Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Environmental Review Record 2022-08-23-HA-FEA-Kaiaulu-O-Kapiolani-Housing-Development-1
DAVID Y. IGE GOVERNOR DENISE ISERI-MATSUBARA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM HAWAII HOUSING FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION 677 QUEEN STREET, SUITE 300 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 FAX: (808) 587-0600 IN REPLY REFER TO: 22:PECB/44 August 15, 2022 Ms. Mary Alice Evans, Director Office of Planning and Sustainable Development P.O. Box 2359 Honolulu, Hawaii 96804-2359 Dear Ms. Evans: Re: Final Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development South Kohala District, Hawaii Island TMK No. (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 The Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) hereby transmits the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact (FEA-FONSI) for publication in the next available edition of The Environmental Notice. HHFDC has reviewed the environmental study, comments received during the 30-day public review period, and the corresponding responses from the applicant. Based on the significance criteria in section 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules, HHFDC has determined that the proposed action will have no significant adverse effects on the environment. Submitted online is acompleted Publication Form, the FEA-FONSI in PDF, and an electronic copy of this letter. Simultaneous with this letter, we have submitted the summary ofthe action in a text file byelectronic mail to your office. If there are any questions, please contact Dean Watase, Housing Planning Manager, at (808) 587-0639. Sincerely, Denise Iseri-Matsubara Executive Director c: Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 1 From:webmaster@hawaii.gov Sent:Monday, August 15, 2022 3:29 PM To:DBEDT OPSD Environmental Review Program Subject:New online submission for The Environmental Notice Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Action Name Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Type of Document/Determination Final environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact (FEA-FONSI) HRS §343-5(a) Trigger(s) (1) Propose the use of state or county lands or the use of state or county funds Judicial district North Hilo, Hawaiʻi Tax Map Key(s) (TMK(s)) (3)2-4-025:048,053,080 Action type Applicant Other required permits and approvals Building & Grading Permits, Chapter 343, NPDES Discretionary consent required None Approving agency Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation Agency contact name Dean Watase Agency contact email (for info about the action) dean.k.watase@hawaii.gov Agency contact phone (808) 587-0639 Agency address 677 Queen Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 United States Map It Applicant A0705 Hilo, L.P. Applicant contact name 2 Grant Bigley Applicant contact email gbigley@uhcllc.net Applicant contact phone (714) 873-5568 Applicant address 2000 E Fourth Street, Suite 220 Santa Ana, California 92705 United States Map It Was this submittal prepared by a consultant? Yes Consultant Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Consultant contact name Rachel Okoji Consultant contact email rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com Consultant contact phone (808) 783-6840 Consultant address 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 United States Map It Action summary A0705 Hilo, L.P. is proposing to develop an affordable rental complex of 64 units, consisting of 32 two-bedroom units, an estimated 24 three-bedroom units, and an estimated 8 four-bedroom units in Hilo. The development will include a community center for resident use and 117 parking stalls. The objective of this project is to produce an affordable rental development, while utilizing the least amount of State of Hawaii resources. These apartments will target low income households earning 60 percent or less of the Area Median Income (AMI) for the County of Hawai‘i. These units will address the dire need for affordable rentals for the households in this income bracket, many of whom are at risk of becoming homeless due to the severe housing shortage. Reasons supporting determination Please see Section 7 and Appendix. Attached documents (signed agency letter & EA/EIS) Kaiaulu-O-Kapiolani-EA-FINAL-2022.pdf 2022-08-15-Kaiaulu-O-Kapiolani-FEA-FONSI-Transmittal-to-OPSD.pdf Shapefile The location map for this Final EA is the same as the location map for the associated Draft EA. Action location map Figure-1.zip Authorized individual Rachel Okoji Authorization 3 The above named authorized individual hereby certifies that he/she has the authority to make this submission. FINAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Proposed Housing Development Hilo, Hawaii TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, (3) 2-4-025:080 Applicant: A0705 Hilo, L.P. Approving Agency: Hawaii Housing Finance & Development Corporation & County of Hawaii, Office of Housing and Community Development August 2022 June 2021 FINAL DRAFT Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Proposed Housing Development Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, (3) 2-4-025:080 Prepared by: Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 Prepared for: A0705 Hilo, L.P. 2000 E. Fourth Street, Suite 220 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Applicant: A0705 Hilo, L.P. Approving Agency: Hawaii Housing Finance & Development Corporation 677 Queen Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 County of Hawaii, Office of Housing and Community Development 1990 Kinoʻole Street, Suite 102 Hilo, HI 96720-5293 August 2022 June 2021 Changes between the Final Environmental Assessment and the Draft Environmental Assessment are indicated as underlined. Changes between the Final Environmental Assessment and the Draft Environmental i Table of Contents Section 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ……………………………………………………..……1 1.1 Scope and Authority ……………………………………………………………………..…….1 1.2 Project Information ………………………………………………………………………..…...1 Section 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION …………………………………………………………………..…..7 2.1 Purpose and Need …………………………………………………………………………..….7 2.2 Project Description ………………………………………………………………………..…...7 2.3 Construction Time Frame and Estimated Project Construction Cost ……………………….…7 Section 3 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION ………………………………. 29 3.1 Alternative I: No Action Alternative …………………………………………………………29 3.2 Alternative II: The Proposed Action …………………………………………………………29 Section 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT …………………………………………………………….…..31 4.1 Physical Environment ………………………………………………………………………...31 4.1.1 Topography and Geology ………………………………………………………….31 4.1.2 Soils ………………………………………………………………………………..31 4.1.3 Natural Hazard ……………………………………………………………………..31 4.1.4 Flora and Fauna ……………………………………………………………………32 4.1.5 Wetlands …………………………………………………………………………...39 4.1.6 Water Resources …………………………………………………………………...39 Groundwater …………………………………………………………………….39 Surface Water …………………………………………………………………...40 4.1.7 Climate and Air Quality ……………………………………………………………40 4.1.8 Noise ……………………………………………………………………………….47 4.1.9 Solid Waste ………………………………………………………………………...48 4.1.10 Hazardous Waste …………………………………………………………………48 4.2 Social Environment …………………………………………………………………………..48 4.2.1 Land Use Considerations and Zoning ……………………………………………..48 4.2.2 Archaeological and Cultural Considerations ………………………………………49 4.2.3 Transportation ………. …………………………………………………………….50 Traffic and Circulation…………………………………………………………..50 Airports …………………………………………………………………………52 4.2.4 Social Factors and Community Identity …………………………………………5253 4.2.5 Recreational and Public Facilities ………………………………………………….53 4.2.6 Visual and Aesthetic Resources …….…………………………………………..5354 4.2.7 Infrastructure Systems and Utilities …………………………………………….5354 Section 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES …55 5.1 Physical Environment ………………………………………………………………………...56 5.1.1 Topography and Geology ………………………………………………………….56 5.1.2 Soils ………………………………………………………………………………..56 5.1.3 Natural Hazard ……………………………………………………………………..56 5.1.4 Flora and Fauna ……………………………………………………………………57 5.1.5 Wetlands …………………………….………….……………………………….5862 5.1.6 Water Resources …………….………………….……………………………….5863 5.1.7 Climate Air Quality …………………….……….………………………………5864 5.1.8 Noise …………………………………….…….………………………………...6064 5.1.9 Solid Waste ……………………………...………………………………………6065 5.1.10 Hazardous Waste ………………………………………………………………6165 5.2 Social Environment ………………………………………………………………………..6166 5.2.1 Land Use Considerations and Zoning …………………………………………..6166 ii 5.2.2 Archaeological and Cultural Considerations ……………………………………6166 5.2.3 Transportation ……… ………………………………………………………….6267 5.2.4 Social Factors and Community Identity …………………………………………6367 5.2.5 Recreational and Public Facilities ………………………………………………6368 5.2.6 Visual and Aesthetic Resources …………………………………………………6368 5.2.7 Infrastructure Systems and Utilities …………………………………………….6468 5.3 Cumulative Impacts ………………………………………………………………………..6469 Section 6 RELATIONSHIP TO PLANS, POLICIES, AND CONTROLS …………………………….6570 6.1 State and County Land Use Plans and Policies ……………………………………………6570 6.1.1 State Land Use …………………………………………………………………..6570 6.1.2 County Zoning …………………………………………………………………..6570 6.1.3 Hawaii State Plan ………………………………………………………………..6570 6.1.4 Hilo Community Development Plan ……………………………………………6772 6.2 Necessary Permits and Approvals …………………………………………………………6772 6.2.1 State of Hawaii ………………………………………………………………….6772 6.2.2 County of Hawaii ……………………………………………………………….6873 Section 7 FINDINGS AND REASONS SUPPORTING AGENCY DETERMINATION ……………6974 Section 8 REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………………………7378 Section 9 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED …………………………………….7782 List of Figures Figure 1: Site Location Map………………………………………………………………………...………3 Figure 2: TMK Map………………………………………………………………………………..………..5 Figure 3: Site Plan ………………………………………………………………………………..…………9 Figure 4: Building Type A Floor Plan …………………………………………………………………….11 Figure 5: Building Type A Elevations …………………………………………………………………….13 Figure 6: Building Type B Floor Plan ……………………………………………………………………..15 Figure 7: Building Type B Elevations ……………………………………………………………………..17 Figure 8: Building Type C Floor Plan ……………………………………………………………………..19 Figure 9: Building Type C Elevations ……………………………………………………………………..21 Figure 10: Building Type D Floor Plan ……………………………………………………………………23 Figure 11: Building Type D Elevations ……………………………………………………………………25 Figure 12: Community Center Floor Plan …………………………………………………………………27 Figure 13: Flood Insurance Rate Map ……………………………………………………………………..33 Figure 14: Lava Flow Hazard Zones ………………………………………………………………………35 Figure 15: NOAA Tsunami Zone Evacuation Map ……………………………………………………….37 Figure 16: Wetland Map …………………………………………………………………………………..41 Figure 17: Underground Control Injection Map …………………………………………………………..43 Figure 18: State Sea Level Rise Exposure Area Map ……………………………………………………..45 List of Tables Table 1: Typical Equipment Sound Levels ……………………………………………………4748 Table 2: LOS Summary Table Existing Conditions and Base Year 2021 ………..………………52 iii Appendices Appendix A Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-assisted Projects 24 CFR Part 58 Exhibit 1: Airport Hazards Exhibit 2: Coastal Barrier Resources Exhibit 3: Flood Insurance Exhibit 4: Clean Air Exhibit 5: Coastal Zone Management Exhibit 6: Contamination and Toxic Substances Exhibit 7: Endangered Species Exhibit 8: Explosive and Flammable Hazards Exhibit 9: Farmlands Protection Exhibit 10: Floodplain Management Exhibit 11: Historic Preservation Exhibit 12: Noise Abatement and Control Exhibit 13: Sole Source Aquifers/Safe Drinking Water Exhibit 14: Wetland Protection Exhibit 15: Environmental Justice Exhibit 16: Consultation Letters iv Acronyms and Abbreviations AAQS Ambient Air Quality Standards AIS Archaeological Inventory Survey AMI Area Median Income ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials Bgs Below ground surface CAA Clean Air Act CDBG Community Development Block Grant CDP Community Development Plan CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability 1980 CFR Code of Federal Regulations Cl- Chloride dBA decibel DBEDT Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism DOD Department of Defense EA Environmental Assessment EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. ERA Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC ESA Environmental Site Assessment Fo Degrees Fahrenheit FAA Federal Aviation Administration FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FIRM Flood Insurance Rate Map FONSI Finding of No Significant Impact gpd Gallons per day v HAR Hawaii Administrative Rules HDOH Hawaii Department of Health HEER HDOH Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response HELCO Hawaiian Electric Company HHFDC Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation HRHP Hawaii Register of Historic Places HRS Hawaii Revised Statutes HTF Housing Trust Fund LUC Land Use Commission LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFA No Further Action NRHP National Register of Historic Places Mg/L Milligrams per liter PCB Polychlorinated biphenyl PM Particulate Matter PV Photovoltaic PWS Public Water Supply SCS Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. SEL Sound Exposure Level SHPD Hawaii State Historic Preservation Division SO2 Sulfur Dioxide TIAR Traffic Impact Analysis Report TMK Tax Map Key UH University of Hawaii UIC Underground Injection Control Line vi USDA US Department of Agriculture USEPA US Environmental Protection Agency USGS US Department Geological Survey UST Underground Storage Tank ES-1 Executive Summary This Environmental Assessment (EA) was conducted to assess potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed affordable housing development on unimproved real property identified as Tax Map Keys (TMKs) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, and (3) 2-4-025:080 in Hilo, on the island of Hawaii. The EA was prepared to identify, document and address potential environmental impacts associated with the Proposed Action. The EA examines two alternatives, the Proposed Action, and the No Action Alternative. ● Alternative I – No Action Alternative ● Alternative II – The Proposed Action – 64-unit housing development on Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street in Hilo, Hawaii. This multi-family apartment development would provide affordable rental housing for low income households. The Office of the Governor of Hawaii, Hawaii State Legislature, and Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC) have identified a need for affordable housing in Hawaii. In support of the Proposed Action, the County of Hawaii will be granting funds for 25 Section 8 Project Based Vouchers for rent subsidy, and the County may grant approximately $12,800,000 $1,500,000 of CDBG, HOME and/or HTF funds in support of the project. The following potentially impacted environments were evaluated in this EA: ● Topography and Geology ● Soils ● Natural Hazard ● Flora and Fauna ● Water Resources ● Climate and Air Quality ● Noise ● Solid Wastes ● Land Use Considerations and Zoning ● Archaeological and Cultural Considerations ● Circulation and Traffic ● Social Factors and Community Identity ● Recreational and Public Facilities ● Visual and Aesthetic Resources ● Infrastructure Systems and Utilities Findings: ● A Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is anticipated determination has been made based on the environmental and social factors considered under the Proposed Action and the No-Action Alternative, as well as comments received on the Draft Environmental Assessment. ES-2 ● While potential impacts to Soil, Air Quality, Noise, and Circulation and Traffic are possible during construction, implementing best management practices would reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. ● Beneficial impacts to Land Use Considerations and Zoning are anticipated as they would address the necessity of additional affordable rental housing for lower income persons. ● Under Alternative I, the No Action Alternative, Land Use Considerations and Zoning would incur a negative impact as full use of the land will not be realized. Additional negative impacts are anticipated to Social Factors and Community Identity under Alternative I. If No Action is taken, lower income persons will not have the additional affordable housing units and support services available to them. 1 Section 1 Introduction and Summary 1.1 Scope and Authority This Environmental Assessment (EA) has been prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969; 24 Code of Federal regulations (CFR) Part 50 and Part 58 Environmental Review with the National Housing Trust Fund (HTF) Environmental Provisions at 24 CFR 93.301(f)(1); the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508) and pursuant to Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS); and associated Title 11 Chapter 200 Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR). The intent of the document is to ensure that systematic consideration is given to the environmental consequences of the Proposed Action. The Proposed Action is the construction of a new housing development on Hawaii Island, in Hilo Hawaii, Hawaii (Figure 1). A NEPA, 24 CFR Part 58 EA is required because the project has been allocated federal funds from the HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME), which is subsidized by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the County of Hilo, Department of Housing on Human Concerns, and also Community Development Block Grant funds. The HTF also requires a 24 CFR Part 50 and Part 58 review according to environmental provisions of 24 CFR 93.301(f)(1) for new construction, and when combining HTF and other HUD funds. An HRS Chapter 343 EA is also required due to the award of state funds from the Rental Housing Revolving Fund, which is administered by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation (HHFDC). 1.2 Project Information Project Name: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Proposed Housing Development Project Hilo, Hawaii Applicant: A0705 Hilo, L.P. 2000 E. Fourth Street, Suite 220 Santa Ana, California 92705 Contact: James Rock (714) 835-3955 Agent: Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC 905 Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 Contact: Russell Okoji (808) 425-0968 Approving Agency: HHFDC 677 Queen Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 2 County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development 1990 Kinoʻole Street, Suite 102 Hilo, Hawaii 96720-5293 Project Location: Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Island of Hawaii Tax Map Keys (TMKs): (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 Total Affected Area: 219,978 square feet (5.05 acres) Existing Land Use: Currently unpaved and undeveloped State Land Use Classification: Urban Land Use Ordinance Zoning: MR-1.5 (Multiple-Family Residential Districts) State Special District: No Flood Zone: Flood Insurance Rate Map Zone X Land Owner: Giampaolo Boschetti 955 Prague Street San Francisco, CA 92705 PROJECT NAME:FIGURE TITLE:FIGURE NUMBER:1Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Hilo, HawaiiTMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, and (3) 2-4-025:080Site Location MapSite BoundaryÜ^_Site Location 4 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. FIGURE NUMBER:2Phase I Environmental Site AssessmentKaiaulu O Kapiolani Hilo, HawaiiTMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, and(3)2-4-025:080TMK MapKUKUAU STK IN O O L E S T INIA LNU L U LA N I S T K A P IO L A N I S T HUALALAI STHOKU STWAILOA STPONAHAWAI STMOHOULI STP O P O L O S T IPUKA STPA NAE WA STMAUNA LOA S T HEMA STHALE NANI STHE I L NKILAUEA AVEM A U NA KE A S T A K A H I S TBARENABA LNHOLOMALIA STK U MU K O A S TLANIKUKIA PLA H E A HE S TDERBY LNIL IM A L NDESKY LN HILINAI STAKIALOHA LNIL IM A L NWailoa RWailoa RKUKUAU STK IN O O L E S T INIA LNU L U L A N I S T K A PI O L A N I S T HUALALAI STHOKU STWAILOA STPONAHAWAI STMOHOULI STP O P O LO S T PA N A E WA S T IPUKA STMAU N A L O A S T H A L E N A N I S T H O L O M A L IA S T PROJECT NAME:FIGURE TITLE:01,0002,0003,0004,000500FeetÜLegendTMK BoundaryTMK (3) 2-4-025:048TMK (3) 2-4-025:053TMK (3) 2-4-025:080 6 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 7 SECTION 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Purpose and Need Purpose: This EA has been prepared to satisfy the requirements of HRS Chapter 343, HUD, and NEPA and 24 CFR Part 58 Environmental Review Procedures. The purpose of the Proposed Action (i.e., construction of a new affordable housing development) is to assist the State of Hawaii in addressing affordable housing needs. Need: The Office of the Governor of Hawaii has expressed a specific need to create additional affordable housing for the very low income to moderate income households. The Hawaii State Legislature has also recognized this need by passing legislation that has increased monies to funds such as the Rental Housing Revolving Fund for financing to build affordable rental housing units. This project helps to fulfill this need for affordable rental housing. The Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism (DBEDT) projects a population increase in Hawaii County of 29.5% by 2025. This would result in a total demand of between 7,816 and 13,527 additional housing units for Hawaii County by 2025 (DBEDT, 2019). 2.2 Project Description The proposed development site (TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080) encompasses 5.05 acres of land situated in Hilo on the east side of the Island of Hawaii. Currently, this location is zoned for multi- family dwelling units. A0705 Hilo, L.P. is proposing to develop an affordable rental complex of 64 units, consisting of 32 two-bedroom units, an estimated 24 three-bedroom units, and an estimated 8 4-bedroom units in Hilo (Figures 3-11). The development will include a community center for resident use (Figure 12) and at least 80 117 parking stalls. The objective of this project is to produce an affordable rental development, while utilizing the least amount of State of Hawaii resources. These apartments will target low income households earning 60 percent or less of the Area Median Income (AMI) for the County of Hawai‘i. These units will address the dire need for affordable rentals for the households in this income bracket, many of whom are at risk of becoming homeless due to the severe housing shortage. 2.3 Construction Time Frame and Estimated Project Construction Cost The construction period is estimated to be from 2022 through 2023. Construction is estimated to begin first quarter of 2022. Completion is anticipated in the fourth quarter of 2023. The total budget for these improvement activities is estimated at $53,888,000 $46,400,000. The anticipated primary financing will be provided by Hunt Capital Partners and Section 8 Project Based Vouchers. HHFDC has awarded Tax Exempt Bonds, tax credits and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. 8 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Site plan FIGURE NUMBER: 3 10 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Building Type A Floor Plan FIGURE NUMBER: 4 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 UP 44'-8" UNIT '5' 40'-6" UNIT '1' 5'-2"24'-6"UNIT '5'24'-6"UNIT '2'UP VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 ELECTRICALCLOSET 24'-6"UNIT '1'24'-6"UNIT '4'VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 DN DN 44'-8" UNIT '7' 42'-2" UNIT '6' 3'-6"24'-6"UNIT '7'24'-6"UNIT '6'SL 24'-6"UNIT '6'24'-6"UNIT '7'VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 VITREOUS CHINALAVATORYLADENAK-2214 RIDGEVALLEYVALLEYSL SL RIDGEVALLEY VALLEYSL SLVALLEYSL SL VALLEYRIDGESL SL VALLEYVALLEYRIDGERIDGE4:12SLSL4:122'-6" TYP. 12" TYP. ROOF BELOW 2'-6" TYP. 3'-0"TYP. ROOF BELOW 2'-0" TYP.A-1.0 BUILDING TYPE 'A'FLOOR PLANS AND ROOF PLAN 1 FIRST FLOOR PLANA-1.0SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 2 SECOND FLOOR PLANA-1.0SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" BUILDING 'A'3 ROOF PLANA-1.0SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" Sheet No ____ of _____ Drawing Number Drawn Checked Designed Drawing Title Project NumberProject NameRevision Number/DescriptionDate This work was prepared by meor under my supervision and will be under my observation.construction of this project Expiration Date of the License Signature PartnersIncorporated Design ArchitecturePlanningInteriors Design 2 3 4 5 D C B A 1 2 3 4 51 0 0 / 0 0 / 0 0 A0705 HILO LPKaiaulu O Kapiolani-TMK : 2-4-025:48,53,80(POR) 17056 FEB 2019 0 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2'4'16'8' 12 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Building Type A Elevations FIGURE NUMBER: 5 14 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Building Type B Floor Plan FIGURE NUMBER: 6 16 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Building Type B Elevations FIGURE NUMBER: 7 18 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Building Type C Floor Plan FIGURE NUMBER: 8 20 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Building Type C Elevations FIGURE NUMBER: 9 22 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Building Type D Floor Plan FIGURE NUMBER: 10 24 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Building Type D Elevations FIGURE NUMBER: 11 26 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Community Center Floor Plan FIGURE NUMBER: 12 28 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 29 Section 3 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION This section details the Alternatives that were analyzed in the EA. Under NEPA (as implemented by the CEQ regulations [40 CFR Parts 1500-1508]) and HAR, Title 11, Department of Health, Chapter 200 Environmental Impact Statement Rules, Section 11-200-17 (f), all alternatives considered for the proposed project should be evaluated. These alternatives may possibly enhance environmental quality or avoid, reduce, or minimize some or all of the adverse environmental effects, costs, and risks. 3.1 Alternative I: No Action Alternative Under the No Action alternative, the Site would be kept as is with no changes or alterations. This alternative would not accomplish the goals detailed in Section 2.1, Purpose and Need and would leave much of the existing Site vacant. 3.2 Alternative II: The Proposed Action The Proposed Action is the construction of a 64-unit multi-family apartment complex (Figures 4, 6, 8, 10). This development would provide affordable housing to low income households. 30 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 31 Section 4 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT This section discusses the current status of the potentially affected environments should the Proposed Action be implemented. Affected environments include important natural and cultural sources and systems. Environmental consequences are provided in Section 5. 4.1 Physical Environment 4.1.1 Topography and Geology According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS), Honolulu, Hawaii, 7.5 minute topographic map, the subject property is located at -155.087087 – 155o 5’ 14’ longitude and 19.71405 – 19o 42’ 51” latitude, approximately 91 feet above mean sea level (EDR, 2019e). The Site is unpaved and undeveloped with overgrown vegetation covering the majority of the parcel. Vegetation on the Site and surrounding property was found to be heavily wooded and associated with the moist conditions of the area. No chemicals or hazardous materials were observed on the subject property. No noticeable spills, unusual odors, or evidence of oil contamination was noted during the site reconnaissance in February 2019. The subject Site address submitted to the Environmental Database Resource (EDR) was not listed in any reviewed databases searched by EDR. The Site is located south of the Wailuku River, which is the approximate boundary between the lava flows from Mauna Kea (north) and those from Mauna Loa (south). The Mauna Loa lava flow consists of Ka’u volcanic series, an extremely permeable basalt. There are patches of Pahala ash on some older Mauna Loa lavas near the Wailuku River, but are insignificant in contrast to the wide extent of bare Ka’u lava over the remainder of the area (Buchanan-Banks, J.M., 1993a). 4.1.2 Soils The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service classifies the soil within the Site as 100% Keaukaha-Urban land complex. It is classified as Hydrologic Soil Group D with a typical profile consisting of highly decomposed plant material from 0 to 4 inches below ground surface (bgs), and lithic bedrock from 4 to 14 inches bgs. The soils have a high runoff class, which indicates they are well drained. The depth to groundwater is more than 80 inches (USDA, 2019). 4.1.3 Natural Hazard The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) #1551660736F is a Non-Printed Flood Map Boundary. Upon consultation with the County of Hawaii Engineering division, it was determined that the Site lies within Flood Zone X, beyond the 500-year flood plain (Figure 13). The Hawaiian Islands are seasonally affected by Pacific hurricanes from the months of June to November. The State has been affected by significant hurricanes in the past, including Hiki (1950), Nina (1957), Dot (1959), Iwa (1982), Iniki (1992), and Iselle (2014). The main concerns with hurricanes are the damaging winds, heavy rains, and high surf. According to a report presented at the International Union of Conservation of Nature World Conservation Congress, global climate 32 change could mean that Hawaii may experience more frequent and more severe hurricanes in the future (HNN, 2016). A tsunami is a series of waves caused by earthquakes or undersea volcanic eruptions that can impact all shorelines (NOAA, 2019). This Site is not located in a tsunami evacuation zone. The County of Hawaii, Evacuation Zone Map is presented in Figure 15. Due to the volcanic nature of the Hawaiian Islands, the islands are very vulnerable to seismic activity. Most of the earthquakes in Hawaii occur on the island of Hawaii, as it is the only island with an active volcano. However, other earthquakes are caused by the weight of the Hawaiian Islands on the Pacific lithosphere (Nullet, Dennis). According to USGS, the Site is located in Lava-Flow Hazard Zone 3, which are areas less hazardous than Zone 2 due to greater distance from recent active vents (Figure 14). The eruption and subsequent lava flows that occurred in 2018 were located south of the Site in the Kilauea lava flow, which was designated Lava-Flow Hazard Zone 2 and 3 (Wright, Chun, & Exposo et. al., 2011). The Site is not anticipated to be impacted by waves, storm surges, high tide or shoreline erosion. According to the Hawaii Sea Level Rise Viewer, mapping of the project site shows it is not susceptible to sea level rise at 0.5 feet (www.hawaiisealevelriseviewer.com), Appendix A, Exhibit 5. 4.1.4 Flora and Fauna A Biological Survey was not performed on the Site. A pre-consult letter was sent to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) in order to serve as a biological inquiry, but a response was not received before the submission date for this EA. USFWS identified the following species as may occurring or transiting through the vicinity of the proposed project area. • the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus semotus), • the endangered Hawaiian goose (Branta sandvicensis), • the endangered Band-rumped storm petrel (Oceanodroma castro), • the endangered Hawaiian petrel (Pterodroma sandwichensis), • the threatened Newell’s shearwater (Puffinus newelli), • the endangered Hawaiian stilt or aeʻo (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni), • the endangered Hawaiian coot or ʻalae keʻokeʻo (Fulica alai), and • the endangered Blackburn’s sphinx moth. The Hawaiian petrel, band-rumped storm-petrel, and Newell’s shearwater will hereafter, collectively be referred to as “Hawaiian seabirds,” and the Hawaiian stilt and Hawaiian coot will be referred to as “Hawaiian waterbirds.” The USFWS determined there is no critical habitat for listed species in the vicinity of this proposed project. During the Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS), some plant species were noted. Senior Archaeologists Glen and Suzan Escott noted that the area was dominated by trees, grasses, ferns, and bushes. The tree species include gunpowder (Trema orientalis), autograph (Clusia rosea), PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Flood Insurance Rate Map FIGURE NUMBER: 13 USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed April, 2019. National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet Ü155°5'31.01"W 19°43'5.78"N 155°4'53.55"W 19°42'31.91"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone X Future Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard Zone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes.Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 8/8/2019 at 6:10:37 PM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes. Legend OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERALSTRUCTURES OTHERFEATURES MAP PANELS 8 1:6,000 B 20.2 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. 34 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Lava Flow Hazard Zones FIGURE NUMBER: 14 36 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: NOAA Tsunami Zone Evacuation Map FIGURE NUMBER: 15 38 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 39 banyan (Ficus sp.), guava (Psidium sp.), and bingabing (Macaranga mappa), none of which are native plant species. No mammals, birds, or insects were noted during the AIS. A Biological Survey was conducted by SSFM International in October of 2018 at a proposed hydroelectric facility at Wailuku River, about two and a half miles northwest of the Site. Since this Biological Survey was conducted only a few miles from the site in an area not too much higher in elevation (approximately 350 feet higher than the Site), it can be assumed that the project areas would have similar plant and animal species. The follow are the findings of SSFM International’s Biological Survey. The area was previously dominated by native ‘ohi’a and koa trees, but the native vegetation has mostly been destroyed by farming and cultivation of sugar cane. The area is now dominated by non-native plant species. Threatened or endangered wide-ranging terrestrial vertebrate species, such as the endangered Hawaiian hawk and endangered Hawaiian hoary bat may be present in the area. The Hawaiian hawk is endemic to Hawaii, but is currently only found on the Island of Hawaii. They breed in stands of the native ‘ohi’a trees, but utilize a broad range of areas for foraging, including wooded areas with both native or non- native vegetation. A total of six migratory Birds of Conservation Concern were identified in the USFWS’s Information for Planning and Consrvation (IPaC) database. The endangered Hawaiian hoary bat (Lashiurus cinereus semotus) is the only native terrestrial mammal species that still exists in the Hawaiian Islands. They forage in open, wooded, and linear habitats with a wide range of vegetation types. Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife noted the State listed Hawaiian Hawk or ‘Io (Buteo solitarius) is known to occur in the project vicinity. And the Hawaiian Hoary Bat or ʻŌpeʻapeʻa (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. 4.1.5 Wetlands The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory, Wetland Mapper (USFWS, 2017) did not identify any wetlands in the project area. The nearest wetlands are Wailuku River, which is located approximately ½ mile north of the Site; Alenaio Stream, which is located approximately ¾ miles southeast the Site; and Waloa Pond, which is located approximately a mile southeast from the Site. The Wetlands Mapper figure is presented as Figure 16. 4.1.6 Water Resources Groundwater Groundwater in Hawaii occurs in volcanic rock aquifers, which consist of a freshwater lens that floats on saltwater, separated by a zone of brackish water (SSFM, 2018). The Site overlies the Hilo aquifer system of the Northeast Mauna Loa aquifer sector. The aquifer is a basal (fresh water in contact with sea water), unconfined (where water table is upper surface of saturated aquifer), flank aquifer. It is classified as currently used, drinking, irreplaceable, and highly vulnerable to contamination, and fresh water (<250 milligrams per liter [mg/l] chloride [Cl-]) (Mink and Lau, 1992). The sustainable yield of the aquifer has been estimated at 347 million gallons per day 40 (County of Hawaii, 2014). The Project Site is not located above any of the nine Sole-Source aquifers identified in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (US EPA) Region 9. According to a 1-mile radius search from the Site, the EDR report listed two (2) United States Geological Survey (USGS) wells within a 1-mile radius of the Site (EDR, 2019e). The nearest Federal Public Water Supply (PWS) well is located within a ¼-mile radius from the Site. The subject property of the well is located up-gradient of the Underground Injection Control Line (UIC) therefore it is considered a potable water resource. The subject property of the other well is located down-gradient of the UIC therefore, not considered a potable water resource. Injection wells do require a UIC permit or permit exemption and permit limitations are imposed (Figure 17). Studies have shown anticipated sea level rise could affect the boundary between saltwater and freshwater, causing freshwater to be lifted. The result is a rise in the groundwater table. Low elevation coastal planes and shallow groundwater tables are prevalent in Hawaii. The rise in the groundwater level could affect drinking water by turning wells that were previously freshwater into brackish or saline. Groundwater at the Site is in contact with seawater. The aquifer supporting the site could experience impacts from sea level rise (Figure 18). Surface Water There are no streams or surface water features at the Site. The nearest natural body of water is the Pacific Ocean to the north. There is a natural occurring pond, Waiakea Pond, within a mile east of the vicinity. The pond, which flows into Hilo Bay, is utilized as a recreational public fishing area (Department of Land and Natural Resources). 4.1.7 Climate and Air Quality Climate The climate in Hilo is characterized as a subtropical rainforest climate with substantial rainfall throughout the year. The temperature and amount of rainfall in Hilo varies based on altitude, with cooler temperatures and greater precipitation in higher elevations. Temperatures in Hilo remain moderate and steady throughout the year, with an average temperature of 73 oF. The steady temperature reflects small seasonal variation in energy received from the sun and the temperature effect of the surrounding Pacific Ocean. The average high temperature in Hilo is 80.9 oF, which generally occurs during the months of July through October. The average low temperature in Hilo is 66.8 oF, which generally occurs during the months of January and February (U.S. Climate Data). Hilo, which is located on the windward side of the island, has a very wet climate. Hilo receiving an average of approximately 126.69 inches of rain per year (U.S. Climate Data). Air Quality The Clean Air Act of 1972 and its 1990 Amendments (CAA) and subsequent legislation regulate air emissions from area, stationary, and mobile sources. Both the USEPA and the State of Hawaii have instituted Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) to maintain air quality in the interest of public health and secondary public welfare. Currently, the parameters that are regulated include: particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, ozone and PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Wetland Map FIGURE NUMBER: 16 Kaiulu O Kapiolani wetlands U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,wetlands_team@fws.gov Wetlands Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine August 9, 2019 0 0.3 0.60.15 mi 0 0.5 10.25 km 1:19,111 This page was produced by the NWI mapperNational Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the basedatashown on this map.Allwetlands relateddata should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the WetlandsMapper website. 42 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: Underground Control Injection Map FIGURE NUMBER: 17 44 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: State Sea Level Rise Exposure Area Map FIGURE NUMBER: 18 46 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 47 lead. The Hawaii AAQS are in some cases considerably more stringent than the comparable National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). In particular, the Hawaii 1-hour AAQS for carbon monoxide is four times more stringent than the comparable national limit. The largest source of air pollution in the immediate project area is most likely associated with automobile traffic. Emissions from automobile traffic consist primarily of particulate matter, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. Volcanic emissions from Kilauea Volcano also affect the air quality during “Kona” or southerly wind conditions. The Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) operates a network of air quality monitoring stations at various locations around the state, including a station in Hilo located near the Hilo Medical Center. This station monitors particulate matter (PM) 2.5 and sulfur dioxide (SO2). Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events; therefore, the USEPA may exclude exceedances of the one-hour NAAQS from attainment determinations (HDOH, 2016). The State of Hawaii is in attainment with the NAAQS for all pollutants regulated by the USEPA. In addition to the NAAQS and the State AAQS, the HDOH regulates fugitive dust. HAR Section 11-60.1-33, Fugitive Dust, states that no person shall cause or permit visible fugitive dust to become airborne without taking reasonable precautions, and no person shall cause or permit the discharge of visible fugitive dust beyond the property lot line on which the fugitive dust originates (HDOH, 2019). This rule applies to construction projects and would therefore be applicable to the Proposed Action. The Site is located within 5 miles of Hilo International Airport. Specifically, it is approximately 1.55 miles from Runway 3. Due to the proximity of the airport, there are potential for fumes, smoke, vibrations, odors, etc. that may result from aircraft flight operations overhead. 4.1.8 Noise Noise is defined as unwanted sound and is one of the most common environmental issues of concern to the public. The State of Hawaii Community Noise Control Rule (HAR Chapter 11-46) defines three classes of zoning districts and specifies corresponding maximum permissible sound levels due to stationary noise sources (air-conditioning units, generators, pumps, etc.), but does not address most moving sources (vehicular traffic, air traffic, etc.). However, noise relating to construction activities is regulated. Noise impacts from construction-related activities are regulated under the HAR, HDOH, Title 11, Chapter 46, Community Noise Control. The project area is located in a residential zone, and as such falls into District Class A under the HDOH regulations, with a maximum day (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and night (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) sound level threshold of 55 decibels (dBA). This sound threshold is enforced for any location at or beyond the property line, which cannot be exceeded for more than 10% of the time during any 20-minute period. District Class A also covers areas zoned as military and federal preservation land, conservation, open space and public space. Table 1 lists sound exposure levels (SELs) associated with typical equipment, in varying operating modes. 48 Table 1: Typical Equipment Sound Levels Equipment Sound Level (in dBA) Under Indicated Operational Mode Idle Power Full Power Moving Under Load Dozer 63 74 81 Dump Truck 70 71 74 Excavator 62 66 72 Forklift 63 69 91 Front-end Loader 60 62 68 Grader 64 68 78 Sweeper 64 76 85 Tractor-Trailer 67 78 77 The Site is located outside the 55 Day-Night Average Sound Levels noise contours on the 2018 Hilo International Airport map, however there is potential for single event noise from aircraft operations. 4.1.9 Solid Wastes Public facilities for solid waste on the island of Hawaii includes two landfills West Hawaii Sanitary Landfill and East Hawaii Reload Facility and twenty-one transfer stations. There are two three locations near the site, South Hilo Sanitary Landfill, East Hawaii Organics Facility, and Hilo Transfer Station. 4.1.10 Hazardous Wastes Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC performed a Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in 2019. The findings are summarized below: ● The Site is unpaved and undeveloped with overgrown vegetation covering the majority of the parcel. No chemicals or hazardous materials were observed on the subject property. No noticeable spills or evidence of oil contamination was noted during the site reconnaissance. Vegetation on the Site and surrounding property was found to be heavily wooded, most likely associated with the humid and moist condition of the area. No unusual odors or staining were noticed indicating a potential environmental condition. ● The Site was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. The EDR database search provides a review of federal, state, and local lists and available files of reported hazardous waste sites and hazardous substance/petroleum product sources and releases. ● There are no underground storage tanks (USTs) located on the Site, or on properties adjacent to the Site. No leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites were located directly adjacent to the Site. A search of the HDOH UST Branch database records (dated 49 08/31/2018) resulted in eleven (11) sites having reported a UST release within a ½-mile radius of the Site. According to the HDOH LUST database, of the 11 LUST sites, nine (9) sites are recorded as Site Cleanup Completed and were issued a No Further Action (NFA). The LUST sites do not pose an environmental threat to the subject Site. ● ERA observed three (3) electrical transformers located near the Site. Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO) was queried regarding if the polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) status of these transformers were known. HELCO responded that all three (3) observed pole mounted transformers were non-PCB containing. 4.2 Social Environment 4.2.1 Land Use Considerations and Zoning The County of Hawaii, Planning Division, indicates the Site Land Use Ordinance Zoning Designation is Multi-family Dwelling Units (RM 1.5). The Site is not located in a Special District or Special Management Area. 4.2.2 Archaeological and Cultural Considerations The project area located in Hilo, Hawaii, Tax Map Keys (TMKs) (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080, consists of a 5.05-acre parcel located on the west side of Kapiolani Street, where it intersects with Kukuau Street. The substrate of the project area is a Mauna Loa lava flow dated between 750 and 1,500 years ago. The soil of the project area is Keaukaha Series (rKFD) extremely rocky much overlaying pahoehoe lava. Scattered subsistence agriculture was evident around the project area. The Site is located on level to moderately sloping land at 95 feet above mean sea level. Early accounts of settlements on the windward side of the island describe the Hilo area as having several different environmental regions. From Hilo Bay to approximately 6 miles inland was scattered subsistence agriculture, followed by a region full of tall ferns and bracken. In the higher elevations were forest regions spanning 10 to 20 miles across, followed by an expanse of grass and lava. The rich marine resources of Hilo Bay and gently sloping forests of Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea provided abundant resources for the local people. Hilo was established as a royal center by the sixteenth century and became a port of call for whalers and merchant ships, and a point of entry for missionaries and travelers. Hilo continued to develop as a commercial port throughout the twentieth century, and eventually became developed with shopping centers and malls, industrial parks and residential neighborhoods. A search was conducted for archaeological sites and architectural structures within approximate half-mile of the current project area that are eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and Hawaii Register of Historic Places (HRHP). These Sites include two historical districts, several church buildings, schools, commercial buildings, homes, and a Portuguese oven. The Site is comprised of TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080. An AIS was conducted at each of the parcels in order to identify archaeological features and sites that may be located on the parcel. An AIS of parcels 048 and 053 had previously been conducted by Nelson, Clark and Rechtman in 2006. An AIS of parcel 080 was conducted on July 11, 2019 by Senior Archaeologists Glen Escott M.A. and Suzan Escott, B.A of Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS). There was no evidence 50 of prehistoric or historic sites or features observed during the field survey of the parcels. Based on historical and archaeological literature review, consultation efforts and responses, and the reconnaissance survey, SCS concluded that there are no indications that specific traditional and customary practices are being carried in the vicinity of the project area. There is a low probability that surface and subsurface archaeological features and/or human remains would be discovered by excavations in the area. SCS recommended a determination of “no historic properties affected” for the proposed development project. State Historic Preservation Division accepted the AIS and report concurred with the finding of “no historic properties affected”. An Archaelogical Field Inspection was conducted in September 2020 by ASM Affiliates (Appendix A, Exhibit 11). A 100% surface inspection was performed of the entire parcel. No lava blisters or historic properties were observed. ASM Affiliates recommended a “no historic properties affected” determination for the property. Cultural Impact Assessment for TMK (3) 2-4-025:080 A Cultural Impact Assessment (October 2019) was conducted by Scientific Consultant Service, Inc. for the project site (Appendix A, Exhibit 11). Based on the results of an Archaeological Assessment of the project area, the results of previous archaeological studies, as well as organizational response, individual cultural informant responses, and archival research, it is reasonable to conclude that, pursuant to Act 50, the exercise of native Hawaiian rights, or any ethnic group, related to gathering, access or other customary activities will not be affected by development activities on this parcel. The proposed project is not a location for past or ongoing cultural practices. The proposed undertaking will not produce adverse effects to any native Hawaiian cultural practices within the project area or in the broader region. As suggested in the “Guidelines for Accessing Cultural Impacts” (OEQC 1997), CIAs incorporating personal interviews should include ethnographic and oral history interview procedures, circumstances attending the interviews, as well as the results of this consultation. It is also permissible to include organizations with individuals familiar with cultural practices and features associated with the project area. As stated above, consultation was sought from Kamaile Puluole-Mitchell, Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) East Hawaii Island Representative; Jordan Kea Calpito, SHPD Burial Sites Specialist; Sean Naleimaile, State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) Hawaii Island Archaeologist; and Kalena Blakemore, Hawaii Island Burial Council (HIBC) Member. Public notices were printed in the September 2019 issue of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) Ka Wai Ola Newspaper. Public notices were also published in the Honolulu Star- Advertiser, and the Hawaii Tribune Herald on August 14th, 15th, and 18th. The public notices did not generate responses from the public. This fact is not surprising since it is unlikely as there no known inland locations in Hilo town where gathering or cultural practices occur. An analysis of the potential effect of the proposed construction of residences on cultural resources, practices or beliefs, its potential to isolate cultural resources, practices or beliefs from their setting, and the potential of the project to introduce elements which may alter the setting in which cultural practices take place is a requirement of the OEQC (No. 10, 1997). To our knowledge, the project 51 area was used as a location for animal husbandry in the late Historic to Modern eras. Based on historical research and responses from the above listed contacts, it is reasonable to conclude that, as the current project was not and is not a location for past and ongoing cultural practices, there will be no traditional cultural practices affected and there will be no direct adverse effect upon cultural practices or beliefs in the broader project area region. 4.2.3 Transportation Traffic and Circulation A Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) was conducted for the Site by Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc., received June 21, 2019 (provided in Appendix A). The following are the results of their study. The Site will be made accessible along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street. Kapiolani Street provides access to residential and commercial areas as well as institutional uses, such as the Hawaii Police Department, Hilo Driver Licensing Station, and the University of Hawaii (UH) at Hilo. Kukuau Street mainly provides access to residential and commercial areas in South Hilo. Hualalai Street, which is located northeast of the Site, provides access to St. Joseph School and residential and commercial areas. Kupukupu Street, which is located approximately a ¼-mile southeast of the Site, provides access to Kukuau Street to 5 existing residential buildings, and is proposed as one of the access roads to the project. The Site is equidistant to two major highways, Route 200 and Route 19, which are approximately a mile northwest and a mile northeast. The immediate area surrounding the site is a developed residential area, therefore, traffic is generally light to moderate. The main source of traffic in the area is the surrounding schools, with over 8 schools in the area including Hilo High School and UH Hilo. Therefore, peak traffic hours occur from 7AM to 8AM, and then in the afternoon from 3:45PM to 4:45PM. The intersections of Kukuau Street and Kupukupu Street, Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street, and Kapiolani Street and Hualalai Street are all unsignalized. The roads surrounding the Site are considered “complete streets”, which encourage equitable, accessible, and safe transportation for all modes. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway on Kapiolani Street and Hualalai Street. Kukuau Street only has a sidewalk provided along the eastbound direction of the roadway. There is a bicycle lane located on Kukuau Street, and a signed shared roadway on Kapiolani Street. The Island of Hawaii utilizes the public transportation of the Hele-On Bus. There are no bus routes that run along the streets surrounding the project area, however, there is a bus stop approximately a half mile away from the Site on Kilauea Avenue. The study addressed the following: ● Existing traffic operating conditions at key intersections during the weekday morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hours of traffic within the study area. ● Traffic projections for Base Year 2021 (without the development of the Site) including traffic generated by other known developments in the vicinity of the Site in addition to an ambient growth rate. These other known developments are projects that are currently under 52 construction or known new/future developments that are anticipated to affect traffic demand and operations within the study area. ● Trip generation and traffic assignment characteristics for the proposed development of the Site. ● Traffic projections for Future Year 2021 (with the development of the Site), which includes Base Year traffic volumes in addition to traffic volumes generated by project. ● Recommendations for Base Year as well as Future Year roadway improvements or other mitigative measures, as appropriate, to reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts resulting from traffic generated by known developments in the region or the Site. Based on the study, existing traffic volumes in the study area were generally light with the studied roadways servicing local traffic only. All intersections were observed to operate adequately with no major delays to any movements. The study intersections operate satisfactorily during both peak hours of traffic with all movements operating at LOS C or better. Base year 2021 predictions state that although some of the minor street movements are expected to experience longer delays, all minor street movements are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. All major street movements are anticipated to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours. According to Future Year 2021 predictions, at full buildout, the Site is projected to generate a total of 32 net external trips during the AM peak hours of traffic, and 42 net external trips during the PM peak hours of traffic. Traffic from the Project is expected to generate growth along major roadways in the study area. It is anticipated that by Future Year 2021 with the Project, traffic will increase slightly compared to Base Year 2021 conditions without the Project due to the projected growth along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street. Despite the added traffic, all movements will continue to operate similar to Base Year 2021 conditions at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. Both Project access intersections are anticipated to operate with all movements at LOS B or better during both peak hours. Study findings are presented in Table 2. Table 2: LOS Summary Table Existing Conditions and Base Year 2021 53 Airports The Site is located approximately 1.55 miles from the end of Runway 3 at the Hilo International Airport. Due to the proximity of the Site to the Hilo International Airport, there is a potential for fumes, smoke, vibrations, odors, etc. that may result from aircraft flight operations over the proposed housing development. While the Site is located outside the 55 Day-Night Average Sound Levels area on the Noise Exposure Map, which can be seen in Appendix A, Exhibit 12, there is still a potential to create noise pollution from aircraft operations. Also, according to the Federal Aviation Association (FAA), the use of Photovoltaic (PV) systems near the approach path of aircrafts is prohibited, as it may interfere with radio communications and visually impair the pilots. The Site is not located within a Runway Protection Zone/Clear Zone (RPZ/CZ) or Accident Potential Zone (APZ). 4.2.4 Social Factors and Community Identity Aerial photographs from 2013 depicts the area as it appears today with a police station to the northeast of the site. The Site is located approximately a mile away from Hilo Elementary School, Hilo High School, along with several other schools. Wailoa River State Recreational Area is located less than two miles from the Site. Within two miles of the Site are several small shops, grocery stores, drug stores, coffee shops, and restaurants. Two beachfront hotels and a golf course are located approximately two miles from the Site. According to the U.S. Census Bureau the population in Hilo is approximately 43,263 people (Census, 2010). There are approximately 15,955 households, with an average of 2.78 people per household (Census, 2013-2017). 4.2.5 Recreational and Public Facilities Recreational activities in the area mainly consist of outdoor activities such as swimming, surfing, scuba diving, snorkeling, dolphin and whale watching, hiking and camping, golfing, boating and fishing. A number of recreational areas and facilities are located throughout the island of Hawaii, consisting of beach parks, golf courses, district and neighborhood parks, and community centers. Honoli’i Beach Park, Keaukaha Beach Park, and Laupahoehoe Beach Park are popular beach parks located on the east side of the island. Several state parks are located on the east side of the island as well, including ‘Akaka Falls State Park, Wailoa River State Park, Lava Tree State Monument, and Hawaii Volcanoes National Park. There are several resorts found around Hilo Bay, which is located northeast of the Site. Five (5) public recreational facilities were identified within a 1-mile radius of the project site. Lincoln Park is a County of Hawaii owned; public park located approximately 1500-feet north of the project site. Hilo Bayfront Soccer fields is a public park located approximately 3000-feet northeast of the project site. Mohouli Park is a public park located approximately 3000-feet southwest of the project site. University Heights Park is a County of Hawaii owned; public park located approximately 3200-feet south of the project Site. 54 4.2.6 Visual and Aesthetic Resources The Site is located in a residential area and is not specifically identified in any county or State plans or studies as containing scenic vistas or view planes. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani site is not identified as a scenic vista or view plane nor will it affect identified scenic vistas or view planes. The community will not affect scenic corridors and coastal scenic and open space resources. In addition, the project development will not have buildings exceeding two stories. 4.2.7 Infrastructure Systems and Utilities Electricity service is supplied by Hawaiian Electric. Telephone, cable, and internet can be provided by Spectrum or Hawaiian Telcom, as well as satellite service providers. County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply is responsible for providing drinking water for all of Hawaii County. The infrastructure is expected to be able to meet the drinking water demand of the proposed project, as the water demand would be an additional 64 75 units, whereas a previous proposed project at the Site had a water demand of an additional 97 units. Wastewater and sewer are managed by the County of Hawaii Wastewater Division. There is no sewer main on the Site, but there is a 10-inch sewer main located in Kukuau Street that may be an option for wastewater and sewer, as long as it can meet the demand of an extra 14,280 gallons per day (gpd) from the proposed project. The Hawaii County Fire Department has 20 stations throughout the island of Hawaii. There is one station in Hilo, “Station 1”, which is located at 466 Kinoole Street, less than a mile away from the Site. The next nearest station is “Station 2”, located at 95 Keaa St., which is approximately 2.3 miles from the Site. The Hawaii Police Department is headquartered in Hilo, which is located at 349 Kapiolani Street, directly across the street from the Site. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani is located within the Hawaii School District, Hilo Complex. The schools located in the Hilo complex include: de Silva Elementary, Haaheo Elementary, Hilo High, Hilo Intermediate, Hilo Union Elementary, Kalanianaole Elementary and Intermediate, Chiefess Kapiolani Elementary, Kaumana Elementary, Keaukaha Elementary, Connections NCPCS, Ka ‘Umeke Ka’eo PCS, and Ke Ana La’ahana PCS. Hilo Union, Hilo Intermediate, and Hilo High School are all within a mile of the Site. University of Hawaii at Hilo, and Hawaii Community College, and Pacific Academy of Music are all located on the east side of the island of Hawaii. University of Hawaii at Hilo and Hawaii Community College offer on-site and distance learning classes and program. Other colleges and universities are located on the west side of Hawaii Island. The Hele-On Bus transportation system is available for seniors and persons with disability and those with mobility devices. Hele-On Kako’o is available in the Hilo and Kona area. There are two (2) Hele-On bus stations within a 1/2-mile radius of the project Site. The Hele-On Mo’oheau Bus Terminal located at 329 Kamehameha Avenue and the hele-On Bus Stop located at 16-44 Ohuohu Street in Hilo, Hawaii. 55 Section 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES AND PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES Potential impacts of Alternative I: No Action and Alternative II: Proposed Action are described in this section of the report. Impacts are evaluated on whether they constitute a “significant effect” on a particular environmental setting. Impacts are described as having No Impact, Significant Adverse Impact or Beneficial Impact depending on the outcome to the environment. The terms impact and effect are used synonymously in this EA. Impacts may apply to the full range of natural, aesthetic, historic, cultural and economic resources. The following subsections define key terms used throughout Section 5, Significance Criteria A “significant effect” is defined by HRS Chapter 343 as “the sum of effects on the quality of the environment, including actions that irrevocably commit a natural resource, curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment, are contrary to the State’s environmental policies or long-term environmental goals as established by law, or adversely affect the economic welfare, social welfare, or cultural practices of the community and State.” Beneficial Versus Adverse Impacts from the proposed Action may also have beneficial or adverse effects to the environment. Beneficial impacts are those that have favorable outcomes and add value to the environment. Adverse impacts are those that produce detrimental effects and cause harm to the environment. Cumulative Impacts Cumulative impacts are two or more individual effects which, when considered together, compound or increase the overall impact. Cumulative impacts can arise from the individual effects of a single action or from the combined effects of past, present, or future actions. Thus, cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant actions taken over a period of time. The cumulative impacts of implementing the Proposed Action along with past and reasonably foreseeable future projects proposed were assessed based upon available information. Cumulative impacts are discussed in Section 5.3. Mitigative Measures Mitigative measures are defined as measures taken to avoid, reduce and compensate for adverse impacts to a resource. Mitigative measures are identified and discussed for each alternative, where relevant. In this EA, mitigative measures are provided to reduce adverse impacts when levels of impact are more than minor and to ensure levels of impact are not significant. Only those mitigative measures that are practicable have been identified. 56 5.1 Physical Environment 5.1.1 Topography and Geology Alternative I No significant adverse impacts to the topography or geology are expected to result from Alternative I. The Site would remain the same as there would be no construction. Alternative II No significant adverse impacts to the topography or geology are expected to result from Alternative II. As the Site is essentially on a flat surface, no significant changes to the topography are necessary for construction. Construction and operational activities would follow existing topography. 5.1.2 Soils Alternative I No significant adverse impacts are anticipated for Alternative I. Site conditions would remain the same. Alternative II Alternative II could have a potential significant adverse impact to soils as a result of construction activities (i.e., clearing, grubbing, excavation and trenching) that disturb the earth and soils. Exposed soils are susceptible to erosion during periods of heavy rain or wind, which occur often due to the Site being located on the windward side (wet side) of the island. Short-term adverse impacts would be minimized to less than significant or avoided by implementing temporary erosion control measures during construction activities. All earthwork will conform to Hawaii County Code Chapter 10. All runoff will be disposed of on- site. An existing flood route is in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project site. Impacts from the undeveloped flood route have been evaluated. The developed condition flow will not exceed the pre-developed condition flow in accordance with County drainage standards. 5.1.3 Natural Hazard Alternative I No significant adverse impacts to natural hazard vulnerability would result from Alternative I as the Site will not change. 57 Alternative II No significant adverse impacts to natural hazard vulnerability would result from Alternative II. The project area lies approximately 91 feet above mean sea level and is classified within Flood Zone X, where the risk of flooding would be minimal. The Site is located in Lava-Flow Hazard Zone 3, where risk of adverse impacts by lava is fairly low. The Site is not located in a tsunami evacuation zone and does not lie within the 0.5 ft sea level rise exposure area. 5.1.4 Flora and Fauna Alternative I No significant adverse impacts to flora/fauna are anticipated by implementing Alternative I, as the Site would remain undeveloped. Alternative II No significant adverse impacts to flora and fauna are anticipated due to Alternative II. While no biological survey was conducted, no threatened or endangered species are believed to exist in the project area. An inquiry with the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was sent out and the following mitigative measures for potential species that may occur or transit the vicinity of the proposed project are listed below but was not received in time for the EA submission. Therefore, information Information on flora and fauna near the Site was attained from the AIS and an EA that was completed a few miles northwest of the Site. These studies revealed that there are two federally listed species in the vicinity of the project area. The following are recommendations to avoid or minimize project impacts to listed species: Endangered Hawaiian hawk Impacts to the endangered Hawaiian Hawk could occur due to vegetation removal, as these birds are known to forage and nest in all different types of vegetation. To minimize impact to the endangered Hawaiian hawk, all trees to be cut would be inspected to ensure that no Hawaiian hawk nests are present. Endangered Hawaiian hoary bat Impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat could occur due to vegetation removal, as they are known to forage in all types of vegetation and pup in trees that are 15 feet or taller. To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat, it is recommended that wooded plants greater than 15 feet tall during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15) not be disturbed, removed, or trimmed. It is also recommended that barbed wire fencing should not be used, as they are known to entangle the bats. 58 A “Biosecurity Protocol – Hawaiian Island (July 2018)” was included as information to prevent the spread of harmful invasive species. This document is presented in Appendix A, Exhibit 17. Endangered Hawaiian hoary bat The Hawaiian hoary bat roosts in both exotic and native woody vegetation across all islands and will leave young unattended in trees and shrubs when they forage. If trees or shrubs 15 feet or taller are cleared during the pupping season, there is a risk that young bats could inadvertently be harmed or killed since they are too young to fly or may not move away. Additionally, Hawaiian hoary bats forage for insects from as low as 3 feet to higher than 500 feet above the ground and can become entangled in barbed wire used for fencing. To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat, the USFWS recommend that projects incorporate the following applicable measures into the project description: • Do not disturb, remove, or trim woody plants greater than 15 feet tall during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). • Do not use barbed wire for fencing. Endangered Nene Nene are found on the islands of Hawaii, Maui, Molokai, and Kauai predominately, with a small population on Oahu. They are observed in a variety of habitats, but prefer open areas, such as pastures, golf courses, wetlands, natural grasslands and shrublands, and lava flows. Threats to the species include introduced mammalian and avian predators, wind facilities, and vehicle strikes. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to nene, the USFWS recommend that projects incorporate the following applicable measures into the project description: • Do not approach, feed, or disturb nene. • If nene are observed loafing or foraging within the project area during the breeding season (September through April), have a biologist familiar with the nesting behavior of nene survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. Repeat surveys after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). • Cease all work immediately and contact the Service for further guidance if a nest is discovered within a radius of 150 feet of proposed work, or a previously undiscovered nest is found within said radius after work begins. • In areas where nene are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. Endangered Hawaiian petrel, Threatened Newell’s Shearwater, and Endangered Band-rumped storm-petrel Newell’s shearwaters are found in the highest densities on Kauai with lower densities on all of the other islands, except Lanai. Hawaiian Petrel populations are greatest on Maui, Lanai, and Kauai 59 with lower densities on Hawaii and Molokai. Band-rumped storm-petrels are found in low densities throughout the islands. All islands may experience overflight at night. For all projects, Hawaiian seabirds may traverse the project area at night during the breeding, nesting and fledging seasons (March 1 to December 15). Outdoor lighting could result in seabird disorientation, fallout, and injury or mortality. Seabirds are attracted to lights and after circling the lights they may become exhausted and collide with nearby wires, buildings, or other structures or they may land on the ground. Downed seabirds are subject to increased mortality due to collision with automobiles, starvation, and predation by dogs, cats, and other predators. Young birds (fledglings) traversing the project area between September 15 and December 15, in their first flights from their mountain nests to the sea, are particularly vulnerable. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to seabirds, the USFWS recommend that projects incorporate the following applicable measures into the project description: • Fully shield all outdoor lights so the bulb can only be seen from below bulb height and only use when necessary. • Install automatic motion sensor switches and controls on all outdoor lights or turn off lights when human activity is not occurring in the lighted area. • Avoid nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 15 through December 15. Endangered Blackburn’s sphinx moth The Blackburn’s sphinx moth may be in the vicinity of the proposed project area. Adult moths feed on nectar from native plants, including beach morning glory (Ipomoea pes-caprae), iliee (Plumbago zeylanica), and maiapilo (Capparis sandwichiana); larvae feed upon non-native tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca) and native aiea (Nothocestrum sp.). To pupate, the larvae burrow into the soil and can remain in a state of torpor for up to a year (or more) before emerging from the soil. Soil disturbance can result in death of the pupae. We offer the following survey recommendations to assess whether the Blackburn’s sphinx moth is within the project area: • A biologist familiar with the species should survey areas of proposed activities for Blackburn’s sphinx moth and its larval host plant tree tobacco prior to work initiation. o Surveys should be conducted within 4-6 weeks prior to construction. o Surveys should include searches for eggs, larvae, and signs of larval feeding (chewed stems, frass, or leaf damage). • If no Blackburn’s sphinx moth are found on the tree tobacco during surveys, it is imperative that measures be taken to avoid attraction of Blackburn’s sphinx moth to the project location and prohibit additional tree tobacco from entering the site. Tree tobacco can grow greater than 3 feet tall in approximately 6 weeks. If it grows over 3 feet, the plants may become a host plant for Blackburn’s sphinx moth. We therefore recommend that you: o Remove any existing tree tobacco less than 3 feet tall. 60 o Monitor the site every 4-6 weeks for new tree tobacco growth before, during and after the proposed ground-disturbing activity and remove all tree tobacco that resprouts before it reaches 3 feet in height. § Monitoring for tree tobacco can be completed by any staff, such as groundskeeper or regular maintenance crew, provided with picture placards of tree tobacco at different life stages. o Soil around tree tobacco smaller than 3 feet may be disturbed after removal. • If tree tobacco is more than 3 feet in height, it is possible that the signs of Blackburn’s sphinx moth foraging have been shed and pupating larvae may be in the ground in the area beneath the plant(s). Therefore, if there are no signs of Blackburn’s sphinx moth on tree tobacco more than 3 feet in height, the above- ground portion of the plant(s) may be cut off and removed and the following measures implemented to minimize the potential for future use of the plant by Blackburn’s sphinx moth and potential impact to a pupae that may already be in the soil near the plant: o Treat stems with herbicide or re-trim to prevent leaf growth and potential use by Blackburn’s sphinx moth. o A 33-ft (10-m) buffer should be established around the plant’s location for three months assuming a heavy rain event occurs. If no heavy rains occur, then this period should be extended for six months until rains do occur. After this period, the plant roots may be removed and the soil disturbed. • If additional Blackburn’s sphinx moth eggs or larvae are found, notify the Service biologist … to coordinate on avoiding take. Hawaiian waterbirds Hawaiian waterbirds are currently found in a variety of wetland habitats including freshwater marshes and ponds, coastal estuaries and ponds, artificial reservoirs, Colocasia esculenta (kalo or taro) loʻi or patches, irrigation ditches, sewage treatment ponds. Hawaiian stilts may also be found wherever ephemeral or persistent standing water may occur. Threats to these species include nonnative predators, habitat loss, and habitat degradation. Based on the project details provided, your project may result in the creation of standing water or open water that could attract Hawaiian waterbirds to the project site. In particular, the Hawaiian stilt is known to nest in sub-optimal locations (e.g., any ponding water), if water is present. Hawaiian waterbirds attracted to sub-optimal habitat may suffer adverse impacts, such as predation and reduced reproductive success, and thus the project may create an attractive nuisance. Therefore, we recommend you work with our office during project planning so that we may assist you in developing measures to avoid impacts to listed species (e.g., fencing, vegetation control, predator management). To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian waterbirds we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plan: • In areas where waterbirds are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. • If water resources are located within or adjacent to the project site, incorporate applicable best management practices regarding work in aquatic environments into the project design (see enclosed Aquatic Best Management Practices). 61 • Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species’ biology conduct Hawaiian waterbird nest surveys where appropriate habitat occurs within the vicinity of the proposed project site prior to project initiation. Repeat surveys again within 3 days of project initiation and after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). If a nest or active brood is found: o Contact the Service within 48 hours for further guidance. o Establish and maintain a 100-ft buffer around all active nests and/or broods until the chicks have fledged. Do not conduct potentially disruptive activities or habitat alteration within this buffer. o Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species’ biology present on the project site during all construction or earth moving activities until the chicks fledge to ensure that Hawaiian waterbirds and nests are not adversely impacted. Hawaiian hawk The Hawaiian hawk was recently federally delisted but remains a listed species under Hawaiʻi State law. The Hawaiian hawk is known to occur across a broad range of forest habitats throughout the island of Hawaiʻi. Loud, irregular and unpredictable activities, such as using heavy equipment or building a structure, near an endangered Hawaiian hawk nest may cause nest failure. Harassment of Hawaiian hawk nesting sites can alter feeding and breeding patterns or result in nest or chick abandonment. Nest disturbance can also increase exposure of chicks and juveniles to inclement weather or predators. To avoid and minimize impacts to Hawaiian hawks we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plan: • If work must be conducted between March 1 through September 30, during the Hawaiian hawk breeding season, have a biologist familiar with the species conduct a nest search of the project footprint and surrounding areas immediately prior to the start of construction activities. o Pre-disturbance surveys for Hawaiian hawks are only valid for 14 days. If disturbance for the specific location does not occur within 14 days of the survey, conduct another survey. • Clearing of vegetation or construction activities should not occur within 1,600 ft of any active Hawaiian hawk nest during the breeding season until the young have fledged. • Regardless of the time of year, avoid trimming or cutting trees containing a hawk nest, as nests may be re-used during consecutive breeding seasons. Other Measures to Reduce Mortality of Listed Animal Species Additional measures for housing developments common to all listed animal species that will reduce mortality or predation include the following: • Post and enforce low speed limits to reduce vehicle collisions with wildlife. • Require all pets, including cats and dogs, to be on leash at all times outside. • Require garbage cans with lids to reduce populations of rats and mongoose, which are invasive species and prey upon native and endangered species. • Provide signage instructing residents and visitors to avoid approaching, feeding, or disturbing wildlife. Recommendations provided by the State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife include: 62 ● stop work of all activities within 100 feet (30 meters), ● do not approach the bird, ● work may continue if the bird leaves of its own accord, ● if a nest is discovered, to contact the Division of Forestry and Wildlife, and ● minimizing predator (cat, rodent, mongoose) presence by o removal of the predators, and/or o providing covered trash receptacles, and/or o placing bait stations. ● Minimize disturbance during bat birthing and pup rearing season between June 1 through September 15 or not disturbing woody plants greater than 15 feet tall without consultation with the Division of Forestry and Wildlife. ● For nighttime lighting that might be required, DOFAW recommends that all lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. ● The Division of Forestry and Wildlife also recommends using native plant species for landscaping and not using invasive plant species. ● In addition, minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites, such as in fill, to reduce the spread of invasive fungal pathogens, vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants), or invasive plant parts that could harm native species and ecosystems. Mitigative measures above will be implemented during the proposed project. In addition, the project workers will be educated on identification of the above species and will stop work to determine the best course of action for completion. Biological consultation will be performed if any of the above species are observed at the property. 5.1.5 Wetlands Alternative 1 No significant adverse impacts to wetlands are anticipated by implementing Alternative I, as the Site would remain undeveloped Alternative II No significant adverse impacts are anticipated under Alternative II. Alternative II, the Proposed Action, would not result in loss or destruction of existing wetland resources as there are no designated wetlands near the site. 5.1.6 Water Resources Alternative I 63 No significant adverse impacts to groundwater or surface water would result under Alternative I, the no action alternative. Site conditions would remain the same. Alternative II No significant adverse impacts are anticipated to groundwater resources assuming implementation of Alternative II, the Proposed Action. Hazardous substances that could adversely affect groundwater are not likely to be introduced or released into the soil given the proposed use of the Site as housing. No significant impact to surface water near the Site is anticipated because of construction operations associated with Alternative II as there is no streams or surface water bodies at the Site. Potable water calculations are being determined at this time with the finalization of fixture types/counts through the building design process. However, potable water estimates based on the unit count (64 units) and unit type (2, 3, and 4 bedrooms) were used by Imata & Associates, Inc. The amount of water determined to be necessary for the development was estimated at 29,890 gallons per day. An existing water commitment expired on January 31, 2016 for a previous proposed development for the Site. Water is available from an existing eight (8) inch waterline within Kapiolani Street fronting TMK (3) 2-4-025:080. There are no existing services to the subject parcels. The Hawaii County Department of Water Supply can issue a water commitment if the conditions and standards are met and an application is submitted. Waste water calculations are being determined at this time with the finalization of fixture types/counts through the building design process. Waste water estimates based on the unit count (64 units) and unit type (2, 3, and 4 bedroom) were used by Imata & Associates, Inc. The amount of waste water generated by the development was estimated at 12,544 gallons per day. The Site is not located on a Sole-Source aquifer. No significant impact to surface water near the Site is anticipated as a result of construction or operations associated with Alternative II as there are no streams or surface water bodies at the Site. There are no designated wild and scenic rivers in the State of Hawaii. An NPDES permit may need to be obtained for point source water pollutant discharges into State Surface waters (HAR, Chapter 11-55). Point source means any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance from which pollutants are or may be discharged. An onsite drainage system will be constructed to accommodate runoff generated by a 50-year storm for one (1) hour for a fully developed site. This system will divert site waters to dry wells installed on the property. The drainage and dry wells are intended to prevent significant flooding and migration off property of site waters. Onsite and Offsite drainage were studied. Reports were provided to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The studies found that proposed culvert conditions would decrease adverse impacts or additional ponding. The installation of drywells would decrease runoff from the site compared to existing conditions. The system will be constructed in accordance with the County rules for the design of storm drainage facilities and to ensure that there are no adverse impacts to adjacent and downtown stream properties. 64 5.1.7 Climate and Air Quality Alternative I Alternative I would not have a significant adverse impact to air quality as the existing conditions would remain unchanged. Alternative II Under Alternative II, potentially significant adverse impacts to air quality from earth moving and excavation activities during construction activities (i.e., fugitive dust emissions) are anticipated. Temporary increases in traffic during the construction phase of Alternative II are also anticipated to increase emissions from combustion as well as increase fugitive dust. Adequate dust control measures, in compliance with Section 11-60. 1-33, “Fugitive Dust”, of HAR will be implemented during all phases of construction. A best management practices (i.e., watering of roads and trenches during project activities, use of a dust screen which surrounds the project area) would reduce any impacts to less than significant. Once project construction is complete, impacts to air quality would not be significant. Due to proximity of airport to the project site location; fumes, odors, and smoke may result from aircraft flight operations. Prospective occupants will be made aware of the potential for these to occur. 5.1.8 Noise Alternative I No significant adverse impacts to noise are expected to occur under Alternative I. Site conditions would remain unchanged. Alternative II No significant noise disturbance is anticipated, as the properties immediately surrounding the Site are undeveloped. HDOH Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 46, “Community Noise Control” regulations and CFR 24 CFR Subpart B – Noise Abatement and Control will be complied with for the duration of the project. Construction activities at the Site may increase noise levels, then a noise permit will be obtained. No industrial processes or activities that would contribute to a significant adverse impact to the noise environment are planned under Alternative II. Once the project is completed, no significant increases in noise are anticipated. While overall noise levels would increase due to a rise in area population, increases would only be observed as modest increases in vehicular traffic, mechanical noise (i.e. air conditioning) and voice load. No industrial processes or activities that would contribute to a significant adverse impact of the noise environment are planned under Alternative II. 65 Due to proximity of airport to the project site location; excessive single event noise may result from aircraft flight operations. Prospective occupants will be made aware of the potential for this to occur. 5.1.9 Solid Waste Alternative I No significant adverse impacts to solid waste are expected to occur under Alternative I. Site conditions would remain unchanged. Alternative II Construction activities at the Site will increase solid waste and construction wastes. Waste generated by site preparation will primarily consist of vegetation, rocks, and debris from clearing, grubbing, and grading. Very little demolition material is expected, as the site is essentially vacant. These wastes will be minimized by proper planning of building materials and recycling efforts. A solid waste management plan will be coordinated with the County’s Solid Waste Division for the disposal of onsite and construction-related waste material. Once the project is completed, solid waste generation will be increased over the current conditions. However, West Hawaii Sanitary landfill South Hilo Sanitary landfill will have adequate capacity to accommodate waste generated from the proposed project. Future planning for waste on the island of Hawaii is being evaluated for the long-term. This increase in waste generation would not contribute to a significant adverse impact under Alternative II. There are three facilities nearby that manage solid waste. In addition, the proposed project will support programs that encourage waste reduction, recycling, and other green/environmentally friendly practice. 5.1.10 Hazardous Waste Alternative I No significant adverse impacts to solid waste are expected to occur under Alternative I. Site conditions would remain unchanged. Alternative II Construction activities at the Site will increase hazardous wastes. These wastes can be minimized by pre-construction proper planning. Existing potentially hazardous wastes would be removed during construction activities. Once the project is completed, household hazardous waste (e.g., batteries, paints, cleaners, etc.) generation will be increased over the current conditions. This increase in waste generation would not contribute to a significant adverse impact under Alternative II. There are three facilities nearby that manage solid waste. 66 5.2 Social Environment 5.2.1 Land Use Considerations and Zoning Alternative I Alternative I would have a direct adverse impact to land use and zoning. The Site is currently undeveloped but is zoned RM 1.5 Multi-Family Dwelling Units. The No Action Alternative would not be utilizing the land to its fullest potential. Alternative II Alternative II would have a significant beneficial impact on land use and zoning. Consistency with its zoning designation would make available additional rental housing for low income families. 5.2.2 Archaeological and Cultural Considerations Alternative I No significant adverse impacts are anticipated under Alternative I. Site conditions would remain the same. Alternative II Alternative II would involve ground disturbing activities that may adversely impact historical and archaeological resources. However, these impacts are considered unlikely. The area surrounding the Site has no history of archeological resources. The archeological surveys conducted in 2006 and 2019 did not reveal any cultural, historic, or natural resources, or practices and beliefs concerning the project area. A Cultural Impact Assessment in 2019 determined that though there have been numerous discoveries of archaeological sites in the Hilo area, previous archaeological studies conducted in the project area revealed no traditional Hawaiian archaeological sites were present. The reconnaissance survey determined that no rock outcrops that could signal the presence of caves were encountered. Because of an absence of archaeological sites in the project area, it is recommended that a determination of “no historic properties affected” be considered for the proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development Project. SHPD concurred with the “no historic properties affected” determination. If human osteological remains or a potential archaeological site are uncovered during construction activities, mitigation measures will be implemented. Specifically, site work will cease and the Hawaii State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) would be contacted in compliance with Chapter 6E of the HRS. These mitigation measures will be implemented. These mitigation measures will ensure no loss or destruction of historic and archaeological resources, avoid adverse impacts to potential sites, and ensure compliance with State laws and regulations. Implementation 67 of mitigation measures would reduce any potential impacts associated with Alternative II to less than significant. 5.2.3 Transportation Alternative I No significant adverse impacts are anticipated under Alternative I. Site conditions would remain the same. Alternative II No significant adverse impacts are anticipated under Alternative II. The Site is located in an area that serves mostly local traffic and is surrounded by unsignalized intersections. North of the Site is the County of Hawaii Police Department and a shopping center. Directly east of the Site is Saint Joseph’s School, and further west of the site is Hilo Elementary and Hilo High School. South and west of the Site is residential area. The primary traffic affected would be the nearby schools. However, traffic in the area is believed to increase on its own in the near future due to the construction of more shops and businesses near the Site. Traffic at these areas operates at a LOS of C or better. Projected traffic in the year 2021 showed a slightly worsening of traffic conditions operating at a LOS of D or better during the PM peak hour. Both Site access intersections are anticipated to operate with all movements at LOS B or better during both peak hours. Based on the TIAR projections, the proposed project’s 64 multi-family residential units will generate a total of 32 vehicular trips during the AM peak hours of traffic, and 40 vehicular trips during the PM peak hours of traffic. The TIAR did not provide projections during the construction period for the Site. While there are no significant adverse impacts anticipated under Alternative II for the airport, the airport may pose adverse impacts for the Site. The Site is located outside the 55 Day-Night Average Sound Levels area for the Hilo International Airport. However, residents should be aware of the proximity of the airport and potential single event noise from aircraft operations. The use of PV (normally used for common areas and offices) will also not be allowed for the Site due to its proximity to the airport, which could mean higher electricity costs for the project owner. 5.2.4 Social Factors and Community Identity Alternative I Alternative I would have no impact to the social and community identity. Site conditions would remain unchanged. Alternative II Construction of housing for low income households is expected to have a significant beneficial impact on the social and community identity of the area. If the proposed project is not completed, 68 the property would remain vacant and unused for an undetermined amount of time. The proposed project will add residential units to the district and assist families who would otherwise have few, if any, options for affordable housing in the area. Also, the project will incorporate a non-profit service that coordinates with community-based organizations to deliver programs and services that address health, education, employment, childcare, financial fitness and safety. 5.2.5 Recreational and Public Facilities Alternative I No significant impacts are anticipated under Alternative I. Site conditions would remain unchanged. Alternative II Alternative II is expected to have no significant adverse impact on the recreational and public facilities on the island. The proposed development plans on having an onsite playground, with open areas and spaces to gather, including a picnic area. This is in addition to the onsite community meeting room that will be constructed. The construction of the Site is not expected to impact nearby existing recreational facilities, such as golf courses, parks, and beaches. 5.2.6 Visual and Aesthetic Resources Alternative I There would be no significant adverse impact on the visual resources and aesthetics in or around the project area anticipated with Alternative I, as this alternative shall not bring about any changes in the existing conditions. Alternative II Significant adverse impacts to visual resources are not expected under Alternative II. Construction of the new housing complex will not significantly impact the view of adjacent buildings, as the buildings will only be two stories tall, and the area is all relatively flat. Significant public views will also not be affected. The project location is set back from the main street and would not obstruct the view. 5.2.7 Infrastructure Systems and Utilities Alternative I No significant adverse impacts are anticipated under Alternative I. Site conditions would remain unchanged. Alternative II 69 Alternative II is expected to have minimal impact on the infrastructure and utilities in and around the project area. Water, sewer, and electricity services are expected to be supplied by the same service providers used within the area. The addition of the 64-unit dwellings will not tax the current supply. An onsite drainage system, constructed in accordance with the County rules for the design of storm drainage facilities, will be constructed to accommodate generated runoff. Waste diversion will be implemented during the proposed project construction and operation. In addition, the proposed project will have a Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) consultant throughout our design and construction of the project to minimize waste and optimize utilization of resources. There is currently no sewer main on the Site. The closest sewer main is located on Kukuau Street, which the developer would have to pump sewer up to an elevation and allow it to gravity into the Kukuau Street collector. Students living in the proposed project will attend Hilo Elementary, Hilo Intermediate, and Hilo High Schools. Both Hilo Elementary and Intermediate schools have capacity, while Hilo High is over capacity. The number of students that will be generated by the complex is unknown. An inquiry was sent to DOE for an approximate number of students that would be generated by this proposed project, but there has been no response to this inquiry yet. Based on the types of units proposed, it is estimated up to 100 children of varying ages maybe residing at the Site. Hilo Elementary and Hilo Intermediate should have minimal impacts as there is capacity at those locations. Hilo High is reported at over capacity which will be further strained with the introduction of additional students. Impacts to educational facilities are anticipated, the developer will work with the Hawai'i Department of Education (DOE) to address and mitigate project impacts. 5.3 Cumulative Impacts Cumulative effects are not anticipated as a result of implementing Alternatives I or II. The actions themselves do not involve a commitment to larger actions. The alternatives will likely not result in substantial secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Alternative I will effect no change to the project area, Alternative II involves the construction of a 64-unit housing facility. Population changes or effects on public facilities would be minimal. The addition of an estimated 180 individuals would minimally add to the existing population of 43,263 for the area (0.4% increase in the population). The change in population and demand for public facilities would be readily met by existing infrastructure. 70 SECTION 6 RELATIONSHIP TO PLANS, POLICIES, AND CONTROLS The purpose of Section 6 is to identify plans and policies that may be applicable to this project and summarize the relationship of the plans and policies to project actions. Additionally, the intent is to revisit these plans and policies to qualify any significant effects from actions proposed in this EA. 6.1 State and County Land Use Plans and Policies 6.1.1 State Land Use Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statues, relating to the Land Use Commission (LUC), establishes four (4) major land use districts in which all lands in the state are placed. These districts are designated as Urban, Rural, Agricultural, and Conservation. The parcel proposed for development is located in an Urban district. 6.1.2 County Zoning County of Hawaii, Planning Division, indicates the Site Land Use Ordinance Zoning Designation is Multi-Family Dwelling Units (RM 1.5). The Site is not located in a Special District or Special Management Area. 6.1.3 Hawaii State Plan Chapter 226, HRS, also known as the Hawaii State Plan, is a long-range comprehensive plan that serves as a guide for the future long-range development of the State by identifying goals, objectives, policies, and priorities, as well as implementation mechanisms. The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani housing development is in accordance with the following goals of the Hawaii State Plan: ● A strong, viable economy, characterized by stability, diversity, and growth, that enables the fulfillment of the needs and expectations of Hawaii’s present and future generations ● A desired physical environment, characterized by beauty, cleanliness, quiet, stable natural systems, and uniqueness, that enhances the mental and physical well-being of the people. ● Physical, social, and economic well-being, for individuals and families in Hawaii, that nourishes a sense of community responsibility, of caring, and of participation in community life. The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani housing development is in conformance with the following objectives and policies of the Hawaii State Plan: Chapter 226-5, HRS, Objective and Policies for Population 226-5(b)(1), HRS: Manage population growth statewide in a manner that provides increased opportunities for Hawaii’s people to pursue their physical, social, and economic aspirations while recognizing the unique needs of each county. 226-5(b)(3), HRS: Promote increased opportunities for Hawaii’s people to pursue their socio- economic aspirations throughout the islands. 71 Chapter 226-6, HRS, Objectives and Policies for the Economy – in General 226-6(b)(6), HRS: Strive to achieve a level of construction activity responsive to, and consistent with, State growth objectives. Chapter 226-11, HRS, Objective sand Policies for the Physical Environment – Land Based, Shoreline, and Marine Resource 226-11(b)(3), HRS: Take into account the physical attributes of areas when planning and designing activities and facilities. 226-11(b)(8), HRS: Pursue compatible relationships among activities, facilities, and natural resources. Chapter 226-13, Hawaii Revised Statutes, Objectives and Policies for the Physical Environment – Land, Air, and Water Quality 226-13(b)(6), HRS: Encourage design and construction practices that enhance the physical qualities of Hawaii’s communities. 226-13(b)(7), HRS: Encourage urban developments in close proximity to existing services and facilities. Chapters 226-19, HRS, Objectives and Policies for Socio-Cultural Advancement – Housing 226-19(a)(2), HRS: The orderly development of residential areas sensitive to community needs and other land uses. 226-19(b)(1), HRS: Effectively accommodate the housing needs of Hawaii’s people. 226-19(b)(3), HRS: Increase home ownership and rental opportunities and choices in terms of quality, location, cost, densities, style, and size of housing. 226-19(b)(5), HRS: Promote design and location of housing developments taking into account the physical setting. Accessibility to public facilities and services, and other concerns of existing communities and surrounding areas. 226-19(b)(7), HRS: Foster a variety of lifestyles traditional to Hawaii through the design and maintenance of neighborhoods that reflect the culture and values of the community The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani housing development complies with the following priority guidelines of the Hawaii State Plan: Chapter 226-103, HRS, Economic Priority Guidelines 226-103(1), HRS: Seek a variety of means to increase the availability of investment capital of new and expanding enterprises 226-103(1)(a), HRS: Encourage investments which: (i) Reflect long-term commitments to the State; (ii) Rely on economic linkages within the local economy; (iii) Diversity the economy; (iv) Reinvest in the local economy; (v) Are sensitive to community needs and priorities; and (vi) Demonstrate a commitment to management opportunities to Hawaii residents. Chapter 226-104, HRS, Population Growth and Land Resources Priority Guidelines 226-104(a)(1), HRS: Encourage planning and resource management to ensure that population growth rates throughout the State are consistent with available planned resource capacities and reflect the needs and desires of Hawaii’s people. 226-104(b)(1), HRS: Encourage urban growth primarily to existing urban areas where adequate public facilities are already available or can be provided with reasonable public expenditures and 72 away from areas where other important benefits are present, such as protection of important agricultural land or preservation of lifestyles. 226-104(b)(2), HRS: Make available marginal or non-essential agricultural lands for appropriate urban uses while maintaining agricultural lands of importance in the agricultural district. 226-104(b)(12), HRS: Utilize Hawaii’s limited land resources wisely, providing adequate land to accommodate projected population and economic growth needs while ensuring the protection of the environment and the availability of the shoreline conservation lands, and other limited resources for future generations. The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani housing development is consistent with the State Housing Functional Plan: State Housing Functional Plan 2017 Objective A: Increase and sustain the supply of permanent rental housing that is affordable and accessible to Hawaii residents, particularly those with incomes at or below 60% AMI. 6.1.4 Hilo Community Development Plan The County of Hawaii General Plan section 15.1 (February 2005, as amended) calls for the preparation of community development plans (CDP) “to translate the broad General Plan statements to specific actions as they apply to specific geographical areas.” The General Plan requires CDPs be adopted as an “ordinance”, giving the plans force of law. This is a long-term plan with a planning horizon to year 2020, consistent with the General Plan. The Hilo CDP was prepared by the Hilo Community with the assistance of The County of Hawaii Planning Department and Townscape, Inc. It was adopted in 1975. The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Proposed Housing Development is in accordance with the following CDP Plan objectives: ● Planning and development of future land use taking into consideration environmental assets such as vegetation, important views, attractive rivers, interesting shoreline and protected bay, and environmental constraints, such as recurring tsunamis, earthquakes, flooding and volcanic activity. ● Development of residential areas of various densities distributed on the basis of their relationship to the city center, transportation facilities and other infrastructure and with sufficient expansion acreage for an approximate ten-year period, and with alternative or additional expansion areas indicated to provide flexibility to the County and developers. ● Identification of housing improvements needed by planning area and designation of priority improvement areas. 6.2 Necessary Permits and Approvals The following approvals may be required for the implementation of the project. All approvals will be obtained in accordance with approving agency guidelines. 6.2.1 State of Hawaii (a) Chapter 343, HRS, environmental review (b) Department of Health 73 ● Chapter 46, HAR – noise permit, as required. ● Chapter 11-23, HAR – Underground Injection Control permit for the use of drainage injection wells to handle discharges of storm water runoff. ● Chapter 11-55, HAR – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for construction stormwater discharges. (c) Chapter 6E, HRS, State Historic Preservation Division, as required. 6.2.2 County of Hawaii (a) Conditional Use Permit, as required. (b) Building Permits for infrastructure improvements. (c) Grading Permits for earthwork activities associated with infrastructure improvements. (d) Part 50 and 58 Environmental Review with HTF Environmental Provisions under 24 CFR 93.301(f)(1) – The proposed project will be combining HOME and HTF funds. Compliance procedures are listed in Appendix D. • Coastal Barrier Resources • Coastal Zone Management • Sole Source Aquifers • Endangered Species • Explosives and Hazards • Environmental Justice 74 SECTION 7 FINDINGS AND REASONS SUPPORTING AGENCY DETERMINATION In accordance with the provisions set forth in Chapter 343, HRS, this EA has preliminarily determined that the project would not have significant adverse impacts on the environment. As such, a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is anticipated for the Proposed Action. Anticipated impacts will be temporary and will not adversely impact the environmental quality of the area. A review of the “Significance Criteria” used as a basis for the above determination is presented below. An action is determined to have a significant impact on the environment if it meets any one of the thirteen (13) criteria. (1) Involves an irrevocable commitment to loss or destruction of any natural or cultural resource; Alternative II would not cause loss or destruction of any natural or cultural resources. The area around the Site is already developed. Archaeological surveys concluded that there would be “no historic properties affected”. Furthermore, the biological survey revealed that there were no threatened or endangered plants or animals on the Site. (2) Curtails the range of beneficial uses of the environment; Alternative II will not curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment. In fact, the implementation of the Proposed Action would increase beneficial uses of the Site by providing affordable housing in an otherwise underutilized area. (3) Conflicts with the State’s long-term environmental policies or goals and guidelines as expressed in Chapter 344, HRS; and any revisions thereof and amendments thereto, court decisions, or executive orders; Alternative II will be in conformance with the Chapter 344, HRS, State Environmental Policy, to enhance the quality of life. The Proposed Action will make available much needed housing for low income households. This is in compliance with the residential zoning status. (4) Substantially affects the economic welfare, social welfare, and cultural practices of the community or State; Alternative II would have beneficial effects to the economic and social welfare of the community and State. The construction phase of the proposed alternatives would create jobs, and the families who occupy the development will generate income for local businesses. The operation of the proposed alternative would assist low income families who may not otherwise receive assistance and offer those families better quality of life. Cultural practices would not be affected. A Cultural Impact Assessment conducted in October 2019 did not reveal any cultural resources, practices and beliefs concerning the project area. SHPD has concurred with the “no historic properties affected” determination. 75 (5) Substantially affects public health; Alternative II will not have significant effects on public health. The Proposed Action would provide safe and sanitary housing within a suitable living environment, which would ensure a better standard of living. (6) Involves substantial secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities; Alternative II will likely not result in substantial secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. The Proposed Action involves the construction of a 64-unit apartment complex. Population changes or effects on public facilities would be minimal. The addition of an estimated 180 individuals would minimally add to the existing population of 43,263 for the area (0.4 % increase in population). The change in population and demand for public facilities would be readily met by existing infrastructure. The addition of school aged children residing at the Site would have minimal impact to Hilo Elementary and Hilo Intermediate Schools. Impacts to Hilo High School are anticipated as the school is over capacity. The developer will work with the Hawai'i DOE to address and mitigate project impacts (7) Involves a substantial degradation of environmental quality; Alternative II is not likely to result in a substantial degradation of environmental quality. Assessment of impacts associated with the Proposed Action have been minimal. (8) Is individually limited but cumulatively has considerable effect on the environment, or involves a commitment for larger actions; Cumulative effects are not anticipated as a result of implementing alternative II. The Proposed Action does not involve a commitment to larger actions. Much of the land near the Site is undeveloped, and the construction of 64 units will have minimal impact to the environment. (9) Substantially affects a rare, threatened, or endangered species, or its habitat; Alternative II is not anticipated to have substantial effects on rare, threatened, or endangered species, or any critical habitat. USFWS identified eight (8) five (5) federally listed species in the vicinity of the project area. There is one (1) State listed species identified. Mitigation measures will be employed as to avoid or minimize any impacts to rare, threatened, or endangered species during and post- construction. There is little potential for encountering such resources as there are no rare, threatened, or endangered species or critical habitats at the Site. (10) Detrimentally affects air or water quality or ambient noise levels; No significant impacts on the area’s long-term air or ambient noise environments are anticipated to result from Alternative II. During the proposed project these parameters will be monitored. Any exceedances in local, state, or federal rules or 76 regulations will be mitigated to minimize their effects to the area. Water quality impacts are not anticipated and do not require mitigation measures. (11) Affects or is likely to suffer damage by being in an environmentally sensitive area such as a flood plain, tsunami zone, beach, erosion-prone area, geologically hazardous land, estuary, freshwater, or coastal water The Site is not located in an environmentally sensitive area, such as a flood plain, tsunami zone, beach, erosion-prone area. Water quality impacts are not anticipated and do not require mitigation measures. (12) Substantially affects scenic vistas and view planes identified in county or state plans or studies; or, Alternative II will not affect the visual aesthetics of the areas identified in the county or state plans and studies. Coastal view planes will not be impacted by the Site. (13) Requires substantial energy consumption. Alternative II would not require substantial energy consumption. The addition of about 180 individuals would minimally add to the existing population of 43,263 for the area (0.4 % increase in population). The change in population and demand for energy would be readily met by existing infrastructure. In addition, energy efficient appliances will be incorporated into the project design. In summary, the proposed project will provide 64 units of much needed affordable family rental housing in Hilo. Based on the foregoing analysis, the proposed action is not anticipated to result in any significant adverse impacts. A FONSI has been determined is anticipated for the proposed project. 77 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 78 SECTION 8 REFERENCES Buchannan-Banks, J.M. 1993a. Geologic Map of the Hilo 7 ½’ Quadrangle, Island of Hawaii. U.S. Geological Survey Report to Accompany Map 1-2274. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/2274/report.pdf County of Hawaii Planning Department. 2005. County of Hawaii General Plan. Accessed July 2019. Retrieved from: http://www.hiplanningdept.com/wp- content/uploads/2014/07/GP2005AmendthruOrd14- 097.pdf County of Hawaii Real Property Tax Office. 2019. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/ http://dlnr.hawaii.gov/dar/regulated-areas/waiakea-public-fishing-area EDR, 2019d. Historical Topographic Map Report, A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani, Hilo, HI 96720, Inquiry Number 5517150.4, February 5, 2019. Environmental Risk Analysis. 2018. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Kaiaulu O Kapiolani, TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080. Google. (n.d.). [Google Maps directions for 343 Kukuau St., Hilo, HI 96720]. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.google.com/maps/place/343+Kukuau+St,+Hilo,+HI+96720/@19.715032,- 155.0893457,17z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x79524b51cdc7f61f:0x3babebbbf0dd9ce a!8m2!3d19.715032!4d-155.087157 Hawaii News Now (HNN). 2016. Report: Rising sea temps likely to bring more cyclones to Hawaii. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: http://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/story/33019216/iucn-experts-rising-seatemperatures- likely-to-bring-more-intense-hurricanes. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2019. What is a tsunami? Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/facts/tsunami.html Nullet, Dennis. (n.d.). Kapiolani Community College Geography, Geography 101 Online. Earthquakes. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: https://laulima.hawaii.edu/access/content/group/2c084cc1-8f08-442b-80e8- ed89faa22c33/book/chapter10/eq.htm Mink, J. F. and S. L. Lau. 1992. Aquifer Identification and Classification for the Island of Hawaii Groundwater Protection Strategy for Hawai‘i. Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, Technical Report No. 186. Escott, G. 2019. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. An Archaeological Assessment Report for a 0.6447-acre Property in Kūkūau 1st Ahupua’a, South Hilo District, Hawaii Island, Hawaii. 79 SSFM International. October 2018.Wailuku River Hydroelectric Facilities Long-Term Water Lease and Waiau Repowering Hilo, Hawaii. Project No. HGA-16-364. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: https://dlnr.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/D-2-EA.pdf State of Hawaii, Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism. 2015. Affordable Rental Housing Report and Ten-Year Plan Special Action Team on Affordable Rental Housing report to the Hawaii State Legislature, in Response to Act 127 (Session Laws of Hawaii 2016). Accessed April 2019. Retrieved from: http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/spb/AffordableRentalHousingReport_10YearPlan.pdf State of Hawaii, Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism. 2015. Measuring Housing Demand in Hawaii, 2015-2025. Accessed February 2017. Retrieved from: http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/economic/reports/2015-05-housing-demand.pdf State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Clean Air Branch. 2016. State of Hawaii Annual Summary 2015 Air Quality Data. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: https://health.hawaii.gov/cab/files/2016/12/aqbook_2015.pdf State of Hawaii, Department of Health, Clean Air Branch. 2019. Fugitive Dust Fact Sheet. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: https://health.hawaii.gov/cab/files/2019/04/Hawaii- Fugitive-Dust-Fact-Sheet-April-2019.pdf State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources. (n.d.). Flood Hazard Assessment Tool. Accessed February 2019. http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT/. State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources. (n.d). Division of Aquatic Resources. Waiakea Public Fishing Area. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources. 2014. County of Hawaii Water Use & Development Plan Update Keauhou Aquifer System. Accessed July 2019. Retrieved from: http://files.hawaii.gov/dlnr/cwrm/submittal/2014/sb20141210I.pdf United States Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Map Service. Accessed April 2019. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (n.d.). Natural Resources Conservation Service. Accessed February 2019. Retrieved from: www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (n.d.) Pacific Southwest, Region 9, Ground Water. Accessed July 2019. Retrieved from: https://archive.epa.gov/region9/water/archive/web/html/ssa.html United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2012. National Wetlands Inventory. Accessed April 2019. Retrieved from: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html 80 Wright, Chun, & Exposo et. al., 2011. USGS. Map Showing Lava-Flow Hazard Zones, Island of Hawaii. Accessed July, 2019. Retrieved from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/mf/1992/2193/ 81 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. APPENDIX A THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. 82 SECTION 9 AGENCIES AND ORGANIZATIONS The following agencies and organizations were contacted during the pre-consultation and during the 30-day comment period. Pre-consultation, comment letters, and response letters have been reproduced and included in Appendix A, Exhibit 17. Federal Agencies U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service** Department of the Navy, Pacific Division Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX Pacific Islands Federal Aviation Administration Federal Highways Administration Federal Transit Administration Natural Resources Conservation Service National Marine Fisheries Service National Parks Service National Resources Conservation Service US Army Corps of Engineers US Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security State Agencies Department of Accounting and General Services (DAGS) Department of Agriculture Department of Business Economic Development & Tourism (DBEDT) DBEDT, State Office of Planning DBEDT, Strategic Industries Division Department of Defense, Emergency Management/Civil Defense Department of Hawaiian Home Lands 83 Department of Education Department of Land & Natural Resources DLNR, Land Division* ** DLNR SHPD DLNR Division of Forestry and Wildlife** DLNR Engineering Division** Department of Transportation* ** Hawaii Department of Health, Wastewater Branch HDOH, Clean Water Branch* HDOH, Environmental Health Administration HDOH, Environmental Planning Office HDOH, Wastewater Branch Office of Hawaiian Affairs University of Hawaii, Environmental Center University of Hawaii, Marine Program University of Hawaii, Capital Improvement University of Hawaii, Water resources Research Center County Agencies Department Board of Water Supply* ** Department of Planning and Permitting* Department of Transportation Services County of Hawaii Fire Department** County of Hawaii Police Department County of Hawaii Department of Public Works** 84 County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management* County of Hawaii Postmaster Other Hawaii Electric Light Company Office of Representative Valerie T. Poindexter Office of Senator Brian Schatz State Senator Kalali’i Kahele State Representative Mark Nakashima Mr. Peter Vana, Trustee** Mr. David Panoff** Ms. Patricia Tummons** *Indicates a comment letter was received prior to completion of the Draft EA document. **Indicates a comment letter was received during the Draft EA comment period. 85 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. D e v e l o p m e n t U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 451 Seventh Street, SW Washington, DC 20410 www.hud.gov espanol.hud.gov Environmental Assessment Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD-assisted Projects 24 CFR Part 58 Project Information Project Name: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Proposed Housing Development Responsible Entity: County of Hawaii, Mayor Grant Recipient: A0705 Hilo, LP State/Local Identifier: Hilo, Hawaii (Hawaii Island) Preparer: Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC Certifying Officer Name and Title: Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): Consultant (if applicable): Direct Comments to: Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 Project Location: The proposed development site is located in the state of Hawaii, at property tax map keys (TMKs) (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080. The Site is located on Kapiolani Street between Kukuau Street and Hualalai Street. It encompasses 5.05 acres of land situated in Hilo on the east side of the island of Hawaii. This location is currently zoned for apartments. Description of Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]: A0705 Hilo, L.P. is proposing to develop an affordable rental complex of 64 units in Hilo, consisting of 32 two- bedroom units, 24 three-bedroom units, and 8 four-bedroom units. The project will consist of 64 newly-constructed units, comprised of 2-bedroom, 3-bedroom, and 4-bedroom units in two-story apartment buildings. In addition to the residential buildings there will also be a community center, laundry facilities, tot lot, community gardens, and open spaces. The project anticipates providing at least 1.5 parking stalls per residential unit. The project does not anticipate the use of federal funds for infrastructure improvements. The objective of this project is to produce an affordable rental development, while utilizing the least amount of State of Hawaii resources. These apartments will target low income households earning 60 percent or less of the Area Median Income (AMI) for the County of Hawai‘i. These units will address the dire need for affordable rentals for the households in this income bracket, many of whom are at risk of becoming homeless due to the severe housing shortage. The HHFDC Consolidated Plan outlines the planned project schedule. The construction start date is proposed to be in first quarter 2022. The last building by fourth quarter 2023. Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]: The purpose of the Proposed Action is to develop an affordable rental development, while utilizing the least amount of State of Hawaii resources. These units will address the dire need for affordable housing on the island of Hawaii, for many residents who are at risk of becoming homeless due to the severe housing shortage. The Office of the Governor of Hawaii has expressed a specific need to create additional affordable housing for the very low income to moderate income households. The Hawaii State Legislature has also recognized this need by passing legislation that has increased monies to funds such as the Rental Housing Trust Fund for financing to build affordable rental housing units. The Department of Business, Economic Development & tourism (DBEDT) projects a population increase in Hawaii County of 29% by 2025. This would result in a total demand of between 19,600 and 20,100 additional housing units for Hawaii County by 2025 (DBEDT, 2015). In May 2015, the HHFDC adopted the Consolidated Plan for funding through the HOME Investment Partnership Program (HOME), the Housing Opportunities for persons with AIDS Program (HOPWA), and the Emergency Solutions Grant Program (ESG). The application to HUD will fund the Counties of Maui, Hawaii, and Kauai (HHFDC, Consolidated Plan Information Packet). The County of Hawaii 2020-2024 Consolidated Plan noted that housing demand would increase and a total of 13,300 units would be needed in the years 2020 through 2025. The proposed project will directly address goals and priorities identified in the County of Hawaii’s Consolidated Plan for Program Years 2020 through 2024. The proposed project directly addresses the goal to “construct 3 new affordable rental projects for extremely low, low and moderate income households” and the high priorities of “housing” and “infrastructure Improvements.” The proposed project will serve tenants earning up to 30%, 40%, 50%, and 60% of area median income, will create new housing units, and will improve a drainage area within a County easement on the property. Existing Conditions and Trends [24 CFR 58.40(a)]: The property is currently unpaved and undeveloped with heavy wooded vegetation covering the entire parcel. Surrounding the Site is developed residential area. Aerial photographs from 2013 depicts the area as it is today with a police station directly northeast of the Site. The Site is located approximately a mile away from Hilo Elementary School, Hilo High School, and several other schools. Wailoa River State Recreational Area is located less than two miles from the Site. Within two miles of the Site are several small shops. Grocery stores, drug stores, coffee shops, and restaurants. Two beachfront hotels and a golf course are located approximately two miles from the Site. If the proposed project is not completed, the property would remain vacant and unused for an undetermined amount of time. This would neither benefit the residents of the island of Hawaii nor fulfill the purpose of the land use zoning ordinance. Funding Information Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount: The total is $12,800,000 $1,500,000. However, as of today, no funding from this source has taken place. Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non-HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)]: The total is $53,888,000 $46,400,000. This includes STATE RHRF of $12,800,000 $1,5000.000, permanent loan of $601,297 $5,340,000, $23,505,010 $20,963,296 of private equity from the sale of federal tax credits, $8,681,693 $7,292,310 of private equity from the sale of state tax credits, and $2,300,000 $4,394 Deferred Developer Fee. This project also includes Section 8 project-based vouchers. Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities Record below the compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, executive order, or regulation. Provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where applicable, complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note applicable permits of approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references. Attach additional documentation as appropriate. Compliance Factors: Statutes, Executive Orders, and Regulations listed at 24 CFR § 58.5 and § 58.6 Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Compliance determinations STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 AND 58.6 Airport Hazards 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D Yes No A site visit confirmed the Project Area is not within 2,500 feed from the end of a runway at a civil airport or 15,000 feet from the end of a runway at a military airfield. Site visit was conducted by Max Ulloa of Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC on February 10, 2019. Due to the proximity of the Hilo Airport, PV cells will not be able to be utilized at the proposed project Please see Exhibit 1. http://aviation.hawaii.gov/airfields-airports/hawaii/ Coastal Barrier Resources Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as amended by the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 [16 USC 3501] Yes No Not within a coastal zone. There are no streams or surface features at the Site. The nearest water bodies are the Pacific Ocean to the northeast and Wailoa Pond to the east, used for recreational fishing. Please see Exhibit 2. https://www.fws.gov/CBRA/Maps/Mapper.html https://www.fws.gov/cbra/ Flood Insurance Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 and National Flood Insurance Yes No Flood insurance is not required because the project location lies beyond the 500-year flood plain, within Flood Zone X. Refer to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). Please see Exhibit 3. X X X Reform Act of 1994 [42 USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC 5154a] http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT/ STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CRF 50.4 & 58.5 Clean Air Clean Air Act, as amended, particularly section 176(c) & (d); 40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93 Yes No The Hawaii State Department of Health (HDOH) maintains air monitoring locations throughout the state. Air quality in the state is most affected by proximity to the volcano. Monitoring stations with communities near the volcano (Island of Hawaii) record higher levels of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and particulate matter at 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5), with regular exceedances of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for SO2 and occasional exceedances of the NAAQS for PM2.5. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) considers the volcano a natural, uncontrollable event, therefore the state requests attainment/non-attainment determination. Excluding the exceedances due to the volcano, in 2015 the State of Hawaii was in attainment of all NAAQS. (HDOH Annual Summary 2015 Air Quality Data). The Hilo area is currently in attainment of all criteria pollutants established by the Clean Air Act, State Ambient Air Quality Standards (SAAQS, and NAAQS. Please see Exhibit 4. http://health.hawaii.gov/cab/ Coastal Zone Management Coastal Zone Management Act, sections 307(c) & (d) Yes No The Site is not located in a tsunami evacuation zone. The County of Hawaii, Evacuation Zone Map (2019) for the area is presented as EA Figure 15 Please see Exhibit 5. https://tsunami.coast.noaa.gov/#/ Contamination and Toxic Substances 24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2) Yes No According to a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated February 2019, and a subsequent reconnaissance visit on February 10, 2019, the subject Site was not listed on any of the databases searched by Environmental Data Resources (EDR), which provides a review of federal, state, and local lists and available files of reported hazardous waste sites and hazardous substance/petroleum product sources and releases. The ESA did not identify any American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) defined Recognized Environmental X X X Conditions (RECs) for the subject Site. ASTM proximity search guidelines were used to evaluate properties near the Site. There are no underground storage tanks (USTs) located on the Site, or on properties adjacent to the Site. No leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites were located directly adjacent to the Site. A search of the HDOH UST Branch database records (dated 08/31/2018) resulted in eleven (11) sites having reported a UST release within a ½-mile radius of the Site. According to the HDOH LUST database, of the 11 LUST sites, nine (9) sites are recorded as Site Cleanup Completed and were issued a No Further Action (NFA). The LUST sites do not pose an environmental threat to the subject Site. Please see Exhibit 6. Endangered Species Endangered Species Act of 1972, particularly section 7; 50 CFR Part 402 Yes No There are no endangered or threatened species, no candidates listed as endangered or threatened species, or any critical habitat for any such species known to occur on the Site. Please see Exhibit 7. Explosive and Flammable Hazards 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart C Yes No Research regarding historical land use was conducted to determine any RECs at the Site and if the surrounding area may have impacted the Site. No RECs were found at the Site, and it is not believed that previous uses of the Site will affect surrounding areas. During previous site reconnaissance, no explosive or hazardous materials were observed. Please see Exhibit 8. Farmlands Protection Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981, particularly sections 1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658 Yes No The County of Hawaii, Planning Division, indicates the Site Land Use Ordinance Zoning Designation is Multi-Family Dwelling Units (RM 1.5). The Site is not located in a Special District or Special Management Area. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service Classifies the soil within the 100% Keaukaha-Urban land complex. It is classified as Hydrologic Soil Group D with a typical profile consisting of highly decomposed plant material from 0 to 4 inches below ground surface (bgs), and lithic bedrock from 4 to 14 inches bgs. The soils have high runoff class, which indicates they are well drained. The depth of groundwater is more than 80 inches (USDA, 2019). Please see Exhibit 9. X X X Floodplain Management Executive Order 11988, particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR Part 55 Yes No According to FEMA FIRM Map No. 1551660736F, it was determined that the Site lies beyond the 500-year flood plain (within Flood Zone X). Please see Exhibit 10. Historic Preservation National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, particularly sections 106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800 Yes No Two surveys were conducted of the project parcels. Nelson, Clark, and Rechtman conducted an AIS of parcels 048 and 053 in 2006 and in 2019. An AIS of parcel 080 was conducted by Glen and Suzan Escott in 2019. No evidence of prehistoric or historic sites or features was observed during the field surveys. No areas of cultural significance were identified during consultation with locals or during the literature review. SHPD has concurred with the “no historic properties affected” determination. An Archaelogical Field Inspection was conducted in September 2020 by ASM Affiliates. A 100% surface inspection was performed of the entire parcel. No lava blisters or historic properties were observed. ASM recommended a “no historic properties affected” determination for the property. Please see Exhibit 11. Noise Abatement and Control Noise Control Act of 1972, as amended by the Quiet Communities Act of 1978; 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart B Yes No The properties immediately surrounding the Site are developed. No significant noise disturbance is anticipated from nearby roadways or from Hilo International Airport. Construction activities at the Site may increase noise levels, however limiting these activities to daylight hours will help to minimize noise impacts during construction. HDOH Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 46, “Community Noise Control” regulations will be complied with for the duration of the project. If noise levels exceed allowable levels, as stated in Chapter 46 rules, a noise permit will be obtained. Once the project is completed, no significant increases in noise are anticipated. While overall noise levels would increase due to a rise in area population, increases would only be observed as modest increases in vehicular traffic, mechanical noise (i.e, air conditioning) and voice load. No industrial processes or activities that would contribute to a significant adverse impact to the noise environment are anticipated. Please see Exhibit 12. X X X https://maps.bts.dot.gov/arcgis/apps/webappviewer/index.ht ml?id=a303ff5924c9474790464ccOe9d5c9fb Sole Source Aquifers Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, particularly section 1424€; 40 CFR Part 149 Yes No The Site is not located on a sole source aquifer. The County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply provides public water service for Hilo. Water supply is from the Hilo aquifer system, which has a sustainable yield of 347 million gallons per day (MGD). The potable water calculations are being determined at this time with the finalization of fixture types/counts through the building design process. Potable water estimates based on the unit count and unit type were used by Imata and Associates Inc. They provided an estimate of 29,890 gallons per day (gpd) drinking water demand for the proposed project. There are no existing water services to the Site. An existing water commitment for a proposed development on the Site expired in June of 2016. Water is available from an 8-inch waterline within Kapiolani Street fronting parcel 080. The Hawaii County Department of Water Supply can issue a water commitment if their conditions and standards are met and an application is submitted. Please see Exhibit 13. Wetlands Protection Executive Order 11990, particularly sections 2 and 5 Yes No The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory, Wetlands Mapper (USFWS, 2018) did not identify any wetlands in the project area. Riverine features were mapped to the northwest and east of the Site. Please see Exhibit 14. ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898 Yes No The Office of the Governor of Hawaii, Hawaii State Legislature, and HHFDC have identified a need for affordable housing in Hawaii. The proposed project involves the new construction for 64 affordably-priced multi-family subdivision housing units. There are no adverse environmental conditions affecting the Site. The development will have a positive effect on the target community, as there is a dire need for affordable housing in the State of Hawaii. Please see Exhibit 16. X X X Environmental Assessment Factors [24 CFR 58.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 & 1508.27] Recorded below is the qualitative and quantitative significance of the effects of the proposal on the character, features and resources of the project area. Each factor has been evaluated and documented, as appropriate and in proportion to its relevance to the proposed action. Verifiable source documentation has been provided and described in support of each determination, as appropriate. Credible, traceable and supportive source documentation for each authority has been provided. Where applicable, the necessary reviews or consultations have been completed and applicable permits of approvals have been obtained or noted. Citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references are clear. Additional documentation is attached, as appropriate. All conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures have been clearly identified. Impact Codes: Use an impact code from the following list to make the determination of impact for each factor. (1) Minor beneficial impact (2) No impact anticipated (3) Minor Adverse Impact – May require mitigation (4) Significant or potentially significant impact requiring avoidance or modification which may require an Environmental Impact Statement Environmental Assessment Factor Impact Code Impact Evaluation LAND DEVELOPMENT Conformance with Plans / Compatible Land Use and Zoning / Scale and Urban Design 1 The Proposed Action would have a significant beneficial impact on land use and zoning. Consistency with its zoning designation would make available additional housing for low income families. Soil Suitability / Slope / Erosion / Drainage / Storm Water Runoff 3 The Proposed Action could have a potential minor adverse impact to soils because of construction activities (i.e., grubbing, grading, excavation and trenching) that disturb the earth and soils. Exposed soils are susceptible to erosion during periods of heavy rain or wind. Short-term adverse impacts would be minimalized to less than significant or avoided by implementing temporary erosion control measures during construction activities. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for construction Storm Water Activities will be obtained from the HDOH. During site preparation, storm https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice https://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/environmental- justice-and-national-environmental- policy-act runoff from the community site will be controlled in compliance with the Count’s “Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Standards.” Typical mitigation measures include appropriately stockpiling materials on-site to prevent runoff and building over or establishing landscaping as early as possible on disturbed soils to minimize length of exposure. Geotechnical studies were performed on site and it was determined that surface water runoff can be sufficiently collected and drained through onsite retention pits or basins. Hazards and Nuisances including Site Safety and Noise 3 Construction activities at the Site will increase noise levels during the project. Limiting those activities that may increase noise levels to daylight hours will help to minimize noise impacts during construction. HDOH Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 46, “Community Noise Control” regulations will be complied with for the duration of the project. If noise levels exceed allowable levels, stated in Chapter 46 rules, a noise permit will be obtained. Once the project is completed, no significant increases in noise are anticipated. While overall noise levels would increase due to a rise in area population, increases would only be observed as modest increases in vehicular traffic, mechanical noise (i.e. air conditioning) and voice load. No industrial processes or activities that would contribute to a significant adverse impact to the noise environment are planned under the Proposed Action. Energy Consumption 2 The Proposed Action would not require substantial energy consumption. The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani will involve the short- term commitment of fuel for equipment, vehicles, and machinery during construction activities. However, this use is not anticipated to result in a substantial consumption of energy resources. In the long-term, the community will create an additional demand for electricity. However, this demand is not deemed substantial or excessive within the context of the region’s overall energy consumption. The change in population and demand for energy would be readily met by existing infrastructure. SOCIOECONOMIC Employment and Income Patterns 1 No adverse impacts to the economy near the Site are anticipated as a result under the proposed project. The proposed renovations will result in short-term economic benefit for the construction industry. Over the long term, residents of the subdivision will contribute to the economy through the payment of sales and property taxes, as well as the consumption of goods and services from local businesses. Demographic Character Changes, Displacement 1 Construction of housing for low income households is expected to have a significant beneficial impact on the social and community identity of the area. The proposed project will add residential units to the district and assist families who would otherwise have few, if any options, for affordable housing in the area. COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Education and Cultural Facilities 2 The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani is located within the Hawaii School District, Hilo complex. Hilo Union, Hilo Intermediate, and Hilo High School are the schools within the Hilo complex that would service the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani community. The proposed project is not located within any of the School Impact Districts where fees are collected, though the Department of Education is reassessing whether collection of fees will be implemented in the future. Commercial Facilities 2 The Proposed Action is expected to have no impact to commercial facilities. No commercial facilities are needed for the project and there are no commercial facilities near the project area. Health Care and Social Services 2 The Proposed Action is expected to have no adverse impact on health care on the island. Hilo Medical Center is located less than 1.5 miles away. Straub Medical Center, Hilo Clinic is a little over a half mile away. Ululani Medical Center is less than 0.25 miles away. Kaiser Permanente Hilo Clinic is located approximately 2.6 miles from the project site. Kaiser Permanente provides general medical, behavioral, and optical health services. Solid Waste Disposal / Recycling 3 Construction activities at the Site will increase solid waste and construction wastes. Waste generated by site preparation will primarily consist of vegetation, rocks, and debris from clearing, grubbing, and grading. Very little demolition material is expected, as the site is essentially vacant. These wastes will be minimized by proper planning of building materials and recycling efforts. A solid waste management plan will be coordinated with the County’s Solid Waste Division for the disposal of onsite and construction-related waste material. Once the project is completed, solid waste generation will be increased over the current conditions. This increase in waste generation would not contribute to a significant adverse impact under the proposed project. Residential wastes are disposed of at West Hawaii Sanitary Landfill South Hilo Sanitary landfill, operated by waste management, located near Waikoloa to the west of the Site in Hilo. The nearest transfer station is Hilo Transfer Station. Waste Water / Sanitary Sewers 2 There are existing sewer lines along Kukuau Street and Kapiolani Street, with an existing sewer main on Kukuau Street. These sewer lines and sewer main are maintained by the County of Hawaii Wastewater Division. The waste water calculations are being determined at this time with the finalization of fixture types/counts through the building design process. Waste water estimates based on the unit count and unit type were used by Imata & Associates, Inc. Water Supply 2 The Proposed Action is expected to have no adverse impact on the public facilities on the island. Water will continue to be provided to the existing recreational and public facilities and their operations will continue as they exist today. The potable water calculations are being determined at this time with the finalization of fixture types/counts through the building design process. Potable water estimates based on the unit count and unit type were used by Imata & Associates. Public Safety – Police, Fire and Emergency Medical 2 The Proposed Action is expected to have no adverse impact on public safety on the island. Medical facilities, police and fire protection services are nearby. The Hawaii County Department has 20 stations throughout the island of Hawaii. There is one station in Hilo, “Station 1”, which is located at 466 Kinoole Street, less than a mile away from the Site. The next nearest station is “Station 2”, located at 95 Keaa Street, which is approximately 2.3 miles from the Site. The Hawaii Police Department is headquartered in Hilo, located at 349 Kapiolani Street, directly across the street from the Site. Kaiser Permanente Hilo Clinic is located approximately 2.6 miles from the project site. Kaiser Permanente provides general medical, behavioral, and optical health services. Parks, Open Space, and Recreation 2 The Proposed Action is expected to have no adverse impact on the recreational facilities on the island. The Department of Parks and Recreation operates and maintains over a dozen parks, including numerous beach parks as well as community recreational facilities and the Hilo Municipal Golf Course. There are numerous privately-owned golf courses open to the public within the Hilo and east Hawaii area. The development plans on having an outside playground with open space and areas together, such as picnic tables. This is in addition to the community center. Transportation and Accessibility 3 No significant adverse impacts are anticipated under the Proposed Action. Traffic in the area was evaluated for the intersections surrounding the project site. Traffic was evaluated on the following intersections: Kukuau Street/ Kupukupu Street (unsignalized); Kapiolani Street/ Kukuau Street (unsignalized); Kapiolani Street/ Hualalai Street (unsignalized). Traffic conditions were assessed during the peak AM and PM hours. (See Exhibit 17). Traffic at these areas operated at a LOS of C or better. Projected traffic in the year 2021 showed slightly worsening of traffic conditions operating at a LOS of D or better. During construction activities, access and traffic are anticipated to increase compared to normal Site operations. If access and traffic are impacted because of renovation activities, minimizing impact on traffic and access to less than significant levels can be accomplished by the following: 1)Mobilizing and de-mobilizing construction vehicles and equipment during non-peak traffic hours 2)Use of temporary traffic control devices, such as signage, barricades, and cones, in accordance with City and County traffic standards; and 3)If necessary, utilize off-duty police to manage traffic. NATURAL FEATURES Unique Natural Features, Water Resources 3 No significant adverse impacts are anticipated to groundwater resources assuming implementation of the Proposed Action. Hazardous substances that could adversely affect groundwater are not likely to be introduced or released into the soil given the proposed use of the Site as housing. Water system improvements will be designed and constructed in accordance with the County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply standards and requirements. Fire hydrants will be installed with a maximum spacing of 250 feet. Vegetation, Wildlife 2 No adverse impacts to flora/fauna are anticipated due to the proposed project. No threatened or endangered species, or candidates for listing as endangered or threatened species of concern, are known to exist in the project area. Other Factors 2 No adverse impacts to natural hazard vulnerability would result from the proposed project. The project area lies approximately 95 feet above mean sea level and is classified within Flood Zone X, where the risk of flooding would be minimal. Additional Studies Performed: 2006 – Archaeological Inventory Survey October 2018 – Biological Survey June 2019 – Traffic Impact Analysis Report August 2019 – Archaeological Assessment September 2020 – Archeological Field Survey Field Inspection (Date and completed by): February 10, 2019 by Max Ulloa of Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]: Various Federal, State, and County agencies were consulted during the preparation of the draft environmental assessment. County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development – 2018 The project was presented to representatives of the County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community, including Housing Administrator Mr. Neil Gyotoku. List of Permits Obtained: The following approvals may be required for the implementation of the project. All approvals will be obtained in accordance with approving agency guidelines. 6.2.1 State of Hawaii (a) Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS), environmental review (b) Department of Health • Chapter 46, Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) – noise permit, as required • Chapter 11-55, HAR – National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit for construction stormwater discharges (c) Chapter 6E, HRS, State Historic Preservation Division, as required 6.2.2 County of Hawaii (a) Conditional Use Permit, as required (b) Building Permits for infrastructure improvements (c) Grading Permits for earthwork activities associated with infrastructure improvements Public Outreach [24 CFR 50.23 & 58.43]: Pre- Consultation Letters – July 17, 2019 A Pre-Consultation letter was sent informing various federal, state, and county agencies, as well as representatives for the project area. The letter provided a background of the project and requested any comments for consideration in preparing the draft EA. Cumulative Impact Analysis [24 CFR 58.32] Cumulative effects are not anticipated as a result of implementing the proposed project. The proposed project represents a logical use of lands entitled for residential uses, within the urban area of Hilo. While further development in Hilo is probable, the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani development is an in-fill of the recognized residential growth boundaries of the region and has been seen as such by the Hilo Community Plan. Secondary impacts are those that have the potential to occur later in time or farther in distance, but which are reasonably foreseeable. They can be viewed as actions of others that are taken because of the presence of the project. Secondary impacts from highway projects, for example, can occur because they can induce development by removing transportation impediments to growth. There are no substantial, adverse, secondary impacts associated with the proposed project. The build-out of 64 affordable units will create minimal impacts upon area infrastructure, as discussed above, and will not generate a need to expand public infrastructure. Alternatives [24 CFR 58.40€; 40 CFR 1508.9] The Proposed Action is the construction of a 64-unit multi-family subdivision. This development would provide affordable housing to low income households. If approved, the subject parcel would require grading and construction permits for implementation. No Action Alternative [24 CFR 58.40€]: Under the No alternative, the property, which is zoned for residential uses, would continue to remain vacant. Additionally, 64 affordable residential units targeted at low income families would not become available. Given the recognized need for affordable-priced housing as well as the land owner’s desire to see some use made of the land, this No Action Alternative is not preferred. Summary of Findings and Conclusions: The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani development will not result in an irrevocable commitment to loss or destruction of any natural or cultural resources. There are no archaeological sites to be preserved, no evidence of past or present use for Hawaiian cultural practices, resources, or beliefs, and no known rare, endangered or threatened species of flora, fauna or avifauna or critical habitat for any such species located within the property. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani will not curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment. This community is intended to provide affordable housing in the Hilo region. Use of the land for housing is appropriate in the context of the Hilo Community Plan and the current need for affordable housing inventory. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani is in accord with the State’s policies and goals, as set forth in HRS Chapter 344-3 (listed below). The subdivision will not waste or misuse natural resources. The proposed project is suitable for the area proposed and will improve social and economic welfare by providing affordable housing inventory. The State’s Environmental Policy is set forth in Chapter 344-3, HRS. (1) Conserve the natural resources, so that land, water, mineral, visual, air and other natural resources are protected by controlling pollution, by pre-serving or augmenting natural resources, and by safeguarding the State’s unique natural environmental characteristics in a manner which will foster and promote the general welfare, create and maintain conditions under which humanity and nature can exist in productive harmony, and fulfill the social economic, and other requirements of the people of Hawaii. (2) Enhance the quality of life by: a. Setting population limits so that the interaction between the natural and artificial environments and the population is mutually beneficial; b. Creating opportunities for the residents of Hawaii to improve their quality of life through diverse economic activities which are stable and in balance with the physical and social environments; c. Establish communities which provide a sense of identity, wise use of land, efficient transportation, and aesthetic and social satisfaction in harmony with the natural environment which is uniquely Hawaiian; and d. Establishing a commitment on the part of each person to protect and enhance Hawaii’s environment and reduce the drain on nonrenewable resources. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani is expected to have a direct beneficial effect on the local economy. The addition of affordable housing units addresses the need for homes in the region. The project is not expected to impact cultural resources as no cultural resources have been identified on the property; there is no evidence of past or present use for Hawaiian cultural practices, resources, or beliefs. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani is not expected to substantially affect public health. Environmental impacts from the community, such as noise and air pollution, will be minimal. A clean source of water will be provided. Wastewater will be properly handled. Additional drainage will be retained onsite. Solid waste will be disposed of properly. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani does involve substantial secondary impacts. Residents are not expected to adversely impact public services such as police, fire, and emergency medical operations, nor are they anticipated to have an adverse effect upon educational and recreational facilities. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani does not involve a substantial degradation of environmental quality. During the construction phase, there will be short-term air quality and noise impacts. In the long-term, effects upon air quality and ambient noise levels will be minimal. Other impacts, such as site grading, increased runoff, and use of resources, are not expected to be significant and can be mitigated with proper management techniques. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani does not involve a commitment to larger action as it is an “infill” project. As represented by the RM 1.5 multi-family dwelling units designation, residential uses on the site represent the carefully thought out development in Hilo. While the project may add new residents to the area, impacts from these new residents are not expected to be significant, and can be accommodated without substantially increasing public infrastructure or services. No endangered or threatened species or critical habitats are known to exist in the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project area. Best Management Practices will be implemented to prevent secondary impacts to the coastal habitat, which may contain rare, threatened, or endangered species. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani will meet all required State and County air, water, and ambient noise quality standards prior to and during construction. No significant long-term impacts are anticipated. Construction activities will result in short-term air quality and noise impacts. Dust control measures, such as regular watering and sprinkling, will be implemented to minimize wind-blown emissions. Noise impacts will occur primarily from construction-related activities. It is anticipated that construction will be limited to daylight working hours. Water quality is not expected to be affected. In the long term, the community is not anticipated to have significant impacts on air, water quality, or ambient noise levels. Kaiaulu O Kapiolani is not located within, and will not affect, environmentally sensitive areas. The site is not subject to flooding or tsunami inundation. There are no geologically hazardous lands, estuaries, or coastal waters within or adjacent to the site. Hilo does afford beautiful views, however the subject property is not specifically identified in any county or State plans or studies as containing scenic vistas or view planes. The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani site is not identified as a scenic vista or view plane nor will it affect identified scenic vistas or view planes. The community will not affect scenic corridors and coastal scenic and open space resources. No substantial increase in energy consumption is expected as a result of the proposed action. The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani will involve the short-term commitment of fuel for equipment, vehicles, and machinery during construction activities. However, this use is not anticipated to result in a substantial consumption of energy resources. In the long-term, the community will create an additional demand for electricity. However, this demand is not deemed substantial or excessive within the context of the region’s overall energy consumption. Based on the foregoing findings, it is anticipated that the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani will not result in any significant impacts. Mitigation Measures and Conditions [40 CFR 1505.2(c)] Summarized below are all the mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non-compliance or non- conformance with the above-listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan. Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure HAR, Chapter 11-46, Community Noise Control HAR Chapter 11-60.1, Air Pollution Control, Section 11-60.1-33, Fugitive Dust; County’s “Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Standards.” Grading activities will be limited to normal daylight hours in order to limit noise impact and adhere to the Department of Health’s noise regulations for construction equipment. All construction activities will comply with all applicable Federal, State, and County regulations and rules for erosion control. Before issuance of grading permit by the County of Hawaii, the final erosion control plan and best management practices required for the NPDES permit will be completed. Typical mitigation measures taken to control erosion during the site development period include: minimizing the time of construction; retaining existing ground cover as long as possible; constructing drainage control features early; using temporary sprinklers in non-active construction areas when ground cover is removed; appropriately stockpiling materials on-site to prevent runoff; watering graded areas as needed, using temporary berms and cut-ff ditches where needed, installing silt screens where appropriate, covering open-bodied trucks. In 2007, the Hawaii Legislature enacted Act 245 as Section 302A, HRS, “School Impact Fees”. Based upon this legislation, the Department of Education will be enacting impact fees for residential developments that occur within identified school impact districts. Should the area be so designated prior to final subdivision approval, the applicant will coordinate with the DOE to determine the appropriate measures to be taken as required by the Section 302A-1603(b), HRS. Drainage An onsite drainage system will be constructed to accommodate runoff generated by a 50-year storm for one (1) hour for a fully developed site. The proposed system will include curb-inlet catch basins, drain manholes, drain lines and perforated drain lines. The system will be constructed in accordance with the County rules for the design of storm drainage facilities and to ensure that there are no adverse impacts to adjacent and downtown stream properties. Please see Exhibit 5 for drainage studies. Department of Water Supply Based upon coordination with the County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply, water for the subdivision will be provided from their water system. The water system improvements will be designed and constructed in accordance with County standards and requirements. Best management practices designed to minimize infiltration and runoff from daily operations will be implemented. Determination: Finding of No Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.27] The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. Finding of Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(2); 40 CFR 1508.27] The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Preparer Signature: _________________________________________Date:________ Name/Title/Organization: _______________________________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: Certifying Officer Signature: ___________________________________Date:________ Name/Title: ______________________________________________________________ This original, signed document and related supporting material must be retained on file by the Responsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part 58.38) and in accordance with recordkeeping requirements for the HUD program(s). 8//11/2022 Rachel Okoji / President / Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Compliance with Part 50 and 58 of HTF Environmental Provisions 24 CFR 93.301(F)(1) Environmental Provisions and Resource Yes/ No Environmental Review Record Historic Preservation National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, particularly sections 106 and 110; 36 CFR Part 800. YES Two surveys were conducted of the project parcels. Nelson, Clark, and Rechtman conducted an AIS of parcels 048 and 053 in 2006 and in 2019. An AIS of parcel 080 was conducted by Glen and Suzan Escott in 2019. No evidence of prehistoric or historic sites or features was observed during the field surveys. No areas of cultural significance were identified during consultation with locals or during the literature review. SHPD concurred with the “no historic properties affected” determination. An Archaelogical Field Inspection was conducted in September 2020 by ASM Affiliates. A 100% surface inspection was performed of the entire parcel. No lava blisters or historic properties were observed. ASM recommended a “no historic properties affected” determination for the property. http://www.nps.gov.nr/research/ Please see Exhibit 11. Farmlands Farmland Protection Policy Act of 1981, particularly sections 1504(b) and 1541; 7 CFR Part 658 YES The County of Hawaii, Planning Division, indicates the Site Land Use Ordinance Zoning Designation is Multi-Family Dwelling Units (RM 1.5). The Site is not located in a Special District or Special Management Area. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service Classifies the soil within the 100% Keaukaha-Urban land complex. It is classified as Hydrologic Soil Group D with a typical profile consisting of highly decomposed plant material from 0 to 4 inches below ground surface (bgs), and lithic bedrock from 4 to 14 inches bgs. The soils have high runoff class, which indicates they are well drained. The depth of groundwater is more than 80 inches (USDA, 2019). http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoil Survey.aspx Please see Exhibit 9. Environmental Provision and Resource Yes/ No Environmental Review Record Airport Zones 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D https://www.epa.gov/nepa/nepassi st YES A site visit confirmed the Project Area is not within 2,500 feed from the end of a runway at a civil airport or 15,000 feet from the end of a runway at a military airfield. Site visit was conducted by Max Ulloa of Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC on February 10, 2019. Due to the proximity of the Hilo Airport, PV cells will not be able to be utilized at the proposed project http://aviation.hawaii.gov/airfields- airports/hawaii/ Please see Exhibit 1. Floodplains Executive Order 11988, particularly section 2(a); 24 CFR Part 55 YES According to FEMA FIRM Map No. 1551660736F, it was determined that the Site lies beyond the 500-year flood plain (within Flood Zone X). http://msc.fema.gov/portal Please see Exhibit 10. Wetlands Executive Order 11990, particularly sections 2 and 5 YES The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory, Wetlands Mapper (USFWS, 2018) did not identify any wetlands in the project area. Riverine features were mapped to the northwest and east of the Site. Please see Exhibit 14. Contamination 24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2) YES According to a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) dated February 2019, and a subsequent reconnaissance visit on February 10, 2019, the subject Site was not listed on any of the databases searched by Environmental Data Resources (EDR), which provides a review of federal, state, and local lists and available files of reported hazardous waste sites and hazardous substance/petroleum product sources and Environmental Provisions and Resource Yes/ No Environmental Review Record releases. The ESA did not identify any American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) defined Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) for the subject Site. ASTM proximity search guidelines were used to evaluate properties near the Site. There are no underground storage tanks (USTs) located on the Site, or on properties adjacent to the Site. No leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites were located directly adjacent to the Site. A search of the HDOH UST Branch database records (dated 08/31/2018) resulted in eleven (11) sites having reported a UST release within a ½-mile radius of the Site. According to the HDOH LUST database, of the 11 LUST sites, nine (9) sites are recorded as Site Cleanup Completed and were issued a No Further Action (NFA). The LUST sites do not pose an environmental threat to the subject Site. Please see Exhibit 6. Noise Noise Control Act of 1972, as amended by the Quiet Communities Act of 1978; 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart B YES The properties immediately surrounding the Site are developed. No significant noise disturbance is anticipated from nearby roadways or from Hilo International Airport. Construction activities at the Site may increase noise levels, however limiting these activities to daylight hours will help to minimize noise impacts during construction. HDOH Administrative Rules, Title 11, Chapter 46, “Community Noise Control” regulations will be complied with for the duration of the project. If noise levels exceed allowable levels, as stated in Chapter 46 rules, a noise permit will be obtained. Once the project is completed, no significant increases in noise are anticipated. While overall noise levels would increase due to a rise in area population, increases would only be observed as modest increases in vehicular traffic, mechanical noise (i.e, air conditioning) and voice load. No industrial processes or activities that would contribute to a significant adverse impact to the noise environment are anticipated. Environmental Provisions and Resource Yes/ No Environmental Review Record https://maps.bts.dot.gov/arcgis/apps/webappviewe r/index.html?id=a303ff5924c9474790464ccOe9d 5c9fb Please see Exhibit 12. Safe Drinking Water Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, particularly section 1424€; 40 CFR Part 149 There are no existing water services to the Site. An existing water commitment for a proposed development on the Site expired in June of 2016. Water is available from an 8-inch waterline within Kapiolani Street fronting parcel 080. The Hawaii County Department of Water Supply can issue a water commitment if their conditions and standards are met and an application is submitted. The pipes that will need to be installed to provide water to the Site will use only lead-free pipes, solder, and flux. Please see Exhibit 13. If any of the answers to the worksheet above are “No” the project cannot be funded through the Housing Trust Fund. However, it is possible that the project can be funded using other HUD funds.1 1 93.301 (f)(3) Acquisition projects environmental requirements. (i)(A) Existing housing that is acquired with HTF funds and has been newly constructed or rehabilitated less than 12 months before the commitment of HTF funds must meet the property standards at paragraph (f)(1) of this section. (B) All other existing housing that is acquired with HTF assistance must meet the property standards requirements of paragraph (f)(2) of this section. (ii) If under paragraph (f)(3)(i)(A) of paragraph (B) of this section, HTF funds cannot be used to acquire the property. (4) Manufactured housing environmental requirements. Manufactured housing is subject to the environmental standards in paragraph (f)(1) of this section for new construction or paragraph (f)(2) of this section for rehabilitation, as applicable. If an existing property does not meet these standards, HTF funds cannot be used to acquire the property unless it is rehabilitated to meet the standards in paragraph (f)(2), as applicable, with the exception of noise standards in paragraph (f)(2)(x). EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Airport Hazards Exhibit 2: Coastal Barrier Resources Exhibit 3: Flood Insurance Exhibit 4: Clean Air Exhibit 5: Coastal Zone Management Exhibit 6: Contamination and Toxic Substances Exhibit 7: Endangered Species Exhibit 8: Explosive and Flammable Hazards Exhibit 9: Farmlands Protection Exhibit 10: Floodplain Management Exhibit 11: Historic Preservation Exhibit 12: Noise Abatement and Control Exhibit 13: Sole Source Aquifers/Safe Drinking Water Exhibit 14: Wetlands Protection Exhibit 15: Environmental Justice Exhibit 16: Consultation Letters Exhibit 17: Traffic Impact Analysis Exhibit 1: Airport Hazards PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Airport Zones Accident Potential Zone Exhibit 2: Coastal Barrier Resources PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Coastal Barrier Resources Kaiulu O Kapiolani U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Coastal Barrier Resources Act Program, Esri, HERE, Garmin, (c)OpenStreetMap contributorsEsri,HERE,Garmin,(c)OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS user communitySource:Esri,DigitalGlobe,GeoEye,EarthstarGeographics,CNES/AirbusDS,USDA, USGS, CBRS Buffer Zone CBRS Units Otherwise Protected Area System Unit August 8, 2019 0 1 20.5 mi 0 2 41 km 1:83,199 This page was produced by the CBRS Mapper This map is for general reference only. The Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS) boundaries depicted on this map are representations ofthecontrollingCBRSboundaries,which areshownon the official maps,accessible athttps://www.fws.gov/cbra/maps/index.html.AllCBRSrelateddatashouldbeusedinaccordancewiththelayermetadatafoundontheCBRSMapperwebsite. The CBRS Buffer Zone represents the area immediately adjacent to the CBRS boundary where users are advised to contact the Service for anofficialdetermination(http://www.fws.gov/cbra/Determinations.html)as to whether the propertyor projectsite islocated "in"or"out"of theCBRS. CBRS Units normally extend seaward out to the 20- or 30-foot bathymetric contour (depending on the location of the unit). The true seawardextentoftheunitsisnotshownintheCBRSmapper. Exhibit 3: Flood Insurance PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: NOAA Tsunami Zone Evacuation Map PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed April, 2019. National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet Ü155°5'31.01"W 19°43'5.78"N 155°4'53.55"W 19°42'31.91"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone X Future Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood Hazard Zone XArea with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes.Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile BaselineHydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 8/8/2019 at 6:10:37 PM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes. Legend OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERALSTRUCTURES OTHERFEATURES MAP PANELS 8 1:6,000 B 20.2 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. Exhibit 4: Clean Air Act 2015 Annual Summary of Hawaii Air Quality Data Air Pollutant Average Time Annual Mean Standards Hawaii State Standard Federal Primary Standard Federal Secondary Standard Carbon Monoxide 1-hr 0.7 / 0.7 ppm 9 ppm 35 ppm --- 8-hr 0.7 / 0.7 ppm 4.4 ppm 9 ppm --- Ozone 24-hr 0.024 / 0.028 ppm 0.08 ppm 0.07 ppm 0.07 ppm PM10 24-hr 15.8 / 21.1 µg/m3 150 µg/m3 150 µg/m3 --- Annual 15.8 / 21.1 µg/m3 50 µg/m3 --- --- PM2.5 24-hour 4.7 µg/m3 --- 35 µg/m3 35 µg/m3 Annual 4.7 µg/m3 --- 12 µg/m3 15 µg/m 3 Nitrogen Dioxide 1-hour 0.022 ppm* --- 0.100 ppm --- Annual 0.004 / 0.004 ppm 0.04 ppm 0.053 ppm 0.053 ppm Sulfur Dioxide 1-hour 0.001 / 0.026 ppm --- 0.075 ppm --- 3-hour 0.001 / 0.026 ppm 0.5 ppm --- 0.5 ppm 24-hour 0.001 / 0.026 ppm 0.14 ppm --- --- Annual 0.001 / 0.026 ppm 0.03 ppm --- --- Lead Rolling 3 month 0.001 µg/m3 1.5 µg/m3 0.15 µg/m3 0.15 µg/m3 Hydrogen sulfide 1-hour 0.001 ppm (Puna) 0.025 ppm --- --- Note: All measurements were taken at the Kapolei Monitoring Station, except for PM2.5 which his reported from the Kihei Monitoring Station. Secondary values are the greatest value of all measurements taken in the State regardless of location. µg/m3 = micrograms per cubic meter/ *98th % value. State of Hawaii Annual Summary 2015 Air Quality Data Virginia Pressler, M.D.David Y. Ige Director of Health Governor of Hawaii State of Hawaii Department of Health December 2016 Kilauea Lighthouse in Kilauea, Kauai i 2015 Hawaii Air Quality Data Contents LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................ii LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................iii ERRATA Sheets for 2014 Data.......................................................................................iv Section 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 Section 2 DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................. 3 Section 3 SITE LOCATIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS...................................................................... 7 Section 4 2015 AIR QUALITY DATA ............................................................................................ 17 Section 5 2015 PM2.5 SPECIATION DATA.....................................................................................33 Section 6 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY TRENDS ............................................................................... 36 ii List of Tables Table Title Page 2-1 State of Hawaii and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards ................................ 6 3-1 State of Hawaii Ambient Air Monitoring Network................................................ 15 3-2 Sampling Equipment at Each Monitoring Station................................................ 16 4-1 2015 Summary of the 24-Hour PM10 Averages.................................................. 18 4-2 Attainment Determination of the 24-Hour PM10 NAAQS..................................... 18 4-3 2015 Summary of the 24-Hour PM2.5 Averages: SLAMS Stations..................... 19 4-4 Attainment Determination of the 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: SLAMS Stations....... 19 4-5 Attainment Determination of the Annual PM2.5 NAAQS: SLAMS Stations......... 19 4-6 2015 Summary of the 24-Hour PM2.5 Averages: SPM Stations......................... 20 4-7 2015 Summary of the 8-Hour O3 Averages........................................................ 20 4-8 Attainment Determination of the 8-Hour O3 NAAQS........................................... 21 4-9 2015 Summary of the 1-Hour and Annual NO2 Averages................................... 21 4-10 Attainment Determination of the 1-Hour NO2 NAAQS: SLAMS Stations …...…. 21 4-11 2015 Summary of the 1-Hour SO2 Averages NAAQS ........................................ 22 4-12 Attainment Determination of the 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS: SLAMS Stations …...…. 23 4-13 2015 Summary of the 3-Hour SO2 Averages...................................................... 24 4-14 2015 Summary of the 24-Hour and Annual SO2 Averages................................. 25 4-15 2015 Summary of the 1-Hour CO Averages....................................................... 26 4-16 2015 Summary of the 8-Hour CO Averages....................................................... 26 4-17 2015 Summary of the 1-Hour H2S Averages (State Standard)........................... 26 4-18 2015 Summary of the Rolling 3-Month Lead Averages ...................................... 27 4-19 2015 Monthly Maximum of 24-Hour PM10 Values (µg/m 3) .................................. 27 4-20 2015 Monthly Maximum of 24-Hour PM2.5 Values (µg/m 3) ................................. 28 4-21 2015 Monthly Maximum of 1-Hour NO2 Values (ppm)........................................ 29 4-22 2015 Monthly Maximum of 1-Hour CO Values (ppm)......................................... 29 4-23 2015 Monthly Maximum of 8-Hour CO Values (ppm)......................................... 29 4-24 2015 Monthly Maximum of 8-Hour O3 Values (ppm) .......................................... 30 4-25 2015 Monthly Maximum of 1-Hour SO2 Values (ppm)........................................ 30 4-26 2015 Monthly Maximum of 3-Hour SO2 Values (ppm)........................................ 31 4-27 2015 Monthly Maximum of 24-Hour SO2 Values (ppm)...................................... 32 4-28 2015 Monthly Maximum of 1-Hour H2S Values (ppm)........................................ 32 4-29 2015 Monthly Maximum of Rolling 3-Month Lead Values (µg/m 3)...................... 32 5-1 Annual Summary of PM2.5 Speciation Data........................................................ 34 5-2 Speciation Collection and Analysis Methods...................................................... 35 iii List of Figures Figure Title Page 3-1 Island of Oahu Air Monitoring Stations ................................................................. 7 3-2 Island of Maui Air Monitoring Stations .................................................................. 9 3-3 Island of Hawaii Air Monitoring Stations ............................................................. 11 3-4 Island of Kauai Air Monitoring Station................................................................. 14 6-1 PM10 Annual Average: 2011-2015..................................................................... 37 6-2 PM10 Maximum 24-Hour Average: 2011-2015................................................... 37 6-3 PM2.5 Annual Average: 2011-2015 .................................................................... 38 6-4 PM2.5 98th Percentile 24-Hour Average: 2011-2015........................................... 38 6-5 SO2 Annual Average: 2011-2015 ...................................................................... 39 6-6 SO2 Maximum 24-Hour Average: 2011-2015.................................................... 39 6-7 NO2 Annual Average: 2011-2015 ...................................................................... 40 6-8 NO2 Maximum 1-Hour Average: 2011-2015...................................................... 40 6-9 O3 Fourth Highest Daily Maximum 8-Hour Average: 2011-2015....................... 41 6-10 CO Maximum 1-Hour Average: 2011-2015 ....................................................... 41 6-11 CO Maximum 8-Hour Average: 2011-2015 ....................................................... 42 ERRATA Sheet for 2014 Air Data Book The corrections are highlighted in yellow Table 4-6.2014 Summary of the 24-Hour PM2.5 Averages: SPM Stations Maximum Annual Mean No. of 24-hour Averages Greater than 35 µg/m 3 1st High 98 th%All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery HAWAII Hilo 19.7 15.5 4.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 330 90.4 Kona 27.0 17.6 10.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 335 91.8 Mt. View 20.6 14.4 3.4 1 000000000000 365 278 76.2 Ocean View 35.2 21.7 11.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 315 86.3 Pahala 23.7 14.8 5.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 335 91.8 Waikoloa 42.4 38.8 9.4 0 0 2-- --- --- - 90 2 84 93.3 KAUAI Niumalu 14.5 10.4 4.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 326 89.3 MAUI Paia 49.7 12.6 5.3 3 000000001000 365 299 81.9 The special purpose stations on Hawaii island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of PM2.5 from volcanic emissions. The special purpose station on Kauai was established to monitor emissions from cruise ships. The special purpose station on Maui was established to monitor emissions from cane burning. 1,3 Does not meet summary criteria, <75% data recovery in one or more quarters 2Station shut down 3/31/2014, incomplete yeariv ERRATA Sheet for 2014 Air Data Book The corrections are highlighted in pink Table 4-20.2014 Monthly Maximum of 24-Hour PM2.5 Values (µg/m 3) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The federal 24-hr PM2.5 standard is 35 µg/m 3 Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec SLAMS Stations Honolulu 12 11 6 12 12 6 6 9 8 9 810 Kapolei 1 10 9 11 14 9 7 6 8 - - - 7 Pearl City 16 13 8 12 12 6 5 7 5 7 6 11 Sand Island 12 11 13 10 11 6 5 7 5 9 8 14 Kihei 8109 11 11 9 6 6 3 8 614 SPM Stations Niumalu (cruise ships) 7891511 9 7510101112 Hilo (volcano) 20 12 15 8 7676571617 Kona (volcano) 18 18 27 16 14 16 16 16 16 15 16 21 Mt. View (volcano) 21 11 17 10 76456121110 Ocean View (volcano) 16 18 35 18 18 17 16 15 18 22 24 23 Pahala (volcano) 24 11 20 13 11 8 8 8 8 51419 Waikoloa 2 (volcano)15 20 42 3 --------- Paia (cane burning) 13 24 11 12 12 7 5 12 50 4 71311 1 Kapolei station no values from September to November, incomplete year 2 Waikoloa station shut down 3/31/14 3 Value due to high winds/dust 4 Value due to brush firev ERRATA Sheet for 2014 Air Data Book The corrections are highlighted in yellow Table 5-1 Continued Parameter 1st High(µg/m3)2nd High(µg/m3)Annual Mean(µg/m3)No. ofSamples PercentRecovery IONS Ammonium Ion 1.25 0.82 0.096 97 80 Potassium Ion 0.51 0.06 0.021 97 80 Sodium Ion 1.17 0.94 0.367 97 80 Total Nitrate 0.97 0.45 0.187 97 80 Sulfate 6.57 4.47 0.959 97 80 vi ERRATA Sheet for 2014 Air Data Book The graph below shows the correction for Hilo Figure 6-5. SO2 Annual Average: 2010-2014 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014ppm Honolulu Kapolei Hilo Kona State and Federal Standardvii 1 Section 1 INTRODUCTION The Department of Health, Clean Air Branch, monitors the ambient air in the State of Hawaii for various gaseous and particulate air pollutants. The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has set national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for six criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, lead, ozone, and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5).Hawaii has also established a state ambient air standard for hydrogen sulfide. The primary purpose of the statewide monitoring network is to measure ambient air concentrations of these pollutants and ensure that these air quality standards are met. The stations are maintained and the data are collected by the Air Surveillance and Analysis Section of the State Laboratories Division. In addition to monitoring the ambient air for criteria pollutants, the State of Hawaii also participates in the NCore multi pollutant monitoring network; the NCore station in Hawaii is located at the Kapolei monitoring station. The NCore network addresses the following objectives: x Timely reporting of data to public by supporting AIRNow, air quality forecasting, and other public reporting mechanisms; x Support for development of emission strategies through air quality model evaluation and other observational methods; x Accountability of emission strategy progress through tracking long-term trends of criteria and non-criteria pollutants and their precursors; x Support for long-term health assessments that contribute to ongoing reviews of the NAAQS; x Compliance through establishing nonattainment/attainment areas through comparison with the NAAQS; x Support to scientific studies ranging across technological, health, and atmospheric process disciplines; x Support to ecosystem assessments recognizing that national air quality networks benefit ecosystem assessments and, in turn, benefit from data specifically designed to address ecosystem analyses; and x PM2.5 speciation monitoring that EPA determined to be essential for establishing a relationship between particle concentrations and adverse health effects and would provide valuable information in characterizing aerosols, determining the effectiveness of control strategies, and understanding the effects of particle pollution on atmospheric and regional haze. Air pollution is caused by many different man-made and natural sources. There are industrial sources of pollution, such as power plants and refineries; mobile sources, such as cars, trucks, and buses; agricultural sources, such as cane burning; and natural sources, such as windblown dust and volcanic activity. In 2015, for the most part, the state maintained 14 air monitoring stations on 4 islands. Most commercial, industrial, 2 and transportation activities and their associated air quality effects occur on Oahu, where 4 of the stations are located. The monitoring stations on Maui are mainly to measure the air quality impacts from agricultural activities. The majority of stations are located on the island of Hawaii to measure air quality impacts from the volcano and geothermal energy production. The monitoring station on Kauai is mainly to measure the air quality impacts from cruise ships. The state’s ambient air monitoring network is reviewed annually and relocations, additions and/or discontinuations can occur in the future as the need arises. This report summarizes the validated air pollutant data collected at the 14 monitoring stations during calendar year 2015. Tabular summaries are provided which compare the measured concentrations of criteria pollutants with federal ambient air quality standards and of hydrogen sulfide with the state standard. The 2015 speciation data is also included in this report. Trend summaries of criteria pollutants parameters are shown graphically. The Department of Health has a web site that displays near real-time air quality data updated throughout the day from the air monitoring stations. The data has not been reviewed for quality assurance and is subject to change but provides the public with viewing access to current air pollutant and meteorological information. To view this data online, go to http://health.hawaii.gov/cab and link to “Hawaii Ambient Air Quality Data.” Additionally, because emissions from the Kilauea volcano are affecting communities on the island of Hawaii on a daily basis, the Department of Health has a website dedicated to displaying short term SO2 data from stations located on the island. It provides near real-time 15-minute SO2 averages and advisory level guidance to help individuals protect themselves against possible health effects. To view this data online, go to www.hiso2index.info To view this entire book as well as books from 2013 and 2014 online, go to: http://health.hawaii.gov/cab and link to “Hawaii Air Quality Data Book.” Questions or comments regarding data in this report and other air quality information should be addressed to: Clean Air Branch Phone: (808)586-4200 Department of Health Fax: (808)586-4359 P.O. Box 3378 Honolulu, Hawaii 96801-3378 The Department of Health provides access to its programs and activities without regard to race, color, national origin (including language), age, sex, religion, or disability. Write our Affirmative Action Officer at P.O. Box 3378, Honolulu, Hawaii 96801-3378, or call (808)586-4616 (voice) within 180 days of a problem. 3 Section 2 DEFINITIONS 98th Percentile Value The PM2.5 24-hour average or the maximum daily 1-hour NO2 average in the year below which 98% of all values fall. 99th Percentile Value The maximum daily 1-hour SO2 value in the year below which 99% of all values fall. Ambient Air The general outdoor atmosphere, external to buildings, to which the general public has access. Ambient Air Quality Standard A limit in the quantity and exposure to pollutants dispersed or suspended in the ambient air. Primary standards are set to protect public health, including sensitive populations such as asthmatics, children, and the elderly. Secondary standards are set to protect public welfare including protection against visibility degradation, and damage to animals, crops, vegetation and buildings. Carbon Monoxide Carbon monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas under atmospheric conditions. It is produced by the incomplete combustion of carbon fuels with the majority of emissions coming from transportation sources. CFR Code of Federal Regulations is the codification of the general and permanent rules published in the Federal Register by the executive departments and agencies of the Federal government. Title 40 is the Protection of the Environment. Collocated This is a procedure required for a certain percentage of PM10 and PM2.5 samplers in the monitoring network. Collocated samplers determine precision or variation in the PM10 or PM2.5 concentration measurements of identical samplers run in the same location under the same sampling conditions. Criteria Pollutants These are the six pollutants for which the EPA has established national air quality standards. The pollutants are ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, lead and particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5). EPA The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency; established to 4 protect human health and the natural environment. Hydrogen Sulfide Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a toxic, colorless gas with a characteristic “rotten egg” odor detectable at very low levels. It occurs naturally during the decomposition of organic matter, near geothermal sources and is also produced during certain industrial processes, including wastewater treatment facilities. Micron One micron is one millionth of a meter or approximately 1/25,000 of an inch. µg/m3 Micrograms per cubic meter. This is the measurement of air quality expressed as mass per unit volume. NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards. These are pollutant standards that the EPA has established to protect public health and welfare. NAAQS have been set for carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, PM10,PM2.5,ozone, sulfur dioxide, and lead. These are commonly referred to as criteria pollutants. NCore A multi-pollutant network that integrates several advanced measurement systems for particles, pollutant gases and meteorology. Most NCore stations have been operating since the formal start of the network on January 1, 2011, including Hawaii’s. Nitrogen Dioxide Nitrogen dioxide (NO2)isabrownish,highlycorrosivegas with a pungent odor. It is formed in the atmosphere from emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx). Sources of nitrogen oxides include electric utilities, industrial boilers, motor vehicle exhaust and combustion of fossil fuels. NO2 is also a component in the atmospheric reaction that produces ground-level ozone. Ozone Ozone (O3) is the main constituent in photochemical air pollution. It is formed in the atmosphere by a chemical reaction of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of sunlight. In the upper atmosphere, O3 shields the earth from harmful ultraviolet radiation; however, at ground level, it can cause harmful effects in humans and plants. Particulate Matter This refers to any solid or liquid matter dispersed in the air. Particulate matter (PM) includes dust, soot, smoke, and 5 liquid droplets from sources such as factories, power plants, motor vehicles, construction, agricultural activities, and fires. PM10 Particulate matter that is 10 microns or less in aerodynamic diameter. These are considered “coarse” particles, generally from sources such as road and windblown dust, and crushing and grinding operations. PM2.5 Particulate matter that is 2.5 microns or less in aerodynamic diameter. Considered “fine” particles, these are generally a result of fuel combustion such as from motor vehicles, utility generation and industrial facilities. Fine particles can also be formed when gases, such as sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide, are chemically transformed into particles. ppm Parts per million is one particle in 1,000,000 other particles. It is approximately one drop in 13 gallons. SLAMS State and Local Air Monitoring Stations. The Clean Air Act requires that every state establish a network of air monitoring stations for criteria pollutants. SPM Special Purpose Monitoring stations. These are stations established to provide data for special studies in support of air program interests and activities. SPM stations supplement the SLAMS network as special circumstances require and adequate resources permit. Sulfur Dioxide Sulfur dioxide (SO2) is a colorless gas that easily combines with water vapor forming sulfuric acid. Emissions of sulfur dioxide are largely from sources that burn fossil fuels such as coal and oil. In Hawaii, another major source of sulfur dioxide emissions is from the eruption of Kilauea Volcano on the Big Island. Vog Vog is a local term used to express volcanic smog. Vog occurs when volcanic gas and particles combine with air and sunlight to produce atmospheric haze. 6 Table 2-1 State and Federal Ambient Air Quality Standards Sources: State standards HAR §11-59; Federal standards 40 CFR Part 50 Air Pollutant Averaging Time Standards Hawaii State Standard Federal Primary Standard a Federal Secondary Standard b Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1-hour 8-hour 9ppm 4.4 ppm 35 ppm 9ppm None Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) 1-hour Annual --- 0.04 ppm 0.100 ppm 0.053 ppm --- 0.053 ppm PM10 24-hour Annual c 150 µg/m 3 50 µg/m 3 150 µg/m 3 --- --- --- PM2.5 24-hour Annual ---35 µg/m 3 12 µg/m 3 35 µg/m 3 15 µg/m 3 Ozone (O3)8-hour 0.08 ppm 0.070 ppm 0.070 ppm Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) 1-hour 3-hour 24-hour Annual --- 0.5 ppm 0.14 ppm 0.03 ppm 0.075 ppm --- --- --- --- 0.5 ppm --- --- Lead (Pb)Rolling 3-month 1.5 µg/m 3d 0.15 µg/m 3 0.15 µg/m 3 Hydrogen Sulfide 1-hour 0.025 ppm None None a Primary Standards set limits to protect public health, including the health of “sensitive” populations such as asthmatics, children and the elderly. b Secondary Standards set limits to protect public welfare, including protection against decreased visibility, damage to animals, crops, vegetation, and buildings. c Due to a lack of evidence linking health problems to long-term exposure to coarse particle pollution, EPA revoked the annual PM10 standard effective December 17, 2006. However, the state still has an annual standard. d The state standard is based on calendar quarter. Compliance with the National Ambient Air Quality Standards CO 1-hour:May not be exceeded more than once per year. CO 8-hour:May not be exceeded more than once per year. NO2 1-hour:The 3-year average of the 98 th percentile daily maximum 1-hour averages must not exceed the standard. NO2 Annual:Average of all 1-hour values in the year may not exceed the level of the standard. PM10 24-hour:Must not be exceeded more than one day per year, after compensating for days when monitoring did not occur (estimated number of exceedances) PM2.5 24-hour:The 3-year average of the 98 th percentile 24-hour concentrations must not exceed the level of the standard. PM2.5 Annual:The 3-year average of 24-hour values must not exceed the level of the standard. Ozone 8-hour:The 3-year average of the fourth highest daily maximum value must not exceed the level of the standard. SO2 1-hour:The 3-year average of the 99 th percentile daily maximum 1-hour averages must not exceed the standard. SO2 3-hour:Not be exceeded more than once per year. SO2 24-hour:Not be exceeded more than once per year. SO2 Annual:Average of all 1-hour values in the year may not exceed the level of the standard. Lead:Average of all 24-hour values in any rolling 3-month period may not exceed the level of the standard. 11 ® 0510 Miles Station Name Location Pollutants Monitored 1Hilo 1099WaianuenueAve.SO2,PM2.5 2MountainView 17-1235VolcanoRd.SO2,PM2.5 3PunaE TMK(3)-1-3-28-37(Leilani)H2S,SO2 4Pahala 96-3150PikakeSt.SO2,PM2.5 5OceanView 92-6091OrchidMaukaCirc.SO2,PM2.5 6 Kona 81-1043 Konawaena School Rd.SO2,PM2.5 Figure 3-3: Island of Hawaii –Air Monitoring Stations 12 Hilo (HL) Location:1099 Waianuenue Ave., Hilo Latitude:19.71756 Longitude:-155.11053 Altitude:136.8 m Parameters:SO2,PM2.5 Established:January 1997 Brief Description: Located near the Hilo Medical Center, this station was established to monitor vog during “Kona” or southerly wind conditions. Kona (KN) Location:81-1043 Konawaena School Rd., Kona Latitude:19.50978 Longitude:-155.91342 Altitude:517.2 m Parameters:SO2,PM2.5 Established:September 2005 Brief Description: Located on the upper campus of Konawaena High School, this station monitors for vog on the west side of the island of Hawaii. Mt. View (MV) Location:17-1235 Volcano Rd., Mt. View Latitude:19.57002 Longitude:-155.08046 Altitude:436.5 m Parameters:SO2,PM2.5 Established:December 2010 Brief Description: Located on the grounds of the Mt. View Elementary School, this station was established to monitor vog during southerly wind conditions. Ocean View (OV) Location:92-6091 Orchid Mauka Circle, Ocean View Latitude:19.11756 Longitude:-155.77814 Altitude:862.6 m Parameters:SO2,PM2.5 Established:April 2010 Brief Description: This station is located in Hawaii Ocean View Estates at the Ocean View fire station and monitors for volcanic emissions. 13 Pahala (PA) Location:96-3150 Pikake St., Pahala Latitude:19.2039 Longitude:-155.48018 Altitude:320 m Parameters:SO2,PM2.5 Established:August 2007 Brief Description: The station is on the grounds of the Kau High and Pahala Elementary School, monitoring for volcanic emissions. Puna E (PE) Location:13-763 Leilani Ave., Pahoa Latitude:19.46399 Longitude:-154.89871 Altitude:207.9 m Parameters:SO2,H2S Established:March 1991 Brief Description: Located in the Leilani Estates residential subdivision, this station monitors for emissions from the geothermal energy facility approximately 1 mile to the northeast. The station also monitors for SO2 emissions from the volcano during southwesterly wind conditions. 17 Section 4 2015 AIR QUALITY DATA To protect the state’s air quality from degradation, the Department of Health’s Clean Air Branch is responsible for regulating and monitoring pollution sources to ensure that the levels of criteria pollutants remain well below the state and federal ambient air quality standards. Data collected from the ambient air network is validated by the Air Surveillance and Analysis Section to ensure that the reported data is of good quality and meets all quality control and assurance requirements. The monitoring stations in communities near the volcano record higher levels of SO2 and PM2.5, with regular exceedances of the NAAQS for SO2 and occasional exceedances of the NAAQS for PM2.5. The EPA considers the volcano a natural, uncontrollable event and therefore the state is requesting exclusion of these NAAQS exceedances from attainment/non-attainment determination. Excluding the exceedances due to the volcano, in 2015 the State of Hawaii was in attainment of all NAAQS. Explanation of Summary Tables 4-1 through 4-18: x Summaries are by pollutant and averaging period, with the number of occurrences exceeding the NAAQS or, in Table 4-17, the number of exceedances of the state H2S standard (there is no federal H2Sstandard); x The “Maximum” is the highest and second highest valid values recorded in the year for the averaging period. For PM2.5, the maximum and 98 th percentile concentrations are provided and for O3, the 4 th highest daily maximum value is also displayed; x The “Annual Mean” is the arithmetic mean of all valid values recorded in the year; x “Possible Periods” is the total number of possible sampling periods in the year for the averaging period; x “Valid Periods” is the total number of acceptable sampling periods after data validation; x “Percent Recovery” represents the amount of quality data reported; x Attainment with the NAAQS is determined according to 40 CFR 50. Explanation of Tables 4-19 through 4-29: x For each pollutant and averaging period, the highest concentration for each month is presented; x The month with the highest value recorded in the year for each site is highlighted. Table 4-1. 2015 Summary of the 24-Hour PM10 Averages Maximum Annual Mean No. of 24-hour Averages Greater than 150 µg/m 3 1st High 2nd High All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery OAHU Honolulu 36 29 11.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 321 88.0 Kapolei 32 32 15.8 00000000---0 365 334 91.5 Pearl City 46 42 21.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 357 98.0 Table 4-2. Attainment Determination of the 24-Hour PM10 NAAQS Station Exceedances in 2013 Exceedances in 2014 Exceedances in 2015 Sites in violation of the NAAQS Honolulu 0 0 0 0 Kapolei 0 0 0 0 Pearl City 0 0 0 0 Attainment: The standard not to be exceeded more than once per year on average over 3 years. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS.18 Table 4-3.2015 Summary of the 24-Hour PM2.5 Averages: SLAMS Stations Maximum Annual Mean No. of 24-hour Averages Greater than 35 µg/m 3 1st High 98th %All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery OAHU Honolulu 17.3 10.4 3.7 0 00000000000 365 354 97.0 Kapolei 17.4 13.7 4.1 0 00000000000 365 346 94.8 Pearl City 14.0 11.4 5.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 353 97.0 Sand Island 15.7 11.5 5.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 354 97.0 MAUI Kihei 23.3 12.9 4.7 1, 2 000000000000 365 306 83.8 1 Does not meet summary criteria, <75% data recovery in one or more quarters 2 Passed data substitution test Table 4-4. Attainment Determination of the 24-Hour PM2.5 NAAQS: SLAMS Stations Station 2013 98 th value 2014 98 th value 2015 98 th value 3-Year Average Sites in violation of the NAAQS Honolulu 12 10 10 11 0 Kapolei 12 11 14 12 0 Pearl City 13 10 11 12 0 Sand Island 12 10 12 11 0 Kihei 13 10 13 12 0 Attainment: The 3-year average of the 98 th percentile values must be less than or equal to 35 µg/m 3. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Table 4-5.Attainment Determination of the Annual PM2.5 NAAQS: SLAMS Stations Station 2013 Ann. Avg.2014 Ann. Avg.2015 Ann. Avg.3-Year Average Sites in violation of the NAAQS Honolulu 5.3 4.4 3.7 4.5 0 Kapolei 2.8 3.9 4.1 3.6 0 Pearl City 5.5 3.9 5.2 4.9 0 Sand Island 6.2 4.5 5.4 5.4 0 Kihei 5.8 3.9 4.7 4.8 0 Attainment: The 3-year average of annual mean values must be less than 15 µg/m 3. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the annual PM2.5 NAAQS.19 Table 4-6.2015 Summary of the 24-Hour PM2.5 Averages: SPM Stations Maximum Annual Mean No. of 24-hour Averages Greater than 35 µg/m 3 1st High 98 th%All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PossiblePeriods ValidPeriods PercentRecovery HAWAII Hilo 24.8 17.1 5.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 352 96.4 Kona 25.7 23.0 11.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 351 96.2 Mt. View 34.6 13.1 2.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 361 98.9 Ocean View 26.6 22.6 12.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 356 97.5 Pahala 25.9 17.8 7.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 347 95.1 KAUAI Niumalu 13.2 10.1 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 338 92.6 MAUI Kahului 19.8 11.5 5.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 353 346 98.0 Paia 18.7 14.5 4.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 362 99.2 The special purpose stations on Hawaii island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of PM2.5 from volcanic emissions. The special purpose station on Kauai was established to monitor emissions from cruise ships. The special purpose stations on Maui were established to monitor emissions from cane burning. Table 4-7.2015 Summary of the 8-Hour O3 Averages Maximum Annual Mean No. of Daily Maximum 8-Hour Averages Greater than 0.075 ppm 1st High 2nd High 4th High All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery OAHU Sand Island 0.052 0.050 0.049 0.028 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8755 8331 95.2 Kapolei 0.052 0.052 0.049 0.024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8755 8442 96.420 Table 4-8.Attainment Determination of the 8-Hour O3 NAAQS Station 2013 4 th highest 2014 4 th highest 2015 4 th highest 3-Year Average Site in violation of the NAAQS Sand Island 0.047 0.057 0.049 0.051 0 Kapolei 0.051 1 0.046 1 0.049 0.0492 0 Attainment: The 3-year average of the annual 4 th highest daily maximum 8-hour average must be less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 8-hour O3 NAAQS. 1 Does not meet summary criteria, <75% data recovery in year 2 No values from August to December 2013 and January to March 2014, incomplete years Table 4-9.2015 Summary of the 1-Hour and Annual NO2 Averages Maximum 1-hr Annual Mean No. of Daily Maximum 1-Hour Averages Greater than 0.100 ppm 1st High 98th%All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery OAHU SLAMS stations Kapolei 0.031 0.022 0.004 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 8046 92.0 KAUAI SPM Station Niumalu 0.038 0.032 0.002 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 6696 76.4 1, 2 Attainment of the annual NO2 NAAQS: The annual mean shall not exceed 0.053 ppm. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the annual NO2 NAAQS. 1 Does not meet summary criteria, <75% data recovery in one or more quarters 2 Does not pass data substitution test, <50% recovery in one or more quarters Table 4-10.Attainment Determination of the 1-Hour NO2 NAAQS Station 2013 98 th value 2014 98 th value 2015 98 th value 3-Year Average Site in violation of the NAAQS Kapolei 0.023 0.025 0.022 0.023 0 Attainment: The 3-year average of the 98 th percentile values must be less than or equal to 0.100 ppm. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 1-hour NO2 NAAQS.21 4-11. 2015 Summary of the 1-Hour SO2 Averages Maximum Annual Mean No. of 1-hour Averages Greater than 0.075 ppm 1st High 99th%All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery OAHU SLAMS Stations Honolulu 0.013 0.010 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 8135 92.9 Kapolei 0.026 0.013 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 7823 89.3 HAWAII SPM Stations (see NOTE) Hilo 0.640 0.236 0.004 8 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 1 8760 8557 97.7 Kona 0.053 0.031 0.003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 8394 95.8 Mt. View 0.518 0.276 0.004 6 11 2 1 1 0 1 7 2 0 2 3 8760 8496 97.0 Ocean View 0.585 0.382 0.013 6 4 9 11 10 7 9 11 7 13 13 15 8760 8463 96.6 Pahala 0.539 0.496 0.026 16 9 16 20 14 14 15 13 18 20 23 26 8760 8407 96.0 Puna E 0.036 0.015 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 8433 96.3 KAUAI SPM Station Niumalu 0.048 0.014 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 7926 90.5 Attainment: The 3-year average of the 99 th percentile values must be less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. Effective June 2, 2010. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 1-hour SO2 NAAQS (SLAMS stations only). NOTE: The SPM stations on Hawaii Island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of SO2 from volcanic emissions. Although Hilo and Kona stations are designated SLAMS, the values are still mostly attributed to volcanic emissions. Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events and therefore EPA may exclude the exceedances of the 1-hour NAAQS from attainment determinations. The SPM station on Kauai was established to monitor emissions from cruise ships.322 Table 4-12. Attainment Determination of the 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS: SLAMS Stations 2013 99 th value 2014 99 th value 2015 99 th value 3-Year Average Violation of the NAAQS OAHU SLAMS stations N= NO Y= YES Honolulu 0.007 0.006 0.010 0.008 N Kapolei 0.009 0.021 1 0.013 0.014 N HAWAII SPM stations (SEE note) Hilo 0.169 0.144 1 0.236 0.183 Y Kona 0.042 0.035 0.031 0.036 N Mt. View 0.248 0.312 0.276 0.279 Y Ocean View 0.466 0.379 0.382 0.409 Y Pahala 0.757 0.444 0.496 0.565 Y Puna E 0.016 0.034 0.015 0.022 N KAUAI SPM station Niumalu 0.025 0.036 0.014 0.025 N Attainment: The 3-year average of the 99 th percentile values must be less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. Effective June 2, 2010. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 1-hour SO2 NAAQS (SLAMS stations only). NOTE: The SPM stations on Hawaii Island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of SO2 from volcanic emissions. Although Hilo and Kona stations are designated SLAMS, the values are still mostly attributed to volcanic emissions. Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events and therefore EPA may exclude the exceedances of the 1-hour NAAQS from attainment determinations. The SPM station on Kauai was established to monitor emissions from cruise ships. 1 Does not meet summary criteria, < 75% data recovery in one or more quarters23 Table 4-13.2015 Summary of the 3-Hour SO2 Averages Maximum Annual Mean No. of 3-hour Averages Greater than 0.5 ppm 1st High 2nd High All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PossiblePeriods ValidPeriods PercentRecovery OAHU SLAMS stations Honolulu 0.007 0.007 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2642 90.5 Kapolei 0.015 0.011 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2542 87.1 HAWAII SPM stations (see NOTE) Hilo 0.472 0.370 0.004 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2742 93.9 Kona 0.049 0.028 0.003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2681 91.8 Mt. View 0.294 0.173 0.004 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2733 93.6 Ocean View 0.293 0.283 0.013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2710 92.8 Pahala 0.423 0.364 0.026 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2694 92.3 Puna E 0.025 0.013 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2656 91.0 KAUAI SPM station Niumalu 0.021 0.011 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2920 2515 86.1 Attainment: 3-hour values not to exceed 0.5 ppm more than once per year. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 3-hour SO2 NAAQS (SLAMS stations only). NOTE: The SPM stations on Hawaii island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of SO2 from volcanic emissions. Although Hilo and Kona stations are designated SLAMS, the values are still mostly attributed to volcanic emissions. Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events and therefore EPA may exclude the exceedances of the 3-hour NAAQS from attainment determinations.24 Table 4-14. 2015 Summary of the 24-Hour and Annual SO2 Averages Maximum Annual Mean No. of 24-hour Averages Greater than 0.140 ppm 1st High 2nd High All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery OAHU SLAMS Stations Honolulu 0.003 0.002 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 341 93.4 Kapolei 0.004 0.004 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 339 92.9 HAWAII SPM Stations (see NOTE) Hilo 0.160 0.074 0.004 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 365 100.0 Kona 0.017 0.010 0.003 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 354 97.0 Mt. View 0.071 0.054 0.004 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 359 98.4 Ocean View 0.079 0.067 0.013 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 359 98.4 Pahala 0.140 0.094 0.026 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 354 97.0 Puna E 0.007 0.004 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 361 98.9 KAUAI SPM Station Niumalu 0.005 0.005 0.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 324 88.8 Attainment: 24-hour values not to exceed 0.14 ppm more than once per year. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment of the state 24-hour SO2 standard (SLAMS stations only). NOTE: The SPM stations on Hawaii island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of SO2 from volcanic emissions. Although Hilo and Kona stations are designated SLAMS, the values are still mostly attributed to volcanic emissions. Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events and therefore EPA may exclude the exceedances of the 24-hour NAAQS from attainment determinations. Attainment: Annual average (from SLAMS stations only) not to exceed 0.03 ppm. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment of the state annual SO2 standard. NOTE: The SPM stations on Hawaii island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of SO2 from volcanic emissions. Although Hilo and Kona stations are designated SLAMS, the values are still mostly attributed to volcanic emissions. Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events and therefore EPA may exclude the exceedances of the annual NAAQS from attainment determinations.25 Table 4-15.2015 Summary of the 1-Hour CO Averages Maximum Annual Mean No. of 1-hour Averages Greater than 35 ppm 1st High 2nd High All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery OAHU SLAMS stations Honolulu 1.4 1.3 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 8124 92.7 Kapolei 2.4 2.1 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 7709 88.0 Attainment: 1-hour values not to exceed 35 ppm more than once per year. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 1-hour CO NAAQS. Table 4-16.2015 Summary of the 8-Hour CO Averages Maximum Annual Mean No. of 8-hour Averages Greater than 9 ppm 1st High 2nd High All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery OAHU SLAMS stations Honolulu 1.0 1.0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8755 8194 93.6 Kapolei 1.7 1.6 0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8755 7486 85.5 Attainment: 8-hour values not to exceed 9 ppm more than once per year. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment with the 8-hour CO NAAQS. Table 4-17. 2015 Summary of the 1-Hour H2SAverages(StateStandard) Maximum Annual Mean No. of 1-hour Averages Greater than 0.025 ppm 1st High 2nd High All Hours Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent Recovery HAWAII Puna E 0.004 0.003 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8760 8277 94.5 Attainment of the state standard: 1-hour values not to exceed 0.025 ppm. In 2015, Hawaii was in attainment of the state 1-hour H2S standard.26 Table 4-18. 2015 Summary of the Rolling 3-Month Lead Averages Maximum Annual Mean No. of 3-Month Averages Greater than 0.15 µg/m 3 1st High 2nd High All Hours Rolling 3-Month period ending in the month of Possible Periods Valid Periods Percent RecoveryJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep Oct Nov Dec HAWAII Kapolei 0.002 0.001 0.001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 61 53 86.9 Attainment: Maximum 3-month average concentration for a 3-year period must be less than or equal to 0.15 µg/m 3. Note: Sampling for lead conducted 1 in 6 days. Sampling began 1/1/2012. Table 4-19.2015 Monthly Maximum of 24-Hour PM10 Values (µg/m3) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The state and federal 24-hr PM10 standard is 150 µg/m 3 Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Honolulu 24 36 16 24 27 14 14 15 11 12 25 25 Kapolei 24 32 26 26 29 18 21 26 21 27 27 22 Pearl City 33 39 37 46 40 27 29 30 30 26 28 3327 Table 4-20.2015 Monthly Maximum of 24-Hour PM2.5 Values (µg/m 3) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The federal 24-hr PM2.5 standard is 35 µg/m 3 Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec SLAMS Stations Honolulu 17 14 6 8 12 5 10 6 8 12 8 6 Kapolei 71010 7 7 2 4 5 1117 16 13 Pearl City 14 13 12 11 11 9 10 8 9 9 10 8 Sand Island 16 16 11 11 9 11 8 7 12 11 9 9 Kihei 23 12 11 9 12 9 11 14 11 20 16 10 SPM Stations Niumalu (cruise ships)11 13 11 11 11 7 6 4 5 6 2 10 Hilo (volcano)25 21 19 10 10 5 6 8 15 6 10 6 Kahului 20 13 9 12 10 7 7 8 8 11 7 13 Kona (volcano)19 20 25 22 16 13 13 15 18 24 25 26 Mt. View (volcano)21 20 12 8 6 3 5 7 12 12 14 35 Ocean View (volcano)25 19 27 21 23 19 23 19 19 25 16 24 Pahala (volcano)26 20 16 12 18 11 11 14 18 14 9 14 Paia (cane burning)17 14 15 12 10 7 19 8 8 17 7 528 Table 4-21.2015 Monthly Maximum of 1-Hour NO2 Values (ppm) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The federal 1-hour standard for NO2 is 0.100 ppm Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Kapolei 0.031 0.026 0.030 0.021 0.022 0.021 0.021 0.018 0.012 0.026 0.024 0.024 Niumalu1 0.029 0.016 0.000 0.027 0.031 0.024 0.017 0.014 0.038 0.022 0.037 0.034 1 Does not meet summary criteria, < 75% data recovery in one or more quarters Table 4-22.2015 Monthly Maximum of 1-Hour CO Values (ppm) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The federal 1-hr CO standard is 35 ppm, the state standard is 9ppm Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Honolulu 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.6 1 1.1 1.3 1 1.3 Kapolei 0.9 0.9 0.9 1 1.1 0.9 0.7 2.4 1.4 1.5 1.4 1.5 Table 4-23.2015 Monthly Maximum of 8-Hour CO Values (ppm) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The federal 8-hr CO standard is 9 ppm, the state standard is 4.4 ppm Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Honolulu 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.8 0.8 1.0 0.9 0.8 Kapolei 0.7 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 1.7 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.529 4-24.2015 Monthly Maximum of 8-Hour O3 Values (ppm) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The federal 8-hr O3 standard is 0.075 ppm Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Sand Island 0.049 0.049 0.048 0.047 0.052 0.030 0.034 0.027 0.039 0.039 0.042 0.041 Kapolei NCore 0.047 0.047 0.049 0.048 0.052 0.035 0.036 0.030 0.036 0.040 0.041 0.043 Table 4-25.2015 Monthly Maximum of 1-Hour SO2 Values (ppm) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The federal 1-hr SO2 standard is 0.075 ppm (75 ppb) Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec SLAMS Stations Honolulu 0.013 0.004 0.005 0.012 0.006 0.010 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.005 0.003 0.004 Kapolei 0.013 0.013 0.016 0.008 0.006 0.007 0.026 0.007 0.009 0.008 0.004 0.009 SPM Stations (seeNOTE) Niumalu (cruise ships) 0.011 0.002 0.014 0.002 0.005 0.002 0.005 0.014 0.015 0.009 0.001 0.048 Hilo (volcano) 0.640 0.215 0.335 0.036 0.009 0.040 0.022 0.128 0.074 0.025 0.088 0.076 Kona (volcano) 0.028 0.011 0.053 0.013 0.014 0.011 0.022 0.031 0.017 0.048 0.019 0.023 Mt. View (volcano) 0.329 0.518 0.191 0.113 0.229 0.027 0.119 0.241 0.187 0.071 0.107 0.269 Ocean View (volcano) 0.382 0.218 0.231 0.323 0.169 0.162 0.243 0.311 0.220 0.585 0.200 0.570 Pahala (volcano) 0.516 0.305 0.368 0.325 0.282 0.319 0.433 0.175 0.382 0.539 0.496 0.527 Puna E (volcano) 0.018 0.036 0.004 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.001 0.005 0.011 0.003 0.001 0.002 NOTE: The SPM stations on Hawaii Island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of SO2 from volcanic emissions. Although Hilo and Kona stations are designated SLAMS, the values are still mostly attributed to volcanic emissions. Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events and therefore EPA may exclude the exceedances of the 1-hour NAAQS from attainment determinations.30 Table 4-26.2015 Monthly Maximum of 3-Hour SO2 Values (ppm) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The state and federal 3-hr SO2 standard is 0.5 ppm Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec SLAMS Stations Honolulu 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.004 0.007 0.007 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.001 0.004 Kapolei 0.011 0.011 0.009 0.005 0.003 0.002 0.015 0.004 0.006 0.004 0.003 0.005 SPM Stations (seeNOTE) Niumalu (cruise ships)0.007 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.002 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.004 0.001 0.021 Hilo (volcano)0.472 0.194 0.275 0.032 0.007 0.034 0.004 0.048 0.050 0.022 0.035 0.040 Kona (volcano)0.025 0.009 0.049 0.011 0.011 0.09 0.021 0.016 0.012 0.025 0.015 0.020 Mt. View (volcano)0.173 0.249 0.106 0.039 0.081 0.013 0.080 0.109 0.099 0.059 0.079 0.138 Ocean View (volcano)0.199 0.102 0.107 0.212 0.136 0.106 0.122 0.283 0.142 0.293 0.103 0.213 Pahala (volcano)0.340 0.192 0.232 0.169 0.155 0.236 0.228 0.120 0.240 0.423 0.331 0.364 Puna E (volcano)0.013 0.025 0.003 0.001 0.010 0.001 0.001 0.004 0.006 0.002 0.001 0.002 NOTE: The SPM stations on Hawaii Island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of SO2 from volcanic emissions. Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events and therefore EPA may exclude the exceedances of the 3-hour NAAQS from attainment determinations.31 Table 4-27.2015 Monthly Maximum of 24-Hour SO2 Values (ppm) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The state and federal 24-hr SO2 standard is 0.14 ppm Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec SLAMS Stations Honolulu 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 Kapolei 0.004 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 SPM Stations (seeNOTE) Niumalu (cruise ships)0.001 0.000 0.005 0.000 0.001 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.000 0.005 Hilo (volcano)0.160 0.033 0.050 0.009 0.005 0.010 0.004 0.013 0.016 0.007 0.008 0.009 Kona (volcano)0.008 0.004 0.017 0.006 0.006 0.004 0.010 0.005 0.005 0.006 0.005 0.010 Mt. View (volcano)0.054 0.071 0.020 0.019 0.021 0.004 0.015 0.029 0.047 0.009 0.034 0.030 Ocean View (volcano)0.065 0.029 0.052 0.079 0.036 0.034 0.040 0.054 0.035 0.067 0.041 0.056 Pahala (volcano)0.140 0.061 0.049 0.058 0.047 0.054 0.061 0.059 0.077 0.078 0.091 0.092 Puna E (volcano)0.004 0.007 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 NOTE: The SPM stations on Hawaii Island were established to monitor ambient air concentrations of SO2 from volcanic emissions. Volcanic eruptions are considered natural events and therefore EPA may exclude the exceedances of the 24-hour NAAQS from attainment determinations. Table 4-28.2015 Monthly Maximum of 1-Hour H2S Values (ppm) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The state 1-hour H2S standard is .025 ppm Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Puna E 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.002 0.001 0.003 0.003 0.001 0.001 Table 4-29.2015 Monthly Maximum of Rolling 3-Month Lead Values (µg/m 3) The month with the highest value in the year is highlighted The federal rolling 3-month lead standard is 0.15 µg/m 3 Station Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Kapolei NCore (1 in 6days)0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.00232 33 Section 5 2015 PM2.5 SPECIATION DATA Atmospheric aerosols are solid or liquid particles suspended in air that come directly from a variety of sources (primary) or are formed by chemical reactions (secondary). Primary and secondary particles tend to have long lifetimes in the atmosphere and can travel longdistances, up to hundreds or perhaps thousands of miles. Sources include dust from roads,construction, and agriculture; combustion particles from motor vehicles, electric utilities andagricultural burning; and particles from natural sources such as the ocean or volcano. Most of the PM2.5 is a combination of the following components: sulfates, nitrates,ammonium, elemental carbon, organic compounds, water and metals. The EPA selectedtarget particulates of interest based on data use objectives, primary constituents of PM2.5,and the capability and availability of current analytical methods. The filter-based speciation sampler collects samples once every 3 days for analyses performed by an EPA contract laboratory. The speciation sampler is located at the Kapolei NCore monitoring station. Table 5-1 lists the parameters measured, highest and second highest values recorded in the year, the annual arithmetic mean of all valid samples and the total number of samples collected in the year. Table 5-2 lists the analysis methods for each parameter. With the exception of lead, there are no ambient air quality standards for the individual components of speciated PM2.5. For more information on EPA’s speciation program, go to: www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/speciepg.html 34 Table 5-1.Annual Summary of PM2.5 Speciation Data Parameter 1st High(µg/m3) 2nd High (µg/m3) Annual Mean (µg/m3) No. of Samples Percent Recovery CARBON Organic Carbon 1.28 1.02 0.3695 82 68 Elemental Carbon 0.384 0.341 0.1144 82 68 METALS Aluminum 0.237 0.174 0.021 94 78 Antimony 0.058 0.043 0.0043 94 78 Arsenic 0.004 0.003 0.0002 94 78 Barium 0.024 0.019 0.0032 94 78 Bromine 0.007 0.006 0.0019 94 78 Cadmium 0.025 0.019 0.0021 94 78 Calcium 0.181 0.115 0.0414 94 78 Cerium 0.059 0.056 0.0019 94 78 Cesium 0.041 0.031 0.0039 94 78 Chlorine 2.08 1.92 0.6218 85 70 Chromium 0.05 0.012 0.0013 94 78 Cobalt 0.003 0.002 0.0005 94 78 Copper 0.007 0.006 0.0007 94 78 Indium 0.036 0.028 0.0036 94 78 Iron 0.186 0.15 0.0295 94 78 Lead 0.013 0.007 0.0006 94 78 Magnesium 0.213 0.2 0.0626 94 78 Manganese 0.003 0.002 0.0002 94 78 Nickel 0.016 0.015 0.0034 94 78 Phosphorus 0.004 0 0 94 78 Potassium 0.127 0.089 0.0267 94 78 Rubidium 0.004 0.003 0.0003 94 78 Selenium 0.003 0.003 0.0003 94 78 Silicon 0.459 0.276 0.0435 94 78 Silver 0.02 0.02 0.0021 94 78 Sodium 1.43 1.2 0.4351 94 78 Strontium 0.005 0.004 0.0006 94 78 Sulfur 2.03 1.57 0.3268 94 78 Tin 0.033 0.03 0.0019 94 78 Titanium 0.011 0.007 0.0014 94 78 Vanadium 0.008 0.005 0.0013 94 78 Zinc 0.012 0.007 0.0008 94 78 Zirconium 0.015 0.012 0.0008 94 78 35 Table 5-1 Continued Parameter 1st High(µg/m3)2nd High(µg/m3)Annual Mean(µg/m3)No. ofSamples PercentRecovery IONS Ammonium Ion 1 0.95 0.085 95 79 Potassium Ion 0.13 0.09 0.039 95 79 Sodium Ion 1.83 1.75 0.534 95 79 Total Nitrate 0.68 0.55 0.206 95 79 Sulfate 5.53 5.08 1.006 95 79 Table 5-2.Speciation Collection and Analysis Methods Parameter Collection Method Analysis Method Carbon URG 300N Quartz Filter Thermal Optical Transmittance Metals Met-One SASS Teflon Filter Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Ions Met-One SASS Nylon Filter Ion Chromatography 36 Section 6 AMBIENT AIR QUALITY TRENDS The following graphs illustrate 5-year trends for PM10,PM2.5,SO2,NO2,O3,andCOfrom 2011 to 2015 at all SLAMS stations monitoring for those pollutants. Figures 6-1 and 6-2 are graphs of the PM10 annual and maximum 24-hour averages. Figure 6-3 is the graph of the PM2.5 annual averages. Attainment of the PM2.5 24-hour standard is based on the 98 th percentile value at each station, which is depicted in Figure 6-4. Figures 6-5 and 6-6 are graphs of the SO2 annual and maximum 24-hour averages. Figure 6-7 and 6-8 shows the annual and maximum 1-hour averages of NO2 compared to the federal NAAQS. Attainment of the 8-hour ozone standard is achieved by averaging 3 years of the fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average concentrations, which must not exceed 0.070 ppm (standard effective October 1, 2015). Figure 6-9 is a graph of the fourth highest daily maximum values recorded at the Sand Island and Kapolei (since 2011) ozone monitoring stations in the past five years. The graphs for 1-hour and 8-hour carbon monoxide (figures 6-10 and 6-11, respectively) represent the maximum 1-hour or 8-hour values recorded in the year. Criteria pollutant levels remain below state and federal ambient air quality standards at all SLAMS stations in the state. 37 Figure 6-1. PM10 Annual Average: 2011-2015 Figure 6-2. PM10 Maximum 24-Hour Average: 2011-2015 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015µg/m3Honolulu Pearl City Kapolei State Standard 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015µg/m3Honolulu Pearl City Kapolei State and Federal Standard 38 Figure 6-3. PM2.5 Annual Average: 2011-2015 Figure 6-4. PM2.5 98th Percentile 24-Hour Average: 2011-2015 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ug/m3Honolulu Sand Island Pearl City Kapolei Kihei Federal Standard 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ug/m3Honolulu Sand Island Pearl City Kapolei Kihei Federal Standard 39 Figure 6-5. SO2 Annual Average: 2011-2015 Figure 6-6. SO2 Maximum 24-Hour Average: 2011-2015 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ppm Honolulu Kapolei Hilo Kona State Standard 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ppm Honolulu Kapolei Hilo Kona State Standard 40 Figure 6-7. NO2 Annual Average: 2011-2015 Figure 6-8. NO2 Maximum 1-Hour Average: 2011-2015 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ppm Kapolei Federal Standard State standard 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ppm Kapolei Federal Standard eff. 1/22/2010 41 Figure 6-9. O3 Fourth Highest Daily Maximum 8-Hour Average: 2011-2015 Figure 6-10. CO Maximum 1-Hour Average: 2011-2015 0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ppm Sand Island Kapolei Federal Standard 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ppm Honolulu Kapolei Federal Standard State standard 42 Figure 6-11. CO Maximum 8-Hour Average: 2011-2015 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015ppm Honolulu Kapolei Federal Standard State standard Exhibit 5: Coastal Zone Management Coastal Zone Management Act (CEST and EA) General requirements Legislation Regulation Federal assistance to applicant agencies for activities affecting any coastal use or resource is granted only when such activities are consistent with federally approved State Coastal Zone Management Act Plans. Coastal Zone Management Act (16 USC 1451-1464), particularly section 307(c) and (d) (16 USC 1456(c) and (d)) 15 CFR Part 930 References https://www.onecpd.info/environmental-review/coastal-zone-management Projects located in the following states must complete this form. Alabama Florida Louisiana Mississippi Ohio Texas Alaska Georgia Maine New Hampshire Oregon Virgin Islands American Samona Guam Maryland New Jersey Pennsylvania Virginia California Hawaii Massachusetts New York Puerto Rico Washington Connecticut Illinois Michigan North Carolina Rhode Island Wisconsin Delaware Indiana Minnesota Northern Mariana Islands South Carolina 1. Is the project located in, or does it affect, a Coastal Zone as defined in your state Coastal Management Plan? Yes à Continue to Question 2. No à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing that the site is not within a Coastal Zone. 2. Does this project include activities that are subject to state review? Yes à Continue to Question 3. No à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination. 3. Has this project been determined to be consistent with the State Coastal Management Program? Yes, with mitigation. à Continue to Question 4. Yes, without mitigation. à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation used to make your determination. No, project must be canceled. Project cannot proceed at this location. 4. Explain in detail the proposed measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. à Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide documentation of the consultation (including the State Coastal Management Program letter of consistency) and any other documentation used to make your determination. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No Please see attached documentation. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT/SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA The Hawaii Coastal Zone Management Program (HCZMP), as formalized in Chapter 205A, HRS, establishes objectives and policies for the preservation, protection, and restoration of natural resources of Hawaii’s coastal zone. The project site is not located in a Special Management Area (SMA). As set forth in Chapter 205A, HRS, this section addresses the project’s relationship to applicable coastal zone management considerations. 