HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-25-2022 ACK LTR TO FAY SAKATA (PETITION_PL-CCH-2022-007_PL-SPP-2022-015) Mitchell D.Roth d$•'s'f f„i!►? Zendo Kern
Mayor �digf Director
Lee E.Lord Jeffrey W.Darrow
Managing Director :� * Deputy Director
T�OF.HIiI
West Hawaii Office East Hawaii Office
74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy • • 101 Pauahi Street,Suite 3
Kailua-Kona,Hawaii 96740 County of Hawaii Hilo,Hawaii 96720
Phone(808)323-4770 Phone(808)961-8288
Fax(808)327-3563 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax(808)961-8742
August 25, 2022
Fay Sakata
1617 Mele Manu Street
Hilo, HI 96720
Dear Fay Sakata:
Special Permit Application No. PL-SPP-2022-000015
Applicant: Randy Kunimoto
Subject: Acknowledgment of Petition for Standing in a Contested Case Hearing
(PL-CCH-2022-000007)
Tax Map Key: (3) 2-5-061:058, South Hilo, Hawaii
This is to acknowledge receipt on August 24, 2022, of the Petition for Standing in a
Contested Case Hearing that you filed with the Planning Department. The petition will be
forwarded to the Windward Planning Commission for their consideration.
The hearing on this matter has been tentatively scheduled for September 1, 2022, at 9:00 a.m.
Your presence or the presence of your representative will be required at the hearing to
respond to questions that the Windward Planning Commission may have regarding the
petition for standing.
Please refer to Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure, Rule 4 (Contested
Case Hearing Procedure) for information about the contested case process. The rules can be
found on the Planning Department website at:
https://www.planning.hawaiicounly.g v/about-us/boards-committees/planning-commission-
applications
www.planning.hawaiicounty.gov Hawaii County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer planning cghawaiicounty.gov
Fay Sakata
August 25, 2022
Page 2
If you have any questions,please feel free to contact Jessica Andrews at (808) 961-8155.
Sincerely,
Zgewo eMe
Zendo Kern(Aug 26,2022 09:53 HST)
ZENDO KERN
Planning Director
JMA:jaa
\\coh01\planning\public\wpwin60\Jessica\Letters\S akata-PL-SPP-2022-000015-AckReceiptForContestedCasePetition.doe
cc w/copy of petition: Windward Planning Commission via e-mail
Malia Hall, Esq., Deputy Corporation Counsel via e-mail
Jean Campbell, Esq., Deputy Corporation Counsel via e-mail
Randy Kunimoto via e-mail
PETITION FOR STANDING IN A CONTESTED CASE HEARING
(Page I of 2)
NAME: FAY SAKATA
ADDRESS: 1617 Mele Manu Street
Hilo, HI 96720
PHONE NO.: (808) 935-7337 (808) 936-7133
APPLICANT/
DOCKET NO.: RANDY KUNI140TO / PL—SPP-2022-000015
A. Is your interest in this matter clearly distinguishable from that of the general public'?
Yes % No
If the answer is "yes", please explain:
My husband and I live next door to the Applicant's property where he
conducts his commercial tennis operation. Please see attached
letter for further explanation of our interest in this matter.
If the answer is "no",please explain how the proposed action will nevertheless cause you
actual or threatened inj ury:
B. Are you a goverment agency whose jurisdiction includes the land involved in the
subject request?
Yes No X
If the answer is "yes", please explain the nature of the agency's jurisdiction:
C. Do you lawfully reside on or have some property interest in the land involved in the
subject request?
Yes No %
If the answer is "yes", please explain:
Appendix A
PETITION FOR STANDING IN A CONTESTED CASE HEARING
(Page 2 of 2)
D. Are you a person or persons descended from native Hawaiians who inhabited the
Hawaiian Islands prior to 1778, who practiced those rights which were customarily and
traditionally exercised for subsistence, cultural, or reli;.>.ious purposes?
