Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD Background Report (PL-REZ-2022-000033) (2)BKonaThreeeLLCAmendRELcrk.11.22.22 COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT KONA THREE LLC (FORMERLY GAMREX, INC.) AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 02 131 (REZ 470) KONA THREE LLC has submitted an application for a ten (10) -year time extension to Condition I (Complete Construction of the First Increment on RM Zoned lands) and an amendment to Condition N (Roadway Standards) to clarify which roadways within the subdivision are subject to the County Dedicable Standards, of Ordinance No. 02 131. Ordinance No. 02 131 was a successor ordinance to Ordinance No. 84-23, which reclassified two (2) parcels of land totaling 68.837 acres of land from an Unplanned to a Multiple Family Residential -5,000 square feet (RM -5) zoned district. The subject properties are located along the east (mauka) side of the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway at its junction with Kuakini Highway and between Pualani Estates subdivision to the north and Kona Vistas to the south, por. Hdlualoa Hui Lands, H61ualoa 1, 2, & 3, North Kona, Hawaii, TMKs: (3) 7-6-021:016 & 017. APPLICANT'S REQUEST AND REASONS Applicant's Request: The applicant is requesting to amend Condition I and Condition N of Ordnance No. 02 131. Condition I: The applicant initially requested an extension of time of ten (10) years from the effective date of the amended ordinance by which to complete construction of the first increment/phase (258 multiple -family residential units) of the proposed development. As further discussed in section 3 below, the applicant has since clarified the request to a ten (10) -year time extension to complete the entire development. Condition I currently states: "L plans for the development within the first increment of the RMzoned area shall be submitted to the Planning Department and final plan approval secured within five years from the effective date of this sixth amendment. Construction shall -1- commence within one year from the date of receipt of final plan approval and be completed within three years thereafter; " Upon securing land use entitlements in 1983 (see chronology below), then owner Gamrex Corporation and its development entity, Kona Vistas, LLC spent the next 23 years developing the initial phase of the development consisting of approximately 103.293 acres of RS -15 zoned lands into 215 single-family residential lots/units now known as the Kona Vistas subdivision. The developer secured a series of time extensions on the initial ordinance, which covered both the Kona Vistas subdivision lands and the subject properties totaling 68.837 acres (please note, due to Subdivision No. 18-00185, which consolidated and resubdivided a 1.675 -acre portion of Parcel 17 with an adjoining property, the total land area that is subject to this amendment request is 67.162 acres). The last amendment occurred in 2002, which granted a time extension until November 27, 2007, to secure Final Plan Approval for the first phase of the multiple -family residential component within the RM -5 zoned area with its planned completion no later than November 27, 2011. After substantial completion of the Kona Vistas subdivision, the owner lost interest/ability to complete the multiple -family component of the development and sold their remaining land holdings to two Hawaii -based development entities, KV3, LLC and Kona Three LLC (applicant) in 2015. Upon this purchase, both entities have made a significant financial and time commitment to complete requirements of the ordinance as well as perform additional `soft work' necessary to update and align various studies and previous obligations of the original landowner to be in a position to request additional time to complete the last remaining major residential development component that was originally envisioned by the State Land Use Commission and County Council when the entitlements were granted. Furthermore, as the ordinance was stale prior to their acquisition of the properties, the applicant found it necessary to address many project - related, supporting elements needed to be complete to ensure that this time extension request is consistent with the original reasons for granting the original land use entitlements, conforms to current land use policies, and addresses project related impacts in a responsible manner. These `soft -work' elements include: -2- ■ Completing drainage improvements within the Holualoa Drainageway in accordance with requirements of the Department of Public Works; ■ Dedication of three (3) remaining roadway lots within the Kona Vistas Subdivision to the County; ■ Secured an SMA Use Permit (SMA 430) and hired a hydrologic engineer to prepare and submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) to complete drainage improvements for a 12 -acre County affordable housing site fnakai of Kuakini Highway that was originally meant to satisfy the project's affordable housing requirements. Despite the preceding, the County no longer wishes to proceed with the development of this parcel at this time. ■ The applicant purchased Hawaii Preparatory Academy's (HPA) 5 -acre interest in the RM -zoned lands on parcel 17 as HPA decided it did not want to build a new school in Kona. As the 5 -acre area was not previously included in the original Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS), a new AIS was conducted for the area which found a previously unknown burial site in a lava tube. The applicant subsequently prepared a Burial Treatment Plan (BTP) that was approved by the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) and the Hawaii Island Burial Council. ■ The applicant was instructed to prepare a new AIS for the remaining 65 acres of RM -zoned lands within the subject properties due to the age of the original AIS report. This new AIS has been completed and approved by SHPD. ■ The applicant prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) pursuant to HRS Chapter 343 what was accepted by the Planning Department, who issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) by letter dated September 13, 2021. The EA included an updated traffic impact analysis report, biological survey, cultural impact assessment, updated AIS and site preservation plan. Also included within this process were consultations with area residents, specifically from the adjoining Kona Vistas subdivision. -3- ■ The applicant entered into a new affordable housing agreement with the County of Hawaii on January 10, 2022 to satisfy the affordable housing requirement for the entire project. Condition N: The applicant also requests to amend Condition N as follows (material to be deleted is bracketed and struck -through; new material is underlined): N. the roadways and stubout within the RM zoned area, as shown on "Figure 3 -Conceptual Building Layout" in the Final Environmental Assessment - Royal Vistas Housing Project dated September 2021, shall be constructed to dedicable standards with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County of Hawaii upon completion. [ -1 Condition N currently requires that the roadways and stubouts within the RM -zoned lands need to be built to county dedicable standards. The proposed amendment to Condition N would clarify that the main roadways identified in Figure 3 of the Final EA would be constructed to dedicable standards and ultimately dedicated to the County since the proposed alignments provide the opportunity for future connection to the larger area road network. The remainder of the roadways/driveways servicing the multiple family residential complexes will remain in private ownership and be built to non-dedicable standards. Finally, deletion of the language at the end of the condition regarding roadway telescoping will allow the applicant to avoid tearing up Kekuanao`a Place and re- constructing it to dedicable standards between its crossing at the Holualoa Ditch within the project site and its intersection within Kamehamalu Street within the Kona Vistas subdivision to the south. 2. Proposed Development: Although the current RM -5 zoning would allow the development of up to 585 residential units on the 67.162 -acre project site, the applicant -4- proposes to construct the "Royal Vistas" project as a 450 -unit, multiple family residential housing project with: ■ 174, two- and three-bedroom `for rent' units and a manager's unit within two- story buildings on the makai portion of the project area. ■ 274, two- and three-bedroom `for sale' units, and a manager's unit, to be developed in clusters of two- and three-story buildings partially on the makai portion and the remainder on the mauka portion of the project area. ■ Two (2) community centers, one for the `for rent' units and one for the `for sale' units. Each community center will include a neighborhood park, pool, and facilities for use by residents. ■ Parking will be made available via on-site, paved parking lots and covered structures. ■ Roadways as further discussed below in the access section. ■ Drainage improvements are further discussed below in the flood zone/drainage section. 3. Project Phasing, Timetable, and Cost: According to the applicant, the project will be developed in two or more phases, with Phase I having a maximum of 258 units (include all the `for rent' units and some `for sale' units) to be constructed on no more than 42 acres within the makai portion of the subject parcels ("project site") and Phase II of the having the balance of 192 `for sale' units within the mauka portion. According to the application, should the requests be approved, the applicant intends to submit plans for plan approval review within one (1) year. There is a discrepancy within the application on the anticipated timing of development where one section indicates that Phase I is anticipated to be complete by 2024 and Phase 11 by 2030, however, another section indicates that only completion of Phase I (maximum 258 units) of the 450 -unit project is expected to be within ten (10) years from the date of approval of the requested amendments. The applicant addressed this discrepancy by indicating in writing that the entire project can be reasonably completed within ten (10) years of the effective date of the amendment, thus the request has changed to a ten (10) -year time extension within which to complete the entire development. Assuming there are no additional cost -related -5- conditions beyond those improvements required by Ordinance 02 131, the current estimated development cost of this project is $170 million in 2022 dollars, including County exactions and fees. 4. Supportive Information: The applicant has submitted the attached in support of the request (Planning Department Exhibit 1— Change of Zone amendment request accepted June 21, 2022.) 5. Landowners: Kona Three LLC. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 6. State Land Use Commission Docket A83-549: On January 26, 1984, the State Land Use Commission (LUC) approved Docket No. A83-549 to reclassify 124.66 acres of land from the State Land Use Agricultural District to the Urban District for then petitioner GAMLON Corporation (see Exhibit A of the Application). This Decision and Order (D&O) was amended on May 10, 1993 to reclassify an additional 49 acres from the State Land Use Agricultural District to the Urban District as a second phase. 7. Change of Zone Ordinance No. 84 23: On May 15, 1984, the County Council approved Change of Zone Ordinance No. 84 23 which rezoned approximately 103.293 acres of land from Unplanned to Single -Family Residential -15,000 square feet (RS -15) and 68.837 acres of land from Unplanned (U) to a Multiple Family Residential -5,000 square feet (RM -5) for then applicant GAMREX, Inc. The RS -15 zoned lands are the site of the Kona Vistas subdivision and the RM -5 Zoned lands are the current project site (see Exhibit B of the Application). 8. Multiple Amendments to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 84 23: Between January 18, 1988 and November 27, 2002, there were seven (7) amendments to the original change of zone ordinance, which were primarily time extensions to facilitate the development of the single- and multiple -family development. 9. Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02 131: On November 27, 2002, the County Council approved the latest amendment to the original change of zone ordinance. This amendment allowed for the plan approval for the first RM increment to be secured within five years, construction to commence within one year thereafter and be completed within three years thereafter (see Exhibit C of the Application). -6- 10. Multiple Single -Family Residential Subdivision Actions: Between May 17, 1990 and March 30, 2021 there were 12 separate subdivision actions to facilitate the development of the Kona Vistas subdivision on the RS -zoned portion of the project. 11. Final Plan Approval: On November 23, 2007, Final Plan Approval (PLA -07-000325) was issued by the Planning Department for the proposed construction of 150 multiple - family residential units on approximately 17 acres of land within a portion of Parcel 016 in satisfaction of Condition I of Ordinance 02 131. Per Condition I, construction should have commenced no later than November 23, 2008 with completion no later than November 23, 2011. By letter dated September 1, 2017, the Planning Department notified the current applicant that this Final Plan Approval was no longer valid since the previous owner was not able to commence construction of the initial phase of the 150 multiple family residential units within the RM -5 zoned area within the required timeframe. 12. Property Acquisition: On December 3, 2015, the current applicant acquired the subject properties. 13. Subdivision No. 18-001855: On May 15, 2019, Subdivision No. 18-001855 was approved to consolidate TMK (3) 7-6-021:017 and TMK (3) 7-6-012:124 resubdivide the property to reduce the size of parcel 017 by 1.675 acres an increase the size of parcel 124 by the same land area. The owners of parcel 124 are not involved in the current amendment request, thus the total land area covered by this amendment covering the two subject parcels is 67.162 acres. 14. Entitlement Work Since Property Acquisition: Since 2017, the applicant has submitted three amendment requests, the first two of which were returned because the Planning Department required additional information and ultimately the applicant was required to conduct an Environmental Assessment for the project (further discussed below). STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 15. State Land Use District: Urban. 16. General Plan LUPAG Map Designation: Urban Expansion & Low Density Urban. 17. County Zoning: Multiple Family Residential -5,000 square feet (RM -5). 18. Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP): The KCDP, was adopted by Ordinance No. 08-131 on September 25, 2008 by the Hawaii County Council and -7- amended by Ordinance No 19-91 on September 18, 2019. The subject properties are situated within the Kona Urban Area (KUA). By letter dated September 1, 2017, the former Planning Director confirmed that the proposed Royal Vistas multiple family housing project is consistent with the subject property's RM -5 zoning and also noted that according to the Official Kona Land Use Map (Figure 4-7) in the KCDP, the western portion of the project site is situated in the Pua`a-Wai`aha Village Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Floating Zone. The former Director confirmed that location of this TOD has not yet become fixed by a master plan and Project District zoning; however, it is likely that the future TOD will be located makai of Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and mauka of Kuakini Highway. Therefore, the former Planning Director determined that the subject properties are not located in the TOD. Furthermore, the project site is not situated within a Concurrency Zone. The Official Transportation Network Map for the Nani Kailua Area (see Figure 7 of the application) designates three minor -collector roadways within the project area to: 1) connect County -owned Leilani Street within the Kona Vistas Subdivision with the County -owned Ho`omama Street within the Pualani Estates Subdivision; 2) connect County -owned Kekuanao`a Place within the Kona Vistas Subdivision with County -owned Paulehia Street within the Pualani Estates Subdivision; and 3) connect the two new roadways with a mauka-makai roadway segment. Finally, given the existing RM Zoning, the proposed project can be developed pursuant to KCDP Policy LU -2.8: Development Outside Transit Oriented Developments (TODs), but within the Kona Urban Area, as a non -Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) project through compliance with KCDP policy requirements for parks, street standards, wastewater, and sensitive resources. 19. Special Management Area (SMA): The subject properties are not situated within the SMA and is located approximately 4,500 feet mauka of the nearest shoreline. 20. HRS Chapter 343: The applicant was required to conduct an environmental assessment (EA) for the project due to the proposed construction of roadway segments across county lands (the Horseshoe and Holualoa Drainageways). By letter dated September 13, 2021, the Hawaii County Planning Department issued a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the proposed 450 -unit Royal Vistas housing project. The final EA is -8- included as Exhibit D of the change of zone amendment application. DESCRIPTION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA 21. Subject Properties: The subject properties consisting of combined 68.837 acres are located along the east (mauka) side of the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway at its junction with Kuakini Highway north of Lako Street. The parcels slope east (mauka) from approximately 360 feet above sea level to approximately 685 feet above sea level. The properties are currently not improved with any structures and are overgrown with vegetation. Two County -owned and managed drainageways are situated within or directly adjacent to the subject properties. The Horseshoe Bend drainageway (identified as TMK: 7-6-021:018) partially bisects the project site in a northeast to southwest direction, while the H61ualoa drainageway (identified as TMK: 7-6-021:019) runs along the entire southern boundary of the project site. 22. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: Adjacent properties directly to the north are zoned Agricultural 5 -acre (A -5a) and are intermittently used for cattle grazing, further north is the Pualani Estates Subdivision, zoned Single -Family Residential -7,500 square feet (RS -7.5). Directly to the east (mauka) is the H61ualoa 1 & 2 Partition Lots subdivision, zoned Residential and Agricultural -0.5 acre (RA -.5a) and consist of residences and small farms. Properties to the south are zoned Single -Family Residential - 15,000 square feet (RS -15) for the Kona Vistas subdivision and Agricultural 5 -acre (A -5a), which is the site of the Calvary Community Church of Kona, permitted by Special Permit No. 642 approved in 1987. Properties to the west (across Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway) are zoned Single -Family Residential -10,000 square feet (RS -10) for the Komohana Kai Subdivision. 23. Flood Zone/Drainage: The Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) shows the project site and proposed development as largely in Flood Zone "X", with a small portion of the project site in the 0.2% annual chance floodplain. The Horseshoe Bend and H61ualoa Drainageways which cross and are adjacent to the project site, are sited in Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) Zone AE. Zone AE is defined as areas inundated by flood having a I% probability of being equaled or exceeded in any given year (base flood) and the floodways are in Zone AEF. These -9- drainageways flow through culverts built under Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and merge at the makai end of the 12 -acre property previously slated for an affordable housing development and feed into a County -owned drainage channel from there. The applicant is processing a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) with the FEMA to further channelize the portion of H61ualoa Drainageway that crosses the 12 -acre site to allow more safe and efficient transfer of these flood waters. The applicant anticipates that a new CLOMR will be needed during the development of Phase I of the project for the Horseshoe Bend drainageway. In response to the amendment application, the Department of Public Works (DPW) outlined a varied history of efforts to provide drainage facilities for the project, with many changes to the approach and final design of the facilities that have yet to be constructed. In response, the applicant references Condition Q of the existing ordinance, which requires the applicant to develop a drainage roaster plan, including final design of the facilities, meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works (DPW). Moreover, construction of the drainage improvements must be consistent with the requirements of the approved master plan and Chapter 27 of the Hawaii County Code as part of the grading permit process and completion of the improvements will be required prior to certificate of occupancy for the project. Thus, ultimately DPW will have final approval authority over the final design and implementation of drainage for the project. 24. Archaeological/Historical Resources: According to SHPD, the project area has been subject to several previous archaeological studies, including a reconnaissance survey (Hammatt and Folk 1983) and two AISs (Hammatt et al. 1984; Hammatt et al. 1992) conducted in TMK: (3) 7-6-021:016 and 017, and a field inspection of the current project area (Escott 2016). The 1984 AIS was conducted for the original 171 -acre project area (which included both the RS and RM zoned lands), except for a five -acre portion in the southeast corner of project area intended to be developed by HPA. The AIS identified 21 archaeological sites and two bulldozed modern planting terraces in the project area, including 11 excavated sites and two burials that were subsequently reinterred outside of the project area. The AIS report recommended no further work at all 21 sites. SHPD did not accept the Hammatt et al. (1984) AIS as it did not meet SHPD standards at the time. -10- No correspondence associated with the Hammatt et al. (1992) project was located by SHPD and as such, it is unknown whether the AIS assessed the archaeological sites for significance, and whether recommendations were made regarding which sites were adequately documented, requiring no further work, and which retained potential for further documentation through mitigation including archaeological monitoring or preservation. Hammatt and Shideler (2007) submitted additional site documentation in the form of a letter to SHPD for five sites, however, site maps and photographs were not provided for all sites. In 2016, SCS conducted an archaeological field inspection of the current project area to relocate the sites identified during the 1992 Hammatt et al. AIS and to assess their current condition and the adequacy of the study documentation. However, the field inspection did not include the completion of new documentation needed to meet minimum AIS standards. By letter dated July 30, 2018, to the Planning Department, SHPD requested a second AIS study of the Hammatt et al. (1992) project area to identify all archaeological historic properties present, and to update previous archaeological documentation to include site plans with site boundaries and areas impacted by bulldozing, photographs of all sites and features, an assessment of their integrity, and site significance. The applicant hired SCS to complete the study, consisting of a pedestrian survey of 76.121 acres of the project area (with the exception of the five acres slated for HPA). Seventeen of the 21 previously identified archaeological sites were located. Two of the previously documented sites relocated by SCS were determined to be natural bedrock outcrops and the two burials that were reinterred off-site in 1993. The four remaining previously documented sites were bulldozed prior to the SCS fieldwork, and the remains of the sites are no longer present on the ground surface. Three previously undocumented sites were also documented, including a portion of the railroad berm, a small coffee shed enclosure, and several ranch walls. A third AIS (Escott and Escott 2018) was conducted in the five -acre southeast corner of Parcel 17. The entire study area was subjected to a pedestrian survey and 22 archaeological sites were recorded, primarily agricultural complexes and terraces -11- associated with pre -Contact era through early post -Contact era to Historic era agriculture. Several Historic era walls and enclosures, a lava tube burial, and a portion of the old railroad berm were also documented in the report. Preservation was recommended for the burial and the railroad berm. SCS submitted a DRAFT Burial Treatment Plan for Burial Site #50-10-57-30593 Located in Holualoa Is' Ahupua `a, North Kona District, Island of Hawai `i, TMK: (3) 7-6-021:017, which was accepted by the Hawaii Island Burial Council on August 15, 2019 with a determination to preserve the burial in place. By letter dated August 19, 2019, SHPD accepted the document and SCS finalized the document as a Burial Site Component of a Preservation Plan, which includes interim preservation buffers and archaeological monitoring, and long term preservation measures including a permanent, 20 -foot preservation buffer from the outside perimeter of the burial portion of the lava tube, an additional 10 -foot, no -build easement outside of the pennanent preservation buffer, and the construction of a permanent, low rock wall with a gate for pedestrian access to be built under the direction of and inspected by a qualified archaeologist. (Planning Department Exhibit 2 — August 19, 2019 Letter from SHPD Accepting the August 2019 Burial Treatment Plan and August 2019 Burial Site Component of a Presrvation Plan for Burial Site #50-10-57-30593 Located in the H61ualoa 1st Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii TMK: (3) 7-6-021:017). A final AIS completed by SCS (Escott and Escott, August 202 1) included a 100% surface survey of the entire 76.121 -acre project site with site recordation, GPS, photography, and subsurface excavation with documentation. A total of 18 sites and one isolated find were identified, including two newly identified sites and a petroglyph, with the remaining sites being previously documented, including pre -Contact to post -Contact enclosures, platforms, mounds, lava tubes, walls, a railroad berm, and complexes. Five previously identified sites were determined no longer present and as stated earlier, two burials were disinterred and reinterred off-site in 1993. All the sites were assessed as significant under HAR §13-284-6 Criterion d. The railroad berm (Site 50-10-37-30592) was also assessed as significant under Criteria a and c and was recommended for preservation. The petroglyph (Site 50-10-37-31254) was also assessed as significant under Criterion e and -12- was recommended for preservation. The former burial site (Site 50-10-37-10012) where the disposition (burial and associated burial crypt and features) was relocated, nevertheless, SHPD recommends that the burial site be flagged for preservation in the form of avoidance and the previous site location will be monitored if construction activities occur near that location. The AIS recommends no further historic preservation work for the remaining sites. By letter dated October 15, 2021, SHPD accepted the AIS, agreeing with the site integrity and significance of all the sites and making a determination of, "Effect, with agreed upon mitigation commitments." SHPD agrees with the preservation of sites 50-10-37-30592 and 50-10-37-31254 and mitigation in the form of archaeological monitoring during initial ground disturbance. Finally, SHPD agrees that the sites recommended for no further work have been adequately documented. Prior to permit issuance, SHPD requests that the following be submitted for review and approval: 1) An archaeological monitoring plan (AMP) for all initial ground disturbing activities; 2) An archaeological preservation plan (PP) for the two sites referenced above; and 3) Written and photographic documentation verifying implementation of interim protection measures for the two sites to be preserved. During the EA process, public comments indicated the possibility of the Holualoa Slide being present within the project area, based on a possible alignment starting mauka of the project area at the Holualoa Inn and traveling makai through the project area. According to the comments, the possible remnant of the slide at the Holualoa Inn, "has rock walls on both sides," which may coincide with parallel walls found within the project area AIS. In response, SCS conducted a thorough investigation of the possibility of an ancient holua slide in the project area. SCS provided a report dated November 29, 2019 to the applicant, addressing the public comments (Planning Department Exhibit 3 — November 10, 2019 Report from SCS, Inc. entitled RE: Parallel Walls Site #50-10- 37-30595,-30601, and -31182 (Features 2 and 3) Wall Type, Function and Age, Located on 76.122 Acres of Land in H61ualoa 1St Auhupua`a, Kailua-Kona, North Kona District, Hawai'i Island [Portions of TMK: (3)7-6-021:016 and 017 (por.)]). SCS reviewed archaeological studies of the Holualoa Inn property as well as studies of -13- other intervening properties and found no evidence of remnants of a slide in the area. Rather, the alignment found was recorded as a historic era road (Site 24211), whose orientation, slope, ground surface materials, width, and rock wall height lining the trail were not indicative of the remains of a h6lua. Furthermore, this roadway alignment does not extend into the project area, with its western terminus at Hualalai Road. While the alignment intersects with trails found on a 1928 map, none of the trail alignments enter the project area, but rather the northern trail terminates at a railroad berm along the eastern boundary of the project area and the southern trail passes south of the project area. None of the archaeological studies conducted by SCS of the project area found evidence of holua features, nor is there any documented oral history, archival documentation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a h61ua course existed within the project area. 25. Cultural Resources: A report entitled, `A Cultural Ifnpact Assessment for a 78.122 -Acre property in Holualoa Ist Ahupua `a, North Kona District, Hal-vai `i Island, Haivai `i [TMK: (3) 7-6-021:016-019] " dated June 2020 was prepared for the applicant by SCS, Inc. and included as Appendix 4 of the FEA. The CIA notes that the region of H61ualoa was developed into a royal center in the late 1600s to early 1700s under the reigns of Keakamahana (reigned 1680-1700) and Keakealamwahine (reigned 1700-1720), with many `ali`i and konohiki residences and numerous religious sites known to have existed here. The majority of the heiau and royal residences were constructed along or near the coast, most notably at Kamoa Point south of the project area. The study further notes that this royal center at H6lualoa was eclipsed in the second half of the 1700s by the royal center in the Kahalu`u and Keauhou region. The project area was also a part of the Kona Field System that extends north at least to Kau ahupua`a and south to H6naunau, west from the coastline and east to the forested slopes of Hualalai. In the post -contact era, the Kona Field System hosted the planting of coffee, sugar, sisal, citrus, and cotton until eventually the land was used for cattle pasture. As part of the CIA, personal interviews were sought to provide ethnographic and oral history of the project area. SCS, Inc. sought consultation with Jordan Kea Calpito, SHPD Burial Sites Specialist; Kamakana Ferreira, OHA Compliance Officer; Nicole Lui, -14- cultural descendant, Sean Naleimaile, SHPD Hawaii Island Archaeologist; Kekoa Nezara, Kona Hawaiian Civic Club President; Shane Nelson, OHA West Hawaii Representative; J. Curtis Tyler III, cultural descendant, and Gregg Kashiwa who served as project property manager for parcels 016 and 017 in the early 1980s. J. Curtis Tyler III, Nicole Lui and Greg Kashiwa did provide information concerning lands of H61ualoa I" Ahupua`a. There were no past or ongoing cultural practices identified with lands of the current project area. Additionally, public notices were placed in the December 2019 issue of the OHA Ka Wal Ola Newspaper. Public notices were also published in the Honolulu Star-Advertiser, and the West Hawaii Today on November 17tH 20th and 21St 2019. There were no responses to the published public notices. The CIA concludes that, "An analysis of the potential effect of the proposed construction of residences on cultural resources, practices or beliefs, its potential to isolate cultural resources, practices or beliefs from their setting, and the potential of the project to introduce elements which may alter the setting in which cultural practices take place is a requirement of the OEQC (Nov. 10, 1997). Based on historical research and responses from the above listed contacts, it is reasonable to conclude that, there would be no traditional cultural practices affected and there would be no direct adverse effect upon cultural practices or beliefs in the broader project area region." 26. Floral/Faunal Resources: The Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) included a September 2017 report by Geometrician Associates, LLC entitled, "Botanical Survey and Vertebrate Fauna Assessment, TMK 3-7-6-21: parcels 16, 17, 18 & 19 (78.324 acres) North Kona District, Island of Hawai `i. " The report, which included a review of earlier studies and an on-site field survey of the subject parcels and the County's drainage facilities, included the following findings: 1) Flora consists of primarily introduced plants, including guinea grass, koa haole, opiuma, monkeypod, kiawe, klu, and several other non-native trees. The understory consists of several non-native grasses, herbs, shrubs, and vines along with a few native plants including `uhaloa and `ilima. In total, 65 plant species were found, five (5) of which were indigenous, and none were endemic. All native plants found are very common throughout the island of Hawai `i and the State, and no rare, threatened, or endangered plant species were present. No tree tobacco, significant -15- for its role as a potential host for the endangered Blackburn's Sphinx moth, was found in the survey area; 2) Fauna included 15, non-native species of birds, the most common of which included the spotted dove, northern cardinal, cattle egret, parakeet, Japanese white - eye, and house finch. While not observed during the field survey, the short -eared owl and Hawaiian hawk may forage in the area. Additionally, some endangered and threatened Hawaiian seabirds (Hawaiian petrels, band-rumped storm petrels, and newels shearwaters may fly over the area between the months of June and October, though there is no suitable nesting habitat for any of these species within the area. The endangered Hawaiian hoary bat is also likely to be present in the area, though not observed during the diurnal survey. The only live mammals seen during the survey were cattle, feral pigs, and small Indian mongooses. It is likely that feral cats, mice, rats, and domestic dogs are occasionally present. The only reptile observed during the survey was the day gecko, with other reptiles including other species of geckos, anole and skinks likely present in the area. None of the preceding have any conservation value. On-line maps found on the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) depicted no critical plant or animal habitat on or near the survey area. Despite the preceding, the report referenced some mitigation measures to address endangered or threatened species that may traverse the area, including outdoor lighting mitigation for endangered and threatened seabirds, guidance on woody vegetation removal during Hoary bat pupping season, and guidance on vegetation removal related to the Blackburn's Sphinx moth. By memo dated August 1, 2022, the State Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW) concurred with the proposed mitigation measures. 27. Public Access: There is no record of a designated public access to the shoreline or mountain areas that traverses the project area. 28. Civil Defense Sirens: Section 25-2-46 (Concurrency Requirements) of the Zoning Code requires the provision of adequate civil defense siren warning coverage as determined by State Civil Defense (HIEMA) across the entire project site for a change of zone or a time extension thereto for projects over 25 or more residential units. There is an existing civil defense siren located at TMK: (3) 7-5-019:028, approximately 2.18 miles northwest (makai) of the subject properties. According to County mapping, the coverage area of this -16- siren covers approximately 2/3rd' of the project area. The applicant has represented that they will coordinate with HIEMA or County Civil Defense and install any additional sirens as may be required for the project to provide adequate coverage. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 29. Access: In the vicinity of the project site, Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway (Route 11) is an undivided, two-lane, State-owned arterial roadway, oriented in the north -south direction with approximately 70 feet of pavement within a 180 -foot right-of-way. The posted speed limit varies from 45 to 55 miles per hour (mph). Approximately 2.4 miles north of the project site, Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway opens to four to five lanes with dedicated left turning and right turning lanes at major intersections. According to the applicant, access to Phase I of the proposed project will be via a new roadway ("Royal Vistas Roadway") which would intersect with Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway, approximately 600 feet north of the intersection with Kuakini Highway and directly to the south of the culvert/headwall that runs under the highway. As represented in Figure 10 of the EA, Royal Vistas Roadway will be designed as a full -movement, channelized, two-way, stop -controlled, intersection. A crosswalk would be provided on the east side of the intersection for pedestrian connectivity to cross Royal Vistas Roadway. There would be a refuge lane for westbound left turns onto Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway to make this turn easier for drivers (see Figure 10 of the FEA for a close-up of the proposed intersection improvements). In addition to the preceding, the applicant proposes constructing the following roadway segments in accordance with Kona CDP requirements: ■ In Phase I, construct that segment of the Leilani Street extension situated within the project site. This segment will stub -out the Leilani Street extension on the southern project site boundary and will not connect it across the private adjoining parcel (TMK 7-6-021:014) owned by the Calvary Community Church of Kona. ■ The applicant initially proposed to extend Kekuanao`a Place northward through the project site from its existing terminus in Kona Vistas subdivision, including the installation of a culvert system across the Holualoa drainageway as part of Phase II of the development, however, as further discussed in Section 30. Traffic -17- below, in response to DPW -Traffic comments on the TIAR and timing of roadway segment construction, the applicant now is proposing to construct and dedicate this roadway segment as part of Phase I and prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy for any dwelling units in the development. ■ In Phase I, construct a mauka-makai roadway connecting both the Leilani Street and Kekuanao`a Place extensions. Despite the connection shown on the KCDP "Official Transportation Network Map for the Nani Kailua Area," none of the roads proposed for the project will connect to Ho`omama Street and Paulehia Street in Pualani Estates due to an intervening privately - owned parcel (TMK 7-6 013:004). Finally, these roadways will be constructed as minor collector roadways meeting County-dedicable standards with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, all of which will be dedicated to the County of Hawaii upon completion. The remainder of the internal roads servicing the multi -family dwelling structures will be designed and built to private driveway standards and will stay in private ownership (see Figure 6 — Conceptual Master Plan for Royal Vistas). According to the Department of Public Works, they have no objection to the proposed amendment to Condition N as it relates to the proposed north/south roadway alignments and clarification of which roadway segments are to be built to dedicable standards (as minor collector roadways) and dedicated to the County. However, DPW has concerns over the proposed, segmented layout of the mauka/makai roadway connecting the highway and the Paulehia /Kekuanao`a Place alignment. Instead to allow for best traffic flow, DPW recommends the mauka/makai alignment to be a continuous, linear thoroughfare like Puapua`anui Road and Lako Street in the vicinity of the project site. In response, the applicant indicated that while they see no significant benefit to a continuous thoroughfare over the proposed segmented layout, they will explore a continuous thoroughfare alignment where practicable given the topographical and drainage constraints of the project site. 30. Traffic: The applicant commissioned SSFM International to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) dated May 2020 as part of the EA process (see Appendix 2 of the FEA). Based on agency and public comments and in accordance with the concurrency section of the Zoning Code, the applicant submitted an updated TIAR dated November -18- 2021 (see Exhibit G of the application). Both reports used the same assumptions, traffic counts, and analyzed the same study intersections near the project area, thus we will focus on the latest TIAR for purposes of this report. The TIAR assumes that Phase I of the Royal Vistas multiple family housing project will be completed by 2024, with all trips generated by the 258 units within this phase entering and exiting at the proposed Royal Vistas roadway and distributed onto the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway (Route 11) via an unsignalized and channelized intersection. The study further assumes that the development of Phase II, consisting of the remaining 192 units, will be completed by 2029 along with the connection of Phase II through Kekuanao`a Place within the Kona Vistas Subdivision to Lako Street. The TIAR includes analysis of 47 turning movements at eight existing intersections on Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway. Five intersections were analyzed north of the project site: 1) Palani Road, 2) Henry Street, 3) Hualalai Road (North), 4) Hualalai Road (South), and 5) Puapua`anui Street, and three intersections were analyzed to the south, 6) Kuakini Highway, 7) Lako Street, 8) Kamehameha III Road. Turning movement counts were recorded at each of the intersections at peak morning (7:OOam to 8:OOam) and afternoon (3:45pm to 4:45pm) traffic hours to determine the existing Level of Service (LOS), and all eight intersections currently operate at acceptable levels (between LOS A and LOS D) in the AM and PM peak hours. Upon the 2024 completion of buildout of Phase I, the TIAR finds that overall, all intersections will operate at an acceptable LOS, but some turn movements at six intersections will deteriorate to an unacceptable LOS (E or F), with or without the project. According to the concurrency section of the Zoning Code (HCC Section 25-2-46 (e)(1)), if the LOS for any transportation facility in the project area is (A) currently worse than the acceptable LOS, or (B) projected to become worse than the acceptable level of service during the five-year period of the TIAR, any rezoning of the property, if approved, shall contain conditions that require mitigation of adverse traffic effects before occupancy of the project is permitted, or that occupancy be delayed until the LOS has reached the acceptable level and is no longer projected to be worse than the acceptable level. As no transportation facility in the project area is currently worse than the -19- acceptable LOS, nor is projected to become worse than the acceptable level of service during the five-year period of the TIAR, no immediate mitigation is required. Upon the 2029 completion of Phase II, the TIAR found that overall, all intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS, however, with the increase in background traffic and traffic generated by the proposed project, the LOS for some movements at seven intersections will further degrade. The TIAR recommends several mid-term mitigation measures, most of which are dependent on the State Department of Transportation (DOT) to implement. However, while the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway/Royal Vistas Roadway is expected to function acceptably through Phase I buildout, the TIAR recommends that before any Phase II residences are occupied, the connection to Kekuanao`a Place is completed so that Royal Vistas Phase II `left out' traffic can access the Lako Street traffic signal. Finally, based on the existing traffic volumes and future projections of Royal Vistas on the surrounding roadways, the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway/Lako Street intersection and some individual movements at other intersections are expected to deteriorate to LOS E or worse in 2039, with or without the project. According to the TIAR, the widening of Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway to 4 -lanes, and the completion of Alii Highway (aka Alii Parkway) is needed to increase the north -south regional capacity. The TIAR notes that the widening of the highway to 4 -lanes between Henry Street and Kamehameha III Road is included in the HDOT Federal -Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District of Hawaii, however, the widening has not yet been programmed on the DOT's Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) through Fiscal Year 2027. In the meantime, the TIAR assesses alternatives and recommends several mid- and long-term mitigation measures to be considered by the County and DOT. DOT commented on the TIAR and is largely supportive of the requested time extension and roadway standard amendments with the recommendation that conditions of approval require the applicant to coordinate with DOT on any mitigation measures, including any pro -rata contribution's that may be required, that a 10 -year development schedule showing the phases, number of units, and associated transportation improvements be completed before occupancy of each phase, and that any state highway improvements -20- required for the development shall be made at no cost to the State and conform to current federal and state design standards. DPW Traffic Division reviewed and provided comments on the TIAR with information on how traffic on the highway impacts county roadway facilities and requested additional information from the applicant on the findings of the study. One of the more germane comments was the recommendation that the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway/Royal Vistas Roadway intersection be limited to right-in/right out movements and the recommendation that the Kekuanao`a Place connection through the Kona Vistas Subdivision to Lako Street needs to occur from the outset of the proposed project and not as a part of the Phase II development. Finally, with the connection to Lako Street, highway widening and significant Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway/Lako Street intersection improvements are necessary. In response to DPW -Traffic's comments, the applicant has represented that they have no objection to connecting its project roadways to Kekuanao`a Place prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for any residential unit within the 450 -unit project, thereby distributing vehicular movements between the channelized Royal Vistas roadway and the signalized Lako Street. 31. Water: According to the applicant, they have secured 450 water units to service the entire project and have kept those water commitments paid and current. In addition, an off-site water meter box was installed in 2018 that will provide the necessary potable water and fire flow to service the project. The Department of Water Supply (DWS) has no objection to the time extension request with the understanding that DWS can only support the current allocation of water. The applicant will be required to submit water system construction plans prepared by a professional engineer for DWS review and approval. Furthermore, the applicant will be required to construct applicable water system improvements designed to deliver water at adequate pressure and volume under peak -flow and fire -flow conditions in accordance with the Water System Standards and the Rules and Regulations of the DWS. DWS further requests that the applicant addresses the non -potable demand of water by minimizing the demand or propose to supply the demand by alternate methods (i.e., reclaimed, or reused water). Finally, DWS indicated that the overall water demand should be reviewed as the water use other than the -21- residential dwelling units will need to be included, which would reduce the number of dwelling units that can be developed as additional water beyond the total number of water units allocated to the subject parcels is not available. 32. Wastewater: The subject properties are not currently served by the County sewer system, however, according to the applicant, and as required by the County Department of Environmental Management -Wastewater Division and the State Department of Health, sewer lines and other necessary wastewater infrastructure shall be extended to accommodate wastewater needs of the entire project. 33. Solid Waste: There are no municipal waste collection services in the County. According to the Final EA, solid waste generated by the development will be hauled by a private contractor on a regular basis and disposed of at a permitted solid waste management facility. 34. Schools: According to the Final EA, the closest public elementary schools are Kahakai and Holualoa Elementary schools, located 1.2 miles west and 1 mile east of the subject parcels respectively. Kealakehe Intermediate, located approximately 3.2 miles north of the subject properties is the nearest intermediate school. Konawaena High and Kealakehe High School are the nearest public high schools, located approximately 7.9 miles south and 2.8 miles north, respectively, of the subject parcels. According to a comment letter received on the Draft EA from the Department of Education (DOE), the proposed project is expected to house approximately 99 DOE students and although the proposed project is located within the West Hawaii School Impact Fee District, the DOE has currently suspended fee collections. The applicant would coordinate with DOE and comply with all applicable DOE requirements at the time of project implementation. 35. Affordable Housing: Conditions of the LUC decision and order and change of zone ordinances require the applicant to offer 10% of the lots or houses and lots to be developed on the subject properties for sale at affordable rates to low -to -moderate income residents of the State of Hawaii as required by State or County housing agencies. According to the application, the applicant initially attempted to satisfy this affordable housing requirement by entering into an agreement with the County Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) to convey approximately 12 acres of land located -22- between Kuakini Highway and Royal Poinciana Drive (identified by TMKs: (3) 7-6-024:025, 112, and 113) to the County or their designated affordable housing developer. Despite these parcels not being a part of the land area covered under the LUC decision and order, the LUC opined in 1989 and again in 1993 that the conveyance of the 12 -acre parcel satisfied the decision and order affordable housing requirement. The 12 acres was purchased at auction by GAMLON Corporation (predecessor to the applicant), and as the land area contains the confluence of the H61ualoa and Horseshoe Bend drainageways, the applicant was required to address drainage issues on the property which included the preparation of an EA and issuance of a FONSI, an SMA Use Permit to do flood improvements within the SMA, and an application for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to allow the flood -zone designated portion of the 12 acres to be channelized and developed. The CLOMR (Case No. 21-09-1757R) was subsequently issued on January 10, 2022. Despite the applicant's efforts, the OHCD recently decided that this proposed 12 -acre affordable housing site was not suitable to meet their goals for affordable housing, prompting the applicant to offer an alternative to satisfy the affordable housing obligations for both the existing 215 -unit Kona Vistas subdivision and the proposed 450 - unit multi -family residential project through the acquisition of 67 affordable housing credits via land exchange for land associated with the creation of a new 100 -unit affordable rental project above Lowe's Home Improvement on land that the applicant will donate to a qualified affordable housing developer. This was memorialized via a new affordable housing agreement between the Applicant and OHCD, executed on January 10, 2022 (see Exhibit D of the application). Despite this agreement, the applicant has yet to acquire the 67 housing credits at the date of this writing. The Planning Department is also concerned that the securing of housing credits in lieu of offering built units on site at affordable rates does not meet the requirements of the LUC decision and order and advised the applicant to either seek further clarification from the LUC on whether this approach would comply with the requirements of the decision and order or to amend the decision and order. Finally, OHCD submitted a letter requesting that a condition be added to require compliance with Hawaii County Code Chapter 11 — Housing. -23- 36. All Other Essential Utilities and Services: Electricity and telephone services are available to the site. Fire, police, and emergency management services are available in this part of North Kona. Police services are located in Kona, about five miles north of the subject parcels and the Kailua-Kona Fire Station is located approximately 3.5 miles northeast of the subject properties. Emergency medical services are provided by the Hawaii County Fire Department and hospital services are available at Kona Community Hospital, approximately 7.5 miles to the south. AGENCIES' COMMENTS 37. Department of Water Supply: (Planning Department Exhibit 4 — August 15, 2022 memo) 38. Department of Public Works -Engineering Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 5 — October 5, 2022 memo) 39. Department of Public Works -Traffic Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 6 — September 28, 2022 memo) 40. Department of Environmental Management (Planning Department Exhibit 7 — July 20, 2022 memo) 41. Fire Department: (Planning Department Exhibit 8 — July 14, 2022 memo) 42. Office of Housing and Community Development: (Planning Department Exhibit 9 — November 30, 2022 letter) 43. State Department of Health: (Planning Department Exhibit 10 — July 13, 2022 memo) 44. State Department of Transportation: (Planning Department Exhibit 11— September 3, 2020 letter and August 17, 2022 letter) 45. Department of Land and Natural Resources — Division of Forestry and Wildlife Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 12 — August 1, 2022 memo) 46. Department of Land and Natural Resources — State Historic Preservation Division: (Planning Department Exhibit 13 — October 15, 2021 letter) AGENCIES - NO COMMENTS OR CONCERNS 47. Police Department and DLNR — Engineering & Land Divisions. -24- AGENCIES & ORGANIZATIONS- NO RESPONSE 48. Department of Parks and Recreation, Office of Housing and Community Development, Kona Traffic Safety Committee, and Kona Vistas Community Association. APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO AGENCIES' COMMENTS 49. The applicant submitted the following in response to agency comments (Planning Department Exhibit 14 — November 15, 2022 letter) PUBLIC COMMENTS 50. Email dated July 18, 2022 from Roberta Durham to Planning Department (Planning Department Exhibit 15). 51. Email dated July 19, 2022 from Douglas Fredebaugh (Planning Department Exhibit 16). 52. Email dated July 31, 2022 from Joel Gimpel (Planning Department Exhibit 17). 53. Email dated August 3, 2022 from Jack Nunberg (Planning Department Exhibit 18). 54. Email dated August 4, 2022 from Marta Finley (Planning Department Exhibit 19). 55. Email dated August 4, 2022 from Mike Jorgensen (Planning Department Exhibit 20). 56. Email dated August 4, 2022 from Janice Kerr (Planning Department Exhibit 21). 57. Email dated August 4, 2022 from Doug Perrine (Planning Department Exhibit 22). 58. Email dated August 4, 2022 from Kathy Winter (Planning Department Exhibit 23). 59. Email dated August 5, 2022 from Sheila Braithwaite (Planning Department Exhibit 24). 60. Email dated August 7, 2022 from John Randerson (Planning Department Exhibit 25). 61. Email dated August 7, 2022 from Claude Thornton (Planning Department Exhibit 26). 62. Email dated August 8, 2022 from John Bennett (Planning Department Exhibit 27). 63. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Diane Blancett-Maddock requesting a deferral of the Planning Commission Hearing on behalf of members of the Kona Vistas HOA (Planning Department Exhibit 28) and Planning Department's Response via email dated August 24, 2022 (Planning Department Exhibit 29). -25- 64. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Sherry Bracken (Planning Department Exhibit 30). 65. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Clyde Hemby (Planning Department Exhibit 31). 66. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Renee Inaba (Planning Department Exhibit 32). 67. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Jim Johnson (Planning Department Exhibit 33). 68. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Diane Logan (Planning Department Exhibit 34). 69. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Mary Hemby (Planning Department Exhibit 35). 70. Email dated August 8, 2022 from John Miki and Bonnie Hildebrandt-Miki (Planning Department Exhibit 36). 71. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Mark Powell (Planning Department Exhibit 37). 72. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Peri Steffenhagen (Planning Department Exhibit 38). 73. Email dated August 8, 2022 from Cheryl Tanguay (Planning Department Exhibit 39). 74. Email dated August 9, 2022 from Art and Lisa Javar (Planning Department Exhibit 40). 75. Letter dated August 9, 2022 from Elizabeth Dunn (Planning Department Exhibit 41). 76. Email dated August 9, 2022 from Diane and Christopher Kim (Planning Department Exhibit 42). 77. Email dated August 9, 2022 from Sandra Leek (Planning Department Exhibit 43). 78. Email dated August 9, 2022 from Mike Park (Planning Department Exhibit 44). APPLICANT'S RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 79. The applicant submitted the following in response to agency comments (Planning Department Exhibit 45 — November 15, 2022 letter). -26- Amendment to Change of Zone ordinance 02 131 Applicant; Kona Three, LLC Requests: Condition I — Time extension to secure Final Plan Approval and Complete Construction of First Increment of R1 -zoned area Condition N—Clarify improvements to subdivision roads Tax Map Keys- (3) 7-6-021:016 and C17 Hckialo,a, forth Kona District Hawai°'i Island Prepared by: Daryrn Arai, Planning ConSLdtant May 2022 REQUESTS FOR TIME EXTENSIONS TO SECURE FINAL PLAN APPROVAL AND COMPLETION OF MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMPONENT OF PROJECT AND TO CLARIFY REQUIRED DEDICABLE ROADWAYS FOR DEVELOPMENT FORMERLY KNOWN AS KONA VISTAS AS SUPPORTED BY CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 02 131 (REZ 470) APPLICANT; K,ONA THREE, LLC (formerly GAMREX, Inc.) PROPOSED PROJECT: ROYAL VISTAS H6LUALOA V and 2"',NORTH ORTH K NA HAWAII TMK° 7-6-021. 016 and 017 I. INTRODUCTION Kana Three, LLC "'Applicant"), is Lhle ov.rner of LtvO (2) properties idenLifiecl by TMKs: 7-6-421 0'_G and C17 ("sL:2 ect pr"operties";, [0i7Fi=7:')g of a total of 68.837 acres situated Vithi,i ri l;-irUcr 17A.6ff jcr(-, projt:rt :-rites thr![ v,f . .Il}1f'c:° to a St�do Lane: Llkt3 District Boundaryzmerdrnen-tothc Urbzn District it IFxhibitA—AES 549''-�hich was then subsequently rezoned later in the s<ime yomii ln-n thr- Sin,gl, F:' -icily Ri?,,idontlal (RS -15) and Multiple Fariiily Residential (RM -5) zonii7„ cistFiLts ;Exhibit B Cart, r_m'e 4- 23) in support of a proposed SOO-unit sirgfe- and rm. tiple. =t- ni y rn,"el r. r_ial development, with the single family rcv.Icortial cor'nponc i tacir7 cc. rw CLtd s ncC Kana Vistas subdivFsion. Over the course of the next 2.3 ,fears or so, the original Applicant, GAM REX, Inc., proceeded with the initial increment of devptopnnent of the 103.3 acres of RS -15 zoned lands into 215 single-family residential units that is now known as Kona Vistas subdivision, which also included the construction of the mauka section of Lako Street that now serves this subdivision. GAMFREX, Inc -,and its subsequent development entity Kona Vistas LLC, was successful in securing from the Hawaii County Council a series of amendments to Vie original zoning (Ordinance 84-23) to provide additional time to complete the vrc Dosed development, the last extension was approved in 2002 (E_xhk tC-Qrdi-7nnc e 02-131)" that granted a tirne extension until November 27, 2007 to Ar c u c Fin,i PLin Approval for the first increment of the muitiple-farnily residential cnir:ponont within thr• RM S 70rrr area with its planned completion no later than Novernber 27, 2011. Upon completion of the last phase of the single Ir w y i(ti,1dcnI MI of Kona Vista subdivision on or around 2007, the next incremert proaosec w s the RIVI coned lands to the north of the existing Kona Vista subdivi ion. `sl& -,,k on th . phase never progressed. Ire Decerrber of 2015, the current Applicant, Kona Three, LLC, acquired the 68.837 acres cumprisin,g the RM -5 zoned lands (Parcels 015 and 017) with the intention of developing a 450 -unit multiple family rental and for sale housing project to be known as "Royal Vistas". In the years since its acquisition of the subject properties, the Appficant has made efforts to satisfy the various procedural and regulatory requirements that would support these requested time extensions to Ordinance 02 131, which includes the preparation of an environmental assessment as well complying with the affordable housing obligations for both the existing Kona Vistas subdivision developed by the original developer, GAM LON Corp., as well as the proposed multiple family project proposed by the current Applicant, Ilona Three LLC. II. APPLICANTS ISE UES A. Time extensions to Condition I of Ordinance 02 131 — effective November 27, 2003 C ondi'Jur I ul, Or linar;ce 02 131 requires that plans for the first increment of the n•.u'tiplc. family residential component of the project be submitted and Final Plan Approve,) E,c.:,rcci ,o 1Mor tl,an five (5) years from the effective date of the ordinance: or Novernbe, 27, 2408, with construction commencing within one (1) year thereafter and complet or of this multiple family residential component no later than three (3) years thereafter, or no later than Noverrbe, 27, 2012. Dodi respcct,,ve conditions within Ordinance 02 131 are recited for -VeLr convenience be -low I) plans for the development within the fi r ', i _c -ement of the RM zoged area shaII be sobrnitted to the Planning 1)t,p iJi—orit and `into' n1,- rn 'p irc.v,aI secured within five years from trio effective date of this ,ixth arnendrnert. Construction shall commence with n one year from the Late of receipt of final plan approval and be completed within three years thereafter-, L!) an initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within the ordinance tray be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1) the non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicants, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence; 2) granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the general plan or zonin-; rade; 3) granting of lhc- i ime r 0oii--In n tip„?l.lr: nul :.r� conl, icy I o I lic o- Ig nal reasons 'cr the of she rhr:nge of zone; 4) the time exte•7s1on granted shall he- for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance {Le.: a condition to be performed within one year may be extended for up to cine additional year); and 21 1'., 5) if the applicant should require tin additional extenslon of time, the Planning Director shall submit th;., applicant's rEquest to the County Council for appropriate action. Further, should any of the conditions not be met or substantpaIIV ccmpsiied witrn i•i a timely fashion, the Director [sic] initiate rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation. The Applicant purchased the suhitect p rope rties in late 2015, 3 years after construction of the fir�L Increment of tiie ML. Llple farrtily residential project was intended to be completcd as originri y aFf:-)rc(d by Condition I of the change of zone ordinance. Regardlt �, it 5iP:nifican1 :-w7r w of pI.Innin , design, regulatory approvals, permitting and constriction have al -earl V bee-) ccne as witnessed by the completion of the 215 -unit Kona ltista suL•cl:0,;icm ind tl^ coi)7 -r Lection of Lako Street as well as in anticipation of the final re IdenLlal :o-nporier-L, Lhe 450 -unit multiple family project to be known as "Royal V .as`. Regrettably, as r.:xp,lainec furthe- below, thc- conce-toe' and diligent efforts of bath the original and current App lifant-; to meet a by [ordinance 02 131, were unsuccessful. As �,LlCh, and pursuant to Corwil`ur° I and Condition U of Ordinance 02 131 and can behalf of Kona Three, LLC, ("Applicant"), we respertfully request an extension 01 Lirrle of ten (10) years rrorn th,!' C I I -OCLI vc date Of Lhis amendment request by -.%,hicl- to cornp:ete .onstruction of the first increment of the 450 -unit multiple family projec-t upc n tl, RIVI-� zzone-d subiec:t properties as originally Set forth in Conal tion 1. B. Amendment to Condition N of Ordinance 02 131 0.011 71nn N, ra s r-r.itc-d i , f.,ll below, obligates the Applicant to provide for dedicable roadways with c.Irfj. gutter and sidewalk improvements within the proposed development, vuhich the Applicant has every intention of providing_ For the sake of anticipating the extent of these dedicable-standard roadways as it affects the overall design of the proposed project, the Applicant is requesting that Condition N be clarified tca provide such dedicable-standard roadways only as tt pertains to its extension of Paulehia and Ho'onnaua Streets within Pualari Estates to the north and Kekuana`oa Place and Leilani Streets within Kona Vistas subdivision to the south, along with an interconnecting road between these two extenspons and to the Queen Ka `ahumanu Highway, all of wfiich will be constructed as minor collector roadways as identified within the Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP) and further defined on the Conceptual Master Plan for Royal Vistas identified as Figure 3 - Conceptual Building Layout in the Final Environmental Assessment dated September 2021_ Regarding that porticn of Condition IN referencpng roadway improvements that C rm,.�, or is divido.d by rl rol•r., liric rigid its ex{E: n,,Ion to the raea ti4t intersectiDn, the ApplrcJnL rerolnriencfs th rL Lh s sec- ion be deleted In its entire?y since Figure 3- Conceptual Building Layout within the iFEA defines the roadway segments that will be constructed with curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements. The requested amendment as shown below will also clarify that the existing section of Kekuana'oa Place with Kona Vistas subdivision can be maintained with its current paved shoulders and swale, which has been expressed as the preference of residents within the Bona Vistas Subdivision. N) the roadways and StuboLrt within the RM zoned area, is shown on "Figure 3 Cpn entual f3r.ildi .Layr;Lrt" in the Final.EnyirrinmPnt _I }45,r,,rrr n Rny. l Vistas Houslri�i Project dated .Septernlber 2021, sn, dl be const) L.0;A �o dedicable stand ird with curbs, gutters, and v,.ith -N-. approval of th(• Dop.=ifirnt,ri1 of Public nrk; L nri ,h ll 1)v dedir.ilod Irs 1hr� Countyof Hawaii L.p,-jn completion.1-AW1;4;-,t-a 1�<<3---9T- r . - _ - r. _ .. _ r:rli r1'�j1:7.r1rrl is kIndf---51 r)rc d, ck-,I�L ,d iriitorla i, hr 7r.krtc-d & .Str,ic k �I t rr.asen for these requests and ofhf7— nss.jr at€ d inforn-otia-r are in the PaDgC� that f01101,1�. Ill, PROGRESS OF DEVELOPMENT Since the approval of both the 5_t3t€ Lind Use? District Boundary timendment and change of Lurie in 1984, the former and cu-ient Appiic,ants have ma ;e significant progress towards completion of the overall single- and multiple f i roily residential projnrt, a demonstrated by its accomplishment of the following. 11-1i1c.C7()114,s; LAA Street ox:tension iSUB 5738 Crr2,:tiuii r.- right Lrf way 1: etwucn Kuakini Highway wic the Kailua-Kear.hatI Middle Rcuc to accommodate initial segment of the propcsr:,d exte-n5ion of Lako Strc-et, approves on May 17, 1990, 2. Kana Vistas Sutrriivision— U r is 'i A ,'SJB G1,1 C) Phase 1 of initial increment of 39 single fam-Ily reAel•i.ial -ut,� c at least 15,00 square feet in size, approved on May 27, 1992. Includr-s the construction rpt t:he initial segment of the extension of La Street frim its intersection wlI;y Knakini }highway and extending mauka to Leilani Street. 3. Kona Vistas Subdivision—.Unit 1-_11 (SUB 6140al Phase 2 of initial increment of 51 single family residertial Bots arca 4 bill:. lots. approved on January 21, 1993- Includes the second s^amr.nt of thr O.xr.rmminn )f Lako Street between Leilani Street and Kinau Street. 4I 4. Kona Vistas Subdivision - Unit 1-C (SUB 61,1li', Phase 3 of initial increment of 20 single family res idertial ots and I buI`t lot (subsequently condornirmir-Iized), approves. ; Ju ,r, 8, 1-JI�17. 5. Kona Vistas Subdivfs±on — Unit 1-D (SIUB b1=10b) Phase 4 ❑f initial increment of 10 single faruily residential lots, approved on December 22 1997, Note that this 5uhdivlsion covers onion of same area as Unit 1-C. 6. Kona Vlst.;i,. Unit 1-E (SUB 6140b) Phase 5 of initial increment of 6 sin -le `amily residential lots, approved on December 22, 1997_ Nato tl, t this portion of same area as Unit I -C_ 7. Kona SLIOCivis on — Uni a -.A ;SJG 7578] Flhase 1 of ir,;:i er-icril ref' ,ir glu f:-irriily widc wi;rl lok, �il)Provecl on September 9, 2002. S. Kona Vistas Subdivision -- Uni= 21-3 (SU3 03-CO0022) Phase 2 of second increment of 39 single family residential lots, approved on July 23. 2013. Includes the third and final segment of the extension of Lako S}re r, extending it mauka from Kinau Street to the adjoining lolani Subdivision. ). 12 -ac -e County Affcjrcd�-❑ e IJDL,sinJ= s to I tx..Ite:,l mak,)' Sir.., of <u ik n Highway across of the suh1c ct pr �p:- lh s pruperty vv-,�s selected as the potential site of an afforctiib e IIUL1°•111s proj.,ct it s:Aisfaction of the affordable hous:rig obligations required by thc: State I rind lJ;c Dirstrict Bouncr,�ry amendmr,,r�t and change of 7ono ordwance. An environniental asses5rtient was p—epared and a FONSI was i�,sLae d in 1996. however, before the site could be deveiooc.,d for of crdable housing, improvements to the Horseshoe Bet�d and Holualoa drainageways were required that would connect with the existing County dra'nageway between Alii Kai and Kamani Tree subdivisions. Gamrex prepared ar)d successfully secured the issuance of SMA Use Permit No. 430 on April 4, 2D03 to allow for these drainageway improvements to occur within the Special Management Area_ Nate that this effort also involved the acquisition of properties by Camrex in the vicinity of Royal Poinciana Drive and Kupuaa Street to accommodate bath the 12 -acre affordable housing site and the mentioned drairl eavk.',':i�%s. 10. Koen 'Vif;7,1 Srinr.ivis nn — Uni- 4 (SUR C5 M12 27) T-wd IncreITIC-It or 26 IOts. e�lc-7 conslii)F, Of a n-ririmL:m of 15,000 square feet, aiprovec on Mzy 8, 2ODS. 51 11. Kona Vistas Subdivision - Unit 3 4SUB 05-0002261 Fourth increment of 20 single family residential lots, approved on May 4, 2006- 12. Plan Approval Application On NDvember 23, 2007, F -ial ?It,°i Approwl. �vos issued by the Planning Department far the proposed construction of 1�)G niultpe-family residential units ran approximately 17 acres c- ILrnd vu thin a po.-tion of Parcel 016 in satisfaction of Condition I of Ordinanco (:-? 1.� 1. Pr- C ninditi;m I, construction should have commenced no later than Nove-nber 23, 2009 with completion no later than November 23, 2012_ By Irt-er do -cd September 1; 2017, the Planning department notified the Applicant i 1,M [hi, Final Flan Approval is no longer valid since the original applican`.. GAMREX Irc xas not able to commence construction of the initial phase of the 151 --mltiple, f�i )Ay re,;identiial units within the RM -5 zoned area within the two-year peg ioc ending; Noven,oef 23, 2009, thereby necessitating this request for a 10 -year time extension to complete the proposed multiple -family residential project. I � Konti Vi4'r]� SUnr'.ivi,_:)n — Uni•: a (SUR 20 ,SCJ'97:1 Subdivided large remn-mL Jai_ •7 JniL 4 F'Lo 3 single family residential lots, approved on January 25, 2021. 14. ]bona Vistas Subdivision — Unit 4 ISUB 20-0019881 Subdivided large rernnant Int in Unit 4 into 2 single family residential lots, approved on March 30, 2421• Upon purchase of the subject properties at the end of 2015, Kana Three LLC has placed a significant financial commitment and many years of consultation, negotiation, environmental review, preliminary design work and regulatory compliance in order to be able to support this request for an extension of tune lay which to complete the project. These efforts included the following: 1. Drainage Irnprovernents within Holualoa 134mi.eway In coordination with the Department of PuN c'Norks, �Ilan-)ing Uepartment 7:)c; the Office of the C❑r Cil-atior3 cun-pk,tea iml rovewent; wi-L yin :ind cd.-Jcent to the HoIualoa Dr.-inaprew,-jy in acroroance with ti=e reconimon Jot iuns of ti e Department of Public VVDrks. 2. Dedication of roadways within Kon -p Vista subdivision In coordination with the Department of Public Works and the Office of the Corperation Counsel, performed all necessary road work and completed dedication of three (3) remaining roadway lots within the adjacent Kona Vistas subdivision, namely Kekuana'oa Place, Liholiho Place and Kamamalu Place. I 12 -acre County AlfcIrcf�:bie Housing site makai of Kuakini Highway With the issuarcc of SMA. Use Permit No. 430 on April 4, 2003 to allow for improvements to ,he Hor,eshoe Bend and Holualoa drainage ays witf7in this proposed affuf; able housing site, the Applicant retained the services of a hydrological vnginec r W prepare and submit a ConditianaI Letterof Map Rte;vision ("CLOM WI) application to the Federal Emergency Ma nagement Agency (FEM.!\) in 2018. The CLOMR was issued 1-10-22 as Case No. 21 On, -17578, so t1 -e riocesSary drainage irnptovernents can now be hunt and thr, Ifr;-,I)r I V I lion (4ouk-Ic"pe(i for affordable housing. However, cles:,ILe L h e A;3 pfic3n,'-'s efIv,L , L1,e County no longer wishes to proceed with the dev Iopment o the 12 -acre oropr rLy f or affordable housing in ifavoroftheafforoable rioutsingagree ment ri. ri.,,Ie 1 I i , r - h e h(,Iow.. 4_ Final Environmental Assessment aic Finr-ink n= No Sil-r fi rrnt lmpI :4r (FONSI) By letter dated September 13, 2021, the IIawai'i CounLy'k-it,irg Deparrn-peat issued a FONSI for the proposed 450 -unit Royal 'Vistas--iousinp project that accort ponies and supports these arnendrnen. "etfue t to Ordind rice 02 131 as Exhibi_ D. }I,e Final Environmental Assessment ir,cluder, all upditcd traffic impact.,nal+ysis -r port, biological survey, cultural impac.r ;r� ;rfii?nt, arch o lng:cal inven!nry and preservation plan. Also included w Lhin L'Iis process were consults Liens wi'hi ,irea residents, specifically from the adjoining Kona Vistas subdivlsion. Work or, the environmental assessments and its related studies began in 2018 unti its acceptance by the Planning Department in See—.amber 2021, covering more than 3 years of studies and project design revisions based or) agencies and public review and comments upon the draft environrnental assessment. 5. Environmental flora study commissioned by Applicant and performed on all of Parcel 16; 17; the County -owned 18 & 19, plias the 12 -acre site. 6. Environmental faunal study commissioned by Applicant and performed on all of Parcel 16, 17; the County -owned 18 &. 19, plus the 12 -acre site. 7. Affordr-jblc HCOsinF, Agreement Applicant r,oria hree, LL.: and the County of Hawaii entered into an agreement on January 10, 2(,2:? to satisfy thr, affordable housing obligatic)ns {Condition J of Ordinance 02 13 1 '1 loi in(( df�v(,,(.-Pmc--n1 c-;: ,h:r entire 173.66 acres of land encumbered by Fruth the State Land Use Ui rrict Boundary amendment :grid change of pane rardinance zipproved in 1984_ As allcwrf l y Sect wi I. 5(a',(7) of Chapter 11 �vr�ii' Co. i r, I y Code regarcing Affoiclblr I n'. i.,ir,o;, rApplicant acquirers 67 excess housing c-ec'ts via an exchange ior- land for n newv ?rojert to satisfy the afford -IhIr hc_Is '1,, "-A) I! ns for bL,-h thc. 2'17) s. ic; r, MrnIIy residential units within Llie existi°w 1<01a `v'istas sulsdi risia i as viell as )e 453 rnultiple family housing units v'thin the proposed Rova 1:' Stas project. 71 As such, the Applicant is requesting an extension of time of ten (10) years to secure Final Flan Approval for the first increment of the proposed 450 -unit multiple family housing project as well as to complete its construction as originally intended by Condition I of Ordinance 02 131. And with approval of the requested amendment to Condition U of Ordinance 02 131 to provide clarity and certainty regarding thy, extent of required County- dedicable roadways to be constructed within the propr)srr: Jtwelopment, the overall design can be facilitated so that plans for engineering arid curstruction can commence promptly after the requested arnendrnerits are approv(-� by the Hawai `i County Council- 1V- NATURE OF REQUEST GAMREX, Inc.jKuna ' ISLds, LLC (.-re uripMal IancL,,vrrers and Petitioners) were c ,.vrecl by a Jap a• -l -based deve o:)ment g!oup, whose n•,ajr rity a":arner Zlid Presl dent 4petirtiet1cied ;he K:)-lli 'v .0 proJec: developrrr Brit urAi' F i p-,:ssing sonne years ago. The development group eventually lost interest as well as its abil -y to continue to develop the project after 37 years of progress as demonstrated above. In December of 2015, Kona Vistas LLC sold their remaining, land holdings to tvvr' Hawai'li-based development entities: KV3, LLC and Iona Three LLC. These remaining landholdings that were transferred included about thirtee=n lots in Unit- 3 anc Unit 4 of the Kona Vistas subdivision together with three road ay Inas and sc)me ren, .nanit lots in Unit 4 and Unit 1 transferred to KV3 LLC; and the multi-famoy {RM -51 zoned subject properties totaling about 68.837 acres identified as TMKs: 7-6-21:01.6 & 017 were transferred to Dona Three LLC. Also included in the transfer were about 12 acres located makai of Kuakini HiL;-w,iciV and nnaukd of Ruyal Poirnciana Drive (TMK's 3/7-6-24:25; 112 & 113). These 12 3cf'es contain the confluence of the Holualoa and Horseshoe Bend drainageways, and were u iginally War -red by the County to fulfill the affordable housing requirements of botn the c xistir.-' Trona Vista subdivision and the proposed Royal Vistas multiple family resident?al projects. KV3, aftc-r 111ilding some drainage improvennents adjacent to County -owned Halualaa ;; worked with the Department of Public Warks (L)PW) and the Minnirt; D�pnrtrneri (CPD) along 3,v th County of Hawaii Corporation Counsel {"Corp nlrn.�rl", ic) dr�diraio iho I rr niii aing rna;t%vay-, that had not been dedicated: c,-irplet'n the ruaclvlay dedications in 2019. -1-,e c-irrent Applicant, Kona Three LLC, has retained a hydrological engin er and other advisors ar�d is working on a new drainage study and flood zone analysis 'r ml -, p i1 or' or -ioving fr),v� and with the planning and i. L' i-lial.r•r' �r'1 C)FiFrt� R . r�,n:�c: I�:i cl, 4: `rich is rripacted by two floodways: the Horses•iue be•id and I lulualoa 'NI drainageways, The Applicant anticipates that a new CLOMR will be needed during the development of Phase I of the Project for the Horseshoe Bend drainageway. The Applicant also carne to agreement with Hawaii Preparatory Academy's 5 -acre interest in the multi -family zoned lands siU.ated within the extreme southeastern corner of Parcel 017. Hawaii Preparatory Academy decided they no longer wished to build a new school in Kona, and Kona Thrc _, L_C w_3s abbe to purchase their undivided interest in the 5 -act; ;_ A new AIS was 1hc,r p ,,p7red ori the 5 -acres as this Land was not previo,,isly included iri !-,le original AIS. This r viceiit 815 found a previously unknown hist -or c. hurial site uncr i -ground in a lava tuh� v,,it-iin this included Sucre area_ The Applir,mi lh+.'.n a Burial Trv.,-I rw-71 Plein which has been approved by the Sl WD and the i lawai i Islardd Burial Council. III acid cion, the Applicant was instructed tc prepare a new AIS for the remaining Gr aces of RM -5 zoned lands within the subjec. properties due to the age of the original AIS re;au, r. Tk s new AIS has been completed incl tiippf u --,,ed by SHPD and made a part of thr: 2021 P-wironmental assessment report. —1-e Appl[C�int � iS cDrAi acted :viLh a IOCEJ€ consLrucLion firm, under approvals iss..irF!d by =7c Dep ,rtrrnent of Wati r Supply, and subsequently installed in 2018 an off- site r mcte' lox thE1L w i I I prcwldc fire flovv and potable Water Lo tl^c proposed 450 - unit molt ole family residential project- Final€V, a` the request of the County, the Applicant subw tied ai, apl:7litiat-on f,-)- CLOMR ,-)CLOMR for Vic 12 acres located makai of Kuakini Highway that was i; an affordable housing site, with the CLOMR being issued on January 10, 2U22 Cts}e No. 21-09-17578. As demonstrated above, much "soft work" has been undertaken by the Applicant after its purchase of the remaining land assets from the original landowner in 2015, in order to update and align the various studies and premus obli _;aticris of the original landowner in order to be in a position to make this requ^st for additional time in which to complete the last remaining major residential develc)--inert component that was envisioned by both the State Land Use Commission an-, the HLwumii`i Cu-jr-ty Council when it originally approved the State Land Use boundary iir,r-ndrr.r-�r,t and cliango of zone in 1994. The Applicant foLind itself in a difficult ,position where it could not responsibly approach the Hawaii County Council for additional time in which to complete the final residential component within the RM -5 zoned Sands without first addressing the many project -related supporting elements that will inform decision -makers in making the proper decision to support the approval of the time extension as it will be consistent with the original reasons for approving the land use entitlements back in 1984 while conforming to current land use policies and adequately addressing project -related impacts in a responsible manner. V. PROJECT LOCATION The subject properties, consisting of combined 68.537 acres and identified by TMK: 7-6-021:016 and 017, is located along the east (rnauka) side of the Queen Ka `ahumanu Highway at its junction with Kuakini Highway in the vicinity of Lako Street. The subject properties are situated between some vacant ranch land and Pualani Estates subdivision to the north and Kona Vistas Subdivision and a church to the south, in the ahupua`a of H61ualoa 11 and 211, North Kona, Hawaii (Figure 1 -Location Map and Figure 2 — VicinitV Map). The current General Plan, State Land Use District and zoning district boundaries relative to the subject properties are reflected on Figure 3 — LUPAG Map, Figure 4 — StLrle L-11 rid Use and Figure 5—Zoning. Ili. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Proposed Multiple Family Residential Housing Component The ApplLcant proposes to construct "Royal Vistas" as a 450 -unit mufti -family residential housing project with both rentals and For Sale product to be developed in {lusters of two- and three-story buildings throughout the 68.837 -acres that comprises tooth Parcels 016 and 017. A conceptual drawing of the layout of the buildings is shown below as Figure 6— Conceptual Master Ilan for Royal Vistas, Rov,�l Vistas will he cnmprisc d (-)= multiple family residential units "For Rent" and Ff i S61 -e-, 'ir.af dii ',i" utiuri of these units may be adjusted during final design ano perri, tti lg, the Appiica,lt anticipates that the project will consist of: • 174 "For Rent" units consisting of: to 122 Rwo- bed room/two-bath wilts 5',' tiTrc�e-bcdroom/two-bath units plus a resident rnanager's unit • P,II s.init; %,within two "Y7nry buildings situated within the moko+ portion of the 68.837-ar-re project s`te. • 27 "IFor i tir1t.�, c:or1si5kir) e 14 (2, a e d i o :) n /t ^. u- b 7 L. rr 1 is o 137thre hath unit; p Lis resldr.nt 1-iiinlIp!-r's unit. 0 All ulIilt, i%r° I -i 10 1v.,,) Stor :7L.1lrC hriee.Story buiidings, 5-vith the two-story buildings doling foL.ir L., nits (,::ch al -A the three-story buildings being six units each. Parking wo,i d consist of a mix of covered and open spaces for residents and P Aes:s. 101P-,MgC To address housing sl,ort,�k.e�, iii K{ar ,i, r.l°e Kari,: ''or•m,mnity Development Plan (CDP) identifies Objective HSG -A; Build Marr, .-nits, and Policy HSG -4.2; Workforce Housing. The workforce gap group (up to 1?{ : of ti--edian income} includes the part of the population that earns too much to gUaiify fur Jfordable f•ousing programs, yet too little to buy or rent decent housing close to their .obs. The Project would build units that offer a variety of housing types for both the rental and buyer segments of the mid- market which includes the workforce group. Although the Project is not specifically a workforce project, it would provide a housing option for the workforce gap group. The Project would be developed in two or more phases, with Phase I having a maximum of 258 units to be constructed on no more ahln 42 acres within the makai part'ran of the project site, and Phase Il having the ba ,t nr -e of 192 units within the mauka portion. Phase f would include all the "For Ebert" rir7it; and same "For Sale" units. Both "For Dent" and "Fur Sale" units would target local renLe• s and buyers in the "mid- market" price paints. These are residents who earn too rnud-. to qualify for "affordable housing" but not enough .o b0V the expensive single-far•ii •y 1 -cries located nearby. Pht7.5�,� 1 is :�xl�t�c,r•:-i I�? I]r� rr�rriE31r3117c.1 b� 7f}�7r" ��r•ti l'h:�s.rII i; r��E:���c1�r�4'f to hx� completed by 2029, akhoigh prL+(:es; iJw; of these t irre'ldrileriL lec;4aejL vfi Push its co—rpletion to the Full of 2030_ There mould be tvvo Comrr.iritV Crntc�r-a, e.ich of which includQs a neightsorhood pr;rk: one far the "For Pent" units and one for the "For Sale,, ur)i s• Each community center will have a pool and facilities for -ise oy the resicants. Prono� d F;narlw The proposed roadway system within Royal Vistas will assist in implementing the roadway netw,-?—k with --i this project area as defined by the "Official Transportation Network Map -Nadi Kddua Area" within the K€ ria Cornrnunity Development Plan (KCDP), as part of the County's plan to expand the read grsd to help alieviate traffic and provide safer driving conditions (see Figure 7-ICC:DP Official Transportation Network Map -Mani Kailva Area). These KCDP-defined roadway segments as it affects the proposed project include: * to provide the opportunity in the long-term to connect County -owned Leilani Street (in the Kona Vistas project) to County -owned Ho'ornarna Street (in the Pualani Estates project); • to provide the opportunity in the long-term to connect County -owned Kekuana'oa Place (in the Kana Vistas project) to County -awned Paulehia street (in the Pualani Estates project); and to connect these new roads to each other within the Project area. Kona Three, LLC is required to build and dedicate these roads by Ordinance. Nlwf� �c.i`ii.. V. the proposed Royal Vista& project would construct the following rr,iror collector ri),.idt.°t^ay i regments as shown in FiVure 6—Conceptual Master Plan for Bova l ;i i.sta :. * Inr>I�u�e .corp -.rust Royal Vistas roadway as a direct, fully channeIized entrance from hle Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway. * In Ph;a:zc constrtict that segment of the Leilani Street extension situated 5.v thin th-e project site. This segment will stub -cut the Leilani Street extnr:;ion on tl~e sm.3them project site boundary and will not connect it across the private adjoining parcel (TMK 7-6-021:014) owned by the Calvary Community Church of Kona. + In Phase II, extend Kekuana`oa Place northward through the project: site from its existing terminus in Kona V[stas subdivision. + Construct a rrkauka-makai roadway connecting bath the Lellani Street and Kek,t,Ana'oa Place extensions. • None of the roads proposed for the project will connect to Ho'ornarna Street and Paulehia Street in Pualani Estates due to an intervening privately -owned parcel (TMK 7-6-013.004). These roadways will be constructed to as minor collector roadways meeting County-dedicable standards with curh.ti, glut-:ers, and r• di,.w2lks, all of which will be dedicated to the County of H vti i' `i upor° c um.,)I tion. Proposed Drainage Improvements The alignrn :;nts of most of the Horseshnre Bond {TFAK: 7-6 021:018) arta Holualna JMK; 7-b-021:019} drainageways are LOLI! uv-. nec aiid rnk jnaged by the County of Havwai'i Department of QL:�.` c Works M:�Vv) as draina-t^ways_ A portion of thc Hor- eOs,hoe Be -i(' r' t Iru ,eyv��y 51 Net -'Iowti frrr,n 011 Coi.vity-owrii d c.ftc.:h at P ire -el 1 down to the ex .atir•g culvert sy _ter _ U. i�d(Y QLle� 'n I::i `Lalr.t i�717r�:a Hi;hur�iy cit th e northwest carr}cr of Parcel 16. As vhov.n or Fig�,arc 2 Vicirijy Map, Hor.c sroc Dcncl drainageway partially bisects the project site irk a r1ortneast to southwest dice tion, while the Holulaloa drairageway runs along the entire southern boundary caf the project site. Phase II of tni:: pikjpo�c,d pi 1 will incl -de- Iho H­,kz lla*ion of a crrlvr O system across the holualoa dr.i nu{ e,,vjy to extenc: Ke-wLmD—oU S.reek, which will be gated off and used for emergency accc,.ss only ur til Dhas;o II i5 compltnteo. Phase II will add utilities and roadway irr Prnv ,i icn-.5 v l -•i: h •4wo ild I1ic-ii he t,edicated to the County in compliance with both Ordinu tce 02 131 and _I•e ,RCDP ' Official Transportation Map." 12 1 1} :k L 4 The mauka-Se(.t°nn of the Horseshoe Berid dra na_,evvay, consisting of approximately 3 ages that runs between the subject that collectively make up the 68.837 - acre project site, will be imoroved a--ic iartia ly realigned to maintain its separation from the hoivalua drainageway, aio nE with infrastructure for channelizing a portion of the drainageway to accommodate road and utility crossings associateif with the construction of the two north -south ming collector roadway alignments through the project site as defined by the KCDP "Official Transportation Map. The makai portion of the Horseshoe Bernd drainageway will be channelized where it is primarily sheet flow and moved closer to th,� ro-thern boundary of tl- project site to make room for thr-- nlr, nncd roirvi.--y inte-r�t,r-ion )I 'Jiw,n Kw.-v)r.rni irLi Highway at the location to be approved by `he Sla-le Caepartn•,--nt of Trz:-i;po-ta`ion Highways i ivisien_ Aside from t) c~ De partmc•-it cr--'uhIi- 'bkicr-k-s an p i-ocel d r:in�i76r. improvements, utilities, and r)adwLiys, the A.pt,lic�� "iL is ric.L p i c.pr)P ,irig Lo corsLru,�L L911y additional drainage struetl-. es or' improvements wlthi-7 these -aunty-Dv neo drainageways. Utilities and Services Electrical and sewer service would be extended from nearby public grid terminus and water commitments have already been purchased .and secured for the Project. The project site is situated within the Kona Urban Area between Kona Vest: zmd Pualani Estates subdivisions and is in close proximity to major roadways, recreational opportunities, and essential services, including grocery and wholesale stores, ernployment, hospital/dinics, public transit, schools, financial institutions, government agencies/services, and the airport. VII. PROJECT TIMETABLE AIWA COST Should the requests be approved, the Applicant intends to submit pians for plan approval review within one (1) year. Anticipated completion of the first increment of the 450 -unit Royal Vistas project is expected within ten (10) years from the date of approval of the requested amendments to Ordinance 02 131. Assuming there are no additional cost -re- sited conditions beyond those improvements required by Ordinance aZ 1.31, the c irrpnt estimated development cost of this project is $170 million in 2022 dollars. This i-icludes County exactions and fees. 1313':reg hali** Mwhoka am= no OWNSMIll Figure 1—Location Map 141 '—T —7 former ti 5 t'n ie Ok Ii Aft I Xl� E3 Figure 2 - Vicinity Map is I , Ld Lj X .. .... .... I �7 RURAL 1A. Z:g N11 e D lu OEN I T 161 Figure 3 - LUPAG Map URBAN URBAN w. URBAN RURAL A URBAN Figure 4 — State Land Use AGRICULTURAL CN -20 A -}a RS -10 RA A I -j Figure 5 — Zoning m Z :� ^ ^� �� e k ` � ) ��> w | | � �� Figure 6 — Conceptual Master Plar for Royal Vistas } \ ■gfwa {/» �� j iF Z :� ^ ^� �� e k ` � ) ��> w | | � �� Figure 6 — Conceptual Master Plar for Royal Vistas y / l rill � . ,'+� ti f ' 4�•, �1 * wo M tG W. I A F M �vh N• y� pro6,QVa#Rrrra rv.,^ .Aeruay'Rr000tedTraMrlLlno' ,IGF I I M rear;"r r-rnar.r =: v cord ry r.,.i 1F, FrnnrK -ii in, - lor. mftr 1 1":: Ylr F'nlh-k (L"13F')' FOD .Ira Trrwlyll�,Ir�,� r 'r� Fbcp}dnl� i cnscr ° =Ptmn Llrtuirk.AMA' i ® Pad QR,,al TLAw1 TON' FsaM i' PM -2w L Y S.. PROJECT SITE �, e,`" •' �, the r,t =iEure 7 -(CD ' 31fic`zII Transmaor-atior Network Neap -Mani Kailua Area (L%, th p,ojert �i-r high ighted) VIII. [ORDINANCE 02 131 CONDITIONS AND STATUS OF ITS COMPLIANCE Rezoning time extensions require compliance with applicable prevailing codes, particularly the concurrency provision of the Zoning Code. Further, project's compliance with the conditions of the rezoning ordinance also needs to be discussed. As such, this section addresses those requirements. Change -of Zone Ordinance 02.132. (A) the zoning for the property shall he effective only after- (1) there ,are assurances satisfactory to the Departments of later Supply and Punning, upon consultation with the State Department of Health, and the Division of Water and Land Development of the State Department of Land and Natural Resourrc�s, that a water source ct sufficient quality and quao-Jity has been establisl•ec: v ithin two years from t~ie ef=ective date of this ordinance; provided that a maximum one- year extr n�,ion r(:) .I,(, 1vvo-year uric: lirrril rimy hu �,r(�d h;y Ih,- Plarinin7 ,,, Director vJth rea.5orable and sufficient justi-ic.ation; and {?) an agreenic-r-it, accompanied b,-- .i r7 ,�:7lir 7l)ri slimly ire hr.,nd o, .)I ht -cc rac•1,.�Ih ' ;rr..ari1 , ':; executed with the Depart•77:-r7t of Water Su:jpIy for the actual develc7prrienl of o proven water source and its %v,�to r<;7smission and distribLiCon sys-r:nJ G%,'i-hin one year from the official dare of corr:;l -,ince with condition A, (i); provldcd that a ore--vbar extension to the one-year time limit may be granted by the Flarni��,, D rec-o—.vith -easor~able and sufficient justification; or (3) the Departmert of Supply iss.ies a %nater commitment for the prcpr)sed develop rn,�n_; Ir Tho A.opiff r ! h!is secored andfully paid the required facilities char-gr,,rt o,, Jor 450 water Limts [hut ,mill support the proposed 450 multiple farnily residenijal unit within the Royol Vistas project. In 2038, on off-site Gomer meter box was installed that will provide the necessary potable water and fire flaw to service this project. (5) no subdivision or development of any portion of the land shall occur unless and until conditlon A has been complied with; As mentioned above, the Appficant hors fully paid for the necessary water units to support the proposed project in satisfaction of the requirements of Condition A. 20 1 tr'j thl� f'I; r,£_� DIre(:tor shall be mandated to initiate acti(`}Fi for `I --e re,)eaI of 0'i� r rear ins � i' conditions JA or B have not been complied withl • As boY, Conditions A ai)d B were deemed sotried by t?e P1ur?rtrrrg i)Jre.:tor, the Dire-'( nor oras r?PVOr _ COMPOUPC? M .70ii ir,tv CM racrr:'r, N, filprrf . r"t7 PS "Ls rnd J?!�1-� !rJrllrag [�rq'rrtcrar[:���� 2.s�. ;r,`rrs rs,f".rrt?ar'r supported Lry t17�� r�7[.rrry ti&bs;(_,quent amendments to tars ori ir:'ar;c c• that was approved b C.)) .fn ty CC)cJ noil to (7 flow fn rrdr ir);r7r,r-�i t 0 irr Which to complete the 0FOpose cl project, the most re r: f'rrt beiii y Grciir)once 02 1312 the petitioner, its assigtis or successors, shall be responsible for complying with all conditions of approval; w Til(' 1)ovi1!"1:"I1' i.Jr.iC7iY'lwA! Ow", J!; f l!IIlYF!'Iir?(j f(I.`Pf)fJI, i"Y1 [`i.if� f1��%'•b'ril! jr![' conditions pf aj:.pro,,oi, cilrnj a with its oss'rrr 7.y Cir".SLI�C['. .iClS, (E) the zoning for the 49+ acres des gnited by tl- - 5 -Late Land Lfse Commission as its second zoning increment shall not become. eff(2ct ve until that land is certified by that c€ammissiort to be within tre Urban Distr'ct; + 8'y its 0 'C i<.ic r7 omi Onor rlr7[ SCf Mey 10, ! 99-3, Ow Sir, P Ond Use Commission certif e;, U?ot �he second zoning increment of 49+ acres is within the State Land Use Urban District, (F) the R5 zoned area shall be developed in two increments. The first ircr^me,.-It shall consist of a maximum of 59.5± cont'guous acres, and the second. the remaining area. The effective date of zoning for the secf)A increment be. after development has occurred in the first increrric nt, ;7,s d-n—minr c: € -v tho Planning Director. "Development" means the applicant ha , corr,jleted The or - site and off-site improvements within the first incre-)ert of me RS Toned 7re<I and has dedicated the roadway to the County; This condition hos been satisfied with the completion of all phases associated with the RS -15 zoned portions of the project area now known as Kona Vistas .SAJbdlvision, with thr- fast phase being completed in 2006. + As Cor) Xtior, T hoj been � oiisfied, the Applicant has no obfectian to the deietion of this ccn tion should it be recommended by the Nanning Directnr. (G1 vias. n plans for the first increrrmem of the RS zoned area shall he submitted, wit mi LMC' year from the effective date of the zoning, Final subdivision approval h7r.l t» secured within two years from the effective date of this amendment; This condition he i beer? satisfied with the submitral to the Nanning i'lep rrtment of )gond Vistas Svbdivision—llnit 1-A (SUB 6140), consisting of tlae iniriral increment of 39 single fGmily residential liars, which secured filial subdivision approval on May 27, 199.2. This incr'emrrrit also includes the constructio.,j Lmf the initiol of the extension of Loko Street from its intersection with Kuakino Higi, v, cyf and extending mobko to ± eilarr( Street, As Condition G lags 'be f,ppfir;ant has no objer:tiorr to the deletion of this ccndc tion should it be reccrnmended by til E° Planning Director. (H) the RM Zoned area shall be. developed in two increments. w hie :'irst rcre?we't shall consist of a maximum of 42 acres of the Multiple Family Residertial znred land and the second increment, the remaining area. The effective date of zoning for the second increment shall be after the applicant has completed the on-site and off-site improvements of the first increment of the RM zoned area and has dedicated the improvements to the County; IP The .4pp ronl !Mill romply with thi ; rr nd'7!ie-m, r ov? )?Blur! 1ho 4.SC.' r.im Ro-v l Vistas project in two increments, cis ci 4cus5ed tri Semon lel Lei ±his report. (1) plans for the development within the first increment of the RM zoned area shall be submitter) to the, Planning Department and final plan approval secured witl-in five years from the effective date of this sixth amendment. Construction shall commence within one year from the date of receipt of final plan approval .and he completed within three years thereafter; The Applicant is requesting 6n amendment to Condition i that will allow for the su bmittai of plans and F= r;oi 1'inn Approval far the first increment of the Rm-zoned area secured within fi ✓e fs,� years fro the effected date of the amended ordinance with compie� Toro ref the first increment of the 450 -unit project within five (5) (rears thereafter. (JJ should the Council adapt a Unified Impact fees Ordinance setting forth criteria for the imposition of r,xactinn5 or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall 7,e credited towards the requirements of the Unified Impact Pees Ordinance; + The Apphr.oii, rar:,+cr�mw+c°dges this condition and will comply upon the adoption of ca Unified Impact r ees ore incince. 2213':me-� (K) housing opportunities for Hawaii residents shall be provided in accordance with the condition imposed by the State Land Use Commission. The number of units and manner in which they are to be provided shall meet with the approval of the Hawaii County Housing Agency; Attempts by the Applicant, ir) coordination with the Office of Housing and Community Development tOHCDJ, to satisfy this affordable housing requirement ifiirir ilyi 17e9an with an Agroe ment, along with seven (7) subsegaent tiniendrr enfs, regarding thte° conv, ,yance of arproximotely 12 acres of ,ond located between Kuokini Hicghi.voy a.qd Royr7l PGa ncianq Drive and zone,! RS -10 to the County or their designated Offordobre housing developer. These 12 acres were purchased at the direction of the, County, alc�rara Olith thll MLD( h t,,e Applicont to oddress some drainage issues in the tlrecr, �,t t !e r eilJ. ,t yr f C)H"L), the Applicont prepared a?nd thea submitted art applicatio for ia,lditionol Letter ef 10,ap revision ("CLOMR") to the Federal Emergency fl.lum,;ya•rijefr t Agei� ,. y f ..FE,,?A 'j, to dila W rhL l ((,ori -,,erre designated portion of the 12 acres to be charirrt lized ur ci dove lopt-=d. Tri+, CLOMR (Case No. 21-09-17578) wos sabsequen0vl -ss.- rcd ur) 10, 2022. Despite the Applicant's efforts, the OHCD recently decided that this proposed 12 -acre affordable housing site was not suitable to tweet their goals for affordobie housing, prompting the Applicant to offer as alternative to satisfy the affordable housing obligo6on5far both the r-xi4tin , 215 -unit Kona Vistas subdivision and the proposed 450 -Unit multi family re-Aentivl project through the arqut 5ition of 67 affordable housing credits vim land exchange- for kind associated with the creation of n new 100 -unit affordable rental pr -o ec: above Lowes on land that the , ripikont will donate to a qualified of fordobie housing developer. This rnosr rocont Affordable housing Agreemr—r, artoched as Exhibit D -Affordable llousmiq , ,L:,ement, between the Applicont and OH(" D vvac execfjred on lano.�oryr .10, 2022 in satisfoction of Condition K of 07 41inut,c'e 02 1-:3 1. (L) imprnvrrr~,w § to th4� lntor�^ctlons with, Koiakini Highway and the Kuakini Hip `,vwr:y Cxten4icri shall be constructed meeting with the approval of the State D€ p.irtmc,rt n` T•-anspr,,rtiTion 1-11;ghk^Mays Division. The intersection irnp-,everr'eitts shall be constwcieci with the development of the first increment of the RS or RM zoned areas, whichever occurs first; • TWN condition wos satisfied with the completion of intersection improvements along the Kuakini Highway at its intersection with the mauka extension of Loko Street that serves all cif h,., existing Kana Vistas subdivision. • As Condition i hos been satisfied ich the completion of the intersection crlonrl Kookin i P,iq,r ?rh s soo,rr �,(.t-v !-eferred t,) :rs 'Q,:iren C]I'Pt1:?IL7fli! HJihwcvvJ cl 1i5 ]( 'fSEC'ilClrl vv Ila L.iic) St;eef, � e Applicant has 23I no objectOn to the deletion r.'by the l-J'owai'1 County Council. (M) no direct access shall be provided for the lots within the R5 zoned area from the rnauka-makai collector road; • The development of the exostrng single family res?dentml Jots rrrithi.r? the existing Kona Vistas subdivision adheres to rhis cordtion by re,strfrtinq my direct access onto Lako Street, the mcuka-makai coy ?nectar rord. • As Condition M has been satisfied with the completion of Korea Vistas sa,ib&visforr, the Applicant has no objection to the delenon of this condition should it be recommended by the Manning Director. (N) the roadways and stubout within the RM zoned area shall be constructed to dedicable standards with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks meeting with the approval of the department of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County of Hawaii upon completion. Where a roadway crosses a zone line or if a zone line should divide a roadway, the curbs, gutters, and sidewalks shall be provided for the entire right-Qf-way-arid-shall continue to the nearest intersection in order to avoid tele5ccaping and to provide consistent irrrp'c,v,,rr ent; As ,Dr-s!-ofed in .Sertion P-3 t,f this-rpDrt, th(, Araplrcrnt is requesting that Condition N Le cmr,?f, ed to pro vfde� �cich dedicoble-5toado d roadways only as it pertains to fts PxtE,ns19r, of Pau leh,r: no.4 Ho 'omomc Streets within Puolan+ Estoteys to v)e north ai;c! R'ekuana'oc: P.'O(e M1 LOar i Streets within Kona Vistas subdivision to the south, a?rare I;v?th ari in rerco t, n e c tin 9 roan' between these two extensions or)d to R r i i t o 11, all of which v,,hl! hf, r,oa';tnicted cis minor ccIle ctor roudways as identified within the Koac Ccr,i ri 1 unf"'y Development Plon (RCDP) and farther defined on the Cor,:f-pt� fr, l PO st(r Flan for Royal Vistas identified os Figure 3-Concegtun) Build it;r Lth F?,ol Environmento Assessment doter! September 2022. (0) at a minimum, roadways and stubarrt5 wvithin the RS zoned area shall be provided with paved shoulders and paved swales meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Warks and shall be ded.ca-,ed two -,I,e County of Hawaii upon completion; The de V€-iopmer?t of the e'xis[.r"1g sir Ll1ref7'?' iv :'SE'S'+ iler'rtic i Jilts vJrthif7 the existing Kona 05ta5 subs7",°'v'Sioo ad]CIEs to t"r..s con'diticm :7y prov:'�Ymgj payed shoulder°.s andswoles along G11 in terlor s u b ci.? v (s io o ,00dtvc?yy i o roomer meeting with the approval of the, f?epartr�lerlt c;l;'I+:�?+c '/forks, as well as the dedication of all such roads to the Coy,, xs i� of ,,i wrii 'i. 2413':re-� * As Condition 0 hnc leen satisfied with the completion of !Cerny Vi.Sf subdivision and dedi47otion of all interior subdivision roads, tree Ap;:;icart ,dos /10 ob e'c-:inn M the of this condition should it be rear-ominradod by Lhe Fljf nij;:o g Uirr-,c-tor-, (P) the method of sewage disposal shall rneet with the approval of the appropriate governmental agencies; +� The proposed Royal Vistas project wihr comply with this condition through the exterisiOn of and connection with the existing County Sewer systerP that currently services all of Puolari E.stote.s ,pub:}ivr.54,,n located to the north of the protect site. (0'1 �i u air,age r*J4,vkFr pla,i ,;iall be submitted to the Department of Public Warks for review amd tJ.2prov al pr c-•` to issuance of any subdivision or plan approvals_ The plan shall mc:lwle. as a r -minimum, hydrological and hydraulic calculations for all components cf the drainage system, a construction timetable for all elements of the system, and an analysis of downstream impacts. Further, mitigating measures as approved by the Department of Public Works shall be taken to eliminate any dawnstrparn impacts; ■ This condition hos been ua 6fied as it pertains to the RS -15 zoned lands that has beery fully developed as Konri'Jistcrs subdivision, which included the preparation and opprovai of a rlrcrinuge ,waster plan bythe Oepartment of Public Works and the cof31Ph,tiara of tO r ear.,;j ed drainage improvernents, * A neve drainage mosterpicr; that will provide forappropriate roitirdoting measures to etiminote any downstreum impact that may be directly ccused by the proposed 68.837 -arra Royal Vistas project site, wit/ be prepared and ,S)ihm;Jlr d to the Departmr rnl of Pahlir Works for review and approval should ilii- requested time extension request be opproved. (R) a irtensive archaeological survey shall be conducted for the entire property and a report shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to issuance of any Subdivision or plan approvals; * An archJa77e'�yolog vco� inventory survey (A;,S,I vv,a5 cc ndLicr 'd iJr,�, 1984 for the orlprr� i SJR `acre r7raject e� Ce" t fv�r 1 J-a'cr r7 [}r Li !f� theSa�fiheostern co rn e r a rig in a i + y ir;tc°raord tri l) (' d0L'e"o1)r(ll)y t?ae-ri'ftro f'rc pC"rotory Academy, AS r'egoes[t"d by the Stole M6'Lor'rC i)fosfon, anew crchoeclogicaI sl.+r vV y Lo riif'YJI+f M' C, 'I cr'fho7r nIr" qcr, lil.srorir rri7L3er'ties present in the PrC%jc'c ,' .irrr' (afici firl r;J)1iC�rf'' {} rl1 . l7fr"�;Orit i7ff'�if ('fJ�f7f 1:''C1l documentation to inclueie srte;3!cns fur eocra srte with silt' batrnct_yrre.� yard areas itrrr')cicN, a ;7Y I)Hcio7)n(;, n)°Intcgi-goh-s of call sates erred tr,oror'r'.s, an assessme1rJt uJi tht!"'. rrJreC2riIW, c"? d Sir�' SfC1JJr',Jh-C?frce F,vere perjorlrrc'o, TNI, -se 251 11 ::' , add tiorml survF~y repui t4 liar both the prevf!jr> y �'xc:,'uded S -acre site and the remainder of the lxrulect site including the County -awned drainag ways were completed in 2018 rind 2020, respectively, and included within the 2021 fi,yul envirorime atal for the Royal Vistas project, (5) should any unanticipated archaeological sites be found during land preparation activities, work shall immediately stop and the Planning Department notified. Work shall not resume in the affected area until clearance is given by the Planning Department; The Applicant acknowledges arrd vvlil c.mply wiTh, this condiriom Tl,e Applicant TSU notes tJ1cot it ;s no t L1wore [],{ c7!1 -J `ii-,ot7vL-f-te! t5;� �� isth at were encL]unter'(?(J doiiliq tl-'O t '4L'�i]l;"77C?r1 of Nil: f'xif ting ko"?a visto's'Subdivisio!". (T) prior to the Final ,Approval of the second incrr.-mont, the I-)pplicant, its successors of assigns shall pay for any additional real prjpErty tare,:, owed for the new residential assessed value of the subject property which previously taxed at the agricultural rate; and The Applicant understands that Gumrex Carporotion, devvir)pmif=ct predecessor in interest, complied with this condition many year w r.,go. The Applicant believes this condition is no longer relevant os the rernainin.(.i iarl are assessed rind toyed at RS and RM zoning valuations. Thr'refn-r, the, Applicant has no abjection to the deletion of this condition 5ttr.!iw' r'r be recommended by the Planning Dorecter, (U) an initial extension of time for the performance of conditions w%tnin the ordinance may be granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances: 1) the non-performance is the result of conditions that could have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the applicants, successors or assigns, and that are not the result of their fault or negligence, 2) granting sof the time extension would not be contrary to the general plan or zoning code; 3) granting of the tirne extension would not be contrary to the original reasons far the granting of the change of zone; 4) the time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to I.rcy pc;rforrnod within one year may be extended for up to one adcit ural year), ar.d 5) if the applicant should recliArc: ir- -iddi,innal ext,.�nsion of Time, the Planning Director shall submit 1 he request to the C )w)ty Council for appropriate action. FL. Cher, should any of the conditions not be met or substantially complied v4i-) in a timely fashion, the Director initiate rezoning of the area to its original or rr v e appropriate designation. 261P-,Mgc • Tr)o A.np rrm r� on additional tern (1O) years to complete the first ,le, Fment of the propo-sed ; iltople family residential project wirhirt the RM -5 zencd prrpp3 tr7.5 r.-5 rpr-loin--d hv C,,)ndirion J of Ordinance 02 131. VII. JUSTIFICATION OF REQUEST Condi for U of the Ordinance 02 131 fExhibit C -Ordinance 02-1311 cutlined three (3) circurnstarr c ; rind( -,r which the Planning -) rector could cnr)sk-'er an initial Fine extension reque5'a_ hese circurrstance� . presr:rmib y also apply -o 6r1 eater' I _sig tc. lie considered by the Hawa_i'i County Council arca -e ,.%yard Plarm'r)- ton)n-ds!;ion, e,r th VIC. recommendations or the Planning Director, As suc-). these circumsTar res a,ic: thein justification follow. A. The non -prerforrrmarice is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseers or are beyond the control of the oppiicant, its successors or assigns, and that erre not the result of their fault or negligence. As noted in Sectlens 11, II and Ilii of �f'is report, 4.por` @cquir -7r; th=_- sul)ject propc,,Lies at the end of 01:5, the Applicant took dmmedi�:te steps to idc ess the va--ictus conditions and associated requirements imposed upon the c,t^vrlopment that included. 1. working with the OHCID to satisfy the affordable housing obligations for both the existing 215 -unit Kona Vistas subdivision as well as for the proposed 450 -unit Royal Vistas multiple family residential project, that included the abandollrnent of many years of effort by the Applicant to provide a 12 -acre affordable housing site just makai of the project site, ?. wor`cing vAt� the County and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) reg.irdirg the management, design and improvements to both the Horseshoe Bend and Holualoa drainageways that borders and bisects the 68 -$37 -acre project site, 3. updating the archaeological, cultural impact, biological, drainage and traffic impact studies that wotAid inform the development of an environmental assessment for the Royal Vistas project, 4. prepared a final environmental assessnlCnt ar41 sLcu' c a FONSI for the Royal Vistas project (Exhibit D-Roya' Vist 5 Housing Project F=A-=01x1S ) due to anticipated improverrientr to thd,sr dr rina0evjrlyr th,�- eirrr by the County, which alone took over 3 yea i _, ;.o complete. ar,d 5. worked' with the State, County an,-, jurrouriding cummur ity ,o adr.iress trie proposed roadway systern that will address ;: iticip:3—cd tiI-rffic vol.irn_r, '-;r-d movernents generated by the propo--wd Rcqi : Vic,a,, project,. hila r -.c nf{rnr ng to the roadway connectivity requirements of the Kona CDP. 27 1 As presented within this report, both the original and current Applica°its have made significant progress towards the completion of the single and multiplc, fslmily residential project over the course of past 37 years, with the co -npletion of the 215 - unit Kona Vistas subdivision in 2006 and the ct'anst-t,ction of the exte-lsion of Lir <0 Street that serves bath this subdivision as well as t��C adjoining Iclaui suic vision. The current Applicant, Kona Three. LLC, has spent MLr,.h of it., time and rP.sar.,ces since its purchase of the subject properties at the end ref 2015 to perform -ext-naive studies, planning, permitting and design work that still neces ary +o prcc.crcd v,ith the construction of the 45Q -unit multiple -family res,,aential comporent to be called Royal Vistas_ Part of this effort has been towards satisfying its affordable housing obligations, including those affordable housing obligations of than loo elle L� fl iciwner and applicant. Please nate that this time period also included the economic struggles associated with the Great Recession that: began at the end of 2007 and extender through mid - 2009, and the accompanying burst of the "housing babble" and the .subprime mortgage crisis that has taken years for both industries to recover. Therefore, the Applicant's inability to corrplete the multkple-family residential project within the RM -5 zoned portion of the overall 171- acre project area encumbered by Ordinance 02 131 are the result of conditions that co4ld not have been foreseen or are beyond the control of the Applicant and are not the result of their fault or negligence. B. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or Zoning Cade. I- ;11nI1141 hr'. nr)tI,:d t}i.;t ir,,c, tl,k ;i - E- vv. ; rezoned in 1984, there have been no UI��n e5 W the Ccarrrrt'y Gerle-r1 I'• ori. wl, r -1 designates most of the project site as IU,h.-in Expansion with a section of L,)w Density Urban along the makai portion frunting the Queer) Ka`ahumar.~i I,i: liway, as shown on Figure 3-LUPAG Map. Where the land use regulatory environment has changed is with the adaption of the Kana Camrryunity Development Plan (KCDP), which became effective an September 10, 2009 (Ordinance No. 08 116) and was not considered during the course of review of this rezoning action by the PAnning Department, Planning Commission and Hawai `i County Council due to the filing of the change of zone request in early 1984. SLibsequentto these -,rpprovals, however, the County C)..ir;cil approved a slate of interim amendments to the CDP on September 18, 2019 L•l-�It err'phasized the MP as providing L f-amework e- guidance policies towards future development within the l�Jr-rr-rll 1{Clri,i cii:.frit 1, iI,wr Ili in a serifs, ,3' wm't'j , (' rl' ii tirru. IIS developmerl in spec-fic k)cations rather Lhan pi orll,-)l [IF; rejsorable jppic}ticl,es ,c 2911':re-� such development that in the end, accomplishes the very intent of what the CDP was attempting to achieve in the first place. Regardless, the Applicant offers the following discussion that demonstrates consistency of its time extension and roadway condition amendment requests with the KCDP: Consistency with the General Plan LUPAG map of Urban Expansion and Low Density Urban. The LUPAG map identifies the subject properties and its immediately adjacent area as "Orban Expansion Area" and "Low Density Urban". "Urban Expansion Area" allows for a mix of high density, medium density, low density, industrial, industrial -commercial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may be desirable, but where tFie specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have riot yet been determined. "Low Density Urban" allows for residential: with ancillary community and public uses, and neighborhood and ccriven ience-type commercial uses with an overall residential density of up to six units per acre. The existing RM -5 car ng of the subject properties and the proposed 450 -Unit Royal Vistas mull .ale family residential project if allowed to proceed, will establish a land irse pattern c.onsistent with the bath the urban expansion and low density by the General Plan as well as with the residential neighborhoods that characterize this part of North Kona along the Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway. Speaking practically, the RM -5 zoning of the subject properties is appropriate given the design constraints of both the Horseshoe Bend and HO11- laa r.rainage ways that borders and bisects the 68.837 -ache project site. Placing re, dential units within multiple family residential structures allows for better s ting, opportunities while reducing the overall extent of land altering activities typically associated with single family residential lots. • Consistency with the General PI in poli: s. policies. arcl :tc:ndares relati�,-P to the land use and housing elernents_ The approved RNI-5 zoning; and the proposec. cevelcpment of I -e 450 -writ RoyraI Vistas mta lipIc` 1-irn1ly hour ung p oject, would alsn lay, r.C2 -is1.0rlt w1(1) Uw.: goals, policies, zrd st indLirds of the Housing and Lanc: L.,L Lle-iier:ts of the General Plan, .3 : r 5:.' ;s :. Mermined in 1984 with the app -ova w:f the zoning by the Hauwai'i Co,jr-t•r (.nLjncil'. The proposed project will inr c,l<>4 I ho ov<-,r: ll housing stock ;3clj,7c_;nt to established residential commun ties along, witn appropriate infrastructure that both support and facilitate the housing a,-dI transportation needs fear this particular area. 2913':re-� More specifically to the Housing elernent, the more pertinent goals and policies fallow; Housing Goals • Attain a diversity of socio-economic horsing mix throughout the drfferen r parts of the County, + Maintain a housing supply which allows a variety of choice. + Develop beirerploces to live in Hawaii County by r✓renting viable coni r uniti-s with decent housing and suitable fiving environments for our + )n?prove and me main the quality and affordability of the existing h,.),, rig ib;ck, + seek sufficient production of new offordable rental ancI fee -simple ho,sing in the County in a variety of sizes to satisfactorily accommodate the creeds and desires of families and individuals. Pofkies • increase rental opportunities and choices in terms of quality, cast, amenity, style and size of housing, especially for lave and moderate income households. • Appropriate infrastructure such as water, wastewater, and access are available or will be constructed by the Appkint to support the proposed 454 -unit multiple family housing project. As noted earlier, County water has already been pain for and is available for the project; the project will connect to the County's sewer s,,stern; and access to =h8 site and adjoining residential communities will eventually ae enhanced as two north -south minor collector alignments within the pru)jec. site, as identified within the KCDP, will be constructed, leaving relator-ly =rnall undeveloped segments between the project site and Pualirni E Antes to the north and Kona Vistas subdivision to the south. Within the proIect site, a new fully -channelized access point at Queen Kaahurnanu Highway w+vil, oe constructed to provide primary access to Phase I, with aro eventual connection of Phase 11 with Kekuana`aa Street within Kana Vistas subdivision to provide access too Laky Street. 301P-,ogc Kona Community Development Plate The Kona Community Development Plan ("KCDP") became effective on September 10, 2008 (Ordinance No. 08 115) and was not considered during the course of review of this rezoning action by the Planning Department, the Plann nn Commission and Hawaii County Council due to the filing of the request in 1984 Subsegeient to thc,{r� approvals, however, tf,e County Council approved a slato of interim arrendn'It- .5 to the KCDP on Septem',aer 18, 2019 that emphasized the KC --91' a:, o c,Fic1 rg a framework of guidance policies towards future development within I h�, Nrwl h rryna district rather than r, 4 r'r, of narld£ates that :)( 1 ually hindered develor-inert in spec fic locations rather than promot.nf reasorable approaches to such development treat will s�itisfxi sonic, of the guioiri p--inc nlc.,; of thy, VDP to, • Provide connectivity and transportation choices, • Provide housing choices; • Provide infrastructure and essential facilities cone,.rant +sMh i;ro dth; and to • Promote effective governance - Regardless, the Applicant offers the following discussion that derncanstrates consistency of its time extension and roadway condition amendment requests with the KCDP. 7")e Subject properties are situated vvlthtn the Kona Jrban Area ("KUA") but is not x�.rithin any Transit Oriented Development {TDD) area as shown or) Figure 7 - KCDP 01fI: ;iI T-r:iivorti:il. on Netwnrk Map- Nani KailLia A,,(,A• Furthermore, the SUbject 13r•:>pert e- sue nc: sii_rFated within a Concurrency Lane. These findings were confirmed and ac.cr.pt^d I)y thc-. Planning Department as the accepting authority for the Final Envir(,nr,At'n AY,(-,inunt - Royal Vistas Housing Project dated September 2021. The subject properties with their current RM -5 zoning, as well as this request for a tirne exterrsicio to complete the prDposed multiple family housing project that has been a part of a much larger residential project covering more than 171 acres and underway f +r ,mare than 37 years, should hr fUrictionally dassified as "Infill" pursuant to Policy LU -2.8 that provides guidelhies for rezoning actions and time extensions for properties outside of a TDD area but within the KIJA. The guidelines and their relationship to the subject site/request are: a. Consistency with the fUPAG map. The project site's existing RIM -5 zoning, and its request for an extension of time to complete the proposed 450 -unlit multiple family housing project, wi I co-itinue to fall within the area designated for Urban Expansion i,)d Density Urbana rases. 3111'.,cC b. infill. The project site is designated Urban cin the State Land Use neap, The subject property is situated adjacent to the north of the established 215 -unit Kona Vis -,as subdivision, which is part of the ,original land use entitlements issued iri 1381 that supported the residential development of this part of North Kona. Just One lot ,away to the north is Pualani Estates, a subdivision of more than 3bO homes. lolani subdivision and other smaller subdivisions lie immediately to the east (mauka) of the proposed Royal Vistas project site, As such, this area satisfies the concept of "infill" by linking together the established residential communities adjacent to the north, south and east of the subject properties. This can be no better demonstrated than the proposed extension of Kekuana-oa Place within Kana Vistas through the Project site as well as the construction of the Leilani Street alignment, both of which will help to facilitate* the interconnection of roadways wiFhin Pualani Estates to the north and Kona Vistas subdivision to the sou Eh, which clearly justifies the existing RM -5 zoning of the suhject property, and its continued development through the approval of the requested gone extensions as "infill". c. Greenfields Rezoning. This is not applicable, i -,s by virtop of the previous RM -5 zoning action prior to the adoption Of the Kona CDP as well as the comments noted in "b" above, the subject site should not trigger a need to amend the KCDP. By its letter dated September 1, 2017, the Planning Director confirmed that the propcseo Royal vistas multip e Family housing project is consistent with the subject property's RM i f ming. The Planning Director also waited that according to the Of Iii ial Kon-, l �: rr l.Js Map (Figure 4-7) in the KCDP, t 7r* westerri porl.Or of the project site i�, s.tuated un the Pua'a-Wai`aha Village i r0n5it Oriented development (T OD) Floti :ig Zona. The Director canfirmec' that loca-hon of t-iis TCDD h' -s not yet becorno 11riw l h,• a master p;r�n rw l ;7rr; 1 district zonlrig, hog vc vel, ik iw:ilkcy that the future —OD will be located n,akti Of Queen Ka`ahumanu I Iic'iway and mauka of Kuakini High�vay, Therefore, the Pl,.nning-)irector determined thzL he sub,eck properties are not :acaw� in the T D. The requested amendments to Ordinance 02. 131, in continued of the proposed 450 -unit Royal Vistas multiple family housing project, will be r eve lopr,r. in accordance with Policy LU -2.8(1)(h) of the KCDP, which indicates the prujec:t may cje developed in accordance with the existing zoning, subject to the followinfa requirements - 32111 -,r g � equirements: 3211':re-� Policy LU -2,8; Development Outside Transit -Oriented Developments (TODS), lout within the Kona Urban Area. Development outside the TGDs, but within the Kona UA, may occur as follows: 1. Existing Zoning a. TND Overlay. Any project greater than 20 acres on land zaried Single-family residential (RS), Multiple residential (RM), Residential -Commercial Mixed Use (RCX), Geri -r,rl Commercial (CG), Village Commercial (CV), or Neighborhoad Cornmer'_id (CN), shall be permitted to develop as a neighborhood TND fallowin thi procedures for a PUB and the Village Design Guidelines. b. Non -TND Protects. Any proiect may be developed in accordance with the existing zoning, subject to the following requirements: L Parks (see Policy PUB -6.2.) ii. Affordable I ICUSing. Resale restrictions on affordable units built in campliarrtie °.relit HCC Chapter 11 (see Policy !-ISG-5.2). iii. Street Standards_ Connectivity standards (see Policy TRAN-2.1), street standards (see Policy IRAN -3.1), and traffic calming standards (see Policy TRAM -3.7). iv. Wasfew.ter. P•'iority sewer area (see Policy PUB -4.4). v. Serisitive Rcsou-cCs• Survey of potential sensitive resources {see Policy ENV -1.5). Apel+cant s r e r, A. cc,nfFr.mecd by the Plonnmg Director by its letter doted Septemboo 1. ,�17 f 7, t? �r car r.t nsr-rl Rnyc7f �f,stas rrac�ltipde frm�iy housrrag prr�ject muy he dev�-;oiled os o oof?- rNL) ,P!-uJect its occordonce with its existing zoning, subject to the requirements of Policy LU -2.5, which the Applicant discusses in further oetail below. Policy PUB. -6 2: Act yc-_Recrr:1-.ti,,)n Dpportrinit es. A range of recreational oppurtunmes shuulrl be Prov rigid tri ercGurage physical activity and interaction among toddIc s, yoAh: teens, e:d.al.s, t-,nd cniors, including, without limitation the following: (a) Regional p irl. hi -in wurn 50 acr,,;1 N. -w r­�.,ional park at Kealakehe as shown an thr, PuNic. Facilities Pari tc, Include. pl iyfields, multi-purpose (b) Kang Crtir Ar_I:litori-im or Perform ng Arts Cr.nter_ Facility to provide a venue form.ajor co,clainim%,i1 !�ocl,_., c:..,ltural, anti performing arts opportunities. (c) district park (10-3O acres)—Upgrade the Old Airport Park to enhance the playfields, swirrymIng pool, multi-purpose building, courts (hasketball, tennis, volleyball), tot lots, fitness area, pet area, and skateboard area; locate a district park to service South Kona to include playfields, multi-purpose use building (e.g., (:t,rnmonit,y/seriiol-t'ntcr, tiy117) aero a tat lot. 331P-,rgc (d) Corrfiiuwty parks (4-8 acres) —Acorn muni,y pc -irk should be located 2 miles apart wvrthin the Urban Area to include, at a mir-krum, playfields and a restroom, as designatpd in the Public Facilities Plan to provide adequate playfields for youth leagues; multkpurpose use of school playgrounds should be candidates for these types of parks, (e) Neighborhood parks (up to 4 acres) - A neighborhood park (including community gardens, community centers, packet parks, and pet parks) should be located Y;. mile apart [for] subdivisiaris within the urban Area. Subdividers shall provide for private maintenance or pay a fee pursuant to FICC Chapter S when required to provide neighborhood parks_ Applicant's response: The project site is situated within the Kona Orbarn Areor, which contoins a number of regional, district and community reereationol facilities that ore able to provide for the recreational needs of residents within the proposeci pn2jecr_ Such existing recreational facilities within the Kaiivo-!Coria Qreu inc-1 de. Ac..,ivc l rc..rPo nnol ucUilies: • Old Karya Airport !nark complex, • Kekoankoloni Gym -Pork complex • Corr mrini[y pork Ot Pualarri Estates Beach, Park facilities • Wci 'cha (Honls) Becch Park • Kcrholu 'u Beach Peak • Magic Sands (La 'c7ioa) Reach ,park • PQhoehoe Beach Park Comi)ing Sites ■ Kohrrriaiki Beach Park Tw6 neighborhood parks, each containing a swimming pool, will be included o_s hart of rhe two community renters that will be provided for the residents of this proposed community. �ralicyHSC,-S.? Privately. Construc.t.ed Affordable Units. For pr vote projects subject LO affordable housing requirements, the Kora I-lousrnp, Nora Profit or other non- profit shall have a first right of refusal to 1MX of the required affordable units. Al! affordable units shall remain affordable for 40 year3. No restic�ions rray apply after 40 years Lased on the rationale that newer homes will replace these older homes in the affordable housing stock. During the resale-restricter period, the level of restriction shall meet the following minimum requ=.remews: 3413':reg • 1st 20 years: The affordable units shall have a minimum 20 -year controlled appreciation restriction {cost of improvements plus appreciation based aro the Honolulu Consumer Price Index, ■ After 20 years: The owner may sell the property at market value with a shared appreciation with the County or Kona H,nusin_-, Non Profit at 50%; ■ Right of First Refusal: After 20 -years, the Kona Housing Non -Profit shall have the right of first refusal to purchase the unit,- Owner-occupancy: nit;Owner-occupancy: During the resale -restricted period, affordable units shall remain yawner occupied or rented out by the owner at an affordable rate as certified by the County real property tax division pursuant to the affordable rent provisions in HCC Chapter 19. Applicant's respoise, The Appiicar?t has acquirod 67 crprfrts vicr orr exchange for land associated with the crE°erb'on :i)f a ,,a W 10(3-LMit affordable rental project obove Lowes on land that the Ap;�,ricuot t•+j; l oonore to a qualified affordable housing developer. This most recent uffcrr-rdvba e hou5i?'y Agreement, attochedas Exhibit D -Affordable Housirrg Agreement Applicant ora' OHCO was executed on Jantow-.r 10, .:?022 in sofisfor i i`nr) o! Condition K of Or'dinonce 02 131 and Poky 1 i5G-5.2. Policy TRAN-2,1; Connect vi:y S`andards. Co,7rec-tivity refers ro the directress of links and the density of connections -ht-,t make, u.-) ';he trnr,s :ortatior network. Within the Kona Urban Area (UAB rew dt?velopment shall contr :)nte t;D this interconnected transportation network of streets, pedestrian, and hiiyele access that work to disperse traffic and connect and integrate nE_�•v do-v,,1C)pr11Ont "vith th e existing fabric of the community. Proposals for new develufj° ierit cr redeve €y;Jrrlelit within Kona`s UA should meet the following connectivity stl-i-i di,J: : 2. Connection to Adjoining Development. The road system fur r,ev,, development shall contribute to the local transportation network- To supplement HCC Section 23-40, at a minimum, new subd visicir•s shall incorporate and continue all collector streets, and selected local streets to adjoining property. If a portion of the stub -nut is not improves, the current developer shall improve the stub -out portion, where practicable. Connection to adjoining properties may not be required if seriously constrained by topography or other physical hindrances, or in cases where through travel cannot occur because the property is bounded by development with private sIt(.,ots I]r(-,viousIyaIlowed. Ara�ra?i :crrr'.s r"f7s 7c7r7Sr': The Applicant wilf satisfy the requl;roe )a ants of Policy TRAM ?. v q 0) construction of alignments within the project ,hot will provide for ti7e rr; tL,r-e cGl71 ectiv ty between the proposed Royal Vistas multiple i cmily lrrar�:,io of("J, 'r r rind 1 h t'.xiti`iri Korw Vfstos and Puolani F�fPrr-, sf_, divisinns os 3513':re-� shown on Ficiure 6 —Conceptual' Master P!yn for Rovoi Vistas, The proposed interconnecting road aligrTrT ent5 inclLidc: In Phase 1, constnic. ?h7 jf ,4C'r�ff;r'1'7i c7Cf e ZP7!:1f7f .S{,reet extension situate within the projecd site. ffwr .seclfrre!rt f,!ii s,,—ub-out the Ledoni Street extension on the southern project sins and will not connect it across the privote adjoining porrei (T -'0,K 7-�? .0211-014) owned by the Calvary Community Church of koro. • In Phose f, construct that segrr enc of Kekuona 'va Place e ten.5ion situated within the project site. * In Phase 1, construct a mauka-makai roadway connecting both the Leila ni Street and Kekurano 'ria Place extensions. * in Phij_ o fi, oxf— nd Kok tar),7r: 'r n No re from its existing terminus in K0n0 4!iqa5 suh ivisinn aortirw rd to :-orinect With the Kekuuna'ca Place alignMent within ft,e 1)rr?eF ° b-t'e constructed irr Phase l Nome of the roods pro,ot ,c dj c.r the ,project will connect to Ho 'omcl a Street or Pc­.rleh(r Sr.ropt io Prrr:lani Estates due to an intervening privately -owned percei (lPAK 1-6-013:004), Policy TRAI 3..1:._Stre_et 'fit; wchi!AL.. County street standards should be pedestrian - friendly, safely accommodate bic5jc es, accesslble to the disabled, and appropriate for its surrounding land use context. Applicant's response: The Appffcant wilfsotisfy the requirements cf Pv`rr_y TRAAJ-3.1 by constractiny all connectorraad'ways within the project to CmiotV dedicarblestandards that will rndude the construction of sidewalks alorrry 1i;ese roadways, as shown on Figure 6 — Conceptual Master plan for ROVol Vistas, in compfion<-r- ivifl, Condition N of Ordinance 03 ?.31, as f-egijestr°d tr ho �-vppnr.od_ f}�lir T ;1f —3.? Trri-fi4 C:rrlr'tir' S'.irrc9:ari�;. In orderto sloe,+ °rtaific. for pedestrian s,Jcty Dr- conifort, stt;r � irds for trDF)c ctllrallr, ; sliould be included, as part of the Co i my .�f H,,w a- i Strc c,.t St,'ind a cls. App ccarrt's response.. Per Co!irhtion 1J. the Applicant most construct _,il co)lcctor f'o(�d o'vperi>r;ssrble 5 within the proposed pro ec; but its inherent norrow design, already provides for traffic calming throtrcghotit most of the project site. Objective TRA N-2 Street Network Ccnnectivity. With the proposed construction of roadway extensions through the project site that will help to facilitate the interconnection of ruadwoy networks within Kona Vistas and pualani Estates subdivision that lie on either side of the project site; the proposed subdivision adheres to air objective of the CDP to develop a system of interconnected roads within Kona that will provide alternative transportation routes that will disperse automobile trigs orad reduce their length, while not compromising the through fanctions of arterials and major collectors with excessive intersections. SLirh inrf rconnections will also serve to: (a) provide safe choices for drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians; (6) promote walking card bicycling,- (c) icycling,(c) connect neighborhoods to each acher and to populor destinoticns, such as peaks, orraong others; t'd,} rare.',,ica'e opporrunitre.s fny r c- ;"df m ; N-� ioa-o-o-4 to their level of play' -sit rrl uff--"iyviiy+ e0ch}day 1pbylcry�lr Cyyr�c� �vu!? u+ le o, -, ghbcrhoods with 7d'cl!rOte �llJ llY�L trLslf� L41 �/L �Ll n11114.'.'1 F t'c°J rcc ccs ve.h cic utiles troveled orad travel trmc. thus irr Pro0:r Ot:c�;ir;f orad mit. citing the effects of auto emissions on the heoith of residents and the enilironment, (f) reduce emergency response tr,';7rs. (g) inrCa.5€? effeCtaVPnP55 Of Mif,7a:il .S€ "Vii -i'. de. five. ry; (h) restores arterial street o wacity to better serve regional long-distance travel needs, and (i) provide increased etnerc -icy evacuation opportar2ities. Policy PUB -4.4: Sewer priorities. In order to protect the nearshore water quality, the requirement to hookup to the County sewer systern (HCC Section 21-5) shall be strictly enforced. The highest priority in expanding the sewer system witNn the Kana Urban Area shall be to service any shoreline properties that do riot have access to a public sewer system and then to sere ce ;cats within approximately 1 mile of the shoreline. Any new subdivision within 1 mile of shoreline within the Kana Urban Area shall either hookup to the public sewer sy�zern, or provide a private treatment System, and/or install dry sewers (see Figure 4-10c Official Public Facilities and Serbia`e,� Map) Va4, r Mrinagern'ent). prlVMa :, ti ,,-i. If",.i17"f rNlectlon systems within the 1 mile za-ie spall be designed and canstmctec to County standards to enable potential connection to County sewer system. Thi? (0Ll `)ty shell ensure that TOds can be served by the public sewer system in a timely manner. App arnw .`s Th r, entire r") !Ir'f Rove VfrI u1 aou.:Mf.i l rc;ec_L V/;9 be L'GYV'?erteo ±o the County's 5t4wer sfsiea?. 3113':re-� Policy ENV -1,5: Sensitive Resources. In the context of Kuria's ecology and history, the following natural and cultural resources shall be considered sensitive and therefore shall be inventcaried, as part of any permit applgcation to the Ccaunty Planning Department (see Figures 4-8a to 4-8d}: Critical habitat areas ,is derntified by the U.S, Fish & Wildlife or County General Ilan; • Predominantly r7�.i-ive c-cor,y_tems, which may not he considered endangered but are valued :-)I 1-ic r rw.—)rly pristine condition; • Anchialine ounds subject to J Management Program addressed in Policy ENV - 1.10_ `ti nn Grgradation r`Anchialine Ponds; High-level groundw-n-(er recharge area which shall initially be defined as all lands mauka of the 1,5OOfact elevation and which may be refined by the Kona Mauka Watershed Management Program, - Historic trails; • Archaeological and historic sites subject to protection under HRS Chapter 6E; and, • Enhanced Shoreline Setback (see Policy LU -1.5). Any permit Lail} ic'itioi, th i- r�'7r_c}rr7p lases any of the above resources shall incorporate these resok,r�es :; assets. If a prognosed project will have significant, unavoidable, adverse to any of the above resources, the prel-Lim 'tion s•rall be denial of the implication a -)c the applicant will have the burdr:i} ref .3x:alaininc inv overriding considerat ons. I h p,esence of any of these resources shall qua li-y to, de)isity tr, nm`E rs thmu-fi a ralanned unit development based on potential gross rir�--I , ty -)IIo.. dud her tl- prr?v iI1ir'� 701- ir)g. The protect ian or rt -,M -rition of ar of these resources shcauld gUaIify l._)r Iia �t-iric. frorn the Kona Treas!.res I`Ll0d {See POI y LNV-3.3). Applicant's response. The subject properties are not situated within ars area identified cis the Kona Mauka Watershed Planning Area (Figure 4-8a) due to its location within the Kona Urban Areca. Regardless, the proposed project will be connected to the County's sewer system to avoid direct impacts upon the County's groundwater resources. Also dare to its locabon within the Kona Urban Areu and h0ow the 1,500 -foot elevation, as well as supported by the bialogicai survey, the ,i)bject properties erre not situated within a critical habitat area roar does it ronsi� t of predc:rmnantly native or endangered ecosystem. The subjec-1 a,rf7klf'! rf(S n, -r, !ocw,^,. 4, no fe'er from the .shoreline, and will not have any direcr of ect uporl the shore ±ine or coastaylprocesses. Tl -;e Flnuc Environmental Assessrnt-r;t `o� ,Y:e Rc.v rr V,:stas Housing Project (L,k'17 bi D -Roc 'L/iStO5 h'OLf r7p Fero iecr FIIi.-FL)NSO found that, "no threatened or -I rir�rrrvr rr dlal��r�f ;ear r:rrr.5 raw ir.str rY i'- iht, i1_SF LL�5 tppear to be present in the t'rc.,rect Site, roar a,`L` ' "'ere rrr7rgje; v ;,•crhiub;=' tivbl f o!s. No existing or proposed 381,, ., eckrtril.l ;h..,Ilyriotf:d (I, t.;CW Wont (or onimal) hobf tot is present In the Project Site. There- uppears to be nu potential to adversely affect rare, threatened, or orric,! Prrd plant species, Royal Vistas Nousinq Project Environmental Assessrr,ent 33 Adthough existing vegetcztic) n woaId be cleared during Project const. W ctic, r, r,ctivities including grading, the plants that would be removed are coli rtor,-r) trve. Landscaping is an important aspect for housing developments bath for resident's' experience and property valve. The Proposed Project would plant new vegetation os part of landscapirrrn following Project construction_ As requested in an early consulto tion letter /rc; (n DLNP, K ono Three would plant native or noninvasive trees as part of land,icapinq for the Proposed Pro ect_" Cumulatfvely, its findings also noi± ,d f hr: t ,: ra ;. wesent, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the Wc.niry ;-iove impacted biological resources through operation of the londsr_ane thrl-)--glt introduction of weeds, removol of native vegetation, and doss Qf'hobitat;o,- nj ive wildlife species. impacts to biological resources from the Proposed Project would be rr,inor, due to the limited number of native species present at the Pr[?iect Site and the protection measures outfFned to ovoid impacts to Federally-listed species and prevent spread of non- no?Tve weeds. Therefore, the cumulotive imparts of the Proposed Project in c c.POinotion with post, present, acrd reasonably fa(eseEoble future actions are xp�7cted to be fninor. " Ccncurnency The subject properties are not situated within a concurrency zone as depicted in Figure 4-3—Official Concurrency Map of thy, K .F)P. Hnv.rr t :ar, the Applicant commissioned SSFNI International to prepare : r updated Traffic Impact Analysis Report �TIAR) dated November 2021 fcrthe ;irc oo,,ce 450 -unit multiple family mousing project tha-. ;s inrlttr r.el a> Append:. rat t 71: F. -A, and updated on November 30, 2021 in curifwrraw-e with Seclior, 2� -2-4f, of the Zoning Code regarding Concurrency and inc _iced vith this r,, -,port .-rs Exl, hit G -- Royal Vistas Updated 7AR. In response to comments from residents of the existing s[ngle-family residential communities of Igor i V sty:_, _,nd Pualani Estates, the Applicant mewed the access for Phase I from Ki,kuan]-Or) Pace to the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway via a new un - signalized iniersecuan in an effort to reduce and delay traffic impacts on the Laky Street/Clueen Ka`anL�rnanu Highway intersection as well as traffic on Kelcuana`oa Place. This direct access for Phase I onto the (ween Ka'ahumanu Highway was analyzed hythe TIAR. In summary, the steady assumes that Phase I of the Royal Vistas multiple family housing project will be completed by 2024, with all trips generated by the 258units within this phase entering and exiting at the proposed Royal Vistas roadway and ill -Ar ;jutr?c, o—itn the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway (Route 11) via an unsignalized and channelized intersection. The study further assumes that the development of Phase II, consisting of the remaining 192 units, will be completed by 2029 along with the connection of Phase I I through Kekuana`na Place to Laka Street. At anticipated build -out of Phase 11 in 2629, along with its connection to Kekuana'oa Place, the segment of Queen Ka'ahuman u Highway between Lak€a Street and Hualalai load is anticipated to operate at Level of Service (LOS) C in the northbound direction and LOS C in the southbound direction during bath AM and PM peak hours, and found to be providing an "acceptable level of service" according to the concurrency requirements of the Zoning Code. The study then analyzed each oro'ect phase build -out during peak AM and PM hours sand its effects on forty-severi f47} turning rnovements at eight (8) intersections aiongthe Qu^ren dighway-Kuakini Highway (Route 11) alignment exter�d'i!ig fro:ii :1aiani Ruid to the north to Kamehatneha III Road to the south of the project site plus the effect on the main road segment "Route 11". Five of these existing intersections are Dnd tli,cc of thorn are Two Way Stop Controlled ("TLN5C") intersections. overall, the p-opjsed project is not anticipated to have a significant adverse impact to the existing level of service at these various intersections above the background rate. Each transportation facility {State and County highway,,, rear:'• arc:1 transportation facilities) uses defined performance r e mire "car -_ap-.a ity and levels of service, and for each facility type, one o_ more of the porforniauice measures serves as the primary determir•,xnt of li'vr,l al - rory rr� C1 M' } T•iis LOS -determining parameter is called the Measure of Effectiveness ("00U) foi c•aeh facility type. LOS is defined in HCC Section 25-2-46icj as "Level of Service, or "LOS", means a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and small be determined using the procedures in the latest edition of the "Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board." For signalized intersections, the MOE procedure used is the Overall LCIS, which measures "delay". The Overall LOS is determined by calculating the average control delay per vehicle, Once delays have been estimated for each lane group and aggregated for each approach and the intersection as a whole, then the appropriate LOS is determined using the Signalized Intersections Delay Chart, which specifies the time delay as letters A -F, with increasing time delays associated with each letter. For TWSC intersections, the MOE= procedure used includes both LDS and v/c. measures, L05 for a TWSC intersection is determined by the measured control delay (see "LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections" in Manual) and is defined for each movement, expressed as A through F. LOS is not defined for the intersection as a whole for TWSC intersections, Vehicles travelling along the major, free flow road {Route 11 in this case) of a TWSC intersection proceed with minimal or no delay at all. Those v0,1rlr­, r :,broaching the intersection afcng the minor movement are controlled by a stop sign and thus experience delay attributable to the volume of vehicles passing along the free-flow road and the traffic gaps available. A traffic movernprit can have a poor LOS but low v/c, which suggests the traffic volumes along that movement are low but must wait a long time to make the movement. These movernerrts affect fewer vehicles and are on the minis movements. As stLited in the manual "in evaluating the overall perforrnarrce of TWSC iiitc- r,er.tions it is important to consider mf-,asures of effectiveness in addition to Ciµ iy, iucl aI , v/c -,&(,-1---` 11 tid "By ..,sire c)n a single measure of effectiveness for th" +,,orst rrov,,rrie,it only, r,uLh as delay for the minor -street leftturn, users may F_fficctivc traffic cont,ol cocisioris." Tn(e v/c rv1OE meas.ires'l-e val„rne fvl to {r..F:arity fc1, ars' expresses the -atio of the v-.)lurrie of tra=fic uta zing the I \-Y (: intersec-1011 tc t:1e inax:',nurrl V;,)lur.,e 'M :fehicy es that Ca l..e acco-m �1od ated by the iritersectic)rr during a spec ific'oe i,7d. A v/c ratio under 0.85 wp..,i 1.4 tie Inti --1- c -c -ion it opor s.tlrlg .ii- ler capacity;In.7 4 Xf.t? cl4'E'. rls'l:nys are not expel ier�•;_ed. An in terse Lic ri is upertitr"i E. near ills coDDciLy wrier c rtit :)5 range from C.95 0.95. Un::-7hle f parr. ex,7c ctied-,vh;-,.n thi, V/Cr'a-r,-} is betv,^ren 0.95 and 1.0. The study concluded that two of the TWSC traffic movements are problernatic. Hualalai Road (N)'s East Bo;jnd Left turn movernent currently operates at LDS "F" for both the LOS and the v/c. MOE's during the AM study period, and will continue to do so during the five-year study period. Route 11 at Kuakinf Highway's North Bound left turn PM rnoverneW currently is LDS "E" and will stay LDS "E" for both the LOS and the v/c MOE's during the five- year study period. Ncvcrthel.,_s t, with or without the proposed project, certain turning movements at the fol owing intersections are or will be experiencing unacceptable levels of service �L:.aS L a,ie F1 Upon completion of Phase I anticipated in 2024: 1. 0 it -or Ka°ahunianu Highway and Henry Street signalized intersection a V%`e,tbuurid left tui n muvernent onto hiehway at LOSE, due to signal ti-ni 7i,. �A­ich r --n :)re Dr.-jr..,,tc.d to reduce approach delay. 4113':re-� 2. Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) unsignalized intersection a. Eastbound left turn movement onto highway at LOS F during both AM and PM peak hours to due high traffic valurne on Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway. 3. Queen Ka'ahumanu 'Highway and Hualalai Road (South) unsignalized intersection a. Westbound left turning movement at LDS F during both AM and PM peak hours to due high traffic volume on Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway. 4, Queen O'ahumanu Highway at Royal Vistas roadway unsignalized intersection a. Westbound left turn onto highway at LOS P during AM peak hour due to high volumes along the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway, `+. Quer ?i� Ka`aliinnw.i H!F,'i -,iy lind Kuakinl Highway unsignalized intersection a, Nor hbnr.nri lc --ft on -n I•.0 ikini -i ghl- '?ay at LDS E during peak PM hour. 6. QLii,oi, Ki'2hi.jnir)n.j Hind I-akoStreet signalized intersection a ELia-LbD-ii-d life ,L.i ri own o l�i hway at LOS F during AM peak hour and L )S F at Phil nec--k-io.ir. h}. WesWOUrld Ief L turn onto highway at LOS E during both AM and PM peals hours due to traffic volumes and split phasing for the Lako Street approaches, The study concludes that none of the unsignalized intersections satisfy LI -e Peal: Hour Warrant for a traffic signal. The Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway ar c KI-11(in i Highway intersection will satisfy the Peak Hour Warrant in 2024. The sJIF,f,-ir11011 C)i a traffic warrant does not require the installation of a traffic control s r°DI Z;nd ro•7e is recommended by the study. Widening of Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway in the vicinity of Lako Street is needed in 2024 to provide for lanes and a permissive left -turn phasing onto Lako Street. Upon cornpletion of Phase II anticipated in 2029, the increase in background traffic and traffic generated by the proposed project will further reduce the LOS at several of the intersections described above, with the addition of the Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and PuapUa `anui Street intersection that will experience LOS E for left turns during both the AM and PM peak hours due to cycle length. Lefttu!rn volumes at this intersection are low, however, and should clear every cycle. The TZAR recommended that based on the existing traffic volurnes and future projections of Royal Vistas on the surrounding roadways, the Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Lako Street intersection and some individual movements at other intersections are expected to deteriorate to LOS E or worse, The wla dening of Queen 4211':Me-� Ka'ahumanu Highway to 4 -lanes, and the completion of Ali `i Highway is needed to increase the north -south regional capacity. In the interim, the following system- wide intersection improvements are recommended for consideration by Hawaii County and H 04T: 1. Queen Ka'ahurnanu Highway and Palani Road Existing and future analysis indicate this intersection will operate at an acceptable LOS. Improvements to this intersection are not recommended at this time. 2. Queen Ka`ahurnanu Highway and Henry Street Existing; and future analysis indicate this intersection will operate at an acceptable LOS. Improvements to this intersection are not recommended at this time. A. queen K@'ahurnanu Highway and Hualalai Load (North) This intersection does not pass the Four -Hour warrant or peals hour warrant for any coedit.,;, -r. The high delay is due to the high volume on the Queen Ka,ahc. m,�fiu +ohway. There are 44 vehicles and 10 vehicles making the wes:bouriyi left L.rr, in the AM and PM peak hours, respectivety. Whe rl the de :D�,,,,xperio-iccd by drivers reaches this level, the eastbound drivers are likely to find alternative routes. A single lane roundabout will improve traffic opt.,ration5 at this intersection for the existing condition but wors�,r t:) LOS F after 2024. A roundabout is not recommended at this interseclJon, d. ween Ka'ahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) At the westbound left turn delay gets worse„ driv;-rs may dt,d*! to r;. r- I'crapt,6'anui Street to access the Queen Ka'ah1J1Ttar3U Highway ir3 the sc.0 —bound direction. This intersection did not brass the Four -Hear w.Irr,irt or the Peak -Hour warrant for the existing sir future conditions. Ba--Iod nr existing traffic operations, it is recommended an acceleration lane ve installed forthe westb:mnd right tarn onto the Queen Ka`ahurnanu_y- A single -lane roundabor.t wi irip-ove traffic operations at this intersection for the existing conditirn hO wni wn to LOS == after 2024. A roundabout ill not recommended at this inlet 5acr_ion. 5. queen Ka'ahurnanu Highway,7nci Street Signal timing should be mon torc-d ri:l C,: l5 nrt-.d d -n in:.r :r#.`il the. probatillitythat queueson Queers Ka`aliunt�2nu Hi,-j.hwiy c-ari �_leai the intersection in 1 cycle. 6. Queen Ka`ahumanu Hig,)way and RoVa 'vistas R:)ad pray This intersection will f.i-ictian acceptahlythroueh the full PhaJ•_ 1 l]LIIICIOUt. Before any Ph hi .,p 2 rr., ncos fire occupied, 't 's ­t.ro-,n r1,«n&.-d that t1, c, connection to KekuieCa 'lace is completed so that 'iova I `W' xt�s P-7Lise 2 `left out' traffic c-Dn dccc' ,-, the Lako Street traffic signal. 43lP:rgc 7. Queen Hir, iwav and Ku:*ini H-; hway This intersection p,i.scsthe PcL,;k HourworpL.rit dUrnr? _all icDlc 1 -u -urs for all conditions. The sat sfartion o= a traffic signal doe5 not mean a traffic signal creeds to be installer. T-iere are L)-1-er factors thst should be analyzed when installing a traffic signal, such as roaew iy geometry. added delay to a traffic network, and the impact of rear -end iccidents that occur at new traffic signals- Analysis of this intersection vj th '`curious phasing showed that the overall delay at the inler5r,t-lior wou d icrease, while the northbound left tura will still operate 3t LOS L or worse. A traffic signal should not be installed at this intrr-sr:ctiar. Rc,} al 'I las traffic has very Iittl-. cffect on this intersection. A ,irElr lane rr.r,nd;�hrriI ,,dill I(', Al I O'� F :r„ I1 -o existing AM peals hour condition, and LOS F for all fut,jre -o')citions. A roundabout is not recammendi:,d at this inters cticn. 8. Queen Ka`ahumanu lig`i-vvav and Lako Street The Lako Street I ntersection operates at LOS F/a (AM/PM) with or without the Royal Vistas project in the 2039 condition. Lako Street currerwtty has split phasing (sequential rather than concirrrertl on the Lako Street approaches. Changing the 1-orn ,plit would hc- 1) I:,wPrthr, deltiy, rill-�iniagh several movements will still operaLe a: LCS C of titoi wr. Tnis inLersec=ior tivould also improve significantly with marc nart,� snr.it i regional capacity crcvided by the completion of t•)e widenirg of 0,ueerr Ka'ahumanu Hig'rwav Irom Henry Street to Kamehanwha ill Read and the ,-onstruction of Ali -i Highv.-ay_ 9. Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and III i'rojd Existing and future analysis indicate thin ir7tersectian will operate at an acceptable LCIS. Improvements to this i -e: -section are not recommended at this time. Section 25-2-46 of the Zoning Cade regarding Concurrency Requirements states the following: (e� Mitigation required. (1) If the L05 for any transportation facility in the project area is (A) currently worse than the acceptable level of service, or (B) projected to become worse than the acceptable level of service during the five year period of the TiAR, any rezoning of the property, if approved, .shall contain conditions that require mitigation of adverse traffic effects before occupancy of the project is permitted, or that occupancy be delayed until the level of service has reached the acceptable level and is no longer projected to be worse than the acceptable level. (2) Where the LOS deficiency is due to roadway or intersection deficiencies in the immediate vicinity of the project, the conditions of zoning shall require local mitigation, Where the deficiency in LOS is due to 441P:rgc insufficient capacity in the transportation Facilities serving the project ,area, the conditions of zoning shall require area mitigation. As no transportation facility in the Project area is currently worse than the acceptable level of service, nor is pro ected tc became worse than the acceptable level of service during the five-year period of ,he l 1AR, no rnibgation is required. The Final Fnvironmental Assessment (FFA) for the Royal Vistas Housing Project dated September 2021 and the Planning Department's issuance of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) supports the conclusion that the "Potential impacts to the Kona Vistas sr►hdivM'Orr would be nilevia[vil2'v constructing the Royol Vistas Roadway intersection with Queen Kcf oh amono Highway. ACso, the traffic im,prict analysis straws no impacts to LLS frrom rhrs fro ect above the background rate to the intersection of Queen Ko'ohumcryu hilah,vuY and take Street which is the moire entrance to tine neighboring Kono Vistos Both the FEA and FONSI also recognizes ".—the of Kekuana'na Strepr, sand the constructiOn of thatportion of the teih,-ni Stroo! f ?o flrojoc..1 Siro to be stubbed -out or) the south boundoTy a the Cc! vary Church property b2! .tri°err the Project rand Kana Vistas, and erre raew read would be constructed fRa!�'oi Vistas Roodway). All would be dedicated to the Cour! y �s part of the Proposed Project. Oared on comments received on the Draft EA or, potential impacts to troffic from the connector roads (Append(x 1b), Figure 3 shows the locotOn and phasing of these connector roads, While ,�Iuur'e 11 from the Kona CDP shows cornector root ds connecting Counr.v €7L4,no J r'r'if?7n1 Street Or the (Ona Vistas Pr`)?r'Ct} to c(Junty {ownf'd Ho'omarr a Street On tete' uuu ,wi tstutea pres ec,) crud Kek!iunu 'uo r'? ;ce (ir) thei'Conu Vistas project) to Fount;' nvjaerl Paulehicr Street (31 the Pi o)f-inI Lstot�=s prata�ct), these con 0eCWns WOuid not be htaQ .7s imirt of ncc Prr)pc.-.ii'.i F' drl twn(7iiy, no rnooka-mcxkal connector roods from Huckd ai Roud to C211v e!) '({k cr�,carrTc,rar. �+ic?tikn: cr;� are proposed as part of the Proposed Prafr�tit. Tit re-forp. Ehe P oposec, Pro, ect­,vowd have no effect to neighbors in adfacent subdmsrons from Phrase f, un,i on tr nwriiw,ai impacts after Phase ll," (emphasis added) County water for the project is still avaMble, and the Applicant has maintained its current commitment deposit. Th , propo�;ed project will also connect to the County's wastewater system tiro, ;er v ces the Kailua-Kona area. Attempts to contact the Hawaii Ernergenry Mtamig=ent Agency (HIEMA) to confirm the location of existing opo r��' nr;iI s iviI du1f.r,c• -;'-e ns within the immediate area of the project site were unsr.ecessful. Should 1111KIA or Hawaii County CiviI Defense Agency require any 7-idition aI siren to be situated within the proposed project to provide for adequate coverage, the Applicant will comply. C. Granting of the time extension world riot be controry to the original reasons for the granting of the change of zone. Approval of the requested time extersions to secure Final Plan Approval for the proposed 450 -unit multiple family hvr.5ing project and to cornrnence and complete its construction within a period often (10) years will remain consistent with the original reasons for its approval in 1984, as well a5, de•i lonstr ited in discus5ion5 throughout this report as it :-rr-rtains tct c on ;is r• icv •Arith the K6:UP. In summary, the Applicant finds that approvr7l of al arreridlrnert recaues,.s will be: • Consistent with the GereraI flan LU PAG n,_�p of Ur+ ar. Expansion Area 8rt(i Low Density Urban. Consistency with the General Pian C,Dz: ;, pulicie5, ter• J t.0 rrdards relative to the housing and land use elements. • Appropriate infrastructure such as water, wastewater, and access are or will be made available. a No irresulvable issues relating to drainage, botanical, or avifaunal. • Havrnt appropriate archaeological/cultural safeguards or completing appropriate Mitigation 'r14.'r�r:6J14'.S. It is Ilius malnLair:ed that the reasons used to support the existing zoning back in 1984 still apply to the rr.--quesded time extensions and amendment. It should be n0'ed, irnwover, that Brice the RM -5 zoning was approved in 1984, Lhere have been Lwo (2) substantive changes to the Zoning Code that relate to project of this mature. One was the adoration of the Kana Community Development Plan in 2008, for which Mrripliance has been extensively discussed earlier in this re part. Tare other was t[-.2 �i:lopt ion c=thc- concurrercy provision, Ser.}ion 25-2-45. That I5ion roqui,f— liir31 III ro/orirg, ins Iird ng time exrrr;inn, r,r:dn--=,'r,ililr, p,•ntrilale winter, and civil def( --,se siren r=sunccr--is- Aiid as discussed earlier, the project rwrr_t�ts these tests. The other provision re,ates to allowance and of 'Short Tnrm Vacation Rental �."STVR") in certain areas as o:,lthnec in Sect on 25-4-16 of the Zor ,lrg .ode. Tire subject properties are not situated with 'r ai at ea desiLnated fo- Resort use, o -- as a Resort Nadr • Therefore, STVRs may b(� pc,n-.ittr,,r.l -,vith n hr: "7cr S a I e " r11 il,s within the proposed 450 -unit multiple family Iruu.irig pi(-)jL I?r,uyidtd 1:11at t`rese "For Sale" units are part of a Conder ninium pr,a:ir.rty - vinic:• li , defin.-rl lrncl r;crc rrrt r.. by Chapters 514A or 5148, Hawaii Revised St":Tutc. . 4613':re-� Coastal Zone Management Due to the location cf the subject properties outside of the Special Management Area (SMA) and about 4,400 feet fror°n the nearest shoreline, and the improvements and mitigation measures to be undertaken during the development of the project, the Applicant finds that granting of the requested time extensions and requested clarification regarding roadway improvements will not have any substantial adverse impacts on coastal processes or conditions, r -n w ll its approval be contrary to the objectives and polices of Chapter 205A, HRS relwi --g to Coastal Zone Management. The proposed action will not create sigrOwant adverse impacts upon nearby and immediately adjacent properties nor the important coasta-, rescurces within this part of North Kana. The proposed 450 -unit Royal Vistas multil) C_' r.irni y hor. ,irg project is the final component of a 171± -acre single- and mu tiple-`a'm y reside:liie,. community that was approved by both the Stale La -'d Use Cornwission'3nd Hauvai`i County Council in 1984. The project site is s tuyrted within tl,e Kona Urban Area that is specificilly designated to direct future grows 1- and to promote infill of areas adjacent to existing developRit�rtits, As-mcntionod, rl c project site is situated irnmediately adjacent to or just one lot array from the existing single fannily residential communities of Kona Vistas, Pualani Estates and lolani subdivisions. As traffic is frequently the prevailing concern of any proposed development, the project will assist in facilitating the 'interconnection of these existing communities though the construction of north -south and mauka-makai roadway segments within the project site that will al.Zr) w th ex sting roadways within both Kona Vistas and Pualani Estate subdivision. The.'! dov(,lopment of Kona Vistas suorlivision and Lake Street now provides an important mauka-rnakai link between loler)'r ; ubdivision and Kuakini Highway. This same form of roadway networking, as promoted by the ICCDP, will be facilitated by the approval of the requested time extensions. While the subject properties are currently vacant, it was part of the Kona Field System and was likely used for commercial and subsistence agriculture as well as for cattle pasture until the mid -1500. There appears to be evidence that: the subject properties were bulldozed sometime around the 1950s through the 1970s in preparation for commercial agriculture. Based on the historical use and biological environment of the subject properties, for which studies were prepared and included as part of the FEA, no threatened or endangered plant species as listed by the UFS appear to be present in the Project Site, nor are there uniquely valuable habitats. No existing or proposed federally designated critical plant; (or animal) habitat is present, Therefore, there appears to be no potential to adversely affect rare, threatened, or endangered plant species The project will connect to the County wastewater system. Any impacts front soil erosion and runoff during site preparation and construction phases can be 471 ,' ., adequately mitigated through compliance with existing regulations and propp= construction} practices. Air emissions generated during the construction phasr.- for the proposed proiect will be mitigated by existing construction regulations. W th these precaution8ry measures in place, the proposed deve'cupment is net anticipated to have any substantial adverse effects upon nearby coastt.l rc,scurees or the surrounding environment. The Applicant continues to adhere to and irnplwnaert conditions of approval for the projoct that vv 11 onsur>e that impacts on coastal resources, if any, are rninirnized- An archaeological inventory surrey (AIS) was conducted in 1084 for the original 171± -acre projec:l ` x pi Ir-ir a 5 -acre portion in the southeastern corner originally intended to be developed by the Hawaii Preparatory Academy. As requested by the State Historic Preservatic °� _~'vision, a ne,v - archaeological inventory survey to identify all archaeulugic:;l historic pi upe; ,_ies present in the Project Site and an update of the previous archaeologicc11 cccame ata=icn to include site plans for each site with sate IJULlra.lu ie'< Yac: to ear Irnpacted by `)u Idoz ng, photographs of all sites and features, an r:s=essrnent of their integrity, :.ind site significance were completed on behf-111 of the Applicant. These a(ld'rionral Slam, °r rr port5 for berth the previously excluded 5 -acre site and the remainder of the pro,tct �to including the existing County -owned drainageways were completed in 2018 and 2020, respectively, and included within the 2021 final environmental assessment for the Loyal Vistas project. These studies found 18 archaeological sites within the original survey area of ihproject site, of which 6 sites we'Fe determined to be pre-Corhtact era, 3 sites associated w-th habitation, 1 with agriculture, a single petroglyph site, and one single feattjm si-mp (Sits} 10012) rnnta=ned two bunals. The remaining 12 sites were determined tc::>>e tris€uric era, with many cif the sites associated with coffee agriculture and cattle ranching, as well as two historic era habitation sites. The ot.ir.,r All for tho 5 acre site found 22 ni.?) J'sy ido.ntified sites, which were dr,tormirod Le ,je pi inlar ly a ricultural terraces associated with dare -Contact area 4u, Histirir_ efLj ,irr cult.mc,_ A pre -Contact era to later past -Contact era lava tube burn_ an,:l := portion of the old railroad berm were recorded as part of this separate survey. The two burials (Site 103012) described in the 1984 Aly were removed and reinterred off -project prior to 1984. The site was fur#her excavated to ensure that all iwi had been removed, then back-filled and levered by bulldozer. The preservation plan for the railroad berm and petroglyph sites has been prepared ,and submitted to the DLNR far review and approval„ A burial treatment plan forthe lava tube burial within the 5 -acre site has already been prepared by the Applicant and approved. F.-)Ilawing ins sle: aclatr:tian of an archaeological preservation plan, there are not ex�ected Lc be any irnpacts to historic or archaeological resources fr©rn the proposed a­3;ect. There'c-e, no cumulative impacts from the Proposed project in. corhnbination with p: <,a, pr( ­,c [. or rr-asonahly f€arsseeable future actions are anticipates{ to h}sto. Ic Lrr .irchaeological resources. 481P-,rgc A cultural Impact assessment (CIA) was prepared in 2G20 as made a part of the FEA. The study rioted that the region of Hblualaa was developed into a royal cc -1.e- in the late 1500s to early 1700s under the reigns of Keakamahana (reigned 1680-17DO) anti Keakealaniwahine (reigned 1700-1724), with many 'ali`i and konohiki resicierici�� aiic nurneroos religious sites- known to have existed here. The majority of the heiau and royal residences were constructed along or near the coast, most notably at Karnoa Point south of the project area. The study further noted that this royal center at Hblualoa was eclipsed in the second half of the 1700s by the royal center in the Kahalu-u and. Keauhou region. The project area was also a par'- of i hr, V nn�i ^irld system that extends north at least to Kau ahupua`a and south to 1-16nauna, . we from the coastline and east to the forested slopes of Hualilai. In the post ronrnrt c rti, the Kora Field System hosted olio pla-ming of coffee, sugar, sisal, citrus, a17Li ccttu11 until eventually the land was used for c -tale pasture. As Hart of th(, CIA, persc•na irtc•rvi�,dr, were sought in an effort to provide rtl7i�i�;'$; hir r: Tri ni�il hi�in--y of I w. project area. Based on the [nterviews cor'Auc tee:. thie report r_017rludes Lkit "Ari analysis of the potential effect of the prqr,)!ed construction of rpsiccn(•`'s on culturalre5ources, procticef Cr burets, fts ,pc:dto isolate culturol resources, practices or, bclrcfs,!�ar`t'r their ;setting, and the poreptiol of the project to introduce e)ernents 4vh.ch may s'itE'r the setting +n which ct;trtrralpractices take place is o requirement of they (rwo. "?0. 13(s ^`on i:�istoocol rE.:Fc7rctt r;17d responses frorr7 the trbovF rdste,a cc�f7tacts, it is r-eos()oobfti .. to i OM'Ir1r7i' t lfrl, iiF'd'F' `vorr�r# �iF' r7[> Frrrfi td?7`7i1� Ci.��ir:r'C1j ;ri7i:r Ct'.4 (7j�r"'te'f'� CPr7CJ� fj{arr' K,()uh! be no C.'iel-t (1C ver}F' e!fect upon ca.'� dr:iipruc or ±Yie',broader In vev,- ul the Hawaii State Supreme Court's "PASH" and TO Fa`akai O Ko 'Morro" circ 1- o, -)s, `he issue relative to native Hawaiian gathering and fishing rights r77L,st bfe acciressed. These rights must be addressed iii ter -w7 of the cultural, historical, and natural resources and the associated traditiunal and cc,stornary practices of the site. St,�r:ie,. ;prepared in support of the proposed project and the amendment requests fc-iurd r valuable cultural, historical and n.7gr,rriI resources within the subject prof, r,rties that wokrld support trodit ramal or cu5talnar•,r N tive Hawaiian rights being practiced on the suhject prope , ties. 'I IiIL,-M, it i,, believed that the proposed project would have nfl adverse imp�:ct rc� itivi, to th,, cultural and historical resources of the area. Based on the above findings, the Applicant maintains that allowing for the development of the 450 -unit Royal Vistas multiple family housing project and related improvements will not have any substantial adverse impacts on the surrounding area, nor will its approval be contrary to the obifcli oc, r lid po ::If -4 or Chapter 205A, HRS, relating to Coastal Zone Management. 4913':re-� Vlll. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS IN JUSTIFICATION OF REQUESTS As extensively outlined within this report, the Applicant finds that it has made a substantial commitment of tirne and resources to comply with all of the conditions of approval of both Ordinance 02 131 immediately upon its purchase of the subject properties at the end of 2015. The scope of the Applicant's requests is limited to an extension of time of ten (10) years to secure Final Plan Approval and to cornmente and complete construction of the first increment of the proposed project and to amend Condition N to provide clarity on the extent of dedicable roads required to be constructed. Since its acquisition of the subject pro;;mho:, ir, la;e 2415, the Applicant has diligently pursued the development of the 450 -unit Royal 'Vistas mid -market, multiple family housing project as approved by the Hawaii County Council -o the 'xtc'nt that the original reasons for granting of Ordinance 02 131 is still relevant and approur- ale. BEFORE THE LAND USE COMMISSION OF THE STAVE OF HAWAII In the Matter of the Petition of GAMLON CORP. For Amendment of District Boundary and Reclassification of Certain Lands Situated at North Kona, County, Island and State of Hawaii. DOCKET NO. R83-549 This is to certify that this Is a true and correct COPY Of the Dedskxt W Order on IN01 the office Of the Steteiedtt,llolttu!a ii. L if �����'3-- FINDINf'S OF FACT, CONCT.TiS, TON'S OF r AW AND DECISJON AND CRFR BEFORE THE LAND USE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF HAWAIT In the Matter of the Petition of j DOCKET NO. A83-549 J GAMLON CORP. ti For Amendment of District � Boundary atnd Reclassification } of Certain Lands Situated at � North Kona, county, Island � and State of Hawaii. � FINDING OF FACT, C:GNCL-US1ONS OF 1JA AND DECISION AND CRDT R Petri[-ner, OAMLON CORP. , tl,-iws ii cc)-Cporatjon, tj-led. the Petitiuri in the above- rap �-ioned tr:,- Lt.cr pursuant to C iptcr 205, Hawaii Reviaed Statutes, and the Mules of Practice and FroQedure of the Land Use Commission, State of hawaii, to amend the land use district boundary of certain larids cons] sting of approximately 173 .66 acres, identified: as Tax Map Key 'Nos- 7-6-21:4, 9, Z0, 11, 12, 13, 15, 1.6 and 17 (hereinafter referred to as "sub ect prape i- ty") situated in the ahupua' a of Holiaalca. First and Seoond, North Kona, County, Island and State of Hawaii, from the Agricultural to the Urban District. The Land Use Co�imission, having heard and examined the testimony and evidence during the Public hearing held on September 8, 1953, in Kailua-Xona, Hawaii, and having considered the entire record filed in this docket, hereby makes the following findings of fact acid conclusions of law. FINDINGS OF FACT PROCEDURAL RATTERS I 1. On May 3, 1993, Gamlen Corp. (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") filed this Petition to amend the Agricultural District boundary at Holualoa First and Second, North Kona, County, Island and State of Rawaii, to reclassify the subject. property into the Urban District. 2- The Land Use Commission (hereinafter referred to as "Commissi€an" ) held a public hearing on this Petition an Sep�er^be 8, 2983, in the Resolution Room, Kona Hilton Hotel, Kailua--Kona, Hawaii, pursuant to notice of hearing published in the Honolulu. Advertiser and the Hawaii Tribune Herald on August 3, 1983. 3. Th-- Coir rii scion. received one timely request for intervention oii .i-Jy Vii), 1.9.3 from Elizabeth Aran Stone on behalf of the Honest Enviro,-)nc�nt-��l Citizen's Against. Progress, and dented. the request ir, the a'o trice of Ms. Stone at t:,he hearing, TI -Le Commission received two untimely requests to appear as pzhlic witnesses from James Sogi, representing Mr. aizd Mrs. Roy Nagle, Property owners in the area, Maile Akimeseu, representing the Friends of Kamoa Faint, Inc., and permitted thQm to testify as public witnesses. ESCRIPTIQN OF SUBJECT PROPERTY 4. The subject property is located ma'uka of Kuetkini highway approximately 2.6 miles south of the Palani Road - Kuakini -2- Highway intersection in Xailua-Vona, Hawaii. The subject property is bordered by vacant, undeveloped lands to the north and generally to the east, by the Kalani Sunset, Leilani Sunset, and Kainana Subdivisions to the south, and by the old Kailua-Keauhou Middle Road to the west.. 5. With the exception of an undivided interest in five acres cf Tax flap Key No. 7-6-21: 17, which is owned in fee simple by Hawaii Preparatory Academy, Kalott Properties N.V., a Netherland Antilles corporation, a wholly-owr_ed subsidiary Of Petitioner, Owns all Of the sUbject property. Petitioner holds an option to purchase the subject property from Kalott Properties N.V. Hawaii Preparatory Academy and Kalott Properties N.L. have authorized PetitiDner tc file this Petition. 6. 'Hawaii Tax Map Xeys Nos. 7-5-21: 14, 18 and 19 are within the general boundary of the subject property but are not being considered for reclassification as a part of this Petition. Parcel 18, owned by the COUnty of Hawaii and `the Dillingham Investment Corporation, and Parcel 19, awned by the County of ljawaii, are an exi:�-tin,g and proposed drainage way for the Hclualca 5o11001 arLd Horseshoe Pend streams. Parcel 1.4 is awned by John P. Ellbogen. j 7. OrL August 23, 1982, the Mate of Hawaii instituted all CRII-LLte774-- domain actiork against Kalott Properties, N.V. to niem-n a portion of Tax Map Key Nos. 7-6-21, parcels 13 ( _578 and 10 (2-202 acres) For Ule Kuakini Highway realignment -3- project. As of the date of the public hearing, final judgment had not been entered in this action. 8. The subject property is currently leased to and utilized by the PalaDai Ranch for cattle grazing under a month -to - Month lease. 9. The United Mates Department of Agriculture's 1973 Sail Conservation Service Sail Survey Map of island of Hawaii, classifies the soil of the subject property as being in the Punaluu series and an extremely rocky peat. Permeability is moderately rapid, runoff is slow, and erosion Lazard is slight_ 14. The elevation of the subject property .ranges from 350 Feet to 700 feet at its mauka boundary.. The slope generally ranges from 6% to 20%. ll. Vegetation on the subject property is composed of almost entirely erotic spec:imeris, with Koa-ha.nle the dominant species. The subject -property noes not support any plant life considered rare, threatened or endangered. Several native species and exotic species common to Kona and found throughcutJ the State also grown on the subject property. 12. Approximately 75% of the subject property is located within the defined boundaries of the Holualoa drainage basis. The Federal Insurance Administration has designated two Portions of the subject property adjacent to the bath sides of the -4- Horseshoe Fiend and Holualoa SGhool intermittent streams in Flood Zone "A,') which is defined as =Cas suscep-.ible to a 100 -year flood, in the Flood Insurance Tate Neaps for the Island of Hawaii. PROPOSAL FOR DEVELOPKENT 13. With the exception of the five acres owned by the Hawaii Preparatory Academy, Petitioner proposes to develop a single-family and multi -family residential subdivision an the subject property. Petitioner intends to develop approximately 500 residential units of which 215 would be single-family residential units and 285 would be multi -family residential units. 14. Petitioner proposes to build the single-family residential ianits On approximately 103 acres, with each unit as y a minimum lot size of approximately 1.5, 000 sq. ft. The ;yeti Li-oner estimates that single-fwmily density will be at approxi - Mately 2.1 units per acre. 15. Petitioner proposes to btiild �ault� �«farn�..`_yr townhouse residential units on approximately 65 acres at an est-imated density of RLI_8.0 (1 unit per 8,040 feet sof land area) or 4.4 units per acre. 16. Petitioner proposes to use the Holualoa School Stream as a boundarY between th8 single-family units (to the ; South) and the multi -family units (to the north) . MCCM 17, Petitioner intends to market 25f to 50% of the single-family units as housa/lot packages and 50 to 75% as lot - only sales_ Petitioner intends to market the multi -family units as residential, as opposed to resort, townhouse, condominiums. Pursuant to the County of Hawaii's incremental zoning raciiiirements, Petitioner is required to construct dwellings on at least 25% cf the lots in its first phase proposed residential subdivision sion i n order to obtain rezoning of second phase, 18. Petitioner estimates that it w€Ill sell the vacant house lots fox approximately $70,000 (1983 dollar) and three- and four-bedroom house/lot packages. for $150,000 (1983 dollar). The multi -family units will range in price from $90,000 to $180,000 (1983 dollar)_ 19. Petitioner has agreed in principle to work jointly to provide housing opportunties for lova- and medi.iam-income residents. Petitioner proposes to cooperate with. State and CountY no -i :iug agencies in order to offer ten percent, of the lots and house and lot packages at prices that will enable residents to quality for Federal- or State -assisted housing loan programs. 20.. Hawaii W- OUSing Authority (HEA) feels that approximately 10% of the housing units should be affordable by low a­�d modez-ate iicome families. 21. HKA recommends that a condition be included to a s tor_ that 10% of the units will be affordable to low and MM moderate income fainilies, as determined by the County of Hawaii and EM. 22. The Draft Kona Regional Plan estimates that approximately 40% of the households in Kana are currently facing sorne kind of housing problem which ranges from the household paying tDo large a percentage of its income for housing, living r in substandard or unsafe housing, luring in a crowded household or combinations thereof. 23. Petitioner estimates construction costs for on --site and off-site improvements to be approximately $35 million (1983 dollar). This estimate includes major drainage improvements, road construction, site preparation, and labor and materials. 24. Petitioner estimates that Phase 1 and 2 can be completed within 6 1/2 years from the date of the Commission's approval of this Petition. 25. Petitioner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Blue Chip Corporation, a Japan corporation. Petitioner holds approxi- mately $14 million of i.rxvesurne=it:. property free of any mortgages and can use said to finarict: the proposed project. If necessary, Blue Chip Corpvrat_'.on will provide any additional, funds needed tc complete the project. STATE: AND COUNTY P LAINS 26. The subject property is situated within the state Land Use Agricultural District. it is contiguous to urban classi- fied lands to the south which have been developed for lour density -7- residential uses (Kalani Sunset, Leilani Sunset., a;xd Kainana Subdivisions). To the west, the Kailua--Keauhou Middle lead (-10 foot right-of-way), which is in the Agricultural I)istrict, :ep;q- rates the subject props-rt.y f2--c--n adjoining Ag1 z � n ]...,.ia al alld U--L)CIII Districts. Lands to t_ik: _nort-h are designated F.g�iG: _11uat ail . Lar dE3 to the east are €fie z iq-aaLed 27. Tlic County of Eawaii General Plan ]Land Use Pattern AIloccjti:3n �zzide (.UPAG) reap designates most of the subject property as "Alternate Urban Expansion" and a small area as "Low Density Urban.'" The two stream beds and adjacent areas are designated as "Flood Plains." 28. The draft Kana Regional Plan prepared by the County of Hawaii's Planning Department recommends that: the subject property be devQlcped for low density residential (RES -4, 4 units per acre), and moderate density residential (RES --1.0, 10 units per acre) uses. Petitioner's proposed project is cozasistent with the draft. Kona Regional Plan. 29. The Kailua--Eonal.a Urban Zone Map (Ordinance No. 74, 1967) zones the entire subject_ property as "Unplanned' with a minirallm lot size of Five acres, Petitioner must obtain a rezoning of the subject property. 30. T'ne- subject property is not situated within. either the Sneclal. Managment Area or the boundaries of the Kailua village SDecial District. I= NEED FOR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT 31. The draft Kona Regional Plata gooses three growth alternatives for Rona with C—Drresponding populaticn forecasts --For the period 1980-2000. The Population project -ons tO the Year 2000 are as follows: Alternative I: and Alternative 111: 45,300. 33,200; Alter �x �.--�e I f 3 ), 4()0; 32 [Frog these population projections ajid thte antici- pated decline in household size, the draft Kona, Regional Plan indicates future new housing requirements at betweell 5,24G to 9,91-5 units or a prQd:uct.ion rate of 262 to 9:96 units per annum for Kona. 33. In addition,1,580 units will reach obsolescence by the year 2000 and will meed to be replaced. PetitionerFs consul - tart assumes 40 of the above enumerated housing units reaching obsolescence will not be repaired. 34. Using the draft Kona Regional. Plan's estimates of new housing units required and the obsolescence factor developed by Petitioner's C011Sultat1t, the total number of new housing units needed for Dona ranges from 5,872 to 10, 547 units. 35. Pet: tionerls market study of 32 existing residential subdivisions of ten or fllorc� units in the North Kana area (as defined geographically by the market study) identified a total, of 4,5€ 0 existing residential lots. Of that total, 2,352 or 51% of the lots have houses built on thea and contribute to the existing :WE housing stock. The balance of 2,228 lots or 497 are vacant. In addition, only 345 vacant lots are for sale_ 3b. If all the existing vaunt lots counted izi the market study became available for housing by the year 2000, the current available inventory of finished lots represents between 217 and 38%' of the projected need. 37. Petitioner's market study estimates that 80 of the housing units needed for Kona will be built in: the area studied by Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as "study area"), which encompasses the Kailua-Kona-Kearuhou segement sof the draft Kona Regional Plan, prepared by the County of Hawa;.i's Planning Department, This amounts to between 4,698 to 8,437 units. IMPACTS ON THF, RESOURCES OF THE AREA Agricultural Resources 38. The State Department of Agriculture does not place the subject property in any of its important agricultural land categories in its A.LISE Maps for dearth Kona. 39. The Land Study Bureau's Detailed Land Classificatioxk Map for the Island of Hawaii indicates that two lard types, D293 and E295, are distributed across the subject property. The D and E ratings indicate that the lard is poorly or very poorly suited. for agricultural activities. 40. Although the subject property is currently used for cattle grazing, it does not have a high capacity for inten8ive. -1-0 agricultural use. Approximately 24 to 30 head of cattle are located on the subject property, 41. The draft Kona Regional Plane which was developed in consultation with farmers and gover mentai agencies concerned with agricultural activities, recommends that the subject property he used for residential purpo8es . Archaeological Resources 42. Cultural Surveys Hawaii conducted an archaeological reconnaissance in January of 1983. It discovered 47 archaeological sites on the subject property, same of which are merely remnants. 43. Based on preliminary observations, mane of the sites discovered are historically significant e cep -t. for research purposes . Petitioner will conduct further archaeological work as recommended by Cultural Surveys Hawaii, the State of Hawaii and the COlInty Cf Hawaii. Recreational Resources 44. Petitioner intends to develop a private recreation area for residents of the proposed development. PUBLIC SERVICES AND FACILITIES Fire Fighting and Police Services. 45. The COURtY of Flawaii Will provide police service from the Kona District. Headquarters ,located in Captain Cook. Fire Protection service will be provided by the County from its Kailua Fire Station located an Palani Road. -11- Schools 45 . students from the proposed project will attend the Kealakehe Elementary and Intermediate school (Grades K-8) and the Konawaena High School (Grades 9-12) . The, opening of the Kah3akai Elementary Schaal in September, 1982, which has a capacity of 670 students, alleviates the overcrowding at. Kealakehe Elementary and Intermediate school. The Kealakehe and Kahakai school facilities are 8xpected to meet the needs of the growing ;North Kana population for the next seven (7) years. The DOE plans -to construct additional school facilities at the Kealakehe Intermediate Schaal and the Konawaena nigh School during the late 198o, s in ordex to meet the needs of the residerkts of Petitioner's and other developments during the next 10 -year period_ Electrical Utilities Services; 47. Hawaii Electric & Light. Company, Inc. and Eawaii,an Telephone Company limes serge the area. Petitioner will provide all necessary service connection and transmission lines necessary to transmit electricity and other utilities to the development as may be required by applicable state and county regulations. Water 48. Petitioner does not have a water commitment from the Board of Waiter Supply for this project., but Petitioner is a participant in the Kona source Agreement 1 with the County develop - Ment cf Water Supply and other developers for development of new -12- domestic water scurc.es in Kona_ Petitioner has paid $125,004 as a contribution fear its prorata share for 500 watez units. 49. Should the exploratory activities conducted pursuant to the water agreement prove successful, Petitioner will execute a subsequent water source development agreement II and the Board of Water Supply will issue water commitments issued to participating developers, including petitioner. Drainage 50. Although approximately 75% of the subject property lies in the defined boundaries Of the Holualoa Drainage Basin, intermittent flooding is limited to the Horseshoe Bend and the Holualca School. Streams. Petitioner will build and dedicate to the County cif Eiawaii ail drainage facilities recommended in the Drainage Master Plan for the North Dona Flood Control project within the boundaries of the subject property. 51.. Properties located makai of the subject property (below Kuakini Highway) to the coastline -iav,� i�arious development approvals conditioned on the �g-uireneLit ttiat deve-lop- merit of tease projects may not commence unless the developers implement their portion of the drainage facilities recommended in. the Drainage Master Plan foo the Worth Kona Flood Control Project. 52. The development of the subject property and proper- ties located makai of the subject property will result in a -13- cortJ-Duous drainage system from tete mauka boundary of the subject property to the ocean. Sewage 'Treatment aiid Dis2osal Se_vic.es 53. PetlticTier proposes to dispose of sewage waste generated by the single-family residential area, by individual ces8POOls. Petitioner proposes that the multi -family residential area will be served: by private treatment plants. 54. Petitioner shall design and construct all sewage treatment facilities to satisfy tho requirements specified in Chapter 38, Public Health Regulations, State of Hawaii. S01id waste Disposal Services 55. The County of Hawaii does not provide refuse ccllection service. Petitioner will require purchasers to haul refuse to the Kona Sanitary Land Fill or maize arrangements with commercial disposal ser ice8. The landfill, which serves the North and 5ou°_'_i Konz cis-_icts, is located about four miles north of Kailua Village off of Queen Kaahumanu Highway.. 56. Tak;�, exi�tii�g lend fill has a life expectancy of approximately 10 yt.�ars . The County of Hawaii is planning to install a reuse s,-iredding facility to alleviate problems. Roadway and Hig{zway Services 57. he State Departn4ent of Transportation has approved tWO accesses from the proposed project to Kuakini highway. Petitioner proposes to connect present norti-i/south lateral road --14- system, specifically Kilohana, Leilani, and Pualani Streets to the proposed internal roadway system for the development. The lateral connections and intersection improvements would provide safer and more convenient ingress and egress to KuakiToL Highway for residents cf these adjacent subdivisions. 58. Petitioner an-ticipates t'; -,a` ra -ic r;et+ r Lrc h F the proposed project should be mitigated by the ce p'leticn Of` Whe Kuakini Highway realignment project whlc:h is t._ under constrtiic.. tion by the State of Hawaii and which State ezpcct`, o € omplete before the proposed project is completed. CONTIGUITY OF DEVELOPMENT 59. The subject property is contiguous to an urban District to the south which has been developed for low density residential. uses (Kalani Sunset, Leilani Sunset, and Kainana SiLbdivisi on.$) . The Kailua-Keauhou Middle Road (40 foot right- of-way) separates the siibject property from ars existing Urban District along pari_ of the subject property's makai (west) bound ry- CONFLst��tiCE WITH ST?`:I�DAFDS F)k 60. The c liara_,L.e. of _El__ac lint)` due to the- adjacent he adjacent residential s ihd1,71 si ons- located to the souLh o;: they subject property. In addition, proposed commercial development by Dillingham Investment Corporation on lands between Kuakini Highway and the subject propezty further amplify the 1°city like" character of the area. _15_ 61. 'the �:iz. Jr�v property is ceutrally located to established employment centers. It is € my 2 1/2 miles south of Kailaa Village and 4 miles north of the xeauhou resort. community_ Dillingham Investment Corporation has proposed to construct a shop- ping center and medical center oza nearby land already designated for commercial use. 62, Although the development of the subject property for residential use will not create permanent employment opportu- nities, the development of this project at a cost of $35 million will provide short-term emploFment opportunities for persnrls associated with the construction and real estate industries. 63.. lzecl&ssifi.catioli of the sabject property is reaso- nably necessary to accommodate urban growth projected for the. North, Kona area. 64. The subject property does not have any adverse geographic or topographic constraints which will hinder or endanger the proposed development. The proposed project will be designed and constructed -to be reasonably free from the danger of floods, tsunami, unstable sail conditions, and other adverse environmental effects. 65. The proposed development will not resin 1- in "Spo-ti, urban development because an existing Urba-z District which has been developed for low-density residential uses is located adjacent -16- to the subject property on the south and a Rural District, which permits the development of residential housing on half acre lots, is contiguous to they subject property on its east (mauka) boundary. 66. Petitioner will install all on-site utility lines, roads, sewage disposal, and water systems at no cost to the state or county governments. Petitioner will also construct and dedicate to the County of Hawaii a major drainage facility within the boundaries of its property. COMPLIANCE WITH THE KAwAII STAVE PLAN 67. Petitioner's proposed project is consistent with t.h wai- :;tate Plan's objectives and policies relating to pOF'Iati011, tie economy (general) , and housing. M R . VE'wTa i STRICTING 68. Fetitineer cannot complete full urban development of the subject property within five years from the date of. the COM17,issioza's approval of the redistricting; Petitioner proposes to develop the property in two increments, encompassing 5 years and 3 1/2 years. Petitioner will substantially complete development of the First 124.660 acre increment, consisting of the makai portion of the single-family residential area, all of the multi -family area, and all infrastructure systems within five yeari� . The second increment COrmisting of the Mauka portion of the single- family residential area, totalling 49 acres, is scheduled for completion within. 3 1/2 years thereafter. The descriptions of Increment I and Increment IZ of Petitioner's proposed development -17- are illustrated on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. Petitioner cannot start development on the second increment until development on all on-site and off-site improvements within Increment I have been substantially completed. RULING 4N PROPOSED FINDINGS' OF FAC"7 The Land Use Commission hereby rejects any of the proposed findings of fact submitted by the Petitioner or the ether parties not already ruled upon by adaption herein, or rejected by clearly contrary findings of fact herein.. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Pursuant to Chapter 205, Hawaii Revisers statues, as amended, and the Rule, of Practice .and Procedure and District Regulations of the Land Use Commisison, State of Hawaii, the Commission concludes that the reclassification of all of the lands within Increment Y, consisting of approximately 124.660 acres (as shown ori Exhibit A attached hereto), from the Agricultural to the Urban District and atne--j&ient, of the land -use district boundary to permit the development of increment, I is reasonable, in conformity with section 205-2, Hawaii Revised Statutes, and ins consistent with the Hawaii State Plan as set forth in. Chapter 226, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended., and the District Requ-1ations of the Land Use Conmiission. OF -00 The Commission further concludes that altlougb full development of the lands within Increment II (as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto) cannot he reasonably completed within five years from the date of the Commission's decision on this ratter, reclassification of the lands within lncreme.�t 1 T , consisting of approximately 49 acres, from the Agricultural to the Urban District and the amendment of the land use district boundary to Permit the development of Increment I1 is reasonable, in canfdrmity with Section 205-2, Hawaii Revised Statutes, and is consistent with the Hawaii State Flan, as set forth in Chapter 226, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended, and the District Regulations of the Land Use Commission. Ther fore, incremental red-Istricting of the lands within Increment TI of Petitioner's development is reasonable and warranted. DECISION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the lards within Increment I of Petitioner's development plan of the subject property, consist rLg of 124.660 acres, as depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, situated in the ahupual a of Holu.aloa first and Second, North Kona, County, Island and State of Hawaii, shall be and the same is hereby reclassified from the Agricultural to the Urban Distz i ct, and the district boundaries are ame .ided accordingly- -19- IT IS ALSO HEREBY ORDERED that the lands within Increment II of Petitioner's development plan of the subject property/consisting of approximately 49 acres, as depicted in Exhi_bi t A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, S�tiuitec in tn.e ahupua' a of Holualoa Fust and. Second, North Rana, Cou"Ly, I::l and and State of Hawaii, shall be and the same are hereby appi-oved for incremental development pursuant to State Land Use Commi ss ion r 4 District Reg klatioil 6-2, and that redistricting from the Agricultural to the Urbana District will be granted upon receipt of ars application by Petitioner for redistricting of Increment 11, and upon a prima facie showing by Petitioner that it has substantially completed the on-site and off-si4.e imurnveaten�s within, IncreDent i, in accordance wits �'e k: � t. i c:r«r_' � developme"nt plan as indic-ated above, within five yea.1_s of the date of this Order, including but not limited to partial satisfaction of the condition A below, to the extent of the number of lots W be developed in Increment I and full satisfaction of condition B below. IT IS FUR`T'I-ER HEREBY ORDERED that the reclassification and incremental districting of -the subject property shall he subject to the following conditions - A_ Petitioner shall provide housing opportunities for low and moderate income Hawaii residents prior tc assigning or transferring (except by way of mortgage or assignment as security) -2C_ its interest in the subject property, by offering for sale, on a. preferential basis, 022 its own or in cooperation with either or both the Hawaii. Housing Authority or the County of Hawaii, ten percent (10%) of the lots or house and lots to be developed can the subject property, to residents of the State of Hawaii of lour and moderate family income as dete rynined by the Hawaii Housing Authority or County of Hawaii from time to time. The preferential lots or Douses and lots shall be offered for sale at prices not exceeding prices that enable such purchasers to qualify for and obtain state -assisted .finar±ci.ng (i -e., Act 105 or Hula. Mae) or federally -insured or assisted financing (i.e., FHA Section 245 program) intended to encourage home ownership by low and moderate income families f and B. In making the ultimate decision as to whether a historical or archaeological. site is significant enough to warrant preservation, the Petitioner shall cor gult with and accept the decision of the Historic Preservation of. -,Firer of the Department of Land and Natural Resources; and C. Petitioner shall submit annual p.i.agress reports to the Commission, Department of Planning and Economic Development, and Hawaii County Planning department as to its progress in satisfying these conditions; and D. "these conditions may be fully or Partially released by the Commission as to all or any portion of the sub-ect pxoper- ties upon timely motion and prQvision of adequate of satisfaction of these conditions by the Petit-io'ner-. -21- DOCZET NO. AB3-549 - GAMLON CORP. Done at Honolulu, Hawaii, .his 13th day of December, 1983, per motions on December 1, 1983 anti December 13, 1983. LAND USE COMMISSION STATE OF HAWAII WILT) I �,7. L. YU C RTCHARD B, F. Vire Chairman B TiA,ti PE',TCF T' . CTIVI� C C 177.1 S^ i a n C. r T'5 F. fix'.; rT 7� y 3x" Luner d Corbinission %'7v%L e— -ic, T]-'OFTLO PEIL T7-u'!31AN CC[FJTJ -'siorer �PRT G PAMA Lf T R.E.F, F. P f CK T' 1' EI TEMORE � " r ,}�� �� �•'�. r r/ l' ..�M1��t ''r,YJ �r'y rprp � � ,. . L � .fir ti_ .+�f' '�•i.lJ + -fr f �4�"� � }fit 1p I •� � � �p. � r�� � 1 r+�L /'�{/ .. ''� 'r��r •� F; }''fir ■p�i�� It 7 iyrl'*ti .i* . � TSI. +� i �_ -'��5' � I� f��.'-'1ti' r`•'1 f' R �sFM� `_ Aj -i r ��' �,�,�{ _A r 5ti ; - { � : r 'I � y t 4+~� ' y . � . �rti ;• G - * t ■ ♦ L S � � �)� � ' : t; ,' p t iP i J i. p} `� � •i � • � �i #, � � , I •! I �, A i :ti. }, �r''� l4 ._'i+ � r .v �! v I � } k [�F^• 0 ly4p 'r • + w ,.' I I �•�i P J `Si�{��[Yy}1y...yr,,ppptttl�''r7r7r7��� ,�� .' v 'L � Y' '� � � i .tib �/s), �{ I(r _ �'• • • ' { si a } I g a ' • • pi i,. 1C '� �37 ++" r6+ T� , �L� ��fi �t- i � w �''+ y�rl - • h{ LZ_ ir/ r L i`L U ', 7't i� Jik i.f� r I ,� A '.6� F., 4}' �j�' _ *k r sT 7,' , , •*. LO il�f� 61Ly �+ 00 � 11 + �� � � f ,,�+k� � � 7 •'� �`i ' � J� •• r � i,'f � F ., f Y - / . r• r,_� �-_} i eeee���"' yl� � � 41 �y �� ; Pi �•:�, ,�.r ��t'�,C'�r, I � la' I' ,' Ly i �f r^ 1� � f / I � � - -k +� � fir. 1 t �� �4 hr, " i yam` i� i �. .F f rte• { l I •L {f L rj�; r ..';.��•'i4�--+°�'�_ �� � �' ��I ��i".'�u -,��+ lam' �• J .�� �. 4 - } • ,,''I.%f��'+'�'-f,�3 li����C�i�1•,: lrr if 'I�:�11iff �, +i��yY y'�� � ��� ..- . .,- � rr � r�, '.' r' � I.,�r� iII�. �w1 '�,.' ; h ti'• f I j 4•, ' I , �� rr � / J%ff}fI a'; '-• �7`� - � ,k'�� . � f�-, `�, � � ii ; M1 � _+ • k('ry �� '��j f'f�,�� i � ��'�.�t�'� '���Y` � fl'*y{4R� '+J �l ', t k, +p , 1 • a: t�' '" # l rf '��jI g . _ rlf ++� ire ��.a`i ��" C`f� 1•.'r rk r•',�Y � � � a'I ,.�4 �� ' � ✓ rr�-��r -- F 1 -"'y.4 .. .; �'-��.++ 1. • wr f + 's 1 4 t .1 714 I i, , .s til ` _ .4 r , � � '` �, ~•'+�-- -�- �� '� ;+ °� �`} I � � � . 4 � � ? — ' BEFORE THE LAND USE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII In the Matter of the Petition of GAMON CORP. . For Amendment of District Boundary and Declassification of Ce-rtain Lands gitue�-ed at. North Kona, County, Island and State of Hawaii CERTITFICATE OF SERVICE DOCKET NO. A83-549 CAMLON CORP. I hereby certify that a cePy of the Land Use Commission's Decision and Order was served upon the following by either hand delivery or depositing the same in the U. S. Postai. Service by certified mail: RENT M. KEITH, Director Department of Planning and Economic DeveloPment state of Hawaii 250 South King Street Honolulu, Hawaii 96313 SIDNEY F'UKE, Planning Director planning Departltent County of Hawaii 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, Hawaii 96724 RICHARD G. ACMTLLA-N KARL K. KOBAYASHI The Queen Street Building 345 Queen Street, Suite 800 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, this 25th day of Jamiar-y, :1984. BEFORE THE LAND USE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII In the Matter of the Petition a GAMER, INC. To Amend the Agricultural Land � Usn District Boundary into t1le j Urban Land Use, District for j Incremental Redistricting of j I-acrement 11 For Approxin. atej y } 49 Acres of hand at North Kora, } County, Island and State of: Hawaii,) Tax Map Key No.. (Third Division) } 7-6-21i15 and portions of 41 9, ) 10, 11 and 17. ) DOCKET No. A63-549 CA- REX, INC. `� itil�i I 1 LLV 4ri;G fi� � '� i.}17:} �ti� iJ YY 4=47 §�.6f+KAs 4iSrl �4r �i MAY I by „w. _ m -.Az- F.T.N111NCS OP F -?1CT, - �+ Ct)TdC'I,1.: 1C '; UF' 1' AWS AND AiwD ORDFR 6 :3'-�; BEFORE THE LAND USE COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF HAWAII Tn thca ?jrrt=ter.' of the Petition of C�'- 4 EX, !NC, To A nend I �� AF.fr r,": ] t_t: r a L -_,and Use Distr; rft_ 5,)LJTrd,.2,ry into the Urban Land ilt,ri D: "tr. ict for Incre-mental Red+4tricting— ol- 49 Acres r.)f Land at No tti Kona, County, Island and St_at.{ `Fax Map ' cy Nc. _ (Thi rd Division) 7-6-21:15 and nortior_t! o 10, 11 and 1.. DOCKET NO. A83-549 GAMRRX, INC. k-TNDThC l PF—FAC-17, C'ONCLUti1CNS CF 1.AW 1 ANT)[ EMISION kUT) ORDFR Cid-1REX, INC. , a Hawaii vu-Lp:)i:ctt.ion, as succe;�2 aQr in interest to Ralott Properties, Inc. and Gamlon Corp., (hereinafter "Petitioner") filed on June 4, 1992, FA Motion to Approve Redistricting of Increment II, pursuant to Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statutes, (hereinafter "MRS") and Section 15-15-78, Hawaii Administrative Rules, (hereinafter "Commission Mules"), to amend approximately 49 acres of land in the Agricultural District to the urban District at North Kana:, County, island and State of Hawaii, 'Pax Map Key No. (Third Division) 7-6-21:15 and portions of parcels 4, 9, 10, 11 and 17 (hereinafter "Increment II'") , and comprising the second increment of lands described in the Land Use Commission's (hereinafter "Commission"} Decision and order dated December 13, 1983, (hereinafter "Order") in the Petition by Gamlon Corp. in this docket. The Commission, hawing heard and examined the testimony, evidence and argument of the parties, the Petitioner's Prognosed Findings of Faot, Conclusions of Law, and Decision and {order, and the parties' stipulation tiled thereto, does hereby zna:ke the following Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and ©ecision and Order, FINDINGS OF FACT PROCEDURAL MAT'T'ERS 1. The Motion to Approve Redistricting Qf Increment II and Memorandum in support of Motion was filed on June 4, 1992, by Petitioner to reclassify Increment 11, con;ist ng of approximately 49 acres of land in the Agricultural District to the Urban District for ce.rtair land situated at forth Kona, County, Island and State. of Hawaii. 21 On June 12, 1992, petitioner filed a MDtion to Approve Change of Fame of Petition from Gamlon Ccsrp. to Gai:rew, Tnc. 3. On August 3, 1992, Petitioner filed i:s List of witnesses and List of Exhibits, together with Exhibit Acis. 1 through 5. These exhibits were subsequently withdrawn by Petitioner. oner. 4. A prehearing conference was held on August 11, 1992, at the conference roam of the DepartTnent of Business, Economic Development and Tourism, 11th Floor, Central Pacific Plaza, 220 South King Street, in Honolulu with the Petitioner -2 - and the Office of State Planning present. The County of Hawaii Planning Department was flat present. At the prehearing conference, witness and exhibit lists, and exhibits were exchanged among the parties present. 5. On August 19, 1992, Petitioner filed its Supplemental Memorandum ill Support of dation to Approve Redistricting of Increment II. 5. On August 19, 1992, Petitioner filed its Revised ;Gist of Witnesses, Revised List of Exhibits, and Exhibit Nos. 1 to 15. 7. On August 27, 1992, Petitioner filed a Motion to Continue Lotion to Approve Redistricting of increment TI. S. The Connission held a hearing on August 27, 1992, at the Kamakahonu Ballrooms, King Kamehameha Kana. Beach Hotel, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii pursuant to notice published in the Honolulu Advertiser, Hawaii Tribune -Herald and West Hawaii Today on July 1.7, 1992. At the hearing, the Commission approved Petitioner's Motion to Approve Change of Name of Petition and Petitioner's Motion to Continue Motion to Approve Redistricting of Increment 11. 9. Ori January 21, 1993, Petitioner filed its Second Revised Lists of Witnesses, Second Revised List of Exhibits, and Exhibit Nos. 17 to 2D. 10. On January 21, 1993, Petitioner filed its Second Supplemental, Memorandum in Support of Motion to Approve Redistricting of Increment 11. -2 11. On January 28, 1933, Petitioner filed its Third Revised List of Witnesses, Third Revised List of Exhibits, and Exhibit Nor. 21 and, 22. 12. Tho Co=ission held a continued hearing an the Motion to Approve Redistricting of Increment IT on January 28, 1993, at the Xamakahonu Sallroams, King Kamehameha Kana Beach Hotel., Kailasa-Kana, Hawaii. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 13. The subject property was approved for incremental dis-triQting by the Commission is order dated December 130 1933t and consists sof approximately 173.66 acres, at North Kana, County, Island and State of Hawaii, Tax Map Xey Plus. (Third Division) 7-6-21.:4, 9, 10, 1.1, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 1.7 (hereinafter the "Property"). 14. Increment I, approved by the Commission's Order dated December 13, 1983, consists of approximately 124.66 acres (hereinafter "Increment 1"}, and Increment IT consists of approximately 49 acres. 15. The Property is bound to the north by undeveloped lands, the south by the Kal.ani Sunset, Loilani sunset and. Kainana Subdivisions, the west by the old Railua-Keauhou Middle Road, and the east by the Talani Subdivision. Increment II is generally located in the eastern portion of thy? PL-oporty. 16. The Property is awned in fee by Fetitioner. 1.7 By Circler dated December 13, 1983, the Cc=issicn reclassified from, the Agricultural District to the Urban -4 - District on an increzental basis approximately 1,24.66 acres of land comprising Increment I. Pursuant, to ,Section 15-15-78 of the Commission Pales, and the above-mentioned Ordex' dated December 13, 1981, Petitioner may apply to reclassify Incarement 11 from the Agricultural District to the Urban District upon a prima facie showing by Petitioner that it has substantially completed the on and off site improvements within Increment I, in accordance with the approved development plan for Increment 1. 18. On November 16, 1988, Petitioner filed a Motion to Extend Time to Complete Substantial Development of Increment 1 and to Apply for Incremental Districting of Increment Il with the Commission. 19. The Ca-aunission approved the Motion to Extend Time t.,) 3•.I�Dstantial Development of Increment I and to Apply for T ? r. rn7er� �a.1 Districting of Increment II per motion on J�.izni z -y 10, 19 9 and subsequently by Decision and order dated Yehrzi,ary _1:.�, 1989. The time limit was extended until D^ocmber 13, 1993. Y OVFJ4FMS COMPLETED WITHIN INCREMENT r 20. After Increment I was reclassified to the Urban District by the Commission by its Order dated v comber 13, 1983, tie following approvals affecting increment I have been processed by the County of Hawaii: -5 - a. County of Hawaii incremental zoning approval pursuant to County of Hawaii Ordinance Nos. 54-23, 84-42, 89-4, 90-62 and 91-96 ("Zoning ordinance"). b. County of Hawaii's final subdivision approval for County of Hawaii Subdivision Units I -A and I -B which consists of single-family residential areas in Increment I. Petitioner has also received County of Hawaii preliminary subdivision approval for County of Hawaii Subdivision Unit. I -C.. 21. The on-site improvements which have been substantially completed, or in progress to date within Increment I aro a follows; a. Tr"Provements for Units I -A and I -B. All infrastructure improvements, including roads, water system, electrical system, and {e-lephcne transmission system, within the portion of Increment T which comprises County of Hawaii subdivision Units I --A and I -B have been completed. b. Inproyements for Unit I -C. Roads and utilities are partially completed within County of Hawaii subdivision unit I -C. C. Drainaqe system for m0t'i-fami1Vresidential _ area. The construction of the drainage syst_en for the multi- family residential. areas has been delayed because: (a) petitioner did not control the lards below {ween Naahumanu Highway which the Counter of Hawaii deterr;ined were needed to complete the portion of the Holualoa drainage systen running through Petitioner's property, and (b) the County of Hawaii has r, 17. r•�-A Petitioner to participate in certain. flood studies and i_ pro-�,,cr- rets fe)r the area below Queen Kaahumanu Highway. 1n J-jnc� of 1909, Petitioner completed the purchase of a 3_2 -acre parol (Tax Map Hey No. (Third Division) 7-6-24;25) Lo,��ated west (makai) of Queen Kaahnmanu Highway, at a cast of $1,000,000 to resolve a problem concerning the const uction of its portion of the Holualoa drainage system which portion runs mainly through the multi -family residential areas within Increment 1. All flood studies have been completed and have been submitted to the County of Hawaii Uepartmo-nt of Public Warks, which will submit them to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (hereinafter "FEMA"). Upon approval by FEMA, Petitioner will be permitted to construct its portion of the Ho ualca drainage system. After completion of the drainage system, the County of Hawaii will permit construction of the infrastructure improvements within the multi. -family residential areas within Inc_,remenr i. d. Lra � na 1e System f 0r Unit I -C. petitioner, in. connection with a_k jacLL ALL 1,inJowrrers and the Coianty of Hawaii, have completed a study for the drainage system, which affects only a small partion of County of Hawaii subdivision unit 1-c. After approval by the FEMA, the drainage system which affects Unit l -C will �,c completed and Petitioner will complete the infrantruc�tu.re Lmproveiients within Unit 1-C. After completion of such improverfle-nts, ;l0l. of the infrastructure improvements _7 within the single-family areas within Increment I will have been completed. e. Infrastructure Improvements for Multi -Family Residential Area within Increment I. The water system master plan for the area requires Petitioner to develop the water system and other infrastructure improvements within Increment II prior to development of infrastructure improvements in the multi -family residential areas within Increment 1. f. Model Homes and Recreation Center. Petitioner has completed eight model homes and a recreation center within Increment 1. 22. `1le off-site improvements which have been substantially completed or in progress to date within Increment I are as follows: a. Petitioner has ccnpleted construction of the main access road from Kuakini Highway to the project which is the Laky Street extension. Petitioner has also completed construction of the Lako Street/Kuakini Highway intersection. b. Off-SiteDrainage. e. Petitioner has submitted drainage plans for the 12 -acre parcel of land located west (makai) of Queen Kaahumanu Highway (Tax Map Key No. (Third Division) 7-6-24:25) and these plans are currently being reviewed by the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works and FEMA. Petitioner is also participating in flood (HEC2) studies for the area west (makai) of the 12 -acre parcel and these -8 - studies have been submitted to the County of Hawaii Department of Public Works and FEMA. 23. Total casts, including on and off ---site improvement costs, expended by Petitioner is approximately $20,000,000. 24. Due to the existing water system for the area, Petitioner cannot construct any additional water system and ether infra8trucfture improvements in Increment I without urban districting of Increment 1.1 and cannot proceed with further development of the multi -gamily residential areas within Increment I without such urhar, redistricting of Increment 11. 25. The County of Hawaii will allow Petitioner to c:.onsf_"c=t the water systen and ether infrastructure improveir,ents wi.th:i n Increment 11 subject to subsequent adjustmstnts, r�!-al.ignlnents, or ether revisions to such infrastructure imrrovemgnt:�; as may be required by the county of Hawaii zoning and sdbdivisia l process. 25. Petitioner has a].ready commenced preparation of plaits for the c:onstzuct_;c):r ol'. improvements within Increment II in order that it carr proceed with such construction without delay if tie Comwi.ssion approves PPt.lti cnex's regta.est for redistricting of Incare;nent II. 27. Ba.p ed on the a fortis a id findings, and the findings in the Commission's Order filed December 13, 198 in this docket, the proposed reclassification of Increment 11 conforms, with the fallowing objeQtives, policies and priorities of the M� F'awaii State plan provided under HHS §§226-19(a)(1), 226-19(b)(1), and 226419(b)(3). 28. The Commission, by Order dated December 13, 1983, impc�zed the following conditions on the reclassification and increiio rnt;al districting of the Property: A. Petitioner shall provide housing opportunities for low and moderate income Hawazi residents prior to assigninq or transferring (except by way of mortgage or assignment as security) its interest in the subject property, by offering for sale, on a preferential basis, on its own or in cooperation with either or bath the Hawaii Housing Authority or the County of Hawaii, ten percent (ID%) of the lots or house and lots to be developed on the subject property, to residents of the State of Hawaii of low and moderate family income as determined by the Hawaii Housing Authority or County of Hawaii from time to time. The ,prefer erre i t3 l lots or houses and lots shall he offered. for 8a1e, [it_ prices not exceeding prices that enable such purchasers to qualify for and obtain state-asszsted financing (i -e-, fact 205 or Hula Mae) or federally -insured or assisted fin,-Inc?inq (ie., FHA Section 245 program) intenJed to encourage hone ownc rship by low and moderate income families (hereinafter "CondiLion All); and A. In making the ultimate deci-sion as to whether a historical or arc h�-.ie.c,l ogi.cr_l sit.; i �i gnific:ant enough to warrant Uie Petitioner shall consult with and accept the decision of the Historic Preservation Officer of the Department oaf Land and Nati.--al esraurce,7; (bereinafter "Condition B")t and C. Petitioner shall submit annual progress reports to the Commission, Department of Pl , r n i.ny Lind Economic Development, and the Hawaii Coi:.nty Planning Department as to its progress in satisfying these uun3 itions (hereinafter "Condition C111. 29. Petitioner has addressed. Condition A by entering into an agreement with the County of Hawaii Housing Department providing for conveyance of the 12 -acre parcel, Tax Map Ivey No. (Third Div-1sion) 7-6-241.25, to the County of Hawaii, in satisfaction of the affordable housing requirement. -14- has addressed Condition E by receiving approval of its report from the. State Historic Preservation Division of the Department of Land natural Re:z7r.,r.-c1,,� , 31. Petitioner has addressed CoDdi.tion C by u}��r.i i,ezti of Exhibit A to its Second Supplemental Mc orand.um filed January 21, 1993, which the Commission accepted. as Petitioner's Annual .Report for 1992, and having filed previous annual. reports with appropriate parties. RBLZNG ON PROPOSED FINDINGS 4F FAC`` Any of the proposed findings of fact submitted by the Petitioner or other parties not already ruled upon by the Commission by adaption herein, or rejected by clearly contrary findings of fact herein, are hereby denied and rejected. Any conclusion of law herein improperly designated, as finding of fact should be deemed or construed as a conclusion of 'law; any finding of fact herein improperly designated as a conclusion, of lair should he deemed and construed as a finding of fact. CONCLUSIONS CE LAW Pursuant to Chapter 205, HRS, and the Commission Ryles including Section 15-15-78 thereof, the Commission finds upon a preponderance of evidence that the incremental redistricting of lands within :increment 11 of tha Property, and approximately shown on Exhibit A attached hereto arra incorporated herein by reference, consisting of approximately 49 acres of land situate -11- at North Kona, County, Island and State of Hawaii, identified as Tax Map Key No. (third Division) 7-6-21:1.5 and partions of parcels 4, 9, 10, 11 and 17 from, the Agricultural District to the Urbdn District, subject to the additional conditions providod in this Order, conforms to the standards established in the Commission Rules including Section 15-15-78 relating to incremental districting, is reasonable, non --violative of section 205-2, HRS, and is consistent with the Hawaii State Plan as set forth in Chapter 24 HRS. DRC'lSION AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the lands within Increment 11 of the Property, consisting of approximately 49 acres situate at North Kona, County, Island and State of Hawaii, more particularly identified by Tax Map Xey No. (Third Division) 7-6-21:15 and portions of parcels 4, 9, 10, 11 and 17 and approximately shown in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, for i.ncrernental redistricting from the Agricultural District to the Urban District shall be and the same is hereby approved, and the district boundaries are amended accordingly, subject to the following additional conditions: 1. Petitioner shall develop the Property in substantial compliance with the ropre,4entations made to the Commission. Failure to so develop th(x iaay re-,u:lt in reversion of the Property to its former or change to a more appropriate ci ass i. f i cats i on . -12- .Ion er shall give notice to the Comm issicn of any intent to sell, lease, assign, place in trust, or otherwise voluntarily alter the ownership interests in the Property, prior to development of the Property. 3. Petitioner shah, provide annual reports to the La -ad Use Commission, the Office of State. Planning, and the County of Hawaii Planning Department in connection with the status of the subject project and the p'etitioner's progress in complying with the conditions imposed, 4. The Land Use Commission may fully or partially release these conditions as to all or any portions of the Property upon timely motion and upon the provision of adequate assurance of satisfaction of these conditions by Petitioner. 5. Petitioner shall record the conditions imposed by the Commission with the Bureau of Conveyances pursuant to Section 1.5-1.5-92, Hawaii Administrative Mules.. 5, Within T days of the issuance of the co77i_o7.ion's Decision and. Order for the subject recla gification, P�� i�icsrr�r shall (a) record with the Bureau of Conveyances a Statemen to the effect that the Property is subject to condit.ians imposed by the Land Use Commission in the reclassification of the Property, and (b)shall file a copy of such recorded statement with the Commission. -13- DOCKET NO. A33-549 - GAMREX, INC., a Hawaii corporation Dore at Honolulu, Hawaii, this I.0th clay of May 1993, per motion on April 29, 1993. LAND USE COMMISSION STATE OF HAWAII By Chairman nd C-emmissioner By (ab Ent ) KART': S. r.:iN Vice Chairperson and Commissioner By JOA N. MATTSON Vice Chairpe son and commissioner By KT /In �-1C i1 r Her EUSEBTC Tl�.PENTA, JR. commissioner. By (absents) RENTON L K. X411:1 Coram i Ss i-on0r BY �J��jj 1'-' awjos;�' TRUDY K SENUA Commis iorIer Filed and effective on B _ May 10 , 1993 ELTON WADA cCJIiIk11:: r_: nnor Certified by: �- Executive Officer 13Y €SFT IOND J. H. 1rrr�Ci w];;l'111�=5143?lw � -14- DOCKET NO. A83 - 549 / GAMREX. INC a Hawaii Corporation L 0 C A T 1 0 N M A P TAX MAP KEY: 7 6 -'21. pur. 4, por por. 10. par it, por. 17 & 15 HOLIJALOA LST & 2ND. NORTH KONX, HAWAII SCALE: I" = 2,000 fl - ± APPROVED AREA i INCREMENT 111 K011 A Ff AM AKUA n ill].() � KONA PUN K A Q? HAWAII BEFORE THE LAND USE COMMISSION 01' SHE STATE OF HAWAII -n tie Yattex of the Petition of f.xAb`RE.X, lNC. To Amend the Agriciiltllraf Lane CJ e iii t:r_i. t ECIZad—dry into the Urban Land Use Dist.ri-:t fir Increrental Redistricting of Increment SI For Approx.imatsly 49 Ages of Land at North Kana, County, Island and State of-Jawaii, Tax Mag Key No.: (Third Division) 7-6--21:15 and portions of 4, 9, 10, 11 and 1-7. DOCKRT NO. A83-549 GAMREX, INC. CFRT'IFICATE OF .SERVICE I li�,-rehy Certify that a copy of the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Latia, and Decision and order way verve.. lanon the following by el i the tiarxd del. i_vei�y Or repos ` t J ng the same in tne. U. S. Postal Service I.Dy Trail: HAROLD S. MASUMOTO, Director office of State Planning P. D. Box 0543 Honolulu, Haw,�i.ii. 96811-3540 3540 VIEGT"iT.A GGLDS'I'EIN, Plar.r.-ina Director CERT. Planning Dep--tn,.nt, (-c-urtv ref i nwiii.i ?S A. puna. Street. Hilo, Hawaii -,- KARL K. NOBAY-ASHI, ESQ., Attorney fcr Pet.it.jCD :er CERT. Carlsmith Ball W4Lctllr an N'urray Case t.tk & IchikJ 22010 Pacific Tower 1001 Bishop Street Honulula, Hawaii 96813 DATED; Honolulu, Hawaii, this 10th day of May 1993. Executive of= i cer BTT -,L NO. 1075 COUNTY OR HAWAII - STATE GR HAWAII ORDINANCE NO. Isis 23 AN t'WI)INANCE AMENDIN�a sH:c,r10N 25-87 (NORTH KONA ZONE MAF} ARTICLE 3, t:eiF iE�.t 25 (ZONING COIF.) OF THE HAWAIY COUNTY CODE, BY CHANGING THE Di4'1'RiCT CLASSIFICATION FROM UNPLANNED (U) TO MOLTIPLE FA-MTLY (RM -5) AND FAMILY RES11)F'.NTIAL (RS -15) AT 130LUALOA I AND 2, NORTH f+;ON,L., HAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 7-6-21:4, 9-13, AND 15-17. BES IT 0:xDATNED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Section 25-87, Article 3, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) et : I:e 1 ,9:ti3i i kCou sky "'OdE', i� to change the distriot pr.-)pr,rty described hereinafteas follows : r : lh�- distr.ict cls:,,. i.fic ti n of the following area situated at. Fi()l La.loa 1 E317`j 2, '_at_�rtkt T{c lar Hawaii, shall be Multiple F'aMiIy -4r 5i deF,tial (PAirCEL 1) Beginning at the northwest corner of this parcel of land and on the northeasterly side of Kuakini Highway Real ion Tirnt, Project No. 11A-03-69, the coordinates of said point Of 0.:'_:a iryry i t1c� referred to Government Survey Triangulation St,)t. i on 1'1,;'"..TTJJA,P' being 9,193.71 feet South and 8,705.53 feet I' A:1rsinq by azimuths measured clockwise from true South. 1.. 2400 281 2. 2550 18` 3. 3110 55, 30" 2,903.35 feet along the t e_Ir,.], 5:3. t of R.P. 4475, I,.C. '1w. 1713, Ap. 43 to Vi< tori a Kamamalu; 17.97 feet. along Same; 219.92 feet along same; 4. 3310 14` 15" 143.36 feet along same; Thence along Stream Lot 14 for the next thirteen (13) courses, the direct azimuths and distances being: 5. 960 54' 67.99 feet; 6. 1120 56' 86.79 feet; 7. 900 55' 56.48 feet; S. 690 49' 76.70 feet; 9. 460 39' 114.37 feet; 10. 510 06' 83.31 deet.; 11. 760 01' 139.84 feet; 12. 510 29' 175.76 feet; 13. 660 32' 91.49 feet; 14. 440 49' 170.06 feet; 15. 250 59' 247.57 feet; 16. 370 21' 124.60 feet; 17. 310 20' 30" 825,56 feet; Terence along Stream Lot 15 for the next test (10) courses, the azimuths and distances being: 18. 370 01' 57.76 feet; 19. 660 24' 138.13 feet; 20. 440 01' 114.46 feet; 23. 670 01' 134.84 feet; 22. 1.020 13' 107.13 feet; 23. 690 30' .139.97 feet; 24. 310 40' 114.38 feet; 25. 880 52' 64.54 feet; 26. 1144 04' 60.04 feet; 27. 770 28' 132.01. feet; -2- 28. 1520 18' 10" 29. 1390 59' 30" 30. 990 48' 30" 31. 1540 1.1 " 95.72 feet along Kuakini. Highway Realignment Project, No. 11A-03-69; 20.75 feet along sane; 35.58 feet along same 557.05 feat alo.n-i same to the point of beginning and containing ars area of. 37.936 Acres. (Peter to Parcel 1 as }hewn on Exhibit ) The di,stri.ct classification of the following area situated at fiolualoa 1 and 2, North Kona, Hawaii, shall he multiple Family Residential (RM-5) (PARCEL 2) 13eginning at the southeast corner of this parcel of land, being the northeast corner of Stream Lot 15, the coordinates of said point of beginning referred to Governmernt Survey Triangulation Station "KA11,11A?" being 9,5b5.90 feet South and 11,749.51 feet East, thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from true South: Along Stream Lot 1.5 for the next thirteen (13) courses, the direct azimuths and distance: being 1. 650 05' 2.53 feet; 2. 981) 56' 1.51 . X37 feet; 3. 1210 57' 191.39 feet; 4. 950 15' 205.20 feet; 5. 960 50' 273.37 feet; 6. 740 55` 1:32.84 feet; 7. 1070 39' 54.73 feet; S. 900 53' 191.87 feet; 9. 1.290 17' 56.53 Eeet; 10. 800 07` 71.22 feet; -3- 11. 531D 36' 104.76 feet; 12. 031) 27' 205.32 feet; 13. q 08' 104.72 feet; Thence along StLot !4 for t-h�-- next thirteen (1.3) courses, the direct azimuths and ;,ei.ng: 14. 2110 20t 3011 753.45 feet; 15. 2170 2[11 1y27.42 feet; 1.6. 2050 59' 243.59 feet; 17. 2240 491 148.50 feet; 1{8• 2466' B7.91 feet.; 19. 231D X321 29' .170.64 feel.; 20. 2560 all l 4:]. Cly} feet; 21. 2310 06' 95.89 feet; 22. 226° 39' 104.41 feet; 23. 2490 49' 53.22 feet; 24. 2700 55' 33.64 feet; 25. 27*9�20 56' feet; 26■ 276° 54' [8f3.5y7 0.29 feet; 27. 354' 02' 55.41 feet along remainder }iL.C.e7 of R.P. 4475, Aw. 1713, Age. 43 to Victoria Kamamalu; 28. 211' 41' 50" 8.50 feet along same; 29. 3591) 37' 20" 20.09 feet along same; 3€7. 51) 07' 20" 44.89 feet along the remainder of R.P. 4475, L.C. Aw. 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria Kamamalu and along the remainder of R.P. 8217, L.C. Asir. 3660 to .Joan P. IJunn; -4- 31. 3550 00' 65.72 feet along the remainder of R.P. 8217, T.C. Aw. 3560 to John P. Munn and along the remainder of R.P. 4475, L.C. Aw. 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria Kamamalu; 32. 30 05' 265.06 feet along the remainder of R.P. 4475, L.C. AW. 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria Kamamalu; 33. 770 08, 20.55 feet along same; 34. 40 39, 203.73 feet along same; 35. 3470 0 2 r ].87.60 feet along same; 36. 3370 00' 679.20 feet along same to the point of beginning and containing an area of 30.901 Acres. (Refer to Parcel 2 as shown on Exhibit A) The district classification of the following area situated at Holualoa 1 and 2, North Kona, Hawaii, shall be Single Family Residential (RS -15) (PARCEL 3) Beginning at the southwest corner of this parcel of land and on the easterly side of Kailua•-Keauhota Middle Road, the coordinates of said point of beginning rcferzed to Government Survey Triangulation Station "KAILUA, " being l2, 047.12 feet South and 11,089.83 feet Fast, tha0ce running by azimuths measured clockwise from true South! ALong Xailua-Keauhou Middle Road for the next thirty-six (35) courses, the direct azimuths and distances being: 1. 1720 541 3041 186.38 feet; 2. 1770 19' 91.93 feet; 3. 1670 17' 30" 51.67 feet; 4. 1850 12' 69.99 feet; 5. 1920 52' 74.50 feet; _S_ 6. 1730 31' 30" 20.57 feet; 7. 1510 40' 30" 49.48 feet; 8. 1410 33' 41.74 feet; 9. 1280 061 53.19 feet; 10. 1350 52' 140.78 feet; 11. 1240 23' 30" 65.66 feet; 12. 11/30 37.19 feet; 13. 1190 X181 1)71 " 30 50.14 feet; 14. 1110 131 30" 24.45 feet; 15. 1Q7e 1.51 148.48 feet; 15. 1020 131 70.44 feet; 17. 1121D 58' 94.72 feet; 18. 1150 15' 30" 3.78.23 feet; 19. 1210 061 87.41 feet; 20. 11.14 55' 32.57 feet; 21. 1ICcl 49' 30" 55.63 feet; 22. 1010 37' 24.92 feet; 23. 1040 38' 30" 35.05 feet; 24. 1020 571 30" 40.04 feet; 25. 1120 43' 30" 58.53 feet; 26. 1420 40' 32.94 feet; 27. 950 37' 30" 32.48 feet; 28. 10411 23' 85.44 feet; 29. 910 43' 44.66 feet; 30. 990 lis' 30" 25.27 feet; 31. 1120 14' 66.03 feet; -6- 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. 1170 1.250 134o 1340 1340 1540 51 07' 374 37' O0' 11' 38. 24 V 28' 39. 1500 28' 30" 31.69 feet; 51.13 43.90 feet; 30" 40.62 feet; 3011 41..48 feet; 30" 47.64 feet; 43. 400.86 feet along Kua, i;)i 203.93 feet; Highway Real i-.-jiiinent, 2860 30' Project No. 1.1.A-03-59: 30" 1,332.99 feet along tele remainder 11' 352.71 of R -P1 447 ,, L.C. Aw. 46. 1750 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria 185.94 feet; Kamamalu (Lot 4); 30" 337.56 Feet along same, Thence along Stream Lot 15 for the next ten (10) courses, the direct azimuths and dxstancos being: 40. 2330 35' 51.13 feet; 41. 2600 07' 25.64 feet; 42. 3090 17` 85.97 feet; 43. 270" 53' 203.93 feet; 44. 2860 30' 113.50 feet; 45. 2670 11' 352.71 feet; 46. 1750 15' 185.94 feet; 47. 3010 57' 189.37 fleet; 48. 2780 56, 182.35 feet; 49. 2450 05' 1.0.28 feet; 50. 3450 30' 902.50 feet along the remainder of R.P. 4475, L.C. AW. 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria Kamamelu and along the remainder of Grant 3630 to W. R. Cornwell; -7- 51. 3340 30' 969.30 feet along the remainder of R.P. 4475, L.C. Aw. 7713, ADZ. 43 to victoria KainamaIu; 52. 20 00, 537.04 feet along carne; 53. 860 511 30" 120.13 feet along Grant 988 to xamala; 54. 930 48' 45.22 feet along same; 55. 840 14' 1.06.16 feet along Same; 56. 1040 06' 30" 41.60 feet along lanae; 57. 770 41' 301' 76.19 feet along Grant 988 to Kamalo and along Grant 1591 to Hoolawaihonua; Thence along Grant 1591 to Haolawaihan0a for the next nine (9) courses, the direct azimuth, and distances being: 58. 820 34' 126.79 feet 59. 1420 51' 32.62 feet; 60. 810 37' 106.15 feet; 61. 670 57' 301, 30.29 feet; 62. 830 03" 30" 258.61 feet; 63. 720 49' 30"" 90.07 feet; 64. 840 37' 30" 76.23 feed.; 65. 780 08' 62.37 feet; 66. 820 02' 30" 157,05 feet to the point of beUi nning and containing ars area 0f 103.293 }Acres. (Refer to Parcel 3 as gh'7wn on Exhibit A) All as shown 0n the map attached - acKej Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. SECTION 2. These changes in district classification are conditioned upon the following: (A) The ening for the property shall be effective only after: (1) there are assurances satisfactory to the Departments of Water Supply .arid Planning, upon consultation with the State Depaz: t; raent oi•= Health, and the Division of water and Land t7ev l.o, ment of the Mate Departments of Land and Natural Resoorces, that a water source of sufficient quality and gztr-irrtity has been established within two years from the efi'r cat ve date of this ordinance; provided that a maximum one-year e t_t�nsion to the twos --year time limit may be granted by the Planning Director with reasonable and sufficient j,ist if_ icat ion; and (2) an agree --rent, ,Wit.{�ompanied by an appropriate surety bond or other acccnt_able security, is c}iodated with the Department of War, ­r �i,n_nly for the actual development of a proven water source and .its wat_ec transmiSSiGn arta distribution system within one. vc:a= Lr�):u the official date of compliance with condition A (l) ; �)ro j ld"d that a one-year exten=.ion to the one --year tiiik. , 1_:idt ray L�e granted by the Planning Director with reaso:iablQ and sufzi.cient justification; or (3) the Department of Wa-�r Suppler issues a water commitment for the proposed devel[7pTw'2ttt; (B) No subdivision or developm-:�.tt of any portion of the land shall occur unless and until A h.�is been complied with; (C) The Planning Director shall be m.3ndatpsi `.c in"- -'ate act can foo the repeal of this ordinance if conditions A ur B Macre not been complied with; (D) The petitioner, its assigns or successors, shall he responsible for complying with all conditions of approval; (E) The zoning for the 49+ acres designated by the State Land Use Commission as its second zoning in remenL shall nat became effective until that land is certf )_ ed by that commission to be within the Urban District; (F) The RS zoned area stall he developed in ,_w!) The first increment shall consist of a Maximum f [°. + c:rat�tlgl�ctu acres, and the second, the rewaining area. '_tie ettec1-ive date of. zoning for the second incremen} :tall be �iLE�i c��ve-opment has occorred in the first by the Planning Director. "Vevelnr):nent" mejim:; i -hat building permits have been issried for dwe ;ling units ;cl c,- m-<struction has partially corvpleted to t`ne extent t:t;ja!- roofs have been constructed on a minimum of twenty -f i .j- percent of the - riu 1ber of units proposed for the ent=ire area of 103.4+ acre,. 11 li,21_1 Uf actual construction, t=he petitioner may, enter into un with the Hawaii County Housing Agency to assure tf:e C,,'}unty that the dwellings will bu constructed within a given pea -cod. Such agreement shall be s.!c.ured by a surety bead, r;ert fie6 check, or other security accept-A'.:l.0 to C:%rporation 3nd the ]',awai.i COLInty Housing Ay.:m«, I:-= )n final execution of such agreLirxent and filing of the °;'r;.Jr iLV with the Hawaii County Housing Agency, the zoning of the second increment may be deemed by the Planning Director to be effective prior to the actual construction of the dwellings in the first increment provided that. condition E is complied with; (G) Subdivision plans for the first increment of the RS zoned area shall be submitted within one year from the effective date of the zoning. Final subdivision approval shall be secured within one year from the date of receipt of tentative subdivision approval; (H) The RM zc)god area shall be developed in two increments. The first ,Iicr(.•rr:ent shall consist of a maxirr.um of 42 acres of the hiultiE:.7-� Family Residential zoned land and vire ar-cored increment, the rf,,,Iiining area. The effective date of zoning for the second incrc2r,,ent ,;hall be after "devoelopme.nt," as defined in condi.t.ian F, has occurred in the first increment, as determined by the Planning Oirect.or; ( 1'lclt7�4 fol the development within thr first increment of the RM zoned area shall be submit r_�d to the l anninq Department and final plan approval securecl wiLh -n c�ne year from the effective date of the zoning. ConsLractic)-r --;hall within one year from the date of receipt of f° na3 plrin and be completed within three years thereafter; (J) Housing c pportori tins for �Iawaii r4,sidc nts small he provided in accGrdance will, the condition im. poled by thrr =,tate Land Ilse Commission. The number of units and .i,a ser in wl i ch they ��re to be provided shall meet with Lne approval of Lhe Hawaii County Housing Agency; (K) lmprovr,ments to the intersections with Koakini Highway and the Kuakini Highway Extension shall be constructed meeting with the approval of the State Department of Transportation, Highways Division. The intersection improvements shall be constructed corpcurrently with the develop. -Tient of the first increment of the RS or RM zoned areas, whichever occurs first; (L) No direct acc oss shall he provided for the 1 is within the ES zoned area from the mauka-makai callector road; The roadways within the RM zoned area which arrp foo c4.e.lication shall, he constructed to dedicabla stand;4r;» -wig.h ('rir-L)5, gutters, and sidewalks meeting with t :(t of L'ne I)epartment of public Works. Where a roadway pro sx°:_ as zurifs lige or if a zone line should divide a roadway, fi::t� and Sidewalks shall be provided for the er,k. i : r> i i,:t,t shall continue to the nearest interseci iris i:)rs'i71r J. , t_v4�iri telescoping and to provide Consistent i.p II tL' Vfl-I _ -70'- ; (N) At a minimum, roadways wit-hin the RS zi:r7c=3 ar:-:�, -loll t1 L-ovided with paved 5;huulder s &Incl �7 �'v'�:� ._4'tu�. :.`_i CI.'i`i r I'Sy w L L:r L -'lir €.,[caval Of the Departlrit�rlt cf -lC- (0) 'rhe method of sewage disposal shall YaL4et with the approval of the appropriate governm4ental agencies; (P) A drainage master plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Narks for review and approval prior to issuance of any subdivision or plan approvals. The plays shall include, as a minimum, hydrological and hydraulic calculations for all components of the drainage system, a construction ti.metanle for all elements of the system, and an analysis of downstream impacts. Further, mitigating measures as approved by the Department of Public Works shall be taken to eliminate any downstream impacts; (Q) An intensive archaeological survey shall be conducted for the entire property and a report shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to issuance of any subdivision or plan approvals; (R) Should any unanticipated archaeological sites be found during land preparation activities, work shall immediately stop and the Planning 1?epartment notified. Work shall not resume in the affected area until clearance is given by the Planning Department; and, (S) All other applicable rules, regulations and requirements shall be complied with. Should any of the foregoing conditions not be met, rezoning of the area to its original or more appropriate designation may be initiated. SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of the ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other parts of this ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effoct upon its approval. Milo, Hawaii D:�jte of introduction: Date of lst Reading! Date of Znd Reading: Eff.eQtive Elate. Introduced by: t COUNCIL ,jLMt3!;,? ,U'0UNTY OF HAWAz 1 April 18, 1984 April 18, 19$4 May 9, 1384 May 15, 1984 -11- m X, X -R -En 0 > 0 :1, -1 'P -P rn CT vi C F I ri f G 11P FII COUNTY OF HAWAII STATE OF HAWAII BILL NO. 268 ORDINANCE NO2 13J, :\N 0 1)I...\N(.'1.:1'11 .:NJ )ING ORDINANCE NO. 97-99, WHICH AMENDED ( )l.11lN.xNC1' "4 14. 84-:'-", 84-4:�. 884, 90-62, 91-96, 93-26, and 94-34, WHICH E 11:C.LA S1: 11:1) t_'l l R 11IX, I .VV I )ti 1 ROM L NPLANNED (U) -1'0 MULTIPLE FAMILY (E{ M-5) AN I } til %6l_.1_ - I- ,1,1 t l I Y k4- `~ I l_)ENTIAL (RS -15) ZONED DISTRICT" AT 1101_UALOA I and 2. NORTH KO,', A, l-fAWAII, COVERED BY TAX MAP KEY 7-6-21:4, 9-13, ANIS 15-17, R17 IT ORDAINFI7 lel' FHE COUNCIL OF THE COUNTY OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. Ordinance No. 97-99, which amended Ordinance Nus. 84-23, 84-42, 88-4, 90-62, 91-96, 93-26, and 94-34, is amended as follows: "SECTION 1. Section 25-8-3, Article 8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawaii County Cade, is amended to chartge the district classification of property described hereinafter as lipl lows: The Jisirict c��issi?ication of'the following area situated at I toiiialoa 1 and 2, Norlh Kona, Hawaii, shall be NlLiltip`e Family Residential (RM -5) and Single Family Residential (RS -15). (PARCEL 1) Dcginrt ngal the northwest corner of this parcel of land and on the northe&sLerly side of Kuakini Highway Realigrunent, Project No. I IA -(}3-69, the coordinates of said point of beginning rcteiTed to Government Survey Triangulation Station "KAILUA," being 4,193.71 feet South and 8,705.53 feet East, thence running by azimuths measured clockwise from true South: 240" 28' 30" 2,91 3.35 l�:i itcrri`, tlrc reiiiaiticler cif R.P. 4475, L.C. Aw. 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria Karnarnalu; 1 255" 18' 17.97 feet along wine; 3. 3 l 1 0 55' 219.92 feet along same; 4. 331" 14' 15" 143.36 feet along same; Thence along Stream Lot 14 fol- the next thirteen (1 3) courses. the direct azimuths and distances being: 5. 960 54' 67,99 feet; ti . 1120 56 86.79 feet; 7. 900 55' 56,48 f t; 8, 69° 49' 76.70 feet; 9. 460 39' 114.37 feet; M 51 ° 06' 83.31 feet; H. 760 01' 139.84 feet; 12. 51" 29' 175.76 feet; 13, 660 32' 91.49 feet; 1.4. 440 49' 170.06 #eety 15. 250 59' 217.57 feet, 16. 37° 21' 124,60 feet; 17. 31 ° 20' 30" 825.56 feet, Thence along Stream Lot 15 for the next ten (10) courses, tho {ziiituths and distances being. 18. 370 01' 57,70 feet; 19. a 24' 138.13 feet; -2- 20. 44° 0V 114.46 feet; 21. 670 01' 134.84 feet; 22. 1020 13' 107.13 feet; 23. 690 30' 139.97 feet; 24. 310 40' 114.35 feet; 25. 8° 52' 64.54 feet; 26. 114° 04' 60,04 feet; 27. 77° 2 8' 132.01 feet; 28. 1520 15' 10" 95.72 feet along Kuakini Highway Realignment Proj ect No. 1IA-03-69; 29. 1390 59' 30F1 20.75 feet along same; 30. 990 49' 30" 35.58 feet along same, 31, 1540 11' 597.05 feet ,iIong saris to the point of beginning Ind containing. an irea of 37,936 Acre,,:,,. (.1RLd1:!r to P'irca�l as Shown oil Thi c°i:;(:-ici classificationofthe followingarea situL�i-!d it North Kona, 1Ex va. , sji �a": lie. Nlulti;)le F- oiJL Residential (RM 4:")- (PARCEL }:(PAR EL 2) BL:LI,MI:LII cAt the SQMhcast earner of this laarcel of land. being thz• no: ,]°cast corner of Stream, Lot t5, (1-0 coordinatcs of said point ofbeginnino rcfYr:cc'. !o (ova �nirnent Survey Ti an,gUlAtIOT) St;itl0A ": .'llt-UA,I` being 9,565.9(} feet South an.i 11-49,51 feet East, thence t'unj)IrL, I)V LI7.1- YLiths measured clockwise from true South: Along Stream Lot 15 for the next thirteen (13) courses, the direct azimuths acid distances being: --3- I . 65" 45' 2.53 feet, 2, 980 56' 151.87 feet; 3. 121 ° 57' 191.39 feet; 4. 95° 15' 205.20 feet; 5_ 96" 50' 273.37 feet; 6, 74" 55' 132,84 feet, 7. 107° 39' 54.73 feet S. 900 53' 131,87 feet, 9. 129° 17' 96,53 feet; 10. 800 07' 71,22 feet; 11. 53° 36' 104,76 feet; 12. 83° 27' 205,32 feet; 13. 84° 08' 104.72 feet; Thence along Stremi Lot 14 for the next thirteen (13) courses, the direct azimuths and distances being, 14. 211" 20' 30" 763.45 feet; 15. 217 21' 127.42 feet; 16. 245° 59' 243.59 feet; 17. 224° 49' 148.60 feet; 18. 2460 32' 87.91 feet; 19, 2310 29' 170.64 feet; -4- 20. 2560 01' 140_00 feet; 21. 23110 05' 99.89 'ect; 22. 2263 39' 1 04-4 1 foot; 23. 2.49" 49• 24, 270° 55' 3. 64 tc..1 25. 2923 56' S3.57 tecta 26. 2760 54' 90.29 feet; 27. 3540 02' 55.41 feet along the remainder of RR 4475, L.C. r w. 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria Kamamalu, 28. 21" 41' 50" 8-60 feet along same; 2.9. 359° 37' 20" M09 feet along saline; 30. 5c' 07' 20" 44.89 feet along the remaindcr of R.P. -1475, L-C .A~<w . 7713, Ap. 4to V ic`',un.i Ka1.m amalu attcl a1c}iis,. tl1v: 8217, 31, 3550 00' 65.72 feet a.lon- flic rcmaandcr u1 R.P. 8217 . l ',(" oC1 to Joh11 11. Mmiri .1[id :f1oo,g the remainder of R_P_ 4475, 1...,C, Aw. 771.3, Ap- 43 to Victonia lLamamalu; 32. 30 '05 25,75,0 '.1n4 rcma:lll-Jc'r of R.P. 4475, I..L .1 77: , A1). 4 N to VICit n K 2 1) -.,1 r, i.S I i i 33. 77" 08' 20.55 feet alor.•� stin7�,. 34. 4° 39' 203.73 feet aloe 4 .gar i c, -5- 35. 347° 02' 187.60 feet along same; 36. 3370 (?41' 679-20 feet along sante to the point. of beginning and containing an area of 30.401 Acres. (Refer to Parcel 2 as shown on Exhibit A). The district classification of'the following area situated at Holualoa 1 and 2, North Kona, Hawaii, shall he Single FamiIy Residential (RS-15): fit',inning al �'ic' � i� ilm L:st �4r.:lk•r of this parcel of land a,id on the �,�. �e:1�' sik-lw o i' KullAa-KCAL:110U MJ&4,1�- Roakl, i-Ac coordinates ofsmtd point nF:7L'�1Iu!Im, to Government Burk `V 'Triangulai on Station " i1LUA," being 12,047'2 lee: ')oL,t'I Lntl 11x089_$3 fe�.t E.:e;;t, thence running by aziniuths nlcas;urcd i.Iockfrom true SOLit 1) Along. KailILt: -k;. aIiihnu Middle Road for the next thirty s;'x d cuuises, the dir"Ll. azimuths andistalices being, 14' 30" 196.38 feel; 2. 1770 19' 91.93 feet; 3. 1 670 17' 30" 51.67 feet; 4. 18,50 12' 69.99 feet.., 5. 192" 52' 74.50 feet; 6, 173` 31' 3011 20.57 feet; i . 161 ° 40' 30 49.48 feet; (. 141 " 33' 41.74 feet; 9. 128° 06' 63.19 feet, -16- 10. 1.35° 52' 11. 124'"' 23' 12. 113' 18' 13. 1191, 09' 14. 1 1 1 ° 13' 15. 1070 15' 16. 1.02" 131 17. 112" 58' 18. 115D 15' ML'sN ca 20, 111" 55' 21 _ 1100 49' 22. 1040 37' 23. 1040 38' 24. 102° 57' 25. 112° 43' 26. 102° 40' 27. 9'5°' 37' 28, 1040 23' 29. 910 43' 3014 30" 30" 3011 3011 3011 3 011 3011 30" 140.78 feet; 65.66 feet; 37.19 feet; 50.14 feet; 24.45 feet; 108.48 Feet; 70.44 feet; 84.72 feet; 178.23 feet; 87.41 feet; 32.57 feet; 55.63 feet; 24.92 feet; 35.05 feet; 40.04 feet; 58.53 feet; 32.94 feet; 32.48 feet; 85.44 feet; 44.06 feet; - -7 - 30 31.. 32. 33. 34. 35, 36, 37. 38 99P is, 1 120 14' 117° 51' 1250 07' 134° 37' 13.40 37' 1340 00' 154° 11' 3,011 30P1 30" 3011 KL 2400 28, 30" 25.2`] feet; 66.03 feet; 31.69 feet; 43.90 feet - 0.62 feet; 41,48 fcct; 47,64 feet; 44)0.86 feet along: Kuakini Hi�hway Realignment, Proj eel -No. 11 A-03 -oI, -! 1,332.99 feet aIru'.�, 1fs;, roii> ii Vi der of R.P, 4475, L.C- A w. .' ' 1 -4 3 is, Victoria Kanianiala (Loi 39. 1500 28' 30" 337.56 feet along saiiie; Thence along Stream Lot 15 for the next ken (10) courses, the direct azimuths and, distances being: 40. 2330 36' 91.73 feet, 41. 2.600 07' 29.64 feet; 42. 3090 17` 89.97 feet; 43. 2700 53' 203.93 Leet; 44, 2860 30' 113.50 feet; 45, 2670 ll' 352.71 feet; 46. 275° 15' 185.94 feet; 47. 301p 57' IS9.37 feet, _a- 48. 2780 56' 182.35 feet; 49. 2450 05' 10.28 feet; 50. 3450 30' 902.50 feet along the remainder of R.P. 4475, L.G. Aw. 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria Katnarnalu. and along the remainder of Grout 3630 to W.H. Conwell; 51, 3343 30' 969.30 feet along the remainder of R.P. 4475, L.C. Aw, 7713, Ap. 43 to Victoria Kamarmalu; 52. 20 00' 537.04 feet along same; 53. 860 51' 30" 124.73 feet along Grant 988 to Kamalo, 54. 9311 48' 45.22 feet along same; 55. 844 14' 106.16 feet along same, 56. 1 U44 06' 3011 41.60 feet along same; 57. 774 41' 30" 76.19 feet along Grant 988 to Katnalo and along Grant 1591 to Hoolawaihonua; Thence along Grant 1531 to Hoolawaihonua for the next rine (9) courses, the direct azimuths and distances beim; 58. 82* 34' 126,79 feet; 59. 142° 51' 32.82 feet; CO. 814 37' 106.15 feet; 61. 674 57' 301" 30.29 feet; 62. 83" 03' 30" 259.61 feet; 63. 724 49' 30" 90.07 feet; -9- 64, 84° 37" 30" 70.23 feet; 65, 78° DS' 02.37 feet; fib. 829 02' 30'" 157.05 feet to the p«irit ()fbegiiUjing and containing an area of 103.293 Acres. (Refer to Parcel 3 as shown on Exhibit A) All as shown on the map attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and by rer"'erence made a part hereof: SECTION 2. Thcsc change in district classification are conditioned upol7 the dGl]OWillg- (A) the Toning for the property shall be effective only after:(i) there are assurances satisfactory to the Departments of Water Supply and Planning, upon consultation with the State Department of Health, and the Division of Vater and Land Development of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources, that a water source of sufficient quality and quantity has leen established within Iwo years from the effective date of this ordinance; provided that a maximum one -yeas oxtenc;ion to the two-year time limit may be ��i aiitcd by the Planning Director with reasonable and sulrlclent fu :r c;;tiOr. �,:td (`') „r, a- .- t:rnent, accompanied by an appropriate surety band or other acceptable security, is executed with the Department of Water Supply for the actual development of a proven water source and its water transmission and distribution system within one year from t]ie official date of compliance with condition A (1); provided that a orre-year extension to the orae -year time limit may be granted by the Planning Director with -10- reasonable and sritf c ent _Eustiiicavon; or (3) the Department of Nater Supply issues a water Commitment for the proposed development; (B) no subdivision or development of any portion of the land shall occur unless and unti I condition A has been complied with; (C) the Planning Director shall he mandated to initiate action for the repeal of this ordinance if conditions Asir B have not been complied with; (D) Ilio petitioner, its assigns of successors, shall he responsible for cattlplying with all conditions o fapprov< jj; (E) the caning for the 49�- acres designated by the State Land Use Comm issiorl as its second zoning increment shall not become effective until that land is ceilifod by that coo mission to be within the Urban District; (F') the RS zoned area shall be developed in two increments_ The first increme€tt shall consist of a maximum of 59.5+ contiguous ages, and the second, the remaining area. The effective date of zoning for the second increment shall be after developrocnt has occurred in the first increment, as determine by the planning Director. "Developrnmt" means the applicant has completed the on-site and off-site improvements within the first irlcrement of the RS zoned area and has dedicated the roadway to the Courity; {CT} subdivision plans for the first i.ucrement: ofthe RS zoned arca shall be submitted W11 III: I w., lk-, vt:<<:• from the effective date of the zoning. Final stibdivision approval hu srwcure{1 •,� ithin two years troin the effective date of this amendment- (H) the RM zoned area shall be developed In two increments. The first iricremettt Shall consist O1 a rtt,IXiMUM of 42 acres of the Multiple Family Residential zoned land and the second increnicnt, the remaining area. The effective date of zoning for the second increment shall be after the applicant has completed the o -n -site and off-site iinprovernents of -the first incruji,ent of (lie RM zonod area and has dedicated the i nprovenients to the County; (1) pians for the dov::;'opmc-ni wiil,ki 111; fll-;LA 111C1 -CMC) -Jt Offlfk PIM k: 1111:,,'111 A De - submitted to the Planning Depanment and final plant approval secured within five }Fears from the �fffec!Ive date ofthis sixth ani endiiterit. Construction shall cornrnence within one year from the date of receipt of final plan approval and be completed within three gears thcrealler; (J) slioulcl 111e CouTICII adopt,a Unified Impact Fees Ordinance setting forth criteria fhr the imposition of exactions or the assessment of impact fees, conditions included herein shall be credited towards the requirements of the Unified impact Nees Ordinance; (K) housing opportunities far Hawaii residents shall be provided in accordance with the condition imposed by the State Land Use Commission, T11c nurnber of units and manner in which they are to be provided shall meet with the approval of the Hawaii County Housing Agency; (L) improvements to the intersections with KuEddin Highway and the Kuaicini Highway hxtensIon shah he constructed meeting vv ith the approval ofthe State D pa:rtment of -Transportation, Highways Division- The intersection -12- improvements shall be constructed concurrently with the development of the first increment of the RS or RM zoned areas, whichC�VeT acours first; (MvI) no direct access shall be provided for the lots within the RS zoned area from the mauka-makai collector road; (N) the roadways and stubout within the R49 zoned area shall be constructed to dedicable standards with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works and shall br. dedicated to the CcLin ty of I-lawaii upon completion. 'Where a roadway crosses a zone line or If a zone lime should divide a roadway, the curbs, gutters, and sidewalks shall be provided for the entire right -of -the -way and shall continue to the nearest intersection in order to avoid telescoping and to provide consistent improvcrnerrt; (0) at a winimum, roadways and stubouts within the RS zonct_1 area shall be provided with paved shoulders and paved swales meeting with the approval of the DepaArnent of Public Works and shall be dedicated to the County of Htavvauu llpcn completion; (P) the method of sewage disposal shall meet with the approval of the appropriate governmental agencies; (Q) a drainage master plan shall be submitted to tb�� Npaa-tment Df Public Warks for review and approval prior to issuance of any subdivision or plan approvals. The plan. shall include, as a minimum, hydrological and hydrauiic calculatinrrs for al components of the drainage system, a constrnaction timetabic for all elcillents til` the system, and an analysis ofdowwnstreana impacts- Further, *mitigating measures as approved by the Departnicnt of'Public Works shall be taken to cli nillate ally downstream impacts; (R) an intensive archaeological survey shall be conducted for the entire prc)perty and a report shall be submitted to the PWning Department prior to issuaricc of ally subdivision or plan approval,;,- (S) pprovals; (S) should ally unanticil)ated archaeuIagica] sites be foutyd during land preparanoll activities, work shall inirnediately step and the Planning Department notified. Mork shall not resume in the affected area Until clearance is given by the planning Department, (T) pricer to the Final Approval of the second increment, the applicant, its successors of assigns shall pay for any additional real property taxes owed fear the new residential assessed value of the subject property which was previously taxed at the agricultural rate, and (U) an initial extension of tulle for the performance of conditions within the ordinance may 1)C granted i)y the Planning Director LI Pon the following circumstances: I ) the non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been forescen or are beyond the control of the applicants, successors or assigns, and that are not the rcsult of their fault or negligence, 2) granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the general plan or zoning code; 3) granting of tilt Urne extension would not be contrary tc+ the original reasons for rhe granting of the change of Lone; -14- 4) t!ic tirnc cxicnsion granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period nriLI r dl.v _gr-anleO for perforinance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one year may he extended for up to one additional year); and 5) if the applicant should rcquire an additional extension of time, the Planning Director shall submit the applicant's request to the County Council for appropriate action_ Further, should any sof the conditions not 1-�e met or substantially complied with in a tirnely fashion, the Director initiate reLoning of the area to its original or more appi-alariate designation." SECTION 2. Material to be deleted is bracketed. New material is underscored. SECTION 3. In the event that any portion of the ordinance is declared invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the ether parts ofthis ordinance. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall tale effect upon its approval. 1)ar c of ]ntroAll'.tion: Pnte of I st Re rig- 1)ate of 2nd leading: INTRODUCED BY: M1 C CTL. MEMBER, COUNTY OF HAWAII Novel i er 8, 2002 I ov,r -ibcr 8, 2002 Nowtlj.er 20, 2002 Nu,_F--nber 27, 2002 7.68 xf Pv �o Io � rV J1 4 7 42: ul Il. j. I 4 r6 7 42: ul Y - r6 Introduced By: Date Introduced: First Reading: Publisbcd- REMARKS; OFFICE OF 'I COON t Y CLEKK County of Hawaii Hiio Hawaii BobbydeanLp.J. -:i J - I November 8, 2302 November 8, 2002 N/A Second Reading- No v c- 7. b e r 20 2 G, 0 2 TOM-aYL)T: R4.'turned: ]q-.(-)-ven-ibrrr 29, 2002 Fffecfive: NOV-Culb-iX.27,_ 2002 Published- December 10, 2002 REMARK S, R(')', I - C A'..[, V OT P AYLS ; (-*-.S.. ABS FN Arakuki x '..,llullc x x Jaco[*;,C-1 x x Satarik x X x ROLL_ CALL VOTE AYES NOES A13S EX Arakak! x Chun h Imon off x jacobqon — - ----- ---- 1.6thcad-Todd x x x T,Jel x 20 rl x 7 0 2 I DO HEREBY CERTIFY ihat theI fibregoing HILL wcu adopled by the Counly Council published as- indicaredabove. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: 5� DEPUTY CORPORATION COUNSEL COUNTY OF HAWAII Date— A t IT,01 tie, Z - cApprov, Dfsapoprvedihis C�-'l day ppr()V �, I Of 20 0 -1" HA W.4 11 4 YOR ot'�' oll I I yoj�z CO UN TT CLERK 268 131111M Reference: C-768/PC-105 Ord No.: 02 JL31L Milb'wil U. Roah Lce L. I_nrai %bf 6V8 MAQ bar: ra* A14' a H-5wni'r 01'rice '4-$144 Aare KimIxA-Mule Huy KIMI Ad Kdm. 1{awrq'P 7(s7449 I�Mrri. ;N+I:.r, 373-s77f1 5.pWjnber 13, 2021 FILE COPY SEP 2 3 2021 � r County of Rawaii PLAIllNlM.r DI'.P"ARIA11"N'.1' I i,', i.,,)ntnerral Review Propram 01ice of Planning and 5,:swinable Develoflrt ew 235 S. Beretania St., Rm. 702 HC)II' ltllu, H1 96813 [Tear Director, Tendo Kem Drp,vor %V D]grow Subject: Final Euviroametittil Assessment (FEA) and pinning crf No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Roval Vistas Housing Project Location. Forth Karla District, Island of tlawai`i I`M WS); i31 7-6-011-, U I6 - 019 With this letter, the cuuw.y wl' Hjiwai'i Planning Depariment (Acct tlriu Aolho.Ity) hereby transmits electronically the mics€il Environmental Assessment and Findirig of No Significdnl Impact (FEA-FONSI) for the proposed RoyRl Vistas Housing Project for public.iliurl in the n>exi available 'edition of the Envirc imcotal Notice, The R-oyal Vistas Hou4ing Project is being proposed to construct up to 450 multi -family msidential units in clusters of two- and thirce-story building~ on approximately 70 acres of land. Additional impRivcments are also platt>icii such ;is lalndsc pfflg, ro idways, and utilities. The Dmft Ew-imnmenti3l As'*cS meat ,and Anticipated Finding or No Significant TMpact (DEA- AFONSI) was published In the OEQkC's ScrAc Wr 8, 2020. issue of the Ftiviroamcntal Noticc. The FEA includes copies of cornment, received and the corrc,�ponding responses frorn the applicant that were received during the 30 -clay public comment period on the DEA- A,FONSI- Da;cd on the finrilings from. Part 5 of the I-L'A. rhe Pkinning Depairtmcrit has dctermineri that tl l.,~ prcicct vvi11 not havc is "significant crtcc.t" or "si nificant impact"' on the quAL-y of the environmcnl and have thereftbrl issued 3 I-ONISI -I his FONS] drrrs nal constitute Approval of the project or of any project carnponents or proposed uses. 22-436 AP, ffu,, III r f:wom% n. an b7ard 6�4" rrrnAn Pain t4*1 t140 FAnpeuh r : I r qrl., h14.., ,, rI. . ERP/EN September 13, 2021 Page 2 If there are any questions regarding this Setter or the project, please conwt Alex boy of OUT Planning Dcptt Lmt;nt Nwff at ('808) 961-5140 or via crnail at Alex-key,:a_hawaticoterly-gQy, ssnceruly. J Ff.V w Ga tw 15up 13,1021 11-35 HSri JEFFREY W. DARROW Deputy Planning Director .411jaa cah0l pL=ng�%ubh-6lwFrwrAMUzlicrsV2' 2l\Ruyel Visw PD le OEQC FEA.d& 22-039 From v,,- bma steTahawam Law To: DKDT CUP Envlran�atentnl RVft Program Subject: VKAA online subrnission for The. IEnvironrrantal Notice Dwtq; Thwrsday, 5epternber 16, 20213; 10: 47 PM Action Name Royal Vistas Housing Project Type of Uocumen-VDetermination Final environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact (I<EA-FONSl) FIDS §343-5(a) Trigger(s) a (1) Propose the use of state or county lands Dr the use of state of county funds Judicial district North Kona- Hamai`i Tax Map Key(s) (TMK(s)) (3) 7-6-021:016,1(3) 7-"21:017 (3) 7-6-021:018-.(3) 7-6-021:019 Action type Applicant Other required perrnita and approvals Grading Permit, Drainage Plan (County DPW); Building Permits and Plan Approval (County DPW and Planning); National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permil (State DOH); Chapter 6E, HRS, determination from State Historic Preservation Division on historic property effects (obtalned) Discretionary consent required Approval o! Amendments to Zoning Ordinance (County Council) Approving agency County of Hawaii Planning Department Agency contact name Alex Roy Agency contact email (for into about the action) Email address or URL for receiving comments Agency contact phone 961-8140 Agency address COUNTY OF HAWAI'l PLANNING DEPARTMENT 101 PAUAHI STREET, SUITE 3 Hilo. H195720 United States Mao It Applicant Kana TI ee I_L.G Applicant contact name Richard VVneal,ack Applicant contact email ri c ha rpt �e astwest re a Itk . o rn Applicant contact phone (808) 75 3187 Applicant address 101 Hualalai Street Hilo, HI 96720 United States Man It Was this submittal prepared by a consultant? Yes Consultant Stantec Consulting and Geometrician Associates LLC Consultant contact name Mir,hele Lefebvre Consultant contact email n- Icliele.letebyTe le;_ -Q!-:1 Consultant contact phone 1808) 494-2039 Consultant address P.0 cox 191 Hilo, HI 96721 United States mw_u Action summary The proposed project is located approximately 2.7 miles so4Xh of downtown Kailua4<'Ona and would consist of necessary improvements to construct up to 4501 multifamily residential units in clusters of two -- and three-story bulidings on approximately 70 acres. Units would target local renters and buyers in the "market" pnce paints. The project is the final phase of the anginal zoning ordinance (No 84-23) signed on May 15, 1984, and includes the multi -family zoned land which was planned for worry-lome housing_ Electrical and sewer would be extended from nearby utility grid terminus and water ccrnmitments have already been purchased for the project The proposed project has been designed to minimize impacts from surface water run-off. Traffic impacts would be minimized with a new un signalized intersection Taff Queen Ka'ahumainu Highway. No inVacts to biological resources, historic or archaeological resources, or cultural sites or practices are expected from the project. Reasons supporting determination {1 ) Irrevocably commit a natural, cultural, or historic resource No valuable natural or cultural resources would be committed or last as a result of the Proposed Project No impacts to archaeological resources would occur with the planned preservation of the railroad berm and petroglyph (2) Curtail the range of beneficial uses of the environment; The proposed mid-markel housing development does not curtail beneficial uses of the environment and is consistent with the medium density zoning in the LUPAG and conforms to the guiding principles regarding urban gi—cwth pattems as defined by the Kona CDP. (3) Conflict with the Stats's environmental policies or long-term environmental goals established by law: The State's long-term en vironmentaI policies are set forth its Chapter 344, HRS. The broad goals of this policy are to conserve natural resources and enhance the quality of life. The impact front the Proposed Project is minor and, therefore, is consistent wittr all elements of the State's long-term environnnental policies and environmental goals (4) Have a substantial adverse effect on the economic welfare, social welfare, or cultural practices of the community and State; The Proposed Project would not adversely affect tate social welfare of the community and would contribute to services. The Proposed Project would generate worts for the local construction industiry, which would stimulate local economic spending. The Proposed Project would balance the social welfare of the community by providing infill raid -market housing and allow resident households better access and the ability to safety manage commutes between home. work_ and recreation. Stable households lead to stable communities and associated worikforce, and prornotes a functional economy. (5) Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Proposed Project would no: affect public health in any way, stormwater would be approprtatel+y dispersed of in drainage structures Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design. (fs) Involve adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities; No adverse secondary effects are expected since the development would +Ftilize existing infrastructure, provide rnftll housing, and is not exraeMed to result in substantial demands to County services. (T) Involve a substantial degradation of environmental quarity. The impact from tfie Proposed Project is minor. and would thus not contribute to environmental degradation 2MPs and appropriate erosion control measures would be utilized during construction. Short-term impacls on air and noise quality will be mitigated by employing BMPs No long-term adverse impacts are expected from the Proposed Project. {3) Be indivOualfy limited lout cumulatively have substantial adverse effect upon the environment or involves a commilrnenI for larger actions The Proposed project is not related to other activities in the region in such a way as to produce adverse cumulative effects or involve a commitment for larger actions_ (9) Have a substantial adverse effect on a rare, threatened, or endangered species, or its habitat: There ars no rare, threatened. or endangered species or suitable habitat for these species present at the Project Site, and no effects to these species are anticipated_ Endangered Hawaiian hoary bats and formarly listed Hawaiian hawks, which are island wide-ranging species, would experience no adverse impacts due to mitigation in the farm of tuning of vegetation removal ancicr hawk nest survey. Additionally, no ran=. threatened, or endangered species of fauna are known to exist on or near the Project Site, and none would be directly ,affected by any project activries (10) Have a substantial adverse effect on air carwater quaWy or ambient noise levels, Na adverse effects on air quality or noise would occur. The increase in noise levels on the site are acceptable and would be Drily a moderate increase in the existing levels. To minimize impacts tv air quality during construction, ttae Proposed Project would implement a watering program for dust abatement_ Other control measures during construction such as limiting the area that can be disturbed at any given time, appiying chemical soil stabilizers, mulching andfvr using wind screens would also be utilized as necessary to minimize impacts to air quality. (11) Have a substantial adverse effect on or be likely to suffer damage by being located in an environmeintally sensitive area such as a flood plain, tsunami zone. sea level rise exposure area, beach, erosion -prone area, geologically hazardous land, estuary, fresh water, or coastal waters; Although the property is located in an area with volcanic and s€isirnic risk, the entire Island of Hawei'I shares this risk, and the Proposed Project is not imprudent to construct. The property is approximately 0.85 miles from the shoreline and the development is outside any flood plain. Based on potential impacts from climate change, the Proposed Project has keen designed to accommodate increased stormwater run-uff from larger storms i,n the adjacent drainages and on site. (12) Have a substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and viewplanes, during day or night. identified in county or state plans or studies: or No scenic vistas or viewplanes rdenMed in the Hawaii County General Plan will be adversely affected by the Proposed Project_ (13) Require substantial energy consumption or emit substantial greenhouse gases. The development would have solar water heating and incorporate efficient appliances. as practical and possible. Negligible emissions of greenhouse gases would occur during constructed, and occupation of the proposed development Since the Project addresses an existing demand for housing. it is expected that a portion of the residents that would occupy the development already live in Kona or on Hatiwai'i Island, and there would not be a substantial increase in emissions when residents occupy the Project, Therefore, Project impacts would be considered a negligible increase to the global annual greenhouse gas emissions. Attached documents (signed agency letter & EAJEfS) Shapefile LM a-L"IM I 11111N1 OF EM QRMM The location map for this Final EA is the same as the location map for the associated Draft EA. Action location map M101MRTMEMIA1 Authorized individual Alex J. Roy Authorization The above narned authorized individual hereby certifies that helshe has the authority to make this submission, FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Royal Vistas housing Project TM Ks (3) 7-6-021:016, 7-6-021:017, 7-6-021:018, and 7-6-021:019 North Kona District, Hawaii Island State of Haal`i September 2021 Applicant Kora Three LLC 101 Huddd Street Hilo, H1 96720 Approving Agency County of Hawai'i Pionning Department 101 Pauchi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 967201 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Royal Vistas Housing Project Tt,',Ks �3) 7-6-021:016, 7-6-021:417, 7-6-421:013, and 7-6-421:019 North Kana District, Howci'i Island, State of Hawai'l APPLICANT: Kona Three LLC 101 Hualalcii Strut Hilo, HI 96720 APPROVING AGENCY: County of Howoi'i Manning Department 101 Pouch! Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 95720 CONSULTANT: Stantec Consulting Inc P.O. Box 191 Hilo, HI 96721 CLASS OF ACTION: Use of County Lands Geometrician Associates P.O. Box 396 Hilo, fel 96721 This document is prepared pursuant to: The Hawaii Environmental Policy Act, Chapter 343, Ho ai'i Revised Statutes, and Title 11, Chapter 200.1, Hav+wai'i Department of Health Administrative Rules [this page intentionally let blank] TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION. LOCATION, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS.................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Location and Property Ownership ............................................ 1 1.2 Project Description.................................................................................. 1 1.3 Purpose and Need...............................................,..........................,....... 5 1.4 Environmental Assessment Process ........... ................ I ....... I .... ........ 1.....13 1.5 Public involvement and Agency Coordination ................................. 13 PART 2: ALTERNATIVES .............................................................................................. 15 2.1 Proposed Project................................................................................... 15 2.2 No Action............................................................................................... 15 2.3 Altematives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis ...... 15 PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES, CUMULATIVE IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES .............................. 18 3.1 General Setting....................................................................................... 18 .2 Environmental Consequences............................................................. 18 3.3 Physical Environment............................................................................ 19 3.3.1 Climate, Geology. Soils, and Geologic Hazards ..................... 19 3.3.2 Flood Zones and Drainage........................................................ 22 3.3.3 Water Quality and Water Quantity............................. .............. 26 3.3.4 Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems................................................... 28 3.3.5 Ncis(;.............................................................................................3,5 3.3.6 Air Quality and Scenic Resources...... ....................... ............ - 37 3.3.7 Hazardous Materials and Wastes..............................................38 3.4 Socioeconomics....................................................................................39 3.5 Cultural Practices and Sites..................................................................41 3.6 Historic and Archaeological Resources .............................................. 46 3.7 Infrastructure ..... ............................................................. .......... ....... I...... 49 3.7.1 Utilities and Public Services including Wastewater Treatment and Solid Waste Management ......................................... 49 3.7.2 Traffic............................................................................................ 51 3.8 Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitments of Resources ................. 60 3.9 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts............................................................ 60 3.10 Unresolved Issues................................................................................... 60 3.11 Required Perffts and Approvals......................................................... 60 3.12 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies ............................. 61 3.12,1 Hawai `I State Land Use Law, Ha al'i State Plan, and State Housing Functional Plan ........................... . ... ...............I.... 'All 3.12,2 Coastal Zone Management Program (Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statutes) ....................................................................... 68 3.12.3 Hawaii County Zoning, Special Management Area, andGeneral Plan.................................................................................. 69 Royal Vrstus Housog Project Envrronmenta� Assessment 3.12,4 Kana Community Development Plan ....................................... 72 PART 4; DETER MINATION..................... ........ ............................... .............. .......... 1-- 74 PART 5` FINDINGS AND REASONS.............................................I.............................. 75 PART6: REFERENCES................................................................................................. 78 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Plant Species Observed in the Project Site .............................................. 29 Table 2 Bird Species Observed in the Project Site.................................................31 Table 3 Selected Socioeconomic Characteristics................................................ 39 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 1 I APPENDICES Project Location Map............................................................................. 7 Proposed Reads and Existing Ditches in the Project Site ..................... 8 Conceptual Building Layout.... ............. .............. ............................... 10 Two -Story and Three -Story Building S&ematic.................................. 11 Concepts for Building Ltayout............................................................... 12 Sea Level Rise Exposure Map........................................ ....................... 22 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRM Map. ............... ............................ . 24 Local Intersections Studied for the Project ......................................... 54 Proposed Improvements to project Intersection with Queen Ka'ahumanu.......................................................................................... 55 Close-up of Proposed Improvements to Project Intersection with Queen Ka'ahurnanu.............................................................................5 CCP Transportation Network Mop in the Vicinity of the Project....... 58 APPENDIX( 1 a APPENDIX 1 b APPENDIX , APPENDIX 3 APPENDIX 4 APPENDIX 5 APPENDIX 6 Early Consultation Letters Comments on Craft EA cnd Responses Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) Biological Survey Results Cultural Impact Assessment Archaeological Inventory Survey Reports Archaeological Preservation Plan Royal Vistas Housog Project Envrronmenta� Assessment SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED ACTION, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES The proposed project is located approximately 2.7 miles south of downtown Kailua-Koro and would consist of necessary improvements to construct up to 454 multi -family residential units in clusters of two- and three-story bulldings on approximately 70 acres. The following are estimates for the number of units, floor plans, bedroom/bathroom counts, and buildings heights. The numbers may be adjusted during final design and permitting. The development would conceptually include approximately 174 "Por fent" units consisting of 122 two- bedroor-n/two-broth units and 52 three-bedroom/two-bath units plus +ia resident manager's unit, all in two-story buildings on the +makar portion of the project site. The development would also include approximately 274 "For Sale" units consisting of 147 two bedroomitwo-bath units and 137 three-bedroom/two-bath units plus a resident manager's unit. The "For Seale" units would be located in approximately ten two-story buildings and approximately 39 three-story buildings, with the two- story buildings being four units each and the three-story buildings being six units each,. Parking would consist of a mix of cowered and open spaces for residents and guests. The project would be developed in two or more phases, with Phase I having a maximum of 258 units and Phase II hawing the balance of 192 units. Phase i would include all the Rental units and some Scale units. Both Rental and Sale units would target local renters and buyers in the "market" price points. There waraid he two Community Centers, one for the Rental units and one for the Sale units. Each center would have ca pool sand facilities for use by the residents. The c��eweirn nt wain be cnmr licant ifih,Americon wt_I_ is il1Jies Act Standar for accessible design. The project is the final phase of the original zoning ordinance (No. 84-23) signed on May 15, 1984, and includes the multi -family zoned land which was plannedfor work -force housling. Electrical and sewer would be extended from nearby utility grid terminus and water commitments have already been purchased for the project. The proposed project has been designed to minimize impacts from surface water run-off. Traffic impacts would be minirnized with a new un -signalized intersection serving the project off Queen Ka`ahumeanu Highway. No impacts to biological resources, historic or archaeological resources, or cultural Sites or proctices, are expected from the project. Royal Atcs Housing Project Environmentd AsseSsment iii [this page Intentionally left blank]' Royal Atcs Housing Project Environmentd ,Assessment iv PART 1: PROJECT DESCRIPTION, LOCATION, AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS 1.1 Project Location and Property Ownership Kona Three LLC (Kona Three) proposes to develop the Royal Vista Housing Project ("Proposed Project") which would occur within Tax Map Keys (TMQ (3) 7-6- 021:016, 7-6-021:017, 7-6-021:018, and 7-6-021:019 in North Kona ("Project Site") as shown can Figures 1 and 2. Kona Three owns TIMKs 7-6-021:0116 and 7-6-021,017 which together cover approximately 69 acres" while the County of Hawai'i Department of Public Works (DPWmanages TMI(s 7-6-021:018 and 7-6-021.019 which together cover ❑pproxii-n ately 7.3 acres. The Project Site is located 2.7 miles south of downtown Kailua-Kona along Queen Ka"ahumanu Highway (Highway 19�. Photos 1 and 2 were taken at the Project Site. 1.2 Project Description Housing Project Kona Three proposes to construct up to 450 multi -family residential units in clusters of two- and three-story buildings on approximately 70 acres. A conceptual drawing of the layout of the buildings is shown on Figure 3. The following are estimates for the number of "For Rent" and "For Sale°" units, floor plans, bedroom/bathroom counts, and buildings heights.. Although the numbers may be adjusted during final design and permitting, the EA analyzes the maximum bullding height of three stories and the maximum number of units (450 units), The medium density development would include approximately 174 "Fnr Rent" units consisting of 122 two-bedroom/two-loath units and 52 three-bedroom/two-bath units plus a resident manager's unit, all in two-story buildings can the makai portion of the Project Site. A property management firm would manage the rental units. A schematic showing the site sections for two- and three-story buildings is shown on Figure 4, and the concepts for layout shown Can Figure 5. The development would also include approximately 274 ''For Sale" units consisting of 147 two bedroom/two-bath units and 137 three-bedroom/two-bath units plus a resident manager's unit. The "For Sale" units would be located in ten tiro -story buildings and 39 three-story buildings, with the two-story buildings being tour units each and the three-story buildings being six units each. Parking would consist of a mix of covered and open spaces for residents and guests. A comment from Gary East on the Draft EA asked about alkab'lity within the dev re r� pendix 1 Private driveways within the develpoment would be paved and provide safe c cess.for resi.d_e_at5_fEc_1udi.n_q_5tre-e-t _9Q_n_,_1belo_GtiQn__Qf WlJ within the devela rnent would be determined upon final design. Royal Atcrs Piecing Project Environmentc0 Assessment The Project would be developed in two or more phases, with Phese I having a maximum of 258 units and Phase II having the balance of 192 units. Phrase I would include all the Rental units and some kale units. Both Rental and Sale units would target local renters and buyers in the "market" price paints. Phase I is expected to be completed by 2024, and Phase Il is expected to be completed by 2029. There wouId be two Community Centers, one far the Rental units and one for the Sale units. Foch center would have a pool and facilities for use by the residents. A cornment from Clvde Hembv on the [graft FA asked whether the nrnr)csed development would be earnolicint with Arrnericon with Discibillties Act Stondords for accessible design. Construction could start as early as third quarter of 2021, following Plon Approval and construction permits, and would be expected to last 12 to 18 months. Construction would be conducted in accordance with any applicable COVID-19 emergency proclamations in place at that time, The Project is the final residential development identified in the zoning ordinance (No. 84-23) signed in 1984. The original zoning ordinance and subsequent amendments included the following:. • 103 acres for 215 single-family units, • 71 acres for multi -family, mid -market' units (the Proposed Project); and • An additional 12 acres acquired at the behest of the County of Howal'i, Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCD) at TMK (3): 7-6- 24:025- The -6_24:025_ The development of the single-family units on 108 acres was mostly completed by the previous developer. The previous developers built and installed roadways, intersection, and drainage improvements, as well as driveways, light poles, utility infrastructure, landscaping, and other assets for the new community. The 12 -acre area for the affordable housing project is located on what are now TMKs (3) 7-6- 24:25, 112. and 113 and the area could be developed in the near future. As a condition in the zoning ordinance, Kona Three had an agreement to convey the 12 acres of land for the affordable housing when construction of the Project's drainage system is completed. A cornmgnt from Martin Q�-)an on the Draff Eli, asked about the affordable houls1ng projecl IAppendix 1l al_ if 0 H C D decides not tp rs e ..an pffordgiple,housing prolecl at this locotlan K.on❑ Three would egotlate a new agreement with QHCD to satisfy the requirement of the zoning ordinance using options such as cledicati some of the Project's units for C _ I WJJ _ploy[' i. g. a.ff r ble k auslr } .elsewhere off= j.�e trL.Konc.. ocquiring affordable housing credits from another location in Kona, or a combination of these conations. S Mid -market refers lo the prig point that the Project targets, whichis in between the subsidized housing market and the w4cilthy or upper middle market groups. Priya! Vfstcs Pic wing Project Environrnentd Assessment 2 Electrical and sewer service would be extended trom nearby public grid terminus and wafer commitments have already been purchased for the Project. The Project is in an urban area located between Dona Vistas and Pualani Estates subdivisions and is in close proximity to major roadways, recreational opportunities, and essential services; including grocery and wholesale stores, employrnent, hospital/clinics, public transit, gas stations, schools, financial institutions, government agencies/ services, and the airport, To address housing shortages in Kona, the Kona Community Development Plan (CDPj identifies Objective HSG -4: Build More Units and Policy HSG -4.2: Workforce Housing. The workforce gap group (up to 1807Q of median income) includes the pari of the population that earns too much to qualify for affordable housing programs, yet too little to buy or rent decent housing close to their jobs. The Project would build units that offer a variety of housing types for loath the rental and buyer segments of the mid -market which includes the workforce group. Although the Project is not specifically a workforce project, it would provide a housing option for the workforce gap group, The Project is an infill project located within the Kona Urban Area as designated by the Official Kona Land Use Map (Figure 4-7 in the Kona CDP), although it is not in the Trc )` Or'ented Development (TOD) area nor within a CDP Concurrency Zone. As stated in the CDP, "Within this Kana Urban Growth Area, growth would be directed to compact villages located along proposed transit routes or to infill areas within, or adjacent to, existing development." The Proposed Project is consistent with this designation, Reads The existing Zoning Ordinance for the Project requires Kona Three to build three main road segments to County dedicable standards and to dedicate these segments to the County. Speciflcally, these segments are laid out in the "Officlal Tronsportation Network trap - Nana Kailua Area" as part of the County's plan to expand the road grid to help alleviate traffic and provide safer driving conditions. These segments that are designed include: • to connect County -owned Leilani Street (in the Kona Vistas project) to County -owned Ho'omama Street (in the Pualani Estates project); • to connect County -owned Kekuana'oa Place (in the Kona Vistas project) to County -awned Paulehia Street (in the Pualani Estates project): and • to connect these new roads to each ether within the Project area. Kana Three is required to build and dedicate these roads by Ordinance. Royal Vfsfcs Fiowing Project Environmental Assessment 3 The Proposed Project would extend Kekuana'o❑ Place, it would construct Royal Vistas Roadway, and it would construct the Leilani Street extension in the Project Site as shown on Figure 2. The Proposed Project would stub -out the Leilani Street extension on the southern Project Site boundary and would not connect it across the private parcel (TMK (3) 7-6-021:014 owned by the Calvary Community Church of Kona) to the existing Leilani Street. Comments from GgLy Fast c,,'pd JQhn Po ell on the Draft EA were provided regarding sidewalks and gutters within the v 1 t dedicaable standards would include -sidewalks and curved butters. Nene of the roads proposed for the Project would be connected to Ho'ornornaa Street ❑nd Paulehia Street. Those connections occur across another privately -awned parcel TMK (3) 7-6-013:004 north of the Project Site not controlled by Kara Three. In t Drainage Improvements TMKs 7-6-021,018 and 7-6-021:019 are owned and managed by the County of Hcawai`i Department of Public Warks (DPW) as drainages located adjacent to the proposed housing development (Figure 1). TMK (3) 7-6-21:19 encompasses approximately 4.25 acres, includes part of the Holualoo Ditch, and runs along the southern boundary of the Project Site. Infrastructure during Phase II of the Proposed Project includes installation of a culvert system along with utilities and rQqdwq across the ditch to extend Kekuana`oo Street, which would thea be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the KCDP "Official Transportation Map." [figure 2 illustrates where the _Ho�a I)ifc located. This improvement is the HEPA trigger for the EA since it crosses County - owned land, TMK () 7-6-21:18 encompasses approximately 3.0 acres, includes the mcukca portion of the Horseshoe Bend Ditch proximate to the Proiect, and runs between the two subject parcels of the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project includes infrastructure for channelizing a portion of this ditch and includes a road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the KDCP"s "Official Transportation Map." Figure 2 also illustrates the lo_c_ afiQn of the Horseshoe Bend Ditch. This is also ca HEPA trigger for the EA. The mokoi portion, of the Horseshoe Bead Ditch is located within the Project Site (TMK (3) 7-6-21:016] , and as part of the Project this portion would be channelized where it is primarily sheet flow and moved closer to the northern Project boundary to make roam for the planned roadway intersection at Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway at the location approved by the State Department of Transportation Highways Division, side.frm thy.Hca_1._illrc�.v.me.nts..t1'l$:I..n tadvc�Y Royal Vistcs Flowing Project environmental Assessment 4 the applicant is not proposing to construct any additional structures in the oy-fY_-o _n ar FIs. In response to comments received on, the Draft. EA (AAppendlx. 1b1 , additional detail regarding the need for the drainage improvements as well cis r�r�ssible improvement options are iscuss!ad wlth more context fn Sec hon 3.3.2. 1.3 Purpose and Need The purpose of the Proposed Project is to complete the final phase of the project and provide multi -family mid -market horsing in North Dana. According to the Kona Community Deveiopment Plan (CDP), although home construction has outpaced papulation growth, Kona continues to experience a mousing crisis as the production of new homes has been skewed to upper income levels. The project would "provide housing choices" to residents of North Kana, consistent with several of the guiding principles in the CDP. The Project is the final phase of the larger development project that includes Kona Vistas, which was approved as part of the some zoning ordinance passed in 1984 and is needed to provide raid -market housing (for rent and for sole] in North Kana in a centrally located area near existing infrastructure, including shopping, schools, and job centers, and easily accessible from existing main roads and utility grids. Royal Vfstcs Flawing Project Environmental Assessment 5 [this page Intentionally left blankl Royal Vistcs Fiow ng Project Environmentd Assessment a D= Figure I Project' Locution Map S, h. Roycif Vistas He u5ng Profert En vkonm antcV Assessment 7 Figure 2 Proposed Road a Ditches In Stantec rg,'tv 4:,1-1 ng !Qgo [lqrlh,-. Flu— 2 prow Wei 40out Oftri ENLOIRO tmh— 1. th. Roycif Vistas He u5ng Fr,ofert En vkonm antcV Assessment a Photo 1 Project Site; Mid-makai section (looking west) Photo 2 Projekt Site: MavkcT section (looking northeast) Roycif Vistas Heus+ng Fr,o ert EnvronmentcV Assessment Figure 3 Conceptual Building Layout RPycif Vistas Heus+ng Protect EnvronmentcV Assessment 10 Figure 4 Two -Story and Thus -Stay BVIldbag Schematic MIMMIX ............. .......... . . ....................... 1, 1 J, 1 101.1111. 1 I14Ip.1 I VIAA Roycif Vistas He u5ng Profert En vkonm entcV Assoss m e --.' 11 Figure 5 Concepts for Building Layout r. Ir. . 7.,. - P1 . ..py. I " .- Ivy " 1.r. Roycif Vistas He u5ng Profert En vkonm entcV Assessment 12 1.4 Environmental Assessment Process This Environmental Assessment {EA) process is being conducted in accord©nce with Chapter 343 of the HCawai'i Devised Statutes (HRS). This law, along with its Implementing regulations, Title 11, Chapter 200.1, of the Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), is the basis for the environmentall impact process in the State of Hawcai'i. Section 343-5, HRS established nine types of actions that "trigger'' compliance, The use of State or County lands is one of these "triggers." Since portions of the Proposed Project cross parcels (TMK () 7-6-21:18 and 19) that are controlled by the County of Havv&i DPW, compliance with HRS and HAR is required. According to Chapter 343, an EA is prepared to determine impacts associated with an taction, to develop mitigation rneasures for adverse impacts, and to determine whether any of the impacts are significant according to thirteen specific criteria. Part 4 of this document states the anticipated Finding of No Significant Impoct; Part S provides a review and analysis of the "Significance Criteria" defined in Section 12 of the Chapter 11-200.1, HAR. In the EA process, if the approving agency determines after considering comments to the Craft EA that no significant impacts would likely occur, then the agency issues a Finding of No Significant Impact 4FONSI), and the action is permitted to proceed to obtaining any other discretionary permits and approvals. It the agency concludes that significant impacts are expected to occur as a result of the proposed action, then an Environmental Impact Statement is prepared to analyze the impacts and identify mitigcafion. 1.5 Public Involvement and Agency Coordination The following agencies and organizations were consulted in development of the EA: Federal: National Park Service, Kaloko-Honokohau National Historical Park U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service State: Department of Education Department of Land and Natural Resources Department of Transportation Governor's Office State Historic Preservation Division Office of Hawaiian affairs Royal Vfstcs Housing Project a;nvironmentol Assessment 13 County: fvil Defense Agency County Council Department of Environmental Management Department of Parks and Recreation Department of Public works Department of Water Supply Fire Department Mass Transit Agency Planning Department Police Department riy ted Infer Pacific Motais Inc. Sierra Club Calvary Community Church of lona Dana `vistas Community Association Copies of communications received during early consultation are contained In Appendix 1 a and relevant aspects of reply letters are discussed in the text c,f the EA. Notice of the_avail_abili of the .Luft EA was pubf shed in the August Q., 2020._ and September 8. 2020, editions of the Environmental Notice. Appendix 1 b .� ,teo FQWm!ppt� Qo thp, UEOft EA aodresp.cz IQ��' �mrnents. Various sections of the EA have been modified to reflect input received in the ar ?I e i tte�ST Adc til nal or rr�adifiec no0--proLourol text is denotedin double underFnes, as in this poraaroph. Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Environmentol Assessment 14 PART 2: ALTERNATIVES 2.1 Proposed Project The action under consideration is described in Sections 1.1 to 1.3, obove. 2.2 No Action Under the leo Action Alternative, the Proposed Project would not be developed on the site and no ground disturbance associated with the Proposed Project would occur. Under this alternative, there would not be 450 multi -family units available in North Kona at this site. The site is owned by Kona Three, however, under this alternative the parcel could either be held or sold. The parcel could be developed as some other type of project or not be developed for sarne time. These options would not help the existing and growing mid-markeflarkforce population in Kana and if it Is developed, it is unknown whether it world be developed with both Rental and Sale units. Focusing development within the Kana Urban Area is a guiding princlple of the kora CDP. The no action alternative would fail to focus such uses and provide such improvements within the Kona Urban Area as prescribed by the Iona CDP. Also, under the no action alternative Policy TRAN 2,1: Connectivity Standards would not occur and there would be no roadway interconnectivity. 2.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated from Detailed Analysis Kona Three considered alternative building configurations, alternative building locations and numbers, alternative access, and different numbers of Renical and Sale units. Kana Three looked at building larger structures more like conventional high- density buildings with a heavier density (zoning of the land allows in excess of 600 units to be built) . However, it was decided that the larger structures did not match nearby communities, were less aesthetically pleasing, and would have more environmentol Impacts than the 450 units of "flats" and "courtyard" styles that are the style for the Proposed Project. Kana Three considered that the larger structures did not offer a lifestyle to the target market (both mental and Sale units) that is conducive to tarrily living on Hawai"i Island as compared to the "flats" and "courtyard style structures. Alternative design features were considered including wirier access roads and stand-alone rather than clustered structures, bort these features limited the amount of green space available for the Project. Kona Three's initial land plan �kno n then as "Kana Village") presented to the community and government officials in late 2018 included 260 of the 450E units contained in three-story buildings to help minimize ground disturbance. Access Royal Vrsfas housing Project Environmentc) Assessment 15 for the first phase of that pian was designed to be from Lake Street via Kekuana'aa Place, in Kona Vistas Phase IV, which would have eventually connected to Paulehic Street in Pualani states. Based on responses from members of the communities of Kana Vistas and Pualani Estates, Kana Three changed the name of the Project from Kona Village, reduced the estimated number of units in three-story buildings from 260 to 156 units (a 40 percent reduction), and moved the access for Phase I from Kekuana'oa Place to Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway- via a new un -signalized intersection (proposed to be built) , These changes were made in response to ccmrnunity concerns about 11 confusing the Project with the simiiar named "Kana Village Resort," 2) eliminating all three-story buildings on the maker portion of the Project site to reduce visual impacts to existing Kana Vistas residents, and 31 providing separate access to the Project from Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway to reduce and delay traffic impacts on the Lako Streef/Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway intersection as well as Traffic on Kekuana'oo Place. In response to community concerns, Kona Three also considered changing the zoning from Multiple -Family Residential, with a minimum building site of 5.000 square feet per dwelling unit (RM -5) to either Single -Family Residential District (minimum building site area of 10,000 square feet) (RS -10) or Single -Family Residential District minimum building site area of 15,000 square feet) (R5-15) for the development. However, rezoning to RS -10 or RS -15 world result in a development with homes similar to those already present In the vicinity, which would not meet the purpose and need for the Project to provide housing choices for various community sub -markets compared to the IRM -5 zoning, Additionally, if there were a change of zoning that resulted in a reduction of density of less than 450 units, then any left over water credits (whish have already been committed and paid far) would be effectively "last" since they cannot be transferred except to "adjacent" properties. Currently, there is no known plan by the owner to develop the adjacent property. These credits are difficult to obtain and cannot be transferred by County policy, except to adjoining properties. Not building on this site at the proposed density would effectively eliminate a housing project that serves the mid-market/workforce community in the Kansa area for the foreseeable future, since any othersimilar projects would depend on furtherwater improvements in Kona which is a process that would take years. Similarly, the extension of the County sewer system to this Project would allow leveraging Kona's limited amount of sewer capacity required for multi -family housing, in addition to providing the future opportunity to have surrounding, existing properties hook up to the extended sewer system to eliminate environmental contamination. Royal Atcs Housing Project Eravi mnmentol Assessment 16 In the end, none of the ether alternatives were found to be optimal for the property or the perceived demand in the market, or resulted in more environmentaM impacts than the Proposed Project and were eliminated from detailed analysis. Royal Vfstcrs Fiowing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 17 PART 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES, CUMULATIVE IMPACTS, ANIS MITIGATION !MEASURES 3.1 General Setting The two pokers ar)d location of the Project is referred to throughout this EA as the Project Site. The term Project Area is used to describe the general area of Forth Kona. The Project Site is located approximately 2.7 miles south of downtown Kailua-Kana on Queen Ka'ahurnanu Highway adjacent to Its intersection with Kuakini Highway. Archaeological studies indicate that the Project Site was used prior to Western contact for a variety of activities, leaving features associated with agriculture, habitation, burial, and transportation (SCS 2016). More recently, the Project Site wcs farmed for coftee and ranched since the early 1900s. The lower portion of the Project Site was still used to pasture cattle until August 2019; evidence of ranching including fencing, cattle walls, several corrals and cattle chutes are present. The Project Site and surrounding lands were bulldozed sometime between the 1940s and 1970s in preparation for a commercial agricultural project, most likely coffee growing. The Project is bounded to the north by undeveloped cattle pasture, to the east and south by residential subdivisions and by Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway to the west. lgpggraphy cat fihgEroiecj• 51t is consistent with the vicinity and is relatively steep, with elevations ranaina from approximately 330 feet above mean sea level to 900 feet amsl. ^ 3.2 Environmental Consequences This section of the EA includes Ca description of the environmental setting of the Project Site as well as the potential impacts from the Proposed Project and alternatives to the resources. Environmental consequences, both primary and secondary, and the cumulative as well as the short-term and long-term impacts are considered. Cumulative impacts are impacfs on the environment which results from the incremental impact of the action when added to ether past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions regardless of what agency or person undertakes such actions. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor, but collectively slgnificcnt, actions taking place over a period of fime. Cumula#ive impacts include the direct and Indirect impacts of a project together with the reasonably foreseeable future actions of others. Past projects in the vicinity of the Project Site have included the following: flood control projects for the Horseshoe Bead and Holualoo proinageways, urban residential development including Kona Vistas Phases 1 through 4; commercial development west of the Project Site (Scarlet Thread alteration shop, Power Self Storage-Kuakini) and south of the Project Site (Orchid Isle Auto Center); Royal Vrstus housing Project Enwronmentrc! Assessment 18 construction and use of the Calvary Community Church; as well as ❑ number of infrastructure projects including construction of the Lake Street-Kuakini Highway intersection, construction of the Leilon! Street extension, Pualoni Street extension, and Kilohana Street extension, and ongoing read maintenance and improvements. The nearest reasonably foreseeable future project is dedication of the three remaining roadway lets (Kona Three is currently working with the County of Hawaii DPW to accept dedication of these). The development of the affordable housing project located approximately 0.1 mile from the Proposed Project to be built by ethers, mokai of Kuakini Highway is also reasonably foreseeable. The affordable housing requirement was part of the original zoning ordinance (I 984] and is located on approximately 12 acres. Subject to approval by the OHCD, Kana Three's affiliate which awns the 12 acres would deed the parcel to the County or their nominee to satisfy a portion of the affordable housing development requirement, and the homes would be built by qualified affordable housing developers. If QHCD decides not to pursue can affordable housing pLpiec# of this location, Kona Three would negotiate a new agreement with OHCD to satisfy the requirement of the zoning ordinance using options such as dedicating some of the Praiect's units for affordable housing, provid!n6 affordable housing elsewhere offsite in Kona, acgulrinq afford_abJe housing credits from another location in Kana, or a combination of these optiorns. In the Traffic Impact Analysis Reoc;rt (TIAR) prepared for the Project (Appendix 2), future road improvements include the ,widening of Kuakini Highway from Henry Street to Karnehameha III Road by two travel lanes as well as bicycle facilities and sidewalks. The Eike Plan Hcawai`i also identifies a signed shared road on Kuakini Highway from Lako Street to Hualalai Road, and a signed shared read on Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway from henry Street to Kucklni Highway, 3.3 Physical Environment 3.3.1 Climate, Georgy, Sails, and Geologic Hazards Environmental Setting The Project Site has an elevation that varies from 330 feet carnsl to 900 feet amsl and receives an average annual rainfall of between 35 and 38 inches, increasing in the mcauko direction ( iambelluca et al. 2013). The geologic substrate on most of the Project Site is soil -covered pohoehoe lava flows from Hualalai dated between 5,O00 and 10,000 years in age (Wolfe and orris 1996). Sail in the Project Sile is classified as WaJoha medial silt loom (Map Unit Symbol 243). on 2 to 10 or 10 to 20 percent slopes, depending on location Royal Vistas lousing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 19 (NRCS 2019). This sail forms on ash -covered pchoehoe flows and has a 10- to 25 - inch depth to bedrock. It is well drained but also has a high runoff potential (Soto eta 1. 1973). Hawaii Island is subject to geologic hazards, such as lava flogs and earthquakes. However, the Project Site appears to be stable with no evidence of subsidence or landslides_ Volcanic hazard as assessed by the U.S. Geological Survey in this area of North Kana is Zone 4, on a scale of ascending risk from 9 to 1 (Holiker 1990). The hazard risk is based on the fact that Hualalai has steep slopes and is the third most historically active volcano an the island. Volcanic hazard Zane 4 areas have about 5 percent of their land area covered by lava or ash flows since the year 1800 and less than 15 percent of their land area covered by lava in the past 750 years. They are at lower risk than Zane 3 areas because the frequency of Hucalalai eruptions is lower than those of Kilauea and Mauna Loa. The Island of Hawal`i experiences high seismic activity caused by eruptive process within active volcanoes or by deep structural adjustments due to the weight of the islands on Earth's underlying crust lUSGS 2019a�. Although the earthquakes are seldom large enough to cause widespread damage, they can produce locally extensive ground fractures and subsidence (USGS 2019b). For example, the 6.6 magnitude earthquake that occurred in 2006 centered just off the northwest snare of Hawaii Island resulted in widespread damage to buNdings and roods in Kona. impacts crud Mitigation Measures Geoloclic Hazards In general, geologic conditions do not impose undue constraints on the Project Site. Building design will meet all €appropriate seismic standards ensuring safety for the future residents. Climate Chancre According to the EPA, global climate change could mean arise in sea level that could woxsen Ha ai'I's existing coastal hozards, including waves, hurricanes, and tsunamis, and extreme tides (EPA. 2016). Of the morn -made greenhouse gases, the greatest contribution currently comes from CO2 emissions. Through complex interact ons on a regional and global scale, these greenhouse gas emissions and net losses of biological carbon sinks (i.e„ vegetation) cause a net warrning effect of the atmosphere, primarily by decreasing the amount of heat energy radiated by the earth knack into space. Although greenhouse gas levels have varied for millennia, recent industrialization and burning of fossil carbon sources have Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 20 caused greenhouse gas concentrations to increase dramatic-clly and are o passible contributor to overall global climatic changes (I PCC 2007). Potential changes to Hawal`i resulting from the affects of climate change include higher than normal temperatures, contraction or expansion of existing vegetation species distribution, the expansion of the range of existing invasive species populations, and the introduction of new pathogens and invasive species. decrease in prevailing northeasterly trade winds, decline in rainfall and increased variability in rainfall patterns, increased ocean acidity, sea level rise, and threats to human health (University of Hawaii at Mdnca Sea Grant College Program 2014). The State of Hawal`i in Hawaii Revised Statutes §226-109 identifies priorities to prepare the State to address the impacts of climate change. Also, Title 1 1-200.1-1 3 includes significance criteria to consider in environmental impact analysis that includes the hazardousness of sea level rise including: 1 j the potential effects of a proposed action on climate change as indicated by assessing greenhouse gas emissions in a qualitative, or if reasonable, quantitative way; and 2) the effects of climate change on a proposed action and its environmental impacts. It recommends that agencies consider the short- and long-term effects and benefits in the alternatives and mitigation analysis in terms of climate change effects and resiliency to the effects of a changing climate. Figure 6 illustrates that the Project's elevation of more than 300 feet above amsl and 0.85 -mile distance from the coast protects the site from sea level rises of 3. feet, which could occur as early as the 2060s (PaclOOS 2017). The Project's design including surface runoff drainage plans address the potential impact from flooding that could occur if increased variability in rainfall patterns Occur. A more detailed description of flood and drainage plans are described in Section 3.3.2. Potential impacts to climate charge from the Project include direct impacts from emissions of greenhouse gases during construction and occupation at the proposed development related to the consumption of fuels (combustion) and indirect impacts from greenhouse gas emissions associated with electrical power consumption. Since the Project addresses an existing demand for housing, it is expected that a portion of the residents that would occupy the development already lige in Kana or on Hclwai'i Island, and there would not be a substantial increase In emissions when residents occupy the Project. Therefore, Project impacts would be considered a negligible increase to the global annual greenhouse gas emissions. Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Project would not be constructed, and the site would remain unchanged from current conditions. There would be Royal Vfstcs Fiowing Project Eravironmentol Assessment 21 no grange in impacts to climate, or from geologic conditions or seismic activity, under fhis alternative. Figure 6 Sea Leve! Rise Exposure Map + UVW YNI,NN�AN�t Tl �''1 „li'f .rtilNibi b }7Tµ NtiLMi15 . 1 ks, 1 "iR:AlLJ.7 Cumulative Impacts Since there aro no impacts from the Proposed Project, there are no anticipated cumulative Impacts from the Proposed Project in combinoticn with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions to these resources. 3.3.2 Flood Zones and Drainage Existing Environment The Project Site is located approximately 0.8.5 miles from the ocean at elevations ranging from 330 to 900 feet omsl, outside the area affected by coastal flooding. The area of North Kana includes a series of narrow drainageways that flow to the ocean. Two intermittent drainage ays are located adjacent to the proposed development on the parcels managed by the County of Hawai `i DPW, Horseshoe Bend and Holualoo Draincageways. The Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMAIs) Mood Insurance mate Map (FIRM) 1551660952F (9/29/2017) shows the Project Site and proposed development is in Flood Zone X, and part of the Project Site is in the 0.2% onnual chance floodplain (Figure 7). Horseshoe Bend and Holualoo Drainageways, cross Royal Vistas housing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 22 and are adjacent to the Project Site, are located in Special Flood Hozard Areas (SFHAs) Zone AE. lane AE is defined as areas inundated by flood having a 1% probability of being equaled or exceed in any given year (base flood) and the floodways are in lone AEF. These drainages merge maker` of Queen Ka'cahumanu Highway. Channelizatlon of much of both Horseshoe Bead and Holualoo Drainages was planned starting in 1976 (Master Plan for Kona Flood Control Project for the County of Hawaii DPW by Stonley S. Shirnobnkuro & Associates), but, not completed. The County installed a lined drainageway just south of the Alii Kai subdivision and a basin to contain the flow from this channel, but the mouka end of the channel ended below Kupunci Street. During the extension of Queen Ka'cahumanu Highway (downstream of the Project) in the early 1980s, the State of Haail constructed culverts for the Holualoo Drainageway and the Horseshoe Bend Drainage ey under Queen Kca'ahumanu Highway to direct flow under this major arterial. Culverts were also constructed under Kuakini Highway by the State for the Holualoo Dminageway; however, the culverts that were proposed under County -owned Kuakini Highway for the Horseshoe Bend Drainagewcay waters were never constructed. As a result, during heavy rain everts flooding occurs across Kuakini Highway which flaws dawn and impacts Kuakini Highway and the residents makai of Kuakini Highway�� all dc2wnstr g,I2f,rQ.m thg Pr je J. Holuealoa Orainageway and Horseshoe Bend Drainagewoy waters have a confluence at the mokai end of the 12 acres, downstream of 1h Project. working with the County, the prevlous developer of the Project assisted in obtaining private property owners' co-operation to achieve land use rights that allow the confluence to feed into the County channel. The current developer is no processing a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) with the FEMA to further channelize the portion of Holucaloa Drcainageway that crosses the 12 acres to allow more safe and efficient transfer of these flood waters. This channelizaticn protects, the lands to god m akai of this work from flood exposure as well as further implementing Phase II a( the County of Ha cai'i's Master Florid Control Plan. It also tallows more efficieni development of the 12 acres into residential use in a safe manner. These draincagewoys continue to act as runoff distribution and flood control and molt recently, the Effective FIRM leffective September 2017) increased thE: Q (estimated flow) within the Holualoo Drainage ay, including the section within the County -owned ditch adjacent to the Project Site. To help rnitiaate tine existing dow t.reaM flooding concerns, several optlons for Maigot1ge are being considered in the vicinity of the Project Site in conjunction with ti ie County of Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Erivironmentc l Assessment 23 Hawaii DPW. Multiple comments on the Draft EA were regarding what the raing2t irr pr e e s cold k�e er, - 1 � Th. c,Lgnt[Q1 _op.tom_ fQr addressing the flooding that have been previously discussed include: f l 1 Nie Cp�jnLs disposal of TMK 7-_6.-Q21,:Q18. to Kana three for we in tl�e c[ ar inage improvements, 12l dive ting some or all of the Horseshoe Bend flow into the Halualog Ditch. (31 installation of a retention ba5inf51 and or ! cQwnstreorr� culvert: and (41 leave the drainages in their current configuration with on-site imoroverraents within the existing drainnae hCOndodes. The final desion could future coordination with DPW. The State of Hawai`ir Department of Land and Natural Resources Flood Assessment Tool shows the Project Site outside the area that should be evacuated during a tsunami warning (http://gls.howaiinfip.org/that/, accessed December 019). No known areas of local (non -stream or ocean related) flooding are present at the Project Site. Figure 7 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRM Map :i 5 A. I I� l'I wln_I Sdr. Ai tl 41ehlPFll`II YGG -1pau �� 5tantec arcL n�raor 111'. Flood r&Unl ZNM rA41 Ad—t)o wHrN-., L�c:�•..i'• 9. 2% A— .1 :'harry :Yarn H.V OM F41JY- Cuoc{ Mm 144 A., .pl 14gWAwn -bra} LAWWO G h::d HATWd Plow* 7 ^sF.�al erl'.uL 41—c 06 ilex ..d 91�C.. L. FEA A VQPIJ 4e+e Royal Vfstcs Flaw ng Project Erivironmentol Assessment 24 impacts and Mitigation Measures ,omm,ent5..Qrt.th _Qrgff. EA. In, .uir c� :r: t;�,t I;.:adinc� and dLuin.c. . mprQ,,, m. nt (Appendix 1 bl. The Project would be requir�--d to fallow County regulations and policies related to flood control and drainage, among them Chapter 27 of the Hawaii County Code. Chapter 27 requires the difference Between pre - development and post -development runoff to be contained onsite, limiting impacts. A drainage study will be prepared and reviewed and approved by the County of Hawai'i DPW, which wm tjd b.Q. the r in permit process. As part of this requirement, the amount of expected runoff would be cu ated according__ to DPW standards and th 5e calculations wouldinclude he effects of the grogosed nroiect. As required by Charter 27, storm water 5hQUId in drvwells infiltrQfjQn k @c ns, car ether a rived in lfratiQn mth eods_ [Section 27-20,fell. Implementation of the approved Drainage Flan would ensure that runoff from the Project Site would not be directed toward adjacent propedies and the develc oment would not alter the general drainage pattern abgve or belo..lhe dvelo men't [Sectigri 2Z -20(e)).. The Project does not propose to impact the existing flows within the Horseshoe or Holualoo Droinageways ether than to channelize portions of the Horseshoe Bead Drainageway where it sheet flows and as needed to address downstream flooding issues once the options are analyzed and a solution is approved. Kona Three would coordinate with County of Hawai'i DPW and FEMA on the CLQ,'wIIR discussed above, which proposes to re -locate the Flood Zone (Zone AEF) within the new flood control channels; therefore, no Project -related surface disturbance associated with grading, parking, and landscaping would occur within the Flood Zone. Kono Three will continue working with the County to alleviate the downstregn-i flooding issue caused by the lack of culverts under Kuokini Highway; however, these issues would not be exacerbated by the Project. The final design cf the improvement projects for the Horseshoe Beni and Holualoo Draincges would be developed by Kana Three in coordination with the County of Hawaii DPW. Completion of the drainage system improvements is required prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the Project. A identified potentiol impacts to exisfing culverts f Appendix 1 b7. There would be nQs bona to ` Jc)a.�;ulvQrt5 Qr t wgll gt i rs , [ with Queen Ka'ahurranu. The proor�sed intersection (discussed in Secticn 3.7.21 has been desianed to avoid all imp_cLats io e ist_r ± averts and headwr�ail within the highway right-of-wo Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Project would not be constructed and the site would remain unchanged from current conditions, There would be Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Environmentol Assessment 25 no impacts to flood zones under this alternative and improvements to the drainages to reduce flooding of downstream properties would not occur. Cumulative Impacts Since there are no impacts associated with flood zone exposure from the Proposed Project, there are no anticipated cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project in combo notion with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions to flood zones. 3,3.3 Water Quality and Water Quantity Existing Envrron,menf Groundwater The State Commission on Water Resource Management ('CNRM) classification of aquifers locates this part of Kona wittiln the Keauhou Aquifer System of the Hualalai Aquifer Sector. The Project Site is not located above any of the nine Principal or Sole -Source aquifers identified in the U.S. EPA's Region 9 (https://archive.epa.gov/region9/water/arci-)ive/web/htmi/ssa.htm1, accessed on-line December 2019). Water commitments for the Proposed Project have been secured from the [AWS and fully paid for all the multi-fornily residential units through Keauhou Source Agreement commitments and Kealakekua Source Agreement commitments. According to a letter received during early consultation, the Project Site is served by an existing service that can accommodate a 4 -inch meter on `la Place, and is limited to 180,400 gallons per day, or 451 units of water. The demand for the Project is expected to be 180,400 ,gallons per day, which is included in the Department of Water Supply's calculation of Authorized Plan Use. Landscaping is planned for the project Site as well, and water use for landscaping is accounted for in the water credits. Surface Waters The Project Site is approximately 0.85 miles from the Pacdflc Ocean and has no nearby surface water bodies or waters of the U.S. According to maps from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, confirmed by field Inspection, no wetlands are present on the Project Site fhttp://wwvv.fws.gov/wetlands/Dota/Mopper.html). The Wal'aha Stream is the nearest riverine habitat card is located approximately one mile north of the Project. Royal Vistas lousing Project Environments) Assessment 26 Impacts ❑nd Mitigation Measures Potential impacts from the Project could occur to water quality during land clearing and construction activities from erosion and sedimentation.. These impacts would be minimized since grading of the Project Site during construction would be conducted in accordance with the grading peri -nit which would be issued by Haai"i County. Prior to the initiation of construction for the Proposed Project, Kona three would ensure that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit is in place. The permit would require best management practices (BMPs) to minimize erosion and for stormwater pollution prevention. Oversight of the BMPs would be conducted weekly for the duration of construction, with updates and corrective actions documented and transmitted to the Mate Department of Health, Clean Water Branch. Additionally, all earthwork and grading would confornn with Chapter 10 - Erasion and Sedimentation Control - of the Hawaii County Code. The intent is for the Proposed Project to collect and convey stormwater runoff into multiple onsite seepage pits with sizing based on a 1 0 -year, 1 -hour rainfall event. Based on the initial concept plan shown on Figure 3, a portion of the Project Site would be landscaped, including two parks in Phase 1, and the rest of the site would consist of buildings, parking areas, and roads. Water runoff from parking lots, driveways, and other surfaces would be treated to rn nirnize potential impacts to inland and coastal waters using standard stormwater pollution prevention technology. The specific technology, or combination of technologies, that would be implemented for the Project would be identified during the final design. Where feasible, the Proposed Project would include water efficient fixtures and provide water -saving recommended measures for residents. To minimize water demand, the Project would minimize landscaping and use xeriscape landscaping where landscaping is installed_ In addition, the Proposed Project aims to implement and balance xeriscape with the prevision of safe and adequate recreational space for residents. The Project would utilize reclaimed or reuse water for landscaping, if passible. No impacts to groundwater are expected from generation of wastewater since the Projectwould tie in with the County's sewer system. Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Project would not be constructed and the site would remain unchanged from current conditions. There would be no impacts to water quality under this alternative. Cumulative impacts Royal Vistcs Housing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 27 The relevcnt past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects for cumulative impacts are, described in Section 3.2. Each project has or could result In depletion of water quantity and impacts to wetter quality, including depletion of available groundwater, sedimentation or nutrient loading to surface water and groundwater. The issue comes not from the impacts of or individual project, but cumulative impacts in the region. As described above, impacts to water quality and water quantity from the Proposed Project would be negligible. Therefore, the cumulative impacts of the Proposed Project in combinatlon with post, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions care expected to be mirror_ 3.3.4 Flora, Fauna, and Eaosysfenns Existing Envtranment Vecgelafion A survey for biological resources was conducted by Geornetriclan Associaies for the Project Site (Appendix 3). The pre -human vegetation in the Project Site w05 likely Lowland DryfMesic Forest, which likely consisted of an open canopy forest dominated by a vide variety of trees, shrubs, herbs, vines, and terns. However, current vegetation at the Project Site includes introduced species that are common throughout Kona and include the non-native [-mole koa (Leuccreno leucocephala). opiuma (Pithecellobium duice), and guinea grass (Megafhyrsus Maximus). The Project Site includes two vegetation types that are distinguished primarily by previous management activities. The higher elevation portion of the Project Site contains few cattle, is intensely overgrown with guinea grass, and could be described as a scattered forest or thick savanna dominated by koa haale, opiuma, and rnonkeypod (Samonea soman) . The lower elevation portion of the Project Site is moderately grazed and has a very similar but slightly more diverse; canopy, including kiawe (Prosapis pollida), klu (Acacia Fornesiona), and several other nonnative trees. The understory In both vegetation types include: a diversity of non-native grasses, herbs, shrubs and vines, with a very few natives, including `uhaloa (Waltherla indica) and `[lima (Sida fallax). Although two drainageways traverse they property, no aquatic or true riparian vegetation is present in the Project Site. All plant species found on the property during the survey etre fisted In Table 1. Of the 46 species detected. six were indigenous (dative to the HawCai[an Islands and elsewhere] and only three were endem c (fcund only in the Hawaiian Islands). No rare, threatened, or endangered plant .species were present in the Project Site. Royal Vistas housing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 28 Table I Plant Species Observed in the Project Site Scientific Name Ferns Nephrolepis multiflora Phymatosorus grossus Flowering Plants Abutilon grondifotitim Acac; a fornesiano AlecJrites mcuccona Amaranthus virldis 8idens aibC7 Bidens cynapiifotia .,Ijens pifoso �uesa!pir��a dec��efaic:r i_ fl [7 r?-i���ri.5�C7 r?iCJi1C7r15 {_i1Cdt?iG7a5yCE' lima Chamaesyce hyperic cho Chods barboto Coccirsfa grandis Crotataria sig. Cynadon dactylon Desrnc?nthJus virgatus Dig i'o a cih aris I,i,'oria fnsularrs 5 e tigercr Dysphemia carinoto Eleu5irle indica Eragrostis tenefto .Hyp fis pectnate !r idignfera sufFry tic pso innato Leucaena levicecephoIcr s r,urr coromondeUanum Megothyrsus rnaxirnus Me�infs regens Merremio FuberasQ Mimosa pudica 'v!c�:rvr�liccr Ct7U'r�f'rti� loetida hysterophorys ynthus debilJs Family Polvoodiaceae Molvoceae Fabaceae Euphorbiaceae ArnaranWaceae Asteroceae Asteraceae Asteraceae Scrophulariacece F a bo e ecce Fabaceae EuphorblCaceae Euohorblaceae Cucurbii a eoe Fabaceae Poaceae Fabaceae Poaceae Poaceae Poaceae Chenopodiaceae Podce,�ae Poaceae Lamiacece Fobacec Canvolvuiaceae Crassulaceae Verberi accoe L arniaceae Fabaceae Maivcaceoe Poacene Poaceae Convolvulaceae Fabaceae Rubiaceae Astercacecie Passifloraceae Eupmorbiaceae Common Name Life Status* Farre Sword fern -e r A iaile scented fern =erg: A. Abufi±cn ;,4 Kukui Slender amaranth Beonar's tick Blue bidens Beggar's tick Buddleia 'Wcj`_a-bit Partridge pee Garden s2urge Graceful Spurge Swollen finaercaras Crotalaria Bermuda grass Slender rf ir•nosc Crabgrass Sourgrass Crobgrass Dysphania Goose grass Lovegross Corrals hyptis it d,IAo Obscure mornin Air plant Lantana Lion's ear Hoole koa False mallow Guinea grass Natal redtop Woodrose Sleeoina earass wile pilau Santa McJria l_rlikoi nN iruri Shrub Shrub Herb Herb Herb Herb Shrub V i rtie -err} ",arc era Vine Herb Herd Shrvb Herm Herb Herb Herb Herb Hs,rb Shrub Shrub Vine Hera Shrub f:erb Shrub Herb Herb Heat Vine Herb Vine Vine Fie =-era A. Royal Atcs Flowing Project ErIvircarrmentol Assessment 24 Scientific Name Pltop-_-� Labrum deice - Family Fobaceae Common Name Dulce Life farm Tree status* A Plurnbc o auricufata Plurnba inoceoe ieodwert Shrub A r-,)rnba ca ne kinico Plumbs inaceoe Ilie"e HeTb I Portulcrca !bSO PQrtulacaceae PortulaccT Herb A proso is PaNda Fabaceae Kiawe Tree A Psidirrrra g uojovo M rtaceae Common guova Tree A f:,'cinu-5 communis Eu horbiaceae Castor bean Shrub A Rivina humilis Ph tolaccaceae Carel berry Hera A Sornanea soman Fabaceae Morikeypod Tree A cls ^us lerebinthirolius Anocardaceae Christmas beEy Tree A act, c,,Acica<en*a s Fab aceae Coffee senna Shrub A ;i d� 'u x %!Oceae irr7ca Shrub I _._.............................................................................................._ &_,''J i__rVinolfolfu Ma aceae C Sada ""' rFJ A 5 Jc- s inasra Ma vane ae Sida -erb A $OlCrnlrfYi r, ncon Lem solo oceae F opoio -ero I Sc7brlum seafor thiarrum So cnaceae Vining sca onunl � aerb A _�or;chus oferraceus Asteraceae Saw thist'e Herb A Spcathadea ccamparauJcato ,noriioceoe Bic, African tulip Tree A T heveh'n peruvioncr Apoc naceae Be-soil tree free A Thr+r+':,r=: `rca raps gra ..Iernboidea Acanthaceae White thunber is Fine A Ti iaceQe 13ur brush Shrub a. indica 5terculiaceae 'Uhaloo Herb I J:-_, I. E = endemic, I = indigenous, Pi = Poiyrkesican, END = Federal and Stole Listed _:'it. -fingered (none) An online mopping too[ provided by the USFWS indicates that no designated or proposed critical habitat for endangered plant (or animal) species is located. on or near the property (USFWS 2019). The nearest desicgnoted critical plant habitat is for endangered haho (Cyanea h arnaNJcrca ssp. carlsc nU) approximately seven miles northeast of the Project Site. Blackburn's Sphinx doth The one endangered insect found In many parts of Kona is the Blackburn's sphinx. moth (Manduco blcackburnfi). It is generally associated with drier environments and `a'a substrates. The native hast plant aiea (Nothocestrum spp.) is extremely rare, but a substitute host, the prolific weed tree tobacco (Mcotiona glcauco), quickly colonizes dry, disturbed lava flaws. Neither hast was Bound within the survey area. Birds The 15 species of birds detected during the survey were all non-native and typical of these found in similar areas of lowland disturbed habitat in Iona (Table 2� . The most common species encountered were spotted dove (Streptopelia chinensisj, Royal Vfstcs !Mowing Project rrravircanmentol Assessment 30 northern cardinal (Cardlnclis cardinafis), cattle egret (Bubulcus ibis), parakeet (Aratingo sp.), Japanese white -eye (Zosterops japonicus), and house finch (Carpodacus mexiconus) . No native birds were detected, and it is generally poor habitat for most native birds. The short -eared owl may utilize habitat at the Project Site and vicinity for foraging. The trees in the survey area erre generally too short to serve as typical Howalian hawk (Bufeo safitariusj nests, but individuals could forage at least occasionally in the area. Table 2 Bird Species Observed In the Project Site Sclenflfic Nome Common Name Statin Acridofheres tristis Common Myna Alien resident Aratfrigo Sip. Parckeet Allen resident BuWcus ibis Cc-tle egret Alien resident Card,'no.'s Northern cardind Alien resident Carpodcrcus mexicanus House finch Alien resident FroncoJP nus c ndecerianus Black frcancolin Alien resident Geopelfa stricto Zebra dove Alien resident Leiothrix lutea Red -milled leicthrix Alien resident Lonchura punctuloto Nutrnera mannikin Alien resident Paddo oryziYora Java s orro w Alien resident Passer darrresticLOS House sparrow Alien resident 5erinw mozamUcus Yellowy -fronted ccrqry Alien resident sta 1; fraveoaa Saffron finch Alien resident 5,� ,-ta efio chinensis spqtfed doves Alun resident Zosters s -o cnicus Japanese white -eye Alien resident A number of other rare, threatened, and endangered birds are fairly unlikely to be found at the Project Site and vicinity. The Hawiaiiar goose or nene (8rionto .scandvicensis) is can endemhc, federahly listed endangered species that is only occasionally observed in urban Kona, although it is more abundant at Big Island Country Club in the Kekaha region of Kona. Some endangered Hawaiian petrels (Pterodrom+a sondwichensis or `ua`u) and band-rurnped stcrrn-petrels (Oceanodroma castro), as well as threatened Newell's shearwaters (Puffinus aurtcufaris neweffi), may overfly the area between the months of ,June and October. All three of these pelagic seabird species nest high in the mountains in burrows. Most recently (November 20]9) a Hawaiian petrel burr=ow and chick were observed in a newly documented "ua'u colony inside the Pu`u C Umi Natural Reserve Area on Kohalcr Mountain. There is no suitable nesting habitat for any of these secibird species within or near the Project- Site. The primary cause of mortality in all these seabird species in Ha cai`i is thought to be predation by alien mommallan species of the nesting colonies. Collision with man-made structures is another significant cause. Nocturnally flying seabirds, especially fledglings on their way to sea In the summer Royal Vfstcs Fiowing Project Environmentol ,Assessment 31 and fall, can become disoriented by exterior lighting. Wh!!.-r.. :..'s.Driented, seabirds may collide with manmade structures. If they are not Killed -.�:.) right, the dazed or injured birds are easy targets of opportunity for feral mammals. Although not a listed species, the Hawaiian endemic sub -species of the short -eared oval or pueo (Alio flammeus sandwichensis), a protected migratory bird, nests and hunts in tall grasslands and shrublands and could conceivably be occasionally present at the Project Site. Hawaiian Hocary Bat The endangered Hawaiian hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereas sernotus), the only native Hawaiicn Icnd mammal, may utilize the property, as it is found in most areas on the island of Ho aH and has been observed in surrounding areas with similar vegetation. It was not observed in our survey, which took place in daylight and did not use any detection equipment, but it should be presumed present. Bats may forage for flying insects over portions of the property on a seasonal basis, and they may find some of the larder shrubs and trees (bath exotic and native) suitoble roosting habitat. Hawaiian hoary lacus are vulnerable to disturbance during the summer pupping season. Introduced Mammals, Reptiles, and Amphibians The only live mornnnols seen during the survey were cattle (Bos fo irus), feral pigs (Sus.scrofa) which were cbundcnt in the survey area, and small Indian mongooses (Herpestes a. ouropunctotus). Given the Project's location in an urban area, it is likely that feral cats {Fefis catus), mice (Mus spp.), rats (Rattus spp.), and domestic dogs, (Canis f famiYaris) are occasionally present. Ther; are no native terrestrial reptiles or amphibians in Hawaii_ The only reptile observed during the survey was the day gecko (Pheisurna sp.). it is likely that other species of gecko, angles, and skinks are also present. No amphibians were seen or heard. None of these alien mammals or reptiles have conservation value and all are deleteriaus to native flora and fauna_ Impacts and Mitigation Measures Vegetatlon As discussed above, no threatened or endangered plant species as listed by the USFWS appear to be present in the Project Site, nor are there uniquely valuable habitcat5. No existing or proposed federally designated critical plant (or animal) habitat is present in the Project Site. There cappeors to be no potential to adversely affect rare, threatened, or endangered plant species. Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Eravironmentol Assessment 32 Although existing vegetation would be cleared during Project construction activities including grading, the plants that would be removed are all non-native_ Landscaping is an important aspect for housing developments both for residents' experience and property value. The Proposed Project would plaint new vegetation as part of landscaping following Project construction. As requested In an early consultation letter from DLNR, Kona Three would plant native or non- invasive trees os part of landscaping for the Proposed Project. Blockburn's Sphinx Moth In order to prevent potentic6 impacts to the Blackburn's sphinx moth, the Proposed Project would include the following protection measures. A biologist familiar with the species would survey for Blackburn's sphinx math and its larval host plants (tree tobacco and native `oieo) between November and April or several weeks after a significant rain and within four to six weeks prior to construction. Surveys should include searches for eggs. larvae, and signs of larval feeding (chewed sterns, frass, or leaf damage). If moths or native `aiea or tree tobacco over three feet are found during the survey, liana Three would coordinate with the USFWS for guidance to avoid impacts. If no Blackburn's sphinx math. "aiea, or tree tobacco are found during pre - disturbance surveys, Kona Th fee would ensure that measures are taken to avoid attraction of Blackburn's sphinx moth and prohibit tree tobacco from entering the site. Tree tobacco can grow more than three feet in approximately six weeks, and above three feet in height the tree tobacco can become a hast plant for Blackburn's sphinx wroth. The Proposed Project would remove tree tobacco less than three feet tall and monitor the Project Site for new tree tobacco grown before, during, and after Project construction. Mon1toring for tree tobacco after construction, con be completed by any staff, such as regular maintenance crew, provided with pictures of tree tobacco at different life stages. Birds If construction for the Project is scheduled to occur in the Hawaiian hawks breeding season (between March 1 and September 30), a qualified biologist would conduct a pre -disturbance survey for hawk nests within and irnrnediately adjacent to the property.. If a Hawaiian hawk nest is located during the pre - disturbance nest survey, no land clearing or construction should occur within 1,600 feet of any active Hawailan hawk nest during the breeding season until the young have fledged (usually October. Regardless of time of year, Kona Three would coordinate with the prior to trimming or cufting trees with Hawaiian hawk nests, as nests may be re -used during consecutive breeding seasons. Royal Vfstcs Flaw ng Project Environmentol Assessment 33 The Proposed Project would not involve any unshielded lighting for either construction or operation, in conformance with Hawai'i County Code § 14-- 50 et seq, which would avoid impacts to nocturnally flying Hawaiian petrels and Newell's shearwaters, Additionally, during operation the site would use lighting only where and when it is needed for safety purposes. The use of outdoor lamps with warmer calors (less blue light) and energy efficient fixtures would be considered when the building is being constructed. Subject to local rules and reQuIations.would utili7ev i scale in response: LQ--apublic comment received on the Draft EA reQardlr�c potential impacts to astronomy If the Proposed Project incorporates additional outdoor lighfing, it may attract threatened and endangered Hawaiian seabirds, which may became disoriented by the lighting, resulting in birds beim downed. To avoid the potential downing of these threatened and endangered seabirds due to interaction with outdoor lighting, no construction using unshielded equipment maintenance lighting should be permitted after darks between the months of April and October. All additional permanent lighting should conform to the Hawaii County Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (Ha al'l County Code Chapter 9, Article 14), which requires shielding of exterior lights so as to lower the ambient glare caused by unshielded lighting. The Proposed Project would also avoid nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 15 through December 15. Ha aiiar) Haory Fact The enclangered Ha alkan hoary bat is vulnerable to disturbance while roosting with its juveniles in the pupping secson. To minimize impacts during construction, woody plants taller than 15 feet would not be removed or trimmed during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). Additionally, Hawaiian hoary bests forage for insects from as low as 3 feet to higher than 500 feet above the ground and can became entangled in barbed wire, if used for fencing. The Proposed Project would not use barbed wire for fencing. Marine Seaecies Factors that might impair urban Kona's coastal water quality and potentially affect threatened or endangered marine species are wastewater, chemical contaminants from industrial and commercial uses, and polluted runoff from streets and parking lots. Runoff from the drainageways in the Project Site could reach the ocean; however, the runoff from the Project would not be directed into the drainogeways or increase flow during flood events. Potential impacts to water quality would be minimized through wastewater and stormwoter trentments described in Section 3..3.2 and 3.3.3. Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Eravrrcmnmentol Assessment 34 Addiflonal Impacts A njix of native species, Polynesian introduced species, and non-invasive introduced ornamentals would be used in landscaping for the Project Site and an invasive weed control plan for the Project Site would be developed to minimize impacts from fire -prone, ron-native vegetation species. Additionally, where no gracing or grubbing is required, existing vegetation would be left in place. Biosecurity protocols during construction would include cleaning and inspection of construction equipment for invasive species (including insects, frogs, rats, and mice), and would be applied as applicable. A comment from DOFAW recommended comulfing with AQ WQQJ Invo5iV2IISC Appendix 1 b). The developer would also request current recommendations from 31 C at the time Linder the No Action Alternative, the Project would not be constructed and the site would remain unchanged from current conditions. There would be no vegetation removed, and, therefore, no impacts to the native plant species present in the Project Site or removal of potential habitat fcr protected wildlife species. However, there would be no invasive weed control plan in place under this alternative, and existing weeds ❑t the Project Site would continue to spread at the Project Site. curnulattve Impacts Past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects in the vicinity have impacted biological resources through alteration of the landscape through introduction of weeds, removal of native vegetation, and loss of habitat for native wildlife species. Impacts to biological resources from the Proposed Project would be minor, due to the limped number of native species present at the Protect Site and the protection measures outlined to avoid impacts to Federally -listed species and prevent spread of non-native weeds. Therefore, the cumulative impacts of the Proposed Project in combinctior with past, preseni, end reasonably foreseeable future actions are expected to be Minor. 3.3.5 Noise E n viro n m en to I Setfing Raise on the Project Site is law to moderate, the main source of noise at the site is traffic traveling on Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway, Royal Vistas housing Project Environmentc) Assessment 35 The mise descriptor used to assess environmental noise by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUa) is the day -night average A -weighted (dBA) sound level (DIAL). DNL is a representation of the average noise during a typical day of the year. DNL levels of 55 or less are typical of quiet, rural or suburban areas. DNL exposure levels of 55 to 65 are typical of urbanized areas with medium to high levels of activity and street traffic. DNL exposure levels above 65 are representative of dense urban sates and areas near large hi+ghoys or airports. Administrative Rules for the Department of Health, Chapter 11-46, Community Noise Control set permissible noise levels to provide for the prevention, control, and abatement of noise pollution in the state. The Project Site is zoned Multiple- Fomily Residential 5,000 square feet (RM -5). Multi -family dwellings are in a Class B zoning district defined by HAIR § 11-46-3. The maximum permissible sound level in a Class B zonincg. district Is 60 dBA from 7:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. and 50 dBA from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. (HAR § 1 1 -46-4). Various agencies have different standards of noise compatibility. Per 24 CFI 51.103. HUD exterior standards are as follows: • Acceptable (DNL not exceeding 65 dBA): The noise exposure may be of some concern but common building constructions will make tree indoor environment acceptable and the outdoor environment will be reasonably pleasant for recreation and play, • Normally Unocceptoable (DNL above 65 but not exceeding 75 dBA): The noise exposure is significantly more severe, barriers may be necessary between the Project Site and prominent noise sources to rroke the outdoor environment acceptable: special building constructions may be necessary to ensure that people indoors are sufficiently protected from outdoor noise. • Unacceptable (DNL above 75 dBA): The raise exposure at the site is so severe that the construction coast to male the indoor noise environment acceptable may be prohibitive and the outdoor environment would still be unocceptoble. Impacts and Mitigation Meas fres During construction of the Proposed Project, there would be moderate levels of noise from the operation of heavy equipment during grading and construction. In cases where construction noise is expected to exceed the State DOH "maximum permissible" property -line noise levels, builders must obtain ca permit per Title 11, Chapter 46, HAIL (Community Noise Control) prior to construction. The DOH reviews the proposed activity, location, equipment, project purpose, and timetable in order to decide upon conditions and mitigation measures, such as restricUon of equipment type, maintenance requirements, restricted hours, and Royal Vfstcs Howing Project Environmentol Assessment 36 portable noise barriers. Dona Three and/or its construction contractor will consult with DOH to determine if a permit will be required and what, it any, noise reduction measures are necessary. During operation, moderate levels of noise which would be consistent with the level of noise from neighboring residential subdivisions is anticipated. Therefore, the Proposed Action is not expected to significantly impact any existing residential subdivisions within the vicinity of the Project Site. Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Project would not be constructed and the site would remain unchanged from current conditions, There would be no additional impacts to noise tram this alternative. Cumulaf+ve Impacts Since there are no impacts from the Proposed Project, there are no anticipated cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project in combination with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions from noise. 3.3.6 Alr Quality and Scenic Resources Environmental Setting Air quality In Hawal`i is generally goad, below criteria levels for most pollutants in most locations at [almost all traces. There are no State Department of Health (DOHA air monitoring stations in the immediate vicinity of the Project Site. The nearest site is the Kailuo-Kana monitoring site which is located on Walua Read approximately one mile north of the Project Site. Air pollution in West Hawai `i, when present, is mainly derived from volcanic emissions of sulfur dioxide, which convert into particulate sulfate and produce a volcanic haze (vogj that can affect North and South Kona. Vog concentrations are dependent on the amount of sulfur dioxide emitted from Kilauea Volcano, the distance downwind, and the wind direction and speed on a given dray. Minor levels of air pollution also come from urban uses including traffic and other nearby industrial activities. Neither the Project Site nor any surrounding areas are mentioned in the County of Hawaii General Plan as being notable for their natural beauty (County of Hca oP1 2005). The nearest site is the White Sands Beach which is located on the coast approximately 2.6 mikes northwest of the Project and is not visible frorn the Project Site. Impacts and Mitigation Measures Short term direct and indirect impacts on air quality could potentially occur due to Project construction, principally through fugitive dust from vehicle movement and sail excavation, and exhaust emissions from onsite construction equipment. Royal Vistas housing Project a:nvrronmentci Assessment 37 Adequate fugitive dust control can typically be cxccomplished by the establishment of a frequent watering program to keep bare dirt surfaces in construction areas from becoming significant sources of dust. Indust prone or dust sensitive areas, other control measures such as limiting the area that can be disturbed at any given time, applying chemical soil stabilizers, mulching and/or usinq vo; d screens may be necessary. Onsite mobile and stationary construction equipnent also would emit coir pollutants from engine exhausts, but no sensitive recepinrs are present. The contractor will be required to prepare a dust control plan during construction compliant with ,previsions of HAA, Chopter 11-60.1, "Air Pollution Control," and Section 11-60.1-33, "Fugitive Dust.,, Also, the Proposed Project includes proposed landscaping on the Proposed Project's parcel; therefore, impacts to scenic resources are not expected to occur. Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Project would not be constructed and the site would remain unchanged from current conditions. There would be no additional impacts to air quality or scenic resources from, this alternative.. 'urmutcrtrve lmpacts Since there are only minimal impacts from the Proposed Project, any potential cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project in combination with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions to air quality or scenic resources would be minor. 3.3.7 Hazardous Materials and Wastes Existing En ronment Based on the known land uses of the Project Site for agricultural and livestock grazing and since the Project Site has not been previously developed or used for industrial purposes, no hazardous materials or waste are expected to be present. Additionally, no hazardous or solid wastes were noted by the field inspections completed for the Project. State databases died not indicate any Underground Storage Tanks (USTs), Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUSTs), or records of incidents or releases on the Project' Site or in surrounding properties (httr)s://eho- clo_ud.dc h.ha a i.goyfiheer/.#!/viewer, accessed December 2019). fmpacts and Mitigation Measures Previous land use and informal review has shown that is unlikely that any potentially hazardous, toxic, or radfoactive waste would be found on the Project Royal Vistas housing Project Environmentc) Assessment 38 Site. Reasonable precautions would be undertaken in the context of the Project construction Best Management Practices to include provisions for the appropriate reporting to the Stale and readiness for response and remediation Should any such hazardous, toxic, or radioactive material be encountered during the construction phase of tate Ptoject. Construction equipment would use fossil fuels, and hydraulic power would be used in grading and construction. There is a passibility of leaks, spills, or accidents during construction and during occupation of the development by residents (from an accidental vehicle leak) . The construction contractors will be required to develop and maintain an emergency action plan for management and recovery of any release of petroleum or hazardous materials to the environment. Onsite stcrmwater treatment would minimize impacts from spills during when the Project Site is occupied by residents. No impacts to hazardous materials or wasfe are expected from the No Action Alternative. Cumulative Impacfs Since there are minimal potential impacts from the Proposed Project, there are no anticipated cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project in combination with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions to hazardous materials or wca51. 3.4 Socloeconcmics Population as measured in the 2010 U.S. Census (the most recent U.S. census) for Forth Kana, a Census County Division (CCD), was 18,642 (U.S. Census Bureau 2O1 Oa). Table 3 provides information on the socioeconomic characteristics of the State of Haw'ai'i, the County of Hawaii, and North Kona CCD, from the U.S.. Census Bureau. Table 3 Selected Socloeconomic Characteristics DesCri tion State at Hawaii County of Hawaii North Kona CCD Total Population •36 ,,301 :,:s Median a e ears 37.2 -- - - 40.9 41.4 ictal hovsinq units 519,508 82.224 18,642 Median Household Income1 $71,977 $5 3 $65,682* Individuals below E?overty lever 10.8% 13.7%* Face and Hispanic Cera inti White alc,ne 24,7% 33.7; 45.6 Black or Africon Arnerlcan 1.6°,7 0.6% 0.5% American Indian or Alaska Notive 0.3% O] 5% 0-55; Asian alone 38.6% 22.2% 15.3% Royal Vfstcs Flawing Project Erivircmnmentol Assessment 39 Description State of Hawaii Coup of Hawaii i North Kana CCD ......-._. -.. � ,awalian 5,9% 8.5 11.2% More Races 23.6% 29.5% 218% His onic or Latino of any race 8.9X 11.6% 1 1.3% Source; U.S. Census Bureau 201Oa, 201 Ob. and 2010c 25ource: U.S. Census Bureau 20116 *Estimates for CM have a high margin of error due to small population and sample size. The County of HCawai'i's population in the 2010 census was 185,079, can increase of 2.4 percent from 2000. The population of the North Dona District increased from 28,543 in 2000 to 37,875 in 2010, representing a 33 percent increase. In South Kohalca the population increased from 13,131 in 2000 to 17,627 in 2010 which is ca 34 percent increase. This rate of papulation growth is significantly higher than the rate of growth for the state which was only 12 percent over the some period and the County of Hawal'i which was 25 percent. The combined populafion of the two districts was 55.502 in 2010 which ar-ncunted to 30 percent of the island -wide populcatIon (U.S. Census Bureau 201 Oa, 2010b, 2010c). According to the latest Housing Planning Study, in recent years building has focused on units that are not available for Hawaii families (SMS 2019). "in spite of continuing moderate growth of subdivision activity and housing construction in the North Kana district, housing problems for the low and moderate income groups have been particularly acute." Residents, including families, compete with the visitor market for the rental of apartment and condominium units. The General Plan anticipated In 2005 that the in -migration to the district would continue as would the need for housing for residents. The Draft General Plan 2040 predicts that over the next 25 years the; population in Ha ol'i County will grow roughly 50 percent, and identifies that housing is a burden for more than 50 percent of households (County of Hawai`i 2019). Lastly, the high cast of housing is reflected In the number of households that are crowded (two or more persons/bedroom), doubled up, or both. In the North Hcawcai'i District, 17.3 percent of the 10,203 households are crowded, doubled up or bath while 14.6 percent of the 14,184 North Kana households were in the same category, As such, there are 3,836 households in North Hawcai'i and North Kona living in crowded conditions or are doubled up (QHCD 2419). This is a trend that has been increasing since 2003 (SMS 2019). As discussed in Section 3.10.2, the Proposed Project conforms with all land use designations. Royal Vistas Ficawing Project Eravironmentol Assessment 40 Impacts sand Mitigation Measures The Proposed Project would provide 4.50 mid -market Rental units and For Sale units. These units are much needed In the area of North Dana as identified in the 2005 General Plan and Draft 2040 General Plan (County of Howai'i 2005 2019). Occupants for the development would either come from cin -island residents (i.e., existing overcrowded or doubled --up households) or new residents to the island. The Proposed Project would address a portion of this demand. The Proposed Project would generate work for the local construction industry, which would stimulate local economic spending. The Proposed Project would provide infill mid -market housing in the urban area and allow resident households better access and the ability to safely manage commutes between home, work, and recreation. Mable households lead to stable communities, and promotes a functional economy. The Project would also increase demand for services frorn residents bath during construction (transportation and trade services) and during occupancy (infrastructure, school, utilities, government) (see Section 3.7). Revenues of local government can increase as a result of a housing development project, at first from building fees, taxes an construction workers' wages, and taxes on sale and transport of building materials and then in the long term from property taxes and mortgage and deed transfer taxes (Housing Assistance Council 2419). Under the No Action Alternative, the site would rernoin unchanged from current conditions and the mid -market housing development Project would not be constructed. Cumulative Impacts Since there are no impacts from the Proposed Project, there are no anticipated cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project in combination with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions tc socioeconomics. The Proposed Project sloes not require any changes to land use designations and would not cumulatively affect land use because it is consistent with community plans. 3.5 Cultural Practices and Sites The following text are excerpts quated from the Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA) prepared for the Project Site (Appendix 4). The Project Site is in 1­1�51ualoa 1 St Ahupua'o within the area of Kona ka�'dpua in ,bona 'dkou, I--folualoa literally means "long sled course," and Hdlualoo 1st is a tradhtional ohupuo'a stretching from the ocean to the foot cif Huolaloi in the uplands. Royal Vfstcs Fiowing Project Environmentol Assessment 41 Very little is recorded of H61ualoa Ahupua'a in traditional oral accounts, The Heart Burring Legend of Ka -Mika, published in the Hawaiian language newspaper Ka Hoku o Hawaii contains the only description of wlblualoc. The legend is set in the 13th century but also reflects more recent influences. According to the narrative, The lands of HC)Iualoa were named for the chief of that name, both H61ualoa and Pucapuc'a were high chiefs, who controlled the lands from mountain to sea, which bear their names... Kaluaokalani served as a priest of Holualoa at the ternple of Pdkiha. This heiou was near the contest field of H61ualoa... The lands of this region are named for various ali'i, all of whom were related. When the chief Holualoa took up the challenge against Kepakc1II,ula on behalf of the Kona chiefs, Holualoa called upon his gad Kdlaipdhoa to assist him in his battle... Holualoa was the First chief to call upon the god KUaipdh a, and chis was the beginning of 'this goad's use by the chiefs of Ha ri,i. Pre -Contact Fra Halualoar Kona, and much of the leeward side of Hawai'i Island, while well populated at the time of European Contact, were settled later than the windward side. This in part may be due to the fertile land, numerous streams, and abundant rainfall on the windward side. Many archaeologists believe that Hawaii Island was first settled around A.D. 1,000 by people sailing from the Marquesas. During early settlement of the leeward side permanent habitations were established in Kona concentrated along the shoreline and lowland slopes. Informal fields were cleared at higher elevations where rainfall was higher. Between AIS 1200 and 140-0, habitation and agriculture expanded across the slopes and coastal area of Hualalai. The initial construction of the Moana f=ield System (KFS) began approximately between Ali 1400 to 1604. The development of these extensive formal wailed fields coincides with a dramatic papulation increase and with the development of the stratified chiefdom structure which is reflected through large residential complexes and heicau, Thus, there was a need to expand the previously limited agricultural base. The royal centers and larger heiau were in place by AD 1600 to 1800 whish reflect the growth in power of the rulers and chiefs in the region. Royal centers are located at Kailua, Halualoa, Kahalu'u, Kea'ow,ekua, and 1­14ncaunau. The region of Hoiwsalo; —i d: av loped into a royal center in the late 1600s to early 1700s under the reigns of Keakamahano (reigned 1680-17001 and Keakealaniwahine (reigned 1700-1720). Many 'ali'i and konohiki residences and numerous religious sites are known to have existed in this region. The majority of the heiau and royal residences were constructed along or near the coast, most Royal Vistcs Housing Project Erhvrronmentol Assessment 42 notably at Kamoa Paint south cf the project area. The royal enter at Hblualoa was eclipsed in the second half of the 1700s by the royal center in the Kahalu'u and Keauhou region. The Korea Field System The Kona Field System extends north at least to Kau Ahupua`a and south to H5naunau, west from the coastline unci east to the forested slopes of Hucalalal. During has travels In 1823, William Ellis noted the extensive field system divided with "low stone wales, made of fragments of Invo", producing "boncanas, sweet potatoes, mountain taro, tape trees, melons and sugar cane" and ''flourishing luxuriantly in every direction." Many of the archaeological projects conducted within Krona deal with components of the Kana Field System. The kola zone of the Kona Field Systema is from sea level to 150 meters amsl. This zone is associated with habitations along the shoreline and cultivation of sweet potatoes (uala), paper mulberry (wauke), and gourds (ipuj. Clearing mounds, planting depressions, planting mounds, planting terraces, and modified outcrops are common agricultural features In the kula zone. Permanent habitation including royal and high chiefly centers as well as non-agricultural activities such as fishing, ceremonies and burial practices were usually concentrated along the shoreline zone portion of the kulca zone. The higher elevation zones are the kalu`ulu zone. `apa'a zone and the `amo'u zone. The current project area is in the kalu`ulu zone. This wetter region is above 150 meters eamsl where bread fruit, sweet potatoes (lpornoea batatas), ki (Cord line fruticosa) ww ouke (Broussonetic papyrifera), kcaro 4Colocasia esculenta), sugar cane (Sa'cchorum spJ, and other arboreal craps were grown. The `apa°a zone is above the kalu'uiu zone. Hawaiians cultivated melons, sweet potatoes, ti, bananas, taro, wrauke and sugar cane in fields with low stone walls. The highest zone, the'ama`u zone, was used to grow bananas and plantains in walled fields. The `apa`a zone and the `camca`u zone were also used to collect timber and catch birds therefore temporary habitations were constructed. Post -Contract Era During the post -contact era, the Kona Field System was explcaited and the planting of coffee, sugar, sisal, citrus, and cotton took over original Hawaiian crops until eventually the land was used for cattle pasture. The first cattle and sheep were brought to the island by Vancouver in 1793 and 1794. Horses, mules, oxen, goats, and donkeys were brought shortly rafter. Feral cattle, sheep, and goats overran agricultural fields by 1813 to 1815. By 1848, in the Iona District, a Great Wall (the Kuakini Wall) was constructed from lanihau to #Onouli to keep thea away frorn homes and agricultural ureas. Formal cattle ranching began in the Kona region in the mid -1800s. Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 43 The Kona landscape evolved rapidly with the turn of the century. The rapid growth of the sugar industry produced the Kona Sugar Company in 1899. A railroad was built in 1901 to help sustain this influx in produce. It was later used to haul lumber and freight along with the sugarcane. The rail line was seven miles long and extended from Hblualoo to Ko'owaloa. Cotton, tobacco, and sisal were grown In the drier lands below the railroad. The changing subsistence and trade regimes developed by incomings European and American settlers, as well cis other historical factors, caused a depopulation of the coastal areas of Kona. Ranches were established at middle and upper elevations, and farms were established in the uplands where rainfall was higher and the temperatures were cooler. Cattle ranching and clearing fcrsugarcane and coffee removed many of the endemic species of plants. The suite of vegetation that existed prior to the pre -Contact erca were replaced by koa haole (Leuccren a ieucccephala), kiawe (Frosopis paflida). and other newly introduced invasive plant species. Schools, churches, stares, and ether businesses were also established in the uplands. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, coastal Kana was no longer the densely populated sociopolitical center it once was, It became a small cluster of houses along the trail from Kailua Bair to Keauhou. Homesteads, ranches, and plantations developed in the uplands during this period as reflected in the pattern of Land Commission Awards (LCA) and Land Grants (LG) recorded during the Mdhele. The project area is just maka �we$t) of most of the land commission awards and is at the same elevation as portions of the land grants in the region. Based on historic documents, the project area and surrounding lands were likely being used for subsistence and commercial agriculture, as well as for cattle pasture from the mid to late 1800s. The project area might have been used later than surrounding Lands because of its steep slopes and very rocky soil, but bused on aerial photographs. the project area was bulldozed sometime around the 1950s through the 1970s in preparation for commercial agriculture. The Mdhele The Land Corr rnission awarded the majority of Holualoa 1st and 2nd Ahupua`a to Victorio Kamdrnalu Ka`ahumanur IV, Kuhinaa NO of Hawcal'i Island and Crown Princess of Hawal'i as Land Commission Award (LCA) Number 7713, `Apana 43. Several smaller LCA and LG properties were also recorded in the upland region of Hblualoa 1 st and 2nd Ahupua'a. Twenty four Land Cornmisslon awards were recorded in Halualoa 1st Ahupua'a, the ahupua'a where the project area is located. A portion of LCA #3660 to Jahn G. Munn makes up a thin strip cf land located through the center of the current project area. With the notable Royal Vfstcs Fiou5ing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 44 exception of LCA #3660 and a fever other large LCAs, the average award was 2.8 acres, most (n=16) were for less than 3.0 acres. Three Land Grants (LG # 1592. 1602, and 3630were also recorded in Hblucalcaa 1st and 2nd Ahupua'a. LG # 1592 was a 25.0 -acre parcel sold to Keaialio and LG #3630 was a 38.2 -acre parcel sold to W.H. Cromwell. Almost all of the awards and grants were used as subsistence and commercial form land, and some were used to pasture cattle. Cultural Resources and Practices Related to the Proposed Development Consultation for the Proposed Project Gathering input from community members with genealogical ties and lorgstcanding residency relationships to the Project Area is vital to the process of assessing potential cultural impacts to resources, practices, and beliefs. These individuals ascribe meaning and value to traditional resources and practices. The following text has been quoted from SCS's CIA for the Project (Appendix 4). In the corse of the present parcel, consultation was sought from Jordan Kea Galpito, SHPD Budal Sites Specialist; Kamakana Ferreira, 0HA Compliance Officer, Nicole Lui, cultural descendant, Sean Naleimaile, State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) Hawaii Island Archaeologist; Kekoa Nczara, Kona Howalian Civic Club President, Shone Nelson, C}HA West Hawaii Representative, and J. Curtis Tyler III, cultural descendant. Consultation was also conducted via telephone with Gregg Kashiwa who served as project property manager for parcels 016 and 0117 in the early 1980s. Public notices were placed in the December 2019 issue of the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) Ka Wai Ola Newspaper. Public notices were also published in the Honolulu Star -Advertiser, and the West Hawaii Today on November 17th, 24th and 21st. There were no responses to the public notices published in the OHA Ka Wai Ola, West Hawa'r'i Today or the Honolulu Star -Advertiser newspapers. J. Curtis Tyler III, Nicole Lui and Greg Kashiwca did provide inforrnot!Qn cconQerning lands of H61ucaloa lst Ahupua'a. There were no past or ongoing cultural practices identified with lands of the current project area. lrnpacts and Mitigation Measures The following text has been quoted frorn SCS's CIA for the Project (Appendix 4). Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Environmentol Assessment 45 An analysis of the potential effect of the proposed construction of residences on cultural resources, practices or beliefs, its potential to isolate cultural resources, practices or beliefs from their setting, and the potential of the project to Introduce elements which may alter the setting in which cultural practices take place is a requirement of the OEQC (No. 10, 1997x. used on historical research and responses from the above listed contacts, it is reasonable to conclude that, there would be no traditional cultural practices affected and there would be no direct adverse effect upon cultural practices or beliefs In the brooder project area region. Under the No Action Alternative, no impacts to cultural practices or sites would occur. Cumuiatrve Impacts Through ori -going consultation, no cultural practices have been identified in the Project Site. Any potential impacts to cultural sites from the Proposed Project would be mitigated, therefore, no cumulative impacts frorn the Proposed Project in combination with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions are anticipated to cultural {practices ar sites. 3.6 Historic and Archaeological Resources An archaeological inventory survey (AIS) was conducted in 1984 for the entire project except for a 5 -acre portion in TM (3) 7-6-021:0117 of the project site ( SH 1984). In a letter to the County of Hawaii Planning Department dated July 30, 2018, (Log. No. 2018.00878 Doc. No. 1807SNC 1), the SHPD requested a new pedestrian survey to identify all archaeological historic properties present in the Project Site and on update of the previous archaeological documentation to include site plans for each site with site boundaries and areas impacted by bulldozing, photographs of all sites and features, an assessment of their integrity, and site significance. Kona Three contracted with SCS to conduct an Inventory on 76.1 acres to update the original 1984 area and a second archaeological inventory was conducted on the 5 -acre portion that had been previously excluded. Based on an interview with a local resident, the five -acre section of the project area was excluded from the original AIS because the property owners were planning to dive the fire acres to a group to use as o school. The two most current AISs are included in Appendix 5, and the results are summarized below_ Existing Resources In the AIS for the 76.121 -acre portion of the project site, 18 archaeological sites were identified and recorded. Fifteen of the sites were previously documented in Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Envrmnmentcra ,Assessment 46 the 1984 AIS and three sites were previously unrecorded and included a small coffee shed enclosure (Site TS -1), several ranch malls (Site TS -2), and a possible petroglyph (Isolated Find -1j. The Graft AIS was submitted in March 2020. Six of the 18 sites recorded were determined to be pre -Contact era, three associated With habitation, one with agriculture, ca single petroglyph site, and one single feature site (Site 1001 2) contained two burials. The remaining 12 sites were determined to be historic era, with many of the sites associated with coffee agriculture and cattle ranching, as well as two historic era habitation situ. The fallowing text is from the AIS submitted in 2020 for the 76. k 21 -acre portion of the Project Site IAppendix 5j. All of the carchaeolcgical sites were assessed signifaccnt under criteHcn "d" as they are likely to yield information important to prehistory and/or history - The railroad berm Site 30592 is also significant under criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history and it embodies dislinctive characteristics of the type, period, and method of railroad bed construction, A petroglyph (Isolated Flnd-1) is also significant criterion "e" as it has important value to Hawaiian people and people of other ethnic backgrounds in the state. The railroad berm Site 30592 and the petroglyph were recommended for preservation with preservation measures to be outlined in an archaeological Preservotlon Plan. The petroglyph (Site TS -1) is recommended for preservation in a safe location on the project area. No further work was recommended at the remaining 16 sites. Site 10012, a pre -Contact site described in the 1984 Ala, included two burials. The burials were removed and reinterred off -project prior to 1984. The site was farther excavated to ensure that all i+,nri had been removed. The site wcs then back-filled and leveled by bulldozer. In the ,SIS for the 5.0 -acre portion of the project site, 22 newly identified archaeological sites were recorded. The RIS was accepted by SHPD (Log No. 2018.01 123, Doc. No. 1805SNO55 {,appendix 5j. The following text Is from the AIS prepared for the 5.0 -acre portion (Appendix 5). The sites are primarily agricultural terraces associated with pre -Contact era to Historic era agriculture. Several rock walls and enclosures are associated with Historic era agriculture and ranching. A pre-Contoct era to later post - Contact era lava tube burial and a portion of the old railro®d berme were also recorded. Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Eravrmnmentol Assessment 47 ,1%11 22 sites identified during the current AIS study were assessed significant under criterion "d" as they are likely to yield information impartant to history, The railroad berm is also significant under criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history and it embodies distinctive characteristics of the type, period, and method of railroad bed construction. The burial is also significant criterion "e" as it has important value to Haaiicar) people and people of other ethnic backgrounds in the state. The burial is recommended for preservation in place with preservation treatments to be outlined in a Burial Site Component of a Preservation Plan (BSCPP), which has been completed and approved. The railroad herrn is recommended for preservation with preservation measures to be outlined in an archaeological preservation plan now under review by SHPD. Impacts and Mitigotlan The preservation of the railroad berm (Site 30592) and petroglyph (IF -1) with a Preservation Plan would prevent impacts to archaeological resources from the Project (Appendix 61. The Preservation Plan was drafted in February 2019 for the railroad germ, anti revised in March 2020 to include preservation of the petroglyph which was located in the subsequent AIS. The Preservation Plan outlines short-term and long-term preservation measures for the railroad berm, as well as archaeological monitoring during construction. During construction, a 20 -foot buffer from the western perimeter of the berm would be established with grange fencing. An archaeological monitor would be required for any construction work using earthrnoving equipment in close proximity to the buffer. No construction activities would take place between the railroad berm and the eastern property boundary except for the breaches allowed for access as outlined in the Preservation Plan. Any construction within 30 feet of the railroad bed and berm would be monitored by an archaeological monitor. A permanent preservation buffer would be established twenty feet from the western perimeter of Site 30592, excluding the approved breaches. Native ornamental plants may be used to mark the 20 -foot preservation buffer, excluding the breaches. No use of heavy earthmoving equipment would be allowed within the twenty foot buffer. Hand tools only would be permitted within the twenty -foot permonent preservation buffer, excluding the breaches. Kona Three is responsible for keeping the easement clear and open, and ensuring pedestrian access to the site. Parking is available on "lo Place. Access would be permitted seven days a week, one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset. Signage would also be placed at the railroad bed at the end of `lo Place. Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Environmentol Assessment 48 Under the No Action Alternative, no impacts to historic or arch©eologica resources would occur. Cumulative Impacts Fallowing implementation of on archaeological preservation plan, there are not expected to be any impacts to historic cr archaeological resources from the Project, therefore, no cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project in combination with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions are anticipated to historic or archaeological resources. .7 Infrastructure 3,7.1 Utilities and Public Services including Wastewater Treatment and Solid Waste Management Existing Focilitir=s and Services The Project would also increase dernand for services from residents during construction and occupancy including utilities, services, infrastructure, school, and government. Electrical power to the Project Site would be supplied by Hawaii Electric Light Company. A comment frorn Clyde Hemby pointed out that the name of the utilit ..provider we5.ingorregt [Appendix 1 b) . Telephone and data service are prgvi�e.d. fav Iggagutil't%es. Wastewater would be disposed of through a tie-in with the County sewer system. During Project operation, solid waste would be hauled off site by a private contractor on a regular basis to a solid waste management facility in comppliance with the opplicable provisions (HAI?, Chapter 11-58.), "Solid Waste Management Control"j. No burning of wastes would occur on site during construction or during operation of the Proposed Project. Fire. police, and emergency management services are available in this part of North Kana. A police station Is located in Kona, about five miles north of the Project Site. The Kallua Fire Station is located approximately 3.5 miles northeast of the Project Site. Emergency medical services are provided by the Hawaii County Fire Department, Emergency medical services are eavailable at Kona Community Hospital, approximately 7.5 miles to the south. Kcahcakai and Holualoa Elementary Schools are, the nearest public elementary schools to the Proposed Project, approximately 1.2 miles west and 1 mie east, respectively, of the Project Site. In a Final EA prepared for a new classroom building for Kealakehe Elementary School in 2018, the Department of Education (DOES projected the school could see a growth of approximately 33 students from 2015 to 2021 at the nearby Kealakehe Elementary School (DOE 2018). It is Royal Vistas lousing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 47 reasonable that the some level of growth could be assumed for K ahaukai and Holucloa Elementary Schools. With a current student population of 749 students at Kahakal (CSCE 2019a) and 519 students at Holualoa Elementory (DOME 2019b), this would be a three percent increase over a six-year period. Kecalakehe Intermediate School is the nearest intermediate school, located approximately 3.2 miles north of the Project Site. Konowneno High and Kecalokehe High School are the nearest public high schools, located approximately 7.9 miles south and 2.8 miles north, respectively, of the Project Site. Current student populations at the Intermediate school is 689 (DOE 2019c). There are currently 1,374 students at Keelakehe High School and 831 students at Koncwaena Hlgh School (DQE 20194 and 2019e). According to a letter received during early consultation, Konowcena Intermediate has capacity for additional students for the next five years, and the remaining schools are currently over capacity and expected to remain over capacity for the next fire years (Appendix 1), AddltIonally, Hcawai`i Cornmunity College - Pdlamanui campus and the University of Hawaii Center, West Hawal'i, are located approximately 10 miles north of the Project Site. The nearest private schools are Makuo Lan! Christian Academy approximately 9 miles north of the Project Site, and West Hawaii Explorations Academy Public Charter School is approximately 8 miles northwest of the Project Site. The Proposed Project is designed to serve the demand of the existing mid -market papulation of North Kona, which as described in the socioeconomics section consists of households that are currently overcrowded or doubled -up in market rate rentals. Impacts and Mitigation Measures Electricity and telephone/data service would be extended from existing lines. There could be minimal impacts from solid waste generated from construction. However, these would be hauled off-site. Since the development is approximately 450 units, the Project would result in moderate impacts to the county solid waste disposal system if occupancy is at 100 percent. Trash from all parts cf Hawaii Island are trucked north of Kana to the Pu'uanahulu landfill, which has anywhere from 20 to 100 years capacity (HPR 2020). The Project is expected to serve the existing demand for mid -market housing for on -island residents.. According to a comment letter received on the Draft EA frorn the Department of Education, the Project is expected to hawse approximately 99 HIDOE students. Roy,al l Vfsfcs Fiowing Project Eravrmnmentol Assessment 50 Although the Proposed Project is located within the West Hawaii School Impact Fee District, the DCBE has currently suspended fee collections, Kona Three would coordinate with DOE and comply with all applicable DQE requirements at the time of Project Implementation. Although this may result in a shift or oddition of approximately 99 students potentially from other on -island or North Kona DOF schools, the Proposed Project would provide much-needed housing for residents including families. The net of impact of the Project to the mid -market community in general is expected to be positive compared to the impacts to facilities. Multiple comments identified potential issues to local schools from the development lAppendix 1b]. Since the Wc 00. be ccrost(pctQ� in phases, c�c�upranc�r would occur over an _. exfended Period .of time and not all new studenfs. avou1Q be add d gt c nc� bul rather over a lander period of time. Under the No Action Alternative, the Proposed Project would not be constructed and the site would remain unchanged from current conditions and no utilities would be r}eeded and no solid waste from the Proposed Project would be generated. Cumulative Impacts Existing utilities and public services have and plan for the capacity to accommodate developments such as the Proposed Project, therefore, cumulative impacts from the Proposed Project In combination with past, present, or reasonably foreseeable future actions are expected to be minor. 3,7.2 Traffic Exi,5fing and Proposed facilities The concept of level -of -service (LCIS) is often used to describe the quality of traffic flaw. There are six levels -of -service, A through F, which relate to the driving conditIons from best to worst, respectively. In general, LOS A represents free-flow conditions with no congestion. Los F, on the other hand, represents severe congestlon with stop -and -go conditions. LCIS b is typically considered acceptable for peak hour conditions in urban areas. LCIS is usually applied to peak hour traffic, which is the "worst-case" scenario_ A traffic study for the Proposed Project conducted by SSFM International included analysis at eight existing intersections on Queen Kat"ahurranu Highway (Appendix 2). Five intersections were onaly-ed north of the Project Site: 1 j Palani Road, 2j Henry Street, 3) Hualalai Road (North), 4) Hualallai Road (South), and 5) Puapuaanui Street. Three additional intersections south of the Project Site were Royal Vistas housing Project Envrronmentc) Assessment 51 also analyzed: &} Kuakini Highway, 7) Lcko Street, 8) Kamehameho III Road (Figure 8). In the vicinity of the Project Site, Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway (Route 19) is undivided, two-lane, State-owned arterial, oriented in the north -south direction. Oueen Ka'ahumanu Highway extends from Kawaihoe Road (Route 19) in the north tc the intersection with PPalcani Road (Route 130) where it turns into State Route 11. The pasted speed limit varies from 45 to 55 miles per hour (mph). Approximately 2.4 miles north of the Project Site, Queen Ka'ahurnonu Highway opens to four to five lanes with dedicated left turning and right turning lanes at rnajoa intersections. Turning movement counts were recorded at each of the intersections at peak morning and afternoon traffic hours. The peak hours for the local roadway network were found to be between 7:00cm to 8:00arn and 8:45 to 4:45pm. Existing LOS were determined for the morning and evening (AM/PMpeak hours at each of the eight infersectians. The results erre included in the TIAR (Appendix 2). impacts and Mitigation The TZAR calculated the projected increase in background traffic volumes within the local roadway network (without the Proposed Project) in 2024 and 2029 (Appendix 2: Tables 12, 13, 19, and 20). Background traffic volumes are volumes not directly (associated with the development proposed. These volumes are comprised of regional volumes using (ween Ka'ahumanu Highway and the rest of the local rood cy network to travel past the Proposed Project. A background growth rate of one percent per year was assumed, to account for additional traffic at the intersections, This one-p-ercent takes into account the foll.owon ilil and Pualani Mokah development. The TIAR also assessed impacts from the Proposed Project following completion of 258 units in Phase 1 (2024) and then following completion of 192 units in Phase 11 (2029) (Appendix 2: Tables 14, 15, 21, and 22). Only one roadway is planned to provide access for Phase l of the Proposed Project. This roadway would intersect with ween Ka'ahumrnu Highway, approximately 600 feet north of the intersection with Kuakini Highway. In the TIAR this Proposed Project access road is referred to as "Royal Vistas Roadway." The TIAR € naly7ed impacts of the Proposed Project under the presumption that the Royal Vistas Roadway approach would have a left turn and a right turn lane. Turn lanes for this road would be provided for the southbound left turn and northbound right turn into the Proposed Project, Right turns would be channelized and this intersection was analyzed as a two-way strap -controlled intersection. A Royal Vfsfcs Howing Project a nvironmentol Assessment 52 crosswalk would be provided on the east side of the intersection for pedestrian connectivity to crass Royal Vistas Roadway. There would be a refuge lane for westbound left turns onto Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway to make this turn easier for drivers. The expected future lane configuration is shown in Figure 9 and, Q close -urs of the intersection is shown on Ficaure 10. The traffic analysis for Phase I of the Proposed Project indicates the only detectable changes to LOS under the With Project condition would occur at cine turn movern8nt. The Hualalai Westbound Right turn at the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Hualolai Road (South) intersection is predicted to decrease from LOS E to F in rnorning traffic. Under the Without Project condition, the analysis for 2021 projects a decrease in LOS at bath { 1 j Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Puapuacinui Street intersection (from LOS A to B in the morning and evening) and (2) Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Lako Street intersection (from LOS C to D in the morning) . No other turning movement at any other intersection or turn movement within the roadway network is projected (in 2024) to demonstrate: a detectable delay increase (Appendix 2). The traffic analysis for Phase Il of the Project indicates the detectable changes to LOS under the With Prow ect condition include; j 1) afternoon decrease from LOS C to D in the Hualcalai wesfbound right turn movement at Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Hucalcalal Road (South) intersection, (2) morning decrease from LOS Q to D in the Queen Ko'churronu northbound left turn movement at the Oueen Ko'ahurnanu Highway and Kuakini Highway intersection, and morning decrease from LOS B to C cat the Queen Ko'cihumcinu Highwoy/Kamehorneha III Road intersection. Linder the Without Project condition. the analysis for 2029 projects a decrease in LOS ❑t the following: (1) afternoon decrease from. LOS C to D at the Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Henry Street intersection; (2) morning decrease from LOS P to F at Hualalcai westbound right turn at the Queen Ko'ahumanu Highway and Hualalal road (South intersection; and (3) morning decrease from LOS C to D at Queen Ka`ahumonu Highway and Lako Street intersection {appendix 2j. The traffic cn alysis indicates that only one intersection and two turn movements would experience decreased LOS under the With Project condition, and many vehicle trip delay issues are unrelated to the Proposed Project (i.e., they would occur even if the Project did not proceed) (Appendix 2). Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Eravrmnmentol Assessment 53 Figure 8 Local Intersections Studied for the Project Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 54 Flyure 9 Proposed Improvements to Project Intersection with Queen Ka"ahumanu ` 1 ti Ull I ear.q.rw,i..,..-coat+ bn.n� �rS.C�'dJi` -Iv+1�'+1 Roycif Vistas Heus+ng Fr,o ert €nvkonmento� Assessment 55 I` !$N ,{y' W.'Y yQll .. - r Frw i3 ".. j !EW `R W[7E iiiACCELERATKN JVr IO' jr KZ t? KY i47YAc wffiT 44f9M_h w+i!£ wTe 7EC8EWAIK1 N -Arr= Row LFle Ktt"HJT MldAN .�� � � ... � — �.. � — � �'M,.�SF�'ll:.:/•T,.c+'i +3!!_.a'ii'w.,M1..u4�1 R:IM°�h.`14PTi. anT'°1°SFR A 17 iu r.Y� a=+yiiM14J 44M✓1J4Y 4 Rw Ir IMM i°a{ 7U4N LAW fav ix wpb t-g0.W LAM WW 6WQ w v Fy<g54;Lw i i ROYAL VISTAS-5 ROADWAY GRAPHICAL SCALE "ICE-MAY I.- EPSECT10K ac a rr ua f RPy'af Vistas Heus+rig Proter't €nvkonmento� Assessment 56 The Kona CDP includes the official Transportation Network Map — Nani Kcailua Area and shows future connections of 'minor collectors' running parallel to {ween Ka'ahumanu Highway in the locotion of the Proposed Project, extending Hoomama Street to L.eilani Street and Paulehia Street to Kek.uc:nc'oa Place (Figure 11). While the exact tiring of these improvements is unknown, it is not expected they would be completed prior to Phase 1 (l.e., in 2024). The most likely scenario is that the developers of Royal Vistas would construct €a collector rood to the south before the completion of Phase 11. The connection of these reads north to the Pualani Estates subdivision is not proposed for this Project, since these roads cross TMK (3) 7-6-013,004 which is owned by the Frank and Betty Gomes Trust tFigure 11. In addition, the traffic impact analysis shows nQ impacts to LCIS from the Project above, the background rate at the intersection of Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street which is the main entrance to Pualani Estates subdivision. Potential impacts to the Kona Vistas subdivision would be alleviated by constructing the Royal Vistas Roadway intersection with Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway. Also, the traffic impact analysis shows no impacts to LOS from the Project above the background rate to the tntersectican of Queen Ka'ahumonu Highway and Lako Street which is the main entrance to rhe neighboring liana Vistas subdivision. As shown on Figure 2 and explained under Roads in the Project description (Section 1.3), one existing County -owned road would: be extended (Kekuana'oo Street), the Leiloni Street extension would be constructed and stubbed -out on the south end of the Project Site at the Calvary Church property between the Project and Kana Vistas, and one neve road would be constructed (Royal vistas Roadway). All would be dedicated to the County as kart of the Propcsed Project. B-Q,sed. Qn a m .pts received on the Draft EA o otentli I 'm acts a traffi... r . the connector roads (Appendix 1 b1, Figure 3 shows the location and phasincs of theme �;QnQ"IQL Wgd.5,, While Figure 11 from the Kona CDP shows connecter roads connecting County -owned Leilani Street (in the Kona vistas project) to County -owned Ho'amama Street (in the Pualani Estates project) and Kekucana'oo Street (in the Kona Vistas project) to County -owned Paulehia Street (in the Pualani Estates project), these connections would not be built as part of the Proposed Project. Additionally, no rnauka-rrmakai connector foods from Hualalai Road to Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway are proposed as part of the Proposed Project. Therefore, the Proposed Project would have no effect to neighbors in adjacent subdivisions from Phase I, and only minimal impacts after Phrase 11. Royal Vfstcs Flaw ng Project Environmentol Assessment 57 Figure 11 CDP Transportation Network Map In the Vicinity of the Project Kana Community Develop �^ ."I ' °, - puma 4-2G O} icjal Traraponwwun Natwof* Map- Nero I ahm hrou Figure 1Q; CRP Trarrepvrtetilon Network Map in the Vicinity of the Project Tree Royal Vistcs Hoosing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 58 Additionally, any work that is conducted within the County Right -of -Way would conform to Chapter 22 - County Streets - of the Hawaii County Code. Under the No Action Alternative. the Proposed Project would not be constructed, and the site would rear ain unchanged from current conditions and LOS are predicted to decline in 2024 and 2029 cos shown in the Without Project fables in Appendix 2. Curmuicttve Jrmpocts The predicted impacts from past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future projects are estimated for 2024 and 2029 in Appendix 2. The predicted cumulative impacts of the Proposed Project in addition to past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future actions are estimated in the With Project projections in Appendix 2. As stated above, the tratfic analysis indicates the only detectable changes to LDS in the with Project condition in 2024 and 2029 would occur at one intersection and two turn movements, and other predicted delays are not predicted as a result of the Project. The cumulative traffic analysis completed for this Project was conducted before the Coyid-19 pandemic reduced traffic. Tbe traffic analysis included ca bcackarcund growth rate that taQk into. account nearby oroiecfs that are proposed in the vicinity of the Proposed Proiect iancludin — Penalozca School, Youth Gymnastic and Snorts Fitness Facility, and Pualuni Mokai development. Based on existing traffic vcli.,mes and future projections of traffic frorn Royal Vistas on the surrounding roadways iota [r]putfropi public. .mrraa�ntst, the following system -wide intersection improvements are recommended in the TIAR (Appendix 2) for ongoing consideration by Hawaii County and the Hawaii Department of Trcnsportation (HDOT): 1. Queen Ka'ahumcanu Highway and Palani Road: monitor and update signal timing to erasure left turn queues clear every cycle. 2. Queen Ka'ahumcanu Highway and Henry Street: monitor and update signal timing to erasure left turn queues clear every cycle. 3. Green Ko'chumanu Highway and Hualalal Road (North): depending on monitoring, a traffic signal array need to be installed but priority should be given to keep Queen Ka`ahumcanu Highway traffic moving. 4. Queen Ka"ahumanu Highway and Hualcalcai Road (South): monitor future traffic. 5. Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street: monitor and update signal timing to increase traffic clearing the Queen Ka`ahumanu intersection in one cycle. Royal Vfstcs Howing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 59 6. Queen Ko'ahumanu Highway and Kucklni Highway: monitor future t_raffii conduit a. traff1c_.�1.c1ngl.sdW . 7. Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Lako Street: consider changing the phasing from split to protected left turns to help lower the predicted delay, suggest further traffic study to analv�e signal Lodi n. This intersection would also improve significantly it Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway is widened to four lanes as in the 2035 Transportation Plan. 8. Queen Ka `ahumanu Highway and Kdmehameho III Road: monitor and update signal tinting as needed. 3.8 Irreversible and irretrievable Commitments of Resources A commitment of resources is irreversible when primary or secondary impacts limit the future options for a resource; an irretrievable commitment refers to the use or consumption of resources that are neither renewable nor recoverable for future use. All the land to be used by the Proposed Project is in a State Land Use Urban District and, therefore: has been characterized b "city -like" concentrations of people, structures and services. This District also includes vacant areas for future development. No new land would be irreversibly and irretrievably committed as a result of the Proposed Project. The Proposed Project would require the commitment of natural, physical, and human resources to plan, design, construct, and operate. Diesel fuel to power equipment would be used during Proposed Project construction and lbuilding materials, such as concrete and asphalt, would be consumed. Some of those materials could ultimately be recycled for reuse, those that are not would be expended. 3.9 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts No unavoidable adverse impacts from the Proposed Project are anticipated. 3.10 Unresolved issues 3.11 Required Permi=ts and Approvals The Proposed Project requires granting the following permits and approvals, which are listed by responsible agency: Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 6D • County of Hawaii. Department of Public Works, Building Division Approval and Building Permit • County of Hawai'l, Department of Public Warks, Engineering Division, Grading Permit • County of Hawai`l, Department of Public Works, Engineering Division. Drainage Plan • County of Hawai'i, Planning Department Plan Approval Mate Department of Health, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit • State Historic Preservation Division, Chapter 6e Historic Sites Clearance • State Department of Transportation - Highways Division, Permit to Perform Work in State ROW • County Council - Approval of Amendments to Zoning Ordinonce 3.12 Consistency with Government Plans and Policies 3.12.1 Hawaii State Land Use Law, Hawal'! State Plain, and State Housing Functional Plan The subject parcels are designated as Urban by the State Land Use Commission, and State Land Use Commission Docket No. A83-549 deierrnined the status of condition compliance for these land use entitlements. The Hawaii State Plan (Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 226, as amended) estobllshes a set of themes, goals, objectives orad policies that are meant to guide the State's long -run growth and development activities. The three themes that express the basic purpose of the Hawaii State Plan are individual and family self- sufficiency, social and economic mobility, and community or social well-being. The Proposed Project would provide much needed mid -market housing to residents of North Kana. The Proposed Project is consistent with the State Plan objectives and policies related to housing and facility systems as cited below: Ch. 226-4 Mate goals. In carder to ensure, for present and fvtvre generations, those elements of choice and mobility that ensure that individuals and groups may approach their desired levels of self-reliance and self-determination, it shall be the goal of the State to achieve: (1) A strong, viable economy, characterized by stobMt , diversify, and growth, that enables the fulfillment of the needs and expectations of Hawaii's present and future generations. Royal Vrstas Housing Project Enwronmentral Assessment 61 (2) A desired physical environment, characterized by beauty, cleanliness, quiet, stable natural systems, and uniqueness, that enhances the mental and physical welt -being of the people. (3) P'hysi'cal, social, and economic well-being, for individuals and families in Hawaii, that nourishes o sense of community responsibility, of caring, orad of participation in community life. The Proposed Project would meet this goal by providing choices far mid- market/workforce families in North Kona to rent or buy homes in communi lies near their work. Ch. 226-5 Objective and policies for population. (a) It shay be the objective in planning for the State's population to, guide population growth to be consistent with the achievement of physical, economic, and social objectives contained In this chapter. (b) To achieve the population objective, it shall be the policy 'of this State to. (I) Manage population growth statewide in a manner that provides increased opportunities for Hawaii's people to pursue their physical, social, and economic aspirations awhile recognizing the unique needs of each county. () Encourage an increose in economic activities and employment opportunities on the neighbor islands consistent with community needs and desires. (3) Promote increased opportunities for Hawaii's people to pursue their socio- economic aspirations throughout the islands. (4) Encourage research activities and public awareness programs to foster an understanding of Hawaii's limited capacity to accommodate population needs and to address concerns resulfing from an increase in Hawaii's population. (S) Encourage federal actions and coordination ornong moor governmentoi agencies to promote a more balanced distribution of immigrants among the states, provided that such actions do not prevent the reunion of immediate family members. (d) Pursue an increase in federal assistance for states with a greater propertion of foreign immigrants relative to their state's population. (7) Plan the development and availability of lariat and water resQurces in a coordinated manner so as to provide for the desired levels of growth in each geographic area, Boyar Vfstcs Housing Project Environmentol Assessment 62 By providing raid -market housing to these that need it, the Proposed Project would promote increased opportunities for local residents to pursue their socio- economic cspircthons, Ch. 226.13 Objectives and policies for the physical environment --land, air, and water quality. (a) Planning for the State's physical environment with regard to land, air, and water quality shall be directed towards achievement of the following objectives, (i) M afntenance and pursuit of improved quality in Hawaii's land, air, and water resources. (2) Greater public aworeness card appreciation of Hawaii's environmental resources. (b) To achieve the land, air, and water quality objectives, it shad be the policy of this Mate to: (i) Foster educational activities that promote a better understanding of Ha aU's Urnited environmental resources. (2) Promote the ,proper management of Hawaii's land and wafer resources. (3) Promote effective rnLos ores to achieve desired quality in Hawaii's surface, ground, and coastal waters. (4) Encourage actions to mointcain or improve aural and air quality levels to enhance the health and well-being of Hawaii's people. (5) Redur-e the threat to life and property from erosion, flooding, tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and other natural or rnan- ir;duced hazards and disasters. (6) Encourage design and construction practices that enhance the physical qualities of Hawaii's communities. (I) Encourage urban developments in close proximity to existing services and facilities. (8) Foster recognition of the importance and value of the lard, air, and water resources to Hawofi's people, their cultures and visitors. Tqe Proposed Project has been designed to minimize impacts to natural and vultural resources during construction and operation as described in the resource sections above. Royal Atcs Flowing Project Environmentol Assessment 63 Ch. 226-15 Objectives and policies for facility systems --solid and liquid wastes. (a) Planning for the State's facility systems with regard to solid and liquid wastes shall be directed towards the achievement of the following objectives: (1) Maintenonce at basic public health and sanitation standards relating to treatment and disposal of solid and liquid wastes. (2) Provision of adequate sewerage facilities for physical cind ec oQnomic activities that alleviate problems in housing, employment, mobility, and other crea5. (d) To achieve solid and liquid waste objectives, itshall be the policy of this State to. (1 ) Encourage the adequate development of sewerage facilities that complement picnned growth, (2) Promote reuse and recycling to reduce solid and liquid wastes and employ a conservation ethic, (3) Promote research to develop more efficient and economical treatment and disposal of solid and liquid wastes. As described in the water duality and water quantity section above, the Proposed Project has been designed to maintain basic public health and sanitation standards by tying with the County sewer service. As the final phase of the larger development, the Proposed Project complements planned growth as port of the authorized 1984 zoning ordinance. Ch. 226-16 Objective and policies for facility systems water. (o) Planning for the ,State's facility systems with regard to water shall be directed towards achievement of the objective of the provision of water to adequately accomrnc doh ,2 domestic, agric u It ura 1, cornrnerci& +ndusfrral, recreallonal, aria' other needs v.,' resource capacities. (b) To achieve the facility systerm water objective, it shall be the policy of this Mate to: (T) Coordinate development of land use octivities with existing and potential water supply. (2) Support research and developrnent of alternative methods to meet future water requirements well in advance of anticipated needs. (3) Reclaim and encourage the productive use of runoff water and wastewater discharges. Royal Vfstcs Flowing Project rrrivirxanmentol Assessment 64 (4) Assist in inoproving the quality, efficiency, service, and storage capabilities of water systems for domestic and agricultural use. (.5) Support water supply services to areas experiencing criticcai mater problems. (6) Promote water conservation programs and practices in government, private industry, and the general public to help ensure adequate water to meet long-term needs. As descriibed in the water quality and quantity section above, the Proposed Project would utilize the existing water supply through coordination with DWS and meet that objective. Through water efficient fixtures and xeriscape landscaping, it would meet the water conservation objective. Ch. 22b-19 Objectives and policies for socia -cultural advancement - housing. (a) Planning for the State's socia -cultural advancement with regard to housing shall be dfrec led toward the achievement of the following objectives. (1) Greater opportunities for Hawaii's people to secure reasonably priced, safe, sanitary, and livable homes, located in suitable environments that satisfactorily accommodate the needs and desires of families and individual, through collaboration and coopercalion between government and nonprofit and for-profit developers to ensure 1hcf more affordable housing is made crvcoiloble to extremely low-, very low-, lower-, moderote-, and above moderate -income segments of Hawaii's popWation. (2) The orderly develaprnen7 of residential areas sensitive to community needs and other land uses () The development and provision of affordorble rental housing by the State to meet the housing needs of Hawaii's people. (b) To achieve the housing objectives, itshail be the policy of this State to: (1) lmffectivefy accommodate the housing needs of Hawaii's people. (2) Stimulate and promote feasible approaches that increase housing choices for low income, moderate -income, and gap-groo.o houEebods. (3) increase homeownership and rental opportunities and choices in terms of quality, location, coast, densities, style, and size of housing. (4) Promote appropriate irmprovernent, rehabilitation, and maintenance of existing housing units and residential areas. (51 Promote design and location of housing deveiopments taking into account the physical setting, accessibility to public facilities and services, and ether concerns of existing communities and surrounding areas. Royal Vfstcrs Flowing Project ErIvironmentcrd Assessment 65 (6) Facilitate the use of ovo loble vocont, developable, crud underutiiized urban lands for housing. (7) Foster a variety of lifestyles traditional to Hawaii through the design and maintenance of neighborhoods that reffect the culture and values of the community. (8) Promote research and development of methods to reduce the cost of housing construction in Hawaii. The Proposed Project would meet this objective by providing the mid- morket/workforce population (a gap -group) housing options to buy or rent In North Kora. The Project Site is zoned for multi-famr ly residenfiai and is an in -fill project on vacant land that is surTounded by residential development and has utilities. available. Ch. 226-104 Population growth and land resources priority guidelines. (a) Priority guidelines to effect desired statewide growth and distribution: (I) Encourage planning and resource management to ensure thatpopuiation growth rates throughout the State are consistent with available and planned resource capacities and reflect the needs and desires of Hawaii's people. (2) Manage o growth nate for Hawaii's economy that will parallel feature empfoyment needs for Hawaii's people. (3) Ensure that adequate support services and facilities erre provided to accommodate the desired distribution of future growth throughout the State. (4) Encourage major state and federal investments and services to promote economic development and private investment to the neighbor islands, as appropriate. (5) Explore the possibility of makings available urban ;and, low-interest kions, and housing subsides to encourage the provision of housing to support selective economic and population growth on the neighbor islands. (6) Seek federal funds and other funding sQurces outside the State far research, program development, and training to provide future employment opportunities on the neighbor islands. (7) Support the development of high technoiacgy parks on the neighbor dslarnds. (b) Priority guidelines for regional growth distribution and land resource utilization: (l) Encourage urban growth primarily to existing urban areas where adequate public facifities erre already ovailobte or can be provided with reasonabie public expenditures, and away from areas where other important benefits are Royal Atcs Housing Project Eravironmentcrd Assessment 66 present, such as protection of important agriculturai Band or preservation of lifestyles. (2) Make availab;e marginal or nonessential agricultural lands for appropriate urban uses while maintaining agricultural lands of importance in the agricultural district. (3) restrict development when clrofting of water would result in exceeding the sustainable yield or in significantly dirninishing the recharge capacity of any groundwater area. (4) Encourage restriction of new urban development in areas where water is insufficient from any source for both agricultural and domestic use. (5) In order to preserve green belts, give priority to state capital-impr©vernent funds which encourage location of urban development within existing urban areas except where compelling public interest dictates development of a noncontiguous new urban care. (6) Seek pccrticipatlon from the private sector for the cast of building infrastructure and utilities, and maintaining open Spaces. (7) Pursue rehobilitation of appropriate urban areas. (S) Support the redevelopment of Kakac7ko Into ca viable resfdent�al, industrial, and cornrnercial community. (9) Direct future urban development away from critical environmental areas or impose mitigating measures so that negative impacts on the environment would be minimized. (lO) Identify criticai environmeritof areas in Hawaii to include but rant be limited to the following: watershed and recharge areas; wildlife habitats (cin land and in the ocean); areas with endangered species of plants and wildlife. natural streams and water bodies; scenic and recreational .shoreline resources; open space acid natural areas, historic and culturoi .sites; areas porticulorly sensitive to reduction in water and air quality; and scenic resources. (11) Identify c fi areas where priority should be given to preserving rural character and lifestyle. (12) Utili'z'e Hctwcaii's limited land resources wisely, providing adequate land to accommodate projected papulation and economic growth needs while ensuring the protection of the environment and the c7vailabiiity of the shoreline, conservation lands, and other limited resources for future generations. (13) Protect and enhance Hawaii's shoreline, open spaces, and scenic resources. Royal Vfstcs Howing Project Environmentol Assessment 67 The Proposed Project helps meet the demand for mid -market housing in North Kona, which is needed to support existing needs as well as predicted population growth in the area. It is located on vacant land in an urban area surrounded by residential development with utilities available. Ch. 226-108 (2) -- Sustcainabiiify. (l) Encouraging balanced economic, social, community, and environrnental priorities; (2) Encouraging planning that respects and promotes living within the natural resources and limits of the Stag; () Promoting a diversified and dynamic economy, (4) Encouroging respect for the host culture; (5) Promoting decisions based on rneeting the needs of the present Without compromising the needs of future generations; (6) Considering the principles of the ahupuaa systern; and () Emphasizing that everyone, inciuding individuals, families, communities, businesses, and government, has the responsibflity for achieving o sustainable Hawaii. The Project Site is within the Urban Expansion and Low Density Urban zoning district in the LIJPA, and is consistent with this designation. The Proposed Project would provide much needed housing options for the mid-market/workforce population in North Kano, and meets the sustainability objective by meeting the needs of the present without cornprornising the needs of future generations and promotes living within the natural resources and limits of the State. Chapter 205 Hawai"i Devised Statutes classifies all land in the State of Hawaii into one of four land use categories - Urban, Rural, Agricultural, or Conservation - and determines permissible uses in each district. The Project Site is in the State Land Use Urban District. The proposed use is consistent with intended uses for this land use district. 3.12.2 Coastal Ione Management (Program (Chapter 205A, Hawali Revised Statutes) HRS 205A defines the coastal zone as "all the lands of the State and the area extending seaward from the shoreline to the limit of the State's police power and management authority, including the United States territorial sea", the Project Site is located In the coastal zone management area. Royal Vistas housing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 68 The Project Site is located approximately 0.85 miles mauka of the shoreline at an elevations from 3.30 to 900 feet ams] and would not influence coastal process or conditions. The Proposed Project would also have no impact to coastal recreation opportunities, historic resources, scenic and open space resources, coastal ecosystems, economic uses, coastal hazards, managing development, public participation, beach protection, and marine resources (HAIR § 205A-2). Detailed explanations of potential impacts are described above in the environmental consequences sections. As the site and octbns on it are not likely to influence coastal processes or conditions within coastal areas, no potential impacts are anticipated. 3.12.3 Hawai'€ County Zoning, Special Management Area, and General Plan The subject parcels are zoned Multiple-Farnily Residential, with al minimum building site of 5,000 square feet per dwelling unit (RM -5), by the County of Hawaii. County of Hawaii Ordinance No. 02-131, which amended previous ordinances to establish zoning on the parcels. As described in Section 1.2, the Project is the final residential development identified in the zoning ordinance (No. 84-23) signed in 1984, and subject to subsequent amendments. An amendment is required in order to provide additional time to commence construction of the Project. This amendment request would be reviewed by the Planning Commission, with a decision by the County Council. Aside from the need for more time, this Project and the zoning that supports it continues to conform with the original findings and reasons for its approval by the County Council in 1984, and as amended as recently as in 2002. County of Hawaii Ordinance, 02-131 amended previous ordinances to establish the zoning on the properties cind rewired the applicant comply with conditions A through S, and the State Land Use Commission Docket No. A83-549, to determine the status of condition compliance for these land use entitlements. The General Plan for the County of Hawaii is a policy document expressing the broad goals and policies for the Iona -range development of the Islond of Hawai°i (County of Hawal `i 2005). The plan was adapted by ordinance in 1989 and revised in 2005 (Ho ai "i County Planning Department) . The General Plan itself is organized into thirteen functional elements. In general, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the goals, policies ❑nd objectives, standards, and principles for several functional areas. This section addresses the consistency of the proposed action with relevant policies of the County. Housing Goals: • Attain safe, sanitary, and livable housing for the residents of the County of • Hawaii. Royal Vrstus housing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 69 Attain a diversity of socio-economic housing mix throughout the different parts of the County. • Maintain a horsing supply that tallows a variety of choices • Improve and maintain the quality and affordability of the existing housing inventory Seek sufficient production of new affordable rental and fee -simple housing in the County in o variety of sizes to satisfactorily occommodate the needs and desires of families and individuals. Encourage and expond home ownership opportunities for residents. Housing Policies: • Encourage a volume of construction and rehabliltcation of housing sufficient to meet growth needs and correct existing deficiencies. Increase rental opportunities and choices in terms of quality, cost, amenity, style and size of housing, especially for low sand moderate income households. • Aid and encourage the development of a wide variety of housing to achieve a diversity of socia -economic housing mix. Discussion: The Proposed Project would incorporate measures to provide additional mid --market housing in a quickly growing part of the County. The location of the Proposed Project is adjacent to ether housing developments and services for future residents, cind would provide choices for the mid -market population In North Kona. Historic Sites Goals: + Protect and enhance the sites, buildings and objects of significant historical and cultural importance to Haoi'i. Approprfate access to significant histcrfc sites, buildings trod objects of public interest should be made available. Discussion: No impacts to archaeological sites would occur trom the Proposed Project. Natural Beauty Ovals: • Protect scenic vistas and view planes from becoming obstructed. Maximize opportunities for present and future generations to appreciate and enjoy natural and scenic beauty. Discussion: The Proposed Project would not degrade'the scenic environment of the area. Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 70 Transportation Goals: • Provide a transportation system whereby people and goods can move efficiently, safely, comfortably and economically. Discussion: The Proposed Project would include constructing on intersection from Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway that would allow for safe ingress and egress during Project construction and occupancy. In cddition, the Proposed Project would build and dedicate a substantial portion of the expanding County planned roodwoy grid systerrl. Land Use Goals: • Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the Cour y. 40 Protect and preserve forest, water, natural and scientific reserves and open areas. Land Use Standards • The desigr+ated land uses will be delineated on the General Plan Land Use Pattern Allacafion Guide Map. The broad -brush boundaries indicated are graphic expressions of the Genercll Plan policies, particularly these relating to land uses. They are long-range guides to general location and will be subject to: aj existing zoning, and b) State Land Use District. Similarly, the acreages allocated represent alternotives for the various levels of economic activity and supporting functions, such as resort, residential, commercial and industrial activities. Land required for community and governmental services and programs as well as new towns and resort centers may be accommodoled within the allocated acreages. Discussion., The Hawai'f County General Pfan Land Use f ahem Affocction Guide (LUFAG) and Facilities Map components of the General Plan are graphic representations of the Plan's goals, policies, and standards as well as of the physical relotionship between land uses. They also establish the basic urban and non -urban faun for areas and the planned public and cultural facifities, public utilities and safety features, and transportation corridors. The Project Site is within the Urban Expansion and Low Density Urban zoning district in the LUPAG. As discussed above in this section, the Project Site has been found to be consistent with this designation, The Proposed Project would provide much needed mid- market housing for residents in North Kona. Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 71 3.12.4 Kona Community Development Plan The Kana CDP encompasses the judicial districts of North and South Kona was develcped under the framework of the February 2005 County of Hawc l'i General Plan. The CDP is intended to translate broad General Plan Goals, Policies, and Standards into implementation octions os they apply to specific geographical regions around the County. The General Plan now requires that a CIDP shall be adopted by the County Council as an "ordinance," giving the CCP the ford; of law, This is in contrast to plans created over past years, adopted by "resolution" that seared only as guidelines or reference documents to decision -makers. The Kona CDP was adapted in September 2008 and amended by Ordinance 19-91 In 2019 by the County Council. The version referenced in this Envlronrnentol Assessment is eat: http://ww .ha caiicountycdp.info/north-and-south-kona-cdp/cdp-final-drafts. The Plan has many elements and wide-ranging implications, but there are several major strategies that embody the guiding principles related to the econcrny, energy, environmental quality, flooding and ether natural hazards, historic sites, natural beauty, natural resources and shoreline, housing, public facilities, public utilities, recreation, transportation, and land use. The Proposed Project's proposed development is consistent with all aspects of the Kona CIDP, including three of the eight guiding principles: (1 ) provide connectivity and transportation choices; (2) provide housing choices; and til Provide infrastructure and essential facilities concurrent with growth. It is in keeping with the Plan's the Goals, Objectives, Policies, and Actions to develop ca system of interconnected roads in Kon❑ (Section 4.1). In particular, Section 4.1.3. Objective TRAN-2 Street Network Connectivity. To develop a system of interconnected roads in Kona that will provide alternative transportation routes that will disperse automobile trips and reduce their length, while not compromising the through functions of arterials and major collectors with excessive intersections. Under this Oinfective, the Project complies with guiding principles established by the Kona Urban Area by promoting Policy TR'AN-2.1: Connectivity Standards (5j Future Extensions and (6Connectivity. It is in keeping with the Plan's the Gaal, Objectives, Policies, and Actions to guide the development of housing in Kona (Section 4.5). In particular, Section 4.5.3: Royal Vrstas housing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 72 Housing Caul: Diversity of housing choices for all segments of the population close to places of employment and/or daily needs. The Proposed Project specifically aligns with Objective HSG -4: Build More Units, Policy HSG -4.2: Workforce Housing and HSG -4.4: Housing Variety. The final guiding principle ernphcsizes that future growth should occur where infrastructure (roads and utilities) and essential facilities (i.e., police, fire, and schools) ate already in place. These facilities should be maintained at a level that will enhance the quality of life for Kona residents, This project is the final phase of a larger residential development that saw the completion of Kona vistas, a 215 -unit, single-family resider ial project on approximately 103 aures. The zoning that supports both the existing) Kona Vistas and prcposed Royal Vistas projects spans over 35 years. As last amended in 2002 to provide for additional time by which to complete both projects, the completion of Royal Vistas is encouraged by the Dona CDP as an infill rezoning. Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Environmentol Assessment 73 PART 4: DETERMINATION Based ars the tindinas below, and �rcn cor�sideratic�n of the public comments received during r)re-cansultcifion and on the Draft EA, the County of Howai'I am inc [ _ex artme.nt has de_termine:d that the pr-Qposad actiLz!n Y I r2-Qf. sionificcntly alter the environment cind has occordincily issued c Findina of No icinificlani Impact (FONSI) Royal Vistas housing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 74 PART 5: FINDINGS AND REASONS Chapter 11-200.1-13, HAR, outlines those factors agencies must consider when determining whether an Action has significant effects: 1. irrevocobly commit a natural, cultural, or historic resource. No valuable natural or cultural resources would be committed or lost as a result of the Proposed Project. No impacts to archaeological resources would occur with the planned preservation of the railroad berm and petroglyph. 2. Curtail the range of beneficial arses of flee enviranmenf. The proposed mid- market housing development does not curtail beneficial uses of the environment and is consistent with the mediurn density zoning in the LUPA and conforms to the guiding principles regarding urban growth patterns as defined by the Kona CDP. . Conflict with the State's environrnenta� policies or long-term environmental goals established by low. The State's Icing -term environrnental policies are set forth in Chapter 344, HRS. The broad goals of this policy are to conserve notural resources and enhance the quality of life. The impact from the Proposed Project is minor and, therefore, is consistent with all elements of the State's long -terra environmental policies and environmental gaols. 4. Have a substantial adverse effect on the economic, social welfare, or cultural practices of the community or State. The Proposed Project would not adversely affect the social welfare of the community and would contribute to services. The Proposed Project would generate work for the local construction industry, which would stimulate local economic spending. The Proposed Project would balance the social welfare of the community by providing infill mid -market housing and allow resident households better access and the ability to safely manage commutes between home, work, and recreation. Stable households lead to stable communities and associated workforce, and promotes a functional economy. 5. Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; stormwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design, b. involve adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. No adverse secondary effects are expected since the development would of lize existing infrastructure, provide infill housing, and is not expected to result in substantial demands to County services. 7. involve a substantial degradation of environmental quality. The impact trorn the Proposed Project is minor, and would thus not contribute to environmental degradation. B Ps and appropriate erosion control measures would be utilized during construction. Short-term impacts on air Royal Vrstus housing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 75 and noise quality will be mitigated by employing BMPs. No long-term adverse impacts are expected from the Proposed Project. 8. is individually limited but cumulatively has substantival adverse effect upon the environment or involves a comm tment for larger actions. The Proposed Project is not related to ether activitles in the region in such a way as to produce adverse cumulative effects or involve a commitment for larger actions. 9_ Have a substantial adverse effect on a rare, threatened, or endangered species, or its hobitot. There are no rare, threatened, or endangered species or suitable habitat ter tl-°-.5e species present at the Project Site, and no effects to these species are anticipated. Endangered Hawaiian hoary bats and formerly listed Hawaiian hawks, which are island wide-ranging species, would experience no adverse impacts die to mitigation in the form of timing of vegetation removal and/car hawk nest survey. Additionally, no rare, threatened, or endangered species of fauna are known to exist on or near the Project Site, and none would be directly affected by any project activities. 10. Have c substcntial adverse effect on air or water quality{ or ambient noise levels. No adverse effects on air quality or noise would occur. The increase In noise revels on the site are acceptable and would be only a moderate increase in the existing levels. To minimize impacts to air quality during construction, the Proposed Project would implement a watering program for dust abatement. Other control measures during construction such as limiting the area that can be disturbed at any given time, applying chemical sail stabilizers, mulching and/or using wind screens would also be utilized as necessary to minimize impacts to air quality. 11. Have ca substantival adverse effect on or is likely to suffer damage by being located in on environmentally sensitive orea such as a flood plain, tsunami zonae, sea level rise exposure area, beach, erosion -prone area, geologically hazardous land, estuary, fresh water, or coastal waters. Although the property is located in an area with volcanic and seismic risk, the entire Island of Hawaii shares this risk, and the Proposed Project is not imprudent to construct. The property is approximately 0.85 miles from the shoreline and the development is outside any flood plain. Based on potential impacts trom climate change, the Proposed Project has been designed to accommodate increased storm titer run-off from larger storms in the adjacent drainages and on site, 12. Have substantial adverse effect on scenic vistas and viewplanes, during day or Tright, identified in county or state pions or studies. No scenic vistas and vle planes Identified in the Hawaii County General Plan will be adversely affected by the Proposed Project. 13. Require substantial energy consumptiar) or emit substontlai greenhouse gases. The development would have solar water heating and incorporate Royal Atcs F ou5ing Project Envimnmentol Assessment 76 efficient appliances, os practical rind possible. Negligible emissions of greenhouse gases would occur during construction and occupation of the proposed development. Since the Project addresses on existing demand for housing, it is expected that a portion of t,• e residents that would occupy the development already Ilve in Kona or on Island, and there would not be a substantial increase in emissions when residents occupy the Project. Therefore, Project impacts would be considered c negligible Increase to the global annual greenhouse gos emissions. Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Erivironmentol Assessment 77 PART 6: REFERENCES County of Hcwai`i. 2005. County of Hawaii General Plan, as amended. February 2005. County of Hawaii. 2019. Draft General Plan 2040. August 2019. http:// vvvw.hir)lcnningdept.com/wp-content/uplood�/2019/08/201 -6-019- eneral-Plan-204O.Final .Draft .Qr)firnized.pdf. Accessed December 2019. Department of Education.. 2018, Final Environmental Assessment/Finding of No Significant Impact for Kealakehe Elementary School New Classroom Building, http://oegc2.doh.howali.gov/EA_EIS-Library/20}18-06-23-HA-FE..A- Kealakehe-Elernentary-Schoo l -New -Classroom -Build ng.pdt Department of Education. 2O19a. Kahcakai Elementary School: Strive HI School Performance Report. http:llwww.howcijipublicschc)oK.org/ReportsIStriveHIKohokcliEl 19adf. Accessed December 2019. Department of Education. 2019b. Holuaio© Elementary School: Strive HI School Performance Report. http://wvvw.ha ubliaschools.crg,/Retports StriveHlHolualooEII9.pdf. Accessed December 2019. Department of Education. 2O19c. Kealakehe Intermediate School: Strive HI School Performance Report. littr://wNw.lia oiipubl cschools.org/Reports/StriveHiKealake ir.)te,r1 .1 Accessed December 2019. Department of Education. 20119d. Kealakehe High School. Strive HI School Performance Report. hftp://vv w.howoiipublicschools.org/Reports jStdveHlKecllcikeheHi,ohl9.pdf Accessed December 2019. Department of Education. 2O19e. Konawaena High School: Strive HI School Performance Report. htt;2: /Iwww.hawaii-pu blicsc ho ols.org/ R eports/Stdvel-1 I KonaaenaHigh19.P df. Accessed December 2019. Environmental Protection ,Agency (EPAj. 2016. What Climate Change Means for Hawaii. August 2016. EPA 4301-F-16-013. Royal Vistas housing Project Enwronmentc) Assessment 78 https:// 19january2O l 7sncapshot.epo.00y/site5lt�roductioriJfiles/2016- 09/documents/climate-chance-hi.r)df. Giambelluca, T.W., Q. Chen, A.G. Frazier, J.P. Price, Y. -L. Chen, P. -S. Chu, J.K. Eischeid. and D.M. Delparte. 2013. Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 94, 313-316, doi: 10.1 175/BAMS-D-1 1-00228.1. http.11rc it1fa11 aec grrphy.hawrjil,__,W/inferoctivemai2.htrnI Accessed September 2019. Hawaii Public Radio (HPR). 2024. Hawaii Island Has Decades of Landfill Space But Still Faces Challenges In Dealing With Its Waste. January 9, 2020. httr)s: //www. hawcaiir)u blicradio.ora/vast/howaii-isic3nd-has-d ec ad es- landflll-sr)ace-still-faces-challenges-dealina-its-waste#stream/0. Accessed February 2020 Heliker, C. 1990. Volcanic and Seismic Hazards on the Island of Howai `i. Washington: U.S. GPO. Housing Assistance Ccuncil. 2019. The Effects of Housing Development on a Rural Community's Economy. http:i/www.rurclhome.orci/sct-inforr-notion/rnn hoc-research/mn-rral94-the-effects-of-housing-develor)ment-on-a-rural- cornrr unItys-economy. Accessed December 2019. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2047: Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, 11 and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pochauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds_)]. IPCC, Geneve, Switzerland, 104 pp. httQs://www.ipcc.chlslte/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4 svr full repart.pdf. Accessed November 2019, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2019. Web Soil Survey. https:// ebsoilsurvey.nres.osda.,gov/€ipp/. Accessed November 2419, Office of Housing and Community Development (OHCQ). 2019, Kaloko Affordable Housing Project Final Environmental Assessment. http;//oeac2.doh.howcaii.caov/EA EIS Library/2019-07-2-HA-FEA-Koloko- Affordable-Houslna.odf. Accessed November 2019. Pacific Islands Ocean Observing System (PaclOOS). 2017. Sea Level Rise: Hawaii Sea Level Rise 'viewer. hftjp5:llwww.pacioo5.hawaii.edu/shorellnel5ir hawcii. Accessed December 2019. Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Environmentol Assessment 79 Sato, H. H., w, Ikeda, R. Paeth, R. Smythe, and M. Takehiro, Jr. 1973. Soil Survey of Island of Hawaii, State of Hawai'i. U.S. Department of Agriculture -Sail Conservation Service and University of Hawaii Agriculture Experiment Station. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Scientific Consultant Services ISCS). 2016. Archaeological Sites Inspection Letter. 2016- Report for 20 Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites Located on 66.039 Acres of Land in H61ualoa 1st Ahupua'a, Kallua-Korea North Kona District, Hawaii Island [Portions of TMK: (3) 7-6-021:016 and 017]. Prep. for Richard Wheelock, East-West Realty. SMS Research & Marketing Services, Inc. (SMS). 2019. Hawaii Housing Planning Study, 2019. Prepare for the Howoi'i Housing Finance and Development Corporation. December 2019. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. Environmental Conservation nllne System (ECOS): USFWS Threatened & Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat Report. https.llecos.fws,gov/ecp/rc:?port/toblelcritical- habitat.html. Accessed November 2019. University of Ha al'i at Nlanoo Sea Grant College Program. 2014. Climate Charge Impacts in Howai `i - A summary of climate change and its impacts to Hawai'i's ecosystems and communities. UNIHI-SEAGRAtNT-TT-12-04. httr://secaront.soest.howaif-ed /wl2-contentluploods/2418!45/srrFINAL- Ha aiiClimateChange_odf. Accessed December 2019. U.S. Census Bureau. 2010a. Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics; 2010 Census Summary File 1 (DP -1) for the State of Hawaii. htti2s://www.census.gov/quickfacts/. Accessed November 2019. U.S. Census. Bureau. 2010b. Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 20110 Census Summary File 1 (DP -1) for Ha al'i County. httas://www.census.gov/quickfccts/. Accessed November 2019. U.S. Census Bureau. 2414c. Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2014 Census Summary File 1 (DP -1) for the North Kana CCD. https:/Iwww.census.aovlauickfccts/. accessed November 2019. U.S. Census Bureau. 2016. Selected Economic Characteristics: 2012-2416 American Community Surrey 5 -Year Estimates (DP03) for State of Hawaii, Hawaii County, and the North Kona CCD. htfps:l/factfinder.census,gov. Accessed November 2019. Royal Vfstcrs Housing Project Environmentol Assessment 80 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2019. USFIWS Threatened & Endangered Species Active Critical Habitat Report. https://ecos.fws.govlecplreportitoble/critical-habitat.html. Accessed November'2019. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2019a. About Earthquakes in Hawaii. https:.ilvolcanoes..usas gnvlcbservotorieslhvalcibout enrthgVckes.htrnl. Accessed November 2D 19. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2019b. Damaging Earthquakes - A Common Hazard in Hawaii. USES Volcano Hazards Program. Have ak Volcano Observatory. t s: volcanoes.,js s. ov obse votares hve hagardrt ua Accessed November 2019, Wolfe, F.W. and I Morris. '1996. Geologic Mop of the;siond ofHawai'i. USGS MISC. Investigations Series Mop 1-2524-A. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geological Survey, Royal Vfstcs Housing Project Eravironmentol Assessment 81 APPENDIX 1 a: Early Consultation Letters llarr+ Kim ".Iaycr Wil Okabe V,irugir* DOTCbh November 27, 2019 Oullty of �afltail DEPARTMENT OF PURLTC WORKS A►upuni Center lUl PaU&hk S1rL4'ii, Swire 7 hila, Hawai'i 46720-t'24 1808) 961-8321 Pax (SUS) %I -M34 pfklic unrk,,t rlhAwa4 acmty gov David YumaMoto, NE, Direciar r'4lbo G. Sirneva, P.E. Dept lye Tispeernr Michele Lefebvre, PhD PO Box 191 Hilo, HI 96721 (via email to: rniche?e.lefebvre stantec_com) Subject; Environmental Assessment Early Consultation for Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project, Island of Hawai i, North Kona District Tax Map Key: (3) 7-6-021.013 and 7-6-021:017 We have reviewed the request for early consultation for an Environmental Assessment and our comments are as follows: 1. Flood zones AE and AEF affect the subject parcels as designated by the Flood lrisorance late Map (FIRM). Now construction and substantial improvements Shall comply with Chapter 27 — Floodplain Management -- of the Hawaii County Code. 2. Drainage improvements, including the combination of the i"ialualoa Drainageway and the Horseshoe Bead Drainageway, shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval 3. All development generated runoff shall be disposed of on-site and shall not be directed toward adjacent properties - 4. All earthwork and grading shall conform to Chapter 10— Erosion and Sedimentation Control — of the Hawa.i County Code. 5. Akl work within the County Right -of -Way shall conform to Chapter 22 —County Streets — of the Hawaii County Code. Please provide tis with a copy of the EA when it is completed for our review. Shouid there be any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact Natalie Whitworth of ow Kona Engineer' ng Division off ;Ge at 323-4853. IV Ben Ishii, Division Chief Engineering Division NW Copy. Engineering Division - HILOIKONA, Planning Department - Hilo L"t.4sr� of iiaua< i i4 ars Pqual OYrlortu7irti Pliovidcr emd EWlayer Barry Klin May - County December 6, 2.019 Ms. Michele Lefebvre, PhD Er vironmerta Scient9st Stantec Ccr SLltirl© Senjices Inc. P.O. Box 191 Hilo, Hawaii 96721 Dear Ms. Lefebrvre: Faut K. Ferrelm KcnnElh 18ugrado, Jr. SU81ECT: ENWIRIONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EARLY CC NSULTAT]GN FOR PROPOSED ROYAL VISTAS HOUSING PROJECT, ISLAND OF HAWAVI, NORTH KONA DISTRICT, TMK : 7-6-021:016 AND 7-6.021:017 This is in response to your letter cated Naverrlber 18, 2019, requesting comments rElat`d to yvt,r projeet. Thank you far allowing the Hawaii Police Department the opportunity to participate. At this time, the Hawaii Dolce Department has no comments. Should you have any questions, please cantact. Captain Gilbert rt Gaspar Jr., Commander of the Kona District, at 326-4646, extension 299. Sincerely, PAUL K. FERREIPA POLICE CHIEF ROBERT WAG ASSISTANT LICE CHIEF AREA II OPE ATIONS GG/jaj 19HQ1210 of awal'i POLICE DFil la FV F VT 34911(+i'rlvi Succl • - 1:0.3wa fR19),] 5."11 .23119 Ms. Michele Lefebvre, PhD Er vironmerta Scient9st Stantec Ccr SLltirl© Senjices Inc. P.O. Box 191 Hilo, Hawaii 96721 Dear Ms. Lefebrvre: Faut K. Ferrelm KcnnElh 18ugrado, Jr. SU81ECT: ENWIRIONMENTAL ASSESSMENT EARLY CC NSULTAT]GN FOR PROPOSED ROYAL VISTAS HOUSING PROJECT, ISLAND OF HAWAVI, NORTH KONA DISTRICT, TMK : 7-6-021:016 AND 7-6.021:017 This is in response to your letter cated Naverrlber 18, 2019, requesting comments rElat`d to yvt,r projeet. Thank you far allowing the Hawaii Police Department the opportunity to participate. At this time, the Hawaii Dolce Department has no comments. Should you have any questions, please cantact. Captain Gilbert rt Gaspar Jr., Commander of the Kona District, at 326-4646, extension 299. Sincerely, PAUL K. FERREIPA POLICE CHIEF ROBERT WAG ASSISTANT LICE CHIEF AREA II OPE ATIONS GG/jaj 19HQ1210 04%00 Y. IGE Gq f_J%"p OFFICE OF FACLITIES AND Oft-RAMNS Decenlher IO.2014 S 141 [Ile A 111), 1311 1 l9 Hilo, HaNtraii STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATKGN P 0 BOX 2364 HONOLULU, HAWAI'l 956U Rc: 1.ItiaMIrltraent l r'iswwrIcnt F.irl% Comoiltatlon Rcgktom for Priryiu al Ru►al Visias I-�c�u,itl� P1°ca,rea:t: Flati�rair T14?I1'. '-[-U�I,I_tffa� lit +, tiutl]t KcII1:k }iawrtali Dew Ms. L.efiet+wre. UR GWDST14AM M,5HIMa51D 1110 Firs+rstt State Dep:u`tlnent ol" Education i 111174 ha- lI, ,, ltaixti ll'_' comments fiar flw propo-sed Royal W"it,1% Ia�1a�iI1 Pra�p�cl (Pra�jL�ct1 Acconlinv in dw i1llalrI i,oa + , i,Ic,I } lum ` HLE' I I C (IL-Vid0p t 0 multi-t4mi1% units. a cllmhtnation til-rentaland for wai ° ,Iti , c,Yr�,l in ' r;r3i1 }, naa. bland nt l lar °aii. Il;stw�;ii. TMK: 7-64)71:f}I6 & b1". ti4'}r4 n tFie 1srrYpeck iw n;artlr�:.YYYaI unit taarrlt .: 1,;0 I, a.l_ *v Ild v%pk 41 rwn-lil} 09 1111))1`, swile at, ILI rclid there, The IlI1 F schtnlb curruw1% wrI,icing the pr4Tased Project arca aare 1- olu111ara i:lcuienl:an. Kallakni Fleraeaat.ar}, Kc� alrslkelar 1icJdle. Ka+n:itia:aena I lirldlr. ICealal,e8�a: I fiplt :YrtiJ Kclnct�4armerr.a i li h, KortatwaeYls Middle ha.' Lnpacin :aaatl i4 *Lp :tc t t4ti lutti c:lptYeYlr +rL'r 1134+ neat f��t� wcyitr.. Tl a rr:m ainin ctirr4Yls rYre rurr4ntl4 o%vr r apaciry ind are a:apa:cteti Io reiniYin over Lara ICIt3 Mef tlae IW'd [I'Ve tiCM-.. Thi? prnrmc %ad Pro.$ect is laani d rsjihin the West } Impact F-ec Dtsirict. hvn %%ver %-.c are currcmtly not collecting impaez Crew T -he I [IDOL would like to rnctiive a cop) of the Dmvi Environmental Assessmemt for revic", Thank you fir the opp*rturlit% to comment. 'ahouicl w cru hive questions. pl asc contact (Robyn Loudermilk. School Lands and F-acilities Spectalis-, I-acilkies ❑evelopnatni Wanch_ Planning Section al (HUS 17X4- 09; or via cra}sail at mtr►°n,l4�tacierrnili:�`r+A E?.I;i.us. lte�I,ectful Iti. Kvimelh Co. 4lasdem 11 F' btic Worms Manager PI 111ning. SeVia7tl I UNI:rll c: Art Souza Complex Are a Snperinrendenl. Complex Area AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY t COUNTY OF HAWAPI 345 KEKUANT,,7 A STREET, SUITE 20 HILO HAWN 196) 7__;,) TELEPHONE (808) 981-8050 - FAX (908) 961 -46=,' Dec omber 16- 2419 Nis, ;M_Ichele Lefebvre ttt1`rtcc Consulting Services Inc. 1239 -lokts Place Hilo, Hl 96720 Dear lis. LefebYze: Subject: Pre-Tnvirunniental Assessment CGrisultatiun for Proposed Rovq] Vistas tiousina Project Island ❑1`Hay4aN,Norlh Kona District Tax Mali Key 7-6-021.1116 and 1)17 We have reviewed your Fro -Environmental Ass ssntent Constaltatioii letter. bated November 18. 209. Please be mromied 11mi tine slit ject parcels are served by art existiLis; scn ice tltaat cant n(,;uummodare a14 -inch meter or to Plac:L.', which is limited to t80,400 g llci7s Iyer d:t)- ter 47l trails I.)f ~%arer. Please note that the Uepaarmicnt ui` W;attr Supply a knowle+ egos that potable water is Ha;t'al'l Waad's most pi—"ioLrs r"ouict: and L rLIL, 'f f es( our t;ommunities to prornvc tf %� atter 4;onserv;atiun and reserve the hi-liest quaxlity t1f1:.Lt r for die. I :tIti1 v;iI wi hlw end-use, %which is the sr: :Lma.nce of life, We request 1:1-1t the develo:1 r w, IE - h rtirirr:iziit the dcfmmnd or propose to Stlppl', IIL.' I IC :;lnrtd'1'. 'I°, -I :.r•.. r It"'.I.Itl •. t i :4 L IJI IIL: ,I I x117;. tikAt1:s l T[Lo, ralI water demand Sha uId be IL:6k'144L1 .11 I' _ ...,ter I - L, , a'.IL_ 1 111,11 II;_ .I_';•_IL 1 UI Lk%L:II_ qtr;tt�.,ti,11 ILVZ1J lu bC ilrt]ucCd 0,1601 t+'AIld mdUCC Ilk: r11LII11:%;r 01 d''AC1h1" f 1:1;:l !I': 1-:"11t::tiUl Jtir.`d. •',,.ILIIiLL,iial wwer K:N-imcl thetotal rILImbero watertmiLs 711011 ItCd JO the subjCCI �houid there be any questions, please contact Mi r. Ryan Qu Lwiano of our 1Varcr Resources and Planning Branch at 96 l -3070, extensicn 251;, RQ:dmi S,rni:l.Nk �(]LIF, Keith K. Okamoto. P.E• %IarLwLeer-Chief Engineer rKE ,jter, Our Wo St Trredou-s siource. . . a i ai,4 Ki-Dw. Tame Depanrrmnt 4f water 5uparV rs art FALi2w OpporaunatyE orovidnr and rmnaf;lc..,ycr Msft nO Park S rrvlcs KMi0kC1-Hb WAVE MU 73 -4I -M Kara ?A Slrsai & U Uj% E rim►Mq! of UW Iriteelor Ne►tWW Kslarar�al NO Kfk-K7,i, Fia"N W740 �4 32951 F'sa IM 1,229 -?"577 F&Z Kaloko-HoC1C kftau IN RIEPLY REM TO: 1,7671 (2019,-14) December 18, 20319 Ur Michele Lefebvre Sizntcc Consulting Services Inc. P'.0. Lox l91 F11Q, 1-11 ,ai'l %721 au jc-Gl: National Park Service Comments fcw an early Consultation for an Ecvirc amental Assessment for >°he Proposed Royal Vistas Housing P'rojecl, Island of Hawai'i 3' orth llCona DitstricL, TN41 : "--6-1321:416 an 7-6-[321,017 Dew Dr. Lefebvre: Tbank you for providing the National Park Service liN?S j with the oppm1unity to corrus ent for an early Consultation for an Environmental Assessment for the Proposeai Royal Visw Housive Proj=L. The proposed projeci is I -leaded approximately 5 miles south of Kalokc-Hanok0hou National Higorical Park(Park) and 2.7 miles south of downiown K.ailua-YMa alb Queen Ka'ahumanu 1-lighway and W DUld wnsist of necessary improvements Ica cimstruct up to 450 residential araaits in multi -family confrgmtions with cla5lers of two- and th»e+e-stork build ing-�_ Congress established Ealako-Hartokfhari National Historical Park in 1978 to preserve, interpret. and IvTeettrotle tradilion al nati%je Haw<alija activities and culture by plrotecurtfr thG cultu al and, naturid reasoaiYces w "[thin lire fart: (16 U.S.C. § 396d(a)). I'lre Park con iains rirore Lhyri 450 ]sin}ti'r> archeological and Cultural smtcs, anzori«g Which UC sCveMt hCizu, rttmo; k-.% of ancien end historic trails, traditional dry -laid masonry tcififfes, more Cham 180 known anclriallnie "Is, rwo ancient Hawaiian f"Ishpainds with :`s -w iat, d wetlands, and a fishtraap. The park la,rW5 orad >. Dlers pmvide habitat for 17 fedural]y ]]sled spccics, and candidate species for listing, under the Endangered Spe,oitS ACL 'Aima6pi Fishpond and wedand is "core habitat" for the recovtry of two etldau&er # watcrbird ipecics,, the Hawaiian shit (f ima nropua m exicamu +4-ntrd vrA and the Hawaa11 an cow (Fidica americana alai), ani! is yin importan( habIInt for migmlury walerE`e wI.' In add iIion to (he fashporids and pools, the Pak boundary encompasses 596 acves u riaar1 rw waters and coral rc.7f lialntst_ As iva stated above, there arc many groundwatcr dep-ctid nt c,cosystcros (CDB) in t:ric [1a, -k- All of the Park's GDEs arc dcpcndcnt upon gmtw4w*tzr inputs to rraaintain these ecosystems, especially as habitat for culturally important and rare native aquatic species. I IS -4�zr -A Y► iidli a v'fCk. Loi 1. ,A=very t'lu f*r Rawa.IRan WatCihkdis, Smltd R"im EX?EP1ENCE YOUP AMERJGA rho Nai:crs21 P cairns V sPQJW pltaces sated tr/ IN Armdwn poop -s sD dart al wwy expedencv aur haftge 2 Appraatirnately'20,00 v1sitws per year visit the Park.' Local residents, cultural practitioners, and visittrrs from around the world came to experience Kalokt�-Honokftau's unique sense cif place, bio -cultural and natural history, aM to understand and perpetuate Hawaiian traditiorts. According to the Water Resource Protection Plan 2019 Updalt, the ctirwnt meftdology used by the State of H awai` i Corrnmissiun on Waier Resource Management (C%V?Jl+i) for delermimng sustainable yields &4* not explicitly a aunt: foo freshwaii�r flows nce&d to pre rvc GDEs such as anaiatline peels, fishponds, and wetlands_' CWRM has recognized the need to refine its rnanagamtnt approach to groundwater and requested that its staff study ways to refine the estimation of sustaimNe yields to &=unt for the needs of GIDEV nerefore, CWRM is developing a "pilot adaptive mainagemam plan" for protecting GDEs in parwership with the NPS z11d CUItural practhiQners.a TIC pilot adaptive n anagernew plan will focus on GDEs witEn Kalcko--l•lonok5haiu Nabonal I-listorical Pask. Tk Hawai`i CDunry Depamnent of Nater Supply has at -so pr sed measures to rainirnize tM effects of new grciundwater withdruwsls on groundwater dependent ecosystems and the. hladve Hawaiian tmdaboaal and custowary practices diet rely upon them. The 2017 Water Use a.r d Development Flan Update for the Ke'auhou Aquifer System Area describes these efforts and includes refined 4emand projections and a ealculatioin of Auffionzed Plan Use (or Anticipated Watcr Demand) for the aquifer syslcm 08,07 mil]+pan gallons per day). Therefore, the NPS requests that the Envirunrcomtal Assessment include the waler dernand for the proposed project and address wuhethef this demand was included in the Department of Water Supply's calculation of Authorized Pimed Use. Thauk you fore allowing us w comment on the early Consultation for m ai viroam nul Assessment for Ile PrWosed Royal Vistas Uowinj Project* If you live zny questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate, to contact Dr. Jeff Zimp fer of my staff (80-32 881 x 1500 oa jcff .zirnpfer@np3.gov). Sincerer. l�+r�K,r+ y � �ri •.Y Levsin Arguello Arg Superinicridwc "oko-Holrokftau Katmai Histcui+cal Parte Pu'uhon€ua u MnaunauNallianal Historical Park ' Ist;!!irmn.nps.�eeV,'Sr�t�f ' Carnmissmn On Water Itesuuree Mamaw,CM nnt, 2018 'Nater Resource Protection Plan 2419 Update, Appendix F. Pose 9, Public Rcviow Drak 00pbcr 2414- Av ailable at_ bttp:lldlnr.hawaii.raverwuWplaw6uglhiwoWlglan/wrpp: 'tbdr 11, ' tbid,, RXFWWKC! YOUR AMERMA The 142106n6l Park 3mvicn taros to 3p4scfal p hens mrowl by the Petr Mcsn pwple so "I al my expeWnco our twdlage. Stantec Cansu�ting Services Inc. Attenrion, Ms- Mir.-hele Lefebvre Fnvirnmmnrt;3l Sraanfi%l P-0 Pox I C11 Hilo, a 17")1 Dear Ms. Lefebvre: Qecember 19, 2019 kl�.•,k�cz ..r Via email; SUBJECT. Enw, ionn-ent;al Assessment Early Consultation for Proposed Royal Vis-ta5 Houbirzy Project lay' ated at North Kana Disttiu!4 World of Hawaii; TPwlKs- �;3 M 7-6-02 I -.0 16 fi 7-16-021,017 On behalf of Kona Three LLC Thank yDu'Gr ncO _rrJpUr:uPI[y to review and comment on Ehe subject matter TIle- LIInri Division of the C7epartment of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made: available a copy of your request perlainincg to the subject matter to t' LNR's Divisions foo [heir review and comments. At this time, erideseJ are caninier7 the a) Engineering Division, (b) DIVISi n of Fore, -1,Y & Wildlife, and (o) Laiid Divisi i�n - Ha,,vaii Dl&tric( on the subject matter. Should Vou have any questions, ple8se feel free tri �.nnlact Darlene Nakamura at (80 ) 587-0417 or email, darlenE-.F.r�� n�� rem, = •RR-1=� I gov ThAr.:k yt)Ii Sinccraly, uwsell Y. Tsuii Land AdirI'11i1iSlrator Enclosures cc: Ge ntral Fifes STEM WWJNC, MAIN ow jf �d IV �y►�lN•yr ? STATE OF HAWAII to DEPARTMENT T Of LAND AND N 4'1'URAL RESOURCES LAND UIVIMON P057r rlrITerE BOX G21 W�NOLULU,1.1.k AIS 9000 Stantec Cansu�ting Services Inc. Attenrion, Ms- Mir.-hele Lefebvre Fnvirnmmnrt;3l Sraanfi%l P-0 Pox I C11 Hilo, a 17")1 Dear Ms. Lefebvre: Qecember 19, 2019 kl�.•,k�cz ..r Via email; SUBJECT. Enw, ionn-ent;al Assessment Early Consultation for Proposed Royal Vis-ta5 Houbirzy Project lay' ated at North Kana Disttiu!4 World of Hawaii; TPwlKs- �;3 M 7-6-02 I -.0 16 fi 7-16-021,017 On behalf of Kona Three LLC Thank yDu'Gr ncO _rrJpUr:uPI[y to review and comment on Ehe subject matter TIle- LIInri Division of the C7epartment of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR) distributed or made: available a copy of your request perlainincg to the subject matter to t' LNR's Divisions foo [heir review and comments. At this time, erideseJ are caninier7 the a) Engineering Division, (b) DIVISi n of Fore, -1,Y & Wildlife, and (o) Laiid Divisi i�n - Ha,,vaii Dl&tric( on the subject matter. Should Vou have any questions, ple8se feel free tri �.nnlact Darlene Nakamura at (80 ) 587-0417 or email, darlenE-.F.r�� n�� rem, = •RR-1=� I gov ThAr.:k yt)Ii Sinccraly, uwsell Y. Tsuii Land AdirI'11i1iSlrator Enclosures cc: Ge ntral Fifes Qr3VD Y. 113E tia- lkw N U4 IMAH L ,-."SUBJECT.: LOCATION' APPLICANT: `il' TIR OF HAWAII DEPARTraUWV OF LAW AND NATITRA.L RESfIl1RCES LAND DMISiOrr MEMORANDUM DLNR AgancioiF:' Dlyi of AgL1,1t1rk 1:1' rrc00 -Divx of Boating Recreation X Engineering Division X Div of Forubtry & Wildlife )lv. of Slate Paris X CoRimissio!i on Water Resource Management ullice a[ conservation & Coastal Lands X Land ❑ivi5io n � Hawaii District Historic Preservation U1t?.NN11L p. r. Vit- cim m ?+ m ,SidL.NAWWAT Russell Y. Tsuji, Lard Administrator , Enviraci-n ntal Assessment Early Consultation for Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project North Kmnn District, island of Hawaii, TMKs: (3) 7-6-021:016 & 7-6-021:017 Stang Consulling Services, Inc on beh-,)If of Kona Three LLC Tre-ismitted for your review and cornrnent is irrforr'nnflor on the above-ref--Wnceld 3L oojcct maker. Please submit cornments by December 18, 2019. J ru response is received by this date we will assurne your .agency has no cornmerts. If your live any questions about this request, please =n1act Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417 or tly email at Thank you. Attachments cc: Cartral Files We i1c1v rets objections. ( j we have no comments, E Comments art attached Signed; '" _ Print Marne, Carty S. C"rig" Chief Engineer Date- i— DEPARTMENT OF LANA AND NATURAL RESOURCES ENGINEERING DIVISION LD/Russell Y. Tsuji Ref: Enviruninental Assessment Early Consultation for Pro,po d Royal Vistas Housing Protect Location- North Kona DistPiet, Island or Hawaii TM-K(s): (3) 7-6.021:016 & 7.6-02I:017 Applicant.- Stonier Consulting Services, Inc. on behalf of Kona Three LLC COMMENTS The rules and regulaJons of the Mgtional Flood Insurruicc Progyram (NFIP), Tide 44 of the C'�ldc- ol'Federal Re-Lilatil:uts ( CFR), are in eff ci when dovelrprne:nt fells within a Special Fli=(A Hazard Area I high ride alrcits). Stag pro 'Icct. are required it) cvmp>Ily� with CI=F rti C1ih,ttir�rMS ar �tipulatcd in SectinTi 011.1 2. Be advi.wd thou ,9dCl711 reflcets the minbr., iii gandards ,is se= forlh by the NFIP. Local C0111ML11111Y flood ordinance, may stipid,ile higher standards that can lie more restrictive and Would take preccdcncr over the irun-lmuru NFIP standarx14. 'i'Itc owner (if the rrr Rrci prop ei-Iv and/or their representative is ry;pow,If11L '.F r.yc:crcl� the Flood Hazard Zone desiziiallon for dic pru'uct. Flood 1-)a.-rarc: lrrrlc4 ,set: di "CLfriLi10C an FEIMA's Flood Insurance~ Rate Maps (PItLMi. which can he vlcixe_i n,i oiir Rood Hazard Assessment Tool (MIA I'i (hi ip,Ygi;. h:lw.liintip orgJJ-1]AT 1 If there zu-t gUesLitaJis fega lllll the lex ll Hood urd-In inucs. p}14"asv con[uct the applicable Cminty NFIP cimrdmating agency helow: Cl o Oahu: City and County of Honolulu, Depaartnicnl of Planning and Permitting (13w) ,68-8(M. o Hawaj Island: County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works (808) 961-832T o h° Iaui/Mclokaill-gnai Coanly of Maui, Department of Planning (809) 270-7253. a iCacaai: C aunly of Kauai, ILparurient of Public: Works (808) 241-4896. Signed: CART)(S. (-HAING, CHIEF ENOTv'FER r �x WX\IMaL n_ C,+LINE ppvlp Y. 113=_ } ''_ v9 b i` y iJi.kllii' R4 6t7'rt - �nW t [1M I uW nn � 5}r dlAk[j QLNATURAL FxIA+CK CgW=9;L3tt0N W5TkV USqu#xal. A1AUAG?i 1P M7 k STATE, Or, H.AWAIF DEPARTMENT OF LAYD AMD NATURAL (WOURC-PS LAND DIV [SION POIST PF" ME. WX fit }#r]TV{}r.IA tf, I -I AWAIT 9000 November 26, 2019 LR;ll:� ;11M:7-1LIIIIMI Diu. Of AgUatic Resources Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreatior X Engineering Division Div. of Forestry Wildlife _Div. of State rte:, I .-, X Commission UI I ','liter Resource Management C}f ue of Cutisur vation & Cuastal Lands X Lanai Division — Hawui, District x Historic Preservallon ,FR6M: -IJb ; Russell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator SUBJECT: PrvironmwLil A.�sessn}ent Early Consultation for Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project LOCATION: North Kona Diskrict, Island of Harwail; TMKs: (3) 7-6-021:016 & 7-6-C�21-.017 APPLICANT: Stantec Consulting Services. Inc. ort behalf of Kona Three LLC Trarrsmitterl' for ynllr ravk-v,, and comment is information an the above -referenced subject matter Please sLihmit mrnments by necarnher 18, 2019. It rio response is received by this data, we +will assume your agency has nc comments. If you have any quastiors about this request, phase carltact Darlene -Nakamura at 587-0417 or by c -nail at LiarIc:in s.k.riakamura hawaii.gov. Thank you. ( We hdvt� 110 bjection We have no , q en s Comments 1 Signed: Print dame: JDAVID C. S' , Adminitstratur Date."" Altachmeu is cc: Central Files GCVEANCA 0P WAU14 Sl A FE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES POST OFFICE BOX 624 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96W9 DEC 1 1 2019 MEMORANDUM: TO: Russell Tsuji, Adrninisvulur Land DIVIs1011 FROM: David G. Strtitlr, l\d,rtillistl:L .j, 6UZANNF. Q.CArc dG7,4n'i#� tA.W� ANri hlh'r. ,, ".:;iAl-i7� C$N4ilftmSN Ji4NWi`f'q at .. . R09@WT h h l,'A ,:; FNZSz C_ ' .. k4F 1A16}J«@YW F497CReVw Cll�4 I • HF h4 :lF CCrh5f�1'R'rl�. €5 cam. .�. �. ,.•.�,, ;, �, �,� 5 I• KA,kP • ,� Alf AAI .. Log ric ' : '; Stl)1IJ CT: Divi swit ,� I ° I - �.T, .,., 1_1 '.`, - .:I I . Carum lents on Royal Vistas Housing Project TNIK No.: (31 7-6-02:016 & 7-6_112I:011 of L.ariti and NWLIL-al Resow-:.,.,fl-NH) t.riw.:.11,,•. ;," i'orestryF and Wildlife: I'tce;i1' y��ur 'r: c�uil' 1°�udi�1 I �,µ lil., ,•I.. I We appreciate the ,3 iy In Provido consultation Civil lir t. h4°�;: :....., .�.:r:; llw�s �°. , i r-�,t rjved for this I7t•�3ject, under tone but a Lew ol'the rnultipj1 .: L I:�tits o trees 8t3�I �ss�i i lir-;�struca urc, Clean Air: In addition to creating oxygen, essseritial for all li;c on Em -h, tries clean the air by remnving carbon dioxide and other air pallutants. Oric hundred lane trees car. reir ovi; 19 Tons of carbon dioxide and 372 pounds of other airpellutants anrnally. Healtl~; & Well-being- Trw- 11o_i lie ghborhuods are: saC,:r. r-Auce nrc:ll al Lwo" ph,,,�it.al Aress, and cncnt•trzgc people to sp('nd rF oTc time owdoors. incliiklinfr transportaunn (i -C., �vzd'� Trig kirid biking vs. e;iriving).'T.,.r°t lied, -J stwv(sev.wuni e sI«wei driving, 2nd promc-1 pedc-sIrir]nSiill�a,. Energy Cost Savings; •lTrecs provide shade anti cooling, real}y mdue.ing energy costs. 'f rek:, save more than $622,000 per year (based on 2013 rates of $.32'kwh for 43,400 inventoried sti.cc trees in Honolulu.) Watershed Protection: Trees cost-effectively iilter and improve water quality by rudkwing stns niwater r�utroff mid flooding. `frees in l4onolulu intercept ntor+u than 35 million g,°tlJnr4s of stc�: sn,� rzt�r lace } r:ar. "fhis contribution is valtted at ruere3 than S350,t7 4 annually. Reef Prulcction: A healthy urban forest reduces erosion and filters pollutants significantly redLIV ng runcii and the deslrtle.ticsn cif our W1111able rre•ts, CILir comments as they pertain in tans. fires#s, and green infrAstructuare are below: 11"mposed free removal: 0 Scope of work should ilICI sdc vt tree proic t'lon platt and I,La ;til,orvl-sed Iryy rt certified arborist # Consider pruning as an alternative to removal Replac:c removed trees with native or non-invasive. canopy trees • Dcsignate v hich specks of'trees are proposed for removal Cl Proposed disturbance of area; Scope of work shoutd ind tide a tree protection plan and be supervised by a certified arborist a Install green infira.stmcture for rehabilitated areas past -disturbance [] Proposed tree root & crown pruning: Scope of work should include a tree protection plat) and be supervised by a certified arborist. p Proposed paving. Consider permeable pavement of other permeable surface to allow for absorption of groundwater Should you have any questions, phase contact Heather McMillen beather,l.n7cmillen(i bawaii..gov 9 or I VAVIV Y. IM 4k.. w h r q.. CAMI IGIt or ItwJnll j} Comm i. s I•. STATE ofWAM r4rre+w+' DY -PAR i•`11iIL4'NT OF 7_,M4D AM NATMIA r [tE+SL}iP1iMq LAND DIVISION POST OFFICE BOX 4521 140NOLULU, HAWAII 96849 November 26, 2019 Transmitted for your review and carnmerit is information on the above -referenced SLbject matter. Please submil mrnments by Docember 10, 201 D. if r u response Is received by this (date, we will assume your agency has no comments. _f you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417 or by email at dari@aeXnakamWM@hawaii,_g , Trani you, ( j_,ft have no Objections. ( We have no co mems. ( j Comments are attached_ Sig ned: _ _ .Print Name- { .ti)d JkLL ! Attachments cc: Central riles MEMORANDUM .J r-� M -� ; NO TO. DLNR Ageliclos, "c�'r �� �Divof aquatic Resources Div. of Boating & Frear Recreation 7C Engineering Division �C Div, of Forestry & Wildlife _Dv. of State Parks X.Commissfon. on Nater Resource Management _Office of Conservation & Costal Lands Land Division -- Hawaii Cistrict X Historic Preservation FROM: Russell Y. Tsuji. Land Administrator SUBJECT- FPviron rr.ertaI Assessment Farcy Cansultatlon for Proposed Royal Vistas Hmising project LOCATION: North Knna Distryct, Island of Hawail. "TrlKs: (3) 7-6-021 016 & 7-6-021,,17 APPLICANT,. Stantec Consulting SaNlces, Inc. ori i-ehalf of Karya Thrpp LLC Transmitted for your review and carnmerit is information on the above -referenced SLbject matter. Please submil mrnments by Docember 10, 201 D. if r u response Is received by this (date, we will assume your agency has no comments. _f you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at 587-0417 or by email at dari@aeXnakamWM@hawaii,_g , Trani you, ( j_,ft have no Objections. ( We have no co mems. ( j Comments are attached_ Sig ned: _ _ .Print Name- { .ti)d JkLL ! Attachments cc: Central riles DAM0Y,10E d'af3'm"P4+J•ift r}q' I-u+WS'fl, S`I'ATG OF HAWAII DETAWAIVII-Ar OF I -ANN PF%;TSMN p0170FFK'EEkbX 621 JJr?NO[ ULLf IfAWAIJ Q Stantea Consulting Services Inc. Altcntion: Ms Michele Lefebvre EFIvironrnental Scientist P-0 Box 191 Hila, Hawaii 96721 Dear Ms Lefebvre: December 23, 2019 91114M V CrAIV I10.,Lk95 D} LAfVi AN11Y N,kT r'ILAL IM14Gllsi'.L-S LCIIML�TrlOfi bl'[ y5'{-STr.H lL4TsUC�j�.�E mik%'A :yA]FNr via email: rry�cheE.#eikurs�t r- [ec.car�� SUBJECT. r=nvlronmontol Assessment Early Cvrisulto6an for Proposed Royal Vistas 1-tousing Project located at North Kona District, Island of Hawaii: TMKs: (3) 7-6-021:01G& 7-63-021,017 an behalf of Kana Three LLC Thank frau for the oPPOrW!11l'r (U FeVleW rul.I [�FHT)erlt rXI the SUbjeCt matter, In addition tip our previous c:4rT pients dated Decemtaer 19, 2019 enclosed are corrirrienis trorn the Commission on Water ResCurr.r- Management on [tie subject matter. Should your have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (BOB) 687-D417 or email: darienia.k_riekamura cLOhowa+r.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Russell Y. Tsuji Land Adminisirator Errcf osures CC' Cionlrsl Files Navem,Lijr 26, 2019 TAFMORANDLlhll O WWY. PCY TO: UU-.LHhtl_Ml Lu- i r -' - .., Dlv. of Boating & Ocean Recrealiorti l" rY Engineering Division . STATE ()F If -A4 All of Forestry & Wildlife 0 L@A.RT51 EENT O F r. A �� k z nN e r r u ,ti r. �� �'., e 11. r. E: r .1; _LCiv. Div- of State Parlks �{ I OX 621 Cornmission on Water Resource Manageinent 4ONC7i 1 1 irAWAJ1 96909 Navem,Lijr 26, 2019 APPLICANT- Stantec Consulting Services, lm . uiI U6Irai of Kana Thrc- t_LC Trai,smitted for your review and comment is information on the above -referenced ik : !!iarttar PlenSR ;iihmit carrrrpnts by December 18, 2019, I' ru response is received by this date, we gift assr-rmr: your ageticy has (lo c:or17n7enls. Ie y -,i.. Dive any questions abaci this refi+uesi, please contact Darlene Nakar wre at 587-0417 or by email at darlene.k.nakarnure&hawau,sacv. Thank you. Attachments rc; Central dies } Vk, have ro objectrons, ( ) We have r"o comments. x Carr mwts are attached. Signed: Is! M. Kale, Manuel Pant Name- Deputy Director Crate: Docomber 16, 200 TAFMORANDLlhll TO: Di -NR Agencies: ON. of Aquatic Res+aurces Dlv. of Boating & Ocean Recrealiorti Engineering Division of Forestry & Wildlife - _LCiv. Div- of State Parlks �{ Cornmission on Water Resource Manageinent ; Office of Consezvatiurt & Coastal Lands X I nd Division — Hawaii District X Fistoric Preservation 1-Fi&A Russeit Y, Tsuji, Land ,vrimis�i4t`�r �� r Envlrvnmertal AsscFsr -w-it Ln3il y Luiizultation for` Proposed Royal Vistas }Mousing Project LC)CATION: North Kara District, Island of F -I ivv,-M; i NIKs ;3) 7-6-D21.D16 8, 7-6-021:017 APPLICANT- Stantec Consulting Services, lm . uiI U6Irai of Kana Thrc- t_LC Trai,smitted for your review and comment is information on the above -referenced ik : !!iarttar PlenSR ;iihmit carrrrpnts by December 18, 2019, I' ru response is received by this date, we gift assr-rmr: your ageticy has (lo c:or17n7enls. Ie y -,i.. Dive any questions abaci this refi+uesi, please contact Darlene Nakar wre at 587-0417 or by email at darlene.k.nakarnure&hawau,sacv. Thank you. Attachments rc; Central dies } Vk, have ro objectrons, ( ) We have r"o comments. x Carr mwts are attached. Signed: Is! M. Kale, Manuel Pant Name- Deputy Director Crate: Docomber 16, 200 �i STATE F HAWAII w C1VU:r,Nu1_t CEPARTMENT 3F LAND ANS tuTUR$_, RESrAMCES COM 113$1 1N ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P_b. B01f.d71 Decemtrcr 16. 2016 REF: RM -5208.8 TO. Mr. RussalI TsuJi, AdminWratm Land Division FROF4, K laleo ManLjta . Q1e Putty GPreC10F CorrrmlSew on Water Resouma Managen�rn: SLI BJECT; Emirrinnmentat xi-isessment Early Ctlrtsult'atior, tar Prupcsed Royal Vistas Housing Prat Fir LE NO.: RFD. 52a8.8 TMK NO., {3Y 7-0-0211:0168 7 -C -4321:Q17 Thank you for the: oppoMmity to reviivw the su4 E&J-11' 't -11 3 carrnrrl"Oil err, 4V'I<t- ���ui•_e Managarrrc-nt (CVVRM) i_s the agency responsilhle far admirlistei 1 - State Water Cole V VJC?.all waters of the State are nebd intrust for the beef t cf (he chIzars c -f Slate therefor+-- all Yater U4�m i= _'-L err leg. I 1 protectea crater rignis_ CVVRM strongly promotes the ef#i zie nt use of vraim resrPir-F- rnr•_.. ccnsefvition measrares and appropriate resource management_ For mom wrb-rnation, p oas-e __`_' rC. tri VUa,ar r:da. ithpi.r 1740, Frwari Revised Sia u es, olid Hawah,aymurristratirwaa Rte. a•`c_"- Thr ;e Umerars ajv labte via the Int tie' al hfp lJdlrrr.t►a�eaii.Clor���rrm. iDUr rcr-r,erc= rf 2i3t45d to v13;=-Pesourves arta cnecKed oil nalaur. ❑ i VVe recommend cuordmabon with the aour4y to incorporate t`,, - : rrrF'tr , .t ; ;'5 ','Fater Use and Development Phan Please cantaGrtherespective Mannin�fs, —= is -.a Vizier Supply for turther nforrnaiion. 2. VVt recommend coordination with tt a Ertgirreebrtg Divisicq o' .ham State c rtraent of Land and Natural Resources tc Incorporate thrs pal act r, to the State VMer Projects^ Plan. B. We recomrneno CWfdPrtatan with the HawEd! Deponmenl of A,q-icufture (HOCA) tc irimrperste t*te reclassrrrcahen of agricuitural zvned t.arrd and " redtst;ibubon of agrPcuflural resewoes inla the 5.alea Agncufturaf Water Use and Deveraoment P;an (AMCF11- Please ccrtacl the HDW fpr more i nfomtation ® 4. We reonmmend that vMale• e"-tr ec .:,-,=ores t instatted mrW waaW effects nt p=U xs implerr ted t�Trougftout the deveopmen:.,j the increased daerrand on ft area's lreOwsadlef res -o -rtes Reducing the water .isage ort ;i i., i -3 -ar hu+lding may earn creditlowar'ds Leadamhip in Enexiy ant Enuironmen#al Cesign (LE=r� co �It�-�lrorr_ Aflore irr�n��n or t.Cf±DcerttFFcat4pn is a'�a�sbfr=_ al nttp;l v +1. usge5c.orgrleed A listing of FhAure-s cernf'ea by the EAP as "wing hrugn wmwefficmincy can tye found at hxtp.1fvvww.epa.ga-vfwalerwr,Se. rX-l—^1 5 We Fecommend the tiSe Of best rrranag4E!men% pracC (SMP, dor s -o rriwatermanagementto minimize the impact of the project to the extstir'rg aw's h+yclro"y +tie Amir -Pt nit and preventing polluted runoff from storm overit3. 5torrr4vate, rile iag- anent VMP-s rn-aY wrn cfev;owro LEER cartific,.ation. Mare 1nt0rma?ion vn stormwrater BMN- mai pe find at http rip la nn i ng.fawaii. gD%,/wz m i i ni-iaiiv W cw-kapad—developrrran V L_l 6. We recorrtnrend tho use of afternari�,a water sourc*s. whyrevi�f practfcawe. F] 7. VVe reezo mend parxrc gating in the Hawau Green Business Program, that assism arvi recognizes businesses that sirr,;e to operate in an er rprlmentally ml(l SCcially ,-.W rtjrble manner d-,5 uvgmm drascriptton can ba fou id on in-irat http;ttenergy ha++ratl_cJav gr n -business -t c ram. Q6. tate reoomrnend adopting �ancsrape irrigation consertiraton besl mara�rner'tprecaces enlumed log the Landscape lrrdustry Covnca of Ft ii. These praclxae's can be fouO crline at htt.p:lfwww.havraliscape.eaPrnlvrt�otutt�lJupkaads�Gl�r�.ili.I�H_lrri�8ti.,n_ Cere�serva9ion_f5f1'Ps.pdf. Mr. Russell Tsuji Page 2 December 17, 2019 9. There may be the potential for ground or surface water deg radatianlcontamination and recommend that OTHER.- Planning - The proposed water sources and prc�ectad waterdemands for the project, both nc aUe and non -potable, should be idem+fiad and the calculatfons used to estimate demands snou d be provided. A discussion of the potential impacts an water resources and other public trust uses of water should be included, and any proposed mitigation raeasures described. Water ronserva#ion and efficiency measures to be Implemented should also be discussed. If you navF~ any questiorxs, please contact Leriore Ohye of the Commission staff at 587-0216, approvals for this project be conditioned upon a review by the State Departmert ...r 4e!iltl-: and the developers acceptance of any resulting requirements related to water quality. 10 The proposed water supply source for the projeci is located in a designated water maria rernent area, and P- a Water Use Permit is required prior to us -2 cf water The Water Use Permit may by .:ord Lc: ied an the requirement to use dual fine water supply systams for now industrial and Commerckz ::j%� IDpnnents. ❑ 11 A Well Construction Permit(s) is (are) are required before the commencement of any well constructlor work. ❑ 12 A Pump Installation Permit(s) is (are) required before ground water is developed as a scurce c supply for :he-rgoect. ^•3 PierF s (are) well(s) located on or adjacent to anis project. lfwells are not planned to be used and will be ,Afx,:e d by any new construction. they must be oroperly 4andoned and sealed. A permit for well ua.-i; a -v v. -it must be obtained. r L)L;nd-,eater wiihdrawals from this project may affect streamflows, which may require an instrearn flow standard amendment, 15 A Stream Channel Alteration Parrnit(s) is (.are) required before any alteration can be made to the bed and/or banks of a steam channel, 16 A Stream diversion Works Permits) is (are) required before any stream diversion works it constructed or altered, 17 A Petition to ,amend the Interim Instream Flaw Standard is required for any new or expanded diversions) of surface water. 18 The planned source of water for this project has not been identified in tftiis report- Therefore, we cannot determine what permits o+' petiliotls are required from ouroffice, or whether there are potential impacts to water resoufces. OTHER.- Planning - The proposed water sources and prc�ectad waterdemands for the project, both nc aUe and non -potable, should be idem+fiad and the calculatfons used to estimate demands snou d be provided. A discussion of the potential impacts an water resources and other public trust uses of water should be included, and any proposed mitigation raeasures described. Water ronserva#ion and efficiency measures to be Implemented should also be discussed. If you navF~ any questiorxs, please contact Leriore Ohye of the Commission staff at 587-0216, Harry Kim 1.I.;V1 Wil Okatfe Mara t C praor WC9 Itawai`i Office 74- +rW Axte 11(cohokalcle Hixy KaRua-ltom Hawsa 'i s�a74(1 Phone ( 809) M4770 Fax (90R'v :327.3563 December 23.2019 County of I OR PLANNING DEPARTINIT 4T Michele Lefebvre, PhD Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Box 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Deur Ms_ Lefebvre: Michael Yee Mr?mr Uep>r�r- Dawanr i a [ Hawn 'I Office 101 Pauahi Strut Suite Hilo, Flaa%4196720 PJW31L: (909) 961.8288 Fwx (N 9) 951-°37 42 SLIBJ> CT. Comments for Earle Consultation fDr Environmental Assessment for Propused Royal 'Vistas Housing Project Tax jkl2p Keys: 31 7-6-021,016 & 017. E[Wualoa 11' & 2na N. Koa Howal`i This is in response to your letter dated November 18- 2019 recuesting early consultation comments for an environmental assessment being prepared fm- -: 4SO ii,ulti-fatnily residential unit development and related improvements on the above refercliced properly, ineludizig drlinaUe anti roa6� ay improvements within Ccunty-Dwned parcels IS and 19!_ Tic subject properties are zoned illlultiple-Family 1 .esidential, with a minitrturn building site of 5,000 square feet per dwelling unit (R,�1-�), by the County of Hawai'i. acid designated as Urban by the State Land List Commission. Refer to COU11ty of Hawaii Ordinance No. 02-131, which amended prcvious ordinances to establish the zoning on the properties, and State Land Use Commission Docket No, X183-549. to determine the status of condition compliance for these ]and use entitlements. 2, The General Platt Lnad Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) map designation for the properties are Urban Expansion and Low Density Urban, Jae aware ural. the Ccunty General Plan is undergoing, a comprehensive review and these hinds use: designations may 6arige soon upon adoption o an amended General Plan. ;. They property is not [ozated Avithin the Special Management Aze€t (SMA) and is sitLiatetid about 4.500 foci niauka of the shoreline. u 1 .r( RL—F_'.)_g0i'?y ,wpr, HwvX) C=nl y as wi Fquulf ppora3tr 4 v Pmvi&rtrd Fmplawr r° t' II„II._.” J.1 .kai:.. Ll 1).L. - ti• , Michele Lefebvre, PhD 5tantec Consulting S(�mices Inc. Page 2 Decernber23, 2019 4. The Property is in an area affected by the lti01111 COMM Utl Ity Dcveloprnenf P lan, which was adopted by the l lacy al -i Coumy Council hL. +~fir nancc No, 08-131 and amended in 2019 by ordirtut:ce No. 19-91, Please indicate- how the proposed project rmcets the goals, ubjec:ttk-es, pcalivies, and actions of the C'DP. 5. The E4 should describe the specific drainage and 1-(7ad%'av improvements proposed tivithin the County property and analysis of impacts and alteraiatives considered - 6. We str€ ri4fl ,• r, c*ornmend you review the Planalin Depirtmcnt files related to il'aese pt'opcir.cs l eemse they contain information related :,1 land use permitting history eultL�FL a:id historic reWrrrtes. flooding, traffic, and P-Ilb is .sezatiMC tt rcya:-IR2 the prc}rt1 td l,rujc�ct. The Files can be %-iewed in die Hilo or Kon, Occc, Plca:--c SCl,.CdU1C LGL SO 111U( lVe can ensure ull the files Ort for�ic��<'7� 7, Pleats; inr.We In the LA consultation process, sunno aiding pruperly oi%ners and. community as�o lawns. 1nC1Ud1t1g heat nOt 11111ltcd to, K -+.-ma \ _slns Subdivision. Pualalli Estates Subdl%•isLon. Kuakirti Makai Subdivision, and property owners directly east of the subject properties, We look forward to reviewln the draft EA whm it is available_ if you have any questiol,s, please ,eel rice to Cojltact MaiJa. Jackson at 961-8 159. IflCl"ll'. MICHAEL YEE Plattnini, Director N4JJ:mads P 711[4 Rov;1IVisris LLct.etre-#'r� �€�rarlrCnn u]�-F xtl'es4sx. � cc w/copy of letter. Ronald Kini, Depti Ly Corporation Counsel APPENDIX lb: Comments on Drag EA and Responses Mari, Ashle From: Jop! Ginipej {aiohafidfr@aol,ccPm> ,, Seat: Thursaay A i gust 13, 2020 8;06 AM To. Planr4ng Intrsrrwt Mai[ Subject: Kara Thfee. LLQ rig Prole- t Draft Erivironmental AS.ws5merlt Dear Director Lee As a ten-year resident of Rualani Estates ard Pres:dent of the Homeownem Association, I've reviewed the subject DEA for the Royal Vistas Housing Project and have a number Df concerns regarding the Traffic Impact Analysis. My concerns in lu°de the failure to take into account the polertial 0ect on traffic cart Kghway 11 that could result from the Suffo[R Investment and Ruaa Development applications for amendment to ordinances ncrw pending before the Leeward Plarining Commission. I presume you recall my comments on those :rpplicafians, which propose a 60,000 sq. ft. commercial development and 386 multi- far-rli y residential units on the west side of Highway 11, that I submitted to you on April 2 and June 3, 2-020. Those comments noted the already horrendous traffic jams experienced daily b(,'r.we!ei) Ki riry° street and Kamehameha III Rd. during peak Fours that woulcl be unalterably warscred by the additional traffic resulting from these applications. It is inexcusable for the Kora 'Chi(%� environmental assessment to fail to take the Suffolk ar,d Pune �ipplications into account. In addition, the Royal Vistas Traffic Impact Analy5ls, while appropriately appearing to forgo use of Ho'cmama and Paulehia Strer_ts In Pualar,l Fstares to gariri access for Royal Vistas residents and visitors to Wghway 11. l%i I)L" rpunanui Street, seeks to create a new, direct but norr- ;Ignallzed access to !-he !�ighway via Royal Vistas Rcl�,dway. Even assuming that access, lanes ran be provided on the highway, thu absence of traffic signals will inevitably lead to accidents and injuries. Furthermore, the existing access to the highway at the Lako Strut intor-:section is already woefully inadegUate because of the necessarily s'hort north and southbound access lanes. But I also nate th.:t. a.lk: dPPlieant could also seek tc have the County exercise enninent domain to allow the development to access Ho arnarTFa and Pualehia Streets in Pualani Estates through the tomes property, and thereby access Higr-,vay r I at Lhe Puapuaanui intersection. Our previous comments on these applications included oar strenuous objections to such Highway 11 access through Pualani Estates roadways. In sum, I firmly believe that adding 450 two and three-betfroom residential units with at least 900 vehicle trips per clay will aggravate the already unacceptable traffic delays on Highway 11 between Henry Street and Kamehameha [II Rd., even with the proposed added access via Royal 'vistas Roadway - I note also that the DEA fails to adequately deal with the existing problern of overcrowding in most of the public schools nerving the area. Even acknowledging that the development would venerate 99 students, there appears no provision for funding needed classroom space in the area. Finally, neither I, other owners of properties in Puaiani Estates, ,tor Hariaiian Managerrtent, our managing agent, received your original notice of this 700 -page SFA. After learning of its I 1,15200 existence from a third party, I reviewed it, notified our mariaging agent, and prepared these comments. Because many interested parties were not officially notified Of the DFA, 1 believe that the 30 -day deadline for comments should be extended. Aloha and mahalo in advance for your careful consideration of these concerns. Joel Gimpel 75-628 N. Mea Lanakila PI Kailua-Dana, HI 96740 308/325-4991 September 13, 2021 S,tantec ConsufFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tek t$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Joel Gimpel 75-628 N. Mea Lonakilca PI, Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Via email: alol�atidlr±ool.cc�n. RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawal'i Island Dear Mr_ Cimpel: Thank you for the comment letter dated August 13, 2124, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (IAEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The impact analysis fails to take into account the potertial traffic on Highway 11 from the Suffolk Investment and Puaa Developmentapplications for cimendments to ordinances being considered by the Leeward Planning Commission, given the existing- traffic issues between Henry Street and Kamehameha III Road. Response 1. Existing traffic conditions were established as part of the analysis in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (appendix 2 of the EA). As described in Section 3.7.2 and Appendix 2 of the EA, turning movement traffic counts were taken ct eight shady intersections, including Queen Ko'nhumonu Highway and Henry Street as well as Queen Ka`iohumanu and Kameharneha III Rodd. Although these intersections may experience delays, Appendix 2 demonstrates thatQueen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Henry Street functions at level -cif -service (LOS) C in the mousing and evening while Queen Ka'ahumcanu and Komehomeho III Road functions at LCIS B in the morning and level C in the everting. These are both considered acceptcble levels of service by the County of Hawcai'i. Based on the methodology described in Appendix 2, the TiAR assumes a growth nate of one percent to account for additional traffic at the study intersections. Projects such as the ones you mentioned, Suffolk Investment and Puaa Development, have been accounted for in this one percent growth rate. With these assumptions, the traffic impact analysis shows no impacts to level of service from the project above the background rate to these intersections. Sepaernber 13, 2421 Mr. Joel Gimp88 Page 2 cnf : Comment 2: The DEA does not consider accessing the proposed project from Queen Ko`ahumanu along Puapuaanui Street and then along Ho'omamca and Poulehio Streets in Pualani Estates. Kona Three could seek to have the County exercise eminent domain through the Gomes property. Accessing the project directly frau Queen Ka'ahumanu will lead to more accidents and injuries,. Response. 2: As described in Section 3.7.2, Konya Three LLC does not have rights to extend these streets across private land owned by the Fronk and Betty Gomes Trust, and Kora Three LLC as a good neighbor is not seeking to exercise eminent dorn ai,n when smother access option is available and supported by the Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT). Regarding the safety of accessing the site from the proposed intersection of Royal Vistas Blvd and Queen Ko'ohumonu, Kana Tree LLC has coordinated with HDOT and continues to coordinate with HDOT on ensuring the safest design and construction of this intersection, Ccmmo t 3: The existing access at the Lako Street intersection is currently inadequate due to the short north and southbound access. fl`esnanse A. Figure 2 has been revised to shrew that access to the project site would not be connected to Kekuana'ca Place from Lako Street until Phase 2. Although this intersection may experience delays, Appendix 2 demonstrates that Queen Kca'ahurmanu Highway and Lako Street functions at level of service C in the morning and evening which is considered acceptable level of service by the County of Howai'i. The traffic impact analysis shows no impacts to level of service from the project above the l6ackground rate to this intersection. Comment 4: The project would increase overcrowding in public schools with the adoiiio-i of 99 students and does, riot include provision to fund needed cicassroorn l{. Resggnse 4: As described in Section 3.7.1, the West Hawaii School Impact Fee District has suspended fee collections, Therefore, there is no funding requirement ii� for new developments. The project would be constructed in phases, an;; occupancy would occur over time. Additionally, it is expected that the project would provide workforce housing for the local community. The project's first phase would constricl rental units, and it is expected that occupants of these units would be local and many of the students already attend local public schools. Section 3.7.1 has been revised to clarify that since the project would be constructed in phases, all 99 students would not all arrive at once and occupancy would occur over a longer period of time. This is consistent with predicted rates of growth for the area which are considered by the Depertment of Education in their forecast planning for public schools. September 13, 2421 Mr. Joel Gimp88 Page 3 of 3 Comment S. bequest to extend the 30 -day deadline for comments. Response 5: This request was granted by the Hawai"i Cour7ty Planning Department and the DEA was released for a second K( day coferment period. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. It you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494--2039 or by email. Sincerely, Sfanfee Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre4stontec.com CC. Richard Wheelock, Dona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From: Lester Shirley <Iws1avwi-q:sbcgIoba1.net > Seth: Friday. August 14, 2020 11.06 AM �4 IC. : r f� To: Michele. lefeebwe stantec rcarn, Flarnnmg Internet Mad Subject: Royal Vistas HoLising Prc jert S s'sl3 1I,. I.efc'I.n-rc• 0I'd rhr Phnnirig DeMnrrinent 7 lit C I x kJ11AII rteer 111 111 K 111.L 1"I4l:15 wuIItII V ltil(tn \lr colicrm about this 'Pr111)90'rU 1 IlP atCCA 15 IrmI Iii- Kin—w �'H%i--. B a quite su}.s,. A -h1 it W111 rhC 4-�XtCpti(111 of I.Xko [sect. Tlic inner -"tion n# tilc hi?.h way and I.ako is ilreidy very 1-mmv. vrithow addinp, the :tdditawtil traffic tnim 4111 1111t1ii F111td-,' 111411:: '111v Ruval \-4," ta, I-Iou"Ing Pr,gc•ci nccd5 1013AX-c: ;+u C-Xit dircxtl' to the highw-.ty, m llddlligInr TO C11MV Incl exir rh-r ugh K itl,ti J.r-ter W, Shirley, I'SLI. RCill-CLI 1 1;15249 September 13, 2021 Stantec ConsutFing Servkes Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, H196721 Tek i808) 494.2039 Mr. Lester Shirley, Esq.. Retired Via email: kvslaw@sbcglabol.net RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawaii Island Dear Mr. Shirley: Thank you for the comment letter dated August 14, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The project would add traffic to the Lako Street intersections which is already a busy intersection. Response 1: Although this intersection may experience delays, Appendix 2 in the EA demonstrates that Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Lako Street functions at level - of -service (LOS) C in the morning and evening which is considered acceptable LOS by the County of Hawaii. The traffic impact analysis shows no impacts to LOS from the project above the background rate to this intersection. Comment 2. The project should have an exit directly to the highway, in addition to entry and exit through Kona Vistas_ Response 2: As descdbed in Section 3.7.2 of the EA, Kono Three LLC proposes to construct a new intersection Royal Vistas Blvd. at the project's intersection with Queen Ka'ahurnanu. Additionally, Figure 2 has been revised to show that access to the project site would be connected to Kekucana'aa Place from, Lako Street during Prase 2 of the project. At project completion, there would be two ways to access the project. We sincerely appreciate your review of the docurnent. If you have any additional comments or questions abo+it the EA, please contact me at (888) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. i Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre'� stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Moija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department August 16, 2O20 County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi; Street, Suite 3, H- lo,„ Hawaii 96720 RE— Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona [district TltiltKs (3) 7-&1021#O1fi, 017, 018, and 019 Clear Sirs: Ali 'I 1171. I arm a long-tirric horrcowner in Paulehia Street, having purchased my house in 7007. As a horneowripr, I am adamantly opposed to the propose Koval Vistas Housing Project, It would add aboui 450 multifamily residential units just south of Pualani Estates. The reasons I am against such a project are as follows 1. Much -increased baffle on the amain highway betvveen Henry and I.ako Streets, i specially wh Qr tourists and mainland people return tc five, work, and play on our island. 2. Possible traffic from Royal 'Vistas through Pualani Cstares, on Paulehld Street (nny street}, and Ho'cirnama Street. The streets here are narrow and many families with small children live Frere. Such traffic would then have to turn left On PIZIPuaanui SILW ry4 to get to the highway, creating traffic backups un Puapvaanui Street. 3. loss of property wralues in Pualani Estates due to the above possible scenarios. Please do not allow the loyal Vistas proposed project to go forwardl I 14e,)�- Ronald F. Raridon 75-6133 Paulehia Street, KLailua-Kana, Hl 96740 1 15408 September 13. 2021 ,Mr. Donald Ra6clon 75-6133 Pculehia Strut Kailuca-Kona, HI 96740 S,tantec ConsutFing Servkes Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FQNSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawai'i Island Dear Mr. Raridon. Thank you for the comment letter dated August 16, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment r DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The project would add to existing traffic problems between Henry Street and Lcako Street on Queen Kochurnanu Highway. Response 1: Existing traffic conditions were established as part of the analysis in the Traffic Impact Anclysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the EA). As described in Section 3.7.2 and in Appendix 2 of the EA, turtling movement iroffic counts were taking at eight study intersections, including Queen Ko'cahumanu Highway and Henry Street as well as Queer) Ka'ahumcanu and Lako Street. Although these Intersections may experience delays, Appendix 2 demonstrates that bath of these, intersections (Queen Ka`chumonu Highway and Henry Street, and Queen Ka'ahum anu and Lake Street) function at level -of -service C in the rnorning and evening. These are considered acceptable levels -of -service by the County of Hawoi'i. Based on the methodology described in Appendix 2, the TIAR accounted for traffic measured during peak periods of use in April and August 2019, prior to the Covid-19 pandemic reduction of local and visitor traffic. The TIAR also cssumed o growth rate of one percent from use in 2019 to account for additional traffic at the study intersections. With these conservative assumptions, the traffic impact analysis shows no impucts to level -of -service from the project above the background rate to these infersectians. Comment 2: Traffic from the project would impact Ho'omoma and Paulehia Streets in Pualani Esta es, and create backups on Puapuaanui Street. Res orlse 2: As descdbed in Section 3.7.2 of the EA, Kona Three LLC does not have rights to extend these streets across private land owned by the Frank and Betty Gomes Trust and Kona Three LLC is not proposing to access the project frorn these streets. Q� Sep ember 13, 2021 Mr. Ronald Rarldan Pane 2 of 2 Comment 3; Lass of property values in Pualani Estates. Response : The project is consistent with medium density zoning and conform to the guiding principles regarding urban growth patterns as defined by the Kona Community Development Plan (CDP). It is beyond the scope of the EA to speculate on property values In the analysis. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additionol comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre. Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@stantec;.com cc: Richard 'Wheelock. Kona Three LLC Marjo Jackson, County of Howo'l'i Planning Department Mari. A shle FFO: Kathy Wrnter <khkealani@gwad.cor :i - 54wt: Wednesday, August 26, 20 N 9.06 AM COR � �r To: Planning Interne[ Mail PUG 26 202C, Subject Royal Vistas Housing Project PA comments Attachments: Hui Response letter.clocx ,.eau u ul }Ula Heiau Hui To: Michnel Yee, Plitnning Director From! Heian Preser',:iti: i1 111Ii, Keaii Kuktii 'Uht lleiau Re: Royal Vistas Ise,%v1crpm rrl Pl.ri1 August 22, 2020 As the hui that is resp(,t)s1h1(- fq w the preservation and protection of the hei: u in the Pualani Est.ttes subtlivision, wt' %rish tO t71,11T •ys otir concerns with th,� prnposed devoInpi-nent' Royal Vist.is Hansing Project" [T'MK (3) 7-6-o2t:oib-olo]. 'File study of the arti t shows 1h it there 6 evitlerlt e 44 pre-coutLM a` griculUiral, ha bit: tial% bw i�il and tratrsporl ation feithir es, lova tubes and caves that were list Obscur_,d alrl,_-ody by the, bullcic►; ILA diffle in past. The sire of [he (level opment proposed will evase some of th'Lit histo v that et snot he restorcid or recreated. • That kind is rt Sigrlikcaltt IMI tLd 11W Ki111 I l'ic+lel gvstvili ( KFS) that foo and sttpporitA a [u111ukii ii>>t i I :i f.tit-k IlllYuspitabli' an:i, The laird 1)Ia•sposed for arceiuisition rci i titre wilIII r ()l tlie his Iorir2l VVidt'11L'L' WIIIAl Wit', 11Itit W1Ik-II II. i 'lil)Wl 111� developments were helilt. • Though Lk area rtra& and streets tict" d. there w -c rio pt-rctmibil strMins iii 1{on;i. The area kinder coi isid erati oil contailts one of thr. 11~w scab Aral wLttQi-sl ods thaL could Provide insight ill (n Olt; histol-ical rises of till lalirl ill rr-l.rt►r�rl lty ��iltt,r 4�srrlrc e�. Mos1 1)I.L."C'I•'.:II icIri erfurt5s inyK.vin�4yt�ptiryre+A the+shortlinc, so this pucel is especkill) �'alu�thlr� flrr 4rrtrtst1i1.11t 15111 that such a Iai,g r dt,vulrc[)ul�•1II thrt°aterls. Dr. Katt, Kcalani 1-1. Winter Co-chair Ric- 1,tl:eko 3i. nitin lag - Co-chair lreff NTohir .i Alv-%�inder - Res. & Doc. Manager September 13, 2021 5tantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Box 141 Hilo, HI 46721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Dr. Kate Kealani H. Winter, Co -Chair Mr. Ric Likeke Burnanglcag, Co -Chair Mr. Jeff Nohea Alexander, Resident and Doc. Manager Heiau Preservation Hui, Kean Kukui 'Ula Heiau Email: khkea1ani49rraii.com RE: Comments on Droft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, HawraN Island Dear Dr. Winter, Mr. Likeke, and Mr. Nohea: Thank you for the comment letter dated August 22, 2020, on fhe Draft Environmental Assessment (DFS,) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment t. The project area shows there is evidence of pre -contact cultural resources that not obscured already by ,previous bulldozing. The size of the project will erase some of that history that cannot be restored or recreated. The project is located on land that is a significant part of the Kona Field System and retains historical evidence that was lost when neighboring developments were built. Response 1: As described in Section 3.6 of the FA and included in Appendix S, two r,.rchaeologicol Inventory Surveys (AIS$) were prepared. The AlSs and EA cess .be the project's location within the Kona Field System and how sites dr-�n-ified during the inventories are relevant to the Kona Field System. As part of the AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evaluated for their significance. The AISs were conducted following Hawaii Administrative Mules § 13- 276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sites were considered significant under criterion d because of the information that was learned during tr,e study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs ensures that their information is not lost. The documentation done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. Two of the sites were identified for preservation (the railroad berm and petroglyphl . As described in Section 16 of the Fes,, Kona Three LLC is coordinating with State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) to ensure protection and preservation of these sites. Comment 2: Although there are no perennial strecarns in Kona, the project area contains one of the few seasonal watersheds that could provide insight into the historical uses of the land in relation to water sources. Response 2: As described in Suction 1.2 of the FA, the project includes c small portion of the Horseshoe Bend Ditch that would be re-routed but not destroyed. September 13,2C21 Heim Preservation Hui. Keau Kuko! Ua Heiau Ptge.2of2 Historic lana use is described in Sections 3.5 and 3.6 of the EA. Rhone of the existing Holualoca Ditch will be re-routed or destroyed; therefore, it anyone wanted to study the drainage ditches in the future, that opportunity would still exist. Mouko areas where rainfall occurs could be considered watershed areas and would not be impacted by the project. Comment 3. most preservation efforts in Mono are at the shoreline, so this parcel is especially valuable for preservation that such a large development threatens. Response__ _3: Regulations for evaluating site significance and eligibility for Preservation were applied to all sites in the project area. These criteria apply regardless of proximity to the shoreline. The project is following required regulations for development to protect cultural resources in coordination with the SHPID. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Pr1.D. mic.nele.le`ebyre stcn'e,:�.ccir: cc; Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawoi'i Planning Department Mori, Ash|@ From: Kat YWimer<mk■,bH»gm 1-com5 sL-nt- Wednesday. August 2 20 g#] A To: Planring Im@mk Mail (4 L Subject-, &off,Vistas HousirgPrjectEAcomm & Attdchm,L-nts Lt @ to Yee.docx 155§3 To: Michael Yee, Planning Director From! Dr. }date H.'4Veriler Re: Royal V'ss6as Housing Project ITIUIK (3) 7-"21, 016-0191 Date- August 23, 2020 As a teaching professional. I have deep concerns about the housing development referenced above. I have taught some of Kona's teachers as undergraduates and know the talents and challenges [bay work with. As a professor at University of HawBi'i Hilo and West Hawaii Community College. I have witnesued the deficits that the district schools leave our swdenis with. 5ocioeconnrnic stresses assor:iated with such a large housing developme---it 1 n this district will have adverse impacts on our schools, our teachers and our Studer R. The report states that,5 of cur 6 public schools are over capacity at this time. Where does the County plan to have the additional children from this 450 unit development go to school? Thank you for your consideration of this problem. Dr. Kate H. Winter, Professor Emeritus University at Albany September 13, 2021 S,tantec ConsutFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek l$QS) 494.2039 Dr. Kate H. Winter, Professor Emeritus Via email: khkealar,i;.-)gmail.corn RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Hauling Project, North Kanas District, Hawaii Island Dear Dr. Winter: shank you for the comment letter dated August 23, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please tind responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: As a professor, I have witnessed the deficits that the district schools leave our students with. The project will have adverse impacts to schools which are already over capacity. Response 1: As described in Section 1.2 of the EA, the project would be censfructed in pf uses and occupancy would occur over time. It is expected that the project would provide workforce housing for the local community. The project's first phase would construct rental units, and it is expected that occupants at these units wculd be local residents and many of the students already attend local public schools. Even if the project added 99 new students to the district, all 99 students would not all arrive at once since the units would be built in phcses and occupancy would occur over a longer period of time. This is consistent with predicted rates of growth for the area which are considered by the Hawaii State Deportment of Education in their forecast planning for public schools. We sincerely appreciate your review of the docurnent. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contract me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Sfantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph D. mich ele.lefebvre�a-stonter.corn cc; Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jockson, County of Hawal'i Planning Department Mori, Ashley From: neo jh�(JOhawaiixr.com 5 en t Tuesday. August 25, 2020 10.31 AM To: phoning Internet Mail Cc: 'dOmkcna@aoI.coFr Subject-- Royal Vitas Attaiihments., Royal Vistaspdf Picase nc attached Thank you - Daniel Milak-ic LTC DANIEL C, M,ALAKIE (R) 76-117 KAMEHAM,ALU STREET KAI'LU'A-KONA, HI 96740 25 AUG 20 Courty of Hawaii Planr!iN Commission. I am wrriitung in opposition to the proposed nowdeveloprnent , %yal Vistas. I have lived here fcr over 25 years and have been very active in our community_ I have seen tine lack of infrastructure causing numerous problems for our c❑rrmaanity. As you know it you live in Kcna, the biggest problem is tri llIL. Wien 11w1gs return to normal and the tourists rand vsitors return and when w are able to opc!-) al our 13L,s1nesse� and return to work, [tie tra iic oxtems Wimper to bumper frorn north cif the airpurt to Captoin Cock. The traffic light at Laky and ween K. intersection takes 3,5 minutes to change. Only a few ears are able to go through Ws light at one 1irne. There is the potential fan over 2000 Flew vehicles Irom the n.eww proposed devslopmert traveling throk nh 4 -1 -dr, Dight every clay, This Intersection is already one of the deadliest intersec tic ns ri r;,,,; , h .gvif�q rur iLL roes fatal ucc,dents. This alane could acid on an additional 30+ mini. -c s in nr,r. co-in!LJ,. VAP naevi a 4 -dame higriway (ream Henry Street tc Kam 3 Highway, There is terrible flooding in this area. Numerous (Imes when there was a heavy rain. I have per'sorrally witnessed a water' rl( 11 -int was 20 meters wide go over Queen K. Highway tatween Rualani Estat€ & and Lako StrF----1 II blocked tine entire highway It also caused Much destruction, There is st` &el f u, --di )g in this area and not much you case dor to slap it. A new development will compcun❑ anis problem_ Another m.I�[yr concern is for our water. It than aro 750 new apartments and condos guilt, what will happen to ouf water supply and additional sewage? There is alreacy o strain on the existing wells and wdtersrted. Additiorial schools gill slse be neadect. This area is rich in cultural places and act!+r:ties, There is a !ark at parks and recreational areas In our community. Just look a6 the arrount of peniple that tivalk theWailua *rail and the Old Airport tr2ii every day. You can check with PATH for additional informatron, It the C-Ounty bought this piece of property they could have a oetautif it park- hiking trails and show significant cultural landmarks. There are nurner❑us burial grounds in this area and one of our fanner councilmen has relatives `vv'ho are burled in caves by this area. I have spoken, to many of my neighbors .and residents of our town. I am very active in many mmunity organizations. Our veterans groups, which account for about 900 active members are Opposed to thrs. IRiOTARY, Knights of Columbus and Elks Lounge pars ❑nreI are also Concernec with the traffic, I ptopose you consider building a new park for our growing community in this area. This would Service our Ctirnmurtity greatty{. de Fonio* &-igincd I], N I F1 1_ O_ IVIALAF<I E September 13, 2021 Stantec Consulting Servkes Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek f$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Daniel Malakie 76-117 Kameham alu Street Kailuca-Kona, HI 96740 Via emril: RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawal"i Island Dear Mr_ Malakie-, Thank you for the comment letter dated August 2, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The biggest problern in Kona is traffic and impacts could occur at the traffic light at the Lako and Queen Kaahurn anu intersection with the addition of the proposed project. We need a 4 -lace highway from Henry Street to Kamehameho III Road. Response 1: The Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the EA) acknowledges the bottleneck that occurs at Lako Street. The traffic signal timing and phasing can be changed in the interim from split phasing to protected or protected/permitted or permitted phasing on Lako Street. The long-term solution is the widening of Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway. The widening of Queen Kca'ahumanu Highway from Henry to Karnehameha ill Road has been in the long-range transportation plan; however, this falls outside the scope of this project. Comment : There is terrible flooding in this area, especially over queen K. Highway bet,veen Pualani Esl ates and Lako Street, There is sheet flooding in this area and not much you can do to stop it. A new development will compound this problem. Response 2: Queen Kca'ahumanu Highway is owned and maintained by the Stote of Howai'i, together with the two culvert systems traversing Queen Ka'ahum anu Highway which transport the floodwaters of Holualoa Ditch and Horseshoe Bend Ditch below Queen Ka'ahurnonu Highway. The State has not indicated ony problems with being able to mairtain the highway or the culverts. and the proposed project would not increase the amount of water in the ditches (per Seciion 27-20 of the Hawaii County Cade). September 13, 2021 Mr, Daniel Mnlakle Page 2 of 3 Comment 3: ,Another major concern is for our grater. If there are 750 new apartments and ccndc s built, ;what will happen to our water supply and additional sewag e� There is already a strain on the existing wells and watershed, Additional schools will also be needed. Response 3: The Project is planned for 450 units, not 750 units. As described in Section 3.3.3 of the EA, the water credits for this project have already been committed and paid for. The Department of Water Supply assigns credits based on capacity, so the infrastructure can provide the water for this project, Potential impacts to schools through the addition of students frorn the project is described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA, and is not expected to have a major impact to local schools, Comment 4: There is a lack of paries and recreational areas in our community. If the County bought this piece of property, they could have o beautiful park, hiking trails, and show significant cultural landmarks. There are numerous burial grounds in this area and one of our farmer councilmen has relatives who are buried In caves by this area. Response 4: The project is consistent with medium density zoning and conforms to the guiding principles regarding urban growth patterns as defined by the Kona Community Development Plon. The applicant action being cansidered and analyzed on private land in the EA does reit include a proposal for change in zoning or creation of a public park. Although the project si`e has been ncrninoted for County sof Hawaii Public Access, Open Spoce and Notural Resources Preservation Commission (PONCE acquisition twice, bath times the Committee declined. Potential impacts to cultural resources cre described in Section 3.6 of the EA. The entire property has been inventoried and this section describes two burials that were located in the project site, which were removed and reinterred prior to 1984. There is one single burial on the project's 70 acres, and this burial has been approved for preservation by the State and Burial council. Based on these results, impacts to burials in the project site have been Mitigated. Comment 5: 1 am very active in many community organizations. Our veterans groups, which account for about 900 active members are opposed to this. ROTARY, knights of Columbus and Elks Lounge personnel are cab o concerned with the traffic. I propose ycu consider building a new park for our growing community in this area. Response 5: Impacts to traffic~ are described in Section 3.7.2 of the EA. Additionally, the applicant action being considered and analyzed on private land in the EA does not include a proposal for change in zoning or creation of a public park. September 13, 2021 Mr, Daniel Malakie Page 3 of 3 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If your have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Sfartec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.❑. mich4ele.lefebvre4stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department From; Zipn fer. ]eff F To; LePetbvm MIMIchekchrk Cc, Groalyd. )ohn Subject; NPS Cu mmentc Draft Environmental Assessment for Royal Vistas Dabs; Tuesday, AU9ust 25r 2020 3-52;45 PM Attachments: 2020 08 25 NES Ier,W rc. DEA.ndf Attached ple4se find our conimpntIc-tw, —Jeli Jeff Zimpfer. Ph,D, National Pafk Service Environmental Protection Specialist Kaloko-Honokbhau National Historical Park 73-4786 Kanalani St., 414 Kailua Kona, HI 96740 ph-- 808-329-6881 x15D0 fax_ 808-329-2597 Teff �irn❑fe�C�nrss.ac�v hit RIL�YiY'�r'�..11&.5:.QuL irE .tatm The National Park Service cares for special places saved by the American people so that all may experience our heritage National Park Servicc Kakiko-Honok6hau 7 3- 470 6 KH snal i ini Street# 14 MS. Department of the Interior National Historical Park KMua-Kuno, H,iwal.'i 96740 liW.329•6RF31 Phr)ne KE 3Z9•2597 N Kalok l-H0llrak6hau IN kJ:I'LY REFER TO: 1 -1621(2020-3) A ugust 25. 20210 Dr. Miche]Q Lefebvre Stacltec Consulting Services Inc. P.O' Box 191 v Milo. Hawaii 96721 Sud icct: National Park Scr�,Icc Comments for a Draft Envit-ormental Asscs."-nient for the Proposed Ruyal Vistas Llousuig Project, Island of Hau ai'i. Nl orth Kona District, TNMs: 7-6.021:016 and 7-6-021:017 Dear Dr. Lefebvre, The National Park Service commented for an early Consultation for the Environmental Asse:ssrnent (EA) for the Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Pro iect. Thank you for addressing our comments in the Draft EA. As a physically srrtall hark in a developing region, we depend on the careful and thoughtful actions of our neighbors to Protect the Fishponds, coast, and anchialine pools that are valuable cultural and natural resources for our community and our nation. Mahalo ror working with us to help protect this precious place. We have no further comments for the EA. 1 fyou have any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact Dr. .Jeff Cimpfer of my staff (808-329-6881 x 1500 or Jeff: zimpfeKKc mps.gov). Sittc:erely, . . )04-- fziov�' John Browaxd. Acting Superintendent Kaloko-Honokohau National Histot-ica.l Park EXPERIENCE YOURAMERI CA T w IN >1I iun.,1 Prii-k '-- -k. i, L. I-aA ,-M Ii i 1 1,1 -i ial plaers saved by the Amerlcan Ivopicsu tbt all may extrerlerier a"r heritage, September 13, 2021 S,tantec Consuffing Services Inc. P.O. Bnx 191 Hila, H'96721 Tel: 1808) 494.9039 Mr. John broward, Acting Superintendent Kaloko-Honokohou Notional Historic Park 73-4786 Ka no la ni Street # 14 Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Via e-mail: Jeff Z mpfer, jeff_simpfer nps.gov RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Dousing Project, North Kona District, Hawaii Island Dear Mr. Broward: Thank you for the letter dated August 25, 2020, in which you stated that the National Park Service held no further comments on the Environmental Assessment. We sincerely appreciate your review of the docvment. If you have any additicnal comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stanfec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre� stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of HawaPi Planning Department Mori, Ashle From: John RandeRson :fjr12]@9rnail.corrv> Sent_ Thursday, Atilt :st 27. 20202.23 Plat ITS Pk MNJWj OEPT To: Plannfng Internet Mail fikk 2E 2020 Pr' 12 SutsjOct: Royal Vistas Hots inn Project EZ Comments Aloha 1 live near this propused developinorit and wish Io mace LhC f011owFing submissintl: The Traffic Information Rq(wt (f1 R ) ( A1II'lleridLN I'woof the hA) measured peak, traliic. limes +1n two days: Tucsdav, April 30. 019 attcl Aug st 24 014. (page 125 of the h,A and numbered page () u! Appelidtx I TIOSI: cutis 110111 +~: elurCc 11« 111; Hest denlif%- traffic permili; which hL�-,., 1 :I, h1Lwven11_o and end in the lillltltiking �Aarcli 1'11al five-Illonth Nriod is the Pcriod during which J11u L'I !til r'o:l !% lv.v�ol ()Y Y 1 ii1[1whirtter1r+. m A]aska,. (',til.; da, aad other US stato (I w £;:k I1ci lel Ic': V tt•IL.: '.5 1111 w'I". �; ti c`•�Ir 1i:!. IllLI-L" 13CF iods 111:1t 111,1-111ri11L4nd traffi backs tip To Akoni Stivet 111 ihe nion111:!? as kati: X, I I<<111 11111-1 1, 0LAlla)O1111K '1.1111C bLL:1,, up ab far is HuttCalai i vad iii tht laic at''ivnIcm, 1'he prc,1,u-wii Roy7C 1'i lcl . 1,,I diii ly is in 111c- micirde of x°11:11 hLI.&A up traffic aid the prvposv� two %vav titop iII14:1-suctitSII 14'III :,i Ili ]A v 11,11 %vtt rk, t lIL'�L' .'i 111111 -irV 11AV.Ct.l tin my oI7ioviations as a mid0117 0 K-1011si Vista -S NILIk:C 24'11." hLit .0-C 114A -s6v Lit Y v1 r11ieLi. I hL, 1111k 4v as (ilr 1110111 11w he vcrilied is liar Kona I roc I l .(' ro r stibn,,tt ih:.- FI. - R 'k ah Iraffic data select l In n1 lWil {I:ttt'�- 111111111'_ tliat peak p; rilod (N - 11ur,ll}. 1 It �t.sitri.s, thL' 11=111 iti ilit;.l11 ilnt�',cv� been its iimli:1�~, arc L} tsi:d I)ti da c:%- 311a1 f'�lN Oul�idt peak 11-affic p104 LIS. tt OUPS 11W%iLIQ,. 4n unr"i�tie as -L--:selietlt 451. ilial .t- pt471 oI the L L-, iroiiiIie1!41 Impl icL (II dais sit hd ivi si o n. J01111 St'111:1 R 111(kA'lAi 76-4',5 ^ Lo1ani Strect September 13, 2021 5tantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Bax. 141 Hila, HI 98721 Tel: {$QS) 494.2039 Mr. and Mrs. Randerson 76-4353 Leilanl Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Via emvil: fjrl 234 gmail.com RE: Comments are Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Konya District, Haw ai'i Island Dear Mrs, Sonja Randerson and Mr, John Randerson: Thank you for the comr-hent letter dated August 27, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix Two of the EA) measured peak traffic flows on two days: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 and Thursday, August 24, 2019♦ Those dates exclude the highest density traffic periods which begin in November and end in the following March. The proposed Royal Vistas Roadway is in the middle of that backed up traffic and the proposed two way stop intersection will simply not 'work, Kona Three LLC should resubmit the TIAR with traffic data selected from two dates during that peak period (Nov -March). tesoonse I Historic Hawaii Department of Transportation (HRCT) courts show that the overall average weekdoy volume is fairly consistent throughout the year. While tourism traffic is higher during the winter months, summer break, and spring break, the overall traffic due to work and school being on break is also lower. A typical -school/work dray will usually have higher AM and PM peaks. It is this school peak hour in the AM and PM peak hours that the TIAR is Aimed at analyzing. We sincerely appreciate your review of the docurnent. If you have any addit[oncal comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (805) 4942039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@siantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning )Department ortvia Y. Ise 3.w-Y4'%N"A OFFICE DF FACILITIS: AND QPIFRATIONS SeptBm1 er 1. 2020 Michele Lefebvre Stantec Consulting Services P.O. Box 191 Hilo, Hawaii 96721 STATE OF HAVVAf l DEPARTMENT DF EDUCATION P,D BOX 2360 HONDLIJ1_tJ, i AW4fA I 1 %854 DR �er�snwt. Re- Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project Craft Environmental Assessmam North Dana_ Hawaii. TMK' 7-5-021:016. 017. 016. & 01�, Dear fps Lefebvre. The Hawaii State Department of Education (HI DOE) has the following comments for the proposed Royal Vistas Housing project jProject). Kona Three 1-7-C proposes to develop 450 multi -family units. a combination of rental and for sale units, and associated Improvements In North Kona. Island of Hawaii. TMK. 7-6-0211:(}1 S. 017. 018 & 019. The HIpOE previously provided comments or tha proposed Project by the enclosed letter dated December 10, 2019- As there are no changes to the previously reviewed Project we have no further comments. Thank yoo for the opportunity to cornmerits Should you have questions, please contact Robyn Loudermilk. ,acting Land Use Planner. l=alcilities Development Sran1~h, Planning Section, at (806) 761-5003 or via email at robyn.loudermIIkgk12.hi.us. Respectfully. ?`' 5 rl Kenneth G. Masden Il Public Works Manager Planning Section KGM:rll Enclosure c: Janette Snelling Complex Area Superirlterdent. > ;orokaa'Kealakehe- oilalo'Konawaena Complex Hawaii County Planning Department AN AFFIRMATIVE ACT10N AND EQUAL C}PPOR T ilk T =` Fkti'FI ^`'=R r5�vin v s`t� ilGetir FAImIL.ITU'INC, QFEIATrONS, lkcc,uht!r 10.D)1F4 'Michele Lcfiebvre Stantec Cm su71jng scr`, .(:C P.Cl. Bo- 141 lI o.Hjuftii. 0672" STATE OF R.AWAI•I DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION P 0 BOX 23611 >iDN 3LULU H1 WA 1968 4 R,-• [mirorli-nontal 3sSCSS CM F:Arlw Ir7r Propun,:d Ro+ al Vida, Housi-1g Rrniecr, Hawaii I %11.- ,-�&tt_ 1't)16. & t]I'. Nortb trona, !-k ail 1kar'.i,. lu}rclLrc 4R G#iR;T6`!x td, k19NiYtLrT� Thi 1Ia%kail Sialc Deprarmuns 01 hducstion C!3lDOE) has thl 1bIltming 4orr tolls for the prL,d Ro,}aI Vi -&as Ilvu!Y .iilu Pro -eect IPro itoI hccc.rdJ.L� tothu m, I-,arrniliazil pro �Id�a 1�s,7r1a "I� Te6 LLC' p-Tcpubes le de).ChIp4;4 mutli-t'am11} ir.its. n combIii ltiiln or r.rrlat arrid Erlr s,:lA• Liriiis- I.scaled in %mth Kr1na. IsIand ofIIaxiaji. 14a%%aI . 1 %:i ,.+4. Isrl!ir 11 i, inamn -wid Lln.+. 1UJ11V%VT ,Lair 11 rk l_ N%U Lw10'_IIAI --'%c1V0 1-00--hN LOP 141h[1l • ,�J:^ I a TcytAli I-�urram1 ,. _—'r41L71 1:'- I"" J.1 .';I .Ir, ,b.,d4f1:*I kaLIQrT1�riL.1r%. kahaF.il Itii 1ilw i'I L. ''. il. i]�'. Ih is�Il lkti,p,l. L': .. 13,:I I : _ I"•I ..IIL111High Iw 7r1 a1Y illrl8 ilitlLllL }l: l.w �IIP:Ya 111 3nd 15 "%p ` L k':I4 . c,in .t I; i', 'I "17. I'i,°`, I"i.. YII'ill!` IIIiwis iir titan-cfitti ONtl' Lj]1-.:1I alld " .11t L:Xpt% '0III_I6.1 ON.'I 11.1['.I. I... ';G''+.I ;I. ti` tA'..I• - TTIc pmpngcd llma ce:l iv ioc:, t!J %kil li lll� wt ,t II:�t+aii tiLk1t��! Jlep� i Fav C�r.tri�t_ Il Ittet�r 1L� 3rc+ Ltrrellllw C1tYt cr lh!clkn.w. impact ;&,5 TI'10 Ild'It11... AJUld 1:i., rO1'.,.,.ke .kcorI .;•i '1,: L 1klron'llunti] °1yaa4�-x9i�11,'. I'}t t;,N %. I hank Nou !Or 1110 r rrOrt inklk 10 Y:L7MMIC111. wllL7llid t(iLi pleasc wjll.14t 140h n to_ dcrmill%- Sdi will Lands Lind Fu}111ric! SNciali z�o_ I-acalitie4 l)6'.efopmen1 9ran L•h Pianr,in^I �l'dI111 aX►'��-�(N_t 0r L111 anal, 11 rob%n.Ifmd.d r°nilh,r)f T2.Etr,u, Re9WL:TfuJ!} , �.=nr:c:ll� C. �IaT�LI.n it I'vbI I4 1ti arks klanagkwr Ptnnnin , Section K ti N.l : rl l i A -t Snii7aCcmipIQw a,Vva nil QnT, I lcmfil,n.L•Kr:,,I:Il,sht f;I.htYI; L COMPIfN ,.Iran AN AFFIRMATVE ACTION AND E40UAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER September 13, 2021 5tantec ConsufF3ng 5ervkes Inc. P.O. Box 191 Hila, HI 46721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Mr. Kenneth G. Madsen ll, Public Works Manager State of Hawaii Department of Education P.0- Box 2360 Honolulu, HI 96804 RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONS1 for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Nortel Kona Disirlct, Hawaii Island Dear Mr. Madsen: Thank you for the letter dated September 1, 2020, in which you stated that the Sate of Ela al'i Deportment caf Education had no further con-ments on the Envlronmentcal Assessment. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email, Sincerely. Starrtec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. miche le, lefebvre@stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC NMaija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Fram: Melissa Matsuura To: VknFjhagd7aWJJMn -c- Cc: rKhard(D®astwestreattv.oro; Lefebvre. Mi&elg: rrr.clarenrkha+vaii.edu; bayo-d Lonbora; Rlchgrd b&glns:caat Subject. Comments ars the Proposed Royal Vistas Project Draft EA Date: Wednesday, September 02, 2020 2:27:12 PPS Attachrunts: 09-,32=2020 Hawali County PEarnnioa Curt Comments on Royal Vistas Housuna Draft EA.Ddf Aloha, rltrarlleci ate comments from 1crlxert Mcl:arera, Interim Director of the University of Hawaii InsIItute for Astronomy regarding the proposed Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project DEA, Tax Neap Key No. (3) 7-6-021:016-019, North Kona Distract, Island of Ha ai'i. Operations Coordinator University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy 2680 Woodlavvn Drive, C-205 Honolulu, Hawaii 9682) (808) 956-682.9 — direct aimatsuur4411awaii _edu El W N I K IM 8 15 1 T V OW M A W A l- 1 A T m x i- ra cbA Irvsarr ila liar ArrrrwomN Ofto glow 41re" September 2, 2020 Via email; Planning Department, County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hila, H1 96720 ALtention: Mr, Michael Yee (plannin�C�hawaiicl�unttr.�ov) Re. Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) Royal Vistas Housing Project TMK: (3) 7-6-021:016-019, North bona District, Island of Hawalri Dear Mr. Yee: Thank you For the oppoi,tunity to comment on the Draft Environmental Assessment for the proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project referenced above (published August 8, 2.020), specifically with respect to issues and concerns regarding light pollution. The University of Hawaii Institute for Astronomy (IFA) conducts research in astronomy using telescopes, located on Haleakala and Maunakea ,and operated by IfA and our partner institutions. Both Haleakala and Maunakea are among the best sites in the world for astronomical facilities because of their elevation, clear shies, favorable atmospheric conditions, and low levels of Iight pollution. Hawaii -based observatories have played major roles in the advancement of astronomy and astrophysics for over 50 years and are well positioned to remain at the forefront of astronomical research for decades to come. Because of the outstanding quality and productivity of these facilities, lfA is acutely concerned about negative impacts on astronorny from increased light pollution. Cour work to combat light pollution has also brought us into contact with others concerned about light pollution for other re:lsans, including impacts on wil€lliXe (particularly sealbir€ls) �mct on human health. While IIA's comments focus on the impacttis of light pollution on astronomy, appropriate mitigation measures also help to reduce non -astronomy impacts. With that background, we offer the following comments-. Any new or additional artificial light at night has an adverse effect on astronomical observations by increasing the night sky brighMess. Dearly all observations performed by the telescopes on Maunakea are sky -background liinited. This means that there is a natural sky brightness coming from airflow and zodiacal light. Artificial light increases the sky brightness, thereby decreasing the sensitivity of the telescopes. Lights can have an adverse effect on astronomical observations by incrementally increasing the night sky brightness, effectively making the telescope smaller and less sensitive. fwd W;44A,&-,, Un.* b WWWA" r 10.10 Planning Department, Counly of Hawaii Mr. Michael Yee Page 2 ?appropriate steps to reduce the impact on the observatories would include. 1. Any lighting al the facility must follow the Hawai'i County lighting ordinance. All lighting must be fully shielded. This means that all lighting fixtures must emit zero light above the horizontal plane. 2. The minimum possible amount of outdoor lighting should be used. Motian sensor activated lighting is strongly preferred. Blue light is most harmful to the observatories, so blue -deficient lighting should be exclusively selected. The test choices are filtered LED lights, or amber LED lights. Under no circumstances should high-intensity discharge lamps such as metal halide be used; fluorescent lights also must be avoided. Both of these types of lamps use mercury and emit light at wavelengths that is very daniagi cog to astronomy. . White light should be avoided because the blue component of white light is very damaging to gastronomy. White light should always have a Correlated Color Temperature of 2700 K or below. Thank you for your consideration of these comments and attention to lWs concerns. if you have €lrrestions or need further detail regarding these cornments, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned or Richard Wainscoat rrjw@hEawaii.e_dll). Very _ ,uly yours, Robert McLaren Interim Director cc; Mr. f�ic.hard Wheelock, Konda Three LLC (richardCo)e-,rstwestr-ealty.=) Ms. Michele Lefebvre, Stantac Consulting finichele.lefebvr•e(�)stantec.coni) September 13, 2021 S,tantec Consulting Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek t$QS) 494.2039 ,Mr. Robert McLaren University of Hawaii at Mdroa Institute for Astronomy 2680 Woodlown Drive, C-205 Honolulu, HI 96899 Via email: mmatsuur@hawca1i.edu RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONS1 for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, H awaal'i Island Dear Mr. McLaren - Thank you for the comment letter dated September 2, 2020, an the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: Lights can have an adverse effect on astronomical observations by incrementally Increasing the night sky brightness, effectively tacking the telescope smaller and less sensitive. Appropriate steps to reduce the impact on the observatories would include: 1. Any lighting at the facility must fallow the Hawaii County lighting ordinance. All lighting mast be fully shielded. This means that c -ill lighting fixtures must emit zero light above the horizontal plane. Resaonse 1: The project has considered potential Impacts to night sky brightness and incorporated protection measures to minimize these potential impacts. As described in Section 3.3.4 of the EA in impacts to biological resources, the project would not involve any unshielded lighting for either construction or operation, in ccnformonce wilh Hawaii County Cade § 14 - 50 et seq. Additionally, during operation the site would use lighting only where and when it is needed for safety purposes. No project construction using unshielded equiprnent muintenonce fighting would occur after dark between the months of April and October. All additional permanent lighting would conform to the Hawai'i County Outdoor Lighting Ordinance {Howaf"i County Cade Chapter 9, Article 14), which requires shielding of exterior lights so as to lower the ambient glare caused by unshielded lighting_ The proposed project would also avoid nighttime construction from Sepien:ber 15 through December 15 (to avoid during the seabird fledging period). These measures would also reduce potential impacts to the observatories. Comment 2: The minimum passible amount of outdoor lighting should be used. Motion sensor octivanted lighting is strongly preferred. Blue light is most harmful to the observatories, so blue-deticient lighting should be exclusively selected. The best choices Q� Sep ember 13. 2021 Mr. Ra Bert McLaren Parje 2 of 2 are filtered LED lights, or amber LED lights. kinder no circumstances should high-intensity discharge lamps such as metal halide be used; fluorescent lights also must be avoided. Both of these types of lamps use mercury and emit light at wavelengths that is very damaging to astror7cmy. White light should be avoided because the blue component of white light is very damaging to astronomy. White light should always have a Correlated Calor Temperature of 2700 K or below. Response: As described in Section 3.3.4 of the EA, the use of outdoor lamps with wanner colors (less blue light) and energy efficient fixtures would be considered when the building is being constructed. Additicnnfly, the project does not anticipate using metal halide and fluorescent lights. To minimize Project impacts from lighting, the fallowing text has been added ro Section 3.3.4 of the EA to address your comment, ''Subject to local rules and regulations, the Proposed project would utilize lighting on the 2700 degrees Kelvin scale in response to a public comment received on the Draft EA regarding potential impacts to astrononmy." We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. It you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494.2039 or by email. Sincerely, Sfantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D_ mic i� e le.lef ebvre@ stantec.ca m CC' Richard Wheelock, Dona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Howol'i Planning Department :f'vEHWi'aFC Ibis N-1-1chelcLefebvre St:wtec Consulting Inc. 1' t ?. 11oN 1() I I lobo. l i.atiwlll1 907161 Dear Ms. Ufi�bvrc� STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSFORTATION 86=`) F'U1-4C HBOW L !7 REET HONOLULU, HAVVAII W813-5097 September 3. 2020 Sttb•rcct Dmfs Env ronrtionial Asses meat 1DEAi Royal Visws I lousing Project North Kana, Island oi'Ilatwaii. Hawaii Tax Map Key Nos.; (3)'7-6-021: OW 017, 015, and 019 LIiW-G 10k s h%Wy Gkacw LYNN AS ARAW-FIEGAk L�pCxd CHOW uc,�s M HIIiA"Prl Lrrl INN BMIFFFN IN REFL`i REFER TO D1R 0740 144 x' -PS 2.3918 Ibc applicant, Kona Three t_I-C propo.ws to develop 70 acres ot'vacant land into a enaalti-tarzily residelltittl SLLINJIN-i'.11031. 1 a w:11 11UIJ. lc1_at is estit aced a -150 units with 259 ul its planned as ?hale 1, The propcoy Is IoCaatwd 0I) '17C 17101.111-2 >Idc cr1 Gleet Kaaahlumaanu Highway between Kona Vista SubdiviAon and i'ualani Lstatcs Suhdi� kion. [. ir,lw c�t�� rc�.3L1w� ate i planned to prr}6de access Lisa' I'11use I "litch inter Hca; with OLILCIL Er,[aIhr11ia,1r;1a I IIgh uy (Slate Route 1 l ). approximately 600 IM north or the iriterick•tit'll %% ][h Kilta w I IJigh gay, The 17F A shmild iaiclLide n ltydrolnric arid 11�-drauiic study Ott-theprop,),�cd changcs to the I lcar,e,hoe Rend Dra inaagewa y dcpicted (?I) thk- FIRM Map Panel 155 I r.,o1)9i-2F where the c.xistitl LP 1:ulverts on Quc:t*n K�1n3tntz 11ha,t y tasty b ianparc°ted. 'I'hc DLA should alsaa note the proposed access Lo Queen Kaahumanu H i v h at,, will aarparenfly con with and impact the cxitingdrainage cul vcrts. The DraII 1 rul-f1c Incl lit :Analysis Rclicirt CHAR) loo [tie lits%al Vistas. cl;iird Nlay ?()-'0, weals included as an-%pjIcndk to the DFA, Hawaii 11 cparamcut (ct Transportation (HDOT) has reviewed tlse '71? L Enid has the following cm=ents rclel, aflt to State highways: l . The ` IAR is included as part of a DFA rtx-o iitrLI law ChLl; trr 141. 11,r.N aii Itc-v iwcd StatattCs for the subject pro oct for the use; ofCouIitr Iand. .'. Ph��ase I of'the project is exls� pected tohc: ecgrr>Ipleted by ?(~'4 1.ith the a�tilk I�ra�pca;ecl aytc:Q� heing [Ile III01141"Ld Royal Visl as Roadway 611;rsel''iion with Ot:.`t'll h.aaahunli lntt Highway, ThV, pre puscd accekw as a 1411-interseCUOTI On the Statc 1.•igh�wUv. ww 11ch is a. nia-jor arierial. i, IXu1 kh 1'fable and arltemative csptions should be explored. Alternative Ms. Michele L.etebvre September 3. 2020 Page 2 HVW-PS 23918 options should include comecliuns of `minor collecior4' running parallel tea (ween Kaahumanu Highway from the official 1'ransp rtation N:m-ork Mala - Nani Kailua Area from [tic Kona Community Development flan. I lige include extending I lonnaana Street to I-ciIa»i Street,. and Paulehia S€rtct Lo Kckuunaaa PIace which nia: he done in phase I to prop idc access to the project. The aIwmative analysts should ineIWe impaetS LO [IIe "lULl�! area intersections of Queen Kaahuma.nu highway %VialouI Ow proposed Loyal 'Vistas 1�oadway intersection. 3. Fltr: HAR diould ittrlude ;z phasing Flan and the transportation improvemems of each I IIIc 4114ILIId Inc ILide the road ltayouI and rircolattion within the project 11oreuch. plea L!- 4. I he 'HAR should provide a mitigation analysis T'trr the snaen cAlons that operate at 14-k 01 i'd' Service E or lower. 5. The HAR slinulr iiielude an estimate of regional traffic imprin ements haled on a pro -rata basis. h. Flic 1100T requests u design sctbui:k or 3t) ie:d from the existing Queen Kuiwnnunu Highway righkof=way for future roadway improvements. 7. The summary and recommendations of the TL.'LR do stat include the proposed left turn lalle .trzd right foal ]fall&: 10r I.111c ROY it VISINS RUILdwfay. Then: iS olid rtia ttlient14111 Of iharuieliaation, a refuge lane. or a crosswalk. li No: 1 h;;k �: :int• cpic,,l (111N. !Ak2,-I,o contact kyan Thir-ugnanain. Systoles Planning Erg'tn=r. I Iii1 % ivs Olvishm. I'i:l]a1tt V Branch at (908) 587-631.16 ,r by email at jcy �si.tltintgstartaaww�� J�tawuii.gca _ Please ret'ererue file rLn I'm number I'S 2020-12Ci. 5i nc�crawly, .IAUF. T. BU TAY Director sal"Uransportation September 13, 2021 S,tantec ConsutFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek i$QS) 494.2039 Mir. Jade Butoy. Director of Transportation State of Haw ai'i Department of Transportation 869 Punchbowl .Street Honolulu, HI 95813 RE: Comments on Draft Environmentall Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawaii Island Dear Mr. Butey: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 3, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment .1.: The DEA should include a hydrologic study of the proposed changes to the Horseshoe Bend Drainagewcy depicted en the FIRM Map Panel 1551660952E inhere the existing culverts on Queen Kaahumonu Highway may be impacted. The DEA should also ride the proposed access to Queen Kaahum anu Highway will apparently conflict with and impact tie existing drainage culverts. Response I Please see the response prepared by Mr. Ty Dempsey of Dempsey Pacific Inc, enclosed. Mr. Dempsey is the Civil Engineering consultant for Kona Three LLC, the applicant for this project. Comment 2. Phase I of the project is expected to be completed by 2024 wifhk the only proposed access being the proposed Royal Vistas Roadway infersection with Queen Koahurnanu Highway. This proposed access is a full -intersection on the State highway, which is a major arterial, is not advisable and alternative options should be explored. Alternative options should include connections of 'minor collectors' running parallel to Queen Kaeahumaanu Highway from., the official Transportation Network Map - Nani Kailua Area from the bona Community Development Plan. These include extending Hoom ana Street to Leilani Street, and 'Paulehia Street to Kekucnaoc; Place which may be done in Phrase I to provide access to the project. The alternative analysis should include impacts to than study area intersections of Queen Kaahurnanu Highway without the proposed Royal Vistas Roadway intersection. Response 2: The minor collector roads located within the project site would be built and dedicated by the project to the County of Hrawcai'i, but these collectors cannot connect Ho'omama Street to Leilcani Street due to two intervening properties (ane on the north of project and one on the south) that are not awned or controlled by the Kona Three LLC. Kekuona'oo Place would be connected to the project's connector reads in Phase ll tas outlined in the TIAR and EA), bul cannot be connected to Paulehia Street due to the intervening property on the north sine of the Project which is not awned or controlled by Kona Three. 1 111111611 September 13. 2021 Mr-Jade Butay P je2of7 Comment 3: The TZAR should include a phrasing plan and the transportation improvements at each phase. This should include the road layout and circulation within the project for each phrase. Response 3: Figure 2 hos been revised to show that access to the project site would not be connected to Kekuano'oa Place from Lake Street until Phrase II. Comment 4; The -IAR should provide a mitigation analysis for the intersections that operate of Level of Service (LOS) P or lower. Response 4a The only intersection that operates at LOS E or lower is the intersection at Queen Ko'chumanu Highway and Lrako Strut in year 2039 AM Peak period (see Tables 27 and 28 on pages 53 and 54 of the TIAR), which is due primarily to Queen Ka'ahumanu northbound through traffic coupled with Queen Ko ahumanu Southbound Left movement and L❑ko Street Eastbound left movement.. Section VI., Item 8 on page 57 of Ine TIAR provides the fallowing mitigation analysis for that intersection: "Queen Kaahu-n anv Highway and Lako Street: The LcakcD Street intersection operates at LDS E/D (AM/PM) with or without the Royal Visfas oroject in the 2039 scenario. Lake Street currently has split phrasing (sequential rather than concurrent) can the Lake Street approaches. Charging the phasing from sprit to protected left turns would help lower the delay. This intersection would also improve significantly it Queen Kaahumanu Highway is widened to 4 lames as in the 2035 Transportation Plan. ' Comment 5: The TIAR should include an estimate of regional traffic 1mpioverr1ents based on a pro -rata basis. Response 5: Boxed on our understanding of the HDOT Proportlonal Share Impact Fee Methodology. a transportation fee is charged to new development projects to pay for regional transportation improvements needed as a result of the new development. The fee is proportional to the project's impact. The method for determining the pro -rata share of regional transportations improvements is as follows: (1) list project -related regional transportation improvements determined by TIAR, (2) determine the cost of each regior3ai transportation improvement, (3) identify project's percent of trips towards each regional transportation improvement based on critical peak hour, (4) natal project's cost towards regional tronspartotion improvements, and (5) apply the project's total pro -rata share cost towards one or more HDOT initiated regional transportation improvements or require the developer to irnplernent one or more regional transportation improvements. The TIAR analyzes traffic conditions for existing conditions, 2024, 2029 and 2039 with and without the proposed project. The conditions for future years with and without the project mirror existing conditions: delays for stop controlled traffic at Hucalalal (N) and (S) and Kuakini Highway. The delays worsen with time and added traffic_ However, the signal controlled interseafions operate at overcall L05 D or better (acceptably) for 2024 and 2029 with and without the proposed project. In 2039, again all of the sigr,ol controlled intersections are expected to operate at LCIS g or Sep ember 13.2021 qtr. Jade Butay Page 3 of 7 better (occeptcably) with or without the project, except for the Lcako Street intersection, ire the AM peak hour, when the analysis showed it is expected to operate at LOS E with or without the project. As the highway is widened to 4 Imes, the LOS is expected [o improve significantly. Further, the LOS can be improved by changing from split phasing (sequential) to concurrent phasing for the side street traffic. There are nc regional transportation improvements needed as ❑ result eaf the proposed project, other than building the Royal Vistas Roadway access intersection, which the applicant would fund of 100 percent. Comment b: The HDOT requests a design setback of 30 feet from the existing Queen Kaahumanu Highway right-of-way for future roadway irnprovernents. Response _§: Where possible. Kona Three LLC would accommodate a design setback of 30 feet from existing Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway for future right-of-way Improvements. Comment 7: The surnmary and recommendations of the TEAR do not include the proposed left tura lane and right turn lane for the Royal Vistas Roadway, There is also no mention of channelization. a refuge lane, or a crosswalk. Response 7.: The TIAR does propose a left turn and right turn lane for Phase 1 and Phase II. As stated in the TZAR lAppendix 2, on. page 21), "A crosswalk would be provided cin the east side of the intersection for pedestrian connectivity. A refuge Ione for westbound left turns onto Queen Kca'ahumanu Highway is recommended as this is an unsigricE!ed intersection and will nuke this turn easier for the driver." We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stcantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, MID, michele_lofebvre stantec_com Enclosure cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC MaIja Jackson. County of Ha oi'i Planning Department Dempsey Pacific Inc. CMI Engineering DMgn & consuiling services rktoh" 19. 2020 Mr. ;!S had Wheelock gona Three LIC ICI Rualalai 5treek ritttl,111 96720 5rrbject:-„I5bAg Lu9mrt InrarMMpor, for QUe-0+ Kaahumdeu h•ti h wayr tnter3e+ ign IrnproVer'tims '�nyalVistas Ouppr K,)aPuwaru Highway Prewmbnary EnSwieering Assistance \,wIh Komi, ilei, .: III ! T%V ;,j 7 i, 0' 1 0It• O'ear Kwa Three ILC v4•r h.kve rv” to ,,,,'d the review lcr•r ',rz"asi the Ame or Hz*j11 17epartmen o' Transportation, r@ coding r1r.1'7 -rivirorkmen[.wl essesstrr m POT reverence CIR 0740. HWY ?S 2-3918). Ttle tt 1''t '1-wr1 of IK- rntrrrgeHnn far the^ R;ryib liiara-, r,::',rt,. q meinecttnn with Qur vet Kaahma<vw 11ph7v 7w , x71.,17:'- 1 :'n be within the exiling 12€1' wvIde per,,:,l l it v; kitation WP vw hhmlt the hijRhv4,1-( s •,hvPrt C.rooshnlg fax +lW.WShoe Bend dee% re. I. within the lefh side oh the eximmR I ' O' wldt permllwd accoss locatr"on. Basad m the ROVi v. -i"d topograok ssmruay of ills enrslirrg Lulwert a6d headwai0locatioru as-0wil- t,o•i, tele Original 111. .: Jy cssnstruc k;H1, Chit northern ma%I peer on of !h,? l ?C' twldp Iiarnrtth±ri.w:r.e .r'r.s:oEl .:.a'- ,1 the t:Hr lrng kvlvvrt iia ;;ln leer t€ 4 yltljs rn' at,ly, ,f t :.I' S .,'s. .rY VA ,ii,, entro,)rh ink13 thL. raft wig 1?4' wrtde prtrmined xt t:i ,s by •` Twra prppoied interwtion is plalv%ed more ay chin the sou -b mtn rsnrtiah n` ra'- .., .,:: t 'I., vM,tte rrir--1d :t<cr;s inewderto allow the existing htghway cutvert rrO.Idjng -e rerrb. t„_•- �r, {1���.1, t"r• -/1 ,.ri+g OUVOI,iK-°x ;,ry 11 lit culmk uab6in& The 4awLti-ItUdI i,`tt±rtrCtlialir t. „ :r• , .., ,. thR. RtrY.xx ': I iladway p + '1': ,houlders Owl 49,(V Prem thu nrrrtf-eerr fxl;r raerrrlittrrxactess, and u4I•,, 1 1:0' frum the stwthern ptawk ul tl,e 170' wile permit- v. the pfebrntnzry tocailarr a11.)',, : I edges of pavements farthe radlvVs of the inters: ,t •j remin within the eY15tlrtig I ',' ;rl ,°r_, , —ri ,.o r ,;, I„,,. -.,leen .end rernain dear of the cdsteng nghwray [filbert heAW$rti w d V,1,ull ,,,•.. 'r ,.;. :,,, :: r 1.,yout 15 Cil of th* s0uti*1'n vvjlt pont of Ij* 12(y W06L'Pf ftllhd ttiy ,1,;, e,.ee,'I, .,It -,,•'I,rpawed shoulder no thenintrar;er,imtatkts'[othe MRO' Int tjv { 01M.ttrd a7cras% tt Vx010 hr Air tisih7l. to sr`ili rhe Rnyral Vi%l l r0iadwwry rip ra, 4 W funhrr wxuth If preferrod Juriri,� "i„aI e,inslcuL!w„ IAaA d1*r::rnal Stig raOr,liO wilhirt [III- t RNktn'ly LI(Y kl Permitted ,ltcrss Isxi6vi,. .. , I., i, !+I 96E:6 1 [AGA.'I 117,] 9.i3 •. ...'.,� i•. ,.,`, ,,,.'-, I °,r r.,'j I ymwM,d(rq: t.r41,.au r, C Luke, J1 it - h'a-yid k°r19;eaI� .71 l;asrhurrrrrrutl{i0%ir.ip[SYYCr.wL1111 C" -,W P. 262fN r:tee ? o: _' Aaackad as az i -retry a -' [he 9Q',NW' Map rantirming the WL-," Dr the "iski% 12CV v o#e pernvlled access TNn. ICNo]Itrio malc'hrls th•r:� cctnrtlpNdt,.L1 in[mrmtlor+ pl Sr• A% The 1,20' wide pemnittad access Iocatiarr starts 130.54' tram tltr" nfi'rtbern p*pper.y Itr? corner_ The refnnant rortsuvcCim p rrel matches the eorx-ep'tual Irrsnrsect, !on plan, and we are abl,ato keep the pn2pailo-d "Vista roadway Improvements outside or the extstlns remnant constrtrctran pmlrcek AttacJwd is a Grapy rr' 7 tn4'mgYaphlc survey qt the e3LLihng hifihwaary Euhrert crossmil Thss tapcgraph+c swarvey ftws 0,, c,,, -Lx& I;,%.'exm of Me three {3I eKast ng struciur-41 p4ii pie arch ctAverts buill as pari 0 [h��iP,in.; l ic}wwlytcal .:,%It:tlnv E3ar 0 oo ibewrveyed inmatlarts or I i, ,I 1•. °rt hrodwall and wlnpwalls, Oa wide p rmt it" mimss kN Qatlm, and [he piiefif inary FFlayal VNst;:Ysroadway locatbr C% . , r,,,,.- ;' i V , , ..;dway rj1t14 erti7n f-drt br' corstrl lr!r•: w.,—hoka f%nylrlg-.c: rv. - I ,,i: I ...• .. .-ctassir% Si'rce Thf. PxIsTme I lr}rmr,.lot- tr, ,, 1,1. r -vi' treming:7nd drat • . , - r rerSY ; on Cfl rtim to Ow loory+tur r,"f isr•r; !a' :,j,; rAW Would acCUr 416 fadirt U' Cite pru[1[ +x! ;r'.,f PSCtt Kiri irnpn3P6t@nWmk% S11 IL 01 NnRO. IL] the bydri..,1- ;ar hydr;%1k Loorglion, �)r q,,,=Nt5fS4.4C��N7a,� �I!cl wONW C}cCw, ih42 , Ka,dintr' I ;od In kirari c Study t" 5} artd FEMAfk)od Conditi nr.for this highway culvert crossiog locatior mll remaw ja1ad, and a neva siudiv would natbE applitah$e .f Nhr rr n •tlry [jr:'.rrri:v. rlaeaarrfimg thif,tr9nrmmion. plmsp Poet rr"tocontact mr :at kr err by I*1eme at lNOR] 7'77-2041 Sincerely, �y 2 Tv Do swy, P•E , C Civii Engins u rlkkr�,•hrtiCr;s; q()WMap Topcgraph io: cmrvec y of exi.&tirp; , tiI,- - r' i:rc�Zing, Ixjtialn T"i? Rnw 101? i. t1-nA ayl'.,.i. + I I JAFIF, ;PF7 07.1; r�*riN�rlett�rr';r4ti'L3{fa �. rom I . "'OU rar- �• ` � 3a e Sc ca 9a� -`A i k 'i a.. 1 i From: Honda. Kyle ] To; I arehvrd_ MlcheCt Subject, DEA for Royal Vistas Houswng JW: 7.6.021:016, 017, 418 and 019) Dwtvo Thursday, 5eptetnbeT 03r 2024 2:36:30 PM Attachments: QLIV_�tm+its_QEA.Iat'Sr�Ista;�Jisl�+Q,edf Hello Michele, Attached are my comments for the "RayaI Vistas housing Project Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact" (TMK: 7-6-021.016, 017, 018 and 019). Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions or concerns regarding my comments. Thank VauI Kyle Honda County of Hawaii, Department of Public Works, Engineering Division 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy, Bldg. D Kailua-Dona, HI 96740 Tel_ (808) 323-4854 Email: kriej.�;araCdihav�aicr�untu_;av Horny swim 1A01— Run Tniumaln ScpiembLr 3. 2020 Michele L.el ebvre Stiontec C onsid ng Inc, V. 0. Box I to I Hilo. 111 96721 11ulifU ltf 13iulaI`I Aulauui ('enter Ir)I V4LY.::II itYccl a11s.0 ' Pili.• I'iewgl k kg1lx91XII•x :1 r3mIJt11@iIq*1.84311 pnlaii._ua+ll,wv*Itau'u,Islilip l% 41 Pi. WaJ1sn7illVd Via eMiI to- MiClli 1C tC1l -h�rc' d Q:rrilee.COIrJI 11115 Id i akaka tit UJ u. P.Iv',. 1 tire, wr It' •11114-1111, .E-. Subject: Royal Vistas Dousing Prrjec" Draft Eru,ravrnenta.l Assessrn(,r i and Anticipates Finding a` No Significant impact Tax Map Key (J) 017. 018 and 019 We ha;1e reviewed thle Craft Environmental Assessment and anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact and our comments are Is t€ flows. 1 Flood zones AE and AEI= affect the subject parcels as designated by the Fled Insurance Rate Map 1FIRM) New construction and substantial Improvements shall comply with Chapter 27 — FloJ-clam, 11jana�i9rrrent —cif the Hawaii Code, 2, Drainage improvements to Holua! ;- -1 1 :1 +,xray and the Horseshoe Bend Urainapeway shall I sub+nitted ;41+1 k Y i tment of Public Warks for review and approval, hould there be any questlolns concerning this s -la,.!- I Please feel fi ee k i c-nkact Kyle Honda of our bona Engmeerrng Division office at 323-4c854 f -k BEN I4c.—e SF111, Division Chief Engineering Division KH Copy- i NG-HILOIKONA, Planning Dapartiiwnt t`YKm11v of Fltiwilo 1 i; atslqu:ll t'ippnrtyanYa� Fhn�aic�r:11x1 I:tttl�Natirr September 13, 2021 S,tantec Consutfing Servkes Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek t$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Ben Ishii, Division Chief Deportment of Pudic Works, Engineering Division 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 7 Hilo, FII '�b720 Via email: Kyle Honda, kylej.honda@howalicounty.gov RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawai'i Island Dear Mr. Ishii: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 3, 2020. an the Draft Environrnental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project_ Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment T: Flood zones AE and AEF affect the subject parcels as designated by the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). New construction and substantial improvements shall comply with ChapEer 27 - Floodplain Ms`anagernent - of the Hawaii Code. Response 1: As described in Section 3.3.2 of the EA, the project would follow County regulations and policies including Chapter 27 of the Hawal'i County Cade. Comment 2: Drainage improvements to Holualoci Drainage way and the Horseshoe Bead Droinageway shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval, Response 2: Kona Three LLC would coordinate with the Department of Public Warr eg arding the final design of the improvement projects for the Horseshoe Bend and Holualoa Drainages as described in Section 3.3.2 of the EA. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or qjesticm about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494m2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc, Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mict'ielc-.Iefebvre@stcnfec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jackson,. County of Ha ai'i Planning Department From; Robert Harris Ta; e r Cc, alannhaftaVAjim..:r.^ Subject; RE. Royal Vist2,� Ii4�:.; np Project Deft: Monday, September 07. 2020 8:49:31 AM Attachments: Awal Vistas Housipa Pmiea Ietteraidf Aloha, 1 live in Kona Vistas' subdivision and am attaching a Ietter ire reference to r"v objection to Royal Vistas having access to their project through Kona Vistas' Subd1vIS10n. Malialo forthe opportunity to present my coin Idents regarding this project. Robert D. Harris 76-4323 Ke tlanaoa Place Kailua Kona, 141 96740-6958 September 7, 2020 RE= Royal Vistas Housing Project Aloha, My wife, $onnie, and I have lived in Iona Vistas Subdivision for over two years. We very much enjoy our home and look forwardtoo many more Years of enjoyment_ our home is located on Kekuanaoa Place which currently is the anly access to Royal Vistas Housing Project specified on the Royal Vistas' plans. When we purchased aur lot airnostfour years ago we were not informer! of this project or Kekuanaoa Place as being the only access to the Royal Vistas Housing Project. The Royal Vistas Housing Project owner presented to Kona Vistas' owners their plans forth e Royal Vistas Housing Project and what it would look like. They had proprased two entrance/exits to thhei r project from Kona Vistas and two entrance/exits from a subdivision on the north side of their project, Pualani Estates, One of the accesses from Kona Vistas, not Kekuanaoa Place, requires permission from the owner of the property for access the Royal Vistas which has been denied by the owner from my understanding. Also, the two accesses from P ualanl Estates requires Loyal Vistas to be granted access across a strip of land awned by another owner who has also denied Royal Vistas access to their project from my understanding. This only leaves Kekuanaoa Place in Kona Vistas as the only access to Royal Vistas Housing project. Since Queen K Highway is adjacent to Royal Vistas Housing Project there should be access from this highway and notfrom Kona Vistas Subdivision, Kona Vistas only access is from Queen K Highway by i_ako 5t. for our subdivision with 200 hornesites. Royal Vistas Housing Project is slated for 490 hornes Condos, sonne rental units and some purchased units). If Kona Vistas has only one access to it's subdivision why shouldn't Royal Vistas only access be aueen K Highway as well. Why should Royal Vistas have an access through Kona Vistas and allow all their traffic, including the construction equipment traffic over the next 2€1 years of their development, to drive through Kona Vistas Subdivision? Royal Vistas Housing Project with 494 units has almost 2.5 times larger density and this traffic should not be funneled through Kona Vistas Subdivision_ Mahalo foryour time, Robert D. Harris 76-4323 Kekuanaoa Place September 13, 2021 S,tantec Consulting Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Mr. Robert Farris 76-4323 Kekuana'oo Place Kafluca-Kona, HI 96740 vita email: both-home,-�: can-caiLcor, RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Mousing Project, North Dona District, Hawal'i Island Dear Mr. Harris: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 7, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment I. Our home is located on Kekuancaca Place which currently is the only access to Royal Vistas Housing Project specified on the Royal Vistas' dans. When we purchased our lot almost four years ago we were not informed of this project or Kekuanaoa Place as being the only access tc the Royal Vistas Housing Project. Response 1: The project would be accessed in two different ways, As described in Section 3.,7,2 of the EA, Koala Three LLC proposes to construct a new intersection Royal Vistas Roadway at the project's intersection with Queen Kc'ahumanu, The second access point would be from Kekuanci'ca Place, which would not occur until Phase H of the project. Figure 2 has been revised to show that access to the project site would be connected to Kekuana'oa Place from Lako Street during Phase II of the project. At project completior, there would be two ways to access the project. Comment 2: The Royal Vistas Housing Project owner presented to Kona Vistas' owners their pians for the Royal Vistas Housing Project and what it would look like. They had proposed two entrance/exits to their project from Kona Vistas and two entrance/exits from a subdivision on the north side of their project. Pualani Estates. One of the accesses from Kano Vistas, not Kekuanaoa Place, requires permisslar from the owner of the property for access the Royal Vistas which has been denied by the owner from my understanding. Also, the two accesses from Pualani Estates requires Royal Vistas to be granted access across a strip of land owned by another owner who has also denied Royal Vistas access to their project from my understanding. This only leaves Kekuancoa Place in Kona Vistas as the only access to Royal Vistas Housing Project. Response 2: The plans for access into the development have evolved over time based on discussions with various stakeholders, Section 2.3 of the EA describes how access from Pualani Estates from Poulehia ,Street was an alternative Q� Sep ember 13, 2021 Mr. Rabert Harris P rje 2 of 2 considered but eliminated from detailed analysis. The project as described in Section 1.2 and analyzed in this EA for approval presents two access points for the project, from ca new intersection (Royal vistas Roadway at the project's intersection with Queen Ko'ahurnanu) in. Phase I and from Kekuana'oa Place in Phase II. Comment 3: Since Queen K Highway is adjacent to Royal Vistas Housing Project there should be access from this highway and not from Kona Vistas Subdivision. Kona Vistas only access is frorn Queen K Highway by Lako Street for our subdivision with 200 homesites. Response 3: A small number of'left turn out` {southbound} vehicles will be pushed through Kekauna"aa Place and Lako Street. For emergency reasons, it would be beneficlol if more then eine access is provided to any development. The n -Oster plan for this area shows connecter streets parallel to Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway through these developments to purposely provide connectivity redundant to Queen Ka'ahumonu Highway. This is not o new or recent concept in the area. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email.. Sincerely„ Stantec Consulting Services Inc. r Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. min. `1 e le.le tebvreC�star7tec.cc�rn CC: Richard Wheelock. Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawol'i Planning Department Standard Comments for Land Use Reviews Clean Air Branch Hawaii State Department of Health It your prcposed project' Requires an Air Pollution Control Permit You must obtain an air pollution control permit from the Clean Air Branch and comply with all applicable conditions and requirements_ If you do not know if you need an air pollution control permit, please contact the Permitting Section of the Clean Air Branch. S Includes construction or € e -iol tion ac-ivities that involve asbestos You must contact the Asbestos Abasement Office in the Indoor and Radiological Health Branch_ Has the potential to generate fugitive dust You must control the generation of all airborne, visible fugitive dust. Note that construction activities that occur near to existing residences. business, public areas and major thoroughfares exacerbate potential dust concerns. It is recommended that a dust control management plan be developed which identifies and mitigates all activities that may generate airborne. visible fugitive dust. The plan, which does not require Department of Health approval, should help you recognize and minimize potential airborne, visible fugitive dust problems. Construction activities must comply with the provisions of Haati Administrative Rules. §11- 60 1-33 on Fugitive Dust, In addition, for cases involving mixed land Lase, we strongly recommend that buffer zones be established, wherever possible, in ruder to alleviate potential nuisance complaints. You should provide reasonable measures to control airborne, visible fugitive dust from the road areas and during the various phases of construction. These measures include, but are not liimited to, the following: a) Planning the different phases of construction, focusing on minimizing the amount of airborne, visible fugitive dust -generating materials and activities, centrall7ing on-site vehicular traffic routes, and locating potential dust -generating equipment in areas of the least impact; b) Providing an adequate water source at the site prior to start-up of construction activities; 0 t-andscapmg and providing rapid covering of bare areas. including slopes, starting from the initial grading phase; d) Minimizing airborne, visible fugitive dust from shoulders and access roads; e) Providing reasonable dust control measures during weekends, after hours, and prior to dally start -tip of construction act.Mfles; and fj Controlling airborne, visible fugitive dust from debris being hauled away from the project site. If you have questions about fugitive dust, please contact the Enforcement Section of the Clean Air Branch Clean Air Branch Indoor Radiological Health Branch (808) 586-4200 (808) 586-4700 cabg.doh_hawaii_ ov April I, 2019 September 13, 2021 S,tantec ConsutFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek {$QS) 494.2039 Clear Air Branch Hawaii State Department of Health Via email; c€ab�z,'doh.hawaii.gov RE Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, forth Kona District, Ha+wal'! Island To Whom it May Concern: Thank you for the corrinnent letter dated September 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses to your substantive comments below. Cpmam_ent 1: You must obtain an air pollution central permit from the Clean Air Branch and comply with all applicable conditions and requirements, You must control the generation of all airborne, visible fugitive dust. It rs recommended that a dust control mcriagernerit plan be developed which identifies tared mitigates oil activities that may generate airborne, visible fugitive dust. Construction activities rn)ust comply with the previsions of Hawaii Administrative Rules, § 1 1-60 1-33 on Fugitive Gust. Response 1: As described in Section 3.3.6 in the EA, the contractor for the deve!Npment would be required to prepare a dust control pion during construction cornpiiant with provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR), Chapter 11-60.1, "Air FoIlu ion Control," and Section 1 1-60.1-33, "Fugitive Dust." Comment 2: Includes construction or demotitian activities that involve asbestos. You must contact the Ashestos Abatement Office in the Indoor and Radiological Health Branch, Response 2: The project does not expect to encounter asbestos during construction, and no demolition is proposed. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. It you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email, Sincerely, Stante+c Consulting Services Inc. la.t,.' ice_ l r .Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mJchele.lefe12)at2 a'stgntec.go cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jcckson, County cat Ha ai'i Planning Department DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY * COUNTY CSF HAWAII STREET SUITE 20 • 6110. HAVVAI'I 96720 E 'a: 1 _,.BO50 - �}AX (B^8)1361-9657 5cl: wmb�h r 8- 20'-G %k- %lichtle I.eleh%re ,Stalitec C n5ullm- Services Inc. 1, 9 kloku Place Hilts- HI 96720 Dear %Is. Lefobvrc: SuhjeM Dv -LIft 1-n it"I,II m ental Iw,vssmen1 for 1Ro, ta] Vistai Himsing Project NortIt K+:t7.1 IOistrim Islam d of HHma Pi T.ik !lair 1% re 6-6021:016, 017, 018 anti 019 %Ve have re%ie�wedi the au�i ct Draft Environmental Asscssmcnt rL L1 ) and ha'4e tilt folkwLing Cr { t11TIML111.51 please b.- informed t114L thiz su'bje'ct p rccts are served h an sm-icc ftt has an allocation ot 4-51 L%T11I5 01'%VWCT. or un a% crugo to i t- of 180.400 ualign- Pr Jill . The develormenE wAl need to prv6de water a- adequatc pressure and WfUTne antler peak-tlo%% i -mi fire -flow k;onditions. Thi c -all kk21t`r Ll1.111and C:11L:ulations 11I+I1411 1�� �ublr7ittcd f0f rc� ielc . aS the r% Me? u;r taller thiel the l ILIM'li %. III t1cC;d ik, l in,aJ 6l 1. �Nhi%:]t - tioLLid Teducc the number trfd%%e]]ing unit Additional v%atcr bevun,i the: totLtl nm—nb—r ai allecaied -water U its to thy: ;tthtect "I: iii d 'Ile• t' AIIt .;A --',k ,'i. I' _'..,-: t• 'lltitlt \Ir k\ QLt!:1.1I!JIli; t}l•drur \i":twt RC'NowiL`es mid P1ann--[1' lir arc;-. al, ''k+1- 6 Sircerele wurs. W/---P Keith K. Okamoto. 1`11. �1.71t.��rer- `1T1�'1 Vin.«1 neer RC -di L, Ccopy - flail -n;,-`punt[ nt 7Mw„ 0e..:'71MI-M ^,P : 2!'L*t `."eC i �'!r 51-11 L3=j:`Jt:.. °! r7C.r mr-1 rt--tp Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec Consutfing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek 1$08I 494.2039 Mfr. Keith Okamoto, Mlancger-Chief Engineer Department of Water Supply 345 Kek6ana&a Street, Suite 20 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawal"t Island Dear Mr.Okamoto; Thank you for the comment letter dated September 8. 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Corr !Ment 1: Please be informed that the subject parcels are served by an existing service that has an allocation of 451 units of water, or an average usage of 180,400 gallons per day. Response 1: The project would not exceed the onnoun# of wafer allocated by Department of Water Supply, Comment 2: The development will need to provide water at adequate pressure and volume under peak -flaw and fire -flow conditions. Response . Kona Three LLC would ensure that the development provides water ,~ t adequate pressure and volume to occupants under both peak -flow and fire - flow conditions. Comment 3: The overall water demand calculations should be submitted for review, as the water use other than the residential dwelling units will need to be included, which could reduce the number of dwelling units that can be developed, Additional water beyond the total number of olloc❑ted water units to the subject parcels is not available. Response 3; Kona] Three LLC would submit water demand calculations as part of Pian Approval. Additionally, as described in Section 3.3.3 of the EA, the project would rrinimize wetter demand by limiting landscaping and using xeriscape landscaping where landscaping is installed. The project slims to implement and balance xeriscape and providing safe and adequate recreational space for residents. The project would also utilize reclaimed or reuse water for landscaping If possible. September 13. 2021 A+ir. Keith Okamoto Page. 2 of 2 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at �808j 494-2089 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. u i -- Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department DAWC Y. ICE Zt GMVRW)II QF N WOO rX � w �III.Tia li�r STATE OF HAWAII RCPARTIN1"kT OF 1.AwV AND ti #T[ RA[. RESOURCES L.►ND DIVISION Stantec Consulting Services Inc Atter±ion: Ms. Michele Lefebvre Environmental. Scientist P.0. Box 191 Hilal Hawaii 96721 Clear Ms. Lefebvre. 14)sII4l11tt I1llXh_1 1ION IA li.1', I lAkk 111 )A� September 8. 2020 %1 11 5.3.1'. B f %1!. i H..�NYr.ra.MIW I111%414711ka114til IM III .W!il IN 14 11741311 +11.1• I l' NY t i l H wikiei 1iFI it 55 %-.I %11 0 aria emaili miCcele_lefebvreastaritec.Ccam SUBJECT: Draft Environmentai Assessment (DEA) and Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact (IFONSI;i far the Proposed loyal Vistas Housing Project located at North Kona, Island of Hawaii. T'h, K. (3) 7-6-021,016, 017, 018; and 019 on behalf of Kona Three LLC Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject, matter The Land Division of the Department of Land and Natural Resour s (DLNRI distributed or made available a copy of your request pertaining to the subject matter to DLNR's Divisions for their review and comments - At this time, enclosed are comments from the (al Engineering Division, (b) Division of Forestry & Wildlife, and (c) Land Division -Hawaii District on the subject matter Shculd YOU have any questions, please feel free to cantaut Darlene Nakamura at (1808) 587-0417 or email: darlene k nakarrura hawaii gov, Thank you Sincerely. RUSSOW Tst�i Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc. Central Files County of Hawaii (vdicdpi1e5) Attn: Planning Department (via email: plann.isla_a( __ha a_iicounty.Qov) DAVID Y. tOe a:t;vFRhM"`hiaF na�NAa FROM: __T-@_ 70 STALTE OF I1A WATI ni,.p I RTN I FNT 01 r ti%p %%1) ti t11 Iter Itr tial It6 I,, I x N 1i i } rx v -1f i% NF15I ! 'i I mt i i' rX e,2 NON01 1. 11 N'ti`„_aS9 IT441,'1 August 14, 2020 MEMORANDUM rrix�arsxSL}a 16. ?til L%'%&A All kb# i RAC KE50VJ{r E& 4f;5fN.l 15540V 41I&AEE'R RE5UL MUF SL.i.Vh f.E ME N L DLNR Agencies; —D!v of Ar_lualic RE15 +urCas Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR.ENGB@. waii Prov) X Div. of Forestry & Wildlife (rublrrosa.t.ter ra,,4W hawaii.gov3 Div of State Parks 5C Commission on Water Resource Management (DL_NR QWRMrc l lawaii.rlov) Office of Conservaiion & Coastal Lands X Lance Division – Hawaii District (gaidon_c het hawti+aiigov) -R-Historic Preservation (01 -NIR- Intake. SF{RD&hawaii aov) _ffteFussell Y. Tsuji, Land Administrator k'ussd{! Tsuji SUBJECT Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) and Anticipated Finding of No Significant Impact (f=C)NSI! for the Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project LOCATION, North Kona, Island of Hawaii ThIK (3) 7-6-021 016. 017, 018.. and 019 APPLICANT; Stantec Consulting on behalf of Kona Three LLC Transmitted for your reviow "Ind conlmei7t is wforwatitin ur, 1,u;, above-relerenced subject matter. Plcasesubmitany car,iments by September 7, 2020. The DEA carr be found on -rine & fN(a I opa!; h bavv�rrr t, ,� ';�n � n. (Clh* - rp The Envarranrnenfa! Nolide io 1he middle of the pager) If no response is received by the ab€ave date. we will assurne your agency has nc comments. Should you have any questions about this request, please contact Darlene Nal€amura at darlerle,k.rlakarrlLlrl ha ail.gov. Thank you. Attachments cc: Central Files tdditiLlIlal ( p 1Ne have nobaechons. (J ) We have nvicomments.. j Currents are attached Signed Ad:�2 Print blame' ["arty S Chang.. CNet Engineer Divisinn- Engineering Division Dale A, ip 19, 2010 TO, DLNR Agencies; _Div. of Aquatic Rc;scurces Div. of Boalhng & Ocean Rcc,(ealion }( Engineenng Division (DLNR t_NQR@hawaii acv) X.Div, of Forestry & Wildlife (tubyrosa.t.terraga haiWa i.�cov) _Div. of State Parks „,Commission on Nater Resource Management (dLNR-CWRM2hawaAo,goy) —Office of Conservation &E Coastal Lands X Land Division – Hawaii District �UO.rQ ❑n c hblft–ahawaii gcvl 7C Historic Preservation (DLNR. Intake SHPDtIEDhavian g❑v) FROM; Russelt Y. Tsuji, Land Adminishalor Russeg Tstyr SUBJECT: Draft Lnvir❑nmental Assessment (DEA) and Anticipated Finding of No Significant impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Royal Vistas HousingPro«ject LOCATION. North Kana, Island of Hawaii_. TMK; (3) 7-"21:016, 017, 018, and 019 APPLICANT- Stantec Consulting on behalf of Kona Three LLC Transmitted fat your review and comment is information on the at3cx.� retereno��ri :�ihjout matter. Please submit any comments by .September 7, 2020. The DEA can be found on -lure at 141.2 -Ilheatrf; hiliivii gov/beac/ (crick on The EQyiryrtmentad N+atrce ire the rrridclie of idre Rage J If rm response is received by the above date. we will assume your agency has no comments. Should yeu have any questions about this request, please contact. Darlene Nakamura atdarlene.k.nakaiiiura.[a�hawaii.gnv. Thanky❑u. ( We have no objr cftns. ( } e have no comments. U } Comments are ai;ached Signed, Print Blame, DAVID G. SMITH Administrator Division, Forestry and Wildlife n_ Date, Sep 4, 2020 Attachments cc° Central Files dAVID Y E�iE �*'. 5dwlr t � E15:k11:f:.`.15.ti �.IVEnra.JR 1]- �Ltr'ya:i w $GhYLLr J4 1. Y�L+.1sU � 1 I t H �I Ei}: ti'f11171t E'!i �'i {'iExlti4[4g1!}ti a+x til +1'1'R I: E'lvtlEaf: k; a STATE OF HAVY,+ U 01,L11[�.ktC��,ltk-ttli_ti�S011I; IFS LAND 01AISION PUS T OF F ICE BOX 6-11 I K -)N .1LL"LLa. FLAWAll 46V -W August 14, 2020 TO, DLNR Agencies; _Div. of Aquatic Rc;scurces Div. of Boalhng & Ocean Rcc,(ealion }( Engineenng Division (DLNR t_NQR@hawaii acv) X.Div, of Forestry & Wildlife (tubyrosa.t.terraga haiWa i.�cov) _Div. of State Parks „,Commission on Nater Resource Management (dLNR-CWRM2hawaAo,goy) —Office of Conservation &E Coastal Lands X Land Division – Hawaii District �UO.rQ ❑n c hblft–ahawaii gcvl 7C Historic Preservation (DLNR. Intake SHPDtIEDhavian g❑v) FROM; Russelt Y. Tsuji, Land Adminishalor Russeg Tstyr SUBJECT: Draft Lnvir❑nmental Assessment (DEA) and Anticipated Finding of No Significant impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Royal Vistas HousingPro«ject LOCATION. North Kana, Island of Hawaii_. TMK; (3) 7-"21:016, 017, 018, and 019 APPLICANT- Stantec Consulting on behalf of Kona Three LLC Transmitted fat your review and comment is information on the at3cx.� retereno��ri :�ihjout matter. Please submit any comments by .September 7, 2020. The DEA can be found on -lure at 141.2 -Ilheatrf; hiliivii gov/beac/ (crick on The EQyiryrtmentad N+atrce ire the rrridclie of idre Rage J If rm response is received by the above date. we will assume your agency has no comments. Should yeu have any questions about this request, please contact. Darlene Nakamura atdarlene.k.nakaiiiura.[a�hawaii.gnv. Thanky❑u. ( We have no objr cftns. ( } e have no comments. U } Comments are ai;ached Signed, Print Blame, DAVID G. SMITH Administrator Division, Forestry and Wildlife n_ Date, Sep 4, 2020 Attachments cc° Central Files D 11'1® 1 . 7G.E 4 RfA4VwY. MEMORANDUM N, r,1L`M"r or 11AW til DI=pArt111I ".. ill 1 V,0 s''.I I'. 'i i I P%, Pi 01 I y,r I, ISl4ltildr,.�� r ,.. •a��, -,!:`LolB�r �, 11.11 PI ',I I' Idi.ltr(�ISII if,lil�.1'n�,w1.� - Scptemlivr -1 -W'11 TO: RI ISSl-I I. Y. TS1J.11, A din inistratrar k1f1 l DIV .Iwrl,n FROM: DAVID G. SMITH. Adlrinistratar, l 56 Divi: ioit of'rorestly and �Vildlile %L LA I.14 11 i, AM r II °Ap�i Fl+. dl '.11.i'. •r ,Id'F:. •.:?I:".i. L4hi µ. ..iaIrM1 Ill WTK yl MIA 1 11,1 r r: r r I I'I'rir rir 5+'511 T 4R'I.•'1. IIfA, .i. I FI I LIr FP Irl4 r +•rl I k. '^s4 II! III ��il I ill+','rr nil L� } rd C'.. l.IJ M: .Y L,rI l r:.551 r 1 I • rel• I f:r.Il.ii11111 e I,. ,�� ;...,IIF': 4i1•. �N Lv.r ju o. ? 7t) d SUBJECT: Division of Fore try -mid W ildlifLL t J1ltttMentj fair the Drat Enw•irolinietttal Asscssmcnt (l LAl and ..11111il),tt12d Finding ofNo sitinilwont Impact (F'ONSI) For the Proposed Roy 'Il Vimas IIIFusinLr 1,r1,jcVt. Hie OL-1,,L1imentvI'LandAndNattlral 010 N1 1.11�r� iD()E AW) has 1A:ckCd %I,ur intluir}regarding the IN ' .u111 a1i ,ix',ts:11 4l i-ONS1 Ofthc kos ;d Vistas t10LIli l:' Fr,jcct in North Kona on Ila%wai i I,I.i d- 1 (3) 7-6-021 oI+,, 1.117, U18, ()I L). Illi proposcd prc)jcct consislr Of Lip to 450 multi-farnily teSIIJ V rltl;ll units in cItI,,icrq I,I- 1111 :and threc-story hujldings 1111 yilxpl'w iffliately 70 acres of prcviousfl► rritdw1 w 141pod l.ar111. i lic'Aali listed Hawaiian Hawlkor °Ir (ittrl['lr I,. 1,114mil IkFociclll' ill the (11't►ject �icilhll�. 1 A )l %\ rcc4'1n1111VI1d. sun"cyinV tltc arca III ensure no l lay.,niian 1 -W, -k nests are prc lcnt il'trccs arc to be l:llt, `its hest plight he present during llic hrccLlitlld sL'a on from March to S pternber. The State listed Hawaiian I'loary Leat or'Ope`ape'a (Lcr„cinruscvru'rcrns Vefflollis) has the potential W tillcrlr in tine vicinity OF 1114: Ilrcllcct a co .inti inn) roost in tira,rh\ tr%`cs. 111'any site clearinv is Ncluirctl lltis :should be tinted 1t1 avoid distr.irlx,Al,C during the hat birthing and Pup rcarin; sew,4.m (.lt,rlC I 11.1101.1jall Sellien113er 15). Wthis cLmri.a 11L' :1, IlikkA, woody plani, greater than 15 feel (4.6 meters) tall should not be dislurkicJ_ FC3111 ° i11. ortrir1t11,ec1 swithoul consulting DOYAW. The lisTed Dlawkburn.�, Sphinx LMotlt Affilrrthi 1 WdIL'011111r I liras a hisloric range that cn4 4.,anl�rl.s.ti, 1114_• projVcl rr::1. Larvae 111 W,%T :cLA on ntlan\ nonnail%c hostplants that include tree tnhacco (.'trLl,rrt�sl4r s 1M1+rrL tt x�lllch gr,kk , irl disturbed soil. iyv recommend C011tartin�l' l.nlr I°Ia wai`i islandD01'A\V;fl iIL-L':1tiS1 RP0!-14?'01for lurtherinformLitionabout vhtre13S1%4may bepresent :�Ild whether ve el<Yus,Il tir�'c� tI1{,aI J IN: conducted to dcicnninc the presence of plants preferred h. BSM. To ,n.iitl 111rm I 1 W%I. D()[ AW' r4&kNFnnriLnds rimio ring plants less than cane meter in height or Burin, Illtr dr� tinter of ik e ll'�VU rCilloVe trL% iobtacco o►icr one wcicr in height or disturh the grt7tlrtrl �11'Olintl car 5.1 illtin si vera] meters ofthese plants dlek n�tasl lxe X11 kctl tltc}r+attgitly i'or the presence of a'i;gs and 1.irt :sc. DO FAW mcor inwnds minimizing the tr ox,cmem of plan! or sail material bevrvtcn w,wksites. such as in Fill. Soil atnd plattt material may contain iiwasive Fungal patliogenw fe , 1',gj1�1 '�_rlii`a Death). vcrtebrite and rnveltcbrate pests ic.g, I ittle: 1-44: Anls. COCOatut Ithijh,, :ros Hccltc�). or invasive pl3nt party that COUld harm our native species and ccos, iiia is, We recommend consul[iil�; the Big Island Invasive Species C'onlmitace w (808) 933.3340 :1a planning. design. lld Lk1l)wl2`ri6;tion of the project W learn 01' ctny }sigh -risk iww,as w � ,;peeLies in the area and %%a),; in ralirl_,:llc spread, All equipment. rnalerials, and personnel should ho cleaned ofc-,cess soil and J,:kh l m rlliniralize the rise of spreading invasive slwcies. DOFAW r"orramcndS trxing nativc Ilam species for IaendscapiuL, [last NrC rJIl,rrai+rl,Ntr: fir [lie aron (i.e. clinnatr conditinns are suitable icr rlle planes to thrive, laisturictall� occ` urrcd thea . etc.). Pleasc do not plarlt inversive species. DOFAW rocummends consulting flee Ila%N ai-i-Pacific Vied Risk Assessment website to determine the potential invasiveness of plants proposed for use in the project{lyttltis:lr+tiil�'s. Tca4� c,r4,ra,+till `r�wt� � irtwlwr *;se tirr ti.arl hiri�r+�°I. 'A,'c recilr>I' nwnd that you refer Lo ;Irtr[IL ,1I w.tlr � filr gtrrdanve on sclectlon and evalvation for landscaping plants. Vr o nate dial artilirial li Sling cern adversely impraci scobirds that runt pass through the arra at nl'lll ISN' c:iaus'iilt 111',6cilkill"11 I hi, tlrsoriemara els can result in collisi all %%ilh manmade artifacts Or Lrcatertding, 01" l I'Ll., h1l' 11'0_1Irtlinnl hI.JilinL that nught be required. DUFAW rca:c "imcnds that all lights be fully shielded u, nlimi pas. Nighttimcc wit ret iliac requires outdoor lighting should be avoided during dit: seabird ticdgin� season from Septewber 15 through Member 15. This is the peri(Kl WhQn Voting ccarinirdi lake their maiden waw uc ko the open sca. Foi- illustrations and guidance related tri seabird-I-rlcndly light styles that also prcrlect the dark. starry skies of !- uwai'i pleLrae visit: lrtI ov. It I\%ar l a oyl'vw i Id I i 1'ey tale!,;2(11610.11DOC439.rKil". We alppreciatk: ',' aur erfllurls to work w% i th our office for the conservation of our native species. Should lllc so;l,e nfthe prgpect change signi#ic,antly. orshc uId it hccornc apparent that tilrctttenc4l a l CI1d,11agCr4(I SpCCICS MASI bC 1n1f13Clyd, plicae contact our staff as som as possible. If you Irate any gtww ,tions, please contact i..aur,sn Taylor. k'rrlleL:r!%: Habitat Conservation Plkl irmig ( ourdinator al (808) 587-0010 or Ial: , t:t% I.- r 1%iv, MEMOMMOIJ TO DLNR Agencies: —Div. of Aquatic Resources —Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR.g R e hawaii.gov) X Div, of Forestry & Wildlile (rubvrosa t.terra9g havjaii-naYy Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management 1�.CV PM a hawaii pov) Office of Conservation & 0castal Lands X Land Division ._ Hawaii District�(Ics ohes; �h w ii ave X Historic Presenraiion DLNR F1take SHIPD� iawaii.goy) Rbf� ry."il FROM: Russell Y. Tsu]i, Land Administrator w SUBJECT' Graft Environmental Assessment (DEA) ,aW A,n4idpatecd Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Royal 'vistas Housing Project LOCATION- North Iona, Island of Hawaii, TMK: (3) 7-"211-01166. 017, 018. and 019 APPLICANT. Stantec Consulting on behalf of Kana Three LLC Transmilted for your review and cornment is ir•,formation on the above -referenced subject matter Please submit any comments by September 7{ 2020. The £]EA can be found on -life at: hl!Llli _earth hoi-fair govloeccl(CliCk on Env+rvrrmental Nptkv In the middle of the page,) [f no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions 2bout this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at dariene•k.nakamura hawaii.aoly. Thank you. ( j e have no objections. ( e have no cornments ( ) Comment$ are ,anached• Skgned- �. _ � m Priv" Name: - Dale Attachments ac= Cent.rai Files �I�.,yoCJ Y -1[1E r�. •■sr �r EI•+S URp 'Y7wEWvtaY C,'.P ttiYyA,l� Al.:S iu:! UI L-:t4u 4ti11 till k541 144-`.411'49 F f� 5 �., i.i:k��: �:. tips• N s I [h I,r�ls 1. ML k �J' V 5'.k tlk V k �.r, ".04 J} STATE OF f A%k ,alt bEPARTtir�hTil L:Sltip rititl iti;+l.l9'�twr fiESL?l''RfF IAN II Ii 05MN POST OFFICE IKA 63 IIe3e.OIAIt 11, IlhYlAIr % August 14, 2020 MEMOMMOIJ TO DLNR Agencies: —Div. of Aquatic Resources —Div. of Boating & Ocean Recreation X Engineering Division (DLNR.g R e hawaii.gov) X Div, of Forestry & Wildlile (rubvrosa t.terra9g havjaii-naYy Div. of State Parks X Commission on Water Resource Management 1�.CV PM a hawaii pov) Office of Conservation & 0castal Lands X Land Division ._ Hawaii District�(Ics ohes; �h w ii ave X Historic Presenraiion DLNR F1take SHIPD� iawaii.goy) Rbf� ry."il FROM: Russell Y. Tsu]i, Land Administrator w SUBJECT' Graft Environmental Assessment (DEA) ,aW A,n4idpatecd Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Royal 'vistas Housing Project LOCATION- North Iona, Island of Hawaii, TMK: (3) 7-"211-01166. 017, 018. and 019 APPLICANT. Stantec Consulting on behalf of Kana Three LLC Transmilted for your review and cornment is ir•,formation on the above -referenced subject matter Please submit any comments by September 7{ 2020. The £]EA can be found on -life at: hl!Llli _earth hoi-fair govloeccl(CliCk on Env+rvrrmental Nptkv In the middle of the page,) [f no response is received by the above date, we will assume your agency has no comments. Should you have any questions 2bout this request, please contact Darlene Nakamura at dariene•k.nakamura hawaii.aoly. Thank you. ( j e have no objections. ( e have no cornments ( ) Comment$ are ,anached• Skgned- �. _ � m Priv" Name: - Dale Attachments ac= Cent.rai Files September 1.3, 2021 S,tantec ConsutFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Box 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tel: 1$081 494.2039 Mr, David Smith, Administrator Department of Land and Natural Resources, Division ^f Forestry and Wildlife 1 151 punchbowl Street. Room 32.5 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas dousing Project, North Kona District, Hawal'i Island Dear Mr, Srnith►: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 4, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The State listed Hawaiian Hawk or `lo (Suteo sofffarivs) is known to occur in the project vicinity, Division of Forestry and Kidlife �DOFAW) recommends surveying the area to ensure no Hawaiian Hawk nests are present if trees are to be cut. "Ica nests might be present during the breeding season from March to September. Response 11: The EA includes protection measures to avoid impacts to Hawaiian hawk nests. As stoted in Section 3.3.4 cf the EA, if construction for the project is scheduled to occur in the Hawaiian hawks breeding season (between March 1 and September 30), o qualified biologist would conduct a pre-disturbCnce survey for hawk nests within and immediately adjacent to the property. If a Hawaiian hawk nest is located durang the pre- disturbance nest survey, no lana clearing or construction should occur within 1,600 feet of ony active Hawaiian hawk nest during the breeding season until the young have fledged (usually October). Regardless of time of year, Kona Three LLC would coordinate with the DOFAW prior to trirmrning or cutting trees with Hawaiian hawk nests, as nests may be re -used during consecutive breeding seasons. Comment 2: The State listed Hawaiian Hoary Bat or 'Ope'ape'a (Lasfurus cinereas semotus) has the potential to occur in the vicinity of the project area and may roost in nearby trees. If any site clearing is required this should be timed to avoid disturbance during the bat birthing and pup rearing season t.fune 1 through September 15]. If this cannot be avoided, woody plants greater than 15 feet (4.6 meters) tall should not be disturbed, removed , or trimmed without consulting DOFAW, Response 2: As stetted in Section 3.3.4 of the EA, to minimize impacts to hoary bats during construction, woody plants taller than 15 feet would not be rerncaved or trimmed during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (tune 1 through September 15). Additionally, Hciwaiian hoary bats farads for lnsecofs from as law 1 111611 September 13, 2+021 Mr. DovId Srr ilh Page. 2 of 4 as 3 feet to higher than 300 feet above the ground and can became entangled in barbed wire, if used for fencing. The proposed project would not use bcirbed wire for fencing. Comment : The State listed Blackburn's Sphinx Math (BSM; Mcnduca blcackbumi) has a historic range that encompasses the project area, Larvae of BSM feed on many nonnative hostplonts that include tree tobacco (NicoN ana glauco) which grows in disturbed soil. To avoid harm to BSM, DOFAW recommends removing plants less than one meter in height or during the dry time of the year. If you remove tree tobacco over one meter in height or disturb the ground around or within several meters of these plants they must be checked thoroughly for the presence of eggs and larvae. Response 3: A biologist surveyed the project site and did not find the species present, and did not find potential habitat. As stated in Secfion 3.3.4 of the EA, to prevent potential imposts to the Biackburn"s sphinx moth, the project would include the following protection measures. A biologist familiar with the species would survey for Blackburn's sphinx moth and its larval host plants (tree tobacco and native ' aiea) between November and April or several weeks after o significant rain and within four to six weeks prior to construction. Surveys should include searches for eggs, larvae, and signs of larval feeding (Chewed sterns, frcass, or leaf damage). If maths or native 'aiea or tree tobacco over three feet are found during the survey, Kano Three would coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service �USFWS) for guidance to avoid impacts. If no Blackburn's sphinx moth, 'aiea, or tree tobacco are found during pre - disturbance surveys. Kona Three LLC would ensure that measures are taken to avoid attraction of Blackburn's sphinx moth and prohibit tree tobacco frorn entering the site. Tree tobacco con grow more than three feet in approximately six weeks, and above three feet in height the tree tobacco can become a host plant for Blackburn's sphinx moth. The proposed project would remove tree tobacco less than three feet tall and monitor the Project Site for new tree tabacco grown before, during, sand after project constructic-7. Mor1cring for tree tobacco after construction, can be completed by any staff, such. "❑r maintenance crew, provided with pictures of tree tobacco at different -e stages. Comment 4: DOFAW recommends minimizing the movement of plant or soil material between worksites, such as in fill. Sail and plant materiol may contain invasive fungal patnagens (e.g. Rapid 'Ohi'a Death), vertebrate and invertebrate pests (e.g. Little Fire Ants, Cocoanut Rhinoceros Beetles), or invasive plant parts that could harm our native species and ecosystems. We recommend consulting the Big Island Invasive Species Committee in planning, design, and construcflon of the project to learn of any high-risk inv❑sive species in the area and ways to mitigate spread. All equipment, materials, and personnel should be cleaned of excess soil and debris to minimize the risk of spreading invasive species. 1 111611 September 13, 2+021 Mr. DovId Srr ilh Page. 3 of 4 RespQnse: To minimize the introduction and spread of invasive species, Section 3.3.4 of the EA states that "where no grading or grubbing is required, existing vegetation would be left in place. Biosecurity protocols during construction would include clearing and inspection of construction equipment for invasive species (includincg insects, frogs, rafts, and mice), and world be applied as applicable." Text has been added to the EA to state. 'The developer would also request current recommendations from Big Island Invasive Species Committee (1311SC) at the time of developrnent." Comment S. DOFAW recommends using native plant species for landscaping that are appropriate for the area (i.e, climate conditions are suitable for the plants to thrive, historically occurred there, etc.). Please do not plant invasive species. DOFAW recommends consulting the Hawaii. Pacific Weed Risk Assessment website to determine the potential invasiveness of plants proposed for use in the project. Response 5: Also, to rninin-ize the spread of introduced species, no invasive species would be planted and Section 3.3.4 of the EA states "a mix of native species, Polynesian introduced species, and ran -invasive introduced ornamentals would be used in landscaping for the Project Site and an invasive weed control plan for the Project Site would be developed to minimize impacts from fire -prone, non-native vegetation species.'' Comment 6: 5/ie nate that ortificiCai lighting can adversely impocf seabirds that may pass t Trough the area cit night by causing disorientation. This disorientation can result in collision with manmade artifacts or grounding of birds, For nighttime lighting that might be required, DOFAW recommends that all lights be fully shieldea: to minimize impacts. Nighttime work that requires outdoor lighting should be avoiaed during the seabird fledging season from September 15 through December 15. This is the period when young seabirds take their maiden voyage to the open sea. Response 6: To prevent irr►pacts to seabirds from lighting, as stated in Sanction 3.3.4 of the EA, the project "would not involve any unshielded fighting for either construction or operation, in conformance with Haa ai`i County Code § 14 - 50 et seq, which would avoid impacts to nocturnally flying Hawaiian petrels and Newell's shearwaters. Additionally, during operation that site would use lighting only where and when it is needed for safety purposes. The use of outdoor lamps with warmer calors (less blue light] and anergy efficient fixtures would be considered when the building is being constructed. To minimize Project impeacts from lighting, the following text has beer added to Section 3.3.4, "Subject to laical rules and regulatlons, that Proposed Project would utilize lighting on the 270 degrees Kelvin scale,`. If the proposed project incorporates additional outdoor lighting, it may attract threatened and endangered Hawaiian seabirds, which may become disoriented by the lighting, resulting in birds being downed. To avoid the potential downing of these threatened and endangered seabirds due to interaction with outdoor lighting, no construction using unshielded equIprnent 1 11111611 September 13, 2+021 Mr. Davld Srxrilh P cue 4 of 4 maintenance fighting .should be permitted after dark between the months of April and October. Ail additional permanent lighting should conform to the Hawai"i County Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (Hawai'i County Code Chapter 9. Article 14), which requires shielding of exterior lights so as to lower the arnbient glare caused by unshielded lighting. The proposed project would also avoid nighttime construction during the seabird fledging period, September 15 through December 15." We sincerely cappreclote your review of the document. If you have any additionol comments or questions about the EA, please contract me at (808) 494-2039 or by erncail. Sincerely, Starner Consulting Services Inc. r Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii planning Department From hikson. Mafia To; Lerebwre Michele Subject: FI^A, Kona Three LLC Prot (Royal Vstas) Dwtvo Thursday, September 10r 2020 7:59;00 AM FYI - From: Martin Chan <martyohan[u)hibr,ne?> Seat. Wednesday, September 09, 2020 2:37 PM To: Jackson, Maija--Maija.Jackson@hawaii(:<:kaiity.gov> Cc: "Martin Ohan` <martyohan[a hibr.n€ t> Subject- FW: Kana Three LLC Project jRoyai V star) Hello Maija, Well that was quite a long, and detailed EA for the Royal Vistas Project. Some of my objections to this project roving forward as outlined in the EA are as follows, This is primarily a single family neighborhood/area. The current Zoning and Densiky PFopcsed is not a good fit and creates a suffocating impact on the existing road system. The vehicle access points forth is project will clog an already stressed Road system or grid and unduly impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Much has changed since the original 1984 zoning designation. would suggest that a down Zcning be initiated to RS -15 or R5-30 from the current multifamily zoning. The work farce concept at this location is not feasible based on the proposed high rental values. The Vacation Rental concept, with the proposed higher density, will add an unknown higher volume of trip generations to this region. A safety and quality of life concern. The required affordable housing, development has not been funded or finalized which is a Requirement for this Royal Vistas or krona Three, LLC project mooring forward in any capacity. This designated land is adjacent to the Kilchar)a Subdivision, et al with a very extensive drainage problern with no known Developers or Builders under contract at this time that I am aware of. Let me know if I am mi-sstating any of the facts I may also add other EA concerns in a future email. I am opposed to this Project being granted approval by the Hawaii County Planning Department/Commission or the Hawaii County Council. Mahalo and Aloha, Martin M, Chan/'ice President Kuakini Makal Homeowners Assoclation From. Martin Ohan [mal to1martyphan.9a hibr.ma Sent: Monday, August 03, 2020 12:37 PM To: 'Jackson, Maija' Cc: 'Mark Hast` Subject: RE; Kona Three LLC Project (Royal Vistas) Help Maija, Mahalo plenty for the update with the Kona Vistas Project. Does this EA mention the affordable housing proposal or plans adjacent to the Kuakini Makai subdivision? Name change from Ted Baldau to Mark Hoist, President HOA. Sarre address. Take care. Aloha, Martin M. Dhan From: Jackson, Maija[[nailto,Maija.]acksaminha44ilcaunty,opyJ Seat: Monday, August 03, 202D 11:43 AM To: Martin Ohan Subject: Kona Three LLC Project (Royal Vistas) Hi Marty, I just wanted to let you know that the draft Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Royal Vistas Housing Project will be available for a 30 -day public review and comment period starting August 8th. To view the draft EA go to the Fallowing website an of after August 8th: I'ittr�:lluea�J,c�e�l,J�av,.aii.�:�vi layr�etsll!�lstart,a�rax�If7cac_ I.�r�ylParr��slAllltc��'i�.asux A hard copy of the draft EA is also being sent to the Kana Planning Office. 1 also asked the consultant for the applicant to send a copy to the Kuakini Makai Association. I believe she is sending it to Ted Baldao at PO Box 2924, Kailua Kona since Ted is listed as the registered agent. If that is not the correct contact info for the association please let me know. I look forward to hearing from you. ftidoila Jot-ksor?, Planner County of Howaii Planning Department X808) 961-8159 September 13, 2021 Stantec Consulting Services lnc. P.O. Bax 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tel: (SOS) 494-2039 Mr. Martin Ohon. Vice President Kuakinl Makai Homeowners r�ssocicition Via email: mortyohon.«;hibr.net RE: Commenfs on Draft Environmental Assessment and An#icipated FQNS1 for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Iona District, Hawrai`i Island Dear Mr. Chan: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 9, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: This is primarily a single family neighborhood/area. The current Zoning and [density proposed is not a good fit and creates a suffocating impact on the existing road system. The vehicle access points for this project will clog an already stressed road system or grid and unduly impact the adjacent neighborhoods. Much has changed since the original 1984 zoning designation. I would suggest that a down Zoning be initiated to RS -15 or RS -.50 from the current multifamily zoning. Responsel, The proposed action being considered in the EA is the proposed development project within the current zor3ing. The project is consistent with medium density zoning and conforms to the guiding principles regarding urban growth patterns as defined by the Kona Community Development Plan (COP). The applicant is not proposing any change in zoning for the development, so the EA dries not analyze any change in zeroing. Comment 2: The work farce concept at this location is not feasible based on the proposed high rental values. Response 2: The need for the project has been identified by a private developer based on demands for mid -market, including workforce housing in the area. Comment 3: The Vacation Rental concept, with the proposed higher density, will add an unknown higher volume of trip generations to this region. A safety and quality of life concern. Response 3: The first phase of development has been identified as long-term rental, but the exact nature of the rental units has not yet been determined. The traffic analysis in Section 3.7.2 of the EA conservatively accounts for occupancy of all the units, and daily trips are not expected to be different whether the rentals are short-term or long-term. h F September 13, 2021 Mr. Martin Chan Page. 2 of 2 Comment 4: The required affordable housing development has not been funded or finalized which is a Requirement for this Royal Vistas or Kana Three, LLC project mooring forward in any capacity. Response 4: As described in Sections 1.2 and 3.2 of the EA, the affordable housing development is required as part of the origins z:)6ng ordinance. The EA states, "Subject to approval by the OHCD, Kana -;_ir= === s cJ liate which owns the 12 acres would deed the parol to the County or heir nominee to satisfy a portion of the affordable housing development requirement, and the homes would be, built by qualified offordable housing developers." The Final EA identifies options for the affordable housing project if this parcel is not selected. Finally, the approval of this project is not dependent on the completion of the affordable housing project which would be bbilt by a qualified affordable housing ,;,ev loper. Comment 5: This designated land is adjacent to the Kilchcana Subdivision, et cal with [a very extensive drainage problem with no known Developers or Builders under contract of this time that I cm ownre of. Response 5: The flooding that occurs across Kucakini Highway is described in Section 3.3.2 of the EA. As described in this section, the sheet flooding occurs as a result of a lack of infrastructure on the highway. The applicant recognizes this existing condition and as described ira the EA, is working with Hawaii County's Department of Public Works to correct these issues. As discussed in the EA, the project would not contribute or exacerbate the flooding issues. Per Section 27-20 of the Hawaii County Code, the project is not allowed to increase any run-off onto neighboring properties, so there are no effects can any neighbors from project run-off including an the County -awned parcels. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any cadditionol comments or que5tions about the EA. please contact me at (808} 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvret:stantoc.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawcai'i Planning Department Stantec Consulting Services Inc, Attention: Ms. Michele Lefebvre Environmental Scientist P.O. Box 191 Hilo, Hawaii 96721 Dear Ms, Lefebvre September 17. 2020 ,iI:ZAN\E U. CANE CRAIRPF"IN IWA 1W 01 LUND.L\ 6.lA I L SUL REKK RCLS Ur AlMINSI(ti 11N FL #TFH UFMIg7RUF NIANACE.N ENT via email: michi _6fc k�ar+Ccs#antec,rom SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) and Anticipated rindir g, of Nu Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project located at North Kona, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 7-6-021;0161, 017, 018, and 019 on behalf of Kona Three LLC Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. In addition to our previous comments dated September 8, 2020, enclosed are comments from the Commission on Water Resource Management on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (806) 687-4417 or ernail: darlene.k.nakamura cgr. hawaii.gov, Thank you, Sincerely, RC1SSell T-5jr Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Flies County of Hawaii (wfcoples) Attn.- Planning Department (via email; plannirlQahawa4count11.goy) O ■ �# DAVID Y. IAM OOVERNOR(0 HAWAII h✓� �,., qa .. � CRY�S.*► y STATE OF HAWA.11 DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES LANA D11171 MON POST 0TF1C F BOX tit 1 110NOLLILLI, IIAWo`,AII 96 16q Stantec Consulting Services Inc, Attention: Ms. Michele Lefebvre Environmental Scientist P.O. Box 191 Hilo, Hawaii 96721 Dear Ms, Lefebvre September 17. 2020 ,iI:ZAN\E U. CANE CRAIRPF"IN IWA 1W 01 LUND.L\ 6.lA I L SUL REKK RCLS Ur AlMINSI(ti 11N FL #TFH UFMIg7RUF NIANACE.N ENT via email: michi _6fc k�ar+Ccs#antec,rom SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) and Anticipated rindir g, of Nu Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project located at North Kona, Island of Hawaii; TMK: (3) 7-6-021;0161, 017, 018, and 019 on behalf of Kona Three LLC Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the subject matter. In addition to our previous comments dated September 8, 2020, enclosed are comments from the Commission on Water Resource Management on the subject matter. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact Darlene Nakamura at (806) 687-4417 or ernail: darlene.k.nakamura cgr. hawaii.gov, Thank you, Sincerely, RC1SSell T-5jr Russell Y. Tsuji Land Administrator Enclosures cc: Central Flies County of Hawaii (wfcoples) Attn.- Planning Department (via email; plannirlQahawa4count11.goy) September 14, 2120 REF: RFD.5288.8 TO: Mr. Russell Tsuji_ Administrator Land Division FROM: M_ Kaleo Manuel, Deputy Director Ccmmission on Water Resource Management SUBJECT: Draft Enviromental Assessment (DEA) and Anticipated Finding of No Sigr7ificant Impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project FILE NO-: RFO.5288.8 TMK NO.; (3) 7-6-021:016. (3) 7-&021.017, (3) 7-6-1321:018, (3) 7-6-021:019 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. The Commission on Walter Resource Management (CWRM) is the agency responsible for administering the State Water Code (Code). Under the Code. all waters of the State are held in trust for the benefit of the citizens of the State, therefore all water use is subject to legally protected water rights. CWRM stoncgly promotes the efficient use of Hawaii's water resources through conservati:j•r ri e8sures and appropriate FC-SOUrce management, For more information, please refer to the State Water Codr:. Chapter 1740. Hawaii Revised Statutes, and Hawaii Adrninistralive Rules. Chapters 13-167 to 13-171. These dOCLJmF7ts are avallable v0 rhe Internet 7C httn_}idInr.hawaii,novlcwrm_ ')I;, r.: ,7n Fnts 'elatedto water resources are checked Oft below. 1 _ We recommend coordination with ttte county to incorporate this project into the county's Water Use and Development Plan. Please contact the respective Planning Department and)or Department of Water Supply for further information. 2. We recommend coordination with the Engineering Division of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources to incorporate this project into the State Water Projects Pian. C3. We recommend coordination with the Hawaii i)apartment of Agricuiture (HE)OA) to incorporate the reclassification of agricultural zoned land and the redistribution of agricaultural reaources into the State's Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan (AWUDP), Please contact the HDOA For more i nfoiTnat ion. L''J 4. We recommend that water efficient fixtures be installed and water efficient practices implemented throughout the devetopment to reduce the Increased demand on tite area's freshwater resources. Reducing the water usage of a home or building may earn credit towards Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEER) certification, More information on LEEIJ certification is available at http:flwwvw,usgbc,oryrleeef. A listing of fixtures certified by the EAP as having high water efficiency can be found at http:l ww.epa.govlwatersense. 5. We recomrnarrd the use of best management practices (BMP) for stormwaler management to minimize the impact of 1P project to the existing area's hydrology white maintaining on-site infiltration and preventing polluted runoff from storm events. Stormwater management BMPs may earn credit toward LEED certification. More information on stormwater SMPs can be found at http_1;pIanning.hawaii_goviczrr initiativesllow-impact-developrnentl 6. We recorilmend the use of alternative water sources. wherever practicable - 7 We recornmend participating in the Hawaii Green Business Program, that assists and recognizes businesses that strive to operate in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. The program description can be found online at http_Penergy.haws! i_gov}grearo-business-program. I__i 8. We recommend adopting landscape irrigation conservation best management practices endorsed by the Landscape Industry Council of Nawar. These practices can be found online at OAVID Y. ICE p+r f` A r�'mxree nr r�xJJw ���t,�' s SUZANNE EI CASE ri71P�PEPS,JW d' � BRUCE S. ANDERSON, FH.D. KAMANA MAMER, PH 0, yr MICHAEL G. SUCK NE L J. H AANAHiS WA.YNE K XATAYAMA PAUL J MEYER STATE OF HAWAII M DEKnKALa EC'CR L 6EPL�v LYWEC?U]R VEP,49TMENT{)P LANE) AND NATURAL REWURCE$ COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT P:D aoxui HONOLULU, HAWAII 96EG4 September 14, 2120 REF: RFD.5288.8 TO: Mr. Russell Tsuji_ Administrator Land Division FROM: M_ Kaleo Manuel, Deputy Director Ccmmission on Water Resource Management SUBJECT: Draft Enviromental Assessment (DEA) and Anticipated Finding of No Sigr7ificant Impact (FONSI) for the Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project FILE NO-: RFO.5288.8 TMK NO.; (3) 7-6-021:016. (3) 7-&021.017, (3) 7-6-1321:018, (3) 7-6-021:019 Thank you for the opportunity to review the subject document. The Commission on Walter Resource Management (CWRM) is the agency responsible for administering the State Water Code (Code). Under the Code. all waters of the State are held in trust for the benefit of the citizens of the State, therefore all water use is subject to legally protected water rights. CWRM stoncgly promotes the efficient use of Hawaii's water resources through conservati:j•r ri e8sures and appropriate FC-SOUrce management, For more information, please refer to the State Water Codr:. Chapter 1740. Hawaii Revised Statutes, and Hawaii Adrninistralive Rules. Chapters 13-167 to 13-171. These dOCLJmF7ts are avallable v0 rhe Internet 7C httn_}idInr.hawaii,novlcwrm_ ')I;, r.: ,7n Fnts 'elatedto water resources are checked Oft below. 1 _ We recommend coordination with ttte county to incorporate this project into the county's Water Use and Development Plan. Please contact the respective Planning Department and)or Department of Water Supply for further information. 2. We recommend coordination with the Engineering Division of the State Department of Land and Natural Resources to incorporate this project into the State Water Projects Pian. C3. We recommend coordination with the Hawaii i)apartment of Agricuiture (HE)OA) to incorporate the reclassification of agricultural zoned land and the redistribution of agricaultural reaources into the State's Agricultural Water Use and Development Plan (AWUDP), Please contact the HDOA For more i nfoiTnat ion. L''J 4. We recommend that water efficient fixtures be installed and water efficient practices implemented throughout the devetopment to reduce the Increased demand on tite area's freshwater resources. Reducing the water usage of a home or building may earn credit towards Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEER) certification, More information on LEEIJ certification is available at http:flwwvw,usgbc,oryrleeef. A listing of fixtures certified by the EAP as having high water efficiency can be found at http:l ww.epa.govlwatersense. 5. We recomrnarrd the use of best management practices (BMP) for stormwaler management to minimize the impact of 1P project to the existing area's hydrology white maintaining on-site infiltration and preventing polluted runoff from storm events. Stormwater management BMPs may earn credit toward LEED certification. More information on stormwater SMPs can be found at http_1;pIanning.hawaii_goviczrr initiativesllow-impact-developrnentl 6. We recorilmend the use of alternative water sources. wherever practicable - 7 We recornmend participating in the Hawaii Green Business Program, that assists and recognizes businesses that strive to operate in an environmentally and socially responsible manner. The program description can be found online at http_Penergy.haws! i_gov}grearo-business-program. I__i 8. We recommend adopting landscape irrigation conservation best management practices endorsed by the Landscape Industry Council of Nawar. These practices can be found online at Mr. Russell Tsuji (Page 2 September 14, 2020 http:�)www.hawaiiscape_courtwp-content/uploadsQD'3iO41LICH_IrEgeticn_Corfservadori SMPs.pdf. ❑ 9. There maybe the potential for ground or surface wr ilor ciot)radation/contamination and recommend that approvals for this project be conditioned upon a rev ,�.v I -,s -1-a State Department of Health and the developer's acceptance of any resuit,ng requirements related tr; water quality. ❑ 10 The proposed water supply source for the project is locatod in a designated water m,anagemenI area, and e Water Use Permit is required prior to use of water. The Water Use Permit may be conditioned on the requirement to use dual tine water supply systems for new industrial and commercial developments_ 11 A Well Construction Permit(s) is (are) are required before the commencement of any well construction work. ❑ 12 A Pump Installatlon Permit(s) is (are) required befere ground water is dave[eped as a source of supply for the project, 13 There is (are) well(s) located on or adjacent to this project If wells are not planned to be used and will be affected by any new constrriction, they must be properly abandoned and sealed. A permit for welt abandonment must be obtained. ❑ 14 Orourd-water withdrawlals from this project may affect streaniflows. wihich may require aro instrearn flow standard amendment- F1 mendment_Q 15 A Stream Channel Alteration Permits) is (are) required before any alteration can be made to the bed - and/or banks of a steam channel, ❑ 16 A Stream Diversion Works Permit(s) is (are) requ re4:: heiore ar,y stream diversion works is constructed or altered. ❑ 17 A Petition to Amend the Interim Instream Flow Standard is r12'r.1uired fur any new or expanded diversions) of surface water. ❑ 18 The planned source of water for this project has not been identi it -d in this report. Therefore, we cannot determine what permits or petitions are required from our office, or whether there ars potential impacts to water resources. ❑ OTHERS If you have any questions_ please contact Lenore Ohye of the Corn missbri staff at 587-0216, Septerr'ibei 1.3, 2021 S,tantec Consutiing Servkes Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek f$08) 494.2039 Mr. Kalea Manuel. deputy Director Commisslcn on Water RescL rce Management P.O. Box 621 Honolulu, HI 96809 RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawsal`i Island Dear Thank you for the comment letter dated September 14, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment EDEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: We recommend coordination with the county to incorporate this project into the county's Water Use and Development Pian, Please contact the respective Plorining Depadrnent and/or Department of Water Supply forfurther information. Response 1: The water units have already been acquired for the project. Additionally, Kona Three LLC would coordinate with the county regarding the Wa+er Use cnd Development Plan, as it applies to the project. Comment 2: We recommend that water efficient fixtures be 'installed and water efficient practices implemented throughout the development to reduce the increased demand on the area's freshwater resources. Response 2= As described in Sections 3.3.3 and 3.3.4 of the EA. the project would include water efficient fixtures and provide water -saving recommended measures for residents. Commerrit 3: We recommend the use of best management practices (BMP) for storrYlwater manogement to minimize the impact of the project to the existing area's hydrology while maintaining on-site infiltration and preventing polluted runoff from storm events. Response 3: Prior' to the initiation of construction for the proposed project, Kona Three LLV would ensure that a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit is in place as described in Scotian 3.3.3 of the EA. The permit would recuire best management practices (13MPsj to minimize erosion and for storrnw❑ter pollutian prevention. Oversight of the BMPs would be conducted weekly for the duration of consfructior, with updates and corrective actions documented and transmitted to the State Department of Health, Clean Water Bronch, September 13, 2021 A+ir. Kaleo Manuel Page 2 cif 2 Comment 4: vve recornn-)en-d the .ase of alternative wo. e- sources, wherever practicable. lR,.soor s.e 4: No alternative sources of water have been identified for the project since 451 water units have already been allocated for the project. We sincerely appreciate your review of the docurnent. If you have any additional comments or questions about the PA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Sfant+ec Consulting Services Inc. f, Michele Lefebvre. Ph.D. michele.lefebvre! stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, lona Three LLC Marjo Jackson, County of Howo'I'i Planning Department Harn Xim A i.." u., August 18, 2020 1s. Michele Lefebvre, PhD Environmental Scientist Stantec Consulting Inc, PO Box 191 Hilo, Hawaii 95721 Dear Ms. Lefebvre: c _ Paul K. Ferreira - 1r`adfcr C'h�rf Kenneth BUSAd0, Jr. County of Hawai'i POLICE DEPART IFNT CUB) 935.331 I 't LLx o ki+J$ 961.21810 SUBJECT: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (DEA) AND AN7TCTPAT-- - ° GOF NO SIGNIFICANT WPACT (FONSI) FOR ROYAL VISTAS HOUSING Fr--., i ._.: , ISLAND OF HAWAII, NORTH KONA DISTRICT, TMK.S: (3 ) 7-6-021,016, 7-b l 2`i:017, 7-6-021.:018, AND ?-15-021:019 This is in response tc your letter receiver on August 10, 2028, requesting comments related to your pi-cject. Thank y"i for allowing the Hawaii Police Department the opportun4 to participate. At tis time, the Hawaii Polite Department has no comments.. Should you have ijuestions, please contact Captain Gilbert Gaspar Jr., Commander of the Kona District, at 326-464-0, extersion 299_ Sincerely, PAUL K. FERREIRA PC)LICE CHIEF r .. n � ' ROBERT WlAGii�I�R ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF AREA II OPERATIONS GC f jaj 19riQ 210 cc: Planning Department -Haua+°i CDLIR* is an Equmd Opporamm Provdcr arW Eraploycr September 1.3, 2021 5-tantec ConsutFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 95721 Tek J808) 494.2039 Mr. Robert Wagner, Assistant Police Chief - Arae ll Operations County of Hawaii Police Department 849 Kc_ipi'olcrni Street Hila. 1 i 196720 RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawal"i Island Dear Mr. Wagner, Thank you for the letter dated August 18, 2020, in which you stated that the Hawaii Police Department had no comments ort the Environmental Assessment. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document, If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me of ($0) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stanfec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. rni hele.lefebvrestantec.corr� cc! Richard Wheelock, Kana Three LLC Maija Jackson, County at Hawaii Planning Department HArry Y+� Roy Takemoto md"O'ertrN iliix JOI Se pternber 22, 21020 Michele I.efe1wre Ql,o unti) of lu al 4 HAWAII FIRE DEPARTMENT 'i Nidur2[111 r Fliki, If:rmai`iW.7211 {K111} NIH, .1,a-L(Alk9-)2-29211 141 is lt� l �_ I,<f�}a�• re r� s1a11tec_c0rtt tantec Consulting 1110. F.U_ Box 191 Hila, Hawaii 96721 Dear Ms, Michele Lefebvre- SL'RJF'CT- Draft Environmental Assessment ko-,nl Visins Housing, Project North Eona. lffawai°i TMK, 7-6-021:0 M, 7-6-021:017, 7-6-0.21:018, 7-6-021,019 Darren J. Rosario 1''e- f h..; Robert R.K. Perreira 11ey-wi Fite f 7rirj. In n2z rds to the arc►e-nne_ntioned Fnvirontnental AssLssmem application, the Following ;hall be in accordance_ NTPA 1, 1AIF'O1iAI FIRE CODE, 2006 EDITION Xbtc,- f ke" I. -Of 'I Stale Fire Cade, 'Valiancti Fi7t, Tro rccrjo,I i A, ssoac hXIOP ?O(Y? IVI jr-W, T 171-17 Cel 11 OA! Uf ,H(rft ai V C'ol nfY ainendrnc+nty ore r,.lc.'J1!!fied wNt rxpreced)rix -C Of i/rc r(.fiQ'€anv(, vo,k Chapter 1 S Fire 1)gartwetit Access and, Water Supply 18.1 Cenera1. Fire. dcpartmont ace s oriel water suppIic;� shall comp with this cUpter- For occupancies of an especially hazardous nature. t-rr,vhere special hazards exist in addiTioan to the normal hwrd QFThe occtip ancy, or where access fer fire apparatus is unduly difficult. or areas where there is an inadequate fire 110u', ur inadeclttate Fire hydrant spacing, and the AH.1 may require additiotlal safegUards irrc-lclL-1111 :, bcfl 1101 limited lo, additional fire appliance w6ts, More thaii one type of appliance, or special systein& suitable for the protection of the hazard involved_ 18.1.1 Plans_ Il..etw`4 i'rtwv 11 im Lllav! i Irl 411ijak rl! f'r v' !'r ii.,rf.i 5tantec Consultiniz Inc-, September 212, 20` 1) Pairc 2 I8.1.1.1 Fired Apparntus Accaess. Plans fDr fire apparatus access roads sKrill be submitted to rhe fire department for review as cl approval prior tea construction. 18.1.1.2 Fire Rydrant Syvents. Plans aild speciticzt-tins for fire hy'dranit systems shall be suhniitted to the fire (,Iep€,rtment for review and a.pf)ro%,aI prier to const rLICU On_ C— 1$.1.1.2.1 Fire Wdranat use and ReWications. No to iauthoriaed person shall use or operate ,my Fire hVdr&11l orale°tss such person first seuutes perrinssion or a peralut from Lhe Dwner or reprtsentative oC the department, or company that owris or gnyern4 that water supply aPr-wstcm. Exception; Fire Department persomiel c:onductilag ficetightlag operatloas, hydrant testing, and/or mainTenanGc, and the flu -shiny and R(rgtance of hydrants x itncsscd by Fire Prcvcnthi ,n BurcaU per' olnnc1. 18.2 Fire Department Aces. 18.2.1 Fire department access and fire deparinrent access roads shall he provided and maintained itu accordance with See lion 18.2_ 1,8.2.2* Access to StrctCtures or Areas. 18.2.2.1 Access B#jx(es). The AHJ shall have the authority tc) r-equlrC an acceC s box(M) to he itlstalled in an accessible locatioa where access to or within a structure or area is difficult bccausc of security. 18.2.2.2 Access to Gated Subdivisions or Developments. T`he AHJ ,[,all lhwra the awhors`ty to require fire department access be provided to gated subd_1651oats ror developments through the use of an approved device or system. 18.2.2.3 Access Maintenance;. The Owner cwoeeupattt &fa struc.tureor area, wit11 required fire department :access as specified iii 18 2.2.1 or 18.2.2.2, shall rotifv the AHJ when the access is inodifi.ed in a manner that could pre,, nt fire depattmertt access. 18.2.3 Fire Departnierlt Access Reads (' may he rtfrrred a,; FDAR) 181.3.1 Required Access. 18.2.3.1.1 Approved fire department accers Toads shall tie provided for every facility, buisldinT, or portic- rt of a building hereafler ccaaisMCWd lar rclocaw4 1#3.2.3.1.2 Fire Department. Access roads shnll consist. of roadways, fire lanes, parking lots lanes, or a conibination thereof. Stantec Consultine inc. Stptember 2, '?�)`Il Pagc 3 18.2.3.1.3* When not more thalt two one- antl two-famIIi - dl veIIings or privare garages, carports. sheds, agricultural buildings, and detached buildings or ?rucrures 400ft' (37 nr2) or less are presem.:he requiremelxLs of 15.2.3.1 through I S.2.3, 2 , I sha l l lie per nfitted w be meds lied by the AHJ. T 8.2.3. 1 A W heri fire departn;ent access roads cannot be installed due to location on property, toped raphy, waterways_ nonnegotiable grades, or other similar conditi-ms, the AH u shall be authorized to require adrlirional lite piotecuon features 18.2.3.2 Access to Building. 18.2.3.2.1 A lire dcpartrnellt access road shLA d2uon€1 t<) ,.vit"tin irr 54 t't (15 m) nfat least one exterior door that can lie opened ti -rim t.la outside ;Ir;t!, ides access to the interior d the budding. Exception; I ai-id 2 sMgle-fainIIy dwelling=s. When buildings are protected throughour with an approved automaric sprinkler system that is, installed M accordance with NEPA 13., NEPA 133- or NHA 13R -,the disiance ill shall be permitted to be increased to 3100 feet. 18.2.3.2.2 Fire departunelrt access roads shall be provided such that ;uty pati m of tine facility; or ally poi -tion of an exterior NVAI or the first Story of r.hr hurldill" is located not more than 150 it 146 m) from fire department access roads as measured by an appr&ved route around tht exterior of the bilIIdFnL^ c,r facrllty- 18.2.3.2.2.1 wkm billildinms are protected throughout with an apprt-)ved automatic sprirldei s} -steal that is installcd in accordance ),vith NFPA 13, NFPA 13 D, or NEPA 13R, the distance in 15,1-1,2.2 shall be germ€tied to be increased to 450 It W# 7 til). 18.2.3.3 Multiple ,Access Roads. More than orie lire department access road wall be provided - Alert it is determined b-. the :AHJ that access bwr a single road could be impaired by Vehicle congestion, condition ofterrain_ eIimadc conditieus, or other factors that could, liintit ace wss. 18.2,3.4 81 ificntiolls. ,46,13.4.1 Dimcnsions. C;- 11.3.3.4,1.1 FDAR shall have an unobstructed m idth of not less th„ri '2011 with an apprCived turn around area if the PDAR excecds 15C feet. Exception: iDAR for one and twi's fin fly dwell jigs shall have art unobstrtwted u idth w�f tiot less than l5 feei, with ala area o#`ttot less thars 20 feet Ovide mdmk I Yl feet of the structure being pretested. lin approve -d turn ammid area sliall be provided if the FDAR exceeds 250 reet. C.'— 18.2.3.4.1.2 MAR shal l have an uiioL struc-ted vertical clearance of not less tlteit 13ft 6 in. S=_amec Consulting Inc. Sivember 22, 2020 Page C--18.2.3.4.1.2,1 Vertical clearances may be increased or reduced by the ,A11J. provided such increase or reduction does nor impair access by the fire apparaws.. and approved signs are IIisTaIIed {and maaIma-1ned indicatIIig Stich appreved ch, In ges. 18.2.3.4.1.2,2 V"ertical clearances shall be increased when vertical clearances or widths are not adequate to accommodate fire apparatus. 18.2.:3.4.2 Surface. Fire department acce<;s ruads and hrid-es shall be designed and aiaintain,ed to support the Imposed loads ( 25 Tmis) of the fire apparatus. Sueb FDAR and shall be c.ornprised of an all-weathcr driving- wrfacc, 18.2.3.4.3'1 urning Radius. C-118.2.3.4.3.1 Fire department access roads shall have a mjnim~ l m ins de twidi g radius of 30 feet. and a ininirriaun outsidc turning radius of 60 feet, 18.2.3.4.3.2 Turns in fire depart ineiu access road shall maitatain the mininaaam road tin-idtla, 18.2.3.4.4 ❑earl Lnds_ Dead-end fire depart_nient acces-, roads gra excess of 150 ft 146 111) ill leng-th shall be provided with approved provisions fear the fire apparatu% to turn aioultcl 18,2.3.4.5 13rid-es. 18,1.3.4.5.1 When a bridge os required to lie used .as part of a tar a depart nient access road, it sh aI I be constructed and maintained in accordance with county requiremen%. I8 g 3,d. 2 The bridge shall be deslSned for a live lead sui ricient to cane the impc wd loads of fire ap p6arat us - 18,2.3,4 53 Vehicle load linaits shall be pasted at both entrances to bridges where required by the AHJ. 18.2.3.4.6 Grade, C--- 1'8.2.:3.4.6.1 The rraximurn gradicIIt of a FIYL, dL�, partmrnnt acceio: road shall not rxccod 12 percent [Or unpaved surfaces :ind 1 ; percent for paved sup faces. In areas of the Fran R where a Fire apparatus Nvould c€ erect Lo a Fire hydrant or Fire Department Connection, the maximum grad ietit of'such area(s) shall net exceed 10 percent, 18.2.3.4.6.2* flte arl�.le ol' a pproaeh inial departure for any means L�f fire dephtrt�t>rem access goad $ball net ext end l ft drop ill 20 fa: 10.3 ni drop irl a in) or the design lintititiorts of the fire appmmas oFthe lite department, and shall be subject to appro�aI by the A.HJ, 5tantec Consulting lnc_ SuFtemher 22, 2020 Paze 5 18.2.3,+1,6.3 Fire depar i-ric at access ioatds coilinealnia Io roadwa'vs shall be pr(widled with CLirb Cuts extendilrg at least 2 ft (0 61 In) heyenid each edge of the fire lalre_ 18.2.3.4.7 Traffic Calming Devices. The desig>i _-.ltd use of traffic calming devices shall be apprOv J rlte AHj _ 18.2.3. E 141(ark1 g of Tire Apparatus access Road. 18.2.3.5.1 Where req ilirc€1 by the AHJ, approvcA yign5 or r.xthcr appruvod n(Aiuo-s shtlll he provided and maiaitained to iclearify fire department acus roads or to prohibit the Cs stfuction thereof of bath, 18.2.3.5.2 A rnarked fire apparatus :access road ;hail also he known a�' a fire lane. 18,2.4* Obstructic,n and Control of Fire Department Access Road, General. 18.2.4.1.1 The required width of a fire department access read shall alot be obstructed in arty manner, including by the parking of vehicles, 18.".4.1.2 Mlill Inklrn retlurred xvidths and clearances estzibllshed tinder 18. Z.3.4 shell he nialrltaliled at all times. 18,2.4.1,3* FaclWles and structures shall be maintained in a inanner that does rut impair or impede accessibility for lire department operations. 18,2,4.1.4 Entrances to fire departments access roads that have been closed wwilh gates and barriers in atcwndance with 18.2.4.2.1 shall not be obstnrcted by parked vehicles. 18.2.4.2 Closure of A,ccessways. 18,2.4.2.1 The AHJ shall he authoriz.cd to require Me inslaflation and maintcnancr nfgatcs rrr other a1)proved barric.9des a uoss roads, trails, orotl er accessways not inelLid inj�17 1)Aic streets, alleVS, or highWays. 18,2.4.2.2 %%-,here required, dates and barricades shall be secured in an approved rt-krtrnner, 18.2.4.2.3 loads, trails, alid ether access ways thAt lrrx:e been closed and ob;,ructed itt the inatriner prescribed by 131.4,2,1 shall not be trespassed upon or used unless authorized by the owiaer and the A.HJ, stantec Consulting 1nc- 4uptemher 22, 2020 Paze G 18.2,4.2,4 Public orficers acting, within their supe of duty shall be permitted cc access restricred property identi5ed in 1824 2.1 18.2.42,5 Lochs, pies, doors, barricades. chants, enclosures, sigus, tags, or seals that have been installed by the lire department or bN- its order or under its contr€A shall not he removed, unlocked, destroved, tamper-exl with, Or otherwise vandalized in any manner. 18.3 Water Supplies And Fire Hydrants 18.3,1 x A w aer supply approved lay the county, capahle of stipplying) they required lire flow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities or buildings, or portions thereof, are hereafter constructed, or utoved itita Of Withitt the county. When any portion of the facility or bwldin- is in excess of 130 feet 145 720rnstay frolic a w{iter supply on a ti re apparattrs access road, as measured by ait approved route around the exterior of the facility Or bill ldirigr on- site Fire hydrants and imins capable ofzupplying the required Tire flow shall be provided when required by the AHJ- For en -site fire hydrant requirements see section 18-3-3. F4CFPTIONIS: 1- When fac_ilitl,s or buildings, or Porti etas thure��f, are coatpletcly protected with an atppro (A aUT011-tatic fire 3pr1rtW r 5ystcni the prpvis ons (WscctiQn 18.3_ I may be modified by the AHJ. 2, When %-ater supply requirements cannoi be installed due to topography; or other conditions, the . TIT may require additinal tyre prat tion as specified in secticn 18,3,2 as amended iu the code. °hell there ,ire not more thattY twt°o dwvellings, or two private garage, carport, slieds and agric.uliural Occupancies, the recluirertlettt5 Of sectiOU I8-3-1 may be irtodified by AHJ. 18,3.2* Where no adequate or reliable water distribution spystenx exists, an raved reservoirs, pressure taii", elevated tanks, fire department tanker shuttles. or odder approved syste ns capable of providing the required lire lic)w shall he permitted 113,3.3* The JQeaiicii, noirubcr and rypc of fire hydrants cQnrrcctcd tri a wzTcr supply 44pz-blc of € elivering the rctluired Fire flow shall: he proviricd nn a fire agpr3ratus access maul on the situ of A premises or loth, iii Rcc:ordance w4°ith the apliropriat.e county water req uiremerns 18.3.4 Fire Hydr aLs and coalnections to tither approved nearer supphtel� shall be nccessiblc to the fire department, 18.3.5 Private water Supply Syslents shall be tested acrd niaintaitied in accordance ,k-ilIr Nl PA 25 orcQiauty requirements as dererniined by the :AHJ. 18.3.6 Where required by tltie AHJ, 1i re lrvdtarrts &Ltbject to vehicular damage shall be protected unless located urithin a JIUMic ri�'llt ofway- Struttec Coiisulting� Inc. Sel)tCnll et -', Pa6re 7 w 18.3.7"l -he AHI shall he notified whenever any fire trydrant is placed out of se",ice or returned to service. owners of private pro perty required to have hydraiits shall niainto in hydrant records of approval. testing- and maintenance, in aecordaixce with the respective county water letluireinews- t�eccrds shall be made ax-nilable for review by the AHJ rrpoii request - C— 18.3.8 11-iirnniurn water supply for boddings that do not meet the winimum County water 3 ar--dards: F u�lt'an .;a up to 2000 square Feet.. shall have a T11411mtirrr of 3.0(rp gallons of water availalale for lnirefi�htirr�. Buildings 2001- 3000 square feet.. shall have a mlrtirnLim ef6,600 j ;allons orware, available for hireli ,ltiting. Built.inzs, 3401- 6000 square feet- shall have a minitr Lim of 1?,000 LW]ons of water available for hreliv=hririg- Buildings, greater than 6000 square feet, shall meet the nYinlnlum County water aitd fire flow t �t�uir�.m�nCS_ 1 luItiple story btrildIn s shall TllulriplY the sgt);tre feel by the awountof stories "-lien deterrniriirrU, The n}ininium water supply. Commercial buildings requiring a winitrtum fire flow of2000g,lrnt per the DeparTment of Water standards shall double the rnirtinrunt seater supply reserved foo- tirefightiiiO Fire Departnie-it Cotir_ect[on s (FDC) to altemati-,e kvater supplies sh€ II cornpIy with 18.3.8 ( I (6) of lhiv codlc. NOTE: in thal wal-er calthment systems are being used as a trrealts of water supplY fGr i"irefi-#rtin-, such s-i'stetni shall meet the following requirements; I I i that a single vvater t{anli is ust-d r` ,r both d: westic and tirefi,,fit ing water, the water I& dornestiq use steal I n[rt be capaNQ of beilig drawn front the kvater rcwr�!ed for Ilirefightina; ) N1in1mtrm pipe diameter- si7es froom the water supply to the Fire Derhirtrnent G�jinection � 1- DC) �rs}hall be�/1asry' re ll -w s a) 44' for COM PVC VC pAen b) 4" for C906 Pty, pipe-, C) 3" for ductile Tr011; d1 3' fir agakanized steel. Strutter: Consulting Inc. pa' -'e 8 The Fire Depastnwnt C'crirtec;tion (1 -DC) shall z be nude of galvanized steel; b) ku`tve a gated valve with 2-P2 inch, National Standard Thread male fittin-, and cap, c) be located be(u•ee_j 8 ft acid 16 ft from the hire deparunei t access_ The location shell be apprxv td by the A HJ , d) not be located less thaa 24 inches, and no hither than, 36 itich,es FEoa) finish wzde, as mcasurcd from the rxntcr of the FD(' Qrificc; e) be 5ccurc rind capable of withstanding draping operaticnts. Engineered stamped pions mov be required; f) ]lot be located mare than 151) feet of the most remote part, but not less than 20 feet, Cf .he structure being protected: g) also) comely with secoon I: 4) F01' ClIle alld LWO lamAy dwellings, agricultural buitdinus, aad storage sheds greater thaii 2000square feet, buc less than _1000 scluare feet aud mcl is tk minimum Fire Department Ace ess R aJ requirements_ the distance to the Fire DepaErtmem C'o midis may be increased ro `00 feet Stantcc Consulting lnc_ September 2?, 202C Pa cte 9 5) For buildhi s with an approved automatic sprinkler system, the mirlinium water supply required may be modified - If there :ire ani• tluestions re,-ardin these requirement:,, please contact Deputy Fire Chief Rohert Perreira at (8U) 932-2902_ DARREN J. ROSAR1G Fire C'hicf RP; nac Fxnail; plan nin ii`(i'iiawaiicauntV s September 1.3, 2021 5tantec Consu113ng Services Inc. P.O. Box 191 Hilo, HI 46721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Mr. barren Rosario, Fire Chief County of Hawaii I ciwcri'i Fire Department 25 Aupuni Street Hilo, HI 96720 RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and .Anticipated fONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawcal`i Island Dear Mr. Rosario: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 22, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comment. Comment 1: The project should be in accordance with National Eire Protection Association [NFPA) 1, Uniform Fire Code, 2006 Edition. Response 1: The project would be compliant with all opplicable codes and standards of the NFPA 1, Uniform Eire Cade, 2000 Edition. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any adi ditionol comments or questions caleout the EA, please contact me at (808) 494"2039 or by ernail. Sincerely, Sfantec Consulfing Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre4stontec.corn cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hcawoi'i Planning Department Moll Ashle From: ARTHUR FELL{ <artfefix@verizon nat Sena. Wednesday. September 30, 2(J 20 3:10 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: Royat Vistds Dousing Project E-A Comments AtUchments: KV,Arch.A;'.pdf Please see my attached email which describes my OPPCSitia I t+) the Ruyaf ViSt7S HOvSirtg Project an the basis of arehL-0lagiCaI C.Dncerns Arthur M. Felix ].:6549 1, A r I I u R m Ef:t.i'l- jecure I I tem a res idaw 51'Kvi , Vist:1jdxIiwib:�w. Count'' res Il:wwa1,1. smv o Hawwal I. I 1 Faulx.S,Wd 1-a0 Jc%oi1k�Inncrtr rFij-ict1 that V thr sulftjmL oFIhe Iwcnr.li it OruO 1-nivirt>!nmcnIal ."cammt qut+minc-d b% Ro%al ti-4St15 HL'Usirlg PrOL:J;t T�t'V1.AP KC. `%ios, i 17-64)2 1 -116, 7-6- PI r-1 ;. 1 M}tx, rtr l 1-9-1111 I)tei hnrlh l:,I',:s 1}isl+l.l 1i![wartn'i'A,rwwl, w1c:w s■' 111411 Si'i Oros nsr Fersona11e as +.vcll as ui!ke Ay My Inrereit is real property 1 m5p'" %ithsn 250 tca;l rcliNi.ArICCI ., r 11rc h11'1fN"R--d 1Wk1 detrlupwlr.. I proiNt. III �mhtiapa.isivg, I have iirstl>wd krw,,61 die jfxhC fo1l.r,-inV tWt!.:"0 .-u .' alai'A,-PLlllt IrNtity llMr*r-J, .,IIMj min to ilk] s,> hzrwL M-Ov'4vo-1 ill i P- r;:i IM .1 ., �.4"1 gti',?1�', �ttarhir Gnts� I anti Mca:ilicl�tly waa itce96r:o: I" • r -w7v. iuI r: 7 h ah:cp Iopoll y. hi.lr„ib,41 r,Ahi�8 urr o , I:.,! t .:r: prescrll Ka,r,ad& 1hA1 am nul aJmjw I,,1Y n&ht%aW to the Draft 1 17w irorim,c^rr.Y! t .1 lam :3ttifrfhn'lhicprnrlct`%.4111lwa'- �1.isvo!rnd t:, .. t,LMNtItC"% urru. j; In sum, 44c i Tuft I•nviTummenrnl :wi,,WW?Ienl d'Kw 110( 11kCiIs, tiuffik icrtt fiWth arW aralyxis s{a+„ h Out !hc nmr-s,-.u, Inumi}tt* imrw3vem cm and divtxt iAm cm Ix undcrsi od- A p wp!, � r%imArrertaI R.' ge-gxm T9t ti'"Ttm Kati[ I'ji.U)It'gr'Jl 2{'eF Ml%!,� he ttlkk'n {*arr .,Pin 1111 fusom. Ai I uttdrr4tarwl �I, rsMu'11 eircam,.Itmclr3 xxwi�j IoA tt' u"'Aful ptttjm, segtt enialmin. rmoag ulhr r Cara es. h A bu, :. mf . ,.aF9 � � II appjjc,d,at kq d,: evptrrwE' grlltuwrtly IhtS lrmeieYl m I m -,I rictirre ss i ' -.on ply % kh nvcmnl,-Tl I rnotl,-- m- is imuffiviv!v Ma minte> urn. the I ky.i ft rnkmIrTrilmild I M U31 ifnpt,,vrmvw LL -L- mrimmd to tie m I C' 1_�: COUNfl JrJ I Mgt 'l.k SIM I W ILI Ilk I%. dlosc orm,:i]Is %1111 funalcel I J c ti In r � , i i i I c F p Cj j 11 % 0 f ! -,r r ": -,5 111;[11 the I [ i rv. V, L 1 , r 1 c- s. F M, C Anhur M. rrIN L 8 September 13, 20121 Stonte+c Consatting Services Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tel: (808) 494-20:39 Mr. Arthur Felix Via email: artfelix, verizon.net RE: Comments on Drainage Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FC NSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona district, Hawai`I Island Bear .Mr. Felix: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 30, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The steep topography, historical rapid storm titer run-off and associated dorroge present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the f rnft Env'ironrnentol Assessment. I am cwcre that this project will have serious impact on the immediate and surrounding area. Response 1: Kona Three LLC is not ❑ware of any damage to adjoining properties, including ween Kc€'ahumanu Highway, from water flowing from the subject property. Comment 2: The LEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood. A proper environmental assessment cannot leave meaningful details to be taken care of in the future. As I understand if, such circumstances would lead to unlawful project segmentation among other errors. Response 2: Section 1-2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the two County -oiled parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify that on TMK (3) 7-6-21:19, "Infrastructure during Phase II of the Proposed Project includes installation of a culvert system along with utilities and roadway across the ditch to extend Kekuanca`oa Street, which would then be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the Kona onnnrunty Development Plan (CDP) "Official Transportotion Map." For TMK (3) 7-6-21:18, the project includes infrastructure for channelizing ca portion of this ditch and includes a road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the CDP's "Official Trcnsporfation Map." Figure 2 has been revised in the Final EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages in the Project Area. Additionally, the text in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that Kona Three would prepare a Drcainnge Plan to ensure that development runoff would be September 13.2021 Mr. Arthur Felix. Page 2 of 2 contained onsite. The Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works (DPW). Text has been added in Section 3.3.2 of the Final EA to identify possible options for addressing the issues from existing flooding. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Comment 3: A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastructure will comply with government regulations is insufficient. Al a minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must be revised to show specifically what infrastructure improvements are required to tie into the County's drainage system and how those improvements will funcfion. Response : The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design of the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at a later date, the potential impacts from their construction are analyzed. We sincereiy appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre:--sta ntec.com cc; Richard Wheelock, Kana Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Deparimenr Mori, Ashle From. ARTHUR FFI_iX <a4rtfelixL9�iuerizore net= Sc►nt: Wmdresday, September 30, 2021 3.14 AttA To Plarning Internet Mail Subject Roy aI Vistas 1-iou541g Project EA Ccrnments Attachments: fCV Drain;AF.pdf Please see rry attached email wiich describes my opposition to the Royal Vistas Housing Project on tie basis of drainage concerns which concernsthe enure area around this project. Arthur M. Felix DLlL1_A"TIONOF ARHHslyN4 ik.tJN 1. f im d i-midm of KDry " r_,- „- ,iae _s,,e t'mu% uJ 11aAtul t, Slaw u liur*,al-1 T11e:.;XO[rr11rtl Ir, lid dc6 Elul-,awrrt pruyrcle.:7:lt t., 1 '' %1.--7k:Ci til kre PCItti4nk lJrkfs Lrrt't1c"wmtcriml 'Nsw-v,m(-nr a!1;tmit a h} kbval Vi.tra-q Ilou,Mng Nixijcct T&% Nfi- "icy Nm- k1.i 7 -C -021:016,7-b- 42 1:01 -C-U21:016,'_Q-021:01 T. -A-1") -111 11' t nkl 7-f-071 n115 North Xwo MT ;ri` . I +rrk,ttri lsl t.n�i. 5turr ,.l FIakv:1:' I jfrr.E.4 H -W per.mmaf§k fir vAl a; affects in% imerrs-[ in rcal prvpert} I rrsi& uathu) 21 rcL tjjt%1ajlccj of tltc prlip lv�t I.11Rt ptet,eet lit At1t'.h eapacirict. 1 hac fi.m tam! lrto w I Mge eC[bu; JOII4ruill V f-nt:. Wd cnt:ltl IVIJ wrjtlltl tt.Md-ti 1here Flo it miiled ulrtrl the ri, i kti. ' Ih;i4crckpc-%v.,dthrptraling11IA1`I C.NVIpfN1k^iF'tiTA1 As[ S' MFNTmW .utuwhmar;i-. 1 am'lryeciltc41h collzmecl about Ibc cttllursl irnpaw l411 tluag prsjcct I ,l, I _ ::,. m- Jra thug the ,kUdws olk-md it! !�iglpuc -it Lhe L1tuN 1 11%11eJ-:41 iC1.1h L�,-s,•w•i1, h"�`" AIC I+I<.11_.u9:.• i 1 win :,p,' a 11ititiIafllnl l i5 i 1i mmi -v *— Still the 11'Imd encu -m assedl b% h} suhATL Iurut rusrti . mol, 'k I the I{ttluuilLka UiJr, irlA�lwllLlV n+Cls %UJIN Jhai utt 111114-1V'44W1 rIt ,1rmvrIJ rt.l �v'rWIn ulIural Null, rn thr luthjwll'tt�iral wtuelis-. tIffmcd Lt ulfln,n ;el OW 1-h.: 110J1A1uu S11t�- s an M--, l�OAW I Lst+uiimat cultural and -mh'na,kb'iifLri-M It-mium i' -nm nri' �k •.:I�'^,i , r1t-tCt rh!'!1 r1mr„ n b,. rr•rl1, y.! 't .httH:1rd 1' 3- 1 rn; w0rtCC.M$ u[*':1 LX! rk-1]Ljli4srr a:zd anal„is jVri'Hru;:d bti Tm Pohaku ';ILIILL:, a crrP� ui-Asit:lt,a alr icitc-d 1 In :5ur`. by F,1._'= Fw zruazrmm.3!" ^.xu w m >^I :Ipv,; rim r} ;t'PI• .; -mf ctcn- wilt .uadl) t13 +-.IJt khat Elie 11111 iuU11 iia+�Ai,im ciAI!u-ui and aruham!Ir,.: il can he mdcrsttmd, Ir' ,lone P--operly prase., =: I. I. Al at mimmum- tine Ural, Lm -rkwLnl-CpUI AsscSn.i IL uiu�,; t t : c^ u;:-' Lp a+1 Uc&& Phl ` i -X is ,;.ito rrcovm �!ru:J rre�cvvaiion .ifihe! Hn€ilkiIca S1: de CLl r.nrnvnIj prvje:nl nin ChL' ;;l117.16'�L p�f'C�5 I .JLwlar; u deF o1 pole; Ujd the fi:rcju5 aj; is true. I7udc�i: JiJu.i-1�u131_ HBw.ei'I. S'g,EeijjtYrr 30- 2(,,20 r 2 Septerr'iber 1.3, 20121 S,tantec Consufing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek i$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Arthur Felix Via email: aOfeIix° 'vefton.net RE: Comments on Cultural Resource Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawaii Island Deoi Nor. Felix: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 30, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA] for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1; I do not consider that the archaeological studies in support of the DEA are adequate. I am aware that substantial evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject parcels includes features of the Holualoa Slide, including rock walls that are inadequately described as agricultural walls in the archaeological studies offered in support of the DEA. The Holucaloo Slide is can important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if damaged or destroyed. Response 1: As described in Section 3.6 and included in Appendix 5 of the EA, two Archaeolcgicol Inventory Surveys (AISs) were prepared for the pro�8ct. As part of the AIS. sites in the project area were documented and evcaluored for their significance. The AISs were conducted fallowing Hawaii Administrative Rules § 13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sites were considered significant under criterion d because of the information that was learned during the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs erasures that their information is not lost. The documentc: ion done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. Regarding the rack walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 2421 1) documented. This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of a h5lua. Also, the walls were l .0 meter in height and is similar in constructed to similar historic era rock wwolls constructed along historic -era roads: property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. The only rather parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3. walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walis are Located along the boundary of a Land Commission Award (LCA) #3660. Additionally, the western and of Feofure 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wvoll at the Q)� September 13, 2021 Mr, Arthur rellx Pope. 2 of 2 some gulch. It is unlikely that this is a holua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a holuca in the project site. Comment 2: I Base my concerns upon the evaluation performed by Torn Pohaku Stone,. ca copy of which is attached. The DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological features can be understood let alone properly preserved. The DEA must be revised to address the location, data recovery and preservation of the Holualoa Slide components present on the subject parcels. Response 2. In the email provided, there is reference to "the portion of the holuo cit the Holu❑ inn [that] hos rock walls cert both sides" and refers to parallel w❑lls within the proposed development area, possibly Site 31162 Feature 2 and Feature 3 walls which are LCA 43660 boundary walls. Primarily. Mr. Stone's email responses provide accurate information concerning the cultural importance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the near -coastal region between Koilua to the north and Kenuhau to the south. The remains of many of these complexes were first mapped by Henry Kekohuno. Mr. Stene correctly states the religious and social imparionce of he`eh6luo and its connection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures along the roost and in the near constol region. However, the complexes care located more than 1.Q km west of the project area and there are no remains of royal. sacred or sociopolitical complexes, or ca halua, 'within the project area. The existence of a hdlua within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Store. As discussed above, there is no documented oral Nsfory, archival documentation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a hbluta course existed within the project area. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you hove any additional comments or questions about the FA, please contact rile at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincere'y, Siantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mic,iele.lefeb,vre@stantec:.com CC' Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Molic Jackson, County of Ha ai'i Planning Department Mori, Ashley From. ARTHUR FELIX -rartfelix verizon.iet> Sent: W'edrwsday, September 30, 2020 11 " AIA To: Planning Internet t~,riail Subject= Royal Vistas Housing ProjeCt €A Curr rT-C-its Attachments� KV;Traffic;AF,pdf Please see my attached ernail which desuibes my apposition tc the Royal Visnas I louS r&g Project +7n the basis of traffif. concerns which well have a negative rmpact on the entre cernmurlily ArVvur M. Felix x.16522 DI_.[.'LARA TION N Ot dsk UJLIli :V� I. R"I I I U R N4 ITI.IA. dec19.rc I lur, a msi xi m of Iwasnvi t'r ua suhdrwtti ,air i, l.'OUFIE} It H;eulal'i. SWIT iii llawai i Il!rcfiuliceedland aicsc1upeircnI jru]e%'tthal sttllc subjc-- lo IfIc neivAng Drjti by Rovi,1 V I InuStng T'rVgLt I&%: 41aap K(!,y lLla_ IJ) -F 11''1:ill#,, "a•ri-al" 1-1)17. -143-021'0)I 8, and 7- h-I12I I1 Iii Kurth Kona Disinct. kaw'ai-i Island. Smie of Ha►ra1 'i of ccu me Iwmw�jil) as m-11 as aftLis m� intcmA in real prvperlp I rc a wi-buil 2-41 I'C Cii%d+stl�tlC+C� w me l7t<5plJ ed Iand dci, lkirino*ia propw In su4h capacities, I t,ai4v Flr,tlay.ias! kutmICAI F*a- IIt IIi4 roI a,t mti ,- !awv ;md :ouhl si rh1 -Gk, tmild 0.tirit therelo If called ulvIt t!e &) so I. I hs�Ix rrvI4tiy`^�1 Lii rwgi ,LaV L}ii.n1° I F IRI.INt4II-1�l".41. AS ME 'T' alr 9uiling rlre frutlra Inulaue! Ai..lik'4, Iac" by SSR1 Inianatim-1, ,"i: ped I i",. VN- Knit iiii-w1>krrl Utz ,AprH:iwlix 2 I the LA Ni'l i. `4VIEti7NME N'1'Al A"M i .aita wl �',lik°it,Ity ,!..)nccfrlCdabobYl A4'iT''w i'riF It'mFI44'l h,i 1lid 1tiII;Y n, :II.: t;,o;iy Vi,—I' MA40SEDi': iho� ark- ruga IuIIw a r .,..l,:ur::al1 ;iiillJoiwd in OW SSW Ir;ttf'tc InipaCt Arli %N13 KCFM 1 M711 ani! I.I_t -"'A V 1 'Alia: F[eport. arc discurised in the t uiv of the DRAFT I N, It! V,,M v 111 00, 1- -il,.M 1 'r°, I ,!i pli 548-56, f,? olid 71 1:1 it :'1 .,,i di%'igldnr the propiL,,:sed prajeci relies on the arse Ora IA:h-tJ1t'lwd r(radL%mx', L.Eflk t; ttt'o i ni" F t*° inna'mi Placo i,, vtr' qccp. I`,Ii-x Iim1t&,d SigW dtst,ur! es d x tea exurrim culves atul 19 n -my" w is i IAe udC"NCRs— Uk impact of irrrreawd trtilric srlsmg fionI P1 I I'tasw 3 buildotlts cif ti'!e Kpvarl V t k , Iicnviing I'miject is inadequaieh IilairCfis ��� S9P.! Trafi'c Irnp:ar;� 4ratAs!cRc c+n_,r,hict aeras,^airGssrn: :,r. Emn ? 1110n� I ,vit Ku, ~a am I h2ba-, I mm psrlicularl wnrarnuJ ;h:It aId<lin j ',jUMCrJuS Vll hv& rlTp> su ind fr.11rJ A !stWT111i %libdIS -,;[(I It tia I 1-r_7.L•I ,.arr•' ,-cl- -tlom Iv rrrqujej)Is aIone KekalMuCOR I'I,iV I LI,ri4&-f vhfil ahe irlanrunr_ [7ep rinkr-1-i '4Yalalial railvl,re° Ilie inpii4arrl iv.r jddrt-,�- 11tc'; o,mvtls- 4 noDILA3 l lr'�e;L;+-��r[l.ti.l �1 .ISSI �S�ilr'?.L'rtgluiresrvlrlugtl�not.=Ong rlaers. , A-,er w ,fvuvI kmj rM •r.s satt'J4 eta jxl�na!tur+r� hug} a.+air pit I.!1! f a�ab.'ie !aelfiril."k. Ch;i r 31-'r(70 1 -I I,. Ilakx :i4l Adminhimritc Rul'; IMIC,. aI r�" q►Jn r'ti Addressing rhe v mu+e,, ]u5i vvcr. 111,E 111d.AVI J "%VIRlln, I'rl AY%+ S!+I D-Nt 'l.Inplk j�TlOrvMlh arl, v::leas InilIF Itl,rl A;v jkl►er4e kCCLHlai.m tfwk; Is ar C,, Ix4.rni aurae Lix dcweltpjutwA would' uldi rv.• cxJ,141I,I!.. ;:._ . 'I f.. L1 IIJLMIde infill Jxr"rng. and it atul vmxv:wd Ix, rc-sulr in whislm' uj 1:fi11 �' 1.x(araI- r,.wL * Ifisaws!nn.-imi, omlo, RheI)P�XVI'VKlVIRiIN%II, I�%I *'.1F VT I ., I.I 1,hlr .,% IIk' 11LIIt"rIt& id Yti mr i,Inim LA,. all' ijicmaaNin ?he Sm ill' *01%,L.1�I._ _ 'I _ I w.i,6Iuie, like Ke.'kIlralid`mi Place. < 1 ° S}pt i,I V%%'Ik(I\h7F'�:1 AI �.��1 w4�Ilh� f al;aclm.We,II,!WC WtMff'le IITIfl11k (4 61r111i iit I)IC -.101 CM O "l-Ictim QIC I.lwIc t a Iluvr a Aub.sfanhul'Uth-ersegtW or ;reaiyidJ' �r e,iJlr. thn' Applvcanl clmrml "Ilhc l'roplrJscav# Itolcel WMRJ nell aftim puml, huldl Ir( ad , u.r., -: nvcr vwuld he :rppncnaaeh dkposcd of m drnirw.4 i .i...:. , I '. ,Mpm,t3_haxr v'•I ._ Ir1,- ,i s+"i=_1, _` rI In nrUjgS1 Ue°.5;4t1,•' Fmphxz,4:JatrW, •I'hIN hilt! rim I!!• 1not atldre-, - r? `.i.r I -r.` &mpatts as r•eiiuired by l'haptrr 11-21 KP I - I', ilL .kaki Wal irdstrul ve Rulcs. rs Ui,: pran nin,. P partes 4 �-Nwidn-i:;wct-rt 11, PRAF1 FNV1R(Y�\*`'%Cl',ht. ASS KSh•IL.NT`s ruhanx on the SS12AI Cnrfic Inlpwr1�WVi,u.. k%hi+:h Ire Lb�.- EdILj,,%,n� f iliirtiUasJinrs fiver tr,�r"•iti impac#,xvit it the Kuria W'stka3.ul,Ji+l,s��i, h Ilan: V ` r r ,aflit' Itupdel Ani{l s R elleln a ; a 6!ru%kih !;file of 1 °'a. m c11ri:_rusl the rlli ti� olr~tier ! n�lrrccr#nit, frarFi� l.nlpal tnulp;s �Cr}1'r�. ir�ti�13► -s"i `r: t: tilC+rr� is •e�. •v1i�'lltc 1. k�;,++.l la�tt; sii.rrl~t;#u1,IIliG';rl', 4"'rlCCl�i.'�I rCl�tlurl: e #�1� '�wl� �I I ��t�it Im1��7,:1 kr ,r. Idc marc rttxl .�.�.tti�ni?c rnUlli��:ncrztl..,n1fi K 1.61rl 1 li,lr Lli.r+ ,icrl vor!arttt7#i iii iIuwili' w%xrding ir, vv Jura mut Ucl,� uri lvcc-i inui LWvel#i�lc gips nttribtlabtc Ic, hwIi kwl Ili rI I. ; cl k" c SS M l rull'ie Jm t �111atpaix l�ep��r� 4mlxlsra - ,uo ur � 1�,,Ilr la,�ti • .1x ,4 4'i -141'1r 4•I•lP�'� xr!„14'le� ���4 �i,rllr}'y,tJrli��,�11tiYY� li.l�rtsi:a� li t I_'I 4• nli [t„ '-e''•�.r�• . I,^sem_ ,,w' qTrr:1 I+�, N) 11). ¢ wvtik,44w anti Aogw+t 4. Ii 11 ll,.,!:i1kLrlj.-. 7inp,ir%:,'..E;Ih uhc 111 It `,1 iuh4r k`*ixting l rufK JwpiwtArwltisi>m kcpxart w; idi •L•p. it i 11'. r le. !,•i MILL.!" I4 11HO 3 5.-1)1 &, bitAl1 113.- UtILlwal 1i luxe rvrwrnrr° I L' 1 .:I: Gs L I .v It - 1 r .!.%L rJr Q-4&. xu!lli I"i 1�rK d est"tltc +tSf 4 Trriti;r Irraplwt ,irsnl+°s'ru Rcp,,•t &II,% I RO "ehiclo'l r+ r hrwrlr ir1 frtft erre rYlrrtl5lxsl#rs,! 41w: �n l:tirlhirmtrrl.# iiE$wiiiL Ile 7 u m 7 ie dOLTu c m tititUrlTC 1� #119�t'C Y�4# slUUl7lew II'rC ai#.L�IAIJIrit til°`o +.It�d1H#11 {�1�-i�'Y.,Ii, .14�Cr�t`.'il I#t vJ#!;I"—t1�41ux mcam cnwfas and tilos txVC1i�b!c: s Ih.prrrs,mmi�nclnmm h,- y4F O Irti'iir ImT%ok1 Ah,5ly6R7.4irl too 7 r[#umt"lihout wfi 4-111C [.1 f;;,.t}sillta 1, u l ligbA,ix Arstl I I w3altli Rim-i1\or!111 h, ::Ilk 67:I,Iti �<11 lkilI1 1}art :..[Mc �lIPT,,!,r �hi�rtie°Cai;3i-°; ilk@i r-sy;c 5ti'i':TTtinl� �4Nt Ir:`iiN,��i' '.3i�41�1411i�� j a�ti�-o,l ,r��1'c a3fr:r+- I4[,1ftil.�:n: ,:ilTk 011'; Wr Mc v,zr1iTrCC9i: i f l retio�I n�itci:NricarT k,y i.SFhi 'C-arTc lrnpd41 Anul,.,*.% i4gk,11 for Timnitomg uk 31ie mieaswim of Vwtn i.;iahr[at ansa hlig,h+gin,. an:1 Kuck- it H 13�r!L, ,10 NRWT+{tTI Or MISWF n's,te [hall OTIC % iT-,.I... $n3 Gtua1 i1id Je,ien of a sign iJ Iu[hi Ill Ihl im.pe-d projmt. 7 IrN xu, i_ the I.rratt I`mt nynrneniuJ -%ss meni and wSFA7 f n33tiie lrrtl+n41 sir�ii1 wa , F{.T-�YI'4ri .�.i '.14�". a rCStiili A.N j�Tc°LC 1'.1, "rmjhjL-t[[t '��i1`4� �CIFJti i'1S "slai'� Omi ��NC.::6 wr'.i' iriri �l L4 m C'itdtlal� Lf1:f1L$�S+JSTlIi7A' wid remiluii eN, frvminkrci_1iriitfal can he WIN N1tAkr5'd,-,,d and Nfmlt lim a�ipr�«Frri gokerfim.-nI pitinnine xnd resp[irvw I J�€;ane N trier Fienult}' s.rf pJ Qurw Skini [h� irirN`gCT'irtg is 11W !.1mmi 4L�rternlwl, 30, Kill Itu Kona, i lard' i' Arthur M I' ix Septenriber 1.3, 2021 Stantec Consulting Services Inc, P.O. Brix 141 Hila, HI 98721 Tek t808) 494.2039 Mr. Arthur Felix Via email: aOfeIix vefton.net ISE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmenfal Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Deoi Nor. Felix: Thank you for the comment letter dented September 30, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA} for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Graft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Anoiysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I arty specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TZAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment -2., In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies car) the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoca Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight diztances due to extrerme curves and is narrow Wirth no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koahumanu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. l consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuano'aa place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the some specificatiorls as all other Kona Vistas reads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana`oo Place frorn Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of KekuanWoa Plane to Royal 'Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -cut is completed, the TIAL estimates a total of 30 addifional vehicles on Kekuana'oa Place during the ANI Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peck period. This is roua,�iIy one additional vehicle on Kekuana`oca Place every 4 rriinutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion, Q)� September 13, 2021 Mr, Arthur rellx Page. 2 of A .Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increosing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or Time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7, i of the EA. Rogcirding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana`oc3 Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, icor the A -M and P peak hours, respectively, The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary troffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Camment 4: The IAEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantlol adverse effect on public health. The Applicanf claims, "The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way, storrnwoter would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sectior;s as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in hurt 5: Findings and Reasor+s, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. QgMmgM : The Planning Department should not accept the DEM reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Krona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a grawth rate eof 1%. in contrast to the 2!o growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR, Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a neon -linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDQT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Longe Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got tin, our traffic engineers uses. 1 T_ ly ,m the 2025.LRTP forecast. Q)� September 13, 2021 Mr, Arthur relix Page :i :l Commenf 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics scan .:. r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 1. It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no can, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and raid -rise was considered. Low-rise multi -family housing was used since it provided a higher valume output. This land use hcs a very law standard deviation and on R- squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8. The TIAR employs an unusually law vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kacahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repo 1 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, tooth weekdays. The unusually law reparied vehicle valurne of 853 is also at odds with figure 4 of the TIAL, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kaohumanu Highway ❑f 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10°70 variation generally accepted in day-to-day meosurernents and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahum anu Highway section between Nani Kailua Load and Hualuleai Raced (north). Our froffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the TIAL for the project is uncle r�._ r ling, but the project's TIAR report does use numbers similar to those f r,_)v7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queer Kaahurmanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but rernain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns far the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Koahumanu Highway and kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be pr1critized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Resaanse 9: The Manual can Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCDj states, ,The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall neat in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility„ and others, The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention when: Q)� September 13, 2021 Mr, Arthur relix Page. 4 of A an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project_ The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any addifional comments or questions about the EA, please contact rrtie at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mich le.lefebvre stantec.corr cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC M aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From: Sent: To, Subject. Aittaehrnents- NLust eve attached. Daniel Malik e rnalakiid@Hawaii rrcnrn Wedn8sday, 5eptefiiber 30, 2020 8:31 AM Planning Internet Mail Proposed Raya! Vistas Hoisi nq Fra ect KV OWNERS D&Lldfdhuri re Tiatftc,ladf 1.Tlrl TRAFFIC 1' Damel Malakle declare.. . 1 all) a roshl e1I A, I = lona Vistas SLIbdIVIS10111J. Counry or law.-ai`i,'Suitc c51' llawai`i_ The propu�scd land de elopmeril project that is the suh?2ct of Ili,: Dria It lcri irLaml ental Assessment Suhmirtcd hs Royal 14''ldas f len ,rn Ili oJectTax Map Key Ncl s. L11 7-6-11210I6, '7-6,02 1:111 7, 7-h-02 l .01 fi. and 7-6-021,() l9 tityrth Kona Dimrtct, I laivaii'i IslanJ. Slttic 01 l lawwal't u1'4Lt; we personally as ww cll 3affects in,, inlertist in rval properly I ro5idc within 1 mile larid dewchirsntcnl project. In iuch capacilies, l haw,c Iirsdiund knowledge of flie rollowirg tactS and could and would t.wify Lfi1;rvlu irCi 111 UP 11 10 du SLI. 2. 1 have rcvi�wwcd tht pettding DRAFT FNViRONNI VITAL ASSESS WN'J' including the Trt►Mu impact Analysis Report by SSFhl I>>rcriational, dated July 2020 411d attachW as Appcnodix 2 to the DRAFT F,NV1tt( ON%1t. N AL ASS FSSMFpNT. l ant spwifically concerned about advcrsc trtt'`ic impacm both within and without ti c Kona Vislai subdi, ision thax :treo� opt Fi1114' ur 4iccurtetcly aiid'ressnd to the SSF 1 Trtt(liL ltrttla�l realy' iw Fi�}rc�rt. Tralfte nd rhe S�,FM Traffic Imisact Analysis Report. ari: discasscd in the body of the DRAFT IAVVI1dC]Iw!MENTA)1 ASSESSMENT. at pp. 49-56.0 and 7t _ 3 In rhe Kona V1stas subdivi%mn. the prop osod project rclic5 on the use c a substandard roadway. Kekuana'aa Place. Kckuuna`ca Place is very steq, has limited tight distanccs dui: to extreme curvlos and is narrow with no stdeww'allts The impact of increased traffl[C 1 arising from Phase I and Phase• 2 buildows, of tFic Rayal Vistai HtxttSirtg PrOjlj O 9s InadoNualely addressed in the SUM Trviffiw IrnpaO Analysis Report_ Which COCUS01; iw;tc:td on nnpacts alarig Queen Kaathutttarw Hiizhway. I atn piulicularrly conccmrn .xf That adflina nUrnerous vehicle trite to and from a separate subd1vIsiun ]II present tiangers and con4eslton to residents alone Kektiana`oa Place. 1 consider ihat the Planning Department should rLNutre: the appi icart t4) adds -v% these concerns. 4, The DRAFT" ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT rcquiris cvaluanov of oth:r,. ad vc•r c .5ctemcia)) wipac ts..5'uch its popi is nov or Jfecv Of? Public JicifirPe'S Svc L hapici I 1lawaii Adininistrative Rules In�;tr,-;M ofitloarely addre,wing thcsc issuc3. lrowevehr_ the DRAFT F~'NV1R(:)NMENTr'LLASSI.'-�',Nlt;ti F simply tg*ttt-res thenen. claiming that "nu adverse sccnlclarYv OTeCt_s trc eXp,!tterl LIC', 011>l,rrtt«nl WOLAlcl u<<lirc exi,ting infra-anictuni, provide infill housing, and is not expo-cled Ina result in ,ul~IsLactial demands tcri.'vUnty ser,6WLt;.'" Il is a tiL'r iws uini5osi i fOr telt" DRAFT ENVIROVMENTAL ASSIFSSM F.9%")- to fai I ter the potoitial ; dvcrw of int;rcasing tft4 uae- of sukl aa chid L�xtstittg irdr:stniL:l fo. Iike Kekuatia`oa Piacea 5. Tho I:)RAFf ENVIR 1NN11=NTAL ASSESS MI -XI' addreist:s adverse tr-affic impace.s only in tlhc context of wlicther lttc prrt;jcct would flcve a substantial adverse 4zl eo on P11M.- • hVilPh, Tlu ApplivaW Clainis. "The" Propo-sed Pra;cct would not :affect public heatth in any way; sttorttlwaler w(VIIId be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures_ Traffic impacts he +fie e l t (c �i tri .Cgrgtul rgnsi Lg ion ii�prc�ect deSiarl." Emphasis odded This baled conclusion does not address polential adverse impacts cis required by Chapter 11-200.1-13. Hawaii Admirtistrdlive liuIcs. 6, The planvingD patrtmcni should not accept the DRAFT FNIVIRO NMI -N I'AL ASSESSMENT's rchanceon die SSFM Trail-ic Imp:tct-%jmIy-,i, Id ;tsxlt_ March Ita.%tftw InIlowing defict neics: a- failure to address adver:,e traffic imltaetS IVitl!in The Kkina Vi;ta:; subtrliViskin artsIng fmm the 1.rrq�jeCr: h. Tho SSFM Traft Impact AnalysiE RcTort uscs a grumh rata of H -fl, in contrast to the 2 v gowih rater crrlpInyud by the 21715 Witcher Enginwcring Trafity Impact Analysis RcpQrt. Tratffir votigesli m is -��ry SQnsiUVL: to gruwVtltt MW ill a nun-Iittcsr, expolitnztittl relatl0fl. C. The SSFNI Traffic Impact Analysis RcpctrE odocw ij,)t rocogMwe ttittslti �eEr�rttt�Eatl haus-Ing chaff EcturistEc Cov r "[I ill %-1t1Ewaii according to ccri.itis d,-im and likly tErtderestlnt.ttes dally vehicle Irips aitriEaulab[a to h!iildwiI of"the propv,;L�.I "IN I IOVII, The NSFM Traffic Imp td Kqkw S-Esrjvw, , .m mau,nAy low vChiLle v01urni~ of 853 vchicics rur North hswnd C;1ttxn K azlttimanu highway cm the kc wd dates of April 30, 2D19, a mxkdaty amt AU IUst ?4, 2019, al Suturciay. compwo; d with the 2418 Witcher Fagiiwerhig Tyafllic lmpaet Analysis Report. which repwo d 1057 vchicle5 for Januat-�• 14 and 15. 20 16, both w eckdays- Tlw unusually low reported ~•chicle volume uf' 853 is also at adds .with Figure 4 of the SUM Traffic Impao Analysis Report, ww•hich sign• approximately 1(1 0 a'ahieies I}L,r h, MT 111 '1 E 16 fi)r Nurthlael and Qttwuu Kaahutmnu Highwaty at , ami. The! ciifl'erumc in k. Li I uniQ ib axlr- thurt cLmble thu maximum 10%wadatiun gvncrally a, Qvpted in dav-to-day ni;-asureinents and thus unreliable; 4. The reculmnendaLlon by SSFM Tmffic Irnpact Analysis Report Cor a t-outand;xbj-ut :rt QLICCn K;tuhurnatnu Hsghkaiy and Mulaiai Road (North) is inconsistent %with the traffic Cnrndor. IML rswcliutas Oat psis, warrants but rouaitt unsignalixad pre -sent traffic w<tt iv liability concerrt.s ti)r the ga���rn►iy� ut. The rcc• vwinciidatirirt by SSFM Traffic Impaci ATiE lv,.; Rpcwi For monitoring of the intcrswictn of OL]een K a.-Onirnaattt HiLfliway and KuAim H4g1t%'r1v iw inadwvquate. Where, as lwrv. a inWrsection passe more Chart C7nc warrant under all ocni.tlttiuns. tt rltcauld lic„` prwsrill/.gid Cua titucly and cicsign of signal for installaiinn. ThtS circums-taiwe will Ik exacerbat& by the prupctsc+l Itrcr.jo!t. i, 15 Mutt, thu Drart Environmental Assc.q;mL= mid SSFM Traffic lrttpaut 1lrxtt ysita I?O[ s')rt dOCS rttat jxrescrtt suli't4ient. ur d1bk pacts and analysis Mich than the adverse impacts on existiur, tnfra;truc;turc and resulling firam ijicrcus�d Initlk can bc: fully undcr:stnixi and result to approptialc: governnicnl planning and ros}wuns,,- I declare under penalry ofpeFjttry that the farcguing is true. Dated: Kailua-Kona, Sept 30 4 202 U. - electronically signed signature rianiol {C %ip— fritted amine: Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Box 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Mr. Daniel Molakie Vita email: malckled. -hawcii_rr_com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmenfal Assessment and Anticipated FON51 for Royal Vistas Housing Project, forth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Deoi Mr. Malakie: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 30, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA} for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Aritalysus Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the [SEA). I am specifically concemed about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 2: In the Kano Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of ca substandard roodwvay, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekucanooa Place is very steep, has 11mited sight distances due to extrerrae curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahumanu Highw way. I cam particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trir3s to and from o separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents alone Kekuanava Ploce. I consider that the Planning Deparfinent should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuana'oo Place is a County -awned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all ether Kana Vistas roads, including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact or Kekuono'aa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana'oa Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAL estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles can Kekuana'oa Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak r eriod. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'o(3 Place every 4 i+-i;,Je.S for the ;.-WC Iodd , which would not cause congestion. Comment 3: This CSF requires evaluation of. among others, adverse secondary impacts, sucl- is population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of sepcircately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious ornission Q� September 13, 2021 W Daniel Malakie Page. 2 of A to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure. like Keku arao'oo Place. Response 3: Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana `oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and P" peak hours, respectively). The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EAj. ,Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the pro ;1ct would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, "The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way, stormwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage str ciures. Traf !c impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This gold conclusion does not add.,ess potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.20D.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact hurnon health. The summary staternent quoted is included in Peart 5: Findings and reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment 5: The Planning Department should not accept the LEA's reliance an the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5; Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment_J, The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1170, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response b: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show can ir,ci :se in traffic volume. The 2135 Federal Aid Highways Long Range 1"n -r -asportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and'2035 were used to come up with the 1% growth rate. Alfhough we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used 1 % from the 2025 LRTP forecast, Comment 7: The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle Irips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Q� September 13, 2021 W Daniel MalaUe Page. 3 of 4 Response 7: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars or if residents will use the bus_ The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and lova-rise and mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output, This land use has a very low standard deviation and an R - squared value very close to 1.001, so statistically this is the bell projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment B. The TIAR employs an unusually law vehicle volume of 853 vehicles. for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15. 2016, bath weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at adds with Figure 4 of the TZAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Koahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10% variation generally accepted in da y -to -day measurements and thus unreliable. Response 8: The most recent Historic HDOT counf available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kaahumanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Read and Hual❑loi Rood (north). Our traffic count t❑ken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fo[rly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 9. The recommendation by the TZAR for a roundabout at Queen Kcohurnanu Highvv-ay and Hualalcai Road (North] is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsigncalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Koahurnanu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project, Response 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states, "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic cantrol signal," There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geornetric feasibility, and ethers, The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal Q� September 13, 2021 A+ir. Dame. MalaUe Page. 4 of A without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciafe your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please con#act me at 1808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Servlces Inc. t Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@-stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mari. Ashley From: malakied@hauvjir.rr,-corn , Sent. Wednesday September X 2020 8,37 AM To: Planning Intgrn-?' Mal Cc: dbrikoriac�)aol.c.um Subject: PrDpcs_-d R--,wal Vistas ldinusirq P'rgect AUac lr1'lent5� KI.' U`,VNERS Dec.aiation re Traffic pcEf. KV OWNERS De-claration re drainage pdf Please, sev a[ta hed. Daniel Malakic I)EC'LAR.NTIONs ter TRAFFIC 1. D�Vmel �41�alakie , cteclarc; f. I am a Tvxildent of j ; Kona Vita, whditi6iorw�, C outtty tfl' H3wni`i, State of Hawraei'i_ The JITOPOscd land de-veloprnent projccl that is the subject of the pending Mall Envirurnmenial Assessment submitted by Royal Vistas f ou-iron Projcct Tax Map Key tins. ( i) 7-6-02 1:616. 74021 M 17. ?-[r-1121,01 N, and 7.6-0-21 'll l 9 North I ovi DvMict. f lawaw't Island. SintC o0J 11wni'i of ects me 11t',rr+tlnally i.q well a; atTectc t„ y interest in real property. I reside within I [THIP' [distance] of the propose -i land kveloprncnt preTrrc:t. In such capacities. [ havc firsthand knokklcclg of the fo1[uw,ang 111cts :and Could it[ILI would lcstily thcrctu it"cawIILcd 4ipun to du sea. �'. I ltavc rcvic;wcd ttto pcoding DRAFTENVIRONIMENT11.L ASSE'SSIMFNT ill lutling 1ho Traffic Impact Analysis Roport by SSFM Iniornaational, diLed luiy 2020 and attach- xi asAf+pcaadik ? tr�zltvt� [1.1[w�l [;NffIf`Jpvlf;lti'lAl.SI:SIw11:1 f` 1 ani specifically cnncernod about acheiNe traffic era-ipacts both within and without the Kana Vista,, subdi'viston that arc nal WIN or;accurawlcly addre:s%od in the SSFM Trif>ku lmpacs Analysis Repurt. Trafiae alld the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Rcpim. awe fliscassad 1n the hotly of the: DRAFT I= VI1 ON} viF'NT_ L-kSSESSL%IE NT. at pp. 4S -?ti. t}7 and 7I. 1111 chr lsuna %,'HILA; StalidIVItiIOn. lh:., pToposiA pT- jecl rel its. tin Lhc uwv F a1 4uh tawwrlart! r+ azd�ti.�4, I t:l trui.a't7a Pl acr. KektaKnmAi i PFictf is w cry slcc-p, bass limittcl iight distances due to e.xtrcnze curves and is narrow with nc sidewalks. The impact of rncreasc-d traffic. arising frotrn Phasc I and Phasc ? hui[do uts oft he ROY aI Vistas IIousilt8 PNJ00 is iriacleyuaLdV addro,gcd in the SSFM Tragic Impact ,Analysis Repcii, which f ►cuscs Instead an impact4 alung Queen Kauhumanu High}vay. I am par'icularly cDnccrncd drat adding numerous vehicle trips to and Earn a separate subdiwisican will pry ,,c!iI ktarngwrs ;arta congestion to residents along KAtatna`oj PILice. I cons [der that the Plarsnirig Dcp,irtit, ni �Iiiauld rctiwrr the applicant to addres,s these concerns. 4. Tlt�: DRAFT ENV IRt:A!4 L"N I"A1_ A.S, ".SSMi:NT oo•,. ,IE;.itit ii . f arliutig others. 0[16eir..YE' rrrlixrr IN' V.Ifr Ir FA porfa£1ff+!r? . h! io. ':?c% Kai i?lit'l fti till publrf f£FC f jit-4 Sgg Chapter l 1-20C, 1- 13, Fw6aii A6iiiiii.titralivc Italics Inslcact oaf .SqU R. It: ddrssring 1Efe,� issues. hoi&ovo:r. tlac I?"Ir l` CNV IRC7l* MF-NTAi. A SESS W NT simply ignclros tlieni, claiming rbat r'No advcrsc aceor da- y wfi'ccts an: Cxpcciccl Sind: the dvvelitplilvil %vokild olilv.c oxisting inflmstmicture„ pr•ovik infill housing. and 6 coo :xpc4tcd to rtsull in--;uKsaantial demand~ ro CounlN sL-rviec,." II is a seriaetsC i :Ire Dk OCT 1:NA71R0N)v1ENTAl_ ASSESSIVIFN -lo lsail to address, the poicnii.il adv�,rsc impacts of lncrcasinL, the uic ti�f sub,taridaid vxistittg ir l't4strueluro. like Kcku3na,na 11I.3te. 51 Tltk DRAFT ENVIRONMET`wTAL AS V1. ;addreisc s adverse Iratfrc impacts only in the context of whether the procel would Hell's e&Cf ryra proNic h4,alrlr. The Applicant claims, "t -he Progaosd.-d Project would not ai'Itd PUbliV health in HUY way, stormwater would Ix appropriately disposal of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts h v r7 lake�rlf in Wrojecl Emphasis added, This bold conclusion dries not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapler 11-201) 1-1-1, l la-aii Achumi.s-trativc Rules. Tho Plann[ng Department : hoold not accept the. DRAFT INVIRCiNNUNTAL ASS I�.SSMF'4T'w relrlance on 111LhSSFM TralTic Irilpac'tAnalysis Report, which has the following deficiencies: failure to address advorso matter impacts %viffim thk; Kom Vi tai sulhdivision arising froth the projt.'ct; 1). The SSFM Trallic InTact Analy.%is Report ma1 grLLowili rete of 1%. err cc,ntt-ust Ii, the 2%' N w,%th rate ompleyed by the ?I)18 Whcher Ungitteering Traltlic hup.wt Ajutlysis Rcport. Trat-lic congetitiun is vl-ry sensltiw It, growth rate in a non-linear. exponeWiai tolatiun. C, TI to SSFM Trallkr< ImpacI Artalysis kepc,rt does nOt recogpijze muIH-gt;IwcF 11011AI hAmsing characteristic- common in Hawaii according to cmus data and likely widereMinr:itc; daily vehicle trips attrihulablc to kjilthmi of the ptupa„tel pr-+jcct; ti: Tklc SSFM Traffic Impact ,Anralysis Report kmipluvs an unu�uallw° loo, k,Ohjjc volume Irl' 1 53 ►rt:hk;Ic, litr NorthlKmad Qticer,1':.aahurnanu III iOWL'aw' 0 I the sciccted dates of April 30,1-019, a yw•cw; day aIId Attgkis 1 24, ?1119, a Sara rclny. cr=parcd with the ?018Vo) ICheT engineering TraMc Ijtip►WI Atin Iysis Rcrxirt. wwhir;h r-cTc,rte€1 l ()_5I vehicles far January 14 and 15, 2016, tenth wvoekdays. The Unusually low rept,r cd vehiule volume of 853 is it]su al Qdd, vw ith Figure 4 of rhe SUM Tr -1 fc Irnpao Analysis Reprarl. wvhich tilrnws approximately 1{156 vehicics per hour in 20 16 l or N ori h hiiund Queen Knah,imanu l l ighwa, al 7 a,in. Tlrc differcuLx in voli,n)e is nior: tl:ur, doublc the maxiinum ltl¢; vanaticm generally accepte,4 ira clay-to-dLn- moasuremL: nts and thus uraxeliable, 3 C. The reci--im eriLla6va by 5SFM Tt-atfie Impact Analvsis lip -port for 3 roundabout at Queen Kaahumanu Wghway and lluahilai RtfI (Nurlfl) is inc€rnsistent u-ith the traffic: curridor, lnlcmcctions Mat pass warmnis bul remain unsignah/A present traff=ic safett•liability concems for the j:oVCmiricnf; r. The TCO)rnmcndation by SSFi4l Traffic Impact Analysis Report for mI miltiring of the intcrsccOn of Qutcn Kaahumanu Highway anti Kim6ni Highway is Lina cquale. Where, at heFe. Ail ittt.t ctiuil PilSWS MOT: OIDT1 one warrant under all conditions, it 5huuld b6• prig}ritired ror surely .iiW design ul s signal fur histullkallirl. This circun sranec ivill be micerbati d by the ptopm'crl Pnijeci. 7, In tiurn, the Urtii'l I;IIVifOFL111elil l t setisluL'[it aril S:SFM Traffic Impact Analysis Rcpt -rt ducs 110l prescizt ±til ime.nl, credible facts ;incl MalYSiS -41LAL 012t Lh;: a,dvusc 1MIMCtc mi . istitig infrawtruc:turc and resu11ing ki'n m increased tra11te i;an he fully undi r,tot)d and r suit in talspr-priate &ov4rnitlwrtl plalming and response 1 declare utid;:r pcnalty of perjury Chid The ruregoing is true. Dalled: 1Cailx -Iona, Ilatitiai°i, Sept 30 '711241, SiPaCtirC: Pri-nted nanle, 4 electronically signed diel_ -._fie.. QL>!CIBATION car' DRAINAGE Daniel Malakie ,����latc. I . I am a Tzsldent at -Kona Vistas subdivision, County of Hawah, Statc of t iawai `i. T]w propos& i lanai dc,,cicxpment projc-cr that i5 the subject of the Wriding Draill Envirvrtrnerntal Asscssmcnt sc bwatcd by 1tc vd) viii --JS I IOUSin� Project Tax, Map Key Nus. (3) 7.6-0-21:0 16, 7-6-12-1 017, 7-6-021 JI IS. 01ILI 7-6-021.(JI9 North ki,n.t I)islrict, I Iawai`L Isla[gl, Stwtty of Iiawaiat alt crg me p rsaiia[Iy as NVc1ILLS :LII'LL I, LLL+ :I I,it real property 1 t'c'si�lca 4S+ltltin 1 mile --- [disuin►ej P f I I W IL11i14,�'r3 IL,ILk� •,IIL' ',k-10IN) It•IhI IN, -Kea. In SLICK cal iellles, I Nivc tifsi ta"nd knowledge of1ha fol1oving tants1111d could uI,I ICcIIIcki ullan Lea do ,ta, 2 1 1LLMR: r4L.iewod the peetdinv DRAF-I' ELNf)d�J�-NTAL ASSESSMENT unci aitachrnents. 1 an) spccilicwallW cLnicurntxl abvtat; Sewage and water 15 e 3 DISC Meed lopugraaphy, hi.Sturicul rapid slormwatcr run-affand ass iatcd damage pr;,,�nt hazards that are net adoqualely adrlrossL-d in t1`Ic Drah Environmental Asse3sment. SN I.}I, t.hcTcci f. 4. I aan awatc: that [cite citic facts]: 5 In sum, Lhc Zara t EnVirnnrnentaI Ass C. �lInen t tines nni diWUNS sufftiEent facts 41 n analvsis stwh that the nccessan di"dirl av ianpmwmcnt.s and diversions can tic uilderstuild A proper envinrimental assessment cannel leavc weaningful dt lads to be taken care of in the future. As I undcisund il_ suet circumstances wtauld lead io unlawful proj"i svgrmcutaflon, among oth,�r errors. 1 A haxrc cenclugton by, the applicant or acceptia g authority that nueded mfraswwtvre will mrnply with governin:nt mgulnlions is itzSufiiciCrtt. At ea mirtimmn. the DWI En,.1-ronrraeamI AssessmQnr niii io h�- rel-ised to sIiou• spec1fica]Iywhai inda:L4Lruc''..IIr: irmprovemenls arc required to tic into rhe C'ounty', drJinage sy,;Ion and how those iuipnivimi4rno, NvIll titriclion I declare under pcoalty of perjury that the torcgning is v-uG. Dared' Oilua-Knox. I{a%;Wl, Sept 30. 211?1l. Signaturc Ilumed name, 2 electronically signed Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec ConsufFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Box 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Mr. Daniel Molakie Vita email: malckled. -haweii_rr_com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmenfal Assessment and Anticipated FON51 for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Deoi Mr. Malakie: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 30, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA} for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Aritalysus Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the [SEA). I am specifically concemed about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 2: In the Kano Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of ca substandard roodwvay, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekucanooa Place is very steep, has 11mited sight distances due to extrerrae curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kochumanu Highw way. I cam particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trir3s to and from o separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents alone Kekuanava Ploce. I consider that the Planning Deparfinent should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuana'oo Place is a County -awned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all ether Kana Vistas roads, including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact or Kekuono'aa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana'oa Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAL estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles can Kekuana'oa Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oo Place every 4 minutes for The which would not cause congestion. Q� September 13, 2021 A+ir. Daniell Malakie Pooe. 2 of w Comment -3 This DEA requires evaluation at, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is ca serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekucana `oa Place. the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa i'loce is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the Am and P peak hours, respectively. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, 'The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any away; stormater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis Gadded, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 1 1.200.1-1 , Hawaii Administrative Rules, Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is Included in part 5. Findings and Reasons, and accurateiy summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body at the EA. Comment $: The PCannin Deparin-ent should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response : Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed sine those intemal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant.. Comment b: The TIAL uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in ca non-linear, exponential relation, Response Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts slid not show an increase in traffic volume, The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lang Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used tc come up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers 4:sed I% from the 2025 LRTP forecast, Q� September 13, 2021 W Dame. MalaUe Pooe. 3 of w Comment 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characterisfics can--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips Battrlkautable to buildout of the proposed project. Response_7: It is hard to predict whether Ba 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of TrcInsportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and law -rise cnd mid -rise was considered. Love -rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very law standard deviation and on R- squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8: The TIAL employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen K aahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, Ba Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for january 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusucilly low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also of odds with figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen l(aahurnonu Highway of 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10°70 variation generally accepted in day -today measurements and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kaah4umanu Highway section between Nani KBailua Road and Hu❑I❑lal Road (north). Cour traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDQT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard tc say if le -ie Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is unrl oir,ling, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to these ^rov7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roindabout at Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North is inconsistent with the traffic corridor, Intersections that pass warrants but rernain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns fcr the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahrumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Inhere,. as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be proritized for study and design cf a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project, Response-?: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCDj states, ,The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall neat in itself require the installation of Ba traffic control signal.'' There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and Bathers. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where Q� September 13, 2021 A+ir. Danlei M alciUe Pooe. 4 of w an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Comment 10. The steep topography, historical rapid stormwater run-off and associated damage present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the Draft Environmental Assessment. I aim aware that this project will have serious impact on the immediate and surrounding area. Response 1Q: The developer is riot aware of any damage to adjoining properties, including Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway, from water flawing from the subject property. Comment 11; The CEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood. A proper environmental assessment cannot leave meaningful details to be taken care of in the future. As I understand it, such circurnstances would lead to unlawful project segmentation among other errors. Response 11. Section 1.2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the two County -owned parcels. It describes that on TMK (3) 7-6-21:19r "Infrastructure during Phase II of the Proposed Project includes installation of a culvert system across the ditch to extend Kekuana'oo Street, which would then be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the KCDP "Official Transportation Map." For WK (3) 7-6-21:18, the project includes infrastructure for chor`bnelizing o portion of this ditch and includes a road and utility systern crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the KDCP's "Official Transportation lap." Additionally, as described In Section 3.3.2 of the EA, Kana Three would prepare a Drainage Plant to ensure that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by DF"W. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Comment 12: A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastructure will comply with government regulations is insufficient, At a minimum, the Draft E=nvironmental Assessment roust be revised to show specifically what infrastructure improvements are required to tie into the County's drainage system and how those improvements will function. Response 12; The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design of the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at a later date, the potential impacts from their construction are analyzed. Q� September 13, 2021 W Dame. McslakCe Pope. 5 of 5 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any addifional carnments or questions about the EA, Tease contact rre at �808j 494-2039 cr by ernail. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre. Ph.D. michele.lefebvre4stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Haai'i Planning Department Mori, Ashle From: Micky <maureenfelix @Dvosrizon.net -> Sent: Wednesday. September 3C. 2020 3:29 AM To: Plarning Internet Mail Subject: Ruyai Vistas Housing Project EA Cornmersts Attach KV.traffic,MtF.pdf Please find my attached letter to the Hawaii County Planning UL-partment which documents my concerns about the impact of the proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project on theTraffic situation which is aireadv averburclened. Maureen Felix 1.16525 I, MAUKEEN A. I i:UXJ &'Clare I I aart a iestdenl of Komi Vl v xuNihi%1arn j. County (If l-Ia9M.3i'L, SlAc o. 11iw uJ' i I h-- ).wap.- A I Mid .lrccl.DpcaaenI pl L—Ct that 11, Lht wulbjeci of the lwnditty DW Fjivirtrnmmnml A�seffisaiau submittal b}- RL)%&] % i1 .0m I-Lnming Prujeti'l yaLN N14p ewe, No& ;z1 016• 7-6*21:0E 7, 7 -6 -021. -DI 9, and ?. 6.021:014 North Mina DLMn~T_ Elrr ,'i IsUmri Statc dl 1AWaN affecasnwe lvrwk)Llliy as well as affeut•5 rad' irtwnst tin real p¢z Nnr I rL,-wle >.ti`iltin 250 ICet E4aVMWj Of LhV PVLjkAA2,1 14Ad dL!`% 1UpjjjcA r jTW[aL' 111 ,11t`.1 1ixut IN-Aiu d of [Hi fl -O A rid filrr.� Ind C.nld rtMi' n •c. ' w,' 'a titezrtu il'C&IW upm to doso, [ linve revic%cd the prrrdM6 L3:tW] F N. 'O'lkil ^� I kwiudirill liw I ruil`it: 11ni- i :Vlaah -.». HvIxin by S!ik!41 lnlrre abonaL "d"[;:J iWN , -11,1,i Lints ai4 chcd & AppcnIx i u) tlac 13RAk T E_.NWJRI_ahMEN [All AYSY S:'4dFN I ' arri SfWO belly olwcn"A 4b.hul Awise tmft'ic imprrI4 ik ili Aith in and V6i1haiuL LILT Kona Vislai suhdivisiw thn IN teat N11+• iw kiu trwoly LLLwrr•!,sv J Ir, IL, SSFP TwAL hill CL AiWyeis Rr.~,.rurt. l r•Lt;llirr ...,1 I'1iw "4 N, E 1,wafliti ILL 1;a41 -Al �Jlv as Reixlri ,ue In of L1ic Dlt.+k -I. 1-14V MONN12 „N I A: 1 . r[E per Vs- at,, r5l acid 71. I In the KcAka V i-4 11.4 OLLI1xii4vuL-tt, 111r Inuposedl pr01"I rr htson ux u" of d balhstsn&rld roaldw'jp•, K k uwm'os Mwe I,4'k1Mnd'k"11„hLtcc i5 A'M ';Ift''+, hs!; limited SrU-hr dlt5tr [�c duc t,. e�.irr`ii',a' czar+cs ;ttt! _. iulmiw• with no, sidr6%a]%_ The impactuf in�rta�W truli., a rigmp Fria Ptuso I canal, i'fa,ss .: t�ulJa�l'JUtr4 . f th_ R } Si k' Lux lluua�inyj 1'Yotrxt aw irw;ad-{.E�uL� � w jddT-,.:-,svd rn trt --- SS FM 1'rnfli., Impi o % MI It 115 RC111 117, M Ilk 1 ? C,Vt< Wit, S:Cjd oll I -y -l" -4. 11 ory Qwen KaLJwmwnu I [am pan I CU�flfl.L C.l I WCMCd. ;bJ%1 fk14[IJkg' .J-- I% I i -:, 1-.: Jhd 61111.P A WPUJ'MV ;ALW461sioll kill p%,:m ;LF --4r4 ind cc iwvticp:i I k"KIF 10 - .1 I K,e1LLLUU'-Jd Piw,: I CMAdw that the N'M'- -iddre-s Al The D1:z'6j I L-NI. Ll..% I tri ,y,., require:-, cs,i I. i :Boor I CI I n'111 I In' -V o1scr... ';,,v('hzNcr PS4r I - ' I INVJRONS#�lV"[Al ASS;PSSNILNt .amply ipvry11CUP. N,tvci%r %oO(%ndnrk eft vI.% mv cvpevWd slocc thic acvzjkipmcnl %%-v1A4J wilito '&;:JrC nallvs,lc U111111 kOlWfJt% 15- LWt -Cxpvcwc1 w rcalull in NUbstlwial L 'l1qj' t, 11. jl 3 WMOU9 CIMNliOrm fksr the MV -'T t,X\'1RONM1-%4 I I I 111 io addiv-s,% It* fv,lenhal ndycry Aw LLW o 4-'11'11,17L IiL k.Ck%.LUA tW f 1w ! 1 1.% : 1 1.1 '1:1 ry--dPL -11. !°1t .ht ihemi-xi -- j!J qdmoirn pethhe iwatM no Otliplicant damm "I lir Pfipi-%ed hopwl vwiAld rwi Xmt pigbilil; fca]Lh in an-, of in 17—phzih itidm. Thik wild MCM dON'S Th it JLI,Jr, ,r; I-11fFit :A adverme mpac-'s as required by C*wr 11-2100 1 -1 flAwla AdminimrOvc RWes. �� ,ir Pl.inni-io ) i:'1tS cm reel.-luId m=v ac:epr the 1112 ti I. ! f `t 1' 11" 1 lwa v!I " I %I :1C5t 4lT TT's :6ancc 4m the SS." M tnfltit; Imprcr Anmilr5 k Rti /ri, %,hich �l I� I]r, I.1,t lwll.l deficiancicsi a Iiululrr to addmbs 21dYCrw. trail l,; 1lNL11 ct. . withn the Kom Viltm, auNimic,r, L1ri,111r hrnm the rrl•jcd: b no 5SFM 'l-maftic lmp!•xz AnaJ4si5 Lic'plorr uA5. a y,ruw th rric (if i %. is CIl11tliva to the .''% pom,Cls rain cmployW b3 the 21 [1 Witcher hngm ng Irs}iir 9r.><PA I AmdySi% kepm, 1 -rabic cl,ngcstiiu is vi:T-� 4rnudT Nv W ar,--Wli rblc , a rl?.Mi-lineat, Impamcm6al relmi m r TI, ..,4 : ! rr T'r;, ;..ir Ir.,,.i, P -p, -T- °. ,,s w IN reen.q_ i ,°i° rill:hs-�w�41Cts9Ci,,turl I'!e,r,!; I7.If:1,:a;al.l! �,• ,! r! r r. ll;la 11 ,Ir II ;:r ,,11 jai'll *hl ll VIN 11auUl9c u malex dml51 +elude trips lxrOICO, rauli; lrxip i A;i l y515 Beppu cmplo« s Ln unumiedly ltsu vchkic k1 ,r, I I Fl, a rwlmcvp K.-.:ih,OT1 +i I.a��ti il, tLs Of a wcNaklJ+a;w lxsl L%US' 24, 019• o $,'�IurLbs . ,,ulmlp.ur�J Ww'ill': the .t11 11A'itchcr If,rib Beefing I't:IItk IrnpKt Aulyiis Relraam wlN6 r wrt" ll)37 vC1171M1V% Ivr ,mawr) 14 mAl 13. 2016" 111:th-AN;,t;klill.v fI;, In IN r. 0.411-, lid%► tC�U I • I I - SII1111H 4,113 t : fa,pl 1 I-' • '•:rh Fipre 4 C0 1 h '4;SF\1 I rltili4 1l'N-p:!I-r " , Idy-tts l erorl ' I' , ',r -r+' :i^ ,; ' I: ' .,;IT .I:^c M hour in 2016 for Nmthbound quchm KAahumenu 111Al:is ,LY ai 7 u, m. 'llbe dll_•,!�:i;,:e in w,'unw it, mory diai"6.,ublle ffi :1:.mI11141,!1.1 1^1'-,� , JI 1111111 ll grrlldi'tlily ,►e-0C$%e,` � �.,. •rrr-star me Il ncriIs and ihw; urrreh:lhle; L Ifs=: f`L'.z r -•;=i1 �.�.:1I�r} f+l 4\F'4.1 I-TliI In1r2,q 111:1 , il" I:.r'I,.., •. 1.',r I r. },fir, rl,i}lnw alOuc,k l KAahu mnu 1Lsghway awi I I:rzlyl +i l:na.:i I, ,rsC�r sw !rcan,A,ra-nl wih i 1.;!r'i fA'T Olt: vovk"rilvil-, h: N,LSlifliztti7 rLI r JI -09 C f or the in tcrsmiion al Qmcn K&ihunLdnu 11 i yhway and K, Lakidt I I [g] i %% ay i% j nadequwt Whc7u. 41.w pki-w,. mr-ir I khr Li-rtlpj jj-AjV-r Ell I ;;- 11ij I I I i,T,S, fI 014jilltJ p IC li , hV 7- Mi ;rj: j for mdy am design da xigml for mmoWmicit I i ri 1! 1"1 !9'." mnimmWI Aswmmml oand Relvort docr ei- lilt- f,,.i - 7- .xwh thul th., 7!0, -aking from irwircowd, ull 1: -Lc LAII ht it I I' I do: uv uilder 1%- laity 01";Xrju ' thiel Lh9? f'OrC4VaUng IN (ruc [tau d I.SoqmkK,7 5('. 70211. Kaitua-Kom I Mnur�vn A Fclkx 4 Septerr'rber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec Consulting Senrtces Inc. P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek t$QS) 494.2039 Ms. Maureen Felix Via errlall: maur .�­,q- = I x_ ck:" Vc°n?on.net RE: Comments can Traffic Concerns in the Graft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Dear Ms. Felix: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 30, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEAj. I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed belcw. Comment -2., In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies or) the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoca Place. Kekucanaaa Place is very steep, has limited sight diztances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidevwolks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koahurnanu Highway. I ❑m particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Plcice. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuano'aa place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the some specilicatiors as all other Kona Vistas reads, including paved sales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana`oa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed cls the connection of KekuanWoci Place to Royal 'Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -cut is completed, the TIAR estirnates a total of 30 caddifional vehicles an Kekucano'oa Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles durng the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana`oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Q� September 13, 2+021 Ms, Maureen Felix Ptge.2of4 .Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7 ,1 of the EA. Regoi–ding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oo Ploce is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The traffic oralysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicont claims, „The Proposed Project world not affect public health in ony way; sto rmwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have leen toren into careful cansiderraticn in project design." Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.201.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4. The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in hurt 5: Findings and Reasons, ❑nd accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. QgMmgnt : The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 8: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 29, growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineedng Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Flan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1% growth rate. Although are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineer's u�ec 1 T from the 2025 LRTP forecast. Q)� September 13, 2+021 Ms, moureen Felix Page', '::,t q Commenf 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 7: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with ria people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of TrcInsportatic-�n Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and law -rise and raid -rise was considered. Law -rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volurne output. This land use has o very law standard devlaticr and on R - squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8: The TIAR employs can unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahurnanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engine e, inq Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, tooth weekdcys. The unusually low reported vehicle volurne of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kciohumanu Highwoy ❑f 7 a.m. The difference In volume is more than double the maximum l No variation generally accepted in day-to-day me❑surernenfs and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahumanu Highway section between Nani Kcailua Load and Hual❑loi Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard tc say if le -ie Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is unrl oir,ling, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those crov7cled in the 2016 HDQT Count. Coaraaraent 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualaiai Road (North; is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unslgnalized present traffic safety liability concerns far the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahurnonu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on Intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be pr1critized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project Respor2$e 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCD� states, "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility: and ethers. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAL does mention where Q� September 13, 2+021 Ms, Maureen Felix Page 4 of 4 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project, The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signcl warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre. Ph.D. mich le.lefebvregstantec.corr cc: Diehard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC M aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashle From: Micky 4maur r+feCix@verixor5.net-, Seat- Wednesclay, September 30,202C 3.26 AM To ; Planning Internet Mail - - Subject: Royal Vistas Housing Project EA Comments Attachments:. KV; 7rain,NIF_pdf The attached letter expresses my concern about the impact of thL- prepased Royal Vistas Ficusi rig PrcIen cn the drainage prG6lems that aIready exist ir►the area, Mawreen A. Felix 1.165041 I. A1:tiI sCtiI:E: ' A. TT.•.I IX. Ji:63M: I ani a mskkm gal' F:ona Vi5m, subdi�,i- iwt Ckyunr, u t I la -mu't. SiAiv ul 1 Thr ps2,potpzd land kwrlup--mov prt�Eei[ Ural aw llrc .utak+.14x1 OCT11•- EI, Drali F,i4iruaIF] wruEul s-ukxni ttrul l:t 'ti' sOaS I {ur-. r L Pro.;,x t Tnx Nt.hp Kq- 1'rl ;$- 0, , 7 •F -W I : U I h- 7.6- 17 1.itilY.i-6-021.019.. :nw 710NurlsrKen. ri.'r_Huutli'i1slr3.A,SWk-OlPfl%3J`r alloots me un311z j,4: w0l as o ewLs my rrlere-': i A pralperrc l reside %vilhin 2 --Sl) rLel IdiNttis .cI v tKu I +a,IvwrJ Lo. lrtirlaprnew r�•�,•� . r ri: Yi lrvi",kdgeofil,c .. l} %k ire brit-, v I h II. .1wT4wl Wish%. Iaria-gxvil°iwii% o'rworned alwmit rhe envirrwttic n l irgvcI o1'tlni_F prorct 1 he aiccp rraprrg,u+hv. hi-5,10Marl rapid oomil, alcr riJn-t ffand rat,,,,, :rlr,l Brei t� pr \1YI 116tL ds E1t11.'11'k rR►l u�4*qIA[ wl4 4kUles4cd in Ihe1lr4It 1-n% ioted ivi.,.Il A—,—I, ;1 I am a66:trc thAr t1 -% pr+kjecr LOO have wriouas it pwT or, the itnnrscall,-le rind �vrraraldiap;� nr�s In +rirrr.:fac 13rrati i°:sriatcirtltrcrttul r1�w.'liti�llcatl d„e� aa�rE rlisr.•rx� �alClricuE liut� ari ar�tl> 14 rlsefi IY at Ijac rrcric ry Iirrlinly a arnrrt+ er>rrrat d9�tf d:tiersearlo vlu� Itir urrticr5da�cxl. A �rEw[-.-s cn+rrlwm,�-rTit asf;e-.1mortt cannot le-mvc meininglial Vria iIt to b,: tah-n car- ,'Nfir the fliwm iK I un.irrsund h. stroll cirrrlm.lMWEA W(Flilr1 ka{1 Itr unhl fUl lrrrrjOCI S10%MX MtHtirM. a>!r ILIF ,):her emir - 6 A X44,%.• 4u$i'iumod0%) tiICe1141It4.IRui Jr.tl,t.tk'% 11EA ircuder1 I :�i mimp tql: I)r-t L' F I w lukl'not;pj Avn-4S11ewl 'd l%ci rKil til rwo vi 1110 %il. LL 1,CVL=til rl%' fila h Ni-. iJcIl 1IU31 II& !, utwrLit] " HLI%k11),LGtI CIA I11i d its ILI aidw-V11'reill ILrai f.rcr eau IR' 4i ldcr'l' i.A�, het olont pl .•I°. i !cm]% cla- 'M a villi! 1l:.• fllwl i I r','v' 'imelitai rr 1' rnuel kw tc> n cd 147 ad re4w LhL Ie,CE lI'-R, 4hw ro"C 't'cr, J -J pr:",.z: •;xor of N, llohjik?c 1,1idI ti :Y rnm R1_n f "ti .cm L}i i�,c guhi,NL parrcdb. 'J" Iar ulktu rclialt• or PCFJ Tr IN11 ilhe lorcrermy t% 1:1A[ f'i4nury rl A. l'ti 1,1.M L 8 September 13. 20121 Stontec Consattinsg services Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tel: (808) 494-20:39 Ms. Maureen Felix '~iia email: moureenfelix -"ver;zon.net RE: Comments on Drainage and Cultural Resource Concerns in the Draft Environmentat Assessment and Anticipated FON'SI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawaii Island Deae fids. Felix: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 30, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. The steep topography, historical rapid stormwater run-off and associated damage present' hazards that are not adequately oddresse?d in the DEA. I am aware that this project will have serious impact on the immediate- and surrounding area. Response 1: Kenna Three LLC is not aware of any damage to adjoining properties, including Queen K&ohumanu Highway, from wwoter flowing from the subject property. S;ommeen# 2: The DFS, does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood. A proper environmental assessment cannot leave meaningful details to be taken care of in the future. As i understand it, such circumstances would lead to unlawful project segmentation among ether errors. Response 2: Section 1.2 of the EA describe=s the drainage improvements on the two C�-,.,­ity-awned parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify thclt on TMK (3) 7-6-21:19, "infrastructure during Phase II of the Proposed Project includes instollotion of a culvert system along with utilities and roadway across the dutch to extend Kekuana'aa Street, which would thea be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance ord called for in the Kana Community Development Plan f CDP) "Official Transportation Map." For T K (3) 7-6-21,18, the project includes infrastntctum for chonnelizing a portion of this stitch and includes a road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the CDP's "Official Transportation Map." Figure 2 has been revised in the Final EA to clarify the locations cf the two drainages in the project Area, Additionally, the tent in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that Kona Three would prepare a Drainage Plan to ensures that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage Place which would be reviewed and approved September 13, 2021 Ms. Maureen reiix Pale 2 of by Deparirnent of Public Warks (DPW). Text has been added in Section 3,3.2 of the Final EA to identity possible options for addressing the issues from existing flooding - There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are ,-.es.-Abed and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Comment 3: In sure, the DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the important h awaiian cultural and archaeological features can be understood let alone properly preserved. At a minimum, the DEA must be revised to address the location, data recovery and preservation of the Holualoa SOde components present on the subject parcels. Response 3. As described in Section 3.6 and included in Appendix 5 of the EA, two Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) reports were prepared for the project. As part of the AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evaluated for their significance. The AISs were conducted following Hawaii Administrative Rules 13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sites were considered significant under critedon d because of the information That was learned during the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs ensures that their information is not least. The documentation done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. Regarding the rack walls within the project site, there is ca historic era road (Site 24211) documented. This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is nal smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of ca h6luca. Also, the walls were 1.0 meter in height and is siryilear in constructed to similar historic era rock walls constructed along historic -era roads. property boundaries, gcrdens. and cattle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3. walls located in the northern and nartheastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of a Land Commission Award (LCA) #3660. Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the same gulch. it is unlikely that this is ca hdlua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a hblua in the project site. September 13, 2021 Ms. moureen Felix Page. 3 of 3 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the FA, please contact rre at �808j 494-2039 or by ernall. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. I 4'• Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre stantec.corn cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori. Ashfe From. Micky <mauteenfelix e@i veriznn.nm Sent: Wednesdays, September 30. 202n 3 22 AMo: P13nving Internet Mail - - Subject: Royal Vistas Housing Project EA Comments Attachments- KV,.Arch, IvlFpdf.pdf I am concerned about the archaeological impact of the proposed Royal Vistas Housing Pr*ct, please see my attached letter. Maureen Felix 1.16523 IkICLARAMN 01 NtAILqTj',jS A. FELIN 1. NIAU RE LN A� H-lix. &-ctarn: i I "fit a Fv,.iLtvT11 O'Kimm Vkiw, suNliLigiort. CotmtN of Hal%ai'i. Simir Lai bawai-i [IT. 11 t I P '! , ic .• I. I i I:; - 1,FIt F v I * I i fix i, the sw ii mf ud ibc pc ndino .'% F i % iro iurmi ral ,%Sscal ,,;:p I `,,, lml;uud bi R.!,. Al V;ktm, I It, wJnl,; Proji.-a I&A Kip Kcy Nine OIi 7.6-0"1 016, 7-6- 4111 111' 7-f -Ik 11 '1 � ,.,I Ip I I !I :17 IJawaj'j 141&,sj S14fic .01 jj!)N;AI*j ;iINcis Inc pci,-wwkAlty as well 44, a-rYdcm my interem in mal prqxrty, [ reside wirbin 191) fem W V 'LhV III + pi -,,:d lid dk: J Op 111% 11 L PCAyr In such q:zi I 4wivatt. t have I'kmLhwd -.t 14 -AL! 1110 "1 0'. T W11 ;ITIJ -.k,jI!A upw i" do. Pr 11 4 pFa5Cnj NWXkjj 1h4l AN MLJ R:OLJU.Ydkl&C s ',:d In thC �Mjl 1'11% I I Colt Ilvhw d1lo -1,;, rowI 'I'ak c, rrIo!A-- ITNIPLP I ore 11W miflie'llotir Iwd �Ijr"Iuridtrq arca 9 lyi ;Lmi. the Drah Fnvimrimvi"l AoLqcwmcnt does nowt dkc-- 4ufficioni I'kii aod on,y "I 'Ali. - 'h jr te nooccwmm Lfrainagr imp,orrm-.-m - ind Jiwm�on% cm 1w unde m.wd A 11FIA A -,I, L %.- 111'..INI "F11, d.-,ATh. To lac 1ACII,;a7v: LA IP111tv ars onj ether m-im 1 1, - 11' - ,, .i v . 71 01 "4 , - , . - - I r I; I "L .1 ' !i.- , t -;-I, - ., I . : . I. � I . '? I- . : . It:,IQU Lko 4"" 111-61.5VI 11 JI Ii I It IL Al Uk: I LIM ..t- Ig o chi: (-ounty'3- dSaiiwgc sN OicTo and Fo%% ow,,w In 2 L 8 September 13. 20121 Stonte+c Consatting Savices Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tel: (808) 494-20:39 Ms. Maureen Felix via email: rnoureenfelir,:�vedzQ-i_nr_•f RE: Comments on Drainage Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawai`I Island Dear Ms. Felix: Thank you for the comment letter dated September 30, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The steep topography, historical rapid storm titer run-off and associated domoge present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the f rnft Env'ironrnentol Assessment. I am cwcre that this project will have serious impact on the immediate and surrounding area. Response 1: Kona Three LLC is not aware of any damage to adjoining properties, including ween Kc€'ahumanu Highway, from water flowing from the subject property. Comment 2: The LEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood, A proper environmental assessment cannot leave meaningful details to be taken care of in the future. As I understand if, such circumstances would lead to unlawful project segmentation among other errors. Response 2: Section 1-2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the two County -oiled parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify that on TMK (3) 7-6-21:19, „Infrastructure during Phase II of the Proposed Project includes installation of a culvert system along with utilities and roadway across the ditch to extend Kekuana'oa Street, h ch would then be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the Kona Cc rnmun ty Development Plan (CDP) "Official Transportotion Map." For TMK (3) 7-6-21:18, the project includes infrastructure for channelizing ca portion of this ditch and includes a road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the CDP's "Official Transportation Map." Figure 2 has been revised in the f=inal EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages in the Project Area. Additionally, the text in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that Kona Three LLC would prepare ca Drainage Pian to ensure that development runoff would be September 13. 2021 Ms, Maureen reiix Page. 2 of 2 contained onsite. The Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by Deporlment of Public Works (DPW). Text has been added in Section 3.3.2 of the Final EA to identify possible options for addressing the issues from existing flooding. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Comment 3: A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastructure will comply with government regulations is insufficient. At a minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must be revised to show specifically what infrastructure improvements are required to tie into the County's drainage system and haw these improvements will function. Response : The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design sof the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at a later date, the potential impacts from their construction are analyzed. We sincereiy appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre:--sta ntec.com cc; Richard Wheelock, Kana Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Deparimenr Mori, Ashley From! jeseah Visconti <Javlsconti,:�stic9lo al.net> Sent:—Pursday. C3 ober 01.25ZC1 11:33 AM To: Plann;fig tntempt Mail Cc: ChrminaW'411FIVIIII10 Visconti Subject: Poyai Vistas Housing Profeta EA comments Attachments, JV Dedaraticn.Rdf Planning. See attached declaration in apposition to the proposed development referred to above. I am very concerned about the additJonal traffic- through our neigh6orhuod, not just the safety issue but also, the increased road rvoise, The school taus pick upidrop oft' on our corner, Paulehia Street & Puapuaani Street is of additional concern as it is somewhat a blind comer. Thank your for oonsldering us and our neighbors. sue Visconti 75 6104 Pau lehla Street Kaitua Kona, tit 1..1()SJ'1'I I, 11Sc ONT1, declare, 1. 1 am residcnt of Pa;.,lani Estates (suhdivisionj. Cousaty° tal' Hawaai' i, State of liauwai`i. The prcipused lane] development pn)-jut that is the subject al' the pending Mar Environmental Awsgrmont suhmittrxl by RuN di L'istas 1-lOUtIng Project Tun. Map Key Noq_ ( 3) 7-64121,016, 7.6-021-.017. 7-0- 02 l -019, and 7-6-021 °O 0 North Kona Di%rit;t, Haw►rai`i Island.. State of l�awai`i ull :ts me per�inally aj ww'L:11 as of c4j,., my interest in real propene. 1 t ide ►witlsin I mile cif the prtapusW land dcvelopnient project 1n such capacities. I haw tirsihand kru)wledge of dw ltallnwin$ facts and could and would testi 5 thereto it`callcd upow, to do SO. 2. 1 have revievved the pending, DRAF-1 LNV(RONitr FN'rA1, ASSCSSMi NT includingtht! Traffic 1ntpat LAnalysis Repan ltiy S�'Fl.t Iriernational. rl tvd July 2020 and attached as Appendix ? to the iJRA I k,NVIRONME1 7AL ASSESSM1~N't . 1 am spwir ally conc:.c:rrwd about ad,%criie Irailic impacts btath within and without the Kona Vistas suhdivisicata that are Hall fully or accurately addressed in the SSF14 Traffic Imp;3o-art :analysis R"rt. 1 rafhc and the SSFkl 'I a- ;attic lj�npact Analysis Report_ are disettswd in the hodref the DRAFT ENVIRUNMEM Al . A SESSMFXY- at pp. 48-36, 67 and 71 ;. ]ti I h o Dona Vistas subdiy isiurn, the proposed projceI rclILk tin the aw 0f a substandard roadway, Kckuana'na ,Place. Kekaana'oa Place is wcry seep. has limited sight distances dW LO cMtelne curlew and is narrow %Nith no sidcwt &N. The ilmpae.t of increas d traffic arising (runt Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouls or the Rayad Vistas Housing Pri,Ieci is inadequalcly ayddrmed In the SSFNI Traffic Impact Analysis Report. which 1ncawses instcad olk itliip i t:� alortg Queen Kaahurnan>_E HighWay. I arta particularly concerned that adding numeraus vc hic1c tripti t(I aad tram a separate suhdivision will present dangers and L;on estlon to residents along Kekuanz'oa ['lace. I ccm idcr that the Planting Deparinieni ')x)uId require the applicant to address thcsc comclrns. 4. The DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM. FNT requires evaluation of. among others. aeh-ery-? sec oncirrrly, irripoet.e..%lit-h rj% pupid alliin vhUrrgr:.% (rr t'#eciN un pliNiv Or°r1r'►rex Sev Chapter l 1-20U. 3. Hawaii AdminisrrLrtive Rules. Instead of squarely addressing; tlhu.s issrs�:., trio wrver. the DRAFf FNVIRONMI:N'I AI. ASSES51r ENT simply ignores them. I.sIII:jriv Ili.it "N'- :JLI%eati: tieeittLdar� eflItcts 4ar,.: expk�cled since the dcvclopnvrLI would atiliFe existlntE. inframructure. provide iitfill housing. autd is rtcwt exlvete+d to result in sutr., xilcal dcrnands to County servic4rs." It is a �c:riuus ua lssion for the DRtAI+ f ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT to fail to ad&ess the potential adti rse impacts of inerm ng the use of substattdjid eXisting iuli tructure. like Kekuanwoa Place I he DRAVT FNVII C7: MENTAL ASSUS-),IHINT addresses adverse traffic impacts curtly ha the cantext of whcthtY llt4 pntject would Have a mrlwux tol uc1iv—se eff�cr vit pul, it health The Applicant claims, "The Propowd Project would not affect public health in any way-. ctormw•ater v4•cw[J be appropriately disposed of in drainage structLire N- Traffic inipact.s have been taken hurt careful considuatlu in ,prQim dt�,siga," Emphasis added. This bald coticlu ;or. loss not address putentadti dtivea-St ttttpacts as required by Chapter 1 1- CM7.1-13, Hj-,vuii Administrative Mules. i t7_ I lice Plannilig l)el,arlrncrtt Siruuid jl,.,t pcceri The DRAT- 1 F.NVIROWOL;N' FAL AS 'sf. iENT' reliance on the Sof 'I raffic irr� :�i:1 Analysis Rcport. %which has CIS. ti)11nwing dc; f ecicncles: a failure it, address adverse traffic: impam wilhin 1% Kona Vistas subdivision arising t7onr d -re Pru j c:c-t b. Fhc SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis R"Po i uSCs a grO%th rate 0f l ",1&. int contrwq tv the ?"io gmwth rare employed b} the 2018 Witcktcr kttiginecring j'rciific Imp ttt Arialysis Report. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to #mwth ratc in a n t)n-lin`ar, cxponential relation: C. 'Fite SSFM l-�-ratlric Impact Analysis Repori dins not rccogulze multi -generational housing characteristics LXICItnn0,1 in l laivaii accordirng to census data and likclw underestrrnates cially vehielc trips ultrihutable to buddow of the pror sed project: d. l hL: SSW Traffic Impact Analy os Rgxnt cinploys an umusn 11-1 iowf vehicle t'Oluttte of 853 %chicles for NurthhouIld (.hi:Lti KAahutnaau highway «n the sciccied dales of April +11. 2019, u %A,cek-&y and Nugu%r 24. ,014, a Saturday, compared with the 1.018 Witchc;r ;11} Lucunrjig -Traffic: ini pact An.alysis Depart, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, Nxit weekdays ]'he tinusualty ]a% wportcd vehicle volume of 855 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the SSFM Traffic impact Analysis Reporl. which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per I-K)ur in 2016 for-Northlscrund Queen Kaahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference ire volume is pure thart double the maximurrn 10% variaann generally acc:eptn:d inr Liar -lo -dare =a2mrements and thus unreliable: C. The m,tanu-ncndation by SSf M Traffic Impact hrsalysis Report for a roundabout a! QLicen Ka I Iighway and I iu.aIalai Road J"N-orth) is inourLAstent with the traffic L:t.`rT'11J1r1 IIIIWI *+iCiWI « 1111A \\irr7.srll* NO rvivairT s.1 F1tiEL`11.1ICrrtl pre,;olt Caiillw 4;llolr# I:;IlillM t•tirick�ms It,r 41 y4 piPP 4:r:lmc: IE. I, II1 t err+,;t'.4'rl�.dat�l!�'k 1 1 ralltC�' 1111p1�tal lrrsil}til RVIN11111 6011110111101',11 Itil lh-u inLertitClioll 01 Que t1 Kuaht:tll.ulu I liVhNN� l% ::ntl Ir`ual.ini Is rltaEpt:Lpi:.lte. UAlere :1'+ llrrr. all imi:1.'ic'oivil olkir; 11r4:11 on.; ti%Jrr.rrlt t: kLl ad o%Tlkk1 o1I1-; 11 SlIOUld Ft.' k1rit1r11ir4ti Iltir ,tUJX 11IJ 4C,1jjU31111':1 si::rr:il 1111 iclwt.1[lalll+ill. I I1rs M the hrteptc. se"I projL'O III ,17111 the I)r;111 I.nti,r�nl:ticrlt.rl .';sess11�r1r And SSIAl Iral'IlL Impact An; k -w, Rcvx� 1 I. o ., ! 11rosa'11l 'mt1lictent.Ow'lc{L'erLI III-T.lultiairl 4:aitilirl it 'I t•Irt: 311d w�,ultirlg floor incrc;Lwd lr.,C I Ix. !trll% andcu;usa7d and In 8, 1 .rill ti.Lm t:4,+lo°rltcii.111,pill the ;Icl,lialr+l7,rl I ntfli,- tart ow Nir'kca .1111.1 Il1rs1l4!h alar l OE-hhorhood r'rom :t soioi .inn ''noisLL' p or,peellte l cl�r~k:r,°� �tln1��1 I1�rl.11t� a�I Iti�wrplrr� tll:lt 1114. I��rr*'E�i�In� iti frtwlc` D.AtC11' I'L4�iM uj tlrinl. IlillEilr L _ L'J�J �rl.i�r. F F rirlled r1uTnUel. , .3(1tiC'Tl ll `� �• i \£:11T1 l o `f 4 Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsufFing Services hx. P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek {8081 494.2039 Mr. Joseph Visconti vice email. jovisconti4sbc.�llobal.net RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kana District, Hawal'i Island Dear Mr. Visconti: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 1, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (D � for the proposed project. Blease find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Craft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Anaiysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IDEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific cornments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment -2., In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies car) the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoca Place. Kekucanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight diztances due to extreme curves and Is narrow with no sidewalks. The Impact of increased traffic arising from Phase I and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koahurnanu Highway. I cm particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Ncice. I consider that the Planning Department should require the apprccanf to address these concerns. Response 2. Kekuano'aa place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the some specifications as all other Kona Vistas reads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana`oo Place frorn Royal Vistas Phase I as designed cis the connection of KelcuonWoa Plane to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the iIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekucano'oa Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles durng the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2021 Mr. Joseph ViscOrltl Page. 2 of 4 .Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increosing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7 ,1 of the EA. RogcFding pofenfial traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oo i loce is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and P peak hours, respecfivel�. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Appllcanf claims, "The Proposed Project world not affect public health in any way; storrnwoter would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been toren into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chopter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and 'Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. QgMmgnt $: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 8: The TIAR uses a growth rate eat 11/1, in contrast to the 29d growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in ca non-linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show ars increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Flan forecast projections for 20201 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1% growth rate. Althougli rre are not certain how Witcher Engineering got tin, our traffic engineers L,sec 1 T from the 2025 LRTP forecast. September 13, 2021 Mr. Jr—:=;�h Visconti PCr t Comment 7; The TZAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characterisfics con--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response l: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with ria people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and law -(se and raid -rise was considered. Law -rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very low standard deviation and or) R - squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8: The TIAR employs can unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahumonu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineer'inq Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reparied vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with f=igure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kaohumanu Highw❑y of 7 a.m. The difference In valume is more than double the maximum 10°70 variation generally accepted in day-io-day me❑surernents and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahurnanu Highway section between Ncani Kailua Road and Hual❑l al Road (north). Cour traffic co -int taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDQT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if le -ie Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAL' is uncle oir,ling, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those nr,-)v7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Hv alalai Road f Ncrth,' is inconsistent with the traffic c:ouidor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsIgnalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Koahurnoru Highway and Kuak ni Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project Response 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCDj states, 'The - ec7visfac_.'i ,,n of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require fhe installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and ethers. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR sloes mention where September 13, 2021 Mr. Joseph tiliscOPltl Page 4 of 4 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project_ The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Commerit 10. I am very concerned about the additional traffic on our street and through aur neighborhood from a safety and "noise" perspective. Response 1Q: Impacts to traffic and safety from the project are described in Section 3.7.2 of the EA, and project impacts from noise are described in Section 3.3,5, We sincereiy appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA. please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. r Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. rnichele.lefebvre4 stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Dona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mari, AsM From: Greg Oken <gre9olsep@1earWink.nwt3, Sora: Thursday, October 01, 2020 1-44 PM p �: To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: Greg 015en 5ubjett: Royal Vistas Hauling RrQjeCt EA c:�winents AttachrnQnW Korka Vistas Owners Declaration re Tra#fic.iaclf My narnC is Gre;p 0I,5e;n. I coven and live: at 76.1.58 Kzunchamalu Street, LDT 33. I'm atixuhing my declaration foo usc ai thy; Plwining NVar mcnts' re-,-icw of>bc [loyal ViMas prolicet Mahalo, Circ g Mimi t ;19 5 " 0 !)t'4'I ,�IIT.�4 f 61 E� 1 �I- 1 ilil.� it11'.� �'tl.`•ali�' I. CIRL(it_ kY fel declan€-. 1 . I, am a reMdeni al Kona Vist< .s suhdlvlstan- l OLIntW cal' Hai ki. Si ta: al linvvai-i. Me Trr►11csod land 1cvcl5til11 enl pra:jecl I F1 i,, a? e u11j 1 cit the fvwlia1j; DrAl l'mirY.Nr1m nttll A&-wssmcall sul.miltvd b~, Roy _il Visws Ilousily Project T.~ts Map 1 is , Nov,4. [i N 741-117 T °l116, 7-6-07-1 la 17, 7.( t M' H 18 :1 7..1 7.. 6-U2 H) I(} Nonh i'wcwa Dtgtract. I lawai'i lgland, tit ic. of I Inwai`i c13eels me 4>Er .�n:all4 as �kvh LIS ai&cls inY interest in real l}roperl%. 1 rrside wiillin 5110' C+l thcproowd I,1'1J 11r ;11.rjw- In swhcj?aclticw, I llsw NirsdiDad ktati��wf`tl. ` id Ikc lciliokine i"ick:1114' :LW[d :111(1 ti4.1 Uld [C-AiR LIW''CILI 1I'..'ulli:d UI -011 tai LIO -1'(P. I hay°e r.:yic }wd the p ndIna DItAPT ENVII1C}NME, NT.A-L 4%SSj7SSN1r-. lT including tlic Tral'tic Impact Awlysis f4Fbu,-t b% sSFRI 11�reroalioalai. jawd . vi. -,(i?) anal anached as Appcndix _' 0 Itte DRA17 11- NV IR[1NMI-N I Al - tSSI",,S 'Ct•.N I. 1 aim speciticall� concerned .1bOU14J'Ot tW rrraffic= imp1ac[s boh within and without the Kom Vista:: subdi,I�,iUla that are n -at Billy or jccmdtt'ly Jddf4fti- ped 11111"10 SSI -NI Traffic Impact Analvsis Deport. T'ia9'lii: ,ind the wkl•Ne1 l rr tf, I njl;wl 1 J'%-:pPr1, art discussed In the btwdy tsf tLu DRAFT T-.NVIRCihN%11-',N I..4i ASSI=SWEN'T ai pp 0-56, 67 tmd 71 _ =y M-, ccot74 errs is lltal lwc % ri:_:.l IIIS Ut'R V31 Vi5la -, NAJIO WO -k saputli of l.aku t01 cut up Sunscl Avo to IAIan i tend the:ii procced tv atrik 1, noTI i 1t) Iheir homes in Kcyal Vistas. I:611alli t+1II becnrtle a "Short cast" due to the Iraitic con KnAlni Highvt ,a N at Luko so peopiv r+nilI drke lltr«ugh Swm.wt ani! Kona Villas on from work7,i4lwol Our stn ets were not meant to hantile slut amount oftrul-lic which will wsull in lar riot-+rc tralli; Jrivirtg itic`'trte or. w-sideii ial 7 -mu s Tkii irftTuiII�d 10 hHIIdIe the' Ir`,IItl i ,iIdren ride th,-ir hikes tlw n rhe steer dHvetvays, wenicsrs ivaI1c al+i,r g off Mads. and pear I i. r}:,Ik Lh.ir Cltt, along call th. roads iit' Ko na Fist<i . This behavior hds +LvolvcL.1 micr time siTice our streets are quiet wilh litile rwhhlp Mc volt inc oftruiltc 4an onN rt`suh in a6crx, cortdiLions Ihrouch II)c neighbor', in Krarta iwt s alid i. Irl ihL!, Kcvn Vton% soKlivi_mon, the Crorcised R-Lije t r(+lies on the u cl'a .,O)sL lii,Itrrd ILMLIV ay. K1. LILLn.rva l°Iavv_ 1CekUasnLI'Ca FIRCC is %cr% stvcp" ha.54 limited eight distances dLIV Io extrerne curves and is nam' w vith fist SOL'161AN, T'hc impact Iil' irterLt.,ised Iniflic :u• side iruni Pll:ase I LLIJ Phase _' buil` outs oll` Lha Ro"ol V141w; I loll'+Irl . Proleel is irladequately addro& i in the :ti'.,% .1 I rrtllie: Iu1f. iel Anal sig Rgiun. ti4l601 instead on lmrxicis aldol Qucvcl i{rtalturl.uuiu 1li}!11 ut'. 1 slat I irtie1111irIa c,>�acLnl�:�l thstr arl�tin� nllrl�ersEelY vrl�i�:lt Iril�s Iww "I'd t~r1:10 , sep;ln"vc *subdivisiull will Preset)[ Jul'iyers Wid CollEvs(ii?li to rc'slrlelIts i1I4m�o ibt'ititls na*l.Ki 1'LLv l ci)nNidi,"r that tho 11-mirt}riL O Tximnevil tibould rcquiri the applicAni to .tcidlO4s tlie,�Cca-int:eIlls. 4 'Ne DRAF7T EN. w'IRONME'NT,-kl.ASSESSkIF N l- mcluires L:%,;iluavon of, among MheTI�. (ISA i'd'W tiE'.i"vnr.br1 h1 rpticf.w, ti uc h as porwhifiri l C�ti�,c'.i' rlr on ]!3ithhIC f7c:iir'trf'i `'ycc Ubptcr 1 1-200-1-13. 113"1,11-1 Administrative Rulc4, Instead of s,4txcl} addressing these issue.lvwever. tht DRAFT F;I VIR1?NkIFNVI'AI.:1'��I.*;��ll �J`I' �iatl+I� t�nLxae�tltct�a. e'laLiminy that "V, eftt,et:, Lire k�, Nitetl sincc the %%ould latilize existing. 4&aslvurtur,:, provide infill housivig, and is tint vxTxcted to result Lar t,laslanli�il denianJt to County,y son ico." It i4 n wrious amissiun fOT the DRAI-7 I:NVIRt7'.`wi ENTAL, ASSE'SSMJ'CT to lail lig jddrLnti. t1w rvivrltial ujr ere inirLWLS,.t; irlw<reasing Illi use it' xttht,tartckirel encktirg,nlrx%lruCrLire. like kek-wana t,ja Mace. 5. l`fte 1)f{AF"I E VII ONMEN'YAL AS ESSIMEN'1' addresses adverse traffic uupauLs Unl�• to the ecrnCe.rt ��h'rnhetEier tl�e PFOjml would ihive a ffi-c-t on inthlic henilh_ 'Tlrc A p;slicam claims_ ' Th< l'wI used Pro'ect vwuld not affect public health i11 WIN way. stclrrinwawr would W arpropriately clisposcd ofi.n draii xagQ structures. '['Cole imp-dei� gty_ bccll L L [�.itx �r r FuL. u Jai K��tL� W_[ I'll? 5- ' L` Emphasis d(Id d. This bald L011ClL MOIL ClOV!, nOt F)Otevual iiLEirorse inlpacteti as re4uired byC"Impter 1 11-2M. 1- 1 3. IIalw'ttti. "Will ini" "m6% Rul" fi. 14C PLOUtirtg Deptirttltc:tll Sla(`tsl4l 1101 ,i4'ctpL tJ1c l)RAF f l=NIVIRO?V101--N I N. ASS l., SMIl %4 I"s reI6LIC.ea11Z the SSI,'Ni I,ailie: IniInid ,AvaJ rik Report. which Li-, the follr,wi,3It deliciencieS, t, laillure to addric-ssudverse IrattiC iMPRCts wiLhi-D uh, Kona Vistas sumi vision sr1 1 fic)M the praject: b `I k �QSFM -Traffic Impact F%ir &ltisiw R pQrt uNes a gruNth r.',te of' 1%. ill eunlrast in the err,)%i[, ate emrwlaved by iltc 'til Wi%hcr Eats jnccriag raffic luipmt :lraJvs[N Report. I'rat'tic wn-estion is vei I� 4, tt►I;rxaw1h rate iii a rlttn-Einear. i-Apt*ratntirl relaLiOrt: C. The S,SF1vl Traffic Impact Analysis Rcpfvn dncg roi recowni7C mul1i-PCnCTJ11on3J 11na.rsirar, cliaracaeristi,:s cnrnnion ire E Iawaii according w census data and Iilely undcrestina aws da'cl% veliiele t.rlp-, uxtr°ihulahle in hui1dow r11'tk! prnpo.-.- d larOICIT til. I Ise SSF IO Iraftie Imrmcl Anal%sis Report employs, Ott unusually ltmv vdick vol.um of $53 , ehich:s for Northllx)und Queen Raalmman—o. higl %oN tan the sole-otaed Aate%nl April 30. ?Gilr)_ a week&-. and August 24. 2019. a Saturafiy. com1wed vvillh the 2418 Witchrrr I"Ingineoting, 1 ratl"tc lttrtNcr Analtis,3 Report_ ti%Iiiclt rcported 11151 vehicle's for.lamazy 14 and 15. 21r1t,. hm11 mee1,tlays. l lie IIIIUwuall� loo, r, pmletI wellrtLAC Vk-I Unie i 3 I ,S53 1s itN&P it gilds wv 1,h Figure 4 orthe SSPV Trac"lrc ImP.ta:t Nnalysf_s Report. tikdilch tihove-; approximateh 1091 vr<ltit'les par how- in 2516 i Or Northh,,Ltncl I LWeta KWIL11W11tlsat ,,t ! o I lie alil'iorcilco In Storm+ ix raaOre Olatn dtaul hk Clac maaxMittr" 11)'"';, tatritttirwn Ill Ltl.ti-V'Mary 11"tt%!0II?nIOIIII� Mid tlltli tlS1S'eh01--Plt; +r The recommendation by SSFIvI Traffic Imf)act Analysis Repo •t Ibi a roundabout ;at Qure-11%aahtmiurm lfliVliwa, wr d HULdalai RLlad (Njjtlt) is rieorssi�t4•att m itla 711.' •rtffjc corrtclsrr Inlermc„signs chat pass w:arr,anms 1Xt1 remain t.tnsig-rulizcd present tr.►flit: satto . Itahimi , LcIlIcerra:, Cor the �ovcrntraenl. 1•: Tltc rceotrriricudatiOn h� SSEM TWTlml};act Aatttlws6 Repoil rot tt oniltadug of the intursLv.11 nt A Qttwn KaWiutrtunu 1-Iaghwas) Lod Kuakmi I llghwo% is ua,tdoxi"iv. WIwru. as Isere. tin itm r:ewL mn lls sew move Iliari 41mr to3rr.ant ttptlk;rtll L7nu(iitiotts~ 11 illaualt] % pricaritir.Lc# IM atudv widdu%igtrof u tii�a1�1 lirr ittst:a,ll:atiurt. 'ibis circutrrstituract; wall lx rxaLur�tt4c(l h} tht prc)Pos,+ed prqjtLd. i, Its sunt. the Draft Est%ironmental Asscssmciit and SS FM Traffic Impaci Anullvsi5 Rerom does nn1 presem stafricie•nt_ eredihlc fact -sand malysi3 uch that the ndver w impacts ru't Qxisling inf'rat-trucit,re and r^s.,tahiny, fra}n, iraalfic c;an he fallr ttnd4rsloio l and resaalt 'm appropriate- povernmew planning and reslto ase. I declare under penalm of pcJun- drat the fnroToing is true. a DatLA: KUALa-Kov4. liawall. Oct. 1,201-C. !L)FIA ILI W. Septerr'rber 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsufFing Services hx. P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tek f$QSI 41?4.2039 Mr. Gregory Olsen Via email: grego senCa ear+hli-*.net RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawcal'li Island Dear Mr. Olisen: Thank you for the comment letter dated October t, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DFA} for the proposed project. Blease find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Repan (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I arty specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. t ort meint 2: My concern is that new residents of Royal Vistas who work south of Lako will cut up Sunset Ave. to Leilani and then proceed to drive north to their homes in Royal Vistas. f.eilani will become a "short cut" due to the traffic on Kuckini Highway ct Loko so people will drive through Sunset and Kona Vistas. The volume of traffic can only result in adverse conditions through the neighbors in Kana Vistas and Sunset. Response 2: While it is possible that after Kekucano'oa Place is connected in Phase II of the project. some residents could travel into the project site from the south by turning onto Sunset Avenue, then north on Leiloni Street (or Puolani Street), then east on Lako Street, and then west on Kekuana'oa Place, this would represent the majority of traffic or where backups could occur. This is why the traffic study focused on impacts at the intersections identified in Section 3.7.2 and in Appendix 2 of the EA. Comment 3: In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaaa Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the 71AR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahunnanu Highway. I arra particularly concerned that molding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents Q)� September 13, 2+021 Mr. Gregory Olsen Page. 2 of 4 along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 3: Kekuana'oo Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all other Kona Vistas roads, including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana'oa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana'aa Place to Royal Vistas is net planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuana'oa Place during the AM Peck period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak, period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Comment 4: This DEA requires evaluation ot, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious € mission to fail to address pofenflol adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuono'on Place. Response 4: Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at ❑ different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA.. Rcgcrding potential traffic impacts to KeWono'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 4, for the AM and P peck hours. respectively. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 5: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only fn the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, 'The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way, sformater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Ror► e . S,: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quated is included In Part 5: Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts dletalled and analyzed above in the broody of the EA. Comment b: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TZAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kama Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 6: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local Q)� September 13, 2+021 Mr. Cregcxy Olsen Page. 3 of 4 residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment T: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response 7: Hawaii Departmerf of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 f=ederal Aid Highways Lang Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to come up with the 17, growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used 1% from the 2025 LRTP forecast. Comment 8. The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 8: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, OF be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Trcnsportalion Engineers (ITE) Trip Generatic)n Handbook was used and low-rise grid n -lid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output, This land use has a very low standard deviation and an R - squared value very close to 1.00, so stofisticolly this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. omment 9: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahurmanu highway on the selected dates of April 80, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, Moth weekdays. The unusuolly low reported vehicle volume of 85315 olso at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Koahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the rnaximum 10% varication generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. Res 9: The most recent Historic HDOT count av ailrable irk the study area was the 2016 Queen Kocahumanu Highway section between Noni Kailua Road and Hualcalai Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 H1301 count and was found to be fairly comparable. it is heard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 1Q: The recommendation by the TIAR for ca roundabout of Queen Koahumanu Highway and Hualalai Read (North- is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that press warrants but remain unsigncalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. September 13, 2+021 Mr. Cregcxy Olsen Page. 4 of 4 The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under oll conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response 1D: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states, "The satisfaction of a fraffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are Cather considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geornetric feasibility, and others. The scope cowered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does rnenticn where an intersection may warrant o signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stanfec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. miche le.lefebvreCq"stcantec.corn cc; Richard Wheelock, Kana Three LLC Meaija Jackson, County of Hawol'i Planning Department Mora, Ashley From: Crrmina Visconu<christira_vrscCdst�cglvbal.net, Sent: Riursday. Octaber 01, 21020 6 15 Ph i To: Planning Internet Mall subject: Royal Vistas Housing Project €A comments Attachments: CV Declarallon .pdf Planning. See attached doclaratinn in copposition to Lhe proposed dcvuloptnuriL re-rL-acd tri abOVe. l atix A Cfy i tOII LL ;'I d d1XMI 1headdllluTi l traffic thrutigh our neighborhood, not just the safety issue: but ulacr, iltc IOCt i 001St. The selimol bu., pick ul-V!drop off on our• corne r, Paulehia Surcc & Puapuaatn.i Street is of additional concern zi-it is sorriewhat a blind corner. Thank yLiur for t: asidcring us and our ncigfib ars, Christina Vis itti 7�;-r, 114 1latulchia Street KJ![wi Komi, H[ 90740 ?U.x e 1 It• It '.t I'll t'itiW Illy !'I ti L� rr>rr. t LIO ri°. i -,i%v Iii a,w as r) c- vvrlcl �1%C; [)s) astir IVr yOljr It+kafl . trc M I,LHCJ xia pit• no ni airind- JOHN AZ; 1.36534 DF. I. RATIt air OF 1, CHRISTINA VISCON 11. &c:larc: I urn a residerit cif Paulani Instates (subdivision]. County of Hawai' i, Stale Of l tawni' i. The proposed land dcYclopincut pruj cct Lhat 6, the subject of the pendiq Draft En6ranm onial Assmment :►uhn,itwd by Royal Vistas Nou,',I ng Pro.jeci 1 aK Map Key NosI (3) 7-6.021.-016.7-6-021:017, 7-6 - (1-7 l:fll A. and 7-"2t,019) forth Kana Disirict. Huwai`i Island. State of l lawai'i affcros me personally as ix�cll as affects niy inierest in ival propMt . I reside wizh n I rmilti of the proposed Iand de vel kipiiicr)t pnolect. iii such capaci%os• I hsvt ftrstltiind knowledge ofThc following (;.rcls iind :Lstild and mould le tify therew ifcaRW upon co do tin. 2. 1 have reviewed the pendirtf DRAF 11.'NrVI111),N%,lIIN FA A SLSSM LNT inrrILid Ing the'J ratfic Impat:t AnaIy j" lZ' lJv 11 lby SS1`M I111erI-)atiL}ai.11. dl ited lulv aiIJ attached as Appendix ? to The L)RAH f:t+JVIR(1WI'.111] AL ASSL.SSMW1'. I ,j)c ifically cancemed aura adverse Vrafiic- impacts moth wilhin and w ithout the bona Vistas subdivision that am not filly or acccuratcly addressed in tlx: SSFM Trad=e Impact Anal}psis 1�eport. Traffic and the SSFNI Tnaffic Impact Analysis Rcpori - arcdiscnssed in the herd} ofthe f7RA1:'i ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMN'l. at pp48.56, 67 and 71. 3. In the Duna Vistas suhdiw imon, Itie prepescd praject relies on the use of a subsUindard roadway. Kekwina'ua Place_ Kckuans'oLt I'lace is fiery steep, bw Iirnited sight distances due to extrerit curves and is tlam.+w with no sidewalks. The impaci of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phasc 2 buildouts of the Royal Viatas Hot ing Project is inadequatcly addre-sscd ire the SSI M Traffic Impact Analysis Report-. Khich focus ia.tstcad on impacts along Queen Kaahunianw I _ai r I �Iw l_ jl _v thal udding numerous vehic:lu trips to and from a xparate subdivision will pi s'_•-ew dati=4 rs and congestion to resUerrts alnn�?. Kc:i:uwia'm Place. I consider that the Planning Departmem sWuld require the apprlkaot Lo address the.w uoncet*ns. d. The DRALFT 1.NVIRr)NL%l1�NTAL ASSr5S%iENT requimsevalua6nn of among odwrs, udtvvve xeconefary imp a['ls..vtrc°h as poptdislidni ch^angex ar c#�cu on �ublfc jct� ifire�.ti. See Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Adrninistruthev Rubs. I n:ttcad of 'guard%. addreN,,,ing thc%�, issues., ho%kevcr, the DRAFT E'Iw WRONWNTA L..• WSSMEN I- sirnpl} ignmes Lhv n" claming that "ND AdVtrse secondary effects are r:,peewd since the detieloprnerrt Would u(ilize existing i?ifrtstructure. prx)vide infill humi ng. an8 is not expeclud to result in suhsuntial demands rr. County services." It is a serious ornissice Fay the DR,.,NFT 1 14V IR4:.MENTAL ASSESSMENT. to tail in address th; impacis tEtc use of substandard exiWng infrastnttturc. lilkw; Ki•kL IF1.1'J3 Mace 5. Thu DRAFT ENVIRONMr..NTA1 :�tiSl.���i��l'1° a{ttire:ssex 3clwer,.e rraflic impacts only in the context of whethw the prujw wald 1hive u s21kaun aul ad rry on public, healrh The Applicant cla.irrts. 'The Proposed Proicut would not aff,:ct puhk health in any wa.; stt�rrt�uaWF wd)u1d be appro riaic[w d6poscd of in clrai 1JVC rjflic itrti}yact* 11JVU bem takcri into "re-ful consideranon in proity pit -i n." Fmphasis added. TKs bald conclusion does notaddre}ss poleritial jdvQrE c� irr aatCs as required by Chapter i 1 _`KP.1-I3. Hawaii Admintsiralive Rule -s_ 6. The Man ning Deparrment shouId not accept the D PLAFT FNV1R(,-jN 1I N I AI, ASSES'SMENT"c reliance on the SSf tit Traffic lrrrl•racl Analysis Report, WiWh ha.,, dw li,llo%Ming def cicneics a. [arlurc of address ad%,crse traffic imltct.s within the Kona Vistas subdivision ariising frnrrr the prkiject: h. ]-he SSF-,M Traffic Impact Analysis Deport USC5 a grO VJJT rate 41r I "-o. in contrast to the 2% grci,. qh rate Omployed by the ?fil o W acher 1-tigia�-ering Trraffilk- I rn1iaL: r ,4n:klysis Rcprart,. 1 raCfic congestion is vM nsitivc to gmwth rate~ irr a ron-linear, cxponcntral relariort: C The S'SFM Tranic Impact Analysis kccrrt does nut Mcognix.c gnulii-�wncrational Ito sing characteristics common in Hu%aii acenrd i jig rn C�MSUs Jutcr and IiWy umdcre,�iirnates daily vehicle trips attributable to hui1dotit OfLhc proposed I-►roject: d, the 5S M Iraliic lmpLici AaltlINsi� Rclnari ernploys an tin usual k low %ehit:h: volume of 85.3 vAiclts tur Northhm,nd (fleas Kaahuillanu highway (m ehe selerted dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and Aug.r.r,;t 24. ?t} 19, t watrjrel t} . corlipared %vith the 2019 Viol -Ler I;ngincering Trarffi: Inipact Anal)!,iw kepain. which repcmcd 1057 vQhicles for .lar.Lary 14 and 15, 2016, beth w ct:kLlays. The kill trstralI-V IOW reported Vt hIV lc VOI UMC of 853 is aJsv at odd.R with figurer 4 nifrhe SIM Tratfie Impact Analysis Repnrt. uhi`ll SNOWS aPPrcr,sirretrr:lt' It750 vuhicic-i Icer hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kaahtunanu Highway al 7 am, Fhs. diftereiLLv in volume i9 more than doable The maximum 10% variatkin generally accepted irr clay--to-day measurenwnts and thus unmliahle; e. The recc-mmcndatson by S f M Traffic Imp= Analyiiis Report for a roundabout at Queen [4a.9humanu Ilighway and Hualalai Rtaki (.N(;tlhl is incens. istent with the ttatric 3 �INrrIJ.ii 11k:it pa 4s irl'irriI i t+Lti reri-iarii, uric �o I aI:/vc)ro-,iil ImII-1s' ;:IIL,I INohilII% L:on :wro, liar Eh L` vs. �,kL<rmwrit_ 1 I h� r�l;a+ltlrl-I l:nll�flllil ��� ��I "�1 Iri11i� Irilll•u4t 1r1:11�,i., l���a�r-I ri�r llllsrlitt�r'ir1t' Nit' Illi: INllirst4`l,f4+ll;tit (juk:cit K,l°iliLilTlAnO JOLI KLI;Ik•IIII I llglMiak iv Iliiitl.`illtallL 11trC- an kflitti ,;: i kpa jxvsL*w im1 w` ih.: 11 sine 4% arr 111 and tall contls;l ons. II shoi1l,I b -f pirrilr-iuzod I'Or -A udl and de%i n o1 a signal for 'llri.11�:l1h7r1, I his' 4 tii,111 hr` c xaLcrh:itod h� II!+L prc+rKo4ed prllj L'h. In stIIT>I. r1w I hafi I•.I; Irllr iWT11,11 J'4SI-M I r;iIIii: ITnp4i�I Anal, tisk R. piprl kit"n,�i rwu',cta tiurli6rrii. credihli i'ti t* 311d Mal. Sl.q SM1 111 11 1110 dJ,VrW LHIPlL1, 011 L•tisw inu infraoru4cwro LMLI N:SAIIjJ1,l PrlS311 ir1CrL'd4Cd 13'.i1tIL CA 11 h; liill4 uiidcr�+il pll muP rc,ill1 iri. aall,prupruir plotiurnii1ow INl.11inhilp and rs:,rwn,; . K ! :hrt1 r'cr xi�rl�', r'riL iN1 +664 illL' d4lLlllllhlfal I rall"i 'girl otrij 01tough our iwighhorh,w+d lr-ml ;i ail4 "ri,�i :" 1�trwlsy�'f li'vi 1.. ow I -N! L; 4iihll l llL•ri,ilM L1I pe,rlur� 1hal Ilia 14vegoing IC lrtle S9�3111WT`4":' Printed nlmoic �-1111 � ` �I � r '� �r � �N �•f � j � t � � f Septerr'rber 1.3, 2021 Stantec Consulaing Services ani. P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Ms. Christina Visconti 75-6104 Paulehia Street Kallua Kona, Hl 96740 Via email: chrlstina vise sb: globe l.nPt RE: Comment's on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona € istrict, Hawa€'f Island Dear Ms. Visconti: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 1, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pendir)g Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impocts are discussed below. Comment 2:: `I,e Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a sup, standard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and Is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising tram Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TZAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kanhurnanu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanacaa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuana'oo Place is a County -owned road built to County 5tandords. with the some specifications as all other Kona Vistas roads, including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana'oo Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana`aa Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 202?. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuana'aa Place during the AM Peale period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Perak perked. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekucano'oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2+021 Ms, Chris4lrn Visconti Pcge. 2 of 4 .Comment: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is ca serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuanca`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7 ,1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana `oa Place. the number of vehicles projected to use Kekouna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and P peak hours, respectively. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The IIIA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substontial adverse effect on public health. The Appiicont claims, „The Proposed Project world not affect public health in any way; sformwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been takers into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added, This bold conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. QgMmgnt ;a: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a growth rate at 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TZAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a neon -linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Longe Range Transportation Flan forecast projections for 20201 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1% growth rate. Alfhough we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got tin, our traffic engineers used 1 from the 2025 LRTP forecast. September 13, 2+021 Ms, Christina Visconti Comment 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics con--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestinnates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. ftesoonse 1. It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and raid -rise was considered. Law -rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher valurne output. This land use has a very low standard deviation and or) R - squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8. The TIAR employs can unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahur-nanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repol 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for january 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with figure 4 of the TIAL, which shows approximately 1060 vehicles per hour in 201$ for Morthbound Queen Koahurmanu Highway ❑t 7 a.m. The difference In volume is more than double the maximum 1 0 variation generally accepted in day-to-day meosurernenfs and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDQT count ❑voilable in the study creo was the 2016 Queen Koahurnanu Highway section between Nani Kailuo Road and Huololoi Road (north). Cour traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is uncles r�._r'lir� but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those nr,_)v7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 9: The recommendations by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queer Kaah�;maru Highway and Hualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor, lnterse4tians that pass warrants but rernaIn unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Koahurnanu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate, Where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCD� states, ,The sc_visfcac_!,,n of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal,'' There are other considerations that need to be done before Installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and ethers. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis, The TIAL dries mention where September 13, 2+021 Ms, Chris4irn Visconti Pcge. 4 of 4 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Comment 10: b am very concerned about the additional traffic on our street and through our neighborhood from a safety and "noise" perspective. Response 10: Impacts to traffic and safety from the project are described in Section 3.7.2 of the EA, and project impacts from noise are described in Section 3.3,5, We sincereiy appreciate your review of the document. If you have any cdditional comments or questions about the EA. please contact me at (806) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. r Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre4 stanfec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashle From Ra6ert Harns «obh.h:arreF�'grr:ail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2020 5 19 AM To: Planning Internet mail Subject: Royal Visias Housing Project EA comments Atlochments: Declaration Of Traffic Cuncern;.pdf; Declaration Of Drainage Corxerns pd#; DL5claratiori CI Archaeological Concerns-pcif Altrlta. I have attac:hmi thrct: (lucla mt6)n troncems for this project, 1 havC a1s0 altaChLA U lettVF !u tete c Cduation of trafri 4tw cern. Mahaku for your time to ; considl :r my vont =s. With Aloha, ( chert I i [hirw; 76-4323 kuktLaii 4.3 Kiailua K t m.t. I I I 1-a32 ,r DECLARATION OI, is fiat k:f. C7`r�al t 3 I , 1 am za residuni of [ -. 1' x - '.� / Komi Vi: Yws `auWivisionj, Cottttyof Hawaii. State of Ilawai'i. Me prcpaseA laad dc"bopnaenl prgiL:L t that is tbC Subject € f the pending Draft FnviTunrrikv. 1al Azxst Mment suhniitted by Rovail Vistas 1-lc,a. ing Prujecl Tax Map Key Nol i;lil 7.6-021.016. 7.6- tij'I:nl 7. 7-6-().11:01 S. marl 7-6.02 1:1)1 � Noilk Kona Di itrict, Hawvd'i L3lond. Siatecat`Haawai'i affects tate• personally as wc11 us raffccts my intemst in real eM D[)CTIN l ae.ridC within C ' [distance:] of the proposed la„il dcw1lofan'10111 pro,liic1. In witch capaciaes, I have: fuxthand kna wledge ul tho rollwA iug focts and coald and would t�:ktify thetelo if esll�A ttlxm to do -.ka _'. l have 3't:%'Ivwwd thu pending DRAFT ENV I1 ULNI MEN'I AL ASSESS.Vt I' including, [lie Tnffl(: lir ppJCt Arinlys;s Report by SSFM Into rrtatii,ntsl, dawd Ady 2070 arrtel ;atut;hed tws Appenku, 2 to Iliv DRAFT ENN IRUNMEI" IAL ASSESSMENT. l wi sprint ;ally concemed athout 2dvene trsflac rtttpaets bath %,,Ahni and without the: Kona V ism."; subtilvision thal aaru nut fully ur aUcwrr Rely ateldTuisGd in thu SSI'M FraffiC 1111Faet An a,vsi% Repot L. 1 fufrw and the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Repow aan� diacussod inti the body L4 the DRAFT t I' IRO*,4Vi NTAi_ ASSESSMENT, at pp 4S-56, +i7 and 71. 3 In the Ken a Vistas subdivision, Oe pToposed project Belie; (iii rhe use v ra sLibstatxdard raadwaay. Kekuxia'oat Place. Kekuaaa%,a Place is very steep. has limited sight distatices dere tip erxtreme curves UDd is tiflrrow kvith tw sidvwaalks, 'Ili; irnpa;tct of utt.-reased traffic arising from Pbaw I aspl Phase 2 buildouts of thi:Ianyal Vistas Housing Project 15 illadcqudtely addax -.sed in die S9PA Traflic Impar, Analysis Report, whir.h Ioutzscw anstcatt on itnitac.ts al0tig, QM!en Kaaliumnnu Hi�.lwvny. I .7m particularly concerned that adding rtumerau5 vchkic trips lea aud f,-Cnr a sc;lt,ra-ate subdixislon will presont darigm raid congcstion to residents alanv, Ko�uwi.rv.- f i:icc, I carni der ilist the i'Iaa,r►t„g DCJ)LttiilNeill Should require the ilpplic-LlrK[ to -addres-s these amcems 4. Tlw DRAFT ENI VIRON"MENTi'AL ASSFSS ENT rrquires ewall.25 aaz ill'. .1111011g othvI-w, uffverae.Se^c�rartdar.v tmpacci, yooc t ox palwola?iopr changes or e7ff c°ts an lrtibafcjizc°r?nits. gee ChE3nter l 1-700.1-13, 1lnwaii Adminigtratrve Rules, Instead Of %4"L44' addi-msin�, the ,7iwt�G` howavct,111G� IiI Ak 11-IMl1tONMEN'I"AL ASSt?,S:SMENT simply lgnorcw tl,k�,ir_ claiming that "Ne advcrse secordairy effects are expecred since the development r&«uld tttilve existing anfrastaztcturC. provide infill 170using, and is nut eacpeuttA to result uz sa.tbstantial dema ndi to County s c m i s." II au ,a i%J1011S 0151w41„t'.. 100 th,: ORAFT ENV IRON, M H.N] AL ASSIySSMLN I ick tail to address the patenrial advvw impacts ofincrcasing thr uxc cit subAundarcl exi ting Nntrastructuar,:, lake Kckuana'ua I'lacc. I TI -w DRAY F,NVIRC�i�lb FNTAL AS,SF,S�SMFN'rmitire;�.ws .tris t rse trar�ic o,rp;,i.t, c,cx1Y i€, Ilt�:. ct�nte tt v'fwlt thcr tltie grc�jcct ►vo�alci flute c� .xrf(>> rrfxlrWl crt }, r,3�* &cvri p0ih- hece1ffo The Applicant claims, "Thc. PmrA3awci Pro-ject would: inct affect pubtir health in any way; slurnlwatcr would lac apprupylawly dTstnisut! of tax dMinage structures. Traffic im]2u;;us have been taken into careful consideration in proleol resign.” Emphasis added- This bald conclusion does net address potential advenze impacts as required by Chaptcr 1 1 �ttti_ 1 0, Hawaii Advllnll lraltve Kaiec, 6. The Planning Dcparttmeni should not accept the DRAPE E;NVIRC)NN11~iNTA L ASSESSMENT`,, feliance on the SUN1 TrR is Emrmct Analysis Kepori, which has the Follow,rig delic:ieawie&' a Eaihire to ad€iivss adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vl.sus stahtiiviAort arising, frmn the proje-t: b. -Die S5FM Tra#iic Impact Aualysis Report uses a &rowih t ie of 1 %, itt eotitra.st to the 2114 giniwiit raft cutpluyed by the 2019 WiLL'hm Ft►ginc:er ing Traffic Impact .Arwlys'is RCPL)rt. 'I raffic ccingesliun is very san,im c co grnwt h mite in a nuri-lin+:asx, wxPt"-tiertiital 1L:latiu11; C. flu tiNPA Traffic Impact Analysis Rgxrt dooi norrecognizc multi-gmwmtional housmg charactcristics common in flawaii accordhig to census dila and )kvly WlldertirsLimart" duily vt hido trips uttributahlc it) buildout of the proposed pi-ol ct, d. Chc SSFM Traffic Impaci Analysis kepnrt eripInys a kin tttitmlIy It,w vC4ir:lc. volitmc of q53 vchicics R -or NL)rthhound Queoi Kaahumarm highway oTi ane stlLcLed tliiIL-.% ail April 10, 20 IS, a weekday incl ,Atigust 24, 20N, i Swan ay, ioriipcued with the 20141 '+ il-d1 t PrLgineeving Traffic limpaet Atialyxn, tllcrwrt, vehich relxmtcd 1057 tivhirles Fnr Ja nunry 14 an[i. 1 i. 201 A, berth i t;r.kd'L)-w The IIIItLItI AIY ILIW tt'pL.}rLt.tl % e IICle +OI' I FIC at1' 951 1% :11 41 at titicts ti4'A Figure 4 of the SSFNI Tti Me Impact Analysk R��J)0rt, whieh 4zho%vs approxi riiaielv 1050 Yell IcIts per hour in 2016 for': urthbuutnd Queers KaillLIMHIILL Highway ai 7 nl.rn. The di erenee in voIane is more thais double the max I(J",,,a van all nn getieniIly aaeepted i11 clay -to -day mea.sitrewents acid thus ttn.rtiiable. e. The r�xommendati€m by SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report for a rcundabLiui at Quccr Kaahtt.mana I Iighmay and Hualalai Road (NomhI is mconsisteni with Ehe traflic 3 ccsrridor. InTerrections that flaw, warrar,rs brit renlairr prr!,Cnt imI lic ::alcty Iinbiiity concem-, for thr: goverrimci t; f 71'le TVC.OnInIcrrclarion by SSFNI r lJrc. Lupxcl Analysis Rgwvt JW knolEsrixiag Of III . inter°,+CCTior. AQticerl Kaaliumanu Highway :rind KLia 16 Highxiry I�- W dL-Llu:�!0. l4'lr�ar�•, as here, art inter ec°rnn pa,;tiew L11cn-c dean unc Nr`WTMII undtir rail �V11driruitZ�. it 611 UIJ l,� prioritized for shady and c xigrt ofI Signal for i:r;6-al I iticr,t. Thi; w:r;cuLrisrarrce uriII be exacerbated by the nrr}lwwd project. 7. Iry .111u, tliC I -M—r I ri L,,,,sn)62L r ;oiid NSr It1 I i iffic hnpukrl ,Acs;dy�i, Rcporl dck:s ow prescnl mfticient, crodiblc Cacxa and analysis strcr: hat rile :s;Ivcrs� iu 1pucl�- carp exioing rnfrasIT-ucture and rcstilt ng from inc=scd ITar# c c,an Mk hilly rrnticrst4,od ;incl rosuh in arppRipriale 80VL:rnLocrit planning aril Iutip itw4. ii;XILrru Ulldzf (Malty %)FlVrjtxry diet the forcgoing is true:: Dated_ K2i1ua-itirrrra, Ilawai`i, Cd 406<y4 ! ,20211, i �;n�tturr; Fr nUO name: Lis tom' 4 fl- &'-� I 4.1 �. rictokr 1, a).Zu RE: Royal VlStaS Housing F'fraje=t Aloha, My unite, Bonn,p, asrsl 1 have livers in Kona Vistas Subdkiislon tar aver two year's, We very much enjoy Dur home and look forward too many rnwe years of ertjoyrrter;. Our ha.me is located on Kekuanaoa Place wtrch currently 15 the on$y access to Riayal Vistas Huusing Prciject speclfied on the Royal Vi%LdS' plans. tin,+hien 'me purchasea aur lot almost tour years agcy, we were not infurrrred of this project or 'Kekuanaoa Place as helm the crily access to the Royal Vistas Hau5irig Prajiect Thr Royal Vistas Housing Project owner presented to Kona Vi5t.is' o w )ers their plans for the IRcyal Vistas Hous;n?, PrOJOLI Arid what h would Icok like, They had pfDP05ed LWO EP'frdl'ncr_lexlt5tOIIII 9r project from Kaatia Vistas ano two entrance!exits frurta a xuOdiwi5lov, vii time rel proj t, Pualani Estates. Or,,L4 at the ,accesses From Korea Vistas. not KekLianaQa 1*1ace, requires permir„+an from Ihe owner of the property for access the Royal Vi5ta5 which has been denled by the awner from my undier5l4ti(firig. MSG, the two arces'ses from fairalani Estates requires Ro gal Vii -tai tet be. granted access acroSS a strip of land owned by another owner who has also denied Royal Vistas joxR %s to t:hek pruleit fruilk my undk:rstandiag. This only leaves Kekuanaoa ;I a:e irk Kuria VIStaS a5 tla+L- only access to Royal VlgtalS Housing Project. SiiiLt Queers K Highway i5 arsiacent to Royal Vistas. Hciusing Project there siiauld bre access frc}m rhla hightiwase anis nor from Kona V5stas Subdivision. iKnria Vitas only acct=s is tram Queen K Highitiway by Lako ra, for,3_ir sundivision wCth 2CO homesites and Lwo utltcr Whdivi�iura3, Royal Vistas Hoasirill; Pria]CN ig %l i otl ':u 4gci he —nes (Condo'., some rerital units and sorne lacVchased units) if Kana Vistas has 0111y or'r? .3c( e" tr-, its subdivision. why shouldn't Royal Vistas only access be Queer~ K highway as well. s,,L)o r1 Kayal VistaS have an wess thrtaugh KenaVistas amd allow all their tratIrr, inclocilirg the conStruction egirlprnent traffic over the next 20 years of their development, to drive rhwroLgh Kona Vistas Subdivision? Royal Vistas housing Project wlth 490 units has almost 2.5 times larger oerlsity and hits traffic should not he funneled through Kona Vistas 5utl visinn via Kekuariaca Place or any other street. Mahalo for yawn time, Robert D. Harris 76.432.3 Keicuartaoa Place DECLARATION OF �".!i I am a restdew of kora V1cta5 subdIVIsion, COUtxty t1f HaWai`i, Staie Of HaWai`i. I'll Z prc7p+1.5cd land dcvclnprncnt prvjcc[ that I thG Sula]cct A iitr: pe:itding Uraii Lnk tit -a xnlaI e;,�riient 4t i bwLtteiL by Rcryal sista FlnuSin i'rnject Tax Map I{cy leas. �; "-b- 131.1:017, 7-6.021:0lkand 7-6.021:01.9 North Kona District. Hawai'ilslttntl, S:. its- Ff` ' ,Iffccts me PeNionally as wall as af'tccts nky it ereht in rr:atl prupwy, I ru.,iid xv� Iii - 1 t r c [di t incel of They proposmi (aavei devetnpment project. 111 such have titsth=d lino ledgo ofthe W lowing thcts and could and would testft th(;rcto if called upon to do So. I have rrwiewcd the pending C]iiA I k•NVlRONW:N l AL A+lSESS.WN"i and Ittachill;nis, l aatl speeitically Concemed about: 3. 10 enol consider that the arcbact logical srudicw offcrcd in "33pporl ref the l hall Envu°oati%ntal AsSemmcnt art adquate. Sce pp. therent. 4. 1 am aware that suk,vantia.l evidence oxists that the lama encompassed by the svbjuct laird paxrccls includes features of the Holualoa Slide. including rock walls that art? inadce wdely described its auuict1wal walls M th4 stLidIk:� oi7vsW iu aur Volt of the Draft frrvirrrrrrnewal A iessment Thr, Halualoa Slirlt IN an iinywrtatu Hawaii= r;r}ltulal and archaeological rcature from pre -W tem c(txtatct tisti" tlw. vainiol Ix rwpditcod if da1rtagcd or deAruyecL 5. 1 ltizt,,e II V eutv=rtts upon lltr: c�vaIaafiva and atwIysis pert•umied by rutit i w,aku 1 Stone, i� copy of which is attached. #i_ in sum, Lhe Draft F.nvircwmiemal Assessment does not discuss sui%cim facts and analy,qissuch thal the i rnpc rtattt Haw.t ' an cultural anti archaeological fcatums can be uliilL'rutood. let alune 7. Al a ir,.n;-nuir. a.l-.: 1)rii f` .°7Wi-vii menial Assemsment Must be revised to address the location, data recovery and pre xrvatiun chhe liclualoia Slide 4:Qmponeats print ren the Ulbj t p-wcels, 1 JOCLsrr Wider penally gal' perjury Ilraat The faiegoing is true. 11tte . hallus ->Kona, Hawai" i, CdoL l u L_,2()10 igtmturc: PriitW rwim.- 2 DECLARATION QF_]) an, a res3dertt s.�f E:on1l'iwititi wetl7cliwY�l�rn, Courity 4Hawai'i, Strtte+rt'Ifawai`i. The proposed land de%elt,ptrtettt prai x I tl; -U. is the suh;cct o I h Q pending Draft 1; nvirow CntaI As.wssmetxt subinitie d by Loyal Vistas Housing Project Tax Map Key No%. 11 J 7-6-62106, 7-6- 07-1 '0 17. -6-071'017. 7-6,021-1118, and 741-(021 -019 1+.oifir !Cana District, Hawai'i Island. State. cl'Hawui,i arfoctrs me porwrrnlly as well as afTects ,ny intcrest in real property. I reside with Ln --J C.C` C V-1 [distttnco] (if II1C proposed land &wlopmt .-nt project. In such capacitios. I haves firsthand krlram,Iedgc v the ro11,,wIirg Eaeetr and cxsttlel and would tem m!% rhei-eto Illed upon to do so I h.r■,o I`c!ti'14`4ked th(i ivlldino, Lt1{.'11' l ENVIRONllriENTAL ASSl:SSN1i-N l' urkd +iC,rchnrents l i�1a� I��.ifil.Illy w�1:1•,4'�I,,.'t1 clt�s�,r! „1wr�►►-' , -e 1 `'-k 4;-;A4?f, .mac 3. nit: stop topography, historical t.ipid .r"tomiwatrr darn;ii * prr seal ltarrrtl�t thatarr~ ntrtsrciccpratcly a.ltilr w ��i iii I'' 1lr ft r»v:r+7JYlY�clkla r"4aseo5llletil, SC,: PR I I Lak:Of. aen aware that [cite spec 1fic Facts] 5. In sure, the Drafi Env[ronmentaf A,;gcsrtrrcnt does ncrt discuss su#Tci`Ynt facts and arttrlv-,a% much that the nceessary di-airlage inIpMvemucts acrd diversions can he undorslaLw-L A properenvironimntal assessment cannot leave meaningful dctui6 tc 1?l• takezt cum of in the future As I unciewand it- such ci CLIMst:><nces would lead to unlawful project segmentartiun, am,vg other etrors. 1 h A bate C0416 "ion by the applicant or accepting ttcthority that needed Infrastn«lure will Conaply Whit VjVj:MnW'tts MORIlDtta Is"sufficieut_ At a miyurmim, tate Ural) Envitosrt„ental Asswssment must bc wviscd to sh+nw spe6lec:ally w1laat lnfraemtcturc i,,, seati etraeruy aa•e a'eatlirMil to tie into the C OUrnty's d7 inaage system and t:ow zhnse intip -ow- cnis will Function. I der. lare! under penalty ofperjury 11 IM LIW firming is inLe. Signature. hill V`) Plan ic;: �t oe11 &J t` - + t-� ra�rl � l 'r September 13, 2021 Stantec Consulting services lnc. P.O. Bax 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tel: (SOS) 494-2039 Mr. Robert Harris 76-4323 Kekuana'oa Place Kailua-Kona, HI 967 0 Via email: bobh,home," gmail.com RE: Comments on Drainage Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawal'E Island Dear Mr_ Harris: Thank you faf the comment letter dated October 1, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: I have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TZAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 2: In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of fhe proposed project is inadequotely addressed in the TIARr which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahurnaru Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuonaoo Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuana'oa Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all other Kana Vistas roads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana'oa Place front Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana'oa Place to Loyal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. later that, once fall build -cut is completed, the TIAL estirrrates a tectal of 30 cdditlonal vehicles on Kekuano'aa Place during the AM Peale period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2021 Mr. Robert Harris Pope 2 of 7 Commenf 3: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects an public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA. ignores them. It is a serious ornissicn to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing Infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response 3: Secondary effects are Indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects ore not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for an -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana `4o Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase ll outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and PM peak hours, respectively). The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3,7.2 of the EA). Comnment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, "The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; stormwoter would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed nbove in the body of the EA. Comment : The Planning Department should not accept the DEA"s reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Responses 5: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably strap controlled and have only local residential traffic, Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. t;ammernt 6: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2` growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TTIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Deportment of Transportation (HIDQT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lang Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1 growth rate. Although we are not certain haw Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used I% from the 2025 LRTP forecast. 41 September 13, 2021 Mr. Robert Harris Pa e. 3 of 7 Commenf 7: The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle Mips atfributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response -7: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with tour cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers SITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and mid -rise way considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output, This land use has a very law standard deviation and on R squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Ccmmenf 8: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahurn anu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 W[tcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for J anuary 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reperted vehicle valume of 853 is ciliio at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum I A variation generally accepted in day-to-doy measurements and thus unreliable. Response 8: The most recent Historic HDOT count ovoiloble in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kaahumanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Road and Hualalai Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDOT count and was found to be foirly comoca cable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounfing, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project dues use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. C:pmmenf} 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that puss warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahurnanu Highway sand Kuakini Highway is inadequate. where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design cf a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCID) states, ,The satisfaction of a traffic signcl warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal,'' There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and others. The scrape covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where September 13, 2021 Mr. Robert Harris Page 4 of 7 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Commenf 10: Cour home is located on Kekuancaoa Place which currently is the only access to Royal Vistas Housing Project specified on the Royal Vistas` plans. When we purchased our lot almost four years sago we were not informed of this project or Kekuanaoc Place as being the only access to the Royal Vistas Housing Project. Response 10: The project would be accessed in two different ways. As described in Section 3.7.2 of the EA. Kana Three LLC proposes to construct ca new intersection. Royal Vistas Roadway at the project's intersection with Queen Ko'ahumanu. The second access point would be from Kekuano'ca Place, which would not occur until Phrase II of the project. Figure 2 has been revised to show that access to the project site would be connected to Kekuonc`oca Place from Laky Street during Phase II of the project. At project completion, there would be two ways to access the project. Ccmmenf 11: The Royal Vistas Housing Project owner presented to Kana Vistas' owners their plans for the Royol Vistas Dousing Project and what it would look like. They had proposed two entrance/exits to their project from Kana Vistas and two entrance/exits from to subdivision on the north side of their project, Pualani Estates. One of the accesses from Kona Vistas, not Kekuranaoca Place, requires permission from the owner of the property for access the Royal Vistas which has been denied by the owner from my understanding. Also, the two rccesses from Pualoni Estates requires Royal Vistas to be granted access across a strip of land awned by another owner who has also denied Royal Vistas access to their project frorn may understanding. This only ieaves Kekuanaoa Place in Kona Vistas as the only access to Royal Vistas Housing Project. Response 11: The plans for access into the development have evolved over time .based on discussions with various stakeholders; Section 2.3 of the EA describes how access from Pualani Estates from Poulehio Street was on alternative considered but eliminated from detailed analysis. The project as described in Section 1.2 and analyzed in this EA for approval presents two access poinfs for the project, from o new intersection (Rayol Vistas Roadway at the prr:ject's intersection with ween Ko'ahumanuj in Phase I and from Kekuana'oa Place in Phase 11. Comment 12: Since Queen K Highway is adjacent to Royal Vistas Housing Project there should be access from this highway and not from Kona Vistas Subdivision. Kana Vistas only access is from Queen K Highway by Lcako Street for our subdivision with 2D0 homesites. Response 12: A small number of 'left turn out' (southbound) vehicles will be pushed through Kekauna'oa Place and Lakes Street. For emergency reasons, it would be beneficial if more than one access is provided to any development. September 13, 2021 Mr. Robert Harris Poe. 5 of 7 The master pian for this area shows connector streets parallel to Queen Kc'ahumanu Highwoy through these developments to purposely provide connectivity redundant to Queen Kc'ahumanu Highway. This is not a new or recent concept in the area. Comment 13: 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment and attachir eats, I am specificclly concerned about the Hnivaloo Slide rockwall being damaged. I do not consider that the archaeological studies in support of the DEA are adequate. I am aware that substantial evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject parcels includes features of the Holuailoa Aide, including rack walls that are inadequately described as agricultu.,al walls in the orchaeological studies offered in support of the GEA. The Holualoo Slide is or important Hawaiian cultural and o*chaeological feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if damaged or desiroyed. Resoanse 13: As described in Section 3,6 and included in Appendix 5 of the EA, two Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) reports were prepared for the project. As part of the AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evQluated for their significance. The AISs were conducted following Hawaii Administrative Rules §13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sites were considered significant under criterion d because of the information that was learned during the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs ensures that their information is not lost. The documentation drone was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. Regarding the rock walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 24211 ) documented. This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the rernoins of a holua, Also, the walls were 1.0 meter in height and is similar in constructed to similar historic era rack walls constructed along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of a Land Commission Award (LCA) #(3660. Addifionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the some gulch. It is unlikely that this is a hdlua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. No holua slide has been identified in the project site. Commend 14: 1 base my concerns upon the evaluation performed by Tom Pohaku Stone, a copy of which is attached. The DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological features can be understood let alone properly preserved. The IAEA must be revised to address the locction, dates recovery and preservation of the Holualoa Slide components present on the subject parcels. September 13, 2021 Mr. Robert Harris Page 6 of 7 Response 14: In the email provided. there is reference to "the portion of the holua at the Holua inn [that] has rock walls on moth sides" and refers to parallel walls within the proposed development area, possibly Site 31182 Feature 2 and Feature 3 walls which are LCA #3660 boundary walls, Primarily, Mr. Stone's email responses provide accurate information concerning the cultural irnportance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the near -coastal region between Kailua to the north and Keauhou to the south. The remains of many of these complexes were first mapped by Henry Kckahuna. Mr. Stone correctly states the religious and social importance of he'ehblua and its connection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures along the coast and in the near coastal region. However, the complexes are located more than 1.0 km west of the project area and there erre no remains of royal, sacred or sociopolitical complexes, or a h6lua, within the project area. The existence sof a halua within the project area is not asserted by her. Stone. As discussed above, there is no documented oral history, archival documentation, or orchoeologicol evidence to suggest o holuca course existed within the project area. C_omment.___15: I have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment and attachments. I am specifically concerned about drainage interruptions. Response 15: Section 1.2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the two Courily-awned parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify that on TMK (3) 7-6-21:19, "Infrastructure during Phase ll of the Proposes! Project includes installation of a culvert system along with utilities and roadway across the ditch to extend Kekuana'oa Street, which would then be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the Kana Community Development Plan's (CDP's) "Official Transportation Map." For TMK (3) 7-6-21:18, the project includes infrastructure for channelizing a portion of this ditch and includes a read and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the Kona CDP's "Official Transportation Map." Figure 2 has leen revised in the Final EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages in the Project Area. Additionally, the text in Section 3.3.2 describes that Kona Three would prepare a Drainage Plan to ensure that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by Deportment of Public Warks, and there would be no drainage interruptions. Comment 16: The steep topography, historical rapid storm Ater run-off and associated domag e present hazards fhat are not adequately addressed in the Draft Environmental Assessment. I am a,,va : ti -it this project will have serious impact on the immediate and surrounding crew. September 13, 2021 Mr. Robert Harris Page. 7 of 7 Response 16: Kona Three LLC is not aware of any damage to adjoining properties, including Queen Ko'chumanu Highway, from water flowing from the subject property. Comment 17: The DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood. A proper environmental cssessment cannot leave meaningful deiails to be taken care of in the future, As I understand it, such circumstances would lead to unlawful protect segmentation among other errors. Response 17: There is no project segmeniation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Comment 18: A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastructure will comply with government regulations is insufficient. At a minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must be revised to show specifically what infrastructure improvements --re required to tie into the County's drainage system and how those improvements will function. Response 18: The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design of the onsite Drainage plan would be identitied at a Later date, the potential impacts from their construction are analyzed. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additlonol comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvrestantec.corn cc: Richard Wheelock, Kana Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawci`i Planning Department +, CU11 PLIRNNIt+Ci DEPT i October 3. 2020 Planning Depadment County of Hawaii 74-SOM Ane Keahaialole Highway Bldg E KaHuia Kona, HI 95740 ME: !ROYAL VISTA Housing Project EA Comments Gear Planning 117"rtrner;t C)fficials:. I am suhmltting to you my comments regarding the Royal Vista Housing Proj-ect F.A. l am oppospd to the project as Itis currentiv iaroposnd. Myr husband' and I are full time residents of N,awaii avi I navp attached my comments regarding the EA, Further, Ifully concur with the detailed camrrent5 that hove taeen submitted * the Kara Vista Homeowrwr8 Assotlatinn and Board Sirlcerefy " / r#oa4aret Donnellan Tedd 7G-151 Karneharnaii Kailua Kona. HI 96740 nn�a );PS, ME 562 879-0546{reifN 11h5`.101 n k'CU[1 CCH P1_fl!'JJ1N(; DEPT GC 1 1? '20 1:x,:01' Y [,If VN 1.' i_0- I TUE RED DE .R.kT]QN OF 1, MARGARET D[ NNELLAN TODD, dcr-lare: i : I aiaa a TL:Sidrrrt of 7h-1151 Kanwharnalu St, Kai luau lona 1 Kona Vistas sub�livisiort], County of Hatwai'i, State of I lawal`i. The proposed lwW development project that is the subject of"the petadia g Draft Environmental Asswssmwra submirtL:d by Royal V islas Housing; Project Tux Map Key Nos (',)7-b-02 l :016, 7-6-421:017, 7-6_02 1.018, and 7-6_021.019 North Kona District, Rawa.i`i ]slam#, State of Hawaii afFecis me pemaniflIv as well as affects my interest in real property. I reside witNn approximately° [w+o b" -s oram boundaries of the proposed land ckvc1opment project, Ire such capacities, 1 Mve fir t.kand knowicdge of the following fiar_is and could and would tewlry thereto ifcal;w upon to do so. 2. 1 have reviewed the peWing DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report by SSFNI Internaational. dated 9►aly 2020 arli attached as Appendix 2 to the DR -AFT CINIV'IR[]NYc°fENTAL ASSESSMENT. I am sJscificilly concemcd about adverse traffic irnpacts both within acrd witlwui the Kana Visna S .SUbdiv ision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the SSUNI 1'raf is Impact Analysis Report_ Traffic rind the SUM Traffic Impact Analysis Report. arc discussed in the body of the L" IUVT ENV IRC]NMEN TAtL. ASSESSMENT. at pp. 48-56, 57 and 71. 1 am al so eoneemed rhai the mitigations for ingressiegres5 in emergency situations is inadequste. 3. In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the pto po sed project relies ora the use Of a sub,iaradard root way, Kekuana'oa Place, Kcku=a`aa Place is very steep, has fiiraited sight distances due to extrenx curves rand iw narrtow° with nu ,,I&walks. The iratipact Of increased traffic arisins from Phase I and Phase 2 buildoutsof elle Rovu1 Visus Rousing Project is inadequately addcesscd in the SSFM Trafl.ic Impoel Ana]yNis Report, which focuses inskead on imllacts along Queen Kaahurnanu Highway- I am particularly ronc:rned that adding numerous vehicle nips to and from a separate sthdivision will present dangers quid congestion to residents along Kckuuam'oa Place. I consider that the Planning Deprartmcstt should requife Lhe applicant to addre-iq these concerns. 4. The DRAF7 ENVIRONlw-EWAL ASSESSL14ENT requires evaluation of, among, ethers, adverse secandary impacts, such as rx)P1d1g09a Changes or effects On public facil ries. get Chapter 11 -200.1-1}, Hawaii Administrative Rulc. Instead of squarely addressing the k)wever, the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS'IENT simply ignores there, churning that "No adverse secortciaq effects are expected since the development would trlilize existing infrsstr ochre, lrrovide infill housing, uW its not expected to result in substantial dernan& to County services." It is a serious omission For Lhe DRAFT FFNV IRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT to fail to addrm the potential adverse irapacks crf lacreasing the use of wbl 4andaHl existing infrastrttcnrre, like Kekuana`oa Place. 5. 1 -he DRALFF FNVIRON[4�il NTAL AS S E SSNIENT addresses adverse: tra#lic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a subsPantial adverse effecr 6m puhhe health. The Applicant claims, "Mc Proposed Project wcold not affect public heath in any way-. stormwater would be appTooately disposed of in drainage strictures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful-carrsi ,gl'Abg)n in j2rolccC�" EMph sis added. This hRld I conciusiork does not address potential adverse Impacts as required by Chapter 1 1-° 00,1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules, fr. The Planning Department should not =ept [he DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESS MEN-rs reliance an the SSFM TrafFc Impart .Analysis Report, which bas the following deficiencies: 3. raitore tv address advcrse traffic impacts %1 hi the trona Vistas subdivision arising d'Torn the project;. b. I'hc SSFIVI TraFitis Impact ArWysis Report uses a gmwwth mic of m in contrast to the 2% grOA1h rate crnpioyed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering Tral is Impact .Analysis Report. Traffic cnngc: Con is verb sensitive 1n growd-, rd�e in it noir-lrocw, ;;xponcatia.l relatinn; C. The SSFM Trdffiie Impact Analysis Rupert does not recogni= multi-,gcneralionaI housing eharacteristic..9 ccrrnmon in Ha Aaii according IBJ census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributuble to buildout of the proroscd project; d. The SSFM Traffic- Impact Analysis Raffr1 employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 953 vehicles for Northbownd Queen Kaaahurnanu highway on the selected dales or April 30, 2019, a weekday and ,August 24, 2419, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repom which reported 1457 vehicles for January 14 and 15# 2016, both weckday,: The- imusually lova reported tiehicle volumnc of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the 5SFM Traffic Impact Arulvsis Repon, which shows approximately 1054 vehielft per hour in 2016 for NorthboLLM Queen Kaahunianu, Highway at 7 a.m. The dilFt&crce in volurr:e is more than double the maxirnurn IT,%' v.Liaticn generally accepted in day-t"ay measurements and thus urfft iablc: C. The recommendation by 55Fh1 Traf e Irnip.7cE Analymi Report for a rouridabout at. Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualalai Road +;North) is inconsistent with t)c traffic corridor. Intersections drat pass warrants but reviain unsignaliaed present trafftc safety liability concerns Fur the goverrunent-, f The mcornmendation by SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report for roonitoring of the intersection of Queen Knahurranu Highway aM Knakiri I-lighway is inadequ ale, ire, as herL, wi intersectior p:t} s inure �Ilzui one %varraznt underall conditions, si should he pr nnitiv.L-d for study and design 00 siEn l for .rtstallat«n. Ibis circttErtstanre will br crxxterrir�rre�i b�, t!�e proposed praject- 7. In Starr, the DraA Environmental Assessment and S f M Traffic (nipact ,1\nalysis Report drays mt present sufficient, credible facLs and analysis such that the adverse impacts on existing infrAstructize and resulting from incrcmed uZfic cuxi be fully understood and result is appropriate gavemment planning and respunw. I declare under penalty of perjury that die i'oregoiag its true. Dale& Kai lun-Ki +i:A. l- L,%v`al' i, Octobt r 3, 2020. ftnled narne:a Mariarei Donnell in Todd OCT '(, -21) F-J" 17 Nf^ND DELlVERIE0 DECLARATION Cid' 1. MARGARET C.yOhl1`+ ELLAN TODD, declare: 1. I Cirri a residem of Kona Visl&% suhdir+isic►n, County or Hawaii. State of flawai"i. The proposed lam de,.elopment project thM is the subject of the pending Draft Environmental Assemment submitted by Royal Vista Housing Project l'a,: Nlap Key hies. {:3) 7-6-021:016, 7-6- 0 1 -01 !, 7-6-021:018, and 7-6-021:019 North Kc-ru 17istrict. Hawas'i Islmo, Swe ui' l•1 wai `i itll'co, ine pursona1ly as well as affects my interest in real property. 1 teside within appr€ax1ntatcly two blocks of the pmpvsed laid level tttenL Pr€Ject (76-151 Karnehaanalu t.). In such cup:rcitieS, l have firsiband knowledge of the following facts and could And would tc5tify thereto ircalle upon LE) do -w- 2, 1 have renewed the pending DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and attachments. I am pecitically concerned about- the props l's ftlilure to adequately address drainage and sunoffissues including Clic increa-w J laowrrtial for advame +weatherevent.s resulting from cli.rnale change. I nident planning requires that rte%ti dcvelopments are planned tC1 address the potential increme in adverse weather evcros. 3, 7tw :steep Lopography, histrrrical rapid stormwater run-off ,and associated damage present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the Draft Envircnmental Asscssrtrent 4. In sum. Jie Dmft Environmental Assessment dues mr discuss sufficient Facts and analysis such that the necesmary drainage imprc ,crmnts and divers'LGrs can be undersxnod, A proper enviruntnental assoessrnent caanot leave mea big l details w be Laken care of in the future. As I tmderswd it, such circumstances would lead to unla►&rf tl project segnicntdtiort, 1 among other errors. A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting atslhority that r coded infrmLivcuac will comply with govemmertt regulations is insufficient. At a minimum, the Draft Envirujimental Assessrnen( must be revised to show speeifcally what infrastructure imprvvernents are required to tie into the County's drainage system and how tho.9c itnprovef11ettts MU ft=tiot. r deciarc underperWty of penury that [he f6rc!,,,o-Ing- is trait. Dated- Kail�ia-f ina, I lawai'i , Octctber3, 2020. Signature Printed name: It�at mrw Dannellan Todd PA F.� �1!1 5.yy/�/i1 � 6�Lyy1rtrt',,l h�s�1 !, Dr -PT 1��4��h) LIE? 11.�'L �'�l� f,� ill (-,LAR--V1 ON OF 1. MAFOGARET'MDD, ifi wlrare; I am a resi&m of Kona Vistas subdivision, Cokinty ofllaw,ai'i. State of Hawai`i.. The proposed Jud development project that is the suhlcat of the pending Dry Environroenwl. Assessment submitted by loyal Vistas Housing Praject Tax Map Key Nos. (3) 7-6-421:016, 7-6- D21.0O P, 7.6-02 1:01 B. aiW 7-6-021.019 North Kona Dis ict, Hpwai'i Island. State orHowai`i afi'ects me personally as well us affects my interest is rml property_ I reside vw'ithin app Mximately two blocks (76 -15 1 Karncltmnalu St. Kailua bona ) of lite proposed Iand development project. 1n such capacities, I have firsthand ki1rx�, k• ds;e of the following facts and could and would T cst i Cy there tt1 11 called upon to da so. 1 have reviewed the pending DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT and attachments. I arts specillically corcemed ahour inadequate assessment ofarchealujical features, 3, 1 iso not consider drat th,p at` haeolt-ical n-tt, ics OTered in support. of the Drab Environmerud Assessment are adequate. 4. 1 am isuvxv that subi=tial evidence eKiSts that the land cncompa wd by the subieet land parcels iticlt &S features of the Hulualoa Slide, including rock wa11s that arc inadequately described as agricultural walls in tho archaeolagical studies offered in support Of the Draft EnvirorrncntaI Asses=ent. 'The Holualoa Slide is um importam 1-1 awai ian cultural and archaeological fcatwe firorn pre-Wcstem contact times that cam-im be replaced if d=4ged or destroyed, il >. 1 base My, concerns upon iliu e), aluat ua and artalw: i ptrtormed byTorn orn Poh-Au Stone, a copy of which is attached. C. In sum. tate Dmfs EnvirunimEntal Asscssment docs not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the important Hawai`km cultural and archacolugical features can he understood, let alp property preserved. 7. Al a minimum, the Draft Environmeatal Assessment must he revised to address the location, d2in recvvM and. presemmion orthe Holualua. Slide cor rvinenls pffwent on the subject parcels. I declarte uncia penalty of pcejury that the foregoing i; true Daled- Kai]Lta-Korm- Have-ti'i, October 3, 2020 Signalli w�I Pnnlcd name-, rg$ret 1:}� nnell*3n-rodd 01 Stantec September 13, 2021 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tel: (808) 494-2039 Ms. Margaret Donnellan Todd 76-151 Komehamalu Kaulia-Kona, HI 96740 RE: Cornments on the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anficipafed FQNSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawoi'i Island Deni Nis. Donnellan Todd: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 3, 2020; on the draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I arra specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. I am also concerned that the mitigations for Ingress/egress in emergency situations is inadequate. Response 1: As described in Section 3.7.2 of the EA, Kona Three LLC proposes to construct ca new intersection Royal Vistas Roadway at the project's intersection with Queen Ka`ahumanu. This intersection would be built to County and State standards. and dedicated to the County. Additionally, Figure 2 in the EA has been revised to show that access to the project site would be connected to Kekucana'oa Place from Lako Street during Phase II of the project. At project completion, there would be two ways to access the project. This is consistent with access of other communities in Kona. Comment 2: In the Kona Vistas subdivision the proposed project relies on the use of a suo,5T jndord roadway, Kekuanaoa Place, Kekuanciou Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and Is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 3 and Phase 2 bvildouts of the proposed project is Inca:-,c.,q�,ate'ly addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koahui -ionu High oy. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision il'I present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekucancaota Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuancl'oa Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all other Kona Vistas roads, Including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana"oa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of KeWanoa`oo Place to September 13, 2.021 Ms, Margaret Donnellan Todd Page. 2 at 7 Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuona'oo Place during the AM Peak period. and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'ocai Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. GomMent 3: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public foeilifies. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekucana'oa Place. Response 3: Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur .�.t a diffc� rc nt place or time than the proposed project, These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7,1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 card 9, for the AM and PM peals hours, respectively). The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3,7.2 of the EAj. Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims. 'The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way: stormwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11,200.1-13, Hawaii Administrofive Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections eas they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part : Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment 5: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision crising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic.. Delays to these intersections are not exPected to be significant. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a growth rate of M in contrast to the 27 growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impart .Analysis Deport. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non—linear, exponenfial relation.. September 13, 2021 Ms, Margaret Donnellan Todd Page 3 of 7 Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transporfation {HDOT) counts did not show an increase in trcffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lore Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 20720 and 2035 were used tc came up with the 1 growth rate. Although we are not certain haw Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic: engineers used I% from the 2425 LRTP forecast. Comment 7: The TZAR does not recognize multi-generaticr•al housing characteristics common in Hawaii cccording to census data and likely underestirnates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 7 It is hard to predict whether a -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with 'Four cars, or be unoccupiec with no people and no oars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very low standard deviation and on R - squared value very close to 1.074, so statistically this is the nest projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaohumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repo] 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, bath weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 30154 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Norkhbound Queen Koahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maxirrrum 10% variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. Response 8= The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahumanu Highway section between Nani K ailua Read and Hualalcal Road (north), Our traffic count taken in august of 2419 was compared to the 2016 HRCT count and was found to be fairly compcarcible. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kcahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (Northis inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahunnoru Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation, This circumstance will he exacerbated by the proposed project. h F September 13. 2021 Ms, Margaret C)onnellar: Todd Ptge.4of7 Response 9; The Manual an Uniform Traffic Central Devices (MUTCD) states, "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal_" There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and Gathers. The scope covered in this TZAR does not include that analysis, The TIAR does mention where an intersection moy wcr!cnt a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Commenf 10: 1 am specifically concerned about: the proposal's failure to adequately address drainage and runoff Issues including the increased potential for adverse weothe3r events resulting from climate change. Response 10: Section 1.2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the two County -owned parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify that on Tfv K {3) 7-6-21:19, "Infrastructure during Phase II of the Proposed Project includes installation of a culvert system along with utilities and roadway across the ditch to extend Kelcuana'oa Street, which would then be dedicated to the County cis required by Ordinance and called for in the KCDP "Official Transportation Map," For TMK C3j 7-6-21;18, the project includes infrastructure for channelizing a portion of this ditch and includes a road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the KDCP's "Official Transportation Mop." Figure 2 has been revised in the Fincl EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages in the Project Area. Additionally, the text- in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that Kona Three LLC would prepare a Drairage Plan to ensure that developmQnt runcft would be contained onsite. The Droincaae Plan which would be reviewed and approved by Department of Public Works. Comment 11: The steep topography, historical rapid storm water run-off and associated dcrnage reser-t hazards that are not adequately addressed in the DEA. Response 11: Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway is awned and maintained by the State of Hawaii, together with the two culvert systems traversing Queen Ko'ahumanu Highway which transport the floodwaters of Holualoa Ditch ar•d Horseshoe Bend Ditch below Queer) Ka'ahumanu Highwoy. The State has not indicated any problems with being able to maintain the highway or the culverts, and the proposed project would not increase the amount of water in the ditches (per Section 27-20 of the Hawaii County Code)" Additionally, Kana Three LLC is not aware of any damage to adjoining properties, Including Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway, from water flawing from the subject property. h F September 13, 2021 Ms, Margamt C)onnellar: Todd Page 5 of 7 n_mrrrfW 12: The DFA does net discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary draincge improvements and diversions can be understood, A proper environmental assessr-nent cannot leave meaningful details to be taken care of in the future. As I understand it, such circumstonce5 would lead to unlawful project segmentation among other errors. Response 12: See response to comment 10. Also, the Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by DPW. Text has been added in Section 3.3.2 of the Final EA to identify passible options for addressing the issues from ex5ting flooding. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Comment 13: A Mare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastructure will comply with government regulations its insufficient. At o minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must be revised to show specifically what infrastructure improvements are required to tie into the County's draknage system and how those improvements will funct on. Resaoonse 13: The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA, Even though the fined design of the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at a later state, the potential impacts from their construction are onealyzed. Comment 14: 1 am specifically concerned about the inadequate assessment of ca,c:haeologiccal features, and don't consider that the archaeological studies in support of the DEA are adequate. I am aware that substantival evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject porcels includes fe—otures of the Holuaic a Slide, Including rocks wells that are inadequately described as agricultural walls in the archaeological studies offered in support of the DEA.. The Holualoa Slide is an important Howraiian cultural and archaeological feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if darnoged or destroyed. Response 14: As described in Section 3,6 and included in appendix 5 of the FA, two Archaeological Inventory Survey (AISp reports were prepared for the project. As part of the AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evaluated for their significance. The A& were conducted following Hawaii Administrative Pules § 13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sines were considered significant under criterion d because of the information that was learned during the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs ensures that their information is not lost. The documentation done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. Regarding the rock walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 2421 1) documented. This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of a h5lua. Also, the walls were 1.0 meter in height and is similar in constructed to h F September 13, 2021 Ms, Margaret C)onnellan Todd Page 6 of 7 similar historic era rack walls constructed along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of r Land Commission Award (LCAJ #3660. Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the some gulch. It is unlikely that this is a h5lua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a holua in the project site. Comment 15: l base my concerns upon the evaluation performed by Torn PQhaku Stone, a copy of which is attached. The DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological features can be understood let alone properly preserved. The IDEA must be revised to address the location, data recovery and preservation Df the Holualoo Slide components present on the subject parcels. Response 15: In the email provided, there is reference to ''the portion of the holua at the Holuca inn [that] has roc's walls on bath sides" and refers to parallel walls within the proposed development area, possibly Site 31182 Feature 2 and Feature 3 walls which are LCA #3660 boundary wa[is, Primarily,. Mr. Stone's email responses provide accurate information concerning the cultural importance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the neor-coastal region between Kailuca to the north and Keauhou to the south. The remains of many of these complexes were first mapped by Henry Kekahuna. Mr. Stone correctly states the religious and social importance of he`ehdlua and its connection to the sacred and socieapolitical structures along the coast and in the near coastal region. However, the complexes are located more than 1.0 km west of the project area and there are no remains of royal,. sacred car sociopolitical complexes, or a h6lua, within the project area. The existence of a haluo within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Mone. As discussed above. there is no documented oral history, archival documentation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a hblua course existed within the project area. h F September 13, 2021 Ms, Margaret C)onnellar: Todd Page. 7 of 7 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.O_ michele.lefebvre( sl;_antec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawai"i Planning Department Mori, Ashle Fr+om: Yee, Michael Sent: Friday October 02, 2020 1.57 PM To. Mori, Ashley Subject: FW; Comments on Royal 'Vlslas proposed project Attaichments: Royal Vistas corn rnents_i`naJ_pdf Please intake to Jeff. From: Gary East <gwvast:2@grnail.corn> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2020 1.12 PM To° Yee, Michael <Miehael.Ye,-L hawaiicount-V gov> Subject: Fwd: Comments on Royal Vistas proposed pro]ect rrow. Clary LIST - y1i "li�i`r t lviyA proposed prole G. c i f AIQha, wish to submit publir corr7rnents on the RoVal Vistas proposed project that are attatttied as a PDF file to this email. Aloha Gary W East gwe i.� . -ff�r r'Itil.c,rarI 1.16533 Front„ Gary W. East To- Rla rining@ Iiawaiicounty.9t?y twbjert' Corrmentsoo Royal Vistas Housing Project TM Ks: til 7-6-021:016-019 Date. Drlober 2, 20720 Aloha, I am writing to submit public comments on the proposed development ai Une Royal Vistas Housing Project. I am a homeowner in the Poalari Estates subdivision located directly north of the drtticipated project. Ly greatest concern about the development is the lack of highway infrastructure currently in place to stn all of theadditional traffic gererated from 454 housing units It is important to remember that units will contain 1,105 bedrooms when the project E5 Cornplete.4 The dPr11C1 raifirC for the cr • l: + cr, 1:i- r- units will contr;IruLL, to rr7orC than one driver per hduSPhold thus cornpnunding the total r� il�t .. I _ILs for each un -t,. The Queen Ka'ah,jmanu Ffighway, Routel1, that will provide access to tha, l)m)osed develop n7e tit is only a two lane road betweer Henry Streot to the north and the Karrweharnnha III l?.pad to Lhe south. Tr 'if1ic is currently highly corgested In the marnine and a!terrtoon along W, �-r .irt, ,t. -Ach of roadway. Hawaii rounty has planned for rhe reconstructior, inti w.&s nrr,Kof the roadway betwev,1 ih l,ryStreet and Karn III in the furore and I believe this investrili 1 infra.Aru Lure 1`7105t betarnplc:I•,i hi,twe additional housing is Constructed, the f raffic Impact Analysis Repr,rt prepared frac Kona Three LLC by55fM InternatiOnal in r06y 21020 h I, provided ,gin abundance of data to 010del the anticip3ted traffic generated by t -le pt•ooesed RoyO1 Vistas project. However, th+ report is biased by selectlig the date$ for the tramc sLudv of April 30, 2319 a+rd ALJe,(,5t 29, 2019 Vwlien totjriSm for Hawaii island �s at historical luws as shov--ii in figure 1 below Big Is Land Tourism - Ytuiwr ArrivAs by Mh>rii . all. �wrr pis w..t, r� �n roar acv a+vr w hCt��' 'uu+,d�w.h�thrali- t�gde.Cvrnr file$ ima e5 [hart$ 6i -island-uisitc3r-arrivals. n A rnvre realistic assessment would have included the traffic associated with rental vehicles from visitors to this island. Pnaw 1 conMins 172 twD bedraam units and 51 three bedroom units for a katal poi 400 bPdruo�rs. Phase 7 contains 147 two bedroom un 115 and 137 1hree twdrocm oohs For a watal of 705 bedrooms 'total bedrooms, for the project are 1,105. The SSFM document references the number of trips generated frorr The Institute of Trarpspor#aLiu ri Eingineers Trip Generation, 101" Edition (ITE, 2016). The iTE land use category 22C is described as multifamily housing low rise containing ane ar two floorfi and classification 721 is for multifamily housing containing three to teri floors. The proposed development is a combination of two and three story units so neither category completely describes the irCerided project, The data listed Table 9: Estirnated Trips Generatrwd – Pkaye I cri page 19 of the SSFM docun-)ent is very misleading as the equation shown Is for statistical anralvsis of a fitted curve far the ITE data. There is rtta Standard deviation calculated, range of values or confidence* +ntervall rhu indica ted. The calculated trip nurnbp. rs are not based or, any Of the loCal traffic data that is included in the SSFM document_ Also. the AM and PM designations from ITE only o a M4 9.. =6r. «.arra !i•prs +a■+rer'4' ed - P9rau L PM relate to the number of trips between the hours of Lm , Use ir,k(6;I a 4uklrr,n Frlr tai 7-9 ALM and 4-6 Phil, Th I- total number of trips t �� ltzrnl Ln IT,=a.s9-tli:x) CCLZ generated over a 24 hDur period using the ITE data DwrrIuri c _ Unl,s ; r z and for ;�58 units +s estimated to be about 1,7t7U Pixy Irr� 1" I'`` A , rr �� this. is just phase i. For this reason, I believe It Is I° imperative that the existing highway needs to be � 7 ,. T=r-k.1n,r-r—r•#ori ^�rn4'l+ar �.4Wu-n.`Q^.fy upgracledbeforre Lhis project Is develuped. Adding an sdditional 75% more units In phase it will have a large impact on the traffic generated by this project. I also have some concerns about inadequacies and omissions from the draft Environmental Assesswent submitted for the proposed Ftcyal Vistas H4u5ing Project to be developed try Kona Three LLC, The new road that will provide access to the de veloprnent off of � Clueen ICa'ahumanu Highway appears to tw 35 feet wide as shown on the Scale drawing In phase one, the acres; roads tp the burldir gs alid surface parkin G appear tv Le only lg 1vet wide, The drawing indicates about 354 st:rface parking spaces are provided for the 258 units, Is th 5 adcLjuatL for Hawaii Ct}rtniy standards? Is this neighborhood intended to be walkable? I do not see any clear indlcutiun of sidewalks or streetlights. It thk Is the case, i think this is a b'Ig conrerrb especially because the inter}ded 3teupdrxt5 of these uriitrs will certainly con?ain a high percentage of children. How are any residents supposed '.�, .io�ess the parts and swimming parol if [here is no safe way to ;het to thein? The park area for phase I looks to or r have at most 15 parking spaces which appears to be in,actcclulate, The access roadways for phase two also appear restricted to a single lane Is feet wide. I-Icwr+ could two vehicles safely pass each rather it they were traveling in the opposite direction? Again, I see no clear indication of sidewalks and streetlights for these units Vehicle parking in phase two appears to be uanderserved. Is everyone living in these units expected to parts inside of their garase? Marey occupants of these t6vo and three bedroom units wilk have additional vehicles and where are they expected to park them? I have no way to judge the design of for rainwater mitigation except to say that the square footage of the upper purtion is then carnpressed to what appears to be a relatively small 40 foot wide culvert. stow deep is this structure required to be s7 that it can contain the runoff from the upper purtion7 Trees will this be ferced, or access restricted from tt'e occupants of this development? Aloha Gary East TMe estimate was obtamed using a spreadsheet from the Norida D"rtment of Tra°isporta=,on with data frarn the W" Ecrion 11-E Trip Generation Report rrms:ffw+w.'.fdot Ryvll?lartninEJU jUin$(,0LX Vrt�go jj5r*,1 Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec Consutfing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tek {$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Gary East 'iia email: gweasf2 q:gmail.com RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSi for Royal Vistas Rousing Project, North Kano District, Hawaii Island Dear Mr. East: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 2. 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment {ISI=Aj for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment l: My greatest concern about the development is the lack of highway Infrastructure currently in place to accommodate all of the additional traffic generated from 450 housing units. It is important to remember that the 450 housing units will contain 1,105 bedrooms when the project is complete. The demographic for the occupants of these units will contribute to more than one driver per household thus compounding the total number of vehicles for each unit. Response 1: The Institute of Transportctien Engineers (ITE), Trip Generafan Handbook referenced in the Traffic impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 in fhe EA) used for the traffic analysis uses housing units, and it does not assume vie person per unit. This is toker) from the ITE trip gen handbook regarding land _Ise 220: 2.72 residents etre assumed for each unit. There is no trip generation for number of bedrooms. It is difficult to analyze and make projections based on number of bedrooms, or haw many people we expect in beciraams. The ITE trip generation for land use 220 collected data on low-rise multi -family housing, and based on that data, the traffic model came up with a best fitted curve. which discussed below, has a very low standard deviation, and a very high R squared value, which indicated that the data collected is not .scattered. The TIAR assumes o land use that is typical. and with the best possible data, captures the number of project generated trips. Comment 2: The {ween Ko'chumanu Highway, Route 11. that will provide access to the proposed development is only a two-lane road between Henry Street to the north and the Kamehameho III Read to the south. Traffic is currently highly congested irl the morning and afternoon along this entire stretch of roadway. Hawaii county has planned for the reconstruction and widening) of the roadway between Henry Street and Kam III in the future and I believe this investment in infrastructure must be completed before additional housing is constructed. September 13, 2021 Mr. Ccffy East Page. 2 of 4 Response 2. The State's plans to widen Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway from Henry Street to Komehomeho I'll Road as a result of existing levels of traffic congestion have keen contemplated for more than ten years. This improvement is listed in the 2035 long range transportation plan for the Big Island. However, the project's analysis was conducted with the 2 -lane highway and leveis-of-service at the signalized intersections were acceptable. Comment 3. The TIAR provided an abundance of data to model the anticipated traffic generated by the proposed project. However, the report is biosed by selecting the dates for the traffic study of April 30, 2019 and August 29, 2019 when tourism for Hawaii Island is at historical laws. A more realistic assessment would have included the traffic associated with rental vehicles from visitors to this island. Response 3: Based can the numbers for the 2018-2019 monthly tourism numbers, August 2019 had the 4th highest visitor total and April 2019 had the 10th highest visitor total. This is consistent with the information you provided. For all islands, the pattern is similar with high visitor volurne in June through August, December, and March which corresponds to summer brew, winter break, and spring break. These are when school is not in session, so visitor traffic is high as people travel more. When school is out, typically the overall traffic volume during the AM and FM peak hour is lower. Generally, traffic counts are taken during "worst case" scenarios, which care historically on Tuesday through Thursday during school days. This is information we know, and we purposely target school days as when we take our traffic counts. While tourism numbers may be low, the intensity of the peak during the AM and PM school day peaks are generally more intense than the AM and PM peak during non -school days. Here is the HQQT station on Queen Kcohurnonu Highway in 2016. It shows that the monthly weekday overage is fiery close to the yearly weekday average. The standard that traffic engineers use is the school day peak; therefore, the counts taken in April and august are defendable. Comment 4: The TZAR references the number of trips generated from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 10th Edition (ITE, 2016). The ITE land use category 220 is described as multifamily housing low rise containing one or two floors and classification 221 is for multifamily housing containing three to ten floors.. The proposed development is a combination of two and three story units so neither category completely desc lbes the intended project, Response 4. The project proposes mostly 1- to 3 -story buildings. The traffic engineer reviewed low-rise and rr7id-rise multi -family housing options. Mid -rise, Land use 221, would actually provide lower numbers than Low -Rise. Therefore, the trip generation utilized in the traffic analysis is more conservative. The project's density does not correspond with high-rise multi -family housing, Lana Use 222. Therefore, the trip generation used in the analysis is appropriate. Comment S. The data listed Table 9: Estimated Trips Generated - Phase I on page 19 of the SSFM doct+ment 15 very misleading os the equation shown is for stofistical analysis of Q)� September 13, 2021 Mr. Cary East Page. 3 of 4 a fitted curve for the ITE data. There is no Standard Deviation calculated, range of values or confidence interval rhea indicated. The calculated trip numbers are not based on any of the local traffic data that is included in the SSFM document. Response 5: The fitted curve is available when there are "enough" data points to determine a best fitted curve. If there are not enough data points, the ITE trap generation will have only an overoge rate, but the best fitted curve is generally ea more accurate projection based on actual data points collected. The standard deviation was not provided in the TIAR. As shown in the figure below shovers the standard deviation of 0.12, which indicates that the fitted curve will generate outputs really close to t'• -e overall mean. The R squared value is 0.90, which also indicated that the regression prediction is very close to the collected data. Therefore, the best i--t;r1 cove is the correct curve to use when available, and the traffic enginrr, :::e +.tiaenr in the number selected. Comment 6: Also, the }1^Ji cr—), -, PM designations from ITE only relate to the number of trios between the hours of 7-9 AM and 4-6 P, The total number of 'trips generated over a 24 hour period using the ITE data for 258 units is estimated to be about 1,7002 and this is just phase I. For this reason, I believe it is imperative that the existing highway needs to be upgraded before this project is developed. Adding an additional 75% more units in phase II will have o large impact an the traffic generated by this project. Response 6: While it is accurate that the 24-hour traffic is higher than the ANI and PM peak hour traffic generated by the project, the AM and PM peak hours are when traffic is at its worse. The TIAR looks to provide mitigation during the worst traffic periosts. The overall traffic can Queen Kaahumanu Highway is much lower during the non -peak hours. Figure 4 In the TIAR shows the 4• -hour volume on Queen Koahumcanu Highway between Mani Kailua Drive and Hualalai Read. This chart shows the AM and PM peak periods, with lower midday volumes, and much lower volumes before the AM peak and rafter the PM peak. Comment 7: T�-ie new road that will provide access to the development ruff of a (ween Ka'ahurnanu Highway appears to be 36 feet wide as shown an the scale drawing. In phase one, the access reads to the buildings and surface parking appear to be only 18 feet wide. The drawing indicates about 354 surface parking spaces are provided for the 258 units. Is this adequate for HQwaii County standards? Is this neighborhood intended to be w❑IkablO I do not see any clear indicat-lon of sidewalks or streetlights. Vehicle parking in phase two appears to be underserved. Is everyone living in these units expected to park inside of their garcge� Response 7: As designated can Figure 3 of the EA, the layouf and dumber at e:uildirgs and parking spaces are conceptual. Phe final number of parking spaces will determined upon final identification of unit mix (I.e., number of 2- bedroorn and 3 -bedroom units), and will have the number of parking spaces as required by Hawaii County Code and zoning ordinance based on the numbers of each unit type. Regarding sidewalks, the text in Section 1.2 of the EA has been revised to clarify that the rood segments that would be built to dedicoble Q)� September 13, 2021 Mr. Ccffy Fust Page. 4 of 4 standards would include sidewalks and curved gutters. Regarding walkabiliiy, the text in Section 1.2 of the EA has been remised to clarity that private drive oys in the development would be paved and provide safe access to residents (including streetlights), and that walk paths within the development would be identified upon uncal design. Comment 8: 1 have no way to judge the design of for rainwater mitigation except to sty that the square footage of the upper portion is then compressed to what appears to be o relatively small 40 foot wide culvert. How deep is this structure required to be so that it can contain the runoff from the upper portion? And will this be fenced, or access restricted from the occupants of this development? Response 8; As discussed in the EA, the project would not contribute or exccerbafe the flooding issues from the project. To prevent these issues (described in Section 3.3.2), the project would prepare a Drainage Plan in accordance with Chapter 27 of the Hawali County Cade which would be reviewed and approved by DPW. As required by Chapter 27, runoff from the project site would not be directed toward adjacent properties f -)rtl- rrivate and County -owned) and the develap"nt would not alter the dre; i -; fje pattern above or below the development. This plan would be submitter: .is part of the grading pian submittal prior to project construction. The text in Section 3.3.2 of the EA has been revised to clarify what is required as part of Chapter 27 of the Hawaii County Code for developments regarding containment of runoff. To ensure public safety, any structures constructed to manage runoff Cis identified in the Drainage Plan would be compliant with. County requirements, with public access restricted. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at �808i 494-2039 or by email, Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. ,Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. rr)lchele.lefel�vre;iistcntea.ccrr. cc. Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC lvtaFja Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley Frorn: Candace Hallett. <t,alletltj r r?tail.c m> Sera: Saw-rday, Octobe, 03. 2C20 11:33 AN1 TW,; Planning Internel Mail Subject,. Royal Vistas He u5 ifig Project EAcamrnef►ts Attachments; Royal Vistas Declarafinrt -Traffic Candy.pdt Please find attachedaffidavit va hefinifof Candi'lGe ! t[alley. resiling ai �6-154 Komcharlalu St., Lot4-263' 'rhaj* voii For vouT considuat ran. CSndI iw:c Hal,LT. 1.16519 I)] -( I_Al�..L ION OF CAN11AC I. J 1 1A 1 I I'.I,I 1, , a %D C+. i Hr1LLIFT l I - devliiri'. I am o rw sidziu ol-176 136 lti.i►iiiehamulu St Komi l'ici34 si_ilidivis,'Wiil. Coujic� dxt Ila\i"i L'i. 5tatc of I Iaw'cu--i. Ifiktirriposed 1wid < o vJ;rpi cr,,t rR'1:Ct 'J::it ib the subject of the pemlim,. I iral I i -m irdpiirtsd:ni 1, A�ssnn!_ s-uhntitted by Irc>apiilr stm,, 1-hPusing Project Tm N{an key Nos - 7 - o os-7-o t )l -0116:ill 7. 1-6.021.01 R. and ?-6-921:019 North Kow District. I Iirr4ai'i lslii»{l, titaw ttif l 1au-ai i � I1l�ct� and �+:rs�wL>I.tll� as �1 r11 Iii .itto�Is nie interest in rc.iI I}rril74`rr[ I rti,illc wiihiii _501 fc't'l I dlistr13td.'rI Llf the prOPOSt:J 161-11d Lldy\elrI�Lrteni prrij('ct Iii ;Lich d:upsi+:itieki. I lja,\e tir tlt trtd knt)ti� lLLd,�e cIt'r.hc foIIowirig t'tiet, aikJ ccPtiId ajid L\ciiiIld w5lit�' th`re[u O' C.111e(t L1114lri t0 1141 !iO. I Kiwe re%iowedl ifiv pend mi I]Ii,AF J 1;NVIR(-)N.%'1FN. T.%L ASS1_SSi4tLN I i>nchidinir the lraVic Impact AiliLI'4mk IZUV%Lirt 171,' ';SFV1 I:ite:rrlalir 1133 d.ateJ JulV 21120 gild iiltii hccl as Appendix 2 to ilio IyliAF I 1-;P+1VlR()NMF,\ I Al.. SY—.SS-MEET. I wu ;}�tilicallw concerned andnut adNerse traf i.c imaewtw hoih wilhin jod %Nitl-wui the Kona Visms sulx1i%,I-i4 n that are i of ttill� oraecuratcly addre! uscd iit fit Y�[:M Trafli* 1iT-tNw Anal,sis Rt purl. I mimic anti th". *,,N1 N1 I raftic impact Arid ysis PVp,art, urti X1:.;4_ Ns,:l in dic body of the DRAp I EI*eVITZONM[ ' TAL. at p1p. 4-56, 67 and . I. —1w pimentiat liter Ltd %% reaitterils A' Roy i1 Vk'L- ti lrx use Sunet Ave ajid Leiliani til. a.,, a cut-tbnough to i ckuarw'OH PlaX pc)ses a real chrLal ic- the resirlrrtts ol' f4ana Vistas Street; %%Lthlu Kona Visuzi 1:1101 Meaair tO handle high vo[umes ofirattic. In atidilion, um resiclml rcgulArly %valk along our ru ds, 1,d'Ak Lh it du��s and children ride their bikes all clri o_.tr streeIs since we do noL havetiIdek +.:'I., - I In4'reasgNl l+'i•I1W ;i' Ir''.ail_ ,lut; it, thc in11LL\ L1ILLttsidec-t- Ill I�l?l':ll 1�(i#ti k7ii[1 L)nl% Il'[1i,+: aih.L'rlt Offt,I r'. r Ile t':il,l.'f w I .t'I.. VI:iUb i.l 4,I I% Art' 1.111 �`iwzsC-t. In the l' CInEl. Ilijta;; Sull,liw-isil_ln. tflc' pn§p,w cid pn ject relje,, on the Lze tlI'd ttklst�ta�d r Ct73{��w{��, Kektwel11L1'ua MCC. KekL91TWOLI Pldcq� is 1 zry wtu p, has 111TwiLul Sipllt di,taiict.':, rale t1a %:YU6 ale CUr-'es and is mimvx,�IEh cwct sI11ewv i]kw. ThL impact t.lt' i11L'rcaw d traffic AP.Sing in'un Ph-L{w l �111d Nhamv ? buiI liw, o tllc RL)val Vistas I {nllwoww " 11r1)Iw<o i5 inadl glklaTCly addre.sced in the ISSFN1 TrFiCCI Impact:ltrllysis Report. which taAl U%es iTwtitC id on i11wp�uAsawl lig [ ucen KmlwLwwl anu I lighwuw, l ttflt partic:Ltlarly cl,ncerned that adding numerous %Chic lQ trip, III and fto wl a -mrpaiuw sabJivision w[l] present (1.11-1P1,07 N Emil ooii egtion to ru.,,i 4:Ms aaloll� KckLJ 11M'tfa Place. l Ci jisod r that the Planning MparLwrll.`n, Shk)Llld requiru the Lapplictini w adds- ,'s t1wcn .'Sr11tLCYl a. 4• The I)RAI"1 1""Al RONMI"N'l AI. A'00I'S S IrN I"rt:gLit n:, cw•'.ilaLat1071 Of. Unto wg oilrlm. a hteJ".wsealPwtkffw ]rt1JUM'f,x, .w'llCh !1+' tWf,)ufJlr0J7 rharogn% rrr'vjJ ecfx nn pjrhFrc jerc•Wfhi . Chayawr 11-20U.1-1 +. 1[awraii Fldrrlinlrtrat:Nk: I.[iks lr[stc-ad vi-igairel) midrtsssing Ihcsc iissucst 11E��+�re4r. Tii, DRAFT I NVI1WN.%11,N IAL A'S` i N 1 wiWpk i[wm. 1:l,rirtjtlT1�� tlt:Il NO1 'ILk �'r,e° °•t'k+lrl{1;1r� el'k tfi are a\llected si leo Till: wtC%CIO MIC It tt[)L1JCl littl)1 cv%tin}a inlrahuluuture. pruvi& i[,l i it IuluAI[g. mid is not k:\p:: ;W .l k? tQ.sult ill subs tidal dill atldsto Cokwl1 war%Icer'." It is;;eriou,omi57ion for dw IW.AI 11�NV1R1 )NM 1:NTr'ti. A' : F-N'-�MFINT LO tail Lu .wac tai tl-it plkt+rjuial advevic iMPOCU, 01 die Ilsr Of suhstandard ckisiing intiastructLlrc. I1ki: Itia:kIldM'wM V] iL:e- Thv l KA] 1 FNVJk()NM1,\ I'M ;;dN�:rse [r3flic i111�;iv< t,lYl4 ill the �t+l IcXL « w lIct11cr I li: prsI k,0 woliIiI flrive �I srrhsla wicd aill-rrse +< *cj ?m p1th f. health I IV .�l�plic.�r1t elaitnti. "I hC I'rr )O-S'cl PrcJOUT WOUld not aft�ct public hc�altla in iuly %UIV_ !.A0rM"1c1r,cr ukcxlld ht apprcapriate IN- diSlX)S0l raf in drawage ,Iruclllres i r~€i#fo im at, have b I1 taken into in pro iect. �I.S�`�P�" I mphasis adder- This bald conclusion dere, mot �iddress potential adverse imp�iCLS os required by Chaptcr Ilawaii Adminlsmitivo Rules, 6. the I'IarnII1119 1)CE%tFtriICE rI wlr(jItId IloLaret:s:pi the 1)ltiAIs 'l I'.`* V I R I k''%NII-NTA L rA' SSFSS'4 EN I's reIiuii4v ,,ru IIIL: SSI -\.,I I m1"11c ImpacI Ana3lysiw Repor1, %N I d c I I hvr th% 1011vi�vI ng & 16cncies: ;,a. ldilurc I jddrms ak1vcr.L trAw, impa (�t: Nti -thin tete Kona Vistas wN ivisriorr wi.%irrg from Iliv hritlLier b. l`ht: SSI -M I'rat 1 r I mjxw t ft_u i} i kcprrt www ;a LurtiwI[I rare o f I in c011tr4m grcrwiki roic mpit j yed tr) the -2019 Witehcr I.n41neeri% Ir;t11"w Iin1xict Aiiah5ia Report. Tt'ui tiro L evrigvwvn is Wry sensitive IQ gfo;,\1113 [utt• ill a ricrri-l[ncar. expc►ner)riatl Nblian: t . 1 kte SSIA1 f r+A lir: Impact .algal,sis I cpori do,2 noc mco.Twe multi-gcncratiL)nal 11 housing vharavwristics common In I I:ivatii rac.420rdigg (0 CeJb ry data and likely undereslirn;ltcs droll. vAicic tri ps e en-ilyrttabi tv huildc) »t ;A' Ilc propu cd pr11.1tct: I]. The S-SF1%I k r.illic Impact ARep"rt employs up. unrl.su.ally lnvv vehielc Volume tat S-5-3) vehiJes IbrNorthhatrnd Owen Kaahuinantr higltwa y kin the ele ted dares of April 30. 21119, a "eckcla+ and Aq.t A 4. 2019. a Saturday, t:cmmpart%i with rhe NIS W[]cher l n,-incuring 1'raflic lmprtei Airmlgsi2� lk"oi- . which rL.port4'ci 1057 %chicles titr.!rmiary 14 arrsd 15. ,SII I (}. hratli v6e,, t d,l I he untt_sualI io%o m!porrod rL•hIde VOIt RIC Of 853 is :.LI'-o;it c As- tik7tn 1:,gurc 4 oI' ilie SSl-%-1 Frn11ic frnpUCt - aalysis Rel -Km. wIiiL:h ,,hows nppro-%jtmlc1;, tC50 vthiciew per hour in 21110 for Nor(hhs7und Queen Kri11'iUjaj,,u I figf m ay al 7 a.rn. The Jil'krcricc in voltvtic is wort} than double the maXirrturn IOP -O' var4Lthin genoraik acceplcd In umLyLjrcniciius aTid dhcs mireLihie. The ri�cLttrtntcrt#kifiwr h% S.SFNI Tratric ItnPao Anah sis, Report I'va rauadlaht)ur w Queen Kn---iittut>xYtrit I 0111 I [IM1411r0 140.1.f t4i,rt1f1 is jIlConji's il. w1h tllc IrLttlic vurridor. In[ermectietn:4Tlmt pals IatLl rmimn LinsigrinlUed r1'e5Cnt tra it NLli;Lv li,4bilAN, �.oj- e.ms kir the >•~ovc mei r. !'. Th -v r,,:4;ommcndaiion by SSFNl frail ic: Irtipact 12gx ri lire mutdLorim,, of tfk inter-wellom L,i Llc',:tl KUL1iYuiniinu l lighw.iy anal Kuakini Highwa.sr i,4 imid"juatc. 1r4'lyc` % a licre:. U11 IttIcr. ctioll p.r ties !More t.hwi mu i4ttrl=L under al l coriditiirris, it should hr priorinvcd ISFr h1L16J%' JrsLl cIc'+FL.rY cli ti nnl tr�r iJ} tullsltl4kil, I f114 �irllll"]t5C4i114'C 14111 ltd �'.YFjt�,�' i lCtl I1ti t�1C 17te1�14Yy�(I rlrilt�`L`I In siin1. the ,Draft I:nrrt,`«ltttirjtt:tl Auvvsgjv;:, t unci 4SF?4 Tra llic lmpa.ct r1rt.Lks, Riq-mire dock wt pre:seni at1l7:Icjt tI1.4 rckl;iblc lactg -Imd Limlvsis Such that IN.adv rse inlrXIct& 011 4xi liirg ir3fi*awtnYcl_irc and teSIL1111)_ trjtltc can he lAilly unds:rsiLw i;,irrd rvsull its approprialcgover , ,,i I,l I Liudarc urulcr pendiv G i r., C' :Yt 1}it.` tiorcgaiing is true. Daied' Kailua-ko,i:i_ J Irtti4 i'i. r }. ,a I_r " )Z4 4ina[�u: "r wed rkirme 4 Septerr'rber 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsulFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek t$QSI 494.2039 Ms. Candace Hallett Via ernail, he IIettcj 6 cir-)&.c:om RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Graft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Dear Ms. Hallett: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 3. 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA) for the proposed project. Blease find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I arra specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fuIly or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. gornment 2; The potential for new residents of Royal Vistas to use Sunset Ave and Leilani St. as a cut -through to Kekoona'oa Place poses a reap threat for the residents of Kona Vistas, Streets within Icon❑ Vistas were not meant to handle high volurnes of troffc. In addRion, our residents regularly walk along our roads, walls their docs anal children ride their bikes all on our streets since we do not have sidewalks. The increased volume of traffic Niue to the influx of residents in Royal Vistos can only have adverse effects for the residents of Kona Vistas and those living on Sunset. Response 2: While it is possible that alter Kekuana`oa Place is connected in Phase II of the project, some residents could travel into the project site from the south by turning onto Sunset Avenue, thea north on Leilani Street (or Puolani Street), then east on Lake, and then west on Kekuana`oa Place, this would represent the majority of traffic or where backups could occur. This is why the traffic study focused on impacts at the intersections identified in Section 3.7.2 and in Appendix 2 of the EA. Comment 3. In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place, Kekuanaoa Place is very steep. has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase l and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in fht TIAR, which focuses instead on irnpocis along Queen Koahumanu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips September 13, 2021 Ms. Candace Hailed Page 2 of 4 to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 3: Kekuana`aa Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all other Kona Vistas roads, including paved swales ❑s sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact an Kekuana'oa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuano'oo Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is cornpleted, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on K8kunna'oo P: ace during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak ,seriod. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuaria`vo Plod; every 4 i-inutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Comment 4- This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts. such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse iirnpoats of Increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure. like Kekuana'oa Place. Response 4; Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that wauld caacur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for an island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potenh al traffic impacts to Kekuana'oa Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phose ll outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and P peak hours, respectivelyj. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts {Section 3.7.2 of the EAS. Comment 5, The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The applicant claims, "The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way, storrneater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic 'impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules, Resg2nse S. The fes, describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health... The summary statement quoted is included In Part 5, Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment G: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA"s reliance on the TIAR, which faN to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 6; Intersectian within the Kone Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local September 13, 2021 Ms. Candace HaHetl Page 3 of 4 residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 7: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR, Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponenfial relation. Response 7: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show can increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lang mange Tronsportation Plan forecast projections for 20201 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used 1% from the 2025 LRTP forecast. Comment 8. The TIAR does not recogni-ze multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 8_ It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will hove 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, cr be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus, The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise carid mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily horsing was tiled since it provided a higher volume output, This lana use has a very low standard deviation and an R- squcared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the bast projection used by the traffic engineer. omment 9: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kracahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repoi 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low repcded vehicle voluma of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Koahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10% variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. R_esrsorlrse 9: The most recent Historic HDOT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahurnanu Highway section between Nam Kcailua Road and Hualcalai Road (north). Cour traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HOOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 1Q: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalal Road (North} is Inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. September 13, 2021 Ms, Candace Haled Par ue 4 of 4 The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Quem Kaahurnonu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response I - The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states. "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warroO5 shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are Cather considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increose in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geornet6c feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may, be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. miche le.lefebvreCq"steantec.com cc; Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley Nom: +-A i i:iaeLi� Hallett ehaIlettcjOff gmail.camy Sent: Saturday, Oct�#aer 03. 20201129 AM 7o: Planning Internet Mail Sub*t: liayal Vistas Hcusing Project. EA comments Attachments: Royal Vistas Declaration - Traffic - RorLpdf Please find attached an affidavit on hail f of R0.:mId R 1-1 al Iott re,, flint/ at iii- 136 ),:arnchaenrrlri Vit_, Lit 1;2632 Thaac yuu I'M -your consideral iLI11. Ronald Hallett DFIXT,NI, A I ION OV RONALD R I Irl LLF': I_I I, RONALD It IIIAL.,I-T1 . declare: 1. I nm a. res Tder I4of [76-156 Kamehanualu St ' Kona VIstas fiubcfi isi,leif, ['olid , of lea •ai"i, Stase nfllav4ai'i. '1'l2 pro)sed land dCvC1Oprr nl pr+Dj ct that is the subject ofthe ponding 1Xali i-',mvirkinmcntal Asap rnCnl sutmoilwJ bo Rova.l Vistas Emising Prcajecl %'ax Map KeN Nus, l'? } 7 -6 -0211 -.OW 7-6-1.121 1 017. 7-0-(}2 ]:(')18, artist 7-0-021.11 19 North Kond 17ititriel. 11-mvai,I Island. Stale of I l a"u]'I nffe is me pem—onnII%I as MCI I as at'iects env iMetes( bi wul propvriv. 1 reside within _500 acct [distance] of the pr�pisvd laid developnlcrll proic:t. In suclr Capacities, I have firsthand knk-► ledge of Oe li]llciwing facets and could and would ttsrify tht.°cvtu il'ealhNj L11)vIs talo'41 I have reviewed tile pendirg DRAFT l''NVl.kfi. \A1FN1"AL ASSESSMENT [nclCld-Mg theTraffic Imptawt Analysis Report by 5SFIV Int'6mimioral, d4 wd July 42020 sand sttachcd as Appendix ? to the WAFT ENVIRONTMI:NTAL ASSESSINI[ NTT. 1 aur speci.lieally concerned Axrtp aclvase tragic iml%)cts broth v-ithin and withowL the Kona Vislas subdivision List arc` -ioi full} c7 au4yvratel- addressed in the lmpnct Aivalysis Reporr. Traffic anti tho ;4SOY1 ''rabic Impact Analysis Report. are discusied in tht! body, coat WATT 1_'..NVLIt[lNME TAI, ASSI`)9! -1I•NT, at pp, 48-56, 67 and 71. 2.a The potemial for new roidents of Roval Vist„.s, to use Su sct Avc and Laeilani St. as a cukhrcmugli to I AUM'QU plate p;rsc:k a real Lhrc-,riw flit: resit umb. of Kcrmt Vistas. Suets within Kona Vistas were vot meant tv Dandle higb t o[uines of traffic. rn Wiliam our restdems. regularly walk aiong our- roads_ walk Ther dugs diad children ride their hikes all on our streets shice we do not have sidewalks. The mtrt�ac�eet volut re Oftrzatllic duQ Lu 1110 intlLi.�c of residenti in RuvalVisl&s em only have idver etfiects for t1v residents ni'k.una VisUu and those living on Stint. .b- I am asenior u'itli bealtlt issues cizd lirnitecl mobility so the inc.eut:i tr,.jtjir, ttttiitcly posts a SCHOU threat to nie personally. I . hx t1w Kona Vistas sula'di} i:+km. the propQsW prujec:t Nhes urt Lhc use of a sAstandar r4.► w l w , , K,.:Lu:La1woa Pluu. Kokuanrs`oa Place is vcr%' s1ccp. has Iimn tcd sig -1v dimmve-s dve to exiiciix cuj, c, dtld i� flaITOw W]III [7LI The impaer gat incre.,i.Ae ] traffic arising from Phase 14L11d P .bC 2'Duildouts vf'thc Royal Vistas l loosing Project i inade.-. i 4r.. 1% addru cd in the SSYM Traffic I'rrapact ArmIysis I v pr,rt, which (ac mse, iwuv.i,I f 11 i,7, � Oucen Kaahum:inii I lighw;q. I ant 1%k i:..ulV cimccrn,.�l thm adding nu-mor,,� , :. . ti•, �.:, and 1 r-ia P1a ii ;.�: paratc subdivi:c on twi l l present dan gers ai , i I, 's I i, C1, I , kl r K&uwaa'ou Place. 9 uonsidee that the Planning DquI -tn-ient should fL�q riJre t1w Address these ct.nccrns. 4. -I'lle IAAYT I,,NVIRO N-MENTA1. ASSES! MFN-1 req uiies e v a] u a rimn of, arn Ong uUiens, adverse Tecrandar.v frrtpac?.s. _viec•h as popi alion ciutnges or afirds orr P!ablit: facWdes See Chapter 11-200.1 -11, Hawa.ii Adnta.n sUativu Rule. instead of squarely addiressing these iSO, Uos. however, the DRAFT i; NVIRONMENTAL ASSFSS%4FIN] sitnlply is pores th o rn. claiming that. "No advczsc stco dart. etfec.Ls are t,.,,peuled since the development woLrld uziIiZe existing inrra.5trtac1UX . Erre` kk infill housing.. and is not expected to restdi in subsianiial demand; to County s�errices-" It is a serious owission I -or tht. DR_AFI ENVlR[lltiEMl;NNAL. SS'I'4tiMEN I tin fail to address the putential a i�rwc iwpLi-is €=1 incrcasing the us(! of SUhStanddrd c�€i, hrig infmstructun, like Kekuatta`cia PILic , S. T t�1�Al=lE�,'��'lR�!:ii:'�T„�tl i1�Sl:�ti�3L�f 41�:llcsscs a;irersc tra€`�r: impacis Only in the no"Itext of whcthc�r the project would J/I)L', JLjj' F.Ve of mi on Imblir healrb, The Applicant clairn, "Thc Proposed Projtu VV(110 FIN :11'jvCt fatrhlic hegth -m an), way, swrinwater %vkmld ler; a mpriately disposed of in drainage sirtictures. TmIlie ira,74 is have lecen t' tIILnttee, r� r u1 cord aeration i .4zr-OjzqAjc�” Emphasis added. This bald r:cTnuhisiun does not address porenti4i udverm.- Jimpa is as rec.1iiired by (-hapicr 11-200.1-13. tiawaii Admimbarative Malt•,. ti. Vic Planniq De—ii imow zboijld not .iccept the DRAFT F` VrRON.I0E-,'N'F 1. i\SSENNN H.1'wIT's rolli4nc,� ,sn the "kSJl N11 I`rafflc IMPUt :LilWSis Repc)rt, «ltich hws the following; defic.ienclos: J . iMure w addrti ,, adverse traffiiC: impnos within the Kona Vjr tns subdivision arising From the prgjer,~al; h. 111--' SSI NI Traffic Impact Ana. yiis Report uses a `roe -.t% rate of l`4, m conLimi tt, the "Vo gruwtli rate employed by the '018 Witcher Engrincerin ] rat"hc Irnr i Analysis Report. TruITIu Lcns esticn is very Sensitive to grsa,%Nth rate in a ROTO -linea-- e' lPonential reintion: C. The Sti1-M `I'raft"ac lmpact Analysis Report does nrat racc� rias -W ai�a.lti--gcna.:raiIorat housingcharacwt-islies mixt non in IIswaiT acw7ding to cew;n,r dam anct likele u�Aeresiimates daily vehicle trips aurihuta.hk to buildout of the pmpawd project; I d. I are SS17M Tra! i1L` hTir et Aruxlysis Report cmiplcvs aa unusually' low tvhi":ie V01Ume Of 853 VL:h.icicti IiTt NL]rtliho =d Quecir Kaahum.mu Ilighl4M On the snlOded dates nr April 30. 2019. a,.vc6:k.iav and August 24, 2019, a Sattizday. L Lmipared Nkith the 21918 Witt~kr I ngineeriaug Traffic hnpact Analysis Report, which IJ 101- Jz IL&El 14 and 15. 21016. hath iveekdays. 'rhe unwqually lo,,v rc-poncd v -A. cl, I . d a S53 is also at cxih; rxish Figkitt 4 O Lhe 44FM '1'railic ImPaet AnzJvAs Repmt. which i I-lrrnximLite ly 105-0 vchiele.s per hi -,w in 016 far Northbound Qu%xn Kaahunranu I highway at 7 a.m. 'floe �lil1� res<<�: in tifolunic is snore. than double. the txla_ximLull I0 ,'a variation goncratly accepted itv daN +z ,lay measurements and thus tinreliablv. U. 'I'lie recnmn-wndation by SS FM Traffic Impact Analysis Repan Iar a roundabout at QucE:n Kaahiirnanu I [ighwtiv and f lualalai Road (Norih) i.t iwonsistent with the traffic c.c•►nidor- Tu terse e tions that pass wvarrmus bW IL:111UirT un-;ignaltzed preseni traffic &alety" Iiabili#v° CoTI xrni l 7r the _gUvvmrnent. f. Thi; rccc'rtrn%.nticttivn by SSFM'Iratlic Iti111 :t r``4ilativ°; [s Rcpwl for monitoring of the incersec Lion ofQuwn KHahumanu l li htivav and Kuakitli liighway is inadqnate. Where, 4% here_ an itntersrctien I)U.Ntii� more than one vvarsaiTt u.J r all contlitiM1,L�, it slpckulcl hUpriaritr d fOr 111ri'.V artid 41csit n O1' LL si gi I u: !'ur ir_4tallatii1r. I J71S Circumstance %kill be exacerbated her the proposed project. 7. In wnL the L mfi Fnvironmcrttal .Asccs3ment aixd SSFM Tra1TiL: Impact ,An'llys-IS Rcp{.M docs rtof present suffin.iem. creel-Nes Cuts and analysis such that the adverse-nipacb; ort C5tia- infra tmuuIureand wsuItIng, t'rcrn ijetease J iraMe can be fuIIV ttnd4rstood and result in appropriate govemmeni planning, and re:spoiasc, I deciare wider pena.Ity of pct Lay that the I`orcgoing is true. 4 I K ;I I I i f:i-Kona- I iuk a I "L Ocfi6cr 3, 7020- S-ItIn-laitite: ?riiltr,,J nanw; Septerr'rber 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsulFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek t$QSI 494.2039 Ms. Candace Hallett Via ernail, he IIettcj 6 cir-)&.c:om RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Graft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Dear Ms. Hallett: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 3. 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA) for the proposed project. Blease find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I arra specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fuIly or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. gornment 2; The potential for new residents of Royal Vistas to use Sunset Ave and Leilani St. as a cut -through to Kekoona'oa Place poses a reap threat for the residents of Kona Vistas, Streets within Icon❑ Vistas were not meant to handle high volurnes of troffc. In addRion, our residents regularly walk along our roads, walls their docs anal children ride their bikes all on our streets since we do not have sidewalks. The increased volume of traffic Niue to the influx of residents in Royal Vistos can only have adverse effects for the residents of Kona Vistas and those living on Sunset. Response 2: While it is possible that alter Kekuana`oa Place is connected in Phase II of the project, some residents could travel into the project site from the south by turning onto Sunset Avenue, thea north on Leilani Street (or Puolani Street), then east on Lake, and then west on Kekuana`oa Place, this would represent the majority of traffic or where backups could occur. This is why the traffic study focused on impacts at the intersections identified in Section 3.7.2 and in Appendix 2 of the EA. Comment 3. In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place, Kekuanaoa Place is very steep. has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase l and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in fht TIAR, which focuses instead on irnpocis along Queen Koahumanu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips September 13, 2021 Ms. Candace Hailed Page 2 of 4 to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 3: Kekuana`aa Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all other Kona Vistas roads, including paved swales ❑s sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact an Kekuana'oa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuano'oo Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is cornpleted, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on K8kunna'oo P: ace during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak ,seriod. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuaria`vo Plod; every 4 i-inutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Comment 4- This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts. such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse iirnpoats of Increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure. like Kekuana'oa Place. Response 4; Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that wauld caacur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for an island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potenh al traffic impacts to Kekuana'oa Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phose ll outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and P peak hours, respectivelyj. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts {Section 3.7.2 of the EAS. Comment 5, The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The applicant claims, "The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way, storrneater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic 'impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules, Resg2nse S. The fes, describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health... The summary statement quoted is included In Part 5, Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment G: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA"s reliance on the TIAR, which faN to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 6; Intersectian within the Kone Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local September 13, 2021 Ms. Candace HaHetl Page 3 of 4 residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 7: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR, Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponenfial relation. Response 7: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show can increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lang mange Tronsportation Plan forecast projections for 20201 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used 1% from the 2025 LRTP forecast. Comment 8. The TIAR does not recogni-ze multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 8_ It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will hove 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, cr be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus, The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise carid mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily horsing was tiled since it provided a higher volume output, This lana use has a very low standard deviation and an R- squcared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the bast projection used by the traffic engineer. omment 9: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kracahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repoi 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low repcded vehicle voluma of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Koahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10% variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. R_esrsorlrse 9: The most recent Historic HDOT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahurnanu Highway section between Nam Kcailua Road and Hualcalai Road (north). Cour traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HOOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 1Q: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalal Road (North} is Inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. September 13, 2021 Ms, Candace Haled Par ue 4 of 4 The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Quem Kaahurnonu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response I - The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states. "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warroO5 shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are Cather considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increose in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geornet6c feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may, be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. miche le.lefebvreCq"steantec.com cc; Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From: Ed and Janet Tang <gtang60091L gmail carn> Sent: Sunday, October 04, 2020 8:04 PN4 To: Plarring Internet Mail subject: Royal 'Vistas Attachments: Ruyal Vistas.pdf Please find my dcclarativw; rogarding tht proposed l oval Vislas develnpi-nein below. F-d,.%,ard Tong DT( 1 •11%AII()\J 11 v I ,iJr�a.J.�•�.1t1��I�1 tri � ytr�'�—*�N��l�l_�- i�.ti-�i�.� l'r;t.:� •;Jl���i.;��{r�:}. k`,.dl� w i,°t �i is4�.11^., tsX;J1 4yi I f�1ti4 It 7 111--- 1.1)1** 11rLI;t:': Ih:u is Ilx- i4ik% m of t'bt: rwndin'- I ira;t 1"Ii1lr+tiilii1emial %ul-nu ttiM I~t Rin, al %'rst.0 F{r.rea.Sing Vr;r,.1't Ta% Mar, i`«% `s,;. 0l 7-rr W I °t'a 16. TO, r'21 I' l ?, 1 (x-•11' 1 +i1!�. ,a�IIdJ ; t. 11.' I `i4'rtlt Jbirrl;t 1IS'wa'! %t:rtt" io( I Ikku.at'r .ii'ro, ; , rte 1kr:s iruII% xq %rvII Jai. aI` cv,% m% imt.•re r m 1'4'd� I - ) 1 rt-stdc %►ifItin k bI,) AL Ititsta. e"{ cm the NorK,) c.J !wW &vutopuK- k pmicct In such .jva lI!t: w.. I have #itslhwW krrmv1ct;1pt; M Ila- fool %irle, I.1cL. j%1%1 k4"i.I .trt,1 tir.,1kd0 iktiltlti t11t"wta! iI cipII:. t u1%sti r - i .It+ m ? I #ta■,.: rwrv"cd 01u tom. -:at, mj. 1)KNI I- 1.: ,�VIROiN'+TNTAI 0,!;F,,047\7 ;nclsn#imj,, IK- Irrllfc: ImGuwt Arr:fl%mtr RrTkorl h% Issl h1 Irrtcrri attJart,Jl tl, zvd Jul`rI;':i Lad rkt.a+ �•..! ,t4 .^tl,kcrki��.' int IIP IJtt �,„r- �" r'��'`:Ftt-M`•�'�t�"'"r'7 4f +t��F"�.5�l�tiT I .trn a{�•c!Ii��i3�. AN ow tralfic tIi]p e" !-111 %kt1bin .arltl k%it rt;,i.1i thi Ki. Vwx .hat :lrc oot "111 I* or ACCllf= w.`!Lcd w. tfit: :"1T,,. Impact `nalti us Rc(%,ri :tri V rho titif %I I raI-la In i pwI +e.::.,m.s RvN, ,rt .ar_• tirx•ain th4• Ivdv o! tiw Dlkk %I f I 't VIR NS-IF?a'TAL ASST a pp 48 67 ;rwd 7I in lilt K0jkj V$tJ.Aw tir,:M �', i,�tatt. 1.1k ,,rt};x� projccl rc,lrt's on IN use of a Kli'k LV'11 .oa PLLit V. til. hi Lie` taacc-S tido :o i r%,zc i:u 1 ;1r 1'rwrcJ-4-d 1fPYMc :m:r inp lr!,m I"h:Lw I :triol I"la.e •, t "r,,tr : wt'rtw' R�3v:tl 1'i�r:t�, Ifs'+9r�A�,E! N-514-vt iw 1f4mL-Altt:4W!