not likely to adversely affect' one or more of the identified species - Hawaiian hoary bat, Hawaiian goose (nene), Haiwale, Hawaiian Hawk, Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shearwater, and band-rumped storm petrel. Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius) is known to inhabit a broad range of forested areas throughout the Island of Hawaii. Breeding Season is between March 1 - September 30th. The hawk depends on native forest for nesting from sea level to 8,530 feet above mean sea level (amsl). This is the only broad -winged hawk that breeds on the Big Island in trees greater than 30 feet tall. Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) roosts in both exotic and native woody vegetation taller than 15 feet, foraging in trees and shrubs from as low as 3 feet from the ground to higher than 500 feet. Birthing and pup rearing season fall between June 1st -September 15th. This elusive bat is found primarily from sea level to 13,000 feet msl on the island of Hawaii. Hawaiian goose (nene, Branta sandvicensis) prefers open areas such as pastures, golf courses, beach strands, wetlands, natural grasslands, shrublands, and lava flows. It nests on the ground in ruderal vegetation. Breeds from September -April. It ranges from coastal lowlands to alpine areas occurring from sea level to 7,800 feet msl. Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shearwater, and band-rumped storm petrel. Hawaiian seabirds may traverse the project area at night during the breeding, nesting and fledging seasons (March 1 to December 15). Outdoor lighting could result in seabird disorientation, fallout, and injury or mortality. Seabirds are attracted to lights and after circling the lights they may become exhausted and collide with nearby wires, buildings, or other structures or they may land on the ground. Downed seabirds are subject to increased mortality due to collision with automobiles, starvation, and predation by dogs, cats, and other predators. Young birds (fledglings) traversing the project area between September 15 and December 15, in their first flights from their mountain nests to the sea, are particularly vulnerable. Listed seabirds have been documented colliding with communication towers, particularly in areas of high seabird passage rate. In general, self-supporting monopoles are the least likely to ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—K.03345 Leilani Estates Page 7 of 18 result in collisions, whereas lattice towers, particularly those that rely on guy -wires, have a higher risk. Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra nanawaleensis) is a plant endemic to lowland wet forests in the Puna District on the Island of Hawaii, typically occurring in the forest understory. The following conservation measures are proposed relative to the potential impacts of the Facility and construction: If Hawaiian Goose or Nene (Branta sandvicensis) are present during construction activities then all activities within 100 feet (30 meters) will cease, and the bird should not be approached. Work may continue after the bird leaves the area of its own accord. If work must be conducted during the March 1 through September 30, Hawaiian hawk breeding season, a qualified biologist will conduct a nest search of the survey area and surrounding areas immediately prior to the start of construction activities. Pre -construction surveys for Hawaiian hawk are valid for 14 days. If disturbance for the survey area does not occur within 14 days of the survey, an additional survey will be conducted. No vegetation clearing or construction activities should occur within 1,600 feet of any active Hawaiian hawk nest until the chicks have fledged. No trimming or cutting trees containing an active or inactive Hawaiian hawk nest will occur, as nests may be re -used for consecutive breeding seasons. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting will be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. If any site clearing is required, it will be timed to avoid disturbance during the Hawaiian Hoary Bat or 'Ope'ape'a (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). Barbed wire will not used at the Facility. If felling of standing trees occurs during the bat breeding season (June 1—September 15) direct impacts could occur to juvenile bats that are too small to fly but too large to be carried by a parent. To minimize this impact, no trees taller than 15 feet will be trimmed or removed during this season. To prevent the spread of Rapid 'Ohi'a Death (ROD) if 'Ohi'a trees are present and will be removed, trimmed, or potentially Injured, DOFAW requests that the information and guidance at the following website be reviewed and followed: https://cros.ctahr.hawaii.edufrod. DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites, such as in fill. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens (e.g. ROD), vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little. Fire Ants), or invasive plant parts that could harm our native species and ecosystems. DOFAW recommends consulting the Big Island Invasive Species Committee at (808) 933-3340 in planning, design, and construction ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estates Page 8 of 18 of the project to learn of any high-risk invasive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel will be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive species. Per DOFAW recommendation surveying for rare and endangered plants that may occur in the area will be completed prior to construction. All Project personnel must follow the biosecurity protocol when operating on Hawaii Island to prevent the introduction of harmful invasive species to local natural areas. Nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 15 through December 15 will be avoided. 2.3.2. Archaeology, Historic, and Cultural Resources. A cultural resources literature review, field inspection, and consultation with native Hawaiian organizations was completed by EBI and TCP Hawaii LLC in 2020 (Attachment 11—NEPA Screening Report). An announcement of the proposed project and request for information on historical resources in the area was posted in the Hawaii Herald - Tribune on 3/4/20. No significant historic properties or National Register -eligible historic properties were identified in the lease area or its vicinity. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs OHA") noted that there may be native Hawaiian burials in lava tubes in the wider vicinity of the project site that may have been inundated by the 1955 lava flow. OHA requested that subsurface excavation associated with the proposed facility be monitored during construction. The State Historic Preservation Division on July 20, 2020 concurred with the determination of the NEPA Screening Report of "No Historic Properties Affected" pursuant to HAR §13-284-7(a)(1) and 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1). 2.3.3. Visual Impacts. The proposed Facility is setback 420 feet from the Pahoa-Kalapana Road in a heavily forested area. Due to the substantial tree cover surrounding the subject property and adjacent to the Pahoa-Kalapana Road corridor it is anticipated there will be minimal visual impacts to the community from the proposed monopole (See Attachment 6—Site Photos & Photo Simulations). Upon review and recommendation by the Department of Planning and as a condition of approval from the Windward Planning Commission, AT&T will be amenable to developing the proposed Facility as a stealth facility (e.g. monopalm, monopine, monobroadleaf, etc.). 2.3.4. Public Services, Utilities, and Traffic. The proposed project does not require wastewater disposal or water facilities. The proposed project does not require public parking or traffic control measures. The ATTACHMENT 1—Proj< AT&T's Application—H Page 9 of 18 Estate unmanned facility only requires periodic maintenance and will not generate additional traffic in the area. Electrical power and backhaul will be accessed through existing overhead power lines. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed communications facility will not create unusual noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable, detrimental or incompatible with other permitted uses in the vicinity, in particular: The equipment associated with the facility operates virtually noise -free. The equipment does not emit fumes, smoke, dust, wastewater or odors. The equipment does not require water, or sewage disposal. The facility is unmanned and requires only periodic maintenance. The proposed facility will not result in conditions or circumstances contrary to the public health, safety and general welfare in that advanced technologies, such as wireless telecommunications, are an asset to local businesses and individual customers. All AT&T telecommunications facilities operate in full compliance with the regulations and licensing requirements of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). 2.3.5. Radio Frequency Radiation. A Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) study (see Attachment 4—MPE Report) was completed by SitesSafe, RF Compliance Experts for the proposed Facility to determine if the Facility would comply with FCC regulations. Sitesafe determined that the maximum cumulative simulated RFE Level at ground level would be <1% General Public Limit. Upon evaluation of the cumulative RF emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations, SiteSafe determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on General Public RFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RE signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non- compliant. ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estates Page 10 of 18 Required Changes include: Monopole Access Location 1) Yellow Caution 28 sign required at structure access. 2.3.6. Flood Hazards and Wetlands The Property is in Flood Hazard Zone X: "Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain" (see Attachment 12—Flood Hazard Report). A review of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (See Attachment 11— NEPA Screening Report) did not identify any wetlands in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site. EBI also reviewed the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey (W55) for the Project Site and immediate vicinity. According to FBI's review, soils at the Project Site consist of 1) Olaa cobbly hydrous loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes, and 2) Malama extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material, 2 to 40 percent slopes. 1) is well -drained soil that supports a water table greater than 80 inches with a restrictive layer 26 to 39 inches to lithic bedrock. 2) is also well -drained soil supporting a water table greater than 80 inches, with a restrictive feature 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock. These soils are not listed as hydric by the NRCS http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/main/soils/use/hydric/). Based on FBI's review as summarized above, the proposed communications facility installation is not anticipated to impact wetlands. 2.3.7. Community Engagement An announcement of the proposed project and request for information on historical resources in the area was posted in the Hawaii Herald -Tribune on 3/4/20. The Office of Hawaiian Affairs ("OHA") noted that there may be native Hawaiian burials in lava tubes in the wider vicinity of the project site that may have been inundated by the 1955 lava flow. OHA requested that subsurface excavation associated with the proposed facility be monitored during construction. AT&T has since conducted outreach to government officials discuss the need for the proposed Facility, describe the location and design of the proposed Facility, address community questions and concerns, and find the best method for reaching the broader Kamaili Homesteads and Kalapana community for further discussions. Based on these conversations, AT&T determined that the best method for reaching community members and ensuring community awareness in the area would be to expand the county -mandated resident notification process beyond 500ft to 0.25 miles of the proposed Facility (See Attachment 9—List of Property Owners). ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—H1103345 teilani Estates Page 11 of 18 J In addition to expanding the notification radius, along with the county -required notification materials AT&T also included additional information to address frequently asked questions (See Attachment 9—List of Property Owners). As an additional measure, AT&T has also established a dedicated project email account attleilaniestates@j5ip.com) where community members can send questions and request additional information regarding the proposed Facility. 3. AT&T NETWORK COVERAGE AND SERVICES 3.1. Overview—AT&T 56 and 4G LTE AT&T is upgrading and expanding its wireless communications network to support the latest 5G and 4G LTE technology. 5G and 4G stand for "51h Generation" and "4th Generation" and LTE stands for "Long Term Evolution." These acronyms refer to the ongoing process of improving wireless technology standards, which is now in its 5th generation. With each generation comes improvement in speed and functionality -4G LTE offers speeds up to ten times faster than 3G and SG offers speeds up to 1 -gigabit per second (See Attachment -3 RF Justification). This technology is the next step in increasing broadband speeds to meet the demands of uses and the variety of content accessed over mobile networks, and is necessary to facilitate capabilities that are being designed into the latest devices (i.e. Samsung Galaxy 520, iPhone 12). SG, specifically, is the next generation of wireless technology expected to deliver latency and capacity enhancements that will help enable revolutionary new capabilities for consumers and businesses. There are several components of 5G wireless technology and separate bands of wavelength spectrum used to build a 5G network: Low -band 56. Low -band SG frequencies (generally below 2GHz) are the oldest cellular and TV) frequencies and are being used by AT&T to provide widely -available SG service in residential, suburban, and rural areas. This is the same spectrum used for 3G and 4G today. The low -band 850MHz SG frequency is proposed for this Facility. Low -band SG frequencies are a tradeoff of download speed versus distance and service area—they are slower than the high -band mmWave and mid -band frequencies, but they travel the farthest and can pass through more obstacles to provide a better, more reliable indoor and outdoor signal for a larger service area (i.e., miles, not feet). Mid -band 5G. Mid -band SG frequencies (generally 3-10GHz) cover most current cellular and WiFi frequencies and provide broader coverage than high -band mmWaves (typically a half a mile), but with slower speeds. Use of these frequencies is not as prevalent for building a SG network as much of the bandwidth in this range is currently unavailable. ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estates Page 12 of 18 High -band SG+ mmWave. High -band millimeter wave (mmWave) frequencies (generally 20-100GHz) are the new FCC -approved frequencies most associated with SG service— 5G+" is AT&T's name for SG service delivered using high -band mmWave spectrum. AT&T offers an enhanced wireless experience on 5G+ with mmWave service though with more limited coverage. Results continue to be impressive, with peak download speeds up to 1 gigabit per second (Gbps) – fast enough to stream 4K movies. High -band mmWave frequencies deliver this unprecedented performance by transmitting a large amount of data more efficiently than 46 LTE, but can only travel short distances ("'1,000ft). Accordingly, high -band mmWave sites need to be in close proximity to one another and are typically used in dense, high trafficked areas such as urban areas, stadiums/arenas, airports, manufacturing and healthcare centers, etc. 56 wireless technology also includes enhanced network radio protocols and other improvements in data transmission that allow the network to more efficiently use the same frequencies currently used today for 4G. As noted, AT&T is proposing to deploy low -band 850MHz 56 at this Facility. Upon completion, the Facility will become part of AT&T's statewide and nationwide communications networks. 3.2 Statement of Objectives for Proposed Facility This proposed Facility meets AT&T's service objectives (providing outdoor, in -vehicle, and in - building wireless coverage) by filling a gap in AT&T's 4G LTE network coverage experienced by its customers in Kamaili Homesteads, Kalapana, and areas south of Pahoa and along Pahoa- Kalapana Road. The Facility also meets AT&T's objective to provide expanded FirstNet coverage for first responders (as further detailed in Section 4, below). In addition to expanding the 46 LTE network, this site will also expand AT&T's SG network in support of the next generation of wireless technology (See Attachment 3—AT&T RF Justification). AT&T has determined a need for service in this geographic area through a combined analysis of market demand, service requests, radio frequency engineering design, and input from public safety officials. This proposed Facility will provide all AT&T/FirstNet customers with reliable wireless service in the Targeted Service Area, including fewer dropped calls, improved call quality, and emergency 911 calls. The FirstNet network will allow the utilization of the priority and preemption feature and wireless applications (Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD), Records Management System (RMS), Geographic Information System Mapping (GIS), etc.) for faster response and situational awareness, especially during emergency events. The recent 2014 eruption and lava flow of Kilauea Volcano highlight the need for increased wireless communications facilities in the Pahoa and Kalapana areas to support the local community and emergency preparedness. During the 2018 lava flow event, AT&T placed a temporary, Cellular on Wheels (COW) in the area to provide basic coverage for the Kalapana ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—H1103345 Leilani Estates Page 13 of 18 area. The COW provides emergency coverage with no LTE or FirstNet service. The proposed Facility would provide a permanent facility for coverage of the area with 46 LTE, 5G, and FirstNet Band -14. It will allow for uninterrupted wireless service in the Targeted Service Area with fewer dropped calls, improved call quality, and improved access to additional wireless services that the public now demands. 4. FIRSTNET FirstNet is the country's first nationwide communications platform dedicated to public safety, representing a giant leap in communications capabilities for public safety personnel that will benefit the communities they serve. FirstNet gives first responders access to one highly secure, dedicated, interoperable network and ecosystem supporting voice, data, text, and video communications—technology they need to better communicate and collaborate across agencies and jurisdictions. The FirstNet Authority' s mission is to provide and maintain a single, interoperable platform that consistently satisfies the demanding communications needs of the public safety community in Hawaii and across the country. New radio access network {" RAN') sites are essential to the success of the program and delivering the mission critical coverage public safety needs to communicate and save lives. FirstNet will enhance emergency communications for everyday use as well as for large-scale emergencies, weather events and other natural disasters that disrupt the state. For example, Hawaii County Fire Department (HCFD) uses the FirstNet network to view real-time data related to emergency conditions prior to their arrival on site. Similarly, Hawaii County Police Department (HCPD) utilizes the FirstNet network in concert with the County owned Land Mobile Radio (LMR) system to provide communications and rapid access to data. 4.1. FirstNet Authority The First Responder Network Authority ("FirstNet Authority") is an independent authority within the U.S. Department of Commerce. Chartered in 2012, the FirstNet Authority is charged with carrying out public safety's vision of FirstNet, bringing first responders a dedicated communications ecosystem. The FirstNet Authority consulted extensively with each state, tribes, local governments, and the public safety community regarding how FirstNet will be deployed. 4.2. AT&T FirstNet Partnership Through a first -of -its -kind public-private partnership with FirstNet, AT&T is responsible for building, maintaining, operating, and upgrading FirstNet for the next 25 years. AT&T is upgrading its existing wireless sites and building new wireless facilities to deploy the wireless spectrum set aside for public safety—Band 14. Band 14 is designed to be reliable, functional, safe, and secure and provide optimal levels of operational capacity at all times. Additionally, as of January 1, 2018, FirstNet users have access to FirstNet on all AT&T commercial LTE bands, allowing them to also benefit from AT&T's overall improvements to its commercial network. ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estate Page 14 of 18 Simply put, FirstNet provides public safety users with the assurance of network access whenever they need it. Accordingly, AT&T must closely consider location, lease, and facility requirements for the siting, placement, and operation of FirstNet facilities to ensure that, over the course of its 25 -year partnership, appropriate accommodations can be made to support the evolving mission -critical services of FirstNet. In August 2017, Governor Ige opted into the FirstNet Authority plan for RAN deployment in Hawaii and thus authorizing construction of the FirstNet network in areas of the state where public safety needs coverage and capacity. By opting -in, Governor Ige enabled public safety to rapidly access broadband services in Hawaii, while also allowing the prompt buildout and deployment of the network which began in March of 2018. His decision also directed the FirstNet Authority to take on all the risks, costs, and responsibilities associated with deploying the network in Hawaii for 25 years and take immediate steps to make prioritized services and features available to public safety in the state. 4.3. FirstNet Coverage FirstNet, built by AT&T, will span all 50 states, five U.S. territories, and the District of Columbia, including rural communities and tribal lands in those states and territories. As an all -band solution, FirstNet is built on AT&T's commercial LTE bands in addition to Band 14. This gives FirstNet users access to even more coverage and capacity. 4.4. FirstNet Core FirstN et is a separate communications platform operating on a physically separate, dedicated core that is purpose-built for public safety based on their specifications and requirements. The FirstNet core is built on physically separate hardware, which effectively separate public safety's traffic from commercial traffic. The FirstNet core is also monitored 24/7/365 by a dedicated Security Operations Center with a dedicated team of experts. 4.5. Priority and Preemption A key differentiator of FirstNet is always -on priority and preemption with multiple priority levels that primary users can allocate as needed. This technology is available to FirstNet users over the AT&T LTE commercial bands and Band 14. Priority means first responders connect first. Priority moves first responders to the front of the communications line," prioritizing their network needs—they don't have to compete with non -emergency users for a connection. Preemption goes a step further to make sure first responders can access FirstNet when they need to, 24/7/365. Preemption helps ensure first responders have the bandwidth they need, when they need it most—when the communications line becomes crowded, preemption shifts ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HI103345 Milani Estates Page 15 of 18 non -emergency traffic, freeing up space for FirstNet users to easily get through. Calls or texts to 911 will never be preempted or shifted from the network. 5. SEARCH RING AT&T's radio frequency ("RE") engineers performed an RF engineering study, considering multiple objectives, to determine the approximate site location and antenna height required to fulfill the noted network objectives for the Targeted Service Area. From this study, AT&T's RE engineers identified a "search ring" area where a wireless facility may be located to provide effective service in the target coverage area. This includes vital coverage under the FirstNet program for First Responders. The search ring established for this proposal, and a description of the methodology used to identify the search ring, is provided in Attachment 3—RF Justification. 6. ALERNATIVE ANALYSIS AT&T considers all siting possibilities within, and adjacent to, a search ring to determine the best location for a new facility to meet AT&T's service objectives for the Targeted Service Area. AT&T will first attempt to utilize an existing tower or structure for collocation at the desired antenna height. If an existing tower or structure is not available or determined to be infeasible, AT&T will then propose a new tower. For this proposed Facility, AT&T's construction and real estate group, with the assistance of outside consultants, thoroughly analyzed all siting options and requirements, as outlined below, and did not identify any available and/or feasible alternative locations within the search ring to locate the proposed new Facility. Collocation. AT&T surveyed the location of existing towers to identify potential collocation sites. An existing 150ft SBA tower in Nanawele Estates and the 150ft Verizon tower in Leilani Estates were too far outside the search ring to provide required coverage in the Targeted Service Area. 7. APPLICABLE LAW 7.1. Local Codes 7.1.1. Use Permit Pursuant to Chapter 25 section 25-2-61 of the Hawaii County Code relating to Zoning the following uses shall be permitted within designated County zoning districts only if a use permit is obtained for the use from the commission. 11) Telecommunication antennas and towers in RS, RD, RM, RCX, RA, FA, A and IA districts." Also, under Chapter 25 section 254-12 of the Hawaii County Code relating to Telecommunications antennas or towers states "a telecommunication antenna Or ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estate Page 16 of 18 tower may be permitted in all districts, except RS, RD, RM, and RCX districts; provided that the antenna, tower and its use are not hazardous or dangerous to the surrounding area and the director has issued plan approval for such use. A telecommunication antenna or tower may be permitted in the RS, RD, RM and RCX districts if a use permit is obtained for such use." In accordance with the above County Codes, AT&T requests approval of a Use Permit for a new telecommunication facility at the proposed site. See Attachment 2—Statement of Code Compliance for AT&T's demonstration of compliance with the applicable code. 7.2. State of Hawaii Law Chapter 205-4.5 HRS, Permissible uses within the state agricultural district. State Land Use Chapter 205-4.5, HRS, and Chapter 205-5(b) define permissible uses within the state agricultural district and authorize the County of Hawaii to determine uses by zoning ordinance. The Hawaii County zoning for the subject property is A -20a which allows for telecommunications antennas with a Use Permit. See Attachment 2—Statement of Code Compliance for AT&T's demonstration of compliance with the applicable code. 7.3. Federal Law Federal law, primarily found in the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("Telecom Act"), acknowledges a local jurisdiction's zoning authority over proposed wireless facilities but limits the exercise of that authority in several important ways. Local jurisdictions may not materially limit or inhibit. The Telecom Act prohibits a local jurisdiction from taking any action on a wireless siting permit that "prohibit[s] or [has] the effect of prohibiting the provision of personal wireless services." 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(8)(i)(II). According to the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") Order adopted in September 2018,2 a local jurisdiction's action has the effect of prohibiting the provision of wireless services when it "materially limits or inhibits the ability of any competitor or potential competitor to compete in a fair and balanced legal and regulatory environment."3 Under the FCC Order, an applicant need not prove it has a significant gap in coverage; it may demonstrate the need for a new wireless facility in terms of adding capacity, updating to new technologies, and/or maintaining high quality service.4 2 Accelerating Wireless and WirelineBroadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to Infrastructure Investment, Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order, WT Docket No. 17-79, WC Docket No. 17-84, FCC 18-133 (rel. Sept. 27, 2018); 83 Fed. Reg. 51867 Oct. 15, 2018) ("FCC Order"). 3 Id. at ¶ 35. 4 Id. at 11 34-42. ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—H1103345 Callan' Estates Page 17 of 18 While an applicant is no longer required to show a significant gap in service coverage, in the Ninth Circuit, a local jurisdiction dearly violates section 332(c)(7)(B)(0(II) when it prevents a wireless carrier from using the least intrusive means to fill a significant gap in service coverage. T -Mobile U.S.A., Inc. v. City of Anacartes, 572 F.3d 987, 988 (9th Cir. 2009). Significant Gap. Reliable in -building coverage is now a necessity and every community's expectation. Consistent with the abandonment of land line telephones and reliance on only wireless communications, federal courts now recognize that a "significant gap" can exist based on inadequate in -building coverage. See, e.g., T -Mobile Central, LLC v, Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas City, 528 F. Supp. 2d 1128, 1168-69 (D.Kan. 2007), affirmed in part, 546 F.3d 1299 (10th Or. 2008); MetroPCS, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, 2006 WI 1699580, 9E10-11 (N.D. Cal. 2006). Least Intrusive Means. The least intrusive means standard "requires that the provider 'show that the manner in which it proposes to fill the significant gap in service is the least intrusive on the values that the denial sought to serve:" 572 F.3d at 995, quoting MetroPCS, Inc. v. City of San Francisco, 400 F.3d 715, 734 (9th Or. 2005). These values are reflected by the local code's preferences and siting requirements. 7.3.1. Environmental and health effects prohibited from consideration. Also, under the Telecom Act, a jurisdiction is prohibited from considering the environmental effects of RF emissions (including health effects) of the proposed site if the site will operate in compliance with federal regulations. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(iv), AT&T has included with this application a statement from its radio frequency engineers demonstrating that the proposed facility will operate in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission's RF emissions regulations. See Attachment 4—AT&T MPE Report, Accordingly, this issue is preempted under federal law and any testimony or documents Introduced relating to the environmental or health effects of the proposed Facility should be disregarded in this proceeding. 7.3.2. No discrimination amongst providers. Local jurisdiction also may not discriminate amongst providers of functionally equivalent services. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(i)(I). A jurisdiction must be able to provide plausible reasons for disparate treatment of different providers' applications for similarly situated facilities. 7.3.3. Shot Clock. Finally, the Telecom Act requires local jurisdictions to act upon applications for wireless communications sites within a "reasonable" period of time. 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)(B)(ii). The FCC has issued a "Shot Clock" rule to establish a deadline for the issuance of land use permits for wireless facilities. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6001, et seq. A presumptively reasonable period of time for a local government to act on all relevant ATTACHMENT 1—Project Narrative AT&T's Application—HIL03345 Leilani Estates Page 18 of 18 applications for a "macro" wireless facility on a new structure is 150 days. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(c)(1)(iv). The Shot Clock date is determined by counting forward 150 calendar days from the day after the date of submittal, including any required pre -application period. 47 C.F.R. § 1.6003(e). Pursuant to federal law, the reasonable time period for review of this application is 150 days. Attachment 2—Statement of Code Compliance AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application STATEMENT OF CODE COMPLIANCE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HIL03345 LEILANI ESTATES Submitted to Hawaii County Planning Commission and Planning Department AT&T's proposal complies with all requirements of Hawaii County Codes, which are addressed in this Statement of Code Compliance in the following order: Requirements for the New Wireless Facility Use Permit Chapter 25-2-61, Table: Permitted Uses by Zoning District County of Hawaii Planning Department Rules of Practice and Procedure Telecommunications Towers Attachment to Special Permit or Use Permit Applications State Land Use Chapter 205-4.5 HRS – Permissible uses within the state agricultural district. Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism, Hawaii Revised Statues (HRS) Chapter 15-15-95, Land Use Commission Rules Hawaii State Planning Act –Title 13 Chapter 226-10.5 Objectives and policies for the economy—information technology industry. PLEASE NOTE: AT&T's responses to the above referenced criteria are indicated below each applicable provision in the bold italicized blue text below. Use Permit Wireless Facilities Requirements HAWAII COUNTY OF HONOLULU – CHAPTER 25 -ZONING CODE 1.0.1-011 25-1-5 Definitions. "Telecommunications Antenna,' Telecommunications antenna" means an antenna, tower and other accessory structures for radia frequency (RF) transmissions intended for specific users who must have special equipment for transmission and/or reception. Also included are broadcasting facilities regulated by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) under the Code of Federal Regulations, par. 74, which includes low power television. Included are land -mobile or two-way radio, and one-way radio paging service broadcasting. Also included are independent receiving facilities which do not qualify as accessory uses. Not included are portable, hand held and vehicular transceivers or radios; industrial, scientific and medical equipment operating at frequencies designated for that purpose by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC); marketed consumer products, such as microwave ovens, citizens band radios, ham radios and remote control toys; and facilities for the receiving of these transmissions, including individual radio and television appliances. AT&T Response: Applicant is proposing to construct a new freestanding antenna structure so the use is classified as o Telecommunication antenna. Division 6. Use Permits Sec. 25-2-61 Applicability: use permit required. 10) Telecommunication antennas and towers in RS, RD, RM, RCX, RA, FA, A, IA and 0 districts. AT&T Response: Per Table above, the use proposed is a telecommunication facility which is an allowed use in the A district with a Use Permit. The application is accompanied by a site plan - See Attachment 8 Final Zoning Drawings. Sec. 25-2-62. Application for use permit; requirements. a) An application for a use permit shall be made to the commission, in accordance with its rules, on a form prescribed by the commission. AT&T Response: The application is being submitted to the Commission in accordance with its rules with the prescribed Use Permit application form and format. b) The application shall be accompanied by: 1) A filing fee of $500; AT&T Response: A filing fee of $500 is included with this application. 2) A description of the property in sufficient detail to determine the precise location of the property involved; AT&T Response: A description of the property is included in the Project Narrative (See Attachment 1) and on the Zoning Drawings (See Attachment 8 Zoning Drawings). 3) A plot plan of the property, drawn to scale, with all existing and proposed structures shown thereon; AT&T Response: A plot plan is included on the Zoning Drawings (See Attachment 8). 4) A list of names, addresses and tax map key numbers for those owners and lessees of record of surrounding properties who are required to receive notice under section 25-2-4; AT&T Response: The list of names, addresses, and tax map numbers for owners and lessees of record of surrounding properties within a 500' radius is included in Attachment 10. AT&T expanded the area to include properties within .25 miles of the proposed Facility. 5) A written description of the proposed use and a statement of objectives and reasons for the request, including an analysis of how the request satisfies each of the standards contained in section 25-2-65. AT&T Response: A project narrative is included in Attachment 1. The analysis of how the request satisfies each standard in section 25-2-65 is included in this Statement of Code Compliance (see below). Sec. 25-2-63. Procedure for use permit. a) Upon acceptance of a use permit application, the commission shall fix a date for a public hearing. The public hearing shall be commenced no later than ninety days after the acceptance of a use permit application by the director. AT&T Response: Acknowledged. b) The applicant shall serve notice of the use permit application on surrounding owners and lessees of record as provided by section 25-2-4. The applicant shall also serve notice on owners and lessees of record interests in other properties which the commission may find to be directly affected by the use permit sought. The applicant shall also post a sign for public notification on the property as provided by section 25-2-12. AT&T Response: AT&T will serve notice to those listed in Attachment 10 and to those identified by the commission. A notice will be posted on the property as provided by section 25-2-12. c) Prior to the public hearing, the commission shall publish notice of the public hearing in accordance with the requirements of this chapter. AT&T Response: Acknowledged. Section 25-2-65. Criteria for granting a use permit. A use permit may be granted by the commission upon finding that: 1) The granting of the proposed use shall be consistent with the general purpose of the zoning district, the intent and purpose of this chapter, and the general plan; AT&T Response: The proposed use is included as a permitted use within Zoning District A. The proposed Facility is also consistent with the county's genera! plan. As stated in the County of Hawaii General Plan Overview, "The General Plan for the County of Hawaii strives to position Hawaii islandfor economic progress while preserving the environment and strengthening community foundation." The proposed Facility will also provide greater communications capability in remote areas, as envisioned in The Puna Community Development Plan, Sec. 3.4.3(e): Encourage enhancement of cell phone service to expand coverage to more remote areas. Currently, there is insufficient wireless service within this specific area and this new site will provide coverage to the immediate area. Increased cell phone coverage and service contributes to the general welfare of a community and the surrounding neighborhoods. This proposed Facility would fill a gap in AT&T's 4G LTE network coverage experienced by its customers in Kamaili Homesteads, Kalapana, and areas south of Pahoa and along Pahoa- Kalapana Road. The Facility also will provide expanded FirstNet coverage for first responders and expand AT&T's 5G network in support of the next generation of wireless technology (See Attachment 3—AT&T RFlustification). 2) The granting of the proposed use shall not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor cause substantial, adverse impact to the community's character, to surrounding properties; and AT&T Response: Expanded and improved wireless service will be an asset to the general public, businesses, and public safety personnel and will contribute to the general welfare of the community. Additionally, all AT&T wireless facilities operate in full compliance with the regulations and licensing requirements of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The proposed Facility wilt also not cause substantial, adverse impact to the community's character or surrounding properties. The monopole tower is setback 420 feet from the Pahoa- Kalapana Road to reduce the visual impact to the surrounding area. Upon review and recommendation by the Department of Planning and as a condition of approval from the Windward Planning Commission, AT&T will be amenable to developing the proposed Facility as a stealth facility (e.g. monopalm, monopine, monobroadleaf, etc.). 3) The granting of the proposed use shall not unreasonably burden public agencies to provide roads and streets, sewer, water, drainage, schools, police and fire protection and other related infrastructure. The proposed project does not require wastewater disposal or water facilities. The proposed site does not require public parking or traffic control measures. The unmanned facility only requires periodic maintenance and will not generate additional traffic in the area. Electrical power and backhaul will be accessed through existing overhead power lines. The project proposes construction of minimal impervious surfaces within the lease area so potential impacts to drainage will be negligible. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed communications facility will not create unusual noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be 1 objectionable, detrimental or incompatible with other permitted uses in the vicinity, in particular: The equipment associated with the facility operates virtually noise free. The equipment does not emit fumes, smoke, dust, wastewater or odors. The equipment does not require water, or sewage disposal. The facility is unmanned and requires only periodic maintenance. The proposed facility will not result in conditions or circumstances contrary to the public health, safety and general welfare in that advanced technologies, such as wireless telecommunications, are an asset to local businesses and individual customers. The Facility will be part of the FirstNet Network used by Hawaii County First Responders. All AT&T telecommunications facilities operate in full compliance with the regulations and licensing requirements of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Section 25-4-12. Telecommunication antennas or towers. a) A telecommunication antenna or tower shall be permitted in the V, CN, CG, CV, MCX, ML, MG and CDH districts; provided that the antenna, tower, and its use are not hazardous or dangerous to the surrounding area and the director has issued plan approval for such use. A telecommunication antenna or tower may be permitted in the RS, RD, RM, RCX, RA, FA, A, IA, and 0 districts if a use permit is obtained for such use. Where there is an existing telecommunication tower, co - location of additional antenna or equipment will be permitted provided the director has issued plan approval for such use. AT&T Response: The proposed telecommunications tower is in the A district. A Use Permit application for the facility is included in this proposal. b) The minimum setbacks for a telecommunication antenna and tower are as follows: 1) Freestanding antennas and towers shall be set back from every property line a minimum of one foot for every five feet of antenna or tower height. AT&T Response: The proposed telecommunications tower is setback 420 feet from the property line. This meets the minimum setback requirement for a freestanding facility. 2) Telecommunication antennas and towers supported by guy wires shall be set back from every property line a minimum of one foot for every one foot of antenna or tower height. AT&T Response: There are no guy wires proposed for this facility. c) The tower, together with the initial antennas or other equipment proposed to be installed thereon, shall have a hard survivability for sustained winds of at least one hundred miles per hour. AT&T Response: The proposed tower, initial antennas, mounts, and supporting equipment will have a hard survivability for sustained winds of at least one hundred and twenty miles per hour. (See Attachment 8 Zoning Drawings). Hawaii County Code—Division 2. Heights. Section 25-5-73. Height limit. The height limit in the A district shall be thirty-five feet for any residential structure, including any single-family dwelling, or farm dwelling, and forty-five feet for all other structures. The director may, however, permit by plan approval, any nonresidential agricultural structures to be constructed to a height of one hundred feet, if the director determines that the additional height above the forty-five foot height limit is necessary. AT&T Response: Pursuant to section 25-4-22, the proposed Facility as "telecommunication antennas" are exempt from these zoning district height limits, not to exceed 500ft. The proposed Facility is 100ft and qualifies for this height exemption. Section 25-4-22. Exemptions from height limitations: The following structures are exempt from zoning district height limits under the specified restrictions: c) Utility poles and lines and telecommunication antennas not to exceed five hundred feet from existing grade. AT&T Response: The proposed facility is a telecommunications antenna and will not exceed 500 feetfrom the existing grade. Therefore, it is exempt from zone height limitations. TELECOMMUNICATION TOWERS ATTACHMENT TO SPECIAL PERMIT OR USE PERMIT APPLICATIONS In addition to the requirements for submitting a Special Permit or Use Permit Application, please provide the following additional information when applying for a telecommunication tower: 1. What is your schematic plan for tower development on the Big Island? Provide a map and written description of these sites. Justify how this particular subject site plays an integral part in this overall plan. AT&T Response: Tower development planning is dependent on many factors including dynamic demand and capacity requirements, budget, and resource availability. This proposed site would provide important coverage for emergency responders under the FirstNet program and in the Pahoa and Kapalana areas. The proposed site would fill a gap south of AT&T's existing sites in Pahoa (H11.03021 Pahoa and HIL03050 Pahoa Marketplace) and to the temporary site in Kalapana (HIL00810 C Kalapana COW). Further, area specific justification for this site is included in the RF Justification (See Attachment 3). 2. Building plans for the tower, certified by a structural engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii, verifying that the tower, together with initial antennas and other equipment proposed to be installed thereon for co- location, are structurally sound and wind, resistant. AT&T Response: Stomped Final Zoning Plans for the proposed telecommunications facility are included as Attachment 8. 3. A design plan for the tower and appurtenant structures, including discussion on tower selection and antennas, visual impacts, color, lighting, landscaping and safety. AT&T Response: The Project Narrative (See Attachment 1) and the Zoning Plans (See Attachment 8) for the proposed telecommunications facility include a discussion and design for the antennas, the visual impact, color, landscaping and safety. No exterior lighting is proposed for this facility. 4. A statement from the applicant that the request complies with the Federal Aviation Administration that the application has not been found to be a hazard to air navigation. AT&T Response: The FAA TOWAIR Determination Report is included as Attachment 5. 5. A statement from the applicant that the request complies with the regulations of the Federal Communications Commission, including requirements on radio frequency emissions, or a statement that no such compliance is necessary. AT&T Response: The proposed facility will comply with all FCC requirements for emissions. The statement of compliance with FCC requirements is included in Attachment 4. 6. A statement from the applicant that the proposed use will not interfere with the County of Hawaii public safety radio system. AT&T Response: The proposedfacility will not interfere with the County of Hawaii Public Safety Radio System. (See Attachment 4 MPE report). 7. A statement from the applicant that space on the tower for co -location of antennas or attachments will be made available to other providers, if this can be done without substantial interference to the applicant' s use of the tower. If you are an infrastructure company, a commitment from a minimum of two service providers shall be identified in the application. AT&T Response: Space on the tower will be made available for other qualified providers for colocation if it can be done without substantial interference to ATT&T's use of this tower. 8. A statement from the applicant that diligent, but unsuccessful efforts to install or co - locate the applicant' s telecommunication antennas on existing towers or feasible antenna support structures have been made. Identify those sites that you have investigated and explain how those sites are inadequate and how the site selected is the least obtrusive. AT&T Response: There ore no existing telecommunications facilities available for collocation that offer coverage along Pahoa-Kalapana Road, south of Leilani Estates. SBA Towers has a 150 foot tower in Nanowale Estates and Verizon hos a 150 -foot tower in Leilani Estates that are approximately 5 miles and 2.4 miles, respectively, from the proposed subject property and Facility. These facilities are outside the search ring and would not provide satisfactory coverage required for FirstNet along Pahoa-Kalapana Road and the Kalapana community. See Attachment 3 RF Justification). 9. Provide justification for the height of the proposed tower by including propagation maps for the coverage area at proposed the height and at a lower height if the proposed tower is more than 100 -feet tall. If the site involves increasing the height of an existing tower, provide propagation maps to show analysis of signal quality at the existing and proposed height. AT&T Response: Propagation maps showing coverage from a 50 -foot tower and a 100 -foot tower are included in Attachment 3 RF Justification. The background and justification for design and development of this proposed site also is included in the RF Justification (See Attachment 3). 10. Have you met with adjacent landowners and/ or community regarding the development? Provide information regarding those meetings. AT&T Response: All adjacent landowners owners within a radius of .25 miles will be consulted pursuant to this application process. Information regarding and answers to frequently asked questions were included in direct mailings to the community within .25 miles of the facility. Please see Section 2.3.7—Community Engagement included in Attachment 1— Project Narrative. The list ofproperty owners and copies of information supplied to them is included in Attachment 9. STATE LAND USE CHAPTER 205, HRS and CHAPTER 226-10.5, HRS Chapter 205-4.5 HRS, Permissible uses within the state agricultural district. C) Within the agriculture district, all lands with soil classified by the land study bureau's detailed land classification as overall (master) productivity rating class C, D, E, or U shall be restricted to the uses permitted for agricultural districts as set forth in section 205-5(b). Chapter 205-5 (b) HRS Zoning. Within the agricultural districts, uses compatible to the activities described in section 205-2 as determined by the commission shall be permitted; provided that accessory agricultural uses and services described in sections 205-2 and 205-4.5 may be further defined by each county by zoning ordinance. AT&T Response: The proposed subject property is classified as "D" and "E" by Land Study Bureau. Permitted uses on this agricultural land are defined by the County of Hawaii Sec. 25- 2-61 Applicability. The Hawaii County zoning for the subject property is A -20a. The proposed Facility is a wireless communication antenna that is allowed with a Use Permit. Chapter 226-10.5 HRS, Objectives and policies for the economy -information industry. a) Planning for the State's economy with regard to the information industry shall be directed toward the achievement of the objective of positioning Hawaii as the leading dealer in information businesses and services in the Pacific Rim. J b) To achieve the information industry objective, it shall be the policy of this State to: 1) Encourage the continued development and expansion of the telecommunications infrastructure serving Hawaii to accommodate future growth in the information industry; 2) Facilitate the development of new business and service ventures in the information industry which will provide employment opportunities for the people of Hawaii; 3) Encourage greater cooperation between the public and private sectors in developing and maintaining a well- designed information industry; 4) Ensure that the development of new businesses and services in the industry are in keeping with the social, economic, and physical needs and aspirations of Hawaii's people; 5) Provide opportunities for Hawaii's people to obtain job training and education that will allow for upward mobility within the information industry; 6) Foster a recognition of the contribution of the information industry to Hawaii's economy; and 7) Assist in the promotion of Hawaii as a broker, creator, and processor of information In the Pacific. 8) Foster a recognition of the contribution of the information industry to Hawaii's economy; and 9) Assist in the promotion of Hawaii as a broker, creator, and processor of information in the Pacific. 17) Construction and operation of wireless communication antennas; AT&T Response: The proposed Facility would continue the development of telecommunications infrastructure, promote information technology businesses and services, and the overall growth of the information industry in Hawaii. The proposed project is in conformance with the goals, objectives and policies of Chapter226, HRS, Hawaii State Planning Act, the Hawaii State Plan, as noted above. STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND TOURISM HAWAII REVISED STATUES (HRS) CHAPTER 15-15-95, LAND USE COMMISSION RULES Chapter 15-15-95 Land Use Commission Rules Petition before county planning commission Any person who desires to use land within an agricultural or rural district for other than a a) permissible agricultural or rural use may petition the county planning commission of the county within which the land is located for a special permit. AT&T Response: The subject property is in the State Agricultural District. The proposed use is consistent with the State Ag designation of the property. The proposed Facility is in conformance with the above Land Use Commission Rules. J C Attachment 3—AT&T RF Justification AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application C at& t HIL03 Leilani Estates Coverage Justification OVERVIEW AT& T is proposing to build a new wireless communication facility (" WCF" or ' facility"), AT& T site HIL03345 Leilani Estates, at 13- 3820 Pahoa- Kalapana Road, Pahoa HI 96778 in the County of Hawaii. This proposed Facility meets AT& T' s service objectives ( providing outdoor, in - vehicle, and in - building wireless coverage) by filling a gap in AT& T' s 4G LTE network coverage experienced by its customers in Kamaili Homesteads, Kalapana, and areas south of Pahoa and along Pahoa- Kalapana Road. The Facility also meets AT& T' s objective to provide expanded FirstNet coverage for first responders. AT& T has determined a need for service in this geographic area through a combined analysis of market demand, service requests, radio frequency engineering design, and input from public safety officials. In addition to expanding the 4G ITE network, this site will also expand AT& T' s 56 network in support of the next generation of wireless technology. 0 n AT& T is upgrading and expanding its wireless communications network to support the latest 56 and 4G LTE technology. 56 and 4G stand for " 5th Generation" and " 4th Generation" and LTE stands for " Long Term Evolution." These acronyms refer to the ongoing process of improving wireless technology standards, which is now in its 5th generation. With each generation comes improvement in speed and functionality - 4G LTE offers speeds up to ten times faster than 36 and 56 offers speeds up to 1 - gigabit per second, This technology is the next step in increasing broadband speeds to meet the demands of uses and the variety of content accessed over mobile networks and is necessary to facilitate capabilities that are being designed into the latest devices l. e. Samsung Galaxy 520, iPhone 12). 55, specifically, is the next generation of wireless technology expected to deliver latency and capacity enhancements that will help enable revolutionary new capabilities for consumers and businesses. There are several components of 56 wireless technology and separate bands of wavelength spectrum used to build a 55 network: Low - band 56. low - band 56 frequencies ( generally below 2GHz) are the oldest cellular ( and TV) frequencies and are being used by AT& T to provide widely - available 5G service in residential, suburban, and rural areas. This is the same spectrum used for 36 and 4G today. The low - band 850MHz 56 frequency is proposed for this Facility. Low - band 55 frequencies are a tradeoff of download speed versus distance and service area— they are slower than the high - band mmwave and mid - band frequencies, but they travel the farthest and can pass through more obstacles to provide a better, more reliable indoor and outdoor signal for a larger service area ( Le., miles, not feet). Coverage Justification - Con' t Mid - band 56, MW - band 56 frequencies ( generally 3. 10GHz) cover most current cellular and WiFi frequencies and provide broader coverage than high - band mm Waves ( typically a half a mile), but with slower speeds. Use of these frequencies is not as prevalent for building a 5G network as much of the bandwidth in this range is currently unavailable. High - band 5G* mmWave. High - band millimeter wave ( mmWave) frequencies ( generally 20- 100GHz) are the new FCC - approved frequencies most associated with 55 service— " 56+" is AT& T' s name for 56 service delivered using high - band mmWave spectrum. AT& T offers an enhanced wireless experience on 56* with mmWave service though with more limited coverage. Results continue to be impressive, with peak download speeds up to 1 gigabit per second ( Gbps) - fast enough to stream 4K movies. High - band mmWave frequencies deliver this unprecedented performance by transmitting a large amount of data more efficiently than 46 LTE, but can only travel short distances (- 1, 000ft), Accordingly, high - band mmWave sites need to be in close proximity to one another and are typically used in dense, high trafficked areas such as urban areas, stadiums/ arenas, airports, manufacturing and healthcare centers, etc. 5G wireless technology & so includes enhanced network radio protocols and other improvements in data transmission that allow the network to more efficiently use the same frequencies currently used today for 46. As noted, AT& T is proposing to deploy low - band 850MHz 56 at this Facility. Upon completion, the Facility will become part of AT& T' s statewide and nationwide communications networks. SEARCH RING AT& T' s radio frequency (" RF") engineers performed an RF engineering study, considering multiple objectives, to determine the approximate site location and antenna height required to fulfill the noted network objectives for the Targeted Service Area, From this study, AT& T' s RF engineers identified a " search ring" area where a wireless facility may be located to provide effective service in the target coverage area. This includes vital coverage under the FirstNet program for First Responders. l 0 Coverage Justification— Con' t COVERAGE OBJECTIVE Figure A— Targeted Search Ring indicates the search ring AT& T' s RF engineers established for this proposed site. A discussion of the methodology AT& T' s RF engineers used to identity the search ring is included at the end of this RF Justification document. Figure 8— Existing AT& T Coverage shows existing AT& T wireless services in the general area of the proposed new site, which demonstrates the current gap in coverage in the targeted service area. The red circle indicates the location of the proposed new WCF. The blue circle indicates the location of existing AT& T WCF sites; coverage from AT& T' s existing WCF sites is shaded in green. As can be seen, there is a coverage gap in all areas not shaded in green. Currently, the target coverage area has minimal to no 4G voice service and does not have adequate 4G LTE service, Figure C— Projected New AT& T Coverage identifies the projected coverage from the proposed new WCF with the requested antenna tip height of 100 ft. The proposed antenna tip height is the minimum necessary to help fill the coverage gap relative to nearby complementary wireless facilities and to support the FirstNet Network. This includes the existing towers at the proposed subject property that do not offer this height. This is also the height where an AT& T wireless device can be reliably used to make and receive telephone calls and use data service in the presence of varying signals. Figure D— Alternative Site locations shows the location of each alternative site in relation to the proposed new site location. Figure E — Difference in coverage at preferred candidate location shows the reduced coverage area at the zone heights of 50 feet in comparison to the proposed antenna tip height of 100 feet. ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT To meet the above coverage objectives, this proposed site will contain up to 12 panel antenna, 36 RRH u protectors ( together with all associated accessory equipment). 4 surge Figure A— Targeted Search Ring HIL03345 Leilani Estates FirstNet NSB to improve coverage in Leilani Estates and Kalapana areas and on 2 main roads from Pahoa to Kalapana. Also looking to improve coverage in Nanawale Estates area. a- tet G, acek( Nona* Wit ', tams MiL03021 Pahoa 141W0111OC Kalap. n. COW No LTE Best RSRP rRS EPRE) level ( dens) • • - 90 MI Best RSRP tRS EPRE) level ( dBm) • • - 98 Best RSRP ( RS [ PRE) level ( dBm1 • • - 103 Best RSRP IRS ( PRE) level ( d8m) • •. 108 MI best RSRP ( RS EPRE) level ( dem) • •- 113 a- Best RSRP) RS ( PRE) level ( dBm) . •- 116 Best RSRP IRS EPRE) level ( dB' s; • • - 118 NI Best RSRP IRS EPRE) level ( dBml > . - 126 n Figure B— Existing AT& T Coverage Targeted Service Area BEFORE Addition of Proposed New Wireless Facility AO I p f r bc_ ,. Legend ( Coverage Signal) ME Indoor Signal In - Vehicle Signal Outdoor Signal 1 r Figure C— Projected New AT& T Coverage Coverage AFTER Proposed AT& T Facility On - Air - 100 ft Antenna Tip Height A r. Legend ( Coverage Signal) Indoor Signal In - Vehicle Signal Outdoor Signal i ( 1 n Alternative Site Analysis AT& T considers all siting possibilities within, and adjacent to, a search ring to determine the best location for a new facility to meet AT& T' s service objectives for the Targeted Service Area, AT& T will first attempt to utilize an existing tower or structure for collocation at the desired antenna height. If an existing tower or structure is not available or determined to be infeasible, AT& T will then propose a new tower. For this proposed Facility, AT& T' s construction and real estate group, with the assistance of outside consultants, thoroughly analyzed all siting options and requirements, as outlined below, and did not identify any available and/ or feasible alternative locations within the search ring to locate the proposed new Facility. AT& T' s RE engineers evaluated two alternative site locations within the targeted search ring as possible locations for the proposed new WCF. The existing 150ft SBA tower in Nanawele Estates and the 150ft Verizon tower in Leilani Estates are too far outside the search ring to provide required coverage in the targeted service area. Figure D— Alternative Site Locations shows the location of each alternative site in relation to the proposed new site location. Alternative Site Nt laza Property, 13- 3861 Pahoa- Kalapana Road: Raw Land build with private landowner located approximately 0. 3 miles south from the proposed new tower location, This site Is approximately 990 feet msl while the proposed location is approximately 1, 045 feet msl. This alternative location was not selected because the proposed location would provide superior coverage at the increased elevation. Alternative Site # 2 Melim Property, 13- 3461 Pahoa- Kalapana Road: Raw Land build with private landowner located approximately 0. 5 miles north from the proposed new tower location. This site was not selected because it is farther north than the proposed location and would not cover as much of the Pahao- Kalapana Highway south toward Kalapana. w SBATower 7 a) O N0 HIL03345ProposedCand Justification for Height and Figure E AT& T is proposing a tower height of 100 ft. This is the minimum height needed to achieve the coverage objective of providing new FirstNet coverage as extensively as possible with this site to reach into the surrounding areas and to extend service from Leilani Estates toward Kalapana. Figure E below — Preferred Candidate at varying Antenna Tip Height shows the greatly reduced coverage at the zone height of 50 ft. Proposed Candidate — 50 ft Antenna Tip Height Proposed Candidate — 100 ft Antenna Tip Height Search Ring Methodology AT& T' s RF engineers used coverage propagation software systems to predict the coverage provided by the proposed new WCF. The software and AT& T' s RF engineers considered the general factors outlined below, as well as more project - specific factors such as the type of antenna, antenna tilt, etc. Coverage. The antenna site must be located in an area where the radio frequency broadcasts will provide adequate coverage within the targeted service area. The RF engineer must take into consideration the coverage objectives for the site as well as the terrain in and around the area to be covered. Because radio frequency broadcasts travel in a straight line and diminish as they travel further away from the antennas, it is generally best to place an antenna site near the center of the desired coverage area. However, in certain cases, the search ring may be located away from the center of the desired coverage area due to the existing coverage, the surrounding terrain, or other features which might affect the radio frequency broadcasts, e. g. buildings or sources of electrical interference. Clutter. AT& T' s WCFs must " clear the clutter"— the WCF site must be installed above or close to RF obstructions ( the clutter") to enable the RF to extend beyond and clear the clutter. AT& T' s radio frequencies do not penetrate mountains, hills, rocks, or metal, and are diminished by trees, brick and wood walls, and other structures, Accordingly, AT& T' s antennas must be installed above or close to the " clutter" to provide high quality communications services in the desired coverage areas. Additionally, if the local code requires us to accommodate additional carriers on the support structure, the structure must be even taller to also allow the other carders' antennas to dear the clutter. Call Handoff. The WCF site must be in an area where the radio broadcasts from the site will allow seamless " call handoff" with adjacent WCF sites. Call handoff is a feature of a wireless communications system that allows an ongoing telephone conversation to continue uninterrupted as the user travels frorn the coverage area of one antenna site into the coverage area of an adjacent antenna site. This requires coverage overlap for a sufficient distance and/ or period of time to support the mechanism of the call handoff. Quality of Service. Users of wireless communications services want to use their services where they live, work, commute and play, including when they are indoors. AT& T' s coverage objectives include the ability to provide indoor coverage in areas where there are residences, businesses and indoor recreational facilities. Search Ring Methodology-- Con' t Radio Frequencies used by System. The designs of wireless communications systems vary greatly based upon the radio frequencies that are used by the carrier, To ensure service quality, AT& T must knit together its spectrum assets to address customers' existing usage and forecasted demand for wireless services, and it must use its Ignited spectrum in an efficient manner. AT& T uses both low - band ( i. e., 850 MHz and 700 MHz) and high - band ( i. e., 2300 MHz, 21. 00 MHz and 1900 MHz) spectrum to provide wireless service. Each spectrum band has different propagation characteristics and signal quality may vary due to noise or interference based on network characteristics at a given location. To address this dynamic environment, AT& T deploys multiple layers of its licensed spectrum and strives to dose the gap in LTE service coverage. Land Use Classifications. A& T' s ability to construct a WCF site on any particular property is affected by state and local regulations, including zoning and comprehensive plan classifications, goals, and policies. AT& T' s search rings take these laws and regulations into consideration. at&t October 13, 2020 Michael Yee, Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department RE: Use Permit Application New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC dLa AT&T Mobility Re: AT&T's Radio Frequency (RF) Engineering Justification for the Proposed Wireless Communications Facility in Hawaii County: HIL03345 Leilani Estates at 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD, PAHOA, HI 96778 TMK: (3)1-3-001:007 To Whom It May Concern, Enclosed please find the RF Justification document prepared for AT&T's proposed new wireless communications facility at the above noted location. This letter serves as my verification, to the best of my knowledge, of the accuracy of the RF information, propagation maps, and analysis provided in the attached RF Justification. Thank you for your consideration of this information. Sincerely, fr. ilah4Ita Cheryl Lyn Nakata RAN Design Engineer, Hawaii market AT&T Mobility Attachment 4—AT&T MPE Report AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application SiteSafe A 1...41_707 -Company 8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 315, Vienna, VA 22182 703.276.1 100 • 703.276.1 169 fax info?'sitesafe.com • www.sitesafe.com J5 Infrastructure on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC Site FA - 10553982 Site ID - H I L03345 USID - 270875 Site Name - HIL03345 LEILANI ESTATES NEW MRSDL021465 13-3820 PAHOA-KALAPANA ROAD PAHOA, HI 96778 Latitude: N19-26-23.70 Longitude: W 154-56-42.00 Structure Type: Monopole Report generated date: October 15, 2020 Report by: Scott Broyles Customer Contact: Charlene Mitsuda AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. Sitesafe logo is a registered trademark of Site Safe, LLC. All rights reserved. AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. ?.7019 AT&T Intellectual property. Al rights reserved. SiteSafe Table of Contents 1 GENERAL SITE SUMMARY 3 1.1 REPORT SUMMARY 3 1.2 FALL ARREST ANCHOR POINT SUMMARY 3 1.3 SIGNAGE SUMMARY 4 2 SCALE MAPS OF SITE 5 3 ANTENNA INVENTORY 7 4 EMISSION PREDICTIONS 9 5 SITE COMPLIANCE 12 5.1 SITE COMPLIANCE STATEMENT 12 5.2 ACTIONS FOR SITE COMPLIANCE 12 6 REVIEWER CERTIFICATION 13 APPENDIX A - STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS 14 APPENDIX B - REGULATORY BACKGROUND INFORMATION 15 FCC RULES AND REGULATIONS 15 OSHA STATEMENT 1 6 APPENDIX C - SAFETY PLAN AND PROCEDURES 17 APPENDIX D - RF EMISSIONS 18 APPENDIX E -ASSUMPTIONS AND DEFINITIONS 19 GENERAL MODEL ASSUMPTIONS 19 USE OF GENERIC ANTENNAS 19 APPENDIX F - DEFINITIONS 20 APPENDIX G - REFERENCES 22 opavi ,o!u.a»,l. 1,oruse <.*dem*ate.maMIT .arMSa...cemundo. .l,a,.a.e vmIrATV,. dptepatif. y401t„.,.Md. Page 1 General Site Summary 1.1 Report Summary ase SiteSafe 4fl,r k F AT&T Mobility, LLC Summary Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level at the Antenna level 11,423.4% General Public Limit 1" in front of AT&T Mobility, LLC's Alpha Sector Antenna 1 Max Cumulative Simulated RFE Level on the Ground 1% General Public Limit Compliant per FCC Rules and Regulations? Will Be Compliant Compliant per AT&T Mobility, LLC's Policy? Yes The following documents were provided by the client and were utilized to create this report: RFDS: 10553982 MRHI1000065 6C 5C 4C 3C 2C_HIL03345 LEILANI ESTATES_PM201 RFDS ABIP_08-16-2019_As-Built-In-Progress_v 1.00 CD's: 14101 1_HIL03345_MRSDL021465_New Build LTE Only 1 C_100%ZD_REV1_08-27-2019 RF Powers Used: AT&T Max RRU Powers 1.2 Fall Arrest Anchor Point Summary Fall Arrest Anchor & Parapet Info Parapet Available Y/N) Parapet Height inches) Fall Arrest Anchor Available (Y/N) Roof Safety Info N N/A N AT&T Proprietary (Internal use only). Not la use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under written agreement. V2019 ATLT InteNectucl property. Al riphh reserved. Page 3 SitMafiB 4 (--,, . r,mF.vsn.- 1.3 Signage Summary a Pre -Site Visit AT&T Si b. Proposed AT&T Signage 1 INIONNEMME II'. Oft 01 AT&T AT&T ro ' a,. ojo., i A A. Signage Signage n Locations s .y Locations Information 1 Information 2 Notice 2 Notice 2 Information 1 Information 2 Notice Caution Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 BarriersAccess Point(s) Alpha Alpha Beta Beta Gamma Gamma Delta Delta Epsilon Epsilon b. Proposed AT&T Signage ATET Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the ATNT companies, except under written agreement. r.2O19 ATV Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 AT&T ro ' a,. io.` i A A. Signage n Locations Information 1 Information 2 Notice Notice 2 Ccufion Caution 2 Warning Warning 2 Barriers Access Point(s) Alpha Beta Gamma Delta Epsilon ATET Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the ATNT companies, except under written agreement. r.2O19 ATV Intellectual property. All rights reserved. Page 4 Si SiteSafe 2 Scale Maps of Site The following diagrams are included: Site Scale Map RF Exposure Diagram RF Exposure Diagram - Elevation View T. OIXIdOrY Ofllemol int only) ..eriaaatacknure Mike •,.mcampaign ..t.w.Se.,m.a a, ~WO Page 5 19 AIM 1 Site Scale Map For: HIL03345 LEILANI ESTATES NEW 1111 IIIIIIIIIII NIL mom u ma__ u uaauii_ au am rmum a ma A H : ; T III MONOPpIE 1111111 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111211! aa__ ma 111111__•u M a a Ar 111R2.-1 ACCESS ROAD 11116.141)1 ATEMNIIMMI U jMil ISM O IIIIMUIIIIIIIIII 1111111111 a r IMIIIIIMI s4Q 44 MI 111 n 1111111111111/ 11111111111IN r rr r III MAI= 1111111111111111 Feet) ane. Idenunradon aKi uoxnu•nc .rwnr wane 0,u,wu 0-. 0or.rcnw..wu- utn legend 1 38.3 76.7 10/15/2020 8:29:41 AM q) A ® . 0irbMme.) 4or:n- A. l o) .. — Ea4eing Balder P'"°O'ad E- Rome. sign XSign BiteMe fe -- r7.. 3 Antenna Inventory The following antenna inventory was obtained by the customer and was utilized to create the site model diagrams: Ant ID Operator Antenna Make i Model Type TX FreqMHz) Technology AzDeg) Hof BWDeg) AntLenIt) Power PowerType PowerUnit MlscLoss TX Count Total ERPWatts) Ant GaindBd) ZAGL MDT EDT 1 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 737 LTE 30 73. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 3541 13. 45 92' 0° 3° 1 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 1900 LTE 30 62. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 5001. 7 14. 95 92' 0° 3° 1 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2300 LTE 30 58. 0 8 100 TPO Watt 0 1 3845. 9 15. 85 92' 0° 2° 1 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 850 LTE 30 72. 0 8 80 TPO Watt 0 1 1853. 9 13. 65 92' 0° 3° 1 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 850 5G 30 72. 0 8 80 TPO Watt 0 1 1853. 9 13. 65 92' 0° 3° 2 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2100 LTE/ AWS- 1 30 62. 0 8 120 TPO Watt 0 1 4113. 2 15. 35 92' 0° 2° 2 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2100 LTE/ AWS- 3 30 62. 0 8 120 TPO Watt 0 1 4113. 2 15. 35 92' 0° 2° 2 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 763 LTE 30 73. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 3541 13. 45 92' 0° 3° 3 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Future) Generic Panel 1900 LTE 30 65. 0 6. 3 0 TPO Watt 0 1 0 16. 26 92. 9' 0° 0° 4 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 737 LTE 90 73. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 3541 13. 45 97 0° 5° 4 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 1900 LTE 90 62. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 5001. 7 14. 95 92' 0° 3° 4 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2300 LTE 90 58. 0 8 100 TPO Watt 0 1 3845. 9 15. 85 92' 0° 3° 4 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 850 LTE 90 72. 0 8 80 TPO Watt 0 1 1853. 9 13. 65 92' 0° 5° 4 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 850 5G 90 72. 0 8 80 TPO Wott 0 1 1853. 9 13. 65 97 0° 5° 5 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - v3 Panel 2100 LTE/ AWS- 1 90 62. 0 8 120 TPO Watt 0 1 4113. 2 15. 35 92' 0° 3° 5 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2100 LTE/ AWS- 3 90 62. 0 8 120 TPO Watt 0 1 4113. 2 15. 35 92' 0° 3° 5 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 763 LTE 90 73. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 3541 13. 45 92' 0° 5° 6 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Future) Generic Panel 1900 LTE 90 65. 0 6. 3 0 TPO Watt 0 1 0 16. 26 92. 9' 0° 0° AT& T Ilopeelwl ( Ytwnal tee only} NW Ter use w decbsure Walde the AT& T companies. except under +. Slsn ogreemere. 02015 AT& T lreaeecAral properly . AA rights reser+ ed. Page 7 SitaSafe caf, lr, x Ant ID Operator Antenna Make & Model Type TX FreqMHz) Technology AzDeg) Hor BW Deg) AntLenff) Power PowerType PowerUnit MiscLoss TX Count Total ERPWatts) Ant GaindBd) 7AGL MDT EDT 7 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 737 LTE 170 73. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 3541 13. 45 92' 2° 3° 7 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 1900 LTE 170 62. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 5001. 7 14. 95 92' 2° 2° 7 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2300 LTE 170 58. 0 8 100 TPO Watt 0 1 3845. 9 15. 85 92' 2° 2° 7 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 850 LTE 170 72. 0 8 80 TPO Watt 0 1 1853. 9 13. 65 92' 2° 3° 7 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 850 5G 170 72. 0 8 80 TPO Watt 0 1 1853. 9 13. 65 92' 2° 3° 8 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2100 LTE/ AWS- 1 170 62. 0 8 120 TPO Watt 0 1 4113. 2 15. 35 92' 2° 2° 8 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2100 LTE/ AWS- 3 170 62. 0 8 120 TPO Watt 0 1 4113. 2 15. 35 92' 2° 2° 8 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 763 LTE 170 73. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 3541 13. 45 92' 2° 3° 9 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Future) Generic Panel 1900 LTE 170 65. 0 6. 3 0 TPO Watt 0 1 0 16. 26 92. 9' 0° 0° 10 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 737 LTE 230 73. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 3541 13. 45 92' 0° 2° 10 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 1900 LTE 230 62. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 5001. 7 14. 95 92' 0° 1° 10 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2300 LTE 230 58. 0 8 100 TPO Watt 0 1 3845. 9 15. 85 92' 0° 1° 10 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 850 LTE 230 72, 0 8 80 TPO Watt 0 1 1853. 9 13. 65 92' 0° 2° 10 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 850 5G 230 72. 0 8 80 TPO Watt 0 1 1853. 9 13. 65 92' 0° 2° 11 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - v3 Panel 2100 LTE/ AWS- 1 230 62. 0 8 120 TPO Watt 0 1 4113. 2 15. 35 92' 0° 1° 11 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 2100 LTE/ AWS- 3 230 62. 0 8 120 TPO Watt 0 1 4113. 2 15. 35 92' 0° 1° 11 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Commscope NNH4- 65C - R6 - V3 Panel 763 LTE 230 73. 0 8 160 TPO Watt 0 1 3541 13. 45 92' 0° 2° 12 AT& T MOBILITY LLC Future) Generic Panel 1900 LTE 230 65. 0 6. 3 0 TPO Watt 0 1 0 16. 26 92. 9' 0° 0° Note: The Z reference indicates the bottom of the antenna height above the ground level unless otherwise indicated. Effective Radiated Power ( ERP) is provided by the operator or based on Sitesafe experience. The values used in the modeling may be greater than are currently deployed. AT& T Proprietory ( Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure ouMde the AT& T companies, except under written agreement. 