Yes No
If the answer is "yes", please submit any genealogical evidence and historical evidence
showin�.t the exercise of those rights to support your statement:
P itioner's Signature
STATE OF HAWAII )
SS.
COUNTY OF HAWAII )
On this 24th day of August , 20 22 , before me personally appeared
Fay Sakata to me known to be the person described in and who executed
the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he executed the sante as his free act and POc
NOTARY
* PUBLIC
Nota blit, State of Hawaii No. 17-214
May 14 2025 q
My commission expires: y 6F
My
POC
Uoc. Date: ya �f I'a•�es�-_- 0C',�•.
Notary Name ro :gym (:ircutt NOTARY
Doc. Description C3'1 — PUBLIC
&VtnCkJ-1,) in Gi = * i * =
No. 17-214 A1.Pcn�x.A
Nota y gnature D re '�.;9 OF HP�P'�,,
NOTARY CERTIFICATION
STEVEN AND FAY SAKATA
1617 Mele Manu Street
Hilo, HI 96720
August 24, 2022
County of Hawaii Planning Department
101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3
Hilo,HI 96720
Re: Petition For Standing In A Contested Case Hearing
Windward Planning Commission Public Hearing: September 1,2022,9:00 a.m.
New Business Agenda Item No. 3
Application for Special Permit(PL-SPP-000015)
Applicant: Randy Kunimoto
Affected Property: 1625 Mele Manu Street, Hilo, TMK 3rd/2-5-061:058
Dear Planning Department and Windward Planning Commission:
This letter is submitted in support of our August 24, 2022 Petition For Standing In A
Contested Case Hearing and to provide further explanation of our clearly distinguishable interest in
this matter from that of the general public.
We have lived at the top of Mele Manu Street since 1996 when we built our home in what
was then,and was for several years thereafter, a quiet,private, safe, low-traffic subdivision. After
Randy purchased his lot just above ours and built his residence in 2005, he installed a tennis court
and thereafter began to operate a compensated tennis lesson business which became a full-time
enterprise. The negative impact of his commercial tennis operation upon us and our neighborhood
was soon apparent,with a major increase in daily traffic driving up and down our street,often at high
speeds,with tennis lessons and play occurring seven days a week,from 7:00 a.m.to after 9:00 p.m.,
and loud noise from the many players and the sounds of tennis activities reaching our home and the
homes of other neighbors all day long and into the late evening.
Two close-up aerial photos are attached. The first photo shows Randy's property,his tennis
facility,his large parking area for his patrons,and two neighboring houses to the right. The second
photo shows our house which is just below Randy's property. This photo also shows our driveway
where it enters the cul de sac. Randy's patrons drive right in front of our driveway entrance when
arriving and leaving his property. This often requires us to stop abruptly when leaving our driveway
to avoid a collision,and multiple cars are often backed in the cul de sac waiting to drop off and pick
up players during heavy tennis lesson traffic.
Even though Randy's daily tennis activities and the increased traffic were having a huge,
negative impact upon us and our neighborhood soon after he began operations 17 years ago, early
on we were reluctant to complain and for quite some time we did not say anything to him, hoping
that perhaps his tennis operation would slow down and the problems would abate. This was due in
part because we wanted to be cordial, good neighbors, and also because we knew Randy and his
family from before he became our neighbor, as we are also a tennis family and have always loved
the sport. Our kids grew up in the Hilo Junior Tennis Club, we ran Sanctioned Junior Tennis
Tournaments and Tournament Fundraisers with Randy's parents, we chaperoned junior tennis
players from our club and took them to neighbor islands for tournaments,and our youngest daughter
took lessons from Randy.
However,when the situation did not change,his hours of operation remained the same,his
clientele increased in number,the daily tennis noise from his property did not abate,the traffic did
not decrease,and we(and several other neighbors)had a number of instances while walking on the
side of the street of nearly being hit by cars driven by his tennis patrons, we told Randy well over
10 years ago of our concerns and asked him to reduce his hours of operation,reduce the noise, and
advise his patrons to drive more carefully on our street. Randy responded by promising to reduce
his hours (which he did for a brief period but returned to his regular hours of operation soon
thereafter) and that he would address the traffic and speeding problems caused by his customers.