% It 11ic F ;fit .I mil—tc horn, g.:wx % °,is P: -p «�Ft • %h wh ftir mw% Insicad in til° `}: r-, 41,-•,.:� K:.whun—wnra I i.:eht4.1+. o x71 L L?PLC?1Wdi khr.ti-idd1ng numCsa: va e%:We imp, it, ,..•11.v3W til►K1151" on w� 11 rpt 4wni rkillj!C 1 I rn.'i t`+m.-CsTIIoil (k, irk:--Jcr1ts .!11Mr-, K Cktl.n. L>� h"t;ta:"1: ! ,+lrk;I& ihai ,he I' ronin ` I r4-runmc-tet %&-,uld regtitre Lhe apphti:ani io ht I)Ft- 1 I h'%V1KLPN%19 %,IAt XIFN1 r0441n,c.,••... ",-mIw!,_.."1 "•°_. Wl Itcf,.. i.'r♦''=L'? va �,'�e�Phd.A�'� :IRfV :i IN ,4JJ['d: .14 k72d7'�,"1 4 ,ir s +A� (a• r, rJ jQ,­Li, e t'ILI -.°r 11 )1JW,1ti Admini.tt-i6 Rtjic-. 9n,,Ik..riJ156r.:° .L44;Ir, •, ,11.1.b ., 1! _ rjfttiI "I F.NVI'[t[yNMENTAI.1,S 1 1 l t3t�'nri. �,r^ ,-nl ti%ou d ut1 l" V%1•.ritw 14511-t'•4Id, Irlil 11 1'9 _►1si4i°'• airw itw Ik, ,1 2 1, r,:7,t I iii bU K, U2 Fl r.,J d1C(1i.kT%l-, !I5 t Minn <rvitc-, It i". t ^-f10LIN 111L._SN11.511 1411 I.1"Ft' [;R %I I 1 %V ROS MfN IAI. ASSESSM!-N 1 to Cad (v jddro&�.�, thk7 I`w11cwcal r dversce I1rila WIS Of Lrti Flim: u.&ill s,0, jnKtm,l c%ivring IF fm-itruojr,,, K'Ari:14).1 o., 111,tvc. w Pic f?RA I I ' VII{1'INAil *% I ".1 %SST I impiit:t.s , [?It- in the 417111414[ I A 54ImhC"t t11C pfolmI titiLILA ILI 1411.1 of l{!JF NfurIlud rJtalrverir' IL•T/x°. i ,"I �+a,hh, %i_Laoh the \Pr iwalll wlLjmr,, "I `s� I's,I� �:: Pro, A:,o ",L uA n„i publj, c..tllh art art 5l► k�.. 44L.4ald IV dl, -fro -.Cd of Wr ilsj:rwl.L: ,IRPOUrti-, Ir-.dfl 6 r;,rlso.hi, have been taken rntcl t;3refull cons i F1 jr) p1cat-.t rgn ” Emphasis ad (Jed This how coWusion does n(A wArevs fx)Ienbal eJVH-as- 1111pd4j% as Ietltfired by I'm riLY I I - " I x I 1. 1 11at%Jlr .5. t'll�i'•akr4.Sri10 t:,11� e, I 111� I'k::r:l,:F:; lIVp'AftIII, II th, ,l.i r `r ,LLL j+r tt ,: k1It X, . I 1 NV!iI(tMI".1I NI q'4I,%i �S%i II N, l', lt);t th' vsI \1 "ffitiIL Iiulm.:i knL-Niil Itis' xin -;%h:i h Kv, Ihc Sir io,kpn_ Lk IIwlilt. ICS s tai [Lire its .1Y la �,:w .�,I�cv, tr:lf:ti, g{"1P I, �. t.I,oir s!,c b,t 1'.1 yL"t�l.ta aa?�II•.:•,r.,r. an 1lig front L�K- m, t. Pik: I `t1 T ralTit Ilta �..'11n�31��sra Fiti"Tr,rs �++a � ���¢t�tf1 r:aaa �,C I�.. in ci+nxru%t 1"a 1. "�11�Y�tati �� k+. 'hc '019 w lilt],' I,ne :nck7 nj; I rjlfik Iill I3 , f �iY11t±.NC iiepi in. II ralfic i;mgc,: iuu, 1'+ IY.-t) •A'I1,41: % L te, ,;iowit m r , In .9 n,,n-Iincalr. c kyww lntial rcl:atios. c l ria `� 4 "�k I r.11l'Ir irup.."t Aiwil, rias J�%7vx' Joe-? TkA rc� ,: I ., ,::-,III'P:r1cf"Woln.11 htomwnt! charactimmcs o) In I Iaati:Iii aI;C04ng I( :I:n%tI% ILII: Irw,l 11" r�'! I"It , r �' 11.11 1. tlariilti a .Iti1I !a- hilts nvril+trtAlo to kwll`Ic+W oof thk Prork:+rt d TwgslL!�: I . 11 SllocI Il,"i+5+r' X411 {I'! N OILIF1W .rd '},i� .� %1-11I =,_ h. - "v..?['f� 'ti •r.! i (I,Y�.X 11 t.a3hUfn"U holhvo .l., on LIU: Apn[ +I1 '1119, ,'1 ir:.l \k., r ?1]Z�I. 3 `wttiCICI F. y IFk9lllkl!{ k w irk] the —'I'll $ '1f�'i.IEitCf itl:,,wo RcIN,n wh:ich Tvrwr: J 1 r +�ehrck:i I'cn 3:rrt+w, 11.9 i s .'t1tA. ids uitx-hday % 14xr mitia.I6r11 I+,tip aj'A,tUiJ s AlickC-%iihilnse is?' &l MAwall Ws will I IZ,ury 4 o t!i'IIa` SSFM l lr,054 11T1',ML1 �.Mk IIS Rl:-� tri, %%111611 AW I>l 43$'-6" 1IIh1l1:k 111411 , at ° 31—M The iJ1I-R:rvs,cc rn Icsrt:w 1 f`iL,#L' L�tJJI Ic�ra i 131 1t a,,1r1t1titt I[M'e. 4:1J1 tT1�Fl _c1� r.#9i� �' 4^1c'vj sril rim-tl}-r1:ar I.. Ilt'L :4�i,,',IliiYr4"rl�iail�Yll 1'4 SS[ %t 11,Iffw IFT',.r'oef krui1'4'T, 1�41x'�rz 141'r .1 r4+llrlci:lk4siv s �+'1.1i-`Ln k�0.:6'F.I"it l"M1"Fyi !.i ki=?'�'llr�yr ilk .tt'►�i �I tt�a.laL�, 4F�ss,� I ij6U1� i4 tn�l i.Y?.'t'ri s".;"i11 N't 111, (tree rjaffic COM,dOF �i a'L ,'k'1E111i� it7�tl x:1:+3 v1�S#TTilrl f �11[ f�rtl:lrf7 rtrLiLtiI15i1]2cj r C�flt tF�371i 3.iftt5 aJ FCIi'� 6k'mi4;.Al> ;car -.i -,o%c Crrm} nt. I 111a' roi4aaiimendafa'c4n by SSFM Ir.,I] W ImI,.m.t .%1 al.%'- !'!:. t, -,r m"win itL,rtnti :.1 Elie int ru"ti:CLi1IL o i_)ucca k.3ahjj j4q-J Iii hU-.J� ,Ir1al KlAakim 1110111M.11. I's ITi iJcq kare. Whk rt .l-. bcrv, an 7171Lr`.0"wtati rl P 54' m+'rc: r1 :3 I1 n.1 %virr-ir 1 IlndL'r :lil condili n—s. 71 :.iia ulJ K imunit",>1 foT _SjUd% a[W L�Cll ;aa +�C .a �r .rl:a! tsar 1r151.11k;14x��Lt. 1'hi gird iarr �.Irc„ veil I hc• Ca.uLrrh:ltc-tt hs. We pmiw,rwd pr,�tc:t P Irl wllrrt- IlK• 01,111 l nkiroWFILol U Atiti{•,r+i1IIMI Wo �sr%l TrjIll, 6m Ium m Anal iN ItCVW &W!, FlOI Gyra•1a•r7! '411"11CIL! III. ir, ajj$hj, laC1^. 1;1,j 'jr jIN—,IN -.J.WI :Mt;11 IflI ;u-1', 4t'A7 UJIVJ,,U1 L.11I a°s�:cCllt,7'w t7mCl.l.^+illiituxr� ;ttM�1 rl'tiLS�IL��" IT��iT► mmtcn�.s►�,ll tralt�t-,::ua 4� CI11Cr mut►l�:'»ts+;*c� .st1�1 ra`�+uli Lm7 1 &VII.43c wx10 r1clull4 o! IVIlure LhaL thh jorr"1001M, I3 Ml D.V'4 M.d F�, �IS�IL:4- wYall-1, ll_1 i4..el •r, ���1 y,'7 r�. r Vis, -•^_•-- `r17, L%l n lc f] 1.1.114 R. 1,.7 "u 111 [ l %KAI15 "v ()I { I �. .. it � ' +,.. � ".t,�y f.,4,�JJ7a't :•f il,lw4a. I. �4t:J'w" i4l � I.1".ti,x: I 1 ��� ~,:Lt.r1?r"itii r.rr3�i .Ic'",4 r: ,s I t�;t' .,obl'QL .. klac I,�_ 1,1+J�4 I1--tl1 I.rii-"Dojl#?] r''I.LI +-°.'•°"� 4'a•14r �r; �r1UIT ►1 11r kali ,ai 1%;Al I ION-J� 'IV- I`rrr;C•Ct 'I &L kti Kr,. "rirr'4 I •e 1 7 -r, -A17 II �rY -11- {)I .6-021 Kolw D61: IRA, Il.tl,+J. St.1t,: i.,I 11 ;1k\.1r 4 tt�i�+lks Erik �t:�.1T�lI► �� v►t•!l a. rl►r.-r IM r1J} rnh�re�Y uI ra�.Il �+I`1,I�rir ! rr'weii• ti11hL11 tj 1r4',t, 14I'1LIlhL."j ,,I 141,; l.t,rlkr'-vA hili Oe,el„pt4C1ar I,T,.fc,.I i, ,:,,,Is I..1:1 tww fprstfixidknowelWp t11 tr- rldl4I%%'.1a;V rar•tl Anj 4Lltg.! l,lr1r1 wwl-talil I.'NUIN IN-rkli'l If r%tlf-4 4.. art lu +j sk4. I hj%c ra:i'rcwL%.'thv I°* oJor:� l RAI I I N IltO"0111:M AI r I S."'Al I '�"{ am r :li'. }7ClrIY I -"1od.'1It411 1,. .r`,a �L I I,� •lL':`r t. i :1ti, ti::•tt,r:I Il rag;,IJ rust Off AI IJ U:tSt,WtCd 4 M. -.14C r: hazard, ��Lst srr.' r:,,t i l.:..,,..i ;.i:,,Irc .•,.'ti in Ir1� l?r;a11 F rrtilrrrrvrll. wrrril it :+nrrer-nt d+rr- thmool . � 1 .JJt1:�ii�tsti, ria.;r ;rll�..,T�.�;•�II� I,i,:b�l In Irr.. II; 4.: I lriII I j I % in In mcm L.LI A , ,::r i dtku, ,III, li# uwo, ,uI iiia rjcL- uid 1 %Wl. 4Iua the fluor.",--arj dr Iim °r- tuir. iltorviviv ,Irr►I It r.ff-,titrjlI jPI Ik- tML-Vll1%.1 � p ;pc'- nJLIrjm.11,,eFJt.tl L.a.rtnilt ICJ% Mu-an!RP1Ui rt:1)I. LO N. t.lkL:T1 6;:j .• A ir111h luiurL. 1r I uAc't,--unJ JT, such L: irk: ori ,t . %, bull IC.AJ t,.ti ulzj:I4rf'L,l Pr,PICCI it I r_ ;?FSlrm1'. c�1I'rL'r Ca7r,r`+, i t° N Ktr,L CON, ILISlon +-% rho or .lL"L.C`VI!nf - Jir0H,Tv% 9p;lrs,rrj:k:[iare %v IIIji [:Lpj7 wS; ::. ; 4 °.' • ;E i:IstJ �s`;iitl. 'i[ a rumtriiLuc, d : 1Jrsll 91ref+•P}rrli'TiT.J� � 4""'I71C'!7i 97:Lt'[ �kC fJ'Llti , T i �hti}ry1 �t"ilt":ajJ%. uhat mfrisir1Hi%'m 'trr ft4.UIr il 'Al tU, 71:10 4}x (,1111ii a draitm.p: 5Lsic if 3734 hink flito.. [iipurserk:T11% 'S., Ili (U L,c 6,L -rt. &-CjJr". MJF;JL:l PCIIJI t 0r'jvrjufr. ihaYr Tito' c r4 LJ"iLc ry G Ill°I, l.•w.,t I II t\ 1 It Jim I.ue l Iani .I re-nk-rtIt, I K I *71,t \ I. [J', ILIhj I% I",I'l 1, i 'tIti! kl+ Is ! I.tr+ Jt' t.. NIJ LL •I i Lo" -I I llbk'[1!—J`11jL'L1 ILA "thIL sLhl,_ii 1'6[ 'Ili ,�i`•�1l1•,' I Ir:l�t I'::t Yrel[11`.IL:II1_1. 'L_ ITTT1ItI,:,! Fw I� n;t! tilI'm"Int:.VTl 'prk l;ew ��IV ht:w `ii':-. i iy i�.'i"I Itptro �• o .... x.11-i.Ill�� NOnh Kell�DIS,.r1Ct. ki:ati,r'�u'I EA and `�IcCit Ilay�tiaul ,-, ..1:,. "1111.11k X. %4r 11 AN Adel I'. i1'tt 11lk:W*,t in tL.tI I*roj%,r1a I wsitk 'Aidhit) t+,. �.lYtt.Ylrt. r•1 1°�... Itd,�lhttia.".l l,tlkl .�� ►.°I,iI'•rly,.i i11 I'�rtt�k.a°) In titk`�I L'.II+s1:,IIlI�'�; I. I;;,IItII tIk4 m.[CLII"1: ,II 011: tttllt•441111 1Jk L, xkd iu1Lld.t1t'ti A ouki W:+I.1k, �wwrvtu It calk# afocm Eta do w. 4 1°,I.. r," it -w,,,,.1 11W Dk AI 1 1 %w 1 ISI )\%It 111 ti�Ml \ I rix 4j :Ihlti ut rL, L'�,x,�! -"1�(t,1,-�, •i•t'I&�►.,il-'L I -.JI lit11 1.-1In,;14 ler :r1,11 1K4 If i. II.Wh 1,M'It.3i ,,dirket`-, ,17'!O!rt-,I If: U111% Ill , t' Th': I}i.I,' F:3%uiinnil.'rII;II 1vc-.,%im u IIt,Iru.rA,IL-%I Yl"[s N.V Irl, lhh�itiil -I 1 .1 Int ai%z.-o 111.51 it. b-it«l:rlw! cvid aoc "41S[ ihat 1.hv hiftil t'11'o•f PaL,,wO Hs Ik,. 11+4:Vl (_1.111, fI'LJ-ltl'1`. IY] IIUJ� ItulllWk:', Ilflhk Ii.dILLI.+,! �III,IL', i!14111t11tIt' 74lt 1 65,11`. [lul „r►' t Mae.li7l u—ite1% Jc.V rI hc,j 4i- iiiIIITurnI 6k; -d 1ti !n the .n'I"t1_el^_tlALPS- IL°°,:al 'a Lkl 4`%nilifod in NLet'", LK-, I)r-.tl"t I w.OmmialwWA I he I;tik:: 1-ki �,IPdt iq an import. -Mt I.,.w _I, :r _ A[_°.,.1 wbd xtvh-.wiII g!I:al Ct;t111rt• frt"ll pro. Wv,to-n CtOf11JR; I [IITh. Ihil ;.0 Lou; t1k rkpl,:t,, ;7 IkilJJ110J:%,k11,►r I Ka-,: )nr iM![r'rm5 teen Ih I',-Alualron .tntl anal , Ivorrlt+ri c%i !%N I oTm I'o"u Z t, I[isum iN, 1,)taI, I rt,inr imrtt_:.w,;.4 .!,,, l.:.,. r iotdjs,'L,..: S:itlic1,-nr 1:tti'tw,iru! ..lt LL)ti 'i,4, w,,j, h &,.a9 t�c Iry71b:w,,`m I1,imalIan l: tIII ur,Y t.`� .:'-_0L1 , a.-.1-,;. �_. --11. u kir-r.Titind. ICt;Ilonc priTcrl% Y4 a :aiuntman-, th,. DT, II'l I rt ir,�nM,Cnt.-tI ` -'T, Ii P'.I. �i ti -%,i1141 Irr :t �[:Ai:�m Lh, [oci ,,N[L data 'cc F%cri aim l rfl [Jw 11oluaYlf%l '- I.:,, , .Fr., ,(,owf1T L7f1 the e�Vbp;it jxlv,:clN 4J,:Ci fC ufultf rVlt-lAN 411 Ik•fitur4 IhaC the I0C1",L%JnV tS' ItL$k fl.lynj,',. ��,,� i,� ♦tad} 3 allow era communications with Mr, Tom Pronator Stone about the twirl ti Fwanl-1 [I -.,q Ms with a Kano Vista Goard members Below are Md-nMLJnjC@Idcns with Mr- Tiorn. PD:iaku Rona abcLit the tw, nvvalls and tlie vAide with a Kona Asta Board rnaw4�rs On M on, i u I '1, 85 5 AM Tem P ohnim Str, inA -i> wrc tf answer t' -;�jar-dlnq thq WaIIS 80 Nat all I%,.- 1�' Ad 1, 1 'S And in ar,. VVIK.X, JIOLI M.:zinUDv, m:,ving L-if!c;,. "ll I :LJW tLIEII ,I an v! T -i: I% - and 1 7; r A L ��Jletr ad the 06"', .1 Un Mor., Jul 1. 2019 at B: � 5 AM john To rn. Thank yot: t+ +r :'O,, i i i i t!icl tome to edLICme rop. 11.4 greatly appreciated. Tie histcrV cif Holum. oa Is 4W� remarkst)w. ave a;'ily !mrAk-hedl Iho NUFfaC5 -1 1 11 a v ta.' ;ILaclt POT, i a a 1 ,11a Rolu'l orkwall c -;pies Ar any 0A -:rkjrh:-ir�. ';k- OWOV i5nd grateful, JOii '1, 2019, 6:35 AM Tom wrote' I Jut beeil in bi7ven Unklfj through all my recon— infc r;� re ) , �600 L4idi Slide belfaUEie i'TO Pe.... 701-,-c m2f arc -'-a A ;w' n� c-', --,-i tt7j! cultural landscipe in ills afea Uver the '.XG YrS,.l 80d With it Fn� Onds,25-ae so I.q -,an of my 'c ftarw; 8 FA it 11 rTfC fOCtAS J tx-mrounity rapf&r —'pe it-�!grate the if cu I to v '-Mrth t"lat T&T fall co Mail - of hast existed, Thi hftp,0ftai1.yahvuxar70 1'r.- : r, fir afe 56JI 7 -f this great 4x uWlex. We :mlfiq to Wtfa sfide 2nd 4r.,r. �J hF-. mmPlax mid hovthis wouic, on i:.;.3nc IL "A INS P"j I beljeV� Mth Hawaiian ctjL:' , ;i Amftnna architectura Ila rck", .... .. .. � Ou rmbed someonL- LO Jr. in -du pth resear-c-In, pfiarwe p r L. ani; . cian ni.- cian discuss this Cana Kakah uro prov ded the most detaiki, i KnowWge, interpretation, and Lmde -stand 1 n a of T h9K,% r4 111; r r. Me Ra ha aha'a Turn P64akuStope Kanalu (K38) is a S01 c 3 noo prQfii organizaitor dedicated to culturai & ocear educalien basked rm vad i tic nis of Carr k ii rju no. an . ..... VO L L Vleqjkle QW, -,I but If 0 -,! dlit�t AiOn vie h 111 Imemv i i!.,. Kanalu (K38) is a S01 c 3 noo prQfii organizaitor dedicated to culturai & ocear educalien basked rm vad i tic nis of Carr k ii rju no. 01 Stantec September 13, 2021 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tel: ( 808) 494-2039 Mr. 'Edward Torg Via email jtong60091,Q-�g ail.com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kana District, Hawat'i Island Bear Mr. Tong: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 4, 2020: on the Draft Environrnentol Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I dam specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Carnment 2: In the Kona 'Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roodwoy, Kekuaraoci Place. KeWanoo❑ Place is very steep, has linilted sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahunnanu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoca Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuana'oa Place is a County -awned road built to County standards, with the some specifications as all other Kona Vistas roads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana'oo Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana'oa Place to Royal Vistas is rot planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuona'oa Place during the Aim Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle an Kekuanc'oo Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2021 Mr. fdword Tong Page 2 of h Cornmenf 3: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects an public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores there. It is a serious ornissicn to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing Infrastructure, like Kekuana`oo Place. Response 3. Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project, These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7,1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana'oa Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekrauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AMI and PM peak hours, respectively. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, "The 'Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; stora'nwofer would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideratian in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not add-ess potential adverse impacts as required by Chcpter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Admir �w`rcative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and Reasons, and accurately surnm arizes the impacts detailed sand analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment : The Plonning Deportment should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Visfas subdivision arising from the project. Responses 5: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since these internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic, Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. comment 6: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a Porgy -linear, exponential relation. Resoonse 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation jHIDOTj counts did not show an ircre:�se in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lang Range Tiunsportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to corm up w:th the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain haw Witcher Engineering coot 2%, our traffic engineers used 1% from the 2025 LRTP forecast. September 13, 2021 Mr. Edward Tong Frage. 3 of h Commenf T: The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle Mips atfributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response -7: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with tour cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers SITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and law -rise and mid -rise was considered. Law -rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output, This land use has a very law standard deviation and an R squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projeciion used by the traffic engineer. Ccmmenf 8: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahum anu highway can the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 W[tcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repel 1, which reported 1.057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volurne of 853 is cilso at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1060 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10% varication generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. Response $: The most recent Historic HDOT count [available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahumanu Highway section between Nani Kailuo Road and Hucalol❑i Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 20119 was compared to the 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fclrly comparcble. It is bard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similor to these provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 9_: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kcahumanu Highway and Hucalalcai Road (Northis inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that puss worronts but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahurnanu Highway sand Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be priorifized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (UTCO) states, 'The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal; such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where September 13, 2021 Mr. Edward Tang Page. 4 of 6 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many cf these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Comment 10: 1 am specifically concerned about drainage. The steep topography,. historical rapid stormwater run -Taff and associated damage present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the Draft Environmental Assessment, i am aware that this project will have serious impact can the immediate and surrounding area. Response 10: Kona Three LLC is not aware of any carnage to adjoining properties, including Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway, from water flowing from the subject property, Comment 11: The DEA does riot disciss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood. A proper environmental assessment cannot leave meaningful details to be taken care of in the future, As I ur,dersland it, such circomstances would head to "inlawful project segmentation arnongaiher errors. Response 11; Section 1,2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the Iwo C;_).jr-iiy-owned parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify that on T K (3) 7-6-21.19, "Infrastructure during Phase 11 of the Proposed Project includes installation of a cvlvert system along with utilities and roadway across the ditch to extend Kekuana'oa Street, which would then be Medicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the Kona Community Development Plan's iCDP's) ''Official Transportation Map." For TMK j3j 7-6-21;18, the project includes infrastructure for channelizing a portion of this ditch and includes a road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the CDP's "Oflicfal Transportation Map." Figure 2 has been revised in the Final EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages in the Project Area. Additionally, the text in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that trona Three would prepare a Drainage Plan to ensure that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage plan which would be reviewed and approved by Department of Pudic Works. Text has been added in Section 3.3.2 of the Final EA to identify possible options for addressing the issues from existing flooding. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Comment 12: A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastructure will comply with government regulations is insufficient. At a minimum, the Draft Environmentol Assessment must be revised to show specillcally what infrastructure improvements are required to tie into the County's drainage system and how those improvements will functicn. September 13, 2021 Mr. IFdward Tang Page. 5 of h Response 12: The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design of the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at a later date, the potential impacts from their construction are analyzed. CornmerYt 13: l am specifically concerned about archaeological significance. I do not conkler that the archaeological studies in support of the IAEA are adequate. I am aware that substantial evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject parcels includes features of the Holualoa Slide, including rack walls that are inadequately described as agricultural walls in the archaeological studies offered in support of the DEA, The Hcolualoa Slide is an important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if uar7naged or destroyed, Response_.1.3: As described in Section 3,6 and included in Appendix 5 of the EA, two Archaeological Inventory Survey [AISp reports were prepared for the project. As pard of the AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evaluated for their significance. The AIS$ were conducted following Hawaii Administrotive Mules §13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sites were considered 5ignific❑nt under criterion d bec❑use of the information that was learned during the st:idy. Documentotion of these sites cs part of the AISs ensures that their intormation is not lost. The documentation clone was adequate to Mtigote the project's effects to the sites. Regarding the rock walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 24211 ) docurnented. This road is not very straight, hos obtuse, angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of a haluo. Also, the wails were 1.0 meter in height and is similar in constructed to similar historic era rock wails const-ucted along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. The only other parallel 'walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of a land Commission Award (LCAj #3660. Addifionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the same gulch. It is unlikely that this is a hblva course since the parallel walls emply into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a holua in the project site. Comment 14: l base my concerns upon the evaluation perforrraed by Tom Pohaku Stone, a copy of which is attached. The IDEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological features can be understood let alone properly preserved. The DEA must be revised to address the location, data recovery and preservation of the Holualoo Slide components present on the subject parcels. Restponse 1Q: In the email provided, there is reference to "the portion of the hclua at the Holua iron [that] has rock walls on both sides" and refers to parallel September 13, 2021 Mr. Edward Tang Page, 6 of 6 walls within the proposed development area, possibly Site 31 182 f=eature 2 and Feature 3 walls which ore LCA #3660 boundary walls. Primarily, Mr. Stone's email responses provide accurate information concerning the cultural importance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the near -coastal region between Kailua to the north and Keaohou to the south. The remains of many of these complexes were first mopped by Hoary Kekahuna. Mr. Mone correctly states the religious and social importance of he`eh5lua and its connection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures along the coast and in the near coastal region. However, the complexes are located more than 1.0 km west of the project area and there are no remains of royal, sacred or sociopolitical complexes, or a hdlua, within the project area. The existence of ca holuo within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Stene. As discussed above, there is no documented oral history, archival documentation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a holua course existed within the project area, We sincerely appreciate Your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantee Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre. Ph.[). michele.le febvre,� s_ta ntec.cor n cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maijo Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mari. Ashley From: Mark Powell cmarkp50@att_net> S@nt Tuesday, Cktober 05, 20241 4:30 PM Ta: Planning Internet Mail Subject Royal Vistas Reusing Project EA comrrwnts Attachrribentsy Royal Vistas County docs.pdf Attached are 3 ddlerant comments about this projeCt. Archaeological, Drainage, Trafc- mah al® Jahn in658 A DF( IARA HON 01- ARC IIIAVOLOOICAI, l..1(7 H\ POW -'- 1.1.. dccl:arr: 1. 1 am :i resident ol'Konta VMas sulxdivitiiuta. C'ouraty of l-javvai-i. SLals: vrl•-la►kai°i I'he prape� [Ind devc1opm.:nt project that is the subject of the pending Craft ia_nvirunrnental Assessment suhmitt& by Royal Visa:as IIt uina l'rojeet'Fix Map Key No— t?) 7-h-02-1-vl(5. 7-€i- 021:"Jt7, 7 -4h -W :J]N.and 7.6.1)21.01•, \ arch Inn` }Incl, Ilawd'i tl.0and. tit'.11c011laWah affect:, nay perion ally° as wAl ,as till,W, r,-� m1t•ik`.�t Lig .�.:.al prop ri , I residc withita hit t.*a ririIv of the Prt-+lx7Wd (;and kte',elcxprttelit project. h7 tits( -h capacIties. I have tlrsthnnki I-aio-wic�ge of'the I11Ilowing facts and could and wauld testify thereto} 1f cal led z psi to do so. _'. I ha*�e �LLc ie f tlat pen tlin t}RS I.- I' l : l'It�{3L 1ila;N t . ! rLti''ILSS:1�1ka,N I r�aad utl(whaivols. I wn cook- rned whout; the hi!- wN and she win4l.wevered vrtii !cts that ctas.rld he OSI Verb lll,r.Iv 0111.1 aa)trre hLuid , xcnvaatim is 11CCLL.L. k , L.- u; nt.`.la'iC' "itc 01-11% Ove: L em waa., IaI<rr -1v .;crmched doing li Jahi hand cxcavaticyri lJdq,,-i +. I do not consider that the archakcologlcal studies �,I:�r �.l +•a ., rt, P. -rt ol`Ihe 1 r:3} I .rivi.ronnientaal Assessrr enl are .adegUatc ChM:01- .4. 4. 1 tarn aware that ssbs tial ei�d+ence exists thal the il.md encom sed by the ,ubjcct land parcels inJudes femurea A the 11olualoa Slide_ including rack walls chat are inadeclutat lv des riK-d ns igricttltuxal Salts ill tlneU ha4, 10jr,.ical 3tUWCi offsred in sLippart ttit tho Draft Crnvirt Timenta[ .Ass ; r,nesat. The llohialoi 5 W is an important llavvaiiaai ;-ultwal -Uid arrhaeoltyleal feature frtarn pre•-Wesrern contact tithes that eiritl ( be replaced it"daamaged or destrovcd- 1 Skilm: I hTase my cunr:crtis upon [Ile evaltiartiM Mid ;.urt3lVgi�i PCTfOMIC h'' 1 cpm P011AU In ,Ilm. the Drafl I:]yUirerrrmenial AssessnjQpt ctc 31ut discuss sufircht3c fack, and analysis such T tip) ehc aimptrrtant Ha►,aj'ian cultursl and ai'clkiortlni�,leal. Cz«ture:i circ Iv tmid rww-d_ let alnne properly pron- d. old a minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must K, revised ur m -term;, Lhe 1000tiOn, .lr[U rQCOVC and prUervati(in M'Ihe IJolwiloa !slide cumponc:iIs pr,csc]iI I"I ilea 1 deet w urderpermiq (ifpgjwy 11ML tltt: f(PN Uirrg; is tr].rw. I ied: Kailtrir-Ktsm I la-wai`i. �t ti kc XC 202(). @�!liriil.l`6` YC][ltCd C1ErJ17"r"": 0 1)i• (TA R.A 1 11)N l)1 1)RAINA (J' I.JO] IN F'()AT.I.J..dociurv. I am a r deiv pit Kenn Visors .,uhtiivisinr, k.oumv oI' Ilaliai`i. Stale cwt`[law aN. lice proposed lardth!VC]opmerit proOd Lhal I� 111%; 5ut11"Iiik Lhu p;�iiding Draft Envirounixial Assessment submined I Rovul V istas Housing Prom.% Tax Map KIv Nos. 0; 7-6-02 1:(] 16, 7.6. 021.017. 7-6-021.-01& and 7-6-021 -019 Norlla korai Pi a1 ml. Ilawai'i Isln 1d. svmi ori iliwx-i :tt9rcls IncIrersti�nawlJr is, �v lk its ��fi"Irrl s its}' interest itl real Property I reside within I Ialf "v1ilc 1:Ikin! LvI tale tllw I�rc�1*�,:«l IWId Ovvelulttltent pruiect. III such capuwjlies. I have flu'sthru-XI kiiiit%IL• ALI ,,''tlt4 i-AIov., g 1aOs .111d 0,101d .tttd WMAI ?em i(v ihervio it"c-alled ri1w to do sn. =. I havc iv% ic«.d tht ; nd.ing DRAFT EN-VIRONNMENTAL ASSESSMENTand a uacHyients I ant pc�c'ttirall� %{i11 ,'�tt'�1 .lhdl.et' drainage;"runntt. water duality. gv)uTidNvalcr r:�hari c. t]ouding. I llcre is no drai nage plan that I could find. Proiccts mcd Lu h4vo: this rhm I List a.c �L a] Lcr. Tlavtie nunisler Iuildhi s apIwar 4) irzrvc rtjajor runoff that can aW tv the prob[em. . 11w itcep wpvgruphx . lustaru:al rapid st«rimsater t°tui-� iT"�xn,J .a;y. rll4tT �ianaa e present Nvard1 th.tt are not adequateIN add rmsed in the Draft I'Avir nnicntal Assess dhat 1 C(Add tinct. tl,trtof 4 I ;un aware that flooding has OcciLtred klabi of the high,v%a.v. In sum. the Draft F.Tv.-i mnmcmal Asscssrmnt d�vs not &SCUSs suflIOCTIL facts and amilyijs such thdi lh6e J,t-L;L:&.,ary draiciape impn vermLaLs aiid divcrsiuns,:ail bt tuiJcrslcW. A proper mviroarnental assessmcnL cannut leave meuringlul details to be lak-un care of in the future. As I understand it, such circumstances wau d lead to tmfa",fi)l project qV"J-nentc�tintt, P 'L17kmig 4)tit4t:r vmn) , A 1, -kw conclusion by the appLcart c:r accept'Htg aLAurity that m;ckl wi nfTast-,acture will Compty with �Vovem+gent regulutions is inwilkie.m. At a minlatnmit, the Drug Fnvkontxtcmal .• ssa :., wsmvnt musL he rcyiscd trr show specifically what intrwtrue-mt'e urrprovemomt are required is tie into t1 c Cotjmv's drainage systcm and how ttwsw 4upro tixrnts will function. I declare under Pmaity r�f pedu y that the [orCP-Oing is ME, t:}UtcId . Kuril uaT tic i i u, l i utwa i' i .. �p f ,�•�-� �' _. � , S giratLU.C. Rrit ted name-. !}II;:�,_ L 1 TJON O '1101 -HU i-:tt11N N)WEL.declare_ 1. I elm ;i resid•2111 of Kwolu;)t Som and live in 11v Kona Lista: ubdil% itir011, COLffit)' til' �1��ax-1. 4ta1:«: ati4ra 'a fhe prCrpe" jand dewe.lopment project that is thy; subject of Lhe pending Draft L.nvin)nmemal Assessment mubwiiLed try R�wal Vjstas IIOtising ?ru24cI Tax Mitp Inc} Nos. 1317414).2 t 9111, 7-6-021 W 7. 6-1;)2!:019. ind'O•(rd}_'1 A14 mffi lticam. FAAricl.. I Im"i-1-3 l lsind, Stm {,f IILLk :ai'r ttll�`ts me Pc asia]Iv ns we]I fa,, ;a[Wds my imerest in rail prop( rty, 1 residc williitl tltaI 'mile «I'1hc proposed land projcvj. In such c4ip;tJ6ei s. I hac iirwthKand kilo%%lt:jg,� 4)1,1k ft lInwiIng t'l7 t� :a'Id couIJ ulId ,kfmId tes T i Fv ihcreto iCk:aIIcd, i1pon It) do SU. ' 1 h;iVe 7c-, 4 � -...1 Jhc pcnclmg f]E,~AFT EN I1tUNNEN FAI. AN."d-,ti MIENT m lLading [lit f'r:^.I' :, i il,;:�, c .`. �_ i;. s RL:PiFr'i hY SSlAt lnterMltiottal. ►14Wd J0% 2(12(iand aattw -h tl m Appenjjx ? to 1he 1)RA T ENV1Rt]NM IN I AL ASSESSMENT. l am %peoifically concerned abort adworsc, traffic irnr)ains l)th mviLhir anti withom the Kiirtsa VilstLjs suhili..ision that ;ars riot fully or accmately addressed in theSSl=M "I`rafiic Impact Analysis Rei -ort. i•ral'1ic and the SSF10 T,afrtc ]:a,;Xact Analwsis Report. om discussed in the fwd% of thL! fm,Ari HNVIR NN -1 fs,N'•l AL ASS.L:, SNjEN-l. as pp 4N-56, 67 and 71. 3 lrj thv Kait,a Vkugs cobdiwi:ipai. tht: prupLx;ed prceci relies on the of a substandard roadway. Kckuana-va Nate Ktkimna-Da Place iS eery steep, 4ight distames true lar the grades. er[r+=spat c:urxt;s ;and N narx�rw with no cmbs, Gutters, of !tidewall�;. TN: impact ofincreased tr.tlfic irking 11Tim Ph.i,,c I Nall Please ? hu ldout; ;:sr tlx: ROIJ Visu, Ifousitrg l'rtyivo F, ivrJcgLm1elx oddressa:d in the SSFV Traffic ImNct Anal} is RrE,cart, which fcwwws inmead on irnpnc!• along, Queen Kaahumanu Hi�lmjv. I dill I"rti111rlttrlr' rOTICe-mO tlt t, adding rrulnerutrs vehicle trips ttb and from a ti t,„;tt ur-di% , ,! Will prC',l'rlI tianL,ers and wage,titrit lir rr"iclenrs alcino `ktrrtn 'on I cpnsi&r :11,'i !:: 1' ;iryraillt.- l)e' FU -firie t sha�ul�.i rt�%luirt the applic ni i,n addr°esg these conccros. RuN a. Vistas mad Nyder ,hnrrld follow Cowl} stanclards til`Muuka tt} Makw Vor3th a cipaliaed deter eC,1,rt at the highway -t, 1 ]w MAIA' FNVIRtjtiMENTAL r1SS1-.SSMl-'N'l ivgmres avniti.iiion 011 unnorag 01 hers. Wk-ep%'C xt'C'ongl4m). "111lia,-IN ,�)Wh ON fwPuietfir+li ef' C?�/t*CIS OF) 10110 1h ftltifitil',ti S v t: hupter I 1 -?1111.1 -1.t, IILiwaii :1 lminj,. trati�e 1� i[Ies. InstL!ad ol`sgikarel. aJdi-C-Ssir3Jw, issws.ltuw•evkx, Ow ORAVI' J:i VI[t(t'tMEXIA1. ASSESSMFN V sitt pI v ignores theme_ Clalmittg t1lat "Nu udterse sa cojiJ lry C.XPCIM' l sinLc dlr dC%,C1ulamtrrt M)Lrlel tttilire cxisting infraStrLICOUrr, pimidc iuiill he+using. and is M)t expected lea nnsull in substarclul �ieiIlaild, lea ('aatlnI ,vn ices."` 1[ iti ti c°rioua t -)mission is -pr the I)kA1:1 FNVlR(1NM14.N IAA ,ASS SStEil4' T 10 1` t lar addl`VS6 the Polemial advVi—S: impactrs of inaeKasing the, Use ail sutl5tatndBI'd CXi%'11IVV itirraStructure, like Kckirana,oa Place with yowig, children prL%!. - . Tire DRAFT E-:NVIRONNIFl` NAL ASSESSNIEN- ' dddmssew adver&-- tr.O-i ' impaetw only in the context of whether the prnjcc;t w•c u[d ffcovc oj&,r on silb ic' 1i tr�rh, T1W Arplii;anl clilms. "rola° Proposc d PrOjecl won:ltl ilei a Ieo public health is any u3y, totrttwat4r w4ru1d helrt+rt}tsriutels disposed ofiii Jrainagc 5'i -mc tires. I rall"ii� im a x have Pri en J11,L9 Lg[VfUj Qjj2SifjVr11tJon in proi�ct ddcawttgaz." Emphasis added- This bald conclusion doe nOT-LddrtIss pCaLential adverse tiT1prv; aLs t"etlttfred by C lu p er I I -2M.1-1 3. Ibvvaii Adrrini;trztive Ruljjz.. 6. The Plain inp DeFirtment should non ai•mp( the DFtAF1 F:'d' 1R0\Ne11ih: 1 AJ ANSLSSMF\" ''s reli€arce on the S!sFM TraffiImpact :' iwlysiis Relxrrt. which has the fallowing deficjer6e{ - 11. fsailaarc to;at1drv,,, ::1l4 rsc tr;itrk tn1;);aCIS IirMighctuI the vnrire Kona Vistaa j6sing from tht: proicrr: I�. I he SSF%4 Truflic Irripacl .Aralvsis Report uses a a'rtw1.I� rats sat' I°°I., irr contn. I to f14 '_° O pro- ili matt~ employed by Ow 2019 Wiichcr F.Ag!iwering Traffic Irtipaact Analysis R ptwt. Traffic cmmt'mjon iS very lciisitwc to fro w h reale in a non-linear. Qxrxineritiu.1 .rclatio n= c: 1'Ir;; Stil= I'lrtatlie Impact Anal slis Relx,rt docs noi reeognize multi-generaiional lrtsusitr : i laiar-acteristir s e ►ra;rncrta its I-lta"a!aii iati;%%)rding to census Jam ttrto li�cly urderestimates dailY WhiCly trips arlr6ul rhle io buildout Of th4 IIraapOW.- d prlxjoet; di "Ibe 41 praff-w Impact Anaulysi,� R6!Vorl w;rr plans an witisually IOW vehiCIe tulumv of 5 + vellieies Fiat• Nt)rthN'itnd Queen U11hurrtctrni highway cart the sclectetl dates csf April 30, 2019. a wccicday anti AUgu5,,!4_ 2(►1;), a 4atttarclav, cnntpa aeLl NvidT 01 1-018 Witcher f-agineea°itag Trcrflic lmpaad Analysis Report, whiub relx,riv—d I U57 vehicles rer .1cul aury 1.1 wid "i. 2ttl6, latah week Ljys. The ttrtca.SuaallY Itaav reP.lrted %ehielt vo Iun-ke of953 is also at v&,; wiih Fiprr 4 of thv 4SF4i TraMic Impact Anal tsis EdaV- irt, which shw6vs appror•im�aej 1+ 50 4•thivles Nr hour in Zia 16 liar :Northhound Queen Ka;rhumaaau High%Nay at 7 a.m. The dillcretacc iri volurni-, is nacre Lha ll cluab1e the maximirrrr 10% ►ariaiion generally actgted inday-u)-cert} rr cniumments and Oms urarctiebL. 3 C_ I'lie roc.-ommoinciitiov !)\ tisv%vi 'rvimc iT,pact ..%ntt v is Report lOr:r rc�unkl,thc3�st ut QUCC11 KIahwrlatlu l li�±hc,� v arld I' lual lai Road (North) is im:onsistent with tho traffic Uc�r. th+ r. lntt;rsection that 1-AL,�s w1imm,, but rcmam Linsignalized presen-, lza.ffic salrty l'aabiltt� rano ms for the govemmom. h- recommendation by SSFM Traffic frr: u: Anaiv:giq Rcport rvr mnnitoring of tht inum9eition of (Xwcn Kaa}tumanu HiOw a,. imd Kua kini I li;;h AaN i, 'Madt,-go4k:. Wht:rc. as hero, mi inWrscotiort passes mme th.M OFIC warrant 11100T ili voaditions. it sWuld bw pdoi tizcd or %im1% and dcsip ol'u stgiu� ror imolkilion, This circum.mrice will he exaeerlxoed b► 144, prc;'p owd proJect. 7 In surer thr l)rati IanvirollmeaLl 1swssmelit dnd SSFrvi "II run! tItt p4t;t Aoal�!iiti € uport dues uu[ presunt sufficient. credible tact:.md argil}s1s such that [lie adverse e irfxwli an existing 3r Wastroclure and resulting Crom imrew+:d traffic 4art h- fully undcrstmil. and reg tdi in appropmal �?mo,'rtlmew plaiuling ajul rrspon,,,e. 1 de i4rc: under irenalry of periury th.-it the t«re.pNt� is trLI . Datcd: Kailuu-Kc}i" iluwai•L ,r ; '/Xc;,P- 4 I'j-1 i, Lei flame: 01 Stantec September 13, 2021 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tel: (SOB) 494-2039 Mr. John Powell Via email: mar�p504att.net RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FDNSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kano District, HawaN Island Thank you for the comment letter dated October 4, 2020; an the draft Enviranrnentol Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: 1 am specificallyconcerned about the history and the undiscovered artitacrts that could be last. Very likely that more hcanc: r-_xcavatian is needed an the complete site. Only five acres was barely scrotchecl _~;n light heard exccavatior which uncovered many things. Response �: As described in Section 3.6 and in Appendix 5 (Archaeological Inventory .survey [A15] Reports) of the EA, the entire project site has been recently inventoried for archaeological resources. One inventory covered 76.'I acres and the other covered 5 acres. Section 3.6 [ncludes o summary discussion of the findings for bath surveys that cover the entire site, as well as a discussion of ho potential impacts would be minimized. The reports hove been submitted to SHPD for review and acceptance. Comment 2:1 orn aware that substanfial evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject parcels includes features of the Holualoo Slide, including rock walls that are inadeq+uotely described as agricultural walls in the archaeological studies offered in support of the DEA. The Holualoo Slide is an important Hawaiian cultural and archaeologicol feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if domccged or destroyed. Response 2: As described in Section 3.6 and included in Appendix 5 of the EA, two A15s were prepared for the project. As part of the AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evaluated for their significance. The AlSs were conducted following Hawaii Administrative Rules §13-276 and were evaluated cccording to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sites were considered signiticant under criterion d because of the information that was learned during the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs ensures that their information is not last. The documentotion done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. September 13, 2021 Mr, John Powell Page. 2 of 7 Regarding the rock walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 24211 } documented. This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of a he-lua. Also, the wails were 1.0 meter in height and is similar in constructed to similar historic arca rock walls constructed along historic -era reads, property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of a Land Commission Award (LCAj #3660. Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the some gulch" It is unlikely that this is a h5lua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a hvlua in the project site. Comment 3: l base my concerns upon the evaluation performed by Tom Pohaku Stone, a copy of which is attached. The DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and ancllysis such that the important Hawail an cultural and archaeological features can be understood let alone properly preserved. The DEA must be revised to address the location. data recovery and preservation of the Holualoa Slide components present an the subject parcels. R@s nse : In the email provided, there is reference to "the portion of the holua at the Holua inn (that) has rack walls on both sides" and refers to parallel walls within the proposed development area, possibly Site 31182 Feature 2 and Feature 3 walls which are LCA #3660 boundary walls. Primarily, qtr. Stone's email responses provide accurate information cancemirrg the cultural importance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the near -coastal region between Krailua to the north and Keauhou to the south. The remains of many of these complexes were first mapped by Henry Kekahuna. Mr. Stone correctly states the religious and social importance of he`eholua and its connection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures along the coast and in the near coastal region. However, the complexes are located more than 1.0 km west of the project area and td,ere are no remains of royal, sacred or sociopolitical complexes, or a hbluo, within the project area. The existence of a h6lua within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Stone. As discussed above, there is no documented oral history, archival documentation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a h6lua course existed within the project area. Comment 4: 1 am specifically concerned about drainagelrunoff, water quality, groundwater recharge, and flooding. There is no drainage plan that I could find. Projects need to have this plan first not after, These monster buildings appear to hove major runoff that can add to the problem. Response 4: Section 1.2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the Iwo Cou"My-o ned parcels_ The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify that on TMK (3) 7-621:19, "Infrastructure during Phase ll of the Proposed Project includes installation of a culvert system along with utilities and September 13, 2021 Mr, John Powell Page. 3 of 7 roadway across the ditch to extend Kekuana'aa Street, which would then be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the Kona Community Development Plan's (CDP's) "Official Transportation Map," For TNAK (3) 7-6-21:13, the project includes infrastructure for channelizing a portion of this <-i;Ich and includes a road and utility system crossings this ditch to provide the c_07- sector road required by Ordinance and the CDP's "Official Transportation map." Figure 2 has been revised ire the Final EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages: in the project Area. Additionally, the text in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that Kona Three would prepare a Drainage Plan to ensure that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage Pian which would be reviewed and approved by Department of Public Works, o_mment _5;. The steep topography, historical rapid storrnwater run-off and assCci❑ted dcrrage present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the Draft Environmental Assessment. I om aware that this project will have serious impact on the immediate rand surrounding area. Response 5: Klo�-.c 11hree LLC is not aware of any damage to adjoining properties, including Queen Ka'ahumcanu Highwoy, from water flowing from the subject ru -o perty. Comment & 1 am aware that flooding has occurred mckai of the highway. Response 6: Flooding has occurred mckai of Queen Ka'cahumc:nu Highway from waters in the County -awned Holualoa pitch and the Hcrseshoe Bend Ditch; however, as described in Section 3.3.2 of the EAr the proposed project would not be increasing the amount of water carried by these ditches from the entire drainage basin extending miles up -hill (above the proposed project). Comment 7; The DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood. A proper environmental assessment cannot leave meaningful details to be token core of in the future. As I understand it, such circumstances would lead to unlawful project segmentation among other errors. Response 7:. See response to comment 4. Also, text has been added in Section 3.3.2 of the Final EA to identify possible options for addressing the issues from existing flooding. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Comment 8: A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting autho ity that needed infrastructure will comply with government regulation, is insufficient. At a minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment roust be revised T:_) 1i }w specillccaliy what infrastructure September 13, 2021 Mr, John Powell Pt se. 4 of 7 improvements are required to tie into the County's drainage system and how those improvements will function. Response 8: The potential Impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design of the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at a later date, the potential Impacts from their construction are analyzed. Comment 9:1 have reviewed the pending Graft Environmental Assessment including i1he Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). i am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 9: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 10: In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuancaot^a Place. Kekuanao a Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and Is narrow with no curbs, guttem or sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on Impacts along Queen Kaahur-manu Highway. I amn particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Royal Vistas road system should follow County standards of Mauka to Makai with a signalized intersection cit the highway. Response 10: A� oesc-ribed in Section 1.2 of the EA, Kona Three LLC would extend County -corned Kekuano'oo Place and construct o new intersection Royal Vistas Road�vcay of the project's intersection with Queen Kauhumanu. The TIAR (Appendix 2', did not identify a signal warrant for the new intersection based on current and projected levels of growth_ To ensure safety, Keko ana'on Place and the new intersection would be built to County and State standards, and dedicated to I -e County. The Kekuana'oa Place extension constructed cs part of this project would include sidewalks and curved gutters. To clarify when the Kekuona'o a Place connection would occur, Figure 2 has been revised to show that access to the project site would be connected to Kekuanc:'ota Place from Lakes Street during Phase Il of the project. Therefore, at project completion, there would be two ways to access the project and would alleviate impacts to any one entrance. Comment Ill: This DEA reciires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the IAEA ignores them. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana'oa Place with young children present. Response 11: Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not September 13, 2021 Mr, John Powell Page. 5 of 7 expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (in Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 12: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, 'The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; stormwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. Thls bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Mules. Response 12: The EA describes potentiol impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary staternent quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above In the body of the EA. Comment 13: The Planning Deportment should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TZAR, which €ails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 1�: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably step controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 14: The TIAR uses a growth rote of 1%, in contrast to the 2 growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAL. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response 14: Hawaii Depadment of Transportation IHDQT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Lange Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 20735 were used to come up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used I% from the 2025 LRTP forecast. Comment 15: The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to censr,s data and likely underestimates daily vehicle tripfi atfnbLitable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 15: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus.. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and mid -rise was considered. Lava -rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very law standard deviation and an R - squared value very close to 1.070. so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. September 13, 2021 Mr, John Powell Pac ge, 6 of 7 Cn.mrnert .16: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu highway can the selected dates of April 30. 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Soturday, compared with the 2018 VVItcher Engineering Traffic In-ipcact Analysis Repo 11, which reported 1057 57 vehicles for januc ry 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volime of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 20T6 for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volurne is more than double the maximum 10% variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. Response lb: The most recent Historic HDOT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kaahumonu Highway section between Nor -ii Kailuo Road and Hualalcai Road (north)_ Cour traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 H'DOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. it is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HD07 Count, Comment 20: The recommendation by the TIAL for a roundabout at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and iHualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concems for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersectlon of Queen Kasahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. There, as here, an intersection passes more thcn one worrcnt under cll conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Reponse 20: The Manual an Uniform Traffic Control Crevices (MUTCD) states, "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of ca traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increcse in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and ethers, The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should ❑Iso be noted that rr-K:iny of these intersections Currently warrant ❑ signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant, We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional ,comments or questions about the EA. please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, 5tantec Consulting Services Inc, September 13, 2021 Mr, John Powell Page. 7 of 7 Michele Lefebvre; Ph.D. michele_lefebwe:a}stanfec.com CC. Richard Wheelock, Kana Three LLC Maija lcacksor, County of Hain d'i Planning Department Mori, Ashley Frpm: Joel Girnpel-:atohafidlr6hacI corn'> Seat: Wednesday, ail taper 07, 2020 7:54 AM 7o: Planning Internet Wil Subject: Royal Vistas Housing Project (TMK Nns. (3) 7.6.021:016, 7-6-021:017, 7.6-021 018, and 7-6-021.019) DEA com rnent5 Dear Director Yee: I humbly apologize for misspelling your name on the comments regarding fhe subject DEA that 1 suhmilted late yesterday. Sincerely, Joel G impel Mori, A shte From ,Rrzl .irT'PPJ • aInrlirfi.-I EWI camp iik. tohm Cb 2020 5 P. FSM To, PLIF-11ing Ir t?r7 t Mail Subject Re_-y,I Vistas �-ou incl Project (TMK Nos. (3) 7-5-02'1016, 7.6-021:017, 7-6.021:{]18, and 1--( 1?? LILA _ornments Dear Director Lee, . You may recall the comments I submitted on August 13 stating my many concerns over the shortcomings of the Traffic Impact Analysis in the subject DEA. and commenting on the problem of already overcrowded public sohools serving the area that was not adequately addressed. I hereby express my thans and appreciation for your decision to extend the deadline for comments because of the delayed notification, Accordingly, I had the opportunity to more carefully review the DEA and prepare the fallowing cornments and concerns regarding the archeological and cultural issues raised. Because I lige in and own a home in Pualani Estates, the 362 -single family home sulbdivision several hundred yards north of the subject property, tlic; pendin& DFA -i 1'f ctS III and my family's personal nd propt�rty interests. I am specifically ct�nccmcd show The iai,idequaey (-IF1.11 arc}tic:{61-iUal tt,cliax III] Ipk11,61 ,, 10 wAlpport the EDEA becaosc ilirre evi&nce that tl e subje t mcludu.-, I ` i!l[rt ol' tltc HOILINIOa Slitte, including rock WAN, 111:11. Arc indlICquatcly described ,as a riculwral %� Lills "I lie I kilualt)a 'Aide is art ionpoii int l- av,:tii;rl1 caltw-al and Ie3t►1re l`roiii p:,�,-1, cslcrrn oonldtc;t times that cannot be replaced 1t'damaged dor destroyed. In short, the DPA doe; n t i oritain fact~ wid an ilywiN stifIlic'icn] to uijidorsland and pros rvu the Unportant llawau`ian cUR11ral and archaeological features. Mahaalo for your careful cons Acration of tliese, additional concerns. Joel Gimpel 75-628 N, M- ea Unakila Pl. Kailua-Kiana, HI 96740 9081322-5-4991 1 September 1.3, 2021 S,tantec ConsutFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Mr. Joel Gimpel 75.628 N. Mea Lanokila Pl. Kailua-Kona, HI 96746 Vita email: alohafidlrsoaal.cnrYr RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawaii Island Dear Mr_ impel: Thai7k y. -)u for the comment letter dated October 6, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. 0-0mmont 1: 1 am specifically corcerned about the inadequacy of the archeological studies purporting to support the DEA because there is substantial evidence that the subject includes features of the Holualoa Slide, including rack walls, that are inadequately described as agr'icuitural vvalhs. The Holualoa Slide is an important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if damaged or destroyed, In short, the DEA doesn't contain fact's and analysis sufficient to understand and preserve the important Hrawai'ian cultural and archaeclogiccl features. Response 1: Regarding the nock walls within, the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 24211 j documented. This road is not very straight. has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth:. as would be expected it the site were the remains of a h6lua. Also, the wails were 1.0 meter in height and is similar in constructed to slmllar historic era rock walls constructed along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens. and cattle pastures. The only ether parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Creatures 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls dre located clang the boundary of a Land Commission Award (LCA) #3660. Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is o gap in the feature 2 wall at the some gulch. It is unlikely that this is a hNua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Thereforer there is no evidence of a holia in the project site. September 13, 2021 Mr. Joel Gimpel Page. 2 of 2 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by ernall. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. dJt ,Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona, Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawai"i Planning Department Mari, Ashley From: Bruce Kirschenbaum {brutelc� 55 rtt i9,cr rrn Sell Tuesday, October CG, 2020 10:28 AM Ta: Rlarining Internet Mail Subject: RopaI Vistas Housing Project EA cornrnents Attachments: Kirschernba€ m Declaration re Traffic IOC120.docx; K rschenbaum DeOarat ars re archeabgical feature 1001202+ .docx To whom 9t may conctTn: rlttaCIiin t tlz1 ertt it are two clet-larations n)neerning the Roval '� sta±, Develnp»eni C)r'.ttt Hn ironirterilal Assessment submission. i V4oulcl :ipprcci.ite an email indicating rcccipt (if th same lbr my ruuvrds. Thank you A)r v#►ur ��4tasi erati��rt, Bruce KiFSLhcnh gum Y,0-404-99 Kona Vistas Resident .:16589 I)I:(: L.,ARATION OF BRUCE KIRSCHENBALINI 1. BRUCE K1RSC'IlF:NBAtaM, declare: I ekiri a rc-sikknt of -the Kcxta Vlstil5 subdit•isiou, Vsturdy of Hawaii. State of Hwhai`i. [lie proNsed land do clopirvnl projeo that is the subyecl sof the pLndirig Draft Environmental Assessmeat suhrnttted by Royal Vistas I lousing FirOjert Tts� N1 1dp Kcy Nim, (3) 7-6-02 1:016. 7-6-01.1;017. 7-6- 021.101,x. and 7-6-021-}l9 forth Ktina District, }lawai'i Ishnid, Statu of Htk►nai'i affo t, me aN ', ell w, af" ,ctsmy int stin real Property. 1 reside within taro blocks of the propoNed land dove[opment prctjcct and live on lr uhttilrtava Place, one oftwo main rousts to i(nyal Vistas. In such capacities.. I have firsthand kno %, I W ge uf'th4 follu%virkg ftwis and evuld id wouI41 1L--ai1 Y tIivTettp if calIciI upon tr) do w, ? i hu—,%; L.hL I),-ndIng DRAFT I-NVIRC]t4JMEN I'Al- .AS` ESSMFN'C includingthe rl r stt c: Inrl�,iti:E ; ,� rly is ItsJlscrrt hyf SSF 1" lir'.�,r .j�'� �e�,�1. rl•��ccl Ic�l . 2ri}f-f all 1 attached as Appendix? to the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. I am %pccifically concerned about a&erse traffic impacts both within and witlxsut the. Kona Vistas Subdivision ttwi are not fully crr accurately addressed in the SSFIM Traffic Impaet analysis RzTurt. Trafflc and the SS FM Traffic Itupact Analysis Report. arm discussed its the body of the DRAFT F.NVIRC1Nh' ENTAL .ASSESSMENT. at pp. 48-50. 67 and 71. Today. the nurnhercif trips that passLNdirevtly in froth of nay hvuse on Kukuanaoa Plate is less than thirty per day. Kukuanaoa Place is a quiet residential strut that "T's" Into Lzko Street. I'er rite roads and tratlir plan i'or Royal Vistas, h trkarctriMNI Plaice would he used as one of the Mo tTidrJtlr Irl�;l°4ss'cgre{S f7l[it, to scrvice miffie for the 450-urtit subdivision. Not bein- a trade expert, but assuming k<wa t oC the 45+) units owns 1.5 cars and each of thosie cars. rnarkes two trips inr'out of the dev'elqrw` i :nor day and those [tips equally use the main highwny attd Kukuanaoa PIRCC aS thC17 ihoruuv�hfares iar the mps- that would I lac:rrewse the traffic on Kukuanatua Place fr ITI 30 to (17� trtp�' pee - d IV. 1 -hat's a ?.ltQ()°'n iittirc sc, 1-1ov, would you like to have the strcel .you Iive on turt)ca into a rnajer roadway when id 1%a s never Into ndcd or designcd for such a purpose. Why shoukl tfiv residcrit;s of Kukkrarnaoa Street and Kona Vistus boar the brunt of Cstahlislting UstiCrin111y a Molution to Rikyal Vistas traMf rvquironicnt"? That simply is not i-inr and wrong in my view. If YOU exaMIFIC I .sintilar developmont that is clic next group v1'paarcels directly to the forth of Royal Vistus. Puulant L-s(atcs. Puspuaanw Street is the main anti reale itigressiegrm point for I of their traffic flow, 'FhQre 4v: vo cross ru;W!, that lrnve been used to 41 iy tr°affiw to another area in eider sen -ice their drvelopment I helicvc the: swine colwcpt should be used for Royal Vistas Willi all trrtr5%; routed thi-ough tltc new coruiectiun io the main Quem K highway. In the Komi L'!�, ti01 . I h:Itilrk'li;s on the use of substandard roadway, Kel uana`na lklact. Kckuaoa`uat Place is vtry steep' lvaw Iintlited sight distances due to extreme cE1ni� Lind is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact ofinc:rcawcd traffw wising from Ph -se I and Phzsc 2 huildouts ofthe Royal Vistas Housing Project is inadequately uddressed in the SSF'M Traffic Impact Analvsis Report, which focu-,c4 instead on impacts alcing Queen Kaahumanu Highw y. I art) panictitlarl%, tt>ncorned rha)t adding numerous vchiclQ trips to and from a s€-laa rate subdivision will present dingtrs and congestion to regi(ients along Kekt)atnwaa Place_ 1 consider that the Planning DcErartr eni should require the.applccartt tP address these cencerng. 4. The DRAFT CNVIRONMENT.AI. ASSESSMENT ro:ittirQN e,,uluation of. among others, adverse sec'ancian, Impacts. such as prilyaluliGn Chli tges est- t#f Cm O1i'mebfic Ociliries. , cLLe Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Instead of squarely addressing rhes issues, however, r, the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSM!HN'T simply i&m(wrew them. eluirning that "No ad-6�orse see,tidary cffectw are expected sincv the dc, elopment would ull11te existing infrat.structtdm provide infill housing, and is net exFMA- tel ttr K-SUH i11 NUI-►;talili it di;rttaiuls 1+ Coetnty scrrriceti." It is a sc,- ouw omission for tine DRAFT' I;:NN,]Ito NMI -\TAI ASSESSMENT to 1tiil tty addrm the patentisl ricivcr%c impacts 4if in6;rc u,;iirtg tliL! use twi' substandard e.xiaitin- irtfra*,trueture. like K kraana`oa Place. 5. `rhe DRA11-1 I"NV1lWNMV.N"rA1. ASSESS N1ENT aWdresws adverse traffic impiiets milt' in Ilia euiur x: cat whether the project would litive a mrhsrcarrnal eeell-erse e1jeef on public- hoalth. `Me AppliCant claitrts. "rile Propow-d Project Would 1101 at(Cut pUbtli; 11CA11II iti any tvtiy, siormwvator would is appropriately disposed of in dridnagc structures. Trifik. impacts have . ..taI[eto aO}r i it r :ki I i ip I1I.J.VIr.tr :ii._ir t�;�; `: sie_s,�ri "' Frnphasis added. This bald e:nttclusiratt (99)C -s rrr�r Add C, ti I).0 i1!irr,I0,, J" rLr1.1ir -d by Chapter 1 1-200-1-13, Hrrwaii Administrati%�e Rules. 6. The Planning D�epartrnent should not accept the DRAFTENVIRONMENTAL AL ASSESSME?�,'T's Tckain=on the SSFM'rraffic Impact Analysis Report w hich has Ih+e followw'ing deficiencies; a. failure to address adverse traffic imp:i is within the Kona ViS[a.� suhdiw-iz-ivn arising, front Ober prujtM, 3 K TIv SSFM Traffic impact Analysis Report uses a growth rate of I %, in cuntrast to the 21!-� grmwth rate employed by the: 2019 WitvhuT Enoivcvn'ng Traffic lnapact .Analysis Report. Traffic cungestien is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-hilear, exponential relation, C_ The SSFM Traftie Impact Ail iali,,Is, Regi duos nol recognize muIII-,gt•neratiuiial houshiv �Jh�trac•turlsILLs ecrnmon in Hawaii according, to census data and likely undcrestimaws dal I�, v,,; hitilu trips aitrihutub Ic w buiWout 0rthe proptased pro]'ea_n: d. The SSFV Traffic Impae:t Analysis Refxtrl employs Litt unusually low- vcltivlc VL -L,U:Iii lICS -53 4 hICIrs li0, Not-th1.hoond (ween Knahuinanu highway an the scicetcd clog:, of, Aprt1 30, '_II �''. _r �kuo€ I� i, r stir;I AUP, WS1 24. '01'), 1 Satr.rrtl.i., cuIII pared tiwltla alta 2(1I � W I"I�:l Eta ,lrlccllIl_4 TI°.still' Il:,p,ct AiialN s19 TZcp it. %k jii, II rr I�i1!fiti+i 1 ",Itis tc`hicIcs I�lr _1ilr .i.l! , 14 :II 15, ?(tlh. N)ih weekda s- The urau:arrdIly lcaW reported L'I11,IC 40ItI C LIi'R53 is 31%) at LICicts with E figure 4 of the SS 1. M -T'raffic Impact Analysis Report.. which shows apprtlximutcly IOSO vctivIt:s PCF hese[ iaa 016 fOF Northbowid Queen KanIM!iaanxl Highway at T a.m. Me difference in volurrac is !rai7rt; than duullk the naaxirtautrr 10% varidtiaFta gent:rally aa4tcpWd to duty-tar-duy ni a;ure>aaents {`find thus unreliable; C. The icctaai nw-nclation by SSFM Trafftu �npacl Analysib Report fora roundabout at Qu+cen Kaahuananau l-ligbwaw and I:lualalai Road (North) is incow;istcnt %a« th the traffic corridor. LnLmeri: logs that plass %varrants but remain unsignalizecl present traffic suety hability concerns for the govemlalcrat; C The recornrnenclaficin by SSFMt Traffic: Impact Analysis Report for monito inn of the intersection of Queen K aahumanu I I iw hw ay and Kuakini Highway is inadequate- %Yhirc, as here, an intersec:tiort passes more than urge +w arralal under all corxlitions, it should be prioritized 4 for study and design of a signal for installation. Tins circumstance will be exaq�.erhaioi I)y t;:IV i, In sum. the Dtali Environmental Assessment and SSFIM Traffic Impact .Analysis Repurt duty nut present sulIicitnt_ crtxiiblG facts €inti w-talysis such that the adverse impricts on existing inFrastructurc anr, awl g frani incrcascd traffic clan he fully undcrslood and result ire appropriate government lalann1ng, and response. 8, 1 WiNh to add a .'a'aWrncni expl-C."' Ting my c:oncvnis l -sr satcty arra tilt: prtrfw )-.'Cd madw•a} through Kona Vistas as well. pis !hc street does not have sldew atks n n I y Biles separating the Mai rt rc ad fill ILI the sid-;+cards, alit- pet) 1)1e %v ho Nvalk, children wv io pl4v. bike riders. skaichow is iI rrdcrs 1[ave Iill lc L;tliiL' nl r' +1' 11cir• stiloty (hic to [lie -,ury liwr resrdertttril neigthorhood traffic that cxr,,;ts today. Oncc Itiekua:7anw i Place is opened to Royal Vistas and itS ahriost a tYrctusurid trips per d v. it would be extreme ly tai ai v to t.njoy thu autivit es I just dusciihed e -specially with tht. fait the street is hilly and there. <ire not unobstructed views of oncomutg traffic or pedestrians. Plain could lead to a very dangmus situatiou in €r rgsiL ClILiul neig iborhInid. I declare under petyaltV of perjury that the toregcring is true.. Dated. Ksilua-Ktina, H€ �tiai`i, Wober 1. 2029. Signature: 6 1 WX Printed name: Brace Kirschenhaurn 764314 Kulwuanaoa Place Ktxilua-Kona, 1•11 ()6740 L�e-uce.k��� {�� ray �rr�Lril.c�irn 360-904-9563 R September 13, 2021 Stantec ConsutFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tel: t$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Bruce Kirschenbaum Via email: brucek4555Cgmail.com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns In the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FCNSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kana District;, Hawai"i Island Dear Mr. Kirschenbaum: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 6. 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment JDEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kong Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response f: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 2: Today, the number of trips that passes directly in front of my house on Kukuanaoa Place is less than thirty per day. Kukuanaoa Place is a quiet residential street that 'T's" into Lako Street. Per the roads and traffic plan for Royal Vistas, Kukuanaoa Place would be used as one of the two major ingress/egress points to service traffic for the 450-unif subdivision. Not being a traffic expert, but assuming each of the 450 'units awns 1.5 cars and each of those cars makes two trips inlout of the development per day and those trips equally use the main :highway and Kukucincloo Place as their thoroughfares for the trips, that would increase the traffic an Kukuanaoa PiQce from 30 to 675 trips per day. That's a 2.000% increase. Response 2: Regarding the methods for calculating trips, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Handbook referenced in the TIAR (Appendix 2 in the EA) used for the traffic anc7lysis uses housing units, and it does not assure one person per unit. This is taken from the ITE trip gen handbook regarding land use 220: 2.72 residents are assumed for each, unit. There is no trip generation for number of bedroorns. It is difficult to analyze and make projections based on number of bedrooms. or how many people we expect in bedrooms. The ITE trip generation for land use 220 collected data on low-rise multifamily housing, and based on that data, the traffic model came up with a best fitted curve, which discussed below, has a very low standard deviation, and a very high R squared value, which indicated that the data collected is not scattered, The TIAR assumes a land use that is typical, and with the best possible data, captures the number of project generated trips. Q� September 13, 2+021 Mr. Bruce Kirschenbaum Flooe. 2 of w Comment -3. If you examine a similar development that is the next group of parcels directly to the North of Royal Vistas, Pualani Estates, Puapuaanui Street is the main and sole ingress/egress paint for 100% of their traffic flow, There are no crass roads that have been used to offloy traffic to another area in order service their development. I believe the same concept should be used for Royal Vistas with all traffic routed through the new connection to the main Queen K highway. Response 3: As described in Section 3.7.2 of the EA, Kona Three LLC «reposes to construct a new iniersection Royal Vistas Roadway at the project's intersection with Queen Kcaahumanu. As required by the County, and in accordance with Kona Community Development Plan (CDP), the major roads in Royal Vistas would be build and dedicated to the County. The County has long-range plans as outlined in the CDP Official Transportation Map tar these dedicated roads to link Kana Vistas roads Leilarli Street and Kekuona'oa Place to Punlani Estates' roads ho`omama Street and Paulehia Street respectively as part of their community connecfivity policy. These reads are also planned to further extend to the north eventually. Additionally, Figure 2 has been revised to show that access to the project site would be connected to K.ekuana'o4a Place from Lako Street during Phase II of the project. At project completion, there would be two ways to access the project and according to the traffic analysis would serve the needs of the project without exacerbating regional traffic. Comment d: In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekuonaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahumanu Highwvcy. I cern particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present hangers wnd congestion to residents along Kekuanaoo Place. l consider that the Planning Departruenr should require the appfcant to address these concerns. Response 4: Kekuana'ca Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the scar�)e specificafIOFr s as oil other Kona Vistas reads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic irnpact on Kekuana'oa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of KekuanoLoo Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, Cance full guild -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 addifional vehicles on Kekuana'oa Place during the AM Perak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana`aa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Q� September 13, 2+021 Mr. Rruce Kirschenbaum Floo.3ofw .Comment $: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. 5: Secondary effects are in ^t r w - affects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7,1 of the EA. Regrading potential traffic impacts to Kekuana`oci Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'€aa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 orad 9, for the AM and PM peak hours, respecfivel�. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment k: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, 'The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; stormwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design " Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 1 1,200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules, Response 6: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and Reasons. and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment 7: The Plarining Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kenna Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 7: Intersections within the Kama Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably strap controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant.. Comment 8: The fIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation, Response : Howaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts slid not slow an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lang Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 27o, our traffic engineers used 1 % from the 2025 LRTP forecast, Q� September 13, 2+021 Mr. Rruce Kirschenbaum Floo.4ofw Comment 9; The TZAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics con--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 4: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and raid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided ca higher volurne output. This land use has a very low Aondard deviaticr, and on R - squared value very close to 1,00, so statistically this is the best }projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 10: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Koahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2€ 14, a Saturday, scampered with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repol 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with f=igure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Koahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more Masan double the maximum 10% variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. Response 10: The most recent Historic HDOT count available in the study area Twos the 2016 Oueen Kcahumanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Road and Hualalai Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDGT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hared to say if the 'Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounfing, but the TIAR for the project sloes use numbers similar to these provided in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 11: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Koahunn anu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants 'best remain ursignclized present froffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Irrca❑huruonu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response 11; The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states, "The scsfisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are Bather considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and ethers. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where Q� September 13, 2+021 Mr. Rruce Kirschenbaum Page. S of 5 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Comment 72; 1 am concerned about safety on the proposed roadway through Kana Vistas as well. As the street does not have sidewalks only lines sepOrating the main road from the sidebocrds, the people who walk, children who play, bike riders, skateboard riders have little concern for their safety due to the very low residential neighborhood traffic that exists today. Once Kekuanaoa Place is opened to Royal Vistas and its almost a thousand trips per dray, it would be extremely unsafe to enjoy the activities I just described especiolly with the fact the street is hilly and there are not unobstructed views of oncoming traffic or pedestrians. This could lead to a very dangerous situation in a residenlial neighborhood. Response 12, As described in Section 1 .2 of the EA, Krona Three LLC would extend County -owned Kekuana`oo Place and construct a new intersection Royal Vistas Roadway cit the project's intersection with Queen Kciahumariu. These reads would be buil[ to County and State standards, and dedicated to the County. The Kekuana'oa Place extension constructed os part of this project would include sidewalks and curved gutters. To clarify when the Kekucano'oa Place connection would occur, Figure 2 in the EA has been revised to shove that access to the project site would be connected to Kekuana'aa Place from Laka Street during Phase II of the project. Therefore, at project completion, there would be two ways to access the project and would alleviate impacts to any one entrance. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. It you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely,. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvregsta ntec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC ,Mlaija Jackson, County of Hawcai'i Planning Deportment Mori, Ashl IFrom: Bonnie Miki rkinausUVgmail corn> Sent: Tuesday, October 06. 2020 5 35 P To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: diamkonaCtOW corn, Joan & Mark Powell Subject: Royal nista Housing Project EA comments A-Hachments: imgOOS.pdi; ATTC}DOOl,htrrt; imgW6.pdf ATT00002.htrn; irng007.pdf; ATTQi.M3.htm, img008.pdf- ATTG0004,htm, imyf34)9.pdf; AT IF000 IS htm "GOS DEC 1.:1KATION 01- JOHN CGMALD 14111 1 1 l am a resident of 76-1344 KInaa Street � Kunst Vistas subdivision J. County of Hmkai'i. Mate oflla�vai'i The proposed land developmem project that is- Thi subjccr of die pending Draft svhtrtirre d by Ro!!al Vism lino i i I'raject -fax Map Kev 14ttw (;) 7-6-021 0116, 7-6421 Q17, 7-6-0-11 U IN, ant 7-0-021 011? North Karin District, Hawai"i Island. Staty of FIawat' i alms me personally as well as atTccts my irkicrest in real pro peny l residawithir !Ct(i Yarrd-, of the proposed late! dex,eIopmertt project. In Stich C PACI13eg, 1 have firsTll;knd knowledge of the r'0llow ing 1'ac:ts and could and would testify therem If called upon to do io �. l have reg cwed the Sending DRAI-°'T 1=NV[R0NN1E \ I`Al. ASSF.SSVIL:NI` including the TFRITc Impact ,krtal.vsis Report by SSFNI Inuxnatic_ntai_ dated July 2020 and nttacltecl as appendix 2 to the DRAFT EN%'IKD%,%,IE NT.A1. ASSESSNTENT. lam gpec:ikally ccm ertted about adverse traffic impacts bDth widwl and �v toot Kona Vistas subdivision that are net fully or accurately addre- etj rn the SSFM 'Ti af7;!c h-rtpac-t.Artalvs9s Report. Traffic and the SSF I Ttaflic, Iinpact Anal c,%iw Fi port are &scussed in the Dodi of the 1.PLA FT EN.-'IRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT at pt7 48-36, fir? Hail 71 At 9'2 }fears cold. I spent summers dare ng 11'WU %vale Other klj:>' alav:ng in front of my C'hine,mg,wandparews grocer, stares in Horallt> L on Nfatmalattm Hi hwaw, the only level area hemeen the pahaehoe and a'a lava roadside Cnlv an .wcasicmal sampan taxi carrying tourists T- ! 0 from I -lila to the Kona Inn or l)r I i1% a, ai makin', hAISo calm +n his \'1.1:M T iii:emrltc 1 (),.r I►I..'V Noxk, 7i Fears later, our South Dona ahana relaaon7 cvniplain that cnrilc.„ m tic m,akc�s i1 hard to enter the mit-lane reg l Its go To t1ti`i -or oT tK rnT-'(1s.`M`r�' S1Ctfe After retirinu to ourKmicihana I, r~ c oflL'Lakch SLrOet in )990, my wife. alid [ uatcllerl the traffic turn roto uT1d1ock where KLiakirti role rsvi-IS Queen Ka'ahLimantl l-li11TW-R%- Ai e` Is ow KoTta Three LLC wants to hurl,: a 45!) Omit giAi-vision whtch %Fill add ')A) DILLS cars intra the r%-cj,-ianc r,&cle crawl stretching from ['attain (:r+A to Palani Road Using ate ouidated 1993 SIS, Kona'lhrec rcc)uest aceos thr4 ugh narrow reildential aIrVel'.:rt Kohn vistas anti pualatll I slates Issues not adequately addressed Incltt& traffic stray and density, emeruency vehicle access. kids disernbarkingfrom school busses. theIac•k of curbs anti S11dev,aIks r;rlraireA Icy a lc iTr. lialieni tlrivors cuITing IhTVLip h Pualani hstare s, Konit Nims, nji [ �wl"L![ st.h&v ", 1., t 1" Imss grrtihwk, Ant] M l'ging Inauka and makai traffic from Lako Siwvi onto QuooiL Ka ._ .=anu Hi►thtiw•uv In ad6ticm, the OTigirtal t emeat for Sunset Subdi4islon's Leiiani S., va.sorrIN 40 No,, wide To ptIuvide sae accost for modern cmeugeney mnbu :ir,- .+j._I ! r I :.r , rk4e;s I'— undetgr`ound utilities, cable artJ electric lines, etc., the easement for Leilarii S-reet was widened to 60 feet when Kona Vi5tas porti pit +.gas built It is hazardous if emergeency vehicle;, enCOLInterin.g traffic accident gndlock on Queen Ka`abann nu I -L A%vay ior Leko Svr et, are rorc-ed to e-nwT the prnpo,.-i d Royal NimLs subdi%,�s!ori rhr(%ti-Yh Sunset`s narrmA porimn of Leilam Street tc: flUell a fire andlcr save llvei We're not against development ldut the I)Mple of Wiest I latah rtcr:d Liffoidable I•oumng wtth reasonable access to and from work, rather than ariother developer building more n -61110n. ;;� 1,5- rgz,�' dDIIar homes fer wealthy siiowbird& we need a tiyider hi�lttvay, nor P00 more cars, trEtc k s and vaats choking our tvve-1,uie Queen Ka'ahumanu 11(igl-waN while we sit in gridlock. a. In flicK rnaVmas subdivisi-on, t:i.e PrgpUSUd prOjec-t relies On the use of a substandard roadway. Kekwna`ua Place Kelcuana'oa Place is very steep, has >litnired sight distances duc to extrcme curves and is nerrDv. wiih no sidewalks The unpact of [ti4rcn5cd trail is arismR FTurri Ph.? -w. 1 and Phase ? bLrllclt}t,ts Of the Reval 4Irstas HOUSing Pr0jeer is, inadequately addressed in the SSI N1 1'ratfic Impact Analysts Repan, which fociises rn�tead on impacts airing (ween KaAwwriu Highway I am paryicLrlarly ccriceMed that adding nunterous vehicle trips to and from a weparare subdivisiotirt vki I 1-esenr darigerk anis c'wigextitin to reNidents akar Keku nx•cra Flare. I considee the Plman; 1I Dcl°rrirlIII :rtt ;Iol1"t? csIIiiiv Ihc :1 ,, i 1}]ican I to address zhese concerns. 4 The DRAFT PNl.fl,A I. 4,SS1.SSMENT rc* uireS evaluation Of, arno:lu IIthets,U)V-L-r-Ae Ne! c.•rart4hjrI, rM114wll , S,rr•h rr,vprr{mr fjritin changes ori.jtecr.g --mpuMi� ?6cilinev ,�= C'haptt�r 1 1 -200 l -1 s. Raw ELI i A1dmi nish-able Rules Inslead of wtluatvy ac di-es.sing These issues. hotiA ever• ffie DRAFT EN IRONNIFLI;TALASSESSMENT sniT ply ignoms, therxt, c hoirnine that "No ridver5e secondary effects are ecpected sitiec the development 4k, nuld utili��• existiri infrasinictr:re, provide infill hooting. and is not expected to result in substantial demands to County seroces " It Is a serjous onii ss�Lin t;,r the DRAFT F--NVIRONMFNTAI_ ASSESSNIEN T to Tail to address the Puteridal advcrse impacts of increasing the use alf substandard extstirig infrastructurt:, like Kek-iana-oa Place_ 5 The DR -A -FT ENVIRON -MENTAL ASSESSMENT PLM-L-sses adverse tra#FFc irnpa:,ts Ginty in the conte is 4 wherher the Pir 'ect wouId I)wh rc.• 1ioaljh. -Re,Ap+plicartit clairns_ "The Proposed 1'rcajcwt wmild nar af`€eci public health in 8iny itDrmwazer WOUTA ht appropriaTe.1V disposed of in drainage strurctures Traffic imyaet5 hove t7m) 0reful cc, nsidc ion 1n Q[Q !E:!i des?ori. ' Fri p hosis odded, T nis Oaf corciusl ;n does not address potenld a0verse Impacts cis 'equlred O'y Chapter lI-240 1-13. klvvaiiAdministrativeRules 6. The Planning Deparrrneni: should rim accept the DKAF1" ENVIRC`lltiMENIAL ASS SS.:M N1%reIiance on flie SS11P M Iralfic Impact Analysis, R.cpcxi, uFhiclt haz the,1'AIowi,ng deficiencies a (7ilare to address advcrsc traffic impacts within he Konm Vistas sabdivisinn arisrrtst rrxi the project, l) The SS -FM TrafFtc Impact Analyilli RQpert use u .,gowth rate of 1 °'w. in commst to rhe '2`% growt1i we ertlpbr ed by the 2018 Witcber Engineering Traffic Impact Analvsis Report -1`s-a3iic CA)in a lion Is 'eery Sen&tive to gyrowth rate in.9 non-linear, exponential rdaticn, 6: The SSFM 'Ur ,.111c. Inipact Analysis Report Anes noT recrig nice rnLrhi-generariottal 11OU51118 charraeteNstles comi"nun iu 1 kv aii accorcling io censcas (Wil and likely underestimates daily Vehicle trips attri1>WUl`1I- t(-. kcailc AIL Of the larupowd protect, �i The SSF%l Traffic Impact Analysis Report employs an unusually log+ velticle volume of 8*3 vehildes for 1' wThbcrund Queen Kia.hurnanu highway on thselected d,11-5 of April 30, 21719, a weekda,. artd .August'4. 20111). a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering 1'ratFc Impact Analysis Report, which reported 1057 vehicles for January~ 14 road. I g, 2016, i adi wei°l.r iys The Lsnusually log v repuried wehlck volunic o 853 is aFsn A udd4 rich Figure 4 oFthe SSF%1 "Traffic Impact Analysis Report, which shows approximately 100 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbcun,d Queen Kaahurr:anu Hiphway at 7 a.m The difference in Wir,irne i5 Tr OR thtrn double the inaxitnum 10%-ariation �tenerally accepted rn dav-to-dav meaSUEPE-flews and thus 011reliahle, e Thv r-ecu!nmendation by SSFM FratTc ltnpaei Analysis Repor-1 for a roundabout at Queen 1•Caal'rr.tr-nalir, Highway Ind Hiwal dad Rv�lid (Ncsrih) is Inc onsisteut wills the fieffirc; c:Orridor Intersections Thai pass %varrants hur remmrn nnso3na.1t%.1 !iandlty concerns for the. govemment, C Tito recomt>te-ndgwon lay SSFM Traffic ImpactAnalysis Rep -ort for nionitaring of the ntersection 4 OuQcti Kaalruaianu Ni!,hwav and Kuakini Ilighway is inadequate Where, as he!V, air MWILSCi~ 011 pJsse5 11101t: Lhan orre warram undcr -]l condit ons, it should he phnfi'tired for sutdv and desigti cel' a signal for insultattun. This circumstance mill be exacernalctd 1,v the I'r"i)lIcrMexl lrrrtij*L%T Its suint, tlac Di'afi EnNimnnietttal, Assessaniint and _SSFM 'I°raFtic. ln�pact F"ci�Rl�vsis Re.pert does nol preserrl �affic-tent, c ii-edi1)1c °acts �4n(I anaIYgs siieh that the adv ersc impacts cm exiStiIla irtfrarstructurr« artd resulLing frow i traps cdr lie raIIY cinderstcicxt and result in appropmale goverm m planning and response 16l xla,-e tinder penalty rel: penury, That ft-fCCIMS01tig is true. C Dated Kailua-K Ana, Hawaii, 6 Ckiob-cr, 1-0201 Signaxure �' 4 Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec Consul&ng Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek {$QS) 494.2039 Mr. John Gerald Miki Via email: kinaus*ggmail.com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kana District, Hawal'i island Deoi Mr. Miki: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 6, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEAj for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments.. Comment 1: 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the T.rcffic. Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I am specifically cancer,ed about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subd vis.:)n that ;ire not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 2: At`c-:k,- retiring to our Komohana home off Lako Street in 1990, my wife and I watched the traffic turn into gridlock where Kuakini Highway intersects Queen Ka'ahumai-u Highway. Using ;an outdated 1983 EIS, Kona Three request access through narrow residential streets in Kana Vistas and Pualani Estates. Issues not adequately addressed include traffic safety and density, emergency vehicle access, kids disembarking from school busses. the lack of curbs and sidewalks required by code, Impatient drivers cutting through Pualani Estates, Kana Vistas, and Sunset subdivisions to bypass gridlock, and merging mauka and makai traffic from Lako Street onto Queen Ko'chumonu Highway. In addition, the original easement for Sunset Subdivision's Leilani Street was only 40 feet wide. II is hazardous if emergency vehicles, encountering traffic accident gridlock on Queen Ka'ahun-ianu Highway or Lako Street, are forced to enter the proposed Royal Vistas subdivision through Sunset's narrow portion of Leilani Street to quell a fire and/or nave lives. Response 2: Kona Three is not requesting r cress through Pualani Estates. As aescribed in Section 1.2 of the EA, Kana Three LLC would extend County -owned Kekuana'oo Place and construct a new intersection Royal Vistas Roadway at the project's intersection with Queen Kcahumanu. To ensure safety these roads would be built to County and State standards, and dedicated to the County. The Kekuana'oc Place extension constructed as part of this project would include sidewalks and curved gutters. To clarify when the Keit arc'ou Place September 13, 2021 Mr. John Gerald MW Page. 2 of 4 connection would occur, Figure 2 of the EA has been revised to show that access to the project site would be connected to Kekuana`aa Place from Eraka Street during Phase 11 of the project. There#ore, of project completion, there would be two ways to access the project and would alleviate traffic (and safety) impacts to any one entrance. Comment 1 In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place, Kekuan000 Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extre" curves ❑rid is narrow with no sidewalks. The Impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TZAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koohurnanu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuonaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 3. Kekuona'oa Place is a County -awned road built to County standards, with the some specifications as all other Dona Vistas roads, including paved swa les as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact an Kekuana`oo Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana`oo Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -cut is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuana'oo Place during the AM Peck period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekucana`oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Comment 4. This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure. like Place. Response 4. Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for o�island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekucana `oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna`oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and PM peak hours, respectivelyl. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EAj. Commenf 5: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, "The Proposed Project wouid not affect public health in any way, stormwaler could be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald September 13, 2021 Mr. Jahn Gerald Milk! Page 3 of 4 conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 1 1 ,200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 5: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5- Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the beady of the EA. Comment 6: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which Fails to address adverse frcfflc impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivisian arising from the project. Response 6: Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed since these internal intersections are probably step controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are nct expected to be significant. Comment 7: The UAR uses a growth rats: of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR, Traffic congestion is very sensiflve to growth rite in a nondinecr, exponential relation. Response 7, Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT� counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1 growth rate. Although we are not certain haw Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used I from the 2025 LRTP forecast. Comment B. The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics _.ti�rrzrr�rar°� in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle Trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 8: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with n© people and no cars, cr if residents will use the bus. The. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used end low-rise and raid -rise was considered. Lova-rise multifamily housing was us, d since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very low standard deviation and an R - squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 9: The TIAR employs can unusually low vehicle volume compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10% variation generally accepted in dory -to -day measurements and thus unreliable. Response 9: The most recent Historic HDOT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kaahumanu Highway section between N ani Kcailuca Road and Hualolai Road (north), Our traffic count taper in August of 2019 wos compared September 13, 2021 Mr. Jahn Gerald Mik! Frage. 4 of 4 to the 2016 HDOT count and was found tc be fairly comparable, It is hard to stay it the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 14: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Koahumanu Highway and Huolalai Road (North) is Inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignatized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monJoring of the intersectio, of Queen Kaahurnariu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequrafe. Where, as here, an intersection pusses more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circulmstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response 1D. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states, "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, tine likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection nay warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project Is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please confact ralrre at (SOS) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, S>t€antec Consulflng Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@stantec.com cc; Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Marjo Jackson, County of Hcawoi`i Planning Department Mori. Ashley From: Ronnie `•Ai i - l;ir,ajstz.6crral.corn> Sent. TLievlaV. 0c�i abPr 06, 20X3 5:11 PM To, Planning Interpret Maid Cc: dLmko LaCaaai rom Subject: R*yal Vista Housing PrcjectEA comments Attachments: imgDO2 p ir, Al'rWCOl.htm; img003.pdd; ATT D2 htm; imgCO4,pclf-, A1`1'€COC)3.htrn 11 .1G 5 l i DEC'I..ARAII"ION OF J011N GERALD MIKI )< JOEL'S Cih'1LALD MlKl- declalr%~, Z aw a resident of Kmial Vistas subdivision. C (xxlnty of Hawai-i Slate of l ldwai-i ll c l r;;t "Cd la: -'d 1e eiol:irtr.at pr + JeC1 that 4ti the subJCCT Of the. I)en-dingDraft Cnvircnmental A&155smeIII subn,ltted by RL'.% Visas Horsing Prrajec:t TIX Map KCY Nos Q) 7.5-Q l .ta16, { +� 1:f,17. 7-6-011 ��1 and -ci ?1 X119 C}I�II ECarIa i7istrict. Hawaii 1a12md, State cf 11awai i affects me personally as Weil its af1eos mV Inlet -ear Irl 'real pmpeny• 1 1-trside Lwitl1In 100 Wards oFthe proposed hjtid deyvelcipmertt project in such capacities. I have fiisthanel kntay.ledge Of the fol IOwing facii and could and ;VLW[d ?esta�r thereto if callte Upon to do 0 ?. I have reviewed the pending DRAFT l;NVIRDNMEM'Al ASSESMiI NI' and anachmenti Lim specifically ur %xraed about die dcstlrustrean ot'Ar-cheoh..r ictal l~cjiurry of the aid Arte beim- c.�vnsider'ed for extcrusive houskng development I iii .•eats ulei, acorn and sassed in IH waii, whn :sperrlt SUM 1z7crs livilag with nth,, Srand pare ntt :i kea'-G -r1 1I�)rii -1nr:I JLiPng WAY I1 1)Lai r'ty the s L; hool year, 1 an -I nd ted weekly J4,-ses at the City Par-, •tn l Rosoutce Center at the MCCuy Pavilion at Ala Moana Park where kids frcm imolulu were busied to learn about .Hawaii We were awcd by talcs of the holualoa sliders built throughout our islands, where warrior chiefs hurtled dov,-ri rock coar&cs at breakneck spuds up to 41) plus MPH on skinny 12 Coot long lay six-inch wide sleds ort marnane hardwood ruruiers, oyer w.agerinq their lands, o,[VeS and Mesa their kveS agaletst lival. Chiefs, nC holualoa experience was at hmr-raising but lhullmg tale far USYOUTlLsterC The HmluAoa Slide its an important l-l�w'ii sn archaeological Feature frml pre-Wester€1 contact tunes that cannot be replaced In l994, 1 took a "Hawaiian Beliefs & Practices" religion class mu,lhl by P lan; Kanakaule, Hawaiian Studies instructor at I irtlwMIN Cr hlaW311 0 H11-0 She said that when pre -contact. Hav aiiaas needed :o carve a canoe or a tiki mod they, wvoulei take a human sacrifice {slave of cap wred enern4 chief) up intc the r°'t' irlrorest and search Or a suitable tree Upon rinding one, 1hic kahima wknuld acnitic-e the human before telling; the free With ad7ff and bury the bodN at the base of the tree (tmding a life fol- a life In thanks to the barest g:'M } Ther they'd use holualoa, I>Ike the one In cluestiDn at the Raul Mistais site. to slide the giant now sacred Ing, dawn The mountain using ropes 01'a violew thundlerstarm ana lightening occurred before the cutting, Ote life of the human saertrice was spared.) Twenty years ago, my u-iFe and I artended a lecture at the I nig Kwachamelia t-lotel kiy fained archeOingist Dr Yosihikki Sinoto who 10116 tllw. &Udt etice t iAL Lite ldtgest ii rclleulsti�lw:al arto'act in the. enrire Pacific Basin was the CTTC: it HO[ta ilOa Slid -e built X19 kettiwL11ue4, KONi Workrn� ,7th his mentor. the renowned lir. Kcnrtc'th Etrlury o tltc. BiAcp !viusQune, they deterir me..%J that the lwcauhoru Slid' catty 6[7 t't°r: fw 11"J 5,550 1't' Z longi_ E'Our Cl7 s.A feet in lseighl and built on a 1260A Q lava 11mv i _,E_ ri ,nti,, the 51ieeW:th ti ! fand hanAI18 flt-11 1. ' u1 :1 %:i were still holes on the rtirL►CIIlti SArfaCL L11,1 % A4l Li k I I „1'i,I I 1,:1"l1;Ig drr,V1r itw AC4;t.AWI U: When winter wa-vrs rinse higll in Koiia, a kahuna would stand un the bi ach aasignal with a vOute iapa 17ag for the race to the beach to stet. The c[i efcaught a big wave to race aginst a c0111petM4 chef ap�'tdinst down the ho ualoa, tate first chief o reach the beach and -Tab the white tapa tlax: was the winner Hawaii was a xarriorsocietu where men died in such etwilests As ire wal ked the upper 2(l O feat slope, Dt Sinota Lald us that Bishop Estate had bulldozed the lukvet-4,500 feet of the hulualc>a ic>build a go'fcourse wwhich one can view Ioday at the cut ir1 the old governmem road mauka of the polf uiurse°s 'Vista Restaurant This marked the desnuctimi ref ar irrepIaceable hisiorical artifact AuweI }:-iow much more sit Ha waii musi be des trovedI We respectfLiI I req Lsest the Leeward P1ann nu Board defer approval of the Roy a] '4'ista pFgjeci UritII aG ckimpleleat-hea]ogica] CVa;uaLion 01-Lhe site is cgrnpleLe. 3 1: do not consider that the archaeological atL]d'Les LA eyed in support of the Drarl Environmental Assessrnenl are aderlriate d 1 am aware that substantial eN dence exists that the land encompassed by the subject land parceIc incIkid es rearures of The I k)Iiialma slide 1nc:!id!na mck wall- that are inadeglaRtcly d scrbbetl as mvicull i-0 tivalIs in tli: arw:hacL,!vpca' stadia, offered in suppori ofdiv Draft EnvirurimcmAl Asscs�ziiar.t I li;1st my co: wel11, C1pv11 117.4• c�sltjariuir mid analysis pvjTbi:mvd by Tim Pulianu store. s copy of which isazrached 6 Ir, 5wn, Ole M411 Environnrmml AimC jrwm cams 110L dkI UsA 9LL Wlt; nl NLti arld analysis suQh that clic impoq, = Havuaii'in cultural smd archacological features can be Eindej5mo 1, lel alone prop dv pwe ervek! 7 At a minintrLrn, the Drab Environmental Assessrnenr mL154 be reVISMI r0 address Lhe localion, data reccwer� and ptvs 'ation of tht Hcilualaa Slide components present on the 4ubject parcel~ I declare: udder penalty of }palm -v LhaL [lie [ores;tiirtg ib Alii Dated- Kailua-Kona. Hawaii, C Octobcr . 10^40, � r S i gn artrre. Prin d ame Jahn , 11,4iki Colonel USAF (retired} Septerr'ider 1.3, 20121 S,tantec ConsufFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek f$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Jahn Gerald Miki Vita email: kinaus*ggmail.com RE: Comments on Cultural Resource Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District,. Mawai'i Island Dear Mr. Miki:. Thank you for the comment letter dorr.<J r ; :toter 6, 20".10, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEAj for the proposed ptoject. Please fired responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: 1 am specifically concerned about the destruction of archaeological leve=ares of the said area being considered for extensive housing development. We m-spectfully request the leeward Planning Board defer approval of the Royal Vistas iolect until a complete archaeological evaluation of the siie is complete. Response 1: As described in Section 3.6 and in Appendix 5 (Archaeological Inventory Survey [AIS] reports) in the EA. the entire project site has been recently inventoried for archaeological resources. One inventory covered 76.1 acres and the other covered S acres. Section 3.6 includes a summary discussion of the findings for Moth surveys that cover the entire site, as well as a discussion of how potential impacts would be minimized. The reports have been submitted to SHPID for review and acceptance. Comment 2: 1 do not consider that the Qrchaeological studies in support of the DEA are adequate. I om aware that substantial evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject parcels includes features of the Holualoa Slide, including rock walls that are inodec,ictely described as agricultural walls in the archaeological studies offered in support of the DEA. The Holualoa ,slide is an important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological feQture from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replQced if damaged or destroyed. Response 2: As described in Section 3.6 and included in Appendix 5 of the EA„ two ArchaeolQgicai Inventory Surveys (AISs) were prepared for the project. As part of the AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evaluated for their significance, The AISs were conducted following Hawaii Administrative Rules 13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by T3-284-6. All 40 sites were considered significant under criterion d because of the information that was learned during the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs ensures that their information is not lost. The documentation done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. September 13, 2021 Mr. John Gerald Milk! Pope. 2 of 3 Regarding the rack walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 2421 1 ) documented. This road is not ver / strcight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as wr-,., r---p,-acted if the site were the remains of a holua. Also, the walls were 1.0Ier in height and is similar in constructed to similar historic era rock walls cc, -=gid along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundory of c Lcr)d Commission Award (LCA) #3660. Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is ca gap in fhe Feature 2 wall at the sarne gulch. It is unlikely that this is a hdlu❑ course since the pcarcllel walls empty into a lame gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a holua in the project site. Comm enf 3: 1 base my Concerns upon the evaluation performed by Team Pohaku Stone. a copy of which is attached. The DEA noes not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological features can be understood let Malone properly preserved. The IAEA must be revised to address the location, data recovery and preservation of the Holualoa Slide components present on the subject parcels. Response 3: In the email provided, there is reference to "the portion of the holLa at the Holuea inn ithat] has rock walls on both sides" and refers to parallel walls within the proposed development area, possibly Site 31182 Feature 2 and Feature 3 wolls which are LCA #3664 boundary walls. Primarily, Mr, Stone's email responses provide accurate information concerning the culturol importance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the near -coastal region between Kailua to the north and Keauhou to the south. The remains of many of these complexes were first mapped by Henry Kekahuna. Mr. Stone correctly states the religious and social importance of he`eh6lua and its connection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures along the coast and in the near coastal region. However', the complexes ore located more than 1.0 km west of the project area and there are no remains of royal,. sacred or sociopolitical complexes, or ea h6lua, within the project area. The existence of o holua within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Stone. As discussed above, there is no documented oral history, archival documentation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a holua course existed within the project earea. September 13, 2021 Mr. Jahn Gerald Milk! Page 3 of 3 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at �808j 494-2039 or by ernail. Sincerely, Sfantec Consulting Services Inc. u i -- Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.iefebvre@stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From: Frankie Hemby 0rankie.hemtyPgmad com> Sera. %esday October tib. 2020 4°52 PM 70. Planning Internet Mail Subject: Royal V?star Housing Pi- jest EA comments Below arc my cc^►mrtimts cin the. Royal Vititst (Kon a) Draft FA, I irttlude it below as text whh h can he search W - or evaluated as text inmead of'seaunirig to a picture file or Forcing, you to handle an nitachment. This hawever EMU I W11 Unable to include a signature. Please accept tho sigilinL! al: t[it, end as my digital signatttre. IF another f6m1 is required. Ict nac know quickly by email- 1=rankic l iembv!cI,GmaiLcom -ter phone 157 5) 748-9003 or 157 13 63-7235, U1:t:'l..f'11Z1 TION 01: 1\,L,%R T 1I1 V1BY 1, MAItY 'I . Hanby dvvlarc; I, I a n a res idcm of Bona Vistas subdi vis in ii. County orilawai`i, State of I lawai'i. The jinn 4iswil, land c. L:vL:I�►lintenI projo l that is the mihjed ot'the penai i ng Draft FnvironniciitaI Assessment suhmttted by Roval Vistas Housing Project l ax .10ap Key lens. (3) '7-6-021:016, 7-6-021:017, 7-0-021 :2.t1 R, and 7-6-02-1.014) North Komi Diswrct, Hawaii. Islaild, State of I luw -iI,I :I.i`:CON 1111C l,c:r,or dly as WA �iw idl"CL:l� 111V ilitc:rc I ill rti:,d I-ProN. -rty. I residc within hMf a mile aftile proposed land develapt-neat project_ In such I have firsthand knuwlerlgeof thy: lullslwing !`acts wid wulti and woulcl tc ti i` Alcr..w Weaned urAm in do sm 2, 1 have rcvicwk•cd the pending DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT including, the Traffic I inpa ,:,, .Analysis Report by SUM 1nIc national, dated May 2020 and attac bed as Appendix, 2 W the DRAFT E:� 4rIItU'NC�'li:�l l rel_ r1:�SL'��.`1+11`.F� 1 , 1 am specitiCall}cnlnccrncct ;thnrit a��'CI'riC trattl4; 117i�ac,i.S hi7tll witliln and Will701.11 IN: KoTI i 4 iOJ% Mjbdi�isivii That are rot i1 -111y or accurate,v addretisecl in thr SSFM Tratfc Impact Analysis Rei1od, 'I raffic and the SSI'M "I -riff o Impact Analysis Report. are dis-cussed in the bDd,� of the DRAFT ENVIRONN'i NTAL ASSESSPYIENT. at pp. 48-56, 67 and 71. 3. hi the Kona Vistas suhdiv cion. the proposod pu►jeot relies wi the us -,A- a sub tai Aird s K kuana`€ u Place. Kekwatia`oa Place is vet'v ;steep. has limited sight distance--. due to extreme curvcs and is narrow with no sldewaLks. `Che irnpaa`t of increases traffic arising irmn Phase I mid Phase ? buildouts of the Royal Visms Housing Project is inadequately addressed in the SSFM Traffic Impact Aimlysis Report. •� !tfti l fiwuscs iraittad can impacts along C uum Ka'ahurncaata Highway. l mi particularly ccancemcd thw a ddiatg atUm] ,-rouS r'eltit Je trips to ailid l'rL)m n sepatraale subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents alum;. Kekxanwoa Place. l consider that the Planma g Dg'�artmc:nt sh,3uld require the applicant Io aaddl-ess these 4. The DRAFT LN IIRC)N1'viFNTAf. ASSES' MEN'r requires CVaIu4011 Of, aanOne-IDdICTS, ruh-ease secrandar-a{ impacts, Such as population cherrages orefte.'viv onptrhfir'./ije lef es, Sty Chapter 11-200. 1 13. I-laawaii Administralk-c Rules. Instead of sQaatarely acfriressing these issues, however. the DRAF .F F'SV 11ts }VM FATll.l. ASSI,SSMEN simply ignores thern, claim as, that "Not averse smviid y cfl;ect aarC cK[Wcd SAICC the L[L:V :Isrlalaar~rat Would utilize existing inliaastructure, provide infill h0usinL!, anti is not expected to reAx in substantial demands, to County services." II is a serious orni5sicn for the DRAFF ENVIRONN4 ~NTAL ASSESSIVENT to fail to a ddruss (he 1'aa)tonti;al aalver.gc impaacLs SMI' increasing the tatie Of sashmuri laanI cxisting infnodrucitare, like Keku ana•oa Place, 5. The DRAFT 1 NVIRONM1A l A]. .ASSFSSMFAIT aaddresscs adverse traffic inipaacts only In the context c wIidher the pr( lied wvuId Hai e rr .arrfrrienrrud srcla•ers V i':'Jjec'r c piibUc:' lteah1:. The Applicant claims. 'Thc PRPl—w)Sed f rodec:t woulcl acyl a ffcci ptalrlac: ht:aNh in :tnyw ay-; stnrrnwater would lie ipI?I'cpfia Lely disposed of in drainage struelures. Trtat'tic iina pacts havebeci1 #aalccia iaaatc earcfW ct)zisIdcratisita iia pro Mt:ct desiL" Emphasis Lidded. This hall conclusion does not raddre & potcriiiaal adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11-2(M- 1-13, 1 a-wah Adm iii ki nati ve Rules. "llic Planning Department should not accept the DR ALFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT'S reliance on the SSf M 'I'ratfi c Impact Analysis Rcport;, wEeh has die following deficicrac:ic' projccl: ai_ failure to address adverso ti.d fi L7 tirn; wr, Nov in the Kona Vistas sari,] . :•.:;.� t.. b. The SSFM Tramftic Impact Aaialyais dtcport u,= a grx)%,th tate of I "If,, in contrast to the ?°'o- gmwili rate: cmployeti by the 2018 Witcher Engmeering I rabic impact Analysis Report. Trafflic Congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-hiii:ar, ex.poncill al relatrrsti. C. 'T -he SSFIY1 Trn ie Impact Analysis Report dries not recoil ze multi-gcncratiuna] licusing char deristic-s comnion iri Hawaii according to census data €old 11L-dy uadcWsrimartcN- tial ly vchicle trips attributiiblo to buildout of Clic prormse'd l+i ijec't; d. T'hc SSFNol Traffic Impact Ann]> -,is Report crtiptUys arc uriusu, Ur 1(jW VC111CIC v,OIUtile• rs 95.1 ,etticl ibi-':' erthbouad Queen Ka`ahuriranu highway on the sulected dates of April Si). 2014. a weekday and ,August 4, 2019, a Salurrloy. evnipa►red with the 018 Witcher Erly,in ringTralYI+: Itmlpact Analysis Rc;purt, which reported 10.57 vehicles fi}r .fankiury 14 JJLd 15, 2010, hath wcckduyso The unrasro.ill} li,%N rCl><N1-1eri Vehicle vc)luaPic cif 85. k also at srikds with FIgLIT : 4 k `the SSF(v1 Traffic, Impart Analysis kcpoft which sho: vs approximately 1050 vehicles per 11CLir In 2016 for Northl)ucuid Queer KA',ih�ur.AIILJ 11i.Okway UL 7 u,rn. Tlie ilifli.rvnve ktl tiolunle is ralcirC 01UH rirauhlc tl1c iriatxignum Ititrriation gencrally accepted M day -ID -day rnc.asurcmuntw and thus unreliable: C. 11w reco mi-nei-id a [ion by SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report for a rouad,h()L11 11 011edl Ka%hutnavu Highway and Hualrtlai Road (Notth) is inuorusisiuiit with the traffic corridor. lntei'st�C[iVns t]t rt p&s warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concen-is for the guvcrnmvn1 f. The recommendation by SSFM Iraf is lmpai�f Analysis Report rear monitoring of the inlersection apt Quecii Ka'ahawanu i-lt&h ay and Kuak-Ini Highway is inadequate. W here. ,a� hese. an iritcr%ekaion pa;sc: rrorc 111ran one warrant under alt conditions, it shOuld be prioritized for wtu{iy ---vul deign efar signal for instatlation. This circumstance mill be uxaccrlaata d by the proposer] project, 7. Wr houschold has per-,una.11y observed surric: vc;ry da ugc;rous vvenLs and situa vans- pertaining ro trallic inside the Kona Vi das Suhilivi, tion and on reads and lnterswians in the project arca defined iii the 3 DR-AF11- ENVIRC]?VMENTAL ASSsFS�M FN'I'SSF%,l Traffic irnpaci Analysis Depart. The followins isjust a parlial lki of mclnnrahle events: a. Everits laside Kcena Vistas Subdivision: I , klimv xua i-om; o ti wlrrwlti ru awng aw' ik 1p sLp at Karttt:hamalu and Lei Tani Sr- at mull speed_ ' Man, I WoLl'iLln; C.hI, % °lticlrw rrraking stup L iii, lLarneham ELI u and Lel [an[ 4t. 3. Uiwdner arae landscapin7- vuhicie; parked in Iho rrafiic lanes on Kaniellaniala St 4- SrKooI Strq rnm—,;nip- diiii-ble ye- Ikiw lure and speeding Lm Kwivliainjh, tit. 5. Commercial car hauling semi -trailer imuck croi� ing dnvble yelknw lure on K a itim-A m nala Si T--uNcd Ir7t47 Kona Vistirti fi-uw lark of ,pace tar tum. Lie*lbrrund liont 1-ord dealen;hilr. 6 l uildiq k:ontr',lALer parrk4M in IT iffiia lane on Leilaiii SC hiss Safi La3ko St: AA we ti:rrw4 l ih'• pickup was nkat %isrl7kK, but vraS left ir'I rr"tlrL I:rrir'w J1141 WC liaa, t•• y, j.LlLtn11 !Ile erupt} Mick, Commercial vellicler "eding ill SubdiVOCiOn, 111k I..,_IL LL; 1PIA 11011. laapart1:al ti- Ul'N. tiV31[Cr ciclavar7Y. Pcit contre1. Ix}t+l JeatncN, ihr�ip Ir.".i l - , ri r, T, ' ll 'I l:.i Ic".Il t"•S.riC 3 Cask k° 1 17ik'l0.� h l°k ews uutsidi-- Kom Viscus Subdivision ill slUtl� arc a tar S.SF M TZAR, 1. Weitd I'm f al. Ll 4r :ue'l II 11,L11Ir. lu gLrt Litter wrui.ttg tuuw tr.l Quiuv a KtCahumauau h[;hway. 2: 14.� hiTw7 l tiro LAO wr :aril rru:ilr't, ri, r iMo 1614 liaMic low it Quutm K:i'uhumanu hrjahwav a. Lascbcund Out Lako St, and uiublc lim vo inio tuawiv lane gel Q"vetr Ki'a llIMI.rrru higliu.ty huMlUKW ahru iraitiv blca:ked nz, ^sy iii tnrning [ane .t F WI,Ibourecl on LaW St. and uruablt to -et iniv thru EraIli %:]a nc at Oueen Ka'ahumwiu highway became leis turn lane a Cull .uid b6ckinp o-.,.•. eti, to tutu uAT - L}k:w.6, 6vj—,. d :y lcs a►1 the im lae signal %%ticli was;7 u n acceptaflk- v, a it i ng time. i. SDulhbeuad crlr Queen Kta'ahurriamr hiLhway and unahI p 141 gel inns iurnitlg Imic tai Lak-u Si bccaause. thru traffic was ble<king aeons w iutating Lane 41- Sa uthl:Kl n7d on igen U'ahumanu hiSh%ay and unable to get into thru traffic Line_ hccaukc left tuming lam wa% full and additiovad vehicics turrrrl% la't;r hlo.Aeal 1itCL"iT.. I. L %pericnccd stop and t).o trafric titan Henry St iii L. iko fi; rn nue Scptrit7lsCr ClurrTi t .i 1Tarr]i.l.wmec with ' er4 fea toamas on the road_ A. Cih,t:rtieJ rrlltrl �,L:hiClr-..'flUracC�edMts onQuecn Ka'ahumanu iughway and intrrsecijcmr , ai Laka Si.. Xuakini h i �;Ikw ay Puapuaanui St and NaLni kailua Dr Two ac:c'idr:•TI!!, had raultipic rolled vchi6as. L), Ob.'�.-rtied the aftermath of many more accidems w ah crust, herJ k , hip eS WMI fair ILIW tttaeits. I+.t. Rid to turn am o <a sire=t reit tin my trip plan to yield rrr an emtWrency to --hide artrwid Ilan Sunset Eli. s4a viou, Cirv!c itrej 1 I Lxperienced walit! nip ve ur diArai tdw � ,Jit+ct; bc4md our vchEL:le ck-)Me Et, ,t +c rmvhinY %inns tat hrtvLL ;c+ InEI tntp rite right whomliitr while mtippitrg, wrruwly avoiding a rear -Laid aQi;1d.m- 1?. Haw a]-ultirleo ftierids that were in rtarend acctd"im that towlcd their vehizlcs nuid in ,-nc Ca -,e LLJ,,re l neck and back in) u:--� that r-,qiircsl trc:,at,iwnc arLd Ic-m u.4' 11.1.1 VS, 13. Obwr-%cd drivers wi I lcrtr% ,4iry -t EhX 11,1VC mated on gFt�en l q&+ w itttE.+cEi Waturtl; fur the turn arrow a;. PcX,-ACd rttt,.i It"W O1 14_ twined a:)hjL-vty in ftroad ti•.at 'ti:tsere lost ar Nown frow Irutik or trailers with urtaec:tued lewd,, 15, 1 fear rrrterg.cnc,, vehiclr tilt E , 011 ill cTn Ka'aahum.aiu hid*,hw+ y inkillIple times t -very dsay. S. In sunt, Clic Draft Envirkini lcia,ti atxl SSFNI Trttlfic IMPALA ! nLdy-.,14 Ripon dtws m)i prosent sufficient. credible fats Putti Lunalysis arch th.tl I lie Awme impacts on existhig infrastructure anci rusulting rmm increased traffic can be titfly ujlticrsti► d and rc,;uk iI� ttp rsl�n:�te t� crnment plf iuiin altd [espolIst. luaa:Iwn: Pa=me accept the below as my tieggit.rl sigIittturc .Mary T. Hentiby Da.tccl 0cE hoer C, 20.20 61 Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsufFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek l$QSI 494.2039 Ms. Mary Hemby via email, frankie.hemby`tt gmail.com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Visnas Housing Project. North Kona District, Hawal'i Island Dear Ms. Hereby: Thank you for the cornment letter dated October b, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts bath within and without the Kona Vistm subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response l: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below, a_mment 2: In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies can the use of a substandard roadwcy, Kekuanaoa Place. i eWan000 Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahumanu Highway. I am purticularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from o separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the appricant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuana'oa Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the some specifications as all other Kana Vistas roads, including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact can Kekuana`oa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana'oo Place to Royal 'Vistas its not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAL estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekucana'oo Place during the AM Peck period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods. which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2021 Ms, Mary Herrhy Page. 2 of 4 Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary irnpacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increosing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana `oo Place. the number of vehicles projected to use Kekouno'oa dace is the Phase II Outbound traffic (22 ❑nd 9, for the A.M and PM peak hours, respecfivel�. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, 'The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; stormwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 1 1.2I)0.1-1 , Hawaii Administrative Rules, Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in part 5. Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed cnd analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment 5: The Plonnfng Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment b: The fIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TZAR. Traffic congestion is very sensifiwe to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response f Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not slow an fncrease in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lang Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used I% from the 2025 LRTP forecast, September 13, 2021 Ms, Mary Herrhy Commenf 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics con--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response l: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will hrave 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Trcnsportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and law -rise cnd raid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has o very low Aandcrd deviation and on R- squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volurne of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2€ 19, a Saturday, compered with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at adds with f=igure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 10-50 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Koahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the r-naxirnum 10% variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. Response $r The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahumanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Road and Hualalai Road (north). Cour traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDQT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TZAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Koahumanu Highway and Huralralcai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TZAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Koahum❑nu Highway and Kookini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design at a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by Phe pro -posed project.. Response 9: The .Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states, 'The satisfaction of ca traffic signal warrant of warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.'' There are ether considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where September 13, 2021 Ms. Mary Herrhy Page. 4 of A an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project_ The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Comment 10; Our household has personally observed some very dangerous events and situations pertaining to traffic inside the Kona Vistas Subdivision and on roads and intersections in the project area defined in the DEA"s TIAR. Response 10: Unfortunately, these events are not unique to this neighborhood or this part of the island. The proposed intersection and minor connector roads would be bunt to County standards tc ensure their safety. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Sfantec Consulfing Services Inc. r Michele Lefebvre. Ph.D. michele.lefekavre.'tantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kana Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Howcai'i Planning Department Mori. Ashley From Mark Powell Sent: 7ugsday, October 06, 2020 4.33 PM To: Pla ming Internet Mai! Subject-, Roya! Vistas Houvng Project Attachments- Royal Vistas "raffic Pictures.pdf Attached is a twref description cf Me West side traffic issues. John 1.16585 To Whom It May concern, All the residents on the West side of Hawail Island have a major concern with traffic and safety. There is a proposed development called RaVal Vistas Housing Project that will adversely affect the already backed up traffic situation on the Queen Ka'ahunnanu Highway and Kuakini Highway and could add 1,000 carr trips or more a day. Lake Street intersection is already a tattle neck because of the 3 south bound lanes, Z turning and I south on Kuakini.. Picture #15 hows north bound traffic. cn Kujk;irii h 1ivir`v, tr, trlrn across .9out h bound traffic on Qucen K to head north on Xr,ik-rls 1-iat hway which is very dangerous. Picture 41 also shows 2 rner-ge lanes rrom lower Ktia sini onto the highway heading south with a very short_rdiastarce to move into a lefttrrrn, right turn, or StraighL lane. All of this traffic movements causes backups and accidents. Picture #2 shows the lanes a little further south c.)n the highway toward the Lake intersection. Tis area is a real bottle neck with traffic t);�v irk to move into a lames depending where you are wing. Picture #3 shows the tako Street iritersectiort. T"his intersecflcn is very congested because of all the movement there. 'vehicles are headir p north. south, turning left: right, in all directions. Adding tt7 the problems is the lacl that Maiuka bound Lake there are 4 business commercial driveways located on the ciorner, the yell Ga} Station and the Ford [dealership, Also there is no merge or accelermion lane from west bound Lako turning right (North Bound) onto the Highway. Because Lako Street is so lousy novo traffic backs up on Lako to try and enter the hi6hway in either direction - Adding this new development without proper planning will brim traffic to aro even great backup and Create a high danger of ac6clents. Part'Of the issues could be alleviated if the State, County, and Devel1)per5 WOLId work together. Build a signalized intersection bringing all the Royal Vistas Housing Project traffic (Mauka to Makai�, Kuakini`s, and the Queen K's into 1 intersection. This would be much safer than it is navwr and with what's being planned. This would also improve the 'Lak.o Street trltersection because it would eliminate the 2 Kuakini merge lane heading south. Also Me State and County must think about the fuel widerning of beth the ween and KLakini highways. If this develOPME 7t is approved before the highways are widened, the developers should be conditioned to widen the highway frvrwting there property frontage now. I know this has teerr a rFquirement on the mainland in some cases.. Summary Build 1 Signalized intersection bringing Kuakinii, Queen K highways, and all the Royal Vistas Housing Project traffic together in crie place. This will heli, traffic flow and greatly improve safety far everyone. Require the developers to widen the highway along there project frontage. Require the !"VPlopers main road through the development go Mauka to Makai so there is the lower way ur an upper way out safety). Marrka to Makai is an ekisting County requirement. Dnn't approve the development until the Highway is fully widened fn all directions and a new lnter�ecrtion i5 built. Mahalo John P. _ . - .-e =_ I, m i,sr?-j2.w FL. -i w .. IL Iwo , .. T'Cr •I. i y � n September 1.3, 20121 Stantec Consutaing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tel: l$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Jahn Powell via err hail: rnorkpSO4 att.net RE: Comments or the draft Environmental Assessrnenf and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Hosing Project, North Kana District, Fiawai'i Island Deur Mr. Powell: shank you for the comment letter dated 0;ictober 6. 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: Lako Street intersection is already a bottle neck because of the 3 south bound lanes, 2 turning and 1 south on Kucakini. This intersection 3s very congested because of all the movement thorn. Adding to the problems is the fact that Mouka bound Lake there are 4 business commercial driveways located on the corner, the Shell Gas Station and the Ford Dealership. Because Lako Street Is so busy now traffic bads Up on Loko to try and enter the highway in either direction. Adding this new development without proper planning will bring traffic to can even great backup and create a high danger of accidents. Response 1: The Traffic Impact Analysis Report {TZAR) in the EA acknowledges the �_-ottleneck that occurs at Lako Street. The traffic signal timing and phasing can be charged in the interim from split phasing to protected or protected/permitted or permitted phasing on Lako Street. The long terra solution is the widening of Queen I(Qahurncnu Highway. The widening of Queen Kaahurn anu Highway from Henry Street to Karry III has been in the long-range transportation plan. Comment 2: Part of the issues could be alleviated if the State, County, and Developers would work together. Build sa signalized Intersection bringing all the Royal Vistas Housing Project traffic (Mauka to Mlakai). Kuakini's, and the Queen lb's into 1 intersection. This would be much safer than it is now and with what's being planned. Response 2: There are plans to re -align Kuakini Highway of Queen K,o'churnonu Highway as shown in Figure 6 of the TIAR. This shoves a new intersection just south of Pucipucl anui Street. The 20T O Kona Development Plan shows the roadway with bike lanes and pedestrian facilities. This new intersection, with a new intersection at Kona Vistas driveway, and the signal at Lako Street would need to be coordinated. This is outside the scope of this project. Q)� September 13, 2021 Mr. John Powell Pope. 2 of 2 Comment 3: The State and County must think about the full widening of both fhe Queen K and Kuokini highways. If this development is approved before the highways are widened, the developers should be conditioned to widen the highway fronfing there property frontage now. Response 3: The development is building a dedicated right turn lane. From a traffic operation standpoint, widening a short section of Queen Ka'ahumaanu Highway to 4 lanes (2 through lanes in each direction) is not justified. Vehicles would have to merge back after the short widened section~ creating another bottleneck. Therefore, the project cues not propose making these �mpravements. Comment 4.: Require the developers to widen the highway along the project frontage. Require the developers main road through the development go Mauka to Makci so there is the lower way or an upper way out {safefy. Mauka to Makai is an existing County; requirement. Response 4: There would be a right tura into the development. In the professional o„inion of the traffic engineer, widening Queen Kochurnanu for a short section, since vehicles will have to merge knack into 1 lane, Therefore, widening the highway is not proposed. Comment 5: Don't approve the development until the Highway is fully widened in all directions and a new intersection is built. Response 5: The widening of Queen K.a'ahumanu Highway has been discussed anc.. planned for many years now. The completion of this project is not in Kona Three LLC's control. The TZAR in the EA includes analysis of future traffic projections anc: includes mitigations that show that while the delay would increase, the overall intersection level -of -service (LOS) would be acceptable. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the FA, please contact me at (308) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Starrtec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawai'i Planning Department Mori, Ashley Frarn: Hemby <wayrae.herrlbyPgrnail.coan} Sent.. F,'onday. Octcher 05, 2020 4.4S PM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: ccicnyb arta Cohotmail.corn Subject: Ri, y al Vistas HQuSing Pro-!ect EA Cornments Attachments: R•,yA Vistas Comments by EarLa,a Repasky signed 2020 Det 3.pdf [: yita., laa�c :Ira}' c,,uc i�c,riw +I�Ar.e trciait.i 'a ;iri :;i + (1!il 322.0181) have attachEd a Igred and scanned copy to this; email. I have the s rnz contents in the email helDw in a form that i6-ca,rchahlu hul �kitliow signature. I1^'I,allalkr. ti.arlaaM RCI`1,sky 05-152 Kail ICIIitIIILllll t kiti.ILia-Kona, IIawaii 740 I)I -( I-%I1,.A I i()y t Ili I I A R B A R A 1#I1 I'NS11".Y I. liARBA k .% N1'I'ASKY, duckrc;: ;. I ctan a rV,.Llc:it,}t'I-1JW;3ii,' Kona Vistas subdivision, G-1.,It', a=I':layvui'i, St4al'�:ofli,'awai`i. The: proposed land til'2ti°e10pI1'XIII I)T- jCCt th It a5 the sublect ol'thV PCIlding DraalI 1 :''. ii,,iI mi -ii -%,;scs,;iin rnl wuhmr.11ted by Rt yal �Visias I ls}�I;ing I'roJecl i'ax Map Key Nc�ti , (3) -6-10 11,I) I fi. ii.!,a.' I ;1117, 7 -r* -021:0P%', iIid ?_c, -(►'I, II IS) N(111h Kt Ina DisinuI, Hai�'Lit 1 Isl:iadl Swtetif HF j-,tiai'i alSCols inn [wi' ,t-.i,i,I = :ati a%olI ,as cal'l�,O1 n v IIitL'.I"`It In rt'.,:11 Twol'rc:nY. I re"i lie 1A•it111n h'LlIf tt nil lc ot'the pioI)ii,c l land deli clvial is°;7I projc'l:I. Ili st,c;h I have firsthand krll, wlcdg.-a sit the tealloAing facts c:-iultl and wt43 I.,: Iik' thcrar:10 iI ,:,4I1k•1 UP0111 lV oil, W. 2. Him re, Iicvod that: ptking, DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL 1SS,-S�MENT Ia14llrr,II11,4 ILL °l .ICIic 11tI a 0 Analysis Repurt by SS III lnterivaalun al. al,ltcd V'Lji, '0'11 �mu+_I aiiiiiL ed as Apllr'airl9It 111e I.0, A1- l Ff V•IRCINN1ENTAL, ANSI- NA—I1.'% I I aaal,I-Pcaial-ivall> yhmd LXkE-i,E tr,IC1ic impacts holh within anal without that Kona ViAa, ,Lllkh-- I ot-n that art nol C'Ialk- c,r �aclLli:i tht SSFhi Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Trail ic- and the SSFM Tru Mc Imn;pact ,final-,sis Rqx-irt. arc clist.iaACli in the body-0fthe D11A1"t ENVIRC)NM EN, TAI A NN I SS ;\Il IN] cat lap. 48-5h, 61 jnd 11 3. In the l niku Visia.N sulldi.Alsicama. Ski,: rr-opi I prui c:i rulaU:, On Ilaw LLNU 0f:1 ,;rh, ri.Jvd and roadway, Kekuana'ou Plaacew Kekuana'o a Piave iw +,ery steup. lam IIiIiiied sight 1staanc:es slue ter r:ktmrrnt rur�-us w -id is rawmow %with no sldewilks. 'l'ie impact of inereised traffic al-isantig i0m Phase 1 and Phase 2 buLtdouts of the Royal Vistas housing Prcaject is inadcqudtc.ly .addressed i i i the S S I W JtaITIL IIYipaet ArialIysis Report, which t4cIises iaEst vajct mi IiiIpacls a tong Queen K4ahuinanu Highway. I am panicularly + on,;crnc>d that adding numerous ve;hicic trip4 to and from a separate subdivIsIon will prvscrat dangers and io resideltts along Kckuaria`oa Placo- I consider that dic Planniray Department should require the applicant to address these cancc!rns_ 4. T-te DRAFT ENVI.ROlslMEN- 71' Al. A,SESYv11'NT MI., c:wa]Witicrrl Of, 4111[mg s�rther:�, dtivvr� a �ctttid:ar} impacts. such as population changes or etterts oa public faca'.•ltics, See C'haptm 11-204,1-13. Hawaii A+.lawnistnillvc; Rules. Irstoad Of ;,yma,trcly atcl(IressitIIJr 11 c!CW is.,laU�. however. the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL 1SSLSSME 7 simply ipures them, claiming Lh ai "\r) ud1, �ryrsc secondary effects arc expcecd since the development would Utilize existing intiastnuctc.rr, pio,,idtr infill housing, and is not expected xo result in sijh,!.ianii;ll deniatnds to County It i� ca tiesac`Uti UIT]ls, aloe ;or the: DRAFT ENVIRO:tiMENTAL A-SSLSSNI NT to fail to addre,S thi. potimt.ai. LiLlvcTse I1a1pad, of incroawing the usc of substandard existing i n trasrrtaeture. like Kekttana' as P lace_ 1 61500 5 The DRAFT ENVI ONIMENI'Al tiSMLNZ addlres;cs id,,crse tral'lic Impacts claly Ili the context of' whether the prOO-Cl WOUld Have: a ;Uh�?;Ml L11 aclvcr_ uffc,:1 t r1 I1L.hI1c health_ The Applicant clainis. "The Proposed Project would not al` e,�i I,Liblic health in an,,, tivuy'_ t,1oniik%Liter would he apprtupriatt:k LhSptysed ut'M dra:aage straotur . Traffic. I.m.J_kLIS 11 ave been taken II IIL:i {.i1ri'f Gl telltSl'Ll ewl'ation in proje l dee tgn " 1-inphasls added.'Ilus hold cL,nch,eslt IIId0c, nol .ddiL C4% l,c,riri'i.31 :tk'VCPSc:.it7pn; ,1;.t�z required h>y Chipier 11-200. 1 -13. Hawaii Administrative Rules. i i 6, The lel inning- Departme-m should not accept the DRAFT ENV IRUN MI.:.1 IAL NSSESShdEM's reliance on the S S F M Trn6k C Illpacl Analysis 1 opori, which has the fulIL)%vink; dctic1L-nL:ICS a. failure to address ad%urst traffic in1ilaL:Is wIIhirl the Kona VVsti,. is su1)divi :v11 aNS111frtM) 111c 1111-c>jcct; b, Fhe S 5 F M TraflEic Irttpoct A ialNsis Re1,L)rt uses a grt?'~4 i]i rate k i f I"°n, in ontratst to the 22'6 gr'cW1h rate cmrfloyed by the, 2018 Witcher En -nee 'n- 1'raffic Impact Analysis Roport.-rrrlffic congestion is r'cry stnsi'c tax gowth rata in a nan-linear, cxIx,nentiLd 7121 1tialtl; c. The 5SFNI Traffic lsnprcl Aaaly'si_w Rep -jut does, nuL recogi ize u!tulti-gertenllional hul.isin characteristics common in I-Iax aii acoo rding to censLIS data and IL1keI�, L111dCfC1Imates dal IN vehic.te taps aft ril_•wtltab le to 11-iuild0tlt t,t 1114• proposed pr,1l,°tt� d. The SSFNI i ,111iL- Imp;:i;r X13 SIN ;i RUI,,,II Cn,I)IP , iin 1,MIsth[lk' low t,chitily volutric Ltl'953 v6ielt: 1vr 4+ I' %1 111 '11 `I. ,1 %vL-a`i�dil' '.ti d AuGl1+t 1. I+1"tl' ,wltrl�i Iw1t;� L t•ta.�hl;1li; lldi I. lk, 11 Illi ,cIL1�xl 41-,!las t}I }rll l ,('• `t. :Li!1r:1:1',', �rPinpnrCi1 711-L1 ,'( l,'i k4' rClter I--11Jnoc`.I'11'ifI r-lf c ll'• p i4t A aky-;is Itcpom which rcp4lrTcd 101 : L1nultry 14 ai1 J 1 . _1(l] n, h;,Ah w ckdlly',. I he L11i,LSLIJIly knN t L:ex )rtL!d vclltcic %Lylau1 a u!"85-1 as 1•.^ s .f' t+s'1:' 41'1111 Figuiv .t -d 11 L- �:;_%l 1 ;,1"lie 1111Fp 11.1 AI : I�SJS RepOri, 1050 1LiIll k` 1'41 0111-111. 201ri J'0I_ r\AI-Jl'7� 1 it 1 I,r!1t,;_1� Kaahuma.ltl Ili0*hwayal 7 a,ni-'I lie thherenc In volume is 111t• L 01,111 I11,1.XSIIUJF :11 k.iri,ri,i L1 ,°1 illj'ittc °I1icx1 era flay=tfi)-Clay tnr; sLyrcllscllts,llL1 111ur• unrch.11-ilk e. Th. r. t i 111iui1(1.1z1 sn b' *i'141 l riif3ic impact Analysis Rupert fi r a rourtdabouill at [wren Kaaliun"ranu High,ma� .11is1 H UNIAI11i lttlaj:1 (NI.lrth) i,, ince+lltilstL2iA 444 thlc Iral- icl 4 c_vi-ridor. Inters tions that pais wan"a>nts but remain unsignaIizcd pres cal tragic safety Iiability ccnc.tWras FO1.11le �, i} t'rn1nun1 I I II: ! cc( IItIr1:Lslltlati(fn fly NSF%% GruITie Irilpact AmiI%wiN RLTNirt I i i r tui on i I ori n p, () F t h c irl r,ccllicii tot 1)ucen K. 1, 11)111VIAll. L 11111lir:k 1 i1111I 1tivakltlt Highwa}' is iinadequiiie. heir-, as ltt'rc, 011 ill L421LCL'11t11l p"ISSt'5 Intitu Ulan olio kI, arr6allT un, 14:r .I'°k c int Ii,ioiis, 1t should he ptinrki7cd fL"ri mLdY and eke"Iv11 o t sign.I t, F1' ir,4ta at 11111 "1111; cirt:lut]tiltlllue La ;11 '.1'c by the proposLA pToje :L.. 7 let 31111!, rlll' L_7lralz Envirenmental Assessment and SSFN4 Traffic Impact 1ialysis Rtport Acts flat pi-c.scnl sufficl1,'TP!. E•, -Chihli' i' 1 is and amilys1s; such that the al'er3e imp,7cts Ott existing infrastructure and re~,tdtnig fiVID increased traffic can lice fully urtthl rslcicd and rc-;ult in apprvoai : government planning and re;;pc rSe. I dcclarc wider penalty of perj ut y that the fiarcgoiny. is true. Dated- Kailua-Kona, 1-1at►rai'l.1-X-tobe<r 3. 20211. S io Mature: Printed "no: Barbara Rep�asky 2. I)l.t`i.r11 1I ION OF i3r1.RFi.w11: A 11.1 ASKK`r I. 13ARBAkA 1M,l'ASKY. declare: I I .ttlt a re iciarn i.1 I1;3e� t,a .' iron] Visus suixiii isWil. C'a_kulaty t?f I iawwati' i. Slate ot- I fawa i. I he IsrOPOSC-d 1a11J dQVCh.,P11W11C pFOJUCI that is tars° sublou (it the pen-ififlg Draft EnvircrCitrtenla) Ati�essment snhmilled by Ks►val Vi.Nuts HutziTig 11'tt►j l Tax Mall KEN NOS. t ; ) 7-6-021.016, 7-6-02 1:1117. 7-6- (12 1:(119, -6-(121:(119, and 7.6-lr2 1 0Ili North Kdinn District, Ilow4'i isluiw, Swtt tial. Hawaii ul'ILCtS MU pirxiliti;tllV i13 Well as .' ff-ecis n)i ottrol in real propvi•tr' I XE.wttlG t411h111 K:ilf'a nlih: i-,fiho prcapwwkf lta;id tlCV'ClalPTttrllt pro,ic :1. In such c;.lp;►�i.ies, i la lwt lirstla;lnd l MU%viitig I`�1cls sinal Could and titouId t431i1} tltcroo if called upon to iIrl sit, _' 1114'o� rw.'ais wL%l lltc 11A:11chng.. I)fi<AF'I 1�NVIR{}NN1kN 1 A1,�%SSF' SMT-'-\. - ]` including 1he'I r tri Impad Ana r•si, Pwprirl h} SSf %I Ira cru ai'10 LL dated Ma% 7-11"0 aTld aliaubcdas Appendix 2 To11w DIRAFF 1 -NV IRON'V FNIAl ASSf,SSMIN-1 I aura specitic,1fIV CL-11kCt'3`I W ubvui u&, erw trAic iMPLI N �KalF1-willlin 11 nil svirh+lL11 IhV Knnat ViST11S SLI hdi` IS 1011. 1hal me nail tilll,. or accurately addre—med in thw';.1;FM -1 rules: Impact Analvsi; liqnr1. I raffic Gild Lhe SSFY1 Traffic f npact F'4nalw%is Rerx3n ,ars discusscd in the hody o0he 1.1RAF] UNNIRON'4 EN IA], SSI,.'tiS14. FNT. at pp. 49-56, 67 and 71. 4_ In tl-w Kona Vistas -;ub livisl+pft, t11i prup,.,sod project fells on 111V ww 411*u ,gthsim—Ou°d roadAay. Keka,,mal'Ou Place. KiAuunu'ou Place is very stccp. ha; 111,mitc! ,i2,hl atistactoes duo to w.`xlrijrre ci=r�xs and is narrow with ail-iJer•wa1k-,. The isnp"act cel° irici`v3xS0 ITaflic;. ansino Irt�m ITI;!ic jud l'ha.ic -' huflJoiws.ofthe 1 os ,il Vislas I lousing prajc:c:.t i; inaJequawk ddd r4: 'O -J ill cil,' S S NI ILII , l „ 14.. 1r'ar41 a1n i I I r1 _• QIit !• I l E ai&unianu ii1 Fl7wayt I :teat pa r -ti ulaarly wneeme:d that add r11. v 11,' '0111, Vehirlc rr'ipw 1`0 and trmn it bvparatC 101 PTCSCM i.1c7T gus 1nd Cttrlgestion to residmis akh)nC K.ckL utict, Pla%x. 1 4r!11sidcr iha( Llic PIliataliIll; [ ejwrurrc-ut ti1itwid iuLlaij6 1lie app lieaiiI it) address lhe; �ukx�rrt Fhv DRAFT ENVIRON MENTAL +SSE SIS ENT rcquirL�s evaly aziun ur. Ltattc nu sstItcr:,,. tit A • .Ni, svi whi.111Y pmlks4'�r. Sift p))a rrf+rruIto c'Prwi e'v ear v f vfr £xrr Ipuhfry ,fir, ."In k.ti_ ties i'hal5fc�r i ."(10. 1 -1 i I!rm n1 A.1mmi-antive Riilc:s_ lnti10A(i Of sgiNlrely ACICIT'C ksIn ,111CSC issues, hv%%c\,cr, the DRAFT F',—VIl ONVEN IAL. VSSFSSNIENI sirttpl%' i!�n(Or>rs Ll UT11, s:l<aiialrrr� Ll1a.l ";*J„ :t;d%VT 1C t:CL11lJUQ CH'%xu, ary wxpcctL-d since the dcveIopmiml v%cull utyli7e �:Xis,ing! 111fras1j-u, tur;, pruVide infill 110tt;ilt4, aUld is 1101 tsprwteel la-, FC1,4111 in sttbwl,.atti.ep demand-; w O)unl;' wnriccs.' It k a scrious Pmissicn for>Ihc DRAFT ENVI ONNIFNTAL AASI S INIEti l Lu tail Ito addu6:�-w Clic Jxrt4ratial 1aJ,,txs ia.rrVi t1 J14:.L."e Of .suh lja 4urs,l existiing infrastructuric. like I' ekLlatlwl'00 Pla- 3 I'lt�• 04 RA1..1, I's k`Il # OX !1?H:I 1'1.11. }-ti lrti-lV f ;tticinw :.it]wrrrtic trlrili4 intp:rct �wI% in ;he c(mtc%i W -Lvhi, then t1k project %VOUIJ fkrl'k' 0.r-746VICAlIeUd MiVer.1W ofkc.P an ,,uh€ h eriflr I'F� App€ic rtll cluirxts. "I ht: €'tt,pitis .cl lJT1 4a`t Wcrulti alcxt afTecL ptlbrit° ha th in arty 1k;W' stE+r`rr WaWr X801.111 hi jpprt}pilwJt d6posed of in i rairl gc :wvctures, Ttallic impacts have lwvii Liken mum L;aie:lul t: ertt:jcle:i•atiutt in VUU.Ject day iNrr." Lil,lalzu ib aad dvt;• Tha.� bald cmnclusitill c uvr AAL Adruss putl:tt!i it advvysr illip tcts 1!; r'L2(11.111-ed by �'];_1L;rc� 11 -2(10.€ - € lig wkii eWministrativ kkfle , h. The V]am-ming Deparitiim s1 uld wt "cepi tl:c , I i 'qle•l1,N `+I f"'�SSl:;ti';ti1f;�l I's reliance on fl-ae SSI M r r� ffic Itvpael Ajia1%_•, f��}z.r� ��Iii,ir ;pis the f iLI dctiei%;n6 s: IAlLire to ciddress advevw traili Impacts within the Kctr}a 4listta� sa�lxlitiisittn .trl!�}1Ig 1r:Itrr (lie P}wect. t). The ASF V Traffitc Inmprda�! Arialysis RCrOrt L1,CA u growth rate c}1 1 �`n. m contras] to the 2',, grnwth rate Lmipioved h) tl}e 21118 W itchr:i Engiitixring TTA to Impact r" iMI.Y�sis l q)vrl, Iraflic c,m,,L:s6vn is ven, scit,,itiwe u, grog vlh raic in a non-lrtwar, exp onenriA rtilr}11011: k:- I Fac SSIN I Cl1-dic rlt}p;ac:t-Ntlsal)sis Reptkrt does not recognize rniiII i-t2cncrrlar}t naI 111:►utiita t It:4r:tttrteri4tioo eunlIrii7rt i}} 1 a"'aii t t:(irding tt, `'wt:St}a +.Il ttt tared liLd� :ira&resihnat ,, ;bily Whicle lrip� attribtttnhlc to bi}ilt,atat a�l'tlYc FrnTrrl cel �irt�jt ct. :i. I'hC SSI `M FTAPiC 1111paCT knaly w'� Perxxrt rmph)ys an i1tlu�11ally k0l, vci7i::ic IF M : �vfdcics fru Northbound t,)irct:n l�.titlhaltta�[r111 lt}ttrl��st�' on ll}c. sc:lcctc�cl darca cit kpril C. 701€ Q. a vweekOny and AtigList 24, 201 . c 5milrcf.y.. co npnred wilh the 2018 Witcher Fmrineorin�F I-radiic Impact Anak-Kis lterm« v,-hrc!i r,pr ncd I0 -ti vehietcs tt-)r.laniiiam 14 nne.1 15, 2016, both Lvoekdav,_ _ the unt}sttally lkiw repr,rtod vLhe•214 r ; Liniz L)t S5.3 is niiD aT Mdr, with igure 4 (A rhe SS1-M r ra;ilic lmpaet :Lrudysis Report. waich shows approximately 1050 vehides per hoiir in 201 r, for Northbound Oueen Kaahiiinanu. Highway at 7 a.rn. l he difference in Volume, is rncir� thtrri ilcruhle tN,, !i?ixitliuiti 10116) variation geedally u4:o:p,.W }t1 rneasurcmenis -and thus unreliahle; k:. Tho recfvm. ttendation b~ 1tiSYNI I racffic Impact Arutlysis RcT�nr# t;)7 a N-�LindaKwt at Quven Kmdiamwtw F1igh"ay and Hualalai Rt,ad C%urt.hl is inconsistent. with the craffix -':gin,13or. lmi:r�iMjorm Ilan 1wis, �Aimumi hul rcma[n L1n:;1'1Z11iZed ffesCrif truffiC ;�I fs I :al lliir' LkWL, rnr for the p;rovorrrmcm: f The Tc::c)nu11cnja"i.vT1 he' SSTNI I'r.Ifai1 lmpaL•r All alv�;ic, Rep ;o for fflcmiurr l)Ly , w the 1nier-wc(ion ol'Quccl) K=hujuanu I ligliway anti KuAini [lijhvvay i; ill adequulu W he re.L; hcr',", an mi rsLcctli',rl 176i,w�L+ Ci7w. w tit,.ln Bile Nwurrum Rinner till conditions. H should he rrl(in'fi7e l ['or siud? and doiwn of ;s [LTl;]l To I ;11." all-,31io . phis c•irr<:umslaaLt will b,� exa�:erhmctl by the prol'Xiscd 17. IItsua11. 1h,; 014iI;I-II•.iroiinu-)Ial Ass es��rncnI and SSI -AI I rai'iic Impain Analy,"iS Renorl Mlle: 1101 �,A]1-1,;cl 1, tira`djblt 1L;: 1i, :111+1 .151;11'. ', arch that th. advvorre 11t]11 i� tsruji ructure ,md 1'"11ltirlr ICLA11 irlU5.awd lraffll i:J11 b-' tLAk u.ade°rstood and result in approIl j [;. v gl��,ert11115.w lll'cltlning and response. I dc. - ire uadel lyt xallt of perjur that the (aTi-,going IS True i 11 1 Fwailuu- t}ett,tw 1, 202M 4i 1t14 r5 , '._�. ,�. September 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsufFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek f$QS) 494.2039 Ms. $a�bara RRepasky 76-152 Kameharnalu Street Kailuca Kona, HI 1?6740 via email: wayne.hernby@gmail.com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns lin the Draft EnAronmentol Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawat'i Island Dear Ms. Repasky: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 5. 2020. on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive cornrnenfs. Comment 1: 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I arm specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 2: In 'he Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa. Place. Kekuanc3o a Place is very steep, has Rim[ted sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koohumanu Highway. I cm particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congesfian to residents along Kekuanaoo Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuana'oa Place is a County -owned road built to County sla-dards, with the same specifications as all other Kona Vistas roads, including pave] wvales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic [rnpact on Kekucana'oa Place tram Pc;yal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekucana'oo Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -cut is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuona'oa Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oo Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Q� September 13, 2021 Ms, Barbara Repasky Poc ge2ofA .Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response 3: Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected Since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7,1 of the EA. Racgc:rding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana`oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the A -M and P peak hours, respecfivel �. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, 'The Proposed Project would not offeot public health in any way, sformwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impracls as required by Chapter 1 1,210,1-1, Hawaii Administrative Rules, Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5; Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed crid analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment 5: The Planning Department should not accept the DEM reliance carr the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivislon arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 6: The fIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering. Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exporentiol relation. Response f Hc%vaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show an fncrease in traffic volume, The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to dame rap with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used 1 % from the 2025 LRTP forecast, Q� September 13, 2021 Page. L Comment 7: The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics con--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips cattrlbutable to buildout of the proposed project. Response -l: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people With four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Tronsportafion Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and law -rise cnd mid -rise was considered. Law -rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very low standard deviation and on R- squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of B53 vehicles for Northbound Queen Koahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repol 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at adds with f=igure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the r-naxirnum 10% variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable, Response $- The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahumanu Highway section between plant Kailuo Road and Hualalai Road (north). Cour traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDQT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAL is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR fcr a roundabout at Queen Kcalhumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring cif the intersection of Queen Koahumarui Highway and Kuakirii Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design at a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project, Response 9: The Manual can Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states, 'The sofisfacfion cf a traffic signal warrant of worrGants shall not in itself require the installation of ca traffic control signal.'' There are ether considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, soon as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geornetric feasibility, and Gathers. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where September 13, 2021 Ms, Barbara Repasky P e.4of4 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signcl warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact rrtie at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely„ Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre stantec.corr� ce: Richard Wheelock, Konya Three LLC M aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From Calet} I:ekoa. Nazara A:krazaraQprpt onmai[corn � Sem_ Wednesday, October 07, 2020 10.00 AM To: Planning Internet Mail 5u ject: Kana Vistas housing project EA - Aloha Tbk is first to Inform you t]iat my naiiie l% ms meiillonvd ati 13:.4'111. SOLI ht C01115tlltattnn HIAVC11OW1311CCtiton of tec.eivtng any docuntlm t seeklm', consultaticin, and �'arely have not wken with anywic on any concultatlirn. M Atal{I Catch Kekon Nazari!-1'vAl ketia Kisma ] tit:u'at an Ovic Club '-int from Prnton%4.911 Mnh-lle 1.1666 02. September 13, 2021 S-tantec ConsutFing Servkes Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tek J808) 494.2039 Mr. Caleb Kekoo Nazara-Peleki�er:a Via ernoil: knazaro pratonmoil.cam RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FOMSI for Royal Vistas Mousing Project, North Kona District, Hawal"i Island Dear Mr_ Nazaro-Pelekikena: Thank you for the comment letter dated 0,1 -'toter 7, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment [DEA) for the proposed protect stating that you had not been contacted for consultation. We apologize for any confusion, but attached please find attached an email chain between our cultural consultant (Mr, Glenn Escott) and yourself confirming communication, contact, and request for consultation during the Cultural lmpact Assessment (CIA) process for this EA. If you have any additional comments or questions abcut the EA, please contact me at (8084 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely,. Stantec Consulting Services Inc. I Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@siontec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, lona Three LLC Mai a Jackson, County of Ha oi'i Planning Department KAL) i Nvara , Lmiaaararr--mail.coin "fo.C,bmn fl,COt1 WM. Fch 19 al lil •15 AM 'wl AM KN-jul Wi11 do, 11v the tivati l did find one adier catitwi I'ar rites deal and W.itiR project. I've bzen ss bkl-- v 11w en"t had a chane% To call him tul 1 will this week and ge bawls to you thanks Nvu firrAii nn, iPha-liv 011 Ceb i ia, X1120. ai 12:21,4 11M. (Term 1-1�+itl � �,i�tl aYwr�liu*�;rw�i a tvruh Al Obit r hci u& �1a63l4-j forhill � CM the 111.L'l4 ka)iin pir.,lc i drw in kalaoa 5th Ah s 11 trja gmid to 131 Star%- %hath you and Ictkc. T1'la nN L,4ijWiwi mg aj ibther CIA in Holualkm i1"You are intorestvd in cor illiiig un 6,ulli=l rirn-aicv,~E ttl ih;a pwj vi ares kmdi•. I'lc. ti %tie the anulwd CIA aortturtatidn rexlttt+rt fair lan& If I10]Ualda IstL Norlh Rolm rlf V..W rr %Mji� V011 kpi,m h.is inibn%nutimi rrgardin,g pim nrongoing cishnral prulict% in Ilolimloa lel vont wl rnh:Itr :onaclt. \Iah,tho Noi I.AK�, Uh:nn. U. E icaLt. SIA Ls -ni(w ; ivhuenl.)gi%f KCientific 1..011SUILMI ;Services. Tnw. Pf)R'1l19-W)fA Mori, Ashl From: r1abaVeF1tUFeS(&-y4hOO COM Soffit, Wednesday, October 07. 2020 5:17 PM To- P4irinir Internet Mail CE: Yee. Michael Subject: Royal Vistas Hu0siliq ProjieclL EA Cornnvnts, Attwbffwnts-. Planning Dept Submission Roy -al VRstas 10-7 20.pdf th(-A Plewe t�'L� " �L( , C1;— - " , I ".!C 1 Vi the Draft EA me - Oa % f 1ti-i' , ,-:W I d qj*, I J'fil.' 1110'-1 (,e:. -1-lor- fOly Arc dkr,:!1.A1y L. rina: 7h,inl� 1,-.r Jt �p ii,)lj(y tLi ijt,,.,gra: 1pu Reree lnobu A1-TACI--iMENr,,F'DF [)oci,iieii0cr, stinmrs-sArr, 1.16664 �;UB,M1SSjo1,,ktl lei-�f 1�il:til lfl 1-.S'I1(NS 10111AWA1'1C'4)i{` !' "I'l.r'tilklll4lCi 1)F.l"POPE\ Pl'13i.1C'COM",11:x.I AND QUIE.STIONPERIOD DUF 1{lr�'U211_ RE: ROYAL VISTAS I](JLJ5M6 FROJECT DIRAFF F.A 1, Rene: L. Inaba, declare: I. 1 ani ai residcrit ofltailua ]Cana. Cckinly of 1Iawai-i, Slow orHawati'i. -Che 1)r,F1I "-.,:d Iatt4! (k�AF[)II)',LlI project tlial is the quhject Ljf the perding DrLift E nv i run men t a I Asscs:;aant subntit lect by R y"sI Vistas I lowing Prcj act Tax Map Key Nos. 131 7-()-1Q 1 OA 7-6- 02 j 017. 7-0-021111 N, and 7-6-417- 1:1.6141 North. Kova L)istriit. I Iawni" i Island. S(atc eel I ;111&1 :1 -iv :itiiriily. Itik aid lite: personally as well as affect.,; my inLerest in wal pronLLrty. I reside wiPtin ii, l will-L-� of thL- pr=,; oned land developnicttt pr€3Tw. In such capachi es, I have fiir�thoTid ktlwx -.Ld-r )1 111e: ft)lIowing fa;ta anti could and PUId tLil,' dicrck, if�;slIex upon to du ski. _ 1 hatvL rt vicwod Lhe pending DRAFT l"NVIRON MEN I AL. ASS1`SSMENT and anachmcnts. I am spxificaliy corleumed at> uC the carnpleteness, ccuta;;y, attd adcquacy of the: Inkirmstion pivvWtrd- 3. %RC'H EOLi1CjIC7 .L HISTORIC"AL'C ULTL)RAL AND THOSE CONSULTED. It is. nm clear 1hat the: archacok)�,gicd] ,lucks offered in support of the Draft EnvirmTriumal As-&-sattten( art: fully complctc or adequate. A.) Sample size and evrnpletuness: rthcr` :tre a number of features of archaeo[LIQLA1, ltisrnrical asci CUItural Agn.if-ivance that are not documented inasmuch as the document has addressud only a small sample of the land and I'esatures as opposed Ho a full study far purpos of: Identification, loggingicataloging. and Page 1 cf 7 tttmorialixaticrn tA k—ev fe,jtuivs of eoncern tea loc.tl Hawaiian. kama'aino.. and stakehuld'r 1xvu[anons, tai C'misalt:ttians Suut!hi and Acmd ()iTTliut.'t'ommL;nv-, 'I'li ie else also qucs iow that need to by hotter diuiw,Gjv l about xN•h.jl cOI-Stitntc= see Page 42. as notal quas'jt�j (Wom the SCS CIA 16r the Pmjcct- 11 is not c car what i4orrnirtion was provicdcd and if the pm-les drat wei-e Iisted, as asked. had akddi6oml queriQs that still stand unans-werca.i wid not &closed in ihi5 document- Th;,. iltttCrt Cnj as shown tt>igltt implv or :,ivo. an iinprL;sion o Mcclpla ce, 5greemmi orconcurrcric;c by thvNe puFtics w►•hvtt it Is not clLw.ir thni has occumcd, i,e ua the ahwencr ol'aillirrv>am c AuLenictiN by these individtiails anal related consthum ies. That said, a marc cvrnplcti: uiidcrstanditi� r,['!he itmtire nI'the ingmw v, casual or signilicaitt, would be ItelpFul riff %veli ast10 uinunLatior f"rnati the pariiA�s listed msvniFig, their euro "i lwsitions, anAror cduesuon'.. ("R.1LrHJRAI, AN1) 0111ER FCATURES ,%PPEAR N(-TF:lllyl_,Y DO,U(.',1rtFN'1' m OR 4 I sNI-1) (.1[LPOSSIBLY %115-- [DENT I 1'1F1)_1-RO 14 THE. C't,;l.TURAL L.A'til}5C',AIIE. A) Substulitial eci&, e e,-asis lb -t the [anti cncompussed by d -w suhjeci land parcels inclLide a culturally sil-�'tiliIIC; flit I ILtlua thgatic Slide, and tock walls that are. inadequately dewribed as agricultural walls in the ardiaeolsi-ieal mudies oficrW in suppoa of tltc Di a[I Envirdtiiuncival Assessment- 'That its a sigmiivant c:limiruwe and clearly itnportam to understand much better t-►etore any equipment is even L~Lwiid red to roll. The Holm Slide is an important 11awailan culturil and archaertlouiuA feature from lire-Westem contact timu.w Ih;al cannot he rcplaciw-d i_fdamaged or &5trcw'ed. 13) Concern; cxpress+Ld are ba l u[xin the e1 uluratinn and analysis performed by Toru Pohak-u Stone, who ht" much personal irtibmation abr,xrt ihi-, particular land and the importancu of Holme,,. and who has shut -L- i ihat. information with local community mL.76L:n. Was Mr. Stone consulted about his concems,, knuwledvt and Page 2 of 7 info ntation? Cl l_cteaI historians from the iconic. 2w-year-told. historic Mokuaikaua Church. including Yolanda Olsnn aiui th- laCc Ro:,a rm,: Ciscn. have been regearching this €arca I[and para°ls as descnhcO i Iw'. Ila, c Lit ��,uti�L-11 sinkage to the culnrrstll r si nilscant paths and sacrtA butlrliai-- rnotmak hrnteghl clown from the txrauka Fbi-csts presLLmtdd O-Lrough this land, its paths. holua, eW by the early pmt-rtintarct llawnh,, is in the building of the iconic Lona landmark Nlokuaikarrs Church.. Was Ms. Olson c:t nsulted top Lhis slu,ly' D 1 Were rhe Oultural stewards and varclakers c,frhe Kealaknw'a"tt I IO,rtr ;51, �%k:II it IrL cultural IcadCrs of (Mla ClutdoKirOre le notifled ol'tl'iis ,Lvc►rk and pnolwised devolalprller7t? Given the co;i ncction ol'the IIeiau to the fund as outlined in the Draft E.k well a, its position d'liv tly tielow the properly they would also b key smkchoidcrs is the-s,i� haul issues and any alterntions- PTV- and 1, F.�-�:tirlits+�t rrr alk[ kalw were tainsported r, kvereatly through these I:incl4 Icy Leal akowa%i, thought to he kfi l{tst rt matittin cartw buitding heiatr in the State of I lawai'i and tlirvetly comet utett to Haase upslorie parc cis and the slide. MiaieriaK. presumed it) hm,c included titrtbcrs. caiu-. [gulps. mid other si nirwant products and imtyns nocduel i'`rrr wauka-niAai pruvisiunirr- .t.la iso the I Fm',z pa?lh throuph the prop€m and elms ahupua`:r, would Lravel further makai. The inti& level land; w. !,—c vary crill al for life and food prc►vi�ioniilig as these parcel* were the lir- nt lire pc;vlc mid lwmc to the Karia. field Sy tcm. Timbers tltat tiow support our most lcnnic. landmark huildings in Kona (k4lt k—uaikaua and the Palace) are thatr61ltit to have tra-veled this roule before [.Hing droppal in the ocean's salty. curing; water., and tltiratcd tip to the l wilding sites. ThLse lands are presutmA linked to acct only thtrse lxthL-contact ic:ork5 but to the pre-contact and now sadly rare canoe hieiau of Kealakwwar'a Heiau as *vt?l1 as opther relevant sitcs largely loses dtw to past development. E) Fere Boreal rlescendantq with ancestral claims -Lv Lhc Land and thu bomeS'iwi I~ttlly aff6rded information and notifcatroW h was notud in thc: stud; that paper media wes used, but -givvin the Page 3 of 7 importance of land issues here in I lawai'i and recent iss=-s with Matuna Kea. it would seeiin out of'an aiundanceertransparciKy and Actrontc: notification would also he necessary if the idea is to actually pr vide Icrl I awaar cess and notification. Were ntlhcr methods uscd but not noted fully in the report: 5,. Fnidan arcdp.G. tgs 5tut4t�;s at1t1 r"lSs`s3tllettt5 Agirear lnawamp s:Lc Arlc Mus -timed. Assclrto d ;tai wic' of ltigla watltle tc+ 1-01 Ia0 Pk1'j'atL0r1 and the island are presern on th", , lands. It was now d iii thi: Audy thslt tltcre w 3s an aw.:Cv4'nl ,sa cyl this but it also wwim nolod that stud cs, such as fir th4: Enda7ngeretl l tnary Bats, were not Wndttctetl at a tithe whun they are aCLivv:. This. additiorial siukIiL�s that cover the 11rncti ,il day assonct.l rare wW c ndaangered specie-, are active slwulcl he required, 'I ?-. • , , ,l :il ;1i t„ Ic i1 lc% -el ofL:oiLL:ern and care for the local and native 11nra.ind I''mria that - I I or'' !"- 1 1 i::,. -.-1. f Griti,"11 ilu,i' ihL report appears to ack-nawvlcdgc the c;om-srn laid i*staL!5 we ith Such Species 11 kc Iti,rling the I hiry Nis, is thea a plan to bc; er evaluate all the dative. ram. and end;angerNl species prosent on the palrzels? Is (lic;ic:.a j) 1.11, lu afaicluct a 'AllI and complete snidy of the pop,«ulanon of Hoary Bats during a sufl cion period oft,tm inelustv'e o tho rip lit time o F da% to ruiiy' assess & impact cel any dcvelopinew i nl any eruiang,ered Specie.0 5- Ernv'rangentail, SaNLY. 'T-ra111�-:, aaL'1110}4_S, Watr~r Slwds A) Si >iilic;aiit is,ues hawk arisen =iund our island when dcw,elopnical or grourid tli -sruptttrn is jolle tiw-tthoul full aA'auPs CSS Or Pt'upr:r mitigat.ican 01'11W future ml ertie effects. These beenme 1xiih txrytlw° diir lllc Cautftty and dangerous to the public at large. %V,- 1-im e nou.7d in NVewt Hawaii 1. Jimiusive- Vf iat xid aroLmd Kualkini Highway, rriakril of thiw aria, that slgnllsc= Ilooding lZ:is occurred c;,hm larger artd i[tttTmed[alitk le4,ek of prccipitation are grestmi, The iww o importantwaterways, alrr;arly noted li-c thL: Holualoa D[tc]L and Honeshlae Bend which CUITuntl-y rnartage water 4x:css arta flow Page 4 of 7 when prccipitation i5 huari ler, are effective cold hisluri� li"LL ti <<nd w.ttemheds. Was water 34)w mirm :t fully studied should any trltcradon of the [ nRlscape wid k11l k1e ock:ur aft€:r all �:ultural, archaeukq,real aTrd ercdartgci,Ld species issucs havc beeu rescAlvecl` The details Icxtik A zr bit light m the cicx;umcnl and this is a c.ria'Car1 concern. B) Has d-se C ouri.ty of Hawaii i devOcR d a pl an to deal with watertlow disruptions, ticwding. et,:. ancl�lor madc provisions for any developer, cryntrrrctar, err a erst to set aside k-Lnifcraront funds Lo ivIin4yr�e. tht~ County should devetop rnent udvcrsely inject adjacent, ul+slopu and (h) n,slrrpt:arcas 1hut end up darttagecl tsvoitx alterarirrrts nl prr-contact l o%v-q,, Drainage arul water 1143%v disruption-s awed to I:je handled rwA a l'tr11 and compIcte environrrtcntul assessment. C) The Ti-a lic Study. as 110ted in the I)i-Ift FA irrelusling the rvlxrrl lwy SSFN1 ittlrr-r-nationnl dated 7.1202) dons not seem sulftcienI to di; ;rl with 111 of ,Oa 11 and sig;ttikan! levels o'tranic ern any of otir swondmy and residtirjticrt s re+:tw unci rtua&a The' coninient addressiisg that "Fraffic: irnpnct4 have hcen taken into cawful consideration—" is riut suftiCient tr►allCviate VAILl Omcerns flim �xill hL held hythe public. Tltcrsecuncerns include signitocant cxe u a113 11,1/ArLtOU,, I.ra lic; corjd3tt'c[i,, Halving lreert as naive itXewber of accr County Trrrl is imiup acs wall a-4 flot our cunui2unity Here in Pualanr IMates, we have f€ wid 'normal'. non-C'ovid time traffic try be increasingly risky and dangerous rpn all Er ' our ;xtrc e( w ithin Baur community and also in the surrounding area. Any increase in fropulalion ur tlr„rtsi(y rar access through neighborl` cods already serving relatively large populations pose-s credible ri,,A that should not hes ignored. It was already a stalcd %-Drtcern in assorted forums specifically, related to vur roadways in and aruLnd Pualwr Lstauz, i,c.. thal sonic grade and curvawre issues pose signiftcattl and life-Lhr-:aterrirg; r-[A,, that we Dave identified over the past marry years. Please he very conscious cif lh %erg ,ignifcanl safety and infrawtructu-re ccn;xTtts. It %koulcl bti prudent of the Caunty tR) rcqurrc any dcvc1opc,, as in this case or tuty otb.-r large acral` )roposal. rc, et Page 5 of 7 aside signift"m esc,ruw or bond h[nds with the County to rerntmerate for lossesduo. to environmental disruption, property devaluatiorL loss of usc; and in the casc of intrastrtrcturc strain additional costs that might otherwise tall on the County or the people of the County of I-law•ai'i. Issues Celt for future remediation and remedy rarely work; out .k -ell for the citixcla takchA&rs or ftrr the CroSfcrnalciraI AUth;l city. It is list t(1 have adequatc and suMtantial provislous SQL ltt pldoc Itl 1110 dvvcloVp:, AdcqLKIICI}, 11KR!L: PTON ,.SII 111', (0 11 AIIA4H alsty I11 � t art),untl tAktitIg 4"t.tn7IAWlIlJL`ti U11d rtlad4 k;IVS to 4 s! urk iiti i`; IAr'"'4t:r11 1111"' on ilrir streets rliul irll'r'ltitrri4ILirO Has tIicdeveli+ptr it:[ asidc sultl,:Iei7t furids itt Coanty ai:wuats io settle ally issuc, ;aIld li.lhilitiQN d1M I:OUld result in d IWOUIN CS.CQlitcal Of ilt,sLlt%[Unte[y c0111pletcd Itlatl that stralrts an t;i�l,: r,,ul [F;tgi]i k%:I :t� nl � ter inirs;Irl�t;r.:c:: ia;r1!c:rt,�as' It 4lrres nn# at"ear that th«c were sulNeienily dacumcnied in the, repnri but might v a-iti+: ipate additional inforrnatinn and thought on funding the County for t hm significant cysts, risks, liahllitit:s in the Final Version'' G. In stunmary, Lie Draft Envimninienl. i As"-ssnicnt docs not ciiscu:,� u]fiCtt.•nt faas and analysis concenung intlxatiant Hawari:t,t Cultural and iirchaeulogical features. Illii it Cully addrJ-:ti w-atertlaw cone-erlts, infrastftt4ture issues, trailk. euviJrorrn-elital and rclattd futury costs and liability tD thG County We need to be aisurec] rll;rt rs]I slt�]rs :Ire Billy vcttiwd acid undcrstoW to avoid cosily and dang.crous future isst_elys_We alsn need to try to lrx)l: witll a vision to pr serve and protect our rt acc. safety and lands and frankly those things once gone that can never he restored At a rninflnum, ilic Drat't k-rnvironraental Assessment 1111.1811 tie J`eA'Lscd to adriross OIQ lucution, data r�nL!r- and preserk,:vLvn 11olua tSli€o and rclatcd artifacts and lineal ancestry on tlak: parcels. All infra.Iructurc conLi-ans wed ttr he fully Page 6 of 7 addrt-;svd with pubic, in person meetings. i.e.. not Covid It-w-kdoun limited panicipation or ability to speak. Our kupuna and community population will both wam and need to share their is+iutitr�z>anu'�s ani r levant convems hLtctrc_ anything. !s stdrtc.d SpmIcs pro[ection alcmg with historical preservation meal to be clone in cru'riam and the kcy' is4tres o6saEety. Nat: t, find mainlaining the aloha of the land and its cuffcnt llmv riLvd Lit) he held as a priority of avoid issues similar to those we have seen on n1lter parts of the island. In all things optmncss anti trantiparencyand work -Ing toward a positive rums -c., Fully resp,c ,rig our past and those that c,-im hCI'0 w. LN will hAd uti all in Vivid stcicl. "nccyc are nny thougIht ml question for you, Lite rticnil,ers of the Planning [`.nrntniSSion tO r4Aay back W tire: dv% Trp, r ; s you 4cl the entirely (if lhcir przipkvals and their report acid declarations. l ripl)r,:L LL(,� Ilse til-'PurrUILity LO VAc:c 4s�nsr , ru,, ctm,% rwr , :!r.tl on tNs rswucs of great impLtrtance for ovi island 1111d (01 KVIIu. Dated: Kadwa-Kona, Hawaii, C]ctcrbci ' 020 Frmi[Ld num! Renee L_ Inaha Page 7 of 7 September 13, 2021 S,tantec ConsufFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 96721 Tek {808) 494.2039 Ms. Renee Inaba Via email: incb av---ntures "'yahoo.corn RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawrai'i Island Dear Ms. Inaba: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 7, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment {DE.A� for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: It is not clear that the archaeological studies offered in support of the Draft Environmental Assessment are fully complete or adequate. There are a number of features of archaeological, historical and cultural significance that are not documented. Response 1: As described in Section 3.6 of the EA and included in Appendix 5, two AISs were prepared. As part of the AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evolucted for their significance. The AlSs were conducted fallowing Hawaii administrative Mules § 13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sites were considered significant render criterion d because of the information that was learned daring the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs ensures that their information is not lost. The documentation done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. Comment �: There are also questions that need to be better answered about what constitutes "comultation was sought", see Page 42, as noted quoted from the SCS CIA for the Project. It is not clear what information was provided and if the parties that were listed, as tasked, had additional queries that still stand unanswered and not disclosed in this document. Response 2: The information regarding cultural consultations is included in the Cultural Impact Assessment including methodology in Appendix 4 of the EA. Comment 3: Substantial evidence exists that the land encompassec by the subject land parcels include ca culturally significant Holua/Historic Slide. and rock walls that are inadequately described as agricultural walls in the archaeological studies offered in support of the Draft Environmental Assessment. Septomber 13, 2021 Ms, Renee Inaba Page 2 of w Response 3: Regarding the rack walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 2421 1 j documented. This read is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of a h6lua. Also the walls were 1.0 meter in height and is similar in constructed to sim l+ar historic era rock walls constructed along historic -era roadsr property boundaries, gardens., and cattle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3. walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of a Land Commisslon Award (LCA) #36617. Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the same gulch. It is unlikely that this is a hoiva course since the parallel galls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a h6lua in the project site. Comment 4: Concerns expressed are based upon the evaluation and analysis performed by Tom Pohaku Stone, who has much personal information about this particular land and the importance of Holuo, and who has shared that information with local community members. VVas Mr. Mone consulted about his concerns, knowledge and informntlonV Was ,his. Olson consulted on this study? Were the cultural stewards and caretakers of the Kealakowa'a Heiau as well as the cultural leaders ofKona Outdoor Circle notified of this work and proposed developrnenf� VVere other methods used but not noted fully in the report? Response 4: In the email provided from Mr. Stone by other commenters, there is reference to "the portion of the haluo at the Holuo inn, [that] has rack walls on both sides" and refers to parallel walls within the proposed development area. possibly Site 31182 Feature 2 and Feature 3 walls which are LCA #3660 bcur,d,cry walls. 'Primarily, Mr. Stone's email responses provide accurate informoticn concerning the cultural importance at the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the near -coastal region between Kailuo to the north and Keauhou to the south. The remains of many of these complexes were first mapped by Henry Kekcahuna. Mfr. Stene correctly states the r €gious and social importance of he'ehdlua and its connection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures alone the coast and in the near coastal region. However, the complexes are located more than 1,0 km west of the project area and there are no remains of royal, sacred or sociopolitical complexes, or a hi5lua, within the project area. The existence of a holua within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Stone, As discussed above. there is no documented oral history, arChival docurnertation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a h6luc course existed within the project area. A list of those consulted for the project are included in Apperwc_l!x 4 of the 6A. The information regarding cultural consultations, including who was consulted, is included in the Cultural Impact Assessment including methodology in Appendix 4 of the EA. Septomber 13, 2021 Ms, Renee Inaba Page 3 of w Carnment 5: Endangered Species Studies and Assessments Appear Incomplete and !'his -Timed. It was noted in the study that there was an awareness of this but it also was noted that studies, such as for the Endangered Hoary Bats., were not conducted at a time when they care active. Thus, additional studies that cover the limes of day assorted rare and endangered species are acfive should be required. Response 5: The EA includes a description potential habitat for native species -'7rnc iding the hoary bat) in the existing ccnd[fions part of Sectior3 3.3.4. The :,i � gical survey acknowledges that just because a specres is not detected curing the survey does not preclude its presence. In fact, the biological survey stated that the hoary bat should be presumed to be present. The impact ciiscussion includes potential impacts to individuals and to habitat for native species (including those not direcily detected during the survey). The impact discussion including protection measures to eliminate potential impacts to native species (including ❑vifouano and bats) and their habitat in Section 3.3.4. Comment d: Given that the report appears to acknowledge the concern and issues -with such species including the Hoary Bats., is there a pion to better evaluate all the notive, rare, and endangered species present on the parcels Response A: Since the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat is vulnerable to disturb• -ince while roasting with its juveniles in the pupping season, the I (Section, 3.3.41 includes a protection measure for all potential habitat. '70 minimize impacts during construction, woody plants taller than 1.5 feef would not be removed or trimmed during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). Additionally, Ho aiian hoary bats forage for insects from as low as 3 feet to higher than 500 feet above the ground and can become entangled in barbed wire, if used for fencing. The Propased Project would not use barbed wire for fencing." So whether the species is detected or not, the applicant will adhere to this protection measure for the project. With these measures in place, the project would not result in impacts to bats. Comment 7. We have noted in West Hcawpi'i, inclusive of in and around Kuakini Highway, rnakai of this area, that significant flooding has occurred when larger and intermediate levels of precipitation are present. The two important waterways already noted are the Holualoa Ditch and Horseshoe Bend, which currently manage water excess and flow when precipitation is heavier, are effective old historic flows and watersheds. Was water flow Impact fully studied should any alteration of the landscape and hillside occur after all cultural, archaeological and endangered species issues have been resolved? Response is A new drainage study must be approved by the County prior to coni;-uction of any improvements for the Project, ensuring review and approval of proposed drainage improvements. As discussed in the EA, the project would not contribute or exacerbate the flooding issues. Per Section 27-20 of the Hawaii County Code, the project is not allowed to increase any run-off onto r:r'. v.,Np ,I.I ,...r'.9r ,. IF ..I September 13, 2021 Ms, Renee Inaba Page 4 of 5 neighboring properties, so there are no effects on any neighbors frorn project run-off including or) the County -awned parcels. Comment $. Has the County of Hawaii developed a plan to deal with waterflow disruptions, flooding, etc. and/or made provisions for any developer, contractor, or agent to set aside significant fronds to reimburse the County should development adversely impact adjacent, upslope and downslope areas that end up damaged from alterations of pre -contact flows Response : Section 1,2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the two County -owned parcels. It describes that on TMK (3) 7-6-21:19, "Infrastructure during Phase II of the Proposed Project includes installation of a culvert system across the ditch to extend Kekuanc'oa Street, which would then be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the Dona Community Develaprnent Plan (CDP) "Official Transportation Map." For T K (3) 7-6-21:18. the project includes infrastructure for channelizing a portion of this ditch and includes a road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the cenrector road required by Ordinance and the Kona CDP's "Official Tronsportotion Mop." Additionally, as described in Section 3.3.2, Kona Three would prepare a Drainage Plan to ensure that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by Department of Public Warks, and there would be no drainage interruptions. Comment 9: The Traffic Study, as mated in the IDEA does not seem sufficient to deal with the overall and significant levels cif traffic on any of our secondary and residential streets and roc clways. Response 9: Existing traffic impacts were accounted for in baseline conditions. Traffic counts that served as baselineconditions were taken pre-Covid and, therefore, could be considered a conservative estimate of impacts compared to current conditions. The TIAR I;Appendix 2) thoroughly analyzes traffic impacts from the project to relevant intersections at the project site and nearby intersections. Comment 10: Has the developer adequately made previsions to maintain safety in and around existing communities and roadways to assure safety, peace and quiet as is aresenf now on our streets and infrastructure? Response 10: The proposed project would be built using best practices currently in place in the State and County of Hawaii, as well as all applicable laws, regulations, and policies. Comment 11: In surnmcrry, the DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis corer -,r,,ming irr ic:rtc:nt Hawaiian cultural and archaeological features, nor does it fully address waterflow concerns, infrastructure issues, traffic, environmental and related future casts and liability to the County" Septomber 13" 2021 Ms, Prance Inaba Page 5 of w Response 11. These impacts and protection measures are discussed in the EA in Secilons 3.5 (Culturol Practices and Sites), 3.6 (Historic and Archaeological Resources), 3.3.2 (Water Qualify and Water Quantity), 1.2 (infrastructure), and 3.7.2 (Traffic). We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional cornments or questions about the EA, please contact rrtie at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. rnichele.lefebvrestantec.cam cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From: john trer'riett -1wb12GPgmail.com-= Sent: Wednesday. 0 ctober 07, 24201 10:59 Alts To: Plar.nirq Internet Mail subjeet: Royal Vistas HiDusing Project To whom it may concern, In regards to the proposed land development project that is the subject of the pending Graft Eraironmental Assessment submitted by Royal Vistas Housing Project Tax Map Key Nos, (3) 7-6- 021:016, 7-6-071;017, 7-6-021:015, and 7-6-U21:019 North Iona District, Hawaii island, State of Hawwai'i. I have found the Er}vironmental Assessment of this project inadequate. The Assessment shows great detail on a 5 acre portion of the properb/ that was performed in 2018, and a much lesser detail, as well as dated, assessment (lf the remaining 65 acres. Within thu property are very likely remnants of Kealakekovia'a road ( path of the canoe). Koa Trees were harvested above Hc)lualoa and bagged dawn to the Kealakekowa'a Heiau where the Kcia lags were carved and made ready, A portion of the actual path exists an the property of the Holua�oa Inn bed and breakfast hktp� .+v�owa .hr �J, l inn. r r i/rjlstory-of -the-hclela-slide/ . Most Holuas were used for sport, however this Holua was built for hauling Koa wood to the sea. One unique aspect of this Holua is Its parallel rack walls to help contain the Kra &� it was transported down the hrolua. In the Royal Vistas Assessment it shows these walls and how they were used for rattle in the late 1800s and early 190Os. in lh,e assessment core samples of the revealing kukui nut. The ancient Hawaiians used kukui nuts and ti leaves to help lubricate the holua for sliding the lags. Holualaa is translated to engllsh as "Long Slide". -,his is a serious omission in the asses` merit. It has been observed by me, Hawaiian Hawks, Hoary Bats, and Owls lige in the proposed development, The assessment only suggested that they could possibly, reside in the propogcd area, The traffic study miraculously claims that the traffic has gotten better than in their previous traffic study. The entire Kona population w uuld agree vvithout hesitation, that it has become mulch worse. To suggest that adding 1000 cars to this area won't really have much of an impact is wishful thinking. Lastly, I find it very unnerving that the owners of this land that Is currently zoned as muiti family have been using it as a cattle ranch allowing cows to trample historical sights. The majority of the cattle have been removed recently, but at least 2 caws are still vdithin the property. I think it slows a lack of respect For an owner to do as they please, Ag land for novo, and Multifamily, tomorrow. Laws do not allow for this, yet it appears KV3 doesn't want to play by the same rules as the rest of u5. Thank yDu for �or your time, Srcerely, John Bennett 11. 11360 September 13, 2021 S,tantec ConsufFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tek J808) 494.2039 Mr, Jahn Bennett Via email: jwb 12664gmail.com RE: Comment's on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSl for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawai'i Island Dear Nor. Bennett. - Thank you for the comment letter dated October 7, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive cornments. Comment is l have found the DEA of this project inadequate. It shows great detail on a 5 acre portion of the property that was performed in 2018, and a much lesser detail, as well as dated, assessment of the remaining 65 acres. Response 1: As described in Section 3.6 and in Appendix 5 (Archaeological Inventc: y Survey jAISj reports) of the EA, the entire project site hos been recently inventoried for archaeological resources. One inventory covered 76.1 acres and the other covered 5 acres, Section 3.6 includes o summary discussion of the findings for both surveys that cover the entire site, as well as a discussion of how potential impacts would be minimized. Comment 2: within the property are very likely remnonts of Kealakek<owca'a road ( path of the canoe). Most Holuas were used for sport, however this Holu❑ was built for hauling Koo woad to the sea. One unique aspect of this Holua is its parallel rock walls to help captain the K❑❑ as It was transported down the holuo. The DEA shows these walls and how they were used for cattle in the late 1800s and ecrly 1900s. This is c serious omission in the assessment. Response 2: Regarding the rock walls within the project site, there is a historic era road Site 24211 j documented, This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surtace is not smooth, as would be expected If the site were the remains of ca hdlua. Also, the walls were 1.0 meter in height and is similar in constructed to similar historic era rock walls constructed along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens, and cottle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, f=eatures 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and rortheastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of a Lind Commission Award (LCA) #3660. Addificanally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the same gulch_ It is unlikely that this is a hblua course since September 13, 2021 Mr. John Bennett Page. 2 of 3 the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a holua in the project site. omment 3: It has been observed by me, Hawailan Hawks, Hoary Bats, and Owls five in the proposed development. The assessment only suggested that they could possibly reside in the proposed area. Response 3: The EA includes a description potential habitat for native species (including the hoary bat) in the existing conditions part of Section 3.3.4. The biclogiccl survey acknowledges that just because a species is not detected during the survey does not preclude its presence. In fact, the biological survey stated that these species may occur in the project area, and the impact discussion includes pctent[al impacts to individuals and tc habitat for native species (including those not direciiy detected during the survey). The impact discussion including protection meosures to minimize these impacts to native species (including avifauana and bats) and their habitat in Section 3.3.4. mm rnf 4: The traffic study claims that the fraffic has gotten letter than in their previous traffic study. To suggest that adding 1000 cars to this area won't really have much: of on impact is wishful thinking. .Response 4: Section 3.7.2 and the Traffic Impact Assessment Report (TIAR) in ,\ppendix 2 of the EA include a discussion of current traffic conditions and analysis of predicted changes to traffic. The changes in level-nf-service from projected growth with and without the project condition in the analysis is Eased on the results of modeling by a professional traffic engineer, not wishful thinking. Comment 5:1 find it very unnerving that the owners of this land that is currently zoned as multi-fomlly have been using it as o cattle ranch allowing cows to tr(�mple historical sights. The majority of the cattle have been removed recently, but at least 2 cows are still within the property, Response 5: In response to neighboring community concerns, Kona Three LLC ceased cattle grazing in the proposed project site in 2019. To their best knowledge, Ilona. Three LLC knows of no cattle an the project site. However, it is possible that cattle grazing from the adjacent Comes` property temporarily moved to the project situ. September 13, 2021 Mr. Jahn Bennett Page. 3 of 3 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If your have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by ernall. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.❑. mich4ele.lefelovre stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashle Frorm Wayrtie Nemby <wayveH72e- hotrnad.com> Sent: Wednesday. October 07, 2020 3:29 PM To: Planning Internet Mail subject: royal Vistas HoLsing Rroiat EA tornriwnts Attach nts: LCS-deli io:d.pdf, Royal Vistas DEA Comments by Clyde Herrtby.pdf; SSFMI High Ir:jary Network SUM VuoB Zero Study 10 30 2a19 polf I have attached the Files vjhich contain may comments on the Royal Vistas Draft Envirorme!ntal Assessment and 3 support documents referenced in my comments. Please contact me if the 4MB size of the �517M Vision Zero study presents a problem or if any of the attachments arrive damaged or unreadable. The 55F M Vision Zero Study is large but that is their original files which I did riot watt to modify. All the fixes except the comment letter itself are available on the Internet and I can provide links. Mahalo, Clyde Hemby 1:166x):) FIGURE L LEVELOFSEMIUK (LOSO DEFINIHONN Lull Qf kmtg%A Fi4awlrjw tr-aft. vAlm widivAwl wsws Orivally Ljrid7fdFtd by JhO OFescrze of others ii, the trallic scream Lnul qj §Wirw D. 11,9K,49,islty flaw W. w4ch s;,ftmd and Ireedorn to trimeuvai are 5e'!WLI!y reS'ieje-j and comfol amo comwimiarce rave dftll"d even (hough r0 -N rnmlalMl; stabW LovW Qf Siffiry Oi St*,u wdliG flow Wil -I a I;Igh uwref, [)! rifsadc,rik l� jrwlrKt %pftd WId L1301AIW, UNKIRKN1b '-'UL WW' IWOOk WIVk poof lw*s a cixivcgtal�d - -, " '.., I-Aftal of Serviett C-- kimLnLiad OLr# 11 ' ri- - -;tdUe but 4h sigrifficonI rlln.r3cti"m VAIh j3ttEf... r ci— - rr" 31rLIdn' th7 Wu;al low. I rrf ro mjfrt a,,d CVII -eki E:,.. A. U. qot;coaty 71 lWi IRVw LKLW_qLjRrLTU.�E.. ICTLel' IFAC HOW Ir WhF,;' IhU alIOU01 of Lri@15C anproiaL�iir,- a p:j'li 13xc Bads thD armcui I -31 1:a.- 00 Serest LJ: I ty stcr}and-::r A -J,L�; pcc-r Vayel e, -res v, -C--Irrt and rcnven1c,-.e a -c �WAIMEA UArAlt"ime KAMLA KONArM CAPTAIN --"',Pzmr- wFLO IIAIIAIIU 4. HLLID KE)" m 14% Introduction and Conclusion- Ftvr ai vistas EAcomments In order to be efficient I have designed this document to convey the basic elements into two pages of reading. More deLdIn with headings is supplied but the reader r5 nut forced to scroll to the end for car,clr cions Those headings wlil be arrangecl in order of i nportance i`Oy name is Clyde Hemby and I lige in the Kana Vistas subdiwr sion about a half mile fir -um the proposed Royal Vistas project_ The Big Island is my home because it is mostly rural. It has some large hotels in appropriate tourist locations in Hllo, Kailua-Kass and U1Waikolaa. There are nes skyscr.glaers Full of apartments and hopefully never will be, because that would signal the end of the serenity ; i<l naturat beauty that is the treasure of Hawaii Island. Currently there are times when I can ham: - it ,.7 + ng winter surf mixed with the sound of a cow moving to the North along with the underk. nk.? ai, l ever-present soured of traffic that. seems to grow steadily worse, You can imagine my sorrow upon finding that Kona Thi ee lml-C, a real estate developerfram Honolulu, 15 proposing to build a high density 450 unit protect just to the North. While Kona needs affordable rind �amrly housing, this project is a hunch of duplex, 4 -plea and 6- plex clusters of two and three story 6oildings. It will resemble the "monster homes" which have plagued Oahu and caused outrage aiid dissatistaction within governing agencies to control them, It Is like building a Blockbuster video stare when we live in a digital age. It was evidently proposed in 1984 when Krona +vas a blank canvas with a single traffic light. in 2020 that is no longer true. That blank canvas has been transl`armed into a pant-by,numbvr, 5 painting with jusL a (ew unpainted parts, Thuse parts should be used to fiii the needs of the community and not some developer with drearrs of dollar signs for motive. The development is designed to Erse the least amount of materials„ the least amount of 'abor, and is a large urban project being Stuffed into a place with insufficient infrastrUCiUre tc support it. The schools are over capacitor and projected to be for at least five years. The flood control is insufficient and will be made much worse by this development. Pages 36 and 69 of the .pdf file jpages 23 and 56 of the DEA) acknowledge that no Certificate of Occupancy can be isstued without completion of drainage system Irt PYOVeMentSr sa why is a building permit every being considered? The curtent roadway is a rural two !ane rind, with wide shoulders to allow vehicles to yield to the frequent emergency vehicles, and is riot adequate far €ursent traffic. Under Hawaii County Code Chapter 25-2-46 (eJ Witigation required" there can be no occupation untilthe unacceptalAe traffic conditions described in page 63 of the DEA ase fixed. o Why would a building permit even l)e cunsidered? There will be a substantive traffic safety problem with more traffic congestiar} and more severe accidents if this development is Allowed before the roadway is improved. The proposed Royal[ Vistas Roadway, an tan -signalized intersection near the Lako Street and the Kuakini highway intersections with a left tura acrass traffic to en°er the development far southbound tra-fic will be disastrous considering most of it will be heavier anfF 5lower rommercial vehicles. W hili r is tempting to accept a development For the economic and property tax boost, the pro ric s -ed dev�I. c.ri : it of Royal Vistas as specitied will be hurtful to the ccrr munity in the long run. It will not fit in wlt� t;)e spirit of the community in the way it looks with clusters of multi -story buildings, especially tine three story building which should be prohibited. Itwill adversely affect three or more establishe€i nearby subdivisions. it Will not be substantially rheap er for buyers. Market vahie Will put the units out of reach of local families where the annual median household income is $65,682 according to a Sept 8, 2020 article entitled "The Pandemic -Driven Future Cf Affordalaie Humes in Narth Kona" an Civii beat. Honolulu. Most oaf the units will be sold to mainland investors or rented out by the Honolulu developer so money will not stay within the Hawaii island economy. It is even unclear if the project will use local labor or materials_ The developer would have you believe this is a simple "infill'° project but it fs sn poo0y planned that Lhey cannot complete the required roadways specified as requirernen7 s because they don't own all the property. Thur are also not infillirng with tike and cornparable pfaperties but nsist on toading the area with at least 450 units to utilize water commitments they may have purchased prematurely. By their own DEA "Alternative design teatUres were considered including wider access roads and staid -alone rather than clustered structures, but these features, Iirnited t`)e amount of green space available for the Project". That also drives the requirement for the three story 6 plea c°usters which is not desirable to anyone but the owner or developer and not on the wish list of rr,rt err:"ies, They have raised disgust and anger from the surrounding 5ulbdivision; which have endured kr ,i , ,-Ji construction and when `inally there scrams to be an encs, this developer conies along insisting; on using the roads of those subdiuisiclns as if they were unpopulated, Commuters from South of the project revile it as an additional obstacle to a difficult commute. Please consider that the best long term plan for this lanJ might lie to leave it undeveloped. It could be set aside or acquired as open space land and used for a purpose that has a light. footprint. Tlris Development might have keen useful in 1984, but like thy,- Ukackbjster Vidieo stare A should no longer tie crrnsidererd. I urge you to reject the DEA and the development because of the lack of infrastructure in the proposed location and because of incorrect or inadequate parts within the )SEA, winch I will highlight in the following pages. cei�` i°" Clyde Hemby 10,17/2020 lA Traffic Many pages cf the D A is devoted to a trafiit study (see Appendix 2 of the DEA fur this l raffle Impact Analysis Fiepnrt; fil ed with industry [argon and €iiagrarns which concludes the project will only make traffic a Iittlt vvor;e. TIle study also has some serious mistakes, some suspicious data gvest ions and lacks scope: • Page 125 of the QEA „pdf file (Page 9 orf TIAR) cites data counted an Thursday, August 24, 2019, which was a Saturday • Page 125 of the IDEA ,pdf file (Page 9 of TIAR) tells us data collection was on Tuesday, April 30, 2019 and 4 wg4ay, August 24, 2019 which are 116 days apart.'. Are they 'cherry picking" data because of unfavorable results? Why was this done? • The DEA is very inconsistent In reference to the very Important TIAR, referring to it as a Traffic Impact Assessment Depart in the table of contents and the cover page far Appendix 2 and a Traffic Impact Analysis Report elsewhere, With all the narrow scope and failure to address many important areas, this report actually is reduced to a Traffic Volurne Study. • Page 55 of the DEA.pdffile, numberedDEA Part I page 52 (Fkgure 9 -Proposed Improwmentsto Project Intersection with Queen Ka'ahumanu f is provided in very low resolution, making it difficultto see details to evaluate prub e -m, with turning lane capacity, refuge lams location and length, or dangers and conflicts with th:= Kuakini intersection This deserves a very serious look in order to plan for a signalized inter, tciiu! when Rand are added. Planning, approvals, and installation For a signalized installation can take over three years. Iinterssections that pass warrants but remain unsignaIized are a traffic safety Iiability for the agency in charge. • The TIAR ri ever examined traffic impact on Pualani Estates or Kona Vistas roads even as Phase II pians to use triebr streets. Tbey also omitted La'aloa Ave and Sea View Circle wvhich are signalized intersecticrts between lako Street and Kamehanieha ll] which were &L.:& -d loan( Kailua Drive was also left out. Had they hike included I believe they wou'd be found pruhletnatic. • The TIAR does not mention the new hliurnalu Marketplace at Henry Streit that will open in 2020. This 22 acre shopping ct nter with spaces for over 750 cars will have an impact on the Henry Street intersection, espec=ally wh ere the southbound two lanes quickly merge into a single lane at the Malu lana (toad traffic light which is al so not considered in the TIAR. l wouldn't be surprised to see gridlock in this area because I've already experienced it ashen the car waiting; capacity betweer Henry Street and Ma ..iIan i Iias been f`uil and the Henry Street southbound signal turns green and there"s nowhere to go_ The problem will h�e worse When the old Safeway is repurposed. ., The TIAR does not mention the approved Homelands' Villages of La'i'Opua 2OU unit project in Kealakehe- This would alter the results of the S year estimate at Makala Blvd., Palanr Road and Henry St. intersections. Safety and HtaIth concerns were never mentioned and should be an important part cif the evaluation. Mere traffic capacity is too narrow in scope_ SSFM, which produced the TIAR in Appendix 2 should be well aware of safety problems in the area because they Rtoducod a study and a set of crash maps of accidents from 2013-2017 for Visior 2erD and classified every intersection in the Royal Vistas TIAR to be part of a "High InjUry Netwotk" On Wednesday, Feb 20, 2019 the Hawaii County Council Transportation Cornmittee passed Resnluitlon Number 38- 19 to adopt the goals, strategies and policies of the Zeros Vision Task Force to prev eirit traffic - related fatalities and severe injuries in Hawaii Crju sty, by a vote of 8-1. Queen Kaahumartu highway south of Henry Street is not an urban roadway or freeway. It 'Es a two lane undivided road and One slow vehicle or accident can take it from free flowing tea stopped, This means inFrastructure must corse befo}re the project Starts building. It would be a disaster to have this prvject delay road improvements crtry to do both projects at the same time. The draft 0EA anriounc �� :n r ix ; es Kuakini Highway from Henry Street to Kdmehameha III Road wiII be widened by � travel Iaries (Page30) of the .pdf filei page 17 of the IDEA], page 68 of the .pdf file (lame 55 of tire DEA), page 133 of the .pdf file (Page 17 carthe TIAP), Page 148 cif the .pdffile (page! 32 of the TIAR), page 172 of the .pdf file (Page 56 of theTiAR) and page 1473 a` the .pdf file (page 57 of the TZAR)). Most of these references indicate inclusion of bicycle facilities and sidewalks but Wes-, H: %viii T;adavrepert5 in a September 29, 2020 article that dine to Covid- 19 5tate revenues are go•ie for rc,_ad rnp-overnents, which rely can rental car fees which Is dawn 65% and gas tax which Is also drastic illy short of projections. No Hawaii road projects will be approved for federal BUILD funds for 2020 which will make prioritization unlikely, The improvement will haveto be treated as new project instead of an improveinent because right- of-ways and property must be acquired, according to Freshman Senator Dru Kanuha (p -Kona) who was trying to get the project back into rnn�id,-ratio% as stated in a West Hawaii Today Newspaper article datt-d February 13, 21019.and titk,ti "Knna Traffic is a Nightmare The review committeewould be w e to consider the improvements wiil not happen in a tirriely manner and will Le much harder thin the recent widening project to the airport, which was ower budget and severely behind schedule. As a resident that has lived with the traffic near the prcpcsed project far years; I have tried to convey in layman's terms why the project will cause a substantive safety hazard and carlvrnce you further study is needed at best and at worst this project should be delayed or abandoned until rrutigatian under Hawaii County Conde Chapter 25-2-46 (e� is completed for the 5 LOS E&F deficiencies listed or pages 25-29 of the TIAR• The traffic study report has many references to Level Of Service or LDS, which is just a rating or a grade for the flow of traffic. LOS A is free flowing traffic and LOS F rs when traffic exceeds the capacity of the roadway and usually includes waves of stop and Cc traffic. I have included hiPure 1-1-0517efined which is a visual depiction of the different traffic levels. Many cif the state regulations, including Hawaii, accepts LDS 0 during peak hours as acceptable but YOU car see from Figure 1 that LOS C is where general level decline is noticeable, In Hawall with many lourisl�s on the road, it is Important that roadway speed he stable in ardor to prevent ac ciderits from distr&--Ltl:; rar inattentive drivers Lhal are next familiar with the roads. As a driver, t have personally seen the aftermath of rollover accidents at Laktx Street, P`uapuaanui Street, and Mani Kail ula Drive. I also have a neighbor that had a cherished vehicle totaled at one of the intersection in the study after being rear -eroded by a driver suspected of being distracted by her phone. Another friend had her SUV totaled and suffered hack and neck injury at a different intersection in the T1AR study. 4 The rtaacivuay 56!ChOn that is the key ua the xutaatantive safety ha2ard is ;state roast 19 between Henry Street and Kamehameha III. it is not .an iii -ban roadway, just a two lane unci}vided road with son -w turning lanes_ Some of this section of roadway has wide shoulder; which are used by scooters, joggers, bikers and allow traffic to yield to the frequent emergency 4ehirlF,>, The road from Lako Street to Kamehameha III has only inches of shoutder which is often obscured by vegetaticon. In rnany places there are guard rails or rock Malls. The only way vehicles can yield to the frequent errergerscy vehicles Is to turn ante side streets or into private property parking lots, dlriv rays, etc_ It is no wsOnder the )t an Octob-r 30, 7019 55FM International Study classi#iedthis entire section of road as part of a "High Injury Network' corridor. I will conclude the traffic comments with the following declarations which were professionally written: I am a resiclenr of Kona Vistas subdivkl on, C'owity of I-faNvai`i, State of Hawai'i. The proposed Iand development prR ject drat is Ilse subject of the pending Draft EavirorimenO Assessment subinitted by Royal Vistas Housing Project ,rax Map Key ltios. () 7-6-021:016, 7-6-0421:017, 7-6-021.018, anti 7- 6-021:019 Dior. h Kc na District. Hawaii bland. State of Ha wai'i affects cite personally as well as aiffecis cny iHR�T l',t it) real IWo13CM', T reside within half a mile of the proposed land development proji:ct, To such capacities. T ha,.,e lirsilland knm7 led2c of the fclli)rw,rnv- fiac ,, and COUIcl kind WOUld testify thereto if called upon to do so. 2. 1 have revi&wed the pending DRAFT ENV IROi<w MENTAL_ ASSESSMENT Including the Traffic Irnp-act Analysis Report by SSFM International. dated May 2020 and attached as Appendix 2 to the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. I arm specifically concerned about adverse traffic Impacts both within and without the Kora Vistas Subdivision that are Q0 fully yr accurately addressed in the SSFNI Traffic impact Analysis Report. Iraffrc and the S5FIM Traffic impact Analysis Resort are discussed in the body of the CRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT at pp. 48-55, 67 and 71. 3, In the Bona Vistas subditi ision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway- Kekuana`aa Place. Kekuana'oa Place is very steep, has limited sight A distances due to extreme curves and is riarrcrA &I ill tit) sidewalks. .I"he impaci of iTlCte Iced traffic arisiniz from Phase I and Phase 2 buildouts of the Royal Vistas Housing Project is inadequatelN addressed in the SSFM Tuaffic ImpactAnalysi, Report,,w]-tich fclecuses Inst+ead oil Impact% along Qviccn Kaah-amami Iiighlvay. I ani Rarticulady conccm d that addlnL! nunle OLM I-CIck trips to a ad hum a separate subdh kion will present dan�,e�r� and congestion to residents atony- KekUmia oa Place. l consider that the Planning Depanment ShOLtld require the appl l"m t address these ccxttce ms• 4, The DRAFT E's'�� 1RC N N -I f NTS' L ASSESS ENT requires evaluation Of, an -10"S others, ctelvetvLr Set:001LUT iWI)OLIN, VIJL h ir► I -'J M;0000 cJtcr���,►�.► (ff 1,ffiCf.% on 1wh1ic1cr01r~Iies . ee Chapter 11-200 1-1.3, Hawaii Administratiie ROM Instead of squnrely acldressin-- these issues, howaie er_ the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSNfF_NT simply ignores them. clairs71 _4 1-11a1 "NO Arlt erre sOCU dart' erfects are expected since thedevelopmem would utilize ,;Ail1 ILL, infrastruck"re. ide infill ltmlsing. and is not expecied to result in substamial a1e11u id, IL, Ucni]-. '1�'CC E'S .. It ]S it ' LCT ALIS 01111Y%J011 [Or the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL :15SrS�VF T to fail tkF address the potential ach er a hiipaQts of increasing the use of �L1l' ,Mr,• and exist11t4 irlfrt►structure, like Kekuana-oa PI ace 5. The DRAFT EN" RO-N- {iENTAL ,ASSESS'MEN—T addrmes ad -verse traffic impacts only in the cclnmem of whether the prcjeci would Have a _ti•frhstatrrial ache) -5e cJkc-r on +r111h/.(L rVairlx. The Applicant claims. 'The Proposed project would not affect pul-4ic health in any l4 ayl storm water would be appropriaLrly disposed e fin drainage stmctures_ Traffic 1117pxicas hav been L:iktn intocareful eful cwtt tde[;&on tll j.til•C]iect du.'.s�" " Emphasis added. This bald 6 conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter I 1-4c: 0,1-I 1, Hawaii Administrative Rules. 6. The P#arnnin8 Department should not accept the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESWENT's reliance on the 55FM Traffic Impact analysis Report, which has the following defivencivs: the project; failure to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from The 55FIM Traffic Impact Analysis Report uses a growth rate of 1%, In contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Traffic congestion is very ser sit [veto growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation; C. The SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics cornrncn in Hawaii according to census data and likely underesTirvates daily vehicle trips attributable to bulldout of the proposers project; d. l h(-- `} FIV lfvpact Analysis Report ernploysan unusually low vehicle uolurne of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahurnanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis. Report, which reported 10157 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2015, both weekdays. The unQ5uaIIv law reported vehicle volume of 853 is al5u at adds with Figure 4 of the 55FM Traffic Irnpact Analysis Report, which shows approximately 11150 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kaahumarnu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference In volur'ne is more than double the nnaximcm 105 vacation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus wwreliable; el The recommendation by 55FM Traffic Impact Analysis Report for a ToUndabDUt at Queen Kaahurrrapiu Highway and Hualalai (toad (North) is inconsistent with the traffic cotridca. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignaIired presenttraffic safety Iiabitity concurs fnr the gavernmentd F_ The recorximerldatton by 55FM Traffic Impact Analyses. Report for mgrnitoririg of the intersection of Queen Kaakhurnarru Highway and ltuakini highway is madequate, Where, as mere, an intersection passes Mare than Qne war -rant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will heexacerbated by the proposed project 7, In sum, the Draft Environmental Assessment and S5PM 'Traffic Impact Analysis Report does not present sufficient, credible fact-, and Analysis such that the adverse irnpactsori exist ng infrastructure end resulting frc ni increased traffic can be fully iiriderstond and result in appropriate Covernment plarrrtrrg and response, Mood Zones and Drainage II airy a resident of hoot suhdivisitm, County of Hawrai`i, Stale of Hawaii. The proposed land develc pt lent project that is the subject orthe pending Draft Enr°ironrnental A'}stf', Merit uhiiiiu-d by Royal Vistas Housin- YrojeLt Tax Map Key Nos. (3) 7-64)21:016, 7_6- 021.017, 7-6-021,019, and 7-6-021:019 North Kana District, Ejawai'i Isla -pd. State of Hawaii affects me Personally as well as affects my interest in real pr-operty. I reside within a half mile of the proposed land devcloptnent project, In sucli capacltrLs, 1 have firsthand knowledge of the F01Io4 InLt t'ar'ts and cotiId attd }'~rind testify tbereto ifcaII�,d i I lxltl to do so. M 1 l hme rew lew�,ed the pending DRAFT E'€ VIRONMEN 1 -AL ASSES SMEN l' and attachments, I wa specifically concerned about: Floods similar or worse than hose from 61; which damaged Iicmtes, exposed a critical water main and posed danger to niotorists cm Knalcini highway. 3. The steep topography, Ilistoirical rapid storm water run-off and assmiated damage pres:nt hazards that are nor adequately addresscd in the Draft EnviTonmetttal Assessment. See 1'1' 16 kaki 69 thereof. It is clearly understood by the developet that no certificate of occupancy is exl,ncwd 1c. 1.1c vsstjc-d mu l the complevon of ih, drainque impto enients ate comlliele& Until that trccti?".'ary and retluired infrastructure is in pl.lc: ]m huddiineyc-rinifs should he issned 4. I it al plige vl of the DEA in a coi'iLeptu;d driminu 111ustraies tllr} Ljirge Flood phiin that ww-•ill 1IL' ,life, !.'L' :Ind concentrated into a ditch that runs o 'er CIT tinder two of the sAd vision roods, With roofs slid pavcment prevciating any Fater absorption it will wonen Il�,���liit�� ti ie t�rr�c:eeiCs i9L�ti�r►ltill_ tti srnr,, the Draft Environmentai Assessnaeat does not &l cuss sut"fJeni Facts and a]laiVIW, wudh Ilrii 111t clr-.ji27:1L1j� impro emetitsimd diversions pan be understotid. A proper envirolmental aswssment cannot leave meaningful details to , ta]:cn care of in the future. As I understand it, such circtimstances WOUld lead to uNil{ Wful pr1+1'ecr seigmernzalIOil, annong outer error. 6. A bare ccmtc:luslon by the applicart or acceptlrtv� �trtth01"!LV that nrt-decl infrastructure will caniply with ti -O emment regoladons is iasufficient. At a minimum. ;_lie Draft Environnnental Assessment must be rcn-ised to shspecifically what infrastnicture improvellients ario requ]" to tic into the CauntVs drainage system and how tho4e 1111provemellIS will funCTI art 9 Birds The DEA Table 2 Bind Species Observed in the Project Site seems incomplete which is not Srtrprising if the field study only allocated an hour during daylight hours For bird observation. I have often heard the rooster from that direction and have observed Kalii pheasants Corning from the direction of the proposed project several times. In the past I have heard the shrill cry of hawks. and seem (birds scatter that didn't want to be lunch. Ne seen large wing -span owls swooping law at neght on the old trail. I canonly suspeci that they are also present in the nearby area of the p, v,pcsed project. I have also seen black birds that didn't look like common myna but I have no reason or expertise to thinkthey were endangered ,Dr extinct I--Iawaban crows. The study for this IAEA does however accept the responsibility to do a thwough and complete job and nct just speculate, especially whren rt carnes to endangered and migratory species. The review committee should reject this section M the DEA and require a proper and thorough study be made. I am Including a time stamped picture of a Kalij pheasant taken 5/5/2020 at the edge of the Calvary C©mrnunity Church property, Blacichura's Sphinx Math "r, + --Ate f.a to �Xv v ^ I have seen large moths resting in shady areas of our lanai and have always left them alone. They appear to be a match or similar to pictures of Internet irnages of Biackburn's Sphinx Moths_ In the /Future I will try to take a piWFure From a drstancv when I see one. 10 It seerns odd that an unrnunitured survey that at one point in OrTie dins riot Find evrdrrnct of the Black bum's Sphinx Moth would then allow the developer to destroy fcaod and habitat for -14e endangered species from that point in perpetuity for 70 acres_ The IDEA review corns-nittee should examine this approach carefully and verify it Is appropriate and suppnrtL-d by the governing agencies. Mitscellaiienus Inft`asi;, oatine While the lack of infr4Wruet+ure regarding: roads, traffic, ffoods and drainage has been ccvered there is a shortage of schaol infrastructure tc support such a lame medium density project, because the SCI -100I5 are already over capacity and expected to recoil n over opacity for five yearsor longer (See Appendtk I of i he DEA). That will make it hard ic, attrac! hi.nyers from other areasthat commute to yobs around Kona br:� have school age children. No solus an Is ofifned For this problem, On pjge 59 of the IDEA ,pdf file (page 46 of they DEA), a fictitious telephone and datan supplier has been specified as "Hawaiian Telephoneu Unans-vvered Questimis There are so many 2sp7rts of this project where no information is offered. -The D15A ReviewCommittee .should be ovary of what is niot .n the IAEA. Sonne of my ques ion5: • Will these units have phercvoltaic panels to help with the Hawaii initiativefor renewable energy? Thisshculd be +er.mired just as solar hot water is required. o Would any photovn!taic power be shared ■ With a single resident that wrauld own the system? w With the Building residents? ■ With the entire development residents? Will there he batteries at every build[ng in fire protected utility areas? • Fire Protect ori cin multi -unit clustersof huildings ,n Will there be2hour or, better firevialrstoprotect individualunits) * Will theTe be a shared attic space that will slaread hi -r~ danger? * Will there be sprinklpr systpms'� c, Will t! ,_r? be permanent 'ire l" o0 e5 and ° stirs fc.. 'ire department use? 0 Will f `10gUi:shers be provided by the rlpvploper for each floor? o Will carports or garage strrrrtLJres he attached to the living spaces? c, Could one bad turkey fry incident destroy a 6 -plea or cluster of units? + Access c, Will the units be ADA cornpilant? 11 D Will the units have ramps? c, Will the urzits Have elewitors? + Fees o Will there be a maintenance fee? c- Will there be a HDA fee or an HOA or just a martagem-ent company? a Will there be a fee for satellite dish iirrstallatitan. Landlords cannot loan satellite dishes Thank you for letting qty twice he hea-d on this very important issue. I a$so wish that everyone that gave me information ar had an opinion would comment, bit sadly they probably won't, For every camrnerrt you receive there may he a hundred that stay in the silent majority. If there are any equestions or if file attachments are damaged or missing, please contact me SrncereN, 14 CWe Hemby 10/T12Q2a Attachments: LOS Defined .pdf file ssrm October 30, 2019 reap at highest resolution available Ipgfile Vision Zero 5SFM Oct 30 2019 Study .pdf file 12 Hawaii Wand a Vision Zara Traffic Collision Data & Mapping Page ] 4cttaber 30, 2019 Hawaii Island Vision Zero Traffic Collision Data & Mappivi Traffic ("( Vision! Data Maps were preparers r-usiag the following data sourccs: • NHTSA Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). years 2013 through 2017: luta includes the specific locations of fatal mc,t xr vehicle tralTic collisions with pedestrians, bicvcles. ar ether motor vehicles. Dq,U1 i 11C!JAes de-M.Ographics of persons invcIved in the collision, trarksFurtation rriodt`S 1T1-1'0lVCd, chit and ]ti`nrc �,`'4.��lliis�+i;rn, and rx)tential causes of ltc. �(r1lr5tt n (tMt., tll4r � . ii ii��14�1 *I}w, .: i! itLS Clti Li t tiY 115e llISl47f3 fC � . • NHTSA National Ccuter fOr Stati�oics and ;%nalysiis (N CSA), years 21) 13 ihroug,h -1617: Avcragc percentzi�c sr1 trrll"i~:c Iclut4,l. I'wt tides within the state of] iawaii and rtttti{rlint ly, ass( jzriL�cl %vitlil speeti, 11L:ujtcl., imd ti:ric ni'day, * County of Hawaii Police Department, years 11014 tlirou gh 2018: Dut.a includes location, when provided, oflilt tjcn• i -rotor vehicle traffic collimuiis. NlRil ,r traffic collisions titre those in which the WILL l prolvily damn e (danulgt�s to rill imok, -I � L. IIxed ObJccts. animals, etc,) oil a l-mblic trafrcWny artsOLINS tO 1110re LhLilt'~ 1,000. 01' 011e in which a txaMC; CUIEsic►rr iI7ValveS irrjtlry or death. Details on thy: C tLrwi 09' [c trltw of the trallic, col Iision wcft:, not provided withih&daia Attintcs, locant 011:5 WCIrc Vclpt•t_'Sv[it 0d only by the rmid and nearest town in which the cOM.SiOn occur ted. vat!> lit) res ants - streel or rood 1,iile Post, T11CSC lilllitaturns irl the tltita, educ,- its ulility Isar dcrlclmininv Irlt 11-CriAsh lqn:a; ItIIIN;Ind identlf ViIII, rtilif.i.gation measures, flowever, it s iII lends ItseIrto 'rn ar derstaliding, (-T)iah collision corridors. • Census Liurviat'!+ AN bir Aintrican Coinlnunity Sw-vey s Years ?013 throuuh 017: Percentage Of the: NIPLI]A10tr, by census tract, whose .Ln koinle in the lrgst 12 months was below0c poverh levo ~'i his, in addition to a high perur :lit rgk• cal r lijiuritic orper:sons ofcolvir imillc tela Hit: le,lcr.O L1u1'Iiition for l'nvirDlImenlA lkt,Iice (EJ)pcpalations. As t mmo rity-iii;ticariN 11I.th", LIse Of high poveily populaltiong was deter-n}ired to lie Iitost ; CfectiVc I'll assessi_1� ls.l populations in I-1mraii, o Year 2017: Reported comtttutcr made share. Hawaii Department of Transportation; 11Ues of'roadway owned by die State of Hawaii. County of Hawaii, Federal 6avertrment, or other {often less -used reads. rellee ive of private roads or "reads is Areas ofdiscrepnncy existed in the years of data awed fium FAR5 (2013-2017} rind COH PD (2014-` 018). This Was dLI LO the &SWO rri use flrc klrt:st 5 years of data frtlln each fioij ce, with FAR8, data tint beim-, as neem as the daTa provided l,y the COO PD. Going ''orwud, it Would be hcneficial to work with COI 1 l'U to turd a ineam to rccoiA and provide more dcwilw on all. involved, the potential uatise, and specific locations of all collislans. 111IS Will 11e]ir tltt~ c-VaiLrxtiott portion of the Vision Zero work with the hope of identifying areas for increased engineering. enforcemem, ericou.ra cnretlt. arid cduc:atitin. Haviali Island Vision Zero F=M Traffic; Coiilsiorl Data & IR+lappirlg i PTE' October 30, 2D19 TI Crffic Collisilori "tip Evlttafiou luta± Traffic Collisions. Vulnerable users were d1!i1'?ropartionally 1c111cd (lalcvcle: 5°lQ; Pedestrian: 12°ln 11 color vchli 21c: 83%) on Hawaii l-sland as compared Lo the latest rquved c(]rrmuterlaacde �Ihary 0,4%,, walk-. 2_2%:, personal vehicle,�7t'ia�. Ileis ln(iicatesa higher likelihood k1 peoplr: dying on Hawaii rsl;and diads 'It" Irl;vei:ling by foo ci bN bicycle. The majority of all fatalities (68%) occurred on State owixd 1111-idN evcn Ll-wugh Lhe SLatc owns only 28% of all s ove'rrurlent ( State{Ccuntyfi=ederal) owned t oad.s on Wan& The highest roncenLralioti (37Vo) of'hicycle (2) and pcdcstrialn (5) fatal traffic collis.ierls occurred in i1do. Of Ihosc' (2-0"/6) rafrll traffic collisions fell within areas where grti.atc.r thwi 0% of the I-g1tllaflon's incnlne is hele}w the povorry lev 1. Village and tc vii %:onwr; c\pcct&l► have 111c highesL 1)u17ihLr of pcopic 'k.11kirig �1nd h cycling dui: 10 OW c<IW 0l' [raveling y1101'1 distarces by rune is other t1t.111 17L'rtiCalw[ vehicle. 'I Itis is w lily conte.at maL[ei in. rluxidway design, and safely of pl d&striatx5 and bicyclt � shOUld Itis prioriti}.cel 'M the,4e piapol,_tior centers. th,.Yr the 5 -y -car study period (2013--10 17). filial traffic collisions 4c.tL111�1 [cllr~rv�:lty} ;1 io%4 it) 21)1.1 113) r'tlrtilLr ec'L�arel, ilx 0 hiAorical N1 l SA PARS daL:I lhiA jollomong lily 11 Im111111?Lr ,wl itiLa I Iro111k. C,esllt§I1M11:'i it .70(10 I ), C4t I It 11", .;r;.l.cll.I'III) VCJtlcc( 1 4) �l 1 � yei1r liil 2ii1 1 (13). Total i.ltil117ies ae-'l,lhrtL� 1)on1 tllt?-"e i.ollNiollti �M ihlrly tV;lc wd a 19- ycai lo%v iin 2014 t l 3). fb:lu i_ig 1 hi�11 :n 2004 [.4' 1. k-Vlieai LI'�:Ih: lines li'oin ianrrllall -.chicle rnilck .r;i5.cic•4 (%Al I') C01' ihL- SLItC OtA LIwtall Lo 1 .t4ti traTtic QD11isions for 11-11"kaii1 Island. it 0-LI11 hC SM[I 14ai as VIM l increased gradually from 20iA1, lilt -1 1r.;CY11C COIHS1011', 1MVC t10( 1r14'1'0Z1:tiCd at the sata'1C rate. I ills is IndicFative of lll": !111±71-1.7ViAlt )[" to vehicle safety. fim�-vv4r• the r'gniricaitt reciuctiun inv11iT realif.ed ill 21.11 1 tIiIo°; ly carrclates with the rcdLK:1Ion ill traf iv rCLLLCd CacaliG s. Tlici-uby. LhaL a transition to marc susiain.ah]t 1­1110dc�. zuc:i n1, bu-s Lr.ansit_ bicycling. and 'walking, in addili►lm tri niore 1.e mp.tO development 11thl 1.11111 Ilse, c`1It h�1�c t11c iniendC(I r;:Slllt t)f11 reduction in traffic related fatalities. SSF-m Year Fatal Trarfit Collisions Traffic Relaled Fatalities 2000 34 38 20031 2 30 2002 27 28 2003 30 33 2004 33 41 20 05 33 40 20107 34 3 8 2008 29 29 '100924 1, 0, 23 y�.34 1 (11; 16 2416 27 27 23 26 13 21 3? ''01733 3 2018 30 32 Hawaii Island Vision Zero Traffic CDI[Isle n mato & Mapping Paye 3 OcWber 30, 2019 * - During the work on this projccl, ?019 NH TS A PARS'clata was maize available and inx:l«ded in this table for c amNrison hUl n00 ineluciCLI in the mcm dcluiled analym-S. Hawaii 151drd ViswnZ�tra Tragic Cc 116i v 0l1,a & Map pfris Page a October 30, 2039 Residing Gip Code of 11 otcwrisI InveIYed in FstluI Tr•a�ffie Collisicns: l I7 cheltxting majority (R7%)ofall failwTvelriclr drivers involved 41 afatal traffic collisi-111 4 k:� actii_ic•�'� ofHawaii lsland.Olhet LIrivo!rs invel-v d vverc froni neighbor islands (41 ,4 wnd :►t ILr �I..�s Qfthosc drivers from Hawaii Island, the l:lr jcst Ni—c ntage wer firm Iv (14ifo. 33), 9674D {Kalh13 Kana, 19), 96741) (Keuau, ]'- ). 9 778 (F'.ihou, 1 il, alid 9i; ; ;- (Occ,Lin View. 7), l'tarts coup cock 96720 {l iilrl.y. 90778 (Pahoa ). acid all of 96717 Vic ,� I liav : rire: s where greater than 25"/n of the. Forulation is below the rr,, A. 1 lr.< shows that the problyrn of motor vehicles 1 111 fiig peoplL- on Hatwai i k1and rasa{: I� "w r rrt needs io Lle,addressec through the education ani] C[1COtt.-acL171�rtt ui` 10]:L l rcwicl�ral,. 6. Hipli 10aIalitY Nei I$,i `h: i Iigh Fatality CQ1TiLiO1-N' .tl." rerlCk:,iVk:4;I'L-0111111A011 rO41d%AL1y 4Pt176`Iltti ill slat falghest perecillagc of I: ss�m Hawaii Island Visiann Zero Traffic Collision Data & Mapping Page 5 October 10, 20A 1-:aaPSpvccl-RcIa1ed 'rrsMc C'ollisiori%, '1'r i111c- collisions where speed 4o1i`*ldort2d a fak:�,i-mal'sL4 uta 41%ct1 all halal traffic cul IisiOr. ti, lir .11C wlat1�t of flan-aii. Ll,.ii I)t:rc:critagC is 440v. rationally, Lhe average is ,',j of all fatal Lraf is collisiaos. The peicl—L3r gc: for Hakkaii Island is its line iwilh the Ante of I lav,,aii ho%vev'�r hath are sif nificantly higher Ll iin the n0i :,:tal average, 5uggcsl[ng a proialc.m throughout 1 lawwaii that should bc, addressed through edt.1k:U11011, crrl'OrC10Ment, and enginecrkrrft. The highest riercentagt DC NI=d-r-elated tatalides on Hawaii Island occurred on roads with posted speed limits of-10-35mpli (,40.11/ , This is truc for all 1�aal traffllc coffisions on Hawaii Island as well, where 359/6 01 -fatal traffic collisions awere or, roads with posted speed limits of 30- ; 111 ph. ;NationaIIN - ilio highest pert: 01" tatLrlitit S I ant I-0Jdti with p+irsted S Ded lit7ki?l G1"50-5511)1111 + 11 1t0a(ls kkith posted shed limils ImAdc III[] ITY0 of all traffic rcliu,cl IWLEIL :tieti rttfioiwlly, I'hc 4ighvr perceiwq;e ofttitalitics on 30-35€1 ph roads on Hawaii Island is potciiiiLillti- dUL! tO it lower rtumberefroad miles shirt haws! tipL_L!c1S lh3gher Lhan 35nxph. Hcwwev+cr, tlrc :utrictri+,s :ti1d deSign Of 1.1111CS0 roads MUN kms: it factor it) i1IL1UC1'r1 s�errcl ink;, 3. Frital Alealri VDrug-Related Traffic C 011i*SiOILS: l'lle nlalOrlt� (55%6) OffOtAl Lr'a.ilie coilisioiv� Aieiv iieted to ht• alcc>lttll Wld O. 'Eli II.12-111'JiL7:.k1 ()f those fatal [IL -1111c Galli -.ions w hei,e We,crlwcrl Lr11cllcrr-dR1V}, were a liictor, sp LLtl -tkoconsidered a ftrclor in 43°fa. Wlicii 4"p7ii1'sk4lrig o} rt LraiI'I:� Vk ; tilt1kl�1 WlllIL:J)I'�Lt: (iiol inelLiding (ItIIgS alone) was a ilh:l;Pr, ."Q') of all fatal traffic ccsl isii)nt involved alcoht�l, Ili clic ,iaie ref Ilawaii, Ilse per ccln1age ,)ftIaffte ♦ rc.�l.t cl ltktat itics :i s�ociaLod %with ak7ohul is 35'I-," Nii Liomli ly, tic avcragc,� i 3T) U f of al trak r' ki,od tL,tll.€€ es wkoh i? ire Bill:` will, Lhe numberN Ir'Y�m I larwLiri Nhind. Mi it'L` tiignil€oantly, the '0-25a!,1) L1111CLI'rike- When considering all forins ul 113chriaation (drugs ;Ilr(lfcii ;ilccll>Icrl), pw5IiiiIs towards i 3; I'ckiLvI` •i L' fkIr 4LIIIUI31 L1r5jIIV,C IIII'L)I, !h w.£I{IL_;Itii"rel. ag WC1t sJ,� d [ICVEj ror increased enforceniem. Over the S-VCkkt- sxctuh illic. p :`RS dom was analyzed. talal drug trrtd/or alcoliol related traffic evI i'sioIis Ila iirc:reased si4,-Ad�lw 1-61lowing a Iuw in 2014. 'l lis is in line with Lill ifatal traffic collision II-tild. Year Fatal Traffic Collisions Alcohol Drug an Total DifferrMce 2013 7 3 10 2014 3 4 7 -30°/fl 2015 6 4 ill 11 2016 7 9 16 { I r+l 2017 9 9 18 4. Fatal Traffic C'ollisiorrs During Davy/Night: The majorll} (55%) of Fatal Lmffic oollisions Km tlilwisii lslalld acctrrred at nighttime. Nationally, tho average is 47% ofall fatal traffic l~ollisiam�. With limiLations on strt.ctlight IumincsoL me o Icvcls, and hundreds of miles of rural, Unlit, roadways, i1 is asst uncap ecled to liavi.= a stighii} higher Lhan normal pace stage of fatal traffic collisions on Hawaii Island occurring at nighitime- Hawall Islanc VN -,on Zero Trafttit: C¢Ilisior Data , Mapping Page 1 Cclober 30, 2010 7. Traffic C'm Hisiun Dcpnsita (IIcat Map): 'I IIL� 11ip.lWz;I &tllsity Oftill ['f is uolli}i011S OCr:ii.lTCd in and around the most populated village and ri ccn(L rs. Crash density was highest in and around Hila tc)wn Crash dclisity in altd armind KatlLia-Kona was less coaacciArated, likely due to the limited road grid iaetwork, resciltinL� i i i coo Iisions beim co ne erkirated on maior roads in the area_ Simi€early, major tjrle.rhal� sowh of i111o,which constitute the majority of commater iraf is iii ilie regloiI7 had hi,Ell t1e1IS1IIeS Of :rashes, Waimea and Honokaa reflected smaller, yn cmicentrawd. dcnwities oftratfai; ciAlkions. Stantec September 13, 2021 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Box 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tel: (SOS) 494-2039 Mr. Clyde Hemby Via email: wayneh724hotmail.com RE: Comments on the Drat Environmental Assessment and Anticipated F0NSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kana District, Hawai"i Island Dear Mr. Hemby: Thank you for the comment letter doted October 7, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: The development is designed to use the least amount of materials, the least amount of labor, and is a large urban project being stuffed into a place with insufficient infrastructure to support if. Response 1: The project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. The proposed action toeing considered in the EA is the proposed development project within the current zoning. The project is consistent with medium density zoning and conforms to the guiding principles regarding urban growth patterns as defined by the Kona Community Development Plan (CDP). Comment -The schools are overcapacity and projected to be for at least five years. Response 2: As described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA, the project would be constructed in phases, and occupancy would occur over time. Additionally, it is expected that the project would provide mid -market, including workforce ,�-,using for the local community. The {project's first phase would construct rental Jnits, and it is expected that occuponts of these units would be loccl and many of the students already attend local public schools. Section 3.7.1 has been revised to Clarify that since the project would be constructed in phases, ❑II 99 students would not all arrive at once and occupancy would occur over a longer }period of time. This is consistent with predicted rates of growth for the area which Care considered by the Howoli State Department of Education in their forecast planning for public schools. Comment 3; The flood control is insufficient and will be made much worse by this development. Responje a: There is no history of flooding on this property. As discussed in the EA, the project would not contribute or exacerbate the flooding issues. Per Section 27-20 of the Hawaii County Code, the project is not allowed to increase any run- September 13, 2021 Mr. Clyde Hemby Page. 2 nt 12 off onto neighboring properties, so there are no effects on any neighbors from project run-off including on the County -owned parcels. Commenf 4: The current roadway is ea rural two lane road, with wide shoulders to allow vehicles to yield to the frequent emergency vehicles, and is not adequate for current traffic, There will be a substantive traffic safety problem with more traffic congestion and more severe ocaidents if this development is allowed before the roadway is (improved. Response_4 The other two options would be to (a) add a signal at the proposed project and (2) distribute the inbound project volume to make a south -bound (51 left turn (LT} at Lako Street, and a mauka bound LT onto Kekauna'oa Place to enter the development. Alternative t would add a signal, increase delay an Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway. Alternative 2 would increase delay at Lako Street, and would add considerable travel time for the inbound traffic. A SB LT of Kona Vistas would be basically waiting for a gap provided by the I ako Street intersection. A vehicle in alternative 2 using Lako Street would need to wait for a protected green arrow at Lake Street. Basically, the southbound left is waiting for a gala provided by the Lako Street intersection, it is more reasonable to provide and allow for left turns in at the roadway. Camrnenf 5: While it is tempting to accept a development for the economic and property tax boost, the proposed development of Royal Vistas as specified will be hurtful to the community in the long run. Response 5: The project is consistent with mediurn density zoning and conforms to the guiding principles regarding urban growth patterns as defined by the Kona CCP, and is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents. Comment 6: It will adversely affect three or more established nearby subdivisions. It will nol be substantially chevper for buyers, Market value will put the units out of reach of local families. Most of the units will be sold to mainland investors or rented out by the Honolulu developer so money will not stay withir the Hawaii island economy. Response 6. The intent for the project as described in the EA is to address housing shortages in Kona (Section 1 .2). 'To address housing shortages in Kana, the Kona GDP identifies Objective HSG -4: Build More Units and Policy HSG -4.2,, Workforce Housing. The workforce gap group (up to tib of n-i_dian income) includes the part of the population that earns too much to qualify for affordable housing programs, yet too little to buy or rent decent housing close tci their jokes. The Project would build units that offer a variety of housing types for both the rental and buyer segments of the mid -market which includes the workforce group. Although the Project is not specifically a workforce project, it would provide a housing option for the workforce gap group.' As evidenced by resort projects on the Big Island, as well as communities such as Waikoloo and lower Kafaoa (Ka`iminani Street and environs), different housing September 13, 2021 Mr. 121r/de Hemby Page. 3 n1 12 product types targeting different socio-economic built in chase proximify do not necessarily adversely affect property values or quality of fife. Comment T: Please consider that the best longterm plan for this land might be to leave it undeveloped. It could be set aside or acquired as open space land and used for a purpose that has a light footprint. Res2onse 7: Comment noted; however, hhe applicant action being considered and analyzed on private land in the EA ciao} not include a proposal for charge in zoning or creation of a public park. Although the project site has been nominated For POMC acquisition twice, bath times the Committee declined. C-ommenjJ8.: Page 125 of the IAEA .pdf file (Page 9 of TIARA cites data counted on Thursday, August 24, 2019, which was a Saturday. Response 8: The TZAR states Thursday, August 24, 2019, The wrong date is written here. It should be Thursday, August 29. 2019. as shown in the data sheets in the appendix and has been corrected. Comment 9: Page 125 of the IDEA ,pdf file (Page 9 of TIAR) tells us data collection was an Tuesday, April 30, 2019 and Th 1,1 rsdaay, August 94, 2019 which afire 116 days oparfl Are they .,cherry picking" data because of unfovcroble results? Why was this dame? Response 9: Based or) the numbers for the 2018-2019 monthly tourism numbers, August 2019 had the 41h highest visitor total and April 2019 had the 10th highest visitor total. This is consistent with the informatlon you provided. For all islands, the pattern is similar with high visitor vclurne in June -August, December, and March which corresponds to summer break, winter break, and spring break. These are when school is not in session, so visitor traffic is high as people travel more. When school is out, typically the coverall traffic volume during the AM and PM peck hour is lower. Generally, traffic counts are taken during "worst case" scenarios, which are historically an Tuesday through Thursday during school drays, This is information we know, and we purposely target school days as when we take our traffic counts. While tourism numbers may be love, the intensity of the peak during the AM and RM school dray peaks, are generally more intense than the AM and PM peak during non -school days. Here is the HDGT station can Queen Kaaahumaanu Highway in 2016, It shows that the maanthly weekday overage is very close to the yearly weekday average. The standard that traffic engineers use is the school day peck; therefore, the counts taken in April and august are defendable. Comment 10: The DEA is very inconsistent in reference to the very important TIAR, referring to it as o Traffic Impact Assessment Report in the tablas of contents and the cover page for Appendi 22 Crid a Traffic Impact Analysis Report elsewhere. With all the narrow sccpe and faailure to address many important areas, this report actually is reduced to ca Traffic Volume Study. September 13, 2021 Mr. Clyde Hemby Page. 4 n1 12 Response 10 The acronym has been added to the fable of contents and Appendix 2 cover fame. The report doses more than account for volumes, It analyzes the irnpacts on traffic from the proposed project. Commonif 11: Page 65 of the DEA .pdf file, numbered DEA Part I page 52 {Figure 9 - Proposed Improvements to Project Intersection with Queen Ka'ahumanu) is provided in very low resolution, making It difficult to see details t❑ evaluate problems with turning lane capacity, refuge lanes location and length, or dangers and conflicts with the Kuokini intersection. Response 11: The MUM states: 'The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic cantral signal„" There are other considerations that meed to be done before installing ❑ signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAI2 does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention that where an intersection may warrant a signal.. and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently worront n signal without the proposed project. The project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of oa traffic signal warrant. The EA has been updated to include a higher resolution Figure 9. Comment 12: The TIAR never examined traffic impact on Pualani Estates or Kana Vistas roads even os Phase II plan= to use their streets. They also omitted La'aloa Ave and Seo View Circle which are signclized intersections between Lako Street and Kam:ehamehoa III which were studied. anortse 12: Most of the proposed project's traffic would be wing to and coming from the north and would not affect developments sou#h of royal Vistas. Loaloa Avenue and Sea View Circle would not be impacted significontly from the inbound and outbound traffic south of the development. Not mare than several vehicles would be added to the Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway through movernenf at these intersections, and those would be 'through' vehicles which have very little impact on can intersection, cmmont 13: The TZAR does not mention the new Niumalu Marketplace at Henry Street that will open in 2020. Or the approved Hcmelonds' Villages of La'i 'Opua 200 unit project in Kealakehe. Resoonse T3: The TIAR does not include the Niunn alu or Lo'! 'Opua projects. It included the Henry Street infeFsection, which is over 2.5 miles away Irrarn the proposed project's access, for ran in -death look at the potential regional effects on the roads. The analysis showed that, as traffic to/from the proposed project disperses, there will be very little effect at these for away intersections due to the project's traffic. As for the two SB LTs from Henry that need to merge into ane lane, this problem has existed for a while. This is not a result of any particular development. This is the start of the bottleneck in the SB direction because of the September 13, 2021 Mr. 121/Je Hemby Page. S of 12 merge, and realistically will only be improved by then widening of Queen Kc`ahumanu Highway. ammer!UA: Safety and Health concerns were never mentioned and should be ars important part of the evaluation. Mere traffic capacity is taco narrow in scope. SSFM, which produced the TIAR in Appendix 2 should be well aware of safety problems in the area because they produced a study and a set of crash maps of accidents from 2013- 2017 for Vision Zero and classified every intersection in the Royal Vistas TIAR to be part of a "High Injury Network". On Wednesday, Feb 20, 2019 the Hawaii County Council Transportation Committee passed Resolution Number 38-19 to adopt the goals, strategies and policies of the Zero Vision Task Force to prevent traffic -related fatalities and severe injuries in Hawaii County. by a vete of 8-1. Response 14: While the TIAL did not include an in-depth crash study, as this was not scoped, SSFM did do a cursory review of the FARTS website and did not note any recent fatal crushes in the vicinity of the proposed project's access. Comment 15_: Queen Knohun onu highway south of Henry Street is not an urban roadway or freeway. It is a two lane undivided road and One slaw vehicle or accident car; take it from free flowing to stopped. This means infrastructure must came before the project starts building. It would be a disaster to have this project delay road improvements or try to da bath projects at the same time. Respome 15: While the widening of Queen Kca'ahumonu Highway would help out traffic, the tinning of this improvement is not known and is outside the scope of this project. Comment 16: The project will cause a substantive safety hazard and further study is needed, or this project should be delayed or abandoned until mitigation unser Hawaii County Cade Chapter 25-2-46 (e) is completed for the 5 LOS ELF deficiencies listed on pages 25-29 of the TZAR. Res onse 1 : The LOS E/F on these pages refer to left turns from Queen Ka'ahumcanu Highway or movements from minor streets. These are typical of left turns on major highways or miner streets. Even the installation of a traffic signal would still likely result in LOS E/F for these movements. Comment 17- The traffic study report has many references to Level of Service or LOS, w it ich is just a rating or a grade for the flaw of traffic. Many of the state regulations, including Hawaii, accepts LCIS d during peak hours as acceptable but LOS C is where general level decline is noticeable. Response 17: The analysis has been completed per State regulations regarding Level of Service, and has taken into account the peak traffic numbers. September 13, 2021 Mr. 121�/de Hemby Page. 6 n1 12 Comment 18: The roadway section} that is the key to the substantive safety hazard is state road 19 between Henry Street and Kamehameho Ill. The road from Lako Street to Kc meh arneho III has only inches of shoulderwhich is often obscured by vegetation. Response 18: Although the condition of the Lako Street to Karneharneho III roadway is currently very narrow and offers little roam to move over for emergency vehicles, this is a current need of the roadway and is out of scope for the project, Comment 1St: I have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic lmpact Analysis Repori (TIAR) (Appendix. 2 of the DPA). I orn specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed ir• the TIAR. Re$po_n_s_e__1_9: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 20: In the Kana Vistas sUbdivisior% the proposed project relies ort the use of a subs1cm dare roadway, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due tc extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahumanu Highway_ I am particularly concerned that Gadding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 20: Kekuana'oca Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all other Kona 'Vistas roads, including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana'oo Place from Royal Vistas Phrase 1 as designed as the connection of Kekuano'oo Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase 11 in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuana'oo Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehlcles during the PM Beak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekvana'oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Commenf 21: This DEA requires evaluation at'. among others, adverse secondary impacts. such cis population changes or effects on public fcacil Pies. Insteod of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious omisslon to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use: of subs anfial existing infrastructure, like Kekucana`oci Place. Response 21: Secondary eftects are indirect effects, or effects that would ti ccor at a different place or time than Fhe proposed project. These effects ore not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the IEA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuora'oo Flare. the number of vehicles projected to use September 13, 2021 Mr. 12/Je Hemby Page. 7 of 12 Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the ANI and PM peak hours, respectively). The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Commenf 22: The DEA addresses cdverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the profect would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant cloirns. "The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way, stormwoter would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design.°" Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 22: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and ❑nalyzed above in the body of the EA. —COm.mentl.23: The Planning Deportment should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which €ails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision a6sing from the project. Reso-once : Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 24: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2 growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Report. Traffic congestion is wear sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. B"ROnse 24: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 202:0 and 2035 were used to come up with the I% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering gat 2`7o, our traffic engineers used 1�% from the 2025 LRTP forecast, Comment 25: The TIAR does net recognize multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 25: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will' have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers jITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output, This land use has a very low steandord deviation and on I - squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. September 13, 2021 Mr. 12/de Hemby Page. 3 n1 12 .Cn_mment 2_.6: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume cf 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahurroanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2[ 18 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repol 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unUsually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with f=igure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approxirnotely 1050 vehicles per hour in 20T6 for Northbound Queen Kaahurnanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum, 10% v-ariation generally accepted in day -today measurements and thus unreliable, Response 26: The most recent Historic HDOT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kaahumanu Highway section between Noni Koiluo Road and Huolalai Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDQT Count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to soy if the Witcher Engineering report i5 overcounfing, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HD07 Count. Comment 27: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen l:aahumanu Highway and Hualalci Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic Corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for (monitoring of the intersect%on of Queen Koahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be pricritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will he exacerbated by the proposed project. Response 27: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices �MLJTCD) states, "The saNstaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.'' There are other considerations that neem to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. it should ❑Iso be noted that many of these interser--ticns currently tr arra of ca signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Comment 28: 1 am specifically concerned about floods similar or worse than those from 2015 which damaged homes, exposed ❑ critical water main and posed danger to motorists on Kuakini highway. Response 2.8: Flooding has occurred makai of Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway from waters in the County -owned Holualon Ditch and the Horseshoe Bernd Ditch and as described in Section 3.3.2 of the EA the proposed project would not September 13. 2021 Mr, Clyde Hemby Pale of 12 increase the amount of water carried by these ditches from the entire drainage basin extending miles up -hill as the project is not allowed to do so. Comment V: The steep topography, historical rapid storm water run -cuff and associated damage present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the DEA. Response 29: As noted, the steep topography results in rapid runoff during heavy rain events. There is no record of dcamcge to the project site or adjacent n—operties from said runott. which is carried away by the two County -owned Glitches and State-owned culverts, Comment 30: 1 yam aware that page 21 of the DEA in a conceptual drawing illustrates the large flood plain that will be directed and concentrated into a ditch that runs over or under two of the subdivision roads" With roofs and pavement preventing any water absorption It will worsen flooding as it proceeds downhill. Response 30: Any increase In drainage from improvements woula be directed to alternative run-off or storage facilities such as dry -wells, as approved by a County -reviewed drainage plcn, and would not flow onto adjacent prcapertieS. Comment 31. They DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood. A proper environmental assessment cannot leave meaningful details to be taken care of in the future. As I understand it, such circumstances would lead to unlawful project segmentation among other errors. Response 1: Section 1.2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the Iwo County -owned parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify that on TMK (3) 7-6-21:19. "Infrastructure during Phrase 11 of the Proposed Project includes installation of o culvert system along with utilities and roadway across the ditch to extend Kekuana`oo Street, which would thea be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the Kona CDP "Official Transportation Map." For T K (3) 7-6-21:18. the project includes infrastructure for chonnelizing a portion of this ditch and includes ea road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the Kana CDP"s "Official Transportation Map." Figure 2 has been revised in the Final EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages in the Project Area. Additionally, the text in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that Kona Three would prepare a Drainage Plan to ensure that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by DPW. Text has been added in Section 3.3.2 of the Final EA trm identify passible options for addressing the issues from existing flooding. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. September 13, 2021 Mr. 12�/de Hemby Page. i Dot 12 Comment 32: A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority chat needed infra tructure will comply with government regulations is insufficient. At a rrninimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must be revised to show specifically what infrastructure Improvements ore required to tie info the County's drainage system and how those irripfovements will function. Response 32: The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design of the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at a later date, the potential imparts from their construction are onalyzed. Comment 33: The DEA Table 2 Bird Species Observed in the Project Site seems incomplete which is not surprising if the field study only allocated an hour during daylight hours for bird observation. The study for this DEA does accept the responsibility to do a thorough and complete job and not just speculate, especially when it comes to endangered and migratory species. Response 33: The biological inventory report docun-encs the species detected (which took many hours and many avian species were detected) and potential habitat at the project site. The Bfological Survey Report in Appendix 3 of the EA acknowledges the limitations of a biological survey of a large project area and the absence of any particular species cannot be warranted from the survey's results. While additional species may be present, it is the professional opinion of the Hawaiian biologist that there is no passibility that the Hawaiian craw is present in the project area. Therefore, the EA includes ca description of species detected as well as potential habitat for native species in the existing conditions part of Section 3.3.4. The impact discussion includes potential impacts to Individuals and to habitat for native species iincluding those not directly detected during the survey). The impact discussion including pratQction measures to minimize these impacts to native species (including avifOuOna and lacus) and their habitat in Section 3.3.4. Comment 34: It seerns odd that an unmonitored survey that at one paint in time does not find evidence of the Blockburn's Sphinx Moth would then allow the developer to destroy food and habitat for the endangered species Response 34: During the survey, none of the Dost plants for either the ado,ilt or larval stades of the moth are present. As stated in Section 3.3.4 of the EA, to prevent potential impacts to the Blackburn's sphinx moth, the project would include the following protection measures. A biologist tomiliar with the species would survey for Blackburn's sphinx moth and its larval host plants (tree tobacco and native 'aiea) between November and April or several weeks after a significant rain and within four to six weeks prior to construction. Surveys should include searches for eggs, larvae, and signs of larval feeding (chewed sternsr frays, or leaf damage). If moths or native Veva or tree tobacco over three feet are found during the survey, Kona. Three would coordinate with the USFWS for guidance to avoid irnpacts. September 13, 2021 Mr. 12�rde Hemby Page 11 of 12 If no Blackburn's sphinx mchh, 'a]ea, or tree tobacco are found during pre - disturbance surreys, Kona Thiee would ensure that measures are taken to ovoid attraction of Blackburn's sphinx moth and prohibit tree tobacco from entering the site. Tree tobacco car) grow more than three feet in apprcArnately six weeks, and above three feet in height the tree tobacco can become a host plant for Blackburn's sphinx moth. The Proposed Project would remove tree tobacco less than three feet tall and monitor the Project Site for new tree tobacc-o grown before, during, and after Project construction. Monitoring for free tobacco after construction, can be completed by any staff, such as regular maintenance crew, provided with pictures of tree tobacco at different life stages. Comment 35, While the lack of infrastructure regarding roads, traffic, floods and drainage has been covered there is a shortage of school infrastructure to support such a large medium density project, because the schools are already over capacity and expected to reri7air- over capacity for five years or longer. On page 59 of the DEA .pdf file (page 46 of the DEA), a fictitious telephone and data supplier has been specified as "Hawaiian Telephone". Response 35: As described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. the project would be constructed in phrases, and occupancy would occur over time. Additionally, it is expected that the project wculd provideworkforce housing for the local community. The project's fiat phase would construct rental units, and it is expected that occupants of these units would be local and many of the students already attend loco] public schools. Section 3.7.1 has been revised to clarify that since the project ;would be constructed in phases, all 99 students would no] all arrive at once cnd occupancy world occur over a longer period of time. This is consistent with predicted rates of growth for the area which are considered by the DOB in their forecast planning for public schools. Regarding telephone and data provider. the text has been revised to clarify that telephone and data services are provided by local utilities. omrnent 6: There are so many aspects of this project where no information is offered. Response 36: These details would be identified during final project design, which would be completed close to project development. For the purposes of the EA, potential impacts frorn the project to the environment are disclosed. Comment 37: Fire Protection on multi -unit clusters of buildings. Response 37: The project would be compliant with all applicable codes and standards of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1, Uniform Fire Code, 2006 Edition 1which is the Hawaii State Fire Code), September 13, 2021 Mr. 12�/de Hemby Page 12 of 12 Comment 38: Will the units be ACOA compliant? Will the units have ramps Will the units hove elevators? Response 38. -ext has been added to the EA to clarify that the development would be compliant with American with Disabilities Act Standards for accessible design. Comment 39- 1Nill there be a maintenance feed WHI there be a HOA fee or an HOA or Just ca r-nonagement company? Will there be a fee for satellite dish Installation. Response 39: Consistent with standard practice for housing developments, for Phase I of the project the rental units would not have any separate maintenace fees since these would be incorporated into the rental costs. For Phase 11 of the project, an Association of Apartment Owners CACAO) would be established and that group will determine fees. Regarding satelitte dishes, in Phase I the owners would likely provide reception to the tenants and in Phase Il the installation of satellite dishes would be regulcted b the A(DAO. We sincerely appreciate your revievv of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Staratec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. miche le, lefebvre-: 'stanfec.corn cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Mealj a Jackson, County of Hrawal'i Planning Department DATE: October 8, 2020 TO: Michele Lefebvre Stantec Consulting Inc. P.O. Box 191 Hila, HI 96721 Email: i-nichele.iefebvre@stantec.com CC: County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 95720 Email: planning@hiWaiiCOLinty.gov FROM: Janice Kerr 76-4320 Leilani St. Kona Vistas Subdivision Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 808-938-1185 RE: Project: Royal Vistas Housing Project Island: Hawaii District: North Kona TM K: (3r`') 7-6-021::016, 7-6-021:017, 7-5-021:018 and 7-6-021:019 have reviewed the Proposal provided to the County of Hawaii Planning Department by the Developer of Royal Vistas. I currently live on Leilani Street in the Kona Vistas Subdivision, and have resided Gere since 1994. 1 have some serious concerns about the negative impacts of this proposed development: have watched the traffic at the intersection of Lako Street and Queen "K" Hwy increase exponentially over these past 26 years. It is now at the point where the volume of Voest -bound traffic down Lako Street backs up from the intersection at the Highway to the extent that the signal turns RED, before all the backed -up vehicles turning NORTH DR SOUTH onto Queen "K„ can proceed through the intersection. They are forced to endure a lengthy gait for another green light. Per the Proposal, this intersection's traffic flow grade is currently rated "C" and "ID". The impact of Royal Vistas will cause deterioration to "E" and "F". The same is true of Fast -bound traffic corning up Lako Street to ween "K". The volume of vehicles on Queen "K" North -bound AND South -bound is increasing at an alarming rate, and soon we will not even be able to turn onto Lako Street from Leilani Street (arid other streets in Kona Vistas), due to the volume of vehicles backed up from the intersection. The additional traffic from Royal Vistas pouring onto the Queen "K", increasing the existing volume, will worsen every direction of travel significantly more than the models show That is because the models do not depict the ACTUAL - on the street - difficulties of travel present now due to the current degree of congestion. Most likely the proposed subdivision will generate more traffic than presented in the Proposal because there will be more significantly more delivery vehicles, which are not considered in the Proposal. There will be more personal vehicles, also - - houseguests, rentals and purchased units with multiple families, vacation rentals with multiple parties per unit,, to name just a few of the possibilities. In addition, the north end of Leilani Street (frorn Lako Street to the Church) is a quiet (quasi -cul-de-sac), used by a significant number of Kona Vistas' farnilies with children and pets, for walking, running, biking, etc. There are no curbs, everyone is on the street pavement. My driveway is less than 25 feet long, my only option is to back out of the driveway ante Leilani Street, which would be close to impossible with traffic. It would be very unsafe to add any volume of traffic to Leilani Street as it is. It would also add enormous vehicular noise pollution. This Proposal will significantly lower my property value and that of most of my neighbors in Kona Vistas. It is unacceptable and very unfair to lose the value of our collective investment in order to make money for the Developers. We have all worked hard to keep Iona Vistas quiet, healthy and safe for Families and Seniors. Please oto not destroy the goad environment so marry of us strive so hard to maintain here, merely for the benefit of a few greedy people. strongly recommend decrial of this proposal. Sincerely, Janice Kerr Mori, Ashley From, };inlceKerr ajkkonaCPhsY.a1ie.rite I rnet� Sent. Thur -,day, Octobel 3$, 2020 2-58 PM To: MGchele k4e-bwe cc Planning Internet Mail Subject: PROJECT: Royal' Vl�s as Housing Project; island of Hawaii; Mstrict of North Kona Attachmqents: Final RV.dacx Flpati w_, sr,f ad' 'fieFi response fe above rnforenced Reyal Vistas Housirg Pra;e�t, I lawdu island, North Nana Distrid Sirr;. NRlY, Jan�:�; l•3err LeilEni St Koflw Kona, -A 96740 MU -9:18.1 1€.11 X6976 DATE: October 8, 2020 TO: Michele Lefebvre Stantec Consulting Inc. P.0, Box 191. Hilo, Hl 96721 Email; michele.lefebure stantec.com CC: County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Paunhi Street, Suite 3 Hilt, HI 96720 Email: p?_�.nning@htavv�)iicount "9 V FROM: Janice Kerr 76-4320 Leilani St. Iona Vistas Subdivision Kailua-Kona, Hl 96740 808-938-5185 RE: Project: Royal Vistas Housing Project Island: Hawaii District: North Iona TMK: (3f') 7-6-021:0116, 7-6-021:017, 7-6-021:018 and 7-6-021:019 have reviewed the Proposal provided to the County of Hawaii Planning Department by the Developer of Royal Vistas. I currently live on Lellanl Street in the Bona Vistas Subdivision, and have resided here since 1994. 1 have some serious concerns about the negative impacts of this proposed development; I have watched the traffic at the intersection of Lako Street and Queen I<' Hwy increase exponentially over these past 26 years. It is now at the point where the volume of West -bound traffic down Lako Street backs up from the intersection at the Highway to the extent that the signal turns RED, before all the backed -up vehicles turning FORTH OR SOUTH onto Queen `W' can proceed through the intersection. They are forced to endure a lengthy wait for another green light. Per the Proposal, this intersection's traffic flow grade is currently rates! "C" and "ll)". The impact of Royal Vistas will cause deterioration to "E" and "V. The same is true of East -bound traffic coming up Lako Street to Queen 'Y' The volume of vehicles on Queen "V North-buund AND South -bound is increasing at an alarming rate, and soon we will not even be able to turn onto Lake Street frorrm Leilani Street (and other streets in Kona Vistas), duce to the volunne of vehicles backed up from the intersection- The additional traffic from Royal Vistas pouring Onto the QLaeen 'OK", increasing the exist1116 volume, will worsen ever direction of travel sign ific,a-ntly more than the models show. That is because the models do not depict the ACTUAL - on the street - difficulties of travel present now due to the current degree of congestion. Most likely the proposed subdivision will generate more trafficthan presented in the Proposal because there will be more significantly more delivery vehicles, which are not considered in the Proposal. There will be more ppirsonal vehicles, also - - houseguests, rentals and purchased units with multiple families, vacation rentals with multiple parties per unit) to name just a few of the possibilities. In addition, the north end of Leilani Street (from Lako Street to the Church) is a quiet (quasi -cul-de-sac), used by a significant number of Kona Vistas' families with children and pets, for walking, runnIng, biking, etc_ There are no curbs, everyone is on the street pavement. My driveway is less than 25 feet long, my only option is to back out of the driveway onto Leilani Street, which viould be close to impossible with traffic. It would be very unsafe to add any volume of traffic to Leilani Street as it is. It would also add enormous vehicular noise pollution. This Proposal will significantly lower my property ware and that of most of ray neighbors its Kona Vistas. It is unacceptable and very unfair to lose the value of our collective investment in order to make money for the Developers. We have all worked hard to keep Kana Vistas quiet, healthy and safe for families and Seniors. Please do not destroy the good environment so many of us strive so hard to maintain here, merely for the benefit of a few greedy people. strongly recommend denial of this proposal, Sincerely, Janice Kerr Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsufF3ng 5eFvkes Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hila, HI 96121 Tek 18081 494.2039 Ms. Janice Kerr 73-4320 Leilani Street Cailua-Kona, Hl 96740 Email: jkkona hawaiian[ntel.net RE: Comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawal'I Island Dear Ms. Kerr: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Blease find responses below to your substantive comments. Cornment 1: Traffic at the infersectior of Lako Sireet and Queen "K" Hwy has increased exponentially over these past 26 years. Per the Proposal, this intersection's traffic flow grade is currently rated "C" and "D-" The impact of Royal Vistas will cause deieriorcation to "E" and "F". Response I. This traffic signal is long due to the split phasing, and the volume on Queers Ko`Cahumanu Highway, which is still two lanes at this intersection. A short term, interim improvement can include the changing of the phasing at Lako Street from split to protected, protected permitted, or permitted, and changing the cycle length. It is known that this cycle length is very long, shortening the cycle length could provide shorten waiting times for the miner street approach. Also, the widening of Queen Ka'ahumanL Highway would improve the LOS at Lako Street, These improvements are discussed in the Traffic Impact Analysis Report JIAR�. Comment 2: Most likely the proposed subdivision will generate more traffic than presented in the Proposal because there will be more significantly more delivery vehicles, which are not considered in the Proposal. Response 2: The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Handbook referenced in the TIAR (Appendix 2 in the EA) used for the traffic analysis uses housing units, and it does not assume one person per unit. This is taken from the ITE trip gen handbook regarding land use 220: 2,72 residents are assumed for each unit. There is no trip generation fu,' number of bedrocrns. It is difficult to analyze and make projections based cr, ri,imber of bedrooms, or how many people we expect in bedrooms. The ITE trip generation for land use 220 collected data on low-rise multi -family housing, and based on that data, the traffic model carne up with to best fitted curve, which discussed below. has a very low standard deviation, and a very high R squared value, which indicated September 13, 2021 Ms. Janice Kerr Ptge.2of2 that the dafa collected is not scattered. The TIAR assumes a land use that is typical, and with the best possible data, captures the number of project generated trips. Comment 3: In addition, the north end of Leilani Street (from Laka Street to the Churcha is a quiet (quasi -cul-de-sac), used by a significant number of Kana Vistas' families with children and pets, for walking, running, biking, etc. There are no curbs, everyone is an the street pavement. Response 3: While it is passible that after Kekuanca`oo Place is connected in Phase II of the project, some residents could travel into the project site from the south by turning onto Sunset Avenue, then north on Leilani Street (or Pualoni Street), then east on Lakc, and then west on Kekuana`oo Place, this woL ld represent the majority of traffic or where I,._.,_.l ,I could occur. This is why the traffic study focused on impacts at the intersections identified in Section 3.7.2 and in Appendix 2 of the EA. Comment 4: This Proposol will significantly lower my property value and that of most of my neigPbors in Kana Vistas. It is unacceptable and very unfair to lose the value of our collective investment in order to make money for the Developers. We have all worked hard to keep Kana Vistas quiet, healthy and safe for Families and Seniors. Please do not destroy the good environment so many of us strive so hard to maintain here, merely for the benefit of a few greedy people. Response 4; The project is consistent with medium density zoning and conforms to the guiding principles regarding urban growth patterns as defined by the Kana Community Development Plan. The analysis in the EA cannot speculate on property values. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. It you have any additional comments or questions about the EA„ please contact n -e at (308) 494-2039 or by ern ail. Sincerely, Sfantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. urick,eIe.lefebyre; ,,stantec.cun^, cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawal'i Planning Department Mori, Ashley From. Marts Barrer,as <barrerasmarta@yah00_corn> Sent-- Thursday, October 018, 20120 12 �B PM om; TPlanning Internet Mail Subject Royal Vistas H-ousing Project EA. comments D C I- RA7'I{7N 01 NJ,ARTA BARRERAS 1, MAWIA BARRERAS. declare-: 1 ttra a tcw, cd ial of"K.iilua Kona. +County 4+f ll:�trva °r, �ta3tr (if llawati`i. The pruposed land 01evelctlrtrtent prCjCC. that is rhe• kLmhject of the pending Drall. EnvXonniental Assessmcnt suhrrtitta:d by Royal Vistas, Housing ProjectTam. MELp Ivey Nos. (3) 7-{-Q[:016, 7-6-021:017, 7-6-021.018. aa1d 7-6-021:019 Noilh Kona DistricT. I kuvai'i Island. State etf Htrwai'i "[TUCts nle perSttl allV as uxel l a+, aiTects MY IT111C !� in retal ]Prop,uTty. l 14+It,ly Withiill .05 111iles, land devQlta}tm nl project. lrt ;i�� h E•afrt�ritics. 1 have fir-diimui kruaWICJE,c. cif thv following facts and covid and would testify therc(o irCallet.l uJUM (0 elk] SU. I have rc�,tc -gid tlic pending DRA f ENI VIRCI';ti','�iE;�J"IAL ASSESSMI'\ l' atnd artaul�rttct�t -. 1 aarnx spr:calacall,y "ijomed about: ArAiealogical sites_ 1 c.1�3 aioc const :lcr that the stctdies offered rat support of thy: Drag En iroranc:ntal Asscssn-kml are adequate. 1 -he FA %vaa charts: on only a VER V SWLL portion of the Large Uereat11r aT ;aa. 'I'ltt Nt)rthwv'esl ;Lnd North area of'the property is thae home crl'an artcie:ttt hrtlua and wdti NOT asscssed or doL:umcntecf. 4. 1 am aNk aro that substantial e�,idmce cxists that the land encompas,ed by ihL suh}t!i:t latid paaTuef includes features Df the llclualoa Slide, including rock walls that tire vias tquately described as agria,ultural walls ill the archaenloZical studies offs-rcd in support oll'lhc Drill EnvironnicnLal Assessment_ The 11olualoa Slide is ail important Hawaiian cultural and archacolobr.Lval tearture from lyre-Wcstem vonlact times that canna; he rt iIaeed Ifdamagcd tar CICS rroya.d, 1 1.16661 i. I b" my concems uIxin Ihu c valuaLion and =alysis performed by Torn PuhAu Stolle, l have spoken with him personally and he has statements regaTding the anf.,] nt historic 1iolua running through this sits;. H�: Is ,cry' lat,rc5tcd in the restoration of Ihis situ 6. In Surra, the Draft Em, ironnlental Assessment doc% nai discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the irnportauat Ha vai`ian ct�lturtll and archa olt}gicai features van be widoiVoad. I.et alone pri)perly presmed. 7_ At a rrlmimtma. the Draft Ew. iroinro vial Asws6ziicut Must be revised to addrt�sw rhe lac:a(ion, data r&zo vcry and pre crvalloa ofthe HoIualoa SIide c. niponents present on the mjbl cL parcclw. i. The developer's rci-Ion statc% that 11IL!% cuusultcd ttaaatv parties fioni ()I [A, clu, wliinn I ptmsonaily kru>w arl: against this dci ration 'Thc dCVCIONT'S rclxtr# I0 allude that they had consent trcrn these partici, Crom whuin tht y definitt4y DO NOT hav c consum. I declare under penalrtv ext ped ury that the rorcj4aing k truc. DatV& Ka]ILRJ-K0Iia, l lawai`i, Octohcr 8. 302f}. Stn=t;,iy, 2 Marta Barrer September 1.3, 2021 S,tantec ConsutFing Senrtces Inc, P.O. Box 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Ms. Marta Barreras via email: bar r�sr,artrQ rca'�L cr7' RE: Comments on Cultural Resource Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawrai'l Island Dear Ms. Barreras: Thank you for the comment latter doted October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DF_Aa for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments.. Comment 1: 1 do not consider that the archaeologiccl studies in support of the DEA are adequate. The Ela, wns done on only a very small portion, of the large acreage area. The northwest and north area of the property is the home of can ancient holua and was not assessed or documented. Response is Numerous archeological studies were performed, covering 100% of the entire project's land area. Regarding the rock walls within the project site, there is ❑ historic era read (Site 24211 1 } documented. This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of a h6lua. Also, the walls were 1.0 rr-seter in height and is similar in constructed to similar historic era rock walls constructed along historic -era roads: property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of c Land Commission Aword (LCA) x€3660. Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the .Feature 2 wall at the same gulch. It is unlikely that this is a hdlua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a h6lua in the project site. rcmment 2. 1 am aware that substantial evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject parcels includes features of the Holualoo Slide, including rock walls that are inadequately desctibed as agricultural walls in the archaeological studies offered in support of the DEA. The Holualoo Slide is an important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if damaged or destroyed. Response 2: As described in Section 3.6 and included in Appendix 5 of the Eta, two Archaeological Inventory Survey (AIS) reports were prepared for the project. Q� September 13, 2021 Ms. Marto Barrens Pale 2 0l 3 As part of the AISs, sites in the project area were docurnented and evaluated for their significance. The AISs were conducted fallowing Hawaii Administrative Rules 13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6_ All 40 sites were considered significant under criterion d because of the information that was learned during the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the AISs ensures that their information is not lost. The documentation done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. Regarding the rock walls within the project site, there is a historic era read (Site 24211) documented. This road is not very straight, hos obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, cs would be expected if the site were the remains of a halua, Also, the walls were 1.Q meter in height and is similar in constructed to similar historic era rack walls constructed along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern portions of the project site. These two walls are located along the boundary of e Lond Commission Award (LCA) #3660. Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends In o gulch and there is o gnp in the Feoture 2 wall ct the same gulch. It is unlikely that this is a halua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, them is no evidence: of a holo a in the project site. Comment 3: l base my concerns upon the evolucticn performed by Torn Pohaku Stone, I hove spoken with him personally and he has statements regarding the ancient historic holua running through this site. He is very interested in the restoration of this site. Response 3: In the email provided. there is reference to "the portion of the holuo at the Holua inn (that) has rack walls on both sides" and refers to parallel walls within the proposed development area, possibly Site 31182 f=eature 2 and Feature 3 walls which are LCA #3664 boundary walls. Primarily. Mr. Stone's email responses provide accurate information conceming the cultural importance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the near -coastal region between Koiluo to the north and Keauhau to the south. The ren tains of many of these complexes were first mopped by Henry Kekahuna. Mr. Stene correctly states the religious and social irrmparianee of he`eh6luo and its connection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures along the coast and in the near coastal region, However, the complexes are located more than 1.0 km west of the project area and there are no remains of royal, sacred or sociopolitical complexes, or a h6luo, within the project area. The existence of a h6lua within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Stone. As discussed above, there is no documented oral history, archival documentation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a holua course existed within the project area. Q� September 13, 2021 Ms, Marta Barreras Page 3 of 3 Comment 4: The developer's report states that fhey consulted many parties from Office of Hawaiian affairs (01-11A), etc, whom I personally know are agoirst this desecration. The developer's report seems to allude that they had consent from these partes, from wham they definitely DO NOT have consent. Response 4- Section 3.5 of the EA states that consultation wcs sought from OHA and other parties. Consultafion does not imply consent. As described in Section 3.5, consultation means gathering input in on effort to assess impacts. We sincerely apprecirte your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 474-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@sttanfec.com CC' Richard Wheelock, Kama Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From iangychesler <AIiyyo",Ip11,3;1Cepts.COM o- Seat: Thursday, October 08, 2i}2Ci 1;27 PINI Tm Plaromr}g Imernet Mail Subject; Royal Vistas Housing Prefect Attachments: KV Dec larat inn re Traffic-rion ku owners.pdf VIP-Cunuepts htE�:.'r ru�rYv�ol�c:Unc ��a15.��rn 75MC-130 Paulshla St- Kdilua-Kona, Hi 56740 p # 05.9+30 2649 1-808.217 W42 1.1666() L)l :t' l _. R► A 1"10 411 1. ANGI•.I .A VI H;S1.>f•.K. declare. I _ I atm a resident 4I PuaIwti E,statcs COU Of IIOWA C I. Stag" of Hav ai' i. The proposeJ lalid development project d-iat is Che suhject (if the pwnding Drak E.aviwrimental Asses; anent submitted by Roval Vistas HOUSin4 Pro cct Tax Map Kev Nos. (.;) 7.6.0.21:4)1 b, 7-6-0-11:017. 7 -6- 0211A -118, -6-021A-118, and 7-6-1121,019 North Kana Dhtrict. Hawaii lsiand. State of 11a�tiai"i rai7i:cts me 1wr,ionalIN is e%cII ar ;iClticts my interest in real property. reside within I mi9c jjis1411VeI VC[he l3ropubed hind de�.clapment projecl. In such cap t;ilics. I I ave Tinthand knCl�%le&Ze (�f JhC r0lI����'it�� 1a�'t4 •art l k P.�1�1 Urld w0Wd testify (lsare 0 if milled up -.111 N) &) q11- 2. 1 Ita>-e icvic4vcd the pending I)RAFT V N VI It UN NIL LN l ",I ESSM'EN I inclvding the I rarlfic Impact Analysis Room be SST -i 1 lttCca'ttraiicait i1. JJVd JL114 _20-10 an i atter 'hed as ApNndix 3 lar thi DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSO• EN -i . l alta ;Iwcrilically concerned uhttu4 aLkevr c traffic irnpsacls Muth withirt ailed w-itliout the Kona Vista: suNtivisinn shat are rraat fully or accurately addrt=sscd in the' Sr.q 1'ratfic Impact Anolwsi, Repml. 'l rafrit -1 11ic SSFM Cramic impact t%- jia1ysls Rep,)rt_ Xfr disCLr,sod in . he hod oI the DKAN 1' F.NVIRON, MENTAL ASSESSMENT ni pr. 48i 56, 67 and 71 . 3. III the KOMI Vistas SUbdiV1%i0Tj. 'thc 1imprsed project relics eras the u5c of a substandard randvvay. Kokwann,oa Place. Kekuaneaa Place is 4erti steep. has limited %IS[v distances elute la ext . me cw-ves and is narrow with m� ;idewalks. the impact of increased traffic- arising frovii Pliase 1 and Pha se 2 huiIdouts ofthe Rova i Vistas 1 -lousing VrLjccI is iriadcqualely :iddr'essed in the ISSI-M Traffic Impact Analysis ReIxiorr.. wllielt focuses instead on irrtpocts along Queen Kaahurnmw i hghwav. I aan f tar jct,l.Brl} C41riL:ef[k0L! Oi At :1E1111nc rrllnierotls vehicle trips to .Ind fro In a separatc sttWK,isiun Nv111 llQgii dan4crti :Irici I.;o3},�4L.Sj .+r". 10 Fe':IdCTI [.,,' 31()r1g KtAimmi,ou NUCC, 1 cunL'idtr that dic Plasmin, Dcpartmenl should regtiirc the aprlicaal to lcire-,5 llwt c 1. 1 lic DRAFT L°\XlRO'%A-lFNTA-L ASSE SMI:'N'1' regtaires ev,-iluali;.an oll aillong iktlwrs. rICkL'r.1e vt:4,upagf{x11 W1101ION, AI h k Lig too iA )fr±;l," 1a , -ha lge.4 arc" ffi'clS an'Imblif' Chapter I lla,,k.Lii Administrailve ll ilex- Ing C2d o1 squarely acldressinl their kws, ho"Cc 6:1, tL,; 01I! 11- I l N'VIRON\11 � 1A1. ANiESS'`,. ENI T simply ignures them, L'1131tlilfig thEtt a..ILi% � I',4 ',cL ondar} 01'e:ts girl's L:%p `4 t,:,1 tii'l l the ,.i,: clopment Nwuld lrtlllzr existins! in P'r:istriic.turc. provide Infill t��rr:;inW�, :110 IS LFL :�.1,C- t:wli to result in substantial demands to Umintt' 4er,,icer." It is it serious onoi5-sic►n liar the DF AF'1- 11,NVIKO )MIEN f Al, lck C%Lal Lig adtin!sS the putentiOl a LlVeP a impacts of increasing the mbc of su%startclar-d AitinL il11-3tnmure, like Kekilann'tm Pllace- 5. The DRAFT tINVIRONiwlEN I'Al. ASSESSMENT addresses ative"e traffic impacts only i n the conwnt ce l` whether the prc►jt-ct would Have on 1rtthlrc her11th The APplil:ilAt clalitis. 'The Propesed Project would not affect public heglth in ons %va) , slornmater "rind he appropriately disposed cf 4i dramage structures_ rrafticnimrmczti have >ieeil t,kcl7 r,tiir� tart*1ul con-idleratinn in prDject�" kmphasls added, This bald concltision dues not address potential adverse impacts as required Iry ('haptcr 11-200,1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. 2 6. Thi; Pfiu ring Dq�arttttent should nut accept the DRAFT UNVIFF()N'bILN I -Al. .AtiSC:S4ML:NrI reliance on the SSFM Traffic lnipaei report. which has the following deficiencies; a. failure lu awl&css adverse tratlic i irau%within the Kona Vistas suhdiwisiun arklug fr{ern the projvo; I], 'I he SSI- M I raf is Impa:t �xnak s;s Rcport use;, a growth rate of I %. III C1 P111rast IL, the. 2% sgru%Nih rate eMpI0r ticl hr tltc ?0I n A it�[Icr Impact An,tlwfsis Repart. Tmfli,; cangestiou i.% o cry wwsiLk4 Lu qov th rate in a vorti-Iinenr. :\Tw +engin rrlaucw C, i lie SSS -.11 I .rI l iv Inipuc,t Anarlysts Report dogs rant rcw a"Itifc multiracnirationatl [causing charalrtcristic;5 Lonmi,.,n in Ha%xatii accord Alp to census da(.t ',.iad likciv widerestjolatcS daily vehicle trips attrihtrlathle to huildout (if the proposc d prujecl; the SSF%1 Fratiic Impact Analysis R prktt owplov,,; an u,tmuLdlk Ioww -Alcle vralut C M'951, whicles ftkr N01111hound Queen Ka;lhttr avu hitglw ay eau the svici led Jules ail April 1I1. ?ll 19, ai w iccktiu • and August 24. 2019. a Saturdi%N. companod wirli the 'i] 18 Wircher F:nginevving Frral'li4 Import r1uly'sis Rcpurt, i, likh rcported 1057 uehic&ec for January 14 and ;, 2416, hath .veoktl v,., I he unu-quarlly low rap)rted vchicl€ volurne of 353 is also us odds with Figure 4 orthr SSFNI Trnllic lntpatct Analy-sis keport_ which shows alppN)x1 titttciy 1050 ',apices Per 11aUr in 2016 for VwThhnund Queen Kaahlrmanu Highwway at 7 a.m. The difirencv in volutrte is more than doubic the maximum 101/t, variatickn generallw atccepwd In da} -10 -day Mcasurements and thus unreliable: _ The recorn mendation by S�YM Traffic Impact Analysis Ropurt for a roundabout at Quezn Kaiahumanu Ihghl ay arty Huslalai Raad (North) is inconsistent wilh the traffic can-idnr. Intersections that pass warrants btrr rerMin urtsignalired present traffic "f'eLN ti:thiility conecrni tier the Lwovcrameau f. The reewimcndatipn by SSF.M Traffic Impact Anal}sig Report for monitorine sof ;lrc ]IZterSecLit)]L of Queen KaalrumanLi I Iigh"dy and Kuakirri Ilighwat, is inadcyuat6:. Wherc. ds lcrt. all inLmectiun pLsscs more flim one warranL under all conditions, it should he prioritizL�d for stud) and design of a signal rur installation. This circumstance will he exacerbatcd by the pl-Lipo,wd prujecl. 7. In sum, the Draft Environmental e° sw_%,micnt ;iod �;SFNI Traffic llmpacL Analysis Ropiest dm-; not present suffi tent_ credible fkls arid anal 6s such that the adv rge iinr}acts on VdMing infrastructurc and resulting Iropli increased traftic can he fully underctoml and rcqutt in ,ipprA.rprialc gmt rsiwvtl plait iag and rcsl,o wc, tictilarc eavdLl r puiwht OFIV17 LI Y tlrat d f rugol tg, is true. Daied: Kaalmi-Kutun, Kiw ii,i. 10.8.. '11020 4 PrlllLCd ateunr. Aligehl C hcwlLl Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec ConsufFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek t$QS) 494.2039 Ms. Angela Chesr via email: Angy4 vipconcepts,com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated f:ONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Dear Ms. Chesler: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA} for the proposed project. Blease find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Anaiysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I arty specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fuIly or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment -2., In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies car) the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoca Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight diztances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kcahumanu Highway. I cm particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Plcice. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2. Kekuano'aa place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the some specifications as all other Kona Vistas reads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on IKekuana`oo Place frorn Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of KekuanWoa Place to Royal 'Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuano'oa Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roua,�iIy one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oo Place every 4 rr7inutes for the peak pariods, which would not cause congestion. Q� September 13, 2021 Ms. Angela Chester Page 2 of 4 .Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as papulation changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. it is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or Time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7, i of the EA. Regcrding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana'oc3 Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the A.M and PM peak hours, respeafively�, The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The IAEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicont claims, "The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; sformwater would be appropriately disposed of In drainage structures. Traffic impacts have leen taken into careful cansiderafion in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sectior;s as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in hurt 5: Findings and 'Reasons, ❑nd accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the Body of the EA. QgMm$W : The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Krona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a grawth rate of 1%. in controsf to the 29, growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TZAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a neon -linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDQT) counts did not show can increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Longe Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 20201 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1% growth rate. Aitl-c,iugh we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got tin, our traffic engineers L ei= 1 T from the 2025.LRTP forecast. Q� September 13, 2021 Ms. Angela Chesler Page :� a Commenf 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics con--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 1. It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation handbook was used and low-rise and rid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has ca very law standard deviation and on R- squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8. The TIAR employs an unusually law vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repo 1 1, which reported 1057 vehicles, for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually law reparied vehicle valurne of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 201$ for Morthbaund Queen Kaohumanu Highwny of 7 a.m. The difference in volurne is more than double the maximum 10°70 variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahum anu Highway section between Nani Kailua Read and Hualolai Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to t�)e 2016 HDQT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard tc say if I ne Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is unrl oir,ling, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those f r,-)v7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queer Kaahumanu Highway and Hualaiai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but rernain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns far the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queer Koahurnoru Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prcritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Response 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCD) states, "The satisfac.Ii _ n of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing o signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where Q� September 13, 2021 Ms" Angela Chesler Pope. 4 of 4 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project_ The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of ca traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact rrtie at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely„ Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mich le.lefebvre stantec.corr cc: Richard Wheelock, Konya Three LLC M aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Law Offices Of STEVEN D. STRAUSS puss Office Box 11517 Hilo. hawa 98T21 Tatephcna {8081969.6684 Facsimila t808j 930-3882 Stevan D. Strauss a mail: steverstrpiusslawyerLigmaii.cm I-Toensed in C aliforria S f• Harm" fi,vil ane Criminal Teals V Inbelluulual Pra;:tpriy • Buairw;ib V Environment & Lomi ',J -5e *��►;�T��T ��T'�T�1`���►�1'T�►�T►7�'��r'i�'r►Tl�ww'i�RTT7 Tfti�'t'i�'l�rI�TT'� October 8. 2CJ20 Nuchae! Yee, Director Hawai'+ County Planning Department 111 Pauahi Street Suite 3 Hilo, Hawai"i 96720 Re: pend 1ng Draft Environmental Assessment subnnitted by Royal Vistas Housing Protect Tax Map Key Nos.. (3) 7-6.021.016, (3) 7-6-021:017, (3) 7-6-021.018, ard (3) 7-6-02.1:01 g North Kana District, Hawaii Island, State of Hawaii Clear Mr. Yee - 1 represent Kona Vistas Association, Inc., a non-praf't corporation comprising an association of homeowners and residents of veal properties located within the Bona Vistas subdivision adjacent to the proposed development project. Thank ycu for the opportunity to provide input regarding the draft Environmental Assessment. This submission addresses three main issues; traffic impacts, archaeological informatlon and stormwater drainage. These issues Mst bc- addressed individually and cumulatively. For the reasons stated below, my client considers that draft Environmental Assessment is deficient in each of these areas. Accordingly, the Planning Department shiould not accept the draft Environmental Assessment in its present form- See, e.g.„ Kaleikina v. Yoshioka, 125 Hawaii 53, 283 P.2d 60 (2012) (in context of accepted 'EIS, a reviewing court uses tine "rule of reason' to determine whether an EIS Is legally sufficient in adequately disclosing facts to enable a decision- making body to reader an informed decision_ Under the "rule of reason," an EIS deed not be exhaustive to the point of discussing all possible details bearing on the proposed action but will be upheld as adequate if it has been compiled in good faith. and sets forth sufficient information to enable the decision -maker to consider fully the environn-lental factors involved and to make a reasoned deeisiori after balaricigg the risks of harm to the env ronment against the benefits to be derived from the proposed action, as well as to ,T -41,e a reasoned choiw between alternatives_ (E-nehasrs added,) 1:16963 October 8, 2020 M,chael Yee, Director Hawail County Planning Department Page: 2 Traffic Impacts The Traffic Impact. Analysis Report by SSFM International, dated July 2020 and attac had as Appendlx 2 to tine draft Env1ronmental Assessrnent does riot fully u accurately address traffic Impacts likely to result from the proposed development loth within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision. Traffic and the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report are discussed in the body of the draft Environmental Assessment at pp.. 45-55, 67 and 71. First, the proposed project ralies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuar9a`03 Peace, Kekuaria"pa Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. T'i'le impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the Royal Vistas Housing Projoc t inadequately addressed in the SSFM Traffic impact Analysis Report, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahumanu Highway. Of rmrticular concem are the resulting addition of numerous vehicle trips to ansa from (rye Royal Vistas Hou sirig Project separate subdivisicir) will present darMgeFS and congestion to residents along Kekuana'oa Rlaoe. Kona Vistas Assvciatiun, Inc. considers that the Planjun€ Department should require the appticant to acdress these concerns. Second, the draft Enviranrnental Assessment requires evaluation of. arnong others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects wr public facilities. See Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawa,: Administrative Rules_ l nstead of squarely addressing these issues, however, the draft Fnvironme:ntal Assessment simply ignores them, claiming that "No adverse secondary effects are expected since the development would utilize existing irxfrastructure, provide infill housing. and is not expected to result in substantial demands to County services." it is a serious omission for the draft Environmental Assessment to fail to address tha potential adverse impacL9 of thea propnsed projecfs increased use and reliance upon substandard existing infrastructure, like Kekuana'oa Place. Third, the draft Environmental Assessmert addresses adverse traffic impacts only In the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public heaffh. The Applicant claims, 'The Pr©pnsed Project would not affect public health in any way, stormwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts. have been taken into careful consideratign in project design." Emphasis added_ This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Administrabve Rules. The Planning Department should October 8, 2020 Michael Yee, Director Hawaii Oourliy Planning Department Page 3 rewire the applicant to specifically address adverse traffic irripacts resulting from the proposed project in the ccntext of adverse secot) daiy impacts. such aspopulalion changes or effects on public faciirtres as required by Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Fourth, the Planning Department should not accept the draft Envircnrnental Assessment reliance on the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report. which has the following deficiencies' a. failure to address adverse traffic impacts within the KDra Vistas subdivision arising born the, project: b, The SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report uses a growth rare of 7°�t,, n contrast to the 2'�u growth rate amployed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering Troffic Impact analysis Repert. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non- linear, exponential relation: C. The SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report does neat recognize mc11111- gernerational Iousing characteristics comimon in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project; d. The SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report employs an urnusaally low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Koahumanu highway an the selected dates of April 30, 2019. a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact analysis Report, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 16, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report, which shows approximately 1050 vehirlas per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen I aanurnanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10% vanatton generally accepted in day -to -clay measurements and thus unreliable; e. The recommendation by SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report for a roundabout at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road ;North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain urisignallized present traffic safety liability concerns for the govemment-, ' Please see attached Assessment of two TIAR'or tha Ro cal Vistas ,f Ko a Vige Cev�I pme,�t dated September 25, 2020 by Pa nos D- Prevedouros, Ph, D. October 8, 2020 Michael Yee, Director Hawai'i County Planning Departni nt Page 4 f. The recommendation by SSFIvf Traffic Impact Analysis report for rrrvnitoring of the ir•tersec liog of Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where_ as ner�, an inMrsection passer more than one warrant under all nd tions, it shojid h -e ;ir nritiZ�c1 "or study and design of a signal for installation, This circumstance will ue Oated by the proposed project. In stem, the draft Environmental As%f-,ss►nii-rit and SSFfvt Traffic Impact Analysis Report does not present sufficient, credible facts and analysis such that the adverse impacts on existing infrastructure and resulting from increased traffic can be fully understood and result In appropriate government alannincg and response. 2. Ari F7 cologicallnformation The draft Environmental Assessment at tip. 42 - 43 recites that the applicant's experts sought consultation from, inter Alia, .J_ Gr_=rtes Tyier III, cultural descendent. and from KeKoa Nozara Kora Hawaiian Civic; Club President. Supposedly, Mr. Tyler provided sper;ific information that was not included with the: draft Environmental Assessment. Iona Vistas Association. Inc., however, is inforraned that neither Mr. Tyler nor Koko@ Nazara were contacted. Kona Vistas Association, Inc, is presently investigathV these disurepanc,,es and will seek to supplement this input statement. In the interim, the Planning Department should require the applicant to verify the information presented in the draft Environmental Assessment and the June, 2020 Cultural Impact Assessment For A 78.122 -Acre Property to Hiblualca 1 st Ahupua'a, North Kana District, Hawaii Island, Hawrai'i jTrw% (3) 7-6-0211016-0191 attached to the draft. An open question exists whetherthe draft Environmental Assessment has been compiled in good faith arra sets forth suflrcier t informatoan to enable the decision-rnaKer to consider fully the environmental fectors invalued- Next, the draft Environmental, Assessment only lightly touches on potentially important cultural Archaeological Resources at pp. 71-73, Chaptcr 11-204,1-13, HAFT, however, requires agencies to consider irrevocable carni-mil-ments of natural, cultural or historic resources when determining whether an Action has significant effects. Although the draft. Environmental Assessment claims that "no valuable natural or cultural resources would be committed or lost as a result of the Proposed Projed" and "No impacts to archaeological resources would occur withh,the planned preservation of the railroad taerm and petroglyph.", Kona Vistas Association, Inc. is informed to the contrary According to an evaluation and analysis performed by Tom Pohaku Stone, substantial evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject land parcels includes October S. 2020 Michael Yee, Director Hawwai'i County Planning Department Page 5 features of the Holualoa Slide, including rock walls that are inadequately desenbed as agricultural walls ir, the archaeolagicau studies offered in support at the draft Environmental Assessment_ The Holualoa elide is ars important Haa;lan cultural and archaeociginal feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if damaged or destroyed. See correspondence and -Igures attached hereto. It appears that the draft Environmental Assessment identifies the Holualoa slide parallel walls only as walls used for agricultural 1 ranching. Bona Vistas Association, Inc. is presently seeking to verity the information attributed to Mr. 5trno and will seek to supplement this Input statement upon. receipt of such ver, aiiun lit a minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must be revisea to address the location, data recovery and preservation of the Holualoa Slide components present ren the subject parcels. 3, Drainage The steep topography, historical rapid stormwwaler run -of` and associated damage present hazards that are riot adequately► addressed in the draft Environmental As5essmrient. The draft Environmentai Assessment does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the FIC-Cessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood. A proper environmental assessment cannot leave rneaninglul details to be taken care of in the Future, which would lead to unlawful project segmentation, among other errors. A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastrucWFe will comply with government regulations is insufficient. At a minimum, the draft Environmental Assessment must be revised to snow specitically what nfrastructrirs improvements are required to tie into the County's drainage system and how these improvements will furnction. 4. Cumulative Effects Once the three areas identified above are properly and fully addressed, the cumulative effects of adverse impacts in these .areas and all others must also be addressed_ October 8, 2020 Michael Yee, Director HawaN County Planning Department Page 6 Thank you for your consideration of this input from Kona Vistas Association, Inc, Enclosures pc: client TRAFFIC IMPACTS Assessment d two TIAR IOT- the Royzl Vistas / Kona Village Development Panic* D, Prevedcuros, PhD, P•ofP.Ssor n17ransn�rtatioin Engineering, Univ. of Haiwait at Manoa I'onci, u, 5eOtern ber 25, 2020 Throughout this document E refer to the Current TIAR (by 55FM international, dated July 2020) and the ad TIAR (by Witcher Engineering, dated Octol7er 18, 201B.} Both TEAR u5€+ otic standard methodology in thy, Highway Ca.zacity Man 4JaI IHCM) for assessing traFf r, irnpacrs, which Is F;eaneraily accepted in Hawaii. 1 was a past contributor of 5PLrificatuxi5 in the HCM and teach it routinely in my CLL 462 —Tr kV-ir Enginper ng course at UH Manca. A crltical etrmpuntyrrt in a TIAR is [Ii,-- number of trips generated iay the proint during the AM and PM peak hours. E oilt TIAR used the standard ITE Trip Ceneration M04els and came to very similar results as shown below, Table 9: EStiMated 1"rtprs Generated - PhaSe I L ind t1se [rrF Cade] MultE-f,1Mliy Housing �Uuw 81!;e} 12201 Cowelling Units New Trips AM Equation Ln (T) = 0.95 Lit {.X} 0.51 Z-58 117 PM .jatian Ln (T) = 0.89-Lrt N "1110.02 258 137 I n-1 Out i rt Out 2 3N 77Yr. 63`. 37!7a 90 86 51 T=,Total number DL trips generated, K = [�w 11'' units `rip Dist rib ution. Typical ly we expect rneawrabie impacts when a project generartes 100 or more trips along th c peak. #jar@Ct(Dn.. This project does not in PKase 1; irti Phase 2 the right turn from Fiona Y11age.5 ertl:o Queeri Kaahunranu Hwy. will he 108 vehlctes per hinur in the ARA peak. it sltaold be noted that wme rnrrvernents, left turns in particular, can becorrre proWematic with much lower volumes. Another critical component is the `Innskgrnund growth" which specifies the annual growth of traffic due to general Oopulation growth, otl t{ r developments in the region, etc, This number typically ranges between and 540, with t% r,;i 2% b,_,ing must typical rates For areas experiencing growth, unless I detailed estimates arwe availa4le from a regional planning model. The latter are preferred to an assurned growth rate. Traffic congecc t ori is vury sensitive to growth rage; it increases the volume in the Volurne-Lo Capacky ratio. WVher the 1,100 ratio exceeds 0.75, the existing rapacity is 75% utilized. It is a non-linear (e)(Parential l relation, therefore delays "skyrut ket" when t4E- V/C ratio ekceeds 0.9_ A growth rate of 1% rneari5 that a read that carries 1,000 vehicles now will carne IJ50 vehi�Jes 11115 years_ A, growth rate of 2% rneam that a road that earries 1,000 vehirle.s nQw will carry 1.30-0 vehicles in 15 years, If the capacity of the road is 1,Sou vehicles per hour, tiler current wriditions are good (the V7C ratio is C7_67), the future conditions with 1% growth xate we be cencerning Bthe VPC ratio Is 77%), and the future cor Coons with 2% growth rate will he poor Ithe VJC ratio Is *7%). If one were to add just YJ additionaI vehicles frarn a developrn. it -I n ftinire cnn1itions wit 1,1 1% growth rate will be coocerrning tithe V/C natio is SNA), the fui li: ,p,, wide 2% growth rate wr+ill be poor (the VIC ratio Is 90:x), bath of which will Pxae2rbatp 10st time due tcw traffic congestioli which In TIAR is represented by the delay per vehicle Interestingly, the Old TIAR used a growth rate of 2% and the Current TIAR used a growth rate of ilk., which, as l dernanstrated in the paragraphs above, is a big difference. In the Latter case, the e,st:n-iated traffic Impacts will he Iaw+er je.g., lower delays) .-ind getter level of Service IL05). However, the justificatlan gluen In the Current TEAR is credible. Old TIAR: 'There aro SL+veral other developments in the general ar-.:W in th u planning stages. blc;arly all have been in various steges of planning for surae time (10 years). The iea5ans they have not procneded vary from, not obtaining proper atoning to ruqulrements set by the Fkmninh; Bopartrnent in the past. It rannot be projected when, or if, these projects will proceed. Therefare, the 2 rise per year i ri the traffic volume required by the County should suffice this development's corning Vr lint;." Current TIAR;'"ThF 2035 Fed'emal Aid Highways Lung Rage Transportation Plan Forecasts average daily traffic in kna and Hawaii Belt Road to be 41,900 vehicles in 2020 and 4.8,0CY0 vehicles in 2034. This equates to a 1% arntj.a I pray. h rate over 15 years in the Kona area, A kxackground growth rate uF 1% per year was assurned, to account for additional traffic at the study intersections,' to ring on a regional model for forecast.5 is ;err; fez red to making an assumption TIAR analysis depends on traffic volumes collected in the field to toren the base conditions upon which The rt rure scenarios with and without the project are dr.alyze"d, Both TIAR use qrr- Ccvid data. therefor -E! ;hoer base volLiMes, are tairly representative of a normal PConornV. and n€arrnaI travel activity cQnditians, The two TIAR Cbolse to analyze different intersections and Have only one intersection i7 cOmMori: PUaPU aanui 5t. with ween Ksahurnanu Hwy, The vcJurries reported are shown In a screen capture for the Current TIAR, grad in ,rear handwriting for the Old TIAR (see page 3) vete to dav-to-day variation, a close match in the volume cf each move merit is not realistic; small deviations are nw inial. however, one large devtation Is wworrisomc,: the volume an Northbound Queers Kaahumarnu Hwy. 2 Old TIAR: 1057 1taken onjaRuary 14 and 15„ 201&j Current TIAR: 853 Itaken on April 30 and Augisl 24, 2039) The 201.9 level Q�tvolurrme in the Old TIAR assuming 1% growth over Three yea rs+wauld update to 1.US7x1.ij3=1,089, It ,> cLiccerr"Irtg that this critical volume on zhe Current TZAR is lower by 236 vehic es tic 2Z%. A differer-TLC in 'Jolurne arrer 10% Fs next generally accepted as rwormal day-to-day variation, ParlieuJarly 'ICT critical movements such as this heavy through movement on (lueen, Kjahumanu Hwy. This lower level of volume or Northbound Queen Kzatlrtrnanu Hwy, likely affects all prior intersedian wJvvuen I'uapuaanui 5t. and Kam ICI Rd. in,duding I lie 4cciess point fur Korw Vdla9ts. -'CW vOlurnes resuJ r. IDwtt r irslr,act an(t lex s ronservntivo ostinial es rn general. Lin fol Luriately, dwte traprcvjiling�;ondltivns (wvithCcv1d), a quick VrOflcationofthi:,vol ume Is not possilale. However, Figure 4 rrr the Current TIAR cluar+r ,I rows that Northbound Queen Kaahtimanu Hwy. tarried approximately 1,0150 vehicles at J AM Irl 201-6 ,%! i iL, i psjt!, in question the accuracy of the 8 vi veNcles per havr volume used in the Currrr ; :Pdl 251 1[1249 t3O) I 59 4443) Ln —4 w VN +^� rl- rR W 18,5 (11GA87(34) ~" r S Q 157 tom) r5;W e 26 (521 Queen Kaahumantu Hwy Legend PEak Hoar Volumes Bath TIAR show L @vel of Service (LO -K) results for the traffic movenients at tht irt1.ersectitan5 The A to F scale is easy tc ccinprehend. In rurai IoLations, LOS of Band C Should domirsate cc rapared to LOS r1 and E which are G13rnmdan iri busy cities. However, in bcirr, T1AR several rnrrvemertts show a LCIS of p or worse. To improve my understanding of how condi) oris sir _ hkely to L*watve, l prefer to use the Volume-tcr Capacity ratlo reporters as the v/c number In the Current. I LAR, As I mentioned earlier, this decimal number represents the porticin of roadway t-paclty (in vehicles per hour) that is utilized, Typically traffic irripatt5 aid delays are becorrmg substarrttal whedn this ratio exceeds 0.75, l rdaunted tllme instances and SuMrr'aria ad below, I also noticed that quite a few other imovements had a yr c ratty of 0.73 or 0.74, soy I included t1=.nsp a5 well, in a separate and in a combined calurnr. Looking at the cealumrd In boldface, In 2019, 27% of the mevarma nts analyzed were 5.ubst4ntially busy, that is, utiltred at 73% of capacilty or more. The lousy movernents are expected to more than couble In 2029 without the project, and nearly triple by 2039. On the other hand, the increMl!rlt.�jl effect of the traffic added by the project Is small, as rh+t resultant 2%. 5'X and 2% estinialPs indicate {at the bottom of the last colLlrin.) Uylt,5 all Current "nAlt _ T*Ot tx Exiding P: Cntersrcklcr Level Qf}arvke VoJ-M t4 Ca xMt ratio, A V. I'm adl t5 r.Yi, G.74Silm I }-&0 Tri 107tQ 5 1 1 I b 1 6 1 0 94 hiM.)Vamentr vrilhh� nWC wrttt U?� wri'ti v.�c Or, Y,ik, s�17.7.3 rsU.71. anal 5UM Tntad WaLhust T,Iei2:FuuiarElid4hihrstit intrl"M an Le vel gat 5 erirl cr 'FfL� 4id11: �.Llk"i.LdL`!4!'44�I iF� & R 1D $ 2 1 ;CG Tah1e 2L Ft�t, i4 �AQ�1'Ni I� F I iTabiaM,Fu:Jrc[tout ,14Ci irAersemm Level of Ser+ cc lfi Pfalece intersection Lr -del of 41 3 :d S 537% 13 i) s15t 50 T.4A,b 7r.- FiAwTo 2M Wlthwt ntersedicr Level of 5erwlwe ',T era a tntefsecsl nm Lowet d}f l5 1 1G Ji 1 1@ 3d r 7S Table 34: iidtwe 3EU4 With PrQjv-, intrl"M an Le vel gat 5 erirl cr R 2 C D 429E 3136. ,r+3 Tah1e 2L Ft�t, i4 �AQ�1'Ni I� F I ,14Ci irAersemm Level of Ser+ cc lfi 1 l r 11 4 L` .-:2 537% 50 Sir, Tabic 26 Fulrare MV.Nith 4111ect ntersedicr Level of 5erwlwe ',T L i Zl~ 3 +t l d L i l' ?° . This outcflme is 1n agrPeMern wvith the fici concluding gt:cte from the Old TIAH: "it tart be seem fyom this discussion that the irnpact ads exis.irg traffic by this development is minimal. However, With other dduvelopmenU factored in using that 2°. per annum growth rite there can be sigrttlfcant impact of the traffic if no mitigating measures are introduced." The Current TIAR provides arterl;al speed estimates for Sou Lhbounj a- J Nordboundf Queeri Kaahumanl Hwy.; see Table M on page 55. The Northbound directicn Fs 2xoect=d to opera -P subvantially slower than current conditions, The estimated 15.6 rnph for tt 0'0,1 p n';*d is C�orrr ,3 ,i to busyarterials in 4 Honolulu (pre -Caved.) Average speeds over 20 mph along signalized arterials are aan5idered gopd. i.e., LQS C or bettor.. Finally, I reviewed the recommandations for the mitigation in trai(ii :.rrtt:_ i tr, liar intersections or movements with a poor LOS. A mi; rsr weakness of the ON tlA.[I i L, L•^ A it 110 rant offer any specific mitigatior3s to irnprnve the estimated future LCS=E or r to snore acceptable LO'a=C and D. The Current TIAR includes specific suggestions for every intersection but Is racking of specific assessments ort whether the purposed improvements will actually work and improve LAS_ The Currenc TZAR recornr^i+tnd�tJnrs 3re cvpirrd below with my trarnments adders in Wldface. 1. Queen Kaahurnonu Highway and iaalam Road Sir;;nal tinlirif shokild be monitored .end updated to ensure that leftturn queues clear every cycle. This is an appropriate recommendation, 2 CWeen Kaal umarw Highway and Henry Street Signal timing should he monitored and updated do erisure tfiaL left turn rla:ieuor5 clear L-vviiv "it. row St-c':;srl°,pro7iirl ci ,, (or'r'-tly inrpe,r.n-r"' i') r^Ii ••r.,nr,- ! I-, -i7inr they -pert pha.5ing to protoirtnd left lap is 0—alsts ;1r1 HUI I "A!ee: ollI crliG`i4' .-,witL gii_ur. ;.ri - _lir °.I i'_ t '.alUr Lhruugh MGVC17ne1`1tS, lvwvcfing; die ovc,r,7l Iviav ol: the :nt+-r i,(- #inn, This is an appriapriate reeomrinr.:ndation. Quiantitartivc ji-,L,+-!,~meta of the improvernent of the proposad phasing change is needed. A aueen Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualalal Road lNorth) Gaged an the Niq traffic vnlumes, this intersection passes the Four -Hour warrant. Arhls irktersection pasrwd the Peak -Hour warrant In the 2019 AM peak hour and far all peak hours In all future scenarior .- Futurq� traffic should he monitored, and a traffic signal or roundabout should 6e installed if netda(i tau. priority sholuld be given Lv keeping ween Knahumanu hlighwny traffic moving and riot installing a traFfie signal If nvt vvarrartted by 4- or 8 -hour warrants, The rsverall delay at th€s intersection is 41.0 and 50.6 seconds per vehicle: in the 2039 AM peak hour, without and with the project, When the delay experienced by drivers reaches this level, the rrastbaund drivers are like y to find alternative routes. The suggestion far a roundabout is odd and will he inconsistent along this corridor. This intersection � requires close monitoring and study for signalixation possibly within 5 years, depending on economit and tourism condi IMS. Iritersectlons that pass warrants but remain unsidnalized are a traffic safety liability for the agency in charge, 4. Queen Kaahurnaru HighwRy and Hualalai Road (South) As the westhound left turn delay gets worse, drivers mays decide to use Puapu28JIM 5,reet to access Queen Kaahurrranu Nighway in the soutrihound direction. based on the exastmg vc Iumes, thus intersection did rtat past the Four -Hour vi arrant or the Peak -Hover warrant. Ths„ intersection did pass the Peak -Hour warran# for all future Ary', peak hour scenarios. Future traffic shoots# he uvrikared. This is an spproprtaty recurrmmuadatlon. Recall that Northbound Queers Kaahumanu Flfghway volume may be law In this TZAR which would conceal a potentially bigger problem. 5. ween Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaianul Street Signal timing should he rrsonitared arra adjusted asneeded to increase the prabaibiiitythat queues on Queen Kaah'umanu Highway ran clear the Jintersecrion in 1, ale. This is an agpropriatL- rprammendatior+, However, it Is not dearwhether there is enough space to accorrimodate the wailting queue of vehieles turning left. h. ULivear. Kaahumaru lniuhway and Royal Vistas Roadway This intersection will function acceptably through the full Phase t buildout. Mfore any Phase 2. rw,idcrces are ecoiupin�d, it Is recammended that the con:iertion to Kekuanw'a Place is completes. 5rl that Rayal Vistas Phase 2'lefi Ouf traffic can access the LLQ Streettrafiic signal_ This is an appropriate recommendation. 7_ queer Kaahuman u Highway and Kuakini Highway This intersection passes the FrR-it4iour warrant and Peak -Hour warrants during alb peak hours far all scenarios. Future traffic should be monitnred, and a traffic signal or roundabout should ice installed if nee.+ded. The rorthbound left turn movement is very heavy {300 -GOO aeh/hour by 2039 with project], which witl be nearly at capacity. The westbound left turn, while small, is already over capacfty in 2019 .arc will be far over capacity by 2039. Royai Vistas traffic has very little effrxet on this intersecrion. i his is a weak recomrnendation. An intersection that passes more than ane warrant under all conditions should be on a priority list for study and design of a signal For installation. It ca n take over 3 b years to install anew Signalized intersection, Wlnnitoring is not adequate. A dptaitM study and pian by Hawaii County is needed, regardless of the Kana Vixm development. S. Queen Kiahumanu Highway and Lako Street The Lako .Street intersection operates at LOS F/D (AM/PM) with or wirhout OiE: Royal Vistas project in the 2039 scenaria. SAD STreet currently has split pl}asw& (sequerrtial rather than t;encoirent) on the Lakya street approoches. Changing the phasing from split to protlected ;ett turns would 440p lower the delay T`tic :nte~sectioa would also improve signiftantiv it queen Kan},-ima-,Lu I-liphw'ay is widened to 4 1-1nes gar, i i ii 11)v )O.M) iransportaIicn Plan ;�u ntitative a3ibusimant of thu irnproveinent of the propg5ad phaisng change is needad. Recommendation 6 on this list may add more volume to this intersection. ; r;j, o,i Kaai7ur l,'MLI Aip.hWay ant, K 2 114*.1kamella tll Roar Signal timing should be monitored and updaLt-d as needed. This is an apprapriato ri�comrnerrdatian. 7 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INFORMATION I � ¢i'�r♦ ... - �4p._x1y4e.�n�Aye wll y�! • n y � a �,. .. ,. ,�, .1 ...ti. �.• � ,�. _�. � __+nom_. Hnlualog inns Stine IMIOM IlOn en;c w aro Cdirrin"4lrl1111-ati(pw6 with Mc Tori PWOLU 9inler Ax bt ttw i twler va" 1W tho ifildc with a I#AM VAW Board MWOM PA)Iow jim vw nnunii nqm w ilh liar Tom Pvhbku ata(* about thO twilit Wall Is and Uw shda wwtth a Ila v ftw Hw rd nuilitwirs on Uar1, JO 1, 2415. &C U. AIA Torn Ro t*w Stone — wroIA: 1b raAtww to gwoWan rogardNtp Clot waft •` r;:S, Not spWuw aildatat had YA" ttXA naa*, aG OHM all Klnvrrl ]WNW OW The Prlirpdaa was to 01W till mck In the Ode In rlOrtywd art WW IR NO" *&I robdad jobillinilippid VAwn you trantloKt mvovirg def bps from I'flaeki4na9W t wt b an hW0ftfl4p*IttwOWwVW Ktwe tr>MA Its wilt aA a COw W VNWM an *MnVM Were rittrkwg the Qrirat Yawn br OW ww'a, "POlWEhilu, jrr%Oaio, �t YVitr ttr rrtairl phir~�a�+i Of 111a elidtMt k�rtde saf !� YYitkh OYIbiMl9yll`[1lalllpOd la nil i n mla n to the gaiAe at tho ween" (uptl R r,"I} w4 ft spfrt mRty Mrs owwacUd with then arwd riaw Ther pliyalcpl ctALv i rrlrtdtlmpa til#Gne of M Win madam Fm ft h1flnp of thta story what rnada tr,eabw Irl l W, Now ki-p ftni io"dukQral r1� emgmcwly smcee ftim ma>Iltklwa UMOM I$ axwwUlad b Pta`W4. ak fne mpa, and giwt ommill AJM Nul of iU16 moftipunl (Wagilib. Iniatw soft s*Alrrll OWM Mlaant cOrwlscix" Sacho lith twadlna but rttano as grdlrxiftf. p{a°ww" iey KetlukeuupCshetlu'1a it aa1 Aw. %WflJtVO, Woklrwl, ant 1"100nuI IMsulj wenw the ealrikrr rolutrnlalr*ra Kt*V*W ftH tnt( allan Pu4YGtawrG Wd do chertge in lalipiran. Yho Holualoe EurnP is tkw,liiquU ft (;;Ynpkft a#Mtion'b"OKOONOW HIIiI Ct f?M'io.. DO f4vt. JIUI t, 2I.l4'Ir al WIL AM IcAn `IOM, n1jink ym far Uklmly rhe Vffw to eclucziiile ma. M Is Vesfl r ipprfie* d- The etawry eai HDIU&DO Is tl'" roinarlcawhlb, erxl I krWrw t imn unftr aar3altftett tft tartace- 4?n0 gOBEg iart I wool, ula jny w Ixw[ipq a' Iflo hvlue at 11v Iiokmlum Inn has a ruck wall KM troth Ishlera. 1Alnad guru wu°after h avo Wf,i, La, it Wt's Swine Wel rPathapo4 td Keip ft"orw4wrolf 1w MEN lravmW down.. I holt found, in the pfops ed a"IlowffM meas a saloon, of lsa mWl lrad'rraHa- M my of ttwar eallw I104ret5 have walls? I mOn ftwk you fw i8 W wwr help. 'Voty revac lI al UJ ylrrkaout. J04" l ah MM, Jell 1. 2019, 6.36 +typal Tarn wwnVW. ,Abba Jain, I krwowr I haw rwtrl bwtl n in CUNWL brWM d"O W 1 hawllsbiart gang IhraUr s11 My aarDrda arld alto IaOr Ifrit gipm You m.,e rKA gwtp b tlnd irmi h 6n an o iihrmy About VMI auris begallse-ft llrtr Paraorw wwlwo cm trta anlvy c,vw anii, A k* of dopplapirvi i has r J wrrgod the OuNiwrapl Iarwdaczpa in to aron G+.*9r I,.-* yaltal{ pwt2OD7w)arrdWI(h1tMY rudt" Cultbtal and ArchlilleatUFM IarrdlMMPO s® ICsa P=*- Hrllua tWM blah part of mr'twhw w wW It has bear, M eaaadil fvsxm mirowwraluplktlly ani" LvWUlwly. . I have Spmg VeM pmvkWVt7&jal*jx;mfti%aau xx,:wkjm4VrwaardiN1hi talm*ef�rrrteatt�l� wombdwaI bwom ap& nwa itlrsH ds to int+ ku% %n "xrltural Wndacape inlu die d jftkwn rtt p It N. WN "Vim VW ptiyalcat a.;aihsr*l Ylrrrbr,.ap.. riM1r; that said. therw I; a fA*.r1 r -%g dfii:An bawde n the "KOLwhm We, Kilu n "114, K*b6u2aWn1%%-W rw VarnalllR4 w ISasatn?,cwm'a. and kamoo;i-vmanr- T1we inuWapnwrmt or Kona over thin yrxar49 man aotxnratrad lawearsoyw l 1I,i Fi)�e, crxuancf n '310! wr aliida In ..r 6 1Awr AIG Ifl->11 Aka IT&TVAhmW].^_pa '_;'+_iloii-A of Hdwlom'_ itC fAs9reyf�ns6rm.romf'srircblko.�„wrdx�subjpcG'4�ie13b2 w vr.. li* gr ll rihr Crmppm llwt heed e)dM 1, Thu aaaOW Srtra a l Spills Om"T 11,58 .pow trm". pfutenkod W hod � r+M�# see�hdrrl��# e� riiJl u�dIC�p�d lC� AI phis ppCaMt lha� MirrrQM3Si7JB Should bwm Ara IxatacMfng what is lanai Mis guest ci mpkix, V* do Hamm tno K+ameh Wrmft # moats V&inW it phis cwrsp4%grhigh ifldMhd'p'd "CIN 10 114W 61 Hk WW sur( 6 wauid arduelsra yasu b bok at the greaw FAclsara Arid fC+(;im on MMrhOl to WA Of '9FWw sadm*K em if] tKm thk would Lwiialft ft auMWW h *twy ad Koor m sorry I'm nol q�l lalarld 00 alr ko at Inis til I bt.:' „ru Me deftkrlamerlhryhRQ oy r+na+e If yma "moo awrowle with tWA*W%w aftn kidlUmmi wch7iLm;hjrallarl maak)g 1 backgfm nd Irsl rm krlrxsnr hum MSSM but if YOU Mad DA6 in-dev!4 fcrse miclli hoaparMFPmOarAWWM, mrIpmv & =pirmj Ml y I'hrlkw_Mkln W& can dw,4j%s ;lilio Har K*sh,arrth movrdad Ibs MW dOtOW mm*AmwAV"l racwri w,r Mhis nrea+. Kroo lodge, IFnhar 0tolIon, arrd 1.-708rallmWgrn ref tow— irn.esr -kill+ —I how hl'e iv inlmr%vinoil hl 41 ir;lkrp M* kis hra'aJia'a Tom P6NWku $1 KarlHlu {pC B; la a 5f! F J rwrt paoM "riwaWfi, rk-ttu aW to cuMtlrnl & aC..W gdljcokm bread r n Nrafrllc�na 0 ow kupunm, L 8 September 13. 20121 Mr. Steven Strauss P.O. Bax 11517 Hila, HI 96721 Stantec Consafting Savices Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tel: (808) 494-20:39 RE: Comments on the OrcO Environmental Assessiment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawai'i Island Dear Mr. Strauss: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment t: The submission addresses three main issues: traffic impacts, archaeological intormotion and stormwater droinoge. These issues must be addressed individually and cumulatively. Response 1: Specific comments can the various resource are addressed below. Comment 2: The Traftic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) included as Appendix 2 in IAEA does not fully or accurately address krorfic impects likely to result from the {proposed development both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision. Response 2: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Camrrien# : The proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuana'oo Place. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase f cnd Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, and am concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from ca separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuona`eo Ploce. Rgslaonse 3. Kekuanr'oa Place is a County -awned road built to County standards, with the sorine specifications as all ether Kana Vistas roads, including paved sw ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact can Kekuana'oo Pierce from Royal Vistcis Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekualna'oa Place to Royal V'stcas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates o fatal of 30 additionol vehicles on Kekucana`oo Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oo Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Comment 4: This LEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores them. It is a serious emission Q� September 13.2021 Mr, Steven S;ra] iss Page 2 of 32 to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuona'oa Place. Response 4; Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna`a a Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and PM beak hours, respectively). The traffic analysis includes a detailed cnoly:sis of _ccnda�f traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 5: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project woudd Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, 'The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; storrnwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 5: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resc)urCe sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: f=indings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment b: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response G: Intersections within the proposed project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably step controlled and have only local residential troffio. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant_ Comment 7: The TIAR cruses a growth rate of M, in contrast to the 2T6 growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linecr, exponential relation. Response 7: Hawaii department of Transportation (HDOT� counts did riot show can increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lana Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used tc come up with the 1 growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used 1 from the 2025 LRTP forecast, Comment 8: The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable tea buildout of the proposed project. Q� September 13, 2021 Mr, Stever} S{ra] iss Page 3 of 32 Response 8: It is Lard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people witty two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the lbus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very low standard deviation and an R - squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 9: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kaahurnanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is mare than double the maximum IV,4 variation gererally accepted in dray -tea -day measurements and thus unreliable. Response 9: The most recent Historic HDOT count ovalkoble in the study area was the 2016 Queer Koaahurnonu Highway section between Nani Koilua Road and Hualakai Load (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided lr the 2016 HDOT Count. Comment 10: The reaomrnendatian by the I-IAR for c roundabout at Queen Kaahumoru Highway and Hualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for nnon4oring of the intersection of Queen Kcahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for studv and design of a ;ignr:l for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Resmonse 10: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (IUTCD) states, "The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that rimy of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily Triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. Q� September 13, 2021 Mr, Steven Strauss Pt ge. 4 of 32 Comment 11. The DEA recites that the applicant's experts sought consultation from, inter aGa, J. Curtis Tyler 111, cultural descendant, and from Kekoo Nazara, Kana Hawaiian Civic Club President, Kona Vistas Association, Inc., however, is informed that neither Mr. Tyler not Kekoo Nazara were contacted, The Planning Department should require the applicant to verify the information presented in the IDEA and the Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA). Rearaoe 11: In regards to the letter's statement that neither J. Curtis Tyler II nor Kekoa Nazara were contacted to provide, enclosed please find two email chains, one is between the project archeological consultant and qtr. Tyler Band are between our cultural consultant and Mr. Nazara, confirming communication, contact, and request for consultation was made with bath parties, Neither party chose to submit information to the consultant. In regards to the letter's assertion that portions of the "Holuo Slide" may be on the property, a detailed investigation and analysis of this assertion was made (copy attached) and it is confirmed that there is no evidence of any slide being on the subject property. Comment 12. Next, the IDEA only lightly touches on potentially important cultural archaeological resources. Although the DFA claims that no impacts to archnealogical resources ;would occur, Kona Vistas Association. Inc. is informed to the contrary According to an evaluation and analysis performed by Tom Pohaku Stone, substantial evidence exists that the land encompassed by the subject Innd parcels includes features of the Holualoa Slide, including rock walls that are inadequately described as agricultural walls In the archaeological studies offered in support of the IDEA. Response 12: In the email provided, there is reference to "the portion of the hblua at the Holua Inn [that] has rock walls on bath sides" and refers to parallel walls within the proposed develapment area, possibly Site 311$2 Feature 2 and Feature 3 walls which are LCA #3661 boundary walls, Primarily, Ivor. Stone's email responses provide accurate information concerning the cultural importance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the rear -coastal region between railua to the north and Keauhau to the south. The rcmofm of many of these complexes were first mapped by Henry Kekahuna. Mr. Stone correctly states the religious and social importance of he'eh5lua and its connection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures along the coast and in the near coastal region. However, the complexes are located more than 1.0 km west of the project area and there are no remains of royal, sacred ar sociopolitical complexes, or a holua, within the project area. The existence of a holua within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Stone. As discussed above, there is no documented oral history, archival documentation, or archaeological evidence to suggest a hblua course existed within the project area. Comment 13: The steep topography, historical rapid stormwater run-off and associated damage present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the draft Environmental Q� September 13.2021 Mr, Steven Strauss Page 5 of 32 Assessment. The draft Environmental Assessment does not discuss sufficien# facts and analysis such that the necessary drainage improvements and diversions can be understood_ A proper environmental assessment cannot leave rneaningtul details to be taken care of in the future, which would lead to unlawful project segmentation, among other errors. A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastructure wile comply with government regulations is insufficient. At a minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must be revised to show specifically what infrastructure improvements cre required to tie into the County's drainage systema and how those improvements will function. Response 13; Section 1.2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements can the Iwo County -awned parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been revised to clarify that on TMK () 7-6-21:19, "Infrastructure during Phase lE of the Proposed Project includes installation of ❑ culvert system along with utilities and roadway across the ditch to extend Kekuana'oa Street, which would then be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the KCDP "Officinal Transportation, Map." For T4K (3) 7-6-21:18, the project includes infrastructure for channelizincg a portion of this ditch and includes a road and utility system cross ng this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the KDCP's "Official Transportation Map." Figure 2 has been revised in the Final EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages in the Project Area. Addiflonally, the text in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that Kana Three LLC would prepare a Drainage Plan to ensure that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by DPW. Tent has been added in Section} 3.3.2 of the Final EA to identify passible options for addressing the issues from existing flooding. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design cf the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at ca later date, the potential impacts from their construction are analyzed. Co mmenf 14: Once the three areas identified above are property and fully addressed, the cumulative effects of adverse impacts in these areas and all others must also be addressed. Response 14: There has been no substantive change in analysis as a result of the comments above. Cumulative effects are discussed under each resource in Chapter 3. Q� September 13, 2021 Mr, Stev-n '1-rr: uss Page 6 of 32 Traffic Svpplement� Stimmarized Comments and Responses Summarized Comments Responses The internal study intersections were not a Failure to oddress traffic impact within the part of this TIAR, interna' volumes are project area. expected to be srr u I and not cause significant im Cc -S c- intersections. A better comparison for the project's numbers are historic HDOT counts rather I growth rate as opposed to the 2% than a TIAR done by ancther engineering used in the Witcher Engineering TIAR, firm. Our counts at the Hualalai (north) in'ersection were oc7mpcared to HDOT counts between Nang Kailuo Road and Huolalai (north). It is the professional opinion of the traffic engineer that the ITE trip generation is the The report does not recognize rnulti- best source to deterraaine the number of generational housing characteristics trips generated by the project, as it uses common in Hawaiiii data points frorn existing developments. Without justification, the analysis cannot depend on the use an arbitrary number, i.e. 3 vehicles per household. The traffic counts were taken on different SSFM traffic data seems to be lower than days. which can vary. However, the data the data in the Witcher Engineering TIAR. were oaken on a typical school/work day, and is comparable to historic HDOT volumes, The roundabout recommendations has been removed from the TIAR. The sofisfaction of a signal does not rnecar, Recommendation for roundabout is not that a signal needs to be installed. There consistent with corridor. Intersections that tyre other factors, such as signal timing satisfy warrants but remain signalized and phasing thct cculd cause delay and present traffic safety liability for the bottlenecks. rear end accidents That government occur more frequently at newly installed signals, and others. The recommendation includes monitored, and that a further study can be done for the si nal. recommendation will be changed from "Future traffic should be monitored, and o The recommendation for QIP Hwy and traffic signal or roundabout should be Kuakini Hwy to be monitored is installed if needed" to "A future traffic inadequate_ sigrtial study shoui.d be done to determine if the installation of a traffic signal at this in-ersection is appro rira'e". The TIAR counts are comparable to the The northbound volume seems low. It has HDOT historic counts. The counts used and much lower volumes than the cold 2016 campadsan to adjacent intersections are TIAR. defendable. At Kuakini Highwoy, the NB departing volume is 808, and the arriving NB volume at Pua uaanii is 877. The NB Q� September 13, 2021 Mr, Steven Strauss Pope 7 of 32 at Kuakini Highway is a little less than 10% lower than the NS at Puapuaanui during the AM peak hour, [wring all other peak hours and at all other intersections, the difference volumes of the arriving and departing vehicles is really small_ Also, our southbound volumes are a little higher then the historic HDOT counts, but our southbound volurnes are correct cis well_ Recornmend07icar S Or the cu rent T;AR See responses below_ Additionallyr, as includes specific suggestions, but is stated in the EA Section 3.7.2 and the lacking specific assessments on whether TIAR, these are for proposed improvements will actually consideration by Hawaii County and the work. Comments were provided for each Hawaii Jepcartrneni of Transportation. interSectian's recommendatiom. 1 . Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Palani Road: This is an appropriate Comment noted. recommendation, The TIAR does not propose a change from the split phasing. This intersection works 2. Queen Koa'ahumcanu Highvf,ay and acceptably, it was merely stated that Henry Street: This is can oppropriate chQngIng the split phasing can help the re corn mendation. Quantitative overall intersection L05. To clarify this, the assessment of the prosect phasing is recommendation for split phasing has needed. been removed in the TIAL and EA, and this intersection has the some recommendation as Palani Load. 3. Queen Ka'ahurnanu Highway and Roundabout recommendation removed HuolaIai jnorth): Roundabout is add for in the TIAR and EA. The slgnalizafion of the this corridor. Intersections that warrant a intersectlon should be further studied. The signal and remain unsignalized are a sa-isfcction of a worron' Noes not mean o traffic liobility for agency in charge signal needs to be ins#clled. 4. Queen Ka`ahurnonu Highway and Huaialai (south): This is an appropriate See response to corrlments above about recommendation. Recall that the NB QK traffic volumes. Hwy volumes may be lower in the TIAR. & Queen Ka'ahurnanu Highway and The recommendation says that this Puapuaanui Street. This is an appropriate i r�tersectican works well, but just in case, recommendation. However, it isnot clear the signal can be ad�ec# if future trCafliC ast if there is enough space to patterns change and signal retirr�ing ran accommodate the waiting queue of modification is needed, vehicles turning left, b. Queen Ka'ahurnanu Highway and Royal Vistas Roadway,. This is an Comm -rent noted, appropriate recommendation. 7. Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Kuokini highway: This is a weak Recommendation hcs been changed to recommendation. An intersection that recommend ca traffic study be dare for passes more than 1 warrant should be ca irkstaIIation of a traffic signal in the TIAR priority for study and design of a signal for and EA. instcrlication. A detailed study and p:cn by Q� Sep'cmber 13, 2021 Mr, S1ev-n S{ra] jss Page. 3 of 32 Havwali County is needed, regcardiess of KV development. S. Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway and Lako New 5ynchra analysis has been done crkd Street: Quantitative assessment of the added to the report. TcUe shows the improvements of the proposed phasing delay decreasing with protected, churige is needed. protected permitted, and permitted phasing. 9. Queen Ka'ahumunu Highway and Kamehameha III Road: This is an Cornrnent noted. appropriate recommendation. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document, It you have any additional comments or questions about the E.A. please contact me at (8081494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Sfantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. rnich e le.lefebvre,.a�sta ntec.corn Enclosures cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawal'i Planning Department .1. C. 1v4a. III 1jL.13k-11la,e4gilmi1,coilI r+, }xAcIll'I I:1L Utt WeOL t=ell i',�at TO N4.I Aloha C,ilimil, Yes, I = in in A7. -whore inti- wil'o mA i an wrilr}ping Nup Rime nwelic;al crinctltts and husine.q.p mnttars. I will be hack in k4anJa and uvailablw to talk with you the kvgwk of kt rvh 9. In the mcamimc. I veil I r4wiet4 your iltild1111em. '171nnk YOU 14 COMintL ng to keep mo in the loop on this matur.1 pr,:ktlnle you have alwm dolle Th'! same with Nlix4c I..LLI. Curt i s On Fich I R. 2020 t11 :3<34 PKI. Mom F:-mmit gL• .%L `Li rhw t;llw4,.unm wrolt: allot c £`urti's. K 1111 1 O aro d4�irl l 4%-111. 111OM'd S'41l1 W,� F' ill -`4.67.0141:1. Wr. We 4:01ldUC1111,; ;t L`LtIILJ1`,Li Mill l.lct :Ln,cs iii�i71 foi R 15IwL• k,A's proll�lt. il� II111i1:11+�:L lat. ;kltprtlt Karla. it illtiluKtws talk llr�?jlw1J with ills' Nurnil for whwh %ou oons 1llcd on Oic h I I'. Mae a;Vv the LIILuehctl CIA 4:Un,uha iorl IVLJLW-A 1'111 l;l IJ!; 'F 111 1 1 lea I -A. hlL ith Kona. If otl ill' JIJIVLj1tIV _�L'j. 11;14 111.lr-lljtt611t lt'! .li ,liil}' 1)!JL•I l it I11; 1 ilii;. , 1111111,il lwl;l icoi Ill i'loltWdoo 6L [41 4MlltiL1.t IIID I+1 k"JItUlt,. M all L1 k! NO O lAxh 1.;�tl1 It�ri `J�}i,t14)liiti 1-IL3lWlIOU I C1ILA CL1nNLlIL 1.4itar,pdf KAL) i Nvara , Lmiaaararr--mail.coin "fo.C,bmn fl,COt1 WM. Fch 19 al lil •15 AM 'wl AM KN-jul Wi11 dna, 11v the tivati l did find one adier catitwi I'ar rites deal and W.itiR project. I've bzen ss bkl-- v 11w en"t had a chane% To call him tul 1 will this week and ge bawls to you thanks Nvu firrA%i nn, iPhtanv 011 Cel, i ia, 21120. %1 12:21,4 11M. UIIr91 1'1�+itl �fa�r.��utt r�r.,ja,au.G dii - ►vrul� .1lahat r 1!�al,aa� !�1a63l4-j for h ill CM the 111.L'l4 ka)iin Ier.,1c i drw in kalaoa 5th Ahupw s 11 trja s mid to 131 Star%- %hath you and Ictkc. T1'la nN L,4ijWiwi mg aj ibther CIA in Holualkm i1"You are intorestvd in cor illiiig un 6,ulli=l rirn-aicv,~E ttl ih;a pwj vi ares kmdi•. I'lc. ti %tie the anulwd CIA aortturtatidn rexlttt+rt fair lan& If I10]Ualda IstL Norlh Rolm rlf V..W %Mji� V011l:n,m h.is inibn%nutimi rrgardin,g pim nrongoing cushuralrrulict%in Ilolimloa lel vont wl rnh:Itr :orwult. \Iah,tho Noi I.AK�, Uh:nn. U. E icaLt. SIA Ls -ni(w ; ivhuenl.)gi%f Scientific 1..011SUILMI ;Services. Tnw. %If}R't) }t -W)fA 1337 &Aji0Ajrm 13outoLwd Smie 11511 I-4irw:ledu Hl %21.1 ILO%a—i le.fand t)Mvc. 11) Bv,1 I J' kt-a'rar. Jig 96749 9 Richard'Y4lltM4"ck It Io—NlI9 1%',M11It Iht<C-1,1ak' Iti14I :Y.1„c:G t1 'ustutdIN nrg ,a ti_ L.. < l r,7 IR 1; I`Irr aIIvI i►'allw 4114, :r�.lk10-3'-3115951-.ill(r411, siIit1 -311` d M d I'"t n—%, iY>tlrxt.3i 'ti' )III 1 31x', 111111 ti41II 3111L1 ALV, 111k.-HICill on *6.122_ Avi-r% cof Land 111 Heolluilikm i' AIItlpinl'a4. Kai Iilll Komi. N,H'lll t' oink ISa+tlivl. Ilaws 1i'i Iwla ud IPortirn11s41fTMIKt (3) 6-4121:1116 .i i1LI 411 ;Iw 11'.}�. AIIMit c dti+ half49. Al �[S,.I' 1',:4ILLL'.i. '`OC'I11111L: C117' - i: I I. i I I I SLr%ive,. In4[, 4:iCso ccmdut:led u 4!11,`. ill purr11101 >'w dl -LIuas ILn:atUd .1 1 W111 III, ;'k l 1i Ikli6ll"C'tid III 111%' ` 11t1I%'4:l II%':ItII110 +11 r1-1sr Iti1t4:1 ICII-4111 (Frltlsre Illrmigh hgav .*t. I lic ,t.,Lli %, 11, L. 1 -', WICA 11' :DICT -1!', L :,l'tiu11 e puhliti 0,1111r11011l • :A IIIIII lLC11 In rc, �inv Io the I uft I ntlroIlI11oou I OWA). In. r.imt1ikr rhii rclion n,idrei,cs C+art'rLIPIoo, dvil rjlL7 N -A '.IIIui .•r, 1.' 'I,it+14.21' u,,11C1# vomitome d wa11ITIn Ihu 11ra1tvt urea did rlllti abldrem lhk: crltit4 prn,ji:621 '1rd:1 ,1nd °11,11 rhoc I • an an4 1cm lohtrl Aide ""thin The pro[vet Wren that 31Gtti Mo uIviii'dod Ill 111c MILAl%`5 MlivrI +4t'Ot,u4'nllitr Call Stuthr% 'I here w%.cra Ihree !Imharod +'+wr6::1ro ,11i dccL. condw led 11ithrn the 1 F,1L lwt'iCVI Ire -.1 I I[ic»r �t IL-1,2111or% I Ihioi: Ot 11 I.ii nd, ofilie 1}L 1311"4_I al rrs vv1c r4 :rf''l X741,, .' I.. ,Irl Al"�� � � t �: I.!cTcrt_yb% I laYt1L4lmil 4:l al. 1 11110 2) i ,cc I It',.11tic -I "11.14.14 I �I, �d'IrL: 4•.1.11Iei,I, :• i . . + UL1111111 CI1C ra+'rrI114'rim 114irfinr'I of Ili,; I!:1+r1rIr.1IL 41 II i I'�LQ) AIS' lrruslt'0 ,lr4:i 11',4 _%IN •Ira1', urLrnn11ulwwd ie+r OIJ a ros of 1,511d 11.111110 Ills :L11r4'111 111'.1IOCG djFCa1 I1K,VLI4 1 174I44elL l #,711 ILI 'IMI IC,, -I tL1.4 147 :10 meter,-.) iIT1I51 I MIK I 'I1 ?-r- 1-: 1 Olr• MKl 111?1. 1't�c alerr•i 1wltlun the '. , ,i .- . rL,I of the I:'ll' rr4+ico LIIt111 l44'r4' m,i: niC"I114IC°.I 11 0tI; Af8 stt11It UKL 4'IiIIrC' 11r"4}j1;1C!l JFVV WIS gltp,"10.1 1011 lydtl%+3111a u sumo%% and tmvi ll om .nOmmilopiuml ous mu1L� rv,:orklod III the AIS mp/:xl I lurra wav Im Wiwi Itd i1iftu d in Ileal Stud,,. 11t; AIS rujui rIVi1C7t1I1i14'IL4,IW nu furdwr "Orrk ai ;Ill "I sili:N, f yew' .: .:rr ..^r y y.; .r•_,. 1. .•.. _., i r.y;-.,..! y..._.• • ....Y .. •r.... . . ».r ... ,... 1 .�.".. 1 �. r-.' 1' ...., 1` 11gure 1: K-swn ; �Mpr ofllavv(Wi Ix1ni]d ahol%iag lAwatim of NIX -1 ,Ana rNmfi nal Lhmpraphic Top i*. 21763. Dam ';Axir4:4 %atitwial (iow+eraphic Stxiu•!4- VSGS). ipA'NAi1 N • 1�',r'Hi Ald F1 �1 f1'F-1 - 4 — - r a e y urwu. - �- '. . � .... r3pr. a .: �.` r ± '•. �._ , . r. � I f yew' .: .:rr ..^r y y.; .r•_,. 1. .•.. _., i r.y;-.,..! y..._.• • ....Y .. •r.... . . ».r ... ,... 1 .�.".. 1 �. r-.' 1' ...., 1` 11gure 1: K-swn ; �Mpr ofllavv(Wi Ix1ni]d ahol%iag lAwatim of NIX -1 ,Ana rNmfi nal Lhmpraphic Top i*. 21763. Dam ';Axir4:4 %atitwial (iow+eraphic Stxiu•!4- VSGS). �kj x. I.lKqlm 2: -,-"d 11A, r 1+•? �].q•\fl,ia.711�:—X;m?li d Pi [w. Uma k— -.Aud. F. k L :1) 13. Gala S wkkre.ti },'.ION. 11 MIA- Aria. 11,Aijmh,m. Nollik, I kIjl"p mt.. .I TI'Al m N r1-M. 36F 3 lihmgt It -I L iflhLV- l'+:{ S! Ani A L Al IN17 Fitkift C Nark- I zll ..S I U.ir Sho, ii, , ' k — i-, "Uhl — Rgpert arid 4ua, 1­,aLLkki,;L ','wLd. US RI. --"Jl ). Ug.j %.jjj->qj L re- h c SDC62n. sus I. I AE ih,� regtwsl of the Stain HLst&ic Presen'stion Dkiston (SI1pDX additio'rsal d;-,ctvuQrlttltio r of Sitz% M 11. 10612. 10011, 10049. recorded in lit, MarnmXt C! al- � 1992) NIS r wri. 4117.? MlTnitled tail 41'11"D in s levor reporl (Haalanusirt and Shidela 2('ltF7) The F-I.trnmati Ind g2rW)7) I,vtirr repwlrt quoied flit! MS rt:calnkl'1};:Itdation Ihm -all ,urfa a this in 11k arca vrcr,2 docarnoniLd" in tho .Irk; ro porl and thzrt `siSmIh7nrd material l'riaaa tho suadi nr,!a ha% h,cn r"overegl and lh:tt tatrther ir1ti:%itti`:rIWT) i%ou!I # I, of mininnon riltoductivity" (Ilaxnninallt and Shldolor 1007:11 ) lit-tw•"ur- the aaullnas, •-LL�,�o`,t d tI' 11 Iletin lo l'utim, reikk%%id of the it4_'io_ they Aimild be relocal�-,d tea kcitmeol lheir !urfew eoilblitl,.saa .Ln,t ILS tarttiltl %ItC?: ILI prevailing Slil*t] II, N1un ditrAk Iii .k l.'Mr lis ih41 Crtlmty or Hil w•an-i 1XP;Irtivwnt LSI PILamina dal,.d IaLI% 34'1_ —4l18- (IAj. %LL 'ill K.00878 11u., No 211121 WK7M), L"U'l,l N41L",,d 1 scaind .AIN wCIILI,w of th.. Hltimm[1t1. tat al. (191)2) project. area to idenlily nil nrClmo:olar ILJI prk,p<rti , pr,!-, _ mid to LapJaw pra mu; arAa coloileal dacurnantaition to itte'ILI& It,: lsl.trl, Mill mt,; ti, tundancs Mid MM III)IIACtOd h4 110100,1.018, pholoL nq s of all �a(�N Lnd l,241LI •-. IM.La;,:.%tal,.M 01 theta Inikgrdy. and Ili: si gill f.LLmla' k - IS'I'S %I;vmpI0cJ a %4%:kknd AIS ►tttijy OIL 76 1-1 ,,:r: • • I' it. IrI. rt.1 .iI..Y !'I Mlli.: (1) 7 -ti - 021'f)16.1)17 (poc 1. 01 8, and 0191 (F:;i otl and Ews,;, t rl.i_.1. -Its .r It -alb rrld wuhirliltkLd .I dI';IIt LIS [,:11, Ill a,I %II['D IEsr tdVW%e A111M —31 Ihc ICIli'it IlkILILIC,I ,I kII k tl a1.r., ill rli: !t!;xrtl uxm I. lnwr I I'thk: I* 'k IIIas ovi atrva. lite em ire pmjecl atrem v,aL% SLA-I[L-ECLI to S IFY'aiw41rW11 :�I!li��!v "4c°'r�ILlrv'al �+I IIIc- ILLi'1111 Yrtlt t�a.tii.�tttilo LJ.rililickl .Irk.�iatnva111t�a:,Ll tiI[�-, t�crr Ikw�a[rLl (Figure 5). I WO nal i.11 131`010110 l'k' dui uillcnlcLl wWr5. ilsaL: ll -oto :ind Site reIoeved II SUS rMIe ri atui-J hrL11 Yarl, milirLllkK pipe %iie- farmer lam,ii 51ie 'Illrtl _ r.Y,Lalaiiwd limiak thii were Tvini tred kill-pitLloo all [L)93. 11W 101111 rxrrt:L"UIPL; III CLI.1IDISLIL1LijII1k7aLL,.:d ti31l, ihlk:, 1001';. 1011tI ifXd49.:Ilia 101)71) Lt,M AtsilLluAAinial' tar 1.11V SCS IwIdLwork acid as, ko:kiLiu ,L, qIii, %LLQ', .U%: Ili laLl�:'L ar~'x411 on the g1'L}IIIld surtilua, fhr.:"' 519t:V30LM4 . w1kio tr1nciiled -o.:i vi 7e :11,wxa tltk nracnilt.•it... 1110 dilt1y' a portio+) 01"tlL? rails'uA licruk {Stir _10592), a % unrl MI'Lc slwd ctl,:IcsuLv (SLtL: 311:11 l..vkLl %� kkaU1 rLLa7 ll Lw"u11 {SiIC :1 I s121k I }lu'r4 3t'k Ce r1V rvinarriv% of Li Asiana 111 thk: rrLjceL 1Wj_ 1 IIIII'd .114 41.c -Ml LIri Ll F'gWC1 201X, w I: d I• tdv -,,A) wax t,sm4ucwd in the 5.0 SLv, r:�>La;1L,,,•,;L.-sll,, iiia1)FA VJVjk:LtU,;;lII`tlkw 0)7-G-L12I017Cpur.)ldiALLt.s,riotprv%lowly gIlL41Wa Iliv +lrfir. I,1-^,tik.A &" Wa: wuh'""1446 in a 1'+cr':':thu i'U(vt;l- aril moll%- tiro tuvluwvlogi�.11 :,oi:uhural 6:ompi, an,l ttirrtii:45 &,ocirlletl Lk irll piv.1"511l.rkh rro thriativ,IL 0arIV 'J^. l I „II IL I .JA IYI i li ,j- ' I , Llrllre y�'Cr'YII rriY l�,'IL, r,'I [I 44111 L'"i and C01k'I`Yrlte", 3r ID%w ' 'I. .111 I !111 .i Ir• I' , 1 I'I- r,s Ill Yaad 9'711 LL LiY: •+ai L�)l;IIlalcrstWal III Ow I.I I'f&,l : -1 :' :.11 7,.1 1. I',. k.A-•I •Iltt AW ruiInIad K,rin. `I7km, were no %"1174ia: I ., ",ai'Its In III jr. .1. I v ., .rYlarrr,+urra � �� 3,rAt IHI!lkac •Ia31LF ,,p n p iW'Y i4'IYY YIiJ!'U. �r 11 �� IrW AAA , ,.xr•l#Ir rtilMl�,,rryi_di f r, Gn :rra Y.lipi .. Ohl N P'.Ih 44411 � k 1'ifun• 5! 7.5-g lPYt111 1 rc l S't.a, 1.,p000lu: %Lhp Sho N3i l: t " itiuAY 0f.V�ha,, l -.II `.Ci" 111. l'I, ..-; '..:.I I •k "II, I %I11W.N6 K111111t3:611e.; I I I IA4I1 akl 4!Illl h KEN' ,Y It, kkw% ik 5k 40 M hp up TF Irl -k .dMo I I NMI EMIL.Aye I I k %I IF IrR.111 I Ill 1411,1 13 �V_�kj I R' f.. � " - '11 1 1 11OL' 41 f I 1' "L I4+ I I - I- 1LI.I Fal -Iv � 1, 1 L " k - " 011 �- I - " I I:- -V - - 1 1 1 'f. Ii .,. - A: --;I A I 1 '4 K.] I I1 -IE LISGS FOdrace fur a Mr''r^1:I,Ina C.'ngrRe (1 zhula F1,9fun} A �, r 46.`lW, ZI-.41 : r .'--;,Wia ln'a1r'ic,) iq a 1.I"il". vvr7- ri aigk rX1[1j.Sy' on a ship, Ili 1';131111 it".' 1.'I '-,' I,,,,I I':I . 11 . .I•FIT!Ce SR11f5 ..,.I11}k tlrkl lali %lr.til il I%1 71"� rl ti:overiltgllictn ,tillh I .41 II ]I I.. I . .. I :I•. ,4, 11'1111.111) Itibrl."tfing,, Illy yU11,114k 11r rll.: coamc! wills gTa,.. ;!. ped in II. .i,r,. •.. s ,,:z, very smixah and Aithow humps hti 1111" 1114111tH of c11o1.II:.I.'lii:M I11,: I..I .I I:- of P'Ir4ne, ;our -, om 13:1wa1.1 is4niul appear w, tiro Suairlll snwq-111 4, II:n - ! I 1:tiitll cohbL s unci houldem Th, range in %%idth from Ii 1ti*1_"t n,nr the 11,jp. ar 5htrl I11,, ImI mi11„I , I a Gtl In tikichIt tk41 ber C1,-vum Me �IliiF e 111, I:1Is! 1 nII1, r-Ill„x.:11 tl"L11t1 Ih'.: L`I I`"w a1AIn1 lined the vdt ,% of!$1.c �:7ltllhv In %onli: arc�ttr ttliL!f, IIl 111: gtlllncl ctlrl:L,C •.I J j_ th;`} 14•vru, tiller] Iati'.I tiii ruoL instrrrh ,:ANOI 1111 .,ul;t WuI:'.'4 „1 l•. •I,:T%,%t ­rl, IAlu,.';• rll.:' Ilgllcgss it, 11,"Yuld appear, w walk rxtendi.ng err �I1 HIL: r11II11,1 :cll..t. I n_ I. It 4.Iri`u., •,I IIIA I ;;r:: I +t:ri III Sh %Aaus, sr'rrc no[ Lr13nslrucled 11,1tif; 111 ti16: ti irr I; Irr +',1 a Illll .t ..• ",:(' •..,r•r..i •kdw ridem otic t ras,:hod REYudst °i ill, :111 I1:II.x 11:l ttiltl: Ok! ;a•l;' ., ._.,;Ir'.,,' +I :1- II,6%:•,..ulI1 tia'r1 Str.lighl mad not lin it %%0 7;1,1, 11,!I.k ?lid[ 44 :ILII=_I 0.11,11: :, 11, Illl_rl': 'til'1,.,41t 1111LIIi to rld.�j1 11 SM wlw_ I %illCll1C 1i -1 d '_I :1.r 1!..-1 ,,•inLIC 1''L.CLcll M I I-'e1u-!911.2 1' .11xC I'd VIL1 U.C., Iz 1,.t%,:Il 1111 the ef;lrr72u1 A11111 1IOILI:110., I::,I,I.t1Cd .lo- _'ltlJ)I �Itd :,LkIL.L , I`.II- LL! u, 4 .1.t,- ..e+,S I)% the Udllaho;I Illll '.1.,:11+IG: •.I Il 111', III, c.: IK it ii.+;�fr.I I1ilF.4 „I1 rllr., SII ^+ylr, 11.k'I 5I.:1,'+ilr YL,I�a IY► yYlllllg • 11CI'.' ill [ILS ;'II A!. II -1ILUI.1� 1111 1161 Jll I11 Lhe I lata l: 014111- 1t.It11 t1..Itltltll 111111w1 slide llitif lFtl'v''01'w rllrotig 1 the nc,1 ll,i wul_ 11t,tmligh tour Irr:+11r:,S% it I l,lal.1llal ltllt” !111.1.114 5, %I %v 11.,1t1a1 u'Llu.'Mi. liklol,%-,+I-1.1.11.-11.,111x-11tde' 1 `Meir Ul p ,if 1.111.1 Ill Ii 11I•,I .11M I:�liclu nc,f>,IIc .s, "l), Allclickil I11,Iclah"l 1r:111' (1'I«ul"t 7) 11 is enk:lear if Ihr rnrrllwrt.'.t,, ,1 I,i tII. t .Illjrr .1.a .I hrYilrir 4aMn-%4 14 tl;36c{I ;rill I1r.lI IrAlI.1111 OF 1,11711' .IIIIIJ 1111 „1Ill lIWI1 Ilic[i I• Ta,, all"llriwilted onil Iii,-Ion.:whiivul I.i-monpCIE111► CM :a1'L1WItitSlrt .Ik.11 lftldfwr .I4`31tribIlig i1 $114 ccl u7 lllt:. J0,,! JLMj OF 1.t! Ilt3ilsl4lltlt 11 afill Zs", Allea ku'a I114 Ir31a 111 [L'41xi;lllll till .11x1+11.1+Il_• it "liana in 1 I'Mmlloa V amid 2'.1 Atl,;"nlipiL •a 171 r4x luded In w1 M.:Il, t111NIS ht '1.11011 U K tlll`11(ditllliai (Slum 2N2) Mr. S11.11Y.: is auI .Iliu,?1111111 4 d Hawaiian culilw-W I' ir-aL.'4itloncr Ill `it .44:4a, Ill,: `tltllil!v of ,%IrL Sluoc)i &%,,riptiun ul' a1 "siblc fuilrnr ltral,:d un Ow Ii6luakr.l lain Inopunih rell,%%3, 'lltrr 11.4cililud nophoism 14 num, .,111 iitu lnoulltaltl.s x1.74.11'4" 1,•ulhai. /y[a'wt durr aril uli6oi 1114 rw:rrll}anla A >,4lial Wa, p,:rhapli, 11 gl,h= slits: bunt %%h1ch Lho arca gctx it. iicm 14 110ilcak?al. or dw lung Ar Ina %h& ­ V%, Ilt1"aG1iM1�fllilil'I I11' 1111$ ldresl PInndjIISI .1 11111.111 1111rtiilln Or illi IIllle. Irl ,111 Ad 1:1 AIM 11i,:Id behind tlut I'lrrlrrarfim f.rtl4Ma' CIl,111rt111.: III 1,+cn1.d jtL191 heltlrlw 111,::stalt,:, NO nue UU119' r itiepli en Ilhe e1a'i4Jetur°e q Mo'Adrr r>r dMV Vlirir:C ahertelt if Fr11n1 1111.E 1a1,i!Mi011 and from 1t]tnt %0 Lnuu rls-a11 11W 141lob III 1.11, itil:allII01'Aide 14.200 16A) 1 rMiMllte h 011, ,1 i,; i;:1 ii'. til:h� I IIILL I' II;,ti�- 11 7,:11 P, 11 GL 11.1 1;.: if c: ;�,:* OF 11WIT i11 lart0i, with a width r,rn;lilifl I'M1.1l 7h1rlr Iki Let L;in Ih,: .ir,:a , i :iii;- to var%. in- lk*W; titrl+uf;:hc�itt IIIc 411114 . I'=111S,: I�r[°Fr. iv nii, rarlte-r t,rirrl{reel •Ler%I,Ir1,� it i1, diffils:uh it, deterntim whetheli the sIi& hit,I 1.1 -ii is 1 o,1, i;lII, At tltl slili: Jtk n.:•crlrh�,,r .,r if ii tiG r ntlrrnl. el- elfgreafer imprrlrr,an,,w i.t Ideal Yhon, ury 1111 cdonl'7nploraty recewds njas arigin. rim n1(awe., ew whey, 4 ve i%,,d ra he used. I frwnd hosvek-or. Bear it Fens- rumored lig herve exJ v,4 amid Mi, herd err,' la da a sire insprrttma. Hut_ lhi, oral 11rai011A .11 the t�:lttnc % 6; tX14`It:1v o. itlISI Il tttlkl 1-i1, : amw tins . to p:fh17R ano.ir :v :t h:iIt 111-11 .,i kkI -iII r ,oar&, %alrlo Ili fomiILi it ulxrul L1i slick`. [SLI --i ?11112' 1 16.117 lWo AIS 411111 11,�N C,.;ly ILWIM orl th,, Mina trial si14 (L), il&-, Laid Rct.'Irlin.,n 2W14_ -we Hpim -1 4tift A) and on Ih L: t:ltliry Whia.l«u Inn pr,Tcr1}^ jI&:htntan '_I I I i ::; I Is,lIrk: 4 S(Lldr' 131: IbLr Iurmcr AIS bluttl iDosik-is visci R rclltnian 7{XA) L:c,rtxhwteJ Tur the f*r5hda.1ratl faatun: &--ermined that n in an 111 turtc crit rated (Sita I 1 hvii,d an Ili,: oriCIII idion and {.yl -1W silo: 111-L!J +N'1 Ifttitonil- vara rli hi. -41111 1111 I% kr tion,: nMj ilI lhi: l oltsnt: hwKJ un �Qwu ILal ion kt All Wild Wk: b% Nd -Iia t4C.IC 1'1--kkk 41, -ICI th+I1; :ljld 1%ivsed ern a 200-1 utter from the SWe of I Iwai •I 1itLrn,:% (---;ricrnl I -mid Tr-,n,l,.ar'taUon liiv kkon :tit11lYI6Y;ll'r}.I:L� Ilkw' liAlITIN 1Uld Icigal imitrrslklp of Ilyk wltil-W road 111,- Kcs-111D.ILL 4'ytll3) ;kM rcpst I prrlkar4d fill the entite 1161tialoa Inn 111Rpert'v° abo slid nae Woitltts _1114 ,:two r'clalctl In a , c4Iut'ka ( 11,-,t1re ti ) 191.• Illatrii c:111 I,):lil roil. '.-[7111 4.Its '6wa11killed OkLsilvl, i I+! '.s:.ILlrr;.lki 241l:-41 110MC1:11 %1.11t1:11ilkk.tlt Ilil,O)"AN Mid 111:11ALLl R"LKI +.I`11,1u'� `ik "PfI' ,,LL I '-111::k! -III rL 11 rhri tcl'l 1lr:Li•;Iu.uh11 11,r� ri Ilwtlllrl' .d s;lltl.l•,:.1r;„I: 'urn ale;In. 1,i II , rr1 a1 I I; ,L'.: I .r L; .;J.1Yihrm. 1b4 Llai"W-1 51,1,1, l.LW.'ti IS II'll 1111[11d lir 151,1.6.,- d -w, I111I Ir:l4,- .1 IILL1 Iti-k'lri."h, :hlt�l tti YY+�I `s•hlintt1,6, .Lr ktilrlld 1k: 1;\11,rdt:d 11' Illw AIQ elle r117Y.1'.11, ,11 ., ..,O,' C1 >flhi.� iI 151 The 1111,{111 ,sl IIIc r,iud 1..111 d 1 oiiic1,.11 I v.ItvS ",': �� '41:1,1 I h !.':.I 1, Ir, I-1 7~rr Rlls ,:. Il!F I I� trr.So`7I k i}t thl' LrJ4il ti Oil the,°LI Llt lees{ 1 J.5 16tf I i )4 -YI i', .;I I'.I I+i L'111r11.Iu �+'Ik I -J °I �,. OU; il.,J, , Alk 11111W.: Iheroad ak'crJtlr,d1IIII}1:tu'rIItIicq,Iit I11:,t:111" Ir.'I,L•I'It.',I,Ir4-Sl ':14'k.cdFixk.tyaIi,,%I:II_.-I=111, COM IilI itt plat.�tS. 1'1!11: "AI tlil:l+1111101,111 I♦ ,II1h11_1I t-.; 11i"tu8 I. 10 1 11L1'La ally 1tkr1Nlim. Lw4; .L 11. 11 lislowlc :i,a I'1xtds, I ivil mi9 bourld.atws, garll.n,- ..nil , ill 1,: IF:1•tua :.. h,1 NVUMLIM ti..-MiLllL>i1s iii ll1HL,11711: ROXI S11.” 24211 1- :11 111..1.1:ini RO-ad., thllikltlt.. 11 tt1'I,1 111 haiv voillirtl.od uzsl arils a trail 1i+ %%n esu ,z I '_' .....II LIrc 9 awd I i6vr: It11, I11.: %A-oItm tt:l'1t1111us of that trail k .11 LI 11,FItltS%ILJ111 tr:ll1 110.0 Ill LMlt 111 t}14 Ill, y Prt7lliMIL UNd. Illtr,' ai,,:Iter wk., L? 010-k,U 11'X1, I. 111,`,1 k troll:; t}1,11 It' ilia n1}11h ILH11h1 Mill I�r'r' F1gure q iimt l`,`Wjtr4 II}t 1116 ',,srltll,.:1 'nul'i Mid jm,;.,L, y, ni'I, I Ilei I]II A pri11Wart atW.1, Iliz morthon trail i T1IIn1.a6S J1 like ralltlllt,l 1+illtk .11,1111' Il'C ,'it IFIL, I . ;.I ;-,ry 1tf thy+ 171' % projed arca I`Ila 1Xvel rnOrr1rttl hemi wL.^i aIN0 U!I6l ,: .1 1• rt.1, 11,001 1 ',11, .r;inn iravA IRA 11 H1, .0 Mir A. ti on 0 SITE 24211 t I I SUOR I C ROAD no, U, 7'r 1—tv 114P 0— '41,41 Top, L1 27) -lot 6 tAM. LE PhO&O. 1 Figure 8: HiNiunlaa Ion PrnperlyMap Sho%ingUwmwnsaf Site 24211 Milafic R,%,tdttnd ATOwalngical ' ilio Dutmu-mr;A m 1b,! kcvWaun i201 I�AIS mp-sil (Ruhtm= 2013,23) TM In rl YW,• hit iTT %kniilti Ncn, r. T--, r,,,rii, Lp r. 0' 1 r I—d L"al W., 1.1AL Ml I S-- ! -A-La. w Flowt, I III Vorl-- PON Mm. I ,I Iqm-ll, Qr.yel 11+b •A P, %,I,NAM I . ...... 1, Ix m7 N �A. 177 ..� . SRI! i4tF:a3r".-6??+k�hllga.539rvs°m t]nQlnldunni5itr^_1'1iHi�;tare;Read, HeN,,VncLtuicL 14 + I'ituar 12: k+74 tir�r, ti flan Awf I nwer {V1'eOcm} I'nrl.mjj ., ;rre 7,.-121 1 HPileww R.md -wd Kejlwsw 1161046M 411(14110 RW41III U3141-A11iwu{I 15 E I JMr to-. }I'��,t41Y• !{_�: I�pli� �.I It°a ,�ti.. !'I.ci„1 i. r+17,-rtl.j-'�ni� �'1 n4',�I �d�. _ �.-! I i... �� t F� ,. ,..!i� Ik4. � ". rpt •'*., awl I is r A P ..k L aT 4 E I JMr to-. }I'��,t41Y• !{_�: I�pli� �.I It°a ,�ti.. !'I.ci„1 i. r+17,-rtl.j-'�ni� �'1 n4',�I �d�. _ �.-! I i... �� t F� ,. ,..!i� FWc 15: PhuiRmp) d',Int Z�'l 1: 1 (,. i rFcycri �:,rx7nc-',nqzr, LwkmT-xiR llcrzilrwi !Ulk24). abler Lira ;avoral wa1lM&-lis said eDm, Is or LhL, DEA projec-1 tea. 4ouzh of the trail termri11a. that are not related t.n the trail (see Figiir� : .,nd Tigilre TA The. easic' F1 Lila: 4 pwr nllel Sv:L1ls. Site 30595 alit] 4iie .114"1 ;are thti ttc;t ',il!` 'If 111c TAIM.•tai helm Iiidi,:ating they Wffe No It Md W,.-d Aft el' Ilea I.Mla.,II Lir ifiv r.Iilroad kiLmL fhe walls are stacked- III-fwc!d_ and mye r *hl, cora fslIM ir. r'4 -,mlilarTo I I i -;I aric cra wnII%d c1Lme»iM in. 11thJer pl:lees 1,19 Il1L". Wand of Hawaii Them: I t1m'Ely+ykxiih erm-s %%alk th-!L 1v, I the spaec MWOOn 16, parallel 3w^al I.- FillAy- [Ile S,rl]linll NDl4aL% IWIN1etAl 11tr 'Wallti IS 1111310. 11 ILpind with natural o+i+.,gwAll.-rurmed level ierracei, and L-L dotled Lk1lh bedrock 1,u1_I,•;, 411.1 lokW -Ibo unl4 uill_I pfirllll'A %v[IIK 1r1 ithill the Airrom DV .k pruj"rt etau Lire Si I, I I I~,'_'. I-tm1Lw,1 a juin I-calurL' i 1% ,11, I{1citted 111 the nrlrthL'm and nomheaxlr:rrl porr,�i+. f I",, 1 -r, -i .I area- m4 r a - m4 I:t-urc 1A1 -.,I~ I 1' 311..1 C ,1rtTillk �4i1111 .144;Ir1. 1 4 .1. p +601 ,Lnarded to .1ohn U. Munn (Figure 161. 11!, , I. %%, - !J,eJ l;1 4,1111111 i.l jkI'.I1 :.tC'FYL1441 ltL ;IL.- i'Ir.^I,r: 111 1112% 1,1.p S.LI1. 1111. i''uarun Z 1ti WA 1"'W1LI.IP 14.Lll amd k cAurc 3 i, talc nortllp m l_L"_l lr "rid lr'v uaIL '111 tti C91;rn CL1J _ ,ALJrC 3 ..i, I',� �i.,rtll hviol, t t .4s.4',k1ll raukh Arld thele Ilr d f a� Ih t.l,e I i:itll: %%AlI .I( t]ll4 Ii itic 1,.,r:,IIx1 s. IL', I,,ILL IiJtiJ.. a ,`�,.�`�:;. Lui1r,C. 1110 L=+,,rlTtir 11OLJILI [II tA% iL]tLF .L IAI,^,c `-:'•L11j1. 45' I,I.11 F', :I I7 tltr l,E;L 14'';L't"':A 10. ` 111'4 ?.4iLI:IlsCii �''L III•.9i,,rt'1. 11e,I1lJ-IL5 41:.L4r I F,:Akl l� M1 44:Lti aI`flr LI, -L-LuIIt111I'd Itl all �Iti rety,,I, i I), it.,, ,71 ,I. . f' 1 �; i � rliLkLil lt.`,+ 4M, i1ti11i 1194 I'1 "I ,: i r, .i�',I�7... ri1 t., The not lIl;..t' T 1)..'411I11m % Lsr IIIc D1'. I'il, i•.a"I .11 CII `, 1 II•,ii 1 :•Liid L ), I lie 131!1. LI .Li l 1 1evort yr!1.LIll IL IWLI I I'p 11:Lduu% 110~0-33 i4 .i,, I.IIIII.IIIg Lvid (1.w LU h11nt1ki'M 44AII Ihere u is II., +I.r+1'r�4r m Irad ,Ir4• ILh'111111;L1 Ji�1111}.', IuIt MI LJ1l1 Itlere ara llo sul1:L a t't.1t111'e,, 44 IIItII III- I lI l [If 11,L4r .Lr .;a 111,41 111e 2a11ek1aLvll x1111 a hirfJ'ro or troll. Mlle gilrwvJ 1plttl'L11a 44WLIIL tilt I)I..i rILe,10d JJ:1 LS L-11-:VelL xttpprll 41301 1131111ral stvLif ipva1Iti-f1m11q< i IuVeI I6'xr;IL:c,_ ::r„I I, d,I111% 111111 JIIV JKPIN:l 010,;tiil,ti MINI 111. WC t++,p11.k-T- 11W suI f k�L; I'L;.i11um Lit a b6di'ma vo0LIId 11e `�IWNI.II11;.11„ p.'"I%LhUFW t) f a IaJ Jg .LL11! 41111•: srLlIaL1111 }!LCII.L1+:LJ s,uIt,.I: ul kLobslca and P,.'111les (!pill Wk)Uld L.° aruist moth OIL! unevr1'1 tufpLpg4pli% 111 Ow 1111`jLvl y ULI :LIILI 99 Uld 1,V, LIM 4JSV Iu S&nti.fv. '16;sk; ary I.w s;uc'h wrliwc 111r1M If:.: DIA I,nq_,k`L arv;I. 19 • I � T N 1 E s �',..°e } • �.'N'h�A, � � •� ti ' y 4 by 1 Yh �,.. , y ,. A4 ,. ., , .•5 .y 1 A•9T .. - � •.rte �. 4,_�i..., •li:".11le .^Au17t�[.�i(iti 75.1, ,I�Iii. \I,,i:. till •. I,il�. it ..I .ru'�. �.,i�, .., �, 5�...N'I�.I P'Ii��nl�T,-�IIJ 17nm �'.'.��'A i.t li m i. A ii_ .urq q�; K�Tt+'. a4N)1, l.�'_91.y1-,'b u_e ljtt.wi 414 MLsllr-- 1'.dl•:.I it � iV,,Y.1.771FU1.. ti.P•. wsx. I. \f ,rtl 2n Rel POIl sr UP DVA U4111111 MIS I -,well thtrrf!e 11CC lFf St llrrf a Vial lira F 1.1 j. o 4 r k -% III i."- ':-ir I 11 , "Y'F"'I'I- .111 Form T72dm"'$aim. :Old .`...r ... r; --. i . 'e%1 r31ti'T]f'Is (noiab 1.% AT11"mev Sfr.11l, 1,.".' ill I, Ill. J ifihriil.�, thi: DFA i—r! "I:,1" l,° ITII 1Jnd rh rT11k%C,T poriolls of II . Irl rr:rl fIami-d-, of Wnir 111411. I11illJilwll7 n w11 1talk ihall %ILYt nail identi.11„I .I 11;1 .I II° 11.. .rrcihn,.-cliigiofl-4hidios. It afWnrr Ilk mtipon&m.; _rn referl•tlw, I., w IL 1 ., hurt .1 walk which arc Lk:A =.AFi[.11lulL,mdl7rv+w afls- (hie of Ili, Dl'-"pondcw- r .1 .1 .; membo -rt tk- Kona k ifil : :L+.1,1L17 K"aril, ciialtuotcd kIr 16,riw1:. - .1 , ; lr11 isllh.l i Ir', it I I .•-.L lul} 1. -1119 To tial, ;ghoul Ille 1113lualtsa hriimj 0111,1"0 1110 11fIr.I..-. 1, 1 . 11.11 1 I;.1.'r! 1.t I'I. Taxkllt 1_1149 1114 wlriml* arc ixift utusiTicali%nlx t-11woon Turn !IOidir kok . 111-.1 I . I . ...,:Lr1 nlirrsh:r N111 J0,N rs1u1 411,1, Lha .1mrul 41iddregs kir r'.l'I name of ;I1 :'1'cY , •p 1 '1 .11 1 In 117x: ,"I I, r,r4rw, 1.) "1111 •L1,`Rrt in A 111,_ hclL;:1 1 r11, I a; lrnl jr 11 d h:r., r,,., -:,1: 1 , .il ~gild' .nr..l : 4 ;111.-1 +,.,1;, r•.ILhin lire (•C., 4,1 4 �t 41� Il .Ir.L. pgyN,Ihir," 461,: .� I :ti. I',.LI[u% 2 aj11 ,L t"�,LI kLf: .` ',' .;11* 4~-IIrih ANCA 5..1•I. hu1lII41�r•, ,.1 I. . I'r1 i,mlti"'_ Mr. SL1.rrc, ema11 aczuraic I1'I+,11'11.111. 1I a +11 .,'11111 Lii, imlULral .LI111, 11 L1YSi.0 OrIltc 1071"Il Alld I Ch Ull1; IC k`'-Il„IY+`, Ilrw ._••.k -1 ..I.,I,j kl ah..l ll_,' IIk.Ji 4S1Ll.Sti1 111:'11111 11,'14\401 Kti,IIIJ..,L 11' 1111, 1111 -1711 =1YJ K,:;1LJ11i1LJ IS, 11'_ a,?Ll[l 0i 1112M AT 1114,: „111r1s1 *.`, 44Lm fal.-1 1,t 1 l ^1 koll, 11una. '%'1r til 1114 w,.1l,nilt •I.`, '11, r, V: • ,kL% Mid I,lli_1;L1 III IlIkal l.tlrtiY VI :ti 11fA .4l J I1!. L-111111110611.1 11': ,.bLII LI ;IIILI t.,. l,'j :4.111 C2 iIkL4.l'..LY'05 41Llgr,lhw IIi60 iHILI Ill 111.: fW41r 0rJJ.AikI rcpwi Il-rmi! i'1 Il': 11,1 *.: . .aw 1,,1.`:;1,1 [il l: 111,111 1.11 k -m wot ,sl t17d111' s 1-Ykrjfti11 1 Auld illclt .il, NO I_1A 1311 1, `..LI `,h1dil ..r *.r,.IL'j'l l:t.:,I L"dt7ll or .l :Jr-.i1,:a 451111.t11 Ih4 171 1 111-,14-,.,1 1:i k ll : ,:'..r,"..:Ilii; .r1 .1. i. '••, %..11111.1. III..' 111 1. IWill i L atc-aI 14 as ,,•,._rI•.,1 t'S 11 t I,, I I 11111 1.1:11, 11111 111 kl: ti11 r1 Yv. .14 ,111'+.11-'-.:d lltl-r4w. 11+,'1.- 00 LILPU III1q!kltOd LM:GI '11.1.,15 IIS111.11 d.. .iti 11 Lilil .�1 I on, tlI" �1]'ZlS:lx,'.111ItFly .I.1-:+eLl-.:tl..l' Irl '-kips* 11 r'1'L If71., 4k,l.rr4S' 44111511, H., 1)l' 'k 111011, I nti;G flesiless, Al. 111,1 I? !��`.'llflls.lrl 2(M 1-4;. ' :'rit4"rrlr.r'L',trrr�r 'ill J 1i>':'rlth fri{:xe'lj)' t7f i�r.k9e� E'AN)h9lxF rx+fx!xCj r`. •. r•k ." ;•>,:, trr rr �� i thufmo'a Neirik Kona I li Ytrier- tilarpinj k: 'a hi'111.i I1 I 1 II.:II' Ielj- P:.`IrW 114 C-(12-1.4 prep uhd fair C'IUrt A, Otlthll_ Na L1.1 l lit: P f,7�•.r.IIn %taIIllr��l Ia,,.twItiILI II..Lwart and annum Peru LL- -1 eta IJI I.I .L r11,L 1'L}11ft rtilyll$M ,11,'I.I!LI 111Lkv Al'l 1linLN- A,. 1. i.k.r1, lr1 ;Lr 1,1 12 k<c hl inlln 2013 1±! L -hent,.'[•}?, 1' if '. '„ , 1•,M1 rJ: f'71, Lirrlrae:l, ;.,:,.rr: ''1.11,.. .. Ru. IiI.1-,L,1111..'11„uliju!Y .l& .11 RL••QX3 f', krT.:1.`.IC.;,.1 I•__rr I'dlVlyd itnpc 1. K.MIiL., kC}11fl. �CM1� '�,•xr r...�, ;r, ,• i.r1 � ,,.•' , !rrLk;:' RI',m,: r r;x � , 1, ,, ,�,. � 'r1 i€r5l�esrrP�.p+ J° -:'..i -'....'r. :Ir,.� r,;:l'�,•f•., r, fT,Jv +i ,.. r,;;� --.. �r, �".th� fel=1��-ri_'� I�if` pvopar,ij I,•I !"Una 1.11. k,1++.'II. 14 i. 1ioil,,I0LL ;t��{} . � ! . •F!, ILr iSr.',ryrl i'cr f fr1L°ekrW.rrL' �irrx�r.w• lfr�l't Ivr '�. f _'J : CG'r°4:� %rx�rNu,r1 x� NeSfr,crdr�,r � ° I. JrOil .+ , o:, ? )) krr;, x, rJ+xwru r twJ'crnr�. ffep1'eer'i I 1 A:� t?1--6- 1.-$)i- !'I:J lf.It [1,01iJ. IIt- U -C, SO; Pw” 23-10. 11'•tmolulm I €; mrtl,Ll-- I I I L. tk .I 1. 11,T. aliti T) tit 14hidelec {tJl�Ji .' I :dr:l� r,'� .;rrL ;+ ,`;,,, ,., , ;'Irtls+rr <r/P��«L�+IvuJdurr t,"f-u 1 "J,.d�rc! �'ur•i'lll�, ��wrll4i�iArll. r. it, 11 .,; '1. 1?61r..,n IneT ed by C'1ulhurraI Sura cl ik Ila%sii 1m the {1:1IL1 11 I [ irlt>ry"1 01111N Ii.11"' I " D I'd, -:11 1�Ic M111'I) i ihtan. kgM11cl 1111111 L A1. CII I[....L15d O.W Shiddo I tillil" ti�""11L1i'E '1i111Y1Jlll Ili a" };..... a ..I rr 'i+."."{ �o:, rt';!', Pk). P. :,xJ!:+ , JJL 7 .i 1'�I�.,'ilr ll+'J4:, ♦ � ....i i. :Ir'J'S ��!,'kni„i, -.. ,. ',, ^"A,. ,..�., i-. l`1 ('lllllll.•.I Y1114k\''b' ;251) 1 PL:,z,tn-id1: I':Iri11or`, I I iiI7.."I: .•111114 :tt1FtC Stil' PL11.111 \' Ik S I.II AIA M111 i %1001,.1111 19, .1 .;, :A,-. t.rxel.'.k,,,,rfrr11.J1, I hn'.E^1:11'. - 1 11.15%.171 1'I'.., 11, "Irr'11.A shmo- I ri W�M UL i C A-Ws:.l YI I s 11 Ilk Ilk 11.2d law ttu I 1�1 I I. j -,T ;KIIJJ! :1 1:11, 111 '1 1�11 I 11"VaS11. 01 111 JIUOIJI I III 11M�:111101 Ihc WqUkremLiniq Art,% iii SILWII;.21- 130111,11tilU Mari, Ashley From: Kurt White<tharnaskurt",hite�_Q)gmarl.crirrig Seal: Thursday, OdDber 08, 2021D 5.25 PM To- P'larwriing Intprnat Dail Subject: CQrrmLlrits an propowd Stib divisi-en Attachments: KVDeclaration re Traffic-rDn kv avuners.docx I i orrl all:;dwd. 1.1696 DE;CL111tt't"I'ION OF 1_ W1111'r., dcclare'. 1. i ani a resident of Sunset X'icw Terrace i_.ists subdivision 1. County sof IlawaiI, State of Hawaii, The proposed land develnftmcut project that is the subjecl nt the pending; Draft Fnviron ental', Ass ssinutrt submitted by, Royat vji jas Housing Nuie t Tax Map Kew biers. (3) 7-b-021:016, 7-6-021,017. 7-6- 021 -.0 18. -6-021;1118. aiid 7-6-0211-019 l ioi'th Kona District, f lcrwrri'i k[antl, Stint: of Ilawai`i affects me personally 4is waJI as ttlfcct� my inlerr�[ ire Mal pr'PCIIwr. l rasidc within —1 [arks of"the propowd land developr kilt priticct. In suds capacities. I leve funs sand kno"ledg,C 4-4, the i'oliowiyrp, I'licts .Tml i:ol1141 and would testify thereto ircalled upon to do sn, 1 l 11tttvroicwd thQ peading DRtAF I' I,N'IlMNMI N_[ Al. A")I,&,SSNJEN'1_ tncludmg the'I raffic lnipirw l Analysis Repoi t hy SSFM InteroatOnal, dated July ?0_?0 r11•111 attachcd as Appendix ? two the DR.V "l LNVIRONMI;,N] AI ASSIµ;;S'YtFNI`, I gun sPc,:itkally concemod aboul adverse trait-ic impacts ImLh within and wuithout the [zona Vistas subdivision (IiA are not fully or accurately addressed in the SSFM Trafk Irnpaet Analysis RL -purl. Traffic e)nd Ilic SSFM Traffic 1nipact AnaINsis Report. are [discussed in the holy of the DRAFT FAV IKi)Nk'IFA I A1_ A'_iSLSShtLNT_ at pp. 48-56.67 and 71. ;_ In Illi; Komi V Iws-I« I Ubiliw i.NME. ilio propcsed project relies on the use of a substandud roadway, Kekuana`ea Place. Kekuana`na Place is Eery steep. has limited sight distances dui to extrema curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact ofWcreascd traffic ariwinu from Pbaie I and Phase 2 buildouts of the Royal Vistas Housing Project is inadtxluatel_y aultlrL,�,sLcl krt the SSFM Tralfw Impact anal}•ms Deport, which fecuscs instead on impacts along Queen KaalttlTm-mu l lighway. l am particularly concerned that adding rttcr€rcrsaui VUhi+�1:= trips 10 aiul h -um ri separate qubdivisiprr will presunt dangers and wngestion to residents alc m Kekkiaiiaoa Place. f consider thart the Planning Dr-partmcnl should require the appllual)t to :i.ltlr ;d r:liese coricerns- 4. The DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT requires evaluatica of. arnong ��tlter's, ri�ltrr.3e" .kcMc{� �ie��r't it ipacts. such as [x1p rlativil c hrn qe.k oreffilc't,ti on t;tA;-(' Sc:c Chapter 11-200.1 -13. Hawaii Administrative Rules. Instead (if squarely addrassing lhcse tssk.kas. Jwk%,cvcr. [hc DRAFT E` VIILONW's I'Al ASSUSSMI EN1 7 simply ignores t ium, claiming thal "No adverse secondary eWcts are exrwett-ml since the developnient WOUld utilt-rc c x,istirtg infiriix, trtrc;ure, pFL) 4"iclC irtlill irckuSing, sttrcl is 1x01 exp+eet0d to r€.$ult in 5UhSt•antWI demands to C ounly smices," It i-; a scrious oniigsion for the DRAFT l NVIRONNMENT L ASSESSMENT to tiril to addr(,--4s the potential adverse. impactscel-' increasing, the use of wuhstarttiarcl oKis(iixg infrastructure. like Kcketanwoa Placc , The DRAFT C'tw;VIFLONMEh7'A.ls _ SSESSME''T akddresses ad -"c -r o trsri'fic: impacts -Oil]y irk the Zontext of Whether the project would Havv u substantial tuiveise effort on prahlic health. The; Applicauit clairns, "I'ltc Pnc)posed Prc►jccl c+mould trot afFeel public health in any way, stormwater t twid Fte approprmiel , di u -used of ill drainaVe stnictureS. l•rAffie irnp gls have been taken lntn.careftal consideration ir, praiect design." Emphasis added. This hold conclusion does not address pcterttial adverse impacts as r�-,,quired by i }-:iltr r I i -2 CY) ! -1.;, l lawaii Administrative Rule s, 2 L), 'Ihe: Planning Mparlawnt should nut acccpt til` CRAFT EN-VIRGNMENTAL ASSESSMl N75 reliance net the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report, which hus the- fol lowing deficienci e's, a" failure to ackiress adverse traffic impacts Within the lona Vi' tas strhdk'ision arising riorn the project; h. The SSFM Traffic Impact Analygt5 Report uses a gm) wih rate or l %. in comma to the '&°U grow Ili rate c.yrrployml by the 2018 Wlwhet Eogincerin 'Traffic Impact Analysis RL-Porl. 1'rar is c1111Fcstion is %,c.ry sensitive Io growilt rata in a non-linear, � %purlvntial relation-, G. Traffic Impact Analysts Repoil doh ::,; nol 1IM11.1-guncrational housing churactcristIcs coninion in Hawaii according to census dxa i ti;rl likely undcresi'arlatcS daultr vohielu traps atinhutahle to huildout cif the: propt'iscd l}rtwju%21: d -Me SSFM Tcuftic• Impact Analysis Repan etuployw ,Asn unusually low vehicle volume of 853 Ychicics firr Northbound ween I,� 4a}1ur_1tLLIIU lli0ltWUY wi the s+. Qc:tvJ elute of April 31, 201 (1. a weekday and August 24. 21(014, a S,-Aurda4 . coniparml wilh the 2018 Wiwhcr Etwincering Traffic Impact Analysis Repoli, which reported 1057 vehicles ti."f J�wuay" '_4 and 15. 11.11 h, both weckda:�s. The: unusually Irw roported v0iidC VO! LIMC W S 5.1 11 Ise, Flt odds wil.h Figure 4 ofthe SSFM, Tratlic Impact Anaiysis RLEwort, ;%Iii4!; ►i IpI'LP'.i:11JtCJY 1050 vchide,; M hour in 2016 for Nonhhound Queen Kaahumanu Highway at 7 axi. T-lic cli ftBrmce in oltt.me is more than cinrrhle the maximum I tO,o variation generally ucepted in day -tri -da} nreasurenients and thus uaire] 1AIe. 4. Tl-ic rccommendation by SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report for a roundabout at Queen Kaahutmav Highway and Kualultti Read (North) is incxmsistunt with the traffic I Wrfidt)T IMM. ediOns that pass warrants bul rernain un.;Egnaliz d present trvRe sal'L'.�, ;Iahilily eoncems for the ;c v�:ltuttt;nt, r; The recornmcnd:,ation by SSFTM Traffic innpact Ajialy.,6 Report for t ionitoring ctl- 1lic intersection ofQucen Kaahumanu Higliway and Kuakinl l Highway is inadequate. 'Whore. as )Ln -c, elrl i 1 r,rseerion pas cK rt orc than one w'armatit under all conditions, it should bc privritir TF�r -rikl� .Mil Cicc IL111 of a Sigilal 100- This circumgL.mce gilt he exaccrhatcd hN' the Proposud Project. f. In wuni. the Drat Etivirortrnentat Assoistnvai wid SSFM Trufflic Impact Analysis Report LIOCe , 1101 Sltfl lcicot, k:rudihle facts and analysis such thal the ia{l+ft'me iillpaLts oll c�is[irti ; 1riEril.wtrUcturc and resultini,. t oni incremed tragic Lmn h4 fully uGatla:rshuxl and resull in '117I,1`al1riate go erlunem planning Mid ovsp >'t se, 1,1oclarc under pmalty of pc'iry that the f4egol1ig is truc. Dated: Kailua-Kona. Ilawai`i, 10 -OS -2020, 'h o 17 a.4 hJi i to Printud radnlcT"# on'las 1' 1111e Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec ConsufFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek t$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Th o n-icis White Via email: thomask_rt4 �,,tegmail.com ISE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Graft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Bear Mr. White: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEAD for the proposed project. Blease find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Anaiysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific cornments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment -2., In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies car) the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoca Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight diztances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koahumanu Highway. I cm particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Plcice. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuano'aa place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the some specilictatiors as all other Kona Vistas reads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana`oo Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of KekuonWoa Place to Royal 'Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuano'oa Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roua,�iIy one additional vehicle on Kekuana`oo Place every 4 rr7inutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2021 Mr. Tharnas White Page. 2 of 4 Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEQ. ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increosing the use of substantial exisfirig infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or Time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7, i of the EA. RegoFding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana`oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekouna'oo dace is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and FM peak hours, respecfively�. The traffic aralysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicont claims, „The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way,' sforrnwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful cansiderafion in project design.' Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chopter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and 'Reasons, ❑nd accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed alcove in the Body of the EA. QgMmgM : The Planning Deportment should not accept the DEM relionce on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kono Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a grawth rate of 1%. in contrast to the 29, growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDQT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Longe Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 20201 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got tin, our traffic engineers L,sec 1 T from the 2025.LRTP forecast. September 13, 2021 Mr. Tharnas White Page. 3 i'' .4 Commenf 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 1. It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with ttivo cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Instit[te of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook +.eras used and low-rise cnd raid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has o very law standard deviation and on R- squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best }projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8. The TIAR employs an unusually law vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kacahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repo 1 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for ,January 14 and 15, 2016, Moth weekdays. The unusually low reparied vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 201$ for Northbound Queen Kaohumanu Highwoy ❑t 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 1 0 variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDQT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Ko ahurnanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Road and Hualalai Road (north). Cour traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to t�)e 2016 HDQT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if I ne Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is unrl oir,ling, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers sirr7ilar to those f r,_)v7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kaahurmanu Highway and Hualaiai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns far the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Koahurnoru Highway and l uakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prcritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Resaonse 2: The Manual can Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCDj states, ,The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the lfkety increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and Bathers. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where September 13, 2021 Mr. Tharnas White Floge. 4 of 4 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project_ The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact rrtie at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mich le.lefebvre stantec.corr cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mon, Ashley From; Jiro )ohriscon <jjohnson4 4 outicok.eama Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2420 4:40 PM To- PlanniayJ IntemetMai I Cc: inabapacific@aol,cam, Diane Blaneett-Maddock subject: Royal Vistas Housing Project EA ramments Attachments: kv DKr'ratatioin re drainage-nQn kY o++ newrs.docx; KV Declaration re Traffic -non kv owners.docx Aloha, Attached are my submittals related to the subject. James H. Johnsen 76-157 Kamehamalu St, Kailua Kana, HI 96740-9937 908-326-4600 1.6968 I, James H. Johnson, declare: I I am a resident of Kana Vistas, TMK 3-7-G-026.012, County of HaWail, State of Hawaii. The proposed land development prajectthat is the subject aE the pendir'g C]rait Environmental fi&sessmtnt subrnItted by Royal Vistas HM151ng project Tax Map Key Nos. 13} 7-6-01 :(}16, 7.6-U21:017, 7-6-421-418, and 7-6-4121;419 North Kona Vlstrkl, Hawaii Island, Stare of Hawai'i affeets we personaily as well as affects my interest in real property_ J reside within 200it., comer of teikor- and Kemefruntoial St's. whkh is ane of two access streets of the prey Sed Jarred develaprrrent pro)ecr In such capacities, I have firsthand kwwledge Qfthe fullowing facts and could and would testi yr thereic it called upon to do so, ?. I Baro rcN item th%; pvrlding DRAFT FNVIRClNMLN'I'AI AY I-SSMI %' f nird atlac111utir1t , 1 .1111 �[:W ~itis lls C(Mccnicd aahe)rtl MLreaSrxl tra MIC. 1101 d1:,S1g1rec1 111 thc volume prtwws:wd, J,ry1llwr .4'_ P-rmt Lulto Ica .1h(' hcf. a d(}wnhrli gr";add imd c or°r es tra Jle Stop Sig it. .1iirrltilrf1' 'Wrt}, i0 lipe or-arF 17 yt'rrrs 011al I bit I,(- J;crr`c,, l Jrelr,cl iyh_sart��r�d t'C"IJicius cajnrrtt' to Codtvr"v Corlarr mmol: Church, FarrJexrrar"lirli` iv rlr 11,,e area, run the .Stofi .sign, ?. Thr; gtccp tarpog •ultihy, historical rapid stortrtiwater runt -off and associa Lod dsainaave pi`eseni hazard,%that me an dic Draft EuVircrcia11011al Assesstn,etrt, Secy I,l,. thervoIw 4. Additionally. I am aware Thal rhe druinc(ge arecr on West .Side vl CrrMin"s }; etcry pr open.. oollcels water front a lrat;ge area above- They addition r1f acres gfparenrcnr and I clocks Collecting water than l ayn "1 been adequaielY achirosed in the proposedpr'o),jert, resulfbig, in i.5suc--N edi rite way to the highway, aird tk'}'� ndr 5. In sum. the Draft En ironmcniarl Assrussme•nt does not tlisc;urss :sufficient f ,cls and anal, qis such that the necessary drainage impmmneals and diversioris can be understtwd. A proper cr•rlleronmental asst-qsrnetnt cannot leave meaniii&l details to be taken caro of in the itlCure. .E, 111"14 cr".srarcrt F1, ,srjch rirf,ar»rttances rt-atlld lead to un1w•04IProject s-�giaenlriceon, cfmull,.L, other errvrs. The applic•uxrr, in Me current lots remaining in Fiona i'hwa . has P-ve-n Jur-veil 1 ro build cr con cr'e re dlruim4e x_t'vem, disgrii-vel as a et -4711 with planar in,/rom, to rake care pf cury-cm drainage issues, Ibis news, area Ivolrld resi(h Crt r�ciclidlrrt�c7l.strstr�xrrs, G, A bare cotieL,,lon by the applicant or accepting authority that ne%*d infrastructure will comply with goveninient regulations is inquffielena. .At a minimum, dle Draft Envirmnmmiaf Assessment irmutit he revised to shmv -Tectfically What ittt'ra.StrUc.tcu-e impravcmaits urc Tequird to tine into the Cbunty s drajmngi system and how Chase improvements will function. df:62ry ujicler pcvaity of perjury th2ir the %aregoirxg is tour, Dal ed: K a i I Li it- K an a. l Iawai,i. Octnher8, }020, Si P l 11t U I C: L rlXr, ` .,'?' rt8�r 2 DDC'I_AIZA'I [ON Q JAMLS ]II. JOHNSON 1, James M. Johnson, declare: [. lam a re-%irlt-m of'Kimet 1'tswssjrlxlivrsian 1:W County of Hatvai'L Si4tc: of Hawai.`i. The pnrposed land dcvclopl lent project that k tho subjtxel of the ponding Draft Enwircrim>Lentarl Assessrr trot submitted by Roval Vistas Hewiag Pru fx( Tsar 'Map Kcy Not. (3) 7-(�-021:016, 7 -to - t}31:017, 7-6-02)1:01 K. and 7-6-021.019 North Kw1a District. I lawari'i Bland, StaIc oflIxwaPi atfcc;ts me petsona11y aLs 3%elI a5 aITv,;.s iii}- interest in real property. I reside u•edun 011 #. a/ 1-cfrrr7a .fir 0vch hrj� rr rlrjit= h41 gri7dc and C to thr Snap S5 glI fr-rrrn I.ako ►+°, i h t rrlirn 4, ?'t;lc•r�vdlei n. Mi014P C fins yy in the aiv)- f 7 4 v4trs• lhcai I h(trre 1rved bore, I haiv ahvenwd vehirles rtrr bt 9 to irk wii Crrmrriun li' Ch reale truer 10111 Ihc arva, sura /he Slop c� a ldix mccl of the prop scid lant do vt:kaprnc n1 pro}ic-c:t. In wuch caapa.uitivs. I Im%::c Ir;tIi►incl kiii) wIL got)ftho foIIawing fact%and owiId and would testify thereto if called upon to do so. ?_ i have rcvicwcd the pending DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT including the Traffic Impact Analysts Deport hy SSF M Intemational, dated July 2020 and attached as Appendix ? to the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSES MEl~ VT. 1 wrn specifically voneem ed about ad vers etraffic imputs both within a.nd xiIli (jut tltw Kona Vistas 5Uhdiiision that are not Rilly or accurately addressed in the SSEM Traffic Trnpact Analysis Depart. Traf°tir and the SSFMt Traffic Impact Analysis Report. are discussed in the body of the DRAFT ENS"IR(lNMENTAL ASSESSMENT. at pp. 43-56, 67 and 71. 3 In the Kcaa Vistas suWivisit rtt, 1lic: proW pr«ico rei1cs on the use ofa substandard roadway, Kck— iaaa*oa Place. Kektiana'oa Place is very st(xp, ha3 limitud 5ig,ht distance duo to extreme uurVO, and is nurTow With no sidewalks, No mention i% made 011..c41ani .Vt, which hax, the soiree honey Ptith dowithilt slope and c`uPiv,,% AddtfronaI4% tliis area hav mare residencesfacing fire %trc et Man rhe, uhave onte^d street. resulthri* in mare driii-ways giving arreY,vw to the street 1171, impact cif increaser traf`ic jri,ing from Phan l to d Phase 2 buildouta orbic: Ruyal Visnas HOLIsing Project is in.idery loiitely addreswA in the SSFfv1 TraIT&c Impae:i Analysis RLIMIrt, Whlclt fxu,-c.s instead tin impact along Queen Kanhumanu ll igliway. I a rn pa"artictllarly Concerned that adding ntIMCI`01� cfeliiCIC trips '0 :11111 i -orn a szp aratu subdivision wiII presi;iIt II�IIIgLF.s X I I I k I CsItagCstion L, IL',ial.:IIt• uINCFii�,'„�l'ti.tAuana't,It PI.Su,c mi;i L "S,'. I cons that the P],iLininti� [)c'panmeni should reclulrei 11% ai pliu_IlIt to ;I�Iwlr�.�� 111e�a �';11Gwt'r7t`I. 4. '1'17e l)RAFi l` FNIVIRONNIk_PrTAL ASSESSIvll"NTrt,Nuirc; trval ution vGu1-lung with rs, early-o-sv st'vontlary i+ra,cr wfs, s'ire`n tis �rvpralealiw? chcrriges rye qlc vft feel rwhlrc j1, ergine s, Sge i.."1 apter I I -?(111.1-13, I-I:lLa aiI ,Admini,[nitivc Rule- . lnstoad of squarely uddrc;sAug thesc issues, luwvvw'cr, the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT simply ivinrci there, cltairning that "No aalwirse y"ond ary e fro.:ts am oxpoeted sine: the dew!elopinent would utilize existing infrastructurc. provide infill housin it and is not expected to result in substantial derriainds In Founts services." It is a serious L�missitui iur the DRt1FI' EN VIR(JN%iL N-J'AL ASSESSMENT tti fail to ac &il ss 111v poWii[iUi :IdV I L iitIpacb of increasing t1tc use or substandard existing; infirdstnlcture. like Ktki[aUl a'LKI Place and Leilam St. 5. The DRAFT IaNV'IRON%11'N,rAL ASSESSMENT addroses ac vLrs : traffic impacts only In the context of whether the project would Have a sedirsrrandial ooh- rrso e - ri on I pablic hear+ h. PIC Appliviult Jaims, "Tito Prolauscd Prcjectwould not affect public health 11i aniv. stemiwater %yould be aper priately disposed of in dratnagc st:ruemres. Traffic impacts have beef taktu into j;3=ftrl consideration in project design." Fmphasis added. This bald conclusion does rtut address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 1 1-2K. 1 - 13, Ha-A,ni Adirinistrativc Rules, 6, The I'laiming Department should not accept the DRAFT IENVilION1vIPINTAL ASSESSMENT's reli<amc Lm [lie SSFM Traftic Impact Analysis Report, which has the fallaw'ing d efit:TC11C1C1: a. railureto address lidvcr4c trig i' trxalp:tc9� �lathil'I tllc, Kon;i Viwlos st1}}c11+ 1;itm ori"ing from tlik 1�I�wj4 I, h The SSI -M 'Traffic Impact An. ly%i5 Relxprt tries a grir,<,Ih relit! cel V",6_ in conlrast it) the 2%4txawtli rate �nnplo ped by the 2Ulh Witcher li ngincerlr'Mg Traffic Impact Aaaly is Rcrm)rt, Traffic wngcstion is were sensitivti to growth rate in a non-linear, exporiu tial relation; C, I he SSIAI I r rftw Impact Anal,4wi5 Rcl-x)rI dicks nOt YCLO� _ItilZC 111011-gMMItitln it howdvg churacta.Yt-i$t1+,�s COIL1117kPu in Ha' uJL acti:ordhl& V) ce astis data and likely underestimates daily v hicie trips asttrihutahlc to builiclout cif -the pr€ppc+sc6 prs'',jcct; d. The SSFM Traffic; Impact Analysis Rlepott employs all arnusually low 14 elaia;le volume of 953 vehicles for Northbound Queen Knalium array ht01way on the selectied duces of April 30. 2019. a wcekday and August 24. 2019. a Saurday. co:npark:d %,~ith the 2018 Engineering Ttaffic Impact Analysis Report. which repwr cd 1057 vchiciew for 14 ;EMI 5. 101 G, boThworkdays. Tiie anustlally° low reperlod vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of tete SSFM Traffic Impact Anal vsis Report, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles K pc:r 1wor in '01 fi for Northhound Oucen kaahuMa11U Highway at 7 a.m. The difTorcnce in volume is more than double ft max, imuin 10%vaHaltrtn generally accepted in day-to-day nicasuremenis anti thus unreliable: c, Fhe re%:L)IIInteridaIIk111 ha SSFM -1-na ft ic Impact Analysis Rcpkirt: for a roundabout at Qumn Kaahurnanu Highway anti I lualal:si ltxd 04c)rti) is inconsistent with tho traffic corridor. I ntergections that pass warrants bw remain U1N4 1-tarlized present traffic safety liability concems Fot' the go,,erlxrfielti; r 'f he rcconirrrerrdaiion by SSFM1 `l'ra#'lic 1111pat;t Analysis Rupon for mnniUlrinp Of the inter.cction OfQUeea3 Kaahumanu Highway and hraakim I5ghway is Madegttrrtc. Wlrcrv� as here, ;ut i nwrs'6cCatt pzishvs more th.tn mite warrant tlndcr all eondicions, it should he priun1.it-ecl Fur etude Ann design of a signal for iastaliation- 'phis crriumstan" will he exaeerbatecl by the proposed project, 7, In sum, the Draft Fnviro niveritul As4v:ttirvit_-rat and SSF M "fral'c Impact Analysis Report pious rut present sulTwicttt. erudihle fac-t� and : u -.1ch thlat rhe advme [tnpaicts rs3t existing Mfrastructurt :aii l resulting from increused tratli, ..:Ii, be tullti, ur dumtom ] and result in appropriate pcirvcni 7iew planai ig and resrKmsc:. 1 d%%:l:Ji c un:ler poil r! I}, of ptury that the foregoing is true. Dated: Kailua-Kona, HaWAi`i, OCtaher S. 2020, Signature: &&W 4, Printed name. James It, Jo ason 4 L 8 September 13, 20121 Stonte+c ConsufFing Savices Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tel: (808) 494-20:39 Mr. James Johnsen Via email: jiohnson424.'ftutlook.corn RE: Comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONS1 for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Hawai`I Island Dear Mr. Johnson. Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment L I cern specifically concerned r lout increased traffic. Leiloni St. from Loko to the above intersection, has a downhill grade and curves to the Stop Sign. 1 have observed vehicles coming to Calvary Community Church, unforriiliar with the area, run the Stop sign. Response 1. Unfortunately, these events are not unique to this neighborhood or this pari of the island. The proposed intersection and minor collector roads in the project site would be built to County standards to ensure their safety. Comment 2: The steep topography, historical rapid stormwater run-off and associated damage present hazards that are not adequately addressed in the graft Environmental Assessment. ,Additlonolly, I ann ❑ware that the dreairioge are❑ on West Side of Calvary's 15 acre property, collects water from a large area move. The addition of acres of pavement and roofs collecting water hasn't been adequately addressed in the proposed project, resulting in downslope issues all the way to the highway, and beyond. Response : Flooding has occurred rnakai of Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway from wafers in the County -awned Holualoo Ditch and the Horseshoe Bend Ditch, and as described in Section 3.3.2 of the EA the proposed project would rot increase the amount of water carried by these ditches from the entire drainage basin extending miles up -hill as the project is not allowed to do so. Comment 3: The IAEA does not discuss sufficient farts and analysis such that the necessary drains,-ge improvements and diversions can be understood, A proper environmental assessment cannot leave meaningful details to be taken care of in the future. As I understand it, such circumstances would lead to unlawful project segmentation among ether errors. The applicant, in the current lots remaining in Kona Vistas, has been forced to build a concrete droincge system, disguised as a wall with plants in front, to take care of current drainage issues. This new area would result In additlanol 5ysfems. Q� September 13.2021 Mr, James Johnson Pale 2 of 5 Response 3: Section 1.2 of the EA describes the drainage improvements on the Iwo County -owned parcels. The text in Section 1.2 of the Final EA has been rev sed to clarify that on TMK (3) 7-6-21:19, "Infrastructure during Phase II of the Prooc sed Project includes installation of a culvert system along with utilities and roccl-way across the ditch to extend Kekuana"oa Street, which would then be dedicated to the County as required by Ordinance and called for in the Kona Community Development Plan (CDP) "Official Transportation Map.'" For TMK (3) 7-6-21:18, the protect includes infrastructure for channelizing a portion of this ditch sand includes a road and utility system crossing this ditch to provide the connector road required by Ordinance and the CDP's "Official Transportation Map f=igure 2 has been revised in the Final EA to clarify the locations of the two drainages in the Project Area. Additionally, the text in Section 3.3.2 of the EA describes that Kona Three LLC would prepare a Drainage Plan to ensure that development runoff would be contained onsite. The Drainage Plan which would be reviewed and approved by DPW. Text hos leen added in Section 3.3.2 of the Final EA to identify passible options for addressing the issues from existing flooding. There is no project segmentation since all the components of the project are described and impacts from implementation are analyzed in this EA. Cornmenf 4: A bare conclusion by the applicant or accepting authority that needed infrastructure will comply with government regulations is insufficient. At a minimum, the Draft Environmental Assessment must be revised to show specifically wheat infrastructure improvements are required to tie Into the County's drainage system and how those Improvements will function. Response 4: The potential impacts from these improvements are discussed in the EA. Even though the final design of the onsite Drainage Plan would be identified at a later date, the pcatential impacts from their construction are analyzed. Comment 5:1 heave reviewed the pending draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic: Impact Analysis Report (TZAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEAj. I earn specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts loath within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 5. Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 6: In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use sof a substandard roadway. KeWancioa Place. Kekuan000 Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inude-Q-uctely addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kochumcanu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents Q� September 13.2021 Mr, James Johnson Page 3 of 5 along Kelcuanaoa Place and Leilani Street. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 6: Kekuana`aa Place is a County -awned road built to County standards, with the some specifications as all ofher trona 'Vistas roads, including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on. Kekuora`oa Place from royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana'oca Place to }loyal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -Out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles an Kekuana'ooa Placa during the ANS Peale period, and 2.5 addifioncal vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuano'ca Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Comment 7. This DEA requires evaluation of. among Gathers, adverse secondary impacts, such as population charges or effects on public focilifies. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like K.ekuono'oa Ploce and Leilani Street. Response 7: Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the prapos.ed project_ These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1 of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oa Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and PM peak hours, respectivelyj. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects Impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 8., The IDEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantival adverse effect on public health. The Applicant cicir-ns, 'The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; stvrmwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 8: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and 'Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment 9: The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Resnonse 9. Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local Q� September 13.2021 Mr, James Johnson Pale 4 of w residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 10: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%, in contrast to the 2'7c growth rote employed by the 20118 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response 10: Hawaii Deportment of Transportation IHDOTj counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 20135 Federal Aid Highways hong Range Trcnsportction flan forecast projections for 20203 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1% growth rate. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used I% from the 2025 IRTP forecast, Comment 11: The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project, Response 11: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will nave 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be ur7oocupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute oaf Transportation Engineers {ITEj Trip Generation Handbook- was used and low-rise and mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very low standard deviation and an R - squared value very close to 1,00, so statistically this is the gest projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 12: The TZAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30. 2019, a weekday and August 24. 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repol 1, which reported 10157 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at adds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Queen Kcaahumanu Highway at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 101 variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable. Response 12: The most recent Historic HDOT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kaahumanu Highway section between Nani Koiluca Road and Hualcalcai Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fairly cornporoble, It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, cr if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TZAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count. Cocrarno t 1113: The recornmendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kcaahumanu Highway and Hualcalcal Road (North) is Inconsistent with the traffic corriccr. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. Q� September 13.2021 Mr, James Johnson Page 5 of 5 The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahumcnu Highway and lKuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project.. Response T3: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) states, "The sofMact[on of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.'' There are other considerations that need to ber done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geornetric feasibility, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis, The TIAR does mention where on intersection may warrant a Signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely oppreciate your review of the document, If you have any additional cornrnents or questions about the EA, pleca.se contact me at (80$) 4Y4-2039 or by ernal. Sincerely, 5tantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre-aOstantec.com cc; Richard Wheelock. Kana Three LLC oija Jackson, County of Haw al'i Planning Department Mori, Ashley Fran: Howell <markpSO!-gal-nets Sent: Tl ar c; .;. at-tobei A, 2020 4.24 PM Tu PI 1!111 r Fntempt Mad Subject: Royale Vistas Hco5ing Prnje�ct EA CL)mments Attachments- Royal crestas HabAat.pdf Pry--,., vistas Project EA 1.146969 1.AWN, 111MM611'_I.l.. eleelytre: l . 1 am a rl��,IdUTlt ut Kc+na 1 istas SOxiivision- t`'irarrtw of f lawai'i. State �7t' 11 to i'i. i he prnpa ci lartd devoltlpment pr(cJcCt thal 14 the aulaject JOf tl-w VC[I lit:r Wall Ilnvirunnient;tl s eS*t3itiEll sUbmittac'i h -V Koval i i�;14i.ti HuLlsing Proiec:t `r•'" Map Key ties (;1 7-6-021:016, 7-6-021.017, 7-64121:0,18. Ujid OA171 -ON North Kona District_ I latkrd' i 6lruA affect% me peryu)naI1Y is W01 usufYccts raid• inicr..:.gt in real prOpc:rl�'. I rc-sidL w 4hin Milf a Mile of the prul>{,,,,L-U land dcvc `r'�1;��n� l�roj�:aLt. lii aticb Oara cines. I have tirstllarld i:r ewa'Ictl4t, to Ilii° f'0i Ik%I!IL' I�t+<t� ..Ad LcDWILl ai KI WOUld Itstif}' thereto if L:a ted 'Ir, 111 !00,1 _si' 1. 1hav re:ieti ;J tltc l.,•.ric.lirtg:DRAI I I `:Vll,i'N'wshN'lAL, SSSS-SMI.N"I It does nol addrw!, the lhruaicnccl ear On,13:ft�vreJ spetiics or ios of hahilal I havtL. persettall wittics.ed Flawks and cot Ing this Pt•txNM% 'i lite alpiirut to lx I'%, as-, on the urr en., or dik property. I Lavo s"n I Iawks it] the cal"Iw' iiltimlag 110(ifs raving the taller imes gin lh,� Upper -ide. Just heforc diffk I have men OwI. It ati,r'alr i'rtiril thlt upper area flying over and tar the lower =a ofihc property hunling . Alsu the NA, (001 X Alli r0ol Wide hY 40 fix}t f 1+111 huiltlitigs ma} wr� ~well hanip r or kill pra_ "tcd flaw~ di of seabirds. C uTurlete test tus the Hoary Dal "hriuld hw dom, It appea.rw tlivt the huhhai will he tatallt,° de'strf"Vett. SOUIld ION't need tO be r t)I'1i74d Ifl Nia� llirvugh ` tpiernber FieFore rmy elcstrurtjjon cti hahitat. Lt iom. the Draft LmIT011111cilk' 'I'd ttnpacl Anlll1-Sb RCrklr# c1 * nol presc_7t L1fficicrit, crcdihie facts. a;lvvs` .Lgwicit, wid wlLidi that the advvil tc [fllT icl� an existing Habitat. Threa>cm:,d or E}-:tu anveivd Speck's. &darr of pertur} tht t'te foregoing is [,rut•, Dated- Kailoa-Kana, Septerr'rder 1.3, 2021 Stantec Consufing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek t$QSl 494.2039 Mr. Jahn Poweli 'iia email: mcr�p 04ott.net RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Graft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Dear Mr. Powell: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your Substantive comments. Comment 1: The DEA does not address the threatened or endangered species or loss of habitat. Response 1: The biological inventory report documents the species detected and paienrial habitat at the project site. The Biological Survey Report in Appendix 3 of the EA acknowledges the limitations of a biological survey of a lame project area and the absence of any particular species cannot be warranted from the survey's results. Therefore, the EA includes a description of species detected as well as potential habitat for native species in the existing conditions part of Section 3.3.4. The biological section identifies potential habitat for protected species and the irnpact discussion includes potential impacts to individuals and to habitat for native species (including those not directly detected during the survey). The impact discussion including protection measures to minimise these impacts to native species (including avifouana and bats) and their habitat in Section 3,3.4. Therefore, no impacts to these species are expected from the project. Comment 2. In sum, the DEA does not present sufficient, credible facts, investigation, and analysis such that the adverse impacts on existing Habitat. Threatened or Endangered Species. Response 2: The analysis is bcsed on 1he presence nct only cf species detected but also of potential habitat in the project site, and protection measures are proposed based on the potential presence of habitat and potential effects to the species. Q)� September 13, 2021 Mr. John Powell Pope. 2 of 2 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (806) 494-2039 or by ernall. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. t Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mich4ele.letebvre4stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona, Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From-. Derek Inaba <deFtrlaba 0)qmaiI.ccrn> Sent Thu rsday, October 08. 2020 4,06 PM To. Planning Irllernet Mail Subject: Royal Vistas Housing t'rojects EA. Request for Public Comment Suhm1ssIon,' Roy.iI Viata3s HtPus ng PrtiJectti Dru11 LA, ('I1lriiLy elf 1R1awaai'i PIa nIiiIig DepartIaca7L Request for Public: is"okIIIt1C11t Itcntion• County of II ai,,ai'i PIannIng Department : Im%; laad the upNr(unity it, see (lit: Roo al V6 --las IJousiulg Project Draft Environmental Assessmail, White it Is LILA lc Vulatrt 111OLIS. It did seem lc inadc(ltt.alcicf :1104C 1110 risk tO Wir rr11nnitinit% in al number of areas. I :aril as IIi'llI1w 11:14a,':!1F1 IM''111d rcmiilctll, 11 irti and ra !.Sed, a ntl Illi oha aaa ;md I '.[re very 13miliallN'llh Lhc Ureal undcr rL!" [L'%A' 11S L%CtI aa:, lmt issuL.`wl in and around Kona, and f101LU1110L 11ACILL'1�' I11 ce lli I'L1a11a111i L'STElcs Iti We -o 1 ra1Lt.9l+i we have had suhFstantml Issues 3' iib water she mt;ws avil: nustn-CO N date t0 rtutur.11 tactors a ad a lSO i1­I1r'1NWUwtUTV Laa11L I%:, "Ah ll La JRIIliL<`WW� M'ZI'1Cr VA Al la.all01ti'1 ala',.! Il.'11:11a'S. Were infrLINUU.'1111"k- 0 IAL` III4 III 'LII 1iI*Ii; ILL .Irld in %', eNt Hx" -a fi ILlll} re'L'IJ:'wed It[ IJ ' e..S*ej AI11.1 0% Clc piailis L -n ade to expand Ilii G. oujit+ w Capilt 114' '..1 II °I wIIch ;1 1;11'pe Prk1%lit"AI-Ve detvlL1pincnt" Addilional infrastructure and i-equircd scrVLCCi Issues IicM io be a ddrCSSCd att J11 1arVek. It 1% 11111 Clc;lr IhAt atn'v of t,)tirnorrmil Lnfrii5miclur+: resrvaarcc.s tarp equipp,-.d ,sI .i11 ISS Ilnndlea latr e. cmido dc,,'cslormew and i1111La.x of POPuIImon. I hose Infralstruc;lure II1ti:lk2J0 ti1:CL :1, E ,rt I'A L1at•. .11111 ;stjr~, I,:vs like IJIM-11riu, water, roadways laalre;a1y grclally strc.a%cd ill this Lina), sclxR)1, iiisd al. ;.:w. ;:IIIIaIL:LLILit rvices (County. State, and Federal), 1 did ]lot sre lhc� 'e inij-"ollaiat issuers fully addressed in thQ do, ki t e , I'LialLIrO 10 Fully identlf', and addrC%c illl~� seines could result in large Nickerd casts nor initially iwtecl Or Lichl-ILLtt Havin.g grown tap in EullualoLL .IIld Kona. ail'1Lla I N Lill 144 �iIM1 I -w.' a. I ani, v,�ry foil liar 4c'Itll the mof Lha aging rir altering land in any way and allo rtltitcd water flows and ghccls llrohlcrrls. T'he lancl addr;is. d in the: !gall: Asses,�mwt cuntairts twu signifivalm watunk ays awt can-cmly c'aarr4 tw . 1c safely array tTism the c+LNtng. nvighbofing ou nimunities, I f w:atcr ll.cw its aalte" lrom die Hc1luulL rla Dit4:l1 and Horseshoe Bend. miwch damage could adversely affect all surrounding properties_ This would seem a huge rise for sa l'dy, lrruteUltlrl 01.' proper -lies and hmnLs where karnaa'aina like ttlytiCIf liW. I'liliN Tti:A%1-, 10 k', tII(IIt>.Ir.11II rc:vIewC:d 3S aaatI} i11-1111-ulst.r action here polentiaally pi)m.,s grtdl rIsL t17 our Island uhaana$ sand LhL;lr piol7,`11les. %','c already have suhsTantial iratfic and safety cnriccrrs In our districl Living in Paulani E_siati�-_s. vcry clime to thiw pi mpos d project. 1 umi tell you [!hilt IN haavkc a;11taady exl:}4:`I.'lew':eJ sigtlificant iitf>;aiStrUcture capacity issues with a)iir rc,lLien ha1, secondary Incl main roadway alrterics_ Thcre Ives heen an active [.`roup Irrili, to resolve daary.c ,11iw rLi;lcl;tim. Itiwu 4 In our area and neighhorblx-0 wilh Clle CountY. We have wCcn nuadonts andnr-,1T misses right along Fii alivaanm aq well as just ahove and helaw Paulchisa due to grade and angle_ am! hlind spot i SucS. I1nbelice•alhly we cv= havc speed control i,sues on our slightly lodger r'vJtkntial smxts, Ir the develelaralellt prcltcu%ls. new rOJJ a%s and mcess poiflts v~ otitd necA to be bUlk aalld I'Aly studicd. Thorough and cc'rmpreliensnie study and review Ahen we are Maack, to trAlie flow,; would I -c essential_ The remdents in Lhc area ivill undurslzlrld;Hy %4nl assurance ofprotrVaL o a 11, rrlirliirtlJ,L� aitl} atclLzl,c irtipaitsrel�11:1! 1� ;aslr ti, ruaa.dwaay luaad, cic'vaa11aa1tLtlrls. JOSS cyf use and enjoynient, and ether factors. Thl,, is critical given ow , : yi11t traffic paattem5 and flaws that mak 2`t even more chaticiiging with developnimt alreadyoccuTiing In Vcst Hawrai'i, suvh as IafckN;iv ii Hunry Sirout. W11II I`r'IL, Roy,II Vklaas dcvi loper he rL.yL.INti to flan ±,' disclose, mview 1:16970 and seep public I11lti►,t tin ilrI-V I till infrllstrnlcture 1n.vludmgra:idwuN1 acccs3? Moily pet iple Ir-c q) ;Ilsaracrcd n.kk � ti% stl, Chc iiSUCa 14(70� ill 19 lWt will ward i pLv Forums to piirs"o laliv share, [ace to fkc, ilwir convom% That would afford the rCouRiv and any Jcv 1opt:rs the: S1pporlunit,, tli expI;lir a1 ldvvss_ Anel PCI-hal' 12. alla}' L-Ah.:...r MWId 7T11THMAly c7pcn a ]much needed dial�aguc atnojig all kvy partil,.— A, %Nu ki've seers froin i)flw :live facml 'Wii hLiiiItl pri,bli:ms, gcj()d, niea ured, well considered 1 understand there arc �i number s2 llrtiWOCal and archeological f(mtur�N &4 well a!4 aT-risk and endangered species Ll1t die prnpe'rt}` o9 o cII. These Recd To be FuIIy addressed, ldenLi Dietl. and SClltliCd. IT ilrllcars Ihit the current i1ralft l=[)1alairls only a partial assettilT cot, Arc these isRles ailtiel-paled to he nil►rC L;ITI]1IlictoIN rovicwod', It's my understanding that th steps are neccssarw. 'I'hail you fior reraUQSd1lL, Comment on this draft. I'm sure there .are rnanv other �Igtlificarlt issues =d factors you. art rt!v iewijig or plan Lu rev!L:rw, Thi c;oncurns, Pec addmssed are submitted tier yOtlr WMil3cr COU €4 you rvvlt;�A' III+. -•c rriatturs further 11cspecttillly submitted. IMx.•k Y lr1 lh,i Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsufFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek {$QS) 494.2039 Mr. Derek Inaba via errinil: ma,kp504att,net RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Visnas Housing Project. North Kona District, Hawal'i Island Deoi Mr. Inobci: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please tind responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: In 'West HcawaN we have had substantial issues with water shortages and restrictions due to natural factors and also infrastructure failures with our numerous water well failures and repairs, Were infrastructure concerns in our district and in West Hrawal'i fully reviewed and assessed and were plans made to expand the County's capacity with such a large prospective developrnent? Response 1: As described in Section 3.3.3 of the EA, the water credits for this project have already been committed and paid for. DWS assigns credits based o,, capacity, so the infrastructure can provide the water for this project. Comment 2: Additional Infrastructure and required services issues need to be addressed of all levels. It is not clear that any of our rrinimal intrastructure resources are equipped at all to handle a large condo development and influx of population. Resp2nse 2: Potential impacts to infrastructure including utilities Grid public services is described in Section 3.7'.1 of the EA. As described in Section 3.7.1, the project would be constructed in phases, and occupancy would occur over time. Additionally, it is expected that the project would provide workforce dousing for the local community. The project's first phase would construct rental units, and it is expected that occupants of these units would be local and many of the students already attend local public schools. Section 3.7.1 has been revised to clearify that since the project would be constructed in phases, oil 99 students would not all arrive at once and occupancy would occur over a longer period of time. This is consistent with predicted rates of growth for the area which are considered by the DQE in their forecast planning for pubric schools. Impacts to traffic are discussed in detail in Section 3.7.26 Water commitments for the project have already been secured cs described In Secticn 3.3.3. Comment 3: The land addressed in the DEA contains two significant waterways that currently carry water safely away from the existing neighboring conirnunities. If wafer Q� September 13, 2021 W Derek hobo Page. 2 of 2 flow is altered from the Holualoa Ditch and Horseshoe Bend, much damage could adversely affect all surrounding properties. Response 3: The County owns all of Holualoa Ditch and most of Horseshoe Beed Ditch in this area. The project would not increase the amount of water flowing in the ditches, nor would it change where the ditches enter or exit the project. Therefore, the project will not affect the existing drainage situation. Comment 4: We already have substantial traffic €and safety concerns in our district. We already experience significant infrastructure capacity issues with our residential, seconccry and main roadway arteries. Response 4: 5ecflon 3.7.2 and Appendix 2 (T{❑ffic Impact Analysis Report} in the EA include a discussion cf current traffic conditions and analysis of predicted changes to traffic. The EA incUdes a figure of the proposed intersection which is being developed In coordinalion with H❑wuaii Department of Transportation. The intersection is included as Figure 9 in the EA, and was available for public input during the public comment period for the EA. No comments were received during the extended coo minrit period th❑t resulted in changes to the design of the proposed intersecfion. Comment 5. 1 understand there are a number of historical and archeological features as well os at -risk and endangered species on the property as well. These need to be fully addressed, identified, and studied. Response 5: As described in Section 3.6 and in Appendix 5 (Archaeological Survey Reports) in the EA, the entire project site has been recently inventoried for archaeological resources. One inventory covered 76.1 acres and the other covered 5 acres. Section 3.6 includes a summary discussion of the findings for both surveys that cower the entire site, as well as a discussion of how potential impacts would be minimized. The reports have been submitted to the State Historic Preservation Division for review and acceptance. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at ($0$) 414-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc, r. + Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre stantec.corn cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maiija Jackson, County of Hawwai'i Planning Department Mari, Ashle From; Allisian Benirett <info@biissinbicom cora} Sort#: Thursday, October 08, 2020 4:02 PM TO: Plarlaing Internet Mail Subject: Royal Vistas Housing Proj�act EA comrnents re; Archroological, Wildlife and Traffic Impact Aloha, I aryl writing to you with respect to the prvposecl lard development project that is the subject of the pending Draft Environmental Assessment submitted by Royal Vistas Housing Project Tax Map Key Nes. (3) 7-6-021:016, 7-6-021:0.7, 7-6-021:018, and 7-6-021:019 North lona District, Hawari Island, State of Hawaii. I have found that the Environmental Assessment of this project inadequately addresses its impact on Archeology, Wildlife and Traffic, The Assessment shows great dettaiI on a 5 acre port Ioil of the property that was performed in 2018. The assessment of the rernaining 65 acres included dated lnformatlon and much Fess detail than the 2018 version, Within the property in question are very likely remnants of the Kealakekovaa'a ip;li![ vi ilio road. Kca Trees were harvested above Hlolualoa and logged down to the Kealakekovva'a Heiau where the Koa logs Were carved and made ready for canoe building. A portion of the actual bath exists on the property of the Holualoa fun Berl and Breakfast, ,tip`_.J�'wti^�vr.f� l .4loairrrti.�� �r��-- slide . Historically, most l Ii-�luay were used for sport. This Hlorua, however was specifically built to haul Koa wood to the sea. One unique aspect of this Holua is it;; parallel rock walls that were used to contain the Koa as it was transported down the Holua. The Royai Vistas Assessment strictly Shows the use of these walls for cattle In the late 1800s and early 1900s. In tlic assessment, gore samples of the walls reveal the kukui nut. The ancient Hawaiians used kukui nuts and ti Leaves to help lUbrir-ate the Holua for sliding the logs. This would indicate that the walls are a physical and tangible Piece of .Ancient Hawaiian Hi story. Holualoa is translated to English as "Long elide". lack cf information regarding this pieeo of history is a serious omission in the assessment. My farrily lives next to the Calvary Church land that is directly adjacent to the proposed Royal Vistas Ho'Jsing Project. We enjoy seeing the copiGus wildlife that lives on this land. We regularly see multiple Hawaiian Hawks, Hoary (Bats, and Owls' The assessment merely suggests that these alnimals `quid possibly reside in the proposed area. Fhey DEFINITELYmake their home on the proposed site. ThE traffic study is a:so flawed InteFestingly enough, the study claims that the tTaffrc has improved ;ince the previous traffic study. The entire Kana population world agree wlithout hesltation, that traftic has certainly not improved. In fact, it has became much worse since the initial study. To suggest that adding 1000 cars to this area won't have much of an Impact is wishful th=nking Imagine the traffic light at Lake and the Highway during morning and evening rush-hour! It is additionally innaproprlate that the owners of this land, currently zoned as multi farnily, have been using it as a cattle ranch allowing cows to trample archeological sights. The majority of the cattle have been removed recently, but I have seen at least two cows that are still within the property. For an owner to disregard the zoning of this land shoe s a lack of respect and indicates x,169'71 that we are dealing with art investment group who will do as they piease. Laws do rot allow for this, yet it appears KV3 doesr't want to play by the same rules as the rest of us. This blatant disregard does not bode well for a respomihle., well planned, well vetted and culturally sensitive project. This project should NOT be allomed- Thark you for your consideration. Respectfully, Allison Bennett J 2 I1 r,,; II , i"'n; .? . F ir.H. r�" d�'rr.�, •r4 w `u!r 2 September 13, 2021 Stantec Consutf3ng 5ervtces Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hila, HI 96121 Tek {$OS) 494.2039 Ms. Allison Bennett via email: info(i)blissinbloom.com RE: Comments on Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, h awcai"i Island Gear Ms. Bennett: Thank you for the comment letter mated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: 1 have found the analysis of archaeology, wildlife, and traffic in the DEA inadequate, The DEA shows great detail on a 5 acre portion of the property that was performed in 2018, and a much lesser detail, as well as dated, assessment of the remaining 65 acres. Response 1: As described in Section 3.6 and in Appendix 5 (Archceolc ical Survey Reports), the entire project site has been recently inventoried for archaeological resources. One Inventory covered 76.1 acres and the other covered 5 acres. Section 3.6 includes a summary discussicn of the findings for bath surveys that cover the entire site, as well as o discussion of how potential impacts would be minimized. Impacts and protection mecsLJeS for wildlife are included in Section 3,3.4 and impacts from traffic are included in S__ :tion 3,7,2. Comment 2: within the property are very likely remnants of Kealcakeko a'a road ( path of the canoe). Most Holuas were used for sport, however this Holuo was built for hauling Koo wood to the sea. One unique aspect of this Holuo is its parallel rack walls to help contain the Koa as it was transported down the holuo. The DEA shows these walls and how they were used for cc tile in the late 18000; and early 1900s. This is a serious omission in the assessment. Response 2: Regarding the rack walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 24211 � documented. This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of a h6lua. Also, the walls were 1.0 meter in height and is simil❑r in constructed to similar historic era rack walls constructed along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens, and cattle pastures. "he only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, f=eatures 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastern p-ortions of the project site. These two walls are located olong the boundary of a Land Commission Award (LGA) #x3660. September 13, 2021 Ms, Allison Bennett Page. 2 of 3 Additionally, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the same gulch. It is unlikely that this is a h8lua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a holua in the project site. Comment 3: We regularly see multiple Hawaiian Hawks, Hoary eats, and Owls! The assessn7ent merely suggests that these orimals could possibly reside in the proposed area. They DEFINITELY make their home on the proposed site. Response 3: The biological inventory report documents the species detected and potential habitat at the project site. The Biological Survey Report in Appendix 3 of the EA acknowledges the Iimiictions of a biological survey of a large project area and the absence of any particular species cannot be warranted from the survey's results, Therefore, the EA includes a description of species detected as well as potential hab+tot for native species (including protected species) in the existing conditions part of Section 3.3.4. The impact discussion includes potential impacts to individuals and to habitat for native species (including those not directly detected during the survey). The impact discussion including protection measures to minimize these impacts to native species (including avifauano and buts) and their habitat in Section 3.3.4. Therefore, no impacts to these species are expected from the project. Comment 4: The traffic study claims that the traffic tics gotten better than in their .,reviojs traffic- study, To suggest that adding 1000 cars to this area won't really have much of on 1r7 -)pact is wishful' thinking. Response 4: Section 3.7.2 and the Traffic Impact Assessment Report (TIAR) in Appendix 2 of the EA include a discussion of current traffic conditions and analysis of predicted changes to traffic. The changes in level -of -service from projected growth with and without the project condition in the analysis is based on the results of modeling by a professional traffic engineer, not wishful thinking. Comment 5: If is innapropriate that the owners of this land, currently zoned as mulfi family, have been using it as a cattle ranch allowing coves to trample archeological sites. The majority of the cattle have been removed recently, but l have seen at least two cows that are still within the property. Response 5: In response to neighboring community concerns, Dona Three LLC ceased cattle grazing in the proposed project site in 2019. To their best knowledge, Kona Three LLC knows of no cattle on the project site. However, it is possible that cattle grazing from the adjncent Gomes' property temporarily moved to the project site. September 13, 2021 Ms. Allison Bennett Page. 3 of 3 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If your have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by ernall. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mich4ele.lefelovre stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From: ja4ce Kerr <jkkonaVhawaiiantel.net> Sent: Thursday, Ortobc-i 08, 20:2-0,3.49 PM To: Plaron'Ing Internet Mail Subject: Projects Royal Vistas Huusing Project: Haw4 Island: North Kona District Attachments: KSI OWNERS Det,aration reI'.raf1ir.docx Please we uitaGhud Deckaratrun with signature swcamy, Janice Kerr :6972 DECLARATION (A-' JANIC E URR 1, Janice K€ m declare: I. I am 764 320 Lcifani St—, Kori:, Cnaaatt ,)f I l:i�ti'.ai`i, it1.L caf Hrawa7i�i. T1ic Ian.lI)kiLie� l�aii; I ilc.','cl��x1anc`t1l pr:si��t that is the subject ofthe pending Draft Fm4onnitntal A,ssmaueni. Slal7milled by Royal Vistas Housing, Pruject Tait Map Key No%. (3) 7-6.021:016, 7-6- 02 1 -6-021 't_117, 7-6-02 1 :018. and 7-6-021:019 North Ketin Distria 1-1a 011 Island State Q H aN ai`i '1ftcc] % Trac pur-, an ally as well as affc as my in1crv,%t in real lull?;rty. I rctiiticr witltiax trra anile ol'dw prof -xoscd lan+ develtapment project. In such capacities. I hx-L� 1ir,41mild kaimyledgL: ol'the 1011 awing fracas and coLiId and wi' LiId tustify thereto il'caIled tipran to do so. 2. I have rcVia:WCd the poid[ tg DRAFT ENVIItUWME.N] Al. ASSESSM. EN1 including the Trai'tir Impact Analysis Rquirt by SSF IM Intti-ntationul, dated July 020 and ave ,drew as Appendix 2 to the DRAFT ENVtROWOU'N'I AL ASSESSNIE_NT. I ttni sp"Mc;tally concemod about ad crse irajffic impacts hath within LmJ without die Kona Vistas subdivision tIi as arc newt fully' iar utrcuru:eiY addressed in the SST's Traffic Impact Anatly�k IZ.gcwt. Truifie and the SS FM Traffic Impact Analysis Repart. arc; cliscaasserl in Ilse beady alt the 1)RAFT FNVIRON N41=Ni A - ASS1SSMEN. at pp. 48-56, 67 and 71. 3_ In the Kona Vistas subdivisitrr. tla+ proposul project relies nn the use afa substandard roadway. KeWana`taa Place. Kelrraana`oa P1nce: is ,cry steep, has limited sight 41i3tEtrackm dw: ata cKlrcmc cur, -es and is n=ow wifli no sidewalks. The impact afiricreawe.i Irafiic ansing f om Phaa c I and Phase 2 buildouts oft h� . oya_I Vistas Housing Projcct is iriaclP-quate ly addressin the SSFN Tra1{ic hill:apt Analysis Rcport, which fac>ases Instead cin llil�lads along Quccn, Kaa?l=anu Highway, I ani particularly conmrn d that adding nurlie:rous vehicle trips to and frorn a soporwe suhth,.Ision %', III Erresunt dangers and c4 agestion tory res-adents along Kekuaneoa Place. I coo-idcr that rh: PlannuiB ]-o:-11d rL.quire the applicant to address these concerns_ 4, Thu DRAFT ENVIR{]NMENMIL ASSESSMENT requires e-v;d uation ckl', anong uthc1s. r'rrrptrct+r. NUC01 CIA JMP11106017 c_hct+!igeg or eftc is erre piibla'c fcrc•llifies. :'�L Chapter I 1 -?i)+ I- I I k i waii Adniinistrat i-vc Ita)es. Instead nfsLIuarcIy adtI ros i n g IIiraw Issues. however. the I)It. ;: I }- 11' Ik( )' � AI- ASSF1;SM ENT �inlplv ignores di c= Cluirning dial "Iti'i 4111CC ille dc,A)[I1T1C1it wI aht u.tl10C existing itlCrastructure, JIT-OVIdO lil:i!] lopwi111_. ;11nd Is nLit exI)ected to re-,ult Ili tiijMilntia I dernlands io County services," It is a scricous omission for the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL. ASSESSMENT 10 rail to address line polential adverse impacts (If increasing tilt: use of substandard existing Infirastructurc, Kc Kekuaa�Woa Plue. 5. The DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESStti ENT• addresses adverse traffic tttlpoCts only III Lha >.unlexi of whether the Ixriajccl ;NVILtd 1lerl-c-11 srobs toirdialacntte►se circl on pijb1ir° hefilrll. The Applicant clairis. 'The 11rofxnscd Prc)ic'�.t would not aiieLt public health in any wat•; stonliwater Nvou.d he €splaropnnlrely ilislxised of in drainage stnlctures, -traffic itn acts have been taken into careful consideration in Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not: address potential adverse impacts as required by ChapWr 11-2W. . l -13, liil>+ ali Aditiltii*Lr4l>,'r: RUICS, 2 6� The Nanning Dupwimcm should not accept the DRAFT ENVERCiNMENTAL �SSESSNMENT"s reliance on the SSI M Traffic; Impact Analysis Report, ti hich has 1110 rollowing dcticioncies: ;s. failure to address adverse traffic impaLls withM the Kona Vistas subdivismil Linking from the pralec:t; b. The SSFM TraMic lmp4ct Analysis Repm t cs a growth Fate of IIN, a» contrast W die ?% gruw1h rate employed by the '2018 WitchtT EngrinLvr'ing Traflic: ImpaiA Analysis ReF irt. Traffic congt_Ntimi iw vcr% scnsitivQ to Aowth tette Ma n1111-1111vilr, exponential rcLmon: c. -I'he SSFM Traffic impli l AnLj1Y4;:1; 1ZL�I.10Ft r[LtC% I1L1I 1_"i .Q11i .e rnulLi-gene]-a[Loilal ltr?usiijg 6haractvriwtics common La Ila" -.Lid accordMel W census Bala and hkely LjndotL tisiii 7;,Ic:s dewily vehicle trip--, attrihulahlc 10 beads 0111 Offile PRI'Jetj; cl- 1"bSSFM "fralffic 1Li-spact Aaalysis 1�eport cmploys an unw. ally low v;,hicic volume of 853 vchicLs fur Northbound QL.t+:Qtl KaWil,r imw liighww'ay on the: selecte4l dates of dept'[ 30, 2011 ). a weekday and Augusl 24,'+11�. a Saturday, L:cjmparW %vitl7 tbc 013 Wicchcr Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Report. which rq;portcd 1(157 vehieles for January 14 anti 15, 20.16. hath wca:kdav;c, -I'lie unustyaily low rejmF A w,ehicle volume of 853 is also at odds xvith Figur~ 4 ofthc S517M Traffic. Impact Analysis Report, which shows approximatcly 10511 Vchicles per hoar in ?!.l[6 rur NonhFound Qum -n Kadhlumanu Highway at 7 ii.nt. The difference in Volume is more thrjrt dOuhle the rrtxximum 10% variation gencrall" HL:cCpwd illi day-to-day measur€mens and thus urwellable', C. The recotrlmmidation by SSFM Traffic Impact ,Analysis Rcport FOr a rOLanc[tthow at Queen Kaahurnanu Kighway and. Ffualalai Rcmd (North) is inconsistent with the traffic 3 c01-1-id(jr. Iritcrsections cftai pass tw.,:1•r:Snk h1l r-,-IIIr iii n:1�t°_,r:1ti�� cl I)FC!"'11l traffic liability conQerns for the goverru ictiit; f The rcklxtttt7tondaiIon #1N -SSI'M Traffic Impact Analysis Rcport for monitoring of the Intersection ofQuee1r Kaahult anu Highwayand Ktiakini Highway is inadequate, Where. as here, an intersection Wises more Lhr1n one v� arrant uneter al f COMfitiOnS, it ShL,Uld be primitized for study and design of"a ;I nal for installation. Thi; circumstl nen tt ilf hl• cxi,cc!+mod by the [)IIID Sed prLOjc,:L 7. hi mini, [lie Draft Environmental Aswssment and SSFM Traffic Impact Artal'vsis Report c oe.' not presc-w %WTI4, INI[, c: edihlt Id LS dIld Wnalyvis staclt ilial thtr Adverse irnpacls cm cmisiing, i:if"rastr°Ul AUI'u lmd rc:sultlag From inwivwwd trnf`[ic can hc. tully understood and result iii nlipropn,lte gover!_ mcnt planning and resIXIIIS . I ticr"I-Mv u'ulc't;)CM TV of rcrllwry ihat the tivcLwnmll Mw trtkc, Datcd: KaiItia-ltinna, I iawat' , October A, 2 02 0 Sigmaturc: Janice Kerr Printed rt�unv: Jw}icc Ir:a-rT Mori, Ashle From: Janice Kerr-jkkvn40Phawraiiapntel_r,et Sent: Thursday. 0ctoher 08, Cb?C = -16 PNI Yn; Planning Internet Mail Subject: PROJECT- Royal Vistas Hoosing Prof ct, island of Hawaii, District of hlarth Kona Attachments: Der-iaMrotic n R V_ docx Please see attached Dealurat on Sincere l y, Janice Kerr 7'97 D C'1,ARA' ION' 01- JANI 'E K RR I- Janice Kerr, declatre: 1 ain a resicienl of '16-420 Leilaani St..' lona Vistas �,uh livisionj. COU11ty of I kiwa `i, State of f lawai`i_ The pre"ed land dei clopanent proajeer that is the subject of the pending Dralt Envirx nnienW Assessment subirutted by Royal Vistas Housing 7n jcc:l Tax Map Key Nos. 1.30 7-6-021.016, 7-6. 021:017, 7-6-021:01 N, and 7.6-tl2l :019 North Kona District. H ativari Island, Statc ofHawai`i aallixts 111v PCI-aaaetally as wwoll ai afl�cly my inturest in real properly, I r��icic �w ithin �ritc rn�lc ia1 thy° I7rtap9�wc'tl 1aar7cl clevcica�atxtcwtt iarr7�cxt, In such capacities. I haws lirstla:antl l-nowledge ofthc fulluwviraR IaOs and could and ra otild testify thereto at' callCAl Uplin to rin sw3 ?. 1 have reviewed line pending D RAF'I" hNVIRONME, NTA L ASS LSSM11NT ilkLlUdiffi 4 ila 'i I,al'tic tzla)-<ket Ai ti i it 'port br SS I Iia tiazU11t011a1, c1L<<cd R11 ?Q-0 and :altschCd pis Appeuch% ? to the IW -\I- I I'NVIk 1-V\11 \'I A1. 1•:.--,10 LN i l ant -Vecitically cenccrned about advctsc traffic inll'act�, �k :tliisi .Uld w Allo -A the l ojw Vista,, subdivitiion Ihal are nol rully or aeeLaMICIV addressed in the SSi"1v1 Traffic Impact Analysis Report. `i raf:'fic :and the SSFNI Traffic, Impact Analysis Report. are discussed in the body of the DRAFT ENViitC1NMENTAL ASS P�' SMFNl . at pp. 48-56. A7, and 71. 3, i h- -Lion, Oil- prupo �,M proj"i Tees tat? 0C wt u ora substandard nmdway, Itis � uaawva Place. Kckualta`oa Place is verve swep, has limited sight distanues due to extrcmc curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of jnoreascd traffic ata isI S from Phase 1 and Phase ? buildouts of the Royal Vistas Housing Project is inadequately addrL-Nsed in the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis R,:Iwa, Duluth Focuac:, inske,:ad can Wipat:ts along Queea IC.aahirm nu l tighway. I am partic-ularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to tinct fTom u. separate subdivision will pry nt bngum and congestion to ru-sidents along Kekllana°ea Place. 1 consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant Teti address thcaC Concerns_ 4. The DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT r(.44u1rv,, c vtllualloa of, iirnon, others. arch-a;r'se- sei-ondar_v inrlaric'r,s, sira.{fir rrs IM)pWl Won e•lu,r nes or R-#eeN 011 �c Chaptcr 11- DO,1-13. Rawaii Administa-ud ve Rules, instr,ad of"squarcly addressing flicic i.ssuc,s. howevcArr, the 1)IxAF-1l-:NVlRONMl;N'I AL. ASSN S'�il, N 1 ti.niply ignores theme claimitag that "No ad�vn;e secondary efF CLS are cx ctc�J sHice the c1ek-elopilrettl Mould uti'lire ex istinginlru4truclure. pnwidc infill hou.41ng, and i4 ni, i expucl oil to resA in suh larilial demands to C-ounly seri ic;es_" 11 Iq aserioLis omawon for the DRAF F i,:1NV11R-(.'3NMl:7-,N'1A1, ASSESSMENT to tail ttx addres-N Clic ptactilizll advvrsc impacts Ofitt easing the usr of strhwt:+rttic�nl exi torr; i rl'ra4lr�ac'i�ar4,, like KL+-uaua't" 11I3ce.. -1 h,, i)[t"'tFF LNVIItONNIE'�T_`& ASSESSMENT I-iddresscs a`idverse traffic unttacts only in (ILL! LmlL xt of %VltL�dl r dic 1}roic cl would Haw a .salasrantied {.A c•f OR parhltc health, The Applicant claims. "Me Proposed 11rejectwould not at%ect public Health in any ware; storrrawater would be a pproprint-Ay cli ptosed of in drzin igG mtructures. Traffic impacts have been naken into carelid con ideratign in Emphasis added. This bald conclu5iun does not address potential adversL itri paat4 as required by Chaptcr 11-200,1- [ ti, II ani Adntirtistrativc Rule. 6. The Planning Mpartment should not accept the DRAFT CNVlR(3 W—N'IAL ASSESSMEN79 re.lrance on the SSI ;M Traffic Impact Ana lysis Rcpurt, which has the fcalltawing de l'iciericles: a. tail«rc to addrem adverse traffic impael,S WiLhin LhL Komi Vi4T;IN Staff IVI• iWl arising frrrrli tlae project. b, Tile SSFM TraMic hnpacL Atwlysk Report u�,os a arowdi rate of 1%, in corp mt to the 2% growth rate employed ley the 2018 Witcher Fngincering Traffic Impact ,ort.1pysis Rcprart. Traffic q;catigcslioii is very sensitivc: to grcrlxth rate In a trona -linear- cxponc Glial relatioal; V. I"iie 51� ] Traffic Impact Araalysi Itcpc►rt cicac„ I7cal reCO91lirc mull i-p<w, :rational liousing cliarac;terisciics c.carnmon in Hawaii ac rding fc7 census Baia and likely umJcrestimatcs daily vchic le trips altrihut:ahle to huildoul of Clic proposed projcvE; d. The SSI -00 Traffic Impact Analysis Deport employs an unusually low vehicle vulwtre or S33 whiclo for Northbound Quo:it Ku ahumatiu luoavtaV UJI 114 8t:Wc Wt.l diaaus UI' April 31J, -2019. a %-Lckday and Atiatist 4. 20N, N, a Sai i nLiy. conipar. d w ilh thu 2W 8 Wilchvr En&rinee.ring Traffic InipLici Analvsis Riport. which rcNrted 1057 vehicles tat' Jtuuuary 14 and 1-5,2016, hath w(Amkdays. The utiusually loA FLIX111Cd •,L411CIt VOILIrareor853 Nilk0.a1 (Idd, wnilii Figure 4 of flee SSf'1vl Traffic Impacl Analysis Report. which shows approximawly 1050 kve ides pa hour in 2016 for Northbound QueeTi Kaahumatiu Highway at 7 arra, nu d4tTerence hi volume is more than double the maximum IW n variation generally acceple€i in day -10 -day tnUASLrc-Ment~ anti thLIS unrelia'hlC, e. Ilii recommendation by 55rwl Traffic Inipcact Analysis Rle}port for a covndahout at Queen Kaahumanu Hi zhwa% and H=1alai Road (North) is inconsiatcnt vwrith the Iraffic corridor. lnG4rsrrctiortw tTtint pass warrants but rerrtain unci aIizei Are nt traffic safety liability concerns for the vcmrncm f The re:cc mmctit]a on by SSFM Trafl u Impact Analysis Report for mPniitori ng of the inter-sectioti ofQuten l;.aahumanu Higliway and Kuakini Highway is inudeyuatu_ Where_ as here, art mtcrosetkicin passes more than tine tiararrant under all condition.4, it should be prioritized ibr study arra design of siLnial fnr installation. This circumstance wilt be exatxrbaiLd by the pr-oposcd proje:cr. i. In .sura. the Draft l--nvtrtmmcnlal Aswmgtnent anti S'S M 'I raftic. Impact Analysis Report, doom not prescnt sutficical, cmdiblc fuel$ Wd rtrxalVst�, �,uclr llt.sz 11iL ad%'MC irltpaCtl:011 c;xisring infrastruturr* rind resulting from increascd traffic cial h.. (011. m1crstoml and resin in orppropriarte govern enC planning and response, I declare randcr lionalty ofpojury that Clic I(+rcg+ ii ng iw i n i c Dawd. Kailua-Kona. I lawaVi. October N. 020. 5i P'latuxc, I'riil LLQ] name. !since Kerr DECIAiZA.J-10N OF JANICE K.ERI, 1, Janice Kerr. declare: t . I wn a resident of L76-4320 Uilani St. / Kona Vistas subdiv-1sion]. County of I lawai'i, State of Hawaii`i. The proposed land dcvQ1opm%!n1 project that is the subject nf the pending Draft Enviminiental Assessment suhmiftd by Royal Vistttws Housing Project Tari Map lacy No%. (3) 7-"2.1.01 b, 7-6- 021:017, 7.6.021:018, and 7-6-021:019 North Kona 1.)istrict, I lawai'i Islatid. Stag of l lawai'i affects me pors[mally us well as afflect% Ilyy inte-rest in read property. I resickc within one mile of he proposed land dcvc l(ITAlttutit I3rc►jt# t. In stich c'apacitiies, I have firsthand krwwleclg„e ofthc folIouing fiefs and Lzuld wed would testiry thereto if'called upon to do -u), ?