02019 AT& T inte0ectual property. NI rights reserved. Pap. R SiteBafe A 62,02,W Company 4 Emission Predictions In the RF Exposure Simulations below all heights are reflected with respect to main site level. In most rooftop cases this is the height of the main rooftop and in other cases this can be ground level. Each different height area, rooftop, or platform level is labeled with its height relative to the main site level. Emissions are calculated appropriately based on the relative height and location of that area to all antennas. The total analyzed elevations in the below RF Exposure Simulations are listed below. Ground = 0' AT&T Equip = 10' AGL The Antenna Inventory heights are referenced to the same level. Alit Proprietary (Internal use only). Not for use or disclosure outside the AT&T companies, except under wrttten agreement. x^2019 AT&T Intellectual properly. A& rights reserved. Page 9 RF Exposure Simulation For: HIL03345 LEILANI ESTATES NEW Composite View 111111111111111111111111 MI IIIIIIIIIIII1111111111111111111.11111111111011111111111,111111111111111111 1111111111111111111MEM11111111 1111111111111111111.11111111 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1111111111111111111111011111 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 UuIpuRIIUuRRmi MONOPOLE = 100' AGE. AT&T EQUIP = 1 AGL IMO MI MI MI Ell Feet) I I I 0 33.2 66.3 www.sitesafe.com 10/15/2020 8:36:57 AM of FCC Public Exposure Limit Spatially Averaged 0-5 or FCC P.blk Expowre link 5.100 100-500 SOC 47::78 .doniarMdwmiu • vtxuon wwuss Q vnnvi Existing BenMr 5000+ ROPgedBerrien/Sign — Remove Sian X OUNIt Nca IIFM le,e.dr.ee. Sltesafe OEr-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.5 • Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Spatially Averaged RF Exposure Simulation For: HIL03345 LEILANI ESTATES NEW Elevation View IMO MEMO IMMOMMIMOMMEMMOM MMEMINIMEMMOMMIMMEMENIMEM MM. IMMEMM .INI..... 11111. MEMONI.. ....... MMINIMMEMMOMEMINIMMIMMINIMMOM INIMMMEIMMOIMMEMMEMMINIMMINIM MEINIMMEMOMMOMMEMOMMEMOMMOM MUMMOOMMINIMINIMMUMINIMMIMMUM UinM IEUM NININ$UIUU....II MUMMINIMMEMNIMMEINIMMEM UUU N UUU UU.... IuM tE ), r iso:, "x ;• 1.. ,, L .,(. , r, MONOPOLE= 100' AGL AT&T CENTERLINE = 96' AGL ((II it h li) U UTILITY POLE 1 AT&T EQUIP MI MINIMMINOMMIMMM MINIMMINIMMOMMINIMMIMMIMMIMMME MMEMMINIMM IIMMOMMINIMMOMMUMIMRMMEIMINIMMEMMEOM Feet) 1 I 1 0 37.1 74.2 www.sitesafe.com 10/15/2020 8:47:31 AM of FCC Public Exposure Limit o1 FCC Publk hpo,o . Link 0-5 5-100 100-500 500-5000 5000+ WITTil- MEM Card., IdaMlflc. ion mumown, RC • V1111701•4WMMIt%S • T-MOB.l O 51...11 Borriel/Sign— — — Remove Sips X 0 Sitesafe OET-65 Model Near Field Boundary: 1.5 Aperture Reflection Factor: 1 Single Level (0) SitteSafet 5 Site Compliance 5.1 Site Compliance Statement Upon evaluation of the cumulative RE emission levels from all operators at this site, RF hazard signage and antenna locations. Sitesate has determined that: AT&T Mobility, LLC will be compliant when the remediation recommended in Section 5.2 or other appropriate remediation is implemented. The compliance determination is based on Genera! Public RFE levels derived from theoretical modeling, RF signage placement, proposed antenna inventory and the level of restricted access to the antennas at the site. Any deviation from the AT&T Mobility, LLC's proposed deployment plan could result in the site being rendered non-compliant. Modeling is used for determining compliance and the percentage of MPE contribution. 5.2 Actions tor Site Compliance Based on FCC regulations, common industry practice, end our understanding of AT&T Mobility, LLC RF Safety Policy requirements, this section provides a statement of recommendations for site compliance. Recommendations have been proposed based on our understanding of existing access restrictions, signage. and an analysis of predicted RFE levels. AT&T Mobility. LLC will be made compliant if the following changes are impiemen}ed: Monopole Access Location 1) Yellow Caution 2B sign (s) required. Notes: Any existing signage that conflicts with the proposed signage in this report should be removed per AT&T Signage Posting Rules. Areas where the predicted RF emission levet is above 5000% Genera! Public MPE level are located within the near field of the antennas and are restricted by the antenna mounts. Thus, Caution 2 signs are sufficient. nnr»mxwrOMSmag. am. asHe.. e< ax=w.e*Mde m. nm. M.t, e.e.p.eae .,m.ewe=m*,l.. G2ol9.10 !,lawin.a.a+.,«e.et Page 12 tS} SiteSafe 6 Reviewer Certification The reviewer whose signature appears below hereby certifies and affirms: That I am an employee of Site Safe, LLC, in Vienna, Virginia, at which place the staff and I provide RF compliance services to clients in the wireless communications industry; and That I am thoroughly familiar with the Rules and Regulations of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) as well as the regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), both in general and specifically as they apply to the FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields; and That I have thoroughly reviewed this Site Compliance Report and believe it to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge as assembled by and attested to by Scott Broyles. October 15, 2020 Young Min Kim AT&Trr ielopy (interned ,.< *y)NO1101 Use a dcw,e .wade the AT&Tcompanies. enrol under '^.hs.(Vernet Page 13 se SiteSafe Appendix A - Statement of Limiting Conditions Sitesafe has provided computer generated model(s) in this Site Compliance Report to show approximate dimensions of the site, and the model is included to assist the reader of the compliance report to visualize the site area, and to provide supporting documentation for Sitesafe's recommendations. Sitesafe may note in the Site Compliance Report any adverse physical conditions, such as needed repairs, that Sitesafe became aware of during the normal research involved in creating this report. Sitesafe will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because Sitesafe is not an expert in the field of mechanical engineering or building maintenance, the Site Compliance Report must not be considered a structural or physical engineering report. Sitesafe obtained information used in this Site Compliance Report from sources that Sitesafe considers reliable and believes them to be true and correct. Sitesafe does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. When conflicts in information occur between data collected by Sitesafe provided by a second party and data collected by Sitesafe, the data will be used. AIM Petendvry peened en rely) . Avi ler .. a Sieben. de Arewm..,d rexce..e.ernereleArty'Selected property m •... right.,.. Page 14 SiteSafe Appendix B - Regulatory Background Information FCC Rules and Regulations in 1996, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) adopted regulations for the evaluating of the effects of RF emissions in 47 CFR § 1.1307 and 1.1310. The guideline from the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology is Bulletin 65 ("OET Bulletin 65"), Evaluating Compliance wilh FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Edition 97-01, published August 1997. Since 1996 the FCC periodically reviews these rules and regulafions as per their congressional mandate. FCC regulations define two separate tiers of exposure limits: Occupational or Controlled environment" and General Public or "Uncontrolled environment". The General Public limits ore generally five times more conservative or restrictive than the Occupational limit. These limits apply fo accessible areas where workers or the general public may be exposed to Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic fields. Occupational or Controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and where those persons exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure, An area is considered a Controlled environment when access is limited to these aware personnel. Typical criteria are restricted access (i.e. locked or alarmed doors, barriers, etc.) to the areas where antennas are located coupled with proper RF warning signage. A site with Controlled environments is evaluated with Occupational limits. All other areas are considered Uncontrolled environments. If a site has no access controls or no RF warning signage it is evaluated with General Public limits. The theoretical modeling of the RF electromagnetic fields has been performed in accordance with OET Bulletin 65. The Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits utilized in this analysis are outlined in the following diagram: FCC Limits for Maximum PermIssibie Exposure (MPE) Mane -wave figWVYmY Power Doan 1000 100 EE 0 10 — 0.1 — Y,flpalonaiGeneralPubllcl 0.01 0 1 10 100 Frequency1MHz) 1,000 10.000 n. nonWIw(memo use ewr). .1.11re ..« dsaitn owe roe AT&T li$ e. Mom ,d(wnne 091•40"1 Page 15 Cg SiteSelf a Limits for Occupational/Controlled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time( E 12, Range Field Field Density (S) ( WP or 5 (minutes) MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cm)) V/m) (H)(Wm) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)* 6 30-30 1842/f 4.89/f (900/f2)" 6 30-3(x1 61.4 0.163 1A 6 300-1500 -- - f/300 6 1500- -- - 5 6 10Q000 Limits for General Population/Uncontrolled Exposure (MPE) Frequency Electric Magnetic Power Averaging Time l EV, Range Field Field Density VS) INV or S (minutes) MHz) Strength (E) Strength (mW/cmrl V/m) (H)(A/m) 0.3-134 614 1.63 (100)e 30 1.34-30 824ft 2.19/f (180/£2)' 30 30-300 27.5 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- - f/1500 30 1500- - -- 1.0 30 100,000 f= frequency in MHz 'Plane -wave equivalent power density OSHA Statement The General Duty clause of the OSHA Act (Section 5) outlines the occupational safety and health responsibilities of the employer and employee. The General Duty clause in Section 5 states: a) Eachemployer- 1) shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are cousing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees; 2) shall comply with occupational safety and health standards promulgated under this Act. b) Each employee shall comply with occupational safety and health standards and all rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to this Act which are applicable to his own actions and conduct. OSHA has defined Radiofrequency and Microwave Radiation safety standards for workers who may enter hazardous RF areas. Regulation Standards 29 CFR g 1910.147 identify a generic Lockout/Tagout procedure aimed to control the unexpected energization or startup of machines when maintenance or service is being performed. AN<N nwMMY Uu.md ..e GOO . Net wa ucmva wwa. me Ani cm Paalm .ueNt..la *ten agreermd. "0N t Mr Inkreebd wwnh a rvM,e!n ed, Page 16 S) SiteSafe Appendix C - Safety Plan and Procedures The following items are general safety recommendations that should be administered on a site by site basis as needed by the carrier. General Maintenance Work: Any maintenance personnel required to work immediately in front of antennas and / or in areas indicated as above 100% of the Occupational MPE limits should coordinate with the wireless operators to disable transmitters during their work activities. Training and Qualification Verification: All personnel accessing areas indicated as exceeding the General Population MPE limits should have a basic understanding of EME awareness and RF Safety procedures when working around transmitting antennas. Awareness training increases a worker's understanding to potential RF exposure scenarios. Awareness can be achieved in a number of ways e.g. videos, formal classroom lecture or internet-based courses). Physical Access Control: Access restrictions to transmitting antennas locations is the primary element in a site safety plan. Examples of access restrictions are as follows: Locked door or gate Alarmed door Locked ladder access Restrictive Barrier at antenna (e.g. Chain link with posted RF Sign) RF Signage: Everyone should obey all posted signs at all times. RF signs play an important role in properly warning a worker prior to entering into a potential RF Exposure area. Assume all antennas are active: Due to the nature of telecommunications transmissions, an antenna transmits intermittently. Always assume an antenna is transmitting. Never stop in front of an antenna. If you have to pass by an antenna, move through as quickly and safely as possible thereby reducing any exposure to a minimum. Maintain a 3 foot clearance from all antennas: There is a direct correlation between the strength of an EME field and the distance from the transmitting antenna. The further away from an antenna, the lower the corresponding EME field is. Site RF Emissions Diagram: Section 4 of this report contains an RF Diagram that outlines various theoretical Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) areas at the site. The modeling is a worst-case scenario assuming a duty cycle of 100% for each transmitting antenna at full power. This analysis is based on one of two access control criteria: General Public criteria means the access to the site is uncontrolled and anyone can gain access. Occupational criteria means the access is restricted and only properly trained individuals can gain access to the antenna locations. AT&T oma.(mora .. Only) . N& b use w«.nw,.aa•a. me AT&T =Input ._.« ung. ....,ay. t,emIr AT&T^ Page 17 duo SiteSafe Appendix D - RF Emissions The RF Emissions Simulation(s) in this report display theoretical spatially averaged percentage of the Maximum Permissible Exposure for all systems at the site unless otherwise noted. These diagrams use modeling as prescribed in OET Bulletin 65 and assumptions detailed in Appendix E. The key at the bottom of each RF Emissions Simulation indicates percentages displayed referenced to FCC General Public Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) limits. Color coding on the diagram is as follows: Areas indicated as Gray are predicted to be below 5% of the MPE limits. Gray represents areas more than 20 times below the most conservative exposure limit. Gray areas are accessible to anyone. Green represents areas are predicted to be between 5% and 100% of the MPE limits. Green areas are accessible to anyone. Blue represents areas predicted to exceed the General Public MPE limits but are less than Occupational limits. Blue areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers. Yellow represents areas predicted to exceed Occupational MPE limits. Yellow areas should be accessible only to RF trained workers able to assess current exposure levels. Red represents areas predicted to have exposure more than 10 times the Occupational MPE limits. Red indicates that the RF levels must be reduced prior to access. An RF Safety Plan is required which outlines how to reduce the RF energy in these areas prior to access. If trained occupational personnel require access to areas that are delineated as above 100% of the limit, Sitesafe recommends that they utilize the proper personal protection equipment (RF monitors), coordinate with the carders to reduce or shutdown power, or make real-time power density measurements with the appropriate power density meter to determine real-time MPE levels. This will allow the personnel to ensure that their work area is within exposure limits. AT&T rwpieren Omw..n ane only) - Not kw use or mcim... w]wn. Me MIT companies, except under written nve. e•r. saoi u •cac INmecmS peony. Al nem• reserved_ Page 18 S) Site'Safe Appendix E — Assumptions and Definitions General Model Assumptions In this site compliance report, if is assumed that all antennas are operating at full power at all times. Software modeling was performed for all transmitting antennas located on the site. Sitesafe has further assumed a 100% duty cycle and maximum radiated power. The modeling is based on recommendations from the FCC's OET-65 bulletin with the following variances per AT&T guidance. Reflection has not been considered in the modeling, i.e. the reflection factor is 1.0. The near / far field boundary has been set to 1.5 times the aperture height of the antenna and modeling beyond that point is the lesser of the near field cylindrical model and the far field model taking into account the gain of the antenna. The site has been modeled with these assumptions to show the maximum RF energy density. Areas modeled with exposure greater than 100% of the General Public MPE level may not actually occur but are shown as a prediction that could be realized. Sitesafe believes these areas to be safe for entry by occupationally trained personnel utilizing appropriate personal protective equipment (in most cases, a personal monitor). Use of Generic Antennas For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model, or "Unknown" for an operator means the information about a carrier, their FCC license and/or antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use our industry specific knowledge of equipment, antenna models, and transmit power to model the site. If more specific information can be obtained for the unknown measurement criteria, Sitesafe recommends remodeling of the site utilizing the more complete and accurate data. Information about similar facilities is used when the service is identified and associated with a particular antenna. If no information is available regarding the transmitting service associated with an unidentified antenna, using the antenna manufacturer's published data regarding the antenna's physical characteristics makes more conservative assumptions. Where the frequency is unknown, Sitesafe uses the closest frequency in the antenna's range that corresponds to the highest Maximum Permissible Exposure IMPE), resulting in a conservative analysis. Aar P.,.xiwnmmncd use GOO .a a use wa.b.w. outside iM nnT= M....t.w.baw,m.nea...T.L.02UI9<,., iM Page 19 A SiteSafe Appendix F - Definitions 5% Rule - The rules adopted by the FCC specify that, in general, at multiple transmitter sites actions necessary to bring the area into compliance with the guidelines are the shared responsibility of all licensees whose transmitters produce field strengths or power density levels at the area in question in excess of 5% of the exposure limits. In other words, any wireless operator that contributes 5% or greater of the MPE limit in an area that is identified to be greater than 100% of the MPE limit is responsible for taking corrective actions to bring the site into compliance. Compliance -The determination of whether a site complies with FCC standards with regards to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields from transmitting antennas. Decibel (dB) - A unit for measuring power or strength of a signal. Duly Cycle - The percent of pulse duration to the pulse period of a periodic pulse train. Also, may be a measure of the temporal transmission characteristic of an intermittently transmitting RF source such as a paging antenna by dividing average transmission duration by the average period for transmission. A duty cycle of 100%corresponds to continuous operation. Effective (or Equivalent) Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP) - The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to an isotropic antenna. Effective Radiated Power (ERP) -The product of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain in a given direction relative to a half -wave dipole antenna. Gain (of an antenna) - The ratio of the maximum power in a given direction to the maximum power in the same direction from an isotropic radiator. Gain is a measure of the relative efficiency of a directional antenna as compared to an omnidirectional antenna. General Population/Uncontrolled Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are unaware of the potential for exposure and who have no control over their exposure. General Population is also referenced as General Public. Generic Antenna - For the purposes of this report, the use of "Generic" as an antenna model means the antenna information was not provided and could not be obtained while on site. In the event of unknown information, Sitesafe will use its industry specific knowledge of antenna models to select a worst-case scenario antenna to model the site. Isotropic Antenna - An antenna that is completely non -directional. In other words, an antenna that radiates energy equally in all directions. Maximum Measurement - This measurement represents the single largest measurement recorded when performing a spatial average measurement. Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) - The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane -wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with acceptable safety factor. AT&T norInar(inland use onn7. Mrr0w. o, amb.,.e wa.meMIT companies. except under written ov..mem.Cama AT&T imweaurxlr-ungn,eTa ed. Page 20 Safe Occupation&/Confrofed Environment - Defined by the FCC as an area where RF exposure may occur to persons who are aware of the potential for exposure as a condition of employment or specific activity and can exercise control over their exposure. OET Bulletin 65 -Technical guideline developed by the FCC's Office of Engineering and Technology to determine the impact of RF exposure on humans. The guideline was published in August 1997. OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) - Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, employers are responsible for providing a safe and healthy workplace for their employees. OSHA's role is to promote the safety and health of America's working men and women by setting and enforcing standards; providing training, outreach and education; establishing partnerships; and encouraging continual process improvement in workplace safety and health. For more information, visit www.osha.aov. Radio Frequency Exposure or Electromagnetic Fields - Electromognetic waves that are propagated from antennas through space. Spatial Average Measurement A technique used to average a minimurn of ten (10) measurements taken in a ten (10) second interval from zero {0) to six (6} feet. This measurement is intended to model the average energy a 6 -foot tall human body will absorb while present in on electromagnetic field of energy. Transmitter Power Output (TPO) - The radio frequency output power of o transmitter's final radio frequency stage as measured al the output terminal while connected to a load. au. ,,t,dIytti...id use0*,.01w,««n.w.,..mn. ro. An,cempr•+.+. ex..a.b....mm °W"med Page 21 0 0 SiteSafe x,77, .. . Appendix G - References The following references can be followed for further information about RF Health and Safety. Site Safe, LLC http://www.sitesafe.com FCC Radio Frequency Safety http://www.fcc.clov/encyclopedia/radic-frequency-safety National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) http://www.ncrponline.orq Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc., (IEEE) http://www.leee.orq American National Standards Institute (ANSI) http://www.ansi.orq Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) http://www.epa.aov/radtown/wireless-tech.html National Institutes of Health (NIH) http://www.niehs.nih.aov/health/topics/aaents/ernf/ Occupational Safety and Health Agency (OSHA) http://www.osha.qov/SLTC/radiofrequencyradiation/ International Commission on Non -Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) htto://www.icnirp.orq World Health Organization (WHO) http://www.whaint/oeh-emf/en/ National Cancer Institute http://www.cancer.govicancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones American Cancer Society (ACS) htto://www.cancer.ora/docroot/PED/content/PED 1 3X Cellular Phone Towers.asp?sit earea=PED European Commission Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks htto://ec.europa.eu/health/ph risk/committees/04 scenihr/docs/scenihr o 022.pdf Fairfax County, Virginia Public School Survey http://www.fcps.edullts/safetv-security/RFEESurvey/ UK Health Protection Agency Advisory Group on Non -Ionizing Radiation http://www.hpa.ora.uk/webw/HPAweb&HPAwebStandard/HPAweb C/1317133826368 Norwegian Institute of Public Health http://www.fhi.no/dokumenter/545eea7147.pdf AT&T nepnetary(1111amel use nnmr). NII use or disclosure omnee he ATM e excerl w...meit es,eemeni. 020„ AUT imwxNs o. Page 22 1 Attachment 5— FAA TOWAIR Determination Report AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application TOWAIR Determination Results NOTICE*** TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ from application of the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification is not conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine if it must coordinate its structure with the FM. TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR participants in exercising this due diligence, and further investigation may be necessary to determine if FAA coordination is appropriate. DETERMINATION Res:dts Structure does not require registration. There are no airports within 8 kilometers (5 miles) of the coordinates you provided. Your Specifications NAD83 Coordinates Latitude 19-26-23.7 north Longitude 154-56-42.4 west Measurements (Meters) Overall Structure Height (AGL) 30.5 Support Structure Height (AGL) NaN Site Elevation (AMSL) 324.6 Structure Type MTOWER - Monopole TLS's Notifications Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower. Attachment 6—Site Photos & Photo Simulations AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application HIL03345 Leilani Estates Site Photos Entrance to Access Road from Pahoa Kalapana Rd Pahoa Kalapana Rd looking South adjacent to Proposed Facility Pahoa Kalapana Rd looking North adjacent to Proposed Facility C C C HIL03345 Leilani Estates Site Photos View toward Pahoa Kalapana Rd from Access Rodd sem- ..,;; _ View toward proposed site on Access Road looking West Proposed Site Location from Access Road A A at& t PHOTO SIMULATION FOR NEW MONOPOLE AND SHELTER LOCATED AT: 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD I PAHOA, HI 96778 SITE ID: HIL03345 SITE NAME: LEILANI ESTATES C VICINITY MAP 2a20aoeak 11A4 PREVIEW e SITE DESCRIPTION: NEW MONOPOLE AND SHELTER VIEWS: 2 SHEET INDEX SHEET 2: VIEW 1 SHEET 3: VIEW 2 SHEET: I / 3 Photo S, mu! at, ch By Tangent 949- 590 - 49001 www. tangent. systems Photo Simulation This photographic simulation is intended as a visual representation only and is not to be used for construction purposes. Accuracy of photo simulation is based on information provided by project applicant. j5 INFRASTRUCTURE Site ID: HIL03345 SITE TYPE: MONOPOLE 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA. HI 96778 A A EXISTING VIEW DATE 082120 PROPOSED VIEW VIEW I - LOOKING WEST FROM SERVICE ROAD SHEET: 2 / 3 Photo Simulation By' Tangent 949- 590- 4900Iw w. tanpant. systens Photo Simulation This photographic simulation is intended as a visual representation only and is not to be used far construction purposes. Accuracy of photo simulation is based on information provided by project applicant. S INFRASTRUCTURE Site ID: H I L03345 SITE TYPE: MONOPOLE 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 A DATE: 00. 14. 70 PROPOSED VIEW VIEW 2 - LOOKING NORTHWEST FROM PAHOA KALAPANA RD SHEET: 3 / 3 Photo Simulation By Tangent 949 590 49001vnww. tanpont. systems Photo Simulation This photographic simulation is intended as a visual representation only and is not to be used fa construction purposes. Accuracy of photo simulation is based on Information provided by project applicant. 15 INFRASTRUCTURE Site ID: HIL03345 SITE TYPE: MONOPOLE 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 Attachment 7— Letters of Authorization AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application Site Name, HIL0229 Kaahumanu Cr, LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION FOR ZONING/LAND USE ENTITLEMENTS Property Address: SANFORDS SERVICE CENTER INC. 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD, PAHOA, HI 96778 Tax Map Key: (3) 1-3-001:007 I We, the owner(s) of the above described property, authorize New Cingular Wireless, doing business as AT&T Mobility, whose address is 500 Kahelu Avenue, Mililani, Hawaii 96789, its employees, representatives, agents, and/or consultants, to act as an agent on my/our behalf for the sole purpose of consummating any and all building and land - use permit applications, or any other entitlements necessary for the purpose of constructing and operating a wireless telecommunications facility. t/We understand that any application may be denied, modified, or approved with conditions, and that such conditions or modifications must be complied with prior to issuance of building permits, and at all times thereafter. I/We further understand that signing of this authorization in no way creates an obligation of any kind. OwNER(S): SANFORDS SERVICE CENTER INC. 15-2628 KEAAU-PAHOA RD. PAHOA, HI 96778 PLEASE PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF SIGNATURE AUTHORITY*** Linda £'- i -Izv int Name V; CPj Pr&; c Cf Print Name Tale Title 4 & Signature Signature Date: /Z/09 /19• Date: Please Have LOA Notarized - Notary on 2"a Page***** Site Name. HIL0225I Kaalmmanu Cit. A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document State of HG1tNENn County of(11.N On this, the day of SS. D—t Cl.M Le 2019 before me Kari Anne Tanaka Notary Public, personally appeared of a_ S' 1WG-te• 0 personally known to me proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person( whose name v are subscribed to the within instument and acknowledged to me that bediethey executed the same in hiser)their authorized capacity(ies). and that by hist7tdi7.their slgnatury(sJ on the instrument the person(dj, or the entity on behalf of which the persona) acted, executed the instrument itness my hand and official seal: E 13-338 'r * l• 'unt1G \ 0/11......,111,,,,N0' rr0FtinV0' Svvi1NNE141/ 44 No My commission expires Doc. Date:, "-fs 11 Neune_ Karl Anne lane DDoe De onption,- Yh Li I the fore g pa p AT&T August 5, 2020 To Whom It May Concern: AT&T Services, Inc. 500 Kahelu Ave. M101886 HI 96789 www.att.com 15 Infrastructure Partners, its employees and agents (collectively, "15"), are authorized representatives of New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC ("AT&T") and have contracted to perform real estate leasing, land use entitlements, architectural, and engineering services for development of and modification of AT&T communication facilities. As a representative of AT&T, J5 is authorized to sign, submit, and review land -use applications and permits; provide representation at meetings and hearings; and negotiate leases on AT &T's behalf. All final land -use documents are subject to AT &T's review and approval. Furthermore, all leases, and any other legally binding documents, are contingent upon AT &T's review and the signature of a duly authorized AT&T manager. If there are any questions or comments, pleape contact me. Best Regards, le ey Riewer Area Manager Hawaii AT&T Mobility Services LLC Jr837t@att.com 808) 352- 4283 I ENI, AT&T Inulkcrnal Plopeny All nghis rtxmd.AT&T and 1lx Ulobe logo art rewsured vMen'arb of AT&T Intellectual Property Attachment 8—Zoning Drawings AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application CODE COMPLIANCE crw. u.^`*'°"^_^ NEW BUILDDS ONV IC MRSONv 465 ugoe4TDl titled AT& T CODE 1055" N' m. a AT& T N1 W04014 AND 6inrEY1, 15 51. 1 LIE rinrougo ... ND nisruiLom", AC C. D. LEwirx II4 0111111. 1110. 010. 0 1. 11.. 11... 0 AS ADO. Lint maani ( 0. 11, 04,... 11. NNINNNW W,.. 160 ". ENE., C010... 1011, DTMK: SITE NUMBER: HIL03345 SITE NAME: LEILANI ESTATES SITE TYPE: MONOPOLE/ SHELTER ADDRESS: 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD."`"""'"" 95my„ fatcTyPE 00 PAHOA, HI 96778 311- 3- 001: 007 p."". Hu03345 PROJECT TEAM VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION mum... r5, 011m, 1101. 10. 011NE0 raw NCI C0, 11ar MIR la we... sm . a,..,_-• larjAllitpgik SOW 0 . 113, 101.. FAWN 111 AC ue Y W n WNW. SOW w.. ...»....„„,....,.. nalWRO P. . ••• 1 1101.,.. N0<a. 1. 1 0910. 1 nallimalp• NNW. 10. 11100. 0 • • NW BIG auN ooF HAWAII q SITE INFORMATION GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEET INDEX REV. INA. N. NIENNE. 711111.... 101011.• m. 51101• 00111 NC Wm ma 10. 1. Mm mWWI,.... wi •• .... Nate aNnikaanien. ma 10 al AIILNINNINIK0101, 1 VI C.. , RE Imo 0, 1 0T. 11. E1C FOLLOW . 0 n,. w. n GENERAL NOTES w.. HIL03345 1001® STATEMENTS r.. Ww: a Di VT TITLE SHEET nil sun, .. 1. o ...., . ... e 1 SO` t° T. 1 L - NO BION 1W3N39SteCO11HDIA DI 11SPCCO71Hdhenxlsvelxis( DINIDDIS WTI IAA DWI-) . 1. 1. DIIDADIVICA Dee LADD 11. 1 IFID314) DNA) 11111100DIIIDDIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDIDDID NI IANIIIIINID S11. 00 DODO Lan µADD MID PIIIIIIIIIIII. DIDDIIIII 3) 010 II ID, 153110. DIDIDIDIDDIIII [ DAV Ain II - VII DIX ' In III DIVIDDIAI AIIIIDID 0011 III DID [ DIVA 1114, 28, DIIII I 1. 411. 1HAIDDID IVani. ald ID DIMS IIIII DIM., Oh DTI) JODI InliDDIIII IIIIIIIIA DIM AO : WI MAD MIND. ID". DIIIIIIIIQI InFIDD DINDIVIDIDDiNDARIDI DMA( DOIDIDODI SID . 11) / DJ RADII II 100) 11. 1DAVOIA 3, 11, 140 SIDIIDDIIIIIVIIDDIDE DDI IASID SY ICI ISCA. ill DWI MAIDS) VeDWIDDIVI DID [ WAIL WI I a.,,,..„., w.,. TAT& T L...,... rt Er Anal Tew AT& T MWa....,. -- AT& T MOBILITY N T 0010. CCEM 00C/ Illini 1: 0) 0C1 et 010011 DR ME CE.. Ep Enn FM ENCLOSILLINALALWER 111. 5. 115E0Seee et 111. 1. 1100 Le110001110/ 40011000/ 4190011.„. 11.: 14/ 00. 1ANDIX: 001. 1100/ COXIACT1010kWnleep 0111110/ 4 DIL/ A0Gf / OR n„ I 40e1000611\ 1011/ 00 00\ 1 be PM:( 01:( C0011. 010/} / 001a lith PACKAGE 0 ErNEw r:, no I o- M .. s 7- n.. w.. na m. m... r ' s e...— W, - 15. P U< TU, BE wvww xw. e. 17 IG .. w H1103345 DANGER NO TRESPASSINGII INFORMATION 1 234567 x.: n 2 ,, mm ,. ,. 0. w,. ® a.,, ! n v7. 7 a o ,..,,. » a. o... u. '." m O D/ AVINS1 LI: 7. x7..,.. 11 n. E Properly AT& T —— L T^ C V O / I CCJ I Authorized P11110Q1• 11 ersonnelPersonnel Only r,_,.. ,.,,..,.. r,,..., AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY OA"" WARNING I1 Heyond This Points.. are seem& a mime.] awe sohe CAUTION ' NOTICE ' Beyond This Point d ThisaPoryou unto in a 4441441k4 arta m. E. uy,,,. FCC , . t} ' Cyr:" 0 O © PTonedy OT AT& T 0 <> 41. Authorized I Personnel Only HIL03345 vision m. 047 CDANGEFR) CDANGE& a.., DIESEL FUEL IDD ACM GiIfpaLS "— - SITESIGNAGENO GN- 2 SMOKING NO OPEN FLAMES NO SMOKING 0... m o.... AGE . i o,, „,.. PE . ., K PROPOSED AT& T PROJECT AREA LEER TO tNIARGEO AYlf Pt AN ON SHEET A. 2 EP S-. AT& T HIt03345 A- 1 SITE PLAN SAT & T 2 All in 22, 221FX2Col 11. 0, 4221 IC r- 2122 MO IIK if 022 , ROOF w,.. r,.., OM)$ .. IF olVOJOAC1 L 0, 111, jNKNLKNam m.„,. w. na¢ J w oN v. in 12- e. oe Arm s., IC MU Croe1121EALIIOCOOrtibrni 020211& OHCOUll nur 111103345 e0 aS 2VAUI„ VI On. _ fir -_ IS `. I in n, Mo...., tr. _ _ 1 m 22.— - r. w/wcrv, m nmm l cniuw cmvM. 0 Cc 2: 12XCIOC„,„ nwmol et 12 WM. 2- 11. 2CH On 21/ 01 I „ 2421CIAN„ On „ MI 0n 0 H1103345 13„ 5„ COW, ItAinP11222 KO r. noe nismm cc „ o „„ co „„ o O. PAHOA KALAPANA ROAD iILl16FO SOV{ PH tCOMPowU LA" A- 2 n.^ u" cav wn COMPOUND PIAN _ h 2 DIE PIAN ENLARGED 0. 1 CIS ANIENNA1MANIED ID 1111411100 Of * 111fa Irl HVAC INN. ( 11. 1111 R IO MAIAFACItNERIIAWN43 A PRMt1RARED i V AT& T YOU.. ArRY f.. An9N1 NI'[_ i. NI IN CANING A110 IOUP' MENI MUST & NSINIED AND MO M ACCORDANCE wl111 THE P. 00uCrs INCIVUU WIRUC0O q. 11StNG AND/ ORIA& 1NG 1104• 110M NIS. PER AEC I SKNOII 110.! 181. 2 ALL Try CABINGCONOBA6w1N AND TO et RNIAUEU Pt RMC 13610& 11617 1 MIS MI SIAC. D NOSIAGGE& D 1010 4 N& YY1ANnt44M. IO0I6/ N1 COAX AAO ACC115ORES MOEMID IO If[ Irl MDNOrdt Alt BE P91* 0 GMIN. 1. IIMDNOPOU Null. M P_ llo 61101. I VMS,- — INFRASTRUCTURE JDAt NAANNAWW) 53R11N Irr Sg4 199 0041 1P1 ANTENNA 541001.410E510./ BY OTHERS' 401• 41040 MAW b, t I ... `• 1, 1 11, at1 j _-- li • I 11 mm ma Cr Nf/ 1Md1O/ OI! r iE Rill I + 4 f II) UNCLOG* MI Bon 1 II 50. 401E IYB ' Nit Y MINIM1 1 I IPI tAYRSON- 1M POW it RANI EAC[ w/ NI I Of EM. 01NAND ES l I^ NNW I 1- V" INA- 2W Eft V SIWRISON MEM I IN 0C1711110t I SIMEZSOR Will. RAC[ D01N• 71 A14. 13114 10 I L03345 P)] Kw AC Ca41w/ 196 CARONlANI I II MEfaw6CJ6. 4R--- - - 0 IR iN. ICAM MIRY. 11P41, hNrRo RACK 001A1 ) I I AC I11116W MSE8NID Ca UM WPM AMMO ... Ca I 1- IN AurPREIAeRICNlD SHIN 14 EOOPMEM SNEI It R MEANTED 10 RAISED f.( MICRIII 1AD tnDEYl fun Sr8l w in MAIDco( 7EIE STOOP 7Mit 1 IN0MAIICIRANNIR SVIICN PI 0000N4C1 SW1101 GumIXU * U ma N1NMO1N11U RUf SillRIINA& 10w m RICO POP IIIIRf E11R1GIM11FR m MCO BOARD WOCANIXYID DRAWN STI TSC CIIIC[ 115 Br Wm I RWA19 RfOS MV 0 4[ A/ 19 IDDiEp A 0)/ W/ 19 90000. Rn DAn DFSCRPIR N 2P5C)}; ; , OAt" w N EQUIPMENT PLAN r .,-. 1 2 706 10 , Yi•.3 fir Ot - • // M y B t, Z., 11 1 % S- i IN A1aI DC6 DOMED SUO1 . `: SUPYRISSOR M. IIOIN- 61 171 ' AIM PACK 10 BALI RRU ®'% NOINI. M1P. IMIN- I. le l/— 1. 1 i d 1.'"- V • 14 111, 11. t KU. NP. SWIM DOTN• 9PER 1 7. 10 6 10'- r t 74 E: jR N, B, B , 1: pp . I7 t w, y, 1 7T I I111‘ 10111 36 10 a— I e w IQ M'. HI103345 MANESTATES 11 X. YAIDA IAIAPANARO PA190A. HI96770 il/ U• ( 7) 13001007 4 r _ _ ®` I 51. N t.. ANTENNA I EQUIPMENT AAN I— r 17. 10 r N. AI EAorndo DIMENSION PLAN 1 V A- 3 NSI 3 ANTENNA PLAN ,,, . : 1 PMNSO NA \ AT& T mwnVAwv. Muwra. LMsw 1 MA AMO, AAIMAEM. COM. NO ACCESSORIESMOI It TO IPI M( YgPOLE fIWlWIAMIEDtO All 7 IIIAIORA' ST AMINA '$,71fPA.. 1E0fi1510 I I " 11. 1 11401 IAM' l. AIO NAGE A1tf) 1() RS rtltLOCAIW INWIT71/ 0111. I. O. III 0A0MFOIIVII; / ICIt IOGIAI. p W* HEl. SS. NASI TM Aft! PAT. " NIT IFAS WM 10 PIIVCOS PIAT. vans Mb. -- ( UV IOpO lAc1) j M ORAWtd WI 1111NI in lflS 00. IOUPMIMI. CO.. AND nCCFSSORlS AAALIA U10IK IYI MOHOP01t SMALL PA IAINIIO GR11N. 7. ( PIMANOPOLtSNA, MIDOWIWOGWEN. AI LIRRII' S. IAIA' 3. AND 104 AARESI( NM1 1 ( OCAIWG IWvtwIORCIAWIY r. IOC..... Mlle NMS. PLEASE IO hAA0110IO11lNN/ Il AIIr IAI1 * ( AOAS 011. 10 Rtv10I. RAM SI WS MILAN - - li( V HS10( AG11. IHI MAW.* 111 .. 101 I11111. 1----- 3. t 1I flfvN 41A III ANItOW3 77 RXCAUSIUH MANCE. lit. ISr10M As 1 111101 . 411HOHOLUV. AAILI PANra NOWA. TP. 3W SKI. ( I01A1,: 1 IPI Alit IWO L 0. 1. Oi( III OC IOWERr1I1IStN MUM CAKES W111141 7 MIIOOCI 100110 W11I4114 RIMONOP011 IO I UnOV I( Nl 11 . o ' o IAGAA' y A_HRNHAS RAO CEMBtJ 15) 1010! STRUC1URE 0/ ALA MUANAMW. SIE Al) MAW/ 1116813 o Io• Wd IuIuiIili y' II _ __-_=___ SPI ILPPANTI P1OrSTANCt. 101111171 it, Alit ( 000 Wm . 1. 4. 00IIIA III D? POWER • 0111110 1104 CAWS WHlf/ 7 WNWOUCtlOI Ie0 WIMI VI 0O40. 00 IPI Aral CAMEpt A I IROGT tlev.91O' IA. Gi AHIINNA /' EXCLUSION WI [ SHOWN. 410) M AILI 1. 341/ 0414441. 4- WI. 3Ptt 317101 ( 101/ 0- 171 10 II UIYIII' Pdf r _ -. tlf1tlYa N. Gl34 IIF -- / t- A1ir / AIM POLE 101 OVIWlADPOWtII Witt 0/ 1AIar SHIN 14 EC7WMtM WEIR IOn SIEil1__ y AILI ) 170 H 1103345 AWNtr. AL Cr11rm1` Aw I 0/ 171/ 19 WITS REV 0 OWI/ IV I(X7S. 11h A 01/ 07/ 19 OM IO. ON Dvi 010000( x1 I. emu tr:"`' ` r" VI1. 141- Unl1 POO OVIBEAOPOWII a Met I 1I I I I1' AILrSAlt IV 1A. vEIItR i Inv. vlly• HI103345 MUM ESTATES I) l& o 1191776 W s. IMX: 13) 1. 3001: OD7 I / 7 ,./.-. 1 y 3 v. I s ( A. aa. l 10 IPICNAtHt. IFHtt I 10 slA. c f1 I. O. I41. 04. 4. 1144001 CI wow Me ELEVATIONS V l L_,.._ ALO NOII' y Il L' O MON 0111 N CNA.. I III WHO WI IRNAC1 SUM fMINn GRADE IF4NUf ORICW— - OMN MI MICE w/' I f11VACr LAK 11, .•....•• _ :: G( V.00N rllintD (: rtA1* Elty VV a le Irl AILI' 7. 0 wrOI/: MANMa II NS. 1 00. 41 Sw+ C. r... I, S W; .. 1ttX YA, S IlIV. DC V Nhe, wntr• A- 4 EAST ELEVATION - 0 - - — 12 WEST ELEVATION'' 1 1 Attachment 9— List of Property Owners 25 Mile Radius AT&T Mobility Site H1103345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application TM K: 1-3-001-007 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 Parcelld OwnerName OwnerAddress2 City St Zip 120090030000 STATE OF HAWAII 120090040000 STATE OF HAWAII 120100010000 OLSON, EDMUNDC TR 42 46AMAUULU RD HILO HI 96720 130010010000 GRONOWSKI, STANLEY JACEK 13- 4003 PAHOA- KALAPANA RD PAHOA HI 96778 130010020000 AMBROSE, TIMOTHY KEMP PO BOX 1476 PAHOA HI 96778 130010030000 BROWN, KAREN N 41 IIWIPOLENA RD HILO HI 96720 130010030000 KAMELAMELA, JOSEPH K 41 IIWIP0LENA RD HILO HI 96720 130010030000 KAMELAMELA, SAMUEL C 89- 1012 POHAKUPALENA ST WAIANAE HI 96792 130010030000 KAMELAMELA, WILLIAM K 41 IIWIP0LENA RD HILO HI 96720 130010040000 BROWN, KAREN N 41 IIWIPOLENA RD HILO HI 96720 130010040000 KAMELAMELA, JOSEPH K 41 IIWIPOLENA RD HILO HI 96720 130010040000 KAMELAMELA, SAMUEL C 89- 1012 POHAKUPALENA ST WAIANAE HI 96792 130010040000 KAMELAMELA, WILLIAM K 41 IIWIPOLENA RD HILO HI 96720 130010070000 SANFORDS SERVICE CENTER INC PO BOX 1321 PAHOA HI 96778 130010080000 EWING, CHARLENE PO BOX 1120 PAHOA HI 96778 130010080000 EWING, DAVID PO BOX 1120 PAHOA HI 96778 130010080000 SORTE, BRADLEY E PO BOX 1145 PAHOA HI 96778 130010100000 FORSTER, ERIC PO BOX 1727 HAINES AK 99827 130010160000 HAIFLEY, SHIRENA 3395 S JONES BLVD LAS VEGAS NV 89146 130010170000 ELDERTS, GEORGE PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 ELDERTS, HAN NAH PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 HALEMANO, EMMA E PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 HAWAIIAN AWA CO LTD PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 KAAWALOA, MINNIE PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 KAHELE, LEHUA S PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 KAUWES LAND& RESEARCH DEV IN 265D KEKUANAOA ST HILO HI 96720 130010170000 MAKUAKANE- LUNDIN, GAIL 486 TODD AVE HILO HI 96720 130010170000 MARY L MELIM PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 MELIM, BESS K PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 MELIM, BESSIE K PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 MELIM, BRUCE H PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 MELIM, BRUCE H PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 MELIM, ROWLINDA K PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 a i 130010170000 MELIM, ROWLINDA K PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 TAKAKI, HATTIE E Cj0 ELI WHITNEY PO BOX 6257 OCEAN VIEW HI 96737 130010170000 WOOD, MARLENEY PO BOX 1239 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 YOUNG, ELIZABETH K PO BOX 467 PAHOA HI 96778 130010170000 YOUNG, LISA 4054 STONE CANYON AVE SHERMAN OAKS CA 91403 130010180000 NEMEC, AMY 12- 7157 LOKE PL PAHOA HI 96778 130010180000 WOLFE, KEVIN N 22909 DATE AVE TORRANCE CA 90505 130010180000 WOLFE, WADE E RR 2 BOX 4215 PAHOA HI 96778 130010310000 VAISHOUIN 201 OHUA AVE APT 1- 302 HONOLULU HI 96815 130010420000 HOROWITZ, LEONARD G 5348 VEGAS DR STE 353 LAS VEGAS NV 89108 130010420000 MEDICAL VERITAS INTERNATIONAL INC PO BOX 75104 HONOLULU HI 96836 130010430000 HESTER, JASON 13- 3775 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA HI 96778 130010470000 DAVIES SCHECHTEL, FAMILY TRST 391 MISSOURI ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94107 130010490000 HALAI HEIGHTS LLC PO BOX 5258 HILO HI 96720 130010530000 CAMPBELL, JEFFERY RAY 13- 3863 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA HI 96778 130010530000 GARBARINO, MICHAEL HENRY 13- 3863 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA HI 96779 130010540000 AMY 108, TRST PO BOX 1539 KEAAU HI 96749 130010550000 SEYFRIED, ROBERTJ 12- 202 OLIANA DR PAHOA HI 96778 130010560000 AMBROSE, TIMOTHY KEMP PO BOX 1476 PAHOA HI 96778 130010570000 AUSTIN, HEIDE 13- 3782 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA HI 96778 130010620000 SKILLING, NICOLE 2009 TRST 89- 857 MAMALAHOA HWY CAPTAIN COOK HI 96704 130010630000 MC FALL, DENELL V PO BOX 307 LITTLERIVER CA 95456 130010630000 TRIMIEW, DIANE V TR PO BOX 307 LITTLERIVER CA 95456 130010640000 LA' AKEA COMMUNITY LLC PO BOX 1071 PAHOA HI 96778 130010640000 WILLOUGHBY, DONA M PO BOX 1071 PAHOA HI 96778 130010650000 BISKO, WILLIAM JR PO BOX 2 BATTLE CREEK MI 49016 130010710000 AMBROSE, TIMOTHY KEMP PO BOX 1476 PAHOA HI 96778 130010720000 SEYFRIED, ROBERTJ 12- 202 OLIANA DR PAHOA HI 96778 130010730000 YOZA, ALLAN M TRS PO BOX 1539 KEAAU HI 96749 130010740000 HAIFLEY, CHANEL R 3395 5 JONES BOULEVARD # 308 LAS VEGAS NV 89146 130010760000 YOZA, ALLAN M PO BOX 1539 KEAAU HI 96749 130010770000 YOZA, ALLAN M PO BOX 1539 KEAAU HI 96749 130010780000 YOZA, ALLAN M PO BOX 1539 KEAAU HI 96749 130010790000 BAILEY, MICHAEL SCOTT 1353 WAILUKU DR HILO HI 96720 130010790000 NORTON, JOANNA MARY 1353 WAILUKU DR HILO HI 96720 130010800000 YOZA, ALLAN M PO BOX 1539 KEAAU HI 96749 130010830000 HAIFLEY, CHARLES 3395 5 JONES BLVD APT 308 LAS VEGAS NV 89146 130010840000 HAIFLEY, CHANEL R 33955 JONES BOULEVARD# 308 LAS NV 89147 130010850000 CHILKAT ENVIRONMENTAL LLC PO BOX 2067 PAHOA HI 96778 130010860000 ADVANCED COMPOSTING SYSTEMS LLC 195 MEADOWS RD WHITEFISH MT 59937 130010870000 VANCE, BEVERLY PO BOX 1657 PAHOA HI 96778 130010880000 JACQUIER, STEVEN HOWARD PO BOX 832 PAHOA HI 96778 130010880000 VAUGHAN, DORAN PO BOX 832 PAHOA HI 96778 130010890000 MISKOVICH, JEAN MARIE PO BOX 1221 PAHOA HI 96778 130010900000 COUNTY OF HAWAII 130010910000 KEALOHA, JONATHAN 13- 3749 OLD KALAPANA RD PAHOA HI 96778 130010910000 KEALOHA, LEILA 13- 3749 OLD KALAPANA RD PAHOA HI 96778 130010930000 MATSUBARA, DELLA LEOLA PO BOX 601 PEPEEKEO HI 96783 130010950000 ROYAL BLOODLINE OF DAVID C/ O HOROWITZ, LEONARD G 5348 VEGAS DR# 353 LAS VEGAS NV 89108 The most important wireless network in the country FirstNet® 101 FirstNet is a nationwide, high-speed wireless broadband network and set of specialized, innovative tools, technologies and features specifically built for public safety. FirstNet is designed for every first responder in the country - career or volunteer; city, state, tribal or federal; and urban, suburban or rural. Think firefighters, EMS personnel, law enforcement, 9-1-1 communicators and emergency managers. FirstNet is also available to a community of users who are critical to supporting an emergency response including nurses and physicians or utility companies that clear downed power lines and manage gas teaks. Why was it created? Public safety is called upon to handle emergencies every single day. They must be ready for the worst with the best tools to help them respond as quickly and safely as possible. But first responders have repeatedly struggled to reliably communicate and coordinate across agencies and jurisdictions. The tragic events of 9/11 underscored this, making it clear that public safety needed a better way to communicate. So, FirstNet was born to improve public safety communications nationwide. Making public safety communications a national priority Why is it unique? FirstNet is the only communications platform specifically designed with and for public safety based on their direct feedback and needs. FirstNet performs faster than any commercial network* and is interoperable across agencies. Robust tools and features only found on FirstNet include: Always -on, 24 -hours -a -day priority and preemption across voice and data for first responders Dedicated access to Band 14 spectrum where and when it's needed Mission -centric tools - like apps and devices -tested for public safety, plus free smartphones for first responder agencies" Access to a dedicated fleet of 76+ portable network assets Unparalleled support for public safety's mission Government oversight and accountability from the FirstNet Authority Giving public safety a diverse set of communications capabilities How does it work? FirstNet uses all AT&T LTE spectrum bands and a special lane of connectivity called Band 14 - nationwide, high-quality spectrum specifically set aside for FirstNet. During an emergency, this band - or lane - can be cleared and locked just for FirstNet subscribers. Whatever the mission - responding to a routine call, supporting a large event or managing an emergency or disaster - FirstNet gives priority to public safety, so they can connect where and when they need to, to keep us all safer. Creating a specialized communications highway just for public safety Why does it matter? No connection matters more than one that could help save a life. That's why our work to give first responders access to the leading tools that will help them do their important jobs is something we can all feel good about. Equipping first responders with 24/7 reliable, unthrottled connectivity and an ecosystem of cutting-edge apps, devices and solutions means they can connect to the critical information they need - every day and in every emergency - without worrying about connectivity challenges. FirstNet is also bringing more reliable communications to rural communities across the country - covering over 2.61 million square miles nationwide and growing. Helping public safety achieve their mission as they work to keep us safe What's AT&T's role? AT&T is the official private partner behind FirstNet. We are working with the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet Authority) - an independent government agency - to design, build and evolve FirstNet for the next 20+ years. Serving public safety is our mission By the Numbers As of 2.0 2020 FirstNet covers 2.61M+ square miles nationwide `4 50 states, 5 territories, + the District of Columbia 5m+ FirstNet connections 13K public safety agencies and organizations subscribed What are others saying about it? FirstNet is spurring innovation that will help save lives, and we are thrilled to see the network continue to grow to reach more communities and responders that serve them across the country," said FirstNet Authority GEO Edward Parkinson. FIRSTNET€ Built with AT&T Based on AT&T analysis of Ookla$ Speedtest Intelligence° data median download speeds for Q2 2020 Ookla trademarks used under license and reprinted with permission. Available only to FirstNet first responder public safety entities for Primary Agency Paid User lines of service. Requires a new FirstNet Mobile Unlimited for Smartphone hne or eligible upgrade on a two-year service agreement or AT&T installment 30-n ninth agreement. For two-year agreement, upgrade your smartphone with a new eligible smartphone every two years at no additional cost for as long as your service plan is in effect and In good standing. Pay $.99 for eligible smartphone at purchase, credited back within three billing cycles. Upgrade requires new two-year agreement. For AT&T installment 30 -month agreement, upgrade your smartphone with a new ekgbie smartphone every time you satisfy your current AT&T Installment agreement and sign a new one for no additional cost for as long as your service plan is in effect and in good standing. For both plans, tax on full discount price itwo-year agreement) or lull retail price (AT&T Installment agreement) due at sale. Activation and Other fees, taxes, charges and restrictions apply. See firstnet.com(agencyoffersfor otter details. O 2020 AT&T ImNletua PAwry All rprn reserved. AT&T the Globe lag* and mtm marks are trademarks and service maks ofAT&T I,XNIMual Property and/or AT&T affiliated wnperte_ t2MNe and theFvstNIM kyo Erol pateraf tradenwks.of the fort Rescbder Network AIDvvrty Al dMx marks contained herein m the pceerry dthew res(xdnro owners. AT&T: Making Sure Your Community Stays Connected Thad is _ie pre eSS stekodi Spadaa new :eh Site? The new site target locations are passed to a construction team to find suitable locations to lease. Colocation with existing facilities isconsidered and pursued wherever feasible Placement on suable existing structures (building rooftops, a. des o t ieings, cupolas and other existing structures) is preferred f the existing structure meets the network design objectives and is teasible. Once AT&T lease's a site the approval/permit recess begins. In addition to oval zoning and perming rev. r rpm c ass,counties or other unsdic:on, sites often ref] Li ire review by other ances at the IOCar State and fed oral level suer as the FAA, FCC and the State and Tribal Historical Preservation Offices Once all at this is complete.A`&l can build the site and commission it for service, Erd-to-end cycle times vary greatly and are heavily influenced by the planning and permitting process ooca] lursdc on. We arm to achieve appr<vals'wthin timeframes set by the FCC Shot Clock. AT&T I cos the sa tett! CfitsSusteits erefirst. AT&T builds and mancairs al el, phone towers and antennas in accordance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency (RF) fields, The energy from the antennas on cell phone towers decreases with dsranee. As a result, normalgroundieye/ exposure is much Fewer than ofa person was veryclose to the antenna and the main transmittedbeam Ar a typical celste, grornilevelcower densities are well below the CCs exposure limits See mor e at: http://www. fcc.gov/cgb/consumerfacts/rfexposure.html Re a Ie' ;erdc, i and vitt,. COver are can Hen eta' a community_ Toe new generation has laps ely grown up with, and is comfortable with,technology. In fact, more than half (50.8%) of American homes have chosen to be wire cats -only and haveciven up their landllnes' Consumers want access to wireless phone and broadband atchnol ogy. The a senee ofb na nd can make a cornrun ry a less attractye location for new investmentand deve'ooment. Wireless and highspeed broadband has many positve benefits for vital institutions like schools. hospitals and police and ire departments, and residents New and upgraded infrastructure del vers community benefits including enhanced public safety, access to mproved education, flea :h care and economic development opportunities. dc, ‘. tc- :1,e ->_y re'-zp ci0l€ Our engineers follow strict federal, state and oca I safety standards and we work with the local community to im pre' aesthetics whenever possible. AT&T network eq'.. i Amen t and technicians constant y monrn1 arra ex-.ensi of resT.. srkr network to enwee' that we ar de ive ng reliable robust sere Cu to our customers. kerr c Erse constantly scr!Jr inizng our network and re' soon) g to customer leadback to identify locations nee to add capacity enhance cove t:le and address coverage gaps. Some of the -cols we use to h ear fromaro comic -kr) pute with customers du_apacitj arc =maracc issues include: Mark t Spot App anal; es ascis to identity coverage gaps Responding to cus-omers on social media channes. Customers c ontacting ups erect to discussGiscuss coverage gaps. Additonafy. we work closely wth government officials and community leaders :o identify areas it need of enhanced capacity and coverage I&1 isCv000 C?Q it ; t, ia,:J' e c,U ire you GIA Cl y0 or te'css 2 tic,: World Health organization American Cancer Society National Instltotho or Health —National anter Institute Federal CommuncationaCommissinn tFCC! Food and Drug Administration Gila" The Health and safety of cr nsu ars s t wireless indu s first priority. Herts what you shout know about ii.,dli ttoquenc IRE vv:rEess devices. Experts agree that wireless devices have not been shown to pose a public health risk. Overwhelming scientific evidence shows no known health risk to humans from RF energy emitted by wireless devices, includingsmartphones. This evidence includes numerous, independent analyses of peer-reviewed studies conducted over several decades by national and international organizations. Federal governmentstadstic; show the number of brain tumors has remained unchanged since mobile phones were widely introduced in the 1980s while the number of mobile phones and sites has increased significantly, by a factor of 325 and 140, respectiveiy. Cellular equipment operates within safety limits. RF energy from antennas used in cellular transmissions, including 5G small cells, result in exposure levels well below FCC safety limits. These limits are based on recommendations from the scientific community and expert non-government organizations. The widely accepted scientific consensus is that towers, small cells, antennas, and other celular infastructure pose no known hazard to nearby residents --and as the FCC notes, "the possibility that a member of the general public could be exposed to RF levels in excess of the FCC guidelines is extremely remota FCC regulations protect health and safety. All wireiess devices sold in the U.S. must go through a rigorous approval process to ensure they meet the science -based guidelines set by the FCC. These guidelines—based on internationalty'recognized scientific organizations—Set limits for the maximum amount of RF exposure from wireless devices and include a significant margin of safety (Christopher C. Davis Testimony, 2018). Wireless devices and antennas operate welt under FCC thresholds (Christopher C. Davis Testimony, 2018). 5G and safety The scientific consensus is that there are no known health risks from all forms of RF energy at the low levels approved for everyday consumer use. The FCC regulates RF emissions, including millimeter waves from 56 devices and equipment. In December 2019, the FCC adopted the recommendations of expert organizations that have reviewed the science, including from the IEEE, and reaffirmed—on a unanimous and bipartisan basis—that its safety standards "ensure the health and safety of workers and consumers of wireless technology," and that"no scientific evidence establishes a causal link between wireless device use and cancer or other illnesses." Typical exposure to SG devices—such as small cells attached to phone poles or the sides of buildings—is far below the permissible levels and comparable to Bluetooth devices and baby monitors. The FCC continues to monitor the science to ensure that its regulations are protective of public health. Expert voices Based on our ongoing evaluation of this issue and taking into account all available scientific evidence we have received, we have not found sufficient evidence that there are adverse health effects in humans caused by exposures at or under the current radiofrequency energy exposure limits. Even with frequent daily use by the vast majority ofadults, we have not seen an increase in events like brain tumors." Director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2018) iT he RF waves given off by cell phones don't have enough energy to damage DNA directly or to heat body tissues. Because of this, it's not clear how cell phones might be able to cause cancer" American Cancer Society (2018) We have relied on decades of research and hundreds of studies to have the most complete evaluation of radiofrequency energy exposure. This information has informed the FDA's assessment of this important public health issue, and given us the confidence that the current safety limits for cell phone radiofrequency energy exposure remain acceptable for protecting the public health. _. T] he totality of the available scientific evidence continues to not support adverse health effects in humans caused by exposures at or under the current radiofrequency energy exposure limits." Director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health (2018) More information is available at wirelesshealthfacts com. Agencies and shape U.S. regulat msbtute of Electrical and Elect onics Engineers IEEE. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements International commission on Nonionizing Radation Protection there is no evidence to support that adverse health effects in humans are caused by exposures at, under, or even in some cases above, the current RF limits. Indeed, no scientific evidence establishes a causal link between wireless device use and cancer or other illnesses." FCC Order reaffirming exist solely standards, Dec 2019 ctia 06000.00 Attachment 10— Real Property Tax Clearance AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application L I IARRIKIM MA1'(OR DI ANNA S SAKO FINAN(' I] I)IR I.C1 OR S I'TNT A ILL N DILA t v- DIRT CI OR COUNTY OF HAWAII Department of Finance - Real Property Tax Aupun, Comet, i 0I Pariah! Sweet_ Suite 41 Ihlo I laxri E No720-4224 1 Fax (&08)961-4224 Apprmsers 1808)961-g3541 Clerical t808)961-82011 Collections t8081961-8282 Nest Ilmtai1 ("nc Center 174-5044 Ant Ktahnkalalc IIms Bldg 1) 2nd Floor 1 Kmlua Kona -Nowa! %74 Pax 180811273538 jARpramen L8081 311-188 1 1 Clerical t8081323-0880 REAL PROPERTY TAX CLEARANCE Date: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 TMK: (3)1-3-001-007-0000 Sanfords Service Center Inc This is to certify that the real property taxes due to the County of Hawai'i on the parcel listed above have been paid for the tax year up to and including December 31, 2020. The County's real property taxes are levied on July 1st each year. The taxes become a lien on the property assessed as of the levy date. This clearance was requested on behalf of Sanfords Service Center Inc and is issued for this parcel only. by elsey Shimabukuro,Clerk ID PROPERTY TAX DIVISION Paid up to and including December 31, 2020. TM CLEARANCE FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT REV(212018) Tea)sia.ww Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer Attachment 11— NEPA Screening Report Flora and Fauna Report AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT SCREENING REPORT For the Wireless Communications Facility Known as HIL03345 FA 10553982 / LEILANI ESTATES Located at 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road Pahoa, Hawaii County, Hawaii EBI Project No. 61200001112 August 7, 2020 Prepared for: AT&T Mobility, LLC 3939 E. Coronado Street Anaheim, California 92807 Prepared by: EBI Consulting A environmental 1 engineering !due diligence CONTENTS NEPA SUMMARY CHECKLIST 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1 1.1 Purpose & Scope 1 1.2 Project Details 1 1.3 Conclusions 1 2.0 NEPA REVIEW SUMMARY 2 2.1 Wilderness Areas [§1.1307(a)(1)] 2 2.2 Wildlife Preserves [41.1307(a)(2)] 2 2.3 Protected Species & Critical Habitats [§1.1307(a)(3)] 2 2.4 Historic & Archaeological Resources [41.1307(a)(4)] 4 2.5 Indian Religious Sites [§1.1307(a)(5)] 4 2.6 Floodplains [§1.1307(a)(6)] 5 2.7 Significant Changes to Surface Features [§1.1307(a)(7)] 5 2.8 High Intensity White Lights in Residential Neighborhoods [41.1307(a)(8)] 6 2.9 Radio Frequency Radiation [41.1307(b)1 6 3.0 LIMITATIONS 7 4.0 SIGNATORIES 8 APPENDIX A: FIGURES APPENDIX B: NATURAL RESOURCES REVIEW APPENDIX C: HISTORIC RESOURCES REVIEW APPENDIX D: TRIBAL CORRESPONDENCE SUMMARY APPENDIX E: RESUMES NEPA SUMMARY CHECKLIST EBI Consulting HIL ID: Site HIL03345 FA 10553982 / LEILANI Address: 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road s environmental) engineering l due diligence ESTATES Pahoa, Hawaii County, Hawaii FCC NEPA Screening Checklist [(41.1307(a)] 41.1307(a) Actions that may have a significant environmental effect, for which EAs must be prepared. Yes No 1) Will the facility be located in an officially designated wilderness area? 0 0 2) Will the facility be located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? 0 3) Will the facility affect listed or proposed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats? 0 4) Will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places? t 5) Will the facility affect an Indian religious site? El0 6) Will the facility be located in a 100 -year floodplain and not elevated at least one -foot above the BFE? 0 7) Will construction of the facility involve significant change in surface features (e.g. wetland fill, water diversion orEl deforestation)? Gt 8) Will the facility be located within a residential neighborhood and utilize high intensity white lights? 0 0 Important Notes 41.1307(a of FCC above fi ding is or e iminate included in the contractors will Based upon the results of EBI's assessment, the Wireless Facility will not result in a significant environmental effect per NEPA Rules. As such, the preparation of an Environmental Assessment for these criteria is NOT required. Refer to Section 2.0 of this report for complete summary of EBI's evaluation of the Wireless Facility. Please note, the contingent upon adherence to, or the implementation of special conditions or mitigation measures designed to minimize impacts on the following: Threatened & Endangered Species / Critical Habitats (see Section 2.3 for details) Indian Religious Sites (see Section 2.5 for details) Please also note, an evaluation of radio frequency (RF) emissions exposure per 41.1307(6) of FCC NEPA rules was not scope of services of this NEPA Screening report. EBI understands that the FCC licensee and/or authorized RF engineering ensure compliance with all applicable RF radiation exposure limits. Completed by: Ms. Melissa Bauer / Senior Scientist DateAugust 7 2020 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1 Purpose & Scope EBI Consulting (EBI) has prepared this National Environmental Policy Act Screening Report (NEPA Screening Report) for the wireless communications facility referenced in Section 1.2 below (herein, the Wireless Facility"). The purpose of this NEPA Screening Report is to evaluate the Wireless Facility in accordance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) NEPA implementing rules (47 CFR ¢1.1301- 1.1320) to determine if it may have a significant environmental effect for which an Environmental Assessment (EA) is required. EBI prepared this NEPA Screening Report using project design and location details provided by the Applicant or an authorized representative. EBI also completed independent research and/or consultation with applicable interested parties (as required) to further evaluate the potential impacts of the Wireless Facility on the human environment. 1.2 Project Details FCC Applicant: AT&T Mobility, LLC Location: 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road Pahoa, Hawaii County, Hawaii Lat / Long: 19° 26' 23.778" N / 154° 56' 42.46" W Site ID: HIL03345 FA 10553982 / LEILANI ESTATES Project Description: According to details provided to EBL the Wireless Facility consists of the construction of a new wireless communications tower facility. Please refer to the attachments for complete details. The location of the Wireless Facility, including any and all associated antennas and equipment, supporting infrastructure, lease areas, and utility/access easements (if applicable) are herein referred to as the "Project Site." 1.3 Conclusions Based upon the results of EBI's assessment, the Wireless Facility will not result in a significant environmental effect per §1.1307(a) of FCC NEPA Rules. As such, the preparation of an Environmental Assessment for these criteria is NOT required. Please refer to the NEPA Summary Checklist, Section 2.0, and the attachments for complete details of EBI's evaluation. 2.0 NEPA REVIEW SUMMARY The following section summarizes EBI's evaluation of the proposed wireless facility to determine whether it may result in a significant environmental effect, as defined in §1.1307(a) and (b) of FCC NEPA Rules. 2-1 Wilderness Areas I5L-13o7;a)(1)] Will the facility be located in an officially designated wilderness area? EBI reviewed publicly available federal lands mapping data' maintained by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the United States Forest Service (USFS), the National Park Service (NPS), and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). FINDING: Based on EBI's review of the above -referenced data, the Project Site is not located within a federal - designated Wilderness Area. Please refer to Appendix B for relevant supporting documentation. 2.2 Wildlife Preserves f41.1307(02)] Will the facility be located in an officially designated wildlife preserve? EBI reviewed publicly available federal lands data' maintained by the USFWS, the USFS, the NPS, and the BLM. FINDING Based on EBI's review of the above -referenced data, the Project Site is not located within a federal - designated Wildlife Preserve. Please refer to Appendix B for relevant supporting documentation. i 2.3 Protected Species & Critical Habitats 151.]30/(d)(3)1 Will the facility affect listed threatened or endangered species or designated critical habitats, or is it likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any proposed endangered or threatened species, or likely to result in the destruction or adverse modification of proposed critical habitat? EBI utilized the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation' online project review tool to identify federal -listed threatened and endangered species that are known to occur within the vicinity. EBI also reviewed the USFWS Critical Habitat Portal' online mapping tool to identify critical habitats within the immediate project vicinity. If available, and as applicable, EBI also evaluated State -protected species and habitat data to evaluate whether either might be present in the project vicinity. FINDING Based on EBI's review, suitable habitats capable of supporting one or more of the listed species are potentially present at or near the Project Site. However, based on project design, location and/or the implementation of recommended mitigation measures (Refer to Appendix B for complete details), it is anticipated that the Wireless Facility 'may affect but is not likely to adversely affect' one or more of the identified species. Please refer to Appendix B for further details and relevant supporting documentation. Wilderness Map: https://wilderness.net/default.php httos://www fws.aov/refuges/ Wildlife Refuge Map: haps://www.fws.gov/refuges/ a USFWS IPaC (htto://ecosfws.gov/ipac) USFWS Critical Habitat Portal http://criticalhabitatfws.gov 21P:,_ EBI submitted project details and findings to the regional USFWS field office and requested review in accordance with the provisions of Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA). In a response to EBI's submittal, the USFWS concurred with EBI's determination, stating, "Based on the information you provided and our assessment of potential project impacts, we anticipate that the potential for adverse effects to listed species are discountable (unlikely to occur); we therefore concur with your determination that this project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the Hawaiian hoary bat, Hawaiian goose (nene), Haiwale, Hawaiian petrel, Newell's Shearwater, and band-rumped storm petrel." However: please note, numerous recommendations/avoidance and minimization measures are outlined for each species and are discussed in detail in the response letter located within Appendix B. Additionally, please note that the Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius) has reportedly been recently removed from the federal list of threatened and endangered species and is therefore not included in the consultation analysis with the USFWS. Please refer to Appendix 8 for further details and relevant supporting documentation relative to protected species and habitats. EBI submitted project details and a request for species data and /or comment to the Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW). In response, EBI received the following conservation measures and/or comments addressing concerns relative to the potential impacts of the Wireless Facility: If Hawaiian Goose or Nene (Brenta sandvicensis) are present during construction activities, then all activities within 100 feet (30 meters) should cease, and the bird should riot be approached. Work may continue after the bird leaves the area of its own accord. For nighttime lighting, all lights should be fully shielded to minimize impacts to seabirds. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. 0 any site clearing is required, this should be timed to avoid disturbance during the Hawaiian Hoary Bat or 'Ope'apea (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). Barbed wire should also be avoided for any construction. To prevent the spread of Rapid 'Ohi'a Death (ROD) if 'dhia trees are present and will be removed, trimmed, or potentially injured, DOFAW requests that the information and guidance at the following website be reviewed and followed: https://cms.ctahr.hawaii.edu/rod. DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites, such as in fill. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens e.g. ROD), vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants), or invasive plant parts that could harm our native species and ecosystems. DOFAW recommends consulting the Big Island Invasive Species Committee at (808) 933-3340 in planning, design, and construction of the project to learn of any high-risk invasive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive species. Gear that may contain soil, such as work boots and vehicles, should be thoroughly cleaned with water and sprayed with 70% alcohol solution to prevent the spread of ROD and other harmful fungal pathogens. DOFAW recommends surveying for rare and endangered plants that may occur in the area. Migratory Birds EBI also evaluated the potential of the Wireless Facility to significantly impacts species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). Specifically, EBI evaluated the Wireless Facility against the USFWS's Communications Tower Siting, Construction, Operation, and Decommissioning Recommendations' interim 3 guidance. Further, the provisions of 41.1307(b)(2)(d) of FCC NEPA rules require that an Environmental Assessment must be prepared for any wireless communications tower that exceeds 450 feet above ground level (AGL). Based on a review of the project details, the Wireless Facility meets the USFWS's key tower design and location recommendations. Further, if required, the Wireless Facility will utilize only FAA -mandated lighting systems. As such, it is not anticipated to result in a significant adverse effect to species protected by the MBTA. 2.4 Historic&Archaeological Resources Hi 1307(d)(4)] Will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture, that is listed or is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places? FCC NEPA rules and the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties NPA"; September 2004) set forth several exemptions for wireless projects from review under Section 106 Review of the NHPA. Using the provided project design and location details, as well as a review of records maintained by the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), EBI evaluated whether such an exemption applies to the Wireless Facility. FINDING Based on FBI's review, the Wireless Facility does not meet the necessary criteria set forth in either FCC NEPA rules, the Collocation Agreement, or the 2004 NPA to apply an exemption from Section 106 review. As such, consultation with the SHPO was required. Using the FCC's e-106 system, EBI provided the SHPO with project details, copies of consultation correspondence to date, the results of EBI's evaluation of the potential effects of the project on historic and archaeological resources, and a request for comment. In response to EBI's submittal, the SHPO determined that as proposed, the Wireless Facility will have 'No Effect' on districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering, or culture, that is listed or is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Please note, in the unlikely event that unanticipated Historic Properties, cultural artifacts, archeological deposits, or human remains are inadvertently encountered during the proposed construction and associated excavation activities, all ground disturbing activities must halt immediately and the appropriate local officials and state agencies contacted, in accordance with Federal and State regulations (36 CFR 800.13(b)). 2.5 INDIAN RELIGIOUS SITES [§1.1307(A)(5)] Will the facility affect Indian Religious Sites? FCC NEPA rules and the 2004 NPA set forth several exemptions for wireless projects from review under Section 106 Review of the NHPA, including specifically an exemption from consultation requirements with Native American Indian Tribes. Using the provided project design and location details, as well as a review of records maintained by the SHPO, EBI evaluated whether any such exemption applies to the Wireless Facility. S ht // qov/midwest/endangered/section?/telecomquidance.html 41Pore 5 e FINDING Based on FBI's review, the Wireless Facility does NOT meet the necessary criteria set forth in either FCC NEPA rules, the Collocation Agreement, or the 2004 NPA to apply an exemption from Section 106 review. Therefore, review of the Wireless Facility by federal -recognized Native American Indian Tribes was required. EBI submitted details and supporting documentation regarding the proposed installation using the FCC's Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). EBI then received an automated Notice of Organizations NOO) email generated by the TCNS, identifying federal -recognized Native American Indian Tribes which had been notified of the proposed installation based on geographic areas of interest set by the tribes. A summary of correspondence with interested Tribes identified through TCNS, as well as copies of any pertinent correspondence between EBI and these Tribes, including TCNS emails, follow-up correspondence, and Tribal responses are appended to this NEPA Screening Report. Please note, the below -listed tribe(s) have requested construction monitoring. It is the opinion of EBI and/or the FCC that based on the information reviewed, sufficient justification exists to warrant tribal and/or archaeological monitoring at the Project Site during ground disturbing activities. Office of Hawaiian Affairs With regard to any remaining Tribes identified using the FCC's Tower Construction Notification System TCNS), each has either 0) responded as having no further interest in review; (ii) have pre -established procedures for which the Wireless Facility meets a'no interest' criteria; (iii) have exceeded the mandated comment period; or (iv) requested construction monitoring without specifying an historic property(ies) of concern, or otherwise did not sufficiently support the request. As such, the Applicant's pre -construction obligations are discharged with respect to the monitoring requests made by the remaining federally recognized Native American Indian Tribe(s). 2.6 Floodplains I41.1307(a)(6)] Will the facility be located in a 100 -year floodplain and not be elevated at least one -foot above the base flood elevation? EBI reviewed project details, survey data, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) applicable to the Project Site. Please refer to Appendix B for complete details and a copy of relevant supporting documents. FINDING Based on EBI's review, the Wireless Facility is not located within a 100 -year floodplain. 2.7 Significant Changes to Surface Features [ 11307(a)(7)] Will construction of the facility involve significant change in surface features (e.g., wetland fill, deforestation, or water diversion)? EBI reviewed USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) maps and any other publicly available Geographic Information System (GIS) wetlands mapping resources to identify the presence of known wetlands at or in the vicinity of the Project Site. EBI also reviewed online aerial photography and available Project Site photos, as well as project design and location details provided by the Applicant. Please refer to Appendix B for complete details and a copy of relevant supporting documents. 61v,. J FINDING Based on FBI's review of the above -referenced resources, the development of the Wireless Facility at the Project Site is not anticipated to impact wetlands and will not require the significant removal of trees (Le. deforestation). Therefore, no significant changes to surface features is anticipated. 2.8 High Intensity White Lights in Residential Neighborhoods 1§11307(3)(8)1 Will the Facility be equipped with high-intensity white lights and be located in a residential neighborhood, as defined by the applicable zoning law? EBI reviewed project details provided by the Applicant, as well as local zoning information for the Project Site. FINDING According to the project information provided to EBI, the proposed installation will not be both (i) located in a residential neighborhood and (li) include high intensity white lights. 2.9 Radio Frequency Radiation I§1.13m(b)] Will the facility (operation or transmitter) cause human exposure to levels of radiofrequency radiation in excess of the limits? An Environmental Assessment must be prepared for any installation that will result in human exposure to radio frequency radiation in excess of the limits set forth in §1.1310 and 2.1093 of FCC NEPA Rules. FINDING Please note, an evaluation to determine whether radiofrequency (RF) emissions standards are met was not included as part of this NEPA Screening report. EBI understands that the Applicant will independently evaluate the project to ensure compliance with applicable RF standards. 3.0 LIMITATIONS EBI prepared this NEPA Screening Report using project information provided by the Applicant or an authorized representative. Relevant documents detailing the project (e.g. drawings, surveys, permits, etc.) are appended to this NEPA Screening Report. If the design or location of the installation changes, please contact EBI as additional review and/or consultation may be required. Please note that certain data utilized in the preparation of this NEPA Screening Report is updated periodically and is therefore time sensitive. Such data may include but is not limited to known protected species and habitat information or historic resources that are listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. As such, an update of the data used in this NEPA Screening Report and a re- evaluation of corresponding findings may be necessary should the Wireless Facility not be completed with the time frame applicable to each data set. If provided, EBI also prepared this NEPA Screening Report in part utilizing supplemental supporting documentation (e.g. permits, wetlands delineations, surveys, research, etc.) prepared by third -party consultants directly for the Client. However, please note that EBI did not independently verify the findings of any such supplemental supporting documentation and relies upon such documents as factual and accurate. This NEPA Screening Report was completed according to the terms and conditions authorized by you. There are no intended or unintended third -party beneficiaries to this NEPA Screening Report, unless specifically named. EBI is an independent contractor, not an employee of either the property owner or the project proponent, and its compensation was not based on the findings or recommendations made in the Report or on the closing of any business transaction. Note that the findings of this Report are based on the project specifications provided to EBI and described in this Report. 8I ,, ;; ,. 