Despite our requests,the high level of traffic has remained constant,and the tennis activities,noise,
and long hours of operation have remained the same. To make matters worse,a couple of years ago
Randy began to also allow pickle ball to be played at his facility, which has further increased the
number of people coming to his facility, is much louder than tennis, and has increased the level of
noise that we now hear coming from his property.
Over the past decade or more,we have repeated our concerns to him on numerous occasions,
and each time he has made the same hollow promises to take actions to reduce the noise,reduce his
hours of operation, and address the ongoing traffic and safety problems, with no changes ever
occurring. The traffic issue prompted us and other neighbors, for the safety of our neighborhood,
to seek the installation of speed humps on Mele Manu Street, which the County installed several
years ago, something that would not have been necessary but for Randy's commercial tennis
operation. Even with these speed humps,cars traveling to and from Randy's property still speed up
and down our street. Other neighbors have also asked Randy to alter his operation to reduce noise,
hours of operation and traffic problems and have been met with same non-response, and some
neighbors have told us that they feel intimidated and have therefore not lodged complaints with him,
although they feel his operation has a negative impact upon their property ownership rights as well.
The ongoing interference with our quiet use and enjoyment of our property, the ongoing
traffic safety concerns,and Randy's years-long refusal to abide by his numerous promises to make
changes in his tennis facility operation, prompted us to file a zoning complaint of unpermitted
commercial activity with the Planning Department in November,2020. This complaint resulted in
the County's issuance of a Warning Letter to Randy dated November 10, 2021 which included a
cease and desist order,an instruction to allow a property inspection,and a requirement to apply for
a Special Permit before he could resume operating his commercial tennis operation at his residence.
Upon inspection of Randy's property,the County found two unpermitted structures, ordered them
to be removed, and granted his request to resume his tennis business during the Special Permit
process,with limited hours of operation between 9:00 a.m.and 5:00 p.m.,Monday through Saturday.
The County further stated that should the Special Permit Application be denied, Randy must
immediately cease his tennis operation on his property.
Randy's Application for Special Permit seeks to resume his commercial tennis operation
seven days a week, from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., essentially seeking to return to the very same
activities that have caused a pervasive, negative impact upon the quiet use and enjoyment of our
property for the past 17 years,with the only difference being no tennis activities in the evening after
6:00 p.m. While he makes no mention in his Application of the availability of alternative sites for
operating his tennis enterprise,there are numerous public tennis and pickle ball courts in Hilo where
other tennis coaches conduct their lessons, and there are certainly available properties in non-
residential areas that could be acquired or rented to operate his tennis business. Denying his
Application will not prevent Randy from continuing to provide the Hilo tennis community with his
tennis expertise and services as his Application implies; it will simply require him to do so at a site
that will not interfere with our residential property rights and the rights of other neighbors similarly
impacted, something that the vast majority of commercial enterprises are required to do.
Accordingly, we ask that the Commission find that our interest in this matter is clearly
distinguishable from that of the general public and grant the Petition For Standing In A Contested
Case Hearing. Thank you.
Steven akata
&Q�C�
Fay Sakata
ƒy} /
m
-
.
-
/\
- \
�
40 e
-
a ` a _ • .
-
^
i�� 4' "" .f• .tit..��k'i'�''_•�-�"•'��` _�_� �' - - ry.-� l.=•�"-•" ,}.- -Sri -
-. .`.t''��" "+"��t 7',',r� � y*.�'y��' .}�_i ��'`r' r hi' g ff^�+�f j ;Y?��`'�'•�"xr.?{�y, 7 wf'�,K � ;• '
- �F,,�j'� ,5{��if- +tip __ - i 4. v�y�z a`• r+. 3
oto
ansen
Lowilo
1
san
� R
pr
• ±