_ l have revicwW the pending DRAI="1' ENV1kt)NItP N I'Al. ASSESSM-EN'T imiuding the Traffic Impact ! nalys,N Repcm by SSFM Intcrm ional, dated ILII} 20 V -ml attac hod as Appy: IiN. 7 tt, the DR .^ . ENVIRONiVlk:l�l'"iAl_ ASSE SW,NT. I wx specifically concerned above, ad vcrsc trat-fic impacts hath within and without the Lona Vist&s suhEhvisitm that aro not fully or accurately addressed in the SSFM "i -r f is Impact Analysis ReIvIrt. 1 raffic and the SSFNJ Traffic Impact ArWysis Reporl. are discussed in the body of the DRAFT EN, VIR(.)NMFN 1'Ai, A' NESSMENT. at pp. 48-56, 67 and 71. 3. In the Kana Vistas IiUb liviNiffri, she proposed projees relics on the use of u substandard roadway. Kel:uana`oa Palace. Kekuana`oa Place is very steep. has limited sight distances due Ui extrerne curves and is marrow with no sidewalk: ,The impact of increased tragic arising fmmm Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildouts of the Royal Vistas }lousing Project 65 Inadequately t;�64 addressed in tk SSFNI Traf c Impact Area.lysis RLTcwt, which focu►. s instead on imps along Queen Kauhumanu Highway. l ani particularly concernod that adding numcrous vehicie trips to and Ibxn a separate subdivision Will ,present dancers and congeFJon to residents along Kekuana`oa Flare_ l consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to adr s these cancers. 4. The DRkFT ENVIRONPvlD�AL ASSESSMENT rewires evaluation of. anion othcm, adverw secon&u;v impYam, such as popu rtion changes ter q#cts r�rr ptehl�c; �crriltlr�,r,. lieu Chapter 1 1-200.1-l?,11awaii Adm ini: mlive Rules. Instead of'squarely addressing Ihese issues, however, the DRAFT 11;I"w1VWONMENr['Al. ASSESSMl It T simply ignores th-cm, claiming that "No adverse sc:co ndary effects am expected sire the development would utiiizx existing, infrastructure, provide infill housing, and is rH)t expected to result in substuxtipl deem to Ouumy It is u wriLous omission for the DRAF1 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSt .SSMfi;N1- to fail to addrcss the potcritia.l adycm Linpacts of incrcasiag the use of substwidard existing infrastnrc me. like Kekmt Wast Plaacse_ 5. The DRAFT l;'WRt1]VN E TAL ASSESSML;NT add adverse traffic impacts only in the context ofwhethet the project would Have u mbylrarrlial ao'verrsek c'�'�e el Oil public Iheahb. The Applicant claims, `1 he Proposed Project would not affect pubbC h< alth in any wav; stormwaacr would be approtxiately disposed of in drainage struettires. 1"ratric impact's have hm..tako I= careful consideration in prajest_d i=" Emphasis added. 7119. 11a1c.l nonclusio n does not address. potential adverse intpact_s as required by Chapter 11 Hawaii Administrative Rules. fir, The Plai-ming, Depamment should not score the DRAFT F.N ViRONMEN7TAL ASSESSMEN'Ps reliance on the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report, which has the following deficiencies: a. failure to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdi,. ision arising from the prgJe C la. The SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report uses a gro"th rate of I %, in contrasl to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Enginceritxg Traffic 1rapact Analysis Rept t, Truflic congcstion is very sensitive to growth mete= in a: ron-linca,r, cxponenlial relation. C. The SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Pveport does not recognize multi-gencrallonal housing characteristics conunan in 1 law ,aii aconrdinp,, try census data and likely utiderestinufles daily vehicle trips awibuLable to Buildout ofthe proj%) kI project. d. The SS FM Fraffic impact A.nalysi% Rcp.►rtr einploys un uuiuswally low ve11icle volumc of 853 whidcu for Northbound Queen Kmhuntana highway on the selected slates of APri131), 2014, :a wmkday tui d Augu:st 24, 2019, a Saturday, Compared with the 2019 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Report. which reported 1057 vehichns for January 14 wd 15, 2016. both weekdays. The unusually low relxurted vehicle volume of 953 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the SSf'M Traffic Impact Analysis Repctirt, which shows upprurximmely 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for Northbound Qixnen KaAtjmanu l f if-hway at l a.m. Tyre difference in volume is more than double the: maximum 10% variat ori gcnertilly €wcepted in day-tn-day rneasuuements and lhus unreli;1.b1e. C, The re rnmendation by SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report for aroundabout at Qumn Kaahurntrt'tu Highway and Hualalai Road(North) is inconsistent with the tratTie corridor. lnlc:m�cdon;s LhaL pais view rets but remain unSignalis prewnt truffiec safety liability coomms for the government; f. The recornmendation by SSIM'Traffic Impact Analysis Report for monitoring of the itntersmflon of Qu" -n Kaaharmanu Highway and Kuakini I I Ighway is inadcquate, 14h.crc. as here, an interwctiuu passes more lhnn one warrant under �cl I cond1tiom,, it should bre Tin- on- rized Mr study and dcsiLai of a sipaI for installation. `chis circumstance w ll [w cxaccrbated by the proFKn l project. 7. In sum, the Draft Environmental Asps must and 7`ruffic lmmm Ana]ysl Deport rids ra)t present saffic:ic iat, credible facts and ;analysis such that tlx: -,L&L r;v zrr111INI •t, (11 L existing Infrastructure and n�Shchl-tg FrI,Tn ,nc•rc asvd Irail w c. -w he ftllk U:1LJ(1':;1 ('LJ ;inn rt,sitlt ii, appropriate gLivernme:rn planning and resgyomw. I declare tinder penalty of peg jury that the fureping is Uw. rMiW, Kailua-Kona, Hawtu`i, 04 ul.-+c:r 8, 2020. - igt'tattuc: Prigted tom` Janice Kerr Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 Stantec ConsutFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek 1808) 494.2039 Ms. Janice Kerr 73-4320 Leilani Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Email: �kkC�na hcrr�caucantel.net RE: Comments on the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kana District, Hawol'i Island Dear Ms. Kerr: Thank you for comment letters on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Since we received three letters (two by em ail one of 3:46 pm and one at 3:49 pm on October 8, and by mail post -marked on October S) with identical comments, these responses address all three sets of your comments. Comment 1: 1 have reviewed tie pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I anal specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 2: In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekuan000 Place is very steep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase 1 and Phase 2 buildcauts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahumanu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2: Kekuano'ca Place is a County -awned road built to County standards, with the some speciticcations as ail other Kona Vistas roods, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana'oa Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of Kekuana'oa Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuana'oa Place during the AM Peok period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana`oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak pedods, which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2021 Ms. Janice Kerr Pt se. 2 of 4 .Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increosing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents as described in Section 3.7,1 of the EA. Regcrding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana`oa Place,, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oo Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the A -M and P peak hours, respectively. The traffic caralysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic: effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, "The Proposed Project would not affect public henith in any way, sterrnwoter would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11,200-1-13, Hawaii Administr❑tive Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under re5pective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in hurt 5: Findings and Reasons. and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment 5: The Planning Deportment should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision abising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kono Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersectlons are not expected to be significant. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%. in contrast to the 29, growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a nein-linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1 growth rate. Alth,ti).,gh we are not certain how Witcher Engineering gat 2, our traffic engineer's uses. 1 T from the 2025 LRTP forecast. September 13, 2021 Ms. Janice Kerr Comment 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics con--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response l: It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Instif[t(.- of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and low-rise cnd mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use hos a very low standard deviation arra on R- squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8. The TIAR employs an unusually law vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30. 2014, a weekday and August 24, 2019, ca Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repol 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for ianucary 1.4 sand 15, 2016, both weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for I.lorthbound Queen Koohumanu Highway ❑t 7 a.m. The difference in volurne is more than double the maximum 1O°7o varication generally accepted in day-to-day meosurernents and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDOT count ovoiloble in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahumanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Road and Huololai Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to t�)e 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if lege Witcher Engineering report is overcounfing, or if the project's TIAR is unfl r�._r'lir� but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those f r )v7ded in the 20116 HDOT Count. ComMent 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hvalolai Road (North; is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsIgnalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahumonu Highway and Kuak ni Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on intersection gasses more than one warrant under oll conditions, it should be pr1oritized for study and design cf ca signal fear installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project. Re31212rx;re 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCD� states, ,The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or worrar7ts s,holl not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric teasibility, and others. The scope Q)� September 13, 2021 Ms. Janice Kerr Page. 4 of 4 covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection racy warrant a srcgnol, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant ca signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact rne at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Sfanfec Cansulfincg Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, ME. michele,lefebvre-6 stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hciwar'i Plnnny ng Departmerit Mori, Ash] From, D Blancett-rnadd-:)L rdbnnkcrwfltaa; corn> Seat: Thursday, ciab�f 08, 2020 3:35 PM To: Planning IrrterneL Mail Subject: ROYAL VISTAS HOUSING PROJECT EA COMMENTS Attachments: KV [AD -DAVID SIGNU) MCLARATION 10-C8-ZtJ20.pdt Attached please find my declaration/comments to the Royal Vistas EA report. With aloha, David Blancett-Maddock 76-101 Kamehamalu St., Kailua Kona Hi 96740 Kona Vistas 1,16974 dc:late: I . I am rt resitC -w w 76-101 EtigMellMlalu SMA. Kai lrvi Kona, HI 96740 of Bona Vint- stiWIViSion. County of l i;w ai'i. State of lluwui`i. _F1tc prvpv%cd hued t evele,pimnt Ilrujoct that is ihe subLcot af the l-wndhiv I ) rafl Lt3viroo intittal As�sawm1 nl submim-d by Ror ul Vista`; Housing Prfl,-txl Ia.%; P,vj.j1) Key ` ;)s. (.i )7 2 1 ;~116. i-6-021.017, 7-6-021 :01 K, ~incl 7-6-021.019 N,; rlli Kurtrx District, Ilan LLi'i Isl,ancl. tti t` I l:rtikaI'I iiCk,:ts n �vrsoiiiII y ;.rw w,J1 as ~~Ilea, illy ifl[01'6,1;1 1r) real prilpe:rly. I r4,K41�1e %�t11[1T1 L'NN't11u11 ? 111i1C ofthe VrtposeJ land Lievolopinent praticci. In yud: c racitio,;. I lir-1horid 1-olowledge ofthc foll(P+A1t1:r tsrct;, W)d Could and %voulid tcstI.6 111L.r.tp1 11 C.111wit 13pin n I4". rlii sc}. 2_ 111,tro revio ued tl;rc pcndmr_ DRAU I l N''Vlk(.1!' NlL,ti'I AI .r4SSFSWF,N] irtcluJintg duo Trallic- Impact JLn it}si Rej%►rt 1)a s�;�3�'l Ilkrwra>tat�c���I, dated .Is�ly *11?{_I;ar1�I attachCd as Nvnelix 7 in the DRAFT FNVIitONMI-N I X11. ,+'SSS[?SSME•`NT. 1,qm spwc11ic:alh co1,urned aiwut adver e m.011C iulpile`:t b0tl1 4111d WAhr."ut t4- Kona Vistit.N -suhc. ivisikm that tirt not ;Ill% or accurat. Ak :Lj%1T4 i'ML1 is" the SS'3 Ttatlic Impact Artttlk•sis 11�qsrt, 7 rL,t-tik- atld &1 SSFM A rat"tic Impact rAntlysi- Ri�jx,A ."i dli CtlS%ed in the h , c t tk: E)RAFI E IN v I Ind A M hN I AI . ASSE: SSMEN C. at pp. -4 8 -5 , 67 and 71. ctrl c:a.rntis rr1:�i ftt Itiow 1-hree. 1.1..(" (j)evL a,per) .,uhleiits p1°off,, to t€nrlingr% of -`nes ;ignificura Irlapao (DEA-t''3FMI) it nit ttpportcd by the lauts I nni concerrred thU LJL:ia>'S- I]EA Study is pruti tnia., �0>ting iarth dcdatr'advils in bvilerplate Eashiva whilc ok1l'ttAatiog. urttlttiatg or r11awdal facts Luck :�nalysas. I! zi�IPCWI t1�1"t Devel+ per a irtiis ma;ori;.tl :rk,o Ial Ie IOLil fdL:tual 111 ormatiorl tirc)m its analysis ncccssan. LD 4c 11A1late the tn1` cn%ir{gym aeritul UnLL.t L1eIi� + that. Dew-eioprcr Inns t nillcci kt:%' tiladin�M iwcc"ssan- it, Iair and prorc[ iw-dNsi' ill' clivinl mienUl impact 1 .Inti rnncea-rlCd [hill DC%Clcaper hliti tiiihmiil[ eki generic rl odulin ur (911 fktQd informatim in disregard of kne,a:vrr lecal CnIAlUMS WId c11.[.�w. �r ��: l:: Is r I.• rsr valid [actutal .wpporl in the Wtard. Ins[Load. at dp.�,ctrs that Dev-eloper pt arrtIis pvR .-C':113laslI11'y agcila;ics ituled rc:clk.:irt:tnl4�, .c• t [mere li.� mr-anve! 3af Iinturt tioniplianc3:. Dmimiuns and unbslplrurtvd h.ssumption& Iia my nrinilcm. this rvp'} m seL�is tellin,>h Elewid galfactual statc menu of esscnllal t6mkdatiriftal eloritc.rlls neccsiar4 lo J valid asw*-mens ❑J -the eras-mumrrttal WOlIaLk cal• gIis ',CFN 4rg . high dclasil} projeCt Sump7riral;is_4 c"4:ik.lil?Is` �} t"ti�,ti'•liit'i rall�wlr�' :! L'4 t;lo[tctl�l� low'.1 factual anti int'1a11c rhL' follt}�w'p,:1 owa [s sl:aaecl 0. [IrMlle 01 Ili fI)LII;A 1011 of the towl expatood pcap ul;7tion Imalls. either in aggregate ter c1Lt[a 9 I?� +E Ruylrc r tr a1}1 �I r+ .r4 r.I dollar v&LiaKIh:.N rLIssip-j—wd Icrt 11114' Sil ICN rricc-i 01" "3t,[ l" r, Ruvelr�1X°r Oralr4 slhlsr lw ror cOlrlp?Icti 11Id4trs fora p+ro.iwt 1h 11 I par iliree .I"udk�s alreudc. 'I 11 slif*mis,,raii iy clVYPitl Of LIL18 10;16:tltl4tcl� adLb ..- or dcfcwik- 11:, - I '�.Itig space ( In its lace. lkvcjlkpc°r-w 44mi"111all aplwars ILI m4ticc cinly FrOfOrMa. PClPrar4 e}I•COIIltltt's :and tiligs wwilh COIII Mllrvlt trcprrrsa.rliatii cs and guNcrr.[taeiat;al avclicirs vV1111 halcl &muntns;e to comply. hur +,miili liar QL1ttls 01' Nti,.'lcrl•,cbr omits ohtiem-Bhly Lima of kak'Wl 110 tiding U1111 r 1111 .5��flCt*ws. A1C rtiti�Llckake6r cicacrihc Jku�n lti cl e -do hent twill atitpre4s the e.'t USOLIUC1I C% 10p�ret�larir,1),1 alnd tw mer rain -i Il-re,,3klling [I -(MI clULL6[IV ;LLld IIWri11 Wtd add irV, rctcnticapa rtmoll'ta ?li acres 0 land wc911 lilt -%kn Ilo(d31kgc:t}`nOiiions- l)rw,cIopei %tIhLs61wtti a S111rIC val- IabI':lulIimEkKal boIIcl-pl:ateIncAq� I to esimiate t-rrllfic; load i opiiO., wwhicl} uitlits 4and Faik tc► ccrn3iid r Sibs rw:nble rule �tsc crtaiti ahlc local data anti soc:ioh►py Ihail IticarL" accura ely reflects actual lural ctwndilmns and likely wntMdlic:r� underlying :iasumpatirt`mc in the N)IlQrplate national riwidel.s. tiNlwh would Eke1y tc ridcr lhosk, rnraelels ilnttiltxx1l-aall0 rn IVt'ftl ;IJ-�plliCali On W� applA An tKarrlplc- ut wwllI I'Atrre to Lx)113irlkr local sociological dctnogrophwie data is 111MNquate may help For exzar plc. I am wnccrm:t-1 shat Dc!vete pet relies exclu welt ark a a al is impact nieKfel that mech"Inicallti' apaplies a naliurml Standarcl txilhout rggard la+ obvious ks"lrc vV5 and rival bhie elate z I rant coacxnwil %Etat by wiin- this model, the rile Itt -�igniticwmly ulldeff'uttew iIII [)art tOPUT l'CNt1t71UVIIie, IXCiIUSL it terort~w tlhvit) ias orri:Udily ascertaitiable dant. In the insiaw cast;. tht re iw evidemce. that l cahscrvc routinely', t1# a E461-krrty"A t_ -d U'lpiricEd) clhstr� thlc criclll l,` that tlectrrs claih llrrrill rush ]t{rur l'Colrm!071 t rl"1e% 6-0' ;,tOTitrru,tc W workl- Alis perwtm hung on thL., side of the istand, inc.itrtting rrlyNAC hUl- WTUPete:ItlY %)hS'0I' ~-.1 Kctakrrri Hwy Ou,—en K IzighvSa} itthe prilllal')- Ctltrlmutcr highway for tl ormlig, and eM%;rrit:_ e0111mOCS icy and Ir un the 17ruposci development is a residem's pLivkw cfl"Lvur� I have uhwF: 'tl the Vrc-covid grililaA 0f bHAW up I ra 1111 tttarinL tnr mm- atrld C: �I I itIL coin] mire pn,tlrs titr w vur;al rrlilc�{ smith (ttil'(cn inorc thati :t mile pail ts.in� Latch-art1cha III road mhic1 iN a CIN P11 cat- rnlles r,rtth 01 1 nka Strw) ttrid tit, rtlt a couple oI'miIcw inch k:a'Itur K1111;1 c'l Henry -,Ined. II-'votj nctiA IruOrc e�Jdcsict• vl this twaci 11mri my Lcs irtlrgn). this lint czIn ensih Ncct :orilirw,l J h4 1wul1tt1g C raMUN, COLL1161 Member-, and Mvy'tar': S*tttlt'11'lc'trlir+:rts tti1,4a h.tce i:OIIIrtltttitl lcr 1I,:Jlill isle 11'c t ]la aii :"trrtlrntt�litw ["utter 6or ("r,rr-wil hcwingt ~ill 2""1 titrutkt. I'll it+c l LNIFi Olss cw tlxlt I rt t ir11 t1itlLtic is frrltl[tC) ire tiLli7tplEolrt r11 htt elint trul'li+ �:Srn ;; Ntion assurrled by the modcl mij 1Ut .ttiju*t %1 liTr obv't't,ts WId krloww ct)rltlittcjn; I urrr 4t�llctirnl�l dlttt t11at hEin,t al�tplic-atitan t3l't.+ll'-Ilt� thclt`rahs' ica.l bat cd model Uils rte retlect Aviuw c.%i�Lntg V'.trN s.Munilital '.It Meath Jaws. rendering iLs dcrki I,Lil. ' cull`01alkTttw tm irltiaLd r i4-- s %L�i, tlpp,tretlt_ nusilL is t l.it4 ri MPQCt :ltN clelut-c•.h atiglr in c%Ftascytr rtes` hcc:tli-W the 111.1"Ji um L' triilhlc 1'I:cs b; en me!i — to thte model dogs lint inc-orpt}rsalc MOUr.itivrt ws a la c. the con( -,I wu,m wtluId he invalid) Ili- mere chs,::rtiatlon. DevelopeCs lvo—~ concla cion thm trafilic salur-itirin s -on this er tritli.ti r'Ir'T�'d'i lS (,]Il ' a�, {flit reliabtr. lcc %o! at4ti+�1°-sslTlll'cZtifin. ticc�arIIdI tit%vcItrpcxaPPIies'°national IN ;tect'ptt.! Idild tits%: rates from the. trap OL!nerat.on. )11'h I ciiticsn (I VL. ?I11 } Page 19 1 ratV c. It uLcw flit nilr7 hL he -159 {iu�elliu unit '111i'ttasc I as Tlrc Stale `IrRlt:pc'tttIml varl ble' 10 t--,Tlrn.glC rlew trips c%p— ndc:d tiom the proposed prcrl cL arld "19_' dvwllir�- t ntl; in Ph4m,,,, ? a: the sale "independent vwiable"to "timate tw%v trip; (aNpcndtd iTtim the pra11AWtI PTO jcc;L. P"N, 19.34. This rcmIis in Phi tse I rn0MirrL LN !O i' rates oI- and evcnmR IN! it F1 roes XW51. And, Pha nm� 2 t11oming Birt M. T rates ctit'';I`{e'� aI e cling IIv OL.T1- rt, 67,11). Aecordingtti . Det,el,-il eI. etiaultizttttw past projecrs after all 1.1iww-) vI' the develnpmerI to he I\'OUT rate* Io luta147' 1 it) moTli lnps w id 15'190 eveni119s. This book r -plate muds) generlce.d analysis comenictilly itplores lie%clop r s vv6n estimtaic" uI' st aul- ubilr d -vi and I&s extrztjwa 1n1cd Irt)rlr pieulnc*tl 1-mi,4ing qpaCC5 UIVJ un-sueel I parkin", � us well as knomgn or, — ainarblc IIIII.l �l,e�iil rc to 111c rcgiti�ti:jbatlt ()cc parlcti HTId ti whi fc mvrrcrship ainl u_wage C1ltC ttw uur e e t I lartiflii earttl�iunit - I Dcr,�-eluper'r; reil.vrts cii,�Ivrwe critical data ibnwghom [he report in a prc►]'urMN clisclosum much of clic data k Lrbscurcd aril himdlers candid artaksrs requited by the -vlcg and statutes. For (�,"Irt1I+te- data [hal i5 di I liecrll to extract Iron, the aarmtIvc of the report so -'ems Lcl disl}art?- t[rr Itraa lk I ,tijreralcd resulss prescnted by Lk, Pc%42lorwr us cited L1110% e. �.l i]c' :1111ch crltil al dala is sties*wont d in the rcpolet, it talvrs a ciinsidlerahlta i. lomc rcadilig of -rct a�s tiit� H rtt:e� rtfyin�the enti[ trtl VI`11W rEpwrt. cross r�Calu ghiss to ul w'�rwin 1ho Irlaaivriatl lttct;,. N �arclitl twidywis w,kd veasd ijable infeTewos drams from thi, tll,rtu Ma4rst 1[jat e+ em Jh:s-; irtdl [dCdl lacy% L Otll r aiiel JIV CIPIICIL Sions rrl tched h4 I )cvc 4)per> h2ldl ttppliwrjtic►rt crl'thc na:ttictnal slal,IAlcil model. 11 wo corisicl,:r l[t�' varn1vt o1 ctwi lirv7:`[4+prr ;!4. IIi;- 1.71,' w011 dce,iLllaicc l par1:1ttp sp.tcea .jls nr.11tis lir:€+rtl.�s +hriIWS. t ";: L,i: • r '.13 . r;. 1, ,; Ill €EI. r4l�tytt I r�rlu�►cr alAl e;•rr� drf represenI Il ht• 14wi itll:lp.? parki114 srQ5icid:r111 unit, rd:.,".{Ir.i€r:,: .•t the si c 11t'Ill e Emit if onc tnkel the li'rri °ai piaci• tc+t?LIff 111C alX3 tll5j r d throughdjul lltc Wirrtar4e dui tht^ 10l,r01, lwvelo7vF proposcs: 17.1 FOR RENT Unib. _ ll are t.NII (' w Sltaries ill lwigl.hL All ar%' 1 units lir 1c),trpr'int 122 are ? l led r m) m s lkI It+int T'Iijriti hart it°I Al Lill side bN, *ijo lilac upa"nrrtt hjlilding; 52 arc 3 BtArtrtrrns n lk'ir1rd ills {� Fwt I'Ln llt^ :II in mt111iples. side by side kine opartrnent htrilcl tIg 1114 rmLrkiI: e, [l'rrjill}irit-d 1-tPlak FOR 191'N I unif!t i;_'. strut-, 41`'t1 Iic:JA-kI;1 �4S I'r,rkint Sp-licc- 87 GioupieJ Lots 274 For Sale Units. M are;-%vti (') sWries in blight. 34) are thrcc 11) stories in Irrig'ht. 4 :111 :tr4 � �h*iFS POT ti►��t}�nnl 147 rlty 2 Iledroom s 2'A lirtlttirLMIS 04"1 l'k)c�% Iprims but in moltipics. si4k by %i& like npYlmail hteildipn , 52 are 3 BcOrunms I �h'r I3L"41rS�i.�ha}. 2� L""; 111-Ints but in sitlk h} L'ide like aparwicrit huilcitno spaQt-s r? u.11 its 1 N1;11 il,44 r U1145 I: Tib 'z �*l t,�-,uy-�• r:! ;��: ti.•:t;t,�t _ I :�I►pt4arw stcti[itu'h[,e(l Ir�.r Iil �' k�e�3resr,nt i•��t` �:Ylc UnnsidCr` l'h.Lw I - W%clul'ci prop wiv—, w btalal up h 5K units in Pha I - "f'h&�Q I 61x111 ItleltICIZ rill F inial unit, and 5tartw Solo unils." I `sirs rhi,; cNtrrrl►ey1,mLN1 c x,j IOr pitr•Ix w tips " aloe, Dciclop cr antieipatcw 348 pur•kiny for Mts-: I PTN`lAI c- and 17'18h unitr,ir: ' spmcsl Ph;xw 1 patkims waccs for SzkLF-'Nlgr units, 1 17a1`ti 520 vChicics in phai 'c 1 This number dne� not consider ij)e si niflewit strrw.ei parking, that Dewltiper A Al anticirkxtc, ILh a4jciirt oral resic:lc:nl owlwd v6:lticle', of % Reviewing Devcictippers pr(xjcet��ti Ir~IYf�i` rates, C?ovloj)er's tiff -the shcli`tCttr& Proj"Ut 1'h,r�c I Ir orainL, lNlOU I rateq to'? ,90 and c%-rnirkg MOL IT r_ktex 8'67;'5 l _ The restilt5 tom ft -ti nalionaI haiitir-plate riik,del % xXpeet Als TO helhevc thar twa,l� no rm'ore I C,I S of !hese v liicles In phase I will leavo Mr work at tush hmir.' And that docNtt't eves. ti:unAer line-h171cis rh.m cvm mow than ma cars or 6 isitur- 5 This resttlf :s. sit ctt u -s, c,srnlx undeal. for the s.rrw rcasorks. by the fucL 1:haL it way, 1.1rA to rmcll similar re5cllls ill PhOW 2. 1 1'has,c hdS a re1ra:611; ag 1903 clrlits with Z Rnrhing spi c; pur unit 1tu, j1 total cif -776 rayk-ing tifssleey- Revitvl'in1'. DCVV10111=rs pr0jCa:tcj traffic Titres_ Devolopor', uIT the sf1;`1J' 11 utiel Proj.et P113{c. 1 111omirg IN `t }1'� I rubes of 21 0,,69 a11t1 67i.a9. ['his u11derscores r4hr the lnts&l miu.lysis is inudecluale where ol)scrvablt wid ascertainohle kwal Ivgi+.tit1j1dam is avall:ahle and wcstllcf s1pmilii;wttrl) change the eonclu-'101-1.11 111I 11141ac:tion. l"r:ual<.lti', l �elicec ihat the 0evulorv.r s t1i1Tic nal hoititr-plik- ;-.101IL-I CLOnljt,..101'� lk in the iace a�f aal rr a11s11:Ll7Ll ;r1sa.+:rt��iFt:�111(' Racal data on cfTtt lc u1 wy-c girl It11.;11 110L'10111VI-t tl i:0f1c 11i011w. I Ilm ohl crwet.l. anJ :ilr1•{site who, c tre* it, clritc A kvorki !r --Avis neightX)rhon1l its the Kona tlr ;i c"11 4Fh�tirs,. irtglO-frinlil� arrsrki4-s kv, roo- 11c116have thrt: (il) Or duper car"i per ra�:illa:na c. Wv carlF w dismiss vur own 1,nal 11111 tivotkers rcni iii,; often Jure' single, Inc.+rn.sr114 Frt ruc �ri 1U0 0r R10fe rec erw I.ven ('en IjN Battu IrulIt the 2111() l_lS COMM rh,1i i, 'lli11.ds ill S.stu FEIlsrtranc'tsctit)nl titil';I Frl.IJ .n Ek�t41xr's I 017- ti111 rh1 thzll Mkiltiplc h, Fuwlih ,lk: iix; iikh4ts marking. 1to ust!htt4ti•A 2 4chicies. Aar nal varz- rl d 18; ,, of the hou,chvlclx 1'1:1,1.; ,.sr rtuare vcfiickc-s ."'kCcarding ii -r this l 11 oar old C.cu,,us [1k "„ ofThe workers jrr, L: to w•s>•rk 1lirna. 117'1'11 �arjvvlvd .md m11% (W... -n wok public trmisportation It lIlls. curwllry L'17rr11:ds?j ,mi Lxiwc rl ap hi ,1ri(1ll 01'8 110t%tl anal sis itrtpttc.T t1l0del 1 3'3XCt OTO dirt tl-te observahlc and irifcrrt:d daw ti<.lnt.Ancd in I)evelc1pus repasrt could viold a canc lulic111 o traffic i1111j�.rt ti�.a i ` rir,t,:w l t. t e I'°11erLltictirlstl harill"r-119aterncsti+:1 ctaTtCltlitats, it is likely tl1i �t llra)crlr k'4111LlMICd soCi171+eic31 sl-ud} and ratl>dcl would sh,tiw even gl-c lcr 111111act. I hclil.— 111x' on-littin? 10CA Sociological duLa fitom tlst�� cslculaticsrls grussl� urFclere,%L1n.11es the t..-:.ift;c impiAk:1 4st`ftl . cic%-;Aol°sniou:and �iulute4The iwended maXtc Ofthe legislrttit,n 10 ilrestiidc wnase T- has a remair:ing Lm umi5 with ? parking Vases per a ns t for a total of 276 parking 5paCeS 4i -v pwinc fteartt)pvvs Pic! P ;ted traffic ra[e5, rlevetppL-r'S Off All e Shaul lnOdd prods. Phase I frroriting INJID01 PS of 21 69 .end e•,eimP6 b,%,39 31 Ibis with a 1'Kport.lr.;HraII IV roiltcrin, tlic tnv-Iroatn%!jrlxl Irnl?Ft��: trI%k'r tlW ]D1► I ask this Nilo Inti Fol knv its duly to ealirrrc. ;I riiol ,I j i c I ly shcn TClLq)nal L% r.-4uir�Encnt.%that the. em-tronrnental asscs.w%w repurt provide accumie. mcuilin fi.rl and dwJ .► d anal}sis of the }3lSi i al, 9,-K491. hl%umcM. ccimLimic, ukd nuiural rcmnvL :c 0011- sequences o1-thc propas:;cd LtL:tiasrt. (Sty HRS §243; COIIN*j'Y RULE 14) 3. In IhC Kana Vistas suMivision, the prorl oNal lroro'itxt rcli':i on the Uie rt �uhstanda'-d tv, Llv,�4w, Krkuana'cm Plack., Kektiana'ila I'lUa:; isvc.j-,~ s(cei,%I'..t5 litt><itccl,Er±i�� +�a lana tle to extrerne c-irrttti 'Oki iw 115krr IW vvitlt 110 NIJC%r:r.lk4, I he intll:tet cit irlcruttwa.L:ci lruflic artsing from l'h.i,se I and PhasehuildoUb of Lilt; Roy La Visltt% Housing Proj'ccl is rreuckqu.4tcI% addresscti3 In the SSFNi Tta.Ilu: Impact Anal)5is :Rerwi. which MI iII'kPZILt.-" ZJ',okra; yuvert Kti uthurtt:uk l I ligItwsv. I aril jmnicularh. conce.rt ed thm titling rrLnrrtr°k-mis wIlEVIC trips to rtrlcl from a �,qxrstatte suINIi%-Isicm will present cargos artd k;ollgcstioct lo residents, aluny KCkLt,trt. O t Platte. I Ct1IIS; dCF t.ta l t1 f'Idmiin6 Depart-mcal should regwre the ,ypplicaut to address thoso ct fwcr11: t1 DRAIA' I"l f: 'v'li ti `' ll l 'l'.' 1_. ASSES SNII M i-CgLLSreScvLtlu t6ukt tkf, aut oak+L. €tthcrs. rrc.hwmc rrrtj�nic"tt, Sit, '11 flor MIcnion c"hwige or a P)pi4hb,-,jcj{-1i1th's- . Ge Chapter 1 1-204M "1 ILIAaii Adminismili++c Itulrs_ Instead of SLjlI eJN':)CRI SMI)VI tht'`se il,xcre,- hIlWe��rr. the l kAt"i I=�VIRON-M-:NIAL ASST-_NS!r�il .l~w I intpl- iLrrcarrs fktr1. r:laimrn , drat "No ad4ers., s, - -)ndar ' effects are e-zpected silnck the dcviAL jnCnt wA-)V]cf utiIize cxsstinp irtl"r:�:.swocture. rnhl1 hcusiuv. Fmd il� nr+t expard Inti rtstrlI 111 ':�J114tarti4 detrutnds to t.'ourtlv If is as€:riousit:.ct')!J ttz it_+r the 1)RAFT 1:\VIK, ).'•tNIF'N'-CM AS'Sl-:9SNIE:N 1 to far l Loa addrcss tate pvtential acivvr.3%� rt -1l, CII-, raf irtrrc,:=,1ns; the kl-W n1` sul�LLkrtda(d existing LWYA+trticatrre. like k:el:uatta' art Plttre, 7 I tic 1.1kAH E\%'IRO- NNUIN IM., Y1 F:SSMFN"F aLlJivc sc"-_ advercc 1rat11ic impam tinIy lit tIte eunk n%k oI' whether dw PTQJeel wouId J lve io •,rpl7aifm! lira UJW.r'tie elf e cI car, puhhc heolih. ne Applic.t.rwt c;1mms. "I he Pr(IN',Qd 1"ro jest VLOLI cl not aticcl pi.Jolic IILAt ilc LU14 mmy: storm Ater would be aappropriatelic dispwti cd tial ila dralage stirilctrtr's_ Er -dr _J.- e i m pac 15 hawrc been La k6111"1163 .,.,f Lu t.-`' ydfigr inprcrjert tiesia.'' Fniphasis added. This bald Cf)IICILtSIUCI dcvs rum addruss IkUtenrrril ndverge, imrrArts as required by ChApler 1 1-200,1-1:*, Hawaii A driunistrative 1+ules• 0 1 Itc I'Itrlltili 15011 0CLcpl lhi` I)Rr1FT EN-VIitONNII N I Al ASSF.4S1`9'4k• , t :, r0i l<< c +c. tllw S FNI TrAiit Inirlaci .Anulvsk l:{e;lxirt. ww`hit:.iT ITfi'4 the 1011OW419 l,Iciieieraci��- .� I:t litre tca�iii4lr�ss a ciwcr c Ml lic ian}xryci tialhin the Kotia VkLw subdivision, ,lrisinL! t'rom the lirtkjcw:t: h. I he %I Tud'l is IiIll pact s wd,. 1�,:T,Irl cacti =; VIFLON111 t:ne c'lI I `''*, in cc)mrist To the '9°u w'LmLlf tette eniplc ved by the 018 Witclwi hin�inecrin-, Tr:�ttir Impart Analysis Rgori. Tra1`tit, c'a` Uik stiim ,s ivy), timisitive w grt-wdi mi;e In a Tion@Iriwar. ;,'xjx,w latl;ll rcl:itiM}fl: C, Me S,;]F%i Tnifflic ImpacT Analy§is Repc rt tlLies not reCogilltc r11tllIi•velrcrrat14•1:1a1 housing Ouu'st Wristtes cumnlon u -t 'l lawts,jii according w census data and likeh ku1�►restirTt.tic� daily tielticic tilps attributable to builtlow of they pruT.Kt cl pr(Iect: 1 The SSI'M I rallie Irnp.wt A nritV-I;m R e Ixi rt cmpIoys an unusitaaII% In %etiic•It: volumQ of 853 %_, irles Ical \nrthhRaualrl Oete:Gll KakJll.maim hiiVIrWav cin the-AJUCICd (J4A s Of April 31(1. 0I c}, tit ti+wL'ckda# ami A4ust 24.. 011), a SanLrday_ c omrared %%ith Ilii" 2111I X Witchcr ELIE611cerillo I raflic Impact=knalvNis Repeal. %vfilch wptrrted 1057 xehicles lar.lwitlaii- 14 and 15, 2016, KO w eekLim's• t he unusLuallwv lctww rgxtirtcd vehicle volume kit 95 x i3 a1su cit Odds, %iih f i.,�u�� � k�i' Ilse titiF'[�t �i'�!•1p�: lltt�a�t �1.ttaryl�•sis I��.n. ��-hich �he�}o•s c��,�r�,xi�fi,;�t�fy I U:��.J w�iti�•Jc• per licrur in 01h Ir,r 4Orthl'MALIul QUCen Kxtltutt mu llighwi), at 7 a -m. I he di ferrwrrc:t� ira voItime i� more than double thy- m axittlunti 111"fit %ariatiwi Vcncrat1.• accepted it, d>1}-to-ciaw III CaStrreintrrts wil-I ihi, li onroliable_ z. The recommendation h�' ISSIA'I -1 ral'i is Impact. r"4ria V5-> Pe xyrt for a ro'ttndaSoW at Quec!o €c; iahuinanu Iiighwuv and I ILIAI.Llax Tic+sal ltiCA11 I is incnna imorrt tai#h the 1r'affllc c i�ITif it Interizellk)nw thai puss �warrurits IML tcn1i�Itirc uirwil~rt��ii�cti l'irescnl traf iC'�Ifor lijbilii% comci rrn :•s,r Lhc p,.,r'efm1'cr,.: '91 -w- recommendation M �Sl"M 'I rtrl IC IIIip.tc;t ,'Vtud) Nis ReIAO tOr ntorworllig n1 the immeot.itm of(.1i,ea l,�aahumanu liit,_h wui , araC] Kti�LLir7i Kg17rw;iY is IMICICLILIilc. Whvly, tiff heiv.mr imerseciion pwi-ws more thou mit warrant order all conditions, it A urld b,; priuritil.ed rc�I :ltlxl� tlrcl cl il:cc of a 5i I iur iitsullation This cimun•isiant %viII lay Lml h} th l)t'irf,L1-rd I,10JL',,l r. In sum. I.[w- [X411 Assessment and S" N1 I M111c inlpa+:t ArWSill I#eport CILVi 1101 Pnr:nLVllt i;fejihle ruct� anJ an: l i 9LLch that the ad%,erse iil pol* t)rl cxisiirw inlr�islrttrturc wir:1 resulting tioni iacreasccl traffic cwi be full% wtdcrsioml earl resuh w apprupriiau gov rnriieni lilainnui r-md mspc+nsu, I declare under Nstallw' of perjur) ilial the lbrcgoing iy true. Dawd: Kallua-Kona, Hawui'i.00TOBER R_ 20'11. l�rint Cl rr.,rr5�" 4 t 1`li? F 1.:1' t'H [ A41AUDOCK 4 Septerr'rber 13, 2021 Stantec ConsulFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek f$QS) 494.2039 Mr. favid Blcrncett- oddock 76-101 Kamehamalu Street Kailua Kana, HI 96740 Via email; dbmkono:� ac�l.corr7 RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONS1 for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kona District, Nagai"ii Island Dear Mr. Felix: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed prcject. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1: 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the DEA). I cam specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts Doth within and w4hoot the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIA R. Response 1: Specific comments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment 2: 1 am concerned that the findings of 'no significant Impact (LEA-AFNSJ) is not supported by the facts. I am concerted that Developer's IDEA Study is proforma, setting forth declarations in boilerplate fashion while obfuscating, omitting or material facts and analysis. Res nse 2: Please see detailed c:on�n-ieri s _in specific resource sections below. Comment -3: The DEA omits an estimate of population demographics and the total expected population totals, actual dollar estimates, assigned for any sales prices or rental prices, estimate for completion dates. The DEA does not address recreational space or defensibility of living space. The DEA ornits observable data of known flooding and fails to address or adequately describe haw his development will address the consequences. The traffic analysis emits and fads to consider observcble and ascertainable Iccal data. Response_ 3: Regarding population demographics. Table 3 in Section 3.4 (Socloeconomics) of the EA includes existing papulation dato for the state,, county. and North Kona Census County Division which are the areas the project is located within. An estimate of occupancy at project completion would be speculative for 450 multi -family units. Justification for modeling inputs for the size and number of units are included in Appendix 2 (Traffic Impact Assessment Report). Regarding cost for sale and rental units, the units would be rented or September 13, 2+021 Mr. Dav4d Blancett-Ahaddock Page. 2 of h sold at market prices and cannot be determined at this time. Regarding construction schedule, Section 1.2 states that construction could start as early as third quarter of 2021,.following Plan Approval and construction permits, and would be expected to last 12 to 18 months. Regarding recreation, Section 1.2 describes that there would be two community centers including a pool and facilities and in Section 3.3.4 it states that landscaping would provide safe and adequate recreational space for residents. Kona Three has a long-standing record of coordinating with agencies to meet requirements for the project, and would continue to do so as stated in the EA. Regarding flooding and drainage issues, the EA explains existing conditions and h --w Kona Three is working with DPW to address these, and how the project would not exacerbate these issues (see Sections 1.2 and 3.3.2). Per Section 27-20 of the Hawaii County Gude, the project is not allowed to increase any run-off onto neighboring properties, so there are nc effects an any neighbors from project run-off including on the County -owned parcels. Specific comments on the traffic report are responded to below. Comment 4. 1 am concerned that that blind application of off -the shelf statistical based model fails to reflect Obvious existing traffic saturation at peak tunes, rendering ils derivative calculations as invalid. Response 4: The methods for the traffic analysis completed in the TIAR for this project follows widely accepted industry stondards - from the data collection, to the growth rote, to the use of HC. Independent comments provided by Professor Prevedourcus on the EA (which were included in a separate comment letter) agree with many of the traffic analysis methods and approaches for the project. The TZAR uses HCM methodologies to analyze the traffic impact in a numerical sense. There are limitofions to the improvements that can be made. The northbound queue seem to be a comment made a lot by residents. Those comments are recognized. The adding of a few vehicles, or the modification of a traffic signal will have little impact to the network. Signalizing unsignalized intersections may cause more dela--, . The main problem is the capacity of a two-lane Highway, and if/when the widening will be completed. The widening of Queen Kc'ahumanu Higl',,vay will likely lead to the most improvements in the delay, and this project has beer- planned for o while_ The TIAR recognizes the impact of the widening, but Kana -,tree LLC does not control over that. Comment 5: The traffic analysis applies "nationally accepted land use rates from the Trip Generation, 14th Edition OTE, 2016)'". This boiler -plate model venerated analysis conveniently ignores automobile demand, parking, traffic impacts. and data specific to the region about occupancy and vehicle ownership and usage specific to our west Hawaii community. Response 5: It is hard to predict if a 3 bedroom house will have 10 people with 2 cars, or 3 people with 4 cars, or be unoccupied with 0 people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus_ The institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip September 13, 2+021 Mr. Dovld Blanceft-Ahaddock Pace 3 016 Generation Handbook was used and low-rise and mid -rise was considered. Low- rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very low standard deviation and an R -squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection for the project. The ITE trip generation handbook is the accepted practice to develop trip generation and distribution and future projections. Although some units in the development could have more than 2 vehicles, not all units will be occupied or have vehicles. It is impassible to predict hovel many cars will be in the development. We can assume a max number, which would be the total number of stalls provided. But the parking capacity will probably never be at 1()Q%. Also, not all vehicles will leave or enter the development during the AM and PM peak, which is when the TIAR is analyzing. The ITE trip generrat[on handbook analyzes many developments and produces data points and a best fit curve. This Is used for the traffic projection for this TZAR. Comment 6: In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies on the use of a substandard roadway, KekuanaoQ Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very sfeep, has limited sight distances due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of inc-reased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is. inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Kaahurrranu Highway. I am particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 6 Kekuana'aa Place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the same specifications as all other Kana Vistas roads, including paved swales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana`oa Place from Royal Vistas Phrase I as designed as the connection of Kekuono'oa Place to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuanc'oo Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peale period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana`oa Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Commernt 7: This IDEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores thern. It is a serious orni"ior) to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana'oa Place. Response 7: Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for ora -island residents as described in Section 3.7.1: of the EA. Regarding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekak�na'oa Place is the Phase Il outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the AM and PM September 13, 2+021 Mr. Davld Blanceft-Ahaddock Pcge. 4 of 6 peak hours, respectivelyj. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EAj. Comment 8: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have ca substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicant claims, "The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; storrnater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response B. The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sections os they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in Part 5: Findings and Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. Comment 9: The planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kona Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Respome 9: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 10: The TIAL uses a growth rate of 17a, in contrast to the 2% growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAL. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a non-linear, exponential relation. Response 10; Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show on increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2024 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1% growth rote. Although we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2%, our traffic engineers used 7 % from the 2025 LRTP forecast. Comment 11. The TIAR does not recognize multi-genercationcI housing characteristics common in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 11: It is hard to predict whether a 3-bedroorn house will have 10 people with two cams, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and nc cars, or if residents will use the bus. The Institute of Transportatian Engineer's SITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and love -rise and mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housirg wos, used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use has a very law standard deviation and an R - squared value very close to 1.04, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. September 13, 2+021 Mr. David Blanceft-Ahaddock Page. 5 of 6 Comment 12: The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen I~aahumonu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repol 1, which reported 1057 vehicles for January 14 and 15, 2016, hath weekdays. The unusually law reported vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 20T6 for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu Highway cit 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximum 10% variation generally accepted in day -to -clay meosurernents and thus unrrslicible. Response 12: The most recent Historic HDOT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kochumanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Road ana Hualalal Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to the 2016 HDOf count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if the Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is undercounting, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those provided in the 2016 HDOT Count, Comment 13: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Koahumanu Highway and Hualcalai Road (North) is Inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns for the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kochurn anu Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes mare than one warrant under all conditions, it should be pricritized for study and design of ca signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project Response i3: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices IMUTCD) states, 'The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of ca traffic control signal.'' There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such cis the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric teasib lity, and others. The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection moy warrant ca signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also he noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. September 13, 2+021 Mr. Davbd Blancett-Moddock Page. 6 of 6 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by ernall. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.❑. mich4ele.lefebvre4stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mogi, Ashley From: Allison tte"nett -info a@b1issinbdOCrtrt.cam, Send: Tliurs-Jay, Grtohei 08. 2020 3:31 Pit To: Plarmi rg intrrnet Mail Subject Royal Vistas Housing Project EA cc+rrments re'. Traffic 1. ALLISOIN T3ENNE7T. declare: am a residcnk of KaIItia-Kona' lwc+113 Vi=taS uIN] lV1SIOn. CoUlltY 0f Haw 91'i. State of IIttwtti'i. The pru used land dc,s elorment pr(Ject that is the subject of the Nndrrig Dralt Etttisust etlt�i .�4s �4�cncitt sUbMitte d by Royal V oas Iloulsing Project Tax Niap key Nos. l3)1 7�6-021;016, 7-G-021:11'7. 7-5-n2 1 -019, uiod 7-0-021.1.11() dearth Konta Distrid, Hawuai'i 1slancl' State vrTlawai'i al_lecLS ilie perso t7ally as W :11 asaITUCts 111 i111crest in real prcxprtrtw, I rt -;Oe w Elmn 1011 varcl5 of the prolvied lantl do-Ocipttluill Project. III Such capat;idea. I bve firsthand knoww 1c&,c of tate ft)llatwii1g Cads a3wd cai dd i.nid would testify thereto if caned upon to do i,o- 2. i have reviewed the reading DRAFT- ENVIRONXf I -XI Ai..,%�SFSSN'IEN I mckiding.the i'ra1"iic Impact Analvsir' Roport by S4s'FIVI Illxemation.11, dated July 020 and atti[C]tL•ct .c4 .' lipcildLN . tl.r R. F'F ENVIR(3N'kriEN'lAL ASSIiSSNIENT. 1 Lurt spe cific:aliv concemrti ahk+ui asperse traftic lnlpact5 hr,tll wwill'in and wwr-ilhout the Kura Vistas suhdIVINicttl 11Mt are t}a)t fully or ac"rately 3ddressed in Ilici SSFIei Traffic Impact Arid':vsrw Rclxirt. TraF is Mittel the SSC I 'I'rai:Fic Impact Analysis Deport. are discussed in the body ofthe DRArT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. at pp4S-56. 67 and 71. 3. to thc: Kana Vistas subdivision, the propersad projim reho on th4v use ()I*asubstaridard rnadway, KeIcuanai'cia Place_ Kekttana`oa Place p. vay steep, has lunitcd sight distances due to cydreme carves and is rtarrow with no sidewalks. TI ie inip act of 1nc:rt: AsW Ira I is arising from Phase 1 and Blase --' k uiIdo tits of the Royal Vistas lousing PrIoJect is inadequately addresmA in the SSFM Traffic linpact Anatly&is Report, which focuses instead on impacts al ing Quevii Kauhvmanu Highway- I ram particularly concerned that adding 1 :16975 ilumurows vchiclQ trips to uod f'rc-ail a atparlte subdiv-isien will present dangers and rA)r �cstinn to residelts iabnp Kekti.ana,ea Place. I consider that 1hc Plunning; L%f ar(iiwnt wh«uld requiro the applicant to address these c oncums, 4. The DRAFT ENVIRONl'td11 NTAL ASSESSMENT requires evaluation int; amnag others, adverse sccorrdal-v imi-k -t.s, - tUch czs Prai-aIdatiarr c•iuingm Or of i -C -1.s On Public.fkifities. aqg Chapter 11-1-00.1- 13, Hawaii AdministraUvc RuWs, Instead of's€Tuarely addressing these Msties, however_ the DRAFT ! NVIRONI MENTAL ASSESSMENT simpl� ignures them, claiming that ",No adverse scccmdary effects are cxpceLcd siru:c the dvvt:Ioptiwn( wouId Lit iIizc cxiisting infrastructure. providc infill housing. acid in nit expEewd to ressilt It) 1,11110tititittl d munds. to C oatyty semiccs." It is a svTiuuw omission for the DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSE'SSMEN'i' to fad to addr !.the rxatc rin; l cuiveme tnipaets orinereasing the use.• cat' 5tahst;jntLiIs(•%kfng infrastructure. like: Kc'kWLM1'0V Klatt. The DRAFT EN11TRONMENTAL ASSLSSNIENT acltlresw5 tid%efseIraf'fic 1111patetsc1111y to the Conluxt ul4 nether [lie prlalec:t Would Have 1Wl'e'1 Wj j Ublic-healih. The Applicant claims. 'rl"Itc; Pwp4 .wd Projuvi would not affect public health in any way; stormwaier would be appropriately diisposed of in draenagU stnicttaraS. 1'1",k It i:Imiel� N_ivv lxLm lak Qn ritoYcareful consi&j'ation in pru�vit dam" Emplkasib, ad&l . This baled cottcluston dots octt address pw►wi Ufl ndvenx IM11r1cm as rucltilred by Chapter 11-200.1-13, Hawaii Achninisirative Mules, ti_ f hie Nanning Ikpartment should riot aaccptthe DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT's reliance on the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report_ -which has the Following duficicaul : proj=t a. failure to address adverse tragic impacts within the Kona Vtstas s-abdivi.3ian arising from the. M. The SSFP4�1 f r:�ttEc ]mpar t Analysis RePtart uM< * a rrc�wlh rile of 14'a, in contrast to the ') u growth tate employed by the 2019 Witcher EnjpneertnTraffic congest on is tery sensitivc to growth rate in a uon-1inmr, exponential relation., I;. Tltc SSFM Tralliiw Ittapact Analysis Rc;pon dr cs not recogaize multi -generational hou.:sing ClmractLM'stles common in Hawaii a mxirdin tO cCrtstcw data and likely and roslim atle , daily ac:hrcic trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project: d. The SSFM Traafftc Irnpaac:t Analysis Repots mpIoys an Lin usu alIv lo%v vohicle vrklutue of 851 vehlules for Narthhound Queen Kaahumaaii haglrway on the selected dates of April 30, 2(119 a weekday and AtAg rst 24, 2019, a Salurday, compared wit.h the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic impact Analysis Rcptrrt, which rerwirted t 1157 w-ehiicles for January t4 and 15,22016- b(ith wetdavw. The LUILIM I I"' 1OV, rupmled vehicle volume ot'8 3 is also at odds Nvth I'irrc 4 of the SSFM Traffic Impact Analysis Report, Mich shows .apprlltUz1d1,CIV ICJ 11 VC11ICIC', per lat)ur aar -2o 16 l'or Nvilhbound QLccn K aaaltuni ariu I Iigl~%vay tit ? u.n1. VII datierea " tai VOIUMC is more than double the m xirnurn 10%' variation. generally accepted ira t1¢ay-w-day talU Ltell101US a;Id thus tattrJil th!.. e. 1111 by SSFM Traffic Ifr pace :Inalkvaw iteport for i roundabout at Queen Ktraellu111!1RU FLIL!hti4•UY I:trl llk,Alilleli IkLl4ld {Noilh) is 11WVflSiSttwrat With 111 ti-utl ti' LL''IIdOr. lttteSCCLIOns that P S warrants but rcatmahk un,,ty til"vLl l>1L':.'C111 9r.sl"lay s:IfLlIiAbllit ' it-,• !l ti ! �Ft .'I11wcnt; €. The recorrtm ntl;ation by SSFIMIl Tral3ic Impact Analysis Deport for ntionitonrtg of the iia ars ction of Queca Ka:alivmunu Hig.liw;ay and Kualcini Highway is inaclqu ale, �', ht!rc, as heart-. -aaa micr.we ion pa.scw more than one warrant tinder all conditions, it should be prioritized tsar study aatcl desiga of a slVal Cor installation. This circunist;,ance twill ba: exacerbatud by the proposed pruiect- 7. In sum, the Draft Environmental Asmcssmcnt arid SSFM Traffic Impact Aralysis Rc-on clots not present -,uf icient, credible facts and anal ys s such that the adverse impacts on existing, inEastmeture and resulting ftcaa:xt increased traliic can b•c fully understood aad result in appropriaatc So%vritinont rlamiitag and response. I declare tanner penalty of ptijury that the tore ging is,bur-. Dated: Kailua-Kana, Hawaii, Cklohai 8, 2:120. Respectfully. Allison Bennett 3 1�1 I , ^ , - , C " , ! , J. ". , , CA, 4 September 13, 2021 Stantec Consulting Services Inc. P.O. Bax 191 Hila, HI 96121 Tek J808) 494.2039 MS. Allison Bennett Via email: into( blissinbloom.corr RE: Traffic Comments on draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas dousing Project. North Kona District, Hawai'1 Island Gear Nis. Bennett: Thank you for the comment letter mated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment (DEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kana Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific cornments for traffic impacts are discussed below. Comment -2., In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies cin the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaaoa Place. Kekuanaaa Place is very steep, has limited sight di5ionces due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidewalks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koahumanu Highway. I cm particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Picice. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2. Kekuana'oa Place is a County -awned read built to County standards, with the sarne specifications as all other Kora Vistas reads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impact on Kekuana`oo Place from Royal Vistas Phase I as designed cis the connection of KelcuanWoa Place to Royal 'Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAL estimates a fatal of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuano'oa Ploce during the ANI Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roua�Iy one additional vehicle on l:ekuana'oa Place every 4 rninutes for the peak pariods, which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2021 Ms, Allison Bennett Page. 2 of 4 Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as papulation changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increosing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like K.ekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or Time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7, i of the EA. RogcFding potential traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauno'oo Ploce is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, icor the A -M and P peak hears, respeafivel�. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicanf claims, „The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way, stormwoter would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." e=mphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sectior;s as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in hurt 5: Findings and 'Reasons, ❑nd accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAL', which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Krona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be segnificont. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%. in contrast to the 2!o growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a neon -linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lang Range Transportation Plan forecast projecNons for 2020 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1% growth rate. Alfhougll we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got 2, our traffic engineers uses. 1 T from the 2025 LRTP forecast. September 13, 2021 Ms. Allison Bennett Page. 3 q Comment 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics con--',c.,r7 in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 1. It is hard to predict whether a 3-bedroorn house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with ria people and no cars, or if resit:. -its will use the bus. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generc; 'on Handbook was used and law -(se and raid -rise was considered. Law -rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use hcs o very low standard devlaticr and on R - squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8. The TIAR employs an unusually low vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahurnanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles, for January 14 and 15, 2016, Moth weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle valurne of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 2016 for I.lorthbound Queen Kaohumanu Highwoy of 7 a.m. The difference In volume is more than double the maximum 10°70 variation generally accepted in day -icy -day measurements and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDQT count ovoiloble in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahumanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Road and Hualolai Road (north). Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to t�)e 2016 HDOT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard tc say if lege Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is unrl oir,ling, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those f r,-)v7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. ComMenrt 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queen Kcohumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns far the government. The recommendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Koahumanu Highway and Kuck ni Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, on intersection passes more than one warrant under oll conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project Response 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCDj states, "The satisfcac_! ,,r, of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal.'' There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility, and ethers. The scope September 13, 2021 Ms, Allison Bennett Ptge.4of4 covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention where an intersection moy warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be noted that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project. The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreclote your review of the document. If you have any additicnol comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2089 or by email. Sincerely, Sfantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele-lefebvre@stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona three LLC alfa Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashl From, Q. Biancelt-maddoc :dbrnkorna@aol corn> Seat: Thursday, October 08, 2020 2.23 PM To: F annl Internet Mail Subject: ROYAL VISTAS HOUSING PROJECT EA COMMENTS Attachnwnts: KV DECLARAT10IN DIANL OC108ER 7.pdf ALOHA. Attached please find my comments to the Royal Vistas EA report_ With aloha, Diane BIancett-Maddock Kona Vista 1.16977 DEC'1.ARAT'[c.')` OF DIANE BLANCETT-MADDOCK I_ Di -arc Bkmcett-i tuidoch. ds --claret I am a rt,., -U mi of Kono ViSTas, subdivision[. Couniti• orllak�ai'i, Slaw W-11-iN `ail, The pros.", cd land developmetu pmjeci that is the subject cel t pcj, iiilg Dvali 1-rrvirw,limcmal A.-,;sk;2,b rima bulnuIItcd by ROV"] %'ertXI, I ItILIilII r Project fax Ccl,y Kc� *pus. 130 7-5-021:171o, 7, 7-0-1i21:019, and T f1-11' 1,019 'Vnrlh Kona District, I Ia'Wi21`t ISkI d. St'Ule u1' 111WW'i r111'eds file lrcrstOallr 4.. M -CII :IN dfl-C:Is m} InLerc'st In real pmprnv. . I reside wnitliin .3 e111-Sc,fthe IKupt:Wd luttd &:wcR1oplimit prckjew 1. III ,lt6At, kaparitic-. I iva'e iirstliarid knoA[ccige of the IAlowing iLos and tutdd gild would tlier'do I I cllvd 11(?i111 Citi do so ? 1 havo. rexiewed the pending IW%I -] I'NVIR(IN N1I?\lf'4L ASSL SSM ENT inuki ing the Trallic Imp icl ; nalysk I quirt h,. k;S1-%1 Internislaonal ( I [A16. dated i~;I y :uld altachca as 21 ua the DRALFT ENV lROhlMENI AL N l' I um 4pe&•iI-ICa[Iy- S;0ju tmQd abotlI Lrwk rqc traffic imp neia. hwth vkiIhin an, I,.% 1how IIw Ktxmu Vi.-a&s sHbd vis' n Ilia( :rrc ito), (4114 or accunwely uddressi t1 in the SSFM 1'rnIfic Im-pact Analysis Report. 1 na,! is and tlty: SSFM Traffic Impact ArtuNs:k Rcporl. arc &svLs:Ned in the N)dv of he DRAFT ENV[Rt�NMENTA1_ ASSESSMENT. at pp. 48-'O. 67 and 71. W"hon this multi- Family Toning was created in 1 land was vacant and the im c.t 4 ildding 450+ multi -family wait" %ould 1101 1w,; Lvol a traffic ismic. H{]woer, iul Z O. t tw :lli':l ]vas been e oveloped and this proposed &-velopruc.rst will have an cxtrCnw1 �r c kc-4Ati��c 1111 ct on the L►ltcad} lrc'sewl inlrUstrrlcture. The proTxxsed c3ew•e1+ pment indic;rtcs a nein-iv._nzdI .d rigb- WITI Orrlw OX4 01110 the Iighwwtse. T1<a�w'�'~'cr. Clic '1 I A R inetlaa'AalLbeS rent raw4•t,rstION r01e('l tar k:onsiklcr the to,3t tlarat .ht b iow ay Us a)ivady ra:tclicd-,aiunat ,d stranvr4 Niairdcws tate I I A R Jous aki�ttatdV adclrtss tae iaupawt to dw abuttini?, nei-h1mrbutxi that }gill he t mussel our it muLes the sotabhnund irallit: 1'i,rt 1-' 1 U1 (hiti ntrrse !L1 -an lOraa IJt tura. Through :r srn.alI neiighhorhokA slrL" 1La the saturated ira!'fit �i���sa.1l :i,, I-ALStreet. uhcrc it will swk up icar;t lett (urn„ fn short. lu cap.uitl pro1wr 3IgrwIization ni thy: primary highway interv,�O,Tn, developer shifts Lbt twurdcn. tOst4 A1141 iratp,•acr cink, its nknghbms and the itlaklcclttatc Courtly irrnalizaanon ,it I .oko Sheep- In 20."(1, CLrtncaa! cotarliii(ms tt'itlaiaut 10 Ll ~*nI 1 Jun -v f.K:rsora:rrtilL� i Ina, iv,� I itticr4t,ctItrn x71 the hi,-huaY rat 1.AlI sirCt i; grid Itic 1.A 11uring non-pc ak rtrSla htwul° ,tK.l !I; l:l.tr impt-ning. c;arl,� afternoon and carly evenInVs The inht rscctiewra as E. ¢ is barel- ubJtw taw curretu lu:rr.i., WIJ Caa1110 kIIINOrb Mly :additional traffic frarn this cievolopinur_ Rec auie thew i no a,:L:c.lerafion lktpc4 in any dinxtion at T_Ac, StfC' t intcr•um. till I.a<ikm Succt imil'ty roust stop Trttrr to k:4I1cTir39 Ific h.iphirvnv. As a result_ ir•affic )1reiCI J-waL--+KS up itat(_� tits: ajjaccrtt raeiPal�1►rluaods. tolh mauka wid trtakai TJ -6 can bQ ohscn•td cvcn 1lC?t , Ewen when are raot e-%lic•..riCV k11g 111L Tarek-iip and discbrugt of childrirta br NOOLA htty�a. art Thar h aavy Imirirl tt atliti w%: tre;IL'C!11 t10ral Ill Under mm cr iarnntine corWiGons- In tliL Komi Vistas stibdivisiva. that 17rup-a .i pa`kajttt relies on the use of•a �tihsl and art'Kekuatla'na 1'lacc, Kektiana`c%a Phwe is vcry stccp. has IIwitcd �tt,!it distance,- tltte tri run cunes and is narro%v wriIli no sidewalks. The imp.a.;:t krf- IIicreatsed tnaflilc trri0. s.[I, tram 1'I%i_re i a I I d Phase 2 buildi)uts iWthc Roo alVkw l-ioustttg Prolf; i is 1 nadcquatclti uddr>~s:,W w thte SI-O.M Traffic Impact Analysis Report. titifuch fiaeuscs i.nstcad crit iatrpu.-:ts Lulota�, Queen K.tahrtaMAILI Iliuhw'34'_ I :am partiLtilaarly cnnecrrt d that adding namierous �,ehicle trilse TO and i -kni a Selma ale %W.-,td1visic)aa will prescrat clarifiers tans! ccngcstiari Lo residents along Kk kla:i.ria`,oa Place. I cm.,I cr thaL the Pl nning Depaninent shmilrl require the applicanr i�) d. 'FEE DP.,- i'T FNVIR(N%I fF=", I .11. 1 4�;w5 iE?wJ'"� rc� uirs a aluuut�n gat'. nm:rn S1Ehw;rc, i7ai�1`ti�'.Sc' �r?�_rr��f��r�r}' i»�}?tlt7.c..t�tL'l+ : rw t�+)j�11?rirr�lA , i7�r�d�?L".1 ttf L'��1f','F5' Cfr� {7iJ�}�PL• ftlL'1frlfc%.5"- wtcCllaptrr f t -20U.1-13, Ilak4Wi AtIininWsil`� IFIS `kUl IICn4luaTely addressrnV these i,suCS, hlrwwvver. the DfLAST ENIVIRON%IPNT'tI A,S1: )SMFM sinipki- tiurv-, (hum. OAiiitIt)" tltA "Nt9;ri veiw seL:cntI,ii� 4II tik, ai I. •I iitt:(:lhC devicIup[rierit w+ri0 d utilize cyisting infrasin.rt,.taire• provide iniill housing. � . � �i 4'.' !o result in sut-Ma iittiLil del ltciiul% III (`iwunty ;t r ice ." Il is ci �:cr'iwv c,niissIcn li]r iIic IlliAF1' ENVI Rt )-N ,lI -'vi I )I ;%KSESSMF.NY to 1'uiI W ALINNs LhL 1%,i 'nIit,i r v6:rse irnl is of iucrua,ing i I w o:e of ~ 11h;%'1A 1arrti 001.,i ng A1Ifr.t.1rue1we- hkv Kk-k u-wu'-:i I' ncr : 5. 11 k l]RAF PNVI.ftCi*vh.' I-XIAI A'SSF,,SSN11~NI addrexs:s atkcrse Irrltiv ivaPAIAr 01111V iri 'Itr Cktllt•at 01 wwltvdlvr they I7rt_juc , %. Il id Hu LrclGvr-wea vjc 'r 4m ,wdliir b::'e1Wr I Ii5` ril piwatrtt eilinis. "I 1w I'itrpti-vd Niijeci 1VL1LJM Mat LflltLul PHNIi he,1111I in ari,6 tvu5: ski: mvm,aer misuld h%: appnipriotck wli rFozs4'd of in rlr.tirw111:6: strttl;ltrrvz-:. Ira ie impacts 11..ivv been talrrrr irttu coreri (mis t erxtio in project design.' Emphasis added, This bald condUSion titres riutaddress; potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11 �. I-1 w. i4. The Plaimitig Depu.rtincrit -should not Gtecept the DRA- i ENVIRONMENTAL ,'" SSESSM \ F; refiarce nr the S4F kf Traffic Impact Analvsis Report. Ahieh has the hc�llt�wvin d,�icieneiesl 3 l. I:tiLJTkf It1 midress Aw.-se trallie in>tpticts wthin the Dona -Vistas tUbdlti isi+111 :lrisiltg Uri)m 111e pr4jiei I: h. rhe r'm I ratToc Ir iNict Anal vsj s I"telx)rt iws, a growth rat€ of I'�',. in cuntr 4t to the 11,;, trn'4+,-th rete L! m p I ov cd by the 70 [ 8 Wiich0L I;W-ilWcri11 '1 rrt1111c 1111P;3cI At aIv,,is RcIvn. "FraffiG tong .stion is vm tsem;itiv w ori -A-1 h ratc Ina non -liner. r> 1aLi%1n-. [Ik SSFM [Mat is 1mj,.uL1 Anid)'tiis Itclu>'rt dcrc:, 111A rtL-LkkF1tir.r MILICi-P(MCF4101kil bu$ilt� c1rHac:1eJStiL:5 ctarnmO.t in fILL •aii EILC Lmling to censiui data and Iii -e1% uncitrtslimates dallIN vchieIc Irips aIInhtrtahIC 11) hullclDLr1 0r'III d f1,Y111OSed k')MjeCI'. d. IItc S'�TK1 I R11'61 IIt1PLICI r' nalisIs Rcport cnTploNr :ill LJIItISIL-A ll1• 10% VChItle: wkil U111C Of 8a ; VVkli.t„Cw!S IOr l 'tsrchh,11.101I Q01I.arl Ka4hlu1IWU 11IgilAaV ON OW IVOIt:cC+ d ✓. Jh:S til pri1 ;+la, U I4), a v4cc wb.v and A u11 •I .,� ,`I1] t1. a sm,urda�. c;ulf1rart:t.I ww•iOt the 2(11 N Witchct 111,,.,int-erirlg IraltkL fltlj lIiA Iexp.med 11)'§7 vt•hivles N)rtiniivr% la and 15. 2t11#1, I314lt'~+ocki i—,, I11+.• I-llltl4miII4 It: rgVriek] Lchic Iv b•ollllix o1 953 1- la1%tr ;rl mIb I`l-gure 4 tII IIle SSI -M C Iafi-r Irnt>',lc l Amil ,is idupikri. awIiI0I SJ1U%V9.I[11-IT X1.r1llttcl}' Il►'+I wC I Ilk; IVw per both W 201(1 for Northbound Quvert Minhu11iam I[ighw a� % at 7 u,m 'llic diltercnkc in v` Iume 1 mors thimcIrmh)e thu rn.mNimum IIl""ti.vnriaricrkgcrwrally occi:p1cd tn.iAY- rxr-dd, IAeatiLLrt~L11C11LS wid iIiu.q 11riiviial-Ic; e 'I Ile recoiltim- ndatlion by SSFM Tral&! lrn� l ='lrI{tl}sig Report for a nlaulc4ibuttt 11 Ql.i cn Ftaall urnatnu I IThwvay and Ilualalai 14 m (Nor'th) is 1nt�dmsincnt with the traf-Iic ct►r*ijor. Imaic Iictis shut pas, %Amy ws but re=in um- ,iI..I'i ti,l Tmr .,wnr IrhPYia: Neifct% Iiahilit% tJril'11rbc 16r the gol'Ornment, t'- the re -commendation hww till %J l'r:t -rii Inv °c i %1 1, ;-•,ri I -r rnnnitcmnt11' the intcrsccrtiart c1E'Qtie1`-11 [w,.a:111wnami Higfiwaw and Ku::eki,l I I _IrStti i i.:, 1_.t..t_Itti. '"A it. 4 Iamn III inrer;e{tion P,,4ssc;s mora tl'un one u;tr1'mi under :SII condilivn!,. it-.4muld Ix, priOl-MMI ror Study Ofid Jcsi�n {it a si�tatal lilt t nsta latIVIL 1 ka« � irum-ustdatare will he tki1L'4:rbjIC J by the pnIP0,;ed prosect. '. In -urra_ 1lae I)FAI E:avirormertal Aws �rnernt and N'SFM Traffic Impact .rinubsis RCFK)rt docs rol !-�rt;sernt sirtylcivltt_ crudibic pacts alld itludl sis such ihat the adversv isrtir i1i on exiSdUg infT4StJ­ULtUIV aid wultinLi from inm-,41sed eaff,� 4aii be C'tAIN t, iticr.*toW a31id rvs.,vh in appropriate gova61a1 tori l}iiitining and respcinge C tlet.'lare under peiwlt► c7ftrv. ur- :hat the fore! ing m Ink Dated: Kr dwi-Kona. ICk-wh r 7, ?1>21), Sig n at u re., I�I't1]L�r� rz�t�a•s�° I?i:a�a� L�lrust�tt-�E:��ci���k September 1.3, 2021 S,tantec ConsulFing Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 96721 Tek {8081 494.2039 ms: D ane alancett-lv cidclock Via email: dbmkona,� aol.com RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Draft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Deoi Ms. Blancett-Maddock: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 8, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA} for the proposed project. Blease find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Draft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific cornments for traffic Impacts are discussed below. Comment -2., In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies or) the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight dl5ionces due tri extreme curves and is narrow with no sldev olks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koahumanu Highway. I cm particularly concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Plcice. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2. Kekuano'aa place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the some specilicatiors as all other Kona Vistas reads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impcct on Kekuana`oo Place frorn Royal Vistas Phase I as designed as the connection of KekuanWoci Plane to Royal Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuano'oa Place during the AM Peak period, and 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is roughly one additional vehicle on Kekuana'oo Place every 4 minutes for the peak periods, which would not cause congestion. Q� September 13, 2+021 Ms, Diane Rlancett-Maddock P cue 2 of A .Comment -3 This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increasing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or Time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7, i of the EA. Rogcirding potenfial traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oo dace is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, for the A -M and FM peak hours, respecfivel �. The traffic oralysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Comment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Hove a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicanf claims, „The Proposed Project would not affect public health in any way; stormwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been token into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added, This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chopter 11,201.1-13, Hawaii Administro five Rules. Response 4. The EA describes potential impacts under re5pective resource sections as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in hurt 5: Findings and 'reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed above in the body of the EA. QgMmgM : The Planning Deportment should non accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kana Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%. in contrast to the 29, growth rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a nein-linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Flan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to came up with the 1% growth rate. Alfhough we are not certain how Witcher Engineering got tin, our traffic engineers usec 1 T_ the 2025.LRTP forecast. Q� September 13, 2+021 Ms, Diane Rlarcett-Maddock PaQe. 3 CA Commenf 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response_l._. It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The lnstitr to of Transportafion Englialeers jITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and law -rise cnd mid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This land use hcs ca very law standard deviation and on R- squared value very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best }projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8. The TIAR employs an unusually law vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kacahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repot 1, which reported 1057 vehicles far ,January 14 sand 15, 2016, tooth weekdays. The unusually low reported vehicle volume of 853 is also of odds with figure 4 of the TIAR, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 201$ for l lorthbound Queen Kaohumanu Highwny at 7 a.m. The difference in volume is more than double the maximurn 1017o variation generally accepted in day -today measurements and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDDT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Kaahumanu Highway section between Mani K ailua Load and Hualolai Road (north}. Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to t�)e 2016 HDQT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard to say if Eire Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or if the project's TIAR is unrl oir,[Ing, but the TIAR for the project does use numbers similar to those f r,_)v7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comrnenit 9: The recommendation by the TIAR for a roundabout at Queer Kaahurmanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North; is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but remain uns[gnalized present traffic safety liability concerns far the government. The recornmendation by the TIAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Kaahumarnu Highway and l uakini Highway is inadequate. Where, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prioritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project Response 9: The Manual can Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCDj states, ,The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other considerations that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility„ and others, The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention when: Q� September 13, 2+021 Ms, Diane Rlancett-Maddock Page. 4 of d an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project_ The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please ccnioct me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mich le.lefebvre stantec.corr cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Maija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashley From: Pero Steffenhagen cpesteffe@gmail.com� Sent: Friday, October 09. 2020 833 AM To: Planning Interrwt Mail Subject: Fwd: Declaration RE Royal Vistas }attachments: Sean 27.pdt I mistakenly sent my declaration only to the per -son supporting our responses from Pualani Estates. Please accept my apologies and my declaration submission this morning. Thank you! Peri .. !, 'w, .1: ,i . I _.u.,. I ITk4two 1, ,t , ---- Forwardccl mvssu c From: Peri Sk Menhugen <VnAeITOI-6nail xu171> D atc; Thu, OL -t 8, 2030 at 5;01 I'M Subject: Declaratinn RE Royal ViSILI ; I'n- l). Blanc ett-maddt► 11�a ik ca r�t��k1_ aaitt-� PC -to I Ifioslirrl 1 p . r", : I riif.ih ih; 4(W '4- 124B 1.116966 I. I tw a residiril oil Pualani F- ACS subdivision]. i,'crurtt?, cit l S tAk 01' lawwdai-i. The pror%ised .kaiid de-,c°larpra-it:nI pFvjacl that. is dw sul iaci of the pcndine Draft Envrronmeotal A�:se-ssiaent submitted hU ROE JI Vies TFOIISill g prcrjCO Tax flap Edey N wi- f31 7-6-it'2'1 :t116� 7 -Fr - 02 1 r 021 #° 0. 7-[r-ir 1:018, ,ind ?-6-021 A,4 Norrh Kona I3astnct, Ila w•ai`i Islaaicl. State M- Hawail uffQcts Inc persormily LL; ►aell as iffec:ts 111V inlereA in rk�a.l properly- I residc,-within IW Yards [dimance] of the proposed [calci a3cveloptt aw prn,ject In stwh capacilies. 1 l .ive firsthand knov� ledge nAhc: Italltawin' liacty valid Could arid wwt ldd t4.slify lbercto it`vallk�d [Ifl,111 141 L11 s;Y. hiivv reviowed ffit pend -My, L?RAF i E:'�VlR{ NNII-NI'Al. ASSE:SSMl:l I including the 'l'ni iL Impnet Analysis Report by tiSFM Inteniallonlit; dated July ?020 aid niva,fli T 3s Ar�p ndix 2 to the DIS_' A ENviRoN1a1i"-N-I-.AI.:A9,'-,',FS1S%1:N 1. 1 ark sywctilically concerned aN)13l a::l.V-Mt• tr`aftic itUpacls bcnh within and .Othouz the Kona Vistas suhdivisican [hall arc: TFtwt fully Or dICCILzs•at0: 1 in thti 5tiFNI U&I'fic Impact Analy5is Repwirt Tratfii: :ctrl the SSFM °l naffic Iripacr Analysis RLpmi :arc &scuswcd in the lyMv of the C P2�FT EN'w'TRi NMF-- ~~-l't1,L .,LSSESSNEF,N-C. a1 pp, 48--5v(a. ti i arta 71. 3 In the Kona Vistas suhdivision. the proposed prtsjcer reheas cin fe- use o-1"ta substandard roadwEiv. kekuuna-oa FILwc. ICe;ltic=u°on Plaer -is vQry zft up, I ws 11mited sig[it distances, dtrc to extrume curves and is nan-ow *s%Ah no ,1dewg1ks, "The impact of increased traffic - • t - :i 'dtase I unci lllha a 2 birikk1uls cWthe RoyRl VTgal. 1-1011'W111 I'M -1W k 1?1JLlCctur1Lel� a i ,�,e SSFm-fraffic impact r'1nahsis Report. %,�hlch fi:icuses in --stead {fit isil eL alon {i,,€rWti ! &u pa'tiCLAarly eancerrwed that adding faimerow. vehicic tripw 1%) --nd i'rtim a separate suhdivisicm will present danger% and congestion tu) residents alung E;ei umia`ca Ftmx. I ctuisi&r [hat tla: I'1UUL'rr,� f CPdr4utcirl Should rcgW,re the applic.ant to atkln ss tliesc r. me ru . 4 I ho DRAFT FMlRl�NM NTAL ASSESSMENT reyuims VV3111:160r1 Of. among OtheTh. impafc'ts, .Flee' ct. f1411 Piit hnn f hn)l Kes or c,Ijm,ts on ppohlie fiu,iWies. time Chapter I 1-''00-1-1 , llawaMii Adntinistrativ Rults. tnstrr&f cit-squa cly :tci+.lr sing tlacsc issues, lit.)wcN,cr, the t)ktA IA I -. N V I RC )N M 11.N I'A1, AISS FSSfw ENT simply igiikrrca them, c lainil lag rhm "No 2%iverse. secondary 0-1 iw i° urc cxpu: ;tcd dnee lbe devcleiamcnt would utili7c exisling Inlrar,1Tlx1U , proviJa inliW 110USing, ilEJ 1$ rxlt expCCIC-4 to resitli in 4tihoa;mio, dettwd—S 10 CCIAnty sca-wrces," 1t is a %ull us omission tear the i)Ttr' IJ l NI VIR NMENTAL ,%S'.,)1 -.NN' 1,N I' tri tail to address the lxilcatiul Jvl ;r;w Waits L,,f incrcasing the rtsr of stiifistaTiLfi<f(l exma tin6 inl'rasrrrir:tt N, like: kekwna`oa Place, 5 Fie 1") RA1= 1 lfiN V I RON l C'N I AL AS S ESSMFNT add sses ad verse traMic impacts only in the cuill text cit` w4clher the prujeet tiaoc d Have a sub:s►ernlieli adiFeme etk-r l i rn puhhc• hued1h. 11c AVpliL;-4nt claims. " ht: Proposcd P7-ijea:t would not affect public hc-Wih in 11fly way, slcrnimater would he appror ialelw' tli paved cwt' in drainage I`rat)ic impacts have lee -ii alcen i wt to tia� eiul censidera it i- pr j_et t desi n_" Emphasis a i#dui_l. This valet c-nnclusiran dans notaddress patendal adverse Impacts as required by(- harLur l f la 4;cii Actudiuisttatiti•e fades. 2 h. I he 1.1faiattiug i s-partmvnt should not ,lcixpi the DRf I -T I NVIRONMEN-1-Al. ASSESS�41.`�i T's raliano on the SSF\J Traffic Impact Analysis Rulmir't_ +which hai the foliowing deficiencies. fallux -o addross ai- 4-FIL' 4i If 11ti lvilr rls within nhe K(mLl Vistas sulnlik'lsiMI arising lrom the project; l,. The S11%F ri'I rui'fic IIIJrA:t .AnaIvsis Re part asci a gruM11 rate C -of I Id. in Cirratm IL) the --l°w� growth r'Jte urttplO+ ed by the 2018 Witcher FngirLeering TraiTic Impact '4nalv%is lzclxirt. 'rra is cor eMI.on is vcav sOISitive tv growth rate in a nora-linLrar, expmrimtial relatiom c. `I lac SSFM l rrti'lic 1mpacl Antal}`sis Report 4lcrcw not rcegnhrc multi-gercrationral lkLIUS'ULg charactcristl{s uvrWItlyn in 4.laar.vati wcordirig to census daltt and J c'ly urt&l ca ,timates ci tlly vC7aac14 hila-- ;3titi}rumhle m htnlclmv of flae pro pa sed prk�j et - Pie Fratllic lr pmn AFIUIYis kerx)rt cmplmS W, tatat,9l1,0Ny ILK vehicle � ul mie of 8-5 ► vehicks fur Nurtht-kaulld 01wrt ls.mhurruma 4111ghwoy nrI tho sclucted plat%n O£ April to, 2019, ?► vac-c,kd ay and Augum 24. 2011. u Saturday. COM red Ulth the - ) R l�b`itc;itcr l nzincerin0 Fr:tt'l'ic: [inpact ?analysis ReptfrL which mp rted 11157 vehicles for JtWllary 14 JPd 15. 2016. troth weekdays. T�L, unusaLaa.11y low repurtt:d �-clii4lc volume of 833 is rflsm ui { ddi With I+it"ure 4 at the ASF M l raffic [mpact .Anal'Ytiis RCP)rt, %VI ich slaws appruxima ly 1050 i-e-hicles per hOLLr in 014' for Northbound Quccen KaLahumanu tlighw,r al +� ir.tta. T1ao cli]fcr�nc� in v oltuiae is more thein ekruhle the maximum Ifl",% Y r'1alrun generally :ai=ptcd in dav-tc-kv t7ieaSalrCM Tat; Md tl'at.ti tanrt hahle. e°_ rhe rtcurnnwndatiun by SS>rM Traffic hupac:L AILdly k Pcpom for as rouridalxwt at Qu.en Kmh,umanu High-aLy, and Huala[aiE lead (Nornh) is incums6ocrLt vvitit the traffic K. corridur. that pass w urrarits lout rmain urt_stgnalived present M.IT sof It ltahilaty concerns for this govemnicat,- f "[am rccc►m-mentation by SSPM Traitc impact Analysis Report for monitoring of the intern--�c'tion of Qu=n Kaahurmanu Highway and K[Lakini Ffigh xny is insar3egmlle Where. as lmtrc. ate irtitrr-A--cti0rr p&w,sel; Tuore than one ivarranT under all conditions_ it should be pnDritited for study and design of signal for ins Ration. This circumstance M]l be exacerbated by the PrArptastA Prrruica:t 7- I11 sun, the Draft kivi, iroimmit a] Nssossr emit astd SS FM lratltc Intpnc;t Am lysis RejMart dot's not pmwai safficient. mdible fac:tsmd analysis such that iFw u.dvc:rw m1pa;ts on cxisrirtg lnfrxitruc;turc and rr`%A ing from iix-t a: ed uml'iic can be fulls w-Kiersttuacl and result in uppropiiwc. gow minim plarming ar. d ",if++frise. I d clam rrncfer penalty of pc6ttry that the forrgv, ng, is true. Dated- Faailuu-KO71a, llUXU11'1, Octohcr # �Il?tit. r — 4--Y-7- Pnnted flame �" i Septerr'iber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec Consutling Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hilo, HI 98721 Tek {8081 494.2039 Ms. Peri Steffenhagen Via email, pesteffe;,`. tlmail.corr't RE: Comments on Traffic Concerns in the Graft Environmental Assessment and Anticipated FONSI for Royal Vistas Housing Project, Borth Kana District, Hawal'i Island Dear Ms. Steffenhagen: Thank you for the comment letter dated October 9, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment IDEA} for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Comment 1. 1 have reviewed the pending Craft Environmental Assessment including the Traffic Impact Analysis Report (TIAR) (Appendix 2 of the IAEA). I am specifically concerned about adverse traffic impacts both within and without the Kona Vistas subdivision that are not fully or accurately addressed in the TIAR. Response 1: Specific cornments for traffic Impacts are discussed below. Comment -2., In the Kona Vistas subdivision, the proposed project relies or) the use of a substandard roadway, Kekuanaoa Place. Kekuanaoa Place is very steep, has limited sight dl5ionces due to extreme curves and is narrow with no sidevwolks. The impact of increased traffic arising from Phase i and Phase 2 buildouts of the proposed project is inadequately addressed in the TIAR, which focuses instead on impacts along Queen Koahurnanu Highway. I crn porticulohy concerned that adding numerous vehicle trips to and from a separate subdivision will present dangers and congestion to residents along Kekuanaoa Place. I consider that the Planning Department should require the applicant to address these concerns. Response 2. Kekuano'ca place is a County -owned road built to County standards, with the some specilicatiors as all other Kona Vistas reads, including paved s ales as sidewalks. There will be no traffic impcct on Kekuana`oo Place from Royal Vistas Those I os designed cls the connection of KekuanWoci Place to Royal 'Vistas is not planned until Phase II in 2029. After that, once full build -out is completed, the TIAR estimates a total of 30 additional vehicles on Kekuaano'oa Place during the AM Peak period, rind 25 additional vehicles during the PM Peak period. This is rouaaily one additional vehicle on Kekuana`oo Place every 4 minutes for the peak pariods, which would not cause congestion. September 13, 2+021 Ms, Pert Steffenhagen Page. 2 of 4 .Comment-: This DEA requires evaluation of, among others, adverse secondary impacts, such as population changes or effects on public facilities. Instead of separately discussing these issues, however, the DEA ignores therm. It is a serious omission to fail to address potential adverse impacts of increosing the use of substantial existing infrastructure, like Kekuana`oa Place. Response. : Secondary effects are indirect effects, or effects that would occur at a different place or Time than the proposed project. These effects are not expected since the project is expected to provide infill housing for on -island residents ns described in Section 3.7, i of the EA. Rogcirding potenfial traffic impacts to Kekuana'oo Place, the number of vehicles projected to use Kekauna'oo Place is the Phase II outbound traffic (22 and 9, icor the A -M and P peak hours, respectfvel�. The traffic analysis includes a detailed analysis of secondary traffic effects impacts (Section 3.7.2 of the EA). Camment 4: The DEA addresses adverse traffic impacts only in the context of whether the project would Have a substantial adverse effect on public health. The Applicanf claims, „The Proposed Project world not affect public health in cony way, storrnwater would be appropriately disposed of in drainage structures. Traffic impacts have been taken into careful consideration in project design." Emphasis added. This bald conclusion does not address potential adverse impacts as required by Chapter 11.200.1-13, Hawaii Administrative Rules. Response 4: The EA describes potential impacts under respective resource sectior;s as they could impact human health. The summary statement quoted is included in hurt 5: Findings and 'Reasons, and accurately summarizes the impacts detailed and analyzed alcove in the body of the EA. QgMmgW : The Planning Department should not accept the DEA's reliance on the TIAR, which fails to address adverse traffic impacts within the Kana Vistas subdivision arising from the project. Response 5: Intersections within the Kona Vistas project were not analyzed since those internal intersections are probably stop controlled and have only local residential traffic. Delays to these intersections are not expected to be significant. Comment 6: The TIAR uses a growth rate of 1%. in controsf to the 2°l growths rate employed by the 2018 Witcher Engineering TIAR. Traffic congestion is very sensitive to growth rate in a nein-linear, exponential relation. Response 6: Hawaii Department of Transportation (HDQT) counts did not show an increase in traffic volume. Thi 2035 Federal Aid Highways Lange Range Transportation Plan forecast projections for 2020 and 2035 were used to come up with the 1% growth rate. we are not certain how Witcher Engineering gat 2, our traffic engineers uses. 1 T from the 2025 LRTP forecast. September 13, 2+021 T1s, Peri Sieffenhagen Pall' ' ;1 Comment 7; The TIAR does not recognize multi -generational housing characteristics in Hawaii according to census data and likely underestimates daily vehicle trips attributable to buildout of the proposed project. Response 1. It is hard to predict whether a 3 -bedroom house will have 10 people with two cars, or three people with four cars, or be unoccupied with no people and no cars, or if residents will use the bus. The lnstit[ to of TrcInsportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Handbook was used and law -rise cnd raid -rise was considered. Low-rise multifamily housing was used since it provided a higher volume output. This Icnd use has a very law standard deviation and on R- squared value 'very close to 1.00, so statistically this is the best }projection used by the traffic engineer. Comment 8. The TIAL employs an unusually law vehicle volume of 853 vehicles for Northbound Queen Kaahumanu highway on the selected dates of April 30, 2019, a weekday and August 24, 2019, a Saturday, compared with the 2018 Witcher Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis Repo] 1, which reported 1057 vehicles far ,January 14 and 15, 2016, Moth weekdays. The unusually low reporied vehicle volume of 853 is also at odds with Figure 4 of the TIAL, which shows approximately 1050 vehicles per hour in 201$ for Morthbound Queen Kaohumanu Highwoy of 7 a.m. The difference in volurne is more than double the maximum I No variation generally accepted in day-to-day measurements and thus unreliable, Response 8: The most recent Historic HDDT count available in the study area was the 2016 Queen Koahumanu Highway section between Nani Kailua Read and Hualalai Road (north}. Our traffic count taken in August of 2019 was compared to t�)e 2016 HDQT count and was found to be fairly comparable. It is hard tc say if lege Witcher Engineering report is overcounting, or it the project's TIAR is unrl oir,ling, but the TZAR for the project does use numbers sirr7ilar to those f r,_)v7ded in the 2016 HDQT Count. Comment 9: The recommendation by the TIAR far a roundabout at Queer Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) is inconsistent with the traffic corridor. Intersections that pass warrants but rernain unsignalized present traffic safety liability concerns far the government. The recommendation by the TZAR for monitoring of the intersection of Queen Koahurnoru Highway and Kuakini Highway is inadequate. Inhere, as here, an intersection passes more than one warrant under all conditions, it should be prcritized for study and design of a signal for installation. This circumstance will be exacerbated by the proposed project Respor2$e 9: The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ( UTCDj states, ,The satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant or warrants shall not in itself require the installation of a traffic control signal." There are other consicteratians that need to be done before installing a signal, such as the increase in delay, the likely increase in rear end accidents, geometric feasibility„ and others, The scope covered in this TIAR does not include that analysis. The TIAR does mention when: September 13, 2+021 Ms, Pe6 Steffenhagen Page 4 of 4 an intersection may warrant a signal, and that further study may be needed. It should also be mated that many of these intersections currently warrant a signal without the proposed project_ The proposed project is not necessarily triggering the satisfaction of a traffic signal warrant. We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please ccnioct me at (808) 494-2039 or by email. Sincerely, Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Michele Lefebvre, Ph.D. mich le.lefebvre stantec.corr cc: Richard Wheelock, Konya Three LLC M aija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department Mori, Ashle Frolrct: Peri 5teffenhagen epe5teffe gmailCOITI Sent Friday C?_ tuber 09,2320 836 AM To: Planning Ilztar eT M311 Subject: Fwd_ Signed Doci. mc-f7t Regarding Royal Vi5tas Attachments: Royal Vistas Document 1-pdr I mistakenly sent my declaration only to the person supporting our responses frorr Pualani Estates, Please accept my apologies and my declaration submission this morning. Thank you! - - Forwarded message --------- l- %im, Peri Steffenhagien c l)L`,�tuffL"r+l!1liail.ti°oin> Data I'hu, { $C ON. -11 i art itl 4::5(i FM v - SekbleIl: Signed DoL:umc�tf Regarding Rowl ViRta-,; To-. p_ Blrrncent-rn,adfloc 1h 111k r,� ,-lol,o1n1 Sending this one separately as I r -nay not get Lhe- rather one to you by 5 PM - 1.1696 D] "(,'[.A RA' !SOF 'P •RI'S'l 1-+FF-NHA(PL,N_ PILIAL.•' NI LSI A FS Ili'MEOW-NER_ 1. 11FR1 ST-FFFLNIIAGEN dedare: }. I am �i r�s4caerti oaf F:ailux•lCt�gt€�_. L`c�urttG of -1 l�aw:Yi'i. '�tu[4� ttT 1;Ez�tix�ti'i l'hr pr,npnseal Iarrti project that is they suhjac1 ul Lhe pending, Drift F nviro neinal A�sussnzent submitted by Rox-al 'L'istt s Housmv Frnject I ax N1 Up KeY Nvs. 13 ) I-6-0? 1:{) Ifs. 7-6-- 021:01T 7-0O21:01 M. aril •7-6-021:01Q Norih Kona Dimrid. I l %w Iki [slunk], StRie tit' ltiiW I rt1lket5 nit personlll) U WL11 tIr ate ds rtly iitCmst iri rc-.i) pfol a). 1 restdc within _1 (lfl vards _ (distrrrse �J tsf the prujxtised 1nna cJovelorment pruycct. I!1 such capo€ 6;s. I hog ,2 6rwthan€i knowledge ol'the Iiotl+,wiitg t i-Ios €incl could and woulA tt;slilN therch) ii' Cal Iod IIPon ILt rtc� -Al' reviewed the Nulling DFUNI I l -NV IItC)twll+�li`'�TAL ASL% '-S, hit-I'and ultuc.h3 gilts. t ani ., iric"5 conceruead aNxlut' Cltltura': artifacts and nnlixi� tai:mu Ftuhitul. sped Fic-ally Ihc: pt co (owls) and Nos Lht it l scu iivarls niphily front NII- I -In"] ?. I tj,)t cort,,,ider chat the lrcha colilgicul stwtjie- of er l in yupp€ a 01 115C Df Ak F oviroanicrrtal ur_ adequate. See ltp _ thcrcof. 4. 1 arra a3;xar evidenuc Gists that the land encormpasscd by the .wlthjml bind parcels inchido fr iiures 4,t'tltt Heluallo.r.t ZiLdc. incltidijtg rot_l: walls ikrai art inadequately dese-6bcd as agrtculiural Wail,, in the urchaeoingical studiem ofrcrv� in suprM of f.he, Drat Fixtvirta mental Asscssmuni- 'l"ltc 1iol t,aioo Slidii is an itnpvft=t 161a" -k culiuml �jid archacologn e,al femur: from pry-Westem contact iintL*� that ca meal be replaced if dw':39c�d Or destrovvd. I� 5, 1 Ntw rete umcerns uron the evalutat oam and analy�i5 perf urmcAl by Tern Pohaku Swire. u Copy oI- which i:, attached_ In guru, (hc DrA F,nv;reFul Ierital rl sraent.Jve—snot JiscUs tiu(frcient facts and analysis, surer tihai dv impurtwit Ilawai'tan cultural, whaeolopr:al, and native fauna features can F�e Llnd,�ml,)oLL ietalonc ptxaNrly prc: rve& At u minirnum, the 11ruh F.mir€ nmentnl Aswssartew must be reL'i.qtd ko adtllress IN IOC360n, daW FINOo C!" LMd [)aetiervail011 01'111c 11101LAIIS SOtde c[arnponen(s pre n% on the iub,jCO panels. cJ -ul:irc rtn+ t:r rwiudtv ofpc"�ury that tJt� #iyr+�&Hing is truT Oated- OxtL.2021. signalUrc; _ printed nntne Septerr'rber 1.3, 2021 S,tantec Consufling Services Inc, P.O. Boz 191 Hila, HI 98721 Tek f$QSI 494.2039 Ms. Peri Steffenhagen Via email: pesteffc",grnail.com RE: Comments on the draft Enrrlironment all Assessment and Anticipated FONSf for Royal Vistas Housing Project, North Kana District, Hawal'i Island Dear Ms. Stettenhcgen: shank you for the comment letter dated October 9, 2020, on the Draft Environmental Assessment JDEA) for the proposed project. Please find responses below to your substantive comments. Cornmenf 1: 1 have reviewed the pendirng Draft Environmental Assessment and attachments. I am specifically concerned about cultural artifacts and native fauna Specs; idly t+ oueo (avis) and bats that I see nearly rightly from my lanai. Respan...se i- The EA discusses cultural resources including haw impacts to cultural resources would be minimized in Sections 3.5 and 3.6. The presence and potential habitat for biological species are included in the existing conditions part of Section 3.3.4, and potential impacts to habitat for native species including protection measures to minimize these impacts are discussed in the impacts part of Section 3.3.4. Any awls observed at night are not pueo, but are non-native barn owls which prey on native species including Newell's shearwoters, Hawaiian stilts, Buiwer's petrels, brown noddies, Hawaiian ducks. and none goslings. Comment 2: 1 do not consider that the archaeological studies in support of the IAEA are adequate. I am aware that substantial evidence exists that the land encamp❑ssed by the subject parcels includes features of the Holualoca Slide, including rock walls that are inadequately described as agricultural wails in the archaeological studies offered in support of the DEA. The Holualoa Slide is cr7 important Hawaiian cultural and archaeological feature from pre -Western contact times that cannot be replaced if damaged or destroyed. Response 2: As described in Section 3.6 and included in. Appendix 5 of the EA, two Archaeological Inventory Surveys (AISsj were prepared for the project. As part of rhe AIS, sites in the project area were documented and evaluated for their significance. The AISs were conducted following Ha'vvaii Administrative Rules § 13-276 and were evaluated according to the process required by 13-284-6. All 40 sites were considered significant under criterion d because of the information that was Learned during the study. Documentation of these sites as part of the September 13, 2021 Ms, Pe6 Steffen hogen Page. 2 of 3 AISs ensures that their information is not lost. The documentation done was adequate to mitigate the project's effects to the sites. Regarding the rack walls within the project site, there is a historic era road (Site 24211) documented. This road is not very straight, has obtuse angle turns, the ground surface is not smooth, as would be expected if the site were the remains of a holua. Also, the walls were 1.0 meter in haefght and is similar in constructed to similar historic era rack walls constructed along historic -era roads, property boundaries, gardens. and cattle pastures, The only other parallel walls within the project site are Site 31182, Features 2 and 3, walls located in the northern and northeastem portions of the project site. These two wraps are located along the boundary of a Land Commission award (LCA) #3660. Addltionolly, the western end of Feature 3 ends in a gulch and there is a gap in the Feature 2 wall at the some gulch, It is unlikely that this is a hblua course since the parallel walls empty into a large gulch. Therefore, there is no evidence of a h6lua in the project site. Comment 3: 1 base my concerns upon the evaluation performed by Tam Pohaku Stone, a copy of which is attached. The DEA does not discuss sufficient facts and analysis such that the irnportont Ho alion cultural and orchcaeologicol features can be understood let alone properly preseNed. The DEA must be revised to address the location, data recovery and preservation of the Halualoo Slide components present on the subject parcels. Response S: In the email provided, #here is reference to "the portion of the holua at Phe Holuca inn [that] has rack walls an both sides" and refers to parallelwalls within the proposed development area, possibly Site 31182 Feature 2 and Feature 3 walls which are LCA #3660 boundary walls. Primarily, Mr, Stone's email responses provide accurate information concerning the cultural importance of the royal and religious complexes along the coast and within the near -coastal region between Kailua to the north and Keauhou to the south. The remains of many of these complexes were first mapped by Henry Kekahuna. Mr. Stone correctly states the religious and social importance of he'eholuo and itsconnection to the sacred and sociopolitical structures along the coast and in the near coastal region. However, the complexes are located more than 1.0 km wrest of the project area and there are no remains of royal, sacred or sociopolitical complexes, or ca holua, within the project area. The existence of a holy a within the project area is not asserted by Mr. Stone. As discussed above, there is no documented oral history, archival documentation, or orchoeologiccal evidence to suggest a hbluca course existed within the project area. Q)� September 13, 2021 T1s, Peri Sieffenhagen Page. 3 of 3 We sincerely appreciate your review of the document. If you have any additional comments or questions about the EA, please contact me at (808) 494-2039 or by ernall. Sincerely, Sfanfec Consulting Services Inc. Michele 'Lefebvre, Ph.D. michele.lefebvre@stantec.com cc: Richard Wheelock, Kona Three LLC Mcaija Jackson, County of Hawaii Planning Department APPENDIX 2: Traffic Impact Assessment Report Royal Vistas SSFM International FI NAL Royal Vistas Tax Map Key (3) 7-6-021. 016, 17 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Kona, Island of Hawaii May 2020 Prepared for Kona Three LLC, Prepared by Royal Vistas SSFM Internartional Table of Contents I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..........................................................................................................................1 II. EXISTING CONDITIONS........ __ ....... __._ ...... ............ ........ ..... __4 A. Geometric Configuration . ............ ................................. ......... ...... .... ......... .............. ..............,.... .,......4 1. Roadway Configuration..............................................................................,..................................4 2. Study Inter5ections.......................................................................................................................4 3. Pedestrian Facilitles............................................,,..,,........,,...,......:.,...,,............,,............,,..,,........7 4. Bike Facilities ... ................. .............. .............................................. .............. ............... .................... 7 5. Bus Stops and Bus Routes...........................................................................,..._..............................7 B. Volumes............................................................................................................................................ 7 1. Vehicular Volume..... ... ...... ___ ........ ....... _._ ........ ..... ___—.7 2. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes...................................................................................................9 C, Traffic Clpera tlon Analysis................................................................................................................11 1. Level of Service Methodology...................................................... ............... ................................ 11 2. Existing 2019 Intersection LOS....................................................................................................12 3: Existing 2019 Traffic Signal Warrant,_____ ...... ...... __ ............ - ............ ___ 13 Ili. Near -Term (2024) — Completion of Phase 1.......................................................................................17 A. Surrounding Areas .............. ............................ .... v .......................... .......................................... .... ..17 8, Volumes..................................................................,,........................................... ......19 1. Futoi re 2024 Without Project Volumes.— ...:.................:..............:..........:........................19 2. Project Related Volumes.... ... ...... ........ ....... ___ ........ ... .19 3. Trip Distribution..........................................................................................................................19 4. Future 2024 With Project Vol un,es...................... .......... ................... ........ .....__............... ........... . 21 C. Future 2024.Intersection Traffic Operatlon Analysls...... .......... ......... ............. ............... ............ ..,..25 1. Future 2024 Without Project Intersection LOS...... ............. __ ... ...... ....... ...... —, . 2 5 2. Future 20124 With Project Intersection LOS................................................................................ 27 3. 2024.Traffic Signal Warrant........................................................................................................ 30 4. 2024 With P roj act Segm e n t LC)S.......................... ........................................................................ 31 IV. Mid -Term (2029) — Completion of Phase 2.........................................................................................32 A. 5urraunding Area Conditions...........................................................................................................32 B. Volumes..........................................................................................................................................32 1. f=uture 2329 Without Project Volumes............... ..................... ................... ...................... ..... .....32 Royal Vistas SSFM In memational Z. Project Related Volumes ,,,,,,~,,''._,,._~_,',,,_',,.,,,___,.,_.__.,.,............ ,~',84 3. Trip Di5tri6utkzn..-............. ........... ___ ......... .... ........ ....^...........^........'.......... -34 4, Fvture2029With Project Vmmnnes........ ........................ .... .............................. .............. ........ 34 C. Future ZQ29Intersection Traffic Operation Analysis ..... —............ ............. —.................. ......... 3W 1. Future 2029Without Project Intersection 'LOS ............... ........................................................... 39 Z. Future 2029 With Project|ntersedctipn LOS ... ...................... ........ ............ ............ ................. 41 3. 2029 Traffic Signal VVarrant..................................... ............. _......... ............................ ........ 44 4. 20J9With Project Segment LOS ... —........................................ .................................................. 45 V. Long -Term /203Q\— ....... —....... -----.—......... ......................................................................... 46 A. Surrounding Area Conditions ................. .......... ....................... ...................... ......... ............ 46 13, Vm|umnes............... ....................... ............ ......... ...... ......... .............. ...... ............ ....................... 4G 1. Future 2839Without Project Volumes ............................... ..................................... ................. 46 2� PrejectRelated Volumes ............................................................................................................. 46 3. Fmture ZQ3gWith Project Vol umeo....... ............. .............. ............ ............ ........ ............ 46 [ Future 203gIntersection Tr f6cOpemtionAma|NUs.....'_.....^.,._,....—.......'~,—....4g I. Future J03gWithout Project Intersection LOS .........~.........................,........49 2. Future 2039With Project Intersection LOS .... —..................... ......... --...... ............. —..... 51 1 2039 Traffic Signal Warrant ..................................................... .................................................. 54 4. 2O3QWith Project Si�gmpntLOS --- .......... --.~—....... --.--.--..~_.--...~---.-SS Vi SUMMARY AND RE[OMMENDAT|ONS—...... ..... ..~....... ....-.......... ....... ....... ...... -........... ..S6 VN. REFERENCES ............. —.............. ... ......... ......... ............ ...................... ..................... ............. 5W List ofNeumes Figure 1: Project Location Map ............................. ......................... ............... ............................................ 3 Figure2.Conceptual Site Plan .... ........................................................................ .................. .................. 3 Figure 3.�Existing 2019Lane Configuration --_---_---_----........ ............. --'_--__6 Figure4 �Queen Kamhu,nmnu Hwy /Nmn|Kmi|umDrtmHum|m|miK6L24-HmurVol umeDistribution (2015)-8 Figuma5: Exbtirig2019Peak Hour Volumes .............................. .......... ............. ....................................... 10 Figure 6' Kona [oTrrnunkyDevelopment P|aM............. ..^...... .._..............~.... ____ ..... ....ID Figure 7: Future ZO24Without Project Peak Hour Volumes --............................... ................................ 2U Figure 8: EnpectzJ Futuna Lane Configuration, ........ ............ ....... .~....... ...-............. ...... ...... ....... .22 FigureS�Phase IPniectRelated Trips ...................................................................................................... J3 Figure %OtFuture J024With Project Peak Hour Volumes ............ ............ .................. ............................ J4 Figure 11:Future 2029Without Project Peak Hour Vo]urnes..... —....... ....... ............. --... ......... 33 Figure 12:Future Lane Configuration for Phase 2 ........ ......... ....... .................. ............ ................... —3G Royal Vistas SSFM Internartionaf Figure 13: Phase 2 Inbound Project Related Trips....,,.,..............................................................................36 Figure 14: Phase 2 outbound Project Related Trips...................................................................................37 Figure 15: Future 2029 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes....................................................................38 Figure 16: Future 2039 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes....................................................................47 Figure 17: Future 2039 With Project Peak Hour Volumes...... ... .......... ......... ..... _ 48 List of Tables Table 1: Roadway Traffic Volumes ................ ............... ................................................................................. 7 Table 2: 2019 Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes,-____ ............. ......9 Table 3: LOS Criteria for Unsignalized Intersections...................................................................................11 Table 4: LOS Criteria fur5ignalized Intersections.......................................................................................12 Table 5: Existing 2019 Intersection Level of Service...............:................:..............:...................................14 cable 6: Existing 2019 Intersection Level of Service jcontinued}...............................................................15 Table 7: Four -Hour Warrant based on 2015 traffic volumes...............:.................................,....................16 I -able 8: Peak -Hour Warrant based on 2019 traffic volumes.....................................................................16 Table 9: Estimated Trips Generated - Phase I ....... ..... .....,............ ....................... .......... ,........ .............. ,..... 19 Table 10: 2019 Volumes on Queen Kaahuman u Highway between Puapuaanui St and Kuakini Highway 21 Table 11: 2019 Outbound volumes at Puapuaanul Street ... ............... ......... ..................................... .......... 21 Table 12: Future 2024 Wit' -out Project Intersection Level of Service— ............... ............. .............. _. 2 6 Table 13: Future 2024 Project Intersection Level of Service (continued).....................................27" Table 14: Future 2024 With Project Intersection Level of Service ........... ................. ................................ 29 Table 15: Future 2024 With Project Intersection Level of Service (continued) ... ..................,......... ...,....... 30 Table 16: 2024 Peak -Hour Warrant .. ....... .............. ............................................. ,,.... ........ .,........ ...... .......... 31 Table 17: 2024 with Project Segment LOS. ........................................ ................. ........................ ........ 31 Table 18: Estimated Trips Generated by Project— Phase 2.. .... ....... ....... 3 4 Table 19. Future 2029 Without Project Intersection Level of Service_.. ...... ___ ... ____ .............. ____40 Table 20: Future 2029 Without Project Intersection Level of Service (continued) .... ......... ................41 Table 21: Future 2029 With Project Intersection Level of Service............................,................................43 Table 22: Future 2029 With Project Intersection Level of Service (continued) .................... ...,..... .......44 Table 23: 2029 Peak -Hour Warrant.. ........ ... _ ...... ....... ........ ........ ........ ... ___ ... ....... _ ... ... .45 Table 24: 2029 with Pr€aject Segment LOS............................................................:.....................................45 Table 25: Future 2039 Without Project Intersection Level of Service........................................................50 Table 26: Future 2039 Without Project Intersection Level of Service (continued)....................................51 Table 27: Future 2039 With Project Intersection Level of Service.............................................................53 Table 28: Future 2039 With Project Intersection Level of Service (continued)..........................................54 Table 29. 2039 Peak -Hour Warrant ............................................................................................................55 Table 30: 2019 with Project Segment LOS ......... ............. ............................ ................................. ............. ._55 iv Royal Vistas List of Appendices Appendix A - 24 -Hoar and Peak Period Traffic Counts Appendix B - Bus Route Schedule and Map Appendjx C -Analysis Reports Existing l2019) Conditions Appendix Q --Analysis Reports Future (2024) Without Project Conditions Appendix E - Artalysis Reports Future (2024) With Project Condition5 Appendix F -Analysis Reports Future (2029) Without Project Conditions Appendix G - Analysis Reports Future (2029) With Project Conditions Appendix H - Analysis Reports Future (2039) Without Project Conditions Appendix I - Analysis Reports Future (2M) With ProjectConditions Appendix 1 - Traffic Signal Warrant - Peak Hour and 4 -hour Warrants SSFM Inremati'onal Royal Vistas SSFM Inremational I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Kona Three LLC is planning to develop a (Multi -family residential subdivision named Royal Vistas in Kona, on the Island of Hawaii. The property is located on the mauka side of the Queen Kaahumanu Highway at TIVIK (3) 7-6-021:016, 17 between Kona Vista Subdivision and Pualani Estates Subdivision. Only one roadway is planned to provide access for Phase I of the property. This roadway intersects with Queen Kanhumanu Highway, approximately 600 feet north of the intersectlon with Kuakini Highway. For this traffic impact analysis report (TIAR), this access is referred to as "Royal Vistas Roadway". The project location, along with the study intersections associated with this TIAR, are shown in Figure 1. The proposed site is 70 -acres and zoned "RIVI-5". Even though the new development's total buildout is estimated as 450 units, only 258 units are planned as Phase 1. Phase 1 is expected to he completed by 2024. Phase 2 will include the full buildout of the remaining 192 units. Phase 2 is expected to be completed by 2029_ The Royal Vistas proposed conceptual site plan is shown in Figure 2. The intent of this TIAR is to evaluate existing conditions and assess Impacts in the surrounding areas as a result of the proposed development. 5 -year ('Phase 1 ccmpletion) in 2024, 10 -year (Phase 2 completion) In 2029, and 20 -year future scenarios in 2039 will be analyzed_ Future years will be evaluated with and without the Royal Vistas project. 1 �N Y S _w f' �k w i loa Hot Pakni Ind Ruolndnf Sr fSoeeth) PuapumnEdst ` Y" KUakfniHWY 4 � LV**St �11rP7xR r "XamOoomohotli,Rd dh Y p � tW r � . 'Sl' Rawl WSW $5FMJntMxrddwI figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan Royal Vistas II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Geometric Configuration 1. Roadway Configuration SSFM international a) Queen Kaohurnaf?v Highway Where it intersects with Royal Vistas Roadway, Queen Kaahumanu Highway (Route 19) is undivided, two- lane, State -awned arterial, oriented i Royal Vistas SSFM Inremartional 4. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) a. Clueen Kaahurnanu Highway is oriented in a narth-south direction and Hualalai Road is oriented in an east -west direction, b. Three -leg, STOP sign controlled intersection with dedicated left turning lanes for the southbound and westbound approaches. c. Channelized right turn lanes exist for the northbound and wwesthound approaches. d. A refuge lane is provided far the westbound left turns canto Queers Kaahumanu Highway. 5, Queen Kaahumanu Highway and: Puapuaanui Street a. Queen Kaahumanu Highway is oriented In a north -south direction and Puapuaanui Street is oriented in an east -west direction b. Three -leg, signalized intersection with dedicated left turning lanes for the southbound and westbound approaches.. c. The southbound left turn is protected. d. Channelized right turn lanes provided for the northbound and westbound approaches. 6. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway a. Queen Kaahumanu Highway is oriented in a north -south direction and Kuakini Highway is oriented in an east -west direction. b. Three -leg, STOP sign controlled intersection with dedicated left turning lanes for northbound and eastbound. c, Channelized right turn lanes exist for the eastbound and sauthbound approaches_ d. A refuge lane is provided for the eastbound left turns onto Queers Kaahumanu Highway. e. Kuakini Highway is a state-owned facility. 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Lako Street a.. Queen Kaahumanu Highway is oriented in a north -south direction and Lako Street is oriented in an east -west direction. b. Four -leg, slgnalized intersection with dedicated Deft turning lanes for each approach. c. Left turns from Queen Kaahumanu Highway onto Lako Street are protected -permitted. This is the only intersection in the project area on Queen Kaahumanu Highway that uses protected -permitted phasing. The Laka Street phases are split. d, Channelized right turn lanes exist for each approach. S. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Karnehameha III Road a. Queen Kaahumanu Highway is oriented in a north south direction and Karnehameha III Road is oriented in an east -West direction. b. Fokir-leg, signalized intersection with dedicated left turn lanes exist an northbound, and southhound approaches. c. Left turns from Queen Kaahumanu Highway are protected. The Kamehameha III Road phases are split. d. Channelized right turn lane exists forsouthbound and eastbound approach. Existing {2010 lane configurations and traffic controls at the study intersections are shown in Figure 3. Royal Vistas SSFM International Palani Rd Henry St z +�-- North �fIIII Ilfirr + T T IIIII Illi+ ` T � �,me . Palani Rd Henry St Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Queen Kaahumanu Hwy -- t u u } u � L L .— E S E =T 111.. r E SC �C Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Queen Kaahumanu Hwy LeMenr CSigpalized Unsignalized :. Stop Sign Illlllfllll Crosswalk Intersection `•-.� intersection Figure 3: Existing 2029 Lane Configuration 0 Royal Vistas SSFM Inremational 3. pedestrian Facilities Sidewalks are provided on each corner of Palani Road and Henry Street. A sidewalk is provided on the mutts side of Queen Kaahumanu Highway between Palani Road and Henry Street, Sidewalks are provided on both sides of Puapuaanui Street and stopjust before the intersection with Queen Kashurnanu Highway. The crosswalks provided at each intersection are shown in Figure 3. 4. Bike Facilities Marked bike lanes are provided on Queen Kaahumanu Highway at Henry Street and extend north. There are no marked bike lanes south of this intersection. There are bike lanes on Lako Street east of Queen Kaahumanu Highway to Huaialai Road. Based on the State Route System, marked shoulders along Queen Kaahumanu Highway in the study area range from 5 feet to 10 feet. 5. Bus Stops and Bus Routes The County of Hawaii's transit system (Hele-on Bus) doesn't have bus routes that travel along Queen Kaahumanu Highway near the study area. The closest bus stops to the proposed facility are located at. Kana Commom Shopping Center, more than 3 miles away, The Intra Kona bus route serves this stop and operates between 5=55 AM to 8:30 PM, Monday to Saturday. Appendix 8 includes the detailed bus route schedule and map for this route. B. Volumes 1. Vehicular Volume a) Roadway Traffic volumes Historical average daily traffic (ADT) and peak hour volumes along Queen Kaahumanu Highway in the study area are shown in. Table 1. The ADT is based on Hawaii DOT traffic counts included in Historical Traffic Station Maps, Table 1. Roadwvay Traffic Volumes Roadway Location ADT Year Queen 25'800 2016 Between Nani Kailua Drive and Hualalai 5 9id0 2015 Kaahumanu Road. Highwb;y Source: Historical Traffic Station Maps (HDOT) The 24-hour traffic volume distribution along Queen Kaahumanu Highway {see f=igure 4) at the traffic count station shows a variation `rn travel patterns throughout the day with prominent morning and afternoon commuter peak periods. Detailed 24-hour counts are included in Appendix A. Along Queen Kaahumanu Highway, during the morning peak hour of 7:00 - 8:00 AM, there were approximately 1,083 vehicles par hour (vph) travelling northbound and 755 vph travelling southbound for a total of 1,848 vph. Luring the afternoon peak hour of 3;45 — 4;45 PM, there were approximately 914 vph travelling northbound and 1,017 travelling southbound for a total of 1,031 vph. 7 Rel Vfstas 2 S 8 2 2 % R $ » Vo lu _ hd_ psrnut) SSFmmrem&l Figur Queens AumanuHwy (Na mK a i ba Dr t0Humalai Rd),24-Hou r Volume mstM bution( l 2 Royal Vistas SSFM inremational lrf Existing 2019 Intersection Peak Hour Volumes Manual intersection turning movement traffic counts were taken at the eight study intersections: 1) Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Palani Road, 2) (ween Kaahumanu Highway and Henry Street, 3) Queer Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (north), 4) Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (south), 5) Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street, 5) Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway, 7) Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Lako Street, and 8) Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Karneharneha III Road. Counts were collected during the peak periods on Tuesday, April 30, 2019 and Thursdayr ,August 24, 2019. Counts included tabulation of passenger vehicles, heavy trucks, pedestrians, and bicycles. The Existing (2019) peak hour volumes are shown in Figure 5. Detailed peak period counts are included in Appendix A, Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes 2. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes Queen Kaahurnanu Highway is a frequently used training route for Ironman and therefore has regular bicycle activity. Table 2 shows the 2019 pedestrian and bicycle volumes. Most of the observed pedestrian activity occurred at Henry Street. Bicycle counts were higher in the AM peak hour than the PM peak hour. Table 2: 2019 Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes Study Intersection AM PM Ped Bike PedBike Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Palani Rd 1 3 4 3 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Henry St 9 4 12 4 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hoalalal Rd (N) Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai Rd (S) 03 0 1 0 4 0 0 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Puapuaanui St 0 2 1 0 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kuakini Hwy 0 2 0 0 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Lako St 1 2 1 0 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kameharneha III Rd 1 10 0 2 19 Royal Vistas ON �-• r ,1 1200 A57 {877} Tr 2-18 (503j z g Palani Rd �J t6 " lz�Vzi Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy U 44 (10) �. r 4.8 (70) LPI '-f J M f1 09 1� 1401 71 40171 9(14) Ih ❑ 4 _P 185 (107) 87'(34} T co Queen Kaahurnt nu Hwy ro 2 SSFM International Henry Sc 467 (314) — 6w (5a) 107 1190 _� .� T d 359 9663; 124 1291) HenrySt Queen KaahUFlIanu Hwy WD r� L I 3 169 (37Z) Q F, M ,-4 00 -4 M PSI 23 (41) -- 678 ( 609) 251 (127) " 163 (22.3) �-• r ,1 1200 A57 {877} Tr 2-18 (503j z g Palani Rd �J t6 " lz�Vzi Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy U 44 (10) �. r 4.8 (70) LPI '-f J M f1 09 1� 1401 71 40171 9(14) Ih ❑ 4 _P 185 (107) 87'(34} T co Queen Kaahurnt nu Hwy ro 2 SSFM International Henry Sc 467 (314) — 6w (5a) 107 1190 _� .� T d 359 9663; 124 1291) HenrySt Queen KaahUFlIanu Hwy WD r� L I 3 169 (37Z) Legend Peak Hrsur Vclurnes it SIM (PM) 5ignalixed 1veh/hrl '`✓ Intersedion '4) L.n L+ r4 tJ 267 (193) ♦ r^ 36139} ,L 691 Fit} 4) W oto ti 15 118) +) fi L Queen Kaahumanu Hwy I North @ Unsignaiized Stop 51gr, Intersection Figure 5: Existing 2019 Peale Hour Volumes 10 Q F, M ,-4 00 -4 M PSI 251 (127) 4.8(401 69 (48} CC L E f 1.57 (290)—, 5 (11 ) --- 26 1521 Legend Peak Hrsur Vclurnes it SIM (PM) 5ignalixed 1veh/hrl '`✓ Intersedion '4) L.n L+ r4 tJ 267 (193) ♦ r^ 36139} ,L 691 Fit} 4) W oto ti 15 118) +) fi L Queen Kaahumanu Hwy I North @ Unsignaiized Stop 51gr, Intersection Figure 5: Existing 2019 Peale Hour Volumes 10 Royal Vistas SSFM Incernartronal C. Traffic Operation Analysis 1. Level of Service Methodology Level of Service (LOS) Es an operational analysis rating systern used in traffic engineering to rnea5ure the effectiveness of roadway operating conditions. There are six LOS ranging from A to F. LOS A is defined as being the least interrupted flow conditions with little or no delays, whereas LOS F is defined as conditions where extreme delays exist. Guidelines from the County of Hawaii Chapter 25 (Zoning), Article 2 (Administration and Enforcement), Division 4 (Amendrrtents), Section 46 (Concurrency Requirements) state that an"Acceptable level of service" means that the level of service of atramportation facility atthe a.m. and p.m. peak hour is "Y' or better. Level of service, or LOS, means a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream and shall be determined using the procedures in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board. Intersection LCIS and delay were determined for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro 10 traffic analysis software and analyzed using PCM 6"' Edition (TRB, 2016) methodologies. As stated in the HighwnV Capacity ManuuJ (HCM) 61n Edition (TRB, 2016), LOS for a two-way stop controlled (TWSC) intersection is determined by the measured control delay (see Table 3) and is defined for each movement. Vehicles traveling along the major, free-flow road, of a T SC intersection, proceed through with minimal delay or no delay at all. Those vehicles approaching the intersection along the minor movement are controlled by a stop sign and thus experience delay attributable to the volume of vehicles passing along the free -flog road and the gaps available. Table 3: LOS Criteria for Llnsignalized Intersections Average Control Delay (sfvei7) LOS by v/c Ratio <-1..0 >1.0 <_ i0.0 A F >10 and 515 B F >15 and 525 C F >25 and 535 D F >35 and S50 E F >50 F F Source: HCM (TRB, 20 16) The LOS analysls for signalized intersectlons is based on average total vehicle delay based on the rmethodologles of the HCNJ (TRB, 2016), as shown in Table 4. The HCM 6'h Edition doesn't support the analysis with both exclusive and shared lanes. In those cases, methodulogies frorn HCM (TRR, 2400) are used. Another measure of intersection delay is the volume to capacity (v/c) ratio. This is the ratio of the volume of traffic utilizing the intersection compared to the maximum volume of vehicles that can be accommodated by the intersection during a specific period. A v/c ratio under 0.85 means the intersection 11 Royal Vistas SSFM Intemarttonal is operating under capacity and excessive delays are not experienced. An intersection is operating near its capacity when v/c ratios range from 0-85 to 0.95. Unstable flaws are expected when the v/c ratio is between 0,95 and 1.0. A traffic movement can have a poor LCIS but lava v/c, which suggests that the traffic volumes along that movement are lover but must wait a longtime to make the movement. This is common for loan volume protected turn movements or side streets that must wait through a long cycle length for their split to come up. Table 4: LOS Criteria for Signalized Intersections Average Control [May (s/veh) LOS by v/[ Natio LOS by v/C Ratio =1.0 >=1.0 510.0 A F >10 and X20 B F >20 and 535 C F >35 and <_55 D F >55 and 580 E F >80 F F Source: HCM (TRB, 2016) Where signalized intersectlons are less than 2.0 miles apart, the facility should be Classified as an urban street and analyzed with the methodologies of Urban Street Facilities (HCM, Chapter lei). For Urban Street Facilities, through vehicle travel speed is used to analyze vehicular LOS. This speed reflects the factors that influence running time along each link, and the delay incurred: by through vehicles at each boundary intersection. This performance measure indicates the degree of mobility provided by the facility. 2. Existing 2019 Intersection LOS Existing intersection and movement LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours, 1. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Palani Road. Overall Intersection LOS = C/C (AM/PM) All movernents at the signalized Intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Palani Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours, 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Henry Street Overall Intersection LOS= C/C (AMJPM) All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahun-ranu Highway with Henry Street resulted in appropriate LOS D ar better during AM and PM peak hours. 3. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) At the unsignalized intersect;on of Queen Kaahurnanu Highway with Hualalai Street (north), eastbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 1.31 and 0.23 respectively] and long delays during bath AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway_ The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours.. 12 Royal Vistas SSFM International 4„ Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) At the unsignaliaed intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Road (south), westbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 0.18 and 0.31 respectively) and long delays during both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Ksahurnanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 5. Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street Overall Intersection LOS = A/A (AM/PM) The AM left turns operate at LOS l=. The westbound left turn Operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour. The left turn volumes are low and should clear every cycle. These delays are due to the cycle length. 6. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway At the unsignaliaed intersection of Queen Kaahurnanu Highway with Kuakiini Highway, eastbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 1.08 and 0.46 respectiveiy) and long delays during bath AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Lako Street. Overall Intersection LOS = C/C (AMIPM) At the signali2ed intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Lako Street, the eastbound left turn operates at LOS E during the AM peak hour. This delay is attributed to the high eastbound left turn volume, and the split phasing for the Lako Street approaches. All other movements at Lako Street operates at LOS 0 or better during both peak hours,. 8. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kamehameha III Road. Overall Intersection LOS = B/C (AM/PM) All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kamehameha III Road resulted in appropriate LOS Q or better during AM and PM peak hours. Tables 5 and 6 show the existing vehicular delay and level of service at each intersection. The shaded row indicates the overall intersection delay. 5ynchro output is in Appendix C. 3. Existing 2019 Traffic Signal Warrant Four -Hour and Peak -Hour traffic signal warrants were evaluated at the unsignallzed intersections. The 2009 M[JTCD states: "At an intersection with high volume of left -turn traffic from the major street, the signal warrant analysis may be performed in a manner that considers the higher of the major -street left - turn volumes as the'minor-street' volume and the cerresponding single direction of apposing traffic on the major street asthe'major-street" volume' For analysis purposes, the Queen Kaahumanu Highway left turn was considered the minor street approach, and the opposing through volume was considered the major street approach. The satisfaction of a warrant does not necessarily require installing a traffic signal. The single Peak Hour warrant especially is not a good measure of whether or not a traffic signal should be installed in this setting. It is being evaluated and provided only as an Indicator of when an intersection should be monitored. Traffic Signal Warrant analysis can be found in Appendix J. For the Four -Hour warrant, Figure 4C-2 (MUTCd) was used since the pasted speed limit on Queen Kaahumanu Highway is over 40 MPH. The °1 Lane & 1 Lane" curve was used for analysis. Table 7 shows the Four -Hoar warrant analysis. 13 Royal Vistas 55FM International For the Peak -Hour warrant, Figure 4C-4 �MUTCD) was used since the posted speed limit on Queen Kaahurnanu Highway is over 40 MPH. The "1 Lane & 1 Lane" curare was used for analysis. Table 8 snows the Peak -Hour warrant analysis. 1. Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) This intersection passes the Four -Hour warrant and the Peak -Hour warrant in the AM peak hour. 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) This intersectlon does not pass either warrant, 3. quem Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway This intersection passes the Four -Hour warrant and the Peak -Hour warrant in both the AM and PMI peak hours. Intersection Table S: Existing 2016 Intersection Level of Service Delay (s) I v/c I LOS belay (s) PM v/c j LOS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Palani Rd (overall) 23.7 - C 26.1 - C (ween Kaahumanu E8 Left 38.6 0.45 L) 38.D 0.74 D Queen Kaahumanu ES Through 14.1 C.30 B 17.9 0.57 B Queen Kaahumanu WB Left 38.9 0.67 D 38,8 0,72 D ween Kaahumanu WB Through 14.2 0.42 B 16,4 0.41 P Palani PJB Left 37.4 0.72 D 39,1 033 L, Palani N5 Through 25.8 0.25 C 25,8 0.42 C Palani 5B Left 47.7 0.50 D 46,3 0.68 D Palani SB Thi SOU %?^ 01 66 C 33,6 0.62 C Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Henry St (averall) Queen Kaahumanu EH Left 31.8 411, 24.6 0.62 C D 32.6 0.65 C 0.50 461,7 0.65 D [ween Kaahumanu EO Through 0.34 C 27,8 0.57 C Queen Kaahumanu Ela Dight 22.0 0.08 C 23,1. 0.19 C Queen Kaahumanu WB Left 45.0 0.37 b 45,4 0.52 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 30.5 0.60 C 31.0 0156 C Queen Kaahumanu WB Right 25.9 0.31 C 26,7 0.21 C HenryNB Left 34.9 0.46 C 35.9 0,41 D Henry NB Left-ThrDugh 35.8 0.58 D 37,1 0.56 D Henry SIB Right 31.0 0.03 C 32,5 0.02 C Henry SR Left 38.3 0.72 D 39.3 0,73 D Henry SB Left -Through -Right 34.6 0.69 C 34,2 0.67 C Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy & Hualalai (N) (overall) 14.3 1.0 Queen Kaahurnana NB Left 10 8 0.22 B 11,2 0,13 B Hualalai EB Left 429.0 1.31. F 107.3 0.23 F 14 Royal Vistas Table 6: Existing 2019 Intersection Level of Service (continued) SSFM Inremational Intersection AM PM Delay (s) vjc LOS Delay (s) v/c LiJS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (S) (overall) 3.3 - - 1.7 - - Queen Kaahumanu 5B Left 11.5 0.13 B 10.9 0.09 B Hualalai WB Left 87.5 0.18 F 112,9 0.31 F Hualalai WB Right 35.8 0.58 E 20.4 0.24 C Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Puapuaanu St (overall) 9.7 - A 9.8 - A Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 60.4 C_71 E 53,1 OM D Queen Kaahumanu W8 Through 3.3 0.50 A 3.0 0.57 A Puapuaanul WB Left 55.4 0.78 E 56.D 0.62 E PuapU,1,111 1 WB Right 7.9 0-54 A 8.5 0.63 A Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kuakini Hwy (overall) Queen Kaahumanu NE L+ -ft 7..7 17.6 - 0.67 - C 2.8 12.1 - 0.33. - B Kuakini EB Left 1035.4 1.08 F 208.2 0.45 F Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Lako St (overall) 30.6 - C 21.8 - C Queen Kaahurnanu NB Left 12.8 x].10 B 12.9 0.14 B Queen Kaahumanu NB Through Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 30.4 21.9 0.37 0.58 C C 18,3 33.5 0.75 0.51 B B Queen Kaahumanu 58 Through 19.2 0.68 B 20.1 0.82 C Lako EB Left 6f}.2 0.88 F 44.1 0.76 FD Lako EBThrough-{light 34.1 0.16 C 35.7 0.17 lD Lako WB Left 5{}_5 4.66 D 45.9 0.64 D Laky WB Through -Flight 44.5 C.33 D 41.2 0.39 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Karn III Rd (overall) 17.7 - B 22.0 - C Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 43.5 0.79 D 47.2 0.75 D Queen Kaahumanu NB Through 12.4 0.55 B 17.4 0.60 B Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 42.2 0.46 1] 45.7 0.48 D Queen Kaahumanu 5B Through 10.3 0.27 B 14.0 0.34 B Kamehameha EB Left -Through 32.0 0-73 C 34.1 0.84 C Kamehameha WB Left -Through -Right 41.4 0.6E D 44,9 0.61 D 15 Royal Vistas SSFM International Table 7: Foor-Hour Warrant based on 2019 traffic volumes Existing - Hualalai (N) 4 -Hour Warrant major Minor Warrant? 6:45-7:45 AM 776 164 YES 7:45-8:45 AM 692 145 YES 3:00-4:00 PM 1005 84 YES 4;00-5:00 PM 926 74 YES S;fJU-G:DQ PM 986 58 NO =,,1xistil,ng - (5) 4 -Hour 12Varrant Major nw irtcr I Warrant!' 6:45-7:45 AM 1D06 70 YES 7:45-8:45 AM 1D30 26 Nt) 3:00-4:00 PM 940 59 NO 4:00-5:00 PM 864 64 NO 5;00-6:00 PM 765 56 NO Existing - ICuakinl 6:45-7:45 AM 4+lour'L+Uarrant Major 776 Minos 1`Varrant? 335 YES 7.45-8:45 AM 583 467 YES 3:00-4:00 PM 881 224 YES 4:00-5:110 PM 872 264 YES 5:00-6.00 PM 870 217 YES Table & Peak -Hour Warrant based on 2019.traffic volurnesl Existing Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrorit? 1-luala9ai (N) 775 164 YES 1005 94 NO Hualalai (5) 1006 73 NO 940 61 NO Kuakini 733 517 YES 887 243 YES 5i;i& Peak Hour warrant was evaluated because sufficient data was available and to give an indication of whether or not an intersection should be considered and rrmonitored for a traffic signal, 16 Royal Vistas SSFM Inremartional III. Near -Term (2024) — Completion of Phase 1 A. Surrounding Areas Phase 1 is expected to be completed by 2024, representing the 5 -year future forecast. Phase 1 will contain 258 dwelling units, and the only point of access will be the Royal Vistas Roadway intersecting with Queen Kaahuman u Highway, about 600 feet north of the Kuakini Highway intersection. The official Transportation Network Map — Nani Kai Iua Area from the Kona Community development Plan shown future connections of 'minor collectors` running parallel to Queen Kaahurnanu Highway in the location of Royal Vistas, extending Hoomama Street to Leilani Street and Paulehia Street to Kekuanaoa Place, as shown in Figure b. The timing of these improvements is undetermined, but it is not expected they will he completed prior to 2024, The most IlkL-ly scenario is that tate developers of Royal Vistas will complete a collector to the south before Phase 2 is occupied, Based on the HDOT Federal -AW Highways 2035 TransportatOn Marr for the District of Nowcaii (July 2014), Kuakini Highway from HenryStreet to Kamehameha III Road will be widened by 2 travel lanesand include bicycle facilities and sid8walks, Bike Plan Hawaii (2003) references several near-term projects. Two of the projects nearby are: a signed shared road on Kuakini Highway from bake Street to Hualalai Road, and a signed shared road on Queen Kaahumanu Highway from Henry Street to Kuakini Highway. The 2011 Statewide Pedestrian Master Plan does not include any pedestrian facility upgrades or construction in the project area. No other significant developments or future construction projects are expected in the surrounding area that would significantly affect the roadway geornetrics or traffic volumes at the study intersections. This is based on research completed on October 10, 2019 at the State of Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEaC) website and the Statewide Transportation Improvements Program (STIP), The projects referenced in the long-rartge transportation plan and Bike plan Hawaii are not found in the STIP, The impacts of these projects were not considered in this TIAR. 17 Royal Vistas SSFf44 fntemartional 1 '��� �w h q 1T A ' iM r r srla Propos-pd Ro4ck C#a%if cabo-w PTWOmed Tw mit bane' F • ":DP l" M Tr1x* i COP, glM"W. PkA a r = Svmndary cnp, emwwr- prxrana TY nu[ "b, .A, calb,dff� m4 T'anar '.S�r�rxr' aP. ¢:IMrr[[r m^nry Pedee[riarl4biNc Pmrhs RCaFj' TOO Type T -V PE N091-rcri.X4 41 � M �' •'Bh k . erle A1rGar A.rmr` `�h a MF?wt1 Tom T raise w - Ezlsaaa P,wYt,�ay �-.. S19ener] �— �enJlieT Policy Lagar mocz Feel '' inch equ4s 2 d©O Source: County of iliawah 77w County of Hawaii Manning Department is the repository Of Ole Offirc i map 4, I - - I'x .SII S ti d do-'? f'Xna CLimmtjn?ty Deve oment Blair Figure 6: Kona Community development Plan 18 Royal Vistas SSFM inrernartional 8. Volumes 1. Future 2024 Without Project Volumes The project study area within Kona has been experiendng modest growth. HOOT AIT counts an Queen Kaahumanu Highway between Nan[ Ka[lua Drive and Hualalai Road didn't show any increase in vehicular volurnes from 2015 to 2015. The 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Plan forecasts average daily traffic in. Kana on Hawaii Belt Road to be 41,900 vehicles in 2020 and 48,000 vehicles in 2035. This equates to a 1% annual growth rate over 15 years in the Kenna area. A background growth rate of 1`}'a per year was assumed, to account for additional traffic at the study intersections. The estimated future volumes without the project for the future year 2024 are shown in Figure 7. 2. Project Related 'Volumes The proposed Royal Vistas include 258 multi -family residential dwelling units for Phase 1. All of these are expected to be low rise units with two or three stories. Trips generated from the proposed facility were estimated using nationally accepted land use rates from the Trig Generation, 10`' Edition (ITE, 2016). ITE defines the Multi -family Housing ILow Rise) Land Use 1220] as follows: `includes apartments, townhouses and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units" The analysis used 2.58 dwelling units as the independent variable to estimate new trips expected from the proposed project. The estimates for new trips generated by the project are shown in Table 9. Table 9. Estimated Trips Generated - Phase 1 T = Total number of trips generated, X = Dwelling Units :3. Trip Distribution Trips generated by the Royal Vistas Phase 1 will enter and exit at the Royal Vistas Roadway and be distributed onto Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The trips were distributed according to existing travel patterns. The segment volumes between Puapuaanui Street and Kua kini Street were used to determine the, inbound percent distr[bution. z In and Out split provided by Trip Generation, 10' Edition (ITE 2016) for Land Use 220 19 AM PM Land Use [ITE Code] Equation Equation Multi -family housing (Low Rise) [220] Ln (T) = 0.95 Ln (X) — [x.51 Ln (T) = f?,S9*Ln (X) -O,OZ Dwelling Units 258 25$ New Trips 117 137 Int Out In out 23% 77% 639 37% 27 90 86 51 T = Total number of trips generated, X = Dwelling Units :3. Trip Distribution Trips generated by the Royal Vistas Phase 1 will enter and exit at the Royal Vistas Roadway and be distributed onto Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The trips were distributed according to existing travel patterns. The segment volumes between Puapuaanui Street and Kua kini Street were used to determine the, inbound percent distr[bution. z In and Out split provided by Trip Generation, 10' Edition (ITE 2016) for Land Use 220 19 Royal Vistas 14. Palani Rd m 264 1133)- ` 194 (111) n 91 (ai51 D :S-► 2a 143) M t4 112 (2100) M 377 1597) 1 (640) 13.0 1,305) r: Henry 171 1234 E 3 M75 S (273) f 4$4 165 1305 ) W (922) 2M 1529) e 27 }55) Palani Rd w N g Queen Kaahum nu Hwy Queen Kaal•rumanu Hv+ y �1 1� 4G �[ u 46 111) 50170 b� s 1471751 �-1151 D rG M 14. Queen Kaahurr7anu Hwy SSFM interna Gonal F-p1)ry t m 264 1133)- ` 194 (111) n 91 (ai51 D :S-► w M t4 Queen Kaahurr7anu Hwy SSFM interna Gonal F-p1)ry t m 264 1133)- ` 491 13 30 ) 2 N Q rth 631 15761 :S-► 55 ice) E 112 (2100) M 377 1597) 1 13.0 1,305) Henry 5t E Queen KaahUmanu Hwy m ZO 1 7: � 7 �iap I -C 178 139 1) 261 (203) 38 141) 73 (65) c tffLE 4 PeakHour V�atumes # M AM (PM) I' Signalized Unsignalized Iveh/hr) Intersection Intersection Figure 7: Future 2021 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 20 264 1133)- 50(32) 73 (5o) CC m o 15 (Lg) (12) E S 165 1305 ) +) 7T 5113} 27 }55) Queen Kaahum nu Hwy c tffLE 4 PeakHour V�atumes # M AM (PM) I' Signalized Unsignalized Iveh/hr) Intersection Intersection Figure 7: Future 2021 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 20 Royal Vistas SSFM Inrernartional Based on the existing traffic volumes on Queen Kaahurnanu Highway between Puapuaanui Street and Lako Street, the AM peak hour &rection is northbound, ,and the PM peak hour direction is southbound. Table 10 shows the directional percentages at Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street that were used to determine the inbound trip distribution, Table 10: 2019 Volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway between Puapuaanui at and Kuakini Highway The outbound volumes at Puapuaanui Street were used to determine the outbound percent distribution. Royal Vistas will have the same land use as Pualani Estates, which is just north of Royal Vistas and currently uses Puapuaanui Street as the rnain access to queen Kaahumanu Highway. Outbound traffic distribution for Puallani Estates at Puapuaanui Street is anticipated to have a similar outbound distribution at Royal Vistas Roadway. Table 11 shows the existing outbound volumes for Pualani Estates at Puapuaanui Street during the AM and PM peak ;lours_ The percentages shown in Table 11 were used for the outbound trip distribution at the Royal Vistas Roadway intersecting Qoeen Kaahumanu Highway. Table 11: 2019 Outbound volumes at Puapuaanui Street AM l'r i� PM NR 5th NB SB Volume 877-' I s1 873 940 Percent 52% 4&, 48% 52% The outbound volumes at Puapuaanui Street were used to determine the outbound percent distribution. Royal Vistas will have the same land use as Pualani Estates, which is just north of Royal Vistas and currently uses Puapuaanui Street as the rnain access to queen Kaahumanu Highway. Outbound traffic distribution for Puallani Estates at Puapuaanui Street is anticipated to have a similar outbound distribution at Royal Vistas Roadway. Table 11 shows the existing outbound volumes for Pualani Estates at Puapuaanui Street during the AM and PM peak ;lours_ The percentages shown in Table 11 were used for the outbound trip distribution at the Royal Vistas Roadway intersecting Qoeen Kaahumanu Highway. Table 11: 2019 Outbound volumes at Puapuaanui Street The future 'with project' scenario analyzed the Royal Vistas Roadway approach to have a left turn and a right turn lane. Turn lanes are provided for the southbound left turn and northbound right turn into Royal Vistas. Right turns are channelized. A peak hour traffic signal wvarrant and a 4 -hour traffic signal warrant were conducted for the new Royal Vistas Roadway. The new roadway intersection did not warrant a signal during the AM or PM tweak hour. This intersection was analyzed as a two-way stcp-controlled intersection, Ati crosswalk would be provided on the east side of the intersection for pedestrian connectivity. A refuge lane forwestbound leftturns onto [ween Kaahumanu Highway is recommended asthis isan unsignaliaed intersection and will make this turn easier far the driver. The expected future lane configuration is shuwvn in Figure S. Project related trips for 2024 (Phase 1) are shown in Figure 9. 4. Future 2024 with Project Volumes Phase 1 project related trips were added to the Future 2024 Without Project volumes to estimate Future 2424 With Project pear hour volumes (see Figure 10). Hourly Volumes taken from 2'019 intersection counts at Puapuaanui Street. 21. Affil l'r i� WISR VJBL WBR '° l Li Volurr�e 185 87 107 P rrter�t fis% 37% 75% X4.1 The future 'with project' scenario analyzed the Royal Vistas Roadway approach to have a left turn and a right turn lane. Turn lanes are provided for the southbound left turn and northbound right turn into Royal Vistas. Right turns are channelized. A peak hour traffic signal wvarrant and a 4 -hour traffic signal warrant were conducted for the new Royal Vistas Roadway. The new roadway intersection did not warrant a signal during the AM or PM tweak hour. This intersection was analyzed as a two-way stcp-controlled intersection, Ati crosswalk would be provided on the east side of the intersection for pedestrian connectivity. A refuge lane forwestbound leftturns onto [ween Kaahumanu Highway is recommended asthis isan unsignaliaed intersection and will make this turn easier far the driver. The expected future lane configuration is shuwvn in Figure S. Project related trips for 2024 (Phase 1) are shown in Figure 9. 4. Future 2024 with Project Volumes Phase 1 project related trips were added to the Future 2024 Without Project volumes to estimate Future 2424 With Project pear hour volumes (see Figure 10). Hourly Volumes taken from 2'019 intersection counts at Puapuaanui Street. 21. Royal Vistas SSFM International m m m IW IV m P'alani Rd 4— Henry St Queen ;K -- alaniRd Henry St To Royal Vistas Roadway Hualalai Rd (North) J T { I �r I North U T A r I Figure 8: Expected Future Cane Configuration W E rQ f0 Eh Y � QueenKaahurnanu Highway To Kuakini Highway PieA OVVOlumes Si nalized k. � ;p � unsi nalited ( � .�. Step Sign AM JPM) iveb/hrp — lnker�ettion Inter -section Figure 8: Expected Future Cane Configuration W Royal Vistas Mani Rd a 5 p51 C m m m IW IV Palani Rd To Roya I Vistas Roadway M. Henry St ii (Si} 27I2CMI 20 Henry St Hualalai Fid (Worth) Queen SSFM International I North Figure 9; Phase 1 Project Related Trips 23 T111)�i %S~. W � l� /�71II S � r Figure 9; Phase 1 Project Related Trips 23 %S~. l� /�71II S � y � �...i T E E Queen Kaahumanu Highway To Kuakini Highway legend #(N) Pe-A-HOurvOlumes�' Signalized S Unsignalited Stop Sign OU AM IPM} �Veb/hry Intersection Intersection Figure 9; Phase 1 Project Related Trips 23 Royal Vistas SSFM International - Palani Rd _ Henry St - - Z. 51a c341} C -6M (M -- f North 57 17511 ' Queen x T 3e 75 42731--,7112 R{ICtj C C 484 1941} IW :�"9 43291 Li 2310 f 3>I95w G tib m Palam Rd Henry St To Royal Vistas Roadway Hualalai Fid (North) i f { 51 {77} � 14' 175, U 9115} � 1 m ial r .S..' fro I ] 38r y sy '3 {501 hjf OA! W 15 12M 0Cc 4 ?; —13}lit — 61(39} -_ Oa 5 132? •--'� � � � �� Queen Kaahum,anu H i hv.,ay To Kuakini H%hway PeO, HOuF vP!k : 5ignaliaed Unsignaiited � � MJ �. Stop Sign AM JPMi (ver) riq — dntL,rgection Intersection Figure 10. Future 2024 With Project Peak Hour Volumes 24 Royal Vistas SSFM Inrernartional C. Future 2024 Intersection Traffic Operation Analysis 1. Future 2024 Without Project Intersection LOS The 2074 Without Project intersection and movernent LOS and average delay (in Seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours. 1. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Palani Road, Overall Intersection LOS = C/C (AM/PM) All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Pa€ani Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or Fetter during AM and PM peak hours. 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Henry Street, Overall Intersection LOS = CIC (AM/PM) All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Henry Street resulted in appropriate LCIS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. 3. Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) At the unsignaliaed intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Street (north), eastbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 1.65 and 0.30 respectively) and long delays during both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable lq vels of service during the AM and PM peak hours, 4. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Road (south), westbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 0.22 and 0.39 respectively) and long delays during both AI's and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. S. Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Puapuaanui 'Street. Overall Intersection LOS = B/B (AM/PM) The AM westbound left tura movement from Hualalai Road and southbound [eft turn movements from Queen K Highway operate at LOS E. The westbound left turn operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour. The left turn volumes are low and should clear every cycle. These delays are due to the cycle length. 6. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kuakini Highwvay, eastbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 1.51 and 0.62 respectively) and long delays during both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the Af'k11 and PM peak hours. 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Lake Street, Overall Intersection LOS = D/C (AM/PM) At the signalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Lake Street, the eastbound left. turn operates at LOS E during the ANN peak hour. This delay is attributed to the high eastbound left turn volume, and the split phasing for the Laky Street approaches. All other movements at Lako Street operates at LOS 0 or better during both peak hours. S. Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Kamehameha III Road. Overall Intersection LOS = B/C (AM/PM) All movements at the sipnahied intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kamehameha III Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak Fours. 25 Royal Vistas SSFM inrernartional Tables 12 and 13 show the expected 2024 vehicular delay and level of service at each intersectican. The shaded row indicates the overall intersection delay. 5ynchro output is in Appendix D. Table 12: Future 2024 without Project Intersection Level of Service Intersection AM PM Delay (s) VIL LOS Delay (s) vJc LOS Queen Kaahomanu Hwy 3� Palani Rd (overall) 24.3 - i C 27.1 - C Queen Kaahumanu ;..- Queen Kaahumanu EB Through 39.2 0.47 U 39.3 0.76 L3 14.8 0.32 B 19.2 0.51 B Queers Kaahumanu WB Left 39.3 0.68 D 40.1 0,73 D Queen Kaahumanu W8 Through 1.4.9 0.45 B 17.4 0.44 B Palani NB Deft 37.8 0.73 D 40.5 0.74 D Palani NB Through 25.7 0,26 C 28.9 4.42 C Palani 5B Left 48.1 0,51 D 49.8 0.71 D Palani SBThrough 34.0 0.66 C 33.9 0,63 C Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Henry St (overWI) 52.4 0.65 C 33.8 0.68 C Queen Kaahumanu EB Left 45.2 0,53 D 49.7 0,69 D Queen Kaahumanu EB Through 25.7 4.37 C 29.3 0-60 C ClL,.enEB Right 22.8 0,09 C 24.0 0.20 C -Kaahumanu `"i ill'.: l „�r�u WB Left 40.1 0.40 D 50.9 0.57 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 32.3 0,65 C 32.6 0.6D C Queen Kaahumanu WE Bight 27.9 0.33 C: 27.6 4.2.2 C Henry NB Left 35.4 0.48 D 36.3 0.42 D Henry NB Left -Through 36.6 0.60 D 37.9 0.58 D Henry NB Right 31.3 0.03 C 32.8 0.02 C Henry SB Left 39.3 0,74 D 40.2 0.75 D Henry SB Left -Th rough-Rigl-it 35.2 0.71 D 34.8 0.59 C Queen Kaahumanu Navy & Hualalai (N) (overall) 14.1 1.2 Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 11.2 0,24 B 11.5 0.14 B Huala!ai EB Left 603.1 1.65 I 135.9 0.30 F Queer, Kaahumanu Hwy & Huaialai (5) (oversii) 4.0 - - z•0 - - Queen Kaahumanu 58 Left 12.0 0.14 B 11.1 0.10 B Hualalai WB Left 105.7 4.22 F 143.3 0.39 F Hualalai Wg Right 43.7 0,65 E 22.1 0.27 C 26 Royal Vistas 5SFM Inremattonal Table 13: Future 2024 Without Project Intersection Level of Service lcontinuedj Irltersectior! AM PM Delay (s) v/c LOS Delay (s) v/c LiJS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Puapuaanui St (overall) 10.2 - B 1.0.5 - Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 61.3 0.73 E 54,4 0.81 D Queen Kaahumanu WE Through 3,6 Q52 A 3.3 0.60 A Puapuaanul WB Left 55.2 0.78 E 56.2 0.53 E Puapuaanul WB Right 8.1 068 A 9, 0.66 A Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kuakini Hwy (overall)9.8 3.5 - Queen Kaahurnanu NB Left 3C. 1 C, C 12,8 0,36 D Kuakini EB Left Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Lako St (overall) Queen Kaahumanu NB Left E'r}. 35.4 14.1 I i - D 0.12 B =,{ i. l C..+; F 24.5 - C 14.8 0.17 B Queen Kaahumanu NBThrough 38.0 0.93 D 21,4 0.80 C Queen Kaahumanu 5B Left 30.1 0.74 C 16'a 0.58 B Queen Kaahumanu SB Through 21,3 0.72 C 23,5 0,87 C Laky EB Left 63.7 0.89 E 44.5 0.77 D Lako EB Th rough -Right 34.1 0.16 C 35.7 0.17 D Lako W9 Left 51.1 0.68 D 46,1 0,65 D Laky UVB Through -Right 4.4.9 0.33 D 41,4 D.40 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Karn III Rd (overall) 18.2 - B 23.3 - C Queen KaahumanO NB Left 43.1 0.79 D 49,0 0.78 D Queen Kaahumanu NB Through 13.3 0.58 B 19.0 0.64 9 Queen Kaahumanu SH Left 42.1 C.47 D 46,1 0,49 D Queen Kaahumanu SBThraugh 10's 0.28 B 14.8 0,36 B Karneharnelia ES Left -Through 32.0 0.74 C 35,7 0.85 D Kamehameha WB Left -Through -Right 42.1 0.65 D 45.7 0.63 D 2. Future 2024 With Project Intersection LOS The 2024 With Project intersection and movement LOTS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours. MOTE: All Royal Vistas vehicles are routed through the ane Royal Vistas Access Roadway to Queen Kaahumanu Highway for purposes of the Phase 1 analysis. 1. Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Palani Road, Overall Intersection LCS = CIC (AM/PM) All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Palani Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or Fetter during AM and PMI peak hours. 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Henry Street. Overall Intersection LOS = C/C (AM/Ph1) All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Henry Street resulted iri appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours - 3. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) 27 Royal Vistas SSFM Inremational At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Street (north), east -bound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 1.98 and 0.34 respectively) during Goth AM and PM peak hours are due to nigh through volumes on Clueen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 4. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) At the unsignalized intersection of Queen KaEahumaru Highway with Hualalai Road (south), westbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 0-24 and 4.34 respectively) during berth AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The westbound right turn also operates at LOS F (v/c of 0,71) Buri ng the AM peak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of - c -,-vice during the AM and PM peak hours. 5, Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street. Overall Intersection LOS = 8/8 (,4M/PM) The ANI left turns operate at LOS E. The westbound left turn operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour. The left turn volumes are law and should clear every cycle. These delays are due to the cycle length. 5. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Royal Vistas Roadway At the proposed unsignalized intersection of queen Kaahumanu Highway and the Royal Vistas Roadway, the southbound left turn movement from Queen Kaahumanu Highway into Royal Vistas Roadway functions well, with minimal delay, an average of 10 to 11 seconds during both peak hours, The westbound left turning movement has 1-05 F (v/c of 0.41 and U,V respectively) during both AM (29 vehicles) and PM (12 vehicles) peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahurnanu Highway. The Intersection functions acceptably, with, an average of 2.0 seconds of delay per vehicle in the AM peak hour and 1.2 seconds of delay per vehicle in the PM peak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kuakini Highway, eastbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 1.85 and .68 respectively) during both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on [ween Kaahumanu Highway, The major and other mi or movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peau hours. 8. queen Kaahumanu Highway and Lako Street. overall' Intersection LCIS = b/C (AM/PM) At the signalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway With Lako Street, the eastbound left turn operates at LCIS E during the ANI peak hoar. This delay is attributed to the high eastbound left turn volume, and the split phasing for the Lakc Street approaches. Al I other movements at Lako Street operates at LOS D or better during both peak hours. 9. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kamehamehar III Road. Overall Intersection LOS = B/C (AM/PM) All movements at the signalized Intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kamehameha III Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. Tables 14 and 15 shew the expected vehicular delay and level of service at each intersection_ The shaded row indicates the overall intersection delay. Synchro output is in Appendix E, 28 Royal Vistas Table 14: Future 2024 With Project Intersection Level of Service 55FM International Intersection AM pm Delay (s) v/C LOS Delay {s] v/CL05 Queen Kaahumanu Hw & Palani Rd (overall) 24.2 - C 27.2 - C Queen Kaahumanu ES Left 39.2 0.47 D 39.3 0.76 D Queen Kaahumanu EB Through 14,9 0.33 B 15,5 0.62 B Queen Kaahumanu WE Left 39.3 0.68 D 44.2 0.74 D Queen Kaahurnanu W13 Through 15.1 0.46 B 17.5 0.45 B Palani NB Left 37,8 0.73 D 40.5 0,74 D Palani NB Through 25.7 0.26 C 28.9 0.42 C Palani SB Left 48.1 0.51 D 50.0 0.71 D Palani SB Through 34.0 0,56 C 34.0 0.63 C Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Henry St (overall} 33.2 0.66 C 34.1 0.69 C Queen Xaahumanu EB Left 45.5 0.54 D 49.9 0.69 D Queen Kaahumanu EG Through 26.1 0.38 C 30.0 0.63 C Queen Kaahumanu E8 Right 23.1 0.09 C 24.1 0.20 C Queen Kaahumanu WB Left 465 0.42 D 52.5 0.59 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 33.4 0.68 C 33,2. 0.62 C Queen Kaahumanu WE Right 28.5 0.34 C 27.8 0.22 C Henry Ng Left 35.7 0.48 D 36.4 0.42 D Henry NB Left -Through 36.9 0.60 D 38.0 0.59 D Henry NB Right 31.5 0.03 C 32.9 0.02 C Henry SB Left 38.4 0.72 D 40.4 0.76 D Henry5B Left -Through -Right 34-8 0.70 C 35.0 0.70 D Queers IKashumanu Hwy & Hualalai (N) (overall) 17.7 - - 1.3 - - Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 11.3 0.26 B 11.9 0.15 B Hualalai EB Left 1 789.5 1.95 r 163.1 0,34 F Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (S) (overall) 4.5 - - 2.2 - - Queen 1{331^umanu 5Q Left 12,4 C. 1.5 B 11.3 0.10 B Hualala; W3 Left 121.6 0,24 F 172.6 0.44 F Hualalai WB flight 52.8 0.71 F 23.3 0.28 C Queen Kashurnanu Hwy & Puapuaanui 5t (overall) 10.8 - 8 10.8 - 8 Queen Kaakumanu 59 Left 61.3 0.73 E 54.5 0.81 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 3.7 0.53 A 3.6 0.63 A P'uapuaanui WB Left 55.1 0.78 E 56.4 0.64 E f'LMpi3aanui'A�R Right 9.3 0.73 A 10.1 0.59 B 29 Royal Vistas SSFM International Table 15: Future 2024 With Project Intersection Level of Service (continued) Intersection AM PM Delay (s) v/C LDS peat' (5) V/C LDS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kona Vista Rdwy�Querall) 2.0 - - 1.2 - - Qucen Kaahumanu SB Left 10,0 0.02 A 10.5 0.07 8 Kona Vista UVB Left 81.0 0•x}1 F 105,9 0.27 F Kona Vista WB Right 18.8 0.20 C 19.0 0.14 C Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kuakini Hwy (overall) 11.4 - - 3.7 - - Queen Kaahumanu N8 left 21,8 01.75 C 12.9 0.36 B Kuakini EB Left 1998.6 1.88 F 344,6 D. 68 F Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Lako St (overall) 36.9 - D 25.9 - C Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 14.6 0.12 B 15.8 0.18 Queen Kaahumanu NB Through 4().4 0.94 D 23.5 13.83 [ - Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 34.2 0.74 C 15.5 0.62 Queen Kaahumanu 56 Through Lako EB Left 22,2 65.4 0.74 0.90 C E 24.9 0.88 44.5 C [ L Lako EB Through -Right 34.1 0.16 C 35-5 Lako WB Left 51,3 0.68 D 46.2 0.65 Lako WB Through -Right 45.1 0.33 D 41.5 ia.40 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kam III Ltd (overall) 18.3 - B 24,1 - C Queen Kaahumanu NO Left 43.1 0.1) D 49.3 0.78 D Queen Kaahuranu NB Through 13.5 0.59 B 20,3 0.67 C Queen Kaahumanu 5B Left 42.2 03.47 D 46.5 0.49 D Queen Kaahumanu 5B Through Kamehameha EB Left -Through 10,9 32.0 0.23 0.74 B C 15.2 35.7 0.37 0.85 B D Kamehameha W8 Left -Through -Right 42,2 0.68 D 45.3 0.64 D 3. 2024 Traffic Signal Warrant Peak -Hour volume traffic: siGrial warrants were evaluated for the 2024 with anis without project scenarios. Table 1.5 shows the Peak -Hour warrant, analysis in 2024 With and without the project. Traffic Signal U1larrant analysts can be found in Appendix J. 1. Queen KaahurnanU Highway and Hualalai Road (North) This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warrant in the AM and RM peak hour with and without the project. 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warrarrt in the AM peak hou r with and without the project. 3• Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Royal Vistas Roadway This intersection does not pass the peak hoar warrant in either peak hour. 30 Royal Vistas SSFM International 4, Queen Kaahumanru Highway and Kunkini Highway This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warrant in the AM and PM peak hour with and without the project. Table 16: 2024 Peak -Hour Warrant 2024 Without Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Iv>Inor Warrant" Hull,-3lai (N) 816 172 YES 1056 98 Y F S Ilualalai (5) 1057 77 YES 988 64 NO Kuakini 842 513 YES 932 255YES 2024 With Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrantf Hualalai (N) 827 180 YES 1099, 91 YES Hualalai (5) 1.117 77 YES 1025 64 NO RKV Roadway 819 13 NO 912 45 NO Kuakini 85fi 543 YES 944 255 YES 4. 2024 With Project Segment LOS Arterial LDS was analyzed in 5ynchro on Queen Kaahumanu Highway from Hualalai (north) to Lako Street. Where signalized intersections are less than 2,0 mi apart, the facility should be classifled as an urban street and analyzed with the rnethodologies of Urban Street Facilities. For Urban Street Facilities, through• vehicle travel speed is used to analyze vehicular LCIS. Analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix E. The arterial LOS can be found in Table 17. Phis segment of [ween Kaahumanu Highway operates at LOS C in the northbound direction and LOS B in the south hound direction du ring the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, saUsfyringthe County of Hawaii Chapter 25 {2onjng), Article 2 (Administration and Enforcementy, Division 4 (Amendments), Section 45 (Concurrency Regnrrernents) regarding "acceptable level of service" for transportation facilities. Table 17: 2024 with Project Segment LOS 31. Northbound Southbound Speed trnph) LEIS Speed (mph) LCIS AM Peak Hour 18.3 C 25.3 B PM peak Hour 20.7 C 24.6 B 31. Royal Vistas SSFM !ntemartiona l IV. Mind -Term (2029) — Completion of Phase 2 A. Surrounding Area Conditions Phase 2 is expected to he corn pleted by 2029, representing the full buildout 14 -year future forecast. Phase 2 Will contain 192 dwelling units- Inbound trips and Phase 1 outbound trips continue to use the Royal Vistas Roadway and Clueen Kaahumanu Highway intersection. Based on the HDOT Federal -Aid Highwcys 2035 Tronsportation plan for the District of Hawarii (July 2014), Kvakini Highwayfrvrn Henry Street to Kamehameha Ili Road will bewidened by 2 travel lanesand include hicycle facilities and sidewalks - No other significant developments or future construction projects are expected in the Immediately surrounding area that would significantly affect the roadway geometrlcs or traffic volumes at the study intersections. This is based on research completed on October 10, 2419 at the State of Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQQ website and the Statewide Transportation Improvements Program (STIP). The current STIP has a 4 -year outlook, from Fiscal Year 2019-2022. Future projIects may impact roadway geometrics or traffic volumes- The Mid -Term future analysis may need to be reanalyzed and updated if the kuakini Highway widening project is scheduled. This project was not included in the analysis_ B. Volumes 1. Future 2029 Without Project Volumes The project study area within Kona has been experiencing modest growth. HDOT ADT counts can Queen ICaahurnanu Highway between Mani Kailua Drive and Hua#alai Road didn't show any increase in vehicular volumes from 2015 to 2016. Similarly, the 2035 Federal .Aid Highways Lang Range Transportation Plan forecasts average daily traffic in Kona to be 41,900 vehicles in 2020 and 48,000 vehicles in 2035. This is approximately equal to a 1°r: annual growth rate. The estimated future volumes without the project for the future year 2029 are shown in Figure 11. 32 Royal Vistas ON GSf �A 25 (451 �.� 749 { 673 ) �•~-. 180 ( 246) \-• r 78(287)--7 Tr 505 (959) �—# 241 (556) Palani Rd.': -� Queen Kaaht w i - au Hwy �V u 49(u) 53 JT7) 14 C� 155 (78) uo � Y-� Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 'T3 C CL m SSFM International Henry Sc �–r lib {x1Ci) 397(-132) f 137 (321} " HenrySt 4 Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy Q81 46 3 E 8 (14) 187 (411) r sy �. 277 (140) 53 (33) 76 (53) W m L a, r- 17-1 173 (320) 6 (12) Q 29 (57) Legend Peak Hour 11clunnes it AM (PIV) 5ignalixed (veh/hrl '`✓ InteCsedion sa ZN N 295 (213) 76 () P 4) T (-I 00 W Y W r w� 17 1201 4-13 (12) ---�17 Tr Queen Kaahum nu Hwy r the L v E m w' I North @ Unsignalized Stop 51gr, Interseclion Figure 11: Future 2029 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 33 N I*7 [PGT11 516 (3471 ti � 633 (6b1:,; 57 {Sti) �–r lib {x1Ci) 397(-132) f 137 (321} " HenrySt 4 Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy Q81 46 3 E 8 (14) 187 (411) r sy �. 277 (140) 53 (33) 76 (53) W m L a, r- 17-1 173 (320) 6 (12) Q 29 (57) Legend Peak Hour 11clunnes it AM (PIV) 5ignalixed (veh/hrl '`✓ InteCsedion sa ZN N 295 (213) 76 () P 4) T (-I 00 W Y W r w� 17 1201 4-13 (12) ---�17 Tr Queen Kaahum nu Hwy r the L v E m w' I North @ Unsignalized Stop 51gr, Interseclion Figure 11: Future 2029 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 33 Royal Vistas SSFM Internartional 2. Project Related Volumes The pfoposed Royal Vistas include 192 multi -family residential dwelling units for Phase 2. All of these are expected; to be low rise units with two or three stories, Trips generated from the proposed facility were estimated using nationally accepted land use rates from the Tris Generation, 10': Edition ]ITE, 2015). ITE defines the Multi-#arnily Housing (Low Rise) Land Use (220] as follows: "includes apartments, townhouses and condominiums located within the same bulldirtig with at least three other dwelling units' The analysis used 192 dwelling units as the independent variable to estimate neve trips expected from Phase 2 of the proposed project. The estirnates for new trips generated by Phase 2 are shown in Table 18. Table 18: Estimated Trips Generated by Project — Phase 2 AM PM Land Use [ITE Code] Equation Equation Multi -family Housing (Low Rise) [220) Ln (T) = 0.95 Ln (X) — 0.51 Ln (T) = 0,99*Ln (X) 0.02 Dwelling Units 192 192 New Trips 89 105 Ino Out In Out 23% 77% 63% 379 20 59 67 39 T = Total number of trips generated, X = Dwelling fruits 3. Trip Distribution Tile trips were distributed ,according to existing travel volumes. The segment volumes between Puapuaanui Street and Kuakini Street were used to determine the inbound percent distribution. Future inbound trips will continue entering at the Royal Vistas Roadway at Queen Kaahumanu Highway, It is expected that orkce a connection to Lako Street is provided, Phase 2 left out tsouthbound traffic) will utilize the Lako Street intersection during the peak hours, since the traffic signal will provide guaranteed exit opportunities and drivers will not have to wait for a gap at the stop -controlled Loyal Vistas driveway_ Figure 12 shows the Future lane confi6uration, It is the same as Phase 1 lane configuration, Figure 13 shows the Phase 2 inbound project generated and distributed trips. Figure 14 shows the Phase 2 outbound project generates} and distributed trips. 4. Future 2029 With Project Volumes Phase 1 (Figure 9) and Phase 2 project related trips (f=igure 13 and Figure 14) were added to the Future 2029 Without Project volumes (Figure 11) to estimate Future 2029 With Project peak hour volumes (see Figure 15). " In and Out split provided by Trip Generation, 10" Edition (ITE 2016) for Land Use 220 34 Royal Vistas SSFM International m m m IW IV m Palani Rd 4— Henry St Queen x -- alaniRd Henry St To Royal Vistas Roadway Hualalai Rd (North) J T { �r I North Figure 12. Future lane Configuration for Phase 2 35 U E {p E 5c � QueenKaahurnanu Highway To Kuakini Highway �_ (1 Peas: HOV Volumes l end Signalized S p q,!U) Unsi nalized Stop Sign Am IPM} Nett%hr) lnter�ertion — Intersection Figure 12. Future lane Configuration for Phase 2 35 Royal Vistas M M M IW 1u M. M Mani Rd 31151'" Palani fico To RoyaIVis tasRoarfway j 2 (61 . S.. , 2 141 Henry St 4 Henry St Hualalai Rd (Worth) Queen X T c SSFM International I North m S iFs s E U2 1& Tr s '3 its R.1 {G ip E L: �? F i�ueen Kaahumanu Highway To Kuakini Highway Hour volumes Signalized Unsignafized { �. Stn p Sign � � AM IPM) �veh/hr) Intersection Intersection Figure 13: Phase 2 inbound Project Related Trips 36 Royal Vistas SSFM International C m m m IW IV 8 Mani Rd Palani Rd Henry St --16110}— 21 {15} 1111 � 212a Henry St Queen X sw T c I North To Royal Vistas Roadway Hualalai Fid (Worth) f 0 r� d 111 } --911 1 S.. S 1�1 47 (301 6A m n a1 a (U 3 E U 'cs - (U c tie i�ueen Kaahumanu Highway To Kuakini Highway l,� p n0 # (0) Peak Haut volurnes Signalized Unsignalited AM IPM) IVehf her) �m5 '1 lntersection OU Intersection Stop Sign Figure 14: Phase 2 Outbound Project Related Trips 37 Royal Vistas SSFM International Mani Rd _ _Hen St Queen x Ri �✓ 1♦ T 3�e 78 MTj 118 (2191 C 512 110031 " A06 f7T7 IW 2d] (556) F 2r' f321} w m �9a Palani Rd`:!bHenry St To RayalVistas Roadway Hualalai Fid (North) `g111� L Z 155 085 U --�� M 81!41 u L Y 127 14 11) r, r JI '� i n +-43 1." ,r 93 175; --,°-39 i4]. �[ S 2ra211+a�1 ��S I � 76 fsst 4�9 171211 r: —_ �—'13117.k — 2158 f68} J 18 18} N� 07 C * U ? anlss, h a E 291571 _ .7 15 Jo QueenKaahumandHl hv.,ay To Kuakini Highway 1p end # @aa� Ii�lue l'[:�. `, , Signalized r- Unsignalized _.:_-J$.— � � � � N.I � �.. 5 k o p 'Sign AM JPM} (ver)/riq — Intersection — Intersection Figure 15: Future 2029 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 38 Royal Vistas SSFM Inrernartronal C. Future 2029 Intersection Traffic Operation Analysis 1. Future 2029 Without Project Intersection LOS The 2020 Without Project intersection and movernent LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours, 1. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Palani Road, Overall Intersection LCJS = C/C (AM/PM) All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Palani Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Henry Street, OvErall Intersection LOS n C/D (AM/PM} All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Henry Street resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. 3. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) At the unsignaliaed intersection cf Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Street (north), eastbound left turning movement has LDS F (v/c of 2.20 and 0.37 respectively} and long delays during, both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of Service during the AM and PM peak hours, 4. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai toad (South), westbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 0.28 and 0.47 respectively) and long delays during both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The westbound right turn also operates at LOS F (v/c of .74) during the AM peak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 5. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street. Overall Intersection LOS = B/B (AM/PM) The southbound left turn operates at LOS E during the AM and PAA peak hoar. The westbound left turn operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour. These delays are due to the cycle length. The left turn volumes are IoW and should clear every cycle. 6. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway At the unsignaliaed intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kuakini Highwray, eastbound left turning Movernent has Las F (v/c of 2.87 and 0.79 respectively) and long; delays during both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Laky Street, Overall Intersection LOS = a/C (AM/PM) At the signalised intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Laku Street, the eastbound left. turn operates at LOS E during the AM peak hour. This delay is attributed to the high eastbound left turn volume, and the split phasing for the Lako Street approaches. The southbound left also operates at LOS E during the AM peak hour. All other movements at Lake Street operates at LOS R or better during loth peak hours_ 8, Queen Kaahumanu 11ighway and Kamiehameha III Road. Overall Intersection LOS = B/C (AM/PM) 39 Royal Vistas SSFM Inremational All moVements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kamehameha UI Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak lours. Tables 19 and 20 show the expected vehicular delay and level of service at each intersection. The shaded raw indicates the overall intersection delay. 5ynchro output is in Appendix F. Table 19� Future 2029 Without Project Intersection. Level of Service Intersection AM PM Delay (s) v/t LOS Delay (sl v/c LOS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Palani Ind (overall) Queen Kaahumanu E8 Left 24.9 39.8 - 0.49 C D 28.3 44.7 - C 0.77 D Queen Kaahumanu EB Through 15.7 0.35 B 20,7 0.65 C. Queen Kaahumanu W8 Left 39.8 0.69 D 41.6 0.75 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 15.7 0.47 B 18.5 0.47 B Palani NB Lett 38.3 0.74 D 42.0 0.75 D Palani NB Through Palani 56 Left 25.5 48.5 0.26 0.51 C D 28.9 51.3 0.43 C 0.73 D Palani SB Through 34.7 0.67 C 34.3 0.64 C Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Henry St (Overall) 34.0 0.57 C 35.2 0.71 D Queen Kaahumanu ES Left 47.6 0.58 D 53.1 0.74 D Queen Kaahumanu E8 Through 27.2 0.40 C 31.0 0.65 C Queen Kaahumanu ES Right 23.9 0.09 C 24.8 0.21 C Queen Kaahumanu WB Left 47.3 0.42 D 53.8 0.60 D Rueen Kaahumanu W5 Through 34.0 0.67 C 34.2 01.64 C Queen Kaahumanu WB Right 29.4 0.34 C 28.5 0.23 C Henry NB Left 35.9 0.49 D 351 0,44 D Henry NB Left -Through 37.4 0.62 D .38.4 0.60 D Henry NB Right 31,G 0.03 C 33.0 0.03 C Henry SB Left 39.9 0.75 D 42.1 0.78 D Henry 5B Left -Through -(tight 35.6 0.72 D 35.8 0.72 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (NJ (overall) 20.8 - 1.4 - - Queen Kaahumanu NP Left 11.6 0.26 B 12.0 0.16 B Hualalai EB Left 893.5 2.20 F 1.77.1 0.37 F Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (5) (overall) 5.1 - - 2.3 - - Queen Kaahumaru SES Left 12.5 0.15 B 11.4 0.11 B Hualalai WB Left 133.6 0.28 F 187.7 0.47 F Hualalai WB Right 55.7 0.74 F 241 1 0.30 C 40 Royal Vistas SSFM Inremational Table 211: Future 2029 Without Project Intersection Levei of Service (continued) Intersection AM PM Delay (s) v/c LOS Delay (s) v/c LiJS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Puapuaanui St (overall) 10.9 - 11.3 - 13 Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 62.3 07.74 E 55.9 0.82 E Queen Kaahumanu WE Through 3,9 0.55 A 3.6 0.63 A Puapuaanul WB Left 54.9 07:75 D 56.5 0.55 E Puapuaanul WB light 9.9 0.72 A n 'C.6 0.70 B Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kuakini Hwy (overall) 16.1 - 4.3 - - Queen Kaahurnanu NB Left 25.0 0.79 C 13,5 0.40 B Kuakini EB Left 2938.5 2.87 F 429.8 0.79 F Queen Kaahumanu Hwy& Lako St (overall) Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 43.7 15.5 - 0.14 D B 25.7 - 17.4 0.21 B Queen Kaahumanu NB Through 51.3 0.99 D 2.5.1 0.85 C Queen Kaahumanu 5B Left 56.6 0.87 E 21.0 0.67 C Queen Kaahumanu SB Through 23.7 0.77 C 2.9.5 0.92 C Laky EB Left 67.3 0.91 E 44.7 D.78 D Lako EB Th rough -Right 34.2 01.16 C 35.7 0.17 D Lako W9 Left 513 0.65 D 46.3 0.65 D Lako WB Through -Right 45.5 0.34 D 41,5 0.40 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kam III Rid (overall) 18.8 - a 24.7 - C Queen KaahumanO NB Left 42.7 0.79 D 48,8 0.78 D Queen Kaahumanu NB Through 14.3 0.62 B 20.0 0.69 C Queen Kaahumanu SH Left 42.5 0.47 D 46.5 0.50 D Queen Kaahumanu SBThrough 11.3 0.30 B 1.5.7 D.39 B Karneharnelia E8 Left -Through 32.0 0.75 C 37.5 0.85 D Kamehameha WB Left -Through -Right 42.8 01.69 D 46.8 0.64 D 2. Future 2029 With Project Intersection LOS The 2029 With Project intersection and mDvernent LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours. 1. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Palani Road. Overall Intersection LOS= C/C (AM/PM) All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Palani RDad resulted in appropriate LCIS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. 2.. Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Henry Street. Overall Intersection LOS - C/D (AM/PM) The westbound left turn operates at LOS E during the Ph1! peak hour. The overall delay and LDS have gradually gotten worse due tothe increase in background volume and the trip generated by Royal Vistas, The westbound left during the PM peak hour has a volume of 85 vehicles. This volume will clear the intersection in 1 cycle. The delay increases from 53.8 seconds without the project, to 57 seconds with the project. The Royal Vistas traffic volume causes a slight inCrease in 41 Royal Vistas SSFM Internartional the overall delay, Other factors that increase the delay are the increase in background volume and the split phase. All other movements at the signalized intersections of Clueen Kaahumanu Highway with Henry Street resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. 3, Queers Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Street (north), eastbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 2.93 and 0.45 respectively) and long delays during tooth AM and PM peak hours are duce to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PVI peak hours. 4. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Load (South) At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Raad (south), westbound left turning movement has LOS F (►v/c of 0.35 and 0.57 respectively) and long delays during both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes an Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The westbound right turn also operates at LCIS F (v/c of 0.86) during the AM {weak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 5. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street. Overall Intersection LOS = B/B (ANI/PM) The southbound left turn operates at LOS E during the AM and PM peak hour. The westbound left turn operates at LOS E during the FM peak hour. These delays are due to the cycle length. The left turn volumes are IoW and should clear every cycle. . Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Loyal V+star Roadway At the proposed unsignalized intersection of (ween Kaahumanu Highway and the Royal Vistas Roadway, the southbound leftturn movement from Queen Kaahumanu Highway into Royal Vistas Roadway functions well, with minimal delay, an average of 12 to 13 seconds during bath peak hours. The westbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 01.53 and 0.48 respectively) during bath AM (29 vehicles) and PM (12 vehicles) peak hours due to high through volumes an Queen Kaahumanu Highway. Phase 2 left turas exiting Royal Vistas are expected to use Lako Street to access Queen kaahumanu Highway, The intersection functions acceptably, with an average of 3.1 seconds of delay per vehicle in the AM peak hour and 2.3 seconds of delay per vehicle in the PM peak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakin! Highway At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway With Kuakinl Highway, eastbound left turning movement has LCIS F (v/c of 0,89 during the PIVI peak hour) and long delays during both AM and PM peak hour are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahurnanu Highway. The major and Cather minar movements operated at acceptable} levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours_ B, Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Lakya Street, Overall intersection LOS = D/C (AM/PM) At the signalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Lako Street, eastbound left operates at LOS F (Vic of 0.96) during the AN4 peak hour. The westbound left operates at LCIS E during the AM peak hour. The eastbound left and westbound left operate at LCIS E during the PM peak hour. This delay is attributed to the high volume and the split phasing for the Lako Street 42 Royal Vistas 55FM International approaches. All other movements at Lako Street operate at LOS D or better during bath peak hours, 9, Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kameharneha III Road. Overall Intersection LOS = C The westbound approach operates at LOS E duringthe AM peak hour. During the PM peals hour, the westbound approach, the nLrthijOUrld left, arra the southbound left operate at LCIS E. All other movements during hath peak hours operate at LOS D or letter. Tables 21 and 22 show the expected vehicular delay and level of service at each intersections. The shaded row indicates the overall intersection delay, 5ynchro output is in Appendix G. Table 21: f=uture 2029 With Project Intersection Level of Service Intersection AM PM Delay (s) v/c LO5 Delay ts) v/c LOS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Palani Rd (overall) 24.8 - C 2.8.+4 - C Queen Kaahumanu ER Left 39,5 0,49 D 40.8 0,77 D Queen Kaahumanu EB Through 15,7 0.35 3 21..2 0.67 ---------. C Queen Kaahumanu WB Left 39.7 0.69 D 41.8 (1.75 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 16.1 0.50 B 18.8 0.4€3 B Palani NB Left 383 0.74 D 42.0 4.75 D Palani N8 Through 25.5 0.26 C 29.0 0,43 C Palani 58 Lift 48.5 0,51 D 51.8 4.74 L) Palani 5B Through 34.2 0,67 C 343.0 0,64 C Queers Kaahumanu Hwy & Henry St (overall) 34.7 0.10 C 35.9 0.73 D --- Queen Kaahumanu EB Left 48.0 058 D 53.1 0.74 D Queen Kaahumanu EB Through 27.5 0.41 C 32.4 0.69 C Queen Kaahumanu EB Right 24.0 0.09 C 25.1 0,21 C ( ueen Kaahumanu WB Left 47.7 0.45 D 57.0 4.64 E Queen Kaahurnanu WB Through 36.7 0.75 D 35.5 0.58 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Right 29,9 0.37 C 29.0 0,24 C Henry NB Left Henry NB Left -Through 36.1 37.5 0.49 D 0162 1) 37.0 35.8 0.40 0,5D D D +Ienry NB Flight 3L7 0,03 C 33.3 0.03 C Henry SB Left 39.9 0.75 D 42-4 0.75 D Henry SB Left -Through -Right 35,7 0,73 D 32.0 0,73 D Queen Kaahurns nu. Hwy & Huallalall (N) (overall) 2.8.5 - - 1.6 - - Uueen Kaahumanu NB Left 12-0 0,29 8 12,7 0. is B Hualalai EB Left 1310.5 2.93 1 E .37,0 (1,45 F 43 Royal Vistas 55FM International Table 2Z: Future 2629 With Project Intersection Level of Service (continued) Intersectiun AM I PM Delay (5) vfc LOS aelayIs) vfc LOS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (S) (overall) 6.8 - - 2.7 - - Queen Kaahurnanu 59 left 13,4 0.17 B 11.9 0.12 B Hualalai WB Left 173.5 0.3.5 F 251,0 0.57 F Hu71r11ai WB Right 83.5 0,85 F 26.7 0.33 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Puap uaanu1 St (overall) Queen Kaahurnanu SB Left 12.6 78.0 - a 0,78 E 1215 59.0 - B 0.84 E Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 3.9 0.55 A 3.8 0.67 A Puapuaanui WB Left 65.9 0.80 D 72,2 0,74 F Puapuaanui W5 Right 11,4 0.77 B 11.1 D.72 B Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kone ViSta R (overall) 3.1 - - 2.3 - - Queen Kaahurnanu SB Left 10.4 0.04 B 11.7 0.14 B Kona Vista WB Left 118.2 0.53 F 228,2 0.48 F Kona Vista WB Right 24,9 0.40 C 25,2 0.29 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kuakini Hw (overall) 21.8 - - 4.6 - - QU;_C' I{aahurnanu NB Left 27.4 0.82 D 133 0.40 B Ku; viii EB Left - F 5075 0,89 F Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy & Lako St (overall) 43.4 - D 28.0 - C Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 1.5,6 0.13 B 17.7 0.18 B Queen Kaahumanu N8 Through 42.8 0.94 D 23.9 0.82 C Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 50.2 0.84 D 13.9 0,68 C Queen Kaahurnanu 5B Through 2.3,8 0.74 C 24,1 0.85 C Lako ES Left 88,4 0.96 F 60.4 0.83 E Lako EB Through -Right 41.9 0,17 D 45.7 0.17 D Lako WB Left 62.1 0.75 E 593 0.71 E Lako WB Through -Right 53.6 0.33 D 52.7 DA! D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kam III Rd (overall) 20,8 - C 27.9 - C Queen Kaahurnanu NB Left 52.9 0.79 D 57.3 0,78 E Queen Kaahumanu N8 Through 12,6 u.55 B 21.4 0.67 C Queen Kaahurnanu SB Left 54,6 0.50 D _ 57.0 0,52 E Queen Kaohumanu SB Through 11.D 0.27 B 16.7 0.36 8 Kamehameha ES Left -Through 4 3. 3 0.79 D 45.9 0,88 D Kamehameha WB Left Through -Hight 61. ': 0.79 F 501 0.71 E 1`deiay exceeds 1,000 seconds per vehicle 3. 2029 Traffic Signal Warrant Peak -Hour volume traffic signal warrants were evaluated for the 2029 with and without project scenarios. Table 23 shows the Leak -Hour warrant analysis in 2029 with and without the project. Traffic Signal Warrant analysis can be found in Appendix J. 44 Royal Vistas SSFM International 1, Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warrant in the AM and PM peak hour with and without the project, 2, Queen Kaahurnanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warra nt in the AM peak hour with and without the proiect. 3. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warrant in the AM and PM peak hour with and without the project. Table 23: 2029 Peak -Hour WM1farrant 2029 Without Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant? Hualalai (N) 857 181 YES 1110 93 YES Hualalai (S) 1111 81 YES 1038 67 NO Kuakinl 885 571 YES 980 1 268 YES 2029 With Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant? Hualalai (N) 876 196 YES 1181 98 YES Hualalai (5) 1216 81 YES 1103 67 ................ NO Kuakini 810 579 YES 980 1 271 YES 4. 2029 With Project Segment LOS Arterial LOS was analyzed in Synr.hro on Queen Kaahurnanu Highway from Hualalai (north) to Lako Street. Where signalized intersections are less than 2.0 mi apart, thefacility should be classified as an urban street and analyzed with the methodologies of Urban Street Facilities_ For Urban Street F=acilities, through - vehicle travel speed is used to analyze vehicular LOS. Analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix G. The arterial LOS can be found in Table 24, This segment of Queen Kaahurnaniu Highway operates at LOS C in northbound direction and LOS B in the southbound direction during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively, satisfying the County of Hawaii Chapter 25 (Zoning), Article 2 (Administration and Enforcement), Division 4 (Amendments), Section 46 (Concurrency Requirements) regarding "acceptable level of service" for transportation facilities. Table 24: 2029 with Project Segment LOS 45 Northbound sout­lhn i nd Speed (rnph) LOS Speed (mph) LOS AM Peak Hour 18.6 C 25.2 B PM Peak Hour 20.4 C 24.5 B 45 Royal Vistas SSFM Intemational V. Lary -Term (2039) A. Surrounding Area Conditions No other significant developments or future: construction projects are expected in the surrounding area that would significantly affect the roadway geometrics or traffic volumes at the study intersections. This is based on research completed on October 14, 2019 at the State of Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control (OEQC) website and the Statewide Transportation Improvements Program {STIP). B. Volumes 1. Future 2039 Without Project Volumes The project study area within Kana has been experiencing modest growth. HDOT ADT counts on Queen ICaahurnanu Highway between Nani Kailua Drive and Hualalai Road didn't shrew any increase in vehicular volumes from 2015 to 2016. However, the 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Plan forecasts average daily traffic in Kona an Hawaii Belt Road to be 41,900 vehicles in 2020 and 48,000 vehicles in 2035. This is approximately equal to a 1% annual growth rate over 15 years in the Kana area. Since there is a sccphe far development and to acknowledge all other projects which are in planning stage, a background growth rate of 1% per year was assumed, to account for additional traffic at the study intersections. The estimated future volumes without the project for the future year, 2039 are shown in Figure 15. 2. Project Related Volumes Phase 1 and Phase 2 will be completed key 24 24 and 2029, respectively. The trips generated and distributed by Phase i and Phase 2 will not change - 3. Future 2039 with Project volumes Project related trips from Phase I jFigure 9) and Phase 2 (Figure 13 and figure 14) were added to the Future 2039 Without Project volumes (Figure 16)to estimate Future 2039 With Project peak hour volumes {see Figure I7), 46 Royal Vistas ON E 15 ro C5 =, R en tv `� 28 (50) � ry �.� 827 (7431 159 (272) �-• r 8 T ( 317} 558 (1070) —`—F Tr 266 (614) Palani Fick Queen Kaahumanu Hwy i rw —IN 1 9— M t2 N 171 (s7) --11(17) Tr ..: t� �g� Queen Kaahumanu Hwy C CL eo SSFM International Henry Sc L c v 53 (383) 732 6691 63 8) r� �—r 131 (232) / 43$(8091 t 151 (355) HenrySt V Quem Kaahumanu Hwy rW m 9 (15) 206 (45 4) �r a Ul n 306 l L55) 59 (37) 84 (59) L E� 152 (354) 6 (13) Legend Peak Hrsur Vclurnes it AM (PIV) 5ignalixed {veh/hrl '`✓ Intersedion 32 (63) .326 (235) #--" (48) 84(715) � w � 1$ 12�} +-15 (13) P Queen Kaahum nu Hwy I North @ Unsignalized Stop 51gr, Intersection Figure 16: Future 2039 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 47 Royal Vistas SSFM International Palani Rd Henry St A w� 371581 �y •. � 5U8 iAU3) M } --- _ 555 x671 J � �`� 780 1744h N o rt h t �w, 67 M4 QU+C'@i1 T 3e 37 OlTj 13l i C 555 11,104) ' +471850zi 26616141 t *- 151 (358) C .� +- Pallarli Rd � � y Henry St u To Royal Vistas Roadway Hualalai Rd (Worth) 5-4 �: L t 60 iii r� At C 206 1=541 - i" 100 1931 } S 331I76dP �� � 59 8371—....-..f 84 1551 �r t 5 ' 3& 1231 —_ 4--151ilw _ i�9 4cal J Ip !� 493 (3731 E 37 M) C* Queen Kaahumanu H i hv.,ay To Kuakini Highway 1pend #� @aa� i� lr �'� : :' , Signalized Unsignalized _.:_-�.— � � �� �.. 51 o p 'Sign AM IPMi (ver)/riq — Inkef�eCtion Intersection Figure 17; Future 2039 With Project Peak Hour Vol urnes 48 Royal Vistas SSFM Intemartronal C. Future 2039 Intersection Traffic Operation Analysis 1. Future 2039 Without Project Intersection LOS 1. The 2039 Without Project intersection and movement LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined I:or the AM and PM peak hours. NOTE: 2039 Future projections assume 1% annual growth rate for 20 years, which is a conservative assumption. Tables 25 and 26 shove the existing vehicular delay and level of service at each intersection. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Palani Road. Overall Intersection LOS:; C/C, The PM southbound left turn operates at LOS E. At 62 vehicies in the PM peak hour., this results in about 1 vehicle per minute. This movement should clear eatery cycle. The increase in delay is based on the increase of the background traffic volume. 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and henry Street. Overall Intersection LOS = D/D. The PM eastbound and westbound left turns operate at LOS E. The overall delay and LCIS have gradually gotten worse due to the increase In background growth rate. The increase in delay is lased on the increase in background volumes. 3. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) At the unsignalized intersection of queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Street (north), the delay at this intersection is 41 seconds per vehicle. This is due to the nigh relay in the eastbound left turn volume. The eastbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 0.59 during the PM peak hour) and long delays during Moth AM and Phil peak hours are due to high through volurnes on Queen Kaahurnanu Highway. The major and other minter movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 4. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Read (south), westbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c cf 0.46 and 0.76 respectively) and long delays during both AM and PM peak hours are roue to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The westbound right turn also operates at LOS F (v/c of 0.97) during the AM peak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 5. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street. Overall Intersection LOS = B/B, The southbound left turas operate at LOS E during both peak hours. The westbound left turn operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour. These delays are due to the cycle length. 1`he Icft tum volumes are low and should clear every cycle. 6. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway w[th Kuakini Highway, eastbound left turning movement has LQS F and long delays during the AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The, major and Qther minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak; hours, 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Lako Street. Overall Intersection LOS = E/D. At the signalized intersection of queen Kaahumanu Highway with Lako Street, the eastbound left turn, northbound through, and southbound left turn apurate at LOS F (v/c of 1.01, 1.1, and 0.99 49 Royal Vistas SSFM Internartional respectively). The PM southbound through operates at L05 F (v/c of 1.03). The delay increase is caused by the volumes generated by the background volume and the split phasing. S. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kamehameha III Road. Overall Intersection LOS = C/B, All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kamehameha III Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours_ Tables 25 and 26 show the expected vehicular delay and level of service at each intersection. The shaded row indicates the overall intersection delay. Synchr© output is in Appendix G. Table 25: Future 2039 Without Project Intersection. Level of Service Intersection AM PM [delay (s) v/c LOS Delay (s) v/c LOS Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy & Palani Rd (overall) 26.3 - C 31.1 - C Queen Kaahumanu FS Left 41,4 0.53 D 44.2 0.80 f:) Queen Kaahumanu ES Through 17.7 0.40 B 24,6 0.74 Queen Kaahumanu WB Left 411.8 0.71 D 45.3 0.78 F) Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 17.9 0.54 B 21.1. 0.54 Palani N8 Left 39.7 0.77 D 45.8 0.78 D Palani NB Through 25.3 0.27 C 29.2 0.44 C Palani S8 Left 419.6 0.53 D 55.2 0.78 E Palani 5r3 Through 34.6 0.69 C 35.1 0.67 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Henry St (overall) 37.5 0.74 D 38.9 0.78 D Ur_e(-,n Kaahumanu E8 Left 53.9 0.67 D 65.5 0.84 E Queen Kaahumanu E13 Through 29.9 0.46 C 35.6 0.74 D Queen Kaahumanu EB Bight 25.7 0.10 C 26.8 0.23 C Queen Kaahumanu WS Left 50.0 0.49 D 62.2 0.69 Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 40.8 0.80 D 39.0 0.73 D Queen Kaahurnavu W8 Flight 32.7 0.42 C 30.6 0.25 C__. Henry IVB Left 37.2 0.52 D 37.6 0.46 D Henry NB Left -Through 38.9 0.65 D 39.9 0.64 D Henry NB Right 32.2" 0.04 C 33,4 0.D3 C. Henry 5B Left 43.4 0.79 D 46.0 0.82 D Henry SB Left -Through -Right 37.3 077 D37.8 0.77 D 4ueen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (N) (overall)- Quer4n Kaahumanu NB Left 12.7 0,32 B 1-13--l___ --- 0.19 B Hualalai F5 Loft * F 316.3 D.59 F Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (5) (overall) 9.2 - - 3.7 - - Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 13.7 0.19 B 1.2.3 0,13 R Hualalai WS Left 229.1 0.46 F 345.7 0.76 F Hualalai WB Right 109.5 C.97 F .30.3 0.39 D 'delay exceeds 1,000 seconds per vehicle 50 Royal Vistas SSFM Inremational Table 26: Future 2039 Without Project Intersection Level of Service tcontinuedj Intersection AM PM Delay (s) v/c LOS Delay (s) v/c LiJS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Puapuaanui St (overall) 13.0 - 13 1-3.3 - B Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 64.1 0.78 E 58,4 0.83 E Queen Kaahumanu WE Through; 4.8 0.62 A I 4.6 0.70 A D _ /.1 O -C>7 E Puapuaanul WB Left 54.5 0.79 Puapuaanul WB Right 13.0 0.84 F. -3 � C.79 B Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kuakini Hwy (overall) 11.3 - 8.6 - - Queen Kaahurnanu NB Left 46.0 0.95 S 0.48 C Kuakini EB Left " - Queen IKaahurnanu HWV & Lako St (overall) 64.6 - E 48.8 - D Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 18.2 0.19 B 22.5 0.32 C Queen Kaahumanu NBThrough 55.1 1.10 F 44.8 0.95 D Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 93.0 0.99 F 57.0 0.90 E Queen Kaahumanu SB Through 29.4 0..85 C 52,9 1.03 F Laky EB Left 92.7 1.01 F 46.1 D.80 D Lakya EB Th rough -Right 34.5 07 19 C 36.5 0.18 D Lako W8 Left 51.5 0.70 D 471 0.67 D Lako WB Through -Right 45.3 0.35 D 42.9 0.41 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Karn III Rd (overall) 20.4 - C 28.3 - B Queen KaahumanO NB Left 42.0 0.79 D 51.D 0,78 D Queen Kaahumanu NB Through 17.0 0.70 B 25.7 038 C Queen Kaahumanu SH Left 42.6 0.48 D 47.9 0.51 D [ween Kaahumanu SBThrough 12.6 0.35 B 17,8 0.44 B Kamehamelia ES Left -Through 32.1 0.76 C 41.9 0.88 D Kamehameha WB Left -Through -Right 44.7 0.73 D 49.3 0.68 D *delay exceeds 1,000 seconds per vehicle 2. Future 2039 With Project Intersection LLS Existing intersection and movement LOS and average delay (in seconds per vehicle) were determined for the AM and PM peak hours. 1. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Palani Road Overall Intersectican LOS= C/C. Alf movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Karnehameha Ili Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Henry Street. Overall Intersection LOS = Q/D. All movements at the signalized intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kamehameha III Road resulted in appropriate LOS Imo or better during AM and PM peak hours. 51 Royal Vistas SSFM !nternatronal 3. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Haalalai Road (North) At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highwav with Hualalai Street (north), the delay at this intersection is 50.6 seconds per vehicle, a slight increase from the 2039 Without Project scenario. The eastbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 0.73 in the PM peak. hour) and long delays during both AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours, 4 Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Hualalai Road (south), westbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 0.56 and 0.97 respectively) and long delays during bath AM and PM peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The westbound right turn also operates at LOS F (v/c of 1.14) during the AM peak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the Ai1fl and PM peak hours. 5. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street. Overall Intersection LLS= 6/3. The southbound left turns operate at LCIS F (v/c of 0.78 and 01.87, respectively) during the AM and PM peak hours. The westbound left turn operates at LDS F (v/c of 0,77) during the PM peak hour. These delays are due to the cycle length. The left turn volumes are low and should clear every cycle. 6, Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Royal Vistas Roadway At the proposed unsignalized intersection of Uueen Kaahumanu Highway and the Loyal Vistas Roadway, the southbound left turn movement from Queen Kaahumanu Highway into Royal Vistas Roadway functions well, with minimal delay, an average of 11 to 13 seconds during bath peak hours. The westbound left turning movement has LOS F (v/c of 0.70 and 01.69 respectively) during both AM (29 vehicles) and PM (12 vehicles) peak hours are due to high through volumes on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. Phase 2 left turns exiting Royal Vistas are expected to use Lako Street to access Queen Kaahumanu Highway, The intersection functions acceptably, with an average of 4.1 seconds of delay per vehicle in the AM peak hour and 2.9 seconds of delay per vehicle in the Phil peak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway At the unsignalized intersection of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kuakini Highway, the eastbound left turning movement has LOS F during the AM and PM peak hours. The northbound left turn operates at LDS F (v/c 0.98) during the AM freak hour. The major and other minor movements operated at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. S. Queen Kaahumanu Highway ancf Lako Street, Overall Intersection LOS = E/D. The overall intersection operates at LOS E during the AM peak hour and LDS D during the PM peak hour. The delay is dueto the increase in background volume, the traffic generated by Royal Vistas, and the split phasing. During the AM peak hour, the eastbound left turn, northbound through, and southbound left turn operate at LDS F (v/c of 1.04, 1.05, and 1.11 respectively), The PM eastbound left turn operates at LCIS F (v/c of 0.87). 9. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kamehameha III Road. Overall Intersection LOS = C/C.. 52 Royal Vistas 55FM In ternotronal All movements at the signalised intersections of Queen Kaahumanu Highway with Kamehameha Ill Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or better during AM and PM peals hours, Tables 27 and 28 show the expected vehicular delay and level of service at each intersection_ The shaded row indicates the overall intersection delay. 5ynchro output i5 in Appendix I. Table 27; Future 2039 With project Intersection Level of Service Intersection AM PM Delay (s) vfc LOS Delay (s) VJt LOS Queen Kaahumanu "m & balani Fid (overall) Queen Kaahumanu EB Left 26.3 41.4 - 0.53 C D 31.3 44.3 - 4,80 C D Queen Kaahumanu EB Through 17.8 0.41 B 25.4 0.77 C Queen Kaahumanu WE Left 40.8 0,71 D 45.5 0.78 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 18.3 0,56 B 21.4 0,55 C Palani NB Left 39.7 0.77 D 45.8 0.78 D Palani NB Through 25.3 0.27 C 29.3 0.44 C Palani SB Left. 49.6 0,53 D 54.7 0.77 D Palani SB Through 34.5 0.09 C 35.1 4.57 . D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Henry St (overe11) 38.6 0.76 D 40.2 0.80 D Queen Kaahumanu EB Lett 53.0 0,67 D 64.6 0,84 E �.:tueen Kaahumanu EB Through 30_2 0.47 C 41.4 0.84 1) Uueen Kaahumanu EB Right 25.5 0.10 C 28,1 0.23 C Queen Kaahumanu WB Left 50.5 0.51 D 51.3 0.66 D Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 44.3 0,85 d 42.4 0.8D D Clueen Kaahumanu WB Right 35,0 0.51 D 31.4 0,26 C. Henry NB Left 37.2 0.52 ❑ 37.3 01.46 D Henry NB Left -Through 38.9 0,65 ❑ 39.6 0.63 D Henry NB Right 32.2 0.04 C 33.2 0.43 C Henry SB Left 43.4 0,79 D 44.6 0.82 D Henry 5B Left -Through -Right 38.0 0.78 D 37.2 0.77 D Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (N) (overall) 50.6 - - 2.5 . Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 13.2 0.35 B 13.9 0.21 B Hualalai EB Left - F 425.9 0.73 F Queer~ Kaahumanu Hwy & Hualalai (5) (overall) 13.1 - - 4.6 - Queen Kaahumanu SB Left Hualalai WB Left 1.4,5 3018.5 0,21 0,56 B F 12.8 495.2 0.14 0.97 B F Hualalai W2 Right 168.4 1.14 F 34.3 0.43 D *delay exceeds 1,000 seconds per vehicle 53 Royal Vistas 55FM International 'table 28: Future 2039 With Project Intersection Level of Service (continued) Intersection AM PIIS � Delay (sj vfC LDS Delay (s) v/c J LOS Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Puapuaanui St (overall} 15.7 - B 15.3 - B Queen Kaahumanu S6 Left 91.4 0.78 F 82") 0.87 F Queen Kaahumanu WB Through 4.9 4.62 A 4.6 0.72 A Puapuaanui WB Left 65.6 0.81 E 843 0.77 F Puapuaanui WS Right 16.1 0.85 B 0.78 9. Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Hona Vista Rdwy (overall) 4.1 - - 2.9 - - Queen Kaahumanu 5B Left 10.9 0.04 B 12.5 0.15 ` Kana Vista WB Left 1.90.1 0.70 F 375,9 0.69 Kon,- Vi5ti WB Right 30,1 0.46 D 29,9 :. F. Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kuakini Hwy (overall) 12.7 - - 9.3 I 15.1 0.49 C Queen Kaahumanu N8 Left 57.8 0.93 I F Kuakini EB Left # - F Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Lako 5t (overall) 65.7 - E 37.Q - D Queers Kaahumanu NB Left 20.1 0.19 C 25.9 0.26 C Queen Kaahumanu NO Through 72.4 1.0s F 29.0 0.85 C Queen Kaahumanu SB Left 141-3 1.,11 F 45.1 0,87 D Queen Kaahumanu 58 Through 29.2 0.83 C 30.6 0.91 C tako EB Left 109.6 1.04 F 85.9 0.87 F I_ako EB Through -Right 42,1 0.19 D 55,7 D.1:: PLalcv WB Left 62.3 0.76 E 73.0 0.75 E Lako WB Thr€iugh-Right 53.6 0.34 D 64.5 0.44 E Queen Kaahumanu Hwy & Kam III Rd (overall) 22.5 - C 33.1 - C Queen Kaahumanu NB Left 53.6 0.90 L 66.8 0.79 E Queen KaahUrnat7u NB Through 14.4 0.61 B 25.8 D.71 C Queen Kaahurnanu 513 Left 55.9 0,51 E 67.8 0-56 E Queen Kaahumanu SB Through 12.4 0.31 B 19.8 0.39 B Orneharreha EES Left -Through 44.4 0.81 D 53.5 0.90 D Kamehameha WB Left -Through -Right 64.4 0.78 E 73.2 0.77 E *delay exceeds 1,0140 seconds per vehicle 3. 2039 Traffic Signal Warrant Table 29 shows the Peak -Hour warrant analysis in 2039 with and without the project. The Traffic Signal Warrant analysis can be found in Appendix J. 1. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualaiai Road (North) This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warrant in the AM and PM peak hour with and without the project. 54 Royal Vistas SSFM Inrernartionai 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warrant in the ANE peak hour with and without the project. 3. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway This intersection passes the Peak -Hour warrant in the AM and PM peak hour with and without the project, Table 29: 2039 Peak -Hour Warrant 2039 Without Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant Hualalai (fe) 947 200 YES 1225 102 YES Hualalai (S) 1229 89 YES 1147 74 N0 Kuakini 1 994 531 J YES- 1082 J 297 YES 2039 With Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant? Hualalai (N) 965 215 YES 1297 107 YES Hualalai (5) 1333 89 YES 1212 74 NO Kuakini 1 894 J 539 1 YES 1082 1 300 YES 4. 2039 With Project Segment LOS Arterial LOS was analyzed in Synchro on Queen Kaahumanu Highway frorn Hualalai (north) to Lako Street. Where signalized intersections are lessthan 2.0 mi apart, thefacility should be classified as an urban street and analyzed with the methodologies of Urban Street Facilities, For Urban Street Facilities, through - vehicle travel speed is used to analyze vehicular LDS. Analysis worksheets can be found in Appendix i. The arterial LOS can be found in Table 30. This segment of Queen Kaahumanu Highway operates at LOS 0 in the northbound direction and LOS B in the southbound direction in the ANE peak hour. Duririg the PM peak hour, both directions operate at. LOS C. The arterial LOS for the AM and PM peak hours satisfies the County of Hawaii Chapter 25 (Zoning), Article 2 (Administration and Enforcement), Division 4 (Amendments), Section 46 (Concurrency Requirements) regarding "acceptable level of service" for transportation facilities. Table 34: 2039 with Project Segment LOS 55 Northbound Southbound Speed (mph) LOS Speed (mph) LOS AM Peak Hour 15.6 a 24.2 B PM Peak Baur 1$.6 C 23.6 C 55 Roycr! Vistas SSFM Inrernartional VI. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS The Federal -Aid Highways 2035 Trarrsport&ion Plan for the District of Hawaii (July 2014) Includes improvements to Kuakini Highway from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road, Kuakini Highway will be widened by 2 travel lanes and include bicycle facilities and sidewalks. This project Would have a significant. impact on traffic operations. She installation of bike facilities and }pedestrian facilities may lead to an increase in bicycle and pedestrian traffic, in which case bicycle and pedestrian safety will need to be further analyzed. Due to the difficulty of crossing a 4 -lane roadway with a pasted speed limit of 45 F'w+1PH, stop -controlled intersections may need to be signalized or converted to roundabouts.. Based on the existing traffic volumes and future projections of Royal Vistas on the surrounding roadways, the fallowing system -wide intersection improvements are recommended for consideration by Hawaii County and HDOT; 1, Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Palani Road Signal timing should be monitored and updated to ensure that left turn queues clear every cycle. 2. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Henry Street Signa I timing should be monitored and updated to ensure that left tura queues clear every cycle. Henry Street approaches currently operate in split phases. Changing the split phasing to protected left turn phases on Henry Street will allow more green time on the major through movements, lowering the overall delay of the intersection. 3. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (North) Based on the 2419 traffic volumes, this intersection passes the Four -Hour warrant. This intersection passed the Peak -Hour warrant in the 2019 AM peak hour and for all peak hours 1n all future scenarios. Future traffic should be monitored, and a traffic, signal or roundabout should be installed if needed, but priority shcsuld be given to keeping Queen Kaahumanu Highway traffic revving and not installing a traffic signal if not warranted by 4- or 8 -hour warrants. The overall delay at this intersection is 41.0 and 50.5 seconds per vehicle in the 2039 AM peals hour, without and with the project, respectively. When the delay experienced by drivers reaches this level, the eastbound drivers are likely to find alternative routes. 4. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Hualalai Road (South) As the westbound left turn delay gets worse, drivers may decide to use Puapuaanui Street to access Queen Kaahumanu Highway in the southbound direction. Based on the existing volumes, this intersection did not pass the Four -Hour warrant or the Peak -Hour warrant. This intersection did pass the Peak -Flour warrant for all future AM peak hour scenarios. Future traffic should be monitored.. 5. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Puapuaanui Street 5igrial timing should be monitored and adjusted as needed to increase the probability that queues on Clueen Kaahumanu Highway can clear the intersection in 1 cycle. 6. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Royal Vistas Roadway This intersection will function acceptably through the full. Phase 1 buildout. Before any Phase 2 residences are cccupled, it is recommended that the connection to Kekuanao'a Place is Completed so that Royal Vistas Phase 2 'left taut' traffic can access the Lako Street traffic signal. 7. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Koakini Highway 56 Royal Vistas SSFM In temational This intersection passes the Four -Hour warrant and Peak -Hour warrants during aII' peak hours for ail scenarios. Future traffic should be monitored, and a traffic signal or roundabout should be installed if needed. The northbound leftturn movement isvery heavy (300-600 veh/hour Fay 2 3 with project), which will be nearly at capacity. The westbound left turn, while small, is already over capacity in 2019 and will be far over capacity by 2039. Royai Vistas traffic has very little effect on this intersection. 8. Queen Kaahumanu Highway and Lako Street The Latero Street intersection operates at LOS E/D (AM/PM) with or without the Royal Vistas project in the 2039 scenario. Lako Street currently has split phasing (sequential rather than concurrent) can the Lako Street approaches, Changingthe phasing from split to protected left turns would help lower the delay. This intersection would also improve significantly if Queen Kaahumanu Highway is widened to 4 lanes as in the 2735 Transportation Plan. 9, QL4een Kaahumanu Highway and Kamehameha III Road Signal timing should be monitored and updated as needed. Arterial LCIS was analyzed in Synchro on Queen Kaahumanu Highway from Huaialai (north) to Lako Street. Where signalized intersections, are less than 7,0 rni apart, the facility should be classified as an urban street and analyzed with the methodologies of Urban Street Facilities, For Urban Street Facilities, through - vehicle travel speed is used to analyze vehicular LOS. This segment of Queen Kaahumanu Highway operates at LOS b or better for each scenario in the AM and PM peak hours. The arterial LOS satisfies the County of Hawaii Chapter 25 (Zoning}, Article 2 (Administration and Lnforcement), Division 4 (Amendments), Section 46 (Concurrency Requirements) regarding "acceptable level of service" for transportation facilities. 57 Royal Vistas VII. REFERENCES SSFM Inremational American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 2011. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation, 10th Edition: An ;TE Informational report, September 2017. Office of Environmental Qua lityControl. FA and EIS Online library, Accessed July 2Q19. chttp://oL-qc.doh.hawaii.gov/default.aspx>. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Federal -Aid Functional Clussificotion Update: Policy and Procedures, December 2012. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, f=ederal -Aid i4ighways 2035 Tronsportgtion Plan for the Di.strirt of Ha woii, July 2014. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Historicof Traffic Station Maps, 2016. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Historical Traffic Station Maps, 2015. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Historicol Traffic Station Maps, 2014. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Historical Troffic 5totion Maps, 2013. State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation. Statewide Transportation Improvements Program, Accessed July 2019. -,httpi//hawaii.gov/dot/highways/5TIP>, State of Hawaii, Department of Tr ansportatiori, Statewide uniform Design Manuof far Streets and Highways, 1980. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council. Highway Capa7cityManuoi, Washington, D.C., 6" Edition. 58 24 -Hour and Peals Period Turn Movement Traffic Counts Type of peak tiour being reported: user -Defined Mekhod for determining peak hour: Total Entering vo .jrre LOCATION: Palani Rd -- Hawaii Beit Rd QC JOB #° 14972601 CM/STATI=: Hawaii, HI DATE: Tue, Apr 30 2Q19 Mo 2B6 Peak -Hager: 7.20 AM -- 8.20 AM LA + iw L ]77 321 Peak 15 -Min; 7,30AAS �- 7.15 AM f + r ; t ; 10% E « WA 43 Si C7 t � ` XG ► 1i8 ti r 763 5&6 V * 1Q61 N""",'r d7 r 7.5 2K3 132 ]L39� 37 0 28 F 702 544 .y , :�A }�. Ly Counts S 2.3 r;,ara 7rin� raJaavEs r:L.�nrmE:s -1 { a L 0 j ti 0 0'1 !3 1 .W. L r# L hua . � ran ria -► r r ItNAr N., ru � � 4 r 15r -Min gaunt Period Palani Rd Northbound Palani fid Southbewnd Hawaii Belt Rd Eastbound Hawali Belt Rd Westbound Total Hourly otals L�ePt Thr u Right kJ I_41Ik Thru Ri hJ 1J Lr:fi Thry fti hd LJ Q.twfl Tl1ru JI';i l71 U Beginning AtI 6:45 AM 7:00 AM 48 1E 29 5'- 35 26 1 5 57 29 55 17 w' 0 L7 L1 76 3_ U 91 38 4 48 36 L75 1 0 L79 3 0 535 548 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 5s 39 27 54 51 26 D 4 8 78 33 91 38 1 0 20 13 122 38 0 131 58 D 4` 40 L57 0 163 11 0 62 684 2379 7:45 AM 8:OG AM 63 55 29 68 39 29 0 0 1 7 80 49 70 Si 0 0 23 12 102 59 0 171 53 0 45 44 L44 7 0 184 3 0 8:15 AM 8,WAM 58 34 27 55 4s i5 0 Q 5 a 6' 29 6"9 78 0 0 22 25 129 5_ 0 1�6 1`5 0 38 61 223 5 0 1H7' 4 11 ILE PSE 15=MIn FIDWrates Northbound Southbound Emabound Westbound T° taj Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left 'Thru Right U Left Thru Right U AllVehldes Heavy Trucks 2i6 204 104 8 0 0 0 32 0 364 152 8 G 0 52 4 524 232 0 52 28 1.60 0 652 44 % 28 0 2736 128 Pedestrians Dkydes 0 0 {3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 8aiiroad St ed Buses Cc+axrmr,71�: Report generated on 5/13/2019 3;10 PM SOURCE; Q,4ality Counts, LLC 1.877-58042212 Paqe 1 o' I Type of peak ttour being reported: User-Defineri Method fordeterminlni; peak hour: Total Entering vo .jrre LOCATION: Palani Rd -- Hawaii Belt Rd QC JOB #° 14972602 CTTY/STATIL: Hawaii, HI 9Alt;: Tue, Apr 30 2Q19 see Peak -Hour: 3:45 PM -- 4.45 PM is 17 L Peak 15 -Min: 3:45 Plat — 4:00 ISM I f + { t 1 ; 9l� « 260 t i 41 « 873 As .. 71 i i 2A — iii WR .9 [WWI « W9 26 y `°, W aA 18-0a n SM % t 23 r 117.5 1.1 w 1 i t R9 r 2 Z �f 2i Z1F L}7 *2 7I? Quality County 3 113 t1 4 L ` 1 t NA w < W, NA w � « IV. rvn HA F 4 � 15 -Min Count PeTiod Palani Rd Norrhbound Palani Rd Southbmmcl Hawaii Belt Rd Eastbound Hawaii Belt Rd Westbuurrd Total burly ToraJs Lert I•tr,< Riehl tl belt Thru Ri ht ;P It -fl Thru RIO U 1_14f1 lbru I{:kri! t1 "iuningAt 3.00 PM Eo _0 102 35 1 :kl9 93 t L84 :3 0 937 a. 15 PM 56 76 0 t3 84 29 C -16 175 1i5 1 55 L56 3 0 375 3:30 PM 3:45 PMA 77 6L 59 55 $2 65 0 0 ' S 2_ 94 27 93 29 0 0 53 55 193, 11.1 d 199 131 1 52 L58 4 0 154 11 0 947 951 3670 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 52 57 48 73 69 61 1 0 9 12 74 27 79 32 0 0 So 60 227 129 0 213 134 0 56 S5 172 9 0 1.38 6 ❑ 941 933 3674 3732 4:30 PM 16 75 73 0 9 67 19 0 63 239 109 1 55 L45 15 0 9'-6 3741 4:4S PM 59 11 63 L7 16 94 17 iS 64 I7+, 1.23 D 52 1:4 i7 4 881 j677 5-00 PM 57 79 57 1 1' 69 35 0 63 22S 1t' 2 47 L5S 3 932 3668 S-15 PMA 64 68 6K 0 A 9'. 1.1 0 66 :"6 tL10 G1 L42 8 0 883 3618 3:30 PM 47 75 55 0 3 6G 19 0 46 i66 94 0 57 L20 8 0 756 3458 5:45 PM 5'_ 8$ 54 0 7 59 13 0 3S iG.1 G9 i 4- LO'- 9 0 69_ 3262 Peak 15 -Min Norrhhaund Southbound fatrb wnd Wesrhound Flowrates ht lotal Luft Thru Right U Left Thru Ri: U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U ti1e ices HgavyTruck& 720 378 260 '6 0 4 ❑ 94 0 377 .16 S r i] 270 12 z S24 4 20 8 224 4 6163 44 d 8 177 Ped'L'sLmins 0 1 4 4 12 BFtyeles � t] f) ❑ tl o c L1 0 A A Q R ❑ ia,lroarl 5t ed Ruses �c�mmenfs: Report generated on 5/13/2019 3:06 PM SOURCE: Qkwlity Courtts, LLC (http:lfwww.qualitWvvnts,net} 1.877.580.2212 Page 10 1 Type of peak trour being reported: User -Defined Method for determin I n�, peak hour: ToteI Entering vo',jrre LOCATION: henry St -• Hawaii Belt Rd QC JOB #' 14972603 CTTV/51AFE: Hawaii, HI 7A1t;: Tue, Apr 30 2Q19 azs a1z Peak -Halms: 7:20 AM -- 8.20 AM �+ r ' Peak 15 -Min: 8:15 AAS -- 8:30 AM L 4 `.L � �J * 87x0 — 107 j x *7 . MI) SS . m j 1.2h w 4S sw r lm % 1, 52 * 75x 7 46 i r 59 + ry7 r 116 ill m 7-7 71 -1 4y F %5 55 uaL Ly Counts 47 - I;,ara �rtn� ra,aav�s C:%7Mh�'Jr+1T1f:S 4 a O rt t 7 r 0 i rt 4 + Nr. L i 4 —+ J 4 h14 + r J FW r r Nn nr• NA 15 -Min Count period Henry St Narthboon i; Henry St Southbound Hawaii Belt Rd E astbound liawa� 3e<t Rd We"orlurrd Tvtai Hourly 1 e rals lrfr Thr. Ri��ril C1 LeKk Thru Right tl lt�il }}7ru Eii';Yrl 1.1 I_t•dC r}reu I{:rri! it Beginning At 6:45 AM 7:04 AM 3: 57 32 40 13 y 0 77 109 48 26 C 69 20 0 p(, L9 21 e .+i 0 =i 7 162 03 0 170 a4 0 028 620 7:15 AM 7:30 Ali 44 81 8 24 81 7 0 0 112 78 78 25 0 68 35 0 27 32 - _8 U 40 0 a 14 138 132 0 160 124 0 778 ?68 7854 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 34 82 7 40 83 15 0 0 92 56 93 31 1 85 26 0 23 27 ?+ 27 0 93 30 0 4 L42 110 0 L55 117 0 725 782 2941 .3053 8:15 AM 54 81 1.2 U 89 71 37 0 2S 97 37 0 19 L84 Rrs 0 794 3D69 A:'i:AM .16 €,R ^� � fi7 n3 4C 4 94 3 i6 IF'� 131 (] 75L�iiSF f?eO15-Min I-OWTates Northbound Southbound Easthound Westbound Total Left Thru Right U left Thru Right U Let Thru Right U Left Thry Rigor U '.II':tl Iles r rJw Trucks 200 324 48 4 16 4 0 356 '2 308 148 0 8 G 100 d 388 148 0 36 16 76 4 736 344 C 44 20 3176 164 a:sir ns 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 12 a 0 4 4 0 3 15 2 la; r til :Crrr r, I,:i :e- :[:.I, .,,.,,;I I,I : ;; 1,V"I ,1 , 1:10 PM SOURCE: Q,4aIity Counts, LLC{http;/jW W.uuaiilyt,.uurres.ne) 1.877-580.2212 Pale 1 o' 1 Type of peak tiour being reported: User-Detirlecl Method for determ1nIn�, peak hour: Tonal Entering Uo',lrrE! LOCATION: henry 5t -- Hawaii Belt Rd QC JOB #° 14972604 CTTV/SIAFE: Hawaii, HI 9Aft;: Tue, Apr 30 201.9 aeo ti12 Peak -Hour: 3:45 PM -- 4a45 PM as 22 + 19t+ 34i Peak 15 Min: 3:45 Phr1 — 4:UC! ISM t + 1.3 0u5 it9 ti .0 ; 661 « 1% # 314 OM A r A.7 i 94 1.9 « 31 11414.191 % r -a. 7045 zd+4l3t r9 + SK �, s 29 -0,? QuaLity Counts -F U, U I J J + ` L 4 7 * 1 -1 F- Cr 11 1r 0 --- # N4 w t NA *y t h6 P- :15 -Min Count period Henry St NOrthbconCi Henry St Southbound Hawao Belt Rd Eastbouncl Hawaii Belt Rd Westbound) TotalTo ralh' Left Thru Ril�hl. U LM Thru Right 0 trtft Thru R' ht U Left T111u R. hl U i"hlrtingAt 3:00 PM 43 74 "1 9- 93 GI lu 46 i.18 5'. 0 8 L.52 85 0 863 a.15 PM 29 9S L :10 83 52 C 46 iS6 54 D 18 L43 7G 0 871 3:30 PM 3:45 PM 42 83 31 72. 12 D 0 84 99 73 41 8o 51 G 0 % 45 156 58 6 182 67 0 29 17 L45 82 0 147 74 0 871 877 3482 4:01) PM 4:1.5 FM+t 36 71 7 29 88 6 D Q 80 88 94 54 70 34 Q 0 40 51 161 69 D 164 73 0 14 2,5 L27 73 0 148 M Q 826 860 3445 3.434 4:30 PM 30 87 9 D 8"_ 98 51 d 54 1,56 82 0 16 L26 83 0 873 3436 4:45 PM 7H SU5 n R7 r, a7 0E h �a n 1a 1 ='1 s.5 n 29 138h S:OD PM 30 8S 7 D S7 82 54 0 10 15.1 72 0 8 L23 80 0 822 338.1 S -IS RM 23 811 13 0 7£i 79 55 0 41) 0 5' G 12 1.27 sty 0 $=6 1144 5:3D PM 27 63 8 D 82 6, 45 C 41 i 5 0 36 D 12 L_8 S.3 0 696 3163 5:45 PM 18 76 4 0 78 69 27 D 48 i•13 40 D 5 L02 77 0 685 201Li Peat[ 15 -Min Norrhho0nd Snuthhound Fasthound Westhound Flowrates ht fatal Left Thru Right U Left Thru Ri: U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U —77 Ste ites Heavy Truck& 174 788 48 8 n .0 tl 316 4 .370 704 d r Q IM 4 77,9 268 0 11 11 68 0 M 2,96 0 16 0 3 0 &H Pi d-JeAmins 0 0 8 _2 20 f3ityefes 0 0 i] tl 0 C 4 id A A 0 k 0 ia,lroarl 5t ed Njses t=c�mmenfs: Report generated on 5/13/2019 3:06 PM SOURCE: Qkwlfty Counts, LLC (http:lfwww.qualitWvvnts,net} 1.877.580.2212 Page 10 1 Type of peak dour being reoorted:Systern Peak Mebtlod for determ I n Ing peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Queen Kaahumanu Hwy -- HualalaI Rd (Northern Most) QC. JOB W 15039901 YJSTATU Kailua, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 soy 2229 Peak -Hoar. 7:DD AM -- &00 AM 6 18 r Peak 15 -Min: 7:15 AM — -1:30 AM f t i { 4 .i { � ]5t w 1d A ;©• 0 L� f] • D j t 0« u 97. r Q 1 r 9 r 9 9 2 4% F 9 r 3 -]#y � &$ Quality Counts -F -14 1.7 Tq C � 1 C. n + r Nn � avn J ■ L NA t NA 4-11 � 1 L tJ y � + N... -v r -vI "A r F NA r 1'a -Min Count Period Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy Northbound Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Southbound Hualala"r id {Northern Most) E asrbound Hualaiai lid (Norrhe'm Mmt) We"t if urrd lural Hourly lotali Cert Thru RiVit U L'IC Thru Right 11 It -fl Piro Ri hl U L"fl lieu R-;knt tl DpEinn;ro-gAt 7:tJ AV 7;15 AM 28 239 0 36 263 0 0 0 4 0 t90 -• L 212 0 r. 9 ti 6 0 0 18 d o 0 t1 u u u 0 0 4iz 549 7:3C AM 7;45 AM 32 260 0 68 223 0 0 0 0 4 198 8 0 176 7 0 24 6 0 14 0 0 1Ll 0 4 a 0 0 0 D 0 0 335 490 2047 R:Q{ +' V 815 A'%A 38 229 Q 35 232 ID 0 0 0 0 164 4 158 3 a 0 2 0 0 6 3 0 Q C 0 0 0 0 0 0 44; '];'i ?I);. t <122 .9 AM 1`,'. -;AV '14 Til I] i? 7:;4 i] 1 D 0 11 178 7.Q 187 ? (3 (} l) 0 6 1 Q ? U i1 ❑ D ❑ U D Q f; 1;T li! 1KI 1'..rl` Hedk 9'a Min F4s}'IhhnfrSd Southbouod kaslbound Wesibound I'Veawr i!e ti .�.._e bf,fl I hru R_:ght U t•ert Thru Right U Left Thru Right U inrl Thru Right U total II' ehirla vy7rsa•:1 !ori _(1132 0 0 24 0 0 a 0 848 44 0 40 C 35 0 0 72 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 C 0 0 2197 64 a 0 0 a 0 0 a o a a a 0 a �' � 11': t7F • � 'l0. �.r1��1 <'.jIL'dl:s'19;1 J:01910;40AM SQURCE:QualitYCounts, LLC {httpWjwww.pualityeounts•neL}1-x77-580-2212. Pale 1 o` 1 Type of peak hour being reoorted:System Peak Method for determin I ng peak hour: ToteI Entering Vo ,jrre LOCATION: Queen Kaahumanu Hwy -- HualalaI Rd (Northern Most) QC kO8 W 15039902 CM/STATE: Kailua, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 IC22 qu Peak -Hour; 3:00 PM -- 4:00 PM 14 36 IF* 77 1a:xk 4 L Peak 15 -Mien: 130PIa1 — 3:A5 PM � + t �9 I.$ � ,.r * 4 1 4 4 86 r 70 r U r 6 1* 923 F 9+ 4 1 9+ 3.2 f 2975 1W Quality Counts f 32 m ;:.: a,w� �_.�., ,, . N 4 1Y � r NA t NA 4- * NA r t n w r r �F :IF—Min Count Period Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Northbound Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Southbound Hualalai id (Nomhern Most) E astbound Hualaiai lid (Northern Mast) methuurrd Total LIr "Olaih' I.vFI Thru Ri ht Il 1.01 Thru Ri ht U Irfl Iii fhru ht UI_r ti Ih eu IiiFrd U Beginning At 3-00 PM 3;15 Ph1 2,; 219 0 9 227 0 0 0 0 0 247 U 239 4 0 3 4 24 U G` 18 0 J o Sl 0 0 J 0 0 s25 521 3:30 PM 22 261 0 0 0 242 3 0 0 0 IS 0 0 0 0 0 546 3:45 PM 25 216 a 0 0 257 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 517 2109 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 74 7Q p 22 221 0 Q 0 Q 0 268 4 226 4 0 1 3 Q 3 Q 0 23 0 0 0 Q a a 0 0 0 523 499 2107 2085 a: 3Q I1M 4:49 PM iA 198 0 24 218 0 0 0 0 n 700 1) 7,32 I 0 $ .5 0 21 f) 0 27 1) 0 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 440 507 1979 1969 5-0D PM 5-1.5 phi 112 178 0 17 209 0 0 0 0 a 237 5 0 252 2 4 3 4 0 30 0 4 29 Q 0 a 0 0 D 0 0 0 486 5'3 1932 1!mro 5:3D PM 5:45 PM 16 19S 0 1 13 141 0 0 0 0 0 225 3 0 252 3 D 4 0 01, U 0 _k, 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 450 425 1456 1574 Peak 15 -Min Norrhbaund Srwthbound fasr#rwnd Westbound Flowrates Left Thru flight U Left Thru W ht U Left Thru Right U Left Thru R' ht U lotal tilwf 0F. Iig,avy Trucks 8 1 N 4 0 0 Sig 0 0 768 17 0 8 r a 0 0 72 0 Q 0 a 0 0 0 0 4 d 2JR4 64 Pfa-Je Lraans Ncy€le.5 0 0 0 13 q a Q C >9 0 0 0 A 0 Q Q a Q 'Ia i I i o�!d Siu ped Gm -, Fir- �n t pr.n5:ratcd on 9112/2DI9 10,43 AM SOURCE; Qkwlity Courtts, LLC (http:ifwww.qualitWvvnts,net} 1-$77.580.2.212 Page 10 1 Type of peak tiour being reported:System Peak Method for determ I n Ing peak hour: Total Entering Vo ,lyre LOCATION: Queen Kaahumanu Hwy -- Hualaiai Rd (Southern Mash QC kO8 W 15039911 YJSTATE: Kailua, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 m U49 Peak -Hour: 7:00 Aho -- 8:00 AM 5 IL r lk ma 73 Beek 15 -Min: 2:30 AM — 7:45 AM r ll+ n .oma t 1► . a . n � t1A 13 f r F- } b 13 F # +is Quality Counts 49 Tq Q 11 fi 11 J L NA � � t NA * J wRraF m v t -► t . II# � r OFNA :[r -Min Count Period Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Northbound queen Kaahumanu Hwy Southbound Hualzilal lid {Southern Most) Easrboarxd Hualalai Rd (Southern Mast) Westbound Total Ir HTno1aIM' I.vF1 Thru Right Il 1.01 1'aru Righl if It -fl fhru hii;h,1 1.1 1_rkrl 1hru f!1 ht U Beginning At 7:00 AAA 7:15 Am U 241 0 261 to 23 183 0 a 191 0 3 li 1; L 0 0 C a 1) ;a 1.2 0 u 35 0 448 523 7:3[1 AM 0 267 a 23 193 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 37 0 535 7;45 AM 0 231 0 15 181 0 0 (11 0 0 0 0 56 0 485 1991 8:OC AM 8:15 A10 0 239 0 0 260 F 0 7 ; 172 0 1 172 0 1) 0 0 Q 0 0 0 fl 0 2 U 20 0 4 13 0 439 452 1987 1911 8:3(: A41 A:45 AM it ]1113 = r1 ?A? i] n 4 193 C 1) 17-/ a 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 p rl 1) 7 1 17 17 0 0 10 0 466 4R i 1947 18-414 Peak LS-Miri Northbound Srauthbound UMbound Westbound Flowralls "i 'rhru Right U Left Tnru Right U Left Thru Right U Lnr1 Thru Rigtbl tJ Total All Vehicles Heavy Truer. 0 -058 31 0 4 4 0 92 8 77? C ID 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 146 C 0 4 2140 52 PP.�PStri�r:s Q q 0 p p Bicycle= 3a lrc d 0 0 4 _ 9 0 a Q Q 4 0 1 2 f3u.ces rtc"ifed Fi C'd 11 s; Reaort generated on 9112/2019 10:40 AM SOuRCE: Quality Counts, LLC 0ttpJ/www.qual1tyrounts.neL) 1-877-580-2212. Pane 1 o` I Type of peak dour being reoorted:System Peak Method for determinIng peak hour: ToteI Entering Vo ,jrre LOCATION: Queen Kaahumanu Hwy -- Hualalal Rd (Southern Mosta qC kOB W 15039912 CTTY/STATE: Kailua, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 toss m Peak -Hour; 3:00 PM -- 4 -DO PM 19 3 * + (? 61 Peak 15 Mire: 3:00 Plat - 3:15 Pfut + + i} 15 ii7 4 4 # �0j tIa«2n 0• 7 r 9 14 r 9 F (i 9+ 0% r 73 r 79 1 � tom 9" ;uality Counts 4 • 26 as Tq J L J wRraF t NAS -► t NA* t -vI# 1IIII� my +}, IF � 4 t I 15 -Min t:oimt Period Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Northbound queen Kaahumanu Hwy Sr)uthbound Hual alai Rd (Southern Most) Eastbound' Hualalai Rd (Southern Mast) Westbound Total knurly Totals Left Thru Right Il 1_01 1 1 s Right Il Ie;fi Thry Ri hi U t14l 1hru Riehl U Reginningpt 3;00 Rm 17 242 0 0 0 1 o G {1 u 5 0 Z1 0 541 3:15 PM 3:3{7 Plot a 217 2 a 254 1 0 0 n6 0 241} 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1.3 0 0 19 0 5n- 540 3:45 PM 0 222 1 0 =4 245 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 0 18 0 505 2105 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 702 0 0 242 1 0 0 25 0 10 244 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 11 0 0 6 0 5:1 507 2075 2061 a 3 rlm 445 PM 0 207 2 0 21� 5 0 0 14 206 0 1) ;S 2S0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i 4 n 11 0 ❑ 14 n 441 447 1')$ 1 54 5:00 PM 571.5 PM 0 144 1 0 205 0 0 4 18 265 0 0 7.5 256 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 : 0 13 0 ❑ 16 0 495 s0:� 1438 1! 16 3:30 PM S:45 PM 0 192 1 0 16a 1 fl 0 6 246 0 0 7 247 0 1 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 458 421 1453 1877 Peak 15 -Min Northbound S"hbound Easthound wcsthound Flowrates Left Thru R- ht U Left Thru Ri: ht U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U lokal Ste it es FFP,auyTruck& ❑ Q 0 L2'. U 01, 1037 0 4 d 7Q C 0 0 a a 0 0 0 m 0 0 914 0 n 0 71 A 35 Pf d-JeAraans i cydc.s 0 4 Q ti] 0 0 n 0 0 0 0 A Q 0 Cl Q 0 0 '+a 110=rt Siu ' ped uu3ea Fir- �n t gr.n5:ratcd on 9112/2D19 10,43 AM SOURCE; Qkwlitvy Counts, LLC (http:ifwww.qualitWvvnts,net)1-$77.580.2.212 Page 10 1 Type of peak dour being reoorted:Systern Peak Mettlod for determ,inIng peak hour: Total Entering Vo •]rre LOCATION: Queen Kaahumanu Hwy PvapuaanW St qC kOB W 15039905 YJSTATU Kailua, HI DATIE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 %I ICw38 Peak -Hour: 7:CID AM -- 8:00 AM + I -7-.m U 43 Peak 15 -Min: 7:15 AM — 7,30 AM + + :. AA � 4 } 4 .. 0• I IL�9 4 r a U• r] —1 0 a's 2r4 F— 0 , 6 F d77 QuaLity Counts U Z, J Nla-v-NA � y � � I 7Jw � �T• -► f . r NA t 1'a -Min count Period Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Northbound Clueen xaahumanu Hwy Southbound PuaDuannui 9t Eastboarxd Puapuaanut St Westbound Total Hourly l olals Li�fl 1?1ru Right U LeKk. Thru R" hS U lt�fl Y}7ru Eii';hl !.I I_,kff 7Ptru Right U F- •inn, A# G .g 7:0, A. A 7:15 AM u 224 5 a 246 3 0 0 12 8 171, 0 D 184 0 0 0 t ii [1 I - 20 d 27 0 0 48 0 450 S09 7:3C AM 7:45 AM 209 4 0 174 12 0 0 _2 1a 188 4 1} 1.75 0 0 w 0 0 [7 0 D 0 18 28 0 48 0 D 62 0 489 462 19'10 8:0{, AV 8:'; 5 A "v! 0 218 iC 0 213 15 0 D 9 19 165 0 0 154 0 0 +7 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 18 9 D 39 0 4 30 0 459 44 7 191: 1850 R:'' �C AM £VA;A`•h 0 X20 c i D 745 11 0 D 16 ,d 179 0 0 1 :9 ❑ 0 0 0 f} ❑ 4) p fl fl 11, =7 I] :11 U D 73 0 4fiS Af9 1979 14'iF 11e,ik 1,, -Min Northbound Southbound kaslbound Westbound Itawr ilr:s Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right tl Lnfl Thru Righl U Total II 'wrhirlas :: Ur -rrn:l C 984 12 n 20 D 0 32 a 736 a 0 20 D D D 0 0 D o a W a 0 192 0 D s 2030 52 1=.,:::u• I::* ' r,41ed irn 9i 1 �J-019 1,01.40 AM SOtjRCE; Quality Counts, LLC ihttpd/www.quaIltycounts•neL) 1-877-580-2212. Pale 1 0` I Type of peak hour being reoorted:System Peak Method for determin I ng peak hour: ToteI Entering Vo ,1rre LOCATION: Queen Kaahumanu Hwy Puapuaan ui St qC JkOB W 15039905 CM/STATE: Kailua, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 1030 432 Peak -Hour; 3:00 PM -- 4:00 PM 14 3 • r n 91 11; Peak 15 Mie: 130 Plat — 3:45 PM t 0 n 1.7 e L carwAS 9 ♦ � 0• 0 A r 34 190 y 825 IB �CE 9+ 4 1 f 9 r 1S � * e 8 �2 �9 Quality` Counts I t C F— { a } r 1 WNA Jr N L L 4 ti « J IL J L :IF—Min Gaunt Period queen Kaahumanu Hwy Northbound queen Kaahumanu Hwy Southbound PuaDuannui St Eastbound Puapuaanui St Wim;#,nu rd Total Dourly IMP Lr Ft Th, Right Il 1_r•fl' Thru Right ;7 It -fl fhru Rii ,hl U 1_t4t1 Iheu Right U mniati A# Beginning 3-00 PM 3;15 Ph1 U 1.99 - 1 0 2,05 14 0 3 7 27 ..31, 0 243 0 L) 0 W 0 e C 0 o 7 _2 0 23 0 a 23 0 52.. 3:317 PIM 0 230 12 0 37 213 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 27 0 528 3:45 PM 0 191, 8 U 3'1 219 0 0 C, 0 0 0 5 0 34 0 489 2052 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 192 7 0 207 15 D G 34 38 275 209 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 12 I 0 15 q 0 35 0 496 5_5 2D37 2020 a: 3Q f M 4:45 PM 0 187 10 n 70R 15 0 0 ?7 311 147 0 x17 0 1) 0 a o 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 n 17 11 n 29 0 477 ;_7 1'}7] 1t34r. 5-00 PM 5-1.5 PM 0 1,59 7 4 195 11 0 0 49 3s 218 0 21.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 4 7 0 17 0 Ll 23 0 4S4 413' 190 1Hl-.i 3:30 PP -A 5:0.5 PM 0 177 18 1 0 131 S 0 0 24 29 220 0 22L L 0 0 0 i? 0 0 0 C 0 0 10 7 0 212 0 0 23 0 454 1 419 L i.'! L Peak 15 -Arlin Norrhhaund Snuthbaund 1=aUbound wesihound Flowrates Left Thru flight U Left Thru W ht U Left Thru RighL U Left Thru Right U local —77V—L7--1f-=7; H+Pauy Trucks ❑ R o 28 4 1413 tl 857 0 t7 F,` 0 I± 0 13 0 0 11 it 35 0 0 108 C n 12 7117 44 Ped'rsLaeans NcyclQs 0 a f) +] tl 0 11 tl 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q k 0 0 '+adlo�!d Oiu v ped Gm -,. Fir- �n t per,S!ratcd on 9112/2DI9 10,43 AM SOURCE; Qkwlitvy Courtts, LLC (http:ifwww.qualitWvvnts,net} 1-$77.580.2.212 Page 10 1 LF SOV Oi d. 7 ra U7 QaC, ic, 4i, L -1 --17 F --1 F- F T J n Ly L: Ci N d Y+'4 FY A Lin 4 .. 'f \ �" *� r f L ❑ r 9 w lit - o J 4 7"*F J x+ C$ JF 7F J n j b C �_ 0000 L J 44�pp5Y � dMryhry�L,yy�vSr��V.. pMp 4yh l.41,..lyyn�nM1 ,_ L C CdG'OGz '3=dd==C S Ln .} M1 P = co o 7 C Odtl C, G93 �, ••.s .0, _�':� V U DCib A B i � -1Y r # � —I ] r _ 3 r � - � Z f - s 1! r t FF -1 r r -17 �G LL W«M1�ti �� DPW gf J n Type of peak hour being reported: System Peak Method for determ I n I no peak hour: Total Entering Vo',lrrE! LOCATION Kuakilti Hwy,- Lako St qC kOB #: 15039907 CM/5-1 A TE: Holualoa, til DATL Thu, Aug 29 2019 9D 1310 Peak-liofilr° OD AICA — 8-00 AM 15 a r 1 W 141 Peak 15 -Min: 7:45 AM -- 8,00 AM + t *a ;A ',7 r 4 4 } 4 IN w 751 # L.3G7 r Sit 1S r 2 ! t. 1.9 w 19 48 * [&� r 3% 2.1 y . a 368 r 69 i r 63 M ]447.5 r 1', 1 r 1.B' r 4s 33 a:{*6F -45A Quality Counts N U 1 +11.L 1 1 it �— 0 # df fi C F- NAw t NA 1 Nue * t 1'r Mir7 count Period KuakiW H+uy Northbound Kualdni Hwy Southbound Lako St Eastbound Lako St We;Oround Total �talhr I,.rI Thru Ri ht U LJt Thru Ri ht ;f Irfl Thry Ri,ht U I_i•fl Him R± ht U HeBinningAr 7;0 °Atv1 7:15 AM s 221 15 8 188 14 D 0 34 36 152 29 1§4 35 D 0 f 611 G` 9 2- r_, 9 .7 6 rr3 0 7 61 0 589 616 7:M,AM 7:45 AM 6 202 15 6 181 11 0 0 34 37 171 36 170 26 0 0 57 77 11 79 0 24 16 .0 6 27 10 67 0 13 85 0 654 674 7533 8:t?3 ANA 815 AM 3 206 17 6 7 i 9 1 2 0 0 37 15 145 24 165 15 0 0 55 44 18 0 b 5 0 13 14 7 65 0 e2 51 0 501' 570 2545 2 499 8.3r A10 S 49 AM 4 220 15 9 71ra ?f: 0 0 30 36 180 22 1;fO 28 0 0 42 3s 9 10 0 1.0 9 0 15 13 6 70 0 8 fie 0 624 ;98 2469 739'1 Peak 15 -Min Howates Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Tota! Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Rigg U Left Thru Right U All Vehldes Heavy Trucks 24 724 44 0 B 4 0 148 .5 580 IC4 40 4 0 308 0 96 64 0 0 0 108 0 52 344 C 0 6 Z696 80 Pe,fes rians 6icyde5 0 0 1 4 4 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! c 2 Railroad St ed Buses Report generated on 9J12J2019 10:40 AM SOURCE: Ck,raIity Counts, LLC{hltp:ffavwW.uualilys.uurLcs.ne) 1.877-58042212 Paqe 1 0' 1 Type of peak hour being reoorted; System Peak Method for determ i n I ng peak hour: Tonal Entering Vo ")rrE! LOCATION Kuakf fti Hwy,- Lako 5t Q'C JkOB #: 15039908 CM/5-11 A TE: Holualoa, til DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 12 ?R 104 Peak -Hour; 3:00 PM -- 4:00 PM 12 36 f r 1'M8771& Peak 15 -Mien: 115 PM — 3:30 PM I$ M ' Gs 34 J 4 4 --1 1 4 4 M — iii # �, 143 . 29a 16 - 39 4P .. u 3039 33 FA y to it WS r 48 i r 62 375 7"9 r Il 1 r lb r �.S 31 754 F "17 33 *6 ' " F W7 Quality` Counts 1� i I + L -1 F - + Cr 1 fi f3 a r w L 14A L NA r NA M NA r w r s t n 1 !r Min Court Period KuakiW Hwy Ncrthbound Kualdni Hwy Southbound Lako St e=astbound t-jko Sr We;#,nurrd IoLaI Hourly l Ota 4d'Ff Thru Righ4 U Lelk. Thru Right t} erfl Thry Ri ht LI r r.0 4heu R-+,nt it Re inn, Ar E .g 3:0DPPO 3:13 "0 :,s 1`:D 7 191! y T �0 42 5- 716 3S '3.43 :a G D �'r" 28 5 U L' 8 ti D 2i � [1. 9 S] 9 46 3:3D Pm 3:45 PM i? 136 17 5 176 9 a 0 3_ 47 211 4= 207 45 0 0 19 33 8 7 0 9 17 U 6 "- 63 J '0 33 0 ii5e fiO3 2582 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 33 1.V 7 19 1': 4 0 57 Si 220 33 223 6f} a fJ 33 25 10 12 0 9 14 {] 17 21 S 39 i1 43 0 699 —=r,,. " 2595 a: 31) RN4 4:4S PNu 10 177 12 199 '> 0 0 42 52 202 35 2410 41 1) 0 31 30 10 7 4) 10 7 tl 20 18 8 41 0 8 % 0 6❑7 GIs 754r) 7:617 9 -DD Plat S-1.5 Pm 10 168 12 177 0 4 30 5S 225 57 242 S3 0 4 31 28 6 8 10 11 13 17 7 10 8 34 0 10 34 0 609 5s 2590 ,..;1. 3:3D PM 5:45 PM 6 167 y 5 1.36 12 0 0 60 32 209 44 215 5C 0 D 20 28 11 6 0 15 in 0 1.1 13 38 0 7 23 0 551' r i6 240:', Peak 15 -Min Norrhhaund Southbound Fasthound westhound Flowrakcs Left Thru R' ht U Left Thru Ri: ht U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U [Otal 47V—L-7,(-es FFP,auyTrurks ?#i 76B 77 ❑ 16 ❑ ❑ 70 d 977 180 S C 0 1.12 1.5 32 565 0 Q a 40 Q 35 15 ❑ n 72 7fa97 CiEi Pf d-JeAraans 0 0 0 4 4 `�i ed nu3cn Fir- �n t gr.n5:ratk on 9112/2D10 10,43 AM SOURCE; Qkwlitvy Counts, LLC (http:ifwww.qualitWvvnts,net} 1•&77.580.2.212 Page 10 1 4 +� L 13 l: +� A to .+ r �� -1 M } 1 !• �^. r } �" G « � S J -1 F 2 + 'Fy^ �6 —nom O 4 D 'L L —I-, —1 1• � a 7 N p� N Yi LL�R•n5h JC AJJ +10 �,•.• �.��i 1 �� Z M v. L L 1 � JI h 'J 1b —jK _ 27, µµ — J O 8 r. 'J.F' Nl I S y _ - —24 L J L C ooac �ncooc �c Su — T w 1 r 1! rF- t F.71 P: Run pate: 2016.10&1 S Hawaii Deparimenl of Transporlation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey SecUon 2015 Progrorn Couni -Summary Site Id: 13711721 if 20 18 Town: Hawaii DIR 1: -MP DIR 2: -PrP Final AADt 25900 Functional Class: UIPSAP1i:PRINCIPALARTERIAL , OTHER Gaunt Type -CLASS Counter Type= 7,)he Rauh Mo: 11 Wc9tian: Qu Gert Kaahv uwv Hwy - Hualalai Rd Ig Nani Kailua Or T -AM DIR 1 77q 2 TOTAL TIME -AM DIPI 1 DIR 2 TOTAL T'PAF-471.1 DIR T DIF? 2 TD -AL TIM&PI,1 DIR T DIR 2 TOTAL DATE; INA012Cn 5 1206.12:15 20 =3 39 1`4 15 M IN 216 12:0]-1115 273 233 436 06AD-06.15 240 193 433 12:151,230 17 5 22 77 95 223 31a 12:15-1230 228 236 454 06:15-48 AD 235 188 403 12'} 1245 in 7 2a 5 lg6 276 'M4 12:911.72'4,5 226 244 473 0631>.%AD 226 1741 407 12:45-01'00 15 11 26 .'17 12t 284 405 12:45-01.00 217 275 442 05.45.07 136 211 Pyr 372 D1 AD -0115 12 3 15 .. i:`, !::; 15 16& 242 410 4500.61:15 211 240 499 07 P74.07.15 201 129 330 n1"15413D 5 9 17 ,.-I D7'3p 233 779 t.Ia 225 213 438 91'15-0136 177 411 375 0130-01 As B 6 14 15. 19h 278 45a 0:30-0.1:45 217- 209 426 07 36-07 11,5 172 82 254 0145 02.01) 9 11 19 ...+1 184 260 447 41.45-021X 255 %4 sm 07,75Lw DD 157 7A 215 02VC-62,.15 6 4 11) "•:A 1!1` 157 ?M 455 42'1.0-@1.75 248 2294 502 R9 o1) -M 15 1'34 119 847 62'15,0236 9 3 12 !'S.08. -A 172 273 445 4255-)230 254 267 521 00 156936 119 69 fab X3300].^.:46 .1 4 a :'I kS tG 13& 274 410 42:20,02:45 343 230 4E1 093008 w5 E31 77 2159 02:45.0.9'06 4 6 1D :r J: +,1:1 155 :78 433 42'45-03'.00 2-59 271 $30 D8'4506130 33 15 168 03*D-W115 2 9 t1 ,...,! 0 15 176 2200 396 48:1)3-43'15 361 225 486 (3926478'15 $90 7Q 4?8 WAS -03 AD 4 a 12 Cl9.15-09.36 155 254 4417 43:15-03330 252 263 615 09.15-09x6 111 55 196 rCi 1}1)946 B 141 is p$9l16945 IBS 227 412 418 'T Q; Q1, 217 21`° 47E Q. &,MAD 1119 52 too D3 45-04.00 4 24 25 C845-10 VU 175 273 448 413:45-04.00 244 276 51-4 m4'S-lQ a6 108 0 153 0466.011.15 4 23 27 1000-10.15 162 258 418 01:01.(A:15 222 240 462 10001015 92 41 133 r)4 15,rm 3n 12 33 46 10 1h -t0 3V 175 236 "a 9411$ 04 W 226 246 474 10'1,3.141 31) 93 ! 4 ta7 0436-09:55 Tr 39 +5 t0.58-10:45 18& 203 451 Q4:3a-G4:45 249 252 561 10.38-141:45 51 44 125 04145-05131) 14 89 Al 1`045-t1,40 202 277 479 04:45{05"{70 259 237 4915 E045111A EE 39 105 C6V0.05:15 14 52 76 11[1011'.155 197 216 413 115:00-f,6'15 252 194 4413 11;4141-17:0. 51 2Y as 65:15.05.36 23 97 t2D 11:15-1139 2D3 147 MCI 05:15-0530 233 222 455 111:15-1130 53 2�9 a2 063 005,45 37 127 16 4 113Q 11:4F221) 222 432 05:30.06:45 217 17G 1111:4 .7(1 40 1A 64 13,5145.]7.0!60 411 153 t9; 1'T Af, 1,2.4Q 342 247 409 QbA546:M 223 196 419 11:45-12408 37 14 51 AM COMh U ER PERN10+.05.041-0&061 EIIR 1 11072 PMC061MUTEP PERIOD 15 DD-kgAQl DIR T (IgR2 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL. PEAK AM - PEAK 14RTOME 07.16 AM la 011.15 AM PM PEAK HR TIME 413:06 FW to 04`00 PPA AAI - PEAK 14R VOLUME 164 11113 IBM PM PERK HPI VOLUME t064 9117 1991 AM K FACTOR 1%b 4" E15 PM K FACTOR 1„4•I 7 25 AM - sj .; i 40.51) 0.40 t008a "M D I-- 50.48 4D.57 13990 IDIRECTIONAL PEAK C RST AL PEAK AM PEAK HR TIME 67 OD APA to ca.D6 AI4 uam AM ro com AM Pm - PEAK H R rIME 03:00 1-M io 64.06 PM 03:45 PO 14414.46 Pte AU - PEAK HR VOL4IME 775 1121 P44 PEAK N R VOLUME" toot lb 117 AM PERIOD iw m -t2 005 PM PER101b 112:66-24:1061 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIREOTIONAL PEAK AAI • PEAK FIR TIME 07.T5 AU Ic 09;15 AM PM - PEAK MR TWE 02:1:0 PIA 113 03130 PW Illi - PEAK 14R VOLUME 754 1115 IBM PM - PEAI( H14 VDLUPAE INA 1090 2034 1}M K FACTOR 1%: Tx 65 PM . K. FAI;TCR (-ol 7' 41 AM 0;%I 46.68 r,; 4n WOW PIA -'),%I 49.,,ir, 1'0fA 11117417 ru0Nfi0MMuTfR PE111Lti :.as no 15.m1 &HA 12 -HR, 24 -HR PENODO LIR bin 2 IL a1 TWO I}IRFC IInNAL Pr AK AM 5 -HR PE-StJ 7 01761,83-12 PD1 4,(613 6 876 141.$ F I -=AX H11 TM=: 02.`60 PFA tD W:D3 PM AM 12 -ISR P'ERIM 10000-12,901 4,346 5.7_�- 11,125 RcAA HR VD _IJW1 MN 10-96 2034 PM 5 -HR FE)1013 x12.00-ta:Cl51 aura 5'096 11.369 DIRECTIONAL PF AK PM t2 -HR PERIOD 11"L1,24,W1 &11)9 7.610 13.315 PEAK HRTIME 02 06 FM to D313D FM 18.40 AM to 11 DD AVT 24 HOUR QETM 130 t3,D51 14,369 27,4dD PEAK HR VOLUME '(104 1052 1) 1%) 47.56 6244 1436.00 Run pate: 2016.10&1 S Hawaii Deparimenl of Transporlation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey SecUon 2015 Progrorn Couni -Summary Site Id: 1371001 if 20 18 Town: Hawaii DIR 1: -MP DIR 2: -LAP Final AADt 25900 Functional Class: URH,AP,i:PRINCIPALARTERIAL , OTHER Gaunt Typa:CLASS Counter Type= 7,7he Rauh Mo: 11 Wc9tian: Qlreerl Kaahv R1$r1U Hwy - Hualalai Rd Ig Nani Kailua Or T -AM DIR 1 t8s9 2 TOTAL TIME -AM DIR t DIR 2 TOTAL TIME-Pih DIR 1 DIR 2 TO -AL TIME•PI,1 DIR T DIR 2 TOTAL DATE 5 09112915 12 W. 12:15 17 6 22 i4 15 e9 191 250 12:67-12.15 191 205 394 05 AD -06.15 220 469 376 12:151230 10 9 19 ;.t -. .. DO Be 220 309 12:15-1230 164 214 499 06:15-0836 204 143 347 1291} 18°45 IR 7 16 5 102 254 ;156 12:9n•r2'4.5 219 19n 40 063110643 P62 422 294 12:45-01'(113 5 18 91'} 139 271 407 12:45-01.013 214 379 423 06.45.0704 176 136 306 91 Ao-01 15 T 2 9 .. i:`, !::; 15 174 263 497 4S00.01:15 210 202 412 07 JW -07.15 173 130 306 61 "15 41 317 4 4 B ,.'I .DT'3P 714 781 !XII E39 2Y79 439 91'14-0130 r56 196 4961 91 X0-01.55 3 2 5 t5 195 299 4941 01:30-M A13 231 2116 489 07 36-07 11,5 151 67 838 O7 45 02.01) 2 5 7 ...11 174 2M 4.12 41.45-02.1°2 2N2 192 434 (1745A0 A1) 139 102 241 02VC-62..15 1 7 5 •:H 1ti 154 180 434 02'W3-WV7 716 21,7;3 413 R9 OD -M 15 131 71 392 02'15,0230 6 5 11 .s.08. -A IBa 276 4611 42'55-}230 241 237 468 08'15-(932 432 72 294 02300].^.:45 .1 6 lb '."1 "m 1G 191 242 443 42:30,12:45 241 229 470 093009 w5 F45 64 209 02:45-W'013 I1 2 13 : r J: +,1:7 166 "287 405 02'45-06'.00 189 260 4917 99'45Ug 130 131 Be 219 03*6-03115 P !0 1$ ,...,! 0 !L 145 242 4.38 83:43-M-15 218 260 478 09 OD -cm 15 ITO 54 164 WAS AD 5 70 15 86.15-0930 15t 284 395 03:15-03330 224 265 4a9 09.15-09AD 47 61 154 5-330 09 46 27 311 09 51 09 45 10C> 224 449 43 TQ;4r 220 252 474 0. &rM 4f I42 69 440 L[3 X45-04:96 h 18 19 054,9-1000 170 261 131 W 45-G4.D(I 190 223 413 Lia A.=.-1(1 04 159 311 11% D4JY,-OA.15 7 i9 26 1000-10.15 156 249 405 01:00-04:15 195 218 413 10 *81015 74 51 125 rya 75 ri43p 2 Z, 7'9 to IA- I+13V 176 737 443 94 11 G4 W 1215 2.56 41,1 10'14 1413p fit 39 Iql 0430.01:45 15 45 dry t0.56-10:45 1614 257 425 04:30-h4A5 239 226 467 10.38-141 A5 fi5 39 105 174 w5-05111) 12 BB 79 TO 45-11..40 3116 24d 452 04:45{05"00 257 249 SAd 40 45111A 51 2a 37' u1V0.05:15 10 58 Try 11,3011'.10 165 243 407 0:00-09'15 293. 229 452 11 QQ-17:I. 411 3e 84 05:15.05.30 23 1152 125 tI.l`.r1130 204 249 453 05:15-0530 246 I9D 438 11:15-1136 28 25 54 053005,45 33 lag 16:4 113011:45 23( 236 465 (5:304)6:45 2511 192 449 113(.11:45 10 26 F6 W 146.1$!00 139 167 200 77 Af, 1,?.4p 191 1.30 4,21 0bA54i6:170 2'15 17,1. ,430 11:451,24M 30 A 514 AM COM7dUTER PERI'L79+.05.0099061 DIR 1 DM42 PIACO4AMUTER FER00115 DO-f9.01T1 DIR T ❑1112 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL. PEAK AM - PEAK 14RTIME 07-00 AM la 09.00 AM PM PEAK HR TIME 21:11 P44 Ia(15:15 PPA AAI - PEAK 14R VOLUME 757 1197 T864 PM PERK HPI VOLUME %1 962 1990 AM K FACTOR 1%1) 7 t3 PM K FACTOR i%'I 7 38 AM -4j.; I 40.51 50,39 100(9 PM D1-- 50.16 1064 10400 IDIRECTIONAL PEAK o RST AL PEAK AM PEAK HR TIME e? OD AIA to o.ov AM 9: c5 AMro oB!l5 AM Pia - PEAK 11 I3 rIME e+A51-M In 61545 PM a3,w PO to e4.00 I°M AU - PEAK HR VOL41AME 7-.7 1124 P44 PEAK N R VOLUME 1.008 14W AM PERrt3D 160:RJ-r2:I1o5 PM PERIOD 142:00-24:061 TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK TWO OIRECTIONAL PEAK AM • PEAK FMR TIME 0744 AM Ic 09.07 AM PM - PEAK MR T15A.E 02:45 PSA 10 03:45 PIX Ali - PEAK mR VOLUME 757 1147 1364 PM - PEAH H14 VOLUME eat 1PL39 1931 AM . K FACTOR 1%: 7 T;4 PM . K. FAI;FCR (-ol 7.3$ AM•G{%I 40.67 f+g89 WOW PM-plxl 46.19 53.91 110090 NON -COMMUTER PE+11Lti :.as no 15.(71 &HA 12 -HR, 24 -HR PEA10D9 DIF 1715-1 2 toal TWO I}IRFCI INNAL PI -AK AM 5 -HR N(4Ht, O ((761013-12 P47 4.UAI 6 Ptiti(x In I -=AX HII T MS: 02.100 PN tl W:00 aM ATM 12 -KR PERIM 10000-12,D01 4,256 6.782 110-18 REA,A 119 V0_IJFAE. 922 9t9 te41 PM E -HR FE)1013 rl2.M-t8:00) 5.380 5,292 i8.E.2 (DIRECTIONAL PF AK PM t2 -HR PERIOD 11Ynn,74,wl &%A 7.44," 1(..... PEAK 1,111-MAE 151 45 FM 10 D2 A5 FM 09:90 AM 5-o 16:30 AM 24 HOUR VETM IOD t2,330 13!829 Z6 59 PEAK HR VOLUME 934 MI 1) 1%) 47.13 62 a1 1{1;::00 Run Date: 20 1 6/0511 9 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2015 Sile Ib, 871M111203a Rauh No: 11 Date From: 2015.+48!10 4:44 Town; Hawaii DIFection; 4AP Wte TO: 2015149!11 23:45 Location: Queen Kashumartu Hwy - Hualalai Rd to Nen-i Kailua Or Functional Classification: 14 LI R 8 AN -P RINCI PAL ARTERIAL - OTHER REPORT TOTALS - 48 HOURS RECORDED Bus SINGLE UN17 TRUCK 2A -6T 3A -SU 4A -SU SINGLE -TRAILER TRUCKS 4A -5T 5A -ST 6A -ST MULTI -TRAILER TRUCKS WMT 6A -MT 7A -M7 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS CLASSIFIE=D VEHICLES TOTALS UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS AXLE CORREC7kUN FACTon (AC) 0.989 HEAVY VEHICLES VOLUME 60 NUMBER QF AXLES Cycles 263 0.49910 525 PC 45148 84.23% 94296 2A -4T 7438 13.88% 14876 LIGHT VEHICLE TOTALS 52849 98-80% 105697 Bus SINGLE UN17 TRUCK 2A -6T 3A -SU 4A -SU SINGLE -TRAILER TRUCKS 4A -5T 5A -ST 6A -ST MULTI -TRAILER TRUCKS WMT 6A -MT 7A -M7 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS CLASSIFIE=D VEHICLES TOTALS UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS AXLE CORREC7kUN FACTon (AC) 0.989 HEAVY VEHICLES 0.021/. 60 85 0.16% 213 96 0.11 l3% 192 164 0,131% 492 29 0.0511/6 116 266 0.50°/6 1484 5U 0,090/6 254 30 0.06% 180 12 0.021/. 60 1 0,40% U 15 9,03% 105 748 1A0% 2678 5$597 (A) 100.01)% 1Q8378 (B) 2 0,00% ROAOTUSE EQUIVALENT{BIZ} = 54187 ;C i mv. mrwo HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAT( PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTQH VOLUME : 2034 HOUR HOUR TRUCK %OF (PEAK�AAADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT (ITEM 06) 21)15 d9+1d 14;00 VOLUME 'aADT SINGLE UNFF (55A-1) {65A -2j TRUCKS (TYPE 4-7) 10 0-49% 187 0,72% 7.8 25944 COMBINATION (65B-1) (6513-2) (TYPE 8-13) 10 0-499. 187 0-729'6 7,95% TmIlic [)ala Service -t'ru.tl iti .S 11.1Lin Sketch N ItiImid: Area: Kom Section 1DIStalion #' B71COI 112033 Hualalal Road D2 ---------------------------------------------------------- Queen Kaahuranu Hwy D1 P. i. Narm Kailua Dr SLS. 1. b%,67 DOM3007U71001 112018 19.63455, -155.9779 2. DO -5)3(M1371001 t 11035 Station dl'SuIp11Qri. Queer) Kaahumanu Hwy. I-puaialal Road ba Nan+ Kaibua Dr SIgYC4 13eg111 CtITlg Ii:llGiTlm' SofvC4' End.lhg TIC{F1YCk;: 50116 0 10xI Y.Vlb 0' 2400 5ur4'cy Wdt+.M1- Rood Tul'x 1?jta Type: Glad. Survey Crew. Lm C I B 5kctoh [JpcialCd: Iiw: SR 1':t.R1:4C1iv 1.V2 FACILITY hGlti!riE 11Jk1 FUNC AREA RC71.f'I'E CLASS TYPE. NO. MILE Queen 1Caahulnanu Hwy I 1 0110 D1= D1�ctinrt t{3 EFli T11: Nam Kailua Dr/ Pu]oni R<I GRiv 190D L?2= LMifCCtiisn in liogia 1}_. Hu31a1a1 ROaCI 1 Knttlehuroeha hve i Ric 19 1 Run Date: 20!7 0B.0S Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 20116 Program Count - Summary Sle ID: 871 Ga1112d38 TGwn: Hawaii DIR 1: 1 M;1 OIR 2; -MP Final AADT 258057 fuixtlo" Class- URBAN: PRINOIPAL ARTERIAL • OTHER CoLml Type: CLASS CC]Uri Wir Typ,-: Tube Route No: I t Localiow Queen Kaahumanu Hwy - Iivalalai Rd to Narii Kailua Of TIME -AM DIP 4 131pr 2 TOTAL TIME•AM DIR 1 0?n 2 TOTAL TIME -PM DIR i DIFI 2 707AL -IME-PM GIq 1 D-111 2 TOTAL DATE, 05W.2916 12:00 T2 75 t9 5 24 O6.L`n 46 F5 a 2165 274 18410 12:45 212 7419 4111: '8.:tf'1 15 194 111 825 t2:1542:30 16 3 19 06:1546:30 73 226 306 12:15-1.2M 220 262 122 00•.55-.6 N 'IN 127 3H 12:X.12 4Id r 19 06:9461445 11' 292 4(9 1Z;9)124a 215 261 41s at31;a45 17y 1" 3111 F2:45-09 08 7 7 14 05:45,17 1710 147, 242 392 12'45-Gl .M 214 260 419 16 45-07, DH 164 1227 ill, d!1'f,91471 Is 6 4 18 071V t1.''5 111': 2170 4:Sn III M,Or't6 1534 1" 41,72 ..i :, :'..' 7R I" 169 ab., 01'15-01313 4 2 a 07 T64730 2211 252 4153 01'15-01;.90 210 1?4 394 T :- - i11 151 165 257 61::50431:45 9 3 12 07'?0 67. s 19" 291 458 01:33-01`:45 733 191 424 ft, - ." 7 •15 189 142 2715 014'-547R 48 7 n 12 074!'1.:11"114 19:1 1562 442 DI245.n2:617 725 213 438 u1; 4'i -16[X1 I" fA 215 62:0043215 4 6 10 004:0 O6 r5 144 867 41'T 02160-02:t5 246 224 476 :2: v. '8.5 114 69 167. i7C.15-02 38 1 ti 12 '7F: 'S -LIB Q 154 252 416 0215-02:311 234 71 t 455 ;:r ' :'..r, .w6 111 76 151 6233-02:45 3 5 8 OE 0l0^.15 Is] 256 421 02:36-02:45 245 213 456 66.37.'"1".15 132 E4 1916 c2 45-m on 4 5 9 OE 45.1G W 146 253 418 02:45-03:150 293 291 524 06.45.0 DO 104 96 159 4111:00433:15 5 a 17 09 00 19 r3 142 253 395 09180-03:15 223 290 4133 119,00-0915 95 53 14A 03'15.43'38 $ e1 141 SF1.0510'w 178. 2a4 448 83111%1031?0 i'.r.R ,.^2N 466 09-415 m'10 9J 43 13.9 6L1l33473: 45 5 13 22 OS A*.09:45 174 286 445 03.00•(73;45 ?:l5 257 493 112,30,V 45 as 52 135 0:454J406 6 20 26 06'45-10'00 153 210 373 43:45-0 252 20i 948 894'-T4.08 143 41 144 V.00-04.15 7 19 25 13:00-1D:15 171 199 399 04..0-01.13 249 24m 1195 10170-iD,15 TS 35 111 7114'166(A .AGI 4 V :%1 11):14.1D'n 161 2311 374 1J4 :39 224 46% 10:1544'N t6 36 IDT 64:30-04 45 6 49 35 111209-16'45 157 2TO 373 0411(14.4`1 27B 269 497 10:30-10 45 45 29 a5 04:45435, 41 73 5F fig 1645-11 00 195 I'M 343 04.45.0' iI 2:16 218 449 1645.11 00 51 201 71 1500-0515 23 '73 9C ll.cc-1 t:T5 2.'4 265 620 05W-01`..11 2d5 179 424 1t'60 -f 1.13 47 0 16.05 (1 6 7 99 11 1r- ;'n 141': 201 396 n. In.1Yr':',n $5I 1{,16 Alt II 1' 11'30 M M Y2 {75.36-0545 41 640 t8; 1131.- 45 199 243 4A1 05.:1015:45 260 178 436 it.3041:45 27 15 42 65:45416.06 5.4 260 _14 II 4r -u6 1B7 IB -1 aE9 OS 15 OS.:80 229 lid 4172 11-45.1'1110 r 9 30 AM CONMILITER PERIOD 105:00-09:1X3 DIP Y D:l 2 PFM COMNAITER FERIOD (15.'10-19x305 Daq 1 MR2 170121 WFIECTIONALPEAK TWO QIRECT1 NAL PEAK AM - PEAK HR TIME. (mw AM iD 0690 Ann F'h4- PEAK HH TIME 63.15 PM fo 34:15 PIM Aµ, PEAK HR VOL LNE '-R 1045 1913 PfO PEAK 14R;'00JIME 1044 979 1902 AM - K FACTOR f%J 7_D8 FM- K FACTOR 1%1 7.74 AFF Di%; 32.55 5754 10020 Phi -,7:"161 58515 46.34 100.130 01PEGTIONAL PEAK DIREG E101`4AL PEAK AM - PEAK HFI 1WE adrAAVto06:60AM 06:30 AM Lo013DAM PM PEM HHtME 03155PMw159:45pM 03C0PMlu84:000M AFM PEAK HR V:)l.Ue X 789 105+6 PFM . PE4K Hfl V0LLJME 1020 492 JIM 'LF IUE1 diWJC ,2(11)1 I'M PE RIOC11 F2;46.24'001 T'.4O aIFl5CT1�240.L PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK All PE.AE HR 'I 1.1E VT.o0 AM an Da a6 AM PM - PE,Ak NR TME. In 45 PM m M 155 PM AFF PFU HR w2.11,MF 70 1045 1813 PR PEAK HR VOLIMME 949 1637 1966 AIL-K"-AL:I(W.. 1'Ro, 11.08 pU-K rAITON 1%1 716 AM D t ,;,` 42,'611 57,414 146.66 PW D 1%) 4776 32.29 WON) W,'I EH I'I R113p iAYP W1 5V01 wiR t2 -HSI 24 -HR P04005 Din 1 III We 2 T9k3l POO i71+�F.2.1Ify',AL. FEAK AM"I'l PERIOD r]F.'1Y1 3.923 8'mo 9,60 PF,Ak-IIIiyF na-WPRm43'08PM AM12�3{:'PFRRII"1::'111151 8111 A.220 6,4476 1+7529 PEAK.HR4OUJME 963 945 1906 PW 6 -HR PERI0D 11 z.00 I EGO', 3,093 5,092 16,792 DIRE CTIONAL PEAK PM 12 -HR PER 10D, 12 A'2A 1761 4,325 6,844 14.969 PEM HTi TOM 82.00 PM 113 c3 Dn 261 nip:DD AM Ia ta.aD AM 2a ts!iuF1 P AV) 12.,545 13.652 25.597 PrA1i Hai VOLU16% 10. 959 D {Wj 49.61 W.1.49 1641.00 Run Date: 20!7 0B.,0S Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section 20116 Program Count - Summary Sle ID: 871 Ga11120 a TGwn: Hawaii DIR 1: M;l OIR 2: -MP Final AADT 25800 fuIxtio" Class- URBAN: PRINOIPAL ARTERIAL • OTHER Counl Type: CLASS CourlWF Typk-= Tube Route No: I t Localiow Queen Kaahumanu Hwy - Fivalalai Rd to Naini Kailua Of TIME -AM DIP T 171P[ 2 TOTAL TIME•AM DIR 1 ESIR 2 TOTAL TIME -PM DIR T DIFI 2 707A2 TIME -PM C+IP1 1 L:111 2 TOTAL DATE : Lbn".'7U16 T2:00 T215 13 2 15 0 .IM 46 F5 59 1115 2419 124012:t5 :U1 195 .1'L .I 17U•d675 209 14: 2&2 t2:15 -t2:31 42 6 241 06:15-06:30 97 255 352 12:15-1.2M 253 221 17,- 3C•.ta-1636 2W 169 369 12:X.12 45 9 d 1„1 06:94616'45 122 248 R71 1x;91) 12:45 269 Igo 11,:' :'At X14445 1&T 189 :i?? t2:45-11 00 12 5 1? 05:46.7 170 135 242 330 1 Z45-0l.M 22P 219 4,1 Y 16 45-47 D1 167 a5 273 T}1'r,X1-41 15 11 9 1i 07;rx7 El.' 15 193 279 471 Cil 'ag,ijr't.y 227 244 ,:.: ::: :, :%' t, 1P'1 lig 244 41115-01 3a a 1 9 07 T647 30 197 284 481 n 1 5-01 ;.90 213 216 , .. ..- - 1..1 148 142 250 41::40411:45 B 7 13 07.:'!O 67.•15 201 248 495 01 AN3T:45 236 202 .:7 •ti 141 79 224 414-54VM 6 3 9 07 0'.41p, 114 168 46$ 433 n 45-02:m 213 215 .I.�r '; i�,-1113 na 134 86 2A0 62:0040215 d 6 R 00 i:A X16 15 14& 244 397 02100-02:T5 219 215 I:; r .:,::i.' '..$ 15 127 70 07 42:15-0230 5 11 161F:'S-LI6:I4 154 753 407 0215-02:511 245 235 IR, ;:r' :'..r,.A 130 69 199E 02nD -12:45 a 5 19 0E =(' l0^ 45 155 234 399 02:96-02:45 226 233 159 21 :R 45 125 E7 192 92 45-0301 6 3 A GE 4'.l', 10 14* 234 381 OZ:45-03:170 290 258 4311 :n$ 49.".0 [M 105 E9 171O 43:05-0[1:15 7 7 14 D9 00 '14 rj 189 207 378 09586-03:15 245 230 465 :09 0."19 15 127 &3 19.1 03'15.43'31 Y Y 14 Ul 101419'w 13'0 231 :16Y W 111%.03'?0 267 7.12 474 ft-*'m'W loq 13'F 185 mlx3 ca 45 5 17 22 OS A*.04:45 147 227 424 119.70-03;45 230 197 435 02,30-(9 45 93 50 141 83:45-0400 3 21 24 00'45-18'44 lu 239 407 03:45-04:IC' 2551 311 411 00'15-T4.00 92 2E Iwo 44.00434.15 a 12 28 ,1:P:9-1115 155 2T4 359 04..0-01.15 256 227 46& 10170-tD,15 66 30 184 4.4'16(AA 4 do 44 1):161D'a4 167 2Q 429 1)4'1.1?4 ":11 215 231 44$ 10:154QN fig 00 44:30-04 45 11 50 61 11}:309-11DA5 1B1 242 422 0470-U4.47, 275 221 496 10:30-1045 93 27 91 04:4541[01 15 64 79 1134.'5-1100 203 191 394 0445.,1";11 260 218 473 1645.1100 49 rf, 64 1500-0515 216 is 101 11'6[ 1t:T5 202 299 d1t 05W4,1..15 249 10 466 It'60-T1.113 12 !4 515 019408341 131 93 Tryg 11.1r- -'n 2Tia 113 313 n.. Iro.n':',n ;$3 1" 42& 11-lr1.1130 Iy7 23 a31 {75:33-0545 3R .27 t65 1131•.- 4j "'q 237 417 05.30[5:45 215E 151 402 it.3041:49 25 33 30 175:45415:08 46 :79 24 111E �_ 133!,. 19J 417 U 15 OS.i9CJ 240 179 414 I1-45.1S1no 35 t 43. AM CONTAILITER PERIOD 105:00-00:10} DIP 1:12 PFA' COMNA3TER PERIOD (15.'CV-19:305 ;3a41 13iR2 1701121DiFIECTIONALPEAK i1N0fIRECT3 NAL PEAK AM - PEAK HR TIME (mw AM ro Da9D AM FV- PEAK HH TIME IM -45. PM 1014:45 Put Aµ, PEAK HR VOLL7e4E 761. 1119 1890 PfO PEAK HR 1'00JIME 1003 996 1999 AM - KFACTOR f%J 7.32 PAT -K FACTOR 1 1 733 AFF Di%; 4D.43 59.5112 11020 P%t-,D:%j 52-172 4','7'.e 100.1w 01PEGTIONAL PEAK pIREO, TaONAL PEAK AM - PEAK HR1WE atiDclAVto0amaAM Ulm aMroDa:a1AM PM PEM HRtME 14:30PMw05:34r'M (I345PMtu14:454-M AFM PEAK HR VI)L.UFAE 78t 111$ PFM . PEOjK HA VOL.L ME 1037 996 JIM 'LFII:[1 dYWJ1 12 4V1 PM PE RIOC1 (12;41}24'411 T'.4O aIFl�CTIO40.L PEAK TWO DIRECTIONAL PEAK All PE.AE HR 'I 6.1E at;o1 AM ro Da a1 AM PM - PE,Ak Hn Tt11E. D3.45 PM ro 04.45 I'M AFF PFU HR ,21 I ME 761 1119 1980 PR PEAK HR VOLIMME 1003 938 1699 AIF- K ""-AL:I (W.. 1 'o 132 PLA - K rAITOPI 1%l 7 99 AM D 1'^:•', .... .. ...........................................----- JIb 48 513.52 ----- ,60.013 ---. PF! D 1%) - ..- U 11.2 ----- 471.8 -- WOW N4'5 (;IJ:\dMl, I EH I'f HV11) ;1''31-1 'i {III GHFT. t2.Hf1 24-11n PEM005 Din 1 0" 2 Taka1 Iry',AL. FY AK AV 8 -HP PERIOD Ir3F.'no 12.m01 4.0170 6'6'0 9,610 PF,Ak -IR T'61F na-W PRm 03,W PM AV I;,Ha FFRRII"1 :611115 1T441 A.Z%7 6,3""1 1+7.644 PEAK -IR VOLUME 924 942 18a2 PW 6 -HR PEF91OD I I Z_101 B.0O3 5,792 5,046 1D,030 DIRE CTIONAL PEAK PM 12 -HR PER IDD• 12171''2 A 1701 4,462 6,575 15.D37 P1EAA4 HTi TM4E 200 PM to bi 011 P69 09'45 AM ro 10.45 AM 2d tsDuF1 KAV) 12 749 12,932 25.Ea F PEAK Hai VOLU16% 11112 957 D {Wj ADAA 5x76 100.00 Run Date: 2017108108 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2015 Silo 10, 671KI11243$ Rauh No: 11 Date From: 2016.+05f09 0:44 Town; Hawaii DIFection; 4AP 021te To: 2016.05104 23:45 Location: Queen Kashumartu Hwy - Hualalai Rd to Nenl Kailua Or Functional Classifiaatmn- 14 U R 8 AN -P RINCI PAL ARTERIAL - OT14ER REPORT TOTALS - 48 HOURS RECORDED Bus SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A -6T 3A -SU 4A -SU SINGLE -TRAILER TRUCKS 4A -5T 5A -ST 6A -ST MULTI -TRAILER TRUCKS 5A -MT 6A -MT 7A -MT HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS HEAVY VEHICLES VOLUME 7V7 NUMBER QF AXLES Cycles 338 0.6695 6T7 PC 35846 6%91' 71692 2A -4T 14198 27.6995 28396 LIGHT VEH1CLE TOTALS 50382 98-259'. 100765 Bus SINGLE UNIT TRUCK 2A -6T 3A -SU 4A -SU SINGLE -TRAILER TRUCKS 4A -5T 5A -ST 6A -ST MULTI -TRAILER TRUCKS 5A -MT 6A -MT 7A -MT HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS HEAVY VEHICLES 0.17311. 7V7 234 0.46% 585 157 0.31% 314 145 0.28% 433 31 0.061%. 124 153 0.3 [1°/6 612 95 0,19% 475 31 0.06% 186 T4 0.17311. 7V7 1 9,00% 8 33 0,060/6431 HOUR -------------------------------------------------- 894 1.74% 3039 CLASSIFIE=D VEHICLES TOTALS UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS AXLE CORRECTION FACTon (A.c) = C 989 51277 (A) 1 W.01)% 1038Q3 (B) 1 0,00% R13AOTUSE EQUIVALENT(BIZ) = 51901 (C) cv. rr%rka HPMS PEAK HOUR PEAT( PEAK 24 HOURK-FACTOR VOLUME : 1970 HOUR HOUR TRUCK % OF (PEAK AADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT (ITEM 06) 201E 05.+03 15.00 VOLUME 'aAQT SINGLE UNIT (55A-1) (55A -2j TRUCKS (TYPE 4-7) g3 1.63% 283 1,10°x. 7.64° 2580D COMBINATION (655-1) (6515-2) (TYPE 8-13) 27 1.379 163 0,63% 7.64% Appendix B Bus Route Schedule and Map m Aloittloy through Saturday _0 HLLo Ef-occZi �v 3,16.70 17 aP f:�5 51513 tit'M &-a-A K:a9 #,2fl I 6:30 6-45 7:311 --- --- -- &.3-3 6:0 6!44 7:04 5 DO j 845 J: s -do- 4:1UP 4:03 4:13 4:20 4:; 5 9-!;" 10.00 I orn11: 05 4f 9!$0 9,« lo: 00 to 'HonoU� a Cy%.m Corn rlc, a:lytj If! 3:45 5,40 4!1)0 4 ri Cyri CompbKn +45 4rt,�- 5-.1 � i I ippe r F;m rkin tM 10 -.45 10,20 4t, 71:fl: 14N,1)) F -JS SOLD MORNINGS 1 2'1 1 I.R) 1 1:40 1 i:50 j 7-ti5 2.;o 4t, 71:fl: 14N,1)) F -JS SOLD MORNINGS COUNITY' OF HAWAH MASS TR_ANSITAGENCY 961-8744 KONA TO HILIO BCS 5CHVD LE si Ill M—itr— is,n of rahen nnJ for sear *arms: I .tilnr1! .1 [11 I Iii swear ort, -l,urr,l N, Pal i,noldc. n0c,siieor lmi-c maxTini -. NcL SIIIt`Ln iI .t.L}iau3igKi}I1 nlfx,d Lt Li,' Lrdue 5. ]=7fpl't17K� n1 .-• or soctItIS- d. Tlsephyii , L"E r,KlLn�. Lapeplsy;ers-rh'd*yerL. a d till lil:o,w� Arc , ml,brcA Yw'Irhour li.adl,lkm . 1 ecfni, Ii Lnii Iw—cpLiyi n, . yelling ar xnikhig 1, -dlr v 1 l.• t .lb,,,, irp ,r, , 4M (tirnixlliled Ln,k-, IRior pen""'w'. I; L'I.n1 L1I: ;, Kxlt lnr.rti� y SUN) rhnlyru for ri,m (vvc%Tl wn,icr an. Lnm kZ Pn nidal t1h,, nru bpi in ae unrI—A vmn.Imer "r ravv Iw'Y 'SI' -1}4 6—g,, p,rr item lazurr tr,— If,"x II)'or m,yq 111411 nitt Willi 11144 4716711191 At mu&rm"l h S' --j rwpd. S1.004h.m-_t, for hkCvck 11. FLL4M&e11H tZI? eLs,L'c'ont d Il715 star z011¢5 w'11917; ., t,: How to hn.nd 6, h 1 ; -di nn,', ..Knr Sidc ol'tlte nvdwer fin flit 1441 •: 11 le„Le cAll I'Lx Inm swP _ . ..' LT.:.. I'LLli 11a.Acs d cuuLIaKe slop. r.., -'I I L L1 ,11 1 ,11,wL.4Mtiech q,Tp-Ar in r:. -.V, ',d I'll hgrL"T :x pings, cupiged in I icier thatsiWmra a,:4 rrlliLT Inw Lw reditu Ire. I1 1,•, Lif th, huv. I I•.: ,..v ymu < -., l -Pe1 n11` slat. ,all 1,c;ri ,, l,v 1h, u-wkiu L 4rlre bus. yNred. 1.11K.1 dk laia ed f ft Tu Ll —Iipknt> arp ]=kik IROI?I Ir. •. , L,,z [W.ul AV%JER-- 161 .Roar ,d Ha6s.li KM 1Wl he rr�l,arleihdm far al,}' rlera4 Yu0iellra, arilrolkGa. +,r I:Int;x,,L• i—lilciup from Mlle Mum I9 deparl or .tris. at L.LA Lb—, arfrr ity I&h- broaghc .h Ilk - 1,&e 1 hw1,&e1 fcc 71iorc iltror„idtifvlsliil I+xw hal tonbua o E'm.;:` 'nr 1od I'il-r�1sr ,wN Appendix C Analysis deports -- Existing Conditions (2019) HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2019 AM 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy---Y28f2019 Wvement ESL E=ST RR WK WBT til+WER RK NBT W2R SBL SB i SBR Lane ConfiquraGons ' tf tt tt r tt iN Traffic Volume (vehlh) 71 457 218 163 678 23 243 192 109 20 321 177 Future Volume (vehPh) 711 457 218 163 678 23 243 192 109 20 32" 177 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 D U 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1A0 1.00 1.00 100 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1737 1767 1737 1841 1811 1841 1841 1870 1856 1870 1674 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 72 466 O 166 692 0 248 196 D 20 328 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.93 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 161 1537 249 1656 344 780 40 504 ArrlVa On Green 0.05 0.46 0.00 0.07 0.48 O.OD 0.10 0.22 0.00 0.02 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3209 3357 1472 3441 3441 1` Q 3441 3554 1572 1781 3554 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 72 466 0 166 692 0 248 196 0 24 328 O Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1605 1678 1472 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.7 6.9 0.0 3.8 10.4 0.0 5.6 3.6 0.0 0.9 6.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 1.7 6.9 0.0 3.8 10.4 0.0 5.6 3.6 0.0 0.9 6.91 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 1,00 1 0o 1,OD 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh1h 161 1537 249 1656 344 784 40 504 VPC Ratin(X) 045 0.30 0.67 0.42 072 0.25 0.50 0.66 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehPh 251 1537 445 1656 613 2108 123 1714 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.174 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.40 1.00 0.04 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 366 13.5 0.0 35.8 1`3 4 O.D ?4.6 256 0.0 384 323 0.0 Inca Delay (d2), shah 1.9 0.5 0.0 3.1 0.8 O.0 2.8 0.2 0.0 9.3 1.5 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.4 0.0 00 4.0 O.D D.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 47.0 0,0 We t3ack=(50%),vahnn 0.7 2.5 0.0 16 38 O.D 24 15 0,0 0.5 3.0 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Nlay(d),sJveh 386 14.1 0.0 389 14.2 O.D 37.4 25.8 0.0 47.7 33.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 538 A 858 A 444 A 348 A Approach Delay, sfveh 17.3 18.9 32,3 34.5 Approach 'LOS B B O C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.3 21.9 10.3 40.9 12.5 15.7 8.5 42.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 47.9 10,4 34.0 14.3 38.3 6.2 36.2. Max 0 Clear Time (g_C+l1), s 2.9 5.6 5.8 8.9 7.6 8.9 3.7 12.4 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 1,3 0.2 3.1 0,5 2,2 0.0 4.9 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 2 .'7 HC'M 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 31.8 HGM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 93.3 Sum of lost tune (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 2019 AM 2; Henry St & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy c Ci itical Lane Group 1012812019 Movement EEIL EBT HR W9 WST W GR NQL NBT NRR S84. set S89 Lane CanfiquratIons ++ r t+ r 4t r I lt_� Traffic Volume (vph) 107 359 124 52 6W 457 146 337 42 362 339 124 Future Volume (vph) 107 359 124 52 600 467 146 337 42 362 339 124 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 19+3{7 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 19DO 19DO 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ut 1. Factor 0.97 0,95 1.00 0,97 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,94 091 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1,00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.99 1-00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.QD 1.00 1.00 103 1.130 1.00 1.013 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 100 1,00 085 100 1,00 0.85 1.00 1l,00 9.85 100 097 FItProtected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1M 0.95 0.99 Satd. How (prof) 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1545 1554 3310 1487 1595 3 17 4 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,0D 0.95 1.00 1.0D 095 0.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1487 1595 3174 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. HOW (vph) 110 370 128 54 619 481 151 347 43 373 349 128 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 86 0 0 336 0 0 35 0 23 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 110 370 42 54 619 145 136 362 8 283 544 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 2 2 4 3 3 4 Gonfl (likes. (#Ihr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (9i:) 13% 13% 5 6% 6% 3% 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.6 30.6 30.6 4.1 28.1 28.1 17.5 17.5 i7.5 23,1 23.1 EffecDve Green, g (s) 6.6 30.6 30.5 4.1 28.1 28.1 17.5 17.5 17.5 23.1 23.1 Actuated WC Ratio 0.07 0,33 01.33 4.04 030 0.30 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.25 0.25 Clearance Tinge (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap(vpb) 219 1076 497 145 1025 465 293 6127 278 394 786 Ws Ratio Prat x0.04 0.11 0.02 cO.18 0.09 c4.11 x,0.18 0.17 Os Hatie Perm 0.03 0.09 0.01 vto Ratio 4.50 034 0,48 037 0.60 0.31 0.46 0.58 0,03 0.72 069 Uniform Delay, di 41.8 23.7 21.7 43.3 27.8 25.1 33.7 34.5 31.0 32.1 31.9 Pragras8ion Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 lrlcremental Delay, d2 18 0.9 03 16 2.6 17 1.2 1,3 0.0 6.2 2.7 Delay (s) 43.6 24.6 22.0 45.0 30_5 26.9 34.9 35.8 31.0 38.3 34.6 Level Df Sarvice D C G ❑ C C C D G f] C Approach Delay (s) 27.5 29.7 35.2 36.8 Approach LOS C C D D llnb% otion Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.8 HGM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 93.3 Sum of lost tune (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 68 9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Pernod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2019 AM 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 10128019 totemectian Int N18y, slVeh 10.3 Movement EMI BAR NBL �' SST SBR t Lane Contiguralmns I r 0 0 + + r Tralfir, V431. u" 44 48 164 985 776 3t} Future Vol, vWh 44 48 164 985 775 30 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led - Free None -46 Yield Storage Length 140 0 650 426 0 700 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - It D - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 Mvmt Flaw 47 52 176 1059 834 32 t41Sj€ iwiiti[11`_ Minar2 MW1 ^Maj Conflicting Flea All 2246 835 0 0 Stage 1 835 - Stage 2 1411 Crltioal Hdwy (5.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver -46 0 798 Stage 1 426 0 - - Stage 2 2.25 0 - Platoen blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 797 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -36 - Stage 1 331 - Stage 2 225 - - - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Control Delay. F, $429 15 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlajar 4lunit NBL N13T ,BLn 1 FBLn2 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 797 :j6 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.221 s 14. HCM CanlmJ Delay {s} 10.8 a Oft^ 5 PGM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 0.8 11 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2019 AM 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 10128019 tritomeefion Int t7e18y, crush 3 3 Movement WWI W]313M13T N IBR 9BL 86T mml Lane Contiguralmns I Traffic, V{}I, v" 9 Future Vol, vWh 9 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 Sign Cantrol Stop RT Cbarinei Led 1006 Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 Grade. % 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Fkaw 10 i" 11� Major2 140 1016 15 73 748 140 1006 15 73 748 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Stop - Yield - None a - 0 - - 0 93 93 93 93 93 2 2 13 6 151 1082 16 75 804 mSjomlio milraYl Magi Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2050 10% 0 0 1082 0 Stage 1 10911 - - Stage 2 960 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 4.16 Critical I-idwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.518 3 318 2.254 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 61 262 630 Stage 1 322 - - - Stage 2 372 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 53 262 - - 630 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 53 - Stage 1 322 - Stage 2 326 - - - Approach we N8 SB H'IPA Con (raI Dalay. s 38 9 L 1 HCM LOS F MNor Laneg-AajarMvnit NRT flRR615i.n1WFjLn2 28L SRT Capacity (vetalh) - 53 262 630 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.183 0-575 4.125 HCU Carilml delay {s} - 87,5 35.8 115 f4CM Lane LDS F E B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 0.6 3.3 0.4 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Nage 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 AM 5; Puapueanui St 10128019 Movement C1 o ment Whir WIBR N8T NBR Sal. aT Lane CanfiquraGons r t I t Traffic Volume (+vehlh) 87 185 653 24 43 718 FLIkire Volume (vehih) 87 185 853 24 43 718 Initial Q (0b), vat', 0 0 0 0 a 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,DD Work Zane On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1656 1870 1870 1825 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 93 4 907 0 4G 764 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 3 2 2 5 Cap, vehlh 120 1409 65 1536 ArrlVa On Green 0.07 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.44 0.84 Sat Flow, vahPh 1781 1585 18x6 11585 1781 1826 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 93 0 907 0 46 764 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1781 1585 1856 1585 1781 1826 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.1 0.0 22.7 0.0 2.5 11.3 Cycle Q Clear(c,-c), s 5.1 0.0 22.7 0.0 2.5 11.3 Prop In Lane 100 r 00 100 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 120 1409 65 1W VPC Ratin6X) 078 0.64 0.71 0.5D Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 326 1409 117 1535 HOM Platoon maria 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1,00 Ono 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 45.3 O.D 5.6 0.0 470 2.1 Incr Delay (d2), shah 10.2 0.0 2.3 0.0 13.4 1.2 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 GO 0.0 0.0 O.D We l3ack=(50%),vah1ln 2.6 0.0 T5 00 14 2.4 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),sJveh 554 0.0 7.9 0.0 604 3.3 LoGrp LOS E A F A Approach Vol, vehlh 93 A 907 A 81 D Approach Delay, sfveh 55.4 7.9 8.5 Approach 'LOS E A A Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 79.4 87.5 11.1 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 6.5 72.0 83.D 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 4.5 241 13.3 7.1 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 9,3 7.0 0.1 Intersection Summary _ FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.7 HC'M 6th LOS A Notes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2019 AM 6: Kuakini Street 1028 019 tritemeethn Int t eiayr, sVveh Movement 7 7 EMI EBR NBL NBT 85T SBR Lane Contiguralmns I 0 0 + } r Tralfir, V431. vehth 7 169 517 MI 733 61 Future Vol, vWh 7 169 517 801 733 01 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stats Free Free Free Free RT CbannW4 Led • Free None Pot Gap- t Maneuver Yield Storage Length 160 0 630 Stage 1 448 700 Veh in Median Storage. # 0 - - 118 0 - Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 A 2 5 5 Stage 1 Mvmt F4ow 8 182 556 861 788 66 m9liarlM160 Nliw2 Y&1 Maj ort Conflicting Flew All 2761 788 0 0 Stage 1 788 Stage 2 1973 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy (5.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2 218 Pot Gap- t Maneuver 22 0 831 Stage 1 448 0 - - Stage 2 118 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -7 - 831 Mery Cap -2 Maneuver -7 Stage 1 148 Stage 2 118 Approach EB N B SB HIIPA ConEral Delay. S 1035 4 lJ 9 Ci HCM LOS F Minor LaneJl`-Aajar Mvnit h3BL 1113T EBLn 1 EBLn2 SBT 31313 Capacity (velalh) 831 7 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.669 1.075 HCM CrunFol Delay {s} 17 6 S 1035,A 0 - HCM Lane LDS C F A, HCM 95th %tile Giveh) a.3 1.7 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2019 AM T Lako Street 1012872019 � � � Movement ESL EBT SBR WILL WBT WHIR NSL NBT NBR SE $BT SSBR Lane COnfiquraGons t� 'k + r t Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 251 4B 65 69 36 267 33 792 55 141 647 125 Future Volume (vehPh) 251 48 69 69 36 267 33 792 55 141 f 47 125 Initial Q (0b), vah D 0 0 0 €l D 0 4 4 0 U D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,017 1.00 100 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1670 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1641 1811 1656 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 267 51 0 73 38 D 35 B43 D t5O 588 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.924 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap,vehlh 303 318 110 116 344 971 258 1016 ArrlVa On Green 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.06 0.06 4.00 0.03 0.52 0.00 0.06 0.55 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 15135 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 267 51 0 73 38 0 35 843 0 150 588 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh,4n 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 D 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 T585 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.0 2.2 0.0 3.9 t.9 0.0 0.9 37.7 0.0 3.8 25.5 0.0 Cycle Q C[ear(c,-c), s 14.0 2.2 D.0 3.9 1.9 0.0 0.9 37.7 G,.0 3.6 25.5 D.0 Prop In Lane 100 4,00 1 00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 303 318 110 116 344 971 258 1016 VPC Ratin(X) 0.88 0.18 0.66 0.33 010 0.87 0.56 0.68 Avail Cap(cw,a), vehPh 336 353 333 353 381 971 270 1416 HOM Platoon Ballo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0D 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 38.7 33.B 0.0 43.8 42.9 0,0 12,7 2(9.1 0.0 19.0 15.5 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 21.5 0.2 0.0 6.7 1_6. 0.0 0.1 10.4 0.0 2.9 3.6 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 4.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Sack=(0%),vahlln 7.8 1.0 0.0 1.9 0.9 0,0 03 17.5 0,0 17 110 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),slveh 602 34 1 0.0 50.5 445 0.0 12.8 30.4 0.0 21.9 19.2 O D LnGrp LOS C D D B C C B Approach Vol, vehlh 318 A 111 A 878 A 638 A Approach Delay, slveh 56.0 48.4 29.7 19.6 Approach 'LOS E D G B Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.2 54.1 20.7 7.5 56.6 10.4 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 45 4.5 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 6.4 49.6 16.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 5.8 39,7 16.0 2.9 27.5 5.9 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 4,4 0.2 0.0 51 0.2 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay X.6 HCM 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t t HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjon Summary 2019 AM 8; Kamehameha fill Road Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy/012812019 Movement BSL EBT RR -- UV9L WBT WER NGL H13T NBR SBL sea SE39 Lane CanfiquraGons 2 4 r 6 + 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 1 8.6 371 t 5.7 Traffic Volume (vehlh) 157 5 26 16 12 15 76 475 15 14 417 285 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 157 5 26 16 12 15 76 475 15 14 417 285 lnitial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.04 1,00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1,DD 1,00 1.00 1.000 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Na Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1722 1781 1781 1781 1752 1811 1611 1870 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 169 5 0 17 13 14 62 511 16 15 448 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.90 0.53 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 12 8 8 8 10 6 6 2 6 6 Cap.vehlh 230 7 26 20 24 103 933 29 32 11594 ArrlVa On Green 0.13 0.13 0.00 4.04 0.44 0.04 0.06 0.53 0.53 0.02 0.49 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1732 51 1459 598 467 563 1658 1745 55 1781 J532 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 174 0 0 46 0 0 82 0 527 15 448 0 Grp yak Ftow(s),vehlh,4n 1784 0 1459 1618 0 0 $668 0 180D 1781 1721 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.2 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 12.8 0.6 5.1 0.0 Cycle Q clear(c,-c), s 6.2 0.0 6.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 12.8 0.6 5.1 0,0 Prop In Lane 097 1,00 437 0.35 1.00 0.03 100 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 237 0 70 0 0 103 0 962 32 1690 VPC Ratin(X) 073 0.00 0.66 000 0.00 079 0.00 0.55 0- 46 0.27 Avail Cap(c..a), vehlh 6% 0 622 0 0 229 C 962 137 1690 HOM Platoon Ratio t_OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). slveh 277 O.0 0.0 31.3 0.0 0.0 30.7 0.0 10.2 32 3 99 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 4.4 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0 2.2 9.9 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 GO GO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We Back=(0%),vahnn 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 43 0.3 1.6 0.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),sheh 32.0 0.0 00 41.4 0,0 0.0 43.5 0.0 12.4 42.2 10.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Approach Vol, vehlh 174 A 46 609 463 A Approach Delay, sfveh 32.0 41.4 16.6 11.3 Approach 'LOS C D B B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.3 8.6 371 7.4 5.7 40.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,5 4.5 45 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 25.9 i:1.1 31.5 25.5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 8.2 �.2 7.1 3.9 2.6 14.8 Green Ext Time (p o), s 0.8 0.0 27 0.2 0.0 3.0 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 17.7 HC'M 6th LOS B Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2019 PM 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 1000 wvement EpL EBT RR WK WBT WEIR NK NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane COnfiquraGons ++ r tt iff tt r tt Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 260 877 503 223 609 41 227 283 247 51 313 107 Future Volume (vehPh) 260 877 503 223 609 41 22 ?.ft3 247 5' 3"3 107 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D u 0 0 4 0 D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.136 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.40 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,40 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 18561 1856 1670 1870 1841 1870 1856 1870 1670 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 265 895 0 228 621 D 232 289 0 52 319 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0'W 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.48 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 357 1578 316 1521 319 991 76 512 ArrlVa On Green 0.10 4.45 0.00 4.09 4.43 0.00 0.09 0.19 0.00 0.04 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3428 3526 1585 3456 3497 1585 3428 ,35 4 1585 1781 X554 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 265 895 0 228 621 0 232 289 D 52 319 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 1777 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.0 15.1 0.0 5.2 9.8 0.0 5.3 5.7 0.0 2.3 6.8 0.0 Cycle Q clear(c,-c), s 6.0 15.1 11).0 9.2 9.8 0.0 5.3 5.7 0.0 2.3 6.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 1,40 1.00 1.40 1,04 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 357 1578 316 1521 319 691 76 512 VPC Ratin6X) 074 0.57 0.72 0.41 073 0.42 0.68 0.62 Avail Cap(c..a), vehlh 533 1578 451 1521 448 1538 197 1767 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.0D 1.00 1.001 1.01) 1.00 1.174 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.08 1.00 0.00 1.04 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 35.0 16.5 0.0 35.5 15.6 0.0 35.5 28.4 00 38.0 324 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 3.1 1.5 0.0 3.2 01.8 0.0 3.6 0.4 0.01 10.3 1.2 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 We Back=(0%),vahnn 2.6 5.9 0.0 2.2 3.8 0.D 2.3 2.4 0'0 1.2 29 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),sJveh 380 37.9 0.0 388 16.4 0.0 39.1 288 01.0 48.3 33.6 0.4 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 1160 A 849 A 52.1 A 371 A Approach Delay, sfveh 22.5 22.4 33.4 35.7 Approach 'LOS C C C D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 20.2 11.8 40.5 12.0 16.1 12.9 39.5 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 8.9 41.6 10.5 3.6.0 14.5 44.0 12.5 34.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 4.3 7.7 7.2 17.1 7.3 13.3 8.0 11.8 Green Ext Time (p c), s 00 2.0 0.2 6.0 0,2 2.2 0.4 4.2 Intersection Summary FILM 0th Ctrl Delay 26.1 HC'M 5th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for jNBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 32.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.5 Sum of lost tint (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 2019 PM 2; Henry St & Q:jeer Kaahumanu Hwy c Ci itical Lane Group 1092862019 - .-.-. --v - t +i Movement F-i3L EBT M WK VAST WGR NDL NBT NRR SP4. SBT SM Lane ConfiquratIons tf r ff r 4t r 1 4-� Traffic Volume (vph) 190 61K 299 72 548 314 126 318 34 348 342 150 Future Volume (vph) 190 663 291 72 548 314 128 318 34 348 342 150 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 19017 19013 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 19M 19DO 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ut 1. Factor 4,97 0,95 1,00 097 0.995 1,00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,94 091 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 0-99 1.00 1,00 D.98 1-00 0.99 Flpb, ped9bikes 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 I.00 1.00 1.170 1.00 1.00 1.09 Fd 1.00 1,00 085 1.90 1,00 0,85 1.00 1I,aa a.85 100 095 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd.How (prof) 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1610 3193 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.910 1.00 01.95 1.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 3335 35.39 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1610 3193 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 D.98 0.98 0.98 0.58 Adj. HOW (vph) 194 677 297 73 559 320 129 324 35 355 349 194 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 197 0 0 228 0 0 29 0 47 D Lane Group Flow (vph) 194 577 100 73 559 92 116 337 6 302 549 0 Conti. Peds (#Ihr) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Conil (likes. (#Ihr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (95) 5% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prat NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8:6 32.5 32.3 3.9 27.6 27.6 16,9 16.9 16.9 24.4 24.4 EffecDve Green, g (s) 8.6 32.3 32.3 3.9 27.8 27.6 15.9 16.9 16.9 24.4 24.4 Actuated gfC Ratio 0.09 034 0,34 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.18 0,18 0,16 0.26 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extensian (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.9 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap (vpb) 300 1198 535 140 1003 451 282 x138 271 411 815 Ws Ratio Prat x0.06 c0.19 0.D2 0.16 0.07 c0.10 W-19 0.17 Os Matic Perm 006 0.06 9.00 Wo Ratio 4.65 0.57 0.19 0.52 0,56 0.21 0.41 0.56 0,02 0.73 0.67 Uniform Delay, di 42.0 25.9 22.3 44.9 28.8 25.7 34.9 35.9 32.5 32.6 32.0 Pragrascion Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.04 lrncremental Delay, d2 47 1.9 0.8 35 2.2 1,D 10 12 0.0 6,7 2.2 Delay (s) 46.7 27.8 23.1 46.4 31.0 26.7 35.9 37.1 32.5 39.3 34.2 Level of Sarvice d C C D C C D D c f] C Approach Delay (s) 29.8 30.9 36.5 36.9 Approach LOS C C D D llnb% otiorl Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.5 Sum of lost tint (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 72.7' ICU Level of Sarvioe C Analysis Peiod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2619 PM 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 10128019 tritomeiciinn Int Mayr, slveh Movement 1ML ESR NOL NBT 85T SBR Lane Conliguralmns I r + + r Tr r, V43I, u" 10 70 84 323 1005 17 Future Vol, vWh 10 TO 84 923 1005 17 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 6 Sign Cantrat Stop Stats Free Free Free Free RT CbarinWLed • Free None Yield ,Storage Length 140 0 650 Approach 700 Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 - - 1} 0 - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 Mvmt Fkaw 10 72 87 952 1036 16 1073 0 f4CM Lane LDS B Conflicting Flow All 2162 HCM 95th %tiler € lNeh) 1036 0 0 Stage 1 1036 Stage 2 1126 - - - - - Critioal Hdwy (5.42 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy 1518 - 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 52 0 671 Stage 1 342 0 - - Stage 2 310 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 45 - 671 Mery Cap -2 Maneuver 45 Stage 1 296 Stage 2 310 Approach EB N9 SB 1-111PA Contral Delay, s 1073 0 g 0 HCM LOS F M Nor Lanelhflaj;dr Mvnit NBL N8T EBL.n 1 FBI -n2 SET SBR Capacity (vetalh) 671 45 - HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.129 0.229 HCU GartFol Delay {s} It 2 1073 0 f4CM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tiler € lNeh) 0.4 0.8 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2619 PM 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 10128019 tritomeethn Int N18yr, slveh 1 7 Movement W13 WBR NBT NBR SBL 5BT Lane Contiguralians I 1� Traffic, V{}I, v" 14 71 940 4 61 1016 Future Vol, vWh 14 71 940 4 61 1015 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Frea RT Cbarinei Led - Stop Yield - None Storage Length 4 a 0 - Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 Mvmt Fkaw 14 73 965 4 63 1046 m9liarIM1140^ _ milt'1 _ VIajorI Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2143 971 0 ce-p Stage 1 971 - Stage 2 1172 - Critioal Hdwy 6.47 5,22 413 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.47 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.47 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.563 3.318 2.272 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 52 307 688 Stage 1 360 - - - Stage 2 288 - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 47 301" - - 688 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 47 Stage 1 360 Stage 2 262 - Approach WB N9 SB H'IPA Contra Delay. s 356 a 06 HCM LOS F M Nor Laneg-Aajar Mvnit NBT °Nth ,BLn1VWBLn2 SBL T Capacity (vetalh) - 47 307 688 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.307 0.238 0.091 HCU Garilrol Delay {s} - 112.5 20.4 10.8 f4CM Lane LDS F C 6 HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 1-1 4.9 0.3 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 PM 5; Puapuaanui St 10128 019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR 58L GBT Lane CanfiquraGons r f r I + Traffic Volume (vehlh) 34 107 825 48 132 906 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 34 107 825 48 132 M Initial Q (0b), Vats 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.04 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No Plo Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1870 1825 1656 1841 1870 187D Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 35 4 851 0 136 034 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.87 0.97 0.97 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 2 5 3 4 2 2 Cap, vehlh 57 1358 168 1634 ArT[Va On Green 0.03 0.00 C.73 0.00 0.09 0.87 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 35 0 851 0 136 934 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1547 1$56 1660 1781 1870 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.8 0.0 21.5 0.0 7.1 12.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 1.8 0.0 21.6 0.0 7.1 12.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 100 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 57 1358 168 1634 VPC Ratin(X) 0 fit 0.63 0.81 0.57 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehPh 337 1358 253 1634 HOM Platoon Rabo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 O.W 1,00 000 1.00 1.DD Uniform Delay (d). slveh 45.4 0.0 6.3 0.0 42.2 1 5 Inca Deiay (d2), shah 10.5 0.0 2.2 00 111.0 1.5 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.D We Back=(50%),vah1ln 1.0 0.0 7.4 00 3.6 1.5 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Dulay(d),slveh 560 0.0 8,5 0.0 53 1 3.0 LoGrp LOS E A D A Approach Vol, vehlh 35 A 851 A 1070 Approach Delay, sfveh 56.0 8.5 9.4 Approach 'LOS E A A Turner - Assigned 'Plan 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.5 74.0 87.5 7.5 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 Max Green Sating (Gmax), s 13.5 65.0 83.0 16.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 9.1 23.6 14.0 3.8 Green Ext Time (p o), s 0.1 8,1 10.2 0.0 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay a HCM 6th LOS A Notes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th TWSC 2019 PM 6: Kuakini Street 1028 019 tritemeethn Int N18y, slveh 2 8 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT S5T SBR Lane Contiguralmns I ? 0 0 + + r Traffic, V{}I, v" 13 372 243 854 887 36 Future Vol, vWh 13 372 243 854 887 36 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 4 0 0 4 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free FreC- Frea RT CbarinW Led - Free - None 43 Yield Storage Length 160 0 630 385 0 700 Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 - - It 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % S 2 2 3 2 5 Mvmt Fkaw 13 384 248 871 905 37 m4ormi ol`� Mim2 Ma 11 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2272 505 0 0 Stage 1 905 Stage 2 1367 - - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.48 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.48 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.48 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 43 4 752 Stage 1 385 0 - - Stage 2 234 4 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 29 - 752 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 29 Stage 1 258 Stage 2 230 Approach EB N9 SB HCt'A Contral Delay. s 208 2 27 D HCM LOS F M NorLaneg-Aaj;dr'ylunit NBL lQT' B n1 F-BLn2 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 752 29 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.33 0.457 HCM Carilml Delay {s} 12 1 208.2 5 f4CM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tiler € lNeh) 1.4 1.11 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjarl Summary 2019 PM T Lako Street 10Y2$J201 0- --* 1- *- 'I - Movement ESIL EBT RR Wyk. WBT WEE N8L NSA" NPR SBL SBT SEAR Lane CanfiquraGons - ' t r t Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 127 30 46 fit 39 193 37 754 64 181 877 170 Future Volume (vehPh) 127 30 48 fit 39 193 37 754 64 1:81 877 170 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,40 1.40 1,00 1,00 1:00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,OD Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1841 1870 1870 1870 1826 1825 1856 1856 1870 1855 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 132 31 0 65 41 D 39 785 D 189 914 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.% 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap.vehlh 173 184 102 104 277 1050 373 1119 ArrlVa On Green 0.10 0.10 0.00 4.06 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.57 O.DD 0.07 0.60 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1751 1 6 1565 1767 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 132 31 0 65 41 0 39 785 0 189 914 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1753 1870 D 1781 1626 0 1767 1856 M5 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.3 1.3 0.0 3.0 1.6 0.0 0.8 27.2 0.0 3.7 32.8 0.0 Cycle Q clear(c,-c), s 6.3 1.3 4.0 30 La 0.4 0.8 27..2 0,0 3.7 32.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 0.00 1 Go 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 173 184 102 104 277 1050 373 1119 VPC Ratin(X) 076 0.17 4.64 0.39 014 0.75 0.51 0.82 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 370 395 376 385 318 1054 426 1119 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.174 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0D 1.00 100 0.00 1.00 1.017 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 37.5 35.2 0.0 39.4 38.8 0,D 126 139 00 12.4 13.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 6.9 0.4 0.0 6_6 2.4 0.4 0.2 4.9 0.0 1.1 6.7 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 O.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We Back=(50%),vahlln 3.0 0.6 0.0 15 014 O.D D 3 115 0,D 13 13.9 0,0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),sJveh 44.3 35,7 O.D 45.9 41.2 O.D 1.2.8 188 0.0 13.5 20.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D B B B C Approach Vol, vehlh 163 A 106 A 824 A 1143 A Approach Delay, shah 42.7 44.1 18.5 19.0 Approach 'LOS D D B B Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 52.7 12.9 7.5 55.5 9.4 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.3 47.7 16.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 5.7 29.2 8.3 2.8 34.8 5.0 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 5.6 03 0.0 6-6 0.2 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 21.8 HC'M 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjon Summary 2019 PM 8; Kamehameha fill Road & Queen Kaahumarlu Hwy 10128019 Movement rM EST RR UV9L WRT WHIR NOL NBA" NBR SEIL SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r + T+ +T Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 290 11 52 7 11 1s 64 495 11 17 511 264 FLltkire Volume (vehPh) 290 11 52 7 11 18 64 495 11 17 511 284 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1,OD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,06 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Na Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1767 1767 1811 1870 1870 18713 1856 1856" 1856 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 305 12 0 7 12 10 67 521 12 1s 538 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.05 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 9 9 6 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 364 14 11 20 31 &9 862 20 37 1592 ArirVa On Green 0.22 0.22 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.48 4.43 0.02 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1622 64 1535 313 537 851 1757 1806 42 1781 3647 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 317 0 0 38 0 0 67 0 533 is 538 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1686 0 1535 1702 0 0 1767 0 1848 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 13.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 15.8 D.7 7.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 13.4 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 0,11) 15.8 07 7.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 096 1.00 0 18 0,50 1.00 0.02 1 00 0,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 378 0 62 O D 89 0 862 37 1592 VPC Ratin(X) 084 0.00 0.61 000 0.00 075 0.00 0.80 0.46 0.34 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 584 a 580 0 0 168 0 882 122 1592 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 111 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 100 000 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 277 0.0 0.0 35.5 0.0 0.0 351 0.0 14.3 36.2 134 00 Inca Deiay (d2), shah 6.4 0.0 0.0 9.4 0.0 0.0 12.1 0.0 3.1 9.5 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.17 0.0 We 13ack=(50%),vahnn 58 0.0 0.0 08 0.0 O.D 14 0,0 62 0,4 26 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 341 0.0 O.D 44.9 0,0 0.0 47.2 0.0 17.4 45.7 140 0 D LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Approach Vol, vehlh 317 A 38 500 556 A Approach Delay, sfveh 34.1 44.9 20.7 15.0 Approach 'LOS C D C B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 21.3 8.3 38.0 7.2 6.1 40.2 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 25.9 7.1 33.5 25.5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 15.4 4.8 9.4 3.6 2.; 17.8 Green Ext Time (p o), s 1,4 0.0 3.3 0.1 0.0 2,9 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 22.0 HCM 6th LOS C Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 Appendix D Analysis Reports —f=uture Without Project Conditions (2024) HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjon Summary 2024 AM WO 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 10012019 , 1- *- t J* t Wvement E9L EST RR Wilk. WBT WEIR NK NBT NER SBL SB i SBR Lane CanfiquraGons tf r tf r tt r tt r Traffic Volume (vehlh) 75 480 225 171 713 24 255 202 115 21 337 186 Future Volume (vehPh) 75 480 2.29 171 713 24 255 282 115 21 337 186 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1A0 1.00 1.OQ 100 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1737 1767 1737 1841 1811 1841 1841 1870 1656 1873 1874 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 77 490 0 174 728 D 260 206 D 21 344 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 164 1512 257 1634 355 807 41 518 ArrlVa On Green 0.05 0.46 0.00 0.08 0.47 0.00 0.10 0.23 0.00 0.02 0.15 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1` 0 3401 3504 1572 1781 3554 1565 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 77 490 D 174 728 0 260 206 0 21 344 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1605 1678 1472 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 7.6 0.0 4.0 11.3 0.0 6.0 3.8 0.0 0.9 7.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 1.9 7.6 4.0 4.0 11.3 0.0 6.0 3.8 0.0 0.9 7.4 4.0 Prop In Lane 100 100 100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 164 1512 257 1634 355 807 41 518 VPC Ratin(X) 047 0.32 0.68 0.45 073 0.26 0.51 0.66 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 247 1512 440 1634 605 2081 122 1692 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01? 1.00 1.170 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.011 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). slush 371 14.2 0.0 36.2 141 0,0 ";4,9 25.5 0.0 38.8 325 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s}vsh 2.1 0.6 0.0 3.1 0.9 0.0 2.9 0.2 0.0 9.2 1.5 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 D.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0,0 We t3ack=(50%),vahlln 0.8 2.8 0.0 17 4.2 0,0 26 1.6 0 D 0 5 32 0,0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl slveh 39.2 14.8 0.0 393 14.9 O.D 37.8 26.7 0.0 48.1 34.0 0,0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 567 A 502 A 466 A 365 A Approach Delay, sfveh t6.1 19.6 32,5 34.8 Approach 'LOS B B C C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 22.8 10.6 40.7 12.9 16.2 8.6 42.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4,5 4.5 4.5 45 4,5 45 4,5 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 5.5 47.9 10,4 34.0 14.3 38.3 6.2 38.2 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 2.9 5.8 6.0 9.6 8.0 9.4 3.9 13.3 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 1,4 02 3.3 0,5 2,4 0.0 5.2 Intersection Summary FILM 0th Ctrl Delay 14.3 HC'M 6th LOS Butes Unsrgaalized Delay for jNBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 32.9 HCM 2700 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 94.9 Surn of lost G in (s) 18.0 2024 ANI WO 2; Henry St & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 15 c Ci itical Lane Group iQP28f2D19 Wvemont EK EBT HR W9 WST tiWER NQL NBT N8R SBL SBT SRO Lane 0011fiquratI0119 tf r tf r 4t r 1 4_� Traffic Volume (vph) 112 077 130 55 631 491 153 354 44 380 356 130 Future Volume (vph) 112 3�7 130 55 631 491 153 354 4d 38D 356 130 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1904 19DO 1900 19W Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ut 1. Factor 0.97 0,95 1.Q0 097 0.95 1,0D 0.91 4.91 1.00 0,94 491 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 G.99 1.00 t.00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.99 1-00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.430 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 100 1,00 085 100 t 00 0.85 1.00 i3OO 6.85 100 097 Flt Protected 0.95 1.110 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.010 1M 0.95 0.99 Satd. How (prof) 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1554 3345 1487 t595 3 17 4 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,0D 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 0.99 Satd. Flaw (,perm) 3099 3282 1515 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1487 1595 3174 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. HOW (vph) 115 3B9 134 57 651 505 158 365 45 092 367 134 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 91 0 0 356 a 0 36 0 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 389 43 57 651 150 142 381 9 298 573 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 2 2 4 3 3 4 Gonfl Bikes. (#Ihr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (9taj 13°x6 13% 5 6% 6% 3% 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm: Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 6 2 2 6 6 Permftled Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.6 X6 30.6 4.1 28.1 28.1 18.1 18.1 18.1 24.1 24.1 EffecDve Green, g (s) 6.6 30.5 347.6 4.1 28.1 28.1 18.1 18.1 18.1 24.1 24.1 Actuated WC Ratio 0-07 0,32 0.32 0.04 0,30 0,30 0.19 0,19 0.19 0.25 0.25 Clearance Tinge (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extensian (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.09 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 215 1058 488 142 1008 455 298 636 283 405 8016 Ws Ratio Prat x0.04 0.12 0.02 cO.19 0.09 c0.11 x,0.19 0.18 Os Putin Perm. O.Q3 (1.10 0.01 Wo Ratio 4.53 0.37 0,09 040 0.65 0.33 0.48 0.60 0.03 0.74 0111 Uniform Delay, di 42.7 24.7 22.4 44.2 29.1 26.0 34.2 35.1 31.3 32.5 32.2 Pragres8ion Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 1.00 1.00 1,00 1_001 100 lrlcremental Delay, d2 2.5 1.0 0,4 19 3.2 1,9 1.2 1,5 0.0 63 3.0 Delay (s) 45.2 25.7 22.8 4•'6.1 32.3 27.9 35.4 36.6 31.3 39.3 35.2 Level of Sarvice D C C ❑ C C D D C D D Approach Delay (s) 28.6 31.1 35,9 36.6 Approach LOS C C D D llnb% otion Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.9 HCM 2700 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,65 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 94.9 Surn of lost G in (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 70.0'x, ICU Level of Sarvioe C Analysis Peiod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 AM WO 3: Hualalai Fid (North)_10128019 tritemeictinn Int N18y, sVveh 14 1 Movement EMI 11313 NBL N 13 S13T SBR 1 Lane Contiguralmns j 878 0 0 Stage 1 878 Tralfir, V431. u" 46 50 172 1035 815 32 Future Vol, vWh 46 50 172 1035 315 32 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Cantrat Stop Stats Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led • Free None Pat Gap -1 Maneuver -39 Yield Storage Length 140 0 650 Stage 1 406 0 700 Veh in Median Storage. # 0 - - It D - Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 Mvmt Fkaw 49 54 185 1113 877 a4 mom_ .. MiNr2�M1 � Major2� Conflicting Flow All 2361 878 0 0 Stage 1 878 Stage 2 1483 - - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver -39 0 769 Stage 1 406 0 - - Stage 2 208 0 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -30 - 768 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -30 - Stage 1 308 Stage 2 208 - - - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Con Ira I Delay. sI 5C3 1 16 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlajar 4lunit NEL NBT E Kn 1 FBLn2 SIFT SBR Capacity (vetalh) 768 30 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.241 4c; HCM CanlmJ Delay {s} 112 tis 60-5 1 5 PGM Lane LDS B F r" HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 0.9 ' .7 Notes Volume excaeds capacity 5� Delay Gxceeas 30OF + C: impotatian Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 AM WO 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 10128019 totemeiethn Int N18y, slveh 4 Movement WWI W]313 NET Nl8R 8BL NSBT Lane Contiguralmns T). Traffic, V{}I, vetti(h 9 Future Vol, vWh 9 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 Sign Cantrol Stop RT Cllarrr>ei Led 1057 Storage Length 0 Veh in Median gage; # 0 Grade. % 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Fkaw 10 i" T). �Major2 147 1057 16 77 796 147 1057 16 77 786 0 0 4 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Stop Yield - None a - 0 - - 0 - - 93 93 93 93 93 2 2 13 6 158 1137 17 83 845 I414o1'fH111ioMinorl _KUW1 �Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2157 1146 0 0 1137 6 Stage 1 1146 - Stage 2 1011 - - - - Critioal Hdwy (5.42 6.22 - 4.16 Critical I-idwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.254 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 52 243 600 Stage 1 303 - - - Stage 2 362 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 45 243 - - 640 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 45 Stage 1 303 - Stage 2 303 - - - Approach we N9 SB H'IPA Con (raI Dalay. s 47 3 0 1 1 HCM LOS F MNor Laneg-AajarMvnit NRT flRRW5' n1WFsLn2 26L SET Capacity (vehih) - 45 243 600 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.215 4.65 0.138 HCM CanlmJ delay {s} - 105.7 43.7 12 - HCM Lane LDS F E B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 0.7 4 0.5 - 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Nage 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 AM WO 5; Puapuaanui St 10128019 Movement WILL WBR NBT NBR SBL S8T Lane CanfiquraGons r f r I t Traffic Volume (+vehlh) 91 194 897 25 45 755 FLIkire Volume (vehih) 9 194 897 25 45 755 Initial Q (0b), vat', 0 0 0 0 0 D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1570 1826 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 97 0 954 D 48 803 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 3 2 2 5 Cap, vehlh 125 1404 136 1532 ArrlVa On Green 0.07 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.04 0.84 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1585 1856 1585 1781 1826 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 97 0 954 0 48 8D3 Grp Sat Flow(s),ueh/un 1781 158- 1856 1585 1781 1826 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.3 0.0 25.5 0.0 2.6 12.5 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 5.3 0.0 25.5 00 2.6 12.5 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 t 00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 125 1404 66 1532 VPC Ratin(X) 078 0.68 0.73 0.52 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehPh 324 1404 117 1532 HOM Platoon lube 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.01) Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1,00 Ono 1.04 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). aNeh 45.2 O.D 6.0 0.0 47.1 2.3 Inca Delay (d2), shah 9.9 0.0 2.7 0.0 14.1 1.3 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We l3ackD1 (0%),vahnn 2.7 0.0 8.5 00 1.4 2.6 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),sJveh 155.2 0.0 8.7 0.0 61.3 3.6 LnGrp LOS E A E A Approach Vol, vehlh 97 A 954 A 851 Approach Delay, sfveh 55.2 87 6.8 Approach 'LOS E A A Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 79.3 87.5 11.4 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 6.5 72.0 83.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 4.5 27.5 14.5 7.3 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 10,2 T6 0.1 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.2 HC'M 6th LOS B Notes Unergaalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 AM WO 6: Kuakini Street 10128019 tritemeefion Int N18y, slveh Movement 9.8 EMI BAR NBL NBT 85T SBR Lane Contiguralmns I r 0 + + r Tralfir, V431. v" 7 178 543 842 770 64 Future Vol, vWh 7 178 543 842 770 54 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Leed • Free None Pat Gap -1 Maneuver Yield Storage Length 160 0 630 Stage 1 429 700 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 105 0 - Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 03 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 4 2 5 5 rf Mvmt Fkaw 8 191 584 905 828 69 m9liarI1160 ._. Miw2 M1 ^Majorr2 Conflicting Flew All 2901 828 0 0 Stage 1 828 Stage 2 2073 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy (5.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 17 0 803 Stage 1 429 0 - - Stage 2 105 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -5 - 803 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -5 Stage 1 117 Stage 2 105 - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Coil Ira I Delay, S 1541; 3 8 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlajar 'ylunii NEIL NST EKn 1 FBI -n2 SBT SRR Capacity (vetalh) 803 5 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.727, 1.505 HCM CanllmJ Delay {s} 204 S 1546.3 HCM Lane LDS C F HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 6.5 1.8 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2024 AM WO T Lako Street 10012019 Movement HIL EBT RR Wit, WBT WHIR NaL NBA" NRR M SBT SBR Lane CCnfiquraGons t� 1 t r I t Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 364 50 73 73 38 281 35 832 58 148 680 131 Future Volume (vehPh) 264 50 73 73 38 281 35 832 58 148 680 131 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.0c 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,OD Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 187D 1870 1570 1641 1811 1656 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 281 53 0 78 40 D 37 885 D 157 723 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 4.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap.vehlh 314 330 115 122 313 955 225 1003 ArrlVa On Green 0.18 4.18 0.00 4.07 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.51 C.00 0.06 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 156D 1725 1x356 1W Grp Volume(v), vehlh 281 53 0 78 40 0 37 $85 0 157 723 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 D 1781 1870 1500 1725 1856 1565 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.0 2.3 0.0 4.2 2.0 0.0 0.9 42.7 0.0 4.1 28.5 0.0 Cycle Q clear(c,-c), s 15.01 2.3 4.0 4.2 2.0 0.0 0.9 42.7 0..0 4.1 285 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 0.00 104 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 314 3.30 115 122 313 955 225 1003 VPC Ratin(X) 08.9 0.18 0.68 0.33 012 0.93 070 072 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 330 347 328 347 346 955 231 1003 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1 00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 f1.(0 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 391 33.9 0.0 44.4 43.3 0.0 13.9 22 1 00 21.5 158 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 24.6 0.2 0.0 67 1.5 0.0 0.2 16.4 0.0 8.7 4.5 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(0%),vahlln 8.6 111 0.0 20 1.0 0.0 04 216 0D 23 126 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),sJveh 63.7 34.1 0.0 51 1 44.3 0-4 14 1 380 0.0 30.1 213 0 D LnGrp LOS C D D B D i, C Approach Vol, vehlh 334 A 118 A 922 A 880 A Approach Delay, shah 59.0 49.0 37.1 22.9 Approach 'LOS E. D D C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 54.1 21.6 7-7 57.D 10.8 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.4 49.6 16.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 6.1 44.7 17.0 2.9 30.5 6.2 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2.7 0.1 0.0 5.2 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay :35.4 HC'M 6th LOS D Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page 11 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjon Summary 2024 AM WO 8; Kamehameha fill Road & Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy 1012812419 Movement rM EST RR WK WBT WER NOL NST N2R SBL S13i SM Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r T+ tl Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 165 5 27 17 13 1t} 80 499 16 15 438 300 Future Volume (vehPh) 165 5 27 17 13 15 80 499 16 15 438 300 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.01] 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 122 1781 1781 1781 1752 1811 1811 1870 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate. vehJh 177 5 4 18 14 17 86 537 17 16 471 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 12 8 8 8 10 n 6 2 6 6 Cap, vehlh 239 7 27 21 25 106 924 29 34 1665 ArrlVa On Green 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.04 0.44 0.04 0.06 0.53 0.5:3 0.02 0.4$ 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1735 49 1459 595 462 582 1668 1745 55 1781 432 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 182 0 4 49 0 D 86 0 554 16 471 0 Grp yak Flow(s),vehlhlln 1784 0 1459 1618 0 0 1668 0 1800 1781 1721 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 14.0 4.6 5.5 0.0 Cycle Q clea(cg-r), s 6.6 0.0 0.0 2.0 OL 0.0 3.4 0,0 14.0 0.6 5.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.9: 1.00 027 0.35 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 245 4 72 0 0 108 0 953 34 1%5 VPC Ratin(X) 074 0.00 0.68 000 0.00 079 0.00 0.58 0.47 0.28 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 689 0 616 0 0 226 0 953 136 1665 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 111 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 100 000 0.00 1.00 0,00 000 1,00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). slveh 277 0.D 0 D 31.5 0,0 0.0 30.9 0.0 10.7 32.5 103 0.0 Inca Deiay (d2), shah 4.3 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.01 0.0 12.2 0.4 2.6 9.5 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 &0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O'D We Back=(0%),vahnn 30 0.0 0,0 10 0.0 0.D 16 00 4.8 03 17 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Dulay(d),sheh 32.0 0.0 0.0 42 t 0.0 0.0 43 1 0.0 133 42.1 10.8 0,0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Approach Vol, vehlh 182 A 49 640 487 A Approach Delay, sfveh 32.0 42.1 17.3 11.8 Approach 'LOS C D B B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.8 8.9 36.9 7.5 5.8 40.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 45 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.9 9.1 31.5 25,5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+111), s 8.6 5.4 7.5 4.D 2.6 16.0 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.9 0.1] 2.9 0,2 0.0 3.2 Intersection Summary FILM 5th Ctrl Delay 18.2 HCM 6th LOS B Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2024 PM WO 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 10x 2019 -- r+ -- t Movement ESL EBT RR WK WST WHIR NOL NBT NBR S13L S67 SRO Lane CanfiquraGons ' ++ r 4 tf r M tt r 8.1 tt r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 273 M 529 234 640 43 239 297 260 54 32S 112 Future Volume (vehPh) 273 922 529 234 640 43 239 297 260 54 329 112 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.40 1.DD 1.00 1.40 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1.00 1.QD 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vehfhlln 1856 IBM, 1870 1870 1341 1870 1856 1874 1670 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 279 941 D 239 653 D 244 343 0 55 336 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.38 0.98 0.98 0.9$ 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 369 1553 325 1493 330 717 78 530 ArrlVa On Green 0.11 4.44 0.00 0.09 4.43 0.00 0.10 0.20 C.00 0.04 0.15 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3428 3526 1585 3456 3437 1585 3425 ,3654 1555 1781 X554 M5 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 279 941 0 239 653 0 244 343 0 55 336 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.5 16.7 0.0 5.5 34.8 0.0 5.7 6.1 0.0 2.5 7.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(c,-c), s 6.5 16.7 11).0 5.5 log 0.0 5.7 6,1 0.0 25 7.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1 00 1.00 100 1,OD 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 369 1553 325 1443 330 717 78 530 VPC Ratin(X) 076 0.61 0.73 0.44 074 0.42 0.71 0.63 Avail Cap(cw,a), vehlh 524 1553 444 1493 440 1808 194 1739 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 4.0D 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). stveh 35.4 17.5 0.0 36.0 16.5 0.0 36.0 285 0.0 38.8 327 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 3.9 1.8 0.0 4.1 0.9 0.0 4_5 0.4 0.0 11.2 1.3 0.0 Initial C Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0,0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 4.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(60%),vahnn 2.8 6.5 0.0 24 4.2 0.0 25 26 0,0 1.3 3.1 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl sJveh 39.3 19.2 O.D 40 1 174 0.9 40.5 289 0.0 49.8 33.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 1224 A 892 A 547 A 391 A Approach Delay, sfveh 23.8 23.5 34.0 36.2 Approach 'LOS C C 0 D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 21.0 12.2 40.5 12.4 16.7 13.3 39.4 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 45 45 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 8.9 41.6 10.5 360 10-5 40.0 12.5 34.0 ht1ax 0 Clear Tim (g_C+li), s 4.5 8.1 ..5 18.7 ; .r' 9.3 95 12.8 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2.1 0.2 6.1 0.2 2.3 0.4 4.4 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.1 HCM 6th LOS G Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for jNBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frons calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2024 PM WO 2; Henry St & Q:jeer Kaailumanu Hwy 102W2019 Movement F-i3L EBT FSR WK W8T WGR NDL NBT NRR SBI, SBT S89 Lane ConfiquratIons tt ff r 4t r I IM Traffic Volume (vph) 200 697 306 76 976 330 132 334 36 365 359 200 Future Volume (vph) 200 697 306 76 575 330 132 334 36 366 359 200 16aal Flow (vphpl) 1900 190{7 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 19M 19DO 1900 1900 Total Lost time (8) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane tail. Factor 4,97 0,95 1,00 097 0.95 1,00 0.91 4.91 1.00 0,94 091 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.98 1-00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbike8 1.00 1.QD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 Fd 1.00 1,00 085 100 1,00 0.85 1.00 1I,00 9.85 100 095 Flt Protected 0-95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.10 0.95 1.00 Satd.How (prof) 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1610 3193 Fft Permitted 17.95 1,00 1.00 095 1,00 1,00 0.95 1.Co 1.00 01.95 1.00 Satd. Flaw (perm) 3335 35.39 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1610 3193 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. HOW (vph) 204 711 312 78 588 337 135 3A1 37 373 366 204 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 208 0 0 241 0 0 30 0 46 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 204 711 104 78 588 96 121 355 7 317 580 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Con#I (likes. (#Ihr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (95) 5% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8:6 32..2 32.2 3.9 27.5 27.5 17.4 17.4 117.4 25.4 25.4 EffecDve Green, g (s) 8_6 32.2 32.2 3.9 27.5 27.5 17.4 17.4 17.4 25.4 25.4 Actuated WC Ratio 0.09 0,33 0.33 0,04 0,28 0.28 0.18 0,18 0,18 0.26 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extensian (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3_0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap (vpb) 295 1176 526 138 986 443 286 607 275 422 836 Ws Ratio Prat x0.06 00.20 0.02 €1.17 0.08 00.10 00°20 0.18 Os Putin Perm 007 0.06 0.00 Wo Ratio 0.69 0.60 0.20 0,57 0,60 0.22 0.42 0.58 0,02 0.75 069 Uniform Delay, di 42.9 27.0 23.1 45.7 29.9 26.5 35.3 36.4 32.8 32.8 32.2 Pragras8ion Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-M lrlcremental Delay, d2 68 2.3 0.8 52 2.7 11 10 1.4 0.0 7.4 2.5 Delay (s) 49.7 29.3 24.0 50.9 32.6 27.6 35.3 37.9 32.8 40.2 34.8 Level flf Sarvice D C C ❑ C C ❑ ❑ c ID C Approach Delay (s) 31.4 32.3 37 1 36.6 Approach LDS C C D D Ir b%Uction Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 33.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 96.9 Surn of lost tint (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 14.1% ICU Level of Sarvioe b Analysis Pernod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM WO 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 10P2019 tritomeiciinn Int N18y, slveh Movement 12 EBL EBR NBL NBT 85T SBR Lane Contiguralmns I ? 108'9 + + r Tr r, V43I, v" 11 74 SSS 970 1055 18 Future Vol, vWh 11 74 88 870 1055 18 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 9 0 17 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Frea Free Frea RT CbannWl Led - Free .1 None - Yield ,Storage Length 140 0 450 Platoon blocked. % 700 Veh in Median Sibrage. # 0 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 38 - - Grade. % 0 38 - 0 0 Stage 1 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 4 2 5 Mvmt Fkaw 11 76 91 1OW 1889 19 141' OUMincr Minar2 Major1 Majur2 Conflicting Flew All 2271 1089 0 9 Stage 1 108'9 - Stage 2 1182 - - - - - Critioal Hdwy 13.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 44 0 541 Stage 1 323 0 - - Stage 2 291 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 38 - 641 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 38 - Stage 1 277 - Stage 2 291 - - Approach EB 1rt93 SB H'IPA Control Delay. s 1H9 1 0 HCM LOS F tNor Laneg-flajar Mvnit `j1h N13T �,Bl..n 1 F-BLn2 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 841 38 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.142 0.298 - HCM CanlmJ Delay {s} 11 5 135.9 0 f4CM Lane LDS B F A. HCM 95th %tiler € INA) 0.5 1 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM WO 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 10P 2019 tritemeictinn Int N18y, slveh Movement 2 WWI 1h113R NEST Nl8R 8131L 513T Lane Contiguralmns I i" 11� Stage 1 1021 Traffic, V{}I, v" 15 75 9838 4 64 1087 Future Vol, vWh 15 75 988 4 64 1067 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 Q 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Cbarinei Led - Stop 2.272 Yield - None Storage Length 4 a Stage 1 0 - Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 Stage 2 269 - Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 Mvmt Fkaw 15 77 1019 4 66 110 m9li rrIM1140^ IAtWI _ Mawl ^Maj Conflicting Flew All 2253 1021 0 0 1019 0 Stage 1 1021 Stage 2 1232 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.47 5,22 - 4.18 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.47 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.47 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.563 3.318 2.272 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 44 287 658 Stage 1 340 - - - Stage 2 269 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 40 287 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver Ott Stage 1 340 - Stage 2 242 - - - Approach WB N9 SB H'IPA Con (raI Delay, s 42.3 a 11.5 HCM LOS F MNr Laneg-Aajar Mvnit NBT N"8Ln1W8Ln2 SBL SET Capacity (vetalh) 40 287 658 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.387 0.269 0.1 HCM CarilmJ Delay {s} - 143.3 221 11 1 f4CM Lane LDS F C 6 HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 1-3 1.1 0.3 5:00 prn Baseline Synchs 19 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 Phi WO 5: Puapusanui St 1O 2019 ,- t Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR Sl3L SBS° Lane CanfiquraGons r f i'f I t Traffic VDlurne (vehlh) 35 112 867 50 139 952 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 36 112 867 50 139 952 Initial Q (0b), vats 4 0 0 0 0 D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.0t) 1,00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1B26 1856 1841 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 37 4 894 0 143 981 Peak Hour Factor 03.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.37 0,97 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 2 5 3 4 2 2 Cap, vehlh 58 1348 176 1632 ArrlVa On Green 0.03 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.10 0.87 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 37 0 894 0 143 981 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 0.0 24.2 0.0 7.5 13.4 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 2.0 0.D 24.2 0.0 7.5 13.4 Prop In Lane 100 1 00 100 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 58 1348 176 1632 VPC Ratin6X) 063 0.66 0.81 0.60 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehPh 337 1348 253 1632 HOM Platoon rube 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 1,00 Ono 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 45.4 0.D 6.9 0.0 42.0 1.6 Inca Delay (d2), shah 10.8 0.0 2.6 0.0 12.4 1.6 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(0%),vahnn 1.0 0.0 8.5 00 3.8 1.8 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Nlay(d),sJveh 56.2 0.0 9.4 0.0 54.4 3.3 LnGrp LOS E A D A Approach Vol, vehlh 37 A 894 A 1124 Approach Delay, sfveh 56.2 9.4 9.8 Approach 'LOS E A A Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.9 73.6 87.5 7.6 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 65.0 83.D 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 9.5 25.2 15.4 4.0 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 8,8 11.3 0.0 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.5 HC'M 6th LOS B Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM WO 6: Kuakini Street 10r2019 tritomeefion Int Meloy, shah Movement a 5 EBL EBR NOL SST SBR Laren Contiguralmns I ir" 0 + + r Tralfir, V{}I, v" 14 391 255 898 932 38 Future Vol, vWh 14 391 255 896 932 38 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led - Free 2.218 None Yield ,Storage Length 150 0 630 Stage 1 700 Veh in Median Sinrage, # 0 - - {k Q - Grade. % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Mvmt Fkaw 14 399 260 916 951 a9 Nt €irml iol` Mirior2 Ma orl raj cr2 Conflicting Flow All 2387 951 0 0 Stage 1 951 - Stage 2 1436 - - - - - Crltioci Hdwy 6.48 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.48 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.48 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3,572 - 2.218 Pat Gap- t Maneuver 36 0 722 Stage 1 366 0 - - Stage 2 212 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 23 - 722 - - - Mrry Cap -2 Maneuver 23 - Stage 1 234 - Stage 2 212 - - Approach EB N9 SB Hr"PA Con tral Delay. sS 302 1 29 r HCM LOS F Minor LaneJP-Hajar 4lunit `SBL IQT' , n 1 FB02 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 722 23 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.365 0.621 - HCNI CanlmJ Delay {s} 12.8 -$302.1 0 PGM Lane LDS 8 F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 11.6 1.8 Notes Volume excaeds capacity ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2024 PM WO T (_ak0 Street 102W2019 --* *--- 1 .01 Movement EBL BBT SBR WCL WBT WHIR NK NBT N t %L $81 SBR Lane CanfiquraGons tr T + r I t Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 133 32 0 65 41 203 39 792 67 t90 922 179 Future Volume (vehPh) 133 32 50 65 41 203 39 792 67 1:90 922 179 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1,06 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 04 1.00 1,00 1.0(1 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1841 1810 1670 1870 1826 1626 1856 1856 1870 1855 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 139 33 0 68 4.3 D 41 B25 D 198 960 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 180 192 1105 108 242 1137 343 1109 ArrlVa On Green 0.10 4.10 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.56 0.00 0.07 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1753 1870 0 1781 1526 0 1757 1856 1565 1767 1+370 1585 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 139 33 0 68 43 0 41 825 0 196 960 D Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.6 1.4 0.0 3.2 2.0 0.0 0.8 30.4 0.0 4.0 37.0 0.0 Cycle Q clea(c,-c), s 6.6 1.4 0.0 32 2.0 0.0 0.8 31,'7,4 0.0 4.0 37.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 0.00 1 00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 180 192 105 108 242 1037 343 1109 VPC Ratin6X) 077 0.17 4.65 0.44 017 0.80 0.58 0.87 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 367 341 373 362 281 1437 389 1109 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1..00 1.06 0.00 1 0o 1.00 (1.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 376 35.3 0.0 3a.6 390 0.0 14.5 15.1 0.0 144 147 0.0 Inca Delay (d2), shah 6.8 0.4 01 6.5 2.4 0.0 0.3 6.3 0.0 1.5 9.1 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0,0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We Back=(50%),vahlln 3.1 0.6 0.0 16 0.4 0,0 0.3 13.2 0,0 18 163 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),sJveh 44.5 367 0.0 46.1 41,4 0.0 14.8 21,4 0.0 16.0 23.8 0.13 LnGrp LOS D D D D B C B C Approach Vol, vehlh 172 A 111 A 865 A 1158 A Approach Delay, slveh 42.8 44.3 21.1 22.5 Approach 'LOS D D C C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 9 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 52.6 13.3 7.6 55.5 9.6 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 45 4.5 45 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s B_3 47.7 16.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 6.0 32.4 8.6 2.8 39.D 5.2 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 5,5 0.3 0.0 5.9 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.5 HC'M 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t t HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjon Summary 2024 PM WO 8; Kamehameha fill Road & Queen Keahurnanu Hwy 10f 2019 WVement rM EST RR WK WBT WER NGL NET NOR SSL $ES SBR Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r F+ I 'fit Traffic Volume (vehlh) 345 12 55 7 12 19 67 520 12 18 537 298 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 305 12 55 7 12 19 67 520 12 18 537 298 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.04 1.40 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1,OD 1.04 1.40 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,OD Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1767 1767 1811 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856" 1556 1870 1874 1874 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 321 13 0 7 13 2D 71 547 13 19 565 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 9 9 6 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 379 15 11 21 32 91 849 20 39 1566 ArT[Va On Green 0.23 0.23 0.00 4.04 0.44 0.04 0.05 0.47 0.47 0.02 044 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1620 56 1535 298 553 851 1757 1805 43 1781 3647 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 334 0 0 44 0 0 71 0 560 19 565 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1686 0 1535 1702 0 D 1767 0 184E 1781 1777 D Q Serve(g_s), s 14.4 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 17.5 0.8 6.0 0.0 Cycle Q clea(c,-c), s 14.4 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 17.5 08 go 0.a Prop In Lane 0.96 100 4 17 0.50 1.00 0.02 1 00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 394 0 64 0 D 91 0 869 39 1566 VPC Ratin(X) 0.85 O.OD 4.63 0.00 0.40 078 0.00 f1.64 049 0.36 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 574 4 571 0 0 165 0 81;x9 119 1566 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.40 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.44 1.00 100 000 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 278 O.D 0.0 36.1 0.0 0,0 35.6 0.0 153 36.8 14 1 00 Inca Deiay (d2), shah 7.9 0.0 0.0 9.7 0.4 0.0 13.4 0.0 3.7 9.3 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 We 13ack=(5C%),vahnn 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.D 16 0,0 7.0 0.4 29 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 35.7 0.0 0.0 457 0,0 0.0 49.0 0.0 19.0 46.1, 14.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A D A A D A B D B Approach Vol, vehlh 334 A 40 631 584 A Approach Delay, sfveh 35.7 45.7 22.4 15.6 Approach 'LOS D D C B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.3 8.4 38.0 7.4 6.2 40.3 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 45 4.5 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 25.9 7.1 33.5 25,5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+l1), s 15.4 5.0 10.0 3.8 2.8 19.5 Green Ext Time (p c), s 1,4 0.0 3.5 01 0.0 3.0 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 23.:3 HCM 6th LOS G Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, 913R] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report peqA 13 Appendix E Analysis Reports — Future With Project Conditions (2024) HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2024 AM W 1: natant Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 100P'2019 Movement 1=81- EBT RR 4VINL WBT WEE RK NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons t+ r tt r tt r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) r 48 a 225 172 734 29 255 202 116 21 337 186 FLltkire Volume (vehPh) 7J 434 729 172 734 29 255 202 116 21 337 186 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 (11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1737 1767 1737 1841 1811 1841 1841 1870 1656 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 77 494 0 176 749 D 260 206 D 21 344 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 164 1509 259 1634 355 807 41 518 ArrlVa On Green 0.05 0.45 0.00 0.08 0.47 0.00 0.10 0.23 0.00 0.02 0.15 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1560 3401 3504 1572 1781 3554 1565 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 77 494 4 176 749 D 260 206 0 21 344 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1605 1678 1472 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.9 7.6 0.4 4.1 11.8 0.0 6.0 3.8 0.0 0.9 7.4 0.0 Cycle Q cle8r(c,-c), s 1.9 7.6 4.0 4.1 11.8 0.0 6.0 3.8 0d1 0.9 7.4 4.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 1 00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 164 1509 259 1634 355 807 41 518 VPC Ratin(X) 047 0.33 0.68 0.46 073 0.26 0.51 0.66 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 247 1509 440 1634 605 2081 122 1692 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 t.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.174 1.04 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1,06 0.00 1 Oft 1.00 0.0D 1.00 1.{117 0.00 1.00 1.00 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). slveh 371 f. 4.3 0.0 36.2 14.2 O.D ?4 9 25.5 0.0 38.8 325 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 2.1 0.6 0.0 3.1 0.9 4.D 2.9 0.2 0.0 9.2 1.5 0.0 Initial 4,1 Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 O.D D.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.6 0,0 We Back=(0%),vahnn 0.8 28 0.0 17 43 O.D 26 1.6 0,0 0 5 3.2 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl slveh 39.2 14.9 0.0 39.3 15.1 0.D 37.8 26.7 0.0 43.1 34.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 571 A 925 A 466 A 365 A Approach Delay, sfveh 18.1 19.7 32,5 34.8 Approach 'LOS B B C C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 22.8 10.6 40.7 12.9 16.2 8.6 42.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4,5 45 4.5 45 4,5 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 47.9 10,4 34.0 14.3 38.3 6.2 38.2 Max C Clear Time (g_C+l1), s 2.9 5.8 6.1 9.6 8.0 9.4 3.9 13.8 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 1,4 0.2 3.3 05 2,4 0.0 5.4 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.2 HCM 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 33.2 HCM 2700 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.4 Burn of lost Chit (U) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 2024 AM W 2; Henry St & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy c Ci itical Lane Group 1QI 9,'2019 _-r --* #- Movement i=8L EBT HR W9 WBT WBR N131- NBT NRR SBL SBT SM Lane COnfiquratIons tf r M t+ r 4t r 1 4_� Traffic Volume (vph) 112 382 130 57 658 512 153 354 45 385 3501 130 Future Volume (vph) 112 382 130 57 658 512 153 354 45 385 356 130 l6aal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 19DO 1900 19W Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ut 1. Factor 0.97 0,95 1.00 097 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,94 491 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.99 1-00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 Loll 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fd 100 1,00 085 100 1,00 0.85 1.00 1l,00 0.85 100 097 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1M 0.95 0.99 Satd. How (prof) 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1545 1554 3343 1487 1595 3 17 4 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,0D 0.95 1.1]0 1.01) 095 0.99 Satd. Flaw i(perm) 3099 3282 1515 3303 3406 15_48 1564 3348 1487 1595 3174 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. HOW (vph) 115 394 134 59 678 528 158 365 46 397 367 134 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 91 0 4 373 0 0 37 0 21 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 394 43 59 578 155 142 381 9 298 579 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 2 2 4 3 3 4 Gonfl (likes. (#Ihr) 1 Heavy Vehicles 13% 13% 5 6% 6% 3% 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prat NA Herrn Split NA Perm: Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.6 30.5 30.5 4.1 28.0 28.0 18. 1, 18.1 18.1 24.7 24.7 EffecDve Green, g (s) 6.6 30.5 X.5 4.1 28.0 213.0 18.1 18.1 18.1 24.7 24.7 Actuated WC Rabo 0-07 0,32 0.32 0.04 0,29 0.29 0.19 0,19 0,19 0.26 0.26 Clearance Tinge (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extensian (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap(vpb) 214 1049 484 141 999 454 296 635 282 412 821 Ws Ratio Prat x0.04 0.12 0.02 c0.20 0.09 c4.11 00.19 0.18 Os HOW Perm. O.Q3 11.10 0.01 Wo Ratio 4:54 0,38 0,09 042 0.69 0.34 0.48 0.60 0,03 0.72 070 Uniform Delay, di 42.9 25.1 22.7 44.5 29.7 26.5 34.5 35.3 31.5 32.2 32.0 Pragras8ion Factor 1.00 1,013 1.110 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 lrlcremental Delay, d2 2.6 1,0 0,4 2.0 3.7 2.0 12 15 0,0 6.2 2.8 Delay (s) 45.5 26.1 23.1 46.5 33.4 28.5 355.7 36.9 31.5 38.4 34.8 Level of Sarvice D C C ❑ C C D ❑ C f] G Approach Delay (s) 29.0 320 36 1 36.0 Approach LDS C D D llnb% otiorl Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 33.2 HCM 2700 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 95.4 Burn of lost Chit (U) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 701% ICU Level of Sarvioe C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 AM 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 1O 2019 tritomectibn Int C7e18y, sVveh 17 7 Movement EMI SBR NBL NBT 85T SBR 1 Lane Contiguralmns j 890 0 {r Stage 1 Trafrir, V431. v" 46 51 180 1{},'36 827 32 Future Vol, vWh 46 51 180 1086 827 32 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Cantrat Stop Stmt Free Free Free Free RT CbannWl Led • Free - None - Yield Storage Length 140 0 650 700 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 0 Stage 2 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 Mvmt Fkaw 49 55 194 1168 889 34 M-OrWincr Minar2 M1 ^Maj ort Conflicting Flaw All 2446 890 0 0 Stage 1 890 - Stage 2 1556 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver -34 0 761 Stage 1 401 0 - - Stage 2 191 0 - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -25 - 760 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -25 - Stage 1 298 Stage 2 191 - - - Approach EB N9 SB HOW Contral Delay. -$ 789 5 16 D HCM LOS F Minor LaneJl-Hajar 41unr1 NBL IQT' , n 1 FBLn2 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 7& 25 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.255 1.978 - HCM CrunFol Dslay {s} 11 3 -S789.5 0 PGM Lane LDS B F A, HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 1 - 6-1 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM Sth TWSC 2024 AM 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 1O 2019 tritomeethn Int N18y, slveh 4.5 Movement WWI 1N1313NET Nl8R 8BL NS13T Lane Contiguralmns T). Traffir, V431. vetti(h 9 Future Vol, vWh 9 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 Sign Control Stop RT Channel Led 1117 Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Sicrage, # 0 Grade. % 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Fkaw 10 i" T). 1_ I�Aof2 _ 147 1.117 16 77 7t 147 1117 16 77 798 0 0 0 0 0 Stop Free Free Free Free Stop Yield - None 0 - 0 - - 0 93 93 93 93 93 2 2 13 5 5 158 1201 17 83 8M 141jotfMint�r Minorl -,_.-.. 1_ I�Aof2 _ Conflicting Flow A.II 2234 1210 0 0 1201 0 Stage 1 1210 Stage 2 1024 - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 6.22 416 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2 754 Pot Gap- t Maneuver 47 223 567 Stage 1 282 - - - Stage 2 347 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 40 223 - - 567 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 40 Stage 1 282 - Stage 2 296 - - - Approach we NB SB H GPA Control Delay, 5 568 0 1 1 HCM LOS F M Nor Laneg-Aajar `wlunit NET °N§"8Ln1WWBLg2 SBL SET Capacity ) 40 223 567 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.242 4.709 0.146 HCU Canlml delay {s} - 121,8 52.8 12.4 - HCM Lane LDS F F B HCM 95th %tiler € INA) 0.8 4-6 0.5 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 AM W 5; Puapusanui St 100,20 19 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL GBT Lane CanfiquraGons r f r I + Traffic Volume (vehlh) 92 194 957 27 45 7517 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 92 194 957 27 45 767 Initial Q (0b), vats 4 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No P -lo Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1826 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 98 4 1018 0 48 816 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 3 2 2 5 Cap, vehlh 126 1403 66 9531 ArrlVa On Green 0.07 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.04 0.84 Sat Flow, vahPh 1781 1585 %6 1585 1781 1826 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 98 0 1018 0 48 816 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh,4n 1781 1586 1856 1585 1781 4826 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.4 0.0 29.4 0.0 2.6 12.9 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 5.4 0.0 29.4 0.0 2.6 12.9 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 too Lane Grp Cap(c), veh1h 125 1403 66 1531 VPC Ratin(X) 078 0.73 0.73 0.53 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 324 1403 117 1531 HOM Platoon Rana 1_00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.01 Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 1,10 Ono 1.00 LOCI Uniform Delay (d). aNeh 45.2 O.D 6.5 0.0 472 2.3 Inca Delay (d2), shah 9.9 0.0 3.3 0.0 14.2 1.3 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 GO 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(50%),vahnn 2.7 0.0 9.9 00 14 2.9 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),slveh 85.1 0.0 9.8 0.0 61.3 3.7 LnGrp LOS E A E A Approach Vol, vehlh 98 A 1018 A 864 Approach Delay, sfveh 55.1 9.8 6.9 Approach 'LOS E A A Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 79.3 87.5 11.5 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 72.0 89.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 4.5 31.4 14.9 7.4 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 11,4 7,9 0.9 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 10.8 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th TWSC 2624 AM VV 6: Kuakini Street 1012912019 tritemeeiciinn Int t eiayr, sVveh Movement 11 4 EMI BAR NBL NBT 85T SBR Lane Gantiguralmns I r 0 + } r Tralfir, V431. v" 7 178 543 856 797 66 Future Vol, vWh 7 178 543 856 797 66 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led . Free None Pat Gap -1 Maneuver Yield Storage Length 160 0 630 Stage 1 416 700 Veh in Median Storage. # 0 - - 104 0 - Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 4 2 5 5 Stage 1 Mvmt Fkaw 8 191 584 92O 857 71 tot driminol`_ Minor.? MW1 ^Maj ort Conflicting Flog Ali 2,945 857 0 0 Stage 1 857 Stage 2 2688 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 16 0 783 Stage 1 416 0 - - Stage 2 104 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -4 - 783 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -4 Stage 1 106 Stage 2 104 Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Con Ira I Delay. S 1998 h 85 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlaj dr Mvnit N12L KBT �,B',In 1 EBU7. 2 SET SEIR Capacity (vetalh) 783 4 - HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.746 1.882 - HCM CanlmJ Delay {s} 218 S 1998.6 0 - HCM Lane LDS C F A, HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 6.9 1.9 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2024 AM W T Lako Street 10r2W2019 � � � Movement HIL EBT SBR Wyk, WBT WHIR NaL NBT NPR SBS SBT SRIF Lane COnfiquraGons i 110 t r t r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 267 50 73 73 38 284 35 841 58 152 699 135 FLltkire Volume (vehPh) 267 50 73 73 38 284 35 841 58 152 699 135 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1670 1870 1870 1641 1811 1856 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 284 53 0 78 40 D 37 895 D t62 744 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap,vehlh 316 332 115 122 298 952 218 W2 ArrlVa On Green 0.18 0.18 0.00 4.07 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.51 0.00 0.06 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1x356 I W Grp Volume(v), vehlh 284 53 D 78 40 0 37 895 D 162 744 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 156D 1725 1856 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.2 2.3 0.0 4.2 2.0 0.0 0.9 43.9 0.0 4-3 30.0 0.0 Cycle Q clea(c,-c), s 15.2 2.3 0.0 4.2 2.0 0.0 0.9 43,9 0.0 4.3 30.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 0.00 100 0.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 315 332 115 122 298 952 218 1002 VPC Ratin(X) 090 0.18 0.68 0.33 012 0.94 074 0.74 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 329 346 326 345 331 952 222 1002 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 0.0D 1.00 1.00 O.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 39.2 33.9 0.0 44.:5 435 0.D 144 226 0.0 21.9 172 00 Inca Delay (d2), shah 25.3 0.2 0.0 67 1.5 0.0 0.2 17.9 0.0 12.3 5.0 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 Q.0 00 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(50%),vahlln 88 1:1 0.0 20 10 0,D 04 22.6 00 25 133 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl slveh 64-5 34.1 0.0 513 45,1 0.0 14.6 40.4 0.0 34.2 222 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C D D B D w". C Approach Vol, vehlh 337 A 118 A 932 A 906 A Approach Delay, shah 59.7 49.2 39.4 24.3 Approach 'LOS E. D D C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.7 54.1 21.8 7-7 57.1 10.9 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 45 4.5 45 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.4 49.6 16.0 5.0 51.0 16.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 6.3 45.9 17.2 2.9 32.0 6.2 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2.1 0.1 0.0 5,3 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay ;3d.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjcn Summary 2424 AM W 8; KaCT1ehameha 111 Road & Queen Keahumanu Hwy 10 '912019 Movement rM EST RR Wyk. WBT WEE NOL NSA" NBR L SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r + T +T+ Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 167 5 27 17 13 1t} 80 505 16 15 449 307 Future Volume (vehPh) 167 5 27 117 13 15 84 505 16 15 449 307 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.04 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1,OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1722 1781 1781 1781 1752 1811 1511 1870 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate. vehlh 180 5 0 18 14 17 88 543 17 16 483 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 4.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 12 8 8 8 10 6 6 2 6 6 Cap, vehlh 243 7 27 21 25 106 922 29 34 16601 ArrlVa On Green 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.08 0.53 0.5a 0.02 0.46 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1735 45 1455 595 462 561 1668 1745 55 1781 3532 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 185 0 0 49 0 D 86 0 560 16 483 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1784 0 1459 1618 0 D 1668 0 1800 1781 1721 D Q Serve(g_s), s 6.7 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 14.3 0.6 5.7 0.0 Cyan Q clear(cg-r), S 6-7 0.0 a.0 2.0 a.o 0.0 3.4 0,0 14.3 0.6 5.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 097 100 027 0.35 1.00 4.03 100 000 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 250 0 72 0 0 108 0 951 34 1661 VPC Ratin(X) 074 {1.00 0.68 000 0.00 079 0.00 0.59 047 0.29 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 688 4 614 0 0 226 0 951 135 1661 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 100 000 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.170 I'to 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 277 4.D 0.0 31.6 0.0 0.0 31.0 0.0 10.9 32.6 105 0.0 Incr Deiay (d2), shah 4.3 0.0 0.0 10.6 0.0 0.0 12.2 0.0 2.7 9.5 0.4 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We 13ack=(50%),vahnn 30 0.0 0,0 10 0.0 0.D 16 00 5,0 0.3 18 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Dulay(d),sheh 32.0 0.0 0.0 422, 0.0 0.9 43 1 0.0 13.5 42.2 10.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Approach Vol, vehlh 185 A 49 646 499 A Approach Delay, sfveh 32.0 42.2 17.5 11.9 Approach 'LOS C D B B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.9 8.9 36.9 7.5 5.8 40.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 45 4.5 Max Green Setting (Grnax), s 25.9 9.1 31.5 25,5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+l1), s 8,7 5.4 7.7 4.D 2.6 16.3 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.9 0.t] 2.9 0,2 0.0 3.2 Intersection Summary FILM 8th Ctrl Delay 18.3 HCM 6th LOS B Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 AM 9: Kona Vista Roadway 1O 2019 tritemectinn Int N18y, slveh Movement 2 VYBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT t Lane Contiguralmns 0 0 923 0 Stage 1 923 _ Traffic, V{}I, v" 29 61 849 14 13 846 Future Vol, vehlh 29 61 849 14 13 846 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Free RT CbarinWiLed 3.318 Yield 2.215 Yield . None Storage Length 0 0 585 695 - Veh in Median Sicrage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Fkaw 32 66 923 15 14 92C m4orm6o mirtaYl _ Magi �hillgpr2-, Conflicting Flew All 1871 923 0 0 923 0 Stage 1 923 _ Stage 2 948 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 8.22 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.215 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 79 327 740 Stage 1 387 - - - Stage 2 377 - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 77 327 - - 740 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 77 Stage 1 387 Stage 2 370 Approach we N9 SB H'IPA Control Delay. s 388 L 02 HCM LOS E M Nor Laneg-Aajar'vlunrl NBT °Ni "8Ln1VWBLnZ SBL SST Capacity (vetalh) 77 327 740 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.409 4.203 0.419 HCM CarilmJ Delay {s} - 81 18.8 16 - f4CM Lane LDS F C A HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 1-6 0-7 0.1 5:00 prn Baseline Synchs 10 Report Pi8gA 14 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2024 PM 1: Palanl Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 1110112019 Movement EK EBT RR Wilk. WBT WHIR NIL NBT NPR SBL s67 S89 Lane CanfiquraGons 1 tt r 4 t+ r 7 tt r I tt r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 273 941 525 235 664 413 239 297 265 55 32S 112 Future Volume (vehih) 273 941 529 235 654 48 239 297 265 55 329 112 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.40 1.DD 1.40 1.40 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1,00 1.40 100 1.00 1,0113 1.00 1.00 1,fl41 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1856 1856 1670 1870 1811 1870 1856 1070 1670 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 279 960 0 240 667 D 244 3173 0 56 336 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 4.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 b.9$ 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 3169 1552 326 1493 330 715 78 530 ArrlVa On Green 0.11 4.44 0.00 4.09 0.43 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.00 0.04 0.15 0.00 Sat Flow, vahih 3428 3526 1585 3456 3497 1585 3428 ,1 a4 1585 1781 X554 M5 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 279 960 0 240 667 D 244 303 D 56 336 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 9777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.5 17.1 0.0 5.5 11.0 0.0 5.7 6.1 0.0 2.5 7.3 0.0 Cycle Q clear(c,-c), s 6.5 17.1 0.0 5.5 11.0 4.0 5.7 6,1 0.0 25 7.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 100 100 1,OD 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 369 1552 326 1493 330 715 78 534 VIC Ratin(X) 076 0.62 0.74 0.45 074 0.42 0.71 0.63 !wail Cap(cw,a), vehlh 524 1552 444 1493 440 1848 194 1738 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.001 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DD 1.00 1..4111 0.00 1.00 1.04 0.130 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 354 17.6 0.0 36.0 t66 Q.D 36.0 286 0.0 38.8 327 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 3.9 1.9 0.0 4.2 1.0 41.1) 4_5 04 0.0 ti -4 1.3 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 O.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 We Back=(50%),vahnn 2.8 67 0.0 24 4.3 O.D 25 2.6 0D 1.3 3 1 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, slveh LnGrp Nlay(dl sJveh 39.3 19.5 O.D 40.2 17.6 0.0 40.5 28!) 0.0 500 340 0,0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 1239 A 9D7 A 547 A 392 A Approach Delay, sfveh 23.9 23.6 34.1 36.2 Approach 'LOS C O C D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 21.0 12.2 40.5 12.4 16.7 13.3 39.4 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 45 45 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 8.9 41.6 10.5 360 10-5 40.0 12.5 34.0 ht1ax 0 Clear Tim (g_C+li), s 4.5 8.1 ..5 15.1 7. r' 9.3 95 13.0 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2.1 O.2 6.2 0.2 2.3 D 4 4.4 Intersection Summary FILM 0th Ctrl Delay 27.2 HCM 6th LOS G Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2024 PM W 2; Henry St & Q:jeer Kaahumanu Hwy 1110112019 Movement LBL EBT M W9 W8T WWBR NQL NBT NRR S8L SST S89 Lane CanfiquratIons ++ r ff r 4t r 1 41" Traffic Volume (vph) 200 722 306 79 341 132 334 37 379 359 200 Future Volume (vph) 200 722 306 79 596 341 132 334 37 379 359 200 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 190{7 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 19DO 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane tail. Factor 0,97 0.95 1,130 097 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,94 091 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.98 1-00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 Fd 1.00 1.00 085 100 1,00 0.85 1.00 i3OO 0.85 100 095 Flt Protected 0-95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.010 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd.How (prof) 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1610 3193 Fft Permitted 17.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,00 0.95 1.110 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flaw (perm) 3335 35.39 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 x610 3193 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. HOW (vph) 204 737 312 81 608 348 135 341 38 387 3ft 204 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 209 0 0 249 0 0 31 0 44 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 204 737 103 81 608 99 121 355 7 321 592 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Gonfl (likes. (#Ihr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (95) 5% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Priateclsd phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8:6 32..2 32.2 3.9 27.5 27.5 17.4 17.4 117.4 25-6 25.6 EflecDve Green, g (s) 8_6 32.2 32.2 3.9 27.5 27.5 17.4 11.4 17.4 25.5 25.5 Actuated WC Ratio 0-09 0,33 0.33 0,04 0,28 0.28 0.18 0,18 0,18 0.26 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extensian (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 295 1173 524 137 983 442 285 W6 275 424 841 Ws Ratio Prat x0.06 00.21 0.02 0.18 0.08 00.10 00°20 0.19 Os Putin Perm 0.07 11.06 0.00 Wo Ratio 0.69 0.63 020 4.59 0.62 0.22 0.42 0.59 0,02 0.76 0.70 Uniform Delay, di 43.0 27.4 23.2 45.8 30.2 26.5 35.4 36.5 32.9 32.9 32.3 Pragres8ion Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 lrlcremental Delay, d2 68 2.6 0.8 67 2.9 1,2 10 15 0,0 7.5 2.7 Delay (s) 49.6 30.4 24.1 52.5 33.2 27.8 36.4 38.0 32.9 40.4 35.0 Level of Sarvice D C C ❑ C C D D C f] D Approach Delay (s) 31.7 32.9 372 36.8 Approach LOS C C D D llnb% otion Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.1 HCM 2000 Level of SeFvic;e C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,59 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 97.1 Sum of lost tint (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 74.2% ICU Level of Sarvioe D Analysis Pernod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM W 3: Hualalai Fid (North)_1110112019 tritomeiciinn Int N18y, slveh 13 Movement EOL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1 Lane Contiguralmns I ? - } } r Traffic, V{}I, vetti(h 11 77 91 W4 1096 18 Future Vol, vehlh 11 77 91 1004 1096 18 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Free RT CbarinWLed - Free - None - Yield ,Storage Length 140 0 6W 700 Veh in Median Sbrage, # 0 - 0 - Grade. % 0 278 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 4 2 5 Mvmt Fkaw 11 79 94 1035 9130 19 m4ormi ol`� Miricr2�Magi Major2 Conflicting Flew All 2353 1130 0 0 Stage 1 1130 Stage 2 1223 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 39 0 618 Stage 1 308 0 - - Stage 2 278 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 33 - 618 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 33 Stage 1 261 Stage 2 278 - - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Coil Ira I Delay_ , s 1 3 1 1 0 HCM LOS F M Nor Laneg-Aajar M vnit `18L IgBT EKn 1 UO2 S8T SRF Capacity (vehih) 618 33 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.152 0.344 - HCU CanlmJ delay {s} 119 163.1 0 f4CM Lane LDS B F A, HCM 95th %tiler € lNeh) 0.6 1.1 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM Sth TWSC 2024 PM W 4; Hualalai Rd (South) 1110112019 totemeefion Int N18y, slveh Movement 72 WEI W13R NE3T Nl8R 'SBL SBT t Lane Contiguralmns j 1057 0 Stage 1 1059 Traffir, V431. v" 15 76 1025 4 64 11 1{1 Future Vol, vWh 15 75 1025 4 64 1110 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 b 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free: Free Free Free RT CharinWLed - Stop 2.272 YieMd - None ,Storage Length 4 0 Stage 1 0 - Veh in Median Sibrage, # 0 - fl - - 0 Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 }-Meavy Vehicles, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 Mvmt Fkaw 15 77 1057 4 66 1144 Sj Minor! ISA €�'1H11rrot_ _^ M&�Y1 Maj or2 ...,. , Conflicting Flew A,li 2335 1059 0 0 1057 0 Stage 1 1059 Stage 2 1276 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.47 6,22 - 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.47 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.47 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.563 3.318 2.272 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 39 273 636 Stage 1 326 - - - Stage 2 256 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 35 273 - - 635 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 35 Stage 1 326 Stage 2 229 Approach we trN9 SB H'IPA Con (raI Delay, s 482 L 0 5 HCM LOS F M NorLeneg-AajarMvnit NRT flRR615i.n1WF3Ln2 26L SRT Capacity (ve#r1h) 35 273 638 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.442 6.283 4.104 HCM t;dnFol Delay {s} - 172.6 23.3 113 f4CM Lane LDS F C B HCM 95th %tiler € INA) 1-5 1.1 0.3 5:00 prn Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2424 Phi 5: Puapuaanui St 1110112019 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL GBS" Lane CanliquraGons I F f r 1 fi Traffic Volume (vehlh) 38 112 904 52 139 995 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 38 112 904 52 139 995 Initial Q (0b), vats 4 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1825 1856 1841 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 39 4 932 0 143 1025 Peak Hour Factor 0-97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 2 5 3 4 2 2 Cap, vehlh 60 1347 176 1630 ArrlVa On Green 0.03 0.00 0.73 0.00 0.10 0.87 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1547 18x6 1560 1781 1870 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 39 0 932 0 143 1025 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 26.4 0.0 7.5 14.9 Cycle Q Clear(c,-c), s 2.1 0.0 A.4 0.0 7.5 14.8 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 1 00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 60 1347 176 1630 VPC Ratin(X) 065 0.69 0.81 0.63 !wail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 337 1347 253 1634 HOM Platoon maria 1.010 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.04 1,00 Ono 1.04 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 454 0.D 72 0.0 42.1 1.7 Incr Delay (d2), shah fl.1 0.0 2.9 00 12.5 1.9 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We l3ackD# (0%),vahnn 1.1 0.0 9.3 00 3.9 2.a Ursig. Movement Delay, slveh LnGrp Dulay(dl slveh %-5 4.0 10.1 0.0 545 3.6 LnGrp LOS E B D A Approach Vol, vehlh 39 A 932 A 1169 Approach Delay, sfveh 56.5 10.1 9.8 Approach 'LOS E B A Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.9 73.6 87.5 7.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 45 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 65.0 83.D 16.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 9.5 28.4 16.3 4.1 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 9.4 12.5 0.0 Intersection Summary FILM 5th Ctrl Delay 10.8 HC'M 6th LOS B Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors c1 the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM W 6: Kuakini Street 1110112019 tritemeefion Int N18y, srveh Movement 3 7 EBL EBR NBt. p`' SBT SBR Lane Contiguralmns I i 963 + r TralfiG Vil, v" 14 391 255 939 944 38 Future Vol, vWh 14 391 255 939 944 38 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slip Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led - Free 3651 None - - Yield ,Stcra0e Length 150 0 630 Platoon blocked. % 700 Veh in Median Sinrage, # 0 - - {k Q - Grade. % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Mvmt Fkaw 14 399 260 958 963 39 ttiA € mi or Minar2 MEM ort M�j o-2 Conflicting Flew Ali 2141 963 0 0 Stage 1 963 Stage 2 1478 - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.48 - 4 12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.48 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.41 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.072 2.218 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 33 0 715 Stage 1 3651 0 - - Stage 2 203 0 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 21 - 715 - - - Mrry Cap -2 Maneuver 21 - Stage 1 230 - Stage 2 203 - - Approach EB N9 SB HCFA Con Ira I Delay. sS 344 6 28 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlajar 4lunit h91h N13T ,RI„ n 1 FBLn2 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 715 r:1 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.364 0.68 HCU CanlmJ Delay {s} 12.9 -S3446 5 PGM Lane LDS E F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 1.7 1.9 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ' ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2024 PM VII T Lako Street 111`01120 1 9 --* --* *---+► Movement ESL EBT SBR WCL W8T WER NGL NST NOR M SBT SBR Lane COnfiquraGons T T + r I t r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 138 32 50 65 41 217 39 821 67 192 930 181 Future Volume (vehPh) 138 32 50 65 41 217 39 821 67 t92 930 181 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00 1.77 1.00 1.77 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,06 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1826 1856 1856 1870 1855 1$70 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 144 33 0 68 4.3 D 41 855 D 200 969 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap.vehlh 185 198 1105 108 234 1032 322 1105 ArrrVa On Green 0.11 4.11 0.00 0.46 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.56 0.00 0.07 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1753 1870 0 1781 1526 0 1767 1856 1595 1767 1+310 1585 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 144 33 0 68 43 0 411 855 D 200 969 D Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh3ln 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 1.4 0:0 3.2 2.0 0.0 0.8 32.6 0.0 4.0 38.0 0.0 Cycle Q cleaT(c,-c), s 6.9 1.4 0.0 32 2.0 0.0 4.8 32.8 0.0 4.0 38.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 0.00 1 00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 185 196 105 108 234 1032 322 1105 VPC Ratin(X) 078 0.17 0.65 0.40 018 0.83 0.62 0.88 Avail Cap(o..a), vehlh 365 394 371 381 272 1032 366 1105 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.{117 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 37 6 35.2 0.0 39.7 39.1 O.D 15.0 158 0.0 15.9 15.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 6.9 4.4 0.0 65 2.4 0.0 0.4 7.7 0.0 2.5 9.9 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 O.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(0%),vahlln 3.3 0.6 0.0 16 09 O.D 03 14.6 0,0 21 170 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),slveh 44.5 35.5 0.0 46.2 41.5 0.0 15.3 23.5 0.0 18,5 24.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D B C B C Approach Vol, vehlh 177 A 111 A 896 A 1169 A Approach Delay, shah 42.8 44.4 23.1 23.8 Approach 'LOS D D C C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 41 5 6 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.6 52.5 13.6 7.6 55.5 9.6 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s B.3 47.7 16.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 6.0 34.8 8.9 2.8 40.0 5.2 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 5,3 0.3 0.0 5.5 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.9 HCM 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t t HCM 6th Signalized Intersect on Summary 2024 PM W 8; KaI"ilehameha 111 Road Queen Kaahutl anU Hwy 1110112019 --- Movement -Mo ment rM EBT RR WK WRT WIRR NOL NSA" NOR UL SBT SRO Lane CanfiquraGons 2 4 r 6 + S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 1 8.5 38.0 +T 6.2 Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 315 12 55 7 12 20 67 538 12 98 542 301 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 315 12 55 7 12 2D 67 538 12 98 542 301 lnitial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D U 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.9D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1767 1767 1811 1870 1870 1670 1856 1656 1956 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 332 13 0 7 13 21 71 566 13 19 571 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.05 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.955 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 9 9 6 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 389 15 11 20 33 91 842 19 39 1559 ArrlVa On Green 0.24 4.24 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.47 0.47 0.02 0.44 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1622 64 1535 290 539 870 1767 1807 41 1781 3647 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 345 0 0 41 0 D 71 0 579 19 571 0 Grp Sort Ftow(s),vehlh,4n 1686 0 1535 1699 0 0 1767 0 1848 1781 17T7 0 43 Serve(g_s), s 15.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 18.7 0.8 8.3 0.0 Cycle Q clea(c,-c), s 15.01 0.6 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.4 3.0 0,0 18.E 0.8 8.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 096 1.00 0 17 0.51 1.00 0.02 1.00 0,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 404 0 65 0 b 91 0 862 39 1551 VPC Ratin(X) 085 0.40 4.64 000 0.00 078 0.00 0.67 4.49 0.37 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 569 0 564 0 0 163 0 862 116 1551 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1 Off 0,00 0.00 1.04 0.00 a.Ob 1.00 114 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). slveh 279 O.D 0.0 36.4 0.0 0.0 36,0 0.0 15.9 37 1 145 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 8.8 0.0 0.0 99 00 0.0 13.4 0.0 4.2 9.3 0.7 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,{1 We 13ack=(50%),vahnn 6.8 0.0 0.0 09 0.0 O.D 16 0,0 7..6 0,4 3.0 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 36_7 0.0 O.D 463 0,0 0.0 49.3 0.0 20.1 46.5 15.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A. D A A D A C D B Approach Vol, vehlh 3.45 A 41 650 590 A Approach Delay, sfveh 36.7 46.3 23.3 16.2 Approach 'LOS D D C B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.9 8.5 38.0 7.4 6.2 40.3 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 45 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.9 7.1 33.5 25.5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 17.0 5.0 10.3 3.3 2.8 20.7 Green Ext Time (p c), s 1,4 0.4D 3.5 0.1 0.0 3.0 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.1 HCM 6th LOS G Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, 913R] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM W 9: Kona Vista Roadway 1110112019 tritemeiciion Int N18y, slveh Movement 12 W13 WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT t Lane Contiguralmns 0 0 991 0 Stage 1 991 - Tr r, V43I, u" 12 39 912 41 45 98$ Future Vol, vWh 12 39 912 41 45 988 Conflicting Pods. Nhr 0 0 0 4 0 0 Sign Camra! Stop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Cbarinei Led 3 318 Yield Yield None Storage Length 0 a - 585 695 - Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 - 0 - - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Fkaw 13 42 991 45 49 1074 m4or1Mlitibt milia 11 _ Magi �ftr2 1111k Conflicting Flow All 2163 991 0 0 991 0 Stage 1 991 - Stage 2 1172 - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 8.22 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 6.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3 318 2 713 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 52 29t 696 Stage 1 359 - - Stage 2 294 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 46 299 698 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 48 Stage 1 359 Stage 2 273 - - Approach WB N8 SB H'IPA Con (raI Delay, s 39 4 a 0.5 HCM LOS F Mligor Laneg-Aajar Mvnit NBT °NBRVY8U1WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (vetalh) - 48 299 698 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.272 4.142 0.47 HCM GartFol delay {s} - 105.9 19 10.8 f4CM Lane LDS F C B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 0.9 4-5 0.2 5:00 prn Baseline Synchs 19 Report PeqA 14 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service, NB Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 2024 AM W p4�2&2020 Arterial Flow Running Signal Travel Dst Arterial Arterial c es Sheet Class Seed Time Del Time, s mi Speed LOS Lako Street 111 30 41.2 75.9 117.1 4.32 10.4 F F'uapueenui SC III 30 10?_ta 15.5 123.4 4.90 26.2 9 Total 111 148.8 q� 1.4 244.2 122 18.3 C Arterial Level cf Service: SB ween Kaahurnanu Hwy Arterial Flaw Running Signal Travel Dist Artarial Artedol Cross street Class Speed Tkne Delay Time (s) (mid Speed LOS Puapueattui St III 30 441.3 5.6 99.9 0.79 28.3 B Lala Street III Total 5:00 pm Baseline 30 107.6 31.9 1K 5 0 9D 23.1 v 2019 37.5 239,4 1.58 25.3 Synchs 14 Report Page 1 Arterial Level of Service Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial 2024 PM W Ti ne Delay Time (s) (M1� Speed LOS Puapuaattui St III 30 841.3 OV28I2020 Arterial Level of Service, NB Queen Kaahumanu Hwy C.79 28.2 B Lala Street III 30 107.6 38.1 Aerial: Flow. Runni19. Signal Tr"I bisi; ArlbMal MOO Gass Sheet Ctrs Spin lrnZ. � I]e1 + Tlirre (s) ��i� : —0.32 deed L Lako Street: 111 30 41.2 46.5 87.7 13.3 E Puapuaenui St 111 30 107.6 17.1 124.7 0.90 25.9 B Total 111 148.8 63.6 212.4 1-22 20.7 O Arterial Level cf Service: SB ween Kaahurnanu Hwy Arterial Flaw Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial Gross Street Class Speed Ti ne Delay Time (s) (M1� Speed LOS Puapuaattui St III 30 841.3 5.9 1M.2 C.79 28.2 B Lala Street III 30 107.6 38.1 1-157 0 9Q 22.1 v Total III 2019 44.0 245.9 1.58 24.8 B 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 1 Appendix F Analysis Reports — Future Without Project Conditions (2029) HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2029 AM WO 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 1012872019 f- t \i► 41 Movement EK EBT RR WK WBT V'WER NUL NBT NBR SB SBT S5R Lane COnfiquraGons ff r tf r tt r ft r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 78 505 241 180 749 25 268 212 120 22 355 196 FLltkire Volume (vehPh) 78 505 241 180 749 25 268 212 120 22 355 196 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.40 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1737 1767 1737 1841 1811 1841 1841 1870 1656 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 80 515 0 184 764 D 273 216 0 22 362 0 Peak Hour Factor 01.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 965 1481 267 1612 367 8336 43 538 ArTrVa On Green 4.05 0.44 0.00 0.08 0.47 0.00 0.11 0.24 0.00 0.02 OAA 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1 Q 3401 3554 1572 1781 3554 1565 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 80 515 D 184 764 D 273 216 0 22 362 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1605 1678 1472 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 8.3 0.0 4.3 12.4 0.0 6.3 4.0 0.0 1.0 7.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 2.0 8.3 0.0 4.3 12,4 0.0 6.3 4.0 0,0 1.0 7.8 I}.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 1,00 1.00 1.010 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 165 1481 267 1612 367 836 43 538 VPC Ratin(X) 049 0.35 0.69 0.47 074 0.26 0.51 0.67 Avail Cap(c..a), vehlh 244 1481 434 1612 597 2053 120 16169 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 111 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1,00 0.010 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 100 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slush 376 15.0 0.0 36.6 14.8 0.0 35.3 25.4 0.0 393 327 00 Inca Delay (d2), s}vsh 2.2 0.6 0.0 3.2 1.0 0.0 3.0 0.2 0.0 9.2 1.5 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 4,0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 00 0.0 We t3ack=(50%),vahlln 0.8 10 0.0 is 4.6 O,D 2.7 1.7 0,0 0.5 3.4 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(dl sJveh 398 15.7 O.D 39.8 15,8 0.0 38.3 25.5 0.0 48,5 34.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 595 A 948 A 489 A 384 A Approach Delay, sfveh 18.9 20.5 32.6 35.0 Approach 'LOS B C C C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.5 23.7 10.9 40.5 13.3 16-8 8.7 42.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5-5 47.1 10.4 34.0 14.3 38.3 6.2 38.2 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11j, s 3.0 6.0 6.3 10.3 8.3 9.8 4.0 14.4 Green Ext Time (p c), s D 0 1,5 Q.2 3.4 0,5 2,5 0.0 5.4 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 14.9 HC'M 6th LOS Butes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and interseetlon delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2029 AM WO 2; Henry St & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 1012$72019 ..# __. #- t Movement EK EBT HR W9 W8T WGR N131- NBT NRR SB4. SB_1 SBS Lane CanfiquratIons ++ r f+ r 4t r 1 4_� Traffic Volume (vph) 118 397 137 57 633 516 161 372 46 400 374 137 Future Volume (vph) 118 397 137 57 633 515 161 372 46 400 374 137 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 190D 1900 1940 19M 19DO 1900 19W Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane tail. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 097 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 tl.99 1.00 1,00 0-99 1.00 1,00 D.99 1-00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.QD 1.00 1.00 10) 1.W 1.00 1.010 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fd 100 1,00 085 100 1,07 0.85 1.00 1l,00 0.85 100 097 FIt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.04 1.04 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. How (prof) 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1545 1554 3347 1487 1595 3 17 4 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,0D 0.95 1.00 1.0D 095 0.99 Satd. Flaw (perm) 3099 3.282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3347 1487 1595 3174 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. HOW (vph) 122 409 141 59 653 532 166 381 47 412 3813 141 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 97 0 0 379 0 0 38 0 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 122 409 44 59 653 153 149 441 9 313 644 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 2 2 4 3 3 4 Gonfl (likes. (#Ihr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (9taj 13°x6 13% 5 6% 6% 3% 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 B 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.6 30.4 34.4 4.1 27.9 27.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 25.5 25.5 EffecDve Green, g (s) 6.6 30.4 34.4 4.1 27.9 27.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 25.5 25.5 Actuated WC Ratio 0-07 0.31 0.31 0.04 0,29 0.29 0,20 0,20 0,20 0.26 0.26 Clearance Tinge (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vpb) 211 1029 475 139 980 445 305 652 290 419 835 Ws Ratio Prat a0_04 0.12 0.02 c0.19 0.10 c0.12 00.20 0.19 Os Putin Perm 0.03 11.10 0.01 Wo Ratio 0.58 0.40 0,09 042 0.67 0.34 0.49 0.62 0,03 0.75 072 Uniform Delay, di 43.8 26.1 23.5 45.2 30.4 27.3 34.7 35.7 31.6 32.7 32.5 Pragras8ion Factor 100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1..00 1 CC lrlcremental Delay, d2 38 T 1 GA 21 3,6 2.1 1.2 1.7 0,0 T 1 3 1 Delay (s) 47.6 27.2 23.9 47.3 34.0 29.4 35.9 37.4 31.6 39.9 35.6 Level of Sarvice d C C D C C D D C d D Approach Delay (s) 30.2 32.6 36.6 37.0 Approach LOS C C D D llnb% otion Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 34 0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,£7 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 96.9 Sum of lost tune (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Sarvioe C Analysis Peiod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 AM WO 3: Hualalai Fid (North)_10128019 totomectian Int N18y, slveh 208 Movement EMI BAR NOL NBT 85T SBR 1 Lane Contiguralmns I r 523 + } r Tralfir, V431. u" 49 53 181 1088 957 33 Future Vol, vWh 49 53 181 1088 857 33 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Cantrat Stop Stmt Free Free Free Free RT CbannWl Led . Free - None Yield Storage Length 140 0 650 700 Veh in Median Storage. # 0 - - It D - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 0 Stage 2 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 Mvmt Fkaw 53 t 7 195 1170 922 35 M-OrWincr Minar2 Y& 11 Major2 Conflicting Flaw All 73 523 0 0 Stage 1 923 - Stage 2 1560 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver -33 0 740 Stage 1 387 0 - - Stage 2 190 0 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -24 - 739 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -24 - Stage 1 28+4 . Stage 2 190 - - - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Con (raI Delay, s$ 393 5 17 0 HCM LOS F Minor'Lanegvlajar Mvnit htBL I RT' p n1 FB02 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 739 24 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.263 2.195 - HCM CrunFol Delay {s} 116 -S8935 0 PGM Lane LDS B F A, HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 11.1 6.6 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 AM WO 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 10128019 tritemeethn Int N18y, slveh 5 t Movement VYBL WBR NBT NBR SBL 5BT Lane Conliguralmns j Traffir, V431. v" 10 Future Vol, vehlh 10 Conflicting Pods. #jhr 0 Sign Cantral Stop RT CbarinWiLed 0 ,Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage. # 0 Grade. % 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 Mvmt Fkaw 11 r T 155 1111 17 155 1111 17 4 0 0 Slap Free Free Stop Yie!d - 0 - 93 93 93 2 2 13 167 1195 18 81 825 81 826 0 0 Free Frea - None 0 - - 0 93 93 5 � 87 686 14crimili t_ Whorl � MaWl Maj Conflicting Flew All 2266 1204 0 0 1195 0 Stage 1 1244 - Stage 2 1062 - - - - Critioal Hdwy (5.42 6.22 - 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.518 3 318 2.254 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 45 224 570 Stage 1 284 - - - Stage 2 332 - Platoen blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 38 224 - 570 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 38 Stage 1 28+4 Stage 2 281 - - Approach we N9 SB H'IPA Control Delay. s f 1 4 L 1 1 HCM LOS F Nor Laneg-AajdrMvnit NBT N13RVdBLn1W8I-n2 SBL SET Capacity (vetalh) 3a 224 570 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.283 4.744 0.153 HCM CarilmJ Delay {s} - 133.6 56.7 12.5 - f4CM Lane LDS F F B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 0.9 5-1 0.5 - 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 6 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2029 AM WO 5; Puapueanui St 'IM82019 Movement Mo ment M *6R N8T NBR SBL 87 Lane CanliquraGons r f 1i" I + Traffic Volume (vehlh) 95 2004 942 27 47 793 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 95 204 942 27 47 793 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.D0 1.40 1.00 1.00 1,DD Work Zane On Approach No No 90 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1826 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 102 D 1002 0 50 844 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 3 2 2 5 Cap, vehlh 131 1397 67 1527 ArrlVa On Green 0.07 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.04 0.84 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1566 18% 1585 1781 1826 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 102 0 1 D02 0 50 B44 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1781 1585 1856 1585 1781 1826 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 0.0 28.8 0.0 2.8 14.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 5.6 0.0 28.8 0.0 2.8 14.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 t.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 131 1397 67 1527 VPC Ratin(X) 078 0.72 0.74 0.55 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehPh 323 9397 117 1527 HOM Platoon rube 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.0Q 1,00 O00 1.00 1,00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 45.2 0.D 6.6 0.0 47.3 2.5 Inca Delay (d2), shah 9.7 0.0 3.2 0.0 15.01 1.4 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(50%),vah1ln 2.8 0.0 9.8 00 1.5 3.2 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),sJveh 549 0.0 S8 D 0 62.3 3.9 LoGrp LOS D A E A Approach Vol, vehlh 102 A 1002 A 894 Approach Delay, sfveh 54.9 9.8 7.2 Approach 'LOS D A A Turner - Assigned 'Plan 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 79.3 87.5 11.8 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 72.4 83.D 16.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 4.8 30.8 16.D 6 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 11,1 8.4 0.2 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 11,9 HC'M 6th LOS B Notes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2029 AM WO 6: Kuakini Street 1012812019 tritomeiciinn Int N18y, sVveh 16 1 Movement EBL BSR INK NBT SBT SBR Lane Contiguralmns I r + + r Tralfir, V{}I, v" 8 187 571 885 810 67 Future Vol, vWh 8 187 571 885 810 07 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Frea RT CbannWi Led • Free None Yield ,Storage Length 160 0 630 700 Veh in Median Sicrage, # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 4 2 5 5 7 Mvmt Fkaw 9 201 614 952 871 72 m9liarl�Alii�i'ol`Mihm22 M1 ^Maj ort Conflicting Flew All 3051 871 0 0 Stage 1 871 - Stage 2 2180 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 14 0 774 Stage 1 410 0 - - Stage 2 93 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -3 - 774 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -3 Stage 1 85 Stage 2 93 - Approach EB N B SB H'IPA Con (raI Delay, 6 7938 5 98 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlajar 4lunit NEL NBT E7 n 1 EBLn2 SBT SRR Capacity (vetalh) 774 3 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.793 2.867 - HCNI GanFol Delay {s} 25 52938.5 0 PGM Lane LDS C F A, HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 8.2 2.2 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 202 JAM WO T Lako Street !,J -Y 812019 � � � Movement HIL EBT SBR WK WBT WHIR NIL NST N8R SBL SBT SEAR Lane COnfiquraGons tr 1� t r t iN Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 277 53 76 76 40 295 36 875 61 155 715 138 Future Volume (vehPh) 277 53 76 76 40 295 36 875 61 1:56 7'5 1:3i Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.40 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.ou Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 187D 1870 1870 1641 1811 1656 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 295 56 0 81 4.3 D 38 931 D t66 761 0 Peak Hour Factor 07.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap.vehlh 325 341 119 126 281 941 191 993 ArrrVa On Green 0.18 4.18 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.03 0.50 0.00 0.06 0.53 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1585 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 295 56 D 81 43 0 38 931 0 166 761 D Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 fi585 0 Serve(g_s), s 16.0 2.5 0.0 4.4 2.2 0.0 1.0 48.6 0.0 4.8 31.9 0.0 Cyan Q clea(cg-r), S 16.4 2.5 0.0 4.4 2.2 0.0 1.0 48.6 G.0 4.8 31.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 0.00 1 0o 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1:00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 325 341 119 126 281 941 191 9S3 VPC Ratin(X) 091 0.18 0} 68 0.34 014 0.99 0187 077 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 326 341 323 341 313 941 191 993 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.010 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.010 ion 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 (7.00 1.00 1.04 01.00 Uniform Delay (d). slush 39.5 34.0 0.0 45.0 43.9 0.0 15.3 243 0.0 24.3 18.1 0.0 Inca Delay (d2), shah 27.8 0.2 0.0 67 1_6. 0.0 0_2 27.0 0_0 32.3 5.7 0.01 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 Q.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 01.0 0.0 0,0 We t3ackD# (0%),vahlln 9.4 1,3 0.0 21 1.1 0.D 014 27.0 0.0 36 143 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(dl sJveh 673 34.2 0.0 617 45.5 0.0 15.5 513 0.0 56.6 23.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C D D B 0 E C Approach Vol, vehlh 351 A 124 A 969 A 927 A Approach Delay, shah 62.0 49.5 49.9 29.6 Approach 'LOS E. D D C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 0 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 54.1 22.5 7.7 57.3 11.1 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4,5 45 4.5 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.4 49.6 16.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_C+l1), s 6.8 50.6 18.0 3.0 33.9 6.4 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 5.2 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 417 HC'M 6th LOS D Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjon Summary 2029 AM WO 8; Kamehameha fill Road Queen Keahumanu Hwy 'M8019 WVement SBL EST RR WK WBT WHIR NBL H13T NOR SaL SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r 1+ fT Traffic Volume (vehlh) 173 5 29 18 13 17 84 52.5 17 15 461 315 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 173 6 29 18 13 17 84 525 17 15 461 315 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,40 1,OD 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1722 1781 1781 1781 1752 1811 1611 1870 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 185 6 0 19 14 18 90 565 18 16 496 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 12 8 8 8 10 6 6 2 6 6 Cap, vehlh 249 8 27 20 26 114 915 29 34 1638 ArrlVa On Green 0.14 4.14 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.07 0.52 0.52 0.02 048 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1728 55 1459 502 444 570 1668 1744 56 1781 3532 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 192 0 0 5t 0 0 90 0 583 16 496 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1784 0 1459 1616 0 D 1668 0 1800 1781 1721 0 Q Serve(g_s), s r .4 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 15.4 0.6 6.0 0.0 Cycle Q clea(c,-c), s 70 0.0 0.0 2.1 0,0 0.0 3.6 0.0 15.4 0.6 6.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 097 1.00 027 0.35 1.00 0.+03 100 000 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 258 0 74 0 0 114 0 94+4 34 16M VPC Ratin(X) 075 0.0D 0.69 0.00 0.00 079 0.00 0.62 047 0.30 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 683 4 609 0 0 224 0 944 134 1638 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.0d 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01} 1.00 1.40 1.001 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 100 000 0.00 1.00 0,00 0.00 1.00 0.04 1.06 1.80 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 277 4.6 4 D 31.8 4.0 0.0 31 1 D.0 11.3 32.8 1D9 O,D Inca Deiay (d2), shah 4.3 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 11.6 0.0 3.0 95 05 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.D I}.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,{l We Back=(0%),vahnn 31 0.0 0,0 10 0.0 0.D 17 00 6,4 0.3 1.9 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 320 0.0 O.D 428 0,0 0.0 42.7 0.0 14.3 42.5 11.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Approach Vol, vehlh 192 A 51 673 512 A Approach Delay, sfveh 32.0 42.8 18.1 12.3 Approach 'LOS C D B B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.3 9.1 36.7 7.6 5.8 40.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 25.9 9.1 31.5 25.5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 9.0 6.6 8.0 4.1 2.6 17.4 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.9 0.1 3.0 0,2 0.0 3.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 18.8 HCM 6th LOS B Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report peqA 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2029 PM WO 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 10128019 Movement SBL EBT FSR 4VINL WBT WER RK NBT NPR SBI, SB i SBS Lane CanfiquraGons tt 1 tt r tt r tt F Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 287 9619 556 246 673 45 251 313 273 55 346 11B Future Volume (vehPh) 287 969 556 246 673 45 251 313 273 56 346 118 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.136 1.00 1.DD 1.40 1.40 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1.00 1.Q0 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 op Work Zane On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1856 1856 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1870 1670 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 293 989 D 251 687 D 256 319 0 57 353 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.38 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 4.98 0.98 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 3hi 1527 336 1466 340 743 78 548 ArT[Va On Green 0.11 0.43 0.00 4.10 0.42 0.00 0.10 0.21 0.00 0.04 0.15 0.00 Sat Flow yahPh 3428 3526 1585 3456 3437 1585 3428 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 293 gag 0 251 687 D 256 319 D 57 353 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 18.4 0.0 5.9 11.8 0.0 6.0 6.5 0.0 2.6 7.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 6.9 18.4 4.0 5.9 11.8 0.0 6.0 6.5 0.0 2.6 7.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 1,00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 381 1527 336 1466 340 743 78 548 VPC Ratin(X) 077 0.65 0.75 0.47 075 0.43 073 0.64 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 516 1527, 437 1466 433 1779 191 1710 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.010 0.00 1.00 1.00 &OD 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1_t101 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). slveh 35.9 18.6 0.0 36.5 175 0.D 36.5 286 0.0 392 33.0 00 Inca Delay (d2), shah 4.8 2.1 0.0 5.1 1.1 O.D 5.5 0.4 0.0 12.0 1.3 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 O.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(50%),vahnn 3.0 7,3 0.0 26 46 O.D 27 27 0,0 1.4 3.4 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),sJveh 40.7 20,7 00 41.6 18.5 0.0 42.0 289 0.0 51 3 343 0 D LnGrp LOS D C D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 1282 A 938 A 575 A 41D A Approach Delay, sfveh 25.3 24.7 34.8 36.7 Approach 'LOS C C C D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 21.9 12.6 40.5 12.7 17.3 13.7 39.3 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 45 4.5 45 4.5 45 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.9 41.6 10.5 36.0 10.5 40.0 12,5 34.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_C+11), s 4.5 8.5 7,9 20A 8.0 9.8 8.9 13.8 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2,2 02 6.2 0,2 2.5 0.3 4.5 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.3 HC'M 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized intersection Capacity Analysis 2029 PM WO 2; Henry St & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 10P28f2019 Wvemont ESL EBT M W9 WRT WER N131- NBT NRR SBL SBT SRO Lane CanfiquratIons ++ r tf r 4t r 1 4-� Traffic Volume (vph) 210 732 321 80 605 347 139 351 38 384 378 210 Future Volume (vph) 210 732 321 80 605 347 139 351 38 384 378 210 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 19W 1900 1900 1900 19DO 1900 1900 Total Lost time (8) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ut 1. Factor 4,97 0.95 1.(10 097 0.95 1,01) 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,94 091 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1,00 0.99 1.00 1,00 0.98 1-00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbike8 1.00 1.Q17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.630 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 Fri 1.00 1,00 085 100 1,00 0.85 1.00 1,00 9.85 100 095 Flt Protected 03.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 03.95 1.00 Satd.How (prot) 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3383 1537 1610 3193 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,00 0.95 1.90 1.00 01.95 1.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 3335 35.39 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3383 1537 1610 3193 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.58 Adj. HOW (vph) 2M 747 328 $2 617 354 142 358 39 392. 386 214 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 221 0 0 255 a 0 32 9 4.5 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 214 747 107 82 617 99 128 372 7 333 614 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Gonfl Bikes. (#Ihr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (95) 5% 2% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed Pha8es 7 4 3 B 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8:6 32..2 32.2 3.9 27.5 27.5 18.1 18.1 18.1 26,2 26.2 Effective Green, g (s) 8.6 32.2 32.2 3.9 27.5 27.5 18.1 18.1 18.1 26.2 26.2 Actuated WC Ratio 0,09 0,33 0.33 0,04 0,28 0.28 0.18 0,18 0,18 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extensian (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.D 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap (vpb) 291 1158 518 136 970 435 293 622 282 428 850 Ws Ratio Prat 010.06 00.21 0.02 0.18 b.08 00.11 00.21 0.19 Os HOW Perm 0.07 11.05 0.00 Wo Ratio 0.74 0,65 0.21 060 0.64 0.23 0.44 0,60 0.03 0.78 0,72 Uniform Delay, di 43.8 28.2 23.9 46.5 31.1 27.3 35.6 36.8 32.9 33.4 32.8 Pragres8ion Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1,01 1.00 1.[30 lrncremental Delay, d2 93 2.8 0.9 73 3.2 12 10 16 0.0 8.7 3.0 Delay (s) 53.1 31.4 24.6 53.8 34.2 28.5 35.7 38.4 33.0 42.1 35.8 Level of Sarvice D C C D C C ❑ D C f] D Approach Delay (s) 33,1 33.8 376 37.9 Approach LOS C G D D 1nb%UoWn Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,71 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 98.4 Sum of lost Gma (U) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 15.6% ICU Level of Sarvioe t9 Analysis Peiod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 PM WO 3: Hualalai Fid (North)_1012812019 tritomeiciinn Int N18y, slveh 1 4 Moment EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1 Lane Contiguralmns j 1144 0 0 Stage 1 Tra'ttiG V431, v" 11 77 93 1020 1110 19 Future Vol, vWh 11 77 93 1020 1110 19 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Camra! Stop Slap Free Free Free Frea RT CbarinW Led - Free .1 None Yield Storage Length 140 0 450 700 Veh in Median Sibrage. # 0 - 611 0 - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 0 Stage 2 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 4 2 5 Mvmt Fkaw 11 79 96 1052 114E 20 Mgjarlmllibl _ MiNx2 mi Maj ort Conflicting Flow All 2388 1144 0 0 Stage 1 114+4 Stage 2 1244 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 37 0 611 Stage 1 304 0 - - Stage 2 272 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 31 - 511 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 31 Stage 1 256 Stage 2 272 - - - Approach E13 NB 8B Hr"PA Control Delay, s 177 11 t 0 HCM LOS F M Nor Laneg-fl ajar Mvnit N81L IQT',QI.,n 1 FBLn2 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 611 31 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.157 C U:rj HCU Garitrol Delay {s} 12 71, 1 F f4CM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tiler € lNeh) 0.6 1.2 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 PM WO 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 10128019 tritemeiciinn Int N18y, slveh Movement 2 3 W13 WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT t Lane Contiguralians j 0 1070 0 Stage 1 1072 Traffic, V{}I, v" 15 78 1038 4 67 1121 Future Vol, vehlh 15 78 1036 4 67 1121 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Frea RT Cbarinei Led - Step Yield - None Storage Length 4 a 629 0 - Veh in Median Sbrage, # 0 - 0 - - {) Grade. % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 Mvmt Fkaw 15 80 1074 4 69 1156 mom_ .. WWI Ma t Major2� Conflicting Flew All 2366 1072 0 0 1070 0 Stage 1 1072 _ - _ Stage 2 1294 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.47 6,22 - 4.18 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.47 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.47 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 3.318 2.272 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 37 268 629 Stage 1 322 - - - Stage 2 251 - - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 33 2,58 - - 629 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 33 - - Stage 1 322 Stage 2 223 Approach WB N9 SB H'IPA Con Ira I Daley. s 58 5 0 06 HCM LOS F M Nor Laneg-Aajar Mvnit NBT N13RVVBLnIW8Ln2 ;SBL SET Capacity (vetalh) 33 268 829 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.469 0.3 0.11 HCM Garilml Delay {s} - 187.7 .24-1 11.4 - f4CM Lane LDS F C B - HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 1-6 1.2 0.4 - 5:00 prn Baseline Symhro 10 Report Pogo 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2129 PM WO 5; Puapueanui St 10P28019 Movement WK VVOR N8T NBR Sl3L GBT Lane CanliquraGons r t I Traffic Volume (vehlh) 38 118 911 53 146 1001 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 38 118 911 53 146 1001 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 9.00 1.Q0 1,00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No 90 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1870 1825 1856 1841 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 39 4 939 0 151 1032 Peak Hour Factor 0-97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 4.97 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 5 3 4 2 2 Cap, vehlh 60 1338 184 1630 ArrlVa On Green 0.03 0.04 0.72 0.00 0.10 0.87 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1647 1956 1560 1781 1870 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 39 0 939 0 151 1032 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.1 0.0 21.2 0.0'.9 15.0 Cycle Q Clear(c,-c), s 2.1 0.0 27.2 0.0 7.9 15.0 Prop In Lane too 1.04 100 t 00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 60 1338 164 t630 VPC Ratin(X) 065 0.70 0.82 0.63 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 337 1338 253 1634 HOM Platoon maria 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1,00 Ono 1.04 1.OG Uniform Delay (d). slveh 454 0.0 75 0.0 418 1 7 Incr Delay (d2), shah 11.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 140 1.9 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 GO 0.0 0.0 0.0 We l3ackD# (0%),vah1ln 1.1 0.0 9.7 00 4.2 2.1 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(dl sJveh 565 0.0 14.6 0.0 55.9 3.5 LoGrp LOS 8 E A Approach Vol, vehlh 39 A 939 A 1183 Approach Delay, sfveh 56.5 10.6 10.3 Approach LOS E B B Turner - Assigned 'Plan 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.3 73.2 87.6 7.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 65.0 83.0 18.4 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 9.9 29.2 17.0 4.1 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 9.4 12.7 0.0 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 11.:3 HC'M 6th LOS 8 Notes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 PM WO 6: Kuakini Street 1012812019 tritemeethn Int N18y, slveh 4.3 Movement EMI EBR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Contiguralmns I r + + r TralfiG V431, vetti(h 14 411 268 943 PRO 4{} Future Vol, vWh 14 411 268 943 980 40 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stats Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led • Free None Yield Storage Length 160 0 636 700 Veh in Median Sicrage. # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 96 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % S 2 2 3 2 6 Mvmt Fkaw 14 419 273 962 1000 41 mgjarlmll i'bl _. Mihor2�Ma ri Majgr2 Conflicting Flew All 2508 1000 0 0 Stage I Iwo - Stage 2 1508 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.48 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.48 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.48 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 2.218 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 30 0 692 Stage 1 347 0 - - Stage 2 196 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 98 - 692 Mery Cap -2 Maneuver 18 Stage 1 210 Stage 2 196 Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Con Ira I Delay. s$ 429 8 3 0 HCM LOS F Minor LaneJP-Hajar 4lunit N8L N8T EBLnI EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (vetalh) 692 18 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.395 0.794 HCtvl CrunFol Delay {s} 136 $ 429 8 0 PGM Lane LDS B F A, HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 1.9 2.1 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2029 PM WO T (_ak0 Street 10P2812019 Movement RL BBT EBR WSL WBT WIRR NBL NSA" NOR SSL SBI• SER Lane CCnfiquraGons 1� I ''k `1` r I 't` Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 140 33 53 68 43 213 41 833 71 204 969 188 Future Volume (vehPh) 140 33 53 68 43 213 41 833 T1 200 969 188 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D u 0 D 0 0 D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.OQ 1,00 1.Qo 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 op Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1841 1870 1870 1870 1826 1826 1856 1656 1870 1855 1810 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 146 34 0 71 45 D 43 868 D 208 1009 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.06 0.96 0.96 4.98 0.96 0.% 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.56 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap.vehlh 187 200 109 112 206 1024 312 1099 ArrrVa On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.04 0.55 O.00 0.07 0.59 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1753 1870 0 1781 1026 0 1767 1 6 1565 1767 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 146 34 0 71 45 0 43 868 0 208 1009 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh3ln 1753 1870 D 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s r .0 t.4 0.0 34 2.1 0.0 0.9 34.2 0.0 4.3 41.9 0.0 Cycle Q clear(c,-c), s T 0 1.4 0.0 3.4 Zi 0.0 0.5 34.2 0.0 4.3 41.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1 00 0.00 1 00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 187 200 109 112 206 1424 312 1099 VPC Ratin(X) 078 0 17 0.65 0.44 0.21 01.85 0.67 0.92 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 364 388 369 379 243 1024 352 1099 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 100 1.010 0.00 1.40f 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). atveh 3T 8 35.3 0.0 39.8 39.2 0,0 15.9 16.4 00 16.9 16.0 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 6.9 0.4 0.0 64 2.3 0.0 0.5 8.7 0.0 4.1 13.5 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 Q.0 00 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We Back=(50%),vahlln 3.3 0.7 0.0 17 10 O.D 04 164 0.0 25 19.6 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),slveh 444.7 35.7 O.D 46.3 41.6 0.0 17.4 25.1 0.0 21 0 29.5 0.0j LnGrp LOS D D D D B C i, C Approach Vol, vehlh 180 A 116 A 911 A 1217 A Approach Delay, shah 43.0 44.4 24.7 28.1 Approach 'LOS D D 0 C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.8 52.4 13.8 7.7 55.5 9.8 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4,5 4.5 4.5 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.3 47.7 16.0 5.0 51.0 16.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_C+11), s 6.3 36.2 5.0 2.9 43.9 5.4 Green Ext Time (p c), s 01 5.0 03 01.0 4.2 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.7 HCM 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t t HCM 6th Signalized Intersect on Summary 2029 PM WO 8; Kameh2meha III Road & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 1012812019 Movement BBQ EBT RR WK WRT WEE N8I_ NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane CanfiquraGons 2 4 r 6 7 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 1� 8.7 I +T+ 6.2 Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 320 12 57 8 12 20 71 547 12 19 564 314 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 320 12 57 8 12 2D 71 547 17 19 564 314 lnitial Q (0b), vah 4 0 0 0 4 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1,OD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 10 1,D0 1.06 100 1,00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1767 1767 1811 1870 1870 1670 1856 1656 1956 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 337 13 0 a 13 21 75 576 13 20 594 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.05 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.955 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 9 9 6 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 393 15 12 20 33 96 840 19 40 1537 ArrlVa On Green 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.04 0.44 0.04 0.05 0.46 0.46 0.02 0.43 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1623 63 1535 324 527 851 1767 1807 41 1781 3647 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 350 D 0 42 0 D 75 0 589 20 594 0 Grp Sat Ftow(s),vehlhlln 1685 0 1535 1701 0 0 1767 0 1848 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 15.4 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 €3.0 3.2 0.0 19.4 0.9 8.8 0.0 Cycle Q clear(c,-c), s 15.4 0.0 0.0 19 0.0 0.0 3.2 0,0 19.4 0.9 8.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 096 1.00 0 19 0,50 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 408 0 65 0 b 96 0 859 40 1537 VPC Ratin(X) 086 0.00 064 000 0.00 078 0.00 0.69 0.50 0.39 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 564 4 660 0 0 162 0 859 117 1537 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 4.00 100 0.00 6.00 1.00 4.04 1.06 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slush 28.1 O.D 0.0 36.7 0.0 0.0 361 0.0 16.3 37.4 15.0 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s}vsh 9.4 0.0 0.0 101 0.0 0.0 12.7 0.0 4.4 9.2 0.7 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 Go 0.0 0.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We 13ack=(50%),vahlln 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 O. D 17 0.0 7.9 0.5 3.2 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 3T 5 0.0 O.D 46.8 0.0 0.D 48.8 0.0 20.7 45.6 15.7 O D LnGrp LOS D A D A A D A D B Approach Vol, vehlh 350 A 42 664 614 A Approach Delay, sfveh 37.5 46.8 23.9 16.7 Approach 'LOS D D C B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.2 8.7 38.0 7.5 6.2 40.5 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 45 45 4.5 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.9 7.1 33.5 25,5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 17.4 5.2 10.8 3.9 2.9 21.4 Green Ext Time (p o), s 1.4 4.0 37 0.1 0.0 3.0 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 24.7 HCM 6th LOS C Mutes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 Appendix G Analysis Reports — Future With Project Conditions (2029) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2929 AM W project 1: Palanl Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 1311312020 Movement 1=91 EBT RR 4VINL W8T WPR NBL NBT NBR SB SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons tt r t+ iff tt r ft r Traffic Volume (vehlh) 1'8 512 241 181: 787 34 258 212 122 22 355 196 FLltkire Volume (vehPh) 78 `12 241 181 787 34 268 212 127 22 355 196 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1.40 1.Oa 1,00 1,00 1.40 1.04 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,OD Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1737 1767 1737 1841 1811 1841 1841 1870 1656 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh so 522 D 185 803 D 273 216 D 22 362 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 165 1480 268 1612 367 836 43 538 ArTrVa On Green 0.05 0.44 0.00 0.08 0.47 0.00 0.11 0.24 0.00 0.02 OAA 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1 0 3401 3554 1572 1781 3554 1565 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 80 522 4 185 803 D 273 216 0 22 362 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1605 1678 1472 1700 1721 156{} 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 8.4 0.4 4.3 13.2 0.0 5.3 4.0 0.0 1.0 7.8 0.0 Cycle Q clea(c,-c), s 2.0 8.4 0.0 4.3 13.2 0.0 6.3 4.0 0.0 1.0 7.8 I}.0 Prop In Lane 100 1. CIO 100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 165 1480 268 1612 367 836 43 538 VPC Ratin(X) 049 0.35 0.69 0.50 074 0.26 0.51 0.67 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 244 1420 434 1612 597 2053 120 16169 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). atveh 376 15.1 0.0 36.6 150 0.0 35.3 25.4 0.0 39.3 327 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 2.2 0.7 0.0 3.2 1.1 0.0 3.0 0.2 0.0 9.2 1.5 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We t3ackD# (0%),vahAn 0.8 3.1 0.0 19 4.9 O.D 2.7 1.7 0,0 0.5 3.4 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(dl slveh 398 15.7 O.D 397 16,1 0.9 3a.3 25.5 6.0 48,5 34.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 602 A 988 A 489 A 384 A Approach Delay, sfveh 18.9 20.5 32.6 36:0 Approach 'LOS B C C C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.5 23.7 10.9 40.5 13.3 16-8 8.7 42.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4,5 4.5 45 4.5 4.5 45 4,5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5-5 47.1 10,4 34.0 14.3 38.3 6.2 38.2 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11j, s 3.0 6.0 6.3 10.4 8.3 9.8 4.0 15.2 Green Ext Time (p c), s D 0 1,5 02 3.5 0,5 2,5 0.0 5.7 Intersection Summary FILM 0th Ctrl Delay 14.6 HC'M 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and interseetlon delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2029 AM W project 2; Henry St & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 0311312020 Lane L1t 1. Factor ..# __. 1.00 f- 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 t 4� Wvement EK EBT HR WK W8T WGR NIL NBT NRR SBL SBT 5130 Lane CanfiquraGons 1.00 tf r 1.00 f+ I 1.00 4t r 1 4_� Traffic Volume (vph) 118 4M 137 61 711 554 161 372 47 409 374 137 Future Volume (vph) 118 406 137 61 711 554 161 372 47 409 374 137 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900. 1000 1900 190D 1900 1940 19M 19DO 1900 19W Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane L1t 1. Factor 0.97 0,95 1.00 097 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frpb: pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 G.99 1.00 1,00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.99 1-00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.QD 1.00 1.00 10) 1.W 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 100 1,00 085 100 1,07 0.85 1.00 1l,00 0.85 100 097 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.95 3.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. How (prof) 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1545 1554 3347 1487 1595 3 17 4 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,0D 0.95 1.00 1.01) 095 0.99 Satd. Flaw (perm) 3099 3.282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3347 1487 1595 3174 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 122 419 141 63 733 571 166 381 48 422 386 141 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 97 0 0 407 0 0 39 0 21 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 122 419 44 63 733 164 149 441 9 316 612 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 2 2 4 3 3 4 Gonfl (likes. (#Ihr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (9taj 13°x6 13% 5 6% 6% 3% 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 B 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.6 30.4 34.4 4.1 27.9 27.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 25.7 25.7 EffecDve Green, g (s) 6.6 30.4 34.4 4.1 27.9 27.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 25.7 25.7 Actuated WC Ratio 0.07 0.31 0.31 0.04 0,29 0.29 0.19 0,19 0.19 0.26 0.26 Clearance Tinge (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap(vpb) 210 1027 474 139 978 444 304 fib1 289 422 840 Ws Ratio Prat x0.04 0.33 0.02 c0.22 0.10 0.12 c0_20 0.19 Os Putin Perm 0.03 11.11 47.01 Wo Ratio 0.58 0.41 0,09 045 0,75 0.37 0.49 0.62 0,03 0.75 0.73 Uniform Delay, di 43.9 26.3 23.6 45.4 31.4 27.6 34.8 35.8 31.7 32.7 32.5 Pragras8ion Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 1:.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.[14 lrlcremental Delay, d2 4.0 1.2 0,4 23 5.3 2.4 12 17 0,0 7,1 3.2 Delay (s) 48.0 27.5 24.0 47.7 36.7 29.9 35.1 37.5 31.7 39.9 35.7 Level of Sarvice D c C ❑ D c D D c D D Approach Delay (s) 30.4 344 36.7 37.1 Approach LOS C C 0 D llnb%ll otiorl Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,70 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 97.1 Surn of lost G in (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 71.4% ICU Level of Sarvioe C Analysis Pernod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2929 AM W project 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 0311312020 tritomeefion Int N18y, slveh 28.5 Movement EMI BAR NOL NBT 85T SBR Lane Contiguralmns j 543 0 {� Stage 1 Tralfir, V431. v" 49 54 1P6 1178 876 33 Future Vol, vWh 49 54 196 1173 876 33 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Cantrat Stop Stmt Free Free Free Free RT CbannWl Led • Free - None Yield Storage Length 140 0 650 700 Veh in Median Storage. # 0 - - 1} D - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 0 Stage 2 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 Mvmt Fkaw 53 58 211 1267 942 35 M-OrWincr Minar2 M1 Major2 Conflicting Flaw All 2632 543 0 0 Stage 1 943 - Stage 2 1689 - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 61.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 1518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver -26 0 727 - Stage 1 379 0 - - - - Stage 2 164 0 - Platoon blocked. % _ Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 18 - 726i - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -18 - Stage 1 268 - Stage 2 164 - - Approach EB N9 SB HIIPA Control Delay. S 1311] 5 17 0 HCM LOS F Minor LaneJl`-Aajar Mvnit `j8L lQT' ,Kn 1 FB02 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 726 18 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.29 2.927 - HCM Canlml Delay {s} 12 S1310.5 0 PGM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 11.2 7.1 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 19 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2929 AM W project 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 0311312020 tritomeefion Int N18y, slweh 68 Movement W13 WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Contiguraliens j r T } TraffiG Vel, v" 10 155 1216 17 81 W Future Vol, vehlh 10 155 1216 17 81 846 Conflicting Pods. #jhr 6 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Step Free Free Free Free RT Channel Led . Stop Yield - None Storage Length 0 0 0 - Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 6 Mvmt Fkaw 11 167 130E 18 87 910 m4or1MliiotNltrtog'1 Mari ^Ma�M'2 Conflicting Flew All 2401 1317 0 0 1308 00 Stage 1 1317 - - - Stage 2 1084 - - - - Critioal Hdwy (5.42 6.22 - 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.518 3 318 2 254 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 37 193 516 Stage 1 250 - - - Stage 2 324 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 31 193 - - 515 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 31 - Stage 1 250 - Stage 2 269 - - Approach we 11413 SB Hr"PA Control Deiey. s 89 0 12 HCM LOS F Ml(qorLaneJl`-Aajar Mvmt NBT flRRW5i,n1WFSLn2 28L SFT _ Capacity (vehih) - 31 193 516 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.347 6.864 0.169 HCU Gartlrol Dolay {s} - 173.5 83.5 13.4 f4CM Lane LDS F F B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 1-1 6.4 0.6 - 5:00 prn Baseline Symhro 10 Report Fuge 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2929 AM W project 5; PUs' pueanui St 0311312020 WVement WK VVOR N8T NBR Sl3L SST Lane CanliquraGons r f in I t Traffic Volume (+vehlh) 98 204 1047 30 47 813 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 98 204 1647 30 47 813 Initial Q (0b), vat', 0 0 0 0 0 D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.04 1.00 1.40 100 1.00 I.DD Work Zane On Approach No No 90 Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1825 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 104 D 1114 0 50 865 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 4.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 3 2 2 5 Cap, vehlh 130 1446 64 1557 ArrlVa On Green 0.07 4.00 0.79 4.00 0.04 0.95 Sat Flow, vahPh 1781 1585 1856 1585 1781 1826 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 104 0 1114 0 50 865 Grp Sat Flow(s),ueh/un 1781 1585 1856 1585 1781 1826 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.9 0.0 40.1 0.0 3.4 16.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 6.9 0.0 40.1 0.0 3.4 16.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh1h 130 1446 64 1557 VPC Ratin(X) 0.80 0.77 0.78 0.55 !wait Cap(cw,a), vehPh 265 1446 96 1557 HOM Platoon maria 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1,00 Ono 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). aNeh 551 O.D 74 00 577 2.5 Inca Delay (d2), shah 10.7 0.0 40 00 20.2 1.4 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.D We Back=(50%),vah1ln 3.5 0.0 14.2 00 1.9 4.D Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),sJveh 659 0.0 114 0.0 78.0 3.9 LoGrp LOS L B E A Approach Vol, vehlh 104 A 1114 A 915 Approach Delay, sfveh 65.9 11.4 8.D Approach 'LOS E B A Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.9 98.61 107.5 13.3 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4.5 4.5 4,5 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 6.5 92.0 103.0 18A Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 5.4 42.1 18.0 8.9 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 14.6 83 0.1 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.6 HC'M 6th LOS B !dotes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2929 AM W project 6: Kuakirti Street O3113f2020 tritomeeiciinn Int t eiayr, sVveh 218 Movement EBL BAR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Contiguralmns I i" + + r Tralfir, V{}I, v" 8 187" 574 91Q 837 69 Future Vol, vWh 8 187 574 910 837 fig Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led - Free None Yield Storage Length 160 0 630 700 Veh in Median Sicrage, # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 4 2 5 5 r Mvmt Fkaw 9 201 617 978 900 74 Nt�j€mi ol`_ Minor.? Y&1 ^M49jcor2 Conflicting Flog Ali 3112 - 900 0 0 Stage I g00 Stage 2 2212 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 13 0 755 Stage 1 397 0 - - Stage 2 139 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -2 - 755 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -2 Stage 1 73 Stage 2 89 - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Con (raI Delay. S 4551; 6 if) 6 0 HCM LOS F Mlnor'Lanegvlajar 4tunit NCL NRT Z,BLn 1 E5Ln2 SB'T SBR Capacity (vetalh) 755 2 - HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.817 4.301 - HCV CrunFol delay {s} 27.4 S4556.6 0 - - HGM Lane LDS D F A HCM 95th %tile Gi;veh) 8.9 2.3 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2929 AM W project T l_oko Street 0311342020 Movement ESIL BBT SBR Wit, WBT WER NBL NSA" NRR SEIL $BT SBFT Lane CanfiquraGons 1 r 4 5 'k 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s t r I t r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 282 53 76 92 43 303 36 890 61 160 734 142 Future Volume (vehPh) 282 53 76 92 43 303 36 890 61 16D 734 142 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D D 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.0c 1.00 100 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,OD Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 9070 1641 1811 1856 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 340 56 0 98 46 0 38 547 0 170 781 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0." 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.04 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap,vehlh 313 329 131 139 291 10x8 202 1055 ArT[Va On Green 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.07 0.47 0.00 0.03 0.54 0.00 0.06 0.57 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1x356 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 300 56 0 98 46 0 38 947 0 170 781 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh,4n 1781 1870 0 1767 1874 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 T585 Q Serve(g_s), s t9.9 3.0 0.0 6.5 2.8 0.0 1.1 56.3 0.0 5.1 37.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 19.9 3.0 0.0 6.5 2.a 0.0 1.1 563 0,.0 5.1 37.3 0.0 Prop In Lane too 4,00 100 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 313 329 131 139 291 10178 202 1055 VPC Ratin(X) 096 0.17 0.75 0.33 013 0.94 084 0.74 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 393 329 275 291 312 1008 221 1055 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1,00 0.00 100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0,00 1.00 1.00 0.110 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 486 417 0.0 54.0 523 O.D 164 25.6 0.0 27.1 19 1 00 Inca Delay (d2), shah 39.8 0.2 0.0 8.1 1.4 0.0 0.2 17.1 0.0 23.0 4.7 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 O.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 We Back=(50%),vahAn 12.2 1.4 0.0 32 1.4 O.D 05 28.6 0,0 39 167 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl slveh 894 41.9 0.0 621 53.6 0.0 16.6 428 0.0 54.2 23.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D E D B 0 D C Approach Vol, vehlh 356 A 144 A 985 A 951 A Approach Delay, sfve h 81.1 59.4 4!.7 28,5 Approach 'LOS F E D C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.6 68.6 25.4 8.1 72.2 13.3 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s B_5 64.1 20.9 5.0 67.6 18.5 Max 0 Clear Time (g_C+11), s 7.1 58.3 21.9 3.1 39.3 8.5 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 3,3 0.0 0.0 6.5 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 414 HC'M 6th LOS D Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t 1 HCM 6th Signalized lntersectien Summary 2929 AM W project 8; Kamehameha lil Road Quem Ka humanu Hwy 0311312020 --- t+► t Movement ment SEL EBT RR WK WBT WER NEL NBT NSR SBS S131 5139 Lane CanfiquraGons 2 4 r 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 1 10.7 54.6 tt 6.2 Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 177 5 29 18 13 17 84 536 17 15 481 329 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 177 6 29 18 13 17 84 536 17 16 481 329 lnitial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1722 1781 1781 1781 1752 1811 1611 1870 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 190 6 0 19 14 18 90 576 15 17 517 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 12 8 8 8 10 6 6 2 6 6 Cap, vehlh 240 a 24 18 23 114 1062 33 34 1945 ArrrVa On Green 0.14 0.14 0.00 0.04 0.44 0.04 0.07 0.60 0.60 0.02 0.55 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1729 55 1459 500 442 566 1658 1745 55 1781 3532 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 196 0 0 51 0 D 90 0 594 17 517 0 Grp Sat Flowu(s),wehlhlln 1784 0 1459 1610 0 D 1665 0 18d1D 1781 1721 D 0 Serve(g_s), s 9.6 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 0.0 4.8 0.0 17.7 0.5 7.1 0.0 Cycle Q C[ear(c,-c), s 9.6 0,01 6.0 2.8 OL 0.0 4.8 0.0 17.7 0.9 7.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 097 1. CIO 097 0.35 1.00 0.03 100 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 248 0 65 0 0 114 0 10x5 34 1805 VPC Ratin6X) 079 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.00 079 0.00 0.55 0.50 027 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehPh 527 4 454 0 0 266 0 11M 104 Im HO:M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0,00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.0b 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 377 0.D 0.0 43.0 0,0 O.D 41.5 0.0 10.6 43.9 106 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 5.6 0.0 0.0 18.8 0.0 0.0 11.4 0.0 2.0 10.7 D_4 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We BackO) (50%),vahnn 4.5 0.0 0.0 15 0.0 O.D 22 0.0 63 0.5 2 4 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),sheh 433 0.0 01.0 619 0.0 O.0 52.9 0.0 12.6 54.6 11.0 O D LnGrp LOS D A E A A D A B D B Approach Vol, vehlh 196 A 51 684 534 A Approach Delay, sfveh 43.3 61.8 17.9 12.3 Approach 'LOS D E B B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 17.0 10.7 54.6 8.1 6.2 59.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 45 45 4.6 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 26,7 14.4 45.4 25.5 5.3 54.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 11.5 6.8 9.1 4.8 2.9 19 7 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.9 0.1 3.4 0,2 0.0 3.9 Intersection Summary FILM 0th Ctrl Delay 20.8 HCM 6th LOS G Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 HCM Sth TWSC 2929 AM W project 9: Kona Vista Roadway 0311312020 totomeiethn Int N18y, slveh 3 t Movement VYBL VVl3R NOT NBR SBL SBT Lane Contiguralmns I ?" + r } Traffir, V431. v" 29 1,08 918 25 22 911 Future Vol, vWh 29 168 918 25 22 911 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 5 0 0 0 6 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Fraa Free Frea RT Cbannei Led Yield Yield - None Storage Length 0 a 585 695 Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 - 0 - - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Fkaw 32 117 998 27 24 990 t41�j€mi ot_. Minar'l Majror1 Major2 Conflicting Flog All 2036 9H 0ccs. Stage 1 993 Stage 2 1038 - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 6.22 412 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3 318 221B Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 62 296 693 Stage 1 357 - - - Stage 2 341 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 60 2 - 693 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 60 - Stage 1 357 - Stage 2 329 - - - Approach WB N9 SB H'IPA Contra Delay. s 44 h a 02 HCM LOS F MNr Laneg-Aajar Mvnit NRT TJRR61'5WWF3Ln2 213L SRT Capacity (vetalh) - 60 296 693 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.525 0-397 0.435 HCM t;dnlrol Delay {s} - 118.2 24.9 101.4 - f4CM Lane LDS F C B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 2.1 1.8 0.1 - 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 19 Report R8" 14 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2929 PM W project 1: Palanl Ind & Queen Kaahumanu Hvvy 0311312020 Movement SPL EBT FSR WBL WBT WRR NK NBT NOR SBL SB i SBR Lane COnfiqurabOns tt 114 )1 tt iff tt r tt Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 28; 1003 556 248 697 54 251 313 283 58 3461 118 Future Volume (vehPh) 287 1003 556 248 697 54 251 313 283 58 346 119 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D U 0 0 0 0 U Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.40 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1.Do 1.00 1.001 1.00 1:00 1.00 1.00 1.tiD 1.00 1,07 1 op Work Zone On Approach No No N0 NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1856 IBM, 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1870 1670 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 293 1023 0 253 711 D 256 319 0 59 353 0 Peak Hour Factor 03.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.9$ 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap,vehlh 381 1526 337 1466 340 741 80 547 ArT[VB On Green 0.11 4.43 0.00 4.10 0.42 0.00 0.10 0.21 01.00 0.04 0.15 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3428 3526 1 5 3456 3497 1585 3428 3 4 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 293 1023 0 253 ?11 D 2.56 319 0 59 353 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 9777 1685 03 Serve(g_s), s 6.9 19.3 0.0 5.9 12.3 0.0 6.0 6.5 0.0 2.7 7.8 0.0 Cycle Q clea(c,-c), s 6.9 19.3 11).0 5.9 12.3 0.0 6.0 6,5 0.0 2.7 7.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00) 100 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 381 1526 337 1466 340 741 80 547 VPC Ratin(X) 077 0.67 0.75 0.48 075 0.43 01.74 0.64 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 515 15276 436 1466 433 1777 191 1709 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 t.00 1.010 1.00 t.00 1.0D 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1,00 0.010 100 1.00 0.0}0} 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 01.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 35.9 18.8 0.0 96.;5 176 0:4 35.5 286 00 392 33.0 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 4.9 2.4 0.0 5.2 1.1 0.0 5.6 0.4 0.01 12.5 1.3 0.01 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.07 0,01 We Back=(0%),vahAn 3.01 7.7 0.0 27 4.8 0.0 2.7 2.7 0,01 1.4 3.4 0.01 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),sJveh 40.8 21.2 001 41.8 18,a 01.0 42.0 29.0 0.0 51.8 34.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 1316 A 964 A 575 A 412 A Approach Delay, sfveh 25.6 24.8 34.8 36.8 Approach 'LOS C C C D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 21.8 12.6 40.5 12.7 17.3 13.7 39.4 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.9 41.6 10.5 3.6.0 101.5 40.0 12,5 34.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 4.7 8.5 7,9 21.3 8.0 9.8 8.9 14.3 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2,2 0.2 6.2 0.2 2.5 0.3 4.7 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.4 HC'M 6th LOS C Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for jNBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 359 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 2029 PM W project 2; Henry St & Q:jeer Kaahumanu Hwy Analysis Peiod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 0311312020 Movement F-i3L EBT FSR W9 WRT WeR NDL NBT NRR SP4, SBT SM Lane ConfiquratIons tt r tf iff 4t r I IM Traffic Volume (vph) 210 777 321 85 640 367 139 351 40 408 378 210 Future Volume (vph) 210 777 321 85 640 367 139 351 40 408 378 210 16eal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900. 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 19DO 3900 1900 Total Lost time (8) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane tail. Factor 0,97 0,95 1.00 097 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,94 091 Frpb: pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.98 1-00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbike8 1.00 1.QD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.t3CM 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1,00 085 100 1,00 0.85 100 1I,00 5.85 100 0,95 Flt Protected 03.95 1.00 1,40 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd.How (prof) 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3383 1537 t6IG 3194 Fft Permitted 0-. 6 1,00 1.00 095 1,00 1,00 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 0.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 3335 35.39 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3383 1537 16,10 3194 _ Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 4.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. HOW (vph) 2M 793 328 87 653 374 142 358 41 416 3815 214 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 221 0 0 270 0 0 34 0 42 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 214 793 107 87 553 104 128 Y12 7 341 633 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Gon11 (likes. (#Ihr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (9f:) 5% 2% 2% 2% 4% 211/6 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed Pha8es 7 4 3 B 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 6 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8:5 32..2 32.2 3.9 27.5 27.5 18.1 18.1 18.1 26,8 25.8 Effective Green, g (s) 8.6 32.2 32.2 3.9 27.5 27.5 18.1 18.1 18.1 26.8 26.8 Actuated WC Ratio 0-09 0,33 0.33 0,04 0,28 0.28 0.18 0,18 0.18 0.27 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap (vpb) 289 1151 514 635 964 433 291 6118 281 435 864 Ws Ratio Prat x0.06 c0.22 0.43 0.19 0.08 c0.11 c0.21 0.20 Os HOW Perm 0.07 0.07 0.00 Wo Ratio 074 0,59 021 064 0.68 0.24 0.44 0.60 0.03 0.78 0.73 Uniform Delay, di 44.1 29.0 24.2 46.9 31.8 27.7 35.9 37.1 33.2 33.4 32.8 Progras8ion Factor 100 1,00 1.00 100 100 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 lrncremental Delay, d2 98 3,4 0.9 101 3.8 13 1 1 17 0.0 9.0 3 2 Delay (s) 53.9 32.4 25.1 57.0 35.6 29.0 37.0 38.8 33.3 42.4 36.1 Level of Sarvice D c C E D c p D c D D Approach Delay (s) 34.1 35.1 38.0 38.2 Approach LOS C D D D 1nb%UoWn Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 359 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 99.0 Surn of lost U[TI5 (U) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 75,09% ICU Level of Sarvioe D Analysis Peiod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2929 PM W project 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 0311312020 tritomeictinn Int N18y, slveh Movement 16 EOL EBR NBL NBT SIFT SBR Lane Contiguralmns j 0 0 Stage 1 {� Traffic, V{}I, v" 11 82 99 11179 1181 19 Future Vol, vWh 11 82 98 1078 1181 19 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Free RT CbarinWLed - Free None Pat Gap -1 Maneuver Yield ,Storage Length 140 0 450 Stage 1 280 700 Veh in Median Sibrage. # 4 - Stage 2 251 0 - Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 4 2 5 Mvmt Fkaw 11 85 101 1112 1218 20 mSjomlio MiNx2 Mol Maims Conflicting Flew All 2532 1218 0 0 Stage 1 1218 Stage 2 1314 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 30 0 572 Stage 1 280 0 - - Stage 2 251 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 25 - 572 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 25 - Stage 1 230 - Stage 2 251 - - - Approach E13 NB SB Hr"PA Control Delay, s 237 1 1 0 HCM LOS F M Nor Laneg-Aajar Mvnit 48L NRT 1 1-BLp. SET S8H Capacity (vetalh) 572 25 - - HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.177 0.454 - HCtvl CanlmJ Delay {s} 12.5 237 0 f4CM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tiler € lNeh) 0.6 1.4 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM Sth TWSC 2929 PM W project 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 0311312020 tritomeefion Int N18y, slweh 27 Movement W13 WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Contiguralians j Traffic, V{}I, v" 15 78 1103 4 67 1197 Future Vol, vWh 15 78 11033 4 67 1197 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Frea RT Channel Led - Stop Yield - None Stcra0e Length 0 0 0 Veh in Median Sibrage, # 0 - i1 - - {1 Grade. % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 Mvmt Fkaw 15 80 1137 4 69 1234 _ Minorl ttiA€�fM € litiot_. MIajorI Major2 Conflicting Flog A.li 2511 1139 0";7 Stage 1 11313 - Stage 2 1372 - Critioal Hdwy 6.47 6,22 4 16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.47 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.47 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.563 3.318 2.272 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 30 245 593 Stage 1 298 - - - Stage 2 230 - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 27 245- Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 27 Stage 1 298 Stage 2 2013 - - - Approach we N9 SB H'IPA Contra Delay. s f2 9 0 0.5 HCM LOS F M NorLaneg-Aajar'vlunrl NBT °N iWBLn1VWBLn2 SBL SST Capacity (vetalh) - 27 245 593 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.573 0-328 0.116 HCU Carel Delay {s} - 251 26.7 119 - f4CM Lane LDS F D B HCM 95th %tiler Qveh) 1-8 1-4 0.4 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2929 PM W project 5; Puapueanui St 0311312020 ,r - Movement WBL VVOR N8T NBR Sl3L SIRT Lane CanfiquraGons r f I Traffic Volume (vehlh) 41 118 976 57 146 1077 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 41 118 976 57 146 10T7 Initial Q (0b), vats 4 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.Ot) 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1B26 1856 1841 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 42 0 i1}06 0 151 1110 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 2 5 3 4 2 2 Cap, vehlh 57 1392 180 1665 ArrlVa On Green 0.03 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.10 0.89 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1547 1956 1560 1781 187Q Grp Valume(v), vehlh 42 0 1006 0 151 1110 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.7 0.0 34.2 0.0 9.6 18.5 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 2.7 0.0 84.2 0.0 9.6 18.5 Prop In Lane 1 00 1.00 100 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 57 1892 180 1665 VPC Ratin(X) 074 0.72 0.84 0.67 !wail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 277 1392 239 t665 HOM Platoon Darla 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.01) Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 000 1.00 000 too 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 55.5 O.D 79 it 0 51.1 1 7 Inca Delay (d2), shah 16.7 0.0 3.3 0.0 17.9 2.1 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.D We Back=(50%),vahnn 1.5 0.0 126 00 5.2 2.9 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),slveh 72.2 0.0 11 1 C 0 69.0 3.8 LoGrp LOS 6 F A Approach Vol, vehlh 42 A 1006 A 1261 Approach Delay, sfveh 72.2 11.1 11.7 Approach 'LOS E B B Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.2 91.3 107.5 8.2 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4.5 45 4.: Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 15.5 83.0 103.0 18A Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 11.5 36.2 20.5 4.7 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 11,4 15.5 0.0 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 12.5 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2929 PM W project 6: Kuakirti Street 0311&2020 tritemeethn Int N18y, sVveh 4 6 Movement EMI BSR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Contiguralmns I r + + r Tralfir, V431. v" 14 411 269 11}17 992 4G Future Vol, vWh 14 411 269 1017 992 40 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stats Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led • Free None Yield ,Stcra0e Length 160 0 636 700 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 96 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % S 2 2 3 2 5 Mvmt Fkaw 14 419 274 1038 1012 41 m9liarIM1i�i'ol`_. Mihm22 M1 Maj ort Conflicting Flew All 2598 1012 0 0 Stage 1 1012 Stage 2 1586 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.48 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.48 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.48 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 26 0 685 Stage 1 342 0 - - Stage 2 179 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 16 - 685 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 16 Stage 1 205 Stage 2 179 - - Approach EB Na SB HOW Can Era] Delay, s$567 5 29 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlajar 4lunit h98L lql3T'EKn 1 FBLn2 SET SRF Capacity (ve]a1h) 685 16 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.401 0.893 - HCM CrunFol Dislay {s} 13.7 -S5075 0 PGM Lane LDS B F A, HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 11.9 2.2 Notes Volume excaeds Gapac]ly ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2929 PM W project T l_oko Street 03113f2020 Movement ESL BBT RR W8L WBT WER NBL NBA" NRR SSL SBI• SBR Lane CanfiquraGons ) 1 140 t r I t r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 149 33 53 75 44 228 41 885 71 202 977 190 Future Volume (vehPh) 149 33 53 75 44 228 41 885 71 202 977 190 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.0Q 1,06 1 Q 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1 Do Work Zane On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1841 1870 1870 1870 1826 1826 1856 1856 1870 1858 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 155 34 0 78 46 D 43 972 D 210 1018 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.06 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.% 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.56 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap.vehlh 187 200 110 113 234 1125 307 1191 ArrrVa On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.61 0.00 0.06 0.64 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1866 1565 1767 1870 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 155 34 0 78 46 0 43 922 0 210 1018 D Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh,4n 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 M5 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 9.7 1.8 0.0 4.8 2.7 0.0 1.0 43.4 0.0 4.8 48.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 9.7 1.8 4.0 4.8 2.7 0.0 1.0 43,4 0,.0 4.8 48.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 OAC 1 40 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 187 200 110 113 234 3125 307 1191 VPC Ratin(X) 0.83 0.17 0.71 0.41 018 0.82 0.68 0.85 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 283 302 288 295 255 1126 374 1191 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1,06 0.00 1.00 1417 0.00 1,00 1..04 4.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 48.8 45.3 0.0 51.3 503 0.0 17.3 172 0.0 20.1 15 1 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 11.6 0.4 0.0 8.0 2.3 0.0 04 6.7 0.0 3.8 7.9 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0,0 0.0 00 0.0 O.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 We l3ackDf( (50%),vahnn 4.8 0.9 0.0 2.4 13 O.D C 5 19,1 0,0 34 213 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl slveh 60.4 46.7 0.0 693 52.7 0.0 17.7 23.5 0.0 23,9 24.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS a E D B C C 0 Approach Vol, vehlh 389 A 124 A 965 A 1228 A Approach Delay, sfveh 57.8 56,8 23.6 24.0 Approach 'LOS E. E 0 C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11-6 72.1 16.4 8.2 75.5 11.4 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 11.3 64.7 18.0 5.0 71.0 16.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 6.8 45.4 11.7 3.0 50.4 6.8 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.2 72 0.3 0.0 83 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.0 HCM 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2929 PM W project 8; KaCT eh2meha III Road & Queen Kaahumaru Hwy 0311312020 -- r+ -- ./ Movement BBQ EST RR Wyk. WBT WEE NOL NRR NBR SRL SBT SBS Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r T I +T. Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 339 12 57 8 12 21 71 579 12 19 574 319 FLltkire Volume (vehPh) 339 12 57 8 12 21 71 579 12 19 574 319 Initial Q (0b), vah 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 4 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,DD Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1767 1767 1811 1870 1870 1870 1856 1056 1556 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 357 13 0 a 13 22 75 609 13 20 604 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 9 9 6 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 406 15 11 18 31 96 915 20 38 1680 ArirVa On Green 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.04 0.44 0.04 0.05 0.51 0.51 0.02 0.47 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1626 59 1535 X16 513 859 1167 18101 39 1781 3647 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 370 0 0 43 0 6 75 0 622 20 604 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh,4n 1685 0 1535 1698 0 0 1767 0 1549 1781 1777 D Q Serve(g_s), s 20.2 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 1.1 10,4 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 202 0.6 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 24.0 1.1 10.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 096 1. CIO 0 19 0.51 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 721 0 60 0 0 96 0 935 38 1680 VPC Ratin(X) 0.88 0.00 0.71 000 0.00 078 0.00 4.67 0.52 0.36 Avail Cap(o..a), vehlh 578 4 452 D 0 164 0 935 95 1680 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 goo Uniform Delay (d). aNeh 346 0.D 0,0 45,8 0,0 0.0 44.8 0.0 17.7 464 15.1 00 Inca Deiay (d2), shah 11.3 0.0 0.0 14.4 0.0 0.0 12.6 0.0 3.7 t0.5 D.6 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 We 13ack=(50%),vahnn 9.4 0.0 0,0 1.2 0.0 O.D 20 0.0 10,D 0.6 3.9 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, sCveh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 45.9 0.0 0.0 60.1 0,0 0.0 57.3 0.0 21.4 57.6 16.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A E A A E A C: E B Approach Vol, vehlh 370 A 43 697 624 A Approach Delay, sfveh 45.9 60.1 25.3 18.0 Approach 'LOS D E O B Turner - Assigned Phs 7 3 4 6 7 S Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 28.4 9.7 49.8 7.9 6.6 53.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 32.9 13.9 44.7 25.5 5.1 48.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 22.2 6.0 12.4 4.4 3.1 26.0 Green Ext Time (p o), s 1.7 0.0 4.0 0.1 0.0 3.8 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 27.9 HCM 6th LOS G Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 HCM 6th TWSC 2929 PM W project 9: Kona Vista Roadway 0311312020 tritemeiciion Int N18y, slveh Movement 2 3 VY13L W13R NBT NBR 9131- 86T Lane Conliguralmns I r + r 1121 } Tra'ttiG V431, v" 12 f38 1431 74 74 1118 Future Vol, vWh 12 68 1031 74 79 1118 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Camra! Stop Slap Free Free Free Free RT CbarineNi ed 3 318 Yield 221B Yield Pot Gap -1 Maneuver None ,Storage Length 0 a - 585 695 - Veh in Median Sibrage. # 0 - 0 - - {} Grade. % 0 Platoen blocked. % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 32 92 02 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Fkaw 13 74 1121 80 86 1215 141 € rmliot WWI mawl M�'rsr2 Conflicting Flew All 2508 1121 0 0 1121 9 Stage 1 1121 - - - - Stage 2 1.357 - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 8.22 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3 318 221B Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 31 251 623 Stage 1 311 - - - Stage 2 232 - Platoen blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 27" 251 - - 623 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 27 Stage 1 311 Stage 2 200 - Approach we N9 SB H'IPA Contral Delay, Z F9 7 0 08 HCM LOS F MNr Lanelhflajar Mvnit NBT NPF. 5;.-111WBLr.2 SS', 5137 Capacity (vetalh) - 27 251 623 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.483 0.294 4.138 HCM GartFol delay {s} - 228.2 25.2 11 7 f4CM Lane LDS F D B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 1-5 1.2 0.5 5:44 prn Baseline Synchs 16 Report P8" 14 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service; NB Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 2029 AM W project 04,+282020 Artcrjal Flow Running Signal Travel DiQ Arterial Arterial Grit 88 Sheet Class Seed Time peiay Time Vis){mi) Speed_ LGA Lako Street III 30 41.2 71.0 112.2 0.32 10.4 E Puapuaenui St III 30 107_f 16.7 124.3 0.90 28.0 B Total III 148.8 87.7 236.5 1-22 18.6 C Arterial Level cf Service: SB ween Kaahurnanu Hwy Arterial Flaw Running Signal Travel Diet Arterial Arterial Cross Street Class Speed Tkne (Delay Time (s) (mid Speed LOS Puapuaatrui St III 30 841.3 5.8 100.1 0.70 28.2 B Lala Street III Total 5:00 prn Baseline 36 107.6 324 140.0 0 96 23.6 v 2019 38.2 2401 1.68 25.2 Synchs 10 Report Page 1 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service, NB Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 2029 PM W project 04W2020 Arterial Row Running Srgnal Trml NO ArMal Arterial CN84 Shot Class Seed Time Dei'q The a (Mi) d LP Lako Street 111 30 41.2 48.8 90.0 0.32 13.0 E Puapuaenui St 111 30 107.8 18.1 125.7 0.90 25.7 B Total 111 148.8 66.9 215.7 1-22 20.4 C Arterial Level cf Service: SB ween Kaahurnanu Hwy Arterial Flaw Running Signal Travel Dist ArteNl Arterial Cross street Class Speed Tkne Delay Time (s) (mi) Speed LOS Puapuaattui St III 30 841.3 6.2 100.5 5.79 28.1 B Lala Street III Total 5:00 prn Baseline 36 107.6 39.2 1.16.8 0 96 22.6 v 2019 45.4 247.3 158 24.5 Synchs 10 Report Page 1 AppendixH Analysis Reports — Future Without Project Conditions (2039) HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2039 AM WO 1; Pafani Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy li'01f2019 Movement SPL EBT SBR Wilk. WST WHIR NEIL NBT W2R SBL SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons } tt r tf r tt r tt Traffic Volume (+vehlh) 87 558 266 199 827 28 297 234 133 24 392 216 Future Volume (vehih) 87 558 266 199 827 29 297 234 133 24 392 216 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.06 1.00 100 1.0D 1,00 1.00 1.00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1737 1767 1737 1841 1811 1841 1841 1870 1856 1870 f870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, aehJh 89 599 D 203 844 D 303 239 D 24 400 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.09 0.98 0.96 0.98 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 167 1420 285 1565 394 9170 45 579 ArrlVa On Green 0.05 0.42 0.00 0.08 0.45 0.00 0.12 0.25 0.00 0.03 0.18 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1`}60 3401 3554 1572 1781 3554 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 89 569 D 203 844 to 303 239 0 24 400 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh,4n 1605 1678 1472 1709 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 9.9 0.0 4.9 14.9 0.0 7.3 4.5 0.0 1.1 8.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 2.3 9.9 0.0 4.9 14.9 0.0 7.3 4.5 0,0 1.1 8.91 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 1,OD 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 167 1420 285 1565 394 900 45 579 VPC Ratin(X) 0.53 0.40 4.71 0.54 077 0.27 0.53 0.69 Avail Cap(c..a), vehPh 237 1420 421 1665 579 1933 117 1620 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 388 16.8 0.0 37.5 16.5 0.0 36,0 25.1 0.0 404 33.2 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 2.6 0.8 0.0 3.3 1_3 0.0 3.7 0.2 0.0 9.2 1.5 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 Q.D 00 0.0 0.0 0.4 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We t3ack=(50%),vahnn 0.9 3.7 0.0 2t 5,7 0.0 32 1.9 0,0 0.6 3.9 O.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(d),slveh 41.4 17,7 0.0 44.8 17.9 0.0 39.7 25.3 0.0 49.6 34.6 0,0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 658 A 1047 A 542 A 424 A Approach Delay, sfveh 20.9 22.3 33.3 35.5 Approach 'LOS C C C D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.5 25.8 11.5 40.0 14.2 18.2 8.9 42.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 45 4.5 4.5 45 4,5 45 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 5.5 47 1 10,4 34.0 14.3 38.3 5.2 38.2 Max C Clear Time (g_C+l1), s 3.1 6.5 6.9 11.9 9.3 10.9 4.3 16.9 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 1.7 0.2 3.8 0,5 23 0.0 5.9 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 25.3 HCM 6th LOS G Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 37.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.6 ;burn of lost tint ls) 18.0 2009 ANI WO 2; Henry St & Q:jeer Kaahumanu Hwy 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 1110112019 -11 --► ',- t 4� Movement EBL EBT FSR WK W8T WWBR PfQL NBT NRR SB4, SB_1 S59 Lane CanfiquraGons tt r ff r 4t r 1 4_� Traffic Volume (vph) 131 438 151 53 732 570 178 411 51 442 414 151 Future Volume (vph) 13' 438 151 63 732 57D 178 411 51 442 414 151 l6aal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 19M 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 19M 19DO 1900 19W Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ut 1. Factor 0.97 0,95 1.00 0,97 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,91 0.91 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.99 1-00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.QD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.W 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fd 100 1,00 Q,85 100 1,00 0.85 1.00 1l,00 0.85 100 097 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 0.99 Satd. How (prof) 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1545 1554 3348 1487 1595 3174 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,0D 0.95 1.00 1.01) 095 0.99 Satd. Flaw (perm) 3099 3.282 1515 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1487 1595 3174 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Q.S7 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. HOW (vph) 135 452 156 65 755 58B 184 421 53 455 427 156 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 109 0 0 4D5 0 0 42 0 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 135 452 47 65 755 180 166 442 11 347 670 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 2 2 4 3 3 4 Gonfl Bikes. (#Ihr) 1 Heavy Vehicles 13% 13% 5 6% 6% 3% 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Priateclsd phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.6 30.4 30.4 4.1 27.9 27.9 20.5 20.5 20.5 27.6 27.6 EffecDve Green, g (s) 6.6 30.4 30.4 4.1 27.9 27.9 20.5 20.5 20.5 21.6 27.6 Actuated gfC Ratio 0-017 0.30 0.30 0,04 0.28 0.28 0,20 0,20 0.20 0.27 0.27 Clearance Tinge (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap (vpb) 203 991 458 134 944 429 318 682 303 437 870 Ws Ratio Prat c4.04 0.14 0.02 c0.22 0.11 c67.13 c0_22 0.21 Os Putin Perm 0.03 11.12 0.01 Wo Ratio 0.67 0.45 0.10 0,49 0.80 0,42 0.52 0.655 0,04 0.79 077 Uniform Delay, di 45.9 28.4 25.3 47.2 33.8 29.7 35.7 36.7 32.1 33.9 33.6 Progras8ion Factor 1.00 1,170 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 1.00 1.00 1,00 1..00 1 00 lrlcremental Delay, d2 8.0 1.5 05 28 7,1 10 15 2.1 0.0 9,6 4.3 Delay (s) 53.9 29.9 25.7 50.0 40.8 32.7 37.2 38.9 32.2 43.4 37.8 Level of Sarvice D C C ❑ D C ❑ D c f] D Approach Delay (s) 33.4 37.9 379 39.7 Approach LDS C D D D llnb% otion Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 37.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.6 ;burn of lost tint ls) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 73.8% 1CU Level of Sarvioe D Analysis Peiod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2039 AMI WO 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 1V0112019 tritomection Int C7a18y, sVveh 41 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Contiguralmns I ir" + + r Tralfir, V{tl, v" 54 59 240 12912 947 37 Future Vol, vWh 54 59 200 1202 947 37 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Cantrat Stop Stmt Free Free Free Free RT CbannWl Led - Free None Yield Storage Length 140 0 650 700 Veh in Median Sicrage. # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 Mvmt Fkaw 58 63 215 1292 1018 40 M erWincr Minar2 Ma�rN1 MA o-2 Conflicting Flaw All 2741 - 1019 0 0 Stage 1 1019 Stage 2 'r2-2 - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 6.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver -22 0 681 Stage 1 348 0 - - Stage 2 158 0 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 15 - 680 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 15 - Stage 1 238 - Stage 2 158 - - - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Contra Delay. S 1894 9 18 0 HCM LOS F Minor LaneJl`-Aajar Mvnit NEL NBT EBLn 1 FBLn2 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 680 15 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.316 3.871 HCtul CrunFol Delay {s} 127 S18049 :] PGM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 1.4 8.1 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2039 AMI WO 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 1 V0 112019 tritomechon Int N18y, slveh 92 Movement W13 WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Contiguralmns j ?" 1 Traffic, V{}I, v" 11 171 122.8 18 89 913 Future Vol, vWh 11 171 1228 18 89 913 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 6 b 4 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Free RT CharinWLed . Stop 'yield - None Storage Length 0 a 0 - Veh in Median Sierage. # 0 - 0 - - {1 Grade. % 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 5 � Mvmt Fkaw 12 184 1320 19 96 982 m4ormiiot WWI Majora M jgr2 Conflicting Flow All 2504 1330 0 0 1320 0 Stage 1 133 - Stage 2 1174 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 0.22 - 4.16 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.518 3,318 2 254 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 32 189 541 Stage 1 247 - - - Stage 2 294 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 26 189 - - 511 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 26 - - Stage 1 247 Stage 2 239 - - Approach we N9 SB H'IPA Contra Delay. s 1 1f 7 0 1 2 HCM LOS F MNor Laneg-Aaj;drMvnit NRT flRRVSI-n1WFjLn2 28L SET Capacity (vetalh) 26 189 511 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.455 0-973 0.187 HCU Carel Delay {s} - 229.1 1N.5 13.7 f4CM Lane LDS F F B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 1-4 8 0.7 5:00 prn Baseline Synchs 16 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2039 AM WO 5; PUapueanui St 1110112019 Movement Whir WIBR N8T NBR Sal. aT Lane CanfiquraGons r f i" 1 t Traffic Volume (vehlh) 105 226 1041 29 52 875 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 106 226 1041 29 52 875 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1.00 1.40 100 1.00 1,DD Work Zane On Approach No No 90 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1826 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 113 D 1107 0 55 932 Peak Hour Factor 07.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 3 2 2 5 Cap, vehlh 143 1382 71 1515 ArT[Va On Green 0.08 4.00 0.75 0.00 0.04 0.83 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1585 1856 1585 1781 1876 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 113 0 1107 0 55 932 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1585 1856 1585 1781 1826 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.2 0.0 37.7 0.07 3.1 17.8 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 6.2 0.0 37.7 00 3.1 17.8 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 t 00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 143 1382 71 1515 VPC Ratin(X) 079 0.80 0.78 0.62 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 321 1382 116 1515 HOM Platoon maria 1_00 1.00 1.06 1.00 t.00 1.007 Upstream Filter(1) 1.001 0.0]0 1,00 Ono 1.00 1.010 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 45.2 0. D 8.1 0.0 476 3.0 Inca Delay (d2), shah 9.3 0.0 5.0 00 16.5 1.9 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 GO 0.0 0.0 0.0 We l3ack=(60%),vah1ln 3.1 0.0 13.5 00 1.7 43 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),slveh 54-5 0.0 13.0 0.0 641 4.8 LnC,rp LOS D B F A Approach Vol, vehlh 113 A 1107 A 987 Approach Delay, sfveh 54.5 13.0 8.1 Approach 'LOS a B A Turner - Assigned 'Plan 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.5 79.0 87.5 12.5 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 6.5 72.0 83.0 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_C+11), s 5.1 39,7 19.8 8.2 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 12,5 101 0,2 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.0 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2039 AM WO 6: Kuakini Street 1110112019 tritomeiciinn Int N18y, sVveh 113 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Contiguralmns I r + + r Tralfir, V{}I, v" 9 2� 631 977 894 74 Future Vol, vWh 9 206 631 977 894 74 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stats Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led • Free None Yield Storage Length 160 0 630 700 Veh in Median Sicrage, # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 G 2 5 5 Mvmt Fkaw 10 222 678 1 051 961 80 m9liarl�Alii�i'ol`Mihm22 M1 ^Maj ort Conflicting Flew All 3368 961 0 0 Stage 1 961 Stage 2 2407 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver � 9 0 716 Stage 1 371 0 - - Stage 2 71 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 0 - 716 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 0 Stage 1 20 Stage 2 71 - - - - Approach EB N 8 8B Hr"PA Control Delay, s 18 '1 0 HCM LOS Minor LaneJl`-Aajar Mvnit NEL NBT Ep!n 1 UO2 SP SRR Capacity (vetalh) 716 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.948 HCtul CrunFol Delay {s} 46 f; PGM Lane LDS E r~ HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 13-5 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2039 AM WO T Lako Street 11/0112019 Movement HIL EBT SBR Wyk, WBT WHIR N8L NST NBI Stir SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons r ''k + r I + r Traffic Vnlurne (vehJh) 305 59 84 84 44 325 40 W 67 172 789 153 FLltkire Volume (vehJh) 306 59 84 84 44 326 40 966 67 472 789 153 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 11.00 1.OD 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.0(1 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 9870 1641 1811 1656 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 326 63 0 89 47 D 43 1028 0 183 839 0 Peak Hour Factor 07.94 0.94 0.94 07.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0." 0.94 4.94 0.94 0.04 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap, vehJh 323 339 128 135 2228 935 184 983 ArrrVa On Green 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.07 0.47 0.00 0.03 0.50 0.40 0.06 0.53 0.00 Sat Flow, vehJh 1781 19701 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 156D 1725 1856 1585 Grp Volume(v), vehJh 326 63 0 89 47 0 43 1028 0 183 839 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1550 1725 1856 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 18.0 2.8 0.0 4.9 2.4 01.0 1.1 49.6 0.0 6.3 38.5 0.0 Cycle Q clea(g_c), s 1:x.0 2.8 O.0 4.9 2.4 O.D 1 1 49.6 G.0 63 38.5 O.D Prop In Lane 100 0.00 100 fl DD 1 00 1.00 1,00 100 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehJh 323 389 128 135 228 935 184 983 VPC Ratin(X) 1.01 0.19 07.70 0.35 019 1.10 099 0.85 !wail Cap(cw.a), vehJh 323 339 321 3.39 255 935 184 983 HOM Platoon Rana 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.40 1..04 1,010 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slush 406 34,4 0.0 44.9 43,8 0.0 17.8 248 0.0 28.1 20 0 00 Inca Delay (d2), shah 52.2 0.3 0.0 6.7 1.5 0.0 0.4 64.3 0.0 64.8 9_4 0.4 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0,0 GO 00 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.07 0.0 We t3ack=(50%),vahlln 425 1.3 0.0 2.4 1.2 0,0 05 36.0 0,0 78 18.0 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(dl sJveh 927 34.6 O.D 51.6 453 0.0 18.2 85.1 0.0 93,07 29.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS F C D D B F F C Approach Vol, vehJh 389 A 136 A 1071 A 1422 A Approach Delay, slveh 83.3 49.4 82,4 40.8 Approach 'LOS F D F D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 54.1 22.5 8.0 57.0 11.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 6.4 49.6 16.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 8.3 51.5 20.0 3,1 40.5 6.9 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 O,i} 45 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 64.6 HC'M 6th LOS E Butes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjon Summary 2039 AM WO 8; Kamehameha fill Road & Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy � �101J2419 - 2 4 r ,- 7 8 t 1� 9.7 4 -V Movement 1=81L EBT RR W9 WaT WER NaL NBT NPR 5131- SBT S89 Lane CanfiquraGons 2 4 r 6 7 8 1� 9.7 36.2 tl` 6.0 Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 192 5 32 20 15 18 93 580 1B 17 509 34B FLIkire Volume (vehlh) 192 6 32 20 15 18 93 580 18 17 509 348 lnitial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.04 1,00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1,OD 1,00 1.04 1.4D 1,00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1722 1781 1781 1781 1752 1811 1611 1870 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 205 6 0 22 16 19 104 624 19 18 547 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 4.93 0.93 0.93 4.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 12 8 8 8 10 6 6 2 6 6 Cap, vehlh 271 B 310 22 26 126 897 27 38 1580 ArrlVa On Green 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.51 0.51 0.02 0.46 0.00 Sat Flow,yahih 1733 50 1459 626 455 540 1658 1747 53 1781 432 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 212 0 0 57 0 0 100 0 543 18 947 0 Grp Sort F1ow(s),vehlun 1784 0 1459 1621 0 D 1668 4 18W 1781 1721 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.9 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 18.7 0.7 7.1 0.0 Cycle Q clear(c,-c), s 7.9 0.0 4.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 187 0.7 7A 0,0 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.00 039 0.33 1.00 0.03 1.00 4.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 279 0 78 0 0 126 0 925 38 1584 VIC Ratin(X) 076 0.04 0.75 000 0.00 079 0.00 0.70 0.48 0.35 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 669 4 598 0 0 220 0 925 131 1580 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.01) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 4.40 0.00 100 0,()o &W 1.40 0.00 1,bD 1.00 1.00 goo Uniform Delay (d). slveh 279 O.D 0.0 82.4 0,0 0 D 314 00 12.7 33.4 120 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 4.2 0.0 0.0 12.3 0.0 4.D 10.6 0.0 4.3 9.1 0.6 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0,0 0.0 00 0.0 O.D D.0 0.0 0.0 D.D 00 0.0 We 13ack=(50%),vahnn 3.5 0.0 0,D 12 0.0 O.D 19 00 6,9 0.4 23 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 32.1 0.0 0.0 447 00 0.0 42.0 0.0 17.0 426 126 O D LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Approach Vol, vehlh 212 A 57 743 565 A Approach Delay, sfveh 32.1 44.7 20.4 13.6 Approach 'LOS C D C B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 _3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.3 9.7 36.2 7.8 6.0 40.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 25.9 9.1 31.5 25,5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+l1), s 9.9 6.1 9.1 4,4 2.7 20.7 Green Ext Time (p c), s 1,0 1}.1 3.3 01 0.0 3.5 Intersection Summary FILM 0th Ctrl Delay 20.4 HCM 6th LOS C Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2009 PM WO 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 10128019 Lane CanfiquraGons 1 tt r -- tf r t tt r 8.4 tt Movement 1=81- EBT RR 4VINL WST WHIR NaL NBT W2R SBL S67 S89 Lane CanfiquraGons 1 tt r 4 tf r 7 tt r 8.4 tt r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 317 1074 614 272 743 5D 277 345 301 62 382 131 Future Volume (vehPh) 317 1070 614 272 743 5D 277 345 301 62 382 131 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 €l D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1856 1856 1870 1870 1841 1870 1856 1670 1670 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 323 1092 0 278 758 D 283 352 D 63 390 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 01.98 0.91E 0.98 0.98 0.9E 0.98 0.96 0.0E Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 406 1472 358 1409 362 798 81 585 ArrlVa On Green 0.12 0.42 0.00 0.10 0.40 0.00 0.11 0.22 0.00 0.05 0.16 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3428 3526 1 5 3456 3437 1585 3428 3554 1585 1781 3554 M5 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 323 1092 0 278 758 0 283 352 D 63 390 D Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 9777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.9 22.5 0.0 6.8 14.2 0.0 6.9 7.4 0.0 3.0 8.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 7.9 22.5 0.0 6.8 14.2 0.0 6.9 7.4 0.0 3.0 8.91 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 1,00 100 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 405 1472 358 1409 362 798 81 585 VPC Ratin(X) 0.80 0.74 0.78 0.54 078 0.44 0.78 0.67 Avail Cap(o..a), vehPh 497 1472 421 1409 418 1716 184 1r;+49 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.174 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1A0 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 370 21.2 0.0 37.7 19.6 0,0 37.6 28.8 0.0 40.7 338 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 7.2 3.4 0.0 7.6 1.5 0.0 8.2 0.4 0.0 14.5 1.3 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 GO 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(0%),vahnn 3.6 93 0.0 3.2 5.7 0,D 33 3 1 0,0 1.6 3.9 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl sJveh 44.2 24.6 0.0 453 21.1 0.0 45,8 29.2 0.0 55.2 35.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D C D C E D Approach Vol, vehlh 1415 A 1036 A 635 A 453 A Approach Delay, sfveh 29.1 27.6 36.6 37.9 Approach 'LOS C C D D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.4 23.9 13.4 40.5 13.6 18-7 14.7 39.2 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 45 45 45 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s B_9 41.6 10.5 36.0 10-5 40.0 12.5 34.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 5.0 9.4 8.8 24.5 8.9 10.9 9.9 16.2 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2,5 0.2 57 0.2 2,7 03 4.8 Intersection Summary FILM 0th Ctrl Delay 31. HC'M 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for jNBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2009 PM WO 2; Henry St & Queen ICaahumanu Hwy 1012862019 Lane tail. Factor 0,97 0,95 1.W 0,97 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1,00 0,91 091 Wvement EBL E13T M WK W8T WGR N131- NBT NER SBL SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons 1) tf r 1.00 ff r 1.00 4t r I +iT Traffic Volume (vph) 232 809 355 88 669 383 154 388 41 425 417 232 Future Volume (vph) 232 8D9 355 88 669 383 154 358 41 425 417 232 l6aalFlow (vphpl) 1900 1940 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 19DO 1900 1904 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane tail. Factor 0,97 0,95 1.W 0,97 0.95 1,00 0.91 0.91 1,00 0,91 091 Frpb: pedibikes 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.98 1-00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.QD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.t3CM 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.09 Fri 1.00 1,00 Q,85 100 1,00 0,85 1.00 1I,00 9.85 100 095 Flt Protected 0-95 1.00 1,40 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.95 1.010 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. How (prof) 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1.610 3193 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,00 0.95 i.00 1.00 095 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3335 35.39 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1610 3193 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.58 Adj. Flow (vph) 237 825 362 90 683 391 157 396 42 434 425 237 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 24B 0 0 280 0 0 34 0 45 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 237 826 114 90 683 105 141 412 8 369 683 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Con#I Bikes. (#Ihr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (95) 5% 2°% 2% 2% 4% 2"% 3% 2% 3°% 2% 2% 2°% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 B 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 8.6 32.0 32..0 3.9 27.3 27.3 19.5 19.5 19.5 28.3 2B.3 Effective Green, g (s) 8_6 32.0 32.0 3.9 27.3 27.3 19.5 19.5 19.5 25.3 2B.3 Actuated WC Ratio 0.08 0,31 0,31 0,04 0,27 0.27 0.19 0,19 0.19 0.2B 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Exterision (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap(vpb) 282 1113 498 131 931 419 305 648 294 448 888 Ws Ratio Prat x0.07 c0.23 0.03 0.20 0.49 cO.12 c0-23 0.21 Os HOW Perm 007 11.07 9.01 Wo Ratio 084 074 0 23 069 0,73 0.25 0.46 0.64 0,03 0.82 077 Uniform Delay, di 45.9 31.2 25.7 48.3 33.9 29.2 36.5 37.8 33.4 34.4 33.7 Pragras8ion Factor 100 1.00 1 00 100 1.00 1.00 1:.00 1.00 1,00 1..00 1.00 lricremental Delay, d2 196 4.5 1 1 139 5,1 1,4 1 t 2.0 0,0 117 4.1 Delay (s) 65.5 35.6 26.8 62.2 39.0 30.6 37.6 39,9 33.4 46.4 37.8 Level of Sarvice E D E D C p D C d D Approach Delay (s) 384 38.0 38,9 40,6 Approach LOS D D D D 1nb%UoWn Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 38.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,78 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 101.7 Surn of lost iilrie (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 78.7% 1CU Level of Sarvioe D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2039 PM WO 3: Hualalai Fid (North)_10128019 totomectinn Int N18y, sVveh 2 t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT S13T SBR 1 Lane Contiguralmns 1764– Stage 1 1264 Tralfir, V{}I, vetti(h 12 85 102 1126 1226 21 Future Vol, vehlh 12 85 102 1126 1226 21 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Fraa Free Frea RT CbannWl Led - Free - None 26 Yield Storage Length 140 0 450 266 0 700 Veh in Median Sbrage, # 0 - 236 1} 0 - Grade. % 0 0 0 Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 Mvmt Fkaw 12 88 105 1161 1264 22 1Aor—Winer Minar2 Majed Major? Conflicting Flow All 2635 1764– Stage 1 1264 Stage 2 1371 - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 26 0 550 Stage 1 266 0 - - Stage 2 236 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 21 - 556 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 21 Stage 1 215 Stage 2 236 Approach EB N93 SB HIIPA Contral Delay. 8S 318 3 1 1 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlaj;dr 41unr1 'SBL NBT' Bl.n 1 FBI -n2 SET SBF Capacity (vetalh) 550 21 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.191 0.589 - HCV CanlmJ Delay {s} 13.1 -S316.3 0 PGM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 0.7 1.7 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ' ; Delay exceeds 300s *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM Sth TWSC 2039 PM WO 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 10128019 tritomeefion Int N18y, slveh Movement 3.7 VwBL WBR NBT Nl3R 81131L SBT t Lane Contiguralmns j 0 Stage 1 1185 Traffic, V{}I, v" 17 87 1147 5 74 1238 Future Vol, vWh 17 87 1147 5 74 1238 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 4 4 0 0 0 4 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free FreC- Frea RT CbarinWLed . Stop Stage 1 2.84 Yield - None Storage Length 0 0 0 Platoon blocked. % Veh in Median Sibrage. # 0 - 0 - - {t Grade. % 0 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 23 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 Mvmt Fkaw 18 90 1182 5 76 1276 ISI -orf Ulna Mimi ma *1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2613 1185 0 0 1182 0 Stage 1 1185 Stage 2 1428 - - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.47 6,22 - 4.18 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.47 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.47 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 3.318 2 272 Pot Gap- t Maneuver 26 234 570 Stage 1 2.84 - - - Stage 2 216 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 23 230 1570 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 23 - - Stage 1 284 Stage 2 1857 Approach WB N9 SB H'IPA Coil GraI Delay, s 819 a 07 HCM LOS F Nor Lanelhflajdr' unit NBT N13RVyBLnIW8J-n2 SBL SET Capacity (ve#rlh) - 23 230 570 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.762 4.39 0.134 HCM CarilmJ Way {s} - -$3457 34.3 12.3 - HCM Lane LDS - F a B HCM 95th %tiler € INA) 2.2 1.7 0.5 - 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2039 PM WO 5; Puapueanui St 10P28019 Movement WK VVOR N8T NBR Sl3L 87 Lane CanfiquraGons r t I Traffic Volume (vehlh) 41 131 1007 59 161 1105 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 41 131 1x07 59 161 1105 Initial Q (0b), vats 4 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.04 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 100 1,00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1870 1826 1856 1841 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 42 0 1038 0 166 1139 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.37 0.97 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 2 5 3 4 2 2 Cap, vehJh 63 1320 200 1628 ArrlVa On Green 0.04 0.00 0.71 4.00 0.11 0.87 Sat Flow,yahJh 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 42 0 103$ 0 166 1139 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.2 0.0 35.0 0.0 8.7 19.2 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 2.2 0.0 35.0 0.0 8.7 19.2 Prop In Lane 1 00 1.00 100 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 63 1320 200 1628 VPC Ratin(X) 067 0.79 0.83 0.7D Avail Cap(cw.a), vehPh 336 1320 252 1628 HOM Platoon natio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.0D Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1,00 Ono 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 45.5 0.D 9.0 0.0 415 2.D Inca Delay (d2), sJvsh 11.7 0.0 4.8 00 16.9 2.5 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D We Back=(0%),vah1ln 1.2 0.0 13.0 00 47 2.9 Ursig. Movement Delay, sJveh LnGrp Dulay(d),slveh 57.1 0.0 13.8 0.0 684 4.5 LoGrp LOS E B E A Approach Vol, vehJh 42 A 1038 A 1305 Approach Delay, sfveh 57.1 13.8 11.4 Approach 'LOS E B B Turner - Assigned 'Plan 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.2 72.3 87.5 7.9 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 13.5 65.0 83.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 10.7 37.0 21.2 4,2 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.1 10,5 16..1 0.0 Intersection Summary _ FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 13.3 HCM 6th LOS B Notes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2039 PM WO 6: Kuakini Street 10128019 tritemeiciion Int N18y, sVveh 8 6 Movement EMI BSR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Contiguralmns I r + + r Tralfir, V431. v" 16 464 297 1942 1082 44 Future Vol, vWh 16 454 297 1042 1082 44 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led • Free None Yield Storage Length 160 0 630 700 Veh in Median Storage. # 0 - - It 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 96 98 98 98 9a Heavy Vehicles, % S 2 2 3 2 6 Mvmt Fkaw 16 463 303 1063 1104 45 ttiA Sjdmlitiot_. _ Minor.? M 1 ^Major2 Conflicting Flog Ali 277;3 1104 0 0 Stage 1 1104 Stage 2 1669 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.48 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.48 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.48 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 20 0 632 Stage 1 309 0 - - Stage 2 163 0 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -10 - 632 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -10 - Stage 1 161 Stage 2 163 - - - Approach EB Na SB HCt'A Con tral Delay. s 1041 35 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlajar Mvnil 1`0L lQT .Bl„n 1 FBLn2 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 632 1” HCM Lane VAC Ratio 4.48 W HCM CrunFol delay {s} 15.6 S 1:: 1 5 PGM Lane LDS G F A HCM 95th %tile Gi;veh) 2.6 2.9 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjan Summary 2039 PM WO T Lako Street 101282019 Movement EK EBT EBR WlBL WBT WEE NGL NSA" NRR SBL SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons 1� T+ t r t Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 155 37 59 76 48 235 45 920 78 221 1070 207 Future Volume (vehPh) 155 37 59 76 48 295 45 920 T8 221 1070 207 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.0f# 1.110 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1841 1870 1870 1870 1826 1826 1856 1856 18701 1855 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 161 39 0 79 50 D 47 958 D 230 1115 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.% 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 202 215 118 121 147 979 256 1087 ArrrVa On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.04 0.53 O.DD 0.09 0.58 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 IM 1565 1767 1670 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 161 39 D 79 50 0 47 958 D 230 1115 D Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1753 1870 0 1781 1825 0 1167 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.1 1.7 0.0 3.9 2.4 0.0 1.1 45.5 0.0 6.8 52.5 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 8.1 1.7 0.0 3.9 2.4 0.0 1.1 45.5 0.0 6.8 52.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 0,00 1 00 D OD 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh1h 202 215 118 121 147 979 256 1067 VPC Ratin(X) 0.80 0.18 067 0.41 0.32 0.98 0.90 1.03 Avail Cap(o..a), vehlh 349 373 355 364 177 979 256 1087 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 000 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 39.0 36.1 0.0 41.2 405 00 21.3 K8 0.0 26:7 18.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), shah 7.1 0.4 0.0 6.4 2.3 0.0 1.2 23.9 0.0 31.2 34.0 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We BackDf( (50%),vahnn 38 0.8 0.0 19 1.1 D'D 05 24.3 U,O 47 30.1 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),sJveh 461 36.5 0.0 477 42.8 0.9 22.6 448 0.0 57.0 529 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D C 0 E F Approach Vol, vehlh 200 A 129 A 1005 A 1345 A Approach Delay, sfveh 44.2 45.6 43.7 53.6 Approach 'LOS D D D D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.8 52.2 14.9 8.0 51.0 10.5 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s B.3 47.7 16.0 5.0 51.0 16.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 8.8 47.5 10.1 3.1 54.5 5.9 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 0,1 0.4 0.0 O.D 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 48.8 HC'M 6th LOS D Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersectjon Summary 2089 PM WO 8; Kamehameha fill Road & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 1012812019 Movement rM EST RR WK WRT WEE NOL NBA" NBR SK SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r T I 4T Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 354 13 63 9 13 22 78 604 13 21 624 347 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 354 13 53 9 13 22 78 604 13 21 624 347 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D O 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1767 1767 1611 1870 1870 1670 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 373 14 O 9 14 23 82 536 14 22 657 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 9 9 6 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehJh 423 16 13 21 34 105 817 18 43 1479 ArT[Va On Green 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.04 0.44 0.04 0.06 0.45 0.45 0.02 0.42 0.00 Sat Flow,yahJh 1624 51 1535 333 518 8M 1757 1809 4a 1781 3647 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 387 O O 46 0 6 82 0 550 22 557 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1685 0 1535 1701 0 0 1767 0 1848 1781 1777 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 17.7 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 23.9 1.0 10.7 0.0 Cycle Q clea(cg-r), s 17.7 0.4 0.0 2.1 0.0 O.D 3.7 0,0 23.9 1.0 10.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.96 1,00 4.20 0.5D 1 00 0.02 1,00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 439 0 68 0 0 105 0 835 43 1479 VPC Ratin6X) 0.88 0.00 0.68 0.00 0.00 078 0.00 0.78 0.51 0.44 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 542 4 539 0 0 156 0 835 113 1479 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.001 1.00 1.40 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0..00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 28.6 0.0 0.0 38.1 0,0 0.0 37,3 0.0 187 38.8 158 O.D Inca Delay (d2), s}vsh 13.4 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 0.0 13.7 0_0 7.1 9.1 1.0 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 0.0 t),O 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O,0 We 13ack=(50%),vahnn 8.5 0.0 0.0 1 1 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 10.4 05 0 0,0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(dl sheh 41.9 0.0 00 49.3 0,0 0-0 51 0 0.0 25.7 47.9 17.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A D A A D 5 C: D B Approach Vol, vehJh 387 A 46 732 679 A Approach Delay, sfveh 41.9 49.:3 28.6 8.8 Approach 'LOS D D C B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.5 9.3 38.0 7.7 GA 40.8 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,5 4.5 45 45 45 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 25.9 7.1 33.5 25.5 5.1 35.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 191 5.7 12.7 4.1 3.0 25.9 Green Ext Time (p o), s 1,2 0.D 4.0 0,2 03 0 2.8 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 28.3 HCM 6th LOS G Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, 913R] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 Appendix I Analysis Reports — Future With Project Conditions (2039) HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2939 AM W project 1: Palanl Rd & Queen Kaahumanu HWy 0311312020 Movement SPL EBT PSR Wilk. WRT WVR WaL r 13T MBR S2L SST SBR Lane CanfiquraGons tt + r M tt r tt Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 87 565 266 200 865 37 297 234 135 24 392 216 FLltkire Volume (vehPh) 87 565 266 200 865 37 297 234 135 24 392 216 Initial Q (0b), vah 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj I.OU 1.00 1.40 100 1,00 1,0D 1.00 100 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1737 1767 1737 1841 1811 1841 1841 1870 1656 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, veh[h 89 577 0 204 883 D 303 239 D 24 000 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.96 0.98 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 1167 1419 286 1565 394 900 45 579 ArrlVa On Green 0.05 0.42 0.00 0.08 0.45 0.00 0.12 0.25 4.00 0.03 0.18 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3209 3.357 1472 3401 3441 1560 3401 3554 1572 1781 3554 1585 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 89 577 0 204 883 0 303 239 0 24 400 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1605 1678 1472 1700 1721 15617 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1685 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 10.1 0:0 4.9 15.8 0.0 7.3 4.5 0.0 1.1 8.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 2.3 10.1 0.0 4.9 15.8 0.0 7.3 4.5 0.0 1.1 8.91 0.0 Prop In Lane 1 00 1.00 1 co 1,OD 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 167 1419 286 1565 394 900 45 579 VPC Ratin(X) 0.53 0.41 0.71 0.56 077 0.27 0.53 0.69 Avail Cap(c..a), vehPh 237 1419 421 1565 579 1933 117 1620 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1..00 1.00 0.00 1.00 I.04 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slush 388 16.9 0.0 37.5 16,8 0.0 36,0 25.1 0.0 404 33.2 00 Incr Delay (d2), s}vsh 2.6 0.9 0.0 3.3 1.5 0.0 3.7 0.2 0.0 9.2 1.5 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We Back=(50%),vahlln 0.9 3,8 0.0 21 6.0 0.D 32 1.9 0,0 0.6 3.9 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, slveh LnGrp Dulay(dl slveh 41.4 17.8 O.D 40.8 18.3 0.0 39.7 25.3 0.0 49.6 34.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 666 A 1087 A 542 A 424 A Approach Delay, sfveh 20.9 22.5 33.3 35.5 Approach 'LOS C C C D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.5 25.8 11.6 40.0 14.2 18.2 8.9 42.7 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 45 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 45 4.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 47 1 10,4 34.0 14.3 38.3 5.2 38.2 Max 0 Clear Time (g_C+11), s 3.1 6.5 6.9 12.1 9.3 10.9 4.3 17.8 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 1.7 0.2 3.8 0,5 23 0.0 6.1 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 26.3 HCM 6th LOS G Butes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 38.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 2039 AM W project 2; Henry St & Q:jeer Kaahumanu Hwy Analysis Pernod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 0311312020 Movement F-i3L EBT HR W9 W8T WGR NDL NBT NRR S1 I, SB T S50 Lane ConfiquraGons tt r f+ r 4t r 1 4_� Traffic Volume (vph) 13' 447 151 67 784} 6013 178 411 52 451 414 151 Future Volume (vph) 13' 447 151 67 780 608 178 411 52 451 414 151 ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 1900 1900 19DO 1900 19W Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 45 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ut 1. Factor 0.97 0,95 1.Oa 097 0.95 1,00 0.91 4.91 1.00 0,94 091 Frpb: pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 U.99 1.010 1.00 0-99 1.00 1,00 0.99 1-00 1.00 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 10) 1.00 4.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri 100 1,00 085 100 1,00 0.85 1.00 i,00 0.85 100 097 FIt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.010 0.95 4.99 Satd. How (prof) 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1545 1554 3348 1487 1595 3 17 4 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,0D 0.95 1.00 1.01) 095 0.99 Satd. Flaw (perm) 3099 3.282 1515 3303 3446 1548 1564 3348 1487 1595 3174 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0-97 4.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Q.S7 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. HOW (vph) 135 461 156 69 804 627 184 421 54 465 427 156 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 109 0 0 4D5 0 0 43 0 21 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 135 461 47 69 804 215 166 442 11 349 678 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 2 2 4 3 3 4 Gonfl (likes. (#Ihr) 1 Heavy Vehicles (9faj 13°x6 13% 5 6% 6% 3% 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Priateclsd phases 7 4 3 B 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.6 30,3 30.3 4.1 27.8 273 20.5 20.5 20.5 27.7 27.7 EffecDve Green, g (s) 6.6 30.3 37.3 4.1 27.8 27.8 20.5 20.5 20.5 27.7 27.7 Actuated WC Ratio 0.07 0.30 0.30 0,04 0,28 028 0.20 0,20 0.20 17.28 0.28 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap(vpb) 203 988 456 134 941 427 318 682 303 439 873 Ws Ratio Prat x0.04 0.14 0.02 c0.24 0.11 c4.13 x,0.22 0.21 Os Hatio Perm 003 41.14 0.01 Wo Rabb 0.67 0.47 0.10 0.51 0.85 0.51 0.52 0,65 0,04 0.79 0,78 Uniform Delay, di 45.9 28.6 25.3 47.3 34.5 30.7 35.7 36.7 32.1 33.8 33.6 Progras8ion Factor 100 1.00 1 00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0[1 1.00 1..00 1.01D lrlcremental Delay, d2 8 0 1.6 0.5 33 9.8 4.3 15 2.1 0.0 9,6 4.4 Delay (s) 53.9 30.2 25.8 50.6 44.3 35.0 37.2 38.9 32.2 43.4 38.0 Level of Sarvice ❑ C C D D D ❑ D c ❑ D Approach Delay (s) 33.5 40.7 379 39.8 Approach LDS C D D D llnb% otion Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 38.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 104.6 Surn of lost U[TI5 (s) 18.0 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 740% ICU Level of Sarvioe D Analysis Pernod (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2939 AM W project 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 0311W2020 tritemeefion Int N18y, srveh 56.6 Movement EMI BSR NBL SBT SBR Lane Contiguralmns j 1040 0 0 Stage 1 Tralfir, V431. v" 54 60 215 1292 965 37 Future Vol, vWh 64 60 215 1292 966 37 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT CbannWl Led • Free - None Yield ,Storage Length 140 0 650 700 Veh in Median Storage. # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 0 Stage 2 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 Mvmt Fkaw 58 65 231 1389 1039 40 m9liarl�Alii�i'0 _. Miw2 M 11 Mat°r2 Conflicting Flew All 2891 1040 0 0 Stage 1 1040 - Stage 2 1851 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2 218 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver i 18 0 669 Stage 1 341 0 - - Stage 2 136 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - 12 - 668 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 12 - Stage 1 223 Stage 2 136 Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Control Delay. 6 2351 65 19 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lunen -Hajar Mvnit NEI_ lqt3T'EKn 1 FB02 SET SRF Capacity (vetalh) 668 12 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.346 4.839 - HCM ariFol Delay {s} 13.2 S2351.6 0 PGM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 1.5 8.4 Notes Volume exceeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2939 AM W project 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 0311342020 tritemeiciion Int C7e18y, sVveh Movement 13 1 WEI 1N13R NE3T Nl8R 813L NS13T Lane Configurations I 1433 ') Stage 1 1443 - Tr r, V431, v" 11 171 1333 18 89 933 Future Vol, vWh 11 171 1333 13 89 933 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Camra! Stop Slap Free Free Free Frea RT CbannWN Led . Stop 2.264 'yield - None Storage Length 0 0 Stage 1 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 }-Meavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 6 5 Mvmt Fkaw 12 184 1433 19 96 1003 m4or4Mlriol`Minors maicirl ^Ma1tr2 Conflicting Flow All 2638 1443 0 0 1433 0 Stage 1 1443 - - - Stage 2 1195 - - - - Crltioal Hdwy (5.42 6.22 - 4.16 Critical I•idwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follvw-up Hdwy 3.518 3318 2.264 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 26 -162 462 Stage 1 217 - - - Stage 2 287 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 21 -162 - - 462 - Mrry Cap -2 Maneuver 21 Stage 1 217 - Stage 2 227 - - - Approach we 1rN9 SB H'IPA Control Delay. s 17fi 9 13 HCM LOS F Minor Lanegvlaj dr Mvnit NBT °N8"Bb1VWBLin2 SBL S5T Capacity (vetalh) 21 162 462 HCM Lane VAC Ratio O.563 1 135 0207 HCM Crunlrol Delay {s} - -S308.6 188-4 14.8 PGM Lane LDS F F B HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 1-6 9-8 0.8 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platiDon 5:00 prn Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page 6 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2939 AM W project 5; Puapueanui St 0311312020 Movement Mo ment AIM *8R N8T NBR Sl3L W Lane CanfiquraGons r t i" I t Traffic Volume (vehlh) 108 226 1149 32 52 895 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 105 226 1146 32 52 899 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 D Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No Plo Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1856 1870 1570 1829 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 115 0 1219 D 55 953 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 3 2 2 5 Cap, vehJh 142 1428 71 1546 ArrlVa On Green 0.08 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.04 0.85 Sat Flow, vahJh 1781 1585 16% 1585 1781 1826 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 115 0 1219 0 55 953 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1781 1585 1856 1585 1781 1826 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.7 0.0 53.9 0.0 3.7 20.4 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 7.7 0.0 53.6 0.0 3.7 20.4 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 100 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 142 1428 71 1546 VPC Ratin(X) 081 0.85 0.78 0.62 !wail Cap(c..a), vehlh 264 9428 81 1546 HOM Platoon natio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D Upstream Filter(1) 1.00 0.00 1,00 Ono 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). aNeh 55.1 O.D 9.4 0.0 57.9 3.0 Inca Delay (d2), shah 10.5 0.0 6.7 0.0 33.5 1.9 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(50%),vah1ln 3.9 0.0 20.1 00 2.3 5.4 Ursig. Movement Delay, slveh LnGrp Dulay(dl sJveh 65.6 0.0 16.1 0.0 91,4 4.9 LnGrp LOS E B F A ---- Approach Vol, vehJh 115 A 1219 A 1008 Approach Delay, sfveh 65.6 16.1 9.6 Approach 'LOS E B A Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.3 88.2 107.5 14.2 Change Period (Y -Re), s 45 4.5 4.5 4,5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 5.5 93.0 103.0 18.0 Max C Ciear Time (g_C+11), s 5.7 55.6 22.4 9..7 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 16.4 10.8 0.2 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 151 HC'M 6th LOS B !dotes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page a HCM 6th TWSC 2939 AM W project 6: Kuakirti Street 03113x2020 tritomeefion Int N18Y, 8lv6h Movement 12 7 EBL EBR NBL SBT SBR Lane Contiguralmns I r 990 + + r Tralfir, V{}I, v" 9 206 634 1W2 921 76 Future Vol, vWh 9 20fi 634 1002 921 76 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stats Free Free Free Free RT CbannWi Led • Free 360 None - Yield ,Stcra0e Length 160 0 630 Platoon blocked. % 700 Veh in Median Sicrage. # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade. % 0 0 - 0 0 Stage 1 Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 G 2 5 5 SB Mvmt Fkaw 10 222 682 1077 994 82 t j€ fMlitiot^ 1tiAir x2 M1 ^Maj ort Conflicting Flew All 3431 990 0 0 Stage 1 990 Stage 2 2441 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 - 4.12 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap- t Maneuver � 8 0 698 Stage 1 360 0 - - Stage 2 68 0 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 698 - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 0 Stage 1 -8 Stage 2 68 - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Coil Ira I DalaY, s 205 Ci HCM LOS Minor Lanegvlajar Mvnrt NEL NBT E131..n 1 UO2 SP SRF Capacity (vetalh) 608 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0�;?7 HCtul CanllmJ Delay {s} 5i S � PGM Lane LDS F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 15 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2939 AM W project 7 ; l_oko Street 0311342020 Movement EBIL EBT RR WlBL WBT WEE NIL NBT NBR SBS SBT SM Lane CanfiquraGons ) I t r t r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 311 59 84 100 47 334 40 981 67 1,75 808 157 Future Volume (vehPh) 311 59 84 100 47 334 40 981 67 176 808 157 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 4 D 0 0 D 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.Q0 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 100 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zone On Approach No No No NO Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 9870 1641 1811 1856 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehJh 331 63 0 106 50 D 43 1044 0 187 860 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0." 0.94 0.94 4.94 0.94 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap, vehlh 314 335 140 148 232 990 168 103.9 ArrlVa On Green 0.18 4.18 0.00 0.48 0.08 0.00 0.03 0.53 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 156D 1725 18% 1%5 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 331 63 0 106 5D 0 43 1044 0 187 860 D Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1781 1870 D 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1•'585 Q Serve(g_s), s 21.5 3.4 0.0 7.1 3.0 0.0 1.3 63.5 0.0 7.5 45.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 21.5 3.4 0.0 7.1 3.0 0.0 1.3 63.5 0,.6 7.5 456 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 0.00 100 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 319 335 140 148 232 990 166 1039 VPC Ratin(X) 1.04 0.19 4.76 0.34 ON 1.05 1 11 0.83 Avail Cap(o..a), vehlh 319 335 287 344 250 990 168 1039 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.40 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.04 1.00 0.04 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0. DO Uniform Delay (d). slveh 49.2 41.8 0.0 54.1 62.3 0 D 191 282 0.0 37.8 217 0.0 Inca Delay (d2), shah 60.3 0.3 0.0 8.1 1.3 0.0 0.4 44.2 0.0 103.4 7.6 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.D D.0 0.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 O,0 We Back=(50%),vahnn 149 1,6 01 34 1.5 o.D 05 39 1 0,0 99 21 1 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(dl sJveh 109-6 42.1 01.0 623 53.6 0.0 20 1 72.4 0.0 1413 29.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS F LD E D C F F C Approach Vol, vehlh 394 A 158 A 1087 A 1047 A Approach Delay, sfveh 98.8 59.5 70.4 49.2 Approach 'LOS F E E D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12-0 68.0 26.0 8.3 71.7 14.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 45 4.5 45 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 7.5 63.5 21.5 5.0 68,0 19.6 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 9.5 65.5 23.5 3.3 47.6 9.1 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 6.4 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 65.7 HC'M 6th LOS L Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for iNBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t t HCM 6th Signalized lntersection Summary 2939 AM W project 8; Kamehameha lil Road Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 0311312020 ---I' -- r+-- 1P.t Movement rM EST RR UV9L WBT WEE NaL NBT NSR SBL SBT SBR Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r + T tt Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 195 5 32 20 15 18 93 591 18 18 529 362 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 196 6 32 20 15 18 93 591 18 i8 529 362 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D U 0 0 0 a 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,0[3 1.00 100 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1870 1870 1722 1781 1781 1781 1752 1811 1611 1870 1811 1811 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 211 6 0 22 16 19 100 635 19 19 569 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 2 2 12 8 8 8 10 6 6 2 6 6 Cap, vehlh 260 7 28 21 24 125 1035 31 37 1850 ArT[Va On Green 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.08 0.59 0.59 0.02 0.54 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1734 49 1459 623 453 535 1668 1748 52 1781 3532 D Grp Valume(v), vehlh 217 0 0 57 0 0 100 a 654 19 569 0 Grp Sat Flowu(s),vehlun 1784 0 1459 1615 0 0 1668 0 1800 1781 1721 0 Q Serve(g_s), s 11.0 0.0 0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 21.8 1.0 8.6 0.0 Cycle Q clea(c,-c), s 11.4 0.0 4.0 33 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 21.8 1.0 8.6 O.0 Prop In Lane 097 100 039 0.33 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 267 0 73 D 0 125 0 1486 37 1850 VPC Ratin(X) 0.81 0.00 0.78 000 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.61 0.51 0.31 Avail Cap(cw.a), vehlh 493 0 439 0 0 222 0 1066 97 1860 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 t.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.174 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 O.00 4.00 100 0.00 0.011 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 386 O.D 0.0 443 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 12.2 46.4 120 0.0 Inca Deiay (d2), shah 5.9 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.0 14.9 0.0 2.6 10.5 D_4 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We l3ack=(50%),vahnn 5.2 0.0 O,D 16 0.0 O.D 26 0,0 8,0 0.5 3.0 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 44.4 0.0 4.0 60.4 0,0 0.01 53,6 0.0 14.9 5 ,9 12.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A E A A D A B E B Approach Vol, vehlh 217 A 57 754 588 A Approach Delay, sfveh 41.4 60.4 20.0 13.8 Approach 'LOS CY E 0 B Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.5 11.5 54.9 8.7 6.5 617.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 45 45 4.5 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 25.9 125 48.1 25.5 5.1 55.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 13.0 7.5 10.6 5.3 3.0 23.8 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.9 13.1 3.8 0.2 0.0 4.4 Intersection Summary FILM 5th Ctrl Delay 22.5 HCM 6th LOS G Motes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 HCM Sth TWSC 2939 AM W project 9: Kona Vista Roadway 0311312020 tatemectinn Int N18y, slveh Movement 4 1 WWI 1h113R NEST N13R 8131- 513T Lane Configurations I i" t r 0 Stage 1 Tfaffir, V431, v" 29 108 1011 25 22 19134 Future Vol, vWh 29 198 1011 25 22 1004 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 6 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Cbannel Led - Yield - Yield - None ,Storage Length 0 0 - 585 695 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver Veh in Median Sibrage. # 0 - 0 - - Stage 1 Grade. % 0 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Fkaw 32 117 1095 27 24 1001 M -Or1M inor 1x11 in ar 1 IM ajar i Major -2 Conflicting Flow All 2238 1999 0V 1099 0 Stage 1 1099 Stage 2 1139 - - - - Crltioal Hdwy 6.42 8.22 - 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3 318 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 47 258 635 Stage 1 319 - - - Stage 2 305 Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 !Maneuver 45 258 - - 635 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 46 Stage 1 319 . Stage 2 293 - - - Approach we NB 8B H'IPA Control Delay. s 64 fl 9.2 HCM LOS F tNor Laneg-AajarMvnit NBT°NBR1 5;' nPhF3Lr2 SB„ SES- _ Capacity (ve#rlh) - 45 258 635 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.7 0.455 0.038 HCM t;dnFol Delay {s} - 190.1 39.1 11.9 f4CM Lane LDS F a B HCM 95th %tiler € NA) 2.7 2-2 0.1 5:00 prn Baseline Synchs 10 Report PeqA 14 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2939 PM W project 1: Palanl Rd & Queen Kaahumanu HWy 0311312020 Lane CanfiquraGons , ++ r *- tf r t tt r ' ./ Movement EK EBT SBR W9 WST WEIR NaL ITT WBR SBL S61 S89 Lane CanfiquraGons 1 ++ r 4 tf r 7 tt r I tt r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 317 1104 614 274 767 59 277 345 311 64 382 131 Future Volume (vehPh) 317 1104 614 274 767 55 277 345 311 64 382 131 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 4 0 0 D U 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.40 1.DD 1.00 1.40 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vehfhlln 1856 1856 1670 1870 1841 1870 1856 1670 1670 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 323 1127 0 280 783 D 283 352 D 65 390 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.06 0.96 0.98 0.38 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 Cap.vehlh 406 1471 359 1409 362 792 84 585 ArrlVa On Green 0.12 4.41 0.00 0.10 0.40 0.00 0.11 0.22 0.00 0.05 0.16 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 3428 3526 1585 3456 3497 1585 3428 31 04 1585 1781 3554 M5 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 323 1127 0 280 783 D 283 352 D 65 390 0 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/un 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.9 23.6 0.0 6.8 14.9 0.0 6.9 7.4 0.0 3.1 8.9 0.0 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 7.9 23.6 0.0 6.8 14.9 9.0 6.9 7.4 0.0 31 8.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 406 1471 359 1409 362 792 84 585 VPC Ratio(X) 080 0.77 0.78 0.566 078 0.44 0.77 0.67 Avail Cap(o..a), vehPh 497 1471 421 1409 417 1714 184 1648 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.O0 1.00 t.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 100 1.00 0.00 1.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 1..00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 37 0 21.5 0.0 37.7 F9 8 0.0 37.6 289 0.0 40.7 338 0.0 Inca Delay (d2), shah 7.2 3.9 0.0 7.8 1.6 0.0 8.2 0.4 0.0 14.0 1.3 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 We BackDf4D(60%),vahnn 36 9.8 0.0 32 6.0 O.D 33 3 1 0,0 1.7 3.9 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),sJveh 44.3 25.4 00 45.5 21,4 0.0 45.8 28.3 0.0 54.7 35.1 0,D LnGrp LOS D C D C D C D D Approach Vol, vehlh 145+0 A 1063 A 635 A 455 A Approach Delay, sfveh 29.6 27.7 35.7 37.9 Approach 'LOS C C D [D Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.5 23.7 13.5 40.5 13.6 18-7 14.7 39.3 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 45 45 45 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s B_9 41.6 10.5 36.0 10-5 40.0 12,5 34.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_C+11), s 5.1 9.4 8.8 25.6 8.9 10.9 9.9 16.9 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.0 2,5 0.2 5.5 0.2 2.7 0.3 4.9 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 31.3 HC'M 6th LOS Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for jNBR, EBR, WBR, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 40.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service ❑ HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 2039 PI'S W project 2; Henry St & Q:jeer Kaahumanu Hwy Analysis Period (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 0311312020 Movement EBL EBT SSR Wyk, W8T WGR NDL NBT NBR SBL SB T SBR Lane ConfiquratIons tt M ff r 4t r 4-� Traffic Volume (vph) 232 864 355 93 71}4 403 154 388 43 449 497 232 Future Volume (vph) 232 854 355 93 704 403 154 388 43 449 417 232 l6aal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 190D 1900 19170 19M 19DO 1900 1904 Total Lost time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane tail. Factor 4,97 0,95 1.00 0,97 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0,94 091 Frpb: pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 0-99 1.00 1,00 D.98 1-00 0.99 Flpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.QD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.t3CM 4.00 1.013 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fd 1.00 1,00 085 100 1,00 0.85 1.00 1I,00 0.85 100 095 Flt Protected 0-95 1.00 1,40 0.95 1.04 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. How (prof) 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 tM 3194 Fft Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 095 1,00 1,00 0.95 9.00 1.00 095 0.99 Satd. Flow (perm) 3335 35.39 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 16,10 3194 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.99 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. HOW (vph) 237 871 362 95 718 411 157 396 44 458 425 237 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 2a5 0 0 305 0 0 36 0 42 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 237 871 107 95 718 106 141 412 8 37 6 703 0 Condi. Peds (#Ihr) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Con#I (likes. (#Ihr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles (9f:) 5% 2% 2% 2% 4% 211/6 3% 2% 3% 2% 2°,+ta 2% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA PriatecLed phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.6 29.6 29.8 5.0 26.2 26.2 15.5 19.5 19.5 25.9 28.9 EffecDve Green, g (s) 8_6 29.8 29.8 5.0 26.2 261.2 19.5 19.5 19.5 28.9 2B.9 Actuated WC Ratio 0-08 0,29 0.29 0.05 0,26 0.25 0.19 0,19 0,19 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extensian (8) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Gap(vpb) 283 1042 466 169 898 404 307 661 296 459 912 Ws Ratio Prat x0.07 c0.25 0.03 4.21 0.49 c0.12 c0.23 0.22 Os HOW Perm 0.07 0.07 0.01 Wo Ratio 0.84 0,84 0.23 0.56 0.80 0.26 046 0,63 0.03 0.82 077 Uniform Delay, di 45.6 33.4 27.0 47.0 35.0 25.8 36.2 37.6 33.2 33.7 33.1 Pragres8ion Factor 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1 00 1.130 1,00 1.00 1.00 lrncremental Delay, d2 18.9 7.9 11 42 7,4 16 1 1 2.0 0.0 10.9 4.1 Delay (s) 64.6 41.4 28.1 51.3 42.4 31.4 37.3 39.6 33.2 44.6 37.2 Level of Sarvice E D C ❑ D C ❑ ❑ C f0 ❑ Approach Delay (s) 41.8 39.4 386 39.7 Approach LOS D D D D 1nb%UoWn ,9umma HCM 2000 Control Delay 40.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service ❑ HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0,80 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 101.2 Surn of lost U[TI5 Interseotion Capacity Utilization 79 i°%o 1GU Level of Sarvioe D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Ci itical Lane Group 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 6th TWSC 2939 PM W project 3: Hualalai Fid (North) 0311W2020 tritemection Int N18y, sVveh Movement 2 5 EOL EBR NBL NBT S13T SBR Lane Contiguralmns 0 Stage 1 1337 Trafrir, V{}I, v" 12 98 107 1185 1297 21 Future Vol, vWh 12 90 107 1185 12.97 21 Conflicting Pods. #Jhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantral Stop Slap Free Free Free Frea RT CbannWi Led - Free .1 None - Yield ,Storage Length 140 0 450 - 700 Veh in Median Sibrage. # 0 - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 17 - - Grade. % 0 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 17 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 4 2 5 Mvmt Fkaw 12 93 110 1222 1337 22 moor M lio Miriiir2 Magi Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2779 1337 0 0 Stage 1 1337 Stage 2 1442 - - - - - Crltioal Hdwy (5.42 - 4.12 - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 Pat Gap -1 Maneuver 21 0 516 Stage 1 245 0 - - Stage 2 218 0 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 17 - 616 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 17 - Stage 1 193 Stage 2 218 - - Approach EB N93 SB HIIPA Control Delay. s$ 425 9 1 1 a HCM LOS F Mlnor Lanegvlajar Mvnr1 NBL N6TEW1 EBLin2 5BT SER Capacity (vetalh) 016 17 - - HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.214 0.728 HCM CanlmJ Delay {s} 13.9 -S4259 0 PGM Lane LDS B F A HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 0.8 1.9 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ; Delay exceeds 300s *; C -amputation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2939 PM W project 4; Hualalali Rd (South) 0311312020 tritemeefion Int N18y, slweh Movement 4 6 W131 W13R NBT Nl8R 8131L SBT Lane Contiguralmns I r T). Stage 1 1252 } Traffic, V{}I, vetti(h 17 37 1212 5 74 1314 Future Vol, vehlh 17 87 1212 5 74 1314 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 9 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free FreC- Frea RT CbarinWiLed . Stop 2.272 Yield . None Storage Length 0 0 Stage 1 0 - Veh in Median Sbrage, # 0 - 0 - - - Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 Mvmt Fkaw 18 90 1249 5 76 1355 m9liarIM1140 WWI M * 1 MA r Conflicting Flow All 2759 1252 0 0 1249 0 Stage 1 1252 - - Stage 2 1507 - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.47 6,22 418 Critical I-idwy Stg 1 5.47 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.47 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 3.318 2.272 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 21 210 537 Stage 1 263 - - - Stage 2 197 - - - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 18 210, - - 537 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 18 Stage 1 263 Stage 2 1519 - - - Approach we NB 8B H'IPA Control Delay. s 1�6 0 GI HCM LOS F MNr Laneg-Aajar Mvnit NBT °N iWBU1VWBLin2 SBL SST Capacity (vetalh) - 18 210 537 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.974 0.427 0.142 HCM CarilmJ Delay {s} - -S4952 34.3 12.$ f4CM Lane LDS F a B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 2.5 2 0.5 - 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 19 Report Page 6 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2939 PM W project 5; Puapueanui St 0311312020 t WVement Whir WtBR N8T NBR SBL GST Lane CanfiquraGons r t r I + Traffic Volume (vehlh) 44 131 1072 53 161 1181 FLIkire Volume (vehPh) 44 131 1072 63 161 1181 Initial Q (0b), vats 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No Plo Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1870 1826 1856 1841 1879 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 45 4 1105 0 166 1218 Peak Hour Factor 0-97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0,97 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 2 5 3 4 2 2 Cap, vehlh 58 1412 191 1686 ArrlVa On Green 0.03 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.11 0.90 Sat Flow,yahPh 1781 1547 185$ 1560 1781 1870 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 45 0 1105 0 166 1218 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1781 1547 1856 1560 1781 1870 Q Serve(g_s), s 3.4 0.0 48.0 0.0 12.5 25.2 Cycle Q Clea(c,-c), s 3.4 0.0 48.0 0.0 12.5 25.2 Prop In Lane 100 1.00 100 1,0€1 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 58 1412 191 1686 VPC Ratin(X) 077 0.78 0.87 0.72 !wait Cap(cw,a), vehPh 235 1412 241 166 HOM Platoon maria 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.017 Upstream Filter(I) 100 0.00 1,00 Ono 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d). slveh 655 0.0 9.6 0.0 60.0 1.9 Inca Delay (d2), shah 18.8 0.0 4.4 00 22.9 2.7 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(0%),vah1ln 19 0.0 18.6 00 6 9 43 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Crelay(d),slveh 943 0.0 14 0 C 0 82.9 4.6 LoGrp LOS = 6 F A ---- Approach Vol, vehlh 45 A 1105 A 1384 Approach Delay, sfveh 84.:3 1 4.0 14.0 Approach 'LOS F B B Turner - Assigned 'Plan 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 19-1 108.4 127.5 9.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4.5 45 4,5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 1B_5 100.0 123.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 14.5 50.0 27.2 5.4 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.2 14.3 20.6 0.1 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 15.3 HCM 6th LOS B !dotes Unsrgnalized Delay for [NBR, WBR[ is excluded from caiculatiors al the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 8 HCM 6th TWSC 2939 PM W project 6: Kuakirti Street 0311312020 tritemeethn Int N18y, sVveh S3 Movement EMI BSR NBL NBT SST SBR Lane Contiguralmns I r + + r Tralfir, V{}I, v" 16 464 298 1116 1094 44 Future Vol, vWh 16 454 298 1116 1094 44 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stats Free Free Free Free RT CbannWl Led • Free None Yield ,Storage Length 160 0 630 700 Veh in Median Sicrage. # 0 - - 0 - Grade. % 0 - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 98 96 98 98 98 98 Heavy Vehicles, % S 2 2 3 2 6 Mvmt Fkaw 16 463 304 1139 1115 46 m9liarlM160 Mihm2 M1 Maj ort Conflicting Flew All 2863 1116 0 0 Stage 1 1116 - Stage 2 1747 - Crltioal Hdwy 6.48 4 12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.48 Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.41 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 2 218 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 18 0 625 Stage 1 305 0 - - Stage 2 149 0 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -9 - 626 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver -9 Stage 1 157 Stage 2 149 - - Approach EB N9 SB H'IPA Contra Delay. S 1188 2 3 4 0 HCM LOS F Mimic Lanegvlajar Mvnii `3131- lqt3T',B!n 1 FBI -n2 SET SRR Capacity (vetalh) 626 9 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.486 1.514 HCtvl CrunFol Delay {s} 16.1 S1188.2 0 - HCM Lane LDS C F A, HCM 95th %tile Giveh) 2.7 3 Notes Volume excaeds Gap acily ' ; Delay exceeds 30Os *; Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2939 PM W project T l_oko Street 0311312020 � � � /140 t Movement EK EBS` EBR WSL WBT Y IRR NBL NST NB %L SBS` SBR Lane COnfiquraGons 1 T t r I t r Traffic Vnlurne (vehlh) 164 37 59 83 49 250 45 972 78 223 1078 209 Future Volume (vehPh) 164 37 599 83 49 250 45 972 78 223 1078 209 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.04 1,00 1.40 100 1.00 1,09 1.00 1.00 1,0.0 1,00 1.00 1,00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1841 1870 1870 1870 1826 1826 1856 1656 1870 1855 1$70 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 171 39 0 86 31 0 47 1012 0 232 1123 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.06 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap.vehlh 196 209 114 116 184 1172 266 1240 ArrrVa On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.63 0.00 0.06 0.66 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1753 1870 0 1781 1$26 0 1767 1866 1565 1767 1870 1585 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 171 39 0 86 51 0 47 1012 D 232 1123 Q Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlun 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve(g_s), s t3.2 2.6 0.0 6.5 3.7 0.0 1.3 60.7 0.0 6.1 69.5 0.0 Cycle Q CleBr(c,-c), s 13.7 2.6 0.0 6.5 3.7 0.0 1.3 607 0.0 61 69.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1(0 0.00 1 00 OX 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 195 209 114 116 184 1172 266 12:44 VPC Ratin6X) 0.87 0.19 0.76 0.44 0.26 0.86 087 0.91 Avail Cap(o..a), vehlh 2:30 745 234 239 195 1172 352 1240 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 t.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 0.00 1.00 1..W 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). atveh 60.0 65.3 0.0 63.2 6 t 9 0.0 252 20.5 0.0 29,5 195 00 Incr Delay (d2), shah 25.9 0.4 0.0 9.8 2.6. 0.0 0.7 8.5 0.0 18.6 11.1 0.0 Initial Q Dela+y(d3),sfveh 0.0 0,0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 We Back=(0%),vahlln 7.3 1,3 0.0 33 1.8 0.0 08 27.6 0,0 6.3 31.8 00 Ursig. Movement Delay, s1veh LnGrp Dulay(d),slveh 85.9 557 0.0 73.0 64.5 0.0 25,9 28.0 0.0 46.1 30.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS F E E F C C D C Approach Vol, vehlh 210 A 137 A 1059 A 1355 A Approach Delay, slveh 80.3 89,8 28.9 33.2 Approach 'LOS l= E C C Turner - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 91.2 19.9 8.7 95.5 13.3 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 45 4,5 45 Max Green Setting (Galax), s 15.1 80.9 16.0 5.0 91.0 18.0 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 8-1 621 15,2 3.3 71.5 8.5 Green Ext Time (p c), s 0.4 8,2 0.2 0.0 10.0 0.3 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 311.0 HCM 6th LOS D Notes Unsrgaalized Delay for [NBR, EBR, Wf3R, SBR] is excluded frorn calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 pm Baseline SVnchro 10 Report Page t 1 HCM 6th Signalized lntersectien Summary 2939 PM W project 8; KaCT1ehameha lit Road & Queen Kaahumaru Hwy 0311312020 Movement rM EST RR UV9L WBT WEE NOL NBA" NOR SEIL SBT SBS Lane CanfiquraGons 4 r 1� I +T+ Traffic Volume (vehlh) 373 13 63 9 13 23 78 536 13 21 634 352 FLltkire Volume (vehPh) 373 13 53 9 13 23 78 6361 13 21 694 352 Initial Q (0b), vah 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 U 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 100 1€.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach NO No No No Adj Sat Flow, vel*lln 1757 1767 1611 1870 1870 1676 1856 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 393 14 0 9 14 24 82 6C9 14 22 667 D Peak Hour Factor 0.95 4.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.955 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.915 Percent Hesuy V8 h, 9 9 5 6 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 437 16 12 18 31 104 936 20 39 1106 ArrlVa On Green 0.27 4.27 0.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 O.06 0.52 0.52 0.02 0.46 0.00 Sat Flow,yahPh 1627 55 1535 325 505 867 1767 1811 38 1781 3647 0 Grp Valume(v), vehlh 407 D 0 47 0 D 82 0 683 22 567 D Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh,4n 1685 0 1535 1698 0 D 1767 0 1549 1781 1777 D Q Serve(g_s), s 26.8 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 32,6 1.4 13.8 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(c,-c), s 268 0.6 6.0 3.2 0.0 0.0 5.3 0.0 32.6 1.4 13.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 097 1. CIO 4 19 0.51 1.00 0.02 1.00 0,00 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehth 453 0 61 0 0 104 0 956 39 1706, VPC Ratin(X) 090 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.00 079 0.00 0.T1 0.56 0.39 Avail Cap(ow,a), vehlh 614 0 376 0 0 160 0 9.56 79 1706 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 111 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Upstream Filter(l) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.04 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.06 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d). slush 406 O.D 0.0 55.0 0.0 0.D 534 00 2'I 3 55.7 192 0.0 Incr Deiay (d2), shah 13.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 4.6 12.1 D.7 0.0 Initial Q Dela+7(d3),sfveh 00 0.0 C.D 00 0.0 0.D D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 We 13ack=(50%),vahnn 126 00 0.0 17 0.0 O.D 2.7 0.0 14.1 07 5.5 0.0 Ursig. Movement Delay, sfveh LnGrp Nlay(dl sheh 535 0.0 0.0 73.2 0,0 0.D 66.8 0.0 259 61,8 19.E 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A E A A E A �. E B Approach Vol, vehlh 407 A 47 765 W A Approach Delay, sfveh 53.5 73.2 30.2 21.4 Approach 'LOS D c C C Turner - Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 35.4 11.3 59.E 8.6 7.0 64.0 Change Period (Y -Re), s 4,� 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 41.9 10.4 54.2 25,5 5.1 59.5 Max C Clear Time (g_C+11), s 28.5 7.3 15.0 5.2 3.4 34.6 Green Ext Time (p c), s 2.1 0.0 4.6 01 0.0 4.5 Intersection Summary FILM 6th Ctrl Delay 33.1 HCM 6th LOS C Mutes Unsrgaalized Delay for [EBR, SBR] is excluded from calculations of the approach delay and intersection delay. 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report paqA 13 HCM 6th TWSC 2939 PM W project 9: Kona Vista Roadway 03113x2020 tritemeefion Int N18y, slweh Movement 7.9 WWI W]313 NEST N1313 9131- 513T Lane Contiguralmns I r + r 1230 + Traffic, V{}I, v" 12 68 1132 74 79 1225 Future Vol, vWh 12 68 1132 74 79 1225 Conflicting Pods. IUhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cantrat Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channel Led 3.318 Yield 2 716 Yield Pot Gap -1 Maneuver None ,Storage Length 0 0 - 585 695 - Veh in Median Sierage, # 0 - 0 - - Grade. % 0 Platoon blocked. % 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 32 92 02 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Fkaw 13 74 1230 88 86 1332 m9liarIM1140 WWI M 1 MA r Conflicting Flew All 2734 1230 0 0 1230 0 Stage 1 1230 Stage 2 1504 - - - Critioal Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - 412 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Sig 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2 716 Pot Gap -1 Maneuver 22 217 567 Stage 1 276 - - - Stage 2 203 - Platoon blocked. % Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 19 217 - 567 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 19 Stage 1 276 Stage 2 172 - Approach WB N9 SB Hr"PA Control Deiey. s 81.8 0 08 HCM LOS F M NorLaneg-Aajar'vlunit pjE37 tdBR61'5i. WF3Ln2 213 SRT — Capacity (vetalh) 18 217 567 HCM Lane VAC Ratio 0.686 0.341 0.151 HCM Carilml delay {s} - -S3759 79.9 12.5 HCM Lane LDS F D B HCM 95th %tiler € Neh) 1-9 1.4 0.5 5:00 prn Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 14 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service; NB Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 2039 ASI VN project 0028020 Arles al Flog Running Signal Travel Dill. Arterial Arterial Gass Shot late T D t The (m)_. S"peed LOS Lako Street 111 30 41.2 111.1 152.3 0.32 7.7 F Puapuaanui Street 111 30 11]7.6 21.2 128.8 0.90 25.0 B Total 111 MA 132.3 281.1 1-22 15.6 D Arterial Level cf Service: SB ween Kaahurnanu Hwy Arterial Flaw Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial Cross Street Class Speed Ti ne Delay Time (s� {mid Speed LOS Puapuaartui Sleet III 30 041.3 7.0 101.3 0.79 27.9 B Lake Street III Total 5:00 pm Baseline 30 107.6 41.7 1•'193 09D 21.5 v 2019 48.7 250.6 158 24.2 Synchs 10 Report Page 1 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service, NB Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 2939 PM W project g4r 2020 Adrlerial Row Running. Srgnal Trml bill Aral Arterial CN84 Sheet MS .�, Spurt Ions De1q The (a) (mi) Puapuaattui St III 30 LPS Lako Street 111 30 41.2 65.6 106.8 0.32 10.9 E Puapuaenui St 111 30 11]7.6 21.9 120.4 0.90 24.0 B Total 111 1413.8 87.4 236.2 1.22 19,6 C Arterial Level cf Service: SB ween Kaahurnanu Hwy Arterial Flaw Running Signal Travel Dist Arterial Arterial Cross Street Class Speed Tkne Delay Time ls� (mid Speed LOS Puapuaattui St III 30 941.3 7.3 101.6 0.70 27.8 B Lala Street III 30 107.6 47.5 155.1 0 9Q 20.8 C Total 5:00 prn Baseline 2019 54,8 256.7 1.38 23.5 C Synchs 10 Report Page 1 Appendix 1 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Figure 4C-4. Warrant 3, Peak dour (70% Factor) (COMMUNITY LESS THAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE 44 MPH ON MAJOR STREET) 400 MINOR STREET 300 HIGHER.- VOLUME IGHER- VOLUSN PIE APPROACH- 200 VPH 100 l l l l l l 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES — 2 CF1 MORE LANES & I LANE �-a LANE & 1 LANE 1. 75° 300 400 500 wo 700 800 1,900 1000 1100 12W 1300 MAJOS STREET—TOTAL OF 130TH APPROACHES— VEHICLES FEET HOUR (VPH) Opliorr: I.$ Ai an inrcr-,coion wirh .t high Ii;,,+ °•irrr rrtiiiv tram the major strcet, ihtir hgrijI warranI anaI,v,;Px m;iy bv Per -formed in a many+t r I 11 11 - :-1 c 1[-,, ~r r of nce piajnr-sheer Itlr-earn vol ume.g as the `miner -sl reel vrY4lme .dlld thecorivirCM41,;,,. "11% il11. .!.�-.:II IA 11-rJxF,11111 tra.ffif: on rhi M.%jrw qw-1 ;is the " major -Areal "` Will 1LO For all unsignalized intersections, minor appraach is QK left turn onto minor street For all unsignalized intersections, major approach is QK opposing thru Use 1 Lane $ 1 Lane Existing Peak Flour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant? Hualalai (N) 776 164 YES 1005 84 NO Hualalai (S) 1006 73 NO 949 61 No Kuakint 1 733 517 YES 887 243 YES 2024 Without Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant? Hualalai (N) 816 172 YES 1056 88 YES Hualalai (S) 1057 77 YES 988 64 NO Kuakini 842 543 YES 932 755 YES 2024 With Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant? Hualalai (N) 827 ISO YES 1096 91 YES Hualalai (S) 1117 77 YES 1025 64 NO KV Roadway 819 13 NO j 912 45 NO 14uakini 856 543 YES 1 944 255 YES 2029 Without Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant? Hualalai (N) 857 191 YES 1110 93 YES Hualalai (S) 1111 81 YES 1038 61 NO iCuakini 885 571 YES 980 268 YES 2029 With Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minter Warrant? Major MIF-Of warrant? Hualalai (N) 876 1.96 YES 1131 98 Y 5 Hualalai (5) 1216 81 YES 1103 67 NO Kuakini S10 579 YE5 980 271 YES 2039 Without Project Peak Hour Warrant AM PM Major Minor Warrant? Major Miner Warrant? Huaialai (N) 947 200 YES 1226 102 YES Hualalai (S) 1228 89 YES 1147 74 NO ICuakini 894 631 YES 1082 297 YES 2x39 With Preject Peak Hour Warrant AM pM Major Minor Warrant? Major Minor Warrant? Hualalai (N) 956 2.15 YES 1.297 107 YES Hualalai (5) 1333 89 YES 1.212 74 NO Uakini 894 639 YES 1082 300 YI"S Figure 4C-2. Warrant 2, Four -Hour Vehicular Volume (70' Factor) (COMMUNITY l.SSSTHAN 10,000 POPULATION OR ABOVE .10 UPI ON MAJOR STRFFT� 400 p2Z MINOR STREET HIGHER- x+70 VOL LIME APPROACH - VPH 2c),u 3w 'ot u 4 i'j 700 NUU D 10 L)1} MAJOR STREET—TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES— VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) Ojxiun: 43 Ai w iflWr,L`L'I"+k;i kkllkl ..1 I11ry:h %'%111PtW "I IL r1=1+11'11 r1'.t1il(: Irt-)m Ow n 4jor sweici.1ha si-nat W',IrTal]k JR.1I}'!+0i 11 a be ptti6mio LI in :v lll.innt r (i?,.I i:iiit i � l lle � +11 the Tllik)ikT-;kf�"r !sit-nlrT1 ��7�1Ime, 8w kh2 1�1ii74�r-sLC2ex y{1IlBIl4t :trl[I II1C: 44Fk ICwI751r[[{1411.' tPL rill 1[It rk .11, 1 tiD'CLJ .0 th "Ix1d][71'-GIretk"' voluIII C. Use 1 lane & 1 Lane Existing- Ilualalai (N) 4Alow- Warrant Major m(nor Warrant? 6:45-7:45 AM 776 164 YES 7:4.5-8:45 AM 69.2 145 YES 3:00-4:00 PM 1005 84 YES 4:00-5:00 PM 926 74 YES 5:00-5:00 PM 986 59 NO Existing - Hualalak (S) 4- 1�jw Warrant Major Minor Warrant? 6:45-7:45 AM 1046 70 YES 7-45-8-45 AM 1030 25 NO 3-00-4:00 PM 940 59 NO 4:130-5:00 PM 864 64 NCS S:00-6:00 PM 765 56 NG L)d ing KLaakini 6:45 -7.4.-1 A I4'1 1� ,r Major o 776 4 -Hour Warrant _ f�linc;r a� I'rant' �.� , _i5 Y E S 7:45 3.45 Al`a.l 3:00-1:0.) 11%11 4:00-5:00 PM 683 467 YES 881 224 872 264 YES YES 5:0(3-6:00 PM 870 217 YES APPENDIX 3: Biological Survey Results Botanical .Srrrv4y and Vertebrate Fauna Assessrrrent TAIK 3- 7-6-21: parcels 16, 17, IS & 19 (78.324 acres) North Kona District, Island of'Hawai`i By Ron Terry, Ph.D. Geometrician Associates, LLC September 20 17 Introduction This biological survey was prepared for Richard Wheelock, Member, KV3 LLC, to inventory the existing biological environment, assess the potential fbt biological impacts prom proposed development in the survey area_ and devise mitigation measures to avoid or rniuUnl7e any impacts. Tlie land in quctitiwi c-i!7e purvey area-) c omists of four parcels situated mauka of [lucen Ka`ahumanu I I w— iiorth of the Latin Street intersection, as shown in Figure 1, Twvo ofthc parcel-. ,:r, owncd h� P,N3 Ll _C and are planned for residential and associated uses. 'l liQ oil i.::- [%%o parcels are linear drainage ditches owned by the County of Ha ai'i. The objectives of the botanical stirs .,v c-ni ilonent of this survey wve.rc to 1) describe the vegetation, 2) list all species encountered. 3) determine the likelihood of the presence of rare, threatened or endangered (RTE) plant species; and 4) identify the locations of any RTE individuals found. The area was surveyed by Ron Terry in September 2017. Plant species were identified in the field and, as necessary, collected and keyed out in the laboratory. Special attention was given to the possible presence of any federally listed (USFWS 2017) threatened or endangered plant species, although the habitat slid not indicate a high potential for their presence. The work also included a faunal survey restricted to a tally of birds and introduced marnrnals, reptiles, or amphibians observed, during the Botanical fieldwork, as well as one additional ane -hour bird observation. The field survey also assessed the general valate of the habitat areas for native birds. Although there were no radar or ultrasound observations conducted that might have detected the endangered Hawaiian hoary bat, the general value of the habitat for the Hawaiian hoary hat was evaluated. Cenerally not included in the survey was assessment of invertebrates. but the area was searched for [lie principal plant species in the area known to support the larvae and pupae of the enda.ngcred l lackburrt's sphinx moth ( C1ndaeei blackhm-viii), the one listed endangered insect that is potentially present. Vegslalion: Irrfl'uences and Prier iou.3 Studies ['he ,geolotiic substrate for most oft:he srarvey area is sail -covered pahochoe lava flows from Hualala� dated between 5,000 and 10,000 years ago (Wolfe and Morris 1996). The sail here is classified as Waiaha medial silt loam, 2-10 or 10 to 20 percent slopes, depending on location, This sail forms on ash -cowered pahechoe flows and has, a 14 -25 - inch depth to bedrock. It well drained but also has a high runeff potct uAI i,+am et al 1973). The survey area varies in elevation from 330 to 690 feet abn\ c sca Icvcl, and receives an average annual rainfall of about 35-38 inches, increasing, in tl]c- »ial.tka direction (Gianlbelluca ct A 2013). The pre -human vegetation was likely Lowland Dry,'Mesic Forest (per Gagne and Cuddihy 1990). This consisted of an open canopy forest dominated by a wide variety of trees, shrubs, herbs, vines and ferns. It like] v had� a dJv£crse c ovcr of native dry -forest trees and shrubs including latna and atlahe'e (Psydrax odoralum), with a number of other species perhaps including now rare tresis such as tiwilkvili (Frythr°inascxrth0censis•), halapepe (PleomeIt, ,s'atui'wjeensiS) a11d uhluhl (AA-, rrneurorr {ff7w iense). However, the general landscape of the Kailua-Kona area has been radically altered by centuries of settlements, over a century of grazing,. and patrticula}rly by the development since 1960 of hotels, condominiunts, resort homes, commercial facilities and assiociated itlfrat trueture. Even on properties that experienced no development, intro}duced plaints. anima k and pests profoundly altered the biota. Prominent species in the stirvcy area's clevationail ;cane now include elle aliens haole koa (Leucaena lencoceJrhalcrj, npiuma� f 1 `itheL e lolrmin dulce), xid guinea grass (,Wegathyrsus ma rimes), Although the survey area never underwent modern development except on its margins, archaeological studies (SCS 2016) indicate that it was used prior to Western contact fora k aariety of activities, leaving features associated with agriculture, habitation, burial, and [ransportation. 1n more recent tirlles, the survey areal vv as paint of large former cattle ranch and agricultural area started in the early 1900s. The lower portion of the project arca Is still used to pasture cantle, and extensive icncing, cattle walls, se}-cral corrals and C,I k CIIriICS are present_ The project area and surrounding lands were bUIIdozed 0111 time between the 1940s and 1970s, Evidence of bulldozing is visible in aerial p ltlacry'ra Ells as at]ternating bands of cleared hulldozer tracks and bands of push piles, .1rcliii, i3Iogists continued that the linear bands cvidcnt in aerial imagery are bulldozer- clearcd laths and linear Files of bulldozed rock along the cleared bulldozer paths. RTE plants are well krlown from certain areas at this elevational zone in Kona, but. with few exceptions. they are generally found further io the north in slightly drier areas with more recent 1; va (Geometrician Associates 2004. 2005, 2.007, 2009x, 2009b. 2014a, 201144. Gerrish 2006,. 2007x, 2007b, 2008, 2009). RTE plants noted in the surveys above in the lKcalakehe to Palama Nui area include the endangered plants uhiilhi, ko`oko'olau. (BicJens mieranthrr ssp. c trrFrrr�{1ht'llcr), haIatpcpc. (1'1c omele hmiva iensis), �-v,Lliine no ho kola Us(xlendiwni1r b'r'ftdhtm — nt7w extinct In the 4w'lld) and 1"rmhr'is'),hs hcni-z Wensis, the rare Plants '011C makai (I'ol'. S'i ra ,�cr�rc.iwjc•c�rr.s'i.s and maiapilo (Cgpp r' s sandwichiaira) (boAh of which we ako fiOund tO t11c south on the mast recent lava in Kahalu`u); and the increasingly uncommon wiliwili. No surveys that we have conducted mattka of Kuakini Highway between Palani Road and Honalo - an area with abundant soil that has led to intensive farming, ranching and settlement - have found any RTE plants, In terms of RTE fauna, the most likely candidate would be the endangered Hawaiian hawk This wide-ranging raptor nests in large trees and forages in forests, farms and even residential neighborhoods, and is seen throughout forested areas of the island. Klavitter (2000) and Gorresen et al. (2000 summarized hawk sightings Piologiecri {lrfrrt ey, T?IM 3-'-d-2I: parcels 16, 17, 18 & 19 'age 2 around the island, finding instances in this area of Kona, but at genCi-ally low densities. According to one study: "Bath native and exotic [r'CCS arc USCd for besting, but the majority of nests are built in mature '61li'a trees. Other nest trees include larva, koa, kolea, eucalyptus, common ironwood.. Christmas berry, coconut, macadamia nut, and mango" (U DA-NRCS 2007). A number of other RTE birds arca fairly unl ikely to be folrttd .itt the surtiCy area. The Hawaiian goose or tune (Brcrwcrsundvicerrxi ? 1 in endemic. federally listed endangered species that is only occasionally observed in ul-ban Kona. although it is more abundant at Big Island Country Club in the Kekaha region of Kona. Some endangered Hawaiian petrels smuhrichensis or 'naw) and band-rumped storm -petrels (0cer.modroma erawrw, as well as thwatened Newell's shearwaters (Mif fimi.v carrric rrlirt is notrelb), may overtly the: area between the rno riths orl`3une and. October. All three cal` these pelagic seabird specios most high in the mountains in burrows. There is no ;svitabic nesting habitat for any of these seabird species within or near the survey area, The primary cause of mortality in all these scabird species in Hawaii is thought to be predation by alien manxaralian species at the iwsting colonies_ Collision with man-made structures is a anothersignificant cause. Nocturnally flying seabirds, especially fledglings on their way to sca in the summer and fall, can become disoriented by exterior lighting. When disoriented, seabirds may collide with manmade structures, If they are not killed outright, the dazed or injured birds are easy targets for feral mammals (Banko 1980; Day et at 2003). Although not an RTE species, the Hawaiian endemic sub-speciies of the short - cared owl or pueo (Asioflammeus satrdwichensis), a protected migratory bird, nests and hunts in tall grasslands and shrr.rblands and could conceivably be occasionally present on the survey area. The endangered flatwaiia.n hoary bat (Lasiatrrrs einer•ens semotax), the only native Hawaiian land. marnma 1, is found in most areas on the island of Hawaai`i and has been observed in the thorny forests of bona. Hawaiian hoary bats are vulnerable to disturbance during the summer pupping season. Finally, the one endangered insect found in many parts of Kona is they Blackburn's sphinx moth (r1 andruc-a blackharnii). It is generally associated with drier on vironments and `a`a substrates. The native horst plant aiea (Arothocosstrum spp.) is extremely rare, but a substitute host, the prolific weed tree tobacco (Nicotiana glarrca), quickly colonizes dry, disturbed lava flows. Neither host was considered likely tea be within the survey area. In general, we concluded that the probability of Crtcnuntering RTF plant nr anierial species in Ow- survey area was low, because of substrate, topography, elevation. history of grazing and evidence of prior surveys. Vegelafiow ResnIts Our survey found two vegetation types that were distinguished primarily by management regimes (see H-ure 2 for photos). The upper half of (lie survey area contains very few cattle and is intensely overgrorwn with guinea grass ( Figure 2a). The area could be described as a scattered forest or thick savanna, dominated by koa haole, opiuma. and Biolog ectl {lrfrrt e)T?IM 3 -?-6-2 I: parcels 16, 17, 18 & 19 Page 3 monkcypod These tbur plants compose most of the biomass and cover in ill is area, The lower half is moderately grazed and has a very similar but slightly 111ore diverse tree flora, with kiawe (Px-osopis panics), klu (Acocia faiwe. iana), and several other non-native trees (Figure 20. The understory contains a great diversity of n,on-native grasses, herbs, shrubs and vines, along with a very few natives, including `uhaloa (TYuh reria indica) and `ilima (.Sida allax). Although a highly intermittent streatrt traverses the property. no aquatic or true riparian vegctailon is present (Figure 2b). (flora carrclRare. Threxened or ErxkmgeredPlants All plant species found in the survey area during the survey are listed in Table 1. Of the 65 species detected, five were indigerintts (native to the iiawaiian Islands and elsewhere) and none were endemic (found only in the 1 lawaiian Isltuids), All native plants found are eery common throughout the island of Hawal °i and the Staic. and no rare. threatened or endangered plant species were present. No tree tobacco, ,,IL nli_ic lilt l«r its role as a potemial hest for an endangered moth, was fuunrl ill thy: �,LIIA 'U' -Ca. Online maps from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (US PWS) depict no critical habitat utf Or War the surl.�ey urea (litlp:/,'ecos.f s. a� vleep!reporUtablelcritic.al-habitat.htttrl accessed September 2017). t3ird v The 15 species of birds detected during tbC',Llrl-CV were all non-native and typical of those found it similar arem of lowland disturbed habitat in Kona {Table 2). Most common %vere spotted dove (Sireplopel`ia chimvrsis), northern cardinal (Cardrrwlis ccxrc,fi�rc7ii. }, cattle egret (Bubulc us This) and parakeet (ora inrgcr sp. ), Japanese white -eye (T_n rerc�p. cr}��r�rticrr,ti) and house finch No native birds were detected, and it is generally poor habitat for most native birds. The short -eared owl may utilize the survey area (:or roraging. The trees in the survey area are generally too short to serve as typical Hawaiian hawk nests, but it probably forages at least occasionally in the area. Hawaiian Hoare, Bre Hawaiian hoary hats may v eTy well utilize the survey area, as they have been observed in surrounding ani sirrillar areas- This survey took place in daylight, did not use any detection ccluipmCIII., and was not designed to detect bats. However, the Hawaiian hoary bat should be presumed to be present. Bats may forage for hying inserts over portions of the survey area on a seasonal basis. and they may find some of the larger shrubs and trees suitable nesting habitat. Biulogiecrl {Srfrrt e)� T?IM 3 -?-6-2 I: parcels 16, 17, 18 & 19 Page 4 hdrocfrrced Mammals, Repafle_F, an d ftphibians The only live inammals seen during the survey were cattle (Bos twrrus), feral pigs (,Firs scrgfa - which were abundant in the survey area), and snial I .Indian mongooses (Hetpe_yle.s: cz. It is likely that Ieral cats (,r eli,s carrrr), rttiice (,Vh1S spp.)' rats (Ralrus spp.) and domestic dogs, (C anis. f: f tnrrliarr.�) are occasionally present There are no native terrestrial reptiles or amphibians in Ilawai`i, The only reptile observed during the survey was the day gecko (Pheimma sp.). It is likely that other species of gecko as well as anoles and skinks are present. No amphibians were seen or heard. plane of these alien mammals or reptiles have conservation value and all are deleterious to native flora and fauna. Impacts c ndMirigalivrn Mea rrr es As discussed above, no threatened or endangered plant species as listed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2017) appe;lr to be present in the survey area, nor are there uniquely valuable habitats. No ex1""tir7�' or proposed federally designated critical plant (or animal) habitat is present in the survey area.. There appears to be no potential to adversely affect ITE plant species. If the pn sect incorporates additional outdoor lighting, it may amrace threatened and endangered Hawaiian seabirds, which may becorne disoriented b the lighting, resulting in binds being downed. To avoid the potential downing of these threatened and endangered seabirds due to interaction with outdoor fighting, no construction using unshleldtd equipinent maintenanr:e lighting should be pel-Witted after dark ht1ween the month-, of April and October. All additional permanent lighting shrould conliarni to the I Iawai `i County Outdoor L.igitting Ordinance (I lawai `i County Code Chapter 9. Article 14), which requires shielding of exterior lights so as to lower the ainbicn( glare caused by unshielded lagliting. The endangered Hawaiian hoary bat is vulnerable to disturbance while roosting with its juveniles in the, pLlpping season. To minimize impacts, it is recommended that woody plants taller Hiatt 15 feet should not be removed or trimmed during the bat birthing and pup rearing season (June 1 through September 15). No tree tobacco, the principal current hast for the endangered Blackburn's sphinx moth, was observed dewing our surveyti. Because of the weedy, extremely test—rowing and spreading nature of the plant alter landcicaring and the difficult process necessary to determine if pupae are present in the ground under the plant after larvae have finished their life cycle, it is reeomrnen&d that the landownerfdeveloper prevent any infestations from growing. AlthOLIgb it is advisable to consult DL.NR and or USFWS before removitrg any plants, juverdle plants less than two feet tall are not generally utilized by the larvie and may be safely removed, subject to discussions with these agencies. Piologietti {lrfraxe)� T?IM 3-'-6-2I: parcels 16, 17, 18 & 19 Page 5 Report Limilalrons No biological survey of a large area can claim to have detected every species present. Some plant species are cryptic in _juvenile or even mature stages of their life cycle. Dry conditions can render almost undetectable plants that extended rainfall may latex, invigorate and make obvious. Thick brush can obscure even large. healthy specimens. Birds utilize ditTerent patches of habitat during diff rcm (Mics of the clay and seasons, and only long-term study can determine the exact species composition. The findings of this survey must therefore be interpreted with proper csutIOTI. ire particular. there is no warranty as to the absence of any particular species. Bialqgreal {lrfrrt e)) T?IM 3-'-6-Z1: parcels 16, 17, 18 & 19 Page 6 l,der attire Cited Banl£o, W. E. 1980. Porml£rtion Histories - SIveies Aecounu S"eahh-A. Newell .� S'be ar ivaler (`A 'o). Coops°rative National Park Resources Studies Unit. University of Hawaii at Manoa, Dcparrniont of Botany, Technical Report #5A. Day, R. H,, B. Couper, and T, C. Tcifcr. -1003. "Decline of Townsend's (Newell's Shearwaters (Puffinus auricularis newelli) on Kauai, Hawaii." f he Auk 114: 6,69- 679. Gagne, ., and L. +Cuddihy. 1990. "Vegetation," pp. 45-114 in W.L. W'utixiL).R. Herbst, and S.H. Sohmer, ergs., AAamral of 1he Flowering Pl orfs rl# Haio e rr °i. 2 vols. Hariolulu: [University of Hawaii Press. Geometrician Associates, I.I.C. 2004.13r ianical,%r ivj-, 1Ceazihoie Alcrraiv Land . Kecauhon, Kona, IslandvfHcrtvai'i. Prep. for Kantcharneha Investment Corporation (K[C) and Tsukazal<i Ych & Moom. On file at K.IC. 2005. Botanical Sia-vey, Afrrkaler' Lands, North Kona, fslarrd ofHmuai `i. ['rep. for PBR Hawaii. 2007. T1.FfK 7 -?-.:Of (poi %) Proposed kakalei Fire StrrhwI S"ile Kau, North Kona, Island of Hcawai 'i. Prep. for PBR Hawaii. . 2009a. Final T�wh -ouniewfal Assessment, Kafoko Housing Program - Prep. for Hawaii County Office of Housing and Community Development. . 2009b. Boo aideed Survey crf l- acre Storage Yard, TALK 7-4-20:03 (por. ). Prep, for Mary] Development, .2014a. Flora and I rauna Slrrvey, Proposed Kealcakehe Regional Park Sire, Nor & Kona Districi, Island of Hrrw ai'i. Prep. for Hawaii County DPW. 2014b. Biological Reeon)rcrissanc:e Report, Makalei Afauka Lands, North Kona Distra'a lslwtd ofHem -ai `i. Prep. for .larnes McCully and RLH. Gerrish, G. 2006, Rare Plarrl and Boicarical Surmj, of La'i opua i•`illage 5 and Aarperker Pr•cwn,e. Prep. for l lawai'i State Department of Hawaiian Homelanck 2007a. Final Report: Rare Plant and Botanical :Sun ey° ref La'i'c}praa Village 1. Prep, for Hawai' i State Department of Hawaiian Homelands. . 2007b. Rare Plcrraf card B61c Tical .5'r(r-vey of l crTopua iVillage 4 card Park. Prep. for H.awai'i. State Department of KiN� aIIart homelands. Biulcrgieai {lrarrt e)r IA4K 3-'-6-21 parcels 16, 17, 18 & 19 Page 7 2108. I3f)i[Traacal ,Snr>, ev c?f pinyorari— Haul Road Villages [}f La'i irpua. Inclritlnag Portioia of 71111[ 7-4-21.1. ?, 3 cand20. Prep, for Ylawai'i State Department of] Iawaiian Homelands. --- • 2 W9. Rare Plant and Botanical Stwvey of the Arc:haeologiccal Preserve, Viilage.t cif La- `Wopera. Prep_ for Hawaii State Department of Hawaiian Homelands. Gianibellucat, T.W., Q. Chen, A.G. Frazier, J.P. Price, Y. -L. Chem, P. -S. Chu. J.K. Eischeid, and D.M. Delparte, 2013: Online Rainfall Atlas of Hawaii. Bull. Alner. Meteor. Soc. 94, 313-316. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-002'28.1. C arrosen.. P.M., R.J. Camp, J.L. Klavitteraind T.K. Pratt. 2009. Abundance, Distribu11011 and Population Trend of the Hawaiian Hawk: 1999-2007. Technical R;:1p >'rt 1 ICSU-0()9 I lawai'i Cooperative Studies Unit, University of Hawaii at IliloiPAC"RC:, K l ae i ac r .1 I _- 2000. Serve , .?neihocdolr r, abvrufunee, and d}emogrq?hy of `the endangered flr.aii,caiican l aw h: is delistinig wr arrmiled? MS Thesis, Seattle: University of W ashif1+7rtoil. 4" Sato, H. H., W. Ikeda, R. Paeth, R. Smythe, and M. Takehiro, Jr. 1973. Soil Survey of IslamlofHmvai'i, Stale ofHatvai'i. LT_S. Department oFAgricuIlure- Sail Conservation Service and University ofHawai'i Agrictt.lture Experiment Station. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. Scientific Consultant Services (SCS). 2016, Archaeological Sites Inspertiorr Lever Reportfirr 20llrevjaia43� RecorcledArchaeological S ies Located on 66039 Acres of Lcrr d in H5hial ou 1 s! Ahrrlrria a, Kaifu ICoiw, North Kana District, H ai 'l Montt rrf TMKT - {3) 7-6-021:016 and x117]. Prep. for Richard Wheelock, Fast -West Realty. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2017. tISFWS 77irea.tenedw?dPrrclarngerecl Sjvcies System C SS). hEip://ecos.rws.gov/tess_ptiblie/. U.S. Department ofA iculture, Natural resources C'onsen ation Service Pacific ,Islands Area (USDA.-NRCS). 2007. llmvaiian Ncru°k Habitat 1_idi ancemeini and A ltanagerr ent. Biology Technical Nate No, 17 University of Hawaii at Hila, Dept, of Geography. 1498..4da.t of"Flrni#aa``i. 3rd ed. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press. Wolfe. F.W., and J. Morris. 1996. Geologic &Iap of the AlartdgfHawai`i. U GS Misc lnvcstigations Series Map i -2524-A. Washington, D,C.: U.S. Geological Survey. Bivlcigieal {lrrrix e)� T?IM 3-7-6-21: parcels 16, 17, 18 & 19 Frage 8 ��ry/flr tl" l—— .. .. '; .M...� e.,. .:. t'.- '. .tl:t: '.,, :r9l�i, .�. A... .._ . ,. .•JtY t'. i ..... 2a. Dense guinea grassiopiuma vegetation of mauka half ■ Biolo is ai Survey, IM 3-7-6-21. Imircels 1 b, 17, 18 & 19 l'c'rge 10 4xh Ilk "L Ai �i P T Li} rP P Ilk f _ tl4M°'a .x a w M � f w R y� iiyye i r a.f, ?M' y yr. •.. J �r 7 Y 000 a"4 r x n f d' .*� '� � •. SWI f a 7• ,. *,�.., � Av., w w � , ��• � h '� ar, ate". , Ff 4 i ,,... f 1 1 r r 4e ,. i Table 1. Plant SQecies Observed in Survey Area Scientific Name Family Common Name I Lire Form Status* FERItiS: Nc.ahralc lis "wifi1lorca Ne prole idacc:ac Sword Fern l IL f A 1�17i'T11i71[F,c<'}T`!}.4' tiT"!).tiS'7i.s Pol'+•'podiaccac Maik, Scomcd Foray I ILirb A Pteri_s cretin a Pleridaceac `O.kti Fern I FLOWERING PL iNTS: Ahutilon grands .randsfbhaim malvaceat Hail- Abutiloll 1-lerh A Acacia Orne.ki arwi F.Ih lccac K Ili sill -11h A Afc,urires mal? �ccona KILI;Lii l®ree N }lm arfawhirs a'frldi.4' ! 111a11'iallllaiai 4'zl `)Il ndcr Amaranth 1101'1) A B.idvns alba At tcr;ac�:ac Beggar's Tick Herta ,A Biclen-'; craatr.liiffrlica Astcraccai: 131ue E3idens l CI -h A Riclow glory A—Acri co:w Rog =ar'w Ti L: k Hlrrb A i udelTerra um, ifivcl SSCrcl1111-lariac'L�ae Shrub A f 'ac's i linin L(L.Gw efala F�i�bact.'a xBuddlcUt wall -a -bit elle A 7l%am a�L..'crisw 131C�frrans 11 41Gbacc ae 1' [Y�F'�amidgp Na {V eat pea A C {1{111Jf7[-'si%,,e hTrtcl FL1 horbiacen Garden Spurge Herb A t'1a~aTarcrf.� 1'c{� 1aa, c°�"TCJf{?hcr 1"u rhorbiaceae Graceful Spurge herb A C h loi is b ancaica Po aceae slk t o kt n 1'lJl�i`C'ti�laltiti 1 ierb A !'+ is cinia granda cucurbit ac'mL Ik r, Gout -0 V111 ' A f.'!«Tcrlrrr rr,ti t. Fabai_'enc ft�3LtIebox 1-Iorb A C�a'WrcaWf cicacAAW Pilaacc ac 13L'r111LI.dd Gra."S I icrh A Besmlacaraahus vir carar.r Fal lceatc Slender Mirno1 u SIlrl1h A DC'4'T7a(} 1aa11n virc'f rlTrir: Fal��alre le' DesillodllLrll I vi A Di Jilarica cidacari,s Poace: Crab --ass I Ied) Df ilaria alrsidalis Pciacc ac Sour r'ass l lrrb A f.t1 ffcaria,sefi gena peac:ca': C'ra.bmtass I Ierl) A Dl's Llmnica ca1"rt:rraw C hLnlo poclillccalc C7vs Mania 1 I1`r11 A }Llear,s•ine indaa:'ca Poaceac C;uosc Crass Herb A E'rggroslis tenelf , Poaceae Lovegrass Herb A i .Ipl1.4 et°afltato Irarlf afercl M lr'acffrcaS a I_anliace:le Fabaceae Comb Rypti.s Indigo SI'Ir11b Shrub A A 1pomoc3ca obxCtu!'ea C.'0171VO[VulacCae Ob;curc r "1'I Ll1 111111, G tol , Vine Kaf a31C'hm, pildf ata C'rassulaceac Air P1311t herb A L ant apw cam ara Vtrhenaceae Lantana Shrub A &,'€3nOPS ne e l`116710 1_.amiacca a Lion's Lai, lierb A I.L'ad{.'Cfepm-f !l rrc rac'ct Ji711 £1 11-abaceaex Ha€ale K€aaa Shrub A MalvasT!•um Coro TaaClltc e 1h runt !] MNlvacraac False Mallow Shrub A AAy athvr-ous as Ldliu. Poai~tiie t.wim:it Grass Herb A Ar e ina s- realas Paaaccae Natal Red Top 1 ferb A i7ficrreT1 O mherosa CO nvo I vat l;1. c k: ae. Woodrose Ville A Milr1{'!sa ] ubco Fabticcdc sL nsiti've Plant Herb A 1 f"�TTT{aT"f IT#=f7 G'17Larirl31T67 C.0 LI]'bitaaccac B]tier'CIourd Nne A Bicho is ai Survey, 7M 3-7-6-21. Imircels 16. 17, 18 & 19 ])rage 12 Table 1. contnwQd Common name Status A cricloihe res tristfs CY]IIuncin Myna Scientific Name Family Common Name Lite Form Stahls* Pc7cc{r4crA?L.Nfa PLibiaccac Mailc Pilau l hie A f} arf{7/C?'A?h7 m hisft"J'e,, rlrr,r ?o- f {7sslf,orCa a'.c oh's i., .C'L' 1'fitink+go _L'L:•;.1!i cia Astec'.` ccac Pas5tficiraccac Euph?tbiaccac Fa bacea PI�1171bs1gLI11LtC:14 Plumba rinaceae : mita Maria Lillkoi Nii-tirl DLllcc I_,J1114'Lt11 IIiL='c i Icrh vine 1±211) T reo i 51art11� Herb A A A A A�{1ilAAi11+,�f}ar:!' I f'r)rrrrr',r, cr r r'�,ti,r Portutacamae HaiIY Pigweed Hcrb A Reel -billed I.Lioth,rix Fabaccae KILLL1'i< Tree A I'.s irdi1,1:; � +,a <+'.;r Myrtaceae Cclintr]oll Ouava Tree A 1711';;fry hlrr.mh., 1'I)4tolaccaceae Coral Berry herb A 1flcwP .,0ti r.'r:i ;?F?1LPF s Luphorbiaceae Castor lean Shrub A &-hbmt wrcll ini`hiffilms Anacardiae--£Fie Christmas Berrie Shrub A .Sc711![.1BCU 1tt1)P n I abaceae Monkey od Tree A PcY'rr{('nic7{i,s Fal_iaccac Coffec Senna Shrub A fPL?i! rrt�1['r.X: I1' alSr`c`4ct'ac IILt11a Shrub I "ic{ci d 17crA�A , fr31�cA Mak aceac Si Lill I k2rh A Sido _VPlF?0_YeI klalvaceac Si& I lcrh .Sonc1'+rt.i A.sicmcc:t4 Sow Thi sIle Hirh A .Scare± wni ctrrrc'r•ic•c1ltish) Solailacef e Pig oIo Herb ?f rlC�Y�rdJt� .St'f7 rrYf a crt�aam olaiia Cae Vining Solanum Herb A S' c 1{TrJc eCt c'caaar �cA�r;rlcrrcc Bi loili,jcieac AlFI'(: rt Tulip Tree A Yhvve#acr pemvian-( A ocynaixac fie-Still Trcc Tree A flAranhtfrsAfrcl frag'i•e ns Acanthace-ac Whitk: Thunber -a V111 C A I+'r7�+']a Frftr r{rekra�hcaAelc'e7 Tiliaceac I Bur Bush I Shrub A kl,�11(1?ertc7 rmfic f Sterculiaccae I `Uhaloe I Shrub I * A -Aber± F FnilcmIL: I Ii1cli"211OLIS PI= Polynesian END--FQdeml and Sia c i.isted fndaiwci,L�cl;nc no) 'Fable 2. Bird 4 tries Observed in Survey Arra Scientilir name Common name Status A cricloihe res tristfs CY]IIuncin Myna Allen Resident Arcam o:�n Parakeet Alicti Resident lit61dc: fr dyis CattIc L-gret Alien Resident Co[ ,Chi1C1hv ci7rdfr7C lis N0i'lhern Cardinal ,'lion Resident Cenpoilveim- me-vicanzis House Finch Altai± R:si-dent FrrrrAc.ohirms ]r}PPC.ecerler1 my Mack Frarrcolin Aber) Resident (h'dt 7c'{i« srracrrcf Zebra Dove Alien Residiem Lcio(hri_k f1th[r Reel -billed I.Lioth,rix Aber± Resident b nc'hpit-tj Infacm1eitct NwrticL,'Manilikin alien Residelm h7A:/47 {l q.zi►'r) v I J1 )V.k '��Ir i o1 % Aken Re,.Ident }'rr.sser dnrnewcor I IOLI e ti Nti TOW Alien Resident Serums Yellow-Fromcd Cama ,Hien Resident Sica{i,s 11471,cfV47 Safti_011 Finch Alien Resident Sir ?f0 }el'o chOcn.vlr S oncd Dove AkLni Resident zoster[pk.;o 1omcf i.+ la Luic',C whitc-e-ye Alicti Rcsidlent Biolo icai Survey, IM 3-7-6-21. Imirccls 16, 17, 18 & 19 Page 13 APPENDIX 4: Cultural Impact Assessment SCS 42400 t: LA -1 A CULTURAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR A 78.122 -ACRE PROPERTY 1N HOLUALOA I`' AHL;PUA`A, NORTH KONA DISTRICT, RAWAPI ISLAND, IIAWAI`I ITMK: (3)7-"21:016-01 1 Prepared By. €Tenn G. Esc4utt, M.A. Thomas Dols, M.A. JUNE 2020 DRAFT Prepared for: Kona Three, 1.I.0 101 Hualt7.lai Street Hilo, fil 96720 �'�t��r���c�car��� 1.r.,�wa- ����t��rw ►� 13.1.7 Kapi-olard Bonlcvird. Suite 409 Honolulu. Ht 96814 Hawaii 1s1:ind Office: PO Bax 155 111 96749 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF .--........ ........ --.... .............. _...... ....... -... .-... ...... -.-....... .D LISTOFTABLES ............. ..................... ........ ................ ........... ......... ........... -'-................. D NiETHODOLOIGY................. ....................................................................................................... 7 ARCHIVAL RES E&@CF{---____ ........... ____ ....... -...... -...... .-........ ___ ...... _-'8 INTERVIEW METHODOLOGY.. ...... --...... .-........ -_...... -...... .-...... ...... .......... 8 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS ...... '............... ........ __.-''.--.-_....... '...... ll PRL -CONTACT ERA .................................................. ................................................... l3 THE KONA FIELD SYSTEM-- ............................... ............. .................. ......... ........ l4 P{} ERA.---. ......... ......... ......... .................. ........ -..................... ]5 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES ............ ...... ...... ..--_...-..'...... .._..,,-.- 21 0EG0]NAI. PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES ...... .'-..-^...-................. Z4 CURRENT PROJECT AREA SPECIFIC PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGY .............. - ... 29 CULTlJ1L,kL INFORMANT INTERVIEWS ............................................................................... 38 SUMMARY--.-----_ ........ _-.-,_-.--_....... -,...... .... -...... .---.-.-----....... .-39 CIA rNQCJlRYRESPONSE .................................................... ................................. '-----'_-4O CULTURAL ASSESSMZ�vI)4T-... ...... ----_--'_-.-.----'-----_-----------4| lama 90,10lown big { LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: 5,500 K-Scries Map of11awaVi Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo% 2443_ Data Sources: Nti iiional Geographic Society. USCiSI__--....... 2 Figure 2: 7.5-11+'linnic Scrics L1SGS Topographic Mqp Showing the Location of Project areas and TM Parccls (K.calakektia Quadrangle. ESRI, 2413. Data Sources: National Geographic and County ref Haw•ai`i Planning Department, 2019)-. ................................ 3 Figure a: Aerial Photograph Showing Project Area, Wualoa, Hl, Zones 5 North, 189445 rn E, 2171790 in N. (ESRI, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Glove, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USCS)......................................................................................................... 4 Figure 4: Acrin1 11hotograp11 Close -Up Showing Project Area, H61uatoa, H1, Zone 5 North, 189444 m. E:, 2171790 m N. (ESR[, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GcoEye, Earthstar, USDA., and USGS)...... ......................... .......................................... 5 Figure 5: Map of Holualoa I"" and 2°`3 Ahupua'a Showing Location of Project Area in Red Border (Alexander 1855). -- ....... ................ ........ ....... ...... 12 Figure 6: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Railroad and Prqlect Area (USES 1928)............................................................................,.,...... 16 Figure 7: Portion of Kai lata Section. 'North Kona Map Showing Location of LCA 7713 and Project Area in Rcd Border (Aki 1952,)........................................................................ 18 Figure 8: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Land Commission Awards, Land Grants, and the Project Area i Na iional Geographic Topal. 2003, Kailua Quad. Data Sources: National Geographic Society. USGS)..... ...... I .... I ...... I ...... — ...... 19 Figure 9: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic, Map Showing LoeMiun of Previous Archacsaln tical Studies and Prcyject Arca (Kealakekuar Quasi, ESRI, 2013. Data Sources: National GcogTaphic Society, USGS)............................................................ 23 Figure 10. 7.5 -Minute Scrics LJSGS Topographic Map Showing location of Northern Poilion of Hammatt et al. (1992) Sites and Current Project Area (ESR 1, 2011. Sources: rational Geographic Society. USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle) ................................................. 30 Figure 11: 7.5 -Minute Series USES Topographic Map Showing Locations of Escott and Ewott (2019) AIS Project Arta Archaeological Sites (ESRI, 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society. USES. Kcalakekua Quadrangle) ................................................. 35 LIST OF TABUS Tachlc I - [..arid Cornmissioti awards Recorded in Iiolualoa I" and 2nd Ahupua`a...... ................ 20 T:ihlc ?: 1 m cnbDry ol- Previous Archaeological Investigations ............ .......:......:.................. ........ 21 I <i17L, _a; I ilvenlory of llroviously Recorded Archaeological Sites (Hammatt et al. 1992, Hammatt andShideler 2oo,7) . ....................................................................................................... 31 I-aihle 4: Inventery of Archaeological Sites Identif'ied on the AIS Project Area (Escott and Escott 201 K). ......... ....... ...... 34 I :Tie 5: Inventory of Escott & Escott (2020) Archaeological Sites. ............. ......... 37 11 INTRODUCTION At the request of property owner Kana Three, LLC, Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted a Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA) of 76.121 acres of land TMK: (3) 7-6- 021:01.6, 017, 019, and 019 located in Holualoa IA Ahupua°a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii, Hawai"i (Figure 1 through Figure 4). The owner is proposing; to develop the property and contracted the CIA as part of an Environmental Assessment (EA) as required for County of Hari+ai'i Planning, Department permit applications. The point of contact (owner) for the project is heir. Richard Wheelock. The owner's mailing address is 101 Iltta]Alai Street I~lila, 1-11 967M Mr. Wlicelock can also he contacted by ctnail at richard(ci:east�,k cstrealty.org or by phone at 808 - ?53 -3107. The Constitution of the State ofHawni°i clearly states the duty of the State and its agencies is tea preserve, protect, and prevent interfiurence with the traditional and customary rights of native Hawaiians_ Article XTI, Section 7 requires the State to "protect all rights, customarily and traditionally exercised for suhsistcrice, cultural and reli-ious purposes and possessed by ahripita'a tenants who are descendants of native Hawaiians who inhabited the Hawaiian. Islands prior to 1778" (2000) In spite of the establishment of the foreign concept of private ownei`ship and WCAel-n-style goverivnent, Karrmehameha III (Kauikeaouli) presl:*rved the people's traditional right it) .,ubsistence. As a result, in 1850 the Hawaiian Government coiitirmcd [lie traditional access rights to native Hawaiian aintpua `ra tenants to gather specific natural resources for customary uses from undeveloped private property and waterways under the Hawaii Revised Statutes (VIRS) 7-1. In 1992, the State of Hawaii Supreme Court, reaffirmed HRS 7-1 and expanded it to include, "native Haw -a" an rights. --may extend beyond the ahrrpr�rcr `a in which a native Hawaiian resides where such rights have been clisiomariland traditionally exercised in this manner" (Pele Defense Fund v. Paty, 73 Haw.578, 1992). HAWAIIfHAW061P CC* -. iia iixum e • e 4 i x y tl - q «e ry .501 d s y � k.. • .... r' ° Y r Figure 1: 5,500 K -Series Map ofHawai'i Showing Location of Prolea Area (National t Teo4,ri'g)hic Topo!, 2013. Data Sources: Naflonal Geographic Society, USGS). 2 ti". II7T 0 LO '7 v I % KEV' Figure 2: 7.5-Minuic Series USGS Topographic Map S1u45.t i I I i.: '!.— Jf ion of Projecl Areas and TMK iKcalakekLm Quadrangle- SSRI, 2013. Dam Sources: National Geographic and ol-Havvari Planning Deparimcm, 2019). 3 Fivury i; Aerial I'hotograO Showing l'rojvot Ari. Holualoa. ill, boric 5 North. Iii' 445 in l:•:, 21717 11 in N. (ESR 1, 013 IM4,0 Data Sources: Digital Gtobe. GcooEvu. Earthstar. USDA. and USGS b. Fi urc 4. ', i.iI P1WI , =r:III [ Iose,l'I1 Shoring Project Ares, I-101u4i1ta, I fl, Zone 5 Neral, 189445 rn E, 2171790 m N. (F5R.l, 2013 I mage. D'aid Si}4 rccis Diff is I Glok, GLoEye. Eartlist.ar, USDA.. and USGS). Act 50, enacted by the Legislature of the State of Hawaii (2GOO) with House Sill 2895, relating to Environmental Impact Stater nents, proposes that: .-.there is a need to clarify that the preparation of environmental assessments or environmental impact statements should identify and address eifiects on Hawai`i's culture, and traditional and customary rights... [H -B- NCS_ 28951 - Act 50 requires skate agencies and Cather developer to assess the effects of proposed land use or shore hne dovelopments on the "cultural practices of the community and date" as part of the HRS Chapter 343 environ inentaI review process (2401). Its purpose has broadened, _'to promote and protect cultural beliefs, practices and resources of native Hawaiians [atndl other ethnic groups, and it also amends the definition of `significant effect' to be re -defined as "the sum of effects on the duality of the environrncrit including actions that are... contrary to the State's environmental policies... or adversely atTect the economic welfare, social welfare, or cultural practftes of the community and State" t.ii.13. 2.895. Act 50. 2000 , Thus, Act 50 requires an assessment Of cultural practices to be inclUded in the Envirnnxnental Assessments and the Fn irownental Impact Statements, and to be taken into consideration during; the planning process. The concept of geographical cxpunsion is recognized by using, as an example, "the broad geographical area, e.g. district or afrlipirca `u" (0EQC 1997). It was decided that the process should identify 'anthropological' cultural practices,. rather than social' cultural practices. For example, !hind (edible seaweed) gathering would be considered an anthropological cultural practice, while a modem -day marathon would be considered a social culturaI practice. According to the Guidelines for Assessing Cultural lanpacts established by the liawaii State Office ofEnviromnental Quality Control: The types of cultural practices and Beliefs subject to assessment may include subsistence, corrzmerc:ial. residential, agricultural, access -related, recreational, and religious and spiritual customs. The types of cultural resources subject to assessment may include traditional cultural properties or other types of historic sites, both marunadc aril natural, which support such cultural beliefs (OEQC 1997), 6 This Cultural Impact Assessment involves evaluating the probability of impacts on identified cultural resources, including, values, rights, beliefs, objects, records, properties, and stories occurring within the project area and its vicinity (H.E.. 2895, Act 50, 2000). METHODOLOGY This Cultural Impact AstieSS nei7n 'ti ads prepared in accordance with the nicthodology and content protocol prop idcd in the Guidelines I -or Usessing Cultural Impacts (OEQC 1997). In outlining the "Cultural Impact Assessment Methodolo&,", the OEQC slates, .. ,information may be obtained through scoping, ccammunity meetings, ethnographic intervie.",,;and ora] histories,.- (1997). The report contains archival and documentary research, as well as communication with organizations having knowledge of the project area, its cultural resources, and its practices and beliefs. This Cultural Impact Assessment was prepared in accordance with the methodology and content protocol provided in the Cuidc}lincs Cor Assessing Cultural Impacts (OEQC 1997). The assessnlenl concerning cultural impacis should address, but not be limited to, the followinir matters: (1) a discussion of HIO t11ethcxls applied and results of consultation with Individuals and organization; identified by the preparer as being familiatr with culiural. pr-acticos and features associated %vith the projccl area, including any constraints of li mttatlons with might have atfected the quality of the inf"onmation obtained; 4'?} a dcscriptior of methrrds adopted by the preparrcr to identify. locate. and select the persons interviewed. including a discussion of the level of effort undertaken; (3) ethnographic and oral history interview procedures, including the circumstances under which the interviews were conducted, and any constraints or limitations which niiglit have affected the quality of the information obtained; (4) biographical information concerning the individuals and organizations consulted, their particular expertise, and their historical and genealogical rekinionship to the project area, as well as inlorniation concerning the lice -sons SUbininin information or Inters iewed. their particular know I Qd,,c and cultural expertise, if any. and tlaCir hi tc?rical and gericalogica�l relationshLp to the project area; 453 a discussion coticcrniitg historical and cultural source materials consulted, the institutions and repositories searched, and the level of effort undertaken, as well as the particular perspective of the authors, if appropriate, any opposing views, 7 and any other rele,,ant constrami(s, hinitations or biases; (6) a discussion concerning the cultural resources, practices and beliefs identified, and for the resources and practices, their location within the broad geographical area in which the proposed action is located, as well as their direct or indirect .i= iiicatice or connection to tlzc prv_ic�t site; (i) <i discussion concerning the nature of the cultural practices rind beliefs. and the significance cit Ole cultural rc4ources within the project arca, affected directly or inn rtictl% by the proposed project; (8) an explanation ofconfidcratisl information that has bcen withheld from public disclosure in the assessment. (9) a discussion concerning any conflicting inforniation in regard to identified cultural resources, practices and beliefs; (10) an analysis of the potential effect of any proposed physical alteration on cultural resources, practices or beliefs; the potential of the proposed action to Is€tlate cultural resources, practices or beliefs from their setting; and the potential of the proposed action to introduce elements which may alter the setting In a hick cultural practices tame place, and; (11) the inclusion of bibliography of references, and attached records of interviews, which were allow•ecl to be disclosed. Based on the inclusion of the above information, assessments of the potential effects on cultural resources in the project area and recornmendations for mitigation of these effects can be proposed. ARCHIVAL RESEARCH Archival research focused on a historical documentary study involving both published and unpublished sources. These included legendary accounts of native and early foreign writers; early historical journals and narratives, Historic: maps and land records such as Land Commission Awards, Royal Patent Grants, and Boundary Commission records; historic aec:ount.s, and previous archaeological project reports. INTERVIEW MET•IIODOI,OGV Interviews are conducted in accordance with applicable state laws and guidelines.. Individuals an&or groups who have knowledge of traditional practices and beliefs ociated with a protect area or who knew of historical properties with n a project area are sought for consultation. individuals who ]havc particular know ledge of traditions 8 passed down from preceding generations and a personal familiarity with the project �u-ea are invited to share their relevant information.. Often people are reconl$neuded for their expertise, and indeed. organizations, Such as Hawaiian Civic Clubs. tate Island branch c)I` Office of Hawaiian Affairs (011A), historical societies, Island Trail clubs, std Planning Commissions are depended upon for their recommendations of suitable informants. These groups are invited to contribute their input, and suggest further avenues of inquiry, as well as specific individuals to interview. If knowledgeable individuals are identified, personal interviews are sometimes tard and them transcribed. These draft transcripts are returned to each of the participants for their review and comment;- After corrections are inade, each individual signs a release farm, making the infontration available for this study. When telephone interviews occur, a surnmary of the information is often sent for correction and approval, or dictated by the informant and then incorporated into the: document. Key topics discussed with the interviewees vary from project to project, but usually include: personal association to the cIhrfpmr 'u_ land use in the project's vicinity; knowledge of traditional trails. gathering areas, I.V, ter snui-Ces, religious sites; place names and their meanings; stories that were handed down concerning special places or events in the vicinity of the prgject area; evidence of previous activities identified while in the project vicinity. In this case, letters with reaps and descriptions of the project arai were sent to individLMN and organi7atioils whuse jurisdiction includes knowledge of the area with an invitation lbr consultation. Consultation was sought from Jordan Kea Calpito , SHPD Burial Sites Specialist; Kamakana 1*erreira, OHA Compliance Off=icer; Nicole Lui, cultural descendant, Sean Naleimaile, State Historic Preservation Division (SI-fPD) Hawaii Island Archaeologist; Kekoa Nezara, Kona Hawaiian Civic Club President, Shane Felson, OHA, West Hawaii Represerrtative; and J, Curtis Tyler 111, cultural descendant, Consultation was also conducted via telephone with Gregg Kashiwa who served as the project property manager for parcels 016 and 017 in the early 1980s, .Public notices (Appendix A) were placed in tate December 2019 issue of the Office of Hawaiian AtTairs (011A) Ka Wal Ola Newspaper_ Public notices were also published in the Honolulu Star -Advertiser, and the West Ha a,i`i Today on November 17", 20"' and 21-m 0 If cultural resources erre identified based on the information received frons these organizations and. or additional informants, an assessment of the potential effects can t1l'• identified cultural resources in the prgjiect area and recommendations for nritigat ion of these effects can be proposed. Public notices were not published in local arid.`or regional publications. PROJECT AREA :NATURAL ENVIRONMENT The Current project area consists of undeveloped land used as cattle pasture for several decades. Prior to tt7.31, cotTee was grown in the northeast quadrant ofthe project arca. The project arta is sittiated on fairly steeply sloping land with level areas in between elevation breaks. The project area is between 360 and 660 Feet (1 10 to 201 meters) above mean sea level (amsl). The project area lands are part of a large former cattle ranch and agricultural area that was started in the early 1900s. The prciicct area is still used to pasture wattle. The project area lands were bulldozed sonic IIme hetv.cen the 1940s and 1970s. Evidence ofbulldazhig is visible in aerial photographs a: alternating banns of cleared bulldozer tracks and rands of push pile (see Fivure 4), Pedostrian survey confirmed the linear bands in the aerial photographs are bulldozer -cleared paths and linear piles of bulldozed rock along the cleared bulldozer paths. The former Kana Sugar Company railroad bed is present clang the eastern edge of the prcalcet arca, The project area ground surface is a IJualalaI lava flow dating bctivecn 5,000 and 10,000 years before present (y'bp) (Wolfe and iMOMS 1996). Soil in the praPj ct arca is Punalu`u Series (rPYD series) extremely rocky peat with six to twenty percent slopes (Sato 1973;48)• The majority of the project area has hee17 br.11dnzed in the Masi and the present ground surface is rooky soil. Rainfall in the project area is very low. less than thirty inches per year. Parcel 018 and Parcel 019 are seasonal gulches that drain rainfall down slope to the west. This region is extremely dry, hot, and somewhat barren except for thick California grass (Urochloa rrruricu). Guinea grass (Megarb'i�rsus matvhnus), and some kora haole (Leacciona leucocephahi), kim e JProsapis pallida), and kfikvi rin( (Aleurites mobjecana) trees (Starr Environmental 2016). 10 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS Kana is divided into two sections: Forth Kona or Kona 'Jkwr. and; South Iona, or Koran henna (Maly 1996). Kona 'dkarr was further subdivided into north (called Ked:aha-wiai-'ole-o-na-Kona) and south (called Konaken 'ijI et) tins, with the division between the two at the aalnip aa'a ofKeahuolu. The project area is in Holualoa 1' Ahupua`a (Figure S) within the area of Kerma kcaa `a`yma in Kona `akau. Wlualoa means (literally) "lore sled course" (Pukui etat 1974:40. Hdlualoa l" is a traditional cahulma'ca stretching from the oceaiy to the font ofHua lalai in the u1)1aitds. The coastline ofHalualoa I" Ahupua`a is primarily Iow rack cliffs. Very little is recorded of 116lualoa Ahupua'a in traditional oral accounts. The Heart Stin•Ing Legend of Ka -M rkl, published in the Hawaiian language newspaper KO Baku v Hm aii and translated by Maly (1993) contains the only description of f-Ioltaaloa. The legend is set in the 13`h centUry but also reflects more recent 1niliiences (Make and Maly 2002:17). Accordine to the narrative, The lands of Holualoa were named for the chief of that name, both Holualoa and Puapua'a were high chiefs. who controlled the lands from rnr}untain t) sea, which boar their mamas--- Kalrraokalan1 serve€i as a priest ofHolualoa at the temple of l'a.kiha. This heiau was near the contest field of Holualoa... The lands of this region are narned for various rah `i, all of whom were related. When the chiefhi6lualoa took up the challenge against Kepaka'ili'rrla on behalfof the Kona chief's, Holualoa called upon his god K rlcaa�vcalarur to assist hiiii in his battle... IT61ualoa was the rust chief to cal upon the god KulailWihoa, and this was the beg, inniiig cif (Itis god's use by the chiefs ofHawai°i [Maly 1993:209-209]. Figure 5: Map of ii6luakos 1" and 2 n" Ahupua`a 5ho%k- ng Location of Project, Area in Red Bonier (Ales;inder 1855), 1? PRE -CONTACT ERA H61ualoa, Kona, and much of the Iceward side of lawal'i Island, while well populated at the time of European Contact, were settled later than the windward side. This in part inay be due to the fertile land, nUnrerous streaans, and abundant rainfall on the windward side (Maly 1996:3). Many, archaeologists believe that Hawaii Island was first settled around A.D. 1,000 by people sailing from the Marquesas (Athens et al. 2014, Dye 2011; Kahn et al. 2014; Kirch 2011; Kirch and McCoy 2007; McCoy 2405 and 2007: Mulrooney et al. 2011: Keith et al. 2011; W ilmhurst et al. 2011 a and 201 lb). During early settlement of (lie leeward side permanent habitations were established in Kona concentrated along the shoreline and lowland slopes (Cordy 1981, 1995; Schilt 1984). Inforinal fields were cleared at higher elevations where rainfall was higher. Be(ween AD 1200 and 1=1400, habitation and agriculture expanded across the slopes and coastal area OfIivalalai (13Ur(Chard 1995; Cordy 1995). The initial constniction of the Kana Field System (KFS) Degan approximately between AD 1400 to 1600(SchiIL 1984). The developmcni of these extensive formal walled fields coincides with a dramatic population increase and with the development of khe stratified chiefdom structure which is reflected through large residential complexes and (odic (Burtchard 19,95; Curtly 1981: 1 faun et al. 1998,1Tommon 1986; Schilt 1984). Thug, there was a need to expand the previously limited agricultural base. The royal centers and larger heiau w= in place by Ali 1600 to 1800 which reflect the growth in power of the rulers, and chief's in the region (Rarrera 197 1. Hammatt and Falk 1980). Royal canters arc located at Kailua, Hblualoa, Kahalu`u, Kealakekva, and 14onaunau (Cordy 1995)• The region ofHolualoa developed into a royal center in the late 1600s to early 1700s under the reigns of Keakamahana (reigned 1680-1700) and Keakealaniwahine (reigned 1740-1720) (Cordy 2400:244). Mang 'aff `i and konohrki residences and ntimero" religious sites are known to have existed here. The nYajority of the heiau and royal residences were constructed along or near the coast. most notably at Kamoa Point south of the project area. The royal center at Holttaloa was eclipsed in the second half of the 1700s by thea royal center in the Kahalu`u and Kc,anhou ro,,10n. 13 THE KONA FIELD SYSTEM The Kona Field System extends north at least to Kau Ahupua'a and south to Honaunau, west From the coastline and east to the forested slopes ofHuali lai (Cordy 1995). During his travels in 1823. William Ellis noted the extensive field system divided with "low stone walls, made of fragments of lava", producing "bananas, sweet potatoes, mountain taro, taps trees, melons and sugar carte" and "flourishing luxuriantly in every direction" (Handy and Handy 1940.114 and 162). Many of the archaeological projects conducted within bona deal with components of the trona Field System (Cordy 1995; Newman 1970; Schilt 1984). The kola zone of the Dona Field System is from sea level to 150 rn amst. This none is associated with habitations along the shoreline and cultivation of sweet potatoes (uala), paper mulberry (wauke), and gourds (1pu). Clearing mounds, planting depressions, planting mounds, planting terraces, and modified outcrops are common agricultural features in the kala zone (Hammazt and Clark 1980; Hammatt and Falls 1980: Haun er rel. 1996; Schilt 1994). Permanent habitation 311cludrng royal and high chiefly centers as Well as non-agricultural activities such as fishing, ceremonies and burial. practices were ostially concentrated along the shoreline zone portion of the kula zone. The higher elevation zk>>tcs are the kala 'e u zone, Vpa'a zone and the 'ama'u zone. The current project area i� in (lie koh du rune. This wetter mg1on, is ahovc 150 to anisl where bread fruit, sweet pot (octi ({poinoeu i}crrr. lar �, ki. wanks:' (Broussonetirf papyryra), karo (Coloeasia escidenta), sugar cane (Saccharian sp. ), and other arboreal crops were grown (belly 1983, Menzies 1920). The 'cjw d zone is above the kaht'ulu zone. Hawaiians cultivated melons, sweet potatoes. ti, bananas, taro, wauke and sugar cane in fields with lou stone walls. The highest zone, the 'ama'tr zone, was used to grow bananas and plantains in walled fields. The "apa "ca zone and the "atria'n zone were also used to collect timber and catch birds therefore temporary habitations were constructed, 14 POST -CONTACT ERA During (lie post -contact era., the Kona Field System was exploited and the planting of coffee, sugar, sisal, citrus, and cotton took over original Hawaiian. crops until eventually the land was used for cattle pasture. The first cattle and sheep were brought to the island by Vancouver in 1793 and 1794 (Vancouver 1967). Horses, mules, oxen, goats, and donkeys were brought shortly after. neral cattle, sheep, and goats overran agricultural fields by 1813 to 1815 (Ellis 1963: 291; Wilkes 1970: 204). By 1848. in the Kona District, a gest Wall (the Kuakini Wall) was constructed from Lanihail to `Onouli to keep them away from homes and agricuItural areas (Maly and iNIaIy 2001;286). Formal cattle ranching began in the Kona region in the mid -1800s. The Kona landscape evolved rapidly with the turn of the century. The rapid. growth of the sugar industry produced the Kona Sugar Company in 1899. A railroad was built in 1901 to help sustain this influx in produce. It was litter used to 11.11.11 lumber and freight along with the sugarcane. The rail line was seven miles long and extended frnrn. HC)lualaa to Ka'awaloa (Figure 6). Catton., tobacco, and sisal were grown in the dryer lands below the railroad (Felly 1983), The changing subsistcince and trade regimes developcd by incoming Furopean and American settlers, as we]I :is other historical factors, caused a depopulation c�l'the coastal areas of Kona. F anchiia were established at middle and tipper elevations, and farms were established in the uplands where rainfall was higher and the temperatures were cooler. Cattle ranching and clearing for sugar cane and coffee removed many of the endemic species ol'plaiits. The sti.ite of vegetation that existed prior to the pre -Contact era were replaced by koa haole (Lettcaena leucocephala). cure. (Prosopis pallida), and other newly introduced invasive plant species. 15 Figure 6: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Railroad and Project Area (USGS 1928). 16 t Figure 6: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Railroad and Project Area (USGS 1928). 16 Schools, churches, stores, and other businesses were also established in the uplands. During the late 1800s and early I900s, coastal Kona was no Longer the densely populated sociopolitical center it once was. It became a small cluster of Muses along the trail f orn Kailuat Bay to Keauhou (Tornonari-Tuggle 1993:15). Homesteads, ranches, aiwd plantations developed in the uplands during, this period as reflected in the pattern of Land Commission Awards (LCA) and Land Grants (LG) recorded during the Whele (Escott and Escott 0018). The project area is just 1nakai (west) of most of the land commission awards and is at the same elevation as portions of the land grants in the region. Based on historic documents, the project area and surrounding leis were likely being used for subsistence and commercial agriculture, as well as for cattle pasture from the mid to late I800s. The project area might have been used later than surrounding lands because of its steep slopes and very rocky soil, but based on aerial photogr-aphs. the project area was bulldozed sometime around the 1950s 1-brough the 19700 lin preparation for corrmmerc:ial agriculture, TRE MAHELE The Land Commission awarded the majority ofHNualoa I" and 2"d Ahupua`a to Vidovia Katz -Emaki Ka`ahutnanu IV, t ithina 14O ofHawaN Island and Croom Princess ofHawai`i as Land Cunimission Award (LC"A) Number 7713, `Apan�i43 (FI i�ure 7). Several smaller LCA. and LG properties were also recorded in the upland region of Hblualua I" and 2`1 Ahupua`a (Figure 8). Twemy four Land Commission awards were recordcd in HdIualoa I" Ahupua`a, the ahupua`a where the project area is located (Table 1). A portion of I .c' 1 ;{,{std to John G. Munn makes up a chin strip of land located through the center oi' dh current project area. With (lie notable exception of LCA #3660 anda few other large• I .(, r\s, the average award was 2.8 acres. most (n=16) were for less than 3.0 acres. Three Land Grants (LG #1592, 1.602, and 3630) were also recorded in Holualoa I" and 2na Ahupua`at. LG 41592 was a 25,0 -acre parcel sold to Kealalio and LG #3630 was a 38.2 -acre parcel sold to W.H. Cromwell. Almost all of the awards and grants were used as subsistence and commercial farm land, and same were used to pasture cattle (Escott and Escott 201.8), 1.7 Fignrr 7: Por[wri , fK;Lilu:i Sck-Iion, Noah Kolwi \ [it p Siht,YLk iw, Location of LCA 771:3 arxi PrqjeCt Arra in 1 k!d Border (Aki 1957). 18 T 0 > :x U WFI P" e. 6A Fit- MAOHMMI wf;%Tr "gurt 8: 7.5-lvljiitav Smos LS61S TOTW:%pphis: Map Showing Luemkm Ofl,4ind CommissioTi Awards, Ldml ('-A-;iW.1., and bPT(�]Lxl Area (National Geographic Tcpo!, 2003, KailkLa Quad. Data Sources: National Geographic Society. USGS). 19 Table 1: Land {:ommissicm Awards Recorded; in Holualoa ISI and 2-"" .khupua'a. LCA# AWARDED TO AHUPUA°A ACRES ;666 John G. Munn H61LLaloa 1" 1 1 1.5 4:10 Kekai Wlualoa 1" 1.7 552 Kauita 1161u-,doa 1" 1.9 w S4 Kcativck(rlulLC HojualoL 1" 11.27 5'9 Keilikuliuk axle W)klalou ?"" �M() K[10 LLiiauilJ I b-, I 1 ' 1.74 .993 0063 0107 Hann Naas 1 f II, ILL3iOZI 1`` 3.44 7:339 7340 7340:14 KiL,imiaL L._ K l;l 1 Hs hialo, i 1"" 11-ILI O:i i"' I101L —,,,L 4.15 15, 1.3 71=13 lt:il;l7e:: :,.i 110.1L t, -)a 1 1,94 7713 Ki LIII,1137,11LL I INtialc,7 I"&, HO1naloa Z Lar -c. 7746 Kamalhalu Wiluaaloa. I x.17 7794 KaLuikin 1 Halllalo.- 1 " 1.8 7990 PLL ul-a H61italoa. 1" 1.1 SO1 ? Ai o H61ual[ a 2" IA 8151 Hehena H61Lialoa. 1" 2.3 8223 Ikaiaka Holualoa 1" 3.5 9915 Limaliana 116lualoa 1" 142 5932 Luniame 1-E8lualna l" 2.98 10770 Pulloitc Ilalualoa I" 3 06 10400 Naainiakaohi HOlualoa 1`& Holualoa 3 3.5 20 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOOICAL STUDIES There are at lteast 26 previous archaeological rcports fOr lands ncar• the current project area, including studies in Puapual`a 2nd and H51uaIon l ", 2"d. and 3'i Ahupua`a (Table 4 and Figure 9). The studies were coriduclerl from the t:€ as[ to roughly 1,460 ft atnsl and enccaipass the didu region (0-500 ft), the kalu'ulu region (500-1,000 ft), and the lover portions of the 'ii, m a region (1,400-2,5CW ft). Results of the previous arch-aeological studies arc summarized below by elevation: studies numbered l through 1 s In I ablo 2 and Figure 9 are situated from the coast Io [ween Ka'ahumanu R P-hwaw• 0-360 0 ft amsl), studies 16 through 21 are located from above the Queen Ka`ahumattu HiZhwav to just below Hualalai road (306-760 ll anisl), and studies 22 thrOLIg l 24 ar above T Iual al al Read to just above Mamala;']oa Highway (1,100- 1.460 it ams]). Table 2t bivenmory of"Previous Archaeological Investigations. Project Number Reference Type of Study Arca in Acres results (Figure 83 I.and,rutn er at, 199[1 Archaeological N A 16 Sita Inventory Survey �'ali� et al. 200.1Recovery Arehacological Data N' A 10 Sites Carlson & Roscndahl ArclIneolopeal - 1990 Inventory Survey f,,:1 3 I-laun et al. 1999 Arcltacological LI 15 31 Sites Inventor, Su11•c 4 1TaInntail & Falk 1981 Archaeolo it.1l Sulvev til 20 Sill, 4 i-1•ainmatt ct al. 1986 Archaeologit-:iI S .,CV 20 21 Sites 5 Haun &Nrnry 2001 r1tYh;_ ,rll:LL, a1 Data I Site 14L'�f}VL'' E otr?i]13 Archaeologicalaeological ( ., }r'- 2 Sites tcs Invents Survey1 Archaeological 7 Sine}tc 1979 Reconnaissance Survey 6 Rack walls S Harnnim 19791h Airliaeolo Nicol Sorvcy 22 1 Sites 9 IiitmTllZitt l 979cArchaeological Surety 2; ;9 Sites Cenolly & Gunnesti Arcliacolovitial tt] 1979 R"-onnaissanee.5tu-VC 46.E ""ti Sacs 10 Haminait 1419a. Archai:vlog.Ic;i1 4U 11 Sites [ n veiitory 55ui-%cy 10 H:1111I?ltatt 1980 Arrliacolcagical Sttavey 98 Sites Excavation I I Nelson et al. ?l75 rlrclIneol )gIcal „t 2, SiI w In,ci3t��rw `.titu�c� 12 RVISCIILHIAl 19791rc I1,3Li1I;r`,v�;,l � � I Site ltcc on tt,u � fiance Siin o\ 21 Project Number Reference i ype of Study .Area in Acres Results (Figure 9) 12 Sochren 1980a ANbacr7logical lira 7 Sites Reconnaissance I;ur%rcv 12 Woltorth et al- 2000 Arclt,3colrL ical 9 7 Sites 113ve mor SLLL'tiCV 13 Barre1a 14Q5 fVchacolugical 17 _� L SL'4'sral ag. RLL+JIlu.Li ~ 1i1CC SLLi % Q,\k mounds Arc:Iimx logi1ca 1 12 (104 Features, 1:3 Hatm & Htmry 20L}{} 1 R? of Wrbich Were [It °cilttir� 5u1 t cv A,,Hcultural) 14 Rnscndahl 1989 AIrhaLc010gik!al Field E, `4l{iditied tfl7 ection Outcrops 15 Scliilt 1994 Atvhatological Study 17 1-14 Shits 16 Winker & Ruwadallll 104 67 Sites 1998 RCL:oInlais"alicc survey 16 & Goodrellmi Nivbavoly-Ica;l Data 1i}4 104 1; Site 1993 Recovery Maly & Rosendahl k%: II-Jeul'igical 16 2006 Prvscrwatlon mall 104 67 Siws 17 Hamman et al, 1992 :\1re€la,.•ologic:31 Survev 174 71 Sites 18 Scicel a 1980b rt lltic•olo icLd 16 1 Site 1 et4�rtiLLaLi ,:firer. SLLtk e ;Ir�li'aLk+l yiial 19 Rechtman2006 111N-eiu4ar~ SLII%ev 1'00IS 2Sites N Rosendahl 1988 Iilr,iclil31 iCal 17 17 Sites. l�e4Ll�1Li�Ll�a�iltc' Survc 20 Falter & Grave 1993 Archaacult v iw +l 17 17 Sites lnvetltc�r� �LI1-1aS' I Sitc (149 21 Dircks rt al. 201:x Areha�'ulcttirul 10-260 1-1 w,inric to laiau{n-} tiui't�y,Modena ei Farming F �ItLLM 1 22 C)esilcts et al. 20()4 Archaeological � 1 l I llLa11W� tCail InventorySurveyl'caturoi .7 23 Rechtman 2013 29 24 Sites Clark & Rechtman Archaco[ogical 6 Historic Era r4 , , 2006 Iinvento sull-ev Sites -1tt1t �ci?li}��ii tl 22 Prc-C oiltaot '> Escott & Escott 2 0 IN.[1 Inwiltory, Survcy and historic Era Sites 11rc-Contact Anhaeo[ogiL�al and Historic Era 26 Escott & Escott 2020 Survey 171�eal,Or�'Survey 73.122 Sites I Iscrlm.:d Find (Petrogly by 22 IN KFA rmztt I "HI , 0 rFu"rrxprrwir I ip N" 4.0 MR MIN ."r , - s - w"W�q Fir -Uri, 9: 7-�,-N-fi."Ltc S"i,!t L.-.SG.S 'I o[voraphic Map Shu13 Ing LrKLLtiOl� Of Pre% lous Archaeologic a] Stud iLN and I a ',2c z A uc.i (Kcalakekkia Quad. ESRI. 2613. Data Nitional (Jix)gruphic Society. 1� - 23 REGIONAL PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES 1. Landrum et al. 1990, and Calls et al. 2004. P14111, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory survey (Landrum et al. 1990) and SCS, Inc. conducted data recovery investigations (Calis et al. 20{ 4) at the Kahakai development project. The project area is located within the lower elevations of Puapua'a 2`1 Ahupua`a_ Pre -Contact era to early post -Contact era cave shelters, agricultural rock clearing mounds, burials, shrines, and a. passible heiau were identified during the AIS study. A heiau complex, several burials, and five pci-manent habitation sites were recornnicndcd for prescrvation. All of the Preservation sitcs are near the coast. 2. Carleson and Roseudah1 1990. PHRI, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory survey of 65 acres between Kuah ni and Queen Ka`allumanu highways in Puapua'a 2°`r Ahupua`a_ Their study recorded 64 archaeobgical sites including pre-C'olitact era habitation, agricultural, and burial sites. Scvcn sites were assessed as significant and recornmended for preservation (Carleson and Resc idahl 1990: 34). 3. Haim cit al. 1998. PHRL laic. conducted an archaeological inventory survey of the propos cd Alii Drive corridor through several ahupua`a. Numerous pre -Contact era site complexes were recorded in Puapua`a 2"`' and H61ualoa 1" through 4`t' Ahupua'a. The site complexes included a large number of ai-riculitiral Features. as well as hatlitation. burial, and ceremonial fcatures. 4. Hanimatt and Hili: 19111, and Hammatt et al. 1986..Two archaeological surveys were conducted osi a 20 -acre parcel of below Kuakini Highway. The first study recorded 20 sires, and [lir second recorded 21 sites. None of the sites were recommended for preservation Mammatt and Falk 1981: ii, and Hatnnum ct A. 1986: 87), The report also recommended that the single documented burial he relocated. 5. Haunt & Henr , 2001. Haun and Associates conducted an archaeological data recovery study tit a c -shaped enclosure located on 1.59 acres of land below Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway 6. Escott 2013..SCS c:onduc tcd an archaeological study on 1.962 acres of land near the intersection of Kuakini and [:ween Ka'ahumanu highways. Two historic era ranch walls were recorded duri ttg the study. 24 7. 5inoto 1979. Aki 5inuto recorded several Historic era ranch rock walls on a six acre parcel ofIand just mauka of Alii Drive. S. H,ammatt 1979b. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 22 acres just south of Kuakini Highway. Three archaeological sites were recorded during the study. Mone of the sites were recommended for preservation (Harnmatt 1979b. it, and 10). 9. l lammatt 1979c. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. eorducted an archaeological survey of 23 acres located in the near coastal portion of Mualoa. I" and 2"' Ahupua°a_ Thirty nine archaeological sites were recorded during the study. The report recommended that all burials. i ncl Lid Ing a known cemetery site be relocated ( ilummatt 1979a: 5). None of the remaining sites (pre -Contact era habitation and agriculture sites) were recommended for preservation in place. 10. Conally and Gunness 1979, and Flarnmalt 1979a and 1984. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 103 acres within the near coastal portions of H8lualoa I" through 4"' Ahupua'a. (Hammatt 1980)_ One hundred and thirty six archaeological situs were recorded on the project area. They included pre - Contact era habitation, agriculture. burial. and a ceremonial sites. The Hamman report rec:ornmended that a beiau (Site 6661) was significant and should be preserved in place (Haminatt 19W 4). The report also recommended that the single documented burial be relocated to the perimeter of heiau (Site: 6661) and preserved. No other sites were recommended for preservation. 11. Nelson et al. 2005. An archaeological inventory survey was conducted by Rechlinan Consulting on 28.4 acres located in the near coastal portion of Mluatoa 2"' Ahupua`a. A total of 22 sites containing 150 features were recorded. The sites were primarily pre - Contact era agricultural and habitation sites, though five burial sites, a possible heiau, and a trail were also documented within the project area, 12. Rosendahl 1578, Suchren 1980x, Wolforth et al. 2000. PHRI conducted an archaeological inventory survey of eight aures of coastal Hotualoa 0 Ahupua'a and recorded seveat archaeological sites including threc Historic era rock xalls, ihrt: residential sites, and Hi.kapaia Heia€t. 25 13. Barrera 1995, Haun & Henry 2000. Bar7rena (1996) recorded a possible burial platfor2ri, two habiitation site, agricultural rock clearing nrounds and modified outcrops during a rewtinaissance survey of 17 acres in near coastal H61ualoa 2"`' Ahupua`a. Haun and Associates conducted an archaeological inventory surNey of the property and recorded 12 sites with 1.04 features {Haan and Henry 2(MO:14). The majority of features (n=82) were pre -Contact era agricultural rock clearing mounds. Eleven permanent habitation and one temporary habitation feature were also recorded during the study. 14. Rusendahl 1909, PHRI conducted an archaeological field inspection of 6.0 acres of land just below Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway in Halualoa 2°a Ahupua`a, Several modified outemps were recorded in the letter report. There were no other archaeological features identified on the project area. 1S. Schilt 1984. The Bishop 1lriuseum conducted an archaeological NLUdy of'the KLLakini Highway Rcalignrient Project located roughly along present day Queen Ka'ahunianu Highway and recorded 39 sites Puapua'a 2"d and Holualoa I' and 2nd Ahupua-a. Twenty two of the sites were pre -Contact to early post -Contact era agricultural gardens and modified outcrops (rock clearing). There were also traditional habitation platforms and trails, its well as Historic era roads and walls rccorded &ring the study. 16. Walker and Rosendahl 1988, braves and Goodfellow 1993, and Maly and Rosendahl 2006. An archaeolo,­[cal reconnaissance survey (Walker and Rosendal}l 1988), an archaeological data recovery study (Graves and Goodfellow 1993), and an archaeological preservation plan (Maly and Rosendahl 2006) were cond[.Icted by PIA R1. Inc. for 104 acres in the upland region of Puapua'a 2" Ahupua'a- A total of 67 sites were documented within the project area, including traditional (KFS) sites, temporary habitation sites. three burials, and a heiew. The archaeological preservation plan recommended that the three burials be relocated to the heiau site, and that the heiuu be preserved as a formal historic preservation area (Maly and Rosendahl 2006). 1.7. Harnmalt et al. 1992. An archaeological survey was conducted by Cultural Su«eys Hawaii on 174 acres of land in the upland region ofHolualoa 1", 2". and 3"' AhuPeia-a. The praje:ct area lands had been heavily bulldozed during the ni.oderni era for rranching and agricultural purposes. Despite the bullduzing. seventy one sites were recorded during the study, including temporary habitation features•, ruck walls, agricultural features, and 26 three burial Sites. Many of the sites were determined to be associated with Historic era ranching and agriculture. 18. Soehren 19800. Soehren conducted an archaeological reconnaissance survey of 16.0 acres above (ween lCa`ahumanu Highway in the inland region of H61ualoa 1`" Ahupua`a (Soehren 1.980b). A single enclosure was identified during the survey. 19. Rechtman 2006. An archaeological I'M'e3310ry surVcy was conducted by Rechtman Cnn5ki1611g. I..1 C on a roughly care -acre parcel located makui of ween Ka'ahumauu Highway in Hcrlualoa 2'd Ahupua`a. 'Two rock wails were recorded on the project area. The report recommended no further work A the wall sites. 20. M. Rosendahl 1988, Fager & Graves 1993. Fager and Graves (1993) conducted an archaeotogi cal inventory survey of 17.0 acres just niauka Crf Chu en Ka`ahumanu Highway in HC51aaloa P Ahupua.`a. Seventeen sites containing 27 pre -Contact to early post -Contact era agricultural features, including ruck mounds, modified outcrops, C- shaped enclosures, terraces, walls, and rock enclosures, were recorded. 21. Dircks et al. 2013, Rechtman Consultirng, conducted an archaeological inventory survey of 10.266 acres of land located between 840 and 920 ft amyl in H61ualoa I" and 2`Ld Ahupua'a. One Historic cra to modern era homcsread/agrietrlture sitc (Miyose Farr) containing 149 #calures was recorded during ihQ sur cy. 22. Desilets et al. 2004. Destlets et al. (2004) conducted an archaMogical inventory survey of 11.7 acres of land in the Wpa a region ofHal ualoa I" AhupuWa_ A single site associated with Historic era and modern era homesteads, commercial agricullure (coffee), and ranching was recorded. Features included rock walls, roads, coffee terraces, and buildings. 23. Rechtman 2013. Rechtntan Consulting conducted and archaeological inventory surVey of 29 acres of land located in the Yrpa `a region of Holualoa I" Ahuptra`a, Twenty four sites were recorded. The majority of the sites were associated kvith Historic era and nnod m era homesteads, cr rnmercial agriculture. Features iriclrII-bed rock walls, roads, and remnants of'structures. A single lire -Contact era to early poli -Contact era residential and agricultural site was also recorded. 27 24. Clark & Rechtman 2006. Rec;lttman Consulting conducted an archaeological inventory sur- vey of 2.7 acres of land located in the 'crper tr region of H€alual era 151 Ahupua`a_ Six sites were recorded, including five ranch walls and an area of coffee terraces. A number of conclusions can be made from the previous archaeological studies. A primary conclusion is that the majority of habitation features, especially permanent habitation i'eatures, are located from the coast to about 360 h amyl, below the present day Queen Ka'ahumanu highway, The same is true of ceremonial features, burials, and, to a lesser extent, agricultural features. The density of agricultural features and habitation features, mostly temporary habitation features, in the upland regions between 360 A amsl and 700 0 amyl is much IOWer than the site density in the coastal kola and lower kahi'r{frr regions of the. KFS. The pre -Contact traditional Havvaiian settlement and agricultural patterns are strongly oriented to the kola and lower kahi 'alar regions. Evon though cattle ranching and cominer'c:ial ;agriculture may have removed some archaeological sites from the ground surface in the kalu'idu region, there appear to be fewer sites than at lower elevations. The majority of sites in the kolr )du region are KFS agricultural sites including rock ck ailra., mounds, modified outcrops, garden enclosures, and low garden walls. Within the lands of the current frgiect. it is clear that ranching and commercial agricultural practices havc removed and damaged many of the pre-C'olitact era sites f'rant [lie gramid surface (see the l aninlatt c9 al, 1. 992 sur11ntary below). Moreover, many of the sites identified near the current project area are associated with Historic era ranching* and commercial agriculture. A second conclusion is that the establishment of Historic era homesteads, ranches, and commercial agricult-ure seems to have removed. or obscured, the majority of pre - Contact era sites in the upper kcrlu'uhi and lower Wl)a'a regions. tc alight he that pre - Contact uses in these regions did not involve the construction of large or permanent r',:,i r s, as to the lower regions of Kona. It is also likely that Historic era ranching and corninercial agriculture in the lower `dpa n region have caused large scale land alterations through the use of bulldozers for pasture and garden. It is passible that traditional features were disassembled to Build rock walls and coffee terraces. -)8 CURRENT PROJECT AREA SPECIFIC PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGY 26. Rarnmatt et al. 1492. Lands of the current AIS study were sLjblect to an AIS Study conducted by Flammatt et al. (1990. That study encompassed 66.039 acres of land Nvithin the current project area located between 32+0 to 690 feet (98 to 210 meters) amyl [TM ]k: (3) 7-6-021:016 and 017] (see Figore 9. Project #17). "Che current project area is located within the northern portion of'the I larimatt et al, (1992) project arca. Twenty one archaeological sites and two areas of bulldozed modern planting "terraces" were recorded in the AIS report (Figure 10 and Table 3). Eight of the 21 archaeological sites (SIHP 950-10-37-10015, #50-10-37-10017, #50-10-37-10018, #50- 10-37-10020, #50-10-37-1003 1, #50-10-37-10033, 950-10-37-10034, and ##50-10-37- 109, hereafter abbreviated to the last five digits) were: recorded by CSH in tabular format only. Written descriptions of the remaining 13 site z, are in the CSH AIS report. Excavations were conducted at ten of the 13 sites. The AIS report included plan view ligures for four of the 13 sites. At the request of SHPD, additional site documentation for Sites 10011, 10012, 10031, 10049, and 10071 was submitted to SHPD in a letter report (Hammatt and Shideler 2007). Six of the sites were determined to be pre -Contact era, tour associated with habitation, one with agriculture, and one single fcaturc site (Site 1001') contained two burials. Fifteen of the sites were cicten-nined to be Historic era, sites, the Majority associated with coffee agriculture and cattle ranching. T".o Historic era habitation sites were also documented in the AIS study. The burials at Site 10012 were removed and reinterred off-praiect prior to 1983. The site was further excavated to ensure that all iwl had been removed. The site was then back-filled and leveled by bulldozer. The AIS recotniii etided no fut°tlier work at all 21 sites documented in the current project area. The Hammatt and ShIdelcr (2007) letter report repeated the AIS, recommendation that "all surface sites in the area were documented" in the AIS repolrt and that "significant material from the study area has been recovered and that further investigation would be of minimum productivity„ (kHamm.att and Shideler 2007:11). However, t11e aLithors recommended that the sites should be located to document their current conditions and to document the sites to prevailing SlfPD AIS standards. 29 >`3' 1. P �4 `" Ilk-OfI It %1"A 4 4 M�tll�l 1 rhlK Nii9.. wly4N4 � . �' hMI17j�, 4�., I VIM ted" w? 91Cr'11:4),IM.iR:I['4r 417-r 'S,ti '� '� ILnl�w •. r A . M.tl I h1AIA I..44i 141. IM*1 - tipth 41rr 1414INUO i °�/ 001 popF VK1 1i iJu 4441 r\ 14 6 54 loll IM VVI7 Y9L 14 9 11�MAii , � 4. I jury l41 Ftr 131 k �lv ' Ijl'.v Ify 71:14 M,9119dhM -*F �:, 'Fllill 1.++;!„ LLL " YtJSB � Fw. I1 U:1 br:.rlr.4,1. � ti"e NdIuYL'} v+rr. :v�5w PAllil 1 4 W I + 'wy h411n -!I P[h34:vwlw 44 41 1 0111 I tIM1Tia0 � IAIWIIM "1 I� i�!hl l•e I II: 7 ';-Minl,Ite Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Norlllem Portion of I larnmatt et al. (1992) Sites and Currkna 11rojta Area (SSRI, ?tit L Sources= Natiorad Geographic Society, USCrS. KcaJaLe%ua Quadrangle). 30 Ta hie 3: inv=1cry of Prcv lousiv Recordod Archacolugical Sites (14mmnalt et al. 1992, Hawmatt and Shidcicii-211)07k- SIHP # Will I CSH si 1,E# TYPE Kalform FUNC710)Mj A8- c lt,,irmu, AiG�E llretIsslorli-, EXCAVATION I.� In [wi,, cren,+ CULTURAL MATERIAL 3cmwrieshells 101 Platj 0 I'll L&, %1',111 1111.1191 11mhisroric L I u I 1,� 1'"lure Burial repmerred ciff-project 1001, 3 11 LOCIOMWO& LjiTtih 1111bilaILOn Prthistoric 4.5 ill -L�qfflre lotal. Fire femures & l3rc+igtcmic antifacts 100[5 13 Ter-nic� MatfC11-111 Ruad Bed Cuille P111111 Ifi-,;tLiLic HiMffl'k 0 1tuck ,lomids AL Cle-uing Hitwriv I 3 1.0 Ili %% id e I l=ilt I,, Platillml Ag- ClcarinL Hisanric I 0I.J.; I I u 1;nC!01,111-t! WLII AgriCRILUEe Hitkinc 1 (1163 1 1), 1 In I LE 111 k (,oj t Ip k.,x UofleC AQ Histalic 101114 ill plail'un), AL,. CIk,13w-n1,F Hi.qaric 10040 216 Tvrruce, 14+_r-i4:Uhldr-O Himuric I Oly+- 3 2 Tei -races 113bicalion Prehiskiric 1.0 X HJill %- U & ,1 ,11121 I All 0 Lillt of irlidden& Fire 1eature I 01`16K 233 LUCIUNUre I killi WILOH Prtlllstorii; 0-5 0.25 25 in ':tllall uiix)UIL6 lifillidd-ell 1006c) '134 Modified BILOTIatJOI71111 1-1.9bualion Hkialic 0.3 X D-5 Iyl VG & a small amount of suidden 1 WIT) 2.45 1;-S1lkvc EcwlowN %V-dVUlLLLN Hi -4016k: 1.0 X 0,5 m No arid'ms 101 1 1biIALOrI Pvt III N ki 1,1v I I N 17, 2;14 mc-lifik'I Bluly Ag. Vk-urintl Hiaffl'k ?.11 iyi squam total No iris S mal I amoun I of NIS in TL -.2 I k A I N I 11m klrms R.-mchim, Ag, Fli;Icmc 10074 2411 1 - no I CIS Lire Coffee Work Shed Hi.-Actrw I' L.13 M quare total I VC, ILL L le \11 w. hl-,, mi is artifacts I k 111,5 2 - 4 1 EnCIOSurc pi L, PC I,. Historic 31 In a latter to the County of Hawaii Department of Planning dated July 30, 2018, (Log- No. 2018.00878 Doc. No. 1807SN41), SI°1PD requested a new pedestrian survey to identify all archaeological historic properties present on the project area, and to update previous archaeolohlical documentation to include site: plans for each site with site boundaries and areas impacted by bulldozing,, pl>otographs of all sites and features, an assessment of their integrity. and site significance,. 25. Escott & Escott 2018. SCS conducted an archaeological inventory survey on a 5.0 - acre portion of Parcel 017 in tl1e SML[hc:ast portion or the current project area (Escott and. Escott 2018) and recorded twenty-two naw�' archaeological sites wvitllin the project area (Table 4 and Figure 11 }. Fifteen of the sites are single -feature sites. The remaining seven agricultural sites contained two to seven features_ A majority of the sites are agricultural terraces and complexes dating to the pre -Contact era to the Historic era. The agricultural complexes are located in the lawyer teener 'uhi zone, between 600 and 700 feet 4182 to 213 incters) amsl. Three of the ranch walls (Site 30595, 30601. and 3065) are the primary dividers of the five -acre project area. These Historic era walls have typical characteristics of ranch walls including cobble core fill and bi-faced inward sloping walls toward the top. They are approximately l .0 meter tall. Site 30602 and Site 30603 are Historic era ranching and agricultural enclosures constructed along wall. Site 317595 and ,wall Site 30601. These two wall sites are constructed auto the west edge ol'the Site 30592 railroad berm and post-date the railroad berm. The northern third of the project area only has two sites (Site 30591 and 30956). Site 30591 is an agricultural complex with six terraces. Portions of the sites were bulldozed in the early Modern era. Bath sites date to pre-Coniact to early Historic era. The terraces reflect Kona Field System features but etre roughly constructed that more elowly resemble Historic era commercial agriculture. Site 30956 is a rectangular Historic style hearth. The middle one third of the project area between wall sites 30595 and 30605 is within the bulldozed "terraces" portion of the project area- Site 30593 is a pre -Contact era to early past -Contact era lava tube burial. 'rhe burial will be preserved in place in accordance with a Burial Site Component of a Presc« ation flan. Site 30594 is an 32 agricultural terrace complex that resembles the Kona Field Systern but is more roughly constructed. Artifacts recovered from subsurface testing at Site 30604 suggest it is a Historic era agricultural teiTace. The southern third of the project area, south of wall Site 30605, contained six primarily agricultural sites (Site 30598, 30600, 30606, 30607, 30610, and 30611) and four Historic era sites (Site 30599, 34608, 30609, and 30612) with functions other than agriculture. The agricultural features included rock walls (Site 30598 and306O6), terraces (Site 30604 and 30610), and ag6cultural complexes with terraces (Site 34607 and 30610). The non-agrieultural features included three cnclosures (Site 30599. 30608. and 30609), and a refuse di -,poral area Liva blister (Site 30612). The cluster of these sites indicates their use for 1 listoric crit cc llfficrw ial agriculture. Twenty-nine shovel probes and two excavation units tested the sites. Marine shell fragments. a basalt flake and volcanic -glass flakes recovc• red during testing indicatc that Hawaiians likely used the area for limited agricultural purposes. However, the agriculturalterraces more closely resemble the remains of Historic era commercial agriculture. All 22 sites identified during the current AIS study were assessed significant ander criterion "d' as tlicy are likely to yield information important to history. The railroad berm is also significant under criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a significant L- onu'ibution to the broad patterns of our hislory and it embodies distinctive characteristics of the type, period, and method of ral]road bed construction. The railroad berm was recommended forpreserva#ion with preservation measures outlined in an archaeological preservation plan (Escott and Mello 2019b). The rest of'the sites require no further work. I -he burial is also significant under criterion "e" as it has important value to Hawaiian people and people of other ethnic backgrounds in tete state. The burial was recommended for preservation in place with preservation treatments outlined in a burial Site, Component of a Preservation Plan (Escott and Dello 2019a.), 33 'I`ahle 4: ln%,=tury of Archaeological Situ IdCntitied on Lhe AIS PwjLcL Area 1l_scut1 anti Eseuu 2018). Site N Site Type Features Site Funedon Age Testing ,3(}591 Agric1L11timl t. omplox i5 Agricttllurt: l'i'd-CCImiwa to Himedc F[ -F4 30593 RaikOLLl1 Bed unci BL rinl 1 Tawsportatiun Historic Era 3059; 30594 Llt%,l 1 10h 15L1riA Agricultural Complex 1 6 burial Agriculture Prv-Umlact Io Early Pea-Cnntut Era Pre -Contact to Historic Lia SP -1 & ' 30595 Rock Wall I Rtmehing Histatic Era 30590 Hearth I PYA Pretuiralicln Historic Era IU -1 30597 Rook Wall L Ram2lling Historic Era 30598 30599 Rock Mill Plafform & Enclosure I ? AgricOure•'Kariehing Ranching Agriculture -Contrici iu wii torn bra Historic Era SPA & 3- TU -.l 30600 Terrace I Am k:11I I Ura Historic Era 5P-1 301501 Rmk Wall I Randiing Himoric Era 30642 Errclesum L Ranch in L -AL, riculture Historic Era 5P-1. ?, 3 & 4 30603 3r1bd74 Enclosure Agricultural Complex 4 d FZ>II}4hI114-' A:2r1Ctllture A-r,LiIllurC Historic Era Pec; -Contact to Historic L'la SP -1 & 2 SP -1 30605 Rock W'nll I 1i.Illihm.L: :j.'riculwre HistaRC Era :ilyd)di Km -k Wall I It;Ilr.°I1i,1� ,1:'r tllruie T'rc4;'o1': nL to Historic Frll :�1,LI:t'll.lt4lr:ll 'C�n11llt'x ? :lrrscu WICPr.: CorIacLtu Historic Eiu SPA la SP ID ±t1P7:!ti 31,1611'' 1.1141{]\11r4 I.nelosune 1 1l"fIl'i(IiL Sinn ur. tI1l,Iodc Era. H'Il tric Em sI I(t1 o- ;I,I(d Terrace �gFklrrltll ll [.'11Hrpltx i 3 Agriculture AIPj 1111urL Pro -Contact to Hiswi'1{' I'. I".I i'rc 'nl 1iir.LlLl liioolii 1 1:1 SP -1 illi+): 1.iI%;L Mitiirl � rpt lll4l` Dimil1 E1741 ,?I Iti 1'r;l is MIS% .0 r1F KEY SIT r NK91 PRCUF(-T ARFA SITE SJI'V WHINDAR) RAILROAD BED ROCK WALL ThJ V 1141, mo W R 211 ti %tTF % N1 I' V lam C TC 34 Iti al' H V YK4:17 LI o A 4T%3 iJjl 44,11 \% z Figure 11: 7-5-Minutc Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Locations of Escott and Escott (2018) AIS Project Area Archaeological Sites (ESDI, 2011. Sourcos, National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle). 35 26. Escutt & Escott 2020. SCS conducted an archaeological inventory Survey Ott a 73.122 -acre portion ol'the current project area in. Parcel 016, 017 (loan), 018, quid 019 to idemify all archaeological historic properties present on the project area, and to update previous archaeological documentation ( see figure 10). Seventeen of the twenty-one sites previously identified in Hammatt et al. (1992) were located during the course of the archaeological inventory surrey study (Figure 10 and Table 5). Two of the previously documented sites (Site 10020 and Site 10034) relocated by SCS are natural bedrock outcrops and one site former burial site (Site 14012). The burials at Site 10012 were reinterred off -project in 198:x_ The four remaining previously documented sites (Sites 10017, 10033, 117{}49. and 10071) were bulldozed prior to the SCS fieldwork and the remains of the sites are no lon,:Tr present on the ground surface. Three previously undocumented sites were also recorded, including a portion of the railroad born (Site 30592), a small coffee shed enclosure (31 [91), and several ranch walls (31182). A singly petroglyph on a Idose cobble was recorded as Isolated Find 1 (IF -1 }. A total of 21 sites, 17 previously documx mated and four newly documentcd, were identified on the Project area and are documented in this report. Two ol`the sites (Site 1.4620 and Siic 100,14) werc determined to be natural geological features. Six of the sites were detennine+d to lac pi -c -Contact era, three associated with habitation, one with agriculture, a single petroglyph site, and one single feature site (Site 10012) formerly contained two burials. Twelve of the sites were determined to be Historic era sites, the majority associated with colf'ee agriculture and cattle ranching. Two Historic era habitation sites were also documented in the SIS study. One site (Site 10015) was determined to be a short segment of niadern bulldozer road. The burials at Site 10012 were removed and reinterred off -project prior to 1983. The site was further excavated to ensure that all irW had been removed. The site was then back -tilled and leveled by bultdozer. 36 Table 5: InV elltc7ra c7l' E,L:oLt & EL colt l202M Arcl aeolugical Sites. S1ljP# T1'PE FUNCTION AGE 10011 Platf6ml Ag. Clearing Pre -Contact 10012, Platform & waII Burial Prehistoric 10013 Enclosure & Lava Tube Iiabitiltinit Pre-Ccmtact 1001 5 Bulldozer Road Transportation Modern 1.0017 Platform C'attic ft.inip Hititoric 10018 Lnulosure A"ricultural Historic 10019 6 Rock Mounds Arg. Clearing Itislordc 14020 Bedrock Outcrop Geological Feature Natural 14031 Enclosure Wall Agriculture Historic 14033 Planting, Complex Cotfee Ag Historic 11034 Bedrock Lklterop Cwolvuic.11 Fcatw-e Nawra[ 10049 TQrracc.`6 A rii:ulture Historic 10067 Terraces Habitation Prehistoric 10068 Enclosure Habitation Prcbi toric 10069 lw odifted B1ut'VPlat.form Habitation Hi:"toric 14070 U-Sliape Enclosure AL_t'icultiire I Iistoric 14071 Platform Ilabitation Prchistoric 14472 Mc lilted Bluff Ag, Cly*aring Pre -Contact 10073 Platforivs Ranching/ka. Historic 14074 Enclosure Coffee Work Shed Historic: 10075 E17c:IDLlr4 Pig Pct1 I11sturfc a() 92 Railroad Berm T rii[I.'Porta Iit) 1i 11I"'Wric IF -1 1'e€ro 1vp1i Markel, 1'i'cloi�tuti� 31 151 EnClOSUre Coffee Work Shed I IIs[oi.IC 31.182 luck Walls Ranching & Agri Historic * Site hummers are preceded by the prefix 50-10-37-, 37 CULTURAL INFORMANT 1NTFRVIEWS Consultation WaS SQllght from Jordan Kea Calpito, SHPT) Burial. Sites Specialist; Karnakana Ferreira, DHA Compliance Officer, Nicole Lui, cultural descendant, Sesta Naleilnailc, State Historic Preservation ]division (SHPD) Hawaii Island Archaeologist, Kek-oa Nerara, Kona Hawaiian Civic Club President-, Slane Nelson, OHA West Hawaii Representative, and J, Curtis Tyler III, cultural descendant (Table 4). Consultation was also conducted via telephone with Gregg Kashiwa who served as project property manager for parcels 01.6 and 017 in the early 19S[ls. Table 4; Individit-als Rc powws to CIA Consultation RccJuest. Name AtTili:ation Responded Has Knowledge Cultural Practices _10i'd ll KL<< C'alpito SHPT] Burial ';llCi SPWAIi;l No - - f'i ifll.11 nna l'eneira !)HA Conil)]ia ce Offii ei No - - �ll`i'y�"! fh ltill9 tiz1 Forinoi l�r[71 'E't4` ti311 f;� .f' Ytiti Yes No Nicloe Llll Oiltur,il D,:scccrldani Y''� YCS No SeaIl Naleiniall4 51111D Aachaculcgi"t No - - Kekea'a Nazara Kona Hawaiian CIVIL: Club Yes Some No Shane Nelson OHA Nest Hawaii Rep. No - - J. Curtis Tvlcr III Cultural Dcsccnd Yes Yes I No GREGG I{ASHIWA CONSULTATION Gregg Kashiwa was intervie\ped by phone on April 19, 2016. Mr, Kashiwa was the Project property manager fur parcels 016 and 017 in the early 1980s and was present during AIS work documented in the Hammatt et al, (1992). He is originally from Oahu but lived in Kona for several decades. Mr. Kashiwa remembered that the 5 -acre portion of Parcel 017 ill the southeast portion of the project area was excluded from the original AIS because the property owners were planning to give the five acres to a group to use as an agricultural preserve. The Live acres and the property below (tri the West) had alfcady been bulldozed for agricultural use. Mr_ Kashiwa knew that thcre ky,crc ralich wall,%and IIisLoric era agricultural feattlres on the project area, bia did not know how they were used, as they were no longer in use during his time in Kona.. He also remembered the old railroad bed and berm and that there was a small railroad stop along the track just south of the project area. 38 SUMMARY The "level of effort undertaken" to identi fv potential effect by a project to cultural resourecs, places or beliefs (OEQC 1997).has not been officially defined and is left up to the investigator. A good faith effort can mean contacting agencies by letter, interviewing people who may be affected by the project or who know its history, research identifying sensitive areas and previous land use, holding meetings in which the public is invited to testify, notifyine! rhe cominuntty through the media, and other appropriate strategies biased on the typc of ri,o,iocr being proposed and its impact potential. 1n the case of the present parcel, consultation was sought from Jordan Kea Calpito, 5Hl'D Burial Sites Specialist; Kaanakana Ferreira, OHA Compliance Officer; Nicole L.ui, cultural descendant, Seats Naleimaile, State Historic Preservation Division (SRPD) Hawaii Island Archaeologist; Kekoa Nezara, Kona Hawaiian Civic Club President; Shane Nelson, OHA West Haivai`i Representative, and J, Curtis Trier 111, cultural descendant Consultation was also conducted via telephone with Gregg Kashiwaa who served as prcyjc t property manager for parcels 016 and 017 in the early 1980s. Public notices (see Appendix A) were placed in the December 2019 issue of the Office of Havaiiian Affairs (ORA) lea Wai Ola Newspaper. Public notices were also published in the Honolulu Star -Advertiser, and the West Hawai `i Today on November 17th, 20"' and ? 11". Historical and cultural source maieri:als were extensively used and can he found listed in the References Cited portion of the repast. Such scholars as I`i, Kamakau, Chinen, Ksrne`eleihiwa, Fornander, Kuykendall, belly, Handy and Handy, Puku`i and Elbert, Thrum, and Cordy have contributed, and continue to contribute to our knowledge and understanding of Hawal'i, past and present. The works of these and other authors were consulted and .incorporated in the report where appropriate. Land use document research was supplied by (110 Waihona Aina 2007 Data base. 39 CIA INQUIRY RESPONSE As suggested in the "Guidelines for Accessing Cultural. Impacts" (OFQC 1997), CiAs incorporating personal interviews should include ethnographic anti ural history twrview procedures, circumstances attending the interviews, as well as the results of this consultatiOn. It is also pen»issible to inciucte or�fyani/.diens 66th individuals familiar with cultural practices and features associated with the project dMI. As stated above, consultation was sought from the Off -ice of Hawaiian Affairs, the. SHPD Burial Sites Branch, the SHPD Archaeolo,-y Branch, families associated. with Kaloa 5`1' Ahupua'a, and long-time Kona residents. There were no responses to the public notices published in the OHA Ka Wai 01a, West liawai`i Today 01- the H011)Eulu Star-Advcrtiscr newspapers, J. Curtis Tyler Ill, Nicole Lui and Greg Kashi a dict provide information concerning lands of H€1ual0a 1" Ahupua`a. Therewere no past or ongoing cultural prdefices identified with lands of the current project area. An analysis of the potential effect of the proposed construction of residences on cultural resources, practices or heliel5, its potential to isolate cultural resources, practices or beliefs from their setting, and the potential of (lie project to introduce elements which may alter the scUing in which cultural practices take place is a requirement of the OEQC (No. 10, 1997). Based on historical research and responses from the above listed contacts, it is reasonable to conclude that, there will be no traditional cultural practices affected and there will be no direct adverse effect upon cultural practices or beliefs in the broader project area region. 40 CULTURAL ASSESlSMEMNT Based on the results of an Archaeological Assessment of the project area. the results of previous archaeological stadies, as well as organizational response, individual cultural inforn-tant responses, and archival research, it is reasonable to conclude that. pursuant to Act 50, the exercise of native Hawaiian rights, or any ethnic group, related to gathering, access or other customary activities will not be affected by development activities on this parcel, The proposed project is not a location for past or ongoing cult.rrral practices. The proposed undertaking will not produc,c adverse effects to ariv ria(ivc Hawaiian cultural practices witliiti the proNct area or in the broader region. 41 Aki, H. REFERENCES CITED 1952 Flap ofKailua Section, North Kana:,, Hawai`i, Land Titles, Survey and Map by J.S. Emerson. Havwai'i Territory Survey Map, Registered I4+1,ap No. 1280. Alexander, J, 1855 Map of Hnlualoa 1 & 2, Kona Hawaii. Hawaii Territory Survey Map. Registcred Map No. 1450. Athens, J., T. Reith, and T. Dye 2014 A paleoenvironmental and archaeological model -leased age estimate for the colonization of Hawaii. American Antiyrrily, 79(4);144-55. Bergin, Dr. B. 2004 Lo"val to the Land -The Legc�ndap-t' Parker ranch, 750-1 0. Lrniversity ofHawti`i Press. HonolUlll. Barrera, W. Jr. 1971 r ca Kcanhou, North lona, Hawa . Bishop 1 frr.�a rrrrt D perr 11rre rrrcrl Repcar t Sc r Fcs 71-1 t). Subrxaitled to l(amchameha. Development Corporation. B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. 1995 .Nor (h Kona, Hawaii Island.- .4rchaeoiogical Reconnaissance raf Seven Par -cels. Prepared for County of Hawaii Planning Department_ Buxtchard, Cl. C. 1995 Population and Land -use on the K aidio r Coast, the ;tlorrkca Leinds Irrventoi)� .Survey}, Ketarhou, I oreh R'oract. Hcnval `i Alcmd. the :•` "arrcative, pnrl 1. Subrnitled to Belt, Collins and Associates and Kamehanielia 111VO-, ient Corporation. I.AR fL Honolulu. Calis, 1„ M1 T, Carson, M. Dega and R,L, Spear 2004 Data Recraven, ar the Phase I and 11 Portions of the Kah akcal Development Project .4r•eca T (3) 7-7-2()••1. SCS Report 2.09-1. Preparcd for Stanford Carr Development, LLC. SCS, Honolukl. Deport on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Carlson, A.K., and P.H. Rosendahi 1990 14rebaeologkwl Inventor'v �Survev, Pualana Development - Phase 11, Larrcis ofParuprraca i" earrd 2"`r, Noa•th Bona Drstr•ict; Lskaad raf l-lan}aii. PHRI, Inc. report pn parcd for Pualani Development Company, Rcport on file at the SHPD Library. Kapolm_. 42 Chinen, J.J. 1961 Original Lcmd Titles it? Hwvai'i. Clark, M., and R. Rcclatman 2006 ��� _ tr 1rcr crlogieallrrvcrrtor Srrnr'v o f T1�'li. -T-fi-00-1:0 3, H65huth..v 1-' Ahnprra'a, North Kona L7ivrricl. 1slerrrd<�f rrircri'i. Reclitman Consulting Report RC -0360 prepared for Mr, Phil Tinguely, H61ualoa 't'''illage Partners, LLC;, Kailva-Kana, Hawa.i`i. Conolly III, R.D.. and 1. Curtness 1979 Reconnaissance Surve-v at the Komohona Kai Subdivion ("Unit 1) Sde (7_ll�:.;-F-0-1 3:31). Report prepared by Science Applications Inc., Honolukl I'Or G.C:. Developmeni Co., Inc. report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolci. Cordy, R. 1991 A Studi, of Pr-ehLvaric Social Change: The Developrrrem ol'Complex .Socieriee in the H(waflan Wands. Academic Press, New York. 1995 .Sc}lrfemenr Parir},w.,. Department of Land and Natural Resources, State 1 -1i -,toric Preservation Division, Honolulu, 2400 Exalted Sits the Chr'el: Mutual Publishing. Honolulu. Daws, G. 1968 Shoal of Time: A History of the Hawaiian Island. Macmillan, New York. Hestlets, M., and R. Rechtman 2004 Archaeological hirewor-t Su)-ve-v of a Grunt Incr•emem RoodRernnarrt Propegv (T K:3 -7-6r-08:005 por.), H6harrh-,a 1-2 Ahulvia'a, North Kona Districr, Idandelf' Henet i'i. Rechtman Consulting Report RC -0244 prepared for Curt A. Cottrell, Na Ala Hele Program Manager, Hoticlulu, Hawaii and Ranson Perez de Ayala, Kla`a1111i Partnership, FlonohiILL, Iiwvai`i. Dircks, A., L. Zcnobi. and R. Rcclunian []eye, T. 2013 Archueologicul Iravcxr or'v Sur ve'v q0he ,F'owjm),w� i Miv.r.w Farm ,tiidulivision (?'i.'17K.Y.-3-7-6-001: 003, fatty, rand of ]), 1161 drw 1-2 ,altar{r+r&ct, :Vorlh Koiia District, Island fHast•-aO. Rechtman Consulting Report RC -0856 prepared for Edward Rapoza, Kailua-Kana. 2011 A model -based age estimate for Polynesian colonization of Hawai°i. ArchaeoloKt' in ()ceania, 46:130-38. 43 Ellis. W. 1963 }Var°rative o/'a Torrr° rrf fIi7VV0ii, ar° Orrahvhee. Advertiser Publishing, Honolulu, Escotl, G. 2013 lr c lrueralrrt,rc�rl frairerttor e' .5�rr r cit' fca{�crrt frrr the Pr fli)Q.s'if . TcT Frr1E 1 talc}enrrrrrrrfrric't�itutr.� Tv�, •car• (ff,9 d�•' ���} j �S°i1� 1_r��r1�c� fry h!ctlrrc�}cam 1•`r A:�rrp�r�r `rt, Alorlh Kotra District, Haufai 7 f. lcalxf fiau,eri y [TWK; (3) 7-6-024,-032]. SCS Report # 1340-2 prepared for Ace Fnvironmental. Las Vegas. Escott, G., and S. Es tt 2018 Archaeological Inventor); Srtrivv Relvrrt.for 5.0 Acres Lrxated it) H6111aloa }vr Alruptra'a, Norah Kona District, lfcnvai 'i Island, Hovai 'i [TI K.— (3)7-6-021:017 Por.]. Prepared for East rest Really. SCS Report 1571, Honolulu. 2020 Ar c�huc�ulcrgicitf Itrttcxrrtort- Srrr7. Rcr+tcar 7.11 Acmes Lcx�trted rrr Ilolrrufvcr 1st Ahrupua'a, North KonaDis-trjet, }Yctwai'lly°land,, Hcmwl'i [TMK: (3)7-6-021:016- 019]. Prepared ror Kona Three, LLC. SCS Report 2330, Honolulu. Escott, G. and N. Mello ESRI 2019a Beeriai Sire ('rrrrrixrucnr f)l-(j Buried Treatment Plan jcrr Brrr-ial Sile #50-10-57- 30593 LocattJ in IfahiaW 1`' Ahrelma'a. North Kona District, fltrivai i Islmrc. Hcnvai'i JEVI : (3)7-6-021:017]. Prcl arcd for Kona Three, LLC, SCS Report 2.137, Honol.11lu. 2019b An Archaeological Pr&%ver -va rif m Plan for Site #5f1-10-57-3#'1592 Located in f1'uluafoa I `+ _ lhularea 'a, North lutea District, Hawai 'i Islinkl, Hawai `i [71M.' : (3)7-6-021:016-019]. Prepared for Kona Three, LLC. SCS Report 2137, Honolulu. 2013 Arc GIS Explorer, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Ca, Fager, M., and D. Graves 1993 Archaeological lr3ventorY .Sury ,;ti , Uoluafi ra 3r•d Devc1ol.i rrew Parcel, Land qj' Holualekr 3"1, North Kona Divr•rct, h4and of llcn raO (MK:3- 7- 7-04.- 35,1. P H R I Deport 1231-073092 prepared for Dillingharn Partners. Ooogle Earth 2013 Google. Earth lrrrager�,. Goole Earth. Mountain View, Ca. 44 Graves, D.K., and S.Y. Goodfellow 1993 The Clcar•dens gl*Kona a4evisitecl.• Pu alcmr Residential Conirraaraiii v Pha. e /I- Archaeological 1Arc:°haeol€ g coal Dacca Rcc oveii7, Lcaaafls 01 UOP1racr 1" amt "" 'Vor th Kona District, fslca►ad oJ`Hca► -ah (T?I-fK,-3-7-5-17 yior.28, 29). Fl I R1, I ire. report prepared For Pualani Estates, Inc. Report an File at the SHPD Library, Kapolei, Llan, T. L.. S. L. Collins, S. D. Clark, and A. Garland 1986 r loi—,, Katt a Ho `pilo_- Ke'opaar, Kona, HcxrvoO. Chapter VI[. Artifacts and Ma.Puports from the Keopu Burial Site. Bishop Muceur7f Departmental Report Series 86-1. Submitted to Department of Transportation, Horiolulti. Handy, E.S. 1940 The Hawaiian Planter, Volvine 1. B.P. Bishop Mu.scum bulletin 161. B.P. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Harz matt, H.H. 1979a A r'c'laf ieriingrccrl .�rrt't,ej, q f a 2l Acre Parcel as Hn1aea1ex7fllaaa jmo `ca, Hou'aii, Report prepared by the Archaeological Research Center i Iak aii, Inc. Report on file at the SHPD Library, KapoleL 1979b Archaeofogiccal,4Srr}•vq nla 22 Acre Jona Halvai "r Islami, Report prepared brht Archaeological Research Ccntcr Hawaii. Inc. for Kalani Sunset Corporation. Deport on Isle at the SHVID Library. Kapolei. 1979c Archaeological S arvey' car ciExcavation ai the Kai ,5abdivisioa Hohaaloc , Kona, Hctwai 'i Aland. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. Manuscript. Prepared for G.C. De\,clopment Co., Inc. 1980 Archaeological Sur vev egad E'xc'mulion at the Pr•rpr used Komohcan a Kai k�arl3 Ifvisiov I- F)heulova, Kona, Havv ai "i Nam). Report prepared by the Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. for G.C. Development Company. Inc, Rcpt�rt on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Hammat, H.H., D. Borthwick, and D. Shideler 1986 Archaeological Surve'v orad E:rc•cwarionx carr a 20 -Acre Parcel H&hral"aa, Kang, Hcnrxai'i Island. Report prepared by Cultural Surveys Hawaii for Mary[ Investments, Inc. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Hammatt, H. H., and S. D. Clark 1980 Arclatrerairkgieal Tcsih; WRI Salevr ,e Excavations ofa 155 Acre (C;h7rer•j Parcel in ciahiri)rrcr'caf'u arsel oe' l.ir"crli,ca, ividKapalii alaea, Kona Hfrtf'caf'i Island ARC"il Report 14-152 1[l. Sublall ed to Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. 45 Han matt, H.H., and W'.H. Folk 1980 Ar°c°1ruc�ofnTic'c� Srrr°� cy, Phase° Pcrr taorrs a f 1Cccrulirrri-sorra }2esnr t, ICearifrnrr arrrcl Kalndu'u, Kona, Hawaii Island} ARCH Report 14-177 11.1, Submitted to Krunchameha Investment Corporation. 1981 Arc'haxcxoiogical .S'urwv of a 20 Acre Parc.1111. h511jalou, Kona, Hcnva `i I.shuid. Deport prepared by the Ar€;haetalogicaI Rcscareh CcnLer I Iawraii. Inc. for KaIani Sunset Corporation. Report on fileat the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Hani matt, H.H., W.H. Folk, and D.W. Shideter 1992 Arc haecrlo icu'1 Survev Tesring orad Exc:�at-arivn of a 174 -Acre Paar�eel, .Holualou, A`orlh Kona, Hawai'i. Report prepared by Cultural Surveys Hawaii For the Gamlon Corporation. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. 2007 Letter Report Documenting ArchaeciogicalSt eiv Conducted, Finds, and Their Tr•eeinvent at a Proposed Alulri-Fanfily Resideniiarl Development, Hohealoa Alnipua'a, North Kona, Hawai 'l, TMK: (3) ? -6-021: 016 &r.}. Fteptart prepared by Cultural Surveys 1250 Oceanside Partners, LLC. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei Han3matt, H, H., and V. W. Meeker 1979 Archaeological acavatiorrs eirrd Heiarr Stabilization at Kaholrr 'rr. Koeta Hawaii Island. ARCH Report 14-172(11). Submitted to Gerald Park, Urban Plattner, Haun, A. E., and D. Henry '1000 Archaeological lnivrrdnr-y Sur-t.,e'v T K., T-7-04:56, H6hia7lr .3, Noah Kona, Island o�{'Hcrai.'cri `i. Hawn 8& Associates report prepared for Mr. Sidney Fuke, Hilo, Hawaii. Report on file attire SHPD Library, Kapolei_ 1001 Dalru Rctr overy Site 141.30 T"K.- (3) 7 -5 -17. -Por. 1. Prepared for Inaba En6necrin€ - [ laun & Associates, Kea`au. Report on file at the SHPD [..il}rary, Kapolci, Haun, A. E., J. D. Henry, J. A. Jimenez, M. A. Kirkendall, K. Maly, and T. R. VlWolforth 1998 Alii Hig;nva i, ,PhaseclMitigatiota Pi•ograna Pita ve I - Arclraeologicatl lnleta.sii,e Sut-ver' Strrrxm ar .-, >vo/. 1. PHM Report 1320-052798. Submitted to County of Hawaii. PHRL Hila. Hommon, R.1. 1996 Social Evoiution ire Ancient Hawaii. In lslnrrcl 'if)eietits: _4r-r-Jveaeolagice7I Approaches to Evohdion and Trorrsffarrnation, edited by P.V. Kirch, pp. 55-88. University Press, Cambridge, 46 Kahn, J., Rieth, P. Kirch, J. Athens, and G. Mlurakami 2014 Re -dating of the Kuli`ou'ou rockshelter, Oahu, Hawaii: Location of the first radiocarbon date from the pacific Islands. Journal of the Pol nesian Sac: fete, 123(t).67-90, Kame`eleihiwa, L 1992 Native Land and f nreign Desires. Pehea La E Parra Ar f Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu, Kelly, M. 1983 AVa ala o Kortrr: G'-irderis of Kotia. Rept. of Anthropology Report Series 83-2. Bishop Museum. Honolulu. Kirch, P.V. 1985 l-'e(ahered God, cjnd F'islrJrooks: An Introduction ro Hmvcdian Archaeology arae Prehistai-v. University of Ilawaii Press, Honolulu 2[} I I When did the Polynesians settle Hawaii? A re -view of 150 years of scholarly inquiry and a tentative answer. Hawaiian Archaeaiagv, 12:3-26. Kirch, P.V, and M. McCoy 241417 Reconfiguring the Hawaiian Cultural Sequence: Results of re -dating the Halawa dune site (MO -A 1-3), Molokai Island. Journal of the PuJYnesian Soeieq,, 1.16:385-406. Kirch, P.V. and M. Sahlins 1992 Ana+r utu. Vol. 1 and 2. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Kuykendall, R. S. 1938 The Hawaiian Kingdom. Vol. I. University of Hawaii Press. lionolulu. Landrum, J,, A.F. Haen, P.H. Rosendahl, and K. Ddirnont 19901 Archaeolr}gkari lrax'c?x# e 's' .�v)) v�] ed)id Tc�si Excavations Kahaka Development Pr�o�reci t Area. PHRI Rc1)()i1 _57 -070 t 85. Prepared for Nilson Okarnoto & Associates. PHRI, Hila. Report on tilc at the SHPD Library. Kapolet. Maly, K 1993 Kado Hwonhfa Prr uwai No Ka -Milo. The Heart Story Sian' gl'Ka-Miki. Published in Hawaiian, in the newspaper "Ka H5kfi o Ha�rai'1(Hilo) January 8, 1914 through December 6, 1917. Translated by Kepa Maly for Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. 1996 Historical Documentary Research. In Archaeological hiventort, Survey Proj)osed Hcrrry Street Extension Racal Corridor. by WUlzen, W., T.R. Wolfarth, and LJ. Franklin. pp. 9-19. PR.H[ Repast 1465-092696. Prepared for Maryl Development, Kailua-Kona. PHRI_ Hila. 47 Maly, K. and 0. Maly 2001 He Wirlai �4o'olelo No Nd Airrtr, A e h`er Ala Hayle 1 HLIti la, _rldai Keaarhoti A I Keakthekim, Ala Kona, He-nvcai `i (A Himwiccal 0i,er-i4ew r�, f the Lairch. And Y),�ail.s� Tt-aveled, I eiween Ke aaahou caraallti'c alakekii a, Komi. Hcnr ai `i. Kuno Pcn o and Dissociates report prepared for Na ;ala Ilele Program Manager (11awai`i Island), Stale Division of Forestry and N ildlifc. l lilo- 2002 He W'tahi Xfo `olela No ,Kir kn a A Me NO `Ohutya 0 W aiki 'i Ma Wcarikr loo (K:akaaaa U TI'aimea, ,Kohalca). A Me Ked'' 4iarca'Mauna; A Collection ql'Tradifions and Himorival Aceoanns rrf d?r f.c ink and carnilies q( W aiki `i at Waikvlrxar alVcxhnea Re -i oa i, �owh iC ohala). and rfae A 4(ntratain Landv, Island of Haw ai 'i ff,WK Over-va'€ w ,Sheer b-7-61). KwnLt Pont Associates. Hilo. Maly, K., and P.H. Rosendahl 2006 Phase III Aa -ch aeologiccal Site Preserntraiion Plant, Pualani Reside n ial Comaa units, .+41i<tagadon Pr•ograrra, Lands gfParcapawca I'" and?`{ North Kona District, Iticin,101, #�`mr ai`i Ilr lit":3-7-5-P7 ?fit, ?4j. T'fTRi. Inc. report prepared for 5tillrrl� r 1I�,r77es Report on fila at the SI1PD Library, Kapolei. McCoy, M. 2005 The development of the Kalaupapa Feld system, Koloka`i Island, Hawaii. Jtrrracrl v"the Polxrrreslcrrr Soc rets , 116:339-59. 2007 Revised late Holocene culture history for Molokai Island_ Hawaii. Rcadioc ara-hon, 49(3):1273-1322. Menzies, A. 1920 Flenrai'i Xei 128 Ye ars Ago. Edited by W.F. Wilson. New F retdorn Press. Honolulti. Mulronne , M. S. Bicklcr. M. Allen. and T. l.adcloged ')Ol l High-precislon dating of colotil/.ation and settlement in East Polynesia. Proceedings gf'the.-Vafional Acvde itry of',Sciences, 108:E192 -E 194. National Geographic, Topa! 2003 Se amlcc,vs t:'SGS Topographic 1lftcaps on CD -ROU, Htnvai `i. National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Washington, D.C. Nelson, D., L. Bulgrin, and R. Rechtman 2005 AFa At-chat-ological lnierrtoi-r} Sar? -trey of TMK. 3-7-6-013:008, Holrrctioa 1s•t cl. 2t?d Akpara'a. North Kona Districe, Island nfH awcai `i. Rechunan Consulting Report RC -€}2.51. Prepared for Nearon Enterprises, LLC, Danville, California. (Revised 2006). 48 Newman, T. S. 1970 Hav arran Fishing and Farming on the island r?f I-1#7tit vii A.D. 1778. Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu. Pukui, M.K., S. Elbert and E. Mookini 1974 Place Names cif Hawaii, University of Hawaii Press_ I lonolulu. Reehtmain, R.B. 006 Air Ai-c,hac-t)logicezllnvt}ntori, Siine.v of`TMK.3-7-1)1.3:017, Halrraloa 1-2 Alrrrprrar `ca, )Vorth Kos t r Districi.15larrd rrf"Hcawai 'i, Report Prepared by Rechtman Consulting, LLC for Geometrician Associates, LLC. Deport on rile at the S14PD Library, Kapolei. Rieth, Timothy M., Terry L. Hunt. Carl Lipo, and Janet M. Wilmshursi 2011 The 13th Century Polynesian Colonization ofHawai`i island. Journal cif' Archaeological Scieuce 3&2740-2749. Rosendahl, M. 1998 �rclrcreriingiccrl Rccanrraisscxrlce Sie�� e7°. 1lolualncr is°d Develapmc�►�t }'err cel. Land of Whiaioa 3`tf Narth Komi. hdand(?f Nasi-& `i (7lt.fK- 3-7-04: 33 5}. PH RI. Report 400-1272S7 prepared for D-111ingharti Tmst, Report on file at the :SHM Library, Kapolei. Rosendahl, P. 1978 Archaeological Suive'v of ihc° U1 ii L eivlop))rurri Site (T'+1�K 3- 7-6-14: ara(l.3-'-7-114:22, 23,27,47) IK.railuci-k)j;ca I.rtcatrd of l-luie-rri'f. PHRI Report 5.-122078. Prepared for Cray, Rhee and Associates. 1989 Archaeological FieldIn.,q)ecrion, Koinrtlriwa Kai Vzdxhi7h ian Parcels, Land of N» Malo a I`5° and 2" � North %ono, }.Slurred g1'h'atva0 (7UK.3-7-6-22:49.N4). PFIRI Letter Report 44-121181 preparod for Clyde Coatney. On file at the SH PD Library, Kapold, Sato- H.. W. Ikeda. R Paeth, R Smythe, and M. Takehiro Jr. 1973 Scute of Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture Sail Conservation Service. Washington D.C. Schilt, R- 1984 Stibsisteiice €arid C orrjlici iii Korta, Hmie-ij'i Air Archaeolvgical.�rtrclt- Qf (he Knakini Highw av Realignazerrl Corridor, Department ol'Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museurn, Honolulu. Report prepared for the Hawaii Department of Transportation. On file at the SIIPD Library. Kapolei. 49 Sinoto, A. 1979 Archaeological Reconnaissance Scrr ve'v cif Six Acres in the Ahulma `a of Holualoa 1 and2, Norrh Kuria, Ha+i'ai'i. Department of Anthropology. B.P. bishop MvaSeum, 11011011110. Pr€parcd tier Brehm Construction Company. Sochren, L 1979a Letter Report: Parcels 10, 12, and 1.3 of TMK. 7-6-14, h? Hdhialua, North Kona. Prepared for Mr. Hiroshi Masan}oto. 1.979b Lener Report; TAX: 7-6-15:15, 1,15 taloa. dllorth Kona. Prepared for Zuzalt and Associates. 1980a Letter Report. -Archaeological and Hisior{ical Features on the Parcel ldentrflcd b9, Tai- Atop Iter. 7-6- 21:14, Situared at H51uaAc a ?, Norlh Konya, Hawaii. Prepared for Golden Triangle Real Estate. 1980b Letter Report: Archaeological acrd Historical Featuras on the Parcels Jd€nt}fled v Tax ,Trp Keyv 7-6-14:21J at H()lr aJort 2, mid 7-7-04;22,,27,47 of H61ualoa 3, North Kona, ffawvai'i. Prepared lair BA and M Corp. Starr Environmental 2416 botanical and Faunal Surveys in the State ofHawai°i_ Makawao. www.starrcnvirortrnental.com. Tainter, J. A. 1973 The Social Correlates of Mortuary Patterning at Kaloko,' North Kana, Hawaii. Arehaeofo > and PhYsic-al Anthropology in Ocean 8( 1):1-11. Torncanari-Tuggle, M. J. 1990 fly'c°rrac,r w eal'r•cXx' rxl'1 cxx'c�lralrrr}e},rf Parcel 26 of the K-canhoio J?Csori' Ahrrprrcr "a ofkahalar `rr, ,r o'r1h Kona. Island rrf lfcr iii 'r. Prepared for Belt Collins and Associate's. international Archac;ological Rcsearch lnstitrrle, Inc. Honolulu. U.S. Geological Survey 1928 15-,kfinute Series TOpogr•crph c llih; trircl+ crrrs�rlc r1-hqj. LJ SCIS Vi'i nl. Washington, DLA. URL: hll�:llgefruanit'.w.r�.t�.�'.��rb".1.+1�,'Ir�irFrrrFtll�.�:. Vancouver, G. 1467 A �gvage ofDisetwer-i, to the .North Pacrfl'c Ocean, 4W?d _,trrlrrrrd rf c li'Or'!cl_ Robinson and Edwards. London. 1984 A V verge nj 'Drscovery to the Orth Pacific Ocean, and Around the World. Robinson and Edwards. London - 50 Waihona `Aina 2014 MAhele online database. wwv,-.waihona.r- ern. Walker, A.T., and P.H. Rns-enclahi 19981r°c ir�rc calr7;iccrd ft'i c t,rr�rc�r,M.crrac'e� Srar�°c�7', P�rala�ri Sulydit i.4inn. Lrraci's of'Pa►al�r�cxa 1'a U10 ,,", .Vm-ih Kc:m) D- barict. PTTRT, Inc. report prepared for Putilant Det•clopl-nent t_.f}]iiii,i17y ]Report on file at the S11PD Library, Kapolei. Wilkes, C. 1845 Yfira a ii'v a ,'tOhc{ Uniled Stutes Exploring a�;ri�et if on During the Yeas 1938-1842. Vols. 1-5 crud tfdas. Leu & Blanchard Ph dadelphlar 1970 N a'rrative of fire United States Exploring E:rpeditfon Daring the Year's 1938-1842. Vols. 1-5 undAllas. Lea & Blanchard Phihidt,:,1j)hia. Wilmhurst. J., T. Hunt, C. Lipo, and A. Anderson 201[a High -precision radiocarbon. Cltbling allows recent and rapid colonilatiOn of East Polynesia. Proceedirt►.s rj`fdrt i�xiiifitC�d Ac'crcicf��t'r�f .tir'asle"�'-w. 1011.1815-24. 2011. b Reply to Mulrooney et al. � Accepting lager precision radiocarbon dates results in longer colonization chronologies for East Polynesia. Proceedings gf'the iVVati)ncil Acudein-i, of'Sc�ienc,e.�. W&E195. Wolfe, E. V., and J. Morris 1994 Geological Map of the island of Hawaii. U.S-GS. Miscellaneous Investigations Series. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Wolforth, T., J. Henry, and R. Rechiman 2000 Ar'c°aeolgrc'cr1 {rrrc�,rtr�r w tiaras} ref J�e�a I'arc'c1s a'r7 {{{lrcrdrxr ?rtcl irra 1 Jrd tVr�r'11a Kates District. I.sdrane1 of `{bra wai `i. PHRI Report 1941-080999 prepared for Mr. Ralph Berczai7. Report an file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. 51 APPENDIX. A. PUBLIC NOTICES AND AFFIDAVITS A-1 HOL LIALOA 1nfwman,on mquemed by Scienhfic (,cjnqA. lant Scmlces, Inc- of lam and ongoing cultural pssctitces on 76. xses of Und in 1461ugm 1st .Ahupw'a. ooh Kana L]esmci. Island of Hawzd'i. I'.MK-. 01 1 7-6-021IH 6, Ill 7.1}ilk and €}19_ Please resp%-iw �tithtn V days to Gletut vaixsa.com. December 2019 lea Wai ON Public Notice. -2 1%[Itk:Y•R I'11A(0 ce¢Tuau_P�IYH"T.w�ES�kLErlO7tCC- MfFaf-`CIC tAL.Lx^CtNAR YfATE OF HAWAII 1 C,`Iy sad CGtmT ofIllneials Coa NO, NOV-111m# Poes; t Notay Noma: CCIl1 1E C �en,►�+raa - m1.Y�icW{t Iz�ult Oft. O�aaof� �I1n"_.________ •'` ��,ti � '�•�r�a . NUTAkf hf;V 2 1 2013 One s' •�•4i�� x `ijOUF4AYy:uybllsf'�oisde gk.YIi1m.f:>t�MA�iIY C1,44 PU IK'ffinlri lar ds:lkih"IfTtt pllti'EIn ,11 r 7.1+".ubac. L'!UGWJCe:jbeffa WellH"4, 1CKM$y, %j110,0, L1':r111. Y1""! ❑"t UN41 rs%.aplPM E' ci.YOP&P %O Ph" GNIWWww"LOW SW .d i'.. 1Na., aCY: 1':.t L11 Al hl:.' rmi I_ 1:L IWO 18".W FLIK&cd q1 ft 141A Werk t rIt'i Yin '1110rank®fiID" r7 cepa }t, "real T1,4W je.twwt I r, IMIft 0A we't I=ender Imey C, !wp-nemt 4 I;nkE arc And t4d 1aPW9 p r" 91MM ti W r anj- V Xy :AtCr ftd r ELT 4k"e ctd'CC r -t -n 00 L S ai.ectw!$ 4xr+w Yvn.rl m, r-I,x•.,vE-YYr.,e. -+.'4n� 1", rel W617111W h. f711". )q '-+ san w,:slalca,c_ la,l.tZ.... ;>k4 �it�, Ad A J%171i'J4( :�,' " 440TFYRY tin 911-�* - CIFa" I wSF' MO. November 2019 I Innolulu Star -Advertiser Public Notice. -3' 4111�tA1, ulYxtt �II[S9t1prr11pnR� I'&—IIM Ym latw I) Stm'wA1: I s miWit 6LMAa; he a!:+Mru x�9Lut,a.�nlr71 Kms Oalimt 1 ory rl Imaj. Tm. OF 3•4Wi %J. V;7,4 $A ird 011 v r anal 10 4n •m 44rr x::41 a Pam) IIItojl 1, It 11jr. t16% i. � I 111 PAN ri or ?t:uj.rt:,% r lqjN th 'NJ % I I F Ik cjP 7rTr ^VILMIqM, NAN J t4 KQ�-A It! Ujtl't 10 F FrAWA i r 1,14Y 14 1 'ads ty of 11,.J46 D,or, Date, NOV 21120 Pages: I Notwy Ulf 001c. 006cripton: `F S 0'14 PL I-qj- ar, mnTARY NO 2 12019 ha WL W2" Z' Few IL L11C.Ift, JjR.4rMr1 I LLI IW M PH xwru % i.! fim il.. INC 11-MOLIL SL4 ". , - I , I IM -4 yr Mid'&-IcL —) T! M1' -L on I h 9, 1 - arde 1k I I I inj 0 frw 0A. Ha1121' I -1'V-LhC-H6,r. J 0 Lnl"!I'm NV05114mr4r way 3 (irmsvr-, 1i 1?, 114J0. 1112qA0f9 CC 15f l'utira-ion.-k- - 0 ti rM On. Arcs, Ld Ff,4'1l is twl 4L R"I" r C1 In any ony N k jjk mtrM a, kleg InEft, 6k tmrls 'w" ""wnw '1k, ;kt A F) IC of thft F.14f jjdrn, MY roml"03mffi- GXP;TCl JA 06 W4 ARY Aa 09 PX11W4041r Pt In, IC I Nr - L% November 2019 West Hawaii Today Public Notice. A-4 IC9F PIC, -'1k Fit, I at I'm 4, 5 C I wnw) F171Y tZ.A. LI.., A-5 APPENDIX 5: Archaeological Inventory Survey Reports SCS Nujecl Numbn 1873-2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY SURVEY REPORT T FOR -54.0 ,ACRES LOCATED IN HOLUALOA 1' AHUPUA"A, NORTH KONA DISTRICT, HAWAI'l ISLAND, HAWAPI ITMK: (3) 7-6-021:017 POR.1 Prepared By: Glenn G. Escott, M.A. Suzan Escott, B.A. 2018 FINAL Prepared for: East West Realty 700 Bishop St, Stiac 1000 Honolulu, H 1 968 t 3 -4 t 12 1347 3 47 Kapj'o I am i i Rmilcvw-d. Sidle 409 Ho oo I Wti, H1 X76$14 Ha%i ai'i Island Oifim P0 -Box 155 Kea-aaL HI 96749 Ai3STRACT At the request of'property € wncr Kona Three, LLC, Scientific Consultant. Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted an archaeological Inventory sunny (SIS) of a 5.D -acre portion of lard TM K: (3)-7-6- 021:01 7 ;3)-7-6- il21:(f17 located in Ildlualoa i" Ahupua`a, north Kona District, Island cifflawai'i. ilaivai'i, The owncr is proposing to develop the property and contractcd the a chacological-sludy in amicipation ol'County ofHawai`i Planning Department apphoation re(]uirernents The owner's contact mailing address is 181 Kalanianaole Street Hilo, HI 96720-4703. Prior to fieldwork, a search of geological maps, aerial photos, historical maps, historical documents, and archaeologicaI reports was conducted. A pedestrian survey and site recording were conducted in March and April 2016 by Joe Fatrrrugia, B.A., Suzan Escott, B.A, Tornasi Patolo, B.A., and Glenn. Escott, M.A. A series of nortlt/south transects spaced 2.0 to 4.4 meters apart were walked across the entire project area. Ground cover consisted of tall California and Guinea grass, A-oa haole, kiawe, and sevoral kirkvi nut trees. Ground Visibility was fair to ptrrrr. The project area lands were used for cattle ranchirig and commercial agriculture from the early 1900s until the present. The majority of the project arca has been bulldozed_ Evidence of buildcOng is visible In aerial photographs as alternating lands of cleared blllldOzer tracks and hands of push pile. Pedestrian surVey cOnfirnted the linear bands in the aerial photographs are bulldozer- cleared paths and linear piles of bulldozcd rock along the cleared bulldozer paths. 'I weniy two newly identified archaeological site,, were recorded during the course of the archaeological inventory survey study. The sites are primarily agricultural terra€ tss associated with pre -Contact era to Historic era atgrieulture. Several rock walls and enclosures are associated with I liwtoric era agriculture and ranching. A pre -Contact era to later post -Contact era lava tube burial and a portion of the old railroad berm were also recorded. All 22 sites identified during the current ATS study were assessed sisgnificant under criterion "d" as they are likely to yield information important to history. The railroad berm is also significant under criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to (lie broad patterns of our history and it embodies distinctive characteristics cif the type, period, and method of railroad bed construction. The burial is also significant criterion "e" as it has important value to Hawaiian people and people of other ethnic backgrounds in the state. The burial is recommended for preservation in place with preservation treatments to be outlined in a Burial Site Component of Preservation Plan (BSCPP). The railroad Berm is recommended for preservation with preservation measures to be outlined in an archaeological preservation. Archaeologic: it monitoring is recommended for initial grubbing within the five -acre prcaject arta and For any proposed ground diwtLIrhance in the vicinity of Site 30592 and Site 30593 to ensure interim consti-uctioa7 preservation mca�ures are in place and to prevent disturbance of the two archaeological sites. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.... ......... .............. ......... _............. ....................... ............. ......... _......... ..... ......... ............... .... ..._..... i LIST OF FIGURES.....................................................................................................................................iii LISTOF TABLES........................................................................................................................................ v INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 8 METHODS...................................................................................................................................................1 ARCHIVAL M FTIODS.......... ............ ._......,...........,.............. ...................,,,,....................,.......1 FIELD METHODS. ...................................... .................................................................... ........ 1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............ ............... ........ .......... ___ ...... ....................... .............. .,,............ ,.... 7 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS.......,..................................................,.......,.........,,...........8 PRE -CONTACT ERA.............................................................................................................. 10 TheKona Field System.-_ ......... __ ................. ............. ................. ...... ........ ....... ... 11 POST -CONTACT ERA ........ ,.<................................................................................................. 14 THEMAHELE......................................................................................................................... 15 EARLY POST -CONTACT ERA AND HISTORIC ERA ....................................................... 20 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGTCAL STUDIES..........................................................................................23 REGIONAL PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES.. 26 CURRENT PROJECT AREA SPECIFIC PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGY ............................ 31 EXPECTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL PATTERNS.....................................................................................40 RESULTS OF FIELDWORK...... ... _ .... _ ... _ ...... ...... ... I ........ ....... _ .... _.41 SITE 30591 Agricultural Complex .................................................................................... 41 SITE 34592 Railroad Berm.. ...... .................... ....... ..................... ............. ...... ........ ...... 53 SITE 34593 Lava Tube...................................................................................................... 53 SITE 34594 Agicultural Complex... . ........ ...................................... ........ __ ...... 57 SITE 30595 Rack Wall...__ ... ............. __ ....... __ ...... ...... ...... ........ ...... 66 SITE34596 HC,11,111..........................................................<................................................. 69 SITE 30597 Reek Wall...................................................................................................... 73 SITE 34595 Wall ... ____ ....... ......................... _..,...... ___ ......... __....... _._..,..:....._..,....._..,...... 77 SITE; 34599 Platform with Enclosure ... ........................... ..... ............ ___ ...... ..._........ ......... 77 SITE 34600 1`errace........................................................................................................... 88 SITE 34601 Rock. Wall ....... .........<........,................. ____ ........ _................ ................ ,....._ 90 SITE 34602 Enclosure....................................................................................................... 90 SITE 30603 Enclosure..................................__...................,....,.............,................,.,..,.,. 96 SITE 30604 Agricultural Complex.................................................................................. 1.05 SITE 50605 back Wall.................................................................................................... 113 SITE 30606 Rock Wall........ ... ................ ............. ........... ......,......................................,... 115 SITE 30607 Agricultural Complex.................................................................................. 117 SITE 30605 Fliclosurc....................................................................... ... ........................ 133 SITE30009 Fnclo urc..................................................................................................... 135 SITE 30610 T,1i7ace ...... .......... ....... ............... ....,............ ,........,.,,............. ,.................... ... 136 SITE 30611 A,,ncultural Complex ....... .................... ......................_.......__........._.__..._...... 141 SITE 34612 L< a Blister.................................................................................................. I47 CONCLUSION.................. ..... ............. ....................... ......... ......... ..... .................___ ......... ........ .............. 152 DISCUSSION........... I .............................................................................................................152 SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSME.NTS........................................................................................................... 154 RECOMMENDATIONS....................,..,......,..,...........,........,,<.....,..,.,,............,....,.,......,........156 REFERENCES CITED..,___ ... .............. 157 APPENDIX A: ARTIFACT INVENTORY... ............................................ _ ........................................ ....... I LIST OF FIGURES Figure I- 5,500 K -Series Map of Hawai"i Island Showing I.ocation of Project Area (National Geographic Topa!, 2003. Data Sources: Nationa] Gcognaphic: Society, USGS)................... 2 Figure 2: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Projccl Area (Kealakekiia Quad, SSRI.2013, Data Sources. rational Geographic Society. USES)........ 3 Figure 3: Aerial Photograph Showing Protect Area (within iced Boundary), Hulualoa, H1, Zone 5 North, 189445 m. E. 2171790 m N. (Google Earth. 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GcoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USGS)...................................................................... 4 Figure 4- %lap of HC)Iualoa I" and 2"" Ahupaa'a Showing Location of Project Area in Red Border(Alexander 1855)........................................................................................................ 9 Figure 5: Portion of Kailua Section, North Kana Map Showing Location of LCA 7713 and Project Area in Red Border (Aki 1952). ... ........ ......... ........ ....... ........ 17 Figure C,: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Land Come rission Awards, Land Grants, and the: Project Area (National Geographic Topo?, 2003, Kealakekua Quad, Data Sources: National Geographic Society. USCIS)................................................ 18 Figure 7: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing, Location of Railroad and Project Area (USES 1928) ......................................... ..._._...................... I ....... ......._........ 22 Figure 8: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Previous Archaeological Studies and Project Area (Kealakekua Quad, SSRI, 2013. Data Sources. National Geographic Society, USGS)................................................................................... 25 Figure 9: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Northern Portion of Har imau et al. ( 1992) Sites and Current Project Area (SSRI, 2011..Sources: National Geographic: Society, USGS. Kcalake kizaQuadrangle)......................................................... 32 Figure 10: 7.5 -Minute Series L.iSGS Topographic Map Showing Locations of Project Area Archaeolugical Sites (ESRI, 201 L Sources: NaLunal Geographic Society, 'USGS. KealalcckLla Quadrangle).......................................................................................................43 Figure 1 l : Site 30591 Plan View Map....,....................,............................................................... 44 Figure 12: Photograph of Site 30591 Feature 1 Looking Northeast_... .............. __ .......... __. 46 Figurc 13, Photo gnipli of Site 30591 Feature 2 Looking,North........ .......... ____ ...... _ .... __ .... 47 Figure 14: Photograph of Site 30591 Feature 3 Looking Northeast. ........................................... 48 Figure 15: Photograph of Site 30591 Feature 4 Looking Southeast. ............... ..... ___ ................ 49 Figure 16: Photograph of Site 30591 Feature 5 Looking South .................................................. 50 Figure 17: Photograph orSite 30591 Feaiure 6 Looping North............................... ................... 52 Figure 18: Photograph oFSile 30592 Looking East..................................................................... 54 Figure 19: Site 30593 Plan View Sketch Map ............................................................. ................ 56 Figure 20: Site 30594 Plan View Map......................................................................................... 58 Figure 21: Photograph of Site 30594 Feature 1 on Leo and Feature 2 on Right Looking South.60 Figure 2.2: Photograph of Site 30594 Feature I in Top Left, Feature: 2 at Center. Feature 3 at Far Right, Looking South............................................................................................................ 61 Figure 23: Photograph of Site 30594 Feature 2 on Lela and Feature 3 on Right Looking South.62 Figure 24: Photograph of Site 30594 Feature 5 Looking Northeast..... ...... ............ ... 64 Figure 25: Photograph of Site 30594 Feature 6 in Foregroundarid Feature 5 in Background. LookingNortheast. .. ........... .................. __ .......................................... ............. .................. 65 Figure 26: Photograph of Site 3059.5 ball Looking North......................................................... 67 ff Figure 27: Photograph of Site 30595 Wall Collapse Showing Cobble Core Fill, Locking North ............................................................................................................................................... 68 Figure 28: Site 30596 flan view Map......................................................................................... 70 Figure 29: Photograph of`Sitc 34596 He -truth Looking West. ....... 71 Figure 30: Site 30596 TU -1 North Profile................................................................................... 72 Figure 31, Photograph of`Site 30596 TU -I Top of Layer TI, Looking WesC .............................. 74 Figure 32: Photograph of Site 30596 TIJ-1 ease of Excavation, Looking West, ..... . ........ 75 Figure 33. Photograph of Site 30597 Wall with Gi,ilch in Background, Looking South..,..,...,... 76 Figure 34: Photograph of Site .10598 Wall Overview Looking West .............................. Figure 35: Site 30599 Plan View Map......................................................................................... 80 Figure 36: Photograph ni'Sitc 30599 Feature 1 Platform with Tap Cleared of Debris Showing Stacked Stene Construetton, Looking West......................................................................... 81 Figure 37: Photograph of Site 30599 feature 1 Platform Showing West Side Collapse, Looking East............................. •.....................................................................• •••................................. 82 Figure 38: Photograph of Site 30599 Feature 2 Enclosure Looking East .................................... 83 Figure 39: Photograph of`Surfac;e Artilacts Collected at Site 30599.__ ... __ ... .......... ........... 84 Figure 40: Site 30599 TU -1 South Profile. .................................................................................. 86 Figure 41: Photograph of`Site 30599 TU -1 Rase of Excavation Looking East.......,.,. ................ 87 Figure 42: Photograph of Site 30600 Looking Southeast...... _ . _ ___ _. . ......... 89 Figure 43: Site 30602 Plan view Map Shoxving Portions of Site 30592, Site 30595, and Site 30601.,.......,....... .... ____ ...... ...,..,......,.......... .,..,.,,,.....,.............................,,......,...,....,.......... 91 Figure 44: Photograph of Site 30601 Rock Wall Looking North ................................................ 92 Figure 45: Photograph of Site 30602 West Wall (Lef0and Site 34595 Wall (Right) Looking East........................................................................................................................................ 94 Figure 46: Photograph of Situ 30602 Enclosure Wall and. Battle ................................................ 95 Figure 47: Site 30603 Plan View Map......................................................................................... 97 Figure 48: Photograph of Site 30603 Southwest Corner of Enclosure Feature 1, Looking Northwest.............................................................................................................................. 98 Figure 49: Photograph of Site 30603 Western South Wall of Enclosure Feature 1, Looking Southwest,........,.........................................................,..............,........................................... 99 Figure 50: Photograph of Site 30603 Middle Corner of Enclosure Feature 1, Looking South. 100 Figure 51; Photograph of Site 30595 Wall Portion o17 Site 30643 Enclosure Feature 1, Looking North__ .... ......... ___ ........ .................................... ........ ___ ...... .................................. _. 102 Figure 52: Photograph of Site 30643 Feature 2 Terrace looking Southeast ............................. 1.03 Figure 53: Photograph of Site 30603 Feature 2 Terrace (Center) and Feature Retaining Wall (Left), Looking Southeast................................................................................................... 104 Figure 54: Site 30604 Plan View Map....................................................................................... 106 Figure 55: Photograph orSite 30604 Fe{atur€: 1 Looking Southwest.......... ............................... 107 Figure 56: Photograph of Site 306041reattire 2 Looking Southeast .......................................... 108 Figure 57: Photograph of Site 30604 Feature 3 Looking Southeast. ... ....... __ ........ __ ........ — 110 Figure 58: Phoic graph of Artifacts Recovered froLn Site 30604, Feature 3. SP- l .................... 1.1 Figure 59: Photooraph ofSiite 30604 Feature 4 Looking South ................................................ 112 Ffgnurc 60: Photograph of Site 30605 Wall Looking Northeast..... ...... ....... ........ ...... 11.4 Figure 61: Photograph of Site 30606 Rack Wall Looking North..._.. ................ .... 116 Figure 62: Site 30607 Plan View- Map............................_................,....,,.................,.,.,..,.,.,,,..,. 118 Figure 63: Photograph of Site 30647 Feature 1 Terrace Looking Southeast....... .................. _., 119 iv Figure 64: Photograph of Site 30607 Feature 2 Terrace (Background) and Site 3W956 Wall (Foreground), Looking Wes[ . .................... .............................................. ......................... 120 Figure 65, Photograph of Site 30607, Feature 2, Western Area Looking East ......................... 122 Figure 66: Photograph of Site 30647, Fea iure 2, Eastern Area Looking Eas L . - . . . ....... 123 Figure 67: Photograph of Site 30607, Feature 3 Looking S01.1th . .............................................. 124 Figure 68. Photograph of Site 30607 Feature 4 Eastern Area Looking North. ............. 126 Figure 69., Photograph of Site 30607 Feature 4 Western Area Looking Northwest........ . ....... 127 Figure 70: Photograph of Site 306077 Feature 5 Looking ................................................ 129 Figure 71. Photograph of Site 30007 Feature 6 Looking South. . .......... —.-- ......... -- ........... 130 Figure 72: Photograph of Site 30607 Feature 7'Looking North . ................ ........ ................ 132 Figure 73. Photograph of'Site 30008 Enclosure Looking Southeast....... ... ...... ........ ........... 134 Figure 74: Photograph of Site 3(k609 Enclosure Looking East .................................................. 137 Figure 75: Photograph of Site 30609 Enclosure Looking Northeast . ....... ...... .................... 138 Figure 76- Site 30610 Plan View Map....................................................................................... 139 Figure 77, Photograph of Site 30610 Terrace Looking Southwest ............................................ 140 Figure 79., Site 30611 Plan View• Map............................................................................. 142 Figure 79: Photograph of Site 30611 Feature I Looking Southeast............. ............ ................ 143 Figure 80. Photograph of'Site 30611 Feature 2 Looking South................................................ 144 Figure 81: Photograph ol'Site 30611 Feature I Looking Northoast. 146 Figure 82- Photograpli cif Site 3061.2 Blister Opening Looking ............. 148 Figure Photograph of Site 30612 Historic Era Bottles and Plateware, 149 Figure 84: Photograph of Site 30612 Soldered Cans ........ ....................... ........................... .... 150 Figure 85: Photograph of Site 30612 Historic Era Bottles ........................................................ 151 LIST OF TABUS Table I: InVOrItOry Of SLibsuriltcc Tcsting............................. ......... —.— ...... 5 Table 2: Land Commission Awards Recorded W 115hialoa I " and 2"d Ahupua'a . ..................... 19 Table 3: inventory of Previous Archae)logical In %-,esti gatiolls ................... ......... ............... ...... 23 Table 4: Invcritory of Heat imau ct al. (1992)Archacological Sites inspection and Assessment ................ ...... - ........ --- ...... ...... ................ - 33 Table 5: Inventory of Archaeological Sites Identified, on the AIS Prqiect Area. .... .................... 42 Table 6: Site 30591 Shovel Probe Results.................................................................. ...... 51 Table 7: Site 34594 Shovel Probe Re s u I is. . -... . ............................................... ........... ............... 66 Table 8: Site 30599 Shovel Probe RC.�Uks ........................ ................................... ...................... 85 Table 9: Site 30602 Shovel Probe Results . ....................... .................. -- ............................. ...... 96 Table 10: Site 30603 Shovel Probe Results ................................................................. ........ .... 101 Table 11: Site 30607 Feature 2 Shovel Probe Results..... ........................... ........ ..................... 121 Tahk! 11 Site 30607 Feature 3 Shovel Probe Result.s.............................................................. 125 Table 13: Site 30607 Feature 4 Shovel Probc Rcsults . ....................... ...... 128 Table 14: Inventory of Project Area Archaeological Sites, Significance Assessments and Site Rccoininendations......... ...... ........... ...... ........... --- ....... ---. 155 V INTRODUCTION At the request ul'East West Pealty, Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) conducted an archaeological inventory survey (AIS) of a 5.4 -acre portion of TMK: (3)-7- 6-021.017 located in H61 ualoa YA Ahugua` a, :North Iona District, Island of Hawaii, HawaN (Figure 1 and Fig=ure 2). The owner is proposing to develop the property and contracted the archaeological study as in anticipation of County ofHawai`i Planning Dcpartment application requirements. The project area is bounded on the north and west by andevcloped cattle pasture, on the soulh by a seasonal gulch, and an the west by developed residential and fano land (Figure 3). The project area lands were used for cattle pasture and agriculture from the early 1900s to the present. The property is owned by Kona Three, LLC. The owner's mailing address is 181 Kalanianaole Street Hilo, I-II 96720-4703. METHODS The archaeological inventory survey was undertaken in accordance with Hawaii Administrative Rules 1-3 13-2.84 and was performed in compliancy; with the Rules Governing Minimal Standards for Archaeological Inventory Surveys and Deports contained in Hawaii Administradve Rules 13§ 13-276. ARCHIVAL METHODS In addition to referencing available resources at SCS, archival research was conducted in the State Historic Preservation Division (S11PD) report database and library facility (Hilo, f11), the flawai`i County land records otfic: . the Wodio a 'Matra Mahele database website, Ulukau database website, the Papakila database website, the Hawaiian collections holdings at the University ofFlawai`i-1 lila Library, and the Ilawaii Slate Library system. Archival work consisted of research on the history attd archaeology of the project area, as well as specific searches of previous archaeological studies in and around the current project area. Historic land use data, land ownership, maps, and narrative information were obtained from the Hawaii County land records officc, Hawaiian internet sites, and the University ofHawai`i, Hilo. FIELD MET11ODS lnVcntory wuITC y Held work was conducted March and April 2012 (144 Man- hours total) by Joe Farrugia, B.A.; Tomasi Patulo, S.A.; Suzan Escott, B.A.; and Glenn Escott, M.A. C lenn Escott provided overall project direction and is the principal investigator for this study. Figure 1: 5.5W K -Series Nlap ofItawai`i Island Slowing Location ofPrnject Area (National Geographic Topo!. 2003. Da %l SOUrces: National Geographic Society, USGS). 2 X1.1 s IAY�.NR 1 w." I 1'l lrwee 1 . x a.: r +. t,- • 4 _ a a wm r i F ! t kF1 P 3m 44P 00, liCtOkAlOWTVATE i.i7r... r la,l.x.l.. r 1�•Ivn„ n I r.,... u � �+1 •.,w Figure 2: 7.5-M mile Series USGS Topugraphic Map Slowing Location of ProjecI Area (Kcalakekua QuA LSli.l,:013. Dam Sources: Natiunal Geographic Society, USGS). 3 I i211rr;: Acri al Phots pjph Shvwing Project A.re� Ovithiu Rest > oundaryL i [(5lw 1oa- l ll, ZOmI 53N(wLb, i 89445 m E, Z 17179') rrk N t(jut5- F uth. 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GcoEve. Earthstar, USDA, and USG5). There were three main field components to the Inventory Survey process: pedestrian survey of the entire project area, plotting located sites on a prol'ccl area map with Global Position System (GPS) Universal Transverse Mercator (U`t' 1V1) LL11Its Gone 5 North) using WSCS84 datum, and individual site mapping, and recording. A series of nortli/south transects spaced 2.0 to 4.0 meters apart were walked across the entire project are:. Ground cover consisted of tall California and Guinea grass, koa haole, kimve, and a tcw Ecukui trees. Ground visibility was fair to poor. Site boundaries were determined by the aerial extent nl' Pcatures and by feature function and temporal association. Features that were in close proximity to each other and that appeared to have functional and temporal associations suggesting they were constructed and used as a functional set of features—these features were included together as a single site. Features that were beyond twenty to thirty meters away from each other, or that were constructed at very different times, or for different very purposes, were separated into individual sites. Age determinations were expressed in terms of recognized tar,ltal eras including pre -Contact era (before 1778), early past -Contact era (1778-1850), Historic era (1851-1965), and Modern. era (post -1965). Age was interpreted on the bases of feature construction and artifacts recovered from excavations. Features at eleven of the twenty two sites were selected for test exc.av< boa to determine site f inctiOrr. c€ nstrLLCUOr method, and age. Two types of hand excavations, shovel probes (SP) and test units (TU), were used depending on the size sof features, percentage to be excavated, percentage of screening, and overall goals of excavation. A total of 29 shovel probe_; and two test -units were excavated at eleven sites (Table 1). Table 1: Inventory of Subsurface Testing. Site # Site Type features Visite Function Testing 30591 AgricL luaal Conplex 6 Agrieulturc 5P-1. 2. 3 30594 A�LIriCL111LLra11 CL)rnple-X (3 A,IricLLiture 5P-1 & 2 30; )(, I1earth 1 Food Preparation TCI -1 )0449 Plai1Or1F1 & Fnalcsore SP -1 & ?, T13-1 3061if1 Tcrraee I :1 ricullurC SP -1 30602 Liic[0SL11V 1 Raachin&,' griculturc 5P-1, ?. 3 & 4 30603 Llidosurc 4 Sp -I & L 30604 Agri4ulLLLral C oniplex :l A'rirtIItMe SP -1 30607 Agricul[L111,11 Cc►mplex 7 AU71-ic•LLlLurc SP -1 to 5P-10 30610 Terrace I :1LLIILLE-C SP_I 10611 Agrlcuulviral Complex 3 41'ricLLILLLLc SII - l. 2. ) Test -units were excavated as 0.5 x 1.0 meter or 1.0 x 1.0 meter units, dug in natural stratigraphic layers. These were excavated at features that were thought to have a high potential io yield functional arid temporal diagnostic artifacts, and used where vertical control Would coniribuLe to this data. Shovel probes (SP) were units that were roughly 0.4 x 0A meters square, and were used to examine stratigraphy. and assess the presence or absence ol`crcltural deposits. Test -unit and shovel probe excavations were screened for cultural material through II$'h inch mesh. Stratigraphic profiles were drawn for° test -units. Disarticulated human skeletal retrains were identified within a lava tube: during the field survey. The skeletal elements were partially covcrcd in shallow sedinicnr_ Sediment was cleared in small incremerr.ts from a partially covered pelvis to aid in identification. SHPD was notified and approved of the clearing ofsediment frorn the pelvis. CUltural material was recorded by type on standard SCS excavation forms and collected. Sail calors, were recorded using Munsell calcar charts, soil cornpasition was recorded with the aid of the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey Manual on standard soil stratigraphy forms, and profiles were drawn. Overview photographs were taken of individual site features, sites, excavations, and the project area using a LO meter measuring tape. LABORATORY METHODS Inventory of midden and artifacts collected from the test excavations were weighed and analysed by layer of provenience within each excavation unit. Appendix A contains a tabular inventory of all artifacts collected daring archaeological excavation. Volcanic -glass and basalt debitage was counted and described in terms ofcare, primary, secondary, interior, exterior, or non-diagnostic flakes. For till other artifacts, dimensions, weight, ccutrt, and diagnostic characteristies were recorded. All artifact data were tabulated. Field nates, maps, Cultural material, and photographs pertaining to this project are currently being curated ai the SCS facilities on the Island of Hawai' i . 6 ORAL INTERVIEW Cregg Kashiwa was interviewed by phone on April 19, 2016. Mr. Kashiwa was the prgject property mamiger for parcels 016 and 017 in the early 1980s.and % as present during AIS work documcnted in the Harnmatt et al, (1992). He is originally frorn 0-ahu but lived in Ilona for several decades. Mr. Kishawa remembered that the current 5 -acre project area was excluded from the original AIS because the property owners were planning to give the five acres to a group to use as an agricultural preserve. The rive acres and the property below (to the weso had already been btill&2.ed for agricullural use. Mr. Kishawa knew that there Nvci*c ranch walls and Historic era agricultural features on the project area, but did nett know how tbey were used, as they were no Iongcr in use during his time in Kona. He also remembered the old railroad bed and berin and that there was a small railroad stop along the track just south of the project area - ENVIRONMENTAL NVIRONMENTAtL SETTING The cur,-ent project area consists of an undeveloped 5.0-acrc 1 onion ofTMK: (3) 7- 6-021:01T The project area is situated on fairly steeply sloping land with level areas in between elevation breaks. The project area is between 600 to 680 feet (183 to 207 lrleters) above mean sea level (arnsl). The projcct area lands are part of large fora-1cr cattle r=anch and agricultural area that was started in the early 1900s. -Che lower f►oiilon of the project area Is stIII used to past Li cattle. The project area and surrounding la11ds were bulldozed sometime bctwewn the 1940s and 1970s. Evidence of bulldol,il1g is visible in aerial photographs as alternating bands of cleared bulldozer tracks and bands of push pile (see Figure :3). Pedestrian survey corifinned the linear bands in the aerial photographs are bulldozer -cleared paths and linear piles of bulldozed rock along the cleared bUl[dozer paths. The former Kona Sugar Company railroad bed is present along the western edge of'the project area. The project area ground surface is a Hual'alai lava flow dating between 5.000 and 10,400 years before present (ybp) ("Wolfe and Morris 1996). Soil in the project area is Punalu`u Series (rPYD serir-�) extremely rocky peat with six to twenty percent slopes (Sato 1.973:48). The majority ofthc project area has been bulldozed in the past and the present ground. surface is rocky soil. Rainfall in the project area is very low, less than thirty inches per year. There is a seasonal gulch along the southern edge of the project area. This region is extremely dry„ 7 hot, and som4ftiw hart barren except for thick Calif€ mia grass (Lrochl(ya m wicca), Guinea grass (Afegadl vr,sns maxinnis), and some koa hoole (Le:acaena leucoceplydda). khrlre (i'rosc,pis pallida), and ka kid ntat (Alc•rffitc's rrtOlrrc'cancr) trees (Swrr L-irw irorimental. 2016). HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS Kona is divided into two sections: North Kana or Kona `akau. and: Strath Kona, or Kona hears (%IaIy 1996). Kona 'akmf was Further subdivided into xinrtIi walled Kekaha) and south (called Knarcakai'51m a) areas, with tlhc divis3oli between the two at the ahulma'a ofKeahuolu, The project area is in Holualoa 1" Ahupua'a (Figure 4) within the area ofKonakai'npu a in k'opw 'akar. Holualoa means (literally) "king sled course" (Puku.i art al. 1974.48). Holualoa I" is a traditional ahupua'a stretching from the ocean to the foot of Hualalai in the uplands, The coastline cif"Mualaa I' llhupua'a is primarily low rack cliffs. Very little is recorded of Hco-lualoa Ahupua`a in traditional oral accounts. The Heart Stirring Legend of Ka-hliki, published in the Hawaiian language newspaper Kra !-louts o Hawaii and translated by Maly (1993) contains the only description of Holualoa, The legend is set in the 13`1' century but also reflects more recent influences (Maly and Maly 2002: 17). According to the narrative, The lands of Holualoa were named for the chief of that name, both Holualoa and Puapua"a were high chiefs, who eentrolled the lands from mountain to sea, which hear their mantes.-- Kaluaokalani served as a priest ofHOualoa at the temple ofPakiha. This heiav was near the contest field of Holualoa, .. The lands of this region are named for various a10, all of whom were related.. When the chief Holualoa took up the challenge against Kepaka`ili`ula on behalf of the Kona chiefs, Holualoa called upon leis geed Kdlaipaho a to assist hien in his battle., . HO] ualoa was the first chief to call upon thc: god Kidtn�Ohrwt, and thi% was the he inning, o l' th i s gcds' use by the chiefs of Hawaii [Maly 1993:208-209]. 8 iF +�11 �Y4 511'.5 k;t \y Figure 4: Mals of H5lualco 1" and 2"1 AhultuWaShavving ration of Project Area in [Zed Border (Alexander 1955), 9 PRE -CONTACT ERA H6lualoa, Kana, and much of the leeward side of i lawai `i Island, while well populated at the time OfEuropean Contact. were settled later than the windward side. Many archaeologists believe that Hawaii Island was first settled around A.D. 1,400 by people sailing from the Marquesas (Athens et a 2014; Dye 2011; Kahn et aL 2014; Kirch 2O1.1, Kirch and McCoy 2007; McCoy 2005 and 2007, Mulrooney et al. 2011; Reith et al. 2011: Wilknhurst et al. 2011 a and 2011 b). An article publisher) in the Journal of Ar hacological Science reviewing radiocarbon dates recovered at archaeological sites «n the island ofHawai`i suggests that, by relying on only carbonsamples from short-lived plant remains, the most reliable dates point to initial Polynesian colonization ofHawai'i l51,-Ul l occurring between A.D. 122.0 and 1201 (Rieth et al. 2011:2747). Early settlers founded settlements on the windward shores in likely places such as Waipi `o, Waimanu, and Hilo Bay_ The windward, or ko"olwf shares receive abundant rainfall and have numerous strearns such as the WailukLz Waiolama, `Alenaio, and VlWailoa that facilitated agricultural and fishpond production (Maly 1996:3). The windward, shores also providc rich benthic and pclagic marine resources. The dry leeward shores of 11awai`i island presented a very differem environment requiring a modified set of subsistence strategies. Archaeologists and historians are uncertain about the exact motives that lead to the establishment and spread of settlements on the leeward side ofHawai°i, but some suggest population pressure, dwindling fertile land, growing socio-political stratification. or simply the opportunity for a new start might have lead to new communities developing on the dryer west side of the island (Cordy 2000:1.30.). The process was likely underway soon after initial settlement of Hawai°i Island (Cordy 2040). During this period. areas of permanent habitation were established in Kona (Cordy 101, 1995; Schl'It 1984), Habitation was concentrated along the shoreline and lowland slopes, and informal fields were cleared at higher elevations where rainfall was Ilii A-ric kiltural fields and habitation areas expanded ticruss the slupes and coastal area of ITualalai during the period between AD 1200 and 1400 (Burtchard 1995: Cordy 1995). Ila The development sof extensive formal walled fields likely bean sometime around Al) 1440 to 1.604. This perlud marks the initial construction of the Kona Field System (KFS) (5chilt 1984). The developmew of the KFS may be, in part, a by-product of the need to extract more subsistence resources from Citi increasingly limited agricultural lase. The population in Kona increased dramatically during this period, as reflected in the abundant radiocarbon dates from habitation stntctures, shelter caves, and agricukural sails of this period (Burtchard 1995; Haun of of. 1999; Schilt 1984). luring this period, the stratified chiefdom structure becomes clearly developed in the archaeological record. Lark residcn(ial complexes and heraro reflect the segregation of places and power for the growing hierarchy of high and lower chiefs, and ceremonial stewards (Cordy 1981; Haun N al, 1998; Hornmon 1986). The produce from the formal walled fields were distributed to higher chiefs throug;lr a hierarchy of lower chiefs, responsible for management and collection cel` the cultivated and wild resources. By the time of the Competition Period (A:D 1600 to 1800), the royal centers and larger iar:iau were in place, reflecting (lie growth in power of the rulers and chiefs in the region (Sarrera 1971; Hammatt and Folk 1980. Resources may have reached their inaximurn carrying capacity, resulting in social stress between neighboring groups. Hostility bet{ cctr -rotes is reflected archaeologically with the development of refuge caves during this period (Schilt 1984). This volatile period was probably acconipatiied by internal rebellion Lund territorial 2nnexation (RDmrnon 1986; Kirch 1995). Royal Centers. are located at Kai lua, Holualoa, Kahalu'u, Kealal:ekua, and Honaunau (Cordy 1995). The region ofHalualoa developed into a royal renter in the late 1600s to early 1700s under the reigns of Keakarnahana (reigned 1680-1700) and Keakcalanb'vahine (reiFned 1700-1720) (Cordy 2000:244), Marty 'a 'i unci lronohik-i residences and numerous religious sites are known to have existed here. The majority of the heiav and royal residences were constructed along or near the coast, most notably at Kamoa Point south of the project area. The royal center at 146lualc a was eclipsed in the second half of the 1700s by the royal center in the Kahalu'u and Keauhou region. The Kona Field System During his travels in the region in 1 S'23 %Villiam Ellis noted that the area above and south. of Kailua was. quite a garden compared with that through which they had passed on first leaving the town. It was generally divided into sinall fields, about fifteen rods silLiare, fenced with low stone walls, made cif frag nients of lava which had been gathered from the surface of the enclosures. These fields were planted with bananas, sweet potatoes, mountain taro, tapa trees, melons and sugarcane, flourishing IUXUriantly in every direction [Handy 1940:114 and 162]. Rocky lands in the olden days were walled up all around with big and small stones of the patch until there was a wall about 2 feet high and in the enclosure were but weeds of every kind, ama`u tree ferns and so on, and then topped well with soil taken from the patch itself to enrich it [Handy 1940:1471. These gardens have been studied ui some detail, and are oficn rc furred to as the "Kana Field System Mang of the archaeological projects conducted within bona deal with components of the Kona Field Svstem (Cordy 1995; Newman 1970, 5chilt 1984). This area extends north at least to Ka`u Ahupua`a and south to Honaunau, -vest frons the coastline and east to the forested slopes of Hual5lai (Cordy 1995). A large pot flan af`this area is designated in the Ilawai'l SlI-lP (State ITiventory ofIii storic Places) as Site *0- l0- 37-6601, The basic characterislies and general locations of the zones within the sywterll as presented in Newman (1970) have been confirmed and elaborated on by more intensive and extensive ethnolilstorical investigations (belly 1983). The kala cone of the Kona. Field System is the area from sea level to 150 rn arnsl. This lower elevation zone is traditionally associated with habitation and the cultivation of sweet potatoes (u ala), paper mulberry (wauke), and gourds (rpu). Agricultural features, such as clearing mounds, planting mounds, planting depressions, modified outcrops, and planting terraces, are common throughout much of this zone (Hanunatt and Clark 1980: Hammalt and Folk 1980; Haun ter Cad. 1998, Schill 1984). Dwelling;, arc often SCrrlttirC(I tlhrOU1111Out the agricultural pc)rtion of the kardar but they are commonly conc:cnirawd alolig the shoreline subdivision of the kula zone (Curdy 1981). The shoreline zoite, extending inland approximately 200 m, was used primarily 12 for permanent habitation and other non-agricultural activities. such as canoe sturrage, ceretn.oalial :irui hUrial practices, recreation, and IIshinreIated activity. Royal centers and high chiefly centers were also situated within the shoreline of the kula. These complexes include dwellings for rulers, chiefs, and the supporting populace, places of refuge, and other structures. Single, or clustered, burials are also situated in the shoreline, and near -share kulca (Han et al. 1986, Hanmiatt and Clark 1980; Harnmatt and Meeker 1979). Burials occur in caves, within finely built platfon-ns, cruder rock mounds. and houses in the shoreline. and are more often in the near -shorn kul a {Gordy 1935: hark ei al. 1986: Schilt 1994: Tainter 1973; To onari-Tug& 1993), The large, and densely populated, royal centers were situated at scvcral locations along the shoreline between Kailtaa and H naunau (Cordy 1995; Tomonari-Tuggle 1993). The residential areas, large and small hciau, sporting areas, and burial clusters, are present continuously farther inland than the usual 200 meters I:or the shoreline habitation portion ofthe 4-111(1. C:oaa,cgLi01atly, a variety 0f11011-Ligriculturr1l ligatures are present in the kola near royal centers. The kallr'uhi zone above 150 m amsl is a wetter re Bion above the karla where bread fruit and other arboreal crops were cultivated (Kelly 1983). Sweet potatoes t Ipomoca halata ). ri, (G'ordi,thae fi-trticosa) (Brous.€erre 1}cjvrtpra), tam t ( -rdocasi a es culerarra), and sugar cane (Sac•ch aa•araaa sp. ), planted among the arboreal craps, were mulched with grass (Menzies 1920,75-76). The current project area is in the lcah011n zone, Above the kaataf'aalu zone. in the 'apca'a zees(, liclds with low stone walls were cultivated with bananas, sweet potatoes, taro, w alike. melons, 1i and sugar cane. The `apca'a zone was notable for fresh water springs. Above the `appa'a zone was the 'arnax `ar zone where walled fields were created to gnaw plantains and bananas. Timber from various Iree species was collected from the 'apa'a zone and the am a'u torte. Bird catching and other forest resources extraction activities were conducted in these upper moo zones. Temporary habitations were constructed to be used seasonally when working in [he uplands. In the region, people initially moved rotes coastal settings and Mort: upland settings (e.g., the '61) a'a agronornic zone) at the same time, essentially ignoring the drier intermediate zone (except. of course, as a throughway between their gardens arid the set). In this way, the first seitlers could immediately plant seedlings in the wetter uplands, 13 knowing the crops could succeed. Pvrnilaanent settlement would have first been restricted to the coast, but the same people would have also been occupying the uplands (at least temporarily) as ►veli. It is only later that the 'intermediate zone°(and the kala `iA agronrrnic zone), would have been utilized for planting. POST -CONTACT ERA The extensive features of the Kona Field System were exploited and altered during the post -contact era. Walls, kna `iwi, springs, and pathways created generations earlier were used and planted with alien cultigens (coffee, cotton, sugar, citrus, and sisal) and uIt1mate Iy used as pastures for cattle. Ranching has its roots in the first cattle and sheep brought to the island in 1793 and 1794 by Vancouver. Two crows, three bulls, five ewes, and five rams were released to prosper in the region ofKealakekua in 1794 (Vancouver 1967:(3)] 1). Kamehameha placed a tcn-year kalm on the killing of cattle so than they would have i h 0 opportuniIV to rnLiltiply. A 486 -acre stunc corral was guilt in the: uplands of Lchu-ula-Hortua`ino, abovc Kainaliu where they were raised (Bowser 1880, cited in Maly and Daly 2041:285). Two American captains. William Shaler and Richard Cleveland present4d two horses to John Young in 1803. Cleveland later returned with more than 2410 horses brought from California. Donkeys, mules and oxen were also impermd t )r transportation and. hauling, Goats were also brought to the; island and 101 to multiply in [lie wild. By 1813 to 1815 cows began overrunning agricultural fields and became a clanger to travclers and residents (Ellis 1963: 291; Wilkes 1970: 204). A number of walls were commissioned to keep feral sheep, goats, and cattle out of agricultural areas and :Tway from homes. By 1848. in Kona District a Great Wall (the Kua.kini Wall) was constructed from Lanihau to 'Onouli (Maly and Maly 2001 -286)_ In 1830 Governor Kuakini moved to oversee and improve govcniniclit cattle l)y constructing corrals. Liholiho visited the same year to witness strides rnadc in the nascent cattle ranching industry. It was hoped that the exportation of tallow, hides. and salted boom would supplant the; defunet Sandalwood trade as a antejur source of income. Several ventures rclared to ranching, including tallow making, tanning, saddle making, and blacksrni(hing were initiated (Bergin 2004: 156). Cowhide was tanned using the astringent bark of local trees (Wilkes 1970: 218). The lion's share of commercial 14 enterprises on the island involved supplying whaling ships and the local market with beef: The changing subsistence and trade regimes developed by incoming European and American settlers, as well as other historical factors, caUsed a depopulation of the coastal areas of lona. ranches were established at middle and upper elevations, and farms were established In the uplands where rainfall w s higher and the temperatures were cooler. Cattle ranching and clearing ibr sugar cane and coffee removed many of the endermic species of plants. The suite of vegetation that existed prior to tlic pre -Contact era were replaced by koet haply (l.euc ue na leoc•ocephala), kiawe (,Prosopis puffida), and other newly introduced invasive plant species. Schools, churches, stores, and other businesses were also established in the uplands. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, coastal Kona was no longer the dcrisely populated sociopolitical center it once was. It became a small cluster of houses along the trail From Kailua Bay to Kequhou (Tomonari-Tuggle 11993:15). Homesteads, ranchos, and plantations developed in the uplands during this period as reflected in the pattern of Land Commission Awards (LCA) and Land Grants (LG) recorded during the Mahele_ THE MAFHELE With the coming of the Grcat NUihc1e ( 1845), the Alien Land Ownership Act (1850) and the Kulcana Act( 1850). the traditional Hawaiian arcltictype of land -use was essentially deconstructed and replaced with the European concept of fee -simple land ownership, Article IV of the Board of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles was passed in December 1.845 and began the legal process of private land ownership. Through the Maliele of 1847-48 the .Alien Land Ownership Act of 1850 and the Kuleana Act of 1850, land was made available for private ownership. The Mahele established a board of five commissioners to oversee land claints and to issue patents and leases for valid claims. Kauikeaouli (Karneltameha 111) established and ratified laws to protect HawRilan crown lands as foreigners began claiming ownership of land they were granted permission to use for homes and business interests {Daws 1968 111, Karne`elolhlwa 1992: 169-70, 1 ?6, Kelly 1.981, 45, Kuykendall 1938(1): 1.45 footnote 47, 152, 165-6. 174;), Among Other thin&N. foreigners were demanding private ownership of land to secure their island investments (larne'eleihiwa 1.992: 178; Kuykendall 1938(l): 138, 145, 178, 184, 1.02. 20£, ?71). l5 tinder the Mahele and subsequent acts (the KUleana Act of 1850 and the Alien. Land Ownership Act cat` L 850), the lands ofthc k1 gdom of I-lawai`i were divided among the king (crow -n lands), the cih'i and koTFrpi)r'ki, and the government. Once lands were thus divided and private ovmership was instituted, the , alha'dinmmr (commoners), if they had been made aware ofrlie procedures, were able to claim the plots on which they had been cultivating and living as stipulated in. the Kuleana Act (1850). These claims, however, could not include any previously cultivated or presently fallow lard. okpaa'u, stream fisheries, or many other resources traditionally necessary for survival (Kamceleihiwa 1992:295; Kelly 1983:45-76; Kirch and Sahl ins 1992 vol, 1.3, 135-137, andvol,?:2). The right of claimants to land was based on the written testimony of at least t-wo witnesses who could corroborate the claimant's long-standiriv occupation and use of the paree](s) in question. The claimant might have been awarded a patent for the property, subsequently calle€1 Land Comrnission Awards (LCA s) (Ch inen 1961:1.6). The. Land Commission awarded the majority ofH€tlualoa I" and 2"d Ahupua'a to Victoria Kamamalu Ka`ahumanu IV, Kahitta Mid of Hawai°i Island and Crown Princess offlawai`i as Land. Commission Award (LCA) Number 7713, `Apana 43 (Figure 5). Several smaller LCA, and Land Grant (UG) prolwrticx were also recorded in the upland region of 1461tialoa 1' and 2" `1 A111UpLia`a (F' Okii-e 6). Twenty four Land Commission awards were recorded in Mlualoa 1" P+Ahupua'a, the ahupua`a where the project area is located (see Figure 0 and Table ?), All but two or the LC awards (LCA #3660to Munn and LCA 47713 to Kamamalu) were in antra (east) of the current project arca. With the exception of these LC awards, the average award was 2. 8 acres, most (n=16) were for less than 3.0 acres. Three Lancs Grants (LG 41592, 1662, and 3634) were also recorded in Holualoa I" and 2nd Ahupua'a, L(i it 1592 was a 25.0 -acre parcel sold to Kealalio and LC !#3630 was a 38,2 -acre parcel sold to W.H. Cromwell, Almost all of the awards and grants were used as subsistence and commercial farm land, and some were used to pasture cattle. 16 Figure 5: Portion of Kai 1w, -Sccdon- Noah Kona "vlap Slinwing Location of LCA 7713 and Project Area in Red 3order(Aki 1952), 17 r. 01 -Int ImLl —.2 Pi Figure 5: Portion of Kai 1w, -Sccdon- Noah Kona "vlap Slinwing Location of LCA 7713 and Project Area in Red 3order(Aki 1952), 17 •7\.. is iR. _) .i �a �,� i y� •:i � • `�9h � . �� �. '�y: "-r�i.. !"w ' .�,�. � _ - i s• � .ten IL 13 -ai �r tii1 y r rt \ a n ■ .IN IIr1111111 ' 'Yi, r� r" ! •, '� - 1,9\NIIPM 41l5MY11 iM IRlY ,R- I r I o - �� a-. �,.. ' 1* •mow d y E ­77waartsrc Flgum 6; 7,�-Minute Serie-,USG5 Topo} aphiw Map Showing L..malv1n of 1%N mds- I :1119 Cli`li'1 :md the PzoleG[ Area (National Geographic Topol, 20K)3, Kealakekun Quad. plata Sources; National Geographic Society, USGS}, 18 Table 2: Land {:ommissicm Awards Recorded in Holualoa ISI and 2-"" .khupua'a. LCA# AWARDED TO AHUPL1A°A ACRES ;666 John G. Munn Holualoa 1" 1 1 1.5 4:10 Kekai 1161tialoa 1-1 1.7 552 Kauita I V)111,11o: 1" 1.9 w S4 Keatvck(rlulLC Hi:}]Luka~ 1" 11.27 5'9 Keilikuliuk axle W)klalou ?"" �M() K[10 LLiiauila I b-, I 1 ' 1.74 .993 6063 0107 Hann Naas 1 f I1, ILlaiOZI 1`` 3.44 7:319 7340 7340:14 KiL,imiaL L._ K >>,i 1 Hs hialo, i 1"" I1-ILr,L O:i i"' I I0ILU —,,,L 4.15 2 5 1.3 71=13 lt:il;l7e:: :,.i 110.1L t, -)a 1 1,94 7713 Ki LIII,1137,11LL I INtialc,7 I"&, HO1naloa Z Lar -c. 7746 Kamalhalu H�,lualo a. I x.17 7794 KaL.1 i14ip1 Holalalo.- I " l .l� 79,90 PSI uka H61italoa. 1" 1.1 SO1 ? Ai o H61ual[ a 2" IA 8151 Hehena H61Lialaa. 1" 2.3 8223 tkaiaka Holualaa 1" 3.5 9915 Limaliana llolualoa 1" 142 5932 Luniame "8luftlna l" 2.98 10770 Pulloitc Ilalualoa I" 3 06 1{� { l #lflI�7l�ikaohl HOlualoa I` & Hotual�ruf rra _ 3-5 19 EARLY POST -CONTACT ERA AND "IISTORIC ERA Fonital cattle ranching began in the Kona region in the mid- I800s, but wild rattle may have been In the area as early as the late 1700s. The pea ` hw ('walls of the land'), native tenants' wall enclosures, were prevalent in the area. as indicated by their inclusion in many local ffhele testimonies. Ifliese were used to mark the boundary of properties and to keep livestock out of crop areas (Kuykendall 1957.318 note 76). Later. cattle ranchers built walls to control tlieir cattle. In the early 1840s, cattle were said to be "maintained on the kula," a m I I e from the coast where the ground was "covered with herbage" (Wilkes 1845:4, 951. Cattle, introduced to Kona by Vancouver in 1794, became a nuisance later, when their numbers increased. They fed on the grass of the kula and from time to time on the thatch of Hawaiians' horses and on vegetables in their ga_trderrs. The open upland fields, bounded only by lmv earth and stone walls, were in full cultivation in the 1850s [Kelly 1983-761. Ranchers leased land below the railroad to graze cattle that they owned (Kelly 1983:1 1 1). Higher walls Acre built in the 020s wid 19300 to control animals. According to Jae Gomes, a longtime rancher in the area, Walls about 3 ft logit can keep donkeys pcTinett The usual wall is ahout 4 11z ft high and keeps cattle in. For goats you need a wall 6 to 811 high. For wild pigs you need a 6 to 81i -high walf. They climb over lower walls easily. They come down from the mountains for macadamia nuts and also in mango season for mangoes [Kelly 1993,1121. Sugar was a major crop in Hawaii tr', 1 rLLI V as signing of the Reciprocity Treaty to 1876 (Kelly 1983-90). . The sugar industry grew rapidly. and by 1899 the only sugar trill in the Kona area was built by the Kona Sugar Company. Many Chinese worked on the sugar plantations (Kelly 1983:111). They built a railroad in 1901 to haul cane from the fields to their mill site along the Wai`aha stream, north of the current project area, The strearn did not provide: enough water to mill cane year round and conipauy failed in 1903. The Kona Sugar Company was bought by James Castel in 1906 and was later purchased by Japanese investors. The Kona Sugar C omp�in% continued to operate until 1926. N) The railroad was bought by Kona Development Company, and was used for frei�4lit, su�arc:ane� and by the Hawaiian Lumber Company. Sugar was grown above the railroad l ine. The cul sugar was delivered to the tracks with the assistance of gravity, by wire cables anti flumes. The rail line was seven mules long and extended from Mlualoa to Keopuka (Figure 7). Cotton was grown on lands below the railroad tracks (Kelly 1953:1 1 l ). Cotton gins were located south of the project area. Cotton was being picked as Late as the 1930s, Other plcrr , gr{awn below the tracks in the dryer lands were sisal and tobacco (:Kelly 14-)8 w:1 1, ). Traditional Hawaiian subsistence practices, including the rights to collect resources from all ecological zones of one's ahnInr€r `cr, were challenged, restricted, or prevented. As private land owners considered their property off Ihnits to others, cultivation and collection cif' resources on privatc land diminislic.d. Individual .Hawaiian. cultural beliefs, specialized kiioledge, and practices associated with the usc of the different ecological resource zones also diminished. The development of cattle ranching and commercial crops, such as sugar cane and coffee. removed traditional cultigens and rources from large swaths of the lands of Dana. The changing subsistence and trade regimes developed by incoming European and Aflnerican settlers, as well as other historical factors, caused a depopulation ol'the coastal areas of Iona. Ranches were established at lower elevations and farms were established in the uplands where rainfall was higher and the temperatures were cooler. Schools, churches, stores, and nthcr businesses were also established in the uplands. Curing the late 1500s and early 11300s, H61ualoa was no longer the densely populated sociopolitical center it once was. The coastal area ofilolualoa had became a small cluster- of houses along the trail from Knilua Bay it) Keauhou. The Project area is just make -ii (wc;st) of the majority of land commission awards and is at the same elevation as portions of the land grants in the region. Based on historic documents, the project area aril surrounding lands were likely h ing used for subsistence and commercial agriculture, as well as for cattle pasture from the raid to late I NOS, The project area might have been used later than surrounding lands because of its steep slopes and very rocky soil, but based on aerial photographs. the project area was bulldorcd sometime around the 1950s in preparation for commercial agriculture. '1 i 'f�F It}0M',■�Ii - . 1.1 J ' k 1.r AN41m w'i meq`^ v wvxF.■�i 1 s - 4' c• • r r,i 4_• ��I 5� Figure 7: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USES Topographic Map Showing Localson of Railroad and Project area (USGS 1928)- 22 PREVIOUS ARCH.AECl1.(1GICAI. STI 'DlFS There are at least 33 previous archs9t olw-,it:ol r. ports for lands near the current project area, including studies in Puapua'a 21l`l and Holualoa V", 2"a, and 3`d Ahupua`a (Table 4 ,and Figure 8). The: studies were conducted li•om the coast to roughly 1,160 ft amsl and encompass the kola region (0-500 ft), the kala `idu region (500-1,000 ft), and the lower portions of the 'e wa region (1,000-2,5M it), Results of the previous archaeological studies are Summarized below by elevation: studies numbered 1 through 15 in Table 2 and Figure S are situated from the coast to Queen Ka'abumanu Highway (U- 360 ft ams]), studies 16 through. 21 are located from above the Queen .Ka`ahunlanu Highway to just below Hualalai Read (306-760 ft amsl), and studies 22 through 24 are above Hualarla.i Road to just above l Rmalahoa Highway (1,100-1,460 ft arns)). Table 3: Inventory of Previous Archaeolo<rical Investigations. Projecl \ut111Ser Reference Tree of Study Area in Acres Results (Figure 8) I LaTicli kllll :F 411. 1 COO alt I1 ltL7lt1� 9�lll 46 �191ti hlvk�ii1ot-, k l'tt'4 Anliacolog:�:al Data I Catis e9 al. 20t}4 N ;1 10 Sites RCCO� cry' Carlson & RoscT)dai sl n:IiLico10gicitl � 65 64 Sites - 1990 111VOI10ty SLLCVCti Archaeological Haun eta]. 199 13 31 Sites 1911'�;I1t4�1 � �tli'�'CV' 4 Hainma91 & Fotk 19XI Ai'cl avolo,,,rcal SLiiVCV 91i 20 Saes Archaeological. SLw-� 44 1�'dn1TTi;a91 o al G���h 11} 21 Slft' & l:.xca,Yaticros, Arclutcolopuical Data Fl, ll[t & I Cc[lrti 001 1. 5,) t Site ArchaeflPogical 6 f':�.�[n[ _4113 2 Sites Inve311orw Sun .y °� I'C-�7r3Ct7�S1irFL'lll 7 Sinoto 1971) l Lt?17[lnlJn .l[7t� S[[r12 C> Rock Walla 9 llanviion 1979h K'71CS 9 Hiilrinl lli I t riii' 9"Iit'S Conolly & Clinlic',5 Arc li;iA!Ologi girl 10 Ko Sites 1979 K1:L'c iuzils:,,t ii'a S[IF�I, ' ILJILIA�010}-ACrl 1f1 Hammatt 1979,a . 46.8 11 sites InveilIon,� S t i i t l taicllacologLcal'SLONCY 1 U H:iiimiLk19 1980 103 88 silcs & Exca4atio[1 ArchLlco[oLIcLfl I I Nelson cl ;i 1, 21 M5 22 Sire hivLmtory Survey Arw:haieoIugicaI 12 Roacttclbal 1978 Rc4 eonnaistisiice Survt t 5>,te 12 Soohrm 1980ii Arc hLiculo aic•Lil 11 A 7 Sites i3 s. Project Number Reference Type of Study Area in Acres Results (Figure 8 l' we(:1,1L1nal-ocinc Sm -%c 12 Wolfortlt ct al. 2000 .l c11,1,:1}1,.}tri L;11 81 7 Sites Im L`nlor'v SL11'1iv Aadiaculogical 3+several ag. 13 Barrera 1995 Recounai5sance Survey 17 mounds Archaeological I' 1 104 Features, 13 Haun & Henry 2f20WInvelltury Survey 1 K2 ofWhich Were Agricultural) Arrhaoolo.,�icel Field \Iodic ed 14 Rosenda.hl 1989 Inspection 6 011tcros 1 5olti11 191K4 Archacological Studl 17 1'4 S1 (01 ] , Walker & Rowndahl Archact111)giC!1l 1114 6? Silo It)t{ Recunnarlti ancc SUrvL�' X11-vos & Uoodi'ellow Arcl7aeolo+gica>il Data I fi 1993 Rcca,ti t rx 104 tri Sircti Maly & Rosenrlahl ArchacoloiricLLl 21 016 Prescl"x :1:11411 ISI%II �Ilcti 17 Hainrnattcl al. [09-1 1R'`%Wti1+;; .,11 174 7I Silc, IN soe[ -017 l Ygob Ari h Lolaglca 10 l Site l;rr`connal.i—ance Surlr'gv 19 Rechtnian '1000 A-clla�rcal LOOS OS It6'4 ntc+TX Sttrv' 117ecw`pw .. Archaeological 20 fioscndahl 1968 kccolll>,ai�aancs; Stln cv 1 ± 17 Sites 20 Fager & Graaves 1993 Archacvlt�uwal ! i 17 Sites InvLmlory Suris y 1 Site { 149 Archacotevical Historic to 21 1}i1Gk5 E[ 3l. 21113 Inventory Surwy lt1_.�{a 4y Modem Farming FeatrwLres) 22 Desilets et al. 2004 r rc h4��t,lt} riciLl � 11.7 1 Hoir slvad 11� °el7tt�rl Sur' ey Fcal urcw 73 RcchiLtlan 2(.113 �9 tiifcs Clark & PUchtman ArchLicologLc al 6 113'si ric Era 24 2006 Inventory Sane , sih`h 24 i �° mak.*• . ay'My Mgure 8: 7.5 -Minute Serie USGS Topographic Map Showing Local ion ofPrcvious Aruh3CY logical `)ULLIIUti .hIILI Pr jCL:1 %I,:. (Kealakekua Quads. ESRL 2013. Data SUUrces: National Geugraphic Society. USGS ): 25 REGIONAL PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES 1. Landrum et aL 1990, and Calis et al. 2044. PHRI, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory Survcy (Landrum et al. 1990) and SCS, Inc. conducted data recovery itivesilg ations (Calls et al. 2004) at the Kaihakai development project. Thc� project: area is located within the lower elevations of PuapuWa 2"`r Ahupua`a. Pre -Contact era to early post -Contact era cave shelters, {agricultural rock clearing mounds, burials. shrines, and a possible hciau were identified dunrig the AIS study. A heiau complex, several burials, and Pive permanent habitation sinks wL. 0 -t•coirmended for preservation. All of the preser radon sites are near the coast. 2. Carleson and Rosendahl 1990. PHRI, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory survey of 65 acres between Kuakini and Quem Ka;ahunianu highways in Puapua`a 2nd Ahupua`a. Their study recorded 64 archaeological sites including pre -Contact era habitation, agricultural, and burial sites. Seven sites were assessed as significant and recommended for preservation (Carleson and Rosendahl 1990: 34). 3. Haun et al. 1998. PHRI, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory survey of the proposed Alii Drive corridor through several ahupua`a_ Numerous pre -Contact era site complexes were recorded in Puapuat`a 2"d and Mualoa 1" through 4'r' Ahupua"a. The site complexes included a large number of agricuittiral featLtres. as well as habitation, burial, and ceremonial features. 4. Hammatt and Folly 1981, and Hammat et al. 1486. Two archaeological surveys were conducted on a 210 -acre parcel of below Kuakini Highway. The first study recorded 20 sites, anis the second recorded 21 sites. blanc of tltt sites were recommended for preservation (Harnmatt and Folk 1991: it, and Hamma(t et al. 1986: 87). The report also recommended that the single documented burial be relocated. 5. Haun & Henry 24{11. Haun and Associates conducted an archaeological data recovery study at a c -shaped enclosure located on 1.59 acres of land below Queen Kai`ahurnanu Highway 6. Escott 2413. SCS conducted an archaeological w LAY on 1.962 acres of land near the intersection of Kuakini and Queen Ka`ahumanu I,ighways, Two historic era ranch walls were recorded during the study. I SJ 7. 5inoto 1979. Aki 5inuto recorded several Historic era ranch rock walls on a six acre parcel ofIand just mauka of Alii Drive. S. H,ammatt 1979b. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 22 acres just south of Kuakini Highway. Three archaeological sites were recorded during the study. None of the sites were recommended for Preservation (Harrrmatt 1979b. ii, and 10). 9. l lammaatt 1979c. The Archaeological Rcsearch Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 23 acres located in the near coastal portion ofHr)ualoa lit and 2"' Ahupua°a. Thirty nine archaeological sites were recorded during the study. The report recomrtiended that all burials. including a known cemetery site be relocated, ( Ilyanimatt 1.979a: 5). Nene of the reniaining sites (pre -Contact era habitation and a-riculture sites) were recommended iior presc•ryalion in place. 10. ConaIly and Gunness 1979, and Flammarlt 1979a and 1984. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 103 acres within the near coastal portions of Halualoa I" through 4`a' Ahopua`a (Hanimatt 1990). One hundred and thirty six archaeological sites were recorded on the project area. They included pre - Contact era habitation, agricralture. burial. and a cerenionial sites. The Harnniatt report recornrnended that a heiau (Site 6661) was significant and should be prescrved in place (Harriman 19M 4). The report also recommended that the single documented burial be relocated to the perimeter of heiau (Site 6661) and preserved. No other sites were reconirnended for preservation. 11. Nelson et al. 2405. An archaeological inventory survey was condU ted by Rechtrnan Consulting on 25.0 acres located in the near coastal portion of Holualoa 2"" Ahupua`a. A total of 22 sites containing 150 features were recorded. The sites were primarily pre - Contact era agricultural and habitation sites, though five burial sites, a possible Mau, and a trail were also documented within the project area, 12. Rosendahl 1578, Sochren 1980x, Wolforth et al. 2000. P'HRI conducted an archaeological inventory survey of eight aures of coastal Hots}alma 3"i Ahupua'a and recorded seven archaeological sites including threc Historic era. rock "walls, flirt; c residential sites, and Hikapaiba Heiau. 27 13. Barrera 1995, Haun & Henry 2001). Bari -era (1995) recorded a possible burial platforni. two hal}iULI'on site, agriculturai rock clearing mounds and modified outcrops. during a reconnaissance SUI ti ey of 17 acres in near coastal Holualoat 2'0 Ahupua`a, Haun and Associates conducted an archaeological inventory sur-vCy of the property and recorded 12 sites with 1.04 features {Haun and Henry 2(MO:14). The majority of features (n=82) were pre -Contact era agricultural rock clearing mounds. Eleven permanent habitation and one temporary habitation feature were also recorded during the study. 14. Rusendahl 1989, PHRl conductc;d an archaeological field inspection of 6.0 acres of land just below Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway in Halualoa 2°d Ahupua`a Several modified outcrops were recorded in the letter report. There were no other archaeological features identified on the project area. 1S. S-chilt 1984. The Bishop MLLseurn conducted an archaeological study of the Kuakini Highway Realignment Project located roughly along present day ween iia'ahumanu Highway and recorded 39 sites Puapua'a 2'd eared. Holualoa I' and 2nd Ahupua-a. Twenty two of the sites were pre -Contact to early past -Contact era agricultural gardcals and modified outcrops (rock clearing). There were also traditional Habitation platforms and tails, a,� well as Histone era mads and walls recorded during the study. 16. NVaIker and Rosendahl 1988, Graves and Goodfellow 1993, and Maly and Rosendah1 2006. An archaeological survcy (Walker and Rosendahl 1988), an archaeological data recovery study (Graves and Goodfellow 1993), and an archaeological preservation plan (Male and Roseudahl 2006) were conducted by PHRi. Inc. for 104 acres in the upland region of I'uapua'a 2"`° Ahupuat'a. A total of 67 sites were documented within the project area, including traditional (KFS) sites, temporary habitation sites, three burials, and a heiew. The archaeological preservation plan recommended that the three burials be relocated to the heiau site, and Lhat the heiuu be preserved as a formal historic preservation area (Maly and Rosendahl 2006). 17. ilarnniatt et al. 199k2. An archaeological survey was conducted by Cultural Su«eys Fkw, •ai' i oto 174 acres of land in the upland region of Holualoa 1", 2'', and ;"� Altu�ua a. The pmiect area lands had been heavily bulldozed during; the modern era for ranching and agricultural purposes. Despite the bulldozing. seventy one sites were recorded during the study, including temporary habitation features, rock walls, agricultural features, and 28 three burial Sites. Many of the sites were determined to be associated with Historic era ranching and agriculture. 18. Soehren 19800. Soehren condLICied an archaeological reconnaissance survey of 16.0 acres above (ween Ka`ahunianu l Iighway in the inland region. ofHblualoa I' Ahupua'a (Soehren 19SOb) A single enclosure was identified during the survey. 19. Rechtman 2046. An archaeological imTentory survey was conducted by Rechtnian Consulting, LLC on a roughly one -acre parcel located makai of Queen Ka`arhumanu Highway in Halualoa 2°u Ahupua'a, Two rock walls were recorded on the project area - The report recommendcd no further work at the wall site. 20. M. Rosendahl 1988, Fager & Graves 1993_ Fager and Graves (1993) conducted an archaeological inventory survey of 17.4 acres just niauka of (ween Ka`ahumanu Highway in. HbILIaloa 3`d Ahupua'a. Seventeen sites containing 2.7 pre -Contact to early post -Contact era agricultural features. including rock mounds, modified outcrops, C- shaped enclosures, terraces, %valls, and rack enclosures, were recorded. 21. Dircks et al. 2013. Rechtman Consulting conducted an archaeological inventc)ry survey of 10.266 acres of land located between 844 and 920 ft amts] in Mua.loa 1 wC and 2"`t Ahupua'a_ One Historic era to modern era homesteadlagriculture site (Miyose harm) containing 149 features was recorded duriaig the survey. 22. Des lets et al, 2004. Desilets et al. (2004) conducted an archaeological inventory survey of 11.7 acres sof land in the 'djw a region of Flalualoa I" Ahupua'a. A single site associated with Historic era and modern era homesteads, commercial agriculture (coffee), and ranching was recorded. Features included rack walls, roads, coffee terraces, and buildings. 23. Rechtman 2413. Rechiman Consulting conducted and archaeological inventory survey of 29 acres of land located in t17e Wjj a'a region of.Holualoa I" Ahupua'a. Twenty four sites were recorded. The nu jority cat"the sites were associated with Historic era and modern era homesteads, commercial agriculture. Features included rock walls, roads. and ra ninants of`structures. A single pre-Certtdct era to early postJComact era residential and agricultural site was also recorded. 29 24. Clark & Rechtman 2006. Rec;lltman Consultin-1 c011dcrcted an archaeological inventory survey of 2.7 acres ofland located in the `JIm'cr regi on ofIIaluarlQa I" Ahupua`a_ Six sites were recorded, ineIuding five ranch wails and an area of coffee terraces. A number of conclusions can be made from the previous archaeological studies. A primary conclusion is that the majority of habitation features, especially permanent habitation i'eatures, are located from the coast to about 360 ft amsl, below the present day Queen Ka'athumanu I IiVLd ways, The same is true of ceremonial features, burials. and, to a lesser extent, agricultural I-CAtures_ The density of agricultural features and habitation features, mostly temporary habitation features, in the upland regions between 360 fl: amsl and 700 ft ams] is much lower than the site density in the coastal kula and lower kahr `idaa regions of the KFS. The pre -Contact traditional Hawaiian settlement and agricultural patterns are strongly oriented to the kola and lower kaki `tofu regions. Even though cattle ranching and commercial agriculture may have removed some archaeological sites from the ground surface in the kalu'idu region, there appear to be fewer sites than at lower elevations. The inajarity of sites in the kolt )du region are KFS agricultural situ including rock cical'ing 11101-1nds,1110difiecl cnitcl-OPS, gardcn enclosures, and low garden walls. Within the lands of the current project, it is clear thin ranching and commercial agricultural practices have rernoved and damaged niar,y of the pre -C olitact ira'sitcs from [lie gramid surface [see the llaiiinlatt c9 al. 199; '�ur11ntary belm' ). Moreover, many of the sites identified near the current project area are associated with Historic era ranching* and commercial agriculture. A second conclusion is that the establishment of Historic era homesteads, ranches, and conuncrcial agriculture seems to have removed. or obscured, 111e majority of pre - Contact era sites in the upper kt lu `alit and lower Wl)a `a regions. is might he that pre - Contact uses in these regions did not involve the construction of large or pertnanctit r',:,i r s, as in the lower regions of Kona. It is also likely that Historic era ranching and cominercial agriculture in the lower `dipa n region have caused large settle land alterations through the use of bulldozers for pasture and garden. It is possible that traditional features were disassernblecl to build rock walls and coffee terraces. 30 Cl1RRENT PROJECT ARF -1 SPECIFIC PREVIOUS ARCH AF,t]LOGY Lands of the current AIS study are most closely related to sites identified in the northern pori ion of the archaeological sIUdY conducted by l4antMatt et al. (1992). The northern portion of that study encompassed 66.039 acres of land located between 320 to 690 reel (913 to 710 teeters) amyl [TMK: (3) 7-6-021:016 and 017] (Figure 9). The current Project area is located al the southeastern corner of the northern portion of the Hammatt et al. (1992) pl`(tJect arca. In August of 2016, SCS conducted azo archaeological sites inspection (Escott 20 16) of the 20 previously recorded archaeological sites and the remains of two modern agricultural areas (Table 4) identified in the northern portion Of the Hammatt et al. (1992) project arca. The project area and surrounding lands were bulldozed sometime 17c woen the 1940s and 1970s. Evidence: of bulldozing is visible in aerial photographs as �iltc nating bands orcleared bulldozer tracks and bands Of Push pile. Pedestrian survey cunt irmed that the linear hands in the aerial ph€ttographs are bulIdozer-cleared paths and Iincar piles of bulldozed rock along the cleared bulldozer paths. Semen of the 20 archaeological sites (SIHP #50-10-37--10015, 950-10-37-100171, #50-10-37-10018, #50-10-37-10020. #50-10-37-10033, #50-10-37-10334, and 050-10- 3 7-10049, 50-10- 37-10049, hereafter abbreviated to the last five digits) were recorded by CSH in tabular format only (Table 2). These are sites identified during tic pedestrian survey that were determined to be associated with modern clearing and agricultural activities, or were natural geological features, and no written description or plan maps were generated. Written descriptions of'the retraining 1:3 sites are in the CSH AIS report. Excavations were conducted at ten of the 13 sites. There are plan view figures for four of the 13 sites. SIHP #10011 (CSH Site 9i Site 10011 is a rectaltgular plat Form on slightly sloping bulldozed pasture land. As described by CSR, the feature has formal construction elements suggesting possible use other than agricultural rock clearing, including larger rocks (small boulders) forming, an outer perimeter with smaller rocs (cobbles) Forming the interior trip surface, The outer perimeter is stacked one to two coarses high and is roughly faced along the south side. The top surface of the platform is a slightly uneven and level rook paving. 31 NEI,— t,4x Wil Nil MMIF( I %AKA AW L k111-411 11whi P U I &I u IMNFI %I I W. d. .. dM I114. A No IND I n !fmk 1:141. q31 14.1bari ath , 111114290 jlm1j_—. Sk kp-81r 1111110 Figurc9: i,im of Northern Poition of Hammad et aL (1992) Sites and Current Project Area (ESRI, 2011. Sola-cus- NaIRAILd GOOAIaphiC SO�A�Iy, USGS. KcaLaLckua Quadrangle). 32 -fable 4: 1nvcnlery UC SniMalt. d L kk1_ (1992) Areh3tultr�L1[t,tl Sitcs lnspecIion Lint! ANscssnlcm ltc.ulrs. "IiI PiiCSN Sltt'mk Tope runctian Age Ewvralion Ltve1 of AIS tRecvrliin Site A"'ewsentul .:1{1 1 4 PILL1l'urtre Ag. Clearing. Prehi.si.uric Ti^mcd De,.mplion ht`* il.t liL•��r:.77.i1111�I,rI L•�I 1111.2 10 PhI1lurn,& Wall Burial I'n:hisdclric ExLmxtid De_,erilr1e(511_ l'I:nll icu, LL IIroJik:s At?wIik: lit nti 1'[251lilll L)rrCLl ?{Idly i 11 FnOn II i &I La4a 1 Illi I"I:It�mjlikm Prdlimoric ExcaLil'>d Do crlpon & Pla11%ic%4' APS till Ovwripiion {Cord IU{J 1 r 15 1, I'm, Ielalf{Frrn Koo,I Ri'd L aIJIL Raae{, i1a,11.,^Ic I MLD i� No W.' Twh":,1r Tata Lir Ar, h11: 1}r.1 ripiic111 arret:l L utiliurcd — No Luati;rr PmwaL 10011 16 Enclo+um Alaricultimal Flistonc No Tah i ar Ntiatllral Bedrock Oulerop IMP T7 6 IIOL'i:MOW-AS Ag. Clearmn I Ii,trtric Tested Dmcripimn AI'.4 Sill Dcticripirnl Cornet 100?i7 I. r Phtfaril Ag. Clearing I Il le:: No T3hular Nialuraj BvLack Qttwmp 4�1{It '64.134 1I, 11 "I:usillii d n1»PIdA 1'1:11 `1'111 d'111'i'u 4 rig. L IL -m111. 11itL1 : Ill^., one 1kel IN61 T:il+,ll,tr tabular Bulkluird— Nul.angcrPrcwfkt !SCIS Sete l t!"pfioe1 Cor,xxt 10{144 216 T. r,1w ; Agricillturc 6listoric No Tabular Bulldomd —No Lorrger,Present 1( til Uzi I,!'r,1^:=, 11,tbirltian Prchi.s:»rie TaMod Drt'iptidNl .q1S SitC QCtiCrijl[8T1 Correei '+mt14 _.13 [ice: tiu: Habitation PreilLstcfle Tester! DescripIion JI" PI1lnvicm AIS Site Description Correct . IM", = =J 11•.��.+Wud 1311111 1'I.111,1111 liabnartion HLctarlc Tcsied De.x.rtplion ?LIS Sire Fk,, nplion Carred AgnV411i.Lrc ] Histone Tested! Nwrlption 1NS tiny Ik^4er lttii,n C'arm..m 1111171 :!�7 I°1:,1;'1,rni Habimtlon Prchiswric Nu Descriplion BuIIrl,lz:xi IN172 -138 4[o JmL'd 13tuJY Ag. ClcurmEz Hodrw Tnileel De.,puripliun A35 MIL DCSLUP7 ilrlr LiL:eJs' S 1^sreut IdIIJ73 2311 platrollmi Ranellinr,JA�. Historic No DCscl'._,rilnl Relrrwed - L31111drwcd 14H174 :40 Eitelnwrc C efrec Work 41rcd Hishtric T'cslcd De,cr•.5;1nn Alli wits Descriplion l Il cly Corrm I(m"15 241 Eadosure Pig Pen historic No De,tlilxiucl, Plant•iew, d"e Pru File AIS Site Descriplion Likely Carrucr Histulyc Pluoting Ttirr1,:L', Agiwulrw•e Modin No Orl Project mar AIS Site. Deseripiiou Lik,`lyCorreal Rlv(fTcrrq,'c, Agric,ylTltrc ;M(4m No CYnPropxrMap j A,ISDmirip,ionConzct 33 CASH excavated a 1.5 in wide trench IhrouLTh the I.)latform and recovered three cowrie shells, suggesting the platform is a rack clearing mound. The location of the french within the feature, the length of the trench, and the methods used to recover cultural inaterial are not described in the CSH AIS. While the form. construction method, location of the feature suggest it is a temporary habitation feature or a feature used for activities associated with agrtculturc, the small amount of cultural material rccovercd from sulMrrfaee excavation suggest it is a rock clearing mound. The platfonn appears to be unaltered and is in good condition. S1HV #10012 (CSH Site 10) Site 10012 is a rectangular burial platform (mound) and rack wall segment on slightly sloping bulldozed pasture land. The platform was excavated by CSH and the m— were reinterred at Pu`uhonua o Hnnaunau National Historic Park (NHP). The platform has been bulldozed and only the Muss: of the feature rernains. SCS excavated a l .0 m by 1.0 nt test -unit in the center of the feature during the sites inspection and assessment work (Escott 2016) to determine the presence or absence of i w i. The IeS;L-unit was excavated to bedrock and all material was screened through 1f8"' inch mesh screen. There were no itv fragments and no other cultural material recovered from the excavation. The platform has been bulldozed attd is in poor condition. The L -shape roch wall segment waw located approximatcly 95.0 mcters soutl1west orthe burial platforms, It is rou�hl y 23.0 m long (NE/SW) by 1.0 m wide and bctw QeT1 0.5 and 0.9 m in height. The wall is constructed of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders, It Is Cobble core filled and bi-faced. The wall is partially collapsed in places and is in goad condition. SIHP 4 100 13 (CSH Site I l) Site I D013 is a roughly square habitation enclosure and a small modified lava tube. The enclosure appears to have been partially bulldozed after the CSH AIS fieldwork was completed. as the wall heights are touch lower than those described in the AIS report. Rocks from the bulldozed walls are piled along the edges of the enclosure. The base of the enclosure-,valls is still evident on the ground surface, The CSH AIS hiva tube description was assessed to be correct. The interior of the short lava tune is not modified. Site 10013 has been altered by bulldozing and is in fair 10 poor condition. 34 SHIP # 10015 (CSH Site 1.3) Site 10015 is a modern dirt road bed. SHIP # 10017 WSH Site 1.5) Site 10017 is described in the CSH pedestrian survey summary table as a cattle loading ramp. The area where Site 10017 was plotted on the project map is an area of bulldozed pasture with numerous large hulldozer bush piles. CSH determined through consultation with SHPU and Hawaii County Planning that the feature did not warrant a writtcrt description in the ('1911 AIS report. ft is possible that the Feature was determined. to be a bulldozer pile aftcr CSH first identified it, or it might have been bulldozed later. The possible cattle loading ramp (Site 100 17) appears to have been bulldozed or was originally a bulldozer push pile. SIHP # 1001 S (CSH Site 16) Site 10018 is described in the CSH pedestrian survey s€nnmary table as an enclosure. The area where Site 10018 wets plotted on the prQiCCt nuip is an. area of"natural bedrock outcrop surrounding a large tamarind tree The bare bedrock outcrop encloses a roughly level area of soil. There are no modifications to the outcrop. CSH did not include a site description or map of the enclosure in the ATS rcpoil, likely because it was determined to be natural. 'There are no other archaeological feawre iri the area around the bedrock outcrop. A final possibility is that the Site 10019 tQct[ur4 )vas bulldozed after the C'SH AIS work was completed, STHP #10019 WSH Site 17) Site 10019 is six ruck clearing mounds located along the southeast edge of seasonal gulch. The presence of a metal file recovered during excavation of one of the mounds suggests the mounds are modern. The rock mounds, appear to have been impacted by food events., they are partially collapsed, and are in fair to poor condition. SIHP #1.0020 (CSH Site 18) Site 10020 is described in the CSH pedestrian survey summary table as a platform. The area where Site 10020 was plotted on the project neap is an area of bulldozed pasture with iiawral bedrock outcrOFs and loose rocks. A roughly rectangular pile of natural bedrock boulders was identified at the location of Site 10020. The boulders are naturally occurring bedrock small boulders and cobbles, There is a portion along the west side of the pile that appears to contain bulldozer push From a nearby wall 35 breach. The top of'the rock pile is uneven but somewhat level. There is no stacking or facing apparent on the rock pile. The pile is natural, but its roughly rectangular shape and somewhat lei el tap surface make it appear to be a possible archaeological ieatc11 e. It is likely that CSI I added the Mature to their pedestrian survey surnmary table for these reasons. CSH did not include a site description or neap of the feature in the AIS report, likely because it was determined to be natural. S1HP#1033 (CSH Site 1121 Site 10033 is described in the CSH pedestrian survey summary table as a planting complex associated with modern coffee agriculture. There were coffee trees in the area. when CSH conducted their AIS Fieldwork. The area where Site 10033 was plotted on the project map is an area of bulldozed pasture along the southeast edge of a seasonal gulch. During the current sites inspection, it was apparent diat the ground surface in this, area has been impacted by flood events and bulldozing. There are no longer coffee trees and. there is only a single short wall scarlicnt in the area where Sitc 10033 was prcviously identified. The planting 1'ee lturos are no longer present. The L -shape wall segment is roughly 5.0 m long (N/S) by 1.0 to wide and is 1.0 rn in nU1 iTiiuTn hcighk. The wall is constructed of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders. It cobble core lillod and bi-faced. The wall has been bulldozed on bath ends and is M Fair coriclitiOn. SIHP 41.0034 (CSH.-Site 11.3) Site, 10034 was described in the CSH pedestrian survey summary table as a platform (rock mound). It was determined through Consultation with SH -PD and. Hawaii County Planning that the features dict not warrant a written description in the CSH AIS report. During the current site inspection. the feature was identified along the north edge of a seasonal gulch. The platform appears to have been bulldozed. Currently, the Feature is a roughly 2.5 m bang (E/W) by 1.8 m wide by 11.35 m high concentration of rack. The base of the platforin appears to be intact in the ground surface. It is possible that the feature was in this state when ICSH first identified it, or it might have been bulldozed later. The feature is most likely a rock clearing mound. It has been impacted by bulldozing* and is in poor condition. 36 SIEP 410049 WSH Site 216) Site 10049 is described mi the CSH pedestrian survey summary table as two linear agricultural terraces. The area where Site 10049 was plotted on the project map is along the bulldozed north bank of a seasonal gulch. During the current sites inspection, it was apparent that the ground surface in this area has been impacted by flood events and bulldozing. Site 10049 has been bulldozed and is no longer present. P #111067 ICSH S11c 2321 Site 10067 i4 a rack wall and several soil retaining terraces constructed on the slapirg north hank ofa seasonal gulch. Cultural material recovered from excavations suggests the site is Prehistoric and is likely associated with temporary habitation and agriculture. The site appears to be unaltered and is in good condition. SIHP 4I0068 (CSH Site 233) Site 10068 is a small rectangular enclosure. Cultural material recovered frorn excavations suggests the site is Prehistoric and is likely associated with temporary habitation. The site has been bulldozed and only the base of the enclosure walls remain, with the exception of the southeast korner which is still intact. SIHP #10069 (CSH Site 2341 Site 10069 is a modified blutt'lrlatforni. Cultural material recovered r"rorn excavations suggests that the site is a Prehistoric volcanic -glass tool working site associated with nearby agriculture. The site had been bulldozed prior to the CSH AIS. It is in poor condition. S1HP ti 100,70,f CH Site 235) Site 10070 is U-shaped enclosure. The feature construction, the lack of cultural material recovered from test excavation, and the enclosure's proximity to Historic era agricultural rock clearing mounds all suggest the enclosure is related to Historic era agriculture, most likely coffee growing. The site had been partially bulldozed prior to the CSH A1S. It is in poor condition.. SHIP N 10071 (CSH Site 237) Site 10071 was described in the CSII pedestrian survey summary table as a rectangular platform. The feature was relocated along the north edge of seasonal gulch &6 ng the current site inspoet ion and appears to have been bulldozed atler the C SH AIS 37 fieldwork. The feature is now a roughly 5.8 m fort- (EiW) by 5.0 rn wide canc:entration of loose racks on the bulldozed level ground surface. There arca bulldozer track marks on the loose rocks and on surrounding exposed bedrock. The 1'cal Lire is in Maur condition. SIHP #14072 WSH Site 2381 Site 10072 includes two large modified outcrops, terraces. rack clearing mounds, and level sail areas. Test excavation of the largest modihed of lcrop did not contain cultural inaterial. A small amount ol'sc a urchin shell Was recovc,vc] 6,om additional testing of one of the rock mounds. The CSH AIS interpreted the m iL &r 3,;sociated with Historic era agriculture. It is possible that based on the feature types and construction method that the site is associated with pre -Contact era agriculture, though The limited subsurface test excavations to date do not support this interpretation. The site appears to be unaltered and is in gond condition. SIHP #14073 (CSH Site 2391 Site 10073 was described in the CSH AIS report as two platfoms or cattle loading chutes or ramps. During the currmi site inspection, the features were identified along the edge of a rarer:ak a -m ak ai ranch road and appear to be bulldozer push piles, It is passible that the features werc in this Aatc CSH firwt identified them, or they might l ave been bulldozed later. I -lie two fcattirCw Ott Site 14473 appear to be bulldozer push pllws. SIHP #10474 {CSH Site 244} Site 10074 is a roughly �qu:are rock enclosure likely used as a foundation for an Historic era structure associated with commercial agriculture. Cultural material recorded at the site included both Prehistoric and Historic era artifacts. The site was bulldozed at some point subsequent to the CSH ,AIS study, All that rcmains is the partially collapsed portion of what appears to be the southeast corner of the enclosure wall. The site is in poor condition. SI I I P "10075 {CSH Site 241 l Site 10075 is a roughly square rack enclosure interpreted as an Historic era pig pen. The site appears to Have been partially bulldozed at some point subsequent to the CSH AIS study. Portions of the wall comers remain although the walls are no longer as high as they were described in the CSH AIS report. The site is in poor condition. 38 Historic Plantinu Terraces The CSH AIS identified an area containing Historic era planting terraces within the northeast portion of Parcel 016. The features were relocated exactly where they were platted on the CSH AIS project map. The features included racy mounds, linear rack alignments, terraces, modified outcrops, and level soil areas. The features were not subjected to subsurface testing during the CSH AIS. It was likely determined through consultation with S.14PID and Hawaii County Planning that the features diad not warrant testing or written descriptions. The features might he Historic in age. Bluff Terraces The CSH AIS identified an area containing bluff terraces within the southeast portion of Parcel 017. The features were relocated exactly where they were plotted on the CSH AIS pi-qject map. The featur-es were not described in the CSH study because it was determined that the features �,vere modern bulldozer push piles. Pedestrian survey Of' the area during the current sites in-spection confinned that they are bulldozer push piles. All but throe (Site 10017, 10033. and 10049) of the 20 archaeological sites recorded in the CSH Aly are still present on the project area. Two sites (Site 10071 and 10073) were presont but bulldomd to the point that a precise assessinent was not passible. Although the CSH AIS site descriptions for Site 10071 and 10073 appear likely correct. Two sites (Site 1001 R and l 0020) were dcter1-nistcd to be natural geological features. Of the 13 sites that were not impacted beyond recognition by bulldozing, ten were determined to be correctly recorded in the CSH AIS report, and three were determined to be likely correctly recorded n1 the CSH AIS report. The Historic planting terraces recorded in the northeast portion of Parcel 016 were determined to be likely correctly recorded, and the bluff terraces recorded in the south east portion of Parcel 017 was determined to be correctly recorded in the CSH AIS report. Based on the CSH AIS report and a February S, 1993 Uamrex, Inc. letter to SHPD. CS11 recorded 20 archaeological sites and two Historicll lodern era agricultural areas during their initial pedestrian survey. These sites were described in tabular format and a pedestrian survey summary was ,givers to SHPID and Hawaii County Planning for 39 review. SHPD and County Planning then made a site visit to consult with CSH on the preliminary site interpretations and the appropriate level of documentation for each site. CSH then returned to selected sites and recorded written descriptions and created site and feature Man maps for sites at which they were required to do so. The remaining sites were either determined to be natural or associated with Historic/Modern era commercial agriculture and no further documentation was required in the AIS report. Overall, based on the SCS sites inspection and assessment (Escott 2016), the CSH. ATS report correctly identified presiect area archaeological sites and tested, recorded, and interpreted them correctly. All of the Parcel 016 and Parcel 017 archaeological sites documented in the CSH AIS report were recommended for no further work (Hammatt et al. 19$U8). The recommendation was made as "tire significant material from the study area has been recovered and further investigation would he of minimum productivity, (I 111111111:ILI et al. 1984:381. I -he majority of sites (n=14) documented in the northern portion of the Hammatt et al. (1992) project area were interpreted as Historic era ranching and commercial agriculture features. Only six sites were interpreted as pre -Contact era to early post- ColitaCt era, fclur ofthcm were associated with temporary babitatiom one with a�'ricLIlILIFt11 rock clearing, and one with burial practices. EXPECTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL PATTERNS Based on previous archaeological studics, geological studies, historical research, interviews, and County Planning Department records it is expected that any archaeological sites rem<<ining on the current project area will be related to traditional prc-Contact era agrictilturc. tcinporary habitation. burial practices, and to early post - Contact era and Historic era ranching and agricultural activities, It is likely that many of the pre -Contact to early post -Contact era sites have been removed or disturbed by f11stori.e era and modern ranching and commercial agriculture. This is especially true because the area around the current project era ways used as cattle pasture from the Historic era to the present_ Additionally, rhe project area is in a location that was bulldozed sometum between. the 1940s and the 1970s in preparation for a commercial agricultural project, most likely coffee growing. Aerial photos clearly show that bulldozer transects were cut north/south across the entire five acre project area. 40 Archaeological site and ieatureS thal are likely to remain on the project area will likely include pre -Contact era to ear]v past -Contact era rock clearing mounds, terrace, small enclosures, and burials. It is also likely that Historic era. .and modern features related to ranching and agriculture will also be identified on the project area. These include primarily rock walls constructed to confine cattle. RESULTS OF FIELDWORK Twenty two newly identified archaeological site; were recorded during the course of the archaeological inventory survey study (Table 5 and. I+igurc 10). The sites are primarily agricultural complexes and terraces associated with pre -Contact era., through early past -Contact era to Historic era ago .culture. Several rock walls and enclosures are associated with Historic era agriculture and ranching. A pre -Contact era to later post - Contact era single lana tube burial was also recorded. A portion of the old railrcaad berm was also recordedalong the eastern edge of the project area. All site numbers are preceded by the prefix #50-10-37-. SITE 30591 Agricultural Complex FUNCTION: Agriculture AGE: Pre -Contact to Early Past -Contact Era DIMENSIONS: 20.0 m (NfS) by 9.0 m by 0.95 m in max. height CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP -1, SP -2. SP -3) DESCRIPTION: Site 30591 is an agricultural complex Imated within the northern portion of the project area, immediately south of the north project area boundary (see Figure It)), The site is situated at 650 1`t ams] an a west facing slope, among koa haale trees and Guinea grass ground cover, Tho complex is six terraces and }slanting features (Features I through 6) constructed on a level area along a west facing slope (Figure 1.1). The site is approximately 20.0 to in length (N/S) and 9.0 ni wide, with a maximum height of 0.95 m. There is a onaukc Jmakaj rock alignment at the center of the site and level terraces extending north and south from the rock alignment. Feature I through. Feature 4 are south of the atignment and Feature 5 and Feature 6 are north. There are three h( hoe 41 Table 5: lnventory ufArohawlugieal Sitrs ldrttliliccl cin llsc ALS Project Arra. Site # Site Type Features Site function Age Testing 30591 Agri L:UILlLral [°omple;r ii r' g ica[lure Pm iwt to Himedc Fru 30593 Railroad Lv:d unci Berm 1 Tawsportariun Historic Era 3059; 30594 La%;i I tht Agricultural Complex 1 6 Burial A2TIcLLlulrc Pre-C:rmilact lu Early Poll—Cont= Era Pre-Cmitact to Historic Lim Sp -1 & ' 30595 R(-Vk W'Llll I Ran'liing Historic Ertl 30596 1Imrth I Food ilropw:lI iv1 Historic Era 'I U-1 30597 Rock WalI L Rar]1211Jnt Historic Era 305"8 30599 Rock Weill Plafform & Enclosure I ? AgdCOure•kariching RanchingAgriculture l-Contaci lu I'ii tmio Era Historic Era SPA & 3- TU -.l 30640 Tcrracc I Am k:11l l urc Historic Era 5P-1 30601 ltnrl.'4k all I Ran hiug Hi LlOrie Pro 30602 LndLi.4um 1 Ranch in L -AL, riculture Historic Em 5P-1. ?, 3 & 4 .30603 306134 Lw.;Icaure Agricultural Complex 4 4 K>IlFihlll:°'A:il'ckilture A-r,LiIhLIrC HlbloricErtl. Pro;-Cmitactto HistoricL'La SP -1&2 SP -I 30645 Rock W'LilI I ItLlllihm.L::j.'riculwrc Historic Lre .k(t606 kWk Wall I K;Im Ili;li°,V°r t'411rt1T T'rc4;'olxt,tcl to Hlmoric Fr:I 30607 :l"-riCUILu,.0 Complex 7 A41 i,: LI I U13 C Pr.: Cor IucLtu Historic E-ru 5P-1 to SP l0 3U�>I)k 30(+11') I;.ali Ilr.rlrc' I_lldo,m �!rlrc lrlr. 411"Llirilr. L1.14toric Era tl; I.trIC Em 30610 30611 1 Tcri-n,c 1lariCUIL11r a ('11111ploK t ,1crr<u!:.1ar ,1;�.ricIlhkne Pr4�l71itaiL�C] HI64t1'11' 1'.I".1 in I'li0olii: I r:1 SP 1 30(,12 La%a Bh,Ivi int lll4l` l)ilmil N-1-1 Iti 1'r;I 4F +m SIT! ACO.1I 7 SITE J"W W IL J"W n ITL Slit 31ma.) srrK im" NI 4 ;517-i 3tP�V93 41.0 KEN' . PRCLYEC7 ARE 1 -si 417E J415" s c� rf �► SI It AVIS STYE jubli wl'I 1: 311r,"' Figure 10: 7.5 -Minute Series USES Topographic Map Showing Locations of Project Area Archaeological Sites (ESRL -{1 l 1. Sources. National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakektia Quadrangle). 43 �- RXtihIT RM AIN i� TI %IRI,F FA %UoP'E D- F3�U1{LSL I• ® I I{ I !. 14 Q4l I. It JiT IN em 811,0% F wl k.l t( -I- FAHOFROF, 4L+4I3 • I AIL ISG 1H[1ti FI PIlt�l". Figure 111: �,!w .,(i 1 111,:1_ \ 71 'l.w \I;y. 11 wIll 11 HIL.H slabs along the south side of the central rack allIgninent that were placed w=ith their longest axis oriented vertically. Feature 1 is an oval planting; feature constructed along the central rock aliignment and along the east side of the site (Figure 121). It is constructed of a single course of small basalt boulders and cobbles and is approximately 2.0 m in length (NIS) by 0.74 ni wide, with a maxiinum height of 0.59 ni. The feature is collapsed in some areas and is in fair condition. Feature 2 is a rectangular sail filled terrace located immediately west of Feature (Figure 13). it is constructed along the south side of the central rock alignment, The terrace is approximately 5.5 m in length (NfS) by 2.50 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.68 ria. It is constructed ol'angular and sub angular basalt cobbles and sinall boulders ranging in sire from 0.20 to 0.50 in. The feature is collapsed in some:' areas and is in fair condition. Feature 3 is a small rectangular soil filled terrace located immediately south of Feature 1 (Figure 14). The terrace is approximately 3.50 m in length (N/S) and 1.40 m wide, with a maximum height of 0,70 m. it is constructed of angular and sub angular basalt cobbles and small boulders ranging in size from 0.2.0 to 0.70 m. The feature is collapsed in some areas and is in fair condition. Feature 4 is a roughly rectangular terrace located immediately south of Feature 2 and Fcature 4 (Figure 15), The h�rrace is approximately 5.0 m in length (N'UVr'iSE) by 3.40 m wide, narrowing slightly at the southern terminus, with a maxinzurn height of 0.50 M. It is constricted of angular and luta angular basalt cobbles and small boulders ranging in size from 4.25 to 0.50 m. The feature is collapsed in some areas and is in fair condition. Feature 5 is a roughly rectangular terrace located in the northwest corner of the site: Figure, 16), The terrace is conseructeid along, the northwest side of (he central rock alignment. The terrace is approximately 8.4 in in length (N/S) by 4.0 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.70 mt Itr is constructed of eini'ular and sub angular basalt cobbles and small boulders ranging in size from 0.25 to 0.70 tn, The feature is collapsed in some areas. generally where smaller racks have been utilized, and is in fair condition, 45 t r' a, q 4 � v w 47 I 77A ;T T y 700 . r "+, oty 49 q 3 „ o a r -w °.�rP f� o� r, ♦ •. wn • V• .r Feature b is a roughly rectangular terrace located in the northeast corner of the site (Figure 17). The terrace is constructed along the nortlrcar t side of the central rock alignment. The terrace is approximately 6.1 m in length (N/S) by 3.2 m wide, with a maximum height of 0,55 n1. It is constructed of angular and sub angular basalt cobbles and small boulders, some as large as 0.50 m. The feature is collapsed in some areas and is in fair condition. All of the terrace and planting features at Site 30591 are constructed of roughly piled rack., There is nen formal stacking or facing evidont in the feature construction. Therc vk ere no cultural rcinains idcntified on the ground surface at the site. There is a fair amount of bulldozer pushed rock piled along the azraaaka (east)side of the site. Shovel Probe TestiTi—" Three shovel probes (SP) were excavated at Site 30591. The shovel probes were cXca4 atcd �ti itltin the soil area of Feature 2, Feature 4 and Feature 5 terraces. The shovel probes were dug to depths ranging from 6.0 to 32.0 embs, and terminated on bedrock Or large basalt rocks (Table 5). Sho-vel probe stratigraphy consisted of Layer I (0-13 embs) loose (I ClYR312) dark brown fine sandy silt loam overlying Layer 11413-32 cmbs} soft (IOYR4/4) dark yellowish brown line sandy silt. A single fragment of sea urchin spine was identified in SP -1 .and was not collected. SP -2 and SP -3 did not contain cultural material, Table 6: Site 30591 Shovcl Probe Results. Feature SP# Depth tend L,a crs 1303E ,artifacts 1 0 - .32- CID I t, 11 Bas�dl Rmc Urchin Spine Fragment 2 0 - 6 c11-1 I Basalt Rock - 3 0 - 15 cin I & II Basalt Ruch The piled rock construction ofthe site and the fonn ofthe terrace leature5 SLE Zest the site was constructed to retain soil for agricultural purposes. The lack of cultural material on the ground surlace and the sinal l amount of cultural material recovered from the ,hovel probes at Site 30591 supports the interpretation that the site consists of agriculttaral planting terraces and a small planting feature. Site 30591 has been slightly impacted by raodom bulldozing, is partially collapsed in places. and is in fair to good condition. No frtrther work is recommended at the site. 51 a , A ` it _ u P ..yR•s �' e... '" _ �'+ i' !R r i a , s, wWt - tob SITE 30592 Railroad Herm FUNCTION: Transportation AGE: Historic Era. DIME-NSIONS: 265.0 m (SE -/NW) by 2.50 ni by 1.5 in max. height CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Modern Trash Debris EXCAVATION- None DESCRIPTION: Site 30592 is an I listoric era railroad berm located along the eastcrr: hounclary of the project area (sec Figure 10). The railroad Kenn is approximately 265.0 in in length (SENlW) and 2.5 m wide within the project area, continuing north and south beyond the project area limits. The railroad bed is a level dirt and rack surfar:e, and the herrn is located along the west side of the railroad bed. The berm is a retaining wall constructed ul` small boulders and large cobbles stacked up to nine courses High (Figure 18). The berm is well faced with fairly tightly fitted natural rock. The ruck has riot been worked prier to stacking. The herrn face slopes slightly toward the cast as it approaches the top to prevent collapse. Tho surface of the railroad bed Nis been bulldozed in the fairly recent past, likely dui -WL, Ccmti,[FUC iun of the homes along (lie cast edge of the project area property. Porti'oTiL� of the berm are partially collapsed, T1wre is a fair amount of modem construcilon debris and refuse along the couNc ol'thc railroad bed. The railroad berm is in good condition. SITE 30593 Lava Tube FUNCTION, Burial AGE: Pre -Contact to Early Post -Contact Era DIMENSIONS: 00.0 n7 (EIW) by 9.0 m by 0.95 m in max. height CONDITION: Goad INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: None DESCRIPTION: Site. 30593 is a "va tuba located at 610 ft ainsl along the central western portion of the project area. immediately east of the project area bouridarl- (see Figure 10). The site is situated on a western Facing slope, among, kou hoole and tree' with Guinea grass Lzround cover. 53 FIgure 10: Photogmph (if Site 1092 Looking Ensa. 54 The skeletal remains of a single individual'wtere idenlilied in a lava tube near the makcri (west) boundary of the project area. The lava telae can be acre s -sed through two openings, one at the mukai end of the lava tub,,- .:yid a second, larger opening approximately 20.4 meters inanka (east) of the ar akai opening (Figure 19). The lava tube continues east 15.0 meters and east-southeast 25.0 to 30.0 meters Goin the mauka opening. A second tribe, connecting to the east-southeast tube, continues west-southwest 30.0 meters. The nwkvi entrance is an approximately 0.9 in long (E/W) by 0.7 to wide hale in the exposedI)Jhaehrw ground surface. The floor of the lava tube is 0.5 to 0.9 cin below the opening and is primarily Mare lava with deposits of natural pebbles, small eatables, and fine sediment washed into the tube from the opening and a second point in the tube approximately 6.0 m east of the opening_ The tube slopes gently upward in an easterly direction. Sediment from a collapl ;td point 6.0 meters into the tube covers the lava tube floor in thicker deposits nearer to the point of collapse. The distal end of a human femur, talus, metatarsal. and phalange were identified on the surface of the lava tube floor below the ntakcri opening. The skeletal elements were small in size and were deteriorated, making positive identification difficult, The ilium of a small human pelvis was identified protruding from the. sediment along, the tic}title wall of the lavaa tube. apprommately 5.0 ni mc aka ol'the inakai opening. Sediment was cleared in small incmnicnLs to cgiow one half of a pelvis_ Half of the ilium had deteriorated and was no longer present on the pelvis. More sediment (4.0 to 8.4 cm in thickness) was removed to expose additional human skeletal elements located within close proximity to the pelvis. These included lumbar. thoracic. and cervical vertebrae. ribs', both clavicles and shoulder blades. the leii ulna and radius; several phalanges, and two incisors and a molar. The other half of the pelvis: cranium, mandible, other long bones. and remaining skeletal elements were not located in the limited removal of sediment. if these skeletal elements are buried beneath the sediment on the floor of the lava tube, they may no longer be aifiiculdled with the ideritlticd 5keleUil ciciiicrtts. It is possible: that tlwy have moved dovn slcipe ol'tlie ire .char burial. This is likely, as a calcaneus, tarsals. and metatarsals were idetititiecl during a second, more thorough inspection of the lava tube floor under tl e wakai opening—a distance of 5.0 in dawn slope of the burial location. At 5 KEA - In Situ BurLd -Tulw Olyneing (641) Height (cm) Skektid El4munti R - Roof Fall Slope (I 3 (i 41 12 7N mete t�- vlakai I'. I I t Y-:I l li k' R��IJ (121)) 17 2) IF Agure 19: Site 34593 Plan Vie" Sketch flap. 56 least a portion of the femur and several foot bones have moved down slope of the original burial location. Based on the limited removal of sedirnent from the skeletal elements, the burial is of a single individual in a supine position, arms at sides, with head located mauka (cast) and feet makai. The size of the skeletal elements indicates a young adL111 Ofsmall stature or a subadult. The skeletal elenients were fairly deteriuratcd so that ser and age could not be definitively ascertained. The burial appears to be only slightly altered by rainwater runoff flowing through the lava tube and is in good condition. Site 30593 is recommended for preservation. SITE 30594 Agricultural Complex FLrNCTION: Agriculture AGE: Historic Erna DIMENSIONS: 20.0 rn (EAk") by 17.0 rn by 0.70 m in max. height CONDITION, Good INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Heavy gauge wire, golf balls EXCAVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP -1. SP -2) DFSCRIP I ION: Site 30594 is an agricultural complex located at 600 tt a.tnsl approximately 16,0 nesters northwest of Site 30593, along the western lir« jest area boundary (see Figure 10). The site is situated on a west facing slope, among koa haole. and trees with Guinea grass ground rover. The site is in an area of broken bedrock suggestive of an large outcrop or collapsed lava lube. The rock is mostly angular and slabby, though there are also subangular rocks at the site. The complex is six narrow terraces (Features 1 through 6) constructed on a moderately steep west facing slope (Figure 20). The site is approximately z0.0 m in length (EV) by 17.0 m wide, with a niaximum height of 0.70 m. Features I through 4 are roughly parallel and are situated with their long axis oriented north/south. Feature 1 is the uppen-nost terrace along the east side of the site. Feature 5 and Feature 6 are smaller terraces oriented northwest/southeast and are down slope of Features I through 4. along the west side of the site. 57 1ill Niq 4% • / ON Figure 20: Site '0;94 Plan View Map. 5� 4 'm +- 1 a • iI' ail IkI a R i Yq s • hF5 r -y :ba.tiLi ke,K" �} k�5 TI ►IIN.1 Ifl ����� �14pI'1. N114 Ral.#1{i 611.RIM. IRK LPI ® %11 Od.g"Nil ElIII 14,111 f\ 1-1 a144.pa 1 11 Kf a1 I 11411 F 1l'WIlIL%I fIII IIi .I 7 441111 1 1 NOW Feature I is a roughly rectangular sail killed terrace on the east side LA'the site (Figure 21). It is approximately 10.0 m long by 1.K in wir_le� with a maximum height of 0.81 m. There is a retaining wall constructed of piled and stacked angular and subangular small boulders and cobbles along the west side of the level sail terrace. There is no formal facing evident in the retaining wall construction. There is another pile of rock rnanka (east) of the soil filled terrace of Feature 1, constructed of piled angular and stab angular basalt cobbles and boulders. Thore is no formal facing evident in the rock pile. The retaining wall to the west and the ruck pile: to the east are partially collapsed in solve areas. It looks as though Feature I has been impacted by bulldozing, especially along the north side of the feature. Feature 1 is in fair condition. Feature 2 is a linear sail filled terrace located west of Foaturc 1 (Figure 22). The terrace retaining wall trends NUS, curving down slope at its northern terminus. It is approximately 14.0 m in length by 1.20 m wide, with a maximurn hoight of 4.70 in. The retaining wall of the tenface is constructed of piled angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders ranginE in size from 0.40 to 4.75 in. There is no formal facing cvidcnt in the terrace coilsiniction, It looks as lbough. Feature 1 has been impacted by bulldozing. esl}ecU ly alorig the north side of the feature. The retaining wall is collapsed in some areas L111d is, 1n fair condition. Feature 3 is a linear soil filled terrace situated down slope, to the west, of Feature 2 (Figure 23). The terrace retaining wall trends N/S. It is approximately 14.0 m in length and 1.40 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.70 m. It is constructed of piled angular and sub angular basalt cobbles and small boulders, which range in size from 0.40 to 0.75 m. There is no formal facing evident its the terrace construction. The retaining wall is collapsed in some areas and is in fair condition. Feature 4 is a rectangular rock and soil filled terrace located on the south end of Feature 3. The termee retraining wall trends N S and is approximately 7.t) in in length by 2.90 in wide, with a maximum heiglit of 0.70 m. It is constructed of piled angular and Sub aq,ular basalt cubbles and small boulders, which range in size fiorn 0.40 to 0.75 m throughout the southern portion of the feature, The northern portion. is composed of larger rock, incorporating what are likely in situ boulders that continue south to form portions of the soil filled terrace. The level sail filled terrace at the south 59 h 2ti It' 21 : Pi I., r. _ i < h of Site 10594 FOatuW 1 on I.cii and F ealur4 ?ren Dight Looking South_ 6D H IT 2?: (}f Site 101 94 Feature 1 in Top LA. Feature 2 of Center, NeMure 3 at Fur Right.. L mikin} Sout..kt. G1 Figure 21- Photograph +,i° Site .0394 FCefttlrc '_ ou I.tii't :sir! Feature 3 on Hight Looking South. (12 end of the feature is approximately 5.0 m in leng4h and 4.0 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.82 in. and contains rc)ck. There is no formal facing evident 113 the terrace construction. The feature is collapsed its some areas and is in fair condition. Feature 5 is a soil filled terrace/enclosure situated down slope, to the west, of Feature 4 (Figure 24). It trends NW/SE, and is roughly oval. 1t is approximately 5.5 m in length by 3.40 m wide, with a maximum height of fl.t4t1 in. it is constructed of piled and stacked angular and sub angular basalt cobbles and small boulders. The rock is stacked up to four courses high on bedrock along the westernmost perimeter of the feature. The eastern and southeastern portions of the feature incorporate naturally occurring small boulders into the construction. There is no formal facing evident in the terrace construction. Feature 5 is collapsed in some areas and is in fair condition. Feature 6 is a level sail lill�d terrace situa(ed clown slope., to the west, of Feature 5 (Figure 25). The terrace retaining wall trends NW/SE curving up slope at either end. It is approximately 4.5 m in lenggh by 1.0 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.90 m. It is constructed of angular and stab angular basalt cobbles and small boulders, which are stacked up to three courses high along; the westernmost perimeter. There is some very rough facing evident in the terrace construction. The retaining wall is collapsed in solrte arc:tw and is in fair condition. A strand ofheavy gauge wiri and two golf balls were encountered on the ground surface at the site. Shovel Probe Testing A total of two shovel probes were excavated within Site 30594 to determine site function and age. The shovel probes were excavated approximately I LO m from one another wlLhin the soil area of Feature 2 terrace (SP -1) and Feature 6 terrane (SP -2). The shovel probes were dug to depths ranging front 26.0 to 55.0 embs and terminated on bedrock or large basalt rocks (Table 6). Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of three natural stratigraphic layers: Layer 1(0-12 crabs) idose dark brown (10YR3'2) find sandy silt loam, Layer 11(12-38 curbs) soft brown (1 OYR4;'3') sandy silt, and Layer HI (38-55 crabs) soft dark yellowish brown (IOYR44) fine sandy silt. There were no cultural materials rccov =d from the shovel probes. 63 odo SR 4r. 14w FigurvN. Photogmph 305�M Fcalui-Q 5 Lookiii.,-_ 64 419 P_ 7n, FigurvN. Photogmph 305�M Fcalui-Q 5 Lookiii.,-_ 64 igU IT 25. PIILit LY�LLJ[, I u Sate 3U I; : i 1,LttII4 r.i 1 ,n �L0UILd ,incl FeaWte 5 itt Bac kgroLMLL LookiLig Nordieasi, G Table 7: Site 305, ?4 'ihovel Prate Results. SP# Death (CM) Layers BOE Artifacts 1 0 - 55 cin I, 11. III Basali Dock - 2 0 - 26 em i & 1I Basalt Rack - The terraces at Site 30594 are fairly crudely constructed and were not constructed with much formal stacking or facing. The Feature I through Feature 4 retaining walls resemble linear piles of rock left along the outside edges of a bulldozer transect. The rock appears to be from a large concentration ornaturally Occurring bedrock on the "I'Ound surface, possibly the r0l]Minw 01'a callsapsed lava tube. However, the features also appear as though they could have beers constructed as agricultural terraces, especially Feature 5 and Feature 6. Subsurface testing did not recover any cultural material. Site 30594 is interpreted as a pre -Contact era to Historic era agricultural site. The site has been slightly altered by cattle ranching and agricultural actin itie,, is in fair condition and no further work is recommended. SITE 30595 Rock Wall FUNCTION: Cattle Ranching AGE: Historic Era DIM ENSIGNS: 94.0 m (E/W) by 1.10 m by 1.31 to in max. height CONDITION: Gond 1NTFGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials St , RFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: None DESCRIPTION: Site 30595 is the remains of an Historic era wall located between 630 and 690 t1 arnsl within the northern portion Of the project area (see Figure 10). The wall trends rr auk-aimakai and is located on west sloping land with kzlkin rout and koa hoole trees and Guinea grass ground cover. The wall has been breach by bulldozing in several places and portions of the wall continue to the east, beyond the project area. The wall is constructed of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders, incorporating boulders as large as O} 60 m at the base (Figure 26). It is bifaced and cobble core filled (Figure 27). The wall is approximately 9,0.0 m in length (EJW ) u ithIn the pmicct area. by 1,10 m wide, with a maximum height of 1.31 in. The wall bisects the property east to west, tcrtninating to the cast at the Site 30592 railroad berm.. where it is attached to the south face of the berm. continuing to the west beyond the 66 I i T ti .-. a ` .N#. rte_- , P RVjIRW MF Figure 26: Photogvaph of Site 30595 Wall Looking North. 67 lie % a ;Y4k 0 J Figure 27: 11hotogniph of Site 'DO395 WL, I I COIIaPSO Sfhl%k I tl-, ( ON! I I: (ON I i I I, Looking North_ (18 property boundary. A portion of the eastern wall segment, approximately 18.0 m, constitutes the southern boundary of` Site 30602 enclosure. There is a 1.0 in breach in the wall for access to the enclosure. There was no cultural material on the ground surface at the site. Site 30595 is a Historic era wall that has been altered by bulldozing, is partially collapsed in places, and is in fair condition. No further work is recommended at Site 30595. SITE 30596 Hearth FUNCTION: Possible Cooking AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 2.50 m (EAV) by 2. 10 m by 0.85 m in max. height CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: Possesses Inlegrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIF'AC'TS: None EXCAVATION: Test Unit (TU -1) DESCRIPTION: Site 30596 is a hearth located within the northwestern corner of the project area (see Figure 10). The hearth is situated on an exposed bedrock outcrop in a lcvcl area, approximately 10.0 tit cast of the lop ot't, ""hallow west facing slope. Thereare kou has le and kukid nut trees with Guinea grass ground cover throu N)W the area. The hearth is constructed on a narrow finger of hollow pdhoeh e. The top of the small j3dh e "tube" is broken open in places. The hearth is constructed within all opening in the top of the small "tube." It is constructed of cobble and sinall boulder sire hoehoe slabs positioned in a roughly rectangular configuration around the ripening (Figure 28 and Figure 29). The hearth is approximately 2..50 rn in length (EiWand 2.14 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.85 m. There was no cultural material identified on the ground surface at the site. A 1.0 Pn by 0.5 III test -unit (TLJ- I ) was excavated in the hearth to determine feature function and age. TU -1 was excavated as two stratigraphic layers (Layer I and Layer 1I) and terminated on bedrock at 28 embs (Figure 30)- 69 F—01 — ROC K Ed — CM ABOVE(, WWNI) 1-1 R FAC I- PAIME110F SLABS PLACED ON ENDs Figure 28: Site 30N6 1'1;.m % lc� 70 m FigarE 29: IIIitH ivra11h cif Si U: 30546 1 tLa rli l-ookhig 71 I I`Ill� � I f I"�FiI}i:Fitlw= +r *�,•, r �w rl li•n •i �+ til.'41i y r f' /7' � f ' L"NEXCAV.ATEU U Ali �tl 6tl ',ql ("til �—� k E: Y ROCK - D A U ( ,m HUDROCK Figure 30: Site 30596 TU -I North Profile. 72 Layer I (0-20 cnibs) was loose angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders removed from the center of the hearth. The base of Layer I was roughly even with the top of Layer 11(Figure 31). Layer II (20-40 cmbs) was loose (IQYR312) very dark grayish brown fine sandy silt with less than 5% gravels and cobbles, and roughly I% fine rootlets. Layer 1.1 tenninated on bedrock (Figure 32). A small amount of midden (marine shell, laird hone, rodent bane, and burnt kukiri nut shell) and charred material was recovered from TU -1, Layerl- (see Appendix A). Based on the formal construction of the hearth, it is intcrpreted as a Historic era fire feature. The hearth appears to fac unaltered, is in goad condition and no further work is recommended at Site 30596. SITE 30597 Rack Wall FUNCTIC7Ist: Cattle Ranching AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 145.0 ni (EIV) by 0.90 rn by 1.30 in in njax. height CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: }possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATIO\-. None DESCRIPTION: Site 30597 is an historic cra rack wall located between 590 and 690ams] aloha tlac SOWIIcrir boundary of the project area (see Figure 10). The rnarrka/makai wall is constructed along the north side of a seasonal gulch and marks the property boundary. There are koa haole and kukui nut trees with Guinea grass ground cover throughout the area. The wall is constructed of stacked angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders, incorporating small boulders as large as 0.50 m at the base (Figure 33). It is bifaced and cobble core filled. The rack wall is approximately 1.45.0 m long (El ) where it crosses the project area. by 0.90 m wide, with a maxitmtirt height of 1.30 in. The east termines of the wall is at the east end of the project area. The wall continues downhill beyond the west property boundary. Portions of the xvall are no longer present, and may have been removed by flood events. Site 30597 is an 14istaric: era ranch wall, and although it has collapsed in some areas. it is generally in fair condition. There were no cultural remains encountered on the ground surface at the site. Site 30597 appears to be slightly altered, is in fair condition and net further work is recomrnended . 73 Phca,luzmph of Site 1}596 TU -1 Toga of Layer 11. Looking; Wes#, 74 NW 7 J.A LIP -- ie. 011 iiNn i0rek' rW 4L Oil 14 Figure 32, Photograph of S itc -10596 TIJ - I Tial c of Excavation. I .00k Ing West. 75 I 4X 4, 4r �6 Figure 33. Tlllwop-iph ol'Si[c 30597 Wall %,idl GLI[Ch in BackgrMind. LLWkillLt SWIM. 76 SITE 30595 Wall FUNCTION: r' gric'uliure)Ranching AGE: Pre -Contact L-ra it) Historic Era DIMENSIGN5: 1 10.0 in (.I/S) by 1.30 na by 0.80 m in max. height CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials Sl..'RFACE ARTIFACTS: None F CAVATION: None DF- C'RIPT1ON: Site 30598 is a segment ora rock wall located between 600 and 690 11 amsl in the southern portion of the project area (see Figure 10). There are koo haole and kukui nut trees with Guinea grass ground cover throughout the area. The wall is constructed of piled and stacked angular and subangular basalt small boulders, incorporating small boulders as large as 0.50 in throughout (Figure 34). The wall is roughly faced and is not cobble care filled. The rock wall is approximately 114.0 m long (E/W) where it crosses the project area, by 0.90 in. wide, with a maximum height of 1.30 m. The east terminus of the wall is along the cast property boundary. The wall continues gest beyond the west property boundary. The wall has beim impacted by bulldozing and portions of the wall are lio longer present. 305911 is a pre -Contact era, agricr111rIraal wall or an Historic era ranch wall. and although it is collapsed in some areas, it is micrally in ftur audition. There were no cultural remains encountered on the ground swtacc at the site. No further work is recommended at Site 30598, SITE 30599 platform with Enclosure FUNCTION: Agricultural AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 8.0 m (NW/SE) by 6.50 m by 1,40 m in max, height CONDITION: Fair, Tightly Altered INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Historic glass and metal EXCAVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP -1, SP -2); Test Emit (TU -1) DESCRIPTION: Site 30599 is an enclosed platform located at 670 ft arnsl within the central eastern portion ofthe traject urc't (sce Fii=urc 14). It is situated on a gentle west facing slope 20 meters west cit Site 30502 railroad berm. There are kaa haole trees and Guinea grass grOUnd corer throughout the area. 77 *A., N. WO 74 Al 000 i P @d` g+�u ° Y 4r # w "p _ � �. •+�° �. aP � »�,�`�' ..PaG"' � :mss .'��"' n, 1=r2M-t .;a I'iY::t.: s::lr .01 SILO 10598 4l Lill Uwrv'iww kitikiii.- cSL. 78 Site 30599 is a platform (Feature 1) and a roughly rectangular enclosure (Feature 2) measuring &0 nY long (NW/SE) by 6.50 ai wide (Figure 35). The Featurc I plattbrm is located w the north end of the site and the Feature 2 enclosure extends south from the platform. The feature 1 platform is approximately 2.0 m long (NIS) and 1.8 m wide, with a maximum height of 1.40 ny. It is constructed of angular and subangular hasalt cobbles and stnall boulders stacked three to four courses high (Figure 36). The outer perimeter of the platform is constructed with larger rocks (smell boulder slabs) stacked on their flat sides with their longest edge facing the outer €:dge of the platform. The interior of the platform is constructed of smaller subangular rocks placed inside the larger perimeter rocks. The numb and east sides of the pIatform are well faced. The west side of the platform is collapsed (Figure 37). The feature construction is similar to Historic era rock clearing mounds and platforms, documented in Kana and other places on Hawai' i island. A large water warn cobble, cormgatcd metal roofing, and bottle glass fragments were identified on the Feature 1 platform. The Feature 2 enclosure is rectangular and measured 5.10 rn long (NW/SE) by 4.80 m wide, with a maxii-num height of O.35 nt. Tltc cnclosLirc walN arc constructed of piled small boulders and cobbles, with some roughly stacked, one to iwO courses aide and tmc: to three course high (Figure 38). The enclosure olwnsit) il,c: south. The interior ofthe enclosure is lcvel soil. A screw top jar, a Bakelite poi, bottle glass fragments, and two pieces of sheet metal were encountered on the surface at the site (Figure 39). Two shovel probes and a test -unit (TU --1) were excavated Ott Site 30599 to determine the function and the age of the two features. Shovel Probe Testing Two shovel probes were excavated in the level soil interior of Feature 2. The shovel probes were excavated approximately 4.2 m from one another within the enclosure. They were excavated try depths ranging fiorn 34.0 to 37.0 oohs and terminating on bedrock or large basalt rocks (Table 7). 79 Figure 34: Sits 311-5'99 Plan Vietik Map. 90 u%,;i r Riio k,�. 11 MM I 11K.1 cs1 f i, -ti I FrrR►i 11 1!1"! 41 +Hf VT Fol+, 61 ti 5.1YI'II kll 1 AI 1 till ti 16\%II Q1i11yr111 1%40-46610% 1 I I I I A'91d Figure 34: Sits 311-5'99 Plan Vietik Map. 90 Figure 36: Plmiograpli of Site 10599 i-ca[urE 1 Platform with Top Cleared of Debris Showing Stacked Stone Construction. Looking Wcst_ 81 Hgure 37: Photogmph til" Site 10599 Feature 1 Matforni Showing Wcmt Side Collansc. L-KA-ing East. 82 Figure 38, VIILILL,Lmili�i of ifiv )0-999 FCaLHI-C 2 I:riclOMIL-� 1.00k M" 1-.39. 8- Figure 39_ Photograph of Surface Artifacts Coll---tal _r. tiILe 30599_ 84 Table 8: Site 30599 Shovel Probe Results. SP 4 Depth (cm) Layers BOE Artifacts 1 4 - 34 cin i & it Basalt Rink Glass and nicial fTaurnenrs ? 0 - 17 ern 1& 11 Basalt Rack Donkey shoe. Mass, metal and plastic fragments Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of Layer 1 (4-14 cmbs) loose dark brown (IOYR3I2) fine sandy silt loam overlying Layer 11(14-37 crabs) soft dark yellowish brawn � lt}YR414) time sandy silt. 5P- l contained a single bottle glass fragment, three pane Mass fragments. and four ntstcd mcTal fragments. SP -2 contained a donkey shoe, a single piece amethyst bottle Mass, a piece of plas(ic. and ten rusted metal fragments. three of which are mail fragments. Artifacts recovered from SP- I and SP -2 were not collected, T -U-1 . l-1 was a 1.0 rn by 1.0 m test -unit excavated in the center of the platform l4�ac Figure 35). TU -1 was excavated as IWO natural stratigaphic layers to a maxinium tic,}pill of 1.45 ern below the top surface of the platform and terminated on bedruck (F_I,nll-c 40). Layer 1 (0-90 cmbs) was loose cobbles and small boulders mixed with "0" Horizon organic detritus. A small amount of rusted metal fragments and modern bowl' glass were recovered from Layer 1. Layer U (90-1.45 crnbs) was loose 1DYR314 dark yellowish brown sandy silt, cobbles and small boulders, and loose bedrock slabs. A small amount of rusted .metal. fragments, a metal twist top bottle cap, a wire nail, and modern Grown and clear bottle glass were recovered frorn Layer 11 (see Appendix A). Slabs tit"bedrock were also removed from the base of TCT -1. TU -1 terminated on bedrock (Figure 41). Site 301599 is interpreted as an Historic era to 'Modern era commercial agriculture anti ranching work area. Base on the platfonn canstRIctiun, surface artifacts at the site, and the metal and glass recovered from TU -1. the site lk as likely constructed in the mid 1900s and was likely used for ranching and or comnierci,ii agricultural activities through the 1960s. Site 30595 is slightly altered (1=COtUre I partial collapsc) and is in fair condition. No further work is recommended at Sita 30599. 5 r IF X10 411 611 NO CNN 170- ROCK I.,kN'LR II - I)AkK VEI_[.i)WISEI [3Ro %NN 9IIIN'14 3141 si r Figure 40: Site 30599 TU -I South Profile. M4 Figure 4[: Photogniph of Site 30599 TU -I Base of Excavation Looking East. 87 SITE 30600 Terrace FUNCTION: Agricultural. AGE: Historic Era. DIME-NSIONS: 4.0 m (E!W) by 4.30 rtt by 0.35m in rnax. height CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP -1) DESCRIPTION: Site 30600 is a three -sided terrace located at 660 ft amsl approximately 35.0 meters south of Site 30599 (see Figure 10). It is situated on a gentle west fading slope with koa haole trees and Guinea grass ground cover. The enclosure is constructed of angular and subangular basalt small boulders piled one to tufo courses high. and wide on the ground surface (Figure 43). It is approximately 4.0 m in length (EI) and 3.30 m wide, with a maximurn height ol'O.35 m. There were no artifacts identilictd on the ground surface at the site. Shovel Probe Testing A single shovel probe (SP -1) was excavated within the level soil interior of Site 30600 to determine the Function and age of the terrace. The shovel probe was excavated to a depth of 30.0 embs and terminaied on beds-ock car a large basalt rock. The shovel probe matrix did not contain culiural inaterial. Based on the simple construction of the terrace, its size, and the proportionally large number of Historic era sites recorded an the project area, it is likely that Site 30600 is also an Historic era a&6CUltt1ral terrace. possibly associated with coffee growing. Site 30600 appears 1.0 be unaltered and is in good condition. No further work is recommended at Site 30600. 88 Figure 42. PIi, i.;graph o .'-, [:: 30600 Looking Somhoa 89 SITE 30601 Rock Wall FUNCTION: Rancfidng AGE: Historic Fara. DIMENSIONS: 80.0 ani (NWiSE) by 1.2.0 m by L50 m in nmx. height CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: None DESCRIPTION: Site 306011 is an I listoric era wall. bated between 635 and 685 ft amsl within the northern portion oi' Lhe project area (see Figure 10). The wall is oriented nacankalw akai and is situated 10 meters north of and parallel to the Site 30595 wall (Figure 43). There are kukui nut and k.oa haole trees, and Guinea grass ground cover throughout the area. The wall bisects the property east to west, and is attached to the Site F2 railroad br-rrn to the cast. The wall continues west beyond the west project area boundary (see Figure 10). The wall is approxi.matcly 80.0 m its long (EfW) where it crosses the project area by 1.20 m wide, with a maximum height of 1.50 m. It is constructed of stacked angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders (Figure 44). The wall is bifaced Lind cobble core filled and is stacked rip to seven courses high in some areas. A portion of the wall to the cast, approximatcly 12.1 n7, constitutes the northern bourdary of the Site 30602 enclosure. There are sections of the wall which are reinforced with p1" and barbed wire fencing attached to T posts. Site 30601 is an Historic era raneh wall, appears to be unaltered, and is in gond condition. No further work is recommended at Site 3 060 1. SITE 30602 Enclosure FUNCTION, Ranching/Agricultural AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 23.0 m (E1W) by 16.0 m by 2. 10 m in max. height CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Locution and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: l listckric era bottle EXCAVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP -1, SP -2. SP -3, SP -4) DESCRIPTION: Site 30602 is an enclosure located between 680 and 6135 ft aims] within the northeastern portion of the project arca (see. Figure 10).. it is situated on a 90 4.11F3h4°+' 1i 111 Jk141I"r N1 /S'�' i �,Irr ',WF;' al.�I I 0 SIIL 31F silt: -14" 1 "►BALL N%A1.1. * 0 0 a 6 ` hri a r a �I{i i� r l 1 r� l 6'ISI hk1l — 111 r11a�1! r� 151L4 hli.11 I I I 11 41111 h Figure 43: Site 30602 Platy Vlev, Map Showing Poltlons oi'Slte 37592. Site 30595. and Site 30601. 91. F-igurtd4: PIIOLOgrjp<LUl'SILL'Do6UIRack Wa1iLocking N,•iIlf_ 92 gentle rnaankalinaakcai Slope, within close proximity to the eassteni project area boundary. Them are k-oa ha ole trees with guinea grass ground cover throughout the area. The enclosure is formed by utilizing and modifying several existing walls (see Figure 43). 1t is bounded to the east by a 16.0 nt section of Site 30592 railroad herrn, to the north by a 21.0 m section of Site 30601 wall, to the south by a 2.3.0 m section of Site 30595 wall (figure 45) and to the west by a wall which spans the distance k 1ween Site 30601 and Site 30595. aipproxima(ely 10.0 m. The Site 30602 wall is constructed of stacked angular and sobartgular basalt cobbles an(] small boulders. The western boundary wall of the enclosure varies in condition from good to almost nonexistent, with only the southernmost portion of the wall remaining. The intact wall segment is approximately 3.30 m in length and 0.90 m wide, with a maximum height of 1.30 nn. Thea is a aqua colored bottle at the top of the wall segment (Figure 46). All ether portions of the Site 30602 west wall have been altered to varying degrees. The mid section is completely gone with the exception of a few rocks, two of which remain in place. A section of Site 30595 wall has been removed to create an entrance to Sitc 30602 enclosure interior. Exposed bedrock is visible within in the northeastern portion of the enclosure interior, encompassing approximately one third of the total area. There is a section of galvanized pipe near the base of Site 30552 railroad berm. There is loose rock from collapsed portions of wall. which lie within the interior. The Site 305942 railroad barn portion of the enclosure to the cast predates the ether walls that form (lie enclosure and the western enclosure boundary wall is the most recently constructed, Shovel Probe Testing A line of four shovel probes spaced roughly 3.0 meters apart were excavated within the level soil interior of the enclosure. The shovel probe line extended from the southwest earner, toward the northeast corner, terntiriating iliiciway A a bedrock outcrop. The shovel probes were excavated to depths ranging from 27.1 to 60.0 crabs and terminated on bedrock or large basalt racks (Table 9). 93 cm AL N7, rt —.o fA I I L(I -, 4 .: P11; -1 m ---i ii-Fh ol'SiLe 30602 West Wall (Left)and Site 30595 Wall (Right) Looking East. 94 Figure 46: Photograph of Site 30602 Enclosuure Wall and Bottle. 95 9 � !C uf: 1 4 Figure 46: Photograph of Site 30602 Enclosuure Wall and Bottle. 95 Table 9: Sits 30602 Shovel Probe Results. SP4 Depth (cm) Layers BOE Artifacts l 0 - 60 cm 1. 11.111 Basalt Rock Kukffi NcII S11e11 2 0 - 60 em 1. 11,111 Basalt Rock Ar kui Nut ShOl 3 0 - 47 em 1, 11,111 Basalt Rock _ 4 0 - 27 em 1 & 11 Basalt Bedrock - Two of the four shovel probes contained unburned kuktrr nett shell. leo other cILltural material was rccovered from the shovel probes. There were no cultural retrtaitas encountered can the ground surface at the site, with the exception of the battle and the sectWIII ofgalvanircd pipe_ Bused on the construction style and the fact that the feature is constructed onto the Site 30592 railroad berm, Site 30602 is interpreted as an Historic era enclosure associated with ranching and commercial agriculture. The feature wall is partially collapsed and is in fair condition. Net further work is rc:commcnticd at Site 30602. SITE 30603 Enclosure FUNCTION Ramehing/Agdcul rural AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 35.0 m (NE/SW.) by 24.0 m by 1.45 iia in hoax. height CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY, Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS. None EXCAVATION- Shovel Probe Testing {SP -1, SP -21 DESCRIPTION: Site 30603 is an L -shape enclosure 0"Caturc 1)'111d three linear terraces (Feature 2, 3; and 4) located between 680 and W 1't anisl icttmcdiately west of Site 306{)2 (see Figure 1{}. IL is sitcEated on rt gentle west 1<teinLr slope among kna wale trees with Guinea grass ground cover. The L -shape enclosure is constnic•ted unto the south side of the Site 30595 rock wall and is approximately 35.0 rn long (WE/SW) by 24.0 m wide (Fiectre 47). The enclosure walls etre roughly 66.0 in long by 1.0 m wide with. Lt RILIXIMUin height of 1.45 rn. The walls are constructed of stacked angular and subangular basak cobbles and sntall boulders and is bifaced and cobble core filled (Figures 48. 49, and 50). 96 — ---------------------------------------------------------- - e'lPIP9 .WIL fin I 312 �\�\\\. % FEAYURE I 1120 111ol SITE 30545 NkALL KEV ro-1 Rte l% F- ,t NIULL FF 11 - HFIC11T �novr c.Rot-Nn i% cm Rl I'M I Figure 47: SRe $0603 Man View Map. 97 Hi}!urr 48. 1'I�,rli7 r��t!Y „1 4L� .'il+.�Y-; 4,�Y�liu�ti� i"t�rnerU�'k:n�lc,;ur� F�aeeY,re 1. Lot�kinE I iornlmcst. 9X FivurrX9. PIItiL0'- j,!1 01 SRe,30603 WesLem South Wall Of HICI0Sue! 1-eature° 1. LookingSoulhwi,-�t 99 Figure 50: Photograph of Site 30603 Middle Corner of Enclosure Feature I , Looking South. 100 A roughly 35.0 m segment of the 5ile 30595 rock wall forms the north boundary of the enclosure ( Figure 51). The eastern enclosure wall sc prtent is approximately 24.0 m Long (N1' /SW),Md is mosily collapsed. Portions of the southern and western gall segments have also collapsed, although the easternmost seginent of the southern wall is still intact. There are three linear agricultural terraces (Features 2..3, and 4) within the southeast corner of the enclosure (Figure 52 and Figure 53). The terraces are oriented NW/SE within the rocky soil interior of the enclosure. Feature ? is furthest makui (west) and Feature 4 is furthest rxrr uka (east),. The Feature 2 retaining wall is approximately 4.0 in in length and 1.0 m wide, with a maximum height of 0.60 m. The Feature 3 retaining wall is approximately 6.0 m in length and O3 50 ni wido, with a niaxin1LLI11 height of 0.60 m. The FeatUre 4 retaining wall is a more substantial construct than the othcrs. It is approximately TO m in length and 1.0 m wide, with a inaximuin height Lai"0.90 m. No crIltural 111atertal 1k as identified on the ground surface at the site. Shovel Probe Testing Two shovel probes were excavated within the level soil surfaces ofterraces Feature 2 (SP- I) artd feature 3 (SP -2) rca determine F'unetloii and ,age. The shovel prays were excavated approximately 4.0 nt apart, were dug to depths ranging :from 30.0 to 36.0 cmbs, and terminated on bedrock or large basalt rocks jable 9). Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of Layer 1 (0-13 crabs) loose dark brawn (IOYR3/2) fine sandy silt loam overlying Layer ll (13-36 cmbs) soft dark yellowish brown (10YR4/4) Fine sandy silt. A small amount of unburned kukW nut shell was recovered from SP -2. Table 10: Site 30603 Shovel Probe Results. SP# Depth (em) Lavers BOE Artifacts 1 0 - 30 c,l'l 1 & H Basali Rack - ? 0 - 0 ern I& II Bat alt Rack AW -vi Nut Shell 101 Fi£i rc 5I : T'hiF<< pp ip7 i of tiiiw 7{ 5ii5 Wall Tloriion «1 Site 30603 Enclosure Feature 1, Looking North. 102 Figju•c 53: P[mograph Pf'Site 30603 Feature _2 Tormco (CcincO and Feature Retaining Wall (Left), Looking Southeast. 104 Based on (lie cunstruction style of the enclosure and the fact that the enclosure Malls arc constructed onto the Site 30595 wall, and the Site 30595 wall is constructed onto the Site 30592 railroad bern7, Site 30603 is interpreted as an Historic era enclosure associated with agriculture and ranching. Site 30003 has been impactcd by modern land clearing activities and is in hair condition. No further work is recommended at Site 30603. SITE 30604 Agricultural Complex FUNCTION: Agricultural AGE: Pre -Contact Era to Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 12.0 nt (NW/SE) by 5.0 m CON -D TION: Fair INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: None F.XC,AVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP -I ) DESCRPT'ION: Sitc 30604 is an agricultural complex located at 675 ft a.msl 2.0 meters south of Site 3{16021 (see Figure 10). It is situated on a =mile west facing slope with kora haole Irces and Guinea grass ground cover throughout the area. Site 30604 is a planting feature (Feature 1) and three terraces (Features 2, 3, and Feature 4) (Figure 54). Feature 1 is a possible oval planting feature located in the southeast corner of the site. It is constructed ol'angular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled one to two courses high and two to three courses wide on the ground surface (Figure 55). The feature is a ipproxirrtately 2.50 m in length (E/W) and 2.10 rn wide, with a ma imurn height of 0.60 m. There were no cultural remains on the ground surface at Feature 1. Future 2 is a sfnall two-sided terrace located along the northwest edge of Feature 1. The terrace is 2.70 long (NWiSE) by 1.5 m wide. The terrace retaining wall is 2.70 rn long by 0.60 m wide and is 0,62 m in maximum height above the ground surface to the southwest. It is constructed of basalt cobbles and small boulders piled up to three courses high on the ground surface (Figure 56). There were no Cultural remains on the ground surface at Feature 2. 105 � f J11" Q it if d 'e-'. .1 ff lei C� SITF 3Olt 4 M4141 1• F i l I r ,�• � � I err i AL u d + tiik it Fi• 14 3� F+tr1� Z- 41.OPF; Figure 54: Site 30604 Plan View Map. 106 Figtu•+e 55: Photograph of Site 30604 Feature 1 Looking Southwest. 107 Figure 56: i3I1i1 tl p-aph oI SIt4, 306W Fcaturti: 2 Looking Southeast. 103 Feature 3 is a linear terrace located along the northwest side of Feature 2. The terrace is 4.80 long (NWI'SE) by 3.61 m wide. The terrace retaining wall is 2.70 m long by 1.0 in �,%ide and is 0.85 m in maximum height above the ground surlace to 11te soutltwest. It is constructed of basalt cobbles and sinall boulders piled up to three courses high on the ground surface (Figure 57). A section of galvanized pipe is situated along the easteminost portion of the terrace. There were no cultural remains identified at Feawre 3. Shoved probe Tektin A shovel prof?c (SP -1) was excavated within the level soil of the Feature 3 terrace to determine function and age. SP -1 was excavated to a depth of 50.O curbs and. terminated on bedrock or a large basalt rock. Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of threat r►aturaI strat i graph i c layers: Layer I (0-14 crabs) loose dark brown ( I OYR3/2) fine sandy :silt loam, Layer 11 (14-41 ernbs) soft brown (IOYR4/3) sandy silt, and Layer III (41-50 crnbs) sots dark yellowish brawn (10YR4/4) fine sandy silt. A railroad spike, a wire nail, and a volcanic -glass flake were recovered from SP -I (Figure 58). The volcanic-ghiss flake: was collected and the outer artifacts were left at the site. Feature 4 is a two-sided terrace located along the north edge of Feature 1. The wi-race is approximately 2.25 In long (NE/SW.) by 2.0 m wide, and is 0.80 m to maxrtnutm hoighi. It is constructed of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled on the ground surtace (Figure 59). There is single strand wire within the western portion of the site. 1t is possible that Site 30604 is a pre -Contact to early past -Contact era agricultural site. The single volcanic -glass flake suggests that arca might have been used for agricultural and resource gathering. However. the proximity of Site 306()4 to Site 30602 and the presence of the railroad spike and wire trail suggest that Site 30604 was definitely used during the Historic era. It is very likely that Site 30604 was an Historic era agricultural site associated with sugarcane or coffee growing. 109 Figure 57: Photograph of Site 30604 Feature 3 Looking Southeast. 114 II� Figure 5S: PhoLo rrc ph of Art ifacts Recovered from Siie 30604 . Featuru J. SP -I w I Fj,�Lwc 59: Lit S lk: -ION k! SITE 30605 Rack Wall FUNCTION: Ranching AGE: Historic Era. DIME-NSIONS: 90E m (E!W) by 0.75 in by 1.0 m in max. height CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: None DESCRIPTION: Site 30605 is an Historic era wall. located between 600 and 685 ft amsl through the center of'the project area (see. Figurc 10). The wall trends naaukralmakai across the west facing slope. There are karkui nut and kora tamale trees with Guinea grass ground ever throughout the area. The well bisects the property east to west, terminating to the east near the Site 30592 railroad berm and continuing to the west beyond the project area boundary. The will is constructed of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and sinall boulders, incorporating some as large as 0.50 m (Figure 60). The wall is approximately 901.0 m lung (E/W) where it crosses the project area by 0.75 m wide, with a maximum height of 1.0 m. It is a bifaced, cobble cote filled wall and is stacked up to five courses in height. The condition of the wall ChMiTliShes near its western temiin as where it has collapsed. There were no cultural rcniairi,�; cricountered within the area of the site. Site 3060,5 has been impacted by modem land clearing activities, is partially collapsed in places, and is in good condition. No further work is recommended for Site 30605. 113 figure 60: Photo ph of Silo 10605 Wal I I .00king Northeast, SITE 30606 Rack Wall FUNCTION: Ranching/Agricultural. AGE: Pre -Contact to Historic Era DIME-NSIONS: 37.0 m (NW/SE) by 1.90 m by 1.30 m in nmx. height CONDITION: Poor INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: Nene DESCRIPT[ON: Site 30600 is an I listoric era wall segment located at 620 ft anisl within the 4oulhwesteni Pnrlia}n of the project arca (see Figure 10). The wall trends northwestisouthcast and is situated in an area with kou haole trees and Guinea grass ground cover. The Site 30600 rock wall seg=,rit is located between the Site 300505 wall and the Site 30597 wall, and is less forinally constructed than either of the two (Figure 61). The wall is approximately 37.0 m in length (NW/SE) and 1.90, rn wide, with a maximum height of L.30 m. Site 30606 is presently a rubble wall consisting of angular and stab angular basalt cobbles piled three to six courses high uid three to four courses wide on the ground surface. There ks no formal stacking or 1acin{4 c".ident to the wall constrLlNiOri, though it might have leen a stacked ;!-k h cod wall that has been disturbed by triodcrn land clearing activities. The majority of the; western. (downhill) portions of the wall have collapsed, with an increase in collapse in low lying areas, Thcrc were no cultural remains identified on the ground surface at the site. Site 30606 is an Historic era rack wall associated with ranching. It has been altered by modem land clearing, is mostly collapsed, and is in poor condition. 115 Figure 6l: Photograph oi_ Site Y006 Rock Wall. Looking Forth. 116 SITE 30647 Agricultural Complex FUNCTION: Agriculture AGE: Pre -Contact Era it) Historic Era DIME-NSIONS: 55.0 to (WISE.) by 27.5 CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP -1 through SP -l0) DESCRIPTION: Site 30607 is an agTICI Ural complex located between 620 and 630 R amsl within the southwestern portion of the project area, on a steep west facing slope (see Figure 10). There are kora h axle trees with Guinea grass ground cover throughout the area. The Site 30607 agricultural complex includes seven terraces (FeattLVe I throrrg;h Feature 7) located north of wall Site 30597, south of wall Site 30605, west of wall Site 30598 and on bath sides of wall Site 30606 (Figure 62). Feature 1 is a three -sided ferrate located in the northeast corner of the site. The terrace retaining wall is constructed primarily of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled up to four courses in high (Figure 63). it is apprcymmatcly 3,70 m in length (N/S) by 1,40 m wide, with a maximum height of 1.05 m. There is no formal stacking or facing in the feature constmctiart. There were rlo cultural remains on the izround sur6ce at Feature 1. Shovel Probe Testing A shovel probe (SP -1) was excavated within the sloping soil interior of Feature I to determine function and age. The shovel probe was excw ated to a depth of 37.0 a mbs and terrttinated on bedrock or a large basalt rock. SP- l stratigraphy was Layer 1 (0-16 crnbs) loose dark brawn 410YR312) lute sandy silt loam overlying Layer 11(16-37 cmbs) soft dark yellowish brawn (l OYR414) fine sandy silL SP -I contained a total of five volcanic -glass fragments and several charcoal fragments. Feature 2 is a throe -sided terrace located within the central western portion of Site 30607. The terrace is situated on a west facing slope and is constructed along the west side of wall Site 34606. The nurihwest and southwest comic n.; cel` the terrace are curved and the terrace retaining walls are constructed of angular grid stibangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled on the ground surface (Figure 64). There is no formal stacking 11.7 FF ATI RF -3 wl'-1tY til" -i A,4 wl I I' 1661N. M ASI I w1 I F }l IRrA? 1t \ 1.1 Cit 1.C -1{o Figure 62, Site 30607 Plan View Map. 118 SITE: 311612 1. AVA i'L EIF S I I V 3111,59111 WAL1. 1) lip 1 20 Lill c, i Y ®^ 1l%Itil I flirt hr F] T 14fiCl.6 ®- til"t�MF e—i I %%t1'1,H1 Ibl 111 111M IN 4®r 1,1l V11' til RtAt f ® w111A F"], PROW FlguivW: Photograph of Site )06(17 Vcauirc I I �71: I LL7 I .,v k -ii., t% is I. an Figtre 64: Photograph of Site 30647 Feature Terrace (Backgrounds and. Site 30-5956 Wall (Foreground), Looking West. 120 or lacing 4fvident in the 6eature construction. The terrace is approximately 10.0 m in length (E/W) and 6.0 in wide, with a maximum height of 1.10 rn. There are large quantities of rock within the soil arca of the terrace. Piled rock combined with rack which has collapsed from surrounding areas (Site 30606 rubble wall and elsewhere) is approximately 1. 10 m in height and 2.10 m wide, dividing the surface of the terrace to farm two areas. The westernmost area is approximately 7.5 in in length (EIW) and 5.5 m wide (Fi-.urc 65). The easterninot o area is tan enclosed area formed by rock lailcd on the surface of the terrace where it ahLlt.'; Sitc '0006 (Figure 66). The enclosed area is approximately 5-0 Til in length (N/Si and 2.5 rn wide. There were no cultural remains at Feature ?. Shovel. Probe Testing Two shovel probes (5P-2 .and SP -3) were excavated within the level soil interior of Feature 2 to determine feature function and age. The shovel pr€rbcs were excavated approximately 4.5 m from one another, within the western area (SP -2) and the eastern area (SP -3). The shovel probes were excavated to depths ranging from 34.0 to 43.0 cmbs and terminated on bedrock or large basalt rocks. (Table 10). Shovel probe stratigraphy consi tcd ofthrc c natural straligraphic laver~: Layer 1(0-16 cmbs) loose dark brown (10YR3/2) fine sandy silt loam, Layer I I t 16-37 cmbs) soft brown ( I OYR413) sandy silt, and Layer 111 (37-4.3 cmbs) seal darn, yellow -IA brown ( IOYR4/4) rine sandy silt. The shovel probes did not contain cultural material. Table 11: Site 30607 Feature 7 Shovel Probe Rcsults. SP# Depth (CM) Layers BOE Artl%cts 2 0 - 43 cin 1. 11. 111 Basalt Rock - 3 0 - 34 cin I &- 11 Basalt Rock Feature 3 is three -sided terrace located north of Feature 2. The terrace is situated on a west facing slope and is constructed along the west side of wall Site 30616. The northwest and southwest earners oaf the terrace are curved and the terrace retaining walls arc constructed of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled on the ground su.rfhce. (Figure 67). There is nca formal stacking or facing evident in the feature construction. Feature 3 is approximately 7.5 m in length (NIS) and 7.0 m wide, with a maximum height of'O.60 m. The western portion of the terrace retaining wall is mostly collapsed, There were no cultural remains at Feature 3. 121 Fig -art 65: Photograph ol'Site 30M)7. 1 <<suirc —7. 1' `k I'-'! L 1,4:01,11121 LUSL. 122 �,. 2 lf' ` i Tit �T k �`. � y- �r ., r �q, M� �: �" � � ..�. x ,. �.. fi- i 7 � i � ..e �r .�. .• ��, ., � -.. .� �. .. � - e�I �.. , �� � .� „.., r v;a ., � „� �a .,.n ��� ; d �� � ��, 't � ._ � irr o, . I .. :'� .. ,��_ �� x '�"'n,m ���W R4;, '..H�y �"b a4,. yam. 5 r � w: q 3 O w P "�,, � we �� " "��o �� tii a/ �. " 1„�' L� �u w' i N d5 �' e � '.•x,��M � � t v ^. T p�1b+JIY'.f A t'i*� � r u9�r �� M /il' r � �I � s �a ,� �. � w. � r � � R �r ��f a ;."t, � , .- _ � �� a � � �� � i w . Iy • t�, � N¢ F i. a . .. mti .S R ; �, ,., � - ,� , .. ,, y � r �w , -, ^? y +� �� �� _ � �['� J .. � ; ,4.. r � .t ., y , .. _. - ..- _ - k T � � l" �. P ' � � � y�p+ y X ... �.•w ��w may; � �N �" y , .�, •' � �. �� Shovel Probe Testinu Two shovel probes (SP -4 aria SP -5) were excavated within the level sail interior of feature 3. 7 -lie shovel probes were exca,, ated approximately 2.5 m from one another. The shovel probes were excavated to depths ranging from 48.0 to 54.0 embs and terminated an bedrock or large basalt racks (Table 11). Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of three natural stratigraphic layers: Layer 1(0-14 cinbs) loose dark brawn ( IOYR312) fine sandy silt loam, Layer IT (14-38 curbs) soft brown ( I OYR413) sandy silt, and Layer 11.1 (38-54 cmbs) soft dark yellowish brown( I OYR414) fine sandy silt. SP -4 contained two vnlcan ic glass IlakGs recovered between 0-15 curbs, and small charcoal fragments recovered between 15-30 embs. SP -5 contained several very snnall charcoal fragments that were not collected. Table 12: Site 30607 Feature 3 Shovel Probe Resrilts. SP# Depth (cm) Layers BOE Artifacts 4 0 - 54 cm t, IT, III t asalr Rock ValL�.LniC �,14is , Cliarcoul FrtL_�411ilen1.; 5 ii - 4� era, I, 11, 111 t zr alt Rock Cliarcoal Fragments Feature 4 is a two-sided terrace located along the south edge of Feature 2. The terrace abuts the west edge of wall Site 301606. !t is approximately 10.0 rn in length (EJW) and 6.5 m wide, with a maximum Height. of 0.94 m. The terrace retaining wall its constructed of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled on the gOOLInd surface (see Figure 62). `here is no formal stacking, or facing evident in the feature construction. There is ailed rock near the center of the terrace that di6des the surface of the terrace into two areas. The easternmost area is enclosed by rode piled near the center of the terrace and by wall Site 30606 (Figure 68). The enclosed area is approximately 5.5 m in length (N/S) and 2.5 m wide. The westernmost portion is approximately 7.5 m in Length (E[W) and 5.0 m wide (Figure 69). The south edge of the terrace is partially collapsed. There were no cultural remains at Feature 4. Shovel Probe Teslia Two shovel prole, (SP -6 and 5P-7) were excavated "21 -thin Site 30607 Feature 4 to determine feature function and age. The shovel probes were excavated approximately 4.5 rn from one another within the eastern area (SP -6) and the western area (SP -7). The shovel probes were excavated to depths ranging from 3 2.0 ti) 55.0 cmbs and terminated. on bedrock or large basalt racks (Table 12). 125 ligure 68: Photograph of Site 30607 Feature 4 Eastem Area Looking North_ 126 a x w • ,d ..M'" .�k, �-y ". E 1 .-� ��j ` _ err y ti Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of three natural stratigraphic lavers: Layer I (0-12 creeps) loose Clark brown (10Y1t312) tine sandy silt [oat -n, Layer U (12-35 cirtbs) soft. brown (10YR4/3) sandy silt. and L:t�,er lel (38-55 crabs) soft dark yellowish brawn (10YR4/4) fine sandy silt. P-7 contained a single fragtrtent of dense crystalline basalt, possibly an unpolished exterior flake. Table 13: Site 30607 Feature 4 Shovel Probe ResUlt:.s. SP# Depth (erre) Lavers ROE Artifacts 6 0 - 35 aero I, It, Ill Basalt Cock - 7 0 -32 cot I fir. II Basali Rock 3&,alt Dehitage Feature 5 is a three -sided terrace located in the southeast corner of Site 30607 (see Figure 62). The terrace is approximately 7-5 m in. length (N/S) and 3.0 m wide, with a maximurn height of 1.20 m. The terrace retaining wall is constructed of angular and. subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled on the ground surface (Figure 70), There is no formal stacking or facing evident in thy: feature construction. The west terrace retaining mall is collapsed. potentially brought about by Aoa hoole tree growth, as well as the steepness of the slope. There were no cultural remains on the ground surface at Feature 5. Shovel Prone Testing A shovel probe (SP -8) was excavated within the level soil interior of Feature 5. The shovel probe was excavated to a depth of 30.0 crabs and terminated on bedrock or a large basalt rock. SP -8 contained several very small charcoal fragments which were not collected. Feature 6 is a three -sided terrace located east of Feature 2 and Feature 4 (see Figure 62). The terrace retaining wall is angled, situated cross -slope and constructed of angular and subangular basalt boulders piled on the ground surface (Figure 71). The terrace is approximately 7.6 m in length (NW/SE) by 3.5 rat wide, with a maximum height of 1.20 rn. Portions of the retaining wall to the east ere collapsed. There were no cultural remains identified on the ground surface at Future 6. 128 ti Aw r .. _ ' w ,004AA r. jr n . m v� is ° �' � e a _�� .-, � a ,�.. :" � �r .. �"' •�dn..H , W I SOW; FigiEre 70: Photogmph of Site 30607 Feature 5 Looking South, 129 Tr sr. AWN& - 4 Ok , IV , kv PL Nor HWirt 71: Plww),,,mph il I'S -I L- ally I:' ° -:i I i iv ±; I (n I I, I I I <, L,.,) I II II Shovel Probe Testinu A. single shox el probe (SP -9) was excavated within the level soil interior of Feature 6. The shop ,el prole was excavated to a depth of 33.0 embs and terminated on bedrock ora largebasalt rack. Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of Layer I (0-13 cinbs) loose dark brown (IOYR312) fine sandy silt loam overlying Layer 11 (13-33 dribs) soft dirk yellowish brown (IOYR4{4) fine sandy silt. SP -9 dict not contain cultural. material. Site 30607 Feature 7 is a three -sided terraQe located west of Feature I (see Figure 621). The lei -race is situated cross -slope and is constructed of piled angular and subangular basalt boulders piled on the ground surface (Figure 72). There is no forma[ stacking Or facing evident in feature construction, The terrace is 8.60 m in length (NW/SE) by 2.90 in wide, with a inaximuin height of 0.60 m. There were no cultural remains on the ground surl;ace within the area of Feature 7. Shovel Probe Testing A single shovel probe (SP -10) was excavated within the level soil interior of Feature 10. The shove probe was excavated to a depth of 3 7. 0 dubs and terminated on bedrock or a large basalt rock, Shovel probe stratigrraphy consisted of Layer 1(0-1.4 curbs) loose dark brawn ( I OY 10/2) line sandy silt loam ovci lying Layer 11 (14-37 embs) soft dark yellowish brown i I tl` R4!4) fine sandy silt. SP -10 contained a single volcanic glass flake and Five marine shcII Ir-agments which were recovered from 0-15 dubs. Site 34607 Summary Sites 30598 (low piled wall), 30606, (low piled wall), and 30607 (agricultural complex) are all likely components of a single agricultural complex. This interpretation is based on their proximity to each other, their feature construction technique. and the fact that three of the Site 30607 terraces are constructed along the west side of the Site 30606 wall. In addition, it is very likely that the Site 306012 lava blister is also associated with these three sites. The small amount of traditional cultural material recovered from subsurface testing at Site 30607 is typical of traditional pre -Contact to early past -Contact era agricultural features. However, it might be that the artifacts are not directly associated with these features;, and that they are related to resource collection prior to the construction of the features, 131 ti "l, ' �m 10 7IML w. All r a" ., " � Y WP, ,�,,y� ,.tri""f � � .ti��F .�,� �t ��`�' ✓ i, � �, r� ' If N *y q. .. � � �' • ter' �" „ qtr '. t 1' • � X�!�, + . n N Figorc72: Photograph of %7,i:. ;: r r� r Looking North. 132 The terrace fedtllFtS themselves are somewhat similar to Kona field System features recorded at pre)jtct-s in the general area of the current project. They differ in that they are more roughly constmeted. This might be a function of the available rock in this location—the rock is much larger than that Bund in other places. However, it seems just as likely, or more likely, that the features were constructed in the Historic era for commercial agriculture. Their somewhat rough and hasty construction is similar to other Historic era agricultural features, most notably coffee terraces, documented at nearby project area. In addition, the presence of the Historic era refuse dump at nearby Site 30612 further suggests the agricultural complex is an I listoric: era site. Site 30607 has been altered by ground clearing actMties, the features are partially collapsed in places, and the site is in fair condition. No further work is recommended at Site 30607. SITE 30608 Enclosure FUNCTION: TempoT-ary Clwelll'ng and Storage AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 7.5 m (NiS) by 3.3 in by 1.20 m in max. height CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: None DESCI2JPTIOM Site 30608 is a rectangular enclosure located at 670 ft amsl within the southeastern porlion of the project area, roughly 15.0 m west of the Site 30592 railroad berm (see figure lU). It is situated on a moderate west facing slope in an area of A -aa haole trees and Guinen grass ground cover. The enclosure is rectangular and is constructed of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders, some of which are as large as 0.80 m (Figure 73), The wall is bifaced and cobble core filled. It is approximately 7.50 in in length (NIS) and 3.30 in wide, with a maximum height. of 1.20 m.. Portions of the walls to the north and southwest have collapsed, suggesting that the enclosure inight have been impacted by heavy equipment. 133 Figure 73. Pllot{rgmph of Sits: 3{}608 l .1 closure J..0011iil4: `.t IMiLLINI. 134 It is possible that the enclosure was constructed by modifying a wall segment just west of the Sitc 30592 railroad berm wall. Docks might have been removed from t}1e ends of the wall io construct two walls (north and south walls) between the Mall segment and the railroad berm to the east. The east wall of the enclosure is the railroad berm wall. There is single strand heavy gauge fencing wire within the interior of the feature. Based on construction method and proximity to the railroad berm, it is most likely that Site 306081s the remains of an Historic era structure. The enclosure has been altered by modern land clearing activities and is in fair condition. SITE 30609 Enclosure FUNCTION, Temporary Dwelling and Storage AGE: Historic Era DIMENSION& 6.6m (NIS) by 4.5 m by 1.20 m in max. height CONDITION., C Cod INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Norte EXCAVATION: None D SCRWTION: Site 30609 is a rectangular enclosure Ideated at 680 ft amsl approximately 14-0 nicwrs rtortlw-ast of Site 30609 (see Figure 10). It is tiituated on a moderate west lacing slope close to the eastern project area boundary rand just gest of the Site 30592 railroad berm. There are A-oa haole trees and Gimiea glass ground corer throug.bout tate area. The enclo%ure is rectangular and is constructed ofan��rilar and subangular basalt boulders. some of which are as large as 1.05 m (Figure 74 and Figure 75). The wall is bifaced and cobble core filled. Itis approximately 6.60 m In leu-th (iNiS) and 4.5 m wide, with a maximum height of 1.20 m. It is possible that the enclosure was constructed by modifying a wall scginent ,just west of the Site 30592 railroad berm wall. Rodes might have been removed from the enols of the wall to consttztct two walls (north and south walls) between the wa l scgnnent and the railroad berm to the east. The east wall of the enclosure is the railroad berm wall. Portions of the walls to the cast have collapsed, indicating that this structure may have been impacted by heavy egUipment. Site 30609 is approximately 14.0 to northeast of Site 30608, and is similar in construction. A single strand of heavy gauge fencing wire 135 was found in the interior of this feature also. Based on construction method and proximity to the railroad berm, it is mast likely that Site 30609is the remains of an Historic era structure. The enclosure has been altered by modem land clearing activities and is in fair condition_ SITE 30616 Terrace FUNCTION: Aq,YiCu1Lural AGE: Pre -Contact Errs Historic Era DIM [ N S IONS: 6.75 m (NMS E) by 3.0 m by 0.40 m in inax, height CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACF ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP-1) DESCRIPTION: Site 38610 is a three -sided terrace located aL 675 tt atml within the southeaster portion of the propcct area (see Figure 10). The site is situated on a west facing slope, to the southwest and cloven stupe of Site 30505, within close proximity to the eastern project area boundary. There are kou hunle trees and Guinea grass ground cover throughout the area. The terrace is approximately 6.75 m long (N /SE) by 3.4 m wide, with a maximum height of G,40 m (Figur%: 76). The interior soil surface of the terrace slopes slightly to the west. The terrace retaining wall is constructed of piled angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders, some as large as 0.45 m (Figure 77). Portions of the retaining wall to tllc southws cst may have been remo cd by modern land clearing activities. There were no Cltltural remains encountered on ilie surface in the area of the terrace. Shovel Probe Testing A single shovel probe (SP -1) was excavated within the soil Filled interior of Site 30610. The shovel probe was excavated to a depth of 22.0 %labs and terminated on bedrock Ear a large basalt rock. Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of Layer i ( 0-1 curbs) loose dark brown (I OYR3!2) fine sandy silt loam overlying Layer II (1.3-22 cinbs) soft dark yellowish brown (10YR414) tine sandy silt.. SP -1 contained several eery small fxag". tints of charcoal which wwcre not collected. 136 m i' --H ! L -#: PhoLQgL-.tp!l Qf SiLe 30609 Li:tiIij,,Lwe Looking LUSL. 137 r - e,.4 � _ "VNF"„' rte• • y� Sy. r., • Y4t. IFNI r ,Rye R r -WA , 1 � s Fiµure 7+: Photogmph ut Site '1609 Lnclosurc Looking Northeast. 139 A- Il til 100 1511 21PI t sn K F. Y U- HAS %1.1 WA itti - s L 0 p r F- RFDROCK - FALLEN TREE I 1 - 11E I(AJT IN cm ABOVE SURFACL Figure 76: S'Ite 30610 Plan View Map. 119 Hgure 77: 1 1mtog-mRh of Site )061 i -I crracc l.tirokjjoir SlI[LEI ll4,4`t- BEE SITE 30611 Agricultural Complex FUNCTION: Agriculture AGE: }-Historic Era DIME-NSIONS: 10.0 ni (N/5) by 7.b rn CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: Shovel Probe Testing (SP -1, SP -2, and SP -3) DESCRHPTION: Site 30611 is an agricultural complex located at 670 f1 ams] in the southeast portion of the project area (see Figure 10). The site is three terraces (Features, 1, 2, and 3) situated on a west facing slope in an area of koa haole and kuki nut trees with Guinea grass ground cover. Fea(ure I is located at the northeast end of the site and is a rOUghly rectinutar coil lillcd terrace approximately 6J rte long (NW/SE) by 2.0 m wide, with a anaxianurn height of 1.0 in along southwest edge (Figure 75). The terrace regaining wall is constructed of piled angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders, some as large as 0.90 rn (figure 79). There is no formal stacking or facing evident in the feature construction, The northern portion of the terrace has collapsed in several rarou. The southern portion is better preserved, where several large somewhat tabidar boLlIders have been incorporated into the construetion. Tlicre �,%-ert no cultural remains identified at Feature 1. Shovel Probe Tcstitt A shovel probe (SP -1) was excavated within the level soil interior of Feature 1. The shovel probe was excavated to a depth of 29.0 umbs and temainated on bedrock or a large basalt mete. Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of Layer I (0-13 curbs) louse dark brown (10YRK2) fine sandy sill loam overlying Layer II (13-29 embs) soft dark yellowish brown (10YR4/4) fine sandy silt. 5P-1 contained a single fragment of rusted metal, Feature 2 is a two-sided terrace located at the south end of the site. The terrace rL:Iaining wall is constructed ufpiiecl angular and subangular basalt boulders, sorne as large as 0.75 m (Figure 84). There is no fort -nal stacking or facing evident in the feature construction. The terrace is approximately 3.5 in, in length (NW/SE) and 2.5 m wide, 141. 0LU 4116:1 ; 166. Figure ?S: Site 30611 Plan View Map. 1421 -0 1 1'Of, 141 ;dkl CCI, 19. li�'w�l i firx k*. 1;1�y' TI %lbi I: III OWN h I.IlfritiF tir[I,r. ��� IFF'if:Yil It r� i1111A' F 41 H F' 16 � 44Iff'" F1, PROOF 141M MPIL MCI 10 v 1 'a,,,, 10 1 6 " •v°'• 411E W IR 10 41 7 ,.� 4 k� � ! ► �4`�/.. ri «� tom. � .AY ` ,, iW^ v.ith a maximum height of 0.35 m. the surl`ace of which slopes to the west. There were no cultural rernains on the ground surface at Feature 2. Shovel. Probe Testing A single shovel probe (SP -2) was excavated within the level soil interior of Feature 2. The shovel probe was excavated to a depth of 20.E cmbs and terminated on bedrock or a large basalt rack. Shovel probe stratigraphy consisted of Layer 1(0-12 embs) loose dark brown (10YR312) fine sandy silt loam overlying Uyer 11 (12-20 crabs) soft dark yellowish brawn (1 i1YR4/4) rine sandy silt. SP -2 did not contain cultural material. Feature 3 is a roughly rectangular terrace located between Feature 1 and Feature 2 (see Figure 78). The terrace is approximately 3.40 in in length (NW/ E) by 2.2.5 m wide, with a maximurn height of 0.52 m. The terrace retaining wall is constructed of piled angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small. boulders. some as large as 0.75 in (Figure li 1). A. partial wall along the southeastern boundary of the Feature 3 terrace separates it from the Feature 2 terrace, which is situated to the immediate south. The intact portion of wall is 1.50 m, although it likely formerly continued southwest the entire length cif the terrace, forming two separate terraces. Thea were no cultural remains on the ground surface at Feature 3. Shovel Probc Testing A single shovel probe ('SP -3) was excavated in the level soil interior of Feature 3. The shovel probe was excavated to a depth of I L0 curbs and terminated ou bedrock or a large basalt rock. Shovel probe stra i4graphy consisted of Layer 1(0-11 crnbs) loose dark brown G OY R3; ? } fine sandy silt loam. SP -3 did not contain cultural material. Site 30611 Summary The terrace features at Site 31611 are somewhat similar to Kona field System features recorded at projects in the general area of the current project. They differ in that they aro more roughly constructed. This might be a function of the available ruck in ibis location—the rock is much .larger than that found in other places. However, it seems just as likely, or more likely, that the features were ConstrucLed in the l Iititoric L ra for commercial agriculture. Their somewhat rough and hasty construction is similar to other Historic era agricultural features, most notably coffee terraces, documented at nearby project area. Site 30611 has been slightly altered by ground clearing activities, the 145 .. W FFY ,, t � e ""� { � � , ... _ „� ,� M t ._ .�,� m .� •,,. _v�» ' . „ .. •_.� w � , .e J'ro :- _ _ i -� �� r' �k �T.� � � � � ��. k . � +.r y � � � �ry w .', �y _., ...y � Y ti . � ., w 'S .,., _ — `Y _, • /"�ma4.,...a, .. �R; ''off„ � ��, �f � �f� J' � ,q � {. I �i 4��1 i �'� 'M ip5 �.�• � '� Y Y � �, xlq. an Y e �y T � � F p�� j��� �r 1� .� features are partially collapsed in places. and the site is in fair condition. No further work is rec o m ended at Site 3061 1. SITE 30612 Lava Blister FUNCTION: Refuse Disposal Area AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 3.40 m (NEI W) by 3.411 m by 1.15 m in max. height INTEGRITY, Possesses Integrity of Location and Materials CONDITION: Goad SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Noric EXCAVATION, None DESCRIPTION: Site 30612 is a smal I cin lava blister located within the central southern portion ofthe project area (see Figure 10). The site is situated on a west facing slope approximately 10.0 meters east of wall Site 30598 (see Figure 37). There are koa haole trecs with Guitica grass ground cover throughout the area. The lava blistcr is opening is directly above the blister and measures 1.0 m long (NIS) by 0.65 in wide (Figure 82). The blister is approximately 3.40 m in length 1. EISW) and 3.40 rn wide. with a maximum ceiling height of 1.15 rn, A fair amount of Historic era refuse is scattered on the floor of the blister. Some of'the items collected and photographed in.elWed glass bottles, fhagmcnts of ccram1c and sEoneware limvls aiid plates, rusted solder top cans, a section of corrugated roofing material, cow banes, and various glass and metal fragments (Figures 133, 84, and 85). Site 30612 is an Historic era refuse disposal area. It is Unaltered and in good condition. No further work is reconunended for Site 30612. 147 Figure XI: Phutugvil-th vJ 4iiL 10612 RJiwIL2r Opoiiag I-ooking NL}rjl. 149 Figure 83: Pliuimrliph of Site 30612 H[sloric Era Bottles and Plawware. 149 Figure 84: PhwnLgraph o ' Site 30612 Soldered Cans. 150 nor 85: Photograph c I0612Hm eUu Bottles, 151 CONCLUSION DISCUSSION Tv,,enty two newly identified archaeological situ were recorded during the course of the archaeological inventory survey study. The sites are primarily agricultural terraces associated with pre -Contact era to Historic era agriculture and rock walls and enclosures associated with Historic era agriculture and ranching. A pre -Contact era to later post -Contact era lava tube burial and a portion of the old railroad berm were documented along the western and eastern edge of the project area. respectively. The Five acre project area has three primary divisions created by ranch walls (Site 30595, 30601. and 3065). All three of the walls are Historic era ranch walls and have typical formal characteristics of ranch walls; they are bi-faced, cobble core filled, and their sides slope inward towards the taps of the walls. They are all approximately 1.0 meter in height. Site 30597, located along the south boundary of the property and along the north side of a seasonal gulch, is similarly constructed. Site 30602 and Site 30603 are enclosures constructed along wall Site 30595 and wall Site 30601. Tltc latter two wall sites are, constructed onto the west edge of the Sitc 30592 railroad berin anti postdate the railroad berm. Sites 30602 and 30603 enclosures, as well as the wall 40tes, appcar to be associated with both Historic era ranching and agriculture, The northern portion of the project area, north of wall Site 34601 is north of the bulldozed "terraces" (see Figure3). It is mostly open grassland that appears to have been bulldozed during the Historic era to early Modern era. There were only two sites (Site 30591 and 30956) recorded in this northk2ri3 third of the project area. Site 30591 is an agricultural complex with six terraces. Sl i,� ,,0956 is a hearth. It is possible that the two sites are pre -Contact era to early post -Contact era in age. The terrace features are somewhat similar to Kona field System features recorded at projects in the general area of the current project, They differ in that they are more rouAly Constructed. This might be a function of the available rock in this location—the rock is much larger than that found in ether places. However, it stenzs_Iust as likely! or more likely, that the features were constructed in the Historic era for cominercial agriculture. Their somewhat rough and hasty construction is similar to other Historic era agricultural features. most notably coffee terraces, 152 documented at nearby prqicc-t area. The hearth at Site 30596 is similar to ether Historic era rectangular hearths receded at sites on Hawaii Island. The middle one third of the project area between wall Site 30595 and 30£05 is entirely within the 5ulldo;ted "terraces" portion of the project area (see Figure 3). There are three small sites (Site 30593, 301594. and 3060)4) within the middle third of the project area. Site 307593 is a pre -Contact era to early lost -Contact era lava tube burial. Site :30594 is an agricultural terrace complex. The agricultural ternices at Site 30594 are somewhat similar to Kona field System features, but are much snore roughly consta-Wed than the formal cm5-s-slope terraces and mauka:mcakaj kua'im-i walls clrrcurtientcd inn the KFS_ Site 30604, based on artifacts recovered from subsurface testing and the site's proximity to Site 30602 and 30)603, is an Historic era agricultural terrace site. It is interesting to note that there° is a lower site density in the nerrthern two divisions of the project arta cornparcd to the site density ire the southern one third of the project. The northern two thirds likely were used primarily for cattle pasture. It is also likely that the two wall sites 30595 and 30601 formed a cattle chute or road leading to and from the two enclosures (Site 301602 and Site 306013) and the railroad bei. The southern third of the project area, south of wall Site 306015, contained six primarily agricultural sites (Site 301598, 30600, 30606, 30607, 30610, and 30761 l) and tour Historic era sites (Site 301599.3€}6018, 3010019, and 30610 with functions other than primarily agricultural growing (see Figure 10). The nonagricultural sites are located closer to the railroad bed. The cluster of all of these sites together in this area seems to suggest that they are part of a Historic era commercial agricultural field. The proximity of this area to the seasonal gulch to the south might have influenced the decision to construct the agricultural features in this area. All of the agricultural complexes documented in the project area are located. between 604 and 700 feet (182. to 213 meters) ams], within the lower kala 'uhi zone. The region was traditionally used by Hawaiians for growing bread fruit and other arboreal craps, sweet potatoes, ti, wf oke dryland taro, and sugarcane. Volcanic -glass flakes, a basalt flare, and marine shell fra prnews were recovered in small amounts, from subsurthce testing, indicating that: Hawaiians did pass through and use the project area lands. The lack of temporary habitation features and the tact that there aren't more formally constructed agricultural terraces and rock clearing mounds suggests that ihcy aright RRL have 153 used the area for extensive cultivation. Ii'so, [lie agricultural terraces €io€;umented during the Current study are most likely the rernsins of] Iistoric era c;ornniercial agriculture. SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS Sites identified during this prnjecc were assessed for their significance as outlined in Hawaii Administrative butes §13-284-6. To be assessed as significant a site shall possess integrity of location, design, setting, .materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and shall meet one or more of the fol.lowing five criteria: (a) It must be associated with events that have made a significant contributiota to the broad patterns of our history} or be considered a tradlit final cultural property. (b) It must be associated with the lives of persons significant in the past. (c) It must embody distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. (d) It must have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. (e) Have important valvae to native Hawaiian people or other ethnicities in the state, clue to associations with cultuc-al practices and traditional beliefs that xt!re, or still are, curried out. All of the archaeological sites ducurnented in this report were evaluated for their signiIicance (Table 14).. A11 22 sites identified during, the current AIS study possess integrity of location and materials and were assessed significant ander criterion "d" as they are likely to yield information important to prehistory and/or history. All of the sites, with the exception of the railroad beth, Site 30592 and the burial Site 30593 provide information important to agricultural pursuits and cattle ranching. They provldc data on pre -Contact Gra tht7ough po},t-Contact era and the I listoric era features constructed to grow subsisionce craps.. "I hey also provide data important to changing land -use as some farmers began to use land for Cattle pasture in response to exposure to external trade routes and expanding markets on lWvai-i Island and Oahu. 154 I ably 14: Iw entary of Project Area Archaeological Sites, Significance Assmments and Site Recom II]rMl LI,11 mh- wile k 5ile Type Site Famiction ,age Signil-tcxnce Criteria RLcommi-ndalion ,I15'r7l ,' griculturil Complex Agriculture Prc-f'{intact to Historic Pea Li \I hinher %fork ?iiti92 RadnpLid Bell and Rer,n 1 Tran,'Nrtadon Historic Ertl a. . d PP{;yer%.6liiv 30593 l.!!.Va T LLhL Hari al Pi -e-{ ontact to Ear)%, Potit-( 47ntact Lm Ll, 0 M!Sen atwn 30594 Azricultural Complex Agraluu[turn Pre -Contact to Historic Era rl '_tiu ]-urther Work 30545 30596 kcwk Wall Possible Heardl ranching Food Preparation Ili Toric I'm Hetito6c End I d till hirtller Wiirk NO Fiirihcr Work 30597 Rock Wall Raoching HiL,106cEm d NOF11r111CIFWork 30595 Rock Wall Agrtctlllury Ranching Pre-Cowacl to Historic Era d No hLrihcr 1b`ock 30599 Phufonn& Enclosure b'anchimpAgriculturc Historic Eri d NO ] unhcrWork it 600 3{36G1 fexmare Rock Wall. Agriculture Ranching 16,ziom- l rl IIi�IonC l'111 11 Li a 1-ilrther Wt 11-k FFa further Wur&* 30602 Enclomwe RartchingiAgrriculture 111.,Iorie Em Li No Jrllr1115:rWork 30603 Enclosure Ranching Agdculture Ili s-wi i,` Fx: i Li 411 hInhor %� III k 30604 Agricultural Complcx AOcuJ1= I're- CoilLJCI t,, lIL,.,mii: Li i d 1u J :11113Lr WLAk 311015 30606 Rmk Wall Rock Wall l unchiiigiAL4hcultttm Rnnohingf Agrticultiue 111,1"ri{ I I':, Pre-Ctml.ILr 1,, l h,;ioric l:rt LI ,.........,d_ ............... 111 I md)Ll %4oik 111 I-iImher %� ,irk 30607 Agicultural Complex Agriculture Pri.-Curilacl Io Historic Liu d No V iinher WoT-k 3060 Emloaure MvLIIiIng mid Sicwupc Ml Mork: Fra d 111 hu ihcr Work 30609 Enciusurr D--• L:;Iiri+L :uid Sturagc IhnLor i, i:l.i d Nu Jrurlhcr Work 30610 3{361 l Terrace AgrteultttrsJ Complex '�i til ?{'III i!IIL' A'm-'it1II,IrL PIL-� 0111 til 11` I II4iI5r IL IAd NTA 0[11.[L1 10 1 titi1OriC I:r,! II LJ NII kid)L1 %koi a 11I I tlrthcr %1 m -k 30612 Lava Bltaler R'Iw'v OI:rrlp l]L+Isrr1. V rl LI No hIriticr Work 155 Ranch wall sites ( 30592, 30595, 30597, 30598, 30601, 30605 and 30606) and Historic era enclosure sites (30608 and 30609) provide in orn7ation on how the ]and was altered and the types of features that were necessary to fanning anti ranching. Even the historic era refuse damp (Site 30612) provides data on the types of items were available, useful and necessary to Farmers and ranchers. The railroad berm. Site 30592 is also significant ander criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated wil h that have made a significant contribution to (lie broad patterns of our history and it enabodics distinctive characteristics cif Clic type, period.. and method of railroad bed construction. The burial Site 30593 is also significant criterion "e" as it has 'Important value to Hawaiian people and people of other ethnic backgroundin the state_ SCS consulted with the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) Kann representative Shane Nelson to ask for any input regarding Site 30592. The burial Site 30593 is recommended for preservation in place with preservation. treatments to be outlined in a Burial Site Component of Preservation Plan (BSCPP�. The railroad bean Site 30592 is reeonam�!ndcd for preservation with preservation measures to be outlined in an archaeological pre,Qrwailon plan. No further work is recommended tor the rcmaining 20 archaeological sites (Sites 3059 land 30594 through 30612). Information recorded for all 22 archaeological sites during the current study has adcquately ascertained their function and age. Archaeological monitoring is recommended for initialrrubbint, within the five -acre project area and for any proposed ground disturbance in the vicinity of Site 30592 and Site 30593 to enscn-e interim construction preservation measures are in place and to prevent disturbance of the two archaeological sites. 156 Aki, H. REFERENCES CITED 1952 Map of Kailua. Section, North Kana. Ilawai'i,, Land Titles. Survey and Map by J. S. Emerson. Hawaii Territory SuneY %Iap, Registered Map No. 128(1. Alexander, J, 1555 Map of Hnlualoa 1 & 2, Kona Hawaii. Hawal"! Territory Survey Map. Registcred Map No. 1450. Athens, .1., T. Reith, and T. Dye 2014 A paleoenvironmental and archaeological model -leased age estimate for the colonization of Hawaii. American AntiyrrilU, 79(4);144-55. Bergin, Dr. B. 2004 Lo"val to the Land -The Legendar-t' Parker ranch, 750-1 0. Lrniversity ofHawti`i Press. Honolulu. Barrera, W. Jr. 1971 r ai Keauhou, North lona, hHawa . Bishop 1 frr.�a rrrrt k perr 11►rr+urrl liepcFr t .Sc'r tr .r 7l- Jtl. Subtri-Wed to Kamcha meha. Development Corporation. B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. 1995 Ncat•tir l arra, Hcar�cari lslurac .lrchraE'c,Iugrccrl Recarrracrrs carrccraf Scv n Pcrrcef . Prepared for County of Hawaii Planning Department_ Buxtchard, G. C. 1995 Population and Land -use on the K aidio r Coast, the ;tlorrkct Ltrrads lnveratoi)� Survey, Ketarhou, North Koract. Hmv al `i Alcmd. the :•` "arra ive, pnrl 1. Subrnitled to Belt, Collins and Associates and Kamehanielia 111VO-, fent Corporation. 1.AR fL Honolulu. Calfs, 1„ M,T, Carson. M. Dcga and R.1.. Spear 1004 Data R&:Over v rpt tiro Phase I and lI Portions of •floe Kah akcai Development Project .4r ecr TMK (3) 7-5-20:1. SCS R.cport 209-1. Preparcd for Stanford Carr Development. LLC. SCS, HonoIuIU. Deport on life at the SH PD Library, Kapolei. Carlson, A.K., and P.H. Rosendahi 1990 Archaenlogfcal lnvcnfor'y �Surtiev, Pualan Development - Phase H, Lands of Puapuaca I" card ? :Vc)IIh Korea Drstr•ict, Lskaad fal'I-laKaii. PHRI, Inc. report prepared for Pualani Dev lopnaent Company. Report on file at the SHPD Library. Kapolei. 157 Chinen, J.J. 1961 Orighml Lcatrcl Titles it? Hwv ai'i. Clark, M., and R. Rcclxtman 2006 .,1ai _.tr c-}aiie;logical lravetrtori, Sarncv ot'Tel K.3-7-6-00-1:003. Hithuth.v 1-' Ahnptrra'a, North Kona L7ivtricl. Lsland of Hcavvai'i. Reclitman Consulting Report RC -0360 prepared fpr r, Phil Tinguely, ):-Iplualoa Village Partners, LLC;, Kailua-Kana, Hawa.i`i. Conolly III, R.D.. and 1. Curtness 1979 Reconnaissance Surve'v at the Komohona Kai Subdlvion ("Unit 1) ,Sde (TA4K. 3-7-0-13:31). Reporlprepared by Science Applications Inc., Honolulu for G.C. Developmeni Co., Inc. report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Cordy, R. 1991 A StmA, ra f Prel Lvoric Social Change: The DovelraPttie nl of Complex- Societies in the Hall triian lrlandv. Academic Press, New York. 1995 Cewrcal Konu Archaeologicwl Selftemenr Parir},w.,. Department of Land and Natural Resources, State 1-{-1-,Jo is Preservzdtion Division, I-lanolulu, 2400 E.xalredSits the Chr'ef: Mutual Publishing. Honolulu. Daws, G. 1968 Shoal of Time: A History of the Hawaiian Island. Macmillan, New York. Hestlets, M., and R. Rechtman 2004 Arehaeolo ictal larrewor-t Sit) -v ,+' of a Grunt Inca•emem Roact Remnant Propegv (7't�fIC:3-7-�r-0�;(1f1.� lx�t•.�, 1-}rx}aa�a}rx�r I-� Alrrrprt�7'rr, Ncar•tla Tatra f�.rtricl, Islcuac�crf Henet i'i. Rechtman Consulting Report RC -0244 prepared for Curt A. Cottrell, Na Ala Hele Program Manager, Hoticlulu, Hawaii and Ramon Perez de Ayala, Kla`a1111i Pariiiership, FlonohiILL, 1.44 °ai`i. Dircks, A., L. Zcnobi. and R. Rcch(man 2013 Ar•chueolr_,giCtrl Irrver or'v .fur �e'v of the ,F'owjm),w� l Mivr. .w Farm ,ti'idulivision (?'i.WK.Y. 3-7-6-r 0/: 003, 009, rated 019), 1161 drw 1-2A ltar{m&ct, .Vorlh Koiia District, Island fHast•-ai'}. Rechtman Consulting Report RC -0856 prepared for Edward Rapoza, Kailua-Kana. []eye, T. 2011 A model -based age estimate for Polynesian colonization of Hawai°i. Archae€aloKv in Oceania, 46:130-38. 158 Ellis. W. 1963 Alar•rative of a Tara• of Hi7VV0ji, ar• Drrahvhee. Advertiser Publishing, Honolulu, Escoll, G. 2013 trc lru'ralrrt,rcerl fratrerttor e'.5�rr rcit' f ca{�rrrt fErr the SFr"ojm).4wdI1T&T Wireless 1 t k}cnrnrrnunic attutrs Tcri, •car (HA W 301) Siie Located in Ur)hialo a I" Ahupua `ra, Alorlh Kota a District, Huufai 7 f. lcalxf Ha4rw `i JTWK; (3) 7-6-024,-032]. SCS Report # 1340-2 prepared for Ace Fnvirontnental. Las Vegas, ESRI 2013 Arc GIS Explorer. Environmental Systems Research Institute. Redlands, Ca. Fager, M., and D. Graves 1993 Arclrcrcalrrgical Irai enrrrr,t darn cot' Ncrlrrc�lva 3rcl Dc{velapra�errt Pcrr e cl, Lrarad c��. Hrrluafcxr YNorth Kona Dhar•ier, island n f Haivai "i ( IM : 3-7-7-04:35}. PHRI Report 1231-073092 prepared for Dillingham Partners. Google Earth 2013.Gargle Earth Imagery. Google Earth, Mountain View, Ca. Graves. D.IC., and S.T. Goodfellow 1993 The Gor•dens ai''h`on a Rerisile d: Prralani Residential COM r lfgirti' Prase fl- Arc•hraeolt)Ls iecul Data Recover v' Lcrn ds g1'Puapuuu 1 `r and 2'1, 11 Orth Konu Dish -k-1, IsIapidol Hrnvah (T.AX:3-7-3-17:por. 28, 29). PHRI, Inc. report prepared for I'Lialani Estates, Inc. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Iapolei. Hart, T. L., S. L. Collins. S. D. Clark,.. and A. Garland 1986 hint l'crrrir f�'"oifa: Fr'+rrr`iarralrrr7r,rrry l'rae�res at 'rlr7, karya, Ncnui'r. Chaptcr VII_ Artifacts and Manuports from the Kei5pii Burial Site. Bishop Muscum Departmental Report Series 86-1. Submitted to Department of Transportation, Honolulu. Handy, E.S. 1940 The Leah -mica !'hIHILT, !'Olrrwe f. B.1'. Bishop Museum bulletin 161. B.P. Bishop Museum Press, Huriululti. Hammart, H.H. 19799 c l�erc}ralrr Jiz crl Srtrveyp cr a '? Aero 1'crr c crl fir h+Ulr.rarfcxa flrrl rrcr `� r. I cr�i cri i_ Report prepared by the Archaeological [research Center Hawaii, Inc.. Report on file at the SI1PD library, K,apolel. 1979b Archaeological Survey cif a 22 Acro Parcel ar He heal(w Ahu[nia `a, Korn, Hmvai'i Wand. Report prepared by 11w Archaeological Rcsearcli Center Hawaii, Inc. for Kalani Sunset Corporation. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. 159 1979c Archaeological Sfirvcv and Exc a alion at the Pr'uposedKoInchana Kiri .Subdivision, Holualva, {~Lofxz, Haivai "i Istwid. Archaeological Research Center Hawaii. Inc. Manuscript. Prepared for C.C. Development Co., Inc. 1980 crt rine Proposed Komohana Kerr" Subdinsiort NC)Iualo a, Kona. Haw ai'i IS' and. Report prepared by the Archaeological Rescar€ h Center Hawaii. Inc. for G.C. DcvGloprnent Company, 1ne. Repeat on file at the SHPD Libria ,,_ !x:71).+I-,i. Harrimat, H.H.. D. Borthwick, and D. Shideler 1986 -J rehaeok glcal Sur•tvev and Elccavaric,20 - I r -rc Parcel Hnlircrfcxa, Kona, Hr.7wrrO Islarxl. Report prepared by C ultrrral '-'urweys Hawaii for Maryl Investments, Inc. Report on file at the Sf 1PD Library, Kapolei. Hammatt, H. H., and S. D. Clark 1980 Archaeological Testing anti Salve-qe Excavations of'a 155 Acre (Ginter) Parcel in }Ilei ahurPara "a I'crh(xhoe, I.cr "ahoa, aired Kopula alaea, Komi, Hawai "i Island ARCH Report 14-15? 111. Submitted to Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. HammatL H,H,. and W.H. Folk 1980 Archaec hf gical Sur°ver, PJ ave l,- Prwtftrns t l-Keurrhme-Kona Resort, Keoubou and KaInihi'm Koran, ffawcai'i Island ARCH Report 14-177 11.1. Submitted to Kamehameha Itnvesiment Corporation. 1981 Arehaeulogtc'af Sit rveY rrl it 20 Acre Ptri-cel, Holrrcrlou, Komi, Iicai ai'i Island. Report prepared by the _ ichaeological Ros�harch C: eater Hawaii, Inc. for Kalani. Sunset Corporation. Report can file at the SHPD Library„ Kapolei. Hannmatt, H.H., W.H. Folic, and D.W. Shideler 1942 ;archaeofcr< ical Surve'v Tc� ing antiExccrvatian cif u l74 -Acre Parccl. fleduuloa, Orth Kona, Hawai'i. Report prepared by Cultural Surveys liawrrii f€n• the Canrlora Corporation. Report an rile at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Hammatt, H. H., and V. W. Meeker 1979 Arc-lrcree)fogical accaa°cftiorr.5 cure# Ileicarr Stabili.-atir�ar cal Kahalrr'rr, Korra, Haar aii Island. ARCH Report 14-172111). Submitted to (Torald lark, Urban Planner. Haun, A. E., and D. Henry 2600 Arc•haoolQgical l 1)VrrrrJr'k' SUrIVV TiVK: 7-7-04:56, h+eNv aloa 3, North Kona Islu$rd 0 H'cr+i�cri'i_ I ILlll1 aft Associates repart prepared for Mr. Sidney Fuke, Hila, Hawaii. Report on fila at the SHPT] Library, Kapolei. 2001 Archaeological Data Reco veru^ Site 14130 T K- (3) 7-5-1 7 --Por- 1. Prepared for Inaba Engineering. Haun & Associates, Kea'au. Report can file at the SHPD Library. Kapolei, 160 Hatin, A. h., J. D. Henry, J. A. Jimenez, M. A. Kirkendall, K. Maly, and T. R, Wolforth 1998 .Ali'i Higinva), PhasedAfiligation f rogr•ana Phase I -Archaeological Intensive Sumr v'r. Srrrnmai-1•, vol. d. PHRI Report 1320-452"798. Submitted to County of Hawaii. PIIPI, Iiilo. I1k)1ztimon, R_ J. 1986 Social Evnlution in Ancient Hawaii In Island Societies: Archcaeologicral App ro,ic-heti rrr FiY)hi iori ,aid Trrrra-yfi,rrrrraric)rt, edited by P.' V. Kirch, PP• 55-9& Univcrsity Press. Cambridge. Kahn, i., Rieth, P. Kirch... Athens, and G. Murakami 2014 Re -dating of the KulPou`ou rock shelter, Cl`ahu, Hawai"i: Location of the first radiocarbon nate from the Pacific Islands. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 123(t):67-90. Kame`eleihiwa, L. 1992 Native band and Foreign Dadr•es: Pehea La E Pond Ai? Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu, Kelly. M. 1983 Nd Xfdla a Kona: Gardens of Kona. Dept. of Anthropology Report Series 83-2. Bishop Museum. Honolulu. Kirch, P.V. 1985 Forahc red Gods frnd Fishlrryo s.- .,lrr tri Hawaiian A+ckzreolop, and Prehisroi-v. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu 2011 When clirJ the Pot} nesiartsettle HaWa1 `1. A re -view of 150 years of scholarly inquiry and a tentative answer. Haivaiian Archaealo , 12:3-26.. Kirch, F.V. and M. McCoy 2007 Reconfiguring the Hawaiian Cultural Sequence: Results of re -dating the Halawa dune site (MO -A 1-3), Molokai Island. Journal of the Polvnesian Socim, 116:385-4016. Kirch, P.V. and M. Snhlins 1992 Analwhr, Vol. I and 2. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Kuykendall, ft. S. 1935 The Hawaiian iw:irrg&mi. Vol_ 1. University ofHawalr Press. Honolulu. Landrum, J., A.E. IIaun, P.I I. Rosendabl, and K. D limont 1990 Archaeological and Test Excavations KahakcTi Developrament Project Area. L'hIRI Rclaon I57-0701185. Prepared For Wilson Okamoto & Associates. P11RI. liilo_ Rc1�c 7t on t%lc at the SH PI) [_ibtarw, Kapc�lei. 161 Maly, K 1993 Ka'ac) Ho'orriva Ptj `irwai No a-iViki, T#ae Hc�ar-i Str aya .S1raa�' of 1fa-AAiki. Published in Hawaiian, in the newspaper "Ka HvktF o Hcnrai'l (Hilo) J unitary 8, 1914 through December 6, 1917. Translated by Kcpa M My for Paul 11. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. 1996 11isLori cat DOC umeritary Research, In Archaeological Inventoa-y Srrrvea Proposed Henry Srreel Erlenslon Road Corridor, by Wulzen, W,, T.R. Wol forth, and LL Franklin. pp. 9-19. PRHI Report 1465-092696. Prepared for Mary[ Development, Kailua-lona. PHRI. Hilo. Coaly, K. and O. ]Maly 2001 Ile Tir'ahi Mo `olelo .NVn Nii- A "e Nil Ala lletle I He hi `la, Mai Keauhou A I Keatakekira. ,Ui Kona, Hawaii (A Historical Oveyrvicir of the Lags, And Trails Dove lecl, l3em cicala Keanhou at&Kealakehna, Kona, Hcfliwi `i. Mumu Dana and As caciatcs rop ari prepared for Na Ala I-1ele Prograrn Mariager (Hawai'i Island), State Division of Forestry and Wildlife, Hilo. 3002 He Waki A4a `olelo No Kcr 'Aina A Me Nu 'Ohana 0 Olaiki 'i iU a If d A-cjlc)O (Kalrrracr 0 Wcrrraaea. Kolaahr). ,I Xfe Ka 'Rina tivlauna: A. C ollectiwr of TWifioras Unci Hisiorical /I ccounis cif'the 1 aitch and F'Omilies of Waiki `i at WaikOloa (Waimea a' Region. South Kohala), wrd lite Mountain Lands, 14andnf Hai+,ai'i (Tjkff Over l,iekv Sheer 6- 7-01). Kumu Ponta Associates. Hilo.. Maly, K., and P.H. Rosendahl 2006 Phase 111;4rch aeological Site Preevei-valion Man, Pualani Residential Community .11iligation 11r ograin, Lands of I'rfrapnaa } `f and.?' North Kann District, Island of Hcnrcri'i (IA4K:3-7- 5-1 T �2N, 29). PHR1, Inc. report prepared for Schiller Humes. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapulei. McCoy, M. 2005 The development of the Kalaupapa field system, Kolol;a`i Island, Hawaii, Journal of the Polynesian Sociciv, 116:339-5& 2007 Revised late Holocene culture history for Molokai Island, Hawaii, Raelioc'arbon, 49(3):1273-1322. Mendes, A. 1926 Hcnrai'i Nei I28 Years Ago. Edited by W.F. Wilson. New Freedom Press. Honolulu. Mulrc�oncy, M. S. Bickler. M. Allcn. and T. La.defoged 2011 11i h-prer.islon daating caf colonization and settlenicnt in East Polynesia. Proc•eediar g s ra f "i{acx ,°Vc iie,rrcrl A cacfem.v of Sciences, 108: F 1926E 1.94. 162 National Geographic, Topa! 2003 Seamless USGS Topogrcq)hic• Akyjs on CD-ROM,, Hin ai'i. National Geographic Holdings, Inc, Wa hitagton, D.C. Nelson, D., L. Bulgrin, and R. Rechtman 2005 An Archaeological Inventor -i- .Starves' of `TA :3-7-6-013:00. Hr�laaalexa INI S..• 2nd Ahaaplaa `a, North Kona Dkvtri€ t, fslcnad of Hcmai 'i, Rechtman Consulting Report RC -0251. Prepared for Noron Enterprises. LLC, Danville, California. tRe i;cd 2006). Newman, T. S. 1970 Hawaiian Fishing and F arrraarrg on the Island cal`Hawaii A.D. 1778. Department of Land and Natural Resources. Honolulu. Pukui, M.K-, S. Elbert and E. Mookini 1974 Place �Vames of`Haivaii. University of Hawaii Press. Honolulu. Rechiman, R.B, 2006 Ari Ar•chaeoi(? ical Irrventori� Surveti� eaf'TAD;L•3-7-013: 017, 1lrxlracrlo a 1-2 Ahnptra'a, North Kcarra Dharict, kd and of Hawaii. Report Prepared by Rechtman Consulting, LLC for Geometrician Associaics, LLC. Report on file at the SHPT] Library, Kapolei. Rieth, Timothy M., Terry L. Hunt, Ctrl Lipa, and Janet M. Wilinshurst 2011 The 13th Century Polynesian Colonization ofHawai'i Island_ deism al uf. Archaeolal;ic'cal Scic�race 38:2740-2749. Rosendahl, M. 191313 Ifoluealoa 3rd Development Parcel, Land rrf Whicahm 3``; Nvf't'h K(.?fra, J5lciircl eafHau,cri'r ("I''A4K•3-7-04:35). PHRT Report 400-122297 Prepared for Dillingham Trust. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapol ei, Rosendahl, P. 1978 Archae.t)lu(rc�crl Reconrraisscrrrce Sari c,i s of -the 72 -Unit Develolwr ent Site ITA-fK:3- 7-6-14:3 and 3-7-7-04:22,23,27,471Kedluca-KonaIsland of'Ha+ t-Wi. PHM Report 5-122078. prepared for Gray, Rhee and Associates. 1989 Komohana Kai Subdivision Parcels, Lcrnd qf' Hcalualexa I" and 2"" Vor zh Kona, Island Of Htal v ai V TMK:3- 7-r5-2?:45 , 84}. PHR1 Letter Report 44-121181 prepared for Clyde Coatney. On file at the SHPD )Libra . Kapolei. R Rioth. R Smythe, and M. Takehiro Jr. ),+land cif )-)anuli. Slate of Hawaii. United States Department of .v i i.!1 rc Soil Conservation Service. Washington D.C. 163 Suhilt, R. 1984 ,Subsistence caret CorrfTicr in Koira, Harr a `i: An Archgeological Sluc��! r?f (he Kuakini Highway Readignineni Corridor. Department of Anthropolo�*y, 13.P. BishoF Museum, Honolulu. Report pr pared for the Hawaii Dcpartmcnt of Transportation. On file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei.. Sinoto, A. 1979 V raf',Six Acres in the Ahrrlrtaa `a of Holvaloa I and 2, Norlh Kona, Hcaivai'i. Departmant of Anthropology, B, P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Prepared for Brehin Constntction Company. Soehren, L 1979a Letter Report; Parcels 10. 12, rind 13 of TMK. -6-14, in l O[nalr , North Kona. Prepared for Mr. Hiroshi Kasarnoto. 1979b Letter Report: T : 7-6-15:15, Hulucrlurt, A'orrrfr K urea. Prepared for Zuzak and Associates. 19803 Letter Report: Arrchaeolog€ctrl and Historical Featrrr•e,s on the Parcel fdentifled lav Tar Map K(rr 7-6-21:14, Situated at Hnlrralora ?. North Kura, Hcwai `i. Prepared for Golders Trian�;le Real Estate, 1.980b Letter Repo ri. Archaeological and Historical Features carr the Parcels ldentift"ed d,I. Tcrx Mtrp Key l - -}=d:2.3 at Iirlrrcrlixx L, rrrrl '-'-t�-i: ".' f. of Ht'3lrrcrlcra 3, North Kona, llmvai'i. Prepared for BA and M Co Starr Environmental 2016 Botanical and Faunal Surveys in the State of Hawaii. Makawao_ ���� .starrenvia�canmental.earn. Tainter, J. A. 1973 The Social Correlates of Mortuary Patterning at Kaloko, North Kana., Hawaii. Archaeofogv and Pht;sical,4nlhrwpologr in Oceania 81):1 11. Tornonari-Tuggle. M, 3, 1990.Archaeological Inverter-• Stave'v gI'Development Parcel 16 of"the Keanhoze Re,vor�i, Ahrrprrer'er frl'Kahexlrt'rt, N(3rlh Kc)rra, islcitid (rf Hcnvai'i. Prepared for Belt Collins and Aswil iates. International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc. Honolulu. U.S. Geological Survey 1928 15- finute Series Topographic Hilo Quadrangle Map, USGS Print. Washington-, DC. URL. httl):/dgenircri77es_risgs_gotilpl.vltopoinapsl. Iim Vancouver, G. 1967 A Vo'Vage n Discave�r'7' to lire Norlh Purr frc� Ocean, and Around the YVor 1d. Robinson and Edwards. London. 1984 A Vol'cxge qj'Discovei-v to the N'orrlr pian ific Ocean, and.4roundthe FVarld. Robinson and Edwards. Loud4in.. Waihona `Rina 2014 V15hele online database. www.waihona,cam. Walker. A.T., and F.H. Roscndahl 1988 .Archaeolurrecr! i{c°c r�rrrrrri,+.scrrree Srr�� c ti'. f'rrufrrrar ,S'rnc�fiti i.+rcrn, Lcrrrd uf'Pr�upatncr „< iirllr r,rrcr 1�isltict, l,s'lcrrt�f �rj'fl�rti1 crrr, 111-11� 1. lnc. report prepared for Pualani Development Company. Report oil I& at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Wilkes, C. 1845 Narrative ref the United States Exploring Expedition Dia-ing the Years 1938-1842. f--� errldfldos. Lea car Blanchard, Philadelphia. 1970 Narra ivc rjl dw Uniled Stale> Fxploi1) g Frpedition During the Years 1938-1841. Vols, !-_5 ,doei!1tla,s, bw & Blain-hurd,, PlflrmA,1phia, Wilmhurst, J., T, Hunt, C. Lipa, and A. Anderson 201 la High -precision radiocarbon dating slows recent and rapid colonization of East Polynesia. PrcrceedirWs c /'1hi ,Nrltir rrcr114cad rrri a/'S ienres, 108:1815-20. 2011 b Reply to Mulrooney et aL: Accepting fewer precision radiocarbon elates results in longer colonization chronologies for East Polynesia. Proceedings (#'Ihe ertictrrctl:lc'�rcl�rrrs cxf'.Sc'fc�r7c'csc'. 108:F- 195. Wolfe. E.W., and J. Morris 1994 Geological M'.ap of the Island of i-lawai`i. U.S.G.S. Miscellaneous Investigations Series. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C, Wolforth, 7., J. Hetvey, and R. Rechiman 2000 Archac-oft)giccxl lrri°c�irtor)� ,S'rrrveyrrf Two Parcels• irr , frlrrcilrui 2iidcr►ui 3rd; Norlh otrDistrict, lslcandgfllc-rwai `i. PHRI Report 1341-080999 prepared for Mr. Ralph Berezan. Report on file at the SHPD Library, K.apolei. 165 APPENDIX A. ARTIFACT INVENTORY A-1 Site FE J slut L*Yrd Lwd depth WentIft0ton w4ght Caasi RtAMFi4S 305* 1 TU- I 1.1 0-29 cmbs hiatime 111vLm. b w 3-56 6 L I CuuArUFKKL : Cytrracu sp. 305% 1 l'li-I Il 0.28 cmhs Mamie lnvcriubrutc 1.17 la 4 "tropvtia Ncrim Sp. 30596 1 H -1 11 (2:2kmbs Marine L ISi'Ctla hmplC 4-U5 E 81 I°:tihmiiidea: Nm-Diug u!dic 305% 1 TU -I 11 0-28 emh Book! 3_0 14 I Bird 30595 1 TC -I 11 0-29 cimhs Bate 11.08 g 4 RLdemt 3 05 96 1 "L1'-1 11 0-29mhs Kakui 1.18 9 ClwrTed 1046 1 T111.1 11 0-:m cnib& Cwhim. 4.V2 123 3059:1 1 !1-' 1 II 9U-145ettirbs Sunk Glaas I�re�rnlenr 01 g 1 Cicor 30599 1 1 U • I 11 90.145 embs Jar ULass Fragmcnr. * L. I Brown 311599 I 11'-I II 40-145 curbs Nail Fra rrrcrtil5 1_l{€C.8 2Wire Cul 31)599 1 TU -I I1 411-145 crnhs B44tlh� CLIP 1_17 g I Ru4tcxi LIA" 305119 1 TU -1 11 90-145 embs JsrLid 7-34i g 3 Rustcd Metal 3051m 1 TU -1 11 90-145 erkbs Meual Fi-awixnts 48.61) -11 Rusted 30599 1 TU -1 I I 90-145 emh+ Ciyrbtin 038 6 3 30+4LW 3 SF -I 1k 11 0-511vmbs VoicaTllc(i1rt5s Flake t1-D4g 1, A-? Site FE.1t slut L*Yrd Lwd mpth WentIft0ton w4gttt Caasi RtAMFi 9 30f l)? 1 SP-1 I & 11 0-37 cmbs VAcailir L"1a-S5 Eicbitu�;e 3.03 0-37 cmhr l sutaun 83 g #fl 31161Y? 3 SP-1 1 0-1S cmbs Coral Frugmenrs UP, g 31If,i}? a 41"-I 1 0-15cnrbs volcanleLOWs Fla kc 0.178 I �IFf�li" 41" I II 11-31lvmlx% Car6N»g (1.mg 7 4 sf°-? I & 11 0-3; cmbs Bw: all Flakc 22-1-4 0 l A-3 SCS Nujeet Number 2330-1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVENTORY SURVEY REPORT FOR 76.121 ACRES LOCATED IN HOLUALOIA 1ST FIUPUA`A, NORTH KONA DISTRICT, HAWAII ISLAND, HAWAPI STM K: (3) 7-6-021:0l6-1}19] Prepared By Glenn G. Escott, M.A. Suzan Escott, B.A. MAY 2020 DRAFT Prepared for: Kana Three, LLC 101 HualMai Street Hilo, N1 96720 CONSI LTA NT SLMA(A-S 11,C 1347 Kapi'olacu Boulcti turd. Suilc 408 1- owlula. Hf 96814 liawai"i Island Of icc. PO Bax 155 Kca-au. 11196749 ABSTRACT At the request of'property owner Kona Three, LLC, Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) Conducted all archaeological inventory survcy (AIS) of a 76,121 acres oflard TI—OK. (3) 7-6- 021:016, 017 (por-), 018, aaidOly Iwated in lidlualoa I" Ahupua`a, North Kona D1 strict, Island of Hawaii. Hawaii, The owner is proposing, to deveitrp Clic propctly and contracted the archaeological study required for ars Environmental Asscssmcm (EA) as rcquircd for County of Hawaii Planning Department permit applications. The point of contact (owner) for the project is Mr. Diehard Wlicclock. The owner's mailing address is 101 Hualalai Street Hilo, Hi €36720. Mr. Wheelock can also be contacted by email at richard@eastwestrealty.org or by phone Ott 808- 753-3167. Prior to fieldwork, a search of geological maps. aerial photos, historical maps, historical documents, and archaeological reports was conducted. Pedestrian survey and site recording were c€rnclucted throughout 2020 by Joe Farrugia, B.A.., Suzan Escott, B.A, Tomasi Patelo, B.A., Nicole Mello, B.A., and. Glenn Escott, M.A. The project arca lands were used for cattle ranching and commercial agriculture from the early 1900s until the present. The majority of the proJwct arca has been bulldozed_ Evidence of bulldozing is visible in aerial photographs as alternating bands of cleared bulldozer tracks and bands of push pile. Pedestrian survey contirmcd the linear bands in the aerial photographs are bulldozer- cleared paEhs and linear piles of bulldozed rock along the cleared bulldozer paths. Sixteen archaeological sites were identified and recorded in the project. Fifteen of the sites were previously documented and two sites were previously undocumented (a small coffic shed enclosure Site #50-1C1-37-3 1 18 1 ranch walk Site #50-10-37-311X32). l° ivc of tlhc Ac}s were determined to be pre -Contact era habitation and agriculture sites. A single petroglyph (Isolate Find 1) was also recorded. Eleven ofthe sitcti were determined to be l lMoric era sites. the majority associated with cattle ranching and coffee and sugarcane agriculture. All of the archaeological sites were assessed significant under criterion "d" as they are likely to yield information important to prehistory andr'or history. The railroad bernn Site 30592 is also significant under criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a sigmificant contribution to the broad patterns of our history and it embodies distinctive characteristics of the type, period, and method of railroad bed construction. A petroglyph (Isolated Find -t) is also significant criterion "e" as it has important value to Hawaiian people and people of other ethnic backgrounds in the state. The railroad berm Site 30592 and the petroglyph are recommended I -or preservation with preservati€rn Mcasures to he ntrili1lCcl in an archaeological presmation. No further work is recommended at the remaining fiftecii ,;itcs. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.... ......... .............. ......... _............. ....................... ............. ......... _......... ..... ......... ............... .... ..._..... i LIST OF FIGURES.....................................................................................................................................iii LIST OF TABLES ........... ........ ............... ............... ..... .................. ........ ....... ....... ..... .................. ................... v INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 8 METHODS...................................................................................................................................................1 ARCHIVAL M FTIODS.......... .,.......... ._......,.,..,......,..,.,......... ..............,....,,,,,...................,.......1 FIELD METHODS. ...................................... .................................................................... ........ 6 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ............ ............... ........ .......... ___ ...... ....................... .............. .,,............ ,.... 9 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS... .... ..............................................,.......,.........,,........A0 PRE -CONTACT ERA .............................................................................................................. 11 TheKona Field System.-_ ......... __ ................. ............. ................. ...... ........ ....... ... 14 POST -CONTACT ERA............................................................................................................ 16 THEMAHELE...... ___ ......................................................................................._.,_....._,._...... 18 EARLY POST -CONTACT ERA AND HISTORIC ERA ....................................................... 22 PREVIOUS ARC HAEOLOGTCAL STUDIES..........................................................................................25 REGIONAL PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES.. 28 CURRENT PROJECT AREA SPECIFIC PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGY ............................ 37 EXPECTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL PATTERNS.....................................................................................40 RESULTS OF FIELDWORK...... ... _ .... _ ... _ ...... ...... ........ .................. 41 S1141' 10011 Platform . ............................. ....................... ..................... ............................... 44 SIHP 10012 Farmer Buri 11 Platform................................................................................. 55 SHIP 10013 Enclosure & Platforms................................................................................... 60 SII1P 10015 Bulldozer Rc�ad Scgnaent............................................................................... 66 SIHP 10018 Enclosure Remnam.............._............_............................................................ 66 SIHP 10019 rack Clearing lOLinds.................................................................................. 67 SIHP 10020 Bedrock Outcrop............................................................................................ 70 SIHP 10031 Enclosure Remnant_ .............. ...... ........... I .... ­ ...... ­­.­­­­ 71 STHP 10034 Bedrock Outcrop. ...... ..................... ........ ___ ...... - __ ...... ___ 73 SIHP10067 Terraces......................................................................................................... 73 SMP 16068 Enclosure.... .......... ____ ........... _ ........................ __ .................. ........ ___ ... 76 Sl_HP 10469 Modified Bluff............................................................................................... 78 SIHP 10470 Enclosure Remnant ......................................... ,...... .................................... _.. 81 SIHP10472 Complex......................................................................................................... 85 SIHP 10073 Complex ......................................................................................................... 91 SIHP 10074 Enclosure Remnant.... ........ ............. _ ......... .... 105 SIHP 10075 Enclosure Remnant...................................................................................... 108 SIHP 30592 Railroad 1 cnTi........................................................................................ ..... 109 SIHP 31 181 Enelosw-c Remnant .... ............................................... ................. ,........ ,........ 116 SIHP 31182 Ranch Walls.. ...... ...... ........ ............ ........... ................ 120 IF -I Isolated Petrorl�ph.._...._._._.................................... .._......... ................. ........... _........... 130 CONCLUSION,..................__.............................. ___ .............. ......,,............ ,......... ....,........... ................ 133 SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS..........................................................................................................136 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................ 138 12EFERENCES CITED, ....... 139 APPENDIX A RE1NTERMENT DOCUMENTATION. .......................................................................... I LIST OF FIGURES FigUre 1: 5,500 K -Series Map of Hawaii Island Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo!. 2003, Data Sntn°ces: National Geographic Society, USGS)_ ....... ......... 2 Figure 2: 7.5-Minutc Series USCG Topographic Map Showing Location of Project Area (Kealakcktoa Quad, ESRL 2013. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS)........ 3 Figure 3; Aerial Photograph Showing Project Area, Holualoa, Hi, Zane 5 North, 189445 rn E, 217179U in N. (E SR 1. 2013 Image. Data. Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Eartltstar,. USDA, and USGS)................ .................................... ................... ...,.............................. ....,... 4 Figure 4: Aerial Photograph Close -Up Showing Project Area, Holualoa, HI, Zone 5 North, 189445 ni E, 2171790 m N. (SSRI, 2013 Image. Data Sources- Digital Glebe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and USGS)................................................................................................. 5 Figure S: Map of Holualoa I" and 2`1 Ahupua' a Shove -Ing, Location of Project Area in Yellow (Alexander I955)__..__ ......... ____ ...... __ ........ ......... ........ ....... ........ .... _ 12 Figure 6: Portion of Kailua Section, North Kona Map Showing Location of LCA 7713 and Project Area in Red Harder (Aki 19521). ............................................................................... 19 Figure 7: 7.5-T�linute Series USTo1�€�g*taphic Map Showing Location of Land ComarrisiOn Awards, Laud Grants, and the Project Arca (National Geographic Topol, 2003. Kcaltakckua On €d. Data Sources: National Ga ographic Society. USGS).......,. ...... _------_----_.---_---.----- 21 H igurc 8: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topagraphic. Map Showing Location of Railroad and Project Area (USGS 1928)..... ................. ......... I .............................................. 11 .......... ­ 24 Figure 9: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Flap Showing Location of Previous Arcliaeole-ical Studies and Project Area (Kealakekua Quad, SSRI, 2013. Data Sources: National. GeOgra1)1Iic SO:iety, i1SCiS)................................................................................... 27 Figure 10: 7.5-.il Inute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Locations of Escott and Escott (2018) AIS Project Area Archaeological Sites (ES111, 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle). ...... ........ ____ ...... _ 35 Figure 11: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location ofNorthcrn Portion of Hammatt et al. (1992) Sites and Current Project Area (SSRI, 2011. S€aurces: National Geographic Society. USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle) ......................................................... 38 Figure 12: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Archaeological Sites acrd Project Area (ESRI, 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekto .......................................................................................42 Figure 13: Site 10011 flan View Map....... ...... ............................................... ........... ............... 45 Figure 14: Photograph of Site 10011, Looking East. . ........... __ ......................................... _ ........ 46 Figure 15: Photograph of Site 1001 1 Tota Surface, Looking Southwest............. ........................ 47 Figure 16: Photograph of Site 10011 South Edge Construction, Looking North ........................ 48 Figure 17: Photogrraph of Site 10011 Nest Edge Construction and Collapse, Looking Northeast. ................................................................................................................................................ 49 Figure IS- Site 1001 1 Tc,,t Unit 1 West Profile__ ........ __ ............... 51 Figure 19: Photoi—aph ot'SItc 1001 1 Test Linn 1 West Pro FiIc Locakiiig West ... ....................... 52 Figure 20: Photouraph of Site 10011 Tc,,t Unit 1 Overview Looking Northeast. .......,............... 53 Figure 21: Site 10[112 (CSH Site 10) Plan View Map and Fxcavation Profiles (Hammatt ct al. 1992:65)_._ ...... ............... ....... .............. ....................................... .............. ....... ,........ .......... 56 Figure 22: Photograph of Ground Surfacc at Former Site 11}012, Looking Northwest............... 59 Figure 2.3: Site 10013 Plan '1`ieN Map Showing Test Units (Hamman et al. 1992:69) .............. 61 ff Figure 24: Photograph of Site 10013 Enclosure South Comer and West Wall, Looking Northwest. ......................................... ........ ......................................... ................................ 62 Figure 25, Photograph of Site 10013 Enclosure South Comer and West Wall, Looking North. 63 Figure 26: Photograph of Sitc 10013 Northeast Platform (Left Top Comer) and Tube Opening (Foreground), Looking Northeast . ............ I ......................................................................... _ 04 Figure 2 7. Site 10018 Pemnant, Enclosure Wall Plan View Map, . ........ __ ...... 69 Figure 29- Photograph of Site 10018 Enclosure Wall and Site 31181 Feature 3 Ranch Wall Comer Looking Southeast. . ......... ...... ....... ___ ...... ............ .... 69 Figure 29: Photograph of Site 10031 Remnant Enclosure Wall. L00%ing Southeast—..,............ 72 Figure 30: Site 10067 (CSH Site 232) Plan View Map (Hatt matt et al. 1992:49).— .................. 74 Figure 31: Photograph of Site 10067, North View.,.............,..,......,,,....,....,.,.............,............... 75 Figure 32: Site 10068 (CSH Site 233) Plan View Map Showing Test Trench (Hammatt et a]. 1992:50)_._ ............................................................................................... ................. __ ...... 77 Figure 33- Photograph of Site 10068 Bulldozed Remnant Enclosure Wail, Looking Northwest. ...............................................................................................................................................79 Figure 34- Photograph of Site 10069 Remains Looking Northwest............................................ 80 Figure 35: Photograph of Site 10069 Remains Showing Bulldozer Disturbance, Looking Northwest..................., __ .................... ....................... .............. ............. ................. 82 Figure 36: Site 10070 (CSH 235) Plan View Map,, ......... 83 Figure 37: Photograph of Site 10070 Enclosure, Looking Wost................................................. 84 Figure 38. Site 10072 (CSH Site 238) Plan View Map (Harnmait et al. l992,53)__.,_,_ .... — 86 Figure 39: Photograph I of Site 10072 Feature 3 South Comer of Bluff, Looking Northeast.... 87 Figure 40: Photograph 2 of Site 10072 Feature 3 Southeast Edge Corner of Bluff, Looking North. . ..................... ............................... ............... .................. ....................................... 88 Figure 41: Photograph 3 of Site 10072 Feature 3 East Comer of Bluff, Looking North............ 89 Figure 42: Site 10073 Plan View Map........ ......... .......... ............. ......... ........ ........... ............ 92 Figure 43, Photograph of Site 10073 ) Feature I Pkl tfonn Looking South......... ... ...... ............... 93 Figure 44: Photograph of Site 10073 Feature 2 PlaLl'on-ri Leaking East ...................................... 94 Figure 43; Photograph of Site 10073 Feature 3 E [IC 10SUre Showing Intedor Level Bedrock Outcro p. Looking So uth eas t . ........................................................... ........ ........................... 96 Figure 46: Site 10073, Feature 1. TLS -1 Southwest ........ ......... ........ ......... ...... _ 97 Figure 47: Photograph (if Site 10073. Fcaturc L, TU -I Soiahwost. ........ 98 Figure 48: Photograph of'Site 10073. Feature 1, TU -1 Noillicast and Northwest Profiles.....,.,, 99 Figure 49: Site 10073, Feature 3, TU -2 Northeast and Southeast Profiles ...... ........ __._ ....... 101 Figure 50: Photograph of Site 10073, Feature 3. TU -2 Southeast Profile Showing Base of Architecture......................... ...............................................................................................102 Figure 51: Photograph of Site 10073, Feature 3, TU -2 Northeast Profile....... .................... .... 103 Figure 52- Photograph orSite 100733. Feature 3, TU -Bas of Excavation Looking Southeast... 104 Figure 53: Site 10074 Plan View Map (Adapted from Hamman et a]. 1992:9)........................ 106 Figure 54: Photograph of Site 10074 Rack Wall, Looking South............................................. 107 Figure 55., Site 10075 Plan View Map........ ..... .............. ............. ......... ........ ........... 110 Figure 56. Photograph of Site 10075 Enclosure, Looking West . .................... ......................... 11 l Figure 57: Photograph of Site 10075 EnClOSUI-C Southwest Wall, Looking Southwest............ 112 Figure 58: Photegrapli ofSite30592 Railroad Berm Rail Bed, Looking South. . ..................... 113 Figure 59: Photograph ol'.Slic 30592 Railroad l3criii Retaining Wall, Looking Southeast, ...... 114 Figure 60: Site 30592 Railroad Berrn Retaining Wall Profile ...... ...... _ ............................... _., 1] 5 iv Figure 61: Site 31 181 ]Tart View Map ......................... .............................................................. 117 Figure 62: Pholograph of Sile 31 1 K 1 EncIosLire Remnant, Looking Northwest ....................... 118 Figure 63. Photograph of Coral Abrader Fragment at Site 31181 ............................................. 119 Figure 64: 7.5 -Minute Series US(3S Topographic Map Showing Location of Site 31182 Ranch Wall Feature; and Project Area {ESRI, 2011. Sources: ]National Geographic Society, USCS. Kcalakckua Quadrangle). ........ ............ ......... -- ............ ........... ........... - 121 Figure 65: Photograph of Site 3118" " Future 4 Pin Pen Looking Southeast.. ... ....... . 122 Figure 66: Photograph of Site 31191, Featurc 4 South End Showing Wall Construction, Looking North........,,,......,.....................,...,............................................................,,,......,...,............. 123 Figure 67: Photograph of Site 31182 Feature 4 South End Showing Wall Construction, Looking North.........,..,...............................,.......,...,,.,....,................,,,..,........,,.......................,...,....,. 124 Figure 68: Photograph of Site 31182 Feature 4 Showing Tap of Wall Construction, Looking NortheasL.........................................................................................,,...........................,...... 125 Figure 69: Photograph of Site 31182 Feature 2 South End Showing Top of Wall Construction, LookingNortheast.............................................................................................................. 126 Figure 70: Photograph of Site 31.182 Feature 2 South End Showing Wall Construction, Looking Southeast............................................................................................................................. 127 Figure 71: Photograph of`Site 31182 Feature 1 I Showing mall Construction, Looking East.. 128 Figure 72: Photograph of Site 31182 Feature 11 North End Showing Top of Wall Construction, LookingNorth-- .... - ... .... -- ........ ...... ,,........,,.,....,.,.,..,....... .,. 129 Figure 73. Photograph of Site 31 181 Petroglypli...................................................................... 131 Figure 74: Site 31 181 Petroglyph Plan View Drawing............................................................. 132. Figure 7'5: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Archaeological Sites and Project Area (LSRI, 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USES. KealakektiaQuadrangle)..................................................................................................... 134 LIST CSE TABLES Table 1: Inventory of Subsurface `l"cst Excavations . ........................ .......................... ,.................. 7 Table 2: Land Commission Awards Recorded in Hcrlualoa I" and 2na A.hupua`a...................... 20 Table 3: Inventory of Previous Archaeological Invest [-attons .................................................... 25 Table 4: Inventory of Archaeological Sites Identified on the AIS Project. Area [Escott and Escott [)18 ) ................ .......................................... ._........................................ ......... ........................ 34 Table 5: Inventory of Previously Recorded A.rchauological Sites (H.arnrrratt et al. 1992, Hammatt andShideler 2007),............................................................................................................... 39 Table 6: Inventory of Iti-lamrnatt cl al. (1992) Archaeological. Sites and Current AIS results...,. 43 Table 7: Inventory of Archaeological Sites in the Current AIS Project Area. „_....................... 133 Table 8: Inventory (A' Archaeological Sites in the Current AIS Project. Area. .......................... 137 V INTRODUCTION At the request of property owner Iona Three, LLC, Scientific C011-NultL111t `ici-vices. Inc. (SCS) conducted an archaeological inventory survey (AIS) of a 76.121 acres of land TMK: (3) 7-"21:016, 017 (por.), 018, and 019 located in Hnlualoa 14 Ahupua`a, north Kona District, Island of Ha ai`i, Hawaii (Figure 1 through Figure 4). The owner is proposing to develop the property and contracted the archaeological study required for an Environmental Assessment (EA) as required for County of Hawaii Planning Departnicni permit applications. The point ol'coatact (owner) for the project is Mr. Richard Wheelock. The owner's mailing address is 101 Rualalai Street Hilo, HI 96720. Mr. Wheelock can also be contacted by email at richard@casiwestreally.org or by phone at 809-753-3167. METHODS The archaeological inventory sun.•ey vas undertakers in accordance with Harwai'i Administrative Rules 13§ 13-2$4 and was performed in compliance with t11e R«les Governing; Minimal Standards for Archaeological Inventory Surreys. and. Reports contained in Hawaii Administrative Rules 13� 13-276. ARCHIVAL METHODS In addition to referencing Hvailablc; resources at SCS, archival research was conducted in the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) report database and library facility (1 -milt). 111), the Hawaii County land records office, the Wc'rihona 'Airftrhldbeie database website, Ulukau database website, the Papakilo database website, the Hawaiian collections holdings at the University of Hawaii -Hilo Library, and the Hawaii State Library system. Archival work consisted of research On the history and archaeology of the project area, as well as specific searches of previous archaeological studies in and around the current project area. Historic land tise data, land ownership, reaps. and narrative information were obtained from the Hawaii County land records office, Hawaiian internet sites, and the University of Hawai.`i, Milo. Figure 1.: 5,500 K -Series Map of Hawaii Island Sbowi g Location oI- Project Area (rational Geographic Topo?, 2143. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS). 2 I "..... - I., .. I ... ...-F -,--.....*, ,... v�.�.. , - . _... .�.,,.. �,... ... �,.. �.. .... Saucces: National Geogi-aphic Society. U5GS). 3 Figurr 3: Aerial Photograph Showing Prnjecl Area, Hoolualoa, HI> lx)ne 5 North, 199"S m E. 21 MIX) m N. (FtiM, 2101 1moge. I )a La Sources.: INgiLai Globc, GouEyc, Earth4tar, USDA. and USES 1. Figure 4: Acre a I fll:,,Lo�rjT)h ('!Lr,C, III S[101k i I I` F`e'�Ijlovt Arw, koluLloa- H L ZL?ilL! 5 North. 1 X944; iTi F., -'171790 m K (ESR 1. 201,1 ltnago, Data Sourcos: D�otaj Cjj�ihc, ( Wol-w_ 1 irih,:lar. USDA. aki USC S), FIELD METHODS The archaeological pedestrian sui-Vey included: 100% pedestrian survey of the project a1 -ea, Global Position System (GPS) plotting archaeological sites on USGS and TMK snaps; individual site napping, photographing and recording, and subsurface excavation and recording.. Pedestrian survey and site recording were conducted in throughout 2020 by Joe L'arrttgia- B.A., Suzan Escott, B.A, Tomasi Patolo, B.A., Nicole ! cello. B.A., and Glenn Escott, KA, A series ofnorthlsouth transects spaced 2.0 to 4.0 nictcrs apart were walked across the entire project area. Ground cover consisted of tall Cali lOrnia and Guinea grass; koa haole. kiawe, and several kuk-ni nut trees. Ground visibility was good. The fieldwork totaled 208 person -hours. Glenn Escolt was the Principal Investigator and Project Director. GPS points for sites wcre platted to the Feld using a Garmin GPSrnap 62 hand- held. GPS unit. Site, points were plotted in ArcGIS using Universal Transverse Moreator (UTM) units (Zone 5 North) and NAD83/WSGS84 datum. Sitc bouTiddrics were dcterrn;ncd by the aerial extent offeatures and by ftaturc function anti temporal associa(ilon. F•oatures that were in close proximity (o c7ch other and that appeared to have functional and tempt ml associations suggesting tlwtiy Wel-C constructed arid usod a5 a functional set of features --those features were included together as a single site. Features that were beyond twenty to thirty meters away from each other, or that were constructed at eery different times, or for different eery purposes, were separated into individual sites. Photographs wwF rc taken of sites and features using a 25 cm north arrow scale with 5 cm black and white increments. Representative plan view inaps showing the location and morphology of identified sites and features were drafted using tape -and compass mapping techniques. Site documentation included site and feature type, function, construction method, and age. Feature type, function, and oige were cletennined by observing environmental context and topographic location, feature size and shape, construction mato-Tial, constructlon methods, and associated artifacts 1-1 present. 6 Ta hie 1: Iravmlerrr of SLtbsurface Inst LxcauaiiorL,. $119JPti1* TYPE FUNCTION AGE (Sit 1_tirAVATIONS ;CS F.Xt--%%AT1Cli115 101 l I Plalfurnt Ag, Ttmp Ilabilali Yn. Prr-(70nLacL 1.5 m ollu, 11 rllr`7 1 -' Irll 14012• E'latl•ornl & Wall BLuial Pre-C11Ltaa:l [elite Feature i \r ' n1' :I 7'Iv^ac71t INOI f-nclo urc tai .aua glue Ha111talion llrc.(.C)nLYlel a,5 m sq. m uI 4i°; 11 ,I ry 11'A'lom. ] .iL",C NO i4}ILL"Cr PTnoit 1(1J}17 Plalfonn C'altdc Ramp ill.!ilfarlL - 1noIN Eaclo%um Agricuhwul 1'1LRtOdc T3kdhloiccl I lila 14 6 Rock 1MfauliLlh Al,. Maung lli!clallic 3 I.D m L I -L' -.I loilrt I L111:1ic, .}lii` \IAr.,iIL BL3111,14VIN1 11W31 Diviobim. Wall Aj�-riculllll, liiclttric Site Mcs:tl}' Bull 14 axl Illlslx 1111).19 Pl3nlingC"omplcx -C [4I1ri`ratP A riLuJmr4 Il1,44mc I liwitir ' SllcN15L(IRLrrPTrsc'nt Site No Laurer PI -vie ht 11 11167 Terraces ITabitadon Pr,^,Contact 1.0 X 1.0 in - lJ7OM E.nOusurc Hnfliuziasll Prr-C alllta:L 0.5 X D?S rtt ^II_` *itr�Ily $u11d43cd I nfo(1 MOdilied BILIffiP1at1urL11 I-Tgbil tsilm 11i ooI iL: IJS X 4.3 nl k;o. '+1.1wT1}' BLrlldozed 11)11714 U-1,1,a1u: Gndkos1 C 1[11}71 lfornr tlabiLL01. 11 1'rc-t 411LL.14L 11.5 In 1 Ilk I�LYI IiIi,AIYI i..L O 1.1111'.l:r:'I,:.Cnl I101i72 Modified Bluff Ag. Clearing Pre -Contact 7,13 to squary tatm,l Sire?�1,a ti 131. i,I ,,1 101173 Complex Rini hilm.. 4!" Ilisloli TU -1. t2-3 X ITU-"':I XI Itl? I11VA I 11C1Lssurr CL"ITrr 471""4 tihL I Ili,l:"rl I,' 111,q I.A.-11 Sii{•Alnkth J'uildsl:td IM175I:nelo.wrc —TT -92 Rililroad[1crrTt TLum,rrreLll•II Ill:+':arir 31191 Eaclo%um Coflocl ork Shod Iii..go[Ic SitC'OnBdvoek 31182 Rock W311,, R;nehing&Ae. lli,tWric • Sitar numbcra arr prcccdad by the Prefix 511-111 37-. Ornagc Shading - S412 nor IOngeT PrL-NCnL. •BuTialSiFe It)tll_'ra'.ini<rrrLloifprajc�tprialrtn [9f13_ Feature types and function; v, -err .sleeted from a set of recognized formal archaeological types and flu tions dev l raped within Hawaiian archaeology over many decades of research. Age determinations are expressed in terms of recognized formal eras including pre -Contact era { before 1778), early post -Contact era (1778-1850), Historic era (1851-1965), and Modern era (post -1955). Age was interpreted on the basis of feature dimensions, type, construction. and artifacts recovered from excavations. Many of the sites identified during the current AIS survey WCrc bL111dozed in the past (Table 1). In addition, many sites were previously excavatcd during the previvua Cultural surveys Hawaii (CSH) AIS -study (Harnmatt et al. 1990. Sites that were mostly bulldozed or that did not have sediment deposits, or at which CSH had conducted adequate subsurface excavations to accurately interpret site function and age were not excavated during the current AIS study. SCS conducted test excavations at two sites (Site #50-10-37-1001 1 and50-10- 37- 10073, hereafter site numbers are abbreviated to their last five digits) to better determine site function, construction method, and age. Test units {TU) were excavated in features at. Doth sites. A total of 2.88 square meters were excavated in Site 10011 Feature 1. A, total of 3,76 square ureters Test -units were excavated at features that had a high potential to yield kinctional and temporal diagnostic artifacts, and where vertical control would contribute to this data. Test units were placed to expose the base offeatur€ architecture. Test -units were excavated in natural stratigraphic layers and arbitrary 10 cm levels when natural stratigraphic layers were thicker than 10 cm. Sediment excavatcd from all units was screened for cultural material througlh 1181h inch mesh. Stratigraphic profiles were drawn for test units and past -excavation photographs wcrc tak(zn_ Cultural material was recorded by type on standard SCS excavation firms and collected. Sail calors were recorded using Munsell color charts, sail composition was recorded with the aid of the U.S. D partment of Aj�mic:ultL re Soil Survey. Manual on standard soil stratigraphy forms, and profiles were drawn. 8 LABORATORY METHODS Inventory of midden a -.1d artifacts collected from the test excavations were weighed and analyzed by la�cr cif provenience within each excavation unit. Weight, count and diagnostic characteri sties were recorded for all artifacts. Field notes, wraps, cultural material_ and phoingr,"1111S pertaining to this project are currently being curated at the SCS facilities on the Islavd ORAL INTERVIEW ANDC ONSULTATION Gregg Kashiwa was interviewed by phone on April 19. 2016, Mr. Kashiwa was the project property manager for parcels 016 and 017 in the early 1980s, and was present during ATS work documented in the Hainmatt et al, (1992), He is originally from O'ahu but lived in Kona for several decades. Mr. Kashiwa remembered that rive acres in the northeast earner of the project area were excluded from the, original AIS because the property cxv, ners were planning to give the Iive acres to a group to use as an agricultural presct-ve. The five acres and much of the current project area had already been bulldozed. ror agricultural use and for cattle ranching. Mr. Kashiwa knew that there were ranch walls and Historic era agricultural features on the project area, but did not know how they were used, as they were no longer in use during his time in Kona. He also remembered the old railroad heti and benrt and that there was a small railroad stall along, the track just south of the project area. Mr. Shane Nelsen, the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) West Hawaii Representative was contacted to consult on the disposition and preservation of railroad Berta Site 30592. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The current project area consists of undeveloped land used as cattle pasture f01- several orseveral decades. Prior to that. coffee was groom n in the northeast quadrant of the project area. The project area is situated on fairly steeply shaping land with level areas in between elevation breaks. The prof oct area i5 between 360 and 7000 feet (1 10 t,, 2113 ureters) above mean sea level (amsl). The pro .�ect area lands are part of a large former cattle ranch and agricultural area that was started lir the r:arly 1900s. The project area is still used to pasture cattle. The project area lands were bulldozed sometilm between the 1940s and 1970x. Evidence of bulldozing is visible in aerial photographs as alternating bands of cleared bulldozer tracks and bands of push pile (see Figure 4). Pedestrian 9 SILrvey ccrnfimied the linear bands in the aerial photogmphs are bit] Idoze r-cicared paths and linear Files of bulldozed rock alorig the cleared bulldozer paths. The former Kona Sugar Company railroad bed is present along the eastern edge of the project area. The project area ground surface is a Hualalai lava flow dating between 5,000 and 10,000 years before present (ybp) (Wolfe and Morris 1996). Soil in the project area is Pllnalu'u Series (rPYD series) extrernely rocky Feat with six to twenty percent slopes ('Sato 1.973:48). The majority of the project area has been bulldozed in the past and the present ground surface is rocky sail. Rainfall in the project area is very low., less than thirty inches per year. Parcel 0118 and Parcel 019 are, seasonal gulches that drain rainfall dawn slope to the west. This project area region is dry, hot. and somewhat barren except for thick California grass (l Trae rlr cr rrrrrtic c1),llFl3r IF grass (MegathYrs7rs maximus), l oa loanle (Leircaena leucocepheilu), and scattered kukui (Aleurites mohiccana) trees (Starr Environmental 2016). A fairly large number of introduced tree species associated with Historic era ranching and fanning arc present in the project area, including kicAve (Pr osopis pallida), monkey pod (Srxm area sarr an), opiurna (Piihecellobium didee), tamarind (Tamcar-indus indica), coffee (C gffieca orcabica). and bamboo (Hambasa ,sta.). HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS Kona is div1ded into two sections: Iwlorth Bona or Kona 'akar, and, South Kona, or Kona hento (Maly 1996). Kogra 'akau was further subdivided into north (called Kekcahca) and south (called Kvrrcfka 'i-gnta� areas. with the division between the two at the ahaqraa'ca of Keahuolu, The project area is in HNualoa l" Ahupua`a (see Figure 1 and Figure 2) within the area of Kun a&cri '617ua in Kana 'akatr. Hstlualoa means (literally) "long sled course" (Pukui et al, 1974:48), H61ualoa l"t is a traditional cahaptica ca stretching from the ocean to the foot ofHualalai in the uplands. The coastline of Hblualoa I" Ahupua'a is primarily low rock- cliff's. Very little is recorded of H61ualoa Ahupua`a in traditional oral accounts. The Heart Stirring Legend nl` a-Miki, published in the Iiawatlan language newspaper Ka Hodtr o Hawaii and translated by Maly (1993) contains the only description ofHblualoa, The legend is, set in the 13`x' century but also reflects more recent influences (Maly and Maly 2002: 17). According to the narrative, lO The lands of Holualoa were named for the chief of that name; both R61ualoa and Pwpua`a were high chiefs, who controlled the lands from mountain to sea, which bear their Tranres--- Kaluaokalani served as a priest ofH6lualoa at the temple of Pakiha. This heirau was near the contest field of H&ualoa..- The lands of this region are named for various ali'i, all of whom were related. When the chief Hblualoa took up the challenge against Kepaka'ili'ula on behalf of the Kona chiefs, Tiolualoa called upon his gad KJk ij)i7 (xa to assist him in his battle... H61LIal0a vias the first chief to call upon the god Kdlaipahaa, and this was the beginning ol'this gods' use by the chiefs of Hawaii [Daly 1991208 -209] - PRE -CONTACT ERA Halualoa, Kona, and much of the and side ofHawai't Island, while well populated at the time: 01'E LLI-Opeft]] C'unUict. �xere settled later than the windward: side. Many archaeologists believe that Hawaii Island was first settled around A.D. I,00 l by people sailing from the Marquesas (Athons et al_ 2014; Dye 101 1; Kahn et al. 2014, Kirch 2011; Kirch and McCoy 2007; McCoy 2005 and 2007; Mulrooney et al. 2011; Reith et al. 2011; 1Wilmhurst et al. 2011a and 2011 b). An article published in the Journal of Archaeological Science reviewing radiocarbon dates recovercd at archaeological sites ort the Island of flawai`i suggests that, by rclying on only carbon saniples from short-lived plant remains, the most reliable dates point to initial Polynesian colonization ofHawaGi`i island occurring between A_D- 1220 and 12.61 (Rietlt et al. 2011:2747). Earl �- settlers founded settlements on the windward shores in likely places, such as Waipi`o, \ aimanu, and Hila Bay. The windward. or kv'alcw shores receive abundant rainfall and have numerous streams such as the, Wailuku, Waiolama, `Alenaio, and Wailoa that facilitated agricultural and fishpond production (Maly 1996:3), The windward shores. also provide rich benthic and pelagic marine resources. Figure 5: Mnp ofHnlunlan 1"and 2"1 Ahupua`a Shm,-in,g Location ofProjecl Area in Yellow {Alexander 1855), 12 The dry leeward shores of Hawaii Island presented a eery different environment requiring a modified set of subsistence strategies. Archaeologists and lustoi-121nti Lire uncertain about the exact motives that lead to the establishment and ,pnr a€1 ot'sculaments on the leeward side of I-Iawa.i`i, but some suggest population pressure, dw=indling fertile land, growing socio-political stratification, or simply the opportunity for a new sLGrt might have lead to new communities developing on the dryer west side of the island (Cordy 2000:130). The process was likely underway soon aftcr initial settlement Of Hawaii Island (Wordy 2Q00). During this perirrd, areas of permanent habitation were established in Kana (Cordy 1981, 1995; S€:hilt 1984). Habitation was concentrated along the shoreline and lowland slopes, and informal fields were cleared at higher elevations where rainfall was higher. Agricultural fields and habitation areas expanded across the slopes and coastal area ofHualalai during the period between. AD 1200 and 1400 (Burtchard 1995; Cordy 1995). The development of extensive formal walled fields likely began sometime around AD 1400 to 1600. This period inarks the initial construction of the Kona Field System (KFS) (SchiIt 1984). The dcveloprnent of the KFS may be, in part, a by-product of the need to €'Ntrnei wore sub,,iwionee resources from an increasingly limited agricultural base. The population in Kona increased dramatically during this period. as reflected in the abundant radiocarbon dates frorn habitation structures. shelter cavus, and agricultural soils of this period ('Burtchard 1995: Haun et Irl. 1998; chill 1984). During this period, the stratified chiefdoni structure becornes clearly developed in the archaeological record, Large residential complexes and heirrrd reflect the segregation of places and power for the growing hierarchy of high and lower chiefs, and ceremonial stewards (Cordy 1481; Haun et al. 1998; Hommon 1€ 86), The produce from the formal walled fields were distributed to higher chiefs through a hierarchy of lower chiefs responsible for management and collection of the cultivated and wild resources. By the time of the Compeli0ora Period (AD 1600 to 1800), the royal centers and larger heiau were in place, refIccGng the: grm, L in power of the rulers and chiefs .in the regi on (Barrera 1971; Haininatt and F o I k 1{)80). Resources inay have reached their maximum carrying capacity. resulting in social stress bctwccrn neighboring groups. Hostility between groups is reflected archaeologically with the development of refuge 13 caves during this period (5chilt 1984), This v0136le period was probably accompanied mpanied by internal rebellion and territorial annexation (floinmon 1986. 86. Kirch 1985), Royal centers are located at Kailua, 1461tialoa. Kahalu'u, Kealakekua. and Honaunau (Wordy 1995).. The region of'Holualoa developed into a royal center in the late 1600s to early 17000 under the reigns of K:eakamahana (reigned 1680-1700) and Keakealaniwahine (reigned 1704-1720) (Cordy 2400:244). Many WO and konohiki residences and ntinterarts reli�Pous sites are known to hav6r e existed here. The majority of the eiarr and royal resideTi ccs werc constructed along or near the coast, most notably at. Kamoa Plint south of the project area. The royal center at 146lualoa was eclipsed in the second half of the 1700s by the royal center in the Kahalu`u and Keauhou r4on. The Kona Field System Dunn, his travels in the region in 1923 William Ellis nowd that the area above and notith of Kailua was: gLlite a garden compared with that througli which they had passed on first leaving the town. It was generally divided into small fields, about fifteen rods square, fenced with low stone walls; made of ti,agments of lava which had becti gathered ti•orrl 1110 surface of the eaclo,,ures. These fields were planted with bananas, sweet patatOcs.111OUntain caro, tapa trees, melons and sugar cane, flourishing luxuriantly in c,, cry direction [Handy 1940:114 and 162]. Rocky binds in the olden clays were walled up all around with big and small stono: s of tlio* patch until there was a wall about ' feet high and in the enclosure were but weeds of every kind, ania`u tree ferns and so on, and. then topped well with sail taken from the patch itself to enrich it [Handy 1940:147]. These garden have been studied in some detail, and are often referred to as the "Kona Field System Many of the archaeological projects conducted within Kana deal with components of the Kana Field System (Cordy 1995: Newman 1974: Schilt 1984). This area extends north at lust to Kau Ahupua`a and south to Honaunau, west from the coastline and east to the forested slopes ofHualdlai (Cordy 1.995). A large portion of this 14 area is designated in the Hawaii SrHP (Mate Inventory of Historic Places) as Site 50-10- 37-660I. The basic characteristics and general locations of the zones within the system. as presented in Newman (1970) have been confirmed and elaborated on by more intensive and extensive ethnohistorical investigations (Kelly 1983). The kola zone of the Kana Field Systern is the area from sea level to 150 rn amsl. This lmver elevation lone is traditionally associated with habitation and the cultivation of sweet poinioes (gala), paper mulberry (Ytauke), and gourds (ipu). Aocultural features, such as cic.arin,g mounds, planting mounds. planting depressic cis, niodifi4d outcrops, and planting terraces, are common thrOUghout much of this zone (Harnmatt and Clark 1980; Hammau and Folk 1990; Haun et al. 1998; Schilt 1984). Dwellings are often scattered throughout the agricultural lacartinn of the kilo, but they are commonly concentrated alon- the shoreline subdivision of the kula crane (Cordy 1981). The shoreline zone, extending inland approximately 2.00 m, was used primarily for permanent habitation and ether non-agric:u ILUral Whvities, such as canoe s[urage, ceremonial and burial practices, recreation, and fishing -related activity. Royal centers and high chiefly centers were also situated within the shoreline of [lie kola. These complexes include dwellings for rulers, chiefs, and the supporting populace, places of refuge, and other structures. Single, or clustered, burials are also situated in the shoreline, and near -shore kula (Han et al,. 1986; Hamrnatt and, Clark. 1980: Hamman and Meeker 1979). Burials occur in eaves, within finely built platfonns, cruder rack mourds, and houses in the shoreline, and ars more often in the near -shore kola (Cordy 1995; Han et al. 1986; Schilt 1984; Tainter 1973; Totnonari-Tuggle 1993). The large,. and densely populated, royal centers were situated at several locations z1ong the shoreline between Kailua and Honaunau (Cordy 1995; Tomonari-Tuggle 1993). The residential areas, large and small heiair, sporting areas, and burial clusters, are present continucausly farther inland than the usual 200 meters for the shoreline habitation portion of the kola. Consequently, a variety of non-agricultural features are present in the kola near royal centers, The kahi'ula cane above 150 m amsl is a welter region above t11e kirk, where bread fruit and other arboreal crops were cultivated (Kelly 1983). Swed potatoes (Ipomoea batatas), lr, (C'rxrdrlinefi-ta icos a) rt -a key (Broussoner a perpy), Ji}ra), tori) Walocasia esculen1a), and sugar cane (Sarchar-urpa sp.), planted among the arboreal 15, crops, were mulched with grass (Menzies 1930,75-76). The current project area is in the kedu'aht zone. Above the hahi lfhr zone, in the 'trpa'a zone, fields with low stone walls were cultivated with bananas, sweet potatoes, tura, Y4"c uA'e, melons, 1i and sugar cane. The 'apa'a zone was notable for fresh water springs. Above the 'apa a zone was the 't-tnia'n zone where walled fields were created to grow plantains and bananas. Timber From various tree sl#ccies was collected from tate 'apa "a zone and the 'ama'n zone. Bird catching and cother fnreSt resoarces extraction activities were conducted in these upper two zones. Temporary habitations were constructed to be used seasonally when working in the uplands. In the region, people initlally moved into coastal seuin"s f0hlmore upland settings (e.g-, the 'apo a agroncornic zone.) at the saone time, esscn ially ignoring the drier intermediate zone (except, of course, as a thrDughway Ind een their gardens and the sea). In this way, the first settlers could immediately plant seedlings in the wetter uplands, knowing the craps would succeed. Permanent settlement would have first been restricted to the coast, bUt the sane people would have also been oCCup_ying the uplands (at least. wniporarily) as we1l, Itis only later that the 'intcrmediatc 7.one'(and Ole kala whi agronomic zone), would have been utilized for planting. 1013 1110I1IchKTWJ0AZU The extensive fealffes of the Dana Field System were exploited and altered during the po5t-cotltact cra. Walls. A a'iwi, springs, and pathways created generations curlier were used and planted with alien cultigens (cullee. cotton. sugar, citrus. and sisal) and ultimately used as pastures icor cattle. Ranching has its roots in the first cattle and sheep brought to the island in 1793 and 1794 by Vancouver. Two cows, tlxree bulls, five ewes, and five rams were released to prosper in the region of Kealakekua in 1744 (Vancouver 1967.(3) 11). Kamehameha placed a ten-year kalm on the killing of cattleso that they would have the opportunity to multiply. A 486 -acre stone coiTal was built in the uplands ofLehu`ula-Honua'ino, above K5inal a where they waft) raised (Bowser 1880, cited. in Maly and Maly 2401=28.5). Two American captains, William Shuler and Richard Cleveland presented two horses to John Young in l 813, Cleveland l titer returned with more than 200 horses 16 brought from California. Donkeys, mules and oxen were also imported for transportation and hauling. Goats were also brought to the island and left to multiply in the wild. By 1813 to 1815 caws began overrunning agricultural fields and btcarne a danger to travelers and residents (Ellis 1963: 291; Wilkes 1970: 204). A number of walls were commissioned to keep feral sheep, goats, and cattle out of agricultural areas and away rroin incomes. By 1848, in Kona District a Great Wall (the Kuakini Wall) was constructed from Lanihau to `Onouli (bialy and Maly 2001-286). In 1830 Governor Kuakini moved to oversee and improve government cattle by constructing corrals. Liholiho visited the saute year to witness strides made in the nascent cattle ranching industry. It was hoped that the exportation of tallow, hides, and satted beef would supplant the defunct Sandalwood trade as a major soun:e of income. Several ventures related to ranching, including tallowy making, I.inning, saddle making, and blacksinithing were initiated (Bergin. 2004: 156). Cowhide was tanned using the astringent mark of local trees (Wilkes 1970: 218). The lion's share. Lrfconinrnc;rcial enterprises on the island involved supplying whaling ships and the local market with beef_ The changing sAsititence and trade regiones developed by Incoming h.uropeaaa and American settlors, as well a� o her historical factors, caused a depopulation ol'the coastal areas of Kana. Rancllca were established at rniddlc and upper elevations, and farms were established in the uplands where rainfall was higher and the ternperatruues were cooler. Cattle ranching and clearing for sugar cane and cofFee removed many of the endemic species of plants. The suite of vegetation that existed prior to the pre -Contact era were replaced by koa h aolc (Leucaena leucocephala), kiawe (}'rosopis pallida), and other ncwly introduced invF,`asivc plant species. Schools, churches, stores, and other businesses were also established in the uplands. During the late 1800s and early 1900s. coastal Kona was no longer the densely pcnpulaled saciopolitical center it once was. ]t became a small cluster of houses along the trail from Kailua Bay to Kcauhou (Totnonari-Tuggle 1993:15). Homesteads, ranc lies, and plantations d3vlolred I file LIPlLE3iLls during this period as reflected in the pattern of Land. Commission Awards (I CA) and i.and Grants (LG) recorded during the Mahele. 17 THE MA,HELE Witli the cunning ofthe Great Wiliele ( 1848), the Alun Land Owncrship Act (1850) and the Kuleana Act (1850), the traditional Hawaiian archetype of land -use .vas essentially deconstructed and replaced with the European concept of fee -simple land ownership. Article 1V of the Hoard of Commissioners to Quiet Land Titles was passed in December 1845 and began the legal process of private land ownership. Through the Whele of 1847-48 (lie Alien Land 0wriership Act of 1850 and the Kuleana Act of 1850, land was made available for private ownership. The Iwlahele established a board of five commissioners to oversee land claims and to issue patents and leases for valid claims. Kauikeaouli (Kamehameha III) established and ratified laws to protect Hawaiian crown lands as foreigners began claiming ownership ofland they were granted permission to use for homes and business interests (Daws 1968:111, Karne`eleihiwa 1992: 169-70, 176; Kelly 1983: 45; Kuykendall 1938(1): 145 footnote 47, 152, 164-6. 170;). Among other things, foreigners were demanding pnvatc ownership of land to wure their island investments (Kame-eleihiwa 19921: 178; Kuykendall 1.938(1): 138, 145, 179, 184, 022, 206, 271). Undt~r the MAhcic and subsequent acts (the Kuleana Act of 1850 and the Ahcn Lend 0-wnership Act of 18s(), the lands of the kingdom ofHawai'i were divided arnong the king (crown lands), the ah `i and konobihi, and the government, Once lands were rhUll divided and private ownership was instituted, the maka "aincwa (commoners), if they had been made aware of the procedures, were able to claim the plots on which they had been cultivating and living as stipulated in the Kuleana Act (1850). These claims, he wQvcr. could not include any previously cultivated or presently fallow land, okipu `u, stream fisheries, or many other resources traditionally necessary for survival (Karne`eleihiwa 1992:295; Kelly 1983:45-76: Kirch and Sahlins 1992 vol. 1:3. 135-137, and vo1.2:2). The right of claimants to land was based on the written testimony of at least two witnesses who could corroborate the claimaWs long-standing occupation and use of the parcc](s) in question. The claimant might have been awarded a patent for the property, subsequently called Land Commission Awards (LCAs) (Chinen 1961:16). The Land Commission awarded the majority ofH6lualoa I" and 2,d Ahupua`a to Victoria Ka<m&maIu Kat`ahumanu 1V, Kahina Nui of Hawaii IsIajid and Crown Princess of Flawai"i as Land Commission Award (LCA) Number 7713, `Agana 43 (Figure h). 18 r�l w�r�r � '^w• A a � �� 5Op r 1111 u l • s v r' - r ' .. y .. � � - moi.. r � ° N y-' • E , w J 4 Figure 6: Portion ofKailva. Section, North Kona Map Showing Location of LCA 7713 and Project ,Area in Red Border (Aki 1952)_ I9 Several smaller LCA and Land Grant (L() properties were also recorded in the upland region of 1I6lualoa 1?" and 2`x`1 Ahupua`a (Figure 7). Twenty four Land Commission awards were recorded in Mlualoa l't Ahupuwa, tate almpua'a where the project area is located (sec Figure 7 and Table 2). 'rabte 2. Land Commission Awards kecorded in Mualoa I" and 2"`I Ahupua'a, LCA# AWARD1_ D 1 O rill 1UPUA"A ACRES ,0611 John (I. Nltinn 1-161tialca 1" 1 1 1.5 43,05 Kekoi 1161LK:t10a t ' 1.7 55SI Kauotla 1*lualoa 1" 1.9 55- 1 Kealy kolohc I iOlLtaloa 1" 11.27 5755 Kcliikanakaole FfMualoa 2"', 2.2 5810 KaopLtkatlll.t 1,74 5993 Lvi.aila ala Hutri:Joa 2"` 2.0 6063 Halts 1 `` 2.9 6107 7339 7340 7340.13 7443 Naafi Kwt,ula Kansa 2 Kamal ] Kalfina na Hi,lii.i;, :i i`` I L-11 t1.t!'1 11, 1 l u4t •."a ]'l 11011.u_oa 1 jc III.L_, 'I 4 ' 3.94 4.15 2.5 1.3 t.94 7713 Kanaanlalti I IoILI-, loa I'' & H�lualoa 7m� Large $ 7746 hamzihMo Mtlaloa I" � 17 7791 Kauatkzni Holtialca 1" 1.8 7990 Pu 11R.i Wltialm 1'' 1.1 8115 Ai po T-Wiialoa 2"` 1.4 8151 11c1lena 1161Li3loa 1" 2.3 8223 lkaiaka 116lualoa 1" 3.5 9115 Liinahaiia IWILia1()a I 2.42 9932 Lumaaw e 1 i6luatloa 1 "' 2.98 10770 Puuiatie IWILK110a 1" 3,06 10400 Naainlakaulii 1--lolualoa V& Mlualoa 2 3.5 A portion of LCA ##3660 to , ohii G. Munn makes up a thin strip of land located through the center of the current pru.j":�: . ;7 r. i. With the notable exception of LCA #3660 and a few other targe LCA.s, the avcm. QL7 .i•.t:trd was 2.8 acres, most (n=16) were for lass than. 3.0 acres. Thrce Land Grants (LO ;� 1 S92, 1602, and 31:30) were also recorded in Holualca I " and 2"`I AhUpUa'a. LG # 1592 was a 25.0 -acre parcel scald to Kea laIio and LG #3630 was a 38,2 -aero parcel scald to W.H. Cromkvell. Almost all of the awards and grants were used as subsistence and commercial farm land, and scarce were used to pasture cattle (Esco(t and Escott 2018). 20 r r s - _ r It M } F � �F �. , s� � f ,, �"',�5 '�' � wy I ri� de1r • �M r •' `M I t l . Figure 7: 7.5 -Minute Series US6S Topographic Map Sho%king Location ot-Land Uoni tlk'1011 Al kL, rJti_ 1_LLOCI Crams, and the Project Area (National Geographic Topal. 21H13„ K.ealakekua Quad. Dari Sources; National Geographic Stu ,SLY. USGS ). 21 EARLY POST -CONTACT ERA AND "IISTORIC ERA Fonital cattle ranching began in the Kona region in the mid- I800s, but wild cattle may have been In the area as early as the late 1700s. The pro `ding ('walls of the land'), native tenants' wall enclosures, were prevalent in the ,area, as indicated by their inclusion in many local ffhele testimonies. "These were used to mark the boundary of properties and to keep livestock out of crop areas (Kuykendall 1957.318 note 76). Later. cattle ranchers built walls to control their cattle. In the early 1840s, cattle were said to be "maintained on the kula," a mile from the coast where the ground was "covered with herbage" (V4WiLkes 1845:4, 951. Cattle, introduced to Kona by Vancouver in 1794, became a nuisance later, when their numbers increased. They fed on the grass of the kula and from time to time on the thatch of Hawaiians' horses and on vegetables in their ga_trderrs. The open upland fields, bounded only by lmv earth and stone walls, were in full cultivation in the 1850s [Kelly 1983-761. Ranchers leased land below the railroad to graze cattle that they owned (Kelly 1983:1 1 1). Higher walls Acre built in the 020s wid 19300 to control animals. According to Jae Gomes, a longtime rancher in the area, Walls about 3 ft logit can keep donkcy°s pcTineti. The usual wall is ahout 4 11z ft high and keeps cattle in. For goats you need a wall 6 to 8 t'i high. For wild pigs you need a 6 to 81i -high walf. They climb over lower walls easily. They come down from the mountains for macadamia nuts and also in mango season for mangoes [Kelly 1993,1121. Sugar was a major crop in Hawaii tr', 1 rLLI V as signing of the Reciprocity Treaty to 1876 (Kelly 1983-90). . The sugar industry grew rapidly. and by 1899 the only sugar trill in the Kona area was built by the Kona Sugar Company. Many Chinese worked on the sugar plantations (Kelly 1983:111). They built a railroad in 1901 to haul cane from the fields to their mill site along the Wai`aha stream, north of the current project area, The strearn did not provide enough water to mil l cane year round and company failed in 1903. The Kona Sugar Company was bought by James Castel in 1906 and was later purchased by Japanese investors. The Kona Sugar C omp�in% continued to operate until 1926. 2 2 The railroad was bought by Kana Development Company. and was used ic)r lrei�4ht, sups anc� and by the Hawaiian Ltinzber Company. Sugar was grown above the railroad l ine. The cul sugar was delivered to the tracks with the assistance Orgrac ity, by wire cables and flurnes. The rail line was seven miles long and extcnde'd from I16lualoa to Keopuka (Figure 8). Cotton was grown on lands below the railroad tracks (Kelly 1983. l 1 1). Cottou gins were located south of the project arca. Cotton was being picked as late as the 19-10". Other pIcint, gr{awn below the tracks in the dryer lands were sisal and tobacco (Kelly 14)8 w:1 1 , ). Traditional Hawaiian subsistence practices, including the rights to collect resources from all ecological zones of one's ahnInr€r `cr, were challenged, restricted, or prevented. As private land owners considered their properly off limits to others, cultivation and collection of resources on private land diminished. Individual Hawaiian. cultural beliefs, specialized kiioledge, and practices associated with the tIse of the different ecological resource zones also diminished. The development of cattle ranching and commercial craps, such as sugar cane and coffee. removed traditionlI cul(igens and resources from large swaths of the lands of Kona. The changing subsistence and trade regimes developed by incoming Luropean and A nerican settlers, as well as rather historical facture, caused a depopulation of the coastal areas of lona. Ranches were established at loner elevations and farms were established in the uplands where rainfall was higher and the temperatures were cooler. ScIlools, churches, stores, and nthcr businesses were also established in the uplands. Curing the late I 800 and early 11300s, H61ualoa was no longer the densely populated sociopolitical center it once was. The coastal area ofilolualoa had become a small cluster- of houses along the trail from KaiILia Bay it) Keauhou. The Project area is just make -ii (west) of the majority of land commission awards and is at the same elevation as portions of the land grants in the region. Based on historic documents, the project area and surrounding lands were likely bJng used 11vr SUbsistence and commercial agriculture, as well as for cattle pasture from the raid to late 1800s, The project .area right have been u;ed later than surrounding lands because of its steep slopes and very rocky soil, but based on aerial photographs. the project area was bulldozed sometime around the 1950s in preparation for corrrmercial agriculture. i3 s. " 1 Figure S. Portion of 15 -Minute Series USES Topographic Map Showing Location of Railroad and Project Area (USGS 1328). 24 PREVIOUS ARCH.AECl1.(1GICAI. STI 'DlFS There are at least 33 previous archsio)lw-,it:�il r. ports for lands near the current project area, including studies in Puapua'a 21111 and Holualoa V", 2"`l, and P Ahupua`a (Table 4 ,and Figure 9). The: studies were conducted ti•om the coast to roughly 1,160 ft amsl and encompass the kilo region (0-500 ft), the > aln `idu region (500-1,000 ft), and the lower portions of the 'e wa region (1,000-2,5M 11), Results of the previous archaeological studies are Summarized below by elevation: studies numbered 1 through 15 in Table 3 and Figure 9 are situated from the coast to Queen Ka'abumanu Highway (U- 360 It amst), studies 16 through. 21 are located from above the Queen .Ka`ahbmanu Highway to just below Hualalai Road (306-760 ft amst), and studies 22 through 24 are above Hualarlai road to just above l Rmalahoa Highway (1,100-1,460 ft ams)). Table 3: Inventory of Previous Arcllacologie.al Inv esti;,=ations. Projecl \tilliber Reference T►pe of Study Area in Acres Results (Figure 8) I LaTicll mil :F 411. 1 COO alt I1 ltL7lt1� 9� ll N 46 1,191ti G171'trllll?rk �k11'tti� Anliacolog:�:al Data I Catis et al. 20t}4 N ;1 1t1 Sites RCCOn r Carlson & RoscT)daa sl �rcllaco10g1C111 � 65 64 Sites W 1990 111VO110' ' SLf1`VCi Archaeological Haun eta]. 199 13 31 Sites G171'�;11t4'1 � �L19'�'CV' 4 Hainma91 & Futk 19XI Aichavolo,,,rcal SLkr>•CV 9f1 20 Sites Archaeological SLw-� 44 1�'dn7TTi;a9t o ;a1 Gc)kh 11} 21 Slft' & Exc aY'aticros, Ar haeolopuical Data ti Fl, lr[t & I Cc[orti 20all t Site 1�k�COVCrk ArchLicological 95 G'..r�'[7[[ _411 .i 2 Sites I nve 31tory Survey Ai%:-11:3eo lgn';d 7 Sinoto 1971) lei Lt?17[lnlJn.l37t� SL[r4'CV C> Rock Walla 9 11anviion 1979h ATLA3:IC010 CZ.11 SLN1'VOV K'71CS 9 Hrrr11rnaii N79i' SLO",CY ;9", 11CS 1979 fik:L',r1 u ai,sattcc sur~ Ley Archaeological 1f1 Hammtatt t479a 46.8 11 Sites Invenlor y Sunc . ArchaeologiCal SLkr-VCY 1U H:imniLkf9 1980 103 88 si[C3 & E xc'.ravatl(ra1. rchaco[ogica1 I I Nelson %:I crl 205 ?K ''' Sire Git1elII 7r SurNe __ Arw Ittic: Io. ic,af ] 2 Roscnclbal 1978 2' t Site R04~011[rl[II.',-MCC. SLLrVe 12 Scvhrk:n 1980ii Aa:I1,wo1, ,-,i4 i1 Ilia 7 Sites 25 Project Number Reference Type of Study Area in Acres Results (Figure 8 Rei�o,7 a1—,,,.i71cu Sm -%c 12 4� olforth ct al. 20f10 Art 11icoI0g; sl1 81 7 Sites 11wentory Survey Arrhac010111cill 3+several ag. 13 Barrera 1995 Reconnaissance Survey 17 mounds Archaeological 12 110 � Features, 13 Haun & Henry 2f20WInverltury survey 1 K2 of Which Were Agricultural) Field \Iodii ed 14 Rc�senda.Lil 1989Arrhfoolo.,�icel Inti eetion {; 011tcros 1 sellill 191K4 Archawlu Teal Stadv 17 ]-,4 silex ] , Walker & Rowndalhl Arehaeuto0cal 104 67 Silc.r Iti]t�c Rccurtnaissance Sur�'cV (11-ves & Uoodiellow Archaeological Data lfi 1993 Rccuw cr, I04 58Sircti Maly & Rosendahl ArcliacoloiricLrl lb 20016i'rr5l - r"x :I:It 471 J'I,III 1.'i sIlcti 17 Harinsnattcl al. [09-1 1rt`714ti1+;; i.,71 1 � 4 site; IN so [u-0ll I Ygob Ari h e o lagica 10 l Site I;rr`conna.7—Eir1ce Surlr'gv 19 Re4 htn1111 2I1I t! Arclvcvlogical LOOS y lnaw`ntcrr r Starve ` --flus Archaeological 20 Pwscndahl 19813 kccororiaiSaarlcs; Sten cv ] ± 17 Sites 20 Fagrer & Grslvos 100 1 Archacvlt�uwal ! i 17 Sites hivL nlory Suris y I Site { 149 Archacotevicail Historic to 21 Y}i1Gk5 Et al. 201.3 Inventory survey 10y{a 4y Modem Farming Feattrres) 22 Desilets et al. 2004 Arc:1nicv10 �it:irl � 11.7 1 Hoir stead 1r� °eatitt�ra Sur" ey Fcal urcw 73 Rcchlnian 2013 29 24 SUCS, Clark & Pcchtrnan Arch%9eclovical2 6 1lisixic Era 24 'Ow) in�t:nto � Surae 7 Archaeological � 7 Pn-cDill. LL. t 25 Escott & Escott 2019 5.0 and Hi oork Fra Inventory 5urve Site, 26 A L KPI �1016111 I NIFFM L V P. b�il Figurc9: ". 5 Al i iititc Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Local ion ofP rev ic Lis Arrhaeological SLUd ies and Project Area (Ki:;EktkCkLL;L Quad. F.'.',R 1. 201 �, [)1w -Smirec%: Notional Geographic Sivioty, USGS). 27 REGIONAL PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES 1. Landrum et aL 1990, and CaIis et al. 2004. PHRI, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory Survcy (LandrurTt et al. 1990) and SCS, Inc. conducted data recovery itivesii ations (Calls et al. 2004) at the Kaihakai development project. Thc� project area is located within the lower elevations of Proapua`a 2"t Ahupua`a. Pre -Contact era to early post -Contact era cave shelters, {agricultural rock clearing mounds, burials, shrines, and a passible hciau were identified dunrng the AIS study. A heiau complex, several burials, and Five pennarient habitation sites were recommended for preservation. All of the preservation sites are near the coast. 2. Carieson and Rosendahl 1990. PHRI, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory survey of 65 aures between Kuakini and Quem Ka;ahurrranu highways in Puapua`a 2" Ahupua`a. Their study recorded 64 archaeological siLn including pre -Contact era habitation, agricultural, and burial sites. Seven sites were assessed as significant and recommended for preservation (Carleson and Rosendahl 1990: 34). 3. Haun et al. 1998. PHRI, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory survey of the proposed Alii Drive corridor through several ahupua`a_ Numerous pre -Contact era site complexes were recorded in Puapua`a 2"d and Mualoa 1" through 4`r' Ahupua`a. The site complexes included a large number of agricuittiral featLires. as well as habitation, burial, and cerenionial features. 4. Hammatt and Folk 1981, and Hammatt et aL 1986. Two archaeological surveys were conducted on a 210 -acre parcel of below Kuakiili Highway. The first study recorded 20 sites, and the second recorded 21 sites. Mane of tltt sites were recommended for preservation (Harnmatt and Folk 199 l: it, and Hamma(t et al. 19110: 87). The report also recommended that the single documented burial k relocated. 5. Haun & Henry 2M. Haun and Associates conducted an archaeological data recovery study at a c -shaped enclosure located on 1.59 acres of land below Queen Kai`ahurnanu Highway 6. Escott 2413. SCS conducted an archaeological study onl .962 acres of land near the intersection of Kuakini and Queen Ka`abumanu I,ighwa.ys. Two historic era ranch walls were recorded during the study. 7. Sinoto 1979. Aki 5inuto recorded several Historic era ranch rock walls on a six acre parcel ofIand just mauka of Alii Drive. S. H,ammatt 1979b. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 22 acres just south of Kuakini Highway. Three archaeological sites were recorded during the study. None of the sites were recommended for preservation (Harnmatt 1979b. ii, and 10). 9. 1lammatt 1979c. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 23 acres located in the near coastal portion of Holualoa. I" and 2"' Ahupua°a. Thirty nine archaeological sites Were recorded during the study. The report recommended that all burials. incltrd Ing a known cemetery site he relocated, ( ilummatt 1.979a: 5). Nene of the reniaining sites (pre -Contact era habitation and �1"FiCILItUrO Sites) Were recommended for pTCL L'T-Yati011 irl place. 10. Conully and Gunness 1979, and Flammalt 1979ir and 1984. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 103 acres within the near coastal portions of H8lualoa I" through 4"' Ahupua`a (Hammatt 1980). One hrindred and thirty six archaeological Si tcs were recorded on the projQct area, including prc-C ontact ern habitation, agriculture, burial, and ceremonial sites. The Hammatt report recorn nendcd that a heiau (Site 666 1) was significant and should be preserved in place (Harninatt 19M 4), The report also recommended that the single documented burial be relocated to the perimeter of heiau (Site 6661) and preserved. No other sites were reconirriended for preservation. 11. Nelson et al. 2005. An archaeological inventory survey was condU ted by Rechtrrtan Consulting on 28.0 acres located in the Hear coastal portion of Mluatoa 2"" Ahupua`a. A total of 22 sites containing 150 features were recorded. The sites were primarily pre - Contact era agricultural and habitation sites, though five burial sites, a possible Mau, and a trail were also documented within the project area.. 12. Rosendahl 1978, Soehren 1980a,'4 olforth et al, 2000. P'HRI conducted an archaeological inventory survey of eight acres of coastal Hots}alua _3"t Ahupua'a and recorded seven archaeological sites including three Historic era rock xalls, thrt:c residential sites, and Hikapaia Heiau. 29 13. Barrera 1995, Harm & Henry 20011. Bari -era (1995) recorded a possible burial platforni. two habitation sitc, agriculturai rock cls aring mounds and modified outcrops. during a reconnaissance SUI ti ey of 17 acres in near coastal. Holualoak 2'0 Ahupua`a, Haun and Associates conducted an archaeological inventory sur-vCy of the property and recorded 12 sites with 1.04 features (Ha un and Henry 2(M0:14). The majority of features (n=82) were pre -Contact era agricultural rock clearing mounds. Eleven permanent habitation and one temporary habitation feature were also recorded during the study. 14. Rusendahl 1989, PHRl conducted an archaeological field inspection of 6.0 acres of land just below Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway in Halualoa 2°d Ahupua`a Several modified outcrops were recorded in the letter report. There were no outer archaeological features identified on the project area. 1S. Schilt 1984. The Bishop Nluseurn conducted an archaeological study of the Kuakini Highway Realignment Project located roughly along present day ween iia'ahurnanu Highway and recorded 39 sites Puapua'a 2"d eared. H61ualoa I' and 2nd Ahupua-a. Twenty two of the sites were pre -Contact to early past -Contact era agricultural gardcas and modified outcrops (rock clearing). There were also imditional habitation platforms and tails, a,� well as Histone era mads and walls recorde=d during tic study, 16. NVaIker and Rosendahl 1988, Graves and Goodfellow 1993, and Maly and Rosendah112[006. An archaeological survcy (Walker and Rosendahl 1988), an archaeological data recovery study (Graves and Goodfellow 1993), and an archaeological preservation plan (Male and Roseudahl 2006) were conducted by PHRi. Inc. for 104 acres in the upland region of I'uapua'a 2"`° Ahupua'a. A total of 67 sites were documented within the project area, including traditional (KFS) sites, temporary habitation sites, three burials, and a heiew. The archaeological preservation plan recommended that the three burials be relocated to the heiau site, and that the heiau be preserved as a formal historic preservation area (Maly and Rosendahl 2006). 17. ilarrarnatt vl al. 1992. An archaeoloical survey was conducted by Cultural Su«eys Fkw, •ai' i on 174 acres of land in the upland region ofHolualoa 1", 2", and 3" Altupcia-a. The project area lands had been heavily bulldozed during the modern era l -,or ranching; and agricultural purposes. Despite the bulldozing. seventy one sites were recorded during the study, including temporary habitation features, ruck walls, agricultural features, and 30 three burial sites. Many of the sites were determined to be associated with Historic era ratichin�g and agriculture. 18. Shren 19806. Soehren conducted an archaeological reconnaissance survey of 16.0 acres above (ween 1Ca`ahumanu Highway in the inland region of Holualoa V4 Ahupua`a (Soehren 1980b). A single enclosure was identified during the survey. 19. Rechtman 2006. An archaeological inventory survey was conducted by Rechtman C011ski1611g. I..1:.0 on a roughly cine -acre parcel located inakai of Queen Ka'ahumauu Highway in H&Iualoa 2'd Ahupua`a. Two rack walls were recorded on the project area. The report recommended no further work at the wall sites. 20. M. Rosendahl 1988, Fager & Graves 1993. Fager and Graves (1993) coaductc:d an archaeological ins eritory survey of 17.0 acres just mauka of Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway in HC51ualoa P Ahupua`a. Seventeen sites containing 27 pre -Contact to early post -Contact era agricultural features, including ruck mounds, modified outcrops, C- shaped enclosures, terraces, walls, and rack enclosures, were recorded. 21. Dircks cat til. 2013. Rcchtman C onsultirg conducted an ambacologica.l inventory smr ev of 10.266 acres of land located between 840 and 920 ft atrtsl in H61ualoa I" and 2`ti`1 Ahupua`a. One Historic cra to modern era honlestead. agriculturc site (Miyose Pati) containing 149 lcalures was rccorrICd &ITing the survQy 22. Desilets et al. 2004. Desilcts ct al. (2004) conductcd an archacological inventory survey of 11.7 acres of land in the Wpa a region cfH61uarloa. 1" Ahupua`a_ A single site associated with Historic era and modern era homesteads, commercial agriculture (coffee), and ranching was recorded. Features included rock walls, roads, coffee terraces. and buildings. 23. Rechtman 2013. Rechtnlan ConsultitiL, conducted -,md archaeological inventory survey of 29 acres of land located in the 'ci7rc w region of Halualoa 1" Ahupua`a, Twenty four sites were recorded.. The majority of the sites were associated with Historic era and hood m era homesteads, commercial agriculture. Features inclL11-b2 l rock walls, reads, and remnants of'structures. A sin.glc pre -Contact era to early poli -C Comet era resideritial and agricultural site was also recarcic I 31 24. Clark & Rechtman 2006. Rec;lltman Consultin-1 c011ducted ars archaeological inventory survey of 2.7 acres ofland located in the `lipa'a region ofH€aluarlua 151 Ahupua`a_ Six sites were recorded, including five ranch wails and an area of coffee terraces. A number of conclusions can be made from the previous archaeological studies. A primary conclusion is that the majority ofhabitatifln features, especially peniianent habitation i'eatures, are located from the coast to about 360 ft amsl, below the present day Queen Ka'athumanu I IiVLd way, The same is trite of ceremonial features, burials„ and, to a lesser extent, agricultural I-CAtures. The density of agricultural features and habitation features, mostly temporary habitation features, in the upland regions between 360 fl: amsl and 700 ft ams] is much lower than the site density in the coastal kula and lower kahi'ilhe regions of the KFS. The pre -Contact traditional Havvaiian settlement and agricultural patterns are strongly oriented to the kola and lower kahi Whi regions. Even though cattle ranching and commercial ;agriculture may have removed some archaeological sites from the ground surface in the kalu'idu region, there appear to be fewer sites than at lower elevations. The inajarity of sites in the kolri )du region are KFS agricultural sites including rock clearing mcturi&,1110dificcl OL11crops, gardcn enclosures, and low garden walls. Within the lands of the current project, it is clear that ranch ng and commercial agricultural practices have rcrnovecl and damaged iiiar,y of the }arc -C olitact era sites from [lie gamed surface (see the l aiiinlatt c9 al, 199 '�ur11ntary bC1w' ). Moreover, many of the sites identified near the current project area are associated with Historic era ranching* and commercial agriculture. A second conclusion is that the establishment of Historic era homesteads, ranches, and commercial. agriculture seems to have removed. or obscured. the majority of pre - Contact era sites in the upper kt lu `uhi and lower Wl)a `a regions. It alight he that pre - Contact uses in these regions did not involve the construction of large or pertnanctit r',:,i r s, as in the lower regions of Kona. It is also likely that Historic era ranching, and cominercial agriculture in the lower `dipa n region have caused large settle land alterations through the use of bulldozers for pasture and garden. It is possible that traditional features were disassernblecl to build rock walls. and coffee terraces. 32 25. Escott & Escott 2019. SCS conducted an archaeological inventory survey on a 5.0 - acre portion of Parcel 017 (Escott and Escott 2018) and recorded twenty -twee new archaeological sites within the project area (`l`ableW 4 and Figure 10). Fittee n of1he sites are single-featiure sites. The remaining seven agricultural sites contained two to seven features. A majority of the sites are agricultural terraces and complexes dating to the pre- Contact era to the Historic era. The agricultural complexes are located in the lower kcrltr die zone, between 600 and 700 feet (182 to 213 meters) arnsl. Three of the ranch walls (Site #50-10-37-30595, #50-10-37-30601, and 450-10- 37-3065) are the primary dividers ofthe five -acre project area. 1111 site numbers in tltiis report are preceded by the numerical prefix #50-10-37, and hereafter only the last five digits of the site number is rrsed. The historic era walls have typical characleristics of`ranch walls including cobble care fill and hi -faced inward sloping walls toward the top. Whey are approximately 1.0 meter tall. Site 30602 and 30603 are Historic era ranching and agricultural enclosures constructed along wall Site 30595 and wall Site 30601. These two wall sites are constructed onto the west edge of the Site .30592 railroad berm and post-date the railroad berm. The northern third ofthe project aTea only has two sites (Site 30591 and 30956). Site 30591 is art agricultural complex with six terraces. Portions of the sites were bulldozed in the early Modern era. Both sites date to pre -Contact to early Historic era. The terraces reflect Kana Field System features but are roughly constructed that more closely me mble Historic era conLmercial agriculture. Site 30956 is a rectangular Historic style hearth. The middle one third of the project area between wall sites 30595 and is within the bulldozed "terraces" portion of the project area. Site is a pre -Contact era to early post -Con taut era 18va tube burial. The burial wlII be preserved in place in accordance with a Burial Site Component of Preservation Plan. Site 30594 is an agricultural terrace coniplex diat resembles the Kona Ficld System but is inure roughly constructed. .Artifac€s recovered from subsurface testing at Sits ;i.a604 suggest it is a Historic era agricultural terrace. 33 Table 4: lnventory of ArohAwlegical Sitrs ldrnl 5cd on the A.14 Project area (L:scott and Emott 2019). Site #3 * Site Type Features Site Function ALge Testing ,30591 Agri L:L11hffal iv'o11 plox, f5 Agriculture Pi56?-Ct11 iwt to Hip#edc Fru 30592 RMITOLLll Berl und. Bcrm I Tra isportatiun Historic Era 3059; 30594 I.AkI I ube 1511r1a1 Agricultural Complex 1 6 Burial Agriculture Pre -[:edict iu EarlyPosl-Cintact Era Pre -Contact to Histo is LLa SP -I 30595 Rcx:k wall I Ranching Historic Em 30590 11mrth I Ftuxi Prgmmlicm Historic Era 'I U-1 30597 Rock Wall L Ram2liing Historic Erd 30598 [;tock Wall I AgdC Jlute•'Kariehing 1 oi>,ta Itoiligmio bra 30599 Plafform & Enclosure ? Ra1iching Agriculture Historic Era SP -J & 2_ TU -.l 30600 Tcrracc I Aum:1111 ura Historic Era 5P-1 301501 RLIC1,'4k all I Ranidling Hi;w ork Era 30642 L'Slt'b.,L o I Ranch inL -AL, Historic Era 5P-1. 2.3 & 4 30603 3[]bti4 Lw.;lckwre Agricultural Complex 4 d K>llFihmm A:2nwlture A-r,Li1hL1rC Hitaorlc Era Pre—Contact to Historic Ea SP -1 & 2 SP -I 30605 Rock WrilI I 1i,Lmihm.L: : I.,riculture Histwic Em :ilfd)dfHi kWk Wall I It;l1r.°11i;1- ,1:5r ullruae T'rc i;'a�lxt(rct to �tolic J'1'11 W15^ :lc-riCUILu,u . Complex A41 Pr.: Cor IucLtu Historic L-ru SP -I is SP ID 41JP7(!5 .51,1i'I!'I haltluLllrv. 1._ll:6,lite �1rHLi(HL Sini,:iur. LIi4,IoricEra tJ: I.tCIC E[:i 111G5117 ;I 1(d i. { Tcrrati. 1yt�rl L:Ld ral'�,-mplc,. 1 A.Lirwu,01UJr .A L�i1c' iI III L! Pro—ContkwLto Hiswi'11' I'.f'.1 Plc 't}I�1iXTL in Hi0ol ii I I:I SP -1 �} p% —I. Ae a%a Bli ivi L)llml, IJ1-1 ,1 k; I:: 1-H ',1L 11111) IIJ , m -L? h: xtiJt l by the prefix 511-1 (1_ � -_, MIS% .0 r1F KEY SIT r NK91 PRCUF(-T ARFA SITE SJI'V WHINDAR) RAILROAD BED ROCK WALL ThJ V 1141, mo W R 211 ti %tTF % N1 I' V lam C TC 34 Iti V-1 al' H V YK4:17 LI o A 4T%3 iJjl 44,11 \% z Figure 10: 7-5-Minutc Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Locations of Escott and Escott (2.01 8) AIS Project Area Archaeological Sites (ESR17 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle). 35 The southern third ol'the pro}jest area, south of wall Site 30605, contained six primarily aeric uCturtl sites (SI te 30598, 30600„ 30606, 30607. 30610, and 3061 l) and [bur h istoric era sites (Site 30599, 30608, 30609, and 341612) with functions other than agriculture. The a6llicultural features included rack walls (Site 30598 and306O6), terraces (Site 30600 and 30610), and agricultural complexes with terraces (Site 30607 and 30610). The non-agricultural features included three enclosures (Site 30599, 30608. and 341(55)9), and a refuse disposal arca lava glister (Site 30612). The cluster of these sites indicates their use for Historic era commercial agriculture. Twenty --nine shovel probes and two excavation units tested the sites. Marine shell fragments, a basalt flake and volcanic -glass flakes recovered during testing indicate that Hawaiians likely used the area for limited agricultural pcirfroses. However, the agricultural terraces more closely resemble (lie remains of Historic era commercial a ,riculture. All 22 sUcs identified during; the eurrLnl AIS study were assessed sigmiticant under criterion Lod" as they are likely to yield information. important to history. The railroad berm is also sivnilic:ant under criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a signi f cant contribution to the broad patterns of our history and it embodies distinctive ekaracteristics of the type, period, and method of railroad lied cotistructiom The railroad berm was reconomended for preservation with preservation nt4asures outlined in an archaeological preservation plan (Rcott and Mello 2019b). The rest of the sites require no fuer work, The burial is also significant under criterion "e" as it has important value to Hawaiian people and people ofother eihnic backgrounds in the state. The burial was recommended for preservation in place with preservation treat»>ents, outlined in a Burial Site Component of a Preservai ion Plan (Lseou and Mello 2019a). 36 CURRENT PROJECT AIRF -1 SPF C.."I FIC PREVIOUS ARCH AF,t]LOGY Lands of the current AIS study were subject to an AIS study conducted by Hammatt et al. (1992). That study encompassed 66.039 acres of land within the currerit project area located between '320 to 610 feet (99 to 210 meters) antst [TMK, (3) 7-6- 021:016 and 017) (see Figure 9, Prgject #17). The current project area is located within the northern portion of the Hammatt et al. (1992) project area. Twenty one arehaeological sites and two areas Of bUlldozed modern planting "terraces" were recorded in the A1S report (Figure 1 I and Table 5). Eight of the 21 archaeological sites (51HP 450-10-37-10015, #50-10-37-10017, #50-10-37-1001s, #50- 10-37-10020, #50-10-37-10031, #50-10-37-10033, #50-10-37-10034, and #50-10-37- 1+0049, hereafter abbreviated to the last five digits) were recorded by CSH in tabular format only. Written descriptions of the remaining 13 sites are in the CSH AIS report. Excavations were conducted at ten of the 13 sites. The AIS report included plan view figures for four of the 13 sites. At the request of SHPD, additional -site documentation for Sites 10011, 10012, 10031, 10049, and 10071 was submitter) to SHPD in a Ieticr report (Hamman and Shideler 2007). Six of the sites Nverc dctenniiwd to be pre -Contact tra. four associated with habitation. one with agriciiItLire. and one single feature site (Silo 100 12) contained two burials. Fifteen of the dies were determined to be Historic era sites. the. majority associated with coffee agriculture and cattle ranching. Two Histone era habitation sites were also documented in the AIS study. The burials at Site 10012 were removed and reinterred off -project prior to 1983 (see Appendix A Reinterment Documentation). The site was further excavated to ensure that all 1wi had been removcd. The site was then back-filled and leveled by bulldozer. The AIS recommended no further work at all 21 sites documented in the Current project area. The Hammatt and Shideler (2007) letter report repeated the AIS recommendation that "all surface sites in the area were documented" in the AIS report and that "significant material from the study area has been recovered and that further investigation would be ofmininium productivity'- (Hanirnatt and Shideler 2007.11). However, the authors recommended that the sites should be relocated to document their current conditions and to document the sites to prevailing SHPD AIS standards. 37 YItul 4is PI e waw a, Figure 11: 7.5-Mirnute Series USOS Topographic Map Skming Localion of"Nrarthcrn Portion of ]-Hamman 0 al, (1992-) Site's and CurTent Project Area (ESRT, 2011. Sources. National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekua Quadrrngie). 33 Table 5; 1 avenlory of Pre violimly Recorded .a1 ogica I Siies I HOMITY.1111 0 II. 1992, Hamman and Sbideler 2()(07). Sillpf Cs" STTEA TYPE FUNcrION AGE 1143CUMENTA111ON EXCAVATION CULTURAL NMTERIAL I I kill 12 J 1 (1 Flulkwil I Ala. 1 Icallm Burtul i bbmAtl Lill llztiW,lhirw Vruhi� tom! FriW,5 lune Ucsudpdom Deampbm. Urso-jlA& 1.5 m I EIRE mmdl Lnux Femur 4.5 hqx mou taFie -i cc,wTlr ihdh. Bldnal r6nward off-pm.[ecr Fie frahu-ch & plehn isioc ariffacts Mirform &I W'd] E&in nchisarr La Tube 1{iU7-1L 10015 13 Temom koaO 15cd limoriti 1 011 7 1 Pwfoftll .. I.-arl, Fomp lii,lori, IM18 If, ridfl.qlilT,, k I.&i1mil.111 1114itilor i,: I Im 19 17 0 Rock Mounds 1S.g climmmg Hworiw DL rl Ir o i- 3 L.41 m wdr trrnohn Mcull Flic I W24.1 18 PlAlfouth A4. civarmIt I 11,11-1,1-k D -c npimi IO031 110 bu1mure Wall Ap-milikim 111,wrlti De-kripumi 1W33 112 pbli coftil 117clff�e Ag Itimirik; I 1+ I IR134 113 pirifilml AL. 11cannu lliftric I IAJ49 -116 Teri an AgricuLturr 1115miric D,lljr or MIMI 232 Tema-, Hshitullon PreWsmiric 1.0 X 1.0m VG & a s;jnffl anki,mili ofiWLWL`n firo icium: I f&li 233 Enctoiurr 11-11.3himinn Prehistoric De.,-.6plion & plamle, 0.5 X 025 ni SIFLAil OMW[ll Lft 1111LI(IM I ffifig '34 M lKlifled Uilff Malform Habimlioo Iliwric D4,- 1111r,iWt (1.4; N 0 i Ilk V(! S311AII :llkkhlnT !, f 1n1L1dV; 1 I U071 �315 - 1 -M)HILL [ '1Gkl*jre 111,"%rMTm Ap"rute llmorik; 114 k IlrSad> Dnk-r"iau I n X o,S ilk Nomlii�,os 111switkirgan Pffdd5T43riC Jill) 7.1 i3ls Will] ALL C1vlLri11_U ffkiofic Demupiluo 7.0 in swm wm[ No ims small itimwi1 of -MS ul 'ILL _2 I 1H 1-- 7 234 Mmi�i-rm, K Ffi,I—iire Ftanehiihg Aq. Hi.,wric Ekercripsma H X H1 I —,S m..squue Ictill I 'I c M 1. 11,1 ri,: 1:111• 11111-14 140 1 ndunmf Coffee Ucrk 1111--tiuic Dncriptmll IM75 141 LmAusqirr P;g Pen Hisioric [:lescn piimj. 111hinview. & Pr' Me ' Site Umbers arc preLvded Ity the prefim 50-10-37, 39 In a latter to the County ofHawai'i Department of Planning dated July 30, 2018, (Log. No. 2018.00878 Doc. No. 2018.00878), 511PD requested a new pedestrian survey to identify all archaeological historic properties present on the project area, and to update previous archaeolohlical documentation to include site plans for each site with site boundaries and areas impacted by bulldozing, photographs of all sites and features, an assessment of their integrity. and site significance. EXPECTED ARCHAEOLOGICAL PATTERNS Based on previous archaeological studies, geological studies, historical research, interviews, and County Planning Department records it is expected that any archaeological sites remaining on the current project area will be related to traditional pre -Contact era agriculture, temporary habitation., burial practices, and to early post - Contact era nrid Historic era ranching and agricultural activities. II is likely that many of the pre -Contact to early post -Contact era sites have been removed or disturbed by Historic era and modern ranching and commercial agriculture. This is especially tnie because the area around the current! project era was used as cattle pasture and coffee fanning from the Historic era to the present. Additionally, the project. area is in a location that wa -, bulldozed sometime between the 1940s and the 1970s in preparation for a conmicrcial agricultural project. most likely coffee �Jro-ving. Aerial photos clearly show that bulldn7er transects wort cut north/south across the entire, five - acre project area. Archaeological sites and features that are likely to remain on the project area will likely include pre -Contact era to early past -Contact era rock clearing mounds, terraces, small enclostires. platforms. and burials. It is also likely that Historic era and modern features related to ranching and agriculture will also be identified on the project area. These include primarily rock walls constructed to confine cattle. 40 Rf:4i 1.f4 OF FIELDWORK Seventeen of the twenty one previously identified archaeological sites were located during the course of the archaeological inventory survey study (Figure 12 and Table 6). All site numbers in this report are preceded by the numerical prefix #50-10-37, and are abbreviated to the last five digits. Two of the previOUsly documented sites (Site 10420 and Site 10034) relocated by SCS are natural bedrock outcrops and one site former burial site (Site 10012). The burials at Site 10012 were reinterred off -project in 1.993. The four remaining previously documented sites (Sites 10017, 10033, 10049, and 10071) were bulldozed Prior to the SCS fieldwork and the remains of the sites are no longer present on the ground surface. Three previously undocumented sites were also TC—Corded, including a portion of the railroad beam (Sits; 30592), a small coffee shed enclosure (Site 31181), and several ranch walls (Site 31182). A single petroglyph on loose cobble was recorded as Isolated Find I (IF -1). A total of 21 sites, 17 previously documented and four newly documented, were identified on the project area and are documented in this report. Two of the sites (Site 10420 and Site 10034) were dctcr-mined to be natural geological features. Six of the situ were determined to be pre -Contact era. three associated with habitation, one with aga•iculturc. a single petroglyph site, and one slagle feature site (S ite 100 12) formerly contained two burials. Twelve of the sites were determined to be Historic Ora sites, the majority associated with coffee agricUlture and cattle ranching. Two Historic era habitation sites were also documented in the AIS study, One site (Site 100 15) was determined to be a short segment of modern bulldozer road. The burials at Site 14012 were removed and reinterred off -project prior to 1993 with the approval of the Hawaiian Island Burial Council (HIBC) and SHPD. The site was further excavated to ensure that all ivtJ had been removed. The site was then back- filled and leveled by bulldozer. The following site summaries include infortnation from the CSH archaeological studics (Harruttatt et al. 1992, llummatt and Shideler 2007) and new information dvcurnented during the current AIS resurVcy used to updated site documentation. 41 i XOrrip 4 -Ylliklli 1 %KI,A ..fF a:.. 1w4Ti 0 ., 4 - OU It4ll"Itim.H AN '+111 MIA I - M[11..11.A7Y1►.F.11 Mir Jw;Y§I! IN4441111{P+iFf4sIL ILtI. iI..t7LRt. 1., X41F 111x1 F 14 YL Slit' MALL, r% I+ �I t V4 "I WI IIYf IAI EOf1 - IIIa O 09 �- "A� C, Om 101 Mil 41 K:1.0 7�E:kdld pls " r IgoI {1)4 luol p LIQ W1 I:4#ti1�A "I IVAN,.[aII"7 Yip^w �1 1u111Gi r JrHUYIl 1 wNl 100 , AN 31 11Ikk 14 .! uw � � 1u117IO . �X AC Y,nX.Xl1� YI Figure 12: 7.5-Minuic Serirs USGS'l UPi_7LM11a111u Map Slki"ino Location of zVdiaeolvgical STs and Pmjecl r' FCr L i LSR1, 2011. Souecc - Nattomil Googmphic Society. l,SCjS, Y%C"t1 ikokua Qwlkhangle), 4 2? 'fable 6: LIVenfory of Hamiatt et al. (]992) Archaeological Site and C'urrela _114 Results. SwJ)4- TYPE FUNCTION A£rL. OCK C 3I h., l %f It N EXCAVATIONS DISPOSflION WDL L Phnfram Ag.,TcnT HuhoUdoa Pir-CmU L D"ri11puUn. Plan i PI 1u I,,- 7.5 in Imig trmcll- TU -I Kcculded I GDL'_ PLLTfwfn K %-.III [iutial Ptt•f°tnll-irr I Irkrm.1111um, Pliki1. I'1-'1!1: & Mims Finite Fearure Renin -1- No I,mgeT Pteseill I tO D Lndmum & Lava I OX 11ahilatiun I'Tr-Cmoac, DL5cnv iOn. Plan & Vh-+,r 4 S m squam. iota Rcc'mded 100Ia BLIIJtktaetl Road Trwsporlauiun Msed"'I I7k6s-rlltn-m N a 14NWrl Rood Red 10017 P1LrlRrtrl COPIte.Rmnip Ih,wiit Iiriwlur IN A Bulldomd-No LuagaPmk im ldilifl Enclalwre Agrlcultura! IL."urit EeacriptumL 1, A Pariially Bulldwed 1400 6 Rock Mcwl3d& Ag. C leetutg i Li%wric DescHptinn 3 .0 11, x 1.0 m tnrnchn Iktswded IODZO lIXl3I BCdWC7_0U%LW Inslosurr_Wall Oco,iiin,,11-FHTn[M Alelal uln¢i.' ::Lilroil Il:wo:niL lk-riphiin f7c;, rr':pl 1,111 ,C Phofu N,A h1 Mmord VI ils Ai; kam>1ngjC.R''STW RC asi lill IgD33 PlalttirtgCompkcL C01 cu hg I11swric lhsrnpLwd N,A BLllldozLd - Nu LuugerPt%,Sen1 10014 MmIn rk C%LI mp Gailugi nd Feutura Natural LM---nPtMIL N; A N utuml - Nul un A.rahu aLoOmL Sftu 1(10441 Turrets AL*UIILLrr Iiwmic 13escnntian NA BLIHOxd-Nr'I.LalxrPM.Wnt I fIfW,7 I MiGh TWTr?E; Lnclnsarc Hahsir;�ds s Itshltution 1'j, ­i' 4c.:r Pre-L"'BIL' r I Sr.w cip4 m. PI411. & Phk)Ta,s D pt... R. PI,Ln. & Photas I fl x I m 0.5 X 0.25 m R4 Lsrd d NIC „11V 111®1111OWU 1 I](}ti`s') Modified fII11ff-Phirfurm I1dLi}6mLL011 I L -W l li Do, mipliori & I"hu[{yy 0.5 X 0.5 rti Fi&oI'11.'d 10070 U-Slinro Encla:ure Apieulturt Himmiu Dewriprion, P L11 & Pllta., . I.11:1C [1.5 m Reewded I f071 Plm fc nl Hjhimtn 011 PTE-CUmact IDcscriplii 1 N A BLl11d11MI - ND I- lnEXr PLr;ent I Qoe2 C'w2pier Alt. Ue-miq Der ipcmm. P lan & PhiAON ? 11 rli AIkw r ri;a rl IC<LLrrcltrt 111iPn Corlsplex RmwhiTWA.g, Iliucu a Drwnpnan-Plus & PhLrtas TL` -1 & TIT -2 Rfewded. 10074 Gn4ursvre Coffee W'ofk SIA I listclriv DNCTiP6011. P Inn & PhLPIOu 1 ?5 m squire 101x1 fi&mded 10075 E.nclul uw PIPPen [AkImic Deseripcinn,Pl:mh & Photos - R, -corded 3U592 ROilrout Bcrm Trimstvrtulmn Ntrrric De.wnprinn-Plum & PhLrias N A Rreruded IF -I PNrrivypll MILIO. PT+ed'LIffV 4t ISextijlcwm. Plan & Photo, N,A Fto;Lltdad 311114L fnclnsmrc cvltfcc WarkSW Hisixiv Dmscrip6am, Plan & Pho - Rtcurdcd. 311 92 Ru.k 14'4I11s Runchitig & Ag. Ilistoriv 1Dv."pvum_ RW & Phu WA Recwded Site rwmhers arc prm:Wc4lsy thr nTrfiN 50-167-37-. Ormrge 5hmding - Skir w I nngm Par;cm PriNii Shrul ig - Nalurg gaol npcal icstture. Not an ILrkllae+llujlicai site. 43 SIRP 10011 Platform FUNCTION: Agriculiurail Rock Clearing/Temporary I Iabitation AGE: Pre -Contact era DIMENSIONS: 7.50 m in length by 5.0 ni wide by 0.86 rn in height: (max) CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: Altered: retains integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: CSIJ 1.5 ni trench, SCS TU -1 2.4 m by 1.2 rn DESCRiPTION: S1HP 10011 is a pre Contact era rectangular Aortic plaillorm located at 445 ft ams]. in the southern portion of the project area (see Figura 12)_ The platform is approximately 7.50 m by 5.0 rn wide, with a maximum height of 0.86 m (Figure 13). The platform is constructed of angular and subatigular cobbles and small boulders piled ancl stacked two to three caurse, hi�L1l1 along the perimeter rind gilled with large pebbles, cobbles and small boulders (Figure 14 and Figure 15). Portions of the perimeter are very roughly faced (Figure I and Fi"ure 17). The top surface ofthc platform is slightly uneven and is paved witlh large pebbles, cobbles, and small boulders (see Figure I3 and Figure 15). Portions or the north and west sides have collapsed. The CSH AIS interpreted that the platform to be a prehistoric agricultural rock clearing mound, based on formal COnStructiOn acid sire, though they noted that Lhe feature has 1omial construction elcmcnt�, suggesting possible use other than an agricultural rock clearing. CSH EXCAVATION 12ESULTS: CSH excavated a 1.5 m wide trench throu-17 the platform (see Figure 13) and recovered three cowrie shell fragments. The form, construction method and location of the Jcaturc suggest that the feature could be a temporary habitation platform used periodically during agricultural activities. However, the near absence of cultural material recovered from the CSH excavation suggests the platform is a pre -Contact era rock clearing mound. 44 KEY LQ -INAs%E l f (will l 2-Ti'U BLED h1%%.t11 (4,)BBl E. �t�s - implu sloN to TREE �a--I - IIF IGHT.ABU16 E til RFA UL Figure 13: Site 10011 Plan View Mala. 45 K 1 e t m = Figure 14: Photograph of Site 1001 t. Looking East. 46 Figure IS; Ill ill Ll_r:rltihoi'Sil T(l)]I Toga Surilw , I.00kln7 5gmIIlti3'LtiI, 47 Figure 16: Plk"gmph of Site 1011 t t South Edge Comtruction, Looking Nus-th. 48 figure 17: llhotogrjpli i,l'SiLc J00 I %1 O,l I'Ah-IC t011-SUU luas Ula d C.uilalme, Lookiiti_r Nortisc,st. 49 SCS EXCAVATION RESULTS. SCS excavated a 2.4 in long (NIS) by 1.2 m wide test unit (TU -1) in the southeast quadrant of the platform (see Fi iwre 13). TU -1 was excavated as an architectural layer and three natural stratigraphic layers, and terminated on bedrock (Figure 18 through Figure. 20). The natural stratigraphic layers were excavated in arbitrary 14 cat? levels. The Arehitedur'l Layer (45 cin maximum thickness) cmisistcd of angular and subangular pebbles, cobblesand small boulders with a small amount of decomposing organic detritus. There were fio cultural deposits nr sLibsurfacefeatures in the architectural layer. The LOp surlace of the architectural layer was a fairly level cobble paving. The architectural layer continue into Layer I and terminated on bedrock approximately 40 cin to 45 cm below the top surface of the feahrre. Layer I (0-I0 curbs) was Clark brown (I OYR3I3) loose sanely silt loann with blocky pods and 40% cobbles, pebbles and small boulders. The rock excavated in Layer 1 was architectural roe k- The architectural layer continued into Laver 11 below. Layer I terminated on bedrock on the northern half and the southern end of the unit. In the south half of the unit, the base of Layer 1 terminated on Layer 11 sediment and was fairly level and clear, There were no artifacts in Layer 1, Layer 11(10-26 cnih,;) was very dark grayish brawn ( I OYR3l2) soft sandy silt with 30°lo cobbles anal small boulders excavated from the south half of TU -1. The rock excavated in Layer Il was architectural rock and fragments of exfoliated bedrock- Layer 11 was excavated as a 10.0 cm Level I and a 6.0 cm Level 2. The bottom portion of Layer Il, Level 10 5-20 curbs) contained a small annount of charcoal flecking, five small pieces of burnt wood (0.48 grams), a small coral fragment (4.9 g) and two very small fragments of vara shell (0.17 g). Layer IL Lcvcl ,? (fid not contain artifacts. Small, thin d"sits of very line Pahala ash were identified in portions of the base of Layer 11, Layer II terminated on bedrock along the southern end of TLS -1 and terminated on Layer Ill sediment near the middle of TU -1. The boundary between Layer Il and Layer Ill was fairly level and clear. Layer 111 (26-90 crnnbs) was yellowish brawn (10YR.5. 4) loose fine silt with 50" "F bedrock cobbles excavated near the middle of TU -1, Layer III slid not contain artifacts. 50 Figure IS: Sete 10011 Tc,,t Unit I tiVi!tit Pi file - 51 - i w n d rAk t Figure 19; Photograph of Site ]OP I t Test Unit I West Profi10 Looking �4c;f 52 ,1 Figure 20: Photogaph of Site 10011 Test Unit 1 Overview Looking Northeast. 53 Site 10011 was interpreted by CSH as a pre -Contact era agricultcu-al rack clearing mound (ACM) based an the 1iniiLed amount ot'cu.ltural material recovered from excavation. TU -1 artifacts reccw creel earring the current AIS study were similar in type and numbers. However, the size and c OnStruction of the platform suggest a temporary habitation component. It is possible that the feature was originally constructed by clearing rocks from surrounding agricultural fields and piIinti- tltem on an exposed bedrock outcrop. However. the completed platform is well constructed wl-(h a stacked rock perimeter and level cobble paved :surface. The platform ills similar to other temporary habitation platl'oniiw identi fled in forth Kona. The small number of artifacts recovered from test excavations suggests the platform had limited uSe, likely as a location For resting and while conducting seasonal gardening. It is also likely that the platform is a late pre -Contact era, or even early post - Contact era feature that was abandoned sc on alter completion and use. The area surrounding Site 10011 has been impacted by grazing cattle and heavy equipment. The platforny h&,; been altered by pasture clearing, is partially collapsed and is in fair condition. No further work is recommended at Site 1001 l . 54 SIHP 10012 Former Burial Platform FUNCTION: Burial (RcinteiTed Elsewhere) AGE: Pre Contact era DIMENSIONS: 26 ft. in longi; by 12 11. wide, with a rnaxini nt height of ft. CONDITION: No longer present INTEGRITY: Altered, does not retain integrity SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: Entire DESCRIPTION: SIHP 10012 was an ,n :d�h.,w d platform located at 410 ft ams] approximately 511.0 m north of Site 1001 1 i.cc 11 figure 12). The following description is from Hammatt et at. (1992). The platform was ''?6 feet long by 12 feet wide with a maximum height of 4 feet (Figure 21 ). There was no clearly defined level upper surface, paved terrace or rock alignments. The surrounding area was been bulldozed ar3jacent to the site on all sides except the south side. The site appeared to have been disturbed by Allis grading and ulcer were racks bulldozed onto the feature from the north side. CSH EXCAVATION RESULTS: The upper 2 to 3 feet ofrock fill was removed from the around and a rcctangulat alignment mcasuring 12 by 15 feet was cxpciscd. At the base of the rock fill and partially burying the stone aligninew was stratum 1 light brown silt loam containing organic debris containing volcanIc glass, borle and coral artifacts, and adze flakes. Ott the ofukcar or west side of the site were two stone cLipl)oards with a corbelled construction_ These cupboards measured 2 feet in diameter and the interior spaces were one foot high. They appeared to be contemporaneous with the construction of the rectangular aligniment.. After exposing the rectangular alignment and the cupboard, the interior of the rectangular alignment was excavated. Directly underlying Stratwn I in the alignment interior and under the cupboards was a second stratum, designated Stratum II. This was a light grey unconsolidated silt loam which contained wood ash and cultural material including stone, shell and bane artifacts and midden. As this stratum was excavated, a 3 foot wide by 5 foot long stone crypt was exposed. The crypt consisted of a rectangular arrangement of squared boulders. 5 bedrOCK } r I 1 PLAN � ni 4 1 2 0 q �' r SEC17ON A zupboards CUpbc€ardDourial !I Str. I _ • 5 r �l.7Y ~r ~ y SECTION B 5tlr it (reworked) Figure 21: Site 10012 ( SH Site 10) flan View Map and Excavation Profiles (Hamman et al. 1992:65). 56 The; crypt fill was removed (S(ratum 11) and the skeletal remains of two individuals was uncovered at a depth of'2 feet below the trap of the crypt and resting directly on bedrock. Two skulls were lying 1 inch apart at the northeast end of the crypt and in both cases were ar iculateyd to the vertebrae. The skull can the north gide was of an adult female. [Hamrnatt et al. 1992:64] The unfused cranial sutures particularly the coronal suture also show a mature but young age. The skull was articulated to the vertebrae and the scapulae, the clavicles and the pelvis were all in articulated pnsition. An examinatior of the sacrum and hip hone show characteristics of a female. All long banes were absent inclucl111g tibia, fibulae ulna, radius and humerus. However, the articulated hands and feet had been placed on the pelvis with fingers and teres pointing upwards. The skeleton of the child iananediately to the south was completely articulated and semi flexed. All skeletal pains were present but were in a partially decomposed state. It is clear frorn the stratigraphic context that both skeletons were buried at the sane tirrte. It was not possible to determine the sex of the child. The first molar had partially emerged indicating a child between the age of 4 and 6. There were no anomalies observed in the skeletal parts, A summary ofthe stratigraphic events which occurred at the site are as follows: 1. An enclosure was constructed with roughly stacked boulders on 3 sides and a double alignment of vertical slabs on the other. ?. The enclosure was occupied and used for everyday work activities and food consumption. This resulted in the deposition of Stratum I 1 which includes stone adze fragments and shell and hone artifacts. 3. A stone lined crypt was constructed at the base of the Site and intrusive into the occupation deposits of Stratum 11. 4. Two human skeletons were interred in the crypt, one child (6t--6 years) and one adult female (18-25 years). Before the adult female was interred and while she was still with musculature her long banes were removed and her separated hands and feet were placed can her pelvis, 57 5. Following the internment cif the burial, the cry,pt was tilled and covered wl(h reworked deposits of Stratum II. The two cupboards were constructed on the wc kaj side of the crypt possibly for the purpose of narking the burial site. 6. Stones were piled on the crypt and on the cupboards to create a level living surface and the site was once again occupied resulting in the deposition of Stratum 1 which filtered thrOLIgh the rock fill. 7. During modcrn bulldozing of the area around the site rack,, w•cre piled nn the top and sides giving what was a bevel platform a mound like apivarance. A radiocarbon sample collected 30-40 cmbs and associated with the burial returned a date ofA,D. 1830+-50 (Harninalt et al. I992,107). The burial platform at Site 10012 was Crsrnpletely excavated and the rei-nains were reinterred off -project (see Appendix A Reinterment Documentation). The excavated site was backfilled and leveled with a bulldozer_ The site location was relocated by SCS during; the current AIS study. The present ground surface is 1� vel bulldo7M reek (Figure 22). Site 10012 is no longer present and no fiAher tiWork is icco mended. 58 Figni-L, 22. P11411 LILTF,111� Ili ( TO,Imkl S1 I-CtCL ;I1 Forylicr Si I': 1001 1 ook mY � C) STRIP 10013 Enclosure & Platforms FUNCTION: Habitation AGE: Pre Contact eras DIMENSIONS: 15.3 m long (NWI-SF) by 18.3 in wide, 0.4 m max. height CONDITION: Poor INTEGRITY: Altered: retains integrity of location, setting, materials, and some workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: CSH excavated seven test -units totaling 4.5 square meters DESCRIPTION: SIHP 14013 is a roughly square pre -Contact era enclosure and a small modified lava tube located approximately 200 meters northeast of Site 1001 1 (see Figure 12). As indicated in the CSH AIS report and confirmed by SCS during the current AIS study, the enclosure is nearly square (60 feet long NW/SE by 50 feet wide, exterior dimensions) and is constructed. roughly level ground (Figrure 23). The enclosure walls range from five (5) feet wide can the Maukca side to nearly Len (10) feet wide on the m akai side where the outside facing is three (3) feet high relative to the exterior ground surface on the mcakai side of the structure. The e111closure walls were probably higher originally but at present tliev a1p ar tohared been knocked down by Prey iDus bulldozing operations. The are pritnarily 30 to 50 em in height above the mt]deni ground surface (Figure 24 and Figure; 25:). The walls are constructed of angular and subangular basalt large cobbles and small boulders stacked and piled two to three courses high on the ground surface. They are roughly faced in places. The northwest corner of the enclosure has been bulldozed. The enclosure interior (measuring 35 feet nwakca-wukai by 45 i'ect north -south) was predominantly dirt. with a rock platfiOrm about. 20 feet square situated near the center of the interior. Immediately ra anka 4 5 feet) of the northeast corner of the enclosure was a low, boulder platform about 15 feet by 20 feet (see Figure 23). The platform appears to havo been run over by a bulldozer and is no longer present. There is a one (1) foot square and one (1) feet deep opening in the east corner of the site (see Figure 23 and Trench 7 excavation description below). [Han malt et al. 1992:69]. F" bbw! P I r -de !ceo Ln'Zoval ror e T5 , CCIL' .fisc p:�i-, m Figure 23: Site 10013 Plan View Map Showing Fest Units (Hanimatt et al. 1.992:69). 61 a = " l 7 a1 e' _ fr w Ar - 5 Rr 1 . r J n e w# I .r✓ aY V ""a'" ,- w. ° . � �' ^ .f'� +1. •A, Y --r"1�!'". _ .. �I"iF t b k" �t �s , • F n d f P Z„ ..% �`�� � _ d i"drwXPM � � .rp,.. � ��r•.td Fy "`Na� e � •fwd .. � �� @ h .. .V i� � �1 .Y- ��y � I..�k -r x j .fir ai �A.''��' tl m 7 r .. -4. Y •-.� meq:. Hgare 26: Plk"grraph of Site 1M3 :Northeast Platform {Left Top Comer) and Tube Opening (Forogr0n1,'e ). I'!S.CjSt. 64 CSH EXCAVATION RESULTS: Close inspection oFthe dirt surface in the interior of Site 10013 showed that the inakai area contained a dark grey to black dirt while in the Riurrka ponion the dirt layer was a reddish brown and generally shallow with exposed bedrock. The rnakrai portion of the site was chosen for the first excavation on the basis of sediment color (grey to black sediments in sites usually being a good indicator of human activity and potential depth. A total of 4.5 square meters (Trenches 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6) were excavated adjacent to the inak-ai wall. Trenches I and 6 established the presence of a single cultural layer tip to 30 cm. thick overlain by 1 t) cm. to 20 em_ of modern Al horizon. These two (2) trenches produced six ({3) basaltic glass flakes, a polished adze Bake and two (2) coral file fragments. Trenches 2, 3 and 5 adjoin one another and are situated in the northwest comer of the site interior. They defined the limits of large rock lined hearth area with muhiple ash lens contained in it. A substantial aniount cif midden matorial was lir€:sent in the hearth (Refer to Table 8). A total of 33 iteins listed as artifacts included a € ne picce bone fish hook fragi-nent, a piece of worked manic al. bone, coral file„ saw and abrader fragments, wane file fragments, polished adze flakes and basaltic glass flakes. Trench 4 was excavated into the platform in the center ofthe structure. bedrock was present at a. depth of only 24 cm. below the rrlatform surface. that being at the level of the dirt surface cif the site in the other trenches. Some midden was present in the gaps in the bedrock and one polished adze tlake and one basaltic glass flake were also recovered from trench 4. [Hammatt et al. 1992:68] A final excavation (Trench 7) was excavated in the platform just mauka of the enclosure. This involved remor'al of rocks to a depth of two (2) meters where a capped calf entrance to a lava tube was Found. The lava tube five (5) feet wide was accessible For lificen 415) feet in a mauka direction.. It was fully explored and was found to exhibit no signs Ofhunlan use. A slight flow of cool air through the tube and the absence of cultural material within the tube suggest that its primary function may have been a source of ventilation for the platform built over it. On the basis of size, thickness of the cultural layer, complexity of the structural remains and the variety of cultural items present Site 14013 is a goad example of a semi-permanent or permanent occupation site. The two (2) plaffor zzs (one inside and one outside of the enclosure) suggest the former presence of pole and thatch structures. The excavations clearly show the primary work area in the site was along the makai edge of the enclosure. [Hammatt et al. 1992:71 ] 65 Site 10013 has been impacted by heavy equipment prior to and following the CSM AIS study and is in poor condition. The majority of the walls of tlrc enclosure have been impacted by bulldozing although portions of the base of the enclosure �",aIIs are visible on the ground surface. No further work is recommended at Site 10013. SIHP 10015 Bulldozer Read Segment FUNCTION: Transportation AGE: Modem DIM I;N 5IONS: 12.0 m long (NIS) by 2.4 rn wide CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: None, not an archaeological site SURFACF ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: No DESCRIPTION: SIHP 10015 is a bulldozer mad edge located 560 1t ams]. is the center of Parcel 017 (see Figure l 2). The site was recorded by CSH as a terrace. SCS relocated the future and alter clearing determined that it is the, edge of bulldozer road cut along a fairly steep slope. The earthen makai edge of the bulldozer road is similar in appearance to an earthen terrace. The feature is not an archaeological site and no further work is mcommcnded. SIHP 10018 Enclosure Remnant FUNCTIW Agriculture AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 5.0 m long (N/S) by 1.0 m wide by 1.0 rn height. CONDITION: Poor INTEGRITY: Altered: retains integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Norte EXCAVATION: No DESCRIPTION: SIHP 10018 is a the remains of an enclosure located at 580 ft amyl 12:0 ni northeast ofSite 10015 (see Figure 12). The site was recorded by CSH as a rectangular enclosure with core -filled walls 0.6 tm (2 to 3 feet) high and 3.0 m by 6.0 m (10 by 20 feet) across the interior dimensions. The walls were I.8 to 2.4 rii. (b to g feet) thick and with much collapsed rubble, Based on the enclosure size and construction. and the presence of ntitnerous coffee trees surrounding the enclosure, CSH interpreted the site to be associated with coffee agriculture. SCS relocated a remnant of the west wall of the enclosure where it is constructed to abut onto the west sine of the Site 31182 Feature 3 wall (Figure 27 and Figure 28). The a all segment is roughly 6.0 m long (N/S) by 1.3 rn wide and is 1.4 m in maximum height. The wall is constructed of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders stacked on the ground surface. The wall is roughly bi-faced and is not core -filled. The north end of the wall has been bulldozed and the north and cast enclosure walls have been bulldozed and are no longer present. Site 10018 was likely an Historic era enclosure likely associated with agriculture or ranching. All but a small portion of the enclosure crest wall at Site 100 [ 9 has been bulldozed_ The remaining, wall has been altered by ranching and bulldozing and is badly collapsed. The site is in poor condition, contains very little integrity and no further work is recommended. SIHP 10019 Dock Clearing Mounds FUNCTION: Agriculrurc AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS: 5.0 in long (N/S) by 1.0 m wide by 1.0 to height CONDITION: Poor INTEGRITY: altered: retains integrity of location and setting SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene FXCAVAITIDN: No DESCR-LP iI N: SIRP 10019 is a complex of six rectangular and oval rack mounds (features A through F) located between 490 and 500 ft amsl 120 m northeast of Site 1 N 13 (see Figure 12). The rock mounds are located around a seasonal -gulch and the site is roughly 20,01 m in diameter. The rock mounds are 2.0 to 3.0 meters in diameter and mange in height from 0.6 to 0.9 rn. The rock mounds are constructed of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled on the ground surface. Several of the rack mounds were constructed by construe ting an outside perimeter of slightly Larger rocks and then infilling them with slightly smaller rocks. This type of rock clearing mound constriction was commonly used in Historic to modern era coffee and sugarcane Fields across Hawaii Island. 67 LI �tlP :DIY X'. LY Intl [Yol kit LUM}fl-ll � 74 41 I �tr�ll�,.l}ti �,�i+. 111II HI x I4'"1 Figure 27: Site 10019 Remnant Enclosul-0 W4 lII Flare V ieW Miil7, 68 ' Y U 7 f , a X CSH EXCAVATION RESULTS: Three of the mounds eA�ere cross sectioned by CSH with one ineter wide trenches oriented mauka-makar. All of the trenches were excavated lo bedrock with no midden material or artifacts occurring. However. in the excavation of feature B a rusted metal file was discovered under a large slab at the base of the inound. This find leaves little doubt that this feature is historic in age and this conclusion is applied to all other features in this complex. Site 10019 was relocated during the current study. The rock mounds are no Longer intact and all that remains are scaitered concentrations of rocks where the inounds were once located. T w rock mounds were either altered by flooding or were knocked over by bulldozing. The location of the rock mounds adjacent to the strcam channel indicates that they are stone agricultur l clearing mounds likely constructed by col Coo planters (I-Ianmia(t et al. 1992:27). Site 10019 has been altered by flooding and bulldozing and is in poor condition. The type, Function and age of the rock clearing mounds was determined through feature construction and text excavations, and no further work is reconnmended for Site 100 19. SIHP 10020 Bedrock Outerap FUNCTION: Natural geological feature. not an archaeological site AGF: NIA DIMENSIONS- 2.4 m long by 3.0 m wide CONDITION- N/A INTEGRITY": NIA SURFACE ARTIFACTS.- None EXCAVATION: No DESCRIPTION: SIHP l D020 is located at 450 ft amsl approximately 70 in north of Site 10013 (see Figure 12). The site is described in the CSH AIS table as a platform. The area where Site 10020 was plotted on the project map is an area of bulldozed pasture with natural bedrock outcrops and loose rocks. A roughly rectangular pile of natural bedrock boulders was identified at the location of Site 10020. The boulders are naturally occurring bedrock small bOUlders and cobbles. There is a portion along the west side of the pile that appears to contain bulldozer push from a nearby wail. breach. The top of the ruck pile is uneven but somewhat level. 'there is no stacking or facing apparent on the rock pile. 70 The rack pile is natural. but its roughly rectangular shape and somewhat level tela surface make it appear to be a possible archaeological feature. It is likely ffial CSH added the feature to their pedestrian survey summary table for these reasons. CSI I did not include a site description or map of the feature in the AIS report, likely because it was determined to be natural, No further work is recommended at Site 10020. SIHP 10031 Enclosure Remnant FUNCTION: Agricultut°e AGE: Historic Era DIMENSIONS- 12.2 rn long (NE/SW) by 2.0 m wide by 0.8 m in -ax. height CONDITION: Poor INTEGRITY: Altered: retains integrity of location, settinLs, rnatcyrials, and workmanship SURFACE A ffi l"1AC' I.S: None EXCAVATION: No DESCRIPTION: S1HP 10031 is a the remains of an enclosure located between 380 ft. and 390 ft aznsl near the southeast boundary of the project area (see Figure 12), The site was recorded by CSM as a reninant enclosure wall 12.2 rr long (NE/SW"). The wall is L-shaped and is likely the northwest side and worth corner of an enclosure. Based can the enclosure si-r.c and. t:onstruction, and its location. CSM interpreted the site to be associated ww•it.h1 kecliiini,g, catty; out of an agricultural field (Hammatt and Shideler 2007:10). SCS relocated the wall and confmned that the CSH documentation is correct. The L -shape wall segirnent is roughly 12.2 in long; (NE/SW) by 0.6 to 1.0 m wide and is 0.8 m in maximum height. The wall is constructed of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders }piled and stacked on the ground surface (Figure 29), It is cobble and small boulder core filled and roughly bi-faced. The wall has leen bulldozed on both ands and the other three sides of the enclosure have all been removed by bulldozing. All but a small portion of the northwest enclosure wall at Site 10031 has been bulldozed. The site is in poor condition, contains very little integrity and no further ufork is recommended. 71 iAw N „ r"" r • 7 i "J■ipy k fix„ N 'RFs SAW 'r, k IbI Of ♦ _ � 9 e w K '° N4n AS y �l i Jr W � w.. a d r •' rti, 's ° N� u �,� t. .ir " r � �'yatn • , w , ti ,` r• fir' y, � � �r w +y� r r � Hgure29: Photogrdphol'4iLe 11031 RL2ii man11.,1,1 C}tiureWal l. 1.o�ikin SoLitheast. 7? SIRP 10034 Bedrock Outcrop FUNCTION: Natural geological future, not ars archaeological sltc AGE: N/A DIME-NSIONS: 2.5 m long by I.S m wide CONDITION: N/A INTEGRITY: N/A SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Nene EXCAVATION: No DF,SC RTPTION: SIHP 10034 is located at 475 ft amsl approximately 55 m northeast of Site 10020 (see Figure I2). The site is described in the CSH AIS table as a platform. The feature~ was relocated along the north edge of a seasonal gulch during the current AIS fieldwork. The feature is a natural bedrock outcrop roughly 2.5 rn long (E W) by 1.9 m wide by 0.35 m high. The outcrop is a pile of exfoliated bedrock and is natural, but its shapc and somewhat level top surface make it : ppCLu- Lo be a possible archaeoLogical loa[UEr . It is likely that CSH added the feature to their pedestrian survey summary table for these reasons. CSH did not include a site description or leap of the feature in the AIS report, likely because it waw detctmilned to be riaturaL No further work is recommended at Site 10034. SIHP 10067 Terraces FUNCTION, Habitation AGE: Pre Contact era DIMENSIONS: 6.7 to long (L"W) by 5.8 m wide by 0.9 m max. height CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: altered: retains integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS. Basalt Flakes EXCAVATION: CSH 1 X 1 m test unit DE.SCR PTION: SIHP 10067 is three sail retaining terraces located at 440 f ainsl approximately 90 in southeast of Site 10013 (see Figure 12). The terraces are constructed on the south stoping bank Of seasoi:MI gulch. As indicated in the CSH A.IS and confirmed by SCS daring the cutretat study, the three small terraces are constructed of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulde-rs piled and stacked can the ground surface (Figure 30 and Figure 31). 73 kti F Hilt I h I 4 MMI 11�.f ,A, DIHI I I I RA( F 3.I 1 ®lick K BfIW H k F (It 011.1+ • 11 1 1 it ®a Ikikl111 IN ®- IAcINL Q-ti14"11 E1 '" III: P1'111Ncm Rik I.W31 Ir I9u0 1 �..AW 111141 1 LHICX(L., f Vd_C11 r o 4} El I \FOO IATFP IIFIIR{"1I` K [1I. F('ROP Figure 30: Site 10067 {C`SI l Sits. 23?} Plan V1eNN Map (11animatt et al. 1992:49). 74 I WKI"'Iffil Jr W Ik mill r k. NIR The terraces fonn three roughly level soil areas (0.9 m to 3.7 m across) along the south slope of a brick-a-brack p0t (hill). Mualoa School stream runs along the south flank of theptr'n. The southernmost rock ranch wall (Feature 2) at Site 31182 at least sixty (60) feet in length, runs along the north bank of the stream and connects to the terraces. The inuuka (up slope) corner ofthe wall serves as the facing for a small black dirt covered terrace where basaltic glass flakes can be obserued on the dirt surface. CSH EXCAVA HON RESULTS: A one (1) meter square trench (Trench 1) was excavated in the Mack dirt covered terrace where basaltic glass flakes were observed. The telt unit cOUtLIMC€3 [arg.c quantities of basaltic glass flakes (avg. 64 flakes/ 10 cm. level) to bedrock at a maximum depth of 30 cm. Midden material on the other hand was sparse consisting of some shell fragments and very few pieces of fish and mammal bone. A small hearth lens (30 cm. diameter by 20-30 cm. depth) was excavated in the northwest corner of lh.c icst unit. This terrace was clearly used for volcanic glass teal production. Other terraces in the proximity were interpreted as agricultumal. [Haminatt et a[. 1992:48] SIHP 10067 is a pre -Contact era site based on cultural material recovered from the excavation, and is likely associated with lithic too] prodLrctiOct, possible limited use iomporary habitation and agriculture. The site appears to be Tightly altered by grazing cattle and is in good condition. No further work is recommended at Sate 100067. S1 HP 10065 Enclosure FUNCTION, Habitation AGE: Pre -Contact era DI-MENSIONS: 4.3 to long (NE/SW) by 3.7 m wide by 0.3 m max. height CONDITION: Poor INTEGRITY Altered: retains integrity of location and setting SURFACE ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: CSH, 0.5 m X 0,25 m test unit DESCRIPTION: SIHP 10068 was a rectangular enclosure located at 4701t arms] approximately SO mews north of Site 10067 (see Figure 12). Site 10068 was documented in the CSH AIS study as a sinall rectangular enclosure 4,3 on long by 3.7 Ott wide with a maximum. height of 0.3 rn (Figure 32). The infernal dimensions were 2.4 arc by 1.5 m. The enclosure was constructed of angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled and stacked on the ground SUrtace. The walls were core filled and poriions of the enclosure walls were faced, 76 U !) 2 Figure 32: Site 10068 (CSH Site 233) Plan Viesk., flap Showing Test. Trench (l-l;w m):tll et al. 1992:50), 77 The walls of the enclosure were removed by bulldozing after the CSH fieldwork and prior to the SCS resurvey fieldwork. A roughly 2.0 in long portion of collapsed enclosure wall still remained on the ground surface during the current study (Figure 33). CSH EXCAVATION RESULTS: A one meter by 50 cm test trench was excavated in the center of the enclosure. The unit was excavated to bedrock at a depth of 35 cm. Although there was rio distinct cultural deposit, a small amount cif midden material was found itfcludIII g 03 WdC, prptpi, sea urchin and fragments of fishbone. Because of the scarcity cif matcrial and the disturbed nature of the deposits, t1le excavation was discontinued. However, the site probably fi.Lnctioned as a habitation enclosure. [Hammatt et al. 1992:481 Site 10068 has been altered ley bulldozing, is mostly no longer present and is in poor condition. No lurther work is recommended at Site 10068. ST'HP 10069 Modified Bluff FUNCTION: Temporary Habitation Associated with Agriculture AGE: Pre -Contact era DIMENSIONS: 15.0 m long (NIS) by 6.0 m wide by 0.6 to max, lielghL CONDITION: Poor INTEGRITY: Altered: retains integrity oflocatioit and setting SURFACE ARTIFACTS. Nene EXCAVATION: CSH 0.5 m x 0.5 to test unit DESCRIPTION: STHP 10069 is located at 460 ft anisl approximately 30 nt northeast of Site 10067 (see Figure 12). The site is described in tate CSH AIS report as a rack platform construcLed against the south edge of a bedrock bluff north of Holualoa School stream (Figure 34), The bluff top is roughly level with low linear bedrock outcrops. The site appears Lo have been scraped over during previous bulldozing leaving the rock platform and possible walls along the edge of the bluff collapsed, scattered and in a poor state of (reservation. There is also a sail deposit approximately 3.0 m long by 2.1 m wide on the trap of the bluff immediately north of the° platkirm that was tested by excavating a 50 cm. square test unit. 78 Figure 33: Photo ph of Si[c 111066 BLI]khor�d Eii�-.tlnant E.nclosurti kl all. Looking Nooimv,E 79 "Ac �w w , i AR v I 040p- , 1 CSH TEST RESULTS: The 50 cm by 25 cm test unit was excavated as a single stratigraphic soil layer extending to a maximum depth of 22 cm below surface. Midden recovered from the excavation consisted of few shell fraginents and very small number of small animal barge fragments. Volcanic glass was relatively abundant (avg. 10 flakes/each in four 5 cm thick levels). A single basalt flake was the only other artifact recovered. The CSH report interpreted the site to be a temporary habitation feature used for toed production associated with nearby agriculture. [Hari natt et al. 1992:51 ] Site 10069 was relocated y SCS during the current AI.S study. The site has been badly disturbed by bulldozing. The terrace retaining walls consist of dislocated and scattered cobbles and small bouldors (Figure 35). Site 10069 was significantly altered by bulldozing, and i5 in poor condition. No further work is recommended at Site 10069. SIHP 10070 Enclosure Remnant FUNCTION: Agriculture AGE- Historic era DIMENSIONS: 2.6 m long (N/S') by 2.5 m wide by 1.2 m max. height CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY Altered: retains integrity oflocanon, sciting and materials and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: CSH 1.0 ni x 0.5 unit DESCRJPTION- SW 10070 is a U- shaped enclosure located at 540 ti am -sl approximately 15 meters east of Site 10019 (see Figure 12). As indicated in the CSH AIS study and confirmed by SCS during the current study. the enclosure is 2.6 long (N/S) by 2.5 m wide with maximum height of 1.2 m (Figure 36). The eastern side of the enclosure has been impacted by heavy equipment, although the remaining portions of the walls of the structure are well constructed and in good condition (Figure 37). CSH EXCAVATION RESULTS: A 1.0 rn by 4.5 in test unit (Trench 1) was excavated along the interior wall ofthe enclosure.. The unit was excavated to bedrock at a depth of 15 cm. No cultural material was recovered from the excavation. The comparatively new condition of the stonework at the site and its pro x -1i -1ty to other historic features (Site 10419) indicate that the enclosure is most likely of recent age and probably associated with historic agricultural activities such as coffee growing orgrazing. [Hammad et al. 1992:51] 81 Figure 35: Phots?gT-afrhofSite 10069Remains ShLPAIigBul[dozer Dis[urb.9nc:,LookingNoriZw�st. R? . 13R |44) BtLLUOLL LEVEL SOIL . BE11|x)ZEn 071 � (34) MIA Rs KEN T\ o -H. 1. 1 RSH& El 21R[|]|| Figure 36: Site 10070(CSH 235)Plan yip 'Map, \3 Fif! urc 37. PhOD-0111 +I1 '-'Ii!lw I ill--,1b�. r Site 10070 was relocated by SCS during the current AIS study. Based on feature type, dimensions, construction, lack of artifacts recovered during excavatlon, and the features association widi rock 1110LInds at Site 10019, it is likely that the Site 10070 enclosure as, cacIated with I Iistoric era ranching and coffee agriculture. Site IC070 has been altered by bulldozing and is in fair condition. No further work is recommended at Site 14070. S1HP 10072 Complex FUNCTION: Ag,ricullural AGE: Lace Fre-Contact to Ilistoric era DIMENSIONS: 38.8 in long (NIS) by 36.3 to wide by 1.3 max. height CONI MON: Poor TNTECRwIT'Y: Altered: retains integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS. Nene EXCAVATION: CSH TU -I and TU -2. 7.0 m square total DESCRIPTION: SIHF 10072 was a modified bedrock outcrop bluff (Feature 1), a rock mound (Feature 2) and a series of level dirt terraces (Feature 3) Located between 480 ft and 490 ft atnsl along the central northwest boundary of the project area (see Figure I2 and Figur: 38). The site is bounded to the northeast by Size 31182 Feature 9 ranch rock wall (Figure 38). The features were constrttcted on a fairly steep southerly slope. The Feature 3 terraces were bounded by linear rock MOUnds and Feature 1 was called a large bluff. Site 10072 was 38.8 in long (NE/SW) by 36.3 in wide with a maximum feature Height of 1.3 nl.. Fearure I was a modified exfoliated large bedrock outcrop located at the center of Site. 1 tlfl72 (see Figure 38). The top of the outlrrupr was relatively level. The modified portion of Feature 3 was roughly 13.0 in long (NE/SW) by 8.7 in wide by 1.6 in in inaxin7ltm height. The: modified portions of Feat -Lire 3 were constructed by removing angular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders from relatively level areas on, the slope of the feature and piling them above and below the level cleared ground surface (Figure 39 thrnrlgh Figure 41). Feature I was relocated by SCS during the current study. The GSH feature description and plan view map were correct. TUA was excavated by CSH on the level top surface of Feature 3 (see excavation summary below). 85 r • I•Flil'ICI n t''M; Q $ a a �m FF Srl RF a K! il'•1 V Ft %Tt W 1 1410 Ifo I I 11"01" 1 KEY CW _ R.ALSY4t:l' I�fCC'l � � BFIaFCi'AC-k • HL LILI"ZIL la �:� •ICF 11,111 = til OPF' ® - 1> -Sl 1 sit r • I•Flil'ICI n t''M; Q $ a a �m FF Srl RF a K! il'•1 V Ft %Tt W 1 1410 Ifo I I 11"01" 1 F'iq;ure 38: SU 10072 (CSI1 Site 238) Flan View Maji OlammatI ct al. I992:5? h. Feature 2 was a rock, Ocaring mound located 3.3 ni north of F alurc 1. Tl c rack mound measured 3.7 in long (NE/SW) by 3.3 m wide. The rock mound was constructed of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders piled and loosely stacked on exposed bedrock. There was no Facing evident in the feature construction. TU -2 was excavated by CSH through the north half of the rock mound (see excavation summary below). Feature 2 was bulldozed and was no longer present during the current AIS UV% cv. 6 CW Sill ilW F'iq;ure 38: SU 10072 (CSI1 Site 238) Flan View Maji OlammatI ct al. I992:5? h. Feature 2 was a rock, Ocaring mound located 3.3 ni north of F alurc 1. Tl c rack mound measured 3.7 in long (NE/SW) by 3.3 m wide. The rock mound was constructed of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders piled and loosely stacked on exposed bedrock. There was no Facing evident in the feature construction. TU -2 was excavated by CSH through the north half of the rock mound (see excavation summary below). Feature 2 was bulldozed and was no longer present during the current AIS UV% cv. 6 f Y .,'IM F b � *. �. � # 4 �•M"M MY k"'� � sia.. i i Y � fi I�� � � � ��h. r " yy ; " �'4� a KWh. � Y;� � � ��w Y '"�a.z" �• j ���`, �� — "�" Y '' fir. � .�Y ,F � C fel fae -, a,.Y �� -I, �' _ � ,•.�'� +:,-- Y, •" ��.w. '- S�:rT":N�'� + AM iinn 'p. L Y: t IL r Y d µ t 3 fR� Feature 3 was three level soil -filled terraces (Terrace A, 13 and C) located along the east side of'the site (see Figure 39). Feature was 20-0 m tang (NE!SW) by 13.8 in wide. Terrace A was bounded on the north by a linear (NW/SF.) bedrock outcrop and was bounded oil the southeast by a linear (NE/SW) rock inound. There was a roughly oval clearing rock mound (Feature 2) on the south eircl of the linear bedrock outcrop. Feature 3. Terrace B and Terrace C were two sail terraces south of Terrace A and along the cast side of Site 10072 (see Figure 35). The two terraces were bounded on the west by Feature I and by exposed bedrock outcrop to the south. The two terraces were approximately 17.5 m long (N F?'SW) by 14.7 m wide. There was a low linear rack mound that divided the two terraces. The upper (east) tier was approximately 1.0 m above the lower tier. The terraces and IoW liner rock mounds that formed the three terraces were constructed of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders piled and loosely stacked on exposed bedrock. There was no Facini" evident in Feature 3 construction. CSI I EXCAVATION RESULTS, Test Unit 1 (1.5 meters by 2 meters) was excavated on IIIc nilddlc of the tap of Feature I to a depth of 0.5 rttcters. The unit was excavated as a single stratigraphic layer of basalt cobbles and small boulders, and less than 1 em of soil. The unit did riot contain artifacts or cultural deposits and wrininated on bedrock. Based on the structure of the bluff, limited modifications and lack of artifacts, CSH determined chat f=eature I was an exposed bedrock outcrop with small areas of agricultural rock clearing mounds. [Hammatt et al, 1992;51 ] Test Unit 2 (2.0 meters by 2.0 meters) was excavated through the middle of Feature 2. The unit was excavated to the base of the feature and contained an architectural layer of angular and subangular cobbles and small boulders and 40 cin of loose sedimtra. A few small fragments of cowrie and u:ana shell were recovered from the excavation. Therc were no other artifacts or cultural deposits in TU -2. The Feature was most likely an agricultural rock clearing mound. SCS relocated Site 10072 during the current AIS survey. The north and east portions of the site, including Feature 2 and Feature 3 and the Site 31182 Feature 9 ranch rock wall have been bulldozed and are no longer present. Feature I was the only feature remaining. Feature 1 is only slightly altered, is partially collapsed in places and is in fair c onditiOn. 90 Based on the types of features, their construction method and very limited amount of ma ne shell recovered from subsurface testing at Feature 1 and feature 2, Site 10072 is most likely a late pre -Contact to Historic era agricultural site_ The site has been altered by bulldozing, is in poor coaditinn and no further work is recommended at Site 10072. SMP 10073 Complex FI NCTION: Agricultural 'IGL Historic Era D1 IM FNSIONS: 15.0 m tang (N'W!SE) by 14.0 m wide CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY, Altered: retains some integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS: lone E.YCAVATIOM TU -1 and TU -2. DESCRIPTION: SIHP 10073 is two rock clearing mounds ( Feature I and Feature 2) and an enclosure (Feature 3) located at 575 fl amsl in the northeast quadrant of the project arta (see Figure 1.2). CSH recorded two platforms, one (Feature l) measuring eight feet high on the downhill (makai) side. CSN interpreted the features as historic cattle loading ramps (Hammatt et a1. 1992 23). SCS rclocated. Site 10073 and recorded two rack clearing motuids, Feature I and Feature 2, and an enclosure, Feature 3 (Figure 42). The site is approximately 15.0 m long; (NW/SE) by 14.0 m wide. Feature 1 is a platform shaped rock clearing mound constructed on a south slope along the southwest corner of the site (see Figure 42). The rock mound is 5.5 xu long (NE/SW) by 5.4 m wide, with a maximum height of 1.40 m. It is constructed ofanguiar and subangular large basalt cobbles and small Boulders stacked and piled three to six course~ on the ground surface (Figure 43). The top surface is partially paved with small cobbles. The walls are faced. Feature 1 appears to be unaltered and is in good eondition. Feature 2 is a linear rock mound located upslope to the northeast of Feature 1 (see Figure 42). The pl atfarm is approximately 6.5 m long; (SE;'NW) by 3.0 m wide, with a maximum height 0,81 m. Feature 2 is constructed of large basalt cobbles and sinall boulders piled and stacked two courses high On the grOUrnd surface (Figure 44). The southwest side of tho plad'Onn is roughly faced. Feature 2 appears to be unaltered and is in good c:c ndltiou. 91 �I°I,►�II�I�k . m I I.AI`L1RE I v I Figure 42: Site 10073 Flan View Map. 92 i : 'i' I I R 1' 30 03 ■ I KEV - BEDROCK K AI•%LGFk I'#� - FiE. GHT A HCiW SURFACE IN cm figure 43: NhULOI�ra[lh 4A'SlLe 1003 Feature 1 Platform Looking South_ 91 s •; � t � r r r- }� .4 • inrl l _. •' ­ - ] a N 1,t Zt figure 43: NhULOI�ra[lh 4A'SlLe 1003 Feature 1 Platform Looking South_ 91 Figure 44: PlwUIL!1111t1 Ll I "a(V IIFIi;`.t ]--QW IN 2 I'latlorm L_tI4lkii1,! 1-,1. 94 Feature 3 is an enclosure located southea ,,L ofFeature 1 and Feature 2 (see Figure 42). The enclosure is approximately 11.0 m Long (NL --.SW) by 5,d in wide, with a maxittnurn height. of 97.0 m. The enclosure walls are constructed of aur 7ular and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders piled and stacked one to three courses (0.9 m maximum height) on the ground sctrface (Figure 45). The interior of theenclosure is primarily pahoehoe bedrock outcrop with sediment built up along the interior of the enclosure walls. Feature 3 appears to be unaltered and is in good condition. SCS FACAVATION RESULTS: SE'S excavated a test excavation unit (TU -1) it FGaatilt"C 1 and a test unit (TU -2) within Feature 3. The lest units were excavated to document feature construction and to determine feature function and age through diagnostic artifacts. TIJ-I was a 2.3 m long ( Nom: S1✓) by l .2 In wide test unit (TU -1) excavated in the southeast quadrant of the Feature 1 rock Clearing nataund (see Figure 42). TU -t was excavated as aro architectural layer and otic natural stratigraphic layer. and terminated can bedrock at 97 cin below the top surface of thy: te,11tUre (Figure 46 through Figure 48). The natural stratigraphic layer (Layer 1) was not screened in arbitrary 10 €Ira lcvels. The Architectural Layer 09 cmc analxUmmi thickness) consisted of angular and subaaig,u.lar cobbles and small boulders witli a small anwLint of decomposing organic detritus. There were no artifacts, cultural deposits oa subsurfac:c features in the architectural layer. The toga surface of the architectural layer was fairly lcv wl cobbles and small boulders, The architectural layer continued into Layer 1 and terminated on bedrock approximately 75 cm to 100 cm below the top surface of the feature.. Layer 1 (0-65 cinbs) was very dark grayish brawn (10YR312) loose sandy silt ]uanl 95""r, cobbles and small boulders. The rock excavated in Layer I was architectural rack. The architectural layer terntinaated on bedrock thrOlIghaut the entire unit. There were no artiffi is In Layer 1, Based on feature shape, dimensions, construction, and the absi mce of artifacts recovered from TU -1, it is likely that Feature 1 is a rock clearing mound. The shape and construction methal its similar to Historic eras sugarcane rock clearing mounds clOcurnented in ether pasts of Tlawai`i Island. 95 Figure 45. P[wtopmji'i ol'SiLe I(X)7i Feat Lire 3 EMAOS LTC ShOlVirtiU. [merior [xwel Bedrock 0ii terop, Looking, ",..:+ .-.I VILA SL it kN w �-t-N)1141!6LK)PARK OP%"ll III iwl I BEDROCK Figur-46: Site 10073. Feature 1. TIT -1 Southwest Profile. 97 L t - Y �-a �+ r y � f• .• _ F h R q.,,` e��. ate' +•* "'"ya"w,Y ."i. r! �,.� i � f t � � \. \� ` »� k� Vigiin, 48- llhimirT.njAoflu[L- 1-,!lLltiry 1.T INorihevsa ind Nonkwm Prufil� _[ i 2 eras a 1.0 by 1.0 m test unit excavated within the southern portiun of the Feature 3 encloser,- Figure 42). TU -2 was excavated as four statural stratigraphic layers, and terrnin,cilcd on bedrock at 58 embs (Figure 49 through Figure 52). The natural straiigraphic Iaycr�, v, -en ,.-xc. -.Ltcd in arbitrary 10 cm levels. Layer I (0-10 cmbs) was very dark brown (7.5YR2.5i2) loose sandy loam with M pebbles and cobbles. Layer I terminated on Layer TI sediment below. The boundary between Layer I and Layer It was fairly level and diffuse. There were no ariii:acts in Layer I. Layer [1(10-25 cmbs) was very dark brown (7.5YR2.5/2) soft sandy barn with 5.0 cm of black (7.5YR2.511) sandy silt loam mottling at its base. Layer II contained 5% gravels. Layer I[ was excavated as a 10.0 cm Level. I and an 8.0 cm level 2. Layer Il, Level 2 contained a small amount of charcoal flecking and a cowrie shell fragment. The base of the enclosure wall architecture was 20-28 cmbs in Layer I1, Level 2. Layer II terminated on Layer III sediment below. The boundary betwcen Layer lI and Layer IIT was fairly level and clear. Layer 111(28-40 clubs) was black (7.5Y122.511) soft sandy silt loath with 15% pebbles and cobbles. Layer III did not contain artifacts. Layer IV Oo-59 cmbs) was dark yellowish brown (IOYR314) soft sandy silt with 51/1a bedrock cc bbics. Laycr IV was excavated as two lcv,4N, was terminated on bedrock and did not contain artifacts, The C SH ATS report interpreted Site 10073 to be a Historic era agricultural site. The dimensions. shape, and construction of Feature I and Feature 2 are similar to Historic era sugarcane ruck clearing mounds documented in other locations on Hawaii Island. The absence of artifacts in test excavation units also suggests Feature 1 and Feature 3 are associated with agricultural use. Site 10073 appears to be unaltered and is in good condition_ No further work is rccorntnended at. Site 10073. 100 Figure 49: Site 10073, FicaLure 3. Tl. -2 Northeast and Southeast Profiles. 101 Ikx111:.4541 MA1.J. Tsoc III I.4"I til tl I If �..._ 1A ti F• HIP 1 tiF,.q 53 tl111 — L•�I Lll1 41 111 Lal mi 1011 lit Ilii IMI ilw :IiR rol nIti I'tiS IN 1,5V WYD4. Fl. ah It R(AX%,'iS R '1 21 6AMF)" 113,01 m• t tl I k 11: 5 I R) 11 Xkh 1IR4I%4 w L' {h N ! {•2p1+thlw5 L IIkM t`LF(ILL.-\lh 175VR:. 611+L•411 L4!%%I ®- LOVA Ila: RI.4( k 1'7 cy R LmL l I %.%NDV 1!7411 1.461 I It. J 1': I IARIIL 1 I;i..1.:111" MR RUM 'N r I R1 R 1 41 " %.NDI S(1.1 Rot. t1 I R4 K K4 ®. 1 :s 1 t1,1 141' Wki l WKNS 141'i'pE��.li h Figure 49: Site 10073, FicaLure 3. Tl. -2 Northeast and Southeast Profiles. 101 F'igurio 5IY, Phutog ph o1 pile [007. Fe,-jlL,rw. :'l: ' ?1I1I IJIQ ll t Prolile ShOWjDg BsjW ol'l4l-ChlLeCTIPTe. 102 FigUM, 51! Ph*togrlph ol'Site I I HI I -.. ',,I ca I ji-c T( ""'ohlic.l.'A Pro 1111:. 103 Figure 52: PhOLOM-alih uFSite 10073. Fesaturc 3. TU -Bas nl'Excavatinn L000ir 5outhoa t. 104 SIHP 10074 Enclosure Remnant FUNCTION: Coffee Work Shed AGE: Historic: Era DIMENSIONS: 16.5 nY long (NE -/SW) by 15.0 rn wide CONDITION: Poor INTEGRITY Altered: retains minimal integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Coral abrader and corrugated metal roofing EXCAVATION: CSM TLl-1 and TU -2,1,25 ni square total. DI"SCRIPTION: S I H P 10074 was a rectangular enclosure, a low rack wall and collapsed pig pen located at 640 ft ainsl roughly 50 meters east of Site 10073 (see Figure 12). The site is on roughly level ground above a seasonal gulch to the southeast. There are several old growth ironwood trees at the site.. The CSH ARS report site plan and description showed an 8.5 m long (NE/SW) by 8.1 in }vide by 1? in high cncIosure aIorig the northeast side of Sate 10074 (Figure 53). The enetri sure was constructed of aiia�11�1r and subangular basalt cobbles and small boulders stacked on the ground surface. 'l lic k �d 1, were Iii -faced and pebble and cobble core -filled. The exteriors of the wall; were noally The interior of the enclosure was level rocky soil with a remnant low ruck wall 3.7 m long (7,1� ` F) chat divided the center of the enclosure. There was a cobble paving between the wcsi endol ure wall and the central dividing wall. The enclosure was likely used as a house foundation .jnd the flared area might have funclio ed as a lanai outside ofthe hoose structure. A coral abrader was located on the surface of the cobble paving. There is a Low rock wall along the, southeast and southwest sides of the hoose enclosure. There was also a C -shape enclosure at the northwest end of the terrace. The rock wall was 1.9.7 rn long total by 0.6 m wide and was constructed of a one to two courses (wide) of large cobbles and small boulders piled and stacked two to three courses high on the ground surface. There was a small rock mound on the southeast end of the wall. The collapsed C -shape enclosure (pig pert) was 4.0 m long (NE/SW) by 3.5 teeters wide and opened to the north. The C -shape was constnicted of angular and subangnlar cobbles piled and stacked on the. grourid surface. No heights were given for tate terrace or C -shape. SCS relocated the site during the Current AIS fieldwork. All but a portion of the rock. wall (SE and SW segments) has been bulldozed (see Figure 53 and Figure 54). The rock wall matched the, CS11 AIS description and was also partially collapsed. 105 PLAN BULLDOZED BULMOZED t� 0 2 $ 1Ci -SrEG''rM A giiNarized rcHYir)g rr.' i,tia,k•� tree - Figure 53: Site 10074 Plan View Map (Adapted from Hammatt et aL 1992:9). 106 r., bbIC ti^ — 1� lil l.l.lt[ )i.I'.11 110 will t 9 l art. rded t' t� 0 2 $ 1Ci -SrEG''rM A giiNarized rcHYir)g rr.' i,tia,k•� tree - Figure 53: Site 10074 Plan View Map (Adapted from Hammatt et aL 1992:9). 106 .�. Y� 1 - '�A /'44. 4 , *i �1.-,��.,1 � �.� °� '�M1�gy..T �l � �� - a1•- T ! � �� � ��yqq. � �•'r, � � d �' 1r 1i', 1 ' Y V r� � ""i+ n'Y C, w � i `Tt -19N ,M d Jell 1p M � , w � h CSH EXCAVATION RESULTS: A 50 can square test unit (TU -1) was excavated in the Soil deposit in the center of the rectangular enclosure. The unit was excavated to sterile Pahala ash at a depth of 35 cm below, the nnodern grmUnd surface. The trench yielded a few fragments of cowrie shell and one volcanic glass flake. CSH suggested that the recovered artifacts were not consistent with what appeared to be the historic age of the foundation. CSH suggested that the artifacts might represent the scattered remains of prehistoric occupation. A second test unit (TU -2) was excavated by CSH through the southwest w'alI cal'tlte rectangular enclosure. Artifacts recovered from the wall's architectural layer % er4 tragal-ients rel' bottle glass, glazed ceramic sherds, wire nails and fragments of redw,'ood. Sitc 10074 was interpreted as most likely a small dwelling or work shed associated with coffee farming. Coffee trees were identified along the seasonal gulch tothe south. [Hamrnari et a]. 1992:541 The: ;ite was bulldozed at some point after the CSH AIS study. When SCS relocated the, site, it was almost completely bulldozed and is in poor condition. All that rerna.ins is the partially collapsed portion of what appears to be the southeast corner of the enclosure vvall. Site 10074 has been altered by bulldozing, is in poor condition and no f tmher work is recommended at the site. S1 HP 10075 Enclosure Remnant FUNCTION: Pig Pett A GF-, Historic Era DIMENSIONS, 9.0 m hang (NW;SL--) by 4.6 in wide by 1.8 m max. height CON D f TION; Poor INTEGRITY GRIT'Y Altered: retains minimal integrity of location, setting, materials. and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Notic EXCAVATION: None DESCRIPTION: S1HP 10075 is a large rectangular enclosure remnant located at 630 ft amyl in the north corner of the project area (see Figure 12), The CSH AIS report describes the enclosure as measuring roughly 9.0 m king (NW/SE) by 4.6 m wide with wall height ranging from , long aids oriented north -south, with walls 1.5 rn to 1.8 m in height. The northwest ,vall had ra low (one facet higgh) stone slab "lintel" opening a few feet from the northeast corner of the structure 0lammatt et al, 1992:23'). 108 When SCS relocated Site 10075 during the current AIS study, the noilheast and northwest walls had been bulldozed and were no longer present. Only portions of the southeast and sotithwest walls remainod intact. The remaining wal Is have been impacted by bulldozing and were partially collapsed. The Site 10075 enclosure remnant is currently 4.75 m long ( N- W1SE) by 4.6 m wide and has maximurn wall heights of 0.58 m (Figure 55). The enclosure walls range from 0.5 to 0.65 m in width. The walls are constructed of angular, subangular .and slabby basalt large cobbles and large boulders stacked three to tour courses high on the ground surfacc (Figure 56 and Figure 57). The walls were likely faced in places but are now collapsed. The interior of the enclosure is roughly level rocky soil. CASH interpreted the enclosure as a Historic era pig pen based on its size, feature construction, wall heights, and their similarities to ether Histuric era pig pens documented across Hawaii Island. Site 10075 has been altered by bulldozing, in. poor condition and no fia-ther work is recommended at the site SIHP 30592 Railroad Berm FUNCTION, : Transportation AGE: historic Era DIMENSIONS: 300.0 tni long (NQS) by 4.0 m wide max. by 5.0 ni max. lteight CONIC I T ION; Good INTEGRITY: Unaltered, retains integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SUR -FACE ARTIFACTS: railroad Spike EXCAVATION, Nene DESCRIPTION: Site 30592 is a segment of the railroad berm located between 680 m and 690 tri amsl along the project area east boundary (see Figure 12). The railroad berm continues south off the current project area. The railroad berm is approximately 300.0 tri in length (N/S) and between 2.5 rn and 4.0 in wide by 5.0 m in maximuni height. The railroad bed is a level dim and rack surface (Figure. 58), and the berm is located along the west side. orthe railroad bed. The bene is a west sloping retaining wall coltstructed of small boulders and large cobbles stacked up to nide courses high (Figure 59 and Figure: 60). The berril is well faced with fairly tightly fitted natural rack. The rock has not been worked prior to stacking. Tlie Merril face slopes slightly toward the east as it approaches the top to prevent collapse. 109 FP ._ 00 0 C) Q 0 Q JAI I.I.IliVI'.II m DOLLD 0 C j57 0 LSD 000 0 6(B 0 0 0 V O0 0 ®r) 0 yc - ;60 � 0 O o � C] KIN TREE ( } - NEF�GHTABOVE(;K( [ •, F,i Figure 55: Site 10075 flan View Map. 110 r • � • ', �� f r 11i►"" lir '"1 - ,. . TWIT, � , Ile 11 •ry u Y .��`. �... , m T �'h� y •, a ., P f, . r r v s s t :n .. �1 � ..s^ 'TIS. I"✓ _. ec 1"I 40 IR 10 y \ y M M +� P V f� .� fk�.J 7 e ,x � � V �c �� • �Wr I in J� f��'.M� ' Figiire 58: Pholu�g-raph of Site 30592 Railroad 13crin R, :1 Boo, Larking South. T. l 3 a 1, _ i i tk� f A'* 'R� � � �t 'Ihtl .� i� ` .. W CRS, '� •s; f' RL'fd(• h. k• ` ae• � � C� Figure6O: Site 30592 Rai [road Benn Retaining Nk,, all Profilo. 115 The retaining wall is approximately 5.0 m high and is constructed of fifteen courses of large basalt cobbles and small boulders. The north enol of the berm has been bulldozed roughly 60.0 in South of the nonhea.st corner of the project area. Site 30592 appears to be Unaltered and is in good condition. Only the north enol of the railroad berm has been altered by bulldozing. Site 30592 is in good condition and is recommended for preservation. SIHP 31181 Enclosure Remnant FUNCTION, Habitation A,GF: Pre Contact Era DIMENSIONS: 3.40 m long (NW/SE) by 1.24 m wide by 1.10 m max. height CONI EMON: Poor INTI" FRITY: Altered: retains minimal integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SURFACE ARTIFACTS: Coral Abrader EXCAVATION: None DESCRIPTION Site 31181 is an enclosure remnant located at 645 ft atrnsl in the northeast corner of the project area (see Figure 12). The feature is constructed on a fairly level pahoehoe bedrock outcrop. The feature has been altered by bulldozing and only a portion of the southwestern wall rcivains intact. The renis rit wall ati ti�- cll as the bcdrock outcrop tett which it rests, are situated in an arta that has been lieii� fly dozed (Figure ure 61). The enclosure remnant is approximately 3.40 m long (N /SE) by 1.24 m wide by 1.10 m in maximum height. The enclosure is constructed of angular basalt small boulders stacked three to four courses high on the bedrock outcrop (Figure 62). The walls are very roughly faced. The bedrock outcrop which functions as the interior floor of the StrUCture appears to extend beyond the limits of what was once the original structure. A coral abrader inapnent was located in the south corner of the enclosure (Figure 63). Based on the size and construction of the enclosure, it is passible that it was used for pre - Contact era temporary habitation. It will nett be passible to test excavate the feature as it is constructed on bedrock. Site 31181 has been altered by bulldozing, is in poor condition and no i"uriher work is recammended at the site, 116 Figure 61: Site 31191 Plan View Map. 117 SIRP 31182 label Walls FUNCTION: Ranching and Agriculture AGE: Historic Fara. DIMENSIONS: 900N 0 rn long (NE/SW) by 550.0 nt wide by 1.20 m max. heighi CONDITION: .Fair INTEGRITY: Altered: retairl!� i Hurnal integrity of location. tietticl��. materials, and workmanship SL; RI~ACE ARTIFACTS: I Iistoric to Modern era bottles and cans EXCAVATION: None DESCRIPTION: Site 31182 is the ranch rack walls (Features I through 14) that divide the entire project area into paddocks and agricultural fields (Figure 64). They are located between 3(-@ and 700 ft ranisl. The nia-iority of rack walls (n=10) are oriented lrhrrfka-rnakui (NE/SW-) while a smaller number (11-6) Of` x110 ter northl'sGuth walls create divided spaces within the longer mauka-infiikaj walls. There is a small pen in the sowliww est corner of the project area at the suuthwosi end of'wall. Feature 4 (Figure 65). The small pets at the southwest end of Feature 4 is either for calves or is a pig pen. The small pen has metal pipe gates to allow access and appears more modern than most of the walls. There are also three lager corals, or paddocks (Feature 12. 14, and between those features and wall Feature 5) in the southwest corner of the project area (sec Figure 64). Wall Features l and 5 are property boundary walls and der not follow LCA or LG boundaries. The northern cnd of Feature 2 wall and Feature 3 wail appear to bw constructed along the boundaries of LCA #3630 to John G. Munn (see Figure 7). The rock walls are of a very similar constriction. They are constructed of angular, subangular and slabby basalt large cobbles and small boulders stacked tour to six courses high on the ground surface (Figures 66 through 72). The walls range from four to six courses wide. The outer rocks are placed so that their flattest edges are facing the outside of the wall- The walls are not nobble care tilled but are bi-faced. The outsides of the walls slope slightly inward from the base to the top of the walls for stability. There are openings in some of the w aIIs. and some with and rnetaI pipe or wood gates it) aIIclw access through the walls, BarbQd wire fence has been installed along one side of some of the walls. 120 1, -1.. i 71 r I -'ItitK lR4Y{Iwh kli4 �. I IP�I1Ita„ 1 Fgurc 64: 7.5 -Minute Series, USGS Topographic Map Slwvwing Lucatiun of Site 31 192 Ranch Wall Features and Project Area (SSRI. 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kcalakektla Quadrangle). 1.21 •.. b -Aki 14 11114 1h.14 wllk. `` S$ 4..: • NNIM1a1 Y1. til NY _ I,' RAI4 tti4 tlp ■ ' IGl701 -+ILihtiLfr.tiu*~inlx 1 ti -� 11 cU IIMI Ift Zia �I. ' e4lYin J S A"M1Y, i♦ Y �1 g"L��' i � y�� �� 1} +�5. ♦ v I IP�I1Ita„ 1 Fgurc 64: 7.5 -Minute Series, USGS Topographic Map Slwvwing Lucatiun of Site 31 192 Ranch Wall Features and Project Area (SSRI. 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kcalakektla Quadrangle). 1.21 o ,F jf dOop- No h y� Figure 66: Photograph of Site 31.182 Fwxruree 4 South End Showing Wall Con5truction, LLwking N4rlh. 1.23 Figurt 67: llhotogaph oi'Site 311821 Featurc 4 South End Showing Wall Construction, Looking North. 1.24 M * w1*7z T "�e� P k. m 9 � T I`Igure 6S: Photograph of Site 31182 Feature 4 Showing Top of Wall Construction, Looking Northeast. 125 r a - i , W.. Wti w f , �� r• 6 Hg,111e "I : I'll LILL I ,l ,I u1 Site 311 1, iowre 1.1 Shot+kua Vvail Construction. Looking East, 1.29 Many cif the walls have been altered and are either cc)l lapsed in places or have had their ends bulldozed or have bulldozer breaches through them, providing nems access. The remaining Site 31182 walls have not been altered, are in good condition and no further work is recornmended for them IF -1 Isolated Petroglyph FUNCTION: Marker AGE- Pre Contact Era D11MENSIONS: 0.90 m by 0 70 m CONDITION: Fair INTEGRITY: Altered SURFACE. ARTIFACTS: None EXCAVATION: bone DESCRIPTIC)M Isolated Find -1 (IF -1) is a pet ropglyph located a( 4l0 It ainsl alonig the southwest boundary of the pr€ icct area (see Figure 11). The single petroglyph is ala hnagc of a person etched onto a small basah boulder (Figure 73) in a bulldozed disturbed area north ofa seasonal i ulch. The boulder is 0.90 rn in length, 0,70 In wide and is not: associated with any features (Figure 74). The petroglyph likely depicts a hrunan farm, although an interpretation of its significance is difficult as the image has deteriorated. SCS contacted Shane Nclson, the Office o l lawaiian Affairs We!c t I lawai`i Representative to woii,., ult oil the can the final disIN) 'II1011 a I I d prescrVaIioji treaIinew, for the petroglyph. IF- 1 appears to be unaltered, is in fair condition and preservation at a nearby protected location on the property Is reconurlended. 130 Figure 74: Site 31181 Ilorow lYph ["Ian View Drawing. 132 CONCLUSION Seventeen archaeological sites were identified and recorded in the project area (Table 7 and Figure 75). Fifteen of the sites were previously documented and two sites were previously undocumented (Site 3 C 181, a small coffee shed enclosure and Site 31182, ranch walls). The location of one of the 17 sites (Site 10012). was relocated, though the burials were reinterred off project and the archaeological features at Site 10012 are no longer present on the ground surface. An isolated petroglyph (IF-[) was also recorded during the current AIS study. Six of the sites and IF -1 were determined to be pre -Contact era sites, three associated with habitation, one with agriculture, one single feature site (Site 10012) formerly associated with burials, and a single petroglyph. The burials at Site 10012 were removed and reinterred off -project prier to 1983. Eleven of the sites were determined to be Historic era sites, the majority associated with cutTee agriculture and cattle ranching. Four of the Historic era sites likely had a habitation componciit. Table 7: Inventory of .Archaeological Sites in the Currcnt AIS Protect Area. wllllt# 11 INPE FUNCTION AGC ]ilUl l 1'IsLf01111 AIL C ]CLUL111" IL:nlP_ ILbILILVIII Prr-[ 0111ALL 10012 • Yiailarul & 14 lt[ t3 un al l'rr-CU I I L ALL Itis}I * Fr1&Kiiref La Tl it ,v Ili11si1;Irion PPL-(1,111;1C.L ltif)Iti 1 ncl4nulti �iJii'I111111.1I Ilistoric I LJ F lice}; Mounds A". I II,Lor]ti 100A I I .1ido4kirc Wall A!_N'W LIfI I L I'E I IISL+1:-1, 10067 1 CTIUM-5 111 INULI LOI1 Pl C -C U 11L UL 100ftX Enclosure 11L hir;Irio l PI V -C ontalct 1006L) Mckliticd Wuff P€atfoun I i;Ihi..I L LO 11 Historic 10070 L: -Shape f nt'Iosurc. Ag icallurc Historic 10072 Complex _gip, Clearing l'rc ]'UISliL4'L 10073 Complex Ranching & Ag. I Ilstoric 10074 F1}CIosurc 1'401'1 5llyd Hlsmric 1007 5, I_nclw Llri Pi" Pell I S1061: 301492 RaIIroad Uer111 I'r£111+-ports ion I IlttonaC ;1 11i I Encloslure C'nllc4 �k't,rk Slut I lisu7ric 3 11 K2 Rock Walls Ranrhiml & A,, Historic 1F-1 Paraglyph Mal`Lr Pre-COnLUL:L Site numbers are preceded by the prefix 50 -10 -37 - Orange Shading - Site no longt�r present. • Burial Site 10012 reinterred off project prior to 1983, 133 0 144RA \ 0 14,4wy —, I ml:: 1l "&-rL4Pq I Figure 75. -.4; Nfi I LAIC Scrio, USGSTopogmphic Map Showing Location iul'Anhuetlhlgl-Lul Siivs and Pruerl A rQ�L i FSR L 2011, Sotjr,O: N;!4j[j1117;Lj Gcographic Society. USGS. Kcalakvkua Quadrangle). 134 rm A mot %Dkml .+}s4 W. lAt 1 0 i4jl% Ci 1414 %TF15 Fn;l I a uk kttJt HL ftl -.L 0 N+, A 14 %%1111%{. mu 0 dL%.m0AIjlP% %PI 1 3 t 00 L WN IIIlllrIT%t%lDlR T,,.' R 01 0 41 %J.L 1 J 11 a41 IlHk 'INO KkK 111-4-01 -111 L IN 1:1011 0 $I ILI %I 0 144RA \ 0 14,4wy —, I ml:: 1l "&-rL4Pq I Figure 75. -.4; Nfi I LAIC Scrio, USGSTopogmphic Map Showing Location iul'Anhuetlhlgl-Lul Siivs and Pruerl A rQ�L i FSR L 2011, Sotjr,O: N;!4j[j1117;Lj Gcographic Society. USGS. Kcalakvkua Quadrangle). 134 There is a concentration of Historic era agricultural and livestock situ (Site 10019 10018, L0070, 18073, 100741 10075, and 31181) located in the: noilheast quadrant of the project area. The features include rock clearing mounds and enclosures. The sites are clustered along; a seasonal gulch. Sites include rock clearing mounds and small enclosures associated with coffee and sugarcane growing. There area smaller number of pre -Contact era agricultural sites (Site 10011 and 10072) and temporary habitation sites associated with atixneiiIture (Site 10013, 10067, 10068, and 10069) near the south central portion of the project arca. Three ofthe habitation sites are north of the Holualoa School stream located along the south boundary of the project area. Artifacts recovered from test excavations at these rites included a number of volcanic -g=lass flakes, indicating tool manufacture. The many I Ik[oric cra rock angle (Site 31 11Q) are associated with cattle ranching. There are ma:rka-raaakai walls divide the entire len-th of the project area into separate paddocks. There are north -south walls that further divide the paddocks into smaller pastures. There are also a series of large corrals in the southwest corner of the project and a small pen in the southeast corner ofthe profect area. Ranchers often move cattle horn paddock to paddock to prevent overgrazing. They also pasture yearling;,, separate from alder cattle. Corrals and sinaller pens are use for branding, inoculation and to gather cattle for transport to Market. Thcre is a dirt ranch road leading to corral Feature 12 that crosses the Mlualoa School strep ni, 61'vwm the extensive [anti Historic era and modern land alteration in the project area. it is difficult to synthesize a clear picture of pre -Contact era site distribution and land use for the project area lands. It is clear that there were pre -Contact agricultural sites and associated temporary habitation sites in the lower and mid -elevation poi lions of the project arm especially along the strearn (seasonal gulch) to the south. The few remai11ing sites do not provide a good sample to compare with site distribution patterns recorded at less disturbed projects of similar location in Dona. The project area does provide a fairly complete picture of Historic era cattle ranching and agricultural land use, including information on cattle pasturing;, management, care, and transport. 135 SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS iie identified during this project were assessed for their significance as outlined in. Hawaii Administrative Mules §13-294-& To be assessed as significant s site shall possess integrity of location, design, wtting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association and shall meet one or more of the following five criteria: (a) It must be associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history, or he considered a traditional cultural property, (b) It must be associated with the lives of persons significant in the past_ (c) It must embody distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lank individual distinctiota. (d) It must have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. (e) Have important value to native Hawaiian people or other ethnicities in the state, due to associations with Cultural practices and traditional beliefs that were, or still are, carried out. All of the archaeological sates documented in this report }veru evaluated for their sign1licance (Table 8). All of the sites identified during the current AIS study possess inlet-3'ity i>f location and materials and u crc asse-ssed significant under criterion "d" as they have yicldcd or are likely to yield information I111portant to prehistory ancVor hislory. All of the sates, with Clic exception of the railroad berm Site 30592 and the burial Site 30593 provide inforiiiation important to pre - Contact era and Historic era agricultural pursuits and catty ranching. They provide data on pre - Contact era through most -Contact era and the Historic era features constructed for growing subsistence and commercial crops and raising beef for commercial narkets. They :also provide data important to changing land -use as some farmers bgzn to use land for cattle pasture in response to developing local and external market on Hawaii Island and 0 ahu. The ranch walls.. paddocks and corral sites provide information on the ways land was altered and divided to accommodate bath farming and ranching. 136 Table S: Inventory of Arcbatolegical Sites in the C'wxent AIS Project ,"Lleit. 5lHl'llt' TYPE Fl WTION 4GF SFr:.NIFICANCE CR1TEMA RECONIMENDAI ION I(AI L Philfn&rn 1a. k'It:ninc 111,2-C Ulluer. d No Further WiirL 10012 • Fladuall&. Fall Bohol PT4hi'Lo1. Nu luggki leniticant � NO FlITthir Wjrk I(ml I i Eric It rtm & L-&%, r Tube I1al'aulcon llrr-C LI onrt d ",'i5 Furtl rr W� irk 100111 Etwlo.wre ALnCLL[LUr&tl Historic d No 1 aIllier Wurk I(MI19 ti Rock Nloumi,, A9, Clewing HisloHC d No Further W,,rk 10031 EnclaNure WaLl Agriculture 1h."lodc d NO Funh n %1,m k 10007 Tormo'* Hilbilatittn Prehistoric d NO: uth.r 11' ,rk 1(1W Em2lusure Habrlulion Irrrhi',toric d No Further kl,irk IllliH MaditicdB1u1"lailiu-lll Ih1sitatrolt Historic d No Further W1,ik I(4170 U -Shupe FnA)mmTc Agrieulturr ilislnric d No Further W,,rk 101172 Iti'lndihed Htuff Ag, Clettring, Pm-Cisrllmtrt d No Further 'i"ri k I(K173 Caroplea Rawhiag* Ag, Hlstaric d No Furth, r Woi k I(Al 74 Eru_luwre surfer WoA Sheri Historic Nu Further kl,irk I01173 Ealosurc Pit] Pet& Historic' d No FuiOwi W1 - i k 30592 Railroad Herm Tmispartmfida llisloi+c ra e, d Pm-4crlation In-l'h,,- 3119.1 E do.,wrc Co13ec.Warle Sbod 1- i&Wnz d Ng Funlier 4l'i rl k 311#12 Rock Walls RRnching & Ag, I tibtodQ d Not Further Work 1F-1 Pevoglyph MsrkCr Prrbi9tOrir d,r Pr&;t-mutihn "Site iwm1ae.rs aro pweetiJedtry the prefix 511-111-37, Lin+ngc Marling - Sitr no longcT prc cm- • 0uriul Site 10012 reinturrcd ofl'prnjaat prior to L983_ 137 The pre -Contact era agricultural :and hahilation sites (10011, 10013, 10 67, 10€168, and 10072) and the petroglyph (IF -1) were assessed significant under critenon "d" as they have yielded or are likely to yield information important to pre-C-011MC] er,l :izriCLIlture and temporary habitation and tool production associated with aaicultural }pursuits in the region. The railroad berm Site 30592 is also significant Lander criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a significant contnbialon to the hroad patterns of our history and it embodies distinctive characteristics of thiY Type, period, and method of railroad bed construction. SC'S considled with the Office of l•lawai 133 AlTairs (01 IA) Kona representative Shanc Nehson to ask for any input regarding Site 30592, RECOMMENDATIONS The railroad berm Site, 30592 is recommended for preservation with preservation measures to be outlined in an archaeological preservation plan. The petroglyph (IF -1) is recommended for preservation in a safe location on the project area, preferably within the Site 30592 railroad berRi preservation area.. No further work is recommended for the remaining 16 archaeological sites. Information rccorded for all 16 archaeological sites during the currelIt study leas adequately ascertained their fUlICtion and age. 138 Aki, H. REFERENCES CITED 1952 Flap ofKailua Section, North Kana:,, Hawai`i, Land Titles, Survey and Map by J. S. Emerson. Havwai'i Territory Survey Map, Registered I4+1,ap No. 1280. Alexander, J, 1555 Map ofHnlualoa 1 & 2, Kona Hawaii. Hawaii Territory Survey Map. Registcred Map No. 1450. Athens, J., T. Reith, and T. Dye 2014 A paleoenvironmental and archaeological model -based age estimate for the colonization of Hawaii. American AntiyrrrlU, 79(4);144-55. Bergin, Dr. B. 2004 Lo"val to the Land -The Legendar-t' Parker ranch, 750-1 0. Lrniversity ofHawti`i Press. Honolulu. Barrera, W. Jr. 1971 (a Keauhou, North Moira, hHowadd. Bishop 1 frr.�a rrrrt � �I1crr rrrrr �ucrf R parr . � , rr 7}- J11. Subtri-Wed to l(amchameha. Development Corporation. B.P. Bishop Museurn, Honolulu. 1995 Ncar•rir l arta, Hcarrcari Isluracl .�lrchae'c r*ugrccal Recanncrrsscarace raf Severn Pcrrcef . Prepared for County of Hawaii Planning Department_ Burtchard, Cl. C. 1995 Poparladon and Laird --rise on the Kea itho r Coast, the ;tlorrka Lands Inventory Survey, Ketarhou, North Kow. Hcnv al `i Alcmd. the :•` "arra ive, pnrl 1. Subrnitled to Belt, Collins and Associates and Kamehanielia 111VO-, ient Corporation. I.AR fL Honolulu. Calis, 1„ M1 T, Carson, M. Dega and R.I., Spear 2004 Data Recraverr, ar the Phase I and 11 Portions of the Kahakcai Development Project ,4r•ec1T (3) 7-7-2()••1. SCS Report 2.09-1. Preparcd for Stanford Carr Development, LLC. SCS, Honolukl. Deport on lite at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Ciirlson. A.K.-and C fl. Rowndahi 1990 Areharealog ic-ul Inventor'v �Survev, Pualana DcrvelapmenlF - Phase II, Lairds of Pual.waca P and 2"`r, North Kona District; Island raf 1-lanwai. PH RI, Inc. report pn paned for Pualani Development Company, Report on file at the SHPT) Library, Kapo1m_. 139 Chinen, J.J. 1961 Orighml Lcmd Titles it? Hwvai'i. Clark, M., and R. Rcclurnan 2006 .,Iaf _.Ire-hiie;logicallfrvetrtofi, Srfncv ot'Tel K.3-7-6-00-1:003, H65huth.v 1-' Ahnpua'a, North Kona L7ivrricl. 1v1a d qf Hcawai'i. Reclitman Consulting Report RC -4360 prepared fpr r, Phil Tinguely, ):-Iplualoa Village Partners, LLC;, Kailua-Kana, Hawa.i`i. Conolly III, R.D., and 1. Curtness 1979 Reconnaissance Surve'v at the Komohona Kai Subdlvion ("Unit 1) Sde (TA4K. 3-7-0-13:31). Report prepared by Science Applications Inc., Honolulu for G.C. Developmeni Co., Inc. report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Cordy, R. 1991 A StmA, raf Pr~ehLvaric Social Change: The Developrrrem ol'Complex Socieriee in the Hall triran Wandv. Academic Press, New York. 1995 of Land and Natural Resources, State HIs(orwc Prc,.,c.rvation DIv-[ti-Inn, IlnnoluILL 2400 Exalted Sirs the Cht'ef: Mutual Publishing. Honolulu. Daws, G. 1968 Shoal of Time: A History of the Hawaiian Island. Macmillan, New York. Hestlets, M., and R. Rechtman 2004 Archaeological hirewor-t Su)') v -i- raf a Gr -cant Increment Roc:rd Rertrnanr I"rOpef•oa (7 AIK: 3- 7 -fa -08,-005 por'.), Hf-V;k rhta 1-2 Ahrrlart 7 'a, North Kotw Di fr'ici, I icmcl c?f Henetfi'i. Rechtman Consulting Roport RC -0244 prepared for Curt A. Cottrell, Na Ala Hele Program Manager, Hoticlulu, Hawaii and Ranson Percy de Ayala, Kla`a1111i Parmership, FlonoWILL, Iiwvai`i. Dircks, A., L. Zcnobi. and R. Rcch(man []eye, T. 2013 ArchueulugiCal Inver or'v S�rrve'v of the 1='owjm),w� r. l Mivr.w Farm ,tiidulivision (T. K.Y.-3-7-6-001: 003, 009, aml fll ]), 1161 drw 1-2 ,�har{racer, :Vorlh Koiia District, Island of Harr -errs. Rechtman Consulting Report RC -0856 prepared for Edward Rapoza, Kailua-Kana. 2011 A model -based age estimate for Polynesian colonization of Ha ai°i. ArchaeoloKj.- in ()ceania, 46:130-38. 140 Ellis. W. 1963 Alar•rative of'a Tour t?f M s UH, rrr- kyhee. Advertiser Publishing, Honolulu, Escoll, G, 2013 tra lruc�ralart,ic�rl fnventon' Sui'd'ev Rej)ort fErr, the SFr"oposcdAT&TWirele5:s 1 t k}cnrrrrr unieaitotrs Tori •car (HA W 311)Siie Located in Hr)hialoa I" Ahuprra `a. Alvah Kota District, Huufai 7 Hcruv `i JT'4ffK; (3) 7-6-024,-032]. SCS Report # 1340-2 prepared for Ace FTivironmental. Las Vegas, Escott. G., and S. Esc�)tt 2018 Archaeological Inventor); Surivv Re1mvi. for 1.0 Acres Lrxalerl it) Hafrraloa } yr Alrulma'a, North Kona District, Hcnvai'i Island, H"-ai'i [7,11K: (3)7-6-021.•017 Por.]. Prepared for East rest Really. SCS Report 1871, Honolulu. Escott, G. and N. Mello ESRI 2019a Burial Site Cvrntlronelrr of -a Burial Tr etmac is Plan o- Burial Siie #50-10-57- 30593 Locatud in }fulrralcxr f.f Alnel) rrcr'cr, North Kona Dittr•ic•t, Hzm ai'i I.skpiit1. Haivai'i f lr lig: ()7-6-021:00 71. Prepared for Kona Three, LLC, SCS Report 2137, Honolulu. 2019b Ari .4rMc;,htieologic~cil Preserti,rrrion Plari.lbr Sire #50-1()-57-30592 Lvcarecf In Hcilrrarkxr I" Ahulma'a, Nur•rli Ko? ea Di,s'tr•ict, ffatvai'i Ishumi, He waj'i [. K: (3)7-6-021.-016-019]. Prepared for Kona Three, LLC. SCS Report 2137, Honolulu. 2013 Arc GISC•.g)1or-er, Environmental Systems Research. Institute, Redlands, Ca, Fager, M., and D. Graves 1993 Archaeological fnvenror v Sur ve-v. Holualou 3rd Development Parcel, Land of- HalrlafaaY"` North KomDi.stric7, hw1arrcirnfHm jai'i(TAK.,3-7-7-#14:35). PNRl Report 1231-073092 prepared for Dillingham Partners. Google Earth 2013 Google Earth lrnacrgei:v. Google Earth. Mountain View. Ca. Chaves, D -K.. and S.T. tioodfLllow 1993.The Gar•dons rrl'Kona ReviSlIL-c{• Prrcrlemi Re�siclen iarl C'rrrrrrrranity Phase 1I- Archaeolf,q cvu Daect f.er do 01TIrcrlrtrcrcr P trn ?'' i North Kona District, Mand gf'Hamvii (I:UK:3-7-5-1:f: f?a)r•_?8, 29). PHRl, Inc. report prepared for Pualani Estates, Inc. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. 141 Han, T. L. S. L. Collins, S. D. Clark.. and A. Garland 1985 Moe Karr a Hca `odo: Hcawahan Alar-! arc 1'rcac:lice's al K'4-3rrr7. Kona, Hcnv ai'i. Chapter 'V"1[_ Artifacts and Manuports f ronr the Kebpir BL16,11 Site. Hislop Museum Departmental Report Serlos 86-1. SLrblaritted tci Department of Transportation, Honolulu. Handy, ES, 1940 The Hawaiian Planter, Volume L 1:3.P. Bishop Museum bulletin 161. B.P. Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu. Haimnatt, H.H. 1979a Archaeological SurvvY cif a 22 Acre Parcel at Holualou Ahuptaa `a, Hmvaii. Report }prepared by the Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc. Report on File at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. 1979b Arclacrcrcalrr,rrccal a rra € y orf a L? Acre Parcel cit Hohecdoc,r Ahup aca "c.r, Kona, Hmv at'i Island. Report prepared by the Archaeological Research Center Inc. for Kalani Sunset Corporation. Report on file at tlrc: SIIPD Library- Kapole . 1979c Ar•chcaenlogical Sit r•veY carrdE re avration at the Pr•oposed Korrtcrhan a Kai ,Standivision. Holmdoa, Kona, Hmrvcai"r Lilac r. ArchacoloRloal Rcscarch C'cntcr Hawaii, Inc. Manuscript. Prepared for G.C. DevelOprrrcnt CO., liac. 1980.Archaeological Svrvei- and Exccavarrow at the Proposed Kc inohcaraa Kar Subdivision HCMt aloe, Kona, Hawai "i Island. Report prepared by the Archacological Resc�irc h Center Hawaii, Inc. for G.C. Development Company, Inc. Report on tilc at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Hammat, H.H., D. Borthwick. and D. 5hideler 1986 Archaeological Sin-vev and E'xcm alions on a 20 -Acre Parcel Hc)Iu alcza, Kona, 1-1mr ai "i Island. R4wrt prepared by Cultural Surveys I law•ai i for 1Vlaryl Investments, Inc. Report on file at the SHI'D Library, Kapolei. 1-I.irrrniatt, 1.1- 1-1,. and S. D. Clark. 1980 Archaeological Testing card S alvagoe lv'xccavatrans af•cr 155 Acre (Ginter) Parcel in Na ahninta "a Pahoehoe, L a 'calrxr, ca ftl Kapala'alaea, Kona. HmVai 'i Island. ARCH Report 14-152 111. SUbinEtwd to Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. Flummatt. H.H., and. W.H. Folk 1980 Arc haeo1Q&,icc.rl Sar•vev. Phase 1.' Portions qf'Keauhon-Kona Resort, lac-aeflirrra crani Kahrtlrr'u. Kona, Hcnve i'i Islcard. ARCH Report 14-177 11.1. Subntitled to Kainehanieha Investment Corporation. 1981 Archaeological Szu-vec , r?f `ea 20 Acro -Perr rel, H'51trcrlou, Kona, Henv ai `i Island. Report prepared by the Archaeological Research Center Hawaii, Inc_ for Kala.ni Sunset Corporation, Report an flic tit flic Sl1PD Library, Kapolei. W Harnmatt, H.H., W.H. Folk, and D.W. Shidcler- 1992 Archaeological 5rrr°tv.v TeshneA conn L:xCuNIH017 Of a 174-Aere Poi -cel, Hoivalou,. North Kona, Hawai 4i. Report prepared by Cultural Surveys Hawaii for the Ganalon Corporation. Report can file ar the SHPD Library, Kapolei. 2007 Letter Report Documenting Arc'hcreohl i4h -id Stitch, Crary h a.ted, Find';. and Their Treatment ar u Proposed iWalia-Fcxrar; lY' Residential Developmeaar• Holtealoa Ahnpu a'a, North FCraraa, Hati+wai `l, Tl lA: 13r 7-6-021.016 ipor•. ). R4pa,rt prepared by Cultural Surveys 1250 oceanside Partliers, LLC. Report on rile nt the SHPT} Library, Kapolei Harnmatt, H. H., and V. W. Meeker 1979 Archaeolt)gical I.�xccavatiom and l-teiati Stcxbili.-atioti ext K ahCalt!'rt, Kiiorra, Hcnrtiri Island. ARCH Report 14-172([1). Submitted to Crerald Park, Urban Planner. Haun. A.E., and D. Henry 20100 Archaeological Inventory SurvLr TMK., 7-7-04.-56, H51rraloa 3, North Kona, Island of H awai'i. Haan & Associates report prepared for Mr, Sidney Fuke. Hilo, Hawaii. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei.. '?001 Archaeolagical Dol a Hecrruen, Sifts 14130 TitfK -- (3) 7 -5 -17 --.Por. 1. Prepared for Inaba Engineering_ Haun & Associates, Kea`au. Report on file at the SHPD Library. Kapolei. Haun, A. E., J. D- Henry, J. A. Jimenez, M. A. Kirkendall- K. Maly, and T. R. Wolibrth 1998 Alii High+rayF Phasd ltgatiorr f'r nga airy 1'lrfrsc� I-Arc:lraerlrag� cal Irrrepa.� i �F Suri•c'v. Srarnm ar-v, vat. I. PHRI Report 131.0-052798. Submitted to COUMV Of Hawai-i. PHRI, Hila. Hntnmon, R. J. 1986 Social Evolution to Ancient I lawaa`i. In Island Societies: Archaeological Ait)prf)f!a It '.,� rr! 171rlrrtiE#r7 crrrcl Ti-trarc{or•rrration, edrtccj by P.V. Kirch. pp, 55--88. University Press, Cambridge, Kahn, J., Rieth, P. Kirch. J. Athens, and G. Murakami 2014 Re -dating of the Kul i'ou ou rocl:shelter, Oahu, Hawai - i: Locationoi-fife first radiocarbon &te I'rom the Pacific Islands. ./QW -)701 0012c l'olti m'sjan Socieh?, 123(l):67-90, Karne`eleihia, L. 1992.Native Land and Foreign Desires: Pehea La E Porro A i.' Bishop Museum Press. Honolulu. Kelly, M- 1983 tVc alca r} JCnrra: C trtd tr.s cif ltinrrcx. Dept. of Authropology Report Series 83-2, Bishop Museurn. Honolulu. 143 Kirch, P.V. 1985 Feathered Gods and Fishhooks: An Introduction to Hawaiian Archaeologi, and Prehistory!. University of lhtwaii Press, Hnrrolulti 2011 When did the Polynesians settle Hawai `i? A re -view of 150 years of scholarly inquiry and a tentative answer. Haivafian ArchaeaPn r,, 12:3-26. Kirch, P.V. arid M. McCoy 20107 Reconfiguring the Hawaiian Cultural. Sequence: Results of re -dating the H51awa dune sitc (MO -Al -3), Molokai Island. Journaloj'rhe Polynesia Socicrr. 110:385-406. Kirch, P.V. and M. Sahlins 1992 Aracrf idn. Vol. 1 and 2. University of Chicago Press. Chicago. Kuykendall, R.S. N'S The, 1hio�uiian Kirrgcforn. Vol. I. University of Hawaii Press. Honolulu. Landrum. J., A - I., Hirkln, P.H. Roscndahl. and K.. De irr oIlt 1990 Irelrcic'r�lrr�ir cr! l�rs r artar] Survey c�etei l°.�r I:_ra crti�atr�arr.c lCrrlrucri !]cyclol}rrrerr# Prr)ierr Ary a. I31 lltl Report 157-0-70185. Prepared for Wilson Okamoto & Associltcs, PHRI, Hilo. R.epon on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Maly, K 1993 Ka `ao Ho'ornua Pu `rr4rwi No Ka-Miki, The Heart Story Story.' gj'Ka-Miki. Published in Hawaiian, in the newspaper "Ker H6kil o Hcnrai'l (Hilo) J=nary 13, 1914 through December 6, 1917_ Tran slatcd by Kepd k"!HIy fr}r Paul H_ Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc.. 1996 Historical Documentary Resc,Lirch, In. Archaeological Inventorr Surre'r Proposed ffkwr_r� Str^o of Extension Road Crrrr•idor, by Wulzera, W., T.#2, Wolf'orth. and LJ. Frattrklin, pp, 9-19. PPI II Ropon 1465-092696. Prepared liar Mary] Development, Kailua-Kona. PHRI, Hilo. Maly. K. and 0. Maly 20011 Ile Wahi A -fu `alelo M) NJ `Aina, A A4e Nd Alrr fluter f Hehi fa, Afen Keaarhon A I Kealakekiru, Ma .bona Katw°cti `i (A Historical 0,ervieir of the Lwi s, Attcl Trails Tr' vele d, Be nvean Kecarrhou and Kealakek tact, Kona, Haivai `r. Kumu Iona and Associates report prepared for" -Na Ala 1-1cle Program Manager(Hawrai`i Is] and), State Divisitrrz of Forestry and Wildlife, Hila. 144 2002 Ife c71ti Mv'c 1e1a 1 'f) h ca '. ! ur; r . 3 , c� 1Vcr '( ltcrrrir [ F€ ail i 'i , lel 't.7i1G[ 1CJA (K dance 0 l'l'almea, Kohalcr), A Ue Ka 'Aina Mauna: A Collection of TI -minions am flisroric•al Ac•c°ounts ol'the Lai ids crruf I amifies of iVaiki'i at Wa&510a (Gl•`cahnea Region, 1'mah !tahalc.F), and the Mountain LancA, IslcrndgfHawai'i (T1bfK Oven,ieii, .Sl eel 6 -7 -(Il). Kumu Pond Associates. Hila. Maly, K., and P.H. Rosendahl 2006 Phase 111.4rch aeolo dear! Sile Preservatimi Plem. Prig-114rrri aR f. iekaii6d Co) ajrrririii a - Mitigation Progrum. Lands of'Puapzraa P and ? �"'Nor(h Kona 04m Ie -i, Islam] of I rkr•ai'i (TMK..3-7-5-17:28, 29). PHRL Inc. report prepared for Schuler Homes. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. McCoy, M. 2005 The development of the Kai aupapa fieldsystem, Koloka'i Island, Hawaii. Joirrrral of the Polrnesicm Soc fety, 116,339-58. 2007 Revised lateH€?locene culture history forMoloka`i Island, Hawal'l. Radiocarbon, 49(:1):1273-1322. Menzies, A. 1920 Hovvar'i Nei 128 Years Ago, Frlited by W.F. Wilson. New Fre.eedniii Pres, Honolulu. Mulrooney, 11tM, S. Bickler, M. Allen, and T. Ladefoged 2411 High -precision elating of colonization and settlement in East Polynesia. Proceedings g1'the JVaticar a1AcademY (# Scicnces, 108:E192 -E194. National Geographic, Top•ol 2403 Seamless DISCS Topographic Maps an CD-ROM, Hmvai'i. National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Washington, D.C, Nelson, D., L. Bulgrin, and R, Rechtman 2005 �Qrr a4r rhue #{ogicu{ 1n�entor►Sctry �► rr '7' 110.°3- -t -t1 }3. (](JA', N tliitrlrx� }.si 2rrd Alirrizita'a, lVot-th otiaDirtricl, fslcnidc?f H iaf-ii'i. Rechtman C OVSLilting Report RC -0251. Prepared for Nearon Enterprises, LLC. Danville. C'alilorma. (Revised 2006). Newman, T. S. 1, 970 1lawaiian Fishing and Far ming on the Island q f'ilawaii A.D. 177& Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu. Puked. M.K., S. Elbert and E. Mookin] 1974 Place Xarrres gfHmmii. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. 145 Rechtman, R.B. 2006 Ari Archaeologic�gl lrrvelrton7 Saaan�e? ref TMK.3-7-013:017 )111 [1( 1-2 Ahnpuax'a, North Kow Dia•trid, lslanadvfHcawai 'i. Report Prepared by Rechtrrian Consu16ng, LLC for Geometrician Associates, LLC. Report on rile at the SH PD Library, Kapolei. Riede, Timathy M., Terry L. Hunt, Carl Lipo, and Janet. M. Wilmshurst 2011 The 13th Century Polynesian Colonization ofHawai`i Island, Journal raf 4rchaeological Science 35:2740-2749. Rosendahl, M. 1988 Archaeological Reconnaissance Sara= !, Holualoca 3rd Development Parcel. Land raf H61tialoa Y� North Kona, fa;land of Hmvai `i (TMK: 3-7-04:35). PHRI Report 400-122.2137 prepared for Dillingham Trust. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapole%. Roslvndahl, P. 1975 Arehoeoletgrcwt Rveonnaisscance.5rinw'v of the 72-1,7nii Developme,rt .Sire (T1rlTK:3- 7-6-14:3 arrcf 3-7-7-04:22,23.27,47)Kt7ilita-IKort[a lslctttd of.Huwai'i. P11 R1 Report 5-122075. Prepared for Gray. Rhee and Associates. 1989 4rchaeofr qxicaf Field Inspection. Komoha na Keri Su division Parcels, Land nf. Holnctfiacr I" card.?" 1lforlh Korrct, Island of Hrnvai 'i (7i K: 3- 7-6-22: 49.84). PH M Letter Report 44-121.181 prepared for Clyde Coatney. On file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Sato, H., W. Ikeda, R Paeth, R Smythe, and M. Takehiro Jr. 1973 Steil . 1r11 cr1' aaf Lslcrlacl rrj #fia11 c1ii, State gl'HawaiL United States Department of Agric.uEture Soil Conservation Service. Washington D.C. SehilL R. 1984 Subsistence and C nrlffict in Kona, Hca+rxai `i; An .-I ri- laeofogical .Four, <rf the Kiarxklarr' Ifzghvvra_v Real gnmenr Corridor, Deparrniont cif Anthropology, BY, Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Report prepared for the Hawaii Department of Tratisportal ion. On file at the SHPD Library, Kapold. Sinoto, A. 1979 Archaeologica Recvrtarcrissaracc Stawy of ,9x Acnes in the Ahuptrcr'a ojHohfaloa 1 enact'?, Nonh Koin Hanv ai'i. Department of Anthropology, 13.P. Bishop Museum, HnittalUILL Prepared for Brehm Construction Company. 146 Soehren, L 1979.a Leiter Report: Parcels 10, 12, acid 13 ref TMK. 7-6-14, hrHO[ual6a, North Kona. Prepared for Mr. Hiroshi Kasamoto. 1979b Letter Report: TMK: 7-6-15:15, H&ualm, Alorth Karya. Prepared for Zuzak and Associates. 1980a bwer wid }{iworical Features on the Parcel fdentijied kv Ter. Prepared for Golden Triangle Real Estate. 1980b Lelie andHisturical Features on 1Frc Parcels Identrj ed bv }ir.r .Thip Kc11-,; 7-0-14:2,3 at 1101naloa 2, and 7-7-04: Z.Q'1 ,-17 at H5111 lew 3, :4`r)r rlr i c)1ra, flcr+Vcti't'.1'reparrA for BA and M Corp. Stair Enuironmen(al 2016 Botanical and Faunal Survevs in the State ofHawai`i. Makawao. wivxv',starrenv1ran nientaI.corIII . Tairrrcr_ .C. A. 1973 The Social Correlates of Mortuary Patterning at Kalokv, North Kana, Hawaii_ Archaeolo t and Phl sical , w lyr opolo&w in Oceania 8(1 ) :1-11. Tomonari-Tuggle, M_ J. 1990 4rchrrularr`cal Ir7� cfrrrcrr v Stct'cJl crf1ck1'i}}f�prtt€yrfi11'c�rcel61't}rcf if>urrJrcru 1~"ea�ar°t,Ittrprre� "a ]cxhtlrr "rr, t"y int f}t krrct, %dcarltc of Han,�cri `i. Prepared for Belt Collins and Associates. International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc. Honolulu. U.S. Geological &imey 1925 15-Mirmle Series Tol"gvaphic Hilo Quadiwazh,,Wap. USGS Print, Washington, DC. URL 147 Vancouver, G. 1967 A Voi-age rtf'Discca7 eiy to the Nor-Ih Pac- fFc� Ocean, and .4mund etre Wbi-ld. Robinson and Edwards. London. 1984 A 1'rav(L e ol'Discaver-j` to the :Ford? pia °iflc Ocean, and.4mund the klrar•Id. Robillsoll and Ldwards. Lond4in.. Waihona `Aina 2014 V15hele online database. www.waihona.uorn. Walker. A.T., and F.H. Rosendahl 1988 .Arc haeolu� foal Reconnaissance Sttrnti e'v. Puttlani Srncelivi.+ion, Lands ttf Naptrau "` i t tli l ortu l rs tt ice, 1,slctttcl rrf l{c{+ stir. PH RI. hic. report prepared for Pualani Development Company. Deport on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Wilkes, C. 1845 Narrative ref the Urrited Stat(r.s Ex#3lor•ing Expedition During the Y'ear's 1938-I842. f-_� erirc(f'1dos. Lea & Blanchard, Philadell?ltia. 1970 Narrxivc rjl dw Unhed State> Fyploi1) g Frpedition During the Years 1938-1841. Vols, l--5 ,irrcf ettla,s, Lea & 13lam-hui-el, P1lifimA,1lr,faia. Wilmhurst, J., T, Hunt, C. Lipa, and A. Anderson 201 la High -precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid colonization of East Polynesia. Pro eerlifWs c /'1hi ,Nrltir rtcrl l4cad p af'Scienres, 108:1815-20. 2011 b Reply to Mulrooney et aL: Accepting lower precision radiocarbon dates results in longer colonization chronologies for East Polynesia. Proceedings (#'Ihe 108:E 195. Wolfe. E.W., and J. Morris 1994 Geological M'.ap of the Island of i-lawai`i. U.S.G.S. Miscellaneous Investigations Series. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. Wolforth, 7., J. Hetvey, and R. Rechtnian 2000 Archac-oft)giccxl ltra°c�ittor)� ,S'trrveyref Two Parcels• tar , frltrcilrxi 2iidcrud 3rd; North Kom l.W(ria lsland gfllaw a'i `r. PHRI Report 1341-080999 prepared for Mr. Ralph. Berezan. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. 148 APPENDIX A: REINTERMENT DOCUMENTATION A-1 �sr tea* AW RU, —V -W err AA*AW'farp -LAIC� jWj-' f [3. kLw Mardi 19, 199s Mr. Edward 11Ayinx State Iiistori.r Fr*sgbrV*t).Qrn U�tviaion Department of Larkd 4 Alatt1jrA1 Resountc9 state Of flarrall 33 South [Ins Street Gth F1D*r ilonolulu. "&well 96815 Re., Burl*13 Gamrex, rtxc. lrnna Vistas Subdjir j �,Q;j IN11"alna North Kenn$ iraw-Atj Aerar lid. Pursuant tv our phone �anrct+�at#tQ4'A '.r-rgQr-4Itwg the decision of the Burial Council. mays I toriflrrr� a#�e #aYlaf�ring. The council of detrrlcd that the Site located in the South - for corner of the $k4bd4v4sion near 911011ana Street is s ccePtasb o for ail threw: (3) burials. A six foot sleep hole will 68 excavated of surficiert 4'X4'X4' hear sizae to asccc+►rodata a (of t1le type used fair aloctr#cal connnctions) with no b*ttaa and a L=ever. The remains will be burled nn ar about April 1, 1993. The hole will be backfilled over the cOver of the box to ground jvve, atftar reburial. I have asked our contractor to lecture a ladder jr, the hale for you -%0 that 'You caal get dnw,rn to the box oarely. Uomrcx author.lLas you to enter on site tto b area for the servtres on April 1, 1g93al � o the burial Please contact ate with the exact here Ht' and date poto. the cerenany. Please note thatou y our will he 2110wad on 31te at your solo riax andcthat iGnIwrexers and or its contractors will not be held liable for any dsmages and/or injuries shOuld their occur. Thank Yalu for your assist2nCe that in the settlewaew3t or wwyattor, Pi,esee contatct me when you have set the date for the reburials. S Gregg a l�ltila cc, Uaanrex, Inc. Isemoto Contracting A-2 fae .. a4+ . C[''44_..ii]]aa.�]y ``���..tt STATE OF�y�yy�1y HAWAII A V//f�llyy ppi�pj serf Ftc FIMATY�F4RiIVikK7M 13 ■CUTH KWM FTRL'CT, M FLOM HOMOLULU. M111Nk,2 94113 Xpri l 5, 1943 Gamrex, Inc 75-127 Lunavule Road, Smite 14 KALI ra, KCna, Hawal' i 967AO eV1% GCPY'rrA1 JG .. LC/PGM J EOYA L Kk*A1r S .KLAhvc UPHANMWM%e �IMM�YriiAL /mmW CONNM 40 fabhomconk"Llw1f awrrY Wcss r%W%LbT r MR — Pw"m PPgW'xWJ]LLq, d,is"D. 6 -AD "Noo Re! Fei.n,terrnant of gavaLijan Skeletal Remains, Tex Ties Key 7 -+5 - Dear Mr. Xashaaa: -chis 1a to notify you that an the oveniing tit April 1, IRWJ, the three mats cf Hawaiian ramainra recovered Iron the above nentlonnJ prup®xty were rsapectfuily r*intsrxad. Thank yeU E*r your c0cpasation and asSLMnes t M0tjrltrcv►rr trim important matter. If r&sre drg any guaztj() s, please cd:mtact raward Halealoha ]Ayaw, Engq at 987-0616. sincere. , , AdninLgtrakor afzte iliat*ric Pre-sexvation Division C; Edward L.H. Kamhala, {Chair, Hawai` i Burial Coun_il A-3 APPENDIX 6: Archaeological Preservation Plan SCS PRilJ>=("r ? X52-1 AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL PRESERVATION PLAN FOR SITE #50-10-57-3059 2 LOCATED INHOLUALOA 1"1 AHUPUA`A, NORTH KONA DISTRICT, HAWAII ISLAND, HAWA161 ITMK: (3) 7-6-021:016-0191 Prepared by: Glenn Escott, M.A. and Nicole A. Mello, M.A. MAY 2020 Prepared ibr: Kola Three, LLC 1 I t Hu.alalat 5t. Hilo, TIT 96720 SCIE,NTIFTC +l_.CNSFI:I-ANT SI.f#410EN Inc -rte 1347 Kapi-okini Boulevard. Suite 4118 Honolulu. HT 5)(,81 Havvai'i Wand OffiC�,: PO Box 135 Kc:3`au. [it 96749 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLEOF .'......... .......... —_'—........... --'—.--..—_...... ___ ....... ___ ....... —'.I LIST OFFIGURES ........ —.................................. ................. ...... '...... ....................... ....... ....... II LISTOFTABLES ......... .......................... ~....................................................... ............... ............. D7 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS. ...... ..—........ —.,,,~,~.,....,...,,,''................ 6 PRE -CONTACT ERA .... ........ ............ .................... ....... ......................... ........ .... -.-8 The Kona Field System ........ ............. '............... ........ __.—''.--.-_....... ........ 9 POST -CON [A(.[LRA................................ ................. —.............................................. 10 7'FIE rHAJH2LL.--... .............. ................... .............. .................. ...................... ........ l2 PREVIOUS Ag{.11A[{)[O{|I[,/\L ST[DUES.^^........ ^........................ ....... .............................. .16 R-E600NAJ-PREV100S AR/ClI AEOLQGICAJ-STUD8ES--__.—.--.—~,—...... -'^]9 AIS SIGN IF[[ANC]GASSSG8MLNT8..................................................................................... ]3 REFERENCES CITED .................................. .............. ................................ ............................... 41 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: 5.500 K -Series Map of Hawai'i Island Showing Location of Site Project Area (National Gcographic Topo!, 2003. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS) . ............................. I ....................................................... I .................... ........ ........ 2 Figure 2: 7.5 -Minute Series USES Topographic Map Showing the Location of Project Areas and TMK Parcels (Kealakekua Quadnanglc. SSRI, 2013. Data Sources-, National Geographic and County of Hawaii Planning Department, 2019)................................. 3 Figure 3. Aerial Photograph Showing Project Area, Hblualoa, H1, Zone 5 forth, 189445 rn E, 2171790 in N. (ESRL 2013 Intake. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye. Earthstar. USDA, and USGS)....................... __ ........... _ ........ _ .......... __ ........ ...... _ ...... 4 Figure 4: Aerial Photograph Close -Up Showing Project Area, Halualoa, Hl_ Zone 5 North, 189445 m L, 2171790 m N. (ESRI.. 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Glebe, GcoEye, Earihstar- USDA, and USGS)........................................................ ................ 5 Flpre 5: Map of 1401ualoa I" and 2`1 Ahupuwa Showing Loc"ation of -Project Area in Red Border (Alexander 18-55)................................................................................................ 7 Figure 6: Purtion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Railroad and Project Area (US(.,S 1928) ................... ............. I I Figure 7: Portion Lfl'Kailua Section, North Kcma Map Showing Location of LCA 7713 and Project Arca In Red Border (Aki 195'1.._.,.,.. ...... ...... ...... ____ 13 Figure 8: 7,5-M-Muto Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Land Com mission Awards, Land Grants, and the Project Area (National Geographic Topo% 2003, Kadua Quad. Data Sourccs: National Geographic Society, USGS)....,. 14 Figure 9: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Previous Archaeological Studies and Pro ' ject Area (Keatakekua Quad, ESRI, 2013. Data Sources- National Geographic Society, USGS) ............................................................ 18 Figure 10- 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topobrrapl;ic Map Showing Location of Northern Portion of Hairiniatt eL a]. (1992) Sites and Current Project Area (FSPH, 201 1. Sources. National Geographic Society, USGS, Kcallakektia QLIadtangle)................ ... 25 Figure H. 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Locations ol'Escott and Escott (20t8) AIS Project Area Archaeological Sites (ESDI. 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS_ KcnInkckua Quadrangle).,._......,,.,,.,,,......,........ 30 Figure 12: Photograph ol'Site 30592 Railroad Berm Rail Bed, Looking South (25 cril scale)_, 35 Figure 13: Photograph of Site 30592 Railroad Bean. Retaining Wall, Looking Southeast......... 36 Figure 14: 7.5 -Minute Sorics USGS Topographic Map (Kauitioa and Puu. Pohakuloa Quads) Showing Location of Project jec( Area, Archaeological Sites and Preservation Easements (ESRI 2013. Data Sources: NASA, NGS and USGS)..... .................... ...... 38 Figure 15: Portion of TMK: (3) 7-6-021 Map Showing, the Locations of Site 30592., Preservation and Access Easements, and Access Breach ............................................. 39 M LIST OF TABLES Table I - Land Commission Awards Recorded in fiQlUaloa I" and 2"' Ahupua`a. ..................... 15 Table 2: Imentory af`Previous Archaeological Invcstigatimis........ ---- ...... .............. ..............., l6 Table -. Invtntory c3i Previously Recorded Archaeological Sites (Harnmatt et al. 1992; 11ammatt and Shideler 2007). .., - ---- -- ......... ......... -- ............ ........... — ...... 26 Table 4: Inventory of Archaeological Sites Identified on the AIS Projeet Area (Escott and Fsc:ott 2018), ................................................................................................................. 29 Table 5: Inventory of F.scoff & Escott (21120) Archaeological Sites. ......... -- ............... 32 INTRODUCTION As requested by the Rawai`i State Historic Preservation Division (SH.PD) in a letter dated May 31, 2018 (Log No. 01 S.U1 123, Doc No. 1805SN05) (Appendix A), Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) produced this Archaeological Preservation Plan (PP) for Site 450-10-37- 30592 (hereafter referred to as Site 30592) located on a portion of TMK: (3) 7-6-021: 016.019 in Ilblualoa Int Ahupua`a, North Kana District, island ofHawai`i, liawai'i (Figure I through Figure 4, and Figure 14 to Figure 15). The owner is proposing to develop the property and contracted SCS produce this PP as required for a County of Hawaii planning Department grubbing and grading permit application. Prior to writing the preservation plan, a search of geological inaps, aerial photos, historical maps, historical documents, land titles, land -use docrurients, and previous archaeological reports was conducted. A summary of the; research is included in this preservation plan. The preservation plan was prepared in accordance with Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) § 13-277 r'Lxlcs for ite archaeological prctservation. The property is owned by Kona. Three, LLC. The contact person for Dona Three, LLC: is Mr. Richard Wheelock. Mr. Wheelock can be reached by phone at (908) 753-3167, and by email at richardCjeastwestrealty.org. His mailing address is 700 Bishop Street Honolulu, fil 96813-4112, ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Site 30592 is a portion of the Historic era Kona Sugar Company railroad bed and berm located along the eastern boundary of the project area of an undeveloped portion of'TMK: (3) 7- -021:016-019. The prinject area is located between 300 and 660 feet (1 10 to 201 meters) above mean sea level (ams.1) on fairly steep sloping land with level :areas in between elevation breaks. The land is a small portion al' a larger former cattl c ranch and agricultural area that was started in the early 1900s. The lower portion of the project area is still used to pasture cattle. The project area and surrounding lands were bulldozed sometime betwacii the 1940s and 1970x. Evidence of bulldozing is visible in aerial photographs as alternating bands of cleared bulldozer tracks and bands of push pile. Pedestrian surVCY c;onfirnted the linear bands in the aerial photographs are bulldozer -cleared paths and linear piles of b0fdoa.ed rock along the cleared hulldo7cr pallzs. fl i M1 i' V Figure 1: 5,500 K-Scries NeTap of llawai'i Island Showing Location ofSite Project Area ('National Gcographic Topo% 2003. Sources; National Geographic Society, USGS). 2 1 1 , IAUZ. i6, M � I i - --- - - . - --" P- 11 7I ON Nm. Figurc2; 7.5-Nlimilc SeficsUSGS Topographic Map Slim iif lay Location ol'Pro.ivo Arcio oild TMKParccls (Kealakcktrt Quadrangk. ESRI.2013 DotaSowces: Natioml Gockgnjphi� 2IILICOkM.',-0t'llMLi illumiligDepininieK 2019). 3 Flgure I Aerial 1' IOIL),',T' ph ShOWhl l'roioct Area, I1161ualoa, FII. Zone 5 Nattlt 189445' 30 F. 21717_x[} in N. {I SR.1, ?4113 Image. Data Sotu%Qc-,: Digital (I [col .yc. I:anIistai. l SDA. and USGS ). Figure 4: Aefiq] Photograph C! .-]I SIJ0%; ill L Pmiec I A roLi. I I I L /ODC ; Norlh. I x044; 'li 1'. 2 1 -.'1 71A I n? N fF SRI - 2013 Image. Daly Sourcc4-- D I g1lid G'o he. G kA1 I.% V. t-.JI'L I% ,lLl L I %D:1- i HILI VS (IS). The project area ground surface is a Hualalai lava flow dating between 5,000 and lU,M) years before present (ybp) (Wolfe and Morris 1996). Sail in the project area is Punalu'u Series (rP"YD series) extremely rocky peat with six to twenty percent slopes (Sato 1973:45). The majority of the project area has been bulldozed in the past and the present ground surface is rocky soil. Rainfall in the project area is very low, less than thirty inches per year. There is a seasonal gulch <don -the southern edge of the project area. This region is extremely dry, hot. and somewhat barren except for thick Califorrtiagrass (Urachloa enwicu). Guinea grass (Megalhvrxus ina_rirr us), and some koa haole (Leucaena leueocephola), rliavve (f r osopis pallida), and kukrri nut (Aleurites woluccana) trees (Starr Environmental 2016). HISTORICAL AAD CULTURAL CONTEXTS Kona is divided into two sections: worth Kona or Kona "akmi, and, South bona, or Kona hema (Maly 1996). Marra ,akcm was further subdivided into north (called Kekaha) and south (called Konaktai'vpna) areas, with. the division between the two at the ahlipua'a of Kea huolu. The project area is in Holual oa l" Ahupua` a (Figure S) within the area ofKonakai'vprra in Marra `akar. H61ualoa means (literally) "long sled course" (1'ukui ei al. 1974:45). Halualoa l tit is a traditional c7hulm47 `a stretching from the ocean to the moot of Hual �Ial in the uplands. The cowfine of Holualaa 1 se Ahupua"a. is primarily low rock, cliffs. Very little is recorded of Mlualoa Ahupua'a in traditional oral accounts. The Heart Stirring Legend oj'k'a-Miki, published in the Hawaiian language newspaper Ka IYolat o Rawar'i and translated by Maly (1993) contains the only description of lidlualoa. The legend is set in the 1.3'h century bUt also reflects more recent influences (Maly and Maly -1002: 17). rol Figure'-;: Map of 1131uahm 1" and 2`1 Ahupua`a Sliowing Location of Project Area (Alexander 18551. According to the narrative, The lands Of H«lualoa were narned foi' the chief of that name; both 1161ualoa and Puapua`a were high chiefs, who controlled the lands from mountain to sea, which bear their names... Kaluaokalani served as a priest of Holualoa at the temple of Pakiha, This heiutr was near the contest field ofHolualca... The lands of this re ion are named for various a10 .1 all of whom were related. When the chiefHoivaloa took tap the challenge against Kepaka`iIi`ula can behalf of the Kana chiefs, 1*16lualoa called upon his gGd ie'd1dipdhex7 to assist hirci in bis battle... Holualoa was the first chief to call upon the god KzdaijOhou, and this was the beginning of this gads' use by the chiefs of Hawaii [Maly 1993:208-209]. PRE -CONTACT ERA Halualoa., Kona, and much of the leeward side of"Hawai `i Island, while well populated at the time of European Contact, were settled later than the windward side. This in part may be due to the fertile land, numerous streams, and abundant rainfall Ort the windward side (Maly 1996:3), Many archaeol4sts believe that Hawaii Island was first settled around A.D. 1,004 by people sailing from the Marquesas (Athens et al. 2414; Dye 2011; Lahti et al. 2014; Kirch 20111 Kirch. and McCoy 2007; McCoy 2005 and 2007; Mul.rooney et al, 2011: Reith et al. 2011:1 Wilmhurst et al. 2011a and 2011b).. During early settlement of the leeward side permanent habitations were established in Kona concentrated along the shoreline and lowland slopes (Cordy 1981, 1995; Schilt 1994). Infonnal fields were cleared at higher elevations where rainfall w -as higher. Between AD 1200 and 1400, habitation and agricttltttre expanded across the slopes and coastal area ofllualalai (Burtchard 1995; Cordy 1995). The initial cons,ArLtc110n of the Kona Hold System (KFS) began approximately between AL) 1400 and 1600 lSchilt 1984 The development of these extensive formal walled fields coincides with a dramatic population increase and with the development of the stratified chiefdom structure which is reflected through large residential complexes .and hei atr (Buitchard 1995; Cordy 1981; Haun cl al- 1998; Hommon 1986; Schilt 1984). Thus, there was a ticed to expand the previously limited agricultural base_ The royal centers and larger heiau were in place by AD 1604 to 1800 reflecting the gro-wily in grower of the rulers and chiefs in the rcgion (Barrera 1971; Haintnatt and Folk 1980). Royal centers were located at Kailua, H61ualoa, Kahalu`u, Kealakekua, and Honaunau (Cordy 1995). 8 The region ofHolualoa developed into a royal center in the late 1600s to early 1700s under the reigns of Keakamahaua (reigned 1680-1700) and Keakealaniwahine (reigned 1700-1720) (Cordy 2000:244). Many 'calr'i and kuvohik-t residences and numerous religious sites are known to have existed here. The majority of the lteiau and. royal residences were constructed along or near the coast, most notably at Kafnoa Point south of the project area. The royal center at Holualoa was eclipsed in the second half of the 1700s by the royal center in the Kahalu`u and Keauhou region. The Kona Field System The Kona Field System extends north at least to Ka`u Ahupua-a and south to Honaunau, west from the coastline and east to the forested slopes of Hualalai (Cordy 1995). During his travels in 1823, William Ellis noted the extensive field systctn divided with "low stone walls, made of fragments of lava", producing "bananas, sweet potatoes, mountain tare, tapa trces, mclons and sugar Cane- and-Hourishing luxuriantly in every direction" (Handy and Haiidy 1940:114 and 162). Many of the archaeological projects conducted within Kona deal with components or the Kona Field System (Cordy 1995„ Newman 1970; Schilt 1984). Tlic kala zone of the Kona Field :Sysum is fi-om. Sea level to 150 m ams]. This vane is <tssoc laced with habitations along the shoreline and cultivation of sweet potatoes (ualta), paper mulberry (vvauke). and gourds (ipu). Cleating mounds, planting dclircssiow, planting mounds, planting terraces, and modi bed outcrops are common agricultural features in the koala zone (Hammatt and Clark 1980, Hamman and Folk 1980; Haun et gal. 1998; Schilt 1984), Permanent habitation including royal and high chiefly centers as well as non-aigicultural activities such as fishing, ceremonies and burial practices were usually concentrated along the shoreline zone portion of the kala zone. The higher elevation zones are the kzdn 'aalar zone, iajrc et zone and the 'am a `u zone. The currcnt projcet area is in the kalaWhr zone. This wetter region is above 150 m arnsl where bread fruit. sweet potatoes (lpc tnoea batutus), ti, (Coo-dWine nticoru) wauke (Broussanciirararo (C-cflrwasl a esvidenta), sul-ar cane (Sac:charvin sp.), and other arboreal crops were grown (Kelly 1983, Menzies 1920). The 'aper'a zone is above the ka h `talu zone. Hawaiians cultivated melons, sweet putatoe.s, !i, bananas, tarn, wauke and sugar cane in fields with low stone walls. The highest zone, the `traatca'rr zone, was used to grew bananas and plantains in walled fields.. The "ager `a zone and the `earrra`u 9 zone were als« used to collect timber and catch birds therefore temporary habitations were constructed.. POST -CONTACT ERA. During the post -contact era, the Kona Field System was exploited and the planting of coffee, sugar, sisal, citrus, and cotton took over original Hawaiian crops until c� eni.ually the land was used for cattle pastuic. The first cattle and sheep were brought to the island by Vancouver in 1793 and 1794 ( Vancouver 1967). Horses. mules, oxen, goats. and donkeys were brought shortly allcr. Feral cattle;, sheep. and goats overran agricUllus•al tields by 1813 to 1815 (Ellis 1963: 291; Wilkcs 1970: 204). By 1848, in the Kana District, a Great Wall (the Kuakini Wall) was constructed from Lanihau to `4 nouli to keep them away from homes and agricultural areas (Maly and Maly 2001:286). Formal cattle ranching began in the Kona region in the mid -1800s. The Dona landscape evoivcd rapidly with the hl.1-11 Of the century. The rapid growth of the sugar industry produced the Kona Sugar Company in 1899. A► railroad was built in 1901 to help sustain this influx in produce. It was later used to haul lumber and freight along with the sugarcane. The rail line was seven miles long and extended from liblualoa to Keapuka (Figure 6). Catton, tobacco, and sisal were grown in the dryer lands below the railroad (Kelly 1983). The changing subsistence and tirade regimes developed by incoming European and American settlers, as well as other historical factors, caused a depopulation of the coastal areas of Kona. Ranches were established al nilddle grid upper elevations, and farms were established in the uplands where rainfall k% -as higher and the temperatures were cooler. Cattle ranching and clearing for sugar cane anti coffee removed many of the endemic species of plants. The suite orvegctation that existed prior to the pre -Contact era were replaced by k-oa haole (Leircaena leitcac plmila), kimve (Prosopis pallida), and other newly introduced invasive plant species. 10 I � LC rICIIFP.( I - L A., p,4-;. "i", ; No, h. I A v P�,4 fit is Z 1IL'Ah- �J Figure 6: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Railroad and Project Area (USGS 1928). 11 Schools, churches, stores, and other businesses were also established in the uplands. During the late 1800s and early I900s, coastal Kona was no longer the densely populated sociopolitical center it once was. It became a small cluster ofhouses along the trail f ono Kailua Bay to Keauhou (Tomonari-Tuggle 1993:15). Homesteads, ranches, aircl plantations developed in the uplands daring this period as reflected in the pattern of Land Commission Awards (LCA) and Land Grants (LG) recorded during the Whele (Escott and Escott 2018). The project arca is just enakai (west) of most of the land comrrrissiou awards and is at the same elevation as portions of the land grants in the region. Based an historic documents, the project area and surrounding lands were likely being used for subsistence: and commercial agriculture, as well as for cattle pasture from the mid to late I SOO& The project area aright have been used later than surrounding lands because of its steep slopes and eery rocky soil, but based cin aerial photographs, the project area was bulldozed sometime around (lac 1950s in lircparation for commercial agriculture. T11E M,-WELF, The Land Commission awarded the majority ofHolualoa I" and 2"a Ahupua`a to Victoria, Kamamalu Ka`ahumanu IV, Kuhima Nui ofHawai`i Island and Crown Princess of Hawaii as Land Commission Award (LCA) Number 771.3, `Apana 43 (Figure 7). Several smaller LCA and LG properties were also recorded in the upland region of E 151ualoa 1" and 2"d Ali upua`a (Figure S). Twenty four Land Commission awards were recorded in H61ualoa I" Ahupua`a. the ahupua`a where the project area is located (Table I ). A portion of LCA #3660 to John G. Mand makes tip a ihin strip of land heated through (lie center of the current project area. With the notable exception of LCA #3660 and a few other large LCAs, the average award was 2.8 acres, most (n-=16) were for less than 3.0 acres. Three Land Grants (LG 41592, 1602, and 3630) were also recorded in. H61ualaa l" and 2"" Ahupua`a. LG ##1.592 was a 25.0 -acre parcel sold to Kealallo and LG #3630 was a 38.2 -aero parcel sold to W.H. Cromwell. Almost all of the awards and grants were used as subsis-tcnce and commercial 13rm land, and some were used to pasture cattle (Escott and Escatt 2018). 17 Vigure 7: Portion of Kallua S ectiun- North Ko mi N IMl i I sLl Location of LC A 7 713 and Project Area (Aki 1952). 13 A1`51 L Jf k4 0 7 9q :1�1 Figure 8: 'l,fl-NllRL[tC SCI -105 USES Topograptic NLl p Shc,%% Ing LocaiPjji uf Land Coiiia-ussjon Awards. Lnnd Grants. and Lhe Pro.jeci ATV4 kNttiowl (Icognphic I ("!, 2003, K',LiILLLi Q11.3d. DZIL41 Geogaphic S(Xdoty, uscis), 14 Table 1. Land Comm i ssion Awards Recorded in HOlUaloa I" and 2`1 AhLlpaa- LCAO A'L' AR1)ED TO All I LITUVA ACRES 3660 %kntj 111-5 439i Kckoi 114711 LQ as 1.7 5552 Kauila I 10]Ua�oa 1 1.9 5554 Keaweko[olie 110 1 LQ 71,1 1 5795 Kelhkanakaoic 11;,1.1.1.x1 2.2 5910 Knopukauila I wl I I I'Ll., 0a 1 74 5993 Lei prola pala I 1 '5 1 J-c.la 211E -3.0 6063 Hi -,:11,1 K-Ima`oa 1" 19 6107 Na 111 1 h-) I UIL', Ift 3.94 _9It Ku;jaEm 1.,[ 4,15 arm K 2 -).5 7340. b Ko 1.3 744 1 1161 LQ 0 1 `' 1.94 loltial(,;i "& 7713 KamamaluLarge H,-11.1, , jo , I 7746 KaTllakalo I WI I I ILL', 1�1 I': 7794 Knum im 799() Pupuk-i 111-1 1 t u. oa M15 Aipo IA 8151 flehenaT- 7 k, I X la, as -),3 8223 lkaiaka I lo I t la Oa 5 9915 Limahana I jo t t I a oa 1" 142 9932 Lumaawe l 1< I I LM 1 2,98 10770 Pimone I I,) ILIl 0,1 106 1"It1alo'l I`& 10400 Naiilmnk�iuhi 3J H51u,don 2`1 15 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES There are at ]teast 26 previous archaeological rcports fOr lands ncar the current project area, including studies in Puapual`a 2"t and Mualoa I", 2"d, and 3"d Ahupua`a (Table ? and Figure 9). The stt{dies were conducled from the {:€ as[ to roughly 1,460 ft atnsl and enccaipass the d-idu region (0-500 ft), the J alu'ulu region (500-1,000 ft), and the lover portions of the 'Zym a region (1,400-2,5CW ft). Results of the previous; < rcltacologica.l steadies arc summarized below by elevation: studies numbered l through 1 s its I ablo 2 and Figure 9 sire situatod from the coast io [ween Ka`ahutnanu R Pzhwaw- 0-3t 0 ft amsl), studies 16 through 21 are located fi"om above the Queen Ka`ahumat`Iu Hit hwav to just below Hualalai road (306-760 It anisl), and studies 22 thrOLIg 1 24 ark4 above T lual al a Read to just above MamalAoa Highway (1, 100- 1.460 it am sl). Fable 2: inventory of Previous Archaeological Invecli�;aliorlti. PrnJeet Number Reference Type of Study Area in Acres Resa ts. Fi ure 131 I Landrum et a[, 1990 Ar h;�c��lny real i 1; A 46 Sites InvenlL) Sun c4 Calk et al. 2(104 r 1}Ileiel�l !uJll r)rilal NIA 10 Sites R4'L'i}k L,]-% — Carlwm 8, Rel,.,v3xJ;J1}1 :Arch jin)I;i4rl�aI 65 64 Sites 19,40 IM-CIuur�. Suncv 3 l-li.{1J11 VI FiI. IiAJ 4,l"� }:31i) y`„'JL.i1 15 31 Site, hlvolior� `LI1.%in d Ha111111alt i& I-Otlti I -)SI :Archaenlo,-,ik-al S h1l,LV 2rr 20 site 4 l-lammatt et a1" 19862tl ArchaeologicaJ Survey 21 Sites & Excavations Al-cliaeological Data Haun &]- Henry 2001 1 _S9 1 Site RLµcovcr�, AA A rc 1};}ci5k4illll.;ll �. L,�c +tr 'tt1 ; �+ iJskwnt��r�. urvi 1 9h? v S;Icw Arc hacirlogical SI)o;o 0 6 Rock Walls,' .9 Kl:to+111Ila iasance Sttr�cv HaMllltatt I 979 Archaeological Survev 22 3 Sites ' Hamr{tatt I9?`)c Archaeological Survq 23 39 Sites `! Conolly & OIIIH106 Archaculugic{ I �{S.� {� 80 Sites 197 1) Reconnaissance SurvcV 10 I l.ii}1r113tt 1479a Archaeological. 7" 11 Sites Ifn1 c nto ` Sun-ek' 1€i I'l:�lttilnatt 1984,± Arcbmr oingica] Survey 103S8Sites.L Excavation I I Nelson et a1" 205 Arch aco[o ie 31 28 t'? Sites Inventory Survey Archaeological 12 Rosendhal 19-S 1 Site lei connaissance Survey I (7 Project Number Reference i ype of Study .Area in Acres Results (Figure 9) 12 Sochren 1980a rblC'E1 acological lira 7 Sites Reconnaissance Sura"cv 12 Woltorth et al- 2000 Arcl7,lcolrl ical 9 7 Sites 113v miur SLLL'tiCV 13 Barrel -1 14Q5 fVchacolugical 17 _� r SL'4'sral alb. RLL-1711L1•`LI�'tik]11CC SLLI k 41 1170t411�'1� ArcIlaculogica1 12 (104 Features, 1:3 Hatin & Htmry 20t}{} 1� R? ofWrbich Were [Its°cllttlr� 5u1 tcv Agricultural) 14 Rnscndahl 1989 Alrhac010gik! ai Field E, `4loditied tfl7 ection Oulcli7, s 15 Schilt 1994 Atvhatological Study 17 1-14 Sites 16 'w ulkcr & Ruwac ahl 104 67 Sites 1998 Rcrooniaissancc Survey 16 Graves & Goodrellu,6k AivIiacvlo-1val Data Ii} x Its 1993 peso's]', Maly & Rosendahl .Ar-hacological 16 2006 Preserwanon Plall 104 67 Siw% 17 Hawiattaatt et al, 1992 Arc11n,1 of tical Survey 174 71 Sites 8 Sc�cltreli 1911(}b Archaeologicall 16 l Site Reconnaissance SurV Archaeological 19 Rechtman 20 InventOTY Survey ] .00IN 2 Sites N Rosendahl1989 'Archacvlogical 17 17 Sites. [Wc ollnaul sallce Sum's 20 Falter & Grave 1993 Arehacuk.,-,]w;: l 17 17 sites lnvcnlor� )4I1 -%CS 1 Sita. (' 149 21 Dircics ct a]. 201:x Arehac'ulcltirul 10-260 HIsttrri.e to [JIV011{n-} tiu]'%�y,Modem Farming Fe�L tures } 22 C)esilcts et a1. 20()4 Archaeological g 1 l I Ilonle+teacl InventorySurveyI'calures .7 23 Rechttnan 2013 29 ?4 Sites Clark & Rechtman Archaeological -1 6 historic Era r4 2006 Invetlto sull-ey Sites -1tt11 ici?lc}��ii al 22 Prc-C oiltael '> Escott & Escott 20I.[1 Inwiltory Survcy and historic Era Sites 11rc-Contact Anhaeo[ogiL�al and historic Era 26 Escott & Escott 2020 Survey lil�enl,Ot�'Survey 73.122 Sites I Iodated Find (Petrogly ll) 17 (Kealakekkia Quad. 1-M.:i}la'. Data Sources: Nat onttl Geographic Society. [iSCS). 18 REGIONAL PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES 1. Landrum et al. 1990, and Calls et al. 2004. P14111, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory survey (Landrum et al. 1990) and SCS, Inc. conducted data recovery investigations (Calis et al. 2004) at the Kahakai development project. The project area is located within the lower elevations of puapua'a 2`1 Ahupua`a_ Pre -Contact era to early post -Contact era cave shelters, agricultural rock clearing mounds, burials, shrines, and a. passible heiau were identified during the AIS study. A heiau complex, several burials, and five pci-mancnt habitation sites were recommended for preservation. All of the preservatioli sitcs are near the coast. 2. Carleson and Rasendahl 1990. PH RI, Inc. conducted an archaeological inventory survey of 65 acres between Kuakini and Queen Ka`aliumanu highways in Puapua°a 2°a Ahupua`a_ Their study recorded 64 archaeological sites including pre -C oritact era habitation, agricultural, and burial sites. Seven sites were assessed as significant and recommended for preservation (Carleson and Rasendahl 1990: 34). 3. Haim cit al. 1998. PHM. laic. conducted an archaeological inventory survey of the propos cd Alii Drive corridor through several ahupua`a. Numerous pre -Contact era site complexes were recorded in Puapua`a 2"`' and HMualoa V ihrorigh 4`h Ahupua'a, The site complexes included a large number of agricultural f•' aturew, as well as habitation, burial, and ceremonial features, 4. Hanimatt :roil Hill: 19111, and Hammatt et al- 1986..Two archaeological surveys were conducted osi a 20 -acre parcel of below KuakirYi Highway. The first study recorded 20 sires, and [lie second recorded 21 sites. None of the sites were recommended for preservation Marnmatt and Talk 1981: ii, and iHammatt et al. 1986: 87), The report also recommended that the single documented burial be relocated. 5. Haunt & Henr4, 2001. Haun and Associates conducted an archaeological data recovery study tit a c -shaped enclosure located on 1.59 acres of land below (ween Ka'ahumanu Highway 6. Escott 2013..SCS c onduc tcd an archaeological study on 1.962 acres of land near the intersection of Kuakini and Queen Ka'ahumanu highways. Two historic era ranch walls were recorded duri ng the study. 19 7. Sinoto 1979. Aki 5inuto recorded several Historic era ranch rock walls on a six acre parcel ofIand just mauka of Alii Drive. S. Hammatt 1979tH. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 22 acres just south of Kuakini Highway. Three archaeological sites were recorded during the study. Mone of the sites were recommended for preservation (Harnmatt 1979b. ii, and 10). 9. 1lammatt 1979c. The Archacological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 23 acres located in the near coastal portion of H61ualea l" and 2"' Ahupua`a_ Thirty nine archaeological sites were recorded during the study, The report recomrinanded that all burials. including a known cemetery site be relocated ( I{ydnnnnatt 1979a: 5). None of the rcniaining sites (pre -Contact era habitation and agriculture sites) were reconiinended for preservation in place. 10. Conally and Gunness 1979, and Flammalt 1979a and 1984. The Archaeological Research Center, Inc. conducted an archaeological survey of 103 acres within the near coastal portions of H8lualoa I" through 4"' Ahupua'a. (Hammatt 1980)_ One hundred and thirty six archaeological situs were recorded on the project area. They included pre - Contact era habitation, agriculture. burial. and a ceremonial sites. The Hamman report recommended that a beiau (Site 6661) was sigtnificant and should be preserved in place (Hanninatt 19M 4). The report also reconnmended that the single documented burial be relocated to the perimeter of heiau (Site 6661) and preserved. No other sites were recommended for preservation. 11. Nelson et al. 2005. An archaeological inventory survey was condU ted by Rechtrnan Consulting on 28.4 acres located in the Hear coastal portion of Mlualoa 2"" Ahupua`a. A total of 22 sites containing 150 features were recorded. The sites were primarily pre - Contact era agricultural and habitation sites, though five burial sites, a possible Mau, and a trail were also documented within the project area, 12. Rosendahl 1978, Soehren 1980a, Wolforth et al. 2000. PHRI conducted an archaeological inventory survey of eight acres of coastal Holualoa 3`1 Ahupua'a and recorded seven archaeological sites including three Historic era rock xalls, thrt: residential sites, and l-likapaia Heia€t. 13. Barrera 1995, Haun & Renry 2001). Barrena (1995) recorded a possible burial platfori.-n, two habluiicin site, agricultural rock clearing mounds and modified outcrops during a rewtinaissance stavey of 17 acres in near coastal 1461ualoa 2"`' Ahupua`a. Haunt and Associatcs conducted an archaeological inventory surrey of the property and recorded 12 sites with 104 features (Haun and Henry 2000:14). The majority of features (n=82) were pre -Contact era agricultural rock clearing mounds. Eleven permanent habitation and one temporary habitation feature were also recorded during the study. 14. Rusendahl 1989. PHRl conductc d an archaeological field inspection of 6.0 acres of land just below Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway in H51ualoa 2°a Ahupua`a Several modified outemps were recorded in the letter report. There were no other archaeological features identified on the project area. 1S. Sehilt 1984. The Bishop Museum c:undrleted an archaeological hturly ol'the Kuakini Highway Realignment Project located roughly along present day Queen Ka-ahurrianu HIghway and recorded 39 sites PLiapua'a 2"d and Holualoa I' and 2 n AIUI[)U�i'a. Twenty two of the sites were pre -Contact to early past -Contact era agricultural gardens and modified outcrops (rock clearing). There were also traditional habitation platforms and trails, a,� well as Histone era roads and walls rccorded dtcriitg the sftidy, 16. Walker and Rosendahl 1988, Graves and Goodfellow 1993, and Maly and Rosendahl 2006. An archaeological rcconctaissancc slirVcy (Walker and Rosendahl 1988), an archaeological data recovery study (Graves and Goodfellow 1993), and an archaeological preservation plan (Maly and Rosendahl 2006) were conducted by ?I] R1. Inc. for 104 acres in the upland region of Puapua'a 2" Ahupua'a- A total of b7 sites were documented within the project area, including traditional (KFS) sites, temporary habitation sites, three burials, and a heiew. The archaeological preservation plan recommended that the three burials be relocated to the heiau site, and that the heiuu be preserved as a formal historic preservation area (Maly and Rosendahl 2006). 1.7. Hammalt et al. 1992. An archaeoloical survey was conducted by Cultural Starr eys Hawaii on 174 acres of land in the upland region ofHblualoa I"', 2'd, and 3"1 AhuPeIa-a. The prOjecat area lands had been heavily bulldozed during; the modern era l -,or ranching; and agricultural purposes, Despite the bulldozing. seventy one sites were recorded during the study, irlclutlirtg temporary habitation features, ruck walls, agricultural features, and 21 three burial Sites. Many of the sites were determined to be associalecl with Historic era ranching and agriculture. 18. Soehren 19800. Soehren conducted an archaeological reconnaissance survey of 16.0 acres above (ween lCa`ahumanu Highway in the inland region of H61ualoa V4 Ahupua`a (Soehren 1980b). A single enclosure was identified during the survey. 19. Rechtman 2006. An archaeological I'M'e3310ry surVcy was conducted by Rechtman C0115ct1611g. I..1:.0 on a roughly carte -acre parcel located makui of ween Ka'ahumanu Highway in H&Iualoa 2'd Ahupua`a. 'Two rock wails were recorded on the project area. The report recommended no further work A the wall sites. 20. M. Rosendahl 1488, Fager & Graves 1993. Fater and Graves (1993) coaductc:d an archaeological inventory survey of 17.0 acres just mauka of Queen Ka`ahuirtanu Highway in HOIaaloa P Ahupua`a. Seventeen sites containing 27 pre -Contact to early post -Contact era agricultural features, including rock mounds, modified outcrops, C- shaped enclosures, terraces, walls, and rock enclosures, were recorded. 21. Dircks et al. 2013, Rechtman Consultirng, conducted an archaeological inventory survey of 10.266 acres of land located between 840 and 920 ft amyl in H61ualoa ]"and 2`d Ahupua'a. One Historic era to modern era homcstead/agrictrlture site ( iyose Farttl) containing 149 #calures was recorded during tliQ wur� cy. 22. Desilets et al. 2004. Destlets et al. (2004) conducted aro archaeological inventory survey of 11.7 acres of land in the "apa a region ofHolualoa I" Ahupua`a_ A single site associated with Historic era and modern era homesteads, commercial agriculture (coffee), and ranching was recorded. Features included rock walls, roads, coffee terraces, and buildings. 23. Rechtman 2013. Rechiman Con suItin L, conducted and archaeological inventory survey of 29 acres of lend Iocated in the "ci7rcr'u rction of H61ualoa I" Ahitpua`a, Twenty four sites were recorded. The majority of the sites were associated kvitli Historic era and iinod m era homesteads, commercial ai-icultur+e. Features irtcltttle.d rock walls, roads, and remnants of'structures. A single pre -Contact era to early poli -C onract cra residential and agricultural site was also recorded. 22 24. Clark & Rechtman 2006. Rec;lttman Consultin-' c011drrcted ars archaeological inventory survey of 2.7 acres ofland located in the `JI)a'a regi on ofIIaluarlQa I" All upua`a_ Six sites were recorded, ineIuding dive ranch walls and an area of coffee terraces. A number of conclusions can be made from the previous archaeological studies. A primary conclusion is that the majority of habitation features, especially permanent habitation i'eatures, are located from the coast to about 360 h amsl, below the present day Queen Ka'ahumanu highway, The same is true of ceremonial features, burials. and, to a lesser extent, agricultural features. The density of agricultural features and habitabon features, mostly temporary habitation features, in the upland regions between 360 A ams] and 700 0 amyl is much IOWer than the site density in the coastal kola and lower kahr `idaa regions of the. KFS. The pre -Contact traditional Hawaiian settlement and agricultural patterns are strongly oriented to the kola and lower kaki `talar regions. Even though cattle ranching and commercial ;agriculture may have removed some archaeological sites from the ground surface in the kalu'idu region, there appear to be fewer sites than at lower elevations. The majority of sites in the kola )du region are KFS agricultural sites including rock ck ailrg, mminds, 1110ciif1ctl OLItcrops, gardcn c closures, and low garden walls. Within the lands of the current Project, it is clear thin ranching and commercial agricultural practices have rernovecl and damaged nlariy of the }arc -C 'iMac# ira sitcs from [lie gramid surface [see the llaninlatt c9 al. 199; '�ur11ntary belm' ). Moreover, many of the sites identified near the current project area are associated with Historic era ranching* and commercial agriculture. A second conclusion is that the establishment of Historic era homesteads, ranches, and commcrcial agriculture seems to have removed. or obscured, 111c majority of pre - Contact era sites in the upper kcrlu `uhi and lower Wl)a `a regions. lr might he that pre - Contact uses in these regions did not involve the construction of large or permanent r',:,i r s, as to the lower regions of Kona. It is also likely that Historic era ranching and cominercial agriculture in the lower `dpa n region have caused large scale land alterations through the use of bulldozers for pasture and garden. It is possible that traditional features were disassembled to build rock walls and coffee terraces. 23 CURRENT PROJECT AREA SPECIFIC PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGY 26. Rarnmatt et al. 1492. Lands of the current AIS study were subject to an AIS Study conducted by flammatt et al. (1990. That study encompassed 66.039 acres of land Nvithin the current project area located between 32+0 to 690 feet (98 to 210 meters) amyl [TM ]k: (3) 7-6-021:016 and 017] (see Figore 9. Project #17). "Che current project area is located within the northern portion of'the i larimatt et al, (1992) project arca. Twenty one archaeological sites and two areas of bulldozed modern planting "terraces" were recorded in the AIS report (Figure 10 and Table 3). Eight of the 21 archaeological sites (SIHP 950-10-37-10015, #50-10-37-10017, #50-10-37-10018, #50- 10-37-10020, #50-10-37-1003 1, #50-10-37-10033, 950-10-37-10034, and ##50-10-37- 10049, hereafter abbreviated to the last Five digits) were recorded by C5H in tabular format only. Written descriptions of the remaining 13 siteare in the CSH AIS rcpert. Excavations were conducted at ten of the 13 sites. The AIS report included plan view ligures for four of the 13 sites. At the request of SHPD, additional site documentation for Sites 10011, 10012, 10031, 10049, and 10071 was submitted to SHPD in a letter report (Hammatt and Shideler 2007). Six of the sites were determined to be pre -Contact era, four associated with habitation, one with agriculture. and one single feattire Site (Site 10012) contained two burials. Fifteen of the sites were determined to be Historic era, sites, the majority associated with coffee agriculture and cattle ranching. T".o Historic era habitation sites were also documented in the AIS study. The burials at Site 10012 were removed and reinterred off-praiect prior to 1983. The site was further excavated to ensure that all iwl had been removed. The site was then back-filled and leveled by bulldozer. The AIS recotniii ended no furtlie r work at all 21 sites documented in the current project area. The Hammatt and ShIdeler (2007) letter report repeated the AIS recotnmendadon that "all surface sites int the area were doeuntenred" in the AIS report and that "s' if materi twnM. k .,- - s KJE 3 w i'N �.I I dl 4Ki A4y' I SIA III rl 1, %R) Id 11EdY:� ' 0�� s ,l,utiRii*04.P1AI+PM glhil3 . a F,_ D nl r lixu}. el •[ik � aali lk:til. 111..i'4l.Rl p4 r H.{I1 N1)4 SII }, III RM rM'h ,%IIIFclrr•1f INfR > I' �I I Y MI#Y lA 1L.Lk f IF` ;ry14 el 4A Um 141 L104! DWI4 r'li€s i} "4111 tilk lJY7�+171�IM1 �� 09 PI ..� •� � yam/ .r. 1�614q K1!1'Ii Hitll{'I kWh ' �' E3 1%rl- /rt C4 T IIN17"1 g �� t71MYlllwl t1. Figure to7 S -N- inute Series USGS T°opogn, phis Map Showing Location of Northern Portion of lfammatt et al. (1492) Sites and Current Projeer Area (ESDI, 2011 _ Sources Nat loml Geographic Society, USG 9- Kealakekua Quadrangle)_ 25 'fable 3: 1nvenlc1rk 5I' PreV13U&ly kicCOvcled ArchAcolooint Sher 4 Fhown3ll ct al_ 1992: I-Lanimatt and Shideler 2007}_ SIHP # E' 11 xrt I: TYPE FUNCTION AGE FWAVATION CUIJURAL. MAT F,'RIAL 101"11 1 '1 1'latfnrn: Ag, Clearing Pm+istwic t•S m tong trezach 3 cowrie shells l(io1 Ill l'1attti1rm k %� all Burial Pmilstoric Laire Feature Donal teinterreal off -project III)l I 1 1.nk:josilrc &- Lava Tubc Hahitation Prchisnie 4.5 rnsquare total Firr t<HtLIR.-S & Prr~hiswric,iriiJac l,, IolI1 � I. Tice Road Bed Hi tcuic 1rkI11 - 1 Platform [ zliik i{.Irnp Hi Lioric 10111 x 1 r} L-nslostire ll -,[1'i i1iQrl ISIyIIIr;t' iftlll �� t 4 (r kOCIC M CPHIld'S A.,,. Ocaring lil,1011C 1.0 111 %4 rtIC tICnch .s Metal File IStll�(1 14 E'la,nl nr• Ag. Clearing lil,lnr,w' I." I I fI 1.114I:,k.lrl' L4 ;111 1' riculter€ Hi -'401 IC 1Ally: 1 PItll'_ttll Ccnyip ."Aiy HkIL11'it I.fll.l I..' I'lat#nrn7 tu..Oearin~ Iii4,,,r1L I,Iluu _ (, rltY}tre; V11:"IwO lil,!mm I tiitl(r7 212 Terrace, l .1hi1. ioll l'r h I,Ii r:,. fl \ I .I Ill 1', ; k •i tijn.-14 atniouni sof midden & lire feature I011(r;t ')33 f:nclniure IIijbi,.,1i"II PrL�Jl,wt, I ri.. I1_` \ Ii_'; iY. ;nuk onlciunt ❑fmiddclt 1( 061) _';4 kicKlifii,t li l t l r't. I'laf tform 11.1141r.t1011 Iii s Irlt 0., X 0,5 171 i ni 171:111 awount ofa itiLlen 101170 235 U -Shaer E ricErlsurc Agriculture Historic 1.0 X 0.5 m No 3rtifnts I SIt17 1 231-, Ptatfilml Habilation Prehistoric 10072 2 3 x Waffled F LIff 4b. Clearing Hi-tnric 7.D m square t-owI No arts 5nialI amm int of N1 in Tl.i-2 10073 219 Platforms Rarnchi%Ag. IListnriC 10074 ISalli- 240 '4'1 Enclosure Enclosure Coffec Work Shed Pig Pen HiAu6c Hivaric 1.251 m squarc total 1 VG, little MS. hisirnic airtifaeta 26 In a lettcr to the County ofHawai`i Department of Planning dated July 30, 2018, (Log- No. 2018.0O878 Doc. No. 18O7SNO1), SI°1PD requested a new pedestrian survey to identify all archaeological historic properties present on the project area, and to update previous archaeolohlical documentation to include site: plans for each site with site boundaries and areas impacted by bulldozing,, pliotographs of all sites and features, an assessment of their integrity. and site signtlicance. 25. Escott & Escott 2018. SCS conducted an archaeological inventory survey on a 5.01 - acre portion of Parcel 017 in the SML[hc:ast portion cif the current project area (Escott and E,wott 2018) and recorded tweniy-two ncw�' archaeological sites within the project arca (Table 4 and Figure 11). Fifteen of the sites are single -feature sites. The remaining seven agricultural sites contained two to seven features_ A majority of the sites are agricultural terraces and complexes dating to the pre -Contact era to the Historic. era. The agricultural complexes are located in the lower teener 'uhi zone, between 600 and 7O0 feet 4182 to 213 incters) arnsl. Three of the ranch walls (Site 30595, 30601. and 3065) are the primary dividers of the five -acre project area. These Historic era walls have typical characteristics of ranch walls including cobble care till and bi-faced inward sloping walls toward the top. They are approximately 1.0 meter tall. Site 30602 and Site 30603 are Historic era ranching and agricultural enclosures constructed along wall Site 30595 and wall Site 306O1. These two wall sites are constructed into the west edge of the Site 30592 railroad berm and post-date the railroad berm. The northern third of the project area only has two sites (Site 301591 and 30956). Site 30591 its an agricultural complex with six terraces. Portions of the sites were bulldozed in the early Modern era. Bath sites date to pre-Coniact to early Historic era. The terraces reflect Kona Field System features but etre roughly constructed that more closely resemble Historic era cornntercial agriculture. Site 3+0956 is a rectangular Historic style hearth. The middle one third of the project area between wall sites 30595 and 30605 is within the bulldozed "terraces" portion of the project area- Site 30593 is a pre -Contact era to early past -Contact era lava tube burial. The burial will be preserved in place in accordance with a Burial Site Component of a Preservation Plan. Site 30594 is an 27 agricultural terrace complex that resembles the Kona Field Systern but is more roughly constructed. Artifacts recovered from subsurface testing at Site 30604 suggest it is a Historic era agricultural teiTace. The southern third of the project arca, south of wall Site 30605, contained six primarily agricultural sites (Site 30598, 30600, 30606, 30607, 30610, and 30611) and four Historic era sites (Site 30599, 34608, 30609, and 30612) with functions other than agriculture. The agricultural features included rock walls (Site 30598 and306O6), terraces (Site 30600 and 30610), and ag6cultural complexes with terraces (Site 34607 and 30610). The non-agrieultut^al features included three c,nclos4ares (Site 30599, 30608. and 30609), and a refuse Ali -,poral area Liva blister (Site 30612). The cluster of these sites indicates their use for 1 listoric crit eOMfficrw ial agriculturc. Twenty-nine shovel probes and two excavation units tested the sites. Marine shell fragments. a bagah flake and volcanic -glass flakes recovered during testing indicatc that Hawaiians likely used the area for limited agricultural purposes. However, the agricultural terraces more closely resemble the rcmains of Historic era cotrmercial agriculture. All 22 sites identified daring the current AIS study were assessed significant ander criterion "d,_ as tlicy are likely to yield information important to history. The railroad berm is also significant under criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our hislory and it embodies distinctive characteristics of the type, period, and method of railroad beef construction. The railroad berm was recommended forpreservation with preservation measures outlined in an archaeological preservation plan (Escott and Mello 2019b). The rest of the sites require no further work. I -he burial is also significant under criterion "e" as it has important value to Hawaiian people and people of other ethnic backgrounds in the state. The burial was recommended for preservation in place with preservation treatments outlined in a Burial Site Component of a Preservation Plan (Escott and Mello 2019a). 28 I a b I e- 4: Imoniory oFArchiaeolagicai Sitc-, Identified on I hc A IS I I ro joc I Jkj-e-a JE-scoll and E-scott20 IS - Site Sk Type FQatumw Wir Function Age Tenting Agricultural Complex 6 AvIlcululn: Pre-c'unlao I) Hisfi)[ic I I'l, 30502 IUIroad IkJ and 13crim 1 Transfk)riatic,ii Historic Enj 30593 Lina Tabc Burial Burial Pru-Cfxuact lo Earp P()11 3U94 A-linculturol(.Esril7i.k „ Agricu[(uri! Pm-CO11t2c11L) I li'Mill: I 'J P - I & 30595 Rock Wall I RamAiing Himoric Em 1006 I. IV�Lvi fi s Fkwd 1'I'V11or,111011 I I i swr Ic Lrw 3059' Rock 1%`LIII 1 Rmiching Ifistaric Era 3flf'M 30591) Ruck Wall t3laffj51,111 & Fnc1()"mr,! 2 Agriculilire Rayicfiirig Ri aehinVAg1'1CUItLJr;,. Fre-Ccmtact to Hi5k)ric Era Histaric Era S[3_1 & 2. TLJ1- 1 30600 Terrace I Agriculture Historic Era 5P-1 M(YO! Rock W:1fl I Rmiching Ritilo6c Em hick"arc I Rznchirq�Agriculture Ristaric Era 3 &- 4 30M1', —TW -4 1 whmrc ' -,ornplex 4 4 Ranch i i *Agriculture Agriculture Historic Era pre-coluact 40 Hislodc Bru I &, 30605 R(lk:k Wall I Ruiching-A,nicultUTC Historic Era 30606 3060" RmA A r riculturai C ompl,: I 7 Koiwhm�rAgjicLjI1wL. AffiCUItUrC Prc-Com act I o, I iistoric Erki Pm-Coiitmt to Historic Era SP- I to SP -10 30(-Aj, 30 01) J tteltystnrs I SmICIUTt Historic Em Fmclosum I 4lrucum2 Hi`,mric Fra 30610 Temce I Agi iculture Pre-corktllcL to Hisunic Em 5P-1 10611 \!,ricultural Complex Lava Blister 3 I Agriculture Refuse DwW lrt-CumRCL 10 Historic FM I Historic Era &P -I, 2. A 30612 29 —NKRb "I I F` S FT 1- sl;p591 qvm F r of I k 3116s ■ %I FF 34*" KEY PROJECT %R1FA * - I'rF SITE 0011-NDAR1' WAILROAD BPI)1 ROCK WA 1A rti {1 :tl ili Iris Yat eIF: I F:F4� til 11: 305114 1.� w I i F I]d1AA "Fri 311ni_' ITF Nkmil III ]44111 til1l �IVSRH wll� ,�VFhlI f F ylk,i. S1 k' "W"a f - Figure 11: 7.5 -Minute Series U'SUS Topographic Map Showing? Locations of Escutt and Escott (201.8) AIS Project Area Archaeological Sites (ESR1, 2011, Sources: National C.ieognaphic Society, USGS. Kealakelcua Quadrangle). 30 26. Eseott & Escott 2020. SCS conducted an archaeological inventory Survey Ott a 73,122 -acre portion cif the current project area in. Parcel 016, 017 (loon), 018, quid 019 to idemify all archaeological historic properties present on the project area, and to update previous archaeoloLlical documentation (see Figure 10). Seventeen of the twenty-one sites previously identified in Hammatt et al. (1992) were located during the course of the archaeological inventory surrey study (Figure 10 and Table 5). Two of the previously documented sites (Site 10020 and Site 10034) relocated by SCS are natural bedrock outcrops and one site former burial site (Site 10012), The burials at Site 10012 were reinterred off -project in 198:x_ The four remaining previously documented sites (Sites 10017, 10033, 117[)49. and 1007 1) were bulldozed prior to the SCS fieldwork and the remains of the sites rare no lon,:Tr present on the ground surface. Three previously undocumented sites were also recorded, including a portion of the railroad herr (Site 30592). a small coffee shed enclosure (Site 31181). and several ranch walls (Site 31152). A single petroglyph on a loose cobble was recorded as Isolated Find I (IF -1). A total of21 sites, 17 previously docimictlted and four newly doeutnettted, were identified on the Project area and are documented in this report. Tv%,o ofthe sites (Site 1.0020 and Siic 100,14) werc determined to be natural geological features. Six of the sites were detennine+d to lac pi -c -Contact era, three associated with habitation, one with agriculture, a single petroglyph site, and one single feature site (Site 10012) formerly contained two burials. Twelve of the sites were determined to be Historic era sites, the majority associated with colf'ee agriculture and cattle ranching. Two Historic era habitation sites were also documented in the AIS study. One site r Site 100 15) was determined to be a short segment of modern bulldozer road. The burials at Site 10012 were removed and reinterred off -project prior to 1983. The site was further excavated to ensure that all irW had been removed. The site was then back -tilled and leveled by bulldozer, 31 Table 5: Inventory of Escott & Escott (2020) Archaeological Situ. S I H L'# TYPE FUNCTION AGE 111111 l I'lattorm Ag, 0earine Pre-conlael 111+1k2 111alromi& wall 13tirial PrL-Contact 1170k3 farclnsurc& L:ivwi TiLhe Ilabil lion Pro -Contact. 10015 Bullduict Road '1 ral1tsl)Q3'L11LQ11 tvlo&m 11101' Platform f:,.11Ik Rnmr3 Nigtoric 100 Enclosure A rICTLkLir`dl Historic 1111119 6 Rock Mounds A (-l--1ting TIistn6c 10070 Bcdrock OutuLop €icol€ gical Fcaturr Nalund 10031 Enclosurc Wn[r AS -1 if'UlluJ_Q IIisroric 10033 Planting € oiri rlcx Collin: rpt? Historic 10034 BedriKk Ourcrop € nplou,ical, Fcature Naturul 10049 Terraces Ag>ziculture I I i storic 10067 Terraces I TablTlfion Pre -C olrtacr 10068 E nclosttr4r Habiwtiuet PIU-CUILUCI Ili1)f3L1 -Modified EilufflPla form Itab kation IIistoric 111070 L -Shape Enclosure Agricukkir` historic 1111)? I I'latfoun Habisation Pre-Cmliaet 1(11)73 Complex Ar. Cletrin- 47 111'e -Contact 101173 PlalfonUs it' 1W74 Ell-Clo;um Cotiee Wnrk Shcd Historic. 10075 Eni OiLITV Pi, I'etl Historiic 30392 Ruitmad 13crm '1`nu sporl.ut;ALL HiSLOtiC 31 ]711 Enclosure Ceficc Work Shcd III"toric 31182 Rack Walls Rawhing & Ani I11stulLC 1F-1 Potroglyph Marker I'ri-Cinitart 32 AIS SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS All sites identified during the Escott and Fscott (201 S) and Escott and Escott (2020) AIS studies were assessed as significant under criterion "d -as they are likely to YICld 111fo ration important to llistorv. The railroad ber-n is also significaw. minder criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history and it embodies distinctive characteristics of the type, period, and D11:00d of railroad bed construction. The railroad berm was recommended for preservation. The petroglyph (IF -1) is recommended for preservation in a afe location on the project area, preferably within the Site 30592 railroad berm prescr� ation. area. Burial Site 30593 is also significant under criterion "e" as it has important value to Hawaiian people and people of other ethnic backgrounds in the state. The burial is recommended for preservation in place with preservation treatments outlined in the SHED -approved burial site component of burial treatment plan (Escott and Mello 2019). The remaining sites are recommended for no further work. Site 30592 is summarized below from Escott laid Fscott (1-1118.53-54), 33 SITE 30592 RAILROAD BERM. FUNCTION: Transporta ion AGE: }-Historic Fara. DIMENSIONS: 300.0 m long (N/S) by 4.0 m wide max. by 5.0 m max. height CONDITION: Good INTEGRITY: Unaltered: retains integrity of location, setting, materials, and workmanship SL;RFACE ARTIFACTS. ModernTrash Debris EXCAVATION: None DESCRIPTION: Site 30592 is an Historic era railroad herrn located bet -ween 680 m and 690 in ams] along the eastern boundary of the project area (see Figure 8). The railroad berm is approximately 300.0 m in length (SE/NW) and 4.0 m wide by a maximum of 5.0 m in height. The railroad bed is a level dirt and rock surl'ace, and the berm is located along the west side of tlrc railroad bed. The southern portion of the berm retaining wall is constructed of small boulders and large cobbles stacked up to nine courses high (Figure 9 and Figure 10). The berm is well faced with fairly tightly fitted natural rack. The rock has trot been worked prior to stacking. The berm face slopes slightly toward the east as it approaches the tap to prevent collapse. The southern portion of the railroad tied top surface has been bulldozed in the fairly recent past, likely during construction of the homes along the east edge of the project area property. portions of the berm are partially collapsed. There is a fair amount of modem construction debris and refuse along the southern course of the railroad iced. The northern portion of the railroad berm retaining wall is constructed o f small boulders and large cobbles stacked up to nine courses high (Figure 12 and Figure 13). The berth is well faced with. fairly tightly fitted natural rock. The rock has not been worked prior to stacking. ne perm face slopes slightly toward the cast at it approaches the top to prevent collapse. 34 Figure L?: Photogral-ph of Site 34592 RRmIroad Bonn Rail Bed, Leaking South {25 cln scale) 35 401 The retaining wall is approximately 5.0 m high and is construcled of fifteen courses of large basalt cobbles and small boulders. The north encs of the berm has been bulldozed roughly 60.0 m south of the nonhea.st corner of the project area. Site 30592 appears to be unaltered and is in goad condition. Only the north end of the railroad berm has been altered by bulldozing;. Site 30592 will be preserved render significance Criteria a, c, and d. SI'T'ES #50-10-37--10592 PRESERVATION TREATMENTS The former Kona Sugar C"ompariy railroad bed and berm (Site 30592) is a long linear feature extending across the eastern boundary of Parcel 016 and Parcel 017. Preservation at Site 30592 consists of avoidance and protection (conservation) per HAR §13-277-3(1). The majority of the feature will be preserved with the proviso that it may be breached for purposes of access. Short -Term Preservation Measures In the event of land disturbance or construction in the area of Site 30592 using heavy eart.hmovin,g equipment, a butTer will be established at twenty feet from the western perimeter of the railroad berm (Figure 1.4 and Figure 15). The twenty -foot buffer will be clearly marked with orange fencing. Any construction warp using earthmoving equipment in close proximity to the twcuty-font butler will require the presettce of an ambacological monitor. No c:ons"coon will take place between the railroad berm and the costern property boundary. Any construction within 30 feet of the railroad bed and b rni ,hall be monitored by a qualified archaeologist familiar with Site 30592 and previous archaeological studies evndcrctecl on the property. Long -Terns Preservation Measures A permanent preservation buffer will be established twenty feet from the western perimeter of Site 30592 (see Figure 14 and Figure 15). Native ornamental plants tray be used to7 mark the twenty -foot preservation buffer. No use ofhcavy earthmoving equipment will be allowed within the twenty foot buffer. Hand -tools only shall be permitted within the twenty -foot permancnt preservation buffer. Bureau of Conveyances Subsequent to final approval by SHPD of this Preservation Plan, a metes and bounds description of the burial and archaeological preservation sites, and perinanent preservation easements shall be surveyed and recorded with the State of11awai`i Bureau of Conveyances in conformance with HAR § l 3-300-38(g). The T'MK plat map will include a map of the preservation area. 37 41 ;7. 4p 14 W.511-}At1 If 101 ti J'kF Njj 11141 \l $I,% tl i'l "MI 6 Figure 14; 7.5-Minu I u Series L.;S(jSTupk),p;,it)Ijj%' 1, 1; Lj� tKI,Ouoa and Puu Po I iA,,i Ic,! or proli cc t Area. Arcllmvologjcal Sites and Preservation Easements tESRI 2013. Data Sources: N.%,, \. %t,L, it 33 A M k Wi*VAr .. rte' y I Figure 15; Poilion ofTMK: (3) 7-6-021 Map Shoring the Locations of Site 30592, Preservation and Acccss Easements, and Access Breach. 39 p1L _ KEN' PR[l.H.CTA REA 1: � i - RAILROAD BED - PRESk:RVATION EASENIENA . RRF V -II & ACC[ S% �y 5 i B y � d 1r e d•y1 �. •r µ �� M ern .. ,��•- � � f Ar de A K Wi*VAr .. rte' y I Figure 15; Poilion ofTMK: (3) 7-6-021 Map Shoring the Locations of Site 30592, Preservation and Acccss Easements, and Access Breach. 39 Property Title The details of this preservation plan and its preservation measures shall become a matter of record with the parcel title.. The descriptions of the preservation easements will be added to the title, including the specific requirements and restrictions related to physical improvements, signage. maintenance and access. Access Pedestrian access to Site 30592 shall be from 1Q Place located east of the site (see Figure 12 to Figure 1.5). Parking is available on to Place_ The property owner is responsible for ensuring the access easeinent is usalble for pedestrian travel, and is responsible for keeping the access easement clear and open. Access will be permitted seven days a week, one-half hour before sunrise to cine -half hour after sunset. Access can be arranged by calling the property owner. Signage Weather -resistant signs, approximately 18 by 24 inches in size, shall be placed at the railroad bed at the end of to Place. The signs shall read: Kona Sugar C"onrprrn.y Railroad Preserve This siic is historically signi ticlmt. Historic sites are protected LiTider state Iaw, Violation could result in a $20,000 fine. (Chapter 6E--11, Hai ai`i Revised Statutes) DLNR-SHTIT) {S08) 692-8015 Maintenance The landowner is responsible for maintenance of the presen ation easement, access path, signage, vegetation clearing, and general appearance of the preservation area. 40 Aki. H. REFERENCES CITED 1952 Map of Kailua Section, North Iona, Hawai"i, Land Titles. Survey and Map by IS. Emerson, Hawaii Tenitorry Survey Map. registered Map No. 1280. Alexander, J. 1855 Map of Hdlualoa 1& 2, Kana l lawai`i_ I lawai`i Tcrritory Survey Map, Registered Map No. 1450_ Athens, J., T. Reith, and T. Dye 2014 A paleoenvironme.ntal and arebacological model-bascd ave estimate for the colonization of Hawaii iilrt r i� crrr tlraricirrrd� , 79(�):144w5S. Barrera, W. Jr. 1971 card Srwvo� ' at Kecrarhou, North Kona. Hawaii. Bishop Musewn Deparxra enral Report Serkc v 71-I0. Submitted to Kameliarielia Development Corporation. B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Burtchard, G. C. 1995 Poparlation and Land -use on The Keauhou Coast, the 1klcaukcr Lenids Invaenion SurTivy, Kecaihau, North d otia. Hcnval 'r Alcaardl the r' arrati;w. 1?ar•l 1. Submitted to Belt, Collins and Associates and Kamehamoha Tnvcstrnr nt Corporation. l.A.RTI, Honolulu. Cordy, R. 1981 A Stud), gfPraehistoric Social Change- The Development of Complex Societies in the Hcnvaiian Islands. Academic Press, New York. 1995 Cewr•ral Kona Arcahaeaingical Settlement Patterns. Dcpartmettt of Land and Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Division, Honolulu. 2000 Exalted Sirs the Chief' Mutual Publishing, Honolulu. Dye, T. "Oil A Madel -based age estimate for Polynesian colonization of Hawaii Ar*chaeafc v in Oceania, 46:130-38. Ellis. W. 1963 Narrative qI'a Tour off aw aii, or 0whtxhee. Advertiser Publishing, Honolte k. 41. Ascott. G., and S. Escott 2018 Archaeological Iiaivrrtoty Sara7vv l?eMrr for 5.O Aca-es Locarecl irr Hr3Irraloa I'Ka Ahrrpracr'a, Nortl)Ko)taDisiriei, Hcnt-ai'i Island, Haia,ai'1 ll,WIK: (3)7-6-(}21:617 Prat. f . Prepared Cur East West Realty. SCS Deport 187 l -1, I lonolulu 2020 Archac,e)to�,'accrl lain eiitoi-i, .Srra•i e); i?e ri, f,)r 76.12I Acmes Lrxated rrr Hnhrcalrra l" Aharplra'a, North Kona Disn-iccr. Hen•vai `i Islrancl, Harvai 'f [l K: (3)7-6-021:016- 019]. Prepared for Moria Tbree. LI -C. SCS Report 2330, Honolulu. Escott, G, and N. Mello 2019 Burial Site Component of -dr Burial Treaime ar Plcan.10'r Bur4d Silo 50-10-37- 30593 Localecl in HOlriatoa I' Ahrilnra'a, 11 or rh Kona Disli-jel, Hcra+.-ar 'i lrkrrref, Hcnrai'i IT 1 : (3)r -b-021:0171. Prepared for Kana Three, LLC. SCS Report 2137, Honolulu. Google Earth 2013 Goggle Earth Imaget . Google Earth. Mountain View, Ca. Flarn1witt, H. H., and S. D. Clark 19807 Aa°c{rdtr}raTt,arc`rrlTay.stlarcratd�Salvagei�xc°er}rrrc►nstrf.alAcaeGirrter�Pdtacelirr No alarrlTrtw a P ah(Oane, I.a alna, card Kol)etla 'alaea, Kona, Hawaii Wand. ARCH Report 14-152 III. Submitted to Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. Haminatt, H.H., and W.H. Folk 1980 Ar-c•hlac>UfFigic'aI Sit rve l , Phase 1:' Por"tiotr& of Keauhou-. ona Rc>sori, Ketzuhou and 1Kahuh `rr. Kona, ffinved 'i Istatarl ARCH Report 14-177 11. 1. Submitted to Kamehaarneha Investment Corporation. Hammatt, H.H., W.H. Folk, and D.W. Shideler 1942 Ardhaeofir hwl .Sarrvev Twing anti Excavation ql'u 174 -Acre Parcel, d5oluuloa, Orth Kona, Hagvai `d. Report prepared by Cultural Surveys Hawaii for the GanxlDn Corporation. Report an rile at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Harninatt, H.H., and D.W. Shideler 2007 Letter Report Documenring Archaeolog ccal Simir Conducted. FinA and Their Trecatartent at a Proposed MulXiple-Fatnily Rc w icic caul Development, Holnalocr Ahuuct'a, Norlh Kona District, Harm `i Island l Mkt (3) 7-6-021: Ol6 por. CS Depart prepared for 12.50 Oceanside Partners, LLC, Kailua-Kana. Handy, ES, 1940 The Haw ai an Plainer, Volume L B.P. Bishop Museum bulletin 161. B.P. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu.. 42 Hattn, T. L., S. L. Collins, S. D. Clark. and A. Qi1-1 Lod 1986 Moe Kair a Ho `oiln: Haw aiicm :1Ioi-mc t -i- I'rcac tiee:s orf liec5 . K a, I1`cn� Chapter 'V"11_ Artifacts and Manuports from the Keopfi Burial Site. Bishop Museum Departmental Report Serio, 86-1. Submitted to Department of Transportation, Honolulu. Ffaun, A, E., J. D. Henry, J. A. Jimenez, M, A. Kirkenda11, K. Maly, and T. R, W01forth 1998 �11i` HighscrPlacacz�c11l9ifigcatirtrr {rrrrrrrrra I'iacrs f-.Qr•chaecrlcgr{zaT lnfertsive kSt j-w;;m, ,Summ- ar v. vol. 1. I?HR1 Report t 320-052798. Submitted to County of Hawaii`i, PHRI, Hilo. Hommon, R. J. 1986 Social. Evolution in Ancient Hawaii- In I.slrand Soc'ief es: Archaeological Approaches to f i!o trr on and Tr•arasfor ration, edited by P.V. Kirch, pp. 55-88. University Dress, Cambridge. Kahn, J., Rieth, P. Kirch, J. Athens, and. G. Murakami 2014 Re -dating of the Kuli'ou'ou rock shelter-, O'ahu. lTawai`i-.Location of the first radjocarbon date from the Pacific Islands, knit -nal of the Po1vnesican ,Socigr. 1?:3{ 11:67-90, Kelly, _ 1983.Nd }f?dh:r o Inc ia-- Gardens of Kotw, Dept. of Anthropology Report Series 83-2_ Bishop Museum. Honolulu. Kirch, F.V. 2011 When slid the Polynesians settle Hawaj'i? A re, -view of 150 years of scholarly inquiry and a tentative answer. Hawaiian Ar;chaetdogy, 12:3-26.. Kirch, P.V, and M, McCoy 2007 Reconfiguring the Hawaiian Cultural Sequence: Results of re -dating the Halawa dune site (MO -A 1-3), k1olol<a`i Island. Journal ttf the Poivneshm Socien, 116:385-406. 2007 Revised late Holocene culture history fo:r Molokai Island, Hawaii, Radiocarbon, 49(3):1273-1322. Maly. K 1.993 Ka `ao Hu'cae ina Pi `iew ai Xo K a-Mik , The Heart Stury Stony of }iia-,Viki. Published in Hawaiian, in the newspaper "K aHvlr r 0,1}1_rwcai'} (}tile) .lanuary 8, 1914.through Dcceitrbor 6, 1917. Translated by Kepi Maly for Paul H, R.owndahl. Ph.D,. Inc, 43 1996 Historical Documentary Research. In Aruhaeoha `deal iravcrwol-v Survey Proposed Henry Street Extension Road Corridor, by WLilzen, W., T. R. Wolforth, and L.J, Franklin, pp. 9-19. PRI -11 Iteport 1465-092696. Prepared for 1vMaryl Development, Kailua-Kona. PHRI, Hila. Maly, 1C_ and 0. Mali, 2002 Be ff ahi Mrs `olelo No Ka',iina A Me Nii 'Ghana 0 W aiki 'i Ala Waikblr a (KV an a 0 Waimea, Kohaid), A AJe Ka 'Aima Mauna: A Collection nf' ficrclidovs and Hi,4toricalAccounis rtf The Lands and Families of Waiki'i at Wafkploa (Wahnea Rcgion. South Kohala), eind the Moarrrfah? Lands, IFIaiid ref Haw ai `i (TMK Ovcti,It'w Sheer 6-7-01), Kumu Pond Associates. Hilo. flI Coy. M. 2005 The development of the Kalaupapa field system, Koloka` i Island, Hawaii. .Iotarnal of the Polynesian Sociefv, 1 16:339-58. �lojizies, A. 1920 llcniwi'i Nei 128 Years Agri. Edited by W.F. Wilson. New Freedom Press. Honolulu. Mulraoncy, M. SBickler, M. Allen, and T. Ladefoged -01 1 High -precision dating of colonisation and settlement in. East .Polynesia. Proceedings of fhe National Academe: ref Sciences, I08:E 197-F 194. National Geographic, Topo! 2003 Seantiless IISGS Topographic Alaps on CD-ROA1,, Htm ai'i. National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Washington, D.C. Newman, T. S. 1970 Htai aiian Fishing and F'rarnfing on the Aland of'HawaHA.D. 1778. Department of Lund and Natural Resources, Honolulu. Rieth, Timothy M.. Terry L. Bunt, Carl Lipo. and Janet M. Wllmshur:4t 2011 The 13th Century Polynesian Colonization ofHawai`w Island. Journal qf' Archaeological Science 35;2740-2.749, Pukui, M,K., S. Elbert and E. Mookini 1974 Plcace Names cafHavv aii. University of Hawaii Pres, HoitolUILI Sato, H., W. Ikeda, R Paeth, R Smythe, and M. Takehi.ro Jr. 1973 Soil Sury v of 1slatacf cif fl aivali, State of Rawaiii. United States Department of Agriculture Sail Consmation Service. Washington D.C. Schilt, R. 19134 ,.Subsistence and C utaf7ic t it; Bona, Hawvcai `i: An Archtteologicerl ShIdj, qf file Kuakini Highw v Realrgraaarew Corridor, Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Report prepared for the HawaI1 Depai-tment of Transportation. On file at the SHPD Library_ Kapolei. 44 Tomonari- oggie. M. J. 1990 Ar•chaicol rgiccal Inventory Sur-ve-v of Develofrlrrew Par cel 6 of the Kean half Res,ort, �llrrrpma a off�ahalrf'rf, North Kona, Island of Ranieri. Prepared for Belt Collins and Associates. International Archacolo,,ical Research lnslitute, Inc. Honolulu. U.S. Geological Stamey 1928 15-Min:ata Serle, Topographic Ililr; Qrrrerlvangle "012, USGS Print, Washington, DC.. URI.: hirj.} arrrr.rituvY.rls .�.go4� :plv`fraprrrrrrrps'_ '{Vancouver, G. 1967 A Voi-rrgc- ol'Discoverl- to the North Pac#;v Ocean, and Around the World. Robinson and Ldwards. London. Waihona `Aina 2014 Mahele online database, www_waihona.com. Wilkes, C. 1971 Ncar•ratim o/ the UhatedStaies Explor'hkg Expedif on Daarirrg the Yc'ar► 1938-M412. Vols. 1-5 andAtlas. Lea & Blanchard. Philadelphia. ilmhurst, J., T. Hunt, C, Lipo, and A. Anderson 201 la High -precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings o0he.ha ionalAcade}rpt.- of Sciences. 108:1815-20. 201 lb Reply to Mulrooney et al.: Accepting lower precision radiocarbon dates results in longer colonization chronologies for East Polynesia. Proceedings gf'the Mcational Acadeniv ol'Sciences. 108:E 195. Wolfe, E.W., and J. loads 1996 Geological Map of the Island of Hawai-i_ U.S.G,S. Miscellamous Investigations Series. Dopartmem of the Interior, Washington, D.G. 45 APPENDIX A: SHE'D AIS APPROVAL LETTER 46 �{li'11 �k leCil10-'.1, lK! k.irl:l-ai.lnl`ole r?�rCY[ IlaYral`L Q6'N1 Entail. ri hardca,t;aesirra!tr.Lrti ati-ji, Mr. iVlieelock: SUBJECT: Cbapter6F-'I:HisiorlrPt•€�,Ltti'ution Review - Araheal I"I lm'rnsorr' Suive} off -J] Aenp-; in I'lalualuw FIblusloa 1st Ahupus`a, North Nana DLsrrict, hlantl ofItz-ral- i TTiKs (3) 7-6-031:017 por. IN REPLY REFER TO Lug Nil, ,b 18,1) 1123 D,x_ No. I W5SNO5 Archaeology This Id Ler ptu,ides the SLLAC Hisluric Prescrvatian Division's IS13PD'sl review of 111c rer"is6d "Oil titled {rchcre'alogicuf fnivnimy Saemwl' Fepora jwr 3. f! Ae L'v Locwm hr Ndrualpna 1" . ilitrprw a. or'ilr Keina• rfarL'a7e •i fxlcn,d,, U011 -41''J J7'U : r3y i ei.eJ1 J:0? 1xr'.+ [l :nLt land L'uartl, rc6wa MILY 201,5) lkcvisionli w the 11; xWT1 rc rejuested T'in email on May 13, 2018 (Sinn Lebo [S}]PT)J to {ileltn Escott [Sewititic Umsuham'--rvjces. Inc_ 1 SC S 171 and 511P17 recei'sed 1e revised report un May 1 S. 2017 - SCS :7nnducted T.lic i 1mcalonicnl inti'cnToi3r +uIT(!V (AISI ar rhe T. QLIe%T of the Iandowlier. Korea three. LLC-. The ,Vg %vas conducted in suppurl k,.I'j t'I.u111t utI IJL%:1VI Ilei IIIiL a131IIIcalimi for propo ed de'.cIopnwni of elle property. The AIS covcreli a 5.0-ac:re portion of Lhc 3tl.yLl1-LIC% PDrLCL fir ti, lId +%'nrk incILILI%:d :3 I I?IPI„ pedcs-trian siuvev of tho entilrc TiMimi. Gta urea, uttti r°iLdhiliiy vt'a4 I�LiI III Pllilr. SU17WITI:SL Lt Lesling WA, delle LIL:ICLL AI, 4.ck'Mj rCLitures• The AIS doLtutVtsled h%12r1ty-tTv4 newly itica iScti hi,mric prupert,ius LTubhe 11. The 5iwlR include n pt- And+or early put-CoriluCL lava tube burial, pre- ivwkbr eariv post-Coiir.ici. &L-rirultural terriwrs, acrd Putit-L`unLurl x.LJls and CwIp'-LITC'.; with ngLjcullttrC Itn6'OF rllMdlin L• A10.I P;I I4';tn1acA miIrona hcrm. Table I SLLliurl:uy 01'Siies D01MViemed fit AIS :Site N50.10-37- Tom.___ tl rxT ti: h ,'x5F t%!D V. Mill p_r --- A cultural it}rn Icw N"M Yul"t lla r�Llo lyll'- IV VINN 'OnLar:L . tOW -1 . S; i v a I SII IiIL4; i 3MC)3 Lai'., l Ilht" li116:11 Illi.`• 11T Fariv I�ii4T t'i7r1[a%:I STATE OF HAWAII ' DEPARTMENT OFLAND , NFIDINATL'FLtLRFSOURCIF-S ;,;,.lwlam.:l`;nl.n„I,i 1 I�Il�-IITI'r,41-411T1r3L1 SIA1 L ILLSkOkk- PRESERNWIJUN DO. LSLUN Rock Wall KAKLUtl]LN'ABLAiJ LNU IImoric [;p 1 K,1” IOULA 13 LVD. STL 835 Possible Hearth KAruLrL HAW A13 b1h�tF� k'Iti ;I,'illx 30597 �{li'11 �k leCil10-'.1, lK! k.irl:l-ai.lnl`ole r?�rCY[ IlaYral`L Q6'N1 Entail. ri hardca,t;aesirra!tr.Lrti ati-ji, Mr. iVlieelock: SUBJECT: Cbapter6F-'I:HisiorlrPt•€�,Ltti'ution Review - Araheal I"I lm'rnsorr' Suive} off -J] Aenp-; in I'lalualuw FIblusloa 1st Ahupus`a, North Nana DLsrrict, hlantl ofItz-ral- i TTiKs (3) 7-6-031:017 por. IN REPLY REFER TO Lug Nil, ,b 18,1) 1123 D,x_ No. I W5SNO5 Archaeology This Id Ler ptu,ides the SLLAC Hisluric Prescrvatian Division's IS13PD'sl review of 111c rer"is6d "Oil titled {rchcre'alogicuf fnivnimy Saemwl' Fepora jwr 3. f! Ae L'v Locwm hr Ndrualpna 1" . ilitrprw a. or'ilr Keina• rfarL'a7e •i fxlcn,d,, U011 -41''J J7'U : r3y i ei.eJ1 J:0? 1xr'.+ [l :nLt land L'uartl, rc6wa MILY 201,5) lkcvisionli w the 11; xWT1 rc rejuested T'in email on May 13, 2018 (Sinn Lebo [S}]PT)J to {ileltn Escott [Sewititic Umsuham'--rvjces. Inc_ 1 SC S 171 and 511P17 recei'sed 1e revised report un May 1 S. 2017 - SCS :7nnducted T.lic i 1mcalonicnl inti'cnToi3r +uIT(!V (AISI ar rhe T. QLIe%T of the Iandowlier. Korea three. LLC-. The ,Vg %vas conducted in suppurl k,.I'j t'I.u111t utI IJL%:1VI Ilei IIIiL a131IIIcalimi for propo ed de'.cIopnwni of elle property. The AIS covcreli a 5.0-ac:re portion of Lhc 3tl.yLl1-LIC% PDrLCL fir ti, lId +%'nrk incILILI%:d :3 I I?IPI„ pedcs-trian siuvev of tho entilrc TiMimi. Gta urea, uttti r°iLdhiliiy vt'a4 I�LiI III Pllilr. SU17WITI:SL Lt Lesling WA, delle LIL:ICLL AI, 4.ck'Mj rCLitures• The AIS doLtutVtsled h%12r1ty-tTv4 newly itica iScti hi,mric prupert,ius LTubhe 11. The 5iwlR include n pt- And+or early put-CoriluCL lava tube burial, pre- ivwkbr eariv post-Coiir.ici. &L-rirultural terriwrs, acrd Putit-L`unLurl x.LJls and CwIp'-LITC'.; with ngLjcullttrC Itn6'OF rllMdlin L• A10.I P;I I4';tn1acA miIrona hcrm. Table I SLLliurl:uy 01'Siies D01MViemed fit AIS :Site N50.10-37- Tom.___ Funcik,n age 30491 --- A cultural it}rn Icw �,,,Twijllllre lyll'- IV VINN 'OnLar:L . 3tli,)7 Ii.'1111 1;11 alld Ekynl i i-.11lti[ (url:Lli'.SLL IiIL4; i 3MC)3 Lai'., l Ilht" li116:11 Illi.`• 11T Fariv I�ii4T t'i7r1[a%:I 3tJ5`�4 rx�plyllltll';lltlTtISITICX 'l4'+lSLIJlllll>:` I�Il�-IITI'r,41-411T1r3L1 301,95 Rock Wall Raiichin2_— IImoric 30596 Possible Hearth F,7,id PTa`}YdLahodS vii :tlrli' 30597 Ruck Wall Rauc3sin Iiis:uii: 30598 Rack Wall l:':ic ullul'i l{3tLL'lli:i« ] IL'- IV I'C'51-COntaci 301199 Platform 2k ETwlosure k:u L:: rIU : t Vl'JL7IIIIlll't I c;;'Tic 3I1fa06 Tcrrwe 4 rrullurr I.i,-.'nr mw Rotk',1`all 12:LIIti':,iu_ l_is'.Ilic [#Iho., Enclesum I{!ills•-an�� .�.:`rn:lllll�rl.�. Iti<:,In,: 1 3060.3 F.ncIkitiuTC Rullc.� in6 A ricIIItILrC Iik-,mc 47 M-. W'hcoilaock Maty31. ,.R 1 A emG -into I'mucrlma t r 1 ,- ' "L ''1 ( 1�r13 11 .}0� . Wall _ llanL.h1' _ - I'.. _ #--I'M..I 30C+t?f!' �IUc1l Will[ IIAF011' �JI Arwt#irYltal �Ex +]F:LL 1C1CV7li Ili=iielunaec UvelLe� YI>7d tie, I ��JO/{f�i,4Ay Faclueltrh 71 . .A-'_--, 1 ., . t. j!t! L ufttunl C h#i ., telt The ix Flt WM 3R10.., ; 14 .;k,n, I: r H's.tr `,' 1 3 '_>t4. �+' 6 �rFx@Lti47Fl l' • ^'t' I',Yl'f,,_ ag>7t -k-k i a9 firgrllfli'ar; m ,L,r I -°1 r .1 ,Y .I'.,I I . '. ...': �1'nl ndcd f, , .,.z r4.. Lh.1r. a. : ;1, 1 :.I I'.. 'C'`..' hanitl) YV24 a -NC- . •. 11ri;-1r1' IIvIcT :..Tr,•n. -:. n I ,.. r ,--n-1 -n _shl fi,r - .bill be oat] irv,I en tJ lnal irv,i7arl P .r• P:., - :: r : - •:a' s _091 Add i,r 3'Z�•: ,!}t...; lha•;, t� -.., s.' .; .1:C r. t , t._'•-: tr'tv!mrannn nn their spr :,-1 '. HxeeJ sm ehr pbovt Ittktaxpr i. I ill• : 1.190 ...: ,.1,:r is "e Nwt, V xptieet+l :IY�r#r! ?Hl'� Cs,�7C1YA with the silmificwwx and h a.1m,ni -,.-,:,:.rumcrdatkn, The repuet mats be rtgtA emwtt5 sptNifled m HAK The mpom Is somped, C'WW send two hrttl wpAs of Che document, ckul;.• n=ked FINAL al@W wAh a copy ai this rtmew kmea and a texc.to tnhabie FIEF 32►= to the V.406,1 SITYD UMN't. ,altrnhUtl, SFfrf : ee f ii"W, WWLAVV), As stipdmd in HAA ¢13-284-7. when SiCFiI wmfncrim shat a rmiew-c %ill rcmAt m °'t Tow with g7wd-qm rnitiysau#rn ctrttmatitracnia . thrndeatllai mlOwl,,r, lrlane <XMI be LL"c'lopPl F,r SHFV rTvic-"svxpiaraea pzar to ppoiact htitician, Tltt: WTOd ®pore mirrxmulr n wnrr miirrwnry i+Fe pf"cr-.A3in- ,aW a vhwdpgW rlplm ortog 1"1,a'slntm W HAR ¢13•284-1, SHN) Luck, furwartl to r caving n hu d Wtbawnc p'AU f.#s Stye 705431 an atchwo ILVuaC pecserratxwr pitu arecung Lh[ mqu.rrrruul% rl; : illi I t-_' 1144 Cur S: Ir 14re'01 &ad w aJClirth]#6giYYl r-1+hr,fawM *r m t =&g thr nquwamcmts of HA K $ I s : zila -'.. ,r ; 1 In '.. r.u�l': rCr-' l-;kHlR i .SH I'D Nhat1 ten1A, the (-mtwy wfta um nfrhx ha. rr�IcWcj .Yn:..-LLc;AtL' LII= .ar cel prr5t:R-AtkO tM arxl elle rrchi"110r_ku nlunitJmng ptM nut the ilh=rti pt'tsetti,J va aril I: r: Ytrrd, =tiwnt t1LCaSIm halve been iinplrm enred. mid tyle Petndt vWlicwavun hni himm reviu urecl, and 7 inns' iw, :".Lr!,:e rta4mac. FIC4,&e cklaaci Sean NI1lcttrutic aM 8ltt4l Q33-'631 ar rt crc;. ,,as a mmmm rtpr#emgt6'la lemn Al4ta, s. mat A_ Lc NIL PhD Avhdtolt#gy 3iarch chief I:cr;:c rn F:v�ra. SiS, u fij lw AM, 48 or Or LAND C() 1, 1 KT RF - A R SYS I'LM K L L I : i b� ."I Li I I I TG-. A"yn P. cu� �i,7 �,�nd (:o rr, mij n i1v 1),. 1 np iT�c, t 1. � I � Ice (- I I- z, -,L -I 19,)(" K:Ilo olL: St , Suita 102 Nd Vwk Hilo. I lawai'i 967-20 [)EBi�N. TOMONO TITLE OF DOS I.IMENT AFFORDABOYHOUSIM. A(eRITNIFN F PARTIES TO DOCUMFNT: COUNTY: M.-NTY QF HAl;-%l:%l'L :i mim1pll COCpOiAll)l is -. K I -I), r, lu ',&—ZI S LI JtEL 1;Vl , I I I I.-), I 1 96720 DEVELOPER' Koi T[ I L �: L- Ha LA ; J,I - I I I I I I I y k: u I I I u! V- 1-1 l ';sL d] t I I i FV S is 101 1-1uaIklai S trect, Hilo, H,i I L - 1 96 720 A ffects T M K (3) 7-6-021:016 and (3) 7-6-021:017 Document contains A pages. AFFORDABLE HO SING AGRLLX ENT 41? VIM 1 his Afk)rdabL Hoo g Agreement (`AAiccrnentl is maple and vt`footive this Vlh day. C,f 1-61 Y) !vM 20LI' (die "Effective Dale"). by and bctwoun KON A 'I TREE LLC:. i. 1. nv;li 1 liil itt e€,tripany, (the "Ci vOoper"). NV40, L: placti of FL 171c:'s wid m.:il:riL address in tic State of l lawai`i is 101 Hualalai Street, Hilo. 1 :awai`i 1`67'20. ar.d t'tc CUU.� l 1' OF J J; 11'M rS 1y1 municipal corporation vl the Slate of H&v-'a1 !, [tl�� t,ti'}llili4•' `,I_ `.:1 I 1 e 131'11. LAP, plaLtic c fbus1Ir, c s and mailing address is 25 Aupuni Street, i I:lo, 1-1awai`i 96720. RECITALS % H� ARFS. :Fe Pt- tie€aper proposes to develop 450 vvsidential units on a.Vr&xwlrat; E'v 08.8.kr ;rcr{=s i,;. real property located at l l t taloa, North Kona, Island, (u..V.MP,., and Sia�lc ol'Ha.iwai`i tu1'1'.-xMar ltiv fTMK's Nos, (3) 7-6-021:016 and (3) 7-6- 021;017, heye::t 41t4r c:afled tike "Ko.iia Thre.t! Pro jtct' :rind nwrt particularly described in Exhibit A atlachmi .�ie: eto and made a part o#; aTld W H EREAS, the 17evek.)tie r proposes to satisfy the Kona Three Project affordable housing requiretnertts, along with additional regriirearkenits fir Csatmlon Corp. ("Original Project Developer") through tho acquiwirion ++I-ai-fordahle housing credit`s in accordance with leawaiiiCounty (radeBeet ion 11-_,ta)(:'�: and WHFREAS, on Dcoc tri,)cr 1.3, 1483, the ti4o' I and 1.1se. Corn,mi:4sion C'MJC") of the State of Hawaii arnended the AericulturzJ Land 1. L-�t District Fioundary into the 1_irban Land Use District l3oUndery of 173.60 i1L'rL:;,,; prrtp, r#.ti, ul,icll jnC]UdMJ the Kora Three Project, subjecr to Condi Inn "A', wi ich prm-kicd for the "cl-elonn7wrtt of affordablc housing as follows: 1. Pell',Ioncr si,:.11 provide housing opportunitic:: t<: -r 1.1%v and j1� �4lL:f.�:c inns r�,c rti,�'. ntspriortoar,sign- i n7-1 ari�fi,rTiii, ft'.NrL--pf by 'tis+ak cit rnCrt�a�� or c7..as5 EVIIX-W -IS gelckrr'If:v) Its; interre.Ld. kii '.1-e L.ki171�C� 1 1Y71' Ill', 1mv i::t�'."kno, i.i)r sale. can. a pr L;vL:iLi;_I l7t ., uul iL:,,-tWn (;,ou;)UlLitiQ11 Willi 1 —Lhc:r Vf 1 olk C:iu Hav vii---]o_:,ing. Al,tllc-,r tv:.hc.' 1', 1n;y' o f 1.1ri :ai i.. ten peraenr 110%) of the Iortr housa1-.d Ini ;r, Itis_ dL-, eIo e:i or ilia .sLihject propertV, to res 1dw111s of rll; S:at.0 of am:.-- 1' 1 I t i w ant 11 .n.Icraw I'aiiiiiy incorn eas deten i i I i i :,J ')v'.3=c Ha'.vaii HL, usinS Aa.'l*::rIiry orcoui.ty c -f l7awati`i from lime to time. 'Tire i.-41 §claw car houses Z !td lots Shall bL c�l'f red for Calc at pr;ccs noT exce•cdinp. ;rice; that enahle. Stich purchasers to alLnd1fv "cir rind obtain SfMr-:3ssi;icd firl at ti rl,{ {I.'.. Act 105 ar Hula 11++1ae) or RAeF.11y insured or assisted 'inrm,,-.Jnc (i.r., :F1 (A ion 2155 Program) iutead�,,d to znLDUMgt; hUn7eOWllcrll:Ii11 b)- 11 PtV .IJIJ 11WL1LTdtC-111;, 11W families WHEREAS, wi May 15, 1994, t: haTi �'G 0JV.i111U {)i dITi_vi c e 94-23 became effective, rtn ending the lailda froth Unplanned (U) to 4 ir._ le T.IA;lill I.4° icicwntial (RS -15) and Ml ulripl: 1=an,,illy Residential (Rhyl -51 fOrth�7-6- (i21 to tort 171on "�", wh�c#t provides for the JUVA- C1P3rIetIt (If aJforclrl~lc hous!n , as k -fl 7.v,. J. Housing opportunities for Hav4aii Iis'41;n14 d1 Jl lbLf lir-ovidV-d ill accardane c with the coridiAion imposed h,, :h C, Sat- Lind I.Ne nl,lli Fz.r�ll. 1'he niirnher nl' unit 'j1111, 1`1r111r1 iIn ,%4,1cI- T1) ,irw �L }orf+"++It, cd wh a. 1 meet vvitl"h th,; a�-) 11 -oval of tllti Ha%ka:I ill I.%. WHPRE.AS, the OriF-inal f)L c1cp x �((;vc1c red and sold two hued d and ftf en (215) ursits vyiti;in thu original prc�cct arL w �A 173 GG acrcs, and provided no affordable housing U111t:. in LhIs di,Q I (IF, M ent >tr ba. U; a n t I NVTIERE.'�S, 1.hc D-1 eloper pr4IpOs4, LI1ily t111,; KLIrta Three: Projeet will Consist of four- hll-ldl-�:u u1);..t fifty (450) residential un its on appro,, I' llate:ly 68.835 acres; and %VVI RL:AS, Chaptor 11, HCC, Section 1 I -50l(7) provides that tho aniwtdamu IlISL'.4'.ltr 1Ut11;i1t:l.r:1:t; �a:1 1--1,;.SL16,r�td by obtahling LAccss credits frunl �sno l:ute 011 r d aer 13111-X11;13C.LI:iill 1 1 1'; �1Slil WHERE —\ S. i"Ie OHCD has con firm"'d I WiII 15:1_rP.ess to c. nsent to such <111 F1:,i��nmer.t o x=ss housirig crediis for the1-1 "-vt lIi L:r's :tlleJ-1ded pr!.r1,nx :lrlli WI IFR1~AS. alae i7eveIDper h confirmed its wiIIingness to comply wL'i;] 111is `k:11 1'I e.:•C,01t f l:t'l ,} rcquirem ent -1mposed by the Sta.ct. LanJ L's i-, E_lo iilda t11 •rLJniL:rlt I 2C7.-7tl111.`-*f lydij 1anC:e f('r 11-e en"ere PFA)7eFtV ['['..1-.41s:tElt' o-: RI'rro%,1'• -LV §L' I f.` `lfl 4c11l I.V1r14 t!le L1Ll':I,2Ji! ll:'17ti cCSrn,kline:sl tilt'c:l [i1'(?[7:' 1-eti]LiCllTEei� o_nll:ti; :'elle.: t l-.aptcr 11, Article 1 of the Hwvvai`i ('01!m, {-' 7cl , r i:t:in to Affoi-,-:hle Housing PDIICy, •l l[`i lfr.ti the Mayo]., tll, d 'r7u1',i} 1.1-i%t+a[ i ( ?171cC c. Hoot 1':ri .ate i ('{,;lu1AIF1i1'1 DeveInPrrlent ("[)i ICF) I oi- t'leir die Iv audivrired rcrl'l; crltative• to E!,11e. I' I1]#!- -l:is HSyi'.'+C'I1J.'-w 1'r ltll die De.`VCkgx-,'t) purf-,ml one I'll anv ��r•1171'.19 afion offlic :3pti&AS $Or Sat9AIJk4l -aftht a1101uLLii1C housing reqtairements 1^`t'ltnty Code Section 11-5; and NOW, THEREFORE, in ctr;swA'!erationof the mutual covenants in this Agrzelnent, rand pursuant to Chapter 11, Article 1 (Affordable llousiin cfthe 14awai`i Count} Code ("Chapter I t"), the, parties hereby agree: its foIIcws: The Develope=r hall provide pr€ofamd OHCD shall verify ex,�;css .rrcdils are va'Hd• Upon Il,c closing of tete Developer's purchase of the 67 excess hou�lm,; credit-, v.-hicll are verifi--d by ( HUP, the DevOoper will be (-ntitled to u,,e said how ine L�.reclits to satisfy a.lte af;:ol dabh, housit.g Ceguil-e,rllcllts f61 Clic en6, L! pioject inc,lrldlnF, Gamlon C.'; rp e Original Devc1•,)11u Qn1 Projcct of 215 units and t11w Kolta Three Pro o'jitx t. c onsisLing of maximum of 4-70 residential url_tsl:rots, p.r:sarint t�'tho following- HCC, Chapter 11., Article 1 (Affordable Housing P1:L }' - 2. Upon the closing nl` the Devel(:,per's purchase of ih;: 67 excess housing eredits,a full Release of1his Agreement and any ether appropriate documenlation reasonably required by Olt par€ie" relalttd it) the sa(-LA'Eic:ti1M of the affordable houslug reclulremertis r'or this 450 rt:s:clen ial Urtit..lr,oita Three Prujei t shall be executed by the parlies hereto and r --corded by the Devcloper wish the Bureau ofCoriveyanccs, or with the. Land Court of tl;c Stir. ofHa�.vaii, as applicable, with Dv -, super payh-IL� all c as#s of recerdalion. 3- In this evLwnt the Developer builds more than 450 residential units, Developer shall i;lata in the rewired credits to satisfy the affordable housing rNuirement for the additional units. This A.frreerncra surcr=c:dcs all otller ;l�-7: ee- WPI iind understandings 1:�'%-1i&:'I1=r -•1-<1.1 :}r %,,'r':Iien1 1l1.1(lC hy.retvJ-Ore cI... C.6-.'.1?ell ll)(11,2ll=.)rI's Iy herewith bx tho oarties on the �tjbieotmatter hereef. l ho.- grog isions ,}f ihis A' -[r Cnlentlrnty not he r:rt diiou�, L51_CVCd,,11LIl-i-1z�Cd L.s��E,i :�} A1101her written instruir ent e.xe, ut d ')v th4 :),-ii 2. This A reemew hill r -li wi;h flie l::rlci r.;cl sh,-3H Le binding, upLl : and imire to the henel-11 of the: par .ics I-L�' ;to' alrc! 11HUR rc:J)LW :i.ti ;uir. ai11 � arld r4 ti.,i.,f; . This. Agreetnent shall be rcc.ol-Ihd :l��.JI;si the title is t:ic Affordable l lousing Site by the Deweluper at thi: BUrc>att c31 t."t.,.ve ances car `'•'iil the Lattd Cc, of the, Slate of Hawaii as applicable, within; rlllr .: ;.}li day:irrcr hcing f1illy cxeti,itw!J the parties. The parties tc- iaktt str.'h ric]V_lris and execute "1 Iles dc,c.irr,ents as arc ri ragortabI'V rl'.c4flrY l;>'tfl'tXAAMle :x.M : C:Ll-r)- +?l!1 1h.' iIll enl of 111isAf,rrxcrr:lnt A, provide(l In 1'I�rr�c.r _ h al)ov.,, upor 11c�L2,1kip. -r' purc1!,14t of the 6? exxC ' S � 114-,,jSIlig Cz&(l;iS, CA& Fr'sftIk� S=7i;1.; '�7e:CUtC' q:lE r'CC d ,1 i!.111 R toa,',e ilii t1i; ASreenient a1ung vyit] i ar)y otl;er ap[)ropriatc 1)Lu ue iati011. N-xkcc-s. All notices to b:e given purst.ran` to this A,InL.crrx-a:' siliil L%, it; vvt-11,11? :117!E Sh;l.l be .:Ir..,11tLl gh'tP when mailed by CrTli1��41 :+r rr.�i�krr x� Ittlil, r i.lrtr r_.,i�i1r1 ntlueA-'J, tO itirt larrrtic,-, kreto ill the, addresscs s 't „ lrtls kclow.. o to :,ucl- otlr_r plac.o a, a party r -,ay fmin rime to tin^ . c:�.�i_.n7te .r k�TlrirlQ. To the 01unly: Hlausing ,Adivinistralor Offiire. o' I lousing and C :onil�lrriity L)t+ ':'1o1}rr.rr.i 1',q0 Kino'oIc Street, SaI(c. 102 1 l), Hawn: -i 96720 To the Developer: 1t�1 ilua6rrlyi i;reet 1111.1. lT-'-wai�i �-671(} ATTh : ROILtr;d I IIgaMc rhe C'lw-1-) aro 0'e ia:r LicniCC.. i .rL 1-ici-cLLm1fr. cte>iUtt ste. any [Uilhe til'Ll;l_e]'e{i 4JJIl`�Sti1 tL ',4'�:I�IL.tiUk7r-i'.piciiL iwtl4vti LC!"{,)<;4:::iGC:_ or ot.ii:r Cornjnuiii4 �LL,tLlt.s sisal- be sent. 4. The Developer L rc , if applicable, that .L 11 Laltc all actions necessary to effect amendment of this ,1g. uc;inent aw may hU ,.i w.,th aineadments >_o HCC Chapter 11, sL17:1 �1'I M11[11iCable• riI!^h, rurulr,ti I C:Ies. procedures, rulings, or other official Niatem nts pQrl:.1ning Lo Ch-ap.ci I y. 'lThIs iw,1runirt Itt inav be cxec ]ted in tv, [° oi- inu:-c ?-uiki vfth r) aI1 CJUE)tCT aL'LS have btvn cxz cruted, i:ad, k couiLt.:j pm i dnth hC �,A - II i ltr�tL1 Lir! 1)[4211 -all but 1ti`hen assonibIcd shall CX?l ,,Jtute orrL; and the `:rmD Itlsir'lJirl -n- aiA 01Lt.i L1.Li' the forwe and effect its though al: of tilt ha;i L:xccuit cd a Siil j,, nat.lrc page- Any ulie:xtcuted dijplE:111e 1?f'<=s. Vnly- be 011-dttcd 1101r] 111v asmt,s ,l?3cd original docurnevr. G- The partie.3 aUree lilt no txir-l.v shall b,2 :lL-4:21-1ULi ck, 11L LhC di -life! ,1I thir Agreement, alld 1 UA11Cr• Lh LI 111 tilt C; uw. {Isis r1gr4LIRL:1LL 11 i t'Vcl ti:011 t' LACd > . a couriof law, such court �l.all sial crrr:MruC :hi-, Agrwt:mcrsl cr ili'4 urDvisions of thk Agroe.mem qymnst piny l,mtL' aw th(- rlrifre-r of this AgreCniortl. 7. 'Phis agreement shall he rc�oded +, i;ll lite Sixx of lla5,vaii Bureau of Conveyances, and a true attd corretit c i:�l,ti sha.I bz rrovI'dC:i Io the Counter of liaivaii 0Mce of Housing & Community De ve lc% p inent within 30 days - 8. This Agreement shall be governed and wnstrued in accordance with the laws of the Third Circuit Court of the State of Hawaii, [THE RE, MAINDER OF THIS PAGE 1S INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS f{ fl N IN WITNESS %VIAEREOF, the parties hereto have executed -Iris A k'_r KE L.V"L r'f -As c.'the day and year first written above. I ASThtr VATator Date: 11 APPROVED AS TO FORM A-N,D LEGALITY-. Deputy Corp«ratifm Coun'.el Date: 61 / -7 DEVELOPER: Kma Three LLC - a I fawai'i I i m irc d I m im I ity c Dm p F, n -%.- Name, I (_i, x. Title: 1'reamj1-tT- cd '11—ma I li=ce i I A' artd N r of 01 P. LIJ.'- a H.: I iiii—ited b. lay u(,)mpany and mti n htr i, ['Kona Thret J,1,C Dale: COUNTY: COUNTY OF I [AW All a municipal c-oijoi aIjc,g c4i ti Sale Df I !Liwai'i STATE OF HAWAII SS. COUNTY OF HAWAII On this I Oth day ofJanuaU, 2022, before me perorally appeared LEE E. LORD, to me personally known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the Managing Director of the County ofHawai`i, a municipal corporation of the State ofHawdi`i, that the foregoing instiurnent was signed on bohalf of the: Ccunty of Hawa `i by authority given to said Mayor of the County ofHawni`i by Sections 5-1.3 and 13-13 of the County Charter, Counly of Hawaii (2018), as amended, and assigned by the Mayor to the Managing Director pursuant to Section 6- 1.3(h) of the Co-onty Charter; and said LEE E. LORD acknowledges) said inst-nu-nent to be the free act and de -ed of said County of Hawaii. -' _ Print or Typc . &aie Notary Public, State (ifHawai`i 4 My Col-mrrission Expires: 1741'01,122 NOTARY CER 1111CAT 1UN Dot;. Ualc: i_ L.1u'22 No. of Pages: 7 Notazy Name: AMBER K.S. KEPOO Third Circuit Affordable Hous Lag ^ �— Doc- Description: Agtn_qment- Notary Signature 10{27 Date STATE )SS. COUNITY OF RAIXAN 41 On 111aA'k)1-1 before me. appearedRo bv� 6—Wi I fianr& to M personally known, ti, ho. being by me duty sworn, did say that_-. Int, is the jy'J,� 0,_C- _ of KONA TMZFE LLC: that the instrument was signed ort behalf of E" ' )NA i I R I - I- I IX ' 1).- ; ii i 1i ori i y of its member(s); and acknowledged said instrument to be the fm,—Itct andducd of �a'td c4)iiipany. , NQr]EA_Ry C ERTWICATION Doc. Da-tc: ( No. of Pages, N: itary N;: m nphrn N Tomono �4 Doc AFFORDARLE C I FC il'It f- to H 0 U SIN G AG I Z F EM F N V. T M Ks (3) .7_6_ 021:016 and (3) 7-6-0211:017 — � y i14..4�.stirjf Notary Signature I )atc- --------------------------------- EXPJRATION. October 17,2022 Debra N. Tomono 4 '"~•4 Pij))J1L,'>[a'e of HaWaN jr Vj MY C0111 "I I ss i ork exp lFes, 00I)AW 17s 2022 , NQr]EA_Ry C ERTWICATION Doc. Da-tc: ( No. of Pages, N: itary N;: m nphrn N Tomono �4 Doc AFFORDARLE C I FC il'It f- to H 0 U SIN G AG I Z F EM F N V. T M Ks (3) .7_6_ 021:016 and (3) 7-6-0211:017 — � y i14..4�.stirjf Notary Signature I )atc- --------------------------------- EXPJRATION. October 17,2022 EXIII.Bil'A VA I LIMP A11 i.Obi '3Ft-t . Q I' , A ld �1,.i I: w c?! &LC laad;s) dlcw7;K-A in I'Dd cu-,mmd by ;Oy,�• 1 Qx-nl Nmnb4T 44)5, F.ar-3 C. rin;--,op) Awij-:! Nmu,�-rx ' M% App -n.43 in Vi.!-„iv Kmj*imwa ivid H Lli-Flq'Y;-- $;T;L 3569W fO.n P M,-=) siftcwt, jy4kG still lri,at A( :.un: f Nl"h V.OYA� D;land LLA C.Oupl� of lkwZ31, Sialf, of Pawwi, briw LOT 2, if.' C'Mbi)LVA-6 !11141 Rc�unlng Ul ffiE 161,th.WCO (Antift of z.ir, pEltel 6f Lllyd, bei-og FLI in tlle nrjfthlves,, 4xmer -3: is (summ) ami mrmpt ttt milmmmmiy sad,, or Fawau daft ROV6. F.A.P Rc-w- ; I llr;�Jc-1 NA 11A.W-O, the toordica” of 5t�&, Es ipLl Of kg3jlaine Ti:lLrTw,, I -Q Tri.wipWiuR Swkm 'KA4 1W, L<:D& 9,2317.13 F=: WUdL 1,11c il- 1111, Iruc sokrb: 521 22' M 55.69 fel 434 i' -I hvmi BrIt Itc-mal, F. A.P. RnuZt I I Proitel Nf; I iA-0 Or ;sr 30 70.75 1"t 3. "I 4-8° 35.07 frt�c A z;mac; 4. 154' 1 V 197M f4Cd bI&M LAftjt; fi,-o-1 goag the imauxiej of Royo NT= 4475, UWA Commmien Award 7M, Ajia= 43 LzF gw"Mou; 6. Isse is, 17-97 feN mlcng mmq 7- 311- 55! 11997 feet aiDuit— tw,%6a6r of Rtyl limes l 4475, IA,4 0QE1tlRrliuiou Awatd 7713, Apafta 43 40 V kwfim Kamigrnafu (W 2-& 9- 331' IT 15' 14116 ren NIMJE sm-m; Tkutic &Tccg Lat 14 (Sa=m) fc3T the =1 tkyitica (13) cgwq M- tht &W mimul aftd d1m.0m be�b�: U, w 55, 54AS T� 12. 69° 0 16.70 feet; 11. 46' 390 114,_ 7 fc e C', 5 K 51' w 6331 15. w al' 139.94 lbeh 16, 51' 2Y 175.76 f'esl, 17. f116" 3Z 91.+9 fccL, It 44' 49 [ 7046 Il. 2.a' 55r 247.57 16a; 211. 37" 21' IU6- ru-04 21. 31" 21! 3V 425.56 fact; Thence &lung Lnt 15 (Sham.) far mh& mxt trrt (10) vnumc% tilt dirm[d- L hfSCP.s 6fing: 22. 37° 01 57.76. feet: 23, 66' 24' 13$_13 feta 24. 44' 61' 114.46 ruc€; 25. 67' 41' 13 Lm t=4 26, 1031, 13' 107.13 face; 217, 69' 30' 339.97 fce 2.11. 31. 417 114.38 fi9t; 29. 88° 52' 6CA ted; 30, 114. 04' 60,71 iaee: 31, 77' 29, 13241 fcct to thr point of bcglrurinp wS wntvinh8 un Kc -a of 37-935 avers, mmm cur first. ;[}[ TFif n lUl"f'Id F,.•.I,,r:.:ti 'r:.', "1]^ T" M'd T" ftr_ Iti_Jwzti Lad t sty pure^,, 2& --se-ii,-ul n t-r�;., l [ `::o-5-,'e•r I?P-.E l i .IMM +~-Ilt%AstF 4, FV, 1-,l :e. ter •' I, One Rurf a of tSi.he ,.:rale or F-.h:kai�'.n 1 i',�i4i foF� ef,: -,r t" [B.- i-7 T') 'ht -,um,, rmd Cf T i,A Csf t -A _c it SAU"-wa] :�, w:. �sI i l„'y k-Jc f,-+:.1'yrsA-m�rIY 0 'J0 pll ,tt [40j aaJoa isl and 9nd; North X,-)oa, IA nd and Crum,yr ct Haid i. S¢ Te rf Hruwjmi. RD; -dl rVxrY': 3217, L3rr:3 Caecal iasie:T Awlt iU 63 to Jahn W. h.4unntsnd R.nyOt; rjif nt 447" r L'*Tx1 t.'.nrr'.TT isskin AovrirJ 7 . Apana 4w to V. ifarn"Mu. Be}p*r 7g Ai. an Ungle M Lhr. PlItt#XIV bWndary d ails PaIC;ZI Of &sd, beim also the Nc llhv-,-s'u ly w mar of Low 1 & 6- t ai iktid m Olt cart it 1NeslerJy 1 cuadaty o f Loi I A -'r . Ma caasdlna�es ef seed poirA of bVinFing inferred to Covemrnent Sun-ey Treangulat on S!Ai rr' AILUA RTH 1AER1DIAJ%1j' i &.0 9,23 ',� fe-'.N, .atti:,,n`f 1 !.6�7.CT 1e. -It Easi aW rLmIng byazkmutimmea st,r Iica: !iu---SSuu.h: 1- 39'' 41' IT %1 1 f= - ak,tg LSI "(-G-104 .Zti 15 FU -.,.i' ri=nn 'YTTGi $oar, 'e ren:irWk4 u' f 7,cl Pat -fl 4475, Land C,:nrrn s33nAw,. d ;7°.3. Nana r_ i to 1(, Kan 4�r ak, to a poifr, P 1;ra ryzej f�x by fraxt len 110] wur�cs !Qkvmlr i �A:itg Lot L S1fea-i� (Ck:-uw; C° H .uaii) S t UiL°a -Da Urxn xw.ay; t7fi:f 317 7Cj ft r=itiNor u I R12yai Paluit 1.475.. Find Ca7Y'imidiwdon Ate; n rd 7? t ; 4,7.-m 43 to V. Fla. nix 2. 95' 3. 9E., Ftf,. 277 37 ;7,^` 1r. � mint; ~tiH;Sts7,fi �rr�e - � f S i 5s'r�9.��swa Srr+xtr. YC�N-�ak�+,��,y. J �tfvFJ�i F15; d�t9� 7 I 4, 74' W 132 ,84 fad[ to a pdnt S. 107* W K73 (PrA to a pokC 6- gal 53' 191.87 rw t6 il T. 1A, ir 98.73 rc;A,- I ;: a I vil K. A. 80' 071 T1.22 IoW' -.i rn.rii, 9. N, 30, 20. L PL) nk: la 831 2T f iS1 ri F �r- M 11, 64' W *132 r m -I 1a.i ThwcDp for IN nrM thr*3) f-Ar,-.,Vir-g em -,q LO ?4 (Strean, CJ Fzv4,�I! (Hormhaa Sand Dralrtapmy7 12. 211, 2U 3V 70A ILWaloo? wro �cw ol Lalvd Av?wd 77'13, A7 --n2, 43 10 V. to a PoIr". 13, Mr, 21' Q7.42 Fvvt:-1cwca Lai,J C*Mfi%L--[cn Awaiii 7713. Apo -Q3 43 �a V. Kamtmalu aml Pa!ent D217. ! � I Ai,,,Ad rH31) tLj J(913 I P. IVU -010 I 14- fib' W MAQ tFist Ejvothe re'rairce's _,, Rcvn: Patint [,:IF0 I-rf Avorir- 7-1 Ok')P.na 41 Ru V Y;C-,)tu-cL(i PA.uivi 13a - avo, f. -r I N3 n mi fq!'. (I Oj folwwLI11-1, -,Inn 7 L v I R4 ( ) ( r- ry i114 tLf I I (H,-.F5F�rs' 41 �911 arlti [!If- c�-Ialrdtr �4 447trIV Av.-,@rc 7713. ADarw e-31oV himiL-inaj ; J74 = 49' 140.64 feet W 2 POTI t1 C-, 246' 33' 8741 (00t 10 a PDInU ?-i1' r,:y 170,04 falai lz+ a PC-.. nt, 14. 2 5 El 01f, 140.06 fiRa' t,,; :a; 61, 2d I C-31 98.89 {oat to a FQ4.w: 20. "91 Yy 104-41 feet to 4 Point 0'Y+t 1.1 R-�c 2 rf 4 "1=6 7hLWAS ASSOCArM Lw SrrftLywz - 7'r',T N VW -,m4 Sfi 21. 24.ql 49' 63.22 teig to at P*t; 22- 77V 55' 33.94 tit fnapblrk: 2-5, ?92' 36 W.57 NO to a POW; 24- 276' 5�V -Q9Zr 1W to A ON; 75. - W4.. 021 65.41 fetit slcma LrA 2-A and -a-':irq -ftn Rgyal Patarj; 4,175 1.a = ;J C Or.1 rr i 104 krf; Award 7719, AP111-0 -" 11) V. KFm%.-,' A r ul polrlt. 26. 21' 41' 50" 8$0 refit alarxi L -at 2-C a7 -.c Royal P�Ient 44 rhI Ti -A N. -Y, (! Apona L3 LL) V. K", tc, a P.Ny": 27. M-9' 87 20" -at m I � ci o! 2 r o -A iih.j., Ow rc'ivii)d'--) r, f E �-'!. L3i w;s cri Royal 'Q 17,4j: �I 'o Awrkr(l vE1bV IQ john P, kAv�r, t4- D F,,c.ir.tl 2a, 5' 07' 20' 44.8* feel Ci'*Tkg I ot �!-C arle, edc-"; the remai-INN (1-1 Roval PMn; s"17, L d C-orrrri-3ion A.,;ar �' W�D to Jul ji P. Moo, to a poin.L. 2or MW 00, x.72 Pr' fi.1rnI of 12 arid Aimfl 11B qmai,"fl Of 1.1u. I., LC a —hmxr ;w tkir1(-.K; rl'AL L .ar, Irir c� P -: -1 P -A al), 44 tMOMr.q ;1!7r,, , ` i . � rem �,e -�rl coni -9 Ismr. I Agana 43 to V, F=,--.narraiU � 30. 3" (i2 2�S.06 �.v Ld 11 arr] �L4 IQ tl. j pzici. 31, 77, 1�e 20.55 feel, 2 rThq Lct 10 1,-1 a po-t; 32. 4' W 2,V 73 feet a.L� Ld 10arld L-Otl) [a ij prumil. 33, 34" GZ 157. Of) If --0t along Lot 3-A-3 b a pcin� ;3Ar 337' W x17.60 f L ril, Lkxv UA I. -ti . LA t -AN -2 end 1-c' -1 -A--! 'c; 12: ij -x A:: o tj uiji: 1 ning a nd W Lig-i1c.i.19 iLl I -;u :ri u 21,. 757 Acxesl 6UEJEC 1. -C', EVER, Y Gjvs,-b 6jta:.,rid!IE£d to be CASIde the 0.21A amival 7r). -c. V',6 �Y, lav;p� r..'G- 7%-; -3 -in 1jr% I rhan*9 11, -,rd: �rea� of Mannusl U103 IC -G f _J0d VI'J! LTi.1:' AJU d.-..pl tjjar3 I lcuL or with drafnogo czruia 1"s Dian I square 71..V-1I'l 3 or 4 VIES P -110111111S /-.SSOrX.r'159 —L0-'dSG:vcWm V. -It J!% d' Sf: ':F?, RG40-lal 7 {1f'xi1 1 LOT I -A r :i's. and -=rKs bra c r+&by;evEfA trawl i M am at chance iloodj, Zarr-'- AE is ai floozy hazed ii i.l idk-ion by five iia :]nnv I chanct Nood, BFE deterrt6neL j, Zwtn AE= (ape t 1xd hU1 u- I, n^ Birt; ;L E o inurrdalx-, r by Na 1% annLW chafice loDA f *dway aroas in ZONV AL T I)etlnodway i5 the Cam -16 p1 7t-'ezzm Plus Sriyadjwmt IEwoplain afeas trwt r.=t w kept tree of eneenarhmaat so Itrat the 1 % snm W chavvce flo Dd can be CM -Md without immasi•,g t", EWE), 8s per Flood Irt:Srcrance i ;e hltip (f .�,R.Po9.j Carnrr;unity Fa rr NwnbSr 15 161 C%2 mase[ Sepiefnber 29, 2017., TO GETHERWITH, sfxnen. AiJ- ' nrAeC as:- d'J:i i;r F'L iia _ ' t. rr t.c ^s I r 18-0-1 0 sulxct'taaiLxv arxi b tri ry:oJe i�L rtyc3esafkled Jy ! Rslaca7r,j r:t_.a'�r;�trvrt. ALSOmGETHIERMTH,ex lIngE �arretys`G", C-f.'D%nd'aI-*frslt rnctl.Jh o PUPCai358spre+rlrMlyrcBo.dedatthOWrOntr&GcmuWwnc inHorxAub, Hawail kiUbcr21;� Ps cep we. AL.54 TOGETHER WIITH, oxis5ng Easement 7' f<x Rbad �nj UWity Pur et as PrO%inusly revaried St tive 84He-.0 d CMVeyances to Hoodu lu, H awes II I n I -I ter 21836 Page 3E end Oocument Number 2004-M6515, K S[r131 4 F'c� t 4 d 4 La�� 4r�veycrs r r-."7;'..�, JC9Jrka:CJ�A! ft.n��ra�•�,� l�xma.=46,4(!-".4'' �0 ftar*vKim Va• ar wu d Ha'val1 I 00,1 , C 74-501 1 Anc KL!;-hka]ole I Iw) kait1A :-Ku.la, T fa wai% 96740 PhWk-i80" 'i :ty 70 Fax ? M )3 vi- 56.1 Septeinber 1, ?017 Mr. Richard Wheelock Kana Three LLC 141 11ualdlai Street Hilo, HI 961720 Dear Mr. Wheelock: PLANNING Di-+PARTNIE"N_t, County of Hawaii Michael Yee Offerl'nr Darya Arai OrprtV Director IIII I�alla,:Ii St w;tr, �,Uile 1.11:0, E:3w:aiy'xi 96720 I'-a�n c r.R?lk l 961.82ag Fax i90; -961-8'42 Application to Amend Rezone Ordinance No. 02-1,11 (RET 4',1M) Subject: Project Consistency vti ith Kox*.a CDP and Status of Plan Approval (PLA -07-000325) Applicant: Kona Three LLC (formerly Kona Vistas LLC and (}amrex, Inc.) Tax Map Keys: (3) 7-6-021:016 & 017 This is in response to your July 24, 2017 letter requesting the Planning Director's determination of whether the multi -family residential project called "Kona Tillage" is consistent with the 'Kona Community D(weloprnent 'Plan (CDP). The project includes approximately 508 residential units consistent with the property's RM -5 zoning, According to the Official Knna Land I'se Map (Figure 4-7) 11 the Kana CDP, the weslem Portion of the subject property is situated in the Pua`a-Wai -aha Village Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Floating Zone.. The location cEtl:is TOD has not yet becorne fixed by a master plan and project district zoning; however it is like.'y that 01e. future TOD will be located makai of Quecn Ka`ahumanu Highway and mauka of Ku�i'ini 111"gh ay. Therefore, the Director 1 as determined the subject properties are not located in the -1'C0. It is our understanding that the applicant will he submitting an application to mend conditionS of the Zell IIl or€linance and then the proposed project will be developed according to Policy LU - 2,8( ; )(11), which indicates the project may be developed in accordance with the existing zoning, subjecs to the following requirements: Parks in Policy PUB -6.2, Affordable Ilnu,sing in Policy HSG -5,2, Street Standards in Policies TRAM -2.1, TRAM -3.1, TRAM -3.7, Wastewater in Policy PUB -4.4, Concurrency in HCFC 25-2-46 and Policy TRA1V-6,1, and Smitsitive Resources in Policv FNV-1.5. w,�,x._Vrrn, [SEP � 5 �_�� � N�w�i'a Courrlc is orf Egmu1(tpvrmney ProvOer and {'frrployer Rt�lTOin r haw [wniV. rav Mr. Richard Wheelock Kona Three LLC Page 2 September 1, 2017 The sec -and purpose of this letter is to infcrra you that Plan Approval PLA -07-000325 is no longer valid per Section 25-2-7 of the 'Zoning Code because it was not Utilized within two (2) years of its issuance in NOT Thus, the applicant will need to seUire a new Plan Approval before building Permits can be issued for the multi -family residential development_ Should you have questions, please contact Maija Jackson sof my staff at 961-9159. Sincerely, e4q Y MICHAEL Planning Direc#or Jd:mad F:lwpwin6lX-4lailzx`T.rn ri',f]rtenrpin.3tio�i Lt ']ie�l ,ck koja COSY I-EJ,U.dar; cc: Kona Planning Office .flan M_ Okamoto, Nakamoto, Okamoto & Yamamoto via email Rohcrt G. �� illiatns- Kona Three LLC via email FINAL Royal Vistas Tax Map Key (3) 7-6-021: 016,17 Traffic Impact Analysis Report Kona, Island of Hawaii November 30, 2021 Prel}red for Komi Three LLC. Prepared by F International PzCViQLF; S11t-11 Ii:tr. k elate Application �l i I)c 111111) 1. 1 A , I1� I'i.ii K",.1 , V 11,,x'; October 2018 Zoning Amendment I) 'tl l'i T1 ti :lk' IIY i-1Err 1 7, i 1_, i P -21), ri [ Or the Royal Vistas May 020 Dram. Cnvi!ro mien#al Assesstnerrt ir.:;i 1 i:,li ti lri13:ir� \n.iRq—wr[ icer the loyal Vistas .luly 2020 1 Final l;nvironmemal!'Assessment Royal Vistas TEAR SSFAI internatii3naf 'I'.Iltic• of Contents I. FIKOJELI La -SCS P-ION..........................................................................................................................1 II- EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS...........................................•....... ....--........ ..,........ .,...,...,,.--........ ........... 4 A.Geometric Configuration..................................................................................................................4 1. Roadway Configuration.................................................................................................................4 2. Study Intersections.......................................................................................................................4 3. Pedestrian Facilities....... ........ ........ ......... ____ ........... ....... ,........ ,............................ ,....... ____ 7 a. Bike Facilities....................................................... —...................... ............. ........................ ............ 7 5. Bus Steps and Bus Routes ................................... ............................................................. ..._......... 7 B. Volumes..............•...........................................................•.................................................................7 1. Vehicular Volume................................................................................................. ................7 2. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes...................................................................................................9 C. Traffic Operation Analysis. ....... ...................... .................... ................................... .................... 11 1.. Level of Service Methodology ............................. ..................................................................... ,..11 2, Existing 2019 Intersection LOS...................................................................................................12 3. Existing 2019 Mitigation.............................................................................................................14 Ill. future (20241 fear -Term Condttions— Completion of Phase 1 ......... ................................................18 A. Srli rounding Area Developments............................,.............................................,.........................3.8 : Living Stones Church.....__ .. ...... ...... ........... ... __ ... ........ ............... — .... ....... __ 18 2. Pualani Makai.... ............. ..... .............. ............. .......... ,........... ,,.................. ,................. .....,........ .,.18 3_ Youth Gymnastics and Sports Fitness Facility..............................................................................18 B. Rodetlway Construction Projects .......... .............. ........-............. .......... ............ ....... ........ ..1g 1. Widening of Route 11 from Henry Street to Karnehameha III Road.... ............ - ...... - ..... .......... 19 2. Laky Street Extension..................................................................................................................19 3. Alii Highway from Hualalai Road to Keauhou Shopping Center.................................................19 C. Multirnodat Plans ....... ......... .................... .........................................................................................19 1. Bike Plan Hawaii....................................,...........................,..............,................,.........................1.9 2. Statewide Pedestrian Master Plan..............................................................................................19 D. Corr7r'unit,P P',ri..............................................................................................................................19 1. Kona Ccir7r unity Development Plan..... ....... ............ __ .... _.._ ....... — ............. 19 E, Volumes .,.. ............... .............. ............... ,........ ,............,,..................... .............. ,,,....................... .....21 1 Future 2024 Without Project Volumes....................................................... .....21 Royal Vistas T1AH 55FM Interna tianaI 2. Project Related Volumes .............. ............................... ........ ..,.................... ................ ....,............ 21 3. Future 2024 With Project Volumes ....... ............................ ................... ................... .......,............ 23 F. Future 2024 Intersection Traffic Operatlon Analysis......................................................................27 1. Future 2024 Without Project Intersection LOS...........................................................................27 2. Future 2024 With Project Intersection LOS...,,..................................................................,,.._....29 3. Future 2024 With Project Mitigation,.........................................................................................31 4. Future 2024 With Project Segment LOS..................................................................................... 35 IV. Future (20291 Mid -Term Conditions— Completion of Phase 2 ........................................................... 36 A. Surrounding Area Conditions..........................................................................................................36 B. Volumes..........................................................................................................................................36 1. Future 2029 Without Project Volumes. . .... ........ .................................................. .................. _36 1; Project Related Volumes .... ......... ......... _............ ,....,........... ..,........ ,................... .,...... ,,..,............ .36 2. Future 2029 Witt, Praject VQl4 rnes...................................,....,............,.....................,....,,...,.....,.38 C. Future 2029 Iniu-sectiun Traffic Operation Analysis..............................................................._......42 1. Future 2025 l'dit-�out Project Intersection LOS .................................. .............................. ......... .-42 �. Future 2025 V.'it Projcct Intersection LOS.........,......................................................................44 Fiiti,re 1l)21- b%'it-, F'n,jAr- Klit P'. -�ti-in .......... . 4. Future 2029 4^,Iit.•- Project Segment LOS ............................. V. Future (2039) Lcnt Ter -r, C-cnditions............................................................................. .....................51 A. Surrounding Ai L,, Coii::iti.ins..........................................................................................................51 B. Volume5.............................................................................. ..51 1. Future 2039 Without Project Volumes.......................................................................................51 2. Prdjett Related Volumes .... ............................ ................... ,........ ............... ......... .............. ...........51 3. Futk.re 2039 With Project Volumes..................................,,..,.,...,...,............,....;.....,.......;,...,.....,.51 C. T4it.are 2039 t^tecsection Traffic Cperatbn Analysis ................. ..................................................... 54 1. Future 20'-W Project Intersection LOS...........................................................................54 2, Future 2035 With Project Intersection LOS..............................................................,....,,...........56 3. Fulk.nl, 1039 With Project Mitigation..... ... ...... ............. ........ .......... 58 4. Future 2039 With Project Segment LDS......................................................................................61 VI. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ......................._...........,.................._..,..................................62 VII. REFERENCES........................................................................................................................................64 Rnyol L`istas TEAR 55FA7 interna6imill l,is1 rFl I'i1„tul'c l1,,-1n, i; Prniect Lo,t ,. i_­iMap_._ ..................... ............ 2 i:..lr4 : Cc�nt'i1 IL1.11 wi1.' I'I:at....................... .,.3 l i�.lrc 3: 1 i17,-, 2i119LtrIV, 0111i_'W't'son.............. 1'1' IFC! 1: RLU..11� 11, Nath I :li1.1<: lir il., I ;ualalai Rd. 24 -Hever Volume Distribution (2016) ............. Fi,urr h: Exa-,riii, 019 PL'::I., I I o t L I I'.I1 1,23 .............................................................................................1D 1:1v.11 r,. KorLI L. ,1:1 _.nttu'it ItL•'.k'_,,I'nFl_ 11: plan..........................................................................................20 II'1.,'1,.4.1 FIC!11, Hourvolmlies ................ ...................................... ............ _.. 22 ]ri .rCC 8. ENI,;1'712LI ] tiir.uc Lan . [_L7tii"ur's"I( r) ............. I'is .l re 9: 1`ll1 'r' I I'I;,j; R'-klio i i.ri;;,.....................................................................................................2S F] s.Irc 10: FL11.1.1". 211-2-1 1i 1111 Pro j L'(a Peak Hour Volumes........................................................................ 26 1 1�.irti ` I. t13�t< .:ail_ LL 1� 11114,1 11 'I;,IL4r li.:,1k IJour VL)trulars...................................... ...37 Fit -: Ir: 12: F hij;�L' 2 Lihojnd Pr. -,.J ' ''..................................................................................... 39 I^iu.iiL 13: Pl ;i,L: i kili`:L111L1 P[o Lc: Rdlilc(I TrIns................................................................................... 4D 1; i, :l r:' 14: 1 1:7r11, •) 13„ iih 1'r IjL'i': 1'r:1h IIrn1r Al.Lames... ....................... ...............................................41 Fit{ire 15: Fi:�r,rz� }16 11 11Ili)'_]I 'r.,I1fLt Peak Hour Volumes ................ S2 FiL_'Lrrw 16: 1: L.-L.r,1 1111 F'l. 1cc-. 1,L..Lk 1-14 {11r \'rjlurnes.........................................................................53 Lill cd"rate}res 121'?Ic 1: Rim('V :JwI i:.fllc V111umvc.............................................................................................................7 I )Ic 2: F'r,lsllns2 .") I ii I't'cl '•{ :<`a IL1'(a VQILIM,:-w....................«..,..............................................,.,..«. I :1:)Ie 3. LOS ('rico :,l Ior. 1lI mp.(iJ,,c l Il;r,L'I `•ll,. 4,1.5..x........... Tnole 4: LCIS Cr1reI 1 1,-r Si',1. 1 -1174:1 f11: 1-,;, :i011l .................. T:lble 5.- V, lIsl1n g 21.11 4.1 Ir1'. `, CIIoil 1.L"'. L:I + I 4 r" - 'CL .......... f ac�1C 6.' l :.r.lr Hour ��ar urI,iliil3O't '1111' :r.'.111C VOIL11'l'�w,,.......... T; 1,_ ': T'L,. .-i ";11-11- lV.1rr;11-1 on ':? I,,,- 1r::1-: is VoI[I:1................. 15 .T,, 51 1t ......... 10:)1 1.-ciStlLa l i�11C11T1Lli1 — Ro'.lte I I and L.—d n �v-eet Lr' -t -Turn Signal PhL ws Ln A'te-rjia1,ii es ............. 17 I :1;3Ir` Estim.lt ` I -11 -Is (i011rI:.;od - Phase I..................................................__.......... ................. .......... 21 T.i:)IL- ''} t` ILI1;1L' :.aI Route I l S- ,ir d KLKikif11 1 ..........23 1113Ie 12: 1:.�:ti1111^ '0 Li r le'C7IUmes .9t I''L, ]I'iLlai.11LI Sti,eet............................................................23 1;,31L' 13: l il,n-t .'.0.'.4 Witl.om I'- 1��:l Illi[' °irl I.. \L'1 ......................................................28 1:1:dc 14: F•L11,11k: `024 Willi h oI VL i IntLi1 , t11,11 Li'; wI oI `?:i k ik:C.............................................................. 30 1 :1:31e 15: Future '0"-1 I?ea"A l;•'. I' t'sarr3ll'13........................ .......... . 2 1:IML: 10: 1 2 i'c.L:,-Il4..11 .iirr.mI.•................•...•..............•,......••......•....•............-........................32 Table 17: FL11 I1 e I \Vith Pr,'. cL 4 - R.,iIrte l 1 and Kuakini Highway Left -Turn Sip rial Phasing 11Itcrnatives.................................................................................................................................................33 18: Fulin-c 2024 'Without: N iecr Roundabout Analysis at Unsignalizeci ...............33 T:Elle 19: F inure 2024 Willi Proles'( - ROLite I I wid i_ako SEreet Lett -Turn Sigmi Phu,i'.1iu. ;%11crILatI\tr .34 I',.)Ik' 20: Future 2D24 Wirh Proiect')�grmmt LOS....................................................................................35 I - i -, le 2l: 1~'.somated Trills (je.nerated by Project— Phase 2.,......................................................................36 I _1:5Ic 22: Future; 2029 Without PrQ.iC:t Intersection Level of Service .......................................................43 Royal vistas TIAH SSFM Internatiana I Ti'-NeD: Fkitm-e'()_N W1_thPrq.1et'!I I evel of Service ....................... ................................... _46 T -.l,) I c 24-- Ftii I 2021PLLak-1 It)-, i- k1 m'r:ini ......... ....... ............. ........ ........ .................. - ...... - ... 47 25: I -L11.11 k: '.0.111 1'L7;11-1lo-'i ........ ...... ...... -1 ......... 48 T I c 26: FL I I t i re 20-19 W L i: I . I I i c ti L•4 - Ruute I I and Kualcini Highway Left -Tum Sign at Ping .. ................ ................................. ..................... .................. .................................................... 48 I c 27: Ful LL i -c 2029 1. u 11-TUr I I ?I1&411]2 A I t ci i i a t iv es With Project a I L ako S treet .................................. 49 '}S: 1'[11111". 70111 %Virl- S, LOS_.... ........ _ ........ ............. ... 50 -vice .......................................................55 I'miAL 1't11.11C _7(0:j `'\ ld.Uffl F;0:C.- InIcrsection Level of Set 1'°i )1e 30: Ful -IIS 2039 Willi Pic-�,,7L:, hittNection I -eve] of Service .............................................................57 1 --, -)Ic 31. 1­,iun: "09 PC;1t-1 IOUl- ............... .......... ......... 1-58 1:i'& 32. 1. u I ui. c 20.19 pe:1:�-1 Iq 1; 11 \Va] ......... ........ ............................................. ........ 59 ki dc 33: Imure 20N With - Route 11 and Kuakini Hi0way 1.c#1 -Tum Signal Phasing Alicinatives........................................................... ..................................................................................... 59 1'xle 34: Future 2039 With Project - Route I I and Lake Street Left -Tian Sigiml Phasing Alteniatives,650 I : i �,) I c 35: Future 2 039 with Prqj ect Segment LOS...., - . ..... ....... ....................... ....... ...... _.__ ..... ...... _'. 61 List of Appendices Appmdi,• A Bli., P,c,J:,- Schedule .-.md Vhip Appendix 1� -1-1 lokii- and Peak Pcijocl Fr2fic Comits 2 1')? CO I � Lh U (I I I., S L 5 Retorts F\:,� i i i i.L., k Appcndl.\ I Am;.k• I-, R(,pt.,v. I t.d'irk: I I I W -:hour I'l-q . Appendix L I u: Lu -Q- I i I j1h ConditI011, Appendi" F Al.-J"."I" 1 ulllrkf (2112�1} III -100 (T' 1,m;lv-4_N R,!pt-i-(.� 111o. " l f"'111 Ap_,_-ndix I I Aii,-,1 vsis RL�pk.'ITS I'll-rU I L: 1211-7" I W:11101.17 I'l (.'(1 Ild i rio.)4 I AI�LJI�-,In FLLIUT, (21';_'Lh �%Vfth 'loicL midiLl(:L IV Royal Vistas TEAR 55FA7 inferna6imill I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION K L I 11 1--L,4 I 1 11 ann Ii in T I { 1 t 1• It 113 a 11111.''1 I I I I I :.-.'h : C 111 - :I I IIILII k 1 � I s -7 1 1):1111.: LJ I :I I V as in K on,i (m tic k1hind of I kiwaii. The pronL'rlv k Iw-;Iwd 0,11 1 1:1-,Ik�. w, 1he Queen K..L;111Hnanu jj'I,,Tjj%{'jj~r (Routo I I ) ai I v1 01) 7-6-411-,)l :wf), 17 belv,(�,,i Kona Vi-i,i 111c1 Only 0 n t. L, 111 -.11' 11 t-ovi & , i c i,,: -;,; for Phasc I of t I i:,' I 1 0: ItIl QUeen KLIiLhAIMIiffl I HE I C: ")W) ieei 114-1-rl, '%-1111 1%L.c1k1:1I I For this 1.1— X. :11-.1 lvpunpr [I k�. 1; r fCFFI`d -.0 :1-�, I . I '� I ' 1-1. 1 Ll-,� '.y f Al 7114' �:.L'A,vfth this TIAR. lrr �Jinwl, n I I Th(: 1,,-vzkr\od ':"k/AWL�, Lvk:n though ffic no% 1ti .]:N:) 0TVI.: U 111 1, c L 1---L 111 111 ied as Phase I . Ph :v�c I 1w rxpeonl lu olllplti�,: 1-1_, Plm-.; will inL [lie 1:1:.I bu [dUtlt Ut ti IL -1113 iiia L) 11=1 10. .hiss 2 is 211 211). 1111: RO'rLld %'1ti4LIS 1)] i1PO!,at C111:1 k:111LI%I- MIL ;)LA I S x110W1 k ? I k Fj -." ffi-c 2. T, Lti i Li,:ii i It d.: , I 1A R iti Lo alid as-:L�:, "AT.wls in the 'mrronod,m-, area aa resul- tv &Lji,-op t: d L,v k` I L "prnCD I COMP �t 11 LT 11 10-. car I'k,'i,L2 coi n 11 horl lit -'G. m 0 fUtI IN C 011d Iii j 1L4 :ll -)S1.3) % Ill ho ami:,. -cj. I L-71111-;.' %', L 11V J ILI 17. %' (I h .)1" 7 1 h tn v a :I -S 01 . 1: C L t x � •w �Y� SOv, ' -�- 4 yy T 1 Project Area y r —L 4- Hot' lvat �} Project Locatio Henry 5 r ` d 'a He OkWai 5t (North] ; :Huadadad St is Oath) rrtamncr mt r. p'uapu avnerg5t h0a0whfi rat? HIS E"kal Mlakir,i Hwy V, Lako 5t �.r KqupehameisQ W Rd 1 tYSafufrr+al Drive 13 NOW KbffVa Drive � sea view cirCie LaWaa Avenue Royal Vistas TZAR 5SFAI infernaiAmIll s � y 4 t :: �a• ;:�- %A Ito 110 w:I:C r� t R Figure 2: Conceptual Site Plan 3 Royal Vistas TZAR II. EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS A. Geometric Configuration 1. Roadway Configuration 55FA7 interna6innf o) Queen Koahumlonu Highway 11 Il. rr !t 1" .171114 ' irk 11'0',:;1 V I'[M' ROZILl'6'71� . Ql'- 4.1 Iw:1;1liumanu I I1!!Ilvr av (Poil1`4• I F I, .11' t: idi'. ",i14•d. mo,-lanr, -):L4•2tN1 in t.it(' is 1:11-•c L11h J'HrI.CliOn. Cit 14 .a1 Ks1_;111.:r :1IL-I I_.At41:(ls IFom KLi1 %ail ;le Roo. : I111 P -I 1.1c 1' a':L11 -o Il,z` :I1Lt:"SLCU01: Wi! l P'cl1;111: R'}.i114ROLL' 1 `! II'.' llt!' I: ;L1.1"tlS' i11=k) ~1:111 R![ JC I !. 11'.-, 17u�,1,1d speed I11'll'I :lstitlz ("),l1' 91 11"..i 11111111, 11Li 111. 11N;',II.' 1:I r'' ','-r1' ,t`-{� I.,1ph. At the fl1:L:IC l''',Iwal V krlthe posted sgee(J Iil:ut . 15 MP[ Queen L4a1:,:11;:17aL'"u I lwj'lV'-aIv opens to 4-5.I:tILc':,%V1-1:J1_:J'1L �'[cdIcfttllr[lLAI 121d:i_':,:rLimir:_ lane -tni jorintersectionc.nt�1-::wc:stoflki11 v`*-1t.t. Rcttte 11 i°°:: liv die v tri,llls llar%1 ;.: L, L1� 1' 111. ,A17i11'1:111L. 1 11'0114'.11'" KLL_ I, :11 i 1 ,,,hway, Mair :1kil- m L1 :SLII R.Oad. Toavoid'ol-A "1011. d w 1.,:111@Rout'e I l will 174 u:, ,c 7l-1't1u hout 2. Study Intersections Tho study intersect oi— :riw11_1d,, the f,!lloning: I. Route l I alld P'_.lau: I::aL: KL'LJt,, I'Jii} a. At thz � loco'. on- kmit�2 I : I< plrN.domlln,)Tltly oriented in an east -west direction and Palani Road I�, prudCJLn1.11j;0 ,�I IL.mk:J Ill a nullll-tiUuth direction. b. Four -h-_- !%; naliMl !I'll,] SCC C_OL1 ~,~.dth (ied.I.e:ated le#tturr[ ng lanes and charulelizedright.turn lanL :LII ;d 11 :i1111rtmk l -1 I:e Reutc. I 1 approaches and the nordibound Palani Road al11,.oiit11 Ini%e f oul,l: le 11 7L1rn lanes. C. All I.i, :I: i.s :ar pn; tiered (have gr, -z- 1 III-Istts). d. The T1,01"17 IL'g Of tI1LIt71{`l5L:0-ion exIL'Ild" tilsld C"11111L:ils m Itll \'1,1"11;11;1 i.+,I 1 Ils'Il'v1 :y (Route L 4 I. ;lllOtheC ; ti :l'-i'l'. Li Ell faculty. 2.. Route l l Lll:,l 111', 4Lrkxt a. At L:II,• .•' ';llit}11- R01.1lt I I 1ti Oritllted I11 all ea'.L-1t CA Lelrt". I".•1:1 xid Hc'lr', ! '.1_1:t21 ,,:- _'1Ih_L1 in A Ii[;1:11- •.rl::I: (11recticln, K Four -h:_ �-_-_,ind17-LLl :fa4'Tti4'tiL:'.'[] i4 a:1 Lk'Jk:LII1'i1 kT l:Ir1::n-,2 ,:id a I:;11::14.11:' J r:}JLr:L-:n laths m' ill approaches, The Route 1 I dr)Pl(l.LLl:L4 :1.1' L 11 •LIl 4 1w:`l 1.111:.d:14'!_. c. La� -. I,Lr. from Ruute 11 onto Iltnr...S1•:m lel-,, k -',. [I Ilk• Iivlr . S•rtiL" L'8.tlier di"., 7 d. The iionllof tl7w It[, Arc �nl(1',I1il h.,.'ti-L]'•1'11;:4: .,411ty. 3. RoLlte I1 4111:] I'.LGII.I .I RL1,141 t \01111) a. At this . rL',,111m, ko( .:e 1 I N nriewlt d in a, north -south dirccijon and 11Hualalai Road is f1;ilFrlt. 1LI Ll[1 . L{I1::rIL?I:. b 141:Lti-1 _:. STOP %1,'.:I e(,ntrolLsl in r;ocfif}n with dedicated lefi turning lades for the T1 DO 1:',II.I1't::IFIC I i,':1If) 0slnc ;LI1131�?:1t".:;. C. 11;111:1:"I':"t'tl I !`I",r 11."11 1;11%,w `1'ti. I() . 117,' ,':ltitht?llLlil -lntl ';0Utl•YboUnd appioacheLs, d- ArLvtl.;',_: 1t1J1;_ Lti I1L't,',:MIL'(', I,}:' LI't . l`.:17L-LILl(1 ..11 -All : L:l L:r-t� ItoLrte 11. 4 Royal vistas TIAH 4. ROWI;« I I Jlld I lHid-i".17' ROLid {""OH.) 5SF11,7 interna6imill a, AE 1111., ov-mmi- I : P, orlemed In a nmth-t;uth dirmfion and Hualalai Road Is b. T L -.Li. ti I 1.) 1, , j.L,: I it I,, I L -d interwetion with dedicated left turning lanes for the S 0 L-. ( ' I -. Nt ) k I I ILI I I :k I '�Ivc ' I )k )L I '.Id ; 11, 1': kIL"J I C' . c, Ch.irvi. I" z(It .t ki --I) I. kr- Iht northbol.1nd. rmd Westbound approaches, d. A r -, I',,�,. - , .. 1:111 c, 1,% lir kl�.k,,- ror the w,.�sthound left turns onto Route 11. 5. Route I I al%J a. At i1r, oc-tzion, Roma I I i,, orkmted in a north -south direction and Puapmanui Street is OrIk2IItL:'1 III ml L:�I 'I: b. Thrl--k4y:. III I', -Jr lh,t n,oiiihkmnd ;iiid Nvestl)(,-Aad ::-')praachl-. c, Thl: �,'UIAIWLII:d lefl ILLI -11 S.1 P1-DLCCtCL1. d Ch'i.ml-dized rtI-J li�-Il j)Zk)% ILICki I'Or 7111t riorlilbolmd m"d 6. At this local i,,,i KOUtC I t JAL-ikinj Iii�li4y„1” a. Ruw,: A is ui I,: nted in Li I ii -SL) Lill] ki H CU 10:1 U H LI KUL&ml I h2171%d V i, U:iClltL`J in an e2st- b, I C)P controlled intersection with dv�dlcattd left tumiag lanes for northbokirc .irid eastbound. C. Chann'--lizCd =11 lanes exist for the eastbound and southbound approaches. d, A r,: lant: is provided for the oa.tbound left turns onto Route 11, e, KI.MkIrli 111�ZIIWLI' 1S a shite-owy3ed raoillry- 7. Route 11 aril I .<i Im '.,t!- c et a. At this :),:.In, ii, Rome I I is oriented in a north -south direction and Lako Street is oriented in an 'fir-Oction. b. Foo -lc-. I I ZCLI :111(;rSCction w I ih dedicated lt:ft turning ]alto;,,,` for each nnproacli, c. Lc',': Ai:i, Ci vri 1,;jurc 1l onto tii! 4� t aro only hitC:1:1 LL: I'Aect .11c:,L CII ROUEC: I I I 11at L).,L:,i 11.1m:d 71)I'.,I41I.-., �. 1 he L u 1, k, S I.,� i.. h I I L: � 1, " I'-.. d ChLini�I:7vd r',1,0v ii:7-i1 I it I c\ 1.,.- I"Or eiii2h Lippt ouc h S. Mae 11 aril K:tmefimiich,III koEll a. At i:uROLITc I I Is o: LUI.: d 1:1 J 1101 Ill 111WA L: 11 '11-d jS 01'ICIII-2d I:, b, Foolr-I L", 1: '11.1 '. I'A. (I I III CT -$Q4' Lit ml 44 It I r I L';; I L ;I I Cd -II 1. 11.1' :11-1L- 'I' I 'I I 'k'l-t I! h I %I .'I. L :111 L 51. 111 ;11 1'-� I I c;' c. Lcf;urns frOM RL) L 11` 1. 1 are :I I 1: 1; 1 1izI n c I i ll I It ni '-,,i 5es are split. Chmi, i L:L,cd r:.0 �( [I'. -r1 ."Iy for 3011il [rid ."ok TIJ J1 1 1 1. Z7 21.i I :li%. ir;il 1wi, )l%- -,r:d (:t)TiLnflj :t[ dw kAL,I- IIIL�L y,CCLIA,k':II M I 5 Royal Vistas TZAR 5SFAI infernaiAmIll LeR2 n_d lomrsecti411 4 r =";'-- U Intersection SGtk sign Figure 3: Existing 2019 Lane Configuration 0 1111111 -:—#k Royal Vistas TZAR 55FA7 inlernaiii3nal 3, Pedestrian Facilities i I k, m,, 1'.iovided on each corner o' Road -iid Heil rY Strcct. A fl. i� iron ided on ili-, S1.1 I (-'I ;ILI i k! I I lY, I it: I I bLn\cL:ii I" k I: iii I Rom I md Wiln err CC[ . °LLIC�k 1-1111 411L %Rl% -Cd "I) bUli I mdc�~ L't PL I'!!, I L"i -,-I I, II S' I C": I I 1:? _rIo" I k.` 1 .1 L: AIS I I I I L I seci 1011 \N 11,11 ROUle I I T 'Lt I k intk:rwcoori ark; shown in I-Igurt: 3. 4. Bike Facilities Nl_i:LJ I)Ikk: Lmt:;ir,: on Route I I at I kmry SnLm ,md not-rh. There arc' m) ILIDLCq SOL.1171 t'. ]&, There are bike lames L11i Litko S71-eet eZlql Lrj It,,)Ute 11 7(5 1 It ,174ddj Rli'wd or. 111-, 1' tl;lic marked shoulders along Route 11 in 'hc ciiidv 1';11'0�' 't%lil, '' "C-:1 I.,,. D S. Bus Stops and Bus Routes I :1' I I Icic-or, NIS) tj1)Q',M -I 1.;IVL: bl.I, '0111L 1; 1'.:11 1 -.1 : lilt- K' oi._ IL ;,L) Illi CL�AAA�%.. ury K�'.:lu ol:Lwillis I- , tll� I ii%m Kona hi�s i'OW,' ,er, t' I jS jI_.LI . C, \,I 10 8:30 %1011.111� W '51:11.,rduy_ Appk:ridix A lrtchidQy th4 dCl ;.,l I 0.d 1-1 FP I It C �Cll _'d I I I ti: -IT-. L I 1'.1 A Illi rol Ite B. Volumes 1. Vehicular Volume 0) Rawhvqj, Traffic Vol ume8 BistoilcnI a%.oruge 41:1,, Lraffile (ADT) aTid reek h01-117 VOIIIJTTCRi.-I 11 L! I I Ill '.LI' I v .11-_:' 11-c II bi fable I. I"he ADI is brised on 11awAi DOT tr,,iMc ccL1I1E_, lr4:1I.1k'C11 P) Table I : Roaidwa,,' TI'AfW X 011.11111eS Roadway 1 Lo tion I ADT FA 11 Route 11 Between Nani Kailua Drive and Hualalai Road 25,800 � - .2 't1 f1 25,900 1 0 15 Source: Historical Traffic Station (HDOT) The 24-hour traffic volume distribution along Route I I (gee Figure 41 at the traflic count. 5t„Boll Ion shows a variation in 'travel patterns throughout the day with PPTOT111MMI mornim..! .ind anomoon coisimitior peak periods. Deta i I ed 24-hour counts are ine luded in Appendix 3, A1I C ? I, J' 111 r, li,” r I ( im I n rcA, lw, ir ,\%,I VC,'C I I . - ' ]�ui 11o. I r I, �l I I 11- cl, -lorl"llvill."I .'11:1 %,Pll I ILIC11114:Jtld JOr !i roal A' 1.84.."% Fhllnng til it 1-11(':}]1 our Of 1� PM. there wLk� LipI1,j-ox.j'itr,:-!%, 914 vpli -.1nd I ri ;-I L! I I ,i uT1 i bound f 61 a t (I ta 1 of 1,931 vph Royal Vistas gam \ / \ C. Ln Volume (vehicles «fh_Q Figure Route 11, \■ni K wlUa Dr to H Bala|a w Rd, 2 Hour Volume Distribution Rn|M a Royal Vistas TMR SSFN7 in[ernatii3nal b) 1:.4ixiin 'r' Y lP t{'i'S'f't: lr,f! 1'va4 1aemi- Volunw.k `d';IIt.;ll '1;1 I, >[' Iur:I_t:4 [7:'F'.C'Lllt_',lI I "Ii:ik c,,,aw4� takeiiat the eiehi studyir.tc.r ectinll : ] i 1 t111tq Ir::I.im R. -.Id =) Rt'Ltt,' : I .md I ltr::% S-ri - 31 Rk-k.�, 1 I and 1I.:;I.iI:1i fti0,rt1 i11011:1:. 4) ROLL(,' I I i,tlil .1,L1 l Cr�lCl ( t.'trtl I.. } I:c�;tl� I 111x3 l'18i.1F^1�:1 :ntli lig^t'., r)j I i`tltt I l illd h •I.L: :1i .li,_I ,.,1'., ti It{ I:L` _.1k0 Streei, ai1Ll Itc wr . I 1 ill,,.I Kaniellall:thit 1I1 1t'd. 1:-+, untswere c(il_t :.'c' tit _s:iL la.' : c;tk Ij ric7�1:, ;:l l 11:,Nday, April 3 1 20. `.1 and l ursday. i11- is- _''.'. _'`.' _ `-' Ut"ttlE illi JULI1 J LiLI'll;t1L:':•1) 1'1: til:ltl s, heavy true zH:4t '�:LTI ..',I t.I:s' i=i!l^.'I Ji::i:Llt IOU %i11k1l:li:i a]l' �Ii1F111i il: 1'i '4trw 5, Ds;laiI�:d 1)L:,:I, _,Lnoj 4 totints avlw iLitll:fjCJ in ,'jIpQn- :.N H. 2. Pedestrian and Bicycle Volumes 12omk' 1 1 1, a fr4q,i," 1111 i 4;[ 1:1 11 i1 r';111L• 101.:�;:1rIlIctesand otliQ, cvdlits mid has regular- bicycle I'L['Fl1'I`V 7 ;i]le 11 5':1e '010 'Y',I0Tl'1.1'1 '`-'1�' li'.t'tic le i'it -he tab;er;'eCl jieiieStC'tati activiry Vii: ll'I'CL13T illi +' '�71C'Qt. 131C'WI, i;?'_ll`ri1,-,'121' in rill' i._rir rk,-m rile I'M puak l'oun Detailed lac.^.k 17;21-i..lri and c.7L11:'.i ._rc i1, R_ T;ihle ?: Lxislirl;, 21.119 Pedesti-hin and Bic}.Jke N (Turtles Intersection Queen KGGahumanu Hwy n, P.-ilan1 Rd M F'= 1 Bike -1 3 _Ped Bike 3 1 Quu'ec) <aahuman u Hwy & Heni St 9 4 12 4 Queer) Kaahum,anu Hwy & Hua ala; Rd (N) 0 3 a 1 Queen Kaah manu Hwy & F-lualala; Rd (5) 0 4 0 0 Queer K ahumanu Hwy & Puapuaanui St 0 2 i 0 Quer•I S.ah:llrnanl.l Hwy r; K11;:I<ini Hwy 0 2 0 0 C)uec" { :�A,.Irrini,j I kvy & I,1k-� St 1 2 0 Quocn K�,ahullnal_,U ld%vy & Kan,cIliameha III l 10 I a r RO Royal Vistas TZAR 5SFAI infernaiAmIll —ep--d It Anatytrd Ptak HUur VOI4 MPS � YInahzed � unsignalized IN rntersem on � � AIV! (PMI (veh. rj `��/ Intersedion �,_./ Intarsertion P �� Figure 5: Existing 2019 Peak Hour Volumes 10 Royal Vistas TFAR 55FA7 inlerna4!ii3rillf C. Traffic Operation Analysis 1. Level of Service Methodology J I OF '-'P, IL'. )",:IN IT1 :!11:11YIs7-111ing "Y',lum III 11 -Al lic c`ngimeenng to in('.amirc th,:, ATO.- I I-, -C-j I � S z :78 L'o I I I I w i I q I I I I or-: V I icr_- :]I..: h-wriArol', LOSA II ti 1 4111" 'A"I�L" 11tik, or 1S I' lAncdas Xcmc: dcl_iNs exl^:i Clk..Alc'wc� IFL)m the (.,,r 7 o III, 1? F I 1:cj d C."r .1 11 CI' k 5n n.L� r". C 7A110n 4 Section 4o -h',i :m '-Accc,,),:ib-,: k'vk:', Wk:- )m 11e levcl f110111V :i: LIM. I a,cl l'%I peak hou� is "D" Or 1--, [tc-_ . Lc,-,:. or LOS. A Cll',Jljt{&Ve lllw l tu4 demt[,_Lbing .1pL2­,ltwI)aI CE ildilioilC w [. I L 11 a 1.LLfl'j1: ':LLJ be L.y._-IIL' the t)J-OCCCILIP�-., Ill Ill--' ki.t,".-A -(1 11 Ld'llk: ll'3g1MX, C':1 )Ac I n I I i­.�r w: 1, '' I I ik lm -L .:1::1" .LLI 'ori LOS . r -k I 51.-I: x. \1vt c 1 101- tljw V�11 :! W '."Vll ')-AY'� 13'IIW iire sx15� ::'UjyO_d using _101W LLCII&WdOIOa LCI;. A� �f:ited Ill the M,,,hwq.Y Caparfli, Manua! (HC Aft 6" Ultion (TRB, N116), LOS for a two-way stop bv zhk_' mk,.r,m-.-d comro' lAlc Mk: L� ' J, -.r,- ,,%'T wo�-Cjnk:lll Ud%-,�'.M� )10,1111 Elie '[ 'A ( I : I t ( V, 10i mirii-xil 5lcla, ,i L I:i% Li: !ill. Tho -,e dIJI.- ',ipp­f -11� :i1 1 1,),: 11 1: Ir m0vt:r-wn1, iire ',51711-C Jw l 0)" :1 �11,11 :Wl A111I 1111,N' !111.1 :MLLI -I" I I! 1111L, A' 111 1 N roA thL'. gnlp Table 3: LOS Criteria f'or L cisignalized liih?rtieetionN v rage Coil I I-IIII P� ".1.0 .0's by %. , "e A 1, d 15 D t 47 ti t is F -'Ind F 1 .... -�. (1 72 S o ti rL c: 11CA I ( T R B, 4'016) The LOS aiialy,sIs for sigualized inter,;wlom4 is based on average total vehicle delay basiM on the mcilhodolkL,.(-, ol' iliNC�.: � FRB. "1)1(3), w, -;howTi M 1 4 t,,:. [ Ew HCm �� (11rh1r, -.15 "Xi'l "uppol '114 anakc,]� r4'i1=1 [�•)rli ti.\Cl C 1 111 n 7. [)L)SO cf,s s, rn mh [ do-L) i o, :'I- w. I [+ 'NI k :'[113. 0 001 a I. ustici. Forth's 1rcit--1,, `.iudy, thC ROUIC I I ciMi I' [Crll-L SIFCCCi will lr,: [It,: 211o'1 I IC %1 11willuctok)Ly. 1) 0 t 11 C 1' 11 LI re Of i i t i o n (I e I ay is the vo I 1. r i)'- t<) C "I ].),I C i ty (VL =;tti; 111 i t 11 ti' -W:(, 0- T IL::A 0f 1'.1 ffi U - 11. 2 i 1) Ill C ] I S [,21 -:,: t tion u n -, pa r4 ,.-, to -1, a\. I I lu �1 I -Vo 11 11 " le of VCM 1L C=:'1 1,: Co I, L I Li : C b , V1lCl­.,C1 on CIL,]— I '.4_, a I 111C p,!I­,)kL A 1-'C --,Il li L1IId_­ I- Q'Lli)� t'l- I Ill,: :-'CLI, 1, LL, 011,tI'dll 'Iff L'A[Ct' I1­,2­-_-,:-k1u11 is k1l",�1:,J r.: nenr its When N -./C 1':.1_101­11tl5'k,: :1:111,1 0.85 to 0.9j. I'_flows ;11,., when the wc iLil o,:(ween 0.95 and 1.0. A 11 Royal vistas TIAH 55FA7 internaiii3nal 1' LOS but 10W V. 1:1,"I ;H'_,': C-.:, IhAi 11 L' 1�'AIYIL ll':;l niovii,-ment, are Io%% "Lji I rk-,i v, :11 1 fle 1.1"'. i:OIWVCII i,!,. ov, vol 11.1v protected left -tum ll: -i niovti,mcivs or siLk AfCt17S All 1111USt W;I t :hli_L)Ilgh 8 IlOng CyCle 10IF:Jh I'OT 111011 SIDfit to come up. Fable 4: LOS Crilei­Li Im, 41,_,nAlized llntcrwciion,� Averagt Control Delay I 41S bv V{c Ral-110 1_00 b". Milki, <=1.0 1 ".0 A I 1 <20 B >20 and <35 C F `3 -,I I it] � 5 _L) 5 -flId -No L F ."0 F F SL ii j i ;71( I I' (T R P,, 10 16) kVhcrc ignall'y.0d ;tri' 1. x, Ill -in :tparl, the fac]l.Vv 0-HmId he ns, an orb.in wiW 111,.: 11.10 1 il, 7,.:1 h:ri I ;I Aitic , I.I ICM. ( ".-:III-,,`: ' r, j 1 (yr L; 113: i I I- `hl�_ [,: irl"O k`' :,l)L:.:k1 I) III,& Ill dl!,Ilk Z_, 1 .()� TIll,, p,2.2, thc 1111,. :'. Id Ill C 111L,1Ir"A:kl h', T I' P 1: % L: I 1w I C., '11 C',Id I.-: Thl's pell . oFI11,,,l(:e131e4LLLre iULtI.(:a1e1, the JcgP'_dic lacikt4,- 2. Existing 2019 laterscction LOS Extyr�tin , intersex lion and mo,kcairmt LOS and 1�+iw (insecondpervehi,,IL' i ",L':0 klL'Ik'rIlI IW11 I'M the A%-11 and I'M peak hcqHs. Table 5 slier; rl,� :\Im i:- wlii�uhu d -I -!,v ;-ii,'` .:v,:l ill at k: -:,:h [Ilk: 0: NVOFNCJFC111211114111121.1 :11 11:11ov, S"%lick-ooll(p.11 14 '1 A-rcl-dix C. a) Route 11 and Polani Road. overoll in rersection LG,S = CIC (AMIPM) All 1710Ve1Ijejjr1°L ;II 711L' ,IS'JIJ;,7Ck1 1117L'F�L, 11:11IN 0:' Rklk.::' I S% H1 PJ.111 VHilil I,, nprol-`jxD )-S D 01, 'd Md peall- hcmr~, b) Route 11 and Henry Street Overcrif Intersection LOS --- CIC(AMIPMI -,w11-,_I1zcd of :i;., 115` I }l Hli I lciit,y Strectrestilted in appropriate LOS 0 :1-- kclil-r V%1 iii�i PM 11c:ik kow', C) fioute 11 and Hualaiaif Road (North) At I?ic I?c6 In-,�:j .,i Koutc ! I -,� ]Ili I hm.�ihi I SLi I Lor (I , I, K:�,[ Till JIL11- 111ovellIent C, �7- bas LOS F (vii i -ii- i., I 21ld I L:pcvtivelv) 211,j 411:1 :ILr [-..,111 � V a11d VM 11,fak hciuos are due Lu hi pli i vk 1 i Lm -s ;iii Th C T11.1 ill I ;11_1: 01 Ilk's I ' I I 1 ;I'- 1 1: 1 % L' 'IlCrI iQ m wd ai. :Lv:k:cputble levcls Of service dul-in., r 1?.c .1"0 :. nd I'll I7ti;5 k PL r1: 1. Royal Vistas TFAR Table 5: KxiOing 2019 Intersectinn Level of Service 5SF147inlernaiii3nal 1"Mmerd" Delay (iedvvh) AM V I jOF-la+y PM fsmcyv.h) Vic Los RO L -. F- L1. k P31a rjj Rd (QW. Fj$1 1 23,7 c =4 1 i 74 --7 c D a L =1 = L,'t 38.6 0145 D I 14,1 0.30 B I I- 38.9 0.67 0 72 D P r-11 P. TI h 37,4 .2- Ro utf Ll F. Ap r ry St p i a I 11 31.8 0.112 32.6 0 (�5 c I(::1.:' L :I 'd j. I I c 1?7:1tq 14i Ls .9 . . . "it . ..................... . . . . . .. ..................... . .. . ....................... Q0 . . ;. . . I F;Hr rn ugh D 37,1 0.% Herr% Ri�1ht SS Route 11 9 HuAlalai 1N) joverall) I. I L.I. 3 D03 ------ - - c - - - - - ------------- 32.5 '34,:_3._ - - - - -4.2 0 02 73 61 c D R;. m. r :!1 fJ 9 fl 10.8 012 0 8 I : -i D; -o - EC L-2 Rome 11 & I lu'dalai (5) (Over -All) KO u:---- '-I 53 ILL 429.0 3.3 1.31 F H 1107.3 1.7 0,23 F LD.S 0 r"S., Li A jA;; i A% I RI.'. F 1 1 7.d RoAc 11 & ftapuaanui St {overall) 9.7 A 9.9 - A R 11 S �3 J_C -t 60.4 U 7_ E 53 1 0.81 D HJUIO 11Wb I S.3 D.:30 A 3.0 O.:,f A '.�M i FF: t 11,62 F P Hcu,,e 11 & Kuakimi (overall) ,I NL' e IL YJ i.;'.6 ----------- 12.1 0.33 3 Rome -11 & tjakn 5t 30,6 c 211 c Rc,u,.,. 1 14'8 .C., II. N ij ;I F.: I N I r':4 a c ILS t.&S .15 014 0 ?el 0 11 a Ci B R I 7h Fuiu gh - E L;r :1% nrojLh Rihi I w. I A LV IF L jr, 0€>3 0.883 3.16 5 E r 20.1 u 82 44 LCI 76 D 357 7 D D 11 R. L -1 "1' a7.7 75 [1 I-v:k A 'U I, R I I. $1. r. a LS I I F I 'm:i-t, K �'-,VBL�mm �Jl 10.3 320 4LA 1 84 L L' 13 Royal vistas TIAH SSFAI Infernaiii3nal d) I? a u to 11 and H uclulair Roan (So u thl At the ur, iiii I ritci y,cu oji of Route 11 witli [ [:-!.I I a`,i Poid isow,.t, the westbe-und left turning TjlovemL�l fiati L(]) I i %.. .- •:r1 0 [ � and 0.11 IVSPM1V[_, 1 .111J IIIc 'A 11J J "III tam operates, at LOS E Cv C o I 11.11 A 1V1 [,Qtl 1, 110 1':'. 1 1 J,: I:P} � 1.1. 11 I'lr N 11 l til :Al Ll 11 �d pcAk, hours are due to high tl110tl_`I' OF III)" 1- .11; 101' I 1'4'11": ;:Ir acL,L:prable lowls Df VVI 111,1 PM 11�!,LL IPIL-1_ e) Route 11 and P[ upuaanui Street Overall intersection LOS= AIA (AA41PPA) ],7t afl-,l lk a_I-n r-l'-L'Illeuts operate at LOS L 4-v/c of 0.-,' 1-1d, -,3�S, dura i_, t)c li, v;'IwidA !,L ft tmopeiatk�k pit LOS L of'i.021 "uAng the j%:iil, kolLr, The 1cft iurn Il.;: --ld ".luO'l dcar CNYeL,,- 11V .,d%TAI 71:_11:1,' - ,11x1 c, upi i I d be :1(jj U S Ged Z L) L -If, L 11. c 11111.{1.1;'.1 t :. 1V If i I t!S I I LL f) R u u te 11 and Kuakin If Highway AT A-j� 1 - L I Jill) ement I- ofl0tite I I .�,_Ih Kiwk1i Iii�, o;-isthctLw-1 1 -ft tw-1- 11 .1 Li, all LOS F l c oI I (I . -u I till l lk-m-, (AcIav-, 6 LILU I'-' i'011 I _'% M :1' I d P "I I [,"•,Ik I I OUd Lie 1, .11--li 1111 -ow -'ll 011 -W'ItC 11. 1IlL'LIVC 1AI1'_:7' HILIlUl" MOVAlllulls L)PCVUI�L] ill Ike :VVI -rl.l I'M rc7nl, koL, x. 9) R o u te 11 and L a ko Sheet. 0 vera 11 intersection L 0 5 = CIC (AMIPM) At 1,, 2 s l ,11,1 7 c c i 1,i I4 I:11:111 111,: 1 1 I.:.� o 411 L, L: C o I I ]I t Ltfl tuns ore raw s at L Os F (SIC dill -jou :PIU AM pC',1% _XU I:11, lk-'d\ LI -.Z,' III0i ,&,.hounL1 :U[I) :hl I'1;- 'tL:I- . - - Liil,o oper,,,:L!, -La I U ur spik 131 ::i 10: �IIU 1 --0 SIIL!�.!( djl]MU, W:N. ;U I: IL-1 biuc F Lt Lig- I i 1,il' IN' 1. 1 1 _. ": i11% : 10 ILL] �. h) R o u te 11 and Kamehumeha III Road T1w ovu:311 lu LOS 11 2nd (.'. Ior ilio Ai mt] 11\1 -:iL:.ik 'ioui,,. All ill illi IID ei,eaion orRotite i I A111 \All'thl HZ -11_ Ill RP:)1. __t�lltekl 1-1 L () S I) u i- 'Jc v r J ui i I ij AN -1 -,i r tj [I [VI peals ljcjiy!;. 3. Existing 2019 MItigation 0) Traffic Sigrnal Wcrrant Analysis lk,w- .11.kl 1'�� I-1 lour lr,tl , 1W 'X:!n-.,l!1lL� WCrC :il rK- x_LI.Cl k:l: 1.11 Ill 1ILII0 R0k.IL: I ' OA'lz k: it LOS 7' kl( JICOk' ]I0H:'N_ 11 ShOUI(I :'!`i IAML74£ til -It Illtiti Ill L 1 IL' 1 '.:1 I'jaVe a I'-- I H I :i I -I,-- oili Rou.-•,e I.1 N1,1iIL'h ., 110:'� iti'_'lll.'' 1111.1 S) nchi-o ancl 11-ereibte the I 11;J11 thk :il I c I I kL I Cd dt: I } I v 'i I ;i�` hQ I 'ca�k- I 14:rLiir WAI T. In, I l."n o1 a 'good v,-_wther or not a traffic siunal C.1f.-III 1", 111,4"l-14"kI H: tl­settinii. llowei,:r. it :S heing evall,liated a;iI:l Al l)nlv as all indicator oj'�Ahc.i �_iould Lit T h e ni -1 r or ,;I re L Ic r k I, - n 111 tf I j 1tr i I tti r 1'+ 'I'. I I L I I L I I i: I R I I, I t I inly .,c,:r6, i i s ;11,11 K ki a k ini H 1,gh y operate at I,ig, buiri hours. For ilit4rse4'i or,,, iv ri i iiiii- lei'-' I ui;i, w-; re U:sA fur t11L, ininor sficet itppioach, The 11'laloI ar.pi (!,!,CIL was [I.% d 'tun Of rll:; ;1110U' -ll VOIUML;11_1_1 -11C left toms liom Route I I . Rl�111 kill I I I ill1proaclit" -Iorn 1110 allaly,lx- s"Ulct! 111L, I 1LI1:1IS' enter the roadwav uih mini ll 1. 14 Royal Vistas TrAR" 5SFAI in[ernaiii3nnf Fort lie Four -flour �%;v-rarfl, FI �vji-l: 4C-2 L%lI : TC DI r3,,: cl �,int•k: fliu 45 N1 N1 1 131.ssbe d -,pc cc[ Ili n iI on Rotue. I 1 is over 40 MP1-l. The • 2 or riione Lzin:�K & I l..LlI;t"- C1I1-Ve %%: [Nw t(l for r>.imNsIs. Table 6 show, the Fnur- I lour warrLlnt analysis. Table 6- Four -Hour NVarrant ixas .d on 21119 traffic volumcs Existing - Hualalai (N)4 --Hour Warrant Major Minor Warrant? 6:45-7:45 AM 1925 44 X10 7:45-8:"5 AN1 175:3 2 V0 3:.97 4:00 -_1 I'll i.012 fid N0 4:�)il .9:00 Pm 1842 14 NO 1.2-1~:0101 'M 1767 7 Nn E 4-1i (]rVia, r_►n I Major M'.no-- tiVcvrint? 6:45-7:45 AM 1524 9 VO 7:45-8:45 AM 1763 C, NO 3:00-4:00 PM 2014 14 NO 4:00-5:00 PM 1900 4 NO 5:00-b:00 RM 1835 3 NO G:z15 7:.," 5 Am 2f547 c' l() 7:45-8.451,1 1 7r 4 \10 :00-4:001 ' Iv'I 1979 14 N CJ 4. J-1-5-00 M 19-nS 14 NO -6:0C, M 1719 5 NO Forthe Peril; -I €utn wavr int,1=igurc 4C-4 (MUTCD),,v:i-s ;irwc rl c I � x.11" I I"[ >;_%'d wl,ck-Ll Iinrit on R[lute 1 1 i,: over 40 MPH. The -2 or more Lanes &. 1 Laae" cul've was used tat' aii,!.- *r�,. 'Fable 7 slwca Ls the Peak - 1:10111 Ws 1.17a1lt J11J1vL,i11,- Table 7: Peal. -Hour Warrant htrsctl nn 20141ra111C tolutttrsi Mir or Road Major AM Miner Pct ik Hnur Warr�mt 1r1,"arrant? Major RM Minor Warrant? Hualalai {Hj 1925 44 € O 2012 10 NO Huaialai (5) 1,514 9 NO 1563 14 NO Kuakini 2051 7 NO 1394 13 NO Norw of Ric three unsignalMcd iw r�ct:tion� �.,01.�Ik' Ilse 4-1:1oi[roi- I'v do I Iotjr-fr.lf?fi SigmiI Warrant. 'A Peak HOur warrant was evalrrzlted to give an indicotdnn of whether or not ;in intr:rsection . Mould by considcrvd and monitored for a traffic signal_ 15 Royal vistas TIAH SSFM Infernaiii3nal b) RaFfFidahout A n ah wb; -it!] Hillakilai Road ind KlItakini cwi�mto ;1I Chlor sllrL�� 1,::� j110V1N11Ct1t1;1' it K LOS F 1.1.1.1raig bulli 1,-,:;ik 11k:LH I ('I 1.11C ,2 tlic tl',1: ['C ,:k'•l ::j 7 k I I' it -,'1.L 1,1: C I k I. I I LLL I I M.1 werL: amlyied (sQv I :Ll- I I. V - i� 1`1 11 [l:.1:11:I N o: I k: -ill QT-ti3O'T �.11 l*I'l'k Minor 7 1 1 J� I ' 11 ''11,31-05,x,-; I LOS B ur better. hov,,ever, �Ile,Conte I I aq%ri,xi-,,h L()k-J�rl,,initL:s to LOS C :): LOS D, 1"L'Auni Ill-Inway, Itic overall delay irjciL;Ii�,:Ll -1,111 -.7 sicoi-,ds to 7.5.6 fi:-:ii Cconds to 214.7 4ocond-.; W the ANI and PNI 11,:,I1.wo. The Route I I �:,p!oadic-k -,,. :11 ai. -..0's F Wilh V OV4�111- 1.00 in ;1kC A -N1 p�;.k :ioil. 13WC 8: LAAS611[-, Romidal)fPcit Aual1.sis al Unsignalized C) Ahcrijaiire 11ifillotion Iletisfire.s : 1 1 1 11 1 --,11-,,, - -,I I- .,I. -k I, ri Roa (I Tit- 11.1d". -LLP P-lUd nqjit tul-11 operate5 at LOS T tIlLI-Mg t1le ANI peak liour, An i-k-,ki !orr, unro northbound Rourt: I I would rcmovc the conflict at the flD.-, sim.hj i,., -,ILL:i IA,:L,,:ctiL)nson the Route 11 corridor. I :jk;i Sil-o.,l 1111-1, jllm�,Ing for fliI-An Street :..,proach. A comparison sliut� in,, ilic Lh1-fL'1rCM [Cfl 4dM JAAWL4Llill 011 Laku Sixo l`, w 1;1x11: ji T,!. -)I 4.1. Prf,le�ed left turns on Lako Street will provide a slight impro% In rh,, c-, ;- nP but the eastbound Left will still operate with LOS E. The other alterriatiVeS -Wi I- jNvVtJ,- J,,c-LptAlle LOS for ailmoveinents. The City and County of Honalulii'i Tn.-rlfic As5esswenf.fiyr .' .,,?fl -Turn Venal Phavrng (ATA. y111 r e c o i i i I i I1 :J,, I 11 1 fi., T- a P P r o 1: C I 10 Li I ,11 k, I I I 111;11, `1 1 11, 1; 11, 4- e� I I, 1-k j I l _ i I T rn P 1i sboljkl lie Col,--kk,IA. "WkI a 11lzrLc i� lloi. �,!,Alt dk(JJWC SI)OUld I °�-- ::k:J—'L1 t",:l 1 1: : :01.116,1 J LOM I r. 2 1 ICI I 1In;,Y0: IL:. :-1 [,'1Ii 11. 1 ILC' ,l lj,:lkjji" U1 Rutite I I fl-oni HCILF% 11! 1%1mm.:F1,Lij:Jrj J11 i� iLrcdc,: 111 211-24. ArA �3 NJ LOS De I ay I see lvete ) Vic LOS Routs 11 N Hu Fi I Fi I a i (N1 nvtLaIFL_ 77.,1 U DC G 79 C I C1. I your I S3 aparqa-:1-:f 1•u7 :i'a' %--orth EB :ippr- ach Route 11 & Hua I a I a i I, S) ove r di 1 3L A A C ij 17.2 15? C 3 C 'A", appfc-,-, h WB 1. 0.39 El 193 0.84 9 0.18 A F. E -KK F. Ku@4dni (overall) 75.15 F 24:7 C Fi C? I i N8 a rr �h e 1 tis,1r F 195 [}$5 A& I K u n p 13 1 0.75 D C) Ahcrijaiire 11ifillotion Iletisfire.s : 1 1 1 11 1 --,11-,,, - -,I I- .,I. -k I, ri Roa (I Tit- 11.1d". -LLP P-lUd nqjit tul-11 operate5 at LOS T tIlLI-Mg t1le ANI peak liour, An i-k-,ki !orr, unro northbound Rourt: I I would rcmovc the conflict at the flD.-, sim.hj i,., -,ILL:i IA,:L,,:ctiL)nson the Route 11 corridor. I :jk;i Sil-o.,l 1111-1, jllm�,Ing for fliI-An Street :..,proach. A comparison sliut� in,, ilic Lh1-fL'1rCM [Cfl 4dM JAAWL4Llill 011 Laku Sixo l`, w 1;1x11: ji T,!. -)I 4.1. Prf,le�ed left turns on Lako Street will provide a slight impro% In rh,, c-, ;- nP but the eastbound Left will still operate with LOS E. The other alterriatiVeS -Wi I- jNvVtJ,- J,,c-LptAlle LOS for ailmoveinents. The City and County of Honalulii'i Tn.-rlfic As5esswenf.fiyr .' .,,?fl -Turn Venal Phavrng (ATA. y111 r e c o i i i I i I1 :J,, I 11 1 fi., T- a P P r o 1: C I 10 Li I ,11 k, I I I 111;11, `1 1 11, 1; 11, 4- e� I I, 1-k j I l _ i I T rn P 1i sboljkl lie Col,--kk,IA. "WkI a 11lzrLc i� lloi. �,!,Alt dk(JJWC SI)OUld I °�-- ::k:J—'L1 t",:l 1 1: : :01.116,1 J LOM I r. 2 1 ICI I 1In;,Y0: IL:. :-1 [,'1Ii 11. 1 ILC' ,l lj,:lkjji" U1 Rutite I I fl-oni HCILF% 11! 1%1mm.:F1,Lij:Jrj J11 i� iLrcdc,: 111 211-24. Royal vistas TIAH SSFAI inferna6imill I AbIV 9: F-AiNtill"' ( "fillitiOn Ito tile 1I and Lako S I I -L -CI L Uf I -I m -n Si,�anal Vfiasiw4 Al I ern at ives -1.,-1P R)LJrP 11. Prr)tpc-tpd I Pf7 Tum SiHral Plias;ngun tA-w Sr -met ArA PM DVIc-.'Y LD% bV 1,;Y f 3 VL/ve h) V/C LOS Pomp I I & Lako5t(overall) PoLvI 14L 21.7 c 12.9 B POU7C 1 40 gh 1.;.1 6 WS 75 B FCA IIq.S 067 c :C 59.9 0,88 F -11.' 75 D R 1, 1 oil 0. ENS I D I'P.r. 036 L: 41..' D Z Lam Rcjut,, LI, LrfI Tum Sigr-,2 PI-as'iigcn Law AM 'Im Delayf5echch) VIC LOS Droknv [sc,/vch) "Ic LOS IROLI U 11& La k o S1 overa111 22.1 c 15.1 a i r ,j B n = -2Si 92 Oil 2" A 1 A I c c U =rJl I.'.,;, L •: I,1, a 13.8 w -: B k IV;,,.!:h P I .'; -------- c 35,6 C, 51 D C, 2- LaAP Roul u 11. I'm k I P4i ri m Li' I L Tum Sigral: P Ii as'n g on Larj ,-�SlfQ L, t De I ov 15 erjv hi ArNI Y/C LOS Dekw I sLc,'veh) J3PA VIC Vus ROLIte Ii & Loko S1 joverall I 2E.6 c 19A I IV I . 'P I r.I I j i.- I; B -H 077 1 1 1 _Ilk - 'i 0.20 L C. -,g D 1.3 - c 7 D 4 Lane P a ule 11, S1. 1 Pho s i n go an -ZikO Streel OF lay f b L-Cfwe h I AM VA LOS DOAV f.,eL/vi-h) M Y/C LOS ROU tC Ii E4 Laka SI i ove ra I I 1 19.6 B 14.9 8 kuu Ea 1 Rol'Ie I! sr3 k.! k ............ — -------- T - 1 P.0 U -- 0 1 LI P h ral 43 ft ..... . . ..... 0 009 . 0.67 . . . . ........................... 6 ................... 14.8 1 A :2.7 0.42 9 9-8 A 14.5 0.49 9 273 0.10 c 13.0 f" - 1) 27,5 B c B hra Fl7-P, L3kID "i-, o?f; 1.4m) I ri)!.j.T.i, k:u,Ei! 70.2 '30.4 27.1 0.15 0,57 us c c c 217 215.1 2.4 ,3 I::c C. c c 17 Royal Vistas TIAR SSFAI inlernaiii3nal Future (2024) Near -Term Conditions— Completion of Phase 1 I,' 111 L'O.1 I L' I 1 :1 111 - 1.� I % :,I I Il I I I r" , Is 1. 11 Li -, e I 1.I co1 i."1111 I"vol 1 11 1 JI I I I k 1 7 IjL- 11-11 1)0111 ()t' Wk%'!�I I 11:` I:1 L' RI :i:, Irk .ik I lvav interstcung ii -i kt!uiv 11 Aloor i10 7"44'1 rorth ot 17,- K ;i k 1 n i I I A Surrounding Arca Developments hl!C�',l Were narched and analyzed to asst:',:, 711,'%1 i'LLN11V '11`AL 1 4111 14,1;1k xkl 11111c: developrilt1I' MV -,X[ILTI,`L1 Ill he ~urrl1l11 Iirill I i: I I V,ti.IIki si,e,r 1'i .'111 1L' I: '_'W Ely I I 1`11,`,S Or I Tafi, '. vo I I I I i Ic al 1'oL I I I,X I I(,:I' i ,I,. K---,�d oril re-�.,iirch ooi-,irlil'icd m 2 9 iI. E the I _. L' I IX0 ill I ( H`lct, I- I Q Ll; IV (•.1111 QC) WU-)l': C. I. Living 50nes Church _[.`1L: I '.Vii -L' S'01_, ^ t I"'.11'J' I Ck: LL,:LJ Il, -'.III QI I'l :;Puairlul Siivo, jui i..)rl I i (d I k -,A1_i.J1l:l 'Ili I Ili; L 1' .1 'ch to 1-1 "'111) ,Oijf-: 4,. Ll h Q :11ior aiv.i tSF GFA�, AL: o 01 t 417L 1111111'.. 20P') -Ilk: '^U:lkkl% hr,lific L? ilertite,! . �j I h-, 7111j, rs-i L'Cl Ql'. I to be _nc1kidL:kI Ill i.'W Ill 2. Pualani Makai The Nalanal Makal d,evekirrnerll Is located livlkji 11„' 116;11e 11. across cif Pijapmianiill StrQe. overmomiles nurlh of the Lilp-,11i1 \1111;,1 prok:ct. Tfils J�:VCojpil-,:nr L;J' 111jlItj-filjjjj1: :fild '1711C PULIpuaanui Sinc7 111x4;',Ci114111 Monlo ": 1­Vq�- [di S &ch4-alcd Lctit furl. throuOl- ',11-AiI i, lum lane fot- all at)T!l_(%�:CI!Ci. API�l_(,K'1L:IW, 011 RUILTC I I W CIT "d to rvo;ccl,(I ro-711111,Ld le"t-tuni phasin­. TI-.L-rL, va7 lit) f111LitiF,1sF 1-C:ol1uaclidalloil [O'r the Po,'plular-A Street ;:11v roaches. Th1 AdLnon of the maLi [,-u of 11-11.: ltm:,.jiuj Street will di-vcrt some traffic 3V,r,[� L 1711 bli�akiirii I ThL� PL,�a�,wi .11aAai 71-cq?1­ RE�! or, (Thc Til-Laffic 01 LL -1I I I 19I) ll'.d LkLd111'0j'!Ct '_CLCI'aled tl_aA'J_'V,6L�`l:Ll`Ofjt 1.111 L11', IrUl'i-je. Tcaj'fiI iI`c}rn rrc,ILci a.1 I 111-plcl rIlL! ii:idy Int of 11.1'. p-vl,:C1 :11". ):Crc addL:d Lf7 lh�: N,`ck:,Zrivtind VOJLlvc_ The 0: \ I:Akii [11 L'J 11 i0l. I 11-k,01.11 I' I 1 -1 .1 1"k ;�I[Mc 11V 1JI1111111,L h 111c wl&llu it' ROULC L. I ('I I A k I I i I L k a v. 11 1 L: k i lil :'C C t 1: 11111 i' E) L 1 10 1111:1 f0l I C 1.1 11 1 1 L I " :t 3. Youth Gymnastics and Sports Fitness Facility I ­-iu 'w','11111 (1" 1 111: l.m: L ld '.1 [1. - I I - I,: F;'.C, I 11.% 1, 1, 1 Ck I i I I' Rc 11 ith accc,!, I I I 1,11,11 -Lu ](:);ILI 'I IIL' Ill 1': 14 k'.,': Ilk 1W Tul-JI lkl:l, ir I'vi', e ti,: -ei 11 kr are al, p:v,,, i i i i. i i : I y 15, 1'.l 10 -T,--1-:2 (I 1. 11 II'I I :le ;j 1: errini - i i 1",1•'I' ?;OSI 1'\1 0, I'N-1.Appro'% Im,. LAy 15 to fi 4'111 dri"i iiivi-,.I iv i::C I TO :1111 ,'1 11' I L -) I Ns faeilll\ ":111CIL" 1111h1: k' J,:"Wl. .-I I'M `.:il. 1-iitir- T[i.,--, -Acic ;i,rilh_iicJ h-Li-,cL, o:i "If). B. Roadway Construction ProjL-cts Ru; i dw�i-� ,,onm? il-c i io r [,I-' '' I J Cr - 1 'l( -LI Wow were 1'eSOAl,'),2d ;: rld 311: .9 I17cd ro Li ssyss rhe: xitential flit [Ir 1� 'I I 'LlCt Ol 4.11-% 1 Lk I Unk 1 1, IL, I" _,Ctions. I �J, C r , I -�.- 11 i ,)Cx1t fill Lirc _'L W1 [­U�_ I i C11 I� i i -1-t:is are expec-1 L"I Ill [I': C;- %4'111' L q :-rill. I I cct 111C or \-,1ILL111eS at TA. I,> on 1-k:% i,'kv Vranspon;iliun Pro--mam (S 111'1, TL_, _:-L flic 'ji P:xlanci Hi -e Phil I are not found e tra 11s, p I tan C j infllu S'l -P. 1,1L. IrAr­ 4 jvoi.:cts wcrc assumod to be captuicc:' Lit 111C 13.1CkLTLTU-i1 18 Royal Vistas TEAR 55FA7 internaiii3nal 1. Widening cf Route 11 from Henry Street to Kamphamha III Read I I - I - I 1 :JIll.t1IZ,ITi CI SitCCI tl1 I I h 1111-:-. Rou I;: I 1 11' Ss I,; C' -I -d h. ["'o hir, d Lii .L- _Itid u :,I t.(If bl:--, L41 Il w I11'k:,.l I'% �, 117 1' 1 1 nt.-fl i IQ --�I k11-:1 CI-LiTL' foi this pr(icct and ih%Crefoik2 it wi,, i(J in the analyst of f1ITUL z 2- Lako Street Extensiorl Al;l 111'1',"v. ThQ �;onnc�:! on iti AbOLL' I. - 11-1k.:-; 110111 0LI'C I lit I Il'o �trtc!7 117:15.'LL- mn-hei- <'05'1Ie,:-0l- road -..AJ 01 \{11Di 111, wuuld pl-LIVICIL: i14CL'bS ILI Alli DFive arld 11 k-- -Wi=-:c -'JI I ThL;-rc is currcnily no ar.-lcI:-iaicJ AallUcomptclion ijaLc 1:61- [Ills proll . cct. 3, Alii HIghway from Hualalai Road to Keauhou Shopping Center ih��c: �i! I Y'J,I '111'::`1 1 !01 LT 011 'Thwo 6K:iIii.hii-Kem.w� P;ii Ili - 4%111,.`4`1' K - i Kh, hA-::-d 11.1 il 114, 11 '1, 4Vk, l'I( 41:1, •• for 11',' \ani K..1 II; I 1-,m (see I- I :iu I L! 6) .Ao,,v, Ili,, fli rJrk2 A 111 11 ! Ji %X:i y Ir: Motile 11. ccnnccIi:),L--. 1L) Rowe I I I;Lcad an,. PWIII-,WLltji tl-C;-'t 011d CX"-11kM1�' 11IJVUL!h thi: nro`,-ut Lircl- lo K.:m11101-1 Shollpin,-- ('L-ntcr- The, compiaium uf'ilds 1-17; +J . rrold,an :d-2rmin1 - Io Mil DI'v" Ilid Ro7llc I I Ili 111 L' diT-,`Cfi the rnrNx),ind I,Axi S,'reul hL mi,' h ke 1pkiths -,ire [+miwd ;floncp tl (BILI - Z, I hg,?vvay extension. I here k Clirruntly no lrlticil--; - .,,: �7.1,-T date for this project aiid therefore it LN as not hicluded hi the analvsk 01 ftltWc, con-d[I.110LIS. C. Multimodal Plans 1. Bike Nan Hawaii RIkv T'I:i:l HLiwal: rei'%frtnces st!vtra-1 near-term projects. Two of 1h -- 1-0J41 on KILIAMI i :-I-m LalkaStreei toffiialakal Road. an -i ;i �I,-ned d- ir,-c ro."I': OIIROI�1:, I -his project is not eXp-MCd I0 ll,IFC an iii L1 10 (hC JJLIJ'.1 11(�IZLV St['12C: 10 1 ill the �tzld 2. Statewide Pedestrian Master Plan T'n o 4' 0 1 1 S l:a-ie ti% ilde Pe,[,��n 1 ili i M Lh1t7 Plall &L-, not include any rcdei i Ell i 411Ci I I!Y L.rgrkades or (IT' } t -L I k: I 10 F in ' i, D. Community Plan 1. Kona Community Development Plan The Offil."';Ii Vc� i- - Van( Kailua .4reri fi-on, rhe Kona C-'ommwdf,y Development P,U)i JWiison Okuinow. 200,, 1 Iiiii-re C01111,201ullti 01-11111:1.11 1 lll-LII!111ti1 LO ROUtC I I in the location nl'Royal I . SI.Fee[10 I.CLIL11'.1 Si10C% .31IL' :2) PdUlelhia Sired Irl kekt;m:wA -110MI ill Fllc-,IU: (). 113w C:oinploi.lon (if Al -11- mi(� the 1..1ko Sired E.N:LT.ti:L-in are oko sho-%vii In 6. The tiiwng 0'lic.m- mipol%�-nents i% and 1€ ;ti Iwt CXJ.'ti!IJAI i - ley vill be complci`,-1 IIJOT 1- 111,4. 11-14 11--o likcl� co:ndtion is 111',11 7114 dL%ClQ[N:I-S Of RLI til Vl,,i.,A,, k; I'll. 7hw iI-k,(.;imo�i P..LCC I-crol-C Pfw:�L: 2 1� Royal Vistas TXAR" 5SFAI interna6innl r Is r �I _ :#kms. _ "fY wOk -Me+ > s � -�Nth ••_- _,• r '4 r 6: - f }' �* PraQosed Roads, Pmpor cry Trarml L1r1e' ^, r CDP odlecbr, minor CiPrrkmrud TkHub" — QP, COueclor rh4at M rrm mr CPQ corlacWr mwer `q P!d#skrkanAUke Paihq {Cl1Pr TOD 1 i Id`` •' I TYPEwe a+rhaou ,� Rvgwwad Canker karke ' Nei Mftna F"elh r I�Ru. Tc , f CEOs' •� Shared •' { �; e ti GbDLdckw m �y POfcy Layer r. MIWI 1,1103 2.C�Q Feel 1 kr)fh ecuals 2,Ofl4 iEek Source: Co er: ty of Mawwatr The County of hawari Planning De pd.,!Tnew FS the repository of the otic iai rnop _ Kona Corrimanity Development Flan Figure b: Kona Community Development Plan 20 Royal Vistas TEAR 55FA7 internaiii3nal E. Volumes 1. Future 2024 Without Project Volumes '1:1C P-11.1LO *"(LIJY ore"t v"11117H, '1CM;I 1:1.1 L?L'01 �.,,;vvl Ill. 11100 1 Al) I onlill" oil Rourc .:Ill "'AI'llil 1 Mt: 1 13,11,1 il I Will I L I Ill 1 :,110%; J111 MCI .11 loi 1,1.k)lll to The x, TIvIc_,pol -la-._"n :1,11 - in Kor'.Li on I LoLk -Iil i Bu7l 1'(}::4,1 145 LIc I L; Jl I J: _C-IC:S III 2f;'(P and % --jl 2035. Thlti 1_:111,i1:C:i 11.1 J ;)1inual Ir 11,.L Therel'Or--. rakt ol I 'Y: JlCl_ 1-,�d 14) ;)k dir')L, 11 :l1ovC1111:11I, � .."I'l k0ar': al Ow 7Il,A% from Plualaril Malcai and 1:it Youth Gxrnm.-is6cs and Sporis -V 'J -C dJL.LLI :1'�M -110 1 . " ", " i. I " 4- ;1 thL back-_�Lotind C-,',iLIJLLtCk: I d1L11'C VOIL.:1)CS A-11.1101.1.1. 111.L� 171'0"C�A 1' 11 'I)L: I U'Ll' L 811own In I 2. Project, Related Volumes The 1l7111454e11 Ro_�-ill % 1tito,, include 25G 111111v-111111_1[4 rci5dent1_L-11 dwelling fov ['fi:­,c 1. -\-.I OFrilktMt Lirkf C%POC't:'Ll ?0 110 10�1 VIL�e lMit, -xirll t-kvo ;i[ viiv�, �tor- sIIli,gor�it,,foThe popoSCd fi,&TV tWIV P'Llti(li1-1114' lallj [1�C 1:071.1 1!112 T.'h? 10' Ed.,lonOTE, 2016). ITE_' &I_Mt­ifliw %fidil-kinill.v 1' ouNMgO.w.4 Ri,Li I :..id -�N`tll 11 1', �. �,;Iiw, I'll:Ili -11�, f-1 '11 IQ�1�1 fl -I "'L, kk� Al m, I -I I hL: �Iltii.j, lo,�;wd I ! .1 1 1 IS l_iM M 1114, [IL:%'. IPa'.�I':`4'tc'tl i1(':I) Ihe propk',,Cd PIvJCCL k1C CAIII;,UCS 101' IMlio,,11 1_:'.Ac I T;il)lv Ill: Vsti walcd I ri[v� ( vrivraivil - I'llast- I ,A 1-1 1 1111-1 I and Ilse Ill F.Codul VQ Ll !It i(Il 11 1 F (I [I a ( io n Ristl 12201 I)N% 01 iri u L Flit,,, I F ------------------------ '7. Ln (T) ---------------------------------- ---------------------------- S 1n,z Out In out 23% 77% 63% 37% 27 90 86 51 T = Total number of (rips gcmrated. X Dwelling Units Trips generated by Ilie Rcval Vistas Phase I will cuter and exit at the Royal Vistas Roa4way and were d is ( i i b Ll tC Ll a, 2 il u RU UT e 11. a"ord ing to existing travel patterns. The ex s 4r I l I 1 }f 1 1 1) s,-. I: i,- n t vo I Urn es betWteen Ptla P1 M iA IM I Street and Kuakini Street were u."d to deten-nine OiL, Inbo-Lind prL' zni &�,vlbutiofl. - Ir, .1i 4Lj Du L 5pl i'_ ur LI),vido,'Ji Iny Te. -p Geriom fior?, 107x' Edition (ITE 2016) for Land Use 220 21 Royal Vistas TmR 5SFAI fnfernaiAmIll —ep--d It Analv2ed Ptak HUur VOI4 MPS � YInahzed � unsignalized IN rntersem on � � AIV! (PMI (veh. rj `��/ Intersedion �,_./ Intarsertion P �� Figure 7: Future 2024 Without Project Peuk Hour Volumes 22 Royal Vistas TIAR SSFAI infernaiii3nal 1i:1 cw.1 oii 1hc cxi'siirigy 2.01 � iralfit: v(11111110. oil RoIIIL: III hCIWL:Ctl I'L9.1P.1.13MIL11 "i[rcci alid Lakk] Streci, ih,; AN -1 peak hour directicii is nortlibowid, and the PM peak hour dirv-ctiuD is soutfibound. Table I 1 shows the directional PCTCenta'7eS at Ro= I I and Naptia.mid Strect that were used to deteriiiine the inbound nip It, di A ibUtiOn- FabW 11: EX is I i I] AY 2 0 19 Vi I I I I Inc S on R00C I I h 0 WVC 11 1' 1131111 ;1 J I I I I i SI :11111 1% Ila ki Ili I I ky [Ilk .!.V The 20 11) -, i:T�-,,,u 'd %c Zit 1'L:,1I1kK)J11'.1i StY,-et were used w detennMe 71,;: r)- percent distriL-at1cm. Poval VkI.L.-: WI 11 ILX, � -'S'111JI" I I'Lil,: --isc ak Pualani Estates, wh3 -.'h 1'iA J) Of R,A-1:t" Vi�C15 ""Id el: -'I I -,'IL[ly ~AL1 -A a-, :1-c ir:iri acc�;ss to Rcute 11, 0 1 -StatC I . u`�Utllld 1"�l I "�L: 101- '01- Af Puapiu)tin.ji '�Ireet is antic'.'-, to have a si:i-wilir cufhc,Lin,- at Itoadway. !able EG s1L1 14 :I:ti CXIN`iflL� LIIJ�)0..I1IL1 foL. 1,11;;L111 X. PtiLIPU=11h SILCC-. ihe AM ajid PM ptik how-,. T�A,2 ,h-,, ii fi) Table I I T�L:rc u�-:d CO- 111L: 0U:h0L1I1:; 11 11: thAl 111.111011 -,11 1111 ROV'al P, 11iC I 'I a1& 12: Existing _'1119 Outbound Volumes at Puapilntaii id Street AM N 7, S13 F'IJ'I N R ';,R V 3 1 U rl' 877 gas 8-7-:1 -3.1c) r lerceilt L32:`4I 48,o 4 8,2 u The 20 11) -, i:T�-,,,u 'd %c Zit 1'L:,1I1kK)J11'.1i StY,-et were used w detennMe 71,;: r)- percent distriL-at1cm. Poval VkI.L.-: WI 11 ILX, � -'S'111JI" I I'Lil,: --isc ak Pualani Estates, wh3 -.'h 1'iA J) Of R,A-1:t" Vi�C15 ""Id el: -'I I -,'IL[ly ~AL1 -A a-, :1-c ir:iri acc�;ss to Rcute 11, 0 1 -StatC I . u`�Utllld 1"�l I "�L: 101- '01- Af Puapiu)tin.ji '�Ireet is antic'.'-, to have a si:i-wilir cufhc,Lin,- at Itoadway. !able EG s1L1 14 :I:ti CXIN`iflL� LIIJ�)0..I1IL1 foL. 1,11;;L111 X. PtiLIPU=11h SILCC-. ihe AM ajid PM ptik how-,. T�A,2 ,h-,, ii fi) Table I I T�L:rc u�-:d CO- 111L: 0U:h0L1I1:; 11 11: thAl 111.111011 -,11 1111 ROV'al P, 11iC I 'I a1& 12: Existing _'1119 Outbound Volumes at Puapilntaii id Street The fulkirc the R,5,,I;1' Rc2d%av aprn.Ji to have a left turn and a iurn I- im 7rin- LwI 2.i :11-� I'I' VILIC'd '07 Ille SOIJ-+�111H'Id 'L1118 M 1'1111-1011[1(1 FI'L-fhl 1L.1-1- 11 to Royal V Isms, R 1. L':Il lurr'� ;II -0 cfl.i Ir) -1 i,�c A Pk.- k how- i -.'i 1 1 trial Nv;i rri'l i 111111 ;I AV'21 kL, -l%: [,!tl ftu 1112 7-M,� 1; -:N-,l I V i-� I:J* Ro.i,:Tvay, The ii, -w raadwk ,T 1)1L1 i i(In did nol -1vL1I ai - r tl , I ii durl I le A,N-1 01 -PN -1 hIed k I "All. '7:) 1� ri' L: I,%):] L] I ILI I AILJ J< Ll I I ;107-00111 `0 1 C11 II A :i I: -111 kI hC YLA'k I L kl 1111 -11L' '; I ,I,: 0 C I IlQ I <i: L-l'�,'Cl I Lill for PQLJC 1; 1 F wt niwctivity. A reCL 1,111e JOLF .,M r L. qr� .6'.lie 11 is :'d as m is is an ! L:I,: I Avers,,,cT ion anti -r% I I 11 <d"- 1:11 1':1 10 11,. J I I -I-- The expcc i cd rilt I,, i: Lane coo 11 L, I I I a- - or i I o%vil III I - IL. I r C 8. Pro' '!C1 .1 .'(I i I I I, I', ii- -1024 ( PI i,, -,,- I J :.rc �i(nvn Till I - I,-,. I I -C 9- 3. Future 2024 With Project Volumes I :d:L'd i.is the Futti)Fe 20.24 W-LOWUL PY(�'td VOILIIIIck L'Stl llaLc FkJLLL-- p,:ak hour valuni,. J :L:kJJ-C 10), 23 A M P .Rl; 197 .107 4 The fulkirc the R,5,,I;1' Rc2d%av aprn.Ji to have a left turn and a iurn I- im 7rin- LwI 2.i :11-� I'I' VILIC'd '07 Ille SOIJ-+�111H'Id 'L1118 M 1'1111-1011[1(1 FI'L-fhl 1L.1-1- 11 to Royal V Isms, R 1. L':Il lurr'� ;II -0 cfl.i Ir) -1 i,�c A Pk.- k how- i -.'i 1 1 trial Nv;i rri'l i 111111 ;I AV'21 kL, -l%: [,!tl ftu 1112 7-M,� 1; -:N-,l I V i-� I:J* Ro.i,:Tvay, The ii, -w raadwk ,T 1)1L1 i i(In did nol -1vL1I ai - r tl , I ii durl I le A,N-1 01 -PN -1 hIed k I "All. '7:) 1� ri' L: I,%):] L] I ILI I AILJ J< Ll I I ;107-00111 `0 1 C11 II A :i I: -111 kI hC YLA'k I L kl 1111 -11L' '; I ,I,: 0 C I IlQ I <i: L-l'�,'Cl I Lill for PQLJC 1; 1 F wt niwctivity. A reCL 1,111e JOLF .,M r L. qr� .6'.lie 11 is :'d as m is is an ! L:I,: I Avers,,,cT ion anti -r% I I 11 <d"- 1:11 1':1 10 11,. J I I -I-- The expcc i cd rilt I,, i: Lane coo 11 L, I I I a- - or i I o%vil III I - IL. I r C 8. Pro' '!C1 .1 .'(I i I I I, I', ii- -1024 ( PI i,, -,,- I J :.rc �i(nvn Till I - I,-,. I I -C 9- 3. Future 2024 With Project Volumes I :d:L'd i.is the Futti)Fe 20.24 W-LOWUL PY(�'td VOILIIIIck L'Stl llaLc FkJLLL-- p,:ak hour valuni,. J :L:kJJ-C 10), 23 Royal Vistas TZAR 5SF147 interna6innf Legend J* Analyzed ___--Pfulect SignaEized urksierltd erwCerseCe an D*Ovewway Intersection Intersection i S Si n Figure 8:: Expected Future Lane Configuration 24 Royal Vistas TMR SSFN7 in[erna6innf legend } rro1k Hour volumes Analyzed Project Signalized Unsigna'"szed Siap Sxen # A [rv, [veh/hr} Intersection Driveway � `n"rsezt!"D' & Intersection Figure. 9: Phase 1 Project Related Trips 25 Royal Vistas TMR SSFN7 in[ernatii3nnf legend } rro1k Hour volumes Analyzed ..... Project Signalized Unsigna'"szed Siap Sxen # AN [rv, [vehAr} Intersection Driveway � `n"rsezt!"D' & Intersection Figure 10. Future 2024 With Project Peak Hour Volumes 26 Royol L`istas TIAR 55FA7 internatii3nal F. Future 2024 Intersection Traffic Operation Analysis IFtI:'1311:i:11",II rl t', `t :'1 :Citi ',Z4'4i ,1 :l 'I 1."'.` wl7`11: I1,"L'{: 1 111'I"4i't"I Ir:1l Vu'1t17 Protected Ilcrlrlltted ILII -turd pli;+�,lrli7 )n Ri'Li1, 1 1 .':_li: I1Li1':111•.SLv£ 11:01.-:ll::l 11'_:I*ll'.'r' '11 Th�: [Urn at livalalai R.r.LLI (SOIJ'1,1 ill'Iu aL:.11 ;, :111,11 . t t1 '.ti 1'll ,I :.I Cu:lcl:.ut':1 I,. IL nlcl Rclw.r; I .. I. Future 2024 UV7thout Project Intersection LOS I'lw�02-1 Wi:hou I'f(ti i 4111lC['Sk L1oTf ;i`l+_; 1'1 VC1llL:l:t LOS :t1141,1kt1'.LL"L' .L. 11 ill: 13L''-vellcle) were .leiclIIII let 101 11 ,31:1] PM pt.: k. hkq� �rs. sllm%n in 1.0-1Ie ii. IT ;k;h'e11 1,1%r. irlclii IwN the overall 311' C' :}C1 L:� I;I� . ,rl•,� ..`I.1 111•, ,hat C1perated at LCIS E or woi ss: art' 1l1,Yillightwcd ill yellow. Synchro output is in flpllt:r1dl7 , D_ a) Route 11 and Polani load_ Overall intersection LOS = CIC (AMIPM) I1'+ilk 1 :If -r' a Ci llftitl I.t.r-ti :ion (rt Ru,itc i I twi;li 1~,*Garai (tic+;ill rc.:_llttij in ippropriatc LOS D .� Ilel Itl -VJ .ii14 PV I, e,:1% I-, iLr, h) Route 11 and Henry Street. Overall Intersection LOS = CIC (AMI,FM) 11' I,, c. + U117ti 111, ;Ir 1'lk• .•,i -r,. 1I1;f, I I nlwrA I;, 11%' 1 I with I leery Strut resulted in appropriate LOS D ho IC 1,°L.r.11 ? A.\t ,in; PM I +r<:L 1_ tJ Route 11 and flualalai Rood (North) .At the un5i,_niallz; wO latersection o 1?: utr : 1 .h iih 1 iLI,11,11,11 Strei,� [101 (1)i,',1AbOU11O� left ttlrrii[lg movement has LOS F i k t: o4 1.97 aL;d 0.3 I I ,LC; .w1_ r ;.t1.Ll Io1110th :1"11 Lm%.i PPI ;3wtLk ]LOW', S1LW to Ii]�?11 %1)11.11W-, oll Ili alL . I I. I 11L �11;1:o :i:A olI ti ;1111'0r 0J)QFLL1L'C ;11 .i C• :['•' iblc k:w�As Of servi� r durir,: tale -W trod I'1'1 llt.Lk IWL.rw_ d) Route 11 and Hualalal Road (South) 1C 014 1111�1ilwlIzed I'll lor, of 1�011te I I '+ ill 1 1.1.11.1 .II tot' l,'. ;tit llLll I. 11'L•C1'.7111"il I}"C 1.11'11 :tcr n1Dvelnent Ilan I .()ti I (v1c nt`11.�_aJ LiI-41 G. S P cl!vek; 11'11 I0,rI�� sieIal , dLii i,i ' I):)11) M aI'Ll PN I I:tifLL are flue to lli',Ii ill rt§tt;,,IL �,-olani i.:s oll RoLl[1= 1 1 . 'I cic Irl .iuI array otlic; I.1Lla1! IWL.•_L3+rrits orclritcd .t1 twLglt.i1110 levels a}I r,ic.t JUVIns' 111t ,1'11 ;_n,l TW I cak hour;_ e) Roure 11 and Puuptiaonui Street. Over'a!1 Intersection LOS = BC/0 C (AMIPA4) A11 176d irtVr-:,,ciions of Route I 1 with Puapuaanui Street resulted in appropriate LOS D OF and PM pe.ik hours. D Route 11 and Ka ukini HIghliway At 11lif unsiG_iltl.7/cd Liior-,cctloil of Route 11 -wlih Irtt.L.1'tiini Highway, northhound lel'i turning movemen' has LOS I' , % -� t7:0.911 and long delays during the AM peak hour due to high. through `'ohin w-: on Route 11. 'I'll-, I'uAalni Makal develt)pnlciu will lead to Puapuaatlui Street keotning a 4 lt�.- Hit.' tiwwtit ri, TILL, Pu<Il.tn7 Makaj TIAR ri�roiiwti l the eastbound lett turns from Kuakini l i. l'tital� to 11II,Immanui Sli L ,•t and other inlcl•nal rca&l . 27 Royal Vistas TZAR SSFAI inferna6imill Tahle 13. Future 2024 %k ilhoul Projed 1111ersection I .e"el or Ser-, ice 28 AM PM Diflaysec ill Vic I Oul -y N- clyeb) Vic Los Rn L -. p 11 %L Ppl'wl RIA PveT'111 C 77:P 74 61 D a L L L:: '1"�.Jph 0145 1) 14,4 0.34 B ?3 D F-I.D Pai -ni I 'k 1 0.66 D RiputF Ll 1N,nry St (ov,i.=ijI) K -1-1 '![C�J::I' 3+1.1 1 0.65 1; D 3.1.5 p I 4 -h I j i 1 42 1 Lu 1 7 1%,z T Rou-,, 11 Lq lduejlidm (.Ijj (Duel nl 11 1 13 P EE L-2`: 37 ti.Y 11.36: F RL'L'-"'L- 11 & 71U.I1d1di i51 10VUrAl'i L L- I 1 D. 24 a :L7 11.7 0.11 B RO L CkS I I K Pi.-.-tp-.m.anLA St (ovornIIJ 717.1 - ------- I C ?M.b 7Z.3 A "" - I C 1 -1 '4b -c rt 11.!, :7. -INR 111 �A:�' 1 K.:t ::: -IS8 L.,,-. 21. ;x.33, 0.83 ig.c 15.9 4- L. 11 i-mr F� D 17.-L",I L 11' 21 3 'D.O 13.3 L C 6 C Ro i -u'. I 1 9 R L..' jv u p rn I bi F I 11. K. I.; k F 1' 10.0 7.7 C A 40.2 0.91,t; 0C 0.00 RO L,F- 11 & 1Hkij S! jDvp.ra11j 42'L1 - 0 27.[ C P C. j '1? 71,- ---------- 2-3 0181 C 42.4 0.95 D 52,1 3.86 D 11 2 r 56 C 23.3 0. iG 0.94 F H A5 4,32 E I F, '.1sil-Right L: 11, 41.2 015 D ; 2 0.16 D 62.1 169 E 59.0 0.159 E 54.9 0.34 D 5r3l 0.42 D ROL'- 11 & Eam 11 Rd ave.rAlj 18.3 24.4 - C l! -L _1 _J L: V. D0,74 D 049 D D f-,, L_ 3.11 0 LL..,. 042 B a.74 317 11) L 437 062 D 28 Royal Vistas TXAR SSFIvr lnternatannal gf Rau to 11 and I.oko Street. OvernIt Intersection LOS - OIC (AM PM) 1t -11c sicltaliz:ci isltrrsecu,ri ,r V-outc° 1 I -'< itl. L Il 1.r tr4wt. -Iik.- c astbound IM tum operates at LOS 1. (v c 11'' 1.941 dural'- the X149 pc ­ I, _1.,ur Jlkci LCA) I: i `. 'c. F,i' i! -ti i EIL.r"_1,1 LIT F Oji n_-ak 1.,DLrr. The WCS1I10UI1C[ 'C ft It1711 ::I ca oper.atcw .a Lt);) l ':,, c (8.'0.60 Liu J '.11,X' Jurlm2 I:lc AM :Lncl P I peak Itc7°.Lr,- i ills I, :rndhzitcd lc; Ih, 1';ar11( Il11rIc :Jrlc. ll'y11i1 I',Il:lwi:-w -,-r tl1L L,!1, u .St1-eet approracilcs. A1.1 caller rdl+ t wi]i�'le. at Lako 4Lik'e 7 i of :_—ates at LOS Dui l:t''1�2I tJL.IL 1,4-t'1 peak hOLlrs. h) Route 11 and Komehameha III Rood. Overall intersection LOS= S/C (AMI P1M) All mock°a1.:mts at th'- -:iumalized intersections of 1C l.Ir4 "- 'ti'lt,l [ti,..lt 1t,In-ivIi;l 111 in az>Ir.-,rplitit;: LCIS D 41 1;4t; l dui i17g,1;4M and PIAT p7 1'� Z. Future 2024 With Project Intersection LOS l iii- Wirli I'rr k-cl .i:`d tlra{1v -.n7:nt Lt..N and ai -wrap do l air 1,.-r whick) were d', IC I'1111'liri 101- .IIS [I -LI I'M 11C 11, 11OUI S, 4 '10 % n Ln t ;11-11: A. NOTL- All `%'o.\.LlL'outed throtJt:t_ 1 " :°I5-'. 11'Lo4;i :".:•..' c . c Road%% �i i to RotltL= 1 I :01' 17,11"11,' _ 0 111 "IjaSe 1 I Ae shaded rw., 17d4 k'La14`, IJiL: o,',`I:IoI ?:ii cr t:ctlUli LIC Iaa'� . \1' I:Ii:1.� tl:alI o.. or worse ai:L` IlI L_I"I:': i 111 vL'II.'''',% I'1I:11' [I l: -mi iw I,I Appel Id i.\ I- 0) Route 11 and Poluni Road. Overall Interseetitvtt LOS = CIC (AMIPM) A1, :I1,'ti 1111.11'• all :1 1.:I zed i,t,'c Ioii;i ofRottte I l Witll P.LI.1111 KAIaIL1 awsLa tL4l 1: i ' �I11i'IM1l4L c. LCIS D ff bCIICI- :I.r'I1 1' .1114. I'M I-WAk Ilk) IL1"1. h) route 11 and Henry Street. Overall intersection LCIS = CIC (AM/PM)l T"1k° 1t C`';1'i llllcl lilt IL1r:1 11l',yl"]tt'S at -I) y . 1 1.711'Ig t1le €'N1 ji:Li 1 1'('.111. Of tilti l'';I Iimim1 mid r11c as?I"..I :.1"1A1CF L:01III11 b - aIdiLisr[-ed to I k:,it:c; :1I?IY'Q'l; 11 111,:1'~•'. .'.I I i.i<I'141 l:l"'.4.114 1`w .'Li the si-na3hzed 1t1ttrsecticris Of RaUte 11 with Ilkmry Stied rC's1V:%-J L:.i ta1''p.-ot'Jrl:l.ti: Lai`, D ,7:' _�JTC-r i:'Jr1111; AM and 133 peak hours. rJ Route 11 and Hualala Road (North) At t:l. L11".1.11Mlized in -Xi till. ton ofRoutc I I %vith I1Ltalslai Street I'MU-th), e: Ir ,t?ciulL, Ic1t ti1LltLal a: 'A:. I.111 h_s LOS I- f1.c :::ic. 1. 13 re"r.LcLi1�'!v} Jurira both AM arkt '%I I)C LJL h0Lc.;4 Ul'2 dUL: 1.0 I:I I.1 1:11','LLLIl vu[ullwsoil RoUit I .. I :10111:LJoram'!ofll.l--'iw-iorlalltilkQp;;rLik, 1111L:kL 'L"' L: 41L:"i:lm' The AM and PM peat., I:1Iur.w. d) Route 11 and Hualedai Road (South] At the Lan-,Igm lIzcd 1114 r„, Ior- 11 ki Hirt- I I �,vitl-L I luat:llrli Flo ad (smith 1, wcCstbourkd lift turnim, a11[ovt`1 elft has LOSI 1�rc -if [I ,ci <':,t`. 1I.` r, ,14'4tlti'.', .`LIl l!1^ 1w,,1 :111 and PM hr,1.:: ; :u°.',1L.i' 1r1 t'.I;'_1 I:lr'.ru 11 1ROUt: I .. I Al L1::LIi11” :.:Ji:. L+:.ILL_1 :11 l':,' 111:; :' .M .ni(l I';v1 pcLJtk hoot -,. e) Route 11 and Puapuaanui Street. Overall Intersection LDS = CIC (AM%PINI) ,All L11C}l n1k':u:; III, rcllin`lt 1PIL'r�cC1'RI;,:171' Nom. I %N:11'I :'u.Ll' I'r.:IrII ` Ir:�1 r:.Ilth,l irl ,1111 x1;17~i,I1,w LOS Dar K, r,ar L.1111112 '1'-I :1r1_, I"%l :)c.lk h'.1: } 7 Royal Vistas TFAR I ii hic 1 -1: Fu I u re 2024 With 11 rojecl I w ersvel ion Level of Seri ice SSFAI inlernoMann l In rr! il Del av 4.w. Elve h� AM VLC LOS DeLlav (vee lvp.h I -PM v)c Los RULIlle 11 & I"al.: -i: Rd I LjVLrmfll.t I I o., I F 2.1..3 1 1145 D-34 c a v 27.3 40.7 1815 0, 1 0.67 cl R G. U07 0 41.7 0.74 U 0L47 B 17.0 0.44 9 D 41.8 0,74 D CL25 c 31.4 OLQ c 0.51 u 53.7 0.14 D DAB c 36.5 064 D IlRoijte 119. Henry St (awraill -we I r'. 1 • 34.4 0.66 c 30.9 0: 6q c 0.49 47.9 0.63 Cr Mwwz, 1 1- 1': D-3� c W -G G.M c I I 1'.11 LWH c 23. i b 0..19 c 0.4-4 1 56.9 0,63 E I -',`;T- n 1 CL63 c 14,3 0-66 c Rouki! :. 1:".6- 1 nnn'%R ,-fr TI -,'-7. 'h [ 28.] WA c 0.48 D 39.0 0.42 11 3C...9 wio O 39.5 015E D 34..2 001 c 34.5 0-01 C- 411 0-14 3 41.9 4.7E u ----------hrouGh R *ht IRuu N 11 Ku A i;l a i I N) (,j 4L r u I 37,9 1).72 - 36.6 0,71 rl 0.2S 8 117 OJ6 H .1027.1 2.37 IF 239,9 0,43 F ROLIEH. it & Huaklai Sj (owaralhj 9-1 - -LlK -I S:j L.-, ' 1 13.1 0.14 6 11-9 0.11 9 167.0 0:29 F 269.4 R58 F ROUtFl L2& I'Lar.UaARIJI St :,i,:!kjph 22.9 13.0 - CL34 I 0 24.6 213.9 - 0.49 c c 22.D 0.85 C. 17.0 ()76 Ft. 11. .3 FLIS 19 12.2 GAO 8 I 1:' 1-, 11 1 7F. rI- 19.;; 0.77 6 29.1 0L92 c 0L67 D 15 'R 0,66 D --L II - l.. Ar i 28.8 CL01 c 2j.6 0.0 c '.',L --T. 32.1 111.33 L 31.4 1116 c 29 R 017 c r. 1, it 07 QoijLc -'I ki. R[7 al V i & La& (ovL ral 11 2-3 - 2-6 - ID4.2 O I5 F 03E c v WB Ri - h-, 20.5 P. 0 G.M A Poutt 11 KoSkim N r�111 ml 2.S - i-nt,Lc A 1, tl c lls.0 0L94 I U 037 c 'U" q: 7, D.'OD A 7.0 T.O A iftullL 114& La ku St I U YOJ 412.3 0 27.9 c 0-2 6 18.6 07.17 B 1 5 -3 77.6 G 31 0.8'0 l 211.3 0.68 c !TS 't, 24.0 -7 0.. 5 c 23.6 () .86 c 39.4 OL94 IF 69.0 0,84 E I% r, I i -I SL).0 0.L6 0 3 0.72 E 65.5 0.64 E 1135 E 5&19 0,43 F Routu Ll R Hvirn III Rd 3-9,0 19 25.13 - c 1 P 42 6 16.7 C. 80 11.70 D 13 9 .3 25.1 0.710 c -1 L.,'! 39.7 IL47 D ?0.5 0.41 D ii -I i t-Thr,lif� 11.6 6 C.34 p74 '6.4 14 R 0.43 0 R9 8 C. i)-1 1.rl I -TI 7: "1 r7 �,6 1 4,1.4 G.b� D W Royal Vistas TEAR 55FA7 interna6imill h Route 11 and Royal Vistas Roadway ;! t -1:c 7:i:1'o,,k d L::1,11' --w11 od 111t :r'Scction 4Ro;_itti I I 'alliil th4 [,royal �o- §Star koad-,' iv. the southbound Ic t lu-'ll :r o%.cjn, rlt f -on', Route 1 I iLvn Rc , -[ Vistas Road'ti%a�minrrual delav, an ril }rr,-,o of Ill 10 1" .',C0111d, 1111Clll'U'' [Will [}C:n,: I t7";n 1 11L: i11 hati LOS I. c 0 Q. -s`9 dlil-I 1) 71'� A 11 hicI:,, l P :d% lour &I r:, '71'~'11 -111'-Li IIS' 1 ', t LEI l'ti:* +.r1; V011IC I I . 1 11c LT IC2'ti L1tL)rl iLll1cl lug is }." !,CCL}1_:.11 L;: lik,- :1 .' ) L Vehlcl:: til tiT'c AM pc -aa 1,.om and 2.1'+ of dclt�L_, 1,�I ~�•11i."11•II.--1_.' P.M II::,s I:11n1Lr.7I; 11 J:01 oSI in�i+!;1lermingnlLx cltic7t4�11��1:'tlfu;?1 l�L�[i.iIIIL ➢tittI.; iil (ILllillJ, 11'C AM saki ?N'1 l)a_,tk 1101-i—s. 9i Route I1 and Koakini High way AI 1114 l with Kuakini Highway, the n0rlhh-,gird .LA tum operates ai LCIS E (vic tit e..9 Il :'.inti ':Ile :,e;1 < hmr, All otherinove€nents UpCr.ltcii .'_::I,:L,,t !.lhli lc Wvels of -service during the AM mit', I'd 111.- .1, 1 1 4111 .ti h) Route 11 and Luko Street. 0vera tt fnter'secfion LCIS = DJC (A WPM) At '-1::: ;i=1L:iliri:d kjl:' RtiL.Ltc I I 4kitlt Lail) :1112 1:,;-11"AII'al -1.'11 1.11:1 C�l)eMICM LOS F(v.c Lal I J111.111 111 AA] I)_• -'k hour and LOS I-'. ir•fl!_N'-' 111. 111.1' 1',I :• a4. I".0111T. Th* %%c, -hound left TLMI Ld-o "I, r,11 :rt I,' '-s I regpeci vel 1Jur ii.- 11-L 1',l xiL: I'%1 Thi I:_,icals ! s. p r:llk-, at l t.).,-� I- Iv w t1•;5 �sal,l ti, M, rC`tiii'tw'I', � durinC the A I and ll I}v -L 1,.o,Ir,, [ _ll i,[,1, is at 1: tr t It ti .iltL , lur1 '; ,,nd spit 1)has1tli-, fbrthe Lako Street a' pp -mach <. :ill ol.1--'r r1:t v,!.I. r1• .It Lako )S p ov duri.l,'. I1,,ih 7K'.11c r� Route 11 and Kamehameho 111 Rood- Overall lrlterser.trnrl LOS = BIC (AMIP10; til II`t ,ell. ll[; a' iht SL'�LI$IILCL.l 11':._ �Ctil,. Jl}: t}1 1�4,11[ti lt'I [ ,.,11Llllnr�wh;l [1[ 1:.a:.d 1tiwLLL'd ;u ;l�1�:�1['.rl:l:_' I 1. )� 1 } {,, 1't,'t1Ci llLlTlll� r'l'41 ;111�i [';4 []ti:Ln :iii:: • 3. Future 2b24 With Project Mitigation I L,1:1 1.,11-:) Street F' ,,n,I% l h.4 4, :1 I tion of Alii I Iigltway, and the l : i'A)1111lCIIL'- to "- nehanneha Ill \toad \will improve regional tt'ZiffiC iu the ALIA' 3iLti . FIlt 10Fipk:-.,m dates of ilii --c: are notknown.. In the 1ntcrim. diC1-t-tnin [111[1l�.3[1C►174 M'CL-C Ci l,- iIL 'Vd. a) Traffic Signal Warrant All iI filar tO til:' L tii tiI"' %t011dIr [oI 1:1L� rlI11or, -il ,I::I .I[l"it L.::ch let turtt,, Llpc: -._c at LCIS F during, b0ih licak 111,1u ti',It boil liu,.:;:lai Road irate., .,o lo -1•::1.1d :lie 110 I Vi,t.r; driveivay. Pkeak-Flour vo1.u1>r;le traffic signal -warrants were c'•..i:LiAed ft: : I-1,2 ?'4l .%'l r h acrd withui 11:oi,�ci Lviid I -1.}-1 :.i11Ic 15 shows the Pcak-[lour Warrantanai1 ,1:, in2{12-11�,1;1`.1L:ic bkI,.Iiksw. II,L r l 4I. I Royal Vistas TFAR 55F111,7 inlernaiii3nal I able 15.- Future 2024 lloak-llour Ntarraid' 2024 without P, -ON HOUr Warrant A ro warrant? K.'.;,k:ni l•iv,­Y V, 219i M, D-1-1 I 44 Wil Fra nt I Majo N."I ri or 1:1 N, 0 Hu,flalzi (N) Peak Hou r lova) rat AM PM 0 KLAiri'l Hw� 2.407 0 2024 WI 111 F1 roj L. c, 932 W2 11c t-- c:u 1, W11 W j YES Vajc;.r Minor %1 :r -v 1.2 I r.,;i aj C. 1,11,10. W,=iL' 2261, 44 NO 1 -'16 ':I;.'1 L'i 1.1 Hu,,Ialiii (SI 2170 9 11 [Royal t'ista, DAy u'30 24 D 0, I I jK,.Aki,)1 HW y 1 2.4118 Ct Ij None of 1heunsignahzedinterscetions sansfy dic Pcalc, 1 10 �"ik­­11�h:ii-T-.,�1.11 - 1. 11):'-;,. l'O; operate with relatively low overall delay. The minor street k M 1"LlapUalmlli Street are -rclailvely low and the observed delays are gencru.I,, nit.ck lt,k%cr flt,ii: 1.It,: J-, Ole 26011 MUTCO states: -At an Interq,`Cdon with hiLfli VO[utn'. 4)t I i, I I- I u n, h-15111 111k' :1,.:I '.`I' I I I ni I' -.% I, I il III a rtalv"l S IIIA V I)C J)C I fi ", I I I CLI I I I :i 11 LI I r i1 IM Ll I LI 'I '; I I It-- I31,':1.1 o 1' 1:1,2 11:,111 k 41 -tiI I ct I I I - I i ,,,I -I I, 1,:� -1Ile , IIII I 11O1­,IIVC1 01 L1 1 SC J: ld I hl.1 uti 51" 1% 1' 1'_` 1.- 11 1, 11 rI I :-I !II I I Ole kLIJIi1111 1,.,I- -[-]-it T'Tw AM I -L!:& 7(1-l1' I -or rK,, nurthbotind kmi) mri ,oh ii,, rujIi,c,c,fl III:: I)I. -sr tWll Volume, ajiLt the k),­tJ)osiiig southhCRIM.1 �,nlunic reprc,;ci1N the irajor Tahle 16: Future 2024 Peak -Hour Warrant' 21),'.4 VAthout Project I a k" Hou. r 'A'_- m nt .�%_- PM " :) I 'J' m I �Ivarrant? ma]. -.r Minor warrant? K.'.;,k:ni l•iv,­Y SOS f,02 YES 11:_111 340 YES Y'jj i h F1 ra e Ct Peak Hou r lova) rat AM PM M*)r Minar7—warrant? Major F—Mir—OF—i—warrant? K,takini Hwy 932 W2 I YB 1M I W j YES The 11 aiicl Kua,Ml %kl 11 satisfy the PC<lk HOL11' V`MLJll .:i 7r�'4. Fi�: i11115fitc' !I t :1 [ru I fic warl-LIT, ' :ICL'.i M I: : I I I III I - .11: 1 1011 k)f.0 IT :1 F IL' L'i )7, . 1" 1 73, 1' K i i I , I II- i%,,';1'. 1. 1 1 1 � LTI �'Cl I I' -I Iihol�.-,l le -ft -tum ]%I- I A ;3,; ;1.., : , . %\- Ir - ', ori'..:Iilmi kc,i 17). Siogle Ptak I-i,,)L;r warar17 ',V,3S eVaILjTejs tecausesufficier-, dzra %vas avada�lcz: arij io �!1;e an :ndicj7kall c" whP7heror not an inter;effrjr, shcdd be considered and rne- f. -Il' 3 -L!-&tfiC S17,1-,21, SiYigle FliA 1 -.ria %vairanl! -,V,J4 mifficier. :1 -";i :-v eirn In G:ve ill, irl ir::­i--:fi iwle-hor oI not &I Ijlterseci:IWdIOUld [W LCIP -ind om LDI L':] f',)l I 'Lri�fric signal. U Royal vistas T1AH 55F147 in[erna6imill LOP le 17. Future 2:1124 With Project- Raine 11 and Kuakioi Highway Left -Turn Sigaal phasing Alt-cruatives ? I.ann PSI Lit r? 11, Prtrtrr#Pd t,eftTrlrn :gl7al f�I7_� -1t on Kuakini Highwak Dela {se vee 175.2 APIA L05 IF IPS 97A Om tins F Dda srefuch c Los: Del sequeh v c L45 IioLte '_1$3 Kunkini IlvIV (overalll J17.5 - D 2a•3 ..._. O + 1 SR _1r OaC!' _ ''illi -1'i: %:?� I I - 11; ,F7�,;: S> : I 9&7 1.x.7 1-'12 U7 If H 121.1 17.4 1121 0.30 F C R[3lJrP 11 >l 1�11,1,l,i (5) ;nVerall 63-0 R -I J.11,C T. -.I-' 1.5 0.56 A 1.4 •3.56 A .:' I:o I I'•:'s '1,,:11.1 at.� ;1.,}"+ b 19.7 rn 0 KL:Eki -. ..I,? -,'.•.'!E_ i.:1'r o-rbach :l 11.11:;,' ;% Ll..' ;k' R 2-Unc.°°. ROLL e L.L. Pormisslvc Lift Tv^n tiigmil Ph:ts•17 g. an KuAkini ll: p,hway D x.'M 0,25 C PM 297.2 Dull*i SL•( -{1'L'11) "MJB 1-0S, De Id ymLLw:h; VIL L{}5 kotrtc _1S. Kuakir.i Ilwy (overall I 22.7 F C_ 2.7 1.48 1.75 !A 1179.3 22M 1,39 1.46 f F u.'.. 1 =B • •_ 1E.4 0.44 C •.nJz r. l's_ 11 '4 + ' 1 u 11;1 1 : I >t: i. , r A A 1.4 L.5 ?„ ^: L;-: I:i" ''il"'',V.;} � �:i n,.15-.:� .. ,711;. il. �l tl.lpt .•1 ' z Lanc Route 11, Prot -Mc n•7 Left Iutii S j:naI Phas,nl'; nn Kuakim H ahway AM PAA 111L,k3yJsvrJuLih) I fL LOS DL I aV f re rfviE hJ vfc LDS Rnt,.tr : L iG KLhikinl Hwy (ovemill 7;.5 { 3.9 - ,4 rrlpFlti ] ,: E .1` ;I � ;? :I 3 _1•, A M,L;dki:',.11111'.v::�Uaa1.:l_�O_;•..I____ . .J.L.1.__m__.. ____L�'1}________ .... A 1114 {Jwf,9(l dClav :Lt till, I I'1Ion 11'1.1 11 k 14`1:``;4; in t1i+T I1 I"14:1. 1147 5 111 l' tl k' i% TI'I,oy'141 'Jt mi ,-I, vvIII still Vp,ti IC at LOS l.: or LI.I ItLLLI ,.,'J, tiw. It is I _'. <IL:]:,'I I I c I Iic iLJs[::I:Cd it this 6) Rou w1fthodi,< Anu{_i xi-% 1:'It''1'1'1411"';II'.',': IL''f IL'.'I'I IIlk "'AT.I,'IIv II LL;I 111,1;11:11:;1 ko%itI IIII,°;y4r4'[1:531 L iI d i`,L1711:1I1I III"1113':'.', f11 4'1'111.' ;^1 l ti I' I I7' I'li"•ti II'Iti'.�l` m-, 11': 11,IIr IL' 11;' ":'.L 4711`, :111 :'1}'l •^lz4f?L' I0L1T1i:;1b:1111 'e4 li 111;11',!t'•'.: -,Lc 1 :1L';L' 17t 1.{ ► 1'. ri. 1a1 Lhc ti' ;.._143 .h'. 1 '.II, i;7, ,1',I Iti.ult1.' ! 1 l'I'<tl-'iJ [lt:' [Ile UI34'.Il11 lr�.j '.I'lLti_';'y L'i.[li'�Il ��. .41I I1.1.E1IR: 4 t 1'tll:l' n:, v.L:1-L not :1nai ,,,/oi", ti Ill 131E tTat"11 %01L;': C 1�41,L_4'. 1nci,ease, anti the l:t fable 17'1: Future 7112'1 Wit [tout Project Round.°lhOdl .kIl<$lysis at Uns'ignaiire€L 111110`Scctir,[IS Route 11 & Hmalalal (NI lowerali) Dela {se vee 175.2 AM v c L05 IF IPS 97A ... PM Vic' - tins F HQU- ^ I! ` ::J a,,Dp '.;,;.11 161.5 1.31 F 79A 1_f1 F ..._. O + 1 SR _1r OaC!' _ ''illi -1'i: %:?� I I - 11; ,F7�,;: S> : I 9&7 1.x.7 1-'12 U7 If H 121.1 17.4 1121 0.30 F C R[3lJrP 11 >l 1�11,1,l,i (5) ;nVerall 63-0 - F 93,3 - F 'v ''.�:'1, .:1.h 126.7 1.23 F 1&3 1,.10- F Rot ;'.: L_ `,_: 11:'.: •-.arh 38.6 0.96 E '__2,3 1.19 F 25,3 051 D 15.ti 0,25 C Route 11 & Kuakil•I (o,tierall) 297.2 F 13,15 F :mot•" ., .t 1_'�31:- .','::I1 I . ', ; :11 • : •.:1..^ 235.5 3E;3.4 1.48 1.75 f f 1179.3 22M 1,39 1.46 f F u.'.. 1 =B • •_ 1E.4 0.44 C 71.7 6.95 F 33 Royal Vistas TFAR C) Alternative Mitigatica MPtisures SSFAI inlerna6imill (1) Alterni:]'% L,., ai 1._-,,,ko AiC'ompuismi fliewideiiW�­ cl"Ror'e. [ I and,;wkm:� %-1 kjklr J m. d foi Ili, I t lui-e 'Ili" h,,-,vn in I'able 19. All n1ov(,I1wI-I-. J,11 1 1111 !M �k ji_i I Lane Rc•uh, 1 1 ]Cft-uU!11 011 !__k,,i P­:,.-.,-ct1-(- left turns on Lik;, 441.1 I'l ,% I dc a SI.; III I I I 1'.,l c I: 1,:: I I I ]I tIle ov_. I -11: (1,... 111-11 ChC �J!d [ 10M L, k2f 'A 11. Z17" JI, L+. :1111_<. 11C "V! I 'III I OJILT'11, A1.11 I fi'l'l 1'1-11-. 11011". hiblc, 19: T`uturi- 1104 %Vith 11i'll),ica- Routc, I I ilind 11 -A -f, Isti-ret Left-Tilm Sigral Phasing AlICI-111IGNes Z-Laiw RojtF Lp, F'r,3tp.clp.d Lift Tuui S_gnal F3h,,jj7g uci LALuStrL-vt_ ANI PIM DoIjflsc!r/v4,hj uIr LOS DuIaV jsec/vah1 V/c LOS JRP Rilp 1:'K 1, .4,(O.Si (ove m 11) 1 Fm 11 1::; 1: 11 RM I I B 39.5 16. d C: CIZI-1 D is D 25,3 1-1 1 K. "I - C c T Im F. 0.73 c 21-9 0.85 c 83.3 0.93 F 59,0) 0.8,4 E 44.8 D-16 D 5G.A 0.15 D 157.D a72 E 644 3 3•E9 2-I H rke R(H]Tc 11 1 '� rrm N i vF F, ft Tsars Sig 401 1' haii rg t) 1 [,:3 ku St rp v. t 52.4 147 AM E 62.5 0.55 glhl Do ;a (serjvL- L) 11, LOS -JL ILy jSoVVf1hj V/r LOS lRourp F Likn.ST (nvp -311) 33.2 L. ....... 2_.�- c ---- - - ------ - i2 '1 092 Q 1 0.82 E 6' B I I LjI r. i 7 7 3 0,75 Q.11 c U c 201.8 R c 2. 1 LAI I c .7: 0,N D 34-5 :'.21 c 2-L.mL- Foutp 11. Ili c 11+11 L, r m U- 'I Fj r -i S_.g nal P hii 4J i g :.I I U ka M ru v t APA �[,Wskdvuh:, 'd/L LOS Delayjsec/velli V/C LOS Route I & 1;�ca St (ow i I- in 318 0 11 c H 233 '1 -------------------- - - 1i ��U, T 1. 1 Ls.�, c B 19.5 C".65 6 - 2L2 ------- G ell- c U 1,j L) V,, 1c': ----------- - ----------- JJ F T rr,.Aj: q H: �,.M � L9. 9 0.38 1 --- -------- : . - JT - -- ---- --------- D ------ L1, 67.5 E 51 rIg on 4- LA Pp RauCe 11, 5 14 1 t Ph,75i ri ; on ].,5I,jjt ph_ St,__ Lakto Street t AM PIM Delay �SeLjwh) V LOS Delay jsvc/vnh� V/c LOS Rou Le 1t Laka St I uv+-- ral 1) L.v. 21.2 15.9 6 ]0 R A 11 N�B7h­.jqj 20.2 a 69 c 713� c 1 13 =n1.;= 11 1. B �.? t7 I.L.3 Cl 51 B W f1 51. El - - - - - - -- - - --------------------------------------------------------- - 1.1 1,H I -1,f),. C•, ----------------------------------------------- - . ..... 15.4 CIM D 2 L, J L�pm c L,:..�o WE Le:, 3S.2 3.63 D 311.7 c I Cato WISTimugh-Right 3f.L 0.31 c 30.0 0.34 c 34 Royal Vistas TFAR 55FA7 inlerna6imill I i to, i 'in; +Tfle.-�- A '1 til 7 ) I -C k )l 11 T Wn It .l 17 1-clic lllvE 10 rill 1). 1 "Je, I [:A,- Ir -1-1-1 it PIV-Ick lcs , lei -i -I . it I pIl.:,,- hi L- -1:1,-r}d. -trl; ! Frel'I I L- I I 1 -11 M-1:1:�, 1,,!'; 11 ",.11 - --'k. I ;1•'h e1" "Id :1,� I wi,:�Jl kf0l-C allowilm, llclllnsmvL� left-tatil Plia-sing. lilc widClIll 01 R''Url' I I I`v IAAIAI it 21.-24. 4, Future 2024 With Project Segment LOS AvIci-r-d D 111,[ 11' S, I!Ch',) W R,MUC I ]ULLI,:1-:1 I J,UII I tL' 11, ;IFC Scl?.'lhan .i 4.1 llll ti '-n an LII-b.LrI 1111:1.., lilt' :11— Ay !dWL.IJ :;1:1k /-'d 11111 III%: me,mhoL:Ak,.�- e,� of ( rlh,�ii S:rez,: l-,wil lies. For L I to LOS. caji '%, 1.-. The arterialLOS �Lm K1,-L.nd in Tabl,: . I ibic 211: Fidurc 2024 With 11"r1rJer( Segmt-ii I I .()S Feak � Io i I r IN o il I - --, u u i I, I (To'-,Vi i -i; Ea) l So ut I i b u u i I (y (T -1i K C. � 11-111 u J) Speed (mph) LOS Specd (mph) Los AM PI @k 19.3 c 23.9 c ?M Peak 21.7 c 22.2 c '-it,. of Roule I I opcl'JL:, I C)S� C irl .Ih' I1:7!,11ILound and SCH11111hOlITILl dil]-L�UIMTI difl-liTU-1 ilii ANA --�,.,:ik hours, satisl� —lk:� P)d I %, G tlllj'llt)f 1 (Ai<-nI,er 25 (Zoning). Article -2 (Aklm'lm-,,-tr;jtIon and Division 4 1 X,:n;vl -6 (Concurrency RC(lUill-CRIClItSl regarding, "acceptable .LLk C- 'It ;Ll %, LC­fo[ 15 Royal Vistas TEAR 55FA7 internaiii3nal IV. Future (2029) Mid -Term Conditions — Completion of Phase 2 A. Surrounding Area Conditions Phase 2, 1,; L:\Peciwd 14, he kvr1r1ctcd I,\ 20-N. I --pi ihe full heildoilit 1(t -Year future fi)recast. Phase 2 WHI co -11:1 11 I ).tJ',� I'in€= uI111,1. 1001.111d :'.-ld 1'113s�: I ouibouTid trips :owiuuL:iu use itic Ruyal.Vistas Raudwa-v and Kcitte I I Hversectiuil. Long Wirm 01": 11ti including the Lak.o SlreeL EXWOS_1011. [lit: completion of Alii I highway, and. the wldeninLy (11 ti;,-iit I i om Henry Street to Kameharnella 1111 Road 16111 impmve reg'- %111;k! traffic in the study ap The C-(Wl 1) IVI' On dates of diese proJects are not known. V011131leS '.VOL; 11C I ,IL., LL�I ri.' based on these illlplovclllt.-Ii 11:ti'-,:LLs. B. Volumes 1. Future 2029 Without Project Volumes T hkc p iv. I c w t stu Liv :. I 4, L %\- I tJ I n Kc) n 9 has been CL per . knlk:, . n,,, modcs7 -rc),,Ath. 11DOT ADT counts on Route ) I hcfb,v,2cn N" -illi KL11'lm Dvll,: -itid I Inalialai RoLid didn'l Nhow- Lim inci-c-Lic In VVIliCillal- VOIUFnt�g fTotn 2015 I -o 20i6. ,Iic 2 1=.3 1=�1,ler,O NIL] HighMaYs Lon.g. RLilige i null :portatlon Plan forecasts average daily Ira - C i,. K k) j,,: 1, 11 0 ;i i ll ?1.[_10 111 d 4 X. 0()(1 ~ e h 1, 1 c q in 5. I'li i s is ) pp roxi mate I y cqu a I to a 'n Ml` U J 171.� 10 i = 1 e wtitIIU.ILCd 1111 LL Ie 1U 1 I e S kN 11 L. _i�IC pfqied for flic Jutare ytar 2029 are shown 1. Project Related Volumes The p:--,�poscd VI: ix;',ilcladc !r)_? ii1t.1i:41ii:111., rL:,:JL:I-LIkL. A'I 'I; (11c.scare : e,\PeCL`2L1 10 17L_ L aV, J'lSC t:'l I C < %� I 111 1 ;1[' J'J I'L�: <. Tr'4- s2_L°i L: r,i I _'d :,IV I"11 -.Ile P;_OJIO�Ck I I"IL: I-1 'A were 1;!IIJ 11Lz, f:,L111 JtJ,: h, .'(.:I ITF (10-i neI lic "I LI I -1';l I ill t 1 IOU., I', 1 0" R -Q I I IL-, I'V" I I idc, apir, dS. t4., k', I k)L:_:U:d _kILILM L"lC ;,ULIIC hl-EIL11AU ALM AL IL:,LA II[IIL-:. LL:iLts" I')_ LJ,%C 11:1i ILIIIL,-, 1he indci--indenr v.-I'Alk: to k2-Hi1 :ik: 'rilnw I . voill Pllwx 1 o", I']-, kv nev4 trlp.% ,wrerjtec 1111:1;.v -, JI'C �I­wr 1;-, 1.11, � 21. A I kk -)I: VS I i ri I N I Cd 'I 1-i I IS (. e I I U 1-.1111 C d I k� I't-4 I ic H P I, kxw 2 AM I'M 7111(1 Us( [I'l F OP&I lJJL1;1Ji0r1 Vlqwiiiii-in Nfittli-10111i1► HOLVIill(.� Ln ('1') f). L)', Ln �) L.i 0',, H L i I � _X I U iN X220C. 5 1 fl fl' -- — - -------------------- - -------------------------- - ----------- 89 11C [)tt1 1E7-------- - ---------- — -------- -7 ID f? T Tota[ number of trips gen:i;iicd X D`�Nclhii,�,. I III[:, II , I I 1L J I id t -_J rh'')': L; r! 1;:}" E d it 1 n n (ITE 2016) f n r Ladd Use 220 36 Royal Vistas TZAR 5SFAI internatii3naf — --d Analv2ed Ptak HUur VOI4 MPS � YInahzed � unsignalized IN rntersem on � � AIV! (PMI (veh. rj `��/ Intersedion �,_./ Intarsertion P �� Figure 11: Future. 2029 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 37 Royal Vistas TXAR" 5SF147 inlerno6imill The: pnij~:c1 1.-1!11LI `ri[11' .VL -TV c:I5t11111i!C(I 'ICck�rdin"; Cc} L'NI::'. 1 '-' I <IVt1 I X E.I111C' 1 IC' x'_`:'1'1+.'II `,:? 11-K L: I)t�t}k'r['11;iI,L1:I.111111 "Ivet' I :,Illi C1kl!1„ti.115 iFer1 OCC -1-t- tlnyil t+ lIt![IIiM the i11III'11 ^rrcrl'I k I'.trj111.IIIL'II Filt',11"4• Irht.+l.`ld '1'14'x" ti.'llI' ;.';'IW111E4 titli4'FI11L* ,11 Ih,` ',YJI �`ltii:i:. �':.;.;'•1':1t 1t Rk ',11;- 1 1. It &:it f9L1�. ;i e17.L1114.'ll lU Laico SILL:cl Is 111ovaicd. I'L.-I'L § L'I -i,Il (11.'1LIIL;)tlIAJ 1'Lll[lC) 11114 Itiilllr.� I>-' I1” Ll :III :1'IS dIII-lf1'<< Ilii nes; I, hkIL:`.'ti, ti!]li L l It ll.I i.' I` -"I::. .iItio INN pioN i[4L ! L:.II:IILI I,° 'I 11�1PO7-1 1a 11111:Q -S :111.41 drivi r,,yVi Ili II.INL 1() Nkal11 i01 -:L :':I�y :iL I'IL::,i� }-4:clnll'e>114e1 1�111,i� � 1,31:sti Oji"'1VwaW;ly': "1 tiC i-LLtL:I'C ,{Yj[j -M, C9.?a1[i'LUJI-tItiClll k lilk I 0 -1:,: 1 411.11'.' 'W-4 lane Ct)1111 or.'1tion. Figure 12 shows the Phase 2 Inbount1 Pl-We'J :' I,e -0tQd r1I7{k LIit1 1 .-A IlC;1 dips. Figure 13 slows the Phase 7 uuil.11kmd proicc[ i rnd cliti[rilrlu vtl trips. 2. Future 2029 With Project VaIumes Phase 1 (Figure 9) and Phase 2 pro-icci related trips (I=igute 12 Lil'.d FILL lre 13) t�-crc Lil�dc l to '11, Fu[Ltw� 2029 Without Project vc fumes (Figure 1 1 ? to estimate Future 211'`� Wil h I'-1 i -o 1o�r L: Figure 14). 38 Royal Vistas TMR SSFN7 in[erna6innf legend } rro1k Hour volumes Analyzed Project Signalized Unsigna'"nd Siap Sxen # A [rv, [vehAr} Intersection Driveway � `n"rsezt!"D' & Intersection Figura !i: Prase 2 inbound Project Reiated Trigs 39 Royal Vistas TMR SSFN7 in[erna6imal Le�eaarl v;w Hour Volumes Analyzed ___�. Project � Signalized � Unsigna'"szed i stop Sxen (Ye 11f} Intersection Driveway `nurse t "�' InterseCtaara Figure 13: Phase 2 Outbound Project Related Trips 40 Royal Vistas TMR SSFN7 in[ernatii3nnf legend } rro1k Hour volumes Analyzed Project Signalized Unsigna'"szed Siap Sxen # AN [rv, [vehAr} Intersection Driveway � `n"rsezt!"D' & Intersection Figure 14: Future 2429 With Project Peak Hour Volumes 41 Royal Vistas TEAR 55F147 internatii3nat C. Future 2029 Intersection Traffic Operation Analysis I ' Lr 1� 1 11.s1 1110 ,r"Lltl r ,010:11`.'11 vs1S. u" I III1:1"' �L.''1 7k` i'U:1C'.'. tll":Illc�;l �i.ncl w '1 71211 1,.`ti'175._ Ila IL i I. Future 2029 Without Project Intersection LDS Tho ''10''i) �� 11io1l! proiec, I111!'I"ection i}1}t: L'1:31'S'rl :'ilr S ] ;11151 .Ik'i'I':is.t' ,1,-IaY (in l' lti NT Vellic'1e) Were dct4n't ln,i ',- ilw AV -,,n;' I'M )eak .:1clii..l.,.. ,':,`1rtL' 11'cl t1t tiCl"4'C'L L.. _Litt` -7 :)tCLr i llt'11. Tl:i ti:l;i&LI 1-4}lk :"I(,11L,ILC:+ Illi" '1'LI':III I:1 -.til':,_ 11:)Tl r, lilT, VL: I:1::l.ti IIUlt ope;'clic iL'. 1 I.)1 T L)I-1101.,L ... 11')Jl 11�,r'IICtI I'I'I L: 14,1k. "4 ItiII1%10 11;-L-. :-I .'1a7;7t1,.:..\ F a) Route 11 and IPalani Po ad. 0Vera ff Intersection LOS - CIC (AM/FM) All " i7 5v..5irci.11+ :II ISL' ,15'I11tI',`L'iI IIFL'I`�C.'II:mti lY I;L'I.: ' I ' '53'1'11 II,--kinI 1tuakI-:-,IIIIc,I I ;:'.7111-ol':".:L',' i as r) or better during, AM and PM 11o.- 1, I" SILr, b) Route 11 and Henry Srreer. Dut�r'afi inter5ecrfon LOS = CID (AM/PI14) AE _ilL`.5;`:175".i it 1'.1,'' ,L 11=lliL;' :,1tL`.:'.0:.1;'L:`•;51 e ;7{1 I, 15 5'sttllL1.1� D ur hL.'tltir 4iLJ JLL AM anK: C': 11 1 uLII t) Route 11 €raid Huafalar Road (Northr At I: iti III:1L)I IJ.'t'. I11.c1'•k-:I"i o3l til RouIe I 1 %Vi111 HLi:rla]ai Street (jio1-th), eastbound Ie 11 tun it ag, Ilio eine llt :11'.tl �1 + rQ rl7wlvcIv) :11141 lomz dQ1jY,, during holh AI'v1 Hmt I'M pQ.Ln hoI,Lr ary Ju t()1)1L' 11 1111-1 L1I:.'.11 1 L" 1 .II`l4-:1 511 , +7.1%e I l . The m ") r anti other rniiior fine vemenu operated at Rcceptab[e Iev,eIs of`S,'CAAs: {IL11'lri:_ flat AM 4'1Id PNI peak lhOUrs. adj Route 11 and Ht alalai Roordl (Saurh) At Of R01-1te l l With HLialealgi Road (,south), Westbound left tannin- movcinent h-1, LOS F i't . L ' 11 '? and 0.60 reslnctively) and lung Jclaya during both AM an LI PM pock hours are due, I Ii_ l; Ihr;5.1;_':1 It11nes on Route 11. The 4,20'.;6171}ulld L'iullt Ludt alis, operales at 1. OS F (v/c o1 .74) during the A k'1 1 .r '', llt!IIL. The major and other minor moveluents opel•� it (] at accepmble levels of service during the AM _11 c. I",,1 11k 21k hour's. ej Roate .11 and Pu tip uocln u .Street. 0veralf Intersection L05 = 8/8 fAMIPM) All rrto> cI� Iw:11�- 4:- III ,L_,:,,I1,.kA, II-1v:I�,CL11:11.S of Route II with Puapuaanui Streutresulted in appropriate LOS D {)] '•1'15`1' :'.111175' 1'41 ill_t; I'M pc;ik :711L1T?, f1 Roure 11 and Kuakin i Highway I 1 I 1 I wiIh KlIi!Lkinl F1iL!h"t av, rorihhotLnd 1c1) 11Lmi11 LT -&0V421!1 Uni IILI'* 1 CIS 1'. 1'5.5' o t5 `.111 :111.'. 15 I'.! 11:'1,1` `1 LlUring the :N\} 13s':Ik 1 c1ir 11,1'. 11".Is Fllll':I:,' i 65!11._ IION oil ''.I 11011' '1 L1 k.;I ,I,'o I; 1'7,''II 11'11 14,.311 10 P;-:ip I,:;111111 `+1''w::1 I'ti,':.,rl I7:_ 4 -I -I4`: I'71t"P' ti,cI:kni Tlw lllu:11;1rj, '11-L: 1,:u TIAR rtA%]LitcL1 tl':L CdL,C.'-. LI' -Al IC'i- it 11-11 t111I1I l ULikilli II1�II 4'Lly til PULI17l.L1. 711 S1R`,2t LtL7d UrIl.CI' iII'�'.'It 11 roads, Q) Route 11 and Lako Street. Overolf Intersection LOS = DIC (AMID ) 1 t 1..0 SIL°.11;ilGf L1 Ilitel ,tfcI15:11 III [l',mle I I .,A Illi 1.}1k L, S5 rcd, t,l'.t ;,L1 1.1111AP1.111d lell t1 -1' ,'.Iltir(:'. :-. ut _ I t 1 `1.�C I'Il �Xl Ll Irl,w r1.e AN -1 I,r:11,; ''1�:1ur The t'aY li ound lett IU1 :PId %lelkIIL`lMO ;1111111 :1:'11{' ii')ti",L',' t1t LOS E c�I° t„r'I4° .I..Irin lik: AM 21nJ I'M pc4 ik ltu'urs, Tliiti {Eti'In ti i- .l n ihl ii d iia rlic rrlal'Ir4 :.Ir1,l rll; -,plit phasing 1,'I' 1'14 I -LII„) t1' !"l 211-rf,::;_?lcs, All other movctnCllt; LIE I A0 S41 -Ci Or-U1,1tC ti, 1 OS D01- Iii : 0' both Inti,:}, kul:. . 42 Royal vistas TIAH Table 22: Future 2029 Wil houl Project I Werseto ioll I �evej or Set-, ic(. 43 AM PM 0 66 0.48 D 0 79 049 D 43 Royal Vfsfas TFAR 55FA7 interna6imill h) Route 11 andMomeharnehiR III Road. overall intersection LOS= 13IC(AMIPM) All mov�,,nlents a- tl-i,, ----,natized irlrsections of Route 11 with Kamchnnicha ILI Road resulted in appropriate LOS D or betiin, during AMand PM peak hours. 2. Future 2 D29 With Project Intersection LOS 1.1(11 -, Mid 't,' I, -, pL-r vehicle) were I "I 0--N �Vl-[) 1 1 _:.7 T) L� T L T, LX,�-' ' (.Llay (in Sk�Lond, I J liar I I . i i - ; I I I peak ' :1 11r- I'•, =- 1;:; .- ; I I! d C I I i -ow 1 n d I co I c ., IIIA ov cT-,i 1 r 1, ers Q Q I 1011 'J'At nF D)kI or F,,, li:Jil: In yellow, Synchro ouq)i[t iq ]it Appendix a) Route 11 cndPofan� Rood. Over-all Intersection L05=CIC (AMIPM) A 1 :11 -1),` 11,&m,cd in «i 4c,,l i,)li ; of Rome I I with Palani Road resulted in appropriate LOS D OF bCI IC IF &Aing A,\ f P \ I rc-mk I - t i iir� b) Route 11 and Henry Street. Overall intersectio,, LOS -, CID C (AMIPA4) 1 1 -)S 1 1,:" im �i ojpcnii,:�, m LOS 1- J;ir m-, 1,�c i"d penk Imm- I IIS` 11.1121UY .-Id I ll,.','- I I 1 C1L`1: ','.4 1E' I 1;14' M C FO A St 1, L: Ia7L.11c.1VO [ I I I I.,I I LT L'I Llteil I,_ 14,Ik,L1 l".,1,1N. L. D I,' J k I 1'j 1- I.IIk 1''x'1 P C,'l irl III I L I F 11,1" -,I 4o I III C o1 5 V Chic I I I I 1 -1 I III I C. L�lI I C�, ihout thL: -)w 1i7Ilk i:w .�2� ".'n r- T -L 1%) 111 3. C 0 11 ,. L 1,: �ci. Th -1, i:"-1 I 1.-'l Ili ifie m e., i liat 111' 1,:tll: ;•11'.:1'.' lr4 I I,, -111 ill -!,rok nid (.,I i iri,: :ind If -,L spl 11 pli:i �k:, A11 4alK,7- o�i �,ii I :I' I 11t` signahzed of Route I I with llciu-y Stied .-esuhed In appropriate LOS D of Dc°ttk-T w'-'Urltlg and FM pealc I)OW'S. c) Route 11 orad Hualakri Road (North) At the unsignaliz,, � in-ci-qccdozi of'RI-mto I I with Huai, -Llai i Ilot'LI)1. lift. tUlAILZILIF jjj(7x'C711w.Jjt haw LOS 1; iL: ,,C"- 1 -5 iMd 0. L.,:,�po'n Ev I X) Lind 1 kill U ti� 1`1Y.S J kT' -1 --1 b A I \1 1-ind PX I pL:ak 110UUN arZ due to !-I I ull ill 1-ou" 11 vol uni Ws ull Ro: I tA: i I . , I IIc n -r -Ju 1' :11', orli, - r I 1 1'0 l' 17 [':1 lVd at acceptabl,: lk:v�:Is Of SCINIC� dll-ligkl" 11:C AM elld I'M peak ItOLI!'�. d) Roure 11 and Hualalai Road (South) At thc misjgim I wed !laerscc101`l 0C I Z0 Lit C I 1 0 ;t h HLIal a ,Ii Road (Soitth). I I r Ci I I I i I I..-! :I, o,:-m1Cl1t 11a, L,0` 1; o CO -42 -Li i : d 0. !b P C C I I %;C I y ) al Ld I k I ]I,-, d �. 1,1 dH'I.Ll. [';)tl-j :� ",I U I'Al 1',%,1 L,m ,IIL' due -�LT kjL� J�JCT to hio 1111-, 111;'El ':21 011 KOUTC 1 1. HIQ Wk:N`IbULll--.- 1,11,1 C� ; I 1 0 S F �y/c o - 4-1 the AM liour. The mqjor and OU'lel Mmor nao%-en-1nO� k 1 11 acccptable h-'Vels of klt,L Ing the AM ai C Wdk e) Route 11 and Puap vaun u i Street. Overall h7tersec tio n L05 = BCIB C (A MIPM) T'he southb(aujid left tui �i . , 1,1 7 . [.c )�1 1"-' C'%Lll J1.1-1 AM -1-JId P"\-1 110-H. "I'l)e N('Stb0LMd IC11 (Lim operates at LOS b duflrig : 1w MI pt:ak Wur. T4w dc lays arc Jui: to the ;:yLr Ic Ili. 1-1 -r I cll I ki rn % o1w li-� are low and should clear every cycle. Route 11 and Royal Vistas Roadway At the pivpo-:,~,l :--7�0' IL I I fl-,-, V,,�taN Rk)Lldway- thL, Will 11)01 L:111,:111 J':011: KOWC : I LU -J, RI'Y:111 VL>LtA J6:!,kd--%d%- ininimal dehr- -.:n of, 10 to 13 Lmll- k-wi p,.:,ik lio-ii-,. The 'IC A'I P.1111i:1.� rio',L: i,Eiir Itas LOS F ilL : 1 aild 0.52 1 ,- ii M? -7 11oh A\I 129 VC`111'�IC�1) JlAl JAII I I J%ML dUC D I'll -Ill L11011.111 44 Royal WtQs TFAR 55FA7 inferna6imill vkil,imc�: on Row,: 1 1. 2 oft lum,, cxil3ng Roval ViNk"S ill LA�?10 S-11WI I0 JUCCN.S Route 11, The I I i I -I ,n, I In ii fimctior,;, :w .-ep I 43[y. "J th �J]j ',I %',"Ti U!, I.,v of (:,-I y rcl. % III tile A\I jlo.ik how- m'... (4 J,-hy -,-r v0,1J(, In I 1� PIM p,-.1, I 1-i' 1'j.: 01' :11j Dill..'' M".Mfl' RILACMLI'.', JL -.—:QUHC 1?1 tI'ViCLdUlilhOie AM mid P\I jiva7\ g) Route 11 and Kijakim Highway At i',C I vlih Kii-kl:-11 1s1-, lio-1111--kw-ld IL. -:1 111111 1[,-, -1:o-.Cmejnt 11:1, [.()< 1-: I (- 1)[ 11 'Pl%pand km,- dm-'!nF- Ike AM [leak hour I i---li T Route 11. Al. o -"h -i, 11"io%e111.,11y ;1i .11ver.11-fle lev,,Vof Service 'Aw ;IIIJ :'VI 1'„:113 hoi:1,,; h) Route I I and Lako Street. Overolf Intersection LOS = 01C (AM/PM) At tR-,e fflersec�roll Si: P,011k-, I I W'th L1IZ2 z -ft tuni opt�rites at LOS F (vlc X11 I f 101 ti,.Unl I,, -11LANI while sc-vo-A 1. liku �' I I 4,1 w, I se, 111L ckla-, :,, attnbll[LJ LO the 1:111.1 %,11UMC 21111 tfi4 ill,: I akk: si:,::i aivou,:jlc”, All oLllci Ir o%e-me,rits ;it L,'ALI �II,Ue+ [loill 0 Route 11 and Kamehameho Ill Road. 0 veraff intersection LOS = SIC (A MIPM) AH ]rovemtiits diLving hoh peak hour, operate at LOS D or bomr. 45 Royol Vfsfas TIAR I'a I) I e 23. Fa I ure 2029 IN X111 Projeel I wersvelion I evd uf Serike SSFAI 3nlerna6imill F, r5n FT 1111 Jeid4 " M! CNE 'I) A Pdl v/c LOS 43 NT 5 RbHtL Ll& 1l.31c,ni Rd :LjVL�-:Ili 23_L 0.45 c a 272 9 D U.67 0 D Rox h I T 0.51 B 17.3 8 D-77 D Q.9 11 CL25 0.51 c u 34.3 51.7 c D C 39.3 D D I' -'b4 it L, Ll & WI)fy ST I �v.' "allj 31.5 01.69 c 34.9 0.72 c I "i I . 11 0,61 5?,8 D 7) Cj I L; -j A:..: D.4 c 32.2 1.74 c r. 1 .1,10'.. DMUHC 23.i 45 1 1. V4 c 34.f, D.7r, c I Hs .......... I ''I TI, �,h 0-36 C 27.3 D.2 c 4.47 D 3E.5 41 0 - 058 37R D57 11 ^foql' RielitI Rutih-- Ll Hi dl -I a; (N) juwLr.34� -1 2 L�'l 17 Z7.2 0-01 1 c - 33.1 L8 E).m c 124 D.21 8 13.5 D. LS B WR 3 3.15 F 1,55.4 057 RE) Utp. Ll 0, H,j al Mu.Sj (ovL rail 3.0,1 - - 2.4 - -1 J L-- I L 14,1 0-17 8 325 0.12 a 247.1 0L42 F 400.5 016 F Rout(. Ll S, Punnuarinui St ovmilll 27.2_ q - 0-37 1 0 322 2& 15 - 0.64 C. c 1 19.9 1123 13 14.9 0,46 16 2 0132 c 415 1-00 D j=all a,67 J 39.7 0.66 D b 'I"ugh 28.X em c 29.6 0.07 c: 32.1 0.33 c 31,4 4, 17 21I..H 017 c 2r, h 007 C RD u L r li 9, R uV:4 Vs st8 ral 1 I 3.6 - - 24 - RD a t E 1.1 1. fl, IL, L,.(J.l 6 12.5 L). 15 149.1 D61 F 2 )52 qtr; al V.,I;,, ,116 il, 27.9 D.43 0 Rciuti LI&Kl;sklmHwvj0veMl) r a 2.6 iso L. t 0 1 1 L C -;,l 54,2 4L98 F ]9.7 5 s c ^ n D.OD A "'i.0 ').M A Route 11 & La ku St I uveral i 1 N:� Lc m I 1) All - c 16,2 0.13 6 22.3 ,^..1G c n. v I 7� r!-. i, r ri G&3 D.97 -j 25.$ R5 -...L) X. 1 S 3 b. 11 p 1 r"4 Tl- 107.8 Lino F 34.4 D. 71 c 2511 0,73 c 763 D.88 c 173,4 IIN F 00.8 D k Lk P r :I - 1 0-21 D L,5.1 D.16 E '::.'•:I;. Ri:: I 6-S.6 405 E 72.2 0.73 53.3 4 32 E 54.0 0.43 Route: Ll F.3m 111 Fld I iM., ml 11 A5 a 27.tj - c rTI. 079 D X3.8 0.79 0 A i V.! I 15.5 4L67 13 24.P D,77 11 S U IL .3 SD.G 0.51 0 -in-F?.un ha r� I I - --. I 16.4 44. 3.41 3.98 B D.3 V, -1 LA Ti,i,r..,, 1 . q 1 .3 51.8 7.66 D Royal Vistas TIAR 5SFA7 inlernaiii3nal 3. Future 2029 With Project Mitigation Long tern improvemoms kic1i.3L-1iini 11w, Loki) " -.4ri:1,l: -,fio (7,--l--tion of A. I i I I'[,-- I I 1vidcning of Route I I fio-.ii I I ciir,, S' I CCI to K -LI I I II �1 III :6,:1,1 %,.-I I :1 I I I,: ovT.. .11 1.1-, -tL41% J.%. area- The completion dates o �- tlmse pr(�JeCtl', 2Ye 110; 1 1, 10M 1:. 11. {ILL I n I L -i -I 1 1.. di cvt-',:i : I i riin 1p.uuns �,N eve 0) Troffic Sigma! Warrant Anolysis 'S I 1-11:;1 r To rh I 'T I I, ,,orld flw 1%.1111:)1, Ch left tum.% n1'Qn1le at F 111 1 1 M�-bot; pL"11C :It 1,-,CsT I I I ii:,, ::' Li i Road irii,- :1-14I -I, L: 14c,y- I Vistas dvivcwy. PLr.ik- I Io tir, vo I -LlrnLr!..,Itf -I C jig� I !,31 were (',d.Uatcd I_L, -()'L)24 hovvq thc' P sL�,,.k-Hour ject coodluo;ic L I 11 029 �w. [I": lvolLcl. I alilt 24: I`ulurc 2029 Pcak--Utpur Warrant6 \ t) ]I •71 7 1 1 [1 1111 � l,'?JI;L /-1-4 [ I, il k, 1 s -VC I I t, nq wi I I ;irisfy the Pe:l k I I I I I I I 17-Arl I L'A11 Cl' 1-0 11111 ;.'Iv I I-zod 111 -+_- -;;:C :ol IL, L11Yti 1%2 ��, I I i F i ow ovc I: dday. 1it-- i i i i w i i i,.,t I 1..'11 vo Ila-) wS at I I I-1; I I I i k tj and PL 1..' 11 LLtIiL I :-I L 1,: 1 C.dll � cd v I ow <'.IIJ ].-A.- vc'd ZL'w', Ll I C :,A LTJ -'.t I I I LIC I : I uwer thall Li� �Ll -"-k, I L11 L:A J,hlvs. The 2009 MUTCD state,,: "AL MI i1I1WFti;C!'L011 Wifll fiiEfll V0111-inic of'letl-ttirll tr,,i17"1C fl-om the rnalor "treet, Illi 'A ILr RIIA lyl LB. be PC11"01111CLI Ill L: 1`11HIH 01 MI.tit Ll,:T'-; I h%.. hI.L I k: M. -I I ..I -111111or-Niv,,01- v(11111110and I I &rc-ill:�I - on rhe -ticl is tht volume'. The Rok-II I ar., I kU I L I n I i�-, I I i ii % 11�; I Jilt] lej-; 7L,1-11 at LOS E duriii,-! i;i,: A'\ I peak flour. For 1s11, 111,2 1 '' 'I I `11)01 IIAi -L--fi I 111 -1 '.:111.'1..` lC11I Cm:,W, 1 -111x:.€' U 1') 11 I'011C I I VO I L I Ill 12 , .II 'Al [lit! C)[)])( Y� 11 P-7 tiOI � III 'A I '.k I % 0 ILI I I I � It: I I Yc! 1'1:-. (1 ' C 11 I I ',I 11[' 11 [11 I b I i -I g If �i -, - k Id our vda rrant Wdr ['Vifl I a:L-C;i b0ca L ISV SUfficient d; ,-;i wii Li aviiikible 41 rtd tri g: vi, ii r i rlil l u- t i i. ri of I (,I !I(A J'i lllter&eCtffir, dinuld lwcaj-,idoiod -vid niw L,. -,ted for I 'Lri�fric signal. 47 Pei.� Hoor Warrant 2029 With Od"t AM PIV Project Mriior�A i - i or Vv� r rAr- i ? Wjor V i ri 1), IN r r'c) n t hj:lk, .1i (N) 1,95 4z. NO 434 1 f'I I'd C) �2 I-) N() 4Q Id H4vy 2490 0 NO 4 8 P4,:,< Hot;, Wirrirfl 2 OE' Vi I h F I c JC. CA AM PIm PA;Jor Minor Wr rar I ? Major Mi 6dr WPrrantl (N) 2) 10') 1 � IVCD 25 O 10 N ;J -d 1,� JI (S) 2317 9 NO 2594 14 N0 Vist�,: F)w -940 29 IN 0 )2113 12 I N0 —v -< L a -< I ni I lw 25,15 0 NO 2565 CI VLA \ t) ]I •71 7 1 1 [1 1111 � l,'?JI;L /-1-4 [ I, il k, 1 s -VC I I t, nq wi I I ;irisfy the Pe:l k I I I I I I I 17-Arl I L'A11 Cl' 1-0 11111 ;.'Iv I I-zod 111 -+_- -;;:C :ol IL, L11Yti 1%2 ��, I I i F i ow ovc I: dday. 1it-- i i i i w i i i,.,t I 1..'11 vo Ila-) wS at I I I-1; I I I i k tj and PL 1..' 11 LLtIiL I :-I L 1,: 1 C.dll � cd v I ow <'.IIJ ].-A.- vc'd ZL'w', Ll I C :,A LTJ -'.t I I I LIC I : I uwer thall Li� �Ll -"-k, I L11 L:A J,hlvs. The 2009 MUTCD state,,: "AL MI i1I1WFti;C!'L011 Wifll fiiEfll V0111-inic of'letl-ttirll tr,,i17"1C fl-om the rnalor "treet, Illi 'A ILr RIIA lyl LB. be PC11"01111CLI Ill L: 1`11HIH 01 MI.tit Ll,:T'-; I h%.. hI.L I k: M. -I I ..I -111111or-Niv,,01- v(11111110and I I &rc-ill:�I - on rhe -ticl is tht volume'. The Rok-II I ar., I kU I L I n I i�-, I I i ii % 11�; I Jilt] lej-; 7L,1-11 at LOS E duriii,-! i;i,: A'\ I peak flour. For 1s11, 111,2 1 '' 'I I `11)01 IIAi -L--fi I 111 -1 '.:111.'1..` lC11I Cm:,W, 1 -111x:.€' U 1') 11 I'011C I I VO I L I Ill 12 , .II 'Al [lit! C)[)])( Y� 11 P-7 tiOI � III 'A I '.k I % 0 ILI I I I � It: I I Yc! 1'1:-. (1 ' C 11 I I ',I 11[' 11 [11 I b I i -I g If �i -, - k Id our vda rrant Wdr ['Vifl I a:L-C;i b0ca L ISV SUfficient d; ,-;i wii Li aviiikible 41 rtd tri g: vi, ii r i rlil l u- t i i. ri of I (,I !I(A J'i lllter&eCtffir, dinuld lwcaj-,idoiod -vid niw L,. -,ted for I 'Lri�fric signal. 47 Royal Vistas TZAR 5SFAI interna6imill 'I able 25.- F tili ! 2029 Peak -Hour N-%arra lli �1,7t1 Without Projeci ANI Peak Mur Wdrrar,t PM Major minor Warrant? Ma -or ".I..,I tM1vaI 017 Kuakrn Hw 945 602 Yui 1157 rf_ 2O29With1 Pralect C PeakHOUrMI I'r Ir AM P1, ma'pr IM!nQr Warrant? MaiQr MmOf Ad 711 FII Kuakin Hwy 477 W2 YIES 1,ST,R 341 Yf": The Route I I and Kvakini Ill liway intL:rwL:crion ;,viA satisfy the Pcak I iokii ' a17'l ilr MMI -':?til. I :satiwfaction o4_a r.raffic wanrar-_r tilc;•r:s 1101 rC4',UIre ofa tr'a f"Fi 1 LLQ --3-1. I h,} i. -,,ay -was analyzed as a srgnalized 1.t1terse holt tk'Irli v,-;60Ul :1 71-1,;11)(}11114 lr1'r 17hu. mg fow- tltz� H'L u -C 20-19 W1111 Project condition {see 'fable 26). Table 26: Future 21129 NL ith P1 oied — RoWe 11 ajid Kiiakini Higimay Left -Turn Sigual Pliasirtg k1tvrnatil(rS Z•Lan e Route 11. P'ratceted Let Turn Signal l'ha'�i-1g L)II ,(Lakini riigftway ANI PM 0121.1y LOS Delay ISeC}lrtrlt Vic LOS Route B7 & Nrt„kini tfw3 �overagl�_ 41 s C z1.5 C 9,1 ;!Ir'r1 I Rh C Irr ,y� - H;,- :'A%;Baprroa ', 7-1:1r1i, Rpti,rr. 11, PQ—iik6vr* Lr Ft Turn Sig=coil PI°�i::ing ia:i Kwk,ri 1119:'Mby ANI PM ticl)y 1scC. vcl,h. vie LJ!, ue'ay (Sec,lvo h) u t LOS RCUIC' :1 & 1{ulkini Hwy 27..4 I j.1 A K:a I :: .:! I I'%r _"1 rrrl 1- KL'. L�k I I . -,vay Le L 'Epm:odi IA U. 0.�!i .................... L, L'_ 1 I.; _ i?r D. F1 1l Z L Irw Ru\ILu 11, Pratt+Pcrrrl LultTeru SIja.',allyl-a- l ng 6:'Y K uJi kr r 111ig*i%%ray ?.h1 I'm LSChay (StcvL-h Vff LOS Lie, -a $t�C!veh Vic WS Route .1 livakini Fiwy L)VCr]'1) 3 G � 4.7 A Kuak.m H¢ hw-'r, I B a rp rilaCv. I1:. U L% 7t I'lic or••mdl rit'1ay at this ill Mrl a 1.1 ircr�`..wk' 'I-1 hoill 1,r :1.; Ir .. v, hi L.• rl', rs `II lu:•r"1cl w:li it"r .ti i I still operale at LOS E o :, s° :i`r �i;j alrernarr� lt is r,',:r 1=1r.1.::r{ r .. -Jia1 wr.•r.4 1 1), infer'secfioll_ 7 Single Peak Hour warrant Wdr c°v all,.stc ri bf,Catrsf sr1#ficien# sJt>t,r wwi available tjnd to give ran Indic;56in of whether or not an intersectiw, _ inuld k1r cca tilr3er, d grid r',r,r: tined for a Lri�ffic signal. 4F, Royal Vistas TXAR" 1bf Alternative Mitigation Measures 5SFAI inlerna6imilf (t ) Altemi:]'%c,., Lako S;r, c? A'C'{?Tr1Ylt11'lsmi flie 1ldei111'.1_'.t:l ftm:`e. i I and ,;wluzj:^ a l l LIII'I It11:Lti111'.' a "1 I . ll;tr'-,': -1 .I' I,I:`. m. d foi I h, I t:1111 -e V, 1 1-, i'IUIk'l' ;hi7wn in I'able 27. All I11C v(,11w 1-1-, ',F'11 :I , "'llw"<; 11;} ;91) �k 11 _`i I Lane kf•L,,h, 11 '.lits`. 1 eni-I*.,:', ti IC, t -u::'11 ph�-l�ing on L ;k,,i '.,tr4.: 1'::': t'1 ,. Ieft turns on L -,i k; r1: uI.I 1:11",.IIL it ti1I'_.:II I-1`.,114`',iLIL=1; I11 rhe ovemII Lliltikk. 17',11 11 l:l:`:ILI1',11:iI +t'4�1' 1.11:<` ;11 I, IIf:C I t �1 I til wr cl,Llifl I.; } f �jI)lt '7: I littlt'i• 211 2i 1 'ith Project- Route 11 and Lakin Street Left -Tern Signal I lmsin;; Allel'nali' CS Rnt;=ie11,!'ratoctr.dLeft I err Si},im'. Phasing; un Laku Street" ,4h9 Del (le�G1ve111 I'M u/r LOS Delay {sec/VLelij �,,1/L LOS Rf}w I, 4:akn.51 {auFr;+III 45.4 D 24.2 C -'n .r 11 hLP-fL 11 �'%H 1hrt7rl h ku,. t 11 St1 .ere 1 161.2 41,2 67.7 0.1? 0.95 0 -as fi -1994 -l.K8 er fr_ s1 r)Llf 11 .` 1 mull,^. 2.3 4-76 C 23.3 0-86 C L_7Kc =8 Lx! f L 1CL3.9 LOO F 78.5 Q.86 E L-, rI� >:a r,r:I t1,1 I] r1'6,. LI! I ii'..91 I1.7: E 7R8 4-73 E ;r Ea f�ugl,-k 0 h 0.51 r fD j 0-fiiQ E 2 Lane Route U, Perrrssive Left. Tum Signaf Phasing on Lakc Street AM PM Ofel.�y{Sec/veia v/+: ins nHlay (secJv?n) I VA- 1#15 Route 1 & Lako St dove rally 41-5 Ll 23.8 - c "cL:c111L,b.-'- 17.1 0.13 3 16.9 0-15 B 11 !•.h ' 411 t., 71 !r :':I P.;, ., I I ...'. Ir(.: LI 11; ; : %I..o- L1,93 ...0'9z _ . 11 +: 1:1 82 C ........ I, L.G-# ............ iD.$ 0-96 L c 23L6 0.7$ L 7. ::11.8 0.64 D e_aw 7-3 C.11 _.3 0.11 C LAID Y•' .I 1 .,::: 4 r: 1= ---------- -�,I € 0.28 0 ---- 2. Lanz Rout❑ 11, Pruf-Pr'r,rl Lcf't Turf' SignaPha,ing ult Lak,u Slrett A PM Delay {4er; uP i vic LASS Delay sec/veh1 v/c LOS Routf:' I' I a 5t �ovc rflly I I `,1:11 34. C.97 C C 244 - C 16 Li 20.0 0.82 B t t I 1 :' _ `I e:rl.'c I I ?:, ' -1rru,"-. r ::' 1 _'1 11 6.92 D 23.5 4-68 C _-1::.6 19.7 0.75 B 24.5 6.95 C. 64.2 0.86 E 61,0 6,72 c 45.4 0.71 1] 52.? 0.25 C7 4 9- 9 4-40 O 50.5 0-34 p 11x : :"+',-' :..a t" P ,1.1 57.5 EL47 - 59.8 0.5.9 E 4 -tine Rn:lle I], SPlit PhFvdMg On L:ikr1 f'uNFt 1)e1ay 1512L/WaIII AM Vic LOSE Delay (SCove;l1 PM W.L LOS Route I' & I aka 5t Eovcrall 22.6 - C 16. E, 3 :•:C.L.r1I'•,I+Iq I:) 4.11 6 a R ri'I ','. I I '•.t, .=h !I 0,74 C 13.8 L7-64 9 1-1 C.%= 32.5 0.T C ;,cn r8 1:: 1,_d -F 7 C 1•' 75.5 4.74 G 1�kryVJHli:ll Lalo'1d6F1} ,.,,.' R u1'.L '%.� '.1 ti I�:.: L:..;`: C X3,1 30.2 06L1 0-34 C C 49 Royol V sfas TIAR SSFA7 interna6i mcaf 11e ri'irt !c` :1. 1,`.1. !J : r'? 7r, ill Fi .�' .'lr!' :'r'r+•.r+l r'rr l .`inc4° (ATA, 2017) recomrl eel,, t?iat apprvi. cbes III ill do 11 co Il:lW :!.;I4'k ,I,:ic' .'rti 1 17 I.;i ,,1pL'4', :� 1,I °r�•t°tit:, I,'li-I,Ir I' 11113SC 41;47u1c' I);. t I`Iw' I'Lkr J,'01d :I I�it'1t115,tii1'ti tctt-trlII1-3I111sc Is l:;li �.II.','Ak. I..ti 'tii1tit110tii.IkI il.'.1)I•.5, 411 •r'?1:1 il.4r.;IJkL: 11:r.I{I 't ,I114i,cd bcf6rc [;wlsi Lcrllig allirx lT1 ; F7erriti s3�' Ili-I.Ir° 1711 t:alS�. i It ,t iilLlliI: ; o1 ir'. ury i; i.tLtlti'.I II 4. Future 2029 With Projekt Segrrlent L05 1rlk:1 1:-,I I 0S waw ar1:1x%"-w4d in S%1i�Iiru on Inc}Iuc : 1 1'rorn l Iua1.:I,_i {.10F1II'l t1' _ :'.,0 S.r1_w;. ';1 Irc -.iglial 17ed in`e'-ti,-c� om are less tlimi 2.0 mi apart, t11e facility Lhould be 1:1 ed a" :w 11 r 111 wCre'f:::'1%1:r 1,I rh Ill 11112:111}i'L11%:L'_cs Of � 1bLt.rl -Street t^aclFor Urban a`I.:4t I ::k:. 11 t I I I 'LlL'l_ tL. %Ll 411ced is U; :,:d I fllr11^, f.ti � CHL 1114I1' LOS. Analysis worl-beets t';_rl ts.,.11rd i:i A1)1 c!ui l i. .li' al tel iCan be irl 1;:. 'e uR. Thiw smmienl ofRoutu 1 1 ier rtes ,lr LOS C in rlorthbowiJ and wLw liboil tid dirc'tfil+n 4lLtriml the AM and PJ\1 ^-�a1L bourS_ ..^.tiff}\'ll..' ll'w 1 c''_Ilr'.'+ I,1 Ha'tiw.li: r -iar-L°' an I.A1'`.l."1f1111t'1.1ii. tit'll.wil40{1 .4}1eL'11tT1Tt"'I l`C111:1"t1:1L:Tllr}`."*.T l'"illl.�,..litt'�1t[tl�le level of sL r% foo f:,4 l ally 28: Fulure 2029 Nk ith llroji•ct Sc+ —mciit LOS -lour (wlnr-IH.n�'und (To W1 irnea) Scuthhour"rt. (T -i 1;C`allhr?ll'_ err' L 1 Imphj 1,05 511;;j-fj (7111, 1 1t,S AM Peals I F S C 2?. C PM Peale ;;,.4 c 2C.8 C 5{] Royal Vistas TEAR 5SFA I internatii3nal V. Future (2039) Long -Tera Conditions A. Surrounding Area Conditions 1.(1;iLs 1C1-111 11r11IL0',E'Mel lis i!ICI Udi11« Ilie I.A-t) `street Fxtem;ion. The cs inrileIIon of Alii Iii+;fliway. and the oN Iciclliiigoi Routr; 1 I ii -um lMiry Strcct to KamQli l:r:Qb,l III Ru;icl %,.:ll :mprov< rtzalt0lial tral'iTt :Ll fl%,. area. 1 lie completion dates of these projects are not laiown. Volume,, not hacerl on tni2- e imprw,!cnieut projects. -No tllilLl develti:l it-crt[ ti] 1.11.11t c'l�r-�l -LI(:rion PrOJCM, are exp -tided ill lh: St19ll ulidir,v' rw,l tl' 3t would si-I, Ii::,Llll ;11,. kr 111;' It:..41',t 11 4.111 4'I rlk'� or traffic-volum,:s at the si l l4 :Il [4'.rti i'd's li`'l w, 1 li -, "t l i. ,ed on reselarl.':'. tiff+llllllcilcd {1[1 { li'I++III .l:'. 2.011) ill 1i::State of Ha --,.till O "i'ceo I_ll5'Ir{+Ck119L`r::Jl �tlt,Jll[t' 4.fYll[iiLl (OFIQC) Wttl3tii1e i111d Llle IdL �:1 ;- llio.-1,11 1 I STIP). B. Volumes 1. Future 2039 Without Project Volumes I "i 4' I7='111141 tillAv :'' ca ''.1'll ll:n Iticiui has 1, c:ii w:.xp rIctic:u- ':I1['L:i '-"OV, 111. 111 )OT ADT CIQIJIL>. oJI KZ ILLLL I.I'.':veand Hhi[dala; f",kX1Ll lll<ltl'tsl1,?Iti all% 111C1 :1.tiC .I1 ',';=llicularvolllrn,:s from 201 i io I:j.6. Ho'wev. r. the, :1031' I Wcl,'r l A:d I Iititlway Long Kl ;..ngt I :-<.!nsportwitir f'::II- IoR. 'V, 1,11ly tra_tic in lel+:iii on 14a,ka1, B.,`,;. 76 1,11,1 IL' 111: [L90tl Ve1><ic1•.- in 21''II •i k� I`"'I 0I ,cI:tile .I1 '':)::-;. 'Phis is I1: 'til'II,IIU 2,1lr.l_ I" -LI I In'_ILI;.' _zo.711III 1:: i over 15 wc,Lrs in :hc KOHLr ',rc,L. Since t}Lero ", .! ;t`d'il'.c' 1'.'.I' i't'1'l'li7 ir1't:Tlf rin(l to a4-knd}l4'ledEr..:?I1 of1iI r projec'r� l~ li',1 are 11' I" hwi-,MtT IIM-pe, a vckS''I'.iind !_'rov rh r.:",,' ifl `" pcir `,l`ae Wi. ;Iti JlliLi w ;wcounr fol .'i_li.lrltiilil{ tl';IIr'i` ;II rl.dv iritcrsccuuns. The c -,w ai,l 4l iuru %01.11'1 11.11'1 4 t 111]+.lu[ Llit' 171-tljcct for this. future, y car X039 ark: -,howri in f ilgur'o 15- 2. Project Related Volumes Pharv I rind Ph.i-v .`. X11. b.: :lll:l :'':1.'.' respek:iI 0v. ThQ Irlps xiici-awd arld distribui d by Phase 1 and Phase ? will not change. 3. Future 2039 With Project Volumes Project related trips froin Phase 1 (Yiplre Q) and Phase.- (Figure 12 and figure 13) w re added to tho FUtUre 2033 Without l'ra>.luct volumes (Figure 15) to FLILLlrt; 2039 With Project peak hoi,lr tulwnes #see Figure 16). 51 Royal Vistas TMH 5SFAI in[ernatii3naf — --d Anaty2rd Ptak HUur VOI4 MPS � YInahzed � unsignalized IN rntersecs on � � AIV! (PMI (veh. rj `��/ Intersedion �,_./ Intarsertion P �� Figure 15: Future 2039 Without Project Peak Hour Volumes 52 Royal Vistas TMR SSFN7 in[erna6innf legend } rro1k Hour volumes Analyzed Project Signalized Unsigna'"szed stop Sxen # AN [G.°,•,, [veh/hr} Intersection I)Hveway `n"rsezt!"D' & Intersection Figure 16: Future 2439 With Project Peak Hour Volumes 53 Royal Vistas TEAR 5SFAI internia6imill C. Future 2039 Intersection Traffic Operation Analysis 1. Future 2p39 Without Project Intersection L05 The 211 y,i l� 11116![,. Pru [[Iicrti,ccuon:vl1.: ri;,�Ln;:1:L D )S arld'ISclu-_L' .1:;.1) 11 ,:t,'I'd-, I7:;' v%21110c) %�':tc (IL1cr1111-iwl] I';ir :hc A V, ;mkI I",l I7Ltl.•. hot. y, NOTE: 20.11.1 FtlL[Ireproi,711'�:1tix.11llw I :1111.1.'_; iI"t7ti''.'Ti: r.[te for 2f; ; v, I_iAi is it cojmser%'alit :' a'4': Jill ptioll. TaI?A' ''i ''I'.;1Ws th anki level of Si'1`..L': ::IL°kr lilttL'I 1'1[_ The SIILtLiCkl IOW indiL:.11L'ti III, 1'l'L•I,III i'1':I!-L::II.7J1 L;:1.1',. 1,'1'L!L:1::lt�' Cll.ft uperalc a[ 1.1.1'1 1 {7l i�4511:,e,: ll'L'1 11 !HILI] 1.1 .VL'%)11. : IdIl'O�IAL,7L... -I .' :.I;+ ]'t';l 11. a) Route 11 arse! Polo nt Road_ Overall Intersection 1-05 = CID (AN11/PM) All 'Ir,: nn; r,:Q,:1ious of k(.)w;: I i wi<II P,,; ani kli:lcl in apprc pi-l",c.,: 1.()S D or better c 'mn , %I ,m,: pc,lk I[,kmrN, 6J Route 11 and Henry Street. Overall intersection LOS = C/DC. All movements at the signalized intersections of Route 11 with IEeliry greet resulted in appropriate LOS D or lretwr dUrina: AM and PM leak flours. c) Route 13 and Huclulai Rood (North) Attlee L[llsis-nwIizel-" In°.tit cc'lc�m1 [+1 ROLItC ' I %'%h11 I1ua.akli StL'CC[(lla[tl'11. Wlasthoundleft turning movement has LOS 1- Iti";C' Of :II,L] (:.L11 r 1}:L[ `L°1v I ai.'J 14LJiAjvi dw-WL,, 1-,711; °Vl'l and I'M Nak hours are due to 111L, ]I 1111-oIkv'.h Volum'~ :,11 o..; L: I I . I Ie MatnraIld MIMI—IIImor n1w, L,-licw, operated at acceptable levels of L4,,ik1 t°durwn,tht A\T awl I'XI 11�)[' I -OL.';. d) Route 11 crud Hurrkrlai Road (South) At the un51L,naIized 1 nte rs ect! a Li c1T l' oiIt4 I I v.-ith I lualalai Road (sl'1It11 I. w. ,,; tb- II I tl I -T i.I rn.;l'v _nQvement has LCIS I o,'`c of 0.40 Lind0,8ti t.�l�:ct_,(:I_, ;3 1:4 I r:1u 41° l.'1�, LIU _:t1a I,.;th ANI LWCI I" ,1 1'1— I_c1L',r are drle t,S} eill�ll 111rc�L[s�11 tt',ILLll1:� C?11 :�i7tt'.: 1 ] . 1 :IL" 1:11111' :al':. ,�11i°.' Iilll:.{,: I'. lal', tivllL`[1:�: ,'�I'L'I'�liitJ ,li vL��: �1,1.11?Iw 1c�r.'I:Is I11` 4ert i�:e clL.[rin tilt AN -1 i3rid PNI p :ik 1,01:-V e) Route 11 and Puapaaanui Street. Overall Wtersection LOS= WBC. T,he ccunhl�t nml left LUI'1V One!':4e 1[ T CC'S F ,Il MIL -1 X0111 I1e0k 110LIrs. The ive'sthnund lett turd operates at LOS E durim', (l±: FM peak tLdLIN" :1n: dm rr7 [tae cycle length. The left till -11 vottlaws tits ILrw and ICLI l :'`.'i7 1 ','t!t'_ f) Route 11 and Kuaklni High way Al lily lfrlil�Il:k::z-:d irtcrwtiLAIL 1'. L1[ XUI—ItC l I %kith K.l:.il:1:ii I IILJI V1',y,1I1C 110T1111•t�l;:id Iclt tulni111g. ] a�t11 hay LOS 1 We of 1.031, lind1011_ �LJW, ; LIL:r;n,1. +C V\1 1-I�:r:k hH)Iir iw du% io 1.1".11 "-Ipmgli volume oil. Rclutt I. I!1'. Il�;,l_'4}r and c>'Ikl�r n11:1;1. n,L1,,.1',l4'rll� t�.14•r � �Ii ,kL :w,wll4.L„Iw Ic'v;J., tal�r�.w'.; 4IL;:in� l;lw ,�'L] ,JI;L1 ]'l�1 I+<<.1; IWUrs. gf Route 11 acrd Itoko Stree It. OveruIt Intrersection LDS = EID. :At _ yc i n�ali�cL1 iltLcrsccti..In of Route ] I. w:t:i Lakes Street, various movements opetatc at LC] E vrworse. Thil� &iati k am—ibilLed LO ttIC 1L'31t1L' vf�hm!-- and dw split phasing for the Lako Street approa(.'hes, h) Route 11 and Kamehameho M Road. DveraN Intersection LOS = C'8/BC. All movements nt the signaiizcd inlcr�cclions of Route 11 v ith Kamchatneha 1H Road resulted in appropriate LCIS D or letter during AM and PM peak hours. 54 Royal Vistas TFAR SSFAI inlerno6imill I 1'able 29, Future 2039 VN i I houl Projec I I III ers eel ioll Leve I or Ser -I. ic(. 55 Pole set AM u LIM PAA 10-1-1 f" -C:/ -h)] V I Los Ro L p ti %L Poijin! IRIA PveTall) 233 c 77:7 L L: ; -. P. h 313.8 14,9 0145 0.39 17 B 41. 2C. !j 7.6 Yu D c 1 0.67 D t.1 D 15.6 � 53 El 1 B P % I I F-1. D Tl'` -L -6h x7,7 26.0 2_ n 3y c 30.? 43 47.7 Pai -ni I 'k I 33.9 0.63 D RiputF Ll 1N,nry St (ov,i.=ijl) 33.4 (1.70 C D 34.6 52 C ---- --------- ------- 0.73 I,':: -r-, D 37.5 D Ro u-,, 11 Lq 4-W ej I ii I ei I (.Ijj (D ve I nl11 11 - --------------------- --- I -r? 0 P. 1 1 22. r) 77 El 1'3.8 U, 17 EE L-2`: 1620.7 384,4 11.61 F RL'L'-'L- 11 & ]iUdIdIdi i51 JOVUrAllj 1.5 17 - 12 0,85 F ROLCkS I I K Pi.-.-tp-.m.anJ St (cwomllj c 11.!, :7. -1 NB H." L I K.:t -IS8 L- -D c 10 I L: L, B 41! c C' L) RS -!r 11 KR �L..1 k 111 1 0 .,-11 K. I.; k F 25A 68.2 0.10 L03 0.00 F A 2.9 22.9 0.0 r) c A RO L,F- 11 & 1H kij S! I UVP F&I I 1 591 - E 35.3 P I T, J. -I '1? 71', 19.4 58.4 14.5. 25.6 014 LGI Los 0.90 5 F C 291) 26,4 3S.9 0 37 vao c D 34.C, 0.95 c 11915 1.03 F 77 0.85 E I F, '.1so-Right 50.7 017 0 552 13.17 E L: %2 11, 73.9 EL72 E 71-fr 0.7.1 E i igh 65.3 0.25 E 64.3 0,44 E RaL'- 11 & I•;am 11- Rd (ave. rAll 19-7 - IN 26.1 - c p .I ISI 071 D H a, 7B 0 714 030 D D LA 3.."Es 9 LL... 0,v. B 0.76 r 4�.4 0.87 D L '-'70 D '15 065 D 55 Royal Vistas TEAR 55FA7 interna6imill 2. Future 2D39 With Project Int(trseCtion LO.5 1' I_} ] 4k"1:h I'It411 L:ltl'C'yl'�'.:1}:i d I I L I :1=ttl i`I:l::[1C LBS, and i;1"ti"Ill I.It:l,r, :11'. 4c'ct;Lf41w I'iI wt ll(-`Iw: 115,t'L':. d L:t4I1L1i:15;11 10I 1:1: AM :11:d 1 M I;OL `. <;Ic� 'I r] in TabI r). TI;L: iIK!:AClil,_• 0\ 4',.1:1 111"x:4:4".:4}I} tl�.::,. ftYk4'll :llt5 dint 4'T I -:11L: at LOS � OP14`�+1`t•: :..L' h 1.11_'-Il:cl 1I �clls�u. �11k: lr: LL,L.' � in .gip pvndix 1. a) Route 11 and Pafarrr Road. Overall Intersection LOS = CIC JAM/PM) AF 111 L `:'1I:}11 t�- 1:5'1'--.' I ' 141711 t''I«'Mil Road resulted in appropriate LCIS D o[ 1Yktrtii 11%1 and I'll 11,:1: h1111, b) Route 11 and Henry Street. Overall Intersection LOS - CIO. A I •11o%:Ir I Iti 'Wil, h7cc :11"t"Accijons of Rom,: I ' 11 ir11 I IcnryStreetresulted in appropriate: LOS D OF bC[[C.r (Lirillg1 ANI LH1E P I+C-:k I:tYLIr�_ c) Route 11 and t- ualcalai Woad (North)' 111 `I ti ' %l PUA huur, tilt UFS!I..I ;1:LI Jniersc.'11,111 w Jlo,IIL` I I wVilh Hualalai dill-Ltil 11=11rEf';. os cl-:111 1'1- j i!1. 'II Illlw 111tCrS G1 LL?ll lS �'} :•'vt:lll'tl4 1] r lt]I :li'- .L 4 1::!li. LI1Cl-ePj`t tl-0171 tl]C �11 ''•11"i15"l:r I''It}1:'r'I -.01'I.IL7.1011, lhC I;t tl]4La'1+:'. _t`11 [1..:'L'.II:!' 1.1t+',4C71Ci1T lltlti 1-c 1 I 115'10 of4- Y1 -anJ °].79, tILl1-]ll_ 115,111. M and PM 1,,,�ak I':rur� Lluk: TO I:-L_'h r11rt1L1;'1 �sl.'llu.:, a.I;L ki:u[c 11. Thu tnL q ::Ir,v o-IL.:i :ml.01 .L14+Lr111:nt�. OPeraled :'.° :l cc :I)lti l:.til, (If 14`I l ICI ::[Irlllt? 111i :•1M ,a1,- LP."If 1)va, I!M:!', d) ,Route 11 randHuatalai Road (South] Al 1'152 IIII I_Fil<;l'YLd `llter.;e'CiLk%r'.Yt'RontL: I I with HLIL11:l.Y1i Rilt1:: ;wL`41tI11, t� ,11';)111-11 ICA I,II-ll':lir',VLS1:t'_111e1nt hsl. I 0S, F I, -c of I 61 Iir,d I I I .'4 iL'S`t'; c"I'. ! ,Ird III 1!, LI rs u l L ,tl•I '1'41 ill"LI 1''t,`I 1L -r I 1 , 5 1 � a� C 'l'�Yl, 1 <' t{ tir� are due tl; "11!°11 throul 211 Vol ,II'1' 11 s1.'7t1 1 1 '1 'li I'1`'.jl l :f l` . }t11ti` I lll;ti31'i130V1 ?114,1;4 5:51}L I:1 r4r-1 .IT;i:ctiptablelevels +1 *ti:'. t C dLLIJIII-�, tIx' :111 :L1;1 PM 1}tt11. I:L)urs. e) Route 11 and Puapuraanui Street. Overail Intersection LOS= BC/BC. The ciNi1--um)tl kc� :txi 1 0,-� F (v c -&0-79) Llttr'ing the PM pcak hour, The delay is a result of sill: I Li I 11-1 -! :Llld 111e __*r.11 IM -11111' 0:+ Allo 17L Lid 11�ted to redLLCe approach delay- All other mmernent� at the si tlLll , 4l nitir,�c1L:�1r:s L11' Rout,a 1 I u it::j 1'Lwpua nui Sired resented in appropriate WS D or better during Al rIr_c 11.%I p ak �;Ou�n_ P Route 11 crud Royal Vistas Roadway Ai '.I:L' 1:1:1 1+,. :cl I..:I I_r:I:.l',<I:d 111tC1`S02tlu11 Of RO..1: 1 I :1I:C. 111: Jr.il :3.1 `',': 1.1- Jt:l;lti'-',;Ik'- Ilk: til n _1'S,k:1:1L'[11 1 :,CI' Ra11.11v S I iniii RLI 11 Vl-�tUL ' 'ti`s kl`.:14 5t, i. ,•II .-I1.Y-14 'Ll L , ti4:`. i 1:11:1':11;1 : l` il's, <:.11 ; of I 1 5, 1 ? ;alli:ti s.:',Il 11:1 1)Cll.11 1J4?Il ilC}'=lrti, I hw '•'S' '`•.1'.t, l.`14: "F1 I.I1lll:ls; 1'1;'': 11'e']ll l'.:i> I 0S t 14 1.11 '•.1.X and D. -I I?t?th AM, I'ti) 5.'4:11;`-b w } ,I11d .'N'1 1 1 } 'S ;':ill: r:"}' PL, Ik ll<.)1.1f� i..L1,' tC7 l ILa r:1ftl,14l1 VOILI111C4 ')I1 ]tr ulw 1. 1. 1'1:_1-.1: 2 lell ti? WIC I.,1t,C LI`4wl til LICC:4 l`<'.!llfti 1 1 11:: II11L"I'S;;t:[ItYIL ILS1lil.LLS1'1� Sit::l`1l[li:'1;.�. 'S41Ll :.II :L'.'til'�1_rw :11 �'."* %t:t�i111� ti'r1 tL'::i'�- 1`.til""-'t111w1: IL1 t`.'I: } %I lie;A 15-L1:' ;1I`;: _ 1 (Yl t c 111 )Tl Irl I:IL '11 rc;i., 1,-111. I is mil of ,'.11,I of li" 11'.ror n1r,�'cL1;LI .>oj)1:iAlQiti al;4•',4'1-.01'+wl'': 4: JL1 II"'L� Ih;• :1111 lr1,l PV Ivakhollrs. g) Route 11 and Kookirli High way, At the un, I 11.4::z:4l tion ofRoute IIwl,1114:1,„}.I:ii IJIL_IICit northbound le'!ILIr11:1L'y:1:O`Vement III -Li, LOS T' : 5+1 I _fl`+I du3ir1 i tfic A\J 1}::.1 Iio-1= :'ti1. 1171)L`I III'."iL`Irl,!JltS I}Ii 1'::.. 1 :1' Liti 11:a1 14'1:.,, of L! 1- c71 5 ,Iu61.,r ['IL: 111.1 and l'M 1)eak hoLm, _ 56 Royal Vistas TFAR I ii ble M: Fu I u re 2039 With P rojed I ni erseel imi Level of Svr% i ce SSFAI inlerna6imill 57 Dp::.:tv(p c/v P. h'l A'A Ded �v fsar)vph PM Vic LOS Rout_ I'l Mal a n i Rd ovu rij: 11 P: -11_ I �r, 1'h").J.: 23.3C 1 140 R ZE.' - - 0.75 0-71 C D C OM D it. I -Al 1, ti 9 0.56 8 17.7 0.52 B r.. p 6 GT� 7 Cs.0 n.75 D P:� C. -;el 26-19 a25 C ;43 74 C D i 7 5 0.51 -1 v 1.!, 1, 0.65 C D RoYte.-III& H.,e,.nrV ;overol 1 R;.,jt,:- I' --r-. 072 061 C SS. 1.15 0.72 0 D 0.17 r� Sl D krsule I_ L', R,-Ljjj' X7'1 *,43 L I L F) R 1 7, 1), i- 3t,5 D D R I: -Pj gl' ?7.7 0-36 C 0.711 C 14f AR 17 0. 17 4 1 57 D D .................... . . ..... . ....... 5 0519 1 H+,r-.,-i Nr, Rl hl ]qx,y �,::T - --, .-.-: l(OL:'ll i'luk 37-4 q57 0.03 0� 14 1571 C I 40.1 347 C-03 �. m r. 71 C L) C Route 11 & Hu aiatl ai (N u -.%., rail I R,- dL I' N tiI L lluai�;al Le-. 36,3 D. - - 6 2.4 41 0-2C 2163.6 430 F 5531 0.79 p Route 11 & Huzia I ai fS) avc fa 11) ILI 1:1. .1 L,- i S& LC! I L 0 15.± 0-19 8 '-3.4 0-13 9 404.0 0,51 F 679.5 Idl F RDut 1'- K 0 u nptj on n ub Sl overall 3LIL 173 0.40 C 0 330 47.2 0.75 C 0 193 01,96 7 -.9-1D. 8 1 ;1 k::. I I I -.P. .. 24.5 0.28 C '-7.7 ;,4'1 a k7,".11 V I" Il 7: 218 0.81, C 41.0 0.99 Ci 54,5 1775 640 0178 E -:-,. 1, .:k.gl: 317 13.0 C 3a0 0-09 D ,• -Li ---- f L 71 1 'ti34� 27.7 a 37 41-4 it D I}L9 4 3 9. 0 rang n Route. It 7ay I Vi&ea-mlOvCrill 49 - 3-1 H:-:Jk, 1, �15 .,?lt L1.2 ;1.0''• b 3.3 LU? a ',V3 Llft 242.4 :3.81 R 405.8 0.73 k�-).:� 13,3 .3 .11.4 35 n Route 11 & KuAkini H L 1 .2 2,9 kc,b:� J' N,.- 77.5 1.06 F 23.4 6.65 C . . G p 300 A 0.0 ................. Roule 11 Ld ko St (ovu Fa; 1) k,.lt--- I Nii !.cfl 65.4 - E 4T.3 D 21.5 0.16 C 31.6 C 29 C 1 N "; - -) "':: ¢,'b.5 1 05 F 45.1 'v.97 17 1 -EB 07 28.6 1.11 0,08 F C 77.4 0-9c. E 37,8 11,95 122-7 1.04 F 81-5 ;f-85 LlG L 73.0 0.76 E 726 x.73 E 0133 E 6i.11 D-41 F Route l_ 8. Aam III Rd overall ZENG H: it. 1 11 F. .11�- 1 qh 2 s P.7 D C k' .w- i --.L .3 L SL.7 51 D F. 31:-1-r);i.-,h b . . .......... . . . . . . . . .................. . ..... F F) I•-n.--7-irokiph-R D ae,6 D 57 Royal vistas T1AH 55F147 internatii3naf h) Route 12 and Lako .Street. overall Intersection Los = EID. At the signalized intersection of Route 11 w it`1 L_ako Stivez. various r11oA-crllents opi rnittc at LOS L or worse. This delay is attributed to the traffic volumes and dw split phasing lot• ilu. 1__.akt•1 'mi-ccl apprflachc;, i•) Route 11 and Ka ehami ho III Road. Dvproll infersectlon L05 = CIC. U wo%cwl!nt� at the of ROUCC 11 with Kanlch-Linicha 111 Road lc5iilrcd in LOS 1) uT bct;ol ,lL,'; I lt'_ AM :3,nd PM peak Iwux rs. 3. Future 2039 With Project Mitigation Long tens 1nc;lu4111W the La kt) St] -C;:1 [:.st llsi rrl..I:I:} completion of A11 Ifi�21 veu. , xnt'L elle 1►'ideniilg elf °':},n� I 1:om Henry io Kwnehamehta Ill ROatl %w,11I -Irliprove re�_'0la 11 1'1v ,=uriti arr r. The COilllllti;:4rr1 11:1(es ofthes 11'+II,: is are not known. It, 1hV 111U:111'. 111.11'IL::IIr11'� 1141: a) Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Simi liir to tilt -,, i -Itj Lq, condimol.. I I: I'1 Lau[ �;irtiL71 upproach Iot1 iunti, operate at LUQ 1 41.1::1L +;I;I. I ::Ik hot. ; ill loth l-1u;:Wai Road I :; :tlr.5 1s a -](l tlhe Rlnatl `~< im as d.-ry -)% ay. Peak -Hour �-ol.luLL- 1::allI ;I<_ri:al iii'= 11'rd 14':t l{51. l't{]l;.t:t con{lit on- . Table 3l shows the Pe,*- I• Ir yS 151:;"11i Clri;l,4:1; '11 'ii `I l� I;I' ::'1ii lw H-LHi 11'4' ;]r.ri•.' 1, I a h I e 31: Future 2039 Pea kt -Boar Warrant' ,1 2. JV:thout Peak 1.In Jr Warrant M P IV] tlilai c'r Minor %Vd" ranE? Ma i]I h4•'i'rlv _.i 4i •. - I'll . 21139 44 ''a r_} 1:'J I-.,.rl•a .11 r:_1 i:)6 9 V:'I r; 14 It; '1 JP79 Wiih Project I :Al , i I, I,1 Peal, d•„irrsrrt AM PM M ar Minor Warrant? Major M'ilior Warranl?' a13 44 NO 2792 in NO I ..gild ,i ks 2121 9 NO 2320 14 NO ko at Viiras Dwy 211; 29 NO 2489 12 NO K_ikinl !-�wy 2721 a NU 2766 u NU Norte of the ull,i:. nal r. -d i?lt4nwk: ions will satisfy the 1'vak Hour Warrant. Each •ach of tho unsignalized intersections ell,,:,:tt: '.. °til relative elv lour overall delay. The minor street left volumes at I ltlalalai Road and Puapuaanui Strc,:- ..1 �� I4 attivciy low and the observed delays are generally inuch lowor than the calculated del ays. 'l•1 -W 2001. Il I [-•I) ,.I,It, ' : I :-F. IWQT�k::II TI %V1 Ill ht"ll VU!A111W of 141.1-[til"ll IT -:11 i.; Ir(31n 111 ` :1•.:1:or tilt 'a:t fl;i. '•441:I'll'T :.:IJ.':51, I'l:aw' Lie perf47mwd in ai C11.91 nerthat considers the hiL-,iwr of T:1': ll',Uk)1'- turn 1 I I..tl`I s 1* ':11•- '.111'liil'-MI,:Ct' vc~,liulic and the cornnpondu1L), sinl,Yle dlrectll-ll of oppo( i:I1_''111:n' 1:111 1,:1� mzjor sttc:cl as lht 'n'.:lit"'-•t ct" vuh.wic'_ Thi Rehr[{ I I unr i Ktlakini I14:l ', i.. -1,,r..fl i.md Icl: :I.rrl operates at LOS E dur n•;. i It '%M Neale hour. For th * analysis. the norCillound J1 rear l '...,Ir -ml reprr*e 11., the 1riinor approach volol--_ :w1 , td`s' so1uthbL)Ut341 V01U1114 repr1 , ri, rl'4 ir: or •a171'rl: li vt kirl, (see Tabic 32), Single Peak Hour warrant Lv,14 ['V ill :S:['. rt ;}F', CaaISt SLlfflcien# iji>t,l wo Li avaikiblt wind in i ail` ,11- '1'lir::'i•-: r1 [ ' whether or not an intersectiw, _ inuld lir cca!tilr3err!d ,vid niw torrid for a Lri�ffic sigr-e_I. 5 �, Royal vistas TIAH Table 32- Future 2039 Peak -Hour "'arrant' SSFAI interna6imill The Rou le 11 :i 1J K Li x %- L r i i III i y i nterst:c r i Lm w i: I satisfy the I'cI i i VV; i i r. i i I i --i,, ,atisiaction of a. - I ii lrcwarram, %N a,, mialyl.ed a,, wier-it!c6ork val I ouF IL:1:-i.m, Id for III,: F.amc 21114 With Projeet CWl,fi!.Ion ksL� Tabl%: 'Ilfl, Table33- Future 2@39WNh Prejecl— Route 11 211d KLMM11i 1110-11INVAI Left -141111 Sit -11,11 PIUSilig Alternatives 2 -Lara e Hqutv ]1, Prute dud Lett Turn signal Phasingon Ku2kFnl IlIghway Delay (seUveh) AM VA l'rdx. -1 Du f Warf 2 rit pm 2029%tlhout VA I,.D5 Route 1I&Nuakini Hwy�ovcralll SO.1 ,x, i v, P t .):J-.., I I N D Thro.l_nry 2,1 - ----- ---------- Z- Lim v ROLM' Pe rrm ssi ve Lett Ti rn �'ipm'[ Flnivmk nn " u2:,oni Highway Oulay JseL,?vuh), !U 0.65 0 T, AM D F A A LOS 260 C AM F 2 L (1.6a Pry -1i2k3y I I) v/C -, V Rrjul11 & Kua-Jni I wv �rlvvrefll1 Project A 1.55.6 1 mii�uv:] Nli nor � VVirrarlU M.ijur V-1:iUr 'N �Wa ri L. klak i n 1 Hwy 1029 1 602 YLS 1 �719 -0 YES A K L l,!i il - LJ I.: a.0 Peak Hou, nt 00 0. CIO A Route IL, I1mt+F1zr-,qLLrt [urn Sipnal P-mimp. nn Highway AM v/c LOS pry I'vla-cr I K:'ir,,r Warrant? Major i -Ir- Warra t? J a `II -.vv bO2 YLS 1270 ---,LL0 YES The Rou le 11 :i 1J K Li x %- L r i i III i y i nterst:c r i Lm w i: I satisfy the I'cI i i VV; i i r. i i I i --i,, ,atisiaction of a. - I ii lrcwarram, %N a,, mialyl.ed a,, wier-it!c6ork val I ouF IL:1:-i.m, Id for III,: F.amc 21114 With Projeet CWl,fi!.Ion ksL� Tabl%: 'Ilfl, Table33- Future 2@39WNh Prejecl— Route 11 211d KLMM11i 1110-11INVAI Left -141111 Sit -11,11 PIUSilig Alternatives 2 -Lara e Hqutv ]1, Prute dud Lett Turn signal Phasingon Ku2kFnl IlIghway Delay (seUveh) AM VA ;as pm VA I,.D5 Route 1I&Nuakini Hwy�ovcralll SO.1 ,x, i v, P t .):J-.., I I N D Thro.l_nry 2,1 - ----- ---------- Z- Lim v ROLM' Pe rrm ssi ve Lett Ti rn �'ipm'[ Flnivmk nn " u2:,oni Highway Oulay JseL,?vuh), !U 0.65 0 T, AM D F A A LOS 260 C R7..G 0.94 F 2 L (1.6a Pry -1i2k3y I I) v/C A r ---- LOS Rrjul11 & Kua-Jni I wv �rlvvrefll1 :16,2 A 1.55.6 1 112o 06. 2.1 A R vo! f, I I SE 2.0 11 A 28 0,72 A K L l,!i il - LJ I.: a.0 L: LYLI 00 0. CIO A Route IL, I1mt+F1zr-,qLLrt [urn Sipnal P-mimp. nn Highway AM v/c LOS pry ou�dy 1%uLivuH vic LOS RDLtf' it 91 FUliAini HwV�mevztllb 42.7 1 D 7] A i4)ii:r: 1:1 hil est 98.3 Lm Route 11-N H Through :'i Du LL- I 1 1, 1,, TI i r rjugh 7.1 51.8 4.65 1.00 A il I Kuekjl)i H%hwiv F B apparva; h 00 000 A "I I: clv��. .:�C � I -I %% -Re I1IICT',CC,I01,1 %% 1. i 1 Ill onerntat LOS F tbi- rill It lrl tives irl the A M ea k Ii, i I I I r i.ti tc'n:, 11'411)d 1. T I - ir . i 1.L I i-., t L, installed ar this intersection. "Single Peak Hour warrant Wdb (".1i I I a . L'(Ni bf'Ca L ISe 5U fici ent d;t ni w ii Li a v a i I ii b I e 41 rtd to give ;i n i n c; 5t i, I n a whether or not an intersectiw, _:I if, t, Id lvcaj-ti idot od ,-vid niw , Ltm ed for a Lri�ffic signal. 59 Royal Vistas TZAR b) Alternative Mitigaboa Mpcstires SSFAI inferna6imill I 7 A I te ru 17 1'% L,,, LAA o S � ro c' I",1111 -C'11 t[IC' Of Route I I m I 'I- 1'y2{'(1 for the Fmm,� '41.1-1. 1 ;'xi :,r [ j Sir, -et, showit , r I Lments wil' mpg ri ik- %vi i 1: m accept,,:ib,., IS 1.:I1j-t�, I cA.LLrn on L.-, t s k;, ori -,-L l" K'�Uh' 11 A�:'I) on ti i ; I a ti11II L= 1., 11 k,., L'i L I I-1, 111 rhe ovenill Lkda�'. 17.11 1'.L Hilt 13, I'litill.i. 11131) %Vith 1'rip,ic-et - Routc, I I iind Laka Street Left -Turd Signal Phasing All1cl-WIGN 0, Z-Lwip Roukc,. 11, I1mtprtv.d Lof- TUT11 5 igrA IN as:rtr GH L,3Au S.rLel Ue[ayjsL4v h) AM LOS D,-I@Y I Svc/vch� 771 j'[ LOS Rou kF 1j, k La k p.5 t jpvt� r A I 11 37.4 0 I- , 1&9 024 1 b 25.9 0.25 c 1. AT:Ifo, gh 58.7 1.02 F 30.7 S&3 0.91 0,89 c 6 I .!,(Jgh 2$-() 0-81 c 37.8 0.94 c La. L3 R hi I.Aiu)'NS ker. 112.0 51.5 L01 0.19 O.7? F D t 79.3 56.3 70.8 1 0.86 0.19 0.73 E E L a54 c 70.3 0.60 c Z -Lane Rr;Ljta 11. Permv.tvv Left Tumftnal Phasiqgon Lako Sive km Delaylsecjvch) AM WE LOS 'Delay [wc/veh] pm VII: LOS Route 11 & tako St (overalij 54.5 D W - c VCJL, " 11 ".1' 2-5.3 4.56 c 24.8 Cr 21 c R0 W(' I C), 0.3 1,05 F 217 487 c 1475 I'll F 3S 5 a -PA 1) 27.6 Q --p4 c 26.6 0.91 c 1,i.2 C; 711 D 59.1 0,67 L 0 49.0 0 11 r) D S2.D 0 2 9 D "', II 1r. Z. Lar -.1 HGutL, 12, 11rat+11cr177 LLft -1 r7p.l:,:y{,erjveh ANI VIC 1 11 L Ds 4K.4 DeIaV [s,ec/veh 0 B Pm vJc D LOS RIDLIN' 11& Laka St joveraill 43.5 28L4 - c :gi r, U D? I ;;lD 22.8 2.1.11 4.19 08,5 c c U99 C 32.9 0.76 c I I 1- R 14.3 101.9 0.77 CL99 B F 23.5 76.9 nA9 0 B0 c E 52.4 0-25 11 61,7 0-26 F 4 tane Foute ii sp: i!. 111h,asing an qtrept 55.6 64.4 IDPI...y [u-1..NFfl , 0.42 0.51 AM w,/[: F E 61,{) 71.7' 039 0.61 pm Vh: E Los ROLRE 118x. Ljko St love 1,111) 23.8 f 17.5 a I . ',I I w: J "J" F. 11).7 fA Q111 0 8 D '2. R 0.75 c P t 1 2=.•3 c i" c Z5.9 0.14 c n 0.66 0 UA a-60 c i Right 314 0.29 c 317.4 0L34 c m Royal Vistas TZAR SSFAI internatianaf I i .to, i'in; �f ^1ri f'1.'r+,fle _ i t +7+ 'ril:i'. '1 7 1 I—C k)l11Tn+'1lIt .117 1-cl:.. 11C Il1N:.10 I'0I 11, 1;: :-.lr, .L:a,- .r1-1•.1 i1 171,01cklcs' l,-ll-1.11'1pI1.°4- rl',7111' hi t•f -i:lir}ii. -Lni l PfflIli ;sit L- A. -O- I L I 1 .11 .L-11-ILI1'n ,�F:1. 1w 1';11 "'li- :.-'k. ;1 h e1" , ,; �' I t. 1cI :I:.I,r• w`h kf0i-C allowiliv 11olt1is"IvLc left -Fath PIiasing. the widC1111 01 h. 'Ur:' 111` i.1,,:d I 11 4. Future 2439 With Project Segment LOS Art,:rl_.1 L(] IY.L tiLri,i ,. c1 rr S•. I:CI1:,) 1!1' 1?,Mk i'. I: 11_IaltLl-i I eI,UII I tL - .. 4, 4' -rpt:. '•h'I'�`rr ;1 :1.:1:.4,! 1114'; ti�ti:'t�l']� :IIt tip:, IIl'.11: _�.�.! 111 I1,Ylrl. II1� :'illll� �I1S'.l. f! Ilt �.iLntilll�"'�! I1�.S11 ILI-h:'.I1 ^.111ti: ;L'1ti�;L'l.l.�,•'tit: �k'ILI: :witi.UNthe 111t 1110k-.1 llk• , t;+,1'"Ll-i n :i el h.a it eti. II1nrL1J'-9,,fII I, -If tr.°:��I wJ,ee l Used to anal ti 2. 5rehit:t-:ai D 1,1:4 -1 Call h -,u li uu4! .11 .1;.lJli llklir 1. l l w uL;w. Ld l.tl� C:1:1 I,t: found 1n T;v,'L 35. kIbIV .1�1: I-liIL11T 2039) with Projrc't Segment T.O This grwnt of Route I l OPCI-'IIL-.i :'. - -) :11 II:: r1i+11:11ki.Lrld 1I11:LTIL1n 21nd LOS B to tIIC SULItl bound direction in the AM peak hour. L)L_riry� 11-.: 1"N1 1' k 110L:', 1--:)r11 Llil.'r ?8L111 operate at LOS f The arterial LOS for the AM and PM peak hours satisfies th, County of 1FI,r;, rii Chapter 25 (Zoning), Article 2 (Administration and Enforecnwtttl. Division 4 (.h L lit' hints), Section 46 (Concurr, tncy Requires lents) regarding "acceptable Jbi- trart�:pomtlon 1-kilities, 61 N oil I---,urj11.1 (Tr,'-,Viil;E�a) Southbounc; (To lCo nihnij) Peak �ic:lilr Spud ,ri h) LCIS 5pe,ed (rnph) L0 APS Peak lb , L 12.'7 L PM Peak 19.1 C 19.7 C This grwnt of Route I l OPCI-'IIL-.i :'. - -) :11 II:: r1i+11:11ki.Lrld 1I11:LTIL1n 21nd LOS B to tIIC SULItl bound direction in the AM peak hour. L)L_riry� 11-.: 1"N1 1' k 110L:', 1--:)r11 Llil.'r ?8L111 operate at LOS f The arterial LOS for the AM and PM peak hours satisfies th, County of 1FI,r;, rii Chapter 25 (Zoning), Article 2 (Administration and Enforecnwtttl. Division 4 (.h L lit' hints), Section 46 (Concurr, tncy Requires lents) regarding "acceptable Jbi- trart�:pomtlon 1-kilities, 61 Royal Vistas TEAR 55FA7 internaiii3nal V1. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS K L I I I - J 1'h�ccl-1 Ciqilannilrg� I � 1 L i L' ILII" � J 'I I. I' � I -I I I I I C 111- :I I. I I I L I k 1� I � -71 1 ):1111 1 1 1 V IsI T1 K i oil rliz-, K;iiLi-m,;Lim 111 ;11 WK 0) 7-6-0'.10)16. 17 bc--,%L•cn 1\urla \ .,jra Subdiv',:iiiil ir.d Pt ----hr' 1:1 t,' '-,lihdi,,,con. C).le ackc,4c k pliwicdl to to 11. lipproxin'.did', 6110 tk:ei iioj-t�i o:'ihe intersccuoi) %Affll K;o.".1ti1 aecec` ,61.11 bte bLL111 htk)-e -li.-- i=-,w1,cc-t1-i-_;., Ro.,­C Lo Various foadwaypr�jL,::w thl�-I%vj_l to * The lc',ening of Route I I from He nry Str,,-e, To Klrrwllafllo I I[ [I I Rcod.. * Thc int' Alii HikhkiIn I)virl I]Lrala-lai Mta-d 10 KCall]1011 * 'The Lako Street J'. * Future 'minor cc) n -mir.o pi I , I I IA to kcvl 1 1 r Iro, I I I :c Ill :x tclfirl'-I I I oortla-P a SiTekn tu [.L=11:111: SiT-c.1 11'"1(1 :`,I ll I I J� I rc.­. w. K Ck. I:, -I. It ': I I I o,!. B&1 ed ctrl the existing traflic %01L11T1e_q 111d 111111re rroiecdnv�; ol'R.nval Vi4(3`,0111 (N�. SI-Irrounding, roadways, Ill L! Xt I I ic 1 1 :i rld I .-LCIk } S : vo. l0n M III IC Mdi4LduLil li licT, ]17,21iz I :CL11 I On", :l Te L%J�cCtz?tl ii, deterwi-Lne ro 1. 1.1 L I '11f 'xAlel1:1Ig i,l'f�oute I I lo 1-I,_'1. „ind 7fie i of %.hi ro Ilio no --qioiial c:ili;iJr_ Ir rl-L ;iii'vi irr. t)l" It, 111'.,` C ..`I1 I : I j t I!',! 1:6' con.sidor-.- oi, 71 %Li.; t_ omil� 'Lind I II)OT. F_1111,' I I ir'd k("a" )l', 1111,T'._'CrIoll W: I 01 -1,'1 -;ITP at an acceptable LOS. are iIo- ai Ili,, lime. 1..,)[11, I I I] -d I 1',rIv,:1 T_\lwtn._-. ._'1,I WdlcmL this inteTsatlon will operate at an acceptable LOS- Im"Drovo-l"Ill's -j nrc 171.54 recon-nnended a( this time, R4)w-1• 11 ard I Allikl'X Road k.Nonh� 1`1,1% 1111clsC''l1or. ilocs Ilw pa.'s lkx Foul. -Haul' wat-rantnrre�ik roF anv- cordition- The 1f1 the LPI _A!1_0 11-2 vil EInt_, .,' 7 '•L-11( ; 10 1 1,1x11 Ill :.1c: A -I-0 P.V [1, iuj I .-]I 111%,' ',J'L'I'j LT ?d h I Ii, 111 111:x, Ic % U I - I.W k_­:>�[ I )0k I I ' J L'l 11'C ! I],,: I Ill firid r, -[j7,:.1, I IL' imic -o.mikibi5w. Ill itilipro% L'IILT1110111 fl1l" IIIILTIL_,'170'1 01. 1'1,' i_'(TJI'-orl I)ijl \Noyfiejj W, ;1;-'tey 1024 11711]1,':=13c5111 -'L, Iil11 li- kill-, rielldo-1: :11 1'11ti 4. Routo I I Mld I 1LIAI-', .1 kl)Id As the ivc--,thoutikl 1c`2t wi..i de,i\ worse. dvj\,n-ti :Kld1 11) 1 ,C PlI,1j',I.:.',JPLJI Rover, I I in Tlh' 11 '1111L"Lllld Lfi:vL:iion_ This inter,Lo ior Jit.. rwi r'i.-: I'tair-I loir %\ -Lirrant OT the pcnk-f I oi I r 11ami rJ 11"L)t I I- L' L' X I I I M! OT filtUrC 0011 111 I 011o- I ;. 1.1 .' 11 L'I_ :`:'}'.111_' 1V I 1'1�iL' 01VI :- :10r.,, it is re c. o ni r i: - i k': k, d an acce I e t-. - I o') lie be installed for the W Q'V 1-10 11 --1 7':--.111 1. 1 1T 0114 K') � I re 11. A *_I . 1 .1 A) �meroundabov-- ,vil ;I- C operations at tho., fD1 7 'k�' ,'" 7 O'll:' butwovi L11 to LOS F 'C:14, A roaF)L1_'."0L1' is notrec,l r-n,`nd_,d - hk 5. Route I I r:1rd Pua r, 1, -1: 1111 - I � I,%- : e I: Sl,-rnal ti,v it kk: rlkv'I: li-In:d ;-IJ akdi,.istti:d :ii i%:e(:;%d to incrc,iik: Ilii' 11, u_v'm 1: i� ilil:;i CIL't, UOS o: I R-11le I I a'_l ,-Icaj III(: I I )I k! I --cl 1'! 11 ill I cycle. W, Royal vistas T1AH 55FA71nterna6imal 1. RoILtV, I I and R :LI V •`..I, It(;r}LI v"'IY I IIIc Ill'tlj-seC'Io71 11.11 ::1-:I,:tIo11 2L4`Qty? 11,''"`.' :111'111:, l "Ila ILLI' HI:1w I b111101.,1it. Beti,l-e :1111' PIi:i,� 3 Ic ILIk'ii1'c'� :11"k krt''111i144I Ir 1w vk,%, 1'1 mk•11d,x. 11v: '. .t' 4 1171'.s';'Sr +I1 1k) Ks,' ,J.,'i11;1kj'a i'lace lib completed ,;o tlnil Ro,)iil .k`tl ow, ",IL1 :ktl` r:, CII, I.,iku mtcot trairic signal, 7. Rtmtt� I I ;:uxi KLM1,1171 I `lid lT',: '.' L'C`llilil I1.1..,L'., 1-'., PLL' :� I it M1' 14::1x`1:7111 1111'Irl:,' :III pl:-kh fiollrti for mll CoTld1119,1R1t. t.1. )-':I 1.1":l "1':1x11,` I! I".1, do_- 110 I11::illl :l IIs' 191<'.:11,Cd1 I1--cr or, ,rllL:I- ihal SLL-11'A Ill` ;ILIu1'S /1:J '.1 AC:1 II1rt:l, ['11%, L4 tL :1]1L'. 111E 1:1_[vi l (7f o':C l: :II I:L 4v LrafC..t ArI:IF,.'4I-�:itIbis ItvLt,2cl: kill `.'lll"i:1r:41LI.,Pku.w]I?L? o'•,cr;Itlk1clovattile "III r,2:'tL".1l"'r3 d °.n lcasc,vk'hila -.Ilk'rLlr'Illt(}'Jrd Iz:I!'1 lurnwIll x-01 Forworse.A ll:i;llt signal �A.:)ki:.d not beJ� in -stalled int thiscon. Ro-, al Vitas traffic has vcry livfi of pct on this A m1Lgle-lut io j(11LI)41�:.:'4•ut t, LI.,r, aLe at LOS F for t1 -k= AM peak hour :v17.LI17.1011, and LOS 1= for all til':r,' :-)nki,lll)ns. A round6out is not recommended at this 8. Roti l k I I mid Ldl- , Street Tklk` l i,tko Sir%: L iutor,krtnou aper:'.::•. .II I 0S F 1) t 11` I 141111 0" 4.'1111:,.11 C% 1 .1 [LI Vistas tllc` 0',1) coridil'lott, L:``I:w1Cr than k` wci.:I r tlt l o,1l I 1 I.:ik Feet :x1'1314: Ilk.. c 11.11tging tl7t' 1, 1. ," 1;_ ":,'1' ,pht i4.4t1_ c lt'1p ower the (fi:LI_...IJrltr,u L, h I _t Will still oper<!,,, :it LOS L .t Nvorsc. This lnicrsccuoii �v uld *tis I:l'_11DI% 1211! 1U:11:[1', iL1-II I'mire norrh-soul L rL` ]Mail c 111:r�:i ';' 1-,v, i1. cd h4' L1'w li.`I'ylction A ll'1.1L'1"1'.•7 41t P.MIiw 1 1 II"t`'1'. 1 crrw Street to K;iri Aixiii'I1:. Il Ri,:1k1 -Lincl lilt Con,,,iru,tu 3n WWII II 12.)tn4 I I mid 1Ci: ehti in ehi III RoA ._:1c1 lilu.­_ i.1 Lit I+ i mdjf ,itc this iniersectlon will operate at an acceptable LOS. huprovL:lmit� to 6DN Lllici-scclion arr4 not I:6 k`o1111nctlt• od w this, trI• of ,"eri:ll i t7S `Arco rjrlrl�ti r4tl it Sti-I1.JIT41 Or ;ynr4 1 1•I'C1111 I ltlalli1:6 i;ic11rh) to 1,.,x'o S[rec'1. Whk rk! �i,Fn:lli�td interscc sf34 aL'i :c'w, tliati 2.P 1:'11 11.1.111. 1110 taCility Sh011.1(1 be Ci!I It -ICC till LLI'1711II ktrctt :!iI(1 ailalyzell with tilt MCthol_ii110,'ik -1 +1- [:rh:':n ',[r.2,1 IILicJVIc-,. For L tkm Strccl F.tclhll s, tllrk)Ll;�11-Vclu k: tr:l�'�I s1 ccd rs U.Sed tO UI1ZI1VZl2 VV211'i'I.I:'1 1 t l I Illti s :!lll.'lt i'` Route' I 1 Jt I OL, D o. 1%et- r for L'.11'll .-oil litioll 41 the AM alld PM v",l1. II 1,1r I he l WCOLlnt� k 'rail 'ajt 1/1,11m 1. e''JIicli (.' C1:lil:il te; :1,7:1 .Ir141 lll, x4411: 1111. 1)]1 ],1171, 4{; 1i14:1iII1L.1tth�, Scci.lo'3 46 (Ccn1:LlmmLE ,, Rk:'_11LLrCmC11,t41 regarding "� ceptiibje level cal Berl ice" joy trLLtr1,,,p0rtati.cin JaciiitieS. 63 Royal vistas T1AH 5SFAI internatti3nal VII. REFERENCES AmLrir n Assoc -- :aiwl Safi ;1,4r4 I lig=.hway anti Transportation Officials. A Pohe.° on Geometric Design of fliKti.S',cc "� 2011.. Institute of Tralnsponation Engincers. Trip Generatfon, 10th Edition_ An ITE; Informational Report, September 2117. Office 0f rel, I-011fl�er11al QLI.AitV Control. EA and ,EIS 0;,!,.w- a` ri; r; 1, Aeemed July 2019. StDl,ti 01 YI2�'ail. EM,3iLL'LMCI.'':1 oy; ] L''11i-Ip[r(jt:(?L'1. lrf?P,,h(-vand P! rte "ez hij t•,l, DL'S 2!]l if 201 2- 51au� of 1 lawaii, D, pnartinera of Transpoilatioin. Federal -.did Highways 2035 Tran partutiaa P"lcrn)&r• the fAttr'r4-t raf 1laLvaii, ,Itllv 201d, of Ilawaii, Depe'[iof Trt1fl�,JI L111rc7.1. }Ir.sIW-ic id Ie.,Uf:c'' Sr.a' iun .1 laps_ 2111 o- 11 risSia' ofllLikai,�pa.p1b-h., 2015. Sta%,, of Hawaii, DQpairtrnem {;t Staleivide Tran6portia!tion Impr°oventents Program, , ix—,-ti1;ed duly 2019. httptlfh w' lii. cjk'.'ciol h �tilxtisayslST1P . Stxc of Hawaii, Department of 'P aii q7S'--nation. Sici wide ilr3ijbrtn Design Manual .jbr Streets and Ffr > fr til crl::v. 1980. 'I'll Ural 'ii(: L.,1e1(2018). 1 #x 1 �1tI1L4: 96L�Liit La t�:111 C or sultont, f ualani ,'.fir,',c'? !; a0c 4'lr�rrltr: t . i ��fl iti 1 LY": -wt (2019). 1 ;L,i.,'l 4srt,lti+ n l2o. ::.c°1L Board, I rit7nal $tcsi:tr4 #1 C'r}11174 LI. Ifrrf. ;r<n ('ir,��rrc r .1Irr= aid- 1'+ ishingion, D.C., �tlltls'I]- 54 Appendix A Bus Route Schedule and Map Bus Route Schedule and Map 77� 9 i Rr. ti -i Lo y w it C- J L" L - 4 �' P r- r C i"� v ✓-1 47 _ n 4' Sf5 b v 1'k x. A ,.- i n{ Fr; IT Appendix B 24 -Hour and Peak Period Turn Movement Traffic Counts Type of peak hour being reported: User -Defined Method for determining peak hour. Total Entering Volume LOCATtCM: Pa[ani Rd — Hawaii Belt Rd QC JOB #: 14972601 CITY,%STAiTF: Hawaii, H1 DATE: Tut, Apr 3a 2019 sm 2w Peak -Hou r. 7.20 AQUI -- 810 AM ]A ?a 17? 3'2s 20 Pik 15 -Min: 7:30 AitiA -- 7:45 AM + r a6 1'I e r i b r i w. 1" w 71 1 P. 23 r 854 0 r Wt � `~ t 0 r Sl 457 + + Fi8: � t 163 r SM 'AM 2% 4111 �0 wr IDS % � '� F 3.7 t 75 11 1143 192 1�9I -1 *i ti � 7� Quality Counts S 22 I � � � �✓°" ��,� oe;o 1 1 r« a 1 ; a n w +a 4 4 Q t 1 C hldl r 1w NA J ss# t Nq M • � � NA �,f_ + II � I T T r ,--- i t I5 -folia CnunI rind P;71•-ini Pr: (Nufll :;ro,i,ul) IIn1.)rr H H,iw iii 4r:Ir ltd H;,w. r Rall Idri CA' +. Iri1,.rILI) [�1�1 he�urly fcs.,a R3I.eirrriin- A[Thi � � 14it Thru ttsrh Ll Ii:FI Tfrru Ri.til�r I1 Ic•i, Tlu�, F.ij;l•I I1 I,? -1 TI-r�, R�,h: I1 s. 6:A5 APA 7:� AM 43 18 25 51 35 25 1 5 55 17 1 11 51 38 175 3 7:1.5 AM - W=' 3,„' 51 39 27 t? '1` 51 26 0 4 a 78 13 1 41 38 4 20 13 X72 .38 r, 1.31 58 G 11 40 157 1 163 11 0 6,84 3379 1:45 AM 0n AM 63 55 28 G 58 39 29 a 1 7 F0 411 :} 70 S1 7 23 17 104 719 Fi r 11 S.3 0 45 4.1. 3,2,4 7 0 7. 4 3 r3 !i.56 671, 2500 767: 17 AMIR�n '1I.1 27 11 211 D 1.: is L) 22 a� :2'1 "1 0 13{, 1� o :3x "1 2z:i Idi 4 0 fiR3 131 769.1 7 740 fluvxreles Northboun-- IE?.fl -rliu Ni;li1 ll Southbound Ea5tbolind We5t6crund Total Iwfr Thru Ritht l} 1Fft Thru Right; U Ip.ft Thru Righl Li A 14'eh cles "aay Trucks 216 9 i Cl ? 0 52 < 524 231 0 62 7-8 HO 0 552 44 0 213 a 27]6 123 Pedestriwis Bicycles 0 3 l p 0 P 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 Railroad Russ red ?uenr5': Regortgenerated un 5113{2019' 1101 PM SOURCE. C2ualltyCounts, LLClhttp:llwww.giAdlitycours:5.iie.1 L-877-580-2212 Page 1 or 1 TV" of peak hour hung reported: User-Def Ined Method for determin I ng peak hour. Total Entering Volume LOCATlQN: PalanI Rd -- HawaiI Belt Rd QC JOB #i: 14972602 CI TY,%STATF: Hawaii, Hl DATE: Tue, Apr 30 2019 4n 5w Peal 4lour: 3:45 PM -- 4:45 PM 13 17 s 1t7v 313 51 Peak 15-N1rh: 3:45 PfV1 -- 4:00 PM 11•11 11L j ?� u r t +. Enw liffl] t9.8 2b+ « , r.sR#S P,M 1175 cl 7.1• 1 % !U* 22 m * �,--]# 3.1 OL7 12 1Q9CF 757 QuaLi'ty Counts *F 13 15 DATA THAT URNES (-.LI a'i1''1`d'T', • 0 6 U J i � a f 1 ,. 1 w • l � R a } r � +J fl fl KIA + 1 c r r .. . NA MA �. .� I' F 1S Min (:narnt f'�iic iJ ;ll, nl lEr; �fUprvl :;rolilul) IIn1.)rr Hr1 [t; a 'Iku+iirlrJ� H;iw m �F._, 4rIr Rd II; .InIJl H;,w. 1 Rall lirl i'w".rt % I,i11.rIJ) [�1�1 he�urly L:b.vi Kpp : irrim;, (tl let: Thru R'�,hk Ll lial Tfrru Ri.til�r lJ Ic•i, Tlut, Rij;l•I 41 II>=1 TI -r,, Rah: lJ 5. l "V "v1 56 7F 61 } 13 } Z9 sf, 75 E11 t34 J ;5E 8 - s11 P.M ?-45 PM 77 51 SG 55 82 65 f1 0 15 G4 ?7 21 93 29 n 7 Si 55 '.4:> 198 1'I r, 131 1 ) 56 ?58 4 154 11 0 rr: 952 3670 ❑0 Pm '5 Pm 52S7 46 73 59 61 i l7 9 74 27 12 79 32 D ❑ 6fl G{1 7?7 ?13 17s' F) 1.31 0 5fi 543 177: 3 0 321A 6 0 945 941; 3674 3732 A. 30 Pm 46 75 73 } 0 1z7 1.9 1) 1a ?313 1D!' 1 55 141 15 D �If, 1711 1 S PM 1-( C Pm 59 71 613 67 79S) ci 1 16 94 37 11 69 3n 4 0 65 63 .713 7?5 121 L] 1 11 1177 52 1L,1 17 0 15$ a 1, 8S? I. -7 :'•: tJ .%I -.3u P.m EA 58 6E, 47 15 55 a 0 d 91 34 3 GG 19 0 D Ell, 4G :7!r `Gy 1 D 1 11 94 0 G3 57 142 a f} 120 a t} i.:.'r 1:5 SA5PM 51 88 so 0 1 7 59 13 0 39 i6--11: 69 1 41 10= 9 0 451 ,(;_ Peak 15 Alin Northbound Souihbour►d Fastbaund' Westbound FIrSw'ratEs Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right Ll b2ft Thru Right U Left Thru Ri hL U Total A Ue .G ex heauy Trucks ?7.0 3?$ 7f 1r, ❑ 4 i1 R4 377 1 i6 0 $ D b 77,6 1� 797 zo 574 4 H 7Ti ❑ 6`6 44 4 414 0 3$174 117 PFdestriafl5 Bacycles 0 0 ❑ 0 (1 D D 0 4 0 ❑ ❑ 4 ❑ G 17 Ri l-jkoad Stopped Buses f'r7YJ71MCr, f P eport generated on 5f1.3/2p1y .;:06 PPA 5C7URCE: Quality f vents, 4LC (http;flwww•Plualitycnuats,net} 1 877 a9tJ 271.2 Page 1 or 1 Type of peak hour being reported: User -Defined Method for determining peak hour. Total Entering Volume LOCATtCM: Henry St -- Hawaii Beit Rd QC JOB #: 14972603 CITY/STATE: Hawaii, HI DATE: Tue, Apr 30 2019 1� 91d Peak -Hou f: 7:20 ANI -- 810 AM a5 3ri i ♦ DA 2;w�, Peak 15 -Min: 8:15 AM -- 8:30 AM + All sxi xv : a r * 11:9 ss 1.x.1 j !Nn * IM % e a * ice± a: �0 na r SJ8 * b.; LAG 337 42 a-ts z7 7 Sas 525 UaU LyCounts * 3I .t i o 0 IJ i 4L A 3 a 7 r 0 y 4 1C JN � J >� � RA NAI � NA� � . 4 # � . f 4 �1 t I f r I � .r 74 t F IS -Min Cnunt Period Hertry 5( (NurlhboLi d kenry tit Southbound) H,iw iii 4r:Ir ltd H;,w. r Rall Iwri % I IH11.rILI) o1al Hrouri Rpg,reningAt i.aft Thru Right U Left Thru Right U lc -t Thm Fl. iji•I 41 6:A5 0.P11 31 57 5 0 i7 48 26 D 1C'. ; + G 7:DDAM 7:15 AM 32 40 13 44 81 8 6 a 109 :112. 69 20 0 78 25 0 19 27 f 16 D 1.8 0 - 7:36 AM 24 Lit 7 6 78 58 35 4 112 40 0 ;,7 124 7:19 A Q:DC.Ars9 34 8i 7 aR} 193 15 G (] 92.. F36 rya 31 1 KS Z£, 3 73 27 77 D 53 30 0 .3 115. {} 7fi5 117 0 71; 7,97 :..1 , 3053 8:15 AM 50 81 12 4 89 77 37 0 Z5 97 37 17 16 184 86 4 794 1 3069 E:3E,AM 4b r.9 la cl L S+1 63 .ao �U 3S L) ab 163 91 0 1ST I 3ri5E Prak 1rMIn Northbound Southbound Eastbound westbound F14pwrate5 IE?r1 Thru RiShl L1 Ioft Thru Right 1.) 1Fft Thru Right Al Ii?.ft Thru Righl La Total A. 11r'eh cles 200 324 48 0 356 30B 148 Q 10D 3-H 148 0 76 736 344 0 3176 heavy Trucks 4 16 A 12 B 0 0 3115 16 4 44 20 164 Pedestriais 0 4 12 4 16 Bicycles Railroad 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 6 2 2 XI0PPLd Russ �[+i Ftf r'd YlfCS': Regortgenerated on 5113{2019 1101 PM SOURCE. C2ual tyCounts, LLClhttp:llwww.giAdlitycoura:s.iie.1 L-2177-580-2212 Page 1 or 1 TV" of peak hour hung reported: User-Def Ined Method for determin I ng peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATlQN: Henry St -- Hawaii Beit Rd QC JOB #: 14972604 CI TY,%STATF: Hawaii, HI DATE: Tue, Apr 30 2019 m KU Peak -flour: 3:45 PM -- 4.45 PM w Za I { Peak. 15 -Min - 3:45 PM— 4:00 PM Ij +. { M4. r 3,90 j 6 114 & E34 14,& 4.7 1 ,,.`~'`�„. f. 1.9 4. 3.1 E63 s � a Se13 + t-42 1114 r N1% r 72 r iw cl 22 • 03 f 0 t ]!I # IM 338 34 J— %1 0 n 7B Quality Counts *F N 17 DATA THAT URNES (-.LI a ifN'T', ' 0 i n t, � I a 1 a ran � r Na U."r � l -10 r NA # w t � I j I • NAy 7 � � f IP IF 1 i Min (.o4mI f'�iit'il Henry St �NarlhLlr?lIr1C{ Hvnry 4i $[fs, 'ikuaiirirl� H;iw m �F._, 4rIr Rd li; .iniJf H;,w. r Rall IZ41 1'w"di+. kH11.rILI) [�1�1 he�uriy AlL�.liS l"ti Thru Right U lwft Thru Ri hr lJ Ic•i, Tlum Rij;l`I 41 le>=1 TI—,j RPh: l) I tt 43 74 9 0 91 53 63 b 3 "41 ? fj Dm 29 42 95 9 R5 2 f 0 4 1117 84 $3 52 7.3 41 0 Q 46 56 i55 155 54 0 58 0 18 119 1 76 k} 34; U. 0 873 R71 3-4=.Pm 31 73 12 G9 -9R0 51 9 a5 182 67 R 17 147 74 0 877 3482 'I DO PM 35 71 7 } F30 N 54 r} q0 if,1 Gia fi 14 127 73 0 826 X445 ;.' S Pm A. 30 Pm 29 34 a E1 H7 D Q R8 81 70 34 98 51 ❑ 11 5.1. 54 °6?fi 'Y2 73 7 82 0 7S 1{a 149 R11 Q 126 R-4 a? 2359 S73 343.1 '44:36 1 S Pm 2a _':r. a 87 B❑ 47 4 55 I GB 611 0 10 11'_4 F5 0 829 3388 O;Isl1 49 30 z1 ::': 1 < :; 81 78 S7 S:l ;8 9 0 4fl 49 56 :L2 12 0 1 1) 8 12 1�s SO 4} ;27 H {} f41J 8R. 3394 4 -MO -,.3u PM 27 * I 0 41 tS0 36 0 12 118 S3 0 696 3163 SA5PM 1r{ t:. 0 is 163 40 0 5 10- 77 0 1 585 3019 Peak 15 Min Flowrales Leif Nwthtjoun,} Thru Right U Left SSmr'Ihuurld Thru Right Ll Fastl6nund' Westbound Total Left Thru Rl ht U Left Thru Right U A ue .c es I-eauy Trucks 174 S 788 483 a p 0 395 4 37D 704 4 ❑ 0 486 779 1� 768 0 0 &8 a 588 795 4 36 a 3508 G3 Pe,dessrianz 0 v $ 1z a0 134cycles 0 a 0 p ❑ D 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ f4 Stopped buses f'r7YJ71MCr, f R eport generated on 5f13/?ply .;:06 PPA SCURCE: Quality f vents, 4LC (http;flwww,pualitycnuals,net} 1 877 a9tJ X71.2 Page I or 1 Type of peak hour being reported: System, leak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATLQN: Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy-- Hualalai Rd (Northern Most) QCJOB #l: 15039901 CITY/STATE: KaiCua, HI ®ATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 Peak -"our. 7:001 AM -- 8:00 AM a 16 # 3e ii6 0 peak 15 -Min: 7:15 AM -- 7:30 AM } } Q b.2 U J } d 194 A. Ad G+ 0 a w a a, 0 4. 0! 0. # 0 4. 0 « 0 92 r 48 1 B a r o o• 0 s f O t 0 V4 * F - -M821 � { ,g * F 114 QuaLity Counts 5.9 17 DATA THAT ORWS CClVU(INIT'; '� 0 o 1 U J i � G � Y fl fl W * L N4 L 4 1 t r } i @UY r r nLi i . raA . t `,A • f 1', Mil (,]lint F'K,imd r_litee- K'i:rhuin:inuFtwy (NmIl :;roi,iid) s` ijeen K, Punt, tri Hw-j Hiial,ilai Ri(R,vlhrrn hlasli H.�I,I i lu; (4, r,hrr h1r, 11 -. Ikti 11.rILI) [a1c1I Totals Rpp: Trim..' Al Left Thru Mght U 1wft Thru RiA ht U Icdi ThilJ Right U lets Thru R:vh: 11 1 17 rrt 7:1.5 AM 28 339 0 3.6 263 0 0 0 0 0 190 4 4 212 11 0 5 0 9 0 18 17 0 0 0 .i 4 a 0 0 472 549 7.30 AM 7:45 AM 32 260 0 C43 223 0 0 D 0 0 198 3 0 174 T D 24 0 14 0 fi 0 10 Q 0 n 0 0 0 r1 0 0 536 4qn 7017 8DOitM A;1 q A l,A 3.9 229 0 'di 232 0 6 0 0 11) lE4 d 0 1 F,9 a 0 0 C 7 0 (7 1H Ll n it 0 0 a 0 0 0 4,: 4:5,4 1017 !,%2 $:3UAM &AS AM 34 22- 6 37 354 u 1 0 0 0 118 I Cl 1,r?2 2 0 { 16 1 0 c 12 0 U a G 0 0 G 0 0 46 4%; :.1n I've k 5-Wn Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound r1ates L.1Sf1. Thrw Right U Wt Thru Right U Litt Thru Righn U felt Thru Right U Taal A l 4'eh des I-eavV Trucks 144 1052 0 0 2z 0 0 0 0 8.46 44 0 40 0 36 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21.96 64 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 4 0 1} 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RailmLad Stopped Bums Ci'Pmr"enr3: Report generated on 9112/20191U:40 AM SCURCE: Quality Cnunts, LLC ihttp:J/www.gtAalitycourtrti.neti 1-17`7-58x0-2212 Page 1 or 1 Type of peak hour being reported' System Peak Method for determining peak hour. Total Erlteringllolume LOCATI[CFN: Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy-- Hualalai Rd (Northern Most) QC JOB A.- 15039902 CITY/5TATF. Kal[Ua, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 'L'a 933 eaiCC1U(::00 -' +�: ].4 36 +*L 11 14 6 D Peak 15 -Min: 3:30 PM — 3:45 PM + r 13 10r L t r.I x1r 10! L u n o ay ..a, I r a of t d« 0 pfr"y�o �0#71i1 r�� o a#os ` eo#a 7 84 a 923 r� -14a 7 0 *F 103 ]LSP 1I QuaLi'ty Counts s 13 3,i DATA THATURPVE-S f1P.4LJf M1lT'; ' 0 6 U J i 4 G � 9 1 fl • a ras �, rur; 4 J ; L } 4 @UY r r nLi i . raA . t %A PI Mil l0Imil Fli'I and 1.1u,'r^ K-I:rhulr:inll Hwy [I�fll l':il71J11[l iiry rrn h•srFurrr -m Hw-j 4tJ{111 •Ill,lllllll� Hi,al,ilal R i (R,vlhrrn A9n,l} ;�. `� iil.lrllll H �I:,I I lir (k;>rthrrn h•1r�ttJ iW�i z'l l,f lllfl� Wal Hourly totals FiL ''llrr4111' !iI n let: Thru R' hk Ll II?F1 Thiu Ri"hr U } Iri, Thru Ri int U II>=1 TI- ,, Ri hl U ? 00 PM 3 ';',=, Pq 27 119 1 227 17 24? 0 2.59 4 0 3 4 tT C1 24 i is 1l I' 0 4 0 0 525 521 3-710 nM 22 26 7 242 3 0 0 0 is 1i^ 0 0 546 yr,..;t'41 ]Fa ?1 ,747 4 0 3 Q in 1' ,. 0 0 7U7 730 .4:00 PM 4-':5 i:M 14 :%.i6 0 22 2: 0 .. 11) 758 4 0 225 4 0 1 3 0 0 1L 0 23 D 0 0 0 ?} Q 0 ? 7LLt7 R 7, 4:3L'IM 445PM1 14 198 0 24 218 0 L6 ❑ 0 0 200 2 232 11 0 S 5 0 0 21 0 27 0 R a 0 0 ❑ 0 5100 PM 5_ a PM 12 178 0 17 =a5 0, 4 0 0 0 2$7 6 0 252 z 0 3 4 0 0 30 0 xg n 0 n 0 0 0 Cl 5:30 PP S:�I5PM 15 195 0 13 1-l7 0 0 0 0 � 225 3 0 352 3 7 0 0 0 0 11 0 16 u 0 u 0 0 0 U ?` WIC `e:l i4t,6 18711 Peak 1S Min Northtiound SEJullihound Fastbound' 11desi.40und rlowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru night J left Thru Wight U Leh Thru Bight U Total A ue .G -, F-eauy Trucks 88 9344 o 0 Sb 0 0 n !l 968 1.7 0 a l7 0 0 0 0 77 0 D f1 a 0 0 4 a a 2184 Fi4 Pedestrians e4cycles 0 0 0 0 it D n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ it V Fti�-Ik oad Stopped buses f a3Yl'1117CPf is Report generated on 011212013 10:f3 AM SCURCE: Quality f kints, 4LC 1.2. Page 1 or 1 Type of peak hour being reported: System Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATLQN: Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy-- Hualalai Rd (Southern Most) QCJOB #i: 15039911 CITY/STATE. Kai[La, HI ®LTE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 @1 il10 Peak -"our. 7:00 AM -- 8.00 AM 5 !s + f I c4 'ro t3 II peak 15 -Min: 7:{31M — 7:45 AM* I + ¢ U 4.9 Si L .! 4 11 .! # M. 0 * O r 0 + • B -T] CI -14 F 757 M QuaLit 1 Counts 49 i8 DATA THATURW5 CCTV 'Jr IT'; '� 0 I L 0 1 1 J i � L t o G 70 1 fl KIA L. 4 1 w1 i t `;A • f 1'a-twlidi i_rir,tYt Period L.1ij+"r n NL;r:rhi,ir-..inir Hwy she=en K,s" Fmirn 'iu Hvry Hi�altllai 11 1 �4rr�ilhr-rr M«.I ;• H� alai h^ Itio:,i. horn Mns[f Total Hourly ko—als. RF ir,nhrt AL 6 it i.el: Thru tti kti U 1 wft Thru Right U I eft Fhru lei rt ll I eh Thru Ri hr t3 7:01} AM 7:15AM C 24L 3 q n 267 ; 9 73 163 0 0 191 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 12 4 0 35 0 448 523 7:30Alvi r• 267 B 'I 23 193 n 0 p 0 0 0 0 37 0 5.35 7 0;W r ; 1 �1 I:� IFI n ;7 0 C D i rl 56 0 49; 9r+r11 R,':Or, AM C sl 1.1 17 I'll) 0 1. 0 C: D 6 0 7❑ ?) 4AID 1'.?L5r H:'15 AM U:3L-AM {j (i 'j _ .. 1777 0 0 1�?2 Q 0 0 C D 0 0 (i Li L' 0 13 %1 G 17 {i 4n? 44,ai 1 191 1 L2311 2:'15 Arvl c 2? 1 1 177 0 0 0 C D L' io is 487 18318 I've k kli�r Northherund Southbound Eastbound Westbound F15ates loll Thru Rif ht k1 I NL Thru! R t U Left Thru Rlghn U lel` Thru Right u ToLai A l 4'eh des I-eavV Trucks 0 1368 32 a 0 4 4 "2 8 i72 0 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L1 23 0 14a 4 0 0 4 214:0 52 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ll 1 2 Railrpad Stopped Bums +a i'Pmr"enr3: Report generated on 9112,1201510:40 AM SCURCE: Quality Cnunts, LLC ihttp:J/www.gtAalitycourrti.neti 1-87`7-580-2212 Page 1 or 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Systern Peak MethDd for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATLQN: Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy-- Hualalai Rd (Southern Most) QCJOB #i: 15039912 CITY,%5TATF. KaiCua, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 ,� 1813 Peak -Hour: 3:00 PM -- +4:00 PM ,3 3 s } � €1 !w5 dl Peak 15 -Min: 3:174 PM -- 3:15 PM � + + >.s * R R i t ]y ♦ bi 3J + P # ti1A« ZA 0 0 S R L4 a, 6d cl 0+ 0% P PA i 79 7 0 W f 0 I] 0 *F 90 Quality Counts 1.6 3A DATA THATURW5 CCTV (INIT'; '� L7 0 6 U J i � 1 p! 4 0 G � a} t 0 0 fl KIA L. 4 1 i hL7 r r NA raA y t `,A • f l:a-Min {:Dunt PeriDd 1.111+'r ^ K-i:rhilin-inir Hwy (NmII :;roi,iid) she=en K,s" Elia,; •,Ll Hwy $[fsi 'ih,aiirirJj Hil.il,ilai ki,i �4rr�ikhr-rr M•�'.I} Far, li;,.ini1l H� ,i,l�i h:; (tio:,i.Ihi'rn M<SL� iw.'e+. kriiisrsrl r(,Cal hourly Beginning hlro—als. Lott Thru Rs k,'r U Lwft Thru Right U Iri; Thru Ri N kJ la°i Thru R; ht 11 :SCf'F 4 242 0 0 14 258 0 1 4 0 4 0 5 0 21 0 543 :1 PN 3:3D FILA 0 217 2 0 259 1 D 0 17 14 I$h 0 0 246 0 11 0 0 a 0 0 r 0 0 '4 1 rl 13 iI 0 19 0 ;1a 340 3;45 PM Q 287 3 D L4 2,45 9 1 0 0 ❑ 0 A n I R G U15 71175 4-cle P!1 t C 20:! 0 4 7_5 772 0 .7 0 C ❑ 0 k ❑ 11 it 3 1 1 7.077, 47', S PM 4:30 Put U 24Z 1 U 2(17 2 D l} to 14 144 0 0 2% D 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 p 0 2 1 A 6 0 Q 11 0 5€r, 441, 2061 1962, 4:45 PM 5 00 PM U 213 5 0 199 1 ❑ D 15 LS 2511 0 0 2bS 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1) U 4 ❑ 14 0 Q 12 k 497 40.; 1954, 19 .13 r il" ":A P.M U 2US 0 0 i98 1 ❑ 0 4 6 2% 0 0 2468 0 3 ,s n tl, 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 0 lis 0 0 5 0 Y13 4:18 1 s. '6 145 5:45 PM 4 163 1 0 7 247 0 1 .I) 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 421 1877 Peak 15 linin Flowrates Northbound S4Ulhbound Fastbaund Westborind Total Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right J Left Thru R1 ht U Left Thru !t1 ht U A7 ue ces Hewy Trucks n 968 0 a 12 0 0 56 4 1437 D a 7n ❑ 0 0 0 a 0 0 D 70 a 4 84 0 ❑ 0 7164 3F PFdeStriail5 Bacytles Q C1 0 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ 0 Q 0 ❑ ❑ Q ❑ G V ��lur�d Stopped 6LLses f a3Yl'1117CPf is Report generated on 911212013 10:43 AM SCURCE: Quality f kints, 4LC (http;flwww,pualitycnuats,net} 1 877 a9tJ X71.2 Page I or 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Systern leak Method for determining peak hour: Total Enteringvolurn4e LOCATLCFN: Queen Kaahu rrlanu Hwy -- Puapuaanul St. QC JOB W: 15039905 CITY/5TATF: Kai[La, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 1M 1m Peak -"our: 7:00 AM -- 8.00 AM 47 ?-3 # } I 0 t1t1 -03 peak 15 -Min: 7:15 AM -- 7:30 AM � + } a R R► t 3i r 2 r2 3J r P aF t, 1b r 11 a. a% r 87 r 5) 0+ 0% f 0 t 15 F }I @36 877 Qua Li ty Cour? + 4s * } 43 74 DATA THATURFW5 CC,JM1r1PllUMTH'i I I e y97 4 aw o G 9 1 fl KIA • f 1', Mil (0mil F'K,i and 1.1u+'r K;i:rhuin:inu Ftwy (N[w1l :;ro md) s` ijeen Ks' Fuy, rrw HWY I 1.1pil-'lona. Y I imi-11 ,;;in 1Y •".I 11.rILI) [71111 Hourly Totals Rp.eirrnin-� A[ I,pt: Thru Its rh,i U 1 P.ft Thru Right U I eit Thru F.i/gH U I rr°i Thru R:Vh; U ?:Df) AM 7:1.5 AM C 'c24 5 0 246, 3 0 6 17 1 8 171 0 0 184 Q 0 0 0 i, ,) G 0 0 0 11 211 13 2-1 0 to 48 0 4550 509 7.34 AM 7:44 AM C 2091 4 t1 174 12 a 7 12 I I IRS 0 0 17 5 p D 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 A 28 28 0 48 0 0 57 0 489 462 1,910 R: DO Am H: 15 AM C 1F$ 10 {j 2R 15 G iq 9 1.9 I65. D D 154 fi 0 0 0 C ❑ a C D D 78 °3 ❑ 39 a C 3D 0 459 44a 1.9 19 1F50 u:H-AM 2:,15 AM U 22U 11 C 2.5 11 G a 16 Ill 179 ll U 154 to b 0 0 it Ll 0 c D 0 11 17 0 31. 0 0 23 0 468 459 L829 1: iti I've k 15 -Mils Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound rkMVdte5 1011 Thru Right U Left Thru RO t U Lott Thru Righn U lel` Thru R9gh1 U ToLal A l 4'eh des I-eavV Trucks 0 984 1.2 0 20 0 ( 32 4 73fr d 0 20 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 0 80 0 0 197 4 0 8 20'3f 52 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 0 a 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [1 0 „ ail L Rad Stopped Bums Ci'Pmr"enr3: Report generated on 9117,1201510:40 AM 5C URGE: Quality Cnunts, LLC lhttp:J/www.gtAalitycourtti.neti 1-87`7-580-2212 Page 1 or 1 Type of peak hour bcing reported' System Peak Method for determining peak hour. Total Erlteringllolume LOCATI[CFN: Queen Kaahu rnanu Hwy -- Puapuaanul St. QC JOB W: 15039-gN CITY/5TATF. KaF[Ua, HI DATE: Thu, Aug 29 2019 Peak -flour: 3:00 PM -_ +4:00 PM L4 3 # } V 9W1i2 Peak 15 -Min: 3:30 PIyA — 3:45 PM I + } Q L7 tl �JI R R► t W7 r W 3J # P J *.,t7 r 35 a# r S r 14 # Im {1 # O S f 0# 1_1 } 9W on Quality Counts 1.6 2A DATA THATURWS €=C,JM UMTif 'i I I L 1 0 6 U IL t AL— R! 40 G D "I S- Q 7 9 0 fl hU7 r # hlA a WI # +F M • f 1', Mil (,]lint F'K,imd Ourr ^ K-i:rhuin:inu Ftwy (Nm rl :;roi,iid) s` ijeen K, Punt; irHwy $[fs, 'ih++iirirlj Ii 1.1pii;rini. Y E;a, li; .infill u I .gri ,;;in 11Y 1'w".'t % I IH11.rILI) Hourly Totals Kpp : irrim;, nlR i.el: Thru fits hk U 1wft Thru Right U Iris Thru Ri 1�t U a7 Thru, R; IiE 11 3 00 P.M 305rp l 9 199 14 205 14 0 G 3? 231 0 0 27 2d3 G J {} •:} 0 0 0 Ci a 0 17 0 23 0 0 23 311 ;24 3f1`pM 0. 2301 12 D 37 713 n 0 0 0 {} 0 ? 0 77 0 328 rwr U 1'7' .9 0 1! 21'l n r) n n n 0 ti f 14 41 4511} 2052 1:00 P \A 47', S PM U 192 U 207 1- G q .1.1 :` 15 0 0 '.;, ;i p 0 3 0 C 0 0 0 0 rl 12 11 0 16 i A 35 r 496 1., 2037 2028 4:30 PM 4:45 PM U 1, 1 lu U 209 is (} ❑ I !2 $ >} [ ]? 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 13 0 1.2 {i 0 29 0 421 512 L921 19su 5 00 PM -:;Y 11 r1+1 t7 159 7 U 795 11 4 0 J 1.9 0 4 A, .•19 0 15 !� Q 0 0 0 0 4 2 Q 1l {y 0 0 454 491 1948 1854 ":A P.M 5:+15 PM f 7Y 1G 0 ,.l :vo 0 3 ,t. _+1 n .� 0 0 0 0 0 a 10 7 0 22 0 0 23 0 469 419 1926 1833 Peak 15 Min Flowrates Northbuunal Left Thru Right U "(mr•ik,mirld Lett Thr;x Right U Fastbound' Westbound Total Left Thru R1 ht U Left Thru Right U A ue ,G es Heauy Trucks n 9ZO 463 a 28 4 0 7+18 B57 p 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u 35 U 4 10 Q ❑ 12 2117 as Pedestrianz Bacytles Q 0 0 0 0 0 ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ P ❑ G C F7eilrryad Stopped awQs C. a3Yl'1117CP f i s Report generated on 911212015 10:f -1 AM SOURCE: Qualityfraunts, 4LC (tlttp;flwww,pualitycnur+ls,net} 1 877 a9tJ X71.2 PagL a or 1 TV" of peak hour hung reported: User-Def kned Method for determin I ng peak hour. Total Entering Volume LOCATtCM: Kuaklni Hwy -- Hawail Belt Rd QC JOB #: 14972605 CITY,%STAiTF: Hawaii, Hi DATE: Tut, Apr 3a 2019 o Peak -"our.- 7:20 AM -- 9.20 AM a a } } L tl d kr Peak1.5-Min: 7-30 AM -- 7:45 AM j } # {7 rr U J } 4 r t rr 0 J L 0• Lts b P J i. u r U 733 r F�q * W1 v 7,2 •• « i.l. M.6 61 % a517r Sm C r.l44.9 f'1.3f 66 7 0 uu r� U -1 F 57B 1'76 Q u a L I ty Counts 1.6 3,i DATA THATURNE-S € DVIVMUr"N1TI 'i 0 6 U J i � i, -1 F_ 1 la fl fl L + 1 P * 4 i J a 4 t i i h15 r NA �. a MA•,A f FIP IS -Min Cnunr Period Kuakim Hwy (NurllIh0LIrr[1) KLUIl l Hwy H;iw iii 4rIr Rd H;:1•r,. 1 Rill Iwri CAP -%I IH 11.riLI) I[�1�1 he�urly rG.,als. rap irmiri A[ 6 � I.4ft 7hrr[ ft'sRhr U Irft Thru Ri hr I1 Ic•i, TI7,�, Rij;l•I I1 le>=1 TI- �, Rah: I1 6:45Arv1 7:00 AM 2 0 37 R 0 3A 0 0 0 C. 0 C r D 0 p 21as 3 0 7: 65 =d 240 0 0 }i.,: 7:15 AM 7:3C .+M 3 n 45 3 0 44 0 0 : 0 n n 6 0 7 0 0 70'- I, 0 m 1.7 0 85 414 234 4 0 2 I 0 0 3 604 2247 7:45Arv1 &:UQAM Q 4a 0 36 0 a 0 n 0 [} } r_1 r,. 0 0 7 150 20 n Sfi3 17 0 189 118 156 0 a ?07 0 0 562 537 2297 27116 R: 15 AM !1 0 49 G ii r] D 0 1 T 12 0 'm 2�:i 0 t3 -,4"1 71S] H:3UAM 2 U S'. U D U U D ID 1132 12 U 7U 230 0 0 li0y Peak 1"rArlln Northbound Southbound Ea5tbflund Westbound Flowrates f pri Thru Righl I1 I oFk Thru Right U I Fft ThrU Right ll I eft Thru Right U 7°tel A I Veh cles "aay Trucks 12 0 1761 0 13 -0 ra 17 CI 0 0 0 0 0 832 68 0 56 8 455 0 872 0 0 24 0 2416 86 Pedestriwis Bicycles 0 (1 t) 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4' 2 Railroad XIOPPLd filrsfs �[+i Ftf r'd YlfCS': Regortgenerated on 5113{2019' 1101 PM SOURCE: C2ualltyCounts, LLC ihttp://www.giAdlitycours:s.11e:l L-2177-580-2212 pagL a or 1 TV" of peak hour hung reported: User-Def Ined Method for determin I ng peak hour. Total Entering Volume LOCATtCM: Ktlaklnf Hwy -- Hawail Belt Rd QC JOB #i: 14972606 CI TY,%STATF: Hawaii, H1 DATE: Tue, Apr 30 2019 o Peak4lour: 3:45 PM -- 4:45 PM a a � } L t� d tr Peak 15 -Min: -4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM I + � U IL J } 4 11� - 367 r d t R 0+ IM W 854 ;1 4. 6! S9 + *. 0 r Zf3 r 33 923 r M % e 243 r ]2'.H 71 • &6 ti ! 1.6 * 1A 3 ; r 23 0 3n w � r 7.1 n n 279 ass Quality Counts 1 (13 DATA THATURfVE-S CC, MPllUMTI 'i 40 1 0 n n J i 4 G � Lt fl fl L 4 _1 + ~ rA. � -1 t `:A F 15 -Min ColinI Pvl� if:d h11:1kin -iv,ry (Nmil :;ro-md) Ku, ,ml Hwy H;iw m 4rIr Rd H;,w. r Rill lirl CAr -% I IH11.rldj o1al hourly Kpp : irrim;, Alr lira: TI'i•'u 11x h,i U left Thru Ri hr tJ Ic•i, Tluu Rij;l`I 41 le? -1 TI -r,, RPh: tJ il,) 'V 3.15 Ph1 76 6 0 75 0 } ;) ry C. C' r D 0 23- 19 0 59 21-) } 606 3:30 PV. 3.45 PM 3 9 &r 0 0 76 0 t0 1 0 t} G n {1 6 4 205 -223 15 0 6 fl 18 57 217 0 317 @ 4 ;7J 5$ s )-ia;; •1 no PAA .SPM 3 0 97 4 a 1❑1 5 } 1) D r; 0 Q {i P 0 0 7,n gal 1 n D L5 0 so 55 715 4 4 i1d ti G fin; 6t3 gar: 4,34Pm 1 6 4 1% 13 til r, 31 D n 23P 1 U 71 201 0 0 bat. :! Icrr• 4:45 PM 5'04 PM U 212 2 0 Ica u :] v :} U U I} 6 U J 0 a 20S 27,5 7 U 9 U 78 66 725 D 4 18' 4 1, 6.3j 39r' 1': . )'PI: 5_ ",Pm 530 Pm a 17 0 0 1C2 U 0 1) I; I) G 4 €} D 4 4 279 223 11 1) 7 0 39 54 i7 0 {} 1311 4 0 53". °5211' ... , 5:4 5 Pm 2 0 76 0 4 0 0 0 4 243 13 U 58 176 t i> _' L Peak 15 Min Northboiln,l Soull,k,nund Fasts ound' Wesk4ound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right Lf left Thru Wight U Left Thru Bight U 1ULdl A Ug .c ex Featry Trucks 16 a 4{34 a a o a 0 0 {Y Q o D D a o MA 1.6 64 0 8 zTt7 4 �i5 �] 0 ?s a 7444 5G PedeStriail5 Bicycles 0 a ❑ o i1 D n D 0 4 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ it V I}i�.Ik oad Stopped Buses f'r7YJ71MCr, f ; : P eport generated on 5f13/?ply 3:06 PPA SCURCE: Quality f amts, 4LC 1.2 PagL a or 1 TV" of peak hour being reported: SysteEn flak Meth®d for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATIQN: Kuaklnl Hwy -- Lako St QC JOB #i: 15039907 CITY/STATE: Holualoa, HI ®LTE: Thu, Aug 79 2019 1310 Peak -Hour: 7:00 AM -- 8.00 AM s + L6 #:17 111 Peak 1.5 -Min: 7:45 AI1+1 — 8:00 AM + + 2.4 '3n 51 .0 4 4 J } U 1190 Z% t A. XT r$2L ISO 2 J # 1.9r 1.9 q6 w � t 35 369.6 63 t l E9 0 MA C I 1.9 # 1A % t n rt 45 } 55 1 } t U *F ]d5 887 Qua Li ty Counts 32 13 DATA THATURNE-S CC,JM MWTH •i 0 6 U J i � t, -1 F- 70 i a NA r r "L f ' NA y Y Y 14 t %A 4r to. F 1 5 -Min Cnunt Period KUakinr HWY INarlhbOLInrl KuaS wi Hwy S()qj;,dried) LjknI�t take)St Total Hroea9ls Beginning At Loft Thru Right U t aft Thru Right U 1 eft Thru Right Ll I eft Thru Ri h1 u ?:W AM 7.15 AM 13 2211, 1, 5 9 188 1.4 4 l 34 36 152 t8 154 35 0 13 41 66 4 13 0 9 21 0 9 17 6 53 0 7 61 0 559 616 7.317 AM 7.45 AM 6 202 15 6 181 11 0 e)7 14 37 171 36 170 26 0 0 57 77 11 19 0 24 16 0 16 27 1.0 57 0 13 86 0 615-1 674 2533 R:DO t,M 9:'1SAM 3 206 17 6 %Lq 17 n q J7 19 145 24 1f.5 L6 D 0 55 +14 18 11 n 5 6 0 13 1•'r 7 65 0 ' SI +J 601 770 Z: e)4: 7+1919 H:10AM E:a•= AM d >20 1G 9 2L6 2L) 0 U :40 A6 livLl 22' 1' 0 is 17 D 77 1 10 0 I;: 9 0 1S 13 6 70 ? 8 CI4 U f24 s9fi 2469 2393 Irak 1rMln Flvwrates Northbound 5outlhbound Eastbflund Westbound Total Ipf1 Thru Righl I1 I PFt Thru Right 1.) 1 Fit Thru Right Il I V.ft 11ru Right Ll A I Veh cles "aay Trucks 24 724 44 0 8 4 -0 14S t6 E8D 104 210 4 0 344 0 9E 64 0 0 0 kcz 4 52 344 0 0 8 26913 90 Pedestriwis Bicycles 0 0 _ 4 t} 0 0 0 1, 0 0 0 4 0 Ll 0 2 Railroad Sto ed Russ Cu F ?uvnr5': Fiegortgenerated on 91121201910:40 AM SOURCE. QualltyCounts, LEClhttp:ffwww.qudlitycour1:5.11e.1 L-2177-580-2212 PNgL a or 1 TV" of peak hour being reported: System P�ealc Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATI[CM: Kuaklnl Hwy -- Laka 5t QC JOB #: 15039909 CI TY/STATF: Holualna, I -ll DINE: Thur Aug 29 2019 um 1n74 Peak -Hour: 3:40 FIM -- 4:09 Pi1+1 12 ar; # 176 1577 1151 Peak 15 -Min: 3:15 PM - 3:30 PM + } a6 0j, 33 .0 ♦ 4 J # 4 Z% 4. 1121 t k 199 r 414 U a 39 t ` R V r 41 s � zas r M t l 0 279 cl 29 • 2.1 % � e 15 . 255 __1# il'. t[ _1# *F f, a�b Quality Counts 1 32 DATA THAT URfWS CC,JM1r UUMTH 'i 0 0 6 U J i 4 L 0 J R 0 i, � a} t 70 0 OF @U7 r PA NA r . w m Ip 15 -Min CnunI Period KLIAlm Hwy (Nnr11h4.nurrdJ Kttakmi Hwy (Sou;M141and) Llko .�I Fatilln ijmd Lako 5t kbound jWw.,tall Total Hour ly 'fourly B3 -.ginning At i.aft Thru Right U I Mi Thru Ri ht U 1 eft Thru Right U I aft Thru Ri hl U 3 Ll0 P.M 13 190 20 0 42 216 38 0 27 5 10 0 23 9 51 4 544 3:: 5 PL1 7 192 19 0 51 2A3 45 0 2R 8 14 1; 12 4 46 0 G73 3.30 P1+1 12 196 17 t7 "1 211 41 0 39 8 7 0 lb 11 63 0 662 i n; Pry] , 176 9 11 ;7 7f,7 1 17 31 9 17 a 11 ?t1 11 0 GO 7487 .1 an PM 13 13' 1.?, ', "I)6 ; , D 33 14 1.2 n 17 8 35 ?) x,31 27,611 4.35 PM 19 2a: 22 ? 221 60 0 25 41 IPI D 21 '. 1 113 %I 6T) 25 3:, 4.30 PM 10 1!f )0 Ci 41 212 39 t7 31 10 ! 0 20 3 11 G 601 2S,Iu 4:45 PM 12 , J22 0 52 2,AU 41 0 ata 10 7 U 22 8 36 1167S 2612 5'00 PM 10 4 30 J25 57 0 it 6 8 a x All {} 6o) :rs o 5_ 'a PM 12 1 < ❑ 5S 212 S3 0 AM Ta 11 17 1 I :{,, Ad {} ;,!�{ 2;1x14 5.30 PM G 0 60 : Dt 44 0 ! } 11 G 0 11 :1 38 0 X9'2 2}34 S_15I'm 5 130 1-1 . : .: I ]'•Sr1 7 ]' S 7 23 ;> 5x6 2+1015 Peak 15 Min FlrtwratEs Nortf�buun�l "(mil hound vuesk4ound Total Lela Thru Right U Lett T)ru Fright U Left Thru R1 ht U Leh Thru RighL U A ue rex Heauy Trucks 78 76$ 72 0 16 0 0 7n4 4 3; 180 a n n 117 16 37 56 n a 0 48 a 36 tt;s Q a 17 7697 5a PFdeSsrianz Q D 4 4 4 Bacycles 0 ❑ 0 p n ❑ 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ G f1alJ"i ad Stopped 6LLses C. a3Yl'1117CPf is Report generated on 911212013 10:f -1 AM SCURCE= Qualityfnunts, 4LC (http;flwww•pualitycnunts•nek} 1 877 a9tJ X71.2 Page a or 1 Tyae or peak hour bclm reposed: User -Defined Method fordetarminine peak hour. Total Entering Volume LOCATION: itamehameha III Rd -- Hawaii Belt Rd QC JOB #i: 14972607 CITY/STATL Hawaii, HI DATE: Tue, Apr 30 2019 U 34 Peak -Hour_ 7:24 AM — 8:24 AM 4,7 D + + I JS 11 L6ll Peak 15 -Min: 730 AM - 7:45#M • a� a 11 -- 5a # 14 J L S A. S66 $7 r 0 .0 t {i # 62 4i7 • F� . 475 5.5 r « 5.7 716 rt 295 % t 16 rt 4S9 S.7 rt h3 1 0 ]U4 rt 57 5 * "F- �7 {S t#5 F Jam Quality Counts 7.2, &4 o s o J i 4 L -1 G -1 1 1 l) AW * ryp. L 1� -1i RA 1w NA ru 1', N1iI f Omit F'K,imd K, nc hrlrr.+•h,3 II Rd (hlrirll:;romd) Man •hn-T),,h,t II Rd (Sou.'iku)iir111) H iw m 4r:Ir Rd 1i;),IrII11 H :1•r r Rall 1 Z4 i'w":"%IkH11.rILI) [�1�1 he�urly L:b.vi Rpp : irrim.r' nlTl- lir1: TI'�•'u R'�,hk Ll Ii:FI Tf1ru Ri.til3r kJ Ic•i, Tluu Rij;l`I kJ le? -1 TI-r�r R�,h: kJ 5. 4 r.1 7: DID AId 3 41 ,l 0 } 1 2 2 D 3 1' = 3 sr 7:19 4M 3R 5 0 3 2 2 D 7:3D AM 36 t 11) 0 a 4 6 0 4 111 88 G 22 107 3 0 400 1517 7:4 I'M 9 -Dr -AM 37 5 11 $ 5 0 Q & 1 2 3 } •1 1 D 5 3 78 Fi 3 8.1 `_:S 0 25 17 9°3 (7 0 12.4 •S ej 300 3.17 1512 148.; H:15 AM li:3DAM 91 L 7 34 1 111 Iq U 'i 2 1 :s D 2 4 D 1 Y,2 61 0 2 U S� 0 u0 1 15:� 'I %) 11b 1 U :m19 379 119 i42f. Prak 1rMIri Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flvwrates Iprl Thru Righl I1 IPFk Thru Right l} 1Ffl Thru Right 0 1�Ft Thru Righl U Total A I Veh cles lt4 4 40 0 32 16 211 C1 tri 04 352 D as 428 It 0 16ciu "aay Trucks 0 0 8 0 D 0 0 32 4 24 24 tk 92 Pedestriwis 0 D z 0 4 Bicycles Railroad 0 _ 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 Sto ed BLEST$ �[+i Flf r'd YlfCS': Regartgenerated on 5113{2019' 1101 PM SOURCE. C2ualltyCounts, LLC lhttp:llwww.giAdlitycours:s.iie.1 L-2177-580-2212 Page I or 1 Tyae or peak hour being reposed: User -Defined Method fordetarminine peak hour. Total Entering Volume LOCATION: itamehameha III Rd -- Hawaii Belt Rd (IC JOB #!r 14922608 CITY/STATE: Hawaii, HI DATE: Tue, Apr 30 2019 Peak -Hour: 3:45 PM -- 4:45 PM a P6 I • t I L� L� ' II Peek 15 -Min: 4:30 PN1 -- 4:45 PM + + o tti u 11 903 w 11 ! R 11 r S`[1 27 r P aF t d r 6 571► t 254 «76 812 r MA i l fA 5"X1 cl 11 • 1.4 11 .6 2S -1 F 3D as3 Qua Li'ty Counts 17 37 DATA THATURWS CC,JM1raPMUMTI 'i 0 0 6 U J i 4 Ca 70 0 2 F 'P ; 6 rv. r NA N y t `,A 1', Mil f Omil N,imd K;;-nch;lrr.+•h.3 11W] (Nmil :;romd) K3mehn-Twh;i 11 14d Ww., m 4rIr ltd H;,w. r Rall Idri %I IH 11.rILI) [al dl HrcolulI Kpp :Ilmm;l Al lira: TL•'u ft'�h:t U tP.ft Thru RiA h'r t1 I cd Thm Rigl'.1 U l e? -1 TI-�,r R:rh: tl ly 1'41 3.1D Ph1 YS 3 14 47 10 22 0 0 4 24:; 4 6 5 - 13_ 3 k} db 9 3:30 P O 3:45 PM 65 6 21 74 4 12 0 6 '1 1 5 :r 2 2 6 0 6 1, 119 Pu '8 1" 3 119 4 0 11.1 3 4 457 431 1=J:s 4:P0 PM 4-115 PM 78 1 12 6.5 5 12. 0 0 1 6 4 0 0 3 5 40 4 1 17 134 74 0 62ri 17 i 3 I E4 7 0 136 4 {Y V 1 433 i 7`1:3 1.757 4;30' PM 1 70 1 15 0 d a 3 0 6 14 7Q 0 1 r 1.37 7 4 466 1771 4:4' PM S -OP PM 72 3 14 4.8 4 2S U :1 .2 d 4 D r+ :3 a S 5 iQ$ 123 S{7 D 9c) 0 A 2'1 ' G 3I ] sa 39a 4=:3 L F3,1 17:3; 5= 5Pm 5:30 PM 56 - 1'- 46 3 21:1 0 U ? 1 7 0 1 1 4 D 3 4 106 141 75 0 71 11 8 101 1 0 8% 0 0 3S7 -M 1 ih90 l60" 5,4'. PM 36 1 14 0 3 a 2 0 2 i1$ 41 0 9 87 1 0 :256 LL,07 Pa.>.,ik 15 -min Northbound Southbound La6ttxwElif Westb 0 Howrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 2w 4 64 4 0 4 0 16 0 12 0 0 0 0 24 0 564 12 280 D 4 64 0 548 a 0 17 0 1S64 96 Pedestriarls mr-ytles o 0 Q 0 o 0 0 4 0 a 0 0 Q 0 0 0 .. Railroad Stinpjped E3r,ses CiT71�r1'k�t7rs. Report generated on 5/13/20113 3.06 @PSA SQURCE: Quality Counts, LLC ihttp:/Iwww.qualitWounts.net) 1-977-580-22.12 Page 1 or 1 ��raffle D-11.1 service 1 : . '. . ': � , ' ' N ieow-n 01?;Sralion #: X7100111?4313 Hu�I�Pai RG�d D2 M Qweh @C38hurnanu Hwy U1 I Narli Kailua Dr hlrlrjr Efle Vx e I. ln.('7 00910037 S71DD1112038 19,63455, -155.9779 ., p091 0331 871001112038 Site l`-+? Station Description: Queen Kaahurr>:anu Hwy: Hualaia€ Road tv Nam Kadua Or tiur'[•et� F3e�ennin ] )ivei E'iu,r Sk1rv4y" 1'nilira«, Dace ['in.r: 'F lI}.'iJrN�+J iyrif:e�;? l�4UU tiu[tii•v hlinl,o„I; Roo dTnlr+: 1}aIo Tylva; Ciaat S[ur"rxL';ew_ Lot Cl 1) Skc,cl, Llpdalyd: Liz: N' ft ftcnU7rk4: 1303 FAf'1LITY'tAME T[,RI f'L''tiC 1RE`:1 RC}Li`I'E: C11ASy 1 YlIu NU. M11_E_ queen iCaahumanu Hwy E4 UElU U 1= hiriecrjnu ,n F.ncl 171: N8n3 Kaiiva br' i'a6ani ltti S R9e ).'M]) D2- 1)7fi:L'ifi{76 wo F#rein U2: Huaialai P.o3d f fti.araeh:unehs[ Ave Site l`-+? 7� L U 1 .1 11 11 Cu c4 0 CV mCL Ln IN N R 4 ; - :3 9; - T, I 14 - Ir? lo — 7co — • Y- r 1) 0: .7) .. N M LV 11 C. r- r 41j C., o' L� Sj v 11) c. c� ..-j c.i %"d c N rL iTL CC 17. 01 cq M w ko (D 7r - 7, ;� 1 -11 1,1 17, 1S -'Z �7 CL P7 — Irl -D I r.- C 'D IZ 11 1 c M 4 -4 7) co ca 'm m ul LO a op Glo- r.- G4Y3 iD -t LM M W U50 Q kn ko w n2 v) r, k, F, Q 6) v Gn LD 11 IT v v vi 'r v v) W, (n j) C, c. �o *v r-. c, LD f; w r- c,3 c, r- M rN C4 r%i I N (7v r -.1 C4 -.I C-� CN cQ r.11 CQ 7 -J 117 ;n 11 71 �1. 1. C. :,1 �I rl Lj :A 11 1:11 LL J. u-' LL ol 11 17. Z' 11 C. 1:1 lz -z '4 7 Ll 11 1 1 11 1% 1 .1 Cl 7 7 C c c� n mm LU I r?17, c •x uL a LM N Cu Wa'JI D d) --I) CL FL C;, o Z, lz o o G cl c c3 c c:; D c, LD -D is c3 N Go [[]c ] G, G G m C4 't XP kr) Z4) C t u5 ca r 23. N Do �3 cm j L c C. V) 0 r, N f - i r -c r- i r- LI Z Cl N 0 77 ' llj 7. M ID I Cp ZQ 4P w c4 17 .G d ete+ C7 cL Ln cp, L Q vl� 13 CL Lu 7: -7 ,cs l: ;e� .1 C 17 7. 17. 17 — IL7 7 7 LD c; Lo OL 17, 1 Co 0 c3 ED I Ol 1D Lrl 1r) C') ',D 0 � C+1 rc LN Cr7 [IJ fl94:4 co m cc cli P c, u3 Q m cA Cl) ra �o _j u - J in CD 4L L> C) C4 In L - - 'T -7 T 75 k!! C5 O 03 e2l W. n 121 M Cl Ln C� ¢i n — - 1�3 'I I : I .l y rl — Im . , ru -,t W w N [.1 cu M 0 < 7 < LJ Z < .0 cp c� :p p o Om C] c> 9 r- 77 7: : , , -m , , I LL - L;) m 6 D c, L� .11 - < < 't < - LL —i F- -, 7? c0 -n -N 1-3 c-4 N -n i c:4 o Lf, CL An vA -L ID N CI .71 �0 r� La Lff C� w -7 01 1 D ',�l 't - O Cli c, "d LL a im In S c, r. m 'P t. f Cl ie) '7, c tft 717 ❑ J3 w ko rl JO C, C Irl",:p Ln c P C I in rL 0: oo ID p {N'" 2fn V - i 4 coo C M & -j Q Q clF It m kn r- w c4 lo m D 2) It -t 7 -w q w -m -w -7 F� il �k, CL 0 F- EfJ Cc{''eD >c, c, C- cr) cl c ID cl cl, -0 c,J N w ;D "j U, CSS Nrd C4 �l clj 7A z%j clj `4 N N C4 .11 Z'j CN N 7 rL N 7 Lj LL c-_- C, rd .,l I . f LLij. jj Z1. 11 v- ID I- c LL �L -C z r -z 1 t '4 1 Vj 11 11 11 11 1� 11 n C c� FL (J 4. Il 1-9 1} 11 11 '7 1 It Iz, lz I D f) c c cc 11 1z, C 0 c3 C 'm D to T!ds m p r cq 0 06 ta Rn 99 L) do rti D3 ra ;3r. -k cl -4. r.7 Td Lf) 0 ..'0 C. P- 'D 0 L.) I': r-.1 rq „l co '. r.j -,j c-+ 0J ^J cl) Ill IN cl 11 CN QQ IN 114 N 1a U) LU 'R, 'bZ:l Qrp 713 Ed r cD ul 71V rr ir, L: c. LL" c- L: It c "I '!� c ­ A -, r-, v M -, -Q c.j SY T, r- r-- 7- Ic ;e� .1 1, -- -- 7 7 CL In Oj CZ ." - . : -, % Ic"1 Yc; ku, 'It q 7- 7) rC, "o c rp r.. r- v m cl 11 1., c ILI C-1 c In < cl cY g) a 'E2 ul r� cu ,, kD g, c) 0 w Ln m 4-- -4 - r14 IP M T -N .6 E rc 0 �r- LN [:7 C7 rr n u w r4 in m Nc) C, — co m r-. In mto M O00 m cc Cr) ra J 7j CD:0 t, LO m N- 0 v r0, ah r- - t- oo 4L Z5 75 - - - - - - - - 'n c, 'n CD - - I" r-- t� 1p 1�3 P� r In "ir 9 �'l l'J rr < 7 < N cQ w ru m mc- ,t - -0 flc� :p p o O O c> 2 c m L;) m 6 Ln L6 1, 6 f-. L7 c 7 7 7 LLI. Lj- Z3 <VLl -- -:!- z� , -f , : ccC4 LL -i H - -N N CJ Ti n i< 117 0 'D wD c: 6 4 - S c, c, c, 7, C' r 7 c c, Run Date: 2U 1 6'01 9 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2015 Site Ip; B71001112t138 Rraute leo: 11 date From 2015.09;10 0:40 Town; Hawaii Direction; � E,i? Date To: 211 5'e7q.11 23:45 Location. Queen KaAhUlMnu Hwy - Hualalai Rd to Nam Kailua Ear Functional Clawfication: 14 Ula13AN:PRINCIPAEI. APTErRIAL. - OTHER HEPOH I f DIALS - 46 HOURS RECGRDE8 PEAK HOUR VOLUME % NUMBER OF AXLES Cycles 263 0.49% 525 PC 4'.;':49 84.23% 90295 2A -4T 7438 13.88% 14878 LIGHT VEHICLE TOTAL,+ 52549 98,60% 105897 AADT HEAVY VEHICLES 201510911014:00 B u, 0.1694 213 SINGLE Utill TRUJK SINGLE UNIT 2A -6T 3.7 `;,:a 192 3A. -SU 161 ,l..; ''0 492 4A -SU 29 0-0b". 115 SINGLE -TRAILER TRUCKS 4A -ST 266 0.501/. 1064 5A -ST 50 0.099'. 25C 6A -ST 34 0A6% 190 MULTI -TRAILER TRUCKS 187 0.72% SA -MT 12 0,02% t;fl 6A -MT 1 0.00% 6 7A -MY 15 0.03% 105 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 748 1.449'0 2678 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 53597 (A) 100.00% 108375 (B) UNCLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 2 0.00°+0 AXLE CORRE"ON ROAADTUSE FACTOR (A+Cj l:(lptltVALE JT(BF2) 54187 (C) 0.989 Of T1lTM1] HP61S PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 tiounK-F14CT R VOLUME.: 2034 HOUR HOUR TRUCK '.OF (PE T) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUME AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 201510911014:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT 165A-1) (6SA-2) TRi3f:7CS (TYPE 4-7) 10 0,49% 187 0,72% 7459 25804 COMBINA11ON Z65E3-1) (658-2) (TYPE 8-13) 10 M49% 187 0.72% 7.85% Traffic Data Service Traffic Stition Sketch N Llsndl Hawaii Area; Kona .irrriiui ff}.+.St,.rinii +i: f371 [}[I1 1 1 c"'�` $ Hualalal Rwd U2 Queen Kaahumanu Hwy UI Nam Kajltm Dr 4lrf'r9 Dile \urtir mp boU ;I::.tx?" l3? k'iil l } r}_7s 19.53455, -155.9779 i. D0543008 tilafFcrn Desrl-iptinn: (ween Kaahulrlanu Hv%ry; Hualalai Road to Mani Kai{u3 Dr 4tcrv._1 ]Scoirriiinr I]:t+rl'1ime: kurvc]•Eizding DatrJ7inre: qi's116 (9, litltiil #N!lfa 0� 24f10 Sul•+'e)'Mt'And: Road Tube 1-i>!r.iTti}5,:: {"IFls 4aIa+•tip t.:.'u; LM t']E3 SI,"et�h lJls�l�i��•d: lsv: SR €�tnusr�� l: (rte }'.1l"Ii.CI 'NI.. I`S':•.� •,;:I':s R{7LfTF ('I NO, hitZ.E Queen iCabafumanu 1t.ey I d}E fif Fel—f]irix'1:,on In 1"curl � `d:lC :-iihri f)r' E:wi R,': �I{v:• IorIY 17J= flric.r[r�u I,i fis•"ni �_ I IJa':i; nl I;.;lj � h.. i.1 iic..l •, •;., ,.� La m GB r N r- Q r2 m M L65 m w w ill 117 Q N !V 0 N H7 1.1i Lf1 h 00 EO Liz Y] M {,7 T] r d 2 T� T+ h '� C] 111...444 ;h ea cae�mNNN[a.........r ......... �.. rrwr rr.:r UL? :L 4 - EL I. 1p 717 ffJ 1+'i N ILI Id} Ch 6 CO lf] U3 ,.7 h 111 1l7 -,ri17 M M N3 {L SU EL �y < z a 'i7 In 19 6 H ri •.. � E r LT 6 07 fitl�yy' +- C7 Qt +- r +- C40pD L L Cf Q. D. U'l 11 ` am ,��, N f0 Y n CJ 11 ,J7 LL it 7 c r _ iJ C C J L UJ r. rD N L CJ J Jh Cb 7 b t_ Li fl �' fJy -4Y1 {3 ol -� i] C,17 6 O 40 D 0 s3 O 0 d O0 d O C7 O � � A R? 1p Gi Hs to m r V Q7 CIL +' a : d• .# u', v .fir 7d �r +t 3 ca 4 } 4i O o i .. i..i ca {} C3 Q 0 4 LL a C 4 = ; r. {i1 rt _. - f'- ^ - k CJ . ,. ,; C„ r... C- ., ^! 1) ;.I r .. s_^ ILI - - - _ - ..� CL r Jy� ('tf O li7 r� ll]- S C' l 0.: iJ 4J i �]L L:: - w VA CU '9` r-: -1 C . :Il :-1 J. -i � } � � C, �T .rl C51 GV CV CLL N N N L L.J 1. [v n: SJ ;J '.. lV :'J r:\• Z _ 1: L- I- yS yy- .J ., _M ,_ .v I I _ .L i 14 -. .. LD et '" "1 L } C:' IJ J L i 'I L Lf. r :7 r els -t = C In -r c r r o 1 I I C CL 4V L LL Li _ a- - Q)O T: Jl J s J J 1 a q W CL 3 N "1' �7 C' to �fl Ifr C7 d O C7 .. r i LZ ` (1 r C J. 5y�7 S? C} N .- 'D r tP rJ�ey3 T wcli V L] O 2 7 Lwl rvr'IL ti t) , f.^ f. C„ r_ C•_'.I '\1 : f5 C.. C.• L { I V 1J -- CJ C. _+J il 1: - IRi Ir w117 EV H7 [d�'}} 10 M f iff daa O _ = C @ v p 7y L1 i m © t < Q lel rn . v Lm } C) G v- m F- w r� q -r r! Cs n,: m tlh e+f r' F. ir: +7 iA �J I C F-3 47 G r n T n D di 4 OI r r m a} LL d�J Q C3 -. .� .- - - - - - _• to Y pr 19 wc c rn6i D -- 4 6 A y 0 417 r" f ': f5 IJ'j l 4% 1 f} fr ! U7 :l U} �Q C ❑ N h O Q r- N.. r+. 1r ii7pf O OI 1. [ 1 @ 47 V 4 10 iV N G fv IC M M >A N 0 G r} �; as :L :T5 .` .`7.} r r i.. _3 � S3 is E 71 Ili M.L� a oa Lnr iv n L a L�, n u, m r r: R° 7 �m 5; 4 �' $�E P ILL. LU LU �4 ' h r m w V h iD Ru) 14 ~S h Cl *.7 il] ,ll if] IC A Id LB l^'l [7 +G ^7 r tv i4 u7G �' - T_ T f I _' 'X. T T e LLI x - { l Ir — ,- .. . - 'l7 11 C9 W7 C ;L] rh O ^ 7 L h, a, t I I _ - L .. l LL t t *r 7r G• .- f'i f. r� ,- r`i K •- n7 -S r .•- 7f C'.:•. l 4; N GV N L -1 L •I LL LL .. u .- n r. 7 i^.. '� 117 l 0 Ij} _ Lf M I1,, f f} Iry C .-I ._.1 ' � (f} UL ..� C7 � � � fy �' r - "., r; r_ r� 'n n t n' - •.+7 n Lr. r - I I_ L z m ell C2 CD rn n Ca -r m r� It Ir 113 mit 1p 65 M 471 Ids 71 7, 0 0, C;r m I- T-- c CC U It Co M ca 64 EL Cj 7 ; 40 em C, r- M CD 0 o U.) a Z Go I cn qq q C17 kr CI C- z Io I 10 :3 LL Ll -:7,. C-' cn Li I 7 7 1 7t 7, 7 L, CA - F- - , , - Cr, 'n 4m a a cf w M CL CL E A .Z m E r L'L C3 0 0 :3 CC LQ 0 C' LD 10 <f 10 7 "1 Cq c, - n u NN C9 41C, IN N N N N 12 1, 0 n] CJ n GJCl. 17 -1 71 'C' L,I N OJ 'j CIJ Ll. CL N a 2 2 T CL L Lj M- 7' E C) LU 7- 7 F- CL Cj LL W (D C 9 4 u A 4- cli m Ir 07 CT It w m pQsf rd ZIG L" 1'- 0- 1`3 tm C7) OL 0 a - n C) C7� 2M EL 0 0 0 CP ID W3 C 7 L- 0 7, 41 19 u-, M -t U -!t e:.. 7t 7 01 7� m w 7� K , :. - - - - - " & rd 7 7 7 1- 17 �.j 7 j'3 4 (R < n :L CL 13, Yl "1 m cq -11 1.2 Iw1 LL LL -6 1 LU 0 li m w CU "D w OW7 m a N r- U) m w 7 Ifl 19 CC, < a- rq > Ly _j 2, ' LL < -D n c sl 'n <D LL f', LL 7f C. N LL L, m u 7 7 kn C Lr:, -r. 0 kn Lr. c 1, 7, ;f - r) s U-) 5 otY < Run Date: 2U 7!U8'018 Hawaii Department of Transportation Highways Division Highways Planning Survey Section Vehicle Classification Data Summary 2016 Site Ip; B71001112t138 Rraute too: 11 date From; ?; i v 05'03 fl:00 Town; Hawaii Direction; l E,i? Date Tu: 2'11 c, 05 04 23:45 Location. Queen KaAhUlnanu Hwy - Hualalai Rd to Nam Kailua Ear Functional Clawfication: 14 Ula L3AN:PRINGIPAEI. APTErRIAL. - OTHER HEPOH l IOIALS - 46 HOURS RECGRDED PEAK HOUR VOLUME % NUMBE=D OF AXLES Cycles 339 0.66°% 677 PC 35845 69.91% 71592 2A -4T 14198 27.69°% 28396 LIGHT VEHICLE TOTAL,+ ----------------------------------- SC} 98,25% 1007a AADT HEAVY VEHICLES 2t116ft1314)315:00 Bus .'.i4 i ,. 585 SINGLE UNIT TRU "'K SINGLE UNIT 2A -6T 7 :i $74 3A. -SU ;45 33 435 4A -SU 31 }.1Jyo 124 SINGLE -TRAILER TRUCKS 4A -ST 153 4.301fa 612 5A -ST 95 f1.19 475 SA -ST 3T 0.06`Yp 196 MULTI -TRAILER TRUCKS 163 0.52% SA -MT 14 0,0311% 70 6A -MT 1 0X0% 6 7A -MY 33 0.06% 231 HEAVY VEHICLE TOTALS 894 1.743'0 3039 CLASSIFIED VEHICLES TOTALS 51277(A) 100.00% 103803 (0) UNCLASSIFIED VEhIGLES TOTALS 1 0Ad9'6 AXLE CORRECTION ROAOTUSE FACTOR CAM) = EQUIVALEIfJT(Br2) s 51901 (G) 0.988 Tot.. HPUR PEAK HOUR PEAK PEAK 24 HOURK-F14CT R VOLUME : 1970 HOUR HOUR TRUCK .OF (PEAKIAADT) TRUCK VOLUME VOLUUE AADT AADT (ITEM 66) 2t116ft1314)315:00 VOLUME SINGLE UNIT (65A-1) (55A-2) TRUCKS (TYPE 4.7) 33 1.68% 283 1119% 7.U4% 25800 COMBINATION (658,-1) (658-2) (TYPE 8.13) 27 1.37% 163 0.52% 7.64'x6 Appendix C Analysis Reports — Existing Conditions (2019) Tinilr-gS 2019 AM t F'c31ici111 Rd 4 CSI -coil Kact(1LWidl-1U HWY 1 , 12 2721 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M tt r M tt ' +t ' tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 71 457 218 163 678 23 243 192 109 20 321 177 Future Volume (vph; 71 457 218 163 678 23 243 192 109 20 321 177 Turn Type 'rat NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitbad Phases 4 8 2 5 Qetectc,r Phase 7 4 4 3 8 S 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 ED 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum '01 (s) 9,5 36.5 38,5 9.5 38,5 M-5 9.5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 4.2.5 Total Split (s) 10.7 38.5 38.5 14.9 42.7 42,7 15.8 51.6 51,6 10.0 42,5 42.6 Total SPI it(%) 9.3% 33.5% 33.5% 13.0"k 37.1° 37,1% 16.3% 44.9°io 44.9% 8.7% 37.2% 37.2° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 11,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies 'yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Norge Max Max None Ncne None None Nave None Act Effct Green (s) 6,2 35.1 35.1 9.3 40.6 40.6 11.6 29.7 29.7 5.6 17.1 17.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.07 0.38 0.38 0.10 0.44 0.44 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.19 6.19 vie Raba 034 0.37 0.37 0.49 0,46 0.03 0.58 4.17 0.19 0.19 9.50 0.41 Control Delay 49.2 23.6 5,1 46.3 21.91 0.1 45.2 22.8 5.4 50.2 35.3 7.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total flay 49.2 23.5 5.1 ;6.3 21.9 4.1 45,2 22.8 5,4 50-2 353 7.4 LOS D C A D C A 0 C A D D A Appicauh Delay 20 6 25.9 29.3 26.3 Approech LOS C C C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglth:115 Actuated Cycle Length:; 91,4 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe, Semi A-A-Llncoord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Signal D] lay: 25.2 Intersectlan LOIS: C Inter tion Capacity L16lization 63.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period [min) 15 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Ir,ttorsection SUn-1rna{y 2019 AM 1, Palani Rd & Queen KaahUn�anu Hwy 11:1212021 ._ arrtent EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NOL NOT MR SEL f $,OR Lane Configurations M +f r M tt r 1) ++ r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 71 457 218 163 678 23 243 192 109 20 321 177 Future Volume ;wehih) 71 457 218 163 678 23 243 192 109 20 321 177 Initial Q (0b), vetl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.04 120 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,D0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1737 1767 1737 1$41 1811 1841 18A1 1370 1856 1870 1870 1874 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 72 466 0 166 592 0 248 198 0 20 328 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.45 0.98 D.H 0,98 0,98 0.98 198 0-R 0,98 0.98 0,98 0.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Gap,vehl11 161 1537 249 1656 344 7aQ 40 500 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.46 {1.00 0.07 0,46 •4.00 0.10 4.22 0.00 0.02 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1560 3401 3554 1572 1781 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 72 466 C, 166 692 0 246 196 0 20 328 0 Grp Sat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1605 1678 1172 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1555 0 Serves -s), s 1.7 6.9 0.0 3.8 10.4 0.0 a.6 3.£ 0.0 0.9 o -D 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 1.7 6.9 0.0 3.8 10,4 0.0 5.6 16 0.0 0.9 6.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1,00 1,04 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehhih 161 1537 249 1656 344 780 40 500 VJC Ratio(X) 0.45 0.30 0.67 042 0.72 0.25 0,50 066 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 1537 445 1656 613 2108 123 1714 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,0{1 1.00 1.00 1.110 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 36.6 13.5 0.0 35.8 13.4 0.0 34.6 25.6 O.0 38.4 321 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 1.0 0.5 0.4 3.1 0.8 0.0 2.8 0.2 0,0 9.3 1.5 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 1) .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 0.7 2.5 0.0 1.6 3.8 0.0 2,4 1.5 4.0 0.5 3.0 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 38.6 14.1 0.0 38.9 14.2 0.0 37,4 26.8 0.0 47.7 33.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Appfoauh Vol, veli h 538 A 858 A 444 A 348 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 17.3 18.9 32.3 34.5 Approach LOS B B C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.3 21.9 10.3 401.9 12.5 15.7 8.5 42.7 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax), s 5.5 47,1 10.4 34.0 14.3 38.3 6.2 3@.2: Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 2.9 5.6 5.8 8,9 7.6 8,9 3.7 12.4 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.3 0.2 3.1 0.5 2.2 0.0 4.9 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 23.7 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2019 AM 2: Henry St & Queen Kaahur-laaPLI HWY 1V12.202'I -'#--- t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SETT Lane Configurations M tt r +� 0 1 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 107 359 124 52 600 467 146 337 42 362 339 Future Volume (vph) 107 359 124 52 600 467 146 337 42 362 339 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Porro Split NA Perm Split NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 l~ Permibd Phases 4 S 2 D9tectar Phase 7 4 4 3 8 a 2 2 2 6 n Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5,0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5,0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9.5 30.5 30,5 9.5 30.5 30,5 35.5 35.5 S5,5 35,5 35,5 Total Split (s) 11,0 32.2 32.2: 4.8 31,0 31.0 37.5 37.5 37,5 35.5 35,5 Total SPI it(%) 9.6°x6 282% 28.0'A 8.556 27.0% 27,0% 32.6% 32.6°1* 32.6% 30.9° 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3,5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tatar Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Notre Max Max None Ncne None None None Act Effct Green (s) 6.6 30.5 30.5 5,4 27.0 27.0 17.5 17.5 17.5 23.1 23.1 Actuated grO Ratio 0,07 0.33 D.33 0.06 0.29 0,29 0.19 4,19 0.19 0.25 0.25 vie Ratio 0,50 0.34 0.22 0.28 0.62 0.61 0.46 0.57 0.12 0.71 0,70 Control Delay 53,4 28.2 6.9 541,2 34.0 6.9 39,1 38.0 0.7 43.2 35.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total delay 53.4 28.2 6,9 50.2 34.0 6.9 39,1 38,0 0.7 43.2 35,2 LOS D C A D C A D D A D D App, cauh Deiay 28.3 23.5 35,3 37.8 Approach LOS C 0 ID 13 Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 92.5 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control TyDe: Semi Act-tlncoord Nlaximum vlc Ratio: 0.71 Intersecltan Signal Delay; 30.3 Intersection LOS- C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 68, 91A ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Split}s and Phases: 2: HenrySt & Qin Manu Hviy 07 08 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysts 2019 AM 2. Henry St & Queer! Kalahumanu Hwy 11;12.2021 I'41oamerrt EBL EBT EBR 'WOL WBT 4NBR fNBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBFT Lane Configurations M tt r tt r 1 4+ r 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 10T 359 124 52 600 467 146 337 42 362 339 124 Future Volume (vph) 107 359 124 52 600 487 146 337 42 362 339 124 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 190Ci 19(143 1900 19M 1900 19N 1960 190€1 19M 19410 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane tltil, Factcr 0,97 0.95 1.a0 9.97 0.95 1.00 Q.91 9.81 1.00 0.91 0,81 Frpb, ped;bikes 1,00 1.00 Q.99 1,00 1,00 0,99 1,44 1.Oti 0,55 1.00 1,00 Flpb, pedibikes 1.00 1.00 1,00 1100 1,90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Frt IM 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 0,97 Flt Proteccled 0.9.5 1,00 1. DO 4.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,0t} UQ 0.95 0,99 Saud, Flaw (protf 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1467 1595 3174 FR Permitted 9.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flq4 ' errr' 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1554 3348 1487 1595 3374 Peat[ -hour factor, Pit= 0.97 0_97 D.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 8.97 Adj.Flow (vph) 110 370 128 54 619 491 151 347 43 373 349 128 RTOR Reductknr (vph ) 0 0 86 0 0 336 0 0 35 0 23 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 110 370 42 54 519 145 136 392 8 283 544 0 Gonfl, Peds. (Nhr} 2 2 4 3 3 4 Confl. Bikes (R+hr) 1 HeavyVehietes.�Xgg, 13% 10°5 5% 6% 6% 3'r6 51A 3% 7% 3% 4% 51!0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Peau split NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 a 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 0,8 30.13 30.6 4.1 28.1 28.1 17.5 17.5 17.5 23.1 23.1 Effective Green, g (s) 6.6 30,61 30.6 4.1 28.1 28,1 17.5 11.5 17.5 23.1 23.1 Actuated gC Ratio 0.07 0.33 013 0,04 0,30 0.39 0-19 0,19 0,19 0,25 025 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehde Extension _�s}_ 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 34 3.0 10 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph} 219 1076 497 145 1025 466 293 627 278 394 705 v+s Ratio Prot c0.[14 0.11 0.02 eta. 18 0.09 Q011 co -'8 0.17 Vs Ratio Perm OM 0,09 0.01 v.+c Ratio 0.50 0-34 ME 9.37 0.60 0,31 0.46 0.58 0,03 0.72 0-69 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 41,8 23.7 21,7 43.3 27.8 25.1 33.7 34.5 31,0 32.1 31.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.30 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Inc'emental Delay, d2 1.8 0.9 0.3 1.6 2,6 13 1,2 1.3 0.0 6.2 2.7 Delay (s) 43.6 2.4.6 210 45.0 347,5 26,9 34.9 35.8 31,0 35.3 34,6 Le'v'el of Service D C C D C C C Q C D C Appruauh Delay `si 27.5 29,7 35.2 35.8 Approach LA'S C C L' D Intarsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 31.5 HCM 70 0 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated C be Length (s-) 03,3 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 68.9% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period (miry) 15 c Grtticat Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2019 AM I Hualalai Rd 4North) 1 c12.2n21 Irtiler.�e�.lic�rl Int'e.Ny s.v9h Movement EBL EBR NEL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gontigurations - S429 0 r B t f r Traffic Vol, vehrh 44 48 184 985 776 30 Future Vol, vehih 44 48 164 988 776 30 CeniticOng Peds. Or i1 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Cankl Sf,p Stag Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - '1'Ad Storage Length 140 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Mediar9 Starager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor g3 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 PAvint Flow 47 52 176 1059 834 32 Majed twnnr Mincf2 Majbr1 Maio, .1 Conflicting Flovu AJI 2246 835 0 0 Stage 1 835 - - - - - Stage 2 1411 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42 4.12 - - Crit cal t4dwy Stg 1 Critical 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Maneuver -46 0 738 - � - Stage 1 426 0 - - Slage 2 225 a - Platoon blocied, ''k - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver -36 - 797 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar - 3t - Stage 1 331 Stage 2 225 Appromh E5 N6 so HGM Contra Delay, s S 429 1,5 0 HCM LOS F Mhor I.ar+ Maior t#vmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBW ' BT SBR Capacity (vehh) 797 - 36 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 1221 - 1.314 - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 10.8 - S429 0 HCtwf Lane LDS B - IF A - - HCM 95th %file Q(veh) U - 5 Nctit Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Afl major value ira platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2019 AM 4: Hualalai Rd (South) 1111212021 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h movemem WBL WBR NBT NBR 3131- SBT Lane Gonrigurations j r T4 - - - Stage 2 t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 9 140 1006 15 73 748 Future Vol, vehlh 0 140 1006 15 73 748 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Yield - Yield - - None Storage Langlh 0 0 tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar 53 - - - - - Veh in Malian Slarat er # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % t7 - 0 - - 0 Peale Hour Faclor k 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 6 5 MAvinl Flow 10 151 1482 16 78 904 Mejor"ranr Minorl Majorl Majior2 ConllicGng Flovu AJI 2050 1090 0 0 1082 0 Stage 1 10 - - - - - Stage 2 950 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 J.22 - - 4.16 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.31$ - - 2.254 - Pol CW1 Mammar 61 262 T - 630 - Stage 1 322 - - Slage 2 372 - _ - - Platoon bluGied,'k - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 51 262 - 634 - tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar 53 - - - - - Stage 1 321 Slage 2 32,8 Appfoach m N6 so HGM Control Delay, s 38.9 4 1 HCM LOS E mhor Urfa major MMlvmt N8T NSR)N8Ln1WbLna2 88L SBT Capacity (veWh) - 53 262 6 57 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - 0.153 0.: 6 V. 25 - MGM Control Delay (sj - - 87.5 M.8 11,5 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F F E - HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 4.6 3.3 0.4 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 8 Timings 2018 AM 5; PuapLtaarlLll St 1111 7J2021 f- t 1 . II i Large Group WBL I/VS9 NEST NBR SEL SBT Lane Configurations I r t T Traffic Volume (vph) 67 185 8;.t3 24 43 718 Future Vol ume,wph) 87 '185 84q 24 43 718 Turn Type PFot Perm NA Perm Prat NA Protecled Phases 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 2 Detectad Phase 8 8 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimums Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 225 9.5 22.5 Total Split (5) 22.5 22.5 76.5 7&5 11.0 87.5 Total SPI it(%) 20.5% 20.5% 89.5% 69.5% 10.0° 79.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 7.0 1,0 1,0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead,tag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Gptrnlze? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Norre None Max Max None Max Act Effct Green (8) 10.8 10.8 78.3 78,3 6.3 84.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.10 0.10 D.75 0.75 0,06 0.81 vie Raba 0.51 0.58 0,58 4.02 0,43 0.52 Control Delay 53.6 19.4 11.2 2.2 60.4 5.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17,0 6.0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 53.6 13,4 11,2 2.2 66,.4 5.1 LOS D B B A E A App, cauh Delay 26.3 10.9 8,2 Approach LOS C B A Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 101.7 Natural Cycle: 80 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncor,,d Maximum vac Rano: 0.66 Intersectlan Signal Celay; 112.0 Intersection LOS. B Inter con C achy utilizalion 518% ICU Level of Service 8 Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases. 5: Pua aanui 5t 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page* 9 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 AM 5; Puapl_laanui St 11112f2021 VVBL IBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations I r + B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s + Traffic Volume (vehfh) BT 185 853 24 43 718 Future Volume ;wehih) 87 185 853 24 43 718 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 9 a 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.00 1,90 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.!}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Nc. No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1856 1870 1070 1820 Adj Eloy Rake,. vehlh 93 0 07 0 46 764 Peak Hour Factor 0.94. 0.94 G.N 0,91 0,94 9.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 3 2 2 a Cap, vehlh 120 1409 65 1536 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.90 0.76 0.00 0,04 X7.84 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1585 1656 1585 1781 1826 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 53 0 907 0 46 764 Grp Bat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1585 1856 1585 1751 1826 Q Serves -s), s 5.1 0.0 2217 t7.0 2.5 11.3 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 5.1 0.0 22.7 0.0 2.5 11.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.90 1.00 1,40 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh ih 120 14N 65 1536 VJC Ratio(X) 0.78 HA 4.71: 0.50 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 325 1409 117 15365 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1,00 1.00 1.0{1 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.04 4.00 1.90 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 45.3 0.0 5-6 0-0 47.0 2.1 hor Delay (d2). slveh 10.2 0.0 2.3 4.0 13.4 1.2 In!r al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehfln 2.6 0.0 7.5 0.0 1.4 2.4 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 55.4 0.9 7.9 4.i) 60.4 3.3 LnGrp LOS F A E A Appfoauh Val, Yell h 93 A 907 A 810 Approach Delay, s.,veh 55.4 7.9 6.5 Approach LOS E A A Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 79.4 87.5 11.1 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 65 72«0 83.4 %D Max Q Clear Time (9_c+11), s 4.5 24.7 13.3 7.1 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 9.3 7.0 0.1 tntefseciion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 9.7 HChA 6th LOS A N otes Unsignaiized De"6Y fn? [[,BP: t';BF :; exduded fr,:yn calculations of the app'°craJ' delay and intersection delay, 5,00 Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2019 AM 6, Kuakini Strect 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht 11"09Y s.veh 7.7 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions $1035A a r C t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 7 169 517 801 733 61 Future Vol, vehlh 7 169 517 601 733 fit CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 a Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channeiized - Free - Nene - Ykk Storage Lenglh 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stuager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 4 2 5 5 7 PAvint Flow 6 182 556 861 788 66 MajorUra Mincx2 Majorl MajW Conflicting Flovu AJI 2701 781 0 - 0 Stage 1 788 _ _ - Stage 2 1973 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 4.12 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Maneuver 22 a 531 - � - Stage 1 448 0 - - Slage 2 118 a Platoon bluGied,'k - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -7 - 891 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar -7- Stage 1 148 Slage 2 118 Approach U N8 a� HGM Control Delay, $1035.4 6.9 0 HCM LOS F MinorLanierMabr Mvml NBL NBT EBLra1 EBLQ 5BT SBR Capacity (vehh) 831 - 7 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0.669 - 1.075 - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) lie $1035A a HGNI Lane LDS C - F A - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 5.3 - 1.7 Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity $; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWcifl Not Defined `. Afl major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Timings 2019 AM T; Lako Street 11112.202'1 Large Group EBIL EBT VML 'WBT NBL NBT NBR SEL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians I 1� 1i T4 + t r Traffic Volume (vph) 251 48 59 36 33 792 55 141 647 125 Future Volume (vph) 251 48 fig 36 33 7ta2 55 141 647 125 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 5 6 fJetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 w 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,0' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 225 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9,5 54.1 54.1 1U 55.5 55.5 Total SPI it(%) 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 8,6°/3 49.29 49.2% 9.9% 515% 50.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 I'D 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Gptirnlze? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None Nave None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Careen (s) 17.7 1 T.7 16.0 15.0 53.7 49.7 49.7 58.8 55.1 55.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.51 0.47 0.47 0.55 0.52 0.52 rile Ratio 0.91 0.38 a3O 0.88 0;13 0.97 0.08 0.90 0.72 0.15 Control Delay 79.4 26.8 44.1 46.0 12.6 54.4 0.8 72.7 27.6 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 t].0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 79.4 28.8 44,1 48,0 12.6 54.4 Q.8 72.7 27,6 3.6 LOS E C D C E a A E C A App, cauh Letay 62.7 45.7 49.4 31,3 Approach LOS E D D C Intersedan Summa Cycle Lenglih:114 Actuated Cycle Length; 106.8 Natural Cyde: 110 Control TyDe: Semi Arl-Unooard Nlaximurn, We Rata: 0.97 Inteisectian Signal delay: 44.3 Intersection LOS. Q Intersection Capacity Utilization 96, A ILLI Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Pagh 13 HCM kith Signalized Intersection SurTimary 2019 AM T; Lako Street 11112.202'1 --. 11e- • ,� NbVement EBI_ EBT M WBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T V t r T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 251 48 59 69 36 267 33 742 55 141 647 125 Future Volume ;vehih) 251 48 69 69 36 267 33 792 55 141 61147 125 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 U 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.Go 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1.110 1.40 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1874 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1070 1449 18? 1 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 267 51 0 73 38 0 35 B43 4 150 6B8 G Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 0.94 8,94 0!94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Gap,vehl11 303 318 110 116 344 971 258 1016 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.17 0.00 9,06 0.06 •0.110 0.03 0.52 UOQ Q.05 0,55 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 17B1 1870 0 1767 3870 0 1781 1870 156110 1725 1856 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 267 51 G 73 38 0 35 843 0 150 668 0 Grp Sat F1cvv(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 4 1767 1874 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 1585 0 Serves -s), s 10 2.2 Q.a 3:9 1.9 4.0 0.9 373 0.0 3,8 2515 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 14.0 2.2 0.0 3.9 1.9 0.0 0.9 37.7 0,0 3,8 25.5 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 d.DG 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.DO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehih 343 318 110 115 344 971 258 1016 VJC Ratio(X) 0.88 0.18 J,66 0.33 0,10 0.87 6,58 0.68 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 336 353 333 353 881 971 270 1016 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.40 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 38.7 33.8 0_0 43.8 42.9 0.0 112.7 26.1 0'c 19.0 15,5 0,0 hor Delay (d2). s7veh 21.5 0.2 4,0 6.7 1.6 0.0 11.1 10.4 0.0 2.9 3.6 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 7.8 1.0 0,0 1,9 0.9 0.0 D.3 17.9 0.0 1.7 11.0 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 60,2 34.1 0.0 50.5 44.5 0.0 12.8 30.4 0.0 21.9 19.2 11.0 LnGrp LOS E C D D B C C B Approauh Vol, veil h 318 A 111 A 878 A 838 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 56.0 48.4 29.7 19.6 Approach LOS E D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 5 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.2 54.1 24.7 7.5 56.8 10.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.4 49,6 18.0 5.0 51.4 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.8 39.7 16.0 2.9 27.5 5.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 4.4 0,2 0,0 5.1 0.2 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 3C1.L HChA 6th LOS C; N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- arse;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Phgh 15 Timings 2018 AM 8, Kamehamehe III Read & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 11112!2021 r t 4 Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NBT 8BL ajj Lane Configuratians 4 r 414 T4 }i* Traffic Volume (vph) 5 26 12 76 475 14 417 Future Volume (vph) 5 26 12 Ifs 475 14 417 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot HA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permitlad Phases 2 D9tectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 311.0 30.0 30.0 9.5 23,5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (8) 30.4 30.4 30.G 13.6 40.0 9.6 36.0 Total SPI rt(%) 27.6% 27.6% 27.3% 12.4% 36.4° 6.79 32.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 Ad! -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 110 1.0 1.0 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes 'des Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Nave Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 13.5 13.5 7.1 8.3 45.0 5.2 36,2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.D9 0.11 0.59 0.07 0.48 vie Ratio 13.57 0.08 a27 0.46 0,50 0.17 0.48 Control Delay 37.2 0.5 30.1) 43.8 15.3 40.8 14.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.2 4.5 30.4 4`?.8 1u.3 44.8 14.8 LOS D A C D B FD B App, cauh De!ay .32.1 30,0 19,1 15.d Approeah LOS C C 8 B Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglth: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 76.2 Natural Cycle: 105 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum vac RatGo: 0.57 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay: 19.3 Intersection LOS. B Intersedon Capaci#y Utiil zatiop 57.Wk ICU Level of Service 8 Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: U. Kamenarneha lII Koaa & {ween fS Munnanu HW t t iVas3 7 Q r 07 1 t08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srtn-ima{y 2019 AM 8; Kamehameha III Read & (ween IKaahumanu Hwy 11+12-2421 --*� 'f(' --- 41 -01 I'4layament EBI EBT EBR WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r :k I +T Traffic Volume (vehfh) 15T 5 26 16 12 15 76 47w 15 14 417 285 Future Volume ;vehih) 157 5 25 16 12 15 76 475 15 14 417 285 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.04 0.95 1-40 0,95 1.40 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1.D0 1,00 1.44 1.00 1.40 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1811 1870 1722. 1874 1781 1796 1737 1811 1870 1870 1811 1811 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 169 5 D 17 13 16 82 511 1G 15 448 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 4.93 OX 8.93 0,93 0,83 0.93 0.93 0,93 0.93 0,93 D.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 2 12 2 8 7 11 6 2 2 6 6 Gap,vehl11 230 7 26 20 24 103 933 29 32 1689 Arrive On Gruen 0.13 0.13 {1.00 0,04 0.04 0.04 0.06 0.53 0.53 G-02 0,40 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1732 51 1459 598 457 563 1654 1745 55 1781 3532 0 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 174 0 D 46 0 D 82 0 527 15 448 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1784 0 1459 1618 0 0 1654 0 1804 1781 1721 0 Q Serve{s,�s}, s 13.2 0.0 0.0 1.9 G.4 4.0 3.2 0.0 12.8 O.F 5.1 17.4 Cycle fD dear(g_c), 5 62 0.0 0.0 1.9 0,0 0.0 3.2 0.0 12.6 0.6 5,11 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.00 0.37 0.35 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.04 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 237 0 74 0 0 403 D 962 32 1009 VJC Ratio(X) 0.73 0,40 0.66 0.00 0.00 0,80 0.00 0.55 0,46 0.17 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 6% 0 622 0 0 227 D 962 137 1689 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,x 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,04 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.r➢0 Uniform Delay (d), slueh .277 0.0 0_0 31.3 0.0 4.0 307 4.0 117.2 32.3 91 0.D her Delay (d2). slveh 4.4 0.0 0.0 10.2 0.0 0.0 13.0 b.0 2.2 9.9 0.4 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirtDftD(54°l9),vehfln 2.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.6 0,0 43 0.3 1.6 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 32.0 0.0 0.0 41.4 0.0 0.0 43.7 0.4 12.4 42.2 10.3 10 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A 6 D B Appfcauh Vol, veil h 174 A 46 609 463 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 32.4 41.4 16.6 11.3 Approach LOS C D 5 B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.3 8.6 37.1 7.4 5.7 40.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 25.9 9.1 3115 25.5 5.1 35.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 8.2 5.2 7.1 3 9 2.6 14.8 Green Ext Tome (p ), s 0.8 0.0 2.7 4.2 0.0 310 fntefsecllan Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 17.? HCl`A 6th LOS B N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBRI is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,pfoach delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 Tin7ir(lS t02 ■ o 3 -W04 05 06 � 07 X39 2019 PM t F'c31laiii Rd & QI,coii KaL-ihUn�ai-iu Hvvy 1 , If 7721 { Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL 'vVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians �1 tt r t� r 1� ++ r '� +t r Traffic Volume (vph) X0 677 503 223 609 41 227 283 247 51 313 107 Future Volume (vph; 211;4 677 503 223 609 41 227 283 247 51 313 107 Turn Type ;'Tct NA Perm. Prot NA Perm ?rot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 5 Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum '01 (s) 9,5 38.5 38.5 9,5 38,5 38.5 9.,5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 44.5 40,5 15,0 38.5 38,5 15,0 48.1 46,1 13.4 44,5 44.5 Total SPI it(%) 14.8"Io 35.2° 35.2% 13.0% 33.5% 33.5% 13.0% 40.1'% 411% 11.7% 38.7% 38.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max Nave Ncne None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 11.4 38.5 36.5 10.1 35.1 35.1 10.2 24.13 24.0 7.6 15.8 16.8 Actuated grC Ratio 0,12 4.40 0.40 0,11 0.38 0,38 0.11 0.26 0.2E LI.08 0.18 0.18 role Ratio 0.62 0.64 0,60 0.64 0.47 0.05 0.62 0.31 0,42 0.36 17.49 0.29 Control Delay 46.8 26.8 9.6 48,2 24.7 0.2 48,8 29.1 fi.ar 45.7 35.5 7.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 4.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total delay 46.8 26.6 9,6 45.2 24.7 0,2 48.5 29.1 6.0 45.7 35,5 7,8 LOS D C A D C A U C A D 0 A App, cauh Letay 24.7 29.5 27.4 30.7 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglth:115 Actuated Cycle Length:; 91,7 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum u c Rato: 0.64 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 27.1 Intersectlan LOS: C Intemdon Capacity Utilization ss e% ICU Level of Smvice C Analysis Period (min) 15 Salus and Phases: 1: Palani Rd 8 Queen Kaahunnariu E'wu 11,601 t02 ■ o 3 -W04 05 06 � 07 X39 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection SUn-1rna{y 2019 PM 1, Palani Rd & Queen KaahUn�anu Hwy 1 c12.2021 I'4layarnerrt EBL EBT ESR wBL WBT 4NBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt r t� r 1) ft tt r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 2cla 877 503 223 609 41 227 283 247 51 313 107 Future Volume ,vehih) 2K STI 5G3 223 889 41 227 283 247 51 313 107 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 Q 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0c 1,00 1.Go 1.00 1,60 1.90 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.i}U 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na Na No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1855 1856 1570 1870 1841 1,870 18555 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 265 895 D 228 C21 0 232 289 0 52 319 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.96 4.98 0,98 0,99 196 O.98 0,98 0.98 0,36 0,96 Percent Meavy Veh, % 3 3 2 i 4 2 3 2 P 2 2 C Gap, vehlh 357 1578 316 1521 319 691 76 512 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.45 {1.00 0.09 0,43 •0.00 0.09 0.19 100 0.04 -D.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3428 3526 1595 3456 3497 1585 3426 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,.vehfh 265 895 0 228 b2t 0 232 288 0 52 319 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1714 1763 1565 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 15a5 1781 1777 1585 Q Serves -s), s b-0 15.1 0.D 5.7 ".8 0.0 5.3 5.7 6,1) 2.3 5.8 0_0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 6,0 15.1 0,0 5,2 9,8 0.0 5.3 5.7 0.0 2.3 6.8 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 357 1576 316 1521 319 691 76 512 VJC Ratio(X) 0.74 0,57 0,72 041 0,73 0.42 0.68 0 62 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 533 1578 451 1521 448 1538 197 1767 1-10M Platoon Ratic 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.40 0.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 (1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 35.0 16.5 0.0 35.5 15.6 0.0 35.5 28.4 0,L' 38.0 32.4 0,0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 3.1 1.5 0.0 3.2 0.8 0.0 3.6 0.4 0,0 10.3 1.2 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 2.6 5.9 0.0 2.2 32 0.0 2.3 2:4 0.0 1.2 2.9 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 38.0 17.9 0.0 38.8 16.4 0.0 3.4.1 28.8 0.0 48.3 33.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Apprcauh Val, vett h 1160 A 849 A 521 A 371 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 22.5 22.4 33.4 35.7 Approach LOS C C C D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 20.2 11.6 401,5 12.0 16.1 12.9 39.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax), s 8.9 41.6 10.! X8.0 10.5 40.0 12.5 34.0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 4.3 7.7 7.2 17,1 7.3 8.8 8,0 11.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 2.0 0.2 6.0 0.2 2.2 0.4 4.2 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 21=.1 HChA 6th LOS C; N otes UnsignaiiZed N716y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bras.,;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2019 PM 2: Henry St & Our -,en KaahuralartLI HWY 11112.2021 -' 9 t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL SK Lane Configuratians �1 tt r M +'t r 4+ r 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 663 291 72 548 314 126 318 34 340 342 Future Volume (vph) 190 663 291 72 548 314 126 318 34 348 342 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm $OR NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2. Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 a a 2 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9.5 30.5 30,5 9.5 30.5 30,5 35.5 35.5 35,5 35.5 35,5 Total Split (s) 13,0 34.0 34.0 9 5 30,5 30,5 36.0 36.0 35,0 35.5 35.5 Total SPI it(%) 11.3% 29.6% 29,6% 8.3% 26.5% 26.59 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 30.9% 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3,5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 LeadLag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None None Nano Act Eflet Green (s) 8.6 32.3 32.3 6.1 26.5 26.5 16.9 16.9 1&9 24.4 24.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0,09 0.34 D.34 0,05 0,28 0,28 0.18 0,18 0.18 0.26 0.26 vie Ratio 0,64 0.56 0.44 0,40 0;56 0.48 0.41 0.56 0.110 0.73 9.69 Control Delay 55,1 31.0 5.6 54,3 34.4 6.7 39,5 39.4 0.5 44.0 33.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 07 0 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55,1 31.0 5. C, 54,3 34.4 6,7 39,5 39.4 9,6 44.0 33.0 LOS E C A D C A 0 D A D C App, cauh Letay 28.6 26.6 36.6 36.7 Approe5h LOS C C 1) Q Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 94.6 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control TyDe: Semi A,c#-Uncoord Nlaximum vlc Ratio: 0.73 Inteiseclion Signal Delay; 31.2 Intersectlan LOS- C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 12.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: HenrySt & ween Kaallumanu Hwy t f'D3 07 08 5.00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2019 PM 2. Henry St & Queer! Kalahumanu Hwy 1111212021 -, ---W *� t Moamerrt EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT W5R NBL NBT IBR SBL ABT SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt r M +t r 1 4+ 04 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 663 299 72 548 314 126 a18 34 348 342. 190 Future Volume (vph) 190 663 291 72 548 314 126 318 34 348 342 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 1904 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1804 1900 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lana tail. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frpb, pedlblkes 1.00 1.00 1,40 1,00 1.00 0.99 1.44 1.00 0,98 1.00 -199 Flpb, pedfbikes 1 #30 1.00 1,04 1100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1,00 1.0 Frt 1.047 1.00 0.95 1.00 1,1017 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.95 Flt Proteded 4.9.5 1,00 1. DO 4.95 1.00 1,04 0.95 1,00 1.G0 0.95 1,40 Said, Flaw (protf 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1510 3193 FR Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Setd, Flow (Derrl1f 3335 3539 15$3 3433 3471 1561 1.595 3382 1537 1517 3193 Peal[ -hour IaCtor, U'H'F 0.98 0.98 D.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 0.98 198 0.98 0.9a 0.98 Adj. Flow(vph) 1R4 577 297 73 559 320 129 324 35 355 349 144 RTOR Reductknr (vph) 0 0 197 0 0 228 0 G 29 0 47 0 Lane Group Flow 4vphl 194 i77 100 73 559 92 116 337 6 30? 549 0 Gonfl, Peds. (Nhr} 1 1 4 7 7 4 Confl. Bikes (A'hr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 4°c! 5% 21% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3°rm 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prat NA Perry Prc1 NA Penn split NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 n Pgrmitled Phases 4 a 2 Actuated Green, G (s} S.8 32.3 32.3 3.9 27.6 27.8 16.9 16.9 16.9 24.4 24.4 Effective Green, g fsj 8.6 323 32.3 3.9 27,6 27.6 15.9 ifi.9 16.9 24.4 24.4 Actuated g C natio 0!09 0.34 0.34 0,04 0„29 0!29 4.18 0.18 0118 0126 026 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehde Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 14 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 300 1196 535 1110 1003 451 282 598 271 4,1 815 v+s Ratio Prot c0.06 c43.19 0.02 0.16 0.07 COAG c0.19 0.17 Vs Ratio Perm ME 0.06 0,00 v.'c Ratio 0.65 0,57 0,10 4:52 0.56 0,21 4:41 0. 0,02 0.73 0-87 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 42.0 2.5.9 22,3 44.9 28.8 25.7 34.9 35.9 32,5 32.6 32.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.40 1M 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.Cr0 1.00 1.410 Inc'ernental Delay, d2 4.7 1.9 0.8 3.;a 2.2 1.0 1.0 1.2 O'C- 6.7 2.2 Delay (s) 467 27.8 23,1 48A 31,0 26.7 35.9 37.1 32,5 39.3 34,2 Le'v'el of Service D C C D C C D D C 0 C Appfuach Delay (sj 29.8 30.'9 36.5 35.9 Approach LA'S C C L' D tntatsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 32.6 HCM 24300 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 4.65 Actuated Cycle Length (s-) 95.5 Sum of lost tirna IN 16,0 Intamecflon Capacity Utiliaatim 72.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period train) 15 c CrOical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2019 PM I Hualalai Rd 4North) 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht FlyY s.veh 1 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions ' r Conflicting Flovu PJI t t r Traffic Vol, vehrh 14 70 84 923 1005 17 Future Vol, vehlh U 70 84 923 100,E 17 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 4 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Cankl Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - YWd Storage Lcngih 144 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 4 - - 0 4 - Grade. % fl - - 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor S7 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 MAvint Flow 14 72 87 952 1036 18 MajorUra Minod h18]6r1 Maio, Conflicting Flovu PJI 21fi2 1036 0 - 0 Stage 1 1036 - - - - - Stage 2 1128 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.618 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Maneuver 52 0 671 - - Stage 1 342 0 - - 5lage 2 314 a Platoon blocied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 45 - 671 - - - tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar 45 - - Stage 1 298 Stage 2 310 Approach m NO HGM Control Delay, s 107.3 0.9 U HCM LOS F Minor UrWmajor MMl,Smnf NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 671 - 45 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 5.129 - 0.229 - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 11,2 - 107.3 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F it - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) DA - 0.8 - - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2019 PM 4: Hualalai Rd (South) 1111212021 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h movemem 1.7 Y4'BL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT LdnC- Goniigurations Stage 1 r T - - - Stage 2 t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 14 71 040 4 51 1015 Future Vol, vehih 14 1 940 4 61 1015 ConiticOng Peds, Or 11 ii 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Sfop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized Ykeid - 'YiERd - Dane Storage Langlh t7 0 - - 0 - Veh in Median Stm Ger # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peale Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 MAvinl Flow 14 73 969 4 63 1046 Major"Oa Minorl Majorl Major Conllicbng Flovu PJI 2143 971 0 0 959 0 Stage 1 971 - - - - - Stage 2 1172 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.47 6.22 - - 4.18 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.47 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.47 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 3.318 - - 2.272 - Pol Cap -1 Mammar 52 307 - - 688 - Stage 1 38o - - Slage 2 288 Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 47 307 - - 688 - ttrlav Cop -2 Maneuvar 47 - - Stage 1 360 Stage 2 262 Approach W5 NO SB HGM Control Delay, s 35.6 0 0.6 HCM LOS E mhor LarWmajor MMlvmt Nf3T NBRWBLn11BLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (vehh) - - 47 307 688 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - 0.307 0.238 0.091 - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 112.5 20.4 10,8 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F C B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1.1 0.9 0.3 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Timings 2018 PM 5; PuapLIaarlLli St 11112f2021 f- t 1 . II i Large Group WBL I/V59 NEST NBR SEL SBT Lane Configurations I i1 t T Traffic Volume (vph) 34 107 825 48 132 906 Future Volume (vph) 34 107 925 48 132 906 Turn Type Prot Berm NA Perm Prat NA Protecled Phases 8 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 8 2 Detectad Phase 8 6 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,0' 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimums Split ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 .225 9.5 22.5 Total Split (5) 22.5 22.5 09,5 69.a 18,0 87.5 Total SPI it(%) 20.5% 20.5% 63.2% 63.2% 16.4° 79.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tirt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Gptrnlze? Yes Yat Yes Recall Mode None Norte Max Max None Max Act Effut Green (s) 7.7 7.7 69.0 69.0 11.9 85.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.08 4.08 0.68 0.68 0.12 0.84 vie Ratio 0.26 0.50 0.68 0.05 H6 0.60 Control Delay 48.0 17.0 14.4 2.2 58.1 4.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 Total De12y 48.0 17,0 14,4 2.2 58.1 4,9 LOS D B B A E A App, cauh Letay 24.5 13.88 11.7 Approach LOS C B B Intersection Summary Cycle Lenpth:114 Actuated Cyde Length. 142;2 Natural Cycle: 80 Control Tyre: Semi A-A-Jr-,cooA Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0.63 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay. 93.4 Intersection LOS. B Intemdon Capacity UUlizaation 66,21, ILLI Level of Serui;:e C Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page* 9 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 PM 5; Puaptlaanui St 11112f2021 i" ' VVBL WER NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations I r f B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s + Traffic Volume (vehfh) 34 107 825 48 132 9N Future Volume ;wehih) 34 107 825 48 132 905 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 a 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bars. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1, a0 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Nc. No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1826 1856 1841 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 35 0 851 0 136 934 Peak Hour Factor €,1.47 0.97 0.37 0,97 0,07 0,97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 5 3 4 2 2 Cap, vehlh 57 1356 168 1634 Arrive On Green 0.03 0.00 {1.73 9,00 0.09 •0.37 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1547 16% 1560 1781 1870 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 35 0 851 0 136 934 Grp Bat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1547 1856 ISM 1751 19701 0 Serves -s), s f.8 0.0 21.F, t7 a 7.1 11.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 1.8 0.0 21.6 0.0 7,1 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Laiie Grp Cap(c}, veWh 57 1356 168 1634 VJC Ratio(X) 0.62 0.53 4.61 0.57 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 337 1358 251 1634 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 4.00 1.90 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), duet 45.4 0.0 6.3 0.0 42.2 1.5 hor Delay (d2). slveh 10.5 0.0 2.2 0.0 11.0 1.0 In!r al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.4 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirO}ft3(50°l9),vehfln 1.01 0.0 7.4 0.0 3.6 1.5 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),siveh 56.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 53.1 3.0 LnGrp LOS E A D A Appfoauh Val, veb!h 35 A 851 A 1070 Approach Delay, s.,veh 56.0 8.5 0.4 Approach LOS E A A Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.5 74.0 87.5 7.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 13.5 65.10 830 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 9.1 216 14.0 3.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 8.1 10.2 O.0 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 4.f3 HChA 6th LOS A N otes Unsignaiized De"6Y fn? [[,BP: t';BF :; exduded fr,uyn calculations of the app'°craJ' delay and intersection delay, 5,00 Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 H M6thTW C 2019 PM 6, Kuakini Street 1 U12.202'I Irbtmdon Int DelFy. siveh movement 2.8 ML EBR N13L NST 89T SW Ldnc- Cr)nligurations - - - r 1367 t t r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 13 372 243 854 887 36 Future Vol, vehlh 13 372 243 B54 887 36 ConiticOng Peds, Or 4 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - None - YWd Storage Langlh 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Starager # 0 - - 4 0 - Grade, % C - - 0 4 - Peaak Hour Faclar 98 96 98 98 98 98 Heavy Veh?cies, % 5 2 2 3 2 6 MAvint Flow 13 380 248 871 905 37 Major"Oa Miner2 Majorl Major Conflicting Flovu PJI 2272 905 r - 0 Stage 1 945 - - - Stage 2 1367 - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.48 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.48 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.48 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 - 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Mmmver 43 0 752 Stage 1 385 0 - - 5lage 2 234 0 - Platoon blocied, % - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 29 - 752 - - - tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar 2D - Stage 1 258 Stage 2 230 _ Approach Es NIS SB HGM Control Delay, s 20 .2 2.7 4 HCM LOS F mhor Urie major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLnl EBW 'SST SBR Capacity (veWh) 752 - 29 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0.33 - 0.457 - - - MGM Control Delay (s) 12.1 - 208.2 0 HCtwf Lane LDS B - F it - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) 1.4 - 1.5 - - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Pagh 12 Timings 2019 PM T; Lako Street 11:12.2021 'r Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 1-1� T4 + T Traffic Volume (vph) 12T 30 52 39 37 754 64 101 877 170 Future Volume (vph) 127 3D fit 39 37 754 54 181 877 170 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pl NA Perm pm-�pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 4 0 a 5 2 1 6 Permitbad Phases 2 2 5 6 L7etecttx Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 52.2 52.2 12.8 55.5 55.5 Total SPI it(%) 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 8k% 47.5% 47.5% 11.61% 50.5% 50.5%, Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnlze? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Nave None Max Max None Max Max Act Eff.t Green (8) 12.5 12.5 101 10,2 53.0 48.0 48.0 611.2 05.4 55.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.55 0.49 0.49 0.62 0.57 0,57 vie Rarbo 059 0.31 0.35 0.72 022 0.05 4.08 0.75 0.86 0.18 Control Delay 51.9 21.8 46.1 23.5 12.4 34.9 1.5 31.2 31.2 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 07 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.4 0.0 L,0 Total Delay 51.9 21.$ 46,1 23.5 12.4 34.9 1.5 31,2 81,2 5.3 LOS D C D C B C A C C A Appicauh Letay 40.4 28.3 31.4 27.6 Approeeh LOS D C C C Intersedan Summa Cycle Lenglih:114 Actuated Cycle Length; 97.2 Natural Cyde: 110 Control TyDe, Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: 0,86 Intersection Signal Delay: 30.0 Intersectlan LOIS: C Inter tion Capacity U6iization, 86,3" ILLI Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Pagh 13 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 PM T; Lako Strut 11112-2021 ---w '---•41 I'4layament EBS. EBT EER WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 14 T V t I T � Traffic Volume (vehfh) 12T 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 64 181 877 170 Future Volume ;vehlh) 127 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 64 181 877 170 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uo 1.00 1,00, 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.a0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1541 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1856 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 132 31 0 65 41 0 39 7B5 0 189 914 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0,�6 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,90 D.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 i 5 5 3 ? 2 3 2 2 Gap,vehl11 173 184 102 104 277 1050 373 1119 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.00 0,06 0.06 9A0 0.04 x].57 O.00 0.07 0,60 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1555 1767" 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 132 31 G 65 41 D 39 785 0 189 914 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 188& 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serves -s), s 6.3 1.3 p.0 3.0 1.8 0.0 0.8 27.2 0.0 3.7 32.8 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 6.3 1.3 0.0 3.0 1,8 0.0 0.8 27.2 0.0 3.7 32.5 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veNb 173 184 102 104 277 1050 373 1119 VJC Ratio(X) 0.76 0.17 0.64 0.39 0,14 0.75 0,51 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 370 395 376 38S 316 105D 426 1119 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,0{1 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 373 35.2 0_0 39.4 38.8 0.0 12.6 13.9 f7,L' 12.4 115 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 6.9 0.4 0.0 6.6 2.4 0.0 [l.2 0 0,0 1.1 6.7 U In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacictDftn(54°l9),vehfln 3.0 0.6 0.0 1.5 0.9 0.0 D.3 11.5 0.0 1.3 13,9 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 44.3 35.7 0.0 45.9 41.2 0.0 12.8 18.8 0.0 13.5 20.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D B B B C Appfcauh Vol, veb!h 153 A 106 A 524 A 1103 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 42.7 41.1 18.5 19.0 Approach LOS D CD B B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 5 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 52.7 12.9 7.5 55.0 9.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8.3 47,7 18.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.7 29.2 8.3 2.8 34.8 5.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,1 5.6 0.3 0.0 6.6 0.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 21,B HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Phgh 15 Timings 2018 PIVI 8, Kamehameha III Road & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 11112f2021 4N t 4 Large Group EBT EER WBT N'BL NBT SBL S6T , Lane Configuratians 4 r 4:� 1 T +1� Traffic Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 495 13 511 Future Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 495 17 511 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permibd Phases 2 Qetectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 95 23.3 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.4 30.4 30.G 11.6 40.0 9.6 38.0 Total SPI it(%) 27.6% 27.6% 27.3% 10.5% 36,4% 5.79 34.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.f1 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,6 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Ncne None Max None Max Act Eff.t Green (s) 19.4 19.4 6.8 TO 411.7 5.3 35.3 Actuated grO Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.G9 0.09 0.51 0.07 0.45 vie Raba 0.74 0.12 0.Z3 0.43 0,56 0.15 4.54 Control Delay 39.9 1.4 25.2 48.3 20.7 44.1 18.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 O,G D 0 0.0 0.0 D.0 Total aolay 39,9 1.4 26.2 48,3 20.7 44,1 18.7 LOS ID A C D C D 8 App, cauh De!ay 34.2 28.2 23.8 19.3 Approeah LOS C C C B Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglth: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 79.2 Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type; Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum u c RatGo: 0.74 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay: 23.9 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion C acity U61ization 65.4% ILLI Level of SeNcc C Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: U. Kamenarneha lII Koaa & Uueen Kaahumanu '10107 1 t08 5:00 pm Baseline Syrnchre 10 Reporl Page 16 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 PM 8; Kamehameha III React & (ween IKaahumanu Hwy 11;12-2421 I'4layament EBI EBT EBR 1NBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r :k 1. '� +T Traffic Volume (vehfh) 290 11 52 7 11 18 64 495 11 17 511 284 Future Volume ;wehlh) 290 11 52 7 11 18 64 495 11 17 511 289 Initial Q (02b), veh 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.G0 1.00 1.00 1.40 1,00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.100 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 1855 1767 1B11 1870 1$70 1870 1856 1850 1870 1870 1670 18%, Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 305 12 D 7 i2 19 67 521 12 18 538 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 5.95 0,95 0,95 0.95 195 0.95 0,95 0.95 0,95 D.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 8 5 i 2 2 3 ? 2 2 2 2 Gap,vehl11 364 14 11 20 31 89 882 20 37 1592 Arrive On Gruen 4,22 0.22 O.DD 0,04 0,04 0.04 0.05 0.4$ DA8 0.02 0,45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1622 64 1535 313 537 851 1767 1806 42 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 317 0 Pr 38 0 0 67 t0 533 18 538 0 Grp Sat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 1686 0 1535 1702 4 0 1767 0 1848 1781 1777" 0 0 Servefs-s), s 13.4 p_0 D.0 1.5 0.4 C1.0 2.8 0.0 15.8 0.7 7.4 0,0 Cycle fD dear(g_c), s 33.4 0.0 H 1.8 0,0 0.0 2.8 0.0 15,8 0.7 7,4 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.96 1.00 0.18 0.50 1-00 0.02 1.00 0.013 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 378 0 62 0 0 89 t7 882 37 1592 VJC Ratio(X) 0.64 0.40 0.61 0.00 000 0.75 0.00 0.60 0,48 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 584 0 580 0 0 168 D 882 122 1592 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,170 1.00 1.411 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 13.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 27.7 0.0 (1_0 35.5 0-0 0.0 35.1 O} O 14.3 36.2 13.4 0,0 Mor Delay (d2). slveh 6.4 0.0 O.D RA 0.0 0.4 12.1 0.0 3.1 9.5 0.6 8.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0_0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 5.8 0.0 0,0 0,$ 0.0 0.4 1.4 0.0 6..2 0.4 2.6 D:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 34.1 0.0 0.0 44.9 0.0 Ob 47.2 0.4 17.4 45.7 14.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A 0 A B D B Appfcauh Vol, veil h 317 A 38 baa 556 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 34.1 44.9 20.7 15.0 Approach LOS C D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s .21.3 8.3 38.0 7.2 B.1 43.2. Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 25.9 7.1 33.5 25.5 5.1 35.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 1:5.4 4.8 9,4 3.6 2.7 17.8 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 1.4 0.0 3,3 0.1 0.0 2,9 fntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 22.17° HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar) delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 FILM 6th Roundabout 2019 AM Roundabout I Hualalai Rd (North) 11108-2021 Irbirwdort Interseclion Dday slveh 27.1 Intersection LOS b ApprWh EB NB 9 Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, vebih 99 1235 866 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 101 1260 917 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh 884 48 180 Vehicles Exiling, vehlh 213 937 1128 Ped W Cr ng Leg, A 1 0 0 Pert Cap Adj LON 1,000 1,090 AWDnh Delay, siveh 8.9 34.3 191a Apprc-ach LOS A U C Lane. LA Lail Left' Designaied Moves LFA LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channeli4ed Lane Uil 1.0W 1,008 1.000 Fallow -Hp Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.97$ 4.976 Entry Flay, vehlh 101 1260 917 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 560 1314 1148 Entry HV Adj Fodor OAA 0.980 0.944 Flow Entry,. vehlh 99 1235 860 Cap Entry, veh;h 549 1238 1085 VIC Ratio 0.180 01959 0.798 Control Delay, siveh 8.9 34.3 19.0 LOS A d C 951h utile Que4e, veh 1 18 9 5:00 pm Basetine Synchre 10 Report Page 1 I°ICM 6th ROUndaboul 2019 AM Roundabout 4 Hualalai Rd (South) 11108,2021 lnte Born IMerseclion Dc4ay slveh 18.4 lnterseclion LOS G Appr0r h WB N8 8B Entry Larges 1 1 11 Conflicting Circle Lanes, 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, vebih 161 100 882 Demand Flaw Rate, vehlh 164 1122 927 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh t101 83 10 Vehicles Exiling, vehlh 101 854 1258 Ped W Cr ng Leg, A 0 p D Pert Cap Adj 1.00D 1.000 1.004 AWDnh Delay, siveh 14,7 24.2 11.8 Apprc-ach LOS B C B Large. Left Lel Lam' Designaied Moves LR TR LT Assumed Moves LFA TR LT RT Channeli4ed Lane Uil 1.001) 11000 1.000 Fallow -Up Headway, s 2.60a 2,609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.978 4.976 4.976 Entry Flay, vehlh 164 112.2 927 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 448 1268 1366 Entry HV Adj Fodor 0.`.P't 0.979 0.951 Flown Entry,. vehlh 161 1098 882 Cap Entry, veh;h 439 1241 1299 VIC Ratio 4,3616 0,885 0.679 Control Delay, siveh 14.7 24.2 11,8 LOS B C B 95th utile Que4e, veh 2 13 F 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 FILM 6th ROUndabou! 2019 AM Roundabout 6. Kuakini Street 11108202'1 lrbl Ilion IMerseclion Dc4ay slveh 75.6 intersection LOS F APPrWh EB NB 3B Entry Larges 1 1 1 Conflicting Circte Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Row, vetlih 190 1417 854 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 197 1471 6R8 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh 827 8 567 Vehicles Exiling, vehlh b3B 1g 16 612 Ped W Cr ng Leg, A 0 0 0 Pert Cap Adj 1.000 1,000 1,000 AWDnh DetaYr siveh 11.0 64.6 108e 1 Apprc-ach LOS B F F Lane. Left Leel Left Designaied Moves LR LT TFC Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channeli4ed Lane U it 1.000 1,000 1.000 Fallow -Up Headway, s 2.609 2,609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flay, vehlh 197 1471 898 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 594 1369 774 Entry HV Adj Fedor 0A64 0.963 0.951 FlDw Entry, vehlh 190 1417 854 Cap Entry, veh;h 573 1318 736 VEC Ratio 0,332 1,076 1.160 Control Delay, siveh 1 t,0 64.6 108.1 LOS B F F 95th utile Que4e, veh 1 30 27 5:00 pm Basetine Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Timings 2019 AM Protected Left Turn 7; Laky Street 11112.202'1 Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:114 Actuated Cycle Length; 106.8 Natural Cyde: 110 Control TyDe: Semi Art-Uncoord Nlaximum We Ra#o: 0.97 Inteisectian Signal delay: 44.4 Intersection LOS. Q Intersection Capacity Utilization 96, A ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Lako Stme" 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 ---W I Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET NEL NBT NBR SEL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 11� T4 ' + i t r Traffic Volume (vph) 251 48 59 36 33 792 55 141 647 125 Future Volume (vph) 251 46 fig 36 33 792 55 141 647 125 Turn Type Prat NA Piot NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Ferm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 7 4 ? 8 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9,5 54.1 54x4.1 1U 55.5 55.5 Total SPI rt(%) 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 20.510 8.6D/a 49.29 49.2% 9.9% 50.5% 50.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optiinize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effat Careen (s) 17.7 .25.2 9.8 110 54.7 49,7 49.7 58.$ 55.1 55.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.17 0.24 0.G9 0.14 0.51 0.47 0.47 0.55 0.52 0.52 vie Rabo 0.91 0.28 11411 0.88 0,14 0.97 0.08 0.90 0.72 0.15 Control Delay 79.4 22.3 55.4 46.0 12.6 54.4 0.8 72.7 27.6 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total delay 79.4 22.3 55,4 48,0 12.0 54,4 0.8 72.7 27,6 3.6 LOS E C E D B D A E C A App, cauh Deiay 61.3 47.7 49.4 31,3 Approach LOS E 0 0 C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:114 Actuated Cycle Length; 106.8 Natural Cyde: 110 Control TyDe: Semi Art-Uncoord Nlaximum We Ra#o: 0.97 Inteisectian Signal delay: 44.4 Intersection LOS. Q Intersection Capacity Utilization 96, A ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Lako Stme" 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Intersection SurTimary 2019 AM Protected Left Turn 7; Lako Street 11112.202'1 --. 11e- • ,� NbVement EBI_ EBT M WBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T V t r T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 251 48 59 69 36 267 33 742 55 141 647 125 Future Volume ;vehih) 251 48 69 69 36 267 33 792 55 141 6147 125 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.04 i.G0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1. DO 1.40 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1449 1811 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 267 51 a 73 38 0 35 849 4 150 688 G Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,04 0.94 0.94 0,94 0!94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap, vehlh 302 344 111 104 351 9a1 264 1025 Arrive On Green 0.17 0.15 0.00 0,4E 0.06 •0.110 0.03 0.52 UOQ 0.06 0,55 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 3870 0 1781 1870 15610 1725 1856 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 267 51 G 73 38 0 35 843 D 150 668 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 4 1767 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 1585 0 Serves -s), s 13.8 2.2 Q.a 3.8 1.9 0.0 0.8 36.q 11.0 3.7 24.9 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 13.8 2.2 0.0 3.8 1.9 0.0 0.8 36.13 4.17 3,7 24.9 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 d.DD 1.04 0.00 1.00 1,04 1.00 1 -DO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 302 304 111 144 351 931 264 1025 VIC Ratio(X) 0.88 0.17 0.66 0.36 0.10 0.86 6,57 067 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 339 855 336 356 388 981 278 1025 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 ll Ox 1.00 1.00 1.00 1•Q0 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0. DO 1.00 1.94 0.00 1.00 1A0 4.DO 1.40 1.00 11.00 Uniform Delay (d), c'veb 38.4 341 0.0 43.3 43.0 0.0 12.2 19.1 0,C 18.4 15,0 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 21.5 0.3 0.4 6.5 2.1 0.0 D.1 9.7 4.0 2.5 3.5 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 7.8 1,0 0.0 1.9 0,9 0.0 D.3 17.4 0.0 1.6 10.7 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 59.9 34.3 0.0 49.8 45.1 0.0 12.4 25.1 0.0 20.8 18.5. 0.0 LnGrp LOS E C D D B C C B Apprcauh Vol, veb!h 318 A 111 A 878 A 838 A Approach Delay, sve,h 55.6 48.2 26.5 19.0 Approach LOS E D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.1 54.1 10.4 19.9 7.5 56.7 20.5 9.& Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.4 49,6 18.4 18.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 1&0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.7 38.9 5.8 4,2 2.8 26.9 15.8 3.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 4.6 0.1 071 0.0 5.1 0.2 4.1 Intersection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 29.B HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2019 AM Permissive Left TUm T; Lake Street 11112.202'1 ---W 'r *,-- I` Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NEL NBT NBR SEL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 T4 ' + iN Vi t r Traffic Volume (vph) 251 48 59 36 33 792 55 141 647 125 Future Volume (vph) 251 46 fig 36 33 792 55 141 647 125 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. NA Pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 B 2 277 5 6 t (`it Phase Q ' 1 4 p L U w 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5,0 5.0 5,0' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9,5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 38,1 39.1 39.1 39.1 9,5 50.7 50.7 10,2 51,4 51,4 Total SPI it(%) 39.1°%6 39.1"A 39.1'/% 35.1% 9.5% 50.7% 50.7% 10.2°10 51 A% 51A% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.g 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1, C 160 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 u.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4..5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None Nave Nene None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Careen (s) 34.6 34.6 34.E 34,6 53.2 46,2 46.2 54.1 50.7 50.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0,35 0.35 0,35 0,35 0.51 0,46 0.46 4.54 0.51 0.51 vie Ratio 1.04 0.20 0.17 0:48 0;14 0.98 4.08 4.91 0,74 0.15 Control Delay 101,1 11.4 24.2 12.5 11.1 54,0 3.8 71.0 28.5 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,4 0 0 0,0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Total flay 101,1 11.4 24,2 12.5 11.1 54,0 3.8 71,0 26.5 3,2 LOS F B C B B D A E C A Appicauh Letay 72.7 14.6 49.2 30.1 Apprc,ach LOS E E D C Intersection Summa C�Qle Lea qlh. 100 AcNa'keo Cycle Length; 100 Natural Cyte: 100 Control TyDe: Semi Act-uncuord Nlaximum We Ratio -.1(04 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 41.7 Intersection LOS. 0 Intersection Capacity lJoiization 96.9% ILLI Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Intersection SurTimary 2019 AM Permissive! Left Turn 7; Lako Street 11112.202'1 --. 11e- • ,� NbVement EBI_ EBT M WBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T V t r T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 251 48 59 69 36 267 33 742 55 141 647 125 Future Volume ;wehih) 251 48 69 69 36 267 33 792 55 141 6147 125 Initial Q (02b), vete 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.04 i.G0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1. DO 1.40 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No Add Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1449 1811 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 267 51 0 73 38 0 35 B43 0 150 6B8 G Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,04 0.94 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap, vehlh 390 447 3761 447 382 1015 294 1057 Arrive On Green 0.24 0.24 0.00 0,24 0.24 •0.110 0.03 4.54 UOQ 0.06 0,57 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1367 1870 0 1340 1870 0 1781 1870 15610 1725 1856 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 267 51 G 73 38 0 35 843 0 150 668 0 Grp Sat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 136T 1870 0 1340 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 18'5& 1585 0 Serves -s), s 14.1 1_B D.G 3.8 1.3 0.0 G,7 31.9 0.0 3.2 21.6 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 17.4 1.8 H 5.7 1.3 0,0 11.7 31.9 0.0 3.2 21.6 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 390 447 376 447 882 1015 294 1057" VJC Ratio(X) 0.69 0,11 0.19 009 0.08 0.B3 0.51 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 619 750 641 760 427 1015 306 1057 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1X 1.00 1.00 1.170 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 31,9 25.3 0.0 .27.6 26.2 0.0 10.1 16.2 0'c 15.2 12,5 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 2.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 7.9 0,0 1.4 3.1 U In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 5.4 0.8 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 14.4 0.0 1.3 8.9 D:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 34,1 25.5 0.0 27.8 25.2 0.0 111.2 24.1 0.0 16.6 15.7 11.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C B C B B Apprcauh Vol, veb!h 318 A 111 A 878 A 838 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 32.7 26.9 23.5 15.8 Approach LOS C C C B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 5 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.6 50.7 24.8 7.3 53.0 24.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.7 46.2 X6 5.0 416.9 34.6 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.2 33.9 19,4 2.7 23.6 7.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 5.0 09 0,0 5.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 22,1 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Timings 2019 AIS ProtPermLeft Turn 7; Lako Street 11:12.2021 --I' "--I' Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 1 T. + iN t Traffic Volume (vph) 251 48 59 36 33 792. 55 141 647 125 Future Volume (vph) 251 48 fig 36 33 792 55 141 647 125 Turn Type pm+pt ISA pm -pt NA pm+pi NA Porn pm' -pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 PermitladPhases 4 B 2 277 6 6 Q t (`it Phase 1 4 �.�. U w L 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,0' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9.5 22.5 95 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (5) 157 25.0 10 2 2215 9,5 51.4 51.4 10.4 52,3 :2.3 Total SPI ft (%) 15.7% 28.0"1 10.2% 22.5% 9.5% 51.4% 51.4% 10.4% 52.3% 52.3"A Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1,0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Recall Mode None None Nene None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 29.1 21.1 19.1 13,4 52.0 47,(1 47.0 55.4 52.0 52.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.30 0.22 0.20 0.14 0.54 0.49 0.49 4.5,9 0.54 0.54 vie Raba 0.95 0-29 0,25 4.84 0,12 0.92 0.07 0.85 0,69 0.14 Control Delay 72.4 17.8 26.6 38,5 10.0 40.6 0.2 58.5 22.7 1.7 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 0,0 6.0 0,17 0,0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Total delay 72.4 17.8 26.6 36,5 10.0 40.6 p.2 58,6 22,7 1.7 LOS E 6 C 0 A Q A E C A App, cauh Letay 55.1 34,6 36.9 25.4 Approach LOS E C t7 C Intersection Summa CpQle Leoplh. 100 Actua4et! Cycle Length, 95.6 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum vlc Ratio: 0.95 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 35.1 Intersection LOS. Q Intemdon Capacity lJolization 96.91 ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 7. Lake S1ree" 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Intersection SurTimary 2019 AM ProtPermLeft Turn 7; Lako Street 11112.202'1 --. 11e- • ,� NbVement EBI_ EBT M WBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 T V t r T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 251 48 59 69 36 267 33 742 55 141 647 125 Future Volume ;wehih) 251 48 69 69 36 267 33 792 55 141 647 125 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 4 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 0,99 1.Go 1.00 1,00 1.010 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} I.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na Na No 04 Dat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1970 1441 1811 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 267 51 0 73 38 0 35 B43 0 150 6B8 G Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 p.94 8,94 0.9+4 0,94 D.9A Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Cap, vehlh 3701 260 253 113 380 1014 292 1056 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.14 0.00 0.05 0.06 •0.00 0.03 0.54 UOQ 0.06 0,57 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 18701 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 267 51 G 73 38 0 35 843 0 150 668 0 Grp Sat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 1585 0 Serves -s), s 11.2 2.1 D.G 3.3 1.7 0.0 0,7 32.5 U.0 3.3 22.x7 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 11,2 2.1 0,0 3.3 1.7 0.0 D.7 32.5 4.0 33 22.0 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 D.01D 1.00 0,00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.44 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 374 260 253 113 380 1014 292 1056 VIC Ratio(X) 0.72 0-20 0.29 0.34 0.08 0.B3 0,51 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 370 508 280 389 424 1014 306 1056 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1,00 1.001 1,6{1 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 31.8 33.0 D_D 35.6 39.0 0.0 10.3 16.5 0,0 15.5 12,8 0,17 hor Delay (d2). slveh 6.8 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.7 0.0 0.1 7.9 0,0 1.A 3.1 U In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 5.7 1.0 0.0 1.A 0.8 0.0 D.3 14,7 0.0 1.3 9.1 D:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 38.6 33.3 0.1] 363 40.7 0,0 14.4 24.4 4.0 16.9 15.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D D B C B B Approauh Val, veb!h 318 A 111 A 875 A 838 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 37.8 37.8 23.8 16.1 Approach LOS D D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 7 B PAs Duration (G+Y+Ra), s 9.7 51.4 8.9 14.5 7.3 53.7 15.7 9.7 Change Period (Y*Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.9 46.9 5.7 23.5 5.0 47,8 11.2 1&0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.3 34.5 5.3 41 2.7 24.0 13,2 3.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 5.0 0,4 0.2 0.0 5.1 0.01 0.1 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 2;x.11 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectloo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Timings 2019 AM 4 -Lane T; Lasko Street 11112.202'1 lntersedan Summa Cycle Length:80 Actuated Cycle Length:: 70 Natural Cycle: 80 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Unooard Maximum u c Rath: 0.78 Inteisectlan Signal Celan: 25.1 Intersectlan LOS- C Inter tion Capacity U6iizatiori 77.1 ICU Level of Smice D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Lako Street \001 toz 4 *Too NEEL 05 <-06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 7 -__W '*'-- I 1* Large Group EBI` EBT W8L 'WET NEL NBT NBR SEL SET Safi Lane CDnfiguratians I 1� 1i T4 TT +t Traffic Volume (vph) 251 48 59 36 33 7S2 55 141 647 125 Future Volume (vph) 251 48 fig 36 33 7ta2 55 141 647 125 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pl NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 6 a 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) .22.5 22,5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 25.5 25.5 9.5 25.5 25-5 Total SPI €t(%) 26.1% 28.1" 28.1% 28.1% 11.9° 31.9% 31.9"6 11.9If$ 31.9% 31.9' Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead LaEg Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Gptirnlze? Yes Yea Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse Ncne Nave None FA ax Max None Max Max kt Eftct Green (8) 14.8 14.6 1U 10.8 26.3 21.3 21.3 29.3 27.5 27.5 Actuated gr C Ratio 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.15 0.38 0.30 0.30 0.42 0,39 0,39 vie Ratio 0.72 4.30 0.27 0.74 0.11 0.78 4.11 0.68 0.50 4-19 Contras Delay 38.7 14.0 28.8 20.5 15.2 30.7 0.4 35.1 20.9 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.4 4.0 L,0 Total Delay 38.7 14.0 28.8 20.6 15.2 30.7 0.4 36.1 20.9 1.8 LOS D B C C B C A D C A App, cauh Deiay 30.9 22.1 28.2 21.0 Appreeeh LOS C C C C lntersedan Summa Cycle Length:80 Actuated Cycle Length:: 70 Natural Cycle: 80 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Unooard Maximum u c Rath: 0.78 Inteisectlan Signal Celan: 25.1 Intersectlan LOS- C Inter tion Capacity U6iizatiori 77.1 ICU Level of Smice D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Lako Street \001 toz 4 *Too NEEL 05 <-06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 7 HCM kith Signalized Intersection SurTimary 2019 AM 4 -Large T; Lako Street 11112.202'1 --. 11e- IN 41 -01 I'4layament EBI_ EBT M WBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T V +t r t+ r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 251 48 59 69 36 267 33 71,12 55 141 W 125 Future Volume ;vehih) 251 48 69 69 36 267 33 792 55 141 647 125 Initial Q (0b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.010 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1070 1449 18? 1 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 267 51 0 73 38 0 35 843 0 150 688 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Gap,vehl11 335 352 129 136 378 1261 357 1403 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.00 0,07 0.07 •0.00 0.04 0.35 100 0.08 0.40 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 17B1 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1751 3554 1560, 1725 3526 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 267 51 G 73 38 0 35 843 G 151) 688 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1777 1560 1725 1763 1585 0 Serves -s), s 8.5 1.3 0.t} 24 1.1 0.0 0.7 11.a 0.0 3_2 8.6 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 8.5 1.3 0.0 2.4 1,1 0.0 0.7 11.9 4.0 3.2 H 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 335 352 129 136 378 1261 357 1403 VJC Ratio(X) 0.80 0.15 0,57 0.28 0.08 0.67 0.42 0.49 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 542 569 538 569 462 1261 365 1403 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,OD 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 22.9 20,1 0.0 26.5 26.0 0.0 11.5 16.1 fi.L' 11.9 13.3 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 4.4 0.2 0.4 19 1.1 10.0 0.1 2.8 0,0 0.8 1.2 U In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 3.7 0.6 0.0 1,1 0,5 0.0 D.3 4A 0.0 1.1 3.2 D:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 27.3 20.2 0.0 30.4 27.1 Ob 11.6 19.0 0.0 12.7 14.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C B B B B Apprcauh Vol, veb!h 318 A 111 A 878 A 838 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 26.2 29.3 16.7 14,2 Approach LOS C C B B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.2 25.5 15.6 6.7 28.1 8.8 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.0 21.0 18.0 5.0 21,0 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.2 13.8 10,5 %.7 10.6 4.4 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 3.3 0.7 4.0 3.4 0.3 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 1&. HChA 6th LOS 8 Notes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 8 FILM 6th R0Undabaut 2019 PM Roundabout I Hualalai Rd (North) 11108,2421 Irbirwdorl IMerseclion Dc4ay slveh 18.3 Intersection LOS C ApprWh EB NB $B Entry Larges 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flaw, vebih 82 10391 1054 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 83 1079 1076 Vehicles Circulaftg, vehlh 1057 10 r49 3lehic;les Exiling, vehlh 108 1130 1040 Ped W Cr ng Leg, #41 0 0 a Pert Cap Adj 1.000 1,400 1.004 Apia ch Detayr s1veh 10.3 16.1 21.2. Apprc-ach LOS B C C Large. LIR Leek Lest' Designaied Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channeli4ed Lane Uil 1.000 1,000 1.000 Fallow -Up Headway, s 2.649 2,609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flay, vehlh 83 1079 1076 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 470 1366 1260 Entry HV Adj Fodor OAA 0,963 0.880 Flown Entry,. vehlh 82 1039 10544 Cap Entry, veh;h 464 1315 1235 VIC Ratio 4.177 0,790 0.854 Control Delay, siveh 10.3 16.1 21.2 LOS B C C 951h utile Que4e, veh 1 9 12 5:00 pm Basetine Synchre 10 Report Page 1 I°ICM 6th ROUndaboul 2019 PM Roundabout 4 Hualalai Rd (South) 11108,2921 Irbirwdorl IMerseclion Dc4ay slveh 17.2 lnterseclion LCIS G ApprWh WB NR BB Entry Larges 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 b 1 Adj Approach Flaw, vebih 87 X37$ 11 D9 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 89 1002 1135 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh 998 68 15 Vehicles Exiling, vehlh 72 1082 1072 Ped W Cr ng Leg, A 0 0 D Pert Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 AWDnh DelaYr siveh 9.9 16,0 18,7 Apprc-ach LOS A C C Large. Left Leif Lam' Designaied Moves LR TR LT Assumed Moves LR TR LT RT Channeli4ed Lake Lxtil 1.000 11000 1.000 Fallow -Up Headway, s 2.609 2,609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flay, vehlh 69 1002 1135 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 499 1287 1359 Entry HV Adj Fedor 0A78 0,971 0.977 Flown Entry,. vehlh 87 973 1109 Cap Entry, veh;h 487 1250 1929 VIC Ratio 0.178 0,778 0.835 Control Delay, siveh 9.9 16,0 18.7 LOS A C C 951h utile Que4e, veh 1 8 11 5:00 pm Basetine Synchro 10 Report Page 2 I°ICM 6th ROUndaboul 2019 PM Roundabout 6. Kuakini Street 11108,2021 Irbirwdorl IMerseclion Dc4ay slveh 247 lnterseclion LCIS G ApPrWh EB NB ;Sly Entry Larges 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flaw, ve'hih 393 1119 942 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 402 1150 962 Vehicles Circulaling, vehlh 923 14 253 3lehic:les Exiling, vehlh 292 13t1 911 Ped W Cr ng Leg, #41 0 0 D Pert Cap Adj 1.009 1.000 1,600 Apia ch Deeayr siveh 79.1 1915 29,4 Apprc-ach LOS D C a Large. Lit Leel Leff' Designaied Moves LFA LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Channeli4ed Lane Util 1.000 1,000 1.000 Fallow-UpHeadway, s 2.6[9 2,609 2.609 Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 Entry Flay, vehlh 402 1150 962 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 538 1360 1066 Entry HV Adj Fedor OA7it 0,973 0.979 Flown Entry,. vehlh 393 1119 942 Cap Entry, veh;h 626 1323 1044 VIC Ratio 0.747 6.848 6.902 Control Delay, siveh 28,1 19,6 29.4 LOS D C C 95th utile Que4e, veh 6 11 13 5:00 pm Basetine Synchre 16 Report Page 3 Timings 2019 PM Protected Left Turn 7; Lako Street 11112.202'1 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N8L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 1� T4 + iN t Traffic Volume (vph) 12T 30 52 39 37 754 64 1 a1 577 170 Future Volume (vph) 127 30 fit 39 37 754 54 181 677 170 Turn Type Prat NA Pkat NA pm+pt NA Perm pm-�pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permitbad Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectof Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,0' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Sp1i# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9,5 52.2 52.2 12,8 55,5 55.5 Total SPI it(%) 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 8.6% 47,5% 47.5% 11.61% 50.5% 50.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 'Yes Yas Yes Recall Mode None None None Nave None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.5 15.5 9.0 9.7 53.0 48.0 48.0 60.2 55.5 55.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.13 0.16 UR 9.10 0.55 0.50 0.50 0.62 0.57 0.57 vie Ratio 0,59 0_26 DAD 0.73 022 O.SS 4.08 01.73 0,86 0.18 Control Delay 51.6 19.4 50.2 24.4 12.4 34.4 1.5 31.7 30.7 5.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 07 0 D.6 6.0 0.4 D.0 0.0 u 0.0 Total Delay 51.5 19.4 50.2 24.4 12.4 34.4 1.5 31.7 30.7 5.3 LOS D B 13 C B C A C C A Appicauh Letay 39.4 29.9 311.9 27.3 Approaoh LOS D C C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:114 Actuated Cycle Length; 96.7 Natural Cyde: 110 Control TyDe, Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum We Ratio: 0.86 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 29.8 Intersectlan LOS: C inter tion Capacity UGiization 86,3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 7. Lako Street 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Surnmary 20119 Pili Protected Left Turn T; Lako Strut 11112-2021 ---w '---•41 I'4layament EBS. EBT EER WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 14 T V t I T � Traffic Volume (vehfh) 12T 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 64 181 877 170 Future Volume ;vehlh) 127 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 64 181 877 170 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 4 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uo 1.00 1,00, 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1856 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 132 31 0 65 41 0 39 7B5 0 189 914 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0,�6 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,90 D.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Gap, vehlh 173 178 107 103 277 10H 373 1119 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.00 0,06 0.06 9A0 0.04 x].57 O.00 0.07 0.60 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1555 1767" 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 132 31 G 65 41 D 39 785 0 189 914 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serves -s), s 6.3 1.3 p.0 3.0 1.8 0.0 0.8 27.1 0.0 3.7 32-7 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 6.3 1.3 0.0 30 1,8 0.0 0.8 27.1 0.0 3.7 32.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veN b 173 178 107 173 277 1050 373 1119 VJC Ratio(X) 0.76 0.17 0.81 0.40 0,14 0.75 0,51 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 370 395 376 386 316 105D 426 1119 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.0{1 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 37,4 35.5 0.0 39.1 38.8 0.0 12.6 13.9 f7.L' 12.4 115 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 61 0.5 0.4 6.5 2.5 0.0 0.2 4.9 0,0 1.1 6.6 9.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 17.0 0.0 0,0 110 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacict'}ftn(54°l9),vehfln 3.0 D.6 0.0 1.6 0.9 0.0 D.3 11.6 0.0 1.3 13.9 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 44.2 35.9 4.0 44.8 41.3 0.0 12.8 18.8 0.0 13.4 20.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D B B B C Appfcauh Val, vett h 163 A 106 A 624 A 1103 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 42.6 43.3 18.5 19.0 Approach LOS D D B B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 52.7 9.6 12.6 7.5 55.5 12.9 9.3 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8.3 473 18.0 18.0 5.0 51.0 18.0 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.7 29.1 5.0 3.3 2.8 34.7 8.3 3.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,1 5.6 0.1 011 0:0 6.6 n.2 0.1 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 213 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Timings 2019 PM Permissive Left TUm T; Lake Street 11112.202'1 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N8L NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane CDnfiguratians I 1� T4 + iN t Traffic Volume (vph) 12T 30 52 39 37 754 64 101 577 170 Future Volume (vph) 127 30 fit 39 37 754 54 181 677 170 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. NA pm+pt NA Perm pm-�pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 $ 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 4 8 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0 Minimum Split ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 24.0 24.0 24,0 24.0 9,5 54.4 54.4 11,0 56,5 56.5 Total SPI it(%) 26.7% 26.7% 26.7% 26.7% 10.6% EGA% 60.4% 12.9% 62,8°!� 6Z8°'7 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 110 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag € a nlze? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Name None None None Max PAax None Max Max Act Effut Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 55.0 50.0 50.0 60.0 55.9 55.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.62 0.56 0.56 0.68 0.63 0.63 vie Ratio OX 0.21 0.24 0,50 0.15 0.75 0.07 0.57 0.78 4.17 Control Delay 97.9 15.5 32.0 11.3 6.2 20.9 2.4 12.2 19.8 1.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.6 6.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 13,0 Total Delay 87.9 15.5 32,0 11,3 6,2 20,9 2,4 12.2 19.5 1.8 LOS F B C B A C A B E A App, cauh Delay 66,5 15.7 18.9 1b.2 Approach LOS E 8 S V Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length; 88.5 Natural Cyde: 90 Control Type; Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: 0.94 Inteiseclian Signal Nlayr 21,0 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 86,3% ICU Level of'Senvice E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 71 Lako Street 31 t02 p � 05 06 7 �it3 E-- 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 PM Permissive Left Turn T; Lake Strut 11112-2021 ---w '---•41 I'4layament EBS. EBT EBR WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 14 T V t 1 1 T � Traffic Volume (vehfh) 12T 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 C41 181 877 170 Future Volume ;vehlh) 127 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 64 181 877 170 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.c0 1.00 1.Go 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.a0 1.00 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1855 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Flour Rate,. vehlh 132 31 a 65 41 0 39 7B5 0 189 914 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0.95 0.95 0,96 0.96 0,90 D.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cep. vehlh 257 268 268 262 347 1159 440 1218 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 {1.00 0.14 0.14 •O.110 0.04 0.52 O.00 U6 045 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 134-4 1870 0 1378 1826 0 1767 1856 1555 1761 1670 1585 Grp Valume(v;. vehfh 132 31 G 65 41 0 39 785 0 189 914 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1344 1870 0 1378 1826 0 1767 1858 1585 1767 1870 1585 0 Serves -s), s 7.6 1.2 0 0 3.4 1.G 0.0 0.6 22.0 0.0 3.0 25.6 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 9.2 1.2 0.0 4.6 1,6 0.0 0.6 22.0 4.0 3.0 26.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh-b 257 268 268 262 347 11% 440 1218 VJC Ratio(X) 0.51 0.12 a,24 0 T 0.11 0.88 0.43 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 392 457 407 446 393 1159 486 1216 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.170 1.Q0 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00, 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 34.0 29.8 0-0 31.8 30.0 0.0 8.7 9.8 0.0 8.5 9,5 0,0 Mor Delay (d2). siveh 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.5 03 0.0 GA 3.2 0,0 0.7 4.3 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.0 0.4 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirtDftD(54°l9),vehfln 2.5 0,5 0.0 1.2 0-7 0.0 0.2 8.4 0.0 0.9 10.1 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 316 30.0 0.0 32.3 30.2 0.0 8.9 12.9 0.0 9.2 13.8 6.0 LnGrp LOS D C C C A B A B Appfcauh Val, vett h 163 A 106 A 824 A 1103 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 34.5 31.5 12.7 13.0 Approach LOS C C B B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 5 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rq s 9.5 54.4 16.0 7.4 56.5 16.0 Change Period (Y*Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 7.1 49.9 19.5 5.0 52.0 19.5 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.0 24.1] 11,2 2,6 28.6 6.6 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 6.4 0.3 0.0 7.8 0.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 15.4 HChA 6th LOS B N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Timings 2019 PM Pra'tPerrn LDft Tern T; Lako Street 11:12.2021 --I' '--W 'r *.-- t Large Group EBL EBT WBL 'WET NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane CDnfiguratians I 1� T4 + r T Traffic Volume (vph) 12T 30 52 39 37 764 64 181 877 170 Future Volume (vph) 127 30 fit 39 37 754 64 181 877 170 Turn Type pm+pt ISA pm -pt NA Dm+pl NA Perm prn+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 5 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 ,h Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9.5 22.5 95 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 9,5 46.8 46.8 11,2 48,5 45.5 Total SPI ft (%) 10.6 0 28.0"1 10.6% 25.0% 10.6% 52.0% 52.0% 12.4°/o 53.9% 53.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.8 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{) 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Tatar Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 44 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies 'yes Recall Mode None None Nene None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effut Green (s) 14.8 10.9 13.9 8.9 47.4 42.4 42.4 62.0 48.0 48.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.18 0.13 0.17 0,11 0,59 0.52 0.52 0.64 0.59 0,59 vie Raba 0.70 0.30 025 0.69 018 0.81 4.08 0.56 0.83 0.18 Control Delay 47.9 18.8 27.3 19.0 7.9 25.7 0.4 20.4 24.4 2.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.9 18.8 27.3 119,0 7,9 25.7 0.4 20.4 24.4 2.7 LOS D B C B A C A C C A App, cauh Letay 36.9 20A 23.0 20.8 Approach LOS D C C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih. 90 Actuated Cycle Length; 81 Natural Cyde: 90 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord N'laximum We Ratio: 4.83 Inteisecllan Signal delay: 22.8 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intention Niiadty Utilization 86,3% ICU Level of 5eNce P Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 77: Lako Street \0131 o2 1 0I p 4- 05 � 06 � 197 0116 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 PM ProtPerm Left Turn 7; Lako Strut 11112-2021 ---w '---•41 I'4layament EBS. EBT EER WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 14 T V t 1 1 T � Traffic Volume (vehfh) 12T 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 041 181 877 170 Future Volume ;wehth) 127 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 64 181 877 170 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.c0 1.00 1.Go 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.015 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1851? 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 132 31 0 65 41 0 39 7B5 0 189 914 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.D6 0.96 0,96 0,96 0A 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,90 D.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? 2 3 2 2 Gap, vehlh 267 149 270 114 287 1042 384 1113 Arrive On Green 0.07 0_08 {1.00 0.05 0.06 9A0 0,04 0.58 O.CC 0A7 -D.59 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1555 1767 1670 1585 Grp Volume(v . vehfh 132 31 G 65 41 D 39 785 0 1" 914 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 0 Serves -s), s 5.0 1.2 0 0 2.5 1.b 0.0 0.7 24.2 010 3.3 29.2 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_cj, 5 5.0 1.2 0.0 2.5 1,6 0.0 0.7 24.2 4.0 3.3 29,2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 6.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c},vehdh 26T 149 270 114 287 1042 384 1113 VJC Ratio(X) 0.49 0,21 0,24 0.36 0.14 0.75 0.49 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 267 447 300 436 339 1042 417 1113 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.170 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.1741 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.D0 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 31,0 32.+4 0.0 30.8 33.8 0.0 11.2 12.5 0.0 11.1 12.1 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 1 A 0.7 0.4 0.5 1.9 0.0 0.2 5.0 0,0 1.0 6.9 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1) .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacicClftD(54°l9),vehrfln 2.3 0.5 0.0 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.2 10.01 0.0 1.1 12.1 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),slveh 32.4 33.1 0.0 31.3 35.7 0.0 11.5 17.6 0.0 12.1 18.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C D B B B B Appfcauh Vol, vett h 153 A 106 A 824 A 1103 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 32.6 33.0 17.3 17.8 Approach LCIS C C B B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.8 46.8 8.2 10.5 7.3 49.3 9.5 9.2 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.7 42.3 5.0 18.0 5.0 44.01 5.0 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.3 26.2 4.5 3.2 2.7 31.2 7.0 3.6 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 5.3 0.0 011 0.0 5.7 0.0 0.1 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay HChA 6th LOS 0 N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bras.,;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Timings 2019 PM 4 -Lane T; Lako Street 11112.202'1 _-* � r" � 1 r Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET l4EL NBT NBIR SK SET SEI Lane Configuratians I 1-1� T4 TT tt Traffic Volume (vph) 12T 30 52 39 37 7.54 64 181 577 170 Future Volume (vph) 127 30 fit 39 37 754 64 181 877 170 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pt NA Perm pm-�pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 $ a 5 2 ? 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.10 Minimum Spli# (s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) .22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 24.6 24.6 10,4 25.5 25.5 Total SPI it(%) 26.1% 28.1" 28.1% 28.1% 11.9° 30.8% 30.13"A 13.G°fo 31.910 31.9' Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tatar Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnlze? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse Ncne None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effut Green (s) 10.0 10.0 8.7 8.7 25.8 20.7 20.7 3p.1 28.4 28.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.14 0,14 0.42 0.34 0.34 0.49 0.46 0.46 vie Ratio 0.46 0.25 0.26 0.61 0;13 0.66 4.11 4.59 0.56 0.22 Control Delay 30.5 14.4 27.3 14,0 12.2 23.3 0.4 22.9 18.8 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 Do 6.0 0.4 D.0 O.G 0.0 11.0 Total Delay 30.5 14.4 27.3 14.0 12.2 23.3 0.4 22.9 16.8 1.5 LOS C E C B E C A C E A App, cauh Letay 24.4 16,8 21.1 17.3 Approach LOS it 8 C B Intersedan Summa Cycle Length:80 Actuated Cycle Length, 61,1 Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type; Semi Ac#-Unroord N'laximum vac Rana: 0.66 Inteisection Signal Celay.19.1 Intersection LOS. B Intemdon Capacity Utilization fib, A ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 771 Lako Street 11,6011 02 4U4 4�8 05 � 06 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2019 PM 4-Lar1e T; Lako Strut 11112-2021 ---w '---` I'4layament EBS. EBT EER WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 14 T V ft 1 1 tT i!` Traffic Volume (vehfh) 12T 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 64 181 877 170 Future Volume ;wehlh) 127 30 48 62 39 193 37 754 64 381 877 170 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.c0 1.00 Uo 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.a0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 16710 1870 1826 1626 1055 1856 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 132 31 0 65 41 0 39 7B5 0 189 914 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0A 0,96 0,96 0.96 0,90 D.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? 2 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 187 200 133 137 355 1346 444 1540 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.00 0,07 0,07 •0.00 0.04 0.38 O.OQ Q.09 0,43 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 3525 1585 1767 3554 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 132 31 G 65 41 0 39 785 0 189 914 0 Grp Sat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1761 1826 0 1767 1763 1585 1767 1777 1585 0 Serves -s), s 3.B 0.8 0.t} 1.8 1.1 0.0 0-7 9.3 110 3.3 10_3 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_cj, 5 3.8 0.8 0.0 1.8 1,1 0.0 07 9.3 0.0 3.3 10.3 D.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0. DO 1.00 0.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veO 187 200 133 137 355 1346 444 1546 VJC Ratio(X) 0.70 0.16 0,49 0.30 0.11 0.58 0.43 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 600 640 609 624 450 1346 475 1548 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,0{1 1,00 1.00 1.170 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.40 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 22.7 21.3 0.0 23.4 230 4.0 9.5 12.9 0.0 9.1 11.3 O'D hor Delay (d2). siveh 4.8 DA 0.4 2.7 1.2 0.0 GA 1.9 0,0 0.6 1.7 0.0 In!r at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 U .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirCkftD(54°l9),vehfln 1.7 0.3 0.0 0.8 0,5 0.0 0.2 3.5 0.0 1.1 3.7 0,C1 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 27.5 21.7 0.0 26.1 24.3 0.0 9.7 14.8 0.0 9.8 13.0 10 LnGrp LOS C C C C .4 B A B Appfcauh Val, veli h 163 A 106 A 824 A 1103 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 26.4 25.4 14.5 12.4 Approach LCIS C C B B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 24.6 10.1 6.7 27.4 8.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.9 20.1 18.0 5.0 21.0 113.D Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 5.3 11.3 5.8 2.7 12.3 3.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 3.5 0.4 0.0 4.1 03 tntefsection Summary HCC 8th. Ctrl Delay X4.9 HCl`A 6th LOS 0 N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Appendix D Analysis Reports — Future 'Without Project Conditions (2424) Tinilr-gS 202,1 AM "10 t F'c31ici11i Rd & Qt.pc%G-ll KaLfl1LWidl-1U ' WY 1 ,If7KI { Large Group EBL EBT EBR IVVBL VVBT WET NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M tt r M +'t e 1) +t ' tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 71 512 218 1154 754 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Future Volume (vph) 71 512 218 164 754 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Turn Type Prat NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 Permitbad Phases 4 0 2 5 Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 O Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 MinimumSplit W 9.5 38.5 38,5 95 38,5 38.5 9,5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 X42.5 Total Split (5) 11.0 39.0 39,G 1&0 44.0 44,0 20.0 54.8 54,8 10.2 45.0 45.0 Total SPI ft (%) 9.2% 32.5% 32.5% 13.3% 36,7% 38.7% 16.7% 45.7% 45.7% $.5 f; 37.5% 37.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Nome Max Max None Ncne None None Name None Act Effct Green (s) 6.4 36.2 36.2' A, fi 41.8 41.8 11.9 30.1 30.1 5.8 17.3 17.3 Actuated grO Ratio 0.07 0.39 D.39 0,10 0.45 0.45 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.19 6.19 vie Raba 0.33 0.41 4.32 0:4$ 0,54 0.04 0.58 4.17 0.20 0.19 9.50 0.41 Control Delay 49.9 24.4 5.2 46.7 22.6 0.1 45.8 23.4 3.9 51.4 36,3 7.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 D.0 17.0 0.0 o.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 49.9 24.4 5.2 45,7 22.8 4.1 45.8 23.4 3,9 61.4 36.3 7,6 LOS D C A D C A D C A D D A Appicauh Letay 2.1.4 26A 29,1 27.1 Approeuh LOS C 0 C C Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 124 Actuated Cycle Length; 93.3 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe, Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum u c Ratio. 0.58 Intersection Signal Dalae: 25,6 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersection Capacity U61ization 63.3% ICU Level of 5eNce B Analysis Period [min) 15 and Phases; 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahumariu "'oo>< I T02 I flo3 1 4 1 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Ir,ttorsection SUn-trna{y 2024 AM WO 1, Palani Rd & Queen KaahUn�anu Hwy 11:1212021 ._ arrtent EBL EBT EBR wBL WBT WBR NIL NOT MR SEL f $,OR Lane Configurations �1 tt r )I tt 1) ++ r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 71 512 218 1644 754 33 248 192 117 21 321 177 Future Volume ;wehih) 71 512 218 164 754 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Initial Q (02b), veal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 120 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1737 1767 1737 1841 1811 1841 1841 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 72 522 0 167 769 0 248 198 0 21 328 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.96 0.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.88 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,98 0,98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cep. vehlh 159 1554 250 1676 344 775 41 498 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.46 {1.00 0.07 0,49 •0.00 0.10 0.22 UQ 0.02 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1MU 3401 3554 1572 1751 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 72 522 C, 167 769 0 246 1K 0 21 :328 0 Grp Sat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 1605 1678 1472 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1585 Q Serves -s), s 1.B 8.0 0.0 3.9 12.0 0.0 5_7 3.7 0.0 0.9 7.1 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 1.8 8.0 0.0 3.9 12.0 0.0 5.7 3.7 0.0 0.9 7.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 110 1.D0 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh ih 159 1594 250 1676 344 775 41 498 VJC Ratio(X) 0.45 0.34 0.67 0.45 0.72 0.25 0.51 0 R Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 257 1554 482 1676 660 2205 125 1775 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.70 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 4.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), cMh 37.5 13_$ 0_0 36.6 13.7 0.0 35.3 26.2 0'c 39.1 310 0,0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 2.0 0.6 0.0 3.1 0.9 0.0 2.8 0.2 0,0 9.3 1.5 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 0.7 2.9 0.4 1.7 4.4 0.0 2.5 1,15 4.0 0-5 3.1 0:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 39,5 14A 0.0 39.8 14.6 4,0 3'8.2 26.4 0.0 48.4 34.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D 13 D C D C Appfcauh Vol, veb!h 594 A 9N A 444 A 349 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 17.5 19.1 33.0 35.3 Approach LOS B B C D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 22.1 10.5 42.0 12.7 15.5 8.5 44.01 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.7 60.3 11.5 34.5 15.5 40.5 E.5 39.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 2.9 5.7 5.9 10,U 7.7 9.1 J.8 14.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.4 0.2 3.5 0.5 2.8 0.0 5.8 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 218 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2124 AM WO 2: Henry St & Our -,en Kaahur-laaPLI HWY 1V12.202'I -'I' t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M tt r tlt 0 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 10T 418 124 57 683 507 146 337 47 403 339 Future Volume (vph) 107 418 124 57 683 507 146 337 47 403 339 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Porro Split NA Psrm Split NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 Qetectof Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 2 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s} 9.5 30.5 30,5 9,5 30.3 30.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.3 35,5 Total Split (s) 12.0 36.8 367 9 10.1 35.0 35.0 07.4 37.0 37,4 36.0 36-,0 Total SPI rt(%) 10.0% 30.8% 30,13% 8.4% 29.2% 29.29 30.8% 30.8°. 30.8% 30,0%, 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tatar Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None flax Max None Ncne None None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.4 35.1 35.1 5.7 39.0 31.0 18.1 18.1 18.1 25.0 25.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.07 0.35 0.35 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.25 0.25 vie Ratio 0.48 0.37 0.21 0.31 0.67 0.62 0.48 0.54 0.14 0.75 073 Control Delay 55.3 28.7 6.5 54.3 35.6 6.7 43.0 41.9 1.1 47.9 39.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 D.0 0.0 0,0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.3 2&.7 6.5 54,3 35.8 6.7 43.4 41.9 1.1 47.8 39,4 LOS E C A D D A D a A D D App, cauh Letay 28.8 24.8 38.6 42.0 Approach LOS C C 1} I) Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 124 Actuated Cycle Length: 99.8 Natural Cyde: 115 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We RaW-. 0.75 Inteisecllon Signal Relay: 32.3 Intersectlan LOS: C Intersection Capacity U61ization 69,8¢A ICU Level of SeNcc C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits r�and Phases: 2: HenrySt & Queen Kwhmanu Hwy J070 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysts 2024 AM WO 2. Henry St & Queer! Kaahurnalnu Hwy 11;12.202'l "arneiit EBL EBT EBR 'WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBFT Dane Configurations M +t r )I 'f'� 1 4+ r 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 107 418 124 57 683 507 146 337 47 403 339 124 Future Volume (vph) 107 413 124 57 683 507 146 337 47 403 339 124 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 1900 19M 1900 19M 3900 19N 1900 190€1 19M 1900 Total Lost lime (s) 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane 4ttil. Factcr 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.OU, Q.91 9.81 1.00 0.91 0,91 Frpb, ped; bikes 1.00 1.00 D.99 1,00 1,00 0.99 1.44 1.0ti 0,99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pedtbikes 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 i,00 Frt I M 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1,00 0.97 Flt Pro3ecled 0,95 1,00 1. DO 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1,021} UQ 0.95 X0,99 Said, Flaw (p;otf 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1467 1595 3175 FR Permitted 9.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.09 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd, Flg4 (perrr) 3099 3282 1515 3303 3406 1549 1.564 3348 1487 t595 3175 Peal[ -hour factor, PHF 0.97 0-97 11.97 9.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97+ 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 110 431 128 59 704 523 151 347 48 415 349 128 RTOR Reductkx� (0) 0 0 83 0 0 355 0 0 39 0 20 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 110 431 45 59 704 167 136 362 9 299 573 0 Confl. Peds. (#(hr) 2 2 4 3 3 4 Confl, Bikes (thr) 1 Heavy Vehlcles °Ya 13% 10% 5% 6% 6% 3% 5A 3% 7% 3% 4% 51!0 Turn Type Pint NA Perm Prot NA Perm spit NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 S 2 Actuated Green. G (s} 7.4 35.1 35.1 4.3 32.0 32.0 13.1 18.1 18.1 25.0 25.0 Effective Green, g (s) 7.4 35.1 35.1 4,3 32.0 32.0 18.1 18.21 18.1 25.0 25.0 Actuated g C natio 0.07 0.35 0.35 0,04 0,32 0.32 0.18 0,18 0118 0125 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 41.5 V'ehde Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 228 1146 529 141 1084 492 281 602 267 396 789 v+s Ratio Prot c0.04 c0.13 0.02 cO.21 0.09 GO. 11 c0.19 0.18 Vs Ratio Perm CSM 0.11 0.01 Oc: Ratio 0,48 0.38 HE 9,42 0.65 0.34 0.48 0.60 0,03 0.76 0.73 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 44.7 24.5 21,9 46.9 219.4 26,2 37,0 37,9 X0 34.9 34.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.30 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0Q 1.00 1.00 Inc'emental Delay, d2 1.6 0.9 0.3 2.0 3.0 1-9 1,3 1.7 O.C. 3.0 3.4 Delay (s) 46.3 25.4 22.2 48.9 32,4 28.0 35.3 39.6 34.0 42.9 38.0 Le'v'el of Service D C C D C C D D C D D Apprua; th Delay (sl 23.3 31.4 38,8 39.6 Approach LA'S C C D D Intarsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 34.1 HCM M Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 4.65 Actuated C be Length (s-) tCIO. 5 Sum of lost erne tsj 18,p Intamecflon Capacity Utiliaztim 69.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period train) 15 c Critical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2024, AM WO I Hualalai Rd 4North) 1 c12.2n21 Intersection Int DelFy. siveh 10.3 Movement EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Conrigurations 798.8 0 r B t HCM 95th °dile 0(vah) 0.9 Traffic Vol, vehrh 44 54 156 1132 903 30 Future Vol, vehlh 44 54 156 11132 903 30 CeniticOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 D 1 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channeiazed - Free - None - YAd Storage Length 140 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Sturager # D - - 0 D Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor g3 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 MAvint Flow 47 58 168 1217 971 32 MajorftvT Minex2 Majcrl k1afnr2 Conflicting Flovu AJI 2525 972 - Stage 1 S72 - - - - Stage 2 1553 - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42 4.12 Critical t4dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Maneuver -31 0 709 - - Stage 1 367 0 - - Slage 2 192 0 Platoon blocied, % - - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver -24 - 70 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar - 24 - - - - - Stage 1 280 Stage 2 192 Appromh E NO 8B HCM Contr+oi Delay, s$198.8 1.4 4 HCM LOS F Minor LarifelMabr Mvmt NIBL NBT ESUI E=6iW 33T SE IR Capacity (vehh) 708 - 24 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio D.237 - 9.971 - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 11.7 798.8 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F it - - HCM 95th °dile 0(vah) 0.9 - 6.9 Nctft Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Ara] major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 FI C IVI 6th TWSC 2C24, AM WO 4; Hualaiai Rd (South) 1 c12.2021 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h I. Movement WBL WBIR NBT NBR SBL SBT Ldno Gonligurations 0 12.8 - r T4 A $ - }j t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 9 140 1146 15 73 879 Future Vol, vehlh 0 140 1146 15 73 879 ConiticOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Ykdd - None Storage Langlh fl 0 Veh in Mediar9 Starager # 0 - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 Peale Hour Faclor k 93 83 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 6 5 MAvinl Flow 10 151 1232 16 7B 945 Major"Oa Minorl Majorl MajoI Conflicting Flovu PJI 234'1 0 0 12:32 0 Stage 1 12417 - - - - - Stage 2 110t - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 - - 4.16 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow -up Hdwy 3.518 - - - ?-.254 - Pol CW1 Mar mver 44 0 - - 552 - Stage 1 273 0 - - 5lage 2 318 0 _ _ - _ Platoon bluGied, ''k - - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver 34 - - - 552 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuvar 34 - - - - - Stage 1 273 Slage 2 273 Approach m NO HGM Control Delay, s 148.6 0 1 HCM LOS F mhor Corm major MM vmt Nf NBRWBLAlWBLrk2 SBL SBT Capacity (vehh) - - 34 - 552 - HGM Lane V.'C Rat#o - - 0.285 - 0.142 - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 148,6 0 12.8 - HCtwf Lane LDS - IF A $ - HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 19 - D.5 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Timings 2124 AM WO 5; Puapuaanui St 11!12.202'I Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SEIR Lane Configuratians t r I t t '� + r Traffic Volume (vph) 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 841 24 43 784 68 Future Volume (vph) 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 841 24 43 780 fib Turn Type Perm NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+p# NA Perm prn+pt NA Penn Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 5 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 6 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 215 22.5 9.5 40.a 48,0 9.5 48,Q 48,0 Total SPI it(%) 26.1% 28.1" 26.1% 28.1% 28.1° 26.1% 11.904 60.1?°!n 160.0% 11.9% CO.0% 60.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Nene None None None Nor Max Max None Max Max Apt Eflut Green (s) 15.8 15.6 15.$ 15,6 15.6 15Z 49.1 46,2 46.2 48.2 44.3 44.3 Actuated grC Ratio 0.20 4.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.64 0.61 0.61 0.63 0.5a 0.58 vie Ratio 0.77 0.03 0.21 0.41 0.17 0.34 0.39 0.84 0.03 0.17 0.79 0.06 Control Delay 49.5 24.4 8.1 31,5 26.4 7.2 8.9 21.2 0.0 6.3 21.4 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 OA 0,0 13.0 Total Do42y 49.5 24.4 6,1 31.5 26,4 7,2 8.9 21.2 0.0 f.3 21.4 2,2 LOS D C A C C A A C A A G A App, cauh Deiay 37.4 19.5 19,4 19.1 Approach LOS 1) 8 B B Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cyde Length: 76.3 Natural Cycle: 80 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum ulc Ratio: 0.80 Inteisectlan Signal delay; 21.4 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter don Capacity Utilization 77,0% ICI Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Sun-lmi+ary 2024 AM WO 5; Puapulaanui St 11!12.202'I ---w , .- *� I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL VVFBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t r I t + t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 841 24 43 78C 66 Future Volume ;vehih) 193 9 75 110+ 59 140 1'04 841 24 43 7B0 68 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.DO 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1870 1$70 1870 1870 1850 1870 1870 1826 187 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 310 10 D 117 64 0 113 895 0 46 530 0 Peak Hour Factor €,1.92 0.92 0.D2 0.94 0,92 0.94 0.92 0.94 D,94 0.94 0,94 0,92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 5 2 Gap, vehlh 333 389 379 369 324 1072 279 1022- 022Arriv€ ArriveOn Green 0.21 0.21 0.00 0,21 0.21 0.00 0.06 0.58 UOQ Q.04 0.55 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1338 1870 1585 1405 1870 1585 1751 1856 1555 1751 1826 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 210 10 G 117 54 D 113 895 0 46 830 0 Grp Sat F7ovv(s),vehlhlln 1338 1870 1585 1405 1876 1585 1781 185$ 1585 1781 1826 1555 0 Serve{s_s), s 11.9 0.3 Q.G 5.6 2.2 0.0 2.0 30.6 U-0 0.8 2815 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 14.1 0.3 0.0 8.0 2,2 0.0 2.0 30.6 OX 0.8 28.5 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veA 333 389 379 389 324 1072 2n 1022 VJC Ratio(X) 0.63 0.03 D.31 0.16 0,35 0.83 0.16 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 365 433 412 433 334 1072 322 1022 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.G0 1.00 1.00 1.110 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.019 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 31,0 24.5 0.0 26.9 252 0.0 12.1 13.4 0,0' 12.3 13.8 0.0 her Delay (d2). siveh 3.0 0.0 0.4 4.5 0.2 0.0 0.6 7.7 0,0 0.3 7.0 0.19 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1) .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.0 0.1 0.0 1.9 1,0 0.4 0.7 13,1 0.0 0.3 12.1 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 34.0 24.5 0.0 27.3 25.4 0.0 13.0 21.1 0.0 12.6 20.9 0.0 LnGrp Los C C C C B C B C Apprcauh Vol, vett h 220 A 181 A 10D5 A 876 A Approach Delay, s�veh 33.6 26.7 2r7.2 20.4 Approach LOS C C C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 '# a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7b 49.4 20.1 9.1 48.0 20.7 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 1.5 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.0 43.5 1810 5.0 43.5 I&D Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 1.8 32.6 16.1 4,0 30.5 8.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 5.0 0.1 0,0 5.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 22,1 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- arse;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2024, AM WO 6, Kuakini Street 1 c12.2021 Intersection ht FlyY s.veh n 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions W02, r Conllic6ng Flaw AJI t t Stage 1 Traffic Vol, v&Vh 0 159 602 900 905 0 Future Vol, vehlh 0 159 602 900 905 0 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - YWd Storage Lcnglh 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 4 2 5 5 7 PAvint Flow 0 1171 547 968 973 0 MajorlKm W02, MOM Mejo'l Conllic6ng Flaw AJI 3235 - 973 0 - 0 Stage 1 073 - - - - Stage 2 2262 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42 4.12 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 - Pol CW1 Maneuver 11 0 709 - - - Stage 1 366 0 - - Slage 2 84 0 Platoon bluGied,'k - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1 - 709 - - - tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar t - Stage 1 32 Stage 2 84 . Approach m NO SS HGM Control Delay, s 0 16.1 0 HCM LOS A MinorLanielftx Mvml NBL NBT EBLra1 EBLn2 5BT SBR Capacity (vehh) 709- HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0.913 - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 40.2 - 0 0 HGNI Lane LDS € - A A - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) 12.2 - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Timings 2124 AM WO T; Lake Street 11112.202'1 Large Group EBI_ EBT VML 'WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT S3R Lane Configuratians I 1� 1i T4 ' + T Traffic Volume (vph) 278 48 59 36 33 918 55 114 769 142 Future Volume (vph) 278 48 fig 36 33 918 55 180 769 142 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 4 Permitbad Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectcx Phase 4 4 8 a 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) .22.5 22.5 2Z5 2Z5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (8) 25.2 25.2 22.5 22,5 9,5 68.3 69.3 1.3.4 72.8 72.8 Total SPI int(%) 19A% 19.4" 17.3% 17.3% 7.30 53.3% 53.3% 10.F/o 56.0% 56.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -lied Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{1 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tatar Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Gptirnlze? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Nene Norge None Max. Max None Max Max Apt Eftct Green (s) 20.7 .20.7 18.0 1 H 69.8 664.8 E4.8 77.2 72.1 72.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.14 0.14 0.54 0.50 0.50 0.59 0.55 0,55 vie Ratio 1.05 0.40 0.33 1.04 0.17 1.05 0.07 1.94 0.800 0.16 Central Delay 120.4 34.4 54.2 93.6 13.0 76.8 1.5 113.4 31.5 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 O.6 0.0 L,0 Total Delay 120.4 34.4 $4.2 93.6 13.0 7{ .0 1.5 113,4 31,5 4.8 LOS F C a F B E A F C A Apprcauh De! ay 95.0 86,9 70.6 40.2 Approaeh LOS ;F F ER 13 Intersedan Summa Cycle Lenglih: 134 Actuated Cycle Length; 130 Natural Cycle: 130 Control Ty:ae: Semi Act-Llncoord N'laximum ulc Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 64.9 Intersectlon LOS E Inter tion Capacity 1 JUlizatioD 107.E ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Lako tree" 01 t8 05 4 DE 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page, 13 HOIVI 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 AM WO T; Lako Street 11:12:2`]21 I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t r T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 278 48 59 59 36 296 33 918 55 160 769 141 Future Volume ;vehih) 278 46 69 69 36 296 33 918 55 160 769 142 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 18561 1870 1870 1870 1870 1449 18? 1 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 296 51 0 73 38 0 35 977 0 170 318 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0!94 0,94 D.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap, vehlh 314 334 105 111 282 1032 196 1080 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.06 0.06 •0.110 0.03 0.55 O.OQ Q.05 0,58 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 296 51 G 73 38 0 35 977 C 170 818 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1370 1560 1725 1856 1585 0 Serves -s), s 19.3 2.7 Q.G 4.8 2.3 0.0 1,0 57.5 0.0 4.9 38,7 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 19.3 2.7 0.0 4.8 23 0.0 1.0 57.5 4.17 4,9 38.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 O.DG 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehih 314 330 145 111 282 1032 198 two VJC Ratio(X) 0.94 0.15 0.69 0.34 0.12 0.95 0,66 01.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 314 330 271 287 306 1032 221 1080 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.110 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), even 47.5 40.9 (1.0 54.2 b3.0 0.0 16.1 24.7 U 27.1 1$.4 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 35.8 0.2 4,0 7.9 1.8 0.0 G.2 17.8 0.0 25.6 6.0 0.13 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 17.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 11,6 1.3 0,0 23 1.1 0.0 0.4 29.1 0,0 4.0 17.2 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 83.6 41.2 0.0 52,1 54.8 0.0 16.3 42.4 0.0 527 23.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D E D B D D C Apprcauh Vol, veb!h 347 A 111 A 1012 A 988 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 77.1 59.6 41.5 28.4 Approach LOS E E D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.4 69.3 25.2 7.9 72,8 11.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8.5 64.8 4,7 5.0 618.3 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (9_c+11), s 5,9 59.5 21,3 3.0 40.7 6.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 3.2 U 0.0 0,9 0.2 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 42.1 HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Phgh 15 Timings 2024 AM WO 8, Kamehamehe III Read & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 11112!2021 Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NBT 8BL SET Lane CDnfiguratians 4 r 4:4 1 J � + Traffic Volume (vph) 5 26 12 76 562 16 490 Future Volume (vph) 5 26 12 Ifs 562 16 u90 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permibd Phases 2 Qetectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 95 23.5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.5 30.5 30,0 11.0 35.0 8.5 315 Total SPI rt(%) 29.0°la 29.E 28.6% 10.5% 33.3% 9.0% 31.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Ad! -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Gptirnlze? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Ncne None Max None Max Act Effut Green (s) 19.7 13.7 7.1 61 39.4 5.1 29,8 Actuated grO Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.10 0.09 0.56 0.07 0.42 vie Ratio 0,59 0.08 a25 0,53 0.62 0.13 0.61 Contra! Delay 34.6 0.4 27.3 49.1 19,4 38.4 17.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 07 0 6.0 0.0 0,0 o.0 Total aolay 34.6 0.4 27.3 49.1 15,4 38,4 17,4 LOS C A C D E ID B App, cauh Le!ay 30.4 27.3 22.9 17.8 Approach LOS C C 0 8 Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglth:105 Actuated Cycle Length: 70,7 Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum u c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay; 21.5 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter con Capacity Utilizalion 62.7°A ILLI Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 #its and Phases: 6. Kamenarneha Ill Koaa & {ween Nal-vmlanu HW at 06 X33 T 4 0 tOS 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 16 HGM 6th Signalized Ir,ttorsectien SUn-trna{y 2024 AM WO 8; Kanieharneha 11) Read & QUe(-;n Kaahurnanu Hwy 11.12-2021 -_* -Ii --- I'4layament EBL DBT EBF WBL WBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SOR Lane Configurations 4 r :k V 1 +T Traffic Volume (vehfh) 179 5 26 16 12 17 76 552 15 16 490 320 Future Volume ;vehih) 179 5 25 16 12 17 76 562 15 16 490 320 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.04 0.9ta 1_CIO 0,85 1,00 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.40 1.010 1.D0 1,00 1,100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1811 1870 1722 1874 1751 1796 1752 1011 1870 1870 1811 1811 Adj Row Rate,. vehlh 192 5 D 17 13 1a 82 604 1G 17 527 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0X 0.93 0,93 0,93 0.93 1151.93 0,93 0.93 0,93 D.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 2 12 i a 7 10 6 2 2 G 6 Cep. vehlh 260 7 26 20 27 102 1577 23 36 1579 Arrive On Gruen 0.15 0.15 O.DO 0,05 0.05 17.05 0.06 0.50 a,50 0.02 D.45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1735 45 1459 570 436 604 1665 1755 46 1781 3532 0 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 197 0 D 48 0 D 82 D 620 17 527 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1783 0 1459 1611 0 0 1668 0 1802 1781 1721 0 Q Serve{sus}, s t3.T 0.17 0.0 1,8 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 16.6 0.13 5.2 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 6.7 O'D 0.0 1.9 0,0 0.0 3.1 0.0 16.6 0.6 6,2 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.04 0.35 0.37 1.00 0.03 1.00 0 -CIO L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh h 26T 0 73 0 0 102 a 901 36 1579 VJC Ratio(X) 0.74 HO 0.66 0.06 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.69 0,47 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 734 0 6501 0 0 172 0 901 141 1579 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.(10 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1100 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 25.7 0.0 (1.0 29.7 0.0 10.0 29.3 0.0 12.0 30.6 10,9 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 4.0 0.0 0,D 9,8 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 4.3 9.0 0.6 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 u.0 0.0 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 3,0 0.0 0,0 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.5 0,0 6.Q 0.3 2.0 0,0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 29.6 0.0 0.0 39.5 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 1£.3 39.7 11.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Appfcauh Vol, veli h 197 A 48 7D2 544 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 29.6 a9.5 19.4 12.4 Approach LOS C D B B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 5 PAs Duration ('G+Y+Rc), s 14.0 8.4 33.5 7.3 5.8 36.1 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 6.5 2H 25.5 5.0 30.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 8.7 5.1 8.2 3.9 2.6 18.6 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 1.0 0.0 3.1 0.2 0.0 3.0 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay HChA 6th LOS 0 N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intersect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 Tin7ir(lS 2024 PM "10 t Pc3laiii Rd & CSI-cotI Ka&lW,1ial1U I f1,Vy 1 , If 2K --* 4\ t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt r ' +� ++ r ' +t r Traffic Volume (vph) X0 978 503 226 61I2 56 227 283 263 54 313 107 Future Volume (vph) 260 976 503 226 682 5E 217 283 263 54 313 107 Turn Type Prat NA berm Prot NA Perm ?rot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 4 8 2 6 Qetectc,r Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum '01 (s) 9,5 38.5 38.5 9,5 35,5 U.5 9.5 42.5 42,6 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 19,9 44.0 44,0 15,0 40,1 40,1 15.0 48.2 46,';, 13.8 44,0 44.0 Total SPI it(%) 16.6% 36.7% 36.7°1 13.3% 33.4% 33A% 13.3% 38.5°rn 38.5% 11.F% 36.7% 36.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) O.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max Nave Ncne None Norio None None Act Effct Green (s) 12.3 40.0 40.0 10.7 38.4 38.4 10.6 22.4 22.4 7.9 17.2 17.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0,13 0.41 0.41 0,11 0.40 0,40 0.11 0,23 0.23 0.O8 0,18 6,18 role Ratio 0.61 0.69 0.53 0.61 0;51 0.06 O.62 4.35 0,47 0.38 O.51 O.30 Control Delay 48,0 28.4 10.0 50.3 26.0 1.8 50.5 33.0 6.O 53.2 35,2 8,2 Queue Delay 0,6 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 t}.0 0.4 0.0 L,O 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 45,0 28.4 10.0 50,3 26.0 1.B 513,5 3310 6,6 53.2 38.2 8,2 LOS D C B D C A 0 rJ A D D A App, cauh Letay 26.0 30.3 29,2 33,2 Apprc,auh LOS C 0 C C Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 124 Actuated Cycle Length; 96.9 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0.69 Inteisectlan Signal Delay; 28.5 Intersectlan LOS- C Intersection Capacity Utilizalion 66.61A ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1; Palani Rd & Queen Kaahurnanu Hwy \0131 102 fo4, I --*rJ, 05 06 -..407 Citi 5.00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection SUn-lrna{y 20124 PM WO 1, Palani Rd & Queen KaahUn�anti [Avvy 11:12.2921 I I'4layarnerrt EBL EBT EBR WOL WBT VVBR NEL NBT NBR SEL SBT SER Lane Configurations �1 tt r )I tt ' ++ t+ r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 2Gil 978 503 226 682 56 227 283 263 54 313 107 Future Volume ;wehih) 266 978 503 226 682 56 227 283 263 54 313 107 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.Ca 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,60 1.90 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1855 1856 1670 1870 1041 1870 1866 1870 1870 1870 1870 1879 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 265 996 0 231 696 0 232 289 0 55 319 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 D.08 0,98 0,98 0,98 198 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,98 0,98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 3 3 2 i 4 2 3 2 2 2 2 C Gap,vehl11 357 1635 316 1577 316 678 76 502 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.46 {1.00 0.09 0,45 •D.00 0.09 0.19 UQ 0.04 -D.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3428 3526 1585 3456 3497 1585 3428 3554 1656 1781 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 265 998 0 231 696 0 232 289 0 55 319 0 Grp Bat F10w(s),veh!hiln 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 15H 1714 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 0 Serves -s), s 6.4 18_D 0.0 5.5 11.5 0.0 5.6 6.1 9.0 2.6 7.2 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 6,4 18.0 0,0 5.5 11.6 0.0 5.6 6.1 4.0 2.6 7.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.170 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lar1e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 357 1635 316 3577 316 678 76 502 VJC Ratio(X) 0.74 0.61 0,73 044 0.73 0.43 0.72 0 64 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 620 1635 467 1577 463 1740 194 1£48 1-10M Platoon Ratic 1.00 1.00 1,x 1,00 1.00 1.110 1.Q0 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 37.0 17.1 0.0 37.7 16.0 0.0 37,6 30.4 0,0 40.3 34,5 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 3.0 1.7 0.0 3.3 0.9 0.0 3.3 0.4 0,0 12.1 1.3 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.1) .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehrfln 27 7.1 0.0 2,4 4.5 0.4 2.5 2.6 0.0 1.4 3.1 0:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 40.1 18.8 0.0 49.9 16.9 0.0 41.0 30.8 0.0 52.4 33..8 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D D Approauh Vol, vett h 1263 A 927 A 521 A 374 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 23.3 22.9 35.3 38.3 Approach LOS C C D L Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 $ Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 20.8 12.3 44.0 12.4 16.5 13A 42.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 9.3 413 11.5 39.5 11.5 39.5 15A 35,6. Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 4,0 8.1 7.5 20.0 7.6 9.2 8.4 13.6 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 2.0 0.3 8.9 0.3 2,2 44 43 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 27,1} HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal culatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2024 PM WO 2; Henry St & Our -,en Kaahumanu Hwy 1V12.202'I Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL SK Lane CDnfiguratians �1 tt r tt 1 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 772 291 80 636 348 126 318 38 388 342 Future Volume (vph) 190 772 291 80 636 348 126 318 38 388 342 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prot NA Pena Split NA Perm SO A NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2. Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 a a 2 2 2 & 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9.5 30.5 30,5 9,5 30,5 30.5 35,5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35,5 Total Split (s) 14,0 36.0 360,0 19.0 32.0 32,0 37,0 37.0 37,0 37.0 37,0 Total SPI ft 11.7% 30.D"13 30.0% 8.3% 26.7% 261.7% 30.8% 30.8°. 318% 30.8% 30.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3,5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.4 160 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 LeadLag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Nene Max Max None Ncne None None None ActEflutGreen (s) 9.3 34.1 34,1 16 28.0 2&,0 17,3 IT3 17.3 26.2 26.2 Actuated grO Ratio 0.09 0.34 D.34 0.06 0,28 0,28 0.17 0,17 0.17 0.26 0.26 vie Rabo 0.62 0.65 0,44 0:42 0,66 0.51 0.42 0.57 0.11 0.74 0,70 Control Delay 55.1 33.7 5,6 5a,3 .37.5 6,7 41.8 41.7 0.7 45.9 35.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,4 D.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 55,1 33.7 5.0 56.3 37.5 6,7 41,8 41,7 0.7 45.8 35.1 LOS E C A E D A 0 D A D D App, cauh Decay .30.4 28.9 38.5 38.8 Approe5h LOS C 0 1) I) Intersection Summa Cycle Lei glih: 124 Actuated Cycle Length; 99.1 Natural Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum vlc Rato: 0.74 Inteiseclion Signal Delay: 33.1 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intention Capaci#y Utilization 73,4% ILLI Level of 5eNce D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits rnand Phases: 2: HenrySt & Queen l�anu H 31 TJ� --1434 C0 7 03 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2024 PM WO 2. Henry St & Queer! Kaahumanu Hwy 11112-2021 --I' ---W 41t I' oamerrt EEL EBT EBR WOL VVBT 11UBR NBL NBT NBR SBL W SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt Or )) tt 2 2 4+ ' 6 04 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 772 291 80 936 348 126 318 38 388 342. 190 Future Volume (vph) 190 772 291 80 636 348 126 318 38 388 342 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 1900 1900 1900 19M 1900 1900 1900 190€7 1800 1900 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Lane Ubl. Factor 9.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Q.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 3.6 Frpb, ped -bikes 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 0.99 1.44 1.90 0,98 1.00 -199 270 Flpb, peftikes 1M 1.00 1,04 1100 1,90 1.00 1.00 1.04 1,00 1,00 1.0 GO.10 Frt I M 1.00 0.95 1.00 1,1017 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 0,00 Flt Proteded 4,9.5 1,00 1. DO 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1,00 1.G0 0.95 0,99 0.78 Saud, Flaw (p;otf 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1510 3195 33.3 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.04 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Inc-ernental Delay, d2 Setd, Flow {Gerrnf 3335 3539 15$3 3433 3471 1561 1.595 3382 1537 1917 3195 47.5 Paas[ -hour IaCtor, U'H'F 0.98 0.98 D.98 9.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 D.98 0.98 0.9a 0.98 Adj. Flow(vph) 1R4 786 297 82 649 355 129 324 39 398 349 194 RTOR Reductknr (vph) 0 0 196 0 0 252 0 0 32 0 40 0 Lane Group Flow (vphl 194 788 101 82 649 103 116 337 7 317 582 0 Gonfl, Peds. (Nhr} 1 1 4 7 7 4 Confl. Bikes (A'hr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehlctes (NO 5% 21% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2 iM 2~i',• 2% Turn Type Prat NA pear Prct NA Perim split NA Perin 3o ". NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 S Actuated Green, G (s} 9.3 34.1 34.1 4.3 29.1 29.1 17.3 17.3 17.3 26.2 26.2' Effective Green, g (s) 9.3 34.1 34.1 4,3 29.1 29.1 17.3 17.3 17.3 26-2 26,2 Actuated g C Raga 0,09 0.34 0.34 0,04 0.29 'J. 0-17 0.17 i1, 17 0,26 0.2b Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 41.5 Verde Extension_ 3.4 3'.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.0 3. 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lana Grp Cap (vphf 310 1208 54G 147 1011 .15.1 270 5 a 5 2,96 422 8:37 V+s Ratio Prat cO.ID6 X0.22 0.02 0.19 0.%1J GO.10 c0.20 0.18 Vs Ratio Perm HE 0.07 0,00 v.'c Ratio 0.63 13.65 0.19 9.56 0,64 0,23 4.42 0.58 0,03 0.78 0.70 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 43.6 27.9 23.2 46.9 30.9 26,9 36.8 37,9 34.3 33.9 33.3 Progression Factor 1. 1.00 1.30 1.114 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Ufo 1.00 7.00 Inc-ernental Delay, d2 3.9 2_7 0.8 4.,i 3.1 1.2 1,0 1A 9,c 7.4 2.5 Delay (s) 47.5 30.6 219 51.4 34,0 28.0 37.9 39.3 34,3 41.2 35,8 Level of Service D C C 1) C C 0 D C D D Appfuauh Delay i t 31.6 33,4 38.6 37.6 Approach LOS C C L' D tntatsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 34.5 HCM 7440 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 4.68 Actuated Cycle Length (s-) 99.9 Sum of lost tirna IN 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utiliaatim 73.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysts Period tmin) 15 c Grttical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2024, PM WO I Hualalai Rd 4North) 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht 11"09Y s.veh 1.3 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT St LdnC- Gon figural ions - 204.8 0 r B t t r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 14 83 83 1072 1175 17 Future Vol, vehih 1fl 83 83 11072 117: 17 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 4 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Norge - YWd Storage Length 144 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % fl - - 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 PAvint Flow 10 85 86 1105 1211 18 Majo!- rnr Mir1cx2 Majorl Majo4 Conflicting Flovu PJI 2488 1211 0 - 0 Stage 1 1211 - - - - - Stage 2 1 277 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 8.42 4.12 - - Critical Crit cal t4dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Mammar 32 0 576 Stage 1 282 0 - - Slage 2 262 0 - Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 27 - 576 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 27 - - - - - Stage 1 240 Stage 2 262 Approach Fs No 813 HCM Control Delay, s 204,E 0.9 U HCM LOS F Mlrtior Uriie major vvmf NBL NBT EBLn1 EBW 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 576 - 27 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0. W - 0.382 - - - MGM Control Delay (s) 12.3 - 204.8 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F it - - FI M 95th %file 0(veh) 0.5 - 1.2 - - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2X324, PM WO 4; Hualaiai Rd (South) 1 c12.2n21 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h 1.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT LdnC- Gonligurations 0 11,7 - r 1 A B - H M 95th %file 0(veh) + Traffic Vol, vchrh 14 71 1089 4 61 1193 Future Vol, vehlh 14 71 1089 4 61 1198 ConiticOng Peds, Or 0 0 a 0 0 0 Sign Control Slop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Yield - None Storage Langlh 0 0 - - 0 - Veh in Median Starager # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 Peale Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 MAvinl Flow 14 73 1123 4 63 1235 MajorfMio mor Wpm MOM WA .1 Conflicting Flow' AJI 2486 - 0 0 1173 0 Stage 1 1125 - - - - - Stage 2 1351 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.47 - - 4.18 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.47 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.47 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 - - - 2.272 - Pol Cap -1 Mammar 31 0 - - 600 - Stage 1 393 0 - - 5lage 2 233 0 Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 2S - - - 600 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuver 28 - Stage 1 303 Slage 2 209 Approach ` A� NO SB HGM Control Delay, s 228.8 0 0.6 HCM LOS F Mhor LarWmajor MMlvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLrr2 SOL SBT Capacity (vWh) - - 28 - 600 - HGM Lane V.'C Rat#o - 0.515 - 0.105 - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 228,8 0 11,7 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F A B - H M 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1.6 - 0.3 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 8 Timings 2024 PM WO 5; Puapt_laanui St 1V12.202'I ---W t -01 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT• SBIR Lane CDnfiguratians + r t r V + ' ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 199 23 115 50 23 104 105 7T3 58 142 873 100 Future Volume (vph) 199 23 116 50 23 104 105 773 58 142 973 100 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+p# NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 a 8 2 2 6 6 Detectod Phase 4 4 4 8 $ 8 5 2 2 1 n 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimus Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 57.9 57,9 9.6 58,0 58,0 Total SPI it(%) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0° 25.0% 10.6114 64.3°7n 64.3% 10.7% 84.4% 64.4% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse None None Noire None Nor Max Max None Max Max Aat Eftct Green (s) 18.8 16.6 16.E 16,6 16.6 16.6 56.4 53.4 83.4 58.6 53.5 53.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.66 0.60 0.60 0.66 0.60 0.60 rile Ratio 0,84 0.07 0.32 0.20 0,07 0.29 0.61 0.72 O} 06 0.44 0.89 0.11 Control Delay 62.6 30.0 8.3 32.4 30.0 8.6 25.2 17.3 1.7 8.8 27.7 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 0.0 0 0 0.0 4.0 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total delay 62.6 30.0 8.3 32.4 30.0 8.5 25,2 17.3 1.7 8,8 27.7 1.9 LOS E C A C G A C B A A C A App, cauh Letay 41.7 18.2 17.3 23.3 Approeah LOS 1] S S C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length; 88.6 Natural Cyde: 90 Control Type; Semi Act-13ncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: 0.89 Intersecllan Signal delay; 23.3 Interseatlan LOIS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 86,011,E ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases:5. Pua aanui 8t } 0i 1 o2 �iF3 7 06 0;3 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 H M 6th Signalized Intcorsection SUn-ima{y 2024 PM WO 5; Puapulaanui St 11:12.2021 I'4layament EBS. EBT EBR '4VBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t iif I I t ji' � + r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 199 23 116 50 23 104 145 773 58 142 973 100 Future Volume {vehih) 199 23 116 50 23 104 105 773 58 142 973 1 D0 initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.D0 1,00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.a4 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1870 1$70 1826 1810 1856 1541 1870 1870 1870, Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 216 25 0 52 25 0 114 797 0 146 1003 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.+92 0.92 0.97 0,92 0,97 0.92 0,97 0,97 0.97 0,97 D,92 Percent Heavy Veh, °!c 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 3 4 2 £ 2 Gap,vehi11 326 350 326 350 262 1122 389 1135 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.00 0,10 0.19 •0.00 0.05 0.60 100 Q.06 0.61 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 13W 1870 1585 1386 3870 1547 1751 1856 1560 1751 1670 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vef fh 216 25 G 52 25 0 114 797 0 146 1003 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1386 1870 1585 1386 18701 1547 1751 1856 1560 1781 1870 1555 Q Serves -s), s 13.4 1.0 D.0 2.8 1.0 0.0 2.1 2513 0.0 2.7 40,1 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 14.4 1.0 0.0 3.8 1.0 0.0 2.1 26.3 0.0 2.7 40.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 UG 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh h 326 380 326 350 262 1122 389 1135 VJC Ratio(X) 0.66 0.07 0.16 0.07 0,44 0.71 0,38 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 349 381 349 381 258 1122 394 1135 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.60 1.00 0.04 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 13.@0 Uniform Delay (d), c'veh 35.5 29.8 0.0 31.1 29.6 0.0 16.9 12.1 0,0 10.8 14,7 0.0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 4.3 0.1 0.0 4.2 0.1 0.0 1.1 3.8 0,0 0.6 10.1 0.0 In!t at Q Del ay(d3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.8 0.4 0.4 1.0 0.4 0.0 1.3 107 0.0 0.9 17.8 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 39.8 29.6 0.0 31.4 29.6 0.0 118.0 15.9 0.0 11.1 24.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C C C B B B C Appfcauh Vol, veil h 241 A 77 A 911 A 1149 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 38.7 30.8 16.2 23.1 Approach LCIS D C B C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.4 57.9 21.0 9.2 58.1 21.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.1 53.4 1H 5.0 53.5 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 4.7 28.3 16.4 4.1 42.1 5.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 6.5 0.1 0.0 6.4 0.1 tntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 22,3 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Phgh 11 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2024, PM WO 6, Kuakini Street 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht FlyY s.veh l.6 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions HCM 95th %file 0(veh) r t + r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 0 325 340 938 1109 0 Future Vol, vehlh 0 328 340 936 1100 0 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - None - '�''reld Storage Length 164 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager 9 0 - - 0 0 - Grade. % fl - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclar 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Veh?cies, % 5 2 2 3 2 6 PAvint Flow 0 332 347 957 1132 0 majorlKha W02, Ma]6r1 Maio, .1 Conllicbng Flaw AJI 2783 - 1132 0 - 0 Stage 1 1132 - - - Stage 2 lfiai - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.48 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.48 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.48 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Mammar 2fl 0 617 - - Stage 1 299 0 - - 5lage 2 166 0 Platoon bluGied, ''k - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 9 - 617 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 9 - - - - Stage 1 131 Stage 2 166 Appfaach m NH 8B HGM Control Delay, s 0 4.8 G HCM LOS A mhor Uriie major M vmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBW 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 617 _ _ _ - HGM Lane V.'C Raba 0.562 - - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 18.1 - 0 D HGNI Lane LDS C - A A - - HCM 95th %file 0(veh) 3.5 - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Timings 2124 PM WO T; Lako Street 11112.202'1 Large Group EBL EBT WBL VV T NBL NBT MR SOL SBT SBR Lane CDnfiguratians 1� ' T4 ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 143 30 52 39 37 888 64 200 1015 188 Future Volume ,wphj 143 31) 52 39 37 888 64 2170 1015 188 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pl NA Perm pm+pt PSA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 6 6 D9tectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (8) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22.5 9,5 69.2 69.2 115,8 75.5 75_5 Total SPI it(%) 17.3% 17.30Ya 1 T 17.3% 7.30 53.29 53.2% 12.2°l* 58.1% 58,1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag € a nlze? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse Nene None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 14.7 14.7 12.5 126 70.0 65.0 65.0 80.9 75.4 75.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.66 0.62 0.62 vie Rabo 0.71 0.33 036 0.83 0;30 0.94 0.08 0.94 0.92 0.19 Control Delay 71.1 76.5 56.4 40.3 15.8 4U 0.2 79.5 36.8 5.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 6.0 17.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 17,0 Total delay 71.1 26.5 55.4 40,3 15.0 46.0 0.2 79.5 36.8 5.7 LOS E C E D B D A E D A Apprcauh Letay 55.4 43.4 41.9 38.7 Approaeh LOS E D D 1) Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 134 Actualao Cycle Length; 121.8 Naturai Cy+de: 130 Control Tyne; ,rtotuated-Unc�ofdinated Nlaximum ulc Ratio: 0.94 Inteisecllan Signal Delay. 41.6 Intersectlon LCIS. D Inter son Capacity Utilization 98,E ICU Level of S-fvico F Analysis Pariad [min) 15 and Phases: 7: Lako Street 05 4 DE 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Pagh 13 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 PM WO T; Lako Street 11112.202'1 ---w '---• I'4layament EBS. EBT EBR >1WBL W'BT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 T V t T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 143 30 48 62 39 218 37 Elsa 64 200 1915 488 Future Volume ;vehih) 143 30 48 62 39 218 37 888 64 200 1015 188 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1°010 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1856 1870 1856 1870 1M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 149 31 0 65 41 0 39 825 0 208 1057 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 4.96 0,96 0,96 0.0 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,90 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 i 5 5 3 3 P 3 2 C Cap, vehlh 182 194 96 99 221 1143 316 1210 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.00 9,05 0,05 9A0 0,43 0.52 J.00 U6 0.65 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1555 1767 1670 1555 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 149 31 G 65 41 D 39 925 0 208 1057 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1K6 1585 1767 1870 1885 Q Serve{s_s), s 9.1 1.7 Cr.O 3.9 2.4 0.0 0.9 41.0 0.0 4.6 50.4 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 9.1 1.7 0.0 3.9 2.4 0.0 0.9 41.9 0.0 4,6 500 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.001 0.00 1.00 b.N 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veW h 182 194 96 99 221 1143 316 1210 VJC Ratio(X) 0.82 0.16 0.68 0.42 0-18 0.81 0,66 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 287 307 292 299 245 1143 388 1210 H C M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 U0 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 (1. DO 1.00 1.001 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 48.2 44.B CIO 51.0 50.3 0.0 17.8 16.1 U 18.9 15,8 0,0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 9.8 0.4 0.0 8.0 2.8 0.0 0.4 6.2 0,0 2.9 8:9 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.5 0_8 0.4 2.0 1.2 0.0 0.5 18.3 0.0 3.1 22.2 4.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 58.0 45.2 0.0 59.0 53.0 O.0 18.2 22.3 0.0 21.8 24.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D E D B C C C Appfcauh Val, vett h 180 A 106 A 964 A 1265 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 55.8 56.7 22.2 24,2 Approach LOS E E C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 72.1 15.9 8.0 75.5 10.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 11.3 64.7 18.0 5.0 71.0 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6A 43.9 11.1 2.9 52.4 5.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.2 7.6 0.3 0.0 8,8 0.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 27,D HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Timings 2024 PM WO 8, Kamehamehe III Read & Queen Kaahumanu Hwy 11112f2021 Large Group EBT EER WBT N'BL NBT 8BL Sl3T Lane Configurations 4 r 4:� T I +�, Traffic Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 579 19 595 Future Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 579 10 595 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot HA Prot NA Protected Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permitlad Phases 2 Qetectof Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 95 23.3 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.5 30.5 30,0 n.6 35.0 9.5 34.7 Total SPI ft 29.0°la 29.D% 28.6% 9.3% 33.3% 9.0% 33.Ylq Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{) 110 1,0 I'D 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Gptirnize? Yes 'des Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Nave Max None Max Act Eff.t Green (s) 20.4 .20.4 6.8 5.5 35.7 5.2 31.6 Actuated grC Ratio 0.27 4.27 0.D9 0,07 0.46 0.07 0.42 vie Ratio 0.74 0.11 0.23 0,52 071 0.16 10.65 Control Delay 36.6 1.0 26.2 54.9 27.0 42.0 21.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Q,0 6.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay Xu 1.0 26.2 54,9 27,0 42,0 21.4 LOS ♦D A C D C Q C Appicauh De!ay 31.8 26,2 29,7 21.8 Approach LOS C C 0 C Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglth:105 Actuated Cycle Length; 75 Natural Cycle: 105 Control TyDe: Semi Act-1lncoord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0..74 Inteisectlan Signal Delay26.4 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter con Capacity LJOiization 71.81, ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 I{ts and Phases; 6: Kamenannehd III Koad & Uueen KaahulImanu tiny as � t 04 07 t08 5.00 pm Baseline Syrnchro 10 Reporl Page 16 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 P'M WO 8; Kamehameha III React & QLIGGn Kaahur 1anU HWY 11112-2021 EBR 1NBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 2 4 r 6 :k a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 1� 8.2 I +T. 6.2 Traffic Volume (vehfh) 325 11 52 7 11 20 64 579 11 19 595 316 Future Volume ;wehth) 325 11 52 7 11 20 64 579 11 19 595 316 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 lnlafseclion Summary 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.G0 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 1856 1767 1B11 1870 1$70 1870 18556 1850 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 342 12 D 7 12 21 67 6l?g 12 20 6.26 0 Peak Hour Factor €,1.95 0.95 a.D5 0,95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0,95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 9 5 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 403 14 11 19 34 90 504 16 41 1476 Arrive On Gruen 0.25 125 OM 0,04 0.04 -7.04 0.05 0.44 0.44 Q.02 •0.42 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1628 57 1535 297 509 890 1767 1813 36 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 354 0 Pr 40 0 0 67 r0 521 20 626 0 Grp Sat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 1685 0 1535 1695 4 0 1767 0 1849 1781 1777 0 0 Servefs-s), s 14.5 0.0 O.Q 1.7 0.9 4.0 2.7 0.0 20.5 0.8 9,1 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 145 0.0 H 1.7 0.0 0.0 2.7 a.0 20.5 0.8 9.1 10 Prop In Lane 0.97 IDD 0.17 0.52 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 418 0 65 0 0 90 D 82f) 41 1476 VJC Ratio(X) 0.85 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0,76 0,49 0.42 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 603 0 505 0 0 129 D 821 123 1476 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.100 1.00 1.00 1.(10 1.40 1.00 1,170 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 X3.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), duel 26.0 0.0 0.0 34.4 0.0 0.0 24.0 0.0 16.0 35.1 15,1 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 7.6 4.0 0.0 9.3 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 6,6 8.9 .19 4.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.C, 0.0 0.0 0.0 u.0 0.4 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.4 0,0 8,7 0.4 3.3 0,0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 33.7 0.0 0.0 43.7 0.0 0.0 46.9 0.0 23.1 44.17 16.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A C D B Appfcauh Vol, veli h 354 A 40 688 646 A Approach Delay, s�ve , 3J.7 43.7 25.7 16.8 Approach LOS C D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.5 8.2 34.7 7.3 6.2 36.7 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4-5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 5.3 30.2 25.5 5.0 30.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 16.5 4.7 11.1 3,7 2.8 22.5 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 1.5 0.0 3.7 0.1 0.0 2.3 lnlafseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 24.4 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 HCM 2010 Roundabout 2324 AM WO Roundabout 3, Hualalai Rd (North) 11109.2021 lrb(wUon Interseclion Dday slveh 125.2 intersection LOS F ApPrWh EB N8 3B Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 M Approach Flaw, vebih 105 1385 10113 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 107 14t2 1062 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh t029 48 171 3lehic;le5 Exiling, vehih 204 1988 1289 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3,186 Pert Vol Cross -.ng Leg, Alh 1 0 0 Ilett Cap Adj 1,000 1,61]0 1.000 Apprc-ach Delay, s.rveh 13.7 161.5 86.7 Approach LOS B F F Lane Lot koLett' De&�natEd Moves LR LT TR ,Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Chmnneiized Lane U01 1.000 1,060 1.000 Crltica111eadwny, s 5.13 5.193 5.193 Entry Flay, vehlh 107 1412 1662 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 404 1077 952 Entry HV Adj F2clor 0"I'V 0.981 0.944 Flow Entry,. vehlh 105 1385 1003 Cap Entry, veh;h 396 1056 899 VIC Ratio 5.265 1.311 1.115 Control Delay, siveh 13,7 161.5 86.7 LOS B F F 951h utile Que4e, veh 1 51 27 5:00 pm Basetine Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout 2024 AM WO Roundabout 4; Hualalai Rd (South) 11109.2021 Irrtiiort Interseclion Dday slveh 83.0 intersection LOS F ApprWh 118 NB BB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circie Lanes 1 1 1 M Approach Flaw, vebih Al 1248 1023 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 164 1275 1075 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh 1257 83 10 3lehic;le5 Exiling, vehih 101 IN2 '1411 Follow -lip Headway, s 3.186 3,186 3.186 Pert Vol Cross -.ng Leg, Alh 0 0 0 Peet Cap AAdj 1,800 1000 UO9 ArpToach Delay, slveh 25.3 125.7 38.5 Approach LOS 0 IF E Lane Lot l fl Left De&i natEd Moves LR TR LT Assumed Moves LR TR LT RT Chmnnelized Lane U01 1.000 1,000 1.000 Critical headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flay, vehlh 164 1275 1075 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 321 1030 1119 Entry HV Adj Faclor 0.1.2 0.979 0.951 Flow Entry,. vehlh 161 1248 1723 Cap Entry, veh;h 316 1018 1064 VEC Ratio 4,510 1.226 01.961 Control Delay, siveh 25.3 1263 38,6 LOS D F E 951h %tile Que4o, veh 3 40 17 5.00 pm BaselinL- Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Roundabout 2024 AM WO Roundabout 6, Kuakini Street 1 1109.2021 llrbfwc on Interseclion Dday slveh 267.2 interseclian LOS F ApplrO h EB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 f 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes, 1 t 1 M Approach Flaw, vebih 171 1615 973 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 176 1676 1022 Vehicles Cireulaling, vehlh t022 0 660 3lehic:le5 Exiling, vehih 660 1200 1016 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3,186 Pert Vol Crass -ng Leg, Alh 0 0 0 PW Cap Adi 1.000 1,0W 1, OU Apprc-ach Delay, s.Iveh 18.4 235.5 353.4 Appfoach LOS C F F Lane Left. Lo Luft' De&�natEd Moves LR LT TR Assumed Moves LR LT TR RTCh nneiized Lane U01 1.000 1,000 1.000 Crlticel Headway, s 5.193 5,193 5.193 Entry Flay, vehlh 178 1676 1322 Cap Entry Lane, vehitr 497 1130 594 Entry HV Adj Faclor 0"i61 0.063 0_W Flow Entry,. vehlh 171 16615 973 Cap Entry, veh;h 391 1089 556 VEC Ratio 4.438 1.483 1.750 Control Delay, siveh 18.4 235.5 363.4 LOS C F F 95th utile Que4e, veh 2 74 58 5:00 pm Basetine Synchro 10 Report Page 3 HCM 2O10 Roundabout 2024 PM WO Roundabout 3, Hualalai Rd (North) 1110912021 Irbirwdort IMerseclion Detay slveh 97.4 interseclian LOS 1" ApprO h EB NB BB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 M Approach Flaw, vebih 96 1191 1229 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 98 1237 1254 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh Q35 14 85 3lehic:le5 Exiling, vehih 107 1323 1159 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3,186 Pert Vol Crass -ng Leg, Alh 0 0 a Pett Cap Adi 1.000 1,0W 1.000 Apprc-ach Delay, s.lveh 17.4 79.4 121.1 AWoach LOS C F F Lane Lot koLett' De&r naiEd Moves LR LT TR ,Assumed Moves LR LT TR RT Chmnneli, ed Lane U01 1,000 1.040 1.000 Crlticel Hearvey, s 5.13 5.193 5.193 Entry Flay, vehlh 98 1237 1254 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 329 1119 1035 Entry HV Adj Faclor MIK) 0.963 0.980 Flow Entry,. vehlh 98 1191 1229 Cap Entry, veh;h 322 1077 1.014 VIC Ratio 9.298 1106 1.212 Control Delay, siveh 174 79,4 12f.1 LOS C F F 951h utile Que4e, veh 1 29 39 5:00 pm Basetine Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 2O10 Roundabout 2024 PM WO Roundabout 4; Hualalai Rd (South) 11109;2021 Irbirwdort Interseclion Detay, siveh 93.7 intersection LOS F ApprWh WB NB BB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 M Approach Flaw, vebih 87 1127 1298 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 89 1161 1328 Vehicles Cireulafing, vehlh 1157 68 15 3lehic;le5 Exiling, vehih 72 1276 1239 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3,186 Pert Vol Cross -.ng Leg, Alh 0 0 a Pett Cap Actj 1,000 1,6U0 1.000 Apprc-ach Delay, s.rveh 16.0 78.3 112.3 Approach LOS C F F Lane Lot. L�fl Left' De&i nalEd Moves LR TR LT ,Assumed Moves LR TR LT RT Chmnneli, ed Lane U01 1,000 1,000 1.000 Critical Headway, 5 5.193 5,193 5.193 Entry Flay, vehlh 89 1161 1328 Cap Entry Lane, vehih 355 1.056 1113 Entry HV Adj Factor 0A78 0.071 0.978 FIDw Entry,. vehfh 87 1127 1298 Cap Entry, veh;h 347 1025 1889 VEC Ratio 0.251 1,100 1,193 Control Delay, siveh 15.0 73.3 112,3 LOS C F F 951h utile Que4e, veh 1 28 39 5:00 pm Basetine Synchro 10 Report Page 2 HCM 2010 Rourdabout 2024 PM WO Roundabout 0: Kuakini Street 11109-2021 llnte tlort Interseclion Detay, siveh 153.6 Intersection LOS F Apormh EB NB BB Entry Lanes 1 1 11 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 M Approach Flaw, vebih 332 1304 1132 Derrand Flaw Rate, vehlh 339 1349 1155 Vehicles Cireulaling, vehlh 1155 4 354 3lehic;le5 Exiling, vehih 354 1494 986 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.1.86 3.186 3,186 Pert Vol Cross -.ng Leg, Alh a 0 a Ilett Cap Actj 1,000 1,660 1.000 Apprc-ach Delay, s.rveh 71.7 109.2 228.B Approach LOS F F F Uwe LOR Left' De&�natEd Moves LR LT TR ,Assumed Moves -R LT TR RT ChmnnOiaed Lane U01 1.601) 1,000 1.000 Critical headway, s 5.1$3 5.193 5.193 Entry Flay, vehlh 339 1340 1155 Cap Entry Lane, vehil7 356 1130 793 Entry HV Adj Faclor 0,979 0,973 0.980 Flown Entry,. vehfh 332 1304 1132 Cap Entry, veh;h 349 1100 773 VEC Ratio 4.952 1.186 1.466 Control Delay, siveh 71,7 109,2 228.8 LOS F F F 951h utile Que4e, veh 10 38 52 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Appendix E Analysis Reports — Future With Project Conditions (2024) Tinilr-gS 2024 AM 1: Falaili Rd & RULJ-,0 11 1 c 12 2021 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL W8T WBR NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M tt r tt r ' ++ r ' tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 71 51 G 218 1515 775 38 243 192. 118 22 321 177 Future Volume (vph; 71 516 218 165 775 38 243 192 118 22 321 177 Turn Type 'rot NA Perm Rot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 5 Qetectc,r Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 O Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# 1:s) 9.5 38.5 38,5 95 38,5 38.5 9,5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (5) 11.0 39.0 39,G 1&0 44.0 44,0 20.0 54.8 54,8 10.2 45.0 45.0 Total SPI it(%) 9.2% 32.5% 32.5% 13.3% 36.7% 367% 16.7% 45.7% 45.7% $.5ia 37.5% 37.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max NcmL, max Max None Ncne None None Name None Act Effct Green (s) 6.4 36.2 36.2' 9,7 41.8 41.8 11.9 30.1 30. i 5.8 17.3 17.3 Actuated grO Ratio 0.07 0.39 D.39 0.10 0.45 0.45 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.19 6.19 vie Ratio 0.33 0.41 0.32 0,48 0;52 0.05 0.58 4.17 0.20 0.20 9.50 0.41 Control Delay 49.9 24.5 5.2 46.6 23.0 0.1 45.8 23.4 4.0 51.5 36,3 7.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.9 24.5 5.2 45.6 23.0 4.1 45.8 23.4 4,0 61.5 36,3 7,6 LOS D C A D C A 0 C A D D A Appicauh Letay 2.1.5 26.11 29,1 27.1 Approeah LOS C 0 C C Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 124 Actuated Cycle Length: 93.3 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe, Semi A-A-Llncoord Maximum u c Ratio: 0.58 Intersection Signal Dalae: 25.6 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersection Capacity Lt6lization 63.3% ILLI Level of 5eNce B Analysis Period [min) 15 1; Palani Rd & Raute 11 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Ir,ttorsection Sun-tma{y 2024 AM W 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 arrrent EBL EBT EBR 'WBL dlBT VVBR NEL Na MR SEL f SIS Lane Configurations �1 tt r tt r ++ r Traffic Volume (veWh) 71 515 218 165 775 38 243 192 118 22 321 177 Future Volume ;vehlh) 71 516 218 165 77'5 38 243 192 118 22 321 177 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1737 1767 1737 1$41 1811 1841 1811 1870 1856 1870 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 72 527 D 168 791 0 248 198 0 22 328 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0,98 0.98 198 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,98 0,98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cep. vehlh 159 1553 251 1676 344 772 43 498 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.46 0.00 0.07 0,49 •0.00 0.10 0.22 D.00 0.02 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1560 3401 3554 1-572 1781 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 72 527 C, 168 791 0 246 i 10 C'+ 22 :328 0 Grp Sat Flovv(s),veh!hiln 1605 1678 1172 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1585 0 Serves -s), s f.8 8.1 0.0 3.9 12.4 0.0 5_7 3.7 0.0 1.0 7.1 0,0 Cycle 01 dear(g_c), 5 1,8 &1 0.0 3.9 12,4 0.0 5.7 3.7 0,0 1.0 7.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.b0 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehtlh 159 1553 261 1676 344 772 43 498 VJC Ratio(X) 0,45 0.34 0.67 047 0.72 0.25 0.5t 0-R Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 257 1553 482 1676 660 2205 125 1775 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.170 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.04 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 373 13.9 0_0 36.6 13.8 0.0 35.3 263 0'C 30.1 310 0,0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 2.0 0.6 0.0 3.1 1.0 0.0 2.8 0.2 0,0 9,1 1.5 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 0.7 2.9 0.0 1.7 4.6 0.0 2.5 1.5 4.0 0.5 3.1 0:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 39,5 14.5 0.0 39.5 14.8 0,0 3'8.2 26.5 0.0 48.2 34.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Appfcauh Vol, veli h 699 A 959 A 444 A 350 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 17.5 19.2 33.0 35.4 Approach LOS B B C D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.5 22.1 10.5 42.0 12.7 15.9 8.5 44.01 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.7 50.3 11.E 34.5 15.5 40.5 E.5 39.5 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 3.0 5.7 5.9 17.1 7.7 9.1 J.8 14.4 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.4 0.2 3.6 0.5 2.9 0.0 5.8 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 218 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2024 AM W 2: Henry St & Routo 11 1V12.202'I --v t- `" t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SH' Lane Configurations M tt r M +� 0 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 10T 423 124 59 710 52° 146 337 47 408 339 Future Volume (vph) 107 4123 124 59 71.0 529 146 337 47 408 339 Turn Type Prot NA Perm. Prot NA Porro Split NA Psrm Split NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitlad Phases 4 8 2 Qetectof Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 2 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s} 9.5 30.5 30,5 9,5 30.3 30.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.3 35,5 Total Split (s) 12.0 36.8 367 9 10.1 35.0 35.0 07.4 37.0 37,0 36.0 30.0 Total SPI rt(%) 10.0% 30.8% 30,8% 8.4% 29.2% 29.29 30.8% 30.8°. 30.8% 30,0%, 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 TOW Lost Tim s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None None Norge Act Eflut Green (s) 7.4 35.1 35.1 5.7 31.0 31.x7 18.2 18.2 18.2 25.5 25.5 Actuated grO Ratio 0.07 0.35 0.35 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.25 0.25 vie Raba 0.48 0.38 0.21 0.33 0.70 0.64 0.48 0.60 0.14 0.74 0,73 Control Delay 55.6 29.0 6.5 54.8 36.9 6.8 43.2 42.1 1.1 47.1 38.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 D.0 0.0 0,0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.5 28.0 6.5 54,8 36.8 6.5 43.2 42.1 1.1 47.1 36.8 LOS E C A C D A 0 D A D D App, cauh Delay 29.1 25.5 38,8 41.6 Approe5h LOS C 0 I} I) Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 124 Actuated Cycle Length; 100.3 Natural Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Ra#o: 0.74 Inteiseclian Signal Delay: 32.5 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersection CaPaci#y U61izaatiort 69.7°k ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 S lb and Phases: 2: HenrySt & RaIUW 1,/ 1 JO 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HI; M Signalized lntesection Capacity Analysts 2024 AM VV 2. Henry St & Route 11 1V12.202'I "arneiit EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR fNBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBFT Lane Configurations M ++ r M + r 1 4+ 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 107 413 124 59 M 529 146 337 47 408 339 124 Future Volume (vph) 107 423 124 59 710 529 146 337 47 408 339 124 !deal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 190Ci 1900 1900 19M 3900 19N 1960 190€7 19M 1900 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane 4ttil. Factcr 0.97 0.95 1.a0 0.97 0.95 1.00 Q.91 9.81 1.00 0.91 0,91 Frpb, ped; bikes 1.00 1.00 Q.99 1,00 1,00 0.99 1.44 1.Oti 0,99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, pe ikes 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 i,00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Flt Proteded 0,95 1,00 1. DO 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,0t} tM, 0.95 0,99 Said, Flaw (p;otf 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1467 1595 3175 FR Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow ' errr' 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1554 3348 1487 1595 3175 Peat[ -hour factor, Pict= 0.97 0.97 17.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 110 436 128 61 732 545 151 347 48 421 349 128 RTOR Reductkxr (vph) O 0 84 0 0 372 0 O 39 0 19 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 110 436 44 61 732 173 136 352 9 299 580 0 Confl, Peds. (Nhr} 2 2 4 3 3 4 Confl. Bikes (R?hr) 1 Heavy Vehides.�4'gj• 13% 10°'S 5% 6% 6% 3% 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 51!0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Pe -m Split NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.3 35.1 35.1 4.3 32.1 32.1 1 B.2 18.2 18.2 75.5 25.5 Effective Green, g (s) 7.3 35.1 35.1 4,3 32.1 32.1 18.2 18.2 18.7 25.5 25,5 Actuated g)C natio 0.47 0.85 0.35 0,04 0,32 0.32 0.38 0.18 0,18 0,25 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 41.5 V'ehde Extension s}- 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3.0 3.8 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 223 1139 526 140 1081 491 281 63 12 267 402 800 v+s Ballo Prot ctl.O4 00.13 0.02 cO.21 0.09 GO. 11 c9.19 0.18 Vs Ratio Perm OM 0.11 0.01 Oc: Ratio 0.49 0-38 ME 0,44 OM 0.35 0.48 0.60 3.03 6.74 0.72 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 45.1 24,8 22.2 47.2 30,0 26,5 37.2 38.1 34.2 34.8 34.6 Progression Factor 1.110 1.00 1.30 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.GO 1.00 3.M Inc'emental Delay, d2 1.7 1.0 0.3 2.2 3.4 2,17 1.3 1.7 0.0 7.3 3.3 Delay (s) 46;8 25,8 215 49.4 33,4 28.5 38.5 39.8 34.2 42.1 37.9 Le'v'el of Service 1) C C D C C D D C D D Appfua; th Delay Isi 28.6 32.1 39,0 89.3 Approach LA'S C C L' D tntatsection Summa HDA 2000 Control delay 34.4 HCM M Levet of Service C HC 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated C be Length (s-) 101,1 Sum of EQst erne ;s) 18,0 intemecflon Capacity Oliaation 69.7% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period (min) 15 c CrOical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 61:h TWSC 2024 AM W I ROUtO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2721 Inteesedion Int Delay. siveh movement 20,2 ML EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Gontigurations - - - - - r ' t + r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 44 55 184 1183 914 30 Future Vol, vehih 44 55 164 1163 914 30 ConllicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - YAd Storage Length 140 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Starager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor g3 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 MAvint Flow 47 59 176 127 963 32 Majorl'rrior M1111 MOM Maio, Conlaic6ng Flaw AJI 2608 - 964 0 0 Stage 1 W - - - - - Stage 2 1624 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42. 4.12 - - Critical Crit cal t4dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5,42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51$ - 2.218 - - - Pol Cap -1 Maneuver -27 0 702 Stage 1 362 0 - - 5lage 2 177 0 - Platoon blocied, % - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver -20 - 761 - - - tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar - 20 - Stage 1 271 Stage 2 177 . . Approach M N8 SB HGM Control Delay, $1027,1 1.4 0 HCM LOS F Mhor Uriie major MMlvmt NIBL NBT EBLn1 EBW SBT SBR Capacity (vehh) 701 - 20 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,252 - 2.366 - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 11.9 $1027.1 0 HCtwf Lane LDS B - F A - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 1 - 6.3 Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacky S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Ara] major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseaine Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PINI 1N 4: Route 11 & Hualalai Rd (South) 1111212021 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h 1. movemeni Y4'BL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT LdnC- Gonligurations p 13.1 - r T4 it $ - }j f Traffic Vol, v&Vh 9 140 1206 15 73 891 Future Vol, vehlh 9 140 1206 15 73 891 ConiticOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Yield - None Storage Langlh 0 0 Veh in Median Starager ] 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 Peaak Hour Faclor g3 93 83 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 a 5 MAvinl Flow 10 151 1297 16 78 958 majormhof M r "i MOM MajoI ConllicUng Flow' All 2419 0 0 1297 0 Stage 1 1305 - - - - - Stage 2 1114 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42 - - 4.16 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ _ _ 2.254 Poo Cap -1 Ma aver 36 0 - - 521 - Stage 1 254 0 Slage 2 314 0 - - - - Platoon bluGied,'k - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 31 - - - 521 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuvar 31 - - - - - Stage 1 254 Stage 2 267 Approach we No 813 HCM Control Delay, s 167 0 1 HCM LOS F mhor LarWi41aior MMlvmt Nf NBRWBLr111BLA2 S81. SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 31 - 521 - HGM Lane V.'C Ralb - 0.312 - 0.151 - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 167 p 13.1 - HGNI Lane LDS - F it $ - HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1 - 15 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Tinlir(l,b 2024 AM W 37: RUUtCl 1' & P1,laPL1aallUl St 11,12.2021 t -01 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WEL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL #T SBR Lane CDnfiguratians t r I t f + r Traffic Volume (vph) 193 9 75 111 59 140 104 901 26 43 792 68 Future Volume (vph) 193 9 75 111 59 140 104 901 26 43 792 fib Turn Type Perm NA Perris Perm NA Perris pm+p# NA Perm pm+pt NA Perris Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 8 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 8,6 58.0 58,C 9.5 57.9 57,9 Total SPI rt(%) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0° 25.0% 10.7% 54.4°/o 64,4°ie 10.6% C4.3°f: 154.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead,tag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Nene None Ncrii3 Nc.ne None None Nare Max Max None Max Max ActEffctGreen (s) 16.4 16.4 16.4 1$,4 16.4 1&4 56.7 55.T 55.7 57.7 53.8 53,8 Actuated grC Ratio 0.19 0.19 0,19 _x,19 0.19 0.19 0.65 0.64 0.64 0.67 0.62 0.62 vie Ratio 0.83 0.03 0.22 0.45 0.1$ 0.35 4.36 4.81 0.43 0.18 075 0.07 Control Delay 62.3 29.3 9.1 37.6 31.5 8.2 7.6 20.5 0.0 6.0 18.4 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0. 0.0 0 0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.3 29.3 9.1 37.13 31.5 8,2 7.6 20.5 0,0 C.0 16.4 2,2 LOS E C A D C A A C A A 5 A App, cauh Letay 46.$ 23.1 18.7 16,15 Approach LOS 1) 0 B B Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 86.7 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum, We Rato: 0.83 Inteisecllan Signal Delay: 21.6 Intersectlan LOIS: C Interseatlan Capacity Utilization 80, ?A ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Sun-tmi+ary 2024 AM VV 5; Route 11 & Puapuaanui St 11!12.202'I NbVement EBI_ EBT EBR WBL VVFBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t r I t + �' '� + r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 193 9 75 111 59 140 104 9D1 26 43 792 68 Future Volume ,wehih) 193 9 75 111 59 140 1'04 99f 26 43 792 68 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.CD 1,00 1,00 1_LI0 1,00 1.fl0 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.570 1.00 1.Du 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 1$70 1870 1870 1850 1670 1870 1826 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 310 10 0 118 64 0 113 959 0 46 843 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0-D2 0.94 0,92 0,94 0.92 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,94 D.32 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 5 1 Cep, vehlh 311 376 357 376 337 1133 262 1088 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 Cala 0.110 0.05 0.51 O.00 0.04 0.60 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1338 1870 1585 1405 1870 1585 1759 1856 1585 1781 1826 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 210 10 G 118 64 D 113 9u;' 0 46 843 0 Grp Sat Fiow(s),veh!hiln 1338 1870 1585 1405 1870 1585 1751 1856 1585 1781 1826 1855 0 Serve{s_s), s 13.8 0.4 O.G 6.6 2.5 0.0 2.1 37.3 U-0 0.9 31,x7 0,51 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 16.3 0.4 0.0 7.0 2,5 0.0 2.1 37.3 OX 0.9 31.0 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.DG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veNb 311 376 3,57 376 337 1133 262 1086 VJC Ratio(X) 0.67 0.03 0.33 0.17 0.34 0.85 0.18 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 311 376 357 376 345 1133 293 1086 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,x 1,00 1.90 1.170 1.f?0 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.04 0.00 1.00 1.04 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 36.4 28.8 0.0 31.6 29.6 0.0 12.4 14.1 0,0 14.0 13.6 0,0 her Delay (d2). slveh 5.7 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.6 7.9 0,0 0.3 5.4 0.0 In!r at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.9 0,2 0.0 21 1.1 0.4 0.8 16,0 0.4 0.4 12.8 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 42,0 28.8 0.0 32,1 29.8 0.0 13.0 2LO 0.0 14.3 19.0 10 LnGrp L05 D C C C B C B B Apprcach'Jo1, veli?h 220 A 182 A 107', A 889 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 41.1 31.3 18.7 Approach LOS D C C B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 59.1 22.5 9.2 57.9 22.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.0 53.5 18,0 5.1 53.4 1$.D Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.9 39.3 18.3 4.1 310 9.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 6.5 U 0.0 6,5 0.4 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 22,E HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2024 AM W 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakim Stroot 1 c12.2021 Intersection ht ill Y s.veh 11.1 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions H M 95th %file 0(veh) r t f r Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 159 602 914 932 2 Future Vol, vehlh 0 159 6502 914 932 2 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 4 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - None - YWd Storage Length 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager 9 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 4 2 5 5 7 MAvint Flow 0 171 647 983 1072 2 MajorUra Mincf2 Majorl K0jqr2 Conflicting Flovu AJI 3279 1002 0 - 0 Stage 1 1 - - - - - Stage 2 2277 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42 4.12 - - Critical Crit cal t4dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51$ - 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Mar rover 10 b 691 - - - Stage 1 35a 0 - - Slage 2 83 0 Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1 - 691 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar t - Stage 1 23 Stage 2 83 Approach N8 S HGM Control Delay, s 0 17.9 0 HCM LOS A mhor UrWmajor MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBW 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 691 • - _ - - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0.937 - - - - MGM Control Delay (s) 45 - 0 0 HGNI Lane LDS € - A A - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) 113.1 - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tinilr-gs 2024 AM W (; Rt Ute 1 -�IkO Strtle:t lL kc� S€r t 1 12.2021 --p- ' *.-- ! Large Group EBL EBT W8L 'WBT NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians I 1� li T4 + r t ' Traffic Volume (vph) 281 48 59 36 33 927 55 164 787 146 Future Volume ,vphj 281 48 fig 36 33 927 55 164 787 146 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 4 B 8 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Sp1i# ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (8) 29.0 29.0 24.4 24.4 9.5 51.4 81.4 15.2 87,1 67.1 Total SPI it(%) 19.3% 19.3° 16.3% 16.3% 6.3% 54.3% 54.3% 10.1°l* 58.1% 58,1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to IX I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead,tag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Oplirnize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse Nene None Nome Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 24.5 24.5 19.9 19.9 81.9 76.9 76.9 92.1 B4.5 84.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.1 B 0.13 0.55 0.51 0.51 0.61 0.56 0,56 vie Ratio 1.03 0.40 0.31 1.06 0.18 1.03 0.07 1A3 0.81 0.17 Contras Delay 121.8 41.4 63.1 102,0 14.0 73.7 0.2 115.4 34.4 5.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 121,8 41,4 63.1 102,0 14.0 73.7 0.2 115.4 31,4 5.8 LOS F to E F B E A F C A App, cauh Leiay 98.2 05.4 67.7 42.7 Approach LOS 1= F E* 11 Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuale�! Cyde Length. 160 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.06 Inteisectlan Signal Delay. 66.3 Intersectlon LOS E intention Capacity U61izalion 108.E ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7, Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street {gipa 01 t01 4 �u F3 7 CESS 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Pagh 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-ima{y 2024 AM W T Route 11 & Lako Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11;12.2021 I'4layament EBL EBT M WBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 T4 E" Traffic Volume (vehfh) 281 48 59 59 36 294 33 927 55 164 787 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 281 48 E9 69 36 299 33 827 55 164 787 146 initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.04 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1874 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1449 1811 165G 1870 Adj Flour Rake,. vehlh 299 51 0 73 38 0 35 BE 0 174 837 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 4.94 0.94 8,94 0.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Cap, vehlh 319 335 102 108 284 1077 205 1122 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.15 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.55 U OC 0.06 0.69 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 3870 0 1781 1870 15610 1725 1850 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 299 51 G 73 38 0 35 9813 0 174 837 0 Grp Sat F1cvv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 22.6 3.1 D.a 5.5 2.7 0.0 1.1 64.7 U-0 5.5 44.4 0,4 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, 5 22.6 3.1 0.4 5.5 2,7 0.0 1.1 64.7 0,0 6,5 44,1 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 O.DD 1.04 0.00 1.00 1,04 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 319 835 142 108 284 1077 205 112.2 VJC Ratio(X) 0.94 0,15 0,72 0.35 0.12 0.92 0.85 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 319 M 257 272 301 1077 244 1122 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), cMb 55.3 47.3 CIO 63.3 61.9 0.0 17.3 26.4 U 30.9 19,5 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 34.1 0.2 4,0 S.0 2.0 0.0 D.2 13.4 0.0 20.5 4.5 D.13 In!r at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 13.2 i's 0.0 2.8 1.3 U DA 31.6 0.0 4.6 19.9 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 89.4 47.5 0.9 7;2.3 63.9 H 17.5 39.5 0.0 51.4 24.0 10 LnGrp LOS F D E E B D D C Appfoauh Vol, veb!h 354 A 111 A 1421 A 1011 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 83.3 69.4 38.7 28.7 Approach LOS F E D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.1 83.2 20.0 8.2 87.1 12.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 10.7 711.9 24.5 5.0 82.6 19.9 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.5 66.7 24,6 11 466 7.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 5.4 010 0.0 7,7 02 tnte-fsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 42.3 HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Timings 2024 AM 8, Kamehameha III Road & Route 11 11112!2021 Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 8. Kameharneha III .Road Rote 11 I at I6 03 T 04 o7 t08 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 16 -1111. t Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NBT 8BL SIFT '? Lane CDnfiguratians 4 r 4:4 T +T4 Traffic Volume (vph) 5 26 12 76 568 16 501 Future Volume (vph) 5 26 12 Ifs 568 16 501 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot HA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permitlad Phases 2 Qetectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 95 23.5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.5 30.5 30.0 11.0 35.0 8.5 315 Total SPI rt(%) 29.0°la 29.E 28.6% 10.5% 33.3% 9.0% 31.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{3 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Nore Ncne None Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 13.8 13.0 7.0 61 39.4 5.1 29.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.09 0.56 0.07 0.42 vie Ratio 0.60 0.08 a27 0,53 H3 0.13 0.63 Contra! Delay 34.T 0.4 27.3 49.3 19,7 38.5 17.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 6.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.7 1]_4 27.3 49,3 19,7 38,5 17.8 LOS C A C D t3 ID B App, cauh Delay 30.5 27.3 23.11 18.2 Appronh LOS C C C 8 Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglth:105 Actuated Cycle Length; 70,7 Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum u c RaW-. 0.63 Inteisectlan Signal Delay; 21.7 Intersectlan LOS- C Interaon Capacity Utilization 63.21, ILLI Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 8. Kameharneha III .Road Rote 11 I at I6 03 T 04 o7 t08 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 16 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Sun-1mary 2024 AM W 8; Kame•harneha III React & ROL& 11 11;12.2021 110. 4 -01 I'4layament EBI EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r V I. I +T Traffic Volume (vehfh) 181 5 26 16 12 17 76 558 15 16 501 326 Future Volume ;vehih) 181 5 25 16 12 17 76 568 15 16 501 328 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 D 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.04 0.9ta 1_CI4 0.88 1.00 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.40 1.010 1.a0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1811 1870 1722 1874 1781 1796 1752 1811 1870 1870 1811 1811 Adj Row Rate,. vehlh 195 5 D 17 13 1a 82 611 1G 17 539 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.83 0X 0.93 0,93 0,93 0.93 0.93 0,93 0.93 0,83 D.93 Percent Heavy Veh, °!c 6 2 12 i a 7 10 6 2 2 6 6 Gap, vehlh 264 7 26 20 27 102 1576 23 36 1575 Arrive On Gruen 0.15 0.15 0.00 0.05 0.05 17.05 0,06 0.54 150 0.02 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1739 45 1459 570 436 604 1668 17,% 46 1781 3532 0 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 260 0 D 48 0 D 82 0 627 17 539 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1783 0 1459 1611 0 04 1668 0 1802 1781 1721 0 0 Servefs_s), s t3.8 0.0 0.0 1,9 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 16.5 D_6 5.4 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_c), 5 6.8 0.0 0.0 1.9 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 16.9 0.6 6,4 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.00 0.35 0.37 1.00 0,43 1.00 0 -CIO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, ve" 270 0 73 0 0 102 0 895 36 1575 VJC Ratio(X) 0.74 0,1)0 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0,70 007 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 732 0 648 0 0 171 D 899 141 1575. HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,D0 1,00 1.00 1.(10 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1100 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 25.7 0.0 CIO 29.8 0.0 10.0 29.3 4.0 12.2 30.7 11.0 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 4.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 4.5 9.1 0.6 0.0 In!t al Q Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 u.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfOftD(54°l9),vehfln 3,0 D.0 0.0 0A 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 6.2 0.3 2.0 D:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 29.6 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 16,7 39.7 11.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Appfcauh Vol, veil h 200 A 48 709 556 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 29.5 39.6 19.7 12.5 Approach LOS C rD B B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 7 l3 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 14.1 8.4 13.5 7.4 5.8 36.1 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 6.5 29,0 25.5 5.0 30.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 8.8 5.1 8.4 3.9 2.6 18.9 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 1.0 0.0 3,2 0.2 0.0 3.0 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay �9.G HChA 6th LOS 0 N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 K -.,M 6, 11 T' VSC. 202,1 AM VV 9: Rout€ 1' & Rayed Vistab 1` 122 -ill Intersection Int DelFy. siveh 2.3 Movement W13L 'SBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonligurations HGM Control Delay (s) r t r }j f Traffic Vol, v&Vh 29 61 914 14 13 903 Future Vol, vehlh 20 61 914 t4 13 903 ConnicOng Peds. Or i7 0 a 0 0 0 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channelized . YJeJd - y'lefd - Wane Storage Length fl 0 - 500 5A0 - Veh in Median Starager # 0 - 0 - - to Grade. % fl - a - - 0 Paak Hour Faclar 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MAvint Flow 32 66 993 15 14 982 Major"Oa mirlpr1 M,ajorl MajW Conflicting Flovu AJI 2003 993 0 0 993 0 Stage 1 9'93 - - - - - Slage 2 1010 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 J.22 - - 4.12 - Crit cal t4dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.31$ - - 2.218 - Pol CW1 Marmver M 298 - - 696 - Stage 1 359 Slage 2 352 . _ _ _ _ Platoon blocied, % - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver 65 298 - 696 - tJlav Cup -2 Maneuvar 65 Slage 1 359 Stage 2 345 Approach WR N6 SB HCM Control Delay, s 47.5 9 0.1 HCM LOS E mhor LarWmaior MMlvmt Nf NBRWBLRIWBLnZ Slat. SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 65 299 696 - HGM Lane V.'C Rat#o - 0.485 0.222 0.02 - HGM Control Delay (s) - - 104.2 20,5 10.3 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F C S FILM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1.9 0.8 0.1 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 19 Tin7ir(lS 2024 PM 1: Falaili Rd & RULI`r; 11 1 c12.2321 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians �1 tt r tt e 1� ++ +t r Traffic Volume (vph) X0 997 503 227 695 61 227 283 268 55 313 107 Future Volume (vph; 2160 997 503 227 695 61 227 253 268 55 313 197 Turn Type ;'Tct NA Perm Peat NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 4 8 2 5 Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9,5 38.5 38,5 9,5 35,5 38.5 9.5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 19.9 45.0 45,0 16,0 411 41,1 15.0 45.2 45,2 131.8 410 43.0 Total SPI it(%) 16.6% 37.5% 37.5% 13.3% 34.3% 34.3% 13.3% 37.7°7n 37.7% 11.547 35.8% 35.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 760 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 41,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Nene Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None Norio None None ActEffctGreen (s) 12.4 41.0 41.0 10,8 39.4 39.4 10.8 22.5 22.5 7.9 17.3 17,3 Actuated grC Ratio 0.13 0.42 0.42 0.11 0.40 0.40 0.11 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.18 D.18 vie Ralio 0.62 0.69 0.59 0.62 0.51 0.09 0.62 0.36 0,48 U9 0.51 0.30 Control Delay 48.6 28.4 10.2 51.1 25.9 2.4 51.3 33.5 6.7 54.3 35,8 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 G,0 0.0 6.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 L,0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 4B,U 28.4 14.2 51.1 25.9 2.4 51,3 33,5 6.7 54.3 38.8 8.3 LOS ED C E D C A D C A D D A App, cath Delay 26.2 303 29,5 33.7 Approeah LOS C 0 C C Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 124 Actuated Cycle Length: 98.1 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0.69 Inteisectlan Signal Delay; 28.7 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization ss e% ICU Level of 5eNce C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1: Palani Rd & Route 11 NO a1 102 03 -004 05 06 07 08 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Intersection S0tn-trna{y 2024 PM W 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11:12.2021 ' 1` I'4layarnerrt EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT VJBR NBL NET NBR SBL 'SBT SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt r M tt " ft r tt r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 2Gil 997 503 227 695 61 227 283 258 55 313 107 Future Volume ;wehih) 2K 997 �G3 227 695 61 227 283 268 55 313 107 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 tr 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0c 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,60 1.90 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,D0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No Add Sat Row, veh1hin 1855 1856 1670 1870 1841 1870 1855 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 265 1017 0 232 709 0 232 283 0 56 319 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 US 4.98 0,98 0,98 198 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,38 0.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 P 2 f 2 Cap, vehlh 356 1651 315 1594 315 673 76 499 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.47 CAD 0,09 0,46 9.00 U9 0.19 UQ 0.04 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3428 3526 1585 3456 3497 1585 3428 3854 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 265 1017 G 232 709 0 232 289 0 56 319 0 Grp Bat Flovv(s),veh!hiln 1714 1763 1535 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 17'77 1555 0 Serves -s), s 616 18.5 0.G 5.7 12.0 0.0 5_7 6.2 0.0 2.7 7.3 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 6.5 15.6 0,0 5.7 12,0 0.0 5.7 6.2. 4.0 2.7 7.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.OG 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.D0 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 356 1651 315 1594 315 673 76 4 VJC Ratio(X) 0.74 0.62 174 0.44 0.74 0.43 0.74 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 611 1651 460 1594 456 1672 192 1582 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,x 1,00 1.00 1.110 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 37,6 17.2 0-0 33.3 16.1 4.0 38.3 30.9 0,0 40.9 35.1 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 3.1 1.7 0.0 3.4 0.9 0.0 3.6 0.4 0,0 12.8 1.4 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 4,0 0.1) .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 2.8 7.3 0,0 2.5 4_6 0.4 2.5 2.6 4.0 1.4 3,2 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),slveh 40.7 18.9 0,0 41,1 17.0 0.0 41.8 31.4 0.0 53.7 36.5 17.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D D Apprcauh Vol, veb!h 1282 A 941 A 521 A 375 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 23.1 23.1 36.{1 39.0 Approach LCIS C C D D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 20.9 12.4 45.0 12.4 16.6 13.5 43.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 9.3 40.7 11.E 40.5 11.5 38.5 15A 36.6 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 4,7 8.2 7.7 20,6 7.7 9.3 a,5 14.0 Green Ext Tome (p), s 0.0 2.0 0.3 7.1 0.3 2.2 0.5 4.9 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 27.4 HChA 6th LOS C; N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bras.,;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2024 PM W 2: Henry St & Routo 11 1V12.202'I -',, --* t Large Group EBL EBT EBR VVBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL SBF Lane Configuratians i1 tt Or )I tt r 1 0 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 190 798 231 82 655 360 126 318 39 401 342 Future Volume (vph) 190 798 291 82 655 360 126 318 39 401 342 Turn Type Prat NA Perm Prot NA Perm Skil NA Perm SO A NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitlad Phases 4 8 2. Di3tectad Phase 7 4 4 3 6 a 2 2 2 6 n Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9.5 30.5 30.5. 9,5 30,5 30.5 85.5 35.5 35,5 35,5 35,5 Total Split (s) 14,0 37.0 37,G 9 5 32,5 3f,5 37.5 37,5 37,5 36.0 36-,0 Total SPI it(%) 11.711/0 30.8% 30.8°et 7.9% 27.1% 27,1% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 30.0%, 30.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tirne (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{t to 1.0 11,0 1.0 1.G 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 LeadLag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None Nano Nano Act Effct Green (s) 9.3 34.9 34.9 6.1 28.4 28.4 17,3 17.3 17.3 26.2 26.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.09 0.35 D.35 0.05 029 0,29 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.26 0.26 vie Ratio 0.62 0.66 a40 0.48 0,67 0.52 0.42 0.57 0.12 0.75 0.72 Control Delay 55.4 33.3 5.4 53,3 37.6 6,8 41.8 41.8 0.7 46.9 36,3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.4 33.3 5.4 59,3 37.6 6.5 41,8 41,$ 0,7 46.8 36.3 LOS E C A E D A 0 D A D D App, cauh Delay 30.3 29A 38.5 39,9 Approach LOS C C 1) 13 Intersection Summa Cycle Lei glih: 124 Actuated Cycle Length: 99.5 Natural Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum vlc Rato: 0.75 Inteiseclion Signal Delay: 33.3 Intersectlan LOS: C Intersection Capaci#y Utilization 116% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: Henry St & RaIUW 11 04 iY! 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lntesection Capacity Analysis 2024 PM W 2. Henry St & Route 11 11112.2021 '# - t I'41oamerrt EEL EBT EBR 'W6L WBT WBR NBL NBT IBR SB'G W SBR Dane Configurations i1 tt r )I tt r 1 0 We 116 337 4t 319 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 798 291 a2 655 360 126 318 39 401 342 190 Future Volume (vph) 198 798 291 82 655 360 126 318 39 401 342 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 1904 1900 19104 1900 1900 1900 19DO 1900 1800 1900 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lana Ubl. Fater 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.OU, Q.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 4.91 3.0 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1,49 1.00 1,00 0.99 1.44 1.90 0,98 1.00 -199 276 Flpb, pedfbikes 1M 1.00 1,04 1100 1100 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1,00 1.0 cO.10 Frt I M 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 0.00 Flt Protected 4.9.5 1,00 1. DO 4.95 1.04 1,00 0.95 1,00 1.G0 0.95 0,99 0.76 Said, Flaw (p;otf 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1510 3195 33.7 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Inc'ernental Delay, d2 Satd, Flow (Gerrl1f 3335 3539 15$3 3433 3471 1561 1.595 3382 1537 1917 3195 47.9 Peal[ -hour IaCtor, U'H'F 0.98 0_98 D.98 9.98 0.98 0M 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 17.98 Adj. Flow(vph) 1R4 814 297 84 808 367 129 324 40 409 349 144 RTOR Reductkmi (Vph) 0 0 194 0 0 259 0 0 33 0 38 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 194 814 103 84 f68 We 116 337 7 319 595 0 Confl, Peds. (Nhr} 1 8 1 4 7 7 4 Confl. Bikes (A'hr) 9.3 34.9 34.9 1 29.5 1 17.4 1 Heavy Vehicles ti' NO 5% 21% 2% 2% 4% 2% 311,3 2% 311,10 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prat NA Perry Prct NA Perri spilt NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 9.3 34.9 34.9 3.9 29.5 29.5 17.4 17.4 17.4 26.2 26.2' Effective Green, g (s) 9.3 34.9 34.9 3.9 29.5 29.5 17.4 17.4 17.4 26-2 26,2 Actuated g)C natio 0,49 0.35 0.35 0.04 0,29 0.29 0-17 0.17 0,17 0,26 002b Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Verde Extension () 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.9 M 3.0 3.9 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 308 1230 550 133 1019 458 276 586 266 420 833 v+s Ratio Prot 47.06 c4.23 0,02 OA9 0.07 cO.10 c020 0.19 Vs Ratio Perm 0.07 0.07 0.00 v.'c Ratio 0.63 13_06 0.19 4.63 0.66 0,24 0.42 0.58 0,03 0.76 0.71 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 43.9 27.7 220 47.5 31.0 26,9 37.0 381 34,5 34.2 33.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.x}0 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.04 UfO 1.00 1.179 Inc'ernental Delay, d2 4,0 2.8 0.8 9.4 3.3 1.2 1,0 1A 0.0 7.7 2.9 Delay (s) 47.9 30.6 216 50,9 34,3 28.1 38.0 39.5 34.5 41.9 36,0 Le'v'el of Service D C C E C C D D C D D Appfuauh Delay (.sl 31.6 34.0 38.7 36.4 Approach LA'S C C D D tntatsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 34.9 HCM M Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 4.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s-) 100.4 Sum of Bost erne tsj 13.0 Intemecflon Capacity Utiliaatim 73.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysts Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2024 PM I RaUtO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2721 Intersection ht Fly)' s•veh 1.4 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions - 239.9 0 r B t t r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 14 85 86 1105 1215 17 Future Vol, vehlh U 85 86 1105 121: 17 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 4 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - None - YWd Storage Length 144 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 MAvint Flow 10 88 89 1139 1253 18 Majorf#JEira Mir ort Major1 majo Conflicting Flovu AJI 2,974 1253 0 0 Stage 1 1253 - - - - - Stage 2 1317 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 662 4.12 - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Maneuver 29 0 555 Stage 1 269 0 - - 5lage 2 254 0 - Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 24 - 555 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 24 - Stage 1 7A Stage 2 2H Approach m NO HGM Control Delay, s 239.9 0.9 U HCM LOS F Minor Uriie major MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 566 - 24 HGM Lane V.'C Rada 0.16 - 0.43 - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 12.7 - 239.9 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F it - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) DA - 1.3 - - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2024 PM 1N 4: Route 11 & Hualalai Rd (South) 1111212021 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h movemem l.� Y4'BL WBI, NBT NBR SBL SBT LdnC- Gonfigurations - - - - - r 1 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy f Traffic Vol, v&Vh 14 71 1126 4 61 1241 Future Vol, vehlh 14 71 1126 4 61 1241 ConiticOng Peds, Or 0 a 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Step Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Yl dd - None Storage Langlh fl 0- 269.4 a 0.6 HCM LOS F Veh in Median Starager # 0 - a - - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 PIC Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 PAvinl Flow 14 73 1191 4 63 1279 Mejor"Oa Minorl Majw 010JOT2 Conflicting Flovu AJI 2568 - 0 0 1161 0 Stage 1 1113. - - - - - Stage 2 1405 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.47 - - 4.16 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.47 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.47 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3,568 _ _ _ 2.272 _ Poo Cap -1 Ma aver 28 0 - - 581 - Stage 1 291 0 - - Slage 2 221 a _ - - _ Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 25 - - - 581 - ttrlav Cop -2 Maneuvar 25 - - Stage 1 201 Slage 2 197 Approach m NO HGM Control Delay, s 269.4 a 0.6 HCM LOS F MhorLariwNaiartfvmt NBT NBRWBLAIWBLfk2 SBL SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 25 - 581 - HGM Lane V.'C Rol#o - - 11.577 - 0.108 - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 263.4 0 11.9 - HCtwf Lane LDS - IF A B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - 1.8 0.4 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Tin7ir(1,b 2024 PM W :n: Rc Lite} I' & Puapuaarlui St 1 12;2021 ---W 1 *--- t -01 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL #T SBR Lane CDnfiguratians + r t r V + + r Traffic Volume (vph) 199 23 115 51 23 104 105 810 60 142 10161 100 Future Volume (vph) 199 23 116 51 23 104 145 810 60 142 1016 100 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 a 8 2 2 6 6 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 b $ 8 5 2 2 1 n 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimus Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 22,5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 57.9 57,9 9.6 58,0 58,0 Total SPI it(%) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0° 25.0% 10.6114 64.3°1/n 64.3% 10,7% 64.4% 64.4% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse None None None None Nare Max Max Nane Max Max Aat Eftct Green (s) 16.8 16.6 16.E 16,6 16.6 16.6 56.4 58.4 83.4 58.6 53.5 53.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.19 0.19 0,19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.66 0,60 0.60 0.66 0,60 0.60 vie Ratio 0,84 0.07 0.32 0.21 0,07 0.29 0.62 0.75 0,07 0.48 0.93 0.11 Control Delay 62.6 30.0 8.3 32.4 30.0 8.6 26.7 18.6 1.8 10.4 32.6 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 6.0 6,0 0.0 o.0 0.4 0.0 OA 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.6 30.0 8.3 32.4 30.0 8.5 25.7 18,6 1,8 10.0 32.5 1.5 LOS E C A C C A C B A A C A App, cauh Letay 41.7 183 18,5 27,5 Approach LOS D B B C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih. 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 88.6 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Ratlo: 0.93 Inteisecllan Signal Delay25.5 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 88,21, ICU Level of SeNcc P Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases:} 5: Route 11 & Pua uaanui St 01 1 €Z 05 7 06 0;3 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 PM VV 5; Route 11 & Puapuaanui St 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. LBT EBR '4VBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT 14BR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t iif I + t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 199 13 116 51 23 104 145 610 60 142 1016 100 Future Volume {vehih) 199 23 116 51 23 104 105 810 60 142 1016 100 initial Q (02b), veal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1 A0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1670 1870 1670 1870 1$70 1826 1870 1855 1649 1870 1870 1871 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 216 25 0 53 25 0 114 835 0 146 1047 Ci Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.+92 0.92 0.97 0,92 0,07 0.92 0.97 0,97 0.97 0,97 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, °!c 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 ? 4 2 £ 2 Cap, vehlh 326 350 32€1 350 234 1122 365 1135 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.19 •0.00 0.05 0.50 100 Q.06 0.61 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1380 1870 1585 1386 3870 1547 1751 1856 1560 1751 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vef fh 216 25 G 53 25 0 114 835 0 146 1047 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 13BG 1870 1585 1386 18701 1547 1751 1856 1560 1781 1870 1555 0 Serves -s), s 13.4 1.0 O.G 2.9 1.0 0.0 2.1 28.5 U-0 2.7 44.1 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 14.4 1.0 0.0 3.9 1,0 0.0 2.1 28.5 0.0 2,7 44,1 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh h 326 350 326 350 234 1122 365 1135 VJC Ratio(X) 0.66 0.07 0.16 0.07 0,49 0.74 0.40 0.92 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 349 381 349 381 240 1122 370 1135 HCM Platuon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 13.@0 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 35.5 29.8 0.0 31.2 29.6 0.0 19.3 12.5 0,L' 11.5 15,5 0.0 her Decay (d2). siveh 4.3 0.1 0.0 4.2 0.1 0.0 1.6 4,5 0,0 0.7 13.6 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.8 0.4 0.4 1.0 0,4 0.0 1,5 11.7 0.0 1.0 20.4 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 39.8 29.6 0.0 31.4 29.6 0.0 20.9 17.0 0.0 12.2 29.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C C C C B B C Approauh Vol, veli h 241 A 78 A 94R A 1193 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 38.7 30.8 17.5 27.0 Approach LOS D C B C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.4 57.9 21.0 9.2 58.1 21.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.1 53A 18.0 5.0 53.5 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 4.7 30.5 16,4 44.1 46.1 5.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 6.7 0.1 0.0 4.5 0.1 tntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 21.L HChA 6th LOS C; N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Phgh 11 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2024 PM 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakim Stroot 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht Fly)' s•veh 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions H M 95th %file 0(veh) r t + r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 0 325 340 979 1120 0 Future Vol, vehlh 0 325 340 979 1120 0 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - None - YWd Storage Length 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclor 98 96 98 98 98 98 Heavy Veh?cies, % 5 2 2 3 2 6 MAvint Flow 0 332 347 999 1143 0 majorlKha 6111102 MOM Mai Conllicbng Flaw AJI 2836 1143 0 - 0 Stage 1 1143 - - - - - Stage 2 1893 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.48 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.48 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.48 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 - 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Mammar 18 0 611 - - Stage 1 296 0 - - 5lage 2 158 0 Platoon bluGied,'k - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 8 - 611 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 8 - - - - Stage 1 128 Stage 2 158 . . Approach m N6 so HGM Control Delay, s 0 4.7 0 HCM LOS A mhor UrWmajor MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 611- HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,568 - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 18.3 - 0 0 HGNI Lane LDS C - A A - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) 3.6 - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tin7ir4l,b 202' PVI (; RULIte} 1 & -�ko Strr ! lL kc� S`r et 1 12.7721 '',, '--W Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET DIEL NBT S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1 1 T4 + T Traffic Volume (vph) 148 30 52 39 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Future Volume (vph) 148 30 fit 39 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pt NA Perm pm4pt PSA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 5 6 Detected Phase 4 4 6 a 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,4 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (8) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9,5 78.0 78.0 17,9 85.5 85.5 Total SPI it(%) 16.155 16.1% 16.1% 16.1% 6,89!4 55.7'9 55.7°x6 12.1% 61.1% 61.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 110 1.0 110 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,6 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Oplirnize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effut Green (s) 15.7 15.7 14,0 14,01 78:8 73.7 73.7 9€1.8 83.4 33.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 0.12 a.10 9.10 0.59 0.55 0.55 H8 0,62 0.62 rile Ratio 0.76 0.34 0.35 0.87 0,33 0.94 0.07 0.37 0.92 14.19 Control Delay 81.3 30.0 61.3 50.1 17,5 47.0 0.3 91.2 38,5 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total allay 51.3 3D.0 61.3 50,1 17.5 47.0 4.3 81.2 3a,5 5.5 LOS F C E D E ID A F L) A App, cauh Letay 63.0 52.3 43.0 41.6 Approach LOS F D 0 C I'nterson Summa Cycle Length: 14Q Actuated Cycle Length: 134 Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type; ,Actuated-Uncoordinaled Maximum vac Ratio: 0.97 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay: 44.9 Intersection LOS. Q Inter tion Capacity UN zation 98.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street )Laky Street 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page, 13 H M 6th Signalized Intc--rsoction SUn-ima{y 2024 PM W T; Route 111 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11:12.2021 --* t 10`` I'4layament EBS. EBT EER WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 T V t T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 202 1Q23 190 Future Volume {vehih) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Initial Qi (02b), vets 0 0 G 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.CG 1.00 1.G0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1.a0 1.00 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,90 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1850 1870 1856 1870 1M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 154 31 0 65 41 0 39 955 0 210 1{106 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 OX 4.96 0,96 0,96 0. 6 0,96 0,96 0.96 0,96 0,96 Percent Meavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? P 3 f C Gap,vehl11 183 196 94 96 228 1181 309 1244 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.1;3 0.00 0.05 0.05 •0.110 0.03 0.54 O.00 0.06 0.56 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1326 0 1767 1856 1555 1767 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 154 31 G 65 41 0 39 455 C, 210 1066 0 Grp Sat Flovv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 18M 1585 1767 1870 1585 0 Serves -s), s 10.5 1.8 Q -G 4.4 2.7 4.0 0.9 47.0 U-0 4.9 54,1 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 10.5 1.8 H 4.4 2,7 0,0 0.9 47.0 61,0 4,9 54.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.0G 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Ct0 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 183 196 94 96 228 1181 309 1244 VIC Ratio(X) 0.84 0A 6 0.89 0.43 0.17 0.81 6,68 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 259 276 263 270 248 1181 387 1244 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.40 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 53:5 49.7 C1_0 56.7 55.9 0.0 18.3 1 P_6 0,0 20.8 15,9 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 15.5 0.4 C1,0 8,8 3.4 0.0 GA 6.0 0,0 3.4 7.7 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0 1) 0.0 0.4 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehrfln 5.4 0.9 0,0 22 1.3 4.0 M 21),5 0.0 3.7 23.7 i}.0 Unsig. Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 69.0 50.0 0,0 65.5 58.9 0.0 18.6 22.6 0.0 24.3 23.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D E E B C C C Appfcat h Val, veli h 165 A 106 A 994 A 1276 A Approach Delay, s,veh 65.8 63.0 22.5 23.8 Approach LCIS E E C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 5 8 PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.6 82.0 17.2 8.2 85.5 10.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 12.5 73.5 1810 5.0 81.0 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 6.9 49.0 12.5 2.9 56.1 6.4 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.3 8.6 0.3 0,0 10.4 0.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 27,9 HChA 6th LOS C; N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Tiniir.gb 2021 PM 8. Rc�lte 1` Cr>I�v >Ilr�ll�a III Road 1 i :1212021 Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: 6. Koute 11 # Karn unameha III KWU I tat 06 133 • 07 1 tO8 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 16 -- 1 t Large Group EBT EER WBT N'BL NBT SBL 54aT_ _ Lane Configuratians 4 r +14 1 T I ft Traffic Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 597 19 501 Future Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 597 19 601 Turn Type NA Perm NA Eget MA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 11 3 8 7 4 Permitbad Phases 2 Qetectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 9.5 23.5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.5 30.5 30.0 4.6 35.0 9.5 34.9 Total SPI it(%) 29.0°la 29.E 28.6% 9.1% 33.3% 9.0% 33.2% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{1 7.0 1,0 I'D 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead,tag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Gptlrnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Nene Nave Max None Max Act Effut Green (s) 21.0 .71.0 6.8 5,3 35.6 5.2 31.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0.28 4.28 0.09 0.07 0.47 0.07 0.42 rile Ratio 0.75 0.11 0.24 0,54 0.74 0.17 0.66 Control Delay 36.8 1.0 26.0 57.5 28.4 42.2 21.7 Queue Delay 0.0 Q.O 17.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 D.0 Total aolay 36.8 1.0 26.0 57,5 28.4 42.2 21,7 LOS D A C E C 1D C App, cauh Deiay 32.1 26.a 31.2 22.1 Approach LOS C C 0 C Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglth:105 Actuated Cycle Length; 75.6 Natural Cycle: 105 Control Type; Semi Act-Llncoord I'viaximum u c Rat o: 0.75 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay. 27.1 Intersectlan LOS: C Intemdon Capaci#y Utilization 73.3% ICU Level of 5eNce D Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: 6. Koute 11 # Karn unameha III KWU I tat 06 133 • 07 1 tO8 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 16 FIC;Pr1 6,11 Sir;rtalizod Ir-tt�rsoctiori Surilnla-y 2021 PK/I VV 8; ROUte 1 III Road 1 12:2721 l ament EBL > EBR 1NBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SO Lane Configurations r :k 1 +T Traffic Volume (vehfh) 335 11 52 7 11 21 64 597 11 19 601 319 Future Volume ;wehih) 335 11 52 7 11 21 64 597 11 19 501 319 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.Ofl 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1,00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 1855 1767 1B11 1870 9$70 1870 18556 1850 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 353 12 D 7 12 22 67 626 12 20 633 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0,95 0,95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 9 5 2 2 2 3 ? 2 2 2 2 Gap,vehl11 413 14 11 19 35 90 600 15 41 1467 Arrive On Gruen 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.04 0.04 •0.04 0.05 0.44 0.44 0.02 -D.41 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1630 55 1535 289 495 908 1767 1815 35 1781 3647 0 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 365 D Pr 41 0 0 67 t0 690 20 533 0 Grp Bat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 1685 0 1535 1692 0 4 1767 0 1849 1781 1777 0 0 Serves -s), s 15.2 p_0 D.0 i.8 0.0 0.0 2.8 0.0 21.8 0.8 9.4 0,0 Cycle fD clear(g_c), s 15.2 0.0 H 1.8 10 0.0 2.8 0.D 21.8 0.8 9,4 10 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.00 0.17 0.54 1.00 0,02 1.00 0.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh ih 427 0 65 0 0 90 D 815 41 1467 VJC Ratio(X) 0.85 0-00 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.75 0.04 0.79 0,49 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 595 0 5N 0 0 122 D 815 121 1467 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1t]D 1,00 1.00 1,(10 1.40 1.00 1,04 1.01 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.04 1.00 01.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 L1.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 26.2 0.0 0-0 34.9 0-0 0.0 34.5 0.0 17.6 35.6 15.4 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 8.6 0.0 0.4 9.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 0.0 7.5 8.9 0.9 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 6.8 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.4 1,5 0.0 9,4 0.4 3.4 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 34.5 0.0 0.0 44.4 0.0 H 49.8 0.4 2.5.1 44.5 16.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A 0 A C D B Appfcauh Vol, veli h 365 A 41 707 653 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 34.8 44.4 27.4 17,2. Approach LOS C D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 23.2 8.2 14.9 7.3 6.2 37.{] Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 5.1 30.4 25.5 5.0 30.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (9-c+1 1). s 17.2 4.8 11,4 3,8 2,8 23.8 Green Ext Tome (p ), s 115 0.0 3.7 0.1 10.0 z tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 25.E HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBRI is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 K -.,M 6, 11 T' VSC. 202,1 -DM VV 9: Route, 1' & Rayed Vistab 1` 122 K2I Iniefseclion Int 1.4 movement WBL ' BR NBT NBR 3BL SBT Ldno Gon figural ions MCM Control Delay (s) r t r HCtwf Lane LDS t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 12 39 979 41 45 1067 Future Vol, vehih 12 39 979 41 45 1067 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - Norge Storage Length fl 0 - 540 540 - Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - B - - 0 Peaak Hour Faclor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MAvint Flow 13 42 1064 45 49 1160 MajerlKha M1mrr1 Ma]6r1 NO CnntlictrngFlaw AJI 2322 1C&I 0 0 1109 0 Stage 1 1064 - - - - - Slage 2 1258 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 J.22 - - 4.12 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.31$ - - ?-.218 Poo CW1 Mar mver 41 271 - - 630 Stage 1 332 Slage 2 26.8 - _ _ _ _ Platoon bluGied, ''k - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver 36 271 - 634 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuvar 38 - Slage 1 332 Stage 2 247 . Approxh via N6 SB HCM Control Delay, s 49.5 0 0.5 HCM LOS E mhor LarWmajor MM vmt NBT NBRWBLAlWBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veWh) - - .38 271 636 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - - 0.343 0.156 0.078 - MCM Control Delay (s) - - 142.9 20,7 11.2 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F C S HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - 1.1 0,1-1 4,3 - 5.04 pm Baseline Synchre 14 Report Page 19 Tin7ir4l,b 20124 AM W Frotocted RoLIte3 1 �C.iak rl Strc.-ot 1 12:7721 -v i-01 Large Group EBR NBL NBT SET SBR Lane Configuratians e ' t t r Traffic Volume (vph) 150 602 914 932 2 Future Volume (vph) 159 602 914 932 2 Turn Type Perm Prat NA NA Perm Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permibd Phases 4 6 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.a 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 51.0 127.5 M5 75.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0°la 34.01A 85.0% 51.0% 51.0x1, Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 160 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 Q.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode N::ne Bore Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 5.5 46.5 1210 72.0 72.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.04 0.34 D.a9 0.52 0.52 vie Ratio 0.33 1.08 0.61 1.06 Ho Control Delay 1.8 103.8 15 78.2 10.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,D Do 0.0 Total Do4ay 1.$ 103.6 3.5 78.2 10.5 LOS A F A E E App, cauh Delay 43.3 78.1 Approach LOS D E Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 137.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Unroord Nlaximum 0c Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 53.2 Intersection LOS. Q Intersection Capacity Utilization 89ZA ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period [min) 15 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Inttorsection SLfrTtmaFy 2024 AM W Protected 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakim Strout 11117f2021 -.A --t t l ./ EBL EER NBL *NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations 2 i"' 5 t t 127.5 Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 159 U2 914 932 2 Future Volume ;wehih) 0 159 602 914 932 2 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.1}0 1.00 1.00 1.015 Work Zane On Approach No No Na Act $at Row, veh1hin 1870 1841 1670 11326 1826 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 6.47 983 1002 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 OX 0.93 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, °!c 2 2 5 7 Cep, vehlh 1 650 1761 1031 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.36 0,66 0,56 -7.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1560 1781 1820 3826 1522 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 647 983 1002 0 Grp Sat P1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1560 1781 1526 1826 1522 Q Serve{sem,}, s 0.0 0-0 46-2 5.i 67-5 0.0 Cycle 0 Clear(g_cj, s 0.0 0,0 46.2 5.2 67.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.Ca 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, veh h 1 650 1761 3031 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 UD 0,56 097 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 650 1781 1031 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.x 1.00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 40-4 0.2 26.8 0.0 Inc= Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 34.2 1.3 22.0 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0 1) 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 0.0 0.0 26.1 0.6 34.1 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0A 74,6 t.6 48.8 0,0 LnGrp LOS A E A D Appfoat;h Val, veb!h 0 A 1630 1002 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 30,5 48.8 Approach LOS C D Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 51.0 75.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 1$A 46.5 72.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+11), s 7.2 0.0 •18.2 09.5 Green Ext -roma (pc), s 11.6 0.0 0.0 1,7 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 37.5 HChA 6th LOS U N otes Unsignaiized De:,6y fn? [EBR S8R(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2024 AM VV Pe:rriiissive 0. ROLL te} 1 & �C.iak n trc.-ot 1;,12.7721 -v i-01 Large Group EBR NBL NBT SET SBR Lane Configuratians if I t t r Traffic Volume (vph) 159 002 914 932 2 Future Volume (vphj 159 602 914 932 2 Turn Type Perm Perm NA NA Perm Protecled Phases 2 0 Permitlad Phases 4 2 0 Di3tectad Phase 4 2 2 0 E Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 22,5 Total Split (s) 22,5 127.5 127,5 127,5 127.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 85.D% 85.0% 85.0% 85.E Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 110 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Recall Mode None Max Max Max Max Act Effct Careen (s) 6,1 123.0 123.0 123.0 123.4 Actuated grO Ratio 0,04 0.89 D.a9 0.89 0.89 vie Ratio 0.61 1.47 0.51 H2 0A0 Control Delay 12.3 241.8 3.7 3.9 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,D 6.0 6.0 Total Do42y 12.3 241.8 3.7 3.9 4,5 LOS B F A A A App, cauh Letay 98,2 3.9 Approach LOS 1= A Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Atuale�! Cycle Length. 138.2 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum ulc Rato: A7 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay: 59.2 Intersection LCIS. P Intemdon Capacity lJolizatiorh 89.9k ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 5.00 pm Baselire Synchro 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Irttorsection SUmma{y 2024 AM W Permissive 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakim Strout 11112f2021 -.A --t t l ./ EBL EER NBL NET SBT SBR Lane Configurations 2 i"' 6 t 127.5 0.0 Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 159 U2 914 932 2 Future Volume ;vehih) 0 159 602 914 932 2 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 HCl`A 6th LOS 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. Do 1.00 1.00 1.015 Work Zane On Approach No No Na Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1841 1670 11326 1826 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 6.47 983 1002 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,83 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 5 5 7 Cep, vehlh 1 575 1761 1761 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 {i.a6 0.96 0,96 •9.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1560 552 1826 3026 1522 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 647 983 1002 to Grp Sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1781 1560 562 1826 1826 1522 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 117.5 5.2 5.5 0.0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, 5 0.0 0.0 123.0 52 5,5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 1 575 1761 1761 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 1.13 0,56 057 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 575 1781 1761 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.x 1,00 1.00 1.170 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 10-3 0.2 0.2 0.0 hor Decay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 77.1 1.3 1.3 0.0 In!t al Q Del ay(d3),srveh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 +0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 2111 0.6 0.7 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 87.0 1.5 1.5 0.l} LnGrp LOS A F A A Appfoat h Val, veb!h 0 A 1630 1002 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 35.8 1.5 Approach LOS D A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 127.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 18.0 123.4 Max Q Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 125.0 U.0 7.5 Green Ext Tome f p c), s 0.0 0.0 12:1 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 22.? HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 202' HM VW PFO FUMT 6. RoLr tc, 1 & �C.iak n trc:ot 1 If 2 -ill _V Large Group EBR NBL NBT 5BT ;SBR Lane Configuratians e ' t t r Traffic Volume (vph) 159 602 914 932 2 Future Volume (vph) 159 602 914 932 2 Turn Type Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permitlad Phases 4 2 6 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22,5 .22.5 22,5 Total Split (s) 22.5 47,0 127,5 KS 80.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 31.30(a 85.0% 53.7% 53.7° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 A l -Red Tirm (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost '1 im (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yat Ides Recall Mode Nene Nave Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 5.5 123.0 123.0 7B.tl 76.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0. CX 0.89 0.a9 0.55 0.55 vie Ratio 0.35 1.08 0.51 1100 Ho Control Delay 2.0 97.9 3.5 599 9.5 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 G,0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 2.0 97.9 3.5 59.8 9,5 LOS A F A E A App, cauh Letay 40.9 59.7 Approach LOS a E Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 137.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord I'viaximum 0c Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Nlay. 45.3 Intersection LOS. Q Intemdon Capaci#y Utiliaaton 89,9°, ILLI Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street //-�� 0L VEILA 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Irttorsection SUmma{y 2024 AM W ProtPerm 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakim Strout 11117f2021 -.A --t t l ./ EBL EER NBL NET SBT SBR Lane Configurations i"' f Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 150 U2 914 932 2 Future Volume ;vehih) 0 150 602 914 932 2 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.1}0 1.00 1.00 1.{00 Work Zane On Approach No No Na Act $at Row, veh1hin 1,870 1841 1670 11326 1826 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 6.47 983 1002 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 OX 0.93 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, °!c 2 2 5 7 Cep, veblh 1 680 1761 1188 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.28 0,66 0,65 -7.00 Sat Flow, vehlh 1781 1560 1781 1820 3826 1522 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 647 983 1002 0 Grp Sat P1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1560 1781 1626 1826 1522 Q Serve{sem,}, s 0.0 0.0 31.9 5.i 54.2 0.0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, s 0.0 0.0 31.9 5.2 54.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1X 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, veh h 1 686 1761 1188 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 D.95 0,56 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 777 1781 1188 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.x 1.00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.000 0.40 1.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 35-4 0.2 17.2 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 20.1 1,3 7,4 0.0 In!t al Q Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 23.1 0.5 23.5 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0A 55.4 1.5 24.6 0,0 LnGrp LOS A E A C Appfoat h Val, veli h 0 A 1630 1002 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 22,9 24.5 Approach LOS C C Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 40.0 87.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 923.0 18,0 42.5 76.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+11), s 7.2 0.0 33.9 56.2 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 11.6 0.0 1.6 8A tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 23.5 HCM 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized De:,6y fn? [EBR SBRI is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2024 P 'W Frr)te:cted Rt rite: 1 & �C.iakiri� Street 1 i : 12,2 021 Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street Qc J # OF - 04 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 I t Large Group EBR N13L NBT SET' Lane CDnfiguratians a ' t t Traffic Volume (vph) 325 340 979 1120 Future Volume (vph) 325 340 979 1120 Turn Type Perm Prat NA NA Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permibd Phases 4 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 33.4 127,5 94.1 Total SPI it(%) 15.0°la 22.3° B5.0% 62.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 All -Red Tirne (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None Bare Max Max Act Eftct Green (s) 8.9 28.9 123.2 89.7 Actuated grO Ratio O.OG 4.20 D.87 0,64 vie Rabb 0,81 0.96 11.62 0.97 Control Delay 22.2 92.7 U 44.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 Total Df:lay 22.2 92.7 5.0 44,2 LOS C F A D App, cauh Delay 27.6 44.2 Approach LOS S D Intersection Summery C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 141.1 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type; Semi Act-Unroord Maximum Oc Ratio: 0.97 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay. 33.7 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter eon Capacity UWizallion 86.81A ILLI Level of 5eNce E Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street Qc J # OF - 04 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 PM w Protected 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11J12f2021 EBL EER NBL NET SBT SBR Lane Configurations I r 5 f t r TraffrcVolurne (vehfh) 0 325 340 979 1120 0 Future Volume ;vehlh) 0 325 340 979 1120 0 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 Parking 8us. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1781 1870 1870 1856 1$70 1911 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 347 999 1 143 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.95 0.98 0,08 0,98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 373 1790 1347 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.21 0,66 0,72 •0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 1787 1856 3870 1535 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 347 999 1143 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1597 1585 1781 1856 1876 1535 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 24,4 5.2 513.1 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 24.4 5.2 56.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.134 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 1 3T3 1790 1347 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 0.93 0.56 0.85 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 404 1790 1347 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 U10 1.00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.40 0.40 UG 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), shell 0.0 0.0 49.5 0.2 12.8 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 27.1 1.3 5.8 0.0 In!t al Q Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 0.4 0.0 13,E 0,6 23.2 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 76.6 1.4 19.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS A E A a Appfoauh Vol, vett h 0 A 1346 1143 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 201,8 19.7 Approach LOS C B' Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 31.2 96.3 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 1$A 28.9 88.§ Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 7.2 0.0 26.4 58.1 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 12.0 0.0 0.3 13.2 tnte-fsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 20.: HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Tin7ir(l,b 2024 PM VV Pe:rriiissive 0. ROLL te} 1 �C.iak rte Street 1 i : 12,2 021 Analysis Period (min) 15 5.00 pm Baselire Synchre 10 Report Page 1 I t Large Group EBR N13L NBT SET` Lane CDnfiguratians r t t Traffic Volume (vph) 325 340 879 1120 Future Volume (vph) 325 340 979 1120 Turn Type Perm Perrin NA NA Protecled Phases 2 0 Permibd Phases 4 2 D9tectad Phase 4 2 2 0 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 Total Split (s) 22.5 127.5 127,5 127,5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 85.D% B5.0% 85.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 110 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Recall Mode None Max Max Max Act Effct Careen (s) 17.9 123.0 123.0 123.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 4.82 D.K U2 vie Ratio 0.87 1.31 0,66 035 Control Delay 72.1 184.3 7.8 10.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.0 Total Df�12y 72.1 184.3 7,5 1D.1 LOS E F A B App, cauh Deiay 53.3 10,1 Approach LOS D E Intersection Summery C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuale�! Cycle Length. 149.8 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Unroord Maximum vlc Rato: Inteisectlan Signal delay; 38.0 Intersection LOS. Q Intemdon Capimity Utilization 86,6*A ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 5.00 pm Baselire Synchre 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2024 PM VW Permissive 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11112f2021 EBL EER NBL NET SBT SBR Lane Configurations I r f t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 325 34D 979 1120 0 Future Volume ;vehlh) 0 325 340 979 1120 0 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Dat Row, veh1hin 17811 1870 1870 1856 1$70 1911 Adj Eloy Rate,. vehlh 0 0 347 999 1 143 0 Peak Hour Factor €,1.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,08 0,98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 504 1790 1E104 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.� o 0.96 0.96 •0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 492 1855 3870 1535 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 347 999 1143 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1507 1585 492 1856 1876 1535 Q Serve{sus}, s 0.0 0_0 27.7 5.2 7-1 0.0 Cycle 0E dear(g_c), 5 0.0 0.0 34.7 5.2 7.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 IIX 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 1 504 1790 1804 VJC Ratio(X) 0.00 0.59 156 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 5114 1790 1804 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.011 1,00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 0.0 0.0 1'a 0.2 0.2 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 7.8 1.3 1.7 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 1.4 0,6 0.9 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 9.3 1.4 1.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1346 1143 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 3.5 1.9 Approach LOS A A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 127.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123,0 18.0 123.4 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s JG.7 0.0 9.1 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 24.4 4.0 17.1 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 2. HCl`A 6th LOS A N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is exciudL4d from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Tin7ir(l,b 2024 PM W ProtPerm 0. ROLL tc 1 & �C.iakiri� Street 1 i : 12,2 021 Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street ! 01 /� L+4 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 I t Large Group EBR NBL NBT SI6T Lane Configuratians e + t Traffic Volume (vph) 325 340 979 1120 Future Volume (vph) 325 340 979 1120 Turn Type Perm prn+pt NA NA Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permibd Phases 4 2 Detected Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.6 29.0 127.4 9$.4 Total SPI it(%) 15.1% 19.3x'3 84.9% 65.6% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 160 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 X3.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 10.2 120.0 123.0 94.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.07 0.86 D.86 0.66 vie Ratio 0.84 0.97 0.53 0,93 Control Delay 28.9 86.8 5.5 36.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 Total Df:lay 25,9 56 8 5.5 36.0 LOS C F A D App, cauh Letay 26.4 36.0 Approach LOS C D Intersection Summery C�Qle LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 142.2 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Un000rd Maximum 0c Rato: 0.97 Inteisectlan Signal relay; 30,8 Intersectlan LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilizaton 86.6% ILLI Level of 5eNce E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street ! 01 /� L+4 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Surnmary 2024 PM W ProtPerm 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11!12.2021 f ./ EBL EER NBL NET SBT SBR Lane Configurations I r 5 f t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 325 34D 979 1120 0 Future Volume ;vehlh) 0 325 340 979 1120 0 Initial Q (0b), veal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1781 1870 1870 1856 1$70 1911 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 347 999 1143 0 Peak Hour Factor €,11.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0,08 0,98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 479 1790 1£65 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.04 0,96 C"89 •0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 1781 1856 3870 1595 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 347 999 1143 0 Grp Bat Flovv(s),vehlhlln 1697 1585 1781 1856 1876 1535 0 Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 1.7 5.2 22.0 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 0.0 O'D 1,7 5.2 22.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.0a 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 1 479 1790 1665 VJC Ratio(X) 0.00 172 156 0.89 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 241 752 1790 1665 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.011 1.00 1.00 1.170 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 7.9 0.2 2.0 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 2.1 1.3 23 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 U.0 0.0 u.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 4A 4.6 4.0 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 10.0 1.4 4.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS A A A A Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1346 1143 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 3.6 4.3 Approach LOS A A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.4 0.0 9.5 117.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 122.9 118,1 24.5 93.9 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 7.2 0,0 3.7 24.0 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 12..0 U.0 1.0 16.5 tnte-fsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 3.9 HCl`A 6th LOS A N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is exciudL4d from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Tin7ir(l,b 20124 AM W Frotocted (; Rc rete} 1 -�ko Strr ! 1L kc� S:r t 1 12:7721 '',, --*, I !* Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET NSL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1� T4 ' + r f Traffic Volume (vph) 281 48 59 36 33 927 55 1f54 787 146 Future Volume (vph) 281 48 fig 36 33 927 55 164 787 146 Turn Type Prat NA Piot NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 2Z5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 28.1 22.5 23.6 9,5 75.2 75.2 14,2 79,9 79.9 Total SPI it(%) 19.3% 20.1°x, 16.1OX i6.A 6.89!4 53.7'9 53.7"A 10.1 No 57.1% 57A Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{1 110 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tirt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? 'Yes Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None Nave None Max Max None Max Max Act Effut Green (s) 22.5 37.7 11.2 19.1 75.7 70.7 70.7 84.9 77.3 77.3 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 0.23 0.08 0.14 0.54 0.50 0.50 0.61 0.55 0,55 vie Ratio 1.05 0.29 a52 1.06 0;19 1.05 0.07 1.43 0. a2 0.17 Control Delay 123.3 32.3 74.3 101,0 13.9 77.1 0.2 112.1 34.7 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Q.0 n 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 123.3 32.3 74,3 191,0 13.9 77,1 0.2 112.1 3437 5.4 LOS F C E F E E A F C A App, cauh Deiay 96.0 %.4 70.9 413 Approach LOS I= F EN 0 Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglthi 140 Actuated Cyde Length: 140 Natural Cyde: 140 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Rato:1.06S Inteiseclian Signal Delay: 67.2 Intersectlon LOS E Inter tion Capacity U61izalion 106.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 & Laka Street 1ako Street Di l l� t _ti --- 411- 07 11- 077 n � 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-ima{y 2024 AM W Protected T Route 11 & Lako Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBI_ EBT M WBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 T4 E" Traffic Volume (vehfh) 281 48 59 59 36 294 33 827 55 164 787 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 281 48 89 69 36 299 33 827 55 164 787 146 initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.04 1.00 1.010 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1874 1570 1856 1870 1810 1870 1870 1441 1821 165G 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 299 51 0 73 38 0 35 888 0 174 837 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 4.94 0.94 8,94 4.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Cap, vehlh 321 311 101 81 291 1075 212 1121 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.17 0.00 0.06 O.D4 0.00 0.03 4.57 UOQ 0.06 D.69 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 15610 1725 1850 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vef fh 209 51 G 73 38 0 35 986 0 174 837 0 Grp Sat F7ovv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 20.6 2.41 Q.G 5.1 2.5 0.0 1.4 59.2 0.0 5.0 40.6 0,4 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, 5 20.6 2.9 H 5.1 2,5 0.0 1.0 591 0.0 5.0 40.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 O.DG 1.04 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veO 321 311 141 81 291 1075 212 1121 VJC Ratio(X) 0.93 0.18 0,72 0.47 0,12 0.92 &82 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 331 354 255 286 312 1475 248 11121 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,m 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 11,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.00 Uniform Delay (d), cMh 50.4 44.6 0.0 57.9 58,3 0.0 15.8 23.8 O.0 28.2 17,8 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 32.9 0.2 4,0 9,2 4.1 0.0 D.2 13.5 t],4 17.1 4.6 0.6 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacic=(50°l9),vehfln 12.1 1.4 0.0 2.5 1.3 0,4 DA 28.8 0.0 4.0 18.0 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 83.3 44.8 0.0 67,0 62.4 0.0 161.0 37.4 0.0 45.3 22.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D E E B D D C Appreauh Vol, veli h 350 A 111 A 1021 A 1011 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 77.7 65.4 36.7 25.3 Approach LOS F E D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.6 76.3 11.7 25.3 8.0 79.9 27.0 9.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 9.7 703 1H 216 5.0 75,4 22.5 19.1 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 7.0 81.2 7.1 4.9 3.0 42.6 22.6 4.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 5.1 0.1 42 0.0 7.5 0.0 0.1 Intefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 39.5 HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tinrirtl,b 2024 AM VV P(:rniissive (; RULte} 1 & -�iko'Strr t 1L&ko S:r et 1 12:7721 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NSL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 11 T4 ' + r f Traffic Volume (vph) 281 48 59 36 33 927 55 1f54 787 146 Future Volume (vph) 281 48 fig 36 33 927 55 164 787 146 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. NA I7m+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitlrad Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Qetectc,r Phase 4 4 S 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 57.0 57.0 5710 57.0 9,5 71.0 71.0 12.4 73.5 73,5 Total SPI it(%) 40.7% 40.7% 4G1% 40.7% 6.8°7a 50.7'9 50.7% 8.6% 52,5% 52.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Tatar Lost Tirt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode Nano None Nene None Nacre FA ax Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 52.5 52.5 52.5 52.5 73.5 66.5 66.5 78.9 70.9 7U Actuated grC Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.35 0,38 0,51 0.49 0.48 0.55 0.51 0,51 vie Raba 1.17 0.18 0.16 0,52 027 1.12 0.08 1.24 0.90 0.18 Control Delay 148.7 16.2 30,4 23,0 19.2 102.1 7.4 184.4 45.5 7.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 a.0 0.0 0,0 Total Delay 148.7 16.2 31,4 23,0 19,2 102,1 7.4 164.4 45.5 7.7 LOS F B C C ® F A F D A App, cauh Delay 109.9 14.3 94.3 61.2 Approach LOS I= C F E Intersection Summa Cycle Lei glthi 140 Actuated Cyde Length: 140 Natural Cyde: 140 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Rato:1.24 Interseclion Signal Delay: 74.3 lnter'se-tiori LOS E Intemdon Capacity Utilization 108,9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street 11* 01 I oz "v 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Srlmmarn y 2024 AM VV Permissive T Route 11 & Lako Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11112.2021 I'4layament EBI_ EBT M WBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 T4 i* Traffic Volume (vehfh) 281 48 59 59 36 294 33 927 55 164 787 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 281 48 69 69 36 299 33 827 55 164 787 146 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.011 1.04 1.00 1_CIO 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1449 1811 185G 1870 Adj Flour Rake,. vehlh 299 51 0 73 38 0 35 BE 0 174 837 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 4.94 0.94 8,94 0.94 0,94 D.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Cap, vehlh 390 478 3761 478 291 1067 213 1113 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.00 0,26 0.26 0.110 0.03 0.57 U OC 0.06 0.69 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 136T 1870 {l 1341 3870 0 1781 1870 15610 1725 1850 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 299 51 C• 73 38 0 35 RH 0 174 837 0 Grp Sat F7ovv(s),veh!hiln 1367 1870 0 1341 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1858 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 24.8 2.4 D.G 5.1 1.8 0.0 0.9 55.8 U-0 4.8 38.3 O,Q Cycle 01 Gear(g_cj, 5 26.6 2.4 0.f} 7.6 1,8 0.0 0.9 55.8 0,0 4.8 38.3 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 DX 1.04 0.00 1-00 1,04 1.170 1.00 Lam Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 390 478 376 478 291 1067 213 1113 VJC Ratio(X) 0.77 0,11 0.19 0.08 0.12 0.92 0.82 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 657 843 638 843 316 1087 224 1113 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,0{1 1.00 1.00 1.110 1•Q0 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.90 0.70 1.00 1.04 0. DO 1.00 1.00 11.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 43.1 33.2 0.0 38.1 33.0 0.0 15.1 22.7 0.0 20.5 17,0 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 3.2 0.1 0.4 4.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 14.4 0.0 19.9 4.7 0.0 In!r at Q Del ay(d3),srveh 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacic=(54°l9),vehfln 87 1.1 0.0 1.7 0.8 0.4 0.4 27.2 0.0 3.9 16.8 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 48.3 33.3 0.0 36A 33.0 0.0 15,21 37.1 0.0 46.4 21.7 11.0 LnGrp L05 D C D C B D D C Appreauh Vol, vett h 350 A 111 A 1021 A 1011 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 44.4 35.2 35.4 26.0 Approach LOS D D D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 .6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 71.4 34.3 7.9 74.4 34.3 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,6 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s T5 66.5 52.5 5.0 619.0 52.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6.8 57.8 28,6 2.9 40.3 9.6 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 4.8 1,2 0,0 7.3 0.4 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7irtl,b 2024 HM W PFO POrlT (; RoUtc 1 & -�IkO'Strr t �Lakc) S:reet 1 12:7721 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians T + r t ' Traffic Volume (vph) 281 48 59 36 33 927 55 164 787 146 Future Volume (vph) 281 48 69 36 33 927 55 164 787 146 Turn Type pm+pt ESA pm -pt NA pm+pi NA Perm prn+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 B 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 7 4 u 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9.5 22.5 9,5 225 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 25.0 39.2 10,9 25.1 9.6 84,2 84.2 15.7 90,3 90.3 Total SPI int(%) 16.7% 26.1°x, 7.3% 16.7% 6.49k 56.1% 561.1% 10.5% 60.2% 60..2°x, Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None hoax Max Act Effct Green (s) 45.8 34.7 27.0 20,6 844.8 79.7 79.7 95.4 87.7 87.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0.36 4.23 [1.18 0.14 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.64 0.58 0,58 vie Rabo 1.43 0.29 a3O 1,01 0.16 1.00 0.07 1A0 0.78 0.16 Control Delay 143.7 31.9 43.7 84.6 12.2 62.7 0.1 108.3 30.6 4.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.10 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 103.7 31,9 43,7 81.6 12,2 62.7 0.1 i08,3 30,6 4.9 LOS F C D F B E A F C A App, cauh Deiay 82.7 77.7 57.7 38.8 Approach LOS 1= E E* 17 Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuale�! Cycle Length. 156 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum 0c Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Nlay. 56.7 Intersectlon LOS E Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.E ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street '1411. Di 702 r 3--#r'ti4 s 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-ima{y 2024 AM W ProtPerm T Route 11 & Lako Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11112.2021 I'4layament EBL EBT M 'I BL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I T; T4 E" Traffic Volume (vehfh) 281 48 59 69 M 294 33 927 55 164 787 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 281 48 69 69 36 299 33 827 55 164 787 146 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.D4 0,99 1.00 1.010 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1449 1811 185G 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 299 51 0 73 38 0 35 BE 0 174 837 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 8.94 0.94 0,94 0!94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Gap, vehlh 356 274 193 77 332 1156 251 1183 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.00 0,05 0.f)4 0.110 0.03 0.52 UOQ 0.05 0,54 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1850 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 299 51 G 73 38 0 35 986 0 174 837 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1757 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 29.5 3.2 Q.G 5.2 2.7 0.0 0.9 56.8 U-0 4,$ 39,1 O,Q Cycle 0 Gear(g_c), s 20.5 3.2 H 5.2 2,7 0.0 0.9 56.8 0,0 42 39,1 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.0.0 1.00 0.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.40 Laie Grp Cap(c}, veWh 355 274 193 77 332 11H 251 1193 VJC Ratio(X) 0.84 0.19 0.38 0.50 0,11 0.85 G,69 4.70 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 355 487 193 289 352 1154 3.05 1193 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.110 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.110 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 4.DO 1.00 1.00 11.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 54.3 49.9 C1_0 57.7 62.6 4.0 13.6 20A 0,0 25.9 15,5 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 16.1 0.3 0.0 1.2 4.9 0.0 0.1 8.1 0,0 5.1 3.5 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehfln 11.1 1,S 0.0 2.4 1,4 Q0 DA 2&1 0,0 3.7 18,9 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),slveh 66A 50.3 0.9 %0 67.5 0.0 13.8 283 0.0- 31.1 18.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D E E 6 C C B Appfeauh Vol, veb!h 350 A 111 A 1021 A 1011 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 64.1 61.9 213.1 21.0 Approach LOS E E C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.5 86.9 10.9 24.1 8.1 97.3 25.0 10.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 11,2 79.7 B.4 34.7 5.1 85..8 20.5 20.6 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6.6 58.8 7.2 5,2 2.9 41.1 22.5 4.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 11,.2 8.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 8,0 0.0 0.1 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 31,fS HChA 6th LOS C Notes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir4l,b 2024 AM IN 4 -Lane (; Route: 1 & _�Ikt) StFOCA lL&ko S€reet 1 12:7721 --p- ' *.-- ! Large Group EBL EBT W8L 'WBT NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane CDnfiguratians I 1� T4 ' tf r tt ' Traffic Volume (vph) 281 48 59 36 33 927 55 1f4 787 146 Future Volume (vph) 281 48 fig 36 33 927 55 164 787 146 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pl NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 4 6 8 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 B 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (5) 23.0 23.0 22.5 22.5 9.5 33.5 33.5 11.9 35,0 35.0 Total SPI rt(%) 255.6% 25.6% 25.0% 25.0% 10.6% a72% 37.2% 12.2%a 38,9°.e 38.9TMa Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1,0 I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 too Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None Nave Nene None None FA ax Max None Max Max Act Effut Green (s) 171 17.2 14.9 14,9 34.2 29.2 29.2 38.5 .34.8 34.8 Actuated grC Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.17 0.17 0.40 0.34 0.34 0.45 0.41 0.41 vie Ratio 0.84 0.31 0.24 0.86 0.14 0.82 0.10 0.84 0.59 0.21 Control Delay 56.1 16.8 32.7 38A 15.5 34.0 0.3 53.9 24.3 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 G,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 o.0 O.D 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.1 16,8 32.7 3$.8 15.5 34.0 0.3 53.9 24.3 4,5 LOS E E C D E C A D C A App, cauh Letay 44.8 37.7 31.5 26.1 Approach LOS p D C C Intersedan Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length; 85.9 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi A-A-Llncoord Maximum We Ratio: D_86 Inteiseclian Signal D] lay: 32.1 Intersectlan LOS- C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.7% ILLI Level of Smvice E Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases; 7; Route 11 u Laka Street 1aka Street 01 t02 lroia 05 7 06 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-lrna{y 2024 AM IN 4 -1 -ane T Route 11 & Lako Street 1LLiko Strect 1 U12.202'I I'4layament EBI_ EBT M WBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T V ft if tt r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 281 48 59 59 36 294 33 927 55 164 787 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 281 48 E9 69 36 299 33 927 55 164 787 146 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.04 1.00 1_LI0 1.00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1874 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 1449 1811 165G 1870 Adj Ebur Rake:. vehlh 299 51 0 73 38 0 35 BE 0 174 837 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 4,94 4.94 Q.94 8,94 0!94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cep. vehlh 352 370 116 123 346 143E 338 159D Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.00 0:07 0:07 0A0 0.03 0.40 UQ 0.08 0,45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 3554 15610 1725 35A 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 299 51 G 73 38 D 35 9K G 174 837 0 Grp Sat P1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1777 1550 1725 1763. 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 11.6 1.6 D.G 2:9 1.4 0.0 0.8 16.4 4.D 4,0 12.3 0,4 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, 5 11.5 1.6 U 2.9 1,4 0.0 0,8 16.4 0.0 4,0 12.3 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.04 O.N 1.00 1:40 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 35.2 374 1161 123 346 1438 338 1590 VIC Ratio(X) 0.85 0.14 0.63 0.31 0.10 0.69 0:51 0.53 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 45.9 482 443 469 408 1436 353 1590 HOM Platoon Ratio 1,40 1,00 1.00 1,04 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 4.DO 1.00 1.44 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), c,veb 27.8 23.8 0.0 32.7 ?2.0 0.0 12,1 17.6 O.0 13.1 142 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 11.2 0.2 4,0 5.5 1.4 0.0 0.1 2.7 U 1.2 1,3 0.4 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirtDftD(54°l9),vehrfln 5.8 0.7 0,0 1.A 0.7 0.0 0.3 B.7 4.0 1.5 4.7 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay. slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 39.0 23.9 0.0 38.2 33.4 0.0 12,2 21,).3 4.0 14.3 15.4 0.0 LnGrp L05 D C D C S C B B Appfoauh Vol, veli h 350 A 111 A 1021 A 1011 R Approach Delay, s.,veh 36.8 K.5 20.1 15,2 Approach LOS D D C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 33.5 18.7 7.0 36.9 9.2. Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.5 29.0 18.5 5.0 30.5 18.0 Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 6.0 18.4 13.6 2.6 14.3 4.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 5.0 0.5 0,0 5:4 0.3 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 21,2 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir4l,b 2024 PM Vl+ Protested (; R[ Lite} 1 ` -�ko Strr ! 1L ko S`r et 1 12;2021 --*, ' *.-- t Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N13L NSF NW 4181. WT W Lane Configuratians I 1� T4 + r 1i + Traffic Volume (vph) 148 30 52 39 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Future Volume (vph) 148 30 52 39 37 917 64 202 1423 190 Turn Type Prot NA Prat NA pm+pt NA Perm pry+pt ISA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 7 4 3 a 5 2 2 1 6 & Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimums Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 225 9.5 22.5 2.2.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9,5 78.0 78.0 17,9 85.5 85.5 Total SPI rt(%) 16.155 16.1°x, 16.1% 16.1% 6,89!4 55.79 55.7°x6 12.1% 61.1% 61.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{) 1.0 1,0 110 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 4.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies 'Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effut Careen (s) 15.7 .21.8 103 14.0 78:8 73.7 73.7 911.8 83.4 83.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 0.16 0.a8 0.10 0.59 0.55 0.55 0.68 0.62 0.62 vie Ratio 0.75 0.26 17.48 0.87 0;33 0.94 0.07 0.87 0.92 0.19 Control Delay 81.3 76.3 72.1 50.1 17.5 47.0 0.3 91.2 38,5 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Do4ay 51.3 20.3 72.1 50.1 17.5 47.0 0.3 81,2 X5 5.5 LOS F C E C E a A F C A App, cauh Letay 62,3 543 43.0 41.6 Approach LOS E 0 0 C I'nterson Summa Cycle Length: 14Q Actuated Cycle Length: 134 Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type; ,Actuated-Uncoordinaled Nlaximum, vac Rana: 0.97 Inteisectlan Signal delay; 45.0 Intersection LOS. Q Intention Capacity Utilizalion 98.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street )Laky Street 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection SUn-ima{y 2024 PU W Protected T; Route 111 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11:12.2021 --* t 10`` I'4layament EBS. EBT EER WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 T V t T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 202 1Q23 190 Future Volume {wehih) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Initial Qi (02b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Go 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1.a0 1.00 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,90 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1826 1855 1850 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 154 31 a 65 41 0 39 955 0 210 1{106 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 4.96 0,96 0,96 0. 6 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,96 0,96 Percent Meavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? P 3 £ C Gap,vehi11 183 173 95 75 241 120D 321 1261 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.09 C1.00 0.05 O,04 •0.110 0.03 0.55 UOQ Q.06 0.67 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1874 1585 Grp Valume(v . vehfh 154 31 G 65 4t 0 39 455 C, 210 1M, 0 Grp Sat F7cvv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1070 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serves -s), s 10.4 1_B 0.G 4.3 2.5 4.0 0.9 45.0 U-0 4.7 51.9 0,4 Cycle fD dear(g_c), s 10.4 1.6 H 4.3 2.6 0,0 0.9 45.0 0,0 4,7 51.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.0a 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.D0 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 183 173 95 75 241 1204 321 1281 VIC Ratio(X) 0.84 0,18 a.69 0.55 0.16 O.80 0,65 01.85 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 263 280 267 274 261 1200 402 1261 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.0{1 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,60 1.00 1.N 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slue: 52.5 50.3 0.0 55.9 565 0.0 17,0 15.4 0,0 19.3 14,8 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 15.2 0.5 0.4 8.4 6.0 0.0 0.3 5.5 4,4 2.6 7.1 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),siveh 0.a 0.0 0.0 0,0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfOftD(54°l9),vehrfln 5.3 0.9 0.0 2.2 1.3 0.0 D.5 19.4 0.0 3.S 22.3 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 68,0 50.8 0,0 54.3 62.5 0.0 17.3 21.0 0.0 22.0 21.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D E E B C C C Approat h Val, vett h 165 A 106 A 994 A 1276 A Approach Delay, s,veh 65.1 63.6 20.8 21.9 Approach LCIS E E C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.5 82.2 10.9 15.0 8.1 85.5 17.0 9.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 12.5 73.5 18.4 18.0 5.0 81.0 18.0 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 6.7 47.0 5.3 3.8 2.9 53,9 12.4 4.6 Green Ext Tome (p), s 0.3 8.8 0.1 071 0:0 10.8 0.2 0.1 Intersection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 2rd.3 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7irtl,b 2024 PM W Pr:rniissive (; ROLL te} I' & -�iko'Strr t 1Lako S`r et 1 12;2721 --*, ' *.-- t Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N13L NK.- NW 4181. :WT W Lane Configurations I 1� T4 + r + Traffic Volume (vph) 148 30 52 39 37 917 64 2D2 1823 190 Future Volume (vph) 148 3D fit 39 37 917 64 202 1423 190 Turn Type Porn NA Perm. NA pm+pt NA Perm pm4pt ISA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 5 6 Detector Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 & Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 +22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (5) 28,0 28.0 28,0 28.0 9.5 582 58.13 13.2 52.5 62.5 Total SPI it(%) 26.0% 28.D% 28.0% 28.0% 9.581 58.89 58.8% 13.2°l* 62.5% 62.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{3 7.o 1.0 I'D 1.0 1.8 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Nene None None Max PAax None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 23.5 73.5 23.5 23.5 59.3 54.3 54.3 177.13 61.8 61.8 Actuated grC Ratio 0.24 0.24 D.24 0.24 0.59 0.54 0.54 0.67 0,67 0.62 vie Rabo 1.03 8.19 0.21 0.53 8;25 0.95 8.08 0.94 0.93 8.19 Control Delay 123.1 15.6 311 15.3 9.9 42.3 3.2 72.0 33.6 2.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.4 0.0 OX Total aolay 123.1 15,6 33,4 15.3 9.9 42,3 3.2 72A 33.6 2.5 LOS F B C B A 10 A E C A App, cauh De!ay 86.0 18.7 38.7 34.9 Apprc,aah LOS F E 0 C Intersection Summa C�ole Lea qlh. 100 AcNa'keo Cycle Length; 100 Natural Cyde: 100 Control TyDe: ,Actuated-Uncoordinaled Maximum, vac Ratio: 1,03 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.3 Intersection LOS. Q Intersedon Capacity Ut➢iization 98.t'k ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases, 7. Route 11 & Laka Sr.reet )Laky Street 0 � 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection SUmmarn y 2024 PM W Permissive T; Route 111 & Lake Street /Lako Strect 11:12.2021 --* t 10`` I'4layament EBS. EBT EER WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 T V t T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 202 1Q23 190 Future Volume {vehih) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Initial Qi (02b), vets 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uo 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,90 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 Sat Rove, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 18555 1850 1870 1856 1870 1 M Adj Flour Rate,. vehlh 154 31 0 65 41 0 39 955 0 210 1{106 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 4.96 0,96 0,96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0.96 0,96 0,96 Percent Meavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 267 295 279 288 247 1158 329 1225 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.00 0,15 0.16 DAU 0.03 0.62 UC 0.07 -D.65 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1344 1870 0 1375 3326 0 1767 1855 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 154 31 G 65 41 D 39 955 0 210 1066 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1344 1870 0 1378 1826 0 1767 1858 1585 1767 1870 1585 0 Serves -s), s R9 1.3 0.G 3.8 1.7 0.0 0.7 35.3 010 3.7 40.5 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_c), s 11.5 1.3 U 5.0 17 0.0 0.7 35.3 0.0 3,7 40.5 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 Lam Grp Cap(c}, veWh 267 295 279 288 247 1158 329 1225 VJC Ratio(X) 0.58 0,11 0,23 0.14 0.16 0.92 0,64 0.87 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 412 496 428 485 1285 1158 387 1225 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.0{1 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 37:1 31.9 0.0 34.1 32.1 0.0 14,0 12.9 0,L' 15.9 12.3 0,0 her Delay (d2). siveh 2.0 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 6.7 0,0 2.7 8,Q U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir4lftD(54°l9),vehfln 3.3 0.6 0.0 1.3 0.8 0.0 D.3 14,7 0.0 2.5 18,8 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),slveh 39,1 32.1 0.0 34.5 32.4 0.0 14.3 19.6 0.0 18.6 20.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C C C B B B C Appfcat h Val, vett h 186 A 106 A 994 A 1276 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 37.9 33.7 19.4 20.5 Approach LCIS D C B C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 $ Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.3 59.8 18.5 7.6 82.5 18.3 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8,7 54.3 23,5 5.0 58.0 23:5 Max Q Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 5.7 37.3 13,0 2.7 42,5 7.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s Q,,2 7.2 0.4 0.0 8.01 0.8 tntefsection Summary HCC 5th. Ctrl Delay 21,E HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal culatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tln7ir(l,b 2024 PM W PFOtPertn (; Route: 1 & -�IkO Strr t �Lakc) S`r et 1 ;12;2721 ---W 'r Large Group EBL EBT WBL 'WBT NBL NBT NW 4181. :WT W Lane Configurations I 1 T4 '� + r �i + Traffic Volume (vph) 148 30 82 39 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Future Volume (vphj 148 30 62 39 37 917 64 202 1423 190 Turn Type PM+pt NA pm -pt NA pm+pl NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 B 2 2 5 6 Qetectof Phase 7 4 u a w 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Please Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 2.2,5 9.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (5) 10,9 216 9,8 2215 9,5 62,8 62.8 11a 67.1 67.1 Total SPI ft(%) 9.T,6 21.5% 8.9% 20.556 8.897u 57.1% 57.1% 12.5°1b 61.0% 61.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Nene None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 20.5 15.4 17.5 17.2 63.4 58.4 58.4 72.1 66.7 66.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0,20 0.15 0.17 0.12 0.61 0,56 0.56 0.69 0.64 0.64 vie Ratio 0.91 0.28 0.27 0.81 0.25 0.93 0.07 0.83 0.90 0.19 Control Delay 85.9 21.2 35.4 35.3 11X 38.2 1.0 72.9 30.3 3.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 Total Delay 55,9 21.2 35.4 35,3 11.0 38.2 1;0 72.9 30.3 3.4 LOS F C 13 D B D A E C A App, cauh Letay 63.6 353 34.8 32,7 Approach LOS E 0 C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:114 Actuated Cycle Length; 104.4 Natural Cyde: 110 Control Tyne; Actuated-Uncoordinaled Nlaximum 0c Rato-. 0.93 Inteisecllan Signal Delay. 36.0 Intersection LOS. Q Intention Capacity 110iizaton 98.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases, 77. Route 11 & Laka Street )Laky Street "13 t02 ��" 26 07 L,. 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intc--rsoction SUn-ima{y 2024 PM W ProtPe;rm T; Route 111 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11:12.2021 I'4layament EBS. EBT EBR WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Configurations 14 T V t T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 292 1Q23 190 Future Volume {vehih) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Initial Qi (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uo 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,90 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 18555 1850 1870 1856 1870 1 M Adj Flour Rate,. vehlh 154 31 0 65 41 0 39 955 0 210 1{106 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 4.96 0,96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,96 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? P 3 2 C Gap,vehl11 233 137 227 93 243 1166 325 1231 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.47 9.00 0.05 0.05 9.00 0.03 0.63 {r.OQ 0.06 0.66 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1526 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp Volume(v;.vehfh 154 31 G 65 41 D 39 955 0 210 1066 0 Grp Bat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 1858 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serves -s), s 6.4 1.5 0.0 3.3 2.1 0.0 0.7 31.5 0.0 3.9 410 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_c), s 6,4 1.5 0.0 3.3 2,1 0.0 0.7 37.5 0.0 3.9 43.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 233 137 227 93 243 1168 325 1231 VJC Ratio(X) 0.66 0.23 0.29 0.44 0.16 0.92 0,65 01.87 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 233 876 246 346 277 1166 386 1231 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.170 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.40 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 41.0 41.5 0-0 40.3 43.8 0.0 14.7 13.5 0,0 16.7 12.9 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 6.7 0.8 0.0 0.7 12 0.0 0.3 6.5 0,0 2.8 8.3 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehrfln 4.0 0.7 0.4 1.5 1.0 0.0 D.4 15.8 0.0 2.8 18.0 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 47.7 42.4 0.0 41.0 47.0 Ob 1.5.0 20.4 0.0 19.6 21.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D B B B C Appfcat h Val, veil h 186 A 106 A 994 A 1276 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 46.8 43.3 19.8 20.9 Approach LCIS D D B C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.6 64.3 8.8 11.5 7.7 67.1 10.9 9.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 9.3 58.3 5.3 19,1 5.0 62.6 6.4 18.t1 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 5.9 39.5 5.3 3.5 2.7 45,9 8,4 4.1 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.2 7.6 0.0 011 0.0 8.6 0.0 011 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 23.3 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7irtl,b 2024 PM VV 4 -Lane (; ROLL tc 1 & -�iko Strr t lL&ko S`r et 1 , IE:772I Large Group EBL EBT WBL VV T NBL IN HT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane CDnfiguratians I IP), '� T4 '� tt r tt Traffic Volume (vph) 148 30 52 39 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Future Volume (vph) 148 30 fit 39 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pt NA Perm pm4pt PSA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 a 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 32.6 32.6 12,4 35.5 35.5 Total SPI it(%) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 10.6% 36.2% 36.2% 13.8' 39A% 39.4% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 110 160 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 too Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Ncne None None Max. Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 12.0 g.5 9.5 33.4 28.4 28.4 40.0 35.5 35.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.12 9.12 0.44 0.37 0.37 0.53 0.47 0.47 vie Ratio Q56 0.26 0.30 0.69 0:16 0.73 0.10 0.72 0,64 0.23 Control Delay 38.6 16.6 34.2 15.8 12.8 .25.3 0.8 29.1 21.0 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17,0 0.0 6.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.5 16,6 34,2 10,8 12.5 26.3 0.8 29.1 21,0 3.9 LOS D B C B B C A C C A App, cauh Letay 31.0 20,1 24.2 15,8 Appreaah LOS C C C P Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length; 76 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type; ,Actuated-Unc�ofdinated Maximum ulc RaW-. 0.73 Inteisectlan Signal Delay; 22.2 Intersectlan LOIS: C IntersDdon Capacity Utilization 75,7°, ILLI Level of 5eNce D Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7, Route 11 u Laka Street )Laky Street 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection SUn-ima{y 2024 PM 1N 4 -Lane T; Route 111 & Lake Street /Lako Strect 11:12.2021 I'4layament EBS. EBT EER WBL W'BT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Configurations 14 T4 ft " + r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 D17 64 202 1Q23 190 Future Volume {wehih) 148 30 48 62 39 225 37 917 64 202 1023 190 Initial Qi (02b), veto 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.Go 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1.a0 1.00 1.00 1.0151 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,90 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na No No 04 $at Row,veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1850 1870 1856 1870 1$70 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 154 31 0 65 41 0 39 955 0 210 1{106 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 OX 4.96 0,96 0,96 0. 6 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,96 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? 2 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 207 221 118 121 328 1555 412 1755 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.00 0,07 0.07 0A0 0,04 0.44 U OC 0.09 0.0 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 3525 1585 1767 3554 1585 Grp Valume(v . vehfh 154 31 G 65 4t D 39 455 0 210 1066 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 1763 1585 1767 1777 1585 Ct Serve{s-s), s 5.4 0.9 0.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 0.7 13.2 0.0 3.9 13.8 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 5.4 0.9 0.0 2.3 1.4 0.0 0.7 13.2 0.0 3,9 13.8 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 6.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veft 207 221 118 121 328 1555 412 1755 VJC Ratio(X) 0.74 0.14 0,55 0.34 0.12 0.61 0,51 061 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 495 828 503 516 397 1555 468 1755: 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,0{1 1.00 1.00 1.110 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued .27.2 25.2 0.0 28.8 23.4 0.0 9.7 13.7 0,0 9.9 11,7 0.0 her Delay (d2), siveh 5.3 0.3 0.4 19 1 A 0.0 0.2 1.8 0,0 1.0 1.6 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.4 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirClftn(54°l9),vehfln 2.4 DA 0.0 1.0 0_6 0.0 0.3 5.0 4.0 1.3 5.0 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 32.4 25.5 0.0 32.7 30.0 0.0 9,9 15.5 0.0 10.8 13.2 0.0 LnGrp L05 C C C C .4 B B B Apprcat h Val, veil h 186 A 106 A 444 A 1276 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 31.3 31.7 15.3 12.8 Approach LCIS D C B B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 32.6 12.0 7.0 36.0 8.7 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s T9 28.1 1H 5.0 31.0 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 5.9 15.2 7,4 2.7 15.8 4.3 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,1 5.5 0.4 0.0 6.8 0.3 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 15.9 HChA 6th LOS 0 N otes Unsignaiized De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service; NB Rorlte 11 2024 AM W Segment LOS 11112.202'1 Arterial Flow Running Signal Travel Dist. Arterial Arterial Cross Street Class S e Time Delpy Times mi Seed LOS Lako StreeL III 3Q 63,2 73.7 135.9 0,53 13.9 E Puripii -�nui 1 III 3G 1177.5 20,5 120.0 0,90 25.2 B Total III 170,7 94.2 264.9 1,42 19.3 C Arterial Level of Service: SB Rotate 11 Arterial Floe Running Signal Tavel Dist Arterial Arterial Gross Sircet Glass Spud Time Delsy Time (5� (m0, :Speed LOS Puapu;3anui S1 III 3G 94.3 18.4 112.7 179 25.1 B Lako Street III 3G 107,5 34.4 141,E 0,90 22.7 C Total 5.00 pm Baseline 201.8 52.8 254.6 1.68 23.8 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service; NB Rorlte 11 2024 PM W Segment LOS 10.25-2021 Arterial Flow RiAnaing Signal Travel Dist Arlerlai Arterial Cro" Skeet Gass SD i Tire N14 Time {a1 (mi) Spero Los Lako Streek III 3Q 63,2 47.0 110-2 153 17.2 D Purrpuaanui 41 III 3G 1177.5 1?.6 126.1 q,z () 25.6 B Total 111 170,7 G;r,6 236.3 1,42 21.7 C Arterial Level of Service: SB Rotate 11 Arterial Floe Running Signal Travel [list Arterial Arterial Gross Sircet Glass speLd TI me Delay Time {sr {mrd, Speed I_+;' Puapu;3anui S1 III 3G 94,2 3216 126,8 179 22.3 C I..akn Street III 3G 107.5 38.5 146.0 0,90 22.1 C Total 201.7 71.1 272.8 1.68 22.2 C Synchro 10 Report Paqe 1 Appendix F Analysis Reports — Future Without Project Conditions (2029) Tiniir-gs 202 AM "10 1: Falaili Rd & RoLlte 11 1 �c 12:7321 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M tt r M tlt r 1) ++ ' tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 71 537 21B 1154 790 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Future Volume (vph; 7't 537 718 164 790 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Turn Type 'rot NA Perm. Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 5 Detectad Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# (s) 9,5 36.5 38,5 0.5 38,5 38.5 9.5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 10.7 38.5 38.5 15.0 42.8 42,5 15.8 51.4 51,4 10.1 423 42,7 Total SPI ft(%) 9.3% 33.5% 33.5% 13.0"k 37.2% 372% 16.3% 44.7% 44.7% 8.8% 37.1% 37.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Norge Max Max Nave Ncne None None Nave None Act Eftct Green (s) 6.2 35.2 35.2 9.3 40.7 40.7 11.6 29.7 29.7 5.7 17.1 17.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.07 0.36 0.38 0.10 0.44 0.44 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.19 6.19 vie Ratio 0.34 0.43 0.37 0.49 0.53 0.04 0.58 4.17 0.20 0.19 9.50 0.41 Control Delay 49.2 24.4 5,1 46.3 23.1 0.1 45.2 22.8 5.3 50.3 35.3 7.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,1` 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.2 24.4 5.1 ;5.3 23.1 4.1 45,2 22.$ 5,3 50.3 353 73 LOS D C A D C A 0 C A D D A Appicauh Letay 21.5 26A 29,0 28.5 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summa C+yCle Lenglth:115 Actuated Cycle Length:; 91,5 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe, Semi A-A-1lncoord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0_58 Intersection Signal D] lay: 25.4 Intersec#lan LOIS: C Intersection Capacity U61izatiori 63.3 6 ICU Level of 5eNce B Analysis Period [min) 15 Raute 11 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Inttorsection Sun-tma{y 2029 AM WO 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 ardent EBL EBT EBR 'WBL dlBT VJBR NQL NOT MR SEL f $,OR Lane Configurations M tt r )I t� 1) ++ r Traffic Volume (veWh) 71 air 218 1644 790 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Future Volume ;wehth) 71 537 218 164 7'90 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Initial Q (0b), vett 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0a 1.00 120 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1737 1767 1737 1841 1x11 1841 1841 1870 1856 1670 1870 1M Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 72 548 G 167 806 0 248 1% 0 21 328 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.96 0,98 0,08 0.98 198 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,98 13.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Gap, vehlh 161 1538 250 1657 344 777 42 500 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.46 {1.00 0.07 0,48 •0.00 0.10 0.22 UQ 0.02 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1560 3401 3554 1572 1751 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vef fh 72 548 G 167 806 0 246 19E 0 21 328 0 Grp Sat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1605 1678 1172 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1555 0 Serves -s), s 17 8.4 0 0 3.8 12.0 0.0 a.6 3.6 0.0 0.9 o -D 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 1.7 8.4 0.0 3.8 12.6 0.0 5.6 3.6 4.0 0.9 6.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vert 161 1538 250 1657 344 777 42 500 VJC Ratio(X) 0.45 0.35 0.67 0.49 0.72 0.25 0.51 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 250 1538 449 1657 612 2096 125 1707 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.110 1.Q0 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 O.DO 1.00 1.00 13.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 36.7 14.0 0.0 35.9 13.9 0.0 34.6 25.7 0.0 38.4 321 0,0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 2.0 0.6 0.4 3.1 1.0 0.0 2.9 0.2 0,0 9.2 1.5 U In!r at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 .0.0 0.4 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacirf0ftn(54°l9),vehfln 0.7 3.0 0.0 1.6 4.6 0.4 2,4 1.5 4.0 0.5 3.0 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),siveh 38,7 14.6 0.0 38.9 15.4 0.0 37.5 25.9 0.0 47.5 33.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Appfoauh Vol, veli h 620 A 973 A 444 A 349 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 17.4 10.1 32.4 34.6 Approach LOS B B C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 21.9 10.4 401.9 12.5 15.7 8.5 42.8 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.6 46.9 10.5 34.0 14.3 38.2 8.2 311.3 Max Q Clear Time (9_o+11), s 2.9 5,0 5,8 10,4 7.6 8.9 3.7 14.6 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.3 0.2 3.7 0.5 2.2 0.0 5.8 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 23.4 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2029 AM WO 2: Henry St & Routo 11 1V12.202'I -' 9 t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M tt r +t 0 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 10T 438 124 57 715 507 146 337 47 403 339 Future Vol urne (vph) 107 438 124 57 715 507 146 337 47 403 339 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prot 1+fA Porro Split NA Psrm Split NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 Qetectof Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 n Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 0.5 30.5 30 9.5 30.5 30.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35,5 Total Split (s) 10.0 33.1) 33.G 10.0 a3,0 33,0 36.5 36.5 36,5 35.5 35,5 Total SPI €t(%) 8.7% 28.7% 28.7% 8.710 28.7% 26.7% 31.7% 31.7% 31.7% 30.9% 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{3 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 Tatar Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 LeadLag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None None Name Act Effct Green (s) 5.6 31A 31.4 16 29.0 29.0 17.7 17.7 17.7 24.2 24.2 Actuated grO Ratio O.OG 0.33 D.33 0.06 0.31 0.31 0.19 0,19 0.19 0.26 0.26 vie Ratio 0.60 0.42 0.22 0,30 0,71 0.63 6.47 0.53 0.13 0.73 .0.71 Control Delay 61.6 29.6 6.9 51.5 35.9 6.8 40,3 39.3 0.8 44.7 36.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.D 4.0 0.4 0.0 Total Delay 61.5 29.6 6.9 51.5 35.9 6.8 40,3 39.3 0,8 44.7 36.2 LOS E C A D D A D D A D a App, cauh Lotay 30.5 25.11 36.2 30.1 Approa5h LOS C 0 1} 11 Intersection Summa Cycle Length:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 94.8 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control TyDe: Semi A,c#-Oncoord Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.73 Intersecllon Signal Delay; 31.5 Intersectlan LOIS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 69.6 ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Split}s and Phases: 2: HenrySt & RaIUW 11 1177 05 5.00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lnte' section Capacity Analysts 2029 AM WO 2. Henry St & Route 11 11;12.202`1 I'41oamerrt EBL EBT EBR 'WOL WBT WBR fNBL NBT IBR SBL SBT SBFT Lane Configurations M tt r �1 tt 1 4+ r 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 10T 438 124 57 715 507 146 337 47 403 339 124 Future Volume (vph) 107 438 124 57 715 507 146 337 47 403 339 124 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 1900 19M 1900 19M 3900 19N 1900 190€1 19M 1900 Total Lost lime (s) 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane 4ttil, Factcar 0,97 0.95 1.1}0 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.91 9.81 1.00 0.91 0,91 Frpb, ped;bikes 1,00 1.00 D.99 1,00 1,00 0,99 1,44 1.Oti 0,99 1.00 1,00 Flpb, pe ikes 1.00 1.00 1,00 1100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Frt IM 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 0,97 Flt Proleccled 0,95 1,00 1. DO 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 IZ 1.GG 0.95 0,9s Said, Flaw (p;otf 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1467 1595 3175 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Setd. Flow (perrr) 3099 3282 1510 3303 3406 1549 1.564 3348 1487 t595 3175 Peat[ -hour factor, Pict= 0.97 11.97 17.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0_97 0.97 197 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 110 452 128 59 737 523 151 347 48 415 349 128 RTOR Reductkx� NN 0 0 86 0 0 358 0 0 39 0 21 0 Lane Group Flow Nphl 110 452 42 59 737 185 136 362 9 299 572 0 Gonfl, Peds. (Nhr} 2 2 4 3 3 4 Confl. Bikes (R+hr) 1 Heavy Vehicles "°'4 4 - 13% 1ali5 5% 6% 6% 3'1fa 51A3% 7% 3% 4% 51!0 Turn Type Prot INA Perm Prot NA Peer 5 fA t pi. NA Perm Slit p NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 n Pgrmitled Phases 4 a 2 Actuated Green. G(s) 5,6 31,4 31.4 4.3 30.1 30.1 17,+ 17.7 17.7 24.2 24.2 Effective Green, g (s) 5.6 3t.4 31.4 4,3 30.1 30.1 17.7 17.7 17.7 24.2 24..2 Actuated g C natio 0.06 9.33 0.33 0,04 0,31 0.31 0-19 0,19 0,19 0,25 0025 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 41.5 V'ehde Extension fs} 10 3.0 10 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 181 1077 497 148 1072 497 289 619 275 403 803 v+s Ratio Prot c0.04 0.14 0.02 c0.22 0.09 u0.11 c0.19 0.18 Vs Ratio Perm 0.2 0.11 0.01 v.+c Ratio 0.61 OA2 ME 0,40 0,69 0.34 0,47 0.58 0,03 0.74 0.71 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 43,9 25.0 22.2 44.4 28.6 25.1 34.8 35.6 31,9 32.8 32.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.40 1.H 1. GO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Inc'emental Delay, d2 51 1_2 0.3 1.8 3.6 1-9 1.2 1.4 O,C 7.2 M Delay (s) 49,13 26.2 215 4&2 32.2 27,0 36,0 37.0 32,0 40,0 35.5 Le'v'el of Service p C C D C C D €7 C 0 D Appfua; th Delay `s1 29.2 30,8 36.3 37.0 Approach LA'S C C L' D tntersection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 33.4 HCM 7600 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.67 Actuated C be Length (s-) 95,6 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 Intersection Capacity Oliaation, 69.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period train) 15 c Critical Lane Croup 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2C29 AM WO I Rat_1tO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2721 Intersection Int DelFy. siveh 20 Movement EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Gontagurations $1027.1 a r B t f 1 Traffic Vol, vehrh 44 54 156 1185 944 30 Future Vol, vehlh 44 54 156 1185 944 30 CeniticOng Peds, Or 0 a a 0 1 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channeiazed - Free - Mane - YAd Storage Length 140 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Starager # ti - - 0 4 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor g3 93 93 93 93 93 HeavyVeh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 MAvint Flow 47 58 168 12Y4 1015 32 Maicrf# Oa Mincr2 MOM Maim Conflicting Flovu AJI 2626 1016 0 - 0 Stag; 1 1016 - - - Stage 2 1610 - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 4.12 - Critical t4dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Maneuver -26 a m3 Stage 1 3B0 0 - - Slage 2 180 a Platoon blocied, % - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver -20 - 682 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar - 20 - - Stage 1 2,4 Stage 2 18' _ . . Approach EEL N6 so HGM Control Delay, $1027.1 1.4 a HCM LOS F Mhor Uriie major MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBW 'SBT SBR Capacity (vehh) 682 - 20 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 1246 - 2.366 - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 12 $1027.1 a HGNI Lane LDS B - F it - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 1 - 6.3 Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity $; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Ara] major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseaine Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2C29 AM WO 4: ROLItE3 11 & I lUalalai Rd (South � 1 c12.2n21 Inlerseclion Infe.Ny s.veh 1.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonfgurations 0 13.1 - r T it B - HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1 Traffic Vol, v&Vh 9 14€1 12N 15 73 919 Future Vol, vehlh 9 140 1200 15 73 919 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Yield - None Storage Langlh fl 0 Veh in Mediae Storage, # 0 - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 Peale Hour Faclor k 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 a 5 PAvint Flow 10 151 1290 15 78 988 Majormkw Midori Majorl MajW Conflicting Fluwv AJI 2442 0 0 1290 0 Stage 1 1 2W Stage 2 1144 - - - - Crltical Hdwy 662 - - 4.16 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ _ _ 2.254 Poo CW1 Maneuver 36 0 - - 524 - Stage 1 2.56 0 - - Stage 2 9041 0 _ _ - _ Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 30 - - - 524 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuvar 30 - - Slage 1 256 Slage 2 259 Approach m NO HGM Control Delay, s 174.2 0 1 HCM LOS F mhor LarWmaior M4vmt Nf NBRWBUIIWBLn2 SK SBT Capacity (vehh) - - 30 - 524 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - 0.323 - 0.15 - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 174.2 0 13.1 - HCtwf Lane LDS - - F it B - HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1 - 15 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Tin7ir4l,b 202 AM "10 b: ROLL to 1 i & Puaptlaanui t 1 12:7721 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane CDnfiguratians t r I t t + r Traffic Volume (vph) 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 S6 24 43 a18 68 Future Volume (vph) 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 886 24 43 818 fib Turn Type Perm NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+p# NA Perm prn+pt NA Penn Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 a 8 2 2 6 5 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 a a 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 22,5 22.5 9,5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 23.0 23.0 210 23.0 23.0 23.0 9.6 57,q 57,5 9.5 57.4 57.4 Total SPI rt(%) 255.6% 25.6% 25.6% 25.6% 25.6% 25.6% 10.7% 63.91% 163.9% 10.6% 63.8% 63.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{3 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse None None None None Nore Max Max None Max Max Aat Eflut Green (8) 16.6 16.6 16,6 1U 16.6 16.6 55.2 55.3 55.3 57.2 53.4 53.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.19 0.19 a.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.67 0.64 0.64 0.66 0.62 6.62 vie Ratio 0.82 0.03 a22 044 0.16 0.35 0.38 0.80 0.03 0.15 (178 0.07 Control Delay 60.6 29.4 9.0 37.0 31.1 S.0 8.4 20.2 0.0 6.0 20.0 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 07 0 6.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.6 0;0 o.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60,5 28.0 9,0 37.0 31.1 8.0 8.4 20.2 0,0 C.0 20,0 2.3 LOS E C A C C A A C A A B A App, cauh Letay 45,5 22.8 18,5 18,0 Approach LOS 1) 0 S S Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 86.4 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: 0.82 Inteiseclian Signal delay; 21.9 Intersectlan LOS: C Intemdon Capacity Utilization 79,4% ICI Level of SeNcc D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases:5: Route 11 & Puapusanui St } 01 1 X 2 -004 05 � 06 03 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2029 AM WCC 5; Route 11 & Puapuaanui St 11!12.202'I ---w , .- *� I'4layament EBS. EBT EBR VVBL VVFBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t r I t V t T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 8801 24 43 818 68 Future Volume ;vehih) 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 886 24 43 818 68 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0U 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 1$70 1870 1870 1856 1870 1670 1826 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 310 10 0 117 64 0 113 943 0 46 870 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.02 0.94 0,92 0,94 0.92 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,94 0,92 Percent Heavy Veh, °!c2 2 2 3 2 2 2 ? 3 2 5 2 Gap,vehl11 316 382 361 382 215 1126 267 1081 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0,20 0.00 0.05 0.61 UOQ 0.04 D.69 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1338 1870 1595 1405 3870 1585 1751 1856 1555 1781 1826 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 210 10 G 117 54 0 113 943 0 46 870 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1338 1870 1585 1405 1870 1555 1781 1856 1585 1781 1826 1555 0 Serve{s_s), s 13.7 0.4 Q.G 6.5 2.5 0.0 2.2 36.3 U-0 0.9 33.2 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 16.2 0.4 0.0 8.9 2.5 0.0 2.2 36.3 O,0 0.9 33.2 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.DG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh h 316 382 361 38.2 315 1126 267 1081 VJC Ratio(X) 0.66 0.43 0.32 0 1 0.36 0.84 0.17 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 320 387 365 387 323 1126 299 1081 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.44 1.00 1,G0 1,00 1.00 1.110 1.Q0 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.40 1.40 0.0°0 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 0.00 1.04 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), elven 36.0 28.4 0.0 31.2 29.3 0.0 13.5 14.1 O.0 13.7 14.2 0.0 her Delay (d2). siveh 5.0 0.0 0.4 4.5 0.2 0.0 0.7 7.5 0,0 0.3 6.4 U In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0L 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.8 0.2 0.0 2.2 1.1 0.4 0.9 15.5 0.41 0.4 14.0 i}.0 Un -gig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 41.0 28.5 0.0 31.7 29.8 0.0 14.2 21,0 0.0 14.0 20.6 0.0 LnGrp L05 D C C C S C B C Apprcauh Vol, veli h 220 A 181 A 1056 A 916 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 40.4 310.9 20.3 Approach LOS D C C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 58.7 22.7 9.2 .57.4 22.7° Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.0 53.0 18.5 5.1 52.9 185, Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.9 38.3 18.2 4.2 35.2 8.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,0 6.5 0,0 0,0 6.4 0.4 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 23,2 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2C29 AM WO 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakim Stroot 1 c12.2021 Intersection ht ;elsY s.veh 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions Mincf2 r Conflicting Flovu AJI t t Stage 1 Traffic Vol, v&Vh 0 159 602 943 945 B Future Vol, vehlh 0 159 602 943 945 0 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - None - YWd Storage Lcnglh 164 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 4 2 5 5 7 MAvint Flow 0 171 547 1014 1016 0 Majo!-Ura Mincf2 Majorl Mejo'l Conflicting Flovu AJI 3324 1016 0 - 0 Stage 1 1016 . - - _ Stage 2 23(8 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42 4.12 - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Maneuver S 0 683 Stage 1 3B( 0 - - Slage 2 84 0 Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 683 - - - tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar 0 - Stage 1 19 Stage 2 9 . . Approach m NO SB HGM Control Delay, s 0 18.5 G HCM LOS A mhor UrWmajor MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 683 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,948 - - - - MGM Control Delay (s) 47A - 0 A HGNI Lane LDS € - A A - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) 13.5 - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tinilr-gs 2029 AM "10 (; RoUte 1 & -�IkO Strt-'e:t 1 ,12:7721 --p- ' *.-- t ! Large Group EBIL EBT W8L 'WBT NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians I 1� 1i T4 ' f r t Traffic Volume (vph) 278 48 59 36 33 951 55 150 504 142 Future Volume (vph) 278 48 fig 36 33 961 55 188 804 142 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Ferm Protected Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) .22.5 22,5 22.5 225 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 28.2 28.2 24.6 24.6 9.5 82.6 82.6 14.6 67,7 67.7 Total SPI it(%) 18.8'1/o 18.8% 16.4% 16.4% 6.3% 55.1`}6 85.1% 9.7% 58.5% 58.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 I.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost '1 irt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 23.7 .23.7 20.1 20.1 83.1 78.1 78.1 92.7 95.1 85.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.13 0,13 0.55 0.52 0.52 0.62 0.57 0,57 vie Rasa 1,06 0.41 0.31 1,08 0;19 1.05 0.07 1.05 0.82 0.16 Control Delay 128.3 42.2 62,8 107.5 13.9 79.2 0.2 121.7 34.7 5.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 4.4 6.0 0.0 0.0 f1.0 a.0 0.0 L1,0 Total Delay 129.3 42.2 62.8 197,8 13.9 79.2 U�2 121.7 3437 5.8 LOS F to E F E E A F C A App, cauh Deiay 103.6 104,1 72.9 43.6 Approeah LOS F F E 0 Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuale�! Cyde Length. 160 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum 0c Ratio:1.08 Inteisectlarl Signal Delay: 69,7 Intersectlon LOS E Inter tion Capacity tJolizatiorb 110,1% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Sr.met } 31 1X32 4 FSB 0:, s 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Pagh 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2029 AM WO T Route 11 & Lako Street 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T Vi t r + Traffic Volume (vehfh) 278 48 59 59 36 296 33 951 55 160 804 142 Future Volume ;vehih) 278 46 69 69 36 296 33 96t 55 160 844 142 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 U 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.OD 1.00 1.00 1_CI0 1,00 1.00 1,O0 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,40 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 1870 1870 1870 1070 1449 1811 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 296 51 0 73 38 0 35 1422 0 170 855 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 8.94 0.94 0,94 0!94 0,94 D.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap, vehlh 309 325 102 108 279 1073 194 1131 Arrive On Green 9.17 0.17 0.00 0.06 CaOC 0.110 0.43 0.57 U OC 0.0-3 0.51 O.C!0 Sat Flow, veh h 17B1 1870 0 1767 3870 0 1781 1870 15610 1725 1858 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 296 51 G 73 38 0 35 1022 0 171 855 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 22.5 3.2 D.G 5.5 2.7 4.0 1.1 70.1 OR 6.5 45.5 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 22,5 3.2 0.0 5.5 2,7 0.0 1.1 717.1 4.0 6.5 45.5 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 1-40 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veW h 3+09 325 142 108 279 1073 194 1131 VJC Ratio(X) 0.96 0,16 0.72 0.35 0.13 0.95 0.88 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 309 325 260 276 .296 1073 213 1131 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.D4 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.O0 11.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 55.9 47.9 0.0 63.2 61.8 0.0 17.5 27.3 0,0 36.8 19.3 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 39,5 0.2 0.0 s,0 1.9 0.0 D.2 18.2 0.0 29.9 4.7 0.0 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 17.11 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(S0°l9),vehfln 13.5 1.S 0.0 2.S 1.3 0.0 D.5 35.3 0.0 7.4 20.4 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 95,4 48.1 0.0 72.7 63.8 0.0 17.7 45.5 0.0 66.7 24.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D E E B ID E C Apprcauh Vol, vett h 347 A 111 A 1057 A 1025 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 88.1 69.3 44.6 31.1 Approach LOS F E D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 18.1 82.8 28.2 8.2 87,.7 12.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 405 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 101.1 78.1 W 5.0 83.2 20.1 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 8.5 72.1 24.5 11 47.5 7.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 3.7 U 0.0 9.0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 40.2 HChA 6th LOS D N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- arse;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Tin7ir�l 202 AM WO S. ROLL tc 1 i & r>Iii;+>I r1l 11c1 III Fuad 1 i : 12,2 021 Analysis Period (min) 15 Sulits and Phases: 8: Route 11 & Kamehameha ill Read at 0&3 -1111. --r tod t I Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NBT SSL SST Lane Configuratians 4 r Traffic Volume (vph) 5 26 12 76 568 16 513 Future Volume (vph) 5 26 12 Ifs 588 16 513 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot NA Prat ISA Protecled Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 Qetectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30,0 30.0 3Q0 9.5 23.0 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.4 30.4 30.0 13.8 45.0 9.6 40.8 Total SPI rt(%) 26.4% 26.4"f3 26.10 12.0°x, 39.1° 6.3% 35.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{t 110 1.0 1.0 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yas 'des Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Nene Norge Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 1510 15.0 7.3 8,6 47.3 5.2 40.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.11 0.58 O.G6 0.49 vie Raba OZ3 0.08 0.29 0.48 H3 0.15 0.55 Control Delay 41.4 0.5 31.8 47.7 19.9 44.5 17.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 Do 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total flay 41.4 4.5 31.6 47.7 18.9 44,5 17.2 LOS D A C 0 ® L) B App, cauh Delay 36.3 31.B 23.0 17.7 Apprc,ach LOS D C 0 13 Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length; 81,8 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Rano: 0.63 Inteiseclion Signal Delay; 22.3 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion Nmdty Utilizaton 64.1° ILLI Level of SeNce C Analysis Period (min) 15 Sulits and Phases: 8: Route 11 & Kamehameha ill Read at 0&3 'R04 tod 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Reporl Page 16 FIC;Pr1 6:17 Sir;rtalizod Ir-tti,,rsuctiuri Surilni&,-y 2,J29 AM VV0 8; ROUte 1 III Rued 1 12:7721 I'4layament EBL EBI EBR WBIL UVBT WBR NBL NBT IBR SBL SBT SOR Lane Configurations 4 r t-� 1 +T Traffic Volume (vehfh) 179 5 26 16 12 17 76 555 15 16 51a 320 Future Volume ;vehih) 179 5 25 16 12 17 76 585 15 16 513 320 Initial Q (02b), vets 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.04 0.95 1-40 0,85 1.40 1,00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.40 1.010 1.a0 1,00 1.44 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1811 1870 1722. 1874 1781 17D6 1752 1011 1870 1870 1811 1811 Adj Row Rate,. vehlh 192 5 D 17 13 1a 82 632 16 17 552 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.K 0.93 0,93 0,93 0.93 f0.93 0,93 0.93 0,83 D.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 2 12 2 8 7 10 6 2 2 6 fi Cep, vehlh 252 7 24 18 26 103 964 24 36 1743 Arrive On Gruen 0.15 0.15 (1.00 0,04 0.f)4 9.44 10,06 0.55 a.55 0.02 0,51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1738 45 1459 569 435 603 1665 1757 44 1781 3532 0 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 197 0 D 48 0 D 82 0 648 17 552 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1783 0 1459 1608 0 0 1665 0 1802 1781 1721 0 Q Serve{s_s), s 7.8 4.9 0.0 2.2 0.4 4.0 3.6 0.0 18.7 0.7 7.4 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_c), 5 7,8 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 18.7 0.7 7.4 0.01 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.00 0.35 0.37 1.00 0.02 1.00 0 -CIO L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 259 0 68 0 0 103 a 989 36 1743 VJC Ratio(X) 0.76 0.1)0 0.70 0.06 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.66 0,48 0.32 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 625 0 555 0 0 210 D 939 123 174a HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.0{1 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 01.00 0.00 1.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.100 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 30.3 0.0 0.0 349 0.0 0-0 341 0.0 11,7 35.6 10,7 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 4.6 0.0 0.4 12.4 0.0 0.0 12.6 b.0 3.4 9.7 0.5 0.0 In!t al 0 Delay(Q) siveh 10.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirO}ftD(54°l9),vehfln 3.6 DA 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 6.7 0.4 2.3 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 34.9 0.0 0.0 47.3 0.0 01.0 46.8 0.4 15.1 45.4 11.2 0. LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Appfcauh Vol, veb!h 197 A 48 730 56"4 A Approach Delay, s.,veh :34.9 47.3 1u.7 12.2 Approach LOS C D F E0 Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 5 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.2 9.1 41.9 7.6 6.0 45.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 25.9 9.3 36.3 25.5 5.1 40.6 Max Q Cleat Time (g_c+i1), s 9.8 5.6 9.0 4.2 2.7 210.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.9 0.0 3.5 0.2, 0.0 3.9 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 19.a HCl`A 6th LOS 0 N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 Tin7ir(lS 2029 PM "10 1: Falaili Rd & RULI`r; 11 1 �c 12:7721 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL 'vVBT WBR NOL. NK NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians Traffic Volume (vph) X0 1025 503 2226 715 56 227 283 263 54 313 107 Future Volume (vph) 2,60 1025 563 226 715 56 227 283 263 54 313 107 Turn Type Prat NA Peru Rot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 5 Qetectc,r Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9,5 38.5 38.5 9.5 35,5 38.5 9.5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 16.3 42.0 42.0 14,0 39.7 39.7 14,0 45.4 45.4 13.6 45,0 45.0 Total SPI it(%) 14.2% 36.5% 36.5% 12.2% 34.5% 34.5% 12.2% 39.5°/n 39.5% 11.8% 39.1% 39.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None None Name None Act Eflut Green (s) 11.2 a7.9 37.9 9.5 36.2 36.2 9.5 2a.7 20.7 7.8 16.8 16.8 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 4.41 0.41 0,10 0,39 039 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.08 0.18 6.18 vie Raba 0.64 0.72 0.58 0.65 0:53 0.08 4.66 0.36 0,48 0.37 0.49 0.29 Control Delay 47.S 27.9 8.6 51.0 24.9 1.4 51.4 31.7 6.6 45.7 35.4 7.7 Queue Delay 0.6 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.4 D.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 Total Delay 47.5 27,9 8,6 51,0 24.9 1.4 51,4 31,7 6.6 45.7 35.4 73 LOS ♦D C A D C A 0 C A D 0 A App, cauh Letay 25.4 29.5 29,0 30.8 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglth:115 Actuated Cycle Length, 91,9 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Ty:ae: Semi Act-Unroord Nlaximum u c Rato: 4.72 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay. 27.7 Intersectlan LOIS: C Inter eon Capaci#y Utilization 66 e% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 1: Pala7i, Rd 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Ir,ttorsection SUn-trna{y 2029 PM WO 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 I'4layarnerrt EBL EBT EBR WBL dlBT VJBR NBL NET NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Configurations �1 tt r tt V ft ' tt r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 20 1025 503 226 715 566, 227 283 263 54 313 107 Future Volume ;wehlh) 260 1025 503 226 715 66 227 283 263 54 313 107 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.44 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 1855 1856 1370 1870 1641 1870 1855 1570 1870 1870 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 265 1046 0 231 730 0 232 283 0 55 319 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.05 0,98 0,98 0,95 0.98 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,38 13.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 P 2 f 2 Cap, vehlh 353 16066 314 1551 314 684 77 509 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.46 {1.00 0.09 0,44 9.00 U9 0.19 UQ Q.04 0.14 0.00 Sat Flotia,vehh 3428 35266 1585 3456 3497 1585 3428 3554 1555 1751 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 265 1046 0 231 730 0 232 289 0 55 319 0 Grp Bat F10w(s),veh!hiln 1714 17663 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 1777 1555 0 Serves -s), s 13.2 18.9 0.G 5.4 12.1 0.0 5.4 5.9 0.0 2.5 7,0 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 6,2 18.9 0,0 5,4 121 0.0 5.4 5.13 4.0 2.5 7.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 353 166066 314 1551 814 680 77 509 VJC Ratio(X) 0.75 0.65 0,74+ 0.47 0.74 0.42 0,71 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 491 16606 399 1551 396 1758 197 1748 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1,00 1.00 1,x 1,00 1.170 1.110 1.Q0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.411 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.0 1.40 0.04 1.00 1.04 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 75.9 17.3 0.0 36.5 16.1 0.0 36.4 29.3 U 38.9 33.2 0,0 Mor Delay (d2). siveh 4.1 2.1 0.0 5.2 1.0 0.0 5.4 0.4 0,0 11.3 1.8 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Back=(541/9),vehlln 27 7,4 0.4 2,A 4-7 0.4 2.5 2.5 0.0 1.3 3.0 0:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),slveh 40.0 19.4 0.0 41.6 17.1 0.0 41.8 29.7 0.0 50.2 34.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Apprcauh Vol, veb!h 1311 A 961 A 521 A 374 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 23.6 23.0 35.1 36.8 Approach LOS C C D L Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 A 7 $ Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.1 20.3 12.0 42.0 12.0 16.3 13.0 41.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 9.1 40.9 9.5 37.5 9.5 40.5 11.8 35.2 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 4,5 7.9 7.4 20.9 7.4 9.0 8.2 14.1 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 2.0 0.2 66.8 0.2 2.2 0.3 4.9 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 26.0 HChA 6th LOS C; N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2029 PM WO 2: Henry St & Routo 11 11112.2021 -',, t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WI3L VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL SK Lane Configuratians �1 tt P tlt 1 4+ 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 807 291 80 665 348 126 318 38 388 342 Future Volume (vph) 190 807 291 80 665 318 126 318 38 388 342 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prot NA Pom Split NA Perm $OR NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2. Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 a a 2 2 2 & 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 0.5 30.5 30,5 9.5 30.5 30,5 35.5 35.5 35,5 35.5 35,5 Total Split (s) 13,0 34.0 34.0 a s 30,5 30,5 36.0 36.0 35,0 35.5 35,5 Total SPI it(%) 11.3% 29.6% 29,6% 8.3% 26.5% 26.59 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 30.9% 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3,5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne Nave None None Aot Eftct Green (s) 8.5 32.2 32.2 6.1 26.4 26.4 17.0 I7.0 1700 25.1 25.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0,09 0.34 D.34 0.05 0,28 0,28 0.18 0,18 0.18 0.26 0.26 vie Ratio 0.65 4.59 0.41 0.45 0.71 0.52 0.41 0.56 0.11 0.75 0.71 Control Delay 55.T 34.7 6,6 56.0 37.9 6,7 39,7 39.7 G.6 45.1 34.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,D 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 01D 0.0 0,0 OX Total aolay 55,7 34.2 5.5 X6,0 37,9 6,7 39,7 39.7 9,6 45-1 34.1 LOS E C A E D A D D A D C Apprcauh De!ay .30.9 29.3 36.8 37.8 Approach LOS C C i} 10 Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 95.3 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Ra#o: 0.75 Inteiseclion Signal Delay: 32,9 Intersec#lan LOS: C Intersection Capaci#y Utilization 73,4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: HenrySt & RaIUW 11 t ' &h5 f 013 NOW E�7 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lntesection Capacity Analysis 2029 PM WO 2. Henry St & Route 11 11112-2021 --I' ---P, t41 Moamerrt EBL EBT EBR WOL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL ABT SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt r )) tt 4+ 04 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 807 299 80 665 348 126 318 38 388 342. 190 Future Volume (vph) 190 807 291 80 665 348 126 318 38 388 342 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 1904 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 9800 1900 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lana Ubl. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.90 Q.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped -bikes 1.00 1.00 1,04 1.00 1,09 0.99 1.44 1.90 0,98 1.00 -199 Flpb, pedfbikes 1 #30 1.00 1,04 1100 1100 1.00 1.00 1.04 1'W 1,00 1.0 Frt I M 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.35 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 4.9.5 1,00 UO 4.95 1.44 1,00 0.95 1,00 UQ 0.95 0,99 Saud, Flaw (protf 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1510 3195 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.04 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Setd, Flow (Derrl1f 3.335 3539 15$3 3433 3471 1561 1.595 3382 1537 1917 3195 Peal[ -hour IaCtor, U'H'F 0.98 0.98 D.98 9.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.9$ 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 194 823 297 82 679 355 129 324 39 390 349 194 RTOR Reductknr NO) 0 0 195 0 0 253 0 0 32 0 41 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 194 823 99 82 679 102 116 337 7 317 581 0 Confl, Peds. (#(hr) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Confl. Bikes (A'hr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehlctes 5% 21% 2% 2% 4% 2% 311,3 2% 311,10 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prat NA Perry Prct NA Perm spilt NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 fi 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 a 2 Actuated Green, G (s} 8.5 32.2 32.2 3.9 27.6 27.8 17.0 17.9 17.0 75.1 25.1 Effective Green, g (s) 8.5 32.2 32.2 3.9 27,6 27.6 17.0 ITU 17.0 25.1 25.1 Actuated g C Rano 0.09 9.33 0.33 9.04 0,28 0!29 0.18 4.18 0,18 4,26 0;26 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehde Extension fs} 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3,0 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vphf 294 1184 529 139 995 447 281 597 271 42€3 833 V+s Ratio Prat c0.ID6 0.23 0.02 0.20 0.07 e0.10 c0.20 0.18 Vs Ratio Perm ME 0.07 0.00 v.'c Ratio 0.66 13.70 0.19 4.59 0,68 0,23 0.41 0. 0,03 0.78 0.70 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 42.5 27.7 22.7 45A 30.4 26,2 35.2 35,2 32.7 32.7 32,1 Progression Factor 1.09 1.00 1.30 1.00 1.90 1.04 1.00 1 90 Ufo 1.00 9.40 Inc'ernental Delay, d2 5.3 3.4 0.8 F,.3 3.8 1.2 1.0 1.2 9,C 7.5 2.6 Delay (s) 47.7 31.1 215 51.6 342 27.4 36.2 37.4 32.8 40.2 34,7 Level of Service D C C D C C D 1) C D C Appfuauh Delay (.sl 31.9 33,3 36.8 36.6 Approach LA'S C C L' D tntatsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 34.0 HCM 7009 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated C be Length (s-) 06,2 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 Intamectlon Capacity Utilization 73.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysts Period train) 15 c Grttical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2C29 PM WO I RaUtO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2721 Intersection ht Fly)' s•veh 1.4 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions - 239.9 0 r B t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 14 83 83 1122 1229 17 Future Vol, vehlh 14 83 83 1122 1220 17 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 4 a 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - YWd Storage Length 144 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Malian Stmager # 0 - - 4 0 Grade, % fl - - 0 4 Peak Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 MAvint Flow 14 86 88 1157 1267 18 Majo!-Ura Mincx2 Majorl Majior2 Conflicting Flovu PJI 2596 1267 0 - 0 Stage 1 1267 - _ - _ Stage 2 1 329 - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 4.12 - - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Maneuver 28 0 548 Stage 1 266 0 - - 5lage 2 247 a - Platoon blocied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 24 548 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuver 24 - - - - Stage 1 223 - - - - - Stage 2 247 . Approach m NO �t3 HGM Control Delay, s 239.9 0.9 4 HCM LOS F mhor UrWmajor MMl,smnt NBL IWMI' EBLrr1 EBLn 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 5418 - 24 HGM Lane V.'C Rollo 0.156 - 0.43 - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 12.8 - 239.9 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F it - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) DA - 1.3 - - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2C29 PM WO 4; ROLItE3 11 & I lUalalai Rd (South � 1 c12.2n21 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h 1.9 Movement WBL WBIR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonriguretions 0 12 - r 1 A B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) f Traffic Vol, vchrh 14 71 1139 4 61 1252 Future Vol, vehlh 14 71 1139 4 61 1252 ConiticOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Yield - None Storage Langlh fl 0 - - 0 - Veh in Mediar9 Starager # 0 - 4 - - li Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 MAvint Flow 14 73 1174 4 63 1291 Major"Oa Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flovu AJI 2593 0 0 11 TI 0 Stage 1 1176 - - - - - Stage 2 1417 - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.47 - - 4.18 - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.47 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.47 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 - - ?-.272 - Pol CW 1 Mammar 27 0 T - 574 - Stage 1 2M 0 - - 5lage 2 2.18 0 _ _ - Platoon blocied, % - - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver 24 - - - 574 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuver 24 - - - - Stage 1 2$£r - - - - Slage 2 194 . Approach m NO 813 HQM Control Delay, s 28,-).$ 0 0.6 HCM LOS F mhor Corm major MMlvmt NIST NBRWBLAlWBLrk2 SBL SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 24 - 574 - HGM Lane V.'C Rat#o - - 0.601 - 0. ii - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 285.8 0 12 - HCtwf Lane LDS - IF A B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1.8 - 0.4 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 8 Tin7ir(l,b 2029 PM WO :n: Rc Lite I, & PuaptlaaflUi St 1 12:71t`I ---W f- *--- t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBIR Lane CDnfiguratians + r t r V t ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 199 23 115 50 23 104 105 817 58 142 1022 100 Future Volume (vph) 199 23 116 50 23 104 105 817 58 142 1022 100 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+p# NA Perm prn+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 8 $ 8 5 2 2 1 n 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 22.5 22.5 9.5 2Z5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 57.8 57.8 5.7 58,0 58,0 Total SPI rt(%) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 10.6114 64.2°!n 64.2% 10.8°, 64.4% 64.4% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse None None None None Nore Max Max None Max Max Aat Eftct Green (s) 16.8 16.6 16.E 16,6 16.6 16.6 56.3 53.3 53.3 56.7 53.5 53.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.19 0.19 O.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.66 0.60 0.60 0.66 0.60 0.60 vie Ratio 0,84 0.07 0.32 0.20 0,47 0.29 0.62 0.76 0,06 0.49 9.94 0.11 Control Delay 62.6 30.0 8.3 32.4 30.0 8.6 26.8 19.0 1.7 10.2 315 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.17 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.6 30.0 8.3 32.4 30 0 8.5 26.6 19.0 1.7 10.2 33.5 1.9 LOS E C A C C A C B A B G A App, cauh Letay 41.7 13.2 18,8 28.3 Approach LOS 1] B B C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length;: 88.6 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: 0.94 Inteisecllan Signal Nlay: 26,0 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 88,51A ICU Level of 5envicc E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases:5. Route 11 & Puua aanui st } \0131 1 oz IRWR now 05 7 06 0 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2029 PM WO 5; Route 11 &, Puapuaanul St 11112-2021 I'4layament EBD. EBT EBR '4VBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t iif I I t ji' � + r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 199 23 116 50 23 104 145 917 58 142 1022 100 Future Volume ;vehlh) 199 23 116 50 23 144 105 917 58 142 1022 100 initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D} 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.1O 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 1$74 1626 1870 1855 1841 1870 1870 1 874 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 216 25 0 52 25 0 114 842 0 146 1054 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.+92 0.92 4.97 0,92 0,07 0.92 0.97 0,97 0.97 0,97 U.92 Percent Heavy Veh, °!c 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 ? 4 2 2 2 Cap,vehl11 326 350 326 350 229 1122 W 1135 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.00 0,10 0.19 •0.00 0.05 0.60 100 Q.06 0.61 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1385 1870 1595 1386 3870 1547 1781 1855 1560 1751 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 216 25 G 52 25 0 11.4 842 0 146 1054 0 Grp Sat F1cvv(s),vehlhlln 13BG 1870 1585 1386 18701 1547 1781 1856 1560 1781 1870 1555 Q Serves -s), s 13.4 1.0 D.G 2.8 1.0 0.0 2.1 29.4 0.0 2.7 44.8 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 14.4 1.0 0.0 3.8 1,0 0.0 2.1 29.4 4.0 2,7 44.5 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 UG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh h 326 HO 326 350 229 1122 360 1135 VIC Ratio(X) 0.66 0.07 0.16 0.07 0,50 0.75 0.41 0.93 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 349 382 349 382 235 1122 367 1135 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.40 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 O.On Uniform Delay (d), slueh 35.5 29.5 0.0 31.1 29.3 0.0 19.6 12.6 0,0' 11.7 15.6 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 4.3 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 1.7 0 0,0 0.7 14.3 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.8 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.4 0.0 1,5 11.0 +0.0 1.0 20.8 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay. slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 39.7 29.6 0.0 31.3 29.6 0.0 21.3 17.2 0.0 12.4 30.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C C C C B B C Appfoauh Vol, veli h 241 A 77 A 956 A 12DO A Approach Delay, s.,veh 38.7 30.8 17.7 27.8 Approach LCIS D C B C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 # 6 PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.4 57.8 21.0 9.2 58.0 21.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.2 53.3 18.4 5.0 5151 1$.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 4.7 31.0 16,4 4.1 46.8 5.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 61 0.1 0.0 4.2 0.1 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 25.1 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2C29 PM WO 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakim Stroot 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht Fly)• s.veh ?.7 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions HCM 95th %file 0(veh) r t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 325 340 983 1157 0 Future Vol, vehih 0 325 340 983 1157 0 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - YWd Storage Length 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclar 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Veh?cies, % 5 2 2 3 2 6 MAvint Flaw 0 332 347 1003 1181 0 MajorriVtinar Minar2 MsjW major Conllicbng Flovu AJI 2878 - 1181 0 - 0 Stage 1 1181 - - - Stage 2 1897 - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.4.8 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.48 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.48 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Maneuver 17 g 591 Stage 1 283 0 - - 5lage 2 157 0 Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 7 - 591 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 7 - Stage 1 117 - - - - - Stage 2 157 Appnoaoh m NO 8B HCM Control Delay, s 0 5 0 HCM LOS A mhor UrWmajor MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 591 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,587 - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 19.4 - 0 A HGNI Lane LDS C - A A - - HCM 95th %file 0(veh) 3.8 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tin7ir(l,b 2029 P ",10 (; Rc Lite} 1 & -�iko Strr ; t 1 12:2721 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET NBL NBT NIBf 1. aPT 83R Lane Configuratians 1� ' T4 ' + r f ' Traffic Volume (vph) 113 30 52 39 37 929 64 20t) 1062 188 Future Volume ,wphj 143 31) 52 39 37 929 64 200 1062 188 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pt NA Perm pm4pt NA Form Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 9.5 22.5 2.2.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9,5 78.2 78.2 16.8 85.5 85.5 Total SPI it(%) 16.155 16.1% 16.1% 16.1% 631/o 55.9% 55.9% 12.a°lo 61.1% 61.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 110 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,6 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Oplirnize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Nvre Ncne None None Max Max None Max Max ActEffutGreen (8) 15.4 15.4 13.5 13,8 79.0 73.9 73.9 9€5.8 63.4 83.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 0.12 0,10 0.10 0.59 0.55 0.55 H8 0,62 0.62 rile Ratio 0.74 0.34 0.36 0.87 0;33 0.95 0.07 0.96 0.95 0.19 Control Delay 80.4 30.2 61.4 49.8 17,3 47.7 4.3 90.6 42.9 5.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.0 0.0 9.0 O.i} 0.0 L,0 Total Delay 54,4 30.2 61.4 4$.8 17.3 47.7 4.3 90.E 42.9 5.7 LOS F C E 0 E D A F L) A Apprcauh Deiay 62.7 52.1 43.6 44.7 Approaeh LOS E 13 0 13 Inters on Summa, Cycle Length: 14Q Actuated Cycle Length; 133.5 Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type; ,Actuated-Unvmrdinaled Maximum vac Rana: 0.96 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay: 46,4 Intersection LOS. Q Intemdon C. acity UN zation 98.Vi) ILLI Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 & Laka Street NO a } 3 ! 02 05 t oe 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 13 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2029 PM WCC T; Route 11 & Lake Street 1 U12.202'I ---w '---• I'4layament EBS. EBT EBR >1WBL W'BT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 T V + T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 143 30 48 62 39 218 37 92.9 64 200 1462 488 Future Volume ;vehih) 143 30 48 62 39 218 37 929 64 260 1062 188 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.CD 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No Na No 04 Sat Rove, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1655 1856 1870 1856 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 149 31 0 65 41 0 39 958 0 208 1106 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0A 0.96 0,96 0.96 0, R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 i 5 5 3 ? P 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 178 190 94 96 206 1186 303 1248 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 C,.PC 9.05 0.05 •D-110 0.03 0.54 UC U6 D.67 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 149 31 G 65 41 0 39 608 0 208 1106 0 Grp Sat Flovv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 10.1 1.8 D.a 4.4 2.5 4.0 0.9 47.8 U-0 4.0 53.5 0,4 Cycle fD clear(g_c), s 10.1 1.8 0.0 4.4 2,6 0.0 0.9 47.8 0,0 4.8 58.5 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 D.DG 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0147 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehih 178 190 94 96 206 1186 303 1248 VIC Ratio(X) 0.84 0.16 J 69 0.43 0,19 0.92 0.69 0.89 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 2601 277 264 2.71 226 1185 380 1248 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.170 1.00 10 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.04 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 53.5 49.8 0_0 50.5 55.7 0.0 20.3 16.5 0.0 21.3 16,5 0,0 her Delay (d2). slveh 14.2 0.4 G,0 8,8 3.0 0.0 DA 6.3 0,0 3.7 9.5 0.47 In!t at Q Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0 1) +0.0 0.0 0A 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfDftD(54°l9),vehfln 5.2 0.9 0.0 2.2 1.3 0.0 0.5 20,9 0.41 3.8 26.9 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 67.7 512 0.0 65.3 58.7 0.0 20.8 21.8 0.0 24.9 261.0 0.41 LnGrp LOS E D E E C i C C Apprcat h Val, veli h 180 A 106 A 1007 A 1314 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 64.7 62.7 22.E 25.8 Approach LOS E E C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 .2 4 5 6 B PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.5 82.1 16.9 8.2 85.5 1 110 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 12.3 73.7 18.0 5.0 81.0 1$.D Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 6.8 49.8 12.1 2.9 60.5 6.4 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.3 8.7 0.3 0.0 10,0 0.2 Intersection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 28.8 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Tinilr-gs 2029 FM VIVO 8. Rc Lite} 1' &Cr>I1v i1r1111a III Road11:12,2021 Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases; 6: Haute 11 & Kamm hameha III KWU tat 06 133 • 07 1 tO8 5.00 pm Baseline Syrnchro 10 Report Page 16 -*--- 1 I Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NBT 5BL SST Lane Configurations 4 r 4:� 1 T 1 +14, Traffic Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 606 19 622 Future Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 606 19 622 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prat HA Prat NA Protected Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permitlad Phases 2 Qetectof Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 9.5 23.5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.5 30.5 30,0 4.6 35.0 9.5 34.9 Total SPI rt(%) 29.0°la 29.E 28.6% 9.1% 33.3% 9.0% 33.2% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 A kRed Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{1 7.0 1,0 I'D 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Gptirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None Max None Max Act Eftct Green (s) 20.4 .20.4 6.9 53 35.7 5.2 31.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0.27 4.27 UR 0.07 0.46 0.07 0.42 vie Raba 0.74 0.11 a23 0.54 0.74 0.16 0.67 Control Delay 36.6 1.0 26.2 57.0 28.4 42.0 21.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Q,0 0.0 6.0 0.4 0.0 Total Dolay Xu 1.0 26.2: 57.0 25,4 42,0 21.8 LOS ♦D A C E C Q C Appicauh De!ay 31.8 26,2 31.11 22.3 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglth:105 Actuated Cycle Length; 75 Natural Cycle: 105 Control TyDe: Semi Act-1lncoord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0,74 Inteisectlan Signal Delay27.1 Intersectlan LOS: C Intemdon Capacity LJGlization 73.21, ILLI Level of 5eNce D Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases; 6: Haute 11 & Kamm hameha III KWU tat 06 133 • 07 1 tO8 5.00 pm Baseline Syrnchro 10 Report Page 16 FIC;Pr1 6,11 Sir;rtalizod Ir-tt�rsoctiorl Surilnla-y 2,J29 PM 'NO 8; ROUte 1 ` -Carly--iar11e11a III Road 1 ` If 2721 EBL > EBR 1NBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 2 4 r 6 :k a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s I. 8.2 I +T. 6.2 Traffic Volume (vehfh) 325 11 52 7 11 20 64 606 11 19 622 316 Future Volume ;wehih) 325 11 52 7 11 20 64 EDE 11 19 622 316 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 tntefsection Summary 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0a 1.00 1.G0 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 1856 1767 1B11 1870 1$70 1870 18556 1855 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 342 12 D 7 12 21 67 639 12 20 655 0 Peak Hour Factor €,1.95 0.95 5.95 0,95 0,95 0,95 195 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 D.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 9 5 t 2 2 3 3 2 2 £ 2 Cap, vehlh 403 14 11 19 34 90 607 15 41 1481 Arrive On Gruen 0.25 0.25 0.00 0.04 0.04 •0.04 0.05 0.44 0.44 0.02 0,42 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1628 57 1535 297 509 890 1767 1815 34 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 354 0 Pr 40 0 0 67 r0 650 20 655 0 Grp Sat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 1685 0 1535 1695 0 0 1767 0 1849 1781 1777" 0 0 Servefs-s), s 14.6 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 4.0 2.7 0.0 22.0 0.8 9.6 O,Q Cycle 0 clear(g_c), 5 14,6 0.0 H 1.7 0,0 0.0 2.7 0.0 22.0 0.8 9.6 10 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.00 0.17 0.52 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.00 Lai7e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 417 0 65 0 0 90 0 823 41 1481 VJC Ratio(X) 0.85 0,00 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.74 0.00 0.70 0,49 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 601 0 993 0 0 124 D 623 122 1481 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.(10 1.Q0 1.00 1,170 1.00 1.0 1.801 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 26.1 0.0 C1_0 34.6 0.0 0.0 34.2 0.0 17.3 35.2 15.2 0,0 hor Delay (d). slveh 77 0.0 0.4 5.3 0.0 0.0 14.6 0.0 7.6 8.9 1.0 4.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 u.0 0.4 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfOftD(54°l9),vehrfln 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.4 1,5 0.0 9.5 0.4 3.5 0,0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 33,9 4.0 C1,0 43.9 0.0 0.0 4.8.8 0.0 25.0 44.1 16.2 10 LnGrp LCIS C A D A A D A C D B Appfcauh Vol, veli h 354 A 40 717 675 A Approach Delay, s�ve , 3J.9 43.9 27.2 17.0 Approach LOS C D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 22.6 8.2 34.9 7.3 6.2 36.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 5.1 30.4 25.5 5.0 30.3 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 16.6 4.7 11,6 3.7 2,8 24.0 Green Ext Tome (p ), s 115 0.0 3.9 0.1 10.0 z tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 25.D HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 Appendix G Analysis Reports — Future With Project Conditions (2029) Tin7ir4lS 2029 AM 1: Falaiii Rd & RoLlte 11 1 c 12 2721 -' -i► 1 *--- * I r Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M tt M tlt e ++ r ' tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 71 544 21B 1M 828 42 243 192. 118 22 321 177 Futuro- 'Volume (vph; 71 544 218 166 828 42 243 192 118 22 321 177 Turn Type 'rot NA Perm. Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 Permibd Phases 4 5 2 5 Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 s 8 5 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 ED 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 95 36.5 38,5 9,5 38,5 38.5 9.,5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 10.7 38.5 38.5 15.0 42.a 423 18.8 51.3 51,3 10.2 423 423 Total SPI ft(%) 9.3% 33.5% 33.5% 13.170,E 37.21° 37.2°16 16.3% 44.TI/o 44.6% 8.9% 37,1% 37.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Y'e's Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Nome Max Max Nave Ncne None None Nave None Act Effct Green (s) 6,2 35.1 35.1 9,4 40.7 40.7 11.6 29k 29.0 5.8 17.1 17.1 Actuated grO Ratio 0.07 0.36 0.38 0.10 0.44 0.44 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.19 6.19 vie Ratio 0.34 0.44 0.32 0.49 0.56 0.05 0.58 0.17 0.20 0.20 9.50 0.41 Control Delay 49.2 24.5 5,1 46.3 23.5 0.1 45.3 22.9 5.3 50.3 35.4 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.4 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.2 24.5 5.1 0.3 23.5 4.1 45.3 22.9 5,3 50.3 35.4 U LOS D C A D C A 0 C A D D A Appicauh Letay 2.1.5 26,2 29,0 20.7 Approeah LOS C 0 C C Intersection Summa C+yCle Lenglth:115 Actuated Cycle Length:; 91,5 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe, Semi A-A-1lncoord Maximum u c Ratio: 0_58 Intersection Signal D] lay: 25.5 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersection Capacity U61izatiori 63.3 6 ILLI Level of 5eNce B Analysis Period [min) 15 and Phases-, Raute 11 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Ir,ttorsection Sunrune{y 2029 AM W 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 arrrent EBL EBT EBR 'WBL dlBT VVBR NEL Na MR SEL f SIS Lane Configurations �1 tt r tt ++ r Traffic Volume (veWh) 71 544 218 166 828 42 243 192 118 22 321 177 Future Volume ;wehlh) 71 544 218 166 828 42 243 192 118 22 321 177 Initial Q (02b), veal 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 4 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1,84 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1737 1767 1737 1 B41 1811 1841 1811 1870 1856 1870 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 72 555 0 160 845 0 248 198 0 22 328 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.38 0,98 0,98 0.98 198 0.98 0,98 0.98 0.98 D.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cep. vehlh 161 1536 253 1657 344 774 43 540 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.46 {1.00 0.07 0.48 •D.00 0.10 0.22 D.00 0.02 0.14 0.00 Sat Fiotia, veh h 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1560 3401 3554 1 a72 1781 3554 1 585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 72 555 C, 169 845 0 246 1K C'+ 22 328 0 Grp Sat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 1605 1678 1172 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1555 0 Serves -s), s 1.7 8.5 0.0 3.8 13.4 0.0 a.6 3.£ U.0 1.0 o -D 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 1.7 8.5 0.0 3.8 13,4 0.0 5.6 16 0,0 1.0 6.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,04 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 161 1536 253 1657 344 774 43 500 VJC Ratio(X) 0.45 0,36 0.67 0.51 0.72 0.25 Hi 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 250 1536 449 1667 612 2092 128 1707 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,0D 1.00 1.00 1.110 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.04 0.170 1.04 1.00 0.70 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.40 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 36.7 14.0 0.0 35.9 10.2 0.0 34.6 25.8 0.0 38.3 321 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 2.0 0.7 0.4 3.1 1.1 0.0 2.9 0.2 0,0 9.0 1.5 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 0.7 3.1 0.0 1.6 4.9 0.0 2.4 1.5 0.0 0.5 3.0 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 38,7 14.7 0.0 38.9 15.3 0.0 37.5 25.9 0.0 47.4 33.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Appfcauh Vol, vett h 627 A 1014 A 444 A 350 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 17.4 19.2 32.4 34.7 Approach LOS B B C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 21.8 10.4 401.9 12.5 15.7 8.5 42.8 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.7 46.8 10.5 34.0 14.3 38.2 E,2 38,3 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 3.0 5.6 5.8 10.5 7.6 8.9 3.7 15.4 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.3 0.2 3.7 0.5 2.2. 0.0 6.1 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 23.4 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2029 AM W 2: Henry St & Routo 11 1V12.202'I -' 9 t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SHT Lane Configuratians M tt r M +t 0 ' 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 10T 447 124 61 763 545 146 337 48 412 339 Future Volume (vph) 107 447 124 61 763 545 146 337 48 412 339 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prat NA Porro Split NA Perm so NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 Di3tectad Phase 7 4 4 3 g 8 2 2 6 n Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9.5 30.5 30,5 9.5 30.5 30.5 35.5 35.5 3a.5 35,5 35,5 Total Split (8) 10,0 32.9 32.9 10,1 33,0 33,0 36.5 36.5 36,5 35.5 35,5 Total SPI it(%) 8.7% 28.614 2a.6% 8.8% 28.7° 26.7% 31.7% 31.7% 31.7% 30.9% 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{1 7.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 LeadLag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None None None Act Eflet Green (s) 5.6 31.3 31.3 5.7 29.0 29.0 17.8 17.8 17.6 24.8 24.9 Actuated grC Ratio UG 0.33 D.33 0.06 0,30 0,30 0.19 0,19 0.19 0.26 0.26 vie Ratio 0.61 0.43 0,22 4.32 0,76 0,65 0.47 0,58 0.14 0.73 9.71 Control Delay 62,1 30.1 6.9 51.9 35.0 7.0 40.6 39.5 0.8 44.3 36.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17,0 D.0 4.0 0.0 o.0 0.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62,1 30.1 6.9 51.9 35.0 7.0 40,6 39.5 0,8 44.3 36.1 LOS E C A D D A D D A D D App, cauh Letay 30.9 26,3 36.3 38,9 Approe5h LOS C 0 D D Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 95.4 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Oncoord Nlaxirr um vlc Ratio: 0.76 Inteiseclion Signal Nlay. 31.9 Intersectlan LOIS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 89 8% ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: HenrySt & RaIUW 11 t 06 • 4 3 i77 05 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HI; M Signalized lntesection Capacity Analysts 2029 AM VV 2. Henry St & Route 11 11112.202'1 "eement E8L IEBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT IBR SBL SOT SBFT Lane Configurations M +t r M +'t 1 4+ 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 107 447 124 61 763 545 146 337 48 412 339 124 Future Volume (vph) 107 447 124 61 763 545 146 337 48 412 339 124 !deal Flow (vphpl) 1940 1900 19001 1900 1900 19000 1900 1944 1900 190€1 19M 1900 Total Lost lime {s) 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane 4ltil, Factcar 9.97 0.95 1.!}0 0.97 0.95 1.00 Q.91 9.81 1.00 0.91 0,81 Frpb, pedlbikes 1,40 1.00 Q.99 1.00 1,90 0,99 1,44 1.40 0,95 1.00 1,00 Flpb, pedfbikes 1W 1.00 1. DO 1100 1,90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,09 i,00 Frt IM 1.90 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 0,97 FIt Proteded 0,95 1,00 1.D1 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1,01} UQ 0.95 X0,99 Saud, Flaw (p;otf 3099 3282 1516 3303 3496 1548 1564 3348 1467 1595 3175 FR Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 9.95 1.00 1.04 0.95 1.09 1.00 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow (perrr) 3099 3282 1510 3303 3406 1548 1554 3348 1407 1595 3175 Peat[ -hour factor, Pict= 0.97 0-97 17.97 0.97 0., 7 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 110 461 128 63 787 2 151 347 49 425 349 128 RTOR Reductnarl NN 0 0 86 0 4 387 0 0 40 0 20 0 Lane Group Flow Nphl 110 461 42 63 787 175 136 352 9 302 580 0 Confl, Peds. (Nhr} 2 2 4 3 3 4 Confl. Bikes (thr) 1 Heavy Vehlcles 13% 10"/5 5% 6% 6% 3% 51A 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 a 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 5,6 31.3 31.3 4.3 30.0 30.0 17.6 17.8 17.8 24.8 24.8 Effective Green, g (s) 5.6 31.3 31,3 4,3 30,0 30,0 17,8 ITS 17.8 24.8 24,8 Actuated g C Ratio 0,06 9.33 0.33 0,04 0,31 0,31 0.19 0,19 0,19 4,26 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 V'ehde Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0_- 3.0 3.0 16 3.4 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph} 180 1067 493 147 1062 4 2 285 619 276 4'1 8 l 8 v+s Ratio Prot c9.[74 0.14 0.02 cO.23 0.09 u0.11 e0.19 0.18 Vs Ratio Perm 07,03 0.11 0,01 Oc: Ratio Q.61 0,43 HE 0,43 4.74 0.36 4:47 0.58 0,03 0.73 0.71 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 44.2 25.5 22.5 44.8 215_6 25.7 35,0 35,8 32.1 32.7 32,4 Progression Factor 1.44 1.00 1.30 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.94 1.Cr4 1.00 T.00 Inc-emental Delay, d2 6,0 1.3 0.3 2.0 4.7 2.1 1.2 1.4 O,C i~_7 2.8 Delay (s) 50.3 26.7 216 462 343 27,6 36.2 37.2 32.2 39.4 35.3 Le'v'el of Service D C C D C C 0 [? C 0 D Appfuauh Delay (sl 29.7 32,3 30 36.6 Approach LA'S C C D D tntarsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 313.0 r M 2f]i'.1,i Leve i of Sery jceC HC 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length (s-) 96,2 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.8% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period train) 15 c Grttical Lane Croup 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 PINI 1N 3: Route 11 & Hualalai Rd (North) 1111212021 Intersection ht 11"09Y s.veh r t .0 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions $.1488.3 0 r B t + r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 44 55 171 1275 963 30 Future Vol, vehih 44 55 171 1275 963 30 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 6 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - YAd Storage Length 140 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Stuager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor g3 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 5 2 PAvint Flow 47 �9 184 W1 1035 32 MajorVilna Minar2 Majbiri Maio, .1 Conflicting Flovu AJI 2775 1036 0 0 Stage 1 1036 - - - - - Stage 2 1739 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 8.42 4.12 - - - Critical Crit cal t4dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Mamuvar - 21 0 671 - � - Stage 1 342 0 - - 5lage 2 155 0 Platoon blocied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver •-15 - 57D - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar - 15 - Stage 1 24-8 Stage 2 155 Appfoach ES No 813 HCM Control Delay, $146$.3 1.5 0 HCM LOS F MinorLanierMabr Mvml NBL NBT EBLra1 EBLQ SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 670 - 15 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,274 - 3.154 - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 12,4 $.1488.3 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F A - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 1.1 - 6.7 Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWcifl Not Defined `; Afl major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Basetine Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 PINI W 4: Route 11 & Hualalai Rd (South) 11112-2021 Inlerseclion Int "'e.Ny s.veh 1.4 movemeni Y4'BL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonriguretions 0 14.1 - r 1 A B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) f Traffic Vol, v&Vh 9 140 1305 15 73 939 Future Vol, vehlh 9 140 13p5 1s 73 939 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Yield - None Storage Langlh 0 0 - - 0 - Veh in Malian Slarat er # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 Peale Hour Faclor k 93 83 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 a 5 PAvml Flow 10 151 1403 16 78 1010 Mejor"Oa Minorl Majorl MajoI Conllicbng Flovu AJI 2577 - 0 0 1403 0 Stage 1 1411 - - - - - Stage 2 1166 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 - - 4.15 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ _ _ 2.254 Poo CW1 Mammar 78 0 T - 474 - Stage 1 225 0 Slage 2 296 0 _ _ - _ Platoon blocied, ''k - - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver 23 - - - 474 - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 23 - - Stage 1 225 Slage 2 247 Approach m NO �B HGM Control Delay, s 247.1 0 1 HCM LOS F Mhor Lorin major vvmt NBT N8RW8Lr11WBLrr2 SBL S6T Capacity (veWh) - W 23 - 474 - HGM Lane V.'C Ralia - 0.421 - 0.166 - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 247.1 0 14.1 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F A B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1.2 - D.6 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Tinlir(l,b 2029 AM W 37: RUUtCl 1' & P1,laPL1aallUl St 11,12.2021 "I" *^ t -01 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Confieuratians t r I t t '� + r Traffic Volume (vph) 193 9 75 112 59 140 104 991 27 43 838 68 Future Volume (vph) 193 9 75 112 59 140 104 991 27 43 838 fib Turn Type Perm NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 8 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 9,6 58.0 5aC, 9.5 57.9 57,9 Total SPI rt(%) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0° 25.0% 10.7% 64.4°/a 64,4°!e 10.6% 84.3°f: 154.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 6.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Nene None Ncrii3 Nc.ne None None Nare Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 16.4 16.4 18.4 18,4 16.4 W4 50.7 55.7 55.7 57.7 53.8 53,8 Actuated gr C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0,19 _.,19 0.19 0.19 0.68 0.64 0.64 0.67 0.62 6.62 vie Ratio 0.83 0.03 0.22 0.45 0.18 0.35 0.40 0.89 0.63 4.25 0.79 0.07 Control Delay 62.3 29.3 9.1 37.7 31.5 8.2 8.7 26.6 0.0 7.7 20,5 2.2 Queue Delay 0.6 0.0 0,0. 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.3 29,3 9.1 37.7 31.5 8,2 8.7 26,6 0,0 7,7 20,5 2,2 LOS E C A D C A A C A A C A App, cauh Letay 46.$ 23.1 24.3 18.6 Approach LOS D 0 C S Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 86.7 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Maximum, We Ratio: D_89 Inteiseclion Signal Dalay: 24.5 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersedon Capacity UUizatiori 34,9�"k ILLI Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Sun-tmi+ary 2029 AM VV 5; Route 11 & Puapuaanui St 11!12.202'I P'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL VVFBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBI Lane Configurations I t r I t t [i' � T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 193 9 75 112 59 140 104 991 27 43 838 68 Future Volume ;wehih) 193 9 75 112 59 140 104 991 27 43 838 68 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,a0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 1$70 1870 1870 1856 1870 1870 1826 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 310 10 0 119 64 0 113 1054 0 46 891 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.D2 0.94 0,92 0.94 0.92 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,34 3.32 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 3 2 2 5 2 Cep, vehlh 311 376 357 376 305 1133 201 1088 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 Cala 0.110 0.05 0.51 O.00 0.04 0,50 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1338 1870 1595 1405 1870 1585 1781 1856 1585 1781 1826 1585 Grp Volume(v . vehfh 210 10 G 119 64 D 113 1054 D 46 891 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1338 1870 1585 1405 1870 1585 1781 1856 1585 1781 1826 1555 0 Serve{s_s), s 13.8 0.4 O.G 6,7 2:5 0.0 2.1 45.9 U-0 0.9 14.5 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 16.3 0.4 0.0 7.0 2,5 0.0 2.1 45.11 OX 0.9 34.5 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.DG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.DO L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veN b 311 376 3,57 376 805 1133 201 1W8 VJC Ratio(X) 0.67 0.03 0.33 0 17 0,37 0.93 0.23 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 311 376 357 376 313 1183 232 1988 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,3{1 1.00 1.90 1.170 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.04 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 D.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 36.4 28.8 0.0 31.6 29.6 0.0 14.0 15.7 0,0 18.3 14.3 0.0 her Delay (d2). siveh 5.7 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.7 14.5 0.0 0.6 6.9 0.0 In!t at Q Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.9 0,2 0.0 2,3 1.1 0.4 1.0 21.2 0.41 0.5 14,5 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 42•D 28.8 0.0 32,1 29.8 0.0 14.8 30.3 0.0 18.9 21.2 10 LnGrp LOS D C C C S C B C Apprcauh Vol, veb!h 220 A 183 A 1167 A 937 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 41.1 31.3 b.� 21.1 Approach LOS D C C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 d Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 59.1 22.5 9.2 57.9 22.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.0 53.5 18,0 5.1 53.4 1$.D Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 2.9 47.9 18.3 4.1 30,5 9.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,0 3.6 U 0.0 6,5 0.4 tntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 27,2 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2029 AM W 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakim Stroot 1 c12.2021 Intersection ht 099 s.veh 12.8 10lovemenI EEL EBR NB NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions H M 95th %file 0(veh) r t f r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 0 159 605 968 977 2 Future Vol, vehlh 0 159 605 966 972 2 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 g 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - b'Wd Storage Length 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Mediar9 Stmager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 4 2 5 5 7 PAvint Flow 0 171 651 1041 1045 2 Mejo!-Ura Mincf2 Majorl MajoI Conflicting Flow AJI 33$13 - 1045 0 - 0 Stage 1 1045 - - - - - Stage 2 2343 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42 4.12 - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Maneuver 6 0 666 Stage 1 339 0 - - Slage 2 77 0 - Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 666 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 0 - Stage 1 a Stage 2 77 Approach NO S� HGM Control Delay, s 0 20.8 6 HCM LOS A MinorLanielftx Mvml NBL NBT EBLra1 EBLn2 5BT SBR Capacity (vehh) 666 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,977 - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 54,2 - 0 0 HGNI Lane LDS F - A A - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) 141 - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tlnlir(l,b 2029 AM W (; R[ �Ite} 1 ` -mks trr ! lL kc� S€r t 1 Ic 12;772'1 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR S6L .'aBT M Lane CDnfiguratians 11 T4 ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 976 55 184 822 146 Future Volume (vph) 283 46 85 39 33 976 55 154 822 146 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt GSA PiNm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum '01 ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 23,0 23,0 9,5 78.0 79.0 12A 61,5 81.5 Total SPI it(%) 18.6% 18.6% 16.4% 16.4% 6.8o 56A 56A% 8.6% 55.2% 58.2° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,3 4,5 4,5 Lead,tag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Nave None None None Max PAax None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 21.5 .21.5 18.5 18.5 79.5 74,5 74.5 84.9 78.9 78.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.61 0.5E 0,56 vie Ratio 1.11 0.42 0.39 1.13 0.20 1.05 0.07 1.23 0.84 0.16 Control Delay 140.7 39.4 61.1 125,3 13.4 74.2 1.6 181.3 35.1 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17,0 0 0 0,0 0.0 0.17 0.4 0.0 L,0 Total aolay 140.7 39.4 61,1 125.3 13.4 74,2 1.6 181,3 35.1 5.4 LOS F to E F B E A F D A Apprcauh Le!ay 111.1 112.6 68.6 52A Approach LOS l= E E p Intersection Summa Cycle Lengths 140 Actuated Cyde Length; 140 Natural Cyde: 140 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Rata: 1.23 Inteiseclion Signal Celay: 74.4 Intersectlon LOS E Intertion Capacity Utilization 112,1% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7, Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street \001 I oz 4 �s 05 � 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 13 H M 6th Signalized Intc--rsoction SUn-ima{y 2029 AM W T; Route 11 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I -� *� `► ,� l'4layament EBS. EBT M '411BL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t r t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 07611 55 164 822 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 283 46 69 85 39 305 33 976 55 164 822 146 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1_CI0 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Dat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 3870 1870 1810 1870 1441 1611 1856 1870 Adj Row Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1438 0 174 8874 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 4.94 0.94 0,94 0!94 0,94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cep,vehl11 294 308 120 127 261 1069 174 1116 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.00 9,07 O,07 0.110 0.03 0.57 Ei,00 Q.06 0.60 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856: 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 0 35 100 0 174 874 0 Grp Sat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 18'5& 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 21.5 3.1 D.a C 5 2.7 4.0 1.0 69.7 U-0 7.5 46.3 0,4 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, s 21.5 3.1 0.0 6.5 2,7 0.0 1.0 69.7 0.17 7,5 46.3 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 O.DD 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.D0 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veN b 294 808 120 127 261 1049 174 1116 VJC Ratio(X) 1.02 0,17 11,75 0.32 0,13 0.47 1.00 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 294 608 251 265 .280 1469 174 1116 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.110 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveh 54.4 46.7 (1_0 5n.7 57.9 0.0 118.0 26.9 U 35.4 19.6 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 59,0 0.2 0,0 8.9 1.4 4.0 11.2 21.4 0.0 69.4 5.5 0.13 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacicf0ftn(54°l9),vehfln 14.4 1.5 O,D 3.2 1.3 Ct,(1 DA 35,8 0.0 9.0 20.8 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 113.4 47.0 0.0 88,6 59.3 0.0 118.2 48.3 0.0 107.8 25.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D E E B ID F C Appfoauh Vol, vett h 352 A 131 A 1073 A 1048 R Approach Delay, s�ve , 1L,3.d 6 5. 7 47.3 33.8 Approach LOS F E C D Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.0 79.0 2611.0 8.1 82,9 13.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 1.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s T5 74.5 21.5 5.0 77.4 1815 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 9.5 71.7 23.5 3.0 483 8.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.9 0 0 0.0 7.8 0.3 tnte-fsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 52.5 HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- arse;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Timings 2029 AM 8, Kamehameha III Road & Route 11 11112!2021 Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: 6: Kamenarnena Ill KOM & Kwe 11 1.*aa "*07 1 tO8 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 -11111. t Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NBT 8BL SST Lane Configuratians 4 r 4:4 1 T +1 Traffic Volume (vph) 5 26 12 76 599 16 533 Future Volume (vph) 5 26 12 Ifs 599 16 533 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot HA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permitlad Phases 2 Qetectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 30.0 36.0 XG 9,5 23.5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 3U 13.8 45,4 9.6 41.2 Total SPI it(%) 26.1% 26.1°x, 26.1% 12.0% 39.5% 6.39 35.8% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.8 All -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 1 eQ 1.0 1.0 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode Nene None None None Max None Max Act Effct Green (S) 15.2 15.2 7.3 B.6 47.6 5.2 40.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.18 0.18 O.G9 0.10 0.58 O.G6 0.49 vie Raba 0.64 0.08 0.30 0:48 0.64 0.15 0.57 Control Delay 41.9 0.5 32.0 48.2 24.2 44.8 17.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 D.O Total aolay 41.9 4.5 32,0 48.2 20,2 44,tj 17.6 LOS D A C D C D B App, cauh De!ay 36.9 32.a 23.3 18.1 Approe5h LOS D C 0 B Intersection Summary Cycle Length:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 823 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum We Ratio: 0.64 Inteiseclion Signal Delay; 22.6 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 64.9°A ILLI Level of SeNce C Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: 6: Kamenarnena Ill KOM & Kwe 11 1.*aa "*07 1 tO8 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 H M kith Signalized Intersection Surnmary 2029 AM W 8; Kamehameha Ill Road & ROL& 11 11112.202'1 I'4layament EBL EBT EBF WBL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBO Lane Configurations 4 r V 1 0 Traffic Volume (veWh) 182 5 26 16 12 17 76 599 15 16 533 334 Future Volume {vehih) 182 5 205 16 i2 17 76 599 15 16 533 334 Initial Q (02b), veto 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 01 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.04 0.95 1.010 0.98 1.40 1,00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.40 1.010 1.Do 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.0101 1.00 1.001 1.0101 1,00 1.0101 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1811 1870 1722 1874 1781 17D6 1752 1811 1870 1370 1811 1811 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 196 5 D 17 13 1a 82 64-4 1G 17 573 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 OX 8.93 0,93 0,93 0.93 0.93 8,93 0.93 0,93 D.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 2 12 2 8 7 10 n [ 2 6 fi Gap,vehi11 256 7 24 18 25 103 955 24 35 1744 Arrive On Gruen 0.15 0.15 O.D4 0,0 0,94 9.44 01,06 0.55 a,55 0.92 :i.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1739 44 1459 5019 435 603 1668 1758 44 1751 3532 0 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 201 0 D 48 0 D 82 0 660 17 573 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1783 0 1459 16018 0 0 1668 0 1802 17811 1721 0 0 Servefs_s), s 8.1 0.9 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 19.4 0.7 7.3 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_c), 5 8.1 0,0 0.0 2.2 0,0 0.0 3.6 0.0 19A 0.7 7.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 0.35 0,37 1.40 0,02 1.00 0 -CIO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 252 0 88 0 0 103 D 969 35 1744 VJC Ratio(X) 0.77 HO 0,11 0.00 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.67 0,48 0.33 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 610 0 550 0 0 298 D 989 122 1744 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1,00 1,x 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.04 1.00 01.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 30.5 0.0 0.0 38.2 0.0 0.0 34,5 01.0 12,0 36.1 10,9 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 4.6 0.0 01.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 12.6 O.D 3.+6 9.7 0.5 4.10 In!t al 0 Delay(Q) siveh 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirO}ftD(54°l9),vehfln 17 OA 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 7.0 0.4 2.4 0,0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 35.2 0.0 01.0 47.8 0.0 0.0 47.1 01.4 15.5 45.8 11.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A D A A D A B D B Appfcauh Vol, veli h 201 A 48 742 590 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 35.2 47.8 19.0 12.4 Approach LOS D D 5 B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rq s 15.5 9.1 42.3 7.6 6.0 45.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 25.5 9.3 36,7 25.5 5.1 40.9 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 10.1 5.6 5.3 4.2 2.7 21.4 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 0.9 0.0 3.7 0,2 0.01 4.0 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 19.5 HCl`A 6th LOS 0 N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- []rias;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 H C M 6, 11 T' VSC. 2029 AM VV 9.. Rout€ 1' & Rayed Vistab 1` 122 -ill Inter ee ion Int DelFy. siveh3.el Movement W13L WB€;~ NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonligurations HGM Control Delay (s) r f r HCtwf Lane LDS - - F Traffic Vol, v&Vh 29 108 W8 25 22 950 Future Vol, vehlh 29 108 968 25 22 950 CeniticOng Peds, Or 0 0 a 0 0 0 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Yield - W'lefd - None Storage Langih fl 0 - 500 500 - Veh in Median Starager # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - 9 - - D Paak Hour Faclor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Wrnt Flow 32 117 1052 27 24 1033 Major"Oa Minorl Majorl Majior2 Conflicting Fluvu PJI 2133 1052 0 0 1952 0 Stagy; 1 1452 - - - - - Slage 2 1081 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 9.42 6.22 - - 4.12 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.3t$ - - ?-.218 Poo CW1 Mar mver 54 278 - - 662 - Stage 1 336 5lage 2 328 - _ _ _ _ Platoon blocied, ''k - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 52 275 - 662 - tJlav Cup -2 Maneuver 52 - - - - Slage 1 336 - - - - Stage 2 314 . Approach m N8 SB HGM Control Delay, s 53,2 0 0.2 HCNI LOS F Minor Lanielftx Mvml NBT NBRWW'BLOWBU2 S8L SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 52 275 662 - HGM Lane V.'C Rat#o - - 0.606 0.427 0.036 - HGM Control Delay (s) - - 14.9.1 27.5 10,f3 - HCtwf Lane LDS - - F D B FILM 95th %file 0(veh) - 2.4 2 0,1 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 19 Tin7ir(lS 2029 PM 1: Falaili Rd & RULJ 11 1 c12:7321 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL [ABT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians �1 tt r M +� tt I "fit r Traffic Volume (vph) X0 1059 503 227 739 115 227 283 272 56 313 107 Future Volume (vph) 260 1059 5G3 227 739 65 227 283 272 56 313 107 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prot iqA Porro Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 5 Qetectc,r Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9,5 36.5 38,5 0.6 38,5 38.5 9.5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 16.3 410 43.G 14.0 4C,7 40,7 14,0 44.2 44,2 13.8 44,0 44.0 Total SPI it(%) 14.2% 37.4°1,, 37.43E 12.2% 35.4° 35A% 12.2% 38,4.!! 3B.4% 12,0% 38.311/4 38.391/0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.f3 1,0 1.G 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,6 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max Nave Ncne None Norio None None Act Eflut Green (s) 112 38.9 38.9 9.5 37.2 37.2 9.5 2a.7 20.7 7.9 16.9 16.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 0.42 D.42 0,10 0,40 0.40 0.10 4.22 0.22 0.08 0.18 6.18 vie Ralio 0.65 0.74 11.58 0.66 0,54 0.10 0.67 0.37 0.50 0.38 0.50 0.29 Control Delay 48.5 28..2 8.6 52.0 250 2.4 52.3 32.4 7,4 50.4 36.0 7.8 Queue Delay 0.6 0.0 07 0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total delay 45,5 28.2 8.6 52,0 25.4 2.4 52.3 32.4 7.4 51)-4 36,0 7.8 LOS ID C A 0 C A 0 C A D 0 A App, cauh Lotay 25.7 29.5 29,5 31.3 Approeah LOS C 0 C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lei glth:115 Actuated Cycle Length; 93 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Unroord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 6.74 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay; 28.0 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter don Capaci#y Utilization 66 e% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 1; Palani Rd & Route 11 jai I T02 I f oI 05 I � 06 I 07 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Intersection SUn-ima{y 2029 PM W 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 '# 1 I'4layarnefrt EBL EBT EBR WBL dlBT VJBR NBL NET NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations'" Traffic Volume (vehfh) 20 1059 50 227 739 65 227 283 272 56 313 107 Future Volume ,vehlh) 260 1059 X03 227 730 65 227 283 272 56 313 107 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0C 1,00 1.Go 1.00 1,60 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,Gu 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1855 1856 1870 1870 1841 1870 1855 1870 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 265 1081 0 232 754 0 232 289 0 57 319 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,98 0,98 0,98 198 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,38 13.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 3 3 2 i 4 2 3 2 P 2 f 2 Gap, vehlh 351 1623 314 3569 313 674 78 505 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.46 {1.00 0.09 0,45 •0.00 0.09 0.19 UC 0.04 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3428 3526 1585 3456 3497 1585 3428 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 265 1081 G 232 754 0 2")2 289 0 57 3,19 0 Grp Bat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1515 1781 1777 1585 0 Serves -s), s 5.3 20.0 0.G 5.5 12.7 0.0 610 010 2.6 7.1 0,0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_c), 5 6.3 20.0 0,0 5.5 12,7 0.0 5.5 6.0 0.0 2.6 7.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehtlh 351 1623 314 1569 313 674 78 505 VJC Ratio(X) 0.75 0-67 0,74+ 0.48 0.74 0.43 0.73 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 484 1623 393 1569 390 1687 108 1679 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.00 1,00 10 1.170 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 0.00 1.00 1.04 O.DO 1.00 4.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 36.5 17.8 0.0 37.0 16.2 0.0 37.0 29.9 U 39.5 318 0,0 Mor Delay (d2). slveh 4.4 2.2 4.0 5.6 1.1 0.0 5.7 0.4 0,0 12.2 1.3 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.D 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 2.8 7.8 0.4 2.5 4.9 0.4 2,5 2.5 0.0 1.4 3.1 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 40.9 19.7 0.0 42A 17.3 0,0 42,8 30.9 0.0 51.7 35.1 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D D Appfoauh Vol, veli h 1346 A 966 A 521 A 376 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 23.9 23.2 35.9 37.6 Approach LOS C C D D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 20.4 12.1 43.0 12.1 16.4 13.1 42.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 9.3 39.7 9,5 38,5 9.5 39.5 11.8 36.2 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 4,8 8.0 7.5 22.0 7.5 9.1 8.3 14.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,0 2.0 0.2 7.0 0.2 2.2 0.3 5.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 27,2 HChA 6th LOS C Notes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2029 PM W 2: Henry St & Routo 11 1V12.202'I ,# -i►Ir t r Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL SK Lane Configuratians �1 tt r M +'t 1 0 � �i 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 853 291 84 700 3W 126 318 40 411 342 Future 'Volume (vph) 190 853 291 84 700 368 126 318 40 411 342 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prot NA Perm Skil NA Perm $Oil NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 G 6 Permitlad Phases 4 8 2. Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 s 8 2 2 2 & 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9.5 30.5 30,5 9.5 30.5 30.5 35.5 35.5 35,5 35.5 35,5 Total Split (s) 12.2 34.0 34.G 9 5 31.3 31.3 36.0 36.0 35,0 35.5 35,5 Total SPI it(%) 10.6% 29.6% 29.6% 8.3% 27.20 27.29 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 30.9% 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{t to 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.G 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Notre Max Max None Ncne Nave Nave None Aot Eflut Green (s) 7.8 32.2 32.2 6.1 27.2 27.2 17.0 17.0 1700 25.7 25.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.27 0.27 vie Raba 0.72 0.73 0.41 0.48 0;73 0.53 0.41 0,% 0.12 0.75 0.72 Control Delay 61.2 35.7 5,6 57.0 38.2 0,8 39.9 39.9 0.7 45.1 34.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 6.0 4.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 Total delay 61.2 35.7 5. C, 57.0 36.2 6.5 39.9 39.9 0.7 45-1 34.5 LOS E to A E D- A G D A D G App, cath Delay 32.7 29.5 36.8 38.2 Approach LOS C 0 1) D Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 96 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Ra#o: 0.75 Interseclion Signal Delay: 33.6 Intersectlan LOS: C Intersection CaPacify Utilization 74.4% ILLI Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: HenrySt & RaIUW 11 31 -PD4 07 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lnte' section Capacity Analysis 2029 PM W 2. Henry St & Route 11 11112.2021 '# - t I' oamerrt EEL EBT EBR WOL. WBT WER NBL NBT NBR SBL W SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt r t� 1 0 � ii 04 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 853 291 84 700 368 126 a18 40 411 342 190 Future Volume (vph) 190 853 291 844 700 368 126 318 10 411 342 190 !deal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 1904 1900 1504 1900 1900 1900 1900 190€1 1804 1900 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ubl. Fater 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Q.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frpb, pedlbikes 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1,00 0.99 1.44 1.90 0,98 1.00 -199 Flpb, pedtbikes 1M 1.00 1,00 1100 1100 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1,00 1,00 Frt I M 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 0,9.5 1,00 UO 4.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1,00 UQ 0.95 0,99 Saud, Flaw (protf 3335 3538 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1510 3195 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Setd, Flow (Derrnf 3.335 3539 15$3 3433 3471 1561 1.595 3382 1537 1917 3196 Peal[ -hour iaCtor, U'H'F 0.98 0.98 0.98 9.98 OM 0.98 0.98 0.98 D. 98 0.98 0.38 Oi 98 Adj. Flow(vph) 1R4 870 297 86 714 376 129 324 41 419 349 194 RTOR Reductknr (vph) 0 0 195 0 0 266 0 0 34 0 39 0 Lane Group Flow 4vphl 194 870 99 86 714 110 116 337 7 323 500 0 Confl. Peds. (#(1r) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Confl, Bikes (A'hr) 1 1 1 Heavy Vehlctes 5% 21% 2% 2% 4% 2% 311,3 2% 311,10 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prat NA Perry Prct NA Pew split NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 a 2 Actuated Green, G (s} 7.8 32.2 32.2 3.9 28.3 28.3 17.0 17.0 17.0 75.7 25.7 Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 32.2 32.2 3.9 28.3 28.3 17.0 ITU 17.0 25.7 25.7 Actuated g C Ratio 0.08 9.33 17.33 9.04 0,29 0. 0-18 0,18 0,18 0,27 0.27' Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 41.5 Vehde Extension (s} 3.0 3.0 10 10 3,4 10 3.0 10 3,0 3.0 3.0 Lana Grp Cap (vphf 268 1177 526 138 1014 .1�fi 2K r53 269 427 848 V+s Ratio Prat c0.ID6 X9.25 0.03 0,21 41,07' Cf.). 1,0 ct7.20 0.19 Vs Ratio Perm 0.0E 0.07 0.00 v.'c Ratio 0,72 0,74 0,10 4.62 0,70 0,24 0-41 0.57 0,03 0.76 0.71 Uniform Way, d1 43.4 28.6 23.0 45.7 30.5 25,1 35.5 3b,5 310 32.7 32,2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.40 1.30 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.{70 Inc'ernental Delay, d2 9.3 4.2 0.3 8.15 4,1 1.2 1.0 1!3 0.0 7.5 2.7 Delay (s) 52.8 32.8 23.8 54.2 34,6 27.3 36.5 37.8 33.1 40.1 34.9 Le'v'el of Service D C C D C C D D C D C Appfuauh Delay 33.7 331 37.1 36.6 Approach LA'S C C L' D tntatsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 34.8 HCM 74)4}0 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated Cycle Length (s-) 96,8 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 lntemectlon Capacity Utiliaatim 74.4% ICU Level of Service t3 Analysts Period train) 15 c Grttical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2029 PM I ROUtO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2021 Intersection ht FlyY s.veh 1.8 rvlovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions ' r B t t r Traffic Vol, vehrh 14 88 89 1181 1300 17 Future Vol, vehlh U 88 85 1191 1300 17 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 4 0 a 0 0 0 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Frr;e Free RT Channeiized - Free - done - Ykk Storage Length 144 Q 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Stuager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % fl - - 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor S7 97 97 97 97 97 HeavyVeh?cies, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 MAvint Flow 14 91 92 1218 1340 18 Mejo!-Ura Mincx2 Mal6r1 majol Conflicting Flovu AJI 2742 1340 0 - 0 Stage 1 1344 - - - - - Stage 2 1402 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.42 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Mweuver 22 0 514 - - Stage 1 244 0 - - 5lage 2 228 0 - Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 18 - 514 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 18 - - Stage 1 200 Stage 2 228 Approach M N B HGM Control Delay, s$ 355.4 0.9 0 HCM LOS F Mhor UrWmajor MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLr11 EBLn 'SBT SBR Capacity (vehh) 514 • 18 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,179 0.573 - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 13.5 -S 355.4 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F A - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) DA - 1.5 _ Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S: Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWcifl Not Defined `. Afl major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 PM W 4: Route 11 & Hualalai Rd (South) 11112-2021 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h movemeni ..4 Y4'BL WBIR NBT NBR SBL SBT LdnC- Gonligurations - - - r 1 - - - Crltical Hdwy t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 14 71 1204 4 61 1325 Future Vol, vehih 14 71 1204 4 61 1329 CeniticOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channeiized - Free - 'Yield - None Storage Lenglh fl 0 - - 0 - Veh in Mediar1 Slarat er # 0 - a - - 0 Grade. % fl - B - - D Plc Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 HeavyVeh?cies, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 MAvrnl Flow 14 73 1241 4 63 1370 Major"Oa tvlinorl Majw Majol Conllicting Flovu AJI 2739 B 0 1241 0 Stage 1 1243 - - - - - Stage 2 1496 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.47 - - 4.16 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.47 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.47 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 - - ?-.272 Poo Cap -1 Maneuver 21 a - - 541 - Stage 1 2H 0 - - Slage 2 199 0 _ _ - Platoon bluGied,'k - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 19 - - - 541 - ttrlav Cop -2 Maneuvar 19 - - - - Stage 1 266 Slage 2 176 . Appfoach Vffi Nle SB HGM Control Delay, s$ 404,6 0 0.5 HCM LOS F Mhor Corm major MMlvmt Nf NBRWBLAlWBLA2 SBL SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 19 - 541 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - - 0.71 - 0.11E - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 400.6 0 12.5 - HCtwf Lane LDS - IF A $ - HCM 95th %file Q(veh) - - 2.1 - D.4 - Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Afl major value ira platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Tin7ir(1,b 2029 PM W :n: Rc Lite} I' & Puapuaarlui St 1 12;2021 ---W f- *--- t -01 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT• SEIR Lane Configuratians + r I t r V + + r Traffic Volume (vph) 199 23 115 53 23 104 105 692 61 142 1095 140 Future Volume (vph) 199 23 116 53 23 104 105 8B2 61 142 1098 100 Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm pm+p# NA Farm pm+p1 NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 8 $ 8 5 2 2 1 n 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimus Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 56.5 56.5 11.4 58,0 58.0 Total SPI rt(%) 25.0% 25. 25.0% 25.0% 25.0° 25.0% 10.6114 62.8°7n 62.8% 12.2% 64.4% 64.4% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1e0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 D.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse None None None None Nor Max Max None Max Max ktEflutGreen (s) 16.8 16.6 16.E 1£r.8 16.6 16.6 57,1 52.1 52.1 59.9 53.5 53.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.64 0.59 0.59 0.68 0.60 D.60 vie Ratio 0,84 0.07 0.32 0.21 4,07 0.29 0.62 0.84 0.07 4.56 1.01 0.11 Central Delay 62.6 30.0 8.3 32.6 30.0 8.6 27.3 24.2 2.G 14.9 48.2 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 D,U 4.0 0.0 D.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.6 30.0 8.3 32,6 30.0 8.5 27.3 24.2 2,0 14.8 46,2 2,2 LOS E C A C C A C. C A B D A App, cauh Letay 41.7 18,s 23,2 41.1 Approach LOS 1) H C D Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 88.6 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Ratio-. 1,01 Inteiseclian Signal Delay: 33.4 Intersectlan LOIS: C Inter tion Capacity U61 izatior 9.^.5 +7 ICU Level of SeNce F Analysis Period (min) 15 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Srtn-ima{y 2029 PM VV 5; Route 11 & Puapuaanui St 11!12.202'I --*� -+-• I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR 1VBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t iif t I + �' � + r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 199 13 116 53 23 104 145 B82 61 142 1098 100 Future Volume {vehih) 199 23 116 53 23 144 105 882 61 142 1098 100 Initial Q (02b), veal 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.06 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 1$74 1626 1870 1855 1841 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 216 25 0 55 25 0 114 909 0 146 1132 Ci Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.+92 0.92 0.97 0,92 0,07 0.92 0.97 0,97 0.97 0,97 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, °!c 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 ? 4 2 2 2 Gap,vehi11 326 354 326 350 178 1122 318 1135 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.19 •0.00 0.95 0.50 100 Q.06 0.61 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 13W 1870 1585 1386 3870 1547 1781 1856 1560 1751 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vef fh 216 25 G 55 25 0 11.4 909 0 146 1132 0 Grp Sat F1cvv(s),veh!hiln 1386 1870 1585 1386 18701 1547 1781 1856 1560 1781 1870 1555 0 Serves -s), s 13.4 1.0 D.G 3.0 1.0 0.0 2.1 33.5 OR 2.7 53.2 0,4 Cycle fD dear(g_c), 5 14.4 1.0 0.0 4.0 1,0 0.0 2.1 33.5 0.0 2,7 53.2 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.40 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh h 326 850 326 350 176 1122 318 1135 VIC Ratio(X) 0.66 0.07 0.17 0.07 0.64 0.81 0.46 1.00 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 349 382 349 382 184 1122 351 1135 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,G0 1,00 1.00 1.110 1.40 1.00 1,04 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 13.@0 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 35.5 29.5 0.0 31.2 29.5 0.0 21.6 13.5 f7,0 13.9 17.3 0.0 her Delay (d2). siveh 4.3 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.0 6.9 6.4 0,0 1.0 26.2 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.01 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfOftD(54°l9),vehfln 4.8 0.4 0.0 1.0 0.4 0.4 1.7 14.1 0.0 1.3 27.7 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 39.7 29.6 0.0 31.4 29.6 0.0 28.5 19,9 0.0 14.9 43.5 0.0 LnGrp L05 D C C C B B D Approauh Vol, veb!h 241 A 80 A 1023 A 1278 A Approach Delay, s,veh 38.7 30.9 40.2. Approach LCIS D C C D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.4 57.8 21.0 9.2 58.0 21.01 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.5 520 18.0 5.0 53.5 1$.0 Max Q Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 4.7 35.5 16,4 44.1 55.2 6.0 Green Ext Tome (p ), s 0,1 6.6 0.1 0,0 0.4 0.1 Intersection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 342 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of tkle approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 HCM 6th TWSC 2029 PM 1N 6: Route 11 & Kuakini Strut 1111212621 Intersection lit Fl yY s.veh l.6 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions HCM 95th %file 0(veh) r t + r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 0 325 341 1056 1168 0 Future Vol, vehih 0 325 341 1056 1163 0 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 6 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - 'yeeid Storage Length 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Malian Stmager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclar 98 96 98 98 98 98 Heavy Veh?cies, % 5 2 2 3 2 6 MAvint Flow 0 332 348 1078 1192 0 Majcrf#Jt a Miriam Majcr1 majol Conflicting Flovu AJI 2966 112 0 G Stage 1 1192 - - - - - Stage 2 1774 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.48 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5,48 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5,48 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 2.218 - Pol CW1 Mammar 15 0 586 - - Stage 1 22t 0 - - Slage 2 144 0 - Platoon bluG�ed, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 5 - 586 - - - tJlav Cup -2 Maneuvar fi - Stage 1 114 Stage 2 144 Approach m N13 SB HCM Control Delay, s 4.8 G HCM LOS A mhor UrWi41aior M vmt NBL NBT EBLr11 EBLn SST SBR Capacity (veWh) 586- HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,554 - - - - MGM Control Delay (s) 99.7 - 0 0 HGNI Lane LDS C - A A - HCM 95th %file 0(veh) 3.9 - - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tinilr-gs 2029 PVI (; Rc Lite} 1 & -�ko Strr ! 1L kc� S`r et 1 12:7721 '',, --*, ' Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N13L NST NBR SOL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians I 1� 1~4 + r + Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 50 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Future Volume (vph) 152 30 fig 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pt NA Perm pryvt PSA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 5 $ 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 S 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (8) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22.5 9,5 87.0 87.0 16.0 05.5 95.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 15.D% 15.0% 15.0% 6.30 56.0% 58.0% 12.D% 63.7% 63.7°70 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead,tag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None Bare Nene None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 16.5 16.5 15.9 15.9 87.6 82.6 82.6 1610.7 93.2 93.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0,11 0.6D 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.64 0.64 vie Ratio 0.81 0.36 0.38 0,92 0,35 0.98 0.07 1A0 0.94 0.19 Control Delay 93.5 35.1 66,8 62.0 19,8 56.0 0.6 104.5 41.8 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 93.5 35.1 661.8 62,0 19.8 56.0 0.6 104.5 41.8 5.5 LOS F D E E ® E A F L) A App, cauh Leiay 73,7 63,0 51.4 45.7 Appreaah LOS E E D 1) Intersection Summa C+Qle Leoplh. 150 Actualeo Cycle Length; 146.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type; ,actuated-Unaaxdinated Nlaximum 0c Rato: Intersection Signal Nlay; 51.7 Intersection LOS D IntersDdon Capacity Utilization 102,7% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: }7: Route 11 & Laka Street 1ako Street 4 02 04 00 0 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Srtn-ima{y 2029 PM VV T; Route 11 & Lake Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL UYBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 981 64 202 10170 190 Future Volume ;vehih) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 98f 64 202 1070 190 Initial Q (02b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1-00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.!}0 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Dat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 11326 1626 1855 1856 1870 1656 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 4 72 42 0 39 1422 0 210 1115 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0. 6 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 i 5 5 3 ? 