Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-01-07 Windward Exh B COH Parks and Recreationn SMA 20-000077 WINDWARD PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY OF HAWAII HEARING TRANSCRIPT JANUARY 7, 2021 A regularly advertised hearing on the application of COUNTY OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION (SMA 20-000077) was called to order at 9::40 a.m. via live stream meeting with Chairman John Replogle presiding. VIRTUAL ATTENDANCE(COMMISSIONERS): Gilbert Aguinaldo, Dean Au, Joseph Clarkson, Thomas Raffipiy, John Replogle. VIRTUAL ATTENDANCE(STAFF): Malia Hall (Deputy Corporation Counsel for the Windward Planning Commission), Jeff Darrow (Deputy Planning Director), John Mukai (Deputy Corporation Counsel for the Planning Department); Maija Jackson (Temporary Assignment Planning Program Manager), Alex Roy (Planner), Rachelle Ley (Department Secretary), and Melissa Dacayanan-Salvador (Windward Planning Commission Secretary). APPLICANT: COUNTY OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION (SMA 20-000077) Application for a Special Management Use Permit to conduct facilities upgrades and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) improvements at Kolekole Gulch Park on 5.5 acres of land situated within the Special Management Area. The subject property is located at the Kolekole Gulch Park, makai of Old Mamalahoa Highway and underneath and mauka of Hawaii Belt Road, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMK: (3) 2-8-015:015. Secretary's Note: "—"means that there were technical and/or internet difficulties which made the conversation inaudible. REPLOGLE: So, we are moving on to the presentation of agenda Item Number 1. The Applicant is the County of Hawaii Department of Parks and Recreation, SMA 20-000077. Application for a Special Management Use Permit to conduct facilities upgrades and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA) improvements at Kolekole Gulch Park on 5.5 acres of land situated within the Special Management Area. The subject property is located in the Kolekole Gulch Park, makai of Old Mamalahoa Highway and underneath and mauka of the Hawaii Belt Road, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMK: (3) 2-8-015:015. Staff, I believe Alex the Planner will doing the presentation. ROY: Okay, can everybody hear me all right? Okay. REPLOGLE: Yes. ROY: Okay, thank you Chair and Commissioners for attending today. I'm going to talk about the County of Hawaii, Department of Parks and Recreation Special Management Area Use Permit(SMA) Application for the Kolekole Gulch Park Accessibility Improvement Project. EXHIBIT B 1 Here's a location map. Most of us know where this is but is just north of Honomu and makai of Akaka Falls State Park. As you can see it's kind of between Hakalau and Pepe`ekeo. The inset map kind of shows that the park right along Kolekole Stream. The Applicant in this case the County Parks and Recreation is requesting a number of things at the park. I'll go through them. Converting the existing restrooms into single occupant accessible restrooms and upgrading the existing associated septic system. Providing a new accessible comfort station with septic systems. Building one (1) new pavilion, demolishing one (1)pavilion, and repairing the remaining pavilions. Providing drainage improvements to divert shower runoff from the stream. Replacing the shower and picnic tables with accessible facilities. Removing non-native vegetation. Repaving and improving the stability and integrity of the driveway and parking area. Developing an on-site potable water system and fire protection water system. Some landscaping improvements and other work including remediation of lead contaminated soils and some asbestos or lead removal from the existing structures. Now,just to give the Commission a little bit of background the lead remediation project is ongoing and required soil removal and that is been coordinated through Department of Transportation (DOT) and Department of Health and Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR). I think if there is more specific questions about the lead remediation project and those details the Applicant is here and could address that. But today this SMA is really for the site improvements it does include soil remediation from the park itself and then the asbestos and lead removal from the existing structures that's typical for old structures. So, the idea and the intent of this project is to one clean up this area make it safe for the public two improve access to the site, to the park as this is a very heavily used park. It's been in existence since 1938 so, it's been around for a while and the community relies on this and at the same time the Hakalau Park is also closed in this area. So, getting this up and running getting it accessible for the public for those with disabilities and at the same time making it safe is really the goal of this project. Here is the County zoning you see that it's about a little bit of A-20a, Agricultural 20-acre and then there is a section of Open. So, the surrounding areas you see are all A-20a or A-l0a with some small residential development up north of the site. The State Land Use this entire site is within the State Land Use Conservation District. So, the Applicant has been working with Office of Conservation and Coastal Lands (OCCL) and DLNR to accommodate these uses on Conservation District zoned lands. The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) has this entire area pretty much the riparian buffer in the Conservation District south and kind of around that is some important agricultural lands open along the coast and then low-density urban north of the site. Here's an aerial photograph of the park you could see Old Mamalahoa Highway that comes off of the Belt Road is the access and there's a driveway that heads in right into the park itself. So, they will be doing some improvements again safety improvements improving access and some of the roadway improvements. Here's coming into the park so down that driveway and this is what you see as you enter the park. You can see some of the pavilions, the restrooms, the bridge and the bridge is where most of the problems from lead contamination came from. It was found that the paint and materials used to construct the bridge sloughed off into the ground below, in the EXHIBIT B 2 water below thus impacting this area with lead contamination. So, they've been working steadily to clean that up, but this is a big problem for bridges across Hawaii that were built during this time period. Here's moving into the site more you can see the larger pavilion, some of the other pavilions that are off to the in the center of the photo kind of off to the right-hand side of the park. Here's the parking area, three (3) of the pavilions and then here is a shot of the site kind of your makai of the parking area and this is where the new pavilion and ADA restrooms will be going right where the picture is taken here. So, here's a site plan general site plan for the park improvements. I just included this one to kind of show you the existing pavilions in yellow. So, you can see them kind of across the top there and then the new comfort station and new pavilion location which you kind of see in red, outlined in red. So, this gives you an idea of where those new comfort stations are going to go. Now, the septic, the drainage or in this case the drain field for the new comfort station will be makai of that new comfort station and you know typically takes up an area about 10,000 square feet. Here's a view north along Hawaii Belt Road at the entrance to the Kolekole Gulch Park I think we've all seen that and then here of course is the view south along the Hawaii Belt Road and you can the entrance on the right. Then kind of here is a current entrance, you can see the park is closed, the gate is up and has been closed I believe since 2016 maybe 2017 and will remain closed until the lead remediation and project is able to be completed. I have noted that people do still access this area, walking down because it's still a surf spot so access is still available it's just really there is no parking right now. But people are still going down there and so, the Applicant maybe able to talk a little bit more about access during construction and how that may work. So, at this time the Planning Director's recommendation for SMA-20-000077 is approval with the stated conditions. REPLOGLE: Thank you Alex. Are there any questions from the Commissioners? CLARKSON: I have a question. REPLOGLE: Yes. CLARKSON: I'm just curious about the lead remediation project. I remember it but did we approve an SMA in recent history for that project? ROY: No, this is, this would be the SMA for lead remediation on the park parcel. I know some work has been conducted in the DOT right-of-way which extends down below the bridge and they've starting working there testing but this is the SMA for lead remediation in the park on that park parcel the subject parcel. CLARKSON: So, no actual lead remediation in the right-of-way has actually occurred to date? EXHIBIT B 3 ROY: I believe the Applicant probably can speak to that, but I believe it is ongoing right now. I know a number of the testing of course took some time locating the concentrations within the soil and so in that sense the project is ongoing but the Applicant maybe able to speak exactly to as to what is happening right now currently with lead remediation, soil remediation. CLARKSON: Well, my question really is probably for the DOT but, if we didn't approve an SMA and I can't remember us doing it for that project why are they, how are they able to have a project like that in the SMA area without a permit? ROY: Well, I'm not sure if that's, yeah, I'm not sure. I mean the DOT right-of-way you are dealing with two (2) different things you have the Conservation District which the State has authority regulatory authority over uses. In this case, the SMA is dealing with the impacts and in the SMA but you don't approve uses. Also, in the DOT right-of-way I believe that they have the authority to conduct activities that are necessary to protect and to preserve the right-of-way but again they can probably speak to exactly what's going on right now outside of the project parcel. I'm not sure. CLARKSON: Okay. ROY: I'm not sure within the project parcel, you are approving soil remediation within the project parcel. CLARKSON: Which I saw on the map does not extend to the right-of-way perhaps, State the highway projects are exempt from SMA permits I'm not familiar with "—" ROY: Yeah, I'm not sure "—" From my past experience with DLNR, yeah DOT kind of has authority within the right-of-way to deal with what's necessary within the right-of-way to keep that functional. But again, yes you are approving soil remediation in this project parcel which is the park parcel. So, that's part of this approval. CLARKSON: Thank you. ROY: I can't speak to the other, other parcels. REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. Are there any other questions? I have one, it was in your list of things that they were going to do, and it was referring to the Kolekole Stream regarding shower runoff. What is meant by that? Rain showers or human showers or — ROY: Human showers. Yeah, right now the runoff from the showers goes directly into the stream or — REPLOGLE: Okay. ROY: So, they need to re-grade and they are going to remove that input— REPLOGLE: Okay. EXHIBIT B 4 ROY: — into the stream so, the idea is not only to provide access but to really to clean up the site, deal with better septic,potable water, fire security, runoff, you know preventing runoff, storm water management, the shower you know alleviating those impacts to the stream from current activities. So, yeah it goes into the stream and so the idea is stop that completely. REPLOGLE: The idea then is to clean up the environment for all concerns the fish, us, everything. ROY: Yeah, not just the humans but you know the stream itself provides a number of resources for gathering and so yeah, the idea is to really to tackle this area holistically. REPLOGLE: Yes. ROY: The lead remediation, asbestos removal, access, and then even making the pavilions themselves safer and better for the public. REPLOGLE: Okay. Thank you very much. So, any other further questions? CLARKSON: Yes,just following up on your question about the showers Mr. Chair. These are open air beach shower type things, these are not showers like pool house or anything. ROY: Nodded head as yes. CLARKSON: Okay. These are just rinse off stations. Alright, thank you. REPLOGLE: Okay. So, next we will have the Applicant's presentation. Ron Terry, of Geometrician Associates (Agent for the County of Hawaii, Department of Parks and Recreation), Kevin Sakai (Parks Project Manager, County of Hawaii, Department of Parks and Recreation)., Yen Wen Fang, Engineering Partners and Brian Funai will be in attendance with Ron Terry. Please raise your right hand. Do you affirm to tell the truth on this matter now before the Windward Planning Commission? TERRY: I do. REPLOGLE: Please state your name and the area of your residence. Did you receive the Planning Department's background report and recommendation? TERRY: I want to first make sure Chairman that you can hear me? REPLOGLE: Yes, I can. TERRY: Great— REPLOGLE: I can see you too. EXHIBIT B 5 TERRY: Okay, I'm sorry for that. My name is Ron Terry and I live in Hilo, Hawaii. REPLOGLE: Thank you. TERRY: I did receive the background report, we have, probably the lead for most of the questions here will be our Parks and Recreation Department. I'm here to answer anything about environmental issues and then we have our Engineers. I would also like to maybe not right now but when you are ready, I can discuss the question of the Commissioner regarding the SMA for the DOT project. REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. Can you tell us whether or not you agree or disagree with the recommendation and you may give us your presentation? TERRY: Well, thank you on this matter I will defer to the Parks and Recreation Department. REPLOGLE: Okay. Thank you. You may begin or the Parks and Recreation may begin. I don't know where they are, but. TERRY: There. REPLOGLE: There they are. Good morning. KOMATA: Good morning, this is James Komata, Planner for Parks and Recreation and Kevin Sakai, Project Manager for Parks and Recreation. REPLOGLE: Okay. KOMATA: To your question on the conditions. We had the concern on Condition number eleven (11). Just wanted to clarify what the intent is on that because it references a State document which is a guide from, I believe 2006 and so, we have a very thorough and detailed set of plans that are presented, that were presented to the Department. We want to clarify what specific requirements either we are not addressing or it's unclear that we are addressing that generated that condition. REPLOGLE: Staff? Does someone care to answer that? JACKSON: Hi, this is Maija Jackson I can try to answer that and Alex you can jump in if you would like. So, this is a somewhat standard condition that we use for SMA permits and basically, the guide gives Best Management Practices to use for storm water management practices. It is meant as a guide, I see that the wording that we have in the condition is a"shall" and perhaps that should say "should". So, we could make that change but, basically the intent of the condition was to ask that Parks and Recreation refer to that guide and implement as many of the storm water management practices as is feasible. EXHIBIT B 6 KOMATA: Yeah, I would