HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-04-27 EMC Minutes Draft - VOLUME IENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
COUNTY OF HAWAIʻI
MEETING MINUTES – VOLUME I
Wednesday, April 27, 2022
9:05 a.m. to 3:44 p.m.
West Hawai‘i Civic Center, Kailua-Kona, and Zoom
Commissioners present:
Georjean Adams, Chair
Rick Gaffney, Vice Chair
John Burns
Melissa Cardwell
Dee Fulton
Lee McIntosh
Jon Olson
Elyse Robinson
County staff present:
Ramzi Mansour, Director
Sanne Berrig, Recycling Coordinator
Peter Sur, Secretary
Chris Sparber, Civil Engineer IV
Chris Chin-Chance, Recycling Specialist
Chris Laude, Civil Engineer V
David Thomas, West Hawai‘i Superintendent, WWD
Toni Nakatani, Highways Superintendent, DPW
Robin Bauman, Business Manager
Sinclair Salas-Ferguson, Deputy Corporation Counsel for EMC
Cody Frenz, Deputy Corporation Counsel for Appellee Mansour
Amy Miwa, Legislative Assistant, Council District 2
Others present:
David Henderson, Richard Henderson, Richard “Ritchie” Henderson II, Nancy Cook Lauer,
Michelle Sorenson, Others
1. CALL TO ORDER
Chair Adams called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m.
2
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 16, 2022 1
MOTION, SECOND, AND VOTE: Commissioner Robinson moved, to which Vice Chair Gaffney
seconded, to accept the minutes as presented. Ayes 6; (Cardwell, Gaffney, McIntosh, Olson,
Robinson, Adams); Absent 2 (Burns, Fulton)
3. STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIR
Chair Adams said the County has been having technological issues with Zoom meetings, and if
we have a glitch, we'll take a break and we'll try to reconnect. And if we can't reconnect within
30 minutes, we'll phone in. We'll just cross our fingers. It's all going to keep working. So thank
you.
4. PUBLIC STATEMENTS ON ITEMS ON THE AGENDA
No statements from the public.
5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Status report on 2022 EMC Commissioner Priorities – Each commissioner may provide a
brief update, if applicable.2
Vice Chair Gaffney reported that the State is anxious to proceed with sewering Honokōhau
Small Boat Harbor, but unfortunately the County is unable at this time to say when the North
Hawai‘i pump station is going to be online. And so that's giving the State pause because they
don't want to make the connection from Honokōhau. They're also reconsidering whether they
want to put in the return line to the wastewater treatment plant because they're concerned
that there may not be R-1 water available for quite some time. So the lack of any kind of
certainty on the County's part is now making the State concerned about spending money now
and then not being able to do the hookup. So it's kind of a frustrating situation because we
convinced the State that it was essential that they go ahead with getting away from the
injection wells that have been used at Honokōhau since it was built.
Commissioner Fulton said she emailed the Director and finally got established that she can
directly reach out to David Thomas. He would be the best person to get the chloride data that
she has been seeking for over a year. She had not reached out to David Thomas, but within her
district there is a sewer project on Ali‘i Drive right along the sea wall. She assumes assume that
that repair is probably overdue and that we have some corroded iron pipe or something going
on there. She is happy to see that this work is going on to reduce infiltration of sea water and
potentially exfiltration.
Director Mansour asked if Mr. Thomas could give his update, to which the Chair concurred.
Mr. Thomas, the West Hawai‘i Superintendent for wastewater operations, introduced himself.
He oversees the nine pump stations in West Hawai‘i along with the three wastewater
treatment plants, Honoka‘a, Kaloko, and Kealakehe. Last week we started doing what is called
CIPP, Cured In Place Pipe repair, he said. And so, we were able to finish from the pier back to
1 Agenda 2 - Minutes: http://records.hawaiicounty.gov/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=1&id=115752
2 Agenda 5a - http://records.hawaiicounty.gov/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=1&id=114388
3
The Fish Hopper restaurant, 36 feet. We did some televising at low tide just to see how much
water we might be dealing with at low tide when we were doing this work. And so we came out
with some chloride levels. And he would love to share that with the Commissioner. If she
wanted to come by or if he can get an email address, we can share them. It was kind of
interesting. So we're pretty much finished from Hulihe‘e Palace to the pier. We only have a very
small section, about 10 feet, that we have left that we need to do this repair on. But it's the
higher section of the pipe. We pretty much got anything that was in sea water at high tide. And
we are feeling positive about it. There are some other issues we might be looking at as a source
of chlorides. And we're going to start investigating it. We're going to find out where it’s coming
from, and we're going to seal the pipe up, if it's inflow and infiltration, whatever it is, we're
going to find it. We're looking for it now, actively investigating our sewer pipe to see where it's
coming from. Also, we're going after fats, oils, and greases that we weren't really doing before,
as aggressively as we should have. It’s good quality effluent. And the sand filters are coming.
We have a site. So, yeah, we're pretty jazzed over at the wastewater, he said.
Commissioner Fulton thanked Mr. Thomas for the update, and looked forward to meeting him.
Mr. Thomas shared a diagram on the screen and explained the work being done on Ali‘i Drive.
Commissioner Fulton asked about a rumor that the lateral serving the King Kamehameha Hotel
had been dug up and replaced. Was that true or not?
No, Mr. Thomas said. They've done some things when they were renovating, and we're trying
to figure out everything that they did. And we're going to start trying to get into the King
Kamehameha Hotel and talk to the management and see if we can figure out what's going on.
The high chloride levels are coming from that area is what we've determined since we started
doing more testing on it, because if we seal from the King Kamehameha going south and we still
have high chlorides at our Lanihau pump station, where is it coming from? It's got to be coming
from the King Kamehameha Hotel, the county bathroom, the showers. So we have kind of a
couple of different sources that are over there that we need to start identifying and start doing
lab testing on, and we're going to determine from those service laterals which one is giving us
those higher readings.
You can kind of see if you look at (the diagram) toward the front of the King Kamehameha
Hotel, that red line is our gravity sewer line, and it's part of the beach, it's part of the
restaurant, it's part of the pool, Mr. Thomas said. So it's going to be a very delicate time to work
in that area. We need to wait for the tourist season to die down just a little bit so we can get in
there and maybe do some more things. I don't want to stop their operations if we're going
there and start doing something, he said. Then we're going to work with their engineering
department because we already do. We're going to find it. We've already got the video along
Ali‘i Drive, and we've determined it's not as much there as it is someplace else.
We have a pump station behind West Hawai‘i Today that takes care of everything from the end
of the hotel there to the back side, which would be Kailua Bay Resort and the Honda dealership,
4
West Hawai‘i Today, and then Kailua Bay Resort. They have their own pump station and they
pump to us. And that's another source that we're looking at for chlorides.