4.0 SIGNATORIES This NEPA Screening Report summarizes the research, evaluation, and findings of several individual assessments completed to evaluate the potential effects of the proposed Facility on specific resources (i.e. natural, historic, cultural resources). Please refer to those reports (attached) for the qualifications of the respective signatories. Thank you for the opportunity to prepare this NEPA Screening Report and to assist you with this project. Please call us if you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance. Respectfully Submitted, Ms. Melissa Bauer Author/Senior Scientist Id I Ms. Tama Troutman Reviewer/Scientist B Direct# (717) 991-9541 EBI Consulting APPENDIX A: FIGURES C 1 ti ir0 4 0 rl / 1 /1 1 1 1 1 1 t t 1 1 1 1 l •/ ! 1 • / t 1• / 1 S. 1 1 t t 1 1 4 1 r` / rr i i 1 1 11 1 1 f 1 1 r Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P. NRCan. sri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong). Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (44, OpenStreetMap contributors. and the GIS User Community Legend Project Site I t Site Radius at 250', 500', 1000' and '/2 mile Date: 2/3/2020 Figure 1: Site Location Map F. J3345 FA 10553982 LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 PN: 6120001112 agenvironmental I engineering I design EBI Consulting Legend Project Site Site Radius at 250', 500', 1000' and 1/2 mile Date: 2/3/2020 Figure 2 - Topographic Map HIL03345 FA 10553982 LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 PN 6120001112 ai• environmental 1 engineering 1 design EBI Consulting CODE COMPLIANCE NEW e LD LIE' ONO' IC ux OIn2I a5 USDtAICII avPeovEn -_ 1 AT& TeA cooelossase2 h ... wmzao SITE NUMBER; HIL03345 SITE NAME: LEILANI ESTATES SITE TYPE: MONOPOLE/ SHELTER ADDRESS: 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 TMK: ( 3) 1- 3- 001: 007 f AT& T Ist^ y APPROVED 1 Hit PROJECT TEAM VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT P, ESCRWION MtIMOBAJT 1. AT II Am l rpirWOW ha ea r. STALWICele• M. 1, 0F( PRAC, a, NIA-, a . w. n.. v.... GG1 O/ wAli IN m .. r.. 1S aIlyL1L4 WINED n. s u ` SITE INFORMATION GENERA, CQNSRACIgR NOTES DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEE INDEXREVfar,. uu ss.+ weuc d .,< n. riaTZALt10.. 0. minto. rttlicsyc. au ww aum u. n.. mavro+, wmr mn r J, , U1 kBT .° Al .. N. F.. w .,. v., .. ELEv HtLO3345 GENERAL Nota o„,,,, Ww.,*°°. ^'^^,® STATEMENTS G„„„ HM SHEET w,.. 1. m. K.. ,.. 3. a,, n 0. °. T- 1 ti FlaC1001. 401rt ', CMS Ncr, Fm0 ms.... uor4 rrk E.! , 22F SIRUC 0FAL 5 FOADARD{ FOR SG& ,, 11. 04A1001/ 41, AND GNGFGA SUPFORGIG SUFIC rap. F OC Noe.. C. FaCGOGOW., IIPPICIFFOROXMATAFY nutpxo nnemoNFAG{ OF COGCIFTI FACE CC FFASOF. 1 FACE OF STUD FOCT ( RTCFOOINGGAUGE EG AN GONG NC • G• RE MOOD [ CIF FIGGYI Not BOTTCPA OF KCMG C MIFF! C MAIM CONGRUCTICAICOPIIIMIODSPOGO Rims; DOUGLASFAGIAGOGG00. 6400344OOFFELESILOG 01: 30iF NAGEGGIIALR OCR' 9G5 EPOOFJOGANGTOSFea on0.14 FICOLGOIWCHNESOLTMFCIAGICAF MSGELLY1 Nu My CEGIN114C µI f ( GN. RETE BP Acmc lim CAME, 5VMEOLS LEGEND' t J FYICICE DOOR 100400 WOOD, IMF ROI CIENFERL FOOD/ COLLGOI LPG WAG ICTGIFUFG Nseas: E. 517 GOO STCOGIO FE COPIGAPD TIOCCIFICSO TOP OF C0E2 TOP OF vec.. FIN MRGRO. ND FinG AT& T 5! N A3Tau-, iuAE HIL03345 G. HIL03345 73 Iwµan DA WI 314, t GENERAL NOTES GN - 1 a'..: _ _ A a IF anamUa. a jr Ea Phan FORME OE CONESEKRE023e0ae Pea w. cEDARoummt. mews n* E. A, Temt.. aTre Tana; Solna NE Deihl can ay eon PE„ ca Fa la Fa AE nearaan Ty Cann„ w eat an „ a no inana anhhgEne ha NE apahe awe( Dna ehennuee el h De hp Or -„ taxnea pea BF Mao he h AanchweElenhana. F 540. 10 X EACH ran rvry a AT& T. KTI 5 AT& T MOBILITY i. m... 9.. MOGahrauteemaall la s>. w, a< z. elakatelyI a,. Fenn(.-..,.. e....,....” pfrala3 I. _ one rv. 1s . NRf Feehh0 EA env n+-. rvwnwuE 10 n. . n. u., HIL03345 ry . CANCER r. ,..,.- w..,. Pne p"= a nip( nemappeanCeOLLFOCCLOp 610a Peel FRC. Yeaaaeelhe ( Me 9PFP ., Eara ben EanauFaLlea an unm aronwumm ePsuxw, Frv, rn vuSUM, 6. R¢ mu lot] wca KR] lE a, oma .. r. rr., m. a.» un. a, ara, ia COLLPhh. w, aanstahr„,„ 00 Fen/ wenn: INFORMATION al) 1\ I0 TRESPASSING ono, 1234567Elan c paha, " mania P 42,(; AFE „ ha O rvo_ w,. O Property AT& T NOTICE) of Autho zed Personnel Only O - a...,.. w . 22ww.... 224 a. rvo, .," rv,,,, rv. w, AUTHORIZED2pek_ PERSONNEL ONLY M_ WARNING Beyond ThiPointn.. m aannelperapnart „ mh CAUTION Beyond This Paha It FCC m NOTICE u.. , a this v - Fre hery 0„ r;- ra I © 4: 12O © I T. Property of AT& T AuthorizedPersonnel Only HIL03345 Oa 13a , mao, DANGE DANGER) LGM= " MIMES a "` "° r^ SITE SIGNAGE l DIESEL FUEL NO SMOKING NO OPEN FLAMES NOSMOKING Dam now UMON.. o, aeC. ehrvm..» nT, GN - 2 Q:= HA. ro, u„_ rvrz. L 0= 0: ear Ns, NHM, pp. AT& T CSSOCCRD kEL S LP/ PPP: pt. MP Mimi P F 96 4 br 2\ ia,® l PROPOSED nnwn H11. 03345 R AT& T PROJECT AREA k' NEFER TO ENLARGED Siff PLAN ON SHEET A- 2 Q l Or f 2r I* ( 311- LI OW r AV . @gee i. e. Ar PP. a e'? H1103346 HI PPM fl: A 1 SITE PLAN Y t. ta' n. rt+ m mnamntivw gamviwvo: nttewc. d SAT& T tO35 m.,... , I II k I f IW, MLWAF, ama i I I a klr k 141103345 1 1 0A 1 i° v v ma in min ryas eWMut ' WT' j W mreem . M— r$ o 141103345 PAHCA KAIAPANA ROAD M'''''''.• 0118114463rtE+ uN acoaeouNorux 1 A^ 2 COMPOUNDPLAN- N": 2 ENtARGE0SIEPLAN '".," s v,+—, Et+ 1t IT) OCIERIOR 01 UCL[ R TO HVAC up*kCT TM P1) 1. TO MANUFACTU1[ R GaAwm1OS EOAEED FOR AT& T len 0. 1• 11. 1Aril.* MIINA PIGMY PPMi Al 17) CA44. 7. NC ( Ov• AI{ fST V61 Of PSALM NOIAmM. CCOIONICE 7. 41, 7. E AMMO, io. RGMYA/ NT2110 SECTION HUM 2 41. 04 ,, C AS wIlt NTOUE VTALLED 5? R WC 2{ 4. 104 2% 12 3IUS ARITe'. AIASANO STAOOEPD IO FIT. l ALLNITIMPI. Iil1IPTO55 COUP. AID ACCASSDR[ S MOUMIO TO 11! m m0. 0, 011 SHALL EE PANTED 07K74. S. IP) MONOPGlf WALL PANTED MIEN. N„ b,,, 15) N. RASTRUCTURE 41. 4 _ NN SOIID. WL HAWAII3I AAJA°. AEM • UN PPE EAIBNO.. TA6 S GIHE. S) NIT .. OI IPI AMANA V 114747 MOWING FRAME 0 v V ` h; la; Iy Alar IOOo PP) OMR MON Mt lo* I m• NAo[ 1[ IAAIM• ATEI I1II I I I I AC anEmwST11A I 1. 1 EME• soH wV PDWIR 14. • 1RAGS. 0 w RECT/ Ea. DtaSR• Kd Of NOM 11• 111, 43 m DC12RGI9PPAISSOR R AW Mill We D: N H1L03345 WI PI JORW ACal GALLON 11 GALLON IN/. PI REE E TPIGIAN[ R -- .-.,." 1 ,! III t1. j A A y I ICAI: i M. 1A. I. R. PI NAA30FACCSAM ROM 11 UIIIIWIWIH» RORACY IP)' AMP 041741147C11E0 S... I.. E011IASO• SILTIR MOIM® ro 1.4MCv WI EAeE000•• C 155P( O AUNT SwnC11 m NE AMTAGU61E• IMAwH IT. (( C C ICrW h. rAw a m OCR Mt SK( Rte P) 011CO$ AMCTSw105 w, CAAROCR GIT ATOP MIPACE MOI. C[ SI • ASCO COCAS[ WO, ITTI• TOR OP SARIN * LOW m [ tC0 t1o... TO 1 04727, 17 •... PDS • rtt REv OA[ DISCINIDH j rfGH rw' Y. O•' x[ 4 iy` P n) B .. • kt bi I 0 A2• AUM> EQUIPMENT PLAN , I - 12 b \\ \.. •, }/ °•' ice' ,,//// iiN1 / 1 ATV CC6( S01I01 SAG( f. , S S ••• t I- 1 WP. M.C.. T.. IA: IA..) L. \ 1' :, I ' AMP ERCP IONA V. MU MOUNT. ITv.; TOM - Ill PI war RRU, - 9PM SECTOR nOINJ6161ACAC0! mAT& T PAIL AWN. Irv. 3 PIP SECTOR nom 12) 10' i N r__ (___ I j h II I 2r 1I #— A }¢ I 1i E) M e...... E 2a 19. 90 17, H1L03345 MUM ESTATES 113EM PANDA. AU• AHA NO PAEIOA. M 96720 TAW. ( 3) I. 3CDI COT S ! 1 I--. r , w L. III pA 1_, _ }+ - - V FI Slave fit. ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT PUN STIR., 1. orbeet 1 A- 3 DIMENSION PLAN ", _ ='. r. 13 ANTENNA PLAN u : _ ® 4`?,. cl i u n n 0) PREPARED FOR AT& T T0', 8481 ArF IN IAl4• SN NIR6/ N T. ALL IPANTENNAS, WOVEM, COAX ANO ACCBSOffi MOIRTEO TO INE ( FsACCESEDFRS MONOPOLE SNAIL TEPANTEDORFEN, 2 ( PIMONOPOIE SNAIL IFPANTED GREEN. J. ATV RR U' S TAUS, AND SURGEARRESTCRS NOT DEPICTED N INS VEW FOR CLAM. FOR LOCAIIOQ Of RIE; E VOX PLEASE REFER IO PRMOI% PLAIK YEWS WTMIN TNF D4AWNG SET TA Ih MONOPOE STEEL / IP) war PANEL ANTENNAS ELEV. 1TOQ ( AGl. I I. AIL IP) ANIENAS. ROIIPM[ NT. COAX AND MOUNTED TO THE ( PI MDNCPOE SHALL REPAINTED GREEN. 2 ( PI MONOPOIESNALL SE PANTED GREE+. 1 ' AT& T RIIO' S. MN' S AND SURGE ARRESTORS NOT DEN' KI® N INT VIEW ( OR CLARTT. FOR LOCATIONS °, MESE MEAS. PLEASE REFER TO PREVIOUS PLANS VFW3 WIINN DE IXTAWNG SET TO. Ih ASOfI( EL ALE ll/ El / Ih' ATBT PANEL ANTENNAS AL ELEV. IODJ ! AGA-) P A4T PAIRAS9 Ill 1- 1 Ii L R' I I AIaT PANEL AMENIAS RADCETEI Ri ANTENNA 29 E% C LVSON DBTAMCE IVP. ISNOWNAS NCEONLY) PS AT& T PANEL ANTENNA TTP. 3 PER SECTOR ? TOTAL: 121 19)' Alar 107.7NGNMONOPOLENIGH MONOPOLE RI DC POWNL I Ih IeER MLR/ DUCT ROWED SALIN E AEOaCPOIE I. O jP) vlun RILE J. Val: NfRA3TRUCTUR SI 677 ALA MOANUWM9TEE917IpgWLU. / UWM96813 11 M;. RCTO read P E IPI ANTENNA 29 EXCLUSION VATIC!. M. ? SNOWN S REFERENCE ONO) REFERE NPT AT& T PANEL ANTENlA TYP. JRERSKiDRITOTAL 121 a AT& T SASO• HIL03345 CTEC KEDRS: IMM 067271 t9 RIOS REV 0 nIL'! 2l19 10T[ SDI REV DATE DESCRIPIGN.. 01 ANL IOOQ O POWER • PIER pl in T1000. CAKES wine/ 7 RRI4DUCT ROUNDWORM, 01AYDNNDPOLE T. O.( h MAN POLE sN."' '"". wv. w,p^ Pl REV. i2SU' IAG. L. I IP? AT& T Min POLE * Ca OVERHEAD OVERHEAD POWER & ABER h « TAT CABLE ( PI' Mar SATN I, K: E RRGGE EOUPMEN151ELiERlA. SHELTER_ E SL' IA G. L.( T URl4T POLE TOP --- - I OVERHEAD POMP a TREK I1 pi • ATar SN If I EOUIPAIENT MGM L0. 115NB, fER JJ'' IRNW No, HIL03345 LEI LANESTATESMTIMOR PAHOA KMAPANA RD PAMOA, HI 967713 ME: ( 3) 1. 3- 0( 11 407 I_, .'. ELEV. l8d1AG. L) LO. IF) OIARILNK BCE I. I a. EV. IDSIAG. L. 1 r r" I 1 Ip EO. R) CNMtt+ IE MCC J SlreT SRR: gtVAiIONS M. 6'- 0' IAGA. 1 IPI 64 NGN GREEN CHAN INRiENCEW/ PMVACYSLAT' FlWII® CRADE IP) 60 HON GREED- CNANPRTAUCYTE' S PRIVACY TEATS ELEV. 6714. G. L.) r ElNBNEDGRAL> E EFV31: 6- 4 aEV. 80 NPT velar TO' WOECIYARIHINP MCI DGUNESWRIG GATES WI GREEN SLATS SNAP WITAI4: A - 4 EAST ELEVATION K.• 1 2 WEST ELEVATION 1 APPENDIX B: NATURAL RESOURCES REVIEW United States Department of the Interior In Reply Refer to: 01 EPI F00-2020-40417 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boule ard. Room 3-122 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 August 4, 2020 Ms. Kimberly Narel Telecom Environmental Southern California EBI Office 1501 Quail Street #110 Newport Beach, California 92660 Subject: Informal Consultation for the AT&T Mobility LLC Telecommunications Facility in Leilani Estates, Pahoa, Island, Island and County of Hawaii Dear Ms. Kimberly Narel: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received your correspondence on June 22, 2020, requesting concurrence with your determination that the AT&T Mobility LLC Telecommunications Facility in Leilani Estates may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasturus cinereus semotus), the threatened Hawaiian goose (Brenta (—Nesochen) sandvicensis), Haiwale (Cyrtandra nanawaleen.sis), Hawaiian petrel (Plerodroma sandwichen.sis), the threatened Newell's shearwater (Pu/finus auricularis newel)), and the band-rnrnped storm petrel (Oceanodroma castro). This response is in accordance with Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.0 1531 et seq.). Project Description The proposed project consists of the construction of a new telecommunications facility that will consist of a 100 -foot monopole and accompanying utility equipment shelter with a 35 -foot by 30 -foot lease area within a fenced compound with green privacy slats. The equipment shelter will hold a diesel back-up generator, an air conditioner power panel, hybrid racks with surge suppressors, and a cable bridge for power and fiber cable trunks. All equipment shall be painted green to match the surrounding vegetation. An existing utility pole at the Pahoa-Kalapana Road which is approximately 560 feet southeast from the lease will be the Point of Contact for the overhead power and fiber run to the monopole. A 12 -foot wide non-exclusive gravel access route on an existing restricted -usage road will connect the compound site to the Pahoa-Kalapana Road. INTERIOR REGION 9 INTERIOR REGION 12 COLUMBIA—PACIFIC NORTHWEST PACIFIC ISLANDS IDAHO. MONTANA. OREGON*. WASHINGTON AMERICAN SAMOA. GUAM. HAWAII. NORIHERN PAM LAL MARIANA ISLANDS Ms. Kimberly Narel 2 The project site where the facility is proposed is on an approximately 3 75 acre parcel consisting of undeveloped tropical rainforest at an elevation of 1,049 feet above sea level. The project site currently consists of palet trees and other rainforest vegetation along Highway -130 (Pahoa- Kalapana Road). Land immediately surrounding the project site consists of mixed Meiro.sidero.s polymorpha and non-native forest vegetation with ruderal vegetation limited to the margins of the existing road. Low-density commercial developments occur to the north and south while low- density private residential development lies to the west and east. The Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius), a species that was recently removed from the federal list of threatened and endangered species, continues to be State -listed as endangered under HRS 195- D. We acknowledge and appreciate the avoidance and minimization measures that are incorporated into the project for Hawaiian hawk. As the species is not federally listed, the species is not included in this consultation analysis. We recommend you coordinate with the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife, for any further compliance related to Hawaiian hawk. To avoid and minimize impacts to listed species the following applicable measures will be incorporated into the project description: Hawaiian hoary bat The federally endangered Hawaiian hoary bat roosts in both exotic and native woody vegetation across all islands and will leave young unattended in trees and shrubs when they forage. If trees or shrubs 15 feet or taller are cleared during the pupping season, there is a risk that young bats could inadvertently be harmed or killed since they are too young to fly or may not move away. Additionally, Hawaiian hoary bats forage for insects from as low as 3 feet to higher than 500 feet above the ground and can become entangled in barbed wire used for fencing. To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat, the project: Will not disturb, remove, or trim woody plants greater than 15 feet tall during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). Will not use barbed wire for fencing. Analysis ofeffects With the inclusion of the aforementioned avoidance and minimization measures, the Service anticipates adverse effects to Hawaiian hoary bats to be discountable (unlikely to occur). Hawaiian goose The federally threatened Hawaiian goose is found on the islands of Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, and Kauai They are observed in a variety of habitats, but prefer open areas, such as pastures, golf courses, wetlands, natural grasslands and shrublands, and lava flows. Threats to the species include introduced mammalian and avian predators, wind facilities, and vehicle strikes. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian geese, the project: Will not approach, feed, or disturb Hawaiian geese. Ms. Kimberly Narel 3 If Hawaiian geese are observed loafing or foraging within the project area during the breeding season (September through April), a biologist familiar with the nesting behavior of Hawaiian geese, will survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. The surveys will be repeated after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). o All work will cease immediately and contact the Service for further guidance if a nest is discovered within a radius of 150 feet of proposed work, or a previously undiscovered nest is found within said radius after work begins. o In areas where Hawaiian geese are known to be present, the project will post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. Analysis of effects With the inclusion of the aforementioned avoidance and minimization measures, the Service anticipates adverse effects to Hawaiian geese to be discountable (unlikely to occur). Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shearwater, band-rumped storm petrel Hawaiian seabirds may traverse the project area at night during the breeding, nesting and fledging seasons (March 1 to December 15). Outdoor lighting could result in seabird disorientation, fallout, and injury or mortality. Seabirds are attracted to lights and after circling the lights they may become exhausted and collide with nearby wires, buildings, or other structures or they may land on the ground. Downed seabirds are subject to increased mortality due to collision with automobiles, starvation, and predation by dogs, cats, and other predators. Young birds (fledglings) traversing the project area between September 15 and December 15, in their first flights from their mountain nests to the sea, are particularly vulnerable. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to seabirds, the project: Will Polly shield all outdoor lights so the bulb can only be seen from below bulb height and only use when necessary. Will install automatic motion sensor switches and controls on all outdoor lights or tum off lights when human activity is not occurring in the lighted area. Will avoid nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 15 through December 15. Listed seabirds have been documented colliding with communication towers, particularly in areas of high seabird passage rate. In general, self-supporting monopoles are the least likely to result in collisions, whereas lattice towers, particularly those that rely on guy -wires, have a higher risk. To avoid and minimize the likelihood that towers will result in take of listed seabirds, the project: The profile of the tower will be as small as possible while still meeting project needs. The extent to which the tower protrudes above the surrounding vegetation layer and the use of guy wires will be minimized. Ms. Kimberly Narel 4 Will comply with Federal Aviation Administration regulations if the top of the tower must be lit and will use a flashing red light verses a steady -beam red or white light. Seabirds have been known to collide with fences, powerlines and other structures near colonies. To avoid and minimize the likelihood of collision, the project will: Where fences extend above vegetation, the project will integrate three strands of polytape into the fence to increase visibility. For powerlines, guywires and other cables, the project will minimize exposure above vegetation height and vertical profile. Analysis 0/effects The Service has reviewed its files regarding the passage rate of seabirds in the vicinity of this tower. Based on very low passage rate in the vicinity, the height and profile of the tower, and the aforementioned avoidance and minimization measures, the Service anticipates adverse effects to seabirds to be discountable (unlikely to occur). Haiwale Project activities may affect listed plant species by causing physical damage to plant parts (roots, stems, flowers, fruits, seeds, etc.) as well as impacts to other life requisite features of their habitat which may result in reduction of gemination, growth and/or reproduction. Cutting and removal of vegetation surrounding listed plants has the potential to alter microsite conditions (e.g., light, moisture, temperature), damaging or destroying the listed plants and also increasing the risk of invasion by nonnative plants which can result in higher incidence or intensity of fire. Activities such as grazing, use of construction equipment and vehicles, and increased human traffic (i.e. trails, visitation, monitoring), can cause ground disturbance, erosion, and/or soil compaction which decrease absorption of water and nutrients and damage plant root systems and may result in reduced growth and/or mortality of listed plants. Soil disturbance or removal has the potential to negatively impact the soil seed bank of listed plant species if such species are present or historically occurred in the project area. To avoid impacts to listed plant species, the project: Will have a botanical monitor on site should any activities that involve moving heavy equipment over vegetation and/or removal of vegetation to ensure haiwale will not be impacted. The botanical monitor will possess the following qualifications: o Familiarity with the plants of the area, including federal and state -listed species o Familiarity with natural communities of the area, including federal and state -listed natural communities o Experience with conducting floristic field surveys o Experience with analyzing the impacts of development on native plant species and natural communities. Will review the avoidance and minimization measures for plants (Table I) and will be used as a guideline to determine minimum distances from which specific actions will occur from endangered plants, based on the plant form. Ms. Kimberly Narel 5 Table 1. Buffer distances to minimize and avoid potential adverse impacts to listed plants from activities listed below. Action Buffer Distance (feet (meters)) - Keep Project Activity This Far Away from Listed Plant Grasses/Herbs/Shrubs and Terrestrial Orchids Trees and Arboreal Orchids Walling, hiking, surveys 3 ft (1 m) 3 ft (1 m) Cutting and Removing Vegetation By Hand or Hand Tools (e.g., weeding) 3 ft (1 m) 3 ft(1 m) Mechanical Removal of Individual Plants or Woody Vegetation (e.g., chainsaw, weed eater) 3 ft up to height of removed vegetation whichever greater) 3 ft up to height of removed vegetation whichever greater) Removal of Vegetation with Heavy Equipment (e.g., bulldozer, tractor, "bush hog") 2x width equipment + height of vegetation 820 ft (250 m) Use of Approved Herbicides following label) Ground-based Spray Application; hand application (no wand applicator; spot treatment) 0 ft (3 m) Crown diameter Ground-based Spray Application; manual pump with wand, backpack 50 ft (15 m) Crown diameter Ground-based Spray Application; vehicle- mounted tank sprayer 50 ft (15 m) Crown diameter Aerial Spray (ball applicator) 250 ft (76 m) 250 ft (76 m) Aerial Application — herbicide ballistic technology (individual plant treatment) 100 ft (30 m) Crown diameter Aerial Spray (boom) Further consultation required Further consultation required Use of Insecticides (pollinators, seed dispersers) Ground/Soil Disturbance/Outplanting/Fencing (Hand tools, e.g. shovel,'o'b; Small mechanized tools, e.g., auger) 20 ft (6 m) 2x crown diameter Ground/Soil Disturbance (Heavy Equipment) 328 ft (100 m) 820 ft (250 m) Ms. Kimberly Narel 6 Surface Hardening/Soil compaction Trails (e.g., human, ungulates) 20 ft (6 m) 2x crown diameter Roads/Utility Corridors, Buildings/Structures 323 ft (100 m) 820 ft (250 m) Definitions (Wagner et al. 1999) Crown: The leafy top of a tree. Herb: A plant, either annual, biennial, or perennial, with the non -woody stems dying back to the ground at the end of the growing season. Shrub: A perennial woody plant with usually several to numerous primary stems arising from or relatively near the ground. Tree: A woody perennial that usually has a single trunk If listed plants occur in a project area, the avoidance buffers will reduce direct and indirect impacts to listed plants from project activities. However, where project activities occur within the recommended buffer distances, the project will consult with the Service. The project will place temporary fencing or other barriers at the boundary of the disturbance, as far from the affect plants as practicable to reduce impacts to the plants of concent within the buffer area. Analysis ofeffects With the inclusion of the aforementioned avoidance and minimization measures, the Service anticipates adverse effects to haiwale to be discountable (unlikely to occur). Conclusion Based on the information you provided and our assessment of potential project impacts, we anticipate that the potential for adverse effects to listed species are discountable (unlikely to occur); we therefore concur with your determination that this project may affect but is not likely to adversely affect the Hawaiian hoary bat, Hawaiian goose (nene), Haiwale, Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shearwater, and band-rumped storm petrel. Reinitiation of consultation is required and shall be requested by the Federal agency or by the Service where discretionary Federal involvement or control over the action has been retained or is authorized by law and: 1. If new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered; 2. If the identification action is subsequently modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the written concurrence; or, 3. If a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. Ms. Kimberly Narel 7 Thank you for participating with us in the protection of our endangered species. If you have any further questions or concerns regarding this consultation, please contact Eldridge Naboa, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 808-933-6964, e-mail: eldridge_naboar<cfws.gov. When referring to this project, please include this reference numbers: OIEPIF00-20204-0417. Sincerely, Michelle Bogardus Lsland Team Manager Maui Nui and Hawaii island Ms. Kimberly Narel EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 Dear Ms. Narel: STATE OF HAWAII DEP MEN r OF t.AND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE 1151 PUNCHBOWL. STREET. ROOM 125 HONOLULU. HAWAII 96113 July 9, 2020 LkNDSTATEPAPJCS Log no. 2703/2693) The Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) has received your inquiry regarding review of the Natural Resources Review for the proposed wireless communications facility in Pahoa on the island of Hawaii, Hawaii, TMK: (3) 1-5-010:009. The proposed project consists of constructing a 100 -foot telecommunications monopole and an accompanying utility equipment shelter within a fenced compound on previously undeveloped land. We appreciate the inclusion ofconservation measures mentioned in the Natural Resources Review intended to avoid construction and operational impacts to State listed species such as the Hawaiian hawk (`lo), Hawaiian hoary bat (`dpe`ape`a), Hawaiian goose (nene) and Cyrtandra nanawaleensis (Ha`iwale). DOFAW provides the following additional comments on the potential of the proposed work to affect listed species in the vicinity of the project area. The State listed Hawaiian Goose or Nene (Branta sandvicensis) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the proposed project site. It is against State law to harm or harass these species. If any of these species are present during construction activities, then all activities within 100 feet (30 meters) should cease, and the bird should not be approached. Work may continue after the bird leaves the area of its own accord. If a nest is discovered at any point, please contact the Hawaii Island DOFAW office at (808) 974-4221. We note that artificial lighting can adversely impact seabirds that may pass through the area at night by causing disorientation. This disorientation can result in collision with manmade artifacts or grounding of birds. For nighttime lighting that plight be required, DOFAW recommends that all lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. This is the period when young seabirds take their maiden voyage to the open sea. For illustrations and guidance related to seabird -friendly light styles that also protect the dark, starry skies of Hawaii please visit: https://dlnr.hawaii.eov/wildlife/files/2016/03/DOC439.pdf. The State listed Hawaiian Hoary Bat or'Ope`ape`a (La.siuras cinereus semotus) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. If any site clearing is required this should be timed to avoid disturbance during the bat birthing and pup rearing season June 1 through September 15). Barbed wire should also be avoided for any construction because bat mortalities have been documented as a result of becoming ensnared by barbed wire during Flight. To prevent the spread of Rapid `Ohi`a Death (ROD), if `Shi'a trees are present and will be removed, trimmed, or potentially injured DOFAW requests that the infonnation and guidance at the following website be reviewed and followed: https: icros.ctahr.hawaii.edu/rod. DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites, such as in fill. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens (e.g. Rapid `Ohi`a Death), vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants), or invasive plant parts that could harm our native species and ecosystems. We recommend consulting the Big Island Invasive Species Committee at (808) 933-3340 in planning, design, and construction of the project to team of any high-risk invasive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive species. Gear that may contain soil, such as work boots and vehicles, should be thoroughly cleaned with water and sprayed with 70% alcohol solution to prevent the spread of Rapid `Ohi`a Death and other harmful fungal pathogens. DOFAW recommends surveying for rare and endangered plants that may occur in the area. If any of these species are found, please notify DOFAW at (808) 587-0166. We appreciate your efforts to work with our office for the conservation of our native species. Should the scope of the project change significantly, or should it become apparent that threatened or endangered species may be impacted, please contact our staff as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact Lauren Taylor, Protected Species Habitat Conservation Planning Coordinator at (808) 587-0010 or lauren.tavlor@hawaii.aov. Sincerely, DAVID G. SMITH Administrator Natural Resources Review LEILANI ESTATES / HIL03345 FA 10553982 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road Pahoa, Hawaii 96778 EBI Project No. 6120001112 June 19, 2020 Prepared for: AT&T Mobility, LLC 2600 Camino Ramon San Ramon, CA 94583 Prepared by: AEBI Consulting A environmental I engineering I due diligence EBI Consulting environmental f engineering { due diligence 21 B Street Burlington. MA 01803 Tel: (781) 273-2500 Fax: (781) 273-3311 www.ebtansuiting.com June 19, 2020 Subject: Natural Resources Review for a Proposed Wireless Communications Facility Leilani Estates t HIL03345 FA 10553982 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Pahoa, Howell, HI, 96778 19' 26' 23.778" / 154' 56' 4246" EBI Project No. 6120001112 OVERVIEW EBI Consulting (EBI) has prepared this Natural Resources Review (NR Review) for the above -referenced proposed wireless communications facility (herein, the Facility). This NR Review supports a National Environmental Policy Act NEPA) review of the proposed Facility, completed in accordance with Federal Communications Commission FCC) NEPA implementing procedures set forth in 47 CFR 1,1301-1.1320. The purpose of this NR Review is to determine whether further environmental review may be required in accordance with 47 CFR 1.1307(a)(1), (2), (3), (6). and (7) of FCC NEPA Rules. Specifically, this NR Review focuses on evaluating whether the proposed Facility will result in potential significant impacts to federally -protected lands, species, flood zones, or other significant changes to surface features. EBI prepared this NR Review using readily -available online resources and visual observations made during EBI's field survey. This NR Review is designed to provide a baseline evaluation of the potential for the proposed Facility to significantly affect the above -referenced natural resources (including protected species) and to determine if additional review, specialized on-site surveys, or consultation is required. PROJECT SUMMARY As of the date of this NR Review, the proposed project consists of the construction of a new communications facility. Specifically, the proposed installation will consist of a 100 -foot monopole and accompanying utility equipment shelter with a 35 -foot by 30 -foot lease area within a fenced compound with green privacy slats. The prefabricated equipment shelter will hold a diesel back-up generator, an AC power panel, hybrid racks with surge suppressors, and a cable bridge for power/fiber cable trunks. All equipment shall be painted green to match surrounding vegetation. An existing utility pole at Pahoa Kalapana Road approximately 560 feet southeast from the lease area will be the POC for the overhead power/fiber run to the monopole. A proposed 12 -foot wide non- exclusive gravel access route on an existing restricted -usage road will connect the compound site to Pahoa Kalapana Road. Please see the attached site drawings for complete details. PROPERTY AND VICINITY DESCRIPTION The property on which the Facility is proposed (herein, the Subject Property), is an approximately 3.75 -acre parcel, consisting of undeveloped tropical rainforest at an elevation of 1,049 feet above sea level. The area of the Subject Property on which the installation is proposed (herein, the Project Site), currently consists of palm trees and other rainforest vegetation along 1-11-130 (Pahoa Kalapana Road). Land immediately surrounding the Project Site consists of mixed 'dhi'a (Metrosideros po&ymorpho) / non-native forest vegetation, with ruderal vegetation limited to the margins of the existing road. Low-density commercial developments lie to the north and south, while low-density private residential development lies to the west and east FEDERAL LANDS REVIEW EBI reviewed available online mapping resources to determine if the proposed Facility location is inside the boundaries of, or within one mile of certain classifications of federal land. Applicable data is depicted on EBI's 'Land Resources Map' (see attached). The following table summarizes EBI's review. FEDERALLY -PROTECTED LAND jurisdictional Agency / Resource Within Boundary Withal l mile Not Within 1 mile Wilderness Area [47 CFR §1.1307(a)( I)] National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS) National Park Service (NPS): U.S. Forest Service (USFS); U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS); Bureau of Land Management (BLM) https://www.arceis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a415bca07fOa4bee9fOe894bOdb5c3 b6 0 0 0 Wildlife Preserve [47 CFR §I. 1 307(a)(2)] National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS) NPS; USFS: USFWS; BLM https//www.fws Rov/refuges 4 Wild & Scenic Rivers NPS; USFS; USFWS: BLM http://www.rivers gov 0 04 National Scenic Trails NPS and Managing Systems and Trails Organization (MSTO) https//www.nos.gov/subjects/ natio naltailssystem/national-scenic-trai1s.htm 0 0 4 Based on a review of the above -referenced resources, the proposed facility is not located within the boundaries o, or within one mile of any of the above -referenced federal lands. PROTECTED SPECIES REVIEW Federally Listed Species and Critic& Habitats Pacific Islands Department of Fish and Wildlife (http://www.fws.gov/pacificislands) must be consulted to identify species that are federally listed or proposed for listing under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), and that are known to occur within the project vicinity; the USFWS Information for Planning and Consultation' (IPaC) online project review tool is not available for the state of Hawaii. Based on consultation by the Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, 75 federally -listed (i.e. endangered or threatened) animal species and 424 federally -listed plant species are known to occur on the Island of Hawaii. Further, EBI's review identified one federally -proposed species on Hawaii. Additionally, EBI utilized the USFWS online Critical Habitat Portalz online mapping tool and determined that the proposed Facility location is not within a designated critical habitat. State Protected Species EBI also reviewed online resources maintained by the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources http://dInr.hawaitgov/dofaw/) to identify any state -protected species that are known to occur within proximity of the proposed Project Site. Based on EBI's review of these online resources, 43 state -listed species are known to occur on the Island of Hawaii. A Biological Assessment (attached) of the Project vicinity was conducted to determine species within the immediate vicinity of the Project Site. Based on this Biological Assessment, there are four protected species known to occur in the area. USFWS Information and Consultation URL: http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac 2 USFWS Critical Habitat Portal URL: httpd/criticalhabitatfws.gov A review of the identified species identified in the Biological Assessment, and their associated habitats with respect to the proposed location of the Project Site, is provided in the following table. SPECIES LISTING Common Name Scientific Name) FEDERAL / STATE STATUS HABITAT DESCRIPTION DETERMINATION OF EFFECT Hawaiian hawk Buret) solitarius) SE Known to inhabit a broad range of forested areas throughout the Island of Hawaii. Breeding Season is between March I — September 30th. Depends on native forest for nesting from sea level to 6.530 feet above mean sea level (amsl). This is the only broad -winged hawk that breeds on the Big Island, in trees greater than 30 feet tall. May Affect, but Unlikely to Adversely Affect- The Project Site contains potential Hawaiian hawk nesting and foraging habitat. Hawaiian hoary bat Lasiurus cinereus semows) FE / SE Roosts in both exotic and native woody vegetation taller than 15 feet, foraging in trees and shrubs from as low as 3 feet from the ground to higher than 500 feet. Birthing and pup rearing season fall between June I't — September 15th This elusive bat is found primarily from sea level to 13,000 feet msl on the Island of Hawaii. May Affect, but Unlikely to Adversely Affect- The Project Site contains potential Hawaiian hoary bat roosting and foraging habitat. Hawaiian goose nene, Brants sandvicensis) FE / SE Prefers open areas such as pastures, golf courses, beach strands, wetlands, natural grasslands, shrublands, and lava Bows. Breeds from September — April. Ranges from coastal lowlands to alpine areas. Known to occur from sea level to 7,600 feet msl. Nests on the ground in ruderal vegetation. May Affect, but Unlikely to Adversely Affect- The Project Site contains potential Hawaiian goose nesting and foraging habitat, Ha iwaleCyrtandra nanowoleensis) FE / SE This plant species is endemic to lowland wet forests in the Puna District on the Island of Hawn, typically occurring in the forest understory. May Affect, but Unlikely to Adversely Affect- The Project Site is within known range of this listed species. FE = Federal Endangered; FT = Federal Th eatened; FP = Federal Proposed; 0-1 = Critical Ho SE = State Endangered; ST = State Threat ned; SP = State Proposed itat Please note that identified protected species which require strictly aquatic or anchialine habitats (e.g. fish) were not included in the table above, as no such habitat is present at the proposed Project Site. As noted in the table above, suitable habitats capable of supporting one or more of the listed species were noted at the proposed Project Site. However, provided conservation measures detailed in the attached Biological Assessment are implemented. These measures include the following: On-site construction/tree clearing should be performed outside of March lit to September 15th to avoid impacts to Hawaiian hawk and hoary bat. If construction must take place between March 1^ and September 15h, a nest clearance survey should take place within 14 days prior to construction. No trees taller than 15 feet should be trimmed or removed between March 1 st and September 15th in order to minimize impacts to the Hawaiian hoary bat. A botanical monitor should be on site during any activities that involve moving heavy equipment over vegetation and/or the removal of vegetation to ensure the ha'iwale is not impacted. The Hawaiian goose (nene) breeding season is from September to April; this species' breeding season begins as the Hawaiian hawk and hoary bat's breeding seasons end. As such, if any nene are observed foraging or loafing within the project site during their breeding season, a biologist familiar with the nesting behavior of nene must survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. All Project personnel must follow the biosecurity protocol when operating on Hawaii Island to prevent the introduction of harmful invasive species to local natural areas (detailed in the attached Biological Assessment). Provided these conservation measures are followed to minimize construction impacts, it is anticipated that the proposed installation 'may affect, but is unlikely to adversely affect the identified species. Migratory Bird Treaty Act Consideration should also be given to the potential impacts of the construction and ongoing operation of the proposed Facility, on species protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA; 16 U.S.C. 703-712). The USFWS issued "Recommended Best Practices for Communications Tower Design, Siting, Construction, Operation, Maintenance and Decommissioning'3to provide avoidance and minimization measures to reduce the risk of avian mortality as a result of communications towers. The proposed tower will be a 100 -foot monopole with no lighting. As such, it meets most of the USFWS's tower siting and design recommendations and is therefore not anticipated to adversely affect migratory birds. Bald 8 Golden Eagle Protection Act The Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA; 16 U.S.C. 668-668d) prohibits the "taking" of bald and golden eagles in the absence of a permit issued by the Secretary of the Interior. Based on EBI's on-site observations, assessment of habitat, and review of publicly -available occurrence data, the proposed installation is not anticipated to result in the "take" of any Bald or Golden Eagles. No further review is required. FEMA FLOOD ZONE Based on EBI's review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map www.fema.govi Map# 1551661430F; dated 09/29/17), the proposed facility is located within an area identified as Zone X, and therefore is not located within a 100 -year floodplain. As such, in accordance with §I.1307(a)(6) of FCC NEPA Rules, an Environmental Assessment is not required. SIGNIFICANT CHANGES TO SURFACE FEATURES Wetlands EBI did not observe any readily -identifiable wetlands or wetland characteristics in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site (e.g. standing water, hydrophytic vegetation, soil saturation and inundation, drainage patterns and sediment deposition, watermarks and drift lines on trees and vegetation, or water stained leaves). A review of the USFWS National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map (see attached) did not identify any wetlands in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site. EBI also reviewed the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation Service NRCS) Web Soil Survey (WSS) for the Project Site and immediate vicinity. According to EBI's review, soils at the Project Site consist of I) Olaa cobbly hydrous loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes, and 2) Malama extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material, 2 to 40 percent slopes. 1) is well -drained soil that supports a water table greater than 80 inches with a restrictive layer 26 to 39 inches to lithic bedrock. 2) is also well -drained soil supporting a water table greater than 80 inches, with a restrictive feature 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock. These soils are not listed as hydric by the NRCS (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/main/soils/use/hydric/). Based on EBI's review as summarized above, the proposed communications facility installation is not anticipated to impact wetlands. r 3 https://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/pdf/managementlusfwscommtowerguidance.pdf FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Based on the results of EBI's review as summarized herein, the proposed communications facility: May affect, but unlikely to adversely affect' listed protected species, provided conservation measures summarized in the report above are implemented; Is not within the boundaries of, or within one mile of federally -protected land (i.e. wildlife preserves, wilderness areas. etc.); i Is not within the boundaries of a FEMA -designated IOO.year flood zone: and Is not anticipated to result in a significant change to surface features. EBI is an independent contractor, not an employee of either the property owner or the project proponent, and its compensation was not based on the findings or recommendations made in this Review or on the closing of any business transaction. Sincerely, 6-N Ms, Kimber ly Narel Ms. Ayoola Folarin Biologist 1 Biologist Direct# (619) 405.8459 Attachments: Figures & Drawings Photographs Species Review Documentation Supporting Documentation Qualifications FIGURES & DRAWINGS r 1 i w 1 / 1 / / .. • s` l 1 1 / 1 1 1 /ryw ll 1t 1 1 1 1* t 1 1 w., ! 1 1 i 1 I 1 i 1 / w 1 1 w / 1 11 Amp. - 0 G S s. l 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 kJ d / w / t/ mJOrro r Obe NOW s 400 1- Sources: Esri, HERE. Garmin, USGS, Intermap. INCREMENT P, NRCan,'Esri Japan. METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) Ra, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community • Legend Project Site Site Radius at 250', 500', 1000' and 1/2 mile Date: 2/3/2020 Figure 1: Site Location Map i _03345 FA 10553982 LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 PN: 6120001112 Aenvironmental 1 engineering 1 design EBI Consulting C P Legend Project Site Coy r,ght7:©20;1 va oa eogra13ehic8ociety.i-cub:; Site Radius at 250', 500', 1000' and 1/2 mile Date: 2/3/2020 Figure 2 - Topographic Map HIL03345 FA 10553982 LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 PN 6120001112 OblA environmental I engineering I design N EBI Consulting CODE COMPLIANCE RO' fI9, rOA1. OrSCRPRON: NEW BUILD LTE ONLY 1C: MRSDL021465 mD USID: 141011 FA 0001: 10553982 PREPARED FOR AT& T sx / ANE W AN WE vat AN w woo J Alt wORA AND ANTERNLS Smut E REwORMLO AND EWALIp N WIN114EE 60v RNREG AuTN TN! FONCWNGCoo6 ASAOOP1f0SY REITHEC CURRENTIN % Of TN! P NOWIGWNG N s ADOPTED 17 N6l PLANS 6 TO SECOLmnRD 10 PERIM WON KO CONFORANG TO MSE CODES. 7001P1RrN71DNU SUIDPaC CODE RIIM LOCM PARDONING 7012 NAT07ML ERG PROTEC RON ASSOCM D, a WP411 VS S NITNNARONK ENERGY < ONSliV ATION CODE APPROVED By RPM ' I aro N 1 k55 APR, Aug M, 201E AT& T SITE NUMBER: HIL03345 SITE NAME: LEILANI ESTATES SITETYPE: MONOPOLE/ SHELTER ADDRESS: 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 TMK: ( 3) 1- 3- 001: 007 y5+ h-.. 7A5TRUCTURk 427 ALA MGANA, LYo. 5TE917 K. INOWLU. HAWM9013 N- 1 APPROVED 1y Danny D/ U•,•• W • aN2971• l/ I01 NR. Aug 211, 10/ 9 D A16T 3,T• O' HIL03345 PROJECT TEAM VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION APPLIC/ SM/ IESSEQ E GSMSRK»+. ATM Mfyltrf 6 MRA9RUCURE PARNE66 SO) u1HUAVEO! CONTACT OOMNC COOPER PROPOSED WENAND OI w UNMANNED TOECOMMUNCATOG FAC1111. CWSQINGp1HlPdLOWNb IOMR/ AMfMM1OR ANN 11, BC CmEC. W 61: ow p a 6. • w N... a .. r NIO ilE• IN uvC vac.. 0 R BIG ISLAND OF HAWAII w MtALIATON( I) ImA7 TAU PACHDPOLE w NSTAUA0OR/ 0f 117) Al& TWmOANRERNS w MTALLAROrd ISHDC* PAGESI PITESADCS YR M 31 w MEAL/ ATKIN OF IR GAS SURGES: NREiX` RS w NSEALLA1K7m 0111 G• 3 AHIENA w NSfTrR1 TACO AN ATV 3S0' A 37- 6- 11050 SO FT I IfLECOMMUNCARON CONFOUND LEASE AREA w NSIALLARONCP6' d NIGH GREEN CHAN UNE FENCING w/ GREW PRIVAC r S1ATS w 1751AIAAPON 01 I1I A PEFAWITC. ATED EOUPMEM SNWOPE w NSIALUTiON O. 111 MENTI CAT2POENERAIOR w NSTAUATION Or 1111701 AC POW6! PANEL711 w NSIAl1AfK) t1Or 11101111 EMERSON POWER MM RACE w/ 1121 CAMEO w NSIALLATON Or T21 TWSRORACrS w NSIALLATFON OP 111 N. .* w/ UTE. EMINENT w MIAWI1pN OF IIIC AWE IDLERA 1e nAn w NSIAILMION Or 3310012 SLOG( SUPPRESSORSWt. RACK w,' AaLLAN. NP6ib9 OA AL c0. 7 M NSI AnICD CGIFONYCLOIAwNGR A11r14_ 151 P1ANN( t 1 03, 27/ 19 NDS REV 0 OANC/ N IOD110t A 64R/ 19v01S' A Nv G4 DESCRIIKN CONTACT: DAN./ DIOEGRSON COMACI VAMESSA AE70R EMU 001971AR. COM 12.. A4,. RP2a00teT. aMI PO 1503, M - 076I NE1S001af9363... cow. RE f270RlIBN_ TONi+ Q Atl1MOWW 6 NEACT: NDO POWERS IANCONTACT: YLINRAfA COMKI: AIWNWSo. tow a WAR 6IER EWA WAR 6. 62. 1266N. 66 Pw RRIw5661 PH 15011• 274710 ASCNIECI/ 770* W: CL. S. 0. GR L.,-..... \ SNINSIRUCIUIEPARDERS A M1A1INCWURE P01117 coMac1. NOSE M. MRANOA COMACI: MCE NOVA7 MVP PnbM0( 1151000m ( MAL Marastyr corn 011 19191 20- 7767 M 1606) AST . Z60 SITE INFORMATION GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEET INDEX REV. PROPERTY OWNER: SANPORDS SRVKE CWEN RTC IY2676EfMWAHOA RDPAL PMfOA N 16776 N{ R6pa^ tOM COUNTY OFINwN sisO LOAD 106SIT1 E> SOCO00US1111. 3 lVOf1PF GAGCWf: C Sl6MC7ONE A FLOOD7GKE. x INK •- 1- aOaDw 10/ NG' AGRIC1ILME AG - A20 IAMIMX 04. 0 ISS: . 9• 26' 21/ Ft NTI, LONd1UDE SHAD 611. 15a• SR A2AOD- W A FACILITY DO Not l At rDRA, TANGS1. 1 Y( R• Y AlA: L FLAN! PLANSAPE TO * MD I* 00 070a HE PyW5A10DMRK. OAE1411aJt6 AND COrdlpr6 ON RE 1067 MaD 91ALL AWEOYRt7 n01.. 1TE ARORE< TENGIN FER N www. CA ANY DIXJGPAW_ 3W3WOW PROM CNIC' WM TTE rrON OR M. ses. OS09S Ot M RISNMSME SY PE UAE pRECrOtE FRt' MHW AnORt 1050 mtEuwADA V. IQO. N9b' D WAD NORRWW$ TOH AEPOR R0tl0JUAINOAii 1100 ASOu') 11 2 1Lbr LEGE ONTO KIIAUWAT NLTROTTO/ ObEyA AVE 1 COMPUE10 POUOw N- 1IMAwY lalm a LITE LW 2 EAkQ TO UMW, WO Kt10/ RFMU' MBA WASSRD S COMNUE TO POISON TAT 36 MI WO CO, NJmk1 GM] 717 SGWGt-. 7:—. 17,'"•."-'...".•=.' AI SRI PLAN 112 WA/ IG® SREPWa 0014: `/ DPUN, 1-172-- 751i. 7.7.41::: 4-: w10NN 1EOUERPE6T 8701 M d( VARCNS 09: 16, HIL03345 IEILAM ESTATES 113520 PANE+ A 44. 1AP414A110 PAHOA. H196776 FMK'{ 311-} ODIA07 2 GENERAL NOTES 6. AT THEIR FFICCRCLE. 0001811 $ 1800HTONTO 71170/ P0170WASSro CON11/ 11E 10 FOLLOW NI O INF TACO,. 6 utAN1ED AND NOT FOR HUMAN NMIIAIION. A TL< IN0171 WILL N 0 SR 1SR P NE ASN/ YARID108 POtANE MAN1E1NtICE. Nf rf01[ CI WEI NOI RE{ NfNANf SGNPICA 11 NMI/ RANC. E OR MCI ON DRAINAGE: NO SANITARY SEWN, S1RVICE POTAIIE WATER. OR RASH dIPOlu 5; MONED MO NO CO.». Er' ML TTONAGE IS PROPOSED, UPRI RGM v R11RICIEDVSAGlf000 10. OESTINARCN wll IE ON NE RGM 00177117777000 870NTS 1UWMIN[ D! l] UPAYFTE SPACE NOl N1I100 FOR TMMAN INMATION AIC CORY REOUBIeLY vRTED R MAINTENANCE PERSoNAL. 0037 6Ncn SICA EOPS S< 7006 SECTION 1103. 29 MOVIM0411s717saft 10. 55 OWNER 0761 POWRM, MCT NELCO RFDS008000. 1/ µ0l TRENTON! AGENCY: HAWAIAN IELMICO5. 1111010. 10.. DWI/ 19. c4141411...11 STATEMENTS 5N.• t Tiy. TITLE SHEET OIIICMAI ANNL1366 NOT wuNN ITE SCOPE C. wOlA C. iMAPED NM ONWNGS SR RNnnt119S6CO EYIMG AND/ ON PROPOSE 0 CONPOMOT TS. REFER IO STRUCTURE ANALOG MOWED TAGER WARM CDvERNOr 1.. EM ZONE Cf WNW 001414 RED NN6 MAMEI ANTENNA W1 ANTEA. SEI. POR MAIMS OF MOUNT TO SUPPORT MING . t40/ 0* P9OP000 COMPONENTS. ERR 10 ANIFNN0 MOUNT STRUCTURAL ANALY66* ROW10000ER3E1APAMT cove*. 0 • L 800 - 2 2600 co 7TAnA„ T K. e, r: rtbw: \ T - J ocur• GRnuiREMENTI MANIC tECI9N110 • 01 ESP I' VE CIXICRETE DOOILIDEPARIvEnt • 025(' tr• GLAS TP 0. 0E0 - HIL03345 eAT& T AT& T MCNILIIY DANGER NO TRESPASSING NOTICE AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY INFORMATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 Property of AT& T Authonzed Personnel Only O EDANGERD DANGER-) DIESEL FUEL GAD AGM IATT1 S NO SMOKING NO OPEN FUMES NO SMOKING P operly of AT& T AuthorizedPersonnel Only L r - I eAT& T WARNING Be2ood This POInlyou are E . E. PWOM22ceed The ! CC nel122112: 21F2p2Silit limos CAUTION Beyond This Poi nf. ou are 22. 22112 2221222Ins 2112 22221 2122121... a 1, 11111111212111121. 11111• 1 NOTICE Beyond MTi: Poli, 2212- L123221. 11. 22 may u2222d the PC( 23222. 2i 22221222n 2112111MC 21212112222. 22. 1122. 222, 22. 2. 221. 2. 122122 UCH • 2212 91ESEAF PE2D• 202122 2^ C 22 2221k . 2N AT& T HIL03345 I2 RIDS REV 12 100% 1T2 122 H1103345 LEIL• 111 WATTS SITE SIGNAGE GN - 2 T w ` , - 2% 3/ § \ /( 2/./». \©_ N./ AT& T ED POSED 0‘ 1, 410 A., 2 \ r'° t r 7 =, yH1103345 ofr HI 4. 5778m, poi y- 1I r p VAT& T 1 MI Is Ar UlPh. COAX my ME 1, 1 W 9s i=.. w ," tY-- i. f•. IYA, ImI wi L—"" . a.— ry Iri Arm. uo Ir wa Vi AT Xi sa —`_ rs II I 6,,..,. .' 1.,.., a; K ' art ATI, Te. 111103345 HERwee r e« ssrvn uw ' I 1 mn., vmry v.. I W q e HILO3345 e an. IPalne a ,,,,„` w r e W.,. aa, PR 1: M fe T* Y44. W% m2 I t e.. r ..___ PAHOA KAIAPANA ROAD m. ENLARGE() SITE PLAN I, COMPOUND PON COMPOUND PLAN 2 ENEARGED SITE PLAN , w... r u I I IP) GPS , UFENIn TACNNED TO EVERIOR OP SSELIER 155 HVAC IPIR TSP. REFER TO MANUFACTURERDRAWINGS C PREPARED TOR AT& T MOCATELU AVE.* T,ARAIB NIRdl9 l Ng1ET. All IPI CARL/ 11G AND EGLI.. 140FF NSTAIIED AND USED N ACCORDANCE ' MN THE PRODUCTS NLIIDEDINSTRUCTIONS LRING ANDIOR LASELNG REOUIREMEMS. PER NEC SECTION 1IG318I. 2. ALL 0) CA PWG CONFORMSWRIL AND G TO BE PTALLED PER NEC 356. 106 356. 12. 3. RRVS ARE SIAS. ED AND STAGGERED TON! S. ALL P) ANTENNAS. EOUPMENT, COAX. AND ACCES$ ORILS MOUNTED TO THE 1F1 MONOPOLE SHALL BE PNMED GREEN 5. IPJ MONOPOLE 3NAiL EE PA! MEC GREEN V - y. J514RASTRIATURE 622 AU AIOANA & AD. AE 91 I 1KJNd. UEU, HAWAII 96813 N P 5 OiiIP IP) PPE EXTENSION. ...' TYP. ITOIAl3J fg OESR' N BY OTHERS) y Ih ANTENNA V. BG01A O MOUNTNGFRAAE j / IQQ,JfT-'''', W `/ R • ' c--\\ 1\' 4 j{ j. :. 1.%%% T. ... 1 . 1 :, `*. 4 1 1111 WI 51 MOO 16011 MONOPOLE A`\ NI GENERATORtiEL BOY I 1f- NT) FTAERSON- eV POWER RIANT I RMIO, E IVELASARMPAtE' L 1 J RAGA 90ERSAND i RECIEERS AND RNG5 IRI lr>•\_.. 11 R- 1- Of MAN BATTEMESSURGE IIII IPI 73KW AC GDMERAOR W; IIIBGALLON IAN( i ME DffNGVWER b I FSS 1 S, TTTA IrTT. ONPE roRE VJ.. Sr M L f—: I. -- — I N. I- iI AC I Fry FRES O SUPPRESSOR ) RACE TTDTAWJ ISI CABLE WIRY. P/ P. P) NYBHORA(% rtOlAL- 2) P) I w6630miN8ASEBAIRo U. wlnw NrelnDRncK ATu51N O. HIL03345 IPS . tL" nom.''' TTT L_ . I " 195 T — WI' AT6P PREF... CATE° SATN I. EOUPTE. SNli1ER MOUNRO1' 0 RAISED CONCRETE PAD I I Fry LC WI I ADTOMATICTRANSFER SMTO1 IFI IRCO BOX IPI IBE EX, NGL181ER ORA WNBr 15C CNN_ TED Sr 1MM IPI DRSEL FUR STRATI 1.) 4WD CONCRETE 5100P r IPI DBCONNECT SwsOI W/ CAMLOCK GENERATOR PPERFACFMOUNIED EPIFRTORCASRELIERBELOW IPI IRCO BOARD TO t x11 ! 1S PTDT RET•' A 07/...( Z: I. ' AJF70. P . Art aSCRNi0N/ PA® P/ • T v 1 O I . MWUSECR, EQUIPMENT PLAN I 2 776' Ij` ti — lx / 1 {'. A. 1 IPI AM, DC61fOSF) SURGE . ., SUPPRESSOR. IY' 1fOTESI 7 _ u : 1 PI ' AT& T BACK to. OCK '. maw ttP. ITg1. LL. 18) 6•' IE' OR001Mir M9PR SECTOR ro, udlla, ACUD) ITP` 3PAETR SICTOR( TOTTL 121 T- 10 10, 7" U:' c r 3. 7 I, 7J' t. T IJ 7 4 J,.. 7:"..;:°,;: r•,.--- 3.. t.=„ r w... c. l SS wI ) CR ” R A 4.,: '' 7d' RVw for HIL03345 1'I "# G OERANC AF( AUPA IA PD PAHOA, W 9677a TMK: 0) 1 - 3- 001 409 A.-- 4 L 7. r I--._.__..._. .... ..._..........._...._............._...,..._.. I 10. 10' w11R4. `, ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT PLAN 3R011100b5. A- 3 J DIMENSION PLANS I' 3 ANTENNA PLAN = - - T u e PERMED FOR AT& T 930 fAN1V AV.', MIOLAN NIa67M R: 1. lull% AMBNMS. EO1MMEM. COA% AND Alx( 3} GIRp$ AggN1Ep TO THE IP) MONOPOLE SHALL SE PANTED GREEN. 2 ( P) MONOPOLE SHALL OE PANTED GREEN. a ' Afar REU' ST SAS. AND SURGE ARRESEORS NOT DENTED N TEN NEW FOR CLARITY. f04 LOCATMN60i THESE nava. PEASE REFER TO PRENCt15 PLANS YEWS WORN r[ RAwHG SE, 1.0. IPI MONOPOLE STEEL 1 I%' ATar PANEL ANTENNAS ` ELEV. IOOd IAG. L) NOTEAll l% AMEN AS EOO1011 COAX. AND ACCESSORIES MOUNTED OR MONOPOLE SHALL RE PMN(® GREEN. M ERCER: WM SNAIL SE PARREO GREEN 1101 RRU' STMA' S AND SURCEARR[ STORf NOT CRAVED H TEM YEW ECR OWN.. FOR LOCATIONS OF THESE FENS. PLEASE FEELER TO PREVId1EPWNSVEAl . 1, e4 THE HAWING SET TO, STEEL ( RE Flat PANEL ArL1EENAs If/. 1004 ( AGL. 1 1A16r! AN0. ANIFNM$ RAD CEMER , y RA6, 0CIA. TEL AT& T PANE! ANIEtNAS RAD CEMBt .` v9IdV: SINi: RASTRUCTURe 677 7 HONOLULU, NAMES 96dMS 0W06Cl4 PARC. 7 EIEV S. PI ANTENNA 77 EX UDE: EN DISTANCE. nTR, ESHOWE, AS REFERENCE ONLI) 131 * 161 PANEL MUM. l TV. J PER SKTOR( TOTMO 2) IO. HIGHaH MM ONOPOO LE PI DCPOWRI( PI MER EIRE CAMAS WITHN 7 R1EAIOUCI ROUSED WENN PI MONOPOLE LO.( Pi UTETYPOLE Il w M 1iF7. 36'• ff fA 1 I% ANTENNA ZP EXCLUSION DETANCE TYP. ( SHOWN AS REFERENCE ONLY) PI MET PANEL ANTENNA TYP. J PER SECTOR ROTA411) P)• ATA' I/ RF6 HIGH MONOPOLE EPS OO POWER= IPI flet TRINE CARES MINN 7 MERDUCI RODEO WENN P) MOIOPOLE TO. l% NIRY POLE ATM Ms ID: HIL03345 y„. 1,01 R). NSC CFE!.= EC Re ; AV. 1 i I 06/ 17119 RFDS REV 0 4, 1: 119 ICO% ZD: 1 0'. W:), TOR IDI NY ^ AtF :% SC. RWrt7N 11c. n• o. \ 1:..:.-.... m.. A'''' 4 • •, " AT& T MAY POE FOR -- 3 -- OVERNEAOPOwet RAW ELEV. 4 0 3*. GLI in war SAM 14 EOIYAIEA SHELTER J TO. ( P1 SHELTER 4 ELF/. 1144 )*. G1.) Alar 30( 0 FOR rl Are• r' AE: E FP= m C' F TIL I% L1Un OVERHEAD POWER 601ER OVERHEAD PEWEE' JAM IA FAUPMEM SHELTER T. D. P) SHELTER MyAaf9F HIL03345 LEVAN ESTATES IRMAPRHOP FALAPANA PO PAMPA. HI 96778 TMK: 13) 1. 3. 001007 REV. IDSIR OL) T. O. P) OXANWK FENCE ELEV. 10- 1IAGLJ AL 00. IP) CNMINI. 0 Slxel Vie. ELEVATIONS IN 6 HANL . 11 GREEN R- FENCFw GRAN DEAL CDSLN'; PRNACY LATS ELF'. 6' d1AG. L.) I RENED CAE ADE E_ C GCE ElfV. bdIAG1J I% 6 FE HIGH PRIVACY LHC FENCE wlEEER CYsu,. SL RtISHEO GRADE Stme1 N: mtsm. \ A- 4 L lIFV. Od T PI ATV..' 114. 00 CFIAN• LNK FENCE DOOR JWNG GATES W/ GREEN LATS ELEV. 0d 1 EAST ELEVATION - ' 2 WEST ELEVATION vrrI 1 rr r Q i ,' P P' d r 5' ti 4Q PZ14, 5. 411.1 5. 1i • 5' 1 ti CnJ MALAMA ST 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1'7l> r 1 1 I I I I U 0 EBI GIS, Source: U.S. Census Bureau Legend ' See associated map legend for additional source information. Project Site Site Radiusat 250', 500', 1000', 1/2, % & 1 mile Date: 3/2/2020 Land Resources Map 03345 FA 10553982 LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HAWAII 96778 Pr' 6120001112 EBI Consulting environmental I engineering I design Land Resources Legend Scenic Parkways, Rivers & Trails National Scenic Parkway National Park Service Trail / Appalachian Trail AZ - BLM Historic Trail CT - DEP Trail MT- Lewis & Clark Trail NY - Trails j NY - Scenic Landmark Area NY - Statewide Area of Scenic Significance National Wild, Scenic River CA, MT, PA - Wild or Scenic River Sources: National Park Service http://www.nps.gov/gis/data_into/; Bureau of land management http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en.html ; CT DEP http.//www.ct.gov/deep/cwp/view.asp?a=2698&q=323342&deepNav GID=1707%20 ; NY GIS Clearinghouse http://gis.ny.gov/; National W & S Rivers http://www.rivers.gov/nvers/mapping-gis.php; Montana GIS http://nris.mt.gov/gis; California Atlas http://atlas.ca.gov/ State Conservation, Lands & Wildlife Areas t t CT - DEP Property CO - Public Access Wildlife Area FL - Wildlife Management Area MT - National Wildlife Refuge NH - WMNF Management Area ME - Conservation Land TN - Wildlife Resource Land TX - State Park or Wildlife Mgt Area TX -Audubon Sanctuary CT - DEP Municipal and Open Space NH - Conservation Land NY - DEC State Lands Sources: CT DEP http://www.ctgov/deep/cwprview.asp?a=2698&q=323342&deepNav GID=1707%20 CO Wildlife Space http://ndis.nrel.colostate.edu/ftp/ftp-response.asp Florida Fish and Wildlife www.MyFWC.com : Montana GIS http://nris.mt.gov/gis : NH GRANIT ttp://www.granit.unh.edu/data/downloadfreedata ; ME GIS http://megis.maine.gov/catalog ; TN GIS http://wwwstate.to.usrenvironment/parks/gisrdata/; TX GIS http://wwwglo.state.tx.us/nri/data/index.html ; NY GIS Clearinghouse http://gis.nygov/ NY - Agricultural District State Endangered Threatened & a AZ - Areas of Environmental Concern US FWS NWI 116 Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Wetland Type SG Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland in Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond K Lake all Other OS Riverine Protected Species MA- NHESP Priority Habitats of Rare Species FL - Conservation Species MA- NHESP Certified Vernal Pool ME - Candidate Vernal Pool NY - Important Bird Area CA - Spotted Owl Territory CA - NDDB T & E Species CT - NDDB Area Feature CT - DEP Critical Habitat MA - NHESP Estimated Habitats of Rare Wildlife TX - Protected Species 11111111111111111 TX - Ecologically Unique Rivers Streams Sources: AZ BLM Page htlpJ/www.blm.gov/az/st/en/prog/maps/gis flies.html. CNDDB http://wwwdfg.ca.gov/biogeodata/cnddb/ ; CT DEP http://wwwct.gov/deep/cwp/viewasp? a=2698&q=323342&deepNav-G!D=1707%20 ; MAGIS http://www.mass.gov/mgis/laylisthtm ; TX GIS httpY/wwwglo.state.tx.us/nrifdatarindex.html: Florida Fish and Wildlife wwwMyFWC.com: NY GIS Clearinghouse http://gis.nygov/ Federal & National Coverage Data Layers USFWS Critical Habitat FEMA Q3 Flood Zone 2006 USFWS Critical Habitat Area National Park Service I National Wildlife Area or Refuge Federally Owned Land National Wilderness Areas et National Park Service Site 500 -year inundation area. 100 -year inundation area. 100 -year inundation area with velocity hazard. Undetermined but possible flood hazard area. Floodway area, including watercourse extent. No Flood Data No Flood Data Available Sources: National Park Service http://www.nps.gov/gis/data info/ ; USFWS http://crithab.Iws.gov/; National Park Service http://science.nature.nps.gov nrdata/index. cfm The National Map http.//nationalmap.gov/; Wilderness. net http://www.wildemess.net/ ; FEMA - 03 Flood Data httpsi/msc.fema.gov agEBI Consulting environmental I engineering I due diligence PHOTOGRAPHS I. View toward the location of the proposed cell tower, facing west 2. View toward the locat C on of the proposed cell tower, facing south J 3. View toward the location of the proposed cell tower, facing north 4. Overview of access road adjacent to location of proposed cell tower, north view SPECIES REVIEW DOCUMENTATION Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 1 of 26 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service ECOS ECOS / Species Reports / Species occurrence by state Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Notes: As of 02/13/2015 the data in this report has been updated to use a different set of information. Results are based on where the species is believed to or known to occur. The FWS feels utilizing this data set is a better representation of species occurrence. Note: there may be other federally listed species that are not currently known or expected to occur in this state but are covered by the ESA wherever they are found; Thus if new surveys detected them in this state they are still covered by the ESA. The FWS is using the best information available on this date to generate this list. This report shows listed species or populations believed to or known to occur in Hawaii This list does not include experimental populations and similarity of appearance listings. This list includes species or populations under the sole jurisdiction of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Click on the highlighted scientific names below to view a Species Profile for each listing. Listed species -- 503 listings Animals -- 79 listings Status Species/Listing Name E Akekee Wherever found (Longs caeruleirostris) E akepa, Hawaii Wherever found (Loxons coccineus) E akepa, Maui Wherever found (Loxops ochraceus) httpsa/ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=HI&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 2 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E akialoa, Kauai (honeycreeper) Wherever found (Akialoa steinegen) E akiapolaau Wherever found (Hemignathus wilsoni) E Akikiki Wherever found (Oreomystis bairdt) E Albatross, short -tailed Wherever found (Phoebastria (=Diomedea) albatrus) E Amphipod, Kauai cave Wherever found (Spelaeorchestia koloana) E Bat, Hawaiian hoary Wherever found (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) E Coot, Hawaiian Wherever found (Fulica americana alai) E Creeper, Hawaii Wherever found (Oreomystis mana) E Creeper, Molokai Wherever found (Paroreomyza flammea) E Creeper, Oahu Wherever found (Paroreomyza maculate) E Crow, Hawaiian (='alala) Wherever found (Corvus hawaiiensis) E Damselfly, blackline Hawaiian Wherever found (Megalaqrion niarohamatum niarolineatum) E Damselfly, crimson Hawaiian Wherever found (Megalaqrion leptodemas) E Damselfly, flying earwig Hawaiian Wherever found (Megalaqrion nesiotes) E Damselfly, oceanic Hawaiian Wherever found (Megalaqrion oceanicum) E Damselfly, orangeblack Hawaiian Wherever found (Megalaqrion xanthomelas) E Damselfly, Pacific Hawaiian Wherever found (Megalaqrion pacificum) E Duck, Hawaiian (=koloa) Wherever found (Anas wwilliana) E Duck, Laysan Wherever found (Anas /aysanensis) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=H1&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 3 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E elepaio, Oahu Wherever found (Chasiempis ibidis) E Finch, Laysan (honeycreeper) Wherever found (Te/espvza cantans) E Finch, Nihoa (honeycreeper) Wherever found (Telespvza Wilma) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila aqlaia) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila differens) E Fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila diqressa) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila hemipeza) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila heteroneura) T fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila mullr) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila musaphilia) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila obatal) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila ochrobasis) E Fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila sharpi) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila substenoptera) E fly, Hawaiian picture -wing Wherever found (Drosophila tarphvtrichia) E gallinule, Hawaiian common Wherever found (Gallinula qaleata sandvicensis) E Goose, Hawaiian Wherever found (Brenta (=Nesochen) sandvicensis) E Hawk, Hawaiian (='1o) Wherever found (Buteo solitarius) E honeycreeper, (Akohekohe) crested Wherever found (Palmeria doles) T 'I'iwi Wherever found (Drepanis coccinea) https://ecosfws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=HI&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 4 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Millerbird, Nihoa (old world warbler) Wherever found (Acrocephalus familiaris kings) E Moth, Blackburn's sphinx Wherever found (Manduca blackbumi) E nukupuu, Kauai Wherever found (Hemignathushanapepe) E nukupuu, Maui Wherever found (Hemipnathus affinis) E Cr o, Kauai (honeyeater) Wherever found (Moho braccatus) E 'O'u (honeycreeper) Wherever found (Psittirostra psittacea) E Palila (honeycreeper) Wherever found (Loxioides bailleur) E parrotbill, Maui (Kiwikiu) Wherever found (Pseudonestorxanthophrys) E petrel, Hawaiian Wherever found (Pterodroma sandwichensis) E picture -wing fly, Hawaiian Wherever found (Drosophila montoomeryi) E picture -wing fly, Hawaiian Wherever found (Drosophila neoclavisetae) E Po'ouli (honeycreeper) Wherever found (Melamprosops phaeosoma) T Sea turtle, green Central North Pacific DPS (Chelonia mydas) E Sea turtle, hawksbill Wherever found (Eretmochelys imbricata) E Sea turtle, leatherback Wherever found (Dermochelys coriacea) T Sea turtle, olive ridley Wherever found, except when listed as endangered under 50 CFR 224.101 (Lepidochelvs olivacea) T Shearwater, Newell's Townsend's Wherever found (Puffinus auricularis newellr) E Shrimp, anchialine pool Wherever found (Procaris hawaiana) E Shrimp, anchialine pool Wherever found (Vetericaris chaceorum) E Snail, Lanai tree Wherever found (Partulina semicarinata) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=HI&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 5 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Snail, Lanai tree Wherever found (Partulina variabilis) T Snail, Newcomb's Wherever found (Erinna newcombi) E Snails, Oahu tree Wherever found (Achatinella sip.) E Spider, Kauai cave wolf or pe'e pe'e maka 'ole Wherever found Adelocosa anops) E Stilt, Hawaiian Wherever found (Himantoous mexicanus knudseni) E Storm -petrel, band-rumped USA (HI) (Oceanodroma castro) E Thrush, large Kauai (=kamao) Wherever found (Mvadestes mvadestinus) E Thrush, Molokai Wherever found (Mvadestes lanaiensis rutha) E Thrush, small Kauai (=puaiohi) Wherever found (Mvadestes batmen) E Tree snail, Newcomb's Wherever found (Newcombia cumincv) E Yellow -faced bee, anthricinan Wherever found (Hvlaeus anthracinus) E Yellow -faced bee, assimulans Wherever found (Hvlaeus assimulans) E Yellow -faced bee, easy Wherever found (Hvlaeus facilis) E yellow -faced bee, Hawaiian Wherever found (Hvlaeus kuakea) E yellow -faced bee, Hawaiian Wherever found (Hvlaeus longiceps) E yellow -faced bee, Hawaiian Wherever found (Hvlaeus mans) E Yellow -faced bee, hilaris Wherever found (Hvlaeus hilaris) Plants -- 424 listings Status Species/Listing Name E Ke (Zanthoxylum dipetalum var. tomentosum) E Ke (Zanthoxvlum hawaiiense) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hf&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 6 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E A'e (Zanthoxvlum oahuense) T 'Ahinahina (Argvroxiphium sandwicense SSD. macrocephalum) E 'Ahinahina (Argvroxiphium sandwicense ssp. sandwicense) E 'Aiakeakua, popolo (Solanum sandwicense) E 'Aiea (Nothocestrum brevitlorum) E 'Aiea (Nothocestrum latifolium) E 'Aiea (Nothocestrum peltatum) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia celastroides var. kaenana) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia deppeana) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia eleanoriae) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia haeleeleana) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia herbstii) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia kuwaleana) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia remvi var. kauaiensis) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia remvi var. remvi) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia rockii) E 'Akoko (Euphorbia halemanui) E 'Akoko, Ewa Plains (Euphorbia skottsberqii var. skottsberqii) E 'aku (Cvanea tritomantha) E 'aku'aku (Cvanea p/atvphvlla) E 'Ala 'ala wai nui (Peperomia subpetiolata) J https://ecos.fwsgov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 7 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Alani (Melicope adscendens) E Alani (Melicope bailout) E Alani (Melicope christophersenii) E Alani (Melicope degenen) E Alani (Melicope haupuensis) E Alani (Melicope hilakae) E Alani (Melicope knudseniq E Alani (Melicope Ivdgatei) E Alani (Melicove makahae) E Alani (Melicope mucronulata) E Alani (Melicope munro/ E Alani (Melicope (Nalis) E Alani (Melicope aallida) E Alani (Melicope naniculata) E Alani (Melicope puberula) E Alani (Melicope ouadranoularis) E Alani (Melicope reflexa) E Alani (Melicope saint-iohnii) E Alani (Melicope zahlbrucknen) E 'Anaunau (Lepidium arbuscula) E•Anunu (Sicvos albus) baps://ecus.fws.gov/ecpo/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 8 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E 'Anunu (Sicvos macrophvllus) E aumakua, Palapalai (Drvopteris crinalis var. podosorus) E Aupaka (Isodendrion hosakae) E Aupaka (Isodendrion laurifolium) T Aupaka (Isodendrion /ongifolium) E 'Awikiwiki (Canavalia molokaiensis) E 'Awikiwiki (Canavalia napaliensis) E Awikiwiki (Canavalia pubescens) E Awiwi (Schenkia sebaeoides) E 'Awiwi (Kadua cookiana) E ballart, Menzies (Exocarpos menziesil) E bean, sea (Mucuna sloanei persericea) E Bluegrass, Hawaiian (Poa sandvicensis) E Bluegrass, Mann's (Poa mannii) E Chaff -flower, round -leaved (Achyranthes solendens var. rotundata) E diellia, Asplenium-leaved (Asplenium dielerectum) E 'Ena'ena (Pseudoonaphalium (=Gnaphalium) sandwicensium var. molokaiense) E fern, Maui (Microlepia strigosa var. mauiensis) E Fern, pendant kihi (Adenophorus periens) E Gardenia (=Na'u), Hawaiian (Gardenia brighamii) E Geranium, Hawaiian red -flowered (Geranium arboreum) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 9 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Haha (Cvanea acuminata) E Haha (Cvanea asarifolia) E Haha (Cyanea asplenifelia) E Haha (Cvanea calycina) E Haha (Cvanea copelandii ssp. copelandii) E Haha (Cvanea copelandii ssp. haleakalaensis) E haha (Cvanea crispa) E Haha (Cvanea dolich000da) E paha (Cyanea dunbariae) E Naha (Cvanea duvalliorum) E Haha (Cvanea eleeleensis) E haha (Cvanea gibsonit) E Haha (Cvanea olabra) E Haha (Cvanea grimesiana ssp. grimesiana) E Haha (Cvanea grimesiana ssp. obatae) E Haha (Cyanea hamatiflora ssp. carlsonii) E Haha (Cvanea hamatiflora ssp. hamatiflora) E Haha (Cvanea humboldtiana) E Haha (Cyanea kolekoleensis) E Haha (Cvanea koolauensis) E Haha (Cvanea kuhihewa) https://eros.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/speoies d-by-state-report?state=117&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 10 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Haha (Cvanea kunthiana) E Haha (Cvanea Ianceolata) E Haha (Cvanea lobata) E Haha (Cyanea lon(7i10ra) E haha (Cyanea maanicalyx) E Haha (Cvanea mannit) E haha (Cvanea maritae) E Haha (Cvanea marksit) E haha (Cvanea mauiensis) E Haha (Cvanea mceldowneyi) E haha (Cyanea munroi) E Haha (Cvanea obtusa) E Haha (Cvanea pinnatifida) E Haha (Cvanea procera) T Haha (Cvanea recta) E Haha (Cvanea remyi) E Haha (Cvanea rivularis) E Haha (Cvanea shipmanii) E Haha (Cvanea stictophvlla) E Haha (Cvanea st.-iohnii) E Haha (Cvanea superba) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=H1&status=listed 1/2/2018 0 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 11 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Haha (Cvanea truncata) E Haha (Cyanea undulata) E haiwale (Cvrtandra ferripilosa) E Haiwale (Cyrtandra paliku) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra crenata) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra dentata) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra filipes) E Ha'iwale (Cvrtandra oiffardii) E Ha'iwale (Cvrtandra hematos) E Ha'iwale (Cvrtandra kaulantha) T Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra limahuliensis) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra munrot) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra oenobarba) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra oxybapha) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra polvantha) E Ha'iwale (Cvrtandra sessilis) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra subumbellata) E Ha'iwale (Cvrtandra tintinnabula) E Ha'iwale (Cyrtandra viriditlora) E Hala pepe (Pleomele fernaldii) E Hala pepe (Pleomele forbesil) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 12 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Hala pepe (Pleomele hawaiiensis) E Hau kuahiwi (Hibiscadelphus qiffardianus) E Hau kuahiwi (Hibiscadelphus hualalaiensis) E Hau kuahiwi (Hibiscadelphus woodii) E Heau (Exocarpos /uteolus) E Hibiscus, Clays (Hibiscus clavi) E Ho'awa (Pittosporum napaliense) E Holei (Ochrosia haleakalae) E Holei (Ochrosia kilaueaensis) E Honohono (Haplostachvs haplostachva) E Hulumoa (Korthalsella deqeneri) E Ihi (Portulaca villosa) E Ihi'ihi (Marsilea villosa) E Iliau, dwarf (Wilkesia hobdyi) E Ischaemum, Hilo (Ischaemum byrone) E Kamakahala (Labordia cvrtandrae) E Kamakahala (Labordia helleri) E Kamakahala (Labordia Ivdgatei) E Kamakahala (Labordia pumila) E Kamakahala (Labordia tinifolia var. lanaiensis) E Kamakahala (Labordia tinifolia var. wahiawaensis) https:/,/ecos fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=HI&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 13 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Kamakahala (Labordia triflora) E Kamanomano (Cenchrus agrimonioides) E Kampua'a (Kadua (=Hedyotis) fluviatilis) E Kauai hau kuahiwi (Hibiscadelphus distans) E Kauila (Colubrina oppositifolia) E Kaulu (Pteralvxia kauaiensis) E Kaulu (Pteralvxia macrocarpa) E kilau (Drvopteris glabra var. pusilla) E Kio'ele (Kadua coriacea) E Kiponapona (Phyllostegia racemosa) E Kohe malama malama o kanaloa (Kanaloa kahoolawensis) E Koholapehu (Dubautia latifolia) E Koki'o (Kokia drvnarioides) E Koki'o (Kokia kauaiensis) E Koki'o, Cooke's (Kokia cooker) E Koki'o ke oke'o (Hibiscus arnottianus ssp. immaculatus) E Koki'o ke'oke'o (Hibiscus waimeae ssp hannerae) E Kolea (Myrsine fosbergii) E Kolea (Myrsine iuddil) E Kolea (Mvrsine knudsenii) T Kolea (Mvrsine Iinearifolia) haps://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 14 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Kolea (Mvrsine mezil) E Kolea (Mvrsine vaccinioides) E Ko'oko'olau (Bidens amplectens) E Ko'oko'olau (Bidens campylotheca pentamera) E Ko'oko'olau (Bidens campvlotheca waihoiensis) E Ko'oko'olau (Bidens coniuncta) E Ko'oko'olau (Bidens micrantha ctenophvlla) E Ko'oko'olau (Bidens micrantha ssp. kalealaha) E Ko'oko'olau (Bidens wiebkei) E Ko'oloa'ula (Abutilon menziesii) E kopa (Kadua cordata remyl) E Kopiko (Psvchotria grandiflora) E Kopiko (Psvchotria hobdvi) E Kuahiwi laukahi (Plantago hawaiensis) E Kuahiwi laukahi (Plantago princeps) E Kuawawaenohu (Schiedea Ivchnoides) E Kula wahine noho (Isodendrion pyrifolium) E Kulu'i (Nototrichium humile) E Lau 'ehu (Panicum niihauense) E Laulihilihi (Schiedea stellarioides) E lehua makanoe (Lvsimachia daphnoides) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/report/species-listed-by-state-report?state=H1&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 15 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Liliwai (Acaena exiqua) E Lo'ulu (Pritchardia kaalae) E Lo'ulu (Pritchardia lanigera) E Lo'ulu (Pritchardia maideniana) E Lo'ulu (Pritchardia munrot) E Lo'ulu (Pritchardia napaliensis) E Lo'ulu (Pritchardia remota) E Lo'ulu (Pritchardia schattaueri) E Lo'ulu (Pritchardia viscosa) E Lo'ulu, (=Na'ena'e) (Pritchardia hardy[) E Love grass, Fosberg's (Eraqrostis fosberqii) E Mahoe (Alectrvon macrococcus) E maiden fern, Boyds (Cvclosorus bovdiae) T Makou (Peucedanum sandwicense) E Makou (Ranunculus hawaiensis) E Makou (Ranunculus mauiensis) E Ma'o hau hele, (=native yellow hibiscus) (Hibiscus brackenridqei) E Ma'oli'oli (Schiedea apokremnos) E Ma'oli'oli (Schiedea hawaiiensis) E Ma'oli'oli (Schiedea kealiae) E Ma'oli'oli (Schiedea pubescens) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 16 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Mapele (Cvrtandra cvaneoides) E Mehamehame (Flueggea neowawraea) E Naenae (Dubautia kalalauensis) E Naenae (Dubautia kenwoodii) E Na'ena'e (Dubautia herbstobatae) E Na'ena'e (Dubautia imbricata imbricata) E Na'ena'e (Dubautia oaucifloru/a) E Na'ena'e (Dubautia plantaginea magnifolia) E Na'ena'e (Dubautia plantaginea SSD. humilis) E Na'ena'e (Dubautia waialealae) E Nani wai'ale'ale (Viola kauaiensis var. wahiawaensis) E Nanu (Gardenia mann[) E Nanu (Gardenia remvi) E Naupaka, dwarf (Scaevola coriacea) E Nehe (Lipochaeta fauriel) E Nehe (Lipochaeta /obata var. leptophvlla) E Nehe (Lipochaeta micrantha) E Nehe (Lipochaeta waimeaensis) E nehe (Melanthera kamolensis) E Nehe (Melanthera tenuifolia) E Nioi (Eugenia koolauensis) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species bel ed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 1of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E No common name (Abutilon eremitopetalum) E No common name (Abutilon sandwicense) E No common name (Achvranthes mutica) E No common name (Amaranthus brownii E No common name (Asplenium dielfalcatum) E No common name (Asplenium diellaciniatum) E No common name (Asplenium dielmannii) E No common name (Asplenium dielpaiidum) E No common name (Asplenium peruvianum var. insutare) E No common name (Asplenium unisorum) E No common name (Sedans hillebrandiana ssp. hitlebrandiana) E No common name (Bonamia menziesii) E No common name (Cvanea kauaulaensis) E No common name (Cvanea profuga) E No common name (Cvanea purourellifolia) E No common name (Cvperus Muriel) E No common name (Cvperus neokunthianus) E No common name (Cvperus pennatiformis) E No common name (Cvrtandra areas) E No common name (Cvrtandra nanawa/eensis) E No common name (Cvrtandra waver!) Impsa/ecos.fws.gov/ecp0ireportslspecies-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 18 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E No common name (Cvrtandra waiolani) E No common name (Delissea rhvtidosperma) E No common name (Delissea undulata) E No common name (Deparia kaalaana) E No common name (Diplazium molokaiense) E No common name (Doryopteris anqelica) E No common name (Doryopteris takeuchil) E No common name (Festuca hawaiiensis) E No common name (Festuca molokaiensis) E No common name (Gouania hillebrandit) E No common name (Gouania meyenit) E No common name (Gouania vitifolia) E No common name (Hesperomannia arborescens) E No common name (Hesperomannia arbuscula) E No common name (Hesperomannia Ivdgatet) E No common name (Kadua degeneri) E No common name (Kadua haupuensis) E No common name (Kadua parvula) E No common name (Kadua st.