HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-05-04 TPITTULO
PLANNING COMMISSION
COUNTY OF HAWAII
HEARING TRANSCRIPT
MAY 4, 2007
A regularly advertised hearing on the application of
JUSTIN PITTULLO AND NANCY
was called to order at2:45 p.m. in the County of Hawaii, Aupuni
HAMADA (REZ 07-000061)
Center Conference Room, 101 Pauahi Street, Hilo, Hawaii, with Chairman William Graham
presiding.
PRESENT:William GrahamABSENT & EXCUSED: Andrew Iwashita
C. Kimo Alameda
Takashi Domingo
ReneSiracusa
Alvin Rho
Rodney Watanabe
Rell Woodward
Ivan Torigoe, Deputy Corporation Counsel
Christopher Yuen, Planning Director
Norman Hayashi, Planning Program Manager
Phyllis Fujimoto, Staff Planner
Jeff Darrow, Staff Planner
And approximately 9 people from the public in attendance
APPLICANTS: JUSTIN PITTULLO AND NANCY HAMADA (REZ 07-000061)
Change of Zone from Agricultural 1-acre (A-1a) to Neighborhood Commercial 20,000 square
feet (CN-20) for approximately 1.022 acres of land. The property is located on the south side of
Ponahawai Street approximately 950 feet east of the Komohana Street/Ponahawai Street
intersection, Ponahawai, South Hilo, Hawaii, TMK: 2-3-37: 11.
GRAHAM:Our next item of business in our New Business Agenda is a Change of
Zone application from Justin Pittullo and Nancy Hamada. This is from Ag -1a to Neighborhood
Commercial 20,000 square feet for approximately 1 acre. It is located on the south side of
Ponahawai Street, approximately 950 feet east of the Komohana Street/Ponahawai Street
intersection, in South Hilo, Hawaii. Jeff?
DARROW:Thank you, Mr. Chairman. If I can direct the Commissions attention to
the location map. Just for reference, this white line moving in a north-south direction is
Komohana Street. This white line moving in an east-west direction is Ponahawai Street. The
next two applications will be in the similar area. The application that were going to be working
on at this time is identified in red. The applicants, Justin Pittullo and Nancy Hamada, are
requestingaChangeofZonefromAgricultural1-acretoNeighborhoodCommercial20,000
square feet for 1.022 acres of land.
1EXHIBIT B
If I can direct your attention to the applicants plot plan submitted with the application, the
property is rectangular in shape. We have Ponahawai Street on the north side. There is an
existing 5,800-square foot dwelling on the property at this time thats being constructed. The
applicant is proposing to utilize this existing structure for medical offices as well as commercial
uses.
The condition to mention is Condition C. This is a condition requiring the applicants to extend
an 8-inch waterline along Ponahawai Street from the existing 12-inch waterline within
Komohana Street to connect to the existing 8-inch and 6-inch waterlines within Ponahawai Street
to obtain the 2,000 gallons per minute fire flow requirement. The applicant this morning has
submitted a revised version of this condition; and Ill refer to them to explain the revision.
The Planning Director is recommending that a favorable recommendation be forwarded to the
Hawaii County Council. Are there any questions?
GRAHAM:Thank you, Jeff. Commissioner Siracusa?
SIRACUSA:Yes. Is the way this map is oriented, is makai on the top and mauka on the
bottom?
DARROW:Correct,makaiwouldbeuponthisside,maukawouldbehere.Andthis
would be north and this south.
SIRACUSA:So its really we should be thinking upside down when were looking at
this.
DARROW:I guess so. Its similar to as you see the location map.
GRAHAM:Mr. Hayashi?
HAYASHI:Yes. As far as this particular site plan, this is the mauka side. This is
Ponahawai Street, so this would be makai. And this building is currently under construction. It
was originally signed off as a single family dwelling; and thats how its being constructed. The
applicant now intends to convert this particular building for commercial uses. They havent
indicated any other commercial buildings on the property.
ALAMEDA:Mr. Chair?
GRAHAM:Yes, Commissioner Alameda.
ALAMEDA:Just for point of reference, could you point out the Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter Day Saints.
HAYASHI:The church would be in this, lets see, if you look at this map here, this is
the subject property; and the church would be right here.
ALAMEDA:Okay, thank you.