1. Recreational Resources Objective: Provide coastal recreational opportunities accessible to the public. Policies: a. Improve coordination and funding of coastal recreational planning and management; and b. Provide adequate, accessible, and diverse recreational opportunities in the coastal zone management area by: (i) Protecting coastal resources uniquely suited for recreational activities that cannot be provided in other areas; (ii) Requiring replacement of coastal resources having significant recreational value including, but not limited to, surfing sites, fishponds, and sand beaches, when such resources will be unavoidably damaged by development; or requiring reasonable monetary compensation to the State for recreation when replacement is not feasible or desirable; (iii) Providing and managing adequate public access, consistent with conservation of natural resources, to and along shorelines with recreational value; (iv) Providing an adequate supply of shoreline parks and other recreational facilities suitable for public recreation; (v) Ensuring public recreational uses of county, state, and federally owned or controlled shoreline lands and waters having recreational value consistent with public safety standards and conservation of natural resources; (vi) Adopting water quality standards and regulating point and nonpoint sources of pollution to protect, and where feasible, restore the recreational value of coastal waters; (vii) Developing new shoreline recreational opportunities, where appropriate, such as artificial lagoons, artificial beaches, and artificial reefs for surfing and fishing; and (viii) Encouraging reasonable dedication of shoreline areas with recreational value for public use as part of discretionary approvals or permits by the land use commission, board of land and natural resources, and requirements of section 46-6. Response: Recreational area needs of the proposed project are anticipated to be addressed through the provision of open space. The project proposes an onsite playground with open space and areas to gather, such as picnic tables, and a community center. Based on its location and development parameters, the project is not anticipated to adversely impact coastal resources, including access to the shoreline. 2. Historic Resources Objective: Protect, preserve, and where desirable, restore those natural and manmade historic and prehistoric resources in the coastal zone management area that are significant in Hawaiian and American history and culture. Policies: a. Identify and analyze significant archaeological resources; b. Maximize information retention through preservation of remains and artifacts or salvage operations; and c. Support state goals for protection, restoration, interpretation, and display of historic resources. Response: As noted previously, a cultural impact assessment was performed for the proposed project to identify and issue recommendations regarding historic, cultural, and archaeological resources. No historic properties affected was determined for the proposed project. In accordance with Section 6E- 43.6, Hawaii Revised Statutes and Chapter 13- 300, Hawaii Administrative Rules, if any significant cultural deposits or human skeletal remains are encountered, work will stop in the immediate vicinity and the applicant will contract the State Historic Preservation Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (SHPD/DLNR). Pursuant to their specific requests, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) will also be notified. 3. Scenic and Open Space Resources Objective: Protect, preserve, and, where desirable, restore, or improve the quality of coastal scenic and open space resources. Policies: a. Identify valued scenic resources in the coastal zone management areas; b. Ensure that new developments are compatible with their environment by designing and locating such developments to minimize the alteration of natural landforms and existing public views to and along the shoreline; c. Preserve, maintain, and where desirable, improve and restore shoreline open space and scenic resources; and d. Encourage the developments that are not coastal dependent to locate in inland areas. Response: The subject property is located in Hilo at elevations up to approximately 91-feet above mean sea level. The proposed project plan will conform to the Hilo Community Development Plan and will be buffered with landscaping and open space areas to mitigate visual impact. View corridors will not be adversely affected by the proposed project, as the subject property is not specifically identified in any county or State plans or studies as containing scenic vistas or view planes. 4. Coastal Ecosystems Objective: Protect valuable coastal ecosystems, including reefs, from disruption and minimize adverse impacts on all coastal ecosystems. Policies: a. Exercise an overall conservation ethic, and practice stewardship, the protection, use, and development of marine and coastal resources; b. Improve the technical basis for natural resource management; c. Preserve valuable coastal ecosystems, including reefs, of significant biological or economic importance; d. Minimize disruption or degradation of coastal water ecosystems by effective regulation of stream diversions, channelization, and similar land and water uses, recognizing competing water needs; and e. Promote water quantity and quality planning and management practices that reflect the tolerance of fresh water and marine ecosystems and maintain and enhance water quality through the development and implementation of point and nonpoint source water pollution control measures. Response: The project site is located approximately 3,400 feet from the shoreline and is not anticipated to affect the coastal ecosystems. With implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs), the proposed project should have minimal long-term adverse effects on the nearby coastal ecosystems. Appropriate BMPs and erosion-control measures will be implemented to ensure that coastal ecosystems are not adversely impacted by construction activities. Project-related drainage system improvements will be designed in accordance with applicable regulatory standards to mitigate potential adverse impacts to surrounding properties. 5. Economic Uses Objective: Provide public or private facilities and improvements important to the State’s economy in suitable locations. Policies: a. Concentrate coastal dependent development in appropriate areas; b. Ensure that coastal dependent development such as harbors and ports, and coastal related development such as visitor industry facilities and energy generating facilities, are located, designed, and constructed to minimize adverse social, visual, and environmental impacts in the coastal zone management area; and c. Direct the location and expansion of coastal dependent developments in areas presently designated and used for such developments and permit reasonable long- term growth at such areas, and permit coastal dependent development outside of presently designated areas when: i. Use of presently designated locations is not feasible; ii. Adverse environmental effects are minimized; and iii. The development is important to the State’s economy. Response: The proposed project is not located at or near the coastline and will, therefore, not involve coastal development. The proposed action does not contravene the objective and policies for economic use. 6. Coastal Hazards Objective: Reduce hazard to life and property from tsunami, storm waves, stream flooding, erosion, subsidence, and pollution. Policies: a. Develop and communicate adequate information about storm wave, tsunami, flood, erosion, subsidence, and point and nonpoint source pollution hazards; b. Control development in areas subject to storm wave, tsunami, flood, erosion, hurricane, wind, subsidence, and point and nonpoint source pollution hazards; c. Ensure that developments comply with requirements of the Federal Flood Insurance Program; and d. Prevent coastal flooding from inland projects. Response: The project site is not within a tsunami or flood zone. Project-related drainage system improvements will be designed in accordance with applicable regulatory standards to mitigate potential adverse impact to surrounding properties. 7. Managing Development Objective: Improve the development review process, communication, and public participation in the management of coastal resources and hazards. Policies: a. Use, implement, and enforce existing law effectively to the maximum extent possible in managing present and future coastal zone development; b. Facilitate timely processing of applications for development permits and resolve overlapping or conflicting permit requirements; and c. Communicate the potential short and long-term impacts of proposed significant costal developments early in their life cycle and in terms understandable to the public to facilitate public participation in the planning and review process. Response: public input was solicited in coordination with the processing of the EA pursuant to the environmental assessment review process. All aspects of development will be conducted in accordance with applicable Federal, State, and County standards. Opportunities for review of the proposed action are offered through the regulatory review process for construction and development permits. 8. Public Participation Objective: Stimulate public awareness, education, and participation in coastal management. Policies: a. Promote public involvement in coastal zone management processes; b. Disseminate information on coastal zone management issues by means of educational materials, published reports, staff contact, and public workshops for persons and organizations concerned with coastal issues, developments, and government activities; and c. Organize workshops, policy dialogues, and site-specific mediations to respond to coastal issues and conflicts. Response: The EA document environmental review process allows opportunity for comment by agencies and the public. 9. Beach Protection Objective: Protect beaches for public use and recreation. Policies: a. Locate new structures inland from the shoreline setback to conserve open space, minimize interference with natural shoreline processes, and minimize loss of improvements due to erosion; b. Prohibit construction of private erosion-protection structures seaward of the shoreline, except when they result in improved aesthetic and engineering solutions to erosion at the sites and do not interfere with existing recreational and waterline activities; and c. Minimize the construction of public erosion-protection structures seaward of the shoreline. Response: The proposed project is situated inland, away from the shoreline (approximately 3,400 feet) and no adverse effect on beach processes is anticipated. Appropriate BMPs will be implemented to mitigate storm water runoff associated with the project and to ensure that downstream and adjoining properties will not be adversely affected. 10. Marine Resources Objective: Promote the protection, use, and development of marine and coastal resources to assure their sustainability. Policies: a. Ensure that the use and development of marine and coastal resources are ecologically and environmentally sound and economically beneficial; b. Coordinate the management of marine and coastal resources and activities to improve effectiveness and efficiency; c. Assert and articulate the interests of the State as a partner with federal agencies in the sound management of ocean resources within the United States exclusive economic zone; d. Promote research, study, and understanding of ocean processes, marine life, and other ocean resources in order to acquire and inventory information necessary to understand how ocean development activities relate to and impact upon ocean and coastal resources; and e. Encourage research and development of new, innovative technologies for exploring, using, or protecting marine and coastal resources. Response: The proposed project is situated inland (approximately 3,400 feet), away from the ocean and no adverse effect on marine or coastal resources is anticipated. Appropriate BMPs and erosion control measures will be implemented to ensure that coastal resources are not adversely impacted by construction activities. In addition to the foregoing objectives and policies, SMA permit review criteria pursuant to Act 224 (2005) provides that: No special management area use permit or special management area minor permit shall be granted for structures that allow artificial light from floodlights, uplights, or spotlights used for decorative or aesthetic purposes when the light: (1) Directly illuminates the shoreline and ocean waters; or (2) Is directed to travel across property boundaries toward the shoreline and ocean waters. The proposed subdivision is not located on or near the shoreline. The preliminary lighting plan for the project will be designated to ensure that no lighting is directed across property boundaries towards the shoreline. PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: NOAA Tsunami Zone Evacuation Map FIGURE NUMBER: 15 Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 3 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................................................................................................... 3 III. HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA .................................................................................................... 4 IV. HYDRAULIC CRITERIA ....................................................................................................... 6 V. CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................... 7 Appendix A: Tax Map ............................................................................................................... A Appendix B: Topographic Survey ........................................................................................... B Appendix C: FEMA FIRM Panel ............................................................................................... C Appendix D: Flood Hazard Assessment Tool Report ............................................................ D Appendix E: Offsite Drainage Map .......................................................................................... E Appendix F: StreamStats Report ............................................................................................ F Appendix G: Preliminary Site Plan ......................................................................................... G Appendix H: HY-8 Culvert Analysis Proposed Conditions ................................................... H Appendix I: HY-8 Culvert Analysis Existing Conditions ......................................................... I Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page 3 I. INTRODUCTION This offsite drainage report and stream study determines the peak flow discharge rate for the proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani affordable housing project at TMK parcels 2-4-025 : 048, 053 and 080. The property has an existing drainage easement which runs through the property to convey offsite runoff from the mauka side of the property to the makai side, prior to draining into County properties above Kapiolani Street with an undeveloped retention basin area. Based on the peak flows determined to flow through the drainage easement, onsite drainage improvements are recommended to accommodate the storm water runoff and allow the site to be developed into the proposed multi-family development. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The properties for the proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani affordable housing project are TMKs: 2-4- 025: 048, 053 and 080. See Appendix A for a Tax Map of the properties involved. Currently the site is a vacant and has a paved and gravel access driveway along the mauka side of the property connecting to Kukuau Road to the north and a long winding driveway to Hualalai Street to the south. The drainage easement runs through the center of the main parcel and consists of Drainage Easement “254” being approximately 3,388 square feet in size and Drainage Easement “253” being approximately 18,059 square feet. Along the mauka portion of the drainage easement, three (3) 36” diameter culverts run underneath the driveway and an unlined channel conveys storm water runoff through the property in the middle of the drainage easement. The site elevations range from 92’ on the mauka side of the easement down to 86’ on the makai side of the drainage easement. See Appendix B for a topographic survey of the properties showing the existing driveway culverts and unlined channel in the drainage easement. The current FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) for the area is panel 155166 0904 Revision F dated September 29, 2017. A copy of the area of interest from the current FIRM panel is attached in Appendix C. This FIRM panel shows the property is fully outside of the regulatory floodplain and within the Zone X (unshaded) floodplain being outside of the 500-year floodplain. An additional Flood Hazard Assessment Report from Hawaii State DLNR for the property is provided in Appendix D. The properties and drainage easement conveying offsite runoff through the site is situated between larger drainageways of the Alenaio Stream to the north and the Waiakea Flood Control Channel to the south. Some adjacent residential properties to the north of the site are shown as being within a Zone X location protected by a Levee on the Alenaio Stream, however the proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani development does not reside within the area protected by the Levee. Even though the properties lie outside the FEMA 500-year floodplain, this report assesses the smaller drainage area and peak runoff flows through the drainage easement in accordance with the County Storm Drainage Standard, dated October 1970 (Drainage Standards). Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page 4 III. HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA The offsite drainage area was obtained using USGS topographic maps available for the offsite areas and the USGS StreamStats tool. The offsite watershed was determined to start up near Kahikini Street by the Hilo Adult Day Center, passing through Komohana Steet down to the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project development site and ending in the undeveloped retention basin area below the project site within County property on the mauka side of Kapiolani Street. See Appendix E for the Offsite Drainage Map. The total offsite drainage area is estimated to be 65 acres with mean elevation of 176 ft. Change in elevations is 269 feet from top to bottom over about 4,800 feet distance. Since the offsite runoff will flow through a culvert within a County drainage easement, the 50-year recurrence interval will be used. Maximum 60 minute precipitation that occurs on average once in 50-years is 6.2 inches per hour per Plate 2. See Appendix F for the StreamStats report summarizing the drainage area and Plate 6 showing the hydrologic information for the offsite watershed area. Based on the County Drainage Standards, the design recurrence interval for the offsite drainage area of 65 acres is the 50 year design storm (for drainage area being less than 100 acres) within a County drainage easement. The 50-year design storm recurrence interval will be used as the basis for the drainage improvements for the drainage easement through the project site. Runoff Coefficient (C) Based on the Drainage Standards, the rational method will be used to estimate the storm runoff for the offsite drainage area being less than 100 acres. The runoff coefficient (C) for the offsite drainage area was estimated based on Table 1 of the Drainage Standards. The offsite drainage area is generally developed and residential in nature with a small drainageway running through the properties. The runoff coefficient is estimated to be: Watershed Characteristics Value Infiltration 0.07 (medium) Relief 0.03 (rolling 5% to 15% grades) Vegetal Cover 0.03 (good 10% to 50%) Development Type 0.40 (residential) Total (Runoff Coefficient) 0.53 The estimated runoff coefficient for the offsite drainage area is calculated to be 0.53. Time of Concentration, Tc The time of concentration is calculated for the overland flow across the offsite areas. The time of concentration will be 30.5 minutes. Refer to Figure 1: Plate 3 – Overland Flow Chart. Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page 5 Figure 1: Plate 3 – Overland Flow Chart Rainfall Intensity for Indicated Durations Based on the Time of Concentration for drainage area, the Rainfall Intensity for the Indicated Duration is calculated based on Plate 4 from the County’s Drainage Standards. The Rainfall Intensities are estimated as shown in Figure 2: Plate 4 – Rainfall Intensities for Indicated Duration. Figure 2: Plate 4 – Rainfall Intensities for Indicated Duration 8.6 IN/HR Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page 6 Using the rational method equation, the peak storm water runoff discharge rates for the offsite drainage area through the drainage easement through the property is calculated as: Area (Acre) 50-year 65.0 0.53 I50i 8.60 Q50 296.27 C Q (cfs) I (in/hr) IV. HYDRAULIC CRITERIA The proposed site development plan for Kaiaulu O Kapiolani is shown in Appendix G. The drainage easement is shown within the middle of the site and is planned to remain as open pavement and parking areas without any building structures. To provide a safe and usable site, a long culvert is planned to be installed underneath the central parking lot drive aisle. An inlet headwall will be installed on the mauka side of the culvert along with an outlet headwall on the makai side of the culvert. The culvert pipes will generally be placed in the same location as the existing unlined channel and replace the existing three (3) 36” diameter culverts on the gravel driveway. It will pass through the middle of the site under the parking lot drive aisle. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) HY-8 culvert modeling software was used to confirm the culvert sizing that would be warranted to pass the offsite drainage through the drainage easement underneath the parking lot drive aisle. Based on the preliminary construction plans, the culvert design is based on a 386.92’ long culvert with 1.24% slope and square headwalls on the inlet and outlet structures. Based on the 50-year design recurrence interval (296.27 cfs peak flow rate), the following culvert configuration will be used for the culvert installation: · Four (4) 36” diameter RCP circular pipe culverts (HDPE pipe culverts also allowable) Since the basis of design is the 50-year recurrence interval, it would be recommended to have the parking lot drive aisle areas above the culvert to be designed as a low spot in the project site to accommodate additional storm water runoff if the culverts overflow due to a higher recurrence rain event or temporary blockage of the culvert(s) by debris. Regular maintenance of the culvert pipes will be required to clear any large debris that doesn’t pass through the culvert. See Appendix H for the HY-8 analysis report. Based on the proposed culvert analysis, a headwater elevation of 97.33’ would occur during the 50-year storm event. For the current existing conditions, see Appendix I for the HY-8 analysis report for the existing three (3) 36” diameter culverts. The existing conditions has an unpaved driveway going overtop of the existing three culverts, which drains into a natural open channel with a relatively flat channel slope. According to the topographic survey, the existing culverts actually have an inverted negative slope (i.e. the inlet inverts are lower than the outlet inverts), however the center culvert has close to the same invert and outlet elevations, so we modeled the existing culvert conditions using a flat culvert slope. Based on the existing culvert analysis, an existing headwater elevation of 97.89’ would occur during the 50-year storm event. The culvert outlet will have flow velocities of 12 feet per second, and outlet protection shall be provided in the final construction plan design, that can accommodate the flow velocities. Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page 7 V. CONCLUSION The offsite watershed area passing through the proposed project drainage easement has been assessed and a range of culvert options are proposed to convey the design 50-year recurrence interval storm offsite runoff through the site. The proposed culvert conditions would decrease the anticipated headwater elevation slightly compared to the existing culvert headwater elevations, so there would not be adverse impacts or additional ponding to the upstream lot. The culvert options would safely convey the design peak storm water runoff and not cause adverse impacts to neighboring adjacent properties. It is recommended that the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani development provide onsite stormwater provisions to convey runoff into this culvert within the drainage easement either by surface flow into drain inlets above the culvert, or underground storm drain lines to tie into the sidewalls of the culvert with a 45-degree angle in the downstream flow direction. Drywells could be installed within the project site or below the invert of the new culvert (if a box culvert option was selected) to help infiltrate stormwater runoff and mitigate developmental increase in storm water runoff anticipated due to the impervious surfaces added for the proposed development. Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page A Appendix A: Tax Map Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page B Appendix B: Topographic Survey Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page C Appendix C: FEMA FIRM Panel Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page D Appendix D: Flood Hazard Assessment Tool Report Flood Hazard Assessment Report Disclaimer: The Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) assumes no responsibility arising from the use, accuracy, completeness, and Ɵmeliness of any informaƟon contained in this report. Viewers/Users are responsible for verifying the accuracy of the informaƟon and agree to indemnify the DLNR, its oĸcers, and employ-ees from any liability which may arise from its use of its data or informaƟon. If this map has been idenƟĮed as 'PRELIMINARY', please note that it is being provided for informaƟonal purposes and is not to be used for Ňood insurance raƟng. Contact your county Ňoodplain manager for Ňood zone determina- Ɵons to be used for compliance with local Ňoodplain management regulaƟons. Property InformaƟon COUNTY: FIRM INDEX DATE: THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN A TSUNAMI EVACUTION ZONE: FOR MORE INFO, VISIT: hƩp://www.scd.hawaii.gov/ THIS PROPERTY IS WITHIN A DAM EVACUATION ZONE: FOR MORE INFO, VISIT: http://dlnreng.hawaii.gov/dam/ Flood Hazard InformaƟon SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD - The 1% annual chance Ňood (100- year), also know as the base Ňood, is the Ňood that has a 1% chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. SFHAs include Zone A, AE, AH, AO, V, and VE. The Base Flood ElevaƟon (BFE) is the water surface elevaƟon of the 1% annual chance Ňood. Mandatory Ňood insurance purchase applies in these zones: Zone A: No BFE determined. Zone AE: BFE determined. Zone AH: Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually areas of ponding); BFE determined. Zone AO: Flood depths of 1 to 3 feet (usually sheet Ňow on sloping terrain); average depths determined. Zone V: Coastal Ňood zone with velocity hazard (wave acƟon); no BFE determined. Zone VE: Coastal Ňood zone with velocity hazard (wave acƟon); BFE determined. Zone AEF: Floodway areas in Zone AE. The Ňoodway is the channel of stream plus any adjacent Ňoodplain areas that must be kept free of encroachment so that the 1% annual chance Ňood can be carried without increasing the BFE. NON-SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA - An area in a low-to-moderate risk Ňood zone. No mandatory Ňood insurance purchase requirements apply, but coverage is available in parƟcipaƟng communiƟes. Zone XS (X shaded): Areas of 0.2% annual chance Ňood; areas of 1% annual chance Ňood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance Ňood. Zone X: Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance Ňoodplain. OTHER FLOOD AREAS Zone D: Unstudied areas where Ňood hazards are undeter- mined, but Ňooding is possible. No mandatory Ňood insurance purchase apply, but coverage is available in parƟcipaƟng commu- niƟes. FLOOD HAZARD ASSESSMENT TOOL LAYER LEGEND (Note: legend does not correspond with NFHL) www.hawaiinfip.org Notes: BASEMAP: FIRM BASEMAP 0 200 400 ft HAWAII TMK NO:(3) 2-4-025:048 WATERSHED:WAILOA PARCEL ADDRESS:KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI HILO, HI 96720 SEPTEMBER 29, 2017 LETTER OF MAP CHANGE(S):NONE FEMA FIRM PANEL:1551660904F PANEL EFFECTIVE DATE:SEPTEMBER 29, 2017 NO NO Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page E Appendix E: Offsite Drainage Map Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page F Appendix F: StreamStats Report A study area is needed before viewing the report Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Offsite Drainage Analysis Osite Drainage Area and Hydrology determined by USGS StreamStats topographic analysis and regression equations. Basin Characteristics Parameter Code Parameter Description Value Unit BASINPERIM Perimeter of the drainage basin as defined in SIR 2004-5262 2.59 miles BSLDEM10M Mean basin slope computed from 10 m DEM 6.61 percent CENTROIDY Basin centroid vertical (y) location in state plane units 2184142.9 meters COMPRAT A measure of basin shape related to basin perimeter and drainage area 2.28 dimensionless CSL10_85 Change in elevation divided by length between points 10 and 85 percent of distance along main channel to basin divide - main channel method not known 269 feet per mi DRNAREA Area that drains to a point on a stream 0.1 square miles ELEV Mean Basin Elevation 176 feet ELEV10FT Elevation at 10 percent from outlet along longest flow path slope using DEM 92.8 feet ELEV10FT3D Elevation at 10 percent from outlet along longest flow path slope using 3D line 92.6 feet ELEV85FT Elevation at 85 percent from outlet along longest flow path slope using DEM 293 feet ELEV85FT3D Elevation at 85 percent from outlet along longest flow path slope using 3D line 293 feet ELEVMAX Maximum basin elevation 345 feet I24H100Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 100 years 22.2 inches I24H10Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 10 years 14.2 inches I24H25Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 25 years 17.3 inches I24H2Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 2 years - Equivalent to precipitation intensity index 9.28 inches I24H500Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 500 years 28.4 inches I24H50Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 50 years 19.7 inches I24H5Y Maximum 24-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 5 years 12 inches I48H100Y Maximum 48-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 100 years 28.9 inches I48H10Y Maximum 48-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 10 years 18.8 inches I48H25Y Maximum 48-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 25 years 22.7 inches I48H2Y Maximum 48-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 2 years 12.3 inches I48H500Y Maximum 48-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 500 years 36.6 inches I48H50Y Maximum 48-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 50 years 25.8 inches I48H5Y Maximum 48-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 5 years 16 inches I60M100Y Maximum 60-min precipitation that occurs on average once in 100 years 4.35 inches I60M10Y Maximum 60-min precipitation that occurs on average once in 10 years 3.13 inches I60M25Y Maximum 60-min precipitation that occurs on average once in 25 years 3.63 inches I60M2Y Maximum 60-min precipitation that occurs on average once in 2 years 2.2 inches I60M500Y Maximum 60-min precipitation that occurs on average once in 500 years 5.16 inches I60M50Y Maximum 60-min precipitation that occurs on average once in 50 years 4 inches I60M5Y Maximum 60-min precipitation that occurs on average once in 5 years 2.74 inches I6H100Y 6-hour precipitation that is expected to occur on average once in 100 years 11.7 inches I6H10Y Maximum 6-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 10 years 7.86 inches I6H25Y Maximum 6-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 25 years 9.36 inches I6H2Y Maximum 6-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 2 years 5.25 inches I6H500Y Maximum 6-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 500 years 14.5 inches I6H50Y Maximum 6-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 50 years 10.5 inches I6H5Y Maximum 6-hour precipitation that occurs on average once in 5 years 6.73 inches IMPNLCD01 Percentage of impervious area determined from NLCD 2001 impervious dataset 42.2 percent LC01BARE Percentage of area barren land, NLCD 2001 category 31 0 percent LC01CROP Percentage of area crop, NLCD 2001 category 0 percent LC01DEV Percentage of land-use from NLCD 2001 classes 21-24 93.9 percent LC01DEVHI Percentage of area developed, high intensity, NLCD 2001 category 24 0 percent LC01DEVMD Percentage of area developed, medium intensity, NLCD 2001 category 23 44 percent LC01EVERG Percentage of area evergreen forest, NLCD 2001 category 42 4 percent LC01OPNLO Percentage of area developed, open space and low intensity combined, NLCD2001 cat. 21 and 22 51 percent LFPLENGTH Length of longest flow path 0.99 miles MINBELEV Minimum basin elevation 86.1 feet PERM12IN Area-weighted average soil permeability for top 12 inches of soil 5.02 inches per hour PERM24IN Area-weighted average soil permeability for top 24 inches of soil 3.41 inches per hour PRECIP Mean Annual Precipitation 146 inches RELIEF Maximum - minimum elevation 259 feet RELRELF Basin relief divided by basin perimeter 100 feet per mi SLOP30_10M Percent area with slopes greater than 30 percent from 10-meter NED 0 percent SLPFM3D Change in elevation divided by length between points 10 and 85 percent of distance along the longest flow path to the basin divide, LFP from 3D grid 260 feet per mi General Disclaimers Parameter values have been edited, computed flows may not apply. Upstream regulation was checked for this watershed. This watershed is percent regulated, computed flows may not apply. This watershed has been edited, computed flows may not apply. The resulting delineations are derived from digital elevation data and storm drain vectors that have been processed to enforce drainage through storm drains. Region ID:HI Workspace ID:HI20200204194408506000 Clicked Point (Latitude, Longitude):19.71480, -155.08595 Time:2020-02-04 09:44:28 -1000 Project Site I50=6.2 inches/hour Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page G Appendix G: Preliminary Site Plan E ADABADA B1789101112131415 1617181920212226 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 48 49 50 51 52 40 82 39 41 53 78 54 85 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 6463 42 97 4544 46 100 47 103 65 43 99 66 69 70 71 72 68 67 74 75 113 76 77 73 79 80 81 PARKING COUNT 9x18 108 ADA VAN 6 TOTAL 114 84 2586 87 83 90 91 9289 93 95 96 98 94 101102 105 106 107 108 104 110 112111109 114 CADA2324D ADA COMM. CTR.ES4S4S4 S4S4S4 S4 S6S6 S4S4S4 S2 S2S8S8S8 W6 W6W6W6 W6 W6W6W4 W4 W4 W4W6WW6 W6W4W4W4 W4W4W4°°°°°°W4W4 W4 W4 D36 D36 D36 D36 D36 D36 D36 89 11532 456D36 Sheet No ____ of _____ Drawing Number Drawn Checked Designed Drawing Title Project NumberProject NameRevision Number/DescriptionDate This work was prepared by me or under my supervision and will be under my observation. construction of this project Expiration Date of the License Signature Partners Incorporated Design Architecture Planning Interiors Design 2 3 4 5 D C B A 1 2 3 4 51 X C2.1 18056 AUG 2020 JKO DTI DTI X SITE LAYOUT PLANA0705 HILO LPKaiaulu O Kapiolani-TMK : 2-4-025:48,53,80(POR)April 30, 2020 PROVIDE OUTLET PROTECTION BASED ON CULVERT FLOW VELOCITIES OF 12 FEET PER SECOND IN FINAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN DESIGNS Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page H Appendix H: HY-8 Culvert Analysis Proposed Conditions HY-8 Culvert Analysis Report Crossing Discharge Data Discharge Selection Method: Specify Minimum, Design, and Maximum Flow Minimum Flow: 146.42 cfs Design Flow: 296.27 cfs Maximum Flow: 300 cfs Proposed Culvert Conditions Table 1 - Summary of Culvert Flows at Crossing: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Headwater Elevation (ft) Total Discharge (cfs)Culverts Discharge (cfs) Roadway Discharge (cfs) Iterations 94.07 146.42 146.42 0.00 1 94.31 161.78 161.78 0.00 1 94.57 177.14 177.14 0.00 1 94.84 192.49 192.49 0.00 1 95.14 207.85 207.85 0.00 1 95.46 223.21 223.21 0.00 1 95.80 238.57 238.57 0.00 1 96.17 253.93 253.93 0.00 1 96.57 269.28 269.28 0.00 1 97.33 296.27 296.27 0.00 1 97.43 300.00 299.67 0.17 14 97.42 299.33 299.33 0.00 Overtopping Rating Curve Plot for Crossing: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Table 2 - Culvert Summary Table: Culverts Total Discharge (cfs) Culvert Discharge (cfs) Headwater Elevation (ft) Inlet Control Depth (ft) Outlet Control Depth (ft) Flow Type Normal Depth (ft) Critical Depth (ft) Outlet Depth (ft) Tailwater Depth (ft) Outlet Velocity (ft/s) Tailwater Velocity (ft/s) 146.42 146.42 94.07 3.072 0.0*5-S2n 1.485 1.967 1.500 1.452 10.354 7.332 161.78 161.78 94.31 3.312 0.0*5-S2n 1.576 2.071 1.576 1.523 10.750 7.528 177.14 177.14 94.57 3.567 0.0*5-S2n 1.666 2.168 1.666 1.590 10.986 7.711 192.49 192.49 94.84 3.841 0.912 5-S2n 1.756 2.259 1.756 1.654 11.198 7.883 207.85 207.85 95.14 4.137 1.466 5-S2n 1.846 2.344 1.846 1.714 11.388 8.044 223.21 223.21 95.46 4.456 2.056 5-S2n 1.938 2.423 1.952 1.773 11.457 8.196 238.57 238.57 95.80 4.800 2.682 5-S2n 2.032 2.495 2.032 1.829 11.702 8.340 253.93 253.93 96.17 5.171 3.345 5-S2n 2.130 2.561 2.156 1.882 11.675 8.478 269.28 269.28 96.57 5.568 4.043 5-S2n 2.234 2.620 2.234 1.934 11.925 8.609 296.27 296.27 97.33 6.329 5.356 5-S2n 2.446 2.708 2.446 2.021 12.004 8.825 300.00 299.67 97.43 6.430 5.530 5-S2n 2.478 2.718 2.478 2.033 12.000 8.854 ******************************************************************************** Straight Culvert Inlet Elevation (invert): 91.00 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 86.20 ft Culvert Length: 386.95 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0124 ******************************************************************************** Culvert Performance Curve Plot: Culverts Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Culverts Site Data - Culverts Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data Inlet Station: 0.00 ft Inlet Elevation: 91.00 ft Outlet Station: 386.92 ft Outlet Elevation: 86.20 ft Number of Barrels: 4 Culvert Data Summary - Culverts Barrel Shape: Circular Barrel Diameter: 3.00 ft Barrel Material: Concrete Embedment: 0.00 in Barrel Manning's n: 0.0130 Culvert Type: Straight Inlet Configuration: Square Edge with Headwall Inlet Depression: None Table 3 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani) Flow (cfs)Water Surface Elev (ft) Depth (ft)Velocity (ft/s)Shear (psf)Froude Number 146.42 87.65 1.45 7.33 2.94 1.33 161.78 87.72 1.52 7.53 3.09 1.33 177.14 87.79 1.59 7.71 3.22 1.34 192.49 87.85 1.65 7.88 3.35 1.35 207.85 87.91 1.71 8.04 3.48 1.36 223.21 87.97 1.77 8.20 3.59 1.36 238.57 88.03 1.83 8.34 3.71 1.37 253.93 88.08 1.88 8.48 3.82 1.37 269.28 88.13 1.93 8.61 3.92 1.38 296.27 88.22 2.02 8.83 4.10 1.39 300.00 88.23 2.03 8.85 4.12 1.39 Tailwater Channel Data - Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Tailwater Channel Option: Trapezoidal Channel Bottom Width: 6.50 ft Side Slope (H:V): 5.00 (_:1) Channel Slope: 0.0325 Channel Manning's n: 0.0350 Channel Invert Elevation: 86.20 ft Roadway Data for Crossing: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Roadway Profile Shape: Constant Roadway Elevation Crest Length: 55.00 ft Crest Elevation: 97.42 ft Roadway Surface: Paved Roadway Top Width: 375.00 ft Stream Study Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Page I Appendix I: HY-8 Culvert Analysis Existing Conditions HY-8 Culvert Analysis Report Crossing Discharge Data Discharge Selection Method: Specify Minimum, Design, and Maximum Flow Minimum Flow: 146.42 cfs Design Flow: 296.27 cfs Maximum Flow: 300 cfs Existing Culvert Conditions Table 1 - Summary of Culvert Flows at Crossing: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Headwater Elevation (ft) Total Discharge (cfs)Culverts Discharge (cfs) Roadway Discharge (cfs) Iterations 94.80 146.42 146.42 0.00 1 95.20 161.78 161.78 0.00 1 95.64 177.14 177.14 0.00 1 96.14 192.49 192.49 0.00 1 96.68 207.85 207.85 0.00 1 97.27 223.21 223.21 0.00 1 97.52 238.57 229.45 9.00 8 97.64 253.93 232.39 21.42 6 97.74 269.28 234.79 34.31 5 97.89 296.27 238.38 57.75 5 97.91 300.00 238.83 61.07 4 97.36 225.53 225.53 0.00 Overtopping Rating Curve Plot for Crossing: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Table 2 - Culvert Summary Table: Culverts Total Discharge (cfs) Culvert Discharge (cfs) Headwater Elevation (ft) Inlet Control Depth (ft) Outlet Control Depth (ft) Flow Type Normal Depth (ft) Critical Depth (ft) Outlet Depth (ft) Tailwater Depth (ft) Outlet Velocity (ft/s) Tailwater Velocity (ft/s) 146.42 146.42 94.80 3.910 3.922 7-H2c -1.000 2.274 2.274 1.624 8.489 4.479 161.78 161.78 95.20 4.315 4.231 7-JH2c -1.000 2.385 2.385 1.709 8.950 4.606 177.14 177.14 95.64 4.764 4.559 7-JH2t -1.000 2.484 2.484 1.790 9.436 4.724 192.49 192.49 96.14 5.258 4.914 7-H2t -1.000 2.572 2.572 1.866 9.950 4.834 207.85 207.85 96.68 5.800 5.240 7-H2t -1.000 2.648 2.648 1.940 10.495 4.938 223.21 223.21 97.27 6.387 5.583 7-H2t -1.000 2.712 2.712 2.010 11.071 5.035 238.57 229.45 97.52 6.639 5.729 7-H2t -1.000 2.735 2.735 2.078 11.314 5.128 253.93 232.39 97.64 6.760 5.799 7-H2t -1.000 2.745 2.745 2.143 11.429 5.216 269.28 234.79 97.74 6.861 5.858 7-H2t -1.000 2.753 2.753 2.206 11.524 5.300 296.27 238.38 97.89 7.012 5.946 7-H2t -1.000 2.765 2.765 2.312 11.666 5.439 300.00 238.83 97.91 7.031 5.957 7-H2t -1.000 2.766 2.766 2.326 11.684 5.457 ******************************************************************************** Straight Culvert Inlet Elevation (invert): 90.88 ft, Outlet Elevation (invert): 90.88 ft Culvert Length: 20.00 ft, Culvert Slope: 0.0000 ******************************************************************************** Culvert Performance Curve Plot: Culverts Water Surface Profile Plot for Culvert: Culverts Site Data - Culverts Site Data Option: Culvert Invert Data Inlet Station: 0.00 ft Inlet Elevation: 90.88 ft Outlet Station: 20.00 ft Outlet Elevation: 90.88 ft Number of Barrels: 3 Culvert Data Summary - Culverts Barrel Shape: Circular Barrel Diameter: 3.00 ft Barrel Material: Concrete Embedment: 0.00 in Barrel Manning's n: 0.0130 Culvert Type: Straight Inlet Configuration: Square Edge with Headwall Inlet Depression: None Table 3 - Downstream Channel Rating Curve (Crossing: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani) Flow (cfs)Water Surface Elev (ft) Depth (ft)Velocity (ft/s)Shear (psf)Froude Number 146.42 92.50 1.62 4.48 0.94 0.73 161.78 92.59 1.71 4.61 0.99 0.74 177.14 92.67 1.79 4.72 1.04 0.74 192.49 92.75 1.87 4.83 1.08 0.75 207.85 92.82 1.94 4.94 1.13 0.75 223.21 92.89 2.01 5.04 1.17 0.76 238.57 92.96 2.08 5.13 1.21 0.76 253.93 93.02 2.14 5.22 1.24 0.76 269.28 93.09 2.21 5.30 1.28 0.76 296.27 93.19 2.31 5.44 1.34 0.77 300.00 93.21 2.33 5.46 1.35 0.77 Tailwater Channel Data - Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Tailwater Channel Option: Trapezoidal Channel Bottom Width: 12.00 ft Side Slope (H:V): 5.00 (_:1) Channel Slope: 0.0093 Channel Manning's n: 0.0350 Channel Invert Elevation: 90.88 ft Roadway Data for Crossing: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Roadway Profile Shape: Constant Roadway Elevation Crest Length: 55.00 ft Crest Elevation: 97.36 ft Roadway Surface: Gravel Roadway Top Width: 10.00 ft Exhibit 6: Contamination and Toxic Substances PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Hilo, Hawaii TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, (3) 2-4-025:080 Prepared for: A0705 Hilo, L.P. 2000 E. Fourth Street Ste 220 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Prepared by: Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, HI 96826 February 2019 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: TOC February 2019 Page: i of iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS a-1 ES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 Purpose 1-1 1.2 Scope 1-2 1.3 Site Location 1-3 1.4 Current Use of the Subject Property 1-3 1.5 Current Use of Adjacent Properties 1-3 2 HISTORICAL LAND USE 2-1 2.1 Historical Information Sources 2-1 2.2 Historical Aerial Photographs 2-1 2.3 EDR Supplemental Search for Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps 2-3 2.4 EDR City Directory Abstract 2-4 2.5 EDR Historical Topographic Maps 2-5 2.6 Tier 1 Vapor Encroachment Screening 2-6 2.7 Land Leases and Ownership 2-6 2.8 Previous Investigations 2-7 2.9 Interviews 2-7 2.10 Records Review 2-8 2.11 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations 2-9 2.12 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues 2-9 3 SITE CONDITIONS 3-1 3.1 Soil Classifications 3-1 3.2 Groundwater Hydrology 3-1 3.3 Topography and Land Cover 3-1 3.4 Local Zoning 3-2 3.5 Flood Zone Determination 3-2 4 SITE RECONNAISSANCE 4-1 i Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: TOC February 2019 Page: ii of iii 4.1 General Observations of the Site 4-1 4.2 General Observations of the Surrounding Area 4-2 4.3 PCB-Containing Equipment 4-2 4.4 Asbestos Containing Materials and Lead Paint 4-2 4.5 Arsenic 4-3 5 REVIEW OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LISTS AND AVAILABLE FILES OF REPORTED HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES/PETROLEUM PRODUCT SOURCES AND RELEASES 5-1 5.1 Databases and Regulatory Files Reviewed 5-1 5.2 Results of Database Review and Regulatory Agency Contacts 5-4 5.2.1 Results for Subject Site 5-4 5.2.2 Results for Properties within the Vicinity of the Subject Site 5-4 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1 7 DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAPS 7-1 8 REPORT LIMITATIONS 8-1 9 REFERENCES 9-1 ii Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: TOC February 2019 Page: iii of iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Map 1-5 Figure 2: TMK Map 1-6 Figure 3: Underground Injection Control Map 3-3 APPENDICES Appendix A: Environmental Professional Qualifications Appendix B: Aerial Photographs Appendix C: EDR Report, Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, Historical Topographic Maps, Historical Aerial Photographs and City Directory Appendix D: Bureau of Conveyance Documentation Appendix E: Interview Documentation Appendix F: Hawaii Electric Light Company Transformer Documentation Appendix G: Site Reconnaissance Photographs iii Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: Acronyms February 2019 Page: 1 of 2 ACRONYMS ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 DOD Department of Defense EAL Environmental Action Level EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc. ERA Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC ESA Environmental Site Assessment HDOH Hawai‘i Department of Health HEER HDOH Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response INST CONTROL institutional controls LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank NFA no further action NPL National Priorities List PCB polychlorinated biphenyl PAH polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRA-LQG Resource Conservation and Recovery Act – large quantity generators RCRA-SQG Resource Conservation and Recovery Act – small quantity generators RCRA-TSDF Resource Conservation and Recovery Act – treatment, storage, and disposal facilities REC Recognized Environmental Condition SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System SHWB Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch SHWS State Hazardous Waste Sites List TMK Tax Map Key TPH Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons UIC Underground Injection Control USDA United States Department of Agriculture USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency a-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: Acronyms February 2019 Page: 2 of 2 USGS United States Geological Survey UST Underground Storage Tank a-2 QUALIFICATIONS AND SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS The undersigned environmental professional was responsible for conducting and preparing the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment for the property designated by Tax Map Keys TMK (3) 2- 4-025:048, 053 & 080 located in Hilo, Hawaii. I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40CFR312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I have developed and performed all the appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40CFRPart312. Environmental professional qualifications are provided in Appendix A. Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Prepared By: Name: Vincent Yanagita Title: Senior Project Manager Reviewed By: Name: Russell Okoji Title: Principal Scientist Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: ES February 2019 Page: 1 of 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the request of A0705 Hilo, L.P., Environmental Risk Analysis LLC (ERA) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for an undeveloped property located in Hilo, Hawaii (hereafter referred to as the Site). The Site is located on the west side of the island of Hawaii and is designated as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080. The purpose of this ESA was to identify, to the extent feasible, Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) associated with the Site. The investigation included a physical inspection of the property; review of current regulatory environmental database information; interviews of persons knowledgeable about the property, review of historical records; and preparation of this Phase I ESA Report. This ESA report conforms to the format outlined in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Document E1527-13 and the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) All Appropriate Inquiries Rule. The site reconnaissance visit was conducted by Mr. Max Ulloa on February 10, 2019. FINDINGS The Site was located at an open, undeveloped, and heavily wooded property on Kapiolani Street, across from the County of Hawaii Civil Defense building in the town of Hilo, Hawaii. The property did not appear to be currently in use. The entrance to the property was through Hualalai Street and through a dirt road that ran through a small residential area located in the southern portion of the subject Site. The Site was heavily wooded and vegetated with no roads or public access. The Site was accessed through the dirt road starting at Hualalai Street on the southern portion of the Site and ending at Kukuau Street on the northern portion of the Site. No indications of current or historical chemical use or storage were observed, and no indications of current or historical petroleum or hazardous material use, or storage were noted. There were no indicators of stressed vegetation, discolored, or disturbed soil areas. No discolored or polluted water was observed, including unusual or noxious odors. ERA did no observe any groundwater monitoring wells or floor drains on the Site. Aerial photographs from 1954 through 2013, indicate that the Site has remained undeveloped throughout its recorded history. No RECs were identified in the review of the historic aerial photographs. ES-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: ES February 2019 Page: 2 of 4 Electrical transformers may contain PCBs and all untested mineral oil transformers purchased prior to July 1, 1979, must be considered PCB-contaminated. RECs were not identified during the assessment of electrical transformers. ERA observed three poles each with a single electrical transformer mounted. HELCO was queried regarding if the PCB status of these transformers were known. HELCO responded that all three (3) observed pole mounted transformers were non-PCB containing. The Hawaiian Electric Company response is provided in Appendix F. No fluorescent light fixtures were observed throughout the subject property. ERA queried the EDR database to obtain information about federal and state environmental release listings. The Site was not listed on any federal or state environmental database. No sites in the vicinity of the subject Site were identified which would pose and environmental threat to the subject Site. ES-2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: ES February 2019 Page: 3 of 4 Notes: “-“ = no ASTM RECs identified, no further investigation is required R = ASTM defined REC observed H = ASTM defined Historic REC observed E = indicates de minimus or non ASTM REC Reference numbers (i.e., R1) are further discussed in the Executive Summary. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECs - Site x No RECs Identified Table ES-1 Phase I ESA Summary Assessment Component TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080 Historic Land Use (Section 2) Historical Aerial Photos/Maps - Land Lease/Ownership - Interviews - Regulatory Records Review - Site Reconnaissance (Section 4) Operations - Hazardous Materials Storage - Underground Storage Tanks - Aboveground Storage Tanks - Solid Waste - Wells - Asbestos - Lead Based Paint - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) - Regulatory Database Review (Section 5) Target Property - Surrounding Sites - ES-3 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: ES February 2019 Page: 4 of 4 Additional Environmental Issues x No Additional Environmental Issues Identified ES-4 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 1 February 2019 Page: 1 of 6 SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report was prepared by Environmental Risk Analysis LLC (ERA) on behalf of A0705 Hilo, L.P. The subject of this Phase I ESA is an undeveloped 5.05-acre property subdivided into three (3) separate parcels designated by Tax Map Keys (TMKs) (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080. The subject Site is located in the town of Hilo, on the east coast of the island of Hawaii. 1.1 PURPOSE This Phase I ESA was requested by A0705 Hilo, L.P., to determine the current environmental status of the Site to satisfy due diligence requirements mandated by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The purpose of this investigation was to identify and evaluate evidence that may indicate any Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) at the Site due to past or current management of chemicals or other materials that, if released or not properly controlled, could present a risk to human health or the environment. Under CERCLA, owners and operators of real estate with hazardous substance contamination may be held strictly liable for the costs of cleaning up contamination found on their property. No evidence linking the owner/operator with the placement of the hazardous substances on the property is required. Congress, in response to pressure from business and academic groups, established the “innocent landowner defense” in the 1986 amendments to CERCLA known as the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA). To establish innocent landowner status, the landowner “must have undertaken, at the time of acquisition, all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial and customary practice in an effort to minimize liability.” In an effort to clarify what constitutes “all appropriate inquiry,” the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) has developed a standard that provides specific definition of the steps one should take when conducting a “due diligence” Phase I ESA for commercial real estate. The site assessment documented herein complies with the current ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments. 1-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 1 February 2019 Page: 2 of 6 ASTM E-1527-13 defines three categories of Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC) which may impact the project site. x A REC is defined as the presence of any hazardous substance or petroleum product in, on, or at the property: 1) due to any release to the environment, 2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment, or 3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment x Historical RECs (H-RECs) are defined as a past release of any hazardous substance or petroleum product that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authorities or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls x Controlled RECs (C-RECs) are defined as a REC resulting from a past release that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place, subject to the implementation of required controls, such as property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls Additionally, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) has also published its final rule setting federal standards for the conduct of all appropriate inquiries. This rule establishes specific regulatory requirements for conducting all appropriate inquiries into previous ownership, uses, and environmental conditions of a property. As of November 1, 2006, parties must comply with either the requirements of the All Appropriate Inquiries Final Rule or the standards set forth in the ASTM E1527-13 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. All appropriate inquiries must be conducted in compliance with either of these standards in order to obtain protection from potential liability under CERCLA as an innocent landowner, a contiguous property owner, or a bona fide prospective purchaser. This site assessment complies with both the current ASTM E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments and the USEPA All Appropriate Inquiries Rule. 1.2 SCOPE The scope of services for this Phase I ESA consisted of the following tasks: x Reviewing historical aerial photographs, information of past ownership, and conducting discussions with knowledgeable persons to evaluate historical land use. x Assessing general conditions at the Site including a general geology and hydrogeology evaluation. 1-2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 1 February 2019 Page: 3 of 6 x A reconnaissance visit to the Site to evaluate visual evidence of past or current practices that may have impacted the Site. x Reviewing local, state, and federal agency lists and available files of reported hazardous waste sites and hazardous substance/petroleum sources and releases. ERA queried the Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) database which provides comprehensive federal and state environmental release listings. The EDR database provides results in proximity to the Site following ASTM search distance guidelines. x Providing a summary of findings and recommendations for the Site. x Providing a summary of the limitations of this assessment. 1.3 SITE LOCATION The Site is approximately 219,978 square feet (5.05-acres) and is defined as TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080 in the city of Hilo, Hawaii. A map displaying the location of the Site is included as Figure 1. Figure 2 depicts the TMK boundaries. 1.4 CURRENT USE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY The Site is completely unpaved and heavily wooded with no traversing roads or public access. 1.5 CURRENT USE OF ADJACENT PROPERTIES Adjoining properties were observed from public access areas for signs of RECs for their potential to pose an environmental risk to the subject property. The uses and features of adjoining properties are provided below: 1-3 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 1 February 2019 Page: 4 of 6 North: Kukuau Street, Airbrush Exotic Tans tanning salon, and other residential structures. South: Hale Nani Street, Luscious Lash beauty salon, Quality Detailing car detailing service, and other residential structures. East: Kapiolani Street, Hilo Driving Licensing Station, and County of Hawaii Civil Defense. West: Kilika Lane, and other residential structures. 1-4 PROJECT NAME:FIGURE TITLE:FIGURE NUMBER:1Phase I Environmental Site AssessmentKaiaulu O Kapiolani Hilo, HawaiiTMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, and(3) 2-4-025:080Site Location MapSite BoundaryÜ^_Site Location FIGURE NUMBER:2Phase I Environmental Site AssessmentKaiaulu O Kapiolani Hilo, HawaiiTMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, and(3) 2-4-025:080TMK MapKUKUAU STK IN O O L E S T INIA LNU L U LA N I S T K A P IO L A N I S T HUALALAI STHOKU STWAILOA STPONAHAWAI STMOHOULI STP O P O L O S T IPUKA STPA NAE WA STMAUNA LOA S T HEMA STHALE NANI STHE I L NKILAUEA AVEM A U NA KE A S T A K A H I S TBARENABA LNHOLOMALIA STK U MU K O A S TLANIKUKIA PLA H E A HE S TDERBY LNIL IM A L NDESKY LN HILINAI STAKIALOHA LNIL IM A L NWailoa RWailoa RKUKUAU STK IN O O L E S T INIA LNU L U L A N I S T K A PI O L A N I S T HUALALAI STHOKU STWAILOA STPONAHAWAI STMOHOULI STP O P O LO S T PA N A E WA S T IPUKA STMAU N A L O A S T H A L E N A N I S T H O L O M A L IA S T PROJECT NAME:FIGURE TITLE:01,0002,0003,0004,000500FeetÜLegendTMK BoundaryTMK (3) 2-4-025:048TMK (3) 2-4-025:053TMK (3) 2-4-025:080 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 1 of 9 SECTION 2: HISTORICAL LAND USE Research regarding historical land use was conducted to determine, to the extent practicable, if past or current practices involving the use, storage, treatment, generation, and/or disposal of hazardous substances or petroleum products may have taken place at the Site or if releases on properties in the surrounding area may have impacted the Site. Research on historical land use was accomplished by examining the following sources: historical information sources, historical aerial photographs, land lease and land ownership records, and reports from previous investigations that may have been conducted at the Site. In addition, first hand interviews were conducted with persons who are knowledgeable about the Site. 2.1 HISTORICAL INFORMATION SOURCES ERA queried the EDR database to obtain information about federal and state environmental release listings. The EDR database provides results in proximity to the Site following ASTM search distance guidelines (indicated in Section 5) and is continually updated. EDR provided the Sanborn Fire Insurance maps, historical city records, and historical topographic maps reviewed in this Section. Results of the EDR database search are provided in Section 5 of this report. Other historical information sources queried included: aerial photographs and environmental records reviewed through the State of Hawai‘i, Department of Health (HDOH). 2.2 HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Historical aerial photographs were reviewed to help determine the past use of the Site, as well as adjacent properties. Aerial photographs for the years 1954, 1975, 1977, 1985, 1992, and 2000 were obtained from EDR historical aerial maps (EDR, 2019a). A 2013 aerial photograph from Google Maps is included. Based on a review of the historical aerial photographs spanning 1954 to 2013, the Site remains undeveloped. No ASTM defined RECs were noted from review of the historical aerial photographs. Copies of the aerial photographs are available in Appendix B. Brief descriptions of these photographs are presented below: 2-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 2 of 9 1954 Site: The 1954 aerial photograph depicts the Site being undeveloped land, with no roads or structures visible on the property. Adjacent Properties: Adjacent properties directly to the west of the site are undeveloped. The adjacent properties to the south and east are partially developed with visible structures. The adjacent properties to the north of the site are developed with residential structures. 1975 Site: The 1975 aerial photograph depicts the Site being undeveloped and heavily wooded land, with no roads or structures visible on the property. Adjacent Properties: Adjacent properties directly to the west of the site are undeveloped. The adjacent properties to the south are fully developed with residential structures. The properties to the east are partially developed with visible commercial structures. The adjacent properties to the north of the site are developed with residential structures. 1977 Site: The 1977 aerial photograph depicts the Site being undeveloped and heavily wooded land, with no roads or structures visible on the property. Adjacent Properties: Similar to the 1975 aerial photograph, adjacent properties directly to the west of the site are undeveloped. The adjacent properties to the south are fully developed with residential structures. The properties to the east are partially developed with visible commercial structures. The adjacent properties to the north of the site are developed with residential structures. 1985 Site: The 1985 aerial photograph depicts the Site being undeveloped and heavily wooded land, with no roads or structures visible on the property. Adjacent Properties: The adjacent properties directly to the west of the site partially developed with residential structures. The adjacent properties to the south are fully developed with residential 2-2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 3 of 9 structures. The properties to the east are developed with commercial structures. The adjacent properties to the north of the site are developed with residential structures. 1992 Site: The 1992 aerial photograph depicts the Site being undeveloped and heavily wooded land, with no roads or structures visible on the property. Adjacent Properties: Similar to the 1985 aerial photograph, adjacent properties directly to the west of the site partially developed with residential structures. The adjacent properties to the south are fully developed with residential structures. The properties to the east are developed with commercial structures. The adjacent properties to the north of the site are developed with residential structures. 2000 Site: The 2000 aerial photograph depicts the Site being undeveloped and heavily wooded land, with no roads or structures visible on the property. The photograph depicts the Site as arid land, but it is believed to be the result of a red tint. Adjacent Properties: Similar to the 1992 aerial photograph, adjacent properties directly to the west of the site partially developed with residential structures. The adjacent properties to the south are fully developed with residential structures. The properties to the east are developed with commercial structures. The adjacent properties to the north of the site are developed with residential structures. 2013 Site: The Site in the 2013 aerial from Google Maps appears as it exists today. Adjacent Properties: Adjacent properties in the vicinity of the property are as they exists today. 2.3 EDR SUPPLEMENTAL SEARCH OF SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS The EDR database was queried for Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, which document historical property use. Results indicate that the property is unmapped, and Sanborn Maps were unable to be found in the database search (EDR, 2019b). 2-3 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 4 of 9 2.4 EDR CITY DIRECTORY ABSTRACT EDR City Directory Abstracts identify historic usage of subject and adjoining properties. The City Directory Abstract is presented in Appendix C. Listings were found for the years 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2014 (EDR, 2019c). The 2014 City Directory does not list any business at the Site. Businesses listed on Kukuahu Street are Hamasaki Chalmers MD, Inc. on 251 Kukuahu Street and Elite Contracting LLC on 312 Kukuahu Street. The 2010 City Directory does not list any business at the Site. Businesses listed on Kukuahu Street are Hamasaki Chalmers MD, Inc. on 251 Kukuahu Street, Sugar Shane Enterprises LLC on 287 Kukuahu Street, and Elite Contracting LLC on 312 Kukuahu Street. The 2005 City Directory does not list any business at the Site. Businesses listed on Kukuahu Street are Hamasaki Chalmers MD, Inc. on 251 Kukuahu Street, Alans Art & Collectibles on 474 Kukuahu Street The 2000 City Directory does not list any business at the Site. The only busines listed on Kukuahu Street is Hamasaki Chalmers MD, Inc. on 251 Kukuahu Street. The 1995 City Directory does not list any business at or in the vicinity of the subject Site. The 1992 City Directory does not list any business at or in the vicinity of the subject Site. The 1987 City Directory does not list any business at the Site. Businesses listed in the vicinity of the subject Site were Hatada Bakery, Inc on 55 Kukuahu Street, Lee Construction, Inc., on 352 Kukuau Street, and Qualified Painting Service on 430 Kukuahu Street. The 1982 City Directory does not list any business at the Site. Businesses listed in the vicinity of the subject Site were Hatada Bakery, Inc on 55 Kukuahu Street, Fantasia Pacific, Inc. on 138 Kukuau Street, Iyo Dry Goods on 228 Kukuau Street, Limited Home improvement Control on 278 Kukuahu Street, Lee Construction, Inc., on 352 Kukuau Street, Qualified Painting Service on 430 Kukuahu Street, and Miyamura Takeyuki Contractor on 596 Kukuahu Street. Based on a review of the City Directory, the listed businesses were not identified as a potential environmental concern. 2-4 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 5 of 9 2.5 EDR HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS EDR Historical Topographic Maps track changing land use and development patterns of subject and adjoining properties. Historical Topographic Maps are presented in Appendix C (EDR, 2019d). Following are the observations made of listings provided for the years 1914, 1917, 1932 1963, 1980, 1981, 1995, and 2013 (most current year available). No ASTM defined RECs were noted from the review of the historic topographic maps. 1914 (7.5 Minute): Two structures of unknown nature were displayed on the Site. Alenaio Stream lies to the west of the Site and Waiakea Mill lies to the east. 1917 (7.5 Minute): Two structures of unknown nature were displayed on the Site. Alenaio Stream lies to the west of the Site and Waiakea Mill lies to the east. The topography is similar to the 1914 map. 1932 (7.5 Minute): Two structures of unknown nature were displayed on the Site. Alenaio Stream lies to the west of the Site and Waiakea Mill lies to the east. The Hilo town center appears fully developed. The topography is similar to the 1917 map. 1963, 1980 (7.5 Min.): The topography of the Site appears similar to the 1932 map. St. Joseph’s High School and Kapiolani School appear in close vicinity to the Site. The Army Reserve Center and University of Hawaii at Hilo are located within a mile southeast of the Site. A Powerhouse Gaging Station is displayed a mile northwest of the Site. From 1980, the structures on the Site are no longer displayed. 1981, 1995 (7.5 Minute): The topography of the Site appears similar to the 1980 map. 2013 (7.5 Minute): The Site remains undeveloped. Similar to the 1995 topographic map, no structures are displayed on the Site. The topography remains unchanged from previous topographic maps. 2-5 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 6 of 9 2.6 TIER ONE VAPOR ENCROACHMENT SCREENING Based on the EDR Vapor Encroachment screen there was one (1) incident of a LUST which may have been used to store gasoline from 1999. Halai Hill Radio Station located at the end of Ulili Street off Hina Street. A cleanup was conducted, and the subject site received a No Further Action (NFA) status. The subject site is thirty (30) feet upgradient about ¼-mile from the Site. Due to the nature of contamination at this site and the distance from the subject Site, the site is unlikely to pose a significant environmental threat to the subject Site. 2.7 LAND LEASES AND OWNERSHIP The County of Hawaii lists the Fee Owner of the Site as Giampaolo Boschetti. This information is also listed on the County of Hawaii’s Real Property Assessment and Tax Billing Information website. According to the County of Hawaii records. Past ownership of the Site was queried from the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) Bureau of Conveyances records. The DLNR, Bureau of Conveyance record for the years 1951 to 1987 was found (Appendix D). Past ownership records of the parcel with designated Tax Map Key TMK (3) 2-4-025:048 list the parcel being 362,493 square feet in 1951 and having the ownership of Akana A. Richardson (Kinoole Development Company, Ltd. In 1963 the was an amendment of trust to George, Richard, Julius Richardson, Thomas Guard and grandchildren. The termination of trust for George, Richard, Julius Richardson, Thomas Guard and grandchildren ended a year later. In 1964, there is a deed listed from Cooke Tr. Co Ltd to George, Richard, Julius Richardson, and Thomas Guard. In 1967, a deed is listed from Robert Richardson, et al to County of Hawaii. In 1969, there is a deed listed from the First National Bank of Hawaii to Fay I Linger, Robert and Julius Richardson, and Thomas Guard. In 1969, there is a deed listed from Robert Richardson, et al to Kinoole Dev Co, Ltd. In 1976, there is a deed listed from Robert Richardson to First Hawaiian Bank. In the year 1977, a transaction is listed from Suzanne Richardson to First Hawaiian Bank. In 1978, a deed is listed from Thomas Guard to Hawaiian Trust Company. In 1980, a deed is listed from John S Tolmie to JT Trading Company Ltd (20%), Auto Imports of Hawaii (20%), Farms & Ranches Inc (20%), Sea Gifts Corporation (20%), Siegfred S Kagawa (6%), Kason Inc (5%), Gek Corp (3%), Henlin Corp (3%), Katco Inc (3%). In 1980, a deed is listed from Sea Gifts Corp to Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc (40%). In 1981, the parcel was subdivided down to 279,983 square feet. 2-6 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 7 of 9 Past ownership records of the parcel with designated Tax Map Key TMK (3) 2-4-025:053 list the parcel being 26,197 square feet. A transaction is also listed to Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc (40%), Farms & Ranches Inc (20%), JT Trading Company Ltd (20%), Siegfred S Kagawa (6%), Kason Inc (5%), Gek Corp (3%), Henlin Corp (3%), Katco Inc (3%). In 1981, a deed is listed (Doc#: 1092388) to Hiroshi Kitsutani. In 1983 and 1985, two deeds are listed (Doc #s: 1189805 & 1328034) to Hiroshi Kitsutani and wife and to Kitsutani Family trust, respectively. 2.8 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ERA queried Mr. Allen T Yap, Paynella Hawaii LLC, representative of the current owners concerning previous environmental investigations conducted at the Site. According to Mr. Yap, it is unknown if any previous investigation have been conducted at the Site. No record of any previous site assessment was found in the historical database review or HDOH records. 2.9 INTERVIEWS ERA conducted interviews with persons who are knowledgeable about the Site. The objective of these interviews was to ascertain any information that may be indicative of potential RECs in connection with the Site. According to ASTM Standard E1527-13 Section 3.2.43, questions should be addressed to past and present owners, operators, and occupants of the Site, as well as local government officials. Summary of Interviews The following individuals were contacted to complete this Phase I ESA. A summary of each interview (including business and contact name) is presented below. Interview documentation is provided in Appendix E. x Allen T Yap, Paynella Hawaii LLC, representative of the current property owners, via questionnaire dated February 12, 2019 x Mr. Richard Takaba, DOH SHWS Office, via email on February 12 and 13, 2019. 2-7 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 8 of 9 Allen T Yap, Paynella Hawaii LLC, representative of the current owners Mr. Allen T Yap, representative of the current owners of the target property, completed a Phase I ESA questionnaire dated February 12, 2019. Mr. Yap stated having no knowledge of any environmental liens filed against the property, nor was he aware of any activity use limitations for the property, such as engineering controls, land use restrictions or institutional controls. Mr. Yap responded no to paying fair market value, however, no contamination is known or believed to be present at the property. Mr. Yap was not familiar with the past uses of the property and were not aware of any environmental spills or releases that took place within the subject property or the neighboring parcels. Mr. Richard Takaba, HDOH Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch (SHWB) Mr. Richard Takaba of the HDOH Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch was queried about the Honokaa Federal Credit Union site as a release was reported in September 2017 and is listed on the HDOH LUST database. Honokaa Federal Credit Union, reported a release on 09/18/2017, and is noted as a Confirmed Release on the HDOH LUST database. Mr. Takaba provided file records and noted an unknown small UST was discovered and subsequently removed from the property. Consultants for the property owner noted the site was a former gas station in the 1920’s and 1930’s, and the UST appeared to date back to that period of time. Sampling was performed in September 2017 and analytes found in the Site soil were below applicable HDOH Unrestricted EALs. HDOH concluded no further investigation was warranted and requested a UST Closure report be prepared. HDOH is currently awaiting the closure report. The Honokaa Federal Credit Union is not considered a REC. 2.10 RECORDS REVIEW HDOH Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch LUST Records Honokaa Federal Credit Union site as a release was reported in September 2017 and is listed on the HDOH LUST database. Honokaa Federal Credit Union, reported a release on 09/18/2017, and is noted as a Confirmed Release on the HDOH LUST database. As stated above, Mr. Takaba provided file records and noted an unknown small UST was discovered and subsequently removed from the property. Consultants for the property owner noted the site was a former gas station in the 1920’s and 1930’s, and the UST appeared to date back to that period of time. Sampling was 2-8 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 2 February 2019 Page: 9 of 9 performed in September 2017 and analytes found in the Site soil were below applicable HDOH Unrestricted EALs. HDOH concluded no further investigation was warranted and requested a UST Closure report be prepared. HDOH is currently awaiting the closure report. The Honokaa Federal Credit Union is not considered a REC. 2.11 ENVIRONMENTAL LIENS OR ACTIVITY AND USE LIMITATIONS An interview with the representative of the current owner of the property indicated there were no environmental liens or activity use limitations associated with the property. 2.12 VALUATION REDUCTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES Information regarding valuation of the subject Site was not provided. The County of Hawaii Real Property Assessment website lists the total market value and the total assessed value as $753,500. Real Property Assessment and Tax Billing Information lists the property class of TMK (3) 2-4- 025:048 and (3) 2-4-025:080 as Residential, and TMK (3) 2-4-025-053 as Apartment (County of Hawaii, 2019). 2-9 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 3 February 2019 Page: 1 of 3 SECTION 3: SITE CONDITIONS The subject property is situated in Hilo on the Island of Hawaii. The following section describes the Site with regards to soil classifications, groundwater hydrology, topography and land cover and local zoning. 3.1 SOIL CLASSIFICATIONS The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) classifies the type of soil within the Site as 100% Keaukaha-Urban land complex. It is classified as a Hydrologic Soil Group D with a typical profile consisting of highly decomposed plant material from 0 to 4 inches bgs and lithic bedrock from 4 to 14 inches bgs. These soils have a high runoff class, which indicates they are well drained. The depth to groundwater is more than 80 inches. 3.2 GROUNDWATER HYDROLOGY The Site overlies the Hilo aquifer system of the Northeast Mauna Loa aquifer sector. The aquifer is a basal (fresh water in contact with sea water), unconfined (where water table is upper surface of saturated aquifer), flank aquifer. It is classified as currently used, drinking, irreplaceable, and highly vulnerable to contamination, that is fresh (<250 milligrams per liter [mg/l] chloride [Cl-]) (Mink and Lau, 1992). According to a 1-mile radius search from the Site, the EDR report listed two (2) United States Geological Survey (USGS) wells within a 1-mile radius of the Site (EDR, 2019e). The nearest Federal Public Water Supply (PWS) well is located within ¼-mile radius from the Site. The subject property of the well is located Mauka (i.e., toward the mountains) of the Underground Injection Control Line (UIC) therefore it is considered a potable water resource. The subject property of the other well is located Makai (i.e., toward the ocean) of the UIC therefore, not considered a potable water resource. Injection wells do require a UIC permit or permit exemption and permit limitations are imposed. 3.3 TOPOGRAPHY AND LAND COVER The Site is undeveloped and heavily wooded. According to the USGS, Honolulu, Hawaii, 7.5- minute topographic map, the subject property is located at -155.087087 - 155° 5’ 14” longitude and 19.71405 - 19° 42’ 51” latitude, approximately 91 feet above mean sea level (EDR, 2019e). 3-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 3 February 2019 Page: 2 of 3 3.4 LOCAL ZONING The County of Hawaii, Planning Division, indicates that the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance designation for the Site is RM-1 – Multiple-Family Residential District with a required land area of 1,000 square feet for each dwelling unit, or for each separate rentable unit). 3.5 FLOOD ZONE DETERMINATION According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) #1551660736F, the subject property is located in Zone X, designated as an area outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain and the flood potential for the subject property is minimal. The property is not within a tsunami or dam evacuation zone. 3-2 FIGURE NUMBER:3Phase I Environmental Site AssessmentKaiaulu O Kapiolani Hilo, HawaiiTMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, and(3) 2-4-025:080Underground Injection Control MapK IN O O LE S T KILAUEA AVEKUKUAU STMANONO STMOHOULI STHAILI STKAMEHAMEHA AVEK A P IO LA N I S T U L U L A N I S T KALANIKOA STK O M O HA NA S T WAIANUENUE AVEPONAHAWAI STKANOELEHUA AVEMILILANI STHINANO STBAYFRONT HWYLAUKAPU STLEILANI STKEKUANAOA STPIILANI STINIA LNHUALANI STK U M U K O A S TE LANIKAULA STALAE STKAIULANI STRAILROAD AVEHUALALAI STNOE STKUAWA STK E A W E S T PARK RDPUNAHELE STPAUAHI STP O P O L O S T E KAWILI STIOLANI STHEMA STHALAI STHOKU STWAILUKU DRHILINAI STO H U K E A S TWAILOA STIPUKA STW LANIKAULA STAALA LNAUPUNI STKAHIKINI STKOHOLA STLANIHULI STILOKO STBANYAN DRKALILI STHOOPUNI STLA HOU STKAHEMA STM A N E LE LNDERBY LNH E I L NMALANAI STS PR ING STPUNAHOA STMAILE STK A A N IN I S T A M AKI H I S TKUMU STH O O M ANA STBISHOP STHUALI PLN O IO L N E LE P A IO S T A W IK I P LNAHELE WAYUHU STL O U L U L N KUKUAU STKANOELEHUA AVEPROJECT NAME:FIGURE TITLE:BELOW UIC LINE- Underlying aquifer not considered drinking water source- Wider variety of wells allowed- Injection wells need UIC Permit or Permit Exemption- Permit limitations are imposedABOVE UIC LINE- Underlying aquifer considered a drinking water source- Limited types of injection wells allowed- Injection wells need UIC Permit or Permit Exemption- Permit limitations are imposed and requirements are more stringentLEGENDSite Boundary010.5MilesÜ Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 4 February 2019 Page: 1 of 3 SECTION 4: SITE RECONNAISSANCE The purpose of the site reconnaissance is to visually assess for evidence of the use, storage, generation and disposal of potentially hazardous substances and petroleum products, and/or indicators of possible releases of hazardous substances and/or petroleum products at the Site. Evidence of possible releases of hazardous substances or petroleum products include discolored soil, flooring, or paving; visible leaks; odors; and apparent stressed vegetation. A visual survey of adjacent properties from public thoroughfares is also conducted. Mr. Max Ulloa of ERA conducted the site reconnaissance on February 10, 2019. The following sections present general observations of the Site and the surrounding area. 4.1 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE SITE No visual evidence of hazardous substance release was noted during the site reconnaissance. Photos of the Site as it appeared on February 10, 2019 are provided in Appendix F. General The Site was located at an open, undeveloped, and heavily wooded property on Kapiolani Street, across from the County of Hawaii Civil Defense building in the town of Hilo, Hawaii. The property did not appear to be currently in use. The entrance to the property was through Hualalai Street and through a dirt road that ran through a small residential area located in the southern portion of the subject Site. The Site was heavily wooded and vegetated with no roads or public access. The Site was accessed through the dirt road starting at Hualalai Street on the southern portion of the Site and ending at Kukuau Street on the northern portion of the Site. No indications of current or historical chemical use or storage were observed, and no indications of current or historical petroleum or hazardous material use, or storage were noted. There were no indicators of stressed vegetation, discolored, or disturbed soil areas. No discolored or polluted water was observed, including unusual or noxious odors. ERA did not observe any groundwater monitoring wells or floor drains on the Site. 4-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 4 February 2019 Page: 2 of 3 4.2 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE SURROUNDING AREA ERA visually assessed areas adjacent to the Site from public thoroughfares. The following were observed for the surrounding area: x North: Residential structures, Kukuau Street. More residential structures beyond Kukuau street. x East: Kapiolani Street. Across Kapiolani Street is The County of Hawaii Civil Defense building, Hilo Driver Licensing Station, and the Hawaii Police Department. St. Joseph’s School is also located to the southeast of the Site. x South: Residential structures. Hualalai Street, and Hale Nani Street. x West: Residential structures and Popolo Street. The adjacent properties that were observed during inspection of the subject property mainly include residential properties, along with tanning salons, schools and government buildings. All adjacent properties that were inspected appeared to be well maintained and no indications of any potential for RECs were observed. No evidence of hazardous substance release was observed from any of the adjacent properties or other public thoroughfares. 4.3 PCB-CONTAINING EQUIPMENT RECs were not identified during the assessment of electrical transformers. Electrical transformers may contain PCBs and all untested mineral oil transformers purchased prior to July 1, 1979, must be considered PCB-contaminated. ERA observed three (3) poles, each with a single electrical transformer located near the Site. Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO) was queried regarding if the PCB status of these transformers were known. HELCO responded that all three (3) observed pole mounted transformers were non-PCB containing. The HELCO response is provided in Appendix F. No fluorescent light fixtures were observed throughout the subject property. 4.4 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL AND LEAD PAINT ACBM and LCP are not considered to be RECs as defined by ASTM but can pose potential health hazards. There was no observed potential ACBM and LCP at the Site. If additional materials are discovered during Site development, these materials may require testing prior to disposal. 4-2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 4 February 2019 Page: 3 of 3 4.5 ARSENIC From the review of historic site use, the Site was not historically used for sugar cane cultivation; therefore, arsenic is not considered a REC for the Site. 4-3 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 1 of 12 SECTION 5: REVIEW OF FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LISTS AND AVAILABLE FILES OF REPORTED HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE/PETROLEUM PRODUCT SOURCES AND RELEASES This section includes results of a review of federal, state, and local lists and available files of reported hazardous waste sites and hazardous substance/petroleum product sources and releases. The EDR database provided the federal and state environmental release listings (EDR, 2019e). This information is provided in Appendix C and is summarized below. 5.1 DATABASES AND REGULATORY FILES REVIEWED A list of the Federal Sources and Hawai‘i State Regional databases reviewed is provided below. These databases were reviewed to document the location of federal and state listed sites, or other known hazardous waste sites, following ASTM search distance guidelines. The ASTM search distance guidelines are provided in parenthesis. There were findings in the following databases reviewed: Standard Environmental Record Sources x Federal CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (CERC-NFRAP) (½-mile) (now known as Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive [SEMS-ARCHIVE]) x Federal RCRA – small quantity generators (RCRA-SQG) (¼-mile) x Federal RCRA – conditionally exempt small quantity generators (RCRA-CESQG) (property and adjoining properties) (¼-mile) x State Hazardous Waste Sites List (SHWS) (1-mile) x HDOH LUST Database (½-mile) x HDOH Registered UST Database (property and adjoining properties) (¼-mile) x State Sites with Institutional Controls (INST CONTROL) (property only) (½-mile) x Voluntary Remediation Program and Brownfields Sites with Institutional Controls (½- mile) The following standard environmental record sources were reviewed by EDR, however there were no findings within the ASTM specified search distances. The following databases are provided for reference, but not further discussed in this report: 5-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 2 of 12 x Federal National Priorities List (NPL) (1-mile) x Federal Delisted NPL List (½-mile) x Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) (½-mile) x Federal Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS) (1-mile) x Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) non-CORRACTS – treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (RCRA-TSDF) (½-mile) x Federal RCRA – large quantity generators (RCRA-LQG) (property and adjoining properties) x Federal Engineering Controls Sites (property only) x Federal Sites with Institutional Controls (property only) x Federal Emergency Response Notification System (property only) x Permitted Landfills in the State of Hawai‘i (½-mile) x State Voluntary Response Program Sites (½-mile) x State Brownfields Sites (½-mile) Additional Environmental Record Sources x RCRA Non-Generator List x Integrated Compliance Information System State List of Permitted Facilities Permitted Drycleaner Facility Listing x EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants (MGP) The following additional environmental records sources were reviewed by EDR, however there were no findings within the ASTM specified search distances. The following databases are provided for reference, but not further discussed in this report: x State facilities permitted as solid waste landfills, incinerators, or transfer stations (½-mile) x Department of Defense Sites (DOD) x Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) x EPA Listing of Brownfields Properties x Leaking Underground Storage on Indian Land (½-mile) x Underground Storage on Indian Land (½-mile) x Mines Master Index File 5-2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 3 of 12 x Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report (FINDS) x Biennial Reporting System x Superfund CERCLA Consent Decrees x CERCLA Lien Information x Records of Decision x Uranium Mill Tailing Sites x Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System x Material Licensing Tracking System x PCB Activity Database System x Storm Water General Permits x RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System x Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System x Toxic Substances Control Act x Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act /Toxic Substances Control Act x Section 7 Tracking Systems x Open Dump Inventory x Clandestine Drug Labs x Incident and Accident Data x Radiation Information Database x Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act/ Toxic Substances Control Act Tracking System Administrative Case Listing x Land Use Control Information System x Indian Reservations x Historical Auto Stations (¼-mile) x Underground Injection Wells Listing (UIC) (½-mile) x Financial Assurance Listing (½-mile) 5-3 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 4 of 12 5.2 RESULTS OF DATABASE REVIEW AND REGULATORY AGENCY CONTACTS This section provides a summary of results for all database searches conducted during this assessment. ERA does not consider any of the EDR results discussed below as RECs for the Site. Section 5.2.1 provides results specifically for the Site and Section 5.2.2 provides results found for properties within the vicinity of the Site. 5.2.1 RESULTS FOR SUBJECT SITE The target property address submitted to EDR was not listed in any reviewed databases searched by EDR. 5.2.2 RESULTS FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT SITE ASTM proximity search guidelines were used to designate properties for evaluation and review. Potential environmental conditions at adjacent properties located within the vicinity of the Site are summarized below. Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal CERCLIS NFRAP Site List (SEMS-ARCHIVE) Based on the EDR’s database search (dated 12/13/2018), there is one (1) SEMS-ARCHIVE site within a ½- mile radius of the subject Site. SEMS-ARCHIVE tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. Details are listed below: x Hilo Arsenic Spill Site is located at 33B Liliuokalani Lane. This property is not on the NPL list and does not qualify for NPL status. ERA opines that it is unlikely to pose a significant environmental threat to the subject Site. 5-4 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 5 of 12 RCRA-SQG Database Based on the EDR’s registered RCRA small quantity generator (SQG) database search (dated 03/01/2018), there is one (1) registered RCRA-SQG site within a ¼-mile radius of the Site. Details are listed below: x Hamakua Sugar Co Inc with an address of 1 Sugar Lane, did not have any violations noted in the record. ERA opines that it is unlikely to pose a significant environmental threat to the subject Site. Federal RCRA CESQG Generators List Based on the EDR’s registered RCRA-CESQG database search (dated 03/01/2018), there is one (1) registered RCRA-SQG site within a ¼-mile radius of the Site. Details are listed below: x Hilo Quality Cleaners with an address of 865 Kinoole Street, did not have any violations noted in the record. ERA opines that it is unlikely to pose a significant environmental threat to the subject Site. Solid and Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS) Database According to the SHWS records (dated 09/27/2018), there are 19 SHWS facilities located within a 1-mile radius of the Site. The sites are discussed below: x Eight (8) sites received a NFA-Unrestricted Use. o SC Minor Kunieda is located at 470 W Lanikaula St, approximately 0.8 miles from the Site, and is relatively higher in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates TPH-diesel and arsenic were found at the site. This property was issued an NFA letter, unrestricted residential use. Therefore, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Hilo Macaroni Factory is located at 639 Kinoole St, approximately 0.2 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates TPH-diesel was found at the site. This property was issued an NFA letter, unrestricted residential use. Therefore, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. 5-5 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 6 of 12 o Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey House located at 1055 Kinoole St, approximately 0.3 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates there was a TPH-diesel release at the site. This property was issued an NFA letter, unrestricted residential use. Therefore, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Larry’s Chevron is located at 835 Kilauea Ave, approximately 0.5 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates petroleum contaminated soil was found at the site. This property was issued an NFA letter, unrestricted residential use. Therefore, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Downtown Chevron Is located at 192 Kinoole St, approximately 0.6 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates petroleum and hydraulic fluid were found in the soil at the site. This property was issued an NFA letter, unrestricted residential use. Therefore, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Keawe 76 Service Station is located at 210 Keawe St, approximately 0.6 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates TPH-oil was found at the site beneath hydraulic hoists. This property was issued an NFA letter, unrestricted residential use. Therefore, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Hilo Shopping Center is located at 1255bKilauea Ave, approximately 0.7 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates TPH-diesel was found at the site. This property was issued an NFA letter, unrestricted residential use. Therefore, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Exempt UST Closure is located at 458 Kekuanoa St, approximately 1 mile from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates TPH-diesel was found at the site. This property was issued an NFA letter, unrestricted residential use. Therefore, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. 5-6 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 7 of 12 x Two (2) sites received a Historic NFA-Incomplete Documentation. o Hilo Quality Cleaner located at 865 Kinoole St. – Hazard Undetermined. This property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Roberts Bakery, Boiler UST Removal located at 374 Kinoole St. – Hazard Undetermined. This property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. x One (1) sites received a Historic NFA-Restricted Use. o Hilo Arsenic, with an address of 33B Liliuokalani Ln. – Hazard Managed with Controls. Arsenic in the soil (found in the first 12-18 inches) is covered with concrete. This property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. x Two (2) sites received a NFA-Restricted Use. o Western Auto Hydraulic Oil, with an address of 141 Haili St. – Hazard Managed with Controls. A petroleum release was reported for the property. The hazard is managed with controls. This property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o KHI Inc. DBA Bayside with an address of 774 Kamehameha Ave. – Hazard Managed with Controls. TPH-gasoline, TPH-diesel, TPH-oil, and xylene was present in subsurface soil. The hazard is managed with controls. This property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. x Four (4) sites are listed as Assessment Ongoing – Controls Required to Manage Contamination. o Lanakila Homes Phase 3B-4, located at 600 Wailoa St., is approximately 0.2 miles from the Site, and is relatively higher in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates metals and pesticides were found in the soil. The hazard is managed with controls. Due to the nature of contamination documented in the database, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Hilo Quality Washerette, located at 210 Hoku St., is approximately 0.3 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database 5-7 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 8 of 12 indicates TPH-diesel was found in the soil at the site. The hazard is managed with controls. Due to the nature of contamination documented in the database, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Old Hilo Canec Plant, located at Kekuanaoa St. and Mililani St., is approximately 1 mile from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates arsenic was found in the soil at the site. The hazard is managed with controls. Due to the nature of contamination documented in the database, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. o Waiakea Upland, located at the corner of Kekuanaoa St. and Mililani St., is approximately 1 mile from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates arsenic was found in the soil. The hazard is managed with controls. Due to the nature of contamination documented in the database, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. x One (1) site is listed as Assessment Ongoing – Hazard Undetermined. o UST Excavated Bishop and Kamehameha, located at Bishop St. and Kamehameha Ave., is approximately 0.8 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation to the subject Site. The SHWS database indicates a UST was excavated and the assessment is ongoing. The site is considered a low hazard priority. Due to the lower elevation of this site and low hazard priority, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. x One (1) site is listed as Response Ongoing – Hazard Managed with Controls. o Hatada Bakery (Former) is located at 555 Kukuau St, is approximately 0.3 miles from the Site, and is relatively lower in elevation. The SHWS database notes possible TPH-diesel, acenaphthene, fluoranthene, naphthalene, and possible benzo(a)pyrene in soil and possibly groundwater. The site will be further characterized in the future when the property is redeveloped. The hazard is managed with controls. Due to the lower elevation and distance to the subject Site, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. 5-8 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 9 of 12 HDOH Leaking UST (LUST) Database A search of the HDOH LUST Branch database records (dated 08/31/2018) resulted in 11 sites having reported a UST release within a ½-mile radius of the Site. According to the HDOH LUST database, of the eleven (11) LUST sites, nine (9) sites are recorded as Site Cleanup Completed and were issued an NFA. The remaining sites are discussed below. x JC Penney Co., Inc. reported two (2) releases. One release is noted as Site Cleanup Completed with a NFA. The other release is noted as Site Cleanup Completed with EHE. JC Penney Co., Inc. is located approximately a ½-mile away, downgradient of the subject property. JC Penney Co., Inc. does not pose a significant environmental threat to the subject Site. x Honokaa Federal Credit Union, reported a release on 09/18/2017, and is noted as a Confirmed Release on the HDOH LUST database. Records reviewed from HDOH and discussion with Mr. Richard Takaba of the HDOH Solid and Hazardous Waste Branch indicates an unknown small UST was removed from the property. Sampling was performed in September 2017 and analytes found in the Site soil were below applicable HDOH Unrestricted EALs. The Site was a former gas station in the 1920’s and 1930’s, and the UST appeared to date back to that period of time. HDOH concluded no further investigation was warranted and a UST Closure report be prepared. HDOH is currently awaiting the closure report. Honokaa Federal Credit Union does not pose a significant environmental threat to the subject Site. The facilities listed on the HDOH LUST database do not pose a significant environmental threat to the subject Site. HDOH Registered UST Database A search of the HDOH UST Branch database records (dated 08/31/2018) resulted in seven (7) reported registered UST sites within a ¼-mile radius of the Site. Four (4) of the sites report their tanks as Permanently Out of Use. The remaining sites are described below: x Halai Hill Radio Station site located at the end of Ulili St contains a currently in use 600- gallon UST and permanently out of use gasoline UST. 5-9 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 10 of 12 x The Hawaii County Police Department lists two (2) in use 8000-gallon gasohol tanks and two (2) permanently out of use 5000-gallon gasoline USTs. x Honokaa Federal Credit Union lists a single UST in service. No further information was provided regarding size or contents of the UST. The facilities listed on the HDOH UST database are located down-gradient at varying distances from the Site and does not pose a significant environmental threat to the subject Site. ENG CONTROLS Database Based on the EDR’s ENG CONTROLS list (dated 09/27/2018), there is one (1) registered site within a ½-mile radius of the Site. Details are listed below: x Hilo Arsenic located at 33B Liliuokalani Ln, is noted as Engineering Control Required. This site is listed in the SHWS database as having found arsenic in soil. Contaminated soil is bound by concrete slab on the site. Activities which may disturb the integrity of the capping system are prohibited. HDOH issued an NFA with restricted use. ERA opines that this property is unlikely to pose significant environmental threat to the subject Site. INST CONTROL Database Based on the EDR’s INST CONTROL list (dated 09/27/2018), there are three (3) sites within a ½- mile radius of the Site. Details are listed below: x Hilo Quality Washerette, located at 210 Hoku St., is noted as Hazard Managed with Controls. This property is listed in the SHWS database with found diesel in soil and hazards managed with controls. This property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. x Hatada Bakery (Former) is located at 555 Kukuau St, is noted as Hazard Managed with Controls. This site is listed in the SHWS databased with found TPH-diesel, acenaphthene, fluoranthene, naphthalene, and possible benzo(a)pyrene in soil and possibly groundwater. The site will be further characterized in the future when the property is redeveloped. The hazard is managed with controls. Due to the lower elevation and distance to the subject Site, this property is unlikely to have any impact on the subject Site. 5-10 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 11 of 12 x Hilo Arsenic located at 33B Liliuokalani Ln, is noted as Hazard Managed with Controls. Arsenic contaminated soil is bound by concrete slab on the site. Activities which may disturb the integrity of the capping system are prohibited. HDOH issued an NFA with restricted use. ERA opines that this property is unlikely to pose significant environmental threat to the subject Site. RCRA NonGen / No Longer Regulated (NLR) Database Based on the EDR’s registered RCRA NonGen / NLR database search (dated 03/01/2018), there is one (1) registered RCRA NonGen / NLR sites within a ¼-mile radius of the Site. Details are listed below: x Mr. K’s Recycle and located at 815 Kinoole St, was subject to a Compliance Evaluation Inspection On-Site in June 2014 and received a Written Informal violation on 05/08/2014 with compliance achieved on 06/18/2014. The nature of the violation was not reported. No other violations were noted. ERA opines that this property is unlikely to pose significant environmental threat to the subject Site. DRYCLEANERS Based on the EDR’s Drycleaners list (dated 12/31/2018), there is one (1) site within a ¼-mile radius of the Site. Details are listed below: x Hilo Quality Cleaner located at 865 Kinoole St. This site is located approximately ¼-mile downgradient of the subject Site. ERA opines that this property is unlikely to pose significant environmental threat to the subject Site. MGP List Based on the EDR’s MGP list, there is one (1) site within a 1-mile radius of the Site. Details are listed below: x Hilo Gas Company Ltd located at 51-53 Ponahawai St., is approximately 0.5 miles away at a relatively lower elevation. No additional information was available. ERA opines that this property is unlikely to pose significant environmental threat to the subject Site. 5-11 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 5 February 2019 Page: 12 of 12 Unmapped Sites due to Poor or Inadequate Address Information There were nine (9) unmapped sites listed in EDR as having poor or inadequate address information in relation to the subject property. A summary of the listings is as follows: x One (1) site (Hilo Bay Front Soccer Field) is listed on the SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) database. The SEMS-ARCHIVE tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. x One (1) site (Kilauea Volcano Air Monitoring) is listed on the SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) database. The site is greater than ½-mile away and is listed as Removal Only – No Site Assessment Needed. x Five (5) sites are listed on the SHWS. Of these: o One (1) site (Mauna Kea Sugar – Hilo Sugar Pesticide) is greater than 1 mile away. o One (1) site (Hawaii County Kamehameha Avenue) is noted of interest. No other information is provided. o One (1) site (Waiakea Mill Company – Camp 1) received a NFA – Site Discovery Clearance. o One (1) site (HELCO Pole-Mounted Transformer) received a NFA – Unrestricted Use. o One (1) site (Wailoa River State Recreation Area) is listed as Assessment Ongoing for arsenic in soil Controls to Manage Contamination is noted. x One (1) site (Hilo Judiciary Center Project) is listed on the SHWS, Eng Controls, and Inst Control databases. The site received a NFA – Restricted Use. x The last site (Arsenic Mililani Street in Hilo) is listed on the SHWS, SPILLS, and Inst Control databases. The site received a NFA – Restricted Use. These unmapped sites are not in close proximity to the subject Site and were determined not to pose a significant environmental threat. 5-12 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 6 February 2019 Page: 1 of 2 SECTION 6: FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS At the request of A0705 Hilo, L.P., ERA performed a Phase I ESA for three parcels of land identified as TMK (3) 2-4-025:043, 053, and 080 in Hilo, Hawaii. The purpose of this ESA was to identify, to the extent feasible, RECs associated with the Site. The investigation included a physical inspection of the property; review of current regulatory environmental database information; interviews of persons knowledgeable about the property, review of historical records; and preparation of this Phase I ESA Report. This ESA report conforms to the format outlined in the ASTM Document E1527-13 and the USEPA All Appropriate Inquiries Rule. The site reconnaissance visit was conducted by Mr. Max Ulloa on February 10, 2019. Findings The Site was located at an open, undeveloped, and heavily wooded property on Kapiolani Street, across from the County of Hawaii Civil Defense building in the town of Hilo, Hawaii. The property did not appear to be currently in use. The entrance to the property was through Hualalai Street and through a dirt road that ran through a small residential area located in the southern portion of the subject Site. The Site was heavily wooded and vegetated with no roads or public access. The Site was accessed through the dirt road starting at Hualalai Street on the southern portion of the Site and ending at Kukuau Street on the northern portion of the Site. No indications of current or historical chemical use or storage were observed, and no indications of current or historical petroleum or hazardous material use, or storage were noted. There were no indicators of stressed vegetation, discolored, or disturbed soil areas. No discolored or polluted water was observed, including unusual or noxious odors. ERA did no observe any groundwater monitoring wells or floor drains on the Site. Aerial photographs from 1954 through 2013, indicate that the Site has remained undeveloped throughout its recorded history. No RECs were identified in the review of the historic aerial photographs. Electrical transformers may contain PCBs and all untested mineral oil transformers purchased prior to July 1, 1979, must be considered PCB-contaminated. RECs were not identified during the assessment of electrical transformers. ERA observed three poles each with a single electrical transformer mounted. HELCO was queried regarding if the PCB status of these transformers were 6-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 6 February 2019 Page: 2 of 2 known. HELCO responded that all three (3) observed pole mounted transformers were non-PCB containing. The Hawaiian Electric Company response is provided in Appendix F. No fluorescent light fixtures were observed throughout the subject property. ERA queried the EDR database to obtain information about federal and state environmental release listings. The Site was not listed on any federal or state environmental database. No sites in the vicinity of the subject Site were identified which would pose and environmental threat to the subject Site. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECs - Site x No RECs Identified List of Additional Environmental Issues x No Additional Environmental Issues Identified. 6-2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 7 February 2019 Page: 1 of 1 SECTION 7: DEVIATIONS AND DATA GAPS The following are data gaps encountered during the assessment: x A valuation assessment comparing fair market value of the property was not performed as information regarding the fair market value and property purchase price was not available. These data gaps are not considered significant. 7-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 8 February 2019 Page: 1 of 2 SECTION 8: REPORT LIMITATIONS The findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations of this report are limited by the technical requirements specified in the contract between A0705 Hilo, L.P. and ERA. The findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations presented herein solely identify and evaluate evidence that may indicate that environmental hazards exist at the Site due to past or current management of chemicals or other materials that, if released or not properly controlled, could present a risk to human health or the environment. The Phase I ESA provides a “snap shot” of Site conditions at the time of the investigation. The assessment does not cover site changes that ERA could not reasonable ascertain. Additionally, it must be noted that no investigation can completely rule out the existence of any regulated or hazardous materials at a given Site. In preparing this report, ERA relied on information derived from visual reconnaissance, governmental agencies, computer databases, and personal interviews. Except as set forth in this report, ERA made no independent investigations as to the accuracy and completeness of the information derived from the listed sources. ERA assumed that all information obtained during the course of the investigation is accurate and complete. Although ERA did evaluate (to the extent reasonable) the historical use of adjacent properties (e.g., City Directory Search), ERA cannot guarantee that neighboring industries have not impacted the subject Site. ERA did not perform a complete environmental assessment of adjacent properties and it is possible that groundwater migration, overland flow or transport of contaminated particles via wind may have contaminated the Site. All findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations stated in this report are based on facts; circumstances; applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, and regulations; and generally accepted national standards for such services in existence at the time that the report was prepared. Topics not explicitly discussed within this report should not be assumed to have been investigated or tested. ERA has prepared this document for the use and benefit of A0705 Hilo, L.P. Any use of this document or information herein by persons or entities other than those named above without the 8-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 8 February 2019 Page: 2 of 2 express written consent of ERA will be at the sole risk and liability of said person or entity, and ERA will not be liable to such persons or entities for any damages resulting therefrom. 8-2 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 9 February 2019 Page: 1 of 2 SECTION 9: REFERENCES American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2013, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, E1527-13. County of Hawaii GIS Website, Parcel & Zoning Map. Accessed February 2019. http://qpublic9.qpublic.net/hi_hawaii_search.php County of Hawaii Real Property Tax Office, 2019. Accessed February 2019. http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/ Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), 2019a. Aerial Photo Decade Package, A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani, Hilo, HI 96720, Inquiry Number 5517150.8, February 5, 2019. EDR, 2019b. Certified Sanborn® Map Report, A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani, Hilo, HI 96720, Inquiry Number 5517150.3, February 5, 2019. EDR, 2019c. City Directory Image Report, A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani, Hilo, HI 96720, Inquiry Number 5517150.5, February 5, 2019. EDR, 2019d. Historical Topographic Map Report, A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani, Hilo, HI 96720, Inquiry Number 5517150.4, February 5, 2019. EDR, 2019e. Radius Map with GeoCheck®, A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani, Hilo, HI 96720, Inquiry Number 5517150.2s, February 5, 2019. EPA, Underground Storage Tank (UST) Sites. 2017, Retrieved February 2019. https://www.epa.gov/ust/contaminants-concern-coc-underground-storage-tank-ust-sitesn Google Maps, 2019. Aerial photograph, image date 1/21/2013. Accessed February 2019. https://www.google.com/maps Google My Maps, Island of Hawaii: Underground Injection Control Areas. Accessed February 2019. 9-1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Section: 9 February 2019 Page: 2 of 2 Mink, J. F. and S. L. Lau, 1992, Aquifer Identification and Classification for the Island of Hawaii Groundwater Protection Strategy for Hawai‘i. Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa, Technical Report No. 186. State of Hawaii, Department of Land and Natural Resources: Flood Hazard Assessment Tool. Accessed February 2019. http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT/. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resources Conservation Service. Accessed February 2019. www.websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov. 9-2 Appendix B AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS PROJECT NAME:FIGURE TITLE:FIGURE NUMBER:Appendix BPhase I Environmental Site AssessmentKaiaulu O Kapiolani Hilo, HawaiiTMK (3) 2-4-025:048, (3) 2-4-025:053, and(3) 2-4-025:0802013 Aerial PhotographÜ 5554368.8 2000 = 500' 5554368.8 1992 = 500' 5554368.8 1985 = 500' 5554368.8 1977 = 500' 5554368.8 1975 = 500' 5554368.8 1954 = 500' Appendix C EDR REPORT, SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS, HISTORICAL TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS, HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND CITY DIRECTORY FORM-LBC-DCA ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 5554368.2s February 05, 2019 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 65 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-8 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-10 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC5554368.