-johnin E No common name (Kevsseria (=Lagenifera) erici) E No common name (Kevsseria (=Lagenifera) helenae) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=HI&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 19 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E No common name (Labordia lorenciana) E No common name (Lepidium orbiculare) E No common name (Lipochaeta venosa) E No common name (Lobelia koolauensis) E No common name (Lobelia monostachya) E No common name (Lobelia niihauensis) E No common name (Lobelia oahuensis) E No common name (Lvsimachia filifolia) E No common name (Lvsimachia !niki) E No common name (Lvsimachia Iydgatei) E No common name (Lvsimachia maxima) E No common name (Lvsimachia pendens) E No common name (Lvsimachia scopuiensis) E No common name (Lvsimachia venosa) E No common name (Neraudia angulata) E No common name (Neraudia ovata) E No common name (Neraudia seripea) E No common name (Phyllostegia bracteata) E No common name (Phyllostegia brevidens) E No common name (Phyllostegia floribunda) E No common name (Phyllostegia glabra var. Ianaiensis) haps://ecosfws.gov/ecp0/repons/species-listed-by-state-report?state=H1&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 20 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E No common name (Phvllostegia haliakalae) E No common name (Phvllostegia batten) E No common name (Phvllostegia hirsuta) E No common name (Phyllosteoia hispida) E No common name (Phvllostegia kaalaensis) E No common name (Phvllostegia knudsenir) E No common name (Phvllostegia mannii) E No common name (Phvllostegia mollis) E No common name (Phvllostegia parviflora) E No common name (Phvllostegia pilosa) E No common name (Phyllostegia renovans) E No common name (Phyllostegia stachvoides) E No common name (Phvllostegia velutina) E No common name (Phvllostegia waimeae) E No common name (Phvllostegia warshaueri) E No common name (Phyllostegia wawrana) E No common name (Pittosporum halophilum) E No common name (Pittosporum hawaiiense) E No common name (Platanthera holochila) E No common name (Platvdesma cornuta cornuta) E No common name (Platvdesma cornuta decurrens) https://ecosfws.gov/ecp0/reports/speoies-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or ki m to occur in Hawaii Page 21 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E No common name (Platydesma remvi) E No common name (Poa sin/wool/ma) E No common name (Polvscias bisattenuata) E No common name (Polyscias tlynnii) E No common name (Polvscias Ivdgatei) E No common name (Polyscias racemosa) E No common name (Pritchardia bakeri) E No common name (Pteris lidgatei) E No common name (Remva kauaiensis) E No common name (Remva montgomery° E No common name (Sanicua mariversa) E No common name (Sanicua pumurea) E No common name (Sanicula sandwicensis) E No common name (Santalum involutum) E No common name (Schiedea attenuata) E No common name (Schiedea diffusa ssp. macraei) E No common name (Schiedea diffusa subsp. diffusa) E No common name (Schiedea haleakalensis) E No common name (Schiedea helleri) E No common name (Schiedea hooker° E No common name (Schiedea iacobii) Intps://ecos.cws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Ht&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 22 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E No common name (Schiedea kaalae) E No common name (Schiedea kauaiensis) E No common name (Schiedea laui) E No common name (Schiedea Ivdgatei) E No common name (Schiedea membranacea) E No common name (Schiedea nuttallii) E No common name (Schiedea obovata) E No common name (Schiedea salicaria) E No common name (Schiedea sarmentosa) E No common name (Schiedea sperqulina var. !eiopoda) T No common name (Schiedea sperqulina var. sperqulina) E No common name (Schiedea irinervis) E No common name (Schiedea viscosa) E No common name (Sicvos laneeoloideus) E No common name (Silene alexandn) T No common name (Silene hawaiiensis) E No common name (Silene lanceolata) E No common name (Silene perlmanii) E No common name (Spermolepis hawaiiensis) E No common name (Stenogvne anqustifolia anqustifolia) E No common name (Stenoovne bifida) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-fisted-by-state report?state=Ht&status=listed 1/2/2016 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 23 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E No common name (Stenogyne campanulata) E No common name (Stenogvne cranwelliae) E No common name (Stenogyne kaalae ssp. sherifil) E No common name (Stenogvne kanehoana) E No common name (Stenogyne kauaulaensis) E No common name (Stenogyne kealiae) E No common name (Tetramolopium arenarium) E No common name (Tetramolopium filiforme) E No common name (Tetramolopium lepidotum ssp. lepidotum) E No common name (Tetramolopium remyt) T No common name (Tetramolopium rockily E No common name (Tremato/obelia sinqularis) E No common name (Visna o-wahuensis) E No common name (Viola helenae) E No common name (Viola Ianaiensis) E No common name (Viola oahuensis) E No common name (Wikstroemia skottsbergiana) E No common name (Wikstroemia villosa) E No common name (Xylosma crenatum) E Nohoanu (Geranium hanaense) E Nohoanu (Geranium hillebrandii) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 24 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Nohoanu (Geranium kauaiense) E Nohoanu (Geranium multitlorum) E nui, haha (Cvanea horrida) E Oha (Delissea subcordata) E Ohai (Sesbania tomentosa) E 'Oha wai (Clermontia drepanomorpha) E 'Oha wai (Clermontia lindsevana) E 'Oha wai (Clermontia oblonqifolia ssp. brevipes) E 'Oha wai (Clermontia oblonqifolia ssp. mauiensis) E 'Oha wai (Clermontia peleana) E 'Oha wai (Clermontia pvrularia) E 'Oha wai (Clermontia samuelil) E 'Ohe (Joinvillea ascendens ascendens) E 'Ohe'ohe (Polvscias gymnocarpa) E olua (Hvpolepis hawaiiensis var. mauiensis) E Olulu (Briqhamia insignis) E Opuhe (Urera kaalae) E Pa'iniu (Astelia waialealae) E Pamakani (Tetramolopium capillare) E Pamakani (Viola chamissoniana SSD. chamissoniana) E Panicgrass, Carter's (Panicum fauriei var. carteri) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-(fisted-by-state-report?state=Hl&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 25 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Papala (Charpentiera densiflora) E Pauoa (Ctenitis squamigera) E pilo (Kadua Iaxiflora) E Pilo kea lau 11 i (Platydesma rostrata) E Poe (Portulaca sclerocarpa) E Popolo (Cvanea solanacea) E Popolo (Solanum nelsonip E Popolo ku mai (Solanum incompletum) E Pua 'ala (Brighamia rockii) E Pu'uka'a (Cvperus trachysanthos) E Reedgrass, Hillegrand's (Calamagrostis hillebrandit) E Reedgrass, Maui (Calamagrostis expanse) E Remya, Maui (Remva mauiensis) E Sandalwood, Lanai (='iliahi) (Santalum haleakalae var. lanaiense) E Schiedea, Diamond Head (Schiedea adamantis) E Silversword, Mauna Loa (=Ka'u) (Argvroxiphium kauense) E Uhi uhi (Mezoneuron kavaiense) E Vetch, Hawaiian (Vicia menziesii) E Wahane (Pritchardia avlmer-robinsonit) E Wawae'iole (Huperzia mann[) E Wawae'iole (Huperzia nutans) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reportsIspecies-listed-by-state-report?state=HI&status=listed 1/2/2018 Listed species believed to or known to occur in Hawaii Page 26 of 26 Status Species/Listing Name E Wawae'iole (Huperzia (=Phleqmariurus) stemmermanniae) E wild coffee, Oahu (=kopiko) (Psvchotria hexandra ssp. oahuensis) https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=HI&status=listed 1/2/2018 6/ 19/ 2020 Critical Habitat for T Critical Habitat for Threatened & Endangered Species Final Linear Features Final Polygon Features Proposed Linear Features Proposed Polygon Features A specific geographic area( s) that contains features essential for and that may require special management and protection. U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service I Resource Mapping Hawaii https Mws maps. arcgis. com/ home/ webmap/ print. html the conservation Esri Community Endangered Species ( USFWS) SFWS 130 of a threatened or endangered species esri 2OOft Maps Contributors, BuildingFootprintUSA, Esri, HERE, Garmin, SafeGraph, METI/ NASA, USGS, EPA, US Census Bureau, USDA 1/ 1 United States Department of the Interior In Reply Refer to: OIERIFoo-2020-SL-0196 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 3[It1 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 Kim Narel, Biologist Telecom Environmental South California EBI Office 1501 Quail Street P1 10 Newport Beach, California 92660 March 13, 2020 Subject: Species List for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii Dear Ms. Kim Narel: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received your correspondence on March 2, 2020, requesting a species list for AT&T Mobility LLD Project located in Leilani Estates in Puna. The Service offers the following comments to assist you in your planning process so that impacts to trust resources can be avoided through site preparation, construction, and operation. Our comments are provided under the authorities of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.0 1531 et seq.). Project Description AT&T Mobility LLC is proposing a new 100 -foot monopole telecommunications compound at Leilani Estate at 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road. The project is in undeveloped rainforest Based on information you provided and pertinent information in our files, including data compiled by the Hawaii Biodiversity and Mapping Project, there are two listed animal species in the immediate vicinity of the project area: The federally endangered Hawaiian hoary bat Lasiurus cinereus semotus) and the threatened Hawaiian goose (Branta (Nesochen) sandvicensis). Additionally, the endangered Hawaiian petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis), band- nunped storm -petrel (Oceanodroma castro), and the threatened Newell's shearwater (Puffin()) auricularis novella) may transit the project area flying to upland breeding colonies. The federally listed plant species, Haiwale (C'yrrandra nanawaleensis), may also occur in the vicinity of the project area. The Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius), a species that was recently removed from the federal list of threatened and endangered species, continues to be State -listed as endangered under HRS INTERIOR REGION 9 COLUMBIA -PACIFIC NORTHWEST IDAHO, MONTANA*, OREGON'. WASHINGTON mann INTERIOR REGION 12 PACIFIC ISLANDS AMERICAN SAMOA, GUAM, HAWAII, NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS Ms. Kim Narel 2 195-D. We recommend the identified avoidance and minimization measures (see below) be incorporated into project implementation plans and recommend you coordinate with the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife. for any further compliance related to Hawaiian hawk. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to listed species, the following measures are recommended: Hawaiian hawk The State -listed Hawaiian hawk is known to occur across a broad range of forest habitats throughout the Island of Hawaii. Loud, irregular and unpredictable activities, such as using heavy equipment or building a structure, near an endangered Hawaiian hawk nest may cause nest failure. Harassment of Hawaiian hawk nesting sites can alter feeding and breeding patterns or result in nest or chick abandonment. Nest disturbance can also increase exposure of chicks and juveniles to inclement weather or predators. To avoid and minimize impacts to Hawaiian hawks we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: If work must be conducted during the March I through September 30 Hawaiian hawk breeding season, have a biologist familiar with the species conduct a nest search of the project footprint and surrounding areas immediately prior to the start of construction activities. o Pre -disturbance surveys for Hawaiian hawks are only valid for 14 days. 1f disturbance for the specific location does not occur within 14 days of the survey, conduct another survey. No clearing of vegetation or construction activities should occur within 1,600 feet of any active Hawaiian hawk nest during the breeding season until the young have fledged. Regardless of the time of year, trees containing a hawk nest should not be cut, as nests may be re -used during consecutive breeding seasons. Hawaiian hoary bat The federally endangered Hawaiian hoary bat roosts in both exotic and native woody vegetation across all islands and will leave young unattended in trees and shrubs when they forage. If trees or shrubs 15 feet or taller are cleared during the pupping season, there is a dsk that young bats could inadvertently be hammed or killed since they are too young to fly or may not move away. Additionally, Hawaiian hoary bats forage for insects from as low as 3 feet to higher than 500 feet above the ground and can become entangled in barbed wire used for fencing. To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: Do not disturb, remove, or trim woody plants greater than 15 feet tall during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). Do not use barbed wire for fencing. Ms, Kim Narel Hawaiian goose The federally threatened Hawaiian goose is found on the islands of Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, and Kauai_ They are observed in a variety of habitats, but prefer open areas, such as pastures, golf courses, wetlands, natural grasslands and shrublands, and lava flows. Threats to the species include introduced mammalian and avian predators, wind facilities, and vehicle strikes. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian geese we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: 3 Do not approach, feed, or disturb Hawaiian geese. If Hawaiian geese are observed loafing or foraging within the project area during the breeding season (September through April), have a biologist familiar with the nesting behavior of nene survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. Repeat surveys after any subsequent delay of work of3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest), o Cease all work immediately and contact the Service for further guidance if a nest is discovered within a radius of 150 feet of proposed work, or a previously undiscovered nest is found within said radius after work begins. In areas where Hawaiian geese are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shearwater, and band-rumped storm petrel Hawaiian seabirds may traverse the project area at night during the breeding, nesting and fledging seasons (March I to December 15). Outdoor lighting could result in seabird disorientation, fallout, and injury or mortality. Seabirds are attracted to lights and after circling the lights they may become exhausted and collide with nearby wires, buildings, or other structures or they may land on the ground. Downed seabirds are subject to increased mortality due to collision with automobiles, starvation, and predation by dogs, cats, and other predators. Young birds (fledglings) traversing the project area between September 15 and December 15, in their first flights from their mountain nests to the sea, are particularly vulnerable. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to seabirds, the project: Fully shield all outdoor lights so the bulb can only be seen from below bulb height and only use when necessary. Install automatic motion sensor switches and controls on all outdoor lights or tum off lights when human activity is not occurring in the lighted area. Avoid nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 1.5 through December 15. Listed seabirds have been documented colliding with communication towers, particularly in areas of high seabird passage rate. In general, self-supporting monopoles are the least likely to result in collisions, whereas Lattice towers, particularly those that rely on guy -wires, have a higher risk. Ms. Kim Narel 4 To avoid and minimize the likelihood that towers will result in take of listed seabirds we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: The profile of the tower should be as small as possible, minimize the extent of the tower that protrudes above the surrounding vegetation layer, and avoid the use of guywires. If the top of the tower must be lit to comply with Federal Aviation Administration regulations, use a flashing red light verses a steady -beam red or white light. If possible, co -locate with existing towers or facilities. Seabirds have been known to collide with fences, powerlines and other structures near colonies. To avoid and minimize the likelihood of collision we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: Where fences extend above vegetation, integrate three strands of polytape into the fence to increase visibility. For powerlines, guywires and other cables, minimize exposure above vegetation height and vertical profile. We recommend further coordination with our office to address specific project details and potential seabird interactions. Cyrrandra nanawaleensis Project activities may affect listed plant species by causing physical damage to plant parts (roots, stems, flowers, fruits, seeds, etc.) as well as impacts to other life requisite features of their habitat which may result in reduction of germination, growth and/or reproduction. Cutting and removal of vegetation surrounding listed plants has the potential to alter microsite conditions (e.g., light, moisture, temperature), damaging or destroying the listed plants and also increasing the risk of invasion by nonnative plants which can result in higher incidence or intensity of fire. Activities such as grazing, use of construction equipment and vehicles, and increased human traffic (i.e. trails, visitation, monitoring), can cause ground disturbance, erosion, and/or soil compaction which decrease absorption of water and nutrients and damage plant root systems and may result in reduced growth and/or mortality of listed plants. Soil disturbance or removal has the potential to negatively impact the soil seed bank of listed plant species if such species are present or historically occurred in the project area. To avoid impacts to listed plant species: Minimize potential adverse effects to listed plants that may occur on the proposed project site by minimizing disturbance outside of existing developed or otherwise modified areas. When disturbance outside existing developed or modified sites is proposed, conduct a botanical survey for listed plant species within the project action area, defined as the area where direct and indirect effects are likely to occur. Surveys should be conducted by a knowledgeable botanist with documented experience in identifying native Hawaiian and Pacific Islands plants, including listed plant species. Botanical surveys should optimally be conducted during the wettest part of the year (typically October to April) when plants and identifying features are more likely to be Ms. Kim Narel 5 visible, especially in drier areas. If surveys are conducted outside of the wet season, the Service may assume plant presence. The boundary of the area occupied by listed plants should be marked with flagging by the surveyor. To avoid or minimize potential adverse effects to listed plants, we recommend adherence to buffer distances for the activities in the Table below. Where disturbed areas do not need to be maintained as an open area, restore disturbed areas using native plants as appropriate for the location. Whenever possible we recommend using native plants for landscaping purposes. The following websites are good resources to use when choosing landscaping plants: Landscape Industry Council of Hawaii Native Plant Poster http//hawaiiscape.wpeneine.com/pubbcations/) Native Hawaiian Plants for Landscaping, Conservation, and Reforestation ht s://www.etahr.bawaii edufoc;free.ubs/.df7of-30..d Best Native Plants for Landscapes htt.://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oe/free obs/pdf/OF-40.pdf) If listed plants occur in a project area, the avoidance buffers are recommended to reduce direct and indirect impacts to listed plants from project activities. However, where project activities will occur within the recommended buffer distances, additional consultation is required. The impacts to the plants of concern within the buffer area may be reduced by placing temporary fencing or other barriers at the boundary, of the disturbance, as far from the affected plants as practicable. The above guidelines apply to areas outside of designated critical habitat. Ifproject activities occur within designated critical habitat unit boundaries, additional consultation is required. Alt activities, including site surveys, risk introducing nonnative species into project areas. Specific attention needs to be made to ensure that all equipment, personnel and supplies are properly checked and are free of contamination (weed seeds, organic matter, or other contaminants) before entering project areas. Quarantines and or management activities occurring on specific priority invasive species proximal to project areas need to be considered or adequately addressed. This information can he acquired by contacting local experts such as those on local invasive species committees (Kauai: hups://www.kaualisc.orat Oahu: https://www.oahuisc.orgh Maui Nui: https://mauiinvasive.ora/ and Hawaii: hops://www.biisc.orgr Table I. Recommended buffer distances to minimize and avoid potential adverse impacts to listed plants from activities listed below. Action Buffer Distance (feet (meters)) - Keep Project Activity This Far Away from Listed Plant Grasses/Herbs/Shrubs and Terrestrial Trees and Orchids Arboreal Orchids king, hiking, surveys 3ft(Im) 3f(Im) Ms Kini Narel 6 Cutting and Removing Vegetation By Hand or Hand Tools (e.g., weeding) 3 ft (1 m) 3 ft (1 m) Mechanical Removal of Individual Plants or Woody Vegetation (e.g., chainsaw, weed eater) 3 ft up to height of removed vegetation whichever greater) 3 ft up to height of removed vegetation whichever greater) Removal of Vegetation with Heavy Equipment (e.g., bulldozer, tractor, "bush hog") 2x width equipment+ height of vegetation 820 ft (250 m) Use of Approved Herbicides following label) Ground-based Spray Application; hand application (no wand applicator; spot treatment) 10 ft (3 m) Crown diameter Ground-based Spray Application; manual pump with wand, backpack 50 ft (15 m) Crown diameter Ground-based Spray Application; vehicle- mounted tank sprayer 50 ft (15 m) Crown diameter Aerial Spray (ball applicator) 250 ft (76 m) 250 ft (76 m) Aerial Application — herbicide ballistic technology (individual plant treatment) 100 ft (30 m) Crown diameter Aerial Spray (boom) Further consultation required Further consultation required Use of Inset irides (pollinators, seed dispersers) Ground/Soil Disturbance/Outplanting/Fencing (Hand tools, e.g. shovel, 'o'b; Small mechanized tools, e.g., auger) 20 ft (6 m) 2x crown diameter Ground/Soil Disturbance (Heavy Equipment) 328 ft (100 m) 820 ft (250 m) Surface Hardening/Soil compaction Trails (e.g., human, angulates) 20 ft (6 m) 2x crown diameter Roads/Utility Corridors, Buildings/Structures 328 ft (100 m) 820 ft (250 m) Definitions (Wagner el al. 1999) Crown: The leafy top of a tree. Herb: A plant, either annual, biennial, or perennial, with the non -woody stems dying back to the ground at the end of the growing season. Ms. Kim Narel 7 Shrub: A perennial woody plant with usually several to numerous pr relatively near the ground. Tree: A woody perennial that usually has a single trunk Biosecurity and Invasive Species ary stems ansm om or We are attaching our list of Biosecurity Protocols to prevent the introduction and spread of harmful invasive species on the island of Hawaii. We encourage you to incorporate the relevant measures into your project description and all contracts for the constnrctionlmaittenance of the project. If this potential project should receive federal funding, federal permits, or any federal authorization, it will require a Section 7 consultation with the Service. The Service only conducts Section 7 consultations with the federal action agency or their designated representative. Thank you for participating with us in the protection of our endangered species. If you have any further questions or concerns regarding this consultation, please contact Eldridge Naboa, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 808-933-6964, e-mail: eldridge_naboa@tws.gov. When referring to this project, please include this reference numbers: OIEPIFOO-2020-SL-0746. Sincerely, Michelle Bogardus Island Team Manager Maui Nut and Hawaii Island Attachments: Biosecurity Protocols — Hawaii Island Ms. Kim Narel BIOSECURTY PROTOCOL —HAWAII ISLAND (JULY 2018) The following biosecurity protocol (based on National Park Service, State of Hawaii, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Geological Survey, and the DOI Office of Native Hawaiian Relations guidance) should he followed when operating on Hawaii Island to prevent the introduction of hamtful invasive species including frogs, ants, weeds, and fungi into local natural areas (e.g., Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge, State of Hawaii Natural Areas") and areas with native habitaL(habitat that is primarily composed of native vegetation), other islands in Hawaiian archipelago, or the U.S. mainland. The protocol also includes suggestions for keeping field staff safe from certain invasive species. 1. All work vehicles, machinery, and equipment should be cleaned, inspected by its user, and found free of mud, dirt, debris and invasive species prior to entry into the natural areas or native habitat. a. Vehicles, machinery, and equipment must be thoroughly pressure washed in a designated cleaning area and visibly free of mud, dirt, plant debris, insects, frogs (including frog eggs) and other vertebrate species such as rats, mice and non -vegetative debris. A hot water wash is preferred. Areas of particular concern include bumpers, grills, hood compartments, areas under the battery, wheel wells, undercarriage, cabs, and truck beds (truck beds with accumulated material (intentionally placed or fallen from trees) are prime sites for hitchhikers). b. The interior and exterior of vehicles, machinery, and equipment must be free of rubbish and food. The interiors of vehicles and the cabs of machinery must be vacuumed clean. Floor mats shall be sanitized with a solution of >70% isopropyl alcohol or a freshly mixed 10% bleach solution. 8 c. Any machinery, vehicles, equipment, or other supplies found to be infested with ants (or other invasive species) must not enter natural areas or native habitat Treatment is the responsibility of the equipment or vehicle owner and operator. 2. Little Fire Ants — All work vehicles, machinery, and equipment should be inspected for invasive ants prior to entering the natural areas or native habitat. a. A visual inspection for little fire ants should be conducted prior to entry into natural areas or native habitat. b. Hygiene is paramount but even the cleanest vehicle can pick up a little fire ant. Place MaxForce Complete Brand Granular Insect Bait (LO% Hydramethylnon; http://littlefireants.com/Maxforce%20Complete.pdf) into refillable tamper resistant bait stations. An example of a commercially available refillable tamper resistant bait station is the Ant Cafe Pro (httos:;i vww.antcafe com%). Place a bait station (or stations) in vehicle. Note larger vehicles, such as trucks, may require multiple stations. Monitor bait stations frequently (every week at a minimum) and replace bait as needed. If the station does not have a sticker to identify the contents, apply a sticker listing contents to the station. c_ Any machinery, vehicles, equipment, or other supplies found to be infested with ants (or other invasive species) must not enter natural areas or native habitat until it is sanitized and re -tested following a resting period. Infested vehicles must be sanitized following recommendations by the Hawaii Ant Lab (http://www.littlefireants.comi) or other ant control expert and in accordance Ms. Kim Narel 9 with all State and Federal laws. Treatment is the responsibility of the equipment or vehicle owner. d. Gravel, building materials, or other equipment such as portable buildings should be baited using MaxForce Complete Brand Granular Insect Bait (1.0°% Hydramethylnon; http:/ilittlefireants.coni/Maxforce%20Complete.pdf) or AmdroPro (0.73°% Hydramethylnon; http://littlefireants.com/Amdro%20Pro.pdf) following label guidance. e. Storage areas that hold field tools, especially tents, tarps, and clothing should be baited using MaxForce Complete Brand Granular Insect Bait (1.0% Hydramethylnon; littp://littlefireants.com/Maxforce%20Complete.ndf) or AmdroPro (0.73% Hydramethylnon; http://littlefireants.com/Amdro°%20Pro.pdt) following label guidance. 3. Base yards and staging areas inside and outside areas must be kept free of invasive species. a. Base yards and staging areas should be inspected at least weekly for invasive species and any found invasive removed immediately. Pay particular attention to where vehicles are parked ovemight, keeping areas within 10 -meters of vehicles free of debris. Parking on pavement and not under trees, while not always practical is best. b. Project vehicles or equipment stored outside of a base yard or staging area, such as a private residence, should be kept in a pest free area. 4. All cutting tools must be sanitized to prevent the Rapid Ohia Death (ROD) fungus. a. Avoid wounding ohia trees and roots with mowers, chainsaws, weed eaters, and other tools. Cut only the minimum amount of trees and branches as approved for the project. b. All cutting tools, including machetes, chainsaws, and toppers must be sanitized to remove visible dirt and other contaminants prior to entry into natural areas or areas with native habitat, and when moving to a new project area within the native habitat area. Tools may be sanitized using a solution of>70% isopropyl alcohol or a freshly mixed 10% bleach solution. One minute after sanitizing, you may apply an oil based lubricant to chainsaw chains or other metallic parts to prevent corrosion. c. Only dedicated tools and chainsaws should be used to sample known or suspected ROD infected trees. d. Vehicles, machinery, and equipment must be cleaned as described in (1) above. 5. Imported firewood, logs, and ohia parts: a. Ohia firewood, ohia logs, and ohia parts should not be transported. 6. For individuals working in the field: a. Before going into the field, visually inspect and clean your clothes, boots, pack, radio harness, tools and other personal gear and equipment, for seeds, soil, plant parts, insects, and other debris. A small brush is handy for cleaning boots, equipment and gear. Soles of shoes should be sanitized using a solution of >70% isopropyl alcohol or a freshly mixed 10% bleach solution. Ms. Kim Narel 10 b. Immediately before leaving the field, visually inspect and clean your clothes, boots, pack, radio harness, tools, and other personnel gear and equipment, for seeds, soil, plant parts, insects, and other debris. Soles of shoes should be sanitized using a solution of >70% isopropyl alcohol or a freshly mixed 10% bleach solution. c. Little fire ants nest in trees. If you are under a tree and that tree is bumped or somehow stressed, the threat response of the ants is to fall from the leaves and sting the person under the tree. If you are subject to an ant attack, do not panic. The ants are extremely small but their stings are painful so make sure you remove all ants from your body and clothing. The stings cause inch long welts that are itchy and painful, and can last for weeks. Treat stings as you would other insect stings. In some persons stings can produce life threatening reactions. Stocking antihistamine in the first aid kit is a reasonable precaution. d. Rat Lungworm disease is caused by a parasite that can infect humans who consume raw or undercooked infected snails or slugs or consume raw produce that contains a small infected snail or slug. Infection is rare but can be serious. Symptoms can include severe headache, neck stiffness, low grade fever, nausea, and vomiting anywhere from 1-6 weeks after exposure. The disease is not spread person to person. Anyone who handles snails or slugs should wear gloves and/or wash hands. Eating unwashed produce is discouraged. Literature cited Wagner, W.L., Sohmer, S., and D.R. Herbst. 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii, revised edition. Honolulu, Hawaii. University of Hawaii and Bishop Museum Press. 1,919 pp. Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii PREPARED FOR EBI Consulting SWCA Environmental Consultants THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES REPORT FOR THE AT&T MOBILITY LLC PROJECT IN LEILANI ESTATES, PUNA, ISLAND AND COUNTY OF HAWAII Prepared for EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, Massachusetts 01803 Attn: Chris Baird Prepared by James Breeden, Alex Lau, Amanda Ehrenkrantz and Julie Gaertner SWCA Environmental Consultants 1200 Ala Moana Blvd, #380 Honolulu, Hawaii 96814 808) 5484922 www.swca.corn SWCA Project No. 60984 May 2020 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii ABSTRACT/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EBI Consulting contracted SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to conduct a federally and state - listed endangered species survey for the construction of the proposed AT&T Mobility LLC 100 -foot monopole telecommunications compound (proposed project). The survey area for the proposed project is approximately 3.75 acres of a property located at Tax Map Key (3)1-3-001:007 near Leilani Estates in the District of Puna at 13-3820 Palma Kalapana Road, Hawai i, 96778. This report summarizes the findings of the federally and state -listed endangered species survey conducted for the proposed project by SWCA biologist Julie Gaertner on May 7, 2020; describes the methods used to conduct the survey; discusses the results of the investigation; and provides recommendations to avoid and minimize impacts of the proposed project based on SWCA's professional opinion. No federally or state -listed endangered birds were observed in the survey area during the survey. Habitat for the federally and state -listed Hawaiian goose ()drama sandvicensis), Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiunts cinereus semotms), and ha`iwale (Cvrtandra nanawaleensis); and the state -listed Hawaiian hawk (Buten solitaries) occurs in the survey arca. In addition, the federally and state -listed band -romped stomm-petrel Oceanodroma ca,stro), Hawaiian petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis), and Newell's shearwatcr (Pufflnus auricularis newelli) may By over the survey arca while traveling to and from their upland nesting sites to deep water marine foraging habitat. Furthermore, suitable habitat for ha`iwale is known to occur in the general vicinity of proposed project, Avoidance and minimization recommendations to address potential impacts to Hawaiian hawk, Hawaiian goose, band-rumped stone -petrel, Hawaiian petrel, Hawaiian hoary bat, and ha`iwale are outlined in the report. With the application of the avoidance and minimization measures, the proposed project is not expected to have a significant, adverse effect on federally or state - listed plants and wildlife. Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in LeHeni Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hewail Title page intensional! Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii CONTENTS Abstract/Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 2 Description of the Survey Arca 1 3 Methods 1 3.1 Species Identification 1 3.2 Background Information 2 3.3 Field Reconnaissance 2 3.4 Species Evaluation 3 4 Results 3 4.1 Species Evaluation 3 5 Effects Analysis 6 5.1.1 Hawaiian Hawk 6 5.1.2 Hawaiian Goose 6 5.1.3 Hawaiian Seabirds 7 5.1.4 Hawaiian Hoary Bat 8 5.1.5 Ha'iwale 9 6 Avoidance and Minimization Measures 9 6.1 Hawaiian Hawk 9 6.1 Hawaiian Goose L0 6.2 Hawaiian seabirds 10 6.3 Hawaiian Hoary Bat 10 6.4 Ha`iwale 11 7 Summary and Conclusions 11 8 Limitations And Warranty 11 9 Literature Cited 12 Appendix A. Figures Appendix B. USFWS Correspondence Appendix C. Photographs Appenidx D. Resumes Appendices Tables Table 1. Listed Species with Potential to Occur in the Survey Area 2 Table 2. Vegetation Communities in the Survey Arca 2 Table 3. Species Federally and State -Listed as Endangered or Threatened, Proposed, or Candidatc Species with Potential to Occur in the Survey Area 4 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the ATILT Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawai t Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii 1 INTRODUCTION EBI Consulting contracted SWCA Environmental Consultants (SWCA) to conduct a federally and state - listed endangered species survey for the construction of the proposed AT&T Mobility LLC 100 -foot monopole telecommunications compound (proposed project). A threatened and endangered species survey is necessary to ensure listed species are not impacted by construction of the tower, The survey area for the proposed project is located at 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Hawai`i, 96778 (Figure 1, Appendix A). This report describes the methods used to conduct the evaluation, the results of the investigation, and species avoidance and minimization measures. This report does not serve as a project clearance letter for the above-referenccd project but provides a professional opinion on the potential for construction activities on the aforementioned site to impact federally and statc-listed threatened or endangered species known to inhabit the survey area. 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SURVEY AREA The survey area is located in the district of Puna approximately 15 feet to the west of the intersection of Pahoa Kalapana Road (Highway 130) and Opihikao Quarry access road south of mile marker 15. It occurs within a portion of Tax Map Kcy: TMK: (3)1-3-001:007. The survey area is approximately 3.75 acres and mostly surrounded by undeveloped land with some residential areas. It consists of the proposed project footprint plus a 100 -foot buffer. The intent of surveying the buffer is to provide context to the habitat of the proposed project footprint and inform potential shifts of the exact footprint, if needed. The elevation of the survey arca is approximately 1,065 feet above sea level, and the topography is generally flat with a slight decrease in elevation toward the east. A natural gulch approximately 50 feet wide runs in the east—west direction on the northern portion of the survey area. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) identifies the following two soil types in the survey arca: Malama extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material 2 to 40 percent slopes (659) and Olaa cobbly hydrous loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes(660) (NRCS 2020). Mean annual rainfall for this arca is approximately 136.4 inches. Rainfall is typically highest in November and lowest in May and June Giambelluca et al. 2013). 3 METHODS SWCA reviewed available scientific and technical literature regarding natural resources in and near the survey area. This literature review encompassed a thorough search of referenced scientific journals, technical journals and reports, Bishop Museum herbarium records, critical habitat maps, relevant government documents, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) online data, and unpublished data that provide insight into the area's natural history and ecology. SWCA also reviewed available geospatial data, aerial photographs, and topographic maps of survey area. 3.1 Species Identification The species evaluated in this report were based upon information obtained from USFWS correspondence dated March 13, 2020 (Appendix B) and corroborated by SWCA. Based on this correspondence, a natural resource assessment was conducted for the species listed in Table 1. Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawari Table 1. Listed Species with Potential to Occur in the Survey Area Common Name Scientific Name State Status Federal Status Hawaiian hawk Buten solitarius Endangered Not listed Hawaiian goose Branca sandvrcensis Endangered Endangered Band-rumped atom -petrel Oceanodroma Castro Endangered Endangered Hawaiian petrel Pterodroma sandwichensis Endangered Endangered Newell's shearwater Puminus auricularis newelli Threatened Threatened Hawanan hoary bat Lasiuros clnereus semolus Endangered Endangered Haiwale Cyrtandra nanawaeensis Endangered Endangered 3.2 Background Information The potential for occurrence within the survey area for the specks addressed in this report was based on 1) documented occurrences, 2) existing information on distribution, and 3) qualitative comparisons of the habitat requirements of each species with vegetation communities (Table 2) or landscape features observed within the survey area. Possible impacts to these species resulting from construction of the proposed project were evaluated based on reasonably foreseeable project -related activities. Vegetation conununities were determined by ground truthing vegetation classes identified in a geographic information system (GIS) by the Hawaii Gap analysis program (HIGAP), which identified the survey area as containing two vegetation types: open `ohi'a forest, and closed `6hi`a forest, Upon visitation of the site, it was determined that significant changes had occurred to the dominant canopy species, `ohi'a Metro.videros polvmorpha), where many individuals have died, presumably from recent forest pathogens affecting the area, volcanic emissions, and/or invasion by non-native plants, resulting in a mixed bhi`a/non-native forest vegetation type; this vegetation type occupied all forested portions of the survey area. The remaining vegetated portions of the surrey area were limited to the margins of the existing road, which consisted of ruderal vegetation. This vegetation type was dominated by low -growing, herbaceous, non-native species. Table 2. Vegetation Communities in the Survey Area Land Cover Area Acreage Percent of Survey Area Mixed'o&a/non-nairve forest 3.19 85 Ruderal vegetation 0.38 5 Bare ground/road 0 t8 10 Total 3.75 100 3.3 Field Reconnaissance SWCA conducted a survey of the project area on May 7, 2020. Photographs of the project area at the time of site reconnaissance are included in Appendix C. SWCA utilized global positioning system (GPS) data uploaded with the survey area location for general orientation and locating the boundaries of the proposed project. The field reconnaissance consisted or pedestrian visual surveys to evaluate the absence or 2 1 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii presence of suitable habitat of listed species within the survey area. Any occurrences of listed species were documented, if found, but the survey area was not cleared for all potential occurrences of listed species. 3.4 Species Evaluation The potential for occurrence of each federally listed species was summarized according to the categories listed below, This methodology was also utilized to evaluate state -listed species. The rationale for category assignment is provided after each category in Table 3. Potential for occurrence categories are as follows: Known to occur—the species has been documented in the survey area by a reliable observer. May occur—the survey area is within the species' currently known range, and habitat types within the project area resemble those known to be used by the species. Unlikely to occur—the survey arca is within the species' currently known range, but habitat types within the project area do not resemble those known to be used by the species. Does not occur— the survey arca is clearly outside the species' currently known range. Those species listed by the USFWS as candidate, threatened, or endangered species were assigned to one of three categories of possible effect, following USFWS recommendations. The evaluation of impacts to species is limited to the survey area and does not assess the impacts to the species or their habitats at regional or global levels. The effects determinations recommended by the USFWS include the following: May affect, is likely to adversely affect/May impact—adverse effects to listed species may occur as a direct or indirect result of the proposcd project, and the effect is not discountable, insignificant, or beneficial. May affect, is not likely to adversely affect/May impact—the proposed project may affect listed species and/or critical habitat; however, the effects are expected to be discountable, insignificant, or completely beneficial. No effect—the proposed project will not affect federally listed species or critical habitat. 4 RESULTS 4.1 Species Evaluation SWCA evaluated impacts of the proposed project on those species identified in Table I. Table 3 summarizes each species' habitat requirements, potential for occurrence in the survey area, and effect determination. No federally or state -listed species were detected during field reconnaissance surveys. Therefore, the effect determination for the species is based on the field reconnaissance habitat assessment, best available literature, and spatial data collected from resources cited in this report, and that the avoidance and minimization measures arc followed. A further evaluation is provided for species with potential to occur within the survey area. 3 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT87 Mobility LLC Project in Lenora Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii Table 3. Species Federally and State - Listed as Endangered or Threatened, Proposed, or Candidate Species with Potential to Occur in the Survey Area Common Name scientific name) Status' Range or Habitat Requirementat Potential for Occurrence in Survey Area Determination of Effect hawaiien hawk (&( ec, State erietartust endangered The Hawaiian hawk depends on native forest for nesting and is able to use a broad range of habitats tar foraging, rodding papaya and macadamia nut orchards. as well as forests dominated by native and introduce0 vegetation. from sea level to P530 feet { USFWS 2024 May occur in the survey area. The survey area contains habitat features that could support Hawaiian Hawk nesting and foraging. May affect. but s not tkely m adversey affect, Hawaiian goose Federally and lerar, t.a samara; nsre stateendangered The Hawaiian goose occupies vario+ v habitat types including beach etrard, shrubiand. grassland, and lava rock at elevations ranging from feasted ( upends to atatine areas ( Bank, 1966. Ranke et al 1999; Hawaii Department C( Land and Natural Resources ICLNR) 2015a; USEWS 2004). On the island of Hawaii, this species is known to otCLW beN, een sea level and 7400 feet above sea level, It ( ices nor require starting or flowing water for successful breeding but wilt use fl when available, its current distribution has been highly influenced by captive - bred releases into the wild. Band - rum oed stem- Federally and peeel state Oceanodmme castor) endangered in Hawaii, nest initiatbn takes place in May with fledgling leaving nest colonies in October ( DLNR 20154 Ort the island of Hawaii. nesting Oat* above 6900 feet asl in burrows or crevices to rock or Teva ( OLNR 2015a). Deity flights are made to and from pelagic foraging grounds. Urstkery to occur M t romped slmm- pettei may fly over the area al night while transiting between ne and the ocean. but they are not ! kW/ to land use habitat because nesting habitat does not exist et ore survey gree. May affect. but is not Likely to adversely aged. Hawaiian petrel Pleretlmmasandwichensis) Federally and staleendangered Hawaiian Retro a Ready arrive at breeding wlan es in February. and young 9adge in October and November ( Pyle and Pyle 2017). On the island of Newark nesting occurs above 8200 feet 41 to xeric habitats with very sparse vegetation, with most nests al existing crevices in Teva 101 - NR 2Ct5a)- Daily flights are made to and from pelagic foraging grounds. UNikeyte occur in the survey area Hawattan petters may fly over the survey ares al night while transiting between nest saes and the ocean, but they are not nicely to land or use habitat because nesting habitat does not occur in the survey area. May affect, but is not likely 10 adversely affect Newel' s sheanwater Federally and Neweii' s shsarwaters arrive al bleeding colonies in gait and PuTinus auricularis slate threatened temporally leave for approximately 3 to 4 weeks before returning to newel?) nest, Nesting occurs above 525 to 3, 036 feet asi ( DINR 2015a). Most young dodge by the end November ( Ainley et a1. 2020}. On the island of Hawaii,, they nest valhin forested cinder CAMS to areas of open nalh a forest dominated by' dhl' e ( Metreskiaros polymoryka) with a dense understory of' Atte fern ( tkcrenopteris means) ( OLNR 2015al. Daily flights are made to and from pelagic foraging grounds. Uni- ue to occur in the survey area. Newell' s May affect, but is not shea, Nwaters may fry over the survey area P likely to adversely night white trans1ing between nest sties and the affect ocean, but they are not Ilkety to ' said or use habitat because casing Habitat does not exist 0 the survey area, 4 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT& T Mobility LLC Project in Locant Estates, Puna. lstarxt and Camp] of Hawaii Common Name Scientific name{ UAW' Rang. or Habitat Requirement& P or uccurrance Determination of Effect Hawaiian May bat Federally and This spades is Lound unmanly from sea level to 71500 teet act. On May occur in the survey area. The survey area May aMlec. but is not Labium cinereas state the Shand of Hawat+, the Hawaiian hoary bat has been observed contains habitats that coon support Hawaiian likely to adversely sonatas) endangered above 13, 000 feel * al ( OLNR 2015a), Most of me available hoary bat rousting and foraging. affect, documentation suggests that this elusive bat roosts in trees above 15 feet dib ( p( NR 2015b) among trews n forested areas, It forages in a broad range of hatvtats, tl has been observed on the islands of Hawaii', Mato, Molokai, Oahu. and Kauai. Habrale ( Cyttendra Federally and This plant species is endemic Io lowland wet forests in the Puna May occrn in Me survey area which con{ aloe May aftact. butts naoawaleensls) state Diana on the sand of Hawaii. and typically occurs in the forest habitat and is within the known range of the likely to adversely endangered understory, species. affect Threatened and Endangered Species Report for AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County ofHawaii 5 EFFECTS ANALYSIS The six wildlife and single plant federally and state -protected species that may be affected by the proposed action arc discussed in detail in this section. These species arc Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius), Hawaiian goose (Branco sardricensis); Hawaiian petrel (Pterodrama sandu9chensis), Newell's shearwater (J'unus auricularis newelli), and band-runrped storm -petrel (Oceanodronra Castro) collectively referred to as seabirds); Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinercros semolus); and ha`iwale Calandra nanaunleensis)_ 5.1.1 Hawaiian Hawk Life History and Range Requirements: The Hawaiian hawk is the only broad -winged hawk that breeds on the Big Island of Hawaii (USFWS 2009). They can be found from sea level to 8,530 feet (USFWS 2020). Surveys in 2007 indicated that approximately 3,085 Hawaiian hawks inhabited the Big Island Gorressen et al. 2008; USFWS 2020). These hawks construct their ncsts approximately 2 months before laying eggs, and thc nests may be used for several years as the hawks add new material. Nest trees are typically 32.81 to 78.74 feet in height, and thc nests arc typically located 11.48 to 59.06 feet above the ground. Nest trees have a diameter at breast height averaging 19.68 inches, although some trees with a diameter at breast height of 4.02 inches are used. Nests are constructed on stable platforms such as on top of birds -nest ferns (Aspleninm nidus), in the crotches of tree trunks, on branches 7.87 to 19.67 inches in diameter, and at the intersections of the trunks and branches smaller than 7.87 inches in diameter (Griffin et al. 1998). Potential for Occurrence: Although the Hawaiian hawk or its nests were not observed during the survey, the Hawaiian hawk is known to occur in the surrounding arca and suitable nesting and foraging habitat is present (Gorressen et al. 2008). Hawks could nest in the trees that are at or above 30 feet tall in the mixed bhi`aJnon-native forest vegetation types and forage in and over all the vegetation types. Determination of Impact: Nesting hawks could occur in the survey arca. Nesting hawks could be impacted by noise and activity associated with construction of the proposed project. Foraging hawks may be temporarily displaced from thc survey area during construction because ofthc presence of human noise and activity. However, because the area is along a road, it is likely that local hawks are habituated to human noise and may not be greatly affected. The surrounding area provides a relatively Large area of homogeneous habitat suitable for Hawaiian hawk foraging. Because ofthis, it is likely that sufficient prey would be available nearby. After construction, birds are expected to return to the survey area to forage. After the cellular tower is built, human activity related to the project will cease, except for occasional maintenance checks. The Hawaiian hawk will not be negatively affected by the presence of thc tower. In fact, individuals could benefit from the tower by using it as a roost or hunting perch. If the avoidance and minimization measures discussed is Section 6 are followed during construction activities, it is expected that the project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Hawaiian hawk. 5.1.2 Hawaiian Goose Life History and Range Requirements: The Hawaiian goose is known to occupy various habitat types ranging from beach strand, shrubland, and grassland to lava rock at elevations ranging from coastal lowlands to alpine areas (Banko 1988; Banko et al. 1999). The Hawaiian goose has an extended breeding season, with eggs reported from all months except May, June, and July, although most of the birds in the Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&TMobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii wild nest during the rainy (winter) season between October and March (Banko et al. 1999: Kcar and Berger 1980). Hawaiian geese nest on the ground in a shallow scrape in the dense shade of a shrub or other vegetation. During molt, adults arc flightless for a period of 4 to 6 weeks. Molt occurs alicr hatching of eggs, such that the adults generally attain thcir flight feathers at about the same time as their offspring. When flightless, goslings and adults arc extremely vulnerable to predators such as dogs, cats, and mongoose. From June to September, family groups join others in post -breeding aggregations (flocks), often far from nesting areas. Potential for Occurrence: The survey area is out of the historic and current range of the Hawaiian goose Hess et al. 2012: Leopold and Hess 2014; USFWS 2004). Although not observed during the survey, recently translocated Hawaiian geese from outer islands may occupy areas where they are not historically known to occur. Therefore, Hawaiian geese may occasionally be present or fly over the survey arca. Determination of impact: Direct impacts to the Hawaiian goose could occur during vegetation removal if a nest is damaged or goslings are separated from adults. However, direct impacts are unlikely to occur as long as the avoidance and minimization measures arc implemented as described in Section 6. In the short term, the human noise and disturbance associated with construction activities could temporarily displace the Hawaiian goose from nesting and/or foraging habitats. Displacement from available nesting and/or foraging habitat could impact the health of these individuals; however, because a small amount of foraging habitat would be removed, it would not likely affect nest success or population growth. Furthermore, foraging and nesting habitat is available adjacent to the survey arca, into which the Hawaiian goose could move. If the avoidance and minimization measures discussed is Section 6 arc followed during construction activities, it is expected that the project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Hawaiian goose. 5.1.3 Hawaiian Seabirds Life History and Range Requirements: The band -romped storm -petrel, Hawaiian petrel, and Newell's shcanvater are known to nest on the island of Hawai`i. They are discussed as a group in this section because of similar habitat needs and behaviors. The types of habitat used for Hawaiian seabird nesting are diverse and range from xeric environments with little or no vegetation to wet forests dominated by `bhi'a with `uluhe understory. Nests are located in various naturally occurring features such as lava tubes, cracks in tumuli (fractured hills on the surface of pahoehoe flows), spaces created by uplift of pahoehoe slabs, and other miscellaneous natural features (DLNR 2015a; Hu et al. 2001; Mitchell et al. 2005; Pyle and Pyle 2009). The band-rumped storm -petrel is known to nest in high -elevation remote locations; Hawaiian petrel nesting occurs at or above 8,200 feet above sea level; and the Newell's shearwater is known to nest between 525 and 3.936 feet above sea level (DLNR 2015a; Mitchell et al. 2005). Individuals, especially juveniles, are known to be attracted to human -made light sources, which increases their likelihood of mortality once grounded. Potential for Occurrence: Nest and foraging habitat does not occur in the survey area. The survey area is below the elevational threshold of nesting habitat for the band-ntmped storm -petrel and Hawaiian petrel. The survey area is located approximately 3.5 miles from and in between two potential Newell's Shearwater nest colonies (Figure 2, Appendix A) (Reynolds and Ritchotte 1995). Hawaiian seabirds make daily long-distance excursions from their upland nesting sites to deep water marine foraging habitat and may fly over the survey area while traveling to and from their nest colonies. Furthermore, nighttime lighting has been shown to be an attractant to Hawaiian seabirds and could attract them to the survey area. 7 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawa! f Determination of Impact: The survvcy area docs not provide suitable nesting or foraging habitat for the Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shearwatcr, and band -romped storm -petrel. However, breeding individuals may Ily over the survey area at night while travelling between upland nesting and ocean foraging sites. Seabirds will typically fly in circles above the lights until they become too fatigued to fly, which can cause them to collide with nearby structures or land on the ground from exhaustion. Disorientation and fallout as a result of light attraction could occur to individuals attracted to nighttime lighting. The avoidance and minimization measures regarding nighttime lighting would reduce the potential for light - attraction impacts to these species. If the avoidance and minimization measures discussed is Section 6 are followed during construction activities, it is expected that the proposed project may affect. but is not likely to adversely affect Hawaiian seabirds. 5.1.4 Hawaiian Hoary Bat Life History and Range Requirements: The Hawaiian hoary bat is known to occur on all of the main Hawaiian islands and has been observed from sea level to approximately 13,000 feet (DLNA 2015a, 2015b). Hawaiian hoary bats use both closed habitats near vegetation such as tunneled roadways and open habitats adjacent to forests, above tree canopies, and over open oceans (Jacobs 1996). Hawaiian hoary bats are insectivores and are regularly observed foraging over streams, reservoirs, and wetlands up to 300 feet offshore (U.S. Department of Agriculture 2009). Hawaiian hoary bats forage in open, wooded, and linear habitats within a wide range of vegetation types (USFWS 1998). The bat typically roosts in trees greater than 15 feet tall in dense canopy foliage or in the subcanopy when canopy is sparse, with open access for launching into flight (U.S. Department ofAgriculture 2009). Potential for Occurrence: Although the Hawaiian hoary bat was not detected during the survey, suitable forage and roost habitat for the Hawaiian hoary bat is present. Foraging may occur over all the vegetation types and roosting may occur in trees greater than 15 feet tall in the survey area. Determination of Impact: Direct impacts to bats could occur during vegetation removal if ajuvenile bat that is too small to fly but too large to be carried by a parent is present in a tree or branch that is cut down. However, because of the avoidance and minimization measure that trees would not be cut during the breeding season (June I—September 15), direct impacts are unlikely to occur. The potential for direct impacts would also be reduced by ensuring the top wire strand of surrounding fences (if present) is barbless, as listed in the conservation measures, so that individuals are not snagged. In the short term, the human noise and disturbance associated with construction activities in the survey area could temporarily displace bats from roosting and/or foraging habitats. This displacement could alter an individual's typical foraging and roosting patterns, forcing it to expend energy to search for new foraging and roosting locations. Displacement from roosting habitat could lead to increased predation on individual bats, especially if a bat is forced to leave its roost during daylight hours, making it more visible to potential predators. If the avoidance and minimization measures discussed is Section 6 are followed during construction activities, it is expected that the project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect the Hawaiian hoary bat. 8 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Loden( Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii 5.1.5 Hariwale Life History and Range Requirements: This plant species has only been documented from lowland wet forest in the Puna district of Hawaii Island. According to a 2019 USFWS Recovery outline, the population is estimated to include approximately 160 individuals in five populations (USFWS 2019), mostly documented in forest reserves, but also documented from private land (USFWS 2013). It typically grows as a shrub, often in low light levels of the forest understory. Potential for Occurrence: This species was not encountered during the SWCA survey. However, lowland wet forest habitat and native species assemblages were observed, indicating it has the potential to occur in the survey arca. One of the populations ofthis species occurs in the Keauohana Forest Reserve, which is approximately 1.5 miles from the survey arca. Determination of Impact: No individuals were encountered during the survey. Because suitable habitat exists throughout the survey arca in the mixed'dhi'a/non-native forest vegetation type, it may occur in the survey area. If present, impacts to individuals could occur when clearing vegetation, resulting in either mortality, crushing by falling trees, or increased light levels favoring species adapted to higher light levels. No beneficial impacts are anticipated If the avoidance and minimization measures discussed in Section 6 arc followed and a biological monitor who is able to identify the species is present during construction activities, it is expected that the project may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect ha`iwale . 6 AVOIDANCE AND MINIMIZATION MEASURES Regular on-site staff should be trained to identify federally and state -listed species that have the potential to occur on-site and should know the appropriate measures to be taken if they are present. To minimize potential impacts to threatened and endangered species, avoidance and minimization measures should be followed, as detailed in the following sections. 6.1 Hawaiian Hawk If work must be conducted during the March I through September 30 Hawaiian hawk breeding season, a qualified biologist should conduct a nest search of the survey area and surrounding areas immediately prior to the start of construction activities. Pre -construction surveys for Hawaiian hawk are valid for 14 days. If disturbance for the survey arca docs not occur within 14 days of the survey, an additional survey is required. No vegetation clearing or construction activities should occur within 1,600 feet of any active Hawaiian hawk nest until the chicks have fledged. No trimming or cutting trees containing an active or inactive Hawaiian hawk nest is allowed, as nests may be re -used for consecutive breeding seasons. Diverters should be installed on the cell tower to discourage the Hawaiian hawk from nesting and/or perching, 9 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii 6.1 Hawaiian Goose Do not approach, feed, and/or disturb Hawaiian geese. If Hawaiian geese are observed loafing or foraging within the survey arca during the breeding season (September through April), a biologist familiar with the nesting behavior of the Hawaiian goose should conduct a nest survey in and around the survey area prior to the continuations of any work. Surveys should be repeated after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days during which the birds may attempt to nest). If a Hawaiian goose nest is discovered, all work within a 150 -foot radius should cease and the USFWS should be contacted for further guidance. In areas where Hawaiian geese are known to occur, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about their presence. 6.2 Hawaiian seabirds Construction activity should be restricted to daylight hours as much as practicable during the seabird pcak fallout period (September 15—December 15) to avoid the use ofnighttime lighting that could attract seabirds. All outdoor lights should be shielded to prevent upward radiation. This has been shown to reduce the potential for seabird attraction. Outside lights not needed for security and safety should be turned off from dusk through dawn during the fledgling fallout period (September 15—December 15). The profile of the tower should be reduced as much as practicable to reduce the extent of the tower that extends above the surrounding vegetation and avoid the use of guywires. If the top of the tower must be lit to comply with Federal Aviation Administration regulations, use a flashing red light verses a steady -beam red or white light. Where practicable, co -locate with existing towers and/or facilities. In areas where fences extend above vegetation, integrate three strands ofpolytape into the fence to increase visibility. Cables such as powerlines and guywires should minimize exposure above vegetation height and vertical profile. Coordination with the USFWS is recommended to address specific project components and potential seabird interactions. 6.3 Hawaiian Hoary Bat If felling of standing trees occurs during the bat breeding season (June 1—September 15), direct impacts could occur to juvenile bats that are too small to fly but too large to be carried by a parent. To minimize this impact, no trees taller than 15 feet should be trimmed or removed during this season. The use of barbless top -strand wire is recommended for all fence construction to avoid entanglement of Hawaiian hoary bat. 10 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County ofHawaii 6.4 Ha`iwale A botanical monitor should be on-site during my activities That involve moving heavy equipment over vegetation andor the removal of vegetation to ensure ha'iwale is not impacted. The botanical monitor should possess the following qualifications: o Familiarity with the plants of the arca, including federal and stale -listed species o Familiarity with natural communities of the area, including federal and state -listed natural communities o Experience conducting floristic field surveys o Experience with analyzing impacts of development on native plant species and natural communities The USFWS avoidance and minimization measures for plants, included m Appendix B, Table B-1, should be reviewed and used as a guideline to determine minimum distances from which specific actions can occur from endangered plants, based on plant form 7 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS SWCA performed a status review for six federally and state -listed and one state -listed species identified in the correspondence received from USFWS for the proposed project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Hawaii Appendix B). This review included a field reconnaissance and habitat assessment, as well as a desktop literature and spatial data review of best available data. Based on our findings, we believe that the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to adversely affect Hawaiian hawk, Hawaiian goose, band - ramped storm -petrel, Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shcarwater, Hawaiian hoary bat, and/or ha`iwale . Resumes of SWCA personnel conducting this assessment have been included in Appendix D. 8 LIMITATIONS AND WARRANTY Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope of work, SWCA warrants that this study was conducted in accordance with accepted presence/absence survey practices, including the technical guidelines, evaluation criteria, and species' listing status in effect al the time this evaluation was performed. The results and conclusions of this report represent the best professional judgment of SWCA scientists. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made. Please be aware that only the USFWS and/or lead federal agency can determine compliance with the Endangered Species Act. 11 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County ofHawai i 9 LITERATURE CITED Ainley, D.G., T.C. Telfer, M.H. Reynolds, and A.F. Raine (2020). Newell's Shearwater (Puffin us newelli), version 10. In Birds of the World. edited by P.G. Rodcwald. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, New York. Banko, P.C. 1988. Breeding biology and conservation of the Nene, Hawaiian goose (Nesochen sandvicensis). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle. 255 pp. Banko, P.C., J.M. Black, and W.E. Banko. 1999. Hawaiian Goose (Nene) (Branta sandvicensis). In The Birds ofNorth America, No. 434, edited by A. Poole and F. Gill. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Giambelluca, T.W., Q. Chen, A.G. Frazier, J.P. Price, Y. -L. Chen, P. -S. Chu, J.K. Eischeid, and D.M. Delparte, 2013. Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawai' i. Bulletin ofthe American Meteorological Society 94: 313-316. Gorresscn, M.P., R.J. Camp, J.L. Klavitter, and T.K. Pratt. 2008. Abundance, Distribution, and Population Trend of the Hawaiian Hawk: 1998-2007 (HSCU-009). Hilo, Hawaii: Hawaii Cooperative Studies Unit. Griffin, C.R., P.W.C. Paton, and T.S. Baskett. 1998. Breeding ecology and behavior of the Hawaiian hawk. Condor 100:654-662. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DNLR). 2015a. Hawai `i Iv Slate Wildlife Action Plan. Prepared by H. T. Harvey and Associates, Honolulu, Hawaii. Available at: haps://dlnr.hawaii.gov/wildlife/files/2016/12/H1-SWAP-2015.pdf. Accessed on May 11, 2020. 2015b. Endangered Species Recovery Committee Hawaiian Hoary Bat Guidance Document. Available at: https://dlnr.hawaii.gov/wildlife/files/2018/07/Bat-White-Paper-Guidance_2015- FINAL.pdf. Accessed on May 11, 2020. Hess, S.C., C.R. Leopold, K. Misajon, D. Hu, and J.J. Jeffrey. 2012. Restoration of Movement Pattems of the Hawaiian Goose. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 124(3):478-486. Hu, D., C. Glidden, J.S. Lippert, L. Schnell, J.S. Maclvor, and J. Meislcr. 2001. Habitat use and limiting factors in a population of Hawaiian Dark-rumped Petrels on Mauna Loa, Hawaii. Studies in Avian Biology 22:234-242. Jacobs, D.S. 1996. Morphological divergence in an insular bat, Lasiurus cinereus samaras. Functional Morphology 10:622-6630 Kear, J., and A.J. Berger. 1980. The Hawaiian Goose: an Experiment in Cansen•arion. Vermillion, South Dakota: Butco Books. Leopold, C.R. and S.C. Hess. 2014. Corridor- and stopover -use of the Hawaiian goose (Branla sandvicensis), An Intratropical Altitudinal Migrant. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 30, pp 67-78. Mitchell, C., C. Ogura, D.W. Meadows, A. Kane, L. Strommer, S. Fretz, L. Leonard, and A. McClung. 2005. Hawaii's Comprehensive Wildlife C'onsen•ation Strategy. Submitted to the National Advisory Acceptance Team. October 1, 2005. Honolulu, Hawaii: Department of Land and Natural Resources. 12 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2020. Web Soil Survey. Available at: https://websoilsurvcy,sc,egov.usda.gov'App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed May 2020. Pyle, R.L., and P. Pyle. 2017. The Birds of the Hawaiian Islands: Occurrence, History, Distribution, and Status. B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, HI, U.S.A. Version 2. Available at: h tip: //hbs.bishopmuseum.org/birds/rlp-monograpldpdfs/'02-Gal liformes- Procellariiformes/HAPE.pdf. Accessed May 11, 2020. Reynolds, M.H. and G.L. Ritchotte. 1995. Evidence of Newell's Shearwater Breeding in Puna District, Hawaii. Journal of Field Ornithology 68(1):26-32. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2009. Bats of the U.S. Pacific Islands. Biology Technical Note No. 20. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Pacific Islands Area. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USF W S). 1998. Recovery Plan for the Hawaiian Hoary Bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus). Portland, Oregon: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1. 2004. Draft Revised Recovery plan for the Nene or Hawaiian Goose (Branta sandvicensis). Portland, Oregon: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1. 2009. Recovery of the Hawaiian Hawk or `lo. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/pacificislands/publications/lrawaiianhawkfactsheet012009.pdf Accessed on May 12, 2020. 2013. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Species Status for 15 Species on Hawaii Island. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR- 2013-10-29/pdf/2013-24103.pdf. Accessed May 2020. 2019. Recovery Outline for Hawaii Island. Available at: https://www. fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recoveryidocuments/Hawaii_Island_Recov ery_Outline_20191031.pdf. Accessed May 2020, 2020. Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Hawaiian Hawk from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife. Available at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2020-01-02/pdf/2019-27339.pdfltpage=L Accessed May 2020. 13 APPENDIX A Figures C Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna. Island and County of Hawaii Legend Project Footprint Z1 Survey Buffer 100ft c 150 300root Motors 0 50 100 12.492 National Geo9raphc(2013) Hawari County HI HAD 1983 UTM Zone 5N 5:12/2020 s MWOMVOMMO 0OMI411.1 O{ 1200 Ab Moana 9/Wo 0380 Honokru. Nous. 08814 Phos 808 548 7922 WOAVINKALCOM Figure 1. Location of the survey area. A-1 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii Legend Potential Newell's Shearwater Nest Colony Q Project Area N 0 A K lornr 1.65,000 Nabo'c Geographic (2013) Hawse' Count. HI AO 1093 UTM Zone 5N 5/12/2020 41 k SWCA unrOMrrrAL co.* MMri 1200 AA Moura 64,00388 bnohAj. Fao.i3 98814 P-Kno 008 54 7922 v,wn $.ca.00m Figure 2. Newell's shearwater locations near the survey area. A-2 APPENDIX B USFWS Correspondence United States Department of the Interior In Reply Refer to: OIEPIP002020-SL-0196 FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Pacific Islands Fish and W ildlifc Office 3011 Ala M1hWna Boulevard, Room 3-122 Honolulu, Hawaii 96%50 Kim Narel, Biologist Telecom Environmental South California EBI Office 1501 Quail Street #110 Newport Beach, California 92660 Visit artluuiSLIMWE March L3, 2020 Subject: Species List for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Pima, Island and County of Hawaii Dear Ms. Kim Narel: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) received your correspondence on March 2, 2020, requesting a species list for AT&T Mobility LLC Project located in Leilani Estates in Puna. The Service offers the following comments to assist you in your planning process so that impacts to trust resources can be avoided through site preparation, construction, and operation. Our comments are provided under the authorities of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended (16 U.S.0 1531 et ,seq.), Project Description AT&T Mobility LLC is proposing a new 100 -foot monopole telecommunications compound at Leilani Estate at 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road The project is in undeveloped rainforest Based on information you provided and pertinent information in our files, including data compiled by the Hawaii Biodiversity and Mapping Project, there are two listed animal species in the immediate vicinity of the project area: The federally endangered Hawaiian hoary bat Lasiurus cinereus semotus) and the threatened Hawaiian goose (Branca (Nesochen) sandvicensis), Additionally, the endangered Hawaiian petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis), band- rumped storm -petrel (Oceanodroma custro), and the threatened Newell's shearwater (Puffrnus auricularis newelli) may transit the project area flying to upland breeding colonies. The federally listed plant species, Haiwale (Cyrtandra nanawateensis), may also occur in the vicinity of the project area. The Hawaiian hawk (Buteo solitarius), a species that was recently removed from the federal list of threatened and endangered species, continues to be State -listed as endangered under HRS INTERIOR REGION 9 COLUMBIA -PACIFIC NORTHWEST IDAHO, MONTANA`, ORI -GOND. WASHINGTON TARnAr INTERIOR REGION 12 PACIFIC ISLANDS AMERICAN SAMOA, GUAM, I IAWAII. NORTI TERN MARIANA ISLANDS Ms. Kim Narel 2 195-D. We recommend the identified avoidance and minimization measures (see below) be incorporated into project implementation plans and recommend you coordinate with the Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife, for any further compliance related to Hawaiian hawk. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to listed species, the following measures are recommended: Hawaiian hawk The State -listed Hawaiian hawk is known to occur across a broad range of forest habitats throughout the Island of Hawaii. Loud, irregular and unpredictable activities, such as using heavy equipment or building a structure, near an endangered Hawaiian hawk nest may cause nest failure. Harassment of Hawaiian hawk nesting sites can alter feeding and breeding patterns or result in nest or chick abandonment. Nest disturbance can also increase exposure of chicks and juveniles to inclement weather or predators. To avoid and minimize impacts to Hawaiian hawks we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: If work must be conducted during the March 1 through September 30 Hawaiian hawk breeding season, have a biologist familiar with the species conduct a nest search of the project footprint and surrounding areas immediately prior to the start of construction activities. o Pre -disturbance surveys for Hawaiian hawks are only valid for 14 days. If disturbance for the specific location does not occur within 14 days of the survey, conduct another survey. No clearing of vegetation or construction activities should occur within 1,600 feet of any active Hawaiian hawk nest during the breeding season until the young have fledged. Regardless of the time of year, trees containing a hawk nest should not be cut, as nests may be re -used during consecutive breeding seasons. Hawaiian hoary bat The federally endangered Hawaiian hoary bat roosts in both exotic and native woody vegetation across all islands and will leave young unattended in trees and shrubs when they forage. If trees or shrubs 15 feet or taller are cleared during the pupping season, there is a risk that young bats could inadvertently be harmed or killed since they are too young to fly or may not move away. Additionally, Hawaiian hoary bats forage for insects from as low as 3 feet to higher than 500 feet above the ground and can become entangled in barbed wire used for fencing. To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: Do not disturb, remove, or trim woody plants greater than 15 feet tall during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). Do not use barbed wire for fencing. Ms. Kim Narel Hawaiian goose 3 The federally threatened Hawaiian goose is found on the islands of Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, and Kauai. They are observed in a variety of habitats, but prefer open areas, such as pastures, golf courses, wetlands, natural grasslands and shrublands, and lava flows. Threats to the species include introduced mammalian and avian predators, wind facilities, and vehicle strikes. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian geese we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: Do not approach, feed, or disturb Hawaiian geese. If Hawaiian geese are observed loafing or foraging within the project area during the breeding season (September through April), have a biologist Familiar with the nesting behavior of nene survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. Repeat surveys after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). o Cease all work immediately and contact the Service for further guidance if a nest is discovered within a radius of 150 feet of proposed work, or a previously undiscovered nest is found within said radius after work begins. In areas where Hawaiian geese are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. Hawaiian petrel, Newell's shearwater, and band-rumped storm petrel Hawaiian seabirds may traverse the project area at night during the breeding, nesting and fledging seasons (March 1 to December 15). Outdoor lighting could result in seabird disorientation, fallout, and injury or mortality. Seabirds are attracted to lights and after circling the lights they may become exhausted and collide with nearby wires, buildings, or other structures or they may land on the ground. Downed seabirds are subject to increased mortality due to collision with automobiles, starvation, and predation by dogs, cats, and other predators. Young birds (fledglings) traversing the project area between September 15 and December 15, in their first flights from their mountain nests to the sea are particularly vulnerable. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to seabirds, the project Fully shield all outdoor lights so the bulb can only be seen from below bulb height and only use when necessary. Instal! automatic motion sensor switches and controls on all outdoor tights or turn off tights when human activity is not occurring in the lighted area. Avoid nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 15 through December 15. Listed seabirds have been documented colliding with communication towers, particularly in areas of high seabird passage rate. In general, self-supporting monopoles are the least likely to result in collisions, whereas lattice towers, particularly those that rely on guy -wires, have a higher risk. Ms. Kim Narel 4 To avoid and minimize the likelihood that towers will result in take of listed seabirds we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: The profile of the tower should be as small as possible, minimize the extent of the tower that protrudes above the surrounding vegetation layer, and avoid the use of guywires. if the top of the tower must be lit to comply with Federal Aviation Administration regulations, use a flashing red light verses a steady -beam red or white light. if possible, co -locate with existing towers or facilities. Seabirds have been known to collide with fences, powerlines and other structures near colonies. To avoid and minimize the likelihood of collision we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project description: Where fences extend above vegetation, integrate three strands ofpolytape into the fence to increase visibility. For powerlines, guywires and other cables, minimize exposure above vegetation height and vertical profile. We recommend further coordination with our office to address specific project details and potential seabird interactions. Cyrtandra nanawaleensis Project activities may affect listed plant species by causing physical damage to plant parts (roots, stems, flowers, fruits, seeds, etc.) as well as impacts to other life requisite features of their habitat which may result in reduction of germination, growth and/or reproduction. Cutting and removal of vegetation surrounding listed plants has the potential to alter microlite conditions (e.g., light, moisture, temperature), damaging or destroying the listed plants and also increasing the risk of invasion by nonnative plants which can result in higher incidence or intensity of fire. Activities such as grazing, use of construction equipment and vehicles, and increased human traffic (i.e. trails, visitation, monitoring), can cause ground disturbance, erosion, and/or soil compaction which decrease absorption of water and nutrients and damage plant root systems and may result in reduced growth and/or mortality of listed plants. Soil disturbance or removal has the potential to negatively impact the soil seed bank of listed plant species if such species are present or historically occurred in the project area. To avoid impacts to listed plant species: Minimize potential adverse effects to listed plants that may occur on the proposed project site by minimizing disturbance outside of existing developed or otherwise modified areas. When disturbance outside existing developed or modified sites is proposed, conduct a botanical survey for listed plant species within the project action area, defined as the area where direct and indirect effects are likely to occur. Surveys should be conducted by a knowledgeable botanist with documented experience in identifying native Hawaiian and Pacific Islands plants, including listed plant species. Botanical surveys should optimally be conducted during the wettest part of the year (typically October to April) when plants and identifying features are more likely to be Ms, Kim Narel 5 visible, especially in drier areas. If surveys are conducted outside of the wet season, the Service may assume plant presence. The boundary of the area occupied by listed plants should be marked with flagging by the surveyor. To avoid or rninimize potential adverse effects to listed plants, we recommend adherence to buffer distances for the activities in the Table below. Where disturbed areas do not need to be maintained as an open area, restore disturbed areas using native plants as appropriate for the location. Whenever possible we recommend using native plants for landscaping purposes. The following websites are good resources to use when choosing landscaping plants: Landscape Industry Council of Hawaii Native Plant Poster https//hawaiiscape-wpengine-Com/publications/) Native Hawaiian Plants for Landscaping, Conservation, and Reforestation https)//www-ctahr.hawaii.edufoc/freepubsindffo€3o.pdf) Best Native Plants for Landscapes t https://www-ctahr.haw aii.edu/oc/freepubslpd f/OF 0.pd I) If listed plants occur in a project area, the avoidance buffers are recommended to reduce direct and indirect impacts to listed plants from project activities. However, where project activities will occur within the recommended buffer distances, additional consultation is required. The impacts to the plants of concern within the buffer area may be reduced by placing temporary fencing or other barriers at the boundary of the disturbance, as far from the affected plants as practicable. The above guidelines apply to areas outside of designated critical habitat. Ifproject activities occur within designated critical habitat unit boundaries, additional consultation is required. All activities, including site surveys, risk introducing nonnative species into project areas. Specific attention needs to be made to ensure that all equipment, personnel and supplies are properly checked and are free of contamination (weed seeds, organic matter, or other contaminants) before entering project areas. Quarantines and or management activities occurring on specific priority invasive species proximal to project areas need to be considered or adequately addressed. This infomation can be acquired by contacting local experts such as those on local invasive species committees (Kauai: hmis://www.kauaiisc.oriff. Oahu: https://www-oahuisc.org/- Maui Nui: https:/Imauiinvasive.org/; and Hawaii: httos://www.biisc.ore Table I. Recommended buffer distances to minimize and avoid potential adverse impacts to listed plants from activities listed below. Action Buffer Distance (feet (meters)) - Keep Project Activity This Far Away from Listed Plant Grasses/Herbs/Shrubs and Terrestrial Orchids Trees and Arboreal Orchids Walking, hiking, surveys 3 ft(1 rn) 3 ft (1 m) Ms. Kim Narel 6 Cutting and Removing Vegetation By Hand or Hand Tools (e.g., weeding) 3 ft (I m) 3 ft (1 m) Mechanical Removal of Individual Plants or Woody Vegetation (e.g.,vegetationgchainsaw, weed eater) 3 ft up to height of removed vegetation whichever greater) 3 ft up to height of vegetation whichever greater) Removal of Vegetation with Heavy Equipment (e.g., bulldozer, tractor, "bush hog") 2x width equipment + height of vegetation 820 ft (250 m) Use of Approved Herbicides following label) Ground-based Spray Application; hand application (no wand applicator; spot treatment) 10 ft (3 m) Crown diameter Ground-based Spray Application; manual pump with wand, backpack 50 ft (15 m) Crown diameter Ground-based Spray Application; vehicle- mounted tank sprayer 50 ft (15 in) Crown diameter Aerial Spray (ball applicator) 250 ft (76 m) 250 ft (76 m) Aerial Application — herbicide ballistic technology (individual plant treatment) 100 ft (30 m) Crown diameter Aerial Spray (boom) Further consultation required Further consultation required Use of Insec irides (pollinators, seed dispersers) Ground/Soil Disturbance/Outplanting/Fencing (Hand tools, e.g. shovel, TO; Small mechanized tools, e.g., auger) 20 ft (6 m) 2x crown diameter Ground/Soil Disturbance (Heavy Equipment) 328 ft (100 m) 820 ft (250 m) Surface Hardening/Soil compaction Trails (e.g., human, ungulates) 6 m20ft ) 2x crown diameter Roads/Utility Corridors, Buildings/Structures 328 ft (100 m) 820 ft (250 m) Definitions (Wagner el al. 1999) Crown: The leafy top of a tree. Herb: A plant, either annual, biennial, or perennial, with the non -woody stems dying back to the ground at the end of the growing season. s Ms. Kim Narel 7 Shrub: A perennial woody plant with usually several to numerous primary stems arising from or relatively near the ground. Tree: A woody perennial that usually has a single trunk Biosecurity and Invasive Species We are attaching our list of Biosecurity Protocols to prevent the introduction and spread of harmful invasive species on the island of Hawaii. We encourage you to incorporate the relevant measures into your project description and all contracts for the construction:maintenance of the project. If this potential project should receive federal funding, federal permits, or any federal authorization, it will require a Section 7 consultation with the Service. The Service only eonduci Section 7 consultations with the federal action agency or their designated representative. Thank you for participating with us in the protection of our endangered species. If you have any further questions or concerns regarding this consultation, please contact Eldridge Naboa, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 808-933-6964, e-mail: eldridge naboatt,fws.gov. When referring to this project, please include this reference numbers: 91EPIFOO-2010SL -9194. Since Michelle Bogardus Island Team Manager Maui Nui and Hawaii Island Attachments: Biosecurity Protocols — Hawaii Island Ms. Kim Narel BIOSECURTY PROTOCOL - HAWAII ISLAND (JULY 2018) The following biosecurity protocol (based on National Park Service, State of Hawaii, U.S. Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Geological Survey, and the DOI Office of Native Hawaiian Relations guidance) should be followed when operating on Hawaii Island to prevent the introduction of harmful invasive species including frogs, ants, weeds, and fungi into local natural areas (e.g., Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge, State of Hawaii Natural Areas") and areas with native habitat (habitat that is primarily composed of native vegetation), other islands in Hawaiian archipelago, or the U.S. mainland. The protocol also includes suggestions for keeping field staff safe from certain invasive species. 1. All work vehicles, machinery, and equipment should be cleaned, inspected by its user, and found free of mud, dirt, debris and invasive species prior to entry into the natural areas or native habitat. a. Vehicles, machinery, and equipment must be thoroughly pressure washed in a designated cleaning area and visibly free of mud, dirt, plant debris, insects, frogs (including frog eggs) and other vertebrate species such as rats, mice and non -vegetative debris. A hot water wash is preferred. Areas of particular concern include bumpers, grills, hood compartments, areas under the battery, wheel wells, undercarriage, cabs, and truck beds (truck beds with accumulated material (intentionally placed or fallen from trees) are prime sites for hitchhikers). b. The interior and exterior of vehicles, machinery, and equipment must be free of rubbish and food. The interiors of vehicles and the cabs of machinery must be vacuumed clean. Floor mats shall be sanitized with a solution of >70% isopropyl alcohol or a freshly mixed 10% bleach solution. 8 c. Any machinery, vehicles, equipment, or other supplies found to be infested with ants (or other invasive species) must not enter natural areas or native habitat. Treatment is the responsibility of the equipment or vehicle owner and operator. 2. Little Fire Ants - All work vehicles, machinery, and equipment should be inspected for invasive ants prior to entering the natural areas or native habitat. a. A visual inspection for little fire ants should be conducted prior to entry into natural areas or native habitat. b. Hygiene is paramount but even the cleanest vehicle can pick up a little fire ant. Place MaxForce Complete Brand Granular Insect Bait (1.0% Hydramethylnon; http://Iittlefireants.com/Maxforce%20Complete.pd0 into refillable tamper resistant bait stations. An example of a commercially available refillable tamper resistant bait station is the Ant Cate Pro aittos::/www.anteate.com:). Place a bait station (or stations) in vehicle. Note larger vehicles, such as trucks, may require multiple stations. Monitor bait stations frequently (every week at a minimum) and replace bait as needed. If the station does not have a sticker to identify the contents, apply a sticker listing contents to the station. c. Any machinery, vehicles, equipment, or other supplies found to be infested with ants (or other invasive species) must not enter natural areas or native habitat until it is sanitized and re -tested following a resting period. Infested vehicles must be sanitized following recommendations by the Hawaii Ant Lab (http://www.littlefireants.com/) or other ant control expert and in accordance Ms. Kim Narel 9 with all State and Federal laws. Treatment is the responsibility of the equipment or vehicle owner. d. Gravel, building materials, or other equipment such as portable buildings should be baited using MaxForce Complete Brand Granular insect Bait (1.0% Hydramethylnon; http:/Aittlefireants.com/Maxforce%20Complete.pdf) or AmdroPro (0.73% Hydramethylnon; http://Iittlefireants.com/Amdro%20Pro.pdf) following label guidance. e. Storage areas that hold field tools, especially tents, tarps, and clothing should be baited using MaxForce Complete Brand Granular Insect Bait (1.0% Hydramethylnon; http://Iittlefireants.com/Maxforce%20Comptete.pdf) or AmdroPro (0.73% Hydramethylnon; http.//littlefireants.com/Amdro%20Pro.pdf) following label guidance. 3. Base yards and staging areas inside and outside areas must be kept free of invasive species. a. Base yards and staging areas should be inspected at least weekly for invasive species and any found invasive removed immediately. Pay particular attention to where vehicles are parked overnight, keeping areas within 10 -meters of vehicles free of debris. Parking on pavement and not under trees, while not always practical is best. b. Project vehicles or equipment stored outside of a base yard or staging area, such as a private residence, should be kept in a pest free area. 4. All cutting tools must be sanitized to prevent the Rapid Ohia Death (ROD) fungus. a. Avoid wounding ohia trees and roots with mowers, chainsaws, weed eaters, and other tools. Cut only the minimum amount of trees and branches as approved for the project. b. All cutting tools, including machetes, chainsaws, and toppers must be sanitized to remove visible dirt and other contaminants prior to entry into natural areas or areas with native habitat, and when moving to a new project area within the native habitat area. Tools may be sanitized using a solution of>70% isopropyl alcohol or a freshly mixed 10% bleach solution. One minute after sanitizing, you may apply an oil based lubricant to chainsaw chains or other metallic parts to prevent corrosion. c. Only dedicated tools and chainsaws should be used to sample known or suspected ROD infected trees. d. Vehicles, machinery, and equipment must be cleaned as described in (1) above. 5. Imported firewood, logs, and ohia parts: a. Ohia firewood, ohia logs, and ohia parts should not be transported. 6. For individuals working in the field: a. Before going into the field, visually inspect and clean your clothes, boots, pack, radio harness, tools and other personal gear and equipment, for seeds, soil, plant parts, insects, and other debris. A small brush is handy for cleaning boots, equipment and gear. Soles of shoes should be sanitized using a solution of >70% isopropyl alcohol or a freshly mixed 10% bleach solution. Ms. Kim Narel 10 b. Immediately before leaving the field, visually inspect and clean your clothes, boots, pack, radio harness, tools, and other personnel gear and equipment, for seeds, soil, plant parts, insects, and other debris. Soles of shoes should be sanitized using a solution of>70% isopropyl alcohol or a freshly mixed 10% bleach solution. c. Little fire ants nest in trees. if you are under a tree and that tree is bumped or somehow stressed, the threat response of the ants is to fall from the leaves and sting the person under the tree. If you are subject to an ant attack, do not panic. The ants are extremely small but their stings are painful so make sure you remove all ants from your body and clothing. The stings cause inch long welts that are itchy and painful, and can last for weeks. Treat stings as you would other insect stings. In some persons stings can produce life threatening reactions. Stocking antihistamine in the first aid kit is a reasonable precaution. d. Rat Lungworm disease is caused by a parasite that can infect humans who consume raw or undercooked infected snails or slugs or consume raw produce that contains a small infected snail or slug. Infection is rare but can be serious. Symptoms can include severe headache, neck stiffness, low grade fever, nausea, and vomiting anywhere from 1-6 weeks after exposure. The disease is not spread person to person. Anyone who handles snails or slugs should wear gloves and/or wash hands. Eating unwashed produce is discouraged. Literature cited Wagner, W.L., Sohmer, S., and D.R. Herbst. 1999. Manual of the flowering plants of Hawaii, revised edition. Honolulu, Hawaii. University of Hawaii and Bishop Museum Press. 1,919 pp. APPENDIX C Photographs C Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii Figure 1. Mixed `ohi`a/non-native forest vegetation type in the survey area. C-1 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii Figure 2. Figure 3. Mixed `ohi`a/non-native forest vegetaiton type in the survey area. C-2 Threatened and Endangered Species Report for the AT&T Mobility LLC Project in Leilani Estates, Puna, Island and County of Hawaii Figure 3. Ruderal and bare ground/road vegetation type in the foreground with mixed `ohi`a/non-native forest vegetation type in the background of the survey area. C-3 APPENDIX D Resumes SWCA Resume JAMES BREEDEN, B.S., BIOLOGIST Mr. Breeden is a biologist with more than 19 years of specialized experience in biological research and natural resource management with a variety of agencies, including nongovernmental organizations and federal and state agencies. He has an extensive background in conducting captures, surveys, and monitoring for forest birds, shorebirds, waterfowl, and seabirds in the Pacific Islands (e.g., Hawai'i, Laysan Island, Midway Atoll, Palmyra Atoll, Saipan, and Tinian), as well as experience with environmental compliance and planning. Throughout his career, Mr. Breeden has overseen management of hundreds of bird species, endangered species, breeding programs, conservation programs, and numerous staff. He has played an integral role in building and maintaining relationships with federal and state agencies, national and intemational scientists, public organizations, and other interest groups. He has also provided peer review of scientific and technical papers for journals and government agencies. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 19 EXPERTISE Surveying for rare and endangered Hawaiian plant species Invasive species control and eradication Hawai'i forest bird surveys (variable circular plot counts) Shorebird and seabird surveys Spot mapping Invertebrate sampling Population monitoring Predator control Translocation of threatened and endangered waterfowl and passerines Trapping and banding passerines, waterfowl, shorebirds, seabirds, and raptors (mist nets, snares, bal-chatri, bow net, net gun, spot lighting, and box traps) EDUCATION B.S., Wildlife and Fisheries Science; Tennessee Tech University, Cookeville; 2000 TRAINING DOI Motorboat Operator Certification Course, Department of Interior; 2006 CPR, American Red Cross; 2018 Qualified Airport Biologist SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Hawaiian Acres Natural Resource Surveys; Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.; Pahoa, Hawaii County, Hawai'i. Bureau Veritas North America, Inc. installed a 200 -foot self-support tower at the H13 Hawaiian Acres site located on Moho Road. The company requested that SWCA conduct surveys for the endangered Hawaiian hawk and prepare a biological report of findings and recommendations for minimizing impact. The Hawaiian hawk surveys were visual and auditory and focused on the areas where the birds are likely to forage and nest. Additionally, trees were examined for nesting areas and marked if necessary. Role: Biologist. Performed survey and report writing. Midway Atoll Duck Mitigation Implementation; Hawai'i Island Conservation; Midway Atoll. SWCA led Laysan duck mitigation pre -implementation of a mouse eradication project. This included the design and implementation of all the mitigation efforts. Mr. Breeden led a team of biologists in the design of a trapping system that allowed for the capture of up to 50 ducks at one time; trained the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) staff on how to trap ducks; designed the aviary layout; designed capture and acclimation boxes; and developed strategies on how to condition ducks to captivity. Role: Wildlife Biologist. Led all mitigation efforts and fieldwork. Lanai Airport Wildlife Hazardous Assessment (WHA); Hawai'i Department of Transportation; Lana`i City, Maui County, Hawaii. SWCA was contracted by Hawai'i Department of Transportation (HDOT) Airports Division to conduct wildlife hazard assessment surveys at Lanai Airport. Surveys occur two times a month over a 1 -year period. SWCA is documenting the presence of wildlife species and their numbers, locations, movements, and daily and seasonal occurrences in and around the airport, which pose a threat to human safety and can cause substantial damage to aircraft. SWCA is also identifying wildlife attractants and habitat types within the survey area. Role: Wildlife Biologist. Conducts monthly surveys, data analysis, and report preparation. Hawai'i Kanaio Game Management Area; Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW); Maui County, Hawaii. SWCA was hired to complete a strategic management plan, Environmental Assessment (EA), and related regulatory compliance documents for the Kanaio Game Management Area GMA). The proposed GMA also required biological assessment and an inventory of cultural sites, as well as mitigation recommendations. Role: Wildlife Biologist. Conducted biological survey and analysis to determine potential impacts to endangered species. Page 11 SWCA Resume Ahukini Landfill Biological and Cultural Surveys; Belt Collins Hawaii, LLC; Kaua'i County, Hawaii. Belt Collins invited SWCA to support their work on the stabilization of the retired Ahukini Landfill near Lihue Airport, Kauai. HDOT is responsible for stabilizing a coastal slope within the Ahukini Landfill in order to prevent refuse exfoliating off the face of the dump from contaminating coastal waters. The biological survey consisted of an in-depth literature review, flora and fauna survey, and documenting and mapping all wedge-tailed sheerwater (Puffinus pacificus) burrows in the project area, as well as preparing a report describing all survey findings with potential impacts to the flora and fauna. Role: Wildlife Biologist. Performed surveys of fauna, including mapping all wedge-tailed shearwater burrows in the area. Kealakekua Bay Flora and Fauna Surveys; Confidential Client; Hawaii County, Hawaii. SWCA was invited to conduct a flora, fauna, and marine biological resource assessment at Kealakekua Bay State Historical Park, South Kona, Hawaii Island. SWCA botanists conducted pedestrian and kayak botanical surveys and a wildlife survey recording all avifauna, mammals, and terrestrial reptiles, amphibians, and invertebrates. Snorkeling and diving surveys were conducted during the marine survey part of the project. All plant and animal species were documented in the biological report listing the presence or likely occurrence of any threatened, endangered, or candidate species, including any unlisted species of concem. Role: Wildlife Biologist. Produced a report with finding that identified presence of bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, and invertebrate macrofauna including any state or federally listed candidate, threatened, or endangered species, species of concern and/or rare species and evaluated potential impacts to them and their habitat. Honua'ula HCP Phase III; Honua'ula Partners, LLC; Maui County, Hawaii. Assisting this residential community development firm, SWCA performed and managed analyses for the proposed action and different altematives relating to the cumulative effects on flora and fauna, climate, topography, geology, soils, water resources, natural hazards, air quality, noise, visual resources, land use, socioeconomic characteristics, infrastructure and utilities, archaeologicaUhistoric resources, public services and facilities, and hazardous substances and materials. Because of the presence of federally listed species, SWCA developed a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), EA, and associated mitigation plans. Role: Wildlife Biologist. Contributed to the preparation of an HCP as pad of an application for an incidental Take Permit issued under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The HCP identified species that could be impacted by the project, identified measures to minimize or mitigate impacts to these species and their habitats, and identified measures that contribute to the conservation and recovery of the species. Biological Surveys for Molokai Water Systems Improvements; PBR Hawai'i; Maui County, Hawai'i. SWCA performed biological surveys on the island of Molokai to determine if any environmental impacts will result from the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands proposed update to the aging water system. SWCA identified and recorded flora and fauna and mapped any threatened or endangered species. Role: Biologist. Conducted pedestrian and variable circular plot -count surveys to identify and document the relative abundance of bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile, and invertebrate macrofauna, including any threatened and endangered species or species of concern. Conducted literature review of existing natural resources within the project site. Prepared a report describing the fauna in the project site. East Maui Water Lease Environmental Impact Study Biological Support; Wilson Okamoto Corporation; Maui County, Hawai'i. SWCA assisted in the biological sections of the Environmental Impact Statement for the Ease Maui Water Lease. The biological surveys were split into five tasks including communication and coordination with client, an extensive literature review, a technical report, and a computer-based vegetation map prior to the fieldwork. SWCA biologists and botanists performed vehicle and pedestrian surveys of the license area, as well as an overflight helicopter assessment. Role: Wildlife Biologist. Performed biological survey and wrote fauna section in the final report. Piilani Highway Emergency Repairs, Maui; AECOM, Inc.; Maui County, Hawai'i. SWCA conducted a terrestrial flora and fauna biological resources survey of a section of Piilani Highway that was destroyed in a landslide. SWCA conducted a one -day pedestrian survey of a 0.65 - acre area in the Nuanualoa Gulch within the Maui County right-of-way near mile marker 37. Role: Biologist. Conducted the fauna survey, created the outline for the report and wrote the fauna section. Pakini Nui Wind Farm Year 1 Surveys and Monitoring; Confidential Client; Hawaii County, Hawaii. Surveyed for bats and avian species at the wind farm, and searcher efficiency and carcass retention trials for fatality monitoring for 1 year. Role: Biologist. Conducted searcher efficiency searches, distributed searcher efficiency decoys, bat detector maintenance, downed wildlife training, and carcass identification. Waikoloa Reservoir Tree Removal; Kleinfelder; Hawai'i County, Hawai'i. SWCA conducted biological and cultural resources surveys on behalf of Kleinfelder at Waikoloa Reservoir No. 1 as part of the County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply plan to perform repairs to the Waikoloa Reservoir No. 1. SWCA conducted a biological survey for ESA species and their habitat; prepared a tree removal plan, including the number of trees to be removed; and provided guidelines for appropriate times for conducting tree removal and mitigation measures to minimize impacts to species protected by the ESA. Role: Biologist. Survey and report writing. Page I2 SWCA Resume ALEX LAU, M.S., BOTANIST Mr. Lau works in the SWCA Honolulu office as a Botanist and Environmental Specialist, working on program development, field surveys, and reporting, particularly involving invasive species. He has worked as a botanist and program co -coordinator, specializing in planning and implementing multifaceted programs dedicated to the early detection of invasive plants. He has extensive plant identification skills with both the native flora of Hawaii and non- native plants, which often occur in California and the Southwest. He regularly networks with various stakeholders and interest groups, including natural resource management agencies, invasive species scientists, government agencies, and the green industry, to address invasive plants and broader biosecurity issues in Hawaii. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 14 EXPERTISE Program planning and implementation Invasive species ecology and management Natural resource management Plant ecology Plant taxonomy and identification Herbarium protocols Biosecurity issues EDUCATION M.S., Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Management; University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawai'i; 2014 B.S., Biology and Ecology; Evergreen State College, Olympia, Washington; 2004 AWARDS HONORS Hau'oli Mau Loa Foundation Graduate Fellowship MEMBERSHIPS Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum, Affiliate SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE (* denotes project experience prior to SWCA) Statewide Noxious Invasive Pest Program (SNIPP); Hawaii Department of Transportation; Honolulu, Honolulu County, Hawaii. The objective of the project is to mitigate the effects of invasive species along state roads through installation of preventive measures, early detection, control and management, and restoration activities. Role: Botanist/ Environmental Specialist. Project development, planning, and implementation, contributing to program procedures to meet scientific and regulatory standards. Kenai Habitat Conservation Plan Implementation; AKC Leasing Corporation; Honolulu County, Hawaii. SWCA was contracted to implement the mitigation measures for a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) of Kenai Industrial Park. Role: Botanist, Environmental Specialist. Conducts horticultural (qualitative) and biological (quantitative) monitoring for the duration of the implementation of the habitat conservation plan for the incidental take of the round -leaved chaff flower. Hawai`i Kanaio Game Management Area; Department of Land and Natural Resources DLNR) Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW); Maui County, Hawai'i. The Hawaii DOFAW asked SWCA to complete a strategic management plan, Environmental Assessment EA), and related regulatory compliance documents for the Kanaio Game Management Area GMA). The Kanaio region of southem Maui is one of the last remaining stretches of lowland dry forest left in Hawai'i. The proposed GMA also requires Biological Assessments (BAs) and an inventory of cultural sites, as well as mitigation recommendations. Role: Botanist. Conducted botanical surveys and assisted with literature research and report writing. Hawai'i Invasive Species Council Bishop Museum Plant Identification Support; Bishop Museum; Honolulu County, Hawaii. SWCA is assisting the Bishop Museum in forming a statewide early detection support program to better inform the Invasive Species Committees ISCs), as well as federal, state, and private land managers throughout Hawaii. SWCA is facilitating herbarium -quality identifications, accurately describing species establishment and distribution, and providing life history and weed control information. Role: Botanist. Specimen identification, data management, and invasive species research. Piilani Highway Emergency Repairs; AECOM, Inc.; Maui County, Hawai'i. SWCA conducted a terrestrial flora and fauna biological resources survey of a section of Piilani Highway that was destroyed in a landslide. SWCA conducted a 1 -day pedestrian survey of a 0.65 -acre area in the Nuanualoa Gulch within the Maui County right-of-way near mile marker 37. Role: Botanist. Conducted terrestrial fauna surveys to record presence of any threatened, endangered, proposed, and candidate species. Ahukini Landfill Restoration Permitting Support (BCH); Belt Collins Hawaii, LLC; Lihue, Kauai County, Hawaii. Belt Collins Hawaii requested SWCA conduct an archaeological literature review and conduct a field inspection of the former Ahukini Landfill on the east coast of Page ' 1 SWCA Resume the island of Kauai. SWCA was also tasked with preparing a Cultural Impact Assessment for the area. Role: Environmental Specialist. Conducted botanical survey and assisted with report writing. Barbers Point Utilities Renovation NEPA Support; AECOM, Inc.; Honolulu, Honolulu City and County, Hawaii. AECOM invited SWCA to support National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Endangered Species Act documentation of the United States Coast Guard's assessment of construction of a new electrical line along the Coral Sea Road alignment on Oahu. SWCA prepared the biological resource subsections of the EA, and prepared a BA. Role: Environmental Specialist. Conducted botanical survey and assisted with report writing. Kahului Airport (OGG) Runway Reconstruction Environmental Assessment; RS&H, Inc.; Kahului, Maui County, Hawai'i. SWCA is teaming with RS&H to complete an EA compliant with NEPA and the Hawai'i Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; also known as Hawaii Revised Statutes [HRS] Chapter 343) for the Kahului Airport (OGG) Runway Improvement project. SWCA has been assigned the following resource sections: biological resources; coastal resources; historic, architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources; and water resources. SWCA is also responsible for incorporating HEPA into the NEPA process. Role: Environmental Specialist. Conducted botanical survey and assisted with report writing. Keaau Composting Facility Flora and Fauna Survey; SSFM International, Inc.; Keaau, Hawaii County, Hawaii. SSFM International invited SWCA to support natural resource surveys for a proposed compost facility in Keaau, Hawaii. Prior to the site assessment, SWCA conducted a comprehensive literature review on previous natural resources surveys and descriptions of terrestrial resources present in the vicinity of the project area. A two -person team of SWCA biologists performed a pedestrian survey to document the potential for state and federally listed endangered species to occur in the project area. Role: Environmental Specialist. Conducted a botanical survey and wrote botanical section of the report. KIUC Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Natural and Cultural Services; Joule Group, LLC; Kauai County, Hawaii. Joule Group invited SWCA to provide natural resources support by conducting flora and fauna surveys for compliance with HRS Chapter 343 for the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative's (KIUC) Pu'u Opae Water Project. The project consisted of upgrades to existing and construction of new infrastructure to support pumped water storage and load shifting capability, net generation, and irrigation delivery. Role: Environmental Specialist. Conducted background research on species at project site, plant identiications, and assisted with report preparation. Punaluu Larval Drift Survey and Supplemental Services; Trustees of the Estate of Bernice Pauahi Bishop dba Kamehameha Schools; Honolulu, Multiple Counties, Hawaii. SWCA completed various stream surveys for the Kamehameha Schools throughout Oahu, Kauai, and Hawaii Island. Larval drift netting, a technique developed by Danielle Lindstrom (1998a, 1998b) gives a quantitative estimate of the production of potential new `o'opu recruits from a stream and can determine the presence of species that are rare and potentially undetected as adults. SWCA was asked to provide an '0'opu Biology and Driftnet Sample Training Course to educate students on the essentials of Hawaiian stream biology and introduce them to the method of larval drift netting. The goal of this training course was to provide educational outreach to a number of students on Hawaiian stream biology, train students in the larval driftnetting methodology, and lab analysis for larval 'o'opu, and to collect data to reinforce the data gathered under the Kamehameha Schools Larval Drift Sampling study from 2014 to present. Role: Environmental Specialist. Conducted analysis of larval drift net samples, and identifications of larval 'o'opu. Lawai Solar and Storage; CH2M Hill, Inc.; Kauai County, Hawaii. SWCA conducted a biological resource assessment, including any necessary background research and a detailed survey (including botanical, avian, and mammalian species) of the project area. The results of the survey were used in land use and zoning permit applications. Role: Environmental Specialist. Conducted wetland delineation survey work and assisted with report writing. United States Coast Guard Stormwater Sampling Analysis; United States Coast Guard; Honolulu, Honolulu City and County, Hawai'i. SWCA provided drain vault cleaning, conducted outfall sampling and analysis, and generated a monitoring report for eight stormwater drains at the U.S. Coast Guard Base in Honolulu, Hawaii, in compliance with the 2018 Annual Stormwater Evaluation Plan. Role: Environmental Specialist. Assisted with stormwater collection and drain vault cleaning. 0`ahu Early Detection program; Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum; Honolulu, Hawaii. The Oahu Early Detection (OED) program connects scientific, herbarium -based research to invasive plant management by working with public agencies and private citizens to identify, document, and make recommendations about introduced and potentially invasive plant species. Role: Early Detection Botanist. Developed, implemented, maintained, and grew program. Mastered the identification and documentation of the vascular flora of Hawaii. Page 12 SWCA Resume JULIE GAERTNER, IMS., GIS ANALYST / ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 16 EXPERTISE ESRI ArcMap and ArcPro, online AGOL) Collector web maps and field applications GPS data collection - Collector App, Survey 123, Samsung tablets, Trimble, Garmin, Juniper geodes ENVI & Ecognition remote sensing Geospatial statistics and modeling Land cover and vegetation mapping Invasive species management Water quality data collection and analysis Hydrology mapping EDUCATION M.S., Tropical Conservation Biology & Environmental Science; University of Hawaii at Hilo; 2013 B.S., Environmental Science & Resource Management. Minor: Streamside Studies; University of Washington, School of Forest Resources; 2009 A.S., Environmental Science & Water Studies; NW Michigan College, Traverse City, Michigan; 2006 TRAINING Helicopter Safety Training Certification, Research Corporation of the University of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources; 2012 Low Impact Development (LID) Certification, UW College of Engineering; 2009 First Aid & CPR Training Certification 2018 Julie Gaertner is an environmental scientist specializing in remote sensing, geospatial analysis and water resource management for SWCA's Honolulu, HI and Pasadena, CA offices. Her work includes geographical information systems (GIS) cartography and database management, horticulture, coordinator for the Hawaii Department of Transportation's Statewide Noxious Invasive Pest Program (SNIPP), mapping invasive species, and hazard mitigation mapping throughout the Hawaiian Islands. She has more than 15 years of experience in environmental consulting services and has consulted with federal, state, private and non-profit agencies in Hawaii. SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Statewide Noxious Invasive Pest Program (SNIPP); Hawai'i Department of Transportation; Honolulu, Honolulu County, Hawaii. The objective of the project is to mitigate the effects of invasive species along state roads through installation of preventive measures, early detection, control and management, and restoration activities. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. Coordinator of the Highway Manual for Sustainable Landscape Maintenance (HMSLM) and Maintenance Professional Track Development (MPTD) trainings, SNIPP GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordination and data collection, cartography, invasive species web maps and applications. Hawai'i Kanaio Game Management Area; Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW); Maui County, Hawai'i. The Hawai'i DOFAW asked SWCA to complete a strategic management plan, Environmental Assessment (EA), and related regulatory compliance documents for the Kanaio Game Management Area (GMA). The Kanaio region of southern Maui is one of the last remaining stretches of lowland dry forest left in Hawaii. The proposed GMA also requires Biological Assessments (BAs) and an inventory of cultural sites, as well as mitigation recommendations. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and data collection, web maps, and cartography. East Maui Water Lease Environmental Impact Study Biological Support; Wilson Okamoto Corporation; Maui County, Hawaii. Wilson Okatomo Corporation invited SWCA to support the biological sections of the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the East Maui Water Lease. SWCA conducted a computer-based vegetation mapping effort to quantify existing vegetation coverage, performed flora and fauna field surveys, and drafted a biological resources report, including a literature research on the natural history of the mosquito -borne impacts to native birds. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and helicopter survey data collection, web maps, and cartography. Keauhou Beach Hotel Demolition Marine Surveys; Confidential Client; Kailua Kona, Hawaii County, Hawaii. CONFIDENTIAL Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and data collection, web maps, and cartography. Page 11 SWCA Resume Pakini Nui Fatality Searches; Tawhiri Power LLC; Naalehu, Hawaii County, Hawaii. Tawhiri Power, LLC, invited SWCA to assist in weekly biological monitoring services for a 21 -MW wind farm with 14 turbines on the Island of Hawai'i. SWCA biologists have implemented systematic searches (both human- and canine -led) for downed wildlife at at turbines to assess impacts of the wind farm to Hawaiian petrel, neve, and Hawaiian hoary bat. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and data collection, web maps, and cartography. Pakini Nui Habitat Conservation Plan; Tawhiri Power LLC; Hawaii County, Hawaii. SWCA drafted federal HCP development and a major state HCP amendment to increase permitted take for one species and add an additional covered species for an operational wind farm. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase management and cartography. KIUC Hydroelectric Pumped Storage Natural and Cultural Services; Joule Group, LLC; Kauai County, Hawaii. Joule Group invited SWCA to provide natural resources support by conducting flora and fauna surveys for compliance with HRS Chapter 343 for the Kauai Island Utility Cooperative's (KIUC) Pu'u Opae Water Project. The project consisted of upgrades to existing and construction of new infrastructure to support pumped water storage and load shifting capability, net generation, and irrigation delivery. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and data collection, web maps, and cartography. Kahului Airport (OGG) Runway Reconstruction Environmental Assessment; RS&H, Inc.; Kahului, Maui County, Hawai'i. SWCA is teaming with RS&H to complete an EA compliant with NEPA and the Hawaii Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; also known as Hawaii Revised Statutes [HRS] Chapter 343) for the Kahului Airport (OGG) Runway Improvement project. SWCA has been assigned the following resource sections: biological resources; coastal resources; historic, architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources; and water resources. SWCA is also responsible for incorporating HEPA into the NEPA process. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and data collection, web maps, and cartography. Ahihi-Kinau Natural Area Reserve Archaeological Services; State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR); Maui County, Hawaii. SWCA provided the State of Hawai'i Department of Land and Natural Resources Division of Forestry and Wildlife DOFAW), Native Ecosystem Protection and Management Section, with cultural resources consulting services in support of a proposed nonnative vegetation removal project within its `Ahihi-Kina'u Natural Area Reserve. The project area, totaling approximately 14 acres, is located on the southwest coast of Maui adjacent to `Ahihi Bay. SWCA conducted an archaeological inventory -level survey systematically documenting the historic properties present within the project area. The findings of this inventory survey report will assist the DOFAW in completing historic preservation review for the project. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and data collection, web maps, and cartography. Ahukini Landfill Restoration Permitting Support (BCH); Belt Collins Hawaii, LLC; Lihue, Kauai County, Hawaii. Bet Collins Hawaii requested SWCA to conduct an archaeological literature review and conduct a field inspection of the former Ahukini Landfill on the east coast of the island of Kauai. SWCA was also tasked with preparing a Cultural Impact Assessment for the area. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and data collection, web maps, and cartography. County of San Mateo EIR for Canyon Lane Roadway Improvements; County of San Mateo; Redwood City, San Mateo County, California. SWCA is preparing an EIR and technical background studies for the project for the improvement of Canyon Lane. Project includes development of a single-family residence on one parcel, and future development of residences on eleven parcels. The project also involves the construction of new utilities, including a waterline and an underground distribution line. Role: GIS Analyst. GIS geodatabase management and cartography. Lanai Airport Wildlife Hazardous Assessment; Hawaii Department of Transportation; Lanai City, Maui County, Hawaii. SWCA is documenting the presence of wildlife species and their numbers, locations, movements, and daily and seasonal occurrences in and around the Lanai Airport. SWCA is also identifying wildlife attractants and habitat types in the survey area. SWCA will provide management recommendation actions for reducing aircraft strikes and wildlife attractants. Role: GIS Analyst and Environmental Specialist. GIS geodatabase analysis and management, field survey coordinator and data collection, web maps, and cartography. Page 1 2 SWCA Resume AMANDA EHRENKRANTZ, B.A., SECTION 7 SPECIALIST/ WILDLIFE ECOLOGIST/ PROJECT MANAGER Ms. Ehrenkrantz is a wildlife ecologist with experience conducting a wide range of field protocols. as well as writing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)- and Endangered Species Act (ESA) -compliant documents and technical reports. She has authored Biological Assessments (BAs) and Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) for a range of project types and covered activities. In the field, she is proficient at leading and conducting habitat assessments and surveys for bats, big game, small mammals, prairie dogs, and raptors, including threatened, endangered, and sensitive wildlife species. Ms. Ehrenkrantz has worked on a range of project types, including energy development wind, solar, coal, oil. and gas), transmission, large- and small-scale housing development, airports, and roads. She has worked extensively in Hawai'i, California, Oregon, Alaska, Texas, and the Intermountain West (Utah, Wyoming, Idaho, Nevada, and Arizona). She is proficient at conducting aerial surveys from a helicopter for raptor nest location and activity, greater sage -grouse lek location, and big -game counts. YEARS OF EXPERIENCE 18 EXPERTISE Endangered Species Act compliance National Environmental Policy Act compliance Pre- and post -construction wildlife monitoring for wind energy projects Bat capture and acoustic survey techniques Threatened, endangered. and sensitive species surveys and inventories Energy development, land development, airport expansion and construction, and roads Aerial surveys for raptors, greater sage - grouse, and big game EDUCATION B.A. cum laude. Environmental Science, Alaska Pacific University, Anchorage; 2000 TRAINING Comprehensive NEPA, SWCA Environmental Consultants: 2007 Bat Conservation and Management, Bat Conservation International; 2010 AnaBat Survey and Equipment Training. Northtronics USA; 2008 SELECTED PROJECT EXPERIENCE Pakini Nui Fatality Searches; Tawhiri Power LLC; Naalehu, Hawaii County, Hawaii. Tawhiri Power, LLC, invited SWCA to assist in weekly biological monitoring services for a 21 - megawatt wind farm with 14 turbines on the Island of Hawaii. SWCA biologists have implemented systematic searches (both human- and canine -led) for downed wildlife at all turbines to assess impacts of the wind farm to Hawaiian petrel, nene, and Hawaiian hoary bat. Role: Project Manager. Client and agency coordination and reporting. Pakini Nui Habitat Conservation Plan; Tawhiri Power LLC; Hawaii County, Hawai'i. SWCA drafted federal HCP development and a major state HCP amendment to increase permitted take for one species and add an additional covered species for an operational wind farm. Role: Environmental Specialist. Assisted with the development of HCP amendment, including resource analysis. sensitive species subject matter expertise. and response to comments from client. KWP II Wind Farm Habitat Conservation Plan Amendment; Maui County, Hawai'i. SWCA prepared an HCP amendment to increase requested nene and Hawaiian hoary bat take. SWCA prepared a state Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) to analyze impacts of amendment approval. Role: Project Manager. Assisted with the development of HCP amendment, including resource analysis, sensitive species subject matter expertise, and response to comments from client and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USFWS). Oversaw SETS submittal. Kawailoa Wind Farm HCP Amendment Environmental Assessment and Environmental Impact Statement; Honolulu County, Hawaii. Role: Project Manager. Assisted with the development of HCP amendment, Environmental Assessment (EA) and EIS: provided resource analysis. sensitive species subject matter expertise. and responded to comments from client and USFWS: provided quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) review. Lalamilo Wind Farm Habitat Conservation Plan; Lalamilo Wind Farm, LLC.; Hawaii County, Hawaii. SWCA prepared an HCP for the incidental take of two endangered species. Role: Environmental Specialist. Assisted with the development of HCP, including esource analysis, sensitive species subject matter expertise. and response to comments from client and USFWS. Page 1 1 SWCA Resume Ahukini Landfill Restoration Permitting Support; Belt Collins Hawaii, LLC; Lihue, Kauai County, Hawaii. Belt Collins requested SWCA conduct an archaeological literature review and conduct a field inspection of the former Ahukini Landfill on the east coast of the island of Kauai. SWCA was also tasked with preparing a Cultural Impact Assessment for the area. Role: Project Manager. Managed internal and client project communication and coordination. Provided QA/QC for final report and assisted with addressing client comments. Aweoweo Drainage Project; Confidential Client; Waialua, Honolulu County, Hawaii. Flora, fauna, and marine surveys were conducted at Aweoweo Beach Park and intertidal waters in support of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Permit Application for the Aweoweo Street drainage repair work in Waialua, O'ahu, for the EA for the modification of a stormwater outfall pipe. Role: Project Manager. Barbers Point Utilities Renovation NEPA Support; AECOM, Inc.; Honolulu, Honolulu City and County, Hawai'i. SWCA conducted flora and fauna field surveys in support of an EA for an underground transmission line. Role: Project Manager. Managed internal, client, and agency communication. Provided expertise on impacts analysis and finalized technical memorandum based on the field survey team's findings. Addressed client comments. Hawaii Kanaio Game Management Area; Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) Division of Forestry and Wildlife DOFAW); Maui County, Hawaii. The Hawai'i DOFAW asked SWCA to complete a strategic management plan, EA, and related regulatory compliance documents for the Kanaio Game Management Area (GMA). The GMA also required an inventory of cultural sites, as well as mitigation recommendations. Role: Senior Section 7 Biologist. Kahului Airport (OGG) Runway Reconstruction Environmental Assessment; RS&H, Inc.; Kahului, Maui County, Hawai'i. SWCA teamed with RS&H to complete an EA compliant with NEPA and the Hawai'i Environmental Policy Act (HEPA; also known as Hawaii Revised Statutes HRS] Chapter 343) for the Kahului Airport (OGG) Runway Improvement project. SWCA has been assigned the following resource sections: biological resources; coastal resources; historic, architectural, archaeological, and cultural resources; and water resources. SWCA is also responsible for incorporating HEPA into the NEPA process. Role: Project Manager. Kilauea Bicycle and Pedestrian Access Alternatives Environmental Assessment; Atkins; Kauai County, Hawaii. SWCA was contracted by Atkins to assist the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Central Federal Lands Division (CFLHD) with planning for construction of a pedestrian and bike path between Kilauea Town and the Kilauea Point Lighthouse on the Island of Kauai, Hawaii. SWCA was tasked with finalizing a cultural resource consultation, environmental compliance monitoring and wetland permitting, and preparation of a BA. The cultural resource consultation consists of an archaeological inventory of the direct area of potential effects (APE), and documenting and evaluating historic properties within the indirect APE for Hawai'i Register of Historic Places (HRHP) and National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility. As part of the environmental compliance, SWCA conducted threatened and endangered species research and conducted flora and fauna surveys in the project area. SWCA has conducted consultations with the State Historic Preservation Office, USFWS, DOFAW, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers throughout the life of the project. Role: Project Manager. Project management and client/staffcoordination. Provides QA/QC for project deliverables. Confidential Wind Habitat Conservation Plan; Confidential Client; Hawaii. SWCA is providing support for an application for an ESA Section 10(a)(1)(B) Incidental Take Permit (ITP) and HRS195D Incidental Take License (ITL) in support of a wind energy development project on the Island of Hawai'i. Role: Project Manager. Coordinates and manages the HCP development process; provides ESA subject matter expertise, provides comments to clients and USFWS. Section 7 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Letters; Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.; Statewide, Hawaii. SWCA has submitted seven Section 7 letters to USFWS in coordination with Bureau Veritas in support of ESA compliance for new cellular tower construction. Role: Project Manager. Coordinated with Bureau Veritas and subject matter experts to assess whether projects would impact state- and federally listed species. East Maui Water Lease Environmental Impact Study Biological Support; Wilson Okamoto Corporation; Maui County, Hawaii. Wilson Okamoto Corporation invited SWCA to support the biological sections of the EIS for the East Maui Water Lease. SWCA conducted a computer- based vegetation mapping effort to quantify existing vegetation coverage, performed flora and fauna field surveys, and drafted a biological resources report, including a literature research on the natural history of the mosquito-bome impacts to native birds. Role: Project Manager. Managed client communication and staff coordination, provided QA/QC for final reports. Page 12 APPENDIX k WILDLIFE ( FAUNA) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Species c4 u4. a`» c`' o Mammals f Lariurus cinereus sentotus Forest Birds T Moho braccatus Forest Birds T Moho bishopi Forest Birds T Corvus hasvatiensis Forest Birds ' 1' Chasiempis sandwtchensts sclaters Forest Birds T Forcst Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds ' 1' Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forcst Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forcst Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Forest Birds T Chasiempis sardwichensis ; bides Chasiempis sandwichensis sandwichensisMyadestes myadeshnus Myadestes lanaiensts Myadestes obscurus Myadestes palnteri Pstttirostra psittacea Loxioides bailleui Pseudonesior xanthophrys Hemignathus wrens Hemignathus flavus Ilemignathus kauaiens s Hemignathus parvus Ifemignathus procerus Hemignathuslucidus hanapepe Ifemignathus lucidus anis Hemignathus munroi Oreomystis bairdi Oreomystis mana Paroreomy_ a maculata Paroreomy_ a flammea Paroreomy: a montana Loxops caeruleirostns Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1. 2005 e Hawaiian hoary bat Kaua' i ` o' o Bishop' s ' o' o Hawaiian crow Kaua` i ` elepaio Oahu ' elepaio Hawai' i ' elepaio Large Kaua' i thrush Molokai thrush Hawaii thrush Small Kaua' i thrush o' liPatnaMaui parrotbill Hawaii ' amakihi Oahu ' amakihi Kaua' i ` amakihi 1, esser ` amakihi Kaua' i ' akialoa Kaua' i nuku pu' u Maui nuku pu` u akiapola' au Kaua` i creeper Iiawai` i creeper Oahu creeperMolokai creeper Maui creeper Kaua' i ' akepa v a ata, e opc' apc' a 8' 0 ' a' a b' oslatselepaio elepaio elcpaio kima' o oloma' o Oma' opuaiohi8' 0palilaklkekoa amakihiamakihialawi kihianianiauakialoanuku pu' u nuku pu' u akiaptila' au akikikinonealauahiokakawahie alauahioakekc' c ee` ca Opc' ape' a Kauai ` S` o Bishop' s ' o' o Hawaiian Crow Kauai ' elepaio Oahu ' elepaio Hawaii ' elepaio Kama' o Oloma' o Oma' oPuaiohi PalilaMaui Parrotbill Hawaii ' amakihi Oahu ' amakihi Kauai ' amakihi AnianiauKaua` i ' akialoa Kaua` i nuku pu' u Maui nuku pu' u Akiapola' au AkikikiHawaii creeper O' ahu ' alauahio Moloka' i creeper Maui ' alauahio Akeke' e 0 0 r XX X X T= terrestrial, F= tresliwater, A= anchialine. M= marine Blue: ESA threatened/ endangered: Yellow: ESA Candidate Island Distribution ( Current ( bold) and historic tunbold) i` 00 rc 0 x X 0c 0 x x? X X? X X X? X X X X X X X X X X X X X 1' r0\, e x X X Page A- 1 APPENDIX A: WILDLIFE ( FAUNA) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Species oQ ` y Gto + 49 44 p8 Forest Birds ' f Loxops coccineus ochraceus Forest Birds T Loxops coccineus coccineus Forest Birds T Vestiaria coccinea Forest Birds T Palmeria dolei Forest Birds T Himatione sanguinea Forest Birds T Melamprosops phaeosoma Raptors T Buteo solitarius Raptors T Asioflammeussandwichensis Waterbirds T/ F/ A Nycticorax nycticorax hoactil Waterbirds T/ F Branta sandvicensis Waterbirds T/ F Anas wyvilliana Waterbirds T/ F Anas laysanensis Waterbirds T/ F Gallinula chloropus sandvicensis Waterbirds T/ F Fulica alai Waterbirds T/ F/ A Himantopus mexicanus knudseni Seabirds Seabirds T Phoebastria imntutabiiis T Phoebastria nigripes Seabirds T Phoebastria albatrus SeabirdsSeabirdsSeabirdsSeabirds T Pterodroma sandwichensis T Pterodroma hypoleuca T Bulweria bulwerii T Ptf Snus paciftcus Seabirds T Pujfiinus nativitatis Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy co Maui ' akepa Hawaii ` akepa Crested honeycreeper apapanePo` ouli akepa akepa iikohekoheapapanepo' ouli Hawaiian hawk Hawaiian short - eared owl pueo Black - crowned night heronHawaiian goose Hawaiian Duck Laysan Duck Hawaiian common moorhen/ gallinulc Hawaiian coot Hawaiian stilt auku` u ncnckoloa maoli nonealae ' ula alae ke` oke` o ae' o Laysan albatross moll Black - footed albatross ka` upu Short - tailed albatross none Hawaiian petrel ' ua` u Bonin petrel none Bulwer' s petrel ' ou Wedge- tailed shearwater ' ua' u kani Christmas shearwater none r Maui ' akepa Akepa AkohekoheApapane Po' ouliHawaiian Hawk Puco Black - crowned Night HeronHawaiian goose Hawaiian Duck Laysan Duck Hawaiian moorhen Hawaiian coot Hawaiian stilt Laysan Albatross Black - footed Albatross Short - tailed Albatross Hawaiian Petrel X Bonin Petrel X Bulwer' s Petrel X Wedge- tailed X ShearwaterChristmas Shearwater X T= terrestrial. F= freshwater, A= anchialine. M= marine October 1, 2005 Blue: ESA threatened/ endangered. Yellow: ESA Candidate i Island Distribution ( Current ( bold) and historic ( unbold) Fri° 0 X X X? X X X X X? XX X x x X x x X x x X x x X XXXX X X? X X X XXX X XX X XX X XX X X Page A- 2 APPENDIX A: WILDLIFE ( FAUNA) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Species GemSeabirdsSeabirds T Seabirds T Seabirds T Seabirds T Seabirds T Seabirds Seabirds SeabirdsSeabirds Seabirds Seabirds Scabirds SeabirdsSeabirdsMigratoryI3irdsMigratoryBirdsMigratoryBirds Migratory BirdsMigratoryBirds TI' TTTTTTT/ F 4 4, 1e 44. 1 Puffinus auricularis newel Oceanodroma castro Oceanodroma tristrami Phaethon lepturus Phaethon rubncatula Sula dactylatra Sala leucogaster Sala sadaFregata minor Sterna lunates Sternafuscara Anous stohdus Anous annulusProcelsterna cerulea iygis alba Anas americana T/ F Anas clypeata T/ F Anas acuta T/ F Aythya affinis T/ F/ A Pluviabsfuhw Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 Co 4. 44 Newell' s shearwater ' a' o Band- rumpcd storm ' akc' ake petrelTnstram' s storm petrel none White- tailed tropicbird koa` c kca Rcd- tailcd tropicbird koa' c ' ula Masked ( blue - faced) ' a boobyBrown booby Red - footed booby Great frigatcbird Gray - backed tern Sooty tem Brown noddy Black noddy Blue - gray noddy White ( Fairy) tem American wigeon Northern shoveler Northern pintail Lesser scaup Pacific golden plover aaiwa pakalakalaewa' cwa noio- kbhli nolononemanu- o- K6 none koloa mobil koloa mapu none kblca 4• Newell' s Shearwater Band- nunpcd Storm PetrelTnstram' s Storm Petrel Whitc- tailcd Tropicbird Red- tailed Tropicbird Masked ( blue - faced) BoobyBrown Booby Rcd- footed Booby Great Frigatebird Gray - backed Tern Sooty Tem Brown Noddy Black Noddy Blue - gray Noddy White ( Fairy) Tcm American Wigeon Northern Shoveler Northem Pintail Lesser Scaup Pacific Golden Plover Island Dismhntion ( Current ( bold) and historic ( unbolt!) res 0 X? X coo J\ X X? X1 X X X X x x x x X x x X x X x X x X xXXX x X x x x x X X x x x x x X x x x x x X x x x x x X x x x x x X x x x x x T= terrestrial, F= freshwater, A= anchialine, M= marine Blue: ESA threatened/ endangered; Yellow: ESA Candidate A Page A- 3 APPENDIX A: WILDLIFE ( FAUNA) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Species c° G MigratoryBirds Migratory T/ F Numenius lahinensis BirdsMigratory T/ F/ A Arenaria interpres BirdsMigratory T/ F Calidris alba BirdsNWHI T passerinesNWHI T passerinesNWHI T passerinesInvertebrates T Achannella spp. Invertebrates T Adelocosa anops T/ F/ A Heleroscelusrncanus Acrocephalus fanliharis kingi Telespi: a cantons 7elespi: a ultimo Invertebrates T Spelaeorchesna koloana Invertebrates T Manduca blackburnl Invertebrates - T Order Archaeogastropoda snailsInvertebrates - T Order Stylommatophora snailsInvertebrates - T Order Acari arachnidsInvertebrates- T Order Araneae arachnids Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1. 2005 ir Wandering tattler Bristle- thtghed curlew Ruddy tumstonc Sanderling Nihoa millerbird Laysan finch Nihoa finch kioca akckekc hunakai none none none Oahu tree snails none Kauai cave wolf spider none Kauai cave amphipod none Blackbum' s sphinx moth none Land snarls Land snails Mites and Ticks Spiders none none none none 4• Wandenng fattier Bristle- thighed Curlew Ruddy Tumstone Sanderling Nihoa Millerbird Laysan finch Nihoa finch O` ahu Tree Snails Kauai cave arthropods Kauai cave arthropods Blackburn' s Sphinx MothLand snails Land snails Mites and Ticks Spiders Island Distribution ( Current ( bold) and historic ( unbold) ) X e 46 X x X X X x x X x x x X x x x X X X x x x x x X x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X ? X x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X ? T= terrestrial. F= freshwater. A= anchialine, M= marine Blue: ESA threatened/ endangered; Yellow: ESA Candidate Page A- 4 APPENDIX A: WILDLIFE ( FAUNA) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Species Invertebrates - arachnidsInvertebrates - insectsInvertebrates - insects Invertebrates - insectsInvertebrates - insectsInvertebrates - insects Invertebrates - insectsInvertebrates - insects Invertebrates - insccts Invertebrates - insectsInvertebrates - insectsInvertebrates - insccts Invertebrates - insectsInvertebrates - insects T Order Pscudoscorpiomda T Order Archaeognatha T Order Coleoptera T Order Collembola T Order Dermaptera T Order Diptera r Order Heteroptcra T Order Ilomoptcra T Order Ilymenoptcra T Order Lepidoptera T Order Neuroptcra T Order Odonata T Order Orthoptera T Order Phthiraptcra Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1. 2005 001, co Pseudoscorpions O lB none Bristlethighs none Beetles nonc Springtails none Earwigs none True ( lies none rruc bugs none Aphids, plant hoppers, none leaf hoppers, psyllids, whiteflics, mcalybugs, scales, etc. Ants, bees, and wasps none Moths, butterflies. and none hyposmocomaLacewings, antlions none Damselflies, dragonflies none Grasshoppers, crickets. none katydidsLice none 4 False Scorpions Bristlethighs Beetles Springtails Earwigs True flies True bugs Aphids, Hoppers, Whitcflies. Mcalybugs, Scale Insects Bees and Wasps Moths and Butterflies Lacewings and antlions Damselflies and DragonfliesCrickets and Katydids Lice Island Distribution ( Current ( bold) and historic ( unbold} ) v do x X X X X X X X X X X x x X X X X X X X X X T= terrestrial, F= freshwater. A= anchialine, M= marine Blue: ESA threatened/ endangered: Yellow: ESA Candidate X X A Os t- x x X x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X X x x x x x x x x x x x x X X X X X X ? X X X X X ? x x x x x x x x x x Page A- 5 APPENDIX A: WILDLIFE ( FAUNA) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Species Cts° off • i, Q• Invertebrates - insects Invertebrates - T insectsInvertebrates - T insectsInvertebrates- T crustaceansInvertebrates - T myriapodsInvertebrates - T myriapodsInvertebrates - T myriapodsInvertebrates - T myriapodsFishes F Fishes F Fishes F Fishes F Fishes F Crustaceans F Crustaceans F Molluscs F Molluscs F Molluscs F Molluscs F Molluscs F Order Psocoptera Order Siphonaptera Order Thysanoptcra Order Isopoda Order Geophilomorpha Order Lithobimorpha Order Polyxenida Order Spirostreptida Awaous guamensis Eleotris sandwicensis Lentipes concolor Sicyopterus slintpsoni Stenogobius hawaiiensis Alyoida bisulcata Macrobrachium grandimanus Clithon cariosus Clithon neglectus Erinna aulacospira Erinna newcombi Ferrissia sharpi Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1. 2005 Bark Lice. psocids Fleas Thrips Pill - bugs, sowbugs Centipedes Centipedes Millipedes Millipedes noneHawaiian sleeper O' opu alamo' o O` opu nopili O' opu naniha Mountain ` opae Ilawaiian prawn nonenone noneNewcomb' s snail none 0 G 4 0 none none none none none none none none O' opu nrtkea o` opu akupa 6' opu alamo` o i opu nopili o` opu naniha opae kala` ole opae` oeha` a pipiwai hihiwai, pipipi, pipipi kai, pipipi wainone nonenone 44• Bark lice and Psocids Fleas Thrips Pill - bugs, Sowbugs, Woodlice, Isopods Centipedes Centipedes Millipedes Millipedes Awaous guamensis Eleotris sandwicensis Lentipes concolor SicyopterusStenogobiusMountain Shrimp HI Prawn ClithonNeritilia Clithon Neritilia Erinna Lymnaea Newcomb' s Snail Ferressia Island Distribution ( Current ( bold) and historic ( unbold) 1 o° 0° X w1'), p 00 X X X a° 1 iia` 4,"• X X 7 X X X X X T= terrestrial, F= freshwater, A= anchialine, M= marine Blue: ESA threatened/ endangered; Yellow: ESA Candidate X X Page A- 6 n e e APPENDIX A: WILDLIFE ( FAUNA) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Species GAOMolluscsMolluscs MolluscsMolluscs Flatworm F Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Crustaceans Ah Lymnaea producta F Lymnaea rubella F Neritina granosa F Neritina vespertina Oahuhawaiiana ka: ukolinda Calliasmata pholidota Carnarimelita janstocki Grandidierella koa Grandidierella palama Halocaridina palahemo llolocaridma rubra Liagoceradocus lonomaka Metabetaeus lohena Nuuanu amrkai Palaemonella burnsi Paramoera lokowai Paramoera paakai Paramoera rua Parhyale hawaiensis none nonenonenone nonenonenone none none none nonc none nonenone nonenone none none none oc 44 none nonehihiwai or wi hapawai or Iiapakainonenonenone none none noneopac ' ula, ' opac hiki none none none nonc none none none none i` r c Erinna Lymnaca Erinna Lymnaea Ncritina Snails Neritina Snails WormsAnchialine Shrimp Anchialinc Amphipod Anchialinc Amphipod Anchialinc Amphipod Anchialinc Shrimp Anchialine Shrimp Anchialine Amphipod Anchialine Shrimp Anchialine Amphipod Anchialine Shrimp Anchialine Amphipod Anchialine Amphipod Anchialinc Amphipod Anchialinc Amphipod 0 XX Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy " T= terrestrial, F= freshwater. A= anchialine, M= marine October 1. 2005 Blue: ESA threatened/ endangered; Yellow: ESA Candidate Island Distribution ( Curren ( bold) and historic ( unbold) ) pP P ` ti`; r o or t.•° X X X X X VC re XX XX X XX X X X XX X X Page A- 7 APPENDIX A: WILDLIFE ( FAUNA) SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Species Ge o l9 O Crustaceans A l' rocarrs hawarana Crustaceans A Rotomelita ana Crustaceans A Rotomelita Woo Crustaceans A Crustaceans A Molluscs A Mammals M Mammals M Mammals M Mammals M Mammals M Mammals M Mammals M Mammals M Vetericaris chaceorum Antecardina lauensis 4eritilia hawaiiensis Balaenoptera acutorostrata Balaenoptera borealis Balaenoptera edeni Balaenoptera musculus Balaenoptera physalus Eubaleanajaponica Feresa attenuata Globicephala macrorhynchus Mammals M Grampus griseus Mammals M Indopacetus pacificus Mammals M Kogia breviceps Mammals M Kogia sima Mammals M hagenodelphis hoset Mammals M Megaptera novaeangliae Mammals M : Mesoplodon densirostris Mammals M Monachus schauinslandi Mammals M Orcinus orca Hawaii' s Comprehensive IKldlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 none none none none noneAnchialine pond snail Minke whale Sei whaleBrvde' s whale Blue Whale Fin whaleNorthern right whale Pygmy killer whale Short - finned pilot whale e. rc none Anchialine Shrimp none Anchialine Amphipod none Anchialine Amphipod none Anchialine Shrimp none Anchialine Shrimp none Clithon Neritilia none Baleen Whales none Baleen Whales none Baleen Whales none Baleen Whales none Baleen Whales none Baleen Whales none Toothed Whales none Pilot Whale Risso' s dolphin none Longman' s beaked whale none Pygmy sperm whale Dwarf sperm whale Fraser' s dolphin Humpback whale Blainesville' s beaked whale or densebeaked whaleHawaiian monk seal Killer whale Toothed Whales Toothed Whales none Toothed Whales none Toothed Whales none Toothed Whales kohola Humpback Whale none Toothed Whales ilio- holo- i- ka- Monk Seal uauanone Toothed Whales Island Distribution ( Current ( bold) and historic lunhold) j J XX XX t` JsaX T= terrestrial, F= freshwater, A= anchialine, M= marine Blue: ESA threatened/ endangered, Yellow: ESA Candidate Page A- 8 Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var./ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* GSNY* Important interaction*** AbairIon eremitopetalum X X Abutilon menziesii X Abulllon sandwicense X Acacia koa koa X Acacia koala koala; koa oha X Acaena exigua X Achyranthes matica X Achyranthes splendens rotundata X Adenophorus periens X Alectryon macrococcus vac amtahierais mallet X X Alectryon InaCTOCOCCIIS ar. macrococcus X Alphilonia ponderosa kauila X Alyxla olivjrmis matte X Amaranthus brownii X X Antidesmo plalyphyllum hamc X Argyroxiphium kauense X Argyroxiphium sandwicense subsp. sandwicense ' ahinahina X X Argyroxiphium sandwicense suhsp. mocrocephalum ' abinabina X X Asplenium penrvianum oar. insulare X Astelia menziesiana pa' iniu X Astelia waialealae painiu X X Aihyriwn microphyllum ' akolea X Riders campyloiheca subsp. waihoiensis X Riders hilebrandiana suhsp. hillebrandiana ko' oko' olau X Hiders micrantha subsp. ctenophylla X Bidens micramha subsp. kaleolaha X Riders spp. kokolau, ko' okoolau X Bidens wiebkei X Bobea elalio ahakea X Bobea month, ahakea X Boehmeria grand' s X Ra/ boschoenus marabous subsp. pabrdosus X Bonamia menziesii X Brighamia insignis' olulu X X Brighamia rockii X Broussaisia argura kanawao X Caesalpinia kavoiensis uhiuhi X X Canavalia molokaiensis X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var/ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status' GSN?`• Important interaction*** Carraralia pubescens X Cambium odoratism alahee X Capparis sandwichiana maiapilo X Carex alligata X Cares spp. sedge X Cenchrus agrin' onioides agrimonioides X Ceniaurium sehaeoides X Chamaesyce celamroides koenana ' akoko X X Chamaesyce deppeana X Chamaesyce eleanoriae X Chamaesyce halemonui X Chamaesyce herbstii X Chamaesvce kuwaleana X Chamaesyce olowaluona akoko X Chamaesyce rock ii X Chamaesyce skoasbergii skottshergii X Chorpentiera obovma papala X Charpentiera spp. papala X Cheirodendron platvphyllurn lapalapa X Cheirodendron trigonum ' olapa X Chenopodium oahuense ' aweoweo X Cibotium chamissot hapu' u X Cibotium glaucum hapu' u X Cibotium spp. hapu' u X Cladium jamaicense ' Mai X Claoxylon sandaicense pooloa X Clermontia clermondoides ohawai X Clermontia drepanomorpha X Clermontia found haha' aiakamanu X Clermontia / indsey' ana X Clermontia oblongiijolia suhsp. brevipes ' oha wai X X Clermontia oblongf lia suhsp. s ' oha wai X X Clermontia Mauna subsp. peleana ' oha wai X X Clermontia pyrularia ' oha wai X X Clermontia samuelii suhsp. hanaensis X Clermontiasamuelii subsp. samuelii X Clermontia spp. oha, ' dm wai, halm, uha kepau X Colubrina oppositjfolia X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix S: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & GenusC prosmeCoprosma Coprosma CoprasmaCoprosma CoprosmaCoprosmaCoprosmaCoprosmaCryplocaryaCannaCyanea CyaneaCyanea CyaneaCyanea Qanea CyaneaCyanea Cyanea Cyanea Cyanea Cyanea CyaneaCyaneaCyaneaCyanea Cyanea Cyanea CyaneaCyanea CyaneaCymreaCyaneaCyanCyaneaCyaneaCyanea flowering Plante Species elflpteaernodeoideskauensis montaneochrooet, pubenr rhynchocarpa n, - man,," squamigera a wnfnaraasarifaliaasplemjatiacopelandii capelandil adipadunbariae e/ eeleensisgibsoniiglabragr( imestanagrlmesianahamatPorahamatyorahorrida humboldtianakoolauensiskuhihewa lobatelangytora magnicalyxmarmrimceldowneyimunroiobtusaptnnatfdaplatphylla var. lsubsp. Subspecies Wasp. copelandu subsp. haleakalaentls subsp. grinwsrana subsp. obatae subsp. earlsonit subsp hama4'/ ora auhsp. labara Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 Common/ Hawaiian name pitakukainene pilopilo pilo pitoPbbpita pitoholio haha hahahahababa baba halm Naha haha haha haha huhu haha babatuba haha aku` aku Federal status' GSM** Important interaction`** XXXX XXX XXX XX X X X XX X XXX XX X X XXXXX X X X XX X XXXX X XXX X xX X XXXX X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild Xamportant habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var./ subsp. Subspecies Cyanea procera Cyanea proJuga Cyanea purpmellllla Cyanea recta Cyanea relnyi Cyanea uvularis Cyanea sessilifolia Cyanea shipmanii Cyanea solanacea Cyanea spp. Cyanea se- Johnii Cyanea stictaphyila Cyanea superba Cyanea superba Cyanea nitamantha Cyanea truncate Cyanea undulam Cyclosorus interruptus Cyperus fauriei Cyperus laevigatus Cyperus adoratur Cyperus pennatf rmis Cvpervs pennatf rmis Cyperus trachysanthos Cyrtandra crenam Cyrmndra eyaneoides Cyrtandra deniata Cyrtandra _ Nipes Cyrtandra gpardii Cyrtandra gracilis Cyrtandra halmvensis Cyrtandra hernams Cyrtandra kaulantha Cyrtandra kecdiae subsp. kealiae Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* GSN?** Important interaction*** haha X X haha X haha X XXXX haha X X popolo, haha nui X X haha X X haha X X subspsuperba haha X X subsp. regina X akuhaha X X haha X X ncke fern X makalwt X bcvana X pennat f rmis XX XX XX X ha' iwale X ha' iwale X ha' iwale X ha' iwale X X XX X Cyrtandra munroi Cyrtandra oxyhapha Cyrtandra paliku Cyrtandra polyantha Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 ha' iwale X X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var./ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* GSN?" Important interaction*" Cyrtandra sesstbs ha' iwale X X Cyrtandra spp X Cyrtandra subumbellara X Cyrtandra tintinnabula X Cyrtandra viridplora X Cyrtandra waiolani ha' iwale X Delissea niihauensis subsp. kauaiensis X X Delissea niihauensis subsp. niihauensis X Delissea rhyliidosperma X X Delissea rivularn haha X Delissea subeordata X X Delissea undulata X X X Deschampsia nubigena X Dianella odorata uki X Dicranapteris thwarts ' uluhe X Dlellia ereeta X Dlellia falcate' X Dlellia mannii X Die/ iia pallida X X Dielllia unisora X Diospyros sandwicensis lama X Diplazium molokaiense X X Diplazium sanwichtananum ho' fo X Dodonaea viscose, ' a' ali' I X Dracaena aurea halapepe X Dryopteris angelica X Dryopieris ennalis podosorus X Dryopteris spy. X Dryopteris tetrapinnaw X Dubautia arborea na' ena' e X Dubaulia herbstobalae X Dubautia kenwoodii na' ena' c X Dubaulia lm(( ollu X Dubautia paleala a' ena' e pua kea X Dubautia pauciflorula naenac X X Dubautia plantaginea subsp. magnifolia X X Dubautia plantaginea subsp. humilis X Duhauha radlard: aides na' ena' e' ula X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species ser./ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* GSN?** Important interaction*** Dubawia spp mama X Elaeocarpus bJidus kalia X Elaphoglossum s/ as ekaha; laukahi nunui X Eragrostis fosbergii X Eragrostis momicola X Eragrostis v riabilis kawelu X Erythrina sande. icensis wiliwili X Eugenia koolauensis X Euphorbia haeleeleanu X Euphorbia spp. koko or akoko X Erocarpos ( uteolus X PTueggeaa r a X Freycinetia arborea isie X Gahnia lanaiensis X X Gardenia brighamii nano X X Gardenia manna X Geranium arboreum hinahina X X Geranium kauaiense X Geranium mulliorum X Geranium widens hinahina X Gossypium tomentosa make X Gouania hillebrandii X GouaniaX Gouania mlflia X X Haplostachys haplostachya X ledymis cookiana ' awiavi X X lledyotis coriacea X Hedyotis degeneri coprnsmifolia X Hedyotis degeneri degeneri X Hedyolis haupuensis pilo X Mediates manna pilo X X Hedyotis parvula X Hedyotis schlechtendahliana remyi kopa X X tledyofis styohnii X X Hedyofis terminalis manono X Hedyotis terminal' s manono X Helioaopium anomalum Nina hina X lieliotropium curassavuvm kipnkai X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var. lsubsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* GSM** Important interaction*** Hesperomannia arborescens X klesperomannia arbuscula X X Hesperomannia lydgatei X Lleteropogon contortus pili grass X Hibiscadelphus distans hau kuahiwi X X Hibiscadelphus gfardianus hau kuahiwi X X Ilihiscadelphus hualalaiensis hau kuahiwi X X Hibiscadelphus woodii hau kuahiwi X X Hibiscus arnanianus haubele, hau X X Hibiscus brackenridgei subspmokuleianur mao hau heic X X Hibiscus brackenridgei subsp. brackenridgei X Hibiscus brackenridgei subspmolokoiana mao hau heic X Hibiscus clavi kokio ' ula' ula: aloalo X X Hibiscus kokio X Hibiscus tiliaceus hau X Hibiscus waimeue subsp. hannerae X Huperzia manna X Huperzia nutans wawaeiole X X Huperzia stemmermannlae iole X X Ilex anornala kawa' u X Ipomoea spp X sachne distichophldla ohe X Ischaemum byrone X Isodendrion hosakae X Isodendrion laurflium X sodendrion langiifolium X sodendrion py' rf lium aupaka; wahine noho kula X X Jacqucmantia ovalflia subsp. sandwicensis X Jainvillea adscender, s X Kanaloa kahoolawensis X X Kokia caokei kokio X X Kokia drvnarioides hau hele' ula; kokio X X Kokia kauaiensis X Labordia cynandrae kainakahala X X Labordia lydgatei X X Labordia s,, nov. X Labordia dnflia wahiawaensls kamakahala X X Labordia tiJ lia lanaiensis X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X - important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies GenusLabordia Labordia LepidiumLepturasLipochaeta LipochaemLobelia Lobelia Lobelia Lobelia LobeliaLysimachia LysimachiaLysimachia Lysimachia LysimachiaLysimachia LysimachiaLysimachia MachaerinaMarsileaMelanthera Melanthera Melanthera MelantheraMelanthera Melanthera MelantheraMelicope Melicope Melicope MelicopeMelicope Melicope Melicope MelicopeMelicope Melicope Flowering Plants Species triflora waialaealearhuscularepenslobma spagaudichaudii monoslachyaniihauensisoahuensis nnfiljlla inikilydgatei maximapendensscopulensis venomangusr+ folia villosafourieikomolensis micrantha tnicranrha tenu j lia venosawalmeaentisadscendensanisalabailout clusilloliacrucialadegeneri haupuensishiiakaeknwd' eniilydgatei var. hubsp. Subspecies subspleprophv0a suhspkoolauensis subsp. exigua subsp. micrantha Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 Common/ Hawaiian name kamakahala X X kamakahala lau li 1 Federal status* GS\'?** Important interaction*** ukiihi' ihilauakea alanimokihanaalanikukaema pilo ' ula alani alanialani alani alani X X XXXX X XX X X X X x X X X X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var./ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status" GSN?" Important interaction"' Mel dope macropus X Mellcolm makahae X Mel/ cope mucronulata alani X X Me ! Mope X Me dope milts X Melicope pallida X Melicope paniculata X Melicope quadrangularis X Me// cope recur X Melicolx aintjohm, X Melicope cahlbruckneri alani X X Metrosideros palymorpha ' ohia X Microlepia strigosa muuiensis X Munroidendron racemosurn X Myaporum sandwicense naio X Myrsine juddi X Myrsine knudsen/ i kolea X Myrsine lessertiana kolea X Myrsine Iinearlfolia X Myrsine mezii kolea X X Myrsine sar dwlchensis kolca laulil X Myrsine sp kolea X Nama sandwicensis X Neowawraea IMAM', braes mehamehame X Neraudia angulata dentam X Neraudia angulata angulata X Neraudia masa X X Neraudia sericea X Nestegis sandwtrensis olopua X n' othocestrum brevjorum ' aiea X X Nothocestrum latj lium ' aiea X Nothocesvvm longifolium X Nathan, strum pe/ mmm aiea X X hbthocestrum spp X Nomnichium humile X Ochrosia haleakalae X Ochrosia kllaueaensis X realm' us furcatus X Hawaii' s Comprehensive VVtldlife Conservation Strategy October 1. 2005 X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var./ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Ilawaiian name Federal status* GSN?