Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-02-27 PL-SMA-2023-000038 Bill and Cindy Armer Opposition Testimony 75-5888 Alii. Drive. C-12 Kailua-Kona HI. 96740 Fevruary 27, 2024 Leeward Planning Commissioners Hawaii County Planning Department 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Highway Bldg B, Kailua-Kona. HI. 96740 RE: Proposed Kona Hawaii Development 100-room hotel on AIN Drive at Kahakai Road (Application PL-5MA-2023-000038). Aloha Leeward Planning Commissioners and Hawaii County Departmental Heads, My wife and i are 20+ year residents as southern neighbors of this proposed development at the Kona Reef Condominium Complex. Every five years we are confronted with another developer's $250 proposal to exploit the land to the planning department despite the community concerns and continue previous promises or stipulations stated and ignored by the developers. 2025 gives us another opportunity to be confronted by an outrageous plan without any preparation or supportive evidence presented to the Hawaii County Commissioners. On February 29, 2024 you will hear a new applicant and "fresh proposal" from a different development company. We strongly urge you to reject this most recent proposal without hesitation due to the following considerations. • The proposal has minimal supportive data nor investigation by this developer. There have been no public informational meetings nor a shared proposal to communicate intent to the surrounding neighbors. There are no traffic studies of pedestrian, bicyclist, or vehicle traffic usage, or safety considerations in this submission submitting. We find this failure to engage or communicate with the neighbors and general community a crude attempt to fly "under the radar " with a purposely, incomplete, and deceptive insertion of a new proposal of 100 rooms in contrast with more modest prior proposals, failure to abide by existing county regulatory practices and requirements, and disregard for neighboring community views. • This developer seems destined to continue the past practice of not meeting planning department stipulations for sidewalks, general upkeep, graffiti removal, safety practices, and a questionable project proposal to continue the largest eyesore monstrosity on a public thoroughfare in Hawaii County dating back to the last century. You do not see structures like this in downtown Hilo. RCVD COH PLANNING DEP� FEB 28'24 Am10:01 • Proposals are routed to the 15-20 county department heads for them to identify any issues that will impact their area of responsibility. Why are there no red flags from police, fire, civil defense, medical, water and sewage, engineering, DOT and all the other salaried department heads on this project? Every segment of county government will all be severely stressed by the magnitude and location of this project. • The applicant did not submit traffic studies, safety proposals, pedestrian usage data, vehicle speed recommendations, a neighborhood communication plan, or traffic routing considerations for those turning into/out of the applicant entrance on North Kahakai Rd, from heavily traveled AM Drive. Alii Drive is the most used coastal road from Kailua Village to Keauhou, with only 6 mauka-makai connectors between Palani and Kamehmeha III Hwy. During the hours of 4:30 am and 10:00 pm there is no busier thoroughfare in Hawaii County with walkers, runners, strollers, auto, bicyclists, and dog walkers. During emergency coastal evacuations, there is no bigger bottleneck of panicked visitors seeking higher ground. • The neighborhood is already impacted by Royal Kona Hotel's 430 rooms and to propose a 100+room hotel on the adjacent southern property boundary is the height of developer arrogance. The applicant claims sufficient parking spaces but our experience is that inadequate parking is ever-present for all the existing tenants on AM Drive especially during events, holidays, and high season. Over three hundred people will be housed and working daily at this facility with no ocean frontage to even view the ocean. There is no question that they will migrate 24 hours a day onto all the adjacent properties--especially the green frontage area at Kona Reef. Kona Reef will need to purchase three gated entrances to our property in order to not be overrun by trespassers with nowhere else to park. The applicant is proposing to build a 40 foot tall structure on top of an existing concrete foundation. However, the construction site is located on a slope such that the makai side of the structure would be 74 feet above ground level. This clearly violates Hawaii County Zoning Code (Sect. 25-5-93)which explicitly limits the height of buildings in hoteilresort areas to 45 feet. This concrete facility is perched on top of a massive lava tube that was filled with concrete over the course of several months around 15 years ago and now they propose to add four stories of concrete on top of that precarious foundation. * The proposed 100 "Room" hotel would actually consist of 9 standard guest rooms and 91 2-bedroom suites. At 80% occupancy, there would be over 300 guests plus the necessary hotel support staff to squeeze into the 143 proposed parking spaces. The additional cars would greatly exacerbate the traffic congestion and parking issues already existing in Kailua Kona. Yet the developer has not conducted nor even requested a traffic and pedestrian safety study The emergency response services for Kailua Kona are already under severe duress. On busy days, Kealakekua's ambulance service is responsible for responding to emergency calls in Kailua. This greatly increases the response time for potentially life threatening situations due to the 10-mile drive and frequent traffic jams. It also takes critical emergency services away from the deserving residents of South Kona district. Adding more visitors to the already overcrowded resort area would increase the safety risk to both residents and visitors. We have not mentioned the obvious difficulties for over 500 visitors unfamiliar with the concept "evacuation routes" trying t oavoid panic to travel mauka upon hearing the sirens. We have seen it and it is not preety and quiet dangerous. The property has no oceanfront and nor immediate designated shoreline access. As a result, we expect that many of their guests will stray from that property to encroach onto nearby privately-owned oceanfront properties such as the Kona Reef, Hale Kona Kai, and the Royal Kona. This would dramatically and negatively impact the quality of life for long-time residents and guests. • Sadly, the Hawaii County Planning Department has already made its recommendation to the Leeward Planning Commission to approve this SMA Permit application without questioning any of these violations or concerns. We respectfully request that the Commissioners deny this application until the applicant prepares a proper and complete application for such a high impact project. We thank you in advance for your consideration of our concerns. Aloha nui loa, Bill and Cindy Armer