Laserfiche WebLink
From: Gail Rhoades <br /> To: Andrews.Jessica; Lee Loy.Sue; mbrestovanskyCabhawaiitribune-herald.com;Sidney Fuke; Robert Hamilton; <br /> Jackson. Maiia; Kalysa Hamilton; Kamaluhiaokalani Mauna <br /> Subject: MANONO CORNER LLC <br /> Date: Monday,March 4, 2024 1:17:19 PM <br /> Aloha Jessica. This email contains my comments in response to Mr. Fuke's <br /> letter dated March 3, 2024 to Mr. Zendo Kern in response to my letter dated <br /> February 20, 2024. As my testimony is limited to three minutes, I can't <br /> possibly address all issues at the commission meeting. Please upload a <br /> cony of this email to the March 7th Planning Commission Agenda <br /> packet. <br /> 1 . Mr. Fuke's proposed "condition" language for the landowner to contact <br /> the Department of Health is vague and does not address the issue in <br /> its entirety. The presence of an underground petroleum storage tank <br /> that more than likely has corroded over time is a major issue. If <br /> rezoning is approved prior to this issue being addressed and resolved <br /> then the commission is indemnifying the landowner for any potential <br /> environmental hazards. I do not believe the commission has the <br /> authority to do this as I believe it would violate the County Charter. <br /> Unless the Planning Commission is going to accept any and all liability <br /> for the environmental remediation, instead of the landowner, then the <br /> Commission should pause or reject this rezoning matter until the issue <br /> is resolved. <br /> 2. My letter to Mr. Zendo Kern dated February 20, 2024 clearly asks for <br /> speed bumps to deter motorists from cutting through the proposed <br /> parking lot from Lanikaula Street to Manono Street in order to avoid the <br /> intersection. I never said nor implied that vehicles exiting the property <br /> could not exit onto Manono Street. <br /> 3. The restriction of "right turn only" movements for outbound traffic onto <br /> Manono Street from the property is the recommendation of the Public Works <br /> Department, which I concur with. <br /> 4. Prohibiting vehicle inducing entities on the proposed site in my opinion <br /> is not "cherry picking" commercial/ industrial uses. The lot size is finite so <br />