HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD Recommendation Report (PL-USE-2022-000006) RRenegadeUSE.cm.4.14.23
COUNTY OF HAWAI`I PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDATION
RENEGADE TOWERS,LLC
USE PERMIT APPLICATION (PL-USE-2022-000006)
Upon review of the request against the guidelines for approving a Use Permit, the
Planning Director recommends that a Use Permit to allow the construction of a non-manned
telecommunication facility consisting of an 85-foot-tall stealth `monopine' tower with
related equipment and improvements within a 2,712 square foot portion of a 14.89-acre
property, be approved by the Planning Commission. The Planning Director reserves the right
to modify and/or alter this position based upon additional information presented at the public
hearing. This approval is based on the following findings:
The applicant is requesting a Use Permit to construct a new, non-manned
telecommunication facility, consisting of an 85-foot-tall stealth `monopine' tower
(adorned to resemble a pine tree), an antenna array consisting of 2 tri-sectors with 12
antennas per tri-sector for a total of 24 antennas, 4 surge suppressors mounted on sector
stand-off arms, 5 equipment cabinets, 2 emergency generators, 2 GPS antenna, 1 fiber
distribution box, 2 automatic transfer switches, and 2 power protection cabinets (PPC)
cabinets. All ground equipment and monopine tower will be mounted on a raised
concrete pad. No exterior lighting is proposed on the tower and only security lighting,
meeting with the County's lighting ordinance, will be mounted somewhere near the
ground equipment. The 2,112-square foot (36' x 58'-8") equipment leased area will be
enclosed with a 6-foot-high chain-link fence with woven green privacy slats. The lease
area will be accessed via a 50-foot long by 12-foot wide (600 square foot) compacted
gravel ingress/egress road from Donahue Road. The proposed facility will be unmanned,
however, maintenance and repair activities will be performed by a technician on a
periodic basis,typically once a month within normal working hours.
The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 704, as amended, recognizes the
absence of health hazards from wireless radio wave transmissions and prohibits local
-1-
authorities from regulating the placement of such towers based on environmental effects,
so long as the towers comply with the Federal Communication Commission's (FCC)
guidelines. The applicant and subsequent tenant telecommunication service providers will
comply with all Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) rules.
The objective of the new facility is to improve the existing cell phone coverage by
filling spotty coverage in the nearby residential neighborhoods as well as coverage on
Hawai'i Belt Road. The proposed facility enhances police and fire protection by
extending wireless voice and data services to remote land areas so that emergency and
public safety officials can be contacted in the event of an emergency. The new facility
will also provide the area with high-speed wireless broadband.
The monopine tower will be designed to accommodate the co-location of up to
four (4) telecommunication carriers. According to the applicant, in addition to Verizon
Wireless (anchor tenant), T-Mobile has expressed interest in co-locating in the future to
provide expanded coverage to the surrounding area. Verizon Wireless has also reached
out to AT&T but has not yet received confirmation of interest. Further, Verizon Wireless
has made diligent effort to co-locate on a nearby tower, but it could not provide them
with the necessary coverage needed. There are no other existing telecommunication
facilities or tall structures available for co-location around the proposed facility.
According to the applicant, the proposed 85-foot-tall tower height is necessary to
overcome topography and tall trees. The tower height will ensure the proper line of sight
needed to extend service to the surrounding area and as far along Hawai'i Belt Road as
possible. If the tower height were reduced, it would reduce the coverage footprint of
Verizon Wireless and other carriers who would co-locate on the tower.
The Zoning Code requires a Use Permit for telecommunication antennas and
towers in the County's Agricultural-20 acres (A-20a) zoning district. In considering a
Use Permit for any proposed use, Rule 7 of the Planning Commission Rules of Practice
and Procedure,relating to Use Permits, requires that such action conform to the following
guidelines:
-2-
A. The granting of the proposed use shall be consistent with the general
purpose of the zoned district, the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code
and the County General Plan;
B. The granting of the proposed use shall not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare nor cause substantial adverse impact to the community's
character or to surrounding properties; and
C. The granting of the proposed use shall not unreasonably burden public
agencies to provide roads and streets, sewers, water, drainage, school
improvements,police and fire protection and other related infrastructure.
The proposed request meets the guidelines for approval of a Use Permit, for the
reasons outlined below:
The granting of the proposed use shall be consistent with the general purpose
of the zoning district, the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code and the County
General Plan. The Use Permit process provides an avenue to review and analyze a
proposed project on a case-by-case basis relative to infrastructure and impacts on
surrounding properties and existing uses, as well as consistency with the goals and
policies of the General Plan.
The Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) Map component of the General
Plan is a representation of the document's goals and policies to guide the coordinated
growth and development of the County. It reflects a graphic depiction of the physical
relationship among the various land uses. The LUPAG Map establishes the basic urban
and non-urban form for areas within the County. The General Plan designation for this
property is Extensive Agriculture, which includes lands that are not capable of producing
sustained, high agricultural yields without the intensive application of modern farming
methods and technologies due to certain physical constraints such as soil composition,
slope, machine till ability, and climate. Allowable uses within these areas may include
community and public facilities. The request is also consistent with the Land Use,
Economic, and Public Utilities elements of the General Plan.
The telephone is an essential means of voice communication for the majority of
residents in Hawaii County. However, over the last decade, the County has seen
acceleration in the development of telecommunication technology and a transformation
-3-
of the telecommunications industry. In addition to traditional phone communication, the
telecommunications industry now includes technologies such as wireless cellular, digital
mobile phones, and the internet. During the last decade, wireless telecommunications has
experienced a dramatic decrease in cost and a phenomenal increase in availability.
Changes in technology and competition in the industry have made wireless
communication more affordable to the general public.
Advances in telecommunications are not without cost or concerns. One such
concern is the construction and location of telecommunication towers.
Telecommunication towers are the physical structures to which antennas are attached to
facilitate wireless communication. Because of the need for a clear line-of-site,
telecommunication towers are usually located in areas with minimum obstructions
between the tower and its area of service. Line-of-site refers to the imaginary line
between a mobile phone antenna and a telecommunication tower. If there are
impediments between the mobile phone antenna and the telecommunication tower, there
may be signal degradation or signal loss. For example, the loss of line-of-sight occurs
when a person uses a mobile phone while driving through a tunnel. Most often,
communication is lost or unclear. The line-of-sight requirement often necessitates the
conspicuous location of many telecommunication towers. Consequently, the
telecommunications tower is usually much taller than the surrounding structures or
vegetation and may negatively impact the scenic nature of a given area.
A standard in the Public Utilities element of the General Plan states that in the
development and placement of telephone facilities, such as lines,telecommunications and
cellular towers, poles, and substations, the design of the facilities shall consider the
existing environment, and scenic view and vistas shall be considered and preserved
where possible. To lessen any adverse visual impacts on surrounding properties, the
proposed facility is set back approximately 58 feet from Donahue Road and
approximately 330 feet from Hawai'i Belt Road. Additionally, the applicant is proposing
to develop a stealth `monopine' tower which will be disguised as a pine tree to blend with
the surrounding environment. There are no General Plan designated natural beauty sites
or vistas located in the vicinity of the subject property. The applicant included a viewshed
-4-
analysis and photo simulations showing the proposed tower in relation to the vegetation
and dwellings from various locations surrounding the subject property.
The Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP), adopted by the Hawaii
County Council on September 25, 2008, and most recently amended on September 18,
2019, identifies the preferred land use pattern for the Kona districts. The subject property
is located outside of the Kona Urban Area and outside of any Rural Town Areas.
Based on the preceding, the request is consistent with the general purpose of the
zoned district, the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code and the County of Hawaii
General Plan.
The granting of the proposed use shall not be materially detrimental to the
public welfare nor cause substantial, adverse impact to the community's character
or to surrounding properties. The proposed facility will be located in a 2,112-square
foot lease area situated in the northwest corner of the property located approximately 58
feet from the nearest edge of Donahue Road. The closest structure on the neighboring
property is a dwelling located over 200 feet towards the northeast. On the subject
property the closest structure is a single-family dwelling that is located approximately
200 feet towards the southwest.
Properties situated immediately to the north, east, and south are zoned
Agricultural (A-la, A-8a, and A-20a). These properties range in size from about 1 acre to
21 acres. Properties to the west, across Hawai'i Belt Road, are zoned Agricultural-5 acres
(A-5a) and Single-Family Residential-20,000 square feet (RS-20). These properties range
in size from about .17 acres to 3 acres. The properties surrounding the subject property
are being used for churches, dwellings, and agriculture.
According to the applicant, the facility operates virtually noise-free beyond 100
feet from the project area, and the operation of the antenna does not present health
hazards or cause interference with other electronic appliances and equipment.
Furthermore, traffic to the project will be consistent with routine maintenance and repair
activities, performed by a technician on a periodic basis, typically once a month within
normal working hours.
-5-
As discussed above, the main impact on the surrounding community will be
visual, however, that impact will be mitigated with the development of a stealth
`monopine' tower. No exterior lighting is proposed on the tower and only security
lighting, meeting with the County's lighting ordinance, will be mounted somewhere near
the ground equipment, which given the distance from the nearest dwelling, site
vegetation, and topography of the area, should not negatively impact the surrounding
community.