appreciate the "shall"being changed to a"should". We did review it with our design team and with Ron as well and it appears that our designers have taken into account a lot of these Best Management Practices already. So, because we have, or you guys had the benefit of a fully developed set of plans I was wondering if there was anything specifically on top of that that you guys want to see. Especially under the "shall" condition, but if it's a "should" I think we are comfortable with that. ROY: Yeah, I have no problem with the "should", like Maija said it's a general condition just to remind those working in that area to take a look at that if there is something that can be used it would be great to use that. But otherwise, I have no problem with changing the Applicant "should" implement . KOMATA: Okay, thank you. REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. KOMATA: That's the only concern that we have as far as the conditions go from Parks and Recreation side. REPLOGLE: Okay. Any discussion? AU: Mr. Chair, I have a question. REPLOGLE: Yes, Mr. Au. AU: Thank you Mr. Terry, Mr. Komata and Mr. Sakai for being here. This is a project that the community has been waiting for, from my understanding the park's been closed for five (5)years is that correct? KOMATA: The park is actually open right now. I think what Alex had mentioned about having to walk down, I think we had reopened a few months ago. People are able to drive down to the park and get there. Once we were able to work with DOT to cordon off or secure the areas with the higher lead content in the soil and be able to re-establish a safe maintenance practice down there. So, the park is open, and people are able to get down there and park in the park. AU: Okay, well I guess what I was alluding to was it has been closed for a long time and this is a project that the community needs so that they can enjoy the facilities and enjoy the park down there. I guess my question is more for maybe Mr. Funai, Mr. Yen and Mr. Terry and maybe Mr. Komata and Mr. Sakai if you guys can elaborate on that. There was an issue about the lead, and you know I understand this project is moving forward because you guys already, because the County is already designing it. It looks pretty complete to me and I understand the lead project is going to be concurrent if this project gets approved by this Commission. If the Special Use Permit gets approved, then everything is going to go concurrently, and I just want to know where the lead project is at and if it is going to be anticipated to be done at the same time when the improvements are going to be done. EXHIBIT B 7 KOMATA: Sorry, this is James Komata from Parks and Recreation. So, we just had a conference call this morning with DOT to bring all the parties up to speed as to where both projects if you want to consider them separate entities undertaking the projects. DOT's project to remediate the soil to remove the lead contaminated soil and dispose of it properly and re- import new soils to re-establish the existing park to its current condition. That would happen prior to the construction project that involves the accessibility and the structural improvements, the water system upgrades. So, it would be something that we would be dovetailing where the DOT project would run and then the County project would run immediately after that so, we try to minimize the amount of downtime or inaccessibility of the park to the public and the users. But it's the access is too tight; the area is too small we can't have two (2) separate contractors so to speak working there at the same time right on top of each other. CLARKSON: I have a question. AU: Thank you James for that answer and I understand that our Commission, our duty here is just to look at the Special permit like Alex had just mentioned. But I think it's fair for us to be concerned about the lead issues because the community will be using it and I do know the County's intentions and everybody's intentions is to make everything safe. So, I appreciate that answer and thank you very much. REPLOGLE: Joe, you had a question? CLARKSON: Yes, I just have a question as to whether the DOT lead remediation and the County of Hawaii lead remediation will be simultaneous or will you wait for the DOT to finish their project then do the lead remediation on the County project and then begin construction of the improvements. What's a snapshot of the schedule? KOMATA: So, like I mentioned the conference call that we had with DOT and some other parties this morning. We are waiting on procedures that the DOT has to follow in order to implement their project. We're looking our project if I had to guess at this point, I would say that we are about six (6) to seven (7) months out from being able to start construction once we go through our procurement bid process and acquire all the permits necessary because there are additional permits and approvals, we need to get following what happens here. So, if the County's project starts in 6 to 7 months what we would like to do is to work with DOT to squeeze their project in ahead of ours. I'm not sure again we're waiting on time frames from them because there still are certain procedures, they have to