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist fromother sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2018 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments for Forestland or Rural Property (E 2247-16), the ASTM Standard Practice for Limited Environmental Due Diligence: Transaction Screen Process (E 1528-14) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS NOT REPORTED HILO, HI 96720 COORDINATES 19.7140500 - 19˚ 42’ 50.58’’Latitude (North): 155.0870870 - 155˚ 5’ 13.51’’Longitude (West): Zone 5Universal Tranverse Mercator: 281247.3UTM X (Meters): 2181053.0UTM Y (Meters): 91 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5949390 HILO, HITarget Property Map: 2013Version Date: 5554368.2s Page 2 H38 WAIAKEA UPLAND ARSEN CORNER OF MILILANI A SHWS Lower 5163, 0.978, East H37 OLD HILO CANEC PLANT KEKUANAOA ST AND MIL SHWS Lower 5163, 0.978, East H36 EXEMPT UST CLOSURE A 458 KEKUANAOA ST SHWS, SPILLS Lower 5072, 0.961, East 35 UST EXCAVATED BISHOP BISHOP ST AND KAMEHA SHWS Lower 4058, 0.769, NE 34 SFC MINORU KUNIEDA U 470 W LANIKAULA ST SHWS Higher 4011, 0.760, SSE 33 KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE 774 KAMEHAMEHA AVE SHWS, LUST, UST, INST CONTROL, SPILLS, Financial... Lower 3611, 0.684, NE 32 HILO SHOPPING CENTER 1255 KILAUEA AVE SHWS, SPILLS Lower 3533, 0.669, ESE G31 KEAWE 76 SERVICE STA 210 KEAWE ST SHWS, SPILLS Lower 3243, 0.614, North G30 DOWNTOWN CHEVRON 192 KINOOLE ST SHWS, LUST, UST, SPILLS, Financial Assurance Lower 3121, 0.591, North G29 WESTERN AUTO HYDRAUL 141 HAILI ST SHWS, LUST, INST CONTROL, SPILLS Lower 3025, 0.573, North 28 LARRY’S CHEVRON 835 KILAUEA AVE SHWS, LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Lower 2773, 0.525, ENE 27 HILO GAS COMPANY LTD 51-53 PONAHAWAI ST EDR MGP Lower 2707, 0.513, NNE 26 STANLEY I. HARA EAST OF KILAUEA AVE LUST, UST Lower 2569, 0.487, North 25 J C PENNEY CO., INC. 777 KILAUEA AVE LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Lower 2511, 0.476, ENE 24 ALENAIO STREAM FLOOD ALENAIO STREAM FLOOD LUST, UST Lower 2397, 0.454, NNE F23 I. YAMADA FURNITURE 340 KINOOLE ST LUST, UST Lower 2367, 0.448, North F22 ROBERTS BAKERY, BOIL 374 KINOOLE ST SHWS, SPILLS Lower 2235, 0.423, North 21 THE MODERN CLEANERS 266 KILAUEA AVE LUST, UST Lower 2181, 0.413, NNE 20 GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBB 475 KILAUEA AVE LUST, UST Lower 2158, 0.409, NE D19 WONG’S 76 UNION L-38 376 KILAUEA AVE LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Lower 2058, 0.390, NNE E18 HILO ARSENIC 33B LILIUOKALANI LN SHWS, ENG CONTROLS, INST CONTROL, SPILLS Lower 2016, 0.382, NNE E17 HILO ARSENIC SPILL S 33B LILIUOKALANI LAN SEMS-ARCHIVE Lower 2016, 0.382, NNE E16 HAWAII COUNTY CENTRA 466 KINOOLE ST LUST, UST Lower 1833, 0.347, North D15 HATADA BAKERY (FORME 55 KUKUAU ST SHWS, INST CONTROL, SPILLS Lower 1815, 0.344, NNE 14 SUN SUN LAU CHOP SUE 1055 KINOOLE ST SHWS, SPILLS Lower 1776, 0.336, East B13 HILO QUALITY WASHERE 210 HOKU ST SHWS, INST CONTROL, SPILLS Lower 1346, 0.255, ENE C12 HAMAKUA SUGAR CO INC 1 SUGAR LANE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO Higher 1308, 0.248, South C11 HALAI HILL RADIO STA END OF ULILI ST, OFF LUST, UST, Financial Assurance Higher 1308, 0.248, South 10 HILO MACARONI FACTOR 639 KINOOLE ST SHWS, SPILLS Lower 1270, 0.241, NNE B9 CLOSED SHELL SERVICE 895 KINOOLE ST UST Lower 1179, 0.223, ENE B8 HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST LUST, UST Lower 1151, 0.218, ENE B7 HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST RCRA-CESQG, SHWS, SPILLS, FINDS, ECHO, AIRS,... Lower 1151, 0.218, ENE A6 HAWAII PETROLEUM DIS 815 KINOOLE ST UST Lower 1086, 0.206, NE A5 MR. K’S RECYCLE AND 815 KINOOLE ST RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 1086, 0.206, NE A4 RALPH’S 76 INC. 770 KINOOLE ST UST, Financial Assurance Lower 953, 0.180, NE 3 LANAKILA HOMES PHASE 600 WAILOA ST SHWS Higher 880, 0.167, SSE 2 HONOKAA FEDERAL CRED 379 ULULANI LUST, UST Lower 822, 0.156, NNE 1 HAWAII COUNTY POLICE 349 KAPIOLANI ST UST, Financial Assurance, UIC Lower 47, 0.009, NNE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: NOT REPORTED HILO, HI 96720 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Permitted Landfills in the State of Hawaii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing VCP Voluntary Response Program Sites State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Brownfields Sites ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations ODI Open Dump Inventory IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register CDL Clandestine Drug Lab Listing US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System SPILLS Release Notifications SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing AIRS List of Permitted Facilities Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing LEAD LEAD UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. A review of the SEMS-ARCHIVE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/13/2018 has revealed that there is 1 SEMS-ARCHIVE site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HILO ARSENIC SPILL S 33B LILIUOKALANI LAN NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.382 mi.) E17 33 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-SQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HAMAKUA SUGAR CO INC 1 SUGAR LANE S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) C12 25 EPA ID:: HID103901328 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 RCRA-CESQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-CESQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA-CESQG site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) B7 15 EPA ID:: HID982436487 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: The State Hazardous Waste Sites records are the states’ equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. The data come from the Department of Health. A review of the SHWS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/27/2018 has revealed that there are 19 SHWS sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LANAKILA HOMES PHASE 600 WAILOA ST SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) 3 10 SFC MINORU KUNIEDA U 470 W LANIKAULA ST SSE 1/2 - 1 (0.760 mi.) 34 59 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) B7 15 HILO MACARONI FACTOR 639 KINOOLE ST NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.241 mi.) 10 22 HILO QUALITY WASHERE 210 HOKU ST ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.255 mi.) B13 27 SUN SUN LAU CHOP SUE 1055 KINOOLE ST E 1/4 - 1/2 (0.336 mi.) 14 29 HATADA BAKERY (FORME 55 KUKUAU ST NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.344 mi.) D15 30 HILO ARSENIC 33B LILIUOKALANI LN NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.382 mi.) E18 34 ROBERTS BAKERY, BOIL 374 KINOOLE ST N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.423 mi.) F22 39 LARRY’S CHEVRON 835 KILAUEA AVE ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.525 mi.) 28 44 WESTERN AUTO HYDRAUL 141 HAILI ST N 1/2 - 1 (0.573 mi.) G29 46 DOWNTOWN CHEVRON 192 KINOOLE ST N 1/2 - 1 (0.591 mi.) G30 48 KEAWE 76 SERVICE STA 210 KEAWE ST N 1/2 - 1 (0.614 mi.) G31 51 HILO SHOPPING CENTER 1255 KILAUEA AVE ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.669 mi.) 32 53 KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE 774 KAMEHAMEHA AVE NE 1/2 - 1 (0.684 mi.) 33 54 UST EXCAVATED BISHOP BISHOP ST AND KAMEHA NE 1/2 - 1 (0.769 mi.) 35 60 EXEMPT UST CLOSURE A 458 KEKUANAOA ST E 1/2 - 1 (0.961 mi.) H36 61 OLD HILO CANEC PLANT KEKUANAOA ST AND MIL E 1/2 - 1 (0.978 mi.) H37 62 WAIAKEA UPLAND ARSEN CORNER OF MILILANI A E 1/2 - 1 (0.978 mi.) H38 63 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the Department of Health’s Active Leaking Underground Storage Tank Log Listing. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/31/2018 has revealed that there are 11 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HALAI HILL RADIO STA END OF ULILI ST, OFF S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) C11 24 Release ID: 990152 Facility Id: 9-600561 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HONOKAA FEDERAL CRED 379 ULULANI NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.156 mi.) 2 10 Release ID: 180007 Facility Id: 9-603968 Facility Status: Confirmed Release HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) B8 20 Release ID: 900075 Facility Id: 9-601694 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) HAWAII COUNTY CENTRA 466 KINOOLE ST N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.347 mi.) E16 32 Release ID: 950010 Facility Id: 9-601085 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) WONG’S 76 UNION L-38 376 KILAUEA AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.390 mi.) D19 36 Release ID: 020021 Facility Id: 9-600010 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBB 475 KILAUEA AVE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.409 mi.) 20 37 Release ID: 930089 Facility Id: 9-601615 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) THE MODERN CLEANERS 266 KILAUEA AVE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.413 mi.) 21 38 Release ID: 010026 Facility Id: 9-603658 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) I. YAMADA FURNITURE 340 KINOOLE ST N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.448 mi.) F23 40 Release ID: 920067 Facility Id: 9-601371 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) ALENAIO STREAM FLOOD ALENAIO STREAM FLOOD NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.454 mi.) 24 41 Release ID: 990206 Facility Id: 9-603532 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) J C PENNEY CO., INC. 777 KILAUEA AVE ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.476 mi.) 25 41 Release ID: 900118 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 Release ID: 050022 Facility Id: 9-600456 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed with EHE STANLEY I. HARA EAST OF KILAUEA AVE N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.487 mi.) 26 43 Release ID: 990085 Facility Id: 9-603459 Facility Status: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the Department of Health’s Listing of Underground Storage Tanks. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/31/2018 has revealed that there are 7 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HALAI HILL RADIO STA END OF ULILI ST, OFF S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.248 mi.) C11 24 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Tank Status: Currently in Use Facility Id: 9-600561 Date Closed: 10/26/1998 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HAWAII COUNTY POLICE 349 KAPIOLANI ST NNE 0 - 1/8 (0.009 mi.) 1 8 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Tank Status: Currently In Use Facility Id: 9-600458 Date Closed: 12/01/1993 HONOKAA FEDERAL CRED 379 ULULANI NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.156 mi.) 2 10 Tank Status: Currently in Use Facility Id: 9-603968 RALPH’S 76 INC. 770 KINOOLE ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.180 mi.) A4 11 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Facility Id: 9-601641 Date Closed: 03/20/1998 HAWAII PETROLEUM DIS 815 KINOOLE ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.206 mi.) A6 14 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Facility Id: 9-601622 HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) B8 20 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Facility Id: 9-601694 Date Closed: 10/30/1990 CLOSED SHELL SERVICE 895 KINOOLE ST ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.223 mi.) B9 21 Tank Status: Permanently Out of Use Facility Id: 9-600775 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS: A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. A review of the ENG CONTROLS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/27/2018 has revealed that there is 1 ENG CONTROLS site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HILO ARSENIC 33B LILIUOKALANI LN NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.382 mi.) E18 34 Voluntary Remediation Program and Brownfields sites with institutional controls in place. A review of the INST CONTROL list, as provided by EDR, and dated 09/27/2018 has revealed that there are 3 INST CONTROL sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HILO QUALITY WASHERE 210 HOKU ST ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.255 mi.) B13 27 HATADA BAKERY (FORME 55 KUKUAU ST NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.344 mi.) D15 30 HILO ARSENIC 33B LILIUOKALANI LN NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.382 mi.) E18 34 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/01/2018 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ MR. K’S RECYCLE AND 815 KINOOLE ST NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.206 mi.) A5 12 EPA ID:: HIR000140368 DRYCLEANERS: A listing of permitted drycleaner facilities in the state. A review of the DRYCLEANERS list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/31/2018 has revealed that there is 1 DRYCLEANERS site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HILO QUALITY CLEANER 865 KINOOLE ST ENE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.218 mi.) B7 15 Pernit Number: 0521-01-N EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. A review of the EDR MGP list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR MGP site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ HILO GAS COMPANY LTD 51-53 PONAHAWAI ST NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.513 mi.) 27 44 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5554368.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 9 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ HILO JUDICIARY CENTER PROJECT SHWS, ENG CONTROLS, INST CONTROL MAUNA KEA SUGAR - HILO SUGAR PESTI SHWS HAWAII COUNTY KAMEHAMEHA AVENUE IM SHWS WAIAKEA MILL COMPANY - CAMP 1 SHWS ARSENIC MILILANI STREET IN HILO SHWS, INST CONTROL, SPILLS WAILOA RIVER STATE RECREATION AREA SHWS HELCO POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER NO. SHWS KILAUEA VOLCANO AIR MONITORING SEMS HILO BAY FRONT SOCCER FIELD SEMS-ARCHIVE EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.2001 0 0 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001NPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ERNS State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 19 NR 11 5 3 0 1.000SHWS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 11 NR NR 8 3 0 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST TC5554368.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 7 NR NR NR 6 1 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500ENG CONTROLS 3 NR NR 3 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US HIST CDL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001CDL 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US CDL Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LIENS 2 Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001EPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TSCA TC5554368.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001TRIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001SSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RMP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RAATS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PRP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PADS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ICIS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001MLTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001COAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001PCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001HIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001US AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001DOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001ECHO 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001AIRS 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001Financial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001LEAD 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001UIC EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA HWS 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.001RGA LUST 47 0 12 18 16 1 0- Totals -- TC5554368.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5554368.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 12/31/2012Expiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 1Tank Id: 9-600458Alt Facility ID: 12/31/2012Expiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-BTank Id: 9-600458Alt Facility ID: HI Financial Assurance: GasolineSubstance: 5000Tank Capacity: 12/01/1993Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/22/1975Date Installed: R-BTank ID: GasolineSubstance: 5000Tank Capacity: 12/01/1993Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/22/1975Date Installed: R-ATank ID: GasoholSubstance: 8000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently In UseTank Status: 01/01/1994Date Installed: 2Tank ID: GasoholSubstance: 8000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently In UseTank Status: 01/01/1994Date Installed: 1Tank ID: GPSHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.085210Longitude: 19.715660Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 349 Kapiolani St.Owner Address: HAWAII COUNTY POLICE DEPTOwner: 9-600458Facility ID: UST: 47 ft. 0.009 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 85 ft. < 1/8 UICHILO, HI 96720 NNE Financial Assurance349 KAPIOLANI ST N/A 1 USTHAWAII COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT U001236879 TC5554368.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 11/1/1989Approval-To-Construct Issuance Date: Not reportedPublic Notice Date: 11/15/1988Receipt Of Initial Application: County of Hawaii - DPWConsultant Serving The Application: noneOwner Of Land Property On Leasehold: 3:2-4-25:028Tax Map Key Number: 25 Aupuni St., Hilo, HI 96720Owner Address: County of HawaiiFacility Owner: 25 Aupuni St., Hilo, HI 96720Operator Address: County of Hawaii - DPWFacility Operator, Not Contract Opr: CSubclass: DWFacility Type: Not reportedLocation In Relation To UIC Line: HawaiiIsland: 1Total Number Of Inj. Well(S) On Permit: Not reportedFlow In Gallons Per Day: 155 05 16Central Longitude Of The Site: 19 43 08Central Latitude Of The Site: 8-4305.07AFacility Id/Lat Long Minute Coordinates: UH-1545UIC Permit Number: UIC: 12/31/2014Expiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-ATank Id: 9-600458Alt Facility ID: 12/31/2014Expiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 2Tank Id: 9-600458Alt Facility ID: 12/31/2014Expiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 1Tank Id: 9-600458Alt Facility ID: 12/31/2014Expiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-BTank Id: 9-600458Alt Facility ID: 12/31/2012Expiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 2Tank Id: 9-600458Alt Facility ID: 12/31/2012Expiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-ATank Id: 9-600458Alt Facility ID: HAWAII COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT (Continued) U001236879 TC5554368.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRemarks: CHUIC Project Geologist: Not reportedDate When File Is Closed: 10/30/1994Permit Expiration Date: Not reportedType: Not reportedLast Issuance Of Permit: 10/30/19891st Issuance Of Permit: Not reportedExemption Issuance Date: HAWAII COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT (Continued) U001236879 Not reportedSubstance: Not reportedTank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently in UseTank Status: 01/01/1920Date Installed: 1Tank ID: Not reportedHorizontal Collection Method Name: Not reportedHorizontal Reference Datum Name: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 379 Ululani StOwner Address: HFS Federal Credit UnionOwner: 9-603968Facility ID: UST: Richard TakabaProject Officer: 180007Release ID: 09/18/2017Facility Status Date: Confirmed ReleaseFacility Status: 9-603968Facility ID: LUST: 822 ft. 0.156 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 65 ft. 1/8-1/4 HILO, HI 96720 NNE UST379 ULULANI N/A 2 LUSTHONOKAA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION U004276857 MediumHazard Priority: John PeardProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Lanakila Homes Phase 3B-4Environmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 880 ft. 0.167 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 107 ft. 1/8-1/4 HILO, HI 96720 SSE 600 WAILOA ST N/A 3 SHWSLANAKILA HOMES PHASE 3B-4 S117391475 TC5554368.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HI 96720 (808) 933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,Contact Information: John PeardProject Manager: Not reportedDocument Subject: Not reportedDocument Number: Not reportedDocument Date: Not reportedSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: Controls Required to Manage ContaminationUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Found: Metals and pesticides in soil.Nature of Contamination: Not reportedResponse: Assessment OngoingAssessment: MediumPriority: Hazard PresentPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Lanakila Homes Phase 3B-4SDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard PresentPotential Hazards And Controls: LANAKILA HOMES PHASE 3B-4 (Continued) S117391475 R-4Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 3000Tank Capacity: 03/20/1998Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/05/1966Date Installed: R-3Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 3000Tank Capacity: 03/20/1998Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/05/1966Date Installed: R-2Tank ID: Not reportedHorizontal Collection Method Name: Not reportedHorizontal Reference Datum Name: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 770 KINOOLE STOwner Address: RALPH’S 76 INC.Owner: 9-601641Facility ID: UST: 953 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster A 0.180 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 65 ft. 1/8-1/4 HILO, HI 96720 NE Financial Assurance770 KINOOLE ST N/A A4 USTRALPH’S 76 INC.U001237089 TC5554368.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedExpiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-2Tank Id: 9-601641Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: r-1Tank Id: 9-601641Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601641Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-3Tank Id: 9-601641Alt Facility ID: HI Financial Assurance: GasolineSubstance: 5000Tank Capacity: 03/20/1998Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/05/1966Date Installed: r-1Tank ID: Used OilSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: 03/20/1998Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/05/1966Date Installed: RALPH’S 76 INC. (Continued)U001237089 MRKSRECYCLE@HAWAII.RR.COMContact email: 808-895-4471Contact telephone: USContact country: HILO, HI 96720 815 KINOOLE STContact address: ROY H KADOTAContact: HIR000140368EPA ID: HILO, HI 96720 815 KINOOLE STFacility address: MR. K’S RECYCLE AND REDEMPTION CENTER, INC.Facility name: 07/07/2015Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 1086 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster A 0.206 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 61 ft. 1/8-1/4 HILO, HI 96720 NE 815 KINOOLE ST HIR000140368 A5 RCRA NonGen / NLRMR. K’S RECYCLE AND REDEMPTION CENTER, INC. 1014472039 TC5554368.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Historical Generators: Not reportedGenerated waste on-site: YesAccumulated waste on-site: EWaste type: Universal Waste Summary: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: YesTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/04/2011Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 808-895-4471Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: HILO, HI 96720 815 KINOOLE STOwner/operator address: ROY H. KADOTAOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 05/04/2011Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 808-895-4471Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: HILO, HI 96720 815 KINOOLE STOwner/operator address: ROY H. KADOTAOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: MR. K’S RECYCLE AND REDEMPTION CENTER, INC. (Continued) 1014472039 TC5554368.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: 06/18/2014Date achieved compliance: Universal Waste - Small Quantity HandlersArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/21/2014Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 05/08/2014 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 06/18/2014Date achieved compliance: 05/08/2014Date violation determined: Universal Waste - Small Quantity HandlersArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Not a generator, verifiedClassification: MR. K’S RECYCLE AND REDEMPTION CENTER, INC.Site name: 05/04/2011Date form received by agency: MR. K’S RECYCLE AND REDEMPTION CENTER, INC. (Continued) 1014472039 GasolineSubstance: 4000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/07/1965Date Installed: R-02Tank ID: Used OilSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/07/1965Date Installed: R-01Tank ID: Not reportedHorizontal Collection Method Name: Not reportedHorizontal Reference Datum Name: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 800 SW FIRST AVE., SUITE 180Owner Address: TEXACO REFINING & MARKETING INC.Owner: 9-601622Facility ID: UST: 1086 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster A 0.206 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 61 ft. 1/8-1/4 HILO, HI 96720 NE 815 KINOOLE ST N/A A6 USTHAWAII PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTION U001237072 TC5554368.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GasolineSubstance: 4000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/07/1965Date Installed: R-04Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 4000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/07/1965Date Installed: R-03Tank ID: HAWAII PETROLEUM DISTRIBUTION (Continued) U001237072 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: HILO QUALITY CLEANERSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste; or 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates at any from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting land or water, of acutely hazardous waste; or generates 100 kg or less other debris resulting from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any waste; or 100 kg or less of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or month, and accumulates at any time: 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous or generates 1 kg or less of acutely hazardous waste per calendar month, and accumulates 1000 kg or less of hazardous waste at any time; Handler: generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste per calendarDescription: Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 808-935-1620Contact telephone: USContact country: HILO, HI 96720 865 KINOOLE STContact address: RONALD JOHNSONContact: HILO, HI 96720 KINOOLE STMailing address: HID982436487EPA ID: HILO, HI 96720 865 KINOOLE STFacility address: HILO QUALITY CLEANERSFacility name: 10/26/1990Date form received by agency: RCRA-CESQG: DRYCLEANERS AIRS 1151 ft.ECHOSite 1 of 4 in cluster B 0.218 mi.FINDS Relative: Lower Actual: 60 ft. 1/8-1/4 SPILLSHILO, HI 96720 ENE SHWS865 KINOOLE ST HID982436487 B7 RCRA-CESQGHILO QUALITY CLEANERS 1004688848 TC5554368.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Hilo Quality CleanersSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard UndeterminedPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Ross KugeProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110005726526Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hilo Quality CleanersEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) 1004688848 TC5554368.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Terry CorpusActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: diesel #6 bunkerSubstances: Hilo Quality Cleaners oil impacted soilsUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005726526Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19940111Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hilo Quality CleanersFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Terry CorpusActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: diesel #6 bunkerSubstances: Hilo Quality Cleaners oil impacted soilsUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005726526Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19940111Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Ross KugeProject Manager: Cleaners, Facility at 865 Kinoole St, Hilo HI Hazardous Waste Release Response Determination for Hilo QualityDocument Subject: 1997-250-RKDocument Number: 07/17/1997Document Date: Historic NFA - Incomplete DocumentationSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: UndeterminedUse Restrictions: UnknownNature of Residual Contamination: Presumed: UnknownNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: Hazard UndeterminedPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110005726526Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) 1004688848 TC5554368.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 30Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Hilo Quality Cleaners Diesel SpillUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005726526Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19971018-1909Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.082942Longitude: 19.715910999999998Latitude: Hilo Quality CleanersFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Terry CorpusActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel #6 BunkerSubstances: Hilo Quality Cleaners tank removalUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005726526Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19950111Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hilo Quality CleanersFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Terry CorpusActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel #6 BunkerSubstances: Hilo Quality Cleaners tank removalUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005726526Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19950111Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.082942Longitude: 19.715910999999998Latitude: Hilo Quality CleanersFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) 1004688848 TC5554368.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 865 Kinoole StreetMailing Address: HawaiiIsland: 0521-01-NFacility Identifier: AIRS: http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110005726526DFR URL: 110005726526Registry ID: 1004688848Envid: ECHO: additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110005726526Registry ID: FINDS: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hilo Quality CleanersFile Under: SOSC NFAResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Bill PerryActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 30Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Hilo Quality Cleaners Diesel SpillUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005726526Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19971018-1909Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.082942Longitude: 19.715910999999998Latitude: Hilo Quality CleanersFile Under: SOSC NFAResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Bill PerryActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) 1004688848 TC5554368.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Permit Closing: 02-21314H-14833. no. 13537; and b. 200 hp York-Shipley Boiler, series 564, serial no. Boiler Works Boiler, model no. S12-0-50-RM7840L-F7T-UL-CSD-1, serial following equipment and associated appurtenances: a. 150 hp Superior York-Shipley Boiler 1. Attachment of this permit encompasses the One (1) 150 hp Superior Boiler Works Boiler and One (1) 200 hpLast of Facility Description: Not reportedValue: 05/30/2018Date Permit Expiration: Hilo, HI 96720Responsible Official City,St,Zip: 865 Kinoole StreetResponsible Official Address: EngineerResponsible Official Title: Wayne TajiriResponsible Official Name: Not reportedPhone Number: 05/31/2013Issued Date: HawaiiIsland: 0521-01-NPernit Number: HI DRYCLEANERS: 02-21314H-14833. no. 13537; andb.200 hp York-Shipley Boiler, series 564, serial no. Boiler Works Boiler, model no. S12-0-50-RM7840L-F7T-UL-CSD-1, serial following equipment and associated appurtenances:a.150 hp Superior York-Shipley Boiler1. Attachment of this permit encompasses the One (1) 150 hp Superior Boiler Works Boiler and One (1) 200 hpDescription: Not reportedClosed Date: 05/30/2018Expiration Date: 05/31/2013Issue Date: Not reportedBusiness Phone: EngineerContact Phone: 96720Mailing Zip: HawaiiMailing State: Wayne TajiriContact Name: HiloMailing City: Not reportedLocale: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) 1004688848 -155.082942Longitude: 19.716066Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 865 KINOOLE STOwner Address: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS, LTDOwner: 9-601694Facility ID: UST: Jose RuizProject Officer: 900075Release ID: 04/10/2002Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601694Facility ID: LUST: 1151 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster B 0.218 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 60 ft. 1/8-1/4 HILO, HI 96720 ENE UST865 KINOOLE ST N/A B8 LUSTHILO QUALITY CLEANERS 1000473220 TC5554368.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OtherSubstance: 6000Tank Capacity: 10/30/1990Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 10/24/1971Date Installed: R-4Tank ID: OtherSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 10/30/1990Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 10/23/1966Date Installed: R-3Tank ID: OtherSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 10/30/1990Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 10/23/1966Date Installed: R-2Tank ID: Address MatchingHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: HILO QUALITY CLEANERS (Continued) 1000473220 GasolineSubstance: 4000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 04/18/1962Date Installed: R-02Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 3000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 04/18/1962Date Installed: R-01Tank ID: Not reportedHorizontal Collection Method Name: Not reportedHorizontal Reference Datum Name: Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 789 NIMITZ HWYOwner Address: SHELL OIL COMPANYOwner: 9-600775Facility ID: UST: 1179 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster B 0.223 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 63 ft. 1/8-1/4 HILO, HI 96720 ENE 895 KINOOLE ST N/A B9 USTCLOSED SHELL SERVICE STATION U001236982 TC5554368.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Used OilSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 04/18/1962Date Installed: R-05Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 6000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 04/19/1971Date Installed: R-04Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 4000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 04/18/1962Date Installed: R-03Tank ID: CLOSED SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued) U001236982 No Further Action Letter - Unrestricted Residential UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential UseUse Restrictions: Petroleum contaminated soilNature of Residual Contamination: Found: DieselNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: No HazardPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hilo Macaroni FactorySDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: No HazardPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hilo Macaroni FactoryEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 1270 ft. 0.241 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 39 ft. 1/8-1/4 HILO, HI 96720 NNE SPILLS639 KINOOLE ST N/A 10 SHWSHILO MACARONI FACTORY S106817724 TC5554368.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.0849Longitude: 19.718997000000002Latitude: Hilo Macaroni Factory LtdFile Under: SOSC NFAResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Mike CrippsActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: UnknownUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: 1,000 gal diesel tank removalUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: Not reportedFacility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20030918-1149Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hilo Macaroni Factory LtdFile Under: SOSC NFAResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Mike CrippsActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: UnknownUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: 1,000 gal diesel tank removalUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: Not reportedFacility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20030918-1149Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: 2004 Review of UST Closure Report, Former Hilo Macaroni Factory Ltd, MarDocument Subject: 2004-178-MSDocument Number: 04/22/2004Document Date: HILO MACARONI FACTORY (Continued) S106817724 TC5554368.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 9-600561Alt Facility ID: 05/02/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: M-2Tank Id: 9-600561Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Risk Retention GroupFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: M-2Tank Id: 9-600561Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Risk Retention GroupFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-1Tank Id: 9-600561Alt Facility ID: HI Financial Assurance: GasolineSubstance: 280Tank Capacity: 10/26/1998Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/07/1982Date Installed: R-1Tank ID: OtherSubstance: 600Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently in UseTank Status: 10/01/1998Date Installed: M-2Tank ID: GPSHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.086850Longitude: 19.709730Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 1177 Bishop Street, Suite 20Owner Address: Hawaiian TelcomOwner: 9-600561Facility ID: UST: Jeffrey UngProject Officer: 990152Release ID: 08/23/1999Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-600561Facility ID: LUST: 1308 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster C 0.248 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 121 ft. 1/8-1/4 Financial AssuranceHILO, HI 96720 South USTEND OF ULILI ST, OFF HINA ST S HILO N/A C11 LUSTHALAI HILL RADIO STATION U003541909 TC5554368.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/02/2015Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: M-2Tank Id: 9-600561Alt Facility ID: 05/02/2015Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-1Tank Id: 9-600561Alt Facility ID: 05/02/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-1Tank Id: HALAI HILL RADIO STATION (Continued) U003541909 Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: HAMAKUA SUGAR F MORGANOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: 808-776-1511Contact telephone: USContact country: PAAUILO, HI 96776 1 SUGAR LANEContact address: FRED GREENContact: PAAUILO, HI 96776 P O BOX 250Mailing address: HID103901328EPA ID: PAAUILO, HI 96776 1 SUGAR LANEFacility address: HAMAKUA SUGAR COFacility name: 07/29/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1308 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster C 0.248 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 121 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOPAAUILO, HI 96776 South FINDS1 SUGAR LANE HID103901328 C12 RCRA-SQGHAMAKUA SUGAR CO INC 1000147227 TC5554368.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource transported off-site. these facilities release directly to air, water, land, or that are from facilities on the amounts of over 300 listed toxic chemicals that US EPA TRIS (Toxics Release Inventory System) contains information Environmental Interest/Information System 110005723324Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: YesUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator extension: Not reportedOwner/operator fax: Not reportedOwner/operator email: 415-555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: HAMAKUA SUGAR CO INC (Continued) 1000147227 TC5554368.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation http://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110005723324DFR URL: 110005723324Registry ID: 1000147227Envid: ECHO: HAMAKUA SUGAR CO INC (Continued) 1000147227 Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedZip Suffix: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential hazards and controls: INST CONTROL: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Eric SadoyamaProject Manager: Not reportedDocument Subject: Not reportedDocument Number: Not reportedDocument Date: Not reportedSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: Controls Required to Manage ContaminationUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Found: Diesel in soilNature of Contamination: Response OngoingResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: LowPriority: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110013786741Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hilo Quality WasheretteSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazards And Controls: LowHazard Priority: Eric SadoyamaProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110013786741Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hilo Quality WasheretteEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 1346 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster B 0.255 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 58 ft. 1/4-1/2 SPILLSHILO, HI 96720 ENE INST CONTROL210 HOKU ST N/A B13 SHWSHILO QUALITY WASHERETTE 1006820674 TC5554368.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.08252999999999Longitude: 19.715371999999999Latitude: Hilo Quality WasheretteFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Terry CorpusActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 200Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Hilo Quality Washerette tank leaking dieselUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013786741Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19960124-0225Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hilo Quality WasheretteFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Not reportedActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 200Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel Fuel #2Substances: Hilo Quality Washerette oil tank leaking diesel #2Units: NoER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013786741Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19960110-1425Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.08252999999999Longitude: 19.715371999999999Latitude: Hilo Quality WasheretteFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Not reportedActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 200Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel Fuel #2Substances: Hilo Quality Washerette oil tank leaking diesel #2Units: NoER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013786741Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19960110-1425Case Number: HILO QUALITY WASHERETTE (Continued) 1006820674 TC5554368.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hilo Quality WasheretteFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Terry CorpusActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 200Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Hilo Quality Washerette tank leaking dieselUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013786741Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19960124-0225Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HILO QUALITY WASHERETTE (Continued) 1006820674 NFA for diesel UST releaseDocument Subject: 2005-223-MSDocument Number: 04/28/2005Document Date: No Further Action Letter - Unrestricted Residential UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: No Hazard Present for Unrestricted Residential UseUse Restrictions: Petroleum contaminated soilNature of Residual Contamination: Not reportedNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: No HazardPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110013778279Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey House (Report)SDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: No HazardPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110013778279Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey House (Report)Environmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 1776 ft. 0.336 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 48 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 East SPILLS1055 KINOOLE ST N/A 14 SHWSSUN SUN LAU CHOP SUEY HOUSE S106820539 TC5554368.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.081073Longitude: 19.712696999999999Latitude: Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey HouseFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Bill PerryActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 150Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Sun Sun Lau, Ltd.Units: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013778279Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19951212-2Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Sun Sun Lau Chop Suey HouseFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Bill PerryActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 150Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Sun Sun Lau, Ltd.Units: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013778279Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19951212-2Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: SUN SUN LAU CHOP SUEY HOUSE (Continued) S106820539 110013789258Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hatada Bakery, FormerEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 1815 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster D 0.344 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 SPILLSHILO, HI 96720 NNE INST CONTROL55 KUKUAU ST N/A D15 SHWSHATADA BAKERY (FORMER)S106817321 TC5554368.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedAssignment End Date: Terry CorpusActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Not reportedSubstances: Heating Oil Tank, Hatada BakeryUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013789258Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19990108-1422Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedZip Suffix: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential hazards and controls: INST CONTROL: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: Not reportedDocument Subject: Not reportedDocument Number: Not reportedDocument Date: Not reportedSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: redevelopment of the property. Must resample when site is redeveloped. investigation is limited until demolition of the building or Based on the site’s tight working conditions, further siteDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: Controls Required to Manage ContaminationUse Restrictions: benzo[a]pyrene in soil and possibly groundwater TPH-D, acenaphthene, floranthene, naphthalene and possiblyNature of Residual Contamination: benzo[a]pyrene sheen and petroleum odor, benzene, acenaphthene, naphthalene, Found: Soil- TPH-D, acenaphthene, fluoranthene, benzo[a]pyrene. water-Nature of Contamination: Response OngoingResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: LowPriority: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110013789258Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hatada Bakery, FormerSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazards And Controls: LowHazard Priority: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: HATADA BAKERY (FORMER) (Continued) S106817321 TC5554368.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hatada BakeryFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Terry CorpusActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Not reportedSubstances: Heating Oil Tank, Hatada BakeryUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013789258Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19990108-1422Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.08401499999999Longitude: 19.719821Latitude: Hatada BakeryFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: HATADA BAKERY (FORMER) (Continued) S106817321 R-2Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 2000Tank Capacity: 10/17/1997Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/13/1983Date Installed: R-1Tank ID: Address MatchingHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.086072Longitude: 19.720304Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 466 KINOOLE STOwner Address: COUNTY OF HAWAII - FIRE DEPTOwner: 9-601085Facility ID: UST: Janet SherrerProject Officer: 950010Release ID: 02/25/1997Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601085Facility ID: LUST: 1833 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster E 0.347 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 18 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 North UST466 KINOOLE ST N/A E16 LUSTHAWAII COUNTY CENTRAL FIRE STATION U001237003 TC5554368.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DieselSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 04/08/1992Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 01/01/1939Date Installed: R-3Tank ID: DieselSubstance: 2000Tank Capacity: 10/17/1994Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/13/1983Date Installed: HAWAII COUNTY CENTRAL FIRE STATION (Continued) U001237003 1995-10-27 04:00:00Start Date: 1SEQ: DISCVRYAction Name: DSAction Code: 00OU: NFF: NNPL: HILO ARSENIC SPILL SITESite Name: HI0001290816EPA ID: 0905305Site ID: 09Region: EPA Perf In-HseCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 2013-11-08 05:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: ARCH SITEAction Name: VSAction Code: 00OU: NFF: NNPL: HILO ARSENIC SPILL SITESite Name: HI0001290816EPA ID: 0905305Site ID: 09Region: SEMS Archive Detail: -155.090000Longitude: 19.725Latitude: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL: NFF: 15001FIPS Code: 02Cong District: HI0001290816EPA ID: 0905305Site ID: SEMS Archive: 2016 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster E 0.382 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 NNE 33B LILIUOKALANI LANE HI0001290816 E17 SEMS-ARCHIVEHILO ARSENIC SPILL SITE 1001032389 TC5554368.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation St PerfCurrent Action Lead: NQual: 2007-05-18 04:00:00Finish Date: Not reportedStart Date: 1SEQ: PAAction Name: PAAction Code: 00OU: NFF: NNPL: HILO ARSENIC SPILL SITESite Name: HI0001290816EPA ID: 0905305Site ID: 09Region: St PerfCurrent Action Lead: Not reportedQual: 1995-10-27 04:00:00Finish Date: HILO ARSENIC SPILL SITE (Continued) 1001032389 09/04/1997Document Date: Historic NFA - Restricted UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: System Prohibit Any Activity That May Disturb the Integrity of the CappingDescription of Restrictions: Engineering Control RequiredEngineering Control: Controls Required to Manage ContaminationUse Restrictions: Arsenic in soil. First 12-18 inches bound in concrete.Nature of Residual Contamination: site. Found: Arsenic in soil. Contaminated soil bound in concrete slab onNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazard And Controls: EPALead Agency: 110009278824Facility Registry Identifier: HI0001290816HID Number: Hilo Arsenic Spill SiteSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Laura YoungProject Manager: Preliminary Assessment/Site InspectionProgram: EPALead Agency: 110009278824Facility Registry Identifier: HI0001290816HID Number: Hilo Arsenic Spill SiteEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 2016 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster E 0.382 mi.SPILLS Relative: Lower Actual: 13 ft. 1/4-1/2 INST CONTROLHILO, HI 96720 NNE ENG CONTROLS33B LILIUOKALANI LN N/A E18 SHWSHILO ARSENIC S108008859 TC5554368.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Mike CrippsActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 30Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Sodium Arsenate, lead and cadmiumSubstances: Hilo ArsenicUnits: YesER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110009278824Facility Registry Id: HI0001290816HID Number: 19950509Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.08469199999999Longitude: 19.719481999999999Latitude: Hilo ArsenicFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Mike CrippsActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 30Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Sodium Arsenate, lead and cadmiumSubstances: Hilo ArsenicUnits: YesER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110009278824Facility Registry Id: HI0001290816HID Number: 19950509Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedZip Suffix: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential hazards and controls: INST CONTROL: Engineering Control RequiredEngineering Control: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazards And Controls: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedZip Suffix: Not reportedSupplemental Location Text: ENG CONTROLS: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Laura YoungProject Manager: NFA letter for Hilo Arsenic SiteDocument Subject: 1997-326-LYDocument Number: HILO ARSENIC (Continued)S108008859 TC5554368.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hilo ArsenicFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Mike CrippsActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 30Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Sodium Arsenate, lead and cadmiumSubstances: Hilo ArsenicUnits: YesER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110009278824Facility Registry Id: HI0001290816HID Number: 19950509Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.08506Longitude: 19.720400000000001Latitude: Hilo ArsenicFile Under: HILO ARSENIC (Continued)S108008859 04/15/1985Date Installed: R-3865-2Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 12000Tank Capacity: 12/10/2001Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 04/15/1985Date Installed: R-3865-1Tank ID: GPSHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.083509Longitude: 19.720137Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: P. O. Box 25376Owner Address: Tosco Marketing CompanyOwner: 9-600010Facility ID: UST: Richard TakabaProject Officer: 020021Release ID: 12/04/2002Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-600010Facility ID: LUST: 2058 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster D 0.390 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/4-1/2 Financial AssuranceHILO, HI 96720 NNE UST376 KILAUEA AVE N/A D19 LUSTWONG’S 76 UNION L-3865 U001236858 TC5554368.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-3865-3Tank Id: 9-600010Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-3865-2Tank Id: 9-600010Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-3865-4Tank Id: 9-600010Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-3865-1Tank Id: 9-600010Alt Facility ID: HI Financial Assurance: Used OilSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: 12/10/2001Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 04/15/1985Date Installed: R-3865-4Tank ID: DieselSubstance: 6000Tank Capacity: 12/10/2001Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 04/15/1985Date Installed: R-3865-3Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 12000Tank Capacity: 12/10/2001Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: WONG’S 76 UNION L-3865 (Continued) U001236858 930089Release ID: 02/25/1994Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601615Facility ID: LUST: 2158 ft. 0.409 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 15 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 NE UST475 KILAUEA AVE N/A 20 LUSTGOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO U001237066 TC5554368.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Used OilSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: 05/04/1993Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 01/01/1972Date Installed: R-1Tank ID: Address MatchingHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.082039Longitude: 19.719618Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: Not reportedOwner Address: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.Owner: 9-601615Facility ID: UST: Jose RuizProject Officer: GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO (Continued) U001237066 Hazardous SubstanceSubstance: 300Tank Capacity: 11/04/2000Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: Not reportedDate Installed: R-BTank ID: DieselSubstance: 250Tank Capacity: 11/04/2000Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: Not reportedDate Installed: R-ATank ID: Address MatchingHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.084512Longitude: 19.721187Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 266 KILAUEA AVEOwner Address: THE MODERN CLEANERSOwner: 9-603658Facility ID: UST: Shumin LiuProject Officer: 010026Release ID: 05/14/2001Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-603658Facility ID: LUST: 2181 ft. 0.413 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 12 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 NNE UST266 KILAUEA AVE N/A 21 LUSTTHE MODERN CLEANERS U003762161 TC5554368.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DieselSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: 11/04/2000Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: Not reportedDate Installed: R-ETank ID: DieselSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: 11/04/2000Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: Not reportedDate Installed: R-DTank ID: DieselSubstance: 300Tank Capacity: 11/04/2000Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: Not reportedDate Installed: R-CTank ID: THE MODERN CLEANERS (Continued) U003762161 Historic NFA - Incomplete DocumentationSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: UndeterminedUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Not reportedNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: Hazard UndeterminedPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110013778689Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Roberts Bakery Inc. Boiler UST RemovalSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard UndeterminedPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: UnassignedProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110013778689Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Roberts Bakery Inc. Boiler UST RemovalEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 2235 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster F 0.423 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 North SPILLS374 KINOOLE ST N/A F22 SHWSROBERTS BAKERY, BOILER UST REMOVAL S104657505 TC5554368.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Title Holding Co.File Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Mike CrippsActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Roberts Bakery Inc.Units: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013778689Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19950629Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: UnassignedProject Manager: Site Screening Sheet for Robert’s BakeryDocument Subject: Not reportedDocument Number: 12/26/1996Document Date: ROBERTS BAKERY, BOILER UST REMOVAL (Continued) S104657505 GasolineSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/07/1979Date Installed: R-1Tank ID: Address MatchingHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.087504Longitude: 19.721771Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 340 KINOOLE StOwner Address: YAMADA FURNITUREOwner: 9-601371Facility ID: UST: Lene IchinotsuboProject Officer: 920067Release ID: 07/31/1997Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601371Facility ID: LUST: 2367 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster F 0.448 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 34 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 North UST340 KINOOLE ST N/A F23 LUSTI. YAMADA FURNITURE STORE, LTD. U003155217 TC5554368.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GasolineSubstance: 500Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/06/1978Date Installed: R-3Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 05/06/1978Date Installed: R-2Tank ID: I. YAMADA FURNITURE STORE, LTD. (Continued) U003155217 DieselSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: 12/27/1996Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: Not reportedDate Installed: R-1Tank ID: Address MatchingHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.082862Longitude: 19.721124Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: Address UnknownOwner Address: UNDETERMINED AT THIS TIMEOwner: 9-603532Facility ID: UST: Renato ManiulitProject Officer: 990206Release ID: 06/25/1999Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-603532Facility ID: LUST: 2397 ft. 0.454 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 NNE USTALENAIO STREAM FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT N/A 24 LUSTALENAIO STREAM FLOOD CONTROL PROJECT U004155574 900118Release ID: 11/23/1993Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-600456Facility ID: LUST: 2511 ft. 0.476 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 25 ft. 1/4-1/2 Financial AssuranceHILO, HI 96720 ENE UST777 KILAUEA AVE N/A 25 LUSTJ C PENNEY CO., INC.U003155159 TC5554368.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DieselSubstance: 500Tank Capacity: 05/01/2005Date Closed: Permanently out of UseTank Status: Not reportedDate Installed: r-5Tank ID: Used OilSubstance: 500Tank Capacity: 03/11/1992Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 03/26/1974Date Installed: R-4Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: 03/10/1992Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 03/26/1974Date Installed: R-3Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: 03/10/1992Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 03/30/1974Date Installed: R-2Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: 03/10/1992Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 03/30/1974Date Installed: R-1Tank ID: Address MatchingHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.078921Longitude: 19.716536Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: P.O. BOX 10001Owner Address: J.C. PENNEYOwner: 9-600456Facility ID: UST: Deena KamProject Officer: 050022Release ID: 12/30/2011Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed with EHEFacility Status: 9-600456Facility ID: Deena KamProject Officer: J C PENNEY CO., INC. (Continued)U003155159 TC5554368.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-2Tank Id: 9-600456Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-1Tank Id: 9-600456Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-3Tank Id: 9-600456Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-600456Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently out of UseTank Status: r-5Tank Id: 9-600456Alt Facility ID: HI Financial Assurance: J C PENNEY CO., INC. (Continued)U003155159 Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 01/01/1941Date Installed: R-1Tank ID: Not reportedHorizontal Collection Method Name: Not reportedHorizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.085572Longitude: 19.722405Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 203 KILAUEA AVEOwner Address: STANLEY I. HARAOwner: 9-603459Facility ID: UST: Jeffrey UngProject Officer: 990085Release ID: 07/20/1999Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-603459Facility ID: LUST: 2569 ft. 0.487 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 14 ft. 1/4-1/2 HILO, HI 96720 North USTEAST OF KILAUEA AVE AND MAMO ST TMK 2-3-09:09 N/A 26 LUSTSTANLEY I. HARA U003402995 TC5554368.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GasolineSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: 11/11/1998Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 01/01/1938Date Installed: R-4Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 550Tank Capacity: 11/11/1998Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 01/01/1938Date Installed: R-3Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 11/10/1998Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 01/01/1940Date Installed: R-2Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 11/10/1998Date Closed: STANLEY I. HARA (Continued)U003402995 No additional information available Manufactured Gas Plants: 2707 ft. 0.513 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 11 ft. 1/2-1 HILO, HI 96720 NNE 51-53 PONAHAWAI ST N/A 27 EDR MGPHILO GAS COMPANY LTD 1008409004 NFAHazard Priority: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110013772471Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Larry’s Kaikoo ChevronEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 2773 ft. 0.525 mi.Financial Assurance Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/2-1 USTHILO, HI 96720 ENE LUST835 KILAUEA AVE N/A 28 SHWSLARRY’S CHEVRON U001237010 TC5554368.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation GasolineSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: 08/20/2003Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/17/1983Date Installed: R-2Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: 08/20/2003Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/17/1983Date Installed: R-1Tank ID: GPSHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.078374Longitude: 19.716121Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 91-480 MALAKOLE ST.Owner Address: CHEVRON PRODUCTS COMPANYOwner: 9-601136Facility ID: UST: Richard TakabaProject Officer: 030044Release ID: 09/07/2004Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601136Facility ID: LUST: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: NFA letter for Larry’s Kilauea ChevronDocument Subject: 2004-252-MSDocument Number: 06/30/2004Document Date: No Further Action Letter - Unrestricted Residential UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: No Hazard Present for Unrestricted Residential UseUse Restrictions: Petroleum contaminated soilNature of Residual Contamination: Not reportedNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: No HazardPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110013772471Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Larry’s Kaikoo ChevronSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: No HazardPotential Hazards And Controls: LARRY’S CHEVRON (Continued)U001237010 TC5554368.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-1Tank Id: 9-601136Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-2Tank Id: 9-601136Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-3Tank Id: 9-601136Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601136Alt Facility ID: HI Financial Assurance: Used OilSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 08/20/2003Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/17/1983Date Installed: R-4Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: 08/20/2003Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/17/1983Date Installed: R-3Tank ID: LARRY’S CHEVRON (Continued)U001237010 NFAHazard Priority: Clarence CallahanProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110005725581Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Western Auto Store Petroleum ReleaseEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 3025 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster G 0.573 mi.SPILLS Relative: Lower Actual: 32 ft. 1/2-1 INST CONTROLHILO, HI 96720 North LUST141 HAILI ST N/A G29 SHWSWESTERN AUTO HYDRAULIC OIL S106821132 TC5554368.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Western AutoFile Under: Closed Incomplete DocumentationResult: 2017-01-31 00:00:00Assignment End Date: Curtis MartinActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 10Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Hydraulic OilSubstances: Western Auto Hydraulic oilUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005725581Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20000808-1222Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedZip Suffix: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential hazards and controls: INST CONTROL: Richard TakabaProject Officer: 100022Release ID: 08/02/2010Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-603900Facility ID: LUST: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Clarence CallahanProject Manager: No Further ActionDocument Subject: 2008-415-CACDocument Number: 06/20/2008Document Date: No Further Action Letter - Restricted UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: Controls Required to Manage ContaminationUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Not reportedNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110005725581Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Western Auto Store Petroleum ReleaseSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazards And Controls: WESTERN AUTO HYDRAULIC OIL (Continued) S106821132 TC5554368.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Western AutoFile Under: Closed Incomplete DocumentationResult: 2017-01-31 00:00:00Assignment End Date: Curtis MartinActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 10Numerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Hydraulic OilSubstances: Western Auto Hydraulic oilUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005725581Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20000808-1222Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.087279Longitude: 19.723680999999999Latitude: WESTERN AUTO HYDRAULIC OIL (Continued) S106821132 No Further Action Letter - Unrestricted Residential UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential UseUse Restrictions: Petroleum and hydraulic fluid in soil.Nature of Residual Contamination: Not reportedNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: No HazardPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110005726679Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Duke’s Downtown ChevronSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: No HazardPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Anna FernandezProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110005726679Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Duke’s Downtown ChevronEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 3121 ft.Financial AssuranceSite 2 of 3 in cluster G 0.591 mi.SPILLS Relative: Lower Actual: 44 ft. 1/2-1 USTHILO, HI 96720 North LUST192 KINOOLE ST N/A G30 SHWSDOWNTOWN CHEVRON 1000601381 TC5554368.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently in UseTank Status: 07/19/1983Date Installed: 92Tank ID: GasoholSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently in UseTank Status: 07/19/1983Date Installed: 89Tank ID: GasoholSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently in UseTank Status: 07/19/1983Date Installed: 87Tank ID: GPSHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.088170Longitude: 19.723570Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 192 Kinoole StOwner Address: K&V Properties LLCOwner: 9-601223Facility ID: UST: Josh NagashimaProject Officer: 980089Release ID: 12/15/1998Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601223Facility ID: Josh NagashimaProject Officer: 050032Release ID: 12/05/2008Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601223Facility ID: Josh NagashimaProject Officer: 040042Release ID: 05/03/2006Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601223Facility ID: LUST: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Anna FernandezProject Manager: NFA for Release ID 20040511-1411Document Subject: 2006-193-AFDocument Number: 03/30/2006Document Date: DOWNTOWN CHEVRON (Continued) 1000601381 TC5554368.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: 92Tank Id: 9-601223Alt Facility ID: HI Financial Assurance: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Chevron Products CompanyFile Under: SOSC NFAResult: 2004-06-14 00:00:00Assignment End Date: Curtis MartinActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Baseline, found unidentified diesel and oilUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005726679Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20040511-1411Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.08830399999999Longitude: 19.723378Latitude: Chevron Products CompanyFile Under: SOSC NFAResult: 2004-06-14 00:00:00Assignment End Date: Curtis MartinActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Baseline, found unidentified diesel and oilUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110005726679Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20040511-1411Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: Used OilSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 05/04/2005Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 07/19/1983Date Installed: R-4Tank ID: GasoholSubstance: DOWNTOWN CHEVRON (Continued) 1000601381 TC5554368.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02/01/2015Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: 92Tank Id: 9-601223Alt Facility ID: 02/01/2015Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: 87Tank Id: 9-601223Alt Facility ID: 02/01/2015Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: 89Tank Id: 9-601223Alt Facility ID: 02/01/2015Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601223Alt Facility ID: 02/01/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601223Alt Facility ID: 02/01/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: 89Tank Id: 9-601223Alt Facility ID: 02/01/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently in UseTank Status: 87Tank Id: 9-601223Alt Facility ID: 02/01/2010Expiration Date: DOWNTOWN CHEVRON (Continued) 1000601381 HEER and SHWBLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Keawe 76 Service Station No. 202Environmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 3243 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster G 0.614 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 24 ft. 1/2-1 HILO, HI 96720 North SPILLS210 KEAWE ST N/A G31 SHWSKEAWE 76 SERVICE STATION NO. 202 S115488707 TC5554368.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedLongitude: Not reportedLatitude: Mid Pac PetroleumFile Under: SOSC NFAResult: 2013-06-17 00:00:00Assignment End Date: Adam TeekellActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 25Numerical Quantity: <Less Or Greater Than: Hydrolic OilSubstances: Hydraulic Oil Contaminated Soil in HiloUnits: NoneER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: Not reportedFacility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20130613-1200Case Number: From 76 Station Service BaySupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Cal MiyaharaProject Manager: Petroleum Station No. 202, TMK 3-2-3-006-009 Keawe 76 Service Station 210 Keawe St Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Mid Pac NFA letter for the Hydraulic Hoist Closure and Closure AssessmentDocument Subject: 2013-432-CMMDocument Number: 08/21/2013Document Date: No Further Action Letter - Unrestricted Residential UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential UseUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Found: TPH-O found in soil beneath both hydraulic hoists.Nature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: No HazardPotential Hazard And Controls: HEER and SHWBLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Keawe 76 Service Station No. 202SDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: No HazardPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Cal MiyaharaProject Manager: StateProgram: KEAWE 76 SERVICE STATION NO. 202 (Continued) S115488707 TC5554368.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Hilo Shopping CenterFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Liz GalvezActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 25Numerical Quantity: <Less Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Hilo Shopping Center non-regulated UST releaseUnits: NoER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: Not reportedFacility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20040510-1040Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: NFA for 550-gallon diesel USTDocument Subject: 2005-508-MSDocument Number: 10/03/2005Document Date: No Further Action Letter - Unrestricted Residential UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: No Hazard Present for Unrestricted Residential UseUse Restrictions: Petroleum contaminated soilNature of Residual Contamination: Found: Diesel in soilNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: No HazardPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hilo Shopping CenterSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: No HazardPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Hilo Shopping CenterEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 3533 ft. 0.669 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 35 ft. 1/2-1 HILO, HI 96720 ESE SPILLS1255 KILAUEA AVE N/A 32 SHWSHILO SHOPPING CENTER S106817730 TC5554368.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Hilo Shopping CenterFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Liz GalvezActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: GallonsUnits: 25Numerical Quantity: <Less Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Hilo Shopping Center non-regulated UST releaseUnits: NoER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: Not reportedFacility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20040510-1040Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.07633899999999Longitude: 19.710069000000001Latitude: HILO SHOPPING CENTER (Continued) S106817730 Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: A soil management plan is required.Description of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: Controls Required to Manage ContaminationUse Restrictions: exceeding HDOH EALs remains on site 3 feet below the station building. Subsurface soil with TPH-G, UH-d, UH-o and total xylene concentrationsNature of Residual Contamination: Found: TPH-O of 0.736 mg/l in groundwater in MW-3Nature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110013783646Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Bayside Chevron ServiceSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Anna FernandezProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110013783646Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Bayside Chevron ServiceEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Kamehameha and Pauahi Street, SE cornerSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: Financial Assurance 3611 ft.SPILLS 0.684 mi.INST CONTROL Relative: Lower Actual: 4 ft. 1/2-1 USTHILO, HI 96720 NE LUST774 KAMEHAMEHA AVE N/A 33 SHWSKHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON U001237007 TC5554368.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation R-005Tank ID: GasoholSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently In UseTank Status: 08/21/1983Date Installed: 3Tank ID: GasoholSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently In UseTank Status: 08/21/1983Date Installed: 2Tank ID: GasolineSubstance: 10000Tank Capacity: Not reportedDate Closed: Currently In UseTank Status: 08/21/1983Date Installed: 1Tank ID: GPSHorizontal Collection Method Name: NAD83Horizontal Reference Datum Name: -155.078450Longitude: 19.721900Latitude: Hilo, 96720 96720Owner City,St,Zip: 774 Kamehameha AveOwner Address: KHI dba Bayside ChevronOwner: 9-601133Facility ID: UST: Richard TakabaProject Officer: 040017Release ID: 04/20/2004Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601133Facility ID: Richard TakabaProject Officer: 970106Release ID: 02/01/1999Facility Status Date: Site Cleanup Completed (NFA)Facility Status: 9-601133Facility ID: LUST: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Anna FernandezProject Manager: No Further Action with Institutional Controls DeterminationDocument Subject: 2007-269-AFDocument Number: 04/27/2007Document Date: No Further Action Letter - Restricted UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON (Continued) U001237007 TC5554368.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Mike CrippsActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Not reportedSubstances: Bayside Chevron Contaminated SoilUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013783646Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20040629-1542Case Number: Kamehameha and Pauahi Street, SE cornerSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.07945599999999Longitude: 19.722125999999999Latitude: Chevron Products CompanyFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: 2005-08-30 00:00:00Assignment End Date: Mike CrippsActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Not reportedSubstances: Bayside Chevron Contaminated SoilUnits: Not reportedER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013783646Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 20040629-1542Case Number: Kamehameha and Pauahi Street, SE cornerSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: Government - Hawaii Dept. of Health Letter IssuedInstitutional Control: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedZip Suffix: Kamehameha and Pauahi Street, SE cornerSupplemental Location: Hazard Managed With ControlsPotential hazards and controls: INST CONTROL: Used OilSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 04/03/1997Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 08/21/1983Date Installed: R-4Tank ID: Used OilSubstance: 1000Tank Capacity: 09/01/1983Date Closed: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: 08/20/1969Date Installed: KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON (Continued) U001237007 TC5554368.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 3Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 3Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: GuaranteeFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-005Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-005Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-005Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: GuaranteeFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 2Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: HI Financial Assurance: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Chevron Products CompanyFile Under: Refer to ISSTResult: 2005-08-30 00:00:00Assignment End Date: KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON (Continued) U001237007 TC5554368.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/09/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: 05/09/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 3Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: 05/09/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 1Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 1Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: Self InsuredFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 1Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: GuaranteeFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 2Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: GuaranteeFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 1Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 2Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: OtherFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: Not reportedExpiration Date: GuaranteeFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON (Continued) U001237007 TC5554368.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 05/09/2016Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 1Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: 05/09/2016Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 2Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: 05/09/2016Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 3Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: 05/09/2016Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-4Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: 05/09/2016Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-005Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: 05/09/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Currently In UseTank Status: 2Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: 05/09/2010Expiration Date: InsuranceFRTYPE: Permanently Out of UseTank Status: R-005Tank Id: 9-601133Alt Facility ID: KHI INC. DBA BAYSIDE CHEVRON (Continued) U001237007 Steve MowProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: SFC Minoru Kunieda U.S. Army Reserve CenterEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 4011 ft. 0.760 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 136 ft. 1/2-1 HILO, HI 96720 SSE 470 W LANIKAULA ST N/A 34 SHWSSFC MINORU KUNIEDA U.S. ARMY RESERVE CENTER S113230517 TC5554368.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Steve MowProject Manager: Reserve Center No Further Action Determination with for SFC Minoru Kunieda U.S. ArmyDocument Subject: 2012-527-SPMDocument Number: 09/14/2012Document Date: No Further Action Letter - Unrestricted Residential UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: No Engineering Control RequiredEngineering Control: No Hazard Present For Unrestricted Residential UseUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Found: Arsenic, TPH-DNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: No HazardPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: SFC Minoru Kunieda U.S. Army Reserve CenterSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: No HazardPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: SFC MINORU KUNIEDA U.S. ARMY RESERVE CENTER (Continued) S113230517 Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: UndeterminedUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Not reportedNature of Contamination: Not reportedResponse: Assessment OngoingAssessment: LowPriority: Hazard UndeterminedPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: UST excavated Bishop and KamehamehaSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard UndeterminedPotential Hazards And Controls: LowHazard Priority: John PeardProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: UST excavated Bishop and KamehamehaEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 4058 ft. 0.769 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 4 ft. 1/2-1 HILO, HI 96720 NE BISHOP ST AND KAMEHAMEHA AVE N/A 35 SHWSUST EXCAVATED BISHOP AND KAMEHAMEHA S118943724 TC5554368.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HI 96720 (808) 933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,Contact Information: John PeardProject Manager: Not reportedDocument Subject: Not reportedDocument Number: Not reportedDocument Date: Not reportedSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: UST EXCAVATED BISHOP AND KAMEHAMEHA (Continued) S118943724 110013781201Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19991112-1052Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: HI SPILLS: (808) 586-4249 2385 Waimano Home Rd, Pearl City, HI 96782Contact Information: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: NFA letter for diesel UST at Excelsior Dairy HiloDocument Subject: 2005-671-MSDocument Number: 12/19/2005Document Date: No Further Action Letter - Unrestricted Residential UseSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: No Hazard Present for Unrestricted Residential UseUse Restrictions: DieselNature of Residual Contamination: Found: DieselNature of Contamination: Response CompleteResponse: Response NecessaryAssessment: NFAPriority: No HazardPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110013781201Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Exempt UST Closure at Excelsior DairySDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: No HazardPotential Hazards And Controls: NFAHazard Priority: Mark SutterfieldProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110013781201Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Exempt UST Closure at Excelsior DairyEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 5072 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster H 0.961 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 20 ft. 1/2-1 HILO, HI 96720 East SPILLS458 KEKUANAOA ST N/A H36 SHWSEXEMPT UST CLOSURE AT EXCELSIOR DAIRY 1006820203 TC5554368.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -155.071966Longitude: 19.711480000000002Latitude: Excelsior Dairy, Inc.File Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Bill PerryActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Exempt UST Closure @ Excelsior DairyUnits: NoER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: 110013781201Facility Registry Id: Not reportedHID Number: 19991112-1052Case Number: Not reportedSupplemental Loc. Text: HawaiiIsland: -155.307075Longitude: 19.669319999999999Latitude: Excelsior Dairy, Inc.File Under: Refer to ISSTResult: Not reportedAssignment End Date: Bill PerryActivity Lead: ResponseActivity Type: Not reportedUnits: Not reportedNumerical Quantity: Not reportedLess Or Greater Than: Diesel FuelSubstances: Exempt UST Closure @ Excelsior DairyUnits: NoER: HEER EP&RLead and Program: EXEMPT UST CLOSURE AT EXCELSIOR DAIRY (Continued) 1006820203 HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Old Hilo Canec PlantSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard PresentPotential Hazards And Controls: LowHazard Priority: John PeardProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: Not reportedFacility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Old Hilo Canec PlantEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Not reportedSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 5163 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster H 0.978 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/2-1 HILO, HI 96720 East KEKUANAOA ST AND MILILANI ST N/A H37 SHWSOLD HILO CANEC PLANT S123106617 TC5554368.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HI 96720 (808) 933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,Contact Information: John PeardProject Manager: Not reportedDocument Subject: Not reportedDocument Number: Not reportedDocument Date: Not reportedSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: Controls Required to Manage ContaminationUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Found: Arsenic in soil.Nature of Contamination: Not reportedResponse: Assessment OngoingAssessment: LowPriority: Hazard PresentPotential Hazard And Controls: OLD HILO CANEC PLANT (Continued) S123106617 John PeardProject Manager: Not reportedDocument Subject: Not reportedDocument Number: Not reportedDocument Date: Not reportedSite Closure Type: Not reportedWithin Designated Areawide Contamination: Not reportedInstitutional Control: Not reportedDescription of Restrictions: Not reportedEngineering Control: Controls Required to Manage ContaminationUse Restrictions: Not reportedNature of Residual Contamination: Found: Arsenic in soil.Nature of Contamination: Not reportedResponse: Assessment OngoingAssessment: LowPriority: Hazard PresentPotential Hazard And Controls: HEERLead Agency: 110013775619Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Waiakea Upland Arsenic SiteSDAR Environmental Interest Name: HawaiiIsland: Hazard PresentPotential Hazards And Controls: LowHazard Priority: John PeardProject Manager: StateProgram: HEERLead Agency: 110013775619Facility Registry Identifier: Not reportedHID Number: Waiakea Upland Arsenic SiteEnvironmental Interest: HawaiiIsland: Portion of Hawaii Cane Products siteSupplemental Location: Not reportedOrganization: SHWS: 5163 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster H 0.978 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 19 ft. 1/2-1 HILO, HI 96720 East CORNER OF MILILANI AND KEKUANAO STREETS N/A H38 SHWSWAIAKEA UPLAND ARSENIC SITE S110061849 TC5554368.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation HI 96720 (808) 933-9921 Environmental Health Bldg, 1582 Kamehameha Ave, Hilo,Contact Information: WAIAKEA UPLAND ARSENIC SITE (Continued) S110061849 TC5554368.2s Page 64 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 9 records.HILO S113230477MAUNA KEA SUGAR - HILO SUGAR PESTIAMAUULU RD96720SHWSHILO S118943674HAWAII COUNTY KAMEHAMEHA AVENUE IMKAMEHAMEHA AVE96720SHWSHILO 1011487908KILAUEA VOLCANO AIR MONITORINGKILAUEA VOLCANO SEMSHILO S107022566HILO JUDICIARY CENTER PROJECTKILAUEA AVE96720SHWS, ENG CONTROLS, INST CONTHILO S118943725WAIAKEA MILL COMPANY - CAMP 1KOHOLA, UHU, MANINI, KOLE STRE96720SHWSHILO S115554812ARSENIC MILILANI STREET IN HILOMILILANI ST96720SHWS, INST CONTROL, SPILLSHILO 1003879704HILO BAY FRONT SOCCER FIELDOFF KAMEHAMEHA AVE. BET PAUAHI96720SEMS-ARCHIVEHILO S118943731WAILOA RIVER STATE RECREATION AREAPIILANI ST, KAMEHAMEHA AVE, BI96720SHWSHILO S113230450HELCO POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER NO.POLE 7, KAUMANA DR96720SHWSTC5554368.2s Page 65 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC5554368.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 01/04/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/29/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5554368.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 12/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/29/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5554368.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 10/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 10/15/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS SHWS: Sites List Facilities, sites or areas in which the Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response has an interest, has investigated or may investigate under HRS 128D (includes CERCLIS sites). Date of Government Version: 09/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4249 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF: Permitted Landfills in the State of Hawaii Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 09/17/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2013 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4245 Last EDR Contact: 12/27/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. Date of Government Version: 08/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4228 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 05/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 136 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies UST: Underground Storage Tank Database Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 08/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/10/2018 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4228 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 05/08/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 04/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/24/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/25/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Control Sites A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 404-586-4249 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls Voluntary Remediation Program and Brownfields sites with institutional controls in place. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4249 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies VCP: Voluntary Response Program Sites Sites participating in the Voluntary Response Program. The purpose of the VRP is to streamline the cleanup process in a way that will encourage prospective developers, lenders, and purchasers to voluntarily cleanup properties. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4249 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields Sites With certain legal exclusions and additions, the term ‘brownfield site’ means real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Date of Government Version: 09/27/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/04/2018 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4249 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 12/17/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/18/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 12/18/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/01/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5554368.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/13/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 01/17/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 02/01/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/13/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CDL: Clandestine Drug Lab Listing A listing of clandestine drug lab site locations. Date of Government Version: 08/04/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2010 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4249 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 09/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/27/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS: Release Notifications Releases of hazardous substances to the environment reported to the Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response since 1988. Date of Government Version: 08/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/21/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/11/2018 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4249 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/11/2013 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records TC5554368.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2018 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22/2019 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. TC5554368.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/25/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 02/04/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 11/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/20/2018 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 11/09/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 198 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 12/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/01/2019 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/10/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/12/2018 Number of Days to Update: 2 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 11/16/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. TC5554368.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 10/26/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/06/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 66 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 08/13/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/04/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 02/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. TC5554368.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/14/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 01/11/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22/2019 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 12/05/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. TC5554368.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 12/03/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 01/25/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 10/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/03/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/09/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/30/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/18/2019 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5554368.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/07/2018 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2017 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 11/21/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/20/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 12/14/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/08/2018 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/29/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 11/15/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2019 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 01/31/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 09/02/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 01/07/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/18/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 05/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 11/30/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 09/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/14/2018 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 703-704-1564 Last EDR Contact: 01/14/2019 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/29/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. TC5554368.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 08/22/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/22/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/05/2018 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 11/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/04/2019 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly AIRS: List of Permitted Facilities A listing of permitted facilities in the state. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2019 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4200 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies DRYCLEANERS: Permitted Drycleaner Facility Listing A listing of permitted drycleaner facilities in the state. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2019 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2019 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4200 Last EDR Contact: 12/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 12/21/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/26/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2019 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4226 Last EDR Contact: 12/19/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD: Lead Inspection Listing Lead inspections Date of Government Version: 12/07/2018 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/11/2018 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/25/2019 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-5800 Last EDR Contact: 12/07/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/25/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies UIC: Underground Injection Wells Listing A listing of underground injection well locations. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/09/2013 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Department of Health Telephone: 808-586-4258 Last EDR Contact: 11/26/2018 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/11/2019 Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. TC5554368.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Health in Hawaii. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/08/2014 Number of Days to Update: 191 Source: Department of Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Health in Hawaii. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 200 Source: Department of Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5554368.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Health in Hawaii. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/03/2014 Number of Days to Update: 186 Source: Department of Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. TC5554368.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Office of Planning Telephone: 808-587-2895 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5554368.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC5554368.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2013Version Date: 5949390 HILO, HITarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 91 ft. above sea levelElevation: 2181053.0UTM Y (Meters): 281247.3UTM X (Meters): Zone 5Universal Tranverse Mercator: 155.087087 - 155˚ 5’ 13.51’’Longitude (West): 19.71405 - 19˚ 42’ 50.58’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES HILO, HI 96720 NOT REPORTED A0705 HILO KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC5554368.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 91 ft. North South West East2562392372031881701411189991856342202022500359333338321252205152117100918573381411061317General NEGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5554368.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapHILO NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property Not Reported Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA Q3 Flood data1551660880C Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5554368.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION -Category:-Era: -System: -Series: N/ACode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 1 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC5554368.2s Page A-6 Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: silty clay loamSoil Surface Texture: HiloSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Max: Min: Min: 0.02 Max: 0.42 Not reportedA-8bedrock18 inches 7 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 0.02 Max: 0.42 Not reportedA-8muck 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer. Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group: muckSoil Surface Texture: KeaukahaSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5554368.2s Page A-7 FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile EastUSGS40000268579 A2 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 5.6 Max: 6.5 Min: 0.42 Max: 4.23 OH-T (proposed) Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysilty clay loam59 inches11 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 6.5 Min: 0.42 Max: 4.23 OH-T (proposed) Soils. 200), Clayey passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysilty clay loam11 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5554368.2s Page A-8 1/2 - 1 Mile EastHI1100000004508 A3 1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNEHI1100000004527 1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.20040010 0 300 TC5554368.2s Page A-10 Not ReportedInital Water Level (ft): IndustrialMajor Well Use: 35Perforated Casing Depth: 25Solid Casing Depth: 35Well Depth (ft): Not ReportedGround Elevation (ft): 14Casing Diameter (in): PercussionWell Construction Type: Roscoe Moss Hawaii IncDriller: Not ReportedOriginal Well Name: 1971Year Drillled: 700Pump Rate (g/m): Waiakea VillasLand Owner: Waiakea VillasWell Owner: Waiakea VillageWell Name: 8-4204-001Well ID: A3 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower HI1100000004508HI WELLS ftWell Hole Depth Units: 35Well Hole Depth: ftWell Depth Units: 35Well Depth: 19710101Construction Date: Not ReportedAquifer Type: Not ReportedFormation Type: Not ReportedAquifer: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area Unts: Not ReportedContrib Drainage Area: Not ReportedDrainage Area Units: Not ReportedDrainage Area: 20010000HUC: Not ReportedDescription: WellType: 8-4204-01 WAIAKEA VILLAGEMonitor Location: USGS Hawaii Water Science CenterOrganization Name: USGS-HIOrganization ID: A2 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000268579FED USGS 10.0360795313Min to pump 5 volumes: Not ReportedTransmissivity: 2/9/2015Latest WCR2 Report: 2/9/2015Latest WCR1 Report: Not ReportedLatest Head: 47.6Pump Intake Depth: 0.086Pump Capacity (MM gal/day): 2014Year Installed: -2Solid Casing Bottom Elevation: -12Hole Bottom Elevation: Not ReportedDraft Year: Not ReportedMinimum Chloride Level: Not ReportedMax Chloride Level: Not ReportedTemp Unit: Not ReportedTest Water Temp: Not ReportedTest Chloride Content (MG/L): Not ReportedTest Drawdown Rate (ft): Not ReportedTest Pump Rate (g/m): Not ReportedDate Tested: 20Chloride Content (mg/L): 1.6Water Level After Install: 1.6Water Level After Drilling: 1.6Inital Water Level (ft): Single and Multi Low-Rise and High-Rise HouseholdsMajor Well Use: 52Perforated Casing Depth: 42Solid Casing Depth: 52Well Depth (ft): 40Ground Elevation (ft): 6Casing Diameter (in): RotaryWell Construction Type: Derrick’s Well Drilling & Pump Services, LLCDriller: Not ReportedOriginal Well Name: 2014Year Drillled: 60Pump Rate (g/m): HJC Development CorporationLand Owner: HJC Development CorporationWell Owner: Del Mar IIWell Name: 8-4305-002Well ID: 1 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower HI1100000004527HI WELLS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5554368.2s Page A-11 Not ReportedMin to pump 5 volumes: Not ReportedTransmissivity: Not ReportedLatest WCR2 Report: 8/6/1971Latest WCR1 Report: Not ReportedLatest Head: Not ReportedPump Intake Depth: 1.008Pump Capacity (MM gal/day): Not ReportedYear Installed: Not ReportedSolid Casing Bottom Elevation: Not ReportedHole Bottom Elevation: Not ReportedDraft Year: Not ReportedMinimum Chloride Level: Not ReportedMax Chloride Level: Not ReportedTemp Unit: Not ReportedTest Water Temp: Not ReportedTest Chloride Content (MG/L): 2.4Test Drawdown Rate (ft): 1250Test Pump Rate (g/m): Not ReportedDate Tested: 0Chloride Content (mg/L): Not ReportedWater Level After Install: Not ReportedWater Level After Drilling: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5554368.2s Page A-12 0%0%100%-0.106 pCi/LBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%-0.112 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 43 Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 96720 : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for HAWAII County: 3 AREA RADON INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetlands Inventory Source: Office of Planning Telephone: 808-587-2895 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5554368.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Well Index Database Source: Commission on Water Resource Management Telephone: 808-587-0214 CWRM maintains a Well Index Database to track specific information pertaining to the construction and installation of production wells in Hawaii. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION RADON Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey TC5554368.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5554368.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED &HUWLILHG6DQERUQ0DS5HSRUW Inquiry Number: $UPVWURQJ5RDGWKIORRU 6KHOWRQ&7 7ROO)UHH ZZZHGUQHWFRP A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 February 05, 2019 5554368.3 &HUWLILHG6DQERUQ0DS5HSRUW &HUWLILHG6DQERUQ Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark 1otice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein arethe property of their respective owners. page The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results &RQWDFW ('5,QTXLU\ 6LWH1DPH &OLHQW1DPH &HUWLILFDWLRQ 32 3URMHFW 02/05/19 Not Reported A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC 905A Makahiki Way Hilo, HI 96720 5554368.3 HONOLULU, HI 96826 Maximiliano Ulloa The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 03EF-4CB9-861E NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY NA This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 03EF-4CB9-861E Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5554368 3 2 ('5+LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS5HSRUW Inquiry Number: $UPVWURQJ5RDGWKIORRU 6KHOWRQ&7 7ROO)UHH ZZZHGUQHWFRP ZLWK4XDG0DWFK A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 February 05, 2019 5554368.4 ('5+LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS5HSRUW ('5,QTXLU\ Search Results: 32 3URMHFW 0DSV3URYLGHG Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark 1otice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein arethe property of their respective owners. page &RRUGLQDWHV: /DWLWXGH /RQJLWXGH 870=RQH 870;0HWHUV 870<0HWHUV (OHYDWLRQ &RQWDFW 6LWH1DPH &OLHQW1DPH 2013 1995 1981 1980 1963 1932 1917 1914 02/05/19 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC Not Reported 905A Makahiki Way Hilo, HI 96720 HONOLULU, HI 96826 5554368.4 Maximiliano Ulloa EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. NA 19.71405 19° 42' 51" North NA -155.087087 -155° 5' 14" West Zone 5 North 281250.65 2181182.96 91.30' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5554368 4 2 page Topo Sheet .H\ This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 2013 Source Sheets Hilo 7.5-minute, 24000 1995 Source Sheets Hilo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1995 1981 Source Sheets Hilo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1977 1980 Source Sheets HILO 15-minute, 50000 5554368 4 3 page Topo Sheet .H\ This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. 