But you get eight different pumps, so you get eight different readings of chloride. So you just
got to figure out which lateral you're going after. We're going to go after that. We did do a new
pump station behind West Hawai‘i Today that was one of our oldest pump stations. It went in
the ground in the 1960s, Mr. Thomas said. So this past year we just did a refurbishment of that
pump station, and now we're going to go after once we secure pumping and mechanical, we're
going to start going after sealing up the pipe there also. We think we have a little bit of it
coming through the manhole covers on the side because there is a lot of standing water. If you
get back in there, that water level is only about a foot below ground. That's saltwater.
b. Status report on action items from previous meeting
a. Next steps for exploring distributed composting
Chair Adams said that one discussion topic from the previous meeting that came up was about
the composting facility, and the fact that the contract with Hawaiian Earth Recycling is
presenting some communication difficulties on behalf of the Department. Nevertheless, it
seemed that it might be worthwhile to line up again discussion about, if we work out something
with HER, what are the next steps for looking into how we do distributed composting, or
decentralized composting, which is kind of the flavor of what everybody is thinking would be
useful on this island instead of having one facility, one faraway place. Back in December,
December 16, 2020, Michael Perrone gave a presentation and he made several different
recommendations during which he discussed what would be necessary. And he was
recommending at the time to establish a pilot program, looking at how we can set up
processing, making compost, collecting data for how much is going in and how much is going
out from each individual location, developing standardized best practices for safety and
technical aspects, developing a network of stakeholders, collectors and processors, and
coordinating between the County and State to establish clearly defined regulatory avenues for
all sectors. There is some state legislation which may impact some things that we could do, and
we'll hear about that a little bit later. The last thing he recommended was doing a needs
assessment and asset mapping, and those were all short-term aspects. Long term, he liked the
idea of innovation hubs, resilience hubs, to help do the coordination, having multiple
processing facilities and funding education. So those are recommendations. Are there some
next steps that we should begin looking at for, if we do want to go to decentralized compost
facilities, what's the next steps?
Commissioner Cardwell said her takeaway from the last meeting was that the contract with
HER is one of the main things that's kind of prohibiting our ability to move forward with this. So
it seems like that needs to be addressed first, because the contract with HER is for another 30-
some years. And until that's resolved, her understanding is that we kind of can't move forward
with the decentralized composting idea unless somehow HER were involved in that. If the plan
were able to evolve past this, having one centralized location, if HER were involved somehow in
helping the County to create a decentralized composting system, maybe that's a possibility. But
5
we don't have any information about what's going on with HER because of the possible
litigation.
Chair Adams said part of that depends on what the position is of the County, relative to how
much the HER contract blocks us from even thinking about another facility for composting. We
do have some private composters going on and exploring the ideas or the components which
were complex, as Mr. Pierron laid them out. Chair Adams would hate for us to waste time that
we might have for looking at just feasibility in general. What would it take? Is that such a high
hurdle that we should forget it, and be back to the same place with HER? She does not know
that we've examined it in enough depth to be able to say one way or the other, is this
something that we do want to begin exploring seriously, or we can put it off for another
decade, or two, or three?
Commissioner Cardwell said the public has made it clear that this is what people want. It's just
the bureaucratic red tape that seems to be the issue.
Commissioner Olson said the fact of the matter is that if you overlay this with the population
explosion and certainly in Puna that is going on, it's just going to crumble under its own weight.
We have to find other options.
Recycling Coordinator Sanne Berrig said we are in the final throes of waiting to hear if the
County, with its coalition, is going to be awarded a pot of money from the Build Back Better
challenge. One of the components that we worked with has to do with a partnership between
Mā‘ona Gardens and Evan Lam. If we are awarded that, part of that has to do with actually
starting doing scoping work, looking at the island as a whole and looking at resource districts,
and where would be logical places to expand and develop decentralized organics collections.
She hesitates to use the word composting at this point, because when we start looking at
composting facilities, we're looking at huge amounts of capital. But we're supposed to find out
something within the next month and a half. This is a completely separate matter, but it's
looking at a decentralized system, so to speak, of processing organic waste.
Chair Adams said there's also been a comment about providing more resources and technology,
big drums, for example, for home composting, which would not involve HER at all or the
County, even in terms of collection activities. But the idea is about education and getting
individual homeowners better ability to do their own compost.
Ms. Berrig said the County had that Earth Machine composter program, 10 or 12 years ago.
They handed out the Earth Machines, the home composting systems, and she could not
remember if they require the recipient to take some sort of a training, but that's something
that we want to put in place. The Deputy Director and Ms. Berrig are working on looking at
grants to get money to start up that program again. Kaua‘i County uses it as part of their
organics management because they capitalized it out over 10 years, and it’s costing them
maybe $8 per ton. They give out the containers, they figured they're going to last 10 years and
through attrition and breakage, they're still very active. And that's part of their actual solid
6
waste management program because of the cost, $8 per ton. So that's something that not only
has the added benefit of educating the public about the importance of keeping food waste and
organic waste out of the landfill, it's also a great way to save money. We are actively looking at
finding money to reboot that program again, she said.
If you look at the design components of the Ka‘ū Transfer Station and the Pāhoa Transfer
station, there were spaces allotted in those designs for composting commercial land otherwise
to be done there, and those elements were never fulfilled. So they're already on the books,
Commissioner Olson said.
Chair Adams suggested keeping this as an item on our agenda for follow up, about what the
status is, for the HER contract negotiations and other activities like supporting the home-type
or other private-public partnership types of activities. It frustrates her that we haven't made
more progress on composting so far.
b. Clarification on used battery collections – DEM website and beyond
Chair Adams asked Ms. Berrig to discuss about how batteries of various sorts can be handled in
the County, and what clarifications can be made for statements made during the March 16,
2022, meeting.
Ms. Berrig, the Recycling Coordinator, said we get a lot of phone calls with people uncertain
about the collection of e-waste as opposed to household hazardous waste. And there is some
confusion because there's a slight bit of overlap. Mr. K’s Recycle and Redemption has a pilot
program that takes alkaline batteries, and we will look at the website to see if there's anything
that we can clarify. Mr. K’s started a pilot program for alkaline batteries this last year. It's just
the basic little household batteries. Those batteries are not considered hazardous anymore. If
people ask us to put the alkaline battery in the landfill, we say yes, but besides that, we do
prefer that they bring them in to be recycled.
Home Depot does take rechargeable power tool batteries. As far as e-waste, the only type of
batteries that are collected are in a computer or built-in a in device. E-waste does not take
separate batteries, she said.
There were comments about the large auto and solar lithium batteries. Our state is super
progressive in a lot of environmental stuff, but we're also kind of slow and getting things
through. The state legal requirements for take back only applies to lead acid batteries. We hope
to get that changed real soon, Ms. Berrig said. Large lithium batteries, as you well know, are
extremely hazardous and very costly to recycle. That's one thing we want now that this session
is starting to wind down and start working on more aggressively with our legislators, to bring up
some more legislation that addresses some of this, to not have it be a cost that is covered solely
by taxpayers. As a pilot project and to gauge the current demand, the household hazardous
waste contract will accept five automotive lithium batteries per year included in our event
price. We do it per event. The additional cost, though, per unit is $50. We would much prefer to
see that cost collected when a car is sold or somehow like that. It's similar to the advanced
7
disposal fee because at the end of the day, as she is always complaining about, we end up
bearing the cost for this. Same thing with the ADF glass that didn't get far the session gain.
We're collecting glass based 28-year old collection fees. So we'd like to see something. And she
does not know if this goes within the County or is something that we can be looking at, but
collecting upfront is easier because it's really impossible to get the money after the fact. But if
you're spending $40,000 on a car, then let's take $50 or $60 of that, set it aside so when you
want to get rid of it or change out your battery, dispose of it, the taxpayers don't have to bear
the cost, Ms. Berrig said.
Regarding the e-waste and household hazardous waste collection events in Ka‘ū, currently we
have two in Kona per year, two in Hilo per year, and then one in the spring in Waimea and
Pāhoa. We suspended the e-waste collection at Wai‘ōhinu. There was a lot of advertisement,
but there was a really low turnout. And then the last household has this waste in Wai‘ōhinu was
in 2011 and 2012, the same thing. We did a lot of advertising and low turnout rates. We will
revisit that again, probably not this year, but next year because of cost. We're still in pain from
the COVID costs. We realize the population is growing. But the last time we did that it was a
super low turnout. So we just are forced to have it with the highest population areas we did
have. I think it was a year and a half ago. We had a little bit of money left over and so we did a
quick emergency e-waste collection in Waimea because we wanted to spend the e-waste
money that we had. So we quickly did one, got it out there.
