HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-11-24 TDELUZ TRUCKING
LEEWARD PLANNING COMMISSION
COUNTY OF HAWAI‘I
HEARING TRANSCRIPT
NOVEMBER 24, 2010
EDWIN DELUZ TRUCKING AND
A regularly advertised hearing on the application of
GRAVEL, LLC (SPP 164/LUC 70-85)
was called to order at 10:16 a.m. in the King
Kamehameha's Kona Beach Hotel, Ballroom I, 75-5660 Palani Road, Kailua-Kona, Hawai‘i, with
Chairman Frederic Housel presiding.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Frederic Housel, Lani Bowman, Thomas Hickcox and Richard
Nelson
ABSENT AND EXCUSED: Brandi Beaudet, Geraldine Giffin and Wayne Iokepa
STAFF PRESENT: Brandon Gonzalez (Deputy Corporation Counsel), BJ Leithead Todd
(Planning Director), Daryn Arai (Planning Program Manager), Jeff Darrow (Staff Planner) and
Maija Cottle (Staff Planner)
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: Kiran Emler (Engineering Division)
And approximately ten people from the public in attendance.
APPLICANT: EDWIN DELUZ TRUCKING AND GRAVEL, LLC (SPP 164/LUC 70-85)
Amendment to Condition No. 2 of Special Permit No. 164 (LUC Docket SP70-85) to extend the life
of the permit from December 11, 2010 to December 11, 2015. Special Permit No. 164 allowed for
the continued operation of the Pu‘u Hinai Quarry on approximately 63.648 acres of land situated
within the State Land Use Agricultural District. The subject property is situated approximately
4,600 feet south of Waikoloa Road and 1.3 miles southeast of Waikoloa Village, Waikoloa, South
Kohala, Hawai‘i, TMK: 6-8-002: portion of 16.
HOUSEL: The next item on our agenda is Item 2. This is Edwin Deluz Trucking and Gravel,
LLC. This is an amendment to Condition No. 2 of Special Permit No. 164 and the Land Use
Commission Docket to extend the life of the permit from December 11, 2010 to December 11,
2015. There is a special permit, No. 164, allowed for continued operation of the Pu‘u Hinai Quarry
on approximately 63.648 acres of land situated within the State Land Use Agricultural Use District.
Do we have anyone who would like to testify on this matter?
One more thing that I didn’t cover on the previous item was that there were no people who signed
up to testify on that one – just a matter of housekeeping.
Is anyone here that would like to testify on this matter? Please sign up, if you can.
GLASS: I do.
HOUSEL: You do? Okay, have you signed up -?
GLASS: I signed the little form and gave (inaudible).
1
EXHIBIT B
HOUSEL: Okay. I think we’ll start with our staff. Mr. Darrow, would you like to proceed?
DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good morning, Mr. Chairman and Members of the
Planning Commission. If I can direct your attention to our presentation on the wall. Our next
applicant is Edwin Deluz Trucking and Gravel, LLC. They are requesting an amendment to
Condition No. 2 of Special Permit No. 70-85, or in the Planning Commission we refer to as Special
Permit No. 164. The location of this application is within the South Kohala District. More
specifically, we are looking in the Waikoloa area. The actual subject property is identified in a
black outline. For reference, this line running in a north-south direction on the right side of the map
is the Hawai‘i Belt Road, running in an east-west direction, mauka-makai, is the Waikoloa Road,
and this general area here is Waikoloa Village. This particular property is approximately 1,700
acres in size. The permit area for Quarry Site 1 is approximately 63 acres in size. The colors on the
map represent the different zoning. This is a little closer view, which shows the different zonings.
The particular property is zoned Agricultural 5-acre. Of interest would be the adjoining properties
to the north, which are zoned RA 1-acre, as well as Open zoning, and that’s referred to in Condition
No. 2. This is the USGS map, which identifies Pu‘u Hinai in the western corner of this particular
portion of the property. This is an aerial photo, which shows the particular area that’s been mined
on the pu‘u since 1970. This particular application has received its original approval in 1970 from
the Land Use Commission, and so this has been a continual operation since 1970.
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Condition No. 2 to extend the life of the permit for an
additional five years from December 11, 2010 to December 11, 2015 to allow the continued
operation at Quarry Site No. 1. Condition No. 2 currently states, “Quarry operations at Site 1 (Pu‘u
Hinai Quarry) shall be terminated by December 11, 2010, or prior to final subdivision approval of
the increment of adjacent RA zoned lands which abut the quarry boundaries, or prior abandonment,
whichever occurs first.” As referenced earlier, the adjoining RA-1 zoned lands are currently, have
received a revised tentative subdivision approval; they have not received final subdivision approval
as of yet. But there is always the possibility that that could occur in this particular five-year period.