2EXHIBIT B
GRAHAM:Thank you. Other questions from Commissioners? Mr. Yuen, I had a
question maybe you could help me with. Generally we act on rezoning applications with a lot of
attention paid to the General Plan, whether it conforms or not. And I think on these two
applications we have here this afternoon they both conform, so theres no fault to be found with
them in that regard. However, we do have sort of a substantial portion of green land here which,
you know, can be urbanized. And given the General Plan designation there are a lot of different
urbanizations possible. Like these two here we have today are different. So Im just thinking,
we do have individual property owners and individual property owners have their own plans that
they like and what they like to do with their property, but, you know, there is some way that
youd like the whole package to come up with some kind of conformity that sticks together and
works as a unit. Does the Planning Department really have any way to deal with that concern?
Could you just speak to that, please.
YUEN:We dont have a master plan for Ponahawai Street. And the difficulty
withPonahawaiStreetisthatitwassubdividedintoone-acrelots.Sothismeansthattheyhavea
variety of owners, some of whom see their future as a multi-family, and some see it as a
commercial; and thats what youre seeing. To give you a contrary example of trying to send a
direction in the General Plan, in the General Plan revisions last time, you know, Waiakea House
Lots is where a similar thing happened in a way because you took, there was an area that was
previously Low Density Urban in the General Plan and then put into Medium Density. All right?
And then it opens the door for a lot of decisions which can be made by a particular landowner
and then decided on at the rezoning stage on a case-by-case basis like were doing here by the
Planning Commission and by the County Council. That was starting to feel a little haphazard in
the Waiakea House Lots; and so we proposed a text amendment to the General Plan which
suggested that Commercial rezonings should take place along certain streets, Manono Street,
Lanikaula Street, which are the major streets for the movement of traffic and that along the side
streets like Laukapu Street, Hinano Street, the General Plan is encouraging Residential
rezonings. So you would have the Residential rezonings more on the interior. So thats an
example of trying to send a direction. But we havent done that for Ponahawai Street, and yes
we have been just seeing a series of applications.
And if these are passed and they developed according to the application, what youre going to
see are a mixed group of some commercial and typically office type buildings and a few
relatively small apartment buildings. Its unfortunate, and to tell you the truth, the property was
subdivided according to an Ag-1 zoning. There was a tentative subdivision approval when we
came in, my administration came into the Planning Department. I knew this was exactly what
was going to happen, but it did have tentative subdivision approval and was approved with the
one-acre lots. And when I say thats whats going to happen, that once you start, you know, its
a lot easier to master plan an area or to have a coordinated development of an area when you
have one owner who has 5, 10, 15, 20 acres and they can create something. And typically from
both a planning and an aesthetic point of view youll have a better area when you have an area
where somebody owns 10 acres and they come in and -. If we had one owner come in with 10
acres wed probably wind up a more, almost certainly will wind up with a better plan and more
coordinated area; but thats simply not what we have.
GRAHAM:Yeah, thank you. It seems to me like maybe this is sort of a situation
where the community development plan process can be helpful if the community wants to push a
3EXHIBIT B
particular direction for some area like this. All right, any further questions for Jeff before the
applicant comes forward? All right, could we have the applicant, please.
ZELKO:Good morning, Commissioners. Jennifer Zelko on behalf of -.
GRAHAM:Id like to swear you in first if I could. Could you all raise your right
hands. And do you swear or affirm to tell the truth before the Planning Commission today on
this matter?
TESTIFIERS:Yes. I do.
GRAHAM:Thank you. And go right ahead and give your name and address.
ZELKO:Yes. Good morning, Jennifer Zelko on behalf of the applicant, Justin
Pittullo.Myaddressis121WaianuenueAvenue,Hilo,Hawaii96720.
PITTULLO:Goodafternoon.JustinPittullo,POBox67,Hilo,Hawaii96721.
LEELOY:Aloha,goodafternoon,SueLeeLoy.Mailingaddress121Waianuenue
Avenue, Hilo.
GRAHAM:Thank you, all. And I guess at this point we invite you to make whatever
presentation youd like to make to the Commission about your application and your project.
ZELKO:Sure. After reviewing the conditions for approval, the one issue was
Condition C, it has to do with the water. If you look at how its written theres a requirement for
this second 8-inch waterline along Ponahawai Street from the existing 12-inch waterline within
Komohana Street, and connect to the existing 8-inch and 6-inch waterlines within Ponahawai
Street to obtain this 2,000 gpm. And the way that DWS had originally written the agency
comment to us, there was this other alternative provision if the Fire Department would allow for
that. And in some of our informal discussion with the Fire Department there are other
alternatives, such as an automatic sprinkler system; and so thats what we were proposing. And
thats why the language that were proposing is that there are other alternatives, and if the Fire
Department would be okay with that wed like to do that.