Commissioner McIntosh asked if it were possible, rather than just having a single collection
point on that particular day, to collect from the other transfer stations and then merge it all
together at your main collection site. This is mostly about electronic waste because you're more
likely to have a computer or TV to toss than you are with the hazardous waste.
Ms. Berrig said that would be ideal, but it really gets into storage. It would never work for the
hazardous waste because our contractors come over from O‘ahu. But as far as the e-waste,
there's just not space. Then if there are vandals that get in and break it and you have problems
and having it on site, it would have to be (secured). It's something that has been looked at, but
there's just not the space. And she doesn't even know if storage is allowed for the permit.
Chair Adams said it could be an issue because a lot of electronics now have lithium batteries. So
having a pile of lithium batteries sitting in a hot transfer station in a bin some place until we can
get around to collecting it on a monthly basis or whenever the volume makes sense, could
present a hazard.
Chair Adams asked if there were other questions on the battery issues that Sanne was going
through. She liked the idea of going back through and looking at the website and seeing if there
are ways to clarify it for the general public. She had commented to the very first Environmental
Management Commission meeting that she attended as a new resident that having a bucket or
a box or whatever where you throw all your alkaline batteries is probably more hazardous than
just pitching them couple at a time in the trash because they do leak. They have acid in them.
It's not hazardous if you get some of that, you'll wash your hands and you throw it away. But if
8
you pile it all together so that they're kind of cooking, you are creating a hazardous waste. So
you need to be careful and think about it. It's not easy. It's not necessarily intuitive, Chair
Adams said. And once again, it goes to our challenge on education and communication. How do
we get the word out?
Commissioner McIntosh suggested that the website is a little confusing to find information. It
would be helpful to have a page dedicated to listing, if you have this, this is either the business
you can take it to, or this is a place you can toss it at because he has had to contact the
Secretary try to get some clarification. And it's not simple.
Our website definitely needs to be updated, Ms. Berrig said. She is in communication with our
management looking at ways of redoing. She would like to see a search field and you just type
in what you have or there's a list of A to Z, and then you click on that and then it takes you to
what your options are. There is a lot of information on the website and we have just not had
the opportunity to end the resources to redo it.
c. Preventing fires at the East Hawai‘i Reload and Sort Station.
Thank heavens nobody got hurt in the last fire, Chair Adams said. But it was a problem that isn't
going to be resolved immediately. We need new trucks. We've got permission to get the trucks,
but they aren't going to show up for a long time. So what are we doing today to make sure that
we aren't going to have another fire at the reload station?
Director Mansour said it was unfortunate we had the fire, not only because our trucks broke
down, but also we were not able to contract with a third party because of the Konno decision.
We had a meeting with the union members prior to the fire because we acknowledged in a
meeting with them that spontaneous combustion could be a result. So it was a health and
safety issue, and we brought it to their attention. But somehow they drew that line where we
cannot get a third party. Unfortunately, two days later, the fire happened because of
spontaneous combustion. Hopefully, moving forward, it is about health and safety. And he
spoke with the Mayor and our Corporation Counsel and the Department of Health, and we
would take the risk on hiring a third party because, having a fire, it could have been way worse
than what happened. It could have hurt our employees, it could have damaged the entire
building. Thanks to the Fire Department and some of the staff who noticed it early in the start,
they were able to go there and put out the fire. It's a challenge, but we are trying to work with
everyone so we could do what we need to get that waste moved from the east to west. And
we're going to continue working with everyone, but we may be faced with challenges as well.
Chair Adams said dealing with health and safety is critical, number one. We went through all
the rounds on the trailers going in, it's a safety issue. But this one is a fire, and we had one. So it
isn't a hypothetical issue. We had a fire. It is reasonably expected if you have piles of waste that
you're not quite even sure what else is in there, you have got to be moving it constantly so that
there isn't a large quantity there. And the Konno decision is on her priority list. And so it
particularly aggravates her to hear that as the excuse. Chair Adams wants to emphasize, that
putting our employees, putting other employees, the firefighters, at risk because they won't let
9
us hire anybody to do an emergency action to remove the waste is unacceptable. And she
thoroughly supports “just do it.” And if they sue, you've got a perfect argument to make in
court that you're protecting life, immediate risk to life.
Director Mansour said we did hire a third party hauler during December 2021, and we got a
letter to cease and desist from the union's attorney just a day after we hired the hauler to move
that waste. So we have been through that route before where we had a cease and desist order
from their attorney. And just to get a contract, that must go through our Department of Human
Resources to approve the contract.
Chair Adams asked if there are emergency procedures when it's an issue of imminent risk.
We talked to our Corporation Counsel as well, Director Mansour said, because it is a health and
safety emergency. It’s just a challenge to deal with what the union laid out in comparison to
what we need to do. From the last cease and desist order, it seemed like there was no appetite
to do it. But now we have a fire, we had better build an appetite to move forward, because that
fire could have really hurt some of our employees as well.
Commissioner Olson said when they built the facilities that are being used now, the question of
a fire suppression system was brought up and fell on deaf ears. You would think that the union
also could have weighed in on that one, right? Because it's their workers that it would protect
but they didn't get a lot of help.
Commissioner McIntosh asked if, when it comes time to renegotiating the union contracts,
could the Mayor push for some kind of emergency clause that when something like this
happens or potentially could happen, that you have the freedom to hire a third party
temporarily? Because otherwise, then why isn't the union helping to solve the problem? If
they're going to keep you from fixing it, then they should fix it, he said.
Director Mansour said they anticipated DEM to have more equipment, more staff, and their
point of view is, well, you guys should have had twice the amount of equipment. So if you break
down, at least you have a spare. But that doesn't work that way. But they definitely see the
world in a different perspective from we do running the business. That's going to continue. It's
not an easy fix. It's a Supreme Court decision, but we're going to continue navigating through it.
That's the reason we had the meeting with them prior to the fire happening. It's just to say,
hey, how could we work together to get it done?
Commissioner Cardwell asked if there is a possibility to put a clause in the collective bargaining
agreement to say that in the case of an emergency, it is possible for DEM to hire a third party. Is
that possible? When do the union contracts get renegotiated?
Director Mansour said it is more of a Corporation Counsel issue because they look at the
definition of an emergency. The Mayor has to issue a proclamation to be able to declare it as
emergency. We tried that route because every day we deal with health and safety issues to the
10
public, whether it is wastewater or solid waste. We try to sit down with the union and talk to
them, but they look at it as a court decision, and even our own County looks at it as a court
decision. So, you cannot renegotiate it back with the union because the court has spoken,
right? It's complicated, we have been trying to work on it since we started. That's why the
Mayor tried to do that public-private partnership bill that we tried to pass for the last two years
to allow us, even in the wastewater, to be able to navigate through public-private partnerships
to get us through some of these emergency and health and safety issues as well.
Chair Adams said her concern is that there are degrees of risk. And when we're talking about
the likelihood of fire from a pile of trash that isn't being managed appropriately, i.e., moved out
and put into a sanitary landfill with cover, that's at the extreme, you're heading toward 100
percent risk as opposed to other risks that we're dealing with. There are low-level risks and
there are other risks, like the potential for fire, that are much, much higher. Today we have a
high risk we need to deal with. She doesn’t know if it would help in any way to have the
Commission to write a letter to Corporation Counsel, or if we are just hearing commentary
today; something like, this is important and fight it, take it to court if you must.