follow in order to start their project. So, nothing is set right now that's just throwing it up in the air. If you want something in 6 to 7 months for us to start construction on the County's project and that's not looking at schedules, it's not looking at facility availability, usability all those have to come into play once we actually set a start date. REPLOGLE: Yes, Joe? EXHIBIT B 8 CLARKSON: A follow up question and for staff I mean I can't remember the law are there expirations on these SMA permits or time limits it sounds like this is going to be a multi-year project. Do we "—" ROY: Ten (10)years to complete the project. CLARKSON: How long? ROY: 10 years. Condition three (3), construction of proposed facility improvements shall be substantially completed within 10 years. CLARKSON: No, okay. Thank you. REPLOGLE: I have a question. The lead removal is being done by DOT and that's where the lead is in their area of responsibility or is there lead removal involved in the County's area? Are you both doing that, I think it was answered but is that lead removal taken place simultaneously and the other question is while that lead removal is taken place is the public allowed to be down there around that? Thank you. KOMATA: So, again James from Parks and Recreation. So, as Alex had mentioned there are two (2) separate sources of lead contamination at the park. One is the bridge that DOT is responsible for and one is the buildings because of the probably the lead in the paint that was used in some other building materials in the past. So, between the State's responsibility and the County's responsibility there's a pretty clear demarcation as to what our scopes are. The County's is going to be addressing the lead in the soil source from the buildings and DOT will be addressing the lead in the soil from the bridge. The projects like I said earlier, DOT's project is anticipated to go first, and we'd like them to go through first address the soil area because again that's further into the site than ours it also impacts some of the improvements that we need to do such as the septic system for the new comfort station as well as a new comfort station in the new pavilion. So, if we don't have to have our contractor working in that hazardous material areas better for us and our contractors. So — REPLOGLE: Right. KOMATA: —that would go first, and the County project would go next. The intent is to address all of the current sources of known lead in soil contamination that could affect and would affect the public health and safety as well as that of our staff and maintenance crews. REPLOGLE: Okay. KOMATA: As far as where we are right now, we've in collaboration with DOT and Department of Health (DOH) their here office, you know we have been working with them to ensure that the public can continue to access the park in its current condition safely. Like I said we in conjunction with DOT had identified the area of high concern that has been fenced off or EXHIBIT B 9 secured, signs have been placed and we monitor the condition of the lawn and the soil there on a regular basis. So, we don't end up with a situation that exposes the public unnecessarily to a greater risk. REPLOGLE: Thank you. Are there any other questions from Commissioners? DARROW: Mr. Chairman? REPLOGLE: Yes. DARROW: This is Jeff with the Planning Department I wanted to just address a question that was brought up earlier by Commissioner Clarkson regarding the need of a permit for these remediation actions. We've had not a whole lot but a few of these types of remediation projects come through the Planning Department and the question always come up whether or not they require any type of SMA permit or County permit or State permit. There's this section in the Hawaii Revised Statutes, Section 128D-23. This is within the Environmental Response Law and as James had mentioned it's pretty much overseen by Department of Health Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response (HEER) Division. As long as you comply with that chapter your exempt from all State and County permits so, they have to work with that particular agency to come up with a remediation plan and follow that plan accordingly. So, I'm sure as James had mentioned that DOT as well as the County will be working with DOH and therefore the remediation portion would be exempt. KOMATA: In addition to that, this is James from Parks and Recreation. So, that is exactly what the next step in the process is for DOT. The DOH here office was on the call this morning and they emphasis the need to have, there is going to be a public notification input process that goes along with that exemption that Jeff pointed out. So, the public will be notified and will have an opportunity to provide input on that exemption procedure. REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. CLARKSON: Let me just follow up if I may please, I don't want to delay things but— REPLOGLE: Joe. CLARKSON: — is for Mr. Komata. It still isn't clear to me whether what County will be doing its lead remediation project simultaneously with the State remediation project under the bridge. I know how long these can take and I'm just wondering whether you were going to wait, the