** Important interaction*** Osmanthus ( Olea) sandwicensis X Osleomeles anthyllidijolia uulei X Pandanus odoratisaiumu hala; lauhala X Pandanus tectorws Gala X Panloun lousier carter: X Pan/ aim niihauense lau' ehu X X Panicum P2 X Pe/ ea spp. alai X Peperomia subpetiolata ' ala' ala wai nui X X Perroaetia sandwicengs olomea X Peucedanum sandwicense X Phyllostegia Magenta X Phyllostegia brevidens X Phyllostegia glabra lanalensls X Phyllostegia haleakatae X X Phyllostegia Hellen X Phyllostegia hirsuta X Phyllostegia hispida X X Phyllostegia kaalaensis X X Phyllostegia knudsenii X X Phyllostegiamannii X X Phyllostegia molliX Phyllostegia parvJlora parvflora X Phyllostegia panylora ( vdgatei X X Phyllostegia parwparc glahriuscula X Phyllostegia pllasa X X Phyllostegia racemosa kiponapona X X Phyllostegia renovans X Phyllostegia stachyoides X Phyllostegia vagina X Phyllostegia wombat, X X Phyllostegia warshaueri X X Phyllostegiana X X Pipturus Pp ra mamaki X Pisonia sandwicensis aulu X Pisonia spp. papala kepau X Pisano umbell7 ra papala kepau X Pittosporum halophyllum ho' awa X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X - Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var. lsubsp. Subspecies Common/ nawaiian name Federal status* GSN?" Important interaction"' Pittosporum hawaiiense hoawa X Pittosporum hosmeri hoawa X PittoslPittosporums' hoawa X rwhoawa X Pivasporum iermilioidw Plantago hawaiensis X Plantago princeps anomala X Plantago princeps laxfrlia X Plantago princeps longibracteata X Montagu princeps princeps X Platanthera holochila X X Platydesma companulaw pilo kea X Platydesma remyi X Pleomele forbesit X Pleomele hawaziensis X Poa manMi X Paa sandvicensis X Poa siphonoglosso X Porlulaca sderocarpa X Portulaca sp. A X Pritchardia finis loulu X X Pritchardia aylmenrobinvonii loulu X X Pritchardia beccarriona loulu X Pritchardia glabrata loulu X Pritchardia kaalae X Pritchardia muni loulu X X Pritchardia napaliensis X Pritchardia remota X Pritchardia schattaueri loulu X X Pritchardio sp. l loulu X Pritchardia spp. X Pritchardia viscosa loulu X X Pseudomorus sandwicensts aiai X Psychoiria grandi/ flora kopiko X X Psychoiria hexondre oahuensis kopiko X X Psychotria hobdyi X Psychotria sp. kopiko X Psydrox odorala alahe' e X Plera( yria kauaiensis X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X - fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern. Fern Allies A Flowering Plants Genus Species var./ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* GSN?** Important interaction*** Pteralyxia macrocarpu kaulu X Pteris lidgatei X Pvschoaia hawaiiensis kopiko X Racoml6ium lanuginosum X Ranunculus mauiensis X Raowolha sanchvicensis hao X Remya kauaiensis X Remya mauiensis X X Remya monlgomeryi X X Reynoldsia sandwicensis oh; ohe makai X Rhynchospora chinereis subsp. spicfor mis kuolohia X Rubus hawalensis ' akala X Sadleria cyatheoides amaumau X Saniculaa ve X Sanlcula purpureaX Sanmlum elliptiman ' iliahialo' e X Samalum freycinetianum lanalense X S' antalum jreycinetianum ' iliahi X Sapirdus oahuensis kaulu X Sapindus s panaria a' e X Scaevolaa X Scaevola glabra ' aim naupaka X Scaevo/ a procera naupaka kuahiwi X Scaevola sencea naupaka kahakai X Scaevola sp. naupaka X Schiedea adamantis X X Schiedea apokremnos X Schiedea attenuate X X Schiedea haleakalensis X Schiedea hawaiiensis X Schiedea hellei x x Schiedea hooker; X Schiedea jacobii X Schiedea kaalae X X Schiedea kauaiensis X X Schiedea kealiae X Schiedea Mull X Schiedea lychnoides X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies & Flowering Plants Genus Species var./ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* GSN?" Important interact ion*** Schiedea lydgaiei X Schiedea membranacea X Schiedea nnualhi X x Schiedea ohovata X X Schiedea perlmanhi X Sehiedea puhescens X Schiedea sal@aria X Schiedea sarmentosa X Schiedea spergulitio X Schiedea spergulina leiopoda X Schiedea ste/ lw' ioufes X Schiedea trinernH X Schiedea vntmillato X Schiedea vtseosa X X Schoenoptecius lacusvis subsp. validus ' aka' akai X Sesbania lomentosa ' ohai X X Ses; rvtum nortatacastrum ' akiikdi X Sicyos alba ' anon X X Sighs lanceolaidea ' noun X Sida flax ' ilima X Sideroxylon sandwlcense aulu, kaulu X Silent alexandri X X Slfene hawaiiensis X Silent lanceolata X Stene perlmanii X Smilax tnelastomi" olia pl' oi X So/ anam americanum popolo X Solarium incompletion popolo ku mai X X Soloman sandwicense popolo' aiakeakua X X Solanum nelsonii Melo X Sophora chrysophyda mamane X Spermolepis howaiiemis X Sparc bolus virgieicia ' ak' iaki X Stenogyne angust folia X Shettogyne bifida X X Stenogyne uvnpanulara X X Stenogyne cranwelliae X Stemgyne kaa' ae subsp_ sheijei X Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate. Proposed Endangered Xtfewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern, Fern Allies A flowering Plants Genus Species vachubsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* GSN?** Important interaction*** Signorine kanehoana X X S'lenogy' ne keatiae X Stenogyne macrantha ma' ohinhi X Signorine purpurea X Stenogyne nsgosa ma' ohiohi X Stenogyne serophularioides mabhiohi X Styphelia tameiameiae pukiawe X Syygium sandwicensis ' ohi' a ha X T nomolapium armarium Wasp. orenarium X Tetramolopium capillare X Tetramolopium diersingii X Tetramolopium fslijvrme *' w h if r e X Tetramolopium Illiorme ens polyphyllum X Tenamalopium lepidomm suhsp. lepidomm X X Tetramolopium rnnyi X X Tetramolopium rocks, caleisabulorum X Tetramolopium radii rackil X Tetraplasondra bisavenuata ' oho mauka X Tetraplasandra Jfyrnii ' ohc' olic X Tetraplasandra gymnocaapu X Tetraptasandra hawaiensis ohe' nhe X Tetraplasandra sp. ohe X Tauchardia lwiih5a otona X Tremmalobelia singularis X Vivra kaalae opuhe X X Urere sandvicerssis opuhe X Vacciniam ealyclnum blmlq' ohelo kau la' au X Vaccinum reacutatum ` oheio X Vaccinium sap X Vicia mermies; i X X Vigra o- wahuensis X Viola chamismniann subsp. chamissaniana X rola helenae X X Viola kauaensis wahiawaensls nani al ' a X X Viola lanaiensis X X Viola oahuenvir X Wikstroemia monticola ' akia X Wikstroemia oahuensis ' akia X X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate, Proposed Endangered Hawaii' s Comprehensive Wild/ iie Conservation Strategy ** X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild October 1, 2005 *** X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fern. fern Allies & Flowering Plants Species varfsubsp. Subspecies Naumanphillyreioliasanwicensisskottsbergianagwmnoriphium lwMj erecrenatumhawaiiensedipetahanhmvaiiense oahuem e VV Genus WiknroemiaWikstroemia li' ikstroemiaWikstroemia Wilkesla WitkesiaWilkesiaXylosma hyrosmaZanthoxylum ZanthoxylumZanthosyiwnZanthaxylum Aquatic Plants Ilalophila RupPia Endemic Terre Bjornbergiella Dtgrota Na Gula hawaiiana maritime, Algae hawarienyishaenaensis contenm Navicula hawailensis Navicula thurstonensis Scvtonema javonicum Sgtanema pulvi tum Endemic Freshwater Algae Bavachospermum C ladophoraConformComm/ Sion EmiliaWallaFrusru! ia HoemarococcusLophapodiwn LlirhrahGoaaeriasWavieulaWantMilitate spermatophorum Magirss„ ro; ata sandvlcenvisdepauperasum abborriae smithiae cretaborgensio therma/ is sandvicensectadepharoeadscendemgenustsiataahuemiatesmta Hawaii' s Comprehensive Male Conservation Strategy October 1. 2005 Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status" GSN?" Important interaction*" aka X skis X akia X skis X iliau X X x x maua mmentosum kawa' u X X XX Pau hanaiiense valida sit or hea' e scagrasswidgeon grass x X X XX X xxx Xxx XxX XXX X XX X XX XX X= Endangered, Threatened, Candidate. Proposed Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community Appendix B: Wildlife ( Flora) Species of Greatest Conservation Need Endemic Freshwater Algae Genus Species vae/ subsp. Subspecies Common/ Hawaiian name Federal status* CSN?" Important interaction`•" Pitholzhara aJJbvs X Pihophara macroyom X Swurastrum monticulosum duplex X Staurasmun suntan X Stauraneus maunakedensis X Stigonetna aerugincum X Tah; vthris musician ver. navaiensis X Denlepohlia cucculata vac sandvicensis X Trezaepohha diffract res, sandleensis X Xanthictium octocorne ver maniac havaiensis X Endemic Marine Algae Acrachaetiwn da{ vi X Alsidium cymatophtlum X Anlithamnion erucacladellum X Boodteopsis hawaiiensis X Callidictyon abyssorum X Callhhamnielia pacifica X Centroceras cara/ laphilloides X Ceramium cingulum X Ceram = dwnawrum X Ceramium hanaense X Ceramhun tranguillum X Ceramium womersiegi X Chrysymenia glebosa X odium cicatrix X odium caricatum X Corallophila ptilocladiaides X Da nania iri X DanaIrldescrns X Dana kriseniae X Dasya muuravana X Ditria reptans )( Dotyella hawaiiensb X Dogrel/ a irregularis X Do: yank: cus pachcum x Du8tresnwa Wen X Euptdocladia mogruderi X Fernambsiphania eeorlieaa X Gelidiella wamerster x Hawaii' s Comprehensive 114ldlile Conservation Strategy October 1, 2005 X= Endangered Threatened, Candidate, P used Endangered X= fewer than 50 individuals in the wild X= important habitat or dominant plant in community SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION L igital' a 7,,L .1iMi&5p' , 3L t tom, tUMLYA, tObgtq c ru, Ott:;, aE6 RkaAe, is Leg en d Flood Hazard Zones (Zone Type) 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Project Site Regulatory Floodway >C Special Floodway Site Radius at 250'. 500', 1000', 1/2, % & 1 mile 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard FIRM Panel Boundary F. Area with Reduced Risk Due to Levee Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Date: 3/2/2020 National Flood Hazard Layer HIL03345 FA 10553982 LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HAWAII 96778 PN: 6120001112 Source: Selected data from EBI, ESRI & FEMA https:lwww fema.gov/national-flood-hazard-layer-nfhl aienvironmental I engineering I design N EBI Consulting 6120001112 Wetlands Map 1: 1, 804 0 0. 015 0. 03 March 2, 2020 Wetlands Li Freshwater Emergent Wetland Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Freshwater Forested/ Shrub Wetland Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Pond v Lake Other Riverine This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. National cOM NWIr This page was produced mapper USDA United States Department of Agriculture CS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Island of Hawaii Area, Hawaii March 2, 2020 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www nres.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/healtht) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA. Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 Contents Preface 2 Soil Map 5 Soil Map (6120001112 Soils Report) 6 Legend 7 Map Unit Legend (61 200 0111 2 Soils Report) 8 Map Unit Descriptions (6120001112 Soils Report) 8 Island of Hawaii Area, Hawaii 10 659—Malama extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material, 2 to 40 percent slopes 10 660—Olaa cobbly hydrous loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes 11 References 13 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 5 19° 26' 27' N 19' 26' 19' N Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map ( 6120001112 Soils Report) Soil Mip raia not be vdlid d 298370 296! 00 296730 296760 2967' 90 296620 296850 2YBB0 296910 296940 298970 298000 Map Scale: 1: 1, 650 if printed on A landscape ( 11" x 8. 5") Sheet N - 40 . i -- _ - Feet 1V 0 50 100 200 X0 Map projectson: Web Mercator Corner Coordinates: WGS84 Eflge tics: UN Zone 5N WGS84 Metes120 6 Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest ( Aol) Area of Interest ( AOC Soils1 1 Soil Map Unit Potygone y Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features tl Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot ei Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot O Landfill i Lava Flow Marsh or swamp a Mine or Quarry O Miscellaneous Water o Perennial Water y Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Q sinkhole D Slide or Slip fJ Sodic Spot Spoil Area Q Stony Spot a) Very Stony Spot Wet Spot OMer Special Line Features Water FeaturesStreams and Canals Transportation ay - a Rails wave Interstate Highways y US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1: 24000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting sails that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator ( EPSG3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal- area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA- NRCS certified data as of the version date( s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Island of Hawaii Area, Hawaii Survey Area Data: Version 12, Sep 17, 2019 Soil map units are labeled ( as space allows) for map scales 1. 50000 or larger. Date( s) aerial images were photographed. Dec 31, 2009— Nov 28, 2016 The orthophoto or other base map on which the sol lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 7 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend (6120001112 Soils Report) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 659 Malama extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material, 2 to 40 percent slopes 660 Olaa cobbly hydrous loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 22 6.5 8.7 25.6% 74.4% Map Unit Descriptions (6120001112 Soils Report) The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the sails or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or S 100.0%I Custom Soil Resource Report landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however. onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 9 Custom Soil Resource Report Island of Hawaii Area, Hawaii 659—Malama extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material, 2 to 40 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2kIlj Elevation: 0 to 1,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 60 to 120 inches Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 75 degrees F Frost -free period: 365 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Malama and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Malama Setting Landform: Aa lava flows Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear, convex Parent material: Organic material over aa lava Typical profile 2C//0a - 0 to 3 inches: extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material 2C2 - 3 to 50 inches: cobbles 2R - 50 to 60 inches: bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 40 percent Percent of area covered with surface fragments: 3.0 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 40 to 60 inches to lithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Low to moderately low 0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water storage in profile: Very low (about 1.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 7s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 7s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: Isohyperthermic Forest (F162XY500HI) Hydric soil rating: No 10 Custom Soil Resource Report Minor Components Lava flows, 'la Percent of map unit 10 percent Landform: Aa lava flows Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear, convex Hydric soil rating: No 660—Olaa cobbly hydrous loam, 2 to 10 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2kllk Elevation: 100 to 1,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 138 to 197 inches Mean annual air temperature: 70 to 77 degrees F Frost -free period: 365 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Olaa and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit Description of Olaa Setting Landform: Ash fields on aa lava flows Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear, convex Parent material: Basic volcanic ash over aa lava Typical profile Ap - 0 to 4 inches: cobbly hydrous loam Bwr2C1 - 4 to 14 inches: very cobbly hydrous loam 2C2/Bw2 - 14 to 31 inches: extremely stony hydrous loam 2R - 31 to 59 inches: bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 2 to 10 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 26 to 39 inches to lithic bedrock Natural drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Low to moderately low 0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency ofponding: None 11 Custom Soil Resource Report Available water storage in profile: Low (about 4.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Isohyperthermic Forest (Fl62XY500HI) Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Panaewa Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Ash fields on pahoehoe lava flows Landform position (two-dimensional): Backslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear, convex Hydric soil rating: No Lava flows, 'la Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Aa lava flows Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear, convex Hydric soil rating: No 1 12 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/nationalsoils/?cid=nres 142 p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www.nres. usda.gov/wps/porta I/nres/d eta it/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www.nres. usda.gov/wps/porta/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053580 Tner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. httpY/www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/sails/ ho me/?cid=nres 142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 13 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http:/Iwww.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ n res/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=n res 142p2_054242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290.pdf 14 QUALIFICATIONS A, environmental I engineering I design EBI Consulting Kimberly Narel Biologist I 21 B Street Burlington. MA 01803 Office l Mobile: 949.290.0535 Summary of Experience Kimberly Narel, Biologist I, has experience in environmental consulting since 2016 specializing in both natural resources/marine science and environmental health and safety. At EBI Consulting, Ms. Narel serves as a Biologist I within the West Telecom Environmental practice. Her primary responsibilities in this role include conducting Biological and Natural Resource Assessments for FCC National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance Reviews. Relevant Project Experience Ms. Narel prepares Biological and Natural Resource Assessments for a wide range of properties and clients. Natural Resource Assessments focus on evaluating site conditions for potential endangered species and habitats, wetlands, and floodplains, as well as other areas of critical importance to the natural environment. Additionally, Ms. Narel conducts various Biological Assessments, ranging from Avian Nest Surveys to habitat- and/or species-specific surveys and monitoring. In addition to the above -referenced assessments, Ms. Narel has experience in preparing Environmental Assessments, Marine Biological Resource Assessments, Environmental Impact Reports, and technical reports related to coastal construction projects throughout California. Education B.S. Biology: Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, University of California at San Diego Professional Affiliations Member, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Southern California Chapter agEBI Consulting environmental 1 engineering 1 due diligence Ayoola Folarin Biologist 3703 Long Beach Boulevard Suite 421, 2nd Floor Long Beach, CA 90807 Mobile: 619A05.8459 Summary of Experience Ayoola Folarin, Biologist, has extensive experience as a biologist since 2006 specializing in conducting wildlife and habitat assessments, writing and reviewing biological reports, and authoring and implementing regulations under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Her areas of expertise also include the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). At EBI Consulting, Ms. Folarin serves as a Biologist within the West Telecom Environmental group. Her responsibilities in this role include conducting biological assessments, endangered species surveys, biological monitoring, and avian nest surveys throughout the United States. Relevant Project Experience Ms. Folarin has developed several critical habitat designations for endangered and threatened species, as well as other ESA Section 4 documents such as 5 -year status reviews. She has also completed both formal and informal biological opinions under Section 7 of the ESA, implemented Habitat Conservation Plans in southern California under Section 10 of the ESA, and provided technical assistance to a variety of project proponents including private developers; the United States (U.S.) military; the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE); other federal, state and local government entities; and conservation organizations. Furthermore, Ms. Folarin's experience includes numerous site assessments for proposed installations to evaluate their potential impacts to federally -listed threatened and endangered species and development of avoidance and mitigation measures in compliance with the ESA, CEQA, and NEPA. Education MS, Biology, Arizona State University BS, Geology, University of Illinois Publications While Employed at the USFWS) Reclassification of Acmispon dendroideus var. traskiae (=Lotus d. subsp. traskiae) and Castilleja griseo as Threatened throughout Their Ranges: Final Rule — July 26, 2013. Designation of Critical Habitat for Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachelloe (Coachella Valley Milk - Vetch): Final Rule — February 13, 2013. Designation of Critical Habitat for Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachelloe: Proposed rule — August 25, 201 I. Final Revised Critical Habitat for Brodioea filifolia (Thread -Leaved Brodiaea) — February 8, 2011. 2 EBI Consulting A environmental I engineering I due diligence Ayoola Folarin Biologist 3703 Long Beach Boulevard Suite 421, 2nd Floor Long Beach. CA 90807 Mobile: 619.4058459 Final Rule Designating Critical Habitat for Ambrosia pumila (San Diego ambrosia) — November 30, 2010. Ambrosia pumila (San Diego ambrosia) 5 -Year Review — July 15, 20102. Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae (Coachella Valley Milk -Vetch) 5 -Year Review — September 1, 2009. Designation of Critical Habitat for Ambrosia pumila (San Diego ambrosia): Proposed rule — August 27, 2009. Astragalus mogdolenae var. peirsonii (Peirson's Milk -Vetch) 5 -Year Review — September 30, 2008. San Diego Fairy Shrimp (Bronchinecto sondiegonensis) 5 -Year Review — September 2008. Riverside Fairy Shrimp (Streptocephalus woottoni) 5 -Year Review — September 2008. Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for Astragalus mogdalenoe var. peirsonii (Peirson's Milk - Vetch) — February 14, 2008. Klaudia Mujaj From: Microsoft Outlook To: eldridge_naboa@fws.gov Sent Monday, June 22, 2020 10:46 AM Subject: Relayed: 6120001112 - LEILANI ESTATES, Pahoa, HI Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the destination server: eldridge naboa@fws.gov (eldridge naboa@fws.gov) Subject: 6120001112 - LEILANI ESTATES, Pahoa, HI VIII"Rq. 1 Klaudia Mujaj From: Microsoft Outlook To: dlnr@hawaii.gov Sent Monday, June 22, 2020 10:45 AM Subject: Relayed: 6120001112 - LEILANI ESTATES, Pahoa, HI Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the destination server: dInr@hawaii.cov (dlnr@hawaii.aovl Subject: 6120001112 - LEILANI ESTATES, Pahoa, HI APPENDIX C: HISTORIC RESOURCES REVIEW C3IIVEILN OR Or July 20, 2020 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION KAKUHIHEWA BUII. DING 601 KAMOKILA BLVD _ STE 555 KAPOLII 1-1119670' PORE 111 MAM.Dk IN REPLY REFER '1O: Makenzie Bandslra. Architectural Historian Log No. 2020.01221 EBI Consulting Doc. No. 20071)1407 6876 Susquehanna Trail South Archaeology York, PA 17403 mbar stra(iebiconsultinp.com Dear Ms. Bandstra: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) Section 106 Review — EBI Project 86120001112: AT&T HIL03345 — FA#10553982 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Pahoa, Hawaii County, Hawaii 96778 Request for Concurrence with "No historic properties Affected" Kehena Ahupua`a, Puna District, Island of Hawaii TMK: (3) 1-3-001:007 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SIIPD's) review of the subject AT&T telecommunication facility submittal. SHPD received this submittal from HBI Consulting on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC on May 27, 2020. The submittal indicates the project is subject to historic preservation review in accordance with both Section 106 of the National Historic Reservation Act (NHPA) and Hawaii Revised Statutes FIRS) Chapter 6E-42. The submittal included the following: Letter from EBI Consulting requesting historic preservation review and the State Historic Preservation Officer's (SHPO's) concurrence with the project effect dctcmmination FCC Foran 620 HRS 6E Submittal Filing Fee Form TMK Map, Permit Set and Photographs Report Titled: Cultural Resources Report in Support' ofAT&T's Cell Tower Project in Pahoa, Hmrof'1, 13- 3820 Pahoa Kalapana Rd. (HIL03345), TMK (3) 1-3-001:007 (portion) (Monahan, March 2020). Project Description: The project area comprises a 1,050 -sq. -II. portion of the 441.36 -acre properly. The project involves the construction of a new wireless telecommunications facility, in an undeveloped arca, at 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Pahoa, Hawaii. The installation of the 100 -ft. -tall monopole will include associated support equipment, a fenced compound lease area measuring 35 fi. by 30 ft. (1,050 sq. R.), and an overhead power connection. Ground disturbance will be limited to the 12 -1i. -wide access route and the proposed lease area_ AT&T is proposing to collocate 12 (8 ft.) AT&T panel antennas, 36 Remote Radio Units (RRUs), 6 DC9 surge suppressors, and 1 GPS antenna. Within the compound lease area, a 6 -11. -high chain-link fence will also be installed, along with a prefabricated equipment shelter. Additional equipment to he installed include a diesel backup generator, a 200A AC power panel, an Emerson power plant rack with 12 batteries, 2 hybrid racks, an H -frame with utility equipment, a cable bridge, power and fiber cable trunks, a transformer, and 2 DC12 surge suppressors. Ms. Makenzie Bandstrc July 20, 2020 Page 2 Findings: I'CP Hawaii, Ilk' completed a cultural resources study for the current project Their report (.Monahan, March 2020) indicates that no historic properties were identified in the project arca/Arca of Potential Effects (APE)_ Additionally. none were identified within a (.anile radius of project arca/APE. The project area/APL is located within Olaa cobbly hydrous loam (ash fields on `aa lava flows), 2 to 10 percent slopes (660) and Malama extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material (`da lava flows). 2 to 40 percent slopes (659)_ Based on previous archaeological studies of the surrounding area, the land -use history, and previous disturbance within the APElproject area, limited to low potential exists for significant historic properties to he present subsurface_ Concurrence: The SHPD concurs with determination ofAo Historic Properties Affected pursuant to LIAR §13-284-7(a)(1). The SHPO concurs with determination of No Historic Properties Affected pursuant to 36 CFR 800A(d)(I). Please contact David Buckley, Kauai Lead Archaeologist, at (808) 462-3225 or at David.Bucklcy(a)lhawaii.gov for any questions or concerns regarding this letter. Mahalo, Alan Downer Alan S_ Downer, PhD Administrator, State Historic Preservation Die Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer cc: Gory Johnson EBI cory.johnsongebiconsulting.com Anisa LaliI AT&T, a17161(nlatl.com Sean P. Naleimaile, SHPD, sean.p.naleimaile nhawaii.gov Barbara J. Lce, DLNR barbara.i.lee(802hawaii. grey 1 FCC Form 620 Notification Dale: 7AM EST 05/26/2020 The Number: 0009088553 FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau New Tower ("NT") Submission Packet General Information Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for public burden estimates 1) (Select only one) ( NE ) NE - New UA- Update of Application WD - Withdrawal of Application 2) If this application Is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number ofthe pending application currently on file. File Number: Applicant information 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0004979233 4) Name. AT&T Mobility, LLC Contact Name 5) First Name: Colleen 6)MI: B 7) Last Name: Thompson 8) Suffix: 9) Tile: 10) P.O. Box: OJ 11) Street Address: 1120 20th Street 12) City: Washington 13) State: DC 14) Zip Code: 20036 15) Telephone Number: (202)457-3020 16) Fax N mber 17) E-mail Address: cm7512iaft.com Consultant Information 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0016385759 19) Name: EnviroBusiness Inc. d/b/a EBI Consulting (EBI 6120001112) Principal Investigator 20) First Name: Cory 21) MI: 22) Last Name Johnson 23) Suffix: 24) Title: Architectural Historian nformation 25) PO_ Box: Aird 26) Street Address: 6876 Susquehanna Trail 5 27) City: York 28) State: PA 29) Zip Code. 17403 30) Telephone Number: (717)472-3070 31) Fax N mber. 32) E-mail Address: mbandstra©ebiconsulting.cOm of 11 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Professional Qualification 33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards? X )Yes ( ) No 34) Areas of Professional Qualification: Archaeologist X ) Architectural Historian Historian Architect Other (Specify) Additional Staff 35) Are there other staff Involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? X)Yee ( )No If "YES," complete the following: 36) First Name: Makenzie 37) MI: 38) Last Name: Bandstra 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification- Archaeologist X ) Architectural Historian Historian Architect Other (Specify) 36) First Name. Christopher 37) MI: M 38) Last Name: Monahan 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualifrcatlon: X ) Archaeologist Architectural Historian Historian Architect Other (Specify) 2 of 11 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Site Information Tower Construction Notification System 1) TCNS Notification Number: 204964 Site Information 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedned Treatment Under Program Comment: ( 1 Yes ( X } No 3) Site Name. LEILAM ESTATES / HIL03345 FA 10553982 4) Site Address: 43-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD 5) Detailed Desergtbn of Projccr Proposed construction of a new telecommunications monopole tower and compound resulting in ground disturbance. Please see Attachment 4 of thls filing for project design details. (6120001112) 6) City: Pahoa 7) State: 111 8) Zip Code: 96778 9) County/Borough/Pariah: HAWAII 10} Nearest Crossroads: PANDA KALAPANA RD AND KAMAIU RD 11) MAD 83 Latitude(PD-MMS$-sr 1926-23.8 ( X )Nor( )1 12) NAD &3 longitude (DO-N«M-SS.S) 154-56-42. ( )or( X ) W Tower Information 13) Tower height above ground level (include top -mounted attachments such as lightning rods): 30.5 Feet ( X ) Meters 14) Tower Type (Select One)'. Guyed latbee tower Self-supporting lattice X ) Monopole Other (Desc be): Project Status 15) Current Project Status (Select One), X 1 Construction has not yet commenced Construction has commenced, but is not completed Construction co wneneed on- Construction has been completed t.J' nstruchon commenced on: Construction completed on: 3 of 11 FCC Form S>_0 May 2014 etermination of Effect 14) Direct Effects (Select One): X ) No Historic Properties In Area of Potential Effects (APE) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE No Adverse Effect an Historic Properties in APE Adverse Effect an one or more Historic Properties in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select ane): X ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE of 11 FCC Form 620 May 2014 TribaI!NH O Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural A significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? X )Yes ( )No 9m Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 204964 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 1 Number of Tribes/NHOs: 02b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: TribeINHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Office of Hawaiian Affairs Contact Name 5) First Name: Anita 6) MI: C Last Name: Mangano 8) Suffix': 9) Tile: Compliance Enforcement Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted 04/23/2020 J( ) No Reply Replied/No Interest Replied/Have Interest Replied/Other 11) Date Replied 5 of 11 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted Tribe/NHO Information 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name. Contact Name 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title_ Contact Information 8) P.O. Box: IO rd 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code' 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax N mber: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: E-mail Letter Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted No Reply Replied/No Interest Replied/Have Interest Replied/Other 18) Date Replied 6 of 11 FCC Fonn 620 May 2014 roperties Identified Historic Properties 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or site cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? Yes(X )No at are of Yes(X )No 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? If'Yes`, you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. Yes (X ) No Historic Property 4) Property Name: 5) SHPO Site Number Property Address 6) Street Address: 7) City: 8) State: 9) Zip Code: 10) County/Borough/Parish: oe.ua o 1-.w1kla 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: Yes ( No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: Yes ( No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? Yes ( No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): No Effect on this Historic Property in APE No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): No Effect an this Historic Property in APE No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 7 of 11 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Local Government Involvement Local Government Agency 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN) 2) Name. County of Hawaii Planning Department Planning DivisionlCultural Resources Commission Contact Name 3) First Name: Alex 4) MI: 5) Last Name: Roy 6) Suffix: 7) Title: CLG Coordinator Contact Information 8) P0. Box: lord 9) Street Address: 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 10) City: Hilo 11) State: HI 12)Zip Code: 96720 13) Telephone Number (123)456-7890 14) Fax N mber: 15) E-mail Address: AIeX.roy@hawaiicoUnty.gov 16) Preferred means of communication: X ) E-mail Letter Both Dates 8 Response 17) Date Contacted 03/18/2020 I X ) Na Reply Replied/No Interest Replied/Have Interest Replled/Other 18) Date Replied Additional Information 19) Information on local government's role or Interest (optional): If of 11 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Other Consulting Parties Contacted Other Consulting Parties 1) Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? Consulting Party X )Yes ( )No 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: Hawaiian Historical Society Contact Name 4) First Name: Ronald 5) MI- 6) Last Name: Williams 7) suffix: Jr 8) Title: 9) P.O. Box: And/Or 10) Street Address: 560 Kawaiahao Street 11) City: Honolulu 12) State: HI 13) Zip Code' 96813 14) Telephone Number: (805)537-6271 15) Fax N tuber'. 16) E-mail Address: hhsoffice@hawaiianhistory.org 17) Preferred means of communication: X ) E-mail Letter Both ates S Response 18) Date Contacted 03/18/2020 X ) No Reply Replied/No Interest Replied/Have Interest Replied/Other 19) Date Replied Additional Information 20) Information on other consulting parties' role or interest (optional): 9 of 11 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Designation of SHPOITHPO 1) Designate the Lead State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) based on the location of the tower. SHPO/THPO Name: State Historic Preservation Office You may also designate up to three additional SHPOs/fHPOs if the APEs include multiple states. If the APEs include other countries. enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provindal Historic Preservation Agency. SHPOITHPO Name: SHPOITHPO Name'. SHPO/THPO Name: Certification I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 620 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete. Party Authorized to Sign First Name: Makenzie MI: Last Name: Bandstra Suffix: Signature Makenzie Bandstra Date: 05/22/2020 FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID. WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (US. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 10 0f11 FCC Faun 620 May 2014 Attachments : Type Description Date Entered ResumesNitae Attachment t 05/22/2020 Photographs Attachment 2, 05/22/2020 Map Documents Attachment 3 05/22/2020 Additional Site Information Attachment 4 05/22/2020 Area of Potential Effects Attachment 5 0522/2020 Tribal/NHO Involvement Attachment 6 05/22/2020 Misted° Properties for Direct Effects Abashment'' 05/22/2020 Historic Properties for Visual Effects Attachment S 05/222020 Local Government Involvement Abaahment.8 05/22/2020 Public Involvement Attachment 11 05/2212020 State -Specific Forms Abashment 11 05/22/2020 Marti FCC Form (2s May 2014 NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Attachment I. Consultant Information Provide a current copy of the resume or curriculum vitae for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions presented in this filing. The resume for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions are presented in this submission. Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553962 FCC Form 620 Sig EBI Consulting A environmental !engineering 1 due diligence Cory Johnson Architectural Historian Houston, TX 77096 Mobile: 219.3135458 Summary of Experience Cory Johnson, Architectural Historian has extensive experience in Historic Preservation since 2014. Before joining EBI Consulting in 2017, Cory worked as a preservation planner for the City of Houston, Texas and also worked as a project assistant with Indiana Landmarks in Gary, Indiana. He is skilled in historic preservation research, architectural documentation, planning and photography. Cory's background includes a Masters of Science in Historic Preservation from Ball State University, and a Bachelors in Fine Arts from Indiana University Northwest. During his past three years in the professional field he has developed a passion for participating in and watching projects go from preliminary meetings to the finished products. This connection with projects is something that Cory strives to build his career on. Cory is a dedicated and enthusiastic individual, who is committed to the field of historic preservation. Relevant Project Experience Reviewed applications and prepared staff reports for Certificates of Appropriateness to present to monthly historical commission meetings. Has researched and wrote landmarks reports. Conducted survey and fieldwork for potential historic districts and sites. Photographed and developed marketing material for monthly preservation magazine. Education Bachelor of Fine Arts — Indiana University Northeast, 2005-2010 Master of Historic Preservation — Ball State University, 2012-2014 agAEBI Consulting environmental i engineering I due diligence Makenzie Bandstra Architectural Historian 6876 Susquehanna Trail South York, PA 17403 Phone: 717A72 3070 SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Makenzie Bandstra, Architectural Historian, has extensive experience in Cultural Resource Management since 2010. She meets the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards as specified in 36 CFR Part 61 for both History and Architectural History. She has extensive knowledge of American history, architectural history, and historic preservation gained through experience and education. She has worked in positions at both the local and state level of government, gaining substantial experience in the administration of historic preservation law. Upon completing her undergraduate degree, she worked as a Program Assistant in the City of Pittsburgh's Historic Preservation Office. As a graduate student, she successfully completed an internship with the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation and the Pennsylvania State Historic Preservation Office. She has conducted extensive historical research and prepared documentation for resources in the Mid -Atlantic Region. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Extensive knowledge of National Register criteria, process, and guidelines Experience in preparing National Register of Historic Places nominations Experience in completing state level recordations Experience working with a Certified Local Government (CLG) Experience in city planning and command of zoning and building code regulations Experience in design review and assessing effects of alterations to historic properties Experience working in a State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Experience in conducting field surveys Skilled in conducting extensive archival research and interpreting primary and secondary sources Skilled in applying the Secretary of the Interior's Standards Trained in Section 106 and Section 4(f) Experience in National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance documentation EDUCATION 2013 M.A. Applied History, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania, Shippensburg, PA 2010 B.A. History of Art & Architecture, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 2010 Certificate in Historic Preservation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS National Trust for Historic Preservation CHRISTOPHER M. MONAHAN, PH.D. PRESIDENT, FOUNDER TCP HAWAII, LLC 150 Hamakua Dr., #810, Kailua, Hawaii 96734 808) 754-0304 mookahan@gmail.com EDUCATION Ph.D. & M.A. in Anthropology (Archaeology Section), University of Wisconsin -Madison (1991, 1996) B.A. in Anthropology (Archaeology Concentration), St. Lawrence University, Canton, New York (1986) WORK HISTORY (SELECTED) Sole Proprietor, TCP Hawaii, LLC, Kailua, Hawai`i (2006 -present) I founded a research/consulting company based in Hawaii dedicated to conducting cultural resource and historic preservation studies including work on Hawaiian Archaeology, History and Culture. TCP Hawaii specializes in community relations andconsultaton with Native Hawaiian organizations and individuals, government agencies, large landowners, developers, and trusts. We have completed many projects for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) and Bishop EstateiKamchameha Schools, among others. We conduct all types of Archaeological and Burial Treatment studies for regulatory & non - regulatory undertakings; we also conduct Cultural Impact Assessments & Ethno-historical studies. 1 have appeared before island burials councils on Oahu, Maui and Hawaii; I have testified as an expert witness before the Land Use Commission (LUC) in Honolulu. Principal Investigator/Project Manager, Cultural Surveys Hawaii, Inc., Kailua, Hawaii (2009-2012) I managed cultural resource projects in Hawaii, including a S5 million contract for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers consisting of 25 individual projects, and for other public agencies and private clients. 1 authored dozens of reports on historic preservation, archaeological and cultural resource issues. I managed staff of 6-S individuals, including professionals, administrators and support staff One of my primary roles and responsibilities was to maintain Quality Assurance/ Quality Control and oversee all aspects of project management. Principal Investigator/Project Manager, SWCA, Inc., Portland, OR (2008-2009) 1 worked as a Principal Investigator/Project Manager for SWCA—my roles and responsibilities were essentially the same as those descrrbed above for CSH. A major project completed at SWCA, in cooperation with OHA and the U.S. Army, was a critical re -analysis of archaeological surveys conducted by previous firms on Stryker -related projects. Oahu Island Lead Archaeologist and Acting Branch Chid SHPD/DLNR, Honolulu (2006) Conducted site visits and investigations on 0`ahu Island—including burial sites and inadvertent discoveries—to ensure compliance with historic preservation laws and rules Served as liaison between Native Hawaiians and other concerned parties, developers, archaeological firms, government agencies, politicians, activists, and others Advocated for the rights of locals, including Native Hawaiians, in the historic preservation process, to the extent that the laws and rules allow Consulted with archaeological contractors, developers, government agencies, and private landowners on O`ahu, regarding their historic preservation obligations and responsibilities Authored approximately 450 historic -preservation project reviews, mostly for Oahu Island 1 of 5 (Monahan resume Oct 2017) WORK HISTORY (SELECTED), continued' Archaeologist, Project Director, Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu (2003-2005) Authored dozens of archaeological reports on Oahu, Maui, Kauai, and Hawaii islands Appeared before the Island Burial Councils on several occasions Conducted docent training (pro bond work), Kauai Museum, Lbu`c Lecturer, University of Hawaii-Manoa, Department ofAnthropology (2002-2003) Courses included "Humanity Emerging" (an introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology), Introduction to Physical Anthropology," "Introduction to Archaeology," "Seminar in Lithic Analysis" Forensic Archaeologist, U.S. Army Central Identification Laboratory, Honolulu, HI (2001-2002) Conducted recovery/excavation of human skeletal retrains of U.S. military servicemen from Vietnam- and World War II -era sites in Laos, Vietnam, Papua Ncw Guinea, and Kiribati Case work (osteological examination) in U.S. military forensic studies Conducted public presentations and trainings OTHER RELEVANT WORK AND TEACHING EXPERIENCE (SELECTED) Adjunct Assistant Professor (2004-2006), University of Maine, Machias, ME (Anthropology) Taught "Introduction to Physical Anthropology" (on -lint classroom) High School Teacher (2000-2001), Perspectives Chartcr School, Chicago, IL, Social Studies Designed and implemented a Social Studies curriculum for 9-12 graders in Chicago Focused on issues of self -empowerment, civil and human rights, and alternative histories Lecturer (1998-2000), Loyola University, Chicago, IL, Department of Anthropology Taught "Human Origins" (an introduction to Physical Anthropology and Archaeology) Instructor (1997-1999, summers), Rutgers University, Koobi Fora Field School, Kenya, East Africa Taught Field Methods in Paleolithic Archaeology and Physical Anthropology Visiting Assistant Professor (1996-1997), The George Washington Univ., Department of Anthropology Courses: "Introduction to Biological Anthropology," `Paleolithic Archaeology," Graduate Seminar `Biological Anthropology," Seminar "Archaeology of Hunan Origins" Visiting Student(Pre-Doctoral) Internship (1994-1996); Smithsonian Institution, Anthropology Conducted experimental archaeology Research included Scanning Electron Microscopy Dissertation (1993-1994), National Museum of Kenya, Pakontobgy & Archaeology Divisions Fieldwork included ethnoarchaeology (living with various ethnic groups) in Kenya Laboratory analyses of million -year-old fossils from Olduvai Gorge and Koobi Fora Assistant Field Supervisor (1991); excavations at Gilman Falls, ME, University of Maine Fieldwork included work with the Passamaquoddy tribe of Maine Teaching Assistant (1990-1991), University of Wisconsin -Madison (Department of Anthropology) Assistant Field Supervisor(1990); excavations al Neolithic Cave, Fontbreguoua, Provence, France Field Technician (1987-1989); excavation and survey, various companies and agencies, Maine Field Technician (1984-1985); survey in southwestern Kenya on Neolithic -Age sites 2 of 5 (Monahan resume Oct 2017) PEER -REVIEW PUBLICATIONS Monahan, C.M. (1999a). Comparing apples and oranges in the Plio-Pleistocene. Journal ofHuman Evolution 37: 789-792. Monahan, C.M. (19996). Quantifying bone modification by African wild dogs and spotted hyenas. Journal of Human Evolution 36:A14. Monahan, C.M. (1998). The Hadza carcass transport debate revisited and its archaeological implications. Journal of Archaeological Science 25:405-424. Monahan, C.M. (1996). New zooarchacological data from Bed II, Oiduvai Gorge, Tanzania: implications for hominid behavior in the Early Pleistocene. Journal ofHuman Evohuion 31:91-128. Pobiner, B.L., Rogers, M.J., Monahan, C.M. & Harris, J.W.K. (2008). New evidence for Honrinin carcass processing strategies at 1.5 Ma, Koobi Fora, Kenya. Journal ofHuman Evolution 55:103-130. Rogers, M., Monahan, C.M. et al. (1999). New discoveries of hominid -modified bones from the Koobi Fora Formation, Kenya. Journal ofHuman Evolution 36: A 18. Byrd, B. & Monahan, C.M. (1995). Death, mortuary ritual, and Natufian social structure. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 14:251-287. PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATIONS (SELECTED) Variability in Traditional Planting Strategies as Illustrated by the Kona (Kahalu`u) Field System" (October 2015). Society for Hawaiian Archaeology annual meeting Mr' e, Kauai (w. Rose Runyon Thurman & Doug Thurman). Continuity and Change at a Pu`uone Fishpond: New Archaeological Data from Lokoea, Kawailoa, Oahu" October 2013), Society for Hawaiian Archaeology annual meeting, Honolulu (with Doug Thurman). A Functional and Temporal Interpretation of Excavated Piss in the Mauna `Rina (Pohakuloa Training Area) and Their Significance in Hawaiian Prehistory" (October 2012), Society for Hawaiian Archaeology annual meeting, Keauhou, Hawaii. New Archaeological and Experimental Data on Functional Interpretations of Excavated Pits at Pohakuloa Training Arca, Hawaii Island" (October 2010), Society for Hawaiian Archaeology annual meeting, Kaua`i Stemming the Tide in the Hawaiian Islands: Impacts of Sea -level Rise on Cultural Resources" (July 2008), 6'h World Archaeological Conference, Dublin, Ireland (with co-author Dr. Michael Kimball). New Directions in Historic Preservation in Hawai`i: The Traditional Cultural Properties Paradigm" (July 2006), QueenEmma Hawaiian Civic Club, Honolulu. Traditional Cultural Properties in Hawai`i" (June 2006), University of Hawaii-Manoa, East-West Center, for an audience comprised of U.S. Fish and Wildlife biologists and land managers. Archaeological Issues in Section 106 Compliance in Hawaii" (May 2006), Federal Office Building, Honolulu, for an audience comprised of Federal Housing and Urban Development (HUD) contractors. Trcannent of Human Remains on Non -Federal Lands: Laws, Rules, and Practice" (April 2006), JPAC/CIL, Hickam Air Force Base, to an audience of forensic anthropologists. A View from Both Sides of the Fence: Why a Graduate Degree Does Matter in CRM, and Why CRM. Should Matter in Academia" (Fall 2004), Society for Hawaiian Archaeology annual meeting Kaihua-Kona. Variability in the Foraging Behavior of Homo Erectus" (Fa112003), Society for Hawaiian Archaeology annual meeting, Kane`ohe, Oahu. Forensic Anthropology at the USA-CILH1" (March 2002), to ROTC Cadets, UH-Manoa, Honolulu. From 1994 and 2000, 1 delivered approximately a dozen scientific papers at annual meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, American Association of Physical Anthropology, and Paleoanthropology Society. 3 of5 (Monahan resutne Oct 2017) INVITED PUBLIC LECTURES (HONORARIA) St. Lawrence University, Canton, New York (March 2000), `Two Million Years of African Prehistory." Rutgers University- New Jersey (March 2000), "New Perspectives in the Archaeology of Human Origins." Tulane University, New Orleans (May 2000), "Human Origins." Facing History and Ourselves (Educational Non -Profit Organization), "Integrating the Principles of a Disciplined Life into High School Teaching," Chicago (March2001). AWARDS AND GRANTS Dissertation Improvement Grant, National Science Foundation (1992-1993) Visiting Student Internship, Department of Anthropology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (1994-1995) Travel Awards to present papers at national conferences,University of Wisconsin, George Washington University, and Loyola University (1995-2000) ORGANIZED CONFERENCE While a Pre -doctoral Intern at the Smithsonian (see above), I organized a 5-weekpubhc lecture series on New Directions in Neanderthal Research; invited speakers: Dan Lieberman (Harvard University), Curtis Marean (Arizona State University), John Shea (SUNY -Stony Brook), Steve Churchill (Duke), and Jamie Shreeve (National Geographic Society). HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRAINING (SELECTED) Introduction to Section/06;National Preservation Institute Workshop (3/02), Honolulu; instructor: Tom King NEPA Compliance: National Preservation Institute Workshop (9/04), Honolulu; instructor: Claudia Nissley Historic Structures Reports:National Preservation Institute Workshop (3/05), Phoenix; instructor: Alfonso Narvaez Consultation with Native American Tribes, a 2 -day workshop/conference (11/08), Suquamish Indian Tribe's Clearwater Casino Resort, Washington state Hawai`i Departmentof Transportation NEPA training (3/11), UH East-West Center, Honolulu Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, Section 106 intensive/advanced training (10/11), Waikild OTHER RELEVANT EXPERIENCE AND INTERESTS From 1984-1999, 1 traveled to East Africa on several occasions, staying from se%eral months up to a year, conducting research, living with native people in Kenya (Maasai, Sambuu, Abaluyha, Swahili). 1 was fluent in Kiswahili at this time. 1 climbed (the 17,000 ft.) Mount Kenya in 1985. In 1984, I traveled to Alaska to work on a fishing boat for the summer, at which time 1 worked and traveled with native (Inuit) people I met along the way. From 2000 -present. I have conducted several solo camping excursions lasting from 1-2 weeks into the wild, mountain outbacks of New Mexico, Arizona, and Maui Most recently, I have become interested and active in describing and documenting Traditional Cultural Properties (TCP) as a means of preserving landscapes and natural resources. I am currently studying the Hawaiian language with Associate Professor Kahikahealani Wight, Kapi olani Community College, Honolulu. 4 of 5 (Monahan resume Oct 2017) PROFESSIONAL REFERENCES 1. Tom Schnell, Planner, PBR Hawaii & Associates: tschnell rupbrhawaii.com; 521-5631 2. Jason Jeremiah, Cultural Resources Manager, Kamehameha Schools; jajeremi:ksbe.edu; 541-5376 3. Susan Lebo, Archaeology Branch Chief, Hawaii State Historic Preservation Division; Susan.A.Lebo ighawaiigov; 692-8015 4. Derek Fransz, PE, Pacific Energy Solutions; DFras a,ecc.net; 792-8012 5 of 5 (Monahan resume Get 2017) NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB30604039 See instructions for public burden estimares Attachment 2. Site Information - Photographs You are required to provide photographs and maps as part of this filing. Additional site information can be provided in an optional attachment. Photograph Requirements: Except in cases where no Historic Properties were identified within the Areas of Potential Effects. submit photographs as described below. Photographs should be in color, marked so as to identify the project, keyed to the relevant map or text, and dated; the foal length of the lens and the height of the camera should be noted. The source of any photograph included but not taken by the Applicant or its consultant (including copies of historicimages) should be identified on the photograph. a. Photographs taken from the collocation site should show views from the proposed location in all directions. The direction (e.g., north, south, etc.) should be indicated on each photograph, and, as a group. the photographs should present a complete (360 degree) view of the area around the communications tower or non -tower structure. b. Photographs of all listed and eligible properties within the Areas of Potential Effects. c. If any listed or eligible properties are visible from the proposed collocation site, photographs looking at the site from each historic property. The approximate distance in feet (meters) between the site and the historic property should be included. if any lined or eligible properties are within the APE, photos looking at eachhistoricpropertyshouldbeincluded. Include aerial photos of the APE for visual effects, if available, There are a variety of publicly available websites that provide aerial photographs. Photographs are located in Attachment 7 within the Cultural Resources Report, taken on February 7, 2020 by Momi Wheeler, B.A., Archaeologist, under the direct supervision of Chris Monahan, Ph.D., Principal Investigator (SOI qualified) of TCP Hawaii, LLC. Applianis Name: AT&T Mobility. LLC Project Name: LEILANI ESTATES Project Number: H1103345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Attachment 3. Site Information - Map Requirements Include one or more 7.5 -minute quad USGS topographical maps that: a. Identify the Areas of Potential Effects for both Direct and Visual Effects. If a map is copied from the original, include a key with name of quad and date. b. Show the location of the proposed collocation site and any new access roads or other easements including excavations. c. Show the locations of each property fisted. d. Include keys for any symbols, colors, or other identifiers. e. Submit color maps whenever possible. The following maps are attached to this report Street Map (Figure 1) Topographic Map (Figure 2) Aerial Photograph (Please see the Map within the Archaeology Report within Attachment 7) Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 f y + i— 0 O. 1 1 / 1 ! ! N 1 t i t t * t 1 1 t 1 ‘ I f 1 \ / 1 1 N . y y J r J s Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin. USGS, Intermap. INCREMENT P, NRCansri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea. Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) p, OpenStreetMap contributors. and the GIS User Community Legend Project Site Site Radius at 250', 500', 1000' and 1/2 mile Date 2;3'2020 Figure 1: Site Location Map I(,.J3345 FA 10553982 LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 PN: 6120001112 EBI Consulting A environmental I engineering I design Legend Project Site Site Radius at 250', 500', 1000' and 1/2 mile Date: 2/3/2020 Figure 2 - Topographic Map HIL03345 FA 10553982 LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 PN: 6120001112 aiAenvironmental I engineering j design N EBI Consulting NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Attachment 4. Site Information — Additional Site Information Additional Site Information Recommendations: Describe any additional structures, access roads, utility lines, fences, easements, or other construction planned for the site in conjunction with the proposed wireless telecommunication facility. Use this attachment to provide additional details needed to present a full and accurate description of any construction activities that will take place to complete the installation. The Subject Property, located at 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Rd., Pahoa, Hawaii County, HI 96778, is situated within a predominantly rural neighborhood. The proposed tower location is in an undeveloped area adjacent to an access road off the main (Pahoa Kalapana) road. AT&T Mobility, LLC proposes the installation of a 100 -foot monopole tower, and associated support equipment located within an approximately 35 -foot by 30 -foot lease area. Access will be gained via a 1 2 -foot wide easement along the existing asphalt -paved driveway on the west side of Pahoa Kalapana Road. Utilities will be routed within a proposed 5 -foot wide utility/fiber easement from the proposed facility along the paved driveway. Please see the attached drawings for complete details. Site Plans/Lease Exhibits provided by AT&T Mobility, LLC are included in this attachment. Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 e n CODE COMPLIANCE PROMPT, LEGAL D6143. 119N: NEW BUILD LTE ONLY 1C: MRSDL021465 c TREP ARM TOR AT& T MO RANIV A. A. 3111... TONAL NIRA. w.. T mD USID: 14101 1 FA CODE: 10553982 APPROVEDL...-. M E 55.... A+ 9 M. M7) AT& T SITE NUMBER: HIL03345 SITE NAME: LEILANI ESTATES SITE TYPE: MONOPOLE/ SHELTER ADDRESS: 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 TMK: ( 3) 1- 3- 001: 007 ALL WON AND RMEERIALE THAI IF PEgd5ED AND WAILED N ACCORDANCE MTN 1K C IRRstt MOONS o, TK Fo1LOwNG CODA AS 0E3 CC R. ENE LOCA (, o. PM. NG AVUpPITE3. NdI. Nt7 N 616E PUNS 6 EO EE CONSTM/ 10 / 0 RRMI NOON NolcoNFo 7ANG TO T ( S( caEz 2006 NE9LNASONAI MIE C IAI( WRN LOCAL MENDNE,^. FRE PROEIC9OSOCNt1ON (. PAI I 231S . RRA IONNM DUO, CON SCINA ON CODE PP* OVE°-- R-.--. 1n—' sI. N: RASTRUCTURe R1/ ALA 1AOA. ARENO, STE917 1A ) E1ULIAV. ! AWN 96613 10ro,: 104 - AfAT UN 0: H1103345 PROJECT TEAM VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION ArP• Y, wM_:. ESSEF f11[ ACggR1OT1 w I \ nw R \ In 1w.. MO F. LA1ps • Ae ,;;._ L '= 4mR ( Ht.. n BIG ISLAND OF HAWAII Z IPOP SRE114009 AN1Nl. MNTEDIEECOMWERCAEONS ACUTE. OW36RRG1 ADE HOLT TAUCNNC tOEI( R/ ALANMfOR II N0* U. 19X) P101 ( 4OQIT, 8M- AT. 11 TALL w NSIAUA910NOR 1171 ATM HRAi1A76NNwS w MIAUATOPI d ITsi 431* A1dE RANO ( P11T RR! 37 r NSGWTgN C. NI DC A SURGE SUARESSCMI3 r NSIAUACN09111 CRS ANT/ MA R I FN11 0N109 AN' AnP 3s0 R 300, 110A. SOFT 1 ml[ GdMT1Mt: AM( k1 CCAVOX1N0LEASE NEA w NSIAWn0T10, 6' 4 HIGH GREEN CHAN IRA• o4c PIGW/ GRFFH R PR VAC f SAAR r NS? ALLATONCI III PROAIRCAIE0 E0UPMRIT SHELTER w ............ III DIAL RAC RYP GENERATOR w NSIAUADON d 111702A AC POWER^ ANE r NSTAlUTON d IT EMERSON POKER RAM RACK W/ 1121 roe. •" rte / Armies 0 , q- . 11AWTIoN 0, 171 NASD PACRI Wd L NSIANDN 111 HtoJRAAE W/ UnEOUtNlpll Y• NSIAWIION OF NICOLE w IgNROW' R196_ CAKE MEWS NSIAIVd l w NSIAUATTON 0, 13 OCIR SURGE sume3S091 wm. e. R ACR w 7..•. 44x nC N_• fU II ATILT ALw; 9* A NRARRCMIE RARENESS SID UPfLU AVENUE CdTKTO0Aw1C ODdR ALAN. HI . 4.... DAAL00.. cao4plR. olcom PT9110BI 673. 1070 CCNSMC ION WHACK EMI P990W M4NA0R: HO 06, 7!, 1. S RE. n Num. NORM TN NAM/ Iv Lou [ OT Iv ;; AT DESCMIAT•/ CONTACT: DANNY ON? t9SO9 CONTACT VARE33A METER MULL. DD397OATT. 000A bAA1.. 92MSQlcorn PH: ISOM07OR3( 41 M: IT01 METRO RI FNGNFFIT. 7dlG: ATL! MD6NFY LS NLPASTRUCTURE PARTNERS CONTACT CIEM NARM , IdASON ATA OOACY mo LN ENGINEERENGWAIL gbYinEsn0310tom AHL CE!] 12/ dttaMn : WS SUMO Plt LOA 6274, 20O w6CNTECT/ ENGINEER, PROM, MANAGER ELLARsor 7SPI131. 3. 411E1PARITRI ANRATNCTRE PKRIRS 111001: 406E AL MIRANDA COMAC T RICE NOVA IRnat 9PRvlee90. 0 4e.. ENL 6rw. RRIPOrpo . l PRR 1901247-) 67 PER R) 1131 747 SITE INFORMATION GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEET INDEX REV. PROPERTY OWKROO SANFdD3 SFRVKE CENTER IN[; 1 A2BXEAAUIIAHOA. 0 PAPA. HI% 716 IURISDC ION COUNTY Of HAWAII WIND LOADS: MEAN SS4ICONDGUSTI MOUSE CATEGORY: C SEISWC TONE: I 1L00070NE: Y 1RAR .' ( 411. 3001 SOY TONING: AGRICULTURE AO - A70 LAIE0* 1n60* 34 E.• L 21PICN6 LONGETOE MAD RT: IRS 2A17/ gw9 w( X. 6fY. EY I[ G6t IS / Aeon UE•. IAPNFD FCNRATE. IT fALT. NOTA: N THESE PLANS ARE RpHAAT1FD TO IS FULL STE A13. X 36'. CONTRA - MRS SMALL USW ALL TINTS ANO COEOti( N6 ON 13014 SIT AND SHALL RNAEOAIRY NOTPY EM AR(: ( 14 MAEPMVKN RI WRITING OF ANY 9ISCREPAK: IES BOOMS PTOCHtXNTG 111 TE wrDRXdAAtF41A ORDERS OP of RESPCNL1f !( M IK SAM[ FOCAL( 4RAWNO3 OREC10FOCNLO AMORE. 713) IERUANAO A A. ARO.. 96720 I HEAONORiNWFSTd AIRPORT RO/ IINUAIAOA SI IOwNDALOl051 7 1Ufr1LEFT OMO HLIIAIAWAR IEIIRO/ KAKHIENVAAVE 3 COWRIES tO FpuOw N- 11/ NAWN EEO La WIEN 2 TAW TO OM 1310MO 1413)/ REAAU PAIOA BYPASS RD 1 C0. 1NIT 10 PO11OW 11- 13D 1. 1 TIRE SHEET W I (: HlPAI Nr,) 1E3 rN1 364 K8NAtA I SIVE RAN 7 ENARGED SRF PUN & C0WOUND PLAN A3 ANIEMA4[ OUI MDIIPUN 161MATONS HIL033 IEttAN ESTATES OTR: TwMARALAPANA RD PAHOA. M ROTS TAX- 1311 30011707 GENERAL NOTEST. 3D/ NOA RTPASS RD 6. AT THE IPA/ EC CRCLA. CCRIVERE ORATORS ( 299091 P GOPIIR1UE roFOLLOV/ MID A• 140 AND NOT FOR HIIMANHNITARON A T90. NHENC10I WIT WiN Elf ELS TACLR. 0IPM AS ROUSED FOR ROVINI MAPHE ANC! STE PROACT W U. POT MAT N ANL ION/ CAW DA: MANCE OR ENECI O. ORVAG(: N0 SMRARI SEWE. SRVCE . 01A1E WOES_ d RASH DEAOEA R RIOi. RO AND VC O:: Y• M• HCAL 9GHAGE I P• CP05FD IURNlGIRR* RCL: USAGE ROAD 10. OESRRA( q• W6L RE OHNE row SPA8 NOT MOOED / O* 1RRA. N. ARRATON APO Orly RPECUFNRT S9m0 MRAANIENANC( PFOONA AC 130. 106 NET MOORED PER IC 700. SICITON I1032• IIOIRMOR I9AR71 TO' MROwN( R: AiAI POLAR AGENCY: HUCO RIDS 99iON. ', NAI REPNONE Ati' NCT. HAWAIAIN I( 1/ CONI OATL UPDAmO 07/ 77/ 19 STATEMENTS IT«•... TITLE SHEET 3t1W fi} AIANNL17611. OIWIIIN NE SCOPE OF TAR( CCMIAPRONRUS p. WNG% ser, ROR ANALY360F E9TN0 AND/ CS PROPOSED COA* CN ! NES. NEER 10 SRUCTRA A19AYS0 MEOWED USDA SEPARATE COLO. At PAOUNI ANOF LESE MOU15Nor905N1Tw1THE ( 511) 0 NX0OPR POSEDCONONNENTS T. 9( 9 Xt. POP ANAlY160/ Md1M MSIKORE EAEMGAPOpRPR0105EOCOMPONINR. EOR 10 NN3MA640ASSTRUC1URAl ANALYSE PROVIDED UNDER WARNE COVER. DI ; ; T 800- 227- 2600 Cal ) 1.S84An7014r. n AR. u..-. M. I W:. Twl alaltal. C2111Plaaa PI taaaataa app.), gap, = pal Ppaaaalatt laalattaatat at< a ay... KA aft Palatal Paata & Attar atatatliaa ae aa pallatt alta IC taaat apelatattala aloa PO a al I atal Nap aplaPlark Fall far Pala... lattalti IC MINEI/ 190 • AvaRovN AIM TI an laall / Malta talltpan • a LOC tataal at*, lataaataga Rai attltatt llailltalataaXillIG „ pp,, laaa MO Malta aeotap all eta, apa aalletal Zia. aaPaC t.. atala Calla ClatalECICIalCal GT 55 CEaCe2A PlCalaallaErt ao De t oni VALE Jalapa Ern. all at& Paall4 tap!. 15 IflA a Al tlEaORT at a pax a, at TOSURal apUIRC alaqalOaallaatlialla MIAMIANllapala la PETAL aktanal a, PlatEaaak taPa fa 6C741ralalltlall Mall at alatatal Pat Waal, aracat 41. Eattall al laalt la. ata Layattat. Ala la Tatala PlartGEXTEROI Cr Maar, aka rtoOP pa Walla! FIX a pal la tail ltRal AT& T 115AL ,, TR,_„,. HIL03345 tett us 0 Am GENERAL NOT AT& T AT& T MOBILITY Amain moKwulmou DANGER NO TRESPASSINGI NOTICE AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY DANGER) ANGER) DIESEL FUEL LEAD ADALATDAIES NO SMOKING NO OPEN FLAMES NO SMOKING INFORMATION MIAM . 4. 10M C in FM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Properly of AT& T Authorized Personnel Only P operty of AT& T Authorized Personnel Only ATSTI LPun muff sma. A. rava.. oni• noiEnra coArr4G 114 LAM [ MA SE PMDF MIL GRIMM MAIMMOM LIMO." n* MIIM MISIMMISMM MEIW II II/ MMI 001. 4MOOMIMMIM OF DILAM WARNING tkyom nth Polmpw TI gcanImans xeccd Inc RI CAUTION Beyond This Pmnrya are entering Lconotlict arr. and pone NOTICE uwnd Ibis eoWMpv nm cnonng In + runner. I. WILY em PIC IDES MEMO I. IM AIM a0. 7ms PRIPME AT& T HIL03345 EMI OM HIL03345 ROLM MARS MIM HI 98IIS M MI MI SITE SIGNAGE GN - 2 eor 4 eoq q Paax , c t / / yNq_\ / % y / a l IR 4\ / EEEEEEE AT& T SS , R; na me HIL03345 I° PROPOSED AT& T PROJECT AREA isears• f REFER TO ENLARGED eTE PLAN ON SHEETA2 0 F q / 2 f e Q. PAK',( 3) 3- 031, 307 r/ Y x$ c h ay yexn. nw a e. lo 3 PO V A\^ o 9O Y3 2e N4 4 ria% 6 \ NUt4N1t 7 a. m.°,[ m, J_ ie' i HIL03345 Mara rnxwwepm131701 WI ono A 1 SITE PLAN - - I`. I, r 1%., 05, wD. , , n, m rvapw r .. I l AT&TmT r -- - NO rr HI[ 433d5 r_ 1 amM. P 3si a 1 r t 11 I}/,... r- liwo: j m i ,• 4 e1 wnfruII C I • , P5..... 9`. 1....,_. m C„„. , p - IP' . x,„. 1. i- 1- Hi1033b5 Fn. lueur¢ PAHOA KALAPANA PCAD 1 EIttARGNLRIVNLLUNOUNMM.)tl q, l A• ie+ ix ecarame l COMPOUND PL AN -' rues— i2 a EM ARvED SPE MAN V: m - a : o S i-; i= ApE1% OPSANIEMIANTED TO OGERLOR OE SMELTER 18) WAG ENO. TIP. BIER TO MANUFACTURERDRAWINGS PM APED FOR SAT& T MK Of IU AVENUE AYK AN. NI NmP E I. ALL IPI CAZWG Ate EQUIPMENT MUST RE INSTALLED AROUSED N ACCORDANCE WNW PRODUCTSNCAIAEDINGRECIONSLBING ANCNOR LAEEtNG QEOUIRDAEMS. PER NEC SECTION 1102481. 2. µLIP( CAKE* CONFORMS PAM ANOIS TOW NSTALLED PER NEC 356. 108 3..• 5 12. 1 MI ARE SUKCAED AND STAGCCRFO TO FA I. ALL IPJ ANEMIAS. EQUIPMENT. COAX. AND ACCPSR518S MOUNTED TORTE IP). 0NOP/ X8 SHAGS( PANTO GRETN. S. 171 . o087 8 SMALL BE PAINTED GREE! va„ _ C iiti+.. . , . . . . 4/) ALA MOANA ELM DE 917 Ni) NXIdY. W. WM96813nwawlerontlu I% PIPEE% T9610N, _ S M. ' TOTALS] T`ill GIESGN EY OmE80J IT) ANTENNA 0. 80088 k. 4(' ` \ MOUNIEIG FRAME T „` J) L4" T ) C.1•", \ CI Lo- n.:`/ r.•,'! Y . e. // % y A D/ ; .. d - • Lit , A/ j\)\ pY L 5 `,,.+{ C--- 1 f%' Arar lona NGN MONOPL% E tie k. I IPI GENERATOR RIR 800 REEL ALARM PANEL 161'"^:: I t a I AC E8N# SON. 48Y POWER PLANIRACRW( H RECTIFIERS1ARIERIra STRINGS 1ryREA7O72 7' a5t Y IPIFM2.. 13 AIN SUPPffiSSPJN S73EMw I e y I I DE 180ANBANERIES111OGI2SLIRGESUPPRESSOR WENN RACE, ITOTAL3J III CARIE ENTRY, M. AT& T Sit• O: HIL03345 IPI . W ACGENET9RA05 w; IIBGALLGN IAN( i AC I in RAIX RfXAL-? J I% 11146. OBASERAND NRI wiR01 WOW RACK IPI RRE E% INCAE6IER --- - r I 1%' ATar PREFMECATEO SAN Ia 808? ENTSNa1ERMOUNTED TO RANSEDCOMKII9F PAD IPI& C w/ AUIOMADCTRANSFER SWRGI R PEWEE EMRX: U6NER pRAWll BY: ESC FED BY. JAM I ITS DUEL NH SPILL DT IPI d6CONIfC1sWR( yl WI CAMLOCx GENERATOR INTERFACE MOONED T; RAGED CONCRETE SLOOP 187 80R OF SNR7188 80W in wAw 10 6/ 21515 Alli, PvI? 8( 3S St c ; D. 1nSERIg aL` w ° yJ h. , s ew m PLAN ", `_ '_ 2 EQUIPMENT 20d- 1( y Nn N fir' r jVV/ P• e eLN Ct • Z.. A11f ts ..'. f. jr ' FPI MAT OC6 ISOM) SUPGE P.. 1 • a l grr! Q Pi• Ar& f RACK IO MGR RAE 5 -- • ALONE. TIP. ( TOTAL. 18) ' 1 1 t O._ o: PJ' AiaT QRU. M. 9P SECTOR R01N. A PI OAT PANG ANTENNA M. 5 PER SECTOR ( TOTµ. 121 ISTAC KIM 75 IP IaT BPRESXR, IP. IroTtd) V- nr if 76 I tiy II . 24. n 2 l dn, l y.. 17 C 15. III 56 r' ft• Y, K 4 f: 0,.. A ' AtF r l HIL03345 u1lAW ESTATES 113830PANOFA AHOAxA,Po96778LAP. WARO k, 1A42: ( 3) 13OO1) 207 i 1 O. b 1' 6„, r -' I c.;...... 1. Ae. x.: En i I SIese1 MM' \ ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT PLAN 7. 7• 70Ma' S. oel Ember A- 3 DIMENSION PLAN -.. . w-,, I 3 I,-, ANTENNA PLAN - r-- 1 n PREPARED , OR AT& T m[ ANUR AWN,/ LAN IPPON EMILI. ALI/ Y ANTENNAS. EWRM[ M. COAX AND ACC 3SORIUS MOWED IO vE III MONOROLF SNAIL RE ' AMID GREW. 1 IP) MOII7 SNALl EE PAN NEOGMM 1 AT& Tar KU S. MA' S. AND SURGE ARRESTORS NOT DEKRD N DRS vHv PCA CIT ECR LOGAN: RA OF 161 RBA NEN[ INGSEaRAM YAWS MINN HE DRAWING HE WA' MIC SB rO. in MONOPOLE STHL/ IPla4rrwTRL ANR> NAS ELEV. 10o41ACW' r aB: I. ALL I% ANTOPIAS. EOIAPMEM. COAX AND ACC6I0I16MODMEO TO INE LEI MONOPOLE SHALL a PANTED ONEM. 7 IPl. 777001{ ESNALL M EA POPDO• EM AS. AND G1 MIMEO 1 ' ATV WS. TMA 91E NOT LOCI® N ANS MEW T. CUAh FOR LOCw. OM OF Mg ITEM. Awl/ PIR RN@WANGI aEIAMNWSwMN ME AWNC Yr IAI NADHOEOE SIM J 1r1' AT& T PANEL ANTBRMS ELEV. 1000' µGLI I I 7-- I RAN0. ANTENNASRe4jAJ` atJ s_ fry ANIMW 1p EXCLL^, 1DN MT NICE. M ISNOWN AS REFERENCE 0411NDNDLLAV. NMWM A. 3 EBI SEC / 71 MT PANE; T OIY- 171 PJ are- Ino a PGA MONOPOLE P1OC Po' w& N • PI. sei FHA. CAWS WIN/ N 7 MPFROLIC 1ROVRO MANN al MONO. 1.1 IO ' ILIO POLE L' Z.. RAE..,... IAS RADCBDA 15ih. RASTRUCTU. tic Nr PIA MDANA 11. 411 VT PIPRYII Nwo. rO NCM lul0hmlull alA 1 AMBMA N I% OWL:& LMIANC& M. ISNOwN AS REAE161C! OMr) IA3a/ Pooh AN1IHMA rA. 3 EBt f![ TDR pawl xl NU SMC 1 HIL03345 C. ORA.. n: AC CTECrE0 Rt . AAM I . 0aD/ T9 REDS KV 0 Ca• 07r19 WO% EO A W Wf A ADa MA REv DAR DESCenW MI' Altr IMO NION MOTpcLE II DC MARA • m rue Mama COLES wf1M 7 MODVCI RDDIEDwTIM PI TAOTNOEgE To- In MST POLE ` A. ""••"•" M1 IES - AUX HAM EOL! MIRKA° EOWiP I RET: 1TEv. 1254 IA 0117= IPI War swm u EOtVNBlr SHELTER 1.O. 1E1SN0. 1R EIEV. 12S0- 1A. Gl 1 7 Ep AT& T AREE c! a• oce M AT& t WW1 FOIE OMIDfADPOWE a RRBN in AT& T SAN I. OUPv[ M SHELTERTA. jry SNEL? fR BEv. IL 1 awe H I L03345 LENANI ESTATES 13} CO OANOAtAIAPMNA RD PANDA. N96776 TEAK:: 1311. 3001 Dol EIEvIDS' IA L1 L ^ L Lam^. t lf- CNANNe /[ NCE IAGLI I IO. IN CNNN/ M FENCE A PAW WA BJVATIONS 1/4 M t. 7 NON GRIN C PP. MK RNCt wr PtryACr SLATS tt I EFRAYEDCaADE NGN IPI A 4 GREEN Cwu. IR. c NRC! W/ EnvAn• x+' PNISINEDGRAOELsty. o - o i p. 6' PI ATIr 170 WCC CNAN. Ua' E•. CE DOVLE SWIM; CANS W/ OREN 0ATS Pre // tmA- 4 EAST ELEVATION : _ ' 2 WEST ELEVATION „ : 1 I 1 NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Attachment 5. Area of Potential Effects You are required to provide two attachments regarding the Determination of Effect: Areas of Potential Effect and Mitigation of Effect (if applicable). Areas of Potential Effect Guidelines: a. Describe the APE for direct effects and explain how this APE was determined. The APE for direct effects is limited to the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof, that will be physically altered or destroyed by the Undertaking. On November 24, 2008, the FCC further clarified that the APE -Direct Effects is limited to the proposed lease area including the access route and utility corridor. Momi Wheeler. Archaeologist under the direct supervision of Chris Monahan, Ph.D., Archaeologist (SOI qualified) of TCP Hawaii, LLC completed a field survey on February 7, 2020 and determined that the APE for direct effects is limited to the 12' wide access/utility route and the proposed 35 - foot by 30 -foot lease area. Describe the APE for visual effects and explain how this APE was determined. The APE for visual effects is the geographic area in which the Undertaking has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character -defining feature of a historic property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register. The presumed APE for visual effects for construction of new facilities is the area from which the tower will be visible: a. Within a half mile from the tower site if the proposed Tower is 200 feet or less in overall height; b. Within'/. of a mile from the tower site if the proposed Tower is more than 200 but no more than 400 feet in overall height; or c. Within I '/: miles from the proposed tower site if the proposed Tower is more than 400 feet in overall height. Due to the height of the proposed tower, the presumed APE for visual effects for this project is a I/2 -mile radius from the tower site. Mitigation of Effect Guidelines: In the case where an Adverse Visual Effect or Adverse Direct Effect has been determined you must provide the following: a. Copies of any correspondence and summaries of any oral communications with the SHPO/THPO and any consulting parties. As of the date of this report, there has been no correspondence with the SHPO/THPO. Describe any alternatives that have been considered that might avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects. Explain the Applicant's conclusion regarding the feasibility of each alternative. No adverse effects are expected as a result of the proposed facility; therefore, alternatives that might avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects need not be considered. For each property identified as a Historic Property in the online a-106 form: Indicate whether the Applicant believes the proposed undertaking would have a) no effect; b) no adverse effect: or, c) an adverse effect. Explain how each such assessment was made. Provide supporting documentation where necessary. Applicants Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates The research and consultation process has not identified any historic properties within either APE. Therefore, the finding of effect is "No Historic Properties in the Area of Potential Effects — Direct Effects and Visual Effects." Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Attachment 6. Tribal and NHO Involvement At an early stage in the planning process, the Nationwide Agreement requires the Applicant to gather information from appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations ("NHOs") to assist in the identification of Historic Properties of religious and cultural significance to them. Describe measures taken to identify Indian tribes and NHOs that may attach religious and cultural significance to Historic Properties that may be affected by the collocation within the Areas of Potential Effects ("APE") for direct and visual effects. If such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, list them and provide a summary of contacts by either the FCC, the Applicant, or the Applicant's representative. Provide copies of relevant documents, including correspondence. If no such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, please explain. EBI Consulting filed the proposed undertaking on the FCC's Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The attached FCC Notification email lists the Tribes identified through the TCNS process. Follow up correspondence. when necessary, will be completed via the methods listed on the attached email considered acceptable to each Tribe. Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 Lilyan Curtis From: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 2:21 PM To: Lilyan Curtis Cc: tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #6887443 Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the notification that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). We note that the review period for all parties begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA and notifications that do not provide this serve as information only. Persons who have received the notification that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally -recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations'), Native Hawaiian Organizations NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The notification that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. A Tribal Nation or NHO may not respond until a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow- up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18-30). 1. Compliance Enforcement Anita C Manzano - Office of Hawaiian Affairs - 560 N. Nimitz Hwy., Suite 200 Honolulu, HI - anitam@oha.org - 808-594-1755 - electronic mail and regular mail Exclusions: The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) is not interested in reviewing TCNS projects that involve the replacement of existing structures on rooftops or buildings; the installation of new structures on rooftops or buildings; or, projects that do not involve ground disturbing work. The notification that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under Section III D or E of the NPA. 2. Chairperson Suzanne D Case - Department of Land & Natural Resources - 1151 Punchbowl Street - Room 220 Honolulu, Ht - suzanne.case@hawaii.gov; Russell.Y.Tsuji@hawaii.gov - 808-587-0401 - regular mail 3. Deputy SHPO Theresa K Donham - State Historic Preservation Office - 601 Kamokita Blvd Room 555 Kapolei, HI - theresa.k.donham@hawaii.gov - 808-692-8015 - electronic mail TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. In addition, a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain facilities (for example, a statement that it does not review collocations with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre -construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn that any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailingtcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 04/16/2020 Notification ID: 204964 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: AT&T Mobility, LLC Consultant Name: Lilyan J Curtis Street Address: 195 East B Street City: Benicia State: CALIFORNIA Zip Code: 94510 Phone: 707-208-7786 Email: lcurtis@ebiconsulting.com Structure Type: MTO W ER - Monopole Latitude: 19 deg 26 min 23.8 sec N Longitude: 154 deg 56 min 42.5 sec W Location Description: 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD City: Pahoa State: HAWAII County: HAWAII 2 4 Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a new telecommunications monopole tower and compound resulting in ground disturbance. Please see Attachment 4 of this filing for project design details. (6120001112) Ground Elevation: 319.7 meters Support Structure: 30.5 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 30.5 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 350.2 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: https://www.fcc.goviwirelessiavailable-support-services You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Attachment Historic Properties Direct Effects List all properties within the APE for direct effects. On March 3, 2020, TCP Hawaii, LLC completed a review of the available records as required per Section VI.D.2 of the Federal Communications Commission's 2004 Nationwide Programmatic Agreement to identify historic properties in the APE for Direct Effects. Based on this review, no Historic Properties were identified within the APE for direct effects. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for direct effects, not listed in part "a." (above), that the Applicant considers to be eligible for listing in the National Register as a result of the Applicant's research. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). For each property that was specifically considered and determined not to be eligible, describe why it does not satisfy the criteria of eligibility. The subject property primarily consists of vegetation and woodland. There are no above -ground structures, objects or buildings present within the APE -DE as defined above. Describe the techniques and the methodology, including any field survey, used to identify Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects.' If no archeological field survey was performed, provide a report substantiating that: i) the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed construction depth (excluding footings and other anchoring mechanisms) by at least 2 feet; or, ii) geomorphological evidence indicates that cultural resource -bearing soils do not occur within the project area or may occur but at depths that exceed 2 feet below the proposed construction depth.' TCP Hawaii, LLC completed the process outlined in Section VI.D.2 of the FCC's 2004 NPA to identify above ground historic properties. Please see parts a. and b. above. TCP Hawaii, LLC completed an evaluation of the proposed Project Site for the likelihood of containing archeological Historic Properties. Please refer to the attached report documenting the findings of this project review by a qualified archaeologist including a description of the techniques and the methodology used to identify Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects. This report concludes that archeological resources are not expected to be impacted by the construction of the proposed tower and installation of associated support equipment at the Project Site. Pursuant to Section VI.D.2.a. of the Nationwide Agreement, Applicants shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify above ground and archeological Historic Properties, including buildings, structures. and historic districts. that lie within the APE for direct effects. Such reasonable and good faith efforts may include a field survey where appropriate. a Under Section VI.D.2d. of the Nationwide Agreement, an archeological field survey is required even if none of these conditions applies, if an Indian tribe or NHO provides evidence that supports a high probability of the presence of intact archeological Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects. Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 C C TCP Hawaii, LLC Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties of Hawaii Preserving and Restoring Cultural and Natural Resources of Hawaii March 18, 2020 To: Ms. Aniela Travers (via email) EBI Consulting Re: Cultural Resources Report in Support of AT&T's Cell Tower Project in Pahoa, Hawai`i, 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Rd. (HIL03345), TMK (3) 1-3-001:007 (portion) Aloha Ms. Travers, This letter report describes the methods and results of a cultural resources assessment in support of the aforementioned proposed cell tower, a 100 -ft. monopole and associated appurtenances (installation of a 6 - ft. high chain link fence, and a pre -fabricated equipment shed to be installed at grade) adjacent to Pahoa Kalapana Rd. The proposed tower location is in an undeveloped area adjacent to an access road off the main (Pahoa Kalapana) road. The area in and around the direct APE is at the southwestern end of the 1955 lava flow (see Figure 1). Native soil in the direct APE is "Malama extremely cobbly highly decomposed plant material," which consists of several feet of 'al cobbles overlying bedrock.' This type of native "soil" is essentially several feet of lava rock resting on `al flow with a few centimeters of organic mat on top. It is described by the USDA-NRCS as "not prime farmland." Scope of work According to the agreed upon scope of work, we performed the following research and fieldwork tasks: 1. Records search at the Hawaii SHPD library in Kapolei, Oahu, and the SHPD library in Hilo, Hawaii, using a'/2 -mile radius circle around the candidate location as our search area; search was intended to document archaeological and architectural resources (a) listed on the NRHP and HRHP, and also (b) formally documented as eligible for these listings; 2. Site location inspection (pedestrian survey) and documentation; 3. Excavation and documentation of one shovel test probe (STP) at the candidate location, if archival research indicates a need and if it is practical to hand excavate; 4. Photographic survey of visual effect of the candidate location on any listed or formally eligible historic property within the'/2-mile radius search area. Methods During the week of February 24-28, 2020, TCP Hawaii made an electronic request to the SHPD Library requesting any records, files and previous historic properties within a '/2 -mile radius of the candidate location. TCP Hawaii staff (Fred LaChance) visited the SHPD library in Kapolei, Oahu, on March 3, 2020, to search for any records, files and previous historic properties within a V2 -mile radius of the candidate location. TCP Hawai`i also searched the following on-line databases: (a) National Park Service's listing of National Register ofHistoric Places (NRNP), (b) State of Hawai`i's listing of Hawai`i Register of Historic Places (HRHP), and (c) Historic Hawaii Foundation's listing of architectural historic Soil data from USDA-NRCS website (https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm) 1 of 7 TCP Hawaii Cultural Resources Report, Leilani Estates, Hawaii EBI properties on or eligible for the NRHP and HRHP. Finally, TCP Hawaii also made reference to its own GIS database. On February 7, 2020, TCP Hawai'i archaeologist Momi Wheeler, B.A., with more than Len (10) years of professional work experience as an archaeologist in Hawai'i, conducted fieldwork in the direct APE and within and around the visual (indirect) APE. She was managed and directed by the Principal Investigator, Chris Monahan, Ph.D., who is qualified under the U.S. Secretary of the Interior's standards. The entire ground surface at the proposed cell tower construction footprint and associated appurtenances was subject to pedestrian survey. Because the direct APE's underlying native soil consists of several feet of'a`a cobbles, and because it lies at southwestern end of the 1955 lava flow, no subsurface testing (archaeological excavation) was conducted. Results The records search of SHPD's files yielded a few relevant documents pertaining to previous historic preservation assessments and othcr correspondence with SHPD within and near the 'L -mile radius search area.- Based on our archival research, no historic properties have been identified in this area. Figure 1 and Figure 2 depict the location of the proposed cell tower (HIL03345). Pedestrian survey at the proposed cell tower construction footprint and associated appurtenances showed there are no historic properties in the direct APE. Figures 3-5 arc overviews of the proposed cell tower location. Figure 6 and Figure 7 are overviews of the access road adjacent to the proposed cell tower location. Conclusion Based on all of the data gathered and generated for this project, our conclusion is that the proposed undertaking will have no effect on the direct APE, which consists of several feet of `a`a cobbles atop bedrock on a portion of the 1955 lava flow. Regarding the indirect (visual) APE for this proposed undertaking, there are no known historic properties within the 1/4 -mile radius search area. We believe the proposed undertaking will have no effect on historic properties. As always, please let us know if you have any questions or concepts about this letter report. With aloha, 32.1 Christopher M. Monahan, Ph.D. Principal Investigator, Archaeologist TCP Hawaii, LLC 150 Hamakua Dr., #810 Kailua, HI 96734 mookahan(1i emai1.corn 808) 754-0304 2 Wheeler, Wilkinson & Hammett (2015) Archaeological Evaluation and Archoeologlrnl Monitoring Planfor the Stale Department of Defense Emergency Siren Modernisation Program. 16 Hnwai'i Locations:.. HA 915—Echos; Estates, Keahialala Ahnpua a, Pena Distric/ (TAM: /3/ 1-3-036:042 _ J, Cultural Surveys Hawai, Inc., Kailua, III; Kwan (1995) Consultation correspondence with SHPI) re County of Hawaii Special Permit Application (No. 95-05) Quarry & Stockpiling Uses (Sanford's Service Center), Kamaili Homesteads, l'una, Hawaii, TMK: 1-3-01: 7, on file at SHPI); Sweeney & Bnrtchard (1994) Archaeolop• in the Kilauea East Rift Zone, Par/ H: A Preliminary Sample .Save); Kapoho, Komo'i/i & Kilauea Geo/hennal.Rhzanes,, Pana District, Ilawai`i Island, International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc-, Honolulu. 2 of7 TCP Hawaii Cultural Resources Report, Leilani Estates, Hawaii EBI C Cell Site # HIL03345 0.5 Mile Buffer I I Historic Property HOMESTEADS 1,200Meters Feet 1,800 3,600 Copyrih 42913iNatio5al GeograpilV tety) -cu.• Figure 1. USGS topographic map showing location of proposed cell tower (HIL03345) and %-mile radius; there are no known previously -identified historic properties in the '4 -mile radius area 3of7 TCP Hawai`i Cultural Resources Report, Leilani Estates, Hawai`i EBI Cell Site # HIL03345 1 0.5 Mile Buffer I I Historic Property p' liylMNy9 JNr 1L SQ}} yy`yy LA, 11. 5napi4 IJRW® 1 leu mat. 5,04, { .CAW} tad eis Lbw a.enurrdIky Figure 2. Aerial image showing location of proposed cell tower (HIL03345) and V2 -mile radius; there are no known previously -identified historic properties in the %-mile radius area 4 of 7 TCP Ilawai`i Cultural Resources Report, Leilani Estates, Hawai`i E131 Figure 3. Looking to the location of the proposed cell tower, facing west Figure 4. Looking to the location of the proposed cell tower, facing south 5 of7 TCP Hawai`i Cultural Resources Report, Leilani Estates, Hawaii EBI Figure 5. Looking to the location of the proposed cell tower, facing north Figure 6. Overview of access road adjacent to location of proposed cell tower, view north 6 of 7 TCP Hawaii Cultural Resources Report, Leilani Estates, Hawai`i EBI Figure 7. Overview of access road adjacent to location of proposed cell tower, view west 7 of 7 TCP Hawai`i Cultural Resources Report, Leilani Estates, Hawaii EBI et NT SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 620 Attachment 8. Historic Properties Visual Effects Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Historic Properties Identified for Visual Effects Guidelines a. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for visual effects that is listed in the National Register, has been formally determined eligible for listing by the Keeper of the National Register, or is identified as considered eligible for listing in the records of the SHPO/THPO, pursuant to Section VI.D.I.a. of the Nationwide Agreement. On March 3, 2020, TCP Hawaii, LLC completed a review of the available records as required per Section VI.D.I of the Federal Communications Commission's 2004 Nationwide Programmatic Agreement to identify historic properties in the APE for Visual Effects Based on this review, no Historic Properties were identified within the APE for visual effects. b. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each Historic Property in the APE for visual effects, not listed in part "a", identified through the comments of Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public. Identify each individual or group whose comments led to the inclusion of a Historic Property in this attachment. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). As of the date of this report, EBI has not received comments from Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public that identify Historic Properties in the APE for visual effects that are not listed in the above list of Historic Properties. 1 c. For any properties listed in the above Historic Properties list, that the Applicant considers no longer eligible for inclusion in the National Register, explain the basis for this recommendation. N/A Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Attachment Local Government a. If any local government has been contacted and invited to become a consulting party pursuant to Section V.A. of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, list the local government agencies contacted. Provide a summary of contacts and copies of any relevant documents (e.g., correspondence or notices). Please see the attached correspondence with the local government. As of the date of this submission packet, EBI Consulting has not received any comments from the local government. Should a response be received, copies will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this submission packet. b. If a local government agency will be contacted but has not been to date, explain why and when such contact will take place. N/A Applicants Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 AAEBI Consulting environmental 1 engineering 1 due diligence 6876 Susquehanna Trail ,South York, PA 17403 Tel: (717) 428-0401 www-ehi cons ulti nq.com March 17, 2020 Mr. Alex J. Roy CLG Coordinator Planning Division/Cultural Resources Commission County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street. Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Aiex.rontletawaiicounty4 v Subject Invitation to Comment LEILANI ESTATES / HIL03345 FA 10553982 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Rd., Pahoa, HI 96778 EBI Project #6120001112 Dear Mr. Roy: Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the regulations promulgated thereunder and interagency agreements developed thereto, EBI Consulting, inc., on behalf of AT&T Mobility. LLC, provides this notice of a proposed telecommunications facility installation at the address listed above. EBI would like to inquire if you would he interested in commenting on this proposed project Please refer to the attached project plans for additional details regarding this proposed project. Please note that we are requesting your review of the attached information as part of the Section 106 process only and not as pan of the local zoning process. We are only seeking comments related to the proposed project's potential effect to historic properties. Please submit your comments regarding the proposed projects potential effect on historic properties to EBI Consulting, to my attention at 6876 Susquehanna Trail South, York, PA 17403, or contact me via telephone at the number fisted below. Please reference the EBI project number. We would appreciate your comments as soon as possible within the next 30 days. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns about the proposed project. Respectfully Submitted, lUcitu- tyt..e Ms. Alexis Green Assistant Technical Director — Cultural Resources agreen a@ebiconsulting.com T (585) 8153290 F (781) 425-5167 Attachments - Drawings and Maps Sarah Boucher From: Microsoft Outlook To: Alex.roy@hawaiicounty.gov Sent; Wednesday, March 18, 2020 10.47 AM Subject: Relayed: 6120001112 - LEILANI ESTATES, Pahoa, HI Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the destination server: Alex. ovE hawaiicountv.uov (Alex.rov@hawaiicountv,gov1 Subject: 20001112 - LEILANI ESTATES, Pahoa, t1I NT SUBMISSION PACKET-- FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates Attachment 10. Other Consulting Parties and Public Notice List additional consulting parties that were invited to participate by the Applicant, or independently requested to participate. Provide any relevant correspondence or other documents. Please see the attached correspondence with interested parties. As of the date of this submission packet, EBI Consulting has not received any comments from any interested parties. Should a response be received, copies will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this submission packet. You are required to provide a Public Notice Attachment. Attached, please find a copy of the legal notice regarding the proposed telecommunications installation that was posted in Hawaii Tribune -Herald on March 24, 2020. As of the date of this submission packet, no comments regarding this notice have been received by EBI. Should a response be received, copies will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this submission packet Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 EBI Consulting IATAMI environmental 1 engineering 1 due diligence 6876 Susquehanna Trail South York, PA 17403 Tel: (717) 428-0401 www eblconsulti ng.com March 17. 2020 Hawaiian Historical Society do Mr_ Ronald Williams Jr. President 560 Kawaiahao Street Honolulu, HI 96813 808) 537-6271 hhsoNicc(Dthawalinnhlstorv_ore Subject Invitation to Comment LEILANI ESTATES! H1403345 FA 10553982 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Rd., Pahoa, HI 96778 EBI Project #6120001 1 12 Dear Mr. Williams: Pursuant to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, the regulations promulgated thereunder and interagency agreements developed thereto, EBI Consulting, Inc., on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC, provides this notice of a proposed telecommunications facility installation at the address listed above. EBI would like to inquire if you would be interested in commenting on this proposed project. Please refer to the attached project plans for additional details regarding this proposed project. Please note that we are requesting your review of the attached information as part of the Section 106 process only and not as part of the local zoning process. We are only seeking comments related to the proposed projects potential effect to historic properties, Please submit your comments regarding the proposed project's potential effect on historic properties to E81 Consulting, to my attention at 6876 Susquehanna Trail South, York PA 17403, or contact me via telephone at the number listed below. Please reference the EBI project number. We would appreciate your comments as soon as possible within the next 30 days, Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns about the proposed project. Respectfully Submitted, L l.a.u- Ms. Alexis Alexis Green Assistant Technical Director— Cultural Resources agreen@ebiconsu1ting.com T (585) 815-3290 781) 425-5167 Attachments - Drawings and Maps Sarah Boucher From: Microsoft Outlook To: hhsoffice@hawaiianhistory.org Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 10:48 AM Subject: Relayed: 6120001112 - LEILANI ESTATES, Pahoa, HI Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the destination server: hbsofficeCahawaiianhistorv,orci (hhsofficE@ hawaiianhistorv,orq) Subject: 6120001112 - LEILANI ESTATES, Pahoa, HI 6876 xuslueharrn Tial l South Y ik 4 174031 (17) 4Ih7=, GI Fax (1 17) 418 0, 03 A environmental 1 engineering 1 due diligence sst, ,ekr.,,,,,p,r,g cost, March 17, 2020 Hawaii Tribune -Herald Iepals(tilhawai itri bu ne-herald.com Subject: Request for Public Notice EBI Project R6120001112 EBI Consulting (EBI), on behalf of AT&T Mobility, LLC, would like to place the following ad in your paper for print on the next available date. Please send a tear sheet (not an affidavit) of the ad for confirmation to the address noted an the letterhead. The following is the text of the Public Notice: AT&T Mobility, LLC is proposing to construct a new telecommunications tower facility located at 13-3020 Pahoa Kalapana Rd., Pahoa, HI 96778. The new facility will consist of a 100 -foot monopole telecommunications tower. Any interested party wishing to submit comments regarding the potential effects the proposed facility may have on any historic property may do so by sending comments to: Project 6120001 112 - AMG EBI Consulting, 6876 Susquehanna Trail South, York. PA 17403, or via telephone at (585) 815-3290. Please send an invoice for the cost of the posting to the address noted above. Please reference EBI Project 6120001112 on any correspondence pertaining to this project, to ensure prompt processing. Please e-mail or call me with any questions or concerns concerning this publication. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Nicholas Pischetti Telecom Environmental Operations Support 978-877-6332 nfischetti( ebiconsu1ting.com AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION IN THE MATTER OF PORI JC Nonce SLATE OF HAWAII SS City end County of Honolulu Doc. Date: MAR 2 4 1r'?fl Notary Name: Patricia K. Reese Doc. Description: Affidavit of Publication Pages: 1 Pi piked' ICircuit p\C. NOTARY '. PUBLIC No, 86-46? OF 1 -‘?to‘' Guwn Pane being duly sworn, deposes and says that she is a clerk, duly authorized to e ecute this affidavit of Oahu Publications, Inc. publisher ofThe Honolulu Star -Advertiser, MidWeck, The Garden Island, West Hawaii Today, and Hawaii Tribune -Herald, that said newspapers are newspapers of general circulation in the Slate of Hawaii,' and that the attached notice rs true notice as was published in the Honolulu Star -Advertiser 0 times on: MidWeek The Garden Island Hawaii Irbunc-Herald 03/24/2020 West Hawaii Today 0 times on: 0 times on: 1 times an: 0 times on: Other Publications: 0 times an: And that affront is not a party to or in any way interested in the above entitled matter. Gwyn Pang afore melitis#' /,1/caayof % AD. 204 Lama GlOG../ udicial Circuit, State of Hawaii AT&T Mobility. LLC Is proposing to conawm a new telecommunications tower facility located at 133620 Pahoe ralapana Rd., Peke, 111 961111. Iha new BONYµI1sandal of a 1004001 monopole tlecommuelulons tower. My interested parry rosining to submit comments regarding the potential effects the proposed facility may have on any hlsok property I01112do so by g comments to: eonsulthg, Project676 Susquehanna hall Mulh, York, PA 11403, or via telephone al (585) 01A3290 081273681 3/24/20) 2\ C,\!a. I\ /'l,c.' Q. NOTARY -•'.m. ii PUBLIC 1* t No.66-467 i ICSP. NO.'. NT SUBMISSION PACKET -- FCC FORM 620 Attachment 11. SHPO Specific Forms Please see attached required SHPO form. Applicant's Name: Project Name: Project Number: Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for public burden estimates AT&T Mobility, LLC LEILANI ESTATES HIL03345 FA 10553982 FCC Form 620 STATE OF HAWAII DEI'ARFAIENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES STATE 1115 IURIC PRESERVATION DIVISION K:1KP.IiI111:WA BUILDING rA)I KAMOKILA BLVD. SIP 555 KAPOI P:1, I IAWAII 96707 HRS 6E Submittal Filing Fees All submittals must have the appropriate filing fee in accordance with HAR §13-275-4 or HAR § 13-284-4. All contact Gelds below must be complete and accurate. Landowner: SANrORDS SERVICE CENTER INC Agency Contac) Name: Mailing Address: Phone: ifprivately -owned historic properly on (Hawaii Register, HRS §6E-10) AT&T Moality. LLC Ansa Lalt 1120 201M1 S1 NW Suite 1000 202-457-3068 Email: a17161@attcom Title of Report/Plan: subml.¢ron Packet. FCC Form 620, for proposed New Tower Project 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD, Parma. Hawaii County, H %778 LEILANI ESTATES I HIL03305 FA 10553982 EBI Project Number: 6120001112 Ahupua`a IMR(s) Contract Firm: Paboo 3)1SgIt007 Hawaii 96778 EBI Consulting firm who completed the work on behalf of the agency) Contact Name: Makenzie Bawsea Phone: 717472x070 Ernap, mbandsta@ebioonsuuing mm Check if Report/Plan is a re -submittal (no fee) Check if Field Inspection Report requested by SIIPD (no fee) 0 Archaeological Monitoring Report, no resources reported 25 Archaeological Monitoring Plan 525 Burial Disinterment Report 25 Request from Agency for Determination Ietter per HAR §13-275 50 Archaeological Assessment (AIS with negative findings) 50 Osteological Analysis Report 100 Archaeological Monitoring Report, resourcesrcporled 5150 Archaeological Inventory Survey Plan, Archaeological Data Recovery Plan, or Preservation Plan 250 Burial'freannent Plan (STP) S450 Archaeological, Architectural, or Ethnographic SurveyReport 450 Archaeological Data Recovery Report s50 Fee Total: Make check payable to "Hawaii Historic PreservationSpecial Fund" For Office Use Onlv: Date Received: Payment Method: Cash Amount$ Log No.. Check No. Amount $ Receipt Issued: Money Order Amount$ rev. 9/26/2017 State Historic Preservation Division HRS 6E Submittal Form Per §6E, Hawaii Revised Statutes, if the Project requires review by the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD), please review and fill out this limn and submit all requested information to SIIPD. Please submit this form and project documentation electronically to: dlur. intake.shpd(rehawaii.gov If you are unable to submit electronically, please contact SHPD at (808) 692-8015. Mahalo_ The submission date ofthis fonn 1. APPLICANT (select one) Property Owner E Government Agency 2. AGENCY (select one) E Planning Department Department of Public Works '7 Other (specify): FCC Type of Permit Applied For: FCC wireless license 3. APPLICANT CONTACT 3.1) Name: Makcnzie Dandstra 3.2) Title: Architectural Historian 3.3) Street Address: 6876 Susquehanna Trail South 3.4) County: York 3.5) State: PA 3.6) Zip Code: 17403 3.7) Phone: 717-472-3070 3.8) Email: mbandstra@)ebiconsulting.com 4. PROJECT DATA 4_I) Penni' Number (if applicable): N/A 4.2) TMK [e.g. (3) 1-2-003:004 (3)1-3-001:007 4.3) Street Address: 13-3820 PAIIOA KALAPANA RD 4.4) County: Hawaii 4.5) State: HI 4.6) Zip Code: 96778 4.7) Total Property Acreage: 441.36 48) Project Area (acreage, square feet): 1,050 square foot 4.9) List any previous SIIPD correspondence (LOG Number & DOC Number, if applicable): LOG NO. n/a DOC NO. 5. PROJECT INFORMATION 5.1) Does the Project involve a Historic Property? A Historic Property is any building, stnicture, object, district, area, or site, including beim] and undo Yes © No ter site, which is over 50 Pears old (HRS (:6F-2)_ 5.2) The date(s) ofconstruction for the historic property (building, stmaure, object, distriet, are including heiau and underwater site) is 5.3) Is the Property listed un the Hawaii and or National Register of Historic Places? To check: hitpJ/dlnr.hawaii.gov/shpd/ Ycs No 5A) Detailed Project Description and Scope of Work: Al &T Mobility, LLC proposes the installation of a 100 -foot monopole tower, and associated support equipment located within an approximately 35 -foot by 30 -foot lease area. 5.5) Description ofprevious ground disturbance (e_g_ previous grading and grubbing): 5.6) Description ofpromised ground disturbance (e.g. # of trenches. Length x Width x Depth): Ground disturbance will be limited to the 12' wide access mule and the proposed 1,050 square foot lease area. 5.7) The Agency shall ensure whether historic properties are present in the project area, and, if so, it shall ensure that these properties are properly identified and inventoried_ Identify all known historic properties: 5.8) Once a historic properly is identified, then an assessment of significance shall occur. Integrity (check all that apply): Location 0 Design 0 Setting 0 Materials Workmanship O Peeling Association Cntcria (check all that apply): a — associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns of our history h — associated with the lives of persons important in our past c — embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work of a master; or possess high artistic value d — have yielded, or is likely to yield, inthmration important for research on prehistory or history e — have an important value to the Native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group of the state due to associations with cultural practices once canned out or still carried out, at the property or due to associations with traditional beliefs, events, or oral accounts - - these associations being important to the group's history and cultural identity 5.9) The effects or impacts of a project on significant hist Effect Determination (select one): properties shall be determined by the agency. Z No Historic Properties Affected Effect, with Agreed Upon Mitigation Commitments (§6E-42, HRS) Effect, with I'roposed Mitigation Commitments (§6E-8, HRS) 5.10) This project is (check all that apply, if applicable): an activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction ofa Federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a Federal agency; carried out with Federal financial assistance; and or D requiring a Federal permit, license or approval. If any ofthese boxes are checked, then the Project may also he subject to compliance wish Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NI -IPA). 6. PROJECT SUBMITTALS 6.1) Please submit a copy of the Tax Map Key (TMK) map 62) Please submit a copy of the properly map showing the project area and indicate if the project arca is smaller than the property area. 6.3) Please submit a permit set of drawings. A pennit set is a set of drawings prepared and signed by a licensed architect or engineer and is at least 65% complete. 6.4) Are you submitting a survey? Yes IZ) No Specify Survey: 6.5) Did SHPD request the survey? E Ves Z No If `Yes', then please provide the date, SHPD LOG NO, and DOC NO: Data. LOG NO. DOC NO. 6.6) SURVEY REVIEW FEES. Fee for Review of Reports and Plans (§§13-275-0 and 28(1-4). A fling fee will be charged for all reports and plans submitted to our office for review. Please go to: http:Alnrliawaii.gov/shpt/about.ranches'archaeologv/filing-fee-scheduld A check payable to the Hawaii Historic Preservation Special Fund should accompany all reports or plans submitted. 6.7) Please submit color photos/images of the Historic Property (any building, structure, object, district, area, or site, including heiau and underwater site) that will be atTccted by the Project Hie lollowing arc the minimum number and type of color photographs required. Quantity Description 1-2 Street views) of the resource and surnunding area 1-2 Over view of exterior work area 1 exterior photo of the North elevation (if applicable) 1 exterior photo of the South elevation (if applicable) I exterior photo of the East elevation (if applicable) exterior photo ofthe West elevation (if applicable) 1-2 interior photos(s) of areas affected (if applicable) CHECKLIST SHPD FORM 6E (this form) Z PROJECT SUBMITTALS (any requested documentation for items 6.1 -6 7 of this form) O FILING FEE FORM (if applicable) T3• L'Fin r Odor' s ACAMA/ U- RAPfLEAU PUNA, CODE COMPLIANCE RO'' YLEGA- L ° 6O R' D"` NEW BUILD LTE ONLY IC: FLARSDL021465 AO USID: 141011 FA CODE: 10553982 PREPARED FOR ` W AT& T MIMT MANT NINTIIel R A" A. c. A AtU M. T ... 5 9. 99;. di , l. 01, 4- A') NV mlf0 m ACCORDANCE PPR TALE crC. V EDrraaa• K AIONNGcODES AS AD( YRODY HALE 14X' 999 CT hW RC .., K) wtf5 vOM.(: N MEI MANS 6 TO aE CO STM: ED 90. 99,.., WO. Y NOT C r". 0. NG TO 11EfE 40013APPROVED. 1 X06 UAERNATI0NAL N* DNG CODE N1TN LOCAL . MtIC4I07 X17 NATpN. LNE PROW PON ASSOCNT.) 1 MAPA) I XIS NIb1NADONAL EHEPGV COP ERVATON CODE 911 NMM rwx, r Ref P.. A• I f. 7P. 1 AT& T SITE NUMBER: HIL03345 SITE NAME: LEILANI ESTATES SITE TYPE: MONOPOLE/ SHELTER ADDRESS: 13- 3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 TMK: ( 3) 1- 3- 001: 007 v"'°": INrRASTRUCTURF: 677 MAMOM^ 8Lro. STE917 N() NOLULV. RANA& 9681 S rbPDX« / Ma^" o°• I-, wNw. 1AT 5•. ES: HIL03345 PROJECT TEAM VICINITY MAP LOCAL MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. RJF' AM 711557E SERE ACOLVI[ H6 PPOROSED SPE {: RD OP AN UNA. AVED TESE: OAWA/ N.: ATOM f/ KU99. CO4aW . OfMI9QLOWNC f ImdTAIL 01. 1 All II f_+_ CHICIE.^ a9 Aa. A11TAA0RUM1 N 0 RAARLICTURE PARTERS TO) ' ANEW • ENA CONTACT: ODTAPAC COOPER ALAN. 119679P FRAM, Oome. co pliplrnlcom 1111091 67S. 1997 CO161N) CTKkI MANAGER AILT PROJECT MAMAS, TP' as w N.AOHD• OII f w NSIALIADJI109 NII) ATM PANES ANTENNAS NSTALEARCH CP TM AIM 1110. 601! RAM • S 1$ 1 NTALAPON OP 11$ DC • SURGE \ NSTALUTQI O III 0. 1 ANTENNA R. • \ ROUIPM6R ROW: 0(/ 1/ 19 NDS RE, 0 06. 102/ 19 IODk 7DI A 0, X011. * RN 101 RFV OAR OES.: R/ 1ON CONTACT. DAVM' 001150. 6 CONTACT vANNE SSA .. 4. 111. 1,,.. IAEA D0397NAR. COM bAAk.' WrR2 , 711, 71 N ISOOILX. LS61 M:( SWI• 72• WL] WHOM: IWNO: ATL/ MOEEIW IS IIIPASWRVC WOE PARMIRS CONTACT: CHEM NAKATA CONTACT ANDREW ICI* H 11 RAN McsiER bAIL: Og1NMpILJEIlp. a911 EANIL. IW7{ 7R6Rtcon, PH. ILOL9861871 M We 67741710 ARCHITECT/ ENON: PROAECTNANA0 w. R.. N. I m . 1.. 1MW4aw • 71` I. CAMRES R i. s.'< cANJ riA u. • BIG ISLAND OF HAWAII NS1AWnON CA AN AT& T SSd II 374, 11690 SORI TRFCUMWNCAPCN COMIOl. 10 tEAS/ AREA w HSLAWnCN CA CO MCAT CAM CINN UN. 1N1Cf1G W/ GM., k Jam.. r . PANACfSUR jr NSNIIATION[ 1 III PRNAEN0AIIO EOUPM1N15NH. 11. 1 L w NSTAWTIONOIIIDESEL SAC 0UPO( TIFRAIOP I \_..---"' w I STTAALLA lOPON!, 111 INT SO 10110IANR r INSTALLATION!, III EMERSON POWER RANT RACI. w/ 912) r ... SUMMON Of ID 1111, 70 , ACTS w NSTAl1AnON (/ III NIIMII W/ UTLI$ EG111. MP111 r N$ TAILATIONO NIIAIU NOGF w PSTALLAfIONO10WOl911199 CAERE INNERS w PISIIMTONOf III 0017 SWOENNPRRSORS MINI RAC 1 i 1.... o.... \ 5lNASRULTLWE PARTS sS NRASTNCME / 117110: COlbct: 7077991 MEA7DA CONTACT: * 101 A0099 MTNY 99. 9• 99• 459909• 9 FMA. bb. n« SV rem PN Pap) 20. 7767 M late) 411. 711 SITE INFORMATION GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES DRIVING DIRECTIONS SHEET INDEX REV. PROPERTY O1. HEf SANFORD, WCENTER IS96f. FAAWMIDA fD 9911099 N% 77L AWIXCRON CORM Cf NAVA• wN0 LOADS: 106 MN 175ECOND OI, E11 ERPOSUPE CATEGORY: C 576114 ZONE • FLOOD ZONE: k TAW . 1, 131, 9001W 10NPIG: AGRICULTURE AGAR 1A1111pf DOD ( 139: IP 26' 73. 77111 IONOTUDE( NAOS)/ ISP 0647ATO, R ACCBSMIRY REOURbAb115: fACUM16AN VIQNIIIEO lOVPAEPIT DO , ADT SCALE PRAW.' IA DWECTONS FROM MAOAEPORI: YID1ERUANAOA R. MQ 11/ 731 GAT, C494991. NMFSWW1w ` _ R• MESE PLANS ARE PORMATRAI.D TO IR RAI. 97E AT Ilk IL 56'. CORACTORS 1, 4/ 4l WIRY ALL RAMS ANI[ MING DIAENSO16 AND 411091016 ON RE EOE SQ AND SHALL IUAIEOMIR' PIg11T N wnHIRC17lnGNf99 N WITTING OP AMP DtrJEPAHCE516ORE PROCEEDING MRN TIE WORK OR NAMPA( 080131 Q BE RESPC. 9LIE FOR DE SMT. 1 HEAD NORMLESt 06 MOORRDP[ ERUANAOA ST TOwAID A/ 04. 0 St 7 IUM LEFT 0. 116111NAWN IMIROFRANOESBIUA AN J COMMA* W FOLLOW H. 11/ HNWM Mkt RD N WE REl61 I LANES TO NUM L61 ONTO 1 17NEAAVPANOA 11 PASS RD 0 C0. 8, 81610 POUCH, 11. 131 CM7 ! RE SC. NAGE AI SASE V. AN 74 ENLARGED SPF PLAN a C NA\ hMD PLAN AJ ANRMN1EOJ . 1001 MN M E'iEVALO6 ...... @..,, .. r... C "'•^•'"' e` er ^ ITNARIF9. HIL03345 IfRA7N ESTATES 193170 PAWA' AIAPAr1. RD 919911099. 1196778 TMK: 13J 1. 34010V GENERAL NOTES 6. AT ME4199194 CRCE. COMMA SIRAIONI ONTO HI 131/ 1AHOA BYPASS RD COMMIE W TOILCIW H 131 NI 9M: 0119T VW WALED AND NOT TOR HUMAN NARRATION. A 1171NIC0NYALL ' 711 INE 511E AS ROWRED P . 1 ROUSNE MANRNANCE. ME PROJECT WLL NOS RESULT IN ANY SIONNCANT O' RURLANL- E OR EFFECT ON MANAGE. NO SANITARY SEWER SERVICE POI NTE WATER OR IRAN DISPOSAL 6 MOMS AND NO C. OPMARCIA1. SGrNAOF 0 PROPOSED IUM POI, Y. RE5WCRD USAGE ROAD 10. DESIMAMJN WU BE ON ME RGM 51994E NOT NRIO FOR r. MAAN NARRATION AND ONLY TRCWDOZY 1r1100 A ANNIENANCE PERSONAL ACCESSIBLE, 0 01/ 7 REM/ REOPEN IC X04 SECT100 MIS IMMUNE SPACES) p941AGMER NER Aia1 POWp AGNDNLI': rQCO RODS PERSON MAL 166NONE AGENCY. NAwAWI TELECOM OARURYRO 01/ 79/ I. STATEMENTS sn. 19011.: ` TITLE SHEET STNCIURAL ANALYSES TS NOTWIIIN ME SCOPE OF NCR,. COHTAP40 N 1116 ORAWNGS SFT. 1091 ANALYSE OF IWSTNG ANO/ OR PROPOSED COMPONENTS. REM TO SWUCNIAI 11AL1S0 1. 0910ED MOOR SEPARATE CO/ ER 9909. ANALYSE ANALRER TOrKP1. 1THE114. 101W4110011070NMSD.. W lP 0181OFMOUM f0ANAL91E1emcf UNCER SEPARATE CORER . RDv 10. NRrNA MOV. tSTRJCTIAAlwN4Y56. 910/ 45. VNCER3011AE COv7R DI ; , IT L 800- 227- 2600 o. 11* 9. 11910. r . 0. 0• 1. rS R. LNp1OT. T_ 1 u O ikfAPPENANC6 AND UAW IJECEILA IA ( GANG A [ AAA} 1: 1AUTATED OA Elf AEA ELREC AC CEACAR ADDEONA " AGEOFGAO AWE* Ail5FEJGRADE • EINAH APACE AERATE WAG AAA. AA AA 1-1 ILAWA il GAUGE Alf AIIHAWEAr lit CAA. MAPPEAAR ACC( 0001. AUVA ( ED SEAM MAE OAAIDAA ' AIWA up, FEEDER ME Irekb CAVA, MA No, ' MAGEE CAVEAT MAU) AJUMON COWAN i G01. 1111, - Ary PAGAIELM DENA VAN] LAC AEC EGANEO, Ali AAA PAVER Uff flAGAIAL AG GO YUMA, ANIALOI CfAIXACASI EfAil MAEIAA A G • PAMAREREA0 GARNET KOWA EA 001E105 PER SQUARE ITCH 1011. 40A PAAVERE if FOGG. EUGINA NAVA ? CAME! EGOZPOP Ay QUANTITY MON 0100. REFERENCE Finnif CAECA SWAGS AGAVE( TEA iuiR rff, f_. (".... BRAE G14Alf 0..o. nAILAIATE19 EAT I GAUD AGE en AEON C.- Sao F ifGEE AMU - AYE SYMBOL - ( AA YE A VIA g- _ WOOD FENCE AI AAA. AliEl AAAA 1". ifiIPA 777 M1777. 1. M' ib IAPGEAAT AT& T HIL03345 MONO ... HIL03345 WEAN ! STARS AAA TA GENERAL NOTES GN 1 AT& T AT& T MCKIITTM TO OCACMATE IMIIIMSCA1 n< FOLLOMENDWOOR for . w.. N rCA. CO DANGER NO TRESPASSING NOTICE AUTHORIZED PERSONNEL ONLY CDANGE) CDA NGEft) DIESEL FUEL tin ACID DT rB NO SMOKING NO OPEN FUMES NO SMOKING INFORMATION 1 2 34567 Property of AT& T Authorized Personnel Only Property of AT& T Authorized Personnel Only mem< c4 emergency orocelopeeDm& gi h WARNING CAUTION na, ond This Point as Beyond This Point a,r FCCRI PPa" aiAirlrvw" e" NOTICE neund " Ibis Poln 1,00are entenng re+ RE ye HIL03345 HIL03345 1110. 111 ESTATES SITE SIGNAGE GN - 2 N SITE PLAN t a 1 ! N TMK 1311 „' iN IN] PROPOSED ATM PROJECT AREA RE' ER JO ENAS^ D SCE PLAN ON SHEET 42 O e'5" 0.e OP. AT& T Hft03345 ltitANI ' awes A- 1 AC ESE AIESOGIIEEEIATOTEA111 CE 111AFAtt AYE 1.) AltE .0-17He, AI 17 `. II :, EE,. E . w. w. A T° aiN.a 91i rec*Art PAAA Et LAY EANT` IPIEa } itik11, 11/ AIM EA( tE: IA D' fit .. A mW P. 1A1A I ys H,,; ruaE AEIXIAIAIdtlIelttS ME. VA1 E(1• , z r IAEA- PA/AA1 111103345 GE r DIP MAE CARE EAAAEOTAIrl E.CEIDPIAE 1_ atVC.. IN.- Mcpm EF. 1E, mu sawl rz t 1OV ha p POLEFOR EFENZA0 o. GAAVEL ACIA AH. pA IA .1411A0IEAE 1912 E/ 00AE . a/ IOC: A„ t k. I/.,/... wg« E ivo 2NCE Acus DAtE HIL03345 tEttANI IMAM PAMPA H105778 u.. AA1111007 PAHOA KALAPANA ROAD nE,Aia ENLARGED SHEPIAN COMPOUNDND PLAN I A- 2 COMPOUND PLAN k=I2 ENLARGED SITE PLAN „ t„ , tX, EES I`. e GPS ANTENNA MOUNTED TO M E% RRIOR Cf SMELTER PI NVAC UNIT. TYP. REFER TO MANUFACTURER iDRAWINGS PREPARED FOR r„ AT& T WbKANFIU AWMNE tARAM.. 9410 I rC IP) CA61NG AND EOUIRMENTMLST EE NSTML AND USED ACCORDANCE WWETIE PRODUCTS INCLUDED RDRUCTIONS L6TKl° INCLUDED& AND/ OR T EEWIARG REQEASEMPER NEC SECTION 110311). 2. ALL P) CASING CONFORMS " ATMANO4TOEE INSTALLED PERNEC756.IO & 356.12. 3 OATS ARE SIAM ED ANO STAOGEPFO TOFI. A. ALL in ANTENNAS. EQUIPMENT. COAX. AAD ACCESSORB MOUNTED TO 194E ( I) OAONOPCILE SHALL TIE PARTED GREEN. 5. MT MONOPOLE STUNS BE PAINTED GREEN veno,, 151NFRA5TRUCTURE P7 A( 11 I.10ANA ELvD. 5TE91f NONCWUE. MNWAII9N13 s NGRCNa tor. I) PIPE EITPOION. M. ITOTNAT IDESGN eV PRIERS, 111 ANTENNA v. 6POM MOONING FRAME rACT L# 1j9 ' v J...- ::::..... r U5, 1 s.!• 7 LO 1 ' v--"' EL. r,, S'. 01 'AT&TMV % E P) GENERATOR FIEl00% ( FUEL ALARPAELREMM I— li1 .. I AC 11) EMERSON • NVPOWER PINRRACKwllblRECTIFIERS AATTE STRINGS RE AND ( 3OTE IP) ' IS::? PIESSION I° 7 F FRE I R80MF 6 IIP) PI IXW AC GENETERAOR W/ I@GALLON IANC II P FRE E% IP. GIU4EER I E3A MEM P. E, 1 I IAL IP10C12SURGESUPPRESSOR WRNN RAQ DOTAL - 3) CABLE ENTRY, M. P) II MRD RAQ TOTAL - 21 P) T116630eASERAN0 UNIT WITIN NYEWD RACK AT& T SND: HIL03345 I 71 Alp- PREiAERICAIED SADAIA•. 06616 NI SMELTER MO NTE° TO RAISED CONCRETE PAD C:. r LPILCWI I AUTOMATIC i 7RANYAR SWITCH P) ARE EMINC• U6FER OR , C n4. 7f^ P. v... P) PES& Pu( R SPILL or P106GONTECT SNRIOI WI cAMOCK GENERATOR PITEREACE MOUNTED PI RAISED CONCRETE STOOP ExtER10R a SIIRIO! IEICw I1) TELCO WARD..•. TO 1 36027/ 39 REDSEEA o a61nn 1oo1LfD A rATE vOb /Pt W 117 DAR DOCT,:%JTN IL PdI',,, . ET'• Ca` y `` I; p\/ y• r;' a II .\ .. ' 4 -. S 1yr • f. 1 _' W1 IP) AT& T OCb ISOM) SURGE ' ... r/ '' _ _• ./ ., WPPRES90R, TYP. IROMW) _ 1! P)' ATM' BACK TO SACK 101. 1 ; R; NI! MOUNT'. TYP. DOTAL - 18) '' * 1 µ` • dS.-. 14 IP) ' AT& T SECTOR IP) AT& T PANS ANTENNA * Y TIP. 3PLR SECTORRA P1• 12) Y 1 TRU. fYP, 9PER ROTA . 361PP. IU r` ____ STACKED) EQUIPMENT PLANis.1 2 W4 7, 10'10'. T Ucenix • I- f Esq.I. 4iiuJWJ IIIII• wr A Td' UVO N WO .. .- m 4 f-' 3d .:: CUT Ct: mood far \ 1II HIL03345 IEIIAM ESTATES 1331ROPANOAKAIAPANA RO PAHOA, N 96778 TMK: ( 3113000: 07 1._ ISANI TEA ANTENNA & EQUIPMENT PLAN 24" Io - Ir A- 3 DIMENSION PLAN flr F-. 1 3 ANTENNA PLAN PREPAREDFOR AT& T StORANEW AVENUE WHAM MIASMA I. IPI TNTBNAS. EOVIPMEM, COAX. ANO ACCESSORIES MONRED TONE IPI MONOrOLE 91, 44 SEP , NIW GREEN. PJ EAONOPCNESNALL RE PAw1EDGRF[ N. a ATI RPU' S1AN' S AND SURGE APPSTTcR3 NOT DEP: CIED N INS VAEw FOR CLARR' F. FOR IOGT10Nt OF HIDE RENS. PLEASE RPFRTO PREVIOLIS PLANS VEWS YAWN THE ORAYNGSEI I O ( PI ANYEOPOTE STEEL! NT ELEV. IpOJ" IAGlI + I. NL IPI ANTENNAS. PO& PMEM. COAX. AND ACCESSORIES MOL)LTTDTOTAP (% MONOPOLE SHALL BEPARR® GREEN. 2 (% MONOPOLE SNAIL Pl PANRDGRENA A ' AT& T REV S TAWS AND SURGEARRESTORS NOT DEPICTED N ORS YEW FOR CNRRt. FOR LOCASOL$ OP TANS RENS. PlFASf REFER TO PREVIOUS PLANS YEWS WITHIN LEL: pRAwNGfEf T. O. MONOPOLE ST@Ll (%' A/ bT PANS ANRNNAS I%. - ETEV. MOO IA.O.I.IT Li_ CE_`1fP! L • qAI 1%' AT6T PASTEL ANIENNASRAOC— EM9L Val' gStNCRA57RUCFURE SF? ALA MOAN WAD SN917 HONOLULU. RAW/ 4131813 n_ OASIO tune. I% 1I I[H/AS:AD 1 -- MS ANTENNA 2PEXCLUSION DISTANCE. PAL ' SHOWN AS REFERENCEONO) PANEL 1% AT& T AMENIA TEP. JPPt SECTOR OIAl12! PI' Aibr IOU47 NGN MONOPOLE ROWER.',] TRUNCAPTES RRNH 2 ROUTED WIIIE'• I RI MONOPOLE I. O. (% : Hoff PON 4 IPI j -- IPI ANTENNA 29 EXCLUSION INSTANCE. IVP. ( SHOWN AS REFERENCE ONLY) IPI ANT PANEL AMOR,.M TIT. J PER SECTOR POAL, 12} PI • Atbr 100V NONMONOPOIE DC POWER. IP( FBEP TRUNK CAELES win. 7' epERpuCI ROUTED WITHINNHEROUCI IPI MDNOPOtF IPI T. O.( ry MU" POTS A16ISNe D: H I L03345 DRAWNBr: ) SG CNER: KED Br: IAN. I D A 08121119 RIOTREV 06102! 19 10] SEDI 01/! 19 907. IDI DATE OESCNPtION licenw. P tr. wr+ s.. r% AT& T POT6 HAY. 150" IAGLI 1 ELEV. 11941A. G.l.l AT& T Lawn. POLEFOR IPIUPLIFT TOR OVERHEAD POWER bNKR i ! IPI' Albr ; IAD, 1 EOWPMBFT WELTER T. O. IP) SHELTER I% AT& T CABLE I C.. F BRIDGEi " PT OVERHEAD POWER bSBFR RI AMMTSAM IA EOUPAEM SEEDER I f.0.% SNEl117R t,.1. 0$ IAGLJ 4 huTIT.IP HIL03345 IEIUM ESTATES 3620 PAHOA KA% APANA RD PAHOA, ER 96778 TMK: 1811 SODIA07 I BEV. TEAS' IA.G.LT I It T. O. pi CHAAiteaLKE/ INCE 111 E T. O. IP) CNANERLK PENCE Sheet ELFv.d0'14.G.L.1r r lin FECIONGCH T LWR FENCE ViPRIVACV DAY REWN ORADE 60 HON CRON GNAW UM'ENGEM, PNYACY SLATS IIIELEVATIONS MINI .® Sheol easHEOCR774, N.. bw: BRIA. 0 IPI ATV' ' 2J" wx IIAr.. L. FE,CE D C. BLE St9+ k: c...: Et,:, RE E.. NA't GO, C.3 2 WEST ELEVATION "= 6,.• IF EAST ELEVATION Makenzie Bandstra From: tawernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Friday, May 22 2020 1:46 PM To: Makenzie Bandstra Subject: Section 106 New Filing Submitted- Email ID #4631872 The following new Section 106 tiling has been submitted: File Number: 0009088553 TCNS Number: 204964 Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 05/26/2020 Applicant: AT&T Mobility, LLC Consultant: EnviroBusiness Inc. d/b/a EBI Consulting (EBI 6120001112) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: LEILANI ESTATES / 14IL03345 FA 10553982 Site Address: 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a new telecommunications monopole tower and compound resulting in ground disturbance. Please see Attachment 4 of this filing for project design details. 6120001112) Site Coordinates: 19-26-23.8 N, 154-56-42.5 W City: Pahoa County: HAWAII State:HI Lead SHPO/THPO: State Historic Preservation Office Consultant Contact Information: Name: EnviroBusiness Inc. d/b/a EBI Consulting (EBI 6120001112) Title: Architectural Historian PO Box: Address: 6876 Susquehanna Trail S City: York State: PA Zip: 17403 Phone: 717-472-3070 Fax: Email mbandstra@ebiconsulting.com NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. 5/222020 UPS CampusShip - United States UPS Campusship: ViewlPrint Label 1. Ensure there are no other shipping or tracking labels attached to your package. Select the Pdnt button on the print dialog box that appears. Note: If your browser does not support this function select Print from the File menu to print the label. 2 Fold the printed label at the solid line below. Place the label In a UPS Shipping Pouch. If you do not have a pouch, affix the folded label using clear plastic shipping tape over the entire label. 3. GETTING YOUR SHIPMENT TO UPS Customers with a Daily Pickup Your dhver will pickup your shipment's) as usual. Customers without a Daily Pickup Take your package to any location of The UPS Store®, UPS Access Point(TM) location, UPS Drop Box, UPS Customer Center. Staples® or Authorized Shipping Outlet near you. Items sent via UPS Return Services(SM) including via Ground) are also accepted at Drop Boxes. To find the location nearest you, please visit the Resources area of Campusship and select UPS Locations. Schedule a same day or future day Pickup to have a UPS driver pickup alt your Campus5hip packages. Hand the package to any UPS driver in your area. UPS Access Punt THE UPS STORE 101 MIDDLESEX TRIBE BURLINGTON NIA 01003 FOLD HERE UPS Access Points" CVS STORE # 5939 242 CAMBRIDGE ST BURLINGTON .MA 01803 UPS Access PointTM THE UPS STORE 101 GREAT RD BEDFORD MA 01730 CIIRIS'IINAMCGOIMGLE 1 LBS 1 OF 1 7814255/02 EBICOt2121851' BURLINGTONMA01803 5HIP ALANDOWNER 808692-8015 HISTATEHISTORICPRESERVATION 601KAMOKILABLVD., SUITE555 KAPOLEIHI96707-2037 ri UPS2NDDAYAIR 2 TRACKING #: 1ZX612240291639735 BILLING: P/P Reference # 2: 612001UH oo ' e tl ^^ : oxo 1--— L Reference # 2: 6120001112 —[-- a\ r. W/k V, Z at t RCi htlps:/Avww.cam Wsship.ups.wMcship/createpActionOriginPairedefault PdntWlndowPagedkeyulabelWindowStype=html&loc=en_USBinstr=ABdo... 1/1 APPENDIX D: TRIBAL CORRESPONDENCE SUMMARY EBI Consulting A environmental engineering I due diligence 21 B Street Burlington. MA 01803 Tel: (781) 273-2500 Fax: (781) 273-3311 wwwb nsulting.com June 18, 2020 Re: Tribal Correspondence Summary Letter HIL03345 FA 10553982/ LEILANI ESTATES 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD, Pahoa, Hawaii County, Hawaii EBI Project #6120001 1 12 Overview The purpose of this Tribal Correspondence Summary (Tribal Summary) letter is to summarize pertinent correspondence between EBI Consulting (EBI) and Native American Indian Tribes with regard to the above - referenced proposed wireless communications facility. In accordance with §I.1307(a)(5) of the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementing procedures, the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) is required for proposed antenna structures which may significantly affect Indian religious sites. This Tribal Summary letter summarizes EBI's efforts, through communications with potentially interested Tribes, to evaluate the potential effects of the proposed facility on Indian religious sites and presents the findings and conclusions of this effort Methodology EBI utilized the FCC's Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) to provide project details and pertinent supporting documentation to federally recognized Native American Indian Tribes that had previously indicated an interest in receiving notifications on projects within project vicinity. In accordance with the provisions set forth in the FCC's March 30, 2018 Second Report and Order in the matter of Accelerating Wireless Broadband Deployment by Removing Barriers to infrastructure Investment (2nd R&O), EBI forwarded a copy of the applicable FCC Form (or appropriate alternative submission package) to each potentially interested Native American Indian Tribe identified through TCNS. EBI forwarded this documentation in a manner consistent with the individual communication preferences of each Tribe, as stipulated in the automated Notice of Organizations (NOO) email generated by the TCNS. This documentation included an archaeological assessment and photographs of the project site. Findings & Conclusions Federal -Recognized Tribes Please note the below -listed tribes have requested construction monitoring. It is the opinion of EBI that based on the information reviewed, sufficient justification exists to warrant archaeological monitoring at the site during ground disturbing activities. Office of Hawaiian Affairs As of the date of this letter, all Native American Indian Tribes notified of the project using the FCC's TCNS system have either (i) responded as having no further interest in review; (ii) have pre -established procedures for which the project meets a'no interest criteria; or (iii) have exceeded the mandated comment period. Accordingly, under the provisions set forth in FCC NEPA Rules and the 2nd R&O, the Applicants pre -construction obligations are discharged with respect to these Native American Indian Tribes. In the event that a concentration of artifacts or culturally modified soil deposits (including trash pits older than 50 years) are encountered at any time during ground disturbing activities, all work must stop until a qualified archaeologist views the finds and makes a preliminary evaluation. If warranted, further archaeological work in the discovery area should be performed. Although unlikely, if human remains are encountered. all work must stop in the immediate vicinity of the discovery until the County Coroner and a qualified archaeologist evaluate the remains. As necessary, all Tribes identified during the consultation process will be notified of pertinent discoveries made during ground disturbing activities. Limitations The findings and conclusions summarized in this Tribal Summary letter are based on the project specifications provided to EBI. In the event that the design or location of the installation changes, additional review and/or consultation may be required. There are no intended or unintended third -party beneficiaries to this Tribal Summary letter, unless specifically named. EBI is an independent contractor, not an employee of either the property owner or the project proponent, and its compensation was not based on the findings or recommendations made in this document or on the closing of any business transaction. Thank you for the opportunity to assist you with this project. Please call us if you have any questions or if we may be of further assistance. Respectfully Submitted, Ms. Lilyan Curtis Author/Tribal Coordinator Attachments A i SPKLK. Ms. Steff Dansereau Reviewer/ Senior Tribal Coordinator Direct# (541) 973-9338 Tribal Correspondence Summary Table & FCC Notice of Organization Tribal Responses FCC TCNS & Referral Documentation Tribal Invitation to Consult Letters TRIBAL CORRESPONDENCE SUMMARY TABLE FCC NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION TRIBAL CORRESPONDENCE SUMMARY TABLE atiEBI Consulting EN project 11: SRCWmx ems, 20496e NOO Date: 4/ 24/ 2020 Trbe TCNS bon Reponse Request from Tribe yr stuNIng Agreement lett to Comment Letter Sent UpFollo,, Ahem Cenux peRequired Tripe Reponse FCC Referral Cvmmennl Actions CNLe or Ra„ anan neaxaaro. oe enm, m.. no pr 1142020 Reg to reviewp project May 7, 1010 aeourea pr> Ntt lmm n, tnn , em May 2 e. E020 rrvlo. up cnrespondencesen, lune L 2020 natUNna construction - nonose properoes idenlmm lune 9, 2010 N/p Monitor Jona tom„ ut, son. Lilyan Curtis v From: towernotifyinfo@fccgov Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 2:21 PM To: Lilyan Curtis Cc: tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #6887443 Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the notification that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). We note that the review period for all parties begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to Section VI I.A of the NPA and notifications that do not provide this serve as information only. Persons who have received the notification that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally -recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations"), Native Hawaiian Organizations NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. (NPA, Section IV.F.4). The notification that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. A Tribal Nation or NHO may not respond until a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow-up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond to a follow- up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NI-lO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18-30). 1. Compliance Enforcement Anita C Manzano - Office of Hawaiian Affairs - 560 N. Nimitz Hwy., Suite 200 Honolulu, HI - anitam@oha.org - 808-594-1755 - electronic mail and regular mail Exclusions: The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) is not interested in reviewing TCNS projects that involve the replacement of existing structures on rooftops or buildings; the installation of new structures on rooftops or buildings; or, projects that do not involve ground disturbing work. The notification that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VII.A of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under Section 111 D or E of the NPA. 2. Chairperson Suzanne D Case - Department of Land & Natural Resources -1151 Punchbowl Street - Room 220 Honolulu, I-11 - suzanne.case@hawaii.gov; Russell.Y.Tsuji@hawaii.gov - 808-587-0401- regular mail 3. Deputy SHPO Theresa K Donham - State Historic Preservation Office - 601 Kamokila Blvd Room 555 Kapolei, HI - theresa.k.donham @hawaii.gov - 808-692-8015 - electronic mail TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. In addition, a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain facilities (for example, a statement that it does not review collocations with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre -construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn that any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: Notification Received: 04/16/2020 Notification ID: 204964 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: AT&T Mobility, LLC Consultant Name: Lilyan 1 Curtis Street Address: 195 East B Street City: Benicia State: CALIFORNIA Zip Code: 94510 Phone: 707-208-7786 Email: lcurtis@ebiconsulting.com Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 19 deg 26 min 23.8 sec N Longitude: 154 deg 56 min 42.5 sec W Location Description: 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD City: Pahoa State: HAWAII County: HAWAII 2 Detailed Description of Project: Proposed construction of a new telecommunications monopole tower and compound resulting in ground disturbance. Please see Attachment 4 of this filing for project design details. (6120001112) Ground Elevation: 319.7 meters d.. Support Structure: 30.5 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 30.5 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 350.2 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/available-support-services You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480-3201 (TTY 717-338-2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission 3 TRIBAL RESPONSES Lilyan Curtis From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Aloha, OHACompliance @oha.org <ohacompliance@oha.org> Tuesday, lune 9, 2020 1:38 PM Lilyan Curtis Kamakana Ferreira RE: 204964 (6120001112) - 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road Follow up Flagged The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) is responding to you regarding concerns for the project area located at 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road. According to your site information a 100 -foot monopole tower will be installed and associated support equipment within an approximately 35 -foot by 30 -foot lease area. OHA has concerns as the report notes the proposed project is atop a prior lava flow. According to the Cultural Resources Report the methodology only included a literature review and pedestrian survey of the surface and concluded that there are no historic properties in the project area or surrounding areas. OHA is aware of lava tubes to the north that contain mass historic burials. OHA maintains the possibility of encountering lava tubes in the project area that may or may not contain burials, therefore OHA is recommending archaeological monitoring be conducted during any ground disturbances. Please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Mahalo, Kathy Kathryn Keala Phone: 808-594-0272 From: Lilyan Curtis <Icurtis@ebiconsulting.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 11:49 AM To: Anita Manzano <anitam@oha.org> Subject: 204964 (6120001112) - Invitation to Comment - E106 Invitation to Comment in Section 106 Consultation RE: Process TCNS Reference #: 204964 TCNS Date: April 24, 2020 Site Identifier: Site Address: EBI Project Number. Project Description: LEILANI ESTATES / HIL03345 FA 10553982 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD Pahoa, Hawaii County, Hawaii, 96778 6120001112 f TRIBAL INVITATION TO COMMENT LETTERS 1 Lilyan Curtis To: Anita Mania no Subject 204964 (6120001112) - Invitation to Comment - E106 Attachments: 6120001112 El 06.pdf Invitation to Comment in Section 106 Consultation RE: Process TCNS Reference #: 204964 TCNS Date: April 24, 2020 Site Identifier: LEILANI ESTATES / HIL03345 FA 10553982 Site Address: 13-3820 PANDA KALAPANA RD Pahoa, Hawaii County, Hawaii, 96778 EBI Project Number: 6120001112 Project Description: Hello: Proposed construction of a new telecommunications monopole tower and compound resulting in ground disturbance. Please see Attachment 4 ofthis filing for project design derails. EBI Consulting (EBI) has been retained to complete a review of the above -referenced proposed wireless installation for compliance with the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) implementing procedures. In accordance with the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) guidance contained within the Second Report and Order dated May 3, 2018, EBI has attached a complete copy of the FCC Form (or appropriate alternative) and its required attachments. The information contained in this documentation meets the requirements outlined by the FCC. EBI would like to inquire if you would be interested in commenting on this proposed installation, and specifically whether historic properties of religious or cultural significance to your tribe may be affected by this undertaking. Please forward any comments, questions or concerns you may have to me at the phone number or email address below. Respectfully submitted, From: Anita Manzano <anitam@oha.org> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 202010:48 AM To: Lilyan Curtis <lcurtis@ebiconsulting.com> Subject: RE: TCNS 204964; 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Puna, Hawaii Aloha Lilyan, Thank you so much for your email and for the info. Greatly appreciated. looking forward to hearing from you. Mahalo, Anita C. Manzano Ka Pou Alo to the Ka Pou Kako'o Kia'i Kanawai 1 Compliance Enforcement State of Hawai'i I Ka Pala Ku 1 Advocacy 1 Office of Hawaiian Affairs 560 N. Nimitz Hwy., Suite 200 1 Honolulu, HI 96817 V: (808) 594-1755 A: (808) 594-1825 5J: anitam@oha.org IA From: Lilyan Curtis Imailto:Icurtis@ebiconsulting.com] Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 7:25 AM To: Anita Manzano <anitam@oha.org> Subject: RE: TCNS 204964; 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Puna, Hawaii Hello Anita, Thank you for expressing your interest in reviewing this project. Our team is still working on an E106 report that will be sent your way for review the moment it has been finalized, which will contain a full environmental and archeological survey of the site. If there is other, supplemental information needed after your review, please consult with me. Thank you for your patience. Enjoy the rest of your day, Lilyan Curtis Tribal Coordinator P. (707) 208 — 7786 21 B Street 1 Burlington, MAI 01803 Icurtis @ebi co nsu It ing.com Visit our website: www.ebiconsultinq.com AenvgeonmtnIAI 1 •ng n ..ng d«tvpn EBI Consulting Please consider the environment before printing this email From: TCNShelp <TCNShelp@fcc.gov> Sent: Thursday, May 7, 2020 9:51 AM To: Lilyan Curtis <Icurtis@ebiconsulting.com> Cc: Joel le Gehring cJoelle.Gehring@fcagov> Subject: FW: RE: TCNS 204964; 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Puna, Hawal i Reps at EBI, Please see request from OHA below. Thank you - From: Anita Manzano <anitam@oha.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2020 2:26 PM To: TCNShelp <TCNShelp@fcc.gov> Subject: FW: RE: TCNS 204964; 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Puna, Hawai'i Aloha and Good Morning, 2 May I request additional information for the above mentioned subject matter at the Pahoa Kalapana Road project? and while I'm at it, I would also like to request a map that shows proximity of the project to known lava tubes. This project is just outside 0HA's property, Puna forest Reserve (aka Waokele o Puna) in Puna, Hawaii Your kind consideration to this request is greatly appreciated. Looking forward to hearing from you. Mahalo, Anita C. Manzano Ka Pou Alo to the Ka Pou Kako'o Kia'i Kanawai 1 Compliance Enforcement State of Hawaii 1 Ka Paia Ku 1 Advocacy 1 Office of Hawaiian Affairs S60 N. Nimitz Hwy., Suite 200 1 Honolulu, HI 96817 IN (808) 594-1755 A: (808) 594-1825 IR: anitam@oha.orp 3 Lilyan Curtis From: Microsoft Outlook To: Anita Manza no Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 2:49 PM Subject: Relayed: 204964 (6120001112) - Invitation to Comment - E106 Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the destination server: Anita Manzano (anitam@oha.oml Subject: 204964 (6120001112) - Invitation to Comment - E106 L Lilyan Curtis To: Subject: Anita Manzano 204964 (6170001112) - Puna Forest Reserve - Map of Lava Tubes Good Afternoon Anita, I am writing you this email to let you know that our biological and archaeological of lava tubes in the proximity of this project per your request. orking on creating a map If you need any other supplemental information or have any questions concerning this project, please let me know. Thank you! Lilyan Curtis Tribal Coordinator P. (707) 208 -- 7786 21 B Street Burlington, MA 1 01 803 Icu rti9@ebiconsa!tppo.epm Visit our website: wwwebiconsulting.com EBI Consulting a: { mgin4eting i deny* Please consider the environment before printing this email Lilyan Curtis From: Microsoft Outlook To: Anita Manzano Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 3:57 PM Subject: Relayed: 204964 (6120001112) - Puna Forest Reserve - Map of Lava Tubes Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the destination server: Anita Manzano (anitam(aoha.orol Subject: 204964 (6120001112) - Puna Forest Reserve - Map of Lava Tubes Lilyan Curtis r From: TCNShelp <TCNShelpgdiccgov> Sent Thursday, May 7, 2020 9:51 AM To: hilyan Curtis Cc Joel le Gehring Subject: FW: RE: TCNS 204964; 13-3820 Policia Kalapana Road, Puna, Hawaii Reps at EBI, Please see request from OHA below. Thank you - From: Anita Manzano <anitam@oha.org> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2020 2:26 PM To: TCNShelp <TCNShelp@fcc.gov> Subject: FW: RE: TCNS 204964; 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana Road, Puna, Hawaii Aloha and Good Morning, May 1 request additional information for the above mentioned subject matter at the Pahoa Kalapana Road project? and while I'm at it, I would also like to request a map that shows proximity of the project to known lava tubes. This project is just outside OHA's property, Puna Forest Reserve (aka Waokele o Puna) in Puna, Hawai'i. Your kind consideration to this request is greatly appreciated. Looking forward to hearing from you. Mahalo, Anita C. Manzano Ka Pou Alo to the Ka Pau Kako'o Kia'i Kanawai 1 Compliance Enforcement 1 Procurement Travel Specialist State of Hawai'i 1 Ka Paia Ku 1 Advocacy I Office of Hawaiian Affairs 560 N. Nimitz Hwy., Suite 200 1 Honolulu, HI 96817 1755 wi (808) 5944825 Cd: enitam@oha.org APPENDIX E: RESUMES r ag EBI Consulting environmental j engineering j due diligence Melissa Bauer Senior Scientist 21 B Street Burlington. MA 01803 Office: 602.463.1698 Summary of Experience Melissa Bauer, Senior Scientist has had extensive experience in the environmental field since 1999. Her experience includes conducting environmental site assessments, property condition assessments, asbestos surveys, lead-based paint surveys, limited indoor air quality evaluations, visual mold inspections, hazardous materials inspections, abatement/remediation project oversight and monitoring, clearance inspections and sampling, data management, watershed studies, and ecological projects as well as preparing reports and project documents. She has been assigned to projects involving remedial investigations with tasks including groundwater and soil vapor sampling, monitoring well installations and development of wells. At EBI Consulting, Ms. Bauer serves as a Senior Scientist within the West Telecom Environmental group. Her primary responsibilities in this role include conducting Phase I ESAs and NEPA Compliance Reviews. Additionally, Ms. Bauer serves as the Phase I ESA Mentor for the West Telecom Environmental group. In this role Ms. Bauer is responsible for training and mentoring regional Scientists in conducting Phase I ESAs. Relevant Project Experience Ms. Bauer has prepared Phase I ESA Reports for a wide range of properties and clients. These assessments focused on evaluating site conditions, potential off-site liabilities, and environmental control systems in order to advise prospective buyers, operators, and owners of potential and existing environmental concerns. Her assessment experience includes industrial, commercial, utility, and telecommunications developments. In addition to environmental assessments, Ms. Bauer has extensive experience completing NEPA Compliance Reviews, asbestos and lead surveys, Phase II ESAs (subsurface investigations), and limited microbial surveys. Education BS, Environmental Science, University of Maryland - Baltimore County Professional Registrations OSHA 40 -Hour Hazardous Materials Training OSHA 30 -Hour Construction Class EPA AHERA Certified Building Inspector/Contractor Supervisor/Management Planner/Project Designer California Certified Asbestos Consultant (CAC) Asbestos Abatement Consultant — State of Nevada Asbestos Inspector — State of Utah EPA Certified Lead Inspector/Risk Assessor — States of Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Region 9 Tribal Lands Niton Certificate of Achievement 8 -Hour Current Understanding and Advances in Mold Assessment, Sampling and Analysis 20 -Hour Microbial Investigator/Consultant Training OSHA RF Site Safety Awareness Trained Aa EBI Consulting environmental 1 engineering 1 due diligence Tama Troutman Project Scientist 6876 Susquehanna Trail South York, PA 17403 Mobile: 717991 9541 SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Tama Troutman, Project Scientist, has extensive experience specializing in environmental investigations, site assessments, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reports for the telecommunication industry since 2014. Additionally, Ms. Troutman, under her previous title RF-EME Technician, was primarily responsible for theoretical radio frequency (RF) modeling and on-site RF monitoring since 2013. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENTS: Ms. Troutman has conducted ASTM and Client -specific Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Preliminary Environmental Site Screenings, and soil sampling for various clients at a variety of properties throughout the United States. These properties have included industrial, manufacturing, commercial, retail, telecommunications facilities, and undeveloped land. Ms. Troutman has also performed asbestos surveys and conducted bulk lead-based paint sampling. Ms. Troutman has been conducting Environmental Site Assessments since 2014. NEPA SCREENING REPORTS: Ms. Troutman has prepared NEPA Screening Reports for telecommunication sites throughout the Mid -Atlantic, Northeast, Southeast regions. These reports include an analysis of historic properties, wetlands, endangered species habitats, floodplains, and other sensitive areas of environmental concern where there is the potential for impact from the installation of cellular equipment. Ms. Troutman has been preparing NEPA Screen Reports since 2014. RADIO FREQUENCY MONITORING AND THEORETICAL MODELING REPORTS: Ms. Troutman has conductd electromagnetic energy monitoring at telecommunication sites to determine the levels of radiation being emitted from antennas and associated equipment. As a result of these surveys, her work has included preparing compliance reports for telecommunication companies and deploying appropriate notification at the sites to meet OSHA, FCC, and local requirements. Ms. Troutman has performed theoretical RF modeling, which models the risk of RF-EME exposures from wireless communications equipment in accordance to the FCC's standards. Ms. Troutman also performed quality control of RF-EME monitoring and RF-EME modeling compliance reports. Ms. Troutman has performed RF monitoring and modeling since 2013. EDUCATION B.A., Environmental Science, University of Pittsburgh PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS EPA/AHERA Certified Asbestos Inspector ad EBI Consulting A environmental !engineering 1 due diligence Elaine Langer Program Manager 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 Office: 617.715.DODD Mobile: 617.308 0000 Home: 781 200.7000 SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE Elaine Langer, Program Manager has extensive experience in environmental investigations and site assessments since 2007. In addition, Ms. Langer has extensive experience conducting NEPA land use survery and asbestos and lead paint assessments and sampling. RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE Environmental Site Assessments. Ms. Langer has conducted and managed ASTM Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments, Environmental Impact Assessments, ACM and LBP Surveys, and NEPA compliance reports for various clients for a variety of properties located in the northeastern United States. These properties have included industrial, commercial, retail and multi -family residential properties, as well as telecommunications sites. MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SITE ASSESSMENTS. In addition to environmental assessments, Ms. Langer has prepared NEPA land use surveys and Environmental Assessments for telecommunications sites throughout the northeastern United States. Environmental reviews include analysis of historic properties, wetlands, endangered/threatened species, critical habitat, floodplains and other areas of environmental concern and the possible impacts of cellular installations on these sensitive areas. WETLAND INVESTIGATIONS. Ms. Langer has experience with wetland surveys and permitting for telecommunications sites. Ms. Langer is formally trained in performing wetland delineations and identifying key wetland vegetation and soils. Additionally, Ms. Langer has performed long term mitigation of Wetland communities in the area of telecommunications towers. EDUCATION B.S., SUNY Environmental Science and Forestry (Environmental Forest Biology) PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS NYS Licensed Asbestos Building Inspector Wetland Delineation Certification, Rutgers University PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS PUBLICATIONS Attachment 12— Flood Hazard Report AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application N-zoz Property Information Flood Hazard Assessment Report COUNTY: HAWAII TMK NO: (3) 1-3-001:007 WATERSHED: KAAHAKINI; KILAUEA PARCEL ADDRESS: 13-3820 PAHOA KALAPANA RD PAHOA, HI 96778 Flood Hazard Information FIRM INDEX DATE: LETTER OF MAP CHANGE(S): FEMA FIRM PANEL - EFFECTIVE DATE: www.hawaiinfp.org HIL03345 Leilani Estates Notes: SEPTEMBER 29, 2017 NONE 1551661430F - SEPTEMBER 29, 2017 1551661440F - SEPTEMBER 29, 2017 THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN A TSUNAMI EVACUTION ZONE: NO FOR MORE INFO, VISIT: http://www.scd.hawaii.gov/ THIS PROPERTY 15 WITHIN A DAM EVACUATION ZONE: NO FOR MORE INFO, VISIT: http://dInreng.hawali.gov/dam/ Cscloaner: The Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) assumes no responsibility arising from e use, accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of any information contained in this report. Viewers/Users arc responsible for verifying theaccuracy of the inforrnatron and agree to indemnify the Dt NR, its officers, and enlpkl. ees from any liability which may arise from its use of its data or information. If this mop hos been identified os 'PRELIMINARY', please note that it is being provided for iatormohonol purposes and is not to be used for flood insurance rating. Contact your county floodplain manager for flood zone derro-:,no nOns to be usea for comphance with tarot fioodplain management regukmons. 0 600 1,200 ft FLOOD HAZARD ASSESSMENT TOOL LAVER LEGEND Note legend does not correspond with NFHL) SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - The 1% annual chance flood (100 - year), also know as the base flood, is the flood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. SFHAs include Zone A, AE, AH, A0, V, and VE. The Base Flood Elevation (BFE) is the water surface elevation of the 1% annual chance flood. Mandatory flood insurance purchase applies ir these zones: Zone A: No BFE determined. Zone AE: BFE determined. Zona AH: Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); BFE determined. Zone AO: Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet flow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. Zona V: Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); no BFE determined. Zone VE: Coastal flood zone with velocity hazard (wave action); BFE determined. Zona AEF: Floodway areas ir Zone AE. The floodway is the channel of stream plus any adjacent floodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance flood can be carried without increasing the BFE. NON -SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA - Ar area in a low -to -moderate risk flood zone. No mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply, but coverage is available in participating communities. Zone XS (X shaded). Areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. ZOOID X: Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain OTHER FLOOD AREAS Zone D: Unstudied areas where flood hazards are undeter- mined, but flooding is possible. No mandatory flood insurance purchase apply, but coverage is available in participating commu- nities. r Attachment 13— AT&T Option & Land License - redacted AT&T Mobility Site HIL03345 Leilani Estates Conditional Use Permit Application Minket: RSDL C<II Site Number H1103345 C444 Site Name: LEILANI ESTATES Scarth Ring Name: HII03345 LEILANI ESTATES Fixed Mgd Number: 10553982 OPTION AND LAND LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS OPTION AND LAND LICENSE AGREEMENT ("Agreement"), dated as of the latter of the sigaamre dates below (the Effective Date"), is entered into by Sanford's Service Center, Inc., a Hawaii corporation, having a mailing address of P. O. Box 1321, Pahoa, Hawaii 96778 ("landlord") and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address of 1025 Lenox Part Blvd. NE, 3'd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30319 ("Tenant"). BACKGROUND Landlord owns or controls that certain plot, panel or tract of land, as described on Exhibit 1, together with all rights and privileges arising in connection therewith, located at 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapena Road, in the County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii (collectively, the "Property). Landlord desires to grant to Tenant the right to use a portion of the Property in accordance with this Agreement. The parties agree as follows: I. OPTION TO LICENSE. a) Landlord grants to Tenant an exclusive option (the "Option") w license a certain portion of the Property containing approximately 1050 (30' x 35') square feet including the air space above such ground space, as described on attached Exhibit 1, (the "licensed Ara"), for rhe placement of a Communication Facility, together with the easements described in Section 12 below, all in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. b) During the Option Term, and during the Term, Tenant and its agents, engineers, surveyors and other representatives will have the right to enter upon the Property to inspect. examine, conduct soil borings, drainage testing, material sampling radio frequency testing and other geological or engineering tests or studies of the Property (collectively, the "Testi %to apply for and obtain licenses, permits, approvals, or other relief required of or deemed necessary or appropriate at Tenant's sole discretion for its use of the Licensed Area and include, without limitation, applications for zoning variances, zoning ordinances, amendments, special use permits, and construction permits (collectively, the "Government Approvab"), initiate the ordering and/or scheduling of necessary utilities, and otherwise to do those things on or off the Property that, in the opinion of Tenant, are necessary in Terrmes sok discretion to detmnine the physical condition of the Property, the environmental history of the Property, landlord's title to the Property and the feasibility or suitability of the Property for Tenet's Permitted Use, all at Tenant's expense. Tenant will not be liable to Landlord or any third parry m account of any pm -existing defect or condition on or with respect to the Property, whether or nes such defect or condition is disclosed by Tenant's inspection. Tenant will restore the Property to its condition es it existed al the commencement of the Option Tetra, reasonable wear and tear and loss by casualty or other causes beyond Tenant's control excepted. c) In consideration of Landlord granting Tenant the Option, Tenant agrees to pay landlord the sum of = — al — — within thirty (30) business days after the Effective Date, The Option may be exercised during an initial term of one (1) year commencing on the Effective Date (the "Initial Option Term") which hen may be renewed by Tenant for an additional one (1) year (the "Renewal Option Term") upon written notification to Landlord and the payment of an _ - — • EOM no later than five (5) days prior to the expiration date of the Initial Option Term. The Initial Option Tenn and any Renewal Option Term are collectively referred to as the "Option Term." d) The Option may be sold, assigned or transferred at any time by Tenant without the written consent of landlord. Upon notification to Landlord of such sale, assignment or transfer, Tenant shall immediately 0013799040 VS. etl (,EL1m ESTATES) 0004 PS tad Lae AW « 1a' o.l)Maim be released from any and all liability under this Agreement, including the payment of any license fee or other sums due, without any further action. e) During the Option Term, Tenant may exercise the Option by notifying Landlord in writing. If Tenant exercises the Option, Then Landlord licenses the Licensed Area to Tenant subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. If Tenant does not exercise the Option during the Initial Option Tenn or any extension thereof, then this Agreement will terminate, and Ibe patties will have no further liability to each other. f) If during the Option Tenn, or during the Term if the Option is exercised, Landlord decides to subdivide, sell, or change the status of the zoning of the Licensed Area, the Property or any of Landlord's contiguous, adjoining or surrounding property (the "Surrounding Property"), or in the event of a threatened foreclosure on any of the foregoing, Landlord shall immediately notify Tenant in writing. Landlord agrees that during the Option Tenn, or during the Tenn if the Option is cxercised, Landlord shall not initiate or consent to any change in the zoning of the Licensed Area, the Property or the Surrounding Property or impose or consent to any other use or restriction that would prevent or limit Tenant from using the Licensed Area for the Permitted Use. Any and all terms and conditions of this Agreement that by their sense and context are intended to be applicable during the Option Tenn shall be so applicable. 2. PERMITTED USE. Tenant may use the Licensed Area for the transmission and reception of communications signals and the installation, construction, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement and upgrade of communications fixtures end related equipment, cables, accessonea and improvements, which may include a suitable support structure ("Structure"), associated antennas, equipment shelters or cabinets and fencing and any other items necessary to the successful and secure use of the Licensed Area (the Communleattoe Facility'', as well as the right to test, survey and review title on the Property; Tenant further has the right but not the obligation to add, modify and/or replace equipment in order to be in compliance with any current or future federal, state or local mandated application, including, but not limited to, emergency 911 communication services, (collectively, the "Permitted Ute"). landlord and Tenant agree that any portion of the Communication Facility that may be conceptually described on Exhibit 1 will not be deemed to lupi Tenant's Permitted Use. If Exhibit 1 includes drawings of the initial installation of the Communication Facility, Landlord's execution of this Agreement will signify Landlord's approval of Exhibit 1. For a period of ninety 90) days following the star of construction, Landlord grants Tenant, its subtenants, licensees and sublicensecs, the right to use such portions of the Surrounding Property as may reasonably be required during construction and installation of the Communication Facility. Tenant hes the right to install and operate transmission cables from the equipment shelter or cabinet to the antennas, electric lines from the main feed to the equipment shelter or cabinet and communication lines from the Property's main entry point to the equipment shelter or cabinet, install a generator and to make other improvements, alterations, upgrades or additions appropriate for Tenant's Permitted Use, including the right to construct a fence around the Licensed Am or equipment, install warning signs to make individuals aware of risks, install protective barriers, instal any other control measures reasonably required by Tenant's safety procedures or applicable law, and undertake any other appropriate means to secure the Licensed Area or equipment at Tenant's expense. Tenant has the right to modify, supplement, replace, upgrade, expand the Communication Facility (including, for example, increasing the number of antennas or adding microwave dishes) er relocate the Communication Facility within the Licensed Area at any time during the Tenn. Tenant will be allowed to make such alterations to the Property in order to ensure that the Communication Facility complies with ell applicable federal, slate or local laws, rules or regulations. In the event Tenant desires to modify or upgrade the Communication Facility, in a manner that requires an additional porion of the Property (the "Additional Lletmed Area") for such modification or upgrade, Landlord agrees to license to Tenant the Additional Licensed Area, upon the same terms and conditions set forth herein, except that the License Fee shall increase, in conjunction with the license of the Additional Licensed Area by the amount equivalent to the then -current per square foot license fee rate charged by Landlord to Tenant times the square footage of the Additional Licensed Arca. Landlord agrees to take such actions and enter into and deliver to Tenant such docwnents as Tenant reasonably requests in order to effect and memorialize the license of the Additional Licensed Area to Tenant. 