Director Mansour said if it happens again, our intent is to get a third party.
6. NEW BUSINESS
a. EMC recommendations for:
a. Priority topics for the new Information & Education Specialist position.
It looks like DEM is going to get a new position for public information, Chair Adams said. How
soon that person is going to be able to be hired and show up and start working? It's going to be
a while, but the Chair would like to talk about or provide some guidance from EMC on what are
the issues that we think ought to be assigned to that person as soon as he or she shows up.
One, obviously, is going to be the outreach to any community that's going to be affected by
significant projects that DEM is working on, including Pāhala and Nā‘ālehu, but also Ali‘i Drive
activities and whatnot. But are there some things you can start thinking about that we think
there ought to be strong focus for that wonderful person that's going to do all education and all
public communications in his or her spare time?
Director Mansour said it's going to be one person to start and he or she is going to be working
with our IT staff as well to figure out how we're going to manage our website, social media,
how we're going to start improving on the outreach as well. So hopefully that person doesn't
get burned out and quit on us. But there's going to be a lot of work. Usually once the budget is
approved, by July 1, we'll go out for recruitment. And his experience is that things will take
time. Look at the Planner position. We got it approved last year just when I started, he said. We
still haven't secured a planner. It has been a year and a few months. It took that long. And
finally we were able to do some interviews. We offered the position to one of our current staff.
She's going to start May 1, but it took about a year just to secure that one vacancy. So we have
got to be optimistic.
11
Chair Adams said her perspective is that it isn't a huge rush for us to give the definitive list, but
she would like to start thinking about, what are the areas that we see on behalf of our
constituents that we need to get information out? She went back and looked at the integrated
solid waste management plan, which but every other paragraph talks about education and
outreach. It was the No. 1 priority that SWAC put out, and it was across all sorts of aspects. It
was to talk to the public and raise awareness. And that was where her questions that we are
deferring (to next meeting) on how much does it really cost to dispose of waste, to recycle
something? And it varies by depending on what material you're talking about. Recycling is taken
to the transfer station, which right now costs zero dollars upfront. It's hidden to a degree in our
property tax, but most people look at it as free service from the County. So part of our
challenge is to educate the public on, there is no such thing as a free lunch. You're paying for it.
It's costing money. It's taking the County a lot of effort to make sure that they handle the
materials that you're either flushing down the drain or disposing of. But that was part of the
reason she asked to start thinking about what it is we need to do. We need to generate more
revenue. We need to educate people on why it's worth more money to support the activities
that go on. We've talked many times about recycling and people don't know where to go. They
don't know what to take. We talked about batteries. There are lots of areas around that just to
let the public know what they could do today, much less what they're going to do after Ms.
Berrig gets done fixing everything there is to fix in the recycling business. There were other
educational activities listed in the integrated solid waste management plan, not only to the
public, but also to businesses and particularly small businesses, and how they can reduce the
generation of waste in the first place, doing audits, et cetera. So there are several different
things that she put on a list, and if you have some additional ones, bring them to the next
meeting or you can email them to me, Chair Adams said. She will add them to the list and hopes
that we would have time next meeting to talk about ideas, but be thinking about it in the
wastewater treatment arena. Again, you've already got it high on your list to do public
education, particularly for the communities that are affected. But in general, again, consider
the true cost, not only the economic cost to the county, but also the environmental costs of the
need for wastewater treatment and what happens to our waters when we let it go. And if
there's some other comments people have of things that you think are big holes this new
person would have to cover.
Commissioner Robinson asked if this will be a permanent position. The Director said he is
hoping it is a permanent position.
Commissioner Olson said his biggest concern is the complexity of getting your solid waste to
some place, being that in Puna, basically, you're invited to get onto the deadliest highway in the
State and drag your trash with you when you go. And we have been trying since Day 1 to get
more availability within the subdivisions. If it isn't going to be a trial by combat, you're far more
likely to get people to be cooperative. We've got to get them on our side all the way. And the
only way you're going to do that is to make it available. His experience, at least in Puna, has
always been that issue is, I've got to get in a car, spend gas and time, and risk my life doing it.
12
That's not what the new position is going to address, Chair Adams said. What the person is
going to address is, there's a need and here are the solutions for it. And, oh, by the way, it's
going to take work from all of us to make it happen.
Director Mansour added that at the last meeting he mentioned having given the offer for the
solid waste division chief. He had some bad news to report: The person declined to offer. We
offered the position to two people and both of them declined due to logistics moving from
different place to here, and the cost. The cost of living here keeps going up. And it's hard to
recruit. We are back to the drawing board on recruiting. In addition to that, we asked for either
$300,000 or $500,000 to do operational planning. And we were granted that money for FY 22-
23. So once again, the Mayor is listening to our needs and we understand we have a piece of
the pie that we share with everybody else's. But the good news is we are getting money to do
more of the operational planning for the solid waste and also to assist us on whether
continuing the landfill is the way to continue operating our facilities. That current landfill could
cease operation in 15 to 20 years. So we need to start planning now so we don't get in the same
predicament as we were when the Hilo landfill shut down, because it takes about 12 years to
site a new landfill. We need to start looking at that now so we'll have a better plan moving
forward.
Chair Adams asked commissioners who have any other comments about topics for the
information specialist to bring them to her attention to be discussed at the next meeting.
b. The Integrated Wastewater Management Plan to address long-term budget
planning issues.
Chair Adams said the idea of developing an integrated wastewater management plan was
something that looks like it is going to be approved. She and Vice Chair Gaffney had put
together some thoughts, and wanted to share them for discussion. And DEM can hire a
contractor to put together those individual pieces. But the two thought there are some key
parts that need to be upfront and part of that master plan, specifically: a vision statement.
What are we working toward? We have commented before to DEM and the Council that we
really would like to see a mindset switch to water resource management rather than
wastewater disposal. How do we manage that chunk of the life cycle of water for the benefit of
our County and environment? So as an example, we could have an aspirational goal. It's kind of
the zero waste concept of no contaminated water. Now, DEM does not have jurisdiction over
all water that gets released to the environment. So, looking at it more within the charter of
DEM is that, DEM practices sustainable wastewater resource management on Hawai‘i Island or
that we're integrated with water supply, with agricultural use, with all the ways that water gets
discharged to the environment. We don't want contaminated water escaping into the
environment. That's kind of the vision statement of what everything should be working toward.
And then maybe some guiding principles, such as: Applying a life cycle assessment to minimize
adverse effects. It's a sustainability issue, water resource management versus wastewater
management. Being affordable and reliable. Don't over-engineer things. It's kind of the concept
that is sustainable both financially as well as from a health and environmental standpoint, that
13
it factors in expected growth, that it's got continuous improvement as part of it; and that you're
going to work with public and private entities to achieve those goals.
And then the bulk of the integrated plan being how you're going to do that, and assessing the
different areas we've got, every area on the island is different. We don't have a single solution
for anything. And so going through looking at population, looking at land use, looking at the
facilities we already have on hand, having sections that evaluate what we've got now, what we
think we need, where the capacity is going to need to grow, issues around financial feasibility
and regulatory compliance, and then another section that would look at alternatives for
collection and treatment systems, and evaluate that by the different districts, and then go into
the more nuts and bolts that I think you're more overwhelmed with right now, and that is
facility-specific plans. And to look at those in terms of current system improvements, needed
repairs, etc. And then 5-year, 10-year, 15-year improvement plans, have a section on financing
and funding options, a section on opportunities and challenges, including partnerships, legal
issues and jurisdictional issues and social issues, and then conclusions and recommendations,
and then have an appendix that has every one of the facilities and all the gory details that
you're dealing with.