It is anticipated that the surrounding community will benefit from improved cell
phone coverage as the proposed telecommunication facility will address spotty coverage
in nearby residential neighborhoods including, but not limited to, Kona Palisades, Kona
Highlands, Kona Coast View, Kaiulani Estates, and along Hawai'i Belt Road. Further, it
will enhance police and fire protection by extending wireless voice and data services to
remote land areas so that emergency and public safety officials can be contacted in the
event of an emergency.
Therefore, based on the above, the proposed use shall not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare nor cause substantial, adverse impact to the
community's character or to surrounding properties.
The granting of the proposed use will not unreasonably burden public
agencies to provide roads and streets, sewer, water, drainage, school improvements,
police and fire protection and other related infrastructure. Access to the facility will
be off Donahue Road which extends mauka of Hawaii Belt Road. The proposed access
driveway will be compacted dirt 12 feet wide and approximately 50 feet long. The
proposed use will require fiber optics and electricity. Electricity is located on the
overhead utility poles at Mamalahoa Highway adjacent to the subject parcel. No public
expenditures for road, street, sewer, water, drainage, school, or increased police or fire
protection are required.
Finally, the applicant and/or any telecommunication service provider tenant will
be required to meet all applicable agency requirements, including the Federal
Communications Commission and the Federal Aviation Administration.
-6-
In addition to the criteria for granting a Use Permit, the request is not
contrary to Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statutes, relating to Coastal Zone
Management Area. The subject property is located about 4.7 miles from the nearest
shoreline and is not located in the Special Management Area, and therefore will not be
impacted by coastal hazards and beach erosion. There are no identified coastal
recreational resources, coastal scenic and open space resources, coastal ecosystems, and
beach or marine resources in the area, thus the proposed request will not adversely impact
coastal resources. Additionally, there is no record of a designated public access to the
shoreline or mountain areas that traverses the property and no gathering or other
traditional practices have been documented.
The request will not have a significant adverse impact to traditional and
customary Hawaiian Rights. In view of the Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH"
and "Ka Pa`akai O Ka Aina" decisions, the issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering
and fishing rights must be addressed in terms of the cultural, historical, and natural
resources and the associated traditional and customary practices of the site:
Investigation of valued resources: A cultural resources review, field inspection,
and consultation with native Hawaiian organizations was completed in an Archaeological
Inventory Survey (AIS) by Scientific Consultant Services (SCS) and included in a report
dated July 11, 2022.
The valued cultural, historical, and natural resources found in the area: The AIS
indicated that there are four sites that are eligible for listing on the National Register of
Historic Places and/or on the Hawai'i Register of Historic Places located within the 0.5-
mile radius of the area of potential effects (APE). The sites include three churches and the
ruins of a fourth church. The report also indicates that there are historic properties
documented within a 0.25-mile radius of the proposed facility site. Site 50-10-28-31352
is documented in the AIS and consists of an agricultural complex comprised of five
features (3 terraces and 2 rock mounds). However, there were no historic subsurface
remains identified after completing a single test unit and 3 stratigraphic trenches. Site 50-
10-28-31352 was interpreted as a late pre-Contact to early post-Contact era agricultural
-7-
site. It was assessed as significant under Criterion d, pursuant to HAR § 13-284-6, and as
adequately documented.
Possible adverse effect or impairment of valued resources: Native plants and/or
endangered species are unlikely to be impacted due to the already impacted residential
development. However, an inadvertent finding condition will be added in the unlikely
event resources are discovered on the property during construction activities.
Feasible actions to protect native Hawaiian rights: According to the applicant, no
gathering is taking place on the site. Thus, to the extent to which traditional and
customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised, the proposed action will not affect
traditional Hawaiian rights; therefore, no action is necessary to protect these rights. An
inadvertent finding condition will be added in the unlikely event resources are discovered
on the property during construction activities.
In a letter dated February 28, 2023, the Department of Land and Natural
Resources-State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) and State Historic Preservation
Officer's (SHPD) concurred that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed
project and that preservation of Site 50-10-28-31352 is not recommended.
Lastly, this approval is made with the understanding that the applicant remains
responsible for complying with all other applicable governmental requirements in
connection with the approved use, prior to its commencement or establishment upon the
subject properties. Additional governmental requirements may include the issuance of
building permits, the installation of approved wastewater disposal systems, compliance
with the Fire Code, installation of improvements required by the American with
Disabilities Act (ADA), among many others. Compliance with all applicable
governmental requirements is a condition of this approval; failure to comply with such
requirements will be considered a violation that may result in enforcement action by the
Planning Department and/or the affected agencies.
Based on the above, it is recommended that the request to construct a non-
manned telecommunication facility consisting of an 85-foot-tall, stealth "monopine"
tower with related equipment be approved by the Planning Commission. Approval
of this request is subject to the following conditions:
-8-
1. The applicant, its successors, or assigns ("Applicant") shall be responsible for
complying with all stated conditions of approval.
2. Construction and operation of the telecommunication facility shall be conducted
in a manner that is substantially representative of plans and details as contained
within the Use Permit application dated March 15, 2023, and representations
made to the Leeward Planning Commission.
3. Construction of the telecommunication facility shall be completed within five (5)
years from the effective date of this permit. Prior to construction, the applicant,
successors, or assigns shall secure Final Plan Approval for the proposed
development from the Planning Director in accordance with Section
25-2-71(c)(3), 25-2-72, 25-2-74 and 25-4-12, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code), Hawaii
County Code. Plans shall identify proposed structures, fire protection measures,
access easements and any fencing associated with the use. The tower/antenna
plans shall be stamped by a licensed structural engineer.
4. Prior to commencement of operation of the facility, the Applicant shall secure and
finalize any building permits for the proposed use required by the Department of
Public Works - Building Division.
5. Co-location of antennas upon the proposed tower and the addition of related
support and ground equipment is required within the parameters of the tower
height and ground lease area as approved by the Planning Commission without
amendment of this permit or further Plan Approval. Co-location beyond the
parameters approved by this permit but that results in less than a `substantial
change' to the tower height and ground lease area, as defined by the Federal
Communication Commission, is allowed without amendment of this permit,
provided Plan Approval has been issued by the Planning Director for the co-
location. Co-location that results in a `substantial change' to the tower height and
ground lease area, as defined by the Federal Communication Commission,
requires an amendment of this permit.
6. To protect any Hawaiian hoary bats in the vicinity of the property, barbed wire
fencing shall not be used in the permit area and woody vegetation over fifteen
-9-
(15) feet in height shall not be disturbed,trimmed, or removed during bat birthing
and pup rearing season of June 1st to September 15th without first conducting
surveys for bat nests and coordinating with US Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS) if nests are found. Surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist.
7. To protect any seabirds (Hawaiian petrels,Newell's shearwaters and band-
rumped storm petrel) in the vicinity of the property, any lighting shall be fully
shielded so that the bulb can only be seen from below bulb height. The lights shall
be turned off when human activity is not occurring in the lighted area.
8. To protect any Hawaiian hawks in the vicinity of the property, ground clearing,
grubbing activities and construction shall not occur in the permit area during
hawk breeding season of March to September without first conducting surveys for
hawk nests and coordinating with the USFWS if nests are found. Surveys shall be
conducted by a qualified biologist.
9. To prevent the spread of Rapid `Ohi`a Death, a survey of the proposed site shall
be conducted two weeks prior to any tree cutting to determine if there are any
infected `6hi`a trees. If infected `6hi`a are suspected at the site,the Applicant
shall contact the appropriate agencies at UH-Hilo and USDA for further guidance.
If`6hi`a trees will be cut during construction,the Applicant shall follow
procedures as determined by the USFWS.
10. In the event that surface or subsurface historic resources, including human
skeletal remains, structural remains (e.g., rock walls, terraces, platforms, etc.),
cultural deposits, marine shell concentrations, sand deposits, or sink holes are
identified during the demolition and/or construction work, the Applicant shall
cease work in the immediate vicinity of the find, protect the find from additional
disturbance and contact the State Historic Preservation Division at (808)
933-7651. Subsequent work shall proceed upon an archaeological clearance from
DLNR-SHPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation measures have been taken.
11. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable rules, regulations, and
requirements of the affected agencies for the proposed development, including the
-10-
Federal Aviation Administration and Federal Communications Commission. All
exterior lighting shall be shielded.
12. Within 120 days of the permanent abandonment of the tower, the Applicant shall
remove the tower and its antenna and accessory structures (including the
equipment building and the fence), down to, but not including the concrete
foundation. The Applicant shall immediately provide written notification to the
Planning Director of the termination of the telecommunication tower and related
improvements and the removal of all structures.
13. An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions of the permit may
be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances:
A. Non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been
foreseen or are beyond the control of the Applicant and that are not the
result of their fault or negligence.
B. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan
or the Zoning Code.
C. Granting of the extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for
the granting of the permit.
D. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period
originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed
within one year may be extended for up to one additional year).
14. Should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a timely
fashion,the Director may initiate procedures to revoke this permit.
-11-