1963 Source Sheets Hilo 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1961 1932 Source Sheets Hilo 15-minute, 62500 1917 Source Sheets Hilo 15-minute, 62500 1914 Source Sheets WAIAKEA 7.5-minute, 31680 5554368 4 4 +LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This Ueport includes information from the following map sheet(s). (: 6:66( 1:11( 2013 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC TP, Hilo, 2013, 7.5-minute 5554368 4 5 +LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This Ueport includes information from the following map sheet(s). (: 6:66( 1:11( 1995 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC TP, Hilo, 1995, 7.5-minute 5554368 4 6 +LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This Ueport includes information from the following map sheet(s). (: 6:66( 1:11( 1981 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC TP, Hilo, 1981, 7.5-minute 5554368 4 7 +LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This Ueport includes information from the following map sheet(s). (: 6:66( 1:11( 1980 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC TP, HILO, 1980, 15-minute 5554368 4 8 +LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This Ueport includes information from the following map sheet(s). (: 6:66( 1:11( 1963 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC TP, Hilo, 1963, 7.5-minute 5554368 4 9 +LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This Ueport includes information from the following map sheet(s). (: 6:66( 1:11( 1932 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC TP, Hilo, 1932, 15-minute 5554368 4 10 +LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This Ueport includes information from the following map sheet(s). (: 6:66( 1:11( 1917 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC TP, Hilo, 1917, 15-minute 5554368 4 11 +LVWRULFDO7RSR0DS page SITE NAME: ADDRESS: CLIENT: This Ueport includes information from the following map sheet(s). (: 6:66( 1:11( 1914 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC TP, WAIAKEA, 1914, 7.5-minute 5554368 4 12 7KH('5$HULDO3KRWR'HFDGH3DFNDJH A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: February 06, 2019 5554368.8 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com 2000 1"=500'Acquisition Date: June 16, 2000 USGS/DOQQ 1992 1"=500'Flight Date: September 30, 1992 USGS 1985 1"=500'Flight Date: March 11, 1985 USGS 1977 1"=500'Flight Date: January 03, 1977 USGS 1975 1"=500'Flight Date: July 17, 1975 USGS 1954 1"=500'Flight Date: April 10, 1954 USGS EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package 02/06/19 A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Site Name:Client Name: Environmental Risk Analysis. LLC Not Reported 905A Makahiki Way Hilo, HI 96720 HONOLULU, HI 96826 EDR Inquiry #5554368.8 Contact:Maximiliano Ulloa Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. Search Results: Year Scale Details Source When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 5554368 8-page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¶V ('5 &LW\'LUHFWRU\5HSRUWLVDVFUHHQLQJWRROGHVLJQHGWRDVVLVW HQYLURQPHQWDOSURIHVVLRQDOVLQHYDOXDWLQJSRWHQWLDOOLDELOLW\RQDWDUJHWSURSHUW\UHVXOWLQJIURPSDVWDFWLYLWLHV ('5¶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ity Directory Images - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 211 ANHOLT, WILLIAM J ASUNCION, EDWARD B CARRIAGA, ALEXANDER R KIM, YONG A KOBAYASHI, WADE M 222 GONO, NORA E 228 COVELL, MARK HANOA, JOLENE S IYO, RUSSELL M 233 KURUHARA, RAYMOND S 237 MIGUEL, FLOYD A 251 HAMASAKI CHALMERS K MD INC HAMASAKI, CHALMERS K 252 MATSUI, DEXTER Y 258 HY, BINH Q 272 MITSUDA, TOMMY 277 HEFFNER, MARCUS IDICA, RONALD A KANDA, KINUE N LOPEZ, VIOLET S QUIRIT, IGNACIO VILLAS, SUNSET 278 ALVAREZ, ARIEL KANEHAILUA, CHEYENNE MARTINS, MAYDEAN NAKAYAMA, IRIS Y OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, TEER, ROSS 282 KIYAN, EMMA LEE, DAISON OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, ORNONG, DOLORES O SMITH, ASHLEY D 287 FUKUMOTO, YOSHIE GOTA, FRANCIS M MANARPAAC, JINEANE MATSUI, CORA L SIMON, SUSAN 294 NERVEVA, CAITLIN OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, PHANG, PAUL C ROSE, JOHN TAKARA, DONNA 298 HOWARD, LOUIS R 299 TEXEIRA, MICHAEL J 300 KOREYASU, COLBY R 303 RABAGO, GEORGIANA N 312 ELITE CONTRACTING LLC PAO, KILILA K TOMINAGA, MICHAEL M (Cont'd) - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 315 GALINATO, WEYLAND D 316 MADRIAGA, GENERALISIMO B 320 ROMERO, CARTER L 322 KAHELE, PATRICK X NEVILLE, TIHANI OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, PEDRO, PATRICK P 326 CANION, JEFF R HESS, BRENT C KIHARA, ITSUKO N OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, VICENTE, SABRINA 328 KIHARA, BRADLEY K OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 332 CASTANEDA, BENITO E MIYAZAKI, KAMAN T OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 342 BEHLE, CHRISTIAN D 343 VELASQUEZ, DAVID L 349 GARCIA, EVELYN M PAIVA, RICHARD J 352 DONAHOE, MIKE B VINORAY, O R WILLOUGHBY, DONA 357 CORDEIRO, SANDY 365 CHAL, CHARLA 366 DOWNIE, SHAUN J 369 BARAJAS, LEHUA K GALARIO, LYNETTE UTA, WAYNE 370 NISHIMOTO, MYLES T 374 NISHIMOTO, HANAE 388 MCLEMORE, LISA SAKAMOTO, EDITH Y 391 EBANEZ, MARSHALL HUNG, ASHLEY M MAA, KENNETH 394 SMITH, LISA 405 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 408 IKAWA, DAVID S 412 CORREA, MICHELE OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, PAYAO, DEBRA 415 KIMURA, BEN H LOPEZ, HENSLEY K MIYASAKI, ERNEST M OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 418 PORZEL, LYNNE 421 GACULA, ALEX A GONZAGA, LETICIA S (Cont'd) - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 421 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 423 CACHO, GERALD P 429 PALIS, CATHERINE S 430 QUALIFIED PAINTING SERVICE 433 EBANEZ, R OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, POMROY, MOANI 440 CABRAL, LAURA CIRVELLO, PATRIC M DUMARAN, NATASHA OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 443 TAK, HELEN 444 FONSECA, LOIS KANASAKU, ALDEN Y KANESHIRO, HARVARD K MOORE, DAVID R TOKUUKE, JONI T 446 JARDINE, ADELE 451 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 452 GODOY, RENEE D 456 KAWAOKA, KIYOSHI OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 457 MATTOS, JUSTINA T 460 JARDINE, DOMINGA D 464 HAMASAKI, JOYCE E 466 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 474 MUNOZ, MIGUEL OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 484 CARVALHO, RACHAEL O 485 HOOTA, SHELBY K 490 BECKER, CATHERINE B 492 GOUVEIA, WALTER 499 WROBLESKI, RHEMA 516 HAYASHI, LILLIAN K - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 211 ANHOLT, WILLIAM J ASUNCION, EDWARD B FRANCIS, RAYRAY MURANAKA, WALLACE K SADO, MELGIE 222 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 228 IYO, RAYMOND H OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 237 UHLMANN, DAVID R 251 HAMASAKI CHALMERS K MD INC 252 MATSUI, VICTOIYA A 258 HY THAP A HY, THAP A 272 MITSUDA, GLENN J 277 BABAS, FERDINAND G KANDA, KENNETH S LAX, BOBBIE J LOPEZ, VIOLET S QUILAUSING, DANETTE M QUIRIT, IGNACIO 278 ABEYTA, KATE HANOHANO, EDWARD K KANEHAILUA, CHEYENNE KEANE, M RAHMAN, SYED TEER, ROSS 282 MEDEIROS, DENISE L NAKAYAMA, IRIS OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, ONO, HUGH Y 287 FUKUMOTO, YOSHIE GOTA, FRANCIS M GUERRERO, K KUOHA, IVY K LAX, BOBBIE J SUGAR SHANE ENTERPRISES LLC WITHEE, MARGARET 294 PHANG, PAUL C ROSE, JOHN WILLIAMS, FREDERICK A 298 HOWARD, LOUIS R 299 TEXEIRA, MICHAEL J 300 KOREYASU, COLBY R 303 RABAGO, GEORGIANA N 306 MADRIAGA, GENERALISIMO B 312 ELITE CONTRACTING LLC PAO, KILILA K TOMINAGA, ROBERT M 315 GALINATO WEYLAND M SR GALINATO, WEYLAND D (Cont'd) - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 316 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 320 ROMERO CARTER MASONRY ROMERO, CARTER L 326 KIHARA, ITSUKO N LOPEZ, JEANA M SEGAWA, CLYDE M 328 GARCIA, THOMAS KIHARA, KUMIO KIHARA, MORRIS I OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 332 ICHIN, DARA OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 343 VESPERAS, CHERYL 349 GARCIA, EVELYN M OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 352 DONAHOE, MIKE B 357 LAM MUI S OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 365 CHAI, CHARLA 366 DOWNIE, BEVERLY R 369 CARRON, VALERIE S NOBLE, SHANELLE E 370 NISHIMOTO, MYLES T 374 NISHIMOTO, HANAE 388 SAKAMOTO, EDITH Y 391 MAA, KENNETH OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, YASSO, MALIA K 404 VALENZUELA, NAOMI 405 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 408 IKAWA, DAVID S 412 KAMAU, BENSON K OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, PAYAO, RANDAL M 415 KIMURA, BEN H LOPEZ, HENSLEY K MAHI, DARNELL OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 418 DAMASCO, GERALDINE 421 GACULA, ALEX A GONZAGA, LETICIA S OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 423 CACHO, GERALD P 429 KOBAYASHI, SATOKO OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 430 QUALIFIED PAINTING SERVICE 433 EBANEZ, ROSS B 436 SOUZA, JONAH 440 GOMES, VALARIE KAHIKINA, KAHEA (Cont'd) - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 440 MARCIEL, ROBERT OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 443 HESS, R 444 DODO, MAX E KANESHIRO, SUSAN A KAWAOKA, KAZUO MOORE, DAVID R TOKUUKE, RALPH S 446 JARDINE, ADELE 451 KANNASS, MOUHAMED M 452 GODOY, RENEE D 456 KAWAOKA, KIYOSHI OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 457 MATTOS, JUSTINA T 460 JARDINE, DOMINGA D OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 464 BARKHOFF HARALD HAMASAKI, JOYCE E 466 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 474 ALAMEIDA, CHERMANE M ALANS ART & COLLECTIBLES OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 484 COCHRAN, MICHAEL H 485 HOOTA, DON J 490 JENSEN, ROBERT 492 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 499 WROBLESKI, RHEMA 516 HAYASHI, LILLIAN K - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A8 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 211 KOBAYASHI, WADE M UMAYAS, LYDIA YAMAMOTO, RODNEY K 228 IYO, RAYMOND 237 UHLMANN, DAVID R 251 HAMASAKI CHALMERS K MD INC HAMASAKI, CHALMERS K 252 MATSUI, DEXTER Y 258 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 272 MITSUDA, GLENN J 277 BABAS, FERDINAND G FUJIMOTO, ALAN E LAX, BOBBIE J QUIRIT, IGNACIO TAKABA, JAMIE 278 BASILIO, FRECIA HILLER, VIOLET 282 KUILIPULE, SHAINE 287 FUKUI, LORIANNE FUKUMOTO, YOSHIE GUERRERO, K HASHIRD, COLIN K KANEOKA, MASAYO NAGAO, CLIFFORD K 294 PETROWSKI, DEREK PHANG, PAUL C SCOTT, BETTY J WILLIAMS, HELEN P 298 HOWARD, LOUIS R 299 TEXEIRA, MICHAEL J 306 MADRIAGA, LILY K 312 BENSON, RICK J SERRAO, LLOYD L TOMINAGA, ROBERT M 315 GALINATO WEYLAND M SR GALINATO, AUDREY L 316 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 322 GRAVELA, TRACY A LEE, BRUCE J OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 326 FUJIOKA, JEANA M KIHARA, HITOSHI LOPEZ, JEANA M WEAVER, QUINN 328 JOHNSON, PENELOPE A KIHARA, KUMIO 332 MIYAZAKI, KAMAN T 342 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 349 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, PAIVA, ICHARD J (Cont'd) - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A9 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 352 THELEN, ALLISON 365 BIGTAS, JANICE L 369 JUVIK, JEENA NOBLE, SHANELLE E PRUDENCIO, CRYSTAL 391 MAA, KENNETH OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, TADIO, JAMES 394 UEMURA, ISAMU S 402 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 404 ANDRES, ALICIA JENNINGS, SCOTT J RITHER, CHRIS G 405 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 408 IKAWA, DAVID S 412 DAMASCO, GERALDINE R 415 KIMURA, BEN H MIYASAKI, ERNEST M OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, PAGAN, DESIREE A 421 GACULA, ALEX A OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 423 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 429 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 430 QUALIFIED PAINTING SERVICE 433 PARANADA, EDGAR A 436 SOUZA, JONAH 440 CASTILLAS, SHIRLEY A OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 443 LEHMAN, DEBRA L 444 DODO, MAX E KAWAOKA, KAZUO TOKUUKE, SHIGERU 446 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 451 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 456 KAWAOKA, KIYOSHI OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 457 MATTOS, JUSTINA T 460 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 464 HAMASAKI, JOYCE E MCCUNE WESTON EDWARD & JAN CH 466 CHARTRAND, N 474 ALANS ART & COLLECTIBLES OSHIMA, G M 484 COCHRAN, MICHAEL H 490 FRANKEL, MOLLY 492 BADUA, VERNA M 516 HAYASHI, LILLIAM K - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A10 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 211 KAWAHARA, C KOBAYASHI, WADE RIOS, FRANK YAMAMOTO, SHAWN M 228 IYO, RAYMOND 233 KURUHARA, ED S 237 MIGUEL, FLOYD A 251 HAMASAKI CHALMERS K MD INC OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 252 KANEMOTO, MASAO MATSUI, DEXTER Y 272 MITSUDA, TOMMY 277 BOYCE, D T LEBLANC, R A 278 CHANG, C K HILLER, V KIM, H A 282 GRILL, C JOHANNISSON, P H MONTIFALCON, FRANCES ONEILL, PEGGY B WOODWARD, ROBERT B 287 FUKUMOTO, YOSHIE HASHIRO, COLIN 294 WILLIAMS, H P 298 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 299 TEXEIRA, MICHAEL J 300 LUCAS, ALFRED 303 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 312 TOMINAGA, ROBERT 315 GALINATO, AUDREY 316 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 322 KIHARA, JOHN T 326 CALICDAN, COREY KIHARA, HITOSHI LAI, SEAN TANIMOTO, TAKAO YAMAMOTO, EARL N 328 ILER, DOUG KIHARA, K MACK, KELLIE A 342 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 349 PAIVA, GEORGE 352 LEE, JERRY 365 BIGTAS, JANICE L 366 DOWNIE, WILLIAM R 369 MCCARLEY, CLAUDE 388 SAKAMOTO, Y 394 UEMURA, ISAMU 402 SEBOROWSKI, FRANK (Cont'd) - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A11 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 404 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 405 MEREDITH, JULIA P 408 IKAWA, DAVID S 412 DAMASCO, G 415 PAGAN, DESIREE 421 GACULA, ALEX A 423 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 429 KOBAYASHI, SATOKO 430 CLYDE, I QUALIFIED PAINTING SERVICE 433 MATAS, GERRY PARANADA, EDGAR A 436 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 440 CASTILLAS, SHIRLEY 443 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 444 KAWAOKA, KAZUO TOKUUKE, PAUL M 451 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 456 KAWAOKA, KIYOSHI 457 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 458 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 460 JARDINE, DOMINGA D 464 MCCUNE, WESTON E 517 KOBAYASHI, AKIKO - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A12 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 211 ANDRADE, KAREN L CALIG, WILLIAM E KOBAYASHI, WADE NISHIURA, KELVIN Y REALPE, J REALPE, JOHN ROLLNY, ANDREAS SEWAKE, SANDRA M 222 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 228 IYO, RAYMOND 233 KURUHARA, ED S 237 MIGUEL, FLOYD A 252 KANEMOTO, MASAO MATSUI, TAMOTSU 258 FISH, WILLIAM S 272 MITSUDA, TOMMY 277 INAFUKU, PETE A LEBLANC, R A 278 HILLER, V KAMAU, BENSON K KIM, H A KOSHKO, C VICTORINO, JOY 282 KOKUBUN, JOHN S NAKAYAMA, Y 287 FUKUMOTO, YOSHIE 294 HEINZ, DEBRA KANESHIRO, GLADYS PINCHAK, K WILLIAMS, H P 298 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 299 TEXEIRA, MICHAEL J 303 RABAGO, SAMUEL F 306 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 311 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 312 SAKAGUCHI, ERIC SAKAI, KIMIKO TOMINAGA, ROBERT 315 GALINATO, AUDREY 316 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 322 IGNACIO, JAY M 326 KIHARA, HITOSHI LAI, SEAN MCDONOUGH, SHARON MIYASAKI, ARNOLD I PHILLIPS, C TANIMOTO, TAKAO 328 AYALA, WILLIAM J KAAUAMO, B KIHARA, KUMIO (Cont'd) - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A13 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 328 VALDEZ, M 342 LEWIS, KENNETH E 349 DOBASHI, ROBERT 352 LEE, JERRY 357 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 366 DOWNIE, WILLIAM R 388 SAKAMOTO, Y 394 UEMURA, ISAMU 402 SEBOROWSKI, FRANK TUCKER, KENDALL G 404 PAYAO, DEBRA D 405 SNAP ON TOOLS DEALER WILSON, RICHARD 408 IKAWA, DAVID S 412 DAMASCO, BERNARD 415 FUJITA, LLOYD E 421 GACULA, ALEX A 423 CAGAT, BETTY P 430 IMAIZUMI, M QUALIFIED PAINTING SERVICE 433 LEOPOLDINO, ROXANNE L PARANADA, EDGAR A 436 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 440 CASTILLAS, SHIRLEY 443 SHON, LARRY L 444 DODO, JASMINE KAWAOKA, KAZUO TOKUUKE, PAUL M 446 JARDINE, ADELE 451 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 456 KAWAOKA, KIYOSHI 458 YEH, BARBARA S 460 JARDINE, DOMINGA D 464 WILLIAMS, BOB 466 KODANI, ASAWO 474 MCCUNE, WESTON 484 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 486 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 490 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 492 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 506 KOBATAKE, MASATO - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A14 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 211 REALPE, J SIMAO, WILLIAM TORRES, RAYMOND II 228 IYO, RAYMOND 233 KURUHARA, ED S 237 MIGUEL, FLOYD A 252 KANEMOTO, MASAO MATSUI, TAMOTSU 258 FISH, WILLIAM S 272 MITSUDA, TOMMY 278 GABRIELLA, SARKA HILLER, V KIM, H A WONG, NELSON 282 AFALAVA, ALDEN CHRISTIANSEN, MICHAEL L GABONIA, RONALD J HANASHIRO, CLYDE NAKAYAMA, Y 294 LAZAROW, ARLINE WILLIAMS, H P 299 TEXEIRA, MICHAEL J 311 PERRY, LARRY 312 SAKAGUCHI, ERIC SAKAI, KIMIKO TOMINAGA, ROBERT 315 GALINATO, AUDREY 322 CASTRO, WENDELL R IGNACIO, JAY M JOSEPH, MICHAEL G 326 KIHARA, HITOSHI MIYASAKI, ARNOLD I TANIMOTO, TAKAO YOUNG, CLYDE 328 AYALA, WILLIAM J INABA, JASON KIHARA, KUMIO 349 DOBASHI, ROBERT 352 LEE, JERRY 366 DOWNIE, WILLIAM R 388 SAKAMOTO, Y 394 UEMURA, ISAMU 402 SEBOROWSKI, FRANK 405 WILSON, RICHARD 408 IKAWA, DAVID S 412 DAMASCO, BERNARD 421 GACULA, ALEX A 423 CACHO, GERMAN 430 IMAIZUMI, M QUALIFIED PAINTING SERVICE (Cont'd) - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A15 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 433 KOIDE, GEORGE PARANADA, EDGAR A 436 ESCRITOR, THOMAS 440 CASTILLAS, SHIRLEY 443 SHON, LARRY L 444 KAWAOKA, KAZUO TOKUUKE, PAUL M 446 JARDINE, ADELE 451 MULVIHILL, JOSEPH 456 KAWAOKA, KIYOSHI 466 KODANI, ASAWO 474 JARDIN, V 490 DUPUIS, C 506 KOBATAKE, MASATO - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A16 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1987 55 HATADA BAKERY INC 352 LEE CONSTRUCTION INC 430 QUALIFIED PAINTING SERVICE* - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A17 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1982 55 HATADA BAKERY INC 138 FANTASIA PACIFIC INC 228 IYO DRY GOODS 278 LIMITED HOME IMPROVEMENT CONTR 352 LEE CONSTRUCTION INC 430 QUALIFIED PAINTING SERVICE 596 MIYAMURA TAKEYUKI CONTRACTOR - KUKUAU ST EDR Digital Archive 5554368.5 Page: A18 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1977 55 HATADA BAKERY INC 138 FANTASIA PACIFIC INC 228 IYO DRY GOODS 278 LIMITED HOME IMPROVEMENT CONTR 539 MENEHUNE MAINTENANCE INC 596 MIYAMURA TAKEYUKI CONTRACTOR neercS tnemhcaorcnE ropaV RDE teehskroW tnemhcaorcnE ropaV s’RDE gnisu deraperP 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com A0705 Hilo Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Not Reported Hilo, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 5554368.2s February 12, 2019 Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Primary Map 2 Secondary Map 3 Map Findings 4 Record Sources and Currency GR-1 Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice The EDR Vapor Encroachment Worksheet enables EDR's customers to make certain online modifications that effects maps, text and calculations contained in this Report. As a result, maps, text and calculations contained in this Report may have been so modified. EDR has not taken any action to verify any such modifications, and this report and the findings set forth herein must be read in light of this fact. Environmental Data Resources shall not be responsible for any customer's decision to include or not include in any final report any records determined to be within the relevant minimum search distances. This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANYSUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can produce information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2019 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS TC Page 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by EDR. The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of the ASTM Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Encroachment into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions (E 2600). STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Default Area of Concern (Miles)*property1/10> 1/10Federal NPL site list 1.0 0 0 0 Federal Delisted NPL site list 1.0 0 0 0 Federal CERCLIS list 0.5 0 0 0 Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0.5 0 0 0 Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 1.0 0 0 0 Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0.5 0 0 0 Federal RCRA generators list 0.25 0 0 0 Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0.5 0 0 0 Federal ERNS list 0.001 0 0 - State- and tribal - equivalent NPL not searched --- State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 1.0 0 0 0 State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0.5 0 0 0 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 0.5 0 0 1 State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0.25 0 0 1 State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries 0.5 0 0 0 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0.5 0 0 0 State and tribal Brownfields sites 0.5 0 0 0 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0.5 0 0 0 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0.5 0 0 0 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0.001 0 0 - Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks not searched --- Local Land Records 0.001 0 0 - Records of Emergency Release Reports 0.001 0 0 - Other Ascertainable Records 1.0 0 0 1 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 1.0 0 0 0 Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0.001 0 0 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 *The Default Area of Concern may be adjusted by the environmental professional using experience and professional judgement. Each category may include several databases, and each database may have a different distance. A list of individual databases is provided at the back of this report. EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES EDR Exclusive Records 1.0 0 0 0 Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0.001 0 0 - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS A0705 HILO KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI NOT REPORTED HILO, HI 96720 COORDINATES Latitude (North):19.71405 - 19° 42ʹ 50.581055ʺ Longitude (West):155.087087 - 155° 5ʹ 13.494873ʺ Elevation:91 ft. above sea level EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 8 8 SEARCH RESULTS Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page HALAI HILL RADIO STATION END OF ULILI ST, OFF HINA ST S HILO 1/10 - 1/3 S ▲ 1 UST: UST Financial Assurance: Financial Assurance LUST: LUST Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page HALAI HILL RADIO STATION END OF ULILI ST, OFF HINA ST S HILO 1/10 - 1/3 S ▲ 1 UST: UST Financial Assurance: Financial Assurance LUST: LUST Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page Not Reported Name Address Dist/Dir Map ID Page Not Reported EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 . BeginOC−start−Wetlands−BeginOC−startBeginOC−start−− State Wetlands−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− State WetlandsBeginOC−start−− National Wetlands Inventory−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− National Wetlands InventoryBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−WetlandsBeginOC−start−Water−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−WaterBeginOC−start−Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas Pipelines−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas PipelinesBeginOC−start−Flood Zones−BeginOC−startBeginOC−start−− 500 Year Zone−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− 500 Year ZoneBeginOC−start−− 100 Year Zone−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− 100 Year ZoneBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Flood ZonesBeginOC−start−Streets−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−StreetsBeginOC−start−Railroads−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−RailroadsBeginOC−start−Target Property Location−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Target Property LocationBeginOC−start−Federal DOD Records−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Federal DOD RecordsBeginOC−start−Indian Reservations BIA−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Indian Reservations BIABeginOC−start−National Priority List Records−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−National Priority List RecordsBeginOC−start−Search Rings−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Search Rings 1 . BeginOC−start−Wetlands−BeginOC−startBeginOC−start−− State Wetlands−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− State WetlandsBeginOC−start−− National Wetlands Inventory−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− National Wetlands InventoryBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−WetlandsBeginOC−start−Water−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−WaterBeginOC−start−Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas Pipelines−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Power Transmission Lines / Oil & Gas PipelinesBeginOC−start−Flood Zones−BeginOC−startBeginOC−start−− 500 Year Zone−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− 500 Year ZoneBeginOC−start−− 100 Year Zone−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−− 100 Year ZoneBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Flood ZonesBeginOC−start−Streets−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−StreetsBeginOC−start−Railroads−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−RailroadsBeginOC−start−Contour Lines−BeginOC−start BeginOC−start−Contour Lines−OffBeginOC−start 2001 0 0 BeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Contour LinesBeginOC−start−Target Property Location−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Target Property LocationBeginOC−start−Federal DOD Records−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Federal DOD RecordsBeginOC−start−Indian Reservations BIA−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Indian Reservations BIABeginOC−start−National Priority List Records−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−National Priority List RecordsBeginOC−start−Search Rings−BeginOC−startBeginOC−end−BeginOC−end−Search Rings 1 LEGEND DATABASE ACRONYM: Applicable categories (A hoverbox with database description). FACILITY NAME FACILITY ADDRESS, CITY, ST, ZIP EDR SITE ID NUMBER ◆ MAP ID# Direction Distance Range (Distance feet / miles) Relative Elevation Feet Above Sea Level ASTM 2600 Record Sources found in this report. Each database searched has been assigned to one or more categories. For detailed information about categorization, see the section of the report Records Searched and Currency. Worksheet: Comments: Comments may be added on the online Vapor Encroachment Worksheet. HALAI HILL RADIO STATION END OF ULILI ST, OFF HINA ST S HILO, HILO, HI, 96720 U003541909 ▲ 1 S 1/10 - 1/3 (1308 ft. / 0.248 mi.) 30 ft. Higher Elevation 121 ft. Above Sea Level State and tribal leaking storage tank lists State and tribal registered storage tank lists Other Ascertainable Records Worksheet: LUST: State and tribal leaking storage tank lists Facility ID:9-600561 Facility Status:Site Cleanup Completed (NFA) Facility Status Date:08/23/1999 Release ID:990152 Project Officer:Jeffrey Ung UST: State and tribal registered storage tank lists Facility ID:9-600561 Owner:Hawaiian Telcom Owner Address:1177 Bishop Street, Suite 20 Owner City,St,Zip:Hilo, 96720 96720 Latitude:19.709730 Longitude:-155.086850 Horizontal Reference Datum Name:NAD83 Horizontal Collection Method Name:GPS Tank ID:M-2 Date Installed:10/01/1998 Tank Status:Currently in Use Date Closed:Not Reported Tank Capacity:600 Substance:Other Tank ID:R-1 MAP FINDINGS TC Page 8 HALAI HILL RADIO STATION, END OF ULILI ST, OFF HINA ST S HILO, HILO, HI 96720 (Continued) Date Installed:05/07/1982 Tank Status:Permanently Out of Use Date Closed:10/26/1998 Tank Capacity:280 Substance:Gasoline HI Financial Assurance: Other Ascertainable Records Alt Facility ID:9-600561 Tank Id:R-1 Tank Status:Permanently Out of Use FRTYPE:Risk Retention Group Expiration Date:Not Reported Alt Facility ID:9-600561 Tank Id:M-2 Tank Status:Currently in Use FRTYPE:Risk Retention Group Expiration Date:Not Reported Alt Facility ID:9-600561 Tank Id:M-2 Tank Status:Currently in Use FRTYPE:Insurance Expiration Date:05/02/2010 Alt Facility ID:9-600561 Tank Id:R-1 Tank Status:Permanently Out of Use FRTYPE:Insurance Expiration Date:05/02/2010 Alt Facility ID:9-600561 Tank Id:R-1 Tank Status:Permanently Out of Use FRTYPE:Insurance Expiration Date:05/02/2015 Alt Facility ID:9-600561 Tank Id:M-2 Tank Status:Currently in Use FRTYPE:Insurance Expiration Date:05/02/2015 MAP FINDINGS TC Page 9 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDSFederal NPL site listUS NPL National Priority ListEPA12/12/2018 12/28/2018 01/11/2019US Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites EPA12/12/2018 12/28/2018 01/11/2019US NPL LIENS Federal Superfund LiensEPA10/15/1991 02/02/1994 03/30/1994Federal CERCLIS listUS SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System EPA12/12/2018 12/28/2018 01/11/2019Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities listUS CORRACTS Corrective Action ReportEPA03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018Federal RCRA TSD facilities listUS RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018Federal RCRA generators listUS RCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registriesUS LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Department of the Navy 10/17/2018 10/25/2018 12/07/2018US US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites ListEnvironmental Protection Agency 07/31/2018 08/28/2018 09/14/2018US US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional ControlsEnvironmental Protection Agency 07/31/2018 08/28/2018 09/14/2018Federal ERNS listUS ERNS Emergency Response Notification System National Response Center, United States Coast 09/24/2018 09/25/2018 11/09/2018State and tribal - equivalent CERCLISHI SHWS Sites ListDepartment of Health 09/27/2018 11/19/2018 12/04/2018State and tribal landfill / solid waste disposalHI SWF/LF Permitted Landfills in the State of Hawaii Department of Health 09/17/2012 04/03/2013 05/10/2013State and tribal leaking storage tank listsHI LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Department of Health 08/31/2018 09/11/2018 10/10/2018US INDIAN LUST R8 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 804/25/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R7 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 704/24/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R6 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 604/01/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R4 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 405/08/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R1 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 104/13/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R10 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1004/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R5 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 504/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN LUST R9 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Environmental Protection Agency 04/10/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018TC5554368.2s Page GR-1GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date State and tribal registered storage tank listsHI UST Underground Storage Tank Database Department of Health 08/31/2018 09/11/2018 10/10/2018US INDIAN UST R5 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 504/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R4 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 405/08/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R6 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 604/01/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R7 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 704/24/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R8 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 804/25/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R9 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 904/10/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R1 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA, Region 104/13/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US INDIAN UST R10 Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land EPA Region 1004/12/2018 05/18/2018 07/20/2018US FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing FEMA05/15/2017 05/30/2017 10/13/2017State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registriesHI ENG CONTROLS Engineering Control SitesDepartment of Health 09/27/2018 11/19/2018 12/04/2018HI INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional ControlsDepartment of Health 09/27/2018 11/19/2018 12/04/2018State and tribal voluntary cleanup sitesUS INDIAN VCP R7 Voluntary Cleanup Priority LisitngEPA, Region 703/20/2008 04/22/2008 05/19/2008US INDIAN VCP R1 Voluntary Cleanup Priority ListingEPA, Region 107/27/2015 09/29/2015 02/18/2016HI VCP Voluntary Response Program Sites Department of Health 09/27/2018 11/19/2018 12/04/2018State and tribal Brownfields sitesHI BROWNFIELDS Brownfields SitesDepartment of Health 09/27/2018 11/19/2018 12/04/2018Other RecordsUS CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library 09/30/2018 10/12/2018 12/07/2018US ROD Records Of DecisionEPA12/12/2018 12/28/2018 01/11/2019US LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien InformationEnvironmental Protection Agency 12/12/2018 12/28/2018 01/11/2019US DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations EPA, Region 901/12/2009 05/07/2009 09/21/2009US LEAD SMELTER 2 Lead Smelter SitesAmerican Journal of Public Health 04/05/2001 10/27/2010 12/02/2010US LEAD SMELTER 1 Lead Smelter SitesEnvironmental Protection Agency 12/12/2018 12/28/2018 01/11/2019US 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List Environmental Protection Agency 09/30/2017 05/08/2018 07/20/2018US PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database Environmental Protection Agency 05/24/2017 11/30/2017 12/15/2017US FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Department of Energy 08/08/2017 09/11/2018 09/14/2018US EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LISTEnvironmental Protection Agency 08/30/2013 03/21/2014 06/17/2014US US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance InformationEnvironmental Protection Agency 08/31/2018 09/25/2018 11/09/2018US US AIRS MINOR Air Facility System DataEPA10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US US AIRS (AFS) Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem ( EPA10/12/2016 10/26/2016 02/03/2017US COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data Department of Energy 12/31/2005 08/07/2009 10/22/2009US COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List Environmental Protection Agency 07/01/2014 09/10/2014 10/20/2014US SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing Environmental Protection Agency 01/01/2017 02/03/2017 04/07/2017US US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Drug Enforcement Administration 09/21/2018 09/21/2018 11/09/2018US Delisted NPL National Priority List DeletionsEPA12/12/2018 12/28/2018 01/11/2019US SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive EPA12/13/2018 12/28/2018 01/11/2019US RCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated Environmental Protection Agency 03/01/2018 03/28/2018 06/22/2018US HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System U.S. Department of Transportation 03/26/2018 03/27/2018 06/08/2018TC5554368.2s Page GR-2GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date US DOT OPS Incident and Accident DataDepartment of Transporation, Office of Pipeli 10/01/2018 10/30/2018 01/18/2019US US CDL Clandestine Drug LabsDrug Enforcement Administration 09/21/2018 09/21/2018 11/09/2018US US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields SitesEnvironmental Protection Agency 12/17/2018 12/18/2018 01/11/2019US DOD Department of Defense SitesUSGS12/31/2005 11/10/2006 01/11/2007US FEDLAND Federal and Indian LandsU.S. Geological Survey 12/31/2005 02/06/2006 01/11/2007US FUDS Formerly Used Defense SitesU.S. Army Corps of Engineers 01/31/2015 07/08/2015 10/13/2015US UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings SitesDepartment of Energy 06/23/2017 10/11/2017 11/03/2017US ODI Open Dump InventoryEnvironmental Protection Agency 06/30/1985 08/09/2004 09/17/2004US US MINES Mines Master Index FileDepartment of Labor, Mine Safety and Health A 08/01/2018 08/29/2018 10/05/2018US US MINES 2 Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing USGS12/05/2005 02/29/2008 04/18/2008US US MINES 3 Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing USGS04/14/2011 06/08/2011 09/13/2011US PRP Potentially Responsible PartiesEPA08/13/2018 10/04/2018 11/09/2018US TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System EPA12/31/2016 01/10/2018 01/12/2018US TSCA Toxic Substances Control ActEPA12/31/2016 06/21/2017 01/05/2018US FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxi 04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US FTTS INSP FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fu EPA04/09/2009 04/16/2009 05/11/2009US HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US HIST FTTS INSP FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Lis Environmental Protection Agency 10/19/2006 03/01/2007 04/10/2007US SSTS Section 7 Tracking SystemsEPA12/31/2009 12/10/2010 02/25/2011US ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System Environmental Protection Agency 11/18/2016 11/23/2016 02/10/2017US PADS PCB Activity Database SystemEPA09/14/2018 10/11/2018 12/07/2018US MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System Nuclear Regulatory Commission 08/30/2016 09/08/2016 10/21/2016US RADINFO Radiation Information DatabaseEnvironmental Protection Agency 10/02/2018 10/03/2018 11/09/2018US FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System EPA11/15/2018 12/05/2018 01/11/2019US RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System EPA04/17/1995 07/03/1995 08/07/1995US RMP Risk Management PlansEnvironmental Protection Agency 10/26/2018 11/06/2018 01/11/2019US BRS Biennial Reporting SystemEPA/NTIS12/31/2015 02/22/2017 09/28/2017US PWS Public Water System DataEPA12/17/2013 01/09/2014 10/15/2014US INDIAN RESERV Indian ReservationsUSGS12/31/2014 07/14/2015 01/10/2017US INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Environmental Protection Agency 12/31/1998 12/03/2007 01/24/2008HI AIRS List of Permitted FacilitiesDepartment of Health 12/31/2018 01/04/2019 01/25/2019HI CDL Clandestine Drug Lab ListingDepartment of Health 08/04/2010 09/10/2010 10/22/2010HI DRYCLEANERS Permitted Drycleaner Facility Listing Department of Health 12/31/2018 01/04/2019 01/25/2019HI Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing Department of Health 12/21/2018 12/26/2018 01/25/2019HI LEAD Lead Inspection ListingDepartment of Health 12/07/2018 12/11/2018 01/25/2019HI SPILLS Release NotificationsDepartment of Health 08/14/2018 08/21/2018 09/11/2018HI SPILLS 90 SPILLS90 data from FirstSearchFirstSearch03/10/2012 01/03/2013 02/11/2013HI UIC Underground Injection Wells Listing Department of Health 02/07/2013 02/12/2013 04/09/2013US IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian LandDepartment of Health & Human Serivces, Indian 04/01/2014 08/06/2014 01/29/2015US UXO Unexploded Ordnance SitesDepartment of Defense 09/30/2017 06/19/2018 09/14/2018US DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing Environmental Protection Agency 05/31/2018 07/26/2018 10/05/2018US ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information Environmental Protection Agency 09/02/2018 09/05/2018 09/14/2018US ABANDONED MINES Abandoned MinesDepartment of Interior 09/10/2018 09/11/2018 09/14/2018US FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing EPA08/22/2018 08/22/2018 10/05/2018TC5554368.2s Page GR-3GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date HISTORICAL USE RECORDSUS EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historical Auto Stations EDR, Inc.US EDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historical Cleaners EDR, Inc.HI RGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilitie Department of Health07/01/2013 01/08/2014HI RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List Department of Health07/01/2013 01/17/2014HI RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tan Department of Health07/01/2013 01/03/2014STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.TC5554368.2s Page GR−4GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKINGSt Acronym Full NameGovernment Agency Gov Date Arvl. Date Active Date Appendix D BUREAU OF CONVEYANCE DOCUMENTATION ( DI 48 OC. & URCE: ITLE 2s49 TSA/8ly TAEA 4 NO ROUN'ESLIP Akane A Riche rd gon Tr Est 362,493 08 New (Kinoole Development Co Ltd)-le e/12/5 2425-3 ditto 62,493.6 20. ee re awers 36 side /19/63 e g dmsnt of Drust: Gecrge G_] Rio Juldus C g rundchildrrep Doa 300207 l1/19/62 12/10/62 < Amend _of agrmte eto (UE ONLY 25 I o0 owha ss George do do o o Tust CoLtd, Truetee 0v bx 0 300208 629 11/27/6212/1o/62. c Bettlor terminate & cancel KGYED ONLY 3 (220434 2/19/62 do do tion of Trustt Robert M RLohardson,lx ttlor, Co Ltd, Trustee 300 209 0-2262911/9/6212/10/62 Sqttlog terminate KEYED GRANTEE FINAL DATA AS SHOWN ON TAX XMAPEL OC. & RCE: TLE: 1205 LCAp EED, ETC.: DATE TMB NO DATE GRANTEE CTC AREA OF PARCEL PAGE GRANTOR. ETC Akomn A Richerdson Trust Estate of Trusta Rioherdsom noole Development To Co Ltd, Trustee Settler terminate & cancel trust, eto, ato) 2/9/63 do do nstion Thomes Guand Co Itde on 12/o/2 132 Z Sattler terminate & canseltrnsteat O! 4369' (229 RYT/pl 11/20/64 O 1/4 Robert M Richardson do tduTrustee under will 1/4 Juliug C Biclardson r Seorgg G Rlchard son 345312 Cons: Ta tion 1/4-T/C ThomgsGuard 14 ,(Kinoole Development Co.Ltd)le LB/yc 1/9767 7vc i9767 TMB 100'67 oped into Rd, 257.424 do 2425-48 Bor (51 or Robert M Richardson etal To: County of Haw i $1. 11 Doc 408559C-112158 Cons 5-48; Areg & bdry NOTE: LAST AREA Q GRANTEE FINAL DATA AS SHOWN ON TAX MAPS, TAX MAPS BRANCH HISTORY SHEET 19767 DIV DA PLAT PAR LOCATION: Naiakea TITLE: ICA 1205 2 4 251 48 PAGE 3 NO GRANTOR, ETC, AREA OF PARCEL GRANTEE. 10 TMD 4393*67 (2209-1 etc] 10/18/67 LD CT ORD 276131 C-100190 10/4/67 _Robext_M_R4chards on 19/11/67 Death of Gegrge GRichaideon ulu chard son Ir on 12/26/65 _.IhomasR Guard 0 _Richa evelopment Co. TMB 1952'68 O D s First National Succ/Ir To hz do Tos Fay I Linger ey I Linger Und 1/4int in Doc 438885 Richar liusCRic t Encumb radc 88 Irust hom le Dey c 12 TMB 759'69 (2209-] f U Amd L: Robert M Richardson eta setal To: Kinog Doc 464926 Ltq C-1001908 ry renta1 shall be reduced KEYED ONLY NOTE: INFORMATION ON THIS 8HEET 8 SUBJECT TO CHANGE OIV TAX MAPS BRANCH HISTORY SHEET FLAT PAR T PLAT PAR DATE: South Hilo 48 LOCATION: Lot 9. LCA 1 op 1205 TITLE: no. PAGE GRANTEE .CTC AREA o PARCEL GRANTOR, TC. Robert M Richardson Trust.-] Robert M Richardson to: First Hawn No Chenge Qther Owners & Ints nk, Trustee Doc 86623 C-186313SCTS 00 76 Undint in No Change Suble & Sub- -suble /22/7'6 10/22/76 Und 1/4 int in 2209-1 eto) 2209-1 etc) 1/4 Thomas R Guard Estate R S: Est of Thomas Richardson Guard, dec'd do Z Ints - 'oChangef /1/77 Other Owne robate No,38808, 1st Cir (te, Suble & Sub-suble --NoChang Info _per InventoryList fr I,T,U, 418 TK 2209. do do e Richardson im Dover Int: Suzanne o, First Havn Bank, Sucr Tr Doc 829 D ONL 100190 2209-] % ust Co Id -]/ mTx Co do o iian Pers Rep of Est of Haw Other Omers: 8808 gogas R Gu rd; deg'd Probate No, Robert M Richardson Trust-1/4 $00 Cir Dog 871513 c Julius C Richardson Trust -1/4 /78 (TK 220 Tay I Lins ger -1/4 1/4 ey I Ling ger -] ,(Ie,Suble & Sub-suble- -No Change garwe do First Tawn Bank, O inger ay I Joh Stratte TrusTe hawn Ir Co a I Ranches Inc 880- Sea Gifts Corporation -T7C or about 12/31/77 ted exn1 209- -1 etc NOTE: INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET I8 SUBJECT TO 'CHANGE DIv. TAX MAPS BRANCH HISTORY SHEET DIV DATE: PLAT PART PLAT PAR LOCATION: South ylo TITLE TITLE: NO QRANTOR, ITC AREA OF PARCEL GRANTLE. SiegfredS Kagaua etal s Und Doc 491 S/ T$00 5/15480 ) RanchesInc Ind 101438 z 4/29480542848 09 on ) 10 enl 19 D: Sea Gifts Cor? Doc 1034227 C-228023 do Auto Imports of Hawaii, Inc SCT$0 9/29/80 10/1/80 (7K 22095 ] etc) 40% OTHE OWNERS & INT NO CHANGE 20 TMB 18029 80 WK 32,377 6 do D: (25,0476, Lot 9-I- -)dropped into new # arcel 2425-93 F/D: Area bdry o 21 1 3327'81 GS/mm 4/23/8 306,755 D: 25,62283. drop dropped into2425-52(new F/D: Area & bdry 22 TMB 3707 '81 GS/nm 4/2378 do dropnped nto 2425-54(new) /D: Area & tdr NOTE: NFORMATION ON THIS SHEET SUNJECT TO CHANGE # f DIV TAX MAPS BRANCH HISTORY SHEET PLAT PAR DATE: 48 South Hilo 2 LOCATION: 1205 Lot 9- -L-5 etc LCA TITLE: GAANTEE. CrC AREA OF PARCEL NO. Page 6 GRANTOR, CTC o Imports of Hawaii, Inc _156,618 4 Auto I 14968'81 _G/mm 10/16/81 2404, Lot 9- L-10) drpd into .2425-49 40% 20% Ltd JT Trading Co 20% Farms & Ranches Inc. 1979, Lot 9-L-6)drpd into 2425-53 6% Siegfred S Kagawa /D: Area & bdry; Lot 9 -L-12 0 5% Inc Kasons z 3% Gek, Corp. 3% Henlin, Corp 0 3% Inc Katco 1 Siggfred S Ka ; Toi andsaf Kuukua ra etal Doc 1142022 73782 C-244554 SCT$0 11 /3/82 -1 etc) To: John Stratton Tolmie Jr &wf 5 D: Doc 1464982 C-296784 SCT$0 5 '12/87 Linda Ann 1/ Linda Ann T/E 5721787 TK 2425-48, 80 I NOTE: INFORMATION ON THIS SHEET 18 SUBJECT TO CHANGE ( ' 3 TAX MAPS BRANCH HiSTORY SHEET DIV PAR DATE: PLAT LOCATION: South_ Hilo 2 4 25 53 1205 Lot 9- -L-6 9 LCA Ma TITLE No NO RANTOR. ETC GRANTe ETC AREA oF PARCEL '81 GN/mm _10/16/81 26,197 g To: Auto Imports of Hawal1, Inc 2425-48(23) 26,1979, 40% 20% JT Trading Co ., Ltd ew 20% Farms & Ranches,I Inc 6% SiegfredS Kagawa 5% Kasons,_ Inc. 3% Gek, Corp, ICo 3% Henlin, Cotp 0: Q1 3% ,KateoInc, Hiroshi Kitsutani To: Q92388 C-236771 SCT: $16.25 do 1/81 11/2/31 To: Hiroshi Kitsutanf &wf 3 D: Doc 1189805 C:252267 SCT$0 do Du T/E Setsuko P 30/83 9/6/83 To:Kitsutani Famfly 4D: Doc1328034 C-276058 SCT$0 10) 3785 do rust 10/11/85 8 3 NOTE: INFORMATION ON THIS 3HEET I &UBJECT TO CHANGE ; . F Appendix E INTERVIEW DOCUMENTATION Appendix F HAWAII ELECTRIC LIGHT COMPANY TRANSFORMER DOCUMENTATION Appendix F SITE RECONNAISSANCE PHOTOGRAPHS TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080, Hilo, Hawaii, HI, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Photograph #1 Description of Photograph: Parcel 053 from Kapiolani Street Photograph #2 Description of Photograph: Across Kapiolani Street is the Hawaii Public Safety Building. Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Page 1 TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080, Hilo, Hawaii, HI, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Photograph #3 Description of Photograph: Adjacent residential structures along the northern border of parcel 048. Photograph #4 Description of Photograph: Some of the transformers observed near the Site. Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Page 2 TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080, Hilo, Hawaii, HI, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Photograph #5 Description of Photograph: Other residential structures located along the northwestern boundary of parcel 048. Photograph #6 Description of Photograph: Inside parcel 053 near the northwestern corner looking toward the center of the parcel. Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Page 3 TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080, Hilo, Hawaii, HI, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Photograph #7 Description of Photograph: Inside parcel 053 near the southeastern corner looking toward the center of the parcel. Photograph #8 Description of Photograph: Hualalai Street: entrance to the residential structures along the southern edge of the Site (near parcel 080). Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Page 4 TMK (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 & 080, Hilo, Hawaii, HI, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Photograph #9 Description of Photograph: Structures across Kukuau Street in the northern edge of the Site. Photograph #10 Description of Photograph: Low laying grass in the center of the Site (Parcel 53) Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Photograph Date: February 10, 2019 Page 5 Exhibit 7: Endangered Species Endangered Species Act (CEST and EA) General requirements ESA Legislation Regulations Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) mandates that federal agencies ensure that actions that they authorize, fund, or carry out shall not jeopardize the continued existence of federally listed plants and animals or result in the adverse modification or destruction of designated critical habitat. Where their actions may affect resources protected by the ESA, agencies must consult with the Fish and Wildlife Service and/or the National Marine Fisheries Service (“FWS” and “NMFS” or “the Services”). The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.); particularly section 7 (16 USC 1536). 50 CFR Part 402 References https://www.hudexchange.info/environmental-review/endangered-species 1. Does the project involve any activities that have the potential to affect species or habitats? No, the project will have No Effect due to the nature of the activities involved in the project. à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. No, the project will have No Effect based on a letter of understanding, memorandum of agreement, programmatic agreement, or checklist provided by local HUD office. Explain your determination: à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. Yes, the activities involved in the project have the potential to affect species and/or habitats. à Continue to Question 2. 2. Are federally listed species or designated critical habitats present in the action area? Obtain a list of protected species from the Services. This information is available on the FWS Website or you may contact your local FWS and/or NMFS offices directly. No, the project will have No Effect due to the absence of federally listed species and designated critical habitat. à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. Documentation may include letters from the Services, species lists from the Services’ websites, surveys or other documents and analysis showing that there are no species in the action area. Yes, there are federally listed species or designated critical habitats present in the action area. à Continue to Question 3. 3. What effects, if any, will your project have on federally listed species or designated critical habitat? No Effect: Based on the specifics of both the project and any federally listed species in the action area, you have determined that the project will have absolutely no effect on listed species or critical habitat. à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide any documents used to make your determination. Documentation should include a species list and explanation of your conclusion, and may require maps, photographs, and surveys as appropriate. May Affect, Not Likely to Adversely Affect: Any effects that the project may have on federally listed species or critical habitats would be beneficial, discountable, or insignificant. à Continue to Question 4, Informal Consultation. Likely to Adversely Affect: The project may have negative effects on one or more listed species or critical habitat. à Continue to Question 5, Formal Consultation. 4. Informal Consultation is required Section 7 of ESA (16 USC. 1536) mandates consultation to resolve potential impacts to endangered and threatened species and critical habitats. If a HUD-assisted project may affect any federally listed endangered or threatened species or critical habitat, then compliance is required with Section 7. See 50 CFR Part 402 Subpart B Consultation Procedures. Did the Service(s) concur with the finding that the project is Not Likely to Adversely Affect? Yes, the Service(s) concurred with the finding. à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to Question 6 and provide the following: (1) A biological evaluation or equivalent document (2) Concurrence(s) from FWS and/or NMFS (3) Any other documentation of informal consultation Exception: If finding was made based on procedures provided by a letter of understanding, memorandum of agreement, programmatic agreement, or checklist provided by local HUD office, provide whatever documentation is mandated by that agreement. No, the Service(s) did not concur with the finding. à Continue to Question 5. 5. Formal consultation is required Section 7 of ESA (16 USC 1536) mandates consultation to resolve potential impacts to federally listed endangered and threatened species and critical habitats. If a HUD assisted project may affect any endangered or threatened species or critical habitat, then compliance is required with Section 7. See 50 CFR Part 402 Subpart B Consultation Procedures. à Once consultation is complete, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to Question 6 and provide the following: (1) A biological assessment, evaluation, or equivalent document (2) Biological opinion(s) issued by FWS and/or NMFS (3) Any other documentation of formal consultation 6. For the project to be brought into compliance with this section, all adverse impacts must be mitigated. Explain in detail the proposed measures that will be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. Mitigation as follows will be implemented: No mitigation is necessary. Explain why mitigation will not be made here: Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: • Map panel numbers and dates • Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates • Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers • Any additional requirements specific to your region Mitigation measures will be employed to avoid or minimize project impacts to listed species during project construct ion and occupancy, as applicable. These mitigation measures include, but are not limited to, avoidance, biological monitoring, and training of construction employees to recognize protected species that may potentially be in the vicinity of the project site. Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No !DLIFE United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ACH 3 Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122 Honolulu, Hawai'i 96850 July 19, 2021 In Reply Refer To: 01EPIFOO-2021-SL-0372 Rachel Okoji Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawai'i 96826 Subject: Species List for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development, Hilo, Hawai'i Dear Rachel Okoji Thank you for your email of June 25th requesting comment for the development of a Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development, Hilo, Hawai'i. We further appreciate your July 12, 2021 email including the link to the Draft Environmental Assessment. The regulatory requirements of 24 CFR 58.4 require units of local governments to assume the responsibility for environmental review, decision- -making, and actions that would otherwise apply to the Department of Housing and Human Development (HUD) under the provisions of NEPA and other provisions of law that further the purposes of NEPA as responsible entities" . This includes section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C 1531 et seq.), as amended. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) understands that the County of Hawaii will administer Federal funding from HUD in support of this project and will therefore act as the responsible entity on behalf of HUD as it pertains to section 7 consultation with the Service The proposed development site (TMKs [3] 2-4-025: :048,053. ,080) is an undeveloped lot encompassing 5. .05 acres in Hilo, on the island of Hawai'i The project proponent, A0705 Hilo, L.P proposes to develop an affordable rental complex of 64 units, consisting of 32 two-bedroom units, an estimated 24 three -bedroom units, and an estimated 8 four-bedroom units in Hilo. The development will include a community center for resident use and at least 80 parking stalls. This location is already zoned for multi- -family Habitat consists mostly of nonnative trees and shrubs. This letter has been prepared under the authority of, and in accordance with provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) as amended (ESA). We have reviewed INTERIOR REGION 9 INTERIOR REGION 12 COLUMBIA- -PACIFIC NORTHWEST PACIFIC ISLANDS IDAHO, MONTANA* OREGON* WASHINGTON AMERICAN SAMOA, GUAM, HAWAI'L, NORTH ERN PARTLAL MARIANA IS LANDS 2 Rachel Okoji the information you provided and pertinent information in our files, as it pertains to listed species in accordance with section 7 of the ESA. The Service provides the following comments to assist you in your planning process so that impacts to trust resources can be avoided through site preparation and construction Our data indicate the following federally listed species may occur or transit through the vicinity of the proposed project area: the threatened Hawaiian goose or nene (Branta sandvicensis), the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat or ope'ape' 'a (Lasiurus cinereus semotus), the endangered Hawaiian petrel or "ua' u (Pierodroma sandwicensis), the endangered Hawai' 'i distinct population segment of the band- -rumped storm- -petrel or ake' ake (Oceanodroma castro), the threatened Newell 's shearwater or a'o (Puffinus auricularis newellf), the endangered Hawaiian stilt or ae'o (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni), the endangered Hawaiian coot or alae ke' oke' o (Fulica alai), and the endangered Blackburn' 's sphinx moth (Manduca blackburni). The Hawaiian petrel, band- -rumped storm- -petrel, and Newell S shearwater will hereafter, collectively be referred to as Hawaiian seabirds," and the Hawaiian stilt and Hawaiian coot will be referred to as "Hawaiian 9 waterbirds." 'There is no critical habitat for listed species in the vicinity of this proposed project. The Hawaiian hawk or io (Buteo solitarius), a species that was recently removed from the Federal list of threatened and endangered species, is known to occur in the area, While the Service no longer consults on the Hawaiian hawk, this species is still protected under Hawaiian state regulations (H. R.S. $195D-4) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U. S.C. 703-712) Please see our recommendations below and reference the aforementioned regulations for any additional consultation or mitigation requirements Hawaiian goose The Hawaiian goose is found on the islands of Hawai'i, Maui, Moloka'i, and Kaua*i. They are observed in a variety of habitats, but prefer open areas, such as pastures, golf courses, wetlands, natural grasslands and shrublands, and lava flows, Threats to the species include introduced mammalian and avian predators, wind energy facilities, and vehicle strikes To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to the Hawaiian goose we recommend you uncorporate the following measures into your project plan Do not approach, feed, or disturb the Hawaiian goose Ifa Hawaiian goose is observed loafing or foraging within the project area during the breeding season (September through April), have a biologist familiar with Hawaiian goose nesting behavior survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. Repeat surveys after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest) Cease all work immediately and contact the Service for further guidance if a nest is discovered within a radius of 150 feet (ft) of proposed project, or a previously undiscovered nest is found within the 150-ft radius after work begins. In areas where Hawaiian goose are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site Hawaiian hoary bat 3 Rachel Okoji The Hawaiian hoary bat roosts in both exotic and native woody vegetation across all islands and will leave young unattended in trees and shrubs when they forage. If trees or shrubs 15 ft or taller are cleared during the pupping season, there is a risk that young bats could inadvertently be harmed or killed since they are too young to fly or may not move away. Additionally, Hawaiian hoary bats forage for insects from as low as 3 ft to higher than 500 ft above the ground and can become entangled in barbed wire used for fencing, To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plan Do not disturb, remove, or trim woody plants greater than 15 ft tall during the bat birthing and pup- -rearing season (June I through September 15) Do not use barbed wire for fencing, Hawaiian seabirds Hawaiian seabirds may traverse the project area at night during the breeding, nesting and fledging seasons (March 1 to December 15). Outdoor lighting could result in seabird disorientation, fallout, and injury or mortality. Seabirds are attracted to lights and after circling the lights they may become exhausted and collide with nearby wires, buildings, or other structures or they may land on the ground. Downed seabirds are subject to increased mortality due to collision with automobiles, starvation, and predation by dogs, cats, and other predators. Young birds (fledglings) traversing the project area between September 15 and December 15, in their first flights from their mountain nests to the sea, are particularly vulnerable to light attraction To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to seabirds we recommend you incorporate the following measures into your project plan Fully shield all outdoor lights so the bulb can only be seen from below. Install automatic motion sensor switches and controls on all outdoor lights or turn off lights when human activity is not occurring in the lighted area Avoid nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 15 through December 15 Hawaiian waterbirds Hawaiian waterbirds are currently found in a variety of wetland habitats including freshwater marshes and ponds, coastal estuaries and ponds, artificial reservoirs, Colocasia esculenta (kalo or taro) lo' i or patches, irrigation ditches, sewage treatment ponds. Hawaiian stilts mnay also be found wherever ephemeral or persistent standing water may occur, Threats to these species include nonnative predators, habitat loss, and habitat degradation Based on the project details provided, your project may result in the creation of standing water or open water that could attract Hawaian waterbirds to the project site. In particular, the Hawaiian stilt is known to nest in sub-optimal locations (c.gr, any ponding water), if water is present. Hawaiian waterbirds attracted to sub-optimal habitat may suffer adverse impacts, such as predation and reduced reproductive success, and thus the project may create an attractive nuisance. Therefore, we recommend you work with our office during project planning so that we Rachel Okoji 4 may assist you in developing measures to avoid impacts to listed species (e.g fencing, vegetation control, predator management) To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian waterbirds we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plan In areas where waterbirds are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site If water resources are located within or adjacent to the project site, incorporate applicable best management practices regarding work in aquatic environments into the project design (see enclosed Aquatic Best Management Practices) Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species' biology conduct Hawaiian waterbird nest surveys where appropnate habitat occurs within the vicinity of the proposed project site prior to project initiation. Repeat surveys again within 3 days of project initiation and after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). If a nest or active brood is found o Contact the Service within 48 hours for further guidance Establish and maintain a 100- -ft buffer around all active nests and/or broods until 0 the chicks have fledged. Do not conduct potentially disruptive activities or habitat alteration within this buffer o Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species' biology present on the project site during all construction or earth moving activities until the chicks fledge to ensure that Hawaiian waterbirds and nests are not adversely impacted. Blackburn' 's sphinx moth The adult Blackburn' 's sphinx moth feeds on nectar from native plants, including Ipomoea pes caprae(beach morning glory), Plumbago zeylanica( ilie'e), Capparis sandwichiana (maiapilo) and others. Blackburn' 's sphinx moth larvae feed on nonnative Nicotiana glauca (tree tobacco), and native, federally listed, Nothocestrum spp. ("aiea). To pupate, the larvae burrow into the soil and can remain in a state of torpor for a year or more before emerging from the soil. Soil disturbance can result in death of the pupae We offer the following survey recommendations to assess whether the Blackburn' 's sphinx moth occurs within the project area A biologist familiar with the species should survey areas of proposed activities for Blackburn' 's sphinx moth and its larval host plants prior to work initiation. o Surveys should be conducted during the wettest portion of the year (usually November- -to-April or several weeks after a significant rain) and within 4-to-6 weeks prior to construction Surveys should include searches for adults, eggs, larvae, and signs of larval feeding (i.e. ,chewed stems, frass, or leaf damage) If moths, eggs, larvae, or native aiea or tree tobacco over 3-ft tall, are found 0 during the survey, please contact the Service for additional guidance to avoid umpacts to this species 5 Rachel Okoji aiea, or tree tobacco are found during surveys, it is imperative If no Blackburn' 's sphinx moth that measures be taken to avoid attraction of Blackburn' s sphinx moth to the project location and prohibit tree tobacco from entering the site. Tree tobacco can grow greater than 3.- -ft tall in approximately 6 weeks. If it grows over 3- -ft tall, the plants may become a host plant for Blackburn' s sphinx moth. We therefore recommend that you Remove any tree tobacco less than 3- -ft tall Monitor the Site every 4-to-6 weeks for new tree tobacco growth before, during, and after the proposed ground-disturbing activity Monitoring for tree tobacco can be completed by any staff, such as groundskeeper or regular maintenance crew, provided with picture placards of tree tobacco at different life stages Hawaiian hawk The Hawaiian hawk was recently federally delisted but remains a listed species under Hawai'i State law. The Hawaiian hawk is known to occur across a broad range of forest habitats throughout the island of Hawai'i. Loud, irregular and unpredictable activities, such as using heavy equipment or building a structure, near an endangered Hawaiian hawk nest may cause nest failure. Harassment of Hawaiian hawk nesting sites can alter feeding and breeding patterns or result in nest or chick abandonment. Nest disturbance can also increase exposure of chicks and juveniles to inclement weather or predators To avoid and minimize impacts to Hawaiian hawks we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plan If work must be conducted between March 1 through September 30, during the Hawaiian hawk breeding season, have a biologist familiar with the species conduct a nest search of the project footprint and surrounding areas immediately prior to the start of construction activities o Pre-disturbance surveys for Hawaiian hawks are only valid for 14 days. If disturbance for the specific location does not occur within 14 days of the survey conduct another survey Clearing of vegetation or construction activities should not occur within 1,600 ft of any active Hawalian hawk nest during the breeding season until the young have fledged Regardless of the time of year, avoid trimming or cutting trees containing a hawk nest, as nests may be re- -used during consecutive breeding seasons Other Measures to Reduce Mortality of Listed Animal Species Additional measures for housing developments common to all listed animal species that will reduce mortality or predation include the following Post and enforce low speed limits to reduce vehicle collisions with wildlife. pets, including cats and dogs, to be on leash at all times outside Require all Require garbage cans with lids to reduce populations of rats and mongoose, which are invasive species and prey upon native and endangered species Provide signage instructing residents and visitors to avoid approaching, feeding, or disturbing wildlife 6 Rachel Okoji The Service recommends incorporating all applicable avoidance and minimization measures into If you determine the your project design to avoid and minimize effects on protected species proposed project may affect federally listed species, we recommend you contact our office early in the planning process so that we may assist you with ESA compliance. We appreciate your efforts to conserve protected species. If you have questions regarding this letter, please contact Melissa Cady, Fish and Wildlife Biologist at 808-933- -6963 or melissa cady@fws. gov. When referring to this project, please include this reference number: O1EPIF00-202 1-SL-0372. Sincerely, Digitally signed by CHELSIE CHELSIE JAVAR JAVAR SALAS Date: 2021.07.19 SALAS 13.23:51 -10'00 Island Team Manager Maui Nui and Hawai 'i Island Enclosure (1): Aquatic Best Management Practices Desiree Moore, Hawai 'i County CC Janice Takahashi, HHFDC Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office Adminstrative Staff U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Recommended Standard Best Management Practices The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) recommends the following measures to be incorporated into project planning to avoid or minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Best Management Practices (BMPs) include the incorporation of procedures or materials that may be used to reduce either direct or indirect negative impacts to aquatic habitats that result from project construction-related activities. These BMPs are recommended in addition to, and do not over- -ride any terms, conditions, or other recommendations prepared by the USFWS, other federal, state or local agencies. If you have questions concerning these BMPs, please contact the USFWS Aquatic Ecosystems Conservation Program at 808- -792-9400 1, Authorized dredging and filling- -related activities that may result in the temporary or permanent loss of aquatic habitats should be designed to avoid indirect, negative impacts to aquatic habitats beyond the planned project area. 2. Dredging/filling in the marine environment should be scheduled to avoid coral spawning and recruitment periods, and sea turtle nesting and hatching periods. Because these periods are variable throughout the Pacific islands, we recommend contacting the relevant local, state, or federal fish and wildlife resource agency for site specific guidance 3. Turbidity and siltation from project- -related work should be minimized and contained within the project area by silt containment devices and curtailing work during flooding or adverse tidal and weather conditions, BMPs should be maintained for the life of the construction period until turbidity and siltation within the project area is stabilized. All project construction- -related debris and sediment containment devices should be removed and disposed of at an approved site. 4. All project construction-related materials and equipment (dredges, vessels, backhoes, silt curtains, etc.) to be placed in an aquatic environment should be inspected for pollutants including, but not limited to; marine fouling organisms, grease, oil, etc., and cleaned to remove pollutants pnor to use. Project related activities should not result in any debris disposal, non-native species introductions, or attraction of non- -native pests to the affected or adjacent aquatic or terrestrial habitats. Implementing both a litter-control plan and a Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point plan (HACCP see https://www fws gov/policy/A1750fw1 html) can help to prevent attraction and introduction of non- -native species 5. Project construction- -related materials (fill revetment rock. pipe, etc.) should not be stockpiled in or in close proximity to aquatic habitats and should be protected from erosion (e.g.; with filter fabric, etc.), to prevent materials from being carried into waters by wind, rain, or high surf 6. Fueling of project- related vehicles and equipment should take place away from the aquatic environment and a contingency plan to control petroleum products accidentally spilled during the project should be developed. The plan should be retained on site with the person responsible for compliance with the plan. Absorbent pads and containment booms should be stored on-site to facilitate the clean-up of accidental petroleum releases 7. All deliberately exposed soil or under-layer materials used in the project near water should be protected from erosion and stabilized as soon as possible with geotextile, filter fabric or native or non-invasive vegetation matting, hydro- -seeding, etc Exhibit 8: Explosive and Flammable Hazards Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 State of Hawaii Department of Defense 3949 Diamond Head Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96816 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Exhibit 9: Farmland Protection 6 Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map 21809802181030218108021811302181180218123021812802181330218138021814302180980218103021810802181130218118021812302181280218133021813802181430281120 281170 281220 281270 281320 281370 281420 281120 281170 281220 281270 281320 281370 281420 19° 42' 58'' N 155° 5' 18'' W19° 42' 58'' N155° 5' 6'' W19° 42' 43'' N 155° 5' 18'' W19° 42' 43'' N 155° 5' 6'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 5N WGS84 0100200 400 600 Feet 03060 120 180 Meters Map Scale: 1:2,280 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. MAP LEGENDMAP INFORMATIONArea of Interest (AOI)Area of Interest (AOI)SoilsSoil Map Unit PolygonsSoil Map Unit LinesSoil Map Unit PointsSpecial Point FeaturesBlowoutBorrow PitClay SpotClosed DepressionGravel PitGravelly SpotLandfillLava FlowMarsh or swampMine or QuarryMiscellaneous WaterPerennial WaterRock OutcropSaline SpotSandy SpotSeverely Eroded SpotSinkholeSlide or SlipSodic SpotSpoil AreaStony SpotVery Stony SpotWet SpotOtherSpecial Line FeaturesWater FeaturesStreams and CanalsTransportationRailsInterstate HighwaysUS RoutesMajor RoadsLocal RoadsBackgroundAerial PhotographyThe soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000.Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements.Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation ServiceWeb Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required.This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below.Soil Survey Area: Island of Hawaii Area, HawaiiSurvey Area Data: Version 11, Sep 11, 2018Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger.Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Dec 31, 2009—Nov 28, 2016The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.Custom Soil Resource Report7 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 639 Keaukaha-Urban land complex, 2 to 10 percent slopes 13.9 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 13.9 100.0% Custom Soil Resource Report 8 Exhibit 10: Floodplain Management USGS The National Map: Orthoimagery. Data refreshed April, 2019. National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000250 Feet Ü155°5'31.01"W 19°43'5.78"N 155°4'53.55"W 19°42'31.91"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOODHAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE)Zone A, V, A99With BFE or DepthZone AE, AO, AH, VE, AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areasof 1% annual chance flood with averagedepth less than one foot or with drainageareas of less than one square mile Zone X Future Conditions 1% AnnualChance Flood HazardZone X Area with Reduced Flood Risk due toLevee. See Notes.Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to LeveeZone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard Zone X Area of Undetermined Flood HazardZone D Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer Levee, Dike, or Floodwall Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance17.5 Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Effective LOMRs Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from theauthoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This mapwas exported on 8/8/2019 at 6:10:37 PM and does notreflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date andtime. The NFHL and effective information may change orbecome superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following mapelements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels,legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers,FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images forunmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used forregulatory purposes. Legend OTHER AREAS OFFLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERALSTRUCTURES OTHERFEATURES MAP PANELS 8 1:6,000 B 20.2 The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. Exhibit 11: Historic Preservation SCS Project Number 2340-2 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR A 0.6447-ACRE PROPERTY IN KŪKŪAU 1ST AHUPUA‘A, SOUTH HILO DISTRICT, HAWAI‘I ISLAND, HAWAI‘I [TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080] Prepared By: Glenn G. Escott, M.A. MAY 2022 FINAL Prepared for: Urban Housing Communities, LLC 2000 E. Fourth Street, Suite 205 Santa Ana, CA 92705 1357 Kapi‘olani Boulevard, Suite 850 Honolulu, HI 96814 Hawai‘i Island Office: PO Box 155 Kea‘au, HI 96749 This Page Intentionally Left Blank ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................................................................... iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... iv INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 1 METHODS ................................................................................................................................. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................................................................. 9 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS ....................................................................................... 11 PRE-CONTACT ACCOUNTS OF HILO and Puna Districts ................................................. 11 EARLY HISTORIC ACCOUNTS OF HILO........................................................................... 12 THE MĀHELE OF 1848 AND LAND COMMISSION AWARDS ....................................... 12 CHANGING RESIDENTIAL AND LAND-USE PATTERNS (1845-1865) ......................... 16 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES .......................................................................................... 19 RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS ............................................................................................................... 26 EXPECTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL PATTERNS ..................................................................................... 28 PEDESTRIAN SURVEY RESULTS ......................................................................................................... 28 CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................................................... 31 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................................................... 36 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: 5,500 K-Series Map of Hawai‘i Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo!, 2003. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS). .................. 2 Figure 2: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). .................................. 3 Figure 3: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Project Area (County of Hawai‘i Planning Department, 2019). .................................................................................................. 4 Figure 4: Aerial Photograph Showing Project Area, Hilo, HI, Zone 5 North, 281222 m E, 2181166 m N. (Google Earth, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USGS). ................................................................................................ 5 Figure 5: Proposed Kaiāulu o Kapi‘olani Affordable Housing Project Site Plan Showing AA Project Area. ........................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 6: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area and Current Project Area (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006: 3). .................................................. 8 Figure 7: Hawai‘i Island Soil Survey Map Showing Location of Project Area and Soil Series Types (Adapted from Sato et al. 1973, Plate 74). ................................................................. 10 Figure 8: Portion of 1825 Map of Hilo Bay and Project Area Location (Malden 1825). ............ 13 Figure 9: Portion of 1891 Hilo Property Title Map Showing Project Area Location and Eastern Kūkūau 1st Ahupua‘a Land Commission Awards (Baldwin 1891). ..................................... 15 Figure 10: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow and Previous Archaeological Studies (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). ...................................................................................................... 20 iii Figure 11: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area and Current Project Area (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006: 3). ................................................ 23 Figure 12: Map Showing Location of Site 25547, Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area and Current Project Area (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006: 13). ........................................................... 24 Figure 13: Site 25547 Plan View Map (Nelson et al. 2006: 14). ................................................. 25 Figure 14: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow and Sites Listed on the HRHP and/or NRHP Within One Half Mile Radius (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). ............................................. 27 Figure 15: Photograph of Site #50-10-35-07436 Serrao Winery Building Looking Northwest. 29 Figure 16: Aerial Photograph Showing Project Area and Surrounding Land-Use, Hilo, HI, Zone 5 North, 281420 m E, 2181994 m N. (Google Earth, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USGS). Un-shaded Structures are Residential Dwellings. ............................................................................................................................. 30 Figure 17: Photograph of Northwest Corner of Project Area Looking Southeast. ...................... 32 Figure 18: Photograph of Near Center of Project Area Looking Northeast. ............................... 33 Figure 19: Photograph of Near South End of Project Area Looking Northeast. ......................... 34 Figure 20: Photograph of Modern Culvert at Center of Project Area Looking Southwest. ........ 35 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Land Commission Awards in Waiākea Ahupua‘a......................................................... 14 Table 1: Events Associated with the Project Area. ...................................................................... 17 Table 2: Previous Archaeological Studies Near the Project Area. .............................................. 21 Table 3: Inventory of Registered Historic Properties Within a 0.5 Mile Search Radius. ............ 26 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted an Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) of a 0.6447-acre parcel [TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080] in Kūkūau 1st Ahupa‘a, South Hilo District, Hawai‘i Island to identify historic properties within the project area. Parcel 080 is an easement located southeast of Kūkūau Street that is bounded to the north by Kūkūau Street, to the east by undeveloped land (Parcel 048), and by residential properties to the south and west. The AIS was conducted as supporting documentation required for the proposed Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) Kaiāulu o Kapi‘olani Affordable Housing Project within TMK: (3) 2-4-025: 048, 053 and 080. The development will include nine residential buildings containing 32 two-bedroom units, 24 three-bedroom units, and 8 four- bedroom units, access roads, and a community center and 117-stall parking lot. The proposed undertaking will include grubbing, grading and trenching for utilities. The proposed project is a private project undertaken on private land, using private funding, under the direction of the OHCD, requiring County of Hawai‘i and Hawai‘i state approvals/permits, and is subject to Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) 6E-42 historic preservation review. The proposed OHCD project will receive partial federal funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and is considered a federal action and undertaking, as defined in Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 800.16(y) and is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended (2006). Under 24 CFR Part 58 Section 5 of 1998, as amended (2003), OHCD is the entity responsible for compliance with environmental requirements including those relating to NHPA and Section 106. A pedestrian survey of TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080 was conducted on July 11, 2019 by SCS Senior Archaeologists Glenn Escott M.A. and Suzan Escott, B.A. There were no historic properties identified within TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080. As there were no archaeological sites identified within the current project area (TMK: (3) 2-4- 025:080), and Site 25547 previously recorded within TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048 was adequately documented during the Nelson et al. (2006) AIS study and no further work was recommended for Site 25547 (Nelson et al. 2006:18), these findings support a project effect determination of no historic properties directly affected the proposed affordable housing. Given that the project area is surrounded by existing rental housing, modern residential neighborhoods, the police station, businesses, paved roads, sidewalks, and overhead utility lines, these findings support a project determination of no added visual effect on the existing historic properties located within one-half mile of the project area. These findings support a project effect determination of “No historic properties affected” pursuant to HAR §13-284-7(a)(1) and no historic properties affected pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1). 1 INTRODUCTION PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTION Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted an Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) of a 0.6447-acre parcel [TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080] in Kūkūau 1st Ahupa‘a, South Hilo District, Hawai‘i Island to identify historic properties within the project area (Figures 1 through 4). Parcel 080 is an easement located southeast of Kūkūau Street and is owned by Giampaolo Boschetti. Parcel 080 is bounded to the north by Kūkūau Street, to the east by undeveloped land (Parcel 048), and by residential properties to the south and west. Parcel 080 is situated at 95 feet (29 meters) above mean sea level on level land. The AIS was conducted under contract to Urban Housing Communities, LLC. In response to Hawai‘i Island’s affordable housing needs, the Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) and the developer are proposing to build a 64- unit low-income housing development on TMK: (3) 2-4-025: 048, 053 and 080 (Figure 5). The development will include nine residential buildings containing 32 two-bedroom units, 24 three-bedroom units, and 8 four-bedroom units, access roads, and a community center and 117-stall parking lot. The proposed undertaking will include grubbing, grading and trenching for utilities. The proposed project is a private project undertaken on private land, using private funding, under the direction of the OHCD, requiring County of Hawai‘i and Hawai‘i state approvals/permits, and is subject to Hawai‘i Revised Statutes (HRS) 6E-42 historic preservation review. The proposed OHCD project will receive partial federal funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and is considered a federal action and undertaking, as defined in Title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 800.16(y) and is subject to Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966, as amended (2006). Under 24 CFR Part 58 Section 5 of 1998, as amended (2003), OHCD is the entity responsible for compliance with environmental requirements including those relating to NHPA and Section 106. 2 Figure 1: 5,500 K-Series Map of Hawai‘i Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo!, 2003. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS). 3 Figure 2: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). 4 Figure 3: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Project Area (County of Hawai‘i Planning Department, 2019). 5 Figure 4: Aerial Photograph Showing Project Area, Hilo, HI, Zone 5 North, 281222 m E, 2181166 m N. (Google Earth, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USGS). 6 Figure 5: Proposed Kaiāulu o Kapi‘olani Affordable Housing Project Site Plan Showing AA Project Area. 7 Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted an AIS within TMK: (3) 3-2-4-025:048, 050, 052, 053, 059 (por.), 078 (por.), 080 (por.), 093, 106 (por.), 107 (por.), 108 (por.), 109 (por.), 110 (por.), 115 (por.), and 129 (por.) Parcels 048 and 053 (Nelson et al. 2006). The Nelson et al. (2006) AIS project area included the entirety of parcels 048 and 053, and a narrow corridor bisecting Parcel 080 (see Figure 6). The proposed affordable housing project area includes all of parcels 048, 053 and 080. No historic properties were identified within Parcel 080 during the current AIS fieldwork. The negative findings are presented in this Archaeological Assessment Report (AA) pursuant to HAR §13-284-5 that includes summaries of study methods, a project area description and maps, environmental background, cultural and historical background research, previous archaeological studies, project area study findings, significance and integrity assessments, and recommendations. The negative findings support a project effect determination of “No historic properties affected” pursuant to HAR §13-284- 7(a)(1). METHODS The archaeological inventory survey was undertaken in accordance with Hawai‘i Administrative Rules 13§13-284 and was performed in compliance with the Rules Governing Minimal Standards for Archaeological Inventory Surveys and Reports contained in Hawai‘i Administrative Rules 13§13-276. The investigation included the following procedures: 1. SCS conducted historical and archaeological archival research including a search of historic maps, aerial photos, written records, Land Commission Award documents, State and County Planning and Tax Records documents, and previous archaeological reports. 2. SCS carried out a 100% pedestrian survey of the project area. 3. SCS documented the results of all research and fieldwork in this report. Prior to fieldwork, a search of geological maps, aerial photos, historical maps, historical documents, land-use records, and previous archaeological reports was conducted at the SHPD Hilo office library, the University of Hawai‘i – Hilo Mookini library, the County of Hawai‘i Planning Department website, the County of Hawai‘i Real Property Tax Office website, and the Hawai‘i Department of Accounting and General Services map website. 8 Figure 6: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area and Current Project Area (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006: 3). 9 A pedestrian survey was conducted on July 11, 2019 by SCS Senior Archaeologists Glenn Escott M.A. and Suzan Escott, B.A. The fieldwork took a total of 14 person-hours to complete. A series of northeast/southwest transects spaced one meter apart were walked across the entire project area. Ground cover consisted of mown grass, trees and some low ferns and bushes. Ground visibility was fair. Glenn Escott was the principal investigator and project director for the current study. This report contains background information outlining the project area environmental and cultural contexts, a presentation of previous archaeological work within the study area and in the immediate vicinity, current survey expectations based on the previous work, and survey results. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project area is situated on level to moderately sloping land at 95 feet (29 meters) above mean sea level (amsl). The project area substrate is a Mauna Loa lava flow dated between 750 and 1,500 years ago (Wolfe and Morris 1996). Soil in the project area is Keaukaha Series (rKFD) extremely rocky muck overlaying pāhoehoe lava (Sato 1973:27). The soil is thin and well drained with 6% to 20% slopes. Annual rainfall ranges from 120 to 160 inches and drains toward the east (Giambelluca et al. 2013). There is a narrow drainage area that bisects the middle of the property. Plant communities in the project are dominated by trees, grasses, ferns, and bushes. Tree species include gunpowder (Trema orientalis), autograph (Clusia rosea), banyan (Ficus sp.), guava (Psidium sp.), and bingabing (Macaranga mappa). 10 Figure 7: Hawai‘i Island Soil Survey Map Showing Location of Project Area and Soil Series Types (Adapted from Sato et al. 1973, Plate 74). 11 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS Many archaeologists believe that Hawai‘i Island was first settled around A.D. 1,000 by people sailing from the Marquesas (Athens et al. 2014; Dye 2011; Kahn et al. 2014; Kirch 2011; Kirch and McCoy 2007; Mulrooney et al. 2011; Reith et al. 2011; Wilmhurst et al. 2011a and 2011b). An article published in the Journal of Archaeological Science reviewing radiocarbon dates recovered at archaeological sites on the Island of Hawai‘i suggests that, by relying on only carbon samples from short-lived plant remains, the most reliable dates point to initial Polynesian colonization of Hawai‘i Island occurring between A.D. 1220 and 1261 (Rieth et al. 2011:2747). Hilo was, by most estimates, one of the first settlements on the Island of Hawai‘i. The rich marine resources of the Hilo Bay area and the gently sloping forests of Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea provided abundant resources. Fresh water was available from the Wailoa and Wailuku rivers and smaller streams such as Waiākea, Waiolama, Pukihae, and ‘Alenaio. PRE-CONTACT ACCOUNTS OF HILO AND PUNA DISTRICTS The earliest account of the Hilo Bay area appears in ‘Umi-a-Liloa’s (1600–1620) conquest of the Island of Hawai‘i, which establishes Hilo as a royal center by the sixteenth century. In the account, ‘Umi-a-Liloa began his conquest of the Island of Hawai‘i by defeating chief Kulukulu‘ā, who lived in Waiākea, and the other chiefs of Hilo (Kamakau 1992:16–17). ‘Umi-a-Liloa’s second son, Keawe-nui-a-‘Umi, ruled Hāmākua, Hilo, and Puna from his residence at Hilo (ibid: 34). It was from Hilo that he waged war on the Kona chiefs and unified the island. Keawe-nui-a-‘Umi’s descendants single handedly continued rule for many generations from Hilo. After the death of Keawe-nui-a-‘Umi the kingdom was divided into three parts and was established under warring chiefs; Hilo was ruled by Kumalae-nui-pu`awa-lau and his son Makua (Kamakau 1992: 45). It was during the period of time that Kamehameha I was born. Kalani‘ōpu‘u’s grandson, Keoua Kuahu‘ula and nephew Kamehameha vied for control over the six chiefdoms constituting the island kingdom and Keoua conquered Hilo chief Keawe-mau-hili and harvested the benefits for a short time only to be killed by Kamehameha late in 1791. Kamehameha’s son Liholiho was born in Hilo in November 1797 (ibid:22). 12 EARLY HISTORIC ACCOUNTS OF HILO Early accounts of settlements along the windward shores describe the area as divided into several distinct environmental regions (Ellis 1963: 291-292). At Hilo Bay, from the coast to a distance of five or six miles inland, scattered subsistence agriculture was evident, followed by a region of tall fern and bracken, flanked at higher elevations by a forest region between 10 and 20 miles wide, beyond which was an expanse of grass and lava (Ibid:403). A map of Hilo Bay drawn by Malden in 1825 shows an area of agricultural fields inland of the bay (Figure 8) The American Missionary C.S. Stewart wrote in 1825, “the first four miles of the country is open and uneven, and beautifully sprinkled with clumps, groves, and single trees of the bread-fruit, pandanus, and candle tree” (Stewart 1970:361-363). The majority of inhabitants in 1825 lived within this coastal region. Taro, plantains, bananas, coconuts, sweet potatoes, and breadfruit were grown individually or in small garden plots. Fish, pig, dog, and birds were also raised and captured for consumption. Wood, such as ‘ōhi‘a and koa for house construction, canoe building, and fires was obtained from the upland agricultural zone (McEldowney 1979:18-19), and from the dense forests above (Ellis 1963:236). THE MĀHELE OF 1848 AND LAND COMMISSION AWARDS Article IV of the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles was passed in December 1845 and began the legal process of private land ownership. The Māhele (1848-1850) established a board of five commissioners to oversee land claims and to issue patents and leases for valid claims. Many scholars believe that Kauikeaouli (Kamehameha III) established laws intended to protect Hawaiian sovereignty and crown lands from foreigners who had already begun claiming ownership of land they were granted permission to use for homes and business interests (Daws 1968:111; Kame‘eleihiwa 1992: 169-70, 176; Kelly 1983: 45; Kuykendall 1938(1): 145 footnote 47, 152, 165-6, 170). Among other things, the foreigners were demanding private ownership of land to secure their island investments, particularly agricultural and ranching ventures (Kuykendall 1938(1): 138, 145, 178, 184, 202, 206, 271; Kame‘eleihiwa 1992: 178). 13 Figure 8: Portion of 1825 Map of Hilo Bay and Project Area Location (Malden 1825). 14 As legal statutes defining the Māhele continued to be enacted from 1845 to 1850, the lands of the kingdom of Hawai‘i were divided among the king (crown lands), the ali‘i and konohiki, and the government. Once lands were thus divided and private ownership was instituted, the maka`āinana (commoners), if they had been made aware of the procedures, were able to claim the plots on which they had been cultivating and living as stipulated in the Kuleana Act (1850). These claims, however, could not include any previously cultivated or presently fallow land, ‘okipu‘u (forest clearing created to allow sunlight to reach the forest floor), stream fisheries, or many other resources traditionally necessary for survival (Kame‘eleihiwa 1992:295; Kelly 1983:45-76; Kirch and Sahlins 1992 vol.1:3, 135-137, and vol. 2:2). The right of claimants to land was based on the written testimony of at least two witnesses who could corroborate the claimant’s long-standing occupation and use of the lot(s) in question. The claimant was then awarded a patent for the property, subsequently called Land Commission Awards (LCAs) (Chinen 1961:16). Prior to the Māhele, Kūkūau 1st Ahupua‘a belonged to King Kamehameha I and was Crown Lands during the Māhele of 1848. John Young’s son Keoni Ana was awarded 9,360 acres of land within Kūkūau 1st in 1851 as part of Land Commission Award (LCA) 8515. Nine smaller LCAs were awarded within Kūkūau 1st Ahupua‘a (Table 1 and Figure 9). Table 1: Land Commission Awards in Waiākea Ahupua‘a. Award To LCA Description Papa 00513 2 houses Puniono 02606 0.93 acres, 2 house lots & 1 cultivated plot Kahue 02663 3.75 acres Kahue 02664 0.34 acres Aiko 03205 2 lots: 0.55 acres and 0.46 acres Haoleopunui 03206 2.48 acres Hoomoo 03993 2.06 acres, 1 house Ana 08815 9,360 acres Kanakaole 11045B 3 houses Ouluihi, wahine 11144 1 ‘apana 15 Figure 9: Portion of 1891 Hilo Property Title Map Showing Project Area Location and Eastern Kūkūau 1st Ahupua‘a Land Commission Awards (Baldwin 1891). 16 The Land Commission awards were small in area, between 0.34 and 3.75 acres, and the majority of awards were made to native claimants. Most of the awards are makai (east) of the current project area. The project area parcel is not associated with any LCA. The LCAs closest to the project area were awarded in Kūkūau 1st Ahupua‘a and Waiākea Ahupua‘a, just south of the current project area (see Figure 9). From testimony given by LCA claimants, it is clear that the awards included house lots and agricultural lots under cultivation. The only references to cultigens given in the testimonies are hala (Pandanus tectorius) and kalo (Colocasia esculenta). There are also references to uncultivated “wastelands” of pāhoehoe lava in the region of the project area lands. CHANGING RESIDENTIAL AND LAND-USE PATTERNS (1845-1865) Between 1845 and 1865 traditional land-use and residential patterns underwent a dramatic change. In particular, the regular use of Hilo Bay by foreign vessels, the whaling industry, the establishment of missions in the Hilo area, the introduction of the sandalwood trade, the legalization of private land ownership, the introduction of cattle ranching, and the introduction of sugar cane cultivation all brought about changes in settlement patterns and long-established land-use patterns (Kelly et al. 1981). Hilo became the center of population and settlements in outlying regions declined or disappeared. The area of Hilo continued to develop as a commercial port throughout the twentieth century. Hilo Bay Front area became a store front venue, while the outlying regions were developed as industrial parks, shopping malls, and residential neighborhoods. The historical events at Hilo have received significant attention and presentation elsewhere (Desha 2000; Kelly et al. 1981; George 1948; Leithead 1974). Those events and trends that do or may relate directly to the project area are synthesized below. A synthesis of research into relevant newspaper articles conducted by Kent Warshauer provides a chronology of historical events associated with the project area (Table 1). Sandalwood was being shipped out of Hilo Bay in the first 20 years of the 19th century (Kelly et al. 1981:25). In April of 1822, the first missionary, Auna, a Tahitian, preached in Hilo. Many other missionaries soon followed. Whaling ships are documented as docking at Hilo by at least 1824. Whaling declined precipitously in the mid 1800s due to depredations by the U.S. Confederate fleet, increased use worldwide of 17 kerosene, and increased cost of outfitting, among other things (George 1948:32). Whaling hobbled on in the islands, and the wreck of the Tamerlane in 1892 marks the end of commercial whaling in the area (Rogers 1999). Table 2: Events Associated with the Project Area. Date Event Warshauer Article 1986 200 foot rock groin built at Kanukuokamanu 2004:F2 1963 Mouth of Wailoa River configured to current way 2004:F2 1963 Mouth of Wailoa River dredged to 12 feet deep 2004:F2 1952 Mouth of Wailoa River dredged to 8 feet deep 2004:F2 1946 Tsunami April 1, destroyed Railroad (RR) bridge 2002c:23 1940 Seawalls built at mouth of Wailoa River 2004b:F2 1938 Fifth Wailoa Bridge built 2002a:18 1935 Current Hilo Iron Works current building built 2003:28 1923 RR swing bridge replaces temporary bridge there 2002c:23 1922 RR bridge damaged by tsunami 2002c:23 1922 Tsunami November 16 2002c:23 1918 Tsunami September 18 2002c:23 1916 RR wharf closed down due to conditions 2002d:35 1913 Hilo Iron Works starts up at current place 2003:28 1910 First Sampan 2004b:F2 1907 Suisan started 2004b:F2 1903 RR wharf open for business 2002d:35 1903 Fourth Wailoa Bridge built 2002a:18 1903 First RR rotating bridge built 2002c:21 1903 First seawall, Puna side 2004b:F2 1901 Jetty expanded into bay 2004b:F2 1897 First jetty built 2004b:F2 1892 Third Wailoa Bridge built 2002a:18 1885 First steam powered vessel 2004b:F2 1880 Second Wailoa Bridge built 2002a:17 1879 Waiākea Sugar Mill built 2004b:F2 1877 Tsunami destroys Spencer’s wharf 2001:7 1877 Tsunami May 10 2001:7 1861 Spencer built his wharf in Waiākea 2001:7 1859 First Wailoa Bridge built 2002a:17 18 Due to economic, cultural and natural forces, the focus of habitation had fully shifted from the Wailoa River side of Hilo Bay to the Wailuku River side of the bay by 1885. “Hilo in 1885 was a small settlement with only a few hundred inhabitants. Waiākea had no frame buildings, just a few grass homes (after the tidal wave of 1877)” (Leithead 1974:59). The industrial and commercial concerns began to expand in the Wailoa River vicinity. Markets, landings, agriculture, and milling soon flourished in the Waiākea side of the bay (Kelly et al. 1981; Leithead 1974). Habitation then increased in the Waiākea area on the heels of the industrial developments in the late 1800s and early 1900s. By 1901 sugar dominated the island’s industry, and Hilo was the epicenter of production and export. Railroads connected sugar factors along the Hāmākua and Puna coasts to the mills and wharves at Hilo. An important spur of the railroad line connected the switch yard to the wharf. The first pier at Kuhio Wharf was built between 1912 and 1916 (Kelly et al. 1981:194). A second was added in 1923. The railroad began operation in the Hilo area in 1899, and was abandoned in 1946 (Kelly et al. 1981). The first railroad to wharf connection was at the mouth of the Wailoa River. Railroad and sugar expansion coincided with one another, although not always productively (Kelly et al. 1981:154). The tsunami of 1946 struck Hilo Bay just as one train was passing through the project area. The Alenaio canal was created to facilitate the filling of the lowlands near the ocean that had once been fishponds and taro fields just to the west and beyond the project area. It was upgraded with stone walls in 1917 (Kelly et al. 1981:220). Black sand from the beach was pumped up into the Waiolama swamps to fill them (Kelly et al. 1981:223). Removing beach sand to Waiolama swamp partially undermined the railroad. When the sand dredging started for the nearby Ponahawai taro and pond filling, the railroad company complained, and the dredging stopped (Kelly et al. 1981:224). Dredging started up again in 1922, and 31,763 cubic yards of black sand was then taken from the shoreline and placed in the Ponahawai drainage (Kelly et al. 1981:225). “Altogether, between the years 1917 to 1923, a total or roughly 250,000 cubic yards of fine black-lava sand from the beach at Hilo Bay was pumped…” into the interior wetlands (Kelly et al. 1981:225). 19 Banyan Drive was built in the early 1930’s, and soon thereafter banyan trees were planted in regular intervals on both sides of the drive (Warshauer 2003b, 2004). The first banyan tree was planted in 1933 (Warshauer 2003b) The last tree was planted in 1972 by Mrs. Richard Nixon to replace one that was planted previously in 1952, but that had been destroyed by “seismic sea wave” in 1952 (Warshauer 2004:D3). Some trees that have been destroyed have not been replanted. PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES At least fourteen archaeological studies were conducted in the area near the current project area (Figure 10 and Table 2). Six studies included portions of Kūkūau 1st Ahupua‘a (Kelly & Athens 1982, Nelson et al. 2006, Rosendahl 1988, Rechtman 2009, Wickler & Ward 1992, and Wilkinson et al. 2012). There were no archaeological sites identified in the vast majority of previous archaeological studies. This is not surprising since much of the area within Hilo town has been developed. It is likely that many archaeological remains have been disturbed and obscured by construction activities associated with modern development (Hudson 1932:226). Thrum (1907) and Stokes and Dye (1991) documented heiau located on the Island of Hawai‘i. Many of the heiau in the Hilo area had been dismantled by the time Thrum conducted his study. There were no heiau remaining in Kūkūau 1st Ahupua‘a when Thrum conducted his study. Only five of the fourteen previous archaeology studies documented a few archaeological sites (see Table 2). Walker and Rosendahl (1996) recorded five historic sugarcane sites, including Waiakea Sugar Plantation field features and remains from the old Hilo Sugar Company mill. Pre-Contact era to early post-Contact era artifacts were recovered from one feature, indicating a pre-Contact to early post-Contact component. No radiocarbon samples were dated. The plantation field features and artifacts were identified south of Hāla‘i Hill in Ponahawai Ahupua‘a, outside of the current project area (see Figure 10). The old Hilo Sugar Company mill site is north of the current project area, though the mill is no longer present, and more modern structures have been built over the site. 20 Figure 10: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow and Previous Archaeological Studies (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). 21 Table 3: Previous Archaeological Studies Near the Project Area. Study Reference Study Type Location Results Thrum 1907 Heiau Survey Hawaiian Island No Heiau in Kūkūau 1st Ahupa‘a Hudson 1932 Survey East Hawaii Very Few Sites in Hilo Area Kelly & Athens 1982 Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Wailoa River No Archaeological Sites at Wailoa River Rosendahl & Talea 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey Hilo Airport No Archaeological Sites Rosendahl 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey Four Locations in Hilo, One Just North of Current Project No Archaeological Sites Smith & Tourtellotte 1988 Burial Discovery Mouth of Wailoa River Single Burial Stokes and Dye 1991 Heiau Survey Hawaiian Island No Heiau in Kūkūau 1st Ahupa‘a Wickler & Ward 1992 Archaeological Investigation ‘Alenaio Stream Historic Artifacts Only, No Sites Walker & Rosendahl 1996 Archaeological Assessment Hilo Judicial Complex Five Historic Sites Rosendahl 2004 Archaeological Assessment Hilo Judicial Complex No Archaeological Sites Wolforth 2006 AIS Reed's Bay Beach Park Two Pre-Contact and Three Historic Sites Nelson et al. 2006 AIS Kūkūau 1st Ahupa‘a Historic Era Enclosure Clark & Rechtman 2006 Section 106 Mohouli Street One Historic Era Rock Mound Rechtman 2009 Archaeological Assessment Hilo Bay Front to Reed's Bay No Archaeological Sites Clark and Rechtman (2006) also recorded a single sugarcane era rock mound south of the current project area. Wolforth (2006) recorded the Kanakea Fishpond, pecked basins, and three historic sites, all of which north of the current project area. 22 A single set of burial remains were identified by Smith and Tourtellotte (1988) 2.0km northeast of the current project area, at the mouth of the Wailoa River. The burial site location is not plotted on Figure 10 as it is a culturally sensitive site. None of the previously identified archaeological sites will be affected by the current undertaking. Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted an AIS study (Nelson et al. 2006) adjacent to the current project area that included a narrow study corridor bisecting the current project area (see Figure 1 and Figure 11). A single archaeological site (Site #50-10-35- 25547) was recorded within TMK: (3) 2-4-025: 048 (Figure 12 and Figure 13). Site 25547 is a 24.0 m long (NE/SW) by 2.0 m wide by 2.0 m high Historic era linear enclosure constructed along a naturally occurring crack in a raised pāhoehoe bedrock outcrop (Nelson et al. 2006:12). The bedrock crack has been modified in three locations by stacking cobbles along the sides and across the middle of the crack (see Figure 13). The enclosure was likely constructed to keep animals. Site 25547 appeared to be unaltered and was in good condition. Site 25547 was assessed as significant under Criterion d, as having, or likely to yield information important to Historic era animal husbandry features. The integrity of Site 25547 was not assessed in the Nelson et al (2006) AIS report. It was determined that Site 25547 was adequately documented during the Nelson et al. (2006) study and, thus, no further work was recommended for Site 25547 (Nelson et al. 2006:18). The AIS report was approved by the Hawai‘i State Historic Division (SHPD) (Log No. 2006.3275, Doc. No. 0609JT83, Approval Letter dated September 28, 2006). 23 Figure 11: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area and Current Project Area (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006: 3). 24 Figure 12: Map Showing Location of Site 25547, Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area and Current Project Area (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006: 13). 25 Figure 13: Site 25547 Plan View Map (Nelson et al. 2006: 14). 26 RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS As the project has been determined by OHCD to be a federal undertaking as defined in 36 CFR 800.16(y) and, thus, is subject to historic preservation review per 36 CFR 800, in addition to review per HRS 6E-42, SCS conducted a records search to identify historic properties within a 0.5-mile radius of the project area/ APE to evaluate the potential for the project to have an adverse effect on one or more historic properties listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The records search was conducted at the SHPD Hilo office. The results of the records search indicate that there are nineteen historic properties listed on the Hawai‘i Register of Historic Places (HRHP) (Table 3 and Figure 14). Two of those sites are also listed on the NRHP. The historic properties include two historic districts, several church buildings, schools, commercial buildings, homes, and a Portuguese oven. Many of the buildings are characteristic of period style architecture. Table 4: Inventory of Registered Historic Properties Within a 0.5 Mile Search Radius. State Site No. Site Name Hawai‘i Register National Register 50-10-35-07417 Waiakea Mission or Haili Church 17-Nov-01 23-Apr-02 50-10-35-07418 Bay Front Historic District NA 50-10-35-07420 S. Hata Building 14-Jan-89 27-Aug-91 50-10-35-07422 Central Christian Church 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07436 Serrao Winery 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07445 Ling Hing Society 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07446 Konko-Kyo Daijin 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07447 Villa Franca District 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07449 Prudencio Portuguese Oven 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07456 Hilo Hongwanji 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07458 Old Chinese Language School 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07459 United Community Church 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07480 Waiakea Mill Camp Housing 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07481 Hilo House Type #6 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07483 Former Souza-Matsumura House 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07487 Hilo House Type #7 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07490 Hilo House Type #9 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07474 Cannon-Hill Boarding School 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07475 Hilo Boarding School Site 1-Jan-92 27 Figure 14: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow and Sites Listed on the HRHP and/or NRHP Within One Half Mile Radius (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). 28 The closest sites are Site #50-10-35-07436, the Serrao Winery, (see Figure 14) and Site #50-10-35-07449 (the Prudencio Portuguese Oven). The Serrao Winery building is constructed of stone (Figure 15). All of the sites listed on the HRHP and the NRHP within 0.5-mile radius of the project area/ APE are surrounded by the modern built environment including private residential neighborhoods, condominiums and rental housing, commercial businesses, paved roads, sidewalks and utility poles and lines (Figure 16). The proposed affordable housing buildings will not be larger in area or height than nearby existing buildings. Given that the project area is surrounded by existing condominium and rental housing, commercial businesses, the Hilo police station and Department of Motor Vehicle offices, modern residential neighborhoods, paved roads, sidewalks, and overhead utility lines, it is likely that the proposed affordable housing project will have no added visual effect on the existing historic properties located within one-half mile of the project area. EXPECTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL PATTERNS Based on previous archaeological studies, historical research, and land-use records, site types on the current project can be predicted to consist primarily of pre- Contact era to Historic era agricultural features including agricultural rock clearing mounds, rock walls, and agricultural terraces. Habitation features, such as enclosures and platforms are less likely to be located on the current project area. Though, it is possible that traditional Hawaiian pre-Contact era sites might have existed in the region, previous archaeological investigations have shown that Historic era to Modern era activities have often removed them from the landscape. PEDESTRIAN SURVEY RESULTS A pedestrian survey was conducted on July 11, 2019 by SCS Senior Archaeologists Glenn Escott M.A. and Suzan Escott, B.A. A series of northeast/southwest transects spaced one meter apart were walked across the entire project area. Most of Parcel 080 is a partially paved dirt road with vegetation along the edges and within the southern portion of the parcel where there is no road. Ground cover consisted of mown grass, trees and some low ferns and bushes (Figure 17 through Figure 20). It was possible to see the ground surface beneath the ferns where vegetation existed. Ground visibility was fair. 29 Figure 15: Photograph of Site #50-10-35-07436 Serrao Winery Building Looking Northwest. 30 Figure 16: Aerial Photograph Showing Project Area and Surrounding Land-Use, Hilo, HI, Zone 5 North, 281420 m E, 2181994 m N. (Google Earth, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USGS). Un-shaded Structures are Residential Dwellings. 31 TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080 is a private access easement with a partially paved driveway down the center of the parcel. The driveway provides access for residential homes on property along the west and south boundaries of Parcel 080. There is a modern drainage culvert constructed in the 1970s that crosses the center of Parcel 080 from the west to east. The culvert is constructed of three 36 inch diameter galvanized pipes within rock and cement foundation (Figure 19). No archaeological sites or features were located within the project area. CONCLUSION As there were no archaeological sites identified within the current project area (TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080), and as Site 25547 located within TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048 was adequately documented during the Nelson et al. (2006) study and no further work was recommended for Site 25547 (Nelson et al. 2006:18), these findings support a project effect determination of no historic properties directly affected the proposed affordable housing. All of the sites listed on the HRHP and the NRHP within 0.5-mile radius of the project area/ APE are surrounded by the modern built environment that including private residential neighborhoods, rental housing, businesses, paved roads, sidewalks and utility poles and lines. The proposed affordable housing buildings will not be larger in area or height than nearby existing buildings. Given that the project area is surrounded by existing rental housing, modern residential neighborhoods, the police station, businesses, paved roads, sidewalks, and overhead utility lines (See Figure 16), these findings support a project determination of no added visual effect on the existing historic properties located within one-half mile of the project area. These findings support a project effect determination of “No historic properties affected” pursuant to HAR §13-284-7(a)(1) and no historic properties affected pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1). 32 Figure 17: Photograph of Northwest Corner of Project Area Looking Southeast. 33 Figure 18: Photograph of Near Center of Project Area Looking Northeast. 34 Figure 19: Photograph of Near South End of Project Area Looking Northeast. 35 Figure 20: Photograph of Modern Culvert at Center of Project Area Looking Southwest. 36 REFERENCES CITED Athens, J., T. Reith, and T. Dye 2014 A paleoenvironmental and archaeological model-based age estimate for the colonization of Hawai‘i. American Antiquity, 79(4):144-55. Baldwin, E.D. 1891 Map of Hilo Town and Vicinity. Hawaiian Government Survey. Hawai‘i State Registered Map No. 1561. Chinen, J.J. 1961 Original Land Title in Hawaii. Published privately in Honolulu, Hawai‘i. Clark, M., and R. Rechtman 2006 Request for SHPO Concurrence with a Determination of No historic Properties Affected Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy act and in Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Hospice of Hilo Property, [TMK (3) 2-4-001:024 (por.), Waiākea Ahupua‘a, South Hilo district, Island of Hawai‘i. Rechtman Consulting, LLC. Cordy, R. 2000 Exalted Sits the Chief: The Ancient History of Hawai‘i Island. Mutual Publishing. Honolulu. County of Hawai‘i Planning Department 2019 https://www.planning.hawaiicounty.gov/resources/tax-maps-tmk-maps. County of Hawai‘i Real Property Tax Office 2019 https://qpublic.schneidercorp.com/Application.aspx?AppID= 1048&LayerID=23618&PageTypeID=2&PageID=9876. Daws, G. 1968 Shoal of Time: A History of the Hawaiian Islands. University of Hawaii Press. Honolulu. Desha, S.L. 2000 Kamehameha and his Warrior Kekūhaupi‘o. Kamehameha Schools Press, Honolulu. Dye, T. 2011 A model-based age estimate for Polynesian colonization of Hawai‘i. Archaeology in Oceania, 46:130-38. 37 Ellis. W. 1963 Narrative of a Tour of Hawaii, or Owhyhee. Advertiser Publishing. Honolulu. ESRI 2013 Arc GIS Explorer. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Ca. George, M. C. 1948 The Development of Hilo, Hawaii, TH. The Edwards Letter Shop, Ann Arbor. Giambelluca, T.W., Q. Chen, A.G. Frazier, J.P. Price, Y.-L. Chen, P.-S. Chu, J.K. Eischeid, and D.M. Delparte 2013 Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawai‘i. American Meteorology Society 94, 313-316, doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00228.1. Google Earth 2013 Google Earth Imagery. Google Earth. Mountain View, Ca. Hudson, A.E. 1932 The Archaeology of East Hawai‘i. MS, Bernice P. Bishop Museum. Kahn, J., Rieth, P. Kirch, J. Athens, and G. Murakami 2014 Re-dating of the Kuli‘ou‘ou rockshelter, O‘ahu, Hawai‘i: Location of the first radiocarbon date from the Pacific Islands. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 123(1):67-90. Kamakau, S. 1992 Ruling Chiefs of Hawai‘i. The Kamehameha School Press. Honolulu. Kame‘eleihiwa, L. 1992 Native Land and Foreign Desires: Pehea La E Pono Ai? Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu. Kelly, M., B. Nakamura, and Dorothy Barrère 1981 A Chronological History, Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawai‘i. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Kelly, M., and S. Athens 1982 Cultural Resources Reconnaissance for the Alenaio Stream Flood Damage Reduction Study, Hilo, Hawai‘i. In Archaeological and Historic Studies for the Alenaio Stream Flood Damage Reduction Study, Hilo, Hawai‘i, by M. Kelly, B. Nakamura, and D. Barrère 1981. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. 38 Kuykenddall, R.S. 1938 The Hawaiian Kingdom. Vol. 1. University of Hawaii Press. Honolulu. 1966 The Hawaiian Kingdom, Volume II: 1854-1874, Twenty Critical Years. University of Hawai‘i Press. Leithead, A.S. 1974 Hilo, Hawaii: It’s Origins and the Pattern of its Growth, 1778-1900. A Senior Honor Thesis Presented to Department of History, University of Hawai‘i, Hilo. Malden, C.R. 1825 Chart of Hilo Bay. In A Chronological History, Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawai‘i, by M. Kelly, B. Nakamura, and D. Barrère 1981. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Maly, K. 1996 Historical Documentary Research and Oral History Interviews: Waiākea Cane Lots (12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, & 21) Land of Waiākea, District of South Hilo, Island of Hawai‘i. Prepared for UHH Ho‘oikaika Club, Paulo Burns, Coordinator c/o History Department University of Hawai‘i - Hilo 96720. 2004 He Moʻolelo ʻĀina: a Cultural Study of the Puʻu Makaʻala Natural Area Reserve Districts of Hilo and Puna, Island of Hawaiʻi. Kumu Pono Associates, LLC Report. SHPD Library, Kapolei. McEldowney, H. 1979 Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design: Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo, Hawai‘i, Department of Anthropology, Bishop Museum. Prepared for the U.S. Army Engineer District, Pacific Ocean. National Geographic, Topo! 2003 Seamless USGS Topographic Maps on CD-ROM, Hawai‘i. National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Washington, D.C. Nelson, J., M. Clark and R Rechtman 2006 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Acquisition of Drainageway Lands Project (TKs:3-2-4-25:48, 50, 53, 59 por., 67 por., 78 por., 80 por., 93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.). Rechtman Consulting, LLC Report RC-0342 prepared for SSFM. Honolulu. Pukui, M.K., S. Elbert and E. Mookini 1976 Place Names of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press. Honolulu. 39 Rechtman, R. 2009 Archaeological Assessment Survey for the Proposed Hilo Bayfront Trails Project, South Hilo District, Pi‘ihonua, Punahoa, Ponahawai, Kūkūau, and Waiākea Ahupua‘a, Island of Hawai‘i. Rechtman Consulting, LLC. Rieth, Timothy M., Terry L. Hunt, Carl Lipo, and Janet M. Wilmshurst 2011 The 13th Century Polynesian Colonization of Hawai‘i Island. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:2740-2749. Rogers, R. 1999 Shipwrecks of Hawai‘i. Pilialoha Publishing, Haleiwa. Rosendahl, M. 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey for EIS, Hilo Judiciary Complex Sites, Hilo, District of South Hilo, Island of Hawai‘i. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. Rosendahl, M., and T. Talea 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey for Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Proposed Irradiation Plant Site, Land of Waiākea, District of South Hilo, Island of Hawai‘i. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. Rosendahl, P. 2004 Archaeological Assessment and Monitoring Plan, Hilo Judiciary Complex Kaiko‘o Mall Site, Land of Waiākea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai‘i [TMK (3) 2-2-015:076]. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. Sato, H., W. Ikeda, R Paeth, R Smythe, and M. Takehiro Jr. 1973 Soil Survey of Island of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Washington D.C. Smith, M., and P. Tourtellotte 1988 Wailoa Bridge Renovation Project, Site 50-10-11115 Burial Removal. DLNR Historic Sites Section, Honolulu. State of Hawaii Department of Accounting and General Services 2019 https://ags.hawaii.gov/survey/map-search/. Stewart, C. 1970 Journal of a Residency in the Sandwich Islands, During the Years 1823, 1824, and 1825. University of Hawai‘i Press. Honolulu. Stokes and Dye 1991 Heiau of the Island of Hawaii: A Historic Survey of Native Hawaiian Temple Sites. Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology. Honolulu. 40 Thrum, T. G. 1907 Heiau and Heiau Sites Throughout the Hawaiian Islands. Hawaiian Almanac and Annual for 1908, pages 38-47. Walker, A., and P. Rosendahl 1996 Archaeological Assessment Study Hilo Judiciary Complex Project. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. Warshauer, K. 2001 Destruction awaited Hilo’s seaport debut. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, December 30, pages 7 and 9, Hilo. 2002a Wailoa Bridge had a long history of trouble. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, May 12, pages 17-18, Hilo. 2002b Hilo’s Wailoa bridge was a costly venture. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, May 12, pages 21-22, Hilo. 2002c Rotating swing bridge survived two tsunamis. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, March 10, 21 and 23, Hilo. 2002d Hilo’s railroad wharf opened in 1903. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, January 6, pages 33 and 35, Hilo. 2003a Hilo Iron Works an early steel success. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, May 18, pages 27-28, Hilo. 2003b Some Banyan Drive Signs Need Correction. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, April 27, 2003, Hilo. 2004b Hilo’s Wailoa River was once a busy waterway. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, February 18 pages F1-2, Hilo. 2005 Orchid Isle Hotel Once Stood on Banyan Drive Lot. Hawai‘i Tribune- Herald, July 25, 2005, Hilo. Wickler, S., and J. Ward 1992 Archaeological and Paleoenvironmental Investigations for Alenaio Stream Flood Control Project, Hilo, Hawai‘i Island. International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., Honolulu. 41 Wilmhurst, J., T. Hunt, C. Lipo, and A. Anderson 2011a High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108:1815-20. 2011b Reply to Mulrrooney et al.: Accepting lower precision radiocarbon dates results in longer colonization chronologies for East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108:E195. Wolfe, E.W., and J. Morris 1994 Geological Map of the Island of Hawai‘i. U.S.G.S. Miscellaneous Investigations Series. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Wolforth, T. 2006 Inventory Survey for the Proposed Reed's Bay Beach Park, Hilo. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu. SCS #2374 CIA-1 A CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR A 0.6447-ACRE PROPERTY IN KŪKŪAU 1ST AHUPUA‘A, SOUTH HILO DISTRICT, HAWAI‘I ISLAND, HAWAI‘I [TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080] Prepared By: Glenn G. Escott, M.A. October 2019 DRAFT Prepared For: Urban Housing Communities, LLC 2000 E. Fourth Street, Suite 205 Santa Ana, CA 92705 1347 Kapi„olani Boulevard, Suite 408 Honolulu, HI 96814 Hawai„i Island Office: PO Box 155 Kea„au, HI 96749 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. i LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ ii LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... ii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 METHODOLOGY ......................................................................................................................... 3 ARCHIVAL RESEARCH .................................................................................................. 4 INTERVIEW METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................... 4 PROJECT AREA NATURAL ENVIRONMENT ............................................................. 6 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS ........................................................................... 6 FISHING PRACTICES .................................................................................................... 19 TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PRACTICES AT HĀLA„I, PU„UHONU, „ŌPE„APE„A, AND KAMALI„I .............................................................................................................. 20 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS ........................................................... 29 RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS ................................................................................................. 36 CULTURAL INFORMANT INTERVIEWS ............................................................................... 39 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 39 CIA INQUIRY RESPONSE ......................................................................................................... 40 CULTURAL ASSESSMEMNT ................................................................................................... 41 REFERENCES CITED ................................................................................................................. 42 APPENDIX A: PUBLIC NOTICES AND AFFIDAVITS .......................................................... A1 ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: 5,500 K-Series Map of Hawai„i Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo!, 2003. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS). .................. 1 Figure 2: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). .......................... 2 Figure 3: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Project Area (County of Hawai„i Planning Department, 2019). .......................................................................................... 3 Figure 4: Aerial Photograph Showing Project Areas, Kea„au, HI, Zone 5 North, 281109 m E, 2181236 m N. (Google Earth, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USGS). ........................................................................................ 1 Figure 5: Portion of 1825 Map of Hilo Bay and Project Area Location (Malden 1825). ............ 11 Figure 6: Portion of 1891 Hilo Property Title Map Showing Project Area Location and Eastern Kūkūau 1st Ahupua„a Land Commission Awards (Baldwin 1891). ............................. 16 Figure 7: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Hāla„i and Pu„u Honu (USGS Hilo Quad, 2013. Source: National Geographic Society). .................... 21 Figure 8: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area (Green Border) and Previous Archaeological Studies (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). .............................................................................................. 30 Figure 9: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Current Housing Project Area Shaded Yellow and Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area Shaded Gray (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006:3). .................................................................................................................... 33 Figure 10: Map Showing Location of Site 25547, Current Housing Project Area Shaded Yellow and Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area Shaded Gray (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006:13). ....................................................................................................................... 34 Figure 11: Site 25547 Plan View Map (Nelson et al. 2006: 14). ................................................. 35 Figure 12: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow and Historic Registered Sites Within One Half Mile Radius (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). ..................................................... 37 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Land Commission Awards in Waiākea Ahupua„a......................................................... 15 Table 2: Previous Archaeological Studies Near the Project Area. .............................................. 31 Table 3: Inventory of Registered Historic Properties Within a 0.5 Mile Search Radius. ............ 38 Table 4: Individuals Responding to CIA. .................................................................................... 39 1 INTRODUCTION Under contract to Urban Housing Communities, LLC, Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted a Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA) for the lands of TMK: (3) 2-4-025: 048, 053 and 080 located in Kūkūau 1st Ahupua„a, South Hilo District, Hawai„i Island (Figure 1 through Figure 4). The 5.049-acre project area is located approximately one kilometer southwest the coast of Hilo Bay Front and is bordered Kūkūau Street to the west and by Kapi„olani Street to the north. The south and east property boundaries are bordered by undeveloped residential lots. The project area is currently undeveloped. The project area property is owned by Giampaolo Boschetti. Urban Housing Communities, LLC is applying for grubbing and grading permits for the proposed construction of residential homes on TMK: (3) 2-4-025: 048, 053 and 080. Urban Housing Communities, LLC is managing the proposed construction of residential homes on the project area. The point of contact is Mr. James Rock at Urban Housing Communities, LLC. Mr. Rock‟s mailing address is 2000 E. Fourth Street, Suite 205 Santa Ana, CA 92705. Mr. Rock can be contacted by email at jrock@uhcllc.net or by telephone 714-835-3955 x108. The Constitution of the State of Hawai„i clearly states the duty of the State and its agencies is to preserve, protect, and prevent interference with the traditional and customary rights of native Hawaiians. Article XII, Section 7 requires the State to “protect all rights, customarily and traditionally exercised for subsistence, cultural and religious purposes and possessed by ahupua‘a tenants who are descendants of native Hawaiians who inhabited the Hawaiian Islands prior to 1778” (2000). In spite of the establishment of the foreign concept of private ownership and western-style government, Kamehameha III (Kauikeaouli) preserved the people's traditional right to subsistence. As a result, in 1850 the Hawaiian Government confirmed the traditional access rights to native Hawaiian ahupua‘a tenants to gather specific natural resources for customary uses from undeveloped private property and waterways under the Hawai„i Revised Statutes (HRS) 7-1. In 1992, the State of Hawai„i Supreme Court, reaffirmed HRS 7-1 and expanded it to include, “native Hawaiian rights…may extend beyond the ahupua‘a in which a native Hawaiian resides where such rights have been customarily and traditionally exercised in this manner” (Pele Defense Fund v. Paty, 73 Haw.578, 1992). 1 Figure 1: 5,500 K-Series Map of Hawai‘i Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo!, 2003. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS). 2 Figure 2: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). 3 Figure 3: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Project Area (County of Hawai‘i Planning Department, 2019). 1 Figure 4: Aerial Photograph Showing Project Areas, Kea‘au, HI, Zone 5 North, 281109 m E, 2181236 m N. (Google Earth, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USGS). 2 Act 50, enacted by the Legislature of the State of Hawaii (2000) with House Bill 2895, relating to Environmental Impact Statements, proposes that: …there is a need to clarify that the preparation of environmental assessments or environmental impact statements should identify and address effects on Hawai„i‟s culture, and traditional and customary rights… [H.B. NO. 2895]. Act 50 requires state agencies and other developers to assess the effects of proposed land use or shoreline developments on the “cultural practices of the community and State” as part of the HRS Chapter 343 environmental review process (2001). Its purpose has broadened, “to promote and protect cultural beliefs, practices and resources of native Hawaiians [and] other ethnic groups, and it also amends the definition of „significant effect‟ to be re-defined as “the sum of effects on the quality of the environment including actions that are…contrary to the State‟s environmental policies…or adversely affect the economic welfare, social welfare, or cultural practices of the community and State” (H.B. 2895, Act 50, 2000). Thus, Act 50 requires an assessment of cultural practices to be included in the Environmental Assessments and the Environmental Impact Statements, and to be taken into consideration during the planning process. The concept of geographical expansion is recognized by using, as an example, “the broad geographical area, e.g. district or ahupua‘a” (OEQC 1997). It was decided that the process should identify „anthropological‟ cultural practices, rather than „social‟ cultural practices. For example, limu (edible seaweed) gathering would be considered an anthropological cultural practice, while a modern-day marathon would be considered a social cultural practice. According to the Guidelines for Assessing Cultural Impacts established by the Hawaii State Office of Environmental Quality Control: The types of cultural practices and beliefs subject to assessment may include subsistence, commercial, residential, agricultural, access-related, recreational, and religious and spiritual customs. The types of cultural resources subject to assessment may include traditional cultural properties or other types of historic sites, both manmade and natural, which support such cultural beliefs (OEQC 1997). 3 This Cultural Impact Assessment involves evaluating the probability of impacts on identified cultural resources, including values, rights, beliefs, objects, records, properties, and stories occurring within the project area and its vicinity (H.B. 2895, Act 50, 2000). METHODOLOGY This Cultural Impact Assessment was prepared in accordance with the methodology and content protocol provided in the Guidelines for Assessing Cultural Impacts (OEQC 1997). In outlining the “Cultural Impact Assessment Methodology”, the OEQC states: …information may be obtained through scoping, community meetings, ethnographic interviews and oral histories… (1997). The report contains archival and documentary research, as well as communication with organizations having knowledge of the project area, its cultural resources, and its practices and beliefs. This Cultural Impact Assessment was prepared in accordance with the methodology and content protocol provided in the Guidelines for Assessing Cultural Impacts (OEQC 1997). The assessment concerning cultural impacts should address, but not be limited to, the following matters: (1) a discussion of the methods applied and results of consultation with individuals and organizations identified by the preparer as being familiar with cultural practices and features associated with the project area, including any constraints of limitations with might have affected the quality of the information obtained; (2) a description of methods adopted by the preparer to identify, locate, and select the persons interviewed, including a discussion of the level of effort undertaken; (3) ethnographic and oral history interview procedures, including the circumstances under which the interviews were conducted, and any constraints or limitations which might have affected the quality of the information obtained; (4) biographical information concerning the individuals and organizations consulted, their particular expertise, and their historical and genealogical relationship to the project area, as well as information concerning the persons submitting information or interviewed, their particular knowledge and cultural expertise, if any, and their historical and genealogical relationship to the project area; (5) a discussion concerning historical and cultural source materials consulted, the institutions and repositories searched, and the level of effort undertaken, as well as the particular perspective of the authors, if appropriate, any opposing views, 4 and any other relevant constraints, limitations or biases; (6) a discussion concerning the cultural resources, practices and beliefs identified, and for the resources and practices, their location within the broad geographical area in which the proposed action is located, as well as their direct or indirect significance or connection to the project site; (7) a discussion concerning the nature of the cultural practices and beliefs, and the significance of the cultural resources within the project area, affected directly or indirectly by the proposed project; (8) an explanation of confidential information that has been withheld from public disclosure in the assessment; (9) a discussion concerning any conflicting information in regard to identified cultural resources, practices and beliefs; (10) an analysis of the potential effect of any proposed physical alteration on cultural resources, practices or beliefs; the potential of the proposed action to isolate cultural resources, practices or beliefs from their setting; and the potential of the proposed action to introduce elements which may alter the setting in which cultural practices take place, and; (11) the inclusion of bibliography of references, and attached records of interviews, which were allowed to be disclosed. Based on the inclusion of the above information, assessments of the potential effects on cultural resources in the project area and recommendations for mitigation of these effects can be proposed. ARCHIVAL RESEARCH Archival research focused on a historical documentary study involving both published and unpublished sources. These included legendary accounts of native and early foreign writers; early historical journals and narratives; historic maps and land records such as Land Commission Awards, Royal Patent Grants, and Boundary Commission records; historic accounts, and previous archaeological project reports. INTERVIEW METHODOLOGY Interviews are conducted in accordance with applicable state laws and guidelines. Individuals and/or groups who have knowledge of traditional practices and beliefs associated with a project area or who know of historical properties within a project area are sought for consultation. Individuals who have particular knowledge of traditions passed down from preceding generations and a personal familiarity with the 5 project area are invited to share their relevant information. Often people are recommended for their expertise, and indeed, organizations, such as Hawaiian Civic Clubs, the Island Branch of Office of Hawaiian Affairs, historical societies, Island Trail clubs, and Planning Commissions are depended upon for their recommendations of suitable informants. These groups are invited to contribute their input, and suggest further avenues of inquiry, as well as specific individuals to interview. If knowledgeable individuals are identified, personal interviews are sometimes taped and then transcribed. These draft transcripts are returned to each of the participants for their review and comments. After corrections are made, each individual signs a release form, making the information available for this study. When telephone interviews occur, a summary of the information is often sent for correction and approval, or dictated by the informant and then incorporated into the document. Key topics discussed with the interviewees vary from project to project, but usually include: personal association to the ahupua‘a, land use in the project‟s vicinity; knowledge of traditional trails, gathering areas, water sources, religious sites; place names and their meanings; stories that were handed down concerning special places or events in the vicinity of the project area; evidence of previous activities identified while in the project vicinity. In this case, letters with maps and descriptions the project area were sent to individuals and organizations whose jurisdiction includes knowledge of the area with an invitation for consultation. Consultation was sought from Kamaile Puluole-Mitchell, Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) East Hawai„i Island Representative; Jordan Kea Calpito, SHPD Burial Sites Specialist; Sean Naleimaile, State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) Hawai„i Island Archaeologist; and Kalena Blakemore, Hawai„i Island Burial Council (HIBC) Member. If cultural resources are identified based on the information received from these organizations and/or additional informants, an assessment of the potential effects on the identified cultural resources in the project area and recommendations for mitigation of these effects can be proposed. Public notices (Appendix A) were placed in the September 2019 issue of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) Ka Wai Ola Newspaper. Public notices were also published in the Honolulu Star- Advertiser, and the Hawai„i Tribune Herald on August 14th, 15th, and 18th. 6 PROJECT AREA NATURAL ENVIRONMENT The project area is situated on level to moderately sloping land at 95 feet (29 meters) above mean sea level (amsl). The project area substrate is a Mauna Loa lava flow dated between 750 and 1,500 years ago (Wolfe and Morris 1996). Soil in the project area is Keaukaha Series (rKFD) extremely rocky muck overlaying pāhoehoe lava (Sato 1973:27). The soil is thin and well drained with 6% to 20% slopes. Annual rainfall ranges from 120 to 160 inches and drains toward the east. There is a narrow drainage area that bisects the middle of the property. Plant communities in the project are dominated by trees, grasses, ferns, and bushes. Tree species include gunpowder (Trema orientalis), autograph (Clusia rosea), banyan (Ficus sp.), guava (Psidium sp.), and bingabing (Macaranga mappa). HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS Many archaeologists believe that Hawai„i Island was first settled around A.D. 1,000 by people sailing from the Marquesas (Athens et al. 2014; Dye 2011; Kahn et al. 2014; Kirch 2011; Kirch and McCoy 2007; Mulrooney et al. 2011; Reith et al. 2011; Wilmhurst et al. 2011a and 2011b). An article published in the Journal of Archaeological Science reviewing radiocarbon dates recovered at archaeological sites on the Island of Hawai„i suggests that, by relying on only carbon samples from short-lived plant remains, the most reliable dates point to initial Polynesian colonization of Hawai„i Island occurring between A.D. 1220 and 1261 (Rieth et al. 2011:2747). Hilo was, by most estimates, one of the first settlements on the Island of Hawai„i. Early settlers established settlements on the windward shores in likely places such as Waipi„o, Waimanu, and Hilo Bay. People at these locations were able to sustain themselves through inshore and pelagic fishing, gathering shellfish from the shore and strand, plant and animal husbandry, and the utilization of natural terrestrial flora and fauna (Kirch and Kelly 1975; Pearson et al. 1971; Kirch 1985). The rich marine resources of Hilo Bay and the gently sloping forests of Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea provided abundant resources. Fresh water was available from the Wailoa and Wailuku rivers and smaller streams such as Waiākea, Waiolama, Pukihae, and „Alenaio. Settlement is thought to have consisted of widely spaced, permanent homes that gradually expanded to form a nearly continuous zone of settlement. 7 PRE-CONTACT ACCOUNTS OF HILO Hilo is likely one of the first two main settlement areas on the island (Kirch 1985), due to its calm and sizable bay, permanent supply of fresh water and fertile and arable soils near the bay. Indeed, one of the early Polynesian travelers to Hawai„i was named Hiro, or Hilo (Beckwith 1970; Henry 1995), and the attachment of his namesakes to this place supplies some circumstantial evidence to the early occupation here. The coming of Pa„ao to Hawai„i is commemorated in a legend associated with Hilo. Pa„ao is said to have made his first home in Hawai„i on a rock at the mouth of the Wailuku River (Reed 1987; Westervelt 1977). The subsequent history retained through oral history over the centuries is anchored on the events, often romantic and violent, of the struggle for power. Pa„ao affected the overthrown of the ancient lineages of power and supplanted them with the new Pili line by intrigues and warfare in Hilo (Westervelt 1977). There is another story associated with Hilo that relates directly to the struggle between the old lineages of authority (Nanaula) versus the new ones represented by Pa„ao and Pili. Kaupe„epe„e, from the older Nanaula line, resisted the authority of the newcomers (Kalākaua 1990:84). He traveled to Hilo and captured a chiefess from her home in Hilo Bay, and returned to Moloka„i. A series of phenomenal battles transpired at his Moloka„i fortress, leading eventually to the return of the chiefess to her home (Beckwith 1970:464-466; Fornander 1996: 32; Pukui et al. 1974:42). This set of legendary events emphasizes the place of power that Hilo had during this pivotal time in Hawaiian history. The chronology of developments in Hilo is portrayed in the oral traditions that were written down in the 19th century regarding struggles for power. Chiefs from Hilo and Puna banded together to raid O„ahu. They were slaughtered in Kipapa Gulch in „Ewa, where "the head of Hilo was cut off and carried in triumph to Honouliuli, and stuck up at a place still called Poo-Hilo” (Fornander 1996:90). That did not deter Kulukulua, a subsequent Hilo chief, from successfully attacking O„ahu forces to retrieve a loved one (Elbert 1959:288-290). Not long after that, „Umi spent time in Hilo soon after becoming ruler of the island, and before he was widely recognized as such. A lack of understanding with the Hilo chief Kulukulua was the purported reason for his attacking Hilo, but his subsequent actions, that of traveling around the island with his forces, indicates that „Umi 8 merely started his campaign of asserting his military authority over the entire island at the important seat of power of Hilo (Kamakau 1961:17). The chiefs of Hilo fought those from Kona for “several centuries” (Kamakau 1961:62). “It is said that the cause which started the war between the chiefs of Hilo and Kona was the cruel treatment of Kua„ana, chief of Hilo, by the chiefs of Kona. He was the son of „I…” (Kamakau 1961:62). Sometimes the victory went to the chiefs of Kona, but more often to the chiefs of Hilo. Locations of these battles are not disclosed in the written histories. Hilo played a prominent role in the long campaign of conquest of the islands by Kamehameha. The first major battle campaign after the ascendance of Kamehameha at Moku„ōhai took place at Hilo, and is referred to as the Battle of the Bitter Rains. Kamehameha went by land from Kona to Hilo, and descended upon Keawema„uhili at Pū„āinakō for three days of battle. Forces from Maui in support of Keawema„uhili joined in the battle, and armies fought over the uplands and shoreline of Hilo for three more days. “Kamehameha‟s forces were badly used in these battles. Ka- lani-malokulolu-i-ke-po„o-ka-lani was almost killed at Hala„i. The army was saved only by getting to the sea and going aboard Ke„e-au-moku‟s fleet” (Kamakau 1961:125). Years later, Keawema„uhili became an ally of Kamehameha. While Kamehameha was battling for control over Maui, Kamehameha's Hawai„i island nemesis, Keōuakū„ahu„ula, made a decisive move on Hilo. When Keouakuahuula heard of the assistance in men and canoes which Keawemauhili of Hilo had furnished to Kamehameha on his expedition to Maui, he was greatly irritated, and considered it as a breach of the agreement between them to jointly oppose Kamehameha’s pretensions to sovereignty. To punish, therefore, his former ally, Keoua invaded Hilo. A battle was fought at Alae in Hilo-paliku, in which Keawemauhili was killed, and Keoua added the district of Hilo to his own possessions of Puna and Kau [Fornander 1996:240]. After another series of later battles in Hamakua between Kamehameha and Keōua, "Keoua retired to Hilo; Kamehameha went back to Waipi„o and Kohala” (Kamakau 1961:151-152). Keōua “stayed at Pi„opi„o for two days and on the third day 9 he returned to Puna. From Puna he announced that he was the mō‘i of all of Hawai„i Kuauli…” (Desha 2000:271). It was immediately following this episode that a significant portion of Keōua‟s forces were destroyed by rock and ash spewing from the volcano Kilauea during their trek to Ka„ū. Kamehameha selected Hilo as his base of operations in preparation for launching an attack on O„ahu and the western islands. Upon one trip to Hilo "(i)t is thought that there were as many as seven mano [twenty eight thousand] people who gathered at the shore at Kaipalaoa when the ali‘i landed in their regal garments" (Desha 2000:369). Kamehameha developed a rapport with Vancouver. During one of Vancouver's visits to Hilo "he sent Lieutenant Puget ashore with a red British flag on a wooden staff to wave in the breezes of Hilo. By that flag, the island of Hawai„i was to escape being troubled by other governmental powers" (Desha 2000:379). Even after Kamehameha was successful in subduing O„ahu at the battle of Nu„uanu, events in Hilo required his attention. A tabu chief from Maui named Namakeha„ fomented rebellion in the eastern half of the island of Hawai„i while Kamehameha was in O„ahu. Kamehameha returned to Hawaii to make war on Na-makeha„ and his followers. The battle took place at Hilo. Na-makeha„ was defeated, fled, and hid in the bush until he was captured. He was made a mock of by his enemies, and in January, 1797, with the consent of Kamehameha, he was offered in sacrifice to the gods in the heiau of Kaipalaoa in Pi„ihonua, Hilo…This was the last of the battles fought by Kamehameha to unite the islands [Kamakau 1961:174]. The last battle that Kamehameha ever fought was in Hilo. Hilo continued to be place of power after the death of Kamehameha and after the breaking of the kapu. Kalākaua had a residence in Hilo, as did Governess Ruth Ke„eilikolani (Zambucka 1992). Kamehameha III visited in 1829 and 1830 (Kelly et al. 1981). Governor Kuakini had a mill in Ponahawai. Several of the ahupua‘a fronting Hilo Bay were personal lands of Kamehameha I (Kelly et al. 1981:40). Waiākea, which had been retained as a personal land by Kamehameha I … was at some later time held by the chiefess Ka-unu-o-hua, a granddaughter of Keawe-mau-hili … She surrendered it in the Māhele of 1848 and it became a Crown Land (Indices … 1929:26) (Kelly et al. 1981:40). 10 The Maka‘āinana Rulers and would-be rulers would come and go, but the maka‘āinana, the common folk, lived on and farmed the land and fished for generations in the Hilo area. The settlement in Hilo Bay was concentrated in the eastern portion of the shoreline, with perhaps 2,000 people living in 400 houses there in 1823 (Ellis 1917:253, cited in Kelly et al. 1981:19). Other habitations were distributed throughout the coastline well beyond the east and west limits of the bay. The map from Byron depicts the position of the shoreline further to the west than it is today (Figure 5). The larger heiau were concentrated on the western portion of Hilo Bay (Stokes 1991). This may suggest a segregation between ceremonial and mundane precincts in the Hilo region, with the former being concentrated at the mouth of the Wailuku and the latter at the mouth of the Wailoa River. Heiau were also located along the Waiākea coast. These were smaller, or perhaps not as ceremonially prominent, and consequently went unreported to Stokes. One is on the east coast of Reed‟s Bay (Kam 1983), and this is the only heiau in the Hilo vicinity that still has observable architecture. Another heiau once existed at Leleiwi point to the east of the project area. This heiau was a "fish heiau (heiau ho‘oulu i‘a), named Pū-hala (pandanas tree)" (Pukui et al. 1974:131). There is a local variant of the popular legend regarding the growth of a plant from a person after their burial, particularly as it relates to sustaining a starving population (Beckwith 1970:98). A man named „Ulu lived in Waiākea. He died of famine. Priests directed that his body be buried near a running stream, and an ‘ulu tree sprouted at that location the next day. The fruits of that tree saved the people from further starvation. Fishponds for the Ali‘i and the Maka‘āinana Kikuchi (1973) recognized the variations and complexities of fishpond design, and devised a classificatory system that recognizes 7 variants of loko kuapā, 3 variants of loko pu‘uone, 4 variants of loko wai, 1 loko i‘a kalo, 12 variants of loko ‘ume‘iki, 2 variants of kaheka, and 2 variants of kahē paniwai (Kikuchi 1973:227-232). Royal fishponds are situated northeast of the project area (see Figure 5). 11 Figure 5: Portion of 1825 Map of Hilo Bay and Project Area Location (Malden 1825). 12 Loko kuapā were controlled by the ali‘i, and built by the local inhabitants (Summers 1964). Mullet (‘ama‘ama) and milkfish (awa) were the most common fish kept in this type of pond, in part, because their food (microbenthos) grew best in brackish water. Other fish raised and kept in ponds are awa‘aua, kaku, aholehole, ‘o‘opu, ‘opae and puhi (Summers 1964; Titcomb 1952). Pond caretakers could eat these as they wished, but “those kinds reserved for the chiefs they would eat secretly” (Kamakau, cited in Summers 1964:11). Ponds were built at least as early as the 1400s (Summers 1964:12), and probably many were built earlier than that. One fishpond on the West Loch of Pearl Harbor has been securely dated with radiocarbon assay to circa 1000 AD (Wolforth et al. 1997). Royal fishponds were located in the western boundary of Waiākea (Kamakau 1961:152) with fish from these ponds being reserved for the ali‘i. These ponds were said to be favorites of Hi„iaka and Pele. This was invoked as one possible explanation for the volcanic eruption that decimated Keōua's marching army across Kilauea. Keōua had apparently not treated the Waiolama ponds with their due respect as he was passing through after a battle against chief Kamehameha (Desha 2000). In 1823 Ellis observed small huts alongside the Waiākea ponds for the pond caretakers. In addition, it "was custom to build small watch houses from which to guard the fish from being stolen at high tide, of from being killed by pigs and dogs; when the tides receded the fish would return to the middle of the pond out of reach of thieves" (Kamakau 1976:48). In addition to the royal ponds, there were pu‘uone ponds that belonged to the commoners, and other non-royal inhabitants (Kamakau 1976:49). The pu‘uone ponds near the sea (loko kai pu‘uone) were much desired by farmers, and these ponds they stocked (ho‘oholo) with fish. Pu‘uone ponds were close to shore ponds, loko kuapo, or to the seashore, and next to the mouths (nuku) of streams. The farmer cleared away the mokae sedges, ‘aka‘akai bulrushes, and the weeds, and deepened the pond, piling up the muck on the sides, until he had a clean pond. Then he stocked it with awa and fish fry, pua i‘a - two or three gourds full - until the pond was full of fish [Kamakau 1976:49]. 13 There were at least two shore ponds within the bay area at Hilo, but no early information on them has been found. These ponds, Waihonu and Kanakea, were natural indentations of the shoreline and required little in the way of rock walls that characterize the typical shore ponds (Kamakau 1976:47-48: Summers 1964:2-12). Ponds such as these were called loko i‘a, and were used for storing excess fish rather than for fish culture (Summers 1964:I) [Kelly et al. 1981:15]. Kamakau refers to the shore ponds as loko kuapa. He uses loko i‘a as the generic term for all types of fishponds (Kamakau 1976:47-49). There are approximately 10 other fishponds to the east of Hilo along the Keaukaha shoreline (Kikuchi 1973: 34). One, the large pond named Lokowaka, is associated with the mo‘o Waka (Kikuchi 1973:262). "Waka, a mo‘o, dived into the pool to escape Pele who was jealous of Waka's interest in a man" (Pukui et al. 1974:134). The project area is southwest of the royal fishpond called Pi„opi„o, “a place of residence of chiefs from ancient times” (Desha 2000:76) (see Figure 5). There is one historical development that involves three generations of island mō‘ī at Pi„opi„o. While the young Kamehameha was staying there in 1752 with the current mō‘ī Alapa„inui, Kalaniopu„u attempted, and failed, to abduct Kamehameha. This precipitated an attack on the warriors of Kalaniopu„u at Kalepolepo “by Alapai‟s men, who had followed Kalaniopu„u from Hilo. First the warriors from the lowland gained, then those from the upland, until night fell and the battle was postponed until the next day” (I„i 1959:3). Later when Kalaniopu„u became the island ruler, he had a house in Pi„opi„o, and that is where he died (Fornander 1996:142, 201). Pi„opi„o was under ali‘i control for centuries prior to modern land ownership codes and regulations were implemented in Hawai„i during the Māhele in the middle 1800s. The land between the royal fishponds and the ocean (the project area) was given to Victoria Kamamalu during the Māhele. Victoria Kamamalu, then, was granddaughter of Kamehameha I. Her brothers by same parents (Kina„u and Kekuanao„a) were Alexander Liholiho (who became Kamehameha IV), and Lot (who became Kamehameha V). 14 EARLY HISTORIC ACCOUNTS OF HILO Early accounts of settlements along the windward shores describe the area as divided into several distinct environmental regions (Ellis 1963: 291-292). At Hilo Bay, from the coast to a distance of five or six miles inland, scattered subsistence agriculture was evident, followed by a region of tall fern and bracken, flanked at higher elevations by a forest region between 10 and 20 miles wide, beyond which was an expanse of grass and lava (Ellis 1963:403). A map of Hilo Bay drawn by Malden in 1825 shows an area of agricultural fields inland of the bay (see Figure 4). The American Missionary C.S. Stewart wrote in 1825, “the first four miles of the country is open and uneven, and beautifully sprinkled with clumps, groves, and single trees of the bread-fruit, pandanus, and candle tree” (Stewart 1970:361-363). The majority of inhabitants in 1825 lived within this coastal region. Taro, plantains, bananas, coconuts, sweet potatoes, and breadfruit were grown individually or in small garden plots. Fish, pig, dog, and birds were also raised and captured for consumption. Wood, such as „ōhi‘a and koa for house construction, canoe building, and fires was obtained from the upland agricultural zone (McEldowney 1979:18-19), and from the dense forests above (Ellis 1963:236). Hilo quickly became a port of call for both whalers and merchant ships. It also became a point of entry for missionaries and travelers. Wooden homes and businesses began to pop up in the area along Hilo Bay amidst the traditional homes and agricultural fields. For their part in aiding King Kamehameha, he gave John Young the ahupua‘a of Kūkūau 1 and he gave the ahupua‘a of Kūkūau 2 to Isaac Davis (Kelly et al. 1981:11). THE MĀHELE OF 1848 AND LAND COMMISSION AWARDS With the Māhele of 1848 and the two Acts of 1850, authorizing the sale of land in fee simple to resident aliens and the award of kuleana lands to native tenants, land tenure in Hawai„i arrived at a significant turning point (Chinen 1961:13). Prior to the Māhele, Kūkūau 1st Ahupua„a belonged to King Kamehameha and were Crown Lands during the Māhele of 1848. John Young‟s son Keoni Ana was awarded 9,360 acres of land within Kūkūau 1st as Land Commission award (LCA) 8515. Nine smaller LCAs were awarded within Kūkūau 1st Ahupua„a (Table 1 and Figure 6). 15 Table 1: Land Commission Awards in Waiākea Ahupua„a. Award To LCA Description Papa 00513 2 houses Puniono 02606 0.93 acres, 2 house lots & 1 cultivated plot Kahue 02663 3.75 acres Kahue 02664 0.34 acres Aiko 03205 2 lots: 0.55 acres and 0.46 acres Haoleopunui 03206 2.48 acres Hoomoo 03993 2.06 acres, 1 house Ana 08815 9,360 acres Kanakaole 11045B 3 houses Ouluihi, wahine 11144 1 „apana The Land Commission awards were small in area, between 0.34 and 3.75 acres, and the majority of awards were made to native claimants. Most of the awards are makai (east) of the current project area. The project area parcel is not associated with any LCA. The LCAs closest LCAs were awarded in Kūkūau 1st Ahupua„a and Waiākea Ahupua„a, just south of the current project area (see Figure 6). From testimony given by LCA claimants, it is clear that the awards included house lots and agricultural lots under cultivation. The only references to cultigens given in the testimonies are hala (Pandanus tectorius) and kalo (Colocasia esculenta). There are also references to uncultivated “wastelands” of pāhoehoe lava in the region of the project area lands. CHANGING RESIDENTIAL AND LAND-USE PATTERNS (1845-1865) Between 1845 and 1865 traditional land-use and residential patterns underwent a dramatic change. In particular, the regular use of Hilo Bay by foreign vessels, the whaling industry, the establishment of missions in the Hilo area, the introduction of the sandalwood trade, the legalization of private land ownership, the introduction of cattle ranching, and the introduction of sugar cane cultivation all brought about changes in settlement patterns and long-established land-use patterns (Kelly et al. 1981). Hilo became the center of population and settlements in outlying regions declined or disappeared. The area of Hilo continued to develop as a commercial port throughout the twentieth century. Hilo Bay Front area became a store front venue, while the outlying regions were developed as industrial parks, shopping malls, and residential neighborhoods. 16 Figure 6: Portion of 1891 Hilo Property Title Map Showing Project Area Location and Eastern Kūkūau 1st Ahupua„a Land Commission Awards (Baldwin 1891). 17 The historical events at Hilo have received significant attention and presentation elsewhere (Desha 2000; Kelly et al. 1981; George 1948; Leithead 1974). Those events and trends that do or may relate generally to the project area are synthesized below. Sandalwood was being shipped out of Hilo Bay in the first 20 years of the 19th century (Kelly et al. 1981:25). In April of 1822, the first missionary, Auna, a Tahitian, preached in Hilo. Many other missionaries soon followed. Whaling ships are documented as docking at Hilo by at least 1824. Whaling declined precipitously in the mid 1800s due to depredations by the U.S. Confederate fleet, increased use worldwide of kerosene, and increased cost of outfitting, among other things (George 1948:32). Whaling hobbled on in the islands, and the wreck of the Tamerlane in 1892 marks the end of commercial whaling in the area (Rogers 1999). Due to economic, cultural and natural forces, the focus of habitation had fully shifted from the Wailoa River side of Hilo Bay to the Wailuku River side of the bay by 1885. “Hilo in 1885 was a small settlement with only a few hundred inhabitants. Waiākea had no frame buildings, just a few grass homes (after the tidal wave of 1877)” (Leithead 1974:59). The industrial and commercial concerns began to expand in the Wailoa River vicinity. Markets, landings, agriculture, and milling soon flourished in the Waiākea side of the bay (Kelly et al. 1981; Leithead 1974). Habitation then increased in the Waiākea area on the heels of the industrial developments in the late 1800s and early 1900s. By 1901 sugar dominated the island‟s industry, and Hilo was the epicenter of production and export. Railroads connected sugar factors along the Hāmākua and Puna coasts to the mills and wharves at Hilo. An important spur of the railroad line connected the switch yard to the wharf. The first pier at Kuhio Wharf was built between 1912 and 1916 (Kelly et al. 1981:194). A second was added in 1923. The railroad began operation in the Hilo area in 1899, and was abandoned in 1946 (Kelly et al. 1981). The first railroad to wharf connection was at the mouth of the Wailoa River. Railroad and sugar expansion coincided with one another, although not always productively (Kelly et al. 1981:154). The tsunami of 1946 struck Hilo Bay just as one train was passing through the project area. 18 The Alenaio canal was created to facilitate the filling of the lowlands near the ocean that had once been fishponds and taro fields just to the west and beyond the project area. It was upgraded with stone walls in 1917 (Kelly et al. 1981:220). Black sand from the beach was pumped up into the Waiolama swamps to fill them (Kelly et al. 1981:223). Removing beach sand to Waiolama swamp partially undermined the railroad. When the sand dredging started for the nearby Ponahawai taro and pond filling, the railroad company complained, and the dredging stopped (Kelly et al. 1981:224). Dredging started up again in 1922, and 31,763 cubic yards of black sand was then taken from the shoreline and placed in the Ponahawai drainage (Kelly et al. 1981:225). “Altogether, between the years 1917 to 1923, a total or roughly 250,000 cubic yards of fine black-lava sand from the beach at Hilo Bay was pumped…” into the interior wetlands (Kelly et al. 1981:225). With the growth in industry and population in the latter half of the 1800s, the Minister of the Interior of the Provisional Government focused attention on the Waiākea side of the bay for the development of a new wharf (Kelly et al. 1981:104). While the Isbell Point wharf continued to be used in the 1890s, the government began building a “boat landing” just south of Kalauiiokukui in 1897 (Kelly et al. 1981:105). “Difficulties in obtaining a lease for this location, delayed the start of construction until October 1897, when a lease agreement was reached” (Kelly et al. 1981:105). But this boat landing turned out to be inadequate, and was then leased to Hackfeld & Co. for use as warehouse and landing (Kelly et al. 1981:107). The “boat landing” is identified as being immediately adjacent and to the south of Kalauiiokukui point on a U.S. Engineer Office map dated July 16, 1920 (in Kelly et al. 1981:201, Figure 84). The government initiated construction in 1897 of a larger wharf just north of Reed‟s Landing known as the Government Ship Wharf (Kelly et al. 1981:107). Soon thereafter plans were made to increase the size of the wharf (Kelly et al. 1981:178), but efforts quickly changed to construction of the “railroad wharf” just to the south (over old Reed‟s Landing). The railroad wharf was completed in 1893, and after that this “new railroad wharf accommodated all vessels coming into Hilo Harbor” (Kelly et al. 1981:178). During this period larger steam vessels with deeper drafts were rapidly replacing sailing ships. Many large steam ships could not be accommodated by the railroad wharf. 19 By 1909 the only workable wharves were the railroad wharf and the territorial wharf [the Government Wharf], which was in “a condition of decay and beyond repair” (Kelly et al. 1981:184). And by this time the breakwater at Hilo Bay was under construction. The old government wharf was finally removed in February, 1912 (Kelly et al. 1981:185). Simultaneously, a considerable effort was expended to building a new wharf that would eventually become known as Kuhio Wharf. By 1916 Kuhio Wharf was busy to capacity. Buildings Hilo Iron Works building and railroad spur was built and began operations in 1913 (Warshauer 2003:28). Two acres of “swamp land” was sucked up from the Wailoa River into molds to pour concrete as foundations for expanding the Iron Works in 1919. The building that still stands today (just beyond the project area) was built in 1935. The foundry at the Iron Works closed in 1958. Other fabrication continued there until finally closing completely in 1983. FISHING PRACTICES Ellis‟ descriptions of the people he met and the villages he travelled through along the Puna coast in 1823 illustrate the long and well developed Hawaiian traditions of fishing and collecting food from the ocean. This orientation to the coast and the traditional practices developed in Hawai„i are still passed down generation to generation and persist today (Maly and Maly 2004). Many fishermen, whether they use a hand-line or rod and reel, use knowledge and techniques of past fishermen to select fishing locations, proper bait, and technique. Fishermen throw net, fish by rod and reel, or spear fish at different locations along the shoreline to catch specific fish such as āholehole, ‘āweoweo, kala, kole, kūmū, manini, mamo, moana, moi, mū, palani, ta‘ape, uhu, ‘ū‘ū, uouoa, weke‘ā, and weke‘ula. Many people still fish with rod and along the shore at Hilo Bay, or fish by boat offshore for akule, kawele‘ā, mahimahi, ono, ‘ōpakapaka, ‘ula‘ula, and other species. In addition, the traditional collection of ‘ōpihi, ‘a‘ama, and limu along the rocky shoreline is still practiced. Traditional Hawaiian fishing practices, shoreline gathering practices, and ocean access are protected by state law. 20 Traditional Cultural Practices at Hilo Bay Fishing, canoeing surfing are recognized past and ongoing cultural activities practiced along the coast at Hilo Bay. These coastal cultural practices are still conducted today at various spots along Hilo Bay Front and are protected by law. Considering all of the historical documentation, previous archaeology, past discussions with the public, and previous interviews conducted regarding Hilo Bay, fishing and canoeing can be considered as cultural practices conducted roughly one kilometer northeast of the current project area. Fishermen and Canoers have used this area into pre-Contact times. Other old style recreational activities conducted here include surfing, and the games of kilu, pahenehene, and others associated with lōkū. Those activities are documented to have been conducted here for a long time prior to European contact. Although the latter traditional games are no longer practiced, and have not been practiced here for some time, fishing and canoeing are still conducted. TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PRACTICES AT HĀLA‘I, PU‘UHONU, ‘ŌPE‘APE‘A, AND KAMALI‘I There is a collection of traditional Hawaiian legends that are set on the three hills in Ponahawai and Punahoa Ahupua„a (Figure 7). Hāla„i hill is the largest, is furthest makai, and is approximately 0.75 kilometers southwest of the current project area. The middle hill and the mauka hill have been referred to in legend as Pu„uhonu, „Ōpe„ape„a, and Pu„u o Kamali„i. The confusion in the names of the latter two hills continued into the early post-Contact era when cartographers gave these two cinder cones different names on their maps. Furthermore, the middle hill was excavated from the mid 1940s through the 1960s for cinder to supply various construction projects. Modern maps depict the large hill to the northeast as Hāla„i, the small hill to the southwest as Pu„uhonu, and the middle hill is no longer present (see Figure 7). The best treatment of the legends surrounding the three hills can be found in a study of the oral traditions and archival records of Ponahawai and Punahoa Ahupua„a written by Kepa and Onaona Maly (Maly and Maly 2003:14-19). Their work relied heavily on that of W.D. Westervelt (1910, reprinted in 1987) who published a collection of traditional stories about the goddesses called Hina and the demi-god Maui. 21 Figure 7: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Hāla„i and Pu„u Honu (USGS Hilo Quad, 2013. Source: National Geographic Society). 22 Regarding the traditions of Hina and the Hāla„i Hills, Westervelt (reprinted in 1987) wrote: Ghosts of the Hilo Hills The Legends about Hina and her famous son Maui, and her less widely known daughters, are common property among the natives of the beautiful little city of Hilo. One of these legends of more than ordinary interest finds its location in the three small hills back of Hilo toward the mountains. These hills are small craters connected with some ancient lava flow of unusual violence. The eruption must have started far up on the slopes of Mauna Loa. As it sped down toward the sea, it met some obstruction which, although overwhelmed, checked the flow and caused a great mass of cinders and ashes to be thrown out until a large hill with a hollow crater was built up, covering many acres of ground. Soon the lava found another vent and then another obstruction and a second, and then a third, hill were formed nearer the sea. These hills or extinct craters bear the names Halai, Opeapea, and Puu Honu. They are not far from the Wailuku River, famous for its picturesque waterfalls and also for the legends which are told along its banks. Hina had several daughters, four of whose names are given: Hina Keahi, Hina Kekai, Hina Mahuia, and Hina Kuluua. Each name marked the peculiar mana or divine gift which Hina, the mother, had bestowed upon her daughters. Hina Keahi meant the Hina who had control of fire. This name is sometimes given to Hina the mother. Hina Kekai was the daughter who had power over the sea. She was said to have been in a canoe with her brother Maui when he fished up Coconut Island [Mokuola], his line breaking before he could pull it up to the mainland and make it fast. Hina Kuluua was the mistress over the forces of rain. The winds and the storms were supposed to obey her will. Hina Mahuia is peculiarly a name 23 connected with the legends of the other island groups of the Pacific; Mahuia or Mafuie was a god or goddess of fire all through Polynesia. The legend of the Hilo hills pertains especially to Hina Keahi and Hina Kuluua. Hina the mother gave the hill Halai to Hina Keahi and the hill Puuhonu to Hina Kuluua for their families and dependents. The hills were of rich soil and there was much rain. Therefore, for a long time, the two daughters had plenty of food for themselves and their people. But at last the days were like fire and the sky had no rain to it. The taro planted on the hillsides died. The bananas and sugar cane and sweet potatoes withered and the fruit on the trees was blasted. The people were faint because of hunger, and the shadow of death was over the land. Hina Keahi pitied her suffering friends and determined to provide food for them. Slowly her people labored at her command. Over they went to the banks of the river course, which was only the bed of an ancient lava stream, over which no water was flowing. The famished laborers toiled. gathering and carrying back whatever wood they could find, then went up the mountainside to the great koa and ohia forests, gathering their burdens of fuel according to the wishes of the chiefess. Their sorcerers planted charms along the way and uttered incantations to ward off the danger of failure. The priests offered sacrifices and prayers for the safe and successful return of the burden bearers. After many days, the great quantity of wood desired by the goddess was piled up by the side of the Halai Hill. Then came the days of digging out the hill and making a great imu or cooking oven, and preparing it with stones and wood. Large quantities of wood were thrown into the place. Stones best fitted for retaining heat were gathered and the fires kindled. When the stones were hot, Hina Keahi directed the people to arrange the imu in its proper order for cooking the materials for a great feast. A place was made for sweet potatoes, another for taro, another for pigs, and another for dogs. All the forms of preparing the food for cooking were passed through, but no real food was laid on the stones. 24 Then Hina told them to make a place in the imu for a human sacrifice. Probably, out of every imu of the long ago, a small part of the food was offered to the gods, and there may have been a special place in the imu for that part of the food to be cooked. At any rate, Hina had this oven so built that the people understood that a remarkable sacrifice would be offered in it to the gods, who for some reason had sent the famine upon the people. Therefore it was in quiet despair that the workmen obeyed Hina Keahi and prepared the place for sacrifice. It might mean their own holocaust as an offering to the gods. At last Hina Keahi bade the laborers cease their work and stand by the side of the oven, ready to cover it with the dirt which had been thrown out and piled up by the side. The people stood by, not knowing upon whom the blow might fall. But Hina Keahi was "Hina the Kind," and although she stood before them robed in royal majesty and power. still her face was full of pity and love. Her voice melted the hearts of her retainers as she bade them carefully follow her directions. "O my people! Where are you? Will you obey and do as I command? This imu is my imu. I shall lie down in its bed of burning stones. I shall sleep under its cover. But deeply cover me, or I may perish. Quickly throw the dirt over my body. Fear not the fire. Watch for three days. A woman will stand by the imu. Obey her will." Hina Keahi was very beautiful, and her eyes flashed light like fire as she stepped into the great pit and lay down on the burning stones. A great smoke arose and gathered over the imu. The men toiled rapidly, placing the imu mats over their chiefess and throwing the dirt back into the oven until it was all thoroughly covered and the smoke was quenched. Then they waited for the strange, mysterious thing which must fallow the sacrifice of this divine chiefess. Halai hill trembled and earthquakes shook the land round about. The great heat of the fire in the imu withered the little life that was still left from the 25 famine. Meanwhile, Hina Keahi was carrying out her plan for securing aid for her people. She could not be injured by the heat, for she was a goddess of fire. The waves of heat raged around her as she sank down through the stones of the imu into the underground paths which belonged to the spirit world. The legend says that Hina made her appearance in the form of a gushing stream of water which would always supply the wants of her adherents. The second day passed. Hina was still journeying underground, but this time she came to the surface as a pool named Moe-waa (Canoe Sleep), much nearer the sea. The third day came and Hina caused a great spring of sweet water to burst forth from the seashore in the very path of the ocean surf. This received the name of Auauwai. Here Hina washed away all traces of her journey through the depths. This was the last of the series of earthquakes and the appearance of new water springs. The people waited, feeling that some more wonderful event must follow the remarkable experience of the three days. Soon a woman stood by the imu, who commanded the laborers to dig away the dirt and remove the mats. When this was done, the hungry people found a very great abundance of food, enough to supply their wants until the food plants should have time to ripen and the days of the famine should be over. The joy of the people was great when they knew that their chiefess had escaped death and would still dwell among them in comfort. Many were the songs sung and stories told about the great famine and the success of the goddess of fire. The second sister, Hina Kuluua, the goddess of rain, was always very jealous of her beautiful sister Hina Keahi, and many times sent rain to put out fires which her sister tried to kindle. Hina Keahi could not stand the rain and so fled with her people to a home by the seaside. Hina Kuluua could control rain and storms, but for some reason failed to provide a food supply for her people, and the famine wrought havoc among them. She thought of the stories told and songs sung about her 26 Sister, and wished for the same honor for herself. She commanded her people to make a great imu for her in the hill Puu Honu. She knew that a strange power belonged to her and yet, blinded by jealousy, forgot that rain and fire could not work together. She planned to furnish a great supply of food for her people in the same way in which her sister had worked. The oven was dug. Stones and wood were collected and the same ghostly array of potatoes, taro, pig and dog prepared as had been done before by her sister. The kahunas or priests knew that Hina Kuluua was going out of her province in trying to do as her sister had done, but there was no use in attempting to change her plans. Jealousy is self-willed and obstinate, and no amount of reasoning from her dependents could have any influence over her. The ordinary incantations were observed, and Hina Kuluua gave the same directions as those her sister had given. The imu was to be well heated. The make-believe food was to be put in and a place left for her body. It was the goddess of rain making ready to lie down on a bed prepared for the goddess of fire. When all was ready, she lay down on the heated stones and the oven mats were thrown over her and the ghostly provisions. Then the covering of dirt was thrown back upon the mats and heated stones, filling the pit which had been dug. The goddess of rain was left to prepare a feast for her people as the goddess of fire had done for her followers. Some of the legends have introduced the demi-god Maui into this story. The natives say that Maui came to "burn or cook the rain" and that he made the oven very hot, but that the goddess of rain escaped and hung over the hill in the form of a cloud. At least this is what the people saw - not a cloud of smoke over the imu, but a rain cloud. They waited and watched for such evidences of underground labor as attended the passage of Hina Keahi through the earth from the hill to the sea, but the only strange appearance was the dark rain cloud. They waited three days and looked for their chiefess to come in the form of a woman. They waited another day and still another, and no signs or wonders were manifest. 27 Meanwhile, Maui, changing himself into a white bird, flew up into the sky to catch the ghost of the goddess of rain that had escaped from the burning oven. Having caught this spirit, he rolled it in some kapa cloth that he kept for food to be placed in an oven, and carried it to a place in the forest on the mountainside, where again the attempt was made to "bum the rain"; but a great drop escaped and sped upward into the sky. Again Maui caught the ghost of the goddess and carried it to a pali or precipice below the great volcano Kilauea, where he again tried to destroy it in the heat of a great lava oven. But this time the spirit escaped and found a safe refuge among kukui trees on the mountainside. from which she sometimes rises in clouds that the natives say are the sure sign of rain. The ghosts of Hina Keahi and Hina Kuluua sometimes draw near to the old hills in the form of the fire of flowing lava or clouds of rain, while the old men and women tell the story of the Hinas, the sisters of Maui, who were laid upon the burning stones of the imus of a famine. [Westervelt 1987:25-31] While Theodore Kelsey was working with kūpuna of Hilo (1921), they shared with him descriptions the Ponahawai-Punahoa landscape that were of cultural and historical importance. Among their stories was that of Hina-a-ke-ahi and Hina-kulu-ua, similar to that above. They also told him of an important event that took place on a small hill above Hāla„i in 1881. Though late in the history of these lands, this event was one that stood out in the native mind as being of great importance to the well-being of Hilo. In a series of letters from Kelsey to Thomas Thrum (in the collection of Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum), Kelsey wrote of the famed hills of Hala„i, Pu„u Honu and Pu'u a Kamali„i, the latter being the hill to which Princess Ruth Ke„elikolani (Governess of Hawai„i) went in August of 1881, when she personally asked Pele to spare Hilo from the Mauna Loa lava flow of 1881. 28 Kelsey's letters on this matter include the following observations: June 16, 1921 ... Ben Brown gave me the meanings of the names of the hills back of Hilo. Hala„i hill was named because of the easy life led by the subjects of Hina a ke Ahi, after she had relieved their famine by placing her body in the imu to create food for them. She went under ground appearing at two or three springs called Hina Auau Wai, and finally came walking up from the sea. Puu Honu is named after the rain sister, Hina a ka Ua, who was baked in her unsuccessful attempt to imitate Hina a ke Ahi. Hina a ka Ua only crawled about like a tortoise, never getting anywhere-nee wale iho no i kauhale [moving about only in her dwelling]. Puu o Kamalii was the peoples‟ playground. There was a holua slide from there down to the Nawahi place. Since Princess Ruth went up there in 1881 and prayed for the lava flow to stop, the hill has often been called Puu Alii [Royal Hill] ... [BPBM Vol. 1:930]. Based on Kelsey and his informants references to known locations— Hāla„i and Pu„u Honu also being identified on historic maps—Pu„u Kamali„i (Hill of the Children - perhaps referring to the children of Hina), or Pu„u Ali'i (Royal Hill) would apparently be the middle hill, as there is no other hill in the vicinity [Maly and Maly 2003:14-19]. The story of the three hills is an important part of the cultural memories of older Hilo residents, though it is not often visited for specific cultural practices. Pu„uhonu was recommended for preservation (Escott 2017). 29 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS At least fourteen archaeological studies were conducted in the area near the current project area (Figure 8 and Table 2). Six studies included portions of Kūkūau 1st Ahupua„a (Kelly & Athens 1982, Neslon et al. 2006, Rosendahl 1988, Rechtman 2009, Wickler & Ward 1992, and Wilkinson et al. 2012). The vast majority of studies did not encounter archaeological sites. This is not surprising since much of the area within Hilo town has been developed. It is likely that most archaeological remains have been disturbed and obscured by construction activities associated with modern development (Hudson 1932:226). Thrum (1907) and Stokes and Dye (1991) documented heiau located on the Island of Hawai„i. Many of the heiau in the Hilo area had been dismantled by the time Thrum arrived to document them. There were no heiau located in Kūkūau 1st Ahupua„a. Only five of the fourteen previous archaeology studies documented a few archaeological sites (see Table 2). Walker and Rosendahl (1996) recorded five historic sugarcane sites, including Waiakea Sugar Plantation field features and remains from the old Hilo Sugar Company mill. Pre-Contact era artifacts were recovered from one feature, indicating a pre-Contact component. The plantation field features and pre-Contact era artifacts were identified south of Hāla„i Hill in Ponahawai Ahupua„a, outside of the current project area (see Figure 8). The old Hilo Sugar Company mill site is east of the current project area, though the mill is no longer present, and more modern structures have been built over the site. None of the archaeological sites documented in Walker and Rosendahl (1996) will be impacted by the proposed cellular tower undertaking. Clark and Rechtman (2006) also recorded a single sugarcane era rock mound south of the current project area. Wolforth (2006) recorded the Kanakea fishpond, pecked basins, and three historic sites, all of which east of the current project area. 30 Figure 8: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area (Green Border) and Previous Archaeological Studies (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). 31 Table 2: Previous Archaeological Studies Near the Project Area. Study Reference Study Type Location Results Thrum 1907 Heiau Survey Hawaiian Island No Heiau in Kūkūau 1st Ahupa„a Hudson 1932 Survey East Hawaii Very Few Sites in Hilo Area Kelly & Athens 1982 Cultural Resources Reconnaissance Wailoa River No Archaeological Sites at Wailoa River Rosendahl & Talea 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey Hilo Airport No Archaeological Sites Rosendahl 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey Four Locations in Hilo, One Just North of Current Project No Archaeological Sites Smith & Tourtellotte 1988 Burial Discovery Mouth of Wailoa River Single Burial Stokes and Dye 1991 Heiau Survey Hawaiian Island No Heiau in Kūkūau 1st Ahupa„a Wickler & Ward 1992 Archaeological Investigation „Alenaio Stream Historic Artifacts Only, No Sites Walker & Rosendahl 1996 Archaeological Assessment Hilo Judicial Complex Five Historic Sites Rosendahl 2004 Archaeological Assessment Hilo Judicial Complex No Archaeological Sites Wolforth 2006 AIS Reed's Bay Beach Park Two Pre-Contact and Three Historic Sites Nelson et al. 2006 AIS Kūkūau 1st Ahupa„a Historic Era Enclosure Clark & Rechtman 2006 Section 106 Mohouli Street One Historic Era Rock Mound Rechtman 2009 Archaeological Assessment Hilo Bay Front to Reed's Bay No Archaeological Sites Escott 2019 Archaeological Assessment Current Project Area No Archaeological Sites 32 A single set of burial remains were identified by Smith and Tourtellotte (1988) 2.0km northeast of the current project area, at the mouth of the Wailoa River (not plotted on Figure 8). None of the previously identified archaeological sites will be affected by the current undertaking. Rechtman Consulting, LLC conducted an AIS study (Nelson et al. 2006) adjacent to the current project area that included a narrow study corridor bisecting the current project area (see Figure 8 and Figure 9). A single archaeological site (Site #50-10-35- 25547) was recorded on TMK: (3) 2-4-025: 048 (Figure 10 and Figure 11). Site 25547 is a 24.0 m long (NE/SW) by 2.0 m wide by 2.0 m high Historic era linear enclosure constructed along a naturally occurring crack in a raised pāhoehoe bedrock outcrop (Nelson et al. 2006:12). The bedrock crack as been modified in three locations by stacking cobbles along the sides and across the middle of the crack (see Figure 11). The enclosure was likely constructed to keep animals. Site 25547 appeared to be unaltered and was in good condition. Site 25547 is considered significant under Criterion d, as having, or likely to yield information important to Historic era animal husbandry features. No further work was recommended for Site 25547 (Nelson et al. 2006:18). The AIS report was approved by the Hawai„i State Historic Division (SHPD) (Log No. 2006.3275, Doc. No. 0609JT83, Approval Letter dated September 28, 2006). Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted an Archaeological Assessment (AA) for Parcel 080 (Escott 2019) to identify archaeological sites and/or historic properties within the survey area (see Figure 8). Parcel 080 is a private access easement with a paved driveway down the center of the parcel. The driveway provides access for residential homes on property along the west and south boundaries of Parcel 080. There is a modern drainage culvert constructed in the 1970s that crosses the center of Parcel 080 from the west to east. There were no archaeological sites or historic properties identified during the field inspection. 33 Figure 9: TMK: (3) 2-4-025 Map Showing Location of Current Housing Project Area Shaded Yellow and Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area Shaded Gray (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006:3). 34 Figure 10: Map Showing Location of Site 25547, Current Housing Project Area Shaded Yellow and Nelson et al. (2006) Project Area Shaded Gray (Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006:13). 35 Figure 11: Site 25547 Plan View Map (Nelson et al. 2006: 14). 36 RECORDS SEARCH RESULTS A search was made for archaeological sites and architectural structures within a roughly half-mile of the current project area that are eligible for listing on the NRHP and HRHP. The results of the records search indicate that there are nineteen sites listed on the Hawai„i Register of Historic Places (Figure 12 and Table 3). Two of those sites are also listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The sites include two historic districts, several church buildings, schools, commercial buildings, homes, and a Portuguese oven. Many of the buildings are characteristic of period style architecture. Other than the nineteen sites listed in Table 3, there are no other previously recorded archaeological sites or structures eligible for listing within one half-mile of the current project area. There are a limited number of structures within one half-mile of the project area that are more than 50 years old that were not selected for listing on either register. 37 Figure 12: 7.5-Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area Shaded Yellow and Historic Registered Sites Within One Half Mile Radius (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, USGS Hilo Quadrangle). 38 Table 3: Inventory of Registered Historic Properties Within a 0.5 Mile Search Radius. State Site No. Site No. Site Name Hawai‘i Register National Register 50-10-35-07417 7417 Waiakea Mission or Haili Church 17-Nov-01 23-Apr-02 50-10-35-07418 7418 Bay Front Historic District NA 50-10-35-07420 7420 S. Hata Building 14-Jan-89 27-Aug-91 50-10-35-07422 7422 Central Christian Church 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07436 7436 Serrao Winery 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07445 7445 Ling Hing Society 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07446 7446 Konko-Kyo Daijin 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07447 7447 Villa Franca District 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07449 7449 Prudencio Portuguese Oven 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07456 7456 Hilo Hongwanji 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07458 7458 Old Chinese Language School 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07459 7459 United Community Church 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07480 7480 Waiakea Mill Camp Housing 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07481 7481 Hilo House Type #6 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07483 7483 Former Souza-Matsumura House 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07487 7487 Hilo House Type #7 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07490 7490 Hilo House Type #9 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07474 7474 Cannon-Hill Boarding School 1-Jan-92 50-10-35-07475 7475 Hilo Boarding School Site 1-Jan-92 39 CULTURAL INFORMANT INTERVIEWS SCS, Inc contacted four individuals who, either work for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs, are SHPD personnel, are familiar with the project area lands through cultural, professional, or historical work, or are long-time residents of the area (Table 3). Consultation was sought from each of the four individuals to identify past and ongoing cultural practices, as well as to identify any cultural practitioners that they could recommend for consultation. One individual responded. Table 4: Individuals Responding to CIA. Name Affiliation Responded Has Knowledge Cultural Practices Kalena Blakemore HIBC Representative Yes Some No Kamaile Puluole-Mitchell OHA East Hawai„i No - - Sean Naleimaile SHPD Archaeologist No - - Jordan Kea Calpito SHPD Burial Sites Specialist No - - SUMMARY The “level of effort undertaken” to identify potential effect by a project to cultural resources, places or beliefs (OEQC 1997) has not been officially defined and is left up to the investigator. A good faith effort can mean contacting agencies by letter, interviewing people who may be affected by the project or who know its history, research identifying sensitive areas and previous land use, holding meetings in which the public is invited to testify, notifying the community through the media, and other appropriate strategies based on the type of project being proposed and its impact potential. In the case of the present parcel, letters of inquiry were sent to organizations and individuals whose expertise would include the project area. Consultation was sought from Kamaile Puluole-Mitchell, Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) East Hawai„i Island Representative; Jordan Kea Calpito, SHPD Burial Sites Specialist; Sean Naleimaile, State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) Hawai„i Island Archaeologist; and Kalena Blakemore, Hawai„i Island Burial Council (HIBC) Member. Public notices were published in the Office of Hawaiian Affairs Ka Wai Ola Newspaper, and were published in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser and the Hawai„i Tribune Herald. 40 Historical and cultural source materials were extensively used and can be found listed in the References Cited portion of the report. Such scholars as I„i, Kamakau, Chinen, Kame„eleihiwa, Fornander, Kuykendall, Kelly, Handy and Handy, Puku„i and Elbert, Thrum, and Cordy have contributed, and continue to contribute to our knowledge and understanding of Hawai„i, past and present. The works of these and other authors were consulted and incorporated in the report where appropriate. Land use document research was supplied by the Waihona „Aina 2007 Data Base. CIA INQUIRY RESPONSE As suggested in the “Guidelines for Accessing Cultural Impacts” (OEQC 1997), CIAs incorporating personal interviews should include ethnographic and oral history interview procedures, circumstances attending the interviews, as well as the results of this consultation. It is also permissible to include organizations with individuals familiar with cultural practices and features associated with the project area. As stated above, consultation was sought from Kamaile Puluole-Mitchell, Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) East Hawai„i Island Representative; Jordan Kea Calpito, SHPD Burial Sites Specialist; Sean Naleimaile, State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) Hawai„i Island Archaeologist; and Kalena Blakemore, Hawai„i Island Burial Council (HIBC) Member. Public notices were printed in the the September 2019 issue of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) Ka Wai Ola Newspaper. Public notices were also published in the Honolulu Star- Advertiser, and the Hawai„i Tribune Herald on August 14th, 15th, and 18th. The public notices did not generate responses from the public. This fact is not surprising since it is unlikely as there no known inland locations in Hilo town where gathering or cultural practices occur. An analysis of the potential effect of the proposed construction of residences on cultural resources, practices or beliefs, its potential to isolate cultural resources, practices or beliefs from their setting, and the potential of the project to introduce elements which may alter the setting in which cultural practices take place is a requirement of the OEQC (No. 10, 1997). To our knowledge, the project area was used a location for animal husbandry in the late Historic to Modern eras. Based on historical research and responses from the above listed contacts, it is reasonable to conclude that, as the current project was not and is not a location for past and ongoing cultural practices, there will be no traditional cultural practices affected and there will be no direct adverse effect upon cultural practices or beliefs in the broader project area region. 41 CULTURAL ASSESSMEMNT Based on the results of an Archaeological Assessment of the project area, the results of previous archaeological studies, as well as organizational response, individual cultural informant responses, and archival research, it is reasonable to conclude that, pursuant to Act 50, the exercise of native Hawaiian rights, or any ethnic group, related to gathering, access or other customary activities will not be affected by development activities on this parcel. The proposed project is not a location for past or ongoing cultural practices. The proposed undertaking will not produce adverse effects to any native Hawaiian cultural practices within the project area or in the broader region. 42 REFERENCES CITED Athens, J., T. Reith, and T. Dye 2014 A paleoenvironmental and archaeological model-based age estimate for the colonization of Hawai„i. American Antiquity, 79(4):144-55. Baldwin, A. 1891 Map of Hilo Town and Vicinity. Hawaiian Government Survey Map. Registered Map #1561. Beckwith, M. 1970 Hawaiian Mythology. University of Hawai„i Press, Honolulu. Bird, I. 1969 Six Months in the Sandwich Islands. Mutual Publishing, Honolulu. Botti, R. 2002 Outrigger canoe equipment: tradition vs. technology. Tribune-Herald Pullout: 2002 State Canoe Racing Championships, page 14, Hilo. Chinen, J.J. 1961 Original Land Titles in Hawaii. Family History Library Book, Honolulu. Clark, M., and R. Rechtman 2006 Request for SHPO Concurrence with a Determination of No historic Properties Affected Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy act and in Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, Hospice of Hilo Property, [TMK (3) 2-4-001:024 (por.), Waiākea Ahupua‘a, South Hilo district, Island of Hawai‘i. Rechtman Consulting, LLC. Cordy, R. 2000 Exalted Sits the Chief: The Ancient History of Hawai‘i Island. Mutual Publishing. Honolulu. Cumming, C.F.G. 1883 Fire Fountains: The Kingdom of Hawai‘i. William Blackwood and Son, Edinburgh. Desha, S.L. 2000 Kamehameha and his Warrior Kekūhaupi‘o. Kamehameha Schools Press, Honolulu. Dye, T. 2011 A model-based age estimate for Polynesian colonization of Hawai„i. Archaeology in Oceania, 46:130-38. 43 Ellis, W. 1963 Journal of William Ellis. Honolulu Advertiser Publishing Co., Ltd, Honolulu. 1969 Polynesian Researches Hawaii. Charles E. Tuttle Company, Rutland, Vermont. Escott 2017 Archaeological Inventory Survey of the 163-Acre Wailani Project in Punahoa 1 & 2, and Ponahawai Ahupua‘a, South Hilo District, Hawai‘i Island, Hawai‘i. SCS report prepared for Dr. Peter and Wendy Matsuurs, Hilo. 2019 An Archaeological Assessment Report for a 0.6447-Acre Property in Kūkūau 1st Ahupua‘a, South Hilo District, Hawai‘i Island, Hawai‘i [TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080]. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. Report 2340-1 prepared for Urban Housing Communities, LLC. Santa Ana, CA. ESRI 2013 Arc GIS Explorer. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Ca. Finney, B.R. 1959 Hawaiian Surfing, a Study of Cultural Change. Masters Thesis at University of Hawai„i, Mānoa, Honolulu. Finney, B.R., and J.D. Houston 1966 Surfing: The Sport of Hawaiian Kings. Charles E. Tuttle Company, Rutland, Vermont. Fornander, A. 1996 Ancient History of the Hawaiian People to the Times of Kamehameha I. Mutual Publishing, Honolulu. George, M. C. 1948 The Development of Hilo, Hawaii, TH. The Edwards Letter Shop, Ann Arbor. Google Earth 2019 Google Earth Imagery. Google Earth. Mountain View, CA. Handy, E.S.C., and E.G. Handy 1972 Native Planters in Old Hawai„i. B.P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Hawai„i County Planning Department 2015 Hawai‘i County TMK Maps. http://www.hawaiicounty.gov/tax- maps/current. Henry, Teuira and Others 1995 Voyaging Chiefs of Havai‘i. Kalamukū Press, Honolulu. 44 Hudson, A.E. 1932 The Archaeology of East Hawai‘i. MS, Bernice P. Bishop Museum. I„i, J.P. 1959 Fragments of Hawaiian History. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Kalākaua, D. 1990 The Legends and Myths of Hawai‘i. Mutual Publishing. Honolulu. Kahn, J., Rieth, P. Kirch, J. Athens, and G. Murakami 2014 Re-dating of the Kuli„ou„ou rockshelter, O„ahu, Hawai„i: Location of the first radiocarbon date from the Pacific Islands. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 123(1):67-90. Kam, W. 1983 Unrecorded Heiau on State Lands, Waiākea, South Hilo, Hawai‘i. Historic Sites Section, Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu. Kamakau, S. 1961 Ruling Chiefs of Hawai‘i. The Kamehameha School Press. Honolulu. 1976 The Works of the People of Old. B.P. Bishop Museum Special Publication No. 61. B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. 1992 Ruling Chiefs of Hawai‘i. The Kamehameha School Press. Honolulu. Kame„eleihiwa, L. 1992 Native Land and Foreign Desires: Pehea Lā E Pono Ai? Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu. Kaau„a, J. 2002 The Aunties. Tribune-Herald Pullout: 2002 State Canoe Racing Championships, page 6, Hilo. Kelly, M., and S. Athens 1982 Cultural Resources Reconnaissance for the Alenaio Stream Flood Damage Reduction Study, Hilo, Hawai„i. In Archaeological and Historic Studies for the Alenaio Stream Flood Damage Reduction Study, Hilo, Hawai‘i, by M. Kelly, B. Nakamura, and D. Barrère 1981. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Kelly, M., B. Nakamura, and Dorothy Barrèr 1981 A Chronological History, Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawai‘i. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. 45 Kelsey, T. 1926 Legend of the Hilo Hills. September 29, 1926, Hilo Tribune-Herald, Hilo. Kikuchi, W.K. 1973 Hawaiian Aquacultural System. Dissertation Submitted to Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona. Kirch, P.V. 1985 Feather Gods and Fishhooks: An Introduction to Hawaiian Archaeology. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. Kirch, P.V. and M. Kelly (eds.) 1975 Prehistory and Ecology in a Windward Hawaiian Valley: Halawa Valley, Molokai. Pacific Anthropological Records, 24. Knox, T.W. 1971 The Boy Travellers in Australia. Paul Flesch and Company, Melbourne. Kuykendall, R.S. 1966 The Hawaiian Kingdom. Vol. 1. University of Hawai„i Press. Honolulu. Leithead, A.S. 1974 Hilo, Hawaii: It’s Origins and the Pattern of its Growth, 1778-1900. A Senior Honor Thesis Presented to Department of History, University of Hawai„i, Hilo. Malden, C.R. 1825 Chart of Hilo Bay. In A Chronological History, Land and Water Use in the Hilo Bay Area, Island of Hawai‘i, by M. Kelly, B. Nakamura, and D. Barrère 1981. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Malo, D. 1951 Hawaiian Antiquities. Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu. Maly, K. and O. Maly 2003 He Wahi Mo‘olelo No Ponahawai A Me Punohao Ma Hilo (A Collection of Traditions and Historical Accounts for Ponahawai and Punahoa, District of Hilo, Island of Hawai‘i) [TMK 2-3-044:019; 2-3-049:053; 2-3-037:001]. Kumu Pono Associates report prepared for Kimura International, Honolulu. 2004 Ka Hana Lawai‘i A Me Nā Kai ‘Ewalu. Kumu Pono Associates report prepared for the Nature Conservancy, Honolulu, HI. McEldowney, H. 1979 Archaeological and Historical Literature Search and Research Design: Lava Flow Control Study, Hilo, Hawaii, Department of Anthropology, Bishop Museum. Prepared for the U.S. Army Engineer District, Pacific Ocean. 46 National Geographic, Topo! 2003 Seamless USGS Topographic Maps on CD-ROM, Hawai‘i. National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Washington, D.C. Nelson, J., M. Clark and R Rechtman 2006 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessment for the Proposed Acquisition of Drainageway Lands Project (TKs:3-2-4-25:48, 50, 53, 59 por., 67 por., 78 por., 80 por., 93, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por., and 126 por.). Rechtman Consulting, LLC Report RC-0342 prepared for SSFM. Honolulu. Nordhoff, C 1974 Northern California, Oregon, and the Sandwich Islands. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley. OEQC 2010 Office of Environmental Quality Control OEQC Bulletin. Honolulu. Pearson, R.J., P.V. Kirch, and M. Pietrusewsky 1971 An Early Prehistoric Site at Bellows Beach, Waimanalo, Oahu, Hawaiian Islands. Archaeology and Physical Anthropology in Oceania, 6:204-234. Pukui, M.K., S.H. Elbert, and E.T. Mookini 1974 Place Names of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. Pukui, M.K. with L.C.S. Green 1995 Folktales of Hawai‘i. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Rechtman, R. 2009 Archaeological Assessment Survey for the Proposed Hilo Bayfront Trails Project, South Hilo District, Pi‘ihonua, Punahoa, Ponahawai, Kūkūau, and Waiākea Ahupua‘a, Island of Hawai‘i. Rechtman Consulting, LLC. Reed, F. 1987 Hilo Legends. Petroglyph Press, Hilo. Rieth, Timothy M., Terry L. Hunt, Carl Lipo, and Janet M. Wilmshurst 2011 The 13th Century Polynesian Colonization of Hawai„i Island. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:2740-2749. Rosendahl, M. 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey for EIS, Hilo Judiciary Complex Sites, Hilo, District of South Hilo, Island of Hawai‘i. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. 47 Rosendahl, M., and T. Talea 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey for Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Proposed Irradiation Plant Site, Land of Waiākea, District of South Hilo, Island of Hawai‘i. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. Rosendahl, P. 2004 Archaeological Assessment and Monitoring Plan, Hilo Judiciary Complex Kaiko‘o Mall Site, Land of Waiākea, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai‘i [TMK (3) 2-2-015:076]. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. Sato, H., W. Ikeda, R Paeth, R Smythe, and M. Takehiro Jr. 1973 Soil Survey of Island of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Washington D.C. Smith, M., and P. Tourtellotte 1988 Wailoa Bridge Renovation Project, Site 50-10-11115 Burial Removal. DLNR Historic Sites Section, Honolulu. Stewart, C.S. 1970 Journal of a Residency in the Sandwich Islands, During the Years 1823, 1824, and 1825. University of Hawai„i Press. Honolulu. Stokes, J.F.G., and T. Dye 1991 Heiau of the Island of Hawai‘i; A Historic Survey of Native Hawaiian Temple Sites. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Summers, C. C. 1964 Hawaiian Fishponds. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Special Publicatin 52. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Thrum, T.G. 1907 Heiau and heiau sites throughout the Hawaiian Islands. Hawaii Almanac and Annual 1908, Honolulu: [n.p]. Titcomb, M. 1952 Native Use of Fish in Hawaii. University of Hawai„i Press, Honolulu. Waihona „Aina 2012 Māhele online database. www.waihona.com. Walker, A., and P. Rosendahl 1996 Archaeological Assessment Study Hilo Judiciary Complex Project. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. 48 Warshauer, K. 2001 Destruction awaited Hilo‟s seaport debut. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, December 30, pages 7 and 9, Hilo. 2002a Wailoa Bridge had a long history of trouble. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, May 12, pages 17-18, Hilo. 2002b Hilo‟s Wailoa bridge was a costly venture. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, May 12, pages 21-22, Hilo. 2002c Rotating swing bridge survived two tsunamis. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, March 10, 21 and 23, Hilo. 2002d Hilo‟s railroad wharf opened in 1903. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, January 6, pages 33 and 35, Hilo. 2003a Hilo Iron Works an early steel success. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, May 18, pages 27-28, Hilo. 2003b Some Banyan Drive Signs Need Correction. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, April 27, 2003, Hilo. 2004a Famed Trees of Banyan Drive Still Mislabeled. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, April 11, 2004, Hilo. 2004b Hilo‟s Wailoa River was once a busy waterway. Hawai„i Tribune-Herald, February 18 pages F1-2, Hilo. 2005 Orchid Isle Hotel Once Stood on Banyan Drive Lot. Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald, July 25, 2005, Hilo. Westervelt, W.D. 1977 Hawaiian Historical Legends. Charles E. Tuttle Company, Rutland, Vermont. Wickler, S., and J. Ward 1992 Archaeological and Paleoenvironmental Investigations for Alenaio Stream Flood Control Project, Hilo, Hawai‘i Island. International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc., Honolulu. Wilmhurst, J., T. Hunt, C. Lipo, and A. Anderson 2011a High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108:1815-20. 49 2011b Reply to Mulrrooney et al.: Accepting lower precision radiocarbon dates results in longer colonization chronologies for East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108:E195. Wolfe, E.W., and J. Morris 1996 Geological Map of the Island of Hawai„i. U.S.G.S. Miscellaneous Investigations Series. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Wolforth, T. 2006 Inventory Survey for the Proposed Reed's Bay Beach Park, Hilo. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu. Wolforth. T.R., W. Wulzen and S.T. Goodfellow 1997 Archaeological Data Recovery at West Loch Estates Residential Increment I, and Golf Course and Shoreline Park. Prepared for City and County of Honolulu. PHRI Report 440-111197, Hilo. 2007 Cultural Impact Assessment for Hilo Bayfront Master Plan, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai‘i. SCS Report #777-1 prepared for County of Hawai„i Parks and Recreation, Hilo. USCOE 1983 Reed's Bay Harbor, Hawaii: A Reevaluation Report and Draft Environmental Impact Statement for Small-Craft Navigation Improvements. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Pacific Ocean Division. Zambucka, K. 1992 The High Chiefess Ruth Keelikolani. Green Glass Productions, Honolulu. A-1 APPENDIX A: PUBLIC NOTICES AND AFFIDAVITS A-2 September 2019 Ka Wai Ola Public Notice. A-3 August 2019 Honolulu Star-Advertiser Public Notice. A-4 August 2019 Hawai‘i Tribune-Herald Public Notice. Mitchell D.Roth Mayor 41g: or. Susan K.Kunz Housing Administrator Lee E.Lord Managing Director Harry M.Yada Assistant Housing Administrator Robert H.Command ofNOS.- Deputy Managing Director County of Hawaii Office of Housing and Community Development 1990 Kino`ole Street,Suite 102 • Hilo,Hawai`i 96720 • (808)961-8379 • Fax(808)961-8685 Existing Housing:(808)959-4642 • Fax(808)959-9308 Kona: (808)323-4300 • Fax(808)323-4301 March 2,2022 Alan Downer,PhD State Historic Preservation Officer Hawai`i State Historic Preservation Division 601 Kamokila Blvd.,Rm.555 Kapolei, Hawaii 96707 Alan.S.Downer@hawaii.gov RE: Request for Concurrence on No Historic Properties Affected Determination,Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act for the proposed Kaiaulu 0 Kapi`olani Housing Project Located on a 5.05-Acre Property in Knknau 1st Ahupua`a,South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii [TMK: (3)2-4025:048,053 and 080] Dear Mr. Downer: In accordance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and its implementing regulations,36 CFR Part 800,the County of Hawai`i(COH)Office of Housing and Community Development(OHCD)is providing information for your review and concurrence regarding the above- referenced proposed undertaking. The Kaiaulu 0 Kapi`olani Affordable Housing Project is eligible for U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)assistance and is subject to review under 24 CFR Part 58 Section 5 of 1998,as amended(2003). OHCD is the entity responsible for compliance with environmental requirements including those relating to NHPA and Section 106. Based on our research of the property;the results ofan Archaeological Inventory Survey(AIS)report H-02119)for TMK: (3)2-4-025:048, 050, 053, 059 por., 067 por., 078 por., 080 por., 093, 106 por., 107 por., 108 por., 109 por., 110 por., 115 por.,and 126 por. (Nelson et al.2006)and an Archaeological Assessment(AA) letter report for Parcel 080(Escott 2019a);the results of a Cultural Impact Assessment Escott 2019b), and the results of Section 106 consultation conducted with the Hawai`i State Historic Preservation Division(SHPD),Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHO),Hawaii Island traditional cultural practitioners,and long-time community members we have defined the Area of Potential Effect(APE)as TMK: (3)2-4025:048,053 and 08. We have made a Finding of"No Historic Properties Affected"pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1)based on the following: 2203askic EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY Alan Downer,PhD State Historic Preservation Officer March 2,2022 Page 2 The Area of Potential Effect(APE)is TMK: (3)2-4025:048,053 and 08 and is 5.05 acres [Enclosures 1 through 4]. The 5.05-acre project area is located approximately one kilometer southwest the coast ofHilo Bay Front and is bordered Kukuau Street to the west and by Kapi`olani Street to the north. The south and east property boundaries are bordered by undeveloped residential lots. The project area is currently undeveloped. The APE is situated within a built environment that includes residential homes,paved parking lots and walkways,paved roads,and landscaping. The project area property is owned by Giampaolo Boschetti. Rechtman Consulting,LLC conducted an AIS study(Nelson et al. 2006)within portions ofthe current project area[Enclosure 5].A single archaeological site(Site#50-10-35-25547)was recorded on TMK: 3)2-4-025: 048 [Enclosure 6]. Site 25547 is a 24.0 m long(NE/SW)by 2.0 m wide by 2.0 m high Historic era linear enclosure constructed along a naturally occurring crack in a raised pahoehoe bedrock outcrop(Nelson et al. 2006:12). The bedrock crack was modified in three locations by stacking cobbles along the sides and across the middle ofthe crack [Enclosure 7]. The enclosure was likely constructed to keep animals. Site 25547 appeared to be unaltered and was in good condition. Site 25547 was assessed significant under Criterion d, in accordance with eligibility criteria for listing on the Hawai`i Register of Historic Places(HRHP),as having yielded information important to Historic era animal husbandry features. Site 25547 was recorded in detail and there is virtually no excavation potential. Therefore,no further work was recommended for Site 25547(Nelson et al. 2006:18). This site was not considered a traditional cultural property, and there were no natural or cultural resources,or cultural beliefs and practices identified relative to the land within the current study area. The AIS report was approved by the Hawai`i State Historic Division(SHPD)(Log No. 2006.3275, Doc.No. 0609JT83, Approval Letter dated September 28,2006). Site 25547 is not eligible/recommended for listing on the NRHP. The animal pen does not have excavation potential and has been fully recorded in the Nelson et al. (2006)AIS report. The SHPD- accepted AIS report recommended no further work and archaeological preservation is not warranted. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc.(SCS)conducted an AA for Parcel 080(Escott 2019a,HICRIS Project 2021PR00880)to identify archaeological sites and/or historic properties within the survey area Enclosure 8]. Parcel 080 is a private access easement with a paved driveway down the center ofthe parcel. The driveway provides access for residential homes on property along the west and south boundaries ofParcel 080. There is a modern drainage culvert constructed in the 1970s that crosses the center of Parcel 080 from the west to east. There were no archaeological sites or historic properties identified during the field inspection. Scientific Consultant Services,Inc.(SCS)conducted a CIA(Escott 2019b)to identify and assess any possible impacts to past or ongoing cultural practices. The CIA concluded that based on archival research, the results ofprevious archaeological studies,a review of NRHP and HRHP eligible historic properties within a one-halfmile radius, as well as organizational response and individual cultural informant responses, it is reasonable to conclude that,pursuant to Act 50,the exercise of native Hawaiian rights, or Alan Downer, PhD State Historic Preservation Officer March 2, 2022 Page 3 any ethnic group,related to gathering, access or other customary activities will not be affected by the proposed Kaiaulu o Kapi`olani Affordable Housing Project. The proposed undertaking will not produce adverse effects to any native Hawaiian cultural practices within the project area or in the broader region. OHCD conducted Section 106 consultation Native Hawaiian Organizations(NHO), Hawai`i Island traditional cultural practitioners,and long-time community members.A record of Section 106 consultation is included with this letter.None of the respondents knew of any historic properties, archaeological or cultural sites,or past or ongoing cultural practices associated with the project area property. Based on Section 106 consultation conducted for the Kaiaulu o Kapi`olani Affordable Housing Project, the proposed undertaking will have no effect to historic properties, cultural properties,or cultural practices. The OHCD has made a Finding of"No Historic Properties Affected"pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1). Included for your review are copies of relevant documents supporting our finding,along with maps showing the location of the property. This documentation satisfies requirements set forth at§800.11(d). In accordance with §800.4(d)(1)(i),your office has thirty days to object to this finding. Please respond within this timeframe, otherwise we will assume that you concur with our finding.If you concur,please sign on the line below and return a copy of this letter to Assistant Housing Administrator Harry Yada. If you have questions regarding this finding,please direct them to Harry Yada. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sin - ely, iviNw Susan . nz Hous . Al istrator Concurrence: State Historic Preservation Officer Date Enclosures: Enclosure 1: Hawai`i Island Project Area Map Enclosure 2: USGS TMK Project Area Map Enclosure 3: TMK: (3)2-4-025 Map Enclosure 4: Aerial Photo ofProject Area Enclosure 5: Nelson and Rechtman(2006)Project Area Map Enclosure 6: Nelson and Rechtman(2006)Project Site Map Enclosure 7:Nelson and Rechtman(2006) Site 25547 Plan View Map Enclosure 8: Escott(2019a)Project Area Map REFERENCES CITED Escott, G. 2019a An Archaeological Assessment Reportfor a 0.6447-Acre Property in Kukuau Is`Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Hawai`i Island, Hawai`i[TMK: (3)2-4-025:080J Scientific Consultant Services,Inc. Report 2340-1 prepared for Urban Housing Communities, LLC. Santa Ma, CA. 2019b A Cultural Impact Assessmentfor a 0.6447-Acre Property in Kukuau Is`Ahupua`a, South Hilo District, Hawai`i Island, Hawai`i[TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080]. Scientific Consultant Services,Inc. Report 2340-1 prepared for Urban Housing Communities,LLC. Santa Ana, CA. Nelson,J.,M. Clark and R Rechtman 2006 Archaeological Inventory Survey and Limited Cultural Assessmentfor the Proposed Acquisition ofDrainageway Lands Project(TKs:3-2-4-25:48, 50, 53, 59 por., 67por., 78 por., 80 por., 93, 106por., 107por., 108por., 109por., 110por., 115 por., and 126por.). Rechtman Consulting,LLC Report RC- 0342 prepared for SSFM. Honolulu. e1,T_-;,.F. ;94-.. _.F _r16 - =F. :5- ^F ,t.-.c-....F F. ..-1s4-J,,E 266=;e-F. :7Bo,,,m F. =9C"-F WGS84 7e• ;2=21..,'.,F. z' z o HAWAII R. HAWAII col 1,1 Z s Lzi Z ev»y n. f T 1 k l H.t M r.Sti waa c y 1....--.--`a-,y.\ l matin IYe,x. 1 L 41'ar xw 4. 1'.. c f S a 1)..)"'"'t1J 24 N r n roR .» •-•'-' `L. i1,7:I t PROJECT AREA H4#' ` a..r. 4 kt,,,tt has'r..s •5 + < 4 ---.;,...' ‘ t..-.. , 4 ,, P F.024,•203. 4au'ia N 3R#tfiK d f4 Io.'. fi-.., i '14'. „, ., e,,,‘"•\I , i P ' \..„\_k 1...... it...1,,,,..o„:, z cI+ } 4,-„' 3 ,`d,. r5.'.. _.. 1 arear.ucR€ - r/ a 14.4 77 Y KMww.a Z e J i.., z g. r l ' 2..41 tya 4 ' Y.r..: 1 f tdtY' 4v Y.bara fneR»i c y =-, f 1,-:Y N E .', t I s.y i f ,rs.. NFi z .. 1 t r'''''''r''''''' z 3 hen. v Z x slrS$'Aet k 0 3584 Zone 4Q el8coo^,E a95 cc>mE zp7aaom E. z19aoo.^E. 231 ^^E. z43aoo'^E. 255.-, E. z67ooa.^E. z79c om E. z9l oocmfE. 303coo,..E. 319^coTE. i\#I 0 5 10 1_^ 20 23mdee Enclosure 1: 5,500 K-Series Map of Hawai`i Showing Location of Project Area(National Geographic Topo!, 2003. Sources: National Geographic Society,USGS). cn 0 N w000Z8 TZ N wooaT B TZ 0 co' l_N w o t'a ,ti p, 1 E o y- t o till' <tiz, jiltitsmicritiimmaida CO Ca. D't N!jj t' 0')4 ' Q, bqo 4?‘11.11 i I u 1111 CD efillUllirnIMP. Li, QJ N, 30' 01. Joi I 1 IIIIItlrlf4O1l cctlifillillikili. -. 0 11111 * r m , X lilt S ON «# felY = 7 O C r * FtaaxtS r, F riii1mardo33 i CqYatt 2 Y gsela m c' ' O GACll S I a i ,L_ eta LLJ o xN E o it,0,t-.1 Zs fes' 111110 t l I bD 11.t Js. fto i.: 1 r f 06 r A C1 4' LLI j -I ti o I g 03 bq 4 r,LLI 44 0 CY tCY' O el O Q D N Luo00E8IE N w000ZB it. N w000T8 TZ W tr, ' Laatl.ac 3100NI>1 017.1• 1at,Z —I 1 ,Z.('s 1.-41az1 (i) --*k r .,„..,,e- r"1\ 71, , ke•-• AI 11 fhii ii. i 11 •A - lit I, la„.1 t.:;.,4_,____J: ii.5 V;A ‘1% 1, v. g--------\:, 4 V'11 till ''. 11. <-4 IFS I lelto• 0 111 I Cr)a....i.1410,n7n elec41 h 1 g a)I 1 t iZI ;•— i Ei • I t rg X 1:2-1o. ,4 1 7-.VIM° 1. T k RD t. 2 '.'1. II la11,4 71iix a it 7.,,,,v.,,, 1,-iz . • 1, - 07-. a 1 ‘• r -,,1 It- 1-- -- t, A, cot • 111i . 1 11 2,. 4: 0)0 la % 3/4 , {,_ „ 1 •,:,. t% ' I 1 1 i*, ii 4111441;, t i' l i-- •1.- 3 I-- 2 ";:a., '"'511 ''' 1'444' $1.'l. / 4 ft ,0 C.)11i1 4 Ct:RI SliDgi 51 7-11 Zt. a.)a 18.iii I '5' 4-1 4 igttl 1..4N 7 4 4-1 I '1 a I (.-,' 4 ,4-,.... - •le"9_ - 1 ;I Qs,I I k,-::, :. = -, .,,,... t s,i if .tt 8Iii ":„-•-• ,,,V*, t: z. 0 7-- j-- 4•414.e, t 2 116 i 1N, ii et Z 4,' - • ,-. . . 11 1 - rff )- „I o''''ill11P — : .V.' t 8, 1 i cr)I. ,,---- -t:: 1k.vt,,. 1 Ir.'.. . •', - , • • !.:I 0 1.t / 1 i kr)41r f-Z...1••••• _1 Lzer i . r t) ,,... .-,—.,,....,-.7„,.‘-. ....,..,,,4t„, \ 1111 *1*-,-main ., • • t .., gi •. , 4 1.-747‘1,41;7, i ,-.ii0 $,..: , H v-., ,. ..A.i ...,. II;-if:,- „. \i . '--:, ...,,,,„ r ,P • i I ; r . 11.67**: i.:° 1: Pi I 0 Oz A 614 oNN--"--- 4o o I& c, N U W 6 C6 o0„... g F O o O 5 No M N 00 N 5 Q\ O O 00 0 NO tM0 it o z v; 04 to c v', NUg...--'. O CC. NNNNNN: N: NNN. A. G asliN Q tG74 --- NNs. N y 2. cl W N. o co11011, tito-, Wdr o C7 p, C7 a1rs° bd Q 4., 11% 4 a'i a• g o u WQLTh asa) Ua) 4it A., li. 1 '... el ti F' Q N E.., a t eti, of 64 MI 3 mss t pirlel .. I j v J f fA; 1v':y ;} t, l ja Yt 1 AO. c l. t w} i ' czi4 iii: : N r t—•4 rrnr'.....i a) z Q ,earb t, i `Tt CLQ G, i :r l'. •v, I.--< .. i, W W I r yyy k• vi. / O y t. ta . !, 1 , 6*- r7.'_;t, t,. cg i y 4LJ! t.: t' tit :U 3177;4 1 rIr. a 01; 1 ,..1.z\‘ 1' ' .1, ,/- .r. es R. bb r r t s S, ±11 2* ••ak S3, N Ntn 3 a)f. . . i'114`... i.....:... : -vt..., . k211 411) en Fj a):{ i tt ) lj y. Zr Q! Jl, • ,oaR' •,,,, 1 11 1'. iii, O• n t " 7 f t ir U tot '71 W A t 1 Current prc)Je t area A Lige k't raised 4 tit i N, i i *' /` I lilt partes i t ' IN t i4 N i i i ; 1 i t A.,'1 i fr si i iN. I CURRENT Vt , t%PROJECT AREA 1„...!....--------- 1 4.-.---..- ---— 1 r.. 1_ut i A is \ c, c i i i kaps,Atant Nut k' Arra of ht•tor. habitation teature3 I' ,11,r 4tat4t)tl Enclosure 6: Map Showing Location of Site 25547, Current Housing Project Area Shaded Yellow and Nelson et al. (2006)Project Area Shaded Gray(Adapted from Nelson et al. 2006:13). Section 3 boulders \ t; i 2 ti( r n m r, 411 13, yf Section 2•-apt erucal beJruk«aik 1 fry Section 1 v Step slope Stat.ked 3 Enclosure 7: Site 25547 Plan View Map(Nelson et al. 2006: 14). an•c 1 ol ar+r a cc —\ \ E t 1I1770u821001.41Wwna- ga:ya j 8N 2 =s, 1,., V so.. 1 „. c , , It II :!..,'ON Pik. . j 03 k 1i-it1 i L4 , A IA; 1111 tri 01 s r«V 7nyn Gash otC Oo00aNN et .i, l* t Pz y` ff' aaawas til i 1• ca: tom! I t t• /-'C- -- i+r o.y i_ -.L-_ e j •a ` i7 t• 4. f Fn ed 14gd t'f 3 1 Fm's #_ v i ;- t zr ctsrit1i °,i W i ; i tj a it= i ; : a I "di x u 1 i 11 t= Viai $ ti 8 f O r Y a .1 II it a F t; S. et 0 8Jm°iphdw m3 i i 4 cd o ni;:Y S N7qO i o iu gg 0. c M M.« 4a O F 3 1 R., ‘14wb ' .: Fv i— Fo8t= F i 2 i i 3, toI li it U 0 t o Y S, b, F ; , 1 f f t{[ l. Syr Gl3Jx_ sr aooro N t ii a; i s i ,: a 3• 7r 1 3';1,E af ti' s;i 2 a ® 'c \ N tom or f ralt411.111461111111.. a 7. • FJ J y •. tph• A ii R : it ; ` i,°,1 e) 4 ,0 L ,. Zowt f 00ilkS w.pi ..,3 w. _ .«$gid«"o SUZANNE D. CASE DAVID Y, IGE CHAIRPERSON GOVEKNOR OP DOARDOF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCLS COM RESOURCEMANAC IAWAII ROBERTK MASUD4 FIRST DEPUTY ynd and M KALEO MANUEL DEPLTY DRECTOR - WATER AQUATI RENOXRCES BOATING AND OCEAN RF CREATION BLREAU O CONVEYANCFS ION ON WATER RESOLRCE MANACIEMENT CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS CONSERVATION AND RESORCES ENPORCIMENT STATE OF HAWAII ENGNEERNO FORESTRY AND WIDUFE DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION KAROOLAWE ISI AND RENERVE COMMSSION LAND STATE PARKS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION KAKUHIHEWA BUILDING 60] KAMOKILA BLVD, STE SSS KAPOLEL, HI 96707 May 11, 2022 IN REPLY REFER TO Susan Kunz, Housing Administrator Project No.: 2021 PR00880 County of Hawaii Doc. No.: 2205SN01 Office of Housing and Comnunity Development Archaeology 1990 Kinoole Street, Suite 102 Hilo, HI 96720 Email: Susan .Kunz@hawaiicounty gov Dear Ms. Kunz SUBJECT Chapter 6E-42 and National Historic Preseryation Act Section 106 Review Kaiaulu OKapi olani Housing Project Request for Concurrence with Project Effect Determination Archaeoological Inventory Survey Kakdau lst Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i TMK: (3) 2-4-025: :048, 053, and 080 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SHPD's) review of the Kaidulu. O Kapi'olani Housing Project. SHPD received the initial project submission on July 26, 2021. The submittal consisted of an archacological assessment titled, An Archaeological Assessment for a 0,.6447-acre Property in Kukiau 1' Ahupua'a, South Hilo Districr, Hawai 'i Island, Hawai'i TMK (3)2-4-025: *080 (Escott 2019a, revised March 2022) prepared on behalf of the Urban Housing Communities, LLC., a cultural impact assessment (Escott 2019) for parcel 080 and an archaeological summary letter report (Escott 2019b) that indicated the project area includes parcels 048, 053, and 080 (Submission No. 2021PR00880. 001). The submission indicated the landowner is Mr. Giampaolo Boschetti and that Urban Housing Communities, LLC, is managing the proposed project. On July 26, 2021, SHPD requested additional information, indicating that if federal funds were being used, our office looked forward to receiving a letter fron the appropriate agency initiating NHPA Section 106 consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In response, SHPD received a letter dated March 2, 2022, from the Office of Housing and Community Developinent (OHCD) indicating that the project was seeking funding from the U.S. Department of Urban Housing (HUD) and that OHCD is the County agency responsible for compliance with HRS 6E statutes and the Section 106 consultation. OHCD provided a project overview, identification of the HRS 6E and federal area of potential effect (APE), which are synonymous, previous archaeological studies and findings, and requested the SHPO 's concurrence with a finding of no historic properties affected pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1) for the proposed undertaking, The SHPD received this letter on March 4, 2022, along with a letter dated February 9, 2022, from the archacological consultant (Glenn Escott) to the OHCD, summanizing the archacological studies undertaken and the Scction 106 consultation effort (Submission No. 2021PR00880. .003), OHCD indicates that the proposed project is the development of an affordable rental complex of 64-units, community center and 117-stall parking lot. The project consists of the construction of nine (9) residential units and will include grubbing, grading, and trenching for utility infrastructure. The project area and area of potential effect (APE) and project area includes the entirety of TMK: (3) 2-4- -025:048, 053, and 080. Ground disturbance consists of grubbing, grading, and trenching within the entire 5.0499-acre project area. Acrial photographs show the project area is mostly undeveloped land, Susan Kunz 05/11/2022 Page 2 SHPD records confirm that portions of the current project area/APE were included in an archaeological survey (AIS Nelson et a1. 2006) conducted by Rechtman Consulting, LLC for a previous waterline project. Nelson et al. (2006) identified a single historic property, a historic enclosure (Site 50-10-35- -25547) within TMK: (3) 2-4 -025:048. They indicated it was significant under HAR $13-284 -6 Criterion d, as having yielded information about historic animal husbandry features, that it was adequately documented during the AlS and, thus, they recommended no further archaeological work, SHPD concurred with the findings and recommendations and accepted the AlS report on September 28, 2006 (Log No. 2006.3275, Doc. No. 0609JT83) Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted the current AlS for the easement portion of the project area/APE [TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080]. Escott (2019a) indicates the AIS involved a 100% coverage pedestrian survey of the easement and that no historic properties were identified, thus the negative findings are presented in an archacological assessment (AA) report in accordance with HAR $13. -284-5(b)(5)(A) SHPD requested revisions via email [Susan Lebo (SHPD) to Glenn Escott (SCS)] for the AA (Escott 2019a) on March 20, 2022, On April 4, 2022, SHPD received from SCS the revised AA report (Escott, March 2022) and a letter dated March 24, 2022, summarizing the revisions (Submission No. 2021PR00880 007). On the same day SHPD also received a letter dated March 23, 2022, from OHCD requesting SHPD's concurtence with a determination of "'No Historic Properties Affected" pursuant to HAR 813- -284-7(a)(1), along with plans showing the limits of proposed disturbance, a current land use map (Submission No. 2021PR00880. 005), and a HRS 6E Submittal Form (Submission No. 2021PR00880 .006) The OHCD and SCS submissions indicate that no historic properties were identified during current AIS (Escott 2019; revised March 2022) conducted within TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080, and that the single historic property (Site 50- 10-35-25547) was identified previously within TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048. Additionally, Site 50- -10-35-25547 (historic enclosure) and that SHPD concurred that this site had been adequately documented. The OHCD and SCS submissions also indicate that nineteen (19) historic properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) were identified with a one-half mile radius of the current project area/APE. However, the project will have no direct or indirect (c.g., visual) impacts of these eligible historic properties. Based on the information provided, the SHPO concurs with the OHCD's determination of no historic properties affected for the proposed undertaking pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5(b). Additionally, SHPD concurs with OHCD's determination of "No historic properties affected pursuant to HAR $13- -275-7(a)(1). The NHPA Section 106 and the HRS 6E historic preservation review processes are concluded. The project initiation process may_proceed The OHCD is the office of record for this project. Please maintain a copy of this letter with your environmental review record for this undertaking. The revised AA report meets the minimum requirements of HAR $13-276-5. It is accepted. Please send two hard copies of the report, clearly marked FINAL, along with a text-searchable PDF copy of the report and a copy of this review letter to the Kapolei SHPD office, attention SHPD library Please also submit a text-searchable PDF copy of the report to HICRIS Project No. 2022PR00880 using the Project Supplement option, and a PDF copy of the report to SHPD at Lchua,K Soares @hawaii, gov Please note: In the unlikely event that subsurface historic resources, including human skeletal remains, structural remains, cultural deposits, artifacts, native sand deposits, or sink holes are identified during the demolition and/or construction work, cease work in the immediate vieinity of the find, protect the find from additional disturbance, and contact the State Historic Preservation Division, at (808) 933- -7651 Please contact Sean Naleimaile, Hawaii Island Archaeologist IV at Sean.P. Naleimaile ahawaii, gov for any matters regarding archaeological resources or this letter. Susan Kunz 05/11/2022 Page 2 Aloha, Alan Downer Alan S. Downer, PhD Administrator, State Historic Preservation Division Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Rachel Okojit, rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii .com CC. Glenn Escott, ggescott@yahoo.com Exhibit 12: Noise Abatement and Control Noise (EA Level Reviews) General requirements Legislation Regulation HUD’s noise regulations protect residential properties from excessive noise exposure. HUD encourages mitigation as appropriate. Noise Control Act of 1972 General Services Administration Federal Management Circular 75-2: “Compatible Land Uses at Federal Airfields” Title 24 CFR 51 Subpart B References https://www.hudexchange.info/programs/environmental-review/noise-abatement-and- control 1. What activities does your project involve? Check all that apply: New construction for residential use NOTE: HUD assistance to new construction projects is generally prohibited if they are located in an Unacceptable zone, and HUD discourages assistance for new construction projects in Normally Unacceptable zones. See 24 CFR 51.101(a)(3) for further details. à Continue to Question 2. Rehabilitation of an existing residential property NOTE: For major or substantial rehabilitation in Normally Unacceptable zones, HUD encourages mitigation to reduce levels to acceptable compliance standards. For major rehabilitation in Unacceptable zones, HUD strongly encourages mitigation to reduce levels to acceptable compliance standards. See 24 CFR 51 Subpart B for further details. à Continue to Question 2. A research demonstration project which does not result in new construction or reconstruction, interstate, land sales registration, or any timely emergency assistance under disaster assistance provisions or appropriations which are provided to save lives, protect property, protect public health and safety, remove debris and wreckage, or assistance that has the effect of restoring facilities substantially as they existed prior to the disaster à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. None of the above à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. 2.Complete the Preliminary Screening to identify potential noise generators in the vicinity (1000’ from a major road, 3000’ from a railroad, or 15 miles from an airport). Indicate the findings of the Preliminary Screening below: There are no noise generators found within the threshold distances above. à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide a map showing the location of the project relative to any noise generators. Noise generators were found within the threshold distances. à Continue to Question 3. 3.Complete the Noise Assessment Guidelines to quantify the noise exposure. Indicate the findings of the Noise Assessment below: Acceptable: (65 decibels or less; the ceiling may be shifted to 70 decibels in circumstances described in §24 CFR 51.105(a)) Indicate noise level here: à Based on the response, the review is in compliance with this section. Continue to the Worksheet Summary below. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Normally Unacceptable: (Above 65 decibels but not exceeding 75 decibels; the floor may be shifted to 70 decibels in circumstances described in 24 CFR 51.105(a)) Indicate noise level here: If project is rehabilitation: à Continue to Question 4. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. If project is new construction: Is the project in a largely undeveloped area1? No à Continue to Question 4. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis, and any other relevant information. 1 A largely undeveloped area means the area within 2 miles of the project site is less than 50 percent developed with urban uses and does not have water and sewer capacity to serve the project. X 45 Yes àYour project requires completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to 51.104(b)(1)(i). Elevate this review to an EIS- level review. Unacceptable: (Above 75 decibels) Indicate noise level here: If project is rehabilitation: HUD strongly encourages conversion of noise-exposed sites to land uses compatible with high noise levels. Consider converting this property to a non- residential use compatible with high noise levels. à Continue to Question 4. Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis, and any other relevant information. If project is new construction: Your project requires completion of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to 51.104(b)(1)(i). You may either complete an EIS or provide a waiver signed by the appropriate authority. Indicate your choice: Convert to an EIS à Provide noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 4. Provide waiver à Provide an Environmental Impact Statement waiver from the Certifying Officer or the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development per 24 CFR 51.104(b)(2) and noise analysis, including noise level and data used to complete the analysis. Continue to Question 4. 4.HUD strongly encourages mitigation be used to eliminate adverse noise impacts. Explain in detail the exact measures that must be implemented to mitigate for the impact or effect, including the timeline for implementation. This information will be automatically included in the Mitigation summary for the environmental review. Mitigation as follows will be implemented: à Provide drawings, specifications, and other materials as needed to describe the project’s noise mitigation measures. Continue to the Worksheet Summary. No mitigation is necessary. Explain why mitigation will not be made here: à Continue to the Worksheet Summary. Worksheet Summary Compliance Determination Provide a clear description of your determination and a synopsis of the information that it was based on, such as: •Map panel numbers and dates •Names of all consulted parties and relevant consultation dates •Names of plans or reports and relevant page numbers •Any additional requirements specific to your region Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Yes No Please see attached map. The nearest roadway is over 1,200 feet away. There are no railroads in the vicinity of the site, the nearest railroad (train museum) is located over 100,000 feet away. The nearest airport is 52,000 feet away. Distance from Site: Hilo International: 3.5 miles Mauna Kea – Honolii Airport: 5.2 miles Pepeekeo Airstrip: approx. 9 miles Bradshaw Army Airport: 37 miles Waimea-Kohala Airport: 58 miles Puu Waa Waa Ranch: 62 miles Kaalaiki Airport: 62 miles Kona International: 75 miles Upolu Airport: 94 miles PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Distance to Airports Distance from Site: Hwy 200: 7.2 miles Hwy 19: 0.67 miles Komohana StL 0.62 miles PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Distance to Roadways PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Hilo Road and Aviation Noise Map Hilo Road and Aviation Noise Map Bureau of Transportation Statistics, VOLPESources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS,FAO,NPS,NRCAN,GeoBase,IGN,Kadaster NL,OrdnanceSurvey,Esri Japan,METI,Esri China (Hong Kong),(c)OpenStreetMap contributors,andtheGISUserCommunity Hawaii Road and Aviation Noise 35 - 40 40.01 - 45 45.01 - 50 50.01 - 55 55.01 - 60 60.01 - 65 65.01 - 70 70.01 - 75 75.01 - 80 80.01 - 85 85.01 - 90 90.01 - 95 August 19, 2019 0 1.5 30.75 mi 0 2.5 51.25 km 1:72,224 Bureau of Transportation Statistics, VOLPE | Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, METI/NASA,NGA,EPA,USDA| Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Distance from Site: Hilo International: 3.5 miles Mauna Kea – Honolii Airport: 5.2 miles Pepeekeo Airstrip: approx. 