J. Matlock 48 hours Testimony 05.31.23

Home

From: ianet Matlock To: LPCtestimony;WPCtestimony Subject: Shoreline Setback and SMA-Oppose Date: Wednesday, May 31,2023 1:05:47 PM Aloha Members of the Leeward and Windward Planning Commissions, First off, mahalo to Commissioner Vitousek for opening discussion on concerns with the first draft of the Planning Director's proposed amendments to Shoreline Setback and SMA requirements. Also, mahalo to the Commissions for asking how kuleana lands might receive appropriate consideration compared to other, often profit-driven, developers. A surprise addressed in your hearing on April 20 was the insertion of language granting the Planning Director ability to waive public hearings. Given that the County Council recently curtailed the Planning Director's authority regarding administrative extensions of project deadlines, this attempt seemed a little tone-deaf. Mahalo to the Commissions for recognizing the importance of public input. There are many concerns with the proposed language, beginning with dilution of the requirements for archeological review. This is alarming, given the incredible history here that is so fragile, and so easily destroyed forever. Should we not take note of O`ahu's decision: "Starting in.Iuly 2024,�shoreline setbacks/ will increase to between 60 to 130 feet. depending on the coastal erosion rate and location and size ofthe development." (his://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2023/02/23/honolulu-city- council-unanimouslybasses-2-bills-combat-rising-sea-levels/) I have a question: What is the rush to vote right now? (Is there a development that is anxious to be approved immediately?If so, surely that can be addressed appropriately.) Why did the Planning Director not want to take time to discuss each of the items in the proposed amendments? Why does our County administration want this language reviewed and approved so quickly, and all in one piece? (See transcript of Joint LPC/WPC meeting 4/20/23 where Director Kern asked the Commissioners to point out where they were opposed, in order to "save on time" and efficiency...) By comparison, Maui County held two years of public meetings (hUs://www.mauicounty.gov/416/Coastal-Zone-Management-Program) and issued multiple FAQ updates. What is the rush? If we're already adhering to State MINIMUM requirements, why not take time to publicly discuss what is best for the use and preservation of Hawaii Island's unique and precious shoreline and Special Management Areas? These are complex and critically important issues. Please defer voting on specific language, and instruct the Planning Department to initiate more public outreach and hearings. Please take the time to address changes to our Shoreline Setbacks and SMA language thoughtfully and thoroughly.