GRAHAM:All right, thank you. So, Jeff, do you have any comment on that or -?
DARROW:I was just looking at the Department of Water Supply comment letter,
Exhibit 3, and the last sentence on No. 3 appears to be what the applicant is referring to.
GRAHAM:So in that regard I think the issue before us is maybe the applicant would
prefer we dont be so specific on Item C and that if the water can meet what the Fire Department
needs they could be handle in other ways, is what youd prefer?
ZELKO:That is correct.
GRAHAM:All right. Maybe we can read the Water Departments letter ourselves
here for just a second.
4EXHIBIT B
HAYASHI:Mr. Chair?
GRAHAM:Yes, Mr. Hayashi.
HAYASHI:For clarification purposes of this proposed condition, may I ask the
applicant as to what is meant by futurecommercial use? Does that also include the existing
Single-Family dwelling that would be converted to Commercial use or it does not include that
particular building?
ZELKO:No, it does not include the building that is already there. It would be for
future buildings.
HAYASHI:So its future buildings?
ZELKO:If there was ever future development on there, then the requirement, it
wouldbeconditionedonthat.
HAYASHI:IfthatisthecasethenIdontthinkthePlanningDirectorwouldbeableto
support that particular change. If perhaps the word future was deleted, then perhaps that could
meet the intent of what we had proposed.
ZELKO:Okay. I think one of the issues is the certificate of occupancy for the
building that is already there, I mean conditioning it on that.
HAYASHI:Yes. But in order to use the particular building -. You had a certificate of
occupancy for a single family dwelling. But if you were to convert that to commercial use as the
applicant intended to do, then they would have to come in for plan approval, that sort of thing, to
convert that particular building from a single-family dwelling to a commercial building. And at
that time when all of the requirements are completed then a certificate of occupancy would be
issued for that new commercial use.
ZELKO:In looking at one of the changes of zone ordinance for right down the
road, which was Matsuno, I dont know Sue if you want to point it out on the map up there, they
were doing a change of zone on a much larger parcel than we were doing to CN-20. And the
condition wasnt as extensive as the one we were seeing for this; and that was our concern.
GRAHAM:Mr. Yuen?
YUEN:Just to follow-up on what Mr. Hayashi is saying, youre trying to exempt
the existing building from fire flow or fire protection requirements so that you can have
commercial use on the existing building?
ZELKO:Well, one of the things, I guess the issue is if it isnt so specific we would
be okay with it. It was a very extensive requirement for a 5800-square foot office building. And
we were saying because it was so specific you had to do the second line from Komohana all the
way down. Thats about 400 feet, I believe. And if it wasnt so specific and we could go back to
5EXHIBIT B
the Fire Department and ask for an allowance to do maybe the automatic sprinkler system, then I
believe we would be okay with that on the existing building, would be fine.
YUEN:Yeah, I think wed be willing to have a condition that if you meet the Fire
Departments requirements for fire protection on any commercial building including the existing
building we could modify the condition. But the question that Mr. Hayashi was asking you and
that I just asked you again was, it sounded like you were trying to avoid those requirements on
the existing building.
ZELKO:No. We certainly want to do what the Fire Department requires. It was
just the specifics of this second 8-inch waterline, if we could just put the language in there that
says we will follow what the Fire Department says if theres another alternative, since thats
what DWS had said in their letter, their agency comment, that there may be other alternatives.
HAYASHI:Iguesstheconcernthatwehaveisthewordfuture.Andasindicated
earlier when I asked you the question, your intent was to not have the existing structure which
would be converted to a commercial establishment or commercial use not comply with this
particular condition. Or did I misunderstand your response?
ZELKO:Yes. Because I think our main concern was the specifics of that second 8-
inch waterline since we were only talking about one building and were not doing a big
apartment building or anything like that in the area. So as long as it wasnt specific were okay
with doing it, were okay. We would like, I mean were going to follow the Fire Department.
HAYASHI:Yes, I understand that portion. The concern we have is the word future.
And if youre willing to take out the word future then perhaps we can agree with what youre
proposing and give you that other alternative that youre seeking.
ZELKO:Okay, yes, I understand that. (Discussion off the record with applicant.)
Im sorry, Commissioners.
GRAHAM:Yeah, its all right. Go right ahead.
PITTULLO:Hello?
GRAHAM:Yes, sir.