9 miles Bradshaw Army Airport: 37 miles Waimea-Kohala Airport: 58 miles Puu Waa Waa Ranch: 62 miles Kaalaiki Airport: 62 miles Kona International: 75 miles Upolu Airport: 94 miles PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Distance to Airports Distance from Site: Hwy 200: 7.2 miles Hwy 19: 0.67 miles Komohana StL 0.62 miles PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Distance to Roadways Exhibit 13: Sole Source Aquifers / Safe Drinking Water (QYLURQPHQWDO$VVHVVPHQW.DLDXOX2:DLNRORD3XD0HOLD6WUHHW:DLNRORD+DZDLL 67370. 3 636ROH6RXUFH$TXLIHUPROJECT NAME:FIGURE TITLE: PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street Hilo, Hawaii 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE NAME: TMK Map FIGURE NUMBER: 2 ReportCountyDepartment ofWater Supply...Water, Our Most Precious Resource...You may also access your 2018 Hilo Water Quality Report online at:https://www.hawaiidws.org/CCRSHilo2018.pdfWhere does my water come from?The sources of water that are normally used for the Hilo Water System are Pana‘ewa Well Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Pi‘ihonua Well Nos. A, B, and C, Saddle Road Well “A”, and the UH Hilo Well (all of which are groundwater sources). These source(s) may change depending on the supply and demand.Water Conservation TipsDid you know that the average U.S. household uses approximately 400 gallons of water per day or 100 gallons per person per day? Luck-ily, there are many low-cost and no-cost ways to conserve water. Small changes can make a big difference - try one today and soon it will become second nature.• Take short showers - a 5 minute shower uses 4 to 5 gallons of water compared to up to 50 gallons for a bath.• Use a water-efficient showerhead. They’re inexpensive, easy to install, and can save you up to 750 gallons a month.• Shutting off water while brushing your teeth, washing your hair, and shaving could save up to 500 gallons a month.• Run your clothes washer and dishwasher only when they are full. You can save up to 1,000 gallons a month.• Water plants only when necessary.• Fix leaky toilets and faucets. Faucet washers are inexpensive and take only a few minutes to replace. To check your toilet for a leak, place a few drops of food coloring in the tank and wait. If it seeps into the toilet bowl without flushing, you have a leak. Fixing it or replacing it with a new, more efficient model can save up to 1,000 gallons a month.• Teach your kids about water conservation to ensure a future generation that uses water wisely. Make it a family effort to reduce next month’s water bill!For more information,visit us at www.hawaiidws.org& follow the conservation links or visit www.epa.gov/watersenseSource WaterAssessment ProgramIn 2004, the preliminary source water assessment report was released. The purpose of the source water assessment report is to enable the public and deci-sion-makers to make well-founded decisions for the protection and preservation of our drinking water. The source water assessment report identifies the potential contaminating activities for each source of water.In the report, Hilo Water System sources are poten-tially vulnerable to contaminants associated with the following activities: roads, septic tanks, cesspools, sewer lines, injection wells, residential parcel, cul-tivated agriculture, and sugarcane. Note: the list of potential contaminating activities has not necessarily been associated with anything found in the water. For more information, please contact Kawika Uyehara, P.E., at 961-8670.How can I get involved?The Water Board meets the fourth Tuesday of every month. Call for the time and location of the meeting. You Can Contact Usat the Following Numbers: Administration/Finance/General .......(808) 961-8050 Billing/Customer Service ....................(808) 961-8060 Engineering .........................................(808) 961-8070 Emergencies & Field Operations ........(808) 961-8790 Water Quality .......................................(808) 961-8670The Department of Water Supply is an equal opportunity provider and employer What is the purpose of the Water Quality Report?List of Abbreviations:CCR ..........Consumer Confidence ReportCDC .........Center for Disease Control & PreventionEPA ..........Environmental Protection AgencyHDWS ......Hawai‘i Department of Water SupplyWhat is the purpose of the Water Quality Report?The EPA is responsible for making sure that public water supplies within the United States are safe. In 1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act in order to protect the nation’s public drinking water supply. This law gives the EPA authority to set the standards for drinking water quality (to determine what levels of contaminants are safe to have in the water) and to oversee the states and water suppliers who implement these standards.The EPA requires community water systems to deliver a CCR, also known as an annual drinking Water Quality Report, to their customers. These reports provide information to customers about their drinking water quality for the past year. All water quality reports must contain certain content elements and must be made available each year by July 1st for the preceeding year.The EPA determines what levels of contaminants are safe to have in the water, and the water quality report will show customers how the levels of contaminants in their water source compare to the EPA standard.The water system must provide the EPA standard in the data table for each regulated contaminant detected. The customer can then compare the level of contaminants in their water to the EPA standard.Is my water safe?Yes it is. Last year, as in years past, our tap water met all U.S. EPA and State drinking water health standards. HDWS vigilantly safeguards its water supplies and once again we are proud to report that we have complied with all drinking water standards.Why are there contaminantsin my drinking water?Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline 1-(800) 426-4791. If you have any questions regarding this Water Quality Report, please call Kawika Uyehara, P.E., at 961-8670.Do I need to take special precautions?Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EPA/CDC guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 1-(800) 426-4791.Sources of drinking waterThe sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally-occurring minerals and, in some cases, radio-active material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity.Contaminants that may be present in source water include:•Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacte-ria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife.•Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, which can be naturally-occurring or result from urban stormwater runoff, industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farm-ing.•Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agriculture, urban stormwa-ter runoff, and residential uses.•Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are byproducts of industrial processes and petroleum production, and can also come from gas stations, urban stormwater runoff, and septic systems.•Radioactive contaminants, which can be naturally-occur-ring or be the result of oil and gas production and mining activities.In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, the EPA prescribes regulations which limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. Food and Drug Administration reg-ulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water which must provide the same protection for public health.Water Quality Report OnlineThis year, you are likely reading the report online, rather than the traditional paper copy sent by mail. The EPA recently changed the requirements to allow utilities to communicate this important information digitally.Customers are still able to request a paper copy and can do so by the following methods. (Please provide us with your account number, phone number, mailing or email address, and water system name so that we can provide you with the correct report.): • Call us at (808) 961-8670• Email us at dws@hawaiidws.org• Write to us at: Department of Water Supply/Micro Lab 889 Leilani Street Hilo, HI 96720Lead and drinking waterIf present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing and not usually from the source water. HDWS is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting in your home plumbing undisturbed for several hours, you can minimize the potential Ior lead e[posure E\ ÁushinJ \our tap Ior seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking.If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may choose to have your water tested by contacting private laEoratories that are certified E\ the 6tate Ior doinJ drinking water analyses. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead. You can also contact the National Lead Information Center at /($' which proYides the Jeneral public and professionals with information about lead, lead hazards, and their prevention.Sodium in drinking waterThere is no State or Federal maximum contaminant level for sodium. Monitoring for sodium is performed primarily to gather information for the consumers, the Safe Drinking Water Branch, and HDWS.The EPA Drinking Water Advisory recommends that the sodium concentration in drinking water not exceed a ranJe oI to ppm Eecause oI the possiEle adYerse effects on taste at higher concentrations. For persons on a sodium-restricted diet, sodium concentrations greater than 120 ppm could be problematic. If you are on a sodium-restricted diet, you should consult your physician about the level of sodium in the drinking water.2018 Water Quality Report 2018 Hilo System Water Quality Data TablesThe table below lists the drinking water contaminants that we detected during the calendar year of this report. The presence of contaminants in the water does not necessarily indicate that the water poses a health risk. Unless otherwise noted, the data presented in this table is from testing done in the calendar year of the report. The EPA or the State requires us to monitor for certain contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change frequently. Some of our data, though representative, are more than one year old.Regulated Contaminant Data TablesRegulated ContaminantsHilo Water SystemContaminants (units)MCLMCLGALLevelFoundRange ofDetectionsSampleDateViolationTypical Source of ContaminantInorganic ContaminantsCopper-source water (ppm)n/an/a1.30.00086ND - 0.004302017NoCorrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits.Chromium (ppb)100100n/a0.26ND - 1.302017NoErosion of natural deposits.Nitrate (ppm)1010n/a0.400.33 - 0.402018NoRunoff from fertilizer use; leaching from septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural deposits.Lead and Copper Rule ComplianceHilo Water SystemContaminant (units)ALMCLGLevel Found# of sites > ALSample DateViolationTypical Source of ContaminantCopper (ppm)1.31.30.09550/352016NoCorrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits.The 90th percentile value of copper is reported as the level found.Key definitionsof termsused in this report•MCLG = Maximum Contaminant Level Goal: The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety.•MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level: The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as fea-sible using the best available treatment technology.•AL = Action Level: The concentration of a contam-inant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements which a water system must follow.•ppm = Parts per million. One ppm corresponds to a single penny in $10,000 or one minute in two years.•ppb = Parts per billion. One ppb corresponds to a single penny in $10,000,000 or about one minute in two thousand years.•ND = Not Detected: If a contaminant is not mea-sured at or above its minimum detection limit, it is reported as Not Detected - detection limits are available upon request.•n/a = not applicable 2018 Hilo System Water Quality Data Tables (continued)Unregulated Contaminant Data TablesUCMR3 - Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule [UCMR](Not Regulated by State or Federal Government)Hilo Water SystemContaminants (units)LevelFoundRange ofDetectionsSampleDateViolationTypical Source of ContaminantUnregulated ContaminantsTotal Chromium (ppb)*1.10.77 - 1.12014NoErosion of natural deposits.Hexavalent Chromium [Chromium-6] (ppb)1.20.87 - 1.22014NoNaturally occurring element.Molybdenum (ppb)1.3ND - 1.32014NoNaturally occurring element.Strontium (ppb)35.017.0 - 35.02014NoNaturally occurring element.Vanadium (ppb)26.07.4 - 26.02014NoNaturally occurring elemental metal.The 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) amendments require that once every five years the EPA issue a new list of no more than 30 unregulated contaminants to be monitored by public water systems (PWSs). UCMR3 was published on May 2, 2012 and is the third list of contaminants. These contaminants do not have health-based standards, MCLs, or MCLGs set under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). UCMR benefits public health and the environment by providing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other interested parties with scientifically valid data on the occurrence of these contaminants in the drinking water. This data set is one of the primary sources of occurrence and exposure information the EPA uses to develop future regulatory decisions and actions to protect public health. *Total Chromium is a regulated contaminant and also one of the contaminants tested in UCMR3. The MCL and MCLG for Total Chromium is 100 ppb.Sodium (Not Regulated by State or Federal Government)Hilo Water SystemContaminants (units)MCLMCLGLevelFoundRange ofDetectionsSampleDateViolationTypical Source of ContaminantInorganic ContaminantsSodium (ppm)nonenone10.05.9 - 10.02017NoErosion of natural deposits. Exhibit 14: Wetlands Protection PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Wetland Map Kaiulu O Kapiolani wetlands U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Standards and Support Team,wetlands_team@fws.gov Wetlands Estuarine and Marine Deepwater Estuarine and Marine Wetland Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland Freshwater Pond Lake Other Riverine August 9, 2019 0 0.3 0.60.15 mi 0 0.5 10.25 km 1:19,111 This page was produced by the NWI mapper National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) This map is for general reference only. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is not responsible for the accuracy or currentness of the base data shown on this map. All wetlands related data should be used in accordance with the layer metadata found on the Wetlands Mapper web site. Exhibit 15: Wild and Scenic Rivers PROJECT NAME: Environmental Assessment Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Kapiolani Street and Kakuau Street Hilo, Hawaii, 96720 TMKs (3) 2-4-025:048,053,080 FIGURE TITLE: Wild and Scenic Rivers Exhibit 16: Environmental Justice 8/8/2019 EJSCREEN Report https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/ejscreen_SOE.aspx 1/3 EJSCREEN Report (Version 2018) 1 mile Ring Centered at 19.713576,-155.087180 HAWAII, EPA Region 9 Approximate Population: 9,684 Input Area (sq. miles): 3.14 Kaiulu O Kapiolani Selected Variables Percentile in State Percentile in EPA Region Percentile in USA EJ Indexes EJ Index for Particulate Matter (PM 2.5)N/A N/A N/A EJ Index for Ozone N/A N/A N/A EJ Index for NATA* Diesel PM 93 57 74 EJ Index for NATA* Air Toxics Cancer Risk 85 72 86 EJ Index for NATA* Respiratory Hazard Index 87 65 81 EJ Index for Traffic Proximity and Volume 48 54 74 EJ Index for Lead Paint Indicator 81 74 85 EJ Index for Superfund Proximity 29 41 63 EJ Index for RMP Proximity 93 79 89 EJ Index for Hazardous Waste Proximity 68 61 80 EJ Index for Wastewater Discharge Indicator N/A 73 76 EJ Index for the Selected Area Compared to All People's Blockgroups in the State/Region/US EJ Indexes PM 2.5 Ozone NATA Diesel PM NATA Cancer Risk NATA Respiratory HI Traffic Proximity Lead Paint Indicator Superfund Proximity RMP Proximity Hazardous Waste Proximity Wastewater Discharge IndicatorPercentile0 25 50 75 100 State Percentile Regional Percentile USA Percentile This report shows the values for environmental and demographic indicators and EJSCREEN indexes. It shows environmental and demographic raw data (e.g., the estimated concentration of ozone in the air), and also shows what percentile each raw data value represents. These percentiles provide perspective on how the selected block group or buffer area compares to the entire state, EPA region, or nation. For example, if a given location is at the 95th percentile nationwide, this means that only 5 percent of the US population has a higher block group value than the average person in the location being analyzed. The years for which the data are available, and the methods used, vary across these indicators. Important caveats and uncertainties apply to this screening-level information, so it is essential to understand the limitations on appropriate interpretations and applications of these indicators. Please see EJSCREEN documentation for discussion of these issues before using reports. 8/8/2019 EJSCREEN Report https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/ejscreen_SOE.aspx 2/3 Sites reporting to EPA Superfund NPL 0 Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDF)0 Selected Variables Value State Average Percentile in State EPA Region Average Percentile in EPA Region USA Average Percentile in USA Environmental Indicators Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 in µg/m3)N/A N/A N/A 10.1 N/A 9.53 N/A Ozone (ppb)N/A N/A N/A 48.3 N/A 42.5 N/A NATA* Diesel PM (µg/m3)0.338 0.15 90 0.978 <50th 0.938 <50th NATA* Air Toxics Cancer Risk (risk per MM)38 34 78 43 <50th 40 <50th NATA* Respiratory Hazard Index 1.3 1 77 2 <50th 1.8 <50th Traffic Proximity and Volume (daily traffic count/distance to road)50 1000 38 1100 29 600 40 Lead Paint Indicator (% pre-1960s housing)0.24 0.16 72 0.24 60 0.29 56 Superfund Proximity (site count/km distance)0.0027 0.096 6 0.14 1 0.12 0 RMP Proximity (facility count/km distance)0.98 0.37 89 0.97 69 0.72 76 Hazardous Waste Proximity (facility count/km distance)0.59 1.4 57 2.8 37 4.3 54 Wastewater Discharge Indicator (toxicity-weighted concentration/m distance)0 0.04 N/A 12 59 30 40 Demographic Indicators Demographic Index 71%51%94 47%82 36%89 Minority Population 84%78%51 59%74 38%86 Low Income Population 57%25%94 35%80 34%84 Linguistically Isolated Population 3%6%51 8%37 4%64 Population with Less Than High School Education 10%9%68 17%42 13%49 Population under Age 5 6%6%45 6%43 6%47 Population over Age 64 15%16%48 13%69 14%61 *The National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) is EPA's ongoing, comprehensive evaluation of air toxics in the United States. EPA developed the NATA to prioritize air toxics, emission sources, and locations of interest for further study. It is important to remember that NATA provides broad estimates of health risks over geographic areas of the country, not definitive risks to specific individuals or locations. More information on the NATA analysis can be found at: https://www.epa.gov/national-air-toxics-assessment. For additional information, see: www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice EJSCREEN is a screening tool for pre-decisional use only. It can help identify areas that may warrant additional consideration, analysis, or outreach. It does not provide a basis for decision- making, but it may help identify potential areas of EJ concern. Users should keep in mind that screening tools are subject to substantial uncertainty in their demographic and environmental data, particularly when looking at small geographic areas. Important caveats and uncertainties apply to this screening-level information, so it is essential to understand the limitations on appropriate interpretations and applications of these indicators. Please see EJSCREEN documentation for discussion of these issues before using reports. This screening tool does not Exhibit 17: Consultation Letters Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of the Army Army Corps of Engineers Honolulu District, Building 230 Fort Shafter, Hawaii 96858-5440 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Valerie T. Poindexter County Council Representative, District 1 25 Aupuni Street, Suite 1402/2402 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism Office of Planning 235 S. Beretania St. 6th Floor Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism Strategic Industries Division 235 S. Beretania Street, 5th Floor Honolulu, HI 96813 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism P.O. Box 2359 Honolulu, Hawaii 96804 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Office of Hawaiian Affairs East Hawaii (Hilo) Wailoa Plaza, Suite 20-CDE 399 Hualani St. Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 State of Hawaii Department of Accounting and General Services - Office of the Comptroller Kalanimoku Building 1151 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 State of Hawaii Department of Agriculture 1428 S. King Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96814 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 State of Hawaii Department of Defense 3949 Diamond Head Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96816 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Hawaii State Department of Education 1390 Miller St. Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 State of Hawaii Department of Hawaiian Home Lands Hale Kalaniana’ole 91-5420 Kapolei Parkway Kapolei, Hawaii 96707 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 300 Ala Moana Blvd. Room 3-122 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Interior, Geological Survey Pacific Islands Water Science Center 1845 Wasp Blvd., B176 Honolulu, Hawaii 96818 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 County of Hawaii Department of Parks and Recreation Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 6 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 County of Hawaii Department of Public Works Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 7 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of the Navy, Pacific Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command 258 Makalapa Drive, Suite 100 Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii 96860-3134 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply 345 Kekuanaoa Street, Suite 20 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Kalanimoku Building 1151 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President DAVID Y. IGE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII SUZANNE D. CASE CHAIRPERSON BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RF.SOURCES COMMISSION ON WATER RF.SOURCE MANAGEMENT s''SS^i^ STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 August 19, 2019 Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Attn: Ms. Rachel Okoji, President 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 via email: rachelokoii@enviroriskhawaii.com Dear Ms. Okoji: SUBJECT:Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Housing Development Project located at South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053, & 080 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments. At this time, enclosed are comments from the (a) Engineering Division and (b) Land Division-Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene.k.nakamura@hawaii.gov. Thank you. Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures ec: Central Files DAVID Y. IGE GOVERNOR OF HAWAII s^^ •^CU^tu LANDD!VIS!OH 2§!SJUL3! AM ^ US STATE OF HAWAII ^f.,iDEFAk| BMEN3TpF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES '^;Ai P:lSO;-'^'.^^^ LAND DIVISION SUZANNE D. CASE CHAIRPERSON BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION ON V. ATER.RHnURCE MANAGEMENT STATE OF H/.WA"' POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 £R^M: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: July 23, 2019 MEMORANDUM DLNR Agencies: .Div. of Aquatic Resources .Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation ^Engineering Division _X_Div. of Forestry & Wildlife _Div. of State Parks ^Commission on Water Resource Management Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands JLLand Division - Hawaii District X Historic Preservation Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Housing Development Project South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053, & 080 Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. Please submit comments by August 14,2019. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417 or by email at darlene.k.nakamura@hawaii.gov. Thank you. ( ) We have no objections. ( ) We have no comments. ( /) Comments are attached. Signed: Print Name: Date: ^_ <ang,C^rtyS. GlKang, Chief Engineer _/_ / /'• Attachments ec: Central Files DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/RusselI Y. Tsuji Ref: Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Housing Development Project TMK(s): (3) 2-4-025:048, 053, & 080 Location: South Hilo, Island of Hawaii Applicant: Environmental Risk Analysis LLC COMMENTS The rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (44CFR), are in effect when development falls within a Special Flood Hazard Area (high risk areas). State projects are required to comply with 44CFR regulations as stipulated in Section 60.12. Be advised that 44CFR reflects the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP. Local community flood ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can be more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards. The owner of the project property and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Zone designation for the project. Flood Hazard Zones are designated on FEMA's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), which can be viewed on our Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (FHAT) (http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT). If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances, please contact the applicable County NFIP coordinating agency below: o Oahu: City and County of Honolulu, Department of Planning and Permitting (808)768-8098. o Hawaii Island: County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works (808) 961-8327. o Maui/Molokai/Lanai County ofMaui, Department of Planning (808) 270-7253. o Kauai: County ofKauai, Department of Public Works (808) 241-4846. Signed: CARTY S. CHANG, CHIEF ENGINEER 1 ^ Date: ^\DAVID Y. IGE SOVERNOR OF HAWAII ^^ SUZANNE D. CASE CHAIRPERSON BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCESCOMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCEMANAGEMENT STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFNCE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: July 23, 2019 MEMORANDUM DLNR Agencies: .Div. of Aquatic Resources JDiv. of Boating & Ocean Recreation ^(.Engineering Division _X_Div. of Forestry & Wildlife Div. of State Parks _X.Commission on Water Resource Management Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands _X Land Division - Hawaii District X Historic Preservation ro ;.^,*-.J '* '__ ,'-'*• t Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu 0 Kapiolani Housing Development Project South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053, & 080 Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. Please submit comments by August 14,2019. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417 or by email at darlene.k.nakamura@hawaii.aov. Thank you. We have no objections. We have no comments. ) Comments are attached. Signed: Print Name: Date: ~7 <^-<y^^)ff^ /'". /4^/' cF/^/'9 Attachments ec: Central Files 7^~7 Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Hawaii Department of Health Environmental Health Administration 2827 Waimano Home Road Hale Ola Building, Room 222 Pearl City, Hawaii 96782-1487 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Transportation Federal Highways Administration, Hawaii Division 300 Ala Moana Blvd, Room 3-306 Box 50206 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850-3306 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Transportation 869 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96813-5097 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President DAVID Y. IGE GOVERNOR JADE T. BUTAY DIRECTOR Deputy Directors LYNN A.S. ARAKI-REGAN DEREK J. CHOW ROSS M. HIGASHI EDWIN H. SNIFFEN STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 IN REPLY REFER TO: DIR 0725 STP 8.2733 August 14, 2019 Ms. Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96738 Dear Ms. Okoji: Subject: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development Environmental Assessment Pre-Assessment Consultation Hilo, Hawaii Island, Hawaii TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053, 080 The State Department of Transportation (DOT) understands A0705 Hilo, L.P. is proposing this 64-unit affordable housing complex. DOT’s comments on the subject project are as follows: Airports Division (DOT-AIR) The proposed location is within five miles from Hilo International Airport (ITO). Therefore, the developers need to be aware of the following: 1. The project area is approximately 1.55 miles from the end of Runway 3 at ITO. All projects within 5 miles from Hawaii State airports are advised to read the Technical Assistance Memorandum (TAM) for guidance with development and activities that may require further review and permits. The TAM can be viewed at this link: http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/docs/TAM-FAA-DOT-Airports_08-01-20 16.pdf 2. Due to the proximity of the airport, there is a potential for fumes, smoke, vibrations, odors, etc. that may result from aircraft flight operations over the proposed housing development. 3. Although the project is located outside of the 55 Day-Night Average Sound Levels noise contours on the ITO 2018 Noise Exposure Map (attached), the Applicant and future residents should be aware of the proximity of the airport and potential single event noise from aircraft operations. 4. The Airport Zoning Act, Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 262 requires DOT-AIR to prevent hazards and non-conforming uses that conflict with the Federal Aviation Ms. Rachel Okoji, M.S. STP 8.2733 August 14, 2019 Page 2 Administration (FAA) Hazardous Wildlife Attractants requirements. DOT-AIR recommends that the proposed housing development construction and operation does not create a wildlife attractant. Please review the FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants On Or Near Airports for guidance. 5. Photovoltaic (PV) systems located in or near the approach path of aircrafts into ITO can create a hazardous condition for pilots due to possible glint and glare reflected from the PV array. If glint or glare from the PV array create a hazardous condition for pilots, the owner of the PV system must be prepared to immediately mitigate the hazard upon notification by DOT-AIR and/or FAA. 6. PV systems have been known to emit radio frequency interference (RFI) to aviation dedicated radio signals, disrupting the reliability of air-to-ground communications. Again, the owner of the PV system must be prepared to immediately mitigate the RFI hazard upon notification by DOT-AIR and/or FAA. Highways Division 1. We note that the Applicant's consultant letter did not include any maps or conceptual drawings; therefore, we do not have any early comments relating to the project layout or access details at this time. 2. A Transportation Assessment (TA) or a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) should be prepared by a traffic engineer licensed in the State of Hawaii and should be included in the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA). a. Both the TA/TIAR and the DEA should include a discussion of any traffic impacts generated by the project onto the nearby State highways and to identify any mitigations that will be required at no cost to the State. 3. The DEA should provide additional details if there are any ancillary uses such as a daycare program. This should be accounted for and reflected in the TIAR's trip generation and anticipated pedestrian patterns. If there are any questions, please contact Mr. Blayne Nikaido of the DOT Statewide Transportation Planning Office at (808) 831-7979 or by email at blayne.h.nikaido@hawaii.gov. Sincerely, JADE T. BUTAY Director of Transportation Attachment for Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, Pacific Islands Contact Office 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Room 5124 Honolulu, Hawaii 96850 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration 135 Nakolo Place Honolulu, Hawaii 96819 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration San Francisco Federal Building 90, 7th Street, Suite 15-300 San Francisco, CA 94103 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 County of Hawaii Hawaii Fire Department 25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2501 Hilo, HI 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 County of Hawaii Mass Transit Agency 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association Pacific Islands Regional Office 1845 Wasp Boulevard Building 176 Honolulu, HI 96818 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of the Interior National Parks Service Pacific West Region – Honolulu 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Room 6-226, Box 50165 Honolulu, HI 96850 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Agriculture National Resources Conservation Service Pacific Islands Area 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Room 4-118 Honolulu, HI 96850 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Office of Hawaiian Affairs Wailoa Plaza 399 Hualani St., Suite 20-CDE Hilo, HI 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 County of Hawaii Planning Department Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President 8/15/2019 Environmental Risk Analysis Mail - EA for Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=e9e89e11a9&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1640784704874209912&simpl=msg-f%3A1640784704874209912&…1/6 Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> EA for Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing 15 messages Sullivan, Kevin <Kevin.Sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:30 AM To: "kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com" <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> Cc: "Mori, Ashley" <Ashley.Mori@hawaiicounty.gov> Aloha Kristen, I am in receipt of the attached but cant find an EA document per se and I am unable to locate on OEQC’s library site:( I only see Kaiaulu-O-Waikoloa Could you please assist/clarify? Mahalo Kevin Sullivan, AICP Planner IV Long Range Division Hawai’i County Planning Department 101 Pauahi St, Ste 3 Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 961-8135 kevin.sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov COR-19-126732.pdf 65K Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:36 AM To: Rachel Okoji <rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com> How should I respond to this? Begin forwarded message: [Quoted text hidden] 8/15/2019 Environmental Risk Analysis Mail - EA for Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=e9e89e11a9&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1640784704874209912&simpl=msg-f%3A1640784704874209912&…2/6 COR-19-126732.pdf 65K Rachel Okoji <rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:42 AM To: Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> Hello Kevin Thank you for your response. We are currently conducting pre-consultation for the referenced project and are requesting any comments for consideration in the draft document. Please let us know if you have any comments for inclusion into the draft EA. Thank you, Rachel Rachel Okoji, M.S. Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 808.783.6840 tel www.enviroriskhawaii.com The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message. From: Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 9:36 AM To: Rachel Okoji Subject: Fwd: EA for Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing [Quoted text hidden] Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:52 AM To: "Sullivan, Kevin" <Kevin.Sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov> Hello Kevin, [Quoted text hidden] Kristen -- Kristen Caskey Environmental Scientist/Environmental Planner Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, HI 96826 Ph: (714) 290-2132 The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information. if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message. Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:55 AM 8/15/2019 Environmental Risk Analysis Mail - EA for Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=e9e89e11a9&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1640784704874209912&simpl=msg-f%3A1640784704874209912&…3/6 To: Rachel Okoji <rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com> Thank you Rachel! Sent from my iPhone [Quoted text hidden] Sullivan, Kevin <Kevin.Sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 3:00 PM To: Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> Mahalo Kristen for clarifying, The Planning Dept would like to be included in distribution of the EA. In meantime, if you have any preliminary site plans, drainage studies or environmental studies you can share with me at this time, I’m happy to review. Otherwise, preliminarily, I would suggest a tree survey for the property as it appears one of the few forest stands left in urbanized Hilo. While it may likely have high percentage of non-natives, be a shame to clear cut it if any healthy trees can be saved; happy to consult with you on that. Mahalo. Look forward to hearing from you. Have a good weekend! Kevin Sullivan, AICP Planner IV Long Range Division Hawai’i County Planning Department 101 Pauahi St, Ste 3 Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 961-8135 kevin.sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov [Quoted text hidden] Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 3:01 PM To: Rachel Okoji <rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com> Begin forwarded message: From: "Sullivan, Kevin" <Kevin.Sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov> [Quoted text hidden] 8/15/2019 Environmental Risk Analysis Mail - EA for Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=e9e89e11a9&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1640784704874209912&simpl=msg-f%3A1640784704874209912&…4/6 Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:57 PM To: Rachel Okoji <rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com> Does this mean we need to conduct a biological/tree survey? [Quoted text hidden] Rachel Okoji <rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:59 PM To: Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> We might. I'll ask our biology sub Thank you, Rachel Rachel Okoji, M.S. Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 808.783.6840 tel www.enviroriskhawaii.com The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message. From: Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 4:57 PM To: Rachel Okoji [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Sullivan, Kevin <Kevin.Sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov>Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:09 AM To: "kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com" <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> Cc: "Mori, Ashley" <Ashley.Mori@hawaiicounty.gov> Kristen, If I otherwise do not hear from you; I’ll assume this is an early consult request only. Thank you Kevin Sullivan, AICP Planner IV Long Range Division Hawai’i County Planning Department 101 Pauahi St, Ste 3 Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 961-8135 kevin.sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov 8/15/2019 Environmental Risk Analysis Mail - EA for Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=e9e89e11a9&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1640784704874209912&simpl=msg-f%3A1640784704874209912&…6/6 [Quoted text hidden] Rachel Okoji <rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 8:56 AM To: Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com> Hi Kristen, Weird, his email today sounds like you didn’t respond to him. You can let him know that the calculations are still being done, but the client will be consulting with the planning department as the project progresses. Thank you, Rachel Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 808.783.6840 tel www.enviroriskhawaii.com The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. Its contents (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient you must not use, disclose, disseminate, copy or print its contents. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete and destroy the message. [Quoted text hidden] Kristen Caskey <kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com>Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 11:43 AM To: "Sullivan, Kevin" <Kevin.Sullivan@hawaiicounty.gov> Sorry for the late reply. We are still waiting on some information from the client on drainage and sewer. However, the client will be in contact with the Planning Department as the project progresses. A cultural study was conducted for the Site, and the archaeologists mentioned several plant species in their report, but there was no mention of Ohia or Koa. The following is the environmental section of the cultural study: SCS Report 1272-1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The project area is situated on level to moderately sloping land at 95 feet (29 meters) above mean sea level (amsl). The project area substrate is a Mauna Loa lava flow dated between 750 and 1,500 years ago (Wolfe and Morris 1996). Soil in the project area is Keaukaha Series (rKFD) extremely rocky muck overlaying pāhoehoe lava (Sato 1973:27). The soil is thin and well drained with 6% to 20% slopes. Annual rainfall ranges from 120 to 160 inches and drains toward the east. There is a narrow drainage area that bisects the middle of the property. Plant communities in the project are dominated by trees, grasses, ferns, and bushes. Tree species include gunpowder (Trema orientalis), autograph (Clusia rosea), banyan (Ficus sp.), guava (Psidium sp.), and bingabing (Macaranga mappa). We will make sure to note the concern for Ohia and Koa on the project Site. We have also contacted USFWS for information on plant and animals species for the Site, but are still waiting on their response. [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 County of Hawaii Hawaii Police Department 349 Kapi’olani Street Hilo, HI 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Land and Natural Resources State Historic Preservation Division Kakuhihewa Building 601 Kamokila Blvd., Suite 555 Kapolei, HI 96707 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Tulsi Gabbard State Representative, District 2 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Room 5-104 Honolulu, HI 96850 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Brian Schatz Senior State Senator 300 Ala Moana Blvd., Room 7-212 Honolulu, HI 96850 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 University of Hawaii Marine Option Program Dean Hall 105A 2450 Campus Road Honolulu, HI 96822 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 University of Hawaii Office of Project Delivery 1960 East-West Road Biomedical Sciences, B-102 Honolulu, HI 96822 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 University of Hawaii Water Resources Research Center 2540 Dole St., Holmes Hall 283 Honolulu, HI 96822 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Chris Todd State Representative, District 2 Hawaii State Capitol, Room 322 415 S Beretania St. Honolulu, HI 96813 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Mark Nakashima State Senator, District 1 Hawaii State Capitol, Room 432 415 S Beretania St. Honolulu, HI 96813 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Postmaster - Hilo Post Office 154 Waianuenue Ave Ste 1 Hilo, HI 96720 Waimea, HI 96796 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 County of Hawaii Department of Environmental Management 345 Kekūanāo’a St., Suite 41 Hilo, HI 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com July 16, 2019 Department of Homeland Security Coast Guard Commander, 14th Coast Guard District 300 Ala Moana Blvd, Room 9-204 Honolulu, HI 96850-4982 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Sir or Madam, Environmental Risk Analysis LLC is conducting an Environmental Assessment to evaluate potential environmental impacts associated with the construction and operation of a proposed housing development on unimproved real property known as Tax Map Keys (TMK) (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080 in Hilo, Hawaii on the island of Hawaii. The proposed action is to build a total of 64 units of affordable housing. The property will consist of a total of 9 buildings, 8 of which will be residential, with one being a community center. The project will be funded in part by the Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation in the form of Federal and State Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), Tax Exempt Bonds, and the State’s Rental Housing Revolving Funds. The tax credits will generate equity investment into the project. These units will address the critical housing shortage issue on the island of Hawaii, and specifically to the city of Hilo. Due to the overwhelming demand for affordable housing, A0705 Hilo, L.P. (project proponent) proposes the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project for the potential to improve the quality of life for residents that cannot afford homes in the area. As the proposed project is in a developed area and has a low potential for adverse environmental impacts, ERA anticipates a Finding of No Significant Impact. Please forward any comments, questions, or concerns within 30 calendar days. Comments can be submitted via email to kristen@enviroriskhawaii.com, or by post to Environmental Risk Analysis LLC, 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826, Attn: Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President DAVID Y IGE JADE T, BUTAY GOVERNOR DIRECTOR Deputy Directors LYNNAS ARAKI-REGAN DEREK J CHOW ROSS M. HIGASHI EDWIN H. SNIFFEN STATE OF HAWAII IN REPLY REFER TO: DIR 0701 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET STP 8.3229 HONOLULU, HAWAII 9681 3-5097 August 2, 2021 Ms. Rachel Okoji President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 Dear Ms. Okoji Subject: Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development Hilo, Hawaii Tax Map Key: (3) 2-4-025: 048, 053, 080 Thank you for your letter dated July 13, 2021 requesting the State of Hawaii Department of Transportation' 's (HDOT) review and comment on the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. HDOT understands the project will consist of the construction of 64 affordable housing units on approximately 5. .05 acres of land in Hilo. Access to the development is proposed to be via Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street. HDOT has the following comments Airports Division (HDOT-A) HDOT-A has reviewed the Draft EA and thanks the developer for addressing the comments previously provided during Pre- -Assessment ConsuItation in letter STP 8.2733 dated August 14 2019. HDOT-A offers the following additional comments 1. The project is approximately 8,213 feet from the end of Runway 3 at the Hilo International Airport. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulation requires the submittal of FAA Form 7460- 1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration pursuant to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 14, Part 77.9, if the construction or alteration is within 20, .000 feet of a public use or military airport which exceeds a 100: I surface from any point on the runway of each airport with its longest runway more than 3. ,200 feet Construction equipment and staging area heights, including heights of temporary construction cranes, shall be included in the submittal. The form and criteria for submittal can be found at the following website https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/externa Ms. Rachel Okoji STP 8.3229 August 2, 2021 Page 2 2. Please be aware that the FAA has updated the Advisory Circular for Wildlife Hazard Attractants. Please review FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200- -33C, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or near Airports for guidance Highways Division (HDOT- -HWY) In 2020, HDOT reviewed and provided comments on the application for an Amendment to Change of Zone for the project site in letter STP 8. 3047 dated October 7, 2020. That application included a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) dated June 21, 2019. The TIAR is cited in the Draft EA, however it has not been included 1, The TIAR assessment was based on the project being fully operational in 2021, however the Draft EA describes a delay until 2023. The Final EA should disclose the TIAR assumption is outdated and should qualitatively assess potential impacts to State highways due to the delay in construction 2. HDOT- -HWY 's 2020 comments on the TIAR remain applicable, and are summarized as follows There would be no direct impact to State highways related to the 64- -unit aA affordable housing development. The project would be accessed from two County roadways (Kapiolani Street and Kukuao Street) and would generate a total of 32 net external trips during the A.M. peak hours of traffic, and 42 net external trips during the P.M. peak hours of traffic b. No State highway intersections were included in the TIAR study area However. the project would not have an indirect adverse impact on State highways because 1) the project- -related trips are low and would be distributed across alternative routes in the region that could avoid the use of State roadways, and 2) the nearest State roadways are Hawaii Belt Road (State Route 19) and Saddle Road (State Route 200), both of which are greater than a mile from the project site. The TIAR does not identify traffic impacts to State highways and no mitigation is warranted or recommended If there are any questions, please contact Mr. Blayne Nikaido of the HDOT Statewide Transportation Planning Office at (808) 831-7979 or via email at blayne.h. .nikaido@hawaii gov Sincerely JADE T. BUTAY Director of Transportation Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 State of Hawaii Department of Transportation 869 Punchbowl Street Honolulu, Hawaii. 96813-5097 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Ms. Jade Butay, Thank you for your review and comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. In response to the comments received. ERA provides the following responses: Airport Division (HDOT-A) 1. FAA Form 7460-1 Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration will be submitted for approval, as necessary, prior to construction commencing. 2. FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33C, Hazardous Wildlife Attractants, updated 2020, will be reviewed. Highways Division (HDOT-HWY) 1. The EA will note the change in operation date, and will qualitatively assess potential impacts to State highways due to the delay in construction. 2. 2020 TIAR comments are acknowledged. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President INTERIOR REGION 9 COLUMBIA–PACIFIC NORTHWEST INTERIOR REGION 12 Pacific Islands Idaho, Montana*, Oregon*, Washington *PARTIAL American Samoa, Guam, Hawaiʻi, Northern Mariana Islands In Reply Refer To: July 19, 2021 01EPIF00-2021-SL-0372 Rachel Okoji Environmental Risk Analysis, LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaiʻi 96826 Subject: Species List for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development, Hilo, Hawaiʻi Dear Rachel Okoji: Thank you for your email of June 25th requesting comment for the development of a Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development, Hilo, Hawaiʻi. We further appreciate your July 12, 2021 email including the link to the Draft Environmental Assessment. The regulatory requirements of 24 CFR 58.4 require units of local governments to assume the responsibility for environmental review, decision‐making, and actions that would otherwise apply to the Department of Housing and Human Development (HUD) under the provisions of NEPA and other provisions of law that further the purposes of NEPA as “responsible entities”. This includes section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as amended. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) understands that the County of Hawaiʻi will administer Federal funding from HUD in support of this project and will therefore act as the responsible entity on behalf of HUD as it pertains to section 7 consultation with the Service. The proposed development site (TMKs [3] 2-4-025:048,053,080) is an undeveloped lot encompassing 5.05 acres in Hilo, on the island of Hawaiʻi. The project proponent, A0705 Hilo, L.P., proposes to develop an affordable rental complex of 64 units, consisting of 32 two-bedroom units, an estimated 24 three-bedroom units, and an estimated 8 four-bedroom units in Hilo. The development will include a community center for resident use and at least 80 parking stalls. This location is already zoned for multi-family dwelling units. Habitat consists mostly of nonnative trees and shrubs. This letter has been prepared under the authority of, and in accordance with, provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) as amended (ESA). We have reviewed United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3-122 Honolulu, Hawaiʻi 96850 Rachel Okoji 2 the information you provided and pertinent information in our files, as it pertains to listed species in accordance with section 7 of the ESA. The Service provides the following comments to assist you in your planning process so that impacts to trust resources can be avoided through site preparation and construction. Our data indicate the following federally listed species may occur or transit through the vicinity of the proposed project area: the threatened Hawaiian goose or nēnē (Branta sandvicensis), the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat or ʻopeʻapeʻa (Lasiurus cinereus semotus), the endangered Hawaiian petrel or ʻuaʻu (Pterodroma sandwicensis), the endangered Hawaiʻi distinct population segment of the band-rumped storm-petrel or ʻakeʻake (Oceanodroma castro), the threatened Newell’s shearwater or ʻaʻo (Puffinus auricularis newelli), the endangered Hawaiian stilt or aeʻo (Himantopus mexicanus knudseni), the endangered Hawaiian coot or ʻalae keʻokeʻo (Fulica alai), and the endangered Blackburn’s sphinx moth (Manduca blackburni). The Hawaiian petrel, band-rumped storm-petrel, and Newell’s shearwater will hereafter, collectively be referred to as “Hawaiian seabirds,” and the Hawaiian stilt and Hawaiian coot will be referred to as “Hawaiian waterbirds.” There is no critical habitat for listed species in the vicinity of this proposed project. The Hawaiian hawk or ʻio (Buteo solitarius), a species that was recently removed from the Federal list of threatened and endangered species, is known to occur in the area. While the Service no longer consults on the Hawaiian hawk, this species is still protected under Hawaiian state regulations (H.R.S. §195D-4) and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703-712). Please see our recommendations below and reference the aforementioned regulations for any additional consultation or mitigation requirements. Hawaiian goose The Hawaiian goose is found on the islands of Hawaiʻi, Maui, Molokaʻi, and Kauaʻi. They are observed in a variety of habitats, but prefer open areas, such as pastures, golf courses, wetlands, natural grasslands and shrublands, and lava flows. Threats to the species include introduced mammalian and avian predators, wind energy facilities, and vehicle strikes. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to the Hawaiian goose we recommend you incorporate the following measures into your project plan: • Do not approach, feed, or disturb the Hawaiian goose. • If a Hawaiian goose is observed loafing or foraging within the project area during the breeding season (September through April), have a biologist familiar with Hawaiian goose nesting behavior survey for nests in and around the project area prior to the resumption of any work. Repeat surveys after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). • Cease all work immediately and contact the Service for further guidance if a nest is discovered within a radius of 150 feet (ft) of proposed project, or a previously undiscovered nest is found within the 150-ft radius after work begins. • In areas where Hawaiian goose are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. Hawaiian hoary bat Rachel Okoji 3 The Hawaiian hoary bat roosts in both exotic and native woody vegetation across all islands and will leave young unattended in trees and shrubs when they forage. If trees or shrubs 15 ft or taller are cleared during the pupping season, there is a risk that young bats could inadvertently be harmed or killed since they are too young to fly or may not move away. Additionally, Hawaiian hoary bats forage for insects from as low as 3 ft to higher than 500 ft above the ground and can become entangled in barbed wire used for fencing. To avoid and minimize impacts to the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plan: • Do not disturb, remove, or trim woody plants greater than 15 ft tall during the bat-birthing and pup-rearing season (June 1 through September 15). • Do not use barbed wire for fencing. Hawaiian seabirds Hawaiian seabirds may traverse the project area at night during the breeding, nesting and fledging seasons (March 1 to December 15). Outdoor lighting could result in seabird disorientation, fallout, and injury or mortality. Seabirds are attracted to lights and after circling the lights they may become exhausted and collide with nearby wires, buildings, or other structures or they may land on the ground. Downed seabirds are subject to increased mortality due to collision with automobiles, starvation, and predation by dogs, cats, and other predators. Young birds (fledglings) traversing the project area between September 15 and December 15, in their first flights from their mountain nests to the sea, are particularly vulnerable to light attraction. To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to seabirds we recommend you incorporate the following measures into your project plan: • Fully shield all outdoor lights so the bulb can only be seen from below. • Install automatic motion sensor switches and controls on all outdoor lights or turn off lights when human activity is not occurring in the lighted area. • Avoid nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 15 through December 15. Hawaiian waterbirds Hawaiian waterbirds are currently found in a variety of wetland habitats including freshwater marshes and ponds, coastal estuaries and ponds, artificial reservoirs, Colocasia esculenta (kalo or taro) loʻi or patches, irrigation ditches, sewage treatment ponds. Hawaiian stilts may also be found wherever ephemeral or persistent standing water may occur. Threats to these species include nonnative predators, habitat loss, and habitat degradation. Based on the project details provided, your project may result in the creation of standing water or open water that could attract Hawaiian waterbirds to the project site. In particular, the Hawaiian stilt is known to nest in sub-optimal locations (e.g., any ponding water), if water is present. Hawaiian waterbirds attracted to sub-optimal habitat may suffer adverse impacts, such as predation and reduced reproductive success, and thus the project may create an attractive nuisance. Therefore, we recommend you work with our office during project planning so that we Rachel Okoji 4 may assist you in developing measures to avoid impacts to listed species (e.g., fencing, vegetation control, predator management). To avoid and minimize potential project impacts to Hawaiian waterbirds we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plan: • In areas where waterbirds are known to be present, post and implement reduced speed limits, and inform project personnel and contractors about the presence of endangered species on-site. • If water resources are located within or adjacent to the project site, incorporate applicable best management practices regarding work in aquatic environments into the project design (see enclosed Aquatic Best Management Practices). • Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species’ biology conduct Hawaiian waterbird nest surveys where appropriate habitat occurs within the vicinity of the proposed project site prior to project initiation. Repeat surveys again within 3 days of project initiation and after any subsequent delay of work of 3 or more days (during which the birds may attempt to nest). If a nest or active brood is found: o Contact the Service within 48 hours for further guidance. o Establish and maintain a 100-ft buffer around all active nests and/or broods until the chicks have fledged. Do not conduct potentially disruptive activities or habitat alteration within this buffer. o Have a biological monitor that is familiar with the species’ biology present on the project site during all construction or earth moving activities until the chicks fledge to ensure that Hawaiian waterbirds and nests are not adversely impacted. Blackburn’s sphinx moth The adult Blackburn’s sphinx moth feeds on nectar from native plants, including Ipomoea pes- caprae (beach morning glory), Plumbago zeylanica (ʻilieʻe), Capparis sandwichiana (maiapilo), and others. Blackburn’s sphinx moth larvae feed on nonnative Nicotiana glauca (tree tobacco), and native, federally listed, Nothocestrum spp. (ʻaiea). To pupate, the larvae burrow into the soil and can remain in a state of torpor for a year or more before emerging from the soil. Soil disturbance can result in death of the pupae. We offer the following survey recommendations to assess whether the Blackburn’s sphinx moth occurs within the project area: • A biologist familiar with the species should survey areas of proposed activities for Blackburn’s sphinx moth and its larval host plants prior to work initiation. o Surveys should be conducted during the wettest portion of the year (usually November-to-April or several weeks after a significant rain) and within 4-to-6 weeks prior to construction. o Surveys should include searches for adults, eggs, larvae, and signs of larval feeding (i.e., chewed stems, frass, or leaf damage). o If moths, eggs, larvae, or native ʻaiea or tree tobacco over 3-ft tall, are found during the survey, please contact the Service for additional guidance to avoid impacts to this species. Rachel Okoji 5 If no Blackburn’s sphinx moth, ʻaiea, or tree tobacco are found during surveys, it is imperative that measures be taken to avoid attraction of Blackburn’s sphinx moth to the project location and prohibit tree tobacco from entering the site. Tree tobacco can grow greater than 3-ft tall in approximately 6 weeks. If it grows over 3-ft tall, the plants may become a host plant for Blackburn’s sphinx moth. We therefore recommend that you: • Remove any tree tobacco less than 3-ft tall. • Monitor the site every 4-to-6 weeks for new tree tobacco growth before, during, and after the proposed ground-disturbing activity. o Monitoring for tree tobacco can be completed by any staff, such as groundskeeper or regular maintenance crew, provided with picture placards of tree tobacco at different life stages. Hawaiian hawk The Hawaiian hawk was recently federally delisted but remains a listed species under Hawaiʻi State law. The Hawaiian hawk is known to occur across a broad range of forest habitats throughout the island of Hawaiʻi. Loud, irregular and unpredictable activities, such as using heavy equipment or building a structure, near an endangered Hawaiian hawk nest may cause nest failure. Harassment of Hawaiian hawk nesting sites can alter feeding and breeding patterns or result in nest or chick abandonment. Nest disturbance can also increase exposure of chicks and juveniles to inclement weather or predators. To avoid and minimize impacts to Hawaiian hawks we recommend you incorporate the following applicable measures into your project plan: • If work must be conducted between March 1 through September 30, during the Hawaiian hawk breeding season, have a biologist familiar with the species conduct a nest search of the project footprint and surrounding areas immediately prior to the start of construction activities. o Pre-disturbance surveys for Hawaiian hawks are only valid for 14 days. If disturbance for the specific location does not occur within 14 days of the survey, conduct another survey. • Clearing of vegetation or construction activities should not occur within 1,600 ft of any active Hawaiian hawk nest during the breeding season until the young have fledged. • Regardless of the time of year, avoid trimming or cutting trees containing a hawk nest, as nests may be re-used during consecutive breeding seasons. Other Measures to Reduce Mortality of Listed Animal Species Additional measures for housing developments common to all listed animal species that will reduce mortality or predation include the following: • Post and enforce low speed limits to reduce vehicle collisions with wildlife. • Require all pets, including cats and dogs, to be on leash at all times outside. • Require garbage cans with lids to reduce populations of rats and mongoose, which are invasive species and prey upon native and endangered species. • Provide signage instructing residents and visitors to avoid approaching, feeding, or disturbing wildlife. Rachel Okoji 6 The Service recommends incorporating all applicable avoidance and minimization measures into your project design to avoid and minimize effects on protected species. If you determine the proposed project may affect federally listed species, we recommend you contact our office early in the planning process so that we may assist you with ESA compliance. We appreciate your efforts to conserve protected species. If you have questions regarding this letter, please contact Melissa Cady, Fish and Wildlife Biologist at 808-933-6963 or melissa_cady@fws.gov. When referring to this project, please include this reference number: 01EPIF00-2021-SL-0372. Sincerely, Island Team Manager Maui Nui and Hawaiʻi Island Enclosure (1): Aquatic Best Management Practices cc: Desiree Moore, Hawaiʻi County Janice Takahashi, HHFDC Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Service Field Office Adminstrative Staff U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Recommended Standard Best Management Practices The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) recommends the following measures to be incorporated into project planning to avoid or minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources. Best Management Practices (BMPs) include the incorporation of procedures or materials that may be used to reduce either direct or indirect negative impacts to aquatic habitats that result from project construction-related activities. These BMPs are recommended in addition to, and do not over-ride any terms, conditions, or other recommendations prepared by the USFWS, other federal, state or local agencies. If you have questions concerning these BMPs, please contact the USFWS Aquatic Ecosystems Conservation Program at 808-792-9400. 1. Authorized dredging and filling-related activities that may result in the temporary or permanent loss of aquatic habitats should be designed to avoid indirect, negative impacts to aquatic habitats beyond the planned project area. 2. Dredging/filling in the marine environment should be scheduled to avoid coral spawning and recruitment periods, and sea turtle nesting and hatching periods. Because these periods are variable throughout the Pacific islands, we recommend contacting the relevant local, state, or federal fish and wildlife resource agency for site specific guidance. 3. Turbidity and siltation from project-related work should be minimized and contained within the project area by silt containment devices and curtailing work during flooding or adverse tidal and weather conditions. BMPs should be maintained for the life of the construction period until turbidity and siltation within the project area is stabilized. All project construction-related debris and sediment containment devices should be removed and disposed of at an approved site. 4. All project construction-related materials and equipment (dredges, vessels, backhoes, silt curtains, etc.) to be placed in an aquatic environment should be inspected for pollutants including, but not limited to; marine fouling organisms, grease, oil, etc., and cleaned to remove pollutants prior to use. Project related activities should not result in any debris disposal, non-native species introductions, or attraction of non-native pests to the affected or adjacent aquatic or terrestrial habitats. Implementing both a litter-control plan and a Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point plan (HACCP – see https://www.fws.gov/policy/A1750fw1.html) can help to prevent attraction and introduction of non-native species. 5. Project construction-related materials (fill, revetment rock, pipe, etc.) should not be stockpiled in, or in close proximity to aquatic habitats and should be protected from erosion (e.g., with filter fabric, etc.), to prevent materials from being carried into waters by wind, rain, or high surf. 6. Fueling of project-related vehicles and equipment should take place away from the aquatic environment and a contingency plan to control petroleum products accidentally spilled during the project should be developed. The plan should be retained on site with the person responsible for compliance with the plan. Absorbent pads and containment booms should be stored on-site to facilitate the clean-up of accidental petroleum releases. 7. All deliberately exposed soil or under-layer materials used in the project near water should be protected from erosion and stabilized as soon as possible with geotextile, filter fabric or native or non-invasive vegetation matting, hydro-seeding, etc. Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 US Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office 300 Ala Moana Blvd, Room 3-122 Honolulu, HI 96850 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Ms. Chelsie Javar-Salas, Thank you for your review and comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. In response to the comments received. ERA provides the following responses: We have incorporated the list of protected species which may occur in the project area provided into the Environmental Assessment, as well as mitigative measures proposed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President 19 DEPARTM ENT OF WATER SUPPLY COUNTY OF HAWAI'I 345 KEKUANAG 'A STREET, SUITE 20 - HILO, HAWAT 196720 TELEPHONE (808) 961- -8050 - FAX (808)961- -8657 July 29, 2021 Ms. Rachel Okoji, President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, HI 96826 Dear Ms. Okoji Subject: Draft Environmental Assessment for Kaiaulu OKapi' 'olani Housing Development Tax Map Key 2-4- -025:048, 053 and 080 We have reviewed the subject Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) and have no comments at this time Should there be any questions, please contact Mr. Ryan Quitoriano of our Water Resources and Planning Branch at 961- -8070, extension 256 Sincerely yours Keith K. Okamoto, P.E Manager-ChiefEngincer RQ:dfg Ka Wai A Kane Water, Our Most Precious Resource The Department of Water Supply is an Equal Opportunity provider and employer Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 County of Hawaii Department of Water Supply 345 Kekuanaoa St, Suite 20 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Mr. Keith Okamoto, Thank you for your review on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. We acknowledge the Department of Water Supply does not have any comments on the proposed project. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 County of Hawaii Department of Pubic Works Aupuni Center 101 Pauahi St, Suite 7 Hilo, Hawaii 96720-4224 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Mr. Alan Thompson, Thank you for your review and comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. In response to the comments received. ERA provides the following responses: 1. All development generated runoff will be collected and diverted to drywells located on site. Site drainage will be submitted for review and approval. 2. All earthwork and grading will be compliant with Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentary Control, of the Hawaii County Code. 3. All driveway connections and construction within Kukuau Street and Kapiolani Street will conform to Chapter 22, County Streets, of the Hawaii County Code. 4. The Environmental Assessment documents the flood zone designation of Zone X. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Mitchell D. Roth Mayor Lee E. Lord Managing Director Kazuo S. K. L. Todd Fire Chief Eric H. Moller Deputy Fire Chief County of Hawai‘i HAWAI‘I FIRE DEPARTMENT 25 Aupuni Street • Suite 2501 • Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720 (808) 932-2900 • Fax (808) 932-2928 Hawai’i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. July 20, 2021 Rachel Okoji Environomental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96826 Attention: Kaiaulu O Kapi‘olani Housing Development Dear Ms Okoji, SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapi‘olani Housing Development. TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048: 053, :080, Hilo Hawai‘i In regards to the above-referenced Environmental Assessment Pre-Assessment Consultation, the following shall be in accordance: NFPA 1, UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 2006 EDITION Note: Hawai‘i State Fire Code, National Fire Protection Association 2006 version, with County of Hawaii amendments. County amendments are identified with a preceding “C~” of the reference code. Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply 18.1 General. Fire department access and water supplies shall comply with this chapter. For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature, or where special hazards exist in addition to the normal hazard of the occupancy, or where access for fire apparatus is unduly difficult, or areas where there is an inadequate fire flow, or inadequate fire hydrant spacing, and the AHJ may require additional safeguards including, but not limited to, additional fire appliance units, more than one type of appliance, or special systems suitable for the protection of the hazard involved. 18.1.1 Plans. 18.1.1.1 Fire Apparatus Access. Plans for fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. Rachel Okoji July 20, 2021 Page 2 18.1.1.2 Fire Hydrant Systems. Plans and specifications for fire hydrant systems shall be submitted to the fire department for review and approval prior to construction. C~ 18.1.1.2.1 Fire Hydrant use and Restrictions. No unauthorized person shall use or operate any Fire hydrant unless such person first secures permission or a permit from the owner or representative of the department, or company that owns or governs that water supply or system. Exception: Fire Department personnel conducting firefighting operations, hydrant testing, and/or maintenance, and the flushing and acceptance of hydrants witnessed by Fire Prevention Bureau personnel. 18.2 Fire Department Access. 18.2.1 Fire department access and fire department access roads shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Section 18.2. 18.2.2* Access to Structures or Areas. 18.2.2.1 Access Box(es). The AHJ shall have the authority to require an access box(es) to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. 18.2.2.2 Access to Gated Subdivisions or Developments. The AHJ shall have the authority to require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system. 18.2.2.3 Access Maintenance. The owner or occupant of a structure or area, with required fire department access as specified in 18.2.2.1 or 18.2.2.2, shall notify the AHJ when the access is modified in a manner that could prevent fire department access. 18.2.3 Fire Department Access Roads. (*may be referred as FDAR) 18.2.3.1 Required Access. 18.2.3.1.1 Approved fire department access roads shall be provided for every facility, building, or portion of a building hereafter constructed or relocated. 18.2.3.1.2 Fire Department access roads shall consist of roadways, fire lanes, parking lots lanes, or a combination thereof. Rachel Okoji July 20, 2021 Page 3 18.2.3.1.3* When not more than two one- and two-family dwellings or private garages, carports, sheds, agricultural buildings, and detached buildings or structures 400ft2 (37 m2) or less are present, the requirements of 18.2.3.1 through 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be modified by the AHJ. 18.2.3.1.4 When fire department access roads cannot be installed due to location on property, topography, waterways, nonnegotiable grades, or other similar conditions, the AHJ shall be authorized to require additional fire protection features. 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A fire department access road shall extend to within in 50 ft (15 m) of at least one exterior door that can be opened from the outside that provides access to the interior of the building. Exception: 1 and 2 single-family dwellings. 18.2.3.2.1.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.1 shall be permitted to be increased to 300 feet. 18.2.3.2.2 Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (46 m) from fire department access roads as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building or facility. 18.2.3.2.2.1 When buildings are protected throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system that is installed in accordance with NFPA 13, NFPA 13D, or NFPA 13R, the distance in 18.2.3.2.2 shall be permitted to be increased to 450 ft (137 m). 18.2.3.3 Multiple Access Roads. More than one fire department access road shall be provided when it is determined by the AHJ that access by a single road could be impaired by vehicle congestion, condition of terrain, climatic conditions, or other factors that could limit access. 18.2.3.4 Specifications. 18.2.3.4.1 Dimensions. C~ 18.2.3.4.1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 20ft with an approved turn around area if the FDAR exceeds 150 feet. Exception: FDAR for one and two family dwellings shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 15 feet, with an area of not less than 20 feet wide within 150 feet of the structure being protected. An approved turn around area shall be provided if the FDAR exceeds 250 feet. Rachel Okoji July 20, 2021 Page 4 C~ 18.2.3.4.1.2 FDAR shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less then 13ft 6 in. C~ 18.2.3.4.1.2.1 Vertical clearances may be increased or reduced by the AHJ, provided such increase or reduction does not impair access by the fire apparatus, and approved signs are installed and maintained indicating such approved changes. 18.2.3.4.1.2.2 Vertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. C~ 18.2.3.4.2 Surface. Fire department access roads and bridges shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads (25 Tons) of the fire apparatus. Such FDAR and shall be comprised of an all-weather driving surface. 18.2.3.4.3 Turning Radius. C~ 18.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 30 feet, and a minimum outside turning radius of 60 feet. 18.2.3.4.3.2 Turns in fire department access road shall maintain the minimum road width. 18.2.3.4.4 Dead Ends. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 ft (46 m) in length shall be provided with approved provisions for the fire apparatus to turn around. 18.2.3.4.5 Bridges. 18.2.3.4.5.1 When a bridge is required to be used as part of a fire department access road, it shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with county requirements. 18.2.3.4.5.2 The bridge shall be designed for a live load sufficient to carry the imposed loads of fire apparatus. 18.2.3.4.5.3 Vehicle load limits shall be posted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade. C~ 18.2.3.4.6.1The maximum gradient of a Fire department access road shall not exceed 12 percent for unpaved surfaces and 15 percent for paved surfaces. In areas of the FDAR where a Fire apparatus would connect to a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection, the maximum gradient of such area(s) shall not exceed 10 percent. Rachel Okoji July 20, 2021 Page 5 18.2.3.4.6.2* The angle of approach and departure for any means of fire department access road shall not exceed 1 ft drop in 20 ft (0.3 m drop in 6 m) or the design limitations of the fire apparatus of the fire department, and shall be subject to approval by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6.3 Fire department access roads connecting to roadways shall be provided with curb cuts extending at least 2 ft (0.61 m) beyond each edge of the fire lane. 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices. The design and use of traffic calming devices shall be approved the AHJ. 18.2.3.5 Marking of Fire Apparatus Access Road. 18.2.3.5.1 Where required by the AHJ, approved signs or other approved notices shall be provided and maintained to identify fire department access roads or to prohibit the obstruction thereof of both. 18.2.3.5.2 A marked fire apparatus access road shall also be known as a fire lane. 18.2.4* Obstruction and Control of Fire Department Access Road. 18.2.4.1 General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access road shall not be obstructed in any manner, including by the parking of vehicles. 18.2.4.1.2 Minimum required widths and clearances established under 18.2.3.4 shall be maintained at all times. 18.2.4.1.3* Facilities and structures shall be maintained in a manner that does not impair or impede accessibility for fire department operations. 18.2.4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed with gates and barriers in accordance with 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstructed by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of Accessways. 18.2.4.2.1 The AHJ shall be authorized to require the installation and maintenance of gates or other approved barricades across roads, trails, or other accessways not including public streets, alleys, or highways. 18.2.4.2.2 Where required, gates and barricades shall be secured in an approved manner. Rachel Okoji July 20, 2021 Page 6 18.2.4.2.3 Roads, trails, and other access ways that have been closed and obstructed in the manner prescribed by 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owner and the AHJ. 18.2.4.2.4 Public officers acting within their scope of duty shall be permitted to access restricted property identified in 18.2.4.2.1. 18.2.4.2.5 Locks, gates, doors, barricades, chains, enclosures, signs, tags, or seals that have been installed by the fire department or by its order or under its control shall not be removed, unlocked, destroyed, tampered with, or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 18.3 Water Supplies and Fire Hydrants 18.3.1* A water supply approved by the county, capable of supplying the required fire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are hereafter constructed, or moved into or within the county. When any portion of the facility or building is in excess of 150 feet (45 720 mm) from a water supply on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on- site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided when required by the AHJ. For on-site fire hydrant requirements see section 18.3.3. EXCEPTIONS: 1. When facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are completely protected with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system the provisions of section 18.3.1 may be modified by the AHJ. 2. When water supply requirements cannot be installed due to topography or other conditions, the AHJ may require additional fire protection as specified in section 18.3.2 as amended in the code. 3. When there are not more than two dwellings, or two private garage, carports, sheds and agricultural. Occupancies, the requirements of section 18.3.1 may be modified by AHJ. 18.3.2* Where no adequate or reliable water distribution system exists, approved reservoirs, pressure tanks, elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles, or other approved systems capable of providing the required fire flow shall be permitted. 18.3.3* The location, number and type of fire hydrants connected to a water supply capable of delivering the required fire flow shall be provided on a fire apparatus access road on the site of the premises or both, in accordance with the appropriate county water requirements. Rachel Okoji July 20, 2021 Page 7 18.3.4 Fire Hydrants and connections to other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the fire department. 18.3.5 Private water supply systems shall be tested and maintained in accordance with NFPA 25 or county requirements as determined by the AHJ. 18.3.6 Where required by the AHJ, fire hydrants subject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located within a public right of way. 18.3.7 The AHJ shall be notified whenever any fire hydrant is placed out of service or returned to service. Owners of private property required to have hydrants shall maintain hydrant records of approval, testing, and maintenance, in accordance with the respective county water requirements. Records shall be made available for review by the AHJ upon request. C~ 18.3.8 Minimum water supply for buildings that do not meet the minimum County water standards: Buildings up to 2000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 3,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings 2001- 3000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 6,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, 3001- 6000 square feet, shall have a minimum of 12,000 gallons of water available for Firefighting. Buildings, greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the minimum County water and fire flow requirements. Multiple story buildings shall multiply the square feet by the amount of stories when determining the minimum water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a minimum fire flow of 2000gpm per the Department of Water standards shall double the minimum water supply reserved for firefighting. Fire Department Connections (FDC) to alternative water supplies shall comply with 18.3.8 (1)- (6) of this code. NOTE: In that water catchment systems are being used as a means of water supply for firefighting, such systems shall meet the following requirements: Rachel Okoji July 20, 2021 Page 8 1) In that a single water tank is used for both domestic and firefighting water, the water for domestic use shall not be capable of being drawn from the water reserved for firefighting; 2) Minimum pipe diameter sizes from the water supply to the Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall be as follows: a) 4” for C900 PVC pipe; b) 4” for C906 PE pipe; c) 3” for ductile Iron; d) 3’ for galvanized steel. 3) The Fire Department Connection (FDC) shall: a) be made of galvanized steel; b) have a gated valve with 2-1/2 inch, National Standard Thread male fitting and cap; c) be located between 8 ft and 16 ft from the Fire department access. The location shall be approved by the AHJ; d) not be located less than 24 inches, and no higher than 36 inches from finish grade, as measured from the center of the FDC orifice; e) be secure and capable of withstanding drafting operations. Engineered stamped plans may be required; f) not be located more than 150 feet of the most remote part, but not less than 20 feet, of the structure being protected; g) also comply with section 13.1.3 and 18.2.3.4.6.1 of this code. 4) Commercial buildings requiring a fire flow of 2000gpm shall be provided with a second FDC. Each FDC shall be independent of each other, with each FDC being capable of flowing 500gpm by engineered design standards. The second FDC shall be located in an area approved by the AHJ with the idea of multiple Fire apparatus’conducting drafting operations at once, in mind. 5) Inspection and maintenance shall be in accordance to NFPA 25. 6) The owner or lessee of the property shall be responsible for maintaining the water level, quality, and appurtenances of the system. EXCEPTIONS TO SECTION 18.3.8: 1) Agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and shade houses with no combustible or equipment storage. 2) Buildings less than 800 square feet in size that meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements. Rachel Okoji July 20, 2021 Page 9 3) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, storage sheds, and detached garages 800 to 2000 square feet in size, and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 1000 feet. 4) For one and two family dwellings, agricultural buildings, and storage sheds greater than 2000square feet, but less than 3000 square feet and meets the minimum Fire Department Access Road requirements, the distance to the Fire Department Connection may be increased to 500 feet. 5) For buildings with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the minimum water supply required may be modified. If there are any questions regarding these requirements, please contact the Fire Prevention Bureau at (808) 932-2911. KAZUO S.K.L. TODD Fire Chief KV:ds Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 County of Hawaii Hawaii Fire Department 25 Aupuni Street Suite 2501 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Fire Chief Todd, Thank you for your review and comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. In response to the comments received. ERA provides the following responses: 1. NFPA 1, Uniform Fire Code, 2006 Edition with County of Hawaii amendments, Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply will be complied with in the design of the project. Building plans will be submitted for review, comment, and approval. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President SIZANNE D. CASE CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y. IGE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCFS QOVERNOR OF HAWAll COMMISSION ON WATER RFSOURCE MANAGFMENT ynd and STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LANI) DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 August 19, 2019 Environmental Risk Analysis LLC via email: rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii .com Attn: Ms. Rachel Okoji, President 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 Dear Ms. Okoji Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani SUBJECT: Housing Development Project located at South Hilo Island of Hawaii TMK: (3) 2-4- -025:048, 053, & 080 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments At this time, enclosed are comments from the (a) Engineering Division and (b)Land Division- -Hawaii District on the subject matter Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene k.nakamura gov Thank you Sincerely, Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures Central Files CC SUZANNK D. CASE CIIA RECEIVED DAVID V, IGE LANDAND) NATUMAI OVFE OF MAWAR COMMISSION ON MATER LAND DIVISION MANAGEN&NT 2019 JUL 37 AM I@: 4 9 STATE OF HIAWAII DF OF LANnAND NATURAL. RESOURCES NATUR SOU7CE LAND DIVISION STATE QF HAWAI! POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 July 23, 2019 MEMORANDUM DLNR Agencies O Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation XEngineering Division XDiv. of Forestry & Wildlife Div, of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands Hawaii District X Land Division X Historic Preservation Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator FROM Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing UBJECT Development Project South Hilo Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4- -025:048, 053, & 080 LOCATION Environmental Risk Analysis LLC APPLICANT Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. Please submit comments by August 14, 2019 If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587- -0417 or by email at darlene.k nakamura @ hawaii.qov. Thank you () We have no objections () We have no comments Comments are attached Signed Chief Engineer Print Name Date: Attachments Central Files CC DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RE SOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell V. Tsuji Ref: Environmental Asisessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development Project TMK(s): (3) 2-4-025: :048. 053, & 080 Soath Hilo, Island of Hawaii Location Applicant: Environmental Risk Analysis LLC COMMENTS The rulcs and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), Title 44 of the Code of Fedcral Regulations (44CFR), are in effect when development falls within a Special Flood Hazard Arca (high risk areas). State projects are required to comply with 44CFR regulations as stipulated in Section 60.12. Be advised that 44CFR reflects the minimum standards as set forth by the NFIP. Local community flood ordinances may stipulate higher standards that can be more restrictive and would take precedence over the minimum NFIP standards The owner of the project property and/or their representative is responsible to research the Flood Hazard Zone designation for the project. Flood Hazard Zones are designated on FEMA 's Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM), which can be viewed on our Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (FHAT) (http://gis hawaiinfip.org/FlIAT). If there are questions regarding the local flood ordinances, please contact the applicable County NFIP coordinating agency below: Oahy: City and County of Honolulu, Department of Planning and Permitting (808)768-8098 Hawaii Island: County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works (808) 961-8327 Maui/ Molokai/Lanai County of Maui, Department of Planning (808) 270-7253 Kauai; County of Kauai, Department of Public Works (808) 241-4846 Signed CARTY/S. CHAN 3, CHIEF ENGINEER Date SUZANNE D. CASE OA RSON BOARD UF LAND AND NATURAL URCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE DAVID Y, IGE ALANAGEMENT GOVERNOR OF HAIAII STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 July 23, 2019 MEMORANDUM DLNR Agencies TO Div. of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation ) XEngineering Division N XDiv. of Forostry & Wildlife Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Divislon - - Hawaii District X Historic Preservation Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator FROM Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolanil Housing SUBJECT Development Project South Hilo Island of Hawail; TMK: (3) 2-4- -025:048, 053, & 080 LOCATION Environmental Risk Analysis LLC APPLICANT Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter. Please submit comments by August 14, 2019. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. If you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587- -0417 or by email at darlene.k nakamura@ hawaii.gqov. Thank you We have no objections We have no comments () Comments are attached Signed: Print Name Date Attachments Central Files CC SUZANNE D. CASE OF CMAIRPERSON 95 BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RFSOUACES DAVID Y. IGE COMMISSTON ON WATER RESOURCE GOVERNOR OF HAWAI MANACEMENT STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOL'ULU, HAWAII 96809 August 6, 2021 Environmental Risk Analysis LLC via email: rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii .com Attn: Ms. Rachel Okoji, President 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 Dear Ms. Okoji SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development located at Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4- 025: 048, 053, and 080 on behalf of A0705 Hilo, L.P The Land Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments At this time, enclosed are comments from the (a) Engineering Division and (b)Land Division-Hawaii District on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email: darlene k.nakamura @hawaii.gov Thank you Sincerely Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures Central Files CC SUZANNE D. CASE OF CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y. IGE BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RCES GOVERNOR COMMISSION ON WATE.R RESOLRCE MANAGEMENT STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 August 10, 2021 Environmental Risk Analysis LLC via email: rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii .com Attn: Ms. Rachel Okoji, President 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 Dear Ms. Okoji SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development located at Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4- 025: 048, 053, and 080 on behalf of A0705 Hilo, L.P. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. In addition to our previous comments dated August 6, 2021, enclosed are comments from the Division of Forestry & Wildlife on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to darlene.k nakamura contact Darlene Nakamura at (808) 587-0417 or email Thank you Sincerely Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures Central Files CC SUZANNE D. CASE 195g CHAIRPERSON DAVID Y. IGE DOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RFSOURCEN GOVERNOR OF HAWAII COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT nd and g STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 July 16, 2021 MEMORANDUM TO DLNR Agencies Div, of Aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation XEngineering Division ( DLNRENGR@hawaii.goy XDiv. of Forestry & Wildlife (rubyrosa.tterrago@hawaii.gov) Div. of State Parks XCommission on Water Resource Management (DLNR.CWRM@hawaii.go Office of Conservation & Coastal Lands X Land Division Hawaii District (s gordon.c. heity @hawaii.gov) Russell Tsuji FROM Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator SUBJECT Draft Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kaiaulu - O Kapiolani Housing Development LOCATION Hilo, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 2-4-025: 048, 053, and 080 APPLICANT Environmental Risk Analysis on behalf of A0705 Hilo, L.P Transmitted for your review and comment is information on the above-referenced subject matter The DEA was published on July 8, 2021 in the Office of Environmental Quality Control's periodic bulletin, The Environmental Notice, at the following link http://oeqc2.doh.hawaii.gov/The Environmental Notice/2021-07-08-TEN.pdf Please submit any comments by August 6, 2021. If no response is received by this date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions, please contact Darlene Nakamura via email at darlene. k. nakamura hawaii.gov, Thank you ( ) We have no objections ( ) We have no comments ) We have no additional comments. Comments are attached Signed DAVID G. SMITH, Adrhinistrator Print Name Division of Forestry and Wildlife Division Aug 9, 2021 Date Attachments Central Files CC SUZANNE D., CASE AFRPERSON DAVID Y. IGE BOARD OF LAND AND NA FURAL RESOURCES 195 g CNN WATER RESOURCE MANAKEMENT GOVERNOR Cg ROBERT K MASUDA FIRST DIPUTY M. KALEO MANUEL, DEPUTY DI&CTOR WATER AQUATIC BOATING AND RBCREATON BURLAU OF EYANCES COMMS ON WA TFR MANACPEMENT STATE OF HAWAII CTNSDRVATION ANDCOASTAI LANDS HAWAI CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ENFOACEMENVT DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGNEFKFNG FORESTRY AND WILDUFE DIVISION OF FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE HISTORK ATION BLAND RESERVE COMMISSITON 1151 PUNCHBOWL STREET, ROOM 325 LAND STATTPARKS HONOLULU, HAWAJI 96813 August 9, 2021 Log no. 3257 MEMORANDUM TO RUSSELL Y. TSUJT, Administrator Land Division FROM DAVID G. SMITH, Administrator Division of Forestry and Wildlife SUBJECT: Division of Forestry and Wildlife Comments for the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the Proposed Kaiaulu O Kapi'olani Housing Development The Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) has received your inquiry regarding the DEA for the Kaiaulu O Kapi'olani housing development in Hilo on the Island of Hawai'i, TMKs: (3) 2-4-25:048, 053 and 080. The proposed project consists of constructing a total of 64 affordable housing units, a community center for resident use and at least 80 parking stalls The State listed Hawaiian Hawk or *Io (Buteo solitarius) is known to occur in the project vicinity DOFAW recommends surveying the area to ensure no Hawaiian Hawk nests are present if trees are to be cut. might be present during the breeding season from March to September. The State listed Hawaiian Hoary Bat or pe"ape' 'a (Lasiurus cinereus semotus) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees If any site clearing is required this should be timed to avoid disturbance during the bat birthing and pup reanng season (June 1 through September 15). If this cannot be avoided, woody plants greater than 15 feet (4.6 meters) tall should not be disturbed, removed, or trimmed without consulting DOFAW We note that artificial lighting can adversely impact seabirds that may pass through the area at night by causing disorientation. This disorientation can result in collision with manmade artifacts or grounding of birds. For nighttime lighting that might be required, DOFAW recommends that all lights be fully shielded to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15 This is the period when young seabirds take their maiden voyage to the open sea. For illustrations and guidance related to seabird- -friendly light styles that also protect the dark, starry skies of Hawaii please visit: https://dInr, hawaii.gov/wildlife/files/2016/03/DOC439.pdf, DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites, such as in fill. Soil and plant material may contain invasive fungal pathogens (e.g- Rapid *Ohi'a Death) vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants), or invasive plant parts that could harm our We recommend consulting the Big Island Invasive Species native species and ecosystems Committee at (808) 933- -3340 in planning, design, and construction of the project to learn of any high-risk invasive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive Gear that may contain soil, such as work boots and vehicles, should be thoroughly cleaned species with water and sprayed with 70% alcohol solution to prevent the spread of Rapid *Ohi'a Death and other harmful fungal pathogens To prevent the spread of Rapid *Dhi'a Death (ROD), if *Ohi'a trees are present and will be removed, trimmed, or potentially injured DOFAW requests that the information and guidance at the following website be reviewed and followed: https://cms ctahr.hawaii .edu/rod DOFAW recommends using native plant species for landscaping that are appropriate for the area (i.e. climate conditions are suitable for the plants to thrive, historically occurred there, etc.). Please DOFAW recommends consulting the Hawai' 'i-Pacific Weed Risk do not plant invasive species Assessment website to determine the potential invasiveness of plants proposed for use in the project (https com/site/weedriskassessment/home) We appreciate your efforts to work with our office for the conservation of our native species Should the scope of the project change significantly, or should it become apparent that threatened or endangered species may be impacted, please contact our staff as soon as possible If you have any questions, please contact Paul Radley, Protected Species Habitat Conservation Planning Associate at (808) 587-0010 or paul.m, radley@hawaii.gov Sincerely, DAVID G. SMITH Administrator Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 State of Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Land Division PO Box 621 Honolulu, Hawaii 96809 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Land Administrator Tsuji, Thank you for your review and comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. In response to the comments received. ERA provides the following responses: Engineering Division • Flood Hazard Zone has been determined as Flood Zone X. The project will be in compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program. Land Division-Hawaii District • Response of No Comments is noted. Division of Forestry & Wildlife • Mitigative measures for the protection of the Hawaiian Hawk, Hawaiian Hoary Bat, and seabirds have been incorporated into the document. Additionally, measures to minimize the spread of fungal pathogens, vertebrate and invertebrate pests, or invasive plant parts have been included into the document. The use of native plant species for landscaping has been noted. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President SHERRILL A. ERICKSON Attorney at Law P.O. Box 307 Hakalau, Hawaii 96720 beckleylanelaw@gmail.com (808) 960-0921 (cell) _____________________________________________________________________ August 5, 2021 STATE OF HAWAII VIA EMAIL Hawaii Housing Finance and Development Corporation Attn: Janice Takahashi 677 Queen Street, Ste. 300 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 janice.n.takahshi@hawaii.gov A0705 Hilo, L.P. Attn: Grant Bigley 2000 E. Fourth Street, Ste. 220 25 Aupuni Street, Suite 2501 Santa Ana, California 92705 gbigley@uhclic.net Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Attn: Rachel Okoji 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96821 rachelokoji@enviororiskhawaii.com Re: Comments to Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development-Draft EA (AFNSI) Ladies and Gentlemen: This office represents Mr. Peter Vana Trustee ("Mr. Vana"). Mr. Vana owns property designated TMK No. (3) 2-4-25: 132 that borders the land that will comprise the contemplated 64 Unit Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Multifamily Housing Development bearing TMK Nos. (3) 2-4-25:48, 53, 80 (the "Project"). Mr. Vana's adjacent land is improved with three tenant occupied residential buildings. This letter constitutes Mr. Vana' comments as Trustee, individually and as principal of Kavana Homes, Inc., to the above referenced Draft EA. 1. The Project May Have Significant Flooding Problems: Concerns Re Parking Stalls in Drainage Ditch Figure 8: Site Location Map from Nelson et al. shows a Drainage Ditch right down the center of the Project. Similarly, a previous Site Plan by the same Owner for the subject land, "Boschetti Apartment Site Plan", depicts a Drainage Easement, bisecting the 2 site. The Boschetti Apartment Site Plan proposed bridges spanning both ends of the Drainage Easement. The lands that comprise the Project have been described as "Drainageway Lands"1 and have been said to be the subject of "periodic flooding".2The same 2006 Report shows pictures of vegetation near the "drainage channel in the subject parcel" as well as a trio of massive three foot culverts at the "center of the Project Area" looking Southwest3. In light of the above, it is reasonable to conclude that the Project is sited in low lying "drainage" or swamp lands that include a Drainage Easement, and that the site receives substantial volumes of runoff water and indeed "floods periodically". With respect to East Hawaii's propensity to be hammered by torrential rain, the Draft EA states at 4.1.3 that the Hawaiian Islands are regularly affected by Hurricanes, including Hiki (1950), Nina (1957), Dot (1959), Iwa (1982), Iniki (1992) and Iselle (2014). The Draft EA further acknowledges that "global climate change" could mean that Hawaii will have more Hurricanes in the future. Conspicuously absent from the Draft EA is any mention of the affects of record shattering Hurricane Lane of 2018, where upslope Hilo rain gauges recorded a deluge of 52 inches of rain in a couple of days. Hurricane Lane was recognized by FEMA as a "major disaster", with damage to County infrastructure at about 20 million dollars as well as flood damage to at least 150 homes and 30 businesses4 Hurricane Lane caused "the wettest four day period ever observed at Hilo with records going back to 1949".5 Who can forget seeing Hilo streets turn into rivers and the entire Hilo Bayfront area become a vast lake? Events like Hurricane Lane will become more common, as the Project's Draft EA points out. Hilo is the rainiest city in the United States with well over ten feet of rain annually. It is evitable-that the low lying Drainageway Lands comprising the Project will continue to experience periodic flooding as mentioned in the 2006 Report. Flooding and run off are an important environmental concern. Landslides, debris, and erosion can undermine or wash out paved roads, as well as structural members. Flooding can result in personal injury and damages in addition to environmental damage. In light of the above, Mr. Vana disagrees with 5.1.3 of the Draft EA that states that the "risk of flooding" is minimal at the Project and that there should be no significant Environmental concern as to this issue. Mr. Vana instead wonders whether the parking stalls, ADA stalls, and the proposed slab on grade structures themselves sited directly in the Drainage Easement at the center of the Project might end up underwater, especially 1 Nelson, J., M. Clark and R. Rechtman. 2006Archaeological Inventory . . . . for Drainage Way Lands Project (TMKS (3) 3-2-4-25:48, . . . 53, 80 por . . . . . ("2006 Report"). 2 Id. at 4. 3 Figure 15 at 25. 4 Claimsjournal.com 5 National Weather Service 3 after grading within the drainage easement . The above described significant Environmental issues should be addressed fully in the Draft EA.6 2. The Number of Parking Stalls are Insufficient for the Number of People Who will be Living at the Project: Lack of Adequate Parking will Significantly Affect the Surrounding Community The Draft EA at 2.2 states that the proposed Project would include 64 Units, consisting of 32 two-bedroom units, and 24 three bedroom units, and 8 four bedroom Units, and a Community Center. The Draft EA calls for and at least 80 parking stalls. The County mandates just 1.25 parking stalls per unit (64 x 1.25 = 80). While the composition of the prospective renters, families, partners, roommates and friends who may occupy the proposed multi bedroom units at the Project is unknown, it is likely that each of the 64 two, three and four bedroom units will on average need at least two parking stalls. Residents at the Project will also have guests with vehicles. Thus the calculation should be 64 x 2 and the Project should require no fewer than 128 parking stalls. It is important that sufficient parking be provided at the Project, because failure to do so will inevitably result in tenants and guests of the Project parking around the neighborhood wherever they can find parking, as close to the Project as they can find it. Many more cars circling the area looking for parking, equals not merely an increase in inconvenience, but an increase in traffic congestion, green house gas emissions, frustration, and possibly an increase in accidents, trespass, and unlawful parking. 3. The Fact That the Project is so Low that the Sewage Wastewater must be Pumped Uphill Creates a Significant Environmental Impact with Significant Ramifications if the Electricity Goes Out As mentioned above, the Project is sited in a low lying area of Drainageway Lands. It is axiomatic that water, including waste water and sewage do not flow uphill. Most waste water systems do not require electricity to pump wastewater uphill; rather such waste water systems flow down via gravity. Not so with the contemplated Project located in low lying Drainageway Lands. The Project is low relative to the sewer line that is buried on Kukuau Street which will necessitate additional infrastructure to provide electricity to pump the Project's sewage from hundreds of people (12,544 6 Chapter 343 finds and requires: "that the quality of humanity's environment is critical to humanity's well being, that humanity's activities have broad and profound effects upon the interrelations of all components of the environment, and that an environmental review process will integrate the review of environmental concerns with existing planning processes of the State and counties and alert decision makes to significant environmental effects which may result from the implementation of certain actions. The legislature further finds that the process of reviewing environmental effects is desirable because environmental consciousness is enhanced, cooperation and coordination are encouraged, and public participation during the review process benefits all parties involved and society as a whole." HRS 343-1. 4 gallons per day per 5.1.6 of the Draft EA) uphill7 This is a costly and environmentally burdensome plan. The constant pumping of wastewater uphill constitutes a significant environmental impact, especially in the context of global climate change. In the event of a blackout, during a Hurricane or high wind event for an example, or if for any reason the electricity goes out, the pump(s) will not operate and the sewage of hundreds of people (12, 544 gallons each day) will back up. If the power is out for hours or days, and especially if the low lying Project site becomes flooded during torrential rains, the wastewater tank could overflow. Even if the Project developers install a noisy emission producing "back up" diesel generator to pump the sewage uphill in the event of a power outage, the burning of diesel fuel to flush a toilet can reasonably be called a step backwards in terms of environmental protection. The Project does not appear to be "green building Project" and it does not purport to be, even with "energy efficient appliances". Whether or not exacerbation of global climate change will weigh in the approving agency's careful consideration of the environmental impact of the Project, the Project's plan to pump sewage uphill to the tune of 12, 544 gallons per day utilizing electric pumps should be reviewed against concomitant high utility bills, green house gas emissions, and possible environmentally damaging sewage overflows.8 4. Traffic Pattern Circulation Plan Significantly Burdens Kukuau Residents The Project TIAR discussed at 4.2.3 of the Draft EA does not analyze the element of the Project that sets up "right turn in and right turn out" only movements at Kapiolani Street. This traffic circulation plan dumps the extra burden of traffic onto Kukuau Street. Kukuau Street serves a residential "bedroom" area of homes. Kapiolani Street, in front of the Project serves non residential and governmental buildings, including the police station. All the extra traffic on Kukuau, and particularly the heavy equipment, trucks, construction vehicles and workers that follow the proposed circulation pattern during the two plus years of construction, will greatly burden the residential life and homes on Kukuau Street. Kapiolani Street fronting the Project across from the police station with no residences should bear this burden, not Kukuau Street. The Project developers understandably likely desired to economize where they could, but the more just and responsible plan would be to install a center turn lane in front of the police station on Kapiolani Street so that Kapiolani Street with the governmental buildings-and parking lots -not the Kukuau home owners-bear the bulk of the burden of 7 . . . [T]he developer would have to pump sewer up to an elevation . . . into the Kukuau Street collector. Draft EA at 5.2.7. 8 The Supreme Court of Hawaii established precedent in May of 2021of re global climate change requiring the PUC to expressly consider green house gas emissions. In the Matter of the Application of Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. etc. (Hawaii Supreme Court 5/24/2021). See also, HAR Sec. 11-200.1.13 (b)(13) setting forth "greenhouse gases" as a "Significance Criteria" in considering environmental effects. 5 the extra traffic that will be generated by the Project, including the parade of construction vehicles and equipment for however many years construction takes place. Why should homeowners and residents along Kukuau have this burden dumped on them because the Project developer doesn't want to pay for traffic control? The Project developer should install a center turn lane. After all, there is a ten foot wide future road widening strip along the entire Kapiolani Street fronting the Project. This road widening with a center turn land should be done now. This will allow left turns into and out of the Project on Kapiolani Street across from the Police Department. As it stands, with no left turns into or out of the Project on Kapiolani, all the traffic will be routed through the back of the Project onto Kukuau Street and then down to the Kukuau/Kapiolani Street intersection. This Kukuau/Kapiolani intersection already has such poor visibility that traffic mirrors have been installed. If the Project traffic is all routed to Kukuau then this Kukuau/Kapiolani Street intersection will urgently need a traffic light. The Draft EA needs to take into account this important health and safety issue given the statutory mandate of HRS 343 and HAR Sec. 11-200.1.3 to fully consider the "sum of the effects" of this Project cumulatively on the "quality of the environment" and the existing community, whose quality of life will not be enhanced by the aforementioned traffic impacts resulting from the Project, as planned. 5. The Nearest Fire Hydrant May be Insufficient To Suppress Fires at the Project Keith Okamoto, P.E. Department of Water Supply states that the existing 8 inch waterline fronting Kapiolani and the existing 6-inch waterline on Kukuau Street are adequate to provide 1,500 gallons GPM.9 for fire protection with respect to the Project. It is Mr. Vana's understanding however that the current fire suppression requirement is 2,000 GPM for multifamily zones. That is, Hydrants are required by law to have water flow and pressure of 2,000 gallons per minute. As an adjacent property owner with tenant occupied buildings, Mr.Vana requests that the Draft EA address this issue not only as to land and buildings bordering the Project, but as to the adverse impact on the environment when there is inadequate water flow and pressure at the Hydrant(s) and the consequences could be fires burning out of control. It is Mr. Vana's understanding that Fire Department and the Department of Water Supply maintain a close working relationship, and that staff operates hydrants quarterly by opening and flowing the water. Mr. Vana requests that a flow test be done to confirm the specific Hydrant serving the Project (per Mr. Okamoto's letter) provides 2,000 GPM and that the results of such a flow test be expressly stated in the Draft EA at 5.1.6. as being adequate for fire suppression. If such a Hydrant flow test does not result in the required 2,000 GPM capacity, the Draft EA should discuss alternatives/or mitigative measures such as sprinklers in each Unit. It was suggested to Mr. Vana at DWS in the past that joining the six inch Kukuau line with the 8 line where it terminates at the police station on Kapiolani Street (approx. 200 ft) would increase water flow to the hydrants. 9 Letter from DWS to Env. Risk etc. 8/14/2019. 