So it's kind of at that level of guidance of what are the important components and how the
individual facility plans integrate. Chair Adams said when she listens to the presentation, what
she doesn’t want to see is that the integrated plan is just a staple together of facility plans. It
needs to be in a larger context of this is how we're looking at managing wastewater and why
we're going to do what we're going to do, how we're going to get there, and then go to the
detail of the individual operations. What kind of context would we like to see in an integrated
wastewater master plan? She asked the Vice Chair to add more.
Vice Chair Gaffney said it is has been set up now so that the EMC Chair and the Vice Chair meet
with the Chair and the Vice Chair of the Regenerative Agriculture, Water, Energy, and
Environmental Management Committee (Tim Richards and Holeka Inaba, respectively) on a
regular basis. And this idea of an integrated wastewater management plan came out of that
meeting, and it came out in kind of an odd way. Council Member Richards basically said, why
doesn't the Commission create the wastewater management plan for the County? Vice Chair
Gaffney pointed out that none of us have the educational background or the depth of
experience to do something like that. That was obviously a task for a qualified consultant.
However, he and Chair Adams took it to heart and immediately started Googling wastewater
management plans for other municipalities around the country, around the world, and got
some good ideas from that about where this should go. The Vice Chair said we don't want to be
the wastewater management planners. That's much too big a responsibility. But what Chair
Adams has set out here is our perception of a broader starting point, and certainly everyone
should participate in that in the future and ideally in the long run, we end up with a consultant.
Vice Chair Gaffney’s hope is that EPA will recognize the value of this County setting down in
writing timelines and cost estimates and the kind of long-term recycling sustainability program
that we want to have in this county. And the EPA potentially will come in with money to
support this planning process as well. So that may be a pipe dream, but he really hopes
14
something like that can happen to support this effort because it's logical. We have a solid waste
management plan. We should have a wastewater management plan too.
Director Mansour said we had a community meeting with the Puna district. We had $2.2 million
that was through the U.S. Economic Development Administration to look at the feasibility study
for the potential of getting wastewater services to that district. In addition to that, in Puakō, we
got the $1.5 million released from the Governor. Plus we got about $300,000 from County
matching funds. We're going to end up doing more comprehensive wastewater plans. So the
the $500,000 that we budgeted is not enough, as you know, based on what Chair Adams’ list is.
So our goal was to get that $500,000 in addition to the other decentralized areas and make a
big master plan out of all that, because it's definitely different areas. So, going in with the
$500,000 to bring all the other studies together and put a more county-wide wastewater
integrated management plan, or master plan is the intent where the $500,000 is going to come
into play. But having the $500,000 do a countywide integrated plan, technically it's not enough
money and we probably could not have gotten any more than the $500,000. But with the idea
that we're going to capture and maximize the usage of the other plans, then we could put them
together and that become our integrated waste management plan islandwide.
Director Mansour continued: So that's some of the challenges where on the east side. We're
going to look at the possibility maybe from Kea‘au all the way down to Hilo. Maybe you run a
sewer collection system with a force main and bring it to Hilo rather than start a different
facility for the entire district. So we're looking at multiple options. AECOM is our consultant.
These discussions started. We did presentation to Ashley Kierkiewicz's and Matt Kāneali‘i-
Kleinfelder's district. So that's going to continue. There's so many parts in motion as we speak,
but the end vision is trying to create that countywide integrated plan or a master plan, at least
with the amount of funding and the resource we have in addition to your vision.
The administration has tasked us to start looking at strategic action planning. And so we revisit
our vision and mission, our core values and definitely our vision, we need to share it with you
because our Department’s vision is going to drive everybody else's visions as well. We need to
make sure that we capture some of your vision. But the vision that we came up with is to
convert materials recovery from solid waste and wastewater into energy and agricultural
sustainability, the Director said.
So our goal is, from solid waste and waste management, we deal with a lot of the resources
that we could put back in the economy. And part of it is if we could capture the methane gas
into electricity or extract the hydrogen from it for transportation, that would be a win for us.
But that's the vision to get there to become sustainable and stop landfilling and start capturing
these resources, either through material recovery or some type of recovery that we need to
start thinking about. We don't have soil on the island. The mulch is a high (value) commodity.
Our sludge is also considered a high value commodity, but now it's going to the landfill. So as
part of the Hilo design, we're looking at how we're going to capture those biosolids and put it as
fertilizer. People may not accept the fact, but it is a good fertilizer, once you process it well. So
15
there is also that being in motion. We've been having a lot of different meetings with
consultants and trying to get there.
We got the money to rebuild Hilo WWTP. Let's rebuild it with the right mind and thinking rather
than just replacing with the same. So our goal is if we could capture it, if we could expand the
customer base, that mean we could expand on the gas generation, we could expand on the
sludge generation. That means energy, that means ag use. It all adds up together. Our mission
is to provide a responsible, comprehensive, safe and efficient management of wastewater and
solid waste resources by building and replacing the dilapidated facilities with the new
technologies that maximizes water reclamation and put it back to use gas generation, biosolids
and green waste composting. So that's in our mission. For us to achieve that vision, we need to
be clear on how as a Department we are taking the mission and running with it. And we have
set up our core values: Mutual respect, professionalism integrity, transparency, quality,
teamwork, dedication, innovation, visionary, and open to new ideas, as always. Then after we
set up that we created what we call goals and objectives. Now we got a clear vision, we got a
mission. How could we start becoming more sustainable within our own island to capture all
these resources, from water reclamation to solid waste, gas generation, diversion, et cetera. So
we came up with a bunch of different goals and objectives that will have a milestone, and
become our roadmap to be able to achieve the vision that we set out to accomplish. He was
still planning to work with staff because without having the staff input, the vision becomes
useless. He could share it with the Commission and they could comment on it.
Chair Adams said that is definitely the kind of thing that is part of our charter, to provide
guidance and oversight on what you are looking at as your vision, and to emphasize those
things that we think are important. And that was kind of the spirit, at least that she and the Vice
Chair were looking at in the wastewater arena of, how do we layer within that overall vision
and goals, so that everything you're doing is directed toward those higher, broader vision
statements, objectives that you're trying to work at. It's so easy and you've got so much
pressure and time and no money and no staff to just do the minimum job of what is sitting in
front of your face today. Chair Adams said she is a “vision lady.” She wants to see how that it
fits in an overall construct, and then hopefully it'd be something that would survive this
administration, because nothing's going to get fixed in two years. It's going to be decades. And
so how do we have a path that we get there? So she would definitely like to see it. It's still a
good idea that on parallel we as a Commission look at what are our ideas, because it sounds
like we've got a lot of good overlap. And she would be surprised if we come back and say,
“You're just wasting your time, Ramzi, that's nothing.” We do have some convergence, but it's
fair as well. And we have an obligation as a Commission to provide you with our thoughts and
guidance.
Commissioner Robinson asked what the Chair needs from the Commission to support the plan,
which sounds like a big, hairy, audacious goal to put together, this integrated water resource
management plan.
16
Chair Adams said she would send out the proposal, and it's a very rough outline to everybody,
and she asks that members make a comment and alternative suggestions. She was trying to
stay 20,000, 30,000 feet up. But if there are items that you would like to see added, then she
will take a shot at collating it and we could talk about it the next meeting. Unfortunately, she
read an article this morning that said you can't do creative brainstorming on Zoom. We will try,
she said. We'll see whether we can get some information or some thoughts down and then we
can go through it and walk through it at our next meeting.