County will wait for the State to complete before they begin their lead remediation projects around the buildings. KOMATA: Yes, this is James from Parks and Recreation. We will wait for DOT to complete their work and leave the site and then we will implement our project which includes lead remediation as part of it immediately following their completion. Again, I'm not sure how much detail you guys get into in the background stuff but the lead remediation having to do with the bridge sourced areas extends anywhere from surface soil or top six (6) inches, top four(4) inches EXHIBIT B 10 all the way down to twenty-four(24)plus inches below surface. When we're looking at the conditions at the buildings, they are pretty much at the near the surface so, it's not as extensive a project. It is not as extensive of a component of our project as it is for the project you're envisioning for DOT. So, that's why I mean we have to regrade, we have to excavate for new foundation, new utilities, new pavement so all of that is going to occur in that top area. That's why all of that is going to go as part of our project and not a separate project. I mean if we did it a separate project that would extend out the whole delivery time and closure period for the park so, it doesn't, it is not efficient for us to do it that way. It's not in anyone's benefit for us to put that away from what I can see. CLARKSON: Will the park be closed during the DOT remediation project? KOMATA: Yes, it will be because they are going to have heavy equipment and trucks and everything moving through and access to the ocean and the stream is going to be extremely limited. It's just out of safety and allowing the DOT to perform their work as quickly as possible not draw it out. CLARKSON: Thank you. REPLOGLE: Thank you, anything else Commissioners? Okay, I'll entertain a motion for action. AU: Mr. Chair. REPLOGLE: Yes. AU: Motion. REPLOGLE: Please. AU: This is Commissioner Au, I move to approve Special Management Use Permit number 20-000077 as the Planning Director recommends with our amendment to Condition Number 11, to change the second sentence to the word"shall"to "should". RAFFIPIY: I second the motion. REPLOGLE: Thank you it's been moved and seconded and I believe staff does a roll call vote here. ROY: Okay, this is to approve with the amendments as Commissioner Au had stated. How do you vote Commissioner Au? AU: Aye. EXHIBIT B 11 JACKSON: Alex, can you hold the vote Alex. After the motion you need to offer discussion to the Commission before taking the vote. REPLOGLE: Okay, thank you. Is there any further discussion before we take our vote? CLARKSON: Yes, I have just a brief question still that I'd like to touch on regarding Condition 11 this drainage or storm water runoff mitigation. I'm assuming that much of the guide is incorporated into County ordinance and Public Works and the Building Department's requirements for this project. Is there anything that staff knows about that is in the guide that they think important that is not incorporated and if not, then why is the Condition there and if so, why hasn't that particular item been made as a Condition. I'm just a little bit confused about why we're having non-mandatory conditions. JACKSON: Hi, this is Maija Jackson. Commissioner Clarkson, so this is a guide that was put out by the State Office of Planning, and it was put out by their Coastal Zone Management(CZM) Division. Which regulates all of the land uses within the coastal zone particularly within the SMA area. So, this guide has not been adopted by the County, by the Public Works Department, and it is not in any of our zoning ordinances. It is just strictly a guidance document put out by the State CZM program. So, it isn't mandatory, but it does list some best practices, it gives pictures, it shows examples of how to implement storm water best management practices. CLARKSON: Is there any one of those practices that the Planning Department feels that it's important enough to be made into a Condition? JACKSON: We have not evaluated the guide thoroughly enough as a Department to determine to adopt it as part of Code or Rule as I said it's just strictly a guidance document and we encourage Applicants and Developers to use it but we're not mandating its use in anyway. Does that answer your question Mr. Clarkson? CLARKSON: That answers my question. My recommendation would be to hand out the guide and delete it as a condition in the future. REPLOGLE: Thank you. CLARKSON: That's all for me. REPLOGLE: It was moved by Commissioner Au and seconded by Commissioner Raffipiy and we've had the discussion staff, roll call vote please. ROY: Okay, Commissioner Au? AU: Aye. ROY: Commissioner Raffipiy? RAFFIPIY: Aye. EXHIBIT B 12 ROY: Commissioner Clarkson? CLARKSON: Aye. ROY: And Chair Replogle? REPLOGLE: Aye. ROY: Sorry, Vice-Chair Aguinaldo? I'm so sorry. AGUINALDO: Aye. ROY: Chair Replogle was aye. REPLOGLE: Okay, the ayes have it. ROY: Five to nothing is approved with the amendments as noted and the changes. Thank you. JACKSON: Okay John thanks for your help. The discussion ended at 10:22 a.m. Respectfully submitted, Melissa Dacayanan-Salvador Secretary Windward Planning Commission EXHIBIT B 13