HomeMy WebLinkAboutJ. Matlock 48 hours Testimony 05.31.23 From: ianet Matlock
To: LPCtestimony;WPCtestimony
Subject: Shoreline Setback and SMA-Oppose
Date: Wednesday, May 31,2023 1:05:47 PM
Aloha Members of the Leeward and Windward Planning Commissions,
First off, mahalo to Commissioner Vitousek for opening discussion on concerns with the first
draft of the Planning Director's proposed amendments to Shoreline Setback and SMA
requirements. Also, mahalo to the Commissions for asking how kuleana lands might receive
appropriate consideration compared to other, often profit-driven, developers.
A surprise addressed in your hearing on April 20 was the insertion of language granting the
Planning Director ability to waive public hearings. Given that the County Council recently
curtailed the Planning Director's authority regarding administrative extensions of project
deadlines, this attempt seemed a little tone-deaf.
Mahalo to the Commissions for recognizing the importance of public input.
There are many concerns with the proposed language, beginning with dilution of the
requirements for archeological review. This is alarming, given the incredible history here that
is so fragile, and so easily destroyed forever.
Should we not take note of O`ahu's decision: "Starting in.Iuly 2024,�shoreline setbacks/ will
increase to between 60 to 130 feet. depending on the coastal erosion rate and location and
size ofthe development." (his://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2023/02/23/honolulu-city-
council-unanimouslybasses-2-bills-combat-rising-sea-levels/)
I have a question: What is the rush to vote right now? (Is there a development that is
anxious to be approved immediately?If so, surely that can be addressed appropriately.)
Why did the Planning Director not want to take time to discuss each of the items in the
proposed amendments? Why does our County administration want this language reviewed and
approved so quickly, and all in one piece? (See transcript of Joint LPC/WPC meeting 4/20/23
where Director Kern asked the Commissioners to point out where they were opposed, in order
to "save on time" and efficiency...)
By comparison, Maui County held two years of public meetings
(hUs://www.mauicounty.gov/416/Coastal-Zone-Management-Program) and issued multiple
FAQ updates.
What is the rush? If we're already adhering to State MINIMUM requirements, why not take
time to publicly discuss what is best for the use and preservation of Hawaii Island's unique
and precious shoreline and Special Management Areas?
These are complex and critically important issues. Please defer voting on specific language,
and instruct the Planning Department to initiate more public outreach and hearings.
Please take the time to address changes to our Shoreline Setbacks and SMA language
thoughtfully and thoroughly.
Mahalo nui loa to all of you for your volunteer time and attention to preservation of our
County.
j anet Matlock
Kailua Kona