This is the South Kohala Community Development Plan for the Waikoloa Village. As you can see
on the lower portion of the map, Pu‘u Hinai is referenced on the map. The actual plan does speak
specifically to Pu‘u Hinai, and I’ve brought that up here; it’s under Strategy 2.2, which the title is to
“Preserve Waikoloa’s Scenic Views, Landscapes, and Pu‘u” – “Waikoloa has as many pu‘u if not
more, than its sister town of Waimea, many of which have names that convey traditional stories of
this ahupua‘a. The pu‘u named Hinai in the vicinity of Waikoloa and several other pu‘u in the
district are being mined. Mining and also the encroachment of development have degraded the
condition of several pu‘u in the district. These pu‘u should be protected and preserved in their
natural state.” So this is directly from the current Community Development Plan in the area.
Also, I’d like to bring to your attention a new condition that we are adding in response to the South
Kohala Community Development Plan: “Mining of Pu‘u Hinai shall immediately cease to protect
and preserve the pu‘u in compliance with the South Kohala Community Development Plan.” Also,
Conditions No. 4 and 5. Condition No. 4 which is a current condition, states that “upon termination
of operations or abandonment of any portion of Site 1 (Pu‘u Hinai Quarry), the land shall be graded
to blend with the surrounding areas and re-vegetated. Further, the sites shall be left in a non-
hazardous condition.” As a result of this new condition stating that the mining shall cease for this
particular area of the Quarry Site 1, Condition 4 triggers. And so what we’ve done is implement
Condition No. 5 which states that “the applicant shall submit a soils report of the mined area of Pu‘u
Hinai by an engineer qualified in the field of soil mechanics and licensed within the State of
2
EXHIBIT B
Hawai‘i within ninety days from the effective date of this amendment. The soils report, which shall
provide recommendations for the stabilization of Pu‘u Hinai, shall be submitted to the Planning
Director for review and approval, in consultation with the Department of Public Works. The
applicant shall comply with the recommendation(s) of the approved soils report to stabilize the pu‘u
and bring it into a non-hazardous condition. Additionally, the applicant shall comply with any other
measures determined by the Planning Director to provide reasonable assurance of the stability of
Pu‘u Hinai and the safety of people who may work or have reason to be in close proximity to the
pu‘u.” So again, these are two added conditions that we are adding as a result of the South Kohala
Community Development Plan.
These are some site photos. This is from Hawai‘i Belt Road, looking makai. This is the access road
off of Waikoloa Road; this is approximately 4,600 feet in length from Waikoloa Road to the pu‘u.
This is a site photo of the area that has been mined. This particular area hasn’t been mined for over
a two-year period. You can see, again, the cuts on the back side, or on the makai side, of the pu‘u.
There is some existing equipment. In response to this, the applicant has stated that there are other
areas within Quarry Site 1 that the applicant will be considering mining, and this is an area – this is
just makai of the pu‘u.
The Planning Director is recommending that the Planning Commission send a favorable
recommendation to the State Land Use Commission with the added conditions. Are there any
questions?
BOWMAN: Could you show us the aerial of Pu‘u Hinai? So, with, I guess, Condition 5 (sic),
when you talk about “shall be graded to blend with the surrounding areas and re-vegetated,” that
whole side of the pu‘u where it’s -.How do they do that? I mean it’s gone -.
DARROW: Well, I think in this particular case – and again I’m just going off a past experience
with a quarry site that’s been abandoned, it hasn’t been particularly on a pu‘u, it’s just been in an
area that’s been quarried, and so they had to kind of blend it and then re-vegetated it – as far as a
pu‘u, I think the more, the greater concern is to leave this in a non-hazardous condition; I don’t
think, at this time, to say to re-vegetate it. It’s not vegetated currently except unless there is some
sort of vegetation currently on the front side of it. But I think in a matter of time, if there is
vegetation on the front side, it will occur on the back side. But more importantly, we need to be
able to determine that this particular area is left in a non-hazardous condition.
BOWMAN: And that would be determined by the soils engineers.
DARROW: Engineer, correct. Whether it’s through, whether they say that it is currently stable,
maybe what could be required by the Planning Director is a fence be placed there, so that no access
would be allowed into this particular area, or if the soils engineer may suggest possible benching or
something.
BOWMAN: Okay. And how close is the proposed new subdivision from this pu‘u?
DARROW: It’s just to the northwest adjoining area.