1001379904) 2 Mgq r (I villa.] ESTATES) Weft IS Laid Liam Armnu (mnAbal. wean 3. TERM. a) The initial license term will be five (5) years (the "Initial Tenn"), commencing on the effective date of written notification by Tenant to Landlord of Tenant's exercise of the Option (the "Tenn Commencement Date"). The Initial Term will terminate on the fifth (5th) anniversary of the Term Commencement Date. b) This Agreement will automatically renew for five (5) additional five (5) year term(s) (each additional five (5) year tent shall be defined as an "Extension Term"), upon the same terms and conditions set forth herein unless Tenant notifies Landlord in writing ofTenant's intention not to renew this Agreement at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration ofthe initial Term or the then -existing Extension Tenn. c) Unless (i) Landlord or Tenant notifies the other in writing of its intention to terminate this Agreement at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of the final Extension Tenn, or (ii) the Agreement is terminated as otherwise permitted by this Agreement prior to the end ofthe final Extension Term, this Agreement shall continue in force upon the same covenants, terms and conditions for a further term of one (1) year, and for annual terms thereafter ("Annual Term") until terminated by either party hereto by giving to the other party hereto written notice of its intention to so terminate at least six (6) months prior to the end of any such Annual Term. Monthly rent during such Annual Terms shall be equal to the License Fee paid for the last month of the final Extension Term. If Tenant remains in possession of the Licensed Area after the termination of this Agreement, then Tenant will be deemed to be occupying the Licensed Area on a month-to-month basis (the Holdover Term"), subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. d) The Initial Term, any Extension Terms, any Annual Terms and any Holdover Term are collectively referred to as the "Term." 4. LICENSE FEE. a) Commencing on the first day of the month following the date that Tenant commences construction (the "License Fee Commencement Date"), Tenant will pay Landlord on or before the fifth (56) day of each calendar month in advance, (the "License Fee"), at the address set forth above. In any partial month occurring after the License Fee Commencement Date, the License Fee will be prorated. The initial License Fee payment will be forwarded by Tenant to Landlord within forty-five (45) days after the License Fee Commencement Date. b) Upon the commencement of each Extension Term, the monthly License Fee will increase by flyer the License Fee paid during the previous five (5) year teen. c) All charges payable under this Agreement such as utilities and taxes shall be billed by Landlord within one (1) year from the end of the calendar year in which the charges were incurred; any charges beyond such period shall not be billed by Landlord, and shall not be payable by Tenant. The foregoing shall not apply to the monthly License Fee which is due and payable without a requirement that it be billed by Landlord. The provisions of this subsection shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 5. APPROVALS. a) Landlord agrees that Tenant's ability to use the Licensed Area is contingent upon the suitability of the Licensed Area and Property for the Permitted Use and Tenant's ability to obtain and maintain all Government Approvals. Landlord authorizes Tenant to prepare, execute and file all required applications to obtain Government Approvals for the Permitted Use and agrees to reasonably assist Tenant with such applications and with obtaining and maintaining the Government Approvals. b) Tenant has the right to obtain a title report or commitment for a leasehold title policy from a title insurance company of its choice and to have the Property surveyed by a surveyor of its choice. c) Tenant may also perform and obtain, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, soil borings, percolation tests, engineering procedures, environmental investigation or other tests or reports on, over, and under the Property, necessary to determine if Tenant's use of the Licensed Area will be compatible with Tenant's engineering specifications, system, design, operations or Government Approvals. 1001379904) 3 "pusudPG^AMESTAIES)apW.and L.et.ome Asmara lmI379004)_mea 6. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated, without penalty or further liability, as follows: / a) by either party on thirty (30) days prior written notice, if the other party remains in default under Section 15 of this Agmment after the applicable cure periods; b) by Tenant upon written notice to Landlord, if Tenant is unable to obtain, er maintain, any required approval(s) or the issuance of a license or permit by any agency, board, court or other governmental authority necessary for the constmction or operation of the Communication Facility as now or hereafter intended by Tenant; or if Tenant determines, in its sole discretion That the cost of or delay in obtaining or retaining the same is commercially unreasonable; c) by Tenant, upon written notice 10 Landlord, if Tenant determines, in its sole discretion, due to the title report results or survey results, that the condition of the Licensed Area is unsatisfactory for its intended uses; d) by Tenant upon written notice to Landlord for any reason or no reason, al any time prior to commencement of construction by Tenant; or e) by Tenant upon sixty (60) days' prior written notice to Landlord for any reason or no reason, so long as Tenant pays Landlord a termination fee equal to three (3) months' License Fee, et the then -current rate, provided, however, that no such termination fee will be payable on account of the termination of this Agreement by Tenant under any temrination provision curtained in any other Section of this Agreement, including the following; Section 5 Approvals, Section 6(a) Termination, Section 6(b) Termination, Section 6(c) Termination, Section 6(d) Termination, Section 11(d) Environmental, Section 18 Condemnation or Section 19 Casualty. 7. INSURANCE, During the Option Tenn and throughout the Term, Tenant will purchase and maintain in full force and effew such general liability policy as Tenant may deem necessary. Said policy of geneml liability insurance will at a minimum provide a combined single limit of One Million and No/100 Dollars 1,000,000.00), Notwithstsnding the foregoing. Tenant shag have the right to self -insure such general liability coverage. 8. INTERFERENCE, a) Prior to or concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, Landlord has provided or will provide Tenant with a list of radio frequency user(s) and frequencies used on the Property as of the Effective Dale. Tenant warrents that its use of the Licensed Arca will not interfere with those existing radio frequency uses on the Property, as long as the existing radio frequency user(s) operate and continue to operate within their respective frequencies and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations. b) Landlord will not grant, after the Effective Due, a lease, license or any cher right to any third parry, if the exercise of such grant may in any way adversely affect or interfere with the Communication Facility, the operations of Tenant or the rights of Tenant order this Agreement. Landlord will notify Tenant in writing prior to granting any third party the right to install and operate communications equipment on the Property. c) Landlord will not, nor will Landlord pennit its employees, tenants, licensees, invitees, agents or independent contractors to interfere in any way with the Communication Facility, the operations of Tenant or the rights of Tenant under this Agreement. Landlord will cause such interference to cease within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt of notice of interference from Tenant. In the event any such interference does not cease within the aforementioned cure period, Landlord shall cease ell operations which are suspected of causing interference; except for intermittent testing to determine the cause of such interference) until the interference hes been corrected. d) For the purposes of this Agreement, -interference" may include, but is not limited to, any use on the Property or Surrounding Property that causes electronic or physical obstruction with, or degradation of, the communications signals from the Communication Facility. 9. INDEMNIFICATIQN. a) Tenant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Landlord harmless from and against any and all injury, loss, damage or liability , costs or expenses in connection with a third parry claim (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) arising directly from the installation, use, maintenance, repair or removal of the Communication Facility or Tenant's breach of any provision of this Agreement, except to the extent attributable 001379904) 4 apm,caraeo ErtAtraaa. ewe n swaertcaumoa went to the negligent or intentional act or omission of Landlord, its employees, invitees, agents or independent contractors. b) Landlord agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Tenant harmless from and against any and all injury, loss, damage or liability , costs or expenses in connection with a third party claim (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) arising directly from the actions or failure to act of Landlord, its employees, invitees, agents or independent contractors, or Landlord's breach of any provision of this Agreement, except to the extent attributable to the negligent or intentional act or omission of Tenant, its employees, agents or independent contractors. c) The indemnified party: (i) shall promptly provide the indemnifying party with written notice of any claim, demand, lawsuit, or the like for which it seeks indemnification pursuant to this Section 9 and provide the indemnifying party with copies of any demands, notices, summonses, or legal papers received in connection with such claim, demand, lawsuit, or the like; (ii) shall not settle any such claim, demand, lawsuit, or the like without the prior written consent ofthe indemnifying party; and (iii) shall fully cooperate with the indemnifying party in the defense ofthe claim, demand, lawsuit, or the like. A delay in notice shall not relieve the indemnifying party of its indemnity obligation, except (I) to the extent the indemnifying party can show it was prejudiced by the delay; and (2) the indemnifying party shall not be liable for any settlement or litigation expenses incurred before the time when notice is given. 10. WARRANTIES. a) Each of Tenant and Landlord (to the extent not a natural person) each acknowledge and represent that it is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing and has the right, power, and authority or capacity, as applicable, to enter into this Agreement and bind itself hereto through the party or individual set forth as signatory for the party below. b) Landlord represents, warrants and agrees that: (i) Landlord solely owns the Property as a legal lot in fee simple, or controls the Property by lease or license; (ii) the Property is not and will not be encumbered by any liens, restrictions, mortgages, covenants, conditions, easements, leases, licenses or any other agreements ofrecord or not of record, which would adversely affect Tenant's Permitted Use and enjoyment of the Licensed Area under this Agreement; (iii) then Landlord grants to Tenant sole, actual, quiet and peaceful use, enjoyment and possession of the Licensed Area in accordance with the temps of this Agreement without hindrance or ejection by any persons lawfully claiming under Landlord ; (iv) Landlord's execution and performance of this Agreement will not violate any laws, ordinances, covenants or the provisions of any mortgage, lease license or other agreement binding on Landlord; and (v) if the Property is or becomes encumbered by a deed to secure a debt, mortgage or other security interest, then Landlord will provide promptly to Tenant a mutually agreeable subordination, non -disturbance and attornment agreement executed by Landlord and the holder of such security interest in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 10(b). 11. ENVIRONMENTAL. a) Landlord represents and warrants, except as may be identified in Exhibit 11 attached to this Agreement, (i) the Property, as of the Effective Date, is free of hazardous substances, including asbestos - containing materials and lead paint, and (ii) the Property has never been subject to any contamination or hazardous conditions resulting in any environmental investigation, inquiry or remediation. Landlord and Tenant agree that each will be responsible for compliance with any and all applicable governmental laws, rules, statutes, regulations, codes, ordinances, or principles of common law regulating or imposing standards of liability or standards of conduct with regard to protection of the environment or worker health and safety, as may now or at any time hereafter be in effect, to the extent such apply to that party's activity conducted in or on the Property. b) Landlord and Tenant agree to hold harmless and indemnify the other from, and to assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities at the sole cost and expense of the indemnifying party for, payment of penalties, sanctions, forfeitures, losses, costs or damages, and for responding to any action, notice, claim, order, summons, citation, directive, litigation, investigation or proceeding ("Claims"), to the extent arising from that party's breach of its obligations or representations under Section 11(a). Landlord agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Tenant from, and to assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities at the sole cost and expense of Landlord for, payment of penalties, sanctions, forfeitures, losses, costs or damages, and for responding to any 0013799041 5 Opu us a+a+M ESTATES) Option r Is" m Aeua RnTT+aorl neat* Claims, to the extent arising from subsurface or other contamination of the Property with hazardous substances prior to the Effective Date or from such contamination caused by the acts or omissions of Landlord during the Term. Tenant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Landlord from, and to assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities at the sole cost and expense of Tenant fm, payment of penalties, sanctions, forfeitures, losses, costs or damages, and for responding to any Claims, to the extent arising from hazardous substances brought onto the Property by Tenant. c) The indemnification provisions contained in this Section 11 specifically include reasonable costs, expense and fees incurred in connection with any investigation of Property conditions or any clean-up, rcmcdiation, removal or restoration work required by any governmental authority. The provisions of this Section 11 will survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement d) In the event Tenant becomes aware of any hazardous materials 011 the Property, or any environmental, health or safety condition or matter relating to the Pop./ ty, that, in Tenant's sole determination, renders the condition of the Licensed Ana or Property unsuitable for Tenant's use, or if Tenant bilines that the leasing or continued leasing of the Licensed Area would expose Tenant to undue risks of liability to a government agency or other third party, then Tenant will have the right, in addition to any other rights it may have at law or in equity, to terminale this Agreement upon written notice to landlord. 12. ACCESS At all times throughout the Term of this Agreement, Tenant, Tenant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors, will have the following access for the installation, maintenance, repair and operation of the Communication Facility (collectively, "Acca"), twenty-four (24) hour per day, seven (7) day per week, as depicted on Exhibit 1: (a) non-exclusive 12' wide pedestrian and vehicular gravel access from Pekoe Kalapana Road together with a 12' x 35' "T" gravel tmmmammrd abutting the Licensed Area; and (b) a non- exclusive 5' wide anility easement for the installation, maintenance, repairand operation of overhead electric and telecom utility lines serving the Licensed Area, from the utility pole on Palma Kalapana Road closest to the Licensed Area. As may be described more fully in Exhibit 1, Landlord grants to Tenant easements for such Access and landlord agrees to provide to Tenant such codes, keys and other instruments necessary for such Access to Tenant Upon Tenant's request, landlord will executes separate recordable easement evidencing these rights. Landlord shall execute a letter granting Tenant Access to the Property substantially in the form attached as Exhibit 12; upon Tenant's request, Landlord shall execute additional letters during the Term. If Tenant elects to utilize an Unmanned Aircraft System ("UAS") in connection with its installation, construction, monitoring. site audits, inspections, maintenance, repair, modification, or alteration activities at a Ptupeay, Landlord hereby grants Tenant, or any UAS operator acting on Tenant's behalf, express permission to fly over the applicable Property and Licensed Area, and consents to the use of audio and video navigation and recording in connection with the use of the UAS. Landlord acknowledges that in the event Tenant cannot obtain Access to the Licensed Area, Tenant shall incur significant damage If Landlord fails to provide the Access granted by this Section 12, such failure shall be a default under this Agreement In connection with such default, in addition to any other rights or reined les available to Tenant under this Agreement or at law or equity, Landlord shall pay Tenant, as liquidated damages and not as a penalty, $500 per day in consideration of Tenant's damage until Landlord cures such default. Landlord and Tenant awe that Tenant's damage in the event of a denial of Access are difficult, if not impossible, to ascertain, and the liquidated damages set forth above arc a reasonable approximation of such damages. 13. REMOVAL/RESTORATION, All portions ofthe Communication Facility brought onto the Property by Tenant will be and remain Tenant's personal property and, at Tenant's option, may be removed by Tenant at any time during or after the Term. landlord covenants and agree that no part of the Communication Facility constructed, erected or placed on the Licensed Area by Tenant will become, a be considered es being affixed to or a part of, the Property, it being the specific intention of Landlord that all improvements of every kind and nature constructed, erected or placed by Tenant on the Licensed Area will be and remain the property ofTenant and may be removed by Tenant at any time during or after the Tern. Tenant will repair any damage to the Property resulting from Tenant's removal activities. Any portions of the Communication Facility that Tenant docs not remove within one hundred twenty (120) days after the Tata of the end of the Tenn and cessation of 0013799041 6 aµm rasauaerArrs)as....eh..ntr M®(murs+w)_.am Tenant's operations at the Licensed Area shall be deemed abandoned and owned by Landlord. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Tenant will not be responsible for the replacement of any trees, shrubs or other vegetation. 14. MAINTENANCE/UTILITIES. a) Tenant will keep and maintain the Licensed Area in good condition, reasonable wear and tear and damage from the elements excepted. Landlord will maintain and repair the Property and access thereto and all areas of the Licensed Area where Tenant does not have exclusive control, in good and tenantable condition, subject to reasonable wear and tear and damage from the elements. Landlord will be responsible for maintenance of landscaping on the Property, including any landscaping installed by Tenant as a condition of this Agreement or any required permit. b) Tenant will be responsible for paying on a monthly or quarterly basis all utilities charges for electricity, telephone service or any other utility used or consumed by Tenant on the Licensed Area. In the event Tenant cannot secure its own metered electrical supply, Tenant will have the right, at its own cost and expense, to sub -meter from Landlord. When sub -metering is required under this Agreement, Landlord will read the meter and provide Tenant with an invoice and usage data on a monthly basis. Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for such utility usage at the same rate charged to Landlord by the utility service provider. Landlord further agrees to provide the usage data and invoice on forms provided by Tenant and to send such forms to such address and/or agent designated by Tenant. Tenant will remit payment within sixty (60) days of receipt of the usage data and required forms. Landlord shall maintain accurate and detailed records of all utility expenses, invoices and payments applicable to Tenant's reimbursement obligations hereunder. Within fifteen (15) days after a request from Tenant, Landlord shall provide copies of such utility billing records to the Tenant in the form of copies of invoices, contracts and cancelled checks. If the utility billing records reflect an overpayment by Tenant, Tenant shall have the right to deduct the amount of such overpayment from any monies due to Landlord from Tenant. c) As noted in Section 4(c) above, any utility fee recovery by Landlord is limited to a twelve (12) month period. IfTenant submeters electricity from Landlord, Landlord agrees to give Tenant at least twenty-four 24) hours advance notice of any planned interruptions of said electricity. Landlord acknowledges that Tenant provides a communication service which requires electrical power to operate and must operate twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week. If the interruption is for an extended period of time, in Tenant's reasonable determination, Landlord agrees to allow Tenant the right to bring in a temporary source of power for the duration of the interruption. Landlord will not be responsible for interference with, interruption ofor failure, beyond the reasonable control of Landlord, of such services to be furnished or supplied by Landlord. d) Tenant will have the right to install utilities, at Tenant's expense, and to improve present utilities on the Property and the Licensed Area. Landlord hereby grants to any service company providing utility or similar services, including electric power and telecommunications, to Tenant an easement over the Property, from an open and improved public road to the Licensed Area, and upon the Licensed Area, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining such lines, wires, circuits, and conduits, associated equipment cabinets and such appurtenances thereto, as such service companies may from time to time require in order to provide such services to the Licensed Area. Upon Tenant's or service company's request, Landlord will execute a separate recordable easement evidencing this grant, at no cost to Tenant or the service company. 15. DEFAULT AND RIGHT TO CURE. a) The following will be deemed a default by Tenant and a breach of this Agreement: (i) non- payment of License Fee if such License Fee remains unpaid for more than thirty (30) days after written notice from Landlord of such failure to pay; or (ii) Tenant's failure to perform any other term or condition under this Agreement within forty-five (45) days after written notice from Landlord specifying the failure. No such failure, however, will be deemed to exist ifTenant has commenced to cure such default within such period and provided that such efforts are prosecuted to completion with reasonable diligence. Delay in curing a default will be excused if due to causes beyond the reasonable control of Tenant. If Tenant remains in default beyond any applicable cure period, then Landlord will have the right to exercise any and all rights and remedies available to it under law and equity. b) The following will be deemed a default by Landlord and a breach of this Agreement: (i) Landlord's failure to provide Access to the Licensed Area as required by Section 12 within twenty-four (24) 00117990-9) 7 oqm sea axamn¢stnrrslOsiosmLad Lim Armco fmnrww)e_m hours after written notice of such failure; (ii) Landlord's failure to cure an interference problem as required by Section 8 within twenty-four (24) hours after written notice ofsuch failure; or (iii) Landlord's failure to perform any term, condition or breach ofany warranty or covenant under this Agreement within forty-five (45) days after written notice from Tenant specifying the failure. No such failure, however, will be deemed to exist if Landlord has commenced to cure the default within such period and provided such efforts are prosecuted to completion with reasonable diligence. Delay in curing a default will be excused if due to causes beyond the reasonable control of Landlord. If Landlord remains in default beyond any applicable cure period, Tenant will have: (i) the right to cure Landlord's default and to deduct the costs of such cure from any monies due to Landlord from Tenant, and (ii) any and all other rights available to it under law and equity. 16. ASSIGNMENT/SUBLICENSE. Tenant will have the right to assign this Agreement or sublicense the Licensed Area and its rights herein, in whole or in part, without Landlord's consent. Upon notification to Landlord of such assignment, Tenant will be relieved of all future performance, liabilities and obligations under this Agreement to the extent ofsuch assignment. 17. NOTICES. All notices, requests and demands hereunder will be given by first class certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight courier, postage prepaid, to be effective when properly sent and received, refused or returned undelivered. Notices will be addressed to the parties hereto as follows: If to Tenant: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Attn: Network Real Estate Administration Re: Cell Site #: HIL03345; Cell Site Name: LEILANI ESTATES (111) Fixed Asset #:10553982 1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE, 3'd Floor Atlanta, GA 30319 With a copy to: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Attn.: Legal Dept —Network Operations Re: Cell Site 11: HIL03345; Cell Site Name: LEILANI ESTATES (111) Fixed Asset #: 10553982 208 S. Akard Street Dallas, TX 752024206 The copy sent to the Legal Department is an administrative step which alone does not constitute legal notice. If to Landlord: Sanford's Service Center, Inc. P. O. Box 1321 Pahoa, 111 %778 Either party hereto may change the place for the giving of notice to it by thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the other party hereto as provided herein. 18. CONDEMNATION. In the event Landlord receives notification of any condemnation proceedings affecting the Property, Landlord will provide notice of the proceeding to Tenant within twenty-four (24) hours. If a condemning authority takes all of the Property, or a portion sufficient, in Tenant's sole determination, to render the Licensed Area unsuitable for Tenant, this Agreement will terminate as of the date the title vests in the condemning authority. The parties will each be entitled to pursue their own separate awards in the condemnation proceeds, which for Tenant will include, where applicable, the value of its Communication Facility, moving expenses, prepaid License Fees, and business dislocation expenses. Tenant will be entitled to reimbursement for any prepaid License Fees ono pro rata basis. r 10013799041 S cyto W (LEILANI ESTATh4)001im W lal lxmn AO®®(WllTpn.w Goa 19. CASUALTY. Landlord will provide notice to Tenant of any casualty or other harm affecting the Property within twenty-four (24) hours of the casualty or other harm. If any part ofthe Communication Facility or the Property is damaged by casualty or other hann as to render the Licensed Area unsuitable, in Tenant's sok determination, then Tenant may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to Landlord, which termination will be effective as of the date of such casualty or other harm. Upon such termination, Tenant will be entitled to collect all insurance proceeds payable to Tenant on account thereof and to be reimbursed for any prepaid License Fee on apro rata basis. Landlord agrees to permit Tenant to place temporary transmission and reception facilities on the Property, but only until such time as Tenant is able to activate a replacement transmission facility at another location; notwithstanding the termination of this Agreement, such temporary facilities will be governed by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, including License Fee. If Landlord or Tenant undertakes to rebuild or restore the Licensed Area and/or the Communication Facility, as applicable, Landlord agrees to permit Tenant to place temporary transmission and reception facilities on the Property until the reconstruction of the Licensed Area and/or the Communication Facility is completed. If Landlord determines not to rebuild or restore the Property, Landlord will notify Tenant of such determination within thirty (30) days after the casualty or other hare. If Landlord does not so notify Tenant and Tenant decides not to terminate under this Section 19, then Landlord will promptly rebuild or restore any portion of the Property interfering with or required for Tenant's Permitted Use of the Licensed Area to substantially the same condition as existed before the casualty or other harm. Landlord agrees that the License Fee shall be abated until the Property and/or the Licensed Area are rebuilt or restored, unless Tenant places temporary transmission and reception facilities on the Property. 20. WAIVER OF LANDLORD'S LIENS. Landlord waives any and all lien rights it may have, statutory or otherwise, concerning the Communication Facility or any portion thereof. The Communication Facility shall be deemed personal property for purposes of this Agreement, regardless of whether any portion is deemed real or personal property under applicable kw; Landlord consents to Tenant's right to remove all or any portion of the Communication Facility from time to time in Tenant's sole discretion and without Landlord's consent. 21. TAXES. a) Landlord shall be responsible for (i) all taxes and assessments levied upon the lands, improvements and other property of Landlord including any such taxes that may be calculated by a taxing authority using any method, including the income method, (ii) all sales, use, license, value added, documentary, stamp, gross receipts, registration, real estate transfer, conveyance, excise, recording, and other similar taxes and fees imposed in connection with this Agreement, and (iii) all sales, use, license, value added, documentary, stamp, gross receipts, registration, real estate transfer, conveyance, excise, recording, and other similar taxes and fees imposed in connection with a sale of the Property or assignment of the License Fee payments by Landlord. Tenant shall be responsible for (y) any taxes and assessments attributable to and levied upon Tenant's leasehold improvements on the Licensed Area if and as set forth in this Section 21 and (z) all sales, use, license, value added, documentary, stamp, gross receipts, registration, real estate transfer, conveyance, excise, recording, and other similar taxes and fees imposed in connection with an assignment of this Agreement or sublicense by Tenant. Nothing herein shall require Tenant to pay any inheritance, franchise, income, payroll, excise, privilege, license fee, capital stock, stamp, documentary, estate or profit tax, or any tax of similar nature, that is or may be imposed upon Landlord. b) In the event Landlord receives a notice of assessment with respect to which taxes or assessments are imposed on Tenant's leasehold improvements on the Licensed Area, Landlord shall provide Tenant with copies of each such notice immediately upon receipt, but in no event later than thirty (30) days after the date of such notice of assessment. If Landlord does not provide such notice or notices to Tenant in a timely manner and Tenant's rights with respect to such taxes are prejudiced by the delay, Landlord shall reimburse Tenant for anyincreasedcostsdirectlyresultingfromthedelayandLandlordshallberesponsibleforpaymentofthetaxor assessment set forth in the notice, and Landlord shall not have the right to reimbursement of such amount from Tenant. If Landlord provides a notice of assessment to Tenant within such time period and requests reimbursement from Tenant as set forth below, then Tenant shall reimburse Landlord for the tax or assessments identified on the notice of assessment on Tenant's leasehold improvements, which has been paid by Landlord. If Landlord seeks reimbursement from Tenant, Landlord shall, no later than thirty (30) days after Landlord's 001379914) 9 0$e W0a0wm rsrAmEi)0ps. r Wim COSY (0Gaa9Pa)_odeo payment of the taxes or assessments for the assessed tax year, provide Tenant with written notice including evidence that Landlord has timely paid same, and Landlord shall provide to Tenant any other documentation reasonably requested by Tenant to allow Tenant to evaluate the payment and to reimburse Landlord. c) For any tax amount for which Tenant is responsible under this Agreement, Tenant shall have the right to contest, in good faith, the validity or the amount thereof using such administrative, appellate or other proceedings as may be appropriate in the jurisdiction, and may defer payment of such obligations, pay same under protest, or take such other steps as permitted by law. This right shall include the ability to institute any legal, regulatory or informal action in the name of Landlord, Tenant, or both, with respect to the valuation ofthe Licensed Area. Landlord shall cooperate with respect to the commencement and prosecution of any such proceedings and will execute any documents required therefor. The expense of any such proceedings shall be borne by Tenant and any refunds or rebates secured as a result of Tenant's action shall belong to Tenant, to the extent the amounts were originally paid by Tenant. In the event Tenant notifies Landlord by the due date for assessment of Tenant's intent to contest the assessment, Landlord shall not pay the assessment pending conclusion of the contest, unless required by applicable law. d) Landlord shall not split or cause the tax parcel on which the Licensed Area are located to be split, bifurcated, separated or divided without the prior written consent of Tenant. e) Tenant shall have the right but not the obligation to pay any taxes due by Landlord hereunder if Landlord fails to timely do so, in addition to any other rights or remedies of Tenant. In the event that Tenant exercises its rights under this Section 2I (e) due to such Landlord default, Tenant shall have the right to deduct such tax amounts paid from any monies due to landlord from Tenant as provided in Section 15(b), provided that Tenant may exercise such right without having provided to Landlord notice and the opportunity to cure per Section 15(b). 0 Any tax -related notices shall be sent to Tenant in the manner set forth in Section 17. Promptly after the Effective Date, Landlord shall provide the following address to the taxing authority for the authority's use in the event the authority needs to communicate with Tenant. In the event that Tenant's tax address changes by notice to Landlord, Landlord shall be required to provide Tenant's new tax address to the taxing authority or authorities. g) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Section 21, Tenant shall have no obligation to reimburse any tax or assessment for which the Landlord is reimbursed or rebated by a third party. 22. SALE OF PROPERTY. a) Landlord may sell the Property or a portion thereof to a third party, provided: (i) the sale is made subject to the terms of this Agreement; and (ii) if the sale does not include the assignment of Landlord's full interest in this Agreement, the purchaser must agree to perform, without requiring compensation from Tenant or any subtenant, any obligation of Landlord under this Agreement, including Landlord's obligation to cooperate with Tenant as provided hereunder. b) If landlord, at any time during the Term of this Agreement, decides to rezone or sell, subdivide or otherwise transfer all or any part of the Licensed Area, or all or any part of the Property or the Surrounding Property, to a purchaser other than Tenant, Landlord shall promptly notify Tenant in writing, and such rezoning sale, subdivision or transfer shall be subject to this Agreement and Tenant's rights hereunder. In the event of a change in ownership, transfer or sale of the Property, within ten (10) days of such transfer, Landlord or its successor shall send the documents listed below in this Section 2222(b) to Tenant. Until Tenant receives all such documents, Tenant's failure to make payments under this Agreement shall not be an event of default and Tenant reserves the right to hold payments due under this Agreement. i. Old deed to Property ii. New deed to Property iii. Bill of Sale or Transfer iv. Copy of current Tax Bill v. New IRS Form W-9 vi. Completed and Signed Tenant Payment Direction Form vii. Full contact information for new Landlord including phone number(s) 1001379904) 10 repro- saw, r5TA aoumw rw u® Ainfmr mon +wan_@am c) Landlord agrees not to sell, lease, license or use any areas of the Property or the Surrounding Property for the installation, operation or maintenance of other wireless communication facilities if such installation, operation or maintenance would interfere with Tenant's Permitted Use or communications equipment as determined by radio propagation tests performed by Tenant in its sole discretion. Landlord or Landlord's prospective purchaser shall reimburse Tenant for any costs and expenses of such testing. If the radio frequency propagation tests demonstrate levels of interference unacceptable to Tenant, Landlord shall be prohibited from selling, leasing or using any areas of the Property or the Surrounding Property for purposes of any installation, operation or maintenance ofany other wireless communication facility or equipment. d) The provisions of this Section 22 shall in no way limit or impair the obligations of Landlord under this Agreement, including interference and access obligations. 23. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. Notwithstanding the provisions contained in Section 22, if at any time after the Effective Date, Landlord receives a bona fide written offer from a third party seeking any sale, conveyance, assignment or transfer, whether in whole or in part, of any property interest in or related to the Licensed Area, including without limitation any offer seeking an assignment or transfer of the License Fee payments associated with this Agreement or an offer to purchase an easement with respect to the Licensed Area Offer"), Landlord shall immediately famish Tenant with a copy of the Offer. Tenant shall have the right within ninety (90) days after it receives such copy to match the financial terms ofthe Offer and agree in writing to match such terms of the Offer. Such writing shall be in the form of a contract substantially similar to the Offer but Tenant may assign its rights to a third party. IfTenant chooses not to exercise this right or fails to provide written notice to Landlord within the ninety (90) day period, Landlord may sell, convey, assign or transfer such property interest in or related to the Licensed Area pursuant to the Offer, subject to the terms of this Agreement. If Landlord attempts to sell, convey, assign or transfer such property interest in or related to the Licensed Area without complying with this Section 23, the sale, conveyance, assignment or transfer shall be void. Tenant shall not be responsible for any failure to make payments under this Agreement and reserves the right to hold payments due under this Agreement until Landlord complies with this Section 23. Tenant's failure to exercise the right of first refusal shall not be deemed a waiver of the rights contained in this Section 23 with respect to any future proposed conveyances as described herein. 24. MISCELLANEOUS, a) Amendment/Waiver. This Agreement cannot be amended, modified or revised unless done in writing and signed by Landlord and Tenant No provision may be waived except in a writing signed by both parties. The failure by a party to enforce any provision of this Agreement or to require performance by the other party will not be construed to be a waiver, or in any way affect the right of either party to enforce such provision thereafter. b) Memorandum of License Contemporaneously with the execution of this Agreement, the parties will execute a recordable Memorandum of License substantially in the fonn attached as Exhibit 24(b). Either party may record this Memorandum of License at any time during the Tenn, in its absolute discretion. Thereafter during the Tenn, either party will, at any time upon fifteen (15) business days' prior written notice from the other, execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other a recordable Memorandum of License. c) Limitation of Liability. Except for the indemnity obligations set forth in this Agreement, and otherwise notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Tenant and Landlord each waives any claims that each may have against the other with respect to consequential, incidental or special damages, however caused, based on any theory of liability. d) Compliance with Law. Tenant agrees to comply with all federal, state and local laws, orders, rules and regulations ("Laws") applicable to Tenant's use of the Communication Facility on the Property. Landlord agrees to comply with all Laws relating to Landlord's ownership and use of the Property and any improvements on the Property. e) Riad and Benefit The temp and conditions contained in this Agreement will run with the Property and bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns. 001379904) 11 Osage .1,(MEANT ESTAra)weci-1 aim.Ar,mwrmmnoa) anima f) Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto, all being a part hereof, constitute the entire agreement of the parties hereto and will supersede all prior offers, negotiations end agreements with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. Exhibits are numbered to correspond t0 the Section wherein they are fast referenced. Except as otherwise stated in this Agreement, each party shall bear its own fees and expenses (including the fees and expenses of its agents, brokers, representatives, attorneys, and accountants) incurred in connection with the negotiation, drafting, execution and perfommoce of this Agreement and the transactions it contemplates. g) Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the state in which the Licensed Area are located, without regard to conflicts of law. h) Interpretation. Unless otherwise specified, the following rules of construction and interpretation apply: (i) captions are for convenience and reference only and in no way define or limit the construction of the terms and conditions hereof; (ii) use of the term "including" will be interpreted to mean including but not limited to"; (iii) wheneva a party's consent is required under this Agreement, except as otherwise stated in the Agreement oras same may be duplicative, such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; (iv) exhibits are an integral pert ofthis Agreement and are incorporated by reference into this Agreement; (v) use ofthc terms 'termination"or"expiration" are interchangeable; (vi) reference to a default will take into consideration any applicable notice, grace and cure periods; (vii) to the extent there is any issue with respect to any alleged, perceived or actual ambiguity in this Agreement, the ambiguity shall not be resolved on the basis of who drafted the Agreement; (viii) the singular use of words includes the plant what appropriate; and (ix) if any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force if the overall purpose of thc Agreement is not rendered impossible and the original purpose, intent or consideration is not materially impaired. i) Affiliates. All references to "Tenant" shall be deemed to Include any Affiliate of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC using the Licensed Area for any Permitted Use or otherwise exercising the rights of Tenant pursuant to this Agreement. "Affiliate" means with respect to a party to this Agreement, any person or entity that (directly or indirectly) controls, is controlled by, or under common control with, that petty. "Control" of a person or entity means the power (directly or indirectly) to direct the management or policies of that person or entity, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, by agency or otherwise. j) Survival. Any provisions of this Agreernent relating to indemnification shall survive the termination or expiration hereof. In addition, any terms and conditions contained in this Agreement that by their sale and context ate intended to survive the termination on capitation of this Agreement shall so survive. k) W-9. As a condition precedent to payment, Landlord agrees to provide Tenant with a completed IRS Form W-9, or its equivalent, upon execution of the Agreement and at such other times as may be reasonably requested by Tenant, including any change in Landlord's name or address. 1) Execution/No Opti. The submission of this Agreement to any party Thr examination or consideration does not constitute an offer, reservation of or option for thc Licensed Area based on the terms set forth herein. This Agreement will become effective as a binding Agreement only upon the handwritten legal execution, acknowledgment and delivery hereof by Landlord and Tenant. This Agreement nay be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, all of which shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective when one or mom counterparts have bean signed by each of the parties. All ponies need not sign thc same counterpart. m) Attorneys' Fen. In the event that any dispute between the patties related to this Agreement should result in litigation, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable fees and expenses of enforcing any right of the prevailing party, including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses. Prevailing party means the party deternined by the court to have most nearly prevailed even if such party did not prevail in all manor. This provision will not be construed to entitle any party other than Landlord, Tenant and their respective Affiliates to recover their fees and expenses. n) WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL. EACH PARTY, TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND INTENTIONALLY WAIVES ITS RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING UNDER ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS IT CONTEMPLATES. toorinvoat 12 Crowe .m(ras.vnctATtS)apwe.d land um„ rev.®.. (001379904). isdm o) No Additional Fees/ncidental Fees. Unless otherwise specified in this Agreement, all rights and obligations set forth in the Agreement shall be provided by Landlord and/or Tenant, as the case may be, at no additional cost. No unilateral fees or additional costs or expenses are to be applied by either party to the other party, for any task or service including, but not limited to, review of plans, structural analyses, consents, provision of documents or other communications between the parties. p) Further Acts. Upon request, Landlord will cause to be promptly and duly taken, executed, acknowledged and delivered all such further acts, documents, and assurances as Tenant may request from time to time in order to effectuate, carry out and perforin all ofthe terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement and all transactions and permitted use contemplated by this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be effective as of the Effective Date. loounsarl LANDLORD" Sanford's Service Center, Inc., a Hawaii corporation By: (7114"44169PatPrintName: frig S. hotly Its: Viet YNresident Date: 9/a7//9 TENANT' New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: AT&T Mobility Corporation Its: M By: Print Name: Its. i114..resXw4 Date: A\— 12-- ‘S ACKNOWLEDGMENTS APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE[ 13 oFm rd o co AM ESTKIES)Oplke and lad Lactose A..m.,IW1379W3)_a.— STATE OF HAWAII COUNTY OF HAWAII LANDLORD ACKNOWLEDGMENT SS: On thisday of 20 f 9 in the Third Circuit, State of Hawaii, before me personally meted S a' Ka to me personally known who, being by me duly tw'om or affirmed, did say that such person is the n - Pre 01'de-rot of SANFORD'S SERVICE CENTER, INC, a Hawaii corporation, that said person excused the foregoing instrument identified or described as Option and Land Licosa on behalf of the corporation by authority of its board of directors and such person acknowledged the instrument to be the fire act and deed ofsaid corporation. r---. 2ot9 The foregoing instrument is dated Z '9t.and contained _2-1 at the time of this aclmowledgmentictnification. ontlintittof n.' pi.637c aiEsa7.---fl r 001379904) OrP 311( Ip1 Pria,pmrne: .,...:.Re /J F(e.d+- Notary Public, Stale of Newei'iMycommissionexpires: 12 .30-20 9 O{4ai as (LEMAN' ESTATES) O *.en...Lia ...te %m (0011799040.m dv TENANT ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF OREGON ss: COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 1 certify that 1 know or have satisfactory evidence that Wayne Wooten is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Director of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC by AT&T Mobility Corporation, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: NrN_0_M02r_.. 12+2(31 rI . Notary Seal OFFICIAL STAMP ROCNELLS JOHNSON NUNtEN NOTARY PUBLIC•OREGON COMMISSIONNO. 090443 My COMMISSION E%PIPES APRIL 1,3017 Si Nae fot T{gbry) C.1\ OCk1lk- r;snl kUn-ttr' Legibly Print or Stamp Name of ) Notary Public 'n and for the State of r2 My appointment expires: Pp -11 I I t 001379904) I5 Amar(Laawm ESTAras)Opaa. mad USL'v.Me Apee . (000/9904) CM d.:< EXHIBIT 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND LICENSED AREA Page 1 of 5 to the Land License Agreement dated , 20. by and between Sanford's Service Center, Inc., a Hawaii corporation, as Landlord, and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as Tenant. The Property is legally described as follows: All of that certain parcel of land (being all of the land(s) described in and covered by Land Patent Grant Number 4399 to A. V. Callaghan, Land Patent Grant Number 4401 to George R. Carter, Portions of Land Patent. Grant Number 4371 to Markie Rycroft, Land Patent Grant Number 4370 to Alfred W. Carter, Land Patent Grant Number 4331 to Sami G. Wilder and Land Patent Grant Number 4330 to C. L. Wight) situate, lying and being at Kamaili, District of Puna, Island and County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, bearing Tax Key designation (3) 1-3-001-007, and containing an area of 441.345 acres, more or less. BEING THE PREMISES ACQUIRED BY DEED AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS GRANTOR PUNA SUGAR COMPANY, LTD., a Hawaii corporation GRANTEE SANFORD'S SERVICE CENTER, INC., a Hawaii corporation DATED June 13, 1995 RECORDED Document No. 95-081415 The Licensed Area are described andior depitted as follows: 00(37490-8) 001..d0PEAXI ESrATES)oa.WLad Lowe AAat'.a• 400MC104_o*bw 4 t 4- ry u AT& T a i 41 PROPOS® AT& T PROJECT AREA Reu 70DAArom WE PLAN: Ox LEFT A.R Q - ! MR IAIdOPDOI 1 T P r qa y / , 3r N A1.. V / mA 1 qe / sMVR f/; JJ yf_ v A- 1 SITE PLAN 7ac L lir-JS.: s4: e4aa6= t ' maEIS aaaavxa LIMN u_ F_....._..., 1. 14 amnavroa zIv j , v.".„," M'"".„'... ovaa VW vena rpt__._ s 5YStO11H 1='. i u--_ ul w t _ 17! ti NJMIyvlWG( SILLY ww - mw r .,•,' " s.. u.. nn., u a amu_ iJ 44, t/ m ,... ,...,.,.." 7ac MI WI C. MS MC1040, 04wlat WhISLI). 01iftetilt 04C0. 0004. MMM M* LVCn. Qtl0 W. Nt, CAP. t6RIG INItt. 0. 91 reC NLM CMYCQQ. 0 . 0M0 MCII104 IWayDMIK1St RaAS15 i1• D1aM VKYDMP 11a001IO) ION a11 I) Ma1N M KIL• 04. 1. COrtt atf100E6M0• e* 6 K / 1 M6tMY1 14ML R 1MIIIOGNUt 1 yrs... not Irl. Ia. MaIDtJOI, EQUIPMENT PLAN DIMENSION PLAN 4 2 MIR • Nall eAT& T NO 8Yeti) INNS INFRASTIZUCTINIE Y) M* Maw• NMQsl) waaal• uw• Mwl) anew. HIL03345 dawn Dc 6f@0 •... 1 • M) MI NNMy NMI NOUN A e3 AI tat10. lM pax iI mg 3 ANTENNA PLAN pi1 111. 03345 ULAN WWII 11. b) IaIDa aMIIMat Kt IMgt M4.1711 bAC{./ 414.001 YMNW AMOINA A KIIMMINF / UN Ya'w ,!ns A- 3 Page 5 of 5 I. THIS EXHIBIT MAY BE REPLACED BY A LAND SURVEY AND/OR CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OF THE LICENSED AREA ONCE RECEIVED BY TENANT. 2. ANY SETBACK OF THE LICENSED AREA FROM THE PROPERTY'S BOUNDARIES SHALL BE THE DISTANCE REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES. 3. WIDTH OF ACCESS ROAD SHALL BE THE WIDTH REQUIRED BY THE APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS. 4. THE TYPE, NUMBER AND MOUNTING POSITIONS AND LOCATIONS OF ANTENNAS AND TRANSMISSION LINES ARE ILLUSTRATIVE ONLY. ACTUAL TYPES. NUMBERS AND MOUNTING POSITIONS MAY VARY FROM WHAT IS SHOWN ABOVE. 001379904) 20 c ed (LPV..WI ESTATES) Vltim a11u11Amns OO1319904) EXHIBIT 10(b) SUBORDINATION, NON -DISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT FOLLOWS ON NEXT PAGE] Orme W IllaM11 MATES) OpS. W Lai IS N. (DN]A#Qmlm LAND COURT SYSTEM REGULAR SYSTEM AFTER RECORDATION, RETURN BY: MAIL( )PICKUP( New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC 1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE, 3rd Floor Atlanta, GA 30319 Amr: Network Real Estate Administration TYPE OF DOCUMEM: SUBORDINATION, NON -DISTURBANCE AND A I 1 URNMENT AGREEMENT (TOTAL PACES ) PARTIES To DOCUMENT: MORTGAGEE LANDLORD: TENANT: SANFORD'S SERVICE CENTER, INC., A HAWAII CORPORATION NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TAX MAP KEY: (3) I-3401:007 Re: Cell Site I HIL03345; Cell Site Name: LEILANI ESTATES (HI) Fixed Asset Number: 10553982 State: Hawaii County: Hawaii 001379904) q!r sM (LEILANI STATES)Otm W W Iitl i (031179•04)ps4pcx SUBORDINATION, NON -DISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT THIS SUBORDINATION, NON -DISTURBANCE AND ATTORNMENT AGREEMENT Agreement"), dated as of the date below, between [Insert Mortgagee's Name] having its principal office at [Insert Mortgagee's Address] , (hereinafter called "Mortgagee") and SANFORD'S SERVICE CENTER, INC., a Hawaii corporation whose mailing address is P.O. Box 1321, Palma, HI96778 (hereinafter called "Landlord"), and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address of 1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE, 3`d Floor, Atlanta, GA 30319 ("Tenant"). RECITALS: A. Tenant has entered into a certain Option and License Agreement dated [Insert Date], 20 , (the License") with Landlord, covering property more fully described in Exhibit 1 attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Licensed Area"); and B. Landlord has given to Mortgagee a mortgage (the "Mortgage") upon property having a street address of [Insert Address] , being identified as Lot in Block in the of [Insert City], Insert County] County, State of [Insert State] ("Property"), a part of which Property contains the Licensed Area; and C. The Mortgage on the Property is in the original principal sum of [Spell Out Dollar Amount]($ ) Dollars, which Mortgage has been recorded in the appropriate public office in and for [Insert County] County, [Insert State] ("Mortgage"); and D. Tenant desires to be assured of continued occupancy of the Licensed Area under the terms of the License and subject to the terms of this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, covenants and agreements herein contained, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows: I. So long as this Agreement will remain in MI force and effect, the License is and will be subject and subordinate to the lien and effect of the Mortgage insofar as it affects the real property and fixtures of which the Licensed Area forms a part (but not Tenant's trade fixtures and other personal property), and to all renewals, modifications, consolidations, replacements and extensions thereof, to the MI extent ofthe principal sum secured thereby and interest thereon, with the same force and effect as if the Mortgage had been executed, delivered, and duly recorded among the above-mentioned public records, prior to the execution and delivery of the License. 2. In the event Mortgagee takes possession ofthe Licensed Area as mortgagee -in -possession, including but not limited to, by deed in lieu offoreclosure or foreclosure of the Mortgage, Mortgagee agrees not to affect or disturb Tenant's right to pavans:ion of the Licensed Area and any of Tenant's other rights under the License in the exercise of Mortgagee's rights so long as Tenant is not then in default, after applicable notice and/or grace periods, under any of the terms, covenants, or conditions of the License. 3. In the event that Mortgagee succeeds to the interest of Landlord or other landlord under the License and/or to title to the Licensed Area, Mortgagee and Tenant hereby agree to be bound to one another under all ofthe terms, covenants and conditions of the License; accordingly, from and after such 001379904) I) sitdour 2 cbao.and 0 ren ESTATESOplas.r Lad bane dreersodaau+ws event, Mortgagee and Tenant will have the same remedies against one another for the breach of an agreement contained in the License as Tenant and Landlord had before Mortgagee succeeded to the interest of Landlord; provided, however, that Mortgagee will not be: a) personally liable for any riot Or omission of any prior landlord (including Landlord); or b) bound by any license Fee or additional license Fee which Tenant might have paid for more than the payment period as set forth under the License one month, year etc.) in advance to any prior landlord (including Landlord). 4. In the event that Mortgagee or anyone else acquires title to or the right to possession of the Licensed Area upon the foreclosure of the Mortgage, or upon the sale of the Licensed Area by Mortgagee or its successors or assigns after foreclosure or acquisition of tide in lieu thereof or otherwise, Tenant agrees not to seek to terminate the License by reason thereof, but will remain bound unto the new owner so long as the new owner is hours] to Tenant (subject to paragraph 3 above) undo all of the terms, covenants and conditions of the License. 5. Mortgagee understands, acknowledges and agrees that notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Mortgage and/or any related financing documents, including, without limitation, any UCC -I financing statements, Mortgagee will acquire no interest in any furniture, equipment, trade fixtures and/or other property installed by Tenant on the Property. Mortgagee hereby expressly waives any interest which Mortgagee may have or acquire with respect to such furniture, equipment, trade fixtures and/or other property of Tenant now, or hereafter, located on or affixed to the Property or any portion thereof and Mortgagee hereby agrees that same do not constitute realty regardless of the manner in which same are attached or affixed to the Property. 6. This Agreement will he binding upon and will extend to and benefit the successors and assigns of the parties hereto and to any assignees or subtenants of Tenant which are permitted under the License. The term "Mortgagee", when used in this Agreement will be deemed to include any person or entity which acquires title to or the right to possession ofthe Licensed Area by, through or under Mortgagee and/or the Mortgage, whether directly or indirectly. 7. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the state in which the Licensed Area are located, without regard to conflicts of law. ooistssoal stwit Remainder of Page Intentionally Blank — Signature Page Follows] OP... ml(EILAN1 ESTATES) Orden W Lath L,es a Arno.* (WI 310. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Agreement to be executed as of the last signature date below. 100137990-8} Linty LANDLORD: Sanford's Service Center, Inc., a Hawaii corporation ] ,, By: 4444— i4UCS a Print Name: VOUS i u ittIts: [Insert Titlel Vice) tla Date: [Insert Datel q%T%/q TENANT: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: AT&T Mobility Corporation Its: Manager By: Print Name: J Its: [Insert Title' Date: [Insert Date! MORTGAGEE: [Insert Mortgagee's Name] By: Print Name: f 1 Its: [Insert TitIel Date: [Insert Date]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE] 4 (Se. -(LP -CLAM ESTATES oaa d Lind Lva A.®m 00' STATE OF HAWAII COUNTY OF HAWAII ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS LANDLORD SS: On this vM day of !'r 7019in the Third Circuit, State of Hawai'i, befora me personally appeared L. S fl4*O r",..../.4 toa nonally known who, being by me duly sworn or affirmed, did say Nat such person is the Vrae - Pref 4ea.ge of SANFORD'S SERVICE CENTER, INC., a Hawaii corporation, that said person executed the foregoing instrument identified or described as Subordination, Non -Disturbance And Adornment Agreement on behalf ofthe corporation by authority of its board of directors and such person acknowledged the instrument to be the free act and deed/ of said corporation. unTheforegoinginstrument is dated Lt " u` and contained /Y' pages at the time of this acknowledgment/certification. 0013799041 O Off{ il//4TAl1t"e` e:Luxintt - 0. A4ezr r Notary Public, State of Hawai'i My commission expires: Z' 9°' 20t9 OIs ntuw.aSTA EnUna. w Lid tixns.Vsmm1W1))N4n edew STATE OF OREGON ss: COUNTY OF WASHINGTON 1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Wayne Wooten is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument, on oath stated that he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the Director ofNew Cingular Wireless KS, LLC by AT&T Mobility Corporation, to be the free and voluntary act ofsuch party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: Notary Seal 001379904) 2erxdm Signature of Notary) Legibly Print or Stamp Name ofNotary) Notary Public in and for the State of My appointment expires: 2 Whoa w nEtA.xr ESTATES/00» MI Lad Low. Armin trouAsn EXHIBIT 1 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND LICENSED AREA Page I of 4 rty is legally described as follows: All of that certain parcel of land (being all of the land(s) described in and covered by Land Patent Grant Number 4399 to A. V. Callaghan, Land Patent Grant Number 4401 to George R. Carter, Portions of Land Patent Grant Number 4371 to Markle Rycroft, Land Patent Grant Number 4370 to Alfred W. Carter, Land Patent Grant Number 4331 to Semi G. Wilder and Land Patent Grant Number 4330 to C. L. Wight) situate, lying and being at Kamaili, District of Puna, Island and County of Hawaii, State of Hawaii, bearing Tax Key designation (3) 1-3- 001-007, and containing an area of 441.366 acres, more or less. BEING THE PREMISES ACQUIRED BY DEED AND RESERVATION OF RIGHTS GRANTOR PUNA SUGAR COMPANY, LTD., a Hawaii corporation GRANTEE SANFORD'S SERVICE CENTER, INC., a Hawaii corporation DATED June 13, 1995 RECORDED . Document No. 95-081415 The Licensed Area is legally described as follows: 001379904} gaaa.e (MIAMI ESTATES,Optica I.aa Lica* baa (00111%941 do= I rgae ., i7 \ ' t, t tiN ryyu be. a... HBOVLS fof PROPOSED Aido t PRRJECEARFA f. p OMLRP no A Jucl] poaoi" aw e/ A 0 N 4/ 4 ^ ..-- HUEYRL; A. SIZE PUN ... .., ... O rai r.- W41 w a......,..• H1103 45 1 f 1_ m. I 1,\/ II! H ne j I it II 1iI n,.. vo,,,.. H1W3345 mow a t, m - PA 110A u. uPnNA ROAD tN.. tanaRN. n A• Z COMPOUtO PLAN ...... : t l: IR ENLARGED SITE PIAN w A A MAU ru.. wc. aMw... aww. 4w4P.. a1. In. aGcma,. a wwww. Coucni KIM110 . aa, 6. ( MNK. q .] U u• GI a1Q. M1 •• 1K MAWca. owawma., asro. 1.1.11:01.0 a 1n Mit RaCiI0. x1) w. GG11110101. 1 00150. 14. 04. 1t010 GO.. ala au. 111I. wCL1G. IN l, w4IM 1. 04t0 GOA AT& T Ww. w, M l May. M0N. 41Aq. f.1.,/ waa. uu. w. awa. wl3 w,wut,s. HIL03345 auw.. s. AC aweol.: w« EQUIPMENT PLAN DIMENSION PLAN po2 Iff! fx- 41111 3 ANTENNA PLAN a..... AMBIul a eowMertww aro A- 3 i EXHIBIT 11 ENVIRONMENTAL DISCLOSURE Landlord represents and warrants that the Property, as of the Effective Date, is free of hazardous substances except as follows: Sanford's Service Center, Inc. is not aware of any Immo hazardous subsumes, including asbestos -containing materials and ked pmt contained on the subject property nor has the subject property been subject to eny contamination or hewdous conditions resulting in environmental investigations, inquiry or remediation. I0001990-11 Op'e W aRIN9 aMMAUS) OWI• mad IAM L4®, MKme+ (WU)riAe_e.deo 00137990-S EXHIBIT 12 STANDARD ACCESS LETTER FOLLOWS ON NEXT PAGE) 400W 9PRA% FSTAIMOODO wland Ll+ns Mvi^en (000/9904) a< 6.v Sanford's Service Center, Inc.* 15-2628 Keeau-Pahoa Rd, Pahoa,HI 96778 Phone (801) 965-8144 FAX (108) 965-6621 Contr. Lie. H C-17670 PUC #5124-C sansrine.klm l@howaHsnteLaet September 30, 2019 Building Staff / Security Staff Sanford's Service Center, he, 15-2628 Kesau-Pahoa Rd. Paha, HI 96778 Re: Authorized Access granted to AT&T Mobility Dear Building and Security Staff, Please be advised that we have signed a license with AT&T Mobility AT&T Mobility to install, operate and maintain telecommunications equipment at the property.eterms of the license grant AT&T Mobility and its representatives, employees, agents and subcontractors ('tepucac atives") 24 hour per day, 7 day per week access to the licensed area To avoid impact on telephone service during the day, AT&T Mobility representatives may be seeking access to the property outside of normal business hours. AT&T Mobility representatives have been instructed to keep noise levels at a minimum during their visit Please grant the bearer of n copy of this letter access to the piors ty and to licensed area Thank you for your assistance. 00131S196a1 Qna W (B1M1 ESTATES) 0000 - Loll limo AmM.st (OIITAV+ q eats C i EXHIBIT 24(b) MEMORANDUM OF LICENSE FOLLOWS ON NEXT PAGE) 10013799041oom$ W OSTEN. vsr*ms)osso•owl UM timey.mw(0oome) warn LAND COURT SYSTEM REGULAR SYSTEM AFTER RECORDATION, RETURN By: MAIL ( )PICKUP ( ) New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC 1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE, 3'° Floor Atlanta, GA 30319 Attn: Network Real Estate Administration TYPE OF DOCUMENT: MEMORANDUM OF LICENSE (TOTAL PAGES: PARTIES TO DOCUMENT: LANDLORD: SANFORD'S SERVICE CENTER, INC., A HAWAIICORPORA11ON TENANT: NEW LINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC, ADELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY TAX MAP KEY: (3)1-3-001:007 Re: Cell Site # HIL03345; Cell Site Name: LEILANI ESTATES (HI) Fixed Asset Number. 10553982 State: Hawaii County: Hawaii 001379904( Oym,W (LILMl ESTATE) Option W1 Lm. Amman (mt)mon as. don USE -2D.-OOOOI4 Mori, Ashley From: Jackson, Maija Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 12:55 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: FW: HIL03345 Leilani Estates - CUP application 20-000084 Please intake email for USE 20-000084. From: Andrew Tomlinson <atomlinson@151P.Com> Sent: Monday, December 28, 2020 11:45 AM To: Jackson, Maija<Maija.Jackson@hawaiicounty.gov> Cc: Bryce Novak <bnovak@151P.Com>; Darrow, Jeff <Jeff.Darrow@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: RE: HIL03345 Leilani Estates - CUP application 20-000084 Ms. Jackson, GON P? ANNI DEC 20 2020 Fr. a If the planning department supports it, pursuant to the request of the neighbor, AT&T is proposing to develop a stealth monopine facility. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Regards, Andrew Andrew Tomlinson Site Acquisition and Zoning Specialist J5 Infrastructure Partners la Office: (808) 451-2840 Ext # 184 8 Cell: (808) 864-8567 677 Ala Moana Blvd. Suite 917 Honolulu, HI 96813 E atOmlinson(n115lo.COm 5 INFRASTRUCTURE From: Jackson, Maija<Maija.Jackson@hawaiicounty.gov> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 9:05 AM To: Andrew Tomlinson <atomlinson@J51P.Com> Cc: Bryce Novak <bnovak@JSIP.Com>• Darrow, Jeff <Jeff.Darrow@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject: RE: HIL03345 Leilani Estates - CUP application 20-000084 Thanks Andrew. I will intake these emails for the Commission. Is AT&T going to develop a stealth tower given the neighbors request or are you waiting to see if PC will require it? From: Andrew Tomlinson catomlinson@J51P.Com> Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 4:37 PM To: Jackson, Maija<Maiia.Jackson@hawaiicounty.gov> Cc: Bryce Novak <bnovak@J51P.Com>; Darrow, Jeff <Jeff.Darrow@hawaiicounty.gov> Subject:1-11L03345 Leilani Estates - CUP application 20-000084 Ms. Jackson, 1 Planning Dept. Exhibit 2. SCANNED ng, 282'J?D I 38827 Please find attached email correspondence AT&T received regarding the proposed CUP application 20-000084. Emails were received from Jacklynn Ruggirello and Elijah Donat (husband and wife) who live adjacent to the project parcel. They had concerns regarding the visual impact of the project on their property and business. After some research and discussion they appear satisfied that the tower would most probably not have a visual impact on their home. They did request that AT&T develop a stealth tower to minimize visual impact to the lower part of their property. If you have any questions please let me know. Thank you very much, Andrew Andrew Tomlinson Site Acquisition and Zoning Specialist J5 Infrastructure Partners 2 Office: (808) 451-2840 Ext # 184 3 Cell: (808) 864-8567 677 Ala Moana Blvd. Suite 917 Honolulu, HI 96813 Z atomlinson2l5ip.com 15 INFRASTRUCTURE 2 Mitchell D. Roth tour Lee E. Lord Vamping Director December 16, 2020 County Of jIt1Wiai`i HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupanl Street Adie 2501 • nim. j In wail 9620 18081932.29011. Ea.1808) 912-1928 TO: ZENDO KERN, PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: ROBERT R. K. PERREIRA, ACTING FIRE CHEF Robert R.K. Perreira acting Fire Chief SUBJECT: Use Permit Application (USE 20-000084) Applicant: AT&T Mobility Request: To Establish a 100 -Foot Tall Monopole Telecommunication Tower with Related Equipment Tax Map Key: 1-3-001:007 In regards to the above-mentioned request, the following shall be in accordance: The 148 gallon fuel tank shall require a Fire Department permit. For any questions regarding this requirement or to apply for this permit please contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at (808) 932-2911. Robert R. K. Perreira Acting Fire Chief HmuuiCount y,. nr, Equal tlpryrtimay Pr', uicrn ibnpleyr 138537 Planning Dept. Exhibit 3 Ms. Kimberly Narel EBI Consulting 21 B Street Burlington, MA 01803 Dear Ms. Narel: STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND W IIDIIFE 1151 PUN(imOWL STREET, ROOM 325 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813 November 18, 2020 Log no. 2702 The Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) has received your inquiry regarding review of the Natural Resources Review for the proposed wireless communications facility in Pahoa on the island of Hawai`i, Hawaii, TMK: (3) 1-3-001:007. The proposed project consists of constructing a 100 -foot telecommunications monopole and an accompanying utility equipment shelter within a fenced compound on preciously undeveloped land. We appreciate the inclusion of conservation measures mentioned in the Natural Resources Review intended to avoid construction and operational impacts to State listed species such as the Hawaiian hawk (`to), Hawaiian hoary bat (`opeape`a), Hawaiian goose (nene) and ('yiandro nanawaleen.sis (Ha`iwale). DOFAW provides the following additional comments on the potential of the proposed work to affect listed species in the vicinity of the project area. The State listed Hawaiian Goose or Nene (Branca sandvicensis) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the proposed project site. It is against State law to harm or harass these species. If any of these species are present during construction activities, then all activities within 100 feet (30 meters) should cease. and the bird should not be approached. Work may continue after the bird leaves the area of its own accord. If a nest is discovered at any point, please contact the Hawai`i Island DOFAW office at (808) 974-4221. We note that artificial lighting can adversely impact seabirds that may pass through the area at night by causing disorientation. This disorientation can result in collision with manmade artifacts or grounding of birds. For nighttime lighting that might be required. DOFAW recommends that all lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. This is the period when young seabirds take their maiden voyage to the open sea. For illustrations and guidance related to seabird -friendly light styles that also protect the dark, starry skies of Hawaii please visit: https://dInr.hawaii.gov/wildlife/files/2016/03/DOC439.pdf. The State listed Hawaiian Hoary Bat or `Ope`ape`a (Lasiurus cinereas semo2.$) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. If any site clearing is Planning Dept. Exhibit 9 required this should be timed to avoid disturbance during the bat birthing and pup rearing season June l through September 15). Barbed wire should also be avoided for any construction because bat mortalities have been documented as a result of becoming ensnared by barbed wire during flight. To prevent the spread of Rapid 'Ohi`a Death (ROD), if 'bhi`a trees are present and will be removed, trimmed, or potentially injured DOFAW requests that the information and guidance at the following website be reviewed and followed: https://cros.ctahr.hawaii.edu/rod. DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites, such as in fill. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens (e.g. Rapid `Ohi`a Death), vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants), or invasive plant parts that could harm our native species and ecosystems. We recommend consulting the Big Island Invasive Species Committee at (808) 933-3340 in planning, design, and construction of the project to learn of any high-risk invasive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive species. Gear that may contain soil, such as work boots and vehicles, should be thoroughly cleaned with water and sprayed with 70% alcohol solution to prevent the spread of Rapid `Ohi`a Death and other harmful fungal pathogens. DOFAW recommends surveying for rare and endangered plants that may occur in the area. If any of these species are found, please notify DOFAW at (808) 587-0166. We appreciate your efforts to work with our office for the conservation of our native species. Should the scope of the project change significantly, or should it become apparent that threatened or endangered species may be impacted, please contact our staff as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact Koa Matsuoka, Protected Species Habitat Conservation Planning Associate at (808) 587-4149 or koa.matsuoka researcher@hawaii.gov. Sincerely, DAVID G. SMITH Administrator Mori, Ashley From: Andrew Tomlinson <atomlinson@JSIP.Com> Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 12:48 PM To: AT&T LEILANIE ESTATES; Jacklynn Ruggirello Cc: Elijah Donat Subject: RE: proposed cell tower 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana rd Attachments: HIL03345 Leilani Estates Location.pdf Aloha Jacklynn, Thank you for calling me back today and explaining to me your concerns regarding your property and the possible impact to the ocean view from the proposed AT&T facility. Also, thank you for texting the image of the view from your place. Please let me review the information you provided and get back to you. In the meantime, here is a Google Earth image off the proposed location. Please fed free to reach out if you have any more information to share. Best regards, Andrew Andrew Tomlinson Site Acquisition and Zoning Specialist J5 Infrastructure Partners Office: (808) 451-2840 Ext P 184 E Cell: (808) 864-8567 677 Ala Moana Blvd. Suite 917 Honolulu, HI 96813 HHatomlinson@j5ip.com Original Message From: AT&T LEILANIE ESTATES Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2020 8:57 AM To: Jacklynn Ruggirello <jacklynn@chilkatenvironmenta l.com> Subject: RE: proposed cell tower 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana rd Aloha Jacklynn, I would like to discuss your concerns regarding the possible visual impact of the proposed facility. I left you a voice message yesterday and am hoping you would please return my call. Thanks very much, Andrew Andrew Tomlinson Site Acquisition and Zoning Specialist 15 Infrastructure Partners Planning Dept. Exhibit SCANNED 1 Office: (808) 451-2840 Ext # 184 E Cell: (808) 864-8567 677 Ala Moana Blvd. Suite 917 Honolulu, HI 96813 HHatom linson@j5ip.com Original Message From: Jacklynn Ruggirello <jacklynn@chilkatenvironmental.com> Sent: Friday, December 4, 20203:17 PM To: AT&T LEILANIE ESTATES <attleilaniestates@151P.Com> Subject: proposed cell tower 13-3820 Pahoa Kalapana rd Aloha, I am owner of the property adjacent to the proposed tower site. In the information letter, The exact location of the proposed site is unclear from the provided map. Even though I am in favor of a cell tower locally I am concerned that It will be seen in the main view from our property. We are the only property on east side of Ala ili that has an ocean view so if the tower was placed further south it wouldn't impact anyone else. How can we negotiate for a placement that doesn't impact our view? Thank you, Jacklynn Ruggirello, Owner 907)314-0877 2 saibc ou: j:: a1 Jexg Mori, Ashley From: Elijah Donat<elijah@chilkatenvironmental.com> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 7:44 AM To: AT&T LEILANIE ESTATES Subject: Re: Cell tower location Andrew, Aloha! Jacklynn and I appreciate your prompt responses and additional detail on site location. Your response addressed most of our concerns. Our only remaining concern is that we could see it and that this would be detrimental to our ocean view and trigger our guests that are uneducated about 5G risks. Our houses are 100 ft elevation above the tower location you provided and therefore, whatever visual impact there might be, we expect to be very minimal, if not a non -issue. It's hard to imagine we could see it over the trees from the houses, but likely we might see it from the lower property around our hot tubs and trails for guests. We would greatly appreciate any efforts to disguise the tower as a tree to maintain the rural aesthetic. Please let us know if you need any more information from us and thank you for your part in improving communication and internet. These are much needed for community safety and to provide our guests with the services they expect. Mahalo, Elijah Donat (907) 303 7899 On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 8:59 AM AT&T LEILANIE ESTATES <atticilaniestates(a j 5ip.com> wrote: Aloha Elijah, I gave you a call yesterday hoping to discuss your concerns regarding the possible visual impact ofthe proposed facility. Please give me a call at your earliest convenience to discuss the proposed facility. Thank very much, Andrew Thanks very much, Andrew Tomlinson Site Acquisition and Zoning Specialist SCANNED Planning Dept- Iri. 1 OExhibit (e p,,!;'87pi J5 infrastructure Partners office: .. 1 Ext t1184 Cell: 151NFRASTRUCTURE From: Elijah Donat <elilah(a-chil katenvironmenlal.com> Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2020 9:35 AM To: AT&T LEILANIE ESTATES <attleilaniestates@JSIP.Com> Subject: Cell tower location Andrew Omlinson, Site Acquisition and Zoning Specialist, We are happy that a new tower is planned and hopeful about much needed better service. I own 13-3773 Ala ili. it's the pie -shaped 20 acre property immediately up-slope your arrow. Unlike other properties on our street, we have a full ocean view and power brought up from Hwy 130 (at our own private expense). We have hotsprings, a pool and steamvents on the property and use it to host guests in our BNB with four small houses and one large house, all fully permitted. I am a retired engineer from Alaska and as a scientist am not concerned about 50 towers. We are concerned however that your facility could open access from hwy 130 to our property or be placed within our unobstructed oceanview. No other property on the street has an ocean view, so nobody else would notice. A tower in the location of the arrow(assuming not likely location/just reference to TMK) would diminish the quality of our property for guests and resale. Additionally, any connection from 130 to our neighborhood would make us less safe. Our street has had a problem with thieves and we are all coordinating to keep our gates in place as the only entry point to the properties.We have spent over 10K on CCTV system to monitor our driveway to Ala ili and any access opened up to 130 would be very bad for the neighborhood. My friend from Alaska just bought the 28 acre parcel on the Pahoa side of your TMK. He'll return from a trip next week and will echo this response. Please let us know if you plan is to put a tower in front of 13-3773. If this is the plan we will most certainly object and coordinate with our neighbors to contest. Many of our neighbors work at Puna Rainforest Retreat and share the observation that it would be unreasonable to put a tower in front ofour ocean view hotsprings and vacation rentals. Please respond with clarification of tower location. The arrow into a large parcel is not a clear figure to define the proposed location. We need to understand where the X goes. We look forward to your prompt reply. I've referred the information to our legal council as I've not been on this side of the discussion in Hawaii and am not familiar with our rights of contest. We would not object if the tower is placed outside our view. Our entire property is positioned to the ocean view for 5 2 permitted buildings, pools, hot tubs, trail, etc whereas no other property on street has an ocean view so their homes are not oriented to the view and would likely not be visible. we look forward to your reply Elijah Donat, MS. PMP Chilkat Environmental, Engineer Puna Rainforest Retreat 907303-7899 eliiahR chi lkatenvironincubi I.etn