Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />COUNTY OF HAWAII <br />HEARING TRANSCRIPT <br />SEPTEMBER 3, 2004 <br />PHIL KNIERIM (REZ 04-011) <br />A regularly advertised hearing on the application of <br />was called to order at 9:18 a.m. in the King Kamehameha's Kona Beach Hotel, <br />Kamakahonu Ballroom, 75-5660 Palani Road, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, with Chairman <br />Fred Galdones presiding. <br />PRESENT:Fred GaldonesABSENT & EXCUSED: Bill P. Thibadeau <br />C. Kimo AlamedaRene€ Siracusa <br />Earl Fujikawa <br />BillGraham <br />Jeffrey McCall <br />Hannah Springer <br />Francis Smith <br />Ivan Torigoe, Deputy Corporation Counsel <br />Chris Yuen, Planning Director <br />Norman Hayashi, Planning Program Manager <br />Jeff Darrow, Staff Planner <br />Kiran Emler representing Department of Public Works <br />And approximately 18 people from the public in attendance <br />APPLICANT: PHIL KNIERIM (REZ 04-011) <br />Change of Zone from an Agricultural 20-acre (A-20a) to a Family Agricultural 3-acre <br />(FA-3a) district for approximately 20.477 acres of land. The property is located along the <br />north side of Kaloko Drive at the northern corner of Kaloko Drive and Mahi Street, <br />Kaloko Mauka Subdivision, Kaloko, North Kona, Hawaii, TMK: 7-3-25: 7. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, we are on Agenda Item No. 2. The Applicant is <br />Phil Knierim (REZ 04-011). This is a Change of Zone from an Agricultural 20-acre <br />(A-20a) to a Family Agricultural 3-acre (A-3a) district for approximately 20.477 acres of <br />land. Norman? <br />HAYASHI:Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just a matter of correction. A <br />typographical error on the agenda, as well as the first page of Background Report. It does <br />state that the request is from a Family Agricultural 3-acre. However, in parenthesis it <br />says (A-3a). It should say (FA-3a). <br />The property, again, is located within the Kaloko Mauka Subdivision. It is situated along <br />the north side of Kaloko Drive, indicated by this red dot, and it€s in a low elevation of the <br />subdivision. This particular property is at the elevation of approximately 2,200 feet, so it <br />would be outside of that area as discussed in the resolution. <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />