The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2024-02-29 PowerPoint Presentation (PL-REZ-2023-0000051) LILI ' UOKALANI TRUST AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 00 90 ( REZ 684/PL-REZ-2023-000051 ) H awali.in Homc Land 9 d v C 16 m 4Jo',y r/ 19,! oehd Ave 7�K hope Ce , Old KonaMs� Alrpart Stat'LwC 71 creation Area • K' 0 THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING: TO AMEND CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE OO 9O BY: ■ DELETING CONDITION B (TIME TO SUBMIT AND SECURE FINAL PLAN APPROVAL) ti Lu ■ DELETING CONDITION C (TIME TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION) 0 ■ DELETING CONDITION D ( EHO STREET EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS) Lu ■ DELETING CONDITION F ( ` EHO STREET/QUEEN KA`AHUMANU HIGHWAY v� INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS) Z ■ DELETING CONDITION K (ADMINISTRATIVE TIME EXTENSION) Q ■ IF DELETION OF CONDITIONS B AND C IS NOT POSSIBLE, THE APPLICANT IS U J REQUESTING A 1 O-YEAR TIME EXTENSION TO CONDITION B TO SECURE FINAL PLAN 12- APPROVAL AND TO AMEND CONDITION C TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION TO Q COMMENCE WITHIN 2 YEARS OF RECEIPT OF FINAL PLAN APPROVAL AND BE COMPLETED WITHIN 5 YEARS THEREAFTER. ■ DELETION OF CONDITION B (TIME TO SECURE PLAN APPROVAL & CONDITION C (TIME TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION : ■ THE APPLICANT BELIEVES THAT THE PROPERTY & SURROUNDING AREA HAS ALWAYS � BEEN SLATED FOR INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCIAL USES & THAT CONTINUATION OF THE w CV-1 O ZONING WOULD BE THE MOST SUITABLE LAND USE DESIGNATION. � ■ THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLETED ALL REQUIRED OFF-SITE INFRASTRUCTURE � IMPROVEMENTS & OTHER OFF-SITE INFRASTRUCTURE & SERVICES ARE ry AVAILABLE TO THE PROPERTY, MAKING THE SITE 'SHOVEL READY' FOR 0 DEVELOPMENT. U- V) ■ THE ABSENCE OF ANY ON-SITE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES (DRAINAGE,, Z ARCHAEOLOGICAL/CULTURAL, ETC.) 0 ■ THE ZONING'S CONTINUED CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN & KONA CDP. w ry ■ BASED ON THE PRECEDING, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO ALLOW THE ENTIRE PARCEL TO BE DEVELOPED AS THE MARKET DEMANDS AND NOT WITH ARTIFICIAL TIMEFRAMES ON A SMALLER PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. ■ DELETION OF CONDITIONS D ( ' EHO STREET EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS : ■ THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS TO ' EHO STREET AS REQUIRED UNDER CONDITION D AND DEDICATED THE IMPROVED ROADWAY TO THE � COUNTY VIA RESOLUTION. N w ■ DELETION OF CONDITION F ( ' EHO STREET/QUEEN KA`AHUMANU HIGHWAY Cw INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS : Q!� ■ THE APPLICANT HAS ALSO COMPLETED IMPROVEMENTS TO THE ' EHO O STREET/QUEEN KA`AHUMANU HIGHWAY INTERSECTION MEETING WITH THE u- APPROVAL OF THE DPW AND DOT AS REQUIRED BY CONDITION F. N Z ■ DELETION OF CONDITION K (ADMINISTRATIVE TIME EXTENSION : 0 cn ■ THE ZONING CODE WAS RECENTLY AMENDED TO PROHIBIT THE ADDITION OF Q w CONDITIONS TO ANY CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE WHICH ALLOWS THE � PLANNING DIRECTOR TO GRANT AN ADMINISTRATIVE TIME EXTENSION. CG-10 P�FF� gryl� REZONE AREA 0 q�Pq • SUBJECT MG-1 a PROPERTY CV-10 P Q h • - Co•^•- ni;y Meos Contributors,OOpenSt•eetMe ,Microso4 Es-i,TomTom,Garmin,S - a Q�FFti �yUMQN(r cLy� REZONE AREA • SUBJECT URBAN PROPERTY P Q h 200h . "� - C�i^-Sri:y hAa�s�oc7l�a.c's_�'Oa�nS:•ee:P;fap.hrlicre,o�.Es-: - -Tc�r �ar^-.ir_ q�tr OPEN REZONE AREA ind C SUBJECT IND PROPERTY HDU • "' ' - Coimunity Maps Contributors,®O enStreetMa ,Microsoft,Esri,TomTom,Garmin,S C, e a O 16 m Ora dnryala had' ��y � 9 4'u A . V P MAKA`EO REGIONAL CENTER TOD ot4EA � KAILUA VILLAGE REDEVELOPMENT REGIONAL CENTER TOD G �� `r r �r nr. 410 O A. �p p � t .r L� w • Q r �,,.. r. s� as !II VIEW OF `EHO STREET LOOKING MAUKA y�VIEW OF `EHO STREET LOOKING MAKAI VIEW OF REZONE AREA FROM EHO STREET Z 0 Q PLANNING DIRECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION � w FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION 0 U TO DELETE CONDITIONSLU n/ V) U w �, KAi W I STR@RT 3 I 4 _ 7 F hefi— ,ra:'.„A-!r,cr AWAw f,71. rROI'OlEtl A"VAN"l Q 5G t Mo., hrOJ.6/+S•I I J //' // (,� �- rL 11N P1-.AH MIIC (U) ;rany�..� i ter•.,, /, --.---...------------JE OTYJ.-- Q Q n re.7G[iAL � � ¢yu�aH —'Z r--------------1 `Otacnrr...ew ^ Q ? m A.HuH-1 ANu �,, r..e 1' N 19 H WAY ,GE.te'r.4L lNCL'^"'4,'%L(.iwi'.I' I ♦- �.� — '. r+s-ro o J J ,t,YEA a./f9 AFfE3 -_ _ Ii------------------- ------ M6•YI I J :ialotSNjw C-OMMERGIAL (CV-10� I eM-rn fv.w n f� Ma � cv to A1RCA• 0-074 AGrq� �/ aPis of u•e�oYw. T_ - RS-tom -... __ _ •�{ � .� ��'-'b CY le ivrvn e T 9f.9'7 ♦ `I:Y•:O .ja.o PP1"4� vrvP�-ArvMao (u) Ifora7 /rdur/.^i SuFisicn 1 L. -_ . PAL Al"f IQOAp co 'ze wMANMI 4y � �/ � -1�\ � CO•-1e Y r0 VA Y �� '� ♦x "a sc�a j ca-ae � A . KALC .._//•' /rEEF \Y::��Nl v-1.19`� • AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING CODE I , y�r� A C - 141VEX27/vaEVr ToT91If C04ATTY ZD'I;.�J ✓1.J1�/l��CL AT�1�N�ING SEGTIC>N �5-�-� (K�lt_UA l�t�HAN 2GN� MAP) A{�'7'ICI_E 9, C!-IAPTEI� '�S (zONIN� GDL7i�.) 4MdYDMgt'T Ala 8 0,- 7.04, aF THO MP.PNA I cauNTY Caa>=, gY el-tAtv�IN� /'Oi4'T.CJiLrO�OROINAN<� N0. 7f, Gt'r1.1�i-mG .;L_ THC f]IST�I�T GLA�SIFIGATt�N �I'ZdM a1��N . r/C.47VIV '1Off FXWEV= AV-/q) 70 Op:t',OV A•LC TO VILLAGE CoMM�riG1AL (CV-10� A� V/1LA6�CON,.'Y,:"{C'.4� (CY::;J/V I(�A,='(/OtiG',ND/�IHKOrtGP,f.'�WAJJ KCAHUOLU, NOI¢T1--I KONA, l--1AiNAII. ogre or�rr�a/c�.-.e%vs acr.re,ra-r PR�PAIREC BY PLANNING oE�AfZTMENT ae-e orArrvcre_' eourvTY o� I-IAWAfI enauo5cc A PRf•�RCD 9Y P AN..VIVd OG rARTh G.S'7 Ce;r.S.'