BOWMAN: Would you say half a mile from the perimeter? I’m just curious.
3
EXHIBIT B
DARROW: I would be speculating. Maybe if we could have the applicant address that. Thank
you.
BOWMAN: Okay, thank you.
HOUSEL: Jeff, if you could go back to the aerial view. What is the area considered by Quarry 1?
Is the whole thing part of Quarry 1?
DARROW: The actual pu‘u?
HOUSEL: Well -.
DARROW: I believe it actually goes beyond this map. There is a 60-acre area.
HOUSEL: Okay, but what’s referred to in the application is as Quarry 1. Is there another quarry
also?
DARROW: There was originally, but that quarry has been taken out of this particular special
permit.
HOUSEL: So this, what we are looking at here is considered all of Quarry 1, is that right?
DARROW: Correct. And I believe that there is additional area for Quarry 1.
HOUSEL: Now, the area that you had a photo that the applicant is considering mining, is that in
this photo?
DARROW: Yes, that’s just in this location here.
HOUSEL: Okay, and that’s not part of the pu‘u.
DARROW: Correct.
HOUSEL: Okay, thank you. Any other questions of staff? Thank you, Jeff. We have the
applicants at the table. Could you please raise your right hand? Do you swear or affirm to tell the
truth about this matter now before the Leeward Planning Commission today?
APPLICANTS: Yes, I do.
HOUSEL: Thank you. If you could use the microphone. And please state your name and address,
please.
DARROW: I’m sorry, Mr. Chairman. I forgot to bring one matter to your attention, and that is –
excuse me, also, Ed and Kevin – we have received correspondence since the application was sent
out; you all should have received, there were several letters of opposition, as well as several
response letters from the applicant. Those should be in your possession. Thank you. Sorry about
that.
HOUSEL: Okay, thank you, Mr. Darrow. Please proceed.
4
EXHIBIT B
HAITSUKA: Yes, my name is Edmund Haitsuka. I represent the applicant, Edwin Deluz Trucking
and Gravel, LLC. And with me is Mr. Kevin Balog who is a representative of the applicant.
HOUSEL: And your address, please.
HAITSUKA: My address is 75-1000 Henry Street, Suite 209, Kailua-Kona, Hawai‘i 96740.
HOUSEL: And the applicant, address, please.
BALOG: Kevin Balog with Edwin Deluz Trucking and Gravel. Address: P. O. Box 368 Pa‘auilo,
Hawai‘i 96776.
HOUSEL: Thank you very much. Mr. Haitsuka, would you like to make a comment on this?
HAITSUKA: Yes, Mr. Chair. We have received the Planning Department’s report and
recommendations and we have no comments, objections or anything to add this time.
HOUSEL: Commissioners, do you have any questions of the applicant?
BOWMAN: I do. Do you know approximately how far from the, like, say, the mauka edge of the
proposed subdivision the quarry, the pu‘u, is from? Like miles-wise.
BALOG: They are based on the, actually, from where they do the actual subdivision; from the
pu‘u, it’s further from the access road, it’s about 1,000 feet. So it depends where you are asking
from where.
BOWMAN: And then – can we have the aerial again, please – and then, just to reconfirm, so that
the quarry would take place in the lower left hand area, correct?
BALOG: Correct. We actually, I think, I don’t know if it came in our stuff we submitted, we
actually haven’t actively mined any part of the cinder cone in two and half years or three years.
And down on the, you can see a little bit of a crusher, then you see - (receiving a laser pointer from
the staff). So the actual mining that we would be mining is in this area in here, right here. And you
can kind of see a gray rock right here – that’s actually what we are after is this area. And you asked
about how far, from here to the access road – I don’t know if Jeff took the, what it was – it’s about
1,000 feet, then from there to the subdivision is about another 1,000.
BOWMAN: Okay, thank you.
HOUSEL: Any other questions? One question: The area that we are looking at now is part of the
pu‘u, the condition No. 3 which says, “Mining of Pu‘u Hinai shall Immediately cease …,” so there
would be no more activity in the pu‘u, if this were approved, is that correct?
HAITSUKA: That’s correct, Mr. Chair. There hasn’t been any mining on the pu‘u for over two
and half years; I think the last mining of that was prior to maybe somewhere of 2007.
5
EXHIBIT B
HOUSEL: And, now, you can, from the photo, looking at the shadows, obviously those rock walls
have been cut, you know, considerably. One of the conditions in here says that that should be
restored. Is that your intention?
HAITSUKA: I think the intention is to mitigate it in accordance with what the Planning
Department requires; with the report from the soils engineer, I think we have better indication as to
what they would recommend. I think previous discussions were that the benches would be cut so
that there would be more of a slope to the surface. I don’t know if that’s going to be recommended
by the soils engineer. But we’ll leave it up to them.
HOUSEL: Is this property accessible from the public, by the public?
HAITSUKA: No, it’s not. It’s off of a private road.
HOUSEL: Okay. Commissioner Bowman.
BOWMAN: And this -.
BALOG: Just a little follow-up to the Chairman’s question. When you are traveling on Waikoloa
Road, there is actually a fence and a gate, and there is a sign on the gate “No Trespassing.” When
we are in operation, the gate is open, but other than that it’s locked.
HAITSUKA: And the public access is further restricted; there is a crew that’s taking out live
ordnance in the area, and they are working on that in that particular area.
HOUSEL: I see. Okay, thank you. Commissioner Bowman.
BOWMAN: Okay, I have a question, maybe from the staff. If, just say, this is denied and they
have to cease all quarry activity, then the pu‘u would be left the way it is, is that correct?
DARROW: They would have to comply with Condition 4, which is currently -.
BOWMAN: No, but -.
DARROW: We are not, that’s a current condition.
BOWMAN: But I mean, if the whole, if the extension was denied, the extension of any more
quarry activity.
DARROW: Correct. They would still have to comply with Condition No. 4.
BOWMAN: Okay, thank you.
HOUSEL: A little housekeeping, I just wanted to confirm. Did you receive the Planning
Department’s background report and recommendations on this -?
HAITSUKA: Yes, we did, Mr. Chair. Thank you.
HOUSEL: Thank you. And you agree to the conditions of the Planning Department’s report?
6
EXHIBIT B
HAITSUKA: Yes, we do. And we have no objections or comments or additions. Thank you.
HOUSEL: Okay. Let’s see, we have a – I think I’ll excuse you for now – and we have one person
who would like to testify. Could Anika Glass please come forward? Good morning.
GLASS: Good morning.
HOUSEL: Could you raise your right hand, please? Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth now
before the Leeward Planning Commission today?
GLASS: You bet. Yes, I do.
HOUSEL: Thank you. Could you state your name and address, please?
GLASS: My name is Anika Glass. I live in Waikoloa Village. I live at 68-1863 Ua Noe Street.
Waikoloa Village is across Waikoloa Road from this pu‘u, which is visible from my home and
many homes, including the currently devastated parts of it. So its current state of sad exploitation is
highly visible from all the way up Waikoloa Road, from the bottom, from just many locations – it’s
not hidden. I’m against the, I came to testify in opposition to the request that was made to you. I
was not aware of the new conditions that sounds like that have been recently set forth – those were
not published to my knowledge. So I’m a little befuddled about where to start, so if you’ll just bear
with me. I do want to re-emphasize my original points, which is the South Kohala CDP, which
people in Waikoloa Village have spent thousands of hours developing. We’ve had a good turnout at
the meeting just last night, two nights ago – very concerned about the destruction of the pu‘u, and
agree with the CDP that our landscapes and views around Waikoloa and in South Kohala should not
be destroyed like this. I further want to know that according to the facts in the County’s assessment
of this and to previous published findings, the views of the pu‘u project site are not anticipated to
adversely affect the new development; because the homes will be 30 feet high and they will be able
to see it, and so will others in Waikoloa, but if it’s not there, there is nothing to see except rubble.
It’s been previously noted that during the research on the cultural practices in this area, informants
did identify Pu‘u Hinai as being culturally significant; there is a wonderful story that goes with it.
The quarrying operations are planned to cease as development progresses in the subject project.
Further, according to the State Land Use Commission, when it approved the Waikoloa Mauka
request, final environmental impact report of Waikoloa Highlands, which is the development
proposed immediately makai, very close to the pu‘u, it stated that Deluz Trucking must quit
operations – or anyone – operations at the site be terminated by December 11, 2010 or prior to final
subdivision approval – final approval hasn’t happened – of the increments of the adjacent lots or
prior abandonment, whichever occurs first. I beg for another moment.
HOUSEL: Could you please summarize, if you can?
GLASS: Okay. It is vegetated currently; it may not look like it to you, or from that particular aerial
photograph. But our whole area is very dry like right now, and that area is vegetated. I have
concerns about the idea of a new pit and how that will be. If they are going to cease now on the
pu‘u, is that to be a permanent cessation or just for now? And then, the new quarry that they are
doing right next to the pu‘u, will that be some kind of pit mine, or what is that – I just don’t know.
So I’d like to have that clarified by someone, thank you. And thank you very much.
7
EXHIBIT B
HOUSEL: Thank you for your testimony. Commissioners, do you have any questions of the
testifier? Okay. Thank you very much for your testimony. Jeff, I had one question, looking at
Conditions 4 and 5. On your slide, these were represented, but it seems like you read more than just
here. Is that included in 4 and 5 also?
DARROW: On the slide, I was just summarizing. But 4 and 5 definitely has a lot more in the
condition.
HOUSEL: Okay, so what you were reading is included in these 4 and 5?
DARROW: Yes, I was reading it from the condition.
HOUSEL: Okay, I just wanted to make sure. Thank you.
BOWMAN: And just to clarify, too, if the final subdivision is given before 2015, then all quarry
operations will cease, is that correct?
DARROW: Currently, that’s the way that the condition reads.
BOWMAN: And can I ask, are there – and maybe this was in the background – is this the only
quarry operation in that area?
DARROW: To my knowledge, I believe that that is the only quarry operation in this particular
area. There is a number of quarry operations above the highway, mauka of the highway -.
BOWMAN: At the Saddle Road.
DARROW: Correct. And also towards Waimea up in that area.
BOWMAN: Right. Thank you.
DARROW: If I’m wrong, if the applicants can correct me.
HOUSEL: Yes, please come forward.
BALOG: Commissioner Bowman, just so the record is straight, there is actually another mine
below the Village on the, it’s not on this map, but it’s below the Village. There’s actually two – one
is abandoned and one is active. The abandoned quarry is right above the helicopter pad, and the
active mine is below the town and above the big tanks that you see on the road, and it’s operated by
West Hawai‘i Concrete.
BOWMAN: And they mine the same black and red cinder?
BALOG: Actually no. It’s, the West Hawai‘i Concrete quarry is a basalt mine, a rock mine.
BOWMAN: So yours is the only black and red cinder in that area. Is it black and red?
BALOG: In that specific area, it was the only one. Like we’ve represented, we haven’t mined
cinder or intend to mine cinder actually through the extension of the permit. We’ve bid for several,
8
EXHIBIT B
the past probably two years, on the Queen K Highway road extension with several contractors, and
the contractor that was awarded the contract. When we bid, we were bidding to sell fill material.
There is a lot of fill material that’s going to be required, and this was a site that – probably you are
wondering why we’ve been asking for an extension – that was used, that we could use to sell fill
material for the widening of Queen K. So it doesn’t have the black and red cinder, is really not a
concern. And the other part, just so you, to be upfront and honest about it, is our company actually
has a mine, a surface mine, similar to this, not with a larger cinder cone, on Parker Ranch property
and -.
BOWMAN: A mine that mines black and red cinder? Sorry.
BALOG: Yes.
BOWMAN: Okay, so this would be fill, this would not be cinder, this would be fill.
BALOG: No. And I think another question from the testifier was, she asked about creating a new
pit. Actually, when the permit was granted for the extension last time, we already said that – when
it showed that satellite view and I showed you where we would be mining – that was an area that
we said that we would already mine, and we have actually taken some fill material out of that area -.
BOWMAN: It looks like it.
BALOG: During the last time extension.
BOWMAN: Thank you.
HOUSEL: Any other questions, Commissioners, of the applicants? Would someone like to make a
motion?
BOWMAN: I would just like to make a comment. I thank the testifier. And I realize that, you
know, the pu‘u is pretty well denigrated, and I’m glad to see nothing else will happen. Maybe 30
years ago was the time when it should have been brought up.
With that been said, I move that we send a favorable recommendation for Special Permit No. 70-85
to the State Land Use Commission based on the Director’s recommendations and conditions.
HOUSEL: Motion from Commissioner Bowman. Do we have a second?
NELSON: Second.
HOUSEL: Seconded by Commissioner Nelson. Any discussion? Mr. Darrow, would you like to
take the roll, please?
DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The motion before us is to send a favorable
recommendation to the State Land Use Commission. With that, I’ll take the roll. Commissioner
Bowman?
BOWMAN: Aye.
9
EXHIBIT B
DARROW: Commissioner Nelson?
NELSON: Aye.
DARROW: Commissioner Hickcox?
HICKCOX: Aye.
DARROW: And Mr. Chairman?
HOUSEL: Aye.
DARROW: The motion passes, four to zero.
HOUSEL: Thank you. And you’ll be receiving the documentation very shortly. Thank you.
APPLICANTS: Thank you.
The discussion ended at 10:50 a.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Noriko Sauer, Secretary
Leeward Planning Commission
10
EXHIBIT B