Vice Chair Gaffney agreed. Basically what the Chair has created is a very rough draft, a very
beginning outline, he said. So each one of you has a particular interest from your community,
particular knowledge sets, et cetera, and just read it and go, oh, what about, what about, what
about. Let's add some of those “what abouts”; let's add some possibilities. The Director said
maybe it would make more sense to run this long, downhill sewage system. Well, guess what?
You can generate hydro power from a long, downhill sewage system. So let's brainstorm it. And
by the time we have a contractor online to do the actual plan, we're going to be able to present
a lot of ideas to open the door. And that's where the Chair and the Vice Chair want to go with
this. We don't see us building this whole thing. We see it as handing it off, but providing a
contract with a really good starting point.
Chair Adams said she would love to be able to incorporate things the Director already put
together. It’s got to be iterative, it's got to be alive. So it needs to be a community effort.
c. Revisions to the Hawai‘i County Code and the DEM Administrative Rules.3
Chair Adams said the Director has already told us that they're looking at pretreatment code
changes which mostly apply to commercial operations, but by the same token, just clarifying
where the codes need to be fixed, need to be improved, maybe some dramatic changes, maybe
some minor changes, that we could go through and line-item as some comments back to DEM
on what we'd like to see changed. There obviously were some issues raised with today’s
contested case hearing, but there are plenty of other issues. An example that the Chair put in
there was at one time there was proposed back in 2019, a whole section on laterals, and it got
dropped. Is that something we want to make sure gets put back into the code (or the rules). So
those kinds of things and again, think about what they should be and be prepared to talk about
them next time, she said.
Commissioner Cardwell said she would mention it at the next meeting, but that there needs to
be something in the County code about volume and people being charged for the volume of
water usage, sewer usage. That just seems really important. The flat rate fee doesn't make any
sense, she said. She wanted to just get that on the record.
Chair Adams asked Commissioner Olson to comment on the historical reason for the billing.
3 Agenda 6a(c) – Example – 2019 proposed DEM Rule Article III, Rule 20:
http://records.hawaiicounty.gov/weblink/DocView.aspx?dbid=1&id=115746
17
Commissioner Olson noted that he comes from a district that does not have a single public
sewer system. And of course, now it's the most populous district on the island. And at the rate
the building is going on right now, Puna is going to be the island at this point. They are building
like crazy out there and we have no infrastructure to deal with it. No roads, no water, but here
they come. And this is all the wonders of 1960. If you haven't read “Land and Power in Hawai‘i”
yet, all you have got to do is go to the chapter on Puna and you'll know all you need to know
about where our troubles lie, he said.
7. REPORTS/CORRESPONDENCE
Director’s Informational Report. (Note: the report is posted online with the agenda under
www.hawaiicounty.gov>Our County> County Calendar> (Meeting date).
a. Legislative update
Chair Adams asked for any legislative updates.
Director Mansour said Recycling Coordinator Berrig has been working hard on following
legislation. She's been working with Council members, and representatives from the House and
the Senate on getting some of these bills going through. The extended producer responsibility
bill seemed like it's moving and taking some steps forward. He asked if there was any bill in
particular to be followed up on.
Chair Adams said there's going to be a certain amount of delay, as the state DOH needs to do
things before you'd get hauled in, having to do things. It seems like the electronics bill, if that
one passes, and the EPR, certainly, it's going to be another demand on your time and resources
to figure out how you're going to administer the whole thing and what you're going to do with
it. And as a former Solid Waste Advisory Committee member, the idea of, oh, holy moly, got to
do another needs assessment on recycling, boggles her brain. These are the repercussions that
may or may not occur.
b. Requests for Updates.
a. Actions discussed with EPA Region 9 in April
i. EPA call regarding Administrative Order on Consent for closure of
large capacity cesspools in Pāhala and Nā‘ālehu on April 1.
Chair Adams invited the Director to discuss the conversations he has been having with the
Environmental Protection Agency. It sounds like good news on the large capacity cesspools.
Director Mansour said it is definitely good news on trying to revisit the current AOC on Pāhala
and Nā‘ālehu. We started the process and hopefully DEM’s Counsel Malia Kekai will be working
with their attorney on finalizing that aspect of that revision.
Commissioner McIntosh read that the solution for the County is to essentially build a septic
tank for each separate system for each house on the gang cesspool. Since the houses already
have pipes running through them, would it be possible to convert the gang cesspools to a septic
system? And then that way the individual homeowners won't be responsible for having to
empty or clean out their septic systems every couple of years? And then the County could
18
continue charging them the fees. It would be less money to do that solution rather than digging
up everybody's yard.
Director Mansour said this started with a design for an aerated lagoon. And our goal was too
expensive. And when we first came board, we recommended the package unit. And then that
evolved to possibly individual wastewater systems (IWS) to be able to use that as a model for
the whole state because we have in the County of Hawai‘i about 55,000 cesspools. The goal was
to create a pilot program within that community, that could be utilized statewide because
we're going to go through certain challenges as we do it, and then the entire state could benefit
from that as well, learn from our experience. The Department of Health was on board with that
and EPA told us, yeah, we'll be on board as well. So the way it's going to be negotiated is we're
going to provide two options of a package unit and two options of IWS, and they're going to
allow us to do the engineering report, analysis and evaluation. So the good thing is everybody
agrees the aerated lagoon is not the way to move forward, and a package unit or IWS is the way
to move forward.
Commissioner McIntosh asked about Nā‘ālehu. For the community, from his understanding,
there is not enough room for IWS to be placed on each TMK. Does the county have a solution
for that TMKs that are too small for that, or would you be able to convert the gang cesspools to
septic systems rather than digging holes in the ground and laying pipe or whatnot?
Director Mansour said he does not think the Department of Health will approve a community
septic tank. That also defeats the purpose of an injection well, as well because you have more
accumulative flow flowing into that structure. So you might as well go with a package treatment
to secondary treatment level. But the idea with the individual septic tanks, yes, the entire state
is working on cesspool conversion, and there's a public report you could access through the
State, they have addressed the issue of the small lots versus areas right on the shoreline. So
there is a different alternative. As we move forward, the Department of Health will be willing to
issue a waiver if the size of the lot is too small. Anything prior to 1990 could be grandfathered in
and especially with these plantation homes, if it's a smaller lot, you could go vertical seepage
pit rather than a horizontal leach field. Dr. Rick Bennett has done a study about the layer cake
solution, and also we presented that to EPA as well because that could also extract nitrogen
and phosphorus for better leaching of the effluent. So we will be entertaining some of these
design criteria as we do our preliminary engineering report for the IWS. IWS could be an
aerobic treatment unit as well. So if you have a small lot we could use ATU, that gives you a
great treatment, but it takes a smaller space as well to construct.
Commissioner McIntosh asked about the County spending a lot of money coming up with the
aerated lagoon system and there wasn't enough generated waste to sustain it. Is there any way
the County is going to get any of their money back from a useless plan that even if the County
had the money to build, it wouldn't have worked? Is there anything the County can do to get
any money back or is it just flushed down the toilet, so to speak?
19
Director Mansour said unfortunately, he doesn’t know what type of instructions they were
given by a prior administration or prior director. It’s hard to go back and try to say, okay, you
guys have something that may not work. So it could be driven by our own people? He doesn’t
know. So to answer the question, no, it's hard to go back and recoup some of that money.
Commissioner Fulton agreed. Looking at the presentation, she had questions about what the
individual homeowner is going to be responsible for if they are forced to go to this layer cake
system. If they have a lot size large enough to accommodate that standard layer cake system,
what exactly are the dimensions? Because maybe the dimensions are on this little picture, but
she was not seeing them. What's the footprint and what's the depth that has to be excavated?
It depends on the permeability, Director Mansour said. The consultant will be doing
permeability testing on each lot, and the leach field will be designed based on the permeability
needs. A standard design is 3 feet deep. It could be sand, soil, wood chips, it could be the
current existing condition. So without having the permeability, it's hard to tell what type of soil
you need to import. So the idea is, yes, we'll be looking at a consultant that will be doing
individual lot analyses and running permeability tests for each site as well.
Commissioner Olson said that for Pāhala the sugar companies put the housing there because
they couldn't grow anything on it. It's a solid basalt structure.
Commissioner Fulton said if it's solid basalt and the water is not going anywhere, then it would
have to be excavated.
Director Mansour agreed. It depends on the size of the lot. If it's 10,000 square feet, you could
do a horizontal excavation and you have to import 3 feet of soil. And we anticipate if we go to
that level, Wastewater Alternatives and Innovations (WAI) had done a pilot program in the
Puna district, late last year, and it ended up costing them about $40,000 to import soil from
O‘ahu to create that leach field and what have you. So even if we take that high estimate,
multiply it by the 175 homes, we're looking at $7 million $8 million versus $50 million for the
cost of construction. But that's why we need to do the preliminary engineering report. He
cannot prejudge and tell you what we're going to do without doing the analysis and doing the
four options that EPA told us we need to do, which includes the package units and entertaining
the IWS. So as we do the preliminary engineering report and meet with the communities, we'll
have a better idea which one is going to pan out to be the best.
Commissioner Fulton said she is aware that the layer cake system was developed for locales
that had sandy substrates like Long Island, N.Y., and Florida. Their concern there was that for
the leach fields, the stuff went through too fast.
And that's true for the lava rock, the Director said. So the idea is to prevent it from going too
fast, you need to import soil to be able to meet the requirement of DOH at a certain rate.
20
Commissioner Fulton asked if there is any concern that if we get heavy rains, someone will
basically have a septic swimming pool in his or her backyard.
All that will be looked at during the permeability testing, Director Mansour said. If you have
biological clogging or if you have clay, you're not going to improve the percolation rate. And
you're right, you could have a swimming pool with sewage in your backyard, but everything has
to be designed accordingly. The type of soil is very important, he said.
Would some homes require an aerobic treatment unit in conjunction with the layer cake
system, Commissioner Fulton asked. Where does that come into play? An ATU speeds up the
whole breakdown process.
Director Mansour said the ATU unit is a better septic system, which is to treat the effluent to a
better quality. And it's recommended for homes right on the shoreline, close to the shoreline,
because it gives you a better treatment, not like the septic tank itself, but you still have a leach
field.
Chair Adams said there's a whole lot of detail for each individual kind of fix, if you will. And
being site-specific is something you're just going to have to work through. The good thing she is
hearing is we have maybe too often looked at the ultimate Cadillac solution, as Mr. Jerome
Warren always describes it, rather than something that will work. It's also kind of like Ms. Berrig
was saying that we buy everybody an Earth Machine and it costs piddles next to how much it
would cost to dispose of the organics. So sometimes some simple solutions can work. And she
is glad to hear that you're looking at those various alternatives. And if you really want to deep
dive, go look at all that stuff that the Cesspool Conversion Working Group on the state level put
together. It has tons of background information on the kinds of technology and problems and
financial impacts and all sorts of great studies on all the different alternatives. And maybe at
some point we'd want to have a full description of that group's findings and what they're still
working on for EMC. On the other hand, DEM has a relatively narrow area of responsibility,
which means EMC also has a fairly narrow one, and it's managing the disposal sites we have,
and not necessarily planning all the solutions for every water issue that exists in this county. So
if you go do some of that homework and maybe she can again send you links to that study.
There's a lot of really good meat there, she said. Her question to the Director is, how are you
working with the community and getting input? Who are you talking to? And we've seen from
our testifiers, you need to communicate with the people who are going to be directly affected.
So what's your communication plan for this changing situation?
That is great comment, Director Mansour said. He said he is a member of the Cesspool
Conversion Working Group that the state has. He does attend their meetings. He is familiar
with what the committee is proposing and what we've been working on for the last year. But as
far as communication, yes, that was EPA’s major concern because the County needs to
communicate with your people within the community. So we heard that loud and clear. We
cannot keep them in the dark. We need to have more communication, more public meetings.
We have been fortunate that the Mayor also had an approved request for us for a public
21
information officer in FY 22-23. So we're going to have that individual start to do more of the
public outreach, and we need to do more of the public meetings. We need to create a website
that is dedicated to what's going on in Pāhala and Nā‘ālehu, because we're going to have a
limited time window to come in and finish it. Because EPA is not going to tolerate any more
delays. And it is understandable. The idea now we need to take it and run with it and have a
better detail and a roadmap how we're going to get there. We cannot afford delays. We cannot
afford not having the public involved. It’s going to take a lot of effort on our part. As you know,
we are short-staffed. We have one engineer on the east side, one engineer on the west side for
the whole island. And $1 billion worth of projects. But our engineers are doing a great job.
They're working overtime, they're working weekends. But we try our best to deliver based on
the resources that we have.
Commissioner Robinson asked whether there will be an expectation of homeowners to directly
finance or bear the cost of the conversion. I guess it depends on which direction you go, she
said.
Unfortunately, no, Director Mansour said. The County is going to bear the cost because we
have a contractual obligation, so it's our responsibility.
Those communities don't have a lot of resources, Commissioner Olson said.
Commissioner McIntosh asked whether has the County decided, after building the wastewater
treatment units, to continue to charge them sewer fees, or would that end?
That depends, Director Mansour said. If we go with the IWS and they want us to continue
maintaining it, they continue paying the fees. If they opt out, then they have to maintain that
septic and the leach field themselves. So there's the option.
Would that be up to each individual owner or would that just be a collective decision,
Commissioner McIntosh asked.
Based on the community meeting we had, it seemed like they saw it as a saving to them. So
they're probably going to opt to have the county doing the maintenance for them. So they're
probably going to opt to pay the approximately $45 a month.
Commissioner McIntosh said it's probably cheaper than what they charge to clean out a system
whenever it needs to be cleaned.
The good thing with septic is that it would get cleaned once every five to 10 years, the Director
said. So it depends on the usage. But yes, every five years or so, you could pump it.
ii. EPA site visits to Hilo WWTP and Kealakehe WWTP on April 6.
Director Mansour noted that EPA came and visited both the Hilo and Kealakehe Wastewater
Treatment Plants. It was raining so hard that they couldn't stand outside for a long time. It was
22
raining that day, but they were able to visit both locations. And there are some changes that we
need to do and we are doing it, just for the Hilo facility. We already got the funding that we
need to start the design process, which we already begun with the consultant. So we are also
entertaining options of converting waste to energy as well, trying to capture the gas from the
digesters. We're looking at generation numbers now and how we could expand on getting more
customers to be able to generate more gases and more biosolids that will allow us to do such
diversion. So we're working with that currently and with both the consultant and Sustainability
Partners, where they have a contract with the state. They are navigating that for us because
we're also looking at the closed landfill in Hilo with the possibility of capturing hydrogen to fuel
the buses at the transit facility. We are looking at the possibility of connecting the gas from the
wastewater to the gas that we generate from the landfill, and be able to pipe that and create
supply to the Mass Transit Agency. That would be great. So there's a lot of work behind the
scenes with our staff, the consultants, being worked on.