PITTULLO:Basic question -. We want to do everything up to Code as far as the Fire
Inspector said. And just the occupancy of the building, Ive already done -. It started as a single-
family residence for my family, my mom, and my wife and child. And I planned to convert it,
you know, to use it for office space. Im a farmer, Im also a builder. So I guess the main
question for me is were about two to three weeks away from getting it finalized. Is this going to
hang up the final on the house where we can have occupancy just for my family?
GRAHAM:I think Mr. Hayashi can respond.
HAYASHI:Yeah, if youre going to be using that particular building as a single-
family dwelling then sure you can get your occupancy. But once you intend to convert that to a
6EXHIBIT B
commercial establishment or commercial use, then youve got to go through another process,
you would have go through another certificate of occupancy process.
PITTULLO:But it wouldnt stop the final for the single-family residence?
HAYASHI:Notifyou intend to use the property for single-family purposes.
PITTULLO:So as long as were using it for single-family residence purposeswe can
have the final on the existing structure, and the land itself can get rezoned to CN-20? Is that
accurate?
HAYASHI:Yeah.
PITTULLO:Okay, so I have no problem with that. Just as long as the wording says
thatiftheFireChief,FireInspectorokaysitandIcangetthefinalonthesingle-familyresidency
and not use it for commercial space until the appropriate time, thats fine.
YUEN:Well work on something that says that. But you have to understand that
you will get a final for your home as a home; and you will not be able to rent out office spaces
until you get a new building permit, plan approval, and certificate of occupancy.
ZELKO:Right. I think the main concern was getting the certificate of occupancy at
this time since it is going to be used as a residence for right now.
GRAHAM:Could you reread what your proposed condition is without the word future
for our benefit?
ZELKO:Sure. This is Condition C, In accordance with the Department of Water
Supplys Standards, the applicants shall extend a second 8-inch waterline along Ponahawai
Street from the existing 12-inch waterline within Komohana Street to obtain the 2,000 gpm fire
flow requirement or any alternative approved by the Fire Department prior to the receipt of a
Certificate of Occupancy. And maybe if its clear that he would be allowed to get that for a
single family dwelling, at least for now since hes only three weeks away.
GRAHAM:Jeff?
DARROW:Im sorry, in that description you just read, you left out for any
commercial use. You wanted to take that out as well? I believe all that theyre asking for is the
word future deleted.
ZELKO:Thats correct.
DARROW:So you want the remainder to stay in?
ZELKO:Yes. In fact, do you want me to read that again?
DARROW:No, no. Its just that that was -.
7EXHIBIT B
ZELKO:Okay, okay.
GRAHAM:We dont have any public testifier signed up yet on this. If anybody here
wants to speak to this application, please come over and sign in. Yes, Commissioner Siracusa?
SIRACUSA:At our last Hilo meeting we took up an application for the AOAO
Professional Building and the big issue there was parking, as you will recall. Now Im looking
at this and he wants to put a medical office space in there. And theres only one place that
parking is mentioned at all and thats in Condition D which just refers very briefly to Plans shall
identify proposed structure(s), fire protection measures, access roadway, driveway and parking
stalls. It doesnt say anything about how many parking stalls or any other information. And
Im wondering why it was so brief here when we had in previous applications weve had so
much more on parking, including, you know, a site plan showing where the proposed parking
spaces were and how many there would be for the square footage and the, what is it, for 300
squarefeetandallofthat.SoIwaswonderingifeitherJeffortheDirectorcouldexplaintome
why thats not really addressed here.
GRAHAM:Jeff?
DARROW:Thank you, Mr. Chairman. A standard condition that we have in most
rezonings, if not all, has to do with the applicants complying with construction or completion
timelines; and prior to that they have to submit plans for plan approval. Plan approval is a very
detailed comprehensive review of the project in light of the Zoning Code requirements, and more
specifically in regards to parking, the amount of parking that would be required for that
particular development. It also includes fire protection measures, access, driveway and parking
stalls, as well as landscaping. So to be able to actually identify how many parking stalls are to be
proposed for the particular development is, I would say, premature until they submit plans and
they can actually identify how much commercial activity or how much floor space, and identifies
the amount of parking that will ultimately be needed for the project.
SIRACUSA:Follow-up, please?
GRAHAM:Yes, Commissioner Siracusa.