>-r�r r.:yt',t!/ 7'vIK= 7-4-15� 15 PG1Q'{tOM) JAN_31, 19Ei� Tws AO :YI eXr//alr A EXHIBIT Y1A ■ HISTORICALLY, PERFORMANCE CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO REZONE ORDINANCES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL IN A TIMELY FASHION, PROVIDE A REASONABLE TIMEFRAME FOR REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, ALLOW FOR PERIODIC CHECKS TO ENSURE z THAT THE ZONING IS STILL APPROPRIATE FOR THE AREA BASED ON THE GENERAL PLAN AND COMMUNITY 0 DEVELOPMENT PLANS, AND TO CURB SPECULATION AND RESALE OF UNDEVELOPED PROPERTIES. V) z Lu ■ IN THIS CASE, THE DIRECTOR IS RECOMMENDING DELETION OF THE REMAINING TIMED PERFORMANCE II--- CONDITIONS (CONDITION B AND C) RATHER THAN GRANTING ANOTHER TIME EXTENSION FOR THE X L.0 FOLLOWING REASONS: Lu 1 . THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIKE THE OTHER LANDS IN THE KEAHUOLU AHUPUA`A ARE OWNED BY THE APPLICANT AND LIKE THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES, WILL LIKELY BE DEVELOPED UNDER LEASEHOLD AND MAY NOT BE SOLD, THUS MITIGATING THE CONCERN OVER LAND SPECULATION. > 2. THE REZONE AREA AND SUBJECT PARCEL IS SITUATED IN AN AREA THAT WAS ORIGINALLY AND HAS z BEEN CONTINUOUSLY ZONED AND DEVELOPED FOR INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL USES FOR O NEARLY SIXTY YEARS AND IS ONE OF THE FEW REMAINING LOTS YET TO BE DEVELOPED. AS SUCH, II--- LJJ NO OTHER ZONING OR LAND USE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE IN THE AREA, AND IT IS HIGHLY J UNLIKELY THAT FUTURE LAND USE PLANS WILL RECOMMEND CHANGING THE EXISTING LAND USE LJJ PATTERN. 3. THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLETED OFF-SITE INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THE CURRENT ORDINANCE TO ACCOMMODATE THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. THIS, z COMBINED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF REQUIRED UTILITIES AND SERVICES MAKES THE SITE "SHOVEL O READY" FOR DEVELOPMENT SUBJECT TO THE REMAINING REZONING CONDITIONS AND CURRENT V) DEVELOPMENT CODES, REGARDLESS OF HOW LONG IT TAKES TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY. z Lu 4. HAD THE STATE NOT NEEDED PART OF THE PROPERTY IN 1971 TO ACCOMMODATE THE WIDENING OF X LJJ THE HIGHWAY, THE REZONE AREA WOULD LIKELY HAVE BEEN SIMILARLY ZONED CV-1 O AT THAT TIME, LJJ AND NOT SUBJECT TO ANY CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL UNDER ORDINANCE 400. THIS CREATES A SITUATION WHERE ANY SUBSEQUENT TIME EXTENSION CONDITION WILL ONLY APPLY TO THE 0.874-ACRE REZONE AREA, AND NOT THE REMAINDER OF THE LARGER 4.61 -ACRE PROPERTY OF WHICH IT IS PART. THUS, DELETING THE TIMED PERFORMANCE CONDITIONS FOR THE REZONE AREA WILL BRING THE > > DIVERGENT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS OF THE ENTIRE PROPERTY INTO ALIGNMENT. z O Lu J Lu n