As far as Kealakehe WWTP is concerned, the Director said, we got the contract with R.M. Towill
to do the headworks, odor control, and are looking at assisting with the sand filter installation.
The sand filter installation is being scoped by another consultant. Staff are working with that as
well.
The challenge is, as you all know, because injection wells in the State of Hawai‘i now are
prohibited (without a permit) because of the County of Maui v. Hawai‘i Wildlife Fund decision.
So unless you go through certain calculations and prove to the state and the Department of
Health that you could utilize some of these injection wells, and you have to do the functional
equivalency test, you have to go through an analysis to make sure that your discharge does not
make it to the navigable waters of the United States.
That is also applicable to Kealakehe because we don't have a National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System permit for that site. So that potentially will open the door for an
enforcement order. And he anticipates the EPA probably will get us one. So that would be true
for other facilities with injection wells or facilities that doesn't have NPDES permits currently.
Chair Adams asked if one could get a permit by cleaning up the discharge to the injection wells.
Director Mansour said there are two challenges. You have to go through an NPDES permit
because the court assumes that just 2 percent could be making it to the navigable waters of the
United States. So you have to do your own calculations to be site specific. As far as cleaning the
water, that's not the issue because Department of Health does not currently have a nutrient
limit, a stringent limit, to the navigable waters of the United States. The State of California had
some, he doesn’t know if the State of Hawai‘i will eventually create their own nutrient removal
limitation. We could see the writing on the wall. If the state ends up adopting nutrient removal
limits, that's going to probably make it impossible to reach these type of limits, especially with
nitrogen and phosphorus and other nutrients, because certain treatment facilities cannot just
remove 100 percent. And the purpose for that? They want us to start finding ways for the reuse
of that water, which is better than just dumping it in the ocean. So you could have the option of
23
having good effluent with high nutrient numbers that we could use for ag purposes, or we
could go through $50 million to $60 million of additional funds just to clean the water, and yet
dispose of it to the ocean and kind of defeat the purpose. So our goal is to see if we could
capture our resource to become sustainable and put it back into the ag use and the energy
sector.
Vice Chair Gaffney asked about the chemistry in deriving hydrogen from either a wastewater
treatment plant or from a landfill. Can you briefly describe how you would extract hydrogen
from either of those places? He was 100 percent in support of that but didn’t understand the
technology required.
Director Mansour we are still looking at exploring the technology for gas generation. We
haven't got to the technology yet. First, we need to look at feasibility. So we're looking at the
amount of gas we generate. Once we think we have enough gas to accommodate whatever
technology exists, then we need to look at the dollar figure and see if it's feasible. So we're still
in the early stages of analysis first.
Vice Chair Gaffney asked if it involves converting methane to hydrogen.
Chair Adams said the bacteria eating the organics in the landfill or in a digester at a wastewater
treatment plant are converting the organics, the sugars and other carbohydrates into methane.
And then we would extract the hydrogen from the methane, the Director said.
The process may capture the gas itself on its own and produce electricity if the hydrogen
doesn't pan out. So the idea now is just looking at the feasibility. First, we need to confirm the
numbers. If the numbers don't add up, it becomes moot, the Director said.
b. What is the cost to the County for a resident to:
i. Dispose of solid waste and hazardous waste.
ii. Recycle materials accepted at Solid Waste Division facilities.
iii. Sewer and treat wastewater.
(Discussion postponed)
c. Status and timeline of the North Kona Sewage Pumping Station (Gaffney)
Director Mansour wanted to address one of the questions that the Vice Chair stated earlier in
the discussion 4 about the county and the North Kona Pumping Station in regard to the sewer.
The County is not holding anything. It’s the State Historic Preservation Division of the
Department of Land and Natural Resources holding our environmental assessment, and we
have no control over it. If DLNR could accelerate that process, we would appreciate that as well,
because you may have more leverage on that process to accelerate it. The County's hands are
4 See Page 2 of these minutes
24
tied. We've been trying to push it because we need to get that money and we need to get that
project constructed. But unfortunately, it's in the hands of other state departments.
Vice Chair Gaffney said he did not mean to imply that the County was holding it up. What he
said is that the County doesn't know when that pumping station will go online, and that's what
DLNR is stating as their reason for not wanting to fund it now. He has reached out, but basically,
he got the kind of response that you'd probably get if you reached out to the Planning
Department and asked them to move ahead more quickly. DLNR is the largest single agency in
the state, and their response is that SHPD is SHPD, they're over there. They're not us. So it's a
typical finger pointing thing. But the bottom line is that DLNR’s Division of Boating and Ocean
Recreation, which is the one that's deciding to put the system in, doesn't have any control over
SHPD, unfortunately. So he did reach out. He did ask if this is something they can do. The Vice
Chair needs to try to reach First Deputy Director Bob Masuda because it's really at the higher
level where they can push the buttons. So he hasn't given up on it. But the bottom line is that,
unfortunately, like everything with wastewater, there are three government bodies. There's the
federal side, at the EPA level, there's the state side at the DOH level, and now SHPD, and then
there's the County side. And too often we can't get where we want to get because they all have
issues and they're all standing in the way. So a point of frustration for everybody, he said.
d. Expected budget shortfalls and impacts in FY 22-23
If there's anything that EMC can do to help with priorities or to go beg for some more money, it
would be good to know, Chair Adams said. You don't have staff, you don't have budget. You are
going to be getting more money, and some good news from Council, it looks like, although that
isn't official until their vote next month. But are there some things that EMC should provide
input on?
Director Mansour noted that the budget review hearing for DEM was held in April. We were
given three additional engineering positions. And in addition, of course, we asked for more, but
we're hoping that they give us more as the May budget submittal comes through. We need the
staff, so we asked for it. We got some during the March budget, and hopefully we get more. As
far as the money, the Mayor has done a great job also by going out and committing that
wastewater is one of his top priorities, and we got the approval on that 22-23 CIP budget as
well. So now the is pressure on us to start staffing up to deliver on that promise.
c. Solid Waste Division Projects and Updates
(No discussion)
d. Wastewater Division Projects and Updates
a. Pretreatment code draft proposal status
Director Mansour said that DEM’s Deputy Corporation Counsel was working with the
Department of Health. Once we navigate through that, then she instructed us we could share it
with you, he said.
25
8. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
a. Follow up on action items determined today.
Chair Adams said if you want something on the agenda, tell her or the Secretary so that we get
it on there. We'll be covering the findings for the hearing, and she will carry over the new
business that was not covered today, and maybe a couple of other items. The Chair will be
sending some links and a copy of what she read through during the meeting.
b. Other (Commissioners may suggest items they would like placed on the next
agenda.)
(No discussion)
9. ANNOUNCEMENTS
The next meeting is scheduled for May 25, 2022, via Zoom and at the Puna Conference
Room, Hawai‘i County Building, 25 Aupuni Street, Hilo. Please contact the Department
of Environmental Management or monitor the website for updates.
(No discussion)
10. CONTESTED CASE HEARING
Kai Ala Partners LLC appeal of the Director’s decision to bill two wastewater accounts
for TMK (3) 7-5-019:018 and (3) 7-5-019:026.5
NOTE: See Volume II.
11. ADJOURNMENT
MOTION, SECOND, AND VOTE: Commissioner Robinson made a motion, to which
Commissioner Olson seconded, to adjourn. Ayes 8 (Adams, Burns, Cardwell, Fulton, Gaffney,
McIntosh, Olson, Robinson). Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Peter Sur, Secretary
5 Agenda 10 – Appellant and Appellee briefs and exhibits –
http://records.hawaiicounty.gov/weblink/Browse.aspx?dbid=1&startid=115747