SIRACUSA:In the case where someone is preparing to build I can see where that
would be the case. But here you have the existing building already so you know how much floor
space there is. What Im wondering is, and I dont know how well to scale that map is, is there
sufficient space on the parcel to accommodate the parking that would be allowed at, what is it,
one space per 300 square feet or whatever it is? Because you already have that figure, you
already have the building in place. I just want to make sure that the parcel can accommodate the
legal amount of parking.
GRAHAM:Jeff?
DARROW:Yeah, in this particular application because theres one acre of land theres
quite a bit of amount of area for parking, more so than if it was just a 20,000-square foot lot.
GRAHAM:Commissioner Alameda?
8EXHIBIT B
ALAMEDA:Thank you, Mr. Chair. Im just curious, because youre not planningto
have commercial usage currently what made you come now forthis variance?
PITTULLO:Well, again, just to be frank with the Commissioners here, if you go up
Ponahawai Street, its sign every other lot. So, you know, Im driving, building, saying what are
all these signs about and, you know, Im not the smartest guy in the world but, I mean, I can
read. So, you know, that was basically the impetus for it, you know.
GRAHAM:Any other questions from Commissioners? Yes, Commissioner Rho?
RHO:On Exhibit 4, I guess, are pictures, and Exhibit 9. So I wanted to know
whats really around this property to the sides and to the rear and across the street.
PITTULLO:Well,theChurchofLatterDaySaints,likewasalreadydetailed,ismakai
and on the opposite side of the street. That really is the only structure in that area that is
noteworthy. If you go further down Ponahawai youre going to come to Kinoole Street and the
cemetery. Once you pass the cemetery theres the church, theres the structure that I built, and
thats really it until you get to the medical facilities. So I dont know if that answers your
question, but really behind theres not much and on the sides theres not much going on.
RHO:On Exhibit 4 at the top theres a picture of a structure. Whats that?
PITTULLO:Thats the medical facilities next to Komohana.
RHO:And is the church that youre talking about on the bottom?
PITTULLO:Yeah, that would be makai approximately 800 to 1000 feet.
RHO:And then on Exhibit 2, its like to the rear of your property theres
Komohana Heights. Whats -?
PITTULLO: Yeah, to the rear of my property is all jungle bamboo. You cant see any
houses from the rear of the property. But, yes, that is correct, Komohana Heights is noted behind
it.
RHO:So, if your property was a neighboring property, I guess what I really want
to know is wheres the boundary for Komohana Heights in relationship to your property or any
other properties that lie along the way on Ponahawai?
PITTULLO:I dont know. Im not familiar with the metes and bounds for Komohana
Heights. Do we have that? I can tell you that if youre looking from the back of my subject
property you dont see anything but jungle, or you dont see any houses or anything else
RHO:And do you know what Komohna Heights -? Okay, I got it. Theres a
map, on the orange -.
GRAHAM:All right, thank you. Anything else from the Commissioners?
9EXHIBIT B
ALAMEDA:One more.
GRAHAM:Commissioner Alameda?
ALAMEDA:I asked you earlier, made sense to me your answer about why youre
coming now. Cause I do too, I pass there as well and we attend that church, and I see a lot of
signs as well. But, so theres a commitment here for five years. Are you willing to meet that?
PITTULLO:Yes, I am. Like I have a farm, a 10-acre farm, and one of the things I do is
I go to the farmers market in Hilo and Im paying upwards of $200 to $240 every week just for
the rental spaces there. So I would like to, you know, within the five-year time period submit a
really nice plan that shows the parking and it shows everything and maybe have like a fruits and
vegetable stand or outlet for vegetables grown on my property as well as my farm in Opihikao.
AndthatssomethingyoucantdowiththeAG-1zoning,whichwasoneoftheearlyonthings
that got me into this. I said, okay, if I plant and harvest here I can only sell whats grown on this
property. Well, I have a 10-acre farm in Opihikao and I pay $240 a week to go to the farmers
markets. So why cant I sell my vegetable and fruits from my other farm? The zoning says I
cant. So without this, I guess, I can apply for a special permit or do something else; but Im
really stuck with going to the farmers market.
On a side note the owner down there, Keith, I dont know if you know him, theyre going to do
this whole renovation; and theyre going to shut down half of the farmers market for a substantial
period of time, and then the other half, so all of those vendors are going to be misplaced.
GRAHAM:Well, we still dont have any public testimony so I guess we can formally
close our questioning period, but you all can stay right there. But were going to just discuss
amongst each other, I guess right now, where we go with this. Commissioner Alameda?
ALAMEDA:Im ready to make a motion.
GRAHAM:Certainly. Wait a minute. Commissioner Watanabe.
