My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PL-SPP-2022-000016 P. and J. Tama Testimony 01.02.23
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2023
>
2023-01-06 Windward
>
Item #1 Robert J. Silber (PL-SPP-2022-000016)
>
PL-SPP-2022-000016 P. and J. Tama Testimony 01.02.23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/4/2023 6:56:26 AM
Creation date
1/4/2023 6:56:23 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Pedro Tama <br /> To: W PCtesti mono <br /> Subject: Special Permit Appl PL-SPP-2022-000016-Jan 6th hearing <br /> Date: Monday,January 2, 2023 8:22:51 PM <br /> Date: January 2, 2023 <br /> To: Hawai'i County Planning Department and Windward Planning Commission <br /> From: Neighbors of Special Permit Application PL-SPP-2022-000016 <br /> Re: Written Testimony for January 6th Planning Commission Meeting <br /> In October of 2022 1 and my wife submitted testimony in this case stating: "We <br /> support the Applicant's proposed project with some appropriate conditions." Now we <br /> have changed our mind. We oppose the application for a Special Permit and strongly <br /> request the Planning Commission to deny it. This case should go back to the Board of <br /> Appeals where it belongs. <br /> What has changed? For us, new information has come to light about the Applicant's <br /> past self-serving deceptions to both the County and his neighbors. And recent events <br /> have been equally disturbing so as to convince us the applicant cannot be trusted to <br /> keep agreements, no matter how many conditions the County imposes. <br /> Does the Planning Commission know that for his first subdivision for Lolia Place in <br /> 2014 he never posted visible signage on the Red Road, the closest public road, as <br /> legally required? Do they know that for his most recent subdivision, Kaulupomauka <br /> LLC, next to Lolia Place, he never posted visible signage on the Red Road, as legally <br /> required. And do they know, as they should, that for the first attempted hearing for <br /> this Special Permit in November he deliberately posted the required signage at his <br /> property at the end of private, gated, Lolia Place, 900 ft from the Red Road. Three in <br /> a row.. He has made concertd effort to suppress public awareness, knowledge and <br /> public comments — and therefore potential criticism — of his real estate developments <br /> and now Special Permit application There is so much the Planning Derpartment and <br /> Planning Commission don't know, and so much the neighbors do know about the <br /> proposed project. <br /> My wife was one of the original complainants in 2019. We watched in frustration and <br /> astonishment as the county granted numerous requests to delay his appeal over <br /> nearly three years. We did not move here to get involved in this kind of conflict, but <br /> we never antiipated a neighbor who could so easily pull the rug over the County's <br /> eyes, month after month after month, year after year. <br /> Now he is making another attempt with a whitewashed Application that never gets to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.