6 Green house gasses from preventable fires should be a consideration in the Draft EA. Fires are likely preventable and properly suppressed with adequate 2,000 GMP Hydrants that should be confirmed by a current flow test. 6. Construction Barrier Blocking Solar Panels and Air Circulation, Trash Location Shown on Site Plan Mr. Vana's final comments may seem de minimus, but a closer look proves otherwise. Mr. Vana is concerned that the high construction barriers that will be erected for the two plus years of construction, between his tenant occupied buildings and the Project will shade out the solar panels he has installed on his buildings and block air circulation. The solar panels Mr. Vana installed are important because they provide energy from the sun to his tenants for water heating. If the Project construction barriers shade out the solar panels, his tenants will have no choice but to increase electricity use from environmentally damaging sources such as largely coal and oil powered HELCO. Accordingly, Mr. Vana requests that the Project Draft EA be amended to state that no construction barriers will be installed adjacent to Mr. Vana's property or that such barriers will be set back sufficiently so that air circulation, and sunlight on Mr. Vana's solar panels will not be affected. Finally Mr. Vana requests that the Project not place its Trash receptacle area directly next to his tenant occupied buildings as shown on the Project site Plan. Such trash receptacles placed literally up to the very property line adjacent to Mr. Vana's tenant windows will result in nuisance, racket, from early morning trash pickup trucks, unsightliness and may unnecessarily increase energy consumption as Mr. Vana's tenants deal with increased pests such as ants, flies and rodents, as well as noxious odors. Thank you for the opportunity to submit comments to the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development Draft EA. Very truly yours, Sherrill A. Erickson Sherrill A. Erickson Attorney at Law cc email County of Hawaii Planning Director, Zendo Kern Sue L.K. Lee Loy Ashley Kierkiewicz Mayor Mitch Roth (regular mail) Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 Mr. Peter Vana, Trustee c/o Mr. Sherrill A Erickson Attorney at Law PO Box 307 Hakalau, Hawaii 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Mr. Sherrill Erickson, Thank you for your review and comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. In response to the comments received. ERA provides the following responses: 1. The Project May Have Significant Flooding Problems: Concerns Re Parking Stalls in Drainage Ditch Drainage on site is being diverted to dry wells installed on the property. The drainage and dry wells are intended to prevent significant flooding and migration off property of site waters. Onsite and Offsite drainage were studied. Reports were provided to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The studies found that proposed culvert conditions would decrease adverse impacts or additional ponding. The installation of drywells would decrease runoff from the site compared to existing conditions. 2. The Number of Parking Stalls are Insufficient for the Number of People Who will be Living at the Project: Lack of Adequate Parking will Significantly Affect the Surrounding Community The parking requirement from Rezoning Ordinance 21-17 is 1.5 stalls per unit (96 stalls). The project has planned 117 stalls for the property. There will be 21 more stalls than the referenced rezoning ordinance (1.82 per unit). In addition, Building code and Fair Housing Act requires 76 stalls be constructed. The proposed number of stalls seeks to address parking availability in the area. 3. The Fact That the Project is so Low that the Sewage Wastewater must be Pumped Uphill Creates a Significant Environmental Impact with Significant Ramifications if the Electricity Goes Out The wastewater system designed for the project will be reviewed by the Wastewater Department for compliance and contingencies will be incorporated into the planning. Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com 4. Traffic Pattern Circulation Plan Significantly Burdens Kukuau Residents Traffic from the development will traverse via Kukuau Street and Kapiolani Street. A traffic study done in 2019 determined traffic in the area mainly serviced local traffic and all intersections (Kukuau St and Kupukupu St, Kapiolani St and Kukuau St, and Kapiolani St and Hualalai St) were observed to operate adequately. 5. The Nearest Fire Hydrant May be Insufficient to Suppress Fires at the Project NFPA 1, Uniform Fire Code, 2006 Edition with County of Hawaii amendments, Chapter 18 Fire Department Access and Water Supply will be complied with in the design of the project. Building plans will be submitted for review, comment, and approval 6. Construction Barrier Blocking Solar Panels and Air Circulation, Trash Location Shown on Site Plan The development will make every effort to be a “good neighbor” while also keeping with environmental regulations. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President From:David Panoff panoff@prodigy.net Subject:Input regarding proposed housing project Kukuau and Kapiolani Date:July 13, 2021 at 12:46 PM To:Rachel Okoji rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii.com,aaron.chung@hawaiicounty.gov Cc:julie-ann.cachola@hawaii.gov,janice.n.takahashi@hawaii.gov,gbigley@uhcllc.net,Nancy Cabral nancyc@daylum.com, Jesse Crawford jesse@lava.net,Nancy Crawford nec0311@hotmail.com,Mitch Roth mitch.roth@hawaiicounty.gov,Lord Lee lee.lord@hawaiicounty.gov Aloha Rachel, Julie, and Grant: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the proposed housing development to be located at the intersection of Kukuau and Kapiolani Streets. It is unfortunate that I only became aware of this proposal so late in this process, and only through mention in a newspaper article instead of more appropriate, community targeted approach. There are two small signs posted at the perimeter of the property in question; however, they are impossible to read unless interested parties park and exit their vehicles, and doing that would require availability of parking, of which there is none, a subject to be discussed later in this communication. Back in 2010, when the County Council first deliberated approval of Bill 184, changing the zoning of the property in question, it was done in anticipation of a Senior Housing project that later, as many of us suspected, turned out to be a canard, just a device to get the zoning changed. But even as both the Planning Commission and County Council mulled this fictional project, several flaws in the design were corrected, specifically relating to parking density ratio and building height, both of which reduced the proposed occupancy of the project and its burden on the infrastructure of the community. None of those well thought out revisions appear to be present in the current proposal. That failure to look to agreements of the past is not surprising as this project is pushed to completion with minimal oversight. I wish to state for the record that I am not categorically opposed to low income housing at this location; I’m quite aware of this community’s need for this relief. Rather, it is the size of the project that makes no sense if one looks at the community infrastructure at that location and the devasting impact that this huge (for this neighborhood) increase in cars, foot traffic, noise, and social amenities (e.g. playgrounds, etc.) will impose. The areas in need of further study are: 1. Pedestrian safety. Despite the misleading statements in the EIS regarding “berms” in the roadway on Kukuau providing safety to pedestrians, just the opposite is the case. I have included photos of the “walkways” leading from the Kukuau entrance to the property to the only path to town or other community destinations (e.g. playgrounds.) The fact that there are no photos of the pedestrian egress in the EIS makes it IMPOSSIBLE for decision makers to correctly evaluate the extreme danger that pedestrians encounter as they walk to and from their homes. There is a 19 foot right of way with a pavement width of 15 to 17 feet. That homes. There is a 19 foot right of way with a pavement width of 15 to 17 feet. That leaves only 24 inches for safe pedestrian travel (in some places much less BECAUSE of the BERM,) including children walking to school, aligned with a roadway that accumulates significant amounts of water, occasionally floods, and upon which cars are often forced to swerve. The drainage on the roadway/walkway is so faulty now that it is virtually impossible for pedestrians to avoid being splashed by passing cars on rainy days. Cars must slow down if pedestrians happen to be on both sides of the roadway. There is NO SIDEWALK for almost a quarter-mile. The pathway is so narrow that pedestrians must walk SINGLE FILE if they are not to be mauled by passing vehicles. PLEASE look at the photos and ignore the misleading text in the EIS. 2. Traffic. The intersection of Kapiolani and Kukuau was already a bottleneck even BEFORE the Kapiolani segment between Mohouli and Kawili was completed. The EIS doesn’t mention this. Each morning the downtown bound traffic is backed up from Ponahawai. A left turn from Kukuau is an exercise in patience and bravery, despite the concave mirror that was mounted that few can use because it is so distant and small in size. Rendering the Kapiolani exit “right turn only” makes matters much worse, since it puts most heavy-duty traffic on Kukuau, interfering with the safe flow of pedestrian foot traffic (as mentioned above) and impeding the flow on Kukuau in the other direction as the narrow turning area makes traffic on one side of the street stop to allow a vehicle to swing out onto the roadway. This is particularly true of delivery trucks that will only want to use the Kukuau entrance and exit because of the Kapiolani restriction. Please, once again, look at the photos of Kukuau and draw the appropriate conclusion. 3. Parking. There is already NO STREET PARKING on either Kukuau or Kapiolani. I have attached a photo of cars parked all the way up Kukuau but the road narrows past Kumukoa and there is no street parking past that point. I know there’s a formula for allocation parking spaces based on number of units, but 80 doesn’t seem to meet those criteria considering were talking about ALL the units being 2, 3 or FOUR Bedroom. 80 parking spots? By my count, according to the proposal, there will be 138 bedrooms. Three and four bedroom units will no doubt include many multi-adult extended families. In Hilo, with no viable public transportation and constant rain, is it reasonable to assume that there will only be 80 resident vehicles? And what about visitors? Where are they going to park? This is a colossal error in planning. There may be a nominal ratio of 1.75 to 1 for average units, but even that would yield 112 parking spots. And that’s truly not nearly enough with 3 and 4 bedroom units in the mix. Really, somebody needs to wake up on this. I believe that before any final decision is made regarding this, a site visit needs to I believe that before any final decision is made regarding this, a site visit needs to be made and the developer needs to rethink the parking. As far as pedestrian safety is concerned, I think the lower Kukuau walkways need to be totally revamped and drainage issues resolved. As far as traffic is concerned, there needs to be a light at Kukuau and Kapiolani and a light at Kapiolani and Hualalai if this has any chance of working. Please feel free to contact me at panoff@prodigy.net if you have any comments or need more input. Photos attached below: Low Income Housin…1).docx Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 David Panoff panoff@prodigy.net Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Mr. Panoff, Thank you for your review on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. Please see below our responses to your concerns. 1.Pedestrian Safety Please note that a traffic study was performed for the proposed project. The study noted: 3.2.2 Pedestrian Accessibility Sidewalks are provided along the following studied roadways in the vicinity of the Project: • Kapiolani Street – Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway. • Kukuau Street – A sidewalk is provided along the eastbound direction of the roadway to the west of Kapiolani Street. • Hualalai Street – Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway to the east of Kapiolani Street. 2.Traffic Please note that a traffic study was performed for the proposed project. The study will be appended to the final document and is attached for your consideration. 3.Parking The parking requirement from Rezoning Ordinance 21-17 is 1.5 stalls per unit (96 stalls). The project has planned 117 stalls for the property. There will be 21 more stalls than the referenced rezoning ordinance (1.82 per unit). Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Mitchell D. Roth Paul K. Ferreira Police Chief Mayor Kenneth Bugado Jr. Deputy Police Chief County of Hawai j POLICE DEPARTMENT 349 Kapi' 'olani Street Hilo, Hawai'i 96720-3998 (808) 935- -3311 * Fax (808) 961 -2389 July 27, 2021 Ms. Rachel Okoji Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, HI 96826 Dear Ms. Okoji SUBJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE KAIAULU OKAPIOLANI HOUSING DEVELOPMENT; TMKs: (3) 2-4- -025:048, :053, :080 HILO, HI Staff, upon reviewing the provided documents, does not anticipate any significant impact to traffic and/or public safety concerns Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment If you have any questions, please contact Captain Sandor Finkey of the Hilo Patrol Division at 961- -2214 or via email at sandor. finkey@hawaiicounty gov Sincerely NT POLICE CHIEF AREA IOPERATIONS SF: Ii/HQ0793 Hawai 'i County is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer' Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com May 15, 2022 County of Hawaii Police Department 349 Kapiolani St Hilo, Hawaii 96720-3998 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Dear Assistant Police Chief O’Connor, Thank you for your review on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development. We acknowledge the Police Department does not anticipate any significant impact from the proposed project to traffic and/or public safety concerns. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President Patricia Tummons 421 Kaanini Street Hilo HI 96720 July 12, 2021 Janice Takahashi HHFDC 677 Queen Street, Suite 300 Honolulu HI 96813 Rachel Okoji Environmental Risk Analysis 905 Makahiki Way Honolulu HI 96821 Grant Bigley A0705 Hilo L.P. 2000 E. Fourth St., Suite 220 Santa Ana CA 92705 Subject: Draft Environmental Assessment, Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development Aloha! I wish to provide comments on this draft EA. For the reasons I outline below, I believe that this document does not meet the requirements of the Hawaii Environmental Policy Act (Chapter 343, Hawaii Revised Statutes) nor those of the federal National Environmental Policy Act. It should accordingly be revised and resubmitted as a draft. No Biological Assessment The prepararers of this DEA did not conduct a review of flora and fauna at the site. Instead, as stated on page 32 (page 48 in the pdf), they relied instead on a survey conducted three years ago, for a completely different project, by a completely different consultant, at a completely different site, 2.5 miles distant, and at a much higher elevation. This study is then used as the basis for an assumption “that the project areas would have similar plant and animal species.” There is utterly no basis for this assumption. There is not even a description of the site at which the 2018 survey was done to justify that assumption. Surface Water According to the DEA, there are no streams or surface water features near the site. However, immediately to the west of the site, there is a drainage ditch that collects water from the Pacific Heights townhouses and other sites upslope. Acquaintances of mine who live along this ditch report that it can flood in heavy rains, overtopping stone walls that line it on the mauka side. Flooding in this ditch would potentially impact the Kukuau entrance to the project and needs to be addressed. This ditch is identified as a drainage easement on tax maps (see Tax Map 2-4-25). That same map shows an easement across TMK parcels 2-4-25:80 and 2-4-25:48. The total area of the easement across both parcels comes to more than 21,000 square feet. The nature of this easement and any restrictions that this may place on the development must be addressed. Parking Hawaii County ordinance 21-17, which enabled the development of this project, specifies that, “Should the property be developed as an affordable rental housing project as represented by the applicant, this additional parking requirement shall be 1.5 parking spaces per multiple family residential unit developed.” However, the DEA specifies that just 1.25 parking stalls will be provided. The actual number of stalls required by ordinance is 96, based on a 64-unit development. Kupukupu Street The DEA refers to traffic studies done at the intersection of Kupukupu Street and Kukuau Street. There is no such intersection. Indeed, Kupukupu Street does not seem to intersect with any street that would lead into the property, running just one block in the public housing project that is south of Hualalai Street. If a different, unnamed street is intended, it should be identified on a map. Historic Sites Appended to the DEA are archaeological reports. There is also a letter forwarding one of them to the State Historic Preservation Division. Any response from SHPD should be included; if there has been no response, that, too, should be stated. Traffic The Traffic Impact Analysis Report conducted by Austin Tsutsumi should be appended to the DEA. As one who lives in the neighborhood, I find it hard to believe that “existing traffic volumes in the study area were generally light.” In rush-hour traffic (generally, anytime within an hour of schools opening to about 8:30 am, and from the time schools close to about 5:30 pm) it is difficult to enter onto Kapiolani Street from Kukuau Street. In addition, traffic has been diverted onto Kapiolani Street in the past when Komohana Street is closed because of accidents or bridges washing out. Also, the consultants are said to have studied the intersection of Kukuau and Kupukupu. Without a map, there is no way of knowing where exactly this is. I am not the only one to wish the inclusion of the TIAR: the state Department of Transportation (letter from Jade Butay, DOT director, to ERA, 8/14/19) asks that the TIAR be included in the DEA. Hawaii County Ordinance 21-17 imposes restrictions on traffic into and out of the proposed development: “Access at Kapiolani Street shall be limited to right-turn in and right-turn out movements only.” This will inevitably mean that the preferred entry will be the one running off Kukuau Street, significantly increasing traffic on this substandard, narrow roadway. Was this considered in the TIAR? Other Transportation Issues On page 51, there is this statement: “The roads surrounding the site are considered ‘complete streets,’ which encourage equitable, accessible, and safe transportation for all modes. … Kukuau Street only has a sidewalk provided along the eastbound direction of the roadway. There is a bicycle lane located on Kukuau Street, and a signed shared roadway on Kapiolani Street.” This is fiction. There is nothing anyone would recognize as a sidewalk on Kukuau below its intersection with Kumukoa. There is no bicycle lane on Kukuau Street. There is no “signed shared roadway” on Kapiolani Street near the project site. Confusing Number of Units On page 53 there is a reference to 75 units in the development. Elsewhere the number of units is said to be 64. Speculation re Sewage On this same page, there is a discussion of wastewater services that suggests there has been no communication with the Hawaii County Department of Environmental Management. The DEA states, “There is no sewer main on the site, but there is a 10-inch sewer main located in Kukuau Street that may be an option for wastewater and sewer, as long as it can meet the demand of an extra 14,280 gallons per day.” This is quite remarkable. If it should turn out that the Kukuau sewer line is not able to handle that substantial additional quantity of wastewater, what do the developers propose instead? Ground-Truthing The description of schools in the vicinity suggests that the source may have been an outdated Google map. The Pacific Academy of Music (not really a school, just a private music teacher) has relocated from Kukuau Street to Nanawale Estates, about a 40-minute drive away. Solid Waste This discussion is entirely inadequate, and wrong to boot. On page 60, there is the statement that the “South Hilo Sanitary landfill will have adequate capacity to accommodate waste generated from the proposed project. … There are three facilities nearby that manage solid waste.” The South Hilo Sanitary Landfill is no longer accepting waste. All municipal waste is now transferred to the west side of the island. Also, the “three facilities nearby that manage solid waste” are not identified. As a resident in the area, I am curious to have these sites pointed out to me. The same error with respect to the Hilo landfill appears again in the appendix which addresses federal affordable housing issues. “Residential wastes are disposed of at South Hilo Sanitary Landfill, operated by Waste Management, located to the west of the site in Hilo.” This is mistaken on several points. Not only are wastes not being accepted at the Hilo landfill, this landfill is not operated by Waste Management, and, finally, it is not west of the site, but rather to the east. Finally, it should be stated whether the landowner or agent of the Kaiaulu project will provide trash service for residents. There is no public trash service in Hilo. Residents must either contract with a private service or haul their own rubbish to a transfer station. Health Care The DEA would have the reader believe that the only health care facilities near the project site are run by Kaiser Permanente. There is no mention of the closer Hilo Medical Center or of the even closer campus of medical services at the corner of Ponahawai and Komohana. This same strange omission is repeated in the discussion of Social Services, where, once more, Kaiser Permanente is the sole care provider mentioned. Drainage An issue that is not substantially addressed by the DEA is that of drainage. As anyone walking past the Kapiolani frontage can see, the project site lies significantly below the elevation of the street. In times of heavy rain, this area effectively becomes a swamp. I mentioned earlier the drainage easement identified on the 2-4-25 tax plat. The map that is included in the cultural assessment more clearly identifies this drainage easement as continuing across the property that is the site of the subject development. (Map appears on page 543 of the pdf file.) In addition, on page 13 (608 in pdf) of the letter from ASM to SHPD, a photo is identified as a view of vegetation near the “drainage channel.” While the site may not appear on the FWS wetland index, the soils are appropriately identified as “muck” (pdf 400). Here is a screen shot: The NRCS defines “hydric” soil as “a soil that formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part.” In other words, “muck” (the first seven inches of the soil layer in this case). The DEA states that an “onsite drainage system will be constructed to accommodate runoff generated by a 50-year storm for one hour.” I question whether this is sufficient. Hilo has recently experienced several 50-year storms, or greater, in recent years. As recently as March 2021, Hilo experienced a rainfall exceeding 3 inches in one hour. The drainage system should, at the very least, accommodate runoff from a 100-year rainfall event. Furthermore, given that more than 20,000 square feet is given over to a drainage easement, any discussion of drainage has to explain how this will be displaced and mitigated by the proposed construction. Padding As a last point, I would register my complaint about the evident padding in this document, which is over 600 pages long. Much of the material included in the appendix could have easily been omitted (for example, the list of residents on Kukuau Street dating back to 1977 from published city directories: why not just include pages from the phone books of that time?) The air quality report (50 pages) is for the entire state, not just the project area. The reports on contaminants runs from pdf page 195 to 454. The Hawaii County drinking water pamphlet and the complete description of the state CZM program are included as well. All this extraneous material, I suggest, is intended to overwhelm the reader and discourage careful consideration of the actual relevant content – or lack thereof, I would say. In conclusion, I believe that at the very least, a revised DEA should be submitted, addressing the serious drainage concerns, solid waste management, and traffic issues. I would also ask that the appendices be edited and the several hundred pages of material that does not directly address the issue at hand be eliminated. Yours truly, Patricia Tummons Patricia Tummons Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way, Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 www.enviroriskhawaii.com August 3, 2022 Patricia Tummons 421 Kaanini Street Hilo HI 96720 Subject: Environmental Assessment for the Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Housing Development TMKs: (3) 2-4-025:048, :053, :080, Hilo, Hawaii Ms. Tummons, Thank you for your comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment document. Please see the below responses: No Biological Assessment Most of the area has been developed for some time. The instances of threatened or endangered species occurring at the site are low. The report includes information from USFWS on threatened and endangered species that may potentially be in the area. The project workers will be educated on identification and will stop work to determine the best course of action for completion. Mitigation measures are also provided in the report. Surface Water Drainage on site is being diverted to dry wells installed on the property. The drainage and dry wells are intended to prevent significant flooding and migration off property of site waters. Onsite and Offsite drainage were studied. Reports were provided to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The studies found that proposed culvert conditions would decrease adverse impacts or additional ponding. The installation of drywells would decrease runoff from the site compared to existing conditions. Parking The parking requirement from rezoning ordinance 21-17 is 1.5 stalls per unit (96 stalls). The project has planned 117 stalls for the property. There will be 21 more stalls than the referenced rezoning ordinance (1.82 per unit). Kupukupu Street Please see attached map. Historic Sites An Archeological Inventory Survey was performed in 2021. State Historic Preservation Office concurred with the Office of Housing and Community Developments determination of No Historic Properties Affected for the project area (please see attached letter). Should iwi or other artifacts be discovered, all work will stop and SHPO will be notified and consulted. Traffic The TIAR will be attached to the document. As there is no access road existing, observations for the right-turn in and right-turn out are not available. Future traffic load is predicted based on the existing roadways. Other Transportation Issues The following is noted on the traffic study: 3.2.2 Pedestrian Accessibility Sidewalks are provided along the following studied roadways in the vicinity of the Project: • Kapiolani Street – Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway. • Kukuau Street – A sidewalk is provided along the eastbound direction of the roadway to the west of Kapiolani Street. • Hualalai Street – Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway to the east of Kapiolani Street. The locations of existing pedestrian facilities are shown in Figure 3.1. 3.2.3 Bicycle Accessibility In the immediate vicinity of the Project, there are currently no bicycle facilities provided along the studied roadway. However, the Bike Plan Hawaii Master Plan, published in 2003 by HDOT, identifies bicycle facilities that are proposed for future implementation. Proposed facilities are assigned a Priority Level ranging from I to III, with Priority Level I planned for near-term completion and Priority Level III planned for long-term completion. An additional Priority Level IV is assigned for bicycle facilities that are contingent on roadway development. In the vicinity of the Project, the following bicycle facilities are identified along studied roadways in the master plan. • Signed Shared Roadway – Kapiolani Street (Priority Level II) • Bicycle Lane – Kukuau Street (Priority Level II) Confusing Number of Units The number of units is to be 64. Speculation re Sewage The wastewater system designed for the project will be reviewed by the Wastewater Department for compliance and contingencies will be incorporated into the planning. Ground-Truthing Discussion regarding schools in the vicinity of the site have been obtained through readily accessible public information sources. The report will be updated to remove the Pacific Academy of Music. Solid Waste Discussion regarding waste disposal was obtained through readily accessible public information sources. The report will be updated to current information. The Kaiaulu O Kapiolani project will provide a trash collection area and service. Health Care Discussion regarding health care facilities was obtained through readily accessible public information sources. The report will be updated to current information. Drainage Drainage on site is being diverted to dry wells installed on the property. The drainage and dry wells are intended to prevent significant flooding and migration off property of site waters. Onsite and Offsite drainage were studied. Reports were provided to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The studies found that proposed culvert conditions would decrease adverse impacts or additional ponding. The installation of drywells would decrease runoff from the site compared to existing conditions. Padding While the material may seem extraneous, it is provided in it’s entirety for transparency. Sincerely, Rachel Okoji, M.S. President PON A H A W AI S T.KINOOLE ST . KUK U A U S T.KAPIOLAN I ST .ULULANI ST .HUALALAI ST.HOLO M A LI A S T.IPUKA S T. HALE N A NI S T.MAUNA KEA ST.POPOLO ST .KAPIOLAN I ST . KI L I K A L N . NO N I L N .IPUK A S T. ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL KUPUKUPU ST. AKAHI S T. COUNTY OF HAWAII OFFICES ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors N NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 3.1 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT FACILITIES NOTES: 1. THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2. PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT FACILITIES SHOWN ON STUDIED ROADWAYS ONLY. PROJECT LOCATION LEGEND EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING MARKED CROSSWALK PROPOSED BICYCLE LANE PROPOSED SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY EXISTING INTRA-HILO WAIAKEA UKA AND KAUMANA BUS ROUTES X KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. DATE OF COUNTS: MAY 14, 2019 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM PM PEAK HOUR: 3:45 PM - 4:45 PM FIGURE 3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS, LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS N NOT TO SCALE 2 LEGEND - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X ##(##)- AM(PM) VEHICLE VOLUMES X(X)-AM(PM) LOS 3 164(123)0(0)A(A)1( 0 ) 0( 0 )(110)152(1)0A( A )4(2 )279(207 )34(89 )A(A )(65)59(5)9(47)116(C)C3(4)7(10)5(1)C(B) (1 )2 (209 )233 (47 )27 (A )A (2)0 (21)2 1 (5)12 (C)C 152(50)252(178 )13(3 )A(A )61(85)0(31)33(88)C(C)(62)84 (246 )204 (3 )2KAPIOLAN I ST .KUKUAU ST.KAPIOLAN I ST .KAPIOLAN I ST .HUALALAI ST.KUKUAU ST.KUKU A U S T. K U P U K U P U S T . HUALA L AI S T. (A )A SUZANNE D. CASE DAVID Y, IGE CHAIRPERSON GOVEKNOR OP DOARDOF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCLS COM RESOURCEMANAC IAWAII ROBERTK MASUD4 FIRST DEPUTY ynd and M KALEO MANUEL DEPLTY DRECTOR - WATER AQUATI RENOXRCES BOATING AND OCEAN RF CREATION BLREAU O CONVEYANCFS ION ON WATER RESOLRCE MANACIEMENT CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS CONSERVATION AND RESORCES ENPORCIMENT STATE OF HAWAII ENGNEERNO FORESTRY AND WIDUFE DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES PRESERVATION KAROOLAWE ISI AND RENERVE COMMSSION LAND STATE PARKS STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION KAKUHIHEWA BUILDING 60] KAMOKILA BLVD, STE SSS KAPOLEL, HI 96707 May 11, 2022 IN REPLY REFER TO Susan Kunz, Housing Administrator Project No.: 2021 PR00880 County of Hawaii Doc. No.: 2205SN01 Office of Housing and Comnunity Development Archaeology 1990 Kinoole Street, Suite 102 Hilo, HI 96720 Email: Susan .Kunz@hawaiicounty gov Dear Ms. Kunz SUBJECT Chapter 6E-42 and National Historic Preseryation Act Section 106 Review Kaiaulu OKapi olani Housing Project Request for Concurrence with Project Effect Determination Archaeoological Inventory Survey Kakdau lst Ahupua'a, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai'i TMK: (3) 2-4-025: :048, 053, and 080 This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SHPD's) review of the Kaidulu. O Kapi'olani Housing Project. SHPD received the initial project submission on July 26, 2021. The submittal consisted of an archacological assessment titled, An Archaeological Assessment for a 0,.6447-acre Property in Kukiau 1' Ahupua'a, South Hilo Districr, Hawai 'i Island, Hawai'i TMK (3)2-4-025: *080 (Escott 2019a, revised March 2022) prepared on behalf of the Urban Housing Communities, LLC., a cultural impact assessment (Escott 2019) for parcel 080 and an archaeological summary letter report (Escott 2019b) that indicated the project area includes parcels 048, 053, and 080 (Submission No. 2021PR00880. 001). The submission indicated the landowner is Mr. Giampaolo Boschetti and that Urban Housing Communities, LLC, is managing the proposed project. On July 26, 2021, SHPD requested additional information, indicating that if federal funds were being used, our office looked forward to receiving a letter fron the appropriate agency initiating NHPA Section 106 consultation with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO). In response, SHPD received a letter dated March 2, 2022, from the Office of Housing and Community Developinent (OHCD) indicating that the project was seeking funding from the U.S. Department of Urban Housing (HUD) and that OHCD is the County agency responsible for compliance with HRS 6E statutes and the Section 106 consultation. OHCD provided a project overview, identification of the HRS 6E and federal area of potential effect (APE), which are synonymous, previous archaeological studies and findings, and requested the SHPO 's concurrence with a finding of no historic properties affected pursuant to 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1) for the proposed undertaking, The SHPD received this letter on March 4, 2022, along with a letter dated February 9, 2022, from the archacological consultant (Glenn Escott) to the OHCD, summanizing the archacological studies undertaken and the Scction 106 consultation effort (Submission No. 2021PR00880. .003), OHCD indicates that the proposed project is the development of an affordable rental complex of 64-units, community center and 117-stall parking lot. The project consists of the construction of nine (9) residential units and will include grubbing, grading, and trenching for utility infrastructure. The project area and area of potential effect (APE) and project area includes the entirety of TMK: (3) 2-4- -025:048, 053, and 080. Ground disturbance consists of grubbing, grading, and trenching within the entire 5.0499-acre project area. Acrial photographs show the project area is mostly undeveloped land, Susan Kunz 05/11/2022 Page 2 SHPD records confirm that portions of the current project area/APE were included in an archaeological survey (AIS Nelson et a1. 2006) conducted by Rechtman Consulting, LLC for a previous waterline project. Nelson et al. (2006) identified a single historic property, a historic enclosure (Site 50-10-35- -25547) within TMK: (3) 2-4 -025:048. They indicated it was significant under HAR $13-284 -6 Criterion d, as having yielded information about historic animal husbandry features, that it was adequately documented during the AlS and, thus, they recommended no further archaeological work, SHPD concurred with the findings and recommendations and accepted the AlS report on September 28, 2006 (Log No. 2006.3275, Doc. No. 0609JT83) Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted the current AlS for the easement portion of the project area/APE [TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080]. Escott (2019a) indicates the AIS involved a 100% coverage pedestrian survey of the easement and that no historic properties were identified, thus the negative findings are presented in an archacological assessment (AA) report in accordance with HAR $13. -284-5(b)(5)(A) SHPD requested revisions via email [Susan Lebo (SHPD) to Glenn Escott (SCS)] for the AA (Escott 2019a) on March 20, 2022, On April 4, 2022, SHPD received from SCS the revised AA report (Escott, March 2022) and a letter dated March 24, 2022, summarizing the revisions (Submission No. 2021PR00880 007). On the same day SHPD also received a letter dated March 23, 2022, from OHCD requesting SHPD's concurtence with a determination of "'No Historic Properties Affected" pursuant to HAR 813- -284-7(a)(1), along with plans showing the limits of proposed disturbance, a current land use map (Submission No. 2021PR00880. 005), and a HRS 6E Submittal Form (Submission No. 2021PR00880 .006) The OHCD and SCS submissions indicate that no historic properties were identified during current AIS (Escott 2019; revised March 2022) conducted within TMK: (3) 2-4-025:080, and that the single historic property (Site 50- 10-35-25547) was identified previously within TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048. Additionally, Site 50- -10-35-25547 (historic enclosure) and that SHPD concurred that this site had been adequately documented. The OHCD and SCS submissions also indicate that nineteen (19) historic properties eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) were identified with a one-half mile radius of the current project area/APE. However, the project will have no direct or indirect (c.g., visual) impacts of these eligible historic properties. Based on the information provided, the SHPO concurs with the OHCD's determination of no historic properties affected for the proposed undertaking pursuant to 36 CFR 800.5(b). Additionally, SHPD concurs with OHCD's determination of "No historic properties affected pursuant to HAR $13- -275-7(a)(1). The NHPA Section 106 and the HRS 6E historic preservation review processes are concluded. The project initiation process may_proceed The OHCD is the office of record for this project. Please maintain a copy of this letter with your environmental review record for this undertaking. The revised AA report meets the minimum requirements of HAR $13-276-5. It is accepted. Please send two hard copies of the report, clearly marked FINAL, along with a text-searchable PDF copy of the report and a copy of this review letter to the Kapolei SHPD office, attention SHPD library Please also submit a text-searchable PDF copy of the report to HICRIS Project No. 2022PR00880 using the Project Supplement option, and a PDF copy of the report to SHPD at Lchua,K Soares @hawaii, gov Please note: In the unlikely event that subsurface historic resources, including human skeletal remains, structural remains, cultural deposits, artifacts, native sand deposits, or sink holes are identified during the demolition and/or construction work, cease work in the immediate vieinity of the find, protect the find from additional disturbance, and contact the State Historic Preservation Division, at (808) 933- -7651 Please contact Sean Naleimaile, Hawaii Island Archaeologist IV at Sean.P. Naleimaile ahawaii, gov for any matters regarding archaeological resources or this letter. Susan Kunz 05/11/2022 Page 2 Aloha, Alan Downer Alan S. Downer, PhD Administrator, State Historic Preservation Division Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Rachel Okojit, rachelokoji@enviroriskhawaii .com CC. Glenn Escott, ggescott@yahoo.com Exhibit 17: Traffic Impact Analysis Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineers • Surveyors 501 Sumner Street, Suite 521 Honolulu, Hawaii 96817-5031 Telephone: (808) 533-3646 Facsimile: (808) 526-1267 E-mail: atahnl@atahawaii.com Honolulu • Wailuku • Hilo, Hawaii TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS Hilo, Hawaii FINAL DRAFT June 21, 2019 Prepared for: Environmental Risk Analysis LLC 905A Makahiki Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96826 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS Hilo, Hawaii FINAL DRAFT Prepared for Environmental Risk Analysis LLC Prepared by Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc. Civil Engineers • Surveyors Honolulu • Wailuku • Hilo, Hawai‘i June 21, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1 Location ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Description ...................................................................................... 1 2. METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Study Methodology ...................................................................................... 4 2.2 Intersection Analysis ................................................................................... 4 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................................................................ 5-10 3.1 Roadway System ........................................................................................ 5 3.2 Sustainable Transportation ......................................................................... 5 3.2.1 Complete Streets .......................................................................... 5 3.2.2 Pedestrian Accessibility ................................................................ 6 3.2.3 Bicycle Accessibility ...................................................................... 6 3.2.4 Public Transit ................................................................................ 6 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes .............................................................................. 8 3.4 Existing Traffic Conditions Observations and Analysis ............................... 8 3.4.1 Existing Intersection Analysis ....................................................... 8 4. BASE YEAR 2021 ................................................................................................... 11-17 4.1 Defacto Growth Rate ................................................................................... 11 4.2 Traffic Forecasts for Known Developments ................................................. 11 4.2.1 Trip Generation ............................................................................. 12 4.3 Base Year 2021 Analysis ............................................................................ 15 4.3.1 Base Year 2021 Intersection Analysis .......................................... 15 5. FUTURE YEAR SCENARIOS ....................................................................................... 18-22 5.1 Background ................................................................................................. 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont’d Page ii 5.2 Travel Demand Estimations ........................................................................ 18 5.2.1 Trip Generation ............................................................................. 18 5.2.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment .................................................. 18 5.3 Future Year 2021 with Project Analysis ....................................................... 19 5.3.1 Future Year 2021 with Project Intersection Analysis .................... 19 6. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................ 23 6.1 Existing Conditions ...................................................................................... 23 6.2 Base Year 2021 ........................................................................................... 23 6.3 Future Year 2021 with Project ..................................................................... 23 7. REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont’d iii TABLES 3.1 LOS SUMMARY TABLE EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................... 10 4.1 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT TRIP GENERATION ............................. 13 4.2 LOS SUMMARY TABLE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND BASE YEAR 2021 17 5.1 TRIP GENERATION RATES....................................................................... 18 5.2 PROJECT-GENERATED TRIPS ................................................................. 18 5.3 LOS SUMMARY TABLE BASE YEAR 2021 AND FUTURE YEAR 2021 ... 22 FIGURES 1.1 LOCATION MAP ......................................................................................... 2 1.2 SITE PLAN .................................................................................................. 3 3.1 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT FACILITIES ............................... 7 3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS, LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS ..................................................................................................... 9 4.1 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS ............................................................ 14 4.2 BASE YEAR 2021 LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS ............................................................................................................. 16 5.1 PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC ............................................................ 20 5.2 FUTURE YEAR 2021 LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS ..................................................................................................... 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS Cont’d iv APPENDICES A. TRAFFIC COUNT DATA B. LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA C. LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS REPORT KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS Hilo, Hawaii 1. INTRODUCTION This report documents the findings of a traffic study conducted by Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates, Inc. (ATA) to evaluate potential traffic impacts resulting from the proposed Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments development in Hilo, Hawaii (hereinafter referred to as the “Project”). 1.1 Location The Project will be located on approximately 5 acres of land consisting of the three (3) undeveloped parcels identified as TMK: (3) 2-4-025:048, 053 and 080. The site is bordered by Kukuau Street to the north, Kapiolani Street to the east and Hualalai Street to the south and is currently zoned for County RM-1.5 (Multiple-Family Residential District). See Figure 1.1 for the Project location. 1.2 Project Description The Project is proposing a new residential development that will consist of 64 affordable multi- family units with 145 parking stalls. Access to the Project Site will be provided along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street via Kupukupu Street. Completion of the Project is anticipated in 2021. See Figure 1.2 for the Project site plan. PON A H A W AI S T.KINOO LE ST .INIA L N. KUK U A U ST.KAPIOLAN I ST .ULULANI ST .HUALALAI ST.HOLO M A LI A S T. MOH O U LI S T.KINOOLE ST .IPUKA S T. HEM A S T. HALE N A NI S T.MAUNA KEA ST.MAUNA LOA ST.PANAEWA ST. HOKU S T.POPOLO ST .POPOLO ST .KAPIOLAN I ST . KI L I K A L N . NO N I L N .IPUK A S T.AI LUNA ST . ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL KUPUKUPU ST. AKAHI S T. COUNTY OF HAWAII OFFICES KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors STUDY INTERSECTIONS KUKUAU ST. & KUPUKUPU ST.1 KAPIOLANI ST. & KUKUAU ST. 2 KAPIOLANI ST. & HUALALAI ST.3 N NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 1.1 LOCATION MAP 2 NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. 3 LOCATION MAP ISLAND OF KONA N NOT TO SCALE SOUTHKONA UPOLU PT. HAWI HONOKAA LAUPAHOEHOE HILO KUMUKAHI PT KALAPANA HONUAPO KA LAE PT. KEAHOLE PT. KAILUA KAILUA HAWAII NATIONAL PARK PAHALA KEAAU WAIMEA KAWAIHAE PAHOA NORTH KOHALA SOUTH KOHALA NORTH KONA HAMAKUA NORTH HILO SOUTH HILO PUNA KA'U SCALE IN MILES 1510505 PROJECT LOCATIONS 1PROJECT LOCATION KUPUKUPU ST. KAPIOLANI S T R E E T NNOT TO SCALEKAIAULU O KAPIOLANIAPARTMENTS TIARAustinTsutsumi& ASSOCIATES, INC.Engineers & SurveyorsSITE SUMMARYBUILDINGS (8-PLEX) 8TOTAL UNITS 64PARKING REQUIRED: 128PARKING PROVIDED: 145STANDARD STALLS: 135ADA STALLS: 10TOTAL STALLS: 145SITE PLANFIGURE 1.2NOTE:THIS DRAWING IS FORILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY.DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. 4 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Methodology This study will address the following: • Assess existing traffic operating conditions at key intersections during the weekday morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hours of traffic within the study area. • Traffic projections for Base Year 2021 (without the Project) including traffic generated by other known developments in the vicinity of the Project in addition to an ambient growth rate. These other known developments are projects that are currently under construction or known new/future developments that are anticipated to affect traffic demand and operations within the study area. • Trip generation and traffic assignment characteristics for the proposed Project. • Traffic projections for Future Year 2021 (with the Project), which includes Base Year traffic volumes in addition to traffic volumes generated by the Project. • Recommendations for Base Year as well as Future Year roadway improvements or other mitigative measures, as appropriate, to reduce or eliminate the adverse impacts resulting from traffic generated by known developments in the region or the Project. 2.2 Intersection Analysis Level of Service (LOS) is a qualitative measure used to describe the conditions of traffic flow at intersections, with values ranging from free-flow conditions at LOS A to congested conditions at LOS F. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition, dated 2016, includes methods for calculating volume to capacity ratios, delays, and corresponding Levels of Service that were utilized in this study. LOS definitions for signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Appendix B. Analyses for the study intersections were performed using the traffic analysis software Synchro, which is able to prepare reports based on the methodologies described in the HCM. These reports contain control delay results as based on intersection lane geometry, signal timing, and hourly traffic volumes. Based on the vehicular delay at each intersection, a LOS is assigned to each approach and intersection movement as a qualitative measure of performance. These results, as confirmed or refined by field observations, constitute the technical analysis that will form the basis of the recommendations outlined in this report. 5 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Roadway System The following are brief descriptions of the existing roadways in the vicinity of the Project. Kapiolani Street – is generally a north-south, two-way, two-lane, undivided County roadway in the vicinity of the Project. The roadway begins to the north at its T-intersection with Waianuenue Avenue and travels south before terminating at its intersection with Kawili Street and Warrior Avenue at Waiakea High School. Kapiolani Street provides access to residential and commercial areas as well as institutional uses, such as the Hawaii Police Department, Hilo Driver Licensing Station and the University of Hawaii at Hilo. In the vicinity of the Project, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour (mph). Kukuau Street – is generally an east-west, two-way, two-lane, undivided County roadway in the vicinity of the Project. The roadway begins to the east at its intersection with Kilauea Avenue and travels to the west before terminating as a dead end just before Puainako Street. After Puainako Street, Kukuau Street continues a short distance through the existing Hilo Hillside development. Kukuau Street mainly provides access to residential and commercial areas in South Hilo. In the vicinity of the Project, the roadway has a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Hualalai Street – is generally an east-west, two-way, two-lane, undivided County roadway in the vicinity of the Project. The roadway begins to the east at its intersection with Kilauea Avenue and travels to the west before terminating at its intersection with Hale Nani Street, just west of Kapiolani Street. Hualalai Street provides access to St. Joseph School and residential and commercial areas. On-street parking is provided along the roadway east of Kapiloani Street. There is no posted speed limit along the roadway. However, there is a posted reverse turn warning sign with an advisory speed of 10 mph west of Kapiolani Street as Hualalai Street transitions into Hale Nani Street. Kupukupu Street – is general a north-south, two-way, two-lane, undivided Private roadway in the vicinity of the Project. The roadway provides access from Kukuau Street to five (5) existing residential buildings. Kupukupu Street is proposed as one of the accesses to the Project. There is no posted speed limit along the roadway. 3.2 Sustainable Transportation 3.2.1 Complete Streets While transportation planning has traditionally focused on automobile travel, recent “Complete Streets” policies also recognize the numerous benefits of encouraging the use of alternative modes of transportation. “Complete Streets” policies encourage the provision of equitable, accessible and safe transportation for all modes. Hawaii State Senate Bill 718 (2009) required that the Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) and the County transportation departments: “…adopt a complete streets policy that seeks to reasonably accommodate convenient access and mobility for all users of the public highways within their respective jurisdictions…” 6 3.2.2 Pedestrian Accessibility Sidewalks are provided along the following studied roadways in the vicinity of the Project: • Kapiolani Street – Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway. • Kukuau Street – A sidewalk is provided along the eastbound direction of the roadway to the west of Kapiolani Street. • Hualalai Street – Sidewalks are provided along both sides of the roadway to the east of Kapiolani Street. The locations of existing pedestrian facilities are shown in Figure 3.1. 3.2.3 Bicycle Accessibility In the immediate vicinity of the Project, there are currently no bicycle facilities provided along the studied roadway. However, the Bike Plan Hawaii Master Plan, published in 2003 by HDOT, identifies bicycle facilities that are proposed for future implementation. Proposed facilities are assigned a Priority Level ranging from I to III, with Priority Level I planned for near-term completion and Priority Level III planned for long-term completion. An additional Priority Level IV is assigned for bicycle facilities that are contingent on roadway development. In the vicinity of the Project, the following bicycle facilities are identified along studied roadways in the master plan. • Signed Shared Roadway – Kapiolani Street (Priority Level II) • Bicycle Lane – Kukuau Street (Priority Level II) The proposed bicycle facilities in the vicinity of the Project are shown in Figure 3.1. 3.2.4 Public Transit The County of Hawaii Mass Transit Agency (MTA) operates the Hele-On Bus, which serves the most populated areas of the island. Several routes provide service within Hilo and to/from other regions of the island, with service generally along Kilauea Avenue in the vicinity of the Project. The following routes provide service along Kilauea Avenue: • Intra-Hilo Waiakea-Uka • Intra-Hilo Keaukaha • Intra-Hilo Kaumana • Hilo-Volcano-Kau • Hilo-Pahoa-Pohoiki • Hilo-Honokaa • Hilo-Kailua Kona The Intra-Hilo Waiakea-Uka and the Intra-Hilo Kaumana routes also provide service in the immediate Project vicinity along Kapiolani Street and Hualalai Street. The existing Hele-On Bus routes are shown in Figure 3.1. PON A H A W AI S T.KINOOLE ST . KUK U A U S T.KAPIOLAN I ST .ULULANI ST .HUALALAI ST.HOLO M A LI A S T.IPUKA S T. HALE N A NI S T.MAUNA KEA ST.POPOLO ST .KAPIOLAN I ST . KI L I K A L N . NO N I L N .IPUK A S T. ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL KUPUKUPU ST. AKAHI S T. COUNTY OF HAWAII OFFICES ST. JOSEPH SCHOOL KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors N NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 3.1 PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT FACILITIES NOTES: 1. THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2. PEDESTRIAN, BICYCLE AND TRANSIT FACILITIES SHOWN ON STUDIED ROADWAYS ONLY. PROJECT LOCATION LEGEND EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING MARKED CROSSWALK PROPOSED BICYCLE LANE PROPOSED SIGNED SHARED ROADWAY EXISTING INTRA-HILO WAIAKEA UKA AND KAUMANA BUS ROUTES 8 3.3 Existing Traffic Volumes The hourly turning movement data utilized in this report were collected on May 14, 2019. Based on the proximity to the proposed Project site, the following intersections were studied in the existing conditions scenario. [1] Kukuau Street/Kupukupu Street (unsignalized) [2] Kapiolani Street/Kukuau Street (unsignalized) [3] Kapiolani Street/Hualalai Street (unsignalized) Based on the count data, it was determined that the AM peak hour of traffic occurs between 7:00 AM and 8:00 AM and the PM peak hour of traffic occurs between 3:45 PM and 4:45 PM. The turning movement count data is included in Appendix A. 3.4 Existing Traffic Conditions Observations and Analysis The observations and analysis described below are based on prevailing observations during the time at which the data was collected. Hereinafter, observations that are expressed as ongoing and current shall represent the conditions that prevailed at the time at which the data was collected. 3.4.1 Existing Intersection Analysis Traffic volumes in the study area were generally light with the studied roadways primarily serving local traffic. All intersections were observed to operate adequately with no major delays to any movements. The study intersections operate satisfactorily during both peak hours of traffic with all movements operating at LOS C or better. Figure 3.2 illustrates the existing lane configurations, volumes and LOS for the study intersection movements. Table 3.1 summarizes the existing LOS at the study intersections. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C X KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. DATE OF COUNTS: MAY 14, 2019 AM PEAK HOUR: 7:00 AM - 8:00 AM PM PEAK HOUR: 3:45 PM - 4:45 PM FIGURE 3.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS, LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS N NOT TO SCALE 2 LEGEND - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X ##(##)- AM(PM) VEHICLE VOLUMES X(X)-AM(PM) LOS 3 164(123)0(0)A(A)1( 0 ) 0( 0 )(110)152(1)0A( A )4(2 )279(207 )34(89 )A(A )(65)59(5)9(47)116(C)C3(4)7(10)5(1)C(B) (1 )2 (209 )233 (47 )27 (A )A (2)0 (21)2 1 (5)12 (C)C 152(50)252(178 )13(3 )A(A )61(85)0(31)33(88)C(C)(62)84 (246 )204 (3 )2KAPIOLAN I ST .KUKUAU ST.KAPIOLAN I ST .KAPIOLAN I ST .HUALALAI ST.KUKUAU ST.KUKU A U S T. K U P U K U P U S T . HUALA L AI S T. (A )A 11 4. BASE YEAR 2021 The year 2021 was studied to reflect the build-out year of the Project. Inclusion of other approved or proposed developments is discussed in the following sections. 4.1 Defacto Growth Rate The Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) Travel Demand Forecasting Model (TDFM) provides traffic projections across the island of Hawaii up to year 2035. The forecasting model uses population forecasts from the Hawaii County General Plan to distribute households and vehicular trips across predetermined Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) based upon existing TAZ household distributions. Based on projections in the TDFM, annual growth rates of 1.4%, 1.3%, and 1.1% were applied along Kuakini Street, Kukuau Street and Hualalai Street, respectively, to determine Base Year 2021 conditions. Because the TDFM does not take into account actual planned or proposed developments, traffic forecasts for known developments in the South Hilo region were added to projections as described in Section 4.2 below. 4.2 Traffic Forecasts for Known Developments Traffic projections from all known background projects in the vicinity of the Project at the time of this study were added to the existing roadway network to account for additional growth in the study area. Trips from the following known developments were added to the existing traffic data to reflect Base Year 2021 conditions. The completion dates for each of the background developments were based on the best available information at the time this report. Where build- out information was not available, completion dates were estimated based on anticipated approval and construction schedules. 1. Abundant Life Grocery – This project is located at the northwest corner of the Kinoole Street/Mamo Street intersection. The project proposes to construct an approximately 7,500 square-foot supermarket. At the time of data collection, construction appeared ready to commence, and completion of the project is anticipated to occur by 2021. 2. Panda Express – This project is located at the southwest corner of the Kilauea Avenue/Kukuau Street intersection. The project proposes to construct an approximately 1,860 square-foot restaurant with a drive-thru. At the time of data collection, construction appeared ready to commence, and completion of the project is anticipated to occur by 2021. 3. Ponahawai Medical Office Building – This project is located along Ponahawai Street just east of Komohana Street. The project proposes to construct an approximately 7,000 square-foot office building and is anticipated to be completed by 2021. 4. Hawaii Vision Specialists – This project is located at the northwest corner of the Kapiolani Street/Hualalai Street intersection. The project proposes to construct an approximately 16,000 square-foot ophthalmology/optometry office. At the time of data collection, the project was under construction, and completion of the project is anticipated to occur by 2021. 12 5. Lanakila Housing Redevelopment – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Kapiolani Street/Mohouli Street intersection. The project proposes to construct 16 affordable multi-family units, with construction projected to be completed by the end of Fall 2020. An additional 46 units are ultimately planned for the housing redevelopment but funding for the remainder of the project is currently pending. Occupation of the first 16 units is assumed by 2021. 6. Hale Kupuna Housing – This project is located at the northwest corner of the Kinoole Street/Kamana Street intersection. The project proposes to construct 36 affordable multi-family units. Based on the most recent projected completion year of 2020, the project was assumed to be completed and occupied by 2021. 7. Bank of Hawaii – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Kinoole Street/Lanikaula Street intersection. The project proposes to construct an approximately 7,500 square-foot bank and is anticipated to be completed by 2021. 8. Mohouli Senior Housing Phase 3 – This project is located at the northwest corner of the Mohouli Street/Komohana Street intersection. The project proposes to develop 92 affordable senior housing units. Construction is projected to be completed by the end of Fall 2020 and assumed to be fully occupied by 2021. 9. Hawaii Island Veterans Housing – This project is located at the northeast corner of the Kapiolani Street/Kawili Street Intersection. The project proposes to construct 92 affordable multi-family rental units for veterans along with a community center and Veteran Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC). The housing component is expected to be completed first, with earliest build-out assumed to occur by 2021. 10. Hilo Hillside – This project is located along the Puainako Street Extension, east of Puainako Heights. Phase 1 of the development includes 56 single-family homes, the majority of which were constructed and occupied at the time of data collection. Phase 2 proposes to construct an additional 66 single-family homes south of Phase 1. Completion of Phase 2 is anticipated to occur by 2021. 11. Puainako Heights – This project is located along the Puainako Street Extension, east of Wilder Road. The project proposes to construct 49 single family homes under Phase 1A and 1B. The remaining phases of the project do not currently have a timeframe for completion. Preconstruction of Phase 1A and 1B had begun at the time of data collection, and completion is anticipated to occur by 2021 at the earliest. 4.2.1 Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publishes a book based on empirical data compiled from a body of more than 4,250 trip generation studies submitted by public agencies, developers, consulting firms and associations. This publication, titled Trip Generation, 10th Edition, provides trip rates and/or formulae based on graphs that correlate vehicular trips with independent variables. The independent variables can range from Dwelling Units (DU) for single-family detached homes to Gross Floor Area (GFA) for commercial or office development. Trips for the above background projects were manually generated using trip generation rates contained in the Trip Generation, 10th Edition as described above. See Table 4.1 for applied trip generation volumes per project. Note that not all volumes generated by the background projects are anticipated to pass through the study area. Figure 4.1 shows the locations of the background developments. 13 Table 4.1: Background Development Trip Generation Background Development AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Abundant Life Grocery (7,500 SF) 17 12 29 58 55 113 Panda Express (1,860 SF) 3 1 4 15 12 27 Ponahawai Medical Office Building (7,000 SF) 16 5 21 7 19 26 Hawaii Vision Specialists (16,000 SF) 34 10 44 16 41 57 Lanakila Housing Redevelopment (16 DU) 2 7 9 8 4 12 Hale Kupuna Housing (36 DU) 4 15 19 15 9 24 Bank of Hawaii (7,500 SF) 42 30 72 77 77 154 Mohouli Senior Housing Phase 3 (92 DU) 7 12 19 14 11 25 Hawaii Island Veterans Housing (92 DU) 10 35 45 35 20 55 Hilo Hillside Phase 2 (56 DU) 11 34 45 37 22 59 Puainako Heights Phase 1 (49 DU) 10 30 40 33 19 52 Total 156 191 347 315 289 604 Notes: 1. All background development trips are not anticipated to pass through the study area. 2. DU = Dwelling Unit 3. SF = Square Feet 8 5 6 9 11 10 7 4 2 1 3 KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors N NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 4.1 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT LOCATIONPROJECT AREA MOHOULI HEIGHTS SENIOR HOUSING PH3 LANAKILA HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT HALE KUPUNA LOW INCOME HOUSING PUAINAKO HEIGHTS PH1 HAWAII ISLAND VETERANS HOUSING HILO HILLSIDE PH2 BANK OF HAWAII PONAHAWAI MEDICAL CLINIC 8 5 6 9 11 10 7 3 HAWAII VISION SPECIALISTS4 PANDA EXPRESS ABUNDANT LIFE GROCERY1 2 15 4.3 Base Year 2021 Analysis It is anticipated that by Base Year 2021 without the Project, traffic will have increased over existing conditions due to the development in the South Hilo region. Actual growth within the study region may vary based upon the approval process of the various background projects. Despite growth in the region, the majority of study intersections are expected to operate similar to existing conditions. 4.3.1 Base Year 2021 Intersection Analysis The majority of movements at the study intersections are anticipated to continue operating similar to existing conditions by Base Year 2021. Although some of the minor street movements are expected to experience longer delays, all minor street movements are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. All major street movements are anticipated to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours. Figure 4.2 illustrates the Base Year 2021 forecast traffic volumes and LOS for the study intersection movements. Table 4.2 summarizes the Base Year 2021 LOS at the study intersections compared to existing conditions. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C. X KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. FIGURE 4.2 BASE YEAR 2021 LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS N NOT TO SCALE 2 LEGEND - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X ##(##)- AM(PM) VEHICLE VOLUMES X(X)-AM(PM) LOS 3 175(150)0(0)A(A)5( 0 ) 0( 0 )(135)175(5)0A( A )10(5 )305(235 )40(100 )A(A )(80)70(5)10(55)125(C)C5(5)10(10)10(5)C(C)(5)5 (235 )255 (65 )35 (A )A (5)0 (25)25 (5)15 (C)C 160(55)300(210 )15(5 )A(A )65(85)5(35)35(95)C(D)(65)85 (300 )225 (5 )5KAPIOLAN I ST .KUKUAU ST.KAPIOLAN I ST .KAPIOLAN I ST .HUALALAI ST.KUKUAU ST.KUKU A U S T. K U P U K U P U S T . HUALA L AI S T. (A )A 18 5. FUTURE YEAR 2021 5.1 Background The Project proposes a new residential development that will consist of 64 affordable multi- family units with 145 parking stalls located on an approximately 5-acre site. The Project site is bordered by Kukuau Street to the north, Kapiolani Street to the east and Hualalai Street to the south. Access to the Project Site will be provided along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street via Kupukupu Street. Completion of the Project is anticipated in 2021. 5.2 Travel Demand Estimations 5.2.1 Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) publishes a book based on empirical data compiled from a body of more than 4,250 trip generation studies submitted by public agencies, developers, consulting firms, and associations. This publication, titled Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, provides trip rates and/or formulae based on graphs that correlate vehicular trips with independent variables. The independent variables can range from Dwelling Units (DU) for single-family detached homes to Square Feet Gross Floor Area (SF GFA) for commercial or office development. These trip rates/formulae and their associated directional distributions were used to estimate the increase in the number of vehicular trips generated by the proposed Project. See Tables 5.1 and 5.2 for Trip Generation formulae and projections for the Project. 5.2.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment Trips generated by the Project were assigned throughout the study area generally based upon existing travel patterns and the Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) Travel Demand Forecasting Model (TDFM). The traffic generated by the Project was added to the forecast Base Year traffic volumes to constitute the traffic volumes for Future Year conditions with the Project. Table 5.1: Trip Generation Rates Land Use Independent Variable AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trip Rate % Enter Trip Rate % Enter Low-Rise Multifamily Housing (220) DU [a] 23% [b] 63% [a] Ln(T)=0.95Ln(X)-0.51 [b] Ln(T)=0.89Ln(X)-0.02 Table 5.2: Project-Generated Trips Land Use Independent Variable AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter (vph) Exit (vph) Total (vph) Enter (vph) Exit (vph) Total (vph) Low-Rise Multifamily Housing (220) 64 DU 7 25 32 25 15 40 19 5.3 Future Year 2021 with Project Analysis By Future Year 2021, the Project is projected to generate a total of 32(40) net external trips during the AM(PM) peak hours of traffic. The projected growth in traffic is expected along major roadways in the study area. Figure 5.1 illustrates the Future Year 2021 Project-generated trip distribution. 5.3.1 Future Year 2021 with Project Intersection Analysis It is anticipated that by Future Year 2021 with the Project, traffic will increase slightly compared to Base Year 2021 conditions without the Project due to the projected growth along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street. Despite the added traffic, all movements will continue to operate similar to Base Year 2021 conditions at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. Both Project access intersections are anticipated to operate with all movements at LOS B or better during both peak hours. Figure 5.2 illustrates the Future Year 2021 with Project forecast traffic volumes and LOS for the study intersection movements. Table 5.3 summarizes the Future Year 2021 with Project LOS at the study intersections compared to Base Year 2021 without Project. LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C. X KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. FIGURE 5.1 PROJECT-GENERATED TRAFFIC N NOT TO SCALE 2 LEGEND - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X ##(##)- AM(PM) VEHICLE VOLUMES 3 10(0)1(5)5( 3 ) 3( 2 )(0)0(3)10(0 )8(5 )1(3 )(2)3(0)0(2)30(0)0(0)0(0)(0 )0(8)2 (3 )1 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 0(0 )4(13 )0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)(0)0(8 )13 (0 )0KAPIOLAN I ST .KUKUAU ST.KAPIOLAN I ST .KAPIOLAN I ST .HUALALAI ST.KUKUAU ST.KUKU A U S T. K U P U K U P U S T . HUALA L AI S T. 5 4 KAPIOLAN I ST . 8(5) 0(0) 0( 0 ) 0( 0 ) ( 8 ) 2 ( 0 ) 0 5(8) 6(10)1(3 )3(10 ) (2 )3 (8 )2 PROJ E C T D W Y. 2 PROJE C T D W Y. 1 X KAIAULU O KAPIOLANI APARTMENTS TIAR AustinTsutsumi & A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . Engineers & Surveyors NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY. DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION. FIGURE 5.2 FUTURE YEAR 2021 LANE CONFIGURATIONS, TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LOS N NOT TO SCALE 2 LEGEND - UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION X ##(##)- AM(PM) VEHICLE VOLUMES X(X)-AM(PM) LOS 3 175(150)5(5)A(A)1 0 ( 5 ) 5( 5 )(135)175(5)5A ( A )10(5 )310(240 )40(100 )A(A )(80)75(5)10(55)125(C)C5(5)10(10)10(5)C(C)(5)5 (245 )260 (65 )35 (A )A (5)0 (25)25 (5)15 (C)C 160(55)300(220 )15(5 )A(A )65(85)5(35)35(95)C(D)(65)85 (310 )240 (5 )5KAPIOLAN I ST .KUKUAU ST.KAPIOLAN I ST .KAPIOLAN I ST .HUALALAI ST.KUKUAU ST.KUKU A U S T. K U P U K U P U S T . HUALA L AI S T. (A )A 5 4 KAPIOLAN I ST . 10(5) 0(0) A(A) 0( 0 ) 5( 0 ) (1 0 ) 5 ( 5 ) 0 ( A )A 5(10) 10(10) B(B)350(325 )5(10 )A(A ) (325 )355 (10 )5 PROJ E C T D W Y. 2 PROJE C T D W Y. 1 23 6. CONCLUSIONS The Project proposes a new residential development that will consist of 64 affordable multi- family units with 145 parking stalls located on an approximately 5-acre site. The Project site is bordered by Kukuau Street to the north, Kapiolani Street to the east and Hualalai Street to the south. Access to the Project Site will be provided along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street via Kupukupu Street. Completion of the Project is anticipated in 2021. At full buildout, the Project is projected to generate a total of 32(40) net external trips during the AM(PM) peak hours of traffic. 6.1 Existing Conditions Traffic volumes in the study area were generally light with the studied roadways serving local traffic only. All intersections were observed to operate adequately with no major delays to any movements. The study intersections operate satisfactorily during both peak hours of traffic with all movements operating at LOS C or better. 6.2 Base Year 2021 Traffic projections in the study area were based upon known developments in the region along with an ambient growth rate applied to nearby roadways. The majority of movements at the study intersections are anticipated to continue operating similar to existing conditions by Base Year 2021. Although some of the minor street movements are expected to experience longer delays, all minor street movements are anticipated to operate at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. All major street movements are anticipated to continue operating at LOS A during both peak hours. 6.3 Future Year 2021 with Project At full buildout, the Project is projected to generate a total of 32(40) net external trips during the AM(PM) peak hours of traffic. Traffic from the Project is expected to generate growth along major roadways in the study area. It is anticipated that by Future Year 2021 with the Project, traffic will increase slightly compared to Base Year 2021 conditions without the Project due to the projected growth along Kapiolani Street and Kukuau Street. Despite the added traffic, all movements will continue to operate similar to Base Year 2021 conditions at LOS C or better during the AM peak hour of traffic and LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. Both Project access intersections are anticipated to operate with all movements at LOS B or better during both peak hours. 24 7. REFERENCES 1. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 10th Edition, 2017. 2. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition, 2016. Y:\2019\19-524 UHC Kaiaulu Housing\Report\190612 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apts DRAFT TIAR.docx A P P E N D I C E S APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA File Name : Kukuau St-Kupukupu St Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Motorcycles - Cars & Light Goods - Buses - Unit Trucks - Articulated Trucks - Bicycles on Road - Bicycles on Crosswalk - Pedestrians From North KUKUAU ST From East KUPUKUPKU ST From South KUKUAU ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 22 0 0 34 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 34 0 0 52 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 3 0 59 0 0 78 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 60 Total 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 152 0 0 224 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 152 0 0 224 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 12.5 0 0 87.5 0 100 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 28.6 0 0 0.4 0 0 3.1 0 67.9 0 0 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars & Light Goods 0 0 0 0 0 62 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 151 0 0 214 % Cars & Light Goods 0 0 0 0 0 96.9 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 99.3 0 0 95.5 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 % Buses 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.7 0 0 0.4 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 % Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 3.1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kukuau St-Kupukupu St Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 From North KUKUAU ST From East KUPUKUPKU ST From South KUKUAU ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 11 0 0 0 1 1 0 22 0 0 22 34 07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 0 0 0 3 3 0 34 0 0 34 52 07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 15 1 0 0 3 4 0 59 0 0 59 78 07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 37 60 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 0 0 64 1 0 0 7 8 0 152 0 0 152 224 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 12.5 0 0 87.5 0 100 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .696 .000 .000 .696 .250 .000 .000 .583 .500 .000 .644 .000 .000 .644 .718 KUKUAU ST KUKUAU ST KUPUKUPKU ST Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 Peds 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Out0 In0 Total0 Right0 Thru64 Left0 Peds0 OutTotalIn153 64 217 Out0 In0 Total0 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 1 Peds 7 Out TotalIn 0 8 8 Out0 In0 Total0 Left0 Thru152 Right0 Peds0 TotalOutIn64 152 216 Out0 In0 Total0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Motorcycles Cars & Light Goods Buses Single-Unit Trucks Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk Pedestrians Peak Hour Data North Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : KAPIOLANI ST-KUKUAU ST Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Motorcycles - Cars & Light Goods - Buses - Unit Trucks - Articulated Trucks - Bicycles on Road - Bicycles on Crosswalk - Pedestrians KAPIOLANI ST From North KUKUAU ST From East KAPIOLANI ST From South KUKUAU ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 7 45 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 66 3 0 20 1 14 2 164 07:15 AM 3 62 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 67 10 0 43 4 17 0 208 07:30 AM 7 66 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 68 15 2 33 0 15 0 212 07:45 AM 10 60 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 78 6 0 20 4 13 1 204 Total 27 233 2 3 3 7 5 2 4 279 34 2 116 9 59 3 788 Grand Total 27 233 2 3 3 7 5 2 4 279 34 2 116 9 59 3 788 Apprch %10.2 87.9 0.8 1.1 17.6 41.2 29.4 11.8 1.3 87.5 10.7 0.6 62 4.8 31.6 1.6 Total %3.4 29.6 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.5 35.4 4.3 0.3 14.7 1.1 7.5 0.4 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars & Light Goods 26 230 2 0 3 6 5 0 4 278 34 0 116 8 58 0 770 % Cars & Light Goods 96.3 98.7 100 0 100 85.7 100 0 100 99.6 100 0 100 88.9 98.3 0 97.7 Buses 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 % Buses 3.7 0.9 0 0 0 14.3 0 0 0 0.4 0 0 0 0 1.7 0 0.8 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 % Bicycles on Road 0 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11.1 0 0 0.3 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 33.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 33.3 0.3 Pedestrians 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 8 % Pedestrians 0 0 0 66.7 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 66.7 1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : KAPIOLANI ST-KUKUAU ST Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KAPIOLANI ST From North KUKUAU ST From East KAPIOLANI ST From South KUKUAU ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 7 45 0 1 53 0 5 0 0 5 0 66 3 0 69 20 1 14 2 37 164 07:15 AM 3 62 0 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 2 67 10 0 79 43 4 17 0 64 208 07:30 AM 7 66 1 0 74 1 1 2 0 4 1 68 15 2 86 33 0 15 0 48 212 07:45 AM 10 60 1 2 73 2 1 3 2 8 1 78 6 0 85 20 4 13 1 38 204 Total Volume 27 233 2 3 265 3 7 5 2 17 4 279 34 2 319 116 9 59 3 187 788 % App. Total 10.2 87.9 0.8 1.1 17.6 41.2 29.4 11.8 1.3 87.5 10.7 0.6 62 4.8 31.6 1.6 PHF .675 .883 .500 .375 .895 .375 .350 .417 .250 .531 .500 .894 .567 .250 .927 .674 .563 .868 .375 .730 .929 KAPIOLANI ST KUKUAU ST KUKUAU ST KAPIOLANI ST Right 27 Thru 233 Left 2 Peds 3 InOut Total 341 265 606 Out0 In0 Total0 Right3 Thru7 Left5 Peds2 OutTotalIn15 17 32 Out0 In0 Total0 Left 34 Thru 279 Right 4 Peds 2 Out TotalIn 354 319 673 Out0 In0 Total0 Left59 Thru9 Right116 Peds3 TotalOutIn68 187 255 Out0 In0 Total0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Motorcycles Cars & Light Goods Buses Single-Unit Trucks Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk Pedestrians Peak Hour Data North Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kapiolani St-Hualalai St Site Code : 19-524 UHC Hilo Kaiaulu TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Motorcycles - Cars & Light Goods - Buses - Unit Trucks - Articulated Trucks - Bicycles on Road - Bicycles on Crosswalk - Pedestrians KAPIOLANI ST From North HUALALAI ST From East KAPIOLANI ST From South HUALALAI ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 07:00 AM 0 44 15 0 13 0 5 0 21 70 3 0 3 7 0 1 182 07:15 AM 0 48 22 0 13 0 10 0 51 61 5 0 5 4 0 0 219 07:30 AM 1 74 35 0 21 0 11 0 53 76 3 0 4 6 0 0 284 07:45 AM 1 38 12 0 14 0 7 1 27 45 2 0 0 4 0 0 151 Total 2 204 84 0 61 0 33 1 152 252 13 0 12 21 0 1 836 Grand Total 2 204 84 0 61 0 33 1 152 252 13 0 12 21 0 1 836 Apprch %0.7 70.3 29 0 64.2 0 34.7 1.1 36.5 60.4 3.1 0 35.3 61.8 0 2.9 Total %0.2 24.4 10 0 7.3 0 3.9 0.1 18.2 30.1 1.6 0 1.4 2.5 0 0.1 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars & Light Goods 2 203 83 0 60 0 33 0 149 252 12 0 11 21 0 0 826 % Cars & Light Goods 100 99.5 98.8 0 98.4 0 100 0 98 100 92.3 0 91.7 100 0 0 98.8 Buses 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 % Buses 0 0.5 1.2 0 1.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 % Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7.7 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.3 0 0 0 0.1 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 % Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0.2 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kapiolani St-Hualalai St Site Code : 19-524 UHC Hilo Kaiaulu TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KAPIOLANI ST From North HUALALAI ST From East KAPIOLANI ST From South HUALALAI ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 07:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 AM 07:00 AM 0 44 15 0 59 13 0 5 0 18 21 70 3 0 94 3 7 0 1 11 182 07:15 AM 0 48 22 0 70 13 0 10 0 23 51 61 5 0 117 5 4 0 0 9 219 07:30 AM 1 74 35 0 110 21 0 11 0 32 53 76 3 0 132 4 6 0 0 10 284 07:45 AM 1 38 12 0 51 14 0 7 1 22 27 45 2 0 74 0 4 0 0 4 151 Total Volume 2 204 84 0 290 61 0 33 1 95 152 252 13 0 417 12 21 0 1 34 836 % App. Total 0.7 70.3 29 0 64.2 0 34.7 1.1 36.5 60.4 3.1 0 35.3 61.8 0 2.9 PHF .500 .689 .600 .000 .659 .726 .000 .750 .250 .742 .717 .829 .650 .000 .790 .600 .750 .000 .250 .773 .736 KAPIOLANI ST HUALALAI ST HUALALAI ST KAPIOLANI ST Right 2 Thru 204 Left 84 Peds 0 InOut Total 313 290 603 Out0 In0 Total0 Right61 Thru0 Left33 Peds1 OutTotalIn257 95 352 Out0 In0 Total0 Left 13 Thru 252 Right 152 Peds 0 Out TotalIn 249 417 666 Out0 In0 Total0 Left0 Thru21 Right12 Peds1 TotalOutIn15 34 49 Out0 In0 Total0 Peak Hour Begins at 07:00 AM Motorcycles Cars & Light Goods Buses Single-Unit Trucks Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk Pedestrians Peak Hour Data North Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kukuau St-Kupukupu St Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Motorcycles - Cars & Light Goods - Buses - Unit Trucks - Articulated Trucks - Bicycles on Road - Bicycles on Crosswalk - Pedestrians From North KUKUAU ST From East KUPUKUPKU ST From South KUKUAU ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 44 Total 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 44 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 0 0 54 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 31 0 0 60 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 31 0 0 81 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 110 0 0 239 Apprch %0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0.9 99.1 0 0 Total %0 0 0 0 0 51.5 0 0 0 0 0 2.1 0.4 46 0 0 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cars & Light Goods 0 0 0 0 0 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 109 0 0 232 % Cars & Light Goods 0 0 0 0 0 99.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 99.1 0 0 97.1 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.4 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 % Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.9 0 0 0.4 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 % Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 2.1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kukuau St-Kupukupu St Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 From North KUKUAU ST From East KUPUKUPKU ST From South KUKUAU ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:45 PM to 04:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 25 0 0 0 1 1 0 18 0 0 18 44 04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 0 0 23 0 0 0 0 0 1 30 0 0 31 54 04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 0 0 28 0 0 0 1 1 0 31 0 0 31 60 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 0 0 47 0 0 0 3 3 0 31 0 0 31 81 Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 123 0 0 123 0 0 0 5 5 1 110 0 0 111 239 % App. Total 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0.9 99.1 0 0 PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .654 .000 .000 .654 .000 .000 .000 .417 .417 .250 .887 .000 .000 .895 .738 KUKUAU ST KUKUAU ST KUPUKUPKU ST Right 0 Thru 0 Left 0 Peds 0 InOut Total 0 0 0 Out0 In0 Total0 Right0 Thru123 Left0 Peds0 OutTotalIn110 123 233 Out0 In0 Total0 Left 0 Thru 0 Right 0 Peds 5 Out TotalIn 1 5 6 Out0 In0 Total0 Left0 Thru110 Right1 Peds0 TotalOutIn123 111 234 Out0 In0 Total0 Peak Hour Begins at 03:45 PM Motorcycles Cars & Light Goods Buses Single-Unit Trucks Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk Pedestrians Peak Hour Data North Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : KAPIOLANI ST-KUKUAU ST Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Motorcycles - Cars & Light Goods - Buses - Unit Trucks - Articulated Trucks - Bicycles on Road - Bicycles on Crosswalk - Pedestrians KAPIOLANI ST From North KUKUAU ST From East KAPIOLANI ST From South KUKUAU ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 03:45 PM 3 52 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 48 14 1 17 1 13 1 155 Total 3 52 0 0 0 3 0 1 1 48 14 1 17 1 13 1 155 04:00 PM 12 41 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 46 21 0 9 2 18 2 155 04:15 PM 15 50 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 46 27 1 12 0 19 1 176 04:30 PM 17 66 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 67 27 0 9 2 15 0 208 Grand Total 47 209 1 0 4 10 1 1 2 207 89 2 47 5 65 4 694 Apprch %18.3 81.3 0.4 0 25 62.5 6.2 6.2 0.7 69 29.7 0.7 38.8 4.1 53.7 3.3 Total %6.8 30.1 0.1 0 0.6 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.3 29.8 12.8 0.3 6.8 0.7 9.4 0.6 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 Cars & Light Goods 47 208 1 0 4 10 1 0 2 206 89 0 47 4 65 0 684 % Cars & Light Goods 100 99.5 100 0 100 100 100 0 100 99.5 100 0 100 80 100 0 98.6 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles on Road 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 % Bicycles on Road 0 0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0.3 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 7 % Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 100 1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : KAPIOLANI ST-KUKUAU ST Site Code : 19-524 UHC HILO KAIAULU TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KAPIOLANI ST From North KUKUAU ST From East KAPIOLANI ST From South KUKUAU ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:45 PM to 04:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 3 52 0 0 55 0 3 0 1 4 1 48 14 1 64 17 1 13 1 32 155 04:00 PM 12 41 1 0 54 1 2 0 0 3 0 46 21 0 67 9 2 18 2 31 155 04:15 PM 15 50 0 0 65 0 3 1 0 4 1 46 27 1 75 12 0 19 1 32 176 04:30 PM 17 66 0 0 83 3 2 0 0 5 0 67 27 0 94 9 2 15 0 26 208 Total Volume 47 209 1 0 257 4 10 1 1 16 2 207 89 2 300 47 5 65 4 121 694 % App. Total 18.3 81.3 0.4 0 25 62.5 6.2 6.2 0.7 69 29.7 0.7 38.8 4.1 53.7 3.3 PHF .691 .792 .250 .000 .774 .333 .833 .250 .250 .800 .500 .772 .824 .500 .798 .691 .625 .855 .500 .945 .834 KAPIOLANI ST KUKUAU ST KUKUAU ST KAPIOLANI ST Right 47 Thru 209 Left 1 Peds 0 InOut Total 276 257 533 Out0 In0 Total0 Right4 Thru10 Left1 Peds1 OutTotalIn8 16 24 Out0 In0 Total0 Left 89 Thru 207 Right 2 Peds 2 Out TotalIn 257 300 557 Out0 In0 Total0 Left65 Thru5 Right47 Peds4 TotalOutIn146 121 267 Out0 In0 Total0 Peak Hour Begins at 03:45 PM Motorcycles Cars & Light Goods Buses Single-Unit Trucks Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk Pedestrians Peak Hour Data North Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kapiolani St-Hualalai St Site Code : 19-524 UHC Hilo Kaiaulu TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Motorcycles - Cars & Light Goods - Buses - Unit Trucks - Articulated Trucks - Bicycles on Road - Bicycles on Crosswalk - Pedestrians KAPIOLANI ST From North HUALALAI ST From East KAPIOLANI ST From South HUALALAI ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Int. Total 03:45 PM 1 55 13 0 24 12 12 0 15 35 0 0 1 4 1 0 173 Total 1 55 13 0 24 12 12 0 15 35 0 0 1 4 1 0 173 04:00 PM 2 62 14 0 14 5 18 0 13 39 1 0 2 8 0 0 178 04:15 PM 0 42 11 0 19 8 22 1 15 49 1 0 1 7 1 0 177 04:30 PM 0 87 24 0 28 6 36 0 7 55 1 0 1 2 0 0 247 Grand Total 3 246 62 0 85 31 88 1 50 178 3 0 5 21 2 0 775 Apprch %1 79.1 19.9 0 41.5 15.1 42.9 0.5 21.6 77.1 1.3 0 17.9 75 7.1 0 Total %0.4 31.7 8 0 11 4 11.4 0.1 6.5 23 0.4 0 0.6 2.7 0.3 0 Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Motorcycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 Cars & Light Goods 3 246 62 0 84 31 88 0 50 177 3 0 5 21 2 0 772 % Cars & Light Goods 100 100 100 0 98.8 100 100 0 100 99.4 100 0 100 100 100 0 99.6 Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Buses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Single-Unit Trucks 0 0 0 0 1.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Articulated Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 % Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.1 Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 File Name : Kapiolani St-Hualalai St Site Code : 19-524 UHC Hilo Kaiaulu TIAR Start Date : 5/14/2019 Page No : 2 KAPIOLANI ST From North HUALALAI ST From East KAPIOLANI ST From South HUALALAI ST From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Right Thru Left Peds App. Total Int. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 03:45 PM to 04:30 PM - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 03:45 PM 03:45 PM 1 55 13 0 69 24 12 12 0 48 15 35 0 0 50 1 4 1 0 6 173 04:00 PM 2 62 14 0 78 14 5 18 0 37 13 39 1 0 53 2 8 0 0 10 178 04:15 PM 0 42 11 0 53 19 8 22 1 50 15 49 1 0 65 1 7 1 0 9 177 04:30 PM 0 87 24 0 111 28 6 36 0 70 7 55 1 0 63 1 2 0 0 3 247 Total Volume 3 246 62 0 311 85 31 88 1 205 50 178 3 0 231 5 21 2 0 28 775 % App. Total 1 79.1 19.9 0 41.5 15.1 42.9 0.5 21.6 77.1 1.3 0 17.9 75 7.1 0 PHF .375 .707 .646 .000 .700 .759 .646 .611 .250 .732 .833 .809 .750 .000 .888 .625 .656 .500 .000 .700 .784 KAPIOLANI ST HUALALAI ST HUALALAI ST KAPIOLANI ST Right 3 Thru 246 Left 62 Peds 0 InOut Total 265 311 576 Out0 In0 Total0 Right85 Thru31 Left88 Peds1 OutTotalIn133 205 338 Out0 In0 Total0 Left 3 Thru 178 Right 50 Peds 0 Out TotalIn 339 231 570 Out0 In0 Total0 Left2 Thru21 Right5 Peds0 TotalOutIn37 28 65 Out0 In0 Total0 Peak Hour Begins at 03:45 PM Motorcycles Cars & Light Goods Buses Single-Unit Trucks Articulated Trucks Bicycles on Road Bicycles on Crosswalk Pedestrians Peak Hour Data North Austin Tsutsumi & Associates 1871 Wili Pa Loop, Suite A Wailuku, Hawaii 96793 Phone: (808) 244-8044 Fax: (808) 242-9163 APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA APPENDIX B – LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CRITERIA VEHICULAR LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6th Edition) Level of service for vehicles at signalized intersections is directly related to delay values and is assigned on that basis. Level of Service is a measure of the acceptability of delay values to motorists at a given intersection. The criteria are given in the table below. Level-of Service Criteria for Signalized Intersections Control Delay per Level of Service Vehicle (sec./veh.) A < 10.0 B >10.0 and ≤ 20.0 C >20.0 and ≤ 35.0 D >35.0 and ≤ 55.0 E >55.0 and ≤ 80.0 F > 80.0 Delay is a complex measure, and is dependent on a number of variables, including the quality of progression, the cycle length, the green ratio, and the v/c ratio for the lane group or approach in question. VEHICULAR LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA FOR UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (HCM 6th Edition) The level of service criteria for vehicles at unsignalized intersections is defined as the average control delay, in seconds per vehicle. LOS delay threshold values are lower for two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) and all-way stop- controlled (AWSC) intersections than those of signalized intersections. This is because more vehicles pass through signalized intersections, and therefore, drivers expect and tolerate greater delays. While the criteria for level of service for TWSC and AWSC intersections are the same, procedures to calculate the average total delay may differ. Level of Service Criteria for Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay (sec/veh) A ≤ 10 B >10 and ≤15 C >15 and ≤25 D >25 and ≤35 E >35 and ≤50 F > 50 APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS • Existing AM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\Existing\Existing AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 152 0 0 64 0 1 Future Vol, veh/h 152 0 0 64 0 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 77000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 165 0 0 70 0 1 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 172 0 242 172 Stage 1 - - - - 172 - Stage 2 - - - - 70 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1405 - 746 872 Stage 1 - - - - 858 - Stage 2 - - - - 953 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1396 - 741 866 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 741 - Stage 1 - - - - 852 - Stage 2 - - - - 953 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.2 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 866 - - 1396 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 ---- HCM Control Delay (s) 9.2 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\Existing\Existing AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 59 9 116 5 7 3 34 279 4 2 233 27 Future Vol, veh/h 59 9 116 5 7 3 34 279 4 2 233 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 02203302203 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 64 10 126 5 8 3 37 303 4 2 253 29 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 663 658 273 723 670 310 285 0 0 309 0 0 Stage 1 275 275 - 381 381 ------- Stage 2 388 383 - 342 289 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 375 384 766 342 378 730 1277 - - 1252 - - Stage 1 731 683 - 641 613 ------- Stage 2 636 612 - 673 673 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 355 368 762 271 362 727 1273 - - 1250 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 355 368 - 271 362 ------- Stage 1 703 680 - 617 590 ------- Stage 2 601 589 - 551 670 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15.6 15.5 0.8 0.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1273 - - 537 358 1250 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.029 - - 0.372 0.046 0.002 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 15.6 15.5 7.9 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 1.7 0.1 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\Existing\Existing AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 21 12 33 0 61 13 252 152 84 204 2 Future Vol, veh/h 0 21 12 33 0 61 13 252 152 84 204 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000101101 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 23 13 36 0 66 14 274 165 91 222 2 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 824 874 224 809 793 358 225 0 0 440 0 0 Stage 1 406 406 - 386 386 ------- Stage 2 418 468 - 423 407 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 292 288 815 299 321 686 1344 - - 1120 - - Stage 1 622 598 - 637 610 ------- Stage 2 612 561 - 609 597 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 242 257 814 252 287 685 1343 - - 1119 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 242 257 - 252 287 ------- Stage 1 613 542 - 627 601 ------- Stage 2 545 553 - 521 541 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.8 16.1 0.2 2.5 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1343 - - 342 427 1119 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.011 - - 0.105 0.239 0.082 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - 16.8 16.1 8.5 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 0.9 0.3 - - APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS • Existing PM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\Existing\Existing PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 110 1 0 123 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 110 1 0 123 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 55000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 120 1 0 134 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 126 0 260 126 Stage 1 - - - - 126 - Stage 2 - - - - 134 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1460 - 729 924 Stage 1 - - - - 900 - Stage 2 - - - - 892 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1453 - 725 920 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 725 - Stage 1 - - - - 896 - Stage 2 - - - - 892 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1453 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio ----- HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\Existing\Existing PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 65 5 47 1 10 4 89 207 2 1 209 47 Future Vol, veh/h 65 5 47 1 10 4 89 207 2 1 209 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 02200401104 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 71 5 51 1 11 4 97 225 2 1 227 51 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 687 681 259 706 705 227 282 0 0 228 0 0 Stage 1 259 259 - 421 421 ------- Stage 2 428 422 - 285 284 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 361 373 780 351 361 812 1280 - - 1340 - - Stage 1 746 694 - 610 589 ------- Stage 2 605 588 - 722 676 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 325 339 776 301 328 811 1275 - - 1339 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 325 339 - 301 328 ------- Stage 1 679 691 - 556 537 ------- Stage 2 538 536 - 667 673 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17 14.7 2.4 0 HCM LOS C B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1275 - - 425 387 1339 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 - - 0.299 0.042 0.001 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 - 17 14.7 7.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C B A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 - - 1.2 0.1 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\Existing\Existing PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 21 5 88 31 85 3 178 50 62 246 3 Future Vol, veh/h 2 21 5 88 31 85 3 178 50 62 246 3 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000001100 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 2 23 5 96 34 92 3 193 54 67 267 3 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 692 657 269 644 631 221 270 0 0 248 0 0 Stage 1 403 403 - 227 227 ------- Stage 2 289 254 - 417 404 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 358 385 770 386 398 819 1293 - - 1318 - - Stage 1 624 600 - 776 716 ------- Stage 2 719 697 - 613 599 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 282 360 770 347 373 818 1293 - - 1317 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 282 360 - 347 373 ------- Stage 1 622 564 - 773 713 ------- Stage 2 606 694 - 549 563 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 15 19.7 0.1 1.6 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1293 - - 389 463 1317 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - - 0.078 0.479 0.051 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - 15 19.7 7.9 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.3 2.5 0.2 - - APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS • Base Year 2021 AM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\BY 2021\BY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 175 0 0 75 0 5 Future Vol, veh/h 175 0 0 75 0 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 77000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 190 0 0 82 0 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 197 0 279 197 Stage 1 - - - - 197 - Stage 2 - - - - 82 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1376 - 711 844 Stage 1 - - - - 836 - Stage 2 - - - - 941 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1367 - 706 838 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 706 - Stage 1 - - - - 830 - Stage 2 - - - - 941 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 9.3 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 838 - - 1367 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 ---- HCM Control Delay (s) 9.3 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\BY 2021\BY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 70 10 125 10 10 5 40 305 10 5 255 35 Future Vol, veh/h 70 10 125 10 10 5 40 305 10 5 255 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 02203302203 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 76 11 136 11 11 5 43 332 11 5 277 38 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 744 740 301 808 754 343 318 0 0 345 0 0 Stage 1 309 309 - 426 426 ------- Stage 2 435 431 - 382 328 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 331 345 739 299 338 700 1242 - - 1214 - - Stage 1 701 660 - 606 586 ------- Stage 2 600 583 - 640 647 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 307 327 735 228 320 697 1238 - - 1212 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 307 327 - 228 320 ------- Stage 1 669 655 - 579 560 ------- Stage 2 557 557 - 509 642 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.9 18 0.9 0.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1238 - - 478 304 1212 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - 0.466 0.089 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 - 18.9 18 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 2.4 0.3 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\BY 2021\BY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 25 15 35 5 65 15 300 160 85 225 5 Future Vol, veh/h 0 25 15 35 5 65 15 300 160 85 225 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000101101 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 27 16 38 5 71 16 326 174 92 245 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 916 966 249 899 881 414 251 0 0 501 0 0 Stage 1 433 433 - 446 446 ------- Stage 2 483 533 - 453 435 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 253 255 790 260 285 638 1314 - - 1063 - - Stage 1 601 582 - 591 574 ------- Stage 2 565 525 - 586 580 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 201 225 789 211 251 637 1313 - - 1062 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 201 225 - 211 251 ------- Stage 1 590 523 - 580 564 ------- Stage 2 489 516 - 489 521 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.7 19.3 0.2 2.4 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1313 - - 307 365 1062 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - 0.142 0.313 0.087 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - 18.7 19.3 8.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5 1.3 0.3 - - APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS • Base Year 2021 PM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\BY 2021\BY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 135 5 0 150 0 0 Future Vol, veh/h 135 5 0 150 0 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 55000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 147 5 0 163 0 0 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 157 0 318 155 Stage 1 - - - - 155 - Stage 2 - - - - 163 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1423 - 675 891 Stage 1 - - - - 873 - Stage 2 - - - - 866 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1416 - 672 887 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 672 - Stage 1 - - - - 869 - Stage 2 - - - - 866 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) - - - 1416 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio ----- HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 - HCM Lane LOS A - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\BY 2021\BY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 5 55 5 10 5 100 235 5 5 235 65 Future Vol, veh/h 80 5 55 5 10 5 100 235 5 5 235 65 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 02200401104 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 87 5 60 5 11 5 109 255 5 5 255 71 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 789 784 297 812 817 259 330 0 0 261 0 0 Stage 1 305 305 - 477 477 ------- Stage 2 484 479 - 335 340 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 308 325 742 298 311 780 1229 - - 1303 - - Stage 1 705 662 - 569 556 ------- Stage 2 564 555 - 679 639 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 271 288 738 247 276 779 1224 - - 1302 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 271 288 - 247 276 ------- Stage 1 630 656 - 509 498 ------- Stage 2 491 497 - 615 633 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22 17.2 2.4 0.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1224 - - 362 318 1302 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.089 - - 0.42 0.068 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 - 22 17.2 7.8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 2 0.2 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\BY 2021\BY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 7.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 25 5 95 35 85 5 210 55 65 300 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 25 5 95 35 85 5 210 55 65 300 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000001100 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 5 27 5 103 38 92 5 228 60 71 326 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 804 770 329 756 742 259 331 0 0 289 0 0 Stage 1 471 471 - 269 269 ------- Stage 2 333 299 - 487 473 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 301 331 712 325 344 780 1228 - - 1273 - - Stage 1 573 560 - 737 687 ------- Stage 2 681 666 - 562 558 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 228 307 712 284 319 779 1228 - - 1272 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 228 307 - 284 319 ------- Stage 1 570 522 - 733 683 ------- Stage 2 564 662 - 493 520 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 17.9 27.2 0.1 1.4 HCM LOS C D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1228 - - 317 389 1272 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.12 0.601 0.056 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 17.9 27.2 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C D A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 3.8 0.2 - - APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS • Future Year 2021 AM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 175 5 5 75 5 10 Future Vol, veh/h 175 5 5 75 5 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 77000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 190 5 5 82 5 11 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 202 0 292 200 Stage 1 - - - - 200 - Stage 2 - - - - 92 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1370 - 699 841 Stage 1 - - - - 834 - Stage 2 - - - - 932 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1361 - 691 835 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 691 - Stage 1 - - - - 825 - Stage 2 - - - - 932 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 9.7 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 781 - - 1361 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.7 - - 7.7 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 75 10 125 10 10 5 40 310 10 5 260 35 Future Vol, veh/h 75 10 125 10 10 5 40 310 10 5 260 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 3 02203302203 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 82 11 136 11 11 5 43 337 11 5 283 38 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 755 751 307 819 765 348 324 0 0 350 0 0 Stage 1 315 315 - 431 431 ------- Stage 2 440 436 - 388 334 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 325 340 733 294 333 695 1236 - - 1209 - - Stage 1 696 656 - 603 583 ------- Stage 2 596 580 - 636 643 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 301 322 730 224 315 692 1232 - - 1207 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 301 322 - 224 315 ------- Stage 1 664 651 - 576 557 ------- Stage 2 553 554 - 505 638 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 20 18.2 0.9 0.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1232 - - 465 299 1207 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.035 - - 0.491 0.091 0.005 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 - 20 18.2 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - 2.7 0.3 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 25 15 35 5 65 15 300 160 85 240 5 Future Vol, veh/h 0 25 15 35 5 65 15 300 160 85 240 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000101101 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 0 27 16 38 5 71 16 326 174 92 261 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 932 982 265 915 897 414 267 0 0 501 0 0 Stage 1 449 449 - 446 446 ------- Stage 2 483 533 - 469 451 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 247 249 774 253 279 638 1297 - - 1063 - - Stage 1 589 572 - 591 574 ------- Stage 2 565 525 - 575 571 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 196 219 773 204 246 637 1296 - - 1062 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 196 219 - 204 246 ------- Stage 1 578 513 - 580 563 ------- Stage 2 489 515 - 479 512 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 19.1 19.8 0.2 2.2 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1296 - - 299 357 1062 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.013 - - 0.145 0.32 0.087 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - 19.1 19.8 8.7 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.5 1.4 0.3 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 4: Kapiolani Street & Project Driveway 1 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 10 5 350 355 5 Future Vol, veh/h 10 10 5 350 355 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 11 11 5 380 386 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 779 389 391 0 - 0 Stage 1 389 ----- Stage 2 390 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 364 659 1168 - - - Stage 1 685 ----- Stage 2 684 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 362 659 1168 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 362 ----- Stage 1 682 ----- Stage 2 684 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 13.1 0.1 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1168 - 467 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.005 - 0.047 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 13.1 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 5: Kupukupu Street & Project Driveway 2 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 AM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 6 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 10 5050 Future Vol, veh/h 0 10 5050 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 0 11 5050 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 15 50050 Stage 1 5 ----- Stage 2 10 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1004 1078 - - 1616 - Stage 1 1018 ----- Stage 2 1013 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1001 1078 - - 1616 - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1001 ----- Stage 1 1015 ----- Stage 2 1013 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 8.4 0 7.2 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) - - 1078 1616 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - 0.01 0.003 - HCM Control Delay (s) - - 8.4 7.2 0 HCM Lane LOS - - A A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - 0 0 - APPENDIX C LEVEL OF SERVICE CALCULATIONS • Future Year 2021 PM Peak HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 1: Kupukupu Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 135 5 5 150 5 5 Future Vol, veh/h 135 5 5 150 5 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 55000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 147 5 5 163 5 5 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 157 0 328 155 Stage 1 - - - - 155 - Stage 2 - - - - 173 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1423 - 666 891 Stage 1 - - - - 873 - Stage 2 - - - - 857 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1416 - 660 887 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 660 - Stage 1 - - - - 865 - Stage 2 - - - - 857 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 9.8 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 757 - - 1416 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.014 - - 0.004 - HCM Control Delay (s) 9.8 - - 7.6 0 HCM Lane LOS A - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 2: Kapiolani Street & Kukuau Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 5.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 80 5 55 5 10 5 100 240 5 5 245 65 Future Vol, veh/h 80 5 55 5 10 5 100 240 5 5 245 65 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 02200401104 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 87 5 60 5 11 5 109 261 5 5 266 71 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 806 801 308 829 834 265 341 0 0 267 0 0 Stage 1 316 316 - 483 483 ------- Stage 2 490 485 - 346 351 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 300 318 732 290 304 774 1218 - - 1297 - - Stage 1 695 655 - 565 553 ------- Stage 2 560 552 - 670 632 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 263 281 728 240 269 773 1213 - - 1296 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 263 281 - 240 269 ------- Stage 1 619 649 - 505 494 ------- Stage 2 486 493 - 606 626 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 22.8 17.5 2.4 0.1 HCM LOS C C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1213 - - 352 310 1296 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.09 - - 0.432 0.07 0.004 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 0 - 22.8 17.5 7.8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C C A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 2.1 0.2 0 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 3: Kapiolani Street & Hualalai Street 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 25 5 95 35 85 5 220 55 65 310 5 Future Vol, veh/h 5 25 5 95 35 85 5 220 55 65 310 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000001100 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length ------------ Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222222222 Mvmt Flow 5 27 5 103 38 92 5 239 60 71 337 5 Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 826 792 340 778 764 270 342 0 0 300 0 0 Stage 1 482 482 - 280 280 ------- Stage 2 344 310 - 498 484 ------- Critical Hdwy 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 4.12 - - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.12 5.52 - 6.12 5.52 ------- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 2.218 - - 2.218 - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 291 322 702 314 334 769 1217 - - 1261 - - Stage 1 565 553 - 727 679 ------- Stage 2 671 659 - 554 552 ------- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 219 298 702 273 309 768 1217 - - 1260 - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 219 298 - 273 309 ------- Stage 1 562 514 - 723 675 ------- Stage 2 554 655 - 484 513 ------- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 18.4 29.1 0.1 1.4 HCM LOS C D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBREBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1217 - - 307 376 1260 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.124 0.622 0.056 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 - 18.4 29.1 8 0 - HCM Lane LOS A A - C D A A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.4 4 0.2 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 4: Kapiolani Street & Project Driveway 1 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 10 10 325 325 10 Future Vol, veh/h 5 10 10 325 325 10 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 5 11 11 353 353 11 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 734 359 364 0 - 0 Stage 1 359 ----- Stage 2 375 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 387 685 1195 - - - Stage 1 707 ----- Stage 2 695 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 383 685 1195 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 383 ----- Stage 1 699 ----- Stage 2 695 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 11.8 0.2 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1195 - 542 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.009 - 0.03 - - HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 11.8 - - HCM Lane LOS A A B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - HCM 6th TWSC Kaiaulu O Kapiolani Apartments 5: Kupukupu Street & Project Driveway 2 06/12/2019 Z:\2019\19-524 Kaiaulu O Kapiolani\FY 2021\FY 2021 PM.syn Synchro 10 Report Austin, Tsutsumi & Associates Page 5 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 0 10 5 Future Vol, veh/h 0 5 0 0 10 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 00000 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 ----- Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 22222 Mvmt Flow 0 5 0 0 11 5 Major/Minor Minor1 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 27 00000 Stage 1 0 ----- Stage 2 27 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 ----- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 ----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - - 2.218 - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 988 ----- Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 996 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 988 ----- Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 988 ----- Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 996 ----- Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0 HCM LOS - Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLn1 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h)----- HCM Lane V/C Ratio ----- HCM Control Delay (s)----- HCM Lane LOS ----- HCM 95th %tile Q(veh)-----