WATANABE:I have a question. You mentioned about, you know, without the zoning
you cant sell agricultural products that you grow in Opihikao. I think Im on the right one, but
doesnt this say medical?
PITTULLO:Yes. The Commissioner was asking about my intent in the early stages.
He was trying to get my mindset as to why I applied and all in the first place. And I was just
elaborating on my first answer about why it got to this point. But theres a lot of property there
and obviously there are different needs in the community. One of them is medical facilities and
another one is a place where people can sell their fruits and vegetables.
GRAHAM:Commissioner Alameda?
ALAMEDA:Thank you, Mr. Chair. I move that a favorable recommendation be
forwarded to the County Council on the application for a change of zone, Docket No. Rezoning
07-000061 based on the Planning Directors recommendation and proposed conditions.
10EXHIBIT B
WATANABE:Second.
GRAHAM:And, Commissioner Alameda, we did have a little change to this
Condition C with regard to meeting the fire requirements. You wanted to go with that change or
want clarification from Jeff?
ALAMEDA:No. I understand the change; and Id like to go with that change as part of
the motion. Do you need to rewrite or, go ahead.
GRAHAM:Hold a second.
ALAMEDA:Okay.
GRAHAM:Mr.Yuen?
YUEN:Yeah,Ithinkweneedtorewriteit;andIverewrittensomething.
ALAMEDA:Okay,canIheartheDirectorslanguage.
YUEN:ItwouldbeinaccordancewiththeDepartmentofWaterSupplys
Standards, the applicants shall extend a second inch, okay, wait. Let me start again. Were
going to start with the beginning being the same. But for the sake of clarity Im going to start
reading the whole thing from the beginning and then Ill stop when we start to change it. Okay,
In accordance with the Department of Water Supplys Standards, the applicants shall extend a
second 8-inch waterline along Ponahawai Street from the existing 12-inch waterline within
Komohana Street to obtain the 2,000 GPM fire flow requirement and then this is new prior to
the establishment of uses not allowed under the A-1a zone. Okay? So they can do the things
that they could do under their current zoning without extending the waterline. All right, then
new sentence, and this is to cover what they just asked for, The applicant may have the
alternative of converting the dwelling currently under construction to commercial use without
extending the waterline, provided it meets all fire flow requirements of the Fire Department.
GRAHAM:Thank you, Mr. Yuen.
ALAMEDA:Just checking, is there anything about certificate of occupancy? Do we
need to mention that or is it implied?
GRAHAM:Do we need anything additional, Mr. Yuen?
YUEN:Let me look at that first.
GRAHAM:Okay.
YUEN:Well, to me its implied.
ALAMEDA:Mr. Chair, can I check with the applicant to see if that language is okay?
11EXHIBIT B
GRAHAM:Yes.
ZELKO:Yes, that language is fine.
GRAHAM:Thank you.
ALAMEDA:Okay. Mr. Chair, do I need to restate my motion and -? Or can I just
defer for the record to Mr. Yuens language?
GRAHAM:I think you can just go with Mr. Yuens language for Condition C.
ALAMEDA:Okay, so noted.
GRAHAM:And we did have a second, I believe. But I dont recall who that was. Do
wehaveasecondtoMr.Alamedasmotion?Commissioner-?
WATANABE:Illsecond.
GRAHAM:Okay.Sothemotionismadeandsecondedforafavorable
recommendation that it be sent to the County Council with the Directors suggested conditions of
approval and as modified Condition C. Any discussion on the motion? Jeff?
DARROW:Thank you. Mr. Chairman, with that I will take the roll call.
Commissioner Alameda?
ALAMEDA:Aye.
DARROW:Commissioner Siracusa?
SIRACUSA:Aye.
DARROW:Commissioner Domingo?
DOMINGO:Aye.
DARROW:Commissioner Iwashita?
NOMURA:Hes not here.
DARROW:Oh, excuse me. Commissioner Rho?
RHO:Aye.
DARROW:Commissioner Watanabe?
WATANABE:Aye.
DARROW:Commissioner Woodward?
12EXHIBIT B
WOODWARD:Aye.
DARROW:And Mr. Chairman?
GRAHAM:Aye.
DARROW:The motion passes seven to zero.
ZELKO:Thank you.
LEE LOY:Thank you.
PITTULLO:Thank you.
GRAHAM:You will receive written notice also.
The discussion ended at 3:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Sharon M. Nomura, East Hawaii Secretary
13EXHIBIT B