2 3 2 2 Gap, vehlh 184 196 99 102 204 1206 273 1266 Arrive On Green 9.10 0.10 C1.00 0.06 CaOC 0.110 0.03 0.55 {r.00 0Ab 0.58 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 0 39 1022 0 210 1115 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 11.9 2.13 D.G 5.3 3.0 4.0 1.0 57.7 U-0 5.2 64.1 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 11.9 2.0 0.0 5.3 3.0 0.0 1.0 57.7 0,0 5.2 64,11 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 UO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 184 196 99 102 204 12D6 273 12H VJC Ratio(X) 0.86 0,16 0.73 0.41 0,19 0.85 0.77 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 235 250 239 2:45 220 1206 352 126 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.0{1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.00 0.001 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.On Uniform Delay (d), slueh 59.2 54,7 0.0 62-5 61.4 0.0 21.8 18.3 U 26.9 17.4 0,0 her Delay (d2). slveh 21.6 0.4 0.0 $.7 2.7 0.0 0.4 7.5 0,0 7.6 9.0 6.0 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehfln 6.4 1,0 0.0 2.7 1.5 0.4 0.6 25.7 0.0 5.1 28.5 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 80.13 55.1 0.0 72.7 64.0 0.0 22.3 26.8 0.0 34A 261.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS F E E E C C C Apprcauh Vol, vett h 189 A 114 A 1U11 A 1325 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 76.6 69.2 25.? 27.6 Approach LOS E E C C Timer -Assigned Phs :� 2 4 5 B B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.0 91.9 18.8 8.3 95.5 12.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 13.5 82.5 18.0 5.0 91.0 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 7.2 59.7 13,9 3.0 58.1 7.3 Green Ext Tome (p), s 0.3 9.3 0,2 0.0 11:3 0.2 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 341 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Tinlir4l,b 2029 PM 8. Rc�lte} 1` Cr>I�v >Ilr�ll�a III Road 1 i :1212021 Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: 6, Houle 11 & KarnenaMeha ill KoaU as Vas i� 7 1 t ;gid 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 -- 1 t Large Group EBT EER WBT N'BL NBT 5BL 54aT_ _ Lane CDnfiguratians 4 r +14 1 1 +1� Traffic Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 638 19 532 Future Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 638 10 6112 Turn Type NA Perm NA Eget NA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 11 3 8 7 4 Permibd Phases 2 Qetectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5,0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5,0 5,0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 95 23.8 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30,5 30.5 30,G 11.8 45,0 9,5 42.7 Total SPI €t(%) 26.5% 26.5° 26.1% 10.3% 39.1° 8.39 37.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{1 110 1.0 1.0 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag € a nlze? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse None Norge Max None Max Act Eftct Green (s) 24.0 .24.0 6.8 7,1 45.1 5.1 39.6 Actuated grC Ratio 0.27 4.27 0.G8 0,08 0,51 0,00 0.45 vie Ratio 0.78 0.11 0.27 0,48 0,73 0.20 0.65 Contras Delay 44,4 1.7 29.6 54.5 .26,4 48.9 22,1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,4 D.0 010 0.0 0.0 Total Dolay 44,4 1.7 29.5 54,5 25.4 48,9 22,1 LOS D A C D C D C App, cauh De!ay 38.9 29,8 28,9 22,5 Apprc,ach LOS D C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 88.4 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum We Rano: 0.78 Inteiseclion Signal Delay; 28.0 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 76,9°A ICU Level of 5eNce D Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: 6, Houle 11 & KarnenaMeha ill KoaU as Vas i� 7 1 t ;gid 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 FIC;Pr1 6:11 Sir;rtalizod Ir-tt�rsoctiori Surilnia-y 2029 PK/I VV 8; ROUte 1 Ill Road 1 ` If 7721 I'4layament EBL > EBR 1NBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Sgt Lane Configurations r :k T. Traffic Volume (vehfh) 343 11 52 7 11 21 64 53B 11 19 6132 322 Future Volume ;vehih) .343 11 52 7 11 21 64 639 11 19 632 322 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.G0 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1, l}0 1.0U 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 $at Row,veh1hin 1855 1767 1B11 1870 1870 1870 1856 1856 1870 1870 1870 1M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 361 12 tr 7 12 22 67 672 12 20 H5 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 8,95 0.95 0,95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 9 5 2 2 2 3 ? 2 2 2 2 Cep, vehlh 408 14 11 18 33 86 863 16 39 1600 Arrive On Gruen 0.35 0.25 (1.00 0.04 0,{)4 •0.04 0.05 0.48 0.48 0.02 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1631 54 1535 289 495 908 1767 1817 32 1751 3647 0 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 373 0 Pr 41 0 D 67 t0 684 20 665 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1685 0 1535 1692 4 0 1767 0 1850 1781 1777 0 0 Servets-s), s 18.0 Q_0 O.Q 2.0 0-0 0.0 12 0.0 25.9 0-9 10.7 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 18.0 0.0 H 2.0 10 0.0 3.2 0.0 26,9 0-9 10,7 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.01 0.17 0.54 1.00 0.02 1.00 O.Do Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 422 0 fit 0 0 86 0 865 39 1640 VJC Ratio(X) 028 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0,78 0.00 0.77 0-51 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 517 0 510 0 0 152 0 885 105 1606 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.01 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lr.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 30.6 0.0 (1_0 40.3 0.0 0.0 39.8 0.0 18.3 40.9 15,E 0.0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 14.4 0.0 0,0 11.5 0.0 0.0 14A 0.4 6.5 9.7 0.8 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0_0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehrfln 8.7 0.0 0,0 1.0 0,0 0.0 1.6 0,0 11.0 0-5 4.4 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 44.9 0.0 0.0 51.8 0.0 0.0 53,8 0.4 24.8 50.6 16.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A D A A D A C D B Appfcauh Vol, veil h 373 A 41 751 686 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 44.9 51.8 27.4 17.4 Approach LOS D D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.7 8.6 42.8 7.6 6,4 45.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4-5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 7.3 38,2 25.5 5.0 4+0.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (9-c+1 1). s 20,0 5.2 12,7 4.0 2,3 27.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 1.2 0.0 4.3 0.1 4.0 3.4 fntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 27,B HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is exciudL4d from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 9: Route, 1' & Rayed Vistab 1 ` 12 2 K2l Irtiter.�ocliort In movement AIBL WBR. NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonfgurations MCM Control Delay (s) r t r HCtwf Lane LDS t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 12 68 1056 74 79 1151 Future Vol, vehlh 12 68 1056 74 79 1151 ConiticOng Peds, Or 4 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Langih fl 0 - 540 500 - Veh in Median Starager # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 Peaak Hour Faclor 92 92 92 52 92 92 Heavy Veh?cies, % 7 2 2 2 2 2 PAvint Flow 13 74 1148 60 86 1251 Major"Oa Minorl Majw Maio, Conflicting Fluvu PJI 2,971 1148 0 0 1228 0 Stage 1 1148 - - - - - Slage 2 1423 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 J.22 - - 4.12 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 7 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.31$ - - ?-.218 Poo CW 1 Maneuver 29 242 - - 568 - Stage 1 302 Slage 2 222 - Platoon blocied, ''k - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver 25 242- tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 25 Slage 1 307 - - - - - Slage 2 188 . . Approach wa N6 so HGM Control Delay, s 60.5 0 0.8 HCM LOS F Mhor Lorin major vvmt Nf N8RW8Ln1WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veWh) - W 25 242 568 - HGM Lane V.'C Raba - 0.522 0.305 0.151 - MCM Control Delay (s) - - 254.4 26.3 12.5 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F D B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1.6 1.2 0.5 - 5.44 pm Baseline Synchro 14 Report Page 19 Tin7ir(l,b 2029 AM W Frotocted Rt Lite} 1 & �C.iak ri, Strout 1;,12:7721 Large Group EBR NBL NBT SET 8BR Lane Configuratians e ' f t r Traffic Volume (vph) 159 605 968 972 2 Future Volume (vph) 159 605 968 972 2 Turn Type Perm Prat NA NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitlad Phases 4 6 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0' 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 22,5 Total Split (s) 22.5 50,0 127.5 77.5 77.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 33.3°/3 85.0% 51.7% 51.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 110 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,6 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yat Ides Recall Mode Nene Bare Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 5.5 45.5 123.0 73.0 73.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0. CX 0.33 D.89 0.53 0.53 rile Ratio 0.34 1.11 U4 1.09 HO Control Delay 1.9 114.6 19 87.9 10.5 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 4,4 0 10 0,0 Total Delay 1.9 114.6 3.a 87.9 11)_5 LOS A F A F E App, cauh Letay 16.5 87.7 Approach LOS D F Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuale�! Cycle Length. 137.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Ty:ae: Semi Act-Uncoord I'viaximum vlc Ratio: 1.11 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay: 58.7 Intersection LOS. E Intemdon Capacity Utilization 92,21, ILLI Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street 01 t06 04 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Inttorsection SUmma{y 2029 AM w Protected 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakim Strnot 11112f2021 ECRL EER NBL NBT SBT SRR Lane Configurations 2 i", 5 t t e Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 159 6(:5 966 972 2 Future Volume ;vehih) 0 150 605 968 972 2 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1-00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No 04 Dat Row, veh1hin 1870 1841 1670 1026 1$2b 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 651 1041 1045 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0-n 0.93 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 5 5 7 Cep, vehlh 1 636 1761 1945 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.36 0,66 0,57 -1.110 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1560 1761 15216 1826 1522 Grp Volume(v . vehfh 0 0 651 1041 1045 0 Grp Bat P1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1560 1731 1526 1826 1522 Q Serves -s), s 0.0 0-0 45.F d 0 72-9 0.0 Cycle 0 Clear(g_cj, s 0.0 0,0 45,5 6.0 72A 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, veh h 1 6.36 1761 1045 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 1.f}2 0.59 1.00 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 636 1761 1045 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 U10 1.00 10 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 41.0 0.2 27.2 0.0 Inc= Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 4.0 42.0 1.5 27.7 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 27.1 0.7 38.0 0,0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Belay{d),siveh 0.0 0.0 83.4 1.6 55.4 0,0 LnGrp LOS A F A D Appfoauh Vol, vett h 0 A 1692 1045 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 32,9 51.0 Approach LOS C D Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 50.0 77.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 923.0 1$.0 45.5 73.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+11), s S.4 0,6 •17.5 74.9 Green Ext -roma (pc), s 1&3- 0.0 0.0 0,0 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 41.3 HCl`A 6th LOS U N otes Unsignaiized De:,6y fn? [EBR SBRI is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2029 AM VV Pe:rrliissive 0. ROLL te} 1 & �C.iak ri, StruGt 1;,12:7721 Large Group EBR NBL NBT SET 8BR Lane Configuratians if '� f t r Traffic Volume (vph) 159 605 968 972 2 Future Volume (vphj 159 605 968 972 2 Turn Type Perm Perm NA NA Perm Protecled Phases 2 6 Permitlad Phases 4 2 6 Qetectad Phase 4 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 22,5 Total Split (s) 22,5 127.5 127,5 127,5 127.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 85.D% 85.0% 85.0% 85.E Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Recall Mode None Max Max Max flax Act Effct Careen (s) 6.5 123.0 123.0 123.0 123.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0,05 0.69 D39 0.89 0.69 vie Ratio 0,64 1.58 0.55 0.65 0,00 Control Delay 14.8 289.4 4.4 4A 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 Do 0.0 Total Df�12y 14,8 259.4 4,4 4.4 1.0 LOS B F A A A App, cauh Letay 114.1 4.4 Approach LOS 1= A Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Atuate�! Cycle Length. 138.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum 0c Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 68.8 Intersection LOS. E Intemdon Capacity Utilization 92.21, ILLI Level of Service F Analysis Period [min) 15 5.00 pm Baselire Synchre 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Inttorsection SUmma{y 2029 AM W Permissive 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakim Strout 11112!2021 EBL EER NBL NBT SBT SRR Lane Configurations i", t t e Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 159 6(:5 966 972 2 Future Volume ;vehih) 0 150 605 968 972 2 Initial Q (0b), vets 0 0 i} 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1841 1670 1826 i82b 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 651 1041 1045 0 Peak Hour Factor €,1.93 0.93 0.n 0.93 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 £ 2 5 5 7 Cep, vehlh 1 552 1761 1741 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 {1.96 0,96 0,96 -7.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1560 540 1826 3826 1522 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 651 1041 1045 0 Grp Bat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1560 540 1826 1826 1522 0 Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 117.0 6.0 6.0 0.0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, s 0.0 0.0 123.0 S.0 6.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, veWh 1 552 1761 1761 WC Ratio(X) 4.00 1.1B 159 0.59 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 552 1761 1761 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.x 1.00 10 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 4.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 96.5 1.5 1.5 0.4 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 33,0 0,7 0.7 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 109.7 1.B 1.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS A F A A Appfoauh Vol, veb!h 0 A 1692 1W A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 43.2 1.7 Approach LOS V A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 127.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 18.0 123.4 Max Q Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 125.0 U.0 &0 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 0.0 4.0 13.4 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 27.4 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tiriilr. b 2029 'AM W Pr0tPeFrrm 6. RoLr te} 1 & �\'uak n Strutt 1;,12:7721 -)r Large Group EBR NBL NBT SET 8BR Lane Configuratians e ' Traffic Volume (vph) 159 605 968 972 2 Future Volume (vph) 159 605 968 972 2 Turn Type Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitlad Phases 4 2 6 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 E Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0' 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 40.0 127.5 81,5 81.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 30.7"1 85.0'/L 54.3% 54.3" Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 110 1,0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 15.0 0.a 0.0 Q.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yat Yes Recall Mode None None Max PAax Max Act Effct Green (s) 5.5 123.0 123.0 77.0 77.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.04 4.89 0.89 0.56 0.56 vie Raba 0.36 1.11 U4 1.03 HO Control Delay 2.1 108.6 3.9 67.0 9.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 D.0 0.0 Total Delay 2.1 108,6 3.9 X7.0 5.0 LOS A F A E A App, cauh Letay 44.2 66.8 Approach LOS D F Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 137.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.11 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay: 49.9 Intersection LOS. Q Intemdon Capacity Utilization 92.21, ILLI Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street //-�� 0L V Is 011 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Irttorsection SUmma{y 2029 AM W ProtPerm 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakim Strout 11112f2021 ECRL EER NBL NBT SBT SRR Lane Configurations 2 i", 5 t t e Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 159 6(:5 966 972 2 Future Volume ;wehih) 0 159 605 968 972 2 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.90 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1841 1670 1626 1$2b 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 651 1041 1045 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.n 0.93 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 5 5 7 Cep, vehlh 1 672 1761 1116 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.32 0,66 0,61 •0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1560 1761 1826 1826 1522 Grp Volume(v . vehfh 0 0 651 1041 1045 0 Grp Bat P1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1560 1781 1826 1826 1522 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 38.2 6.0 66.3 0.0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, s 0.0 0,0 38.2 U 66.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1X 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, veh h 1 672 1761 1116 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 0.97 0,59 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 6135 1761 1116 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 38.0 0.2 22.5 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 26.4 1.5 15.4 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 °dile Bacir=(501/9),vehfln U 0.0 24.6 0,7 31.4 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 64.4 1.6 37.9 0,0 LnGrp LOS A E A D Appfoauh Vol, vett h 0 A 1692 1045 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 25.8 37.9 Approach LOS C D Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 10 45.1 82A Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 923.0 1$.0 41.5 77.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+11), s U 0,6 40.2 68.3 Green Ext Tome f p c), s 13.3' 0.0 Q;4 5.2. tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 30.4 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBRI is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Baso ;;°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tiriilr. b 2029 PM 'W Frr)te:cted Rt rete} 1 & �\'uak rte Street1 i : 12,2 021 Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases, 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street Qc 05 � 06 04 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 1 I t Large Group EBR N13L NBT SET' Lane Configurations if V t t Traffic Volume (vph) 325 341 1056 116x8 Future Volume (vph) 325 341 1056 1165 Turn Type Perm Prat NA NA Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permibd Phases 4 Qetectof Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,l' 5,0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 32,0 127.5 95,5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0°la 21.3°1'3 85.0% 63.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 All -fled Tirne (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{1 160 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.7 27.5 123.1 91.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.07 0.19 D.87 0.64 vie Ratio 0.83 1.01 t1.57 1.00 Control Delay 26.2 10?.9 6.1 50,9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.0 Total Df:lay 26,2 107.9 5.1 5419 LOS C F A Apprcauh De!ay 31.D W,9 Approach LOS C Intersection Summary C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 141.8 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum vlc Ratio:1.01 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 38.5 Intersection LOS. Q Intersection Capacity U61ization 89.1% ILLI Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases, 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street Qc 05 � 06 04 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Surnmary 2029 PM W Protected 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11112f2021 EBL EER NBL NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations I r 5 t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 325 341 1056 1168 0 Future Volume ;vehlh) 0 325 341 1056 1168 0 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.N 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1781 1870 1870 1856 1$70 1811 Adj Eloy Rate,. vehlh 0 0 348 1078 1192 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.45 0.98 0.38 0.98 0,08 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 372 1790 1348 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 {1.21 0,46 0,72 •0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 1751 1856 3870 1535 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 348 1078 1192 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1607 1585 1781 156 1876 1535 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 24.5 6.2 G2.6 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 24.5 6.2 62,6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.b4 1.00 Lade Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 1 372 1790 1348 VJC Ratio(X) 0.00 U4 0.60 0.88 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 384 1790 1348 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.x 1.00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 49.6 0.2 13.7 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 4.0 29.6 1.5 8.7 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(501/9),vehfln U 0.0 U9 0.8 26.E 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 79.2 1.7 22.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS A E A C Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1426 1192 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 20,8 22.5 Approach LOS C C Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 31.1 96.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 18.0 27.5 91.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 8.2 0.0 26.5 64.6 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 14.5 0.0 0.1 13.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 21.5 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2029 PM VV Pe:rriiissive 0. ROLL te} 1 �C.iak rte Street 1 12,2 021 Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baselire Synchro 10 Report Page 1 I t Large Group EBR N13L NBT SET' Lane Configuratians r I f t Traffic Volume (vph) 325 341 1056 1168 Future Volume (vph) 325 341 1056 1165 Turn Type Perm Perrin NA NA Protecled Phases 2 6 Permibd Phases 4 2 D9tectad Phase 4 2 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 Total Split (s) 22.5 127.5 127,5 127,5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 85.D% B5.0% 85.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Recall Mode None Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 123.0 123.0 125.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 0.82 D. B2 U2 vie Ratio 1.00 1.50 0.71 0.78 Control Delay 53.2 265.6 9.1 11,3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 D.0 Total Delay 83.2 265.6 9,1 11,3 LOS F F A B App, cauh Letay 71.7 113 Appreaah LOS E S Intersection Summery C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 150 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Unroord Maximum 0c Rat 1.50 Inteisectlan Signal Delay. 48.6 Intersection LOS. Q Inter eon C. achy Utilizalion 89.1% ILLI Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baselire Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2029 PM W Permissive 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11112!2421 EBL EER NBL NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations I r t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 325 341 1056 1160 0 Future Volume ;wehlh) 0 325 341 1056 1168 0 Initial Q (0b), veal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.N HCl`A 6th LOS 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1781 1870 1870 1856 1870 1811 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 348 1078 1192 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.38 0.98 0,08 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 480 1790 1804 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 (06 0.96 0.96 -7.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 4T0 1856 3870 1535 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 348 1078 1192 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1697 1585 470 18,56 1876 1535 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 35.F 6.2 7.9 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 0.0 0,0 43.4 6.2 7,9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 1 460 1790 1804 VJC Ratio(X) 0.00 0.72 0.60 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 450 1790 1604 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 10 1.170 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.40 1.04 1.00 1.40 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 2.3 0.2 0.2 0.0 Mor Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 U 1.5 1.9 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 u.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 2.0 4.8 1.4 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 11.5 1.7 2.1 0.4 LnGrp LOS A B A A Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1426 1192 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 4.1 z.1 Approach LOS A A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 127.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 923.0 18.0 123.4 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 45.4 0,0 9.9 Green Ext Tome f p c), s 28.2. 4.0 19.4 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 3.2 HCl`A 6th LOS A N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir4l,b 2020 PM W ProtPerm 0. ROLL tc 1 & �C.iakiri� Street 1 i : 12,2 021 Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases, 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street 1 1 /� L+4 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 I t Large Gree EBR N13L NBT S. Lane Configuratians e ' f t Traffic Volume (vph) 325 341 1956 1165 Future Volume (vph) 325 341 1056 11E8 Turn Type Perm pm+pt NA NA Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 ED 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.6 25.4 127.4 99,0 Total SPI rt(%) 15.1% 48.90/'3 84.9O/L 66.0° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Gptrnize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 10.7 123.1 123.1 9U Actuated grO Ratio 0.07 0.86 D.86 0.66 vie Ratio OZ6 1.00 0.68 0,97 Control Delay 32.2 94.9 6.6 42.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 6.0 Total Df:lay 32,2 34.9 6,6 42,3 LOS C F A 0 App, cauh Delay 28.1 42,3 Approach LOS C D Intersection Summery C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 142.8 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Acl-Unroord Maximum Oc Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Delay. 34.3 Intersectlan LOS: C Intersection Capacity Ulilizati€rn 89.1% ILLI Level of 5eNce E Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases, 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street 1 1 /� L+4 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2029 PM W ProtPerm 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11112f2021 EBL EER NBL NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations I r 5 t t r TraffrcVolurne (vehfh) 0 325 341 1056 1168 0 Future Volume ;vehlh) 0 325 341 1056 1168 0 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.N 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1781 1870 1870 1856 1870 1811 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 348 1078 1192 0 Peak Hour Factor €,11.98 0.98 0.38 0.98 0,08 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 454 1790 1665 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.04 0,66 0,89 •0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 1781 1856 1870 1595 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 348 1078 1192 0 Grp Bat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1697 1585 1781 1856 1870 1535 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 1.7 6.2 24.G 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 0.0 O'D 1,7 6,2 24.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.G0 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 1 454 1790 1665 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 0.77 0.60 0.72 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 241 718 1790 1665 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.170 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.2 2.1 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 4.0 2.7 1.5 2.7 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 u.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 6.4 0.8 4.5 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 13.7 1.7 4.8 17.0 LnGrp LOS A B A A Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1426 1192 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 4.6 4.8 Approach LOS A A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.4 0.0 9.5 117.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 122.9 118.1 23.9 94.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 8.2 0,0 3.7 26.6 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 14.5 0.0 1.0 18.5 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 4,7 HCl`A 6th LOS A N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2029 AM W Frotocted (; Rc rete} 1 -�ko Strr ! lL kc� S€r t 1 12:7721 '',, --*, ' *.-- ! Large Group EBL EBT WBL 'WUBT NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1� T4 ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 976 55 184 822 146 Future Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 976 55 164 822 146 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA Ism -pl NA Perm pm#pt GSA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 7 4 3 a 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 26.0 25.5 22.5 23.0 9,5 79.0 79.0 12A 81,5 81.5 Total SPI rt(%) 113.6"•0 18.90/'3 16.1% 16.4% 6.8% 56.4% 56A% 8.6% 55.2% 58.2° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{3 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norge None None None Max Max None Max Max Aot Eftct Green (s) 21.5 27.5 12.5 18.5 79.5 74.5 74.5 84.9 78.9 78.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.15 0.20 019 0.13 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.61 0,56 0.56 vie Raba 1.11 0.34 0.58 1.13 0.20 1.05 0.07 1.23 0.84 0.16 Control Delay 140.7 34.9 75.1 122,0 131.4 74,2 1.6 181.3 35.1 5.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 010 0.0 0.13 O.0 O.O 0,0 Total aolay 140.7 34.9 75.1 122,6 13.4 74,2 1.6 181,3 35.1 5.4 LOS F C E F B E A F D A App, cauh Delay 109.8 113.2 .58.6 52.4 Approach LOS l= F E l) Intersection Summa Cycle Lengths 140 Actuated Cyde Length; 140 Natural Cyde: 140 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Rata: 1.23 Inteisecllan Signal Celay: 74.3 Intersectlon LOS E Intertian Capacity Utilization 112,1% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7, Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street 01 I oz -OD4 05 � 06 07 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection SUn-ima{y 2029 AM VV Protected T; Route 11 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I -� *� `► ,� I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT Vdl3R, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t r t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 D76 55 164 822 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 283 46 69 85 39 305 33 976 55 164 822 146 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.04 1.00 1.010 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.130 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1570 1856 3870 1870 1810 1870 1441 1811 1856 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1438 0 174 8874 0 Peak Hour Factor 4.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0,94 4.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Cep, vehlh 302 272 118 90 283 10K 196 1147 Arrive On Green 9.17 0.15 {1.00 4,07 0.04 0.110 0.43 0.59 U OC 0.06 0.62 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 15610 1725 1856 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vef fh 301 51 G 90 41 0 35 10H 0 174 874 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 18'5& 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 21.4 3.0 0.0 6.4 2.7 4.0 1.0 65.4 0.0 5J 43.2 0,4 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, s 21.4 3.0 0.0 8.4 2,7 0.0 1.0 55.4 4.17 5.7 43.2 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 O.DD 1.04 0.00 1.00 1,40 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veA 307 272 918 80 283 1098 196 1147 VJC Ratio(X) 1.00 0.19 0.76 0.51 0,12 0.95 0.89 0.76 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 302 824 251 273 343 1098 196 1147 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,0{1 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,04 1.07 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.90 0.04 1.00 1.04 4.011 1.00 1.00 13.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 5.2.7 47.8 0.0 58.2 59.4 0.0 16.0 24.3 0,0 32.7 17,5 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 51.2 0.3 0.0 $.7 4.9 0.0 0.2 16.9 0.0 34.9 4.8 0.6 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 9.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacic=(54°l9),vehfln 13.9 1.S 0.0 3.2 1.4 U DA 32.4 0.0 5.1 19.81 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 103.9 48.0 0.0 67.9 64.4 0.0 16.21 41.2 0.0 57.7 22.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D E E B D E C Appfeauh Vol, veli h 352 A 131 A 1073 A 10 A Approach Delay, s�ve}, 15.5 66.8 40.4 29.9 Approach LOS F E D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.0 79.0 13.0 23.0 8.0 83.0 26.0 10.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s T5 74.5 1&0 220 5.0 77.0 21.5 18.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 7.7 87.4 8.4 5,0 3.0 45.2 23.4 4.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 4.3 0.1 0.1 0:0 8.1 0.0 0.1 tntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay O'D HChA 6th LOS D N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7irtl,b 2029 AM VV Pr:rniissive (; ROLL te} 1 & -�iko'Strr t lL&ko S€raet 1 IE:772I '',, --*, ' *.-- t ! Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1 T4 ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 976 55 184 822 146 Future Volume ,vphj 283 46 85 39 33 976 55 164 822 146 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA I7m+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 a 5 2 1 6 Permitbad Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Qetectcx Phase 4 4 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22,5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 61.0 51.0 51.0 X1.0 9,5 76.0 76.0 130 79,5 75.5 Total SPI ft (%) 40.7% 40.7% 4G1% 40.7% 6.3% 50.7% 50.7% 8.7% 53.0% 53.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead,tag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Nare Ncne None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 56.5 56.5 56.5 58.5 76.5 71.5 71.5 83. F 78:9 76.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.51 0.48 0.48 0.56 0.51 0.51 vie Raba 1.21 0.18 0.20 0.54 0.33 1.17 4.08 1.22 0.92 0.18 Control Delay 165.1 17.9 511 26.5 23.2 124,1 8.3 177.4 54.7 8.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 0.0 01.0 0.G 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 165.7 17.9 33.1 2f.5 23,2 124.1 8.3 177.4 59.7 8_8 LOS F 8 C C C F A F b A App, cauh Letay 122.6 27.8 115,0 63.6 Approach LOS F C F E Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Atuale�! Cyde Length. 150 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi AcWnroord Nlaximum vlc Ratlo:1.22 Inteisectlan Signal belay: 94.4 Intersectlan LOIS F Inter eon Capacity Utilizaton 112.1' ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street a 1 1 1 oz I - !" T1s 0= 5:00 pm baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intc--rsoction SUmmarn y 2029 AM VV Permissive T; Route 11 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I -� *� `► ,� I'4layament EBS. EBT M '411BL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t r t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 076 55 164 822 146 Future Volume ;wehih) 283 46 69 85 39 305 33 976 55 164 822 146 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1_CI0 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.130 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,130 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1856 3870 1870 1870 1870 1441 1611 1856 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1438 0 174 8874 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 p.94 0,94 0.94 :0,94 D.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap, vehlh 385 481 374 491 271 1052 189 1127 Arrive On Green 0.26 1126 0.1111 0,26 0,26 0.110 0.03 0.57 100 Q.07 0.61 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1364 1870 0 1341 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856: 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 0 35 1038 0 174 874 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1364 1870 0 1341 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 1585 Ct Serve{s_s), s 27.1 2.6 D.G 6,9 2.1 0.0 1.4 67.8 0.0 7.3 44,0 O,Q Cycle 01 Gear(g_cj, 5 292 2.6 H 9.5 2,1 0.0 1.0 67.8 0.0 73 44.0 13.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 Lame Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 385 481 374 481 271 1032 189 1127 VJC Ratio(X) 0.75 0,11 D,24 0.09 0,13 0.98 0,92 01.73 Avail Cap(c_a), veh+h 547 840 631 840 292 1062 189 1127 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,0{1 1.00 1.O0 1.110 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.O0 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0. DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.O0 O.D0 1.00 1.O0 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 46.6 35.7 0.0 39.3 35.5 0.0 15.9 26.1 0.0 38.1 181 0,0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 3.5 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.2 22.6 0.0 43.4 5.2 13.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirClftD(54°l9),vehfln 9.5 1.2 0.0 2.3 1.0 0.4 0.4 35.2 0.41 5.3 Me D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 50,1 35.8 0.0 39.7 35.6 0.0 17.1 49.0 0.0 81.5 23.6 10 LnGrp LOS D D D D B D F C Appreauh Vol, veb!h 352 A 131 A 1073 A 1048 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 48.0 38.4 46.0 312 Approach LCIS D D D C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 76.0 H'9 8.0 111.0 36.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8.5 71.5 56.5 5.0 75.0 56.5 Max Q Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 9.3 139.8 31.2 3,0 4E0 11.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.2 1,2 0.0 7.8 0.5 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 41,5 HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tinilr.gb 2029 HM VV PFO POrlTi (; Route: 1 & -�IkO Strr t /Lako S€170et 1 12:772I Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians I fig T r t ' Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 976 55 154 522 146 Future Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 976 55 164 822 146 Turn Type pm+pt ISA pm -pt NA pm+pt NA Perm prn+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 ED 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# (s) 9.5 22.5 0,5 22,5 M 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 20.0 32.4 11.2 22.8 9,5 73.0 73.0 114 76,9 76.9 Total SPI it(%) 16.0°rG 24.9% 9.6% 17.5% 7.3% 56.2% 56.2% 10.3% 59.2% 59.2° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.1) 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Recall Mode None None Ncne None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 39.1 .77.9 25.0 18.3 73.5 618,5 68.5 81.5 78.2 76.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.36 0.21 0.10 0.14 0.57 0.53 0.53 0.63 0.59 0,59 rrle Ratio 1.08 0.31 0.34 1.07 0.17 1,06 0.07 1.03 0.81 0.16 Control Delay 114.4 27.7 39.1 10T,2 11.4 76.3 0.1 1179.8 29,6 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 0,0 6,0 0.0 D.0 O.0 0.0 11,0 Total aolay 114.4 27.7 39,1 101,2 11,4 76.1 G,1 109,9 29,5 3.9 LOS F C a F B E A F C A App, cauh Letay 89.1 88.9 70.1 37,0 Approach LOS F F E 0 Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 134 Actuated Cycle Length; 130 Natural Cycle: 130 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum ulc Ratio: 1.08 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 63.2 Intersectlon LOS E Intersection Capacity Utilization 112,1% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street + 01 t02 7 X33 X34 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intc--rsoction SUn-ima{y 2029 AM W ProtPerm T; Route 11 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I -� *� `► ,� I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t r t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 976 55 164 822 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 283 46 69 85 39 305 33 976 55 164 822 146 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 13 0 0 4 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.0D 0,98 1.00 1_CIO 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. Do 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,130 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Dat Row, veh1hin 1470 1870 1570 1856 3870 1870 1870 1870 1441 1811 1856 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1438 0 174 8874 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 4.94 0.994 8,94 0.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Gap,vehl11 348 243 227 88 301 1122 212 1163 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.13 0.00 0.06 0.05 0.110 0.03 0.60 UOQ 0.06 O,fa3 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 18713 1560 1725 1856 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 0 35 100 0 174 874 0 Grp Sat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 14.3 2.8 Q.a 5.5 2.5 0.0 0.9 57.E U-0 4.4 38.4 0,4 Cycle 0 Gear(g_c), s 16,3 2.8 0.4 5.5 2,5 0.0 0.9 57.6 0.0 4,4 38,4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 O.DD 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 348 243 227 88 801 1122 212 1153 VJC Ratio(X) 0.86 0,21 0.40 047 0,12 0.92 0,62 0.75 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 348 452 227 2% 326 1122 249 1163 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1X 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,04 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.0 1.00 O.DD 1.00 1.40 0.00 1.00 1.00 13.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 44.6 44.9 0.0 48.8 53.8 0.0 13.8 20.7 0.0 26.7 15.2 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 19.6 0.4 0.0 1.1 3.9 0.0 D.2 14.D 0.0 16.8 4.5 0.0 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh OL 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfDftD(54°l9),vehfln 2.5 1.3 0.0 2.5 1.3 0.0 D.3 27.5 0.0 3.9 16.5 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 642 45.4 0.0 49,9 57.5 0.0 14,0 34.7 0.0 43.6 19.7 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D D E _ 8 C D B Appfoauh Vol, veb!h 352 A 131 A 1073 A 1048 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 61.1 v2.3 4.L 23.6 Approach LOS E D C C Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 73.8 11.2 19.5 7.9 78.9 20.8 9.G Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8.9 68.5 E7 27.9 5.9 72.4 16.3 18.3 Max Q Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 0,4 59.6 7.5 4.8 2.9 40.4 18,3 4.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 5.2 0.0 0.2 D:0 8.1 0.0 0.1 tnte-fsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 31.5 HChA 6th LOS C; N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tln7irtl,b 2029 AM IN 4 -Lane (; ROLL tc 1 & _�iko Strr t lL&ko S€reet 1 12:2721 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR S6L 5BT M Lane Configuratians 1 T4 ' tf r +f Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 976 55 1f64 822 146 Future Volume (vph) 283 46 85 39 33 976 55 164 822 146 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pl NA Perm pm#pt INA Fefm Protected Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 B 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (5) 23.0 23.0 22.5 22.5 9.5 33.5 33.5 11.9 35,0 35.0 Total SPI rt(%) 255.6% 25.6% 25.0% 25.0% 10.6% a72% 37.2% 12.2%a 38,9°.e 38.9TM, Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1,0 I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 too Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None None None None None Max. Max None Max Max Act Effut Careen (s) 17.3 1 T.3 15.3 15.3 34.1 29.1 29.1 38.4 .34.7 34.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.18 0.40 0.34 0.34 0.44 0.40 0.40 vie Ratio 0.85 0,31 029 0.88 0.15 0.87 0.10 0.85 0,62 0.21 Control Delay 56.B 16.8 33.5 41.4 15.8 37.3 0.3 55.0 25X 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 G,0 6.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56,8 16,8 33.1. 41,4 15.a 37.3 0.3 55.0 25.0 4,5 LOS E E C 0 E D A E C A Apprcauh De! ay 45.1 38,8 34.7 26.7 Approeoh LOS 0 0 C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 86.3 Natural Cyde: 90 Control Ty:ae: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: D_88 Inteiseclian Signal D] lay: 33.8 Intersectlan LOS: C IntersDdon Capacity U61izatiori 87.7% ILLI Level of Service E Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases; 7; Route 11 u Laka Street 1aka Street 01 t02 lroia 05 7 06 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection SUn-ima{y 2029 AM IN 4 -Lane T; Route 11 & Lake Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 tt r t+ r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 576 55 164 822 146 Future Volume ;vehih) 283 48 69 85 39 305 33 976 55 164 822 146 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.04 1.00 1_CI0 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.130 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Rove, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1856 3870 1870 1870 1870 1441 1811 1856 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1438 0 174 8874 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 4,94 4.94 p.94 4,94 0.94 X0,94 D,M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 fi 3 2 Cep, vehlh 353 370 136 144 326 1414 318 1565 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.00 9,08 0.08 OAU 0.03 0.40 D.CC 0.08 0.44 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 3554 1560 1725 3526 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 D 35 1036 a 174 874 0 Grp Bat P1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1757 1870 0 1781 1777 1560 1725 1763 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 11.9 1.6 O.G 3 6 1.5 0.0 0.8 18.2 4.0 4.2 13.4 0,4 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, 5 11.9 1.6 H 3.6 1.5 0.0 0,6 18.2. 0.0 4,2 13,4 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.0.0 1.04 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 353 370 136 144 326 1414 318 1565 VJC Ratio(X) 0.85 0.14 0.66 0.28 0,11 0.74 6,55 0.56 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 451 473 435 460 386 141 D 330 1565 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.170 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 D.00 Uniform Delay (d), c'veb 28.3 24.2 C1_0 32.8 31.8 0.0 12.8 18_$ 0.0 11.2 15,0 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 121 0.2 C1,0 5.4 1.1 0.0 0.1 3.5 ac 1.8 1.4 M In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Back=(541/9),vehlln 6,0 0.7 0.0 1.7 0.7 0.4 0.3 7.6 4.0 1.6 5.2 D:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 40A 24.3 0.0 38,2 32.9 0.0 12.9 12.3 0.0 16,0 16.5 0.0 LnGrp L05 D C D C B C B B Approauh Vol, veli h 352 A 131 A 1073 A 1048 A Approach Delay, s vph 38.0 36.5 22.L 16.4 Approach LOS D D C B Timer - Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 33.5 10.0 7.0 37.0 10.1 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.5 29.0 18.5 5.0 30.5 18.6 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 6.2 20.2 13,9 2.8 15.4 5.6 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 4.6 015 0.0 5.5 0.3 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 22.6 HChA 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(1,b 2029 PM W Protected (; Rc rete} 1 -�ko Strr ! 1L kca S`r et 1 12;2021 '',, --*, ' *.-- Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET N13L NO NW 4181. :WT W Lane CDnfiguratians I 1� '� T4 �i + r �i + Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Future Volume (vph) 152 30 fig 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Turn Type Prat NA Pkat NA pm+pt NA Perm pm4pt ISA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 $ 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectcx Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (8) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22.5 9,5 87.0 87.0 16.4 55.5 95.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 15.D% 15.0% 15.0% 6.30 56.0% 58.0% 12.D% 63.7% 63.7°70 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes: Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None Nome Max Max None hoax Max Act Effct Green (s) 16.5 .23.5 11.3 15.9 87.6 82.6 62.6 1610.7 93.2 93.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.11 0.16 a.G9 0.11 O.H 0.56 0.56 0.69 0.64 0.64 vie Ratio 0,81 0.26 0.53 0,92 0,35 0.98 0.07 1A0 0.94 0.19 Control Delay 93.5 31.1 79.3 62.0 19,8 56.0 0.6 104.5 41.8 5.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,4 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Do4ay 93.5 31.1 9.3 62,0 19,8 56.0 0.6 104.5 41.8 5.5 LOS F C E E E E A F tJ A App, cauh Letay 72.3 65.5 51.4 45.7 Approach LOS E E D 1) Intersection Summa C+Qle Leoplh. 150 Actualeo Cycle Length; 146.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type; ,actuated-Unaaxdina#ed Nlaximum, 0c Rato: Inteisectlon Signal Nlay; 51.8 Intersectlon LOS 0 Intention Capacity Utilizaaton 102,7% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street Boa I T02 1 1I"03 1--004 OJ T L -w. I 07 1 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srtn-ima{y 2029 PM VV Protected T; Route 11 & Lake Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL UYBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Future Volume ;vehih) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 98f 64 202 1070 190 Initial Q (02b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.!}0 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Dat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 11326 1626 1855 1856 1870 1656 1870 1 M Adj Flour Rate,. vehlh 158 31 4 72 42 0 39 1422 0 210 1115 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0A 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 i 5 5 3 ? 2 3 2 2 Cep. vehlh 184 164 99 70 2244 1295 291 1293 Arrive On Green 9.10 0.09 0.00 0,06 0.04 0.110 0.03 0.67 {r.00 0.05 D.69 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 3826 0 1767 18M 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 0 39 1022 0 210 1115 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 11.7 2.0 D.a 5.2 3.0 4.0 0.9 54.0 0.0 4.9 6:7,0 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 111.7 2.0 0.0 5,2 10 0.0 0.9 54.0 9,0 4.9 60.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.` o 1.010 L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 184 164 99 70 224 1235 291 1293 VJC Ratio(X) 0.86 0,18 0.73 0.60 0.17 0.83 G,72 086 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 256 244 250 240 1235 376 1293 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.0{1 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.04 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 58.0 55.7 0.0 61.2 62.3 0.0 19.5 16.4 C.0 24.1 15.6 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 20.8 0.6 0.01 0,6 8.0 0.0 0.4 6.5 0,0 4.8 7.8 0.0 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehrfln 6.2 1,0 0.4 2.6 1.5 0.0 0.6 23,5 0.0 4.6 26.0 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 78.8 56.3 0.0 74.8 70.3 0.0 10.9 22.3 0.0 28.9 23.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E E E 6 C C C Approach Vol, veb!h 189 A 114 A 1Uf;1 A 1325 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 75.1 70.E 22.7 24.2 Approach LOS E E C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 92.1 11.8 16.0 8.3 95.5 18.3 9.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 13.5 82.5 18.0 18,0 5.0 91.0 18.0 18.11 Max Q Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 6.9 56.1) 7.2 4,0 2.9 62,9 13.7 5.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.3 10.0 0.1 0.1 OX 12.1 0.2 0.1 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 29.2 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir4l,b 2029 PM W Protected (; Rc rete} 1 -�ko Strr ! 1L kc� S`r et 1 12;2721 '',, --*, ' *.-- Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET N13L NO NW 4181. :WT W Lane CDnfiguratians I 1� '� T4 �i + r �i + Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 981 64 2D2 1070 190 Future Volume (vphj 152 30 fig 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. NA pm+pt NA Perm pm4pt ISA Perm Protecled Phases 4 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 Z 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 S 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 37.0 37.0 37,0 37.0 9,5 77.2 77.2 15,a 815 63.5 Total SPI it(%) 26.5% 28.5% 28.5% 28.5% 7.30 59.49 59.4% 12.2°7 64.2% 64.270 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Trt (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 32.5 32.5 32.5 32.5 77.7 72.7 72.7 88.5 80.9 80.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.25 0.25 D.25 0.25 0,60 0.56 0.56 0.68 0.62 0.62 vie Ratio 1.03 0.18 0.22 0,54 0;32 0.99 0.07 1.41 0.96 0.19 Control Delay 129.6 18.2 40.9 19,2 15.0 54.8 1.5 100.9 43.2 4.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.D 0.0 OA Total aolay 129.5 18.2 40,9 19,2 15.0 54,8 1.5 100.9 43.2 4.1 LOS F E D B E ID A F D A App, cauh Letay 91.9 23,6 50.2 46.1 Approach LOS F C D p Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 134 Actuated Cycle Length; 130 Naturai Cy+de: 130 Control Tyne; Actuared-Unaoordinaled Maximum, ulc Rato: Inteiseclian Signal Nlay. 48,4 Intersectlon LOS 0 Inter eon Capacity Utilization 102,7% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street a1 I Toe 1 --00.4 1 4\0 4 GE 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-ima{y 2029 PM VV Protected T; Route 11 & Lake Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL UYBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Future Volume ;vehih) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 98f 64 202 1070 190 lniDal Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.a0 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 11326 1826 1855 1856 1870 1856 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 4 72 42 0 39 1422 0 210 1115 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0A 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 i 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Gap, vehlh 247 293 260 267 239 1240 306 1297 Arrive On Green 9.16 0.15 {1.00 0,15 0.16 0.110 0.03 0.67 {r.00 U6 •7.59 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1343 1870 0 1378 1826 0 1767 18M 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 0 39 1022 0 210 1115 0 Grp Sat F7ovv(s),veh!hiln 1343 1870 0 1378 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 13.1 1.6 O.G 5.4 2.3 4.0 0.8 46.4 U-0 4.2 51.5 0,4 Cycle 01 dear(g_cj, s 15.4 1.6 U 7.0 23 0.01 11.8 46.4 0,0 4.2 51.5 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.0.0 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 UO L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veA 247 293 260 287 239 1244 306 1297 VJC Ratio(X) 0.64 0.11 0,28 C, T5 0,16 0.92 0,69 01.86 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 420 534 437 521 262 1240 382 1297 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,0{1 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 48.1 41.2 0.0 44.2 41.4 0.0 16.5 14.0 U 20.3 13.3 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 27 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.3 6.3 0,0 3.7 7.6 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirtDftO(54°l9),vehfln 4.6 0.8 0.4 1,9 1.0 0.0 0.5 19.5 0.0 3.8 21.6 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 50.8 41.3 0.0 44,7 41.7 0.0 16.9 20.3 0.0 24.01 20.9 11.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D B C C C Appfcauh Vol, veb!h 189 A 114 A 1U11 A 1325 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 49.3 43.6 .1 21.3 Approach LOS D D C C Timer -Assigned Phs '1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.9 80.6 22.4 8.0 83.5 22.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 11.3 72.7 32.5 5.0 79.0 32.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 6.2 48A 17,4 2.8 53.5 9.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,3 9.6 015 0.0 11.4 0.4 fntefsection Summary HCC 5th. Ctrl Delay 23,8 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tinilr.gb 2029 PM W Protected (; Rc rete} 1 -�ko Strr ! lL kc� S`r et 1 12;2021 '',, '--W Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET NBL NBT NBR 4181. :WT W Lane CDnfiguratians 1 � T. + r li + Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Future Volume ,wphj 152 30 69 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm -pt NA pm+pt NA Perm pm4pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 B 2 2 5 6 Qetectcx Phase 7 4 u 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 ED 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split ('s) 9.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 9,5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 13,0 25.1 10,4 22,5 9,5 78.3 78.3 16.2 85,0 85_0 Total SPI int(%) 10.0% 19.37a 9.0'No 17.3% 7.3%s &0.2% 60.2}m 12.5% 655A% 65A% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Apt Eftct Green (s) 24.8 18.1 19.2 13.3 78.9 73.0 73.9 90.1 82.6 62.6 Actuated grC Ratio 0,20 0.14 0.15 0.11 0,63 0,59 0.59 0.72 0.6E 0.66 vie Ratio 0,93 0.28 0.32 0.86 0,31 0,94 0.07 0.95 0.91 0.18 Control Delay 98.4 24.6 45.1 43.3 13,8 41,7 0.1 84.3 32.4 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 85,4 24,6 45,1 43,3 13.8 41.7 0.1 84.3 32,4 3.6 LOS I" C D D 13 D A F C A Apprcauh Letay 73.4 43.7 38,2 35.8 Approach LOS P D D 0 Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 134 Actuated Cycle Length; 125.4 Naturai Cy+de: 130 Control Tyne; ,Actuated-Uncmrdinaled Nlaximum 0c Rato: 0.95 Inteisecllan Signal Delay. 40.3 Intersectlon LOS 0 Intention Capacity Utilization 102,7% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period [min) 15 and Phases, 7. Route 11 & Lake Street 1ako Street "ooa I T02 I fF 613 I -*04 1 011 14 0._ 1- 07 1 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-ima{y 2029 PM VV Protected T; Route 11 & Lake Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL UYBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Future Volume ;vehih) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 98f 64 202 1070 190 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Dat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 11326 1626 1055 1856 1870 1856 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 4 72 42 0 39 1422 0 210 1115 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0,96 0.0 0.96 0,96 0.96 0,R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 i 5 5 3 ? 2 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 219 124 211 78 242 1247 309 1303 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.07 {1.00 0.05 0.04 9A0 0,03 0.67 O.CC 0Ab D.70 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 3826 0 1767 18M 1555 1767 1670 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 D 39 1022 0 210 1115 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 8.5 1.8 U 4.4 2.6 0.0 0.8 46,5 0.0 4.2 51,7 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 8.5 1.8 0.0 4.4 2,6 0.0 0.8 46.5 0.17 4.2 51,7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehih 219 124 211 78 242 1247 309 1303 VIC Ratio(X) 0.72 0,25 0,34 0.54 0.16 0.82 0,68 0.86 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 219 334 212 285 264 1247 389 1303 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.0{1 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.10 1,00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 49.9 51,2 C1_0 49.5 54.2 0.0 18.4 13.8 0.0 20.2 13.1 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 11.1 1.0 C1,0 1,0 5.6 0.0 0.3 6.1 0,0 3.4 7.3 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehfln 5.2 0.9 0,0 2,0 1.3 0.0 0.5 19.5 0.0 3.7 21.6 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 61.0 52.2 0.0 50.5 59.8 0.0 16.7 20.0 0.0 23.5 20.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D D E S E C C Apprcauh Vol, veb!h 169 A 114 A 1U11 A 1325 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 59.6 913.9 'I �_ 8 21.0 Approach LOS E D 0 C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.0 82.1 10.3 12.2 8.1 85.0 13.0 9.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 11.7 73.8 5.9 20,6 5.0 80,5 8.5 11.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 6.2 48.5 6.4 3.8 2.8 53,7 10.5 4.6 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.3 9.8 0.4 0.1 0:0 11.7 0.0 0.1 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 24.L HChA 6th LOS C; N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tln7irtl,b 2029 PM VV 4 -Lane (; ROLL tc 1 & -�iko Strr t 1L&ko S`r et 1 , IE:772I Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N13L IN HT NBR SOL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians I 1� '� 1~4 �i t r 111 ++ Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Future Volume (vph) 152 30 fig 40 37 981 64 202 1070 190 Turn Type Split NA SPi# NA pm+pt NA Perm pmvt PSA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 5 $ 5 2 1 6 Permitbad Phases 2 2 5 6 Di3tectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 32.7 32.7 12,3 35.5 35.5 Total SPI it(%) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 10.6% 36.3% 36.3% 13.7' 39A% 39.4% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 110 160 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnlze? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.1 12.1 9.7 9.7 33.5 28.5 2.8.5 39.9 35.5 35.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 0.16 Q.13 0.13 0.44 0.37 0.37 0.52 0.46 0,46 vie Ratio 0,57 0.26 0.32 0.69 0.17 0.78 4.10 4.77 0.68 0.24 Control Delay 39.1 16.7 34.8 16.611 13.2 .28.3 4.7 37.1 22.0 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 D.0 17.0 0,0 01.0 t].0 0.0 17,0 Total Df:lay 39.1 16.7 34.6 116,5 13.2 2$,3 0,7 37.1 22,0 3.9 LOS D E C B E C A D C A App, cauh Deiay 31.5 20.2 26.1 2.1.7 Approach LOS C C C C Intersedan Summa Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length; 76.4 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type; ,Actuated-Unc�ofdinated Maximum ulc Ratio: 0.78 Intersection Signal Nlay. 23.5 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intertion Capacity Utilization 78.1% ILLI Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7, Route 11 u Laka Street )Laky Street 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection SUn-ima{y 2029 PM 1N 4 -Lane T; Route 111 & Lake Street /Laico Stre:ct 11:12.2021 ---w 41 -01 I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Configurations 14 1 T V +t ++ r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 Hi 64 202 1470 190 Future Volume ;wehih) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 98t 64 202 1070 190 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.a0 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1826 1855 1856 1870 1856 1870 1M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 0 72 42 0 39 1022 0 210 1115 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,06 0,96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 i 5 5 3 3 2 3 £ 2 Cep, vehlh 219 225 121 124 312 15.49 390 1750 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.07 0,07 0AU 0.04 0.44 {r.00 0A9 D.49 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 3525 1585 1767 3554 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 D 39 1022 0 210 1115 0 Grp Bat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 1763 1555 1767 1777 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 5.6 1-D U 2.5 1..4 0.0 0.8 14.7 0.0 3.9 14.9 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 5.6 1'0 0.0 2.5 1.4 0.0 0.8 14.7 0.17 3,9 14,0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.010 1.00 0.60 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 211 225 121 124 312 1549 390 1750 VJC Ratio(X) 0.75 0,14 0.60 0.34 0,13 0.66 0,54 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 492 525 500 512 380 1549 442 1750 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh .27,3 25.2 0.0 29.1 28.5 0.0 10.0 14.2 U 10.6 12,0 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 5.3 0.3 0.0 4.7 1.6 0.0 [l.2 2.2 0,0 1.2 1.8 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 2.5 0.4 0,0 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.3 5.6 4.0 1.4 5.4 0:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slvah 32.5 25.6 0.0 33.7 30.2 0.0 10.2 16.4 0.0 11.7 13,8 0.0 LnGrp LOS C C C C 8 B B B Appfcauh Vol, veb!h 169 A 114 A 1U11 A 1325 R Approach Delay, s.,veh 31.4 32.4 1 b.2 115 Approach LOS C C D B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 32.7 12,2 7.0 36.1 8.8 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.6 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 7.8 28.2 18.0 5.0 31.0 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 5.9 16.7 7.6 2.8 16.9 4.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 5.5 0.4 0.0 8.8 0.3 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 16.L HCl`A 6th LOS P Notes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service; NB RCrite 11 2029 AM W Segment LOS 10.25-2021 Arterial Flow RiAnaing Signal Travel t}fist Artsrlal Arterial Cro"Steet Cass Sqr 1 Tito l lby TimeW (N) Sped LOS Lako StreeL 111 30 63,2 74.2 137.4 0153 13.8 E Puripii -�nui C1 III 3G 1177.5 M.6 1.4.1 p t () 24.1 B Total 111 170,7 100,8 271.5 1,42 18.9 4 Arterial Level of Service: SB Rotate 11 Arterial, Floe Running 5jgral Travel Dist Arterial ArteMl Gross Sircet Class BpeLd Time Dof ay Time {s} m0, Spelt LO Puapu3a11ui 51 III N, 94.3 20.5 114.8 179 24,6 B Lakc.5l,ree; III H 1G7.v 35.1 142.6 0,90 22.6 C Total 5.00 pm Baseline 201.8 55.6 257.4 1.68 29.5 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service; NB Rorlte 11 2029 PM W Segment LOS 10.25-2021 Arterial Flow RiAnaing, Signal Travel Dist Arlerlai Arterial Cro" Steel, Cass Speed Time D61e' Times N Seed LOS Lako Street III 3D 83,2 55.0 119,2 153 15.9 D Purrpuaanui Si III 3G 1117.5 24.2 131.7 0,z 0 24.5 B Total 1111 170,7 80.2 250,9 1,42 200 C Arterial Level of Service: SB Rotate 11 Arterial, Floe Running Signal Travel D[St Arterial Artertial Gross Sircet Class BpeLd Time Delay Time {sf N :Speed I_+;' Puapu;3anoi S1 III 3tr 94-2 48.2 142A 0.79 19.9 C I..akn Street III 30 187.5 4'„8 149.3 0.90 21.6 C Total 5.00 pm Baseline 201.7 90.0 291.7 1.68 20.8 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 AppendixH Analysis Reports -u Future Without Project Conditions (2039) Tin7ir(lS 2039 ,AM "10 1: Falaili Rd & RoLlte 11 1 c12.2321 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WET NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations M tt r M tlt e 1) ++ r ' tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 71 595 21B 1154 $68 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Future Volume (vph; 71 594 1-18 164 868 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Turn Type 'rot NA Perri Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 5 Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 9,5 38.5 38,5 95 385 38.5 9.,5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 10.0 39.0 39,G 14.0 43.0 43,0 18.0 51.9 51,9 10.1 44,0 44.0 Total SPI it(%) 8.7% 33.9% 33.9% 12.2% 37A% 37,4% 15.7% 45.1°l* 45110 8.8% 38.3% 38.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tirne (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{3 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies 'yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None None Nave None Act Effct Green (s) 5.6 35.2 35.2 &9 40.9 40.9 11.4 29.4 29.4 5.7 17.1 17.1 Actuated grC Ratio UG 0.39 D.39 0,10 0.45 0.45 0.13 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.19 6.19 vie Raba 0.37 0.47 0.32 0 51 0;56 0.04 0.59 0.17 0.20 0.19 0,49 0.43 Control Delay 50.6 24.5 6.0 47.1 23.4 0.1 45.3 22.7 5.3 49.8 34.9 16.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.6 6.0 0.0 o.0 t].D 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 50.6 24.5 5.0 41.1 23.4 0.1 45.3 22.7 5,3 48.8 34,9 10.4 LOS D C A D C A 0 C A D C 8 Appicauh Letay 2.1.8 263 29,0 27.1 Approech LOS C C C C Intersection Summa C+yCle Lenglth:115 Actuated Cycle Length, 90.9 Natural Cycle: 100 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0.59 Inteisectlan Signal Delay25.6 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersedon taapacity Utilization 63.3% ICU Level of 5eNce B Analysis Period (min) 15 1. Palani Rd & Raute 11 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Intersection Sun-tma{y 2039 AM WO 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 arrtent EBL EBT EBR 'WBL dlBT VJBR NQL NOT MR SEL f $,OR Lane Configurations �1 tt r )I tt 1) ++ r Traffic Volume (veWh) 71 590 218 164 888 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Future Volume ;vehlh) 71 590 `318 164 868 33 243 192 117 21 321 177 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 120 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1737 1767 1737 1841 1011 1841 1841 1070 1856 1670 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 72 602 D 167 886 0 248 1% 0 21 328 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.90 U8 0.98 0,98 0.98 0,38 0.08 0,98 0.98 0,98 13.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cep, vehlh 160 1543 249 1661 342 775 42 500 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.46 0.00 0.07 0,48 •0.00 0.10 0.22 UQ G.02 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1560 3401 3554 1572 1751 3554 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 72 502 C, 167 886 0 248 190 0 21 328 0 Grp Sat F7ovv(s),vehlhlln 1605 1678 1172 1700 1721 1560 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1555 Q Serves -s), s 1.7 9.4 C.G 3.8 14.3 0.0 a.6 3.ia 0.0 0.9 7'a 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 1.7 9.4 0.0 3.8 14,3 0.0 5.6 3.6 4.0 0.9 7.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.b0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 160 1543 249 1661 342 775 42 500 VJC Ratio(X) 0.45 0.39 D.67 0.53 0,72 0.25 0.51 0.66 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 221 1543 405 1661 576 2112 125 1760 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.110 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 36.5 14.2 0.0 3&0 14.4 0.0 34.8 25.3 U 38.5 32.4 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 2.0 0.7 0.4 3.1 1,2 0.0 2.9 0.2 0,0 9.2 1.5 0.0 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirtDftD(54°l9),vehfln 0.7 3.4 0.0 1.6 5.3 0.0 2,4 1.5 4.0 0.5 3.0 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),siveh 38.8 14.9 0.0 39.1 15.6 0.0 37.7 26.4 0.0 47.7 33.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Appfcauh Vol, veil h 674 A 1053 A 444 A 349 fit Approach Delay, s.,veh 17.5 19.3 32.5 34.7 Approach LOS B B C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 21.9 10.3 41,2 12.5 15.7 8.5 43.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.6 47.4 9.5 34.5 13.5 39.5 5.5 38.5 Max Q Clear Time (9_o+11), s 2.9 5,0 5,8 11.4 7.6 9.0 3.7 16.3 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.3 0.2 4.1 0.4 2.3 0.0 6.4 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 23.3 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2139 AM WO 2: Henry St & Routo 11 1V12.202'I -' 9 t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations M tt r +t 0 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 10T 479 124 57 784 507 146 337 47 403 339 Future Vol urne (vph) 107 479 124 57 784 507 146 337 47 403 339 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prot 1+fA Porro Split NA Psrm Split NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 Qetectof Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 n Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 0.5 30.5 30 9.5 30.5 30.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 35,5 Total Split (s) 10.0 33.0 33.G 10.0 a3,0 33,0 36.5 36.5 36,5 35.5 35,5 Total SPI €t(%) 8.7% 28.7% 28.7% 8.710 28.7% 26.7% 31.7% 31.7% 31.7% 30.9% 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{3 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 Tatar Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 LeadLag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None None Name Act Effct Green (s) 5.6 31A 31.4 16 29.0 29.0 17.7 17.7 17.7 24.2 24.2 Actuated grO Ratio O.OG 0.33 D.33 0,06 0.31 0.31 0.19 0,19 0.19 0.26 0.26 vie Ratio 0.60 0.45 0.22 0,30 0,78 0.63 6.47 0.58 0.13 0.73 .0.71 Control Delay 61.6 30.1 6.9 51.5 38.3 6.8 40,3 39.3 0.8 44.7 36.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.O 0.0 0.4 0.0 O.t} 4.0 0.4 0.0 Total Delay 61.6 30.1 6.9 51.5 38.3 6.5 40,3 39.3 0,8 44.7 36.2 LOS E C A D D A D D A D a App, cauh Deiay 30.8 27,0 36.2 30.1 Approa5h LOS C C 1} 11 Intersection Summa Cycle Length:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 94.8 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control TyDe: Semi Act-1lncoord Nlaxirr um vlc Ratio: 0.78 Intersecllan Signal Celay: 32.2 Intersectlan LOIS: C Inter tion Capacity 1JOiization 69,8¢ ICU Level of SeNce C Analysis Period (min) 15 Split}s and Phases: 2: HenrySt & RaIUW 11 i77 05 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lnte' section Capacity Analysts 2039 AM WO 2. Henry St & Route 11 11;12.202`1 '# t ► I'41oamerrt EBL EBT EBR 'WBL W'BT WBR fNBL NBT IBR SBL SBT SBFT Lane Configurations'' c Critical Lane Croup Traffic Volume (vph) 107 479 124 57 784 507 146 337 47 403 339 124 Future Volume (vph) 107 470 124 57 784 507 146 337 47 403 339 124 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 Wl 1900 1900 19M 1900 19M 3900 1900 1900 190€7 19M 1900 Total Lost lime (s) 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane 4ttil, Factcar 0,97 0.95 1. DO 0.97 0.95 1.00 G.91 9.81 1.00 0.91 0,91 Frpb, ped;bikes 1,00 1.00 D.99 1,00 1,00 0,99 1,44 1.00 0,99 1.00 1,00 Flpb, pedfbikes 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Frt IM 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.00 0,97 Flt Proleccled 0,95 1,00 1. DO 0.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1,01} 1.GG 0.95 0,99 Said, Flaw (p;otf 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1467 1595 3175 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Setd. Flow (perm) 3099 3282 1510 3303 3406 1548 1.564 3348 1487 t595 3175 Peat[ -hour factor, PHF 0.97 11.97 17.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0_97 0.97 01.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 110 494 128 59 808 523 151 347 48 415 349 128 RTOR Reductkx� (vph ) 0 0 86 0 0 358 0 0 39 0 21 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 110 494 42 59 80B 165 136 362 9 299 572 0 Confl, Peds. (Nhr} 2 2 4 3 3 4 Confl. Bikes (R+hr) 1 Heavy Vehides "°'4 4 - 13% 1ali5 5% 6% 6% 3'1fa 51Aoit 3% 7% 3% 4% 51!0 Turn Type Prot INA Perm Prot NA Peer S ft NA Perm Split NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 n Pgrmitled Phases 4 a 2 Actuated Green. G(s) 5,6 31,4 31.4 4.3 30.1 30.1 17,+ 17.7 17.7 24.2 24.2 Effective Green, g (s) 5.6 321.4 31.4 4,3 30.1 30.1 17.7 17.7 17.7 24.2 24..2 Actuated g)C natio 0.06 0.33 0.33 0,04 0,31 0.31 0-19 0,19 0,19 0,25 0025 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 41.5 V'ehde Extension fs} 10 3.0 10 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vph) 181 1077 497 148 1072 497 289 619 275 403 803 v+s Ratio Prot c0.04 0.15 0.02 c0.24 0.09 u0.11 c0.19 0.18 Vs Ratio Perm 07,03 0.11 0.01 v.+c Ratio 0.61 OA6 ME 0,40 0.75 0.34 0,47 0.58 0,03 0.74 0.71 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 43,9 25.4 22.2 44.4 219.4 25.1 34.8 35.6 31,9 32.8 32.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.40 1.H 1. GO 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Inc'emental Delay, d2 51 1.4 0.3 1.8 4.9 1-9 1.2 1.4 O,C 7.2 M Delay (s) 49,6 26.8 215 4&2 343 27,0 36,0 37.0 32,0 40,0 35.5 Le'v'el of Service D C C D C C D €7 C 0 D Appfua; th Delay (.sl 29.5 32.1 36.3 37.0 Approach LA'S C C L' D tntersection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 33.1 r- v12f t; is Lev-,, c;f Se.r,;,cP C HC 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated C be Length (s-) 95.6 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 intersection Capacity Oliaatim 69.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Croup 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 61:h TWSC 2039 AM WO I RaUtO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2721 Intersection Int DelFy. siveh 2816 Movement EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Gonliguretions $1620.7 0 r B t f ` Traffic Vol, vehrh 44 54 t 56 1299 1034 30 Future Vol, vehlh 44 54 156 11299 1034 30 CeniticOng Peds, Or 0 a 0 0 1 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Mane - YAd Storage Length 140 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Starager # ti - - 0 0 Grade, % 0 0 4 Peak Hour Faclor g3 93 93 93 93 93 HeavyVeh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 MAvint Flow 47 58 168 1387 1112 32 Major"Oa mincx2 MOM majol Conflicting Flovu AJI 2846 1113 0 0 Stage 1 1113 - - - - - Stage 2 1733 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 4.12 - - - Critical Crit cal t4dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Maneuver -19 0 627 Stage 1 314 0 - - Slage 2 156 0 - Platoon blocied, % - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver -14 - 626 - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar -14 - Stage 1 230 Stage 2 156 Approach ES NIS SB HGM Control Delay, $1620.7 1.4 0 HCM LOS F Minor Cants major MM vmt NBL NBT EBLr11 EBW 'SBT SBR Capacity (vehh) 626 - 14 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,268 - 3.:179 - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 12.8 $1620.7 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F A - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 1.1 - 6.8 Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity $; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Ara] major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseaine Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2039 AM WO 4; ROLItE3 11 & I lUalalai Rd (South � 1 c12.2n21 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h I.~ Movement WBL WBIR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonrigurations j r T A B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) t Traffic Vol, vehrh 9 140 1317 15 73 1006 Future Vol, vehih 9 140 1317 15 73 1006 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Ykdd - None Storage Langlh fl 0 Veh in Median Starager # 0 - B Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Faclor g3 93 93 93 ;,-'i I,} Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 1: 6 5 MAvinl Flow 10 151 1418 16 78 108 Major"Oa minel MOM Majol Conflicting Flovu AJI 2662 0 0 1416 0 Stage 1 1424 - - - - - Stage 3238 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 - - 4.18 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ _ _ 2.254 _ Poo CW 1 Mammar 75 g T - 469 - Stage 1 222 0 - - Slage 2 274 0 _ _ _ _ Platoon blocied, ''k - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 21 - - - 469 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuvar 21 - - - - Stage 1 222 Stage 2 229 . Approach WB NO SB HGM Contra Delay, s 279.3 0 1 HCM LOS F mhor LarWmajor MM vmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLrk SBL SBT Capacity (vehh) - - 21 - 469 - HGM Lane V.'C Rat#o - - G.461 - 0.167 - MGM Control Delay (s) - - 279.3 0 14.2 - HCtwf Lane LDS - IF A B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1.3 - 0.6 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Tln7ir(l,b 2039 AM "10 b:ULItc'' 1 i & Puaptlaarlui t 1 IE:7721 Lane Group EBL. EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SEIR Lane Configuratians I t r I t + + r Traffic Volume (vph) 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 985 24 43 901 68 Future'ValJme (vphj 193 9 75 110 59 140 104 985 24 43 901 fib Turn Type Perris NA Perm. Perm NA Perris pm+p# NA Perm lam+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 0 $ 8 5 2 2 f n 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 2.2.5 Total Split (s) 23.5 23.5 23.5 23.5 215 23,5 9.5 57.0 57X, 9.5 57,0 V.0 Total SPI it(%) 26.1°lo 26.1°x, 26.1% 26.1% 26.1° 26.1% 10.6114 63.3"!a 63,3°.il 10.6% C3.301c 63.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lap Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yea Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Nore Max Max None Max Max ktEffct Green (s) 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 16.9 57.7 54.8 54.8 55.8 53.0 53.0 Actuated gr'G Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.67 0.63 0.63 0.66 0.61 6.61 vie Rabb 0,80 0.03 a22 0:43 0.16 0.35 0.50 0.89 0,03 0.25 0,86 0.07 Control Delay 57.4 28.6 8.8 36.2 30.6 7.9 13.5 27.7 OX 8.0 25.7 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 6,0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.4 28.6 b.a 36,2 30.b 7,9 13.5 27,7 O.0 8.0 25,7 2.3 LOS E C A C C A 8 C A A C A App, cauh Letay 43.2 22.3 25.7 23.3 Approach LOS C C C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 86.3 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: 0.89 Inteiseclion Signal delay; 26.3 Interseatlan LOS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 84,6*A ICU Level of Service P Analysis Period (min) 15 S lits and Phases: 5: Route 11 & Pua aanui St 01 102 05 T 06 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2039 AM WO 5; Route 11 &, Puapuaanul St 11112-2021 , *--- *� t41 I'4layament EBS. EBT EBR VVBL VVFBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t r I t t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 193 9 75 110 59 140 1014 99 24 43 901 65 Future Volume ;vehlh) 193 9 75 110+ 59 140 1'01 985 24 43 901 68 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,a0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 9$70 1870 1870 1855 1870 1670 1826 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 310 10 0 117 64 0 113 1048 0 46 959 0 Peak Hour Factor €,1.02 0.92 0.02 0.94 0,92 0,94 0.92 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,94 0,92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 5 2 Gap,vehl11 317 383 363 383 256 1123 199 1078 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.2D {1.00 0.20 0,20 0.110 0.05 0.61 UOQ Q.04 0,59 0.00 Sat Flow,vehfh 1338 1870 1505 1405 1870 1585 1751 1856 1555 1751 1826 1SB5 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 210 10 G 117 64 D 113 1048 0 46 959 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1338 1870 1585 1405 1870 1585 1781 1856 1585 1781 1826 1555 Q Serve{s_s), s 13.6 0.4 Q.G i 5 2.5 0.0 2.1 45.5 0.0 0.9 40.3 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 16.1 0.4 0.0 6.8 2,5 0.0 2.1 45.5 OX 0.9 40.3 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.DG 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehllh 317 383 363 383 256 1123 199 1076 VJC Ratio(X) 0.66 0.03 0.32 0.17 0,44 0.93 0.23 0.89 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 329 400 375 400 262 1123 281 1078 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.170 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 UpstreamFiter(I) 1.00 1.40 0.04 1,00 1,04 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DQ 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 35.5 28.3 CIO 31.0 29.1 0.0 17.3 15.9 C.0 18.3 15.7 0,0 her Delay (d2). slveh 4.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.2 0.0 1.2 14.9 0.0 0.6 11.0 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 4.8 0.2 0.4 2.2 1.1 0.0 1,2 21.2 0.0 0.5 17.9 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 40A 28.3 0.0 31.5 29.3 0.0 18,5 30.9 0.0 18.9 26.7 10 LnGrp LOS D C C C S C B C Appcauh Vol, vett h 220 A 181 A 1161 A 1005 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 39.9 3 01. 7 2D.7 f6.3 Approach LOS D C C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 7.9 55.3 22.7 9.2 57.0 22.7 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.0 52.5 19.0 5.0 52.5 19.G Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2,9 47.5 18.1 44.1 42.3 8.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 3.3 01 0,0 5.3 0.4 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 29.3 HChit 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, ESR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2039 AM WO 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakin� Stro(-,t 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht 11"09Y s.veh EA 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) r Nctfs t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 159 602 1035 1029 0 Future Vol, vehih 0 159 602 1035 102 0 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - None - )rkk Storage Length 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stuager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 4 2 5 5 7 MAvint Flaw 0 171 547 1113 1106 0 MajorUrinr Mircx2 Majorl k1afnr2 ConllicGng Flovu AJI 3513 1106 CI - u Stage 1 1106 - - - - - Stage 2 2407 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 55.42 4.12 - - - Crit cal 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5,42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 _ _ - Poi CW1 Maneuver 7 0 —631 - - _ Stage 1 317 0 - - 5lage 2 71 0 Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - —631 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 0 - - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Stage 2 71 Ap'proaoh M N6 8B HCM Control Delay, s 0 25.1 0 HCM LOS A Minor UrWmajor MMl,smnt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SBT SBR Capacity (vehh) ; 631 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 1.026 - - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 138.2 - 0 D HGNI Lane LDS F - A it - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 16.6 - - Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S: Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWcifl Not Defined `. Afl major value ira platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tinlir(l,b 2039 ,AM "10 (; Rt UtCl 1 -�Ikt) Strt-'e:t 1 12:2721 Large Group EBIL EBT W8L 'WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians I 1� T4 + r f ' Traffic Volume (vph) 278 48 59 36 33 1052 55 150 878 142 Future Volume ,vphj 278 48 fig 36 33 1052 55 160 875 142 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pt NA Perm pm-�pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Sp1i# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (8) 27.0 27.0 230 23,0 9,5 57.0 87.0 130 90,5 90.5 Total SPI it(%) 18.0% 18.D% 15.3% 15.3% 6.3% 56.0% 58.0% 8.7% 60.3% 60.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 110 160 1.0 I'D 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None None Ncne None None Max Max Mane Max Max ActEffctGreen (s) 22.5 22.5 18.5 1$,5 87.5 82.5 82.5 94.7 87.9 67.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.58 0.55 0.55 0.63 0.59 0.59 vie Ratio 1.12 4.43 0.34 1.18 0.23 1.09 0.07 1.19 0.86 0.16 Contra! Delay 146.5 44.0 65,G 145.9 13.8 893 1.9 167.8 36.7 5.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,L` 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 146.5 44.0 65.0 14;;.9 13,8 89,7 1.9 167.a 30,7 5.a LOS F to E F B F A F 0 A App, cauh Decay 116,2 132,1 83.3 50.8 Appreech LOS F F F 0 Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuale�! Cycle Length. 150 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoard Maximum vlc Ratio-. 1.19 Inteisectlan Signal Delay. 81.4 Intersectlan LOIS F lntersDction Capacity Util izaton 114,E ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 2 404 438 r 0_. 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Pagh 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2039 AM WO T Route 11 & Lako Street 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T Vi t + Traffic Volume (vehfh) 278 48 59 59 36 296 33 1052 55 W 878 142 Future Volume ;vehih) 278 48 69 69 36 296 33 1052 65 160 878 142 Initial Q (0b), veto D 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.04 1.00 1_CI0 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.40 1.00 1. DO 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1874 1670 1856 1870 1870 1810 1070 1449 18? 1 1856 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 296 51 0 73 38 0 35 1119 4 170 934 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 8.94 0.94 0,94 4.94 0,94 D.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Gap, vehlh 287 302 141 107 247 1106 157 1161 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.46 0.06 0.110 0.03 0.54 U OC 0.06 0.63 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 3870 0 1781 1870 15610 1725 1856 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 236 51 G 73 38 0 35 1119 0 170 934 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 15601 1725 1856 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 22.5 3.3 D.a 5.7 2.7 0.0 1.1 82.5 4.0 8.5 52.9 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 22,5 3.3 0.0 5.7 2,7 0.0 1.1 82.5 4.17 8,5 52.9 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 O.DG 1.04 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veW h 287 302 141 107 247 11D6 157 1161 VJC Ratio(X) 1.03 0.17 D.72 0.35 0,14 1.01 1,08 0.80 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 287 302 234 248 263 1106 157 1161 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.0{1 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.04 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.04 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.017 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 58.5 50.4 0.0 47 63.3 0.0 19,2 28.5 0,C- 48.8 19,7 0,0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 61.1 0.3 0.0 $.3 2.0 0.0 0.3 29.9 0.0 96.3 6.0 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.11 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirClftD(54°l9),vehfln 15.01 1.6 0.0 2.8 1.4 0.0t DA 44.2 0.0 7.4 23.7 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),siveh 119.8 50.7 0.0 73.9 65.3 0.0 19A 58.4 0.0 145.1 25,6 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D E E B F F C Appfcauh Vol, veb!h 347 A 111 A 1154 A 1104 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 109.5 71.0 917.2 44.0 Approach LCIS F E E D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 .2 4 5 5 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 57.0 27.0 8.2 91.8 12.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8.5 82.5 22.5 5.0 86.0 18.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 10.5 84,5 24.5 3.1 54.9 7.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 59.1 HChA 6th LOS E N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Tin7ir(l,b 2039 AM WO 8. Rc Lite} 1 i & �ariii;+>anic:lia III Fuad 1 :122021 Analysis Period (min) 15 Sulits and Phases: 8. Route 11 & Kamehameha ill Read at 0&3 -1111. --r tod t I Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NIST 8€1L SET Lane Configuratians 4 r 4:4 T +, Traffic Volume (vph) 5 26 12 76 643 16 561 Future Volume (vph) 5 26 12 Ifs 643 16 561 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permitbad Phases 2 Di3tectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 30,0 30.0 3Q0 9.5 23.5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.4 30.4 30,0 13.8 45,0 9.6 40.8 Total SPI rt(%) 26.4% 26.4"f3 26.10 12.0°x, 39.1° 6.39 35.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{t 110 1.0 1.0 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yas 'des Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Nene Norge Max None Max Act Effct Green (s) 1510 15.0 7.3 8,6 47.3 5.2 40.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.00 0.11 0.58 O.G6 0.49 vie Raba OZ3 0.08 0.29 0.48 0,68 0.15 0.58 Control Delay 41.4 0.5 31.8 47.7 21.6 44.5 18.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Do42y 41.4 4.5 31,$ 47,7 21,6 44,5 18,3 LOS D A C 0 C Q B App, cauh Delay 36.3 31.B 24.4 18.8 Approe5h LOS D C C B Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length; 81.8 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum We Rano: 0.68 Inteiseclion Signal Delay; 23.2 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 67,0*A ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Sulits and Phases: 8. Route 11 & Kamehameha ill Read at 0&3 •04 tod 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Reporl Page 16 FIC;Pr1 6:17 Sir;rtalizod Ir-tti,,rsuctiuri Surilni&,-y 2,.'J39 AM VV0 8; ROUte 1 III Rued 1 12:7721 I'4layament EBL EBI EBR WBIL UVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SOR Lane Configurations 4 r T. I +T Traffic Volume (vehfh) 179 5 26 16 12 17 76 643 15 16 frail 320 Future Volume ;vehih) 179 5 25 16 12 17 76 643 15 16 561 320 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.04 0.95 1-CI0 0,85 1.00 1.00 Parking alas. Ad} 1.40 1.010 1.D0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1811 1870 1722. 1874 1781 17D6 1752 1011 1870 1870 1811 1811 Adj Row Rate,. vehlh 192 5 D 17 13 1a 82 691 16 17 603 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.K 0.93 0,93 0,93 0.93 O0 93 0,93 0.93 0,93 D.93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 2 12 2 8 7 10 6 2 2 6 6 Cep. vehlh 252 7 24 18 26 103 957 22 36 1743 Arrive On Gruen 0.15 0.15 (1.00 0,04 0.f)4 9.44 10,06 0.55 a.55 0.02 D.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1738 45 1459 569 435 603 1668 1762 41 1781 3532 0 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 197 0 D 48 0 D 82 0 707 17 603 0 Grp Sat Flovv(s),vehlhlln 1783 0 1459 1608 0 0 1668 0 1803 1781 1721 0 Q Serve{s_s), s 7.B 4.9 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 21.5 0,7 7.7 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_c), 5 7.8 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0 21.5 0.7 7.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.04 0.35 0.37 1.00 0.02 1.00 0 -CIO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 259 0 68 0 0 103 0 969 36 1743 VJC Ratio(X) 0.76 OA0 0.70 0.06 0.00 0.79 0.00 0.71 0,48 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 626 0 555 0 0 210 D M 123 1743 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,x 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0. DO 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 30.3 0.0 0.0 349 0.0 0-0 341 4.0 12.41 35.6 10,9 0.0 Inc= Delay (d2). slveh 4.6 0.0 0.4 12.4 0.0 0.0 12.6 b.0 4.4 9.7 0.5 0.0 In!t al Q Delay(Q) siveh 10.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacictDftD(54°l9),vehfln 3.6 DA 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 7.8 0.4 2.5 D:Ct Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 34.9 0.4 0.0 47.3 0.0 0.0 46.8 0.4 16.8 45.4 11.4 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A B D B Appfcauh Vol, vett h 197 A 48 754 620 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 34.9 47.3 19.9 12.4 Approach LOS C D B B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.2 9.1 41.9 7.6 6.0 45.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 25.9 9.3 36.3 25.5 5.1 40.5 Max Q Cleat Time (g_c+i1), s 9.8 5.6 5,7 4.2 2.7 23.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.9 0.0 3.9 0,2 0.0 4.2 Intefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay �9.? HCl`A 6th LOS 0 N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 Tin7ir(lS 2039 PM "10 1: Falaili Rd & RoLito 11 1 �c 12.2321 � f- 4- I Large Group EBL EBT EBR IA IWBT X1+1 W WL. T NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians +� Traffic Volume (vph) 2GO 1116 508 226 785 56 227 283 263 54 313 107 Future Volume (vph; 2,130 1126 5D3 226 785 56 227 283 263 54 313 107 Turn Type 'rot NA Perm. Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 5 Qetectc,r Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9.5 38.5 38.5 9,$ 38.5 X5 9.5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 16.3 44.0 44,0 13,2 40.9 40,9 13.3 47.0 47,0 10.8 44,5 44.5 Total SPI rt(%) 14.2% 38.3% 36.3% 11.5% 35.6% 35.6% 11.6114 40.9% 40.9% 9,4% 38.7% 38.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.x.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnlze? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Notre Max Max None Ncne None Nave Name None Act Effct Green (s) 112 39.9 39.9 8.8 37.6 37.6 8.9 21.7 21.7 6.2 16.8 16.8 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 0.43 D.43 0.09 0.41 0.41 0.10 0.23 0.23 0,07 0.18 6.18 vie Raba 0.65 0.76 0.58 0.71 0.57 0.08 0.71 0.35 0,50 0.46 0.50 0.29 Control Delay 48.3 28.1 9.5 55.3 250 1.3 55.4 30.8 9,5 57.9 35.8 7.8 Queue Delay 0.6 4.17 47.4 0.0 010 0.6 0.0 010 0.1) 0.0 0.6 0.0 Total delay 45,3 28.1 9.5 55.3 25-1 1.3 55.4 30.8 9.5 57.9 35.8 7.8 LOS ID C A E C A E C A E 0 A App, cauh De! ay 25.9 30.2 30.8 32.0 Appro�ah LOS C 0 C C Intersection Summa, Cycle Lei glth:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 92,7 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Ty:ae: Semi Act-Unroord Nlaximum u c Ratio: 0.76 Intersectlan Signal Nlay. 28.6 Intersectlan LOIS: C Inter don Capaci#y Utilization 68,51A ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 1: Palani t 4 Route 11 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Intersection SUMMary 2033 PM WO 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 I'4layamerrt EBL EBT EBR 'U'r BL VVBT VVBR NBL NET NBR SBL SBT SER Lane Configurations �1 tt iiN M tt r V ft ' tt r Traffic Volume (vWh) 260 1126 503 Z26 785 56 227 283 263 54 313 107 Future Volume ;wehlh) 266 1125 5G3 226 785 M 227 283 263 54 313 107 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1855 1856 1810 1870 1841 1870 1855 1870 1870 1870 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 265 1149 0 231 801 0 232 283 0 55 319 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.95 0,98 0,98 0,98 198 0.96 0,98 0.98 0,38 0.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 3 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 P 2 f 2 Gap, vehlh 350 1643 309 1586 310 672 76 503 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.47 {1.00 0.09 0,45 9.00 0.09 0.19 {r.00 0.94 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3428 3526 1585 3456 3497 1585 3428 3554 1585 1781 3554 1585 Grp Volume(v;. vehfh 265 1149 G 231 80f 0 232 288 0 55 3'.9 0 Grp Bat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1714 1763 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 1777 1585 Q Serves -s), s b-4 21.9 0.G 5.5 13.8 0.0 a.6 6.1 0.0 2.6 7.2 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 6.4 21.9 0,0 5.5 13,8 0.0 5.6 6.1 4.0 2,6 7.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.40 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 360 1643 309 1586 310 67.2 76 503 VIC Ratio(X) 0.76 0.70 0,75 0.51 0.75 0.43 6,72 0 63 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 477 16413 355 1586 356 178.2 132 M77 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.0{1 1,00 1.00 1.170 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 37,0 17.9 0.0 37.6 16.4 9.0 37.6 30.3 0,0 40.1 34.3 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 4.7 2.5 0.4 7.3 1.2 0.0 7.4 0.4 0,0 12.0 1.3 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 2.8 S,6 0.0 2.6 5.3 0.4 2.6 2.6 0.0 1.4 3.1 0:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slvoh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 41,7 20.4 0.0 44.9 17.6 0.0 45.0 30.8 0.0 52.1 35.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D B D C D D Approauh Vol, veb!h 1414 A 1032 A 521 A 374 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 24.4 23.7 37.1 38.0 Approach LCIS C C 0 D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 20.5 12.1 44.0 12.2 10,5 13.2 42.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.3 42.5 8.7 39.5 8.8 40.0 11.8 36A Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 4,0 8,1 7.5 23.9 7.6 9.2 8.4 15.a Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 2.0 0.1 7.3 0.1 2.2 0.3 5.5 Intersection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 273 HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed frorn cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2039 PM WO 2: Henry St & Route 11 1 V12.202'I --*� 11111 t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL Bi" Lane CDnfiguratians M ++ r M +� 1 4+ 4t Traffic Volume (vph) 190 884 291 80 729 348 126 318 38 388 342 Future Volume (vph) 190 684 291 80 729 348 126 318 38 388 342 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. PrDt 1+IA Psrm Split NA Perm $OR NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2. Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 2 2 2 & 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 0.5 30.5 30,5 9.5 30.5 30.5 35.5 35.5 35,5 35.5 35,5 Total Split (s) 12.2 34.0 34.G 9 5 31.3 31.3 36.0 36.0 35,0 35.5 35,5 Total SPI it(%) 10.6% 29.6% 29.6% 8.3% 27.20 27.29 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 30.9% 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{t to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.G 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.O 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Notre Max Max None Acne None None None Act Effct Green (s) 7.8 32.3 32.8 5.1 27.2 27.2 17.0 17.0 1700 25.1 25.1 Actuated grO Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.05 0,29 0.29 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.26 0.26 vie Raba 0.71 0.75 0.41 0.45 0;75 0.51 0.41 0.55 0.11 0.75 0.71 Control Delay 60.6 36.2 6.1 58.0 35.8 6.5 39.8 39.7 O.6 45.2 34.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 4.0 L.0 Ox Total aolay 60.5 36.2 6,1 56,0 38.5 6.5 39,6 39.7 9.6 45.2 34.1 LOS E to A E D A 0 D A D C App, cauh Delay 33.9 303 36.8 37.9 Approe5h LOS C 0 1) I) Intersection Summa Cycle Length:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 95.4 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Uncoard Nlaximum We Ratio: 0.75 Interseclion Signal Delay: 33.8 Intersectlan LOS: C Intersection CaPaci#y Utilization 74.9°A ILLI Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: HenrySt & RaIUW 11 t '&h503' 07 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2039 PM WO 2. Henry St & Route 11 11112-2021 I'41oamem EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL ABT SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt r M +t 4+ 104 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 864 291 80 729 348 126 a18 38 388 342. 190 Future Volume (vph) 190 884 291 80 729 348 126 318 38 388 342 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1960 1940 1904 1900 1900 1900 3900 1900 1900 1900 1804 1900 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lana t l61, Fater 9.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.015 Q.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 0.91 Frpb, ped -bikes 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.90 0,98 1.00 -199 Flpb, pedJbikes I 1 1.90 1,04 1100 1,09 1.00 1.00 1.94 1,00 1,09 1.0 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1,1017 0.85 1.00 1,00 0.85 1.90 0.95 Flt Protected 0.9.5 1,00 1. DO 4.95 1.00 1,00 0.95 1,04 1.00 0.95 0,99 Saud, Flaw (protf 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1510 3195 Flt Permitted 9.95 1.00 1.04 9.95 1.00 1.04 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Setd, Flow (Derrl1f 3335 3539 15$3 3433 3471 1561 1.595 33$2 1537 1917 3195 Peal --hour IaCtor, U'H'F 0.98 0.98 0.98 9.98 0.98 t1.98 0.98 0.98 0:98 0.98 0.9a 0.98 Adj. Flow(Yph) 1R4 902 297 82 714 355 129 324 39 398 349 144 RTOR Reductaml (apFh) 0 0 193 0 0 250 0 0 32 0 41 0 Lane Group Flow (vphl 194 ,x:1,7 104 82 744 195 116 337 7 317 5R1 0 Gonfl, Peds. (Nhr} 1 1 4 7 7 4 Confl. Bikes (A'hr) 1 1 1 HeavyVehlct'es "ie 5% 21% 2% 2% 4% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 2 2% Turn Type Prat NA Perry Prct NA Perm split NA Perm Slit NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 fi 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 S 2 Actuated Green, G (s} 7.8 32.3 32.3 3.9 28.4 28.4 17.0 17.9 17.0 75.1 25.1 Effective Green, g fsj 7.8 323 32.3 3.9 28.4 28.4 17.0 17.11 17.0 25.1 25,1 Actuated g C Rand 0,08 0.34 0.34 0,94 0„28 9,29 0-18 0,18 0,18 0,26 9,2b Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehde Extension fs} 3.0 3.0 3.0 10 3,0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap(vphf 270 1187 530 139 1023 46U 281 597 271 419 832 V+s Ratio Prat cO.ID6 0.25 9.02 0,21 0.97 e.0.10 c10.20 €1.18 Vs Ratio Perm O.G7 0.07 0.00 v.'c Ratio 0,72 0,76 0,20 0,69 0.73 0,23 0.41 0.54 0,03 0.76 0.70 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 43.2 28.5 22.8 45A 30.5 25.7 35.2 35,3 32.8 32.8 32,2 Progression Factor 1,0'9 1.00 1.30 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.{10 Inc'ernental Delay, d2 8.8 4.9 0.8 F,.3 4-5 1.1 1.0 1,2 9,c 7.6 2.6 Delay (s) 52.0 33.1 216 51.7 35.0 26.8 36.2 37.5 32.8 40.4 34,7 Le'v'el of Service D C C LD C C C D C Appfuauh Delay `sl 33.7 33.7 36.8 36.7 Approach LA'S C C L' C tntatsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 34.5 HCM M level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.73 Actuated Cycle Length (s-) 00 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 Intersection Capacity Utiliaatim 74.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysts Period train) 15 c Gritical Lane Croup 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2039 PM WO I ROUtO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2721 Intersection ht FlyY s.veh 1.9 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions 384,4 0 r B t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 10 83 83 1228 1345 17 Future Vol, vehlh 14 83 83 1228 134: 17 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 4 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channeiized - Free - Nome - Ykk Storage Length 144 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Stuager # D - - 4 D Grade, % 0 - - 0 4 Peak Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 MAvint Flow 10 86 86 1266 1387 18 MajorUra Mincf2 Majorl MajoI Conflicting Flovu AJI 2825 1387 0 - 0 Stage 1 13$7 - _ - Stage 2 1438 - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 4.12 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 - Pol CW1 Mweuver 24 8 494 - Stage 1 232 0 - - 5lage 2 2.19 0 _ Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 17 - 494 - - - tJlav Cup -2 Maneuver 17 - - Stage 1 192 Stage 2 219 . Approach M N6 8B HGM Control Delay, s$ 384.4 0.9 4 HCM LOS F Mhor UrWmajor MMl,smnt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SBT SBR Capacity (veWh) 494 • 17 _ - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio D. 173 - 0.606 - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 19.8 384,4 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - IF A - - HCM 95th %file Q(veh) 0.6 - 1.6 Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWcifl Not Defined `. Afl major value lq platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2039 PM WO 4; ROLItE3 11 & I ludlalai Rd (South � 1 c12.2n21 Inlerseclion Inte.Ny s.veh i.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT LdnC- Gonligurations 0 12.9 - r T it $ - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) + Traffic Vol, vehrh 14 71 1248 4 61 1 359 Future Vol, vehlh 14 71 1248 4 61 1359 ConllicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Step Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Yieid - None Storage Lenglh fl 0 - - 0 - Veh in Median Starager # 0 - 0 - - li Grade. % fl - 0 - - 5 Peaak Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 7 2 3 2 a 2 MAvml Flow 14 73 1287 4 63 141 MajorillYll'im M11100 Ma]6r1 Maio, Conllic6ng Flaw AJI 2826 - 0 0 1267 0 Stage 1 1286 - - - - - Stage 2 1537 - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.47 - - 4.18 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.47 - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.47 - - Follow-up Hdwy IH3 - - 2.272 Poo Cap -1 Maneuver 19 0 - - 519 - Stage 1 252 0 - - 5lage 2 IN 0 _ _ - Platoon bluGied,'k - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 17 - - - 519 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuvar 17 - - - - Stage 1 252 - - Slage 2 1$7 . Appfoach M NO HGM Control Delay, s$ 469.2 (1 0.5 HCM LOS F Mhor Corm major MMlvmt Nf NBRWBL111BLrr2 SBL SBT Capacity (vehh) - - 17 - 519 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - 8.845 - 0.121 - MGM Contrd Delay (s) - -5469.2 0 12.9 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F it $ - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) - - 2.2 - D.4 - Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacky S: Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Afl major value ira platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Tin7ir(l,b 2039 PM WO b: Rc Lite I, & Puaptlaafrui St 1 12:71t`I ---W f- *--- t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT• SBIR Lane Configuratians + r t r Vi + ' ' + r Traffic Volume (vph) 199 23 115 50 23 104 105 913 58 142 1126 100 Future Volume (vph) 199 23 116 50 23 104 105 913 58 142 1126 100 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+p# NA Perm pm+p1 NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitbad Phases 4 4 a 8 2 2 6 6 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 1 n 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5,0 5.0 5,0' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 2Z5 2Z5 22.5 22.5 9,5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22,5 22.5 22,5 22,5 22,5 22,5 9.5 66.7 56,7 10.8 08,0 68,0 Total SPI it(%) 22.5% 22.5% 2-2.5% 22.594 22.5% 22.5% 9.5% 66.7% 66.7% 10.8% 68.0% 68.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 110 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tirt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Nor Max Max None Max Max Apt Eftct Green (s) 17.3 1 T.3 17.3 17.3 173 17.3 67.2 62.2 62.2 69.8 63.5 63.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.17 0.17 D.17 0.17 0.17 0,17 0.68 0,83 0.63 0.70 0,04 6.64 vie Ratio 0.90 0.08 03 0.22 0,06 0.30 0.70 0.81 O,06 0.55 0.97 0.10 Control Delay 78.6 34.9 9.1 37.7 34.9 9.6 38.0 21.7 1.9 12.6 39.5 1,9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.0 6.0 0.0 D.0 a.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 78.6 34.9 9.1 37.7 34.9 9.5 38.0 21,7 1,9 12.6 39,5 1,9 LOS E C A D C A D C A B 0 A App, cauh Letay 51.8 21.0 22.3 33.8 Approach LOS D 0 C C Intersection Summa C'yQle LE-ogll). 100 AcEu te�i Cycle Length. 99.3 Natural Cyde: 90 Control TyDe: Semi Ar- Wnooard Nlaximum We Ratio: 0.97 Inteiseclion Signal []alar+: 31,0 Intersec#Inn LOIS: C Inter tion Capacity Utilization 94,011,E ILLI Level of 5envice F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases:5: Route 11 & Puapuaarluist { 01 1 002 -00.4 05 06 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2039 PM WO 5: Route 11 & Puapuaanui St 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBI. EBT EBR WBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t iif I I + ji' � t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 199 23 116 50 23 104 145 913 58 142 1126 100 Future Volume {vehih) 199 23 116 50 23 104 105 913 58 142 1126 100 lniDal Q (0b), veto 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.04 Parking Bias. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.60 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 1$70 1626 1870 1856 1349 1870 1870 187 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 216 25 0 52 25 0 114 941 0 146 1161 Ci Peak Hour Factor €1.02 0.+92 0.92 4.97 0,92 0,97 0.92 0.97 0,97 0.97 0,97 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 3 4 2 2 2 Gap,vefii11 307 337 307 337 178 1178 314 1190 Arrive On Gt,Sen 0.18 0.15 0.00 0.18 0.18 -7.00 0.05 0.54 100 Q.05 0,84 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1386 1870 1585 1388 1870 1547 1751 1856 1560 1751 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vefifh 2161 25 G 52 25 0 114 941 0 146 1161 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),vehltiiln 1386 1870 1585 1386 18701 1547 1751 1856 1560 1781 1870 1555 Q Serves -s), s 15.3 1.1 D.G 12 1.1 0.0 2.2 37.5 OR 2.8 59.4 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 16.4 1.1 0.0 4.3 1,1 0.0 2.2 37.5 0.0 22 59,4 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.001 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.D0 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehtll7 307 337 307 337 178 1178 314 1194 VJC Ratio(X) 0.70 0.07 0.17 0.07 0.64 0.80 0.46 0.98 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 307 337 307 337 181 1176 339 1190 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.6{1 1.00 1.00 1.110 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.0➢t7 Uniform Delay (d), clveh 40.5 34.0 0.0 35.8 34.0 0.0 25.1 13.5 U 14.7 17.4 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 7.1 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 7.3 5.7 0,0 1.1 201.8 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirClftD(54°l9),vehfln 5,8 0.5 0,0 1,1 D.5 0.0 2.0 15.7 0.0 1.5 28.9 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),slviah 47.9 34.1 0.0 6.0 34.1 0.0 32.1' 19.2 0.0 15.8 38.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D C C B B D Apprcauh Vol, veil h 241 A 77 A 1055 A 1307 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 46.5 35.4 LU.B 35.7 Approach LCIS D D C D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 5 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.4 67.0 22.5 9.3 68.0 22.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Setting (Gmax}, s 6.3 62,2 18.0 5.0 63.5 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 4.8 39.5 18.4 4.2 61.4 6.3 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 8.1 Q.0 0.0 1.6 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 00,7 HCl`A 6th LOS C Nfltes U4er a0praveil pedestrian interval to be lass k ian phase max gieeii. Unal nalized Delay dor INBR, EPR, WSR, SBR) is excluded from calculaGvns of the approach delay and inlersection delay. 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2039 PM WO 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakim Stroot 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht Fly)' s•veh 7.9 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions H M 95th %file 0(veh) r t + r Traffic Vol, v&Vh 0 325 340 1082 1259 0 Future Vol, vehih 0 325 340 1682 1259 0 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - YWd Storage Length 184 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade. % C - - 0 4 - Peaak Hour Faclar 98 96 98 98 98 98 Heavy Veh?cies, % 5 2 2 3 2 6 MAvint Flow 0 332 347 1104 1285 0 majorlKha W02, Ma]6r1 ftr2 Conllicbng Flaw AJI 3OB3 - 1285 0 - 0 Stage 1 1265 - - - Stage 2 1798 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.49 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.48 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.48 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 - 2.218 - - - Pol CW1 Maneuver 1.3 0 540 Stage 1 252 6 - - 5lage 2 140 0 - Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 5 - 549 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 5 - Stage 1 Stage 2 940 _ Appfoach m N9 HGM Control Delay, s 0 5.5 G HCM LOS A mhor UrWmajor MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 540 HGM Lane V.'C Rollo 0.642 - - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 22.9 - 0 D HGNI Lane LDS C - A it - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) 4.5 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tinilr-gs 2039 PM "10 (; Rc Lite} 1 & -�iko Strr ; t 1 12:2721 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1� ' T4 ' + r t Traffic Volume (vph) 113 30 52 39 37 1010 64 200 1153 188 Future Volume (vPh) 143 31) 52 39 37 1016 64 200 1153 188 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 9.5 22.5 2.2.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 88.0 08.0 1M 95.5 95.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 15.D% 15.0% 15.0% 6.30 58.7'9 58.7°x6 11.3N10 63.7% 637% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None Norse None None None FA ax Max None Max Max Act Effct Careen (s) 16.0 10.0 15.1 15.1 88.7 83.7 83.7 100.7 93.2 93.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.10 0,61 0.58 0.58 0.69 0.64 0.64 vie Ratio 0.78 0.36 0.36 0,90 0;35 1.00 0.07 1.03 1.01 0.19 Central Delay 90,0 35.2 66.4 59.2 19,7 58.1 0.5 114.2 56.5 6.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 90.0 35.2 66.4 58.2 18.7 58.1 0.5 114.2 50,13 5.0 LOS F to E E E E A F E A Apprcauh Delay 70.7 60,6 53.5 58.0 Approach LOS E E D E Intersection Summa C+Qle Leoplh. 150 Actualeo Cycle Length; 145.3 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type; ,Actuared-Unaoordinaled Nlaximum 0c Ratio:1.03 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay; 57.6 Intersectlon LOS E IntersDdon Capacity Utilization 103,8% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street �! 01 1'`02 -"V4 f8 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 13 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2039 PM WCC T; Route 11 & Lake Street 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. EBT EBR >1WBL W'BT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 T V t T r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 143 30 48 62 39 218 37 1016 64 200 1163 188 Future Volume ;vehih) 143 30 48 62 39 218 37 1016 64 200 1163 188 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 G 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.a0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1626 1626 1055 1656 1870 1656 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 149 31 0 65 41 0 39 1058 0 208 1211 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.95 4.96 0,96 0,96 0.0 0,96 4,96 0.96 0,96 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 176 187 92 94 153 1222; 259 1280 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.1;3 0.00 0.05 0.05 0.00 0,43 0.66 O.CC 0.05 0,68 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1555 1767 1670 1555 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 149 31 G 65 41 0 39 1058 0 208 1211 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 11,1 2,0 D.G 4.8 2.9 4.0 0.11 60.3 U-0 5.0 ?711 0,0 Cycle 07 dear(g_cj, 5 11.1 2.0 a,0 4.8 2,9 0.0 0.9 60.3 0,0 5.0 77,1 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.DO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehdh 176 187 92 94 153 17.22 259 1264 VJC Ratio(X) 0.85 0,17 0.71 0.44 0.26 0.97 0.84 0.95 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 237 253 241 247 168 1222 329 1280 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,x 1.00 1.013 1.110 1.Q0 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.174 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 58.5 54.8 0.0 62 1 61.2 0.0 29.0 18.0 O.0 28.2 1$,9 0,0 her Delay (d2). slveh 18.6 0.4 0.0 S.5 3.1 0.0 0.9 8.4 H 10.7 15.2 0.13 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehrfln 5,9 1,0 0.0 2,A 1.4 0.0 0.8 25.8 0.0 5.3 35.5 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 77.6 55.2 0.0 71A 64.3 0.0 29.9 25:4 0.0 38.9 34.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E E E C C D C Apprcauh Vol, vett h 180 A 106 A 1097 A 1419 A Approach Delay, s veh 73.7 65.8 34.7 Approach LCIS E E C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.7 92.1 17.8 8.3 95.5 11.4 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 12.5 83.5 18.0 5.0 91.4 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 7.0 62.3 13.1 2.9 79.1 6.8 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.3 9.5 0:2 0.0 7.9 0.2 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 35.a HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Tin7ir4l,b 2039 FM VIVO 8. Rc�lte} 1 Cr>I�v >Ilr�ll�a IIP Road11:12,2021 Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: 6, Houle 11 & Karn an aMeMa $11 Koacl as vas fl �� tCDs 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 •4- t i Large Group EBT EER WBT N'BL NBT 59L S6T Lane Configuratians 4 r 4 1 T +�, Traffic Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 663 19 B82 Future Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 663 19 682 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot HA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 1 3 8 7 4 Permibd Phases 2 Qetectad Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 317.0 9,5 23.5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.5 30.5 30 G 12.0 43.5 11.0 42.5 Total SPI rt(%) 26.5% 26.5° 26.10 10.4% 37.8% 9.+6% 37.0°, Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{3 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 4.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Nene None Max None Max Act Effut Green (s) 22.7 27.7 6.9 73 44.5 63 30.4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.26 4.26 0. G9 0,08 0.51 0.07 0.45 vie Ratio 0.77 0.12 0.26 0:46 0.75 0.15 0.67 Control Delay 44.1 1.7 29.8 52.9 28.0 45.8 22.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 6.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 44.1 1.7 29.$ 52.9 25.0 45,8 22.8 LOS D A C 0 C FD C App, cauh Delay 38.4 29,B 30.2 23.3 Approeah LOS D C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 86,9 Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Llncoord Maximum We Rano: O.T7 Inteiseclian Signal Delay; 28.4 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter eon 1aa mdty Utilization 76.21A ICU Level of 5eNce D Analysis Period (min) 15 lits and Phases: 6, Houle 11 & Karn an aMeMa $11 Koacl as vas fl �� tCDs 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 FIC;Pr1 6:11 Sir;rtalizod Ir-tt�rsoctiorl Surilnla-y 2,.'J39 I'M 'NO 8; ROUte 1 Ill Road 1 ` If 2721 EBL > EBR 1NBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations 2 4 r 6 :k B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 1� 8.5 '� 7.5 6.3 Traffic Volume (vehfh) 325 11 52 7 11 20.1 64 653 11 19 652 316 Future Volume ;vehih) 325 11 52 7 11 20 64 653 11 19 682 316 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 tntefseclion Summary 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.0o 1.00 1.00 1.90 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1,00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 1856 1767 1B11 1870 1$70 1870 18556 1856 1870 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 342 12 D 7 12 21 67 698 12 20 718 0 Peak Hour Factor €,1.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0,95 0,95 195 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 D.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 9 5 t 2 2 3 ? 2 2 2 2 Gap, vehlh 392 14 11 18 32 86 BG 15 40 1626 Arrive On Gruen 0.24 0.24 O.QO 0,04 0.04 •0.04 0.05 0.48 0A8 Q.02 0,46 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1628 57 1535 297 509 890 1767 1819 31 1781 3647 0 Grp Volume(v . vehfh 354 D Pr 40 0 0 67 0 710 20 718 0 Grp Bat Flovv(s),veh!hiln 1685 0 1535 1695 4 0 1767 0 1850 1781 1777 0 Q Servefs-s), s 115.$ 0.0 O.Q 1.9 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 26.7 0.9 11.4 O -Q Cycle 00 clear(g_c), s 16.8 0.0 H 1.9 0,0 0.0 3.1 a.0 26,7 0.9 11,4 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.00 0.17 0.52 1-00 0.02 U00 0.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 406 0 62 0 0 86 D 895 40 1626 VJC Ratio(X) 0.87 0.00 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0,79 0_50 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 528 0 520 0 0 160 0 895 13'9 1$26 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.001 1.00 0.00 1.010 1.00 1.00 13.@0 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 30.3 0.0 0.0 39.5 0.0 0.0 39,1 4.0 18.0 40.2 15.3 0.0 Mor Delay (d2). siveh 121 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 0.0 7.2 9.6 0.9 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 7.9 0.0 0.0 1.0 0,0 0.0 1.6 0.0 11,4 0.5 41 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 42,4 0.0 0.0 50,5 0.0 0.0 53.1 0.4 2.5.1 49.7 16.2 0.0 LnGrp LOS C A D A A D A C D B Appfcauh Vol, veil h 354 A 40 777 738 A Approach Delay, s1ve , 42.4 50.5 27.5 17.1 Approach LOS 0 D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 24.5 8.5 42.5 7.5 6.3 44.7 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 7.5 38.0 25.5 6.5 39.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9-c+1 1). s 18,8 5.1 13.4 3,9 2,9 28.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 1.2 0.0 4,7 0.1 0.0 3.2 tntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 26.? HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar) delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 Appendix Analysis Reports — Future With Project Conditions (2039) Tin1ir.gs 203"1 AM VV t Falaili Rd & RoLlte 11 1 �c 12 2721 -',, moi► f-- *-- 4``. 4i Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians M tt M tt e ++ r ' tt r Traffic Volume (vph) 71 597 21B 166 996 42 243 192 118 22 321 177 Future Volume (vph; 7't 597 218 166 906 42 243 192 118 22 321 177 Turn Type 'rot NA Perm. Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 5 Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9.5 38.5 38,5 95 38.5 36,5 9.5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 10.0 39.0 39,G 14.0 43.0 43,0 17.0 51.8 51,8 10.2 45,0 45.0 Total SPI €t(%) 8.7% 33.9% 33.9% 12.2% 37A% 37,4% 14.8% 45.0°lo 45.0% 8.9% 39,1% 39.1% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{3 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.G 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None Nave Nave None Act Effct Green (s) 5.6 36.2 35.2 &9 40.9 40.9 11.1 29.1 29.1 5.7 17.1 17.1 Actuated grO Ratio O.OG 0.39 0.39 0,10 0.45 0.45 0.12 0.32 0.32 0.06 0.19 0.19 vie Ratio 0.37 0.47 0.32 0,51 HO 0.05 0.60 0.17 0,21 0.20 0.49 0.43 Control Delay 50.3 24.3 4.0 46,8 23.6 0.1 45.9 22.9 5.3 49.4 34.7 10.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 L,O 0.13 11.0 Total Delay 50.3 24.3 4,9 110.8 23.0 0.1 45.9 22.9 5.3 49.4 34.7 1U.6 LOS D C A D G A D C A D C B App, cauh Letay 2.1.6 26,2 29.3 27.2 Appro�uh LOS C 0 C C Intersection Summa C+yCle Lei glth:115 Actuated Cycle Length; 90.6 Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type; Semi Act-Un000rd Nlaximum u c Rana: 0.60 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 25.6 Intersectlan LOIS: C Interaon Capacity Utilization 63.3% ILLI Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 1; Palani Rd & Route 11 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Intersection Sun-tma{y 2039 AM VV 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 arrrent EBL EBT EBR 'WBL dlBT VVBR NEL Na MR SEL f SIS Lane Configurations M tt r tt ++ r Traffic Volume (veWh) 71 537 218 166 906 42 243 192 118 22 321 177 Future Volume ;vehlh) 71 597 218 166 906 42 243 192 118 22 321 177 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 4 G 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 17J7 1767 1797 1$41 1811 1841 1841 1870 1856 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rake,. vehlh 72 609 D 169 924 0 248 198 0 22 328 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.96 0.98 0,08 0.98 U8 0.9a 0,98 0.98 0,38 0,98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 11 9 11 4 6 4 4 2 3 2 2 2 Cap, vehlh 160 1542 251 1662 340 771 43 501 Arrive On Green 0.05 0.46 0.00 0.07 04 •0.00 0.10 0.22 0.00 0.02 -D.14 0.00 Sat Fiotia, veh h 3209 3357 1472 3401 3441 1560 3401 3554 1572 1781 3554 1 585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 72 609 G 169 924 0 246 190 C'+ 22 328 0 Grp Sat F7cvv(s),veh!hiln 1605 1678 1472 1700 1721 1550 1700 1777 1572 1781 1777 1555 Q Serves -s), s 17 9-5 0 0 3.9 15.1 0.0 a.6 3-> 0.0 1.0 TO 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 1.7 9.6 0.0 3.9 15,1 0.0 5.6 3.6 0,0 1.0 7.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.b0 1.00 1.00 1.40 1,04 1.00 1.D0 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 16+0 1542 251 1662 340 771 43 501 VIC Ratio(X) 0.45 0.40 0.67 0.56 0.73 0.25 0,51 0.65 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 221 1542 405 1662 530 2109 127 18{D 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,x 1,00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstrearn Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.D4 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 36.5 14.2 0.0 3&0 14,6 4.0 34.8 25.9 0.0 38.4 32.4 0,0 Mor Delay (d2). s7veh 2.0 0.8 0.4 3.1 1.3 0.0 10 0.2 0,0 9.0 1.6 U In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh U 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehfln 0.7 3.5 0.0 1.7 5.6 0.0 2.4 1.5 4.0 0.5 3.0 10 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 38,7 15.0 0.0 39.1 15.9 0.0 37.8 26.4 0.0 47.5 33.9 17.0 LnGrp LOS D B D B D C D C Appfcauh Vol, veli h 681 A 1093 A 444 A 350 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 17.5 19.5 32.6 34.7 Approach LOS B B C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B PAs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 6.4 21.8 10.4 41.1 12.5 15.7 8.5 43.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.7 47.3 9.5 34,5 12.5 40.5 5.5 38.5 Max 0 Clear Time (9_c+i1), s 3.0 5.6 5.9 11,8 7.6 9.0 3.7 17.1 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 1.3 0.2 4.1 0.4 2.3 0.0 6.6 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th Ctrl Delay 23.3 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2039 AM W 2: Henry St & Routo 11 1V12.202'I t Large Group EBL EBT EBR WK WST WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SHT Lane Configuratians �1 tt r +'+ 0 ' 4T Traffic Volume (vph) 10T 48B 124 61 832 545 146 337 48 412 339 Future Volume (vphj 107 468 124 61 832 545 146 337 48 412 339 Turn Type Prot NA Perm. Prot NA Porm Split NA Perm so NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitbad Phases 4 8 2 Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 2 2 2 6 n Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9.5 30.5 30,5. 9,5 30.5 30.5 35.5 35.5 35,5 35,5 35,5 Total Split (s) 10.0 33.4 33.4 10,1 33,5 33,5 36.0 36,0 36.0 35.5 35.5 Total SPI it(%) 8.7°x6 29.0% 29.0'A 8.8% 29.1°; 29.1% 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 30.9° 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.3 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.o 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 LeadLag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Nene None Nnile None Aot Eflut Green (s) 5.6 31,8 31.8 5.7 29.8 29.5 17.8 17.8 17,8 24.8 24.8 Actuated grC Ratio O.OG 0.33 D.33 0.06 0,31 0.31 0.19 0.19 0.15 0.26 0.26 vie Ratio 0.61 0.46 0.22 0,32 0.62 0.65 6.47 0.58 0.14 0.73 9.71 Control Delay 82.8 30.5 H 52.3 40.6 6.9 40.9 39.8 0.8 44.7 36,5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 O.a 0.0 0.4 0.0 Total delay 62.8 34.5 6.a 52,3 40.6 6,9 40,9 39 8 0.8 44.7 36,5 LOS E C A D D A 0 D A D a App, cauh Decay 31.2 28.4 36.5 39.3 ApprGeah LOS C 0 D 1) Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 96 Naterai Cyde: 115 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: O.82 Inteiseclion Signal Delay: N 8 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersection Capaci#y Utilizaton 71,1% ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits rnand Phases: 2: HenrySt & RaIUW 111 + IJi 7 1L+h7 WJ 04 07 03 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lntesection Capacity Analysts 2039 AM VV 2. Henry St & Route 11 1 U12.202'I "arneiit EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR fNBL NBT IBR SBL SBT SBFT Lane Configurations M tt r M tt 1 4+ r ii 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 107 488 124 61 832 545 146 337 48 412 339 124 Future Volume (vph) 107 488 124 61 832 545 146 337 48 412 339 124 Ideal Flow (vphpl) I'm 1900 19003 19413 1900 19000 1900 19N 1900 190€1 191}0 1900 Total Lost lime (s) 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane 4ltil, Factcar 0,97 0.95 1.!}0 0.97 4.95 1.00 Q.91 9.81 1.00 0.91 0,91 Frpb, ped;bikes 1,00 1.00 Q.99 1,00 1,00 0,99 1,44 1.0ti 0,55 1.00 1,00 Flpb, pedibikes 1.00 1.00 1,00 1100 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1,00 Frt 1.047 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 0.85 1,00 0,97 FIt Proteded 0,95 1,00 1. DO 0.95 1.00 1,001 0.95 1,01} UQ 0.95 0,9s Saud, Flaw (protf 3099 3282 1516 3303 3406 1548 1564 3348 1467 1595 3175 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1 M 0.95 1.00 1.030 0.95 0.99 Satd. Flow ' errr' 3099 3282 15101 3303 3406 1548 1554 3348 1487 1595 3175 Peat[ -hour factor, Pict= 0.97 0_97 17.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow(Yph) 110 573 128 63 858 582 151 347 49 428 349 128 RTOR Reductkxr (vph ) 0 0 86 0 0 385 0 0 40 0 20 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 110 503 42 63 858 177 136 352 9 302 580 0 Confl. Peds. (Nhr} 2 2 4 3 3 4 Confl. Bikes (R?hr) 1 HeavyVehides.�Xoo. _ 13% 10°5 5% 6% 6% 3'r6 5% 3% 7% 3% 4% 5% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Peau split NA Perm SPA NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 a 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 8 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 5,6 31.8 31.8 4.3 30.5 30.5 17,8 17.8 17.8 24.8 24.8 Effective Green, g (s) 5.6 31.8 31.8 4,3 30,5 30.5 17.8 17.8 17.8 24.8 24,8 Actuated g C natio 0.06 0.33 0.33 0,04 0,32 0,32 0.18 0,18 0,18 0126 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 41.5 V'ehde Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3,0 3.13 3.0 16 141 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph} 170 1079 45t3 140 1074 4S8 28' 616 273 409 814 v+s Ratio Prot ct1.04 0.15 102 c4.25 0.09 047.11 00.19 0.18 Vs Ratio Perm 07,03 0.11 0.01 Oc: Ratio 0,61 0-47 HE 0,43 0,80 0.36 0.47 0.59 0,03 034 +0.71 Uniform DF-4ay, d1 44,5 15.7 22.4 45.0 30.3 25,8 35.3 365 1 32.4 33,0 323 Progression Factor 9,00 1.00 1.30 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M Inc'emental Delay, d2 6.1 7.4 0.3 2.0 6.2 2.1 1.2 1A 0.0 6.8 M Delay (s) 50,6 27.2 22.7 47.1 36.5 27,7 36.5 37.5 32.4 39.8 35.7 Le'v'el of Service D C C D D C D D C D D Appfua; th Delay Is1 29.9 33,6 36.8 87.1 Approach LA'S C C L' D tntersection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 34.2 HCM 7000 Levet of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.72 Actuated C be Length (s-) 961 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 intersection Capacity Utilization 71.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysts Period (miry) 15 c Grttical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2039 AM W I ROUtO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht 11"09Y s.veh 3" . 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions $?163.6 0 r B t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 44 55 171 1389 1053 30 Future Vol, vehih 44 55 171 1389 1053 30 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nene - YAd Storage Length 140 0 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Stuager # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor g3 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 6 2 MAvint Flow 47 �9 184 1494 1132 32 Mejorwa Miner2 Majbr1 majol Conllicbng Flovu AJI 2995 1133 0 0 Stage 1 1133 - - - - - Stage 2 13612 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - 2.218 - - - Pol CW 1 Maneuver -15 0 617 Stage 1 307 0 - - 5lage 2 135 0 Platoon blocied, ''k - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver -11 - 516 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar -11 - Stage 1 215 Stage 2 135 Amomh ED so HCM Control Delay, X2163,6 1,5 0 HCM LOS F Mhor Uriie major MMl,Smnt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SBT SBR Capacity (vehh) 616 11 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0,298 4.301 - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 13.3 $?163.6 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F A - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 1.2 - 7.1 Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S: Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWcifl Not Defined `. Afl major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2039 AM W 4: Route 11 & Hualalai Rd (South) 1111212021 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.v9h movemeni 1.9 Y4'BL WBIR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonrigurations Stage 1 r T - - - Stage 2 t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 9 140 1422 15 73 1026 Future Vol, vehlh 9 140 1,122 15 73 1026 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 ii 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - 'Yield - None Storage Lenglh fl 0 - - 0 - Veh in Median Starager # 0 - 6 - - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 Peaak Hour Faelor K 93 93 93 9S 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 13 6 5 MAvinl Flow 10 151 1529 16 76 1103 Maiormhof Minal MOM Maim Conllicbng Flaw AJI 2796 0 0 1529 0 Stage 1 1537 - - - - - Stage 2 1259 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 65.42 - - 4.15 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 - - - 2.254 - Pol CW1 Maneuver 24 0 - - 424 - Stage 1 195 0 - - Slage 2 267 a Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver 16 - - - 424 - ttrlav Cop -2 Maneuvar 16 - - Stage 1 195 Stage 2 218 Approxh W5 N6 8B HGM Contra Delay, s S 414 0 1 HCM LOS F Mhor LarWi41aior MMlvmt NBT NBRWBLnIWBLnZ S8L SBT Capacity (veWh) - 16 - 424 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - 0.605 - 0.185 - MGM Contrd Delay (s) - - $444 0 15,4 - HCtwf Lane LDS - F A C HCM 95th °Mlle Q(veh) - - 1.6 - D.7 - Nctas Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Afl major value ira platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 14 Report Page 8 Tinlir(l,b 2031" AM b., RUUtC 1' & P1,laPL1aallUl St 1I, 12,2021 "I" t -01 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SOL SBT SEIR Lane Configurations t r I t + + r Traffic Volume (vph) 193 9 75 112 59 140 104 1090 27 43 921 68 Future Volume (vph) 193 9 75 112 59 140 104 1090 27 43 921 68 Turn Type Perris NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 4 4 a 8 2 2 6 5 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 2 t n {a Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.a 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 23,5 22,5 22.5 22.5 9,5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 2.2.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 22,5 9,15 63'a 68,0 9.5 07.9 67,9 Total SPI it(%) 22.5% 22.5% 2-2.5% 22.594 22.5% 22.5% 9.6% 68.0% 68.0% 9.5% 67,9% 6T.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tirne (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1e0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1,0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yea Yes Yes Recall Mode None N,)qe Nine None None None Nor Max Max None Max Max Aat Eflut Green (s) 17.4 17.4 17.4 17.4 17.4 17.4 70.4 07.3 67,3 68.4 63.4 63,4 Actuated grC Ratio 0.15 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.18 0.71 0.68 0.68 0,69 0.64 6.64 vie Rabo 0.90 0.03 0.24 0.49 0.201 0.37 0.47 0.53 H3 0.29 0.85 0.07 Control Delay 80.1 34.2 10.1 44.5 36.7 8.9 10.8 30.2 0.3 8.6 23.5 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 (1.0 0.0 0.0 010 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 Total Delay 50,1 34.2 10.1 44.6 36.7 5,9 10.6 30.2 0,3 8.6 23.5 1.9 LOS F C B D D A B C A A G A Appicauh Le!ay 59.6 27.0 27.9 21.4 Approach LOS E 0 C C Intersection Summa C�ole Lea qlh. 100 AQW,91keq Cycle Length 99.4 Natural Cyte: 100 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum, u c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay28.6 Intersectlan LOIS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 90,1% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page* 9 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Sun-lmi+ary 2039 AAAI VV 5; Route 111 & Puapuaanui St 11112-2021 --*� , '� "• I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t r I t t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 193 9 75 112 59 140 104 1090 27 43 921 68 Future Volume ;wehlh) 193 9 75 112 59 1140 104 1090 27 43 921 68 Initial Q (02b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1 -CIO 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,a0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.010 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 9$70 1870 1870 1850 1870 1870 1826 1870 Adj Ebur Rake, vehlh 310 10 0 119 64 0 113 1150 0 46 980 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.D2 0.94 0,92 0,94 192 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,94 G.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 ? 2 2 5 2 Cep. vehlh 275 338 320 338 281 1232 166 1161 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.15 0.00 0.18 0.18 0.110 0.05 0.55 11.00 0.04 3.54 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1338 1870 1595 1405 1870 1585 1151 1855 1585 1781 1826 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 210 10 G 119 54 D 113 11G0 D 46 P80 0 Grp Sat F7cw(s),veh!hiln 1338 1870 1585 1405 1870 1585 1781 1856 1585 1781 1826 1555 Q Serve{s_5), s 15.1 0.4 D.G 7.6 2.9 0.0 2.1 58.5 U-0 0.9 42.0 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 18.0 DA 0.0 8.0 2,9 0.0 2.1 58.5 OX 0.9 42.0 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 Laie Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 275 338 324 338 281 12D2 166 11£1 VJC Ratio(X) 0.76 0.03 0.37 0.19 0.40 0.H 0.28 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 275 338 320 338 286 1202 191 1161 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,x 1.00 1.00 1.110 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.174 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 42.5 33.6 0.0 07.0 34.7 0.0 16.3 16.5 U 23.7 14.3 0,0 her Delay (d2). slveh 12.0 0.0 O,a 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.9 18.8 0.0 0.9 7.6 0.0 In!r at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 6.0 0.2 4,D 2.7 1.3 0.0 1.3 27.8 0.0 0.7 17,7 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 54.5 33.7 H 371 34.9 0.0 17.3 35.3 0.0 24.6 21.9 10 LnGrp Los D C D C B D C C Approauh Vol, veb!h 220 A 183 A 1273 A 1026 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 53.6 36.7 33.7 21.9 Approach LOS D D C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 69.1 22.5 9.3 67.9 22.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 5.0 63.5 1610 5.1 63,4 1$.D Max 0 Clear Time (g_c+11), s 2.9 130.5 20.0 4.1 44.0 10.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,0 2.2 U 0.0 8.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 31,1 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed frorn cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 11 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2039 AM W 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakin� Stroc,,t 1 c12.2n21 Intersection lit Fl yY s.veh 1 7." 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) r Nctfs t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 159 605 1060 1056 2 Future Vol, vehlh 0 159 606 X060 1056 2 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channeiazed - Free - Nome - Ykk Storage Length 160 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stuager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 4 - Peaak Hour Faclor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 4 2 5 5 7 MAvint Flow 0 171 651 1140 1135 2 Majormlrw Mino(2 MOM Woo Conflicting FlGvv AJI 3,977 1135 0 0 Stage 1 1136 - - - - - Stage 2 2442 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy BA2 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Maneuver 6 0 —616 - - - Stage 1 307 0 - - Slage 2 68 0 Platoon bluGied, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - —616 - - - tAGv Cup -2 Maneuvar 0 - Stage 1 0 - - - - - Approach NO S� HGM Control Delay, s 0 23.2 6 HCM LOS A Minor Uriie major MMlvmt NBL NBT EBLrr1 EBW 'SBT SBR Capacity (vehh) —616 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 1.056 - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 7.6 - 0 D HGNI Lane LDS F - A A - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 17.9 - - Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWcifl Not Defined `. Ara] major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseaine Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tin7irtl,b 2031" AM (; ROLL te} 1 & -cko Strr t lL&ko S€raet 1 12;2021 -,,, .--W ! Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL. NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1 T4 ' + r t ' Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 1467 55 184 896 146 Future Volume ,vphj 283 48 85 39 33 1067 55 164 896 146 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 8 a 5 2 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 4 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 27.0 25,0 25.0 9,5 55.0 85.0 1.3.4 88,5 85.5 Total SPI €t(%) 18.0% 18.D% 16.7% 16.7% 6.3% 56.79 56.7% 8.7% 59.0% 59.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Gptirnlze? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None Aare Ncne Nave None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 22.5 22.5 20.5 20.5 85.5 80.5 81).5 92.7 95.9 B5.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.14 0.14 0.57 0.54 0.54 0.62 0.57 0.57 vie Raba 1.14 4.43 0.38 1.16 028 1.14 0.07 1.22 0.90 0.16 Control Delay 152.1 44.0 64.1 139.7 16.8 106.9 2.1 177.4 41.9 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 G,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 152.1 44.0 64.1 139.7 1G.8 106.9 2.1 177.4 41,9 6.5 LOS F to E F B F A F 0 A Apprcauh Letay 120.5 124.8 99.3 56.0 Apprc,ach LOS F F F E Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuale�! Cyde Length. 150 Natural Cyde: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.22 Intersectian Signal Nlay, 89.0 Intersectlan LCIS F Inter tion Capacity tJtiiliaaton 116,E ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street L" t T02 I A4 a �L - 5:00 pm baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 13 HCM 6th Signalized Intc--rsoction SUn-ima{y 2939 AM VV T; Route 11 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 lH7 55 164 896 145 Future Volume ;vehih) 283 46 69 85 39 305 33 1867 55 164 896r 146 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 U 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.04 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.DO 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} I.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1,80 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.88 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Rove, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1856 3870 1870 1810 1870 1441 1611 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 4.94 0.94 4,94 0.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Cap, vehlh 285 303 119 126 221 1094 157 1140 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.00 0,07 0,07 4.114 0.03 0.58 U OC 0.06 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1728 1858 1595 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1747 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 22.5 3.3 0,0 6,9 2.9 0.0 1.1 80.5 4.0 8.5 56.5 0,0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, s 22.5 3.3 0.0 8.9 2.9 0.0 1.1 80.5 0.0 8,5 56.5 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.04 1.40 0,00 1.00 1,40 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 289 803 419 126 221 1084 157 1140 VJC Ratio(X) 1.04 0,17 0.76 0.33 0,16 1.05 1,11 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 289 303 261 276 238 1484 157 1144 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.0{1 1,00 10 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 11.017 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 582 50.1 0.0 616 61.7 0.0 21.2 29.2 0,0 48.4 21.2 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 64.6 0.3 0.0 $.3 1.5 0.0 0.3 40.4 0.0 102.7 7.3 0.0 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.1) +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacic=(54°l9),vehfln 15.3 1.6 0.0 3,4 1.4 4.(1 D.5 46.6 0.0 7.6 25.8 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),siveh 122.7 50.4 0.0 73.0 63.2 0.0 21.6 69.6 0.0 150.7 28.6 11.0 LnGrp LOS F D E E C F F C Approach Vol, vett h 352 A 131 A 1170 A 1127 A Approach Delay, s�ve , 11'x.3 c .9 68.1 47,4 Approach LOS F E E L Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rq s 130 85.0 27.0 8.2 89.8 13.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8.5 811.5 22.5 5.0 84.0 20.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 10.5 82.5 24.5 3.1 58.5 8.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,0 0.0 010 0.0 8.7 0.3 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay HChA 6th LOS E Notes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Pagh 15 Timings 2039 ANI W 8, Kamehameha III Road & Route 11 11112f2021 Analysis Period [min) 15 IAS and Phases: 6. Kamenarneha III Koaa Koute 11 as I V06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 -11111. t Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NBT 8BL SIIT Lane CDnfieuratians 4 r 4:4 1 T + Traffic Volume (vph) 5 26 12 76 054 16 581 Future Volume (vph) 5 26 12 Ifs 654 16 581 Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot NA Prot NA Protecled Phases 2 6 3 8 7 4 Permibd Phases 2 Qetectod Phase 2 2 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 9,5 23.5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.5 30.5 30,0 11.9 45,0 9.5 43.6 Total SPI €t(%) 26.5% 26.5° 26.1% 10.3% 39.1° 6.39 37.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.6 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 760 1.0 I'D 1:0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Gptiirnlze? Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None Max None Max Act Eff.t Green (s) 1511 15.1 7.3 7.5 47.4 5.1 38.8 Actuated grC Ratio 0.18 0.18 0.G9 0.09 0.58 0,08 0.47 vie Raba 0.64 0.08 0.29 0,55 0;70 0.16 0.63 Control Delay 41.8 0.5 31.9 54.8 22.0 44.8 18.5 Queue Delay 0.0 Q.O 17.0 Do 6.0 0.4 D.0 Total aolay 41.8 4.5 31,9 54.8 22,0 44,tj 18,5 LOS D A C 0 C Q B App, cauh De!ay 36.8 31.9 25.4 19.0 Approe5h LOS D C 0 8 Intersection Summary Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 82,E Naturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-Llncoord Maximum We Ra#o: 0.70 Inteisecllan Signal Delay: 23.7 Intersectlan LOS: C Intertian Capacity Utilization 137.81, ILLI Level of Service C Analysis Period [min) 15 IAS and Phases: 6. Kamenarneha III Koaa Koute 11 as I V06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Reporl Page 16 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Surnmary 2939 AM VV 8; Kamehameha Ill Road & ROL& 11 11112.202'1 I'4layament EBL EBT EBF WBL VVBT Vdl3R, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 r 1 14 �i +1� Traffic Volume (veWh) 182 5 26 16 12 17 76 554 15 16 581 334 Future Volume {vehih) 182 5 25 16 i2 17 76 654 15 16 581 334 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.04 0.95 1-40 0.88 1.40 1,00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.40 1.010 1.D0 1,00 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1811 1870 1722 1874 1781 17D6 1752 1811 1870 1870 1811 1811 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 196 5 D 17 13 1a 82 7D3 16 17 625 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 OX 8.93 0,93 0,83 0.93 0 93 0,93 0.03 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 6 2 12 2 8 7 10 6 2 2 6 5 Cep. vehlh 256 7 24 18 25 103 97D 22 35 1750 Arrive On Gruen 0.15 0.15 O.D4 0.04 0,94 9.44 10,06 0.55 U,55 0.92 :i.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1739 44 1459 569 435 603 1668 1763 40 1781 3532 0 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 201 0 D 48 0 D 82 0 719 17 625 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1783 0 1459 1608 0 04 1668 0 1803 1781 1721 0 Q Servefs_s), s 8.1 4.9 0.0 2.2 0.0 0.0 8.6 0.0 22.3 0,7 B.2 0.0 Cycle fD dear(g_c), 5 8.1 0,0 0.0 2.2 0,0 0.0 3.6 0.0 22..3 0.7 8,2 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.98 1.00 0.35 0.37 1.00 0.02 1.00 0 -CIO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 262 0 68 0 0 403 D 992 35 1750 VJC Ratio(X) 0.77 HO 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.80 0.00 0.72 0,48 0.36 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 619 0 547 0 0 165 D 992 119 1750 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,OD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0. DO 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1, DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 30.7 0.0 0.0 35.4 0.0 0.0 34.7 17.0 12.6 36.3 11.1 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 4.6 0.0 0.4 12.7 0.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 4.6 9.7 0.5 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),siveh O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfOftD(54°l9),vehfln 17 OA 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 8.2 0.4 2.7 0,0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 35.3 0.0 0.0 48.1 0.0 0.0 47.5 0.4 17.2 46.1 11,6 0,0 LnGrp LOS D A D A A D A B D B Appfcauh Vol, veil h 201 A 48 801 642 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 35.3 48.1 20.3 12,5 Approach LOS D D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 3 4 6 7 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rq s 15.5 9.1 42.6 7.7 6.0 45.7 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4,6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 7.4 38.1 25.5 5.0 40.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_c+11), s 10,1 5.6 10.2 4.2 2,7 24.3 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 1.0 0.0 4.1 0,2 0.0 4.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay X9.5 HCl`A 6th LOS 0 N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 HCM 6th TWSC 2039 AM W 9. Route 11 & Royal Vistas 1111212021 Iniefseclion Int movemem F" AIBL WBR. NBT NBR SBL SBT Ldno Gon figural ions Stage 1 r t r Slage 2 t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 2-9 108 1060 2~r 22 'C133 Future Vol, vehih 29 108 1060 25 22 1033 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Y6ld - y'lefd - None Storage Length fl 0 - 500 1500 - Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 - - 0 Pic Hour Faclar 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MAvint Flow 32 117 1152 27 24 1123 Majcrym WPM Majcr1 Major2 Conllictrng Flaw AJI 2323 1152 0 0 1152 0 Stage 1 1152 - - - - - Slage 2 117t - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6A2 6.22 - - 4.12 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.31$ - - 2.218 Poo CW1 Mar mver 41 241 - 6D6 - Stage 1 301 Slage 2 295 - - _ - - Platoon bluG�ed, % - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver 39 241 - 606 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuvar 39 - Slage 1 3171 Stage 2 283 . . Approach W9 N6 so HCM Control Delay, s 77.6 0 0.2 HCM LOS F Mhor LarWmajor MMlvmt NBT NBRWBLAlWBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 39 241 606 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - - 0.808 0.487 0.039 - MCM Control Delay (s) - - 242.4 33.3 11.2 - HCtwf Lane LDS - IF B B HCM 95th %file 0(veh) - - 3 .2.5 0.1 - 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 19 Tin7ir(lS 2039 PM 1: Falaili Rd & RoLlte 11 1 c12.2321 -,,, I-01 Large Group EBL EBT EBR IVVBL VVBT WBR NBL [ABT NOR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians �1 tt r M +� tt I "fit r Traffic Volume (vph) 2:x1? 1160 503 227 809 55 227 283 272 56 313 107 Future Volume (vph; 2160 1160 5D3 227 809 65 227 283 272 56 313 147 Turn Type 'rot NA Perm Prot 1+tA Porrn Prot NA Perm Prat NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 6 Qetectc,r Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 9,5 36.5 38,5 9,5 38,5 38.5 9.5 42.5 42,5 9.5 42,5 42.5 Total Split (s) 16.3 45.0 45.G 13,3 42.0 42.0 13.3 45.8 45,8 10.9 43,4 43.4 Total SPI it(%) 14.2% 39.1°x, 39.1% 11.6% 36.5% 36.5% 11.6114 39.8°{n 39.8% 9.5% 37,.7'9 3T.7% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red 'Tir (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,6 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Levi Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies 'Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max None Max Max None Ncne None None Kane None Act Effct Green (s) 11,2 40.9 40:9 t}.9 38.6 38.6 8.9 21.7 2.1.7 6.3 16.9 16.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 G.44 D.44 0.09 4.41 0.41 0.09 0.23 0.23 0.07 0.18 6.18 vie Ralio 0.65 0.77 0.58 0.71 0.56 0.09 0.72 0.35 0.52 0.48 9.50 0.29 Control Delay 49.1 28.5 9.7 56,1 25.1 2.3 56.8 31.4 10.8 59.1 36.4 7.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 D.0 6.0 0.0 o.o O'D 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 49.1 28.5 9,7 56.1 25.1 2.3 56.5 31,4 10.5 59.1 36,4 7,$ LOS D C A E C A E G B E D A App, cauh Lotay 26.3 30,2 31.8 32.7 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection Summa CyC1e Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length; 93.8 Natural Cyde: 110 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Unroord Nlaximum vlc Ratio: O.T7 Inteisectian Signal Delay; 29,4 Intersectlan LOS- C Inter eon Nmdty Utilization 69,4% ILLI Level of 5er'vicc C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 1; Palani Rd & Raute 11 1.*01 t02 'ro -0104 4N 05 06 07 08 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 1 HCM kith Signalized Ir,ttorsection SUn-ima{y 2039 PM W 1, Palani Rd & RoLite 11 11112-2021 '# 1 I'4layarnerrt EBL EBT EBR WBL dlBT VJBR NBL NET NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations+'" Traffic Volume (vehfh) 2Gil 1160 503 227 8t79 65 227 383 272 56 313 107 Future Volume ;vehlh) 2K 1160 5G3 217 8'70 665 227 283 272 566 313 107 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.04 Uo 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1, 00 1.0U 1.00 1.04 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No Na NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1855 1856 1870 1870 1841 1870 1855 1070 1870 1870 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 265 1184 0 233 826 0 232 289 0 57 319 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.08 0,98 0,98 0,98 0.98 0.96 0,98 0.98 0,95 0.98 Percent Meavy Veh, % 3 3 2 3 4 2 3 2 3 3 1 3 Cep. vehlh 348 1659 309 16603 309 6666 77 500 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.47 0.00 0.09 0,46 9.00 0,09 0.19 UQ Q.04 0.14 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 3428 3526 1595 3456 3497 1585 3428 3554 1585 1751 3554 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 265 1184 G 232 826 0 232 289 0 57 319 0 Grp Bat F7cvv(s),veh!hiln 1714 17663 1585 1728 1749 1585 1714 1777 1585 1781 1777 1555 0 Serves -s), s t3.5 21t7 0.G 5.6 14-4 0.0 5_7 6.2 010 2.7 7.3 0,0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_c), 5 6.5 23.0 0,0 5.6 14.4 0.0 5.7 6.2 0.0 2.7 7.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.44 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.40 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veht111 348 1659 309 1603 309 666 77 5{10 VJC Ratio(X) 0.766 0.71 0,75 0.52 0.75 0.43 0,74 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 470 1689 353 1603 351 1705 132 1606 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.170 1.Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1100 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 0.017 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 37,6 113.2 0.0 38,2 16.5 9.0 38.2 30.9 0,0 40.7 34,9 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 5.0 7.6 0.0 7.6 1.2 0.0 7.8 0.4 0,0 13.0 1.4 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacirf0ft3(54°l9),vehfln 2.9 5.1 0.0 2.6 5,66 0.0 2.7 2.66 0.0 1.5 3,2 0:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 42,66 20.8 0,0 45.8 17.7 0.0 46A 31.4 0.0 53.6 361.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS D C D B D C D D Approauh Vol, veli h 1449 A 1058 A 571 A 376 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 24.8 23.9 37.9 38.9 Approach LOS C C D D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.2 20.6 `12.2 45.0 12.2 16.6 13.2 44.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.4 41.3 8.8 40,5 8.8 38,9 11.8 37.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 4,7 8.2 7.6 25.0 7.7 9.3 8.5 16.4 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,0 2.0 0.1 7.5 0.1 2.2 0.3 5.7 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 26,1 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Reporl Page 3 Timings 2039 PM W 2: Henry St & Routo 11 1V12.202'I -'# --- t Large Group EBL EBT EBI 'VVBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NOR SOL SK Lane Configuratians �1 tt r +t 1 4+ 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 930 291 84 764 3W 126 318 40 411 342 Future 'Volume (vph) 190 930 291 84 764 368 126 318 40 411 342 Turn Type Prat NA Perm. Prot iqA Perm Skil NA Perm $Oil NA Protecled Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Permitlad Phases 4 8 2. Qetectad Phase 7 4 4 3 $ 8 2 2 2 & 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.G 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 9.5 30.5 30,5 9.5 30.5 30.5 35.5 35.5 35,5 35.5 35,5 Total Split (s) 12.2 34.0 34.G 9 5 31.3 31.3 36.0 36.0 35,0 35.5 35,5 Total SPI it(%) 10.6% 29.6% 29.6% 8.3% 27.20 27.29 31.3% 31.3% 31.3% 30.9% 30.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Ti (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{t to 1.0 1,0 1.0 1.G 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tirt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Max Max Nene flax Max None Ncne Nave Nave None Aot Eflut Green (s) 7.8 32.2 32.2 5.1 27.2 27.2 17.0 17.0 1700 25.7 25.7 Actuated grC Ratio 0.08 0.34 0.34 0.05 0.28 0.28 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.27 0.27 vie Ratio 0.72 0.80 0,42 0:48 0.79 0.53 0.41 0,% 0.12 0.75 0.72 Control Delay 61.2 38.2 7.0 57.0 40.6 6.6 39.9 39.9 0.7 45.1 34.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OA 0.0 Total Delay 61.2 38.2 7,0 57,0 4O.S 6.5 39.9 39.9 0.7 45-1 34.5 LOS E to A E D A G D A D G App, cauh Letay 34.8 3116 36.8 38.2 Approach LOS C 0 1) D Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih:115 Actuated Cycle Length: 96 i'daturai Cyde: 115 Control Type; Semi Act-1lncoord Nlaximum We Rato-. 0,80 Inteiseclion Signal Delay: 34.8 Intersectlan LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76,5k ILLI Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 2: HenrySt & Rauke 11 31 -PD4 07 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 4 HCM Signalized lntesection Capacity Analysts 2039 PM W 2. Henry St & Route 11 1V12.2021 I' oamerrt EEL EBT EBR WOL. WBT WER NBL NBT NBR SBL W SBR Lane Configurations �1 tt r t� 1 0 � ii 04 Traffic Volume (vph) 190 930 299 84 764 368 126 318 40 411 342 190 Future Volume (vph) 190 930 291 844 764 368 126 318 40 411 342 190 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1 W 1900 1904 1M 1900 19M 1900 1900 1900 1900 9804 1900 Total Lost lima (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Ubl. Fater 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Q.91 0.91 1.00 0.91 4.91 Frpb, ped;bikes 1.00 1.40 1,00 1.00 1,00 0.99 1.44 1.90 0,98 1.00 -199 Flpb, pedfbikes 1M 1.00 1,04 1100 1100 1.00 1.00 1.04 1,01 1,00 1.0 Frt I M 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 Flt Protected 4,9.5 1,00 UO 4.95 1.44 1,04 0.95 1,94 UQ 0.95 0,99 Saud, Flaw (protf 3335 3539 1583 3433 3471 1561 1595 3382 1537 1510 3195 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.04 0.95 1.44 1.04 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 Setd, Flow (Gerrnf 3335 3539 15$3 3433 3471 1561 1.595 3382 1537 1517 3196 Peal[ -hour IaCtor, U'H'F 0.98 0_98 D.98 9.98 0.9$ 15.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 17.98 Adj. Flow(vph) 1R4 949 297 86 784 376 129 324 41 419 349 194 RTOR Reductknr (vph) 0 0 184 0 0 266 0 0 34 0 39 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 194 949 113 66 780 110 116 337 7 323 600 0 Gonfl, Peds. (#(1r) 1 1 4 7 7 4 Confl, Bikes (A'hr) 1 1 1 HeavyVehlct'es "ie 5% 21% 2% 2% 4% 2°11 3% 2% 3% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prat NA Perry Prct NA Peqn spilt NA Perm Sp1il NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 2 6 6 Pgrmitled Phases 4 a 2 Actuated Green, G (s} 7.8 32.2 32.2 3.9 28.3 28.3 17.0 17.0 17.0 75.7 25.7 Effective Green, g (s) 7.8 32.2 32.2 3.9 28.3 28.3 17.0 ITU 17.0 25.7 25.7 Actuated g C Rano 0.08 9.33 0.33 9.04 Q.29 0. 0-18 0,18 0,18 0,27 0.27' Clearance Time (s) 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 41.5 Vehde Extension (s} 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 19 3,0 3.0 3.4 Lana Grp Cap (vphf-- 268 1177 52E 138 t:11 41MI, 2K r53 269 427 848 V+s Ratio Prat cO.ID6 X0.27 O,03 +."x,22 [1,077 Cf.). 1,0 c10.20 0.19 Vs Ratio Perm O.07 0.07 0.00 v.'c Ratio 0,72 0.81 0.21 0.62 0.77 0,24 9.41 0.57 0,03 0.76 0.71 Uniform Way, d1 43.4 29.5 23.2 45.7 31.3 26,1 35.5 36,5 33,0 32.7 32,2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.30 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Inc'ernental Delay, d2 9.3 e_0 0.4 8.15 5_£ 1.2 1.0 1,3 0.0 7.5 2.7 Delay (s) .52.8 35.4 24.1 54.2 36.9 27.3 36.5 37.8 33.1 40.1 34.9 Le'v'el of Service D D C D D C D D C D C Appfuauh Delay 36,4 35.2 37,1 36.6 Approach LA'S D D L' D tntatsection Summa HDA 2000 Control Delay 35.8 HCM M Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.75 Actuated Cycle Length (s-) 96.8 Sum of lost tirna IN 18,0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysts Period (miry) 15 c Grttical Lane Croup 5:00 pm BasA-fine Synchro 10 Report Page 5 FICIV1 6th TWSC 2039 PM I ROUtO 11 & Hualaiai Rd (North) 1 c12.2721 Intersection ht Fly)• s.veh c.4 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions ' r Conflicting FlGvv AJI t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 10 88 89 1287 1414 17 Future Vol, vehlh 1fl 88 85 1297 1416 17 CcnnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 a 0 0 0 Sign Control Slop Slap Free Free Free Free RT Channeiized - Free - done - Ykk Storage Length 144 Q 650 - - 700 Veh in Median Stuager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % fl - - 0 0 Peak Hour Faclor S7 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 4 2 6 MAvint Flow 10 41 92 1327 1460 18 Majormitu Minp(2 Mal6r1 Maio, .1 Conflicting FlGvv AJI 2971 1460 0 - 0 Stage 1 1460 - - - - - Stage 2 1511 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy BA2 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.51$ 2.218 - - - Pol Cap -1 Maneuver 16 0 458 Stage 1 213 0 - - 5lage 2 201 0 - Platoon bluGied, ''k - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 13 - 463 - - - tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar 13 - - Stage 1 171 Stage 2 201 Approach ES N6 so HGM Control Delay, s$ 553.1 0.9 4 HCM LOS F Mhor Uriie major MMlvmt iVBL NBT EBLrr1 EBLn 'SBT SBR Capacity (vehlh) 463 - 13 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0.198 - 0.79; - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 14.7 55301 0 HGNI Lane LDS B - F A - - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) 0.7 - 1.8 Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWcifl Not Defined `. Afl major value ire platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 7 HCM 6th TWSC 2039 PM W 4: Route 11 & Hualalai Rd (South) 1111212021 Inlerseclion Int'e.Ny s.veh movemeni 3 6 Y4'BL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT LdnC- Gonligurations Stage 1 r T - - - Stage 2 t Traffic Vol, v&Vh 14 71 1313 4 61 1446 Future Vol, vehih 14 71 1313 4 61 1446 ConiticOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Step Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channeiized - Free - 'Yield - None Slofage Lenglh fl 0- ttrlav Cop -2 Maneuvar - 13 - - Veh in Median Starager # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - 0 - - D Plc Hour Faclor 97 97 97 97 97 97 Heavy Veh?cies, % 7 2 3 2 8 2 MAvinl Flow 14 73 1354 4 63 1491 Majorywr Minprl Mal6r1 Maio, Conllic6ng Flaw AJI 2973 - B 0 1354 0 Stage 1 1356 - - - - - Stage 2 1617 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.47 - - 4.18 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.47 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.47 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.563 - - ?-.272 Poo Cap -1 Maneuver 15 a - - 489 - Stage 1 234 0 - - 5lage 2 174 0 _ - - _ Platoon bluGied,'k - - - Mou Cap -1 Maneuver -13 - - - 489 - ttrlav Cop -2 Maneuvar - 13 - - Stage 1 234 Slage 2 152 Appfoach M N6 so HGM Control Delay, s$ 579.6 0 0.5 HCM LOS F Mhor Corm major MMlvmt Nf NBRWBLn11BLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 13 - 485 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - 1.t1 - 0.129 - MGM Contrd Delay (s) - -$679,5 0 13.4 - HGNI Lane LDS - F it $ - HCM 95th °dile Q(veh) - - 2.4 - D.4 - Nctfs Vdume exceeds capacity S; Delay exceeds 300s +: CompuWon Not Defined `. Afl major value ira platoon 5:00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 8 Tin7ir4l,b 2039 PM W b: Rc Lite} I' & Puapuaarlui St 1 12;2021 ---W 111 *--- t -01 Large Group EBL EBT EBR WBL VVBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SEIR Lane CDnfiguratians + r I t r V t + r Traffic Volume (vph) 199 23 115 53 23 104 105 878 61 142 1242 100 Future Volume (vph) 199 23 116 53 23 104 105 978 61 142 1282 100 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. Perm NA Perm pm+p# NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 a 8 2 2 6 6 Detectad Phase 4 4 4 6 8 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 22,5 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22,5 21,5 22.5 9.5 76.3 76.3 11.2 78.0 78.0 Total SPI it(%) 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 20..5% 20.5% 8.6% 69.4°/o 69A% 10.2 "/a 70.95a 70.9% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,6 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes 'Yes Yea Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None None Nor Max Max None Max Max Act Effat Careen (s) 18.011 18.0 18.0 18.4 18.0 18.0 76.9 71.9 71.9 80.1 73.5 73.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 4.16 0.16 0,16 0,16 0.16 0.70 0.65 0.65 0.73 0.67 6.67 vie Ratio 0.96 0.08 0.35 0.24 0.46 0.31 0.77 0.84 0,06 0.59 1.40 0.10 Control Delay 97.4 39.9 10.0 43.4 39.9 1-0.4 50.9 22.6 1.9 16.0 43.8 1.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0,0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 87.4 39.9 110.0 43.4 39.9 100 50,9 22.6 1.9 16.4 43.a 1.9 LOS F to B D D B D C A B D A App, cauh Letay 63.5 24,1 24.2 38.0 Approach LOS E C C D Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglh:114 Actuated Cycle Length; 110 Natural Cyde: 110 Control TyDe: Semi ANC-Uncoord Nlaximum, We Ra#o:1.00 Inteisectian Signal Delay: 35.0 Intersection LOS. Q Intemdon Capacity U61 izatiori 95.0', ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page* 9 HCC 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-trna{y 2039 PM W 5; Route 11 & Puapuaanui St 1111212021 --*� -+-` I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR 1VBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations I t iif t I t i* � + r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 199 23 116 53 23 104 145 978 61 142 1202 100 Future Volume ;vehlh) 199 23 116 53 23 M4 105 9T8 61 142 1202 100 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.fl0 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.D0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1870 9$70 1626 1870 1855 1641 1870 1870 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 216 25 0 55 25 0 114 lads 0 146 1239 Ci Peak Hour Factor €1.92 0.+92 0.92 0.97 0,92 0,97 0.92 0.97 0,97 0.97 0,97 0,92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 2 2 5 2 ? 4 2 2 2 Cep, vehlh 277 306 277 306 153 1244 290 1251 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.00 0,15 0,16 •0.00 0.04 0.67 100 0.04 D.67 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1386 1870 1585 1386 1870 1547 1751 18.55 1560 1781 1670 1585 Grp Volume(v;. vehfh 216 25 G 55 25 0 114 1008 0 146 1239 0 Grp Sat F1cw(s),veh'hiln 1386 1870 1585 1386 1870 1547 1781 1856 1560 1781 1870 1555 0 Serves -s), s 16.8 1.2 D.G 3.8 1,2 0.0 2.3 43.3 0.0 2.8 71.3 0,0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 18.0 1.2 0.4 5.1 1,2 0.01 2.3 43.3 4.0 2.8 71.3 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.DD 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.010 L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veWh 777" 306 277 306 153 1240 299 1251 VEC Ratio(X) 0.78 0.08 0.20 0.08 0.75 0.81 0,49 01.99 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 277 306 277 3a6 156 124D 327 1251 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,G0 1,00 TAO 1,00 1•Q0 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0. DO 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 i.N 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 46.7 38.9 0.0 41.1 38.9 0.0 29.8 13.2 0,0 165 17.8 0.0 her Decay (d2). slveh 13.3 0.1 0.0 0,3 0.1 0.0 17.4 5.5 0.0 1.2 23.2 0.0 In!t at Q Delay(Q) siveh OL 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 °dile Bacir0Dft0(54°l9),vehfln 6.9 0.6 0.0 11 0.6 0.0 2.7 18,0 0.0 1.9 34.6 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp C3elay{d),slveh 60.0 39.0 0.0 41.4 39.4 0.0 47.2 19,1 0.0 17.7 41.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS E D D D ]_ B B D Appfoauh Vol, veli h 241 A 80 A 1122 A 1385 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 57.8 40.7 22.L 38,5 Approach LOS E D C D Timer -.Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.4 77.9 22.5 9.3 78.0 22.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.7 71.8 18.t} 5.0 73.5 1$.D Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 4.8 45.3 20.0 4.3 73.3 7.1 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.1 9.7 Q.0 0,0 0.1 0.1 tntefsection Summary HCC 5th. Ctrl Delay 333 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bras.,;;,°:c� Synchro 10 Report Phgh 11 FICIVI 6th TWSC 2039 PM 6. ROUtO 11 & Kuakim Stroot 1 c12.2n21 Intersection ht Fly)• s.veh 7.9 10lovemenI EEL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR LdnC- Gon figural ions Mingo r Contlictrng Flaw AJI t + r Traffic Vol, vehrh 0 325 341 1155 127 } 0 Future Vol, vehlh 0 325 341 1155 1270 0 ConnicOng Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Free - Nome - 'y'eetd Storage Lcngih 184 0 630 - - 700 Veh in Median Stmager # 0 - - 0 4 - Grade. % C - - 0 0 - Peaak Hour Faclar 98 98 98 98 98 98 Heavy Veh?cies, % 5 2 2 3 2 6 MAvint Flow 0 332 348 4179 1296 0 MajorlKha Mingo Majorl MajoI Contlictrng Flaw AJI 3171 1296 0 - 0 Stage 1 121* - - - - - Stage 2 1875 - - - - - Crltical Hdwy 6.4.8 4.12 - - Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.48 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.45 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.572 _ 2.218 Poo CW1 Mar rover 11 0 535 Stage 1 249 0 - - Slage 2 128 0 - Platoon bluGied, ''k - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 4 - 535 - - - tAGv Cop -2 Maneuvar 4 - - - - - Stage 1 87 Stage 2 128 Approach m NES so HGM Control Delay, s 0 5.3 0 HCM LOS A Minor UrWmajor MMlvmt NBL W EBLrr1 EBLn 'SST SBR Capacity (vehh) 535 HGM Lane V.'C Ratio 0.55 - - - - - MGM Contrd Delay (s) 23.4 - 0 0 HGNI Lane LDS C - A A - - H M 95th %file 0(veh) 4.7 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 12 Tinilr-gs 2039 PVI (; Rc Lite 1 & _�ko Strr ! lL kc� S€r t 1 12.7721 ''' --*, ' *.-- ! Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NSL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configurations I 1� 1~4 + r f Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 1068 64 2D2 1171 190 Future Volume (vph) 152 30 fig 40 37 1068 64 202 1171 190 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Plarm Protected Phases 4 4 8 8 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 5 6 Detector Phase 4 4 S 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 2.2.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22.5 9,5 88.0 08.0 1M 95.5 95.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 15.D% 15.0% 15.0% 6.3% 56.7'9 58.7°x6 11.3No 63.7% 637% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 too Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None Bane Nene None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 16.5 16.5 15.9 15.9 88.6 83.6 83.6 100.7 93.2 93.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0,60 0.57 0.57 0.69 0.64 0.64 vie Ratio 0.81 0.36 0.38 0,92 036 1.06 0.07 1.065 1.03 0.19 Control Delay 93.5 35.1 66,8 62,0 20.0 75.4 0.5 119.5 61.9 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 4.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 93.5 35.1 665.8 62,0 20.0 75.4 0.5 119.5 61,9 6.1 LOS F D E E ® E A F E A App, cauh Leiay 73,7 63,0 69.5 82.5 Appreaah LOS E E E E Intersection Summa C+Qle Leoplh. 150 Actualeo Cycle Length; 146.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: ,Actuated-UncoDrdinated Nlaximum 0c Ratio:1.06 Intersection Signal Delay: 65,8 Intersection LOS E Inteaaon Opacity lJt➢iization 107.E ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases; ! 7: Route 11 & Laka Sweet 1ako Street �! 01 "O 2 "U4 f 8 0 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 13 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-ima{y 2039 PM W T; Route 111 & Lake Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11112-2021 -� '� *� `'41 I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR '411BL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V t j* t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 1068 64 202 1171 190 Future Volume ;vehlh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 106.8 64 202 1171 190 Initial Q (02b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1°00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0U 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1850 1870 1856 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 0 72 42 0 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0'A 0.96 0,96 0.96 0, H 0.96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? 2 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 184 196 99 101 137 1146 233 1268 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 C1.00 0.06 0,06 0.00 0.03 0.62 UC Q.09 0.68 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 3826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 0 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 12.0 2.0 0,0 5,4 3.0 4.0 1.1 77.4 U-0 10.0 81.7 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_q 5 12.0 2.0 0.0 5.4 3.0 0.0 1.1 77.4 0,0 10.0 81.7 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1-00 1,00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 184 196 99 101 137 11461 233 1288 VJC Ratio(X) 0.86 0.16 0.73 0.41 0.26 0.47 0.90 0.96 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 233 249 237 243 152 1145 239 1268 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.110 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.011 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.04 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 59.5 55,1 0.0 62.9 61.7 0.0 30.5 24.7 0,0 44.9 20.2 0,0 her Delay (d2). siveh 21.9 0A C1,0 $.7 2.7 0.0 1.1 20.4 0.0 32.5 173 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 6'5 1,0 0,0 2.7 1.5 0.0 0.8 38,4 0.0 6.5 38.6 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 81.5 55.5 0.0 72.5 64.4 0.0 31.6 45.1 0.0 77A 37.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS F E E E C G E D Appfcauh Vol, veil h 189 A 114 A 1151 A 1430 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 77.2 69.6 44.7 43.6 Approach LOS E E 11) D Timer -Assigned Phe 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 16.5 88.0 13.7 8.3 96,2 12.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 12.5 83.5 1H 5.0 91.0 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 12.0 79.4 14.0 3.1 83.7 7.4 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 2.9 02 0.0 5.3 0.2 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 47. } HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, ESR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Papa 15 Tinilr-gs 2039 PM 8. Rc Lite} 1' III Road 1 i :1212021 Analysis Period (min) 15 #{ts and F'hases; 6: Haute 11 & Kamm hameha III KoaCI at �6 . • 04 0_ L 5:00 pm Baseline Syrnchro 10 Reporl Page 16 -*--- 1 I Large Group EBT EER WBT NBL NBT 5BL SST Lane Configurations 4 r 4:� 1 '1. 1 +14, Traffic Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 695 19 692 Future Volume (vph) 11 52 11 64 E95 19 6192 Turn Type NA Perm NA Ptat NA Prat NA Protected Phases 2 1] 3 8 7 4 Permibd Phases 2 Qetectof Phase 2 2 6 3 3 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 30.0 30.0 25.0 9,5 23,5 9.5 23.5 Total Split (s) 30.5 30.5 25.0 11.6 45,0 9.5 42,9 Total SPI it(%) 27.7% 27.7% 22.7% 10.5% 40.E 6.+6% 39.0°, Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 All -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes 'des Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None Max None Max Act Eff.t Green (s) 29.1 .23.1 6.9 TO 45.3 5.1 39.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.26 0.26 0.G8 0.08 0.52 H6 0.46 vie Ratio 0.81 0.12 0.27 0.48 0,78 0.19 0.68 Control Delay 46.6 1.3 29.5 55.1 25.8 48.9 22.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total aolay 46.6 1.3 29.5 55.1 28,B 48,9 22.8 LOS D A C E C Q C Appicauh De!ay 40.7 29.5 30.9 23.3 Approach LOS D C C C Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length; 87,6 Natural Cyde: iia Control TyDe, Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Ratio: 0.81 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 29.2 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion Capacity U6lizatiori 78.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 #{ts and F'hases; 6: Haute 11 & Kamm hameha III KoaCI at �6 . • 04 0_ L 5:00 pm Baseline Syrnchro 10 Reporl Page 16 FIC;Pr1 6,11 Sir;rtalizod Ir-tt�rsoctiori Surilnia-y 2039 PK/I VV 8; ROUte 1 III Road 1 ` If 7721 I'4layament EBL > EBR 1NBL WBT WBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations r :k T. I +T. Traffic Volume (vehfh) 343 11 52 7 11 21 64 595 11 19 692 322 Future Volume ;wehih) .343 11 52 7 11 21 64 695 11 19 592 322 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 4 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.0D 1.00 Uo 1.00 1,00 1.90 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 $at Row, veh1hin 1855 1767 1B11 1870 1870 1870 18556 1856 1870 1870 1670 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 361 12 tr 7 12 22 67 732 12 20 728 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 D.S5 0,95 0,95 0,95 0.95 0.95 4,95 0.95 0,95 D.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 3 9 5 2 2 2 3 ? 2 2 2 2 Gap,vehl11 408 14 11 15 33 86 872 14 39 1608 Arrive On Gruen 0.25 0.25 {1.00 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.48 0.48 G-02 0,45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1631 54 1535 289 495 908 1767 1820 ail 1781 3647 0 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 373 0 Pr 41 0 D 67 0 744 20 728 0 Grp Sat F1ow(s),veh!hiln 1685 0 1535 1692 4 0 1767 0 1850 1781 1777 0 Q Serves -s), s 18.1 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 29.1 0.9 12,a 0,0 Cycle 0 clear(g_c), s 18.1 0.0 0,0 2.0 0,0 0.0 3.2 0.0 9.7 0.9 12.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 0.97 1.00 0.17 0.54 1.00 0.02 1.00 D.Do Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veA 422 0 fit 0 0 86 D 886 39 1608 VJC Ratio(X) 0.88 0,00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.78 0.00 0,84 0,51 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 516 0 409 0 0 148 D 886 145 1608 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.0{1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 D.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 30.6 0.0 C1_0 40.4 0.0 0.0 39.9 0.0 19.3 41.0 16.0 0,0 hor Delay (d2). siveh 14.5 0.0 &C 11.5 0.0 0.0 14A 0.0 4.4 9.7 0.9 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 0.0 0.6 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 8A 0.0 0,0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1A 0,0 13.2 0.5 4.5 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 45,1 0.0 0.0 51.9 0.0 0.0 53.9 0.4 2.8.7 50.7 16.9 0.0 LnGrp LOS D A D A A D A C D B Appfcauh Vol, vett h 373 A 41 1311 748 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 45.1 51.9 30.7 17.8 Approach LOS D D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 25.7 8.6 42.9 7.6 6.4 45.1 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 26.0 7.1 38,4 20.5 5.0 40.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (9-c+1 1). s 20,1 5.2 14,0 4.0 2,9 31.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 1.1 0.0 4.7 0.1 0.0 3.1 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 20.D HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 18 9: Route, 1' & Rayed Vistab 1` 122"i21 Inter.seclion In movement AIBL WBR. NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Gonfignretions MCM Control Delay (s) r f r HCtwf Lane LDS f Traffic Vol, v&Vh 12 68 1155 74 79 1255 Future Vol, vehlh 12 68 1155 74 79 1255 ConiticOng Peds, Or 4 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - Mane - None - Hone Storage Length fl 0 - 540 500 - Veh in Median Starager # 0 - 0 - - 0 Grade. % fl - B - - D Peak Hour Faclor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Veh?cies, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 MAvint Flow 13 74 1255 80 86 1364 Mejorf# ira Minorl MajW MajoI Conflicting Fluvu PJI 2791 1255 0 4 1335 0 Stage 1 1255 - - - - - Slage 2 1535- Crltical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 - - 4.12 Critical 14dwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.31$ - - ?-.218 Poo CW1 Maneuver 21 209 - - 517 - Stage 1 268 Slage 2 198 Platoon bluGied, ''k - - Mau Cap -1 Maneuver 16 209 - - 517 - ttrlav Cup -2 Maneuver 18 - - - - Slage 1 26B - - - - Slage 2 163 . Approach m N8 SB HCM Control Delay, s V. 0 O.'8 HCM LOS F mhor Corm major MMlvmt NBT NBRWBLn1WBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veWh) - - 18 209 517 - HGM Lane V.'C Ratio - - G.725 4.334 0.166 - MCM Control Delay (s) - -$405.8 ,31,4 93.3 - HCtwf Lane LDS - IF D B H M 95th %file 0(veh) - - 1.9 1.5 0.6 - 5.44 pm Baseline Synchro 14 Report Page 19 Tin7ir(l,b 2039 AM W Protected RULltc,' 1 '\',,ia 4 r1 Strc:ot 1 ; 12:272'1 -)v t Large Group EBR NBL NBT SET SBR Lane Configuratians e ' Traffic Volume (vph) 159 605 1060 1056 2 Future Volume ,vphj 159 605 1060 1056 2 Turn Type Perm Prat NA NA Perm Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permibd Phases 4 6 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22,5 .22.5 22,5 Total Split (s) 22.5 47,0 127,5 KS 80.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 31.30(a B5.0% 53.7% 53.7° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 All -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost '1 im (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Ides Recall Mode None None Max Max Max Act Eftct Green (s) 5.5 4Z.5 1210 7B.tl 76.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.04 0.31 D.a9 0,55 0.55 vie Ratio 0.36 1.19 0.74 1.14 HO Control Delay 2.2 144.2 4.8 103.4 9.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 01 6.0 0,0 Total Delay 2.2 144.2 5.4 103,4 9,5 LOS A F A F A App, cauh De!ay 55,8 103,2 Approach LOS E F Intersection Summa C�Qle LE-ogth. 150 Acfuate�! Cycle Length. 137.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi AcWnroord Nlaximum vic Ratio -.1.19 1nteisectlan Signal Delay; 70.1 Intersection LOS. E Intersection Capacity Utilization 96,6*A ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6. RQutp. 11 Slreel 101 01 5.00 pm Baseline Synchre 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Inttorsection SUmma{y 2039 AM w Protected 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakim Strout 11117f2021 EBL EER NBL NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations 2 i"' 6 t t 127.5 Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 159 cl(E5 1060 1056 2 Future Volume ;wehih) 0 150 605 1060 1056 2 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 0 4 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.90 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1,870 1641 1670 1826 1826 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 651 1140 1135 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 5 5 7 Cep, vehlh 1 594 1761 1098 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.33 0,66 0.60 -7.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1560 1781 1625 1826 1522 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 651 1140 1135 0 Grp Bat E1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1560 1781 1826 1826 1522 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 42.5 7.5 7G_0 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 0,0 0.0 42.5 7,5 76.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, veldts 1 594 1761 1088 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 1.1 D 0.65 1,04 Avail Cap(c_a), veil+h 251 504 1761 1088 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.04 1,00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 42.5 0.2 25.7 0.0 Inc= Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 66.8 1.9 39.1 0.0 In!t al Q Del ay(d3),srveh 4.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.4 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 29.3 0,9 42.8 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 108.5 2.1 64.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A F A F Appfoauh Vol, veil h 0 A 1791 11355 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 40,8 64.9 Approach LOS 0 E Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 6 #� Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 D.0 47.0 80.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 11210 1$A 42.5 76.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+11), s 9.5 X0.0 44.5 78.0 Green Ext Tome f p c), s 17.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 tntefsecsion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 50.1 HCl`A 6th LOS U N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBRI is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 1039 AM IN P(:rrliissive 6. ROLL t(} 1 & �C.iak r1 Strr_.ct 1;,12:7321 Large Group EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configuratians if '� + f e Traffic Volume (vph) 159 605 1060 1056 2 Future Volume (vphj 159 605 1060 1056 2 Turn Type Perm Perm NA NA Perm Protecled Phases 2 6 Permitlad Phases 4 2 6 Qetectad Phase 4 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 22,5 Total Split (s) 22,5 127.5 127,5 127,5 127.5 Total SPI int(%) 15.0% 85.D% 85.0% 85.0% 85.E Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Recall Mode None Max Max Max flax Act Effct Careen (s) 7.5 123.1 123.1 123.1 123.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.05 0.86 D. BB 0.88 0.88 vie Ratio 0.68 1.85 0.71 0.71 0,00 Control Delay 21.8 412.7 6.1 6.0 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.2 6.0 0.0 Total De12y 21,8 412.7 5.3 U 1.0 LOS C F A A A App, cauh Delay 154.0 6,0 Approach LOS 1= A Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Atualeo Cycle Length. 139.6 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum 0c Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Delay- 92,4 Intersection LOS F Intemdon Capacity Ublizatiort 96.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period [min) 15 5.00 pm Baselire Synchre 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Irttorsection SUn-trna{y 2069 AM VV Permissive 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakin� Strnot 11112!2021 EBL EER NBL NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations 2 i"' t t 0.0 Traffic Volume (vehfh) D 159 cl(E5 1050 1056 2 Future Volume ;vehih) 0 150 605 1060 1056 2 Initial Q (0b), veh 0 0 i} 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.90 1.00 HChA 6th LOS 1.00 Parking Flus. Ad} I.00 1.00 1.l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1841 1670 1826 1a2b 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 651 1140 1135 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, °la 2 2 5 5 7 Cep, vehlh 1 506 1761 9761 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 (06 0,96 0.96 -7.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1560 496 1826 1626 1522 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 651 1140 1135 0 Grp sat F1ovv(s),vehlhlln 1781 1566 496 1626 1826 1522 0 Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 115.5 7.5 7.4 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 4.D 0.0 123.0 7.5 7.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.04 1W 1.00 Lai9e Grp Cap(c}, veh ih 1 506 1761 1761 VJC Ratio(X) 0.00 1.20 0.65 0.64 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 W 1761 1761 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 U0 1.00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.40 1.00 1.00 1.04 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 12,4 4.2 0.2 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 4.0 143.2 1,9 1.8 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 4.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.4 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 36,6 0.9 0.9 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 155.6 2.1 2.0 0.0 LnGrp LOS A F A A Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1791 1135 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 57,9 2.0 Approach LOS E A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 127.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 18.0 123.4 Max Q Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 125.0 U.0 9.4 Greer? Ext Tome f pc), s 0.0 4.0 16.8 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 36 HChA 6th LOS U N otes Unsignaiized De:,6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2039 IAM IN PFOtP rm 6. RoLr te} 1 & �C.iak n Strutt 1;,12:7721 Large Group EBR NBL NBT SET SBR Lane Configuratians e ' t Traffic Volume (vph) 159 605 1HO 1056 2 Future Volume ,vphj 159 605 1060 1056 2 Turn Type Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 .22.5 22,5 Total Split (s) 22.5 44,0 127,5 K,5 63.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 29.3% 85.0% 55.7% 55.7° Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 110 160 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 5.5 123.0 123.0 7H 79.0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.04 0.89 D.a9 0,57 0.57 vie Ratio 0,38 1.16 0.70 1.09 0.00 Control Delay 2.4 127.9 4.8 85.8 8.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 01 0.0 0.0 Total aa:lay 2.4 127,9 5.4 85,8 8.5 LOS A F A F A App, cauh Deiay 49,7 85,6 Approach LOS D F Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 137.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi AcWnroord Maximum vic Ratlo:1.16 Inteisectlan Signal Delay. 60.2 Intersection LOS. E Intersection Capacity Utilization 96,6*A ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Slreel Qc 05 14 06 04 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 FICIV1 6th Signalized Irttorsection SUmma{y 2039 AM W ProtPerm 6; RaUtO 11 & Kuakim Strout 11117f2021 EBL EER NBL NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations 2 i"' 5 t t 127.5 Traffic Volume (vehfh) 0 159 cl(E5 1060 1056 2 Future Volume ;vehih) 0 150 605 1060 1056 2 Initial Q (0b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.90 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} I.00 1.00 1.1}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1841 1674 1826 1826 1796 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 651 1144 1135 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0,93 0,93 Percent Heavy Veh, °la 2 2 7 Cep, vehlh 1 608 1761 1131 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.31 0,66 0,62 •0.10 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1560 1781 1625 1826 1522 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 651 1140 1135 0 Grp Bat P1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1540 1781 1626 1826 1522 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 39,5 7.5 79.0 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, 5 0.0 0.0 39.5 7.5 79.0 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.b4 1.00 Latta Grp Cap(c}, veWh 1 608 1761 1131 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 1.07 0.65 1.00 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 251 608 1701 1131 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.44 1.00 U0 1.00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.40 1.04 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 0.0 0.0 41.5 0.2 24.2 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 56.7 1.9 27.5 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln U 0.0 27,4 4.9 40.1 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 98.2 2.1 51.8 0,0 LnGrp LOS A F A F Appfoauh Vol, veb!h 0 A 1791 1135 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 37,0 51.8 Approach LOS D D Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 44.0 B3.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 11210 18,0 39.5 79.4 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+11), s 9.5 0.0 41.5 81.0 Greer? Ext Tome fp c), s 17.1 4.4 0.0 0,0 tnte-fsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 42.? HChA 6th LOS U N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBRI is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2039 P 'W Frr)te:cted RoLIte3 1 & C.iakirt, S tri3- cat1 :12,2021 Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases, 6. &Ukp. 11 & ttOaK ri sty eel 01 V 05 T 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 -t 4\ t t Large Group EBR NBL NBT Lane Configuratians ' Traffic Volume (vph) 325 341 1155 1270 Future Volume (vph) 325 341 1155 1270 Turn Type Perm Prat NA NA Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permibd Phases 4 Qetectad Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 31.0 127,5 96,5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 20.7% 85.0% 64.3% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Tirne (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost '1 irt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Recall Mode None Bare Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 10.5 26,5 123.2 92.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.07 0.19 D.86 0.65 vie Raba 0,86 1.06 0.74 1.09 Control Delay 31.5 120.3 8.1 75.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0 2 6.0 Total Df:lay 31.5 120.3 8.3 75.5 LOS C F A E App, cauh De! ay 33.9 75.6 Approaeh LOS C F Intersection Summery C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuate! Cycle Length. 142.7 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Ty:ae: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum 0c Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Delay. K7 Intersection LOS. Q Intersection Capacity Wizaalion 94,5% ILLI Level of Service F Analysis Period [min) 15 Splits and Phases, 6. &Ukp. 11 & ttOaK ri sty eel 01 V 05 T 06 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2039 PM W Protected 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11112!2021 EBL EER N5L NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations I r 1i t t r Traffic Volume (vehth) 0 325 341 1155 1270 0 Future Volume ;vehlh) 0 325 341 1155 1270 0 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.N 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1781 1870 1870 1856 1$70 1811 Adj Eloy Rate,. vehlh 0 0 348 1179 1296 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,08 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 370 1790 1950 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 {1.21 0,66 0,72 -7.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 1781 1856 3870 1535 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 0 0 348 1179 1296 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1697 1585 1781 1956 1876 1535 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 24.5 7.8 80.1 0.0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_c), s 0.0 0.0 24.5 7.8 80.1 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.04 1.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 1 370 1790 1350 VJC Ratio(X) 0.00 Qui 0.66 096 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 370 1794 1350 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.110 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.04 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), shell 0.0 0.0 49.7 0.2 16_ t 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 31.7 1.9 16.7 0.0 In!t al Q Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 °dile Bacir=(501/9),vehfln U 0.0 14.1 1.0 35-7 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 81.4 2.1 32.8 0,0 LnGrp LOS A F A C Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1527 1296 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 20,2 32.6 Approach LOS C C Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 31.17 96.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 1$.0 26.5 92.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 9.8 0,6 26.5 82,1 Green Ext Tome fp c), s i&8. 0.0 0.0 7.4 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 26'D HCl`A 6th LOS C N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2039 P 'W Frr)te:cted Rt rete} 1 & C.iak i ri, S tri3- c,,t1 : 12,2021 Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baselire Synchre 10 Report Page 1 --t 4\ t t Large Group EBR NBL NBT Lane Configuratians ' Traffic Volume (vph) 325 34.1 1155 1270 Future Volume (vPh) 325 341 1155 1270 Turn Type Perm Perrin NA NA Protecled Phases 2 6 Permibd Phases 4 2 D9tectad Phase 4 2 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 Total Split (s) 22.5 127.5 127,5 127,5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 85.D% 85.0% 85.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 110 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.1) 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Recall Mode None Max Max Max Act Effct Careen (s) 18.0 125.0 123.0 123,0 Actuated grC Ratio 0.12 4.82 D. B2 0,82 vie Ratio 1.07 2.13 0.78 0.85 Control Delay 107.6 548.6 11.3 15.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 05 3 Do Total Df�12y 107.5 548,6 11,7 15.Q LOS I" F B B Apprcauh Letay 134.1 15,0 Approach LOS l= B Intersection Summery C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuateo Cycle Length. 150 Natural Cycle: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Uncoord Maximum 0c Ratio: 2.13 Inteisectlan Signal delay: 62,4 Intersection LOS F Inter don Capacity Utilization 94.51A ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 5:00 pm Baselire Synchre 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary 2039 PM W Protected 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11112!2021 EBL EER N5L NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations I r 1i t t r Traffic Volume (vehth) 0 325 341 1155 1270 0 Future Volume ;vehlh) 0 325 341 1155 1270 0 Initial Q (0b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.N HCl`A 6th LOS 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1761 1870 1870 1856 1$70 1811 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 348 1179 1296 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0,08 0.98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 433 1790 1E104 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.g5 0,95 0.96 •0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 425 1856 1870 1535 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 0 0 348 1179 1296 0 Grp Bat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1697 1585 425 1956 1876 1535 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.17 65.8 7.8 10.2 0.0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_c), s 0.0 O.f] TU 7.8 10.2 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.01] 1.Oa 3.00 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh-h 1 433 1790 1804 VJC Ratio(X) 0.00 030 D,66 0.72 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 433 1790 1504 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), shell 0.0 0.0 4.6 0.2 0.3 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 14.6 1.9 2.5 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 °dile BacirtDft3(50°l9),vehfln 0.0 0.0 4.0 1.0 1.3 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 19.2 2.1 2.8 0.l} LnGrp LOS A B A A Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1527 1296 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 6.0 2.8 Approach LOS A A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 d 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 127.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 18.0 123.0 Max Q Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 78.4 O.0 12,2 Green Ext Tome fp c), s 26.9 0.0 25,9 Int-efsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay a.5 HCl`A 6th LOS A N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tinilr-gb 2039 PM W ProtPerm 0. RoLr tc, 1 & �\'uakirt, Strout 1 : 12,2021 Analysis Period [min) 15 and Phases, 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street Qc 05 11 [36} 04 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 -t 4\ t t Large Group EBR NBL NBT SIFT Lane Configuratians e ' + t Traffic Volume (vph) 325 341 1155 1270 Future Volume ,vphj 325 341 1155 1270 Turn Type Perm pm+pt NA NA Protecled Phases 5 2 6 Permitlad Phases 4 2 Detectad Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split ('s) 22.5 9.5 22.5 22,5 Total Split (s) 22.5 27.0 127.5 140,5 Total Split(%) 15.0% 18.01A H5.0% 67.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 A l -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.{) 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yat Recall Mode None None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.5 123.1 123.1 % 1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.09 0.85 D.55 0,66 vie Ratio 0.87 1.06 0.75 1.05 Control Delay 37,7 112.7 9.1 53,8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 07 2 6.0 Total Delay 37.7 112.7 9.3 63.9 LOS D F A E App, cauh De! ay 32,9 618 Approach LOS C F Intersection Summary C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actllaleo Cycle Length. 144.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Ty:ae: Semi Act-Uncoord Nlaximum vic Ratio: 1,06 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 46.1 Intersection LOS. Q Intertion Capacity Utilization 94.511A ILLI Level of Service F Analysis Period [min) 15 and Phases, 6. Route 11 & Kuakini Street Qc 05 11 [36} 04 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Surnmary 2039 PM W ProtPerm 6, Route 11 & Kuakini Street 11112f2021 EBL EER N5L NET SBT SRR Lane Configurations I r 1i t t r TraffrcVolurne (vehth) 0 325 341 1155 1270 0 Future Volume ;wehlh) 0 325 341 1155 1270 0 Initial Q (02b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.90 1.N 1.00 Parking Bus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,l}0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No Act Sat Row, veh1hin 1781 1870 1870 1856 1$70 1811 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 0 0 348 1179 1296 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.98 0.98 0.38 0.98 0,08 0,98 Percent Heavy Veh, % 8 2 2 3 2 6 Cep, vehlh 1 40C' 1790 1£65 Arrive On Gruen 0.00 0.00 0.04 0,96 0.89 •0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1697 1585 1781 1856 3870 1595 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 0 0 348 1179 1296 0 Grp Bat F1cw(s),veh!hiln 1697 1585 1731 1556 1876 1535 Q Servefs-s), s 0.0 0.0 1.7 7.8 31.5 0.0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_c), 5 0.0 O'D 1,7 7.8 31,6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.Ca 1.00 Lame Grp Cap(c}, veh h 1 474 1790 1665 WC Ratio(X) 0.00 087 0.66 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 644 1790 1665 1-10M Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,x 1.00 1.00 1.170 Upstream Fiter(I) 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.90 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), shell 0.0 0.0 20.4 0.2 2,5 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 0.0 0.0 7.5 1,9 3.7 0.0 In!t al 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirtD (50°l9),vehfln 0.0 0.0 11.0 1.0 6.0 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 0.0 0.0 27.9 2.1 6,2 0.0 LnGrp LOS A C A A Appfoauh Vol, veli h 0 A 1527 1296 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 0.0 8.0 5.2 Approach LOS A A Timer -Assigned Phs 2 4 5 #� Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 127.5 0.0 9.5 118.0 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 123.0 1$.0 22.5 96.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (9_c+i1), s 9.8 0,6 3,7 33.6 Green Ext Tome fp c), s I&8. 0.0 1.0 232 fntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay r. HCl`A 6th LOS A N otes Unsignaiized Deil6y fn? [EBR SBR(is excluded from calculalioas of the a;,ptAch delay and intetsect!ar7 delay, 5,00 Pr- Brasc::,':c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7ir(l,b 2039 AM W Frot, cts d (; RUrlte} 1 -�ko Strr ! lL kc� S:r t 1 12.7721 '',, --p- ' *.-- Lane Group EBL EBT WBL 'WUBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1� T4 ' + r t ' Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 1467 55 184 896 146 Future Volume ,vphj 283 48 85 39 33 1467 55 164 896 146 Turn Type Prot NA Prot NA pv-pt NA Perm pm+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permitbad Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5,L' 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 27.0 29.5 22.5 25.0 9,5 85.0 85.0 130 88,5 85.5 Total SPI lt(%) 19.0"rG 103T° 15.0% 16.7% 6.3% 56.7% 56.7% 8.7% 59.0% 59.0% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1,{3 i.0 1.0 I.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 Q.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Norse None None None Max Max None Max Max Aot Eftct Green (s) 22:5 30.0 13.0 20.5 85.5 80.5 -80.5 92.7 85.9 B5.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.15 0.20 0.09 0.14 0.57 0.54 0.54 0.62 0.57 0.57 rrle Raba 1.14 0.33 a60 1.16 028 1.14 0.07 1.22 0.90 0.16 Control Delay 152.1 38.0 B1.2 136.8 16.8 105.9 2.1 177.4 41.9 6.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 152.1 35.0 81.2 1308 115.8 106A 2.1 177.4 41,9 6.5 LOS F to F F I3 F A F 0 A App, cauh Deiay 118.8 125,8 99.3 58.0 Approach LOS F F F E Intersection Summa C�Qle LE-ogth. 150 Actuated Cyde Length. 150 Natural Cyde: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Ac#-Unco-DA Nlaximum, vlc Ratlo:1.22 Inteisectlan Signal Nlay: 88.9 Intersectlan LOIS F Inter tion Capacity 1 JUllzatlor6 116.9% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street I '**L.t I To. I41,03 I --pe. - T 07 0a 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection S01n-ima{y 2039 AM VV Protected T; Route 11 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 1067 55 164 896 145 Future Volume ;wehih) 283 46 69 85 39 305 33 1867 55 164 896r 146 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 4 4 0 O 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.0n 1,80 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.88 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1856 3870 1870 1810 1870 1441 1821 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Gap,vehl11 297 265 116 76 245 1115 162 11T3 Arrive On Green 4.17 0.14 4.00 0.07 0.44 0.04 0.03 0.64 UQ 0.06 0.63 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 1550 1728 1856: 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Grp Sat P1cw(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 D 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 22.5 3.2 Q.a 1 a 2.9 4.0 1.0 80.5 4.0 8.5 52.4 n,4 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, s 22.5 3.2 0.0 8.8 2.9 0.0 1.0 80.5 0.0 S,5 52.4 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.b4 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 UO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehlh 297 265 116 76 245 1115 162 1173 VJC Ratio(X) 1.01 0,19 0,77 0.54 0,14 1.02 1.07 0.81 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 297 346 236 284 263 1115 162 1173 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.40 OX 1.00 1.40 4.00 1.00 1.44 4.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 56.2 51.1 (1_0 fit 1 53.5 0.0 1187 27.2 0,0 47.4 18,8 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 55.8 0.4 C1,0 10A 5.8 0.0 U.3 31.4 0.0 91.9 6.2 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 4.n 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacic=(54°l9),vehfln 14.7 1,6 0,0 3,4 1.5 Q,0 DA 43,6 0.0 7.4 23.4 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 112•0 51.5 0.0 72.4 69.3 Ob 1 B 58.7 0.0 139.3 25.0 6.0 LnGrp LOS F D E E B F F C Appfoauh Vol, veb!h 352 A 131 A 1170 A 1127 A Approach Delay, s�ve , 1L,3.3 71.5 57.5 42,6 Approach LOS F E E D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rq s 13.0 85.4 13.4 23.6 8.2 89.8 27.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8,5 8D.5 18.4 25.0 5.0 84.0 22.5 20.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 14.5 82.5 8.8 5.2 3.4 54.4 24.5 4.9 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,0 D.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 9.2 0.0 011 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 57•q HChA 6th LOS E Notes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tinlirtl,b 2039 AM VV Perrliissive (; ROLL te} 1 & _�iko'Strr t lL&ko S:r et 1 I2:772I '',, --p- ' *.-- Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT OR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1 T4 ' + r t ' Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 1467 55 184 896 146 Future Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 1067 55 164 896 146 Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA I7m4-pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 2Z5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 9.5 79.0 79.0 12.0 81,5 81.5 Total SPI rt(%) 39.3% 39.3"/� 39.3% 39.3% 6,3% 52.7'9 52.7% 8.0°a 54.3% 54.3°r'-> Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Time (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 110 1.0 1 �0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,6 41,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None Nave None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 54.5 54.5 54.5 54.5 79.5 74.5 74.5 84.9 718,9 78.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.36 0.36 D.36 0.36 0.53 0,50 0.50 0.57 0.53 0,53 vie Ratio 130 0.19 0.21 0,56 0;32 1.23 0.08 1.33 0.98 0.18 Control Delay 200.6 19.0 34.5 29,2 22.0 145.9 7.7 218.7 60.2 9.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 07 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 L),0 Total Delay 200.5 19.0 34,6 28,2 22.0 145,9 7.7 218.7 60,2 9.0 LOS F B C C G F A F E A App, cauh Delay 147.6 30,3 135.7 75.5 Approach LOS 1= C F E Intersection Summa C�ole LE-ogth. 150 Actuale�! Cycle Length. 150 Natural Cyde: 150 Control TyDe: Semi Act-Unroord Maximum vlc Ratio:1.33 Inteisectian Signal Nlay: 100.3 Interseatlnn LOS- F Inter eon CaPacify UUI izatian 115,9°4 ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intc--rsoction SUn-ima{y 2039 AM VV Permissive T; Route 11 & Lake Street /Lako Strect 1 U12.202'I NbVement EBL EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR S13L SBT $1131 Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t + r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 lH7 55 164 996 145 Future Volume ;vehih) 283 46 69 85 39 305 33 1867 55 164 896r 146 initial Q (0b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 U 0 0 Peel -Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.04 1.00 1.Oo 1,00 1.flo 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1856 3870 1870 1810 1870 1441 1811 1956 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0!94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Gap,vehl11 383 480 372 480 223 1D85 157 1133 Arrive On Green 0.26 0.26 0.00 0.26 0.26 0.110 0.03 0.5E UQ Q.06 0.51 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1364 1870 0 1341 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1858: 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1364 1870 0 1341 1870 0 1781 1870 1560 1725 1856 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 27.7 2.7 0,0 7,1 2.1 0.0 1.0 74.5 0.0 7.5 52.8 0,0 Cycle 0 Gear(g_cj, s 29.8 2.7 0.0 0.7 2,1 0.0 1.0 74.5 0.0 7,5 52.5 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 D.DD 1.40 0.00 1.00 1,40 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehih 380 480 372 480 223 10H 157 1133 VJC Ratio(X) 0.79 0.11 D,24 0.09 0,16 1.05 1.11 0.84 Avail Cap(c_a), veh+h 612 793 597 793 243 1085 157 1133 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1,0{1 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.X 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 47,6 36.5 0.0 40.2 36.3 0.0 20.0 27.4 0,0 43.4 20,0 0,0 her Delay (d2). slveh 3.6 0.1 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.3 40.3 0.0 1 U.5 7.6 0.0 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.D 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfDftD(54°l9),vehfln 97 1.3 0.0 2,A 1.0 0.0 DA 43.4 0.41 9.6 24.0 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 51.2 36.6 0.0 40.5 36.4 0.0 20.3 67.3 0.0 147.5 27.6 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D D D 1- P C Approach Vol, veli h 352 A 131 A 117D A 1127 R Approach Delay, s.,veh 49.1 39.2 65.9 46,2 Approach LOS D D E D Timer -Assigned Phs 1 .2 4 5 '� B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.0 79.0 37,5 8.1 82,9 37.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s T5 74.5 54.5 5.0 77.0 54.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 9.5 7U 31.8 3.0 54,8 11.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 0.0 1:2 0.0 8,2 0.5 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 511.5 HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tin7irtl,b 2039 HM W PrOtPOrrn (; ROLL te} 1 & -�iko Strr t lL&ko S€reet 1 IE:772I '',, --*, ! Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane CDnfiguratians fig t r t ' Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 1067 55 184 896 146 Future Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 1067 55 164 896 146 Turn Type pm+pt ISA pm -pt NA pm+pl NA Perm prn+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Qeterctad Phase 7 4 3 a w 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 9.5 22.5 9,5 22.5 M 22,5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 20,0 31.4 11.E 23.0 9,5 84.0 84,0 130 87,5 87.5 Total SPI ft (%) 14.3% 22.4" 8.3'No 16.4°fin 6.3% &0.0% 60.0% 9.3% 62.5% 62.5% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.8 7.0 1.0 1,0 1.0 110 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 O.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Recall Mode Nene Norse None None None Max Max None Max Max ActEffctGreen (s) 38.5 .26.9 25.8 18.5 84.5 79.5 79,5 91.x" 84.9 84.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0,28 0.19 0.18 0.13 0,60 0,57 0.57 0.66 0.61 0.61 vie Ratio 1.21 0.34 0,36 1.14 026 1.07 0.06 1.14 0,85 0.15 Control Delay 163,9 33.3 44.8 128.2 11.3 79.8 0.1 147.4 32.3 4.0 Queue Delay 0,0 0.0 07 0 0.0 010 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 103,9 33.3 44,8 128.2 11,3 79,5 G,1 147.4 32,3 1.0 LOS F C t} F B E A F C A App, cauh Delay 125.8 111.7 74.0 44,5 Approach LOS F F E 0 Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglthi 140 Actuated Cyde Length: 140 Natural Cyde: 140 Control Type; Semi Act-Onroord Nlaximum We Ratio: 1.21 Inteisecllon Signal Nlay: 74.4 Intersectlon LOS E Inter von Capacity IJUl zation 116.9% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intc--rsoction Srin-ima{y 2039 AM W ProtPerm T; Route 11 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 t t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 lH7 55 164 896 145 Future Volume ;vehih) 283 46 69 85 39 305 33 1067 55 164 896r 146 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 0.99 1.0D 0,98 1.00 1_QI0 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row,veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1856 3870 1870 1810 1870 1441 1611 1656 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 4.94 0,94 0,94 0.94 p.94 0,94 0!94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 6 3 2 Cap, vehlh 303 204 213 9U 290 1171 196 1234 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.11 0.00 9.06 0.04 0.00 0.03 0,63 UOQ 0.07 0.67 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 1870 15010 1725 1$513 1585 Grp V©lume(v,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Grp Sat F1ovv(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1747 1870 0 1781 1874 1560 1725 1856 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 15.5 3.2 Q.G 6.1 2.7 0.0 0.9 73,2 0.0 6.7 44.9 O,Q Cycle 0 Gear(g_c), 5 15.5 3.2 0.0 4.1 2,7 0.0 0.9 73.2. 0.0 6.7 44.9 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 DX 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.DO Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehih 303 244 213 80 290 1171 196 1234 VIC Ratio(X) 0.99 0,25 0.42 0.51: 0.12 0.47 0,69 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 303 396 213 273 310 1171 196 1234 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.110 1•Q0 1.00 1,G0 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.04 (r. DO 1.00 1.00 13.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 52.4 51.8 0.0 54.3 59.4 0.0 14.4 22.6 0,0 39.3 14.6 0,0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 49,4 0.6 C1.0 1.3 4.9 0.0 0.2 19.8 0.0 35.4 4.7 8.13 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 D.0 0.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile BacirfOftD(54°l9),vehfln 6.2 1.5 0,0 2.8 1.4 0.0 D.3 36.2 0.0 6.4 19.1 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 101.8 52.4 0.0 516 64.4 0.0 14.6 42.4 0.0 74.7 19.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS F D E E B D E L Appfeauh Vol, veb!h 352 A 131 A 117tG A 1127 A Approach Delay, s�ve}, 34.5 58.4 41.6 27.y Approach LOS F E cD C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.0 84.0 11.6 18A 8.0 89.0 20.0 10.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 8.5 79.5 7.1 28.9 5.0 83.0 15.5 16.5 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 8.7 75.2 8.1 5,2 2.9 46.9 17.5 4.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.0 3.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 9.7 0.0 0.1 tntefseclion Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 43.5 HChA 6th LOS G N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tinilr-gb 2039 AU IN 4 -Lane (; ROLL te} 1 & -�iko Strr t /Lako Street 1;,12:7721 t r ' .41 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NEL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 T4 ' int tt ' Traffic Volume (vph) 283 48 85 39 33 1007 5 184 896 146 Future Vol ume,wphj 283 48 85 39 33 1i fZ? 55 164 896 146 Turn Type Split NA Split NA pm+pl NA Perm pm-�pt NA Perm Protecled Phases x 4 P 8 5 1 6 Permibd Phases 2 2 6 6 Di3tectar Phase 4 4 6 8 w ? 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5,0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) .22.5 22.5 22,5 2Z5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (5) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 34.4 34.4 10.6 35.5 35.5 Total SPI rt(%) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 10.8'% 38.2% 38.2% 11.B'% 39,4°Ye 39,4*% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 160 1.0 1.0 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 U 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yea Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 17.1 17.1 15.5 15.5 35.0 30.0 30.0 38.7 35.1 35.1 Actuated grC Ratio 0.20 0.20 D.18 0.18 0.40 0.35 0.35 0.45 0.40 0.40 vie Ratio 0.86 0.32 0,29 0.88 0.101 0.93 4.10 0.89 0,67 0.21 Control Delay 59.5 17.0 33.4 43.1 15.8 42.7 0.3 62.2 26.0 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.5 17.0 33,4 43.1 15.a 42.7 0.3 62.2 20,0 4,5 LOS E B C D t3 a A E C A Apprcauh Delay 47.1 41.1 39.9 28.3 Approaeh LOS D 0 0 C Intersection Summa Cycle Lenglih: 90 Actuated Cycle Length; 86.8 Natural Cyde: 90 Control Type; Semi Act-Llncoord Nlaximum We Ratlo: 0,93 Inteiseclion Signal Delay-. 36.6 Intersection LOS. Q IntersDdon Capacity U61ixaton 90. ?A ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases, 71 R9ute 11 & Laka Street 1ako Street hod Toz I 00 05 1 T 06 5.00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-ima{y 2039 AM IN 4 -Lane T; Route 11 & Lako Street /Lako Strect 11!12.202'I I'4layament EBS. EBT M VVBL VVBT VVBR, NBL NBT NBR SBL BBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 1 1 T4 ft I ++ r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 283 48 59 85 39 305 33 1H7 55 164 996 145 Future Volume ;vehih) 283 45 69 85 39 305 33 1067 55 164 896r 146 Initial Q (0b), vets 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 D 0 0 0 0 Ped-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1_CI0 1,00 1.00 1,00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1. DO 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No NO No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1870 1870 1670 1856 3870 1870 1810 1870 1441 1611 1956 1870 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 301 51 0 90 41 0 35 1135 0 174 953 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 8.94 4.94 0,84 4,94 0.94 0.94 0,94 0.94 0,94 D.M Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 4 b 3 2 Cap, vehlh 351 368 136 144 303 1431 2901 1594 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.08 0,08 0.40 0.03 0.40 0.00 0.08 0.45 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 0 1781 3554 1560 1725 3526 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 301 51 G 90 41 D 35 1135 a 174 953 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1781 1870 0 1767 1870 to 1781 1777 15611 1725 1763 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 12.1 1.7 0,0 17 1.5 0.0 0.8 20.8 0.0 4,2 15,1 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_cj, s 12.1 1.7 0.0 3.7 1.5 0.0 18 20.8 0.0 4,2 15,1 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0. Dia 1.00 b.N 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0(3 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 351 368 136 144 803 1431 296 15 VJC Ratio(X) 0.86 0,14 0.66 0.29 0,12 0.79 0,59 0350 Avail Cap(c_a), veh+h 432 453 428 453 361 1431 298 1584 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,0{1 1,00 1.00 1,00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.03 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.90 0. DO 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.00 O.DO 1.00 1.00 D.DO Uniform Delay (d), slueh 28.8 24.6 0.0 33.3 32.3 0.0 13,0 10.5 0.0 15.3 15.4 0.0 hor Delay (d2). slveh 13,5 0.2 0.0 5.4 1.1 0.0 D.2 4.6 H 3.0 1.7 0.0 In!t at 0 Delay(Q) siveh 0.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Backf3ftD(541/9),vehlln 6.3 0.7 0.0 1.7 0.7 0.0 D.3 8.8 0.0 1.7 5.9 0,C, Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 42.3 24.8 0.0 38A 33.4 0.0 13.1 24.0 0.0 18.3 17.1 0.r) LnGrp LOS D C D C 8 C B B Appfcauh Vol, veil?h 352 A 131 A 117 01 A 1127 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 39.8 37.' 23.7 17.3 Approach LOS D D C B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.5 34.4 10.1 7.1 37.9 10.2 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 6.1 29.9 18.0 5.0 31.4 1$.D Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 0,2 22.8 14.1 2.6 17.1 5.7 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,0 4.3 015 0.0 5.7 0.3 tntefsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 23,5 HChA 6th LOS C Notes Unsignaiized De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tinilr.gb 2009 PM W Protected (; Rc rete} 1 _�ko Strr ! lL kca S€r et 1 12:7721 ''' --*, ' *.-- ! Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N8L NBT NBR S6L SBT SSR Lane Configurations I 1� T4 + r t Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 1060 64 202 1171 190 Future Volume (vph) 152 30 fig 40 37 1068 64 202 1171 190 Turn Type Prat NA Pkat NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Ferm Protected Phases 7 4 3 $ 5 2 1 6 Permitbad Phases 2 2 5 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 2.2.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22.5 9,5 88.0 08.0 1M 95.5 95.5 Total SPI it(%) 15.0% 15.D% 15.0% 15.0% 6.30 56.7'9 58.7°x6 11.3No 63.7% 637% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.8 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 to 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tirt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Y'e's 'yes Recall Mode None None None None Name Max Max None Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 16.5 .23.5 11.3 15.9 88.6 83.6 -83.6 100.7 93.2 93.2 Actuated grC Ratio 0.11 0.16 a.G9 0.11 0.60 0.57 0.57 0.69 0.64 0.64 vie Ratio 0,81 0.26 0.53 0,92 036 1.06 0.07 1.06 1.03 0.19 Control Delay 93.5 31.1 79.3 62.0 20.0 75.4 0.5 119.5 61.9 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 93.5 31.1 r9.j 62,0 20.0 75.4 0.5 119.5 61,9 6.1 LOS F C E E ® E A F E A App, cauh De!ay 72.3 65.5 69.5 B25 Approach LOS E E E E Intersection Summa C+Qle Leoplh. 150 Actualeo Cycle Length; 146.5 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: ,Actuated-UncoDrdinated Nlaximum 0c Ratio:1.06 Inteisectlan Signal Delay: 66k Intersectlon LOS E Intention Opacity lJt➢iization 107.2° ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases, 7: Route 11 & Laka Sweet 1ako Street 01 I 1'`02 I T L'= I --W04 OJ T L -w. I 07 1 41- 08 5:00 pm Baseline Synchs 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection SUn-ima{y 2039 PNl VV Protected T; Route 111 & Lako Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11112-2021 -� '� *� `'41 I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V t j* t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 1068 64 202 1171 190 Future Volume ;vehlh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 106.8 64 202 1171 190 Initial Q (02b), vets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1°00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1,!}0 1.0O 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1850 1870 1856 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 0 72 42 0 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? P 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 184 164 99 70 156 1222 237 1293 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.09 0.00 0.06 0.04 0.00 0.03 0.5B UQ 0.06 0.69 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 0 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 11.7 2.0 D.G 5.2 3.0 4.0 0.9 67.2 U-0 5.8 76.3 O,Q Cycle 0 dear(g_c), 5 11.7 2.0 0.0 5,2 10 0.0 0.9 67.2. 0,0 5.8 76.3 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 184 164 99 70 156 1222 237 1293 VJC Ratio(X) 0.86 0,18 0.73 0.60 0,25 0.91 0,69 0.94 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 240 256 244 250 172 1222 297 1293 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.x 1,00 1.00 1.110 1,00 1.30 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.0 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.90 0.00 1.00 1.04 4.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 58.0 55.7 0_0 61.2 62.3 0.0 23.1 19. 1 0.0 34.0 18.1 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 20.6 0.6 0.0 0,6 8.0 0.0 0.8 11.6 0.0 22.3 14.6 Q.f1 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 6.2 1,0 0.4 2.6 1.5 0.4 0.8 30.5 0.0 6.0 34.8 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 78.8 56.3 0.0 74.8 7113 0.0 28.9 30.7 0.0 56.3 32.8 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E E E i E C Apprcauh Vol, vett h 189 A 114 A 1151 A 1430 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 75.1 70.6 30.6 36.3 Approach LOS E E C L Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 12.5 91.3 11.8 16.0 8.3 05.5 18.3 9.5 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 12.5 83.5 13.0 1$,0 5.0 91.0 18.0 18.0 Max 0 Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 7.8 69.2 7.2 4,0 2.9 78.3 13.7 5.0 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.2 8.0 0.1 0.1 0:0 8.4 0.2 0.1 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 37,E HChA 6th LOS D N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, ESR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tlnilr.gb 2039 PM VV Pernilssirre (; ROLL te} 1 & -�iko Strr t lL&ko S€raet 1 12:7721 ''' --*, ' *.-- ! Large Group EBL EBT WBL WBT N8L NBT NBR S6L SBT SSR Lane CDnfiguratians I 1� T4 + r t Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 1460 64 2t}2 1171 190 Future Volume (vphj 152 30 fig 40 37 1068 64 232 1171 190 Turn Type Perm NA Perm. NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Ferm Protecled Phases 4 $ 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 Z 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 S 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# ('s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 22.5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 42.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 9.5 W.9 90,9 17.1 38,5 98.5 Total SPI rt(%) 26.0% 28.0"1 28.0% 28.0% 6.3% 60.6% 60.6% 11.41/10 165.7% 657% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 A l -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 ().0 0.1) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes. Recall Mode Nene None None None None Max Max Nene Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 37.5 37.5 37.5 37.5 91.4 86.4 88.4 103.5 RH g5.9 Actuated grC Ratio 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.61 0.58 0.58 0.69 0.64 0.64 vie Ratio 1.07 0.18 0.23 0.55 0,36 1.05 0.07 1.07 1,02 0.19 Control Delay 145.3 20.4 47.0 23.4 20.1 72.5 2.4 125.6 00.0 5.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 L,0 Total Delay 145.3 20.4 47.0 23.4 20.1 72.5 2;4 12$.6 63,G 5.2 LOS F C 13 C C E A F E A App, cauh Letay 103.0 28,2 06,9 61.8 Approach LOS I= C E E Intersection Summa C+Qle Leoplh. 150 Actualeo Cycle Length; 150 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type; ,Actuated-Unaoordinaled Maximum 0c Ratio: 1.07 Inteisectlan Signal Delay; 63.0 Intersection LOS E Interaon Capacity Utilization 107. ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases 7. Ratite 11 u Laka Street 1ako Street 31 1 142 1-004 OJ I L,.-, 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srtmmarn y 2039 PM UV Permissive T; Route 111 & Lake Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11112-2021 -� '� *� `'41 I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V t j* t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 1068 64 202 1171 190 Future Volume ;wehlh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 106.8 64 202 1171 190 Initial Q (02b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0D 1.00 1.00 1°00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1856 1870 1856 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 a 72 42 0 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0'A 0.96 0,965 0.96 0,t7f`i 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 3 2 3 £ 2 Cap, vehlh 236 289 248 282 186 1283 2611 1335 Arrive On Green 0.15 0.15 0.110 0.15 015 9.110 0.03 0.69 UC 0.05 0.71 0.00 Sat Flotia, veh h 1343 1870 0 1378 3826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 158 31 C• 72 42 0 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Grp Sat Flavv(s),veh!hiln 1343 1870 0 1378 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 15.2 1.9 0.0 62 2.6 0.0 0.8 60.8 U-0 4.5 70.6 0,4 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 17.8 1.9 U 6.1 2.6 0.0 0.8 60.8 0,0 4,5 70.6 11.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 D.DD 1.00 0.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.010 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehllh 236 289 248 282 186 1263 261 1335 VJC Ratio(X) 0.67 0,11 0.29 0. 15 0,21 0.87 D.80 0.91 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 411 533 428 520 202 1283 339 1335 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.40 1.00 1.x 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.110 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slueh 55.9 47.8 0.0 51.3 48.2 0.0 24.3 15.7 0,0 28.3 15,5 0.0 her Delay (d2). slveh 3.3 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.0 U 8.1 0,0 10.2 11.1 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.11 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehfln 5.4 0.9 0.4 2.2 12 O.0 0.7 26.2 0.0 5.5 30J 0.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 59.1 4a.0 0.0 52.0 48.4 0.0 24.8 23.7 0.0 38.5 26.6 11.0 LnGrp LOS E D D D i D C Apprcauh Vol, veil h 189 A 114 A 1151 A 1430 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 57.3 50.7 23.8 28,3 Approach LOS E D C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 6 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.3 95.5 24.9 8.3 98.5 44.g Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 12.6 86,4 37.5 5.0 94.0 37.5 Max Q Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 6.5 132.8 193 2.6 72,6 10.1 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0.3 10.9 U 10 12.1 0.4 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 29.3 HChA 6th LOS C Notes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, ESR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tln7irtl,b 2039 PM IN PFOtP rrr1 (; Route: 1 & -�IkO Strr t lL&ko S€ Set 1 12:7721 ..,, .--W ! Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET NBL NBT NBR S6L SBT SBR Lane Configuratians 1 � T. + r t Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 1460 64 2t}2 1171 190 Future Volume (vph) 152 30 69 40 37 1068 64 202 1171 190 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm -pt NA Pm+pt NA Porn prn+pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 7 4 3 a 5 2 1 6 Permibd Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Detected Phase 7 4 u 8 5 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Soli# ('s) 9.5 22,5 9,5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 14.2 26.1 1U 22,5 9.5 95.3 95.3 18.9 103.8 103.8 Total SPI ft(%) 9.5°x6 17.4'x, T.1°!u 15.0% 6.31/6 63.5% 63.5% 12.0°7n 169.2% 69.2% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tirne (s} 1.0 1.0 1.0 7.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 01.0 0.0 Total Lost Tirt!1e (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4,5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnize? 'Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes lies Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Act Effut Green (s) 29:2 19.5 22.4 15,9 95.8 90.8 90.8 108.9 101.3 101.3 Actuated grC Ratio 0,20 0.13 D.15 0,11 H5 0.61 0.61 0.74 0.68 0.68 rrle Ratio 0.97 0.31 0,34 0,92 0;36 0.98 0.07 1A0 0.96 0.18 Control Delay 115,9 31.6 54.4 62,5 19.7 51,5 0.5 1107.5 39.9 3.8 Queue Delay 01.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 o.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 11,0 Total Delay 115.9 31,6 54,4 62,5 18.7 51,15 0.5 107.5 39.9 3.8 LOS F C D E B D A F D A App, cauh Delay 87.3 60,8 47.6 44,2 Approach LOS I= E D p Intersection Summa C+Qle Leoplh. 150 Actualeo Cycle Length; 148 Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type; ,Actuared-Unaoordinaled Nlaximum ulc Rato: Inteisectlan Signal Nlay; 50,2 Intersectlon LOS D Intention Capady Utilization 107. ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 7, Route 11 & Laka Street 1ako Street 03 I �}Lit f,03 3 I � 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srin-ima{y 2039 PM W ProtPerm T; Route 111 & Lako Street 1i_LiIco Strect 11112-2021 -� '� *� `'41 I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V t j* t r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 1068 64 202 1171 190 Future Volume ;vehlh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 106.8 64 202 1171 190 Initial Q (0b), veto 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1°00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1850 1870 1856 1870 1 M Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 0 72 42 0 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,96 0,96 0. F 0.96 0,96 0.96 0.R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? P 3 2 2 Cap, vehlh 198 120 185 fig 205 1316 278 1366 Arrive On Green 0.07 0.06 0.00 0.04 0,04 0A0 0,03 0.71 U OC 0.05 D.73 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1670 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 D 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 01 1701 1826 0 1767 1856 1585 1767 1870 1585 0 Serve{s_s), s 0.T 2.1 0.0 5.3 3.1 0.0 0.8 59.2 0.0 4.4 68-9 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 97 2.1 0.0 5.3 3.1 0.0 0.8 59.2 4.0 4,4 68,9 10 Prop In Lane 1.00 OX 1.00 0.061 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-110 Lai1e Grp Cap(c}, vehih 198 120 185 69 205 1318 278 1366 VJC Ratio(X) 0.80 0,26 0.39 0.61 0,19 0.85 G,76 0 89 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 198 297 185 242 219 1316 366 1366 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.OD 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.0 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slued 59.1 50.5 C1_0 59.6 64.4 0.0 22.3 14.4 O.0 26.6 14.2 0.0 her Delay (d2), slveh 19.8 1.1 C1.0 1.3 8.3 0.0 DA 6.8 0,0 6.3 9.3 0.0 In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(50°l9),vehfln 1.9 1.1 0,0 2.5 1.6 0.0 D,7 25.4 0.0 5.4 29,2 D.0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 78.9 61.7 0.0 61.0 72.7 0.0 22.8 21.2 0.0 32.9 23.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS E E E E C C C C Approach Vol, vett h 169 A 114 A 1191 A 1430 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 76.1 65.3 21.2; 24.0 Approach LOS E E C C Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 11.2 1OG.9 10.6 13.3 8.4 103.8 14.2 g.7 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.4 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 115 961.8 6.1 21,6 5.0 99,3 9,7 18.0 Max Q Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 6.4 81.2 7.3 4.1 2.8 70.9 11.7 41.1 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 03 12.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 14.3 0.0 0.1 tntarsection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 26,41 HChA 6th LOS C N otes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, ESR, OIBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Tln7irtl,b 2039 PM VV 4 -Lane (; ROLL tc 1 & -�iko Strr t lL&ko S€raet 1 IE:772I _11 __*, r '*'-- � ! 41 Large Group EBL EBT WBL WET NEL NBT OR S6L 5BT SBR Lane Configuratians I 1-1� 1~4 TT r ++ Traffic Volume (vph) 152 30 59 40 37 1009 64 202 1171 190 Future Volume (vph) 152 30 fig 40 37 1' f38 64 202 1171 190 Turn Type Split NA Spli# NA pm+pt NA Perm pm#pt NA Perm Protecled Phases 4 4 B 8 5 1 6 Permitlad Phases 2 2 5 6 Qetectad Phase 4 4 6 8 5 2 ? 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Spli# (s) 22.5 22.5 22,5 22,5 9.5 22.5 2.2.5 9,5 22,5 22.5 Total Split (s) 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 9,5 33.2 33.2 11.8 35.5 35.5 Total SPI it(°res) 25.0% 25.D% 25.0% 25.0% 10.6% 36.9% 36.9"6 13.1'fo 39A% 39.4% Yellow Time (s) 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.5 15 3.5 All -Red Tim (s} 1.0 1.0 110 160 1.0 I'D 1:0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Tim (s} 4.5 4,5 4,5 4.5 4,5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4,5 4.5 Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optirnlze? Yes Y Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None None None Max Max None Max Max Apt Eflut Green (s) 12.1 12.1 9.7 91 34.0 29.0 29.0 39.7 35.5 35.5 Actuated grC Ratio 0.16 0.16 Q.13 0.13 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.52 0.46 0,46 vie Ratio 6,57 0.26 0.32 4.69 0;19 0.84 10.10 0.82 0.74 0.24 Central Delay 39.1 16.7 34.5 16.611 13.6 37.4 0.7 43.6 23.8 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 a.0 0.0 17,0 Total Delay 39.1 16.7 34.6 116,5 13.6 30.4 03 43.6 23,6 3.9 LOS D B C B E C A D C A App, cauh Deiay 31.5 2,0.2 28.3 23.9 Appreaeh LOS C C C C Intersedan Summa Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length; 76.4 Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type; ,Actuated-Uno+ ofdinated Maximum ulc Ratio: 0.84 Intersection Signal delay; 25,8 Intersectlan LOS: C Inter tion Capacity UUlizaaton K6% ILLI Level of 5eNcc D Analysis Period (min) 15 and Phases: 7: Route 11 u Laka Street )Laky Street 5:00 pm Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 H M 6th Signalized Intersection Srtn-ima{y 2039 PM W 4-Lar1e T; Route 111 & Lake Street /Laico Stre:ct 11112-2021 I'4layament EBI_ EBT EBR VVBL VVBT VVBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 14 1 T V ft j* tT r Traffic Volume (vehfh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 1058 64 202 1171 190 Future Volume ;wehlh) 152 30 48 69 40 232 37 106.8 64 202 1171 190 Initial Q (02b), vete 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 Peel-BikeAdj(A_pbT) 1,00 1.0a 1.00 1.00 1°00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Elus. Ad} 1.00 1.00 1.Do 1,00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Work Zane On Approach No No No No 04 Sat Row, veh1hin 1841 1870 1670 1870 1826 1626 1855 1855 1670 1856 1870 187 Adj Ebur Rate,. vehlh 158 31 0 72 42 0 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0,06 0,96 0. F 0.96 0,965 0.96 0.R 0,96 Percent Heavy Veh, % 4 2 2 2 5 5 3 ? P 3 £ 2 Cap, vehlh 211 225 120 123 285 1563 366 1761 Arrive On Green 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.07 0,07 DAA 0.04 0.44 O.00 0A9 0.50 0.00 Sat Flow, veh h 1753 1870 0 1781 1826 0 1767 3525 1555 1767 3554 1585 Grp Volume(,.,,. vehfh 158 31 G 72 42 D 39 1112 0 210 1220 0 Grp Sat P1ow(s),veh!hiln 1753 1870 0 1701 1826 0 1767 1763 1585 1767 1777 1585 Q Serve{s_s), s 5.6 1.0 0.0 2.5 1..4 0.0 0.8 1616 4.0 3.9 17.1 0.0 Cycle 0 dear(g_c), s 5,8 1'0 0.0 2.5 1.4 0.0 0.8 16.5 0.0 3,9 17,11 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.00 1.00 O.N 1.00 1.00 1.00 1-110 L.ai1e Grp Cap(c}, veh/h 211 225 120 123 285 1563 366 1701 VJC Ratio(X) 0.75 0.14 0.60 0.34 0,14 0.71 G,57 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), vWh 488 520 495 500 353 1563 405 1761 HOM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1,x 1,00 1.00 1.110 1.40 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.417 1.00 Upstream Fiter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.170 1,00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.DO 1.00 1.00 0.00 Uniform Delay (d), slveb 273 29.5 0-0 29.3 28.8 0.0 10.5 14.6 0'C 11.6 12,5 0,0 Mor Delay (d2). slveh 5.3 0.3 0.0 4.8 1.6 0.0 0.2 2.8 0,0 1.6 2.3 U In!t at 0 Del ay(d3),srveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1) .0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °dile Bacir=(54°l9),vehfln 2.6 DA 0,0 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 6.4 0.0 1.4 6.3 0:0 Unsig, Movement Delay, slveh Ln Grp Delay{d),slveh 32.8 25.8 0,0 34.1 30.4 0.0 10.. 17.4 0.0 13.2 14.8 0.0 LnGrp L05 C C C C 8 B B B Appcauh Vol, vett h 189 A 114 A 1191 A 1430 A Approach Delay, s.,veh 31.7 32.7 17.2 14.6 Approach LOS C C 0 B Timer -Assigned Phs 1 2 4 5 6 B Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 10.4 33.2 12,3 7.0 36.6 8.9 Change Period (1'+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Man Green Salting (Gmax}, s 7.3 28.7 18.0 5.0 31,0 18.0 Max Q Cleat Time (g_o+11), s 5.9 18.6 7.6 2.8 19.1 4.5 Green Ext Tome (pc), s 0,1 5.5 0.4 0.0 6.7 0.3 Intersection Summary HCC 6th. Ctrl Delay 17.5 HChA 6th LOS B Notes UnsignaiiZed De716Y fn? [NI BR, EBR, OiBR, SBR} is exclWed from cal eulatrans of the approa01 delay and inter sectoo delay. 5,00 Pr- Bnsc:;e°:c� Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service; NB RCrite 11 2039 AM W Segment LOS 10.25-2021 Arterial Flow RiAnaing Signal Travel Dist Arlerlal Arterial Cross Streei Clay SOO Tift EX10Y TimeW (mi) Speed LOS Lako Street 1111 30 63,2 106.9 171x.1 0153 1111 E Purrpuaanui Si 111 30 1117.5 :30.2 137.7 M, () 23.4 C Total III 170,7 137,1 307.6 1,42 1616 D Arterial Level of Service: SB Rotate 11 Arterial Floe Running 5jgral Travel Gist Arterial Arterial Gross Sircet Glass speLd Time Dof ay Time {s; m , Speed I +7 PuHpu;3anui S1 111 30 04.3 .23.5 117.5 0.79 24,0 B I aka Street III 3G 107,5 4',9 149,4 0,90 21,6 C Total 5.00 pm Baseline 201.8 65.4 267.2 1.68 22.7 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Arterial Level of Service Arterial Level of Service; NB Rorlte 11 2039 PM W Segment LOS 10.25-2021 Arterial Flaw RiAnaing, Signal Travel Dist Arlerlai Arterial Cro" s eeil Ciass Sqqed Tito lklbY Time (s) (mi) Speed LOS Lako Street 111 30 63,2 75.E 136.5 153 137 B Puripii -�nui Si III MG 1177.5 22.6 1M. M, () 24.8 B Total 111 170.7 98,0 265,7 1,42 19.1 C Arterial Level of Service: SB Rotate 11 Arterial Floe Running Signal Tavel Dist Arterial ArteMl Gross Sircet Glass speLd Time Delay Time {g} (m0, Spew W' Puapu;3anui S1 III 3G 94.2 43:5 138.0 0.79 23.5 C I..akn Street III 3G 107,5 61.9 169A 0,90 19.0 C Total 5.00 pm Baseline 201.7 105.7 307.4 1.68 13.7 C Synchro 10 Report Page 1 p �.•'� aS � p ��" Y#. 77 iti 1Yk 3 , Ir:� � Ard - !rye �. STATF OF H -%NVAI I Il1.iIWI� 11 NI 01 1 5ND %ND N '1, 11 R%I M•.Sfa W 1.4 1111, Jk lR l f'RF!.E RVATl(I% 11"'1 1411'\ t.. �F.I 1 141 IL Dl'm' I, ti%I1 1x.11 1 1451 1'U 1 1 Ir. VA k %V; 1 I I I I 1 A 11L g67U7 August 19, ?019 114+` 1:.114: 1411c�;1�1ck Komi. 1 hrec, l;_LC I I l llralalai St. Hil().1Il 14,7111 Dear Mr. Wheelock. YL f.%',% LI 1 MI, 11 • M ! 1-i...• 1-06 N ( )' N)19,0113 3 DOC INO: 1908)('03 SUBJECT: DRAFT Burial Treatment Plan for Burial Site 93 Located in Holualfia Ill Ahopua`a, North Kona District, Wand of 1fa%lai'i. 'ENIK: 131 7-6-021.017. .-'4t its natiL1ahk on AlrIuSt 15, -,019. Ille Il:Ltwtl"i C'4btutril 01111C) oil a rc4+.alnIll cIldilii{Ill LO 11AVC the State llistor•ic Presertaliori D-16, on 1S1-1PM acc_cpt the above DK 11=-1 lull i,Ll I reatinent Plan. This lillloww, , the HIBC cicte.rinination to preserve, in place made at lis prcr ideas inect ng 11,0(i No. 20 19.01323, DOC NO. 1908,1('01), k- l loaf , ine, the recommendation 111- the H 1130. the 1.)R-4 FTBurial 77.E arrrrc w Ph w ror h'rr r, rr' .�rrL Loc•afcii ial IfIV010100 IN-01201)lf,1 W-d,ix kIA)I,r f?iE1+•ic.'1, /%!Ir1'r101 iier lf. r, 1.tII 1.3 - 0-0"",01-i�.LL;��1,r�1l1�, theS3IF'f]. F'Icrtseehttngethe ti:lc I,rn:_tm.t�C ;:{ 1,� 'I�111 11 s Burial 1-rc,,tment Pla411" lea "FL1r1,:1 Site Component of a Preservation Mali— and aLJNIlit h3 Li'd copies wiih ti cop) of this Ionia and a text-searchabic I'DF° CD to hath. 17irr Hal olci 1111Ll 11110 offices. ShoWd you hiixc min additional questinitis or concerns, please corltactour flawlai'i Island 1illri.11 it4 peclaliwt, Kw.L (. alpito at t908) 430-5709 or via email tri lc�rdan.l'.('a!�►itc�;'c7'llauaii.�?L>� . tiilltic1til"". Mr. 1 -I -Mann Rodr1+r3l,, 11.:1_. J.U. M.4Iorl' 4� t_ +2dirm." Branch i. J1�c11 C"C": Glenn Escott. SCS Inc, Planning Dept. Exhibit 2 SCS 2137 -FINAL BURIAL SITE COMPONENT OF A PRESERVATION PLAN FOR BURIAL SITE #50-10-57-30593 LOCATED IN HOLUALOA 1sT AHUPUA`A, NORTH KONA DISTRICT, ISLAND OF HAWAII, HAWAII [TMK: (3) 7-6-021:0171 Prepared by: Glenn Escott, M.A. And Nicole A. Mello, M.A. AUGUST 2019 1�:U Prepared for: Kona Three, LLC 101 Hualalai St. Hilo, HI 96720 SCIENTIFIC CONSUl.'1',AN] SEHN9C:E's lire. 1347 Kapi`olani Boulevard, Suite 408 Honolulu, 111 96814 Hawaii Island Office: PO Box 155 Kea`au, H196749 Planning Dept. Exhibit 2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................. I LISTOF FIGURES........................................................................................................................II LIST OF TABLES.......................................................................................................................... II INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING.....................................................................................................1 HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS............................................................................7 PRE -CONTACT ERA........................................................................................................ 9 TheKona Field System......................................................................................... 10 POST -CONTACT ERA.................................................................................................... 11 THEMAHELE................................................................................................................. 13 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGY.....................................................................................................17 AIS SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS.......................................................................................20 BURIAL SITE 30593 DESCRIPTION............................................................................ 21 BURIAL SITE COMPONENT OF A PRESERVATION PLAN.................................................23 PRESERVATION TREATMENTS..............................................................................................24 REFERENCES CITED..................................................................................................................30 APPENDIX A: SHPD AIS APPROVAL LETTER......................................................................35 APPENDIX B: PUBLIC NOTICES...............................................................................................A I LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: 5,500 K -Series Map of Hawaii Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo!, 2003. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS)........... 2 Figure 2: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of AIS Project Area and Burial Site 30953 (Kailua Quad, ESRI, 2013. Data Sources: National GeographicSociety, USGS)........................................................................................... 3 Figure 3: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of AIS Archaeological Sites (Kailua Quad, ESRI, 2013. Data Sources: National GeographicSociety, USGS)........................................................................................... 4 Figure 4: Portion of TMK Map (3) 7-6-021 Showing Location of Parcel 017 and Site 30593 Railroad Bed (County of Hawaii Planning Department 2017) ..................................... 5 Figure 5: Aerial Photograph of AIS Project Area and Burial Site (Shaded Orange), H6lualoa, HI, Zone 5 North, 189445 in E, 2171790 in N. (Google Earth, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and US.) .................. 6 Figure 6: Map of H61ualoa 1st and 2nd Ahupua`a Showing Location of Project Area in Red Border (Alexander 1855)................................................................................................ 8 Figure 7: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Railroad and Project Area (USGS 1928)...................................................................... 12 Figure 8: Portion of Kailua Section, North Kona Map Showing Location of LCA 7713 and Project Area in Red Border (Aki 1952)........................................................................ 14 Figure 9: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Land Commission Awards, Land Grants, and the Project Area (National Geographic Topo!, 2003, Kailua Quad. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS)...... 15 Figure 10: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Locations of Escott and Escott (2018) AIS Project Area Archaeological Sites (ESRI, 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle) .................................. 19 Figure 11: Site 30593 Plan View Map (Escott and Escott 2018:56) ........................................... 22 Figure 12: Sites 30593 Preservation Buffers Plan View Map (adapted from Escott and Escott2016:55)............................................................................................................. 25 Figure 13: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Locations of Site 30593 Access (ESRI, 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle).................................................................................................................. 26 Figure 14: Aerial Photograph of Burial Site (Shaded Orange) and Pedestrian Access Easement, Holualoa, HI, Zone 5 North, 189445 in E, 2171790 in N. (Google Earth, 2013 Image. Data Sources: Digital Globe, GeoEye, Earthstar, USDA, and US.)............................................................................................................................... 28 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Land Commission Awards Recorded in H61ualoa 1st and 2nd Ahupua`a...................... 16 Table 2: Inventory of Archaeological Sites Identified on the AIS Project Area (Escott and Escott2018).................................................................................................................. 18 11 INTRODUCTION As requested by the Hawaii State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) in a letter dated May 31, 2018 (Log No. 2018.01123, Doc No. 1805SN05) (Appendix A), Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS) produced this Burial Site Component of a Preservation Plan (BSCPP) for a pre -Contact era to early post -Contact burial Site #50-10-57-30593 (hereafter referred to as Site 30593) located on a portion of TMK: (3) 7-6-021:017 located in Holualoa 1st Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii, Hawaii (Figure 1 through Figure 5). The project area is bounded on the north and west by undeveloped cattle pasture, on the south by a seasonal gulch, and on the east by developed residential and farm land (see Figure 5). The project area lands were used for cattle pasture and agriculture from the early 1900s to the present. The purpose of this BSCPP is to provide the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) and the Hawaii Island Burial Council (HIBC) information necessary to make a determination regarding the disposition of, and preservation measures for, the burial at Site 30593. This report contains information on the project area environmental, historical, and cultural setting; archaeological documentation for both sites; a summary of consultation with recognized cultural and lineal descendants; and short-term and long-term preservation measures, including access terms and easements. The BSCPP was written under contract to the property owner. The property is owned by Kona Three, LLC. The contact person for Kona Three, LLC is Mr. Richard Wheelock. Mr. Wheelock can be reached by phone (808) 753-3167, and by email (richard@eastwestrealty.org). His mailing address is 101 Hualalai St. Hilo, HI 96720-4703. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Site 30593 is a single burial in a lava tube located at 610 feet above mean sea level (amsl) near the southeast corner of Parcel 017. The site is situated on a western facing slope, among koa haole and trees with Guinea grass ground cover. The property is a portion of a larger former cattle ranch and agricultural area dating to the early 1900s through the early modern era. The makai (western) portion of the property is still used to pasture cattle. Portions of the property were bulldozed sometime between the 1950s and 1970s. Evidence of bulldozing is visible in aerial photographs as alternating bands of cleared bulldozer tracks and bands of push pile (see Figure 5). Pedestrian survey confirmed the linear bands in the aerial photographs are bulldozer - cleared paths and linear piles of bulldozed rock along the cleared bulldozer paths. Figure 1: 5,500 K -Series Map of Hawaii Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo!, 2003. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS). T H A W A I T T •• i s,wr adww.r, SHA. VYA11 C'01 - 1 z .- n t „ �n .. iS k, I 3 1 r s+" r rt MAA $91ic4Q gp.[vUou-if ] FNcmE :Ij'xmk—I=i'F=�:'�F .II' '.—}� :3? . ! ;yyr,,l4 Ir. :,s marl 1fJ h Ih I� 5' M 4h ol5►r Figure 1: 5,500 K -Series Map of Hawaii Showing Location of Project Area (National Geographic Topo!, 2003. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS). M L BITE 3W%I. 305% � + f 5I"! F 02 a SI'f I+' 10),M) ■ 1i K FA, -MTF BBL-NDARY — HAIVR[7AD I3I:1? i — KOC 'Ir:1s AL L I IZ IF 2rh 40 till 80 METERS fC 3L S3 f C. 3s1t03 SITE MW04 SITE: 39-193 SITE 3060!; SrIT 501599 SUE N�00 !;I"I'E 30612 SITE 300r, S"17'!?•306IC) SITE 3059$ SITE 3NI I. SITE 3060 :B!'I'E- 7059" l ti Figure 3: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of AIS Archaeological Sites (Kailua Quad, ESRI, 2013. Data Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS). C! � I Alt y SITE 30593 i . KEY PARCEL 017 - BURIAL n 1p ,r � f � yyi�4, ..FaJr f cHi�yy�.f•( � yJ �,.,.+r Y. �i. �,-J�}� i I ti ;Pf J .. v � Y -�: Figure 4: Portion of TMK Map (3) 7-6-021 Showing Location of Parcel 017 and Site 30593 Railroad Bed (County of Hawaii Planning Department 2017). 5 W U- The project area ground surface is a Hualalai lava flow dating between 5,000 and 10,000 years before present (ybp) (Wolfe and Morris 1996). Soil in the project area is Punalu`u Series (rPYD series) extremely rocky peat with six to twenty percent slopes (Sato 1973:48). The majority of the project area has been bulldozed in the past and the present ground surface is rocky soil. Rainfall in the project area is very low, less than thirty inches per year. There is a seasonal gulch along the southern edge of the project area. This region is extremely dry, hot, and somewhat barren except for thick California grass (Urochloa mutica), Guinea grass (Megathyrsus maximus), and some koa haole (Leueaena leucocephala), kiawe (Prosopis pallida), and kukui nut (Aleurites moluccana) trees (Starr Environmental 2016). HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL CONTEXTS Kona is divided into two sections: North Kona or Kona `dkau, and; South Kona, or Kona hema (Maly 1996). Kona `dkau was further subdivided into north (called Kekaha) and south (called Konakai opua) areas, with the division between the two at the ahupua `a of Keahuolu. The project area is in H61ualoa 1st Ahupua`a (Figure 6) within the area of Kona kai `opua in Kona `dkau. H61ualoa means (literally) "long sled course" (Pukui et al. 1974:48). H61ualoa 1st is a traditional ahupua `a stretching from the ocean to the foot of Hualalai in the uplands. The coastline of H6lualoa 1st Ahupua`a is primarily low rock cliffs. Very little is recorded of H61ualoa Ahupua`a in traditional oral accounts. The Heart Stirring Legend of Ka-Miki, published in the Hawaiian language newspaper Ka Hoku o Hawaii and translated by Maly (1993) contains the only description of H6lualoa. The legend is set in the 13t" century but also reflects more recent influences (Maly and Maly 2002:17). 7 +fi N a 1 fis �r'Sn ER According to the narrative, The lands of H6lualoa were named for the chief of that name; both H61ualoa and Puapua`a were high chiefs, who controlled the lands from mountain to sea, which bear their names... Kaluaokalani served as a priest of H61ualoa at the temple of Pakiha. This heiau was near the contest field of H61ualoa... The lands of this region are named for various ali `i, all of whom were related. When the chief H61ualoa took up the challenge against Kepaka`ili`ula on behalf of the Kona chiefs, H61ualoa called upon his god Kalaipahoa to assist him in his battle... H61ualoa was the first chief to call upon the god Kalaipahoa, and this was the beginning of this god's use by the chiefs of Hawaii [Maly 1993:208-209]. PRE -CONTACT ERA H6lualoa, Kona, and much of the leeward side of Hawaii Island, while well populated at the time of European Contact, were settled later than the windward side. This in part may be due to the fertile land, numerous streams, and abundant rainfall on the windward side (Maly 1996:3). Many archaeologists believe that Hawaii Island was first settled around A.D. 1,000 by people sailing from the Marquesas (Athens et al. 2014; Dye 2011; Kahn et al. 2014; Kirch 2011; Kirch and McCoy 2007; McCoy 2005 and 2007; Mulrooney et al. 2011; Reith et al. 2011; Wilmhurst et al. 2011a and 2011b). During early settlement of the leeward side permanent habitations were established in Kona concentrated along the shoreline and lowland slopes (Cordy 1981, 1995; Schilt 1984). Informal fields were cleared at higher elevations where rainfall was higher. Between AD 1200 and 1400, habitation and agriculture expanded across the slopes and coastal area of Hualalai (Burtchard 1995; Cordy 1995). The initial construction of the Kona Field System (KFS) began approximately between AD 1400 to 1600 (Schilt 1984). The development of these extensive formal walled fields coincides with a dramatic population increase and with the development of the stratified chiefdom structure which is reflected through large residential complexes and heiau (Burtchard 1995; Cordy 1981; Haun et al. 1998; Hommon 1986; Schilt 1984). Thus, there was a need to expand the previously limited agricultural base. The royal centers and larger heiau were in place by AD 1600 to 1800 which reflect the growth in power of the rulers and chiefs in the region (Barrera 1971; Hammatt and Folk 1980). Royal centers are located at Kailua, H61ualoa, Kahalu`u, Kealakekua, and H6naunau (Cordy 1995). C The region of H61ualoa developed into a royal center in the late 1600s to early 1700s under the reigns of Keakamahana (reigned 1680-1700) and Keakealaniwahine (reigned 1700-1720) (Cordy 2000:244). Many `ali `i and konohiki residences and numerous religious sites are known to have existed here. The majority of the heiau and royal residences were constructed along or near the coast, most notably at Kamoa Point south of the project area. The royal center at Holualoa was eclipsed in the second half of the 1700s by the royal center in the Kahalu`u and Keauhou region. The Kona Field System The Kona Field System extends north at least to Kau Ahupua`a and south to H6naunau, west from the coastline and east to the forested slopes of Hualalai (Cordy 1995). During his travels in 1823, William Ellis noted the extensive field system divided with "low stone walls, made of fragments of lava", producing "bananas, sweet potatoes, mountain taro, tapa trees, melons and sugar cane" and "flourishing luxuriantly in every direction" (Handy and Handy 1940:114 and 162). Many of the archaeological projects conducted within Kona deal with components of the Kona Field System (Cordy 1995; Newman 1970; Schilt 1984). The kula zone of the Kona Field System is from sea level to 150 in amsl. This zone is associated with habitations along the shoreline and cultivation of sweet potatoes (uala), paper mulberry (wauke), and gourds (ipu). Clearing mounds, planting depressions, planting mounds, planting terraces, and modified outcrops are common agricultural features in the kula zone (Hammatt and Clark 1980; Hammatt and Folk 1980; Haun et al. 1998; Schilt 1984). Permanent habitation including royal and high chiefly centers as well as non-agricultural activities such as fishing, ceremonies and burial practices were usually concentrated along the shoreline zone portion of the kula zone. The higher elevation zones are the kalu `ulu zone, `apa `a zone and the `ama `u zone. The current project area is in the kalu `ulu zone. This wetter region is above 150 in ams] where bread fruit, sweet potatoes (Ipomoea batatas), ki, (Cordyline fruticosa) wauke (Broussonetia papyrifera), kayo (Colocasia esculents), sugar cane (Saccharum sp.), and other arboreal crops were grown (Kelly 1983, Menzies 1920). The `apa `a zone is above the kalu `ulu zone. Hawaiians cultivated melons, sweet potatoes, ti, bananas, taro, wauke and sugar cane in fields with low stone walls. The highest zone, the `ama `u zone, was used to grow bananas and plantains in walled fields. The `apa `a zone and the `ama `u 10 zone were also used to collect timber and catch birds therefore temporary habitations were constructed. POST -CONTACT ERA During the post -contact era, the Kona Field System was exploited and the planting of coffee, sugar, sisal, citrus, and cotton took over original Hawaiian crops until eventually the land was used for cattle pasture. The first cattle and sheep were brought to the island by Vancouver in 1793 and 1794 (Vancouver 1967). Horses, mules, oxen, goats, and donkeys were brought shortly after. Feral cattle, sheep, and goats overran agricultural fields by 1813 to 1815 (Ellis 1963: 291; Wilkes 1970: 204). By 1848, in the Kona District, a Great Wall (the Kuakini Wall) was constructed from Lanihau to `Onouli to keep them away from homes and agricultural areas (Maly and Maly 2001:286). Formal cattle ranching began in the Kona region in the mid -1800s. The Kona landscape evolved rapidly with the turn of the century. The rapid growth of the sugar industry produced the Kona Sugar Company in 1899. A railroad was built in 1901 to help sustain this influx in produce. It was later used to haul lumber and freight along with the sugarcane. The rail line was seven miles long and extended from H61ualoa to Ka`awaloa (Figure 7). Cotton, tobacco, and sisal were grown in the dryer lands below the railroad (Kelly 1983). The changing subsistence and trade regimes developed by incoming European and American settlers, as well as other historical factors, caused a depopulation of the coastal areas of Kona. Ranches were established at middle and upper elevations, and farms were established in the uplands where rainfall was higher and the temperatures were cooler. Cattle ranching and clearing for sugar cane and coffee removed many of the endemic species of plants. The suite of vegetation that existed prior to the pre -Contact era were replaced by koa haole (Leucaena leucocephala), kiawe (Prosopis pallida), and other newly introduced invasive plant species. 11 ... �e `. t • y i, .l . ', �x �jY .'y yl,ulwwrNr .,. 13 s'x ,3 i xt rinxLxL �Y' c a �• v r H4 d Ili ki , 417 1% 1, f", lP`T{ ,1. :fi f .wri..�aL� h � �� � �x I"I S5P l tl FY N " ' nYW 44 Am e 14mnwlr �t3�x I!'7� ,M� P. Tom. Figure 7: Portion of 15 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Location of Railroad and Project Area (USGS 1928) 12 Schools, churches, stores, and other businesses were also established in the uplands. During the late 1800s and early 1900s, coastal Kona was no longer the densely populated sociopolitical center it once was. It became a small cluster of houses along the trail from Kailua Bay to Keauhou (Tomonari-Tuggle 1993:15). Homesteads, ranches, and plantations developed in the uplands during this period as reflected in the pattern of Land Commission Awards (LCA) and Land Grants (LG) recorded during the Mahele (Escott and Escott 2018). The project area is just makai (west) of most of the land commission awards and is at the same elevation as portions of the land grants in the region. Based on historic documents, the project area and surrounding lands were likely being used for subsistence and commercial agriculture, as well as for cattle pasture from the mid to late 1800s. The project area might have been used later than surrounding lands because of its steep slopes and very rocky soil, but based on aerial photographs, the project area was bulldozed sometime around the 1950s through the 1970s in preparation for commercial agriculture. THE MAHELE The Land Commission awarded the majority of Holualoa I" and 2nd Ahupua`a to Victoria Kamamalu Ka`ahumanu IV, Kuhina Nui of Hawaii Island and Crown Princess of Hawaii as Land Commission Award (LCA) Number 7713, `Apana 43 (Figure 8). Several smaller LCA and LG properties were also recorded in the upland region of Holualoa I" and 2nd Ahupua`a (Figure 9). Twenty four Land Commission awards were recorded in H61ualoa 1st Ahupua`a, the ahupua`a where the project area is located (Table 1). All but two of the LC awards (LCA #3660 to Munn and LCA #7713 to Kamamalu) were mauka (east) of the current project area. With the exception of these LC awards, the average award was 2.8 acres, most (n=16) were for less than 3.0 acres. Three Land Grants (LG #1592, 1602, and 363 0) were also recorded in H6lualoa 1st and 2nd Ahupua`a. LG #1592 was a 25.0 -acre parcel sold to Kealalio and LG #3630 was a 38.2 -acre parcel sold to W.H. Cromwell. Almost all of the awards and grants were used as subsistence and commercial farm land, and some were used to pasture cattle (Escott and Escott 2018). 13 It ti jE 1 l4 ! TS•5 � y � t 1 q � +, 7. R 5 � �Y �I, .� 'S _' U '+ `r j � `' �:`� 1.'1 "� ' ��' 3 1�,"�ti', by �' •'4 �y '� T �+ � �ti'+ � � }�� �r � I I �;� int 'k'4 •t .% ti }t � # ���•.� o-�5� �� Q t-,1 �`ya s � .k 1 � :P � � t '4; it ', y,t � Q �`�? Y.r}i,�tl�.�f, `,v15 �i-IL i �. �4 dd33d3d3fyyyy�r , a I Table 1: Land Commission Awards Recorded in H61ualoa 1st and 2na Ahupua`a. LCA# AWARDED TO AHUPUA`A ACRES 3660 John G. Munn H6lualoa 1" 111.5 4395 Kekoi Holualoa 1" 1.7 5552 Kauila Holualoa 1st 1.9 5554 Keawekolohe Holualoa 1st 11.27 5795 Keliikanakaole Holualoa 2n 2.2 5810 Kaopukauila H61ualoa 1st 1.74 5993 Leipalapala H61ualoa 2nd 2.0 6063 Hana Holualoa 1" 2.9 6107 Naai H6lualoa 1" 3.94 7339 Kuaana H61ualoa 1" 4.15 7340 Kama 2 H61ualoa 1" 2.5 7340:13 Kama 1 H61ualoa 1" 1.3 7443 Kalima as Holualoa 1st 1.94 7713 Kamamalu H61ualoa 1s'& H6lualoa 2 Large 7746 Kamahalo H61ualoa 1st 5.0 7794 Kauakini Holualoa 1" 1.8 7990 Pu uka H61ualoa 1st 1.1 8015 Aipo H61ualoa 2 nd 1.4 8151 Hehena H61ualoa 1st 2.3 8223 Ikaiaka H61ualoa 1" 3.5 9915 Limahana Holualoa 1" 2.42 9932 Lumaawe Holualoa 1" 2.98 10770 Puuone H6lualoa 1" 3.06 10400 Naaimakaohi 1461ualoa 1 s &3.5 Holualoa 2 1< PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGY SCS conducted an AIS study on a 5.0 -acre portion of Parcel 017 (Escott and Escott 2018) and recorded twenty-two new archaeological sites within the project area (Table 2 and Figure 10). Fifteen of the sites are single -feature sites. The remaining seven agricultural sites contained two to seven features. A majority of the sites are agricultural terraces and complexes dating between the pre -Contact era to the Historic era. The agricultural complexes are located in the lower kalu `ulu zone, between 600 and 700 feet (182 to 213 meters) amsl. Three of the ranch walls (Site 30595, 30601, and 3065) are the primary dividers of the five -acre project area. These Historic era walls have typical characteristics of ranch walls including cobble core fill and bi-faced inward sloping walls toward the top. They are approximately 1.0 meter tall. Site 30602 and Site 30603 are Historic era ranching and agricultural enclosures constructed along wall Site 30595 and wall Site 30601. These two wall sites are constructed onto the west edge of the Site 30592 railroad berm and post-date the railroad berm. The northern third of the project area only has two sites (Site 30591 and 30956). Site 30591 is an agricultural complex with six terraces. Portions of the sites were bulldozed in the early Modern era. Both sites date to pre -Contact to early Historic era. The terraces reflect Kona Field System features but are roughly constructed that more closely resemble Historic era commercial agriculture. Site 30956 is a rectangular Historic style hearth. The middle one third of the project area between wall sites 30595 and 30605 is within the bulldozed "terraces" portion of the project area. Site 30593 is a pre -Contact era to early post -Contact era lava tube burial. The burial will be preserved in place in accordance with a Burial Site Component of a Preservation Plan. Site 30594 is an agricultural terrace complex that resembles the Kona Field System but is more roughly constructed. Artifacts recovered from subsurface testing at Site 30604 suggest it is a Historic era agricultural terrace. 17 iii W iii iii icy ct W W W W W W W W O O O O O O O O cz cz cz cz a> o U o u v u U U U U U U u y U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1F-V--lII 11--V--]II f/-11 y �FV] �I'A C�In XIVII �1V] U 11--V--]II y y �IV]I �1V]I U U X1VII O O O O O O O U rr0l Q �I h+l h+l h1 h+l h+l h+•1 h1 N bbA u � ay. • � ay. bA c+ -C dfi � . � � bA U U � , � , � � y y � � v bA;t� to bA bA bA Q = u v v U U v v bA 7 r bA OA to to bA tp OA bA bAcz y t• U w CC C � W U � � N J o� O O c��C x 't 0 0 73 F4 o W W W W a .to .to l cz -- N MV � OG O\ O ^� N M�� �o r OC 01,O N O\ O� Ol a\ d � d\ 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 .4 ld1;91 s i'r h 3(15 SITI? 30593 SITE 30WA arlp KEY - PT2ONC.-TARF:A til'I`F: SITE BOUNDARY RATLROAD BED I - ROCK WALL TN N 411 60 811 NI1FT Rti fiITE 3i3&M ITE 30;92 ' SITE 306119 SITE 306 12 SITS. 3i M07 tiI FE 3i65 "ITE 30547 0 ti!7`1�:311l�8 SI IT 111 511'E 30600 98 41 Tk� 311611 Figure 10: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Locations of Escott and Escott (2018) AIS Project Area Archaeological Sites (ESRI, 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle). 19 The southern third of the project area, south of wall Site 30605, contained six primarily agricultural sites (Site 30598, 30600, 30606, 30607, 30610, and 30611) and four Historic era sites (Site 30599, 30608, 30609, and 30612) with functions other than agriculture. The agricultural features included rock walls (Site 30598 and306O6), terraces (Site 30600 and 30610), and agricultural complexes with terraces (Site 30607 and 30610). The non-agricultural features included three enclosures (Site 30599, 30608, and 30609), and a refuse disposal area lava blister (Site 30612). The cluster of these sites indicates their use for Historic era commercial agriculture. Twenty-nine shovel probes and two excavation units tested the sites. Marine shell fragments, a basalt flake and volcanic -glass flakes recovered during testing indicate that Hawaiians likely used the area for limited agricultural purposes. However, the agricultural terraces more closely resemble the remains of Historic era commercial agriculture. AIS SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENTS All 22 sites identified during the current AIS study were assessed significant under criterion "d" as they are likely to yield information important to history. The railroad berm is also significant under criteria "a" and "c" as it is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history and it embodies distinctive characteristics of the type, period, and method of railroad bed construction. The railroad berm is recommended for preservation with preservation measures outlined in an archaeological preservation plan to be prepared for review and approval by SHPD. The rest of the sites require no further work. The burial is also significant under criterion "e" as it has important value to Hawaiian people and people of other ethnic backgrounds in the state. The burial is recommended for preservation in place with preservation treatments outlined in this BSCPP. Site 30593 is summarized below from Escott and Escott (2018:53-57). 20 BURIAL SITE 30593 DESCRIPTION Site 30593 is a pre -Contact to early post -Contact era burial located in a lava tube at 610 ft amsl along the central western portion of the project area, immediately east of the project area boundary (see Figure 10). The site is situated on a western facing slope, among koa haole and trees with Guinea grass ground cover. The lava tube is 60.0 in (E/W) by 9.0 In (N/S) with a maximum height of 0.95 in (Figure 11). The site is in good condition. No artifacts were found along the surface and no excavation was conducted. The skeletal remains of a single individual were identified in makai (west) end of the lava tube. The lava tube can be accessed through two openings, one at the makai end of the lava tube and a second, larger opening approximately 20.0 meters mauka (east) of the makai opening (see Figure 11). The lava tube continues east 15.0 meters and east- southeast 25.0 to 30.0 meters from the mauka opening. A second tube, connecting to the east-southeast tube, continues west-southwest 30.0 meters. The makai entrance is an approximately 0.9 in long (E/W) by 0.7 in wide hole in the exposed pdhoehoe ground surface. The floor of the lava tube is 0.5 to 0.9 cm below the opening and is primarily bare lava with deposits of natural pebbles, small cobbles, and fine sediment washed into the tube from the opening and a second point in the tube approximately 6.0 in east of the opening. The tube slopes gently upward in an easterly direction. Sediment from a collapsed point 6.0 meters into the tube covers the lava tube floor in thicker deposits nearer to the point of collapse. The distal end of a human femur, talus, metatarsal, and phalange were identified on the surface of the lava tube floor below the makai opening. The skeletal elements were small in size and were deteriorated, making positive identification difficult. The ilium of a small human pelvis was identified protruding from the sediment along the south wall of the lava tube, approximately 5.0 in mauka of the makai opening. Sediment was removed in small increments to expose the one half of a pelvis. Half of the ilium had deteriorated and was no longer present on the pelvis. More sediment (4.0 to 8.0 cm in thickness) was removed to expose additional human skeletal elements located within close proximity to the pelvis. These included lumbar, thoracic, and cervical vertebrae; ribs; both clavicles and shoulder blades; the left ulna and radius; several phalanges; and two incisors and a molar. 21 E 4— LA r a� � w G Y m L La C � f C tiC+ 4J ;1 C N N The other half of the pelvis; cranium, mandible, other long bones, and remaining skeletal elements were not located in the limited removal of sediment. If these skeletal elements are buried beneath the sediment on the floor of the lava tube, they may no longer be articulated with the identified skeletal elements. It is possible that they have moved down slope of the in situ burial. This is likely, as a calcaneus, tarsals, and metatarsals were identified during a second, more thorough inspection of the lava tube floor under the makai openinga distance of 5.0 in down slope of the burial location. At least a portion of the femur and several foot bones have moved down slope of the original burial location. Based on the limited removal of sediment from the skeletal elements, the burial is of a single individual in a supine position, arms at sides, with head located mauka (east) and feet makai. The size of the skeletal elements indicates a young adult of small stature or a subadult. The skeletal elements were fairly deteriorated so that sex and age could not be definitively ascertained. BURIAL SITE COMPONENT OF A PRESERVATION PLAN SEARCH FOR LINEAL AND CULTURAL DESCENDANTS Rules governing the search for lineal and cultural descendants in the burial treatment process (HAR §13-300-33(b)(1) call for three things: (A) Research of relevant land conveyance documents including identification of land commission awardees located at or near the burial site; (B) An inquiry to any person who may have knowledge of families possibly affiliated with the Native Hawaiian remains; (C) Publication of notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county in which the burial site is located and a newspaper of statewide circulation for a minimum of three days, including Sunday and Wednesday. Research of Relevant Land Conveyance and Historical Documents The Land Commission awarded the majority of Holualoa 1st and 2" d Ahupua`a to Victoria Kamamalu Ka`ahumanu IV, Kuhina Nui of Hawaii Island and Crown Princess of Hawaii as Land Commission Award (LCA) Number 7713, `Apana 43. The lava tube burial is within this LCA. 23 Publication of Notice in Newspaper Notice that the burial treatment process is being conducted Site 30593 was published in the West Hawaii Today (Hawai`i Island), the Honolulu Star Advertiser (O`ahu Island), and in the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) Ka Wai Ola newspaper. The public notice and affidavits of the publication can be found in Appendix B at the back of this report. The public notices and outreach generated responses from recognized cultural descendants J. Curtis Tyler III and Nicole Lui. Curtis reviewed the first draft BSCPP which included preservation in-place and a rock wall on the ground surface over the iwi kupuna. Nicole made a site visit to see the burial location. Nicole requested that three lau kala mats be placed in the tube over the iwi kupuna, a nearby large rock be used as a capstone to seal the makai opening of the tube, and that the tube remain undisturbed. The mauka tube opening will be sealed by infilling it with large rocks to look natural. The large rock Nicole located near the site can be used as a capstone. Nicole also requested to conduct a blessing at the site prior to implementation of the preservation treatments. PRESERVATION TREATMENTS This Burial Site Component of a Preservation Plan recommends preservation in-place for burial Site 30593. The burial will be protected by the preservation treatments listed below. Interim Preservation Buffers During any construction using heavy equipment within 50 feet of the burial site before the permanent rock wall is built, orange construction fence will be placed along the no -build easement, at a minimum of 30.0 feet from the burial preservation site (Figure 12). The fence will be inspected by a qualified archaeologist prior to the commencement of construction. No heavy equipment will be allowed within the construction buffer. A qualified archaeological monitor will be present during any ground disturbing construction within 50 feet of the burial site. Long -Term Preservation Measures A permanent preservation buffer will be established on the ground surface at a distance of 20.0 feet from the outside perimeter of the burial portion of the lava tube (Figure 12 and Figure 13). A no -build easement will be established ten feet from the outside perimeter of the permanent preservation buffer. The long-term buffer will consist of a low rock wall with a gate for pedestrian access. The buffer will be installed under the direction of a qualified archaeologist and will be inspected by a qualified archaeologist. 24 � � � _ � a 7 � 2 2 � 7 % 3 J % @ . � � � 0 % _ T q � 7 � � 7 % 3 J % @ . T q f� �§ I§ 7:1 40, � * . � � 40, 40, � 7 � � % % . � � � ■ � � ■ � f� �§ I§ 7:1 40, � * . � � 40, 40, � KEY - PROJECT AREA - BURIAL SITE' - 2 4 FT BUFFER q - ACCESS I - ROCK WALL T7V i 0 10 40 611 BD M ETU S 14 Figure 13: 7.5 -Minute Series USGS Topographic Map Showing Locations of Site 30593 Access (ESRI, 2011. Sources: National Geographic Society, USGS. Kealakekua Quadrangle). 26 Three locally made lau kala mats will be placed in the tube over the iwi kupuna, a nearby large rock will be used as a capstone to seal the makai opening of the tube, and the mauka tube opening will be sealed with large rocks and made to look natural. The lava tube containing the burial will remain undisturbed from the mauka to the makai entrances. Access Pedestrian access to Site 30593 shall be from Io Place located east of the site (see Figure 13 and Figure 14). Parking is available on Io Place. In the event of future construction, an easement shall be from a paved road closer than the current end of Io Place to the site. The property owner is responsible for ensuring the access easement is usable for pedestrian travel, and is responsible for keeping the access easement clear and open. Access will be permitted seven days a week, one-half hour before sunrise to one-half hour after sunset. Access can be arranged by calling the property owner. In the event the property is sold, the new owner will be notified with a written list of recognized descendants and their contact information. Signage Weather -resistant signs, approximately 18 by 24 inches in size, shall be placed at the access gate and along the preservation fencing at a maximum distance of 50 feet. The signs shall read: WAHI KAPU This site is historically and culturally significant to the Hawaiian people. KAPU — DO NOT ENTER Historic sites are protected under state law. Violation could result in a $20,000 fine. (Chapter 6E-11, Hawaii Revised Statutes) DLNR-SHPD (808) 692-8015 Installation of Preservation Measures The preservation measures listed in this BSCPP will be installed prior to the issuance of County of Hawaii grubbing and/or grading permits for work on the property. A letter documenting the installation of preservation measures will be sent to SHPD/HIBC confirming completion of preservation measure installation. 27 W z O N Landscaping Existing plants or appropriate native plants may be grown within the burial preservation area. Recognized descendants shall be consulted concerning the types of plants used and descendants are welcome to participate in planting and caring for vegetation within the preservation area. Maintenance The landowner is responsible for maintenance of the rock wall, access path, signage, vegetation clearing, and general appearance of the preservation area. Hand tools may be used within the preservation area to maintain and prune vegetation. Annual inspections of the preservation measures shall be conducted by the property owner to ensure compliance with the preservation measures outlined in this BSCPP. Recognized descendants are welcome to inspect the preservation measures as well. Any harm observed to the burial preservation area and preservation measures arising from intentional or unintentional acts, including neglect, will be immediately reported to SHPD. The Division of Conservation and Resources Enforcement (DOCARE) will be notified, will consult with the land owner and recognized descendants, and shall implement remedies based on that consultation. Bureau of Conveyances Subsequent to final approval by SHPD of this Burial Site Component of a Preservation Plan, a metes and bounds description of the burial and burial preservation site and permanent preservation easement shall be surveyed and recorded with the State of Hawaii Bureau of Conveyances in conformance with HAR §13-300-38(g). The TMK plat map will include a map of the preservation area. Property Title The details of this preservation plan and its preservation measures shall become a matter of record with the parcel title. The descriptions of the preservation easements will be added to the title, including the specific requirements and restrictions related to physical improvements, signage, maintenance and access. 29 Aki, H. REFERENCES CITED 1952 Map of Kailua Section, North Kona, Hawaii, Land Titles. Survey and Map by J.S. Emerson. Hawaii Territory Survey Map. Registered Map No. 1280. Alexander, J. 1855 Map of Hblualoa 1 & 2, Kona Hawaii. Hawaii Territory Survey Map. Registered Map No. 1450. Athens, J., T. Reith, and T. Dye 2014 A paleo environmental and archaeological model -based age estimate for the colonization of Hawaii. American Antiquity, 79(4):144-55. Barrera, W. Jr. 1971 Archaeological Excavations and Survey at Keauhou, North Kona, Hawaii. Bishop Museum Departmental Report Series 71-10. Submitted to Kamehameha Development Corporation. B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu. Burtchard, G. C. 1995 Population and Land -use on the Keauhou Coast, the Mauka Lands Inventory Survey, Keauhou, North Kona, Hawai `i Island, the Narrative, part 1. Submitted to Belt, Collins and Associates and Kamehameha Investment Corporation. IARII, Honolulu. Cordy, R. 1981 A Study of Prehistoric Social Change: The Development of Complex Societies in the Hawaiian Islands. Academic Press, New York. 1995 Central Kona Archaeological Settlement Patterns. Department of Land and Natural Resources, State Historic Preservation Division, Honolulu. 2000 Exalted Sits the Chief. Mutual Publishing, Honolulu. Dye, T. 2011 A model -based age estimate for Polynesian colonization of Hawaii Archaeology in Oceania, 46:130-38. Ellis. W. 1963 Narrative of a Tour of Hawaii, or Owhyhee. Advertiser Publishing, Honolulu. 30 Escott. G., and S. Escott 2018 Archaeological Inventory Survey Report for 5.0 Acres Located in H61ualoa 1st Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Hawaii Island, Hawaii [TMK: (3)7-6-021:017 Por.]. Prepared for East West Realty. SCS Report 1871-1, Honolulu. Google Earth 2013 Google Earth Imagery. Google Earth. Mountain View, Ca. Hammatt, H. H., and S. D. Clark 1980 Archaeological Testing and Salvage Excavations of a 155 Acre (Ginter) Parcel in Na ahupua `a Pahoehoe, La `aloa, and Kapala `alaea, Kona, Hawai `i Island. ARCH Report 14-152 III. Submitted to Pacific Basin Resorts, Inc. Hammatt, H.H., and W.H. Folk 1980 Archaeological Survey, Phase L• Portions of Keauhou-Kona Resort, Keauhou and Kahulu `u, Kona, Hawai `i Island. ARCH Report 14-177 ILI. Submitted to Kamehameha Investment Corporation. Hammatt, H.H., W.H. Folk, and D.W. Shideler 1992 Archaeological Survey Testing and Excavation of a 174 -Acre Parcel, Holualoa, North Kona, Hawai `i. Report prepared by Cultural Surveys Hawaii for the Gamlon Corporation. Report on file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Handy, E.S. 1940 The Hawaiian Planter, Volume I B.P. Bishop Museum bulletin 161. B.P. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Haim, T. L., S. L. Collins, S. D. Clark, and A. Garland 1986 Moe Kau a Ho `oilo: Hawaiian Mortuary Practices at Keopu, Kona, Hawai `i. Chapter VII. Artifacts and Manuports from the Ke6pu Burial Site. Bishop Museum Departmental Report Series 86-1. Submitted to Department of Transportation, Honolulu. Haun, A. E., J. D. Henry, J. A. Jimenez, M. A. Kirkendall, K. Maly, and T. R. Wolforth 1998 Ali `i Highway Phased Mitigation Program Phase I- Archaeological Intensive Survey, Summary, vol. 1. PHRI Report 1320-052798. Submitted to County of Hawaii. PHRI, Hilo. Hommon, R. J. 1986 Social Evolution in Ancient Hawaii. In Island Societies: Archaeological Approaches to Evolution and Transformation, edited by P.V. Kirch, pp. 55-88. University Press, Cambridge. 31 Kahn, J., Rieth, P. Kirch, J. Athens, and G. Murakami 2014 Re -dating of the Kuli`ou`ou rockshelter, Oahu, Hawaii: Location of the first radiocarbon date from the Pacific Islands. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 123(1):67-90. Kelly, M. 1983 Nd Mala o Kona: Gardens of Kona. Dept. of Anthropology Report Series 83-2. Bishop Museum. Honolulu. Kirch, P.V. 2011 When did the Polynesians settle Hawaii? Are -view of 150 years of scholarly inquiry and a tentative answer. Hawaiian Archaeology, 12:3-26. Kirch, P.V. and M. McCoy 2007 Reconfiguring the Hawaiian Cultural Sequence: Results of re -dating the Halawa dune site (MO -Al -3), Molokai Island. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 116:385-406. 2007 Revised late Holocene culture history for Molokai Island, Hawaii. Radiocarbon, 49(3):1273-1322. Maly, K 1993 Ka `ao Ho `oniva Pu `uwai No Ka-Miki, The Heart Story Story of Ka-Miki. Published in Hawaiian, in the newspaper "Ka Hoku o Hawai I (Hilo) January 8, 1914 through December 6, 1917. Translated by Kepa Maly for Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. 1996 Historical Documentary Research. In Archaeological Inventory Survey Proposed Henry Street Extension Road Corridor, by Wulzen, W., T.R. Wolforth, and L.J. Franklin, pp. 9-19. PRHI Report 1465-092696. Prepared for Maryl Development, Kailua-Kona. PHRI, Hilo. Maly, K. and O. Maly 2002 He Wahi Mo `olelo No Ka `Rina A Me Nd `Ohana O Waiki `i Ma Waikoloa (Kalana O Waimea, Kohala), A Me Ka `Rina Mauna: A Collection of Traditions and Historical Accounts of the Lands and Families of Waiki `i at Waikoloa (Waimea Region, South Kohala), and the Mountain Lands, Island of Hawai `i (TMK Overview Sheet 6-7-01). Kumu Pono Associates. Hilo. McCoy, M. 2005 The development of the Kalaupapa field system, Koloka`i Island, Hawaii. Journal of the Polynesian Society, 116:339-58. Menzies, A. 1920 Hawai `i Nei 128 Years Ago. Edited by W.F. Wilson. New Freedom Press. Honolulu. 32 Mulrooney, M, S. Bickler, M. Allen, and T. Ladefoged 2011 High -precision dating of colonization and settlement in East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108:EI92-E194. National Geographic, Topo! 2003 Seamless USGS Topographic Maps on CD-ROM, Hawai `i. National Geographic Holdings, Inc. Washington, D.C. Newman, T. S. 1970 Hawaiian Fishing and Farming on the Island of Hawaii A.D. 1778. Department of Land and Natural Resources, Honolulu. Rieth, Timothy M., Terry L. Hunt, Carl Lipo, and Janet M. Wilmshurst 2011 The 13th Century Polynesian Colonization of Hawaii Island. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:2740-2749. Pukui, M.K., S. Elbert and E. Mookini 1974 Place Names of Hawaii. University of Hawaii Press. Honolulu Sato, H., W. &eda, R Paeth, R Smythe, and M. Takehiro Jr. 1973 Soil Survey of Island of Hawaii, State of Hawaii. United States Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service. Washington D.C. Schilt, R. 1984 Subsistence and Conflict in Kona, Hawai `i: An Archaeological Study of the Kuakini Highway Realignment Corridor. Department of Anthropology, B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu_ Report prepared for the Hawaii Department of Transportation. On file at the SHPD Library, Kapolei. Tomonari-Tuggle, M. J. 1990 Archaeological Inventory Survey of Development Parcel 26 of the Keauhou Resort, Ahupua `a of Kahalu `u, North Kona, Island of Hawai `i. Prepared for Belt Collins and Associates. International Archaeological Research Institute, Inc. Honolulu. U.S. Geological Survey 1928 I5 -Minute Series Topographic Hilo Quadrangle Map. USGS Print, Washington, DC. URL: http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/topomaps/. Vancouver, G. 1967 A Voyage of Discovery to the North Pacific Ocean, and Around the World. Robinson and Edwards. London. Waihona `Rina 2014 Mahele online database. www.waihona.com. 33 Wilkes, C. 1970 Narrative of the United States Exploring Expedition During the Years 1938-1842. Vols. 1-5 and Atlas. Lea & Blanchard. Philadelphia. Wihnhurst, J., T. Hunt, C. Lipo, and A. Anderson 2011a High -precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid colonization of East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108:1815-20. 2011b Reply to Mulrooney et al.: Accepting lower precision radiocarbon dates results in longer colonization chronologies for East Polynesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108:E195. Wolfe, E.W., and J. Morris 1996 Geological Map of the Island of Hawaii. U.S.G.S. Miscellaneous Investigations Series. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 34 APPENDIX A: SHPD AIS APPROVAL LETTER 35 Rick Wheelock 181 Kalaniana`ole Street Hilo. Hawai'i 96720 Email: richardeastwestrealty.org Dear Mr. Wheelock: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review — Archeological inventory Survey of 5.0 Acres in H6lualoa Holualoa 1st Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii TMK: (3) 7-6-021:017 por. IN REPLY REFER TO: Log No. 2018.01 123 Doc. No. 1805SN05 Archaeology This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SHPD's) review of the revised report titled Archaeological Inventory Survev Report for 5.0 Acres Located in Holualoa I" Ahupua `a, North Kona, Hawaii Island, Hawai `i [TMK: (3) 7-6-021:017 por] (Escott and Escott, revised May 2018). Revisions to the report were requested via email on May 13, 2018 (Susan Lebo [SHPD] to Glenn Escott [Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS)]) and SHPD received the revised report on May 18, 2017. SCS conducted the archaeological inventory survey (AIS) at the request of the landowner, Kona Three, LLC. The AIS was conducted in support of a County of Hawaii permit application for proposed development of the property. The ATS covered a 5.0 -acre portion of the 30.901 -acre parcel. The fieldwork included a 100% pedestrian survey of the entire project area. Ground visibility was fair to poor. Subsurface testing was conducted at several features. The AIS documented twenty-two newly identified historic properties (Table 1). The sites include a pre- and/or early post -Contact lava tube burial, pro- and/or early post -Contact agricultural terraces, and post -Contact aralls and enclosures associated with agriculture and/or ranching, and a post -Contact railroad berm. Table 1. Summary of Sites Documented in AIS Site #50-10-37- SUZANNE D. CASE D AMID Y. ICE COA IR 04 [6 6.... yy� VAII �'m 4^y���� � 55 on ON «A xi �O�xC.m rvn., .ni .ni drU r t-5 ROBERT K MASUDA `-- e¢uT Dnrcry ,14:4'4R4.Y I PNAR-AWY.4:. i TER 30592 � r r Historic 30593 Lava Tube Burial STATE OF HAWAII k,rrrw+ DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES Agriculture STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DR'ISION xnre r.,ax.� 30595 lU1KUH LHE W A BU ILDIN G Ranching 601 KAMOIULA BLVD, STE 555 30596 K.APOLEI, HAWAII 96707 May 31, 2018 Historic Rick Wheelock 181 Kalaniana`ole Street Hilo. Hawai'i 96720 Email: richardeastwestrealty.org Dear Mr. Wheelock: SUBJECT: Chapter 6E-42 Historic Preservation Review — Archeological inventory Survey of 5.0 Acres in H6lualoa Holualoa 1st Ahupua`a, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii TMK: (3) 7-6-021:017 por. IN REPLY REFER TO: Log No. 2018.01 123 Doc. No. 1805SN05 Archaeology This letter provides the State Historic Preservation Division's (SHPD's) review of the revised report titled Archaeological Inventory Survev Report for 5.0 Acres Located in Holualoa I" Ahupua `a, North Kona, Hawaii Island, Hawai `i [TMK: (3) 7-6-021:017 por] (Escott and Escott, revised May 2018). Revisions to the report were requested via email on May 13, 2018 (Susan Lebo [SHPD] to Glenn Escott [Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. (SCS)]) and SHPD received the revised report on May 18, 2017. SCS conducted the archaeological inventory survey (AIS) at the request of the landowner, Kona Three, LLC. The AIS was conducted in support of a County of Hawaii permit application for proposed development of the property. The ATS covered a 5.0 -acre portion of the 30.901 -acre parcel. The fieldwork included a 100% pedestrian survey of the entire project area. Ground visibility was fair to poor. Subsurface testing was conducted at several features. The AIS documented twenty-two newly identified historic properties (Table 1). The sites include a pre- and/or early post -Contact lava tube burial, pro- and/or early post -Contact agricultural terraces, and post -Contact aralls and enclosures associated with agriculture and/or ranching, and a post -Contact railroad berm. Table 1. Summary of Sites Documented in AIS Site #50-10-37- Tv a Function Age 30591 Agricultural Complex Agriculture Pre- to Post -Contact 30592 Railroad and Berm Transportation Historic 30593 Lava Tube Burial Pre- to Early Post -Contact 30594 Agricultural Complex Agriculture Pre- to Post -Contact 30595 Rock Wall Ranching Historic 30596 Possible Hearth Food Preparation Historic 30597 Rock Wall Ranching Historic 30598 Rock Wall Agriculture/Ranching Pre- to Post -Contact 30599 Platform & Enclosure Ranching/Agriculture Historic 30600 Terrace Agriculture Historic 30601 Rock Wall Ranching Historic 30602 Enclosure Ranching/Agriculture Historic 30603 Enclosure Ranching/Agriculture Historic 36 Mir. whrcuock Map 31.2018 Pa9l; 2 "itu 050,19 37 ------ _-- Type -1v'(4 Gump" AL'-iru4ire _-:1 POSI-C�:IT LtCIL 2- kcck ':'''da Ru;lc1lii_�.ALiluku:L: ?: L PoA Ulzlis,t Fzo:vhiAllnullkij- r A L�.77 L:U[[Ld-2a Clawtem Au-:L-j!uj i r -o P.3% ­"Lau Mrd tiL = 1 7-'; r 31a(j(9 L:S,' Q5UN MAC C! I - ­ - -------- - Po�l 3uol 1 A ;_L:L:lj i LU; it 1 L13WCX A-I:IL:'J;L.11,: ':L' :0 VoA k %13-11 L "f;61 TIR 2--. :;!wvV%' aq Significant TindeT HAP :P r 1.:--1::e,. lcr. I lll.md 1 1,n1 wa. n:5%) 0.s 5r,,,pil'i&sr-. 111':'1_-r C',it-r-a a cmrt c inf. %va. i S.. _:­f...:,T-k.jjjljn S 0 ;,!4 :JIV;._ 1:1:, jj;j-jaj) was a-se:.ct", m'.jni[_1,Mn' ur:dL7 .-n:J Ml� r_'U-M-P,,n_.,,: ',,rpro%,L!-,,zLLivn ['Tc;vr :c.ion rm!mjr_-; L1LdiT.LA1 in D',F__A] ITI,­r_rl lh', x27,1011 TCCOrimenLil., ra, lu�F.,r am-iacol,F:cal I'LIT -_:a S c 30,01 :sml I S:Ee, k�no-� Lb.,kijgh 1`0612 S�_` _-im; :,::Ornra:vr: hu; Fu.m L:rllmud 1'1T :r.','.W FIL1,1S l:: CJC1.1qu%:14.15 T().,Icl,! ni.. 'LC -'r-A rl:lwinr Ji: -1 lln ih. ,e,1;' ~111111 , drli — iri;riEm ie "OTcL, Arl, :111-, md .1r%1 til'r 17 11 with thosigaifkanvr and Lrratl11Znt rcoommendaticns. 'n , — --J; 1111 .p—irf,,l ir, 1FAR rh, -1p.-I ;, ­,pr,a. rur.l­ -i ',ILI 11;'-A L;L'.-I.1 LLLXB.',-e �-INAL N Aa o :L- L:,. j-' 111X, -:LJ L, UW _CiULIM',AV ?11-1- I dit� R.i._-u:,L Slil"D Aiki., SHIT , -1 lY 7ULIJL,.JIJaNdll,.ELI3 I. A , ;u.-u1)tL,: r. 11:\it §1 T, !Lm JPD cox.rncm.4 Lba. a --.rol.x[ 'silk 1-c dz no L-Tczl •".10% ;:PTCCd-LPOT3 �nni-rimw.rLS J-.cn ,_•_L;Jled 111:L�i hL Lv� <HPT) ir.,: ev Line, aLc,,p1LrL_' PrLGr lly;rffd -Inn 1711'e;l: I. Allir;:mc, Nvv7,.xi:,-: )m; ar!mco,oqi,-.O mori,:,�rivv P-iou.1111 'i; 11AR 2k K, 'SHIA) RiA, 'vr,,ard lo r,cv1,-ici1; :i :Zud:]:::Iffl 3-j". -,): Sa: an Of it:1.1 L, All, i.-' :-4 fui 4:x ank: :n. arL:;xwuLL)Ekal -1v il-vir,;- {j ..'1I; t ):ir.i% PCM 1 ii'4'._.LnA! 411FIT1 !Eh,,ill nritify the (','.rmi '0`1�`l . I -- 1'1T h i gi11 1;1C Nvd -i uniLLi- - A- -i. and ui: L-auim _rd ic 'i�j i: 11t1111L!EiL tmeimimeg bane beca d ld LLI- ;,,-r::.iL h— berm, rcvleucu, :1:14: :.1:1 c1:1 J.La Cjk:LUr- u (808)933-7551 or4,1JW T ', d. -i ia.saugm ifyou bAwcaEly qucqOos oF A. Ldbv, till U, 6': :11 T .._ .. . Si �, "cu:qgrA 37 APPENDIX B: PUBLIC NOTICES IN TER r K[,t I' r'l- IZ r ill; k4sbI kial'I'm l Y1 - 9TATF OF IIAWAI I f I Ss' CRY :� ,L (;k.0 VA*1 uf Hnnaluto JAN Dec. Date: 5949 I'llcilke: M(LaW Lth AML!. 3 3 F K rill A orj! I h1aW, KwAl Notary Nam,6: IWIG -'_U 00C. Mrcrition: p cult 'Y ... ... r. . �0. 111, _)T-AFW HIJUL] l4hre h II Jaen M -04rfffli I diift or. AIWWaO jfkSvE, ,I 0 1"'1 -Yc Ili 01? uur,El is � bi Vbmi;"I-p. Foe DI-ift P'l."I ' ltali. Tr*.arc K, -p JPJ 'll '90 'J 11—: �1: 0 1 1 10. liH-frpcf Aid �17 &�hd II 6JAUM COM EL Z &A"i N 11417 E,,c su,. -reA �-zorK i,liw, 11 IF 01 h rr I:- Ile IA2j 'Lontl igira E-jr.El CRT.., Irl �diFwli'mW are .k,*. I I INNI'j, QMLL bv­', - '11' in, depopm a" Ll::Ll a Ii rl* Di h.ii i - %NM. iW.F, cmcutc 1hL5 affl.3v; L- 1 11 hl9r: II irl: 1Y. 7l 31wr n-. I r I 7fir i) -r li: Jia uiii I IIIS.- .1 tA H. ;I V7 0 3r wo �) 55 LC:, III. ;'CIE@ TrAyu7e4krald —.1 new wa�j, 7 '�z I . ..... . irl" v., U' ik Jt &Lddcd Liu: ry W.11 II m elx dBPD1d Vtflif- ',in Av vi vi; (IL.- -� j ''." APPiPplifIt Nwxieft OF 4.± 'vw, - I Jr: l rpm fa Ot '+ .Aocnqu­ .Illi"*4hr W:" winK%in 101k I 1,L")LLIELL 1L3 -.--A dll�,rtfsdl' 0 limg on: '*ikinfuin"d IwL "W1 Mid"Vock 0 LIM 9 CM_' The Mirykn Tshrtd 0 L Uws OrL Uawau rnbuim-fleradd 0 limes on. 3 limpi on: - - I I 011hff PIJ III �ZLLI- I I I NOTA Y AM &.1 KIT -1 u ir-P, l, party' to Lv ia rainy ",;ry jqWIigSMpd in dM aFlayc onlijkli Mg=r CAYM rF1'l b4ftH 11C Chi, ,4 d- OF fyr ,t M14P Gia K itie' Mai -81% r !L!E Ii I I I' ;ns—em !xprcs . f --t 67, 2 2 A kd , d 0 (Y.101161 0 West Hawaii Today Public Notice Affidavit. A-1 AFFI bhvrr OF PUBLICATION 1N TIM hfATM p OF } 9.6.1 hbrlar. EblLraloq >< ru1F+u } } f D t ST.LTE OF R sl1m P UcymadCnat�Wilonnkulr j Honolulu Star -Advertiser Public Notice Affidavit. A-2 DOC, Date: JAN P.ur]r° ku1kK Hauaioit irk AS.i �. Y. Note .�. YnnA ak�lllell H9y�[dL1�11'J. X8Y7fl ' Notary Nam 8, I F ricia K F:— 1 l ircirFt cl r, a oedr i'et; bat h ne WMW xsa Q4C. Dvl;crl tlQl'k F.rfr1"xwil r aCarC''r�' Ft i� 111 t f p�sk$haeolplJ,a;l«} fawr oi' - al ItrI ITOP IaI 7 6 ru eta {P8 -0I a14 -t, W.J1 - 1 rii]T1�J jf .' 1" = Ik Idgtls !-d dfS07.lf�S, 3R'J A - ry f�ryI �• PUf]�. IL: A J• '3 l.7idrf Pi IC�`kY1 tfi1 n311 l LQI7 it .r -n .• J) A -i H wi ram irdluc�,F- s3 SI Ih9 pr4:k 7p, -r:1 r W No: 36.407 �t �,. 1 } [ IhE tiJ�IS.. I- 1_: +i ; I� :1� ��ytltl,?uf41 r f,'� L•�R4 -'� Ipp �s ; Itx hI Co i r ., IPn4rl .uk brc■ni, rJ 1 1 1 - •.I 'n1 ... ...I 'J. �t.,, :ic irdYlYhcgi7odin t . + '.1 : .1, 1-1 1 L.:."a- I�,.�ik7bday,srwflHLL,MtII aklrr'`i ,:J�ITCyGila[Rlrr S=.n {� rvc k1 ._1r .._:u. .,. .. .11 . :nefnkcrreul k "1' " 9LM m ftx SdakC X114$-. .384Yn5 P'a 9-0s 1I Eo:, I'. 71.• tnpid 'VN, rC. -r.:. )l •�: L;":: ' •r 1-< Of lix.tn_., . l.: L1, .. . 1„ . .._ „L.. 1 1.... ' l : ;Is I'm Pohl mbed ICI &A 4iift :I.A Lut-ul of Lia 1LahYAB. 1,16 6A. Je>pald4ltmYx he, ■r6+:la eAeau■Ye4 dNm A■{1■•• lion chilu slat -Ad, _, 1 ..1 u: nY' III,r7l�Nr,4 F9bIm"q 0 fN 41.iHi nn Ihr aaaa:.. oe■d la d.' 12030, (7 i 1'Qgl ps ktf aatt"s2J34Jie; ifz{al4e1:. ' h1Ldi1 ti MCS on - n-hoiMrden191wd ho (Mirden 1_91wd0 dlmesbrf' HaWRA Triivt -lk reld 4 IkAr . oil. SVestlittwj�i7°At1fl3' tlttlCion _0 • ` �rr�Fv RLhurPuhlicoliony: 4 ri 4 lknke9uli: tf�{ =� NOTARY t _ Au,� LhaEa�iavlt is not aF�f4 OS IA drrc .... 1+._1:: 14 s;, , PLIPIIP t _ yr.^��1 5l.,I.i ::m__, ul :n• �.Cl ]4�4 '+r.1.1.,' P4rlt iI M��S bC/.�t hA ,lai .":•f •'.l i, :.:J I'.: Ai, Ol l d&i&WI S{4/'iII;,L I{NY r.Cy.ISi. :'7 62 I C001if .-" 5PAU: LN Honolulu Star -Advertiser Public Notice Affidavit. A-2 BURIAL NOLI'ICE: HQLtAMA IST AHUPUA'A. NORTH KONA DISTRICT, HAWAII ISLAND,11AV4AI'T Notice is hereby given that human r�.mains were identilicil during an Arrlraeolorical latvcaa- tory Survey of 5,0-aujo,, of land [TMKC (3)7-"21`.O ; ipera j in 116hialoa IstAhupaa'a. Nnnh KL)na District, Hawaii Island. Hawaii, The lands are associated with LCA 7713. 'Apautaa 43 awarded to Vic- Lofia 1 amk lu Kaa'ahumanu IV. Proper treatment shall occur in accordance with Hawaii 1leviNcd Statutes, Chapter 6E rt�arding unmarked -,rave sites. "T-hti prop- el' .Y UV5Ll4'L L'I iJi Ii"Ll LD Iii C':CL'r i" the Nina Is in place 1°nr perpetuity, in accoulLowe, with d plant prepared in nsarttation with identifieddowen- dauts and with the approval of the Hawaii Island Burial CoruaciI and SIIPD, [ntcreslcd persims am lrerehw requesled to contact JonJan Kea Calpito, Burial Sites Special- ist, State Historic Preservation Division (SHFD)? (80S) 933-7650. 40 Po'ukelak Street, Hilo, Hawaii 46720 or Glenn Escott. Scientific Consultant Services, [me.. (809) 938-0968, FOCI Box 155 Ka;a'asu, Hl. Plcaaw respond within 30 da}x of this notice to discuss appropriate treatment of the remains. Inditi•idu- als responding. must be able to adequately d>~atonstmie lineal <aaadi or cults" conwtion to the burials on the above- referenced land. Ka Wai Ola Public Notice Affidavit. A-3 Sciv,,-rrFw CONSLAAAN-1 S ): 14 Ni I C Ii -S JrJe. koulwarcil, Suiw 3$0 HmglWu. H1 96914 - - I 1', - 1110 B -a% 155 H3 96749 1 HO. -2019 Q 14111; WON Site -311601, apid -31 TH2 (Featmv' -7 mlil 3) W:dl Pi 1w, FLIIWflori and I AA -111%A1 IM '(1. 122 Iket o,4il I mid in HOILMI-1.) 1 Ahu)111mLI, h+11,:1 Di'll' jig, JI:M::i'i III-lild I 'or I on, , o -f I N I I-,: (,;.I 7-6-021:@01r, jillki 1117 (i,fbr il Aloha r Richmd- Al IS(.til �-,Vd. :1,A' I wl voiZ )IV:)C!'% 1011`-IICL-11 11 IT :iI.1-llLVI 11C;'11111...I'l iFIE MV I rll,-A&: I I -LII -C '�. 111e ;II LO-I!J;:dCli 1"111111C col I. -I. -,,poll%-, Ic, Oc !)-:I!) 1 :"71101.1 1 1 !v. I.,.: C 111 -1 r I ;1,i I-, L�or!!!m!ls :1-, .111: 1 ;Jld 11:A14 ;:r 11: 112 :i k- LJ 1 1: 1 C 1+. 11!1 2 ,EIC:_ i�m I 1 .11 : I E :71-o i C'. I I F": :P,1 '11:1. 111: -1: IS all %..x.1. 111 "IiIII %A 114I�l iT : lfGA rI1V WW 111311 CL�i! R I Cl' ; I I 1,110 :1'L i 1; ICI 'II U.:1 ' I..1 1U, Projert Arrhamlogival Shidies Tlwl �, .I cr�, th Q,' 1, :1, 1:" ..I. I�x-': Alin 111C DFA pl. ::Ck I n.n;11 ray ikw;_'ll J:. I :11d'. -.11" Ltd JIL" Nwic 71.71 1 sab icettoan APA I- -�N IT. I'm " 1: 1: 7 -1 :,I I I %: ! �: 1'.' .11- .A .. � I !. I --- :III 1C.:: ;�11';I I.I11 Illi T 1C. -I I1r 1 F i r 1 0 I '1 IM I L'. %. I� I 'I k:1 1 1'1-- : . N I 4 "I '.I I Ill. ix) ,) ;I, r: -ti rl kwd 11;1.11 I A I I k 1 11 .7 1 k )1 11 ; ; "l;1 I c'4, 1 ' 'r1 1 0 maters) m,::'t YI%4K- (,.. -" I I ::I' .:Ill :;I- I AL -ICA 'Al:hil 11,- :;:'Il DEA pr*ct area xk,-Il II -I I A 11 J. 11, -1 , ". " - , k V11: L�� �v 1, -.1c'I pude l�iarr sw-vcy wO i%%z :% - -.- mt 1%.- J,` I,.. -111L. 11L:L: ­-,:m!IJL % 11 Ill- mkujc w. Yeolua idetilif]Cd LLI ILOL SIIJLI4-. I'IJQ AIS -L�1.)01( JVC-0MEL1CJILl1:d ELO ELLI'thu sk L-11 k d 1 2 1 ,11c, Planning Dept. Exhibit 3 Firgqirc I x-500 K-Neries Map of Haww'i island Sho%mng LOCRUOn Of PrCj eCt ArCfl (Viii al t1cogiaphic Tapol- 2003. Data Soureds- National CjeoWaoic Society ITSGS)- I .'+.r fir!•,.., 4 Y 11"+'� y p A IH•• i � vv�7 '1' i • 1 _ Icy. - y� V- �` �'� ' .• L... ® v'1 flrum 2: 7.5-kL' nutt Senrs LIEGE Topographic Nhip ,] 17nject Axes (KciblAckma Qin GSRL MY la.,eu 7 Figkry J,' Arial YUolugrrkals Slw%4irig PmM ,area, ilulualu-. 116.I xw 3 North. M,"3 m E. 217174n err N. fi'SM.2ffU Ino-v. WIA SOLI &: LhgkJ Ulo r, CivwF'.} , Earfltstur. UISDr, wvd ljN(mi� , j7. El vcn 4-j —fr oIR' N'g- Hp_kim 4: 7,5-%Irrid: S-rc-., I ti: -K i ..I l...,. -;r.-11 r `,i 1! - 4;,,,.,.. :I I -i '-' "!:.-r - i " c I I - � I .'I I I J, .; �7 In, L., 1.414 1 Roparl. :ind Pr ) ic , i '.r.,l , K—IAA i a t)u,iul. I .l R L. -'!. ii. I ),U, .!-) A : ,.Li I.I: i j I 1,- `4 Aill I I M% SGSy. a. V'03k, PIIHIII NI Ik j7. El vcn 4-j —fr oIR' N'g- Hp_kim 4: 7,5-%Irrid: S-rc-., I ti: -K i ..I l...,. -;r.-11 r `,i 1! - 4;,,,.,.. :I I -i '-' "!:.-r - i " c I I - � I .'I I I J, .; �7 In, L., 1.414 1 Roparl. :ind Pr ) ic , i '.r.,l , K—IAA i a t)u,iul. I .l R L. -'!. ii. I ),U, .!-) A : ,.Li I.I: i j I 1,- `4 Aill I I M% SGSy. -At the request of Ilhe Sl-,i'k: Jlt,[oii, 1'rcw1-,:Aion Di\k--,: 0"MITI. dO.AL:ncnmrionol';:b�� 110�-11 Iilii 12. l o0l;. IIS r ![I., I '. % :j - X111,11 1,, hl I , I j I 1 14111.`1 7 �- I i P ir .ii Ili im -I :I I i - I 51'1111.' ,r K I,si r I I Li 1T ;I: ti I i, 1; -L - , I . 11 .'1 1 , I c ',,,I 1hQ A[, 1.14 -11111 .-11. 1;1- '. -11 111;1 •. I':'1: ,' :-1 i•1 11,' 1-,, 111 F I I I I I, and th11I '-I.- I I `-ii 11 -1 I-,I� I I I-1. I Ill-- :I IL" -I I%il, Ill l." -I M I I'll IIW 111-1- ilil -%•.,:,,n. 111c authors supol ad I hy IinOr 1.0 1 Awe rommy I -F I I 1 -00, L hey 10 .1 -.-M i,?,Lit their carr,i 11(1111.'1 ;1114 tk) d0111110111 I'. -",'vkLjIj219 SHE Kys YWAVY In % ICH:: "ih,- colmi k -C j),:panment or Pimung Mad July 30. 201 A (Mg. \o ),,c 1w �l I1'17 r.n11-.-,,14,d ',j '1C.-C-ld \i,% .,i i:!, :%., ' I,imm'at ci .I.J. %]-a-' 10 JWWA Y WMW MTMW1 1,"WM Y UNMe jlrzl, iou, aro 14:I1 a: IL 11111-WAI. iml I X114 tl-L - i I.- v. .11 i:-: :1-J �.Ivas :11117.LLA,.`d ':7_1 .11 ld-. I'll, 11 .�l .l -A�: 1 Ild I -ALL I .1 d"1,:Il: air mlagn,) . 1'1141All, : SCS WWII -1 cwd w,nd AA wy -d' 7G. 17 1 1' il : pwI ,:,-i -r.:i I 1 7-6- 02.1 -f) If!. ti 17 ip. !:14 ,--A 211-'i.: �!L, F i -.:1v 4 :-1 L I k I V -'I ;I -Id —h'l I irted Ek ih-; I I'l I II,11 I.. 1 1— vk� :Ilipl I I %.;I 1114' I i, 11,111 ilvllldeM ;:Ill I-ld f: I. the sou[];L•jvst oor'icr of the 111'. I' I, J, L area, The nv. ir.- L,!vj L:,:t area W01% SL]I7j LL I al. I ri all 'Iicj L-1 sC% ill- 'I - 14,::111% -m-- i-- I, I-, ldolllil'i,-d '.111'. 1 51. F. -k o oe -n L01% 6 v -Ii'�.--'> �i I -R111 1,: 11 '.-Lll L,1.44I 11'4 :,( -m - - I I,- I ir ;I 1,, 11 o, 1 1:1 11 L P r el 1, 11 .. 1 111 , -; i 7, .' .- I - I I,-; i. I I . I --,- 1, ir 1,':1,1-1-1 '--1— IOL1,1% 111!1-1 IM -3111.-d 'it-, (� 1,' '1 1! 01:41 ;1- :. 1) % CTC b4llIdQA1:%J I I 1--1 .11 :11%: ti 's zi.116 Ll;: :CMLL7: I' Q-','Ih,: YO I) 1 1'. on the PMMH nn= I Ill : - Il',", 101. 1 , I 111111 OL I I -M-11 I :d ,it., "01 :74 0 n W 0 A WC QMg a poi"n On oP "c 7m I -NA .%wvi K 114 311921 a SmA I ad I a net' a w1cmure WA 2 j 1111 L mc w, and mmh " 1- : Ow 4 1 1 QAm wme no mmains of n in ihc A Ili ird AIS (17,1cott and 2019. soL Fk7ur. 4,Audy '-31 was condiict-cid in IN 5.0 acre :fxilcl oL, IJL,: D I . k np .Lj-,::j jAjh: :3) 7q-011 :-po :1 dya MiLdWd The We pr ged arsa was M1tLwvd In a pc-.L-n,:r :,ixv, � and Twenty taro 41'.Z3 (Fig -In., 6) wi= pr-w,irfly 41vTkl.l LL 1,1 k,%111plelxes atIJ Imwos -: .,illl ', I'." -t 4`I „','1 ,-;l .,:Il , ! "i -e :1111:1'1-1. 1, li'T-Ir rik- �-1 :j;,-F1,,[Ij111jv 1}L'1 L:?; I I I- - o L: -r 1,:.5;1 .,:.- him -i -I :iid ..p -i d' Ai-, i,:il-.,;id 711P;1 -.,;I, w-wr-i,-id-1 Il -, FA 1--' %,: 17,1-1 lb.re were norem�hm of a in the pi. J,2. -i ;1":;1 5 i-------- --------------- - - E'9 Fr 5; 7.5-klinutc ScricE L S6's' kTogrAphic k1-1{^ sil."'Ill _q Loc a 41 1; 1!, OLAW-N-. N121 I Qn' .116 0 nlnph i 0 SONCL W - U S C i S. K 1: i L 1. L IL; d I QLl I f6a, f, k EI PROLI Ek I W1 _E_. , SUE RAtLk(JA b ULU ,mJ414m, I ROCKWALL cZZ=N1mv= 41, lip 491 641 SFTF SiSt" %FE z .41 L-9, % % 16 n -4151® "Ll"EJO.J2 M -I E MMIS� S I rE jcw-, !0IF.M6111 �TTF 304imi % , .1059H 11 V. % , Amb1h. % A ).11 S1 IT 11-54 A. \ % Figuiv 6: 75-NfintWv wT ia i 1S( > I ollognijdm: ah 11 sll(:%\ , I I P Louttions Of Project Ami Archacological Sitc-, (I-SRJ- 201 L Sou-rccs- Nnliunal Ciwgrarhic Socicly, ULSGS. Kcalak-ekLia Quadrang3c). 7 Evidence for a Ffa'p*AWaC;puvsv i Kale mi 116him) orholua cotir,c is Wry StTLIl."I' 2L- If _,,: L-111' 11 LIL'I I ;I pm n:,- II -x,.,- III 1'.+h 0 1'lk!tl 1111 Ll I I "'I ',IIAL .:11-1 '1 ..,-, .. .I'Ll 'I LAI-, li I-il.%,lin - Ill. mir lkl' C ot I ri l 1'.f7 o'l, ck: I I I I I I - I I II hL,II ht 11j-1 n I C I I L, I I k' I. I I I -AI Oil I ,I'':II I I-" ;II it I zl:,Ip�,Ir 119 VeTv staigbL s77w!,111 ocunes pa%4c! L11111 !Ohhi:LMILI I- '111eV I '��C in v ti I ,i 15f�a new the flop. or,,Imliw, 1-1--illion. IL' 4'11 1'•!Lrt 1lj ukldlll I d "M 1,10 'Mc largor rI,Ll- r,:n1L1',:LI !!QUI JhQ COW— :11 . Ill ,'I 115 ­mr.w, In $omt� Ar4aE I,: In ill,: L%] I.' L I 11 d ' L I I J ". LL %: ,I +IL: 0. 1.,% I : : i I I , d I5 -%:l ,,1111 roe].. In s Lich cases. 1h,: 0LII.,r L)r rh.: ik"IN V,- mLI.I :I, lk:l"k exh'�rid,li- from 111, �!,Wffid _-Q Ll: L(:Il -A Ll,,: .11 orlMi.I,LtJ Ajoitig C,,_, '41LLIl I-IdLI-1 AIL - I` 11L1 lbx,:ti,--uvik 41', -11 b.'d 11'1 MCk 1� Ll k '.I LA �'• -11LI.J , AULnk: Weft MOre SCI 10,1', I-AILIF, to .1 'Llvr Ll 1.1,21L A 1 1 -.1,: 1 1k:,- :',,I k J:_ L I I -c"J'A Ili I hdki,i - 'k 1' 2' %hupu_ .-:1. ::.d -'It [L'.. :Clll.l CA 11 1 N .'I.! Vn I I'll' 151'. IIIL':l ".:II in the 1'11,1:.: 1 1 [Al"21f0a. C lh� 1=11C h' 'I'I .:I IWIIIA !iL],: 111111 L:%Il Llte ;17,:.l 1 11-0101L.'.Ill -11 '1' .11 1 h- 11;1. :1 1"'1 .':I. .1.1j. j:II 11 .%: 1 -111%` k I. I I- : I I, b 1, I I I'„ I k- , I h ih i;m 1, :1r i -115- 1114'11'1","1.:i is 4. -1 1 -r 'd 11 .1 1,'.'I , ,II .,r �Wv- I 1:il - Oil. 'I !;-'I I- o 4iivl it .1111�11J OPi I I I I :l i I I I k I I I I I , I I r•7 m _: I I I I k 11 1: LIC Fi 11 1- 1 he 1' •Ali5 1.,4111-:'11 Or in JVI 1 .1—i I. mid i I I -e one of -1 jv.,mhIQ in EI .: 1'.: 1 ." '-. J.9 im-hl.ded in m M..2. 1.1,:,4 U; by 'I ::,-:uuS 910ne (1':j13AkLI L, I I1 _1i12 17. Stone is Ull :m CU11:A1';i' pr;icJz',%nc!r sp2JAivi ., it hohur. Aw entirety of Mr. 1:1 , locah�d on Lhc B,Lialoa Ilan )i-openy foltows. The Cillpha:'i'l i� )111114- ... in tile M01.111M ill - 11:'4 are alrw ili,. r�,mimjljrL '.1 1%.5I'J;IPS dUl 111d,' I11,'I Ill,' L:%I, 1� 1%li'. . .. k"T " L 1"!12 .lhI dC,� F, " I r I.,1 I,C 'A 1115 Imc (kilo wrj, 'dwsa it 111 Mid fl"Al '-01;1: V L NI -11 111: 1:n6 11 "1 11 %: Y ';FIIW.l llilk' 1 1-:1) 1 estiji-nate f f r 1, h jL AA ook ML I ro. 0 1 Ll. i P la: c I - 7: TiNuAloo inn NUP SheA4ine. V,.: i.:md I I...i I thi-, 'L i:,: ,,._I il- Ii 'I: I I I J; t, I I a : (!"I I PC3 I UL! 5`'. " -_ ' ; I I Of MOTC in 1, L I I IJ, %5 iddl my ng R"m W" n ffic area M !` i.. -;1 -1 i - ular lo v;ir4-i ro Lti iJ1hS 1hr,,ij-hoid !!I,- r: ill-- -;I I,, fiv,re iv rot, i0wj, ir 1,iii ii k to 11.• 'Jl. Wi I' 'AIIIIII . " IL0.' III,- .1i;1L iril 11:1 1-1, :i' i�t4fvawr ivilwithcre, edrr, all afilx ,,j-e,,rrj Finre, r�j ez.w. xw vfre�j ri lerpwelrabeuseff- f1faf if i,ifixi-fetowrej fr, hro I V fWi,Wf. ONd I hN Wt WC M eM 0 SkE io)X1W4,fjfw. Uia. the oral history ol the :I, I i i c I iLl I- �r I ri I! I :1i 11 1 h :fl t'lUall Y 'I J • ':.':11L 1- '-1 M -LU iffll AKM L L h] S ti I I de. [LMODL� 2002- 1 It) - I J 71 NO MS W M a Sal Akl (DL: 'Ll Alid 2'004, S", 4 jUdy 1.1 :,ild :,n rhL, ­iil. I Flh^do:l 11-11 -.-lip.,[ I.. I -I I: I, .'.(- I, -, , I w.1 " 4 study 13;. 1 ',)T -El I L:i ''.1w 1 L L I IJ I ani I I , .11 1 11 LI LI d 1 .1 1 til, ,11 L1W r;if! :.i Irxil I , A! Ll .1 1141-1'111 I) - I iA All 1 0-;1 r.,i:ILI 'A- :1 111 111c 17 [2C11t I oll J11J 01'.:4 U. A I . -r. Il'.i ,Ili- h-- :i,, nnp ';Ili.., my boa Am" rmi in, 1111: 1Caa.:LLLl,a17: NL; ;;:d.1':L:,.�1sLI1U1!11L tYici :11 J clonoii.-MLI.- bl N:l AJA ]i,:L! fi,):iJ, .`.­0,1Xi0n_.aid. lowd on a 1101 C"Cr h,"y he MAC M JjWW'j '1'.o mm twnc 0 LmdTmn%pvMwm D&Wn I k: j_<-1% .111d LLJ 4:I' i,i,: nwi& no ReAttimn PUB) Als wr no" A vi : la arnrc Hokisloa 1mi pmpeM abo did nol Mcnii(v any sacs related to a .-;I .w ti i r ; - .'-l;_� I I % , , I ; 11 ' 111 11 '- : 11 '41 j fL' Y I L` 'I aru L 1111"111 2f I arld :L:ikl:ii . : iillll-c 1. -1 lhc 11-0aJ A '11 i,, 11:11 k I 7, - I' , - I , I L 11 11 r I i i - _- I I - -I' I P I L I.111 I i %�I 11 I I.: i- i. -11 11. -.1 1 1111 kk V I 'A '11-1 Al i -I 1 i. 11 lA 1:' J ,.I: ;:ji:,� or,;11')111,2,alld rA.I., Ililel " 71., a4 m'•:Ikjlkl I!, CqVLWd A GIR She WOO MC WMWIMS Of It kahUa W:.,: A :gun 131 Th,: I I I I ' ' ': I - ' . : I '- :II I i , '. I I - I I '. . L , - ° I : asst! � . ( 5 , rl ci v I I � ! 1111, 16 1,:I 5 i I w I I . - : , . i1 I III: r I I : I I iL, -:I L1_111 •-tIddh I �,:J-nny : 0 1m! 1 11"d On nud Madrim 1 10 1- 1 h I In Dwk nAw 111C'110- 1-,-J I 1114101' -.1) i I L: I F : 1 I12 :11 1 :1 -,' ;' I - I . 1 '' "Cl -s' I ejc KQ 0, 1' 'L. , 1k ; I I ; I W1111 1711111'. corc Illi in p I k, Ili wall cow' ll JL ;l' A 1 11: 11 L'J to : I IA -A rOCk ti% A I" L01 islrl_lclic LIJU]3�:- HENKI; wa w& ;M-) MwdAR& `pro`:'.:" "d w- a pnowim, Tho wcstcm lomiinin c4'MColic Rmd Sit, 24'211 i7. al Hu2lalai Road- 111migh, it niiithl have -h,`,1L1 INI '. 1921; J t' 'LL116 I ]OLIN: [I,). HL, WE'SkJ11 IJ­11WL�, :-' l�'31 11-1.1 k at a rwrh Mh tA1 wy-YAn,13 3WA un east of Te DEA r,,k7i,,L ,:-, ;11, t,%- (-�L- L1'.,11 i" '.':' -'A Ill,' llmll`111 '::11.011 .­,Lil •-Ce 1 15 IIIJ I -,Ijl,. I II I.- —1.11-A1 Ill :d 1I.-il .111011 I I Ill,' I)I % I- .1j.'A Hit 110171',1'1 11-3il ;r IFL: "aill".1d Alm:, I .,:I) ]L: 'A' 'I..'V1L11 AF%2a, .S1110:11'.I'Lli I %'.. ' A:- ;I I C.Al-l'... —1.1 ,m,_2= FAE 29719 SITE 24211 HISTORIC ROAD sampsil. Su I c in mclem 4-931§- R9. -931rFi9re R: lfi-Jimkon Inn llivnerr. kl.ir. w iiif, 1 ',i<-'4'-" 1 [I -,L iri- RwJ '711d Al -Ju.. -A-11-11 "IL,:- Fj-'i. rm... R':' F.1:1_11 ug2b 7-'I9 2; ; I�I s s Fljmrc4. 7 5-.kjj­L, xL3r I L. 4— N.Ij-dO.prThl SliL�. HN PMR., NO.. lhwti.m, .1, 1 4-M -UYip. Aiqj" kM,m �Iig) —j—)I'rAj--, R .... L 1 -1. �, .l P1,1,1 A.I.IpIld le..... I X-1— I M14 T. IE 11 v , Y1l 7 5 { lLipre 1L: TMK: (3) 7-6-008 Map Showing Onentoteon of Site 24211 Historic Rand [Heave Hlmc:k Linel 14 2'SITE 21 HISTORIC. � 4 To RIC fMAD 6 1 or. so 11 4 P4-- A -A". . FiY,um 12: 19;;5 S urs Y "-11,m)!, rlNr,,L,i Cnl) Portion of Site 24211 Historic Road mid s jLaAV t ereue 4W. 16T C ti fix:. A* A�.�.. rYi'*¢ xrl F C I yr i e"; -.yeti• .^nW.�wnr..E .3r.�ev;,�r w'a �u�N nF rL +�lSR'f"f'ON a�:.Q�isFhrmr4'r eS% *e.N F6R l+''+7N cF a�-e.t. F�n.,Ll 'aLf�l:1 �•' L4?1Yi5 .: rr•:rr YFf +i �''#+F'!'�. 4. C'Ar :'YJ�:.I fo F+. lG:awama:u .W., 7 -C -.t e- figure 13: 1955 Survey Plan of Uppa (Eastan.) Portion of Site 24211 Historic Road and IIawai`i T3ah Road Nattta]alt(a IIIighway). 16 LA -11 TA � 1 np.ro14Silo'=lFfiweoulega.1Y4n1i�chi�fl►sel�arbrdFaalwnrwi ariSp, 17 FlZure I& Phdagirapli al'Skc 29211 HYSmric Road and flack Walla, Sbo wikv, kfnewn Ciraind Sudkc, Looking Ea.,l (lx c . ...:. 7013.24)_ 19 I are several wal ..1 4:111;:1I^ :{Citi :ort ds on the 1.J1 -51 area, sou-. i -I .I i: ui! I I ir, I i II are n c i i J I 117c Irbil i. ,c c 7'i �L i rL 6 and i i i;,Iem mck -i' 1-.;i -;illel id "17" cmlxlriicl,"I ".111" h, I -.1-L d' 1k:: --ii io, :1 1 i-rin ;11'1 ;11 11 w I w% %% .-r i, IJI F ;111,1 1 & 'I II' d I -.,I I. 11•� 1, 1.,I 1 IL-11 `.+;111 'We I ort Ciis a II I III L r I II k• i 'i i , i , i il.d do I Ir I iL: 1 1714 LV` 4 111 1; L' 1:. ;1-14. 1 ;rIVOj 1. ITMI.I.- HI L' :I 'I I t I I Ill I" I X1.1 1'. I1 :1 ..1 Lf -Wase I I& v. Lllt 17:71:1 " "I1 1; 17 1 -. I I Ll I J - k I F] `-i': '% - PI%% I I LI ti cven. it ',1 i[11 11;L1111,A; —1-11 level and Is di111Cj hou1&r�'. the Oill\ -q1erp=IIJ theOurrcm )!:A projeclawaar,z Sit-: K 1X2- !,:.LLLII,: 11, ik"-:1 7, c n dic noll I i.- - n and noJ7 ll,':)S 1 11 I7orl;OTJS Of I 'k' -Ar1k r1 -0a, I,:, I,,: I% I-;,: ::SOLI[: ,'.1.1d I L I,' 9 j IS Z.1 1 J: 74 Lt Cd ,L'C51.1 � 1111: 15-. �. 1..1,'. I', I .::l ld -c')) 111"' '1 awi'dcd Ic-hn V un,i f Fwj u -L: I -L I I.' `. 11" .7LLCI to �'�L,!Vl 11 dco &I'LLAL:J !!I [I,: t Llll:",: 1`I ]'+28' 111,9p "111,: 37! 1',? 1'1.L[Lir,: 11 1k;LiL11,:11 I CA blOLIVMUCVW111 mid !,:,kiart3 is the ]:,)Tlhcm LCkboL;rid--, ,5 UL J ik: end of FCZIL1'r 3 tern ':.I. rn 1'1c w-lh hank- ot a oidch and lhmijr, a ,.kn in lb,c I -inure 2 wall at the szm;': I, [-' Ill, ::1r:11d %L -.ilb, h-),L:i:JIA a h6lua co�um�l:, the cQLLJ'1%2 '-1 OLE,i tilllpty into & large 1r'.11i,:h. 43 Iiich i; an utili!iL:Iv .Lmai io T-0 mmal II -1-1 I III o.•: .1., 1,,,411i-.I;i i" 1 W,11.Ur0 2) was L,!;,, d1ILA1 I 1---h: :d in an Als rc!T'" I J1 I7" I'l 111111 IL 7L'I1-11 ji i 14'1: 41, 11, IIILI,ir,. T)I:..% mv:i H: xv I Di "I,'- '1 1'. 1 1." 1 d' :.1 1 1 11 I I,' .'I I I I I I I I I. I II I, :II..:11 I I T ; I I I--, i.- :r, r.I :,lulu., II'.11111'1111, I )I- I,-':,1 11":. 1,1: .:I': :11'.. 1 .' I I- :I or '-'Ill 1�!1.1-11.1 •Ll!�LCQ 75L--."llt7 1':'I, I)I-,A -1111 I'm L11C— 1. X1-11 5.001,75.14';..11%. -17. Li I 1 101 1 N ; k'I CC 'I 7,':11'1.,:1; 111J:L -'%-" Mb I ,.,.0 —.11ILT'l I i L:': 1 11;u 3 a 0L 11J I. I : I I ILII-1'•111of a k-.1'. :717,1 m 1--k ri1, i,jo di prvp i nL4 I 1':L! M c') h I) :117d lkm I Wk. It I c'' L't 7.1:1%' 11 1 11L Umwc 11 1 rc-, 'in t1w pr 5jocl .WC11 .Md %vould be vcxy AL`nsy to 11iorc are 110 NULAI ',.',ithm tho DLA 19 M1 I. A -ps NiFy 7 2r Fiviiii- Ito: 7.'-M iriwc 'ic—, ( "m is M:1j, I —Alilli "1' 1 .111d ( 0111'TiK'k'il ink, I Ild ( 11'3111T Ali.L llli Nll`jaCl %Fc:i kN'l I I' %I 141 i 'T" _W13- 3'.':AjaUku;l Qiwd' Dula Sotll,­: \'moru, I( ,:l% - 1 m ;N- RO Rt-.,fiwl.w Lop 111;.1 U.'eigirniken I , ANwrHil the Pre*mce of a HfTlurr Ni it It in the 1PF-4).it-vt ,AI[ -ea nutiliber of Con-iirk on Fol-ni D,chrcii-n. and ,',Iicr kriven cnrnrii-ivs; (irit-kibly 1TrAlj4s 101,-i S 1111 1A '% -111! .:L ' x. ;i I C.- 111.1, +'I':I i: -I I. A , 'h.] :"Ikll, J i d, ,-I III: l7l<<I Ir II , 1, 1 -o.ipp"a-- ti 111� I 111 11 1 L 11 11'� iiii, lo .lidJ-ii, ` —:11 , -, I i, h mLICA �96ffl lNow ; :ii -. ; ll �- Orw .,T 113L 111-- .1-1 11 :1 1 -11 ,o 111L \ \c I M 13",-:iw NII- �10U,� 11'. --T'.:I-1 — .'Ll,( I ',"Ilk) : 1,l:1- 8bOL11 l:!, 110'IzAI-M r.::."^ - lopli'licd cl,7IJI 11:iiii ploljdod. 4% 1,. Ax,:� 111,; 210:116 :L[4 TOM "'.10.c.: :tnd a Kona 1 1',1;a 13Q, -CAI :!I1:l'.A11:Y biLlit dOi8S I101. AV'.' : Ic onlail or jtl'j 0i ll� 1:1 I-l"PlIMIC."IL .1,111rl [n Ill. log i nI d�, to '-t h, rni I i oii of the IP .11 A a c Q I Muo lir I I L L :It 1 1:.:4 1 o -A ti�� L I ' '.':.I Mdk:' '.1 --.1 lfI J 3%;II, ++ZIIAEI t [I r -,,I I Llt"11L 17 :1 'S'i!e 31 41 Qmmv 2 mid &mum 3 wWk n Wd"n IV. Primarily. Mr. Sr -mL, i-CSIli-II-C. -- 'V ], :IC,'Lll-A 'a, iIkird 1[1111-m iczllC,: of [.,I,: I. %J .1111.1 A,-,[� L"'a't -hi ff., amw' wbi ho" w,n ISM 7o A tali wd Kenuhmi -I-. 11,c Lxllflh [ Ix Lllvi I %I' Ina I", M .:I.- 1'1-t wipp,'ll 1:% 1 11; Voll, L. -A" 1, i-!iolls 01 r: 'L ;I '," ilS U-TIMCOM 10 IN aaili.l .11 -al —' 11101 -' Ll, Lurv; 1:!.! ;I. - �1-;d irl tl,c llk.,;I1 {o, ,;.:I I .1 11!1' CIO .111' Ii)L imir,! Iliatt 1.0 kill S4 iwl .11C DFA :110 OWN OW Ir VNIMM Of WIAN �,LMd " OWMPAMAll wv,i-i F11, I,1, -i- A .,I ,k jl°ljrl fliv ! 10... X-,wlivci I-.. ', !, wa Lt Mr, sloTl'.- Amver IlIVIL! is InQ (10 C+. 11174 rI :,d OtRI hi,; I - r3. .I- L I I I I I : , 1, 11 :)31. Or a h,5( 4j uolP— c1,v,l..d I.ill i 11 7. ' " In j. r ':I In Pi a A -amaw PREIN, I 101 q Desilets. M., aricl 1� RoJitin:111 20" -?-1, {"PeVkVe,!';, f rr'(M rM,h-r:w, ry I' I k L I I I", - I :w2l Ill. 7. HM". ti .lIkI III). W ',A -CL 1 :1. 1:1 ;: I - I I :i ..II ,.u,• - 11 , I ;I 'N ni I. Dimk:s. A— L Z -m -N. ;krl,l I" k. Awi in , "'- i, � " ; ' 2-' i --F;: I ,jj . �( M6 'L�Q [1011 RC4),X5.'.1 [11 d I or &inrci �apoz:i. Kailaa-Koi-,a E.won. G- anu ",, I.,LoiE qMa ;;j Kona L I aJTAIK: (3) 7-6-02J :017 poy'.J- prCpIr"d for Kona M, LLC, S CS Rcp-n 1471, Honolulu. 2.020 ca! -`p rc �r.nvj, Re! orf Iepr 76. 71 L.Ti�,7 L cX'(.'ICd i, 0 b,,? 0 111. 1.- C. -A J •I L ILL T la-mmar. I1 1T.. WA 1 1 m,1 ).V. tih ikld,cr T. lur Ibe I L -II on file ill -1 1: P I ".11,Ak., I- I z I .I7 "21-11 ills? Srudi.r COMIU I:LId, Ft nds. and Their A7ana, Hawai'y, ?.lk: �3) .7-6-021:016 spear.)- Report prepared by Cultural Surveys 12"0 (')L'I'J1'- ilL [,T.,(;. R,'Fs07- I 1`.71 f"Ih- 11 1+ w ,-,HPD Library- Kapolei. Ilukui. NI.K.. S. Elbert and E. Mookini 1974 Place Names qj�osra.--. I. in,M:IL-, 01'II,L%IA!i 22 Recl-dnim R. >f,rbv fTrwWalaa Tn P7 property), f WK"r: 3- 7-6- H,., '.I ... : "a, Morth KotTo Dwrict, Islo.ndqf R mL Consul I lj ig I(L�puj I R L:-OXUO. Prepmed for Casmrdm Hamn, L Stone- -f_ 20D2 '111�wiSMllllffllfflki-- L, k� PAIL 1,r AA.:-; iff i LC in I 23 DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY -COUNTY OF WAWAVI 345 KEKGANAb'ASTREET, SUITE 20 HILO, HA AI'I 966720 TELEPHONE (808) 961-8050 • FAX (BO8) 961-8657 ,Aui? u N 1 15. 2022 TO: '%-Ir. Tendo K rn , 1 i i c too V'l:lC1C1111W �1+~p,Irt1r411t l'ROIY t.4 11 K }I [olllF li+'' S`'I i . _el t. Ilii.1 !1rigineel . l lI~IE:f"1`: 1 'Ir:ill f' !,t 1k111 >tilc'r1111rr�'r11 .111}lrlit.Ition No. PL-REZ-2[12?-11D0033 Altl@`lidnit'Irt to (Al.1fl'?V 11-I`AIlllc Of`LlltIMICC Nu. 02-131 Applicant. Kona 'I h rvi-- I . i A Rt-que,;t: lel-Year'Flmu t''k1cIIni1In r1F Currrph- With Condition I (( I>II11►1Cw [ 1pnstrLIC(li'll III Fluse I] .rind :xinendmCnt to Condition N t fdlr.Itl►r;t1 lk dicati{!Ir ) I:I\ %LA P Iti1't --6 02)1:010 :In tll? , ,' ll,' • .' 1'.."� ." ';,��I Y.�_t. I } I', 1,511;. k'�.�.� ., - .' 9�'c. I �I�� , '�. il'ii' t'YIII1'1}:.,,� � I;I110.'::4` I:� •.l';_ 11,' slllT�llt`,'.11t 4fEt, l I_'i}li .1.1 ._')AlL':lhlc Water SyS1.E`l171tY':i Udl 11:li.t14:' ljC4'':; Lltl:':lil•I i.5 11111£: �mdf-rpeak-fl4�Iwani f'I :-Il..'�'.t. 5'�.'lls� "IY ll' .I_:4.'C-;..�..61:4'� i,.:11111he %Fetter :��.:•1t17-I °�t.11r�i:�l<�I�.:t-'�.::I':� 1�1:14�� .rr�ci T�u�ullxlic�n:� cri�ttl� i ���I'.u�tul�'I:I ���r .:.I:_'I ,;'I,;y�, +wtrl�;u'u�'t;,+ls I+1L:1.. : 1�1►.Ir�tl f } a I1tuli wi(rtlsl en inrE°t. I'.;.r,tl«re(1 111 IlI4• St.Ite I;i lla a6'i, tcyrreview and uppEol aI. 1'Ic°<1;c: r11sI; tI1:It "114 1 ►' I�ttrllll�'tll 471 W:Ik: S:Ijlplk 111:11. ],otable watei- i5 I1awlil`i Island's, 1iw,,t precILIll: it",I':1i ti ti:11%] :i1CI11.1lcl'L:";;lil', 4:5.111111111111'1[' i "Ll pronit)Le ,,�:rtcr Lwin er's't>til.lTland reserve the ;1,J liv of k4:rt ,r I,lr tic mi-:, 1111'll IN (lt1� 1LV1jL r)LII1�L , 'lily. Ilt:` dL-: 1l411)L:L:ldi.il"t' a; Il1k: 1.1111 1lslt:ll'al' dk111;14"1! s`I 1% 'fl(- 1'.1 1111'11`•"Irl,::` Ik, dcmiind or ;11"I51ti "i ,' lil 'S{117h11• 1111' dclll-VII I).% 1.11,''1M1,2 Il: tlllstl'+ { I.L' IC 1-l1iil,_'1_l "`C .'l1',I,' wa(e0. 1114' ,-%-et;III water I�'9'; 111 `,IIIlIII,I �`L` 1 '�ltlht'LI'1` tllY' te,l1�'I 11 t' s flli'f i'l lte t�1t' It' 14 t'll!':I� ll�.:I1lIt� ILI11?- t� II 1''•4'lllti.S4.'S�, ',1+'ich ltoijld reducc Ill o t k1kti lIlm! I,::111�, 111dt 4:.111 I}4 clot,,:d. Addiii(ni r1 kwut l k:t 011J 111.x' 11,)1Lll 1.11111111iff Of V0,110 Willem u11411:aled t4) tlrc �,tltajeCl Pitl'Lek t, Ilk -It t1�';Sllahl�. Nk I, .' :PA' 1'0 1;014;4:11011 10 1.115: mlltil4:cl 11111"• c, 1Acl'1s°il rUc}i.14., t.to the applicant understanding and LA4L�-lv�t l�•°.` t.l lill. 1.iW� 1�L I1,.i111I�'1L i�L.l} ll. kl'S.,�.kl}I:5LM1.1 ll�i. (i.:"t.11. 11.1. �i L�l 11'11 4Y �t: i�tLr. Planning Dep;. s t' r.wr. Our 9I4ost �Prr"6l<m0Z?source ... 'Kjz Wai-A'i0ne. ° , Exhibit 4 1 t,u "Leportmeot of Vi ater Supply Is w Equa3 Opporlunity provider and employer MT. Zen& Kern, Dl[',', :ter Page 2 Argus( 15. 2022 "111, 11; 1 L, I I)LTL' FIC "EV, 1 1 4 IF I I) d T It! tti I \ I T- It QI t I tL) 1-1, [114) i I OUr Water uid Phmll'llw! kl.Lll,!l 11 c\1cw", 7NI sl1iccvcl1 .%oum z- 111clill 11— (1k,lillolo. P'T". V-ari-L,:4cr-� lil�l Lngincer I I' ( '.) L ' I copy - DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS COUNTY OF HAWAII HILO, HAWAII DATE; October 5, 2022 TO. Zendo Kern, Planning Director FROM: Department of Public Works, Engineering Division SUBJECT: Change of Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 Amendment to Change of Zone Ord. No. 02-131 Applicant: Kona Three, LLC Request: 10 -Year Time Extension to Comply with Condition I (Complete Construction of Phase I) and Amendment to Condition N (Roadway Dedication) TMK. 7-6-021-.016 and 017 Sorry for the delay. We have reviewed the subject request forwarded by your memo dated July 12. 2022 and provide the following comments: 1 _ Condition I - We have no abjection to the request for a time extension. 2_ Condition N - The extension of Paulehia and Hdomana Streets within Pualani Estates to the north and Kekuana`oa Place and Leilani Streets within Kona Vistas subdivision to the south, along with the interconnecting road between these two extensions and to the Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway, all of which shall be constructed as dedicable minor collector roadways which include but not limited to a fib -foot wide right-of-way with concrete curbs, gutters, and sidewalks with associated drainage features, streetlights, signs, and markings. Therefore, we have no abjection to the verbiage proposed to be deleted. However, we have concerns about the mauka-makai road not being a continuous thoroughfare like Puapuaanui Road to the north and Laky Street to the south. We recommend that the mauka-makai road be continuous from the extension of Paulehia Street and Kekuana'oa Place for the best flow of traffic when connecting to Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway_ Therefore, we object to the addition of new verbiage to include Figure 3- Conceptual Building Layout in the Final Environmental Assessment - Royal Vistas Housing Project dated September 2021, Planning Dept. Exhibit 5 C0L77Ik(111ILM L1 Li LM FiULAl)PPLr-tLL111_kProI LSlL,'T Mil I.TnPIf1V,-r Memo to Planning Page 2 October 5, 2022 3. Condition Q —Refers to a drainage master plan. a. Land Use Com m ission Docket No. A83-549, item 53 states "Petitioner will build and dedicate to the County of Hawaii all drainage facilities recommended in the Drainage Master Plan for the North Kona Flood Control Project within the boundaries of the subject property." Plate 5 of that plan indicates the proposed improvements as of 1974. Our records do not indicate that all of the requirements were fulfil led or removed. b Previous owner, Gamlon Corporation, had submitted construction plans titled "Kamehamalu Rise, North Kona Flood Control Project" that indicated an interceptor earth trap channel along the east boundary and concrete lined channels for Horseshoe Bend Stream and Holualoa School Stream as well as the combined portion in parcel 16. The construction plans also included a proposed concrete channel within the makai area of the State Department of Transportation right-of-way. The construction plans were never approved since the designer stopped submitting revisions addressing DPW's comments and therefore never constructed. c_ At the end of 2047 and beginning of 2008, DPW met with Tim Esaki, the current owner's representative, and planning consultant. Sid Fuke. Notes for that meeting includes discussions about "comb -Ing the flows", "culvert at the south end of the property will probably have to be improved to accommodate the additional water caused by the convergence of the two floodways" d. Now 26 gears later, this work has not been completed and the current owners' consultant has stated that combining the highway crossings will create overtopping which of course is unacceptable to the State. However, re-designing/re- constructing the crossing with increased capacity (ie_ more culverts, larger culverts, bridge crossing)to avoid overtopping is a possibility in conjunction with a basin upstream of the Kalani Makai channel or by adding storage capacity upstream of the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway crossing. Questions maybe referred to Robyn Matsumoto at 901-8924_ C0L77Ik (11 IILMJLL1 Li LM Vii ULA S1pgLr-tuni:w I'MI Ld'T Mil VI Ln -Ir County of Hawaii Department of Public Works - Traffic Division September 28, 2022 R&A6W &wK 4 57eym To: Christian Kay, Planning Department From: Aaron Takaba (ATT), DPW TRF Reference Name: Reference Number: TMK: Royal Vistas (3) 7-6-021:016, and 17 Item Pg No Comment B I Signalized intersections along Hwy 11: Palani Rd, Henry St, ATT Malulani Dr, Nani Kailua Dr, Puapuaanui St, Lako St, Seaview Cir, Laaloa Ave, Kamehameha III Rd. Why were the highlighted .................................... _ __ intersections not studied? ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Hwy 11 at Lako St EB left turn is very congested in the AM ATT during school traffic and in PM peak hour. This has caused problems on lower Lako St and Kupuna St. Other than mitigating the cut -through traffic on residential Kupuna ATT St, I feel the benefit of the Lako St extension is minimal with respect to the scope of this study. This extension would probably add more traffic to an already congested intersection at Hwy 11. Hwy 11 is very congested, particularly in the AM peak northbound. ATT It has been observed that the pinch point is Lako St and back-ups occur from Lako St to the adjacent signals includin Seaview Cir, Laaloa Ave, and Kamehameha III Rd. Lako St traffic signal is currently split phase, I believe due to a ATT sight distance concern westbound and possibly eastbound. This phasing, while it may address a safety concern, is not efficient since ou add another clearance phase to the c cle. Changing Lako St signal from split phase to a concurrent green ball ATT will be difficult due to driver habits and sight distance restrictions. Significant improvements should be made at this intersection to improve sight distance and to provide protected left turn phasing (State standard) or protected/permissive if approved. Also, dual left turn lanes (and Hwy 11 widening) should be provided eastbound as the AM count is nearing 300 vph. Please confirm/explain how LOS at Lako St is best with split phase ATT emissive left turns is second best). Adding lanes on Hwy H from Henry St to Kamehameha III Rd is ATT needed now as AM and PM peaks typically result in large backups. Generally, northbound in AM and southbound in PM. Planning Dept. Exhibit 6 Z:\2 -PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS\N. Kona\Royal Vistas\Royal Vistas TIAR Review -210928 (ATT).doe County of Hawai "i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. Page 1 of 2 Hwy 11 at Hualalai Rd (south): ATT My 2021 comment to May 2020 TIAR: "WB right turn LOS F with project." Updated Nov 30, 2021, TIAR does not show LOS analysis for WB right turn from 2024 without project (pg. 28) and beyond. Proper mitigating measures for right turns (acceleration lane recommended by 2024) and left turns should be provided. There is no recommendation to address the left turns once roundabout was found to degrade overall LOS, Hwy 11 at Royal Vistas Roadway: ATT WB left turn LOS F in 2024. Mitigating measures are needed, such as: -Right in/right out; -Connection to Lako St; and -Improvements to Lako St since recommendation is to divert traffic to Lako St with Phase 2. Connection to Lako St needs to be made from the onset versus before....occupancy._of..phas.e...2............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Hwy 11 at Lako St: ATT -EB left turn LOS E to LOS F in 2024 without project. -WB through/right LOS D to E in 2024 with project. Significant improvements need to be made due to the added traffic on Lako St generated by the Royal Vistas development and the eastbound left turn approaching 300 vph. This should include a WB dual left turn lane, Hwy I I road widening, and WB right turn acceleration lane. Hwy 11 at Kamehameha III Rd: ATT My 2021 comment to May 2020 TIAR: "Overall LOS BIC to LOS C with project. WB approach LOSE with project." Why did the LOS values improve with the updated Nov 30, 2021, TIAR? ATT Critical unsignalized intersections, including Kuakini Hwy and the ATT two Hualalai Rd intersections need to be evaluated further. Current study identifies low LOS but recommends doing nothing. Need more inforination to determine how much Alii Hwy would ATT mitigate traffic concerns alone Hwv 11. ZA2-PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS\N. Kona\Royal Vistas\Royal Vistas TIAR Review -210928 (ATT).doe County of Hawai'i is an Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer. Page 2 of 2 a� �Y{'. 4 Mitchell D. Ftotl� Ramxi I. Mansour Mayor y � ` • + LJ�� Lt 14f! Lee Lord Brenda Iokepa-Mases '"� Deputy Director Managing Director County of H wai"i DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 345 Kekuanao'a Street, Suite 41 • Hilo, Hawaii 96720 - cohdernCwhawaiicounty.gov rh (808) 961-8083 • Fax; (808) 961-8086 MEMORANDUM TO: Zendo Kern, Director Planning Department FROM, Ramzi I. Mansour, Director Department of Environmental Management DATE July 24, 2022 SUBJECT; Change of Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-004033 Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02-131 Applicant: Kana Three, LLC Request: l 0 -bear Time Extension to Cumply with Condition I (Complete Construction of Phase 1) and Amendment to Condition N (Roadway Dedication) Tax Map Keys, (3) 7-6-021:016 and 017; N. Kona, Hawaii The Solid Waste Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments andlor recommendations (contact: the Solid Waste Division for details) ( ) No comments, (X) Comrnercial operations, State and Federal agencies, religious entities and non-profit organization may not use transfer stations for disposal. (X) -Aggregates and any other constmetionfdernolition waste should be responsibly reused to its fullest extent. (X) Ample and equal room should be provided for rubbish and recycling. ( ) Green waste may be transported to the green waste sites located at the West IIaai`i Organics Facility and East �lawai`i Organics Facility, or ether suitable diversion Programs, (X) Construction and demolition waste is prohibited at all County Transfer Stations. } Submit Solid Waste Management Plan in accordance with attached guidelines. { } Existing Solid Wastc Management Plan is to be followed. Provide update to the department oii current status. } Other: Planning Dip;. County of Hawaii is an Equal 0ppartuni[y Provider and Employer Exhibit 7 Ramzi I. Mansow, Director July 20, 2022 Page 2 The Wastewater Division has reviewed the subject application and offers the following comments and/or recommendations (contact the Wastewater DlviSion for details): ( } No comments. } /require connection of existing and/or proposed structures to the public. sewer in accordance with Section 21-5 of the Hawaii County Code. ( } Require Council Resolution to approve sewer extension in accordance with Section 21- 26.1 of the Hawaii County Code, Complete Sewer Extension Application. ( X) Require extension of the sewer system to service the proposed subdivision in accordance with Section 23-85 of the Hawaii Comity Cade. Check or line out as applicable: [ ] If required by the Director of the Department of Environmental Management ("Director of DEM"), [ ] applicant shall conduct a sewer study in accordance with the applicable wastewater system design standards prior to approval to connect to the County sewer system. Applicant shall provide such sewer line or other facility improvemcnts as the Director of DEM may reasonably require, which the sewer study may indicate are advisable for mitigation cif impacts of the proposed project. Contact Wastewater Division Chief for details. Propased activity may be subject to existing or future federal, state, or county regulation under Title 40 CFR 403.5, prohibiting discharge of certain pollutants into publicly owned tmatment works. Contact the Hawaii Depart --hent of Health for inforirlation regarding pretreatznernt ;standards. ( } Applicant shall fallow Department of Health regulations. No Ilmvai `i County sewer System in area, ( } Other- RM,pls HAWAII EIRE DEPARTMENT. COUNTY OFHAWAII . MLD, HAWAII 96720 DATE Jule 1+ 2022 Memorandum TO CHRISTIAN KAY, PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM CAPTAIN CLINTON BAYBAYAN, FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU SUBJECT- KONA THREE. LLC'S CHANGE OF ZONE AMENDMENT APPLICATION. In regards to the above mentioned project, Fire Department Access and Water SLipp)y shall comply with Chapter 18 of the 2018 IIav aii State IFire Code and Chaptcr 20 of the Ilawaii County C odc. If any building are required to be sprinklcred, they shall e()mply with NFPA 13, 13D) 13R, 2016 Edition. For an question please email (J-1nton, Fi�vl�,�}�tnr��i��,�t:��iA000ntv'1_10% or call 808-32t476 1, Respectfu11'v Subll]Itted, Clinton Baybayan Hire Preventiorn Captain Fire Prevention Branch Hawaii Fire Department Planning Dept. Exhibit 8 Mitchell D. Roth Lke E. Lard 4irrr a.c g lhricrlirr Tt„Wcrr 11, Commaasd Orrrur Sine K. Triune HonA_e:rrm .-rafni ar_wrreirarr Harry M. Yodn e,�r real I/m auag .-Idrr onsdrtrrur County cel' Hai►ai'i (tl'kiW v of How iw-v and Conilniunity Di�velnpiine tit =}1h; x' r k � li' .. ,,�.. { �;� t,ll4 � 9'1i M1, .rr,,. N k� b:,ri, . I_ _ u: u, t I _ u"i �6?_ . i r s I .wa i;, r I I,. 1� .-- 642 • Fax JN08i 959-4}30 November 30, 2022 Via Electronic Mail Zendo Kern, Director Cr;unty of Hawaii Planning Department _7 1 a',i_rahi Street. Suite 3 Ht ; Hawai'i 96721-5293 Zendo,Kern havwraiicounty.gov I BJEC i : APPLICANT: ISONA THREE. LLC PROJECT NAME., KCNIA VISTAS TMS.: (3) 7-6-021.016, (317-6-0.?l ().17 Dear Mr Kern, The County of H+ I ; !;;iGe of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) would like to take this opportunity to comment on the rezone amendment application for the applicant, Kana Three, LLC, who plans to amend Ordinance 02-131 for their Kona Vista's project: The OHCD entered into an affordable housing agreement with the applicant on January 10, 2022 (' Agreement") and recorded with the State of Hawaii Bureai.l of Conveyance (Doc No. A-808-0{0287) on ,January 25 2022 The Agreement required earning a total of sixly-seven (67) housing credits based on a ten percent (1411/x) affordable housing requirement required by the. State I -and Use Commission Decision and Order. Docket No. x,83-549 dated December 13, 1983 (-'LUC A83-549" ' ). as amended. Tama: App: icant desired to satisfy this requiiement through the purchaseof sixty -seven (67) excess ho.,,*ing credits verified by the OHCD to satisfy their hcusing condition. To date, the lapplic,ant has not satisfied the Agreement Sincr_� the applicant Intends to amend Ordinance 02.131 at the Planning Corminission -fooling on December 15, 2122 .he 01 f-) kindly requests via HCC Chapter 11 Section 11-4(4j that the condition be Upd lted to rf•fdect the current housing conditions of HCC Chapter t ) requiring the applicant to eam Iiow.,inq r:redits equ81 toy twenty percent (201/) of the number of nifits or lots (rCA m, it:(d :,,� Ilatnearest 15). 11' I : IV,0IT" Planning Dep,,,. Exhibit 9 k:QJa_ HL)LJSING OPPORTUNITY Zendo Kern, DiFector County of Hawaii Planning Department November 30. 2022 Page 2 Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Please contact Anne M.0 Bailey at (808'� 323-4303 should you need any further ass;stance_ Sincerely, Susan FIL K'tmz H ous ini St ra to r 1-:41 DAVID Y. IGE o "q.• 3CVER*I1:1ROFKAVAii yhr��;45g�� iy 1 i ' S STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P.C. sax s16 HILO HAWAII 96721-D916 N1F.MORANDUM DATE- July 13, 2022 TO: Mr. Zendo Kern Plaiming Directot'. County of Hawaii FROM— Eric Honda District Emironmemtal Health Program Chief ELIZABETH A. CHAR, M.D. DIRECTCR OF HF.L 1 SUBJECT: Change of Zane .Amendment Application No- PL-RE.Z-2022-000033 Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 0-131 Applicant: Kona Thrcc LLC" Request; IO -Year Time F.xtenslon to Compiv with Condition 1 {end Amendment to Condition N. TNIK: 7-6-021:016 and 017; N. Kana, Hawaii The development misists of 0 1otsldweltin units or more. -I'he use of individual wastewater systems Es nat allowed under the provisions of Hawaii Administrative Rule Chapter 11-02_ The development shall connect to the County sewer s}stern (as indicated It will) or provide plans for a wastewater treatment works as applicable_ The Wastewater Branch does not oppose the time extension proposed, Planning Dept. Exhibit 10 STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813-5097 September 3, 2020 I )4 ; I r :.9 s. I c i -'c bv I -c .. If L 'IV 1, 'Is 4 1) Ko 2. 1 1::1 d ,I I I i I Tax Map Kuy Nus.: (3) 7-6-021-1 016, 017, 018, and 019 , ADE T, BUTAY ONRECTOR Deputy Domed or L YNN AS ARAKkRF;GAN mfzm� J CHOW ROSS M. H IGASHI EOW04 H SNWEN IN REPLY REFER TO' D IR 0740 HWY-PS 2.3918 Th4aprllc4wt. Korial"hrec I l.Cprops(!s lo devt1op 71) tjcrcs of -,oc.1w hind in.W d !Iullil 1:111111v ;i,, 450 Units, n3111 -!i:1k 1,111:1r.cel as I pi"Tellv IS 1410,11011 ivoil. 0111v w1c, 1 "'rl' 11�1 , --,11 . " - IkIl'41 IE, (Sta(c. R k I "- 1�1- I I I % I I ; Ll I'll I I I J'r 111 U 11; LWI "1 (111 'A ! l I1 K . 1.! 11 ` I I I I I I!, T11L.- T)LA Should 11,:J�-,Ao4 7'c and I)-' LIFAIIJ. I I 4:11 L rl ill },..III .°i1 I 1 I - i I ; I I I 1 I I L! I I -% % "1;1 11-11 pac [ cd I I I ) IVIII I I C1 off Ti 4 11 OIL' 1) '�ed Lb.:CC�,' 1w1 KaahL.1111L111U v, Ih appar;j-ffly can1]ICL44]Lhiflld 11 1: 111 -7- ki.11: I Ll Iv :Mfrs. I liL: T:-afl-lc Impact Arjl:% '.4 R':rt'1-1 I I ]AR, 11,C: 1110 RL val Vtsta,, ti--LIccl NE'ay 2020, was 11, 114 CLJ I i\ 11 1)(° j-, € I o I hi - I t1 V I -'w, ;l: i I )q); i d m --i t of Transporti 11 11 00T) has R I- 1-1k`-1 L Ili. lc��Iilt to 111!� CA'1�11 - I i11I N, P i,, i:1L II1)a01 ! ILIII�r(! LJ)j.LLj' �ed 2. Ph'w;e I orthe j1ro1je1-'7 1 . coinplele(l by 2024 m,ith the onlY dt"Ct" 11 1'1,11- 111 i 114as a :'Ll or Lldm 'I c I 'I J 'c" I-- Rl." ILIVI�i11'iC and or!ikv.:' t2wk1l--`d Planning Dept. Exhibit 11 HWY-PS 239 19 OPtI11114 Sh1S LLl+_€ 111.1"! A,L :0111141111111} all I111110I C0114'001 I LLLI':!II'.`' "I'll al_IL'I I1.1 O -C1;1'^ I�;I;II1'tI17��1L1I1 I I:".1.:1�=,';I't 6',111. t€'.L. oftici.,fl 11':?11,~ri l'tatiOil V.II• -- V1111 '1I %,!a from IIIA' I �,: c i�nl"11:I1SI'}' 1"]��el{,€,!14rnI I'I;II). l I1tiA-� L11I.IL C. ,I,! 1[:Ill II. 'li'hlCi St ,,- tip I.,,"klI''l '�ll'ti't.'I. illld P-,il-I€thia I:I,,'�-,',IIICII IIID.'• 1-" di+ll I: Irl €}haw € I,I Iii-• ', 162 „w k ;; t[1 I I IC jjrC)je [ I ]11' tII'c'111:1t1 �' ;I :II'.�i` ;Ilrllllil :I1.I.II.t' I1''I :I{ lti to IIIC 7IU.,,)' i11! -L.: I!1 �1'•��`IIf},lM L,' L,1la"4`L'll L,eL IIILII?"::llll If'�'Ilt'; ly 14'll�llilll IIIA - 11 'oI.),'•ticd Rny,L1 i1 -h VLLY IIl=CPQ-',:IIL)11, 3 I I I Fi.AR chOUld I11L]LIJC a phasing plan a111d the transportation improvements of each 1'l IL-: t• I i'_i tills ujij riclude the food Inyout atici cil-c L.I.-II-1i �L: %% Chin thc prolcce t{:yr c,—Ldi 1.11;I�L, € lR `"_11.1 L1_tI pry+'. i1_L 1L.1 1'.11111 eAi.,I! 111:'_1'. I. �J'li 411 1111 ":-, C1.1.01 1�: dill, 41f1�-I' tc 'L Illi € NR 11),111`il 1111: °1.I1!a' .1;1 1.'tilll`.:..11. [11 !." F IItiII iraffic an PIA - I I W' I [DOT requests a design sel'11, `k Of"(? 9«l firm die existing Queen Kaahumanu II;�'1.','.Iw ri I1[ -{}I- Silk Jill- Il-flUli'rrla�€'L 1�' ll7llal[11C111'i1t5. " ] IiL 11:'111'1?41,1'1' t4I71I 1'� X17(111711 I1�ILL;it�l"1', 1.11 II)c TIAR Lo 11l'9t Incl do the €)roposcd left tUi'ii I;1ric rani Iav,,. rclr the €tc :,.1.. i .d,l; €Zoadwa}°_ '1 ]iciv Is also no mention of 4;I1Li lnclL/.r11Ir111„ ;1 €;,Lill:, ov it It S?I1 Ila%C Ally illlt:tillS'71ti- 71t';I ,' C0111,1t'i ,Icv)!1 I I11 Phil"1t11L1ir I ll!Aiiee1', I`11, -do ',rl ti 01411s11111. IiI,-Ulll;l� L4r:l?It'i .1! 1 1.1�� l...-;`i;Ti{i ,,r r3�r , L1::!;I LII 4 ` Ie ':iEZ.Lilll"iI "111 flctlll [� ]laGv t.i i. 11.1', . I"1°til e r. l:'r"4"]14:t 1IIG rea'i� nulllber P 020-120. Sincerely, /t`� 1111' I�1 '.. D,IkvI..r "I)f I iLLIc^•I'LI!a;:1-11!1 DAVID Y. IGEJADE T. BUTAY »'.] GUVERR ~ '- DIRECTOR STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 869 PUNCHBOWL STREET HONOLULU, HAWAII 96813.5097 August 17, 2022 Y[A EMAIL: planning Chawaiicounty.gov Mr. Zendo Kern Director Planning Department County of Hawaii 101 Pauahi Strect, Suite 3 Hilo, Ha`%,aii 96720 Dear Mr. Kern: Attention-. Ms. Christian Kay Suhpect Change of Zoning Amendment (PL-REZ-2022-000033) and Change of Zoning Ordinance No. 02-131 Kona Thrce LLC Queen Kaahumanu Highway (,State Route t 1) Tax Map Key No: (3) 7-6-021: 016 and 017 — North Kona. Ha wail' Deputy dlrsevs RO$$ M MIGASHI EIXNIFLCO P AANGLALLAN E01111INH SNI:FEN IN REPLY REFER TO: DIR 0680 HWY-PS 2-9354 Thant: you for your letter dated July 12, 2022, and for the opportunity to review a request for an amendment to the Change of Zoning. The project .vas approved under Hawaii County Ordinance No. 02-131 in November 2003 to allow the proposed residential subdivision to he developed in multiple increments. The subject project was acquired by the Applicant in 2015 from the previous owner to develop the remaining portion of the 68,8 -acre site comprising of 450 multi -family rental and sale units. The Applicant's request to amend the ordinance conditions of the following: to allow a 10 -year time extension for the completion of Phase 1 construction and amend Condition N related to road dedication_ The primacy access For Phase 1 is proposed on Queen Kaahumanu Highway (State Route 11), approximately 600 feet north of the intersection with Kuakini Highway. Mr. Zendo Kern August 17, 2022 Page 2 I-INVY-PS 2.9354 The Rawaii Department of Transportation (HDOT) has the following continents: The HDOT does not object to the amendment requests, to allow a 10 -year time extension related to Condition I and road dedication requirements under Condition N. 2. 174'e have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis Report, dated May 2020, included in the Draft Environmental Assessment, and have provided cornments on our letter dated September 3, 2020 (HWY-PS 2.3918 attached), which remain applicable. We request that a condition be included that the Applicant shall coordinate with HDOT on any mitigation measures, including any pro -rata contributions, related to the state highway that may be required. We recommend a 10 -year development schedule showing the phases, number of units, and the associated transportawm improvements to be completed before occupancy of each phase. 4. Drainage improvements affecting drainage structures on state highN�rays shall be submitted to the Highways Division, Design Branch. Hydraulic Design Section for review and approval. State highway improvements required from this development shall be at no cost to the State and conform to current Federal and State design standards, including the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction as amended. If you have any questions, please contact Jeyan Thirugnanam, Systems Planning Engineer, Highways Division, Planning Branch at (808) 587-6336 or by email at Jeyan.'Chirugnanamra;hawaii.gov. Please reference file review number PS 2022-129. Sincerely, JADE T. BUTAY Director of Transportation Attachment PJ:",HP1-l1 I ILU W 101 "A.Wd 01.11101 — V. r DEPARTMF h II if I '1tif 1 -N.M) \A VIRAL RESOURCES 111[Ni?I ' 11'. ]]AWAI196B13 August 1, 2022 TO: RUSSELL Y. TSUJI, Land Administrator Land Division FROM: LAFNIE BERRY, Wildlife Program Manager Division of Forestry and Wildlife `+T7 A'%'NT. D. CASE I.11AIR'P4�^4ilA' _.ShL .vLL tiA7C71x1 IL4Y_T.{E.5 . ..i. WA MFOL -Ri E:1C4u.fE.AdL4T V'IFFRT1i 4AII F:1 M. X.;I I I 11rttil'EL 111:.1.. .,. 'A'47FA 4S SEX'tiA 11- 1:r.r.: Rffifi L%IE41 i-OHL'I,..1. IIIU'iiE. 9 %PORK PALSEK ,tIKC ICAli!DmiE}SLAY]} F=17 cu'LIGFI'o% ...h\j] STSP. £AKK og no. 3 74 9 SUBJECT: Division of Forestry and Wildlife Comments for the change or Zone Amendment Application from the County of Hawai`i on behalf of Kona Three. LLC for the Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project on liawai`i Island The Depaltnlent of Land and Natural Resources, Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DCOFAy V) ]las received your rcq] icst for comments for the Change of Zonc Amcndmcnt Application (No_ PL- REZ-2022-0040_i 1 to ant end the Change Zone of Ordinance No. 02-131 (REZ 470) regarding MID properties located in Hol ualoa, North Kana, on the island of Hawaii; TM .s: (3) 7-6-'021: 016 and 7-6-021: 017. 1he proposed prujecf consists ofreclues(lau a 10 -year time extension to comply with Condition 1(Complete Construction of Phase I) and to amend Condition N (Roadway Dedication) with dhe purpose of seclining final plan approval and completion of a 450 -trait multiple -family rental ,:incl sale housing project. The Royal 'Vistas prcaject will be developed in a cluster of two and three-story buildings throughout the 68.837 -acre that Compromise both parcels, which will also include roadway development, drainage improvements. and installation of utilities and services. DCIFAW concurs with the mitigation measures included in the Roval Vistas Housing Project Environmental Assessment (attached in the application package) intended to avoid construction and operational impacts to State -listed species including the Hawaiian Hoary bat or `Ope`ape'a (Lasrrrrus cinerens semorris), Hawaiian Hawk or `lo (Br► eo saidarins), Blackburn's Sphinx Moth (Manduc•a h1ackburrrr), and seabirds. For illustrations and guidance related to seabird -friendly light styles that also protect the dark, starry skies of Hawaii please visit littps:,I/dlnr.hawaii.gov/wildlifelfiles/2016/03/ Q0C439.pdf. We also appreciate the Measures outlined to minimize the spread of invaisive species and the use of native plant species for landscaping. DOFAW provides the following additional comments regarding the potential for the proposed work to affect listed species in die vicinity of the project area - The State listed Hawaiian Crcousc or N&O (Brant) scllrrcA ce nsiw) could potentially occur in the vicinity of the proposed project site_ It is against State law to harm or harass these species. If any Planning Dept. Exhibit 12 are present during co[lstruction, then all activities within 100 feet (30 meters) should cease, and the bird or birds should neat be approached. Fork may continue after the bird or birds leave the area of their own accord. If a nest is discovered at any point, please contact the Hawaii Island Branch DOFAUi' Office at (808) 9774-42:1. DOFAW is concerned about attracting vulnerable birds to areas that may Bost nonnative predators such as cats, rodents, and mongooses- Additionally, the developrneat of a park is likely to increase the number of users and may generate more trash We recommend taking action to minimize predator presence; remove cats, place bait stations for rodents and mongoose, and provide covered trash receptacles_ Due to the arid climate and risks of wildfire to listed species. we reconimend coardinating with the Hawaii Wildfire Management Organization at (808) 850-%)0 Lir adnlinCDhawaiiw•ildfire.org. on how wildfire prevention can be addressed in the project area, We appreciate your efforts to work with our office for the conservation of our native species. These comments are general guidelines and should stat be considered comprehertsive for this site or project. It is the responsibility of the applicant to do their own due diligence to ati 4aid arty negative environmental impacts" Should the scope of the project change significatrtly, or should it become apparent that threatened or endangered species may be impacted- please contact our staff as soon as possible. If you have any question-,, please contact Paul Radley, Protected Spccics Habitat Conservation Flanning Coordinator at (908) 295-1123 or I)aLlI.n1-["ad ey-:Ilaw aii-gu Sincerely. LAINIE BERRY Wildlife Program Manager V.kvID Y- IGL t E,M-E--F F_'.'h'.%II 0Qtobcr 15.2021 STATF. OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESMRC'ES SIATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION DIVISION I AKU L11LLWA 13L1LLHh'i.r [,II I ICL -Mf OKI Ii LV 1). 'ti ll: = 5; ICAP01.1.1.1IAti All 1K,707 LelldU KL]Irk. Plait3jit]0 L}irecic3r County of Ha wai'i, Plattnlni�'- Dcp.,rlmctil It71 Pataahi S1rCwt, Sllilc 3 Hilo_ Hawaii 96720 Planning(ri:h,lu'•aIICotHIT pV Dcar Zcndo Kcni: ,1'71 NNE IY., L,F. ^-IJ.Lr.L i,F LrX:: r'1. ' 1.'.J -r- ftr;7-'N: LS �C,'.'I'FVCF—WATa 7- � LS C_. TinRF.RT K til AT D3 Fih,l . -k 1? M. h.iLEO RAM F.I. 11 4.1 1' 1: II! . u } 11 IL i.+?il YY1L.Y ��\'dhli <k .,1 <41 • 5�hi- �:I.• {Y:J <� •II•}ti •r'!}kl vv�<,'il \I iM!.11•I .'I .I S.JTJi-,USL6.'..11lL'T� r:AH.'1111. A'��' Iti ":7: 3i 4r 6'.1 f atil i �I •.1: Tei RF'PT.Y R- FFR TO: Prop;[ No. 2020PR32834 Submission No. 202(;?R:,2x,14.0o5 Doc_ No. 211 ONS' O Archaeoloty SUBJECT: Chaptur 6E-42 Historic Preserx ati4n Ruir-r4• — Count. of Haitiai'i Change of Zone Application, REZ.4711, Ord. Na. 02-131, RN -1-5 Zonud Land Kuno Threc, LLC Htilualim Ppiperty Archaeological Inventor,, Survey Holualoa Ahupua°a, forth Kona District, Nand of Haj ai'i TMX: ( 3) 7-6-621.0164119 ThLs letter provides ilic State Historic Prescrv[ttioa Division's (SHPD+s) rcN cr. of a request to amend Rcronc Ordnance No. 02-131 and the supporting, draft report 01cd.IPI-eWr,J_t' SPrI-el' Ri- rorl /ur .76121 Ac•rc,; Lewrat%i in IT+3lrrtrrr,rr 1+� -t ��r arrr'rr, .�;� r1t lCr�ucx T}r. �rrc:r. Ifrr,l�ri'� I.c1c�r�cJ, I cx,rrti'r fTi h: I?1 %-b-t1�} 1I}h- 019] (Fscoll and Fsco[[. Atiotlst 2f121)• Table 1 summari/cs The stkbmi(tals mccivcd far the subject project. Date Received Projut No. or S ti 1) m i my inim No. Materials Reccivud N-Iarch 3. 2021 2020832 34 (P rex iortsly Log No- 2(1211011727) Ori{emit 5ubmilt,ll "i1h Draft Al Moy 7, 2021 2€120PR32 34.002 S1HP Req (Test Fimn Mali 12, 2021 2€120PR32834,003 Rc),jscd AIS I and Respcnsc July 28, 2021 2020832 34.004 Revised AIS 2 and Rcs po nsc Oelobcr 11, 2021 2€120PR32 34.005 Rcviscd AIS ;turd Res 3Ttsc Scientific Cc3ustT]Irknl Smices, Inc. [S[+S) cc3mpleled t1Te Al; <3f aplln)xiu]ately ?[,_ 121 :kcreti al tike recltleSl <3f the applicant, Kom Thrce. LLC and Rich{ud Wlicelock (owwr), and in response Io a I I P D Iclter dated July 30, 2020 (Log No. 201 -01)979, Doc. No- 180 --- SNO I). The Iandou.ncr plans to apply for a C otin iv of Ha wati4i grabbing and grading pennit in support of proposcd devclopmcnt of the proper y. PetiMcm SHPD Corresporldcncc: 20183 In a ]QUr dated May +1, 2018 (Log No. 2018.01123, Doc. No. 1805SNU51. SIIPD arccptcd the AT& complcted for a �.f1-acre porlion of tltc oycrall proicct area and wgccd Ic miliniiion com1111mmits In the foml of [m archacological prescrvmiou plan (PP) for Site 50-10-17-10512, a bttrirkl irr`ahucut plat (13`1 R) for 4itc 741 I{)-}? 31}5413, autd -.11� arc]utcc3loL�ical [uonilcaritt24 Irl,ktt (AMP) for the proposed devclopmcnt. 201 Rb In a leper dated July Y), 20 1", (Log No. 2101 5.008118, Doc. No. I �075N0I ), SHPD rcvick�ed and had no obJeclion to a rxgncst lc> aimcod E~<crt m €)rdnartcc No- 02-131. AddiliDtrklly, SHPD slipulaied Ilic following needed ro be complcicd prior to issuatncc of auraper1171ts: Burial Trcatntc171 Plan for S i i c » 50 -10 -3? -30503: 2, Presen,alionPlan ibrSiie�,50-10-37-3115(12: Planning Dept. Exhibit 13 lcndo Kcm October 15. 2021 Pa -e 3. Arc hacolo gical Moniiorim; Plan for the portion of the 5 -acre Alli projcct arca in proximity to Siles # 50.10.3? -3051}? and � 50-10.17.3[1,593: 4. Verificaliou of ins(illation of inlcrim prolcction nacasLlrC5 around Sitcs � 50-13)-37-33155)2 arld 50-10-37-310593_ ,lied 5. Completion of an AIS for the 63.8 -acre portion of the project ;kua TMIhin the. boundaries of the Hatturl 111 cl al. (] 992) surti'M Dur records indicaltC Iha1 1110 Hatlitnalt el til. (1992) &uric►: report wkas never revised {and {accepted tend does no[ meet current H A R § 13-276-5 standards for arc Imco lo a ic al inti cit€on, survcys. The MS for €hc 03. -.acre poilioa deeds to include a 1.01P,"j pedestrian 511n•cy. identification and updated documentation of all archacoloigical historic properties present. an asscssmenl of their imcgrily and site si nifiC,111CC PUt-,W111I to H A R I 2}S4-6, C'ri[cria a -c. as well as rile plans ]or each site. including silt bmindarics and arcus impauled by bulldcarim,. and P1mmLIrrkphs cif all wiles acid fealklres. Lastly, SH12D requewled like sciccicd .archdcolo-ic.il film consult a 4th SHPD prior to inili.ition of the AIS rco ardiia" propowd documcntation stratcf*y- 20=0a Tn a letter dated October 30, 20270 (T.og 1+o. 1-62iDD1241. Doc. No. 2010W09), SHPD rcviewed Ills plan Iiticil, .1n Archtocolovi al !'fern Jr,r ,5' c t 50-10-S7-305IJ7 Locukd hi 11ij1rrrll(x� l-'•1f+r im a'a.: 'r,rrlr # oow 1)oarwi, f 7'.WK. r.3.a .7-6-021:016-00? (Escott and McIlo. Mak 2020). SHPD sliptiltiled the following needed to be completed prior to submittal and acccpLallcc of a rev iscd IT SHPD .Icceplauce of IIic draft Escott xlid Escott (2020) AIS for ills 63.5 -acre pcmiolL of Ilse project �irea and incorporation of any ;IBreed-upon prtser',-aiion sites or p011i0ri5 of silts info the revised PP- Note for example that. Site X50 -10-37-O' 0592 occurs in bosh L]le 63.8 -acre aiad 5.0 -acre potlions of the overall project area: 2. Insertion into the PP of text and permit plans detailing the ]oration and extent of the proposed breach of Site i+ 50-111-37.30592- 3. A permit applicalion for the breach work and a SHPD HRS 6E Submittal Form for Ilre project; aIad 4. Address the revisions specified in the Attachincm. 20201) In 1 letter cicitcd Novctaabcr 141, 2i}21) ]:Lag No. 2t)2f].11()72 , Doc. No 201 I NM04)- SHPD requesiccl reg isions to tllt Escott and Escott (March 202 0) AIS report, Previolis archaeological staldics'.Vithin the project arca consist of recolinaissancc survey (Hammwt and Folk 1993) mid Iwo AIS f HGiiL inaII c1 til. ] 9K4-' Htnt mall ei al. ] 992) conducted in TVI K7-6-(lL 1:C ] 6 rind 01". told a Clcld inspeclion ol'ihe cinYeiil project .area (Fscot( 2€}10). `SHPD did riot autpi Ilie Ham in all t[ al. (1984) A I 5 as i€ did npI nleeL the standards (Autust 25, 1992, Log No_ 6174, Dot_ No_ 3524c_ raid October 5. 1392, Loi, No_ 6482_ Doc_ No_ 3542c). The AIS identified 21 archaeological sites inside the current pr iect arca: Silcs 50-11}-37-10011, 50-10-37- 10012, 50-10-37-10013, 50-10-37-10015. 5{)-1€]-3i-]t7€]l7, 50-10-37-10018, 50-10-37-10019. 50-10-37-10020, 50- W-17-10031. 50-111-17-1011;?, 511.11}-37.111834. 58.10-17.180451, 50- I ()-37- l ll()f�; , 50-10-37-10116X: 50-10-37- 10069. 5€1 I{a_.;?-I{}[)?[} {}-til-�' I{){}7l. 511 1€} .;?-iii{]72, %-I{}-17-if}[173. 50-10-37-10074. and 50-10-17-1007 and Mu bulldozed rlaudenl plrultilig terraces. 11 Le Lo La] project area �t-as 174 acres u17 whicIL 66.039 .acres are withill the current ovcrall prgject arca. Site 1tu112 consisird of two burials that were reinlcmr d outside the project arca. ExQav4 ktcd sites in the current projcct ,arca included Sitcs 1001 t, 100t2, 10013, 100t9, 10067, ] i7{7h#�, 1 f7{} 0 ] 17[) t{p I0071 10073, and 1H}fa74, No Cor'r'Cspoadcnce associated with. tlae Har kimitt ct al. (1992) projcct was located during prcp.arati011 of this ncvICW M such, it i5 alnknown at this time whether l Iammtitt et a]_ 199 2) asw,ascd the archaeological sites far significancc, .and 4a'hmhcr rccommcndaIians NN laude regarding which sites werc adcqualcIy docLin cmcd, requiring no further work, and which retained potenlial lbr furilier documenkiiian through mitig{pion including arcliaeological nroliiiorilig or presenmlion. Hainmatt and `�hideler (2.411)?} subiiiiiied addilioik3] slle docullkeliblion in the fonik of a lever to SHPD for Sites 10011, 117012, l[aU.+l. 111ta49 wild 10071. Site maps tu7cl plaotograplls 11'L'ce 1701 provided for' all sins, SCS conducted lin .archaeologictal field inspcclion (Fscoll 2016) of the current project -wu to rcloctlic Ilic sites idenlified diihn- [lie Hanumill vi .II_ (1992) A1q, it) assess illeir current condiliott .incl [he adequacy of the Hailunaat lcndo Kcm October 15, 2021 Pa"e 3 ct a1_ dociiincnration, Tho field inspection did not inc hide complctin , new doctunenttttion in the fon11 of drawing site maps or Inking plioiogniphs of sites wltcre sLLch documcmt ii ion was not recorded by Ht9171mmI ci �i1. (193 ), aIIhot agh sucli docol-licIII 0ttion i5 req ttired t0 nree( the minimtLm AIS Standards as delined in H A R § 11-276. The CLLYrent AIS (Escott and Escott. August 2021) ntdac'ale5 that the project arca %vas bulldozed Cor cocauncrcial ;agricttlrilre in the I') fj5. ConSult;ation occtrrncd with C reg g Kashnva who was the propcm man;agQT- for parecls 010 and 017 in the 19ROs. Kash iutt iiidiertted the project arca t' as ahvLidv bLLI[do rcd all that tiinC but "'aS fmi11iir wit It the historic fctatures on the propertu. SCS also contacted Shane Nelson. an Office of H;auaiian All�air5 (ORA) representaIive, bll[ reoeived Ito response. The ficldivork oomponont of the Escott and Escort (Augilst 2021) AIS was oondrtetcd thrmrghotlt 2020, The pro .icct included a l0O".f surface stirvc� with site recordation. GPS, pllotogmph,v, and subsorfatee excavation with documenizifio r. A katal of 16 sites acrd cane is!>latrad find (lr €) erre identified durinL the A14 ('Irtble l). 'Iuc> wiles and is pc'Ii-oaIvph (SLic 50-J(j- Y7-3€ 181, Sile 5(j-€0-: 7-.1J IH2. and 50-I1j-37-31254) mere ncwly identified and Ilio rcm>liinin4' foniucn silos were prcviouslt n documcntcd (IImili ;all el al- 19921- Fivc pi—Motisly idcntiked silos were dctcmaincd no lon,= present (Site 50-M-.57-10112, Site 50-10-37-10017 Site 50-H)-3?-l0(M, Site 50-10-37- 10049, and Site 50-1(}-.;7-10071). Site 50-10-37-€t)G1 a %%as del emlilied io be a modern bulldo,,cr road segment and lhcreforc: it is ito[ ,arc archaeological silo. lite S i I c 50-10-�;-10012 bnriaal (MN1 —2), atlmgP w i l I i IIiv entirety of Itic bLirial crypt and .ill associated features_ 11`e[C d[sln(cmd during the Hanimaii ei al. (1992) ptojecl lend rcilitcrced vulsidc ahc project arca in 1993- The r6merincnt was c'ondirvcd in constillralion with ilio liawai`i Island Burial Council ;md Mare Smith from SHPD. A letter dated February 9- 1093- from Grct0 iia€hlw4 l (C'LLlturatl Surtcys Htaw ai'i, inc,) to SHPD, protides additional details re�tlyding the buritkl site. Site 50-10-37-16021} and Site 50-10-37- 10034 %vcre deterinilied to be na at ural vcoloicaI feat iLre&- The sties L[ICIuiIC pt'C-Coll IaIC1 to past-C'oluaact ctulosures- platfonus. mounds. lana ILibcs. calls. a railroad bcmi. acid complexes. Two silos (Site 50-10-3 7-10 01 1 and Site 50- 10-#7-1(x07;) iacrc e.xcm;aated during IIic current ATS. frihkrI- Arehrmr ilrgif- 1,sireslfix-amuwteddjwhii=ihe,c-mrvcrm.1fS'- SIHP # 50-1 G-28 Site Description Function TemparA Ak%(wiatinn Significance Mitig:ttilm -WOI I Plallpru A riculttlr,tl Clettrinp Pre-Cornlaci d NF%V -J0()J2 Former Burial Platform Burial Pit -collum No Ionacr 5ignl scan( NPAI -100IJ Enclosure and Lasa Tube Habitation Pre -Contact d NFW -10018 enclosure Remnant A 6culture HisLoric d N1�ah' -101019 Rock Mounds A griculitiral Clcarilig Historic d NFW -10031 Dnclosucc Wall AtLric'ultutc Historic d NFW -10067 Terraces Habitation Pre-Con(act d N1 -;)A' -10068 Enclostn-e. Ilabilalion Pre-Comact d NFW -10069 modifi.Cd Bluff.'Platfonn Habitation Historic d NFW -10070 U-shaped Enclosure Agriculture Historic d N1 )A' -10072 C'orll 1cx Agricultural C`lcarin g Pre -Contact d NFW -100+? Complex Historic d NFW -10074 Enclosure Coffee Work Sheri Historic d N1 )A' -10075 Enclostn-e. Pig Pcn Historic d NFW -30592 Railroad 3crin Tfallsportation Historic a, c. d P -31181 Lnclosure Coffee Work Shed Historic d N1 )A' -311ti2 Rock Walls Ranching and Ac, culturc Historic d NFW -31254 pcmglyph Marker Pre -Contact d. c P "No Further Work (NFW). Pteservation (P) Tlie I`t sitcs;.•cre assessed as SILmirLmni under Haft X13 -2x4 -r, Criterion d. Sitc 50-10-37 -305 2. the railroad berm. was :also :assessed as 5igni15cant under Criteria a sand c Eand was recommended Ipr preservation. Site 5 0-1 0-37-31254. a pelraglph, was also assessed as significant under Criterion e and was recommended for preservation. Site 50-€0- w7-100112 its a fonner bliri;l1 site ..hcrQ the disposition (bjiriwtl and at5so0atcd burial crypt and fctatures) wcrc rclocaled. Thus. lhcrc arG no known human skeletal rcmnins left_ Nevertheless, iI is rccort mcndcd lhat this former lcndo Kcm October 15, 2021 Paye 4 burial site be flaggcd for prcesnation in the farm of avoidance. The previous site location w i I I be monitored if con slMCI ioil actiritIcs occ tit near Ihat location. The reporl recommends no further historic prescrraIion stork for the rcmaining siIcs. SHPD a-rccs with the site IIitc-ri(y and siLnificaacc assesslnems for all l � sites. SHPD's project C)'fL'L't delenriination is '"Effect, with ageed upon mitigation commitrnms and S11PD alaccs that the 10 sties rccotm mdcd for no furihcr work have been adcquatcly docummiled. SHPD agecs wlih the presena ion of Si1cs 50-10-37-1[15'}2 find 5i}-1ti-t X125 and additional miiig.ntion in the ibrm of archaeological iiyoniiarine, during initial 0mIiiid disttlrh,trice for ttie eiilire pn]jecI Brea. The Escott and Escott (Ali,,tist 20' l) AIS report Adresscs the concerns raised in mir e,lrlicr correspondence am satishcs the req Wi-c tcn[s of HAP �1 -21-6-5 , It i% accepted. PIe[ise send two hard copies of the dacllnient, cicnrly 111arked FINAL. altnkg, nitli a text-woarcIuibIc PDI~ copy of IIto docunacIii al Id a Capy of IItis ,lcceplaIIcc 1L:IICr to iIic Knpolci SHPD oMcc, attention SHPD LjbrNry. AddItionialIy. please tiplond a text-scalchable PDP .cislon of Illc documoni lo II[CRIS Projcci No_ 20201132w34 using the Projccl upplemcnl option and send a text-scarchAble PDF copy of the AiS report to ]chug_k.sa�lres'r� haaii.ao _ SHPD requests t}ic foIlowi1Lg be wllbliii Iied for SHPD rev ic-w alid acc€:ptai icu prior to pen llIii iss11,1iict:: I, An archaeological moniiaring plan (Al --T) for all initial .round disturbing ,ivjvidcs chat meets illc rcgiiiremcnts of H A R ;1;_?1)-4: 2. An archacolog.ieal presenva[ion plitn (PP) for 5iie 5t} -10-t7-30502 and Siic 50-10-"t7-: 125=1 ilia( 111cets 111c rcquircmcats of HAA §I' -277 ; and . Wriltcrl and phala raphic dQcumcntalian verifying implcmcrttalion of inicrim protcclion mcastires for Silcs and 50-10-17-11254. PIoase siihrtiii the plaim mid Ihe 11 itL'riiii pmicciioII docIiiticiLl,llimi, -Li Imw, Balli I]ic neighed re4•IL'y Cc as for t]le AMP -mid PP Io HICRIS Projcet No. 2020PR32834 using the Project Sugplrrllctll aptian. SHPD shall notify. the County vLhcn the n11lllmioll plans ars, icccpicd, and the perirril issiumec process nmy proceed. Plcasc conl.ict Nicolc f1_ fs+lcllo. Hisioric Presrrvalion Arclincolo-ism IV, iii for 111iillcfS rcgarding archacoIogicaI ltsaurccs or this 1cIIcr. Aloha, Alan S. Downer. I'1tD Adminisimior, Statc Historic Preservation Division Dcpiiiy Split Historic Prc a:mMon Offieer cc. Glenn Escoll. SCS. € 8escait;dwhoo.rom Richard A.Wlicelocl ritttard.'[tC�SI1yCSLrt8llr_Or� Scan NaIeimaiIc. SHPT), scan,p.naICiIna i1C"J1lawaIi.ROV Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant November 15, 2022 Mr. Jeffrey Darrow Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Mr. Darrow: Response to Agencies' Comments regarding Amendments to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02 131 (PL-REZ-2022-000033) Applicant: Kona Three LLC TMK: (3) 7-6-021: 016 and 017, North Kona, Hawaii This is in response to comments submitted by reviewing agencies and posted in your EPIC system, relating to the above-described action. We appreciate your consideration of the information we have provided when considering your recommendation to the Leeward Planning Commission. STATE AGENCIES 1. State Department of Transportation (memo dated August 17, 2022) Noted that "The HDOT does not object to the amendment requests; to allow a 10 -year time extension related to Condition I and road dedication requirements under Condition N." The Applicant has no objection to the inclusion of a condition that will require the Applicant to coordinate with HDOT on any mitigation measures that may be required, including any pro -rata contributions, related to the state highway improvements directly related to traffic generated by the proposed Royal Vistas residential project. Part of this coordination will include a 10 -year development schedule showing the phases, number of units, and the associated transportation improvements to be completed before occupancy of each phase. In its earlier comments made as a part of the DEA, the HDOT recommended that a hydrologic and hydraulic study be conducted on the proposed changes to the Horseshoe Bend drainageway and its effect upon the existing culverts on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The HDOT notes the proposed Royal Vistas roadway will apparently conflict P.O. BOX 4501, HILO HAWAII 96720 Planning Dept. PHONE: (808) 895-3218 FRAIL: DARYN.ATWCdOUTLOOK.COAI Exhibit 14 Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 2 of 9 November 15, 2022 with and impact these existing drainage culverts. In response, the consulting civil engineering consultant, Dempsey Pacific Inc., acknowledges that the existing highway culvert crossing for Horseshoe Bend does reside partially within the northern side of the existing 120 -foot wide permitted access location for Royal Vista roadway. However, it was noted that the proposed road intersection is planned within the southern portion of the 120 -foot wide permitted access location in order to allow the existing highway culvert crossing to remain in place and not impact the existing drainageway and culver crossing. If necessary, the Royal Vista roadway can be shifted up to 9.6 -feet further south during the final construction plan design, while still remaining within the existing 120 -foot wide permitted access location. The HDOT also noted concern about Phase I access being provided by the proposed Royal Vistas entry roadway directly onto Queen Kaahumanu Highway as a full - intersection along this major arterial, which HDOT expressed is not advisable and recommend consideration of alternative options, which includes connections of "minor connectors" running parallel to the highway within the adjoining Kona Vistas and Pualani Estates subdivisions. Note that HDOT appears to be concerned about Phase I development only being served by Royal Vistas roadway via Queen Kaahumanu Highway. As responded to within the FEA, intervening properties to the north and south of the Royal Vistas project site are not owned by the Applicant and would therefore prohibit the prompt connection of these parallel roadways. The connection of proposed project roadways with Kekuana`oa Place within Kona Vistas subdivision provides the only opportunity for an alternative access point for the project, and whose connection was delayed to Phase II at the urging of the Kona Vistas Homeowners Association, who also encouraged the Royal Vistas roadway entry with Queen Kaahumanu Highway. In response to HDOT concerns, the Applicant will have no objection to connecting its project roadways to Kekuana`oa Place prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancies for any residential unit within the 450 -unit project, thereby distributing vehicular movements between the channelized Royal Vistas roadway and the signalized Lako Street. With the Kekuana`oa Place connection placed upfront prior to occupancy of any residential unit within the project, southbound traffic can access the fully signalized intersection at Lako Street and Queen Kaahumanu Highway, thereby relieving some of the southbound turning movements from the Royal Vistas roadway intersection. In the end, any design considerations for the proposed Royal Vistas roadway and its intersection with the Queen Kaahumanu Highway, including a design setback of 30 feet for future highway improvements, must meet with the approval of the HDOT. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 3 of 9 November 15, 2022 The Applicant acknowledges that drainage improvements affecting drainage structures on state highways shall be submitted to the Highways Division, Design Branch, Hydraulic Design Section for review and approval and that any State highway improvements required from this development shall be at no cost to the State and conform to current Federal and State design standards, including the Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, as amended. 2. State Department of Health (memo dated July 13, 2022) Noted that the State DOH ",,,does not oppose the time extension proposed" as it will connect to the County's sewer system. 3. State Department of Land and Natural Resources (memo dated July 13, 2022) The State Department of Land and Natural Resources—Engineering and Land Divisions had no any comments regarding the requests. The Division of Forestry & Wildlife concurs with the mitigation measures included in the Royal Vistas Housing Project Environmental Assessment that are intended to avoid construction and operational impacts to State -listed species including the Hawaiian Hoary bat or `Ope`ape`a, the Hawaiian Hawk or `Io, the Blackburn' s Sphinx Moth and seabirds. The Applicant will also be observant of the presence of the Hawaiian Goose or Nene anywhere within the project site and if encountered, will cease any construction activities within 100 feet (30 meters), and the bird or birds will not be approached. The Applicant will ensure that work may continue only after the bird or birds leave the area of their own accord. If a nest is discovered at any point, the Hawaii Island Branch DOFAW Office will be contacted immediately. The Applicant will take measures to minimize activities that will attract vulnerable birds to areas that may host nonnative predators such as cats, rodents, and mongooses. Proposed common areas such as the community centers will be managed by the associations to reduce attracting both vulnerable birds and their predators. The Applicant will contact the Hawaii Wildfire Management Organization for guidance on mitigating measures to reduce the risks of wildfires. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 4 of 9 November 15, 2022 COUNTY AGENCIES 1. Department of Public Works -Engineering Division (memo dated October 5, 2022) We note that the Department of Public Works (DPW) has no objection to the request for a time extension to Condition I. We also note that the DPW does not object to the requested amendments to Condition N that seeks to clarify the extent of curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements within the subject properties. Regarding DPW's concerns regarding Royal Vistas roadway not being a continuous linear throughfare between its Queen Kaahumanu Highway entrance and the extension of Kekuana`oa Place and Paulehia Street, the Applicant will explore opportunities to provide this continuous mauka-makai alignment to the extent practical, given topographical and drainage constraints within the project site. The Applicant sees no significant benefit in a continuous thoroughfare versus a segmented alignment. Traffic can still get from Point A to Point B via a segmented alignment, and probably with better speed control versus long, sloping thoroughfares like Lako or Puapua`anui Streets. The creation of these internal road rights-of-way will require subdivision of the subject properties, in coordination with the DPW, so the Applicant anticipates on-going discussion on a final roadway design that will satisfy the County. Specific to Condition Q, the DPW recites failed efforts of the previous landowners in providing drainage facilities recommended in the Drainage Master Plan for the North Kona Flood Control Project. As required by Condition Q, a drainage manager plan must be prepared meeting with the approval of DPW, should the requested time extension be approved. As part of the drainage master plan, the Applicant will coordinate with the Department of Public Works regarding the final design of the improvement projects for the Horseshoe Bend and Holualoa Drainageways. The potential options for addressing improvements to these drainageways that have been previously discussed include: (1) the County's disposal of TMK 7-6-021:018 to the Applicant for use in the drainage improvements; (2) diverting some or all of the Horseshoe Bend flow into the Holualoa Ditch; (3) installation of a retention basin(s) and/or downstream culvert; and (4) leave the drainages in their current configuration with on-site improvements within the existing drainage boundaries. The final design could include one or a combination of these options, or an option to be identified in future coordination with DPW. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 5 of 9 November 15, 2022 2. Department of Public Works -Traffic Division (memo dated September 28, 2022) Comments offered by the Traffic Division highlighted areas within the TIAR that warranted additional clarification, which are summarized below along with the Applicant's response: a. Intersection within the study area, such as Hualalai (N), Hualalai (S), Puapuaanui, Kuakim, and Lako, were selected to address impact, similar to the number studied in similar developments. The outer intersections (Palani, Henry, Kamehameha III) were studied as primary intersections for regional traffic movements. b. The Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Kuakini Highway (Hwy 11) is very congested during the AM and PM peak hours, with Lako Street being the pinch -point. This congestion creates backups at other intersections along this route, such as at Nani Kailua, Seaview Circle, La`aloa, and Kamehameha III Road. Note however, that the 2008 Kona Community Development Plan states, "A series of east -west (mauka- makai) collector roads linking the regional north -south facilities must also be provided for added circulation and to further reduce the reliance upon the regional facilities." This suggests that east -west collectors (Lako Street, Laaloa Avenue, Future "Spine Road" as part of the Pualani Makai development and Nam Kailua Road) would reduce reliance on regional facilities like Hwy 11. Adjustment of traffic signal phasing at Lako Street, combined with widening of Hwy 11 and Lako Street rights-of-way at this intersection (preferably from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road) to accommodate adequate sight distance and protected left turn movements onto the highway from Lako Street will be beneficial, with the State DOT encouraged to pursue such widening which is essential to any modification of signal phasing at this intersection. d. While the construction of Alii Highway will have some beneficial effect to traffic volumes alone Hwy 11, the Applicant feels that such effect will be limited because there is no good way to get drivers along the Alii Highway back to the Hwy 11 north of the congested area extending from Henry Street to the north and Kamehameha III Road to the south. Overall, the TIAR analyzed the future 2039 traffic conditions with the project and found that "This segment of Route [Hwy] 11 operates at LOS D or better for each condition in the AM and PMpeak hours. The arterial LOS satisfies the County of Hawaii Chapter 25 (Zoning), Article 2 (Administration and Enforcement), Division 4 (Amendments), Section 46 (Concurrency Requirements) regarding `acceptable level of service' for transportation facilities". Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 6 of 9 November 15, 2022 Certain left -bound turning movements at intersections along Hwy I I currently or will operate at LOS E or F at full -buildout, such as at Lako, Kuakini, and Hualalai intersections. However, the satisfaction of a traffic signal does not mean a traffic signal needs to be installed. There are other factors that should be analyzed when installing a traffic signal, such as roadway geometry, added delay to a traffic network, and the impact of rear -end accidents that occur at new traffic signals. Even with certain specific turning movements operating at LOS E or F, the overall function of all intersections along this section of Hwy 11 between Henry Street and Kamehameha III Road operates at acceptable levels of service. The majority of the congestion along this section of Hwy 11 is from northbound traffic from the south during the AM peak hour, with southbound traffic from the north during the PM peak hour. Even with the completion of the project by 2029, all studied unsignalized intersections do not warrant signalization. The most prudent action is to widen this segment of Hwy 11 to better facility through volume and provide opportunities for added turning lanes and signalization, where warranted. This widening is forecast by the 2035 Federal Aid Highways Long Range Transportation Plan and can only be heighted in priority based on need. With regards to concerns about turning movements at the proposed Royal Vistas roadway intersection with the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway that was intended to be the only entrance throughout Phase I, the Applicant is willing to move this up by completing interior project roadways to allow for its connection with Kekuana`oa Place in Kona Vistas prior to the issuance of certificate of occupancy for any residential unit within Phase L This will provide options for left -turn and south -bound movements onto the highway, especially of the State DOT restricts the Royal Vistas roadway intersection to right -in and right -out movements. The end analysis of all of this discussion around traffic is that the project will provide opportunities to move towards the interconnection of subdivisions and partial construction of concurrency roadways as recommended by the Kona Community Development Plan. Even without this project, one can assume that traffic is not going to get any better in the years ahead, especially if people working within North Kona continue to be forced to live outside of the Kona Urban area and commute daily into town. The hopeful solution is to provide the Applicant with the support they need to seek some level of progress on multiple fronts, as Royal Vistas hopes to accomplish by providing partial construction of concurrency roadways while provide mid -market housing opportunities for our residents within the urban center of North Kona. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 7 of 9 November 15, 2022 3. Department of Water Supply (letter dated August 15, 2022) Sufficient water units have already been secured to support the proposed project, with off-site improvements already completed. As recommended by the Department of Water Supply (DWS), the Applicant will construct applicable waster system improvements that will be designed to deliver water at adequate pressure and volume under peak -flow and fire -flow conditions in accordance with DWS rules. The Applicant will ensure that the total allocation of water made available to this project will not be exceeded. As encouraged by the DWS and where feasible, the project would include water efficient fixtures and provide water -saving recommended measures for residents. To minimize water demand, the project would minimize landscaping and use xeriscape landscaping where landscaping is installed. In addition, the project aims to implement and balance xeriscape with the provision of safe and adequate recreational space for residents. The project would utilize reclaimed or reuse water for landscaping, if possible. If deemed necessary by the Department of Water Supply, the Applicant will be amenable to providing total daily water usage calculations, as prepared by a licensed engineer, to be included as part of its plan approval application for the project to ensure that total water usage will not exceed its allocation. 4. Department of Environmental Management (memo dated July 20, 2022) Solid waste generated during the development of the proposed project will be transported to the County's Pu`uanahulu landfill in North Kona. Solid waste subsequently generated by individual unit owners will be handled through commercial haulers or disposal into transfer stations located within the district. Any green waste generated by land clearing activities will be disposed of at the West Hawaii Organics Facilities. The project will connect to the County's sewer system. 5. Police Department (memo dated July 22, 2022) The Applicant acknowledges the response from the Police Department that it does not have any comments at this time. 6. Fire Department (memo dated July 14, 2022) Construction plans for the project will be reviewed by the Fire Department to ensure compliance with Chapter 18 of the Hawaii State Fire Code and Chapter 26 of the Hawaii County Code. All structures and facilities will be constructed in accordance with plans approved by the Fire Department. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 8 of 9 November 15, 2022 PROJECT TIMING The phased implementation of the proposed project with respect to representations made within the Final Environmental Assessment (FEA), the updated traffic impact analysis report (TIAR) and the amendment application foresaw the completion of Phase I by 2024 with the completion of the remainder of the project by 2029. The Draft Environmental Assessment was published in August 2020 with the FEA accepted by the Planning Department more than a year later on September 13, 2021. Based on late comments provided by the County, the Applicant commissioned an update to the TIAR which was produced in late November 2021. The amendment application was subsequently accepted by the Planning Department by letter dated July 12, 2022, anticipating that final action on the amendment request could occur sometime in the Spring 2023. Obviously, completion of Phase I of the Royal Vistas project by the end of 2024 is not practical given where things currently stand in the process, and it appears that should the amendment requests be approved by the County Council in Spring 2023, the likely completion of Phase I is more likely the end of 2027, given the need for design coordination and approval of the subdivision roadways and its connection with the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Kekuana`oa Place as well as its crossing through the Holualoa drainageway, along with drainageway improvements meeting with the approval of the Department of Public Works. Completion of the two phases of Royal Vistas is still anticipated by 2029 as most of the infrastructure design and approval will occur upfront as part of Phase 1. The amendment request for an extension of ten (10) years to complete the first increment of the 450 -unit Royal Vistas project was to provide sufficient leeway given the anticipated complexities and lengthy review and approval processes for the supporting infrastructure associated with this project. To address concerns regarding the completion of Phase II with respect to traffic conditions, the Applicant is supportive of including language within Condition I that removes any reference to phasing and ensures completion of the entire 450 -unit Royal Vistas project by the end of 2029, in alignment with representations made within the FEA and TIAR. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 9 of 9 November 15, 2022 We trust that the aforementioned adequately responds to the comments to date. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant copy via email: Kona Three LLC. Mori, Ashley From: Roberta Durham <roberta.durham9csueastbay_edu} Sent= Monday, July 18, 2022 10-00 Alva To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Change of Zone Amendment Application No_ PL-REZ-2022-000033 As per your request: Request for Comments on App- No_ PL-REZ-2022-000033 (Amend CARD -02-131) on TMKs: (3) 7-6-021:016 & 017 As a home owner in Kana Vistas I abject to the development proposed based on public safety with increased traffic and lack of -infrastructure to support this development Sincerely Roberta Durharn Roberta � Durham RN PhD Profezor Emeritus California State University, East Bay Z ,.... . ...... .._ — ,.,... ....."" -,.. :x Planning Dap;. Exhibit 15 Mori, Ashley From: Douglas Fredebaugh {dfsailor gmail_com> Sent= Tuesday, July 19, 2022 12:35 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: Kana Three LLC Application 02-131 Please stop this poorly conceived and inappropriately sized develop ment from proceeding as planned. The infrastructure is not in place to support development of this nature in this location. Traffic at the Queen K - Lako intersection is already a daily problem, with accidents occurring on a frequent basis as frustrated drivers try to squeeze through_ Although this was originally planned as a high density, moderate incorne development, the lack of public transit, schools, and realistic infrastructure make this a poor choice of locations for such a large development. There is already a problem with flooding during periods of heavy rain_ Without extensive drainage development, more run-off will create massive problems on both the Queen K and the Kuakini Highway. Mahalo, Douglas Fredebaugh Planning Dep;. Exhibit 16 Mori, Ashley From: Joel Gimpel <alohafidlr@a aol.com �, Sent= Sunday, July 31, 2022 2:49 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: bandcculhane@yahoo.corn; debbie511rn@yahoc.com; deewunschelo@yahoo_com; jchorizon@-icloud.com; rckonaron agmail.corn; ricoventeniIla I gmaii.com; Joel Gimpel Subject: Kona Three LLC Requests for Time Extensions - Royal Vistas The Board of Directors of Pualam Estates at Iona, a subdivision of 362 single-family homes several hundred yards north of the proposed Royal Vistas project, hereby strongly objects to the requests for time extensions to secure final plan approval and completion filed by the Applicant, Kona Three LLC, for components of the proposed Royal Vistas project. fork on this porton of the protect, construction of the multi -family residential component that was supposed to have commenced 15 years ago, has never progressed, and the current applicant, who acquired the property nearly seven years ago, now seeks another 1 0 -years to complete that first increment. We believe that the application must be denied for the following reasons 1. The traffic studies submitted by the applicant are woefully inadequate because they were taken during times when the COVID pandemic had caused a significant decrease in visitors and business operations that resulted in greatly reduced traffic an Highway 11. Furthermore, the studies dont adequately account for traffic volume that would result from other proposed developments in the area that are also being considered by the Planning Department_ Nor do applicant's studies acknowledge that the widening of Highway 11 to four lanes, though needed, is neither planned nor funded, and is therefor uncertain for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the current traffic conditicns on Highway 11, which are already well below acceptable standards during the weekday morning and afternoon "rush hours," should prevent developments in the area that would add significantly to traffic on Highway 11. We are also concerned regarding the proposed "Royal Vistas" roadway that would serve as a fully channelized entrance to the subdivision from Highway 11 _ Apparently, this connection would not be signalized, therefore causing additional delays and creating an additional traffic hazard. 2. We remain concerned about the inadequacy of the archaeological studies that purport to support the project because there is much evidence that the property includes features of the HoIuaIoa Slide and rock walls that are mistakenly described as agricultural walls. In addition, only a small percentage of the property has been inspected for archaeological features deserving of preservation_ 3. Although the earlier proposal to access Highway 11 via road extensions through the Gomes property to Ho'omama Street and Paulehia Street in Pualani Estates, which intersect with Puapuaanui Street, had supposedly been dropped, the current application appears to resurrect it as identified under the Kona Community Development Plan. We emphasize that the proposal, if approved, must not be understood to allow a substitute for an appropriate and direct access from Royal Vistas to Highway 11. 4_ The application for the project relies on outdated information regarding the adequacy of public school capacity in the area to accommodate the hundred additional students that would be residing in the first phase of the project when completed. 5_ The application fails to acknowledge the inevitable harm to endangered species, including Hoary Bats, and native flora that would result from the proposed development. Nor does it deal adequately with the water Planning ©epi. Exhibit 17 shortages that have been plaguing the area in recent years, or with the passible effects and mediation or prevention of waterflcw disruptions, including flooding, that could result from alterations to the landscape. 6. Finally, we object to the application because too much time (15 years) has elapsed since this project was first proposed, and 10 years have passed since the first phase was to have been completed. Yet not one brick has been laid_ It's time to go back to the drawing boards_ Mahalo for your kind attention to our concerns and objections.. Mori, Ashley From: Nunberg, Jack <jack.nunberg@a mso.umt.edu> Sent= Wednesday, August 3, 2422 9:53 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: oppose Royal Vista development Dear Planning Commission - As a resident of Pualani Estates, I'd like to echo some of the points raised by our Homeowners' Association in their letter of opposition. • The biggest problem would be the hundreds of extra cars and hundreds of extra trips to the workplace, groceries, etc that would impact not only the already packed Highway 11 corridor but will spillover onto Hoomama and Paulehia Streets in Pualani Estates. These latter streets would be the natural route to get to a traffic signal on Puapuaanui and Highway 11, especially as no traffic signal is proposed for the direct routes from the development onto Highway 11. • This points out that the developers have never in these 10 years issued a workable plan for mitigating the impact of the additional traffic. This is reflective of their larger failure to move on their development plans in the past 10 years, necessitating the current request for an extension_ The developers don't know what they're doing and are not to be trusted to do a competent job, much less the right thing. Thank you for your consideration, Jack Nunberg 15-647 Opikanalani PI Kailua Kona, HI 96740 406-544-9413 Planning Dept. Exhibit 18 Mori, Ashley From: Marta <martafinleyyahoo.com} Sent= Thursday, August A, 2022 7:25 A To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Royal Vistas Development In regards to the Kona Vistas Development, Zone Ordinance 02 131, 7MK {3) 7-6.021:016 and 017., in my opinion, it is a bad idea. The congestion in that area is already terrible in the mornings and afternoons. The roads are notable to handle hundreds of more cars. In addition, we do not need vacation rentals. That is what hotels are for. During this last COVIo wave, we saw affordable housing disappear. I know several people who listed their homes for sale and all were bought out of state buyers who will be part time residents taking homes and rentals off the market. We do not need more investors to rent out places to tourists. We need homes and rentals that our young locals can afford. So, until we have better infrastructure in place and affordable housing is built for our fireman, teachers, nurses, lifeguards, electricians, plumbers, etc., we do not need this big development nor any 10 year extension. Building projects should enhance our community. We need to get away from catering to the wealthy out of state people and look to what will keep our children and their families frorn moving away. Thank you for listening. Marta Finley Retired Teacher Sent from my iPhone Planning Dep;. Exhibit 19 Mori, Ashley From: Mike Jorgensen <mjorgensen tsaloans.net> Sent= Thursday, August A, 2022 5:19 A To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: FW: REF: Change of Zane Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 - Amendment to Change of Zane Ordinance No. 02-131 Dear S;rs, Afte}, Fur Lh.c}, dulibeicaLi(�ri, i Hereby Rescind my Opposition as stated beIow and remain NEUTRAL, with regard to the develapment. Sincerely, Mike Jorgensen 76-6388 Kilohana St. Kailua Kona, Hf Frorn: MlkeJorgensen Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2022 9:10 AM To: planning@hawaiicounty.gov Subject- REF: Change of Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000433 - Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02-131 Dear Sirs, In November 2018 a meeting of owners of Dona Vistas Subdivision was conducted to inform owners of the soon to be proposed project on our north boundary which would be accessed directly through our subdivision. As anticipated, in early December the developer with his spokesman, Zendo Kerns, (who is now the HAWAII COUNTY PLANNING DIRECTOR) Meld a meeting at the Rec center to outline their project consisting of 450 "market rate" units which would be 2 and 3 story multi -unlit condominiums. These structures would be 200 feet by 200 feet square and could be over 40 feet tall blacking views. They are proposing Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR- page 46) which will add noise and traffic, multi -family rentals, loud parties, Not family-oriented. After receiving feedback from the owners who had packed the Rec center then and again at the December 17,2018 special homeowners' meeting which was so well attended that the group exceeded the capacity of the Associa meeting room, the Board voted 7 to 0 to appose the development as planned. The Board then hired a land use attorney to help with this Planning Dept. Exhibit 20 project. Funds to oppose the development were already in a special HOA fund. During the Developer's first application process our land use attorney as well as many homeowners in the area wrote in opposition to the development as planned. The application was denied. Now a new (10 Year) application has been submitted and is about to be heard by the county. Hawaiian Properties, our management company should have sent every owner a link to the application. Among those who have seen it, it has generated many questions about what is being proposed/changed in this iteration. Simply put, the only change from this developer's past applications is that the development will now have some connection to the highway, which was required anyway, however, the number of buildings or size is UNCHANGED. Sadly, they still plan to come through our subdivision using Kekuanaoa Place for entry and exit. Additionally, they have also provided a stub out for a future connection to Leilani. As a result, both of these 2 roadways will experience significant noise and traffic impact, as will all of our streets. There is no mention of a HDA or CC&Rrs to protect anyone. The connection on Kekuanaoa Place will be dangerous because of the increasing street grade approaching Lako. The tura-in coming from Lako is almost blind. The steep grade combined with driveways in very close proximity to the intersection is crazy. Missing are the curbs, gutters, and sidewalks that have yet to be installed. Parking on the street would be hazardous for all traffic. Cars and trucks will be detouring to all the other streets in that area to avoid the hill. IN ADDITION, THE 274 "FDR SALE" UNITS ARE PROPOSED AS SHORT TERM VACATION RENTALS. Some people were led to believe the project was scaled down in the amount and size- It has not. That Is decidedly Not True. If you read the last part (after the table of content) Part 2, pages IS, 16, and 17, No Alternative from originally Proposed! They can't make as much money ! Because the developer has already paid for 450 water meters, they will be going for the full proposed project, 450 units, 2 and 3 stories tall- 40 feet. z I wish to voice mfr Opposition with regard to this new development project! Mike Jorgensen 76-6388 Kilohana St, Kailua Kona, HI Sent from Mail for Windows Mori, Ashley From: Janice Derr <jkkona r,Si hau+aiiantel.net> Sent= Thursday, August 4, 2022 5:47 P To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Kana Three, LLC Amendment Application and Amendment to Change Zoning for Royal Vistas Development Attachments: Kana Three LLC Royal Vistas,dacx DATE: August 4, 2022 TO: County of Hawaii Planning Department CC: Hawaii County Council Members FROM. Janice Kerr 76-4320 Leilani St. Kailua-Kona. HI 96740 Ikkona0hawaiiantel, net SUBJECT, Change of Zone Arnendr rent Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02-131 Applicant: Kona Three, LLC Request: 10 -year Time Extension to Comply with Condition (Complete Construction of Construction of Phase 1) and Amendment to Condition IN (Roadway Dedication) Tax Map Keys: (3) 7-6-021:016 and 0171 N. Kona, Hawaii In 2018 Zendo Kern, the paid Consultant far the Developers of "Royal Vistas", made a pitch to the homeowners in Kana Vistas, which is the subdivision adjacent to his proposed project. He attempted to "sell the idea" by covering up the damage that his f=irm would do to an entire Ecosystem, by grubbing the land of all trees and vegetation, so he and his partners could build 450 high-density, high-rise housing units in the flood plain on the northern border of Kona Vistas, Planning Dep;. Exhibit Fast forward to 2022: tendo Kern is now the Director of the Planning Department for the County cf HawaiT He has authority to approve the renewed Application for this project to ba b ilt. Any "conflict of interest' concerns here? {None, according to Mayor Mitch Roth.) There are many reasons for this project to be disallowed. First of all, Zendo Kern's involvement. Second, a lot has changed in the 38 years since this project was originally approved in 1984 for the former landowners. The Zoning is no longer "law -density". Additional reasons, too voluminous to detail completely, are summarized below: The volume of traffic on Hwy 11, is more than just a nuisance. It creates life-threatening gridlock for Police, Fire and Medical Emergency vehicles, since the alternate routes east and west also clog up absorbing the Hwy overflow. (Remember the recent fire that closed Hwy 11 and Kuakini Hwy? Nowhere to go...) No plans or funding to widen the Hwy. It is a State Huey, not a county road, so the State dictates any improvements. Water restrictions, shortages, aging water wells. Several additional Developments also planned for this area along Hwy 11 that will pour even more vehicles onto the already crowded road. Access to this project will be through small streets in quiet neighborhoods without sidewalks, or road shoulder markings, or curbs or gutters. Street parking would be dangerous. Children playing, people walking across the street to a neighbors house, or just walking on the street would be dangerous. Flooding (building site is a flood plain), lack of sewer capacity during periods of heavy rainfall (when sewage goes directly into the ocean). Shortage of Doctors, Teachers, and limited access to basic support services. Archaeological preservation ignored_ There is evidence of burials, artifacts, coffee shack, walls of Holualoa Slide, a National trail. and more. Habitat destruction of endangered and threatened species, particularly Hawaiian hawks, owls, bats. and more. No provision proposed for an HOA or any DD&R's to protect the interests of the intended or neighboring residents. Documented Affordable Housing shortage, and there is no provision for affordable housing units as part of this project Developers are also proposing Short Term Vacation Rental Units as part of this project. STVR's add noise, traffic, multi -family rentals of single units, property damage, and more. Such units are not compatible with family-oriented neighborhoods and pride of ownership Please be realistic. At this time, this project would severely diminish the quality of life for thousands of residents_ respectfully request you to appose this Development and possibly reconsider it when we have the roadways and other necessary infrastructure in place. Thank you. [r i7ave also attached this fetter as a fife to this ernad] DATE: August 4, 2022 TO: County of Haai'i Planning Department CC: Hawaii County Council Members FROM: Janice Kerr 76-4320 Leilarri St, Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 lkkon -.� hawaiisntel.net SUBJECT, Change of Zone Amendment Application No. PL-RE2-2022-000033 Amendment to Change of Zone Crdinance No. 02-131 Applicant: Kona Three, LLC Request: 10 -year Time Extension to Comply w1th Condition I (Complete Construction of Construction of Phase I) and Amendment to Condition N (Roadway Dedication) Tax Map Keys: (31 7-6-021:016 and 017; N. Kona, Hawaii In 2018 Zendc Kern, the paid Consultcnt fcr the Developers of "Royal Vistas'', made o pitch to the homeowners in Kona Vistas, which is the subdivision adjacent to his proposed project. He attempted to "sell the idea" by covering up the damage that his firm would do to an entire Ecosystem, by grubbing the land of all trees and vegetation, so he and his partners could build 450 high-density, high-rise hou5ing units in the flood plain on the northern border of Kana Vistas. Fast forward to 2022: Zendo Dern is now the Director of the Planning Department for the County of Hawaii. He has authority to approve the renewed Application for this project to be built. Any "conflict of interest" concerns here (None, according to Mayor Mitch Roth.) There are many reasons for this project to be disallowed. First of all, tendo Kern's involvement. Second, a lot has changed in the 38 years since this project was originally approved in 1984 for the former landowners. The Zoning is no longer "low-density". Additional reoscm, too voluminous to detail completely, are summarized below: The volume of traffic on Hwy 11, is more than just a nuisance. It creates life-threatening gridlcck for Police, Fire and Medical Emergency vehicles, since the alternate routes east and west also clog up absorbing the Hwy overflow, (Remember the recent fire that closed Hwy 11 and Kuaknl Hwy? Nowhere to go,.,) No plans or funding to widen the Hwy. It is a State Hwy, not a county road, so the State dictates any improvements. Water restrictions, shortages, aging water wells. Several additional Developments also planned for this area along Hwy 1 1 that will pour even more vehicles onto the already crowded road. Access to this project will be through small streets in quiet neighborhoods without sidewalks, or road shoulder markings, or curbs or gutters. Street parking would be dangerous. Children playing, people walking across the street to a neighbor's house, or just walking an the street would be dangerous. Flooding (building site is a flood plain), lack of sewer capacity during periods of heavy rainfall (when sewage goes directly into the ocean}. Shortage of Doctors, Teachers, and limited access to basic support services. Archaeological preservation ignored. There is evidence of burials, artifacts, coffee shack, walls of Holualoa Slide, a National trail, and more. Habitat destruction of endangered and threatened species, particularly Hawaiian hawks, awls, bats, and more. No provlslon proposed for an HOA or any CC&R's to protect the interests of the intended or neighboring residents. Documented Affordable Housing shortage, and there is no provision for affordable housing units as part cf this project. Developers are also proposing Short Term Vacation Rental Units as part of this project. STVR's add noise, traffic, multi-family rentals of single units, property damage, and more. Such units are not ccmpctible with family-oriented neighborhoods and pride cf ownership. Please be realistic. At this time, this project would severely diminish the quality of life for thouscinds of residents. I respectfully request you to oppose this Development and possibly reconsider it when we have the roadways and other necessary infrastructure in place. Thank you. Mori, Ashley From: Doug Perrine <perrine@haYvaii_rr_com> Sent= Thursday, August 4, 2022 3:18 P To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Public Comments on Planning Department application Royal Vistas Development, Zone Ordinance 02 131, TIM (3) 7-6-021:016 and 017 Dear Planners: The proposed Royal Vistas Development will add a large amount of new traffic to Queen kaaharnanu j Kuakini Hwy at, and close to, a major bottleneck at the intersection of Lako 5t. and Kuakini Hwy. This intersection is already well past capacity at morning and afternoon rush hours, and becornes a life-threatening blockage during tsunami evacuations. I am not opposed to the development of new housing in this area, but it rnust be preceded by the necessary infrastructure. To accommodate any additional vehicular traffic into this area, Queen K J Kuakini Hwy needs to be widened to four lanes from Henry 5t. to Icing Karnehameha III highway and Royal Poinciana Street needs to he connected to queen Kaaharnanu Hwy_ with a traffic light. Until these projects are completed, no additional residential construction should he green -lighted in this area_ Thank you for considering the safety and convenience of current residents in making your decisions. Doug Perrine 75-223 Haoa 5t Kailua Kana HI 96740 Planning Dep;. Exhibit 22 Mori, Ashley From: Kathy Winter <khkealani gmaitcom} Sent= Thursday, August 4, 2022 10:22 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Against K3 permit - by editors of Pualani Pono and Dr. K H Winter Regarding the application for building „Royal Vistas" south of Pualani Estates: Several things jumped off the pages that might be important to Pualani Estates (PEK) owners and residents. Reading all 1900{ pages is too much for most of us, so here is a list of issuest and the page numbers where the information can be found. Background - the past 38 years: the development planned has been in process as part of the project approved in 1984. County Council has subsequently extended time limits for development, most recently in 2002. In 2015, Kona Three purchased the land from the previous owners who had not commenced building, acquiring the 68.837 acres to build 450 :`multiple family„ units, some "flats" and others "courtyard." Population density: Zoning in 1984 designated much of the project site as "low density" which could include "residential, ancillary ccrnmunity and public uses including convenience -type commercial uses-" p. 30. NOW the site is identified as "medium density", mid -market housing. These would be both for rent and for sale units. The builder acknowledges on p. 11 that "final distribution of these units may be adjusted during the final design_" Think about that - given real estate prices as they are, how many of the units will end up being owned but used for vacation or other rentals? how marry will be occupied by owner families with "pride of ownership" and other values congruent with Vistas and PEK? Essentially the development is designed for two communities: at the lower elevation, closer to the highway, rental units with their own community center with pool and park, and a mix of covered and open parking spaces for "residents and guests"and the upper increment 2 of owner units with its own community center with pool and park. p. 11. Do we want such implicit segregation in Kona? Timing: Now Kona Three is requesting a 10 year extension to complete construction of just the first increment. p.5, expecting completion in 2030. Water issues: Originally the developers were required to add a 12 acre parcel for "affordable housing" on the makai side of Queen Kaahumanu Hwy. FEMA found "flood zone " issues with that land. A good look at the map an pg. 15 shows that the two drainage ways in the parcels will join to send water dawn to the highway and into what now lies below - Now the County no longer wants to proceed with developing the original 12 acres for affordable housing and K Three is offering to donate land above and Lowe's for 100 unit affordable rental units to be built by a qualifed affordable housing developer- p. 24 Archeology, Another archeological review was made since the original one (p- 164 ff) that identified a total of 18 significant sites: 6 from the pre -contact era 3 habitation 1 agricultural 1 petroglyph 1 with 2 burials There may be more that would be uncovered during any development. The remaining 6 were "likely" from past -contact, historic eras - 1 Planning Dap;. Exhibit 23 Roads connecting to PEK: this application says that no roads will connect to PEK streets Ho'omama and Paulehia across the intervening pasture land. Note that the map on p 19 fig. 7 shows the roads still connecting to PEK streets, however_ Instead a road joining Queen Kaahumanu without a signal light may be built. It's design looks much like the intersection of Hualalai Road and the highway to the north of Puapuaanui_ For more information on the handling of traffic issues, check pp 41-43_ Environment: On p.11 the developer dismissively describes the open land to the south of PEI{ as "vacant ranch land" ignoring the non -human inhabitants of the land and not acknowledging the importance of pasture land to the eco system and future balance of air, earth and ocean in a time of global climate change. One of the consultant evaluations K Three includes a letter from arborists who urge preservation of the trees instead of wholesale grubbing and then additional care for any and all trees - just one example from the larger community of scientists and environmentally astute others. It is staggering to imagine what the addition of 450 residents' vehicles - mare likely 1009 - and additional trucks, vans, and delivery vehicles - will add to the air pollution issues here in the lee of Hualalai. Schools: This development proposal shows no deep awareness of the impact of 450 more homes on local public and private schools. The data used to project a rise in students was done in the 1980's and protects only 10 years into the future. 2018 projects an addition of 99 students to local schools. The lack of qualified teachers is one of our state and local deficits, one that current demographics, not pre -pandemic numbers, need to include- p- 164 It is PI' editors opinion that the Royal Vistas project is another dead end exploitation of open space. It is not a thoughtful or forward-looking use of precious land. ❑r. Kate Kealani H Winter Mori, Ashley From: Sheila Braithwaite {artfulhear1007 gmail_com> Sent= Friday, August 5, 2022 7:13 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: Three things > Aloha, > #1 1 live on Kawena Street above the IN ani Kai lua light. Wednesday evening feral pigs tried to attack a newly arrived VRBO guest as he went to lock his car > #2 Became a resident in 2019; 1 am already tired of hearing about AFFORDABLE HOU 51NG.l11!1 Lived on a resort barrier island far 30 years_ It was 112 vacation rentaIs... sewers replaced septic tanks and 3 Bdrrn homes became 10 Bdrm PARTY HOUSES@ > Here our little neighborhood is so adversely impacted by VR BD. 30 year residents are having their lives sadly and badly affected by ABSENTEE OWNERS! > #3 Driving up the mountain to see my Brands, I am witness to the ridiculous construction of ROYAL VISTAS development. It is destroying the land, displacing wildlife, it will be a horror during the rainy season—and it appears there will be many VACATION RENTALS > Where is the AFFORDABLE HOUSING for the native Hawaiians, for our medical assistants, for our teachers, and for our hospitality workers T A If > Looking forward to your response. > Mahalo, > Sheila Braithwaite > PS Sending a copy to West Hawaii Today > Sent from my !Pad Planning Dept. Exhibit 24 Mori, Ashley From: Jahn Randerson <fjr123@gma1l.c3rn> Sent= Sunday, August 7, 2022 8:37 Alva To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: PL-REZ-2022-000033 Change of Zone Amendment Application No_ PL-REZ-2022-000033 Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No_ 02-131 Applicant: Kona Three, LLC I wish to submit the following camments in relation to this application: Page 12 of the Submission specifies the roads to be constructed in Royal Vistas. The new road to connect with Queen Ka 'ahumanu Highway is the only viable access to the subdivision in phase one because of private land between Royal Vistas and Pualani Estates to the north (TMK 7-6-013:064) and because the extension of Kekuana'oa Place to the south will not be constructed until phase two. This does not fit with the Objective Tran -2 Street Network Connectivity described on page 37 of the submission. Indeed, by having only one access to Royal Vistas more traffic is funneled onto the main arterial highway and no interconnection of roads offering alternative transportation routes is provided. Thus the Objective is specifically negated and the Developers offer no plans for how Royal Vistas roads could ever satisfy the Objectives. I drive Queen Ka `ahumanu Highway every day and am painfully aware that the section from Walmart south to Kamehama III Road is already a nightmare. The County is acting irresponsibly in approving new subdivisions that will exacerbate the heavy traffic on Queen Ka `ahumanu Highway—especially in the November -March snow birder season. I submit that the Count} needs to build interconnected roads to provide alternative routes first in order to satisfy the Network connectivity objective. The Developer needs to specify how the roads in Royal Vistas will fit within the Objective. In conclusion I submit that an extension of time be granted to the Developer but with no construction permitted until the alternative routes for traffic have been built. John Randerson 75-4353 Leilani Street Planning Dept. Exhibit 25 Mori, Ashley From: Claude Thornton <claudethorntonprocketmail.com} Sent= Sunday, August 7, 2022 12:02 P To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Change of Zone Amendment Application No_ PL-REZ-2022-000033 Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02-131 Applicant: Kona Three, LLC Request: 10 -Year Time Extension to Comply with Condition I (Complete Construction of Phase I) and Amendment to Condi,.. This may be my third letter to the County of Hawaii Planning Department regarding the proposed 'Royal Vistas' Development, I am very surprised and frustrated this development is still seriously being considered. Royal Vistas is wrong on so many levels. It's bad for Kona and West Hawaii, Aside from being this eyesore monstrosity of 450 high-densitylhigh-rise housing units, it is the social, economic, and environmental impact that this dreadful development will bear on Kona_ The maco-infrastructure for Kona cannot support the conditions of 14-24 years past. As opposed; to the hardships of today and tornorrow, 1) Traffic: Our only highway.... excuse me, the two-lane country road has failed to keep up with traffic density. Commuting from Captain Cook to downtown Kona is a 40-45 minute trek. This is a nine -mile commute. I've been doing this for B years, shuttling my kids to Konawaena Middle and High School. The volume an this highway has become a nuisance and dangerous. I beg you to gather police information on accident and fatality statistics. Especially at the intersections of Lako and N2ni Kailua_ If you don't live in +Nest Hawaii, you can't possibly understand the traffic disaster Karya residents confront every day. Our country road has faded. 2) Emergency Services: Police. fire, and medical emergency responders and vehicles will be trapped in traffic_ Consequently, the safety and health of its citizen will be threatened_ Mare importantly, these services are impacted. I haven't seen any new fire stations being constructed in West Hawaii_ Is the welfare and safety of your citizens unimportant?! There was a brush fire in February 2022, and the highway was completely closed. Residents were trapped on Alii Drive; consequently, took 2-3 hours for a 4 -mile trip home. Let's add another 1500 or so vehicles to the mix .why don't we?! 3) Hospitals and doctors: One hospital with limited emergency services and trained staff - Kana Community Hospital. Though I commend the hospital for its quality and responsiveness, they have reached the point of diminishing returns, Without additional rooms, staff, and equipment how does the County expect KOH to respond to the increase of papulation from Royal Vistas? The turnover rate of doctors has been atrocious. Personally, I'm on my fifth primary provider in four years, The retention of qualified physicians in West Hawaii is at distressing levels. 4) Schools: As of 2019, there was a shortage of 34 teachers per DOE. The school infrastructure is aging and deteriorating_ As East Hawaii schools are experiencing infrastructure improvements, there has been blatant neglect of West Hawaii Schools from the Hawaii DDE. Schools and the education of our children are much more important than Royal Vistas. Royal Vistas will increase the crowdedness and quality of our school system. I can list many more, such as water, flooding, conflicting interests (tendo Kern): and sewage_ However. I'm confident the Council appreciates these arguments. How can we be thinking of any huge development without having the rnacro- infrastructure in place?! This is not solely a West Hawaii or Hawaii County Planning issue. This is a State and Federal Highway, Hawaii DOE, and Hawaii Planning problem. Solve these critical social, economic, and environmental issues first, before even contemplating undertaking this or any development in West Hawaii_ Your responsibilities are to promote the quality of life of your citizens, Most importantly; preserve the beauty and respect for this island. Mahalo, Planning Dep;. 1 Exhibit 26 Claude Thornton 76-172 Kamehamalu Street Kailua-Kana 96740 Mori, Ashley From: john Bennett <jwb1256gmail.com> Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 9;41 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: Royal Vistas Zane Ordinance No. 02-131 Dear Planning Commission, The proposed develaprnent of Royal Vistas in the Ahupuaa of Holualoa (Long Slide) has many Red Flags that should not be overlooked. I read in the West Hawaii Today recently that another development in the area had been asked to perform a "Cultural Evaluation". The land subject to this Development should equally be asked, as it is rich in history, The Mauka Makai potions of the property align directly with a remnant portion of an ancient Halua located on the north property of the " Hol ualoa Inn" . This Holua is different ( not meant for sport) as it was built for hauling canoes. Directly Mauka of the proposed Development : G uests o Holualoa I nn ca n walk our h 1storIC grounds, where the remnants of an ancient holua slide can be seen in our botarlic l garcons_ www.holualoainn,com/history+-af-the-holua-slide) Directly Makai of the Royal Vistas proposed Development is the Kealakowaa Heiau ( the Path of the Canoe). httr):lldata.bishoarnuseum.argJKekahunalkekahuna.php'?b=closeup&ID=43 Henry Kekuhuna in 5953 surveyed this and states that a canoe Hauling Road from the Heiau " through the Royal Vistas proposed development" past the Holualoa Inn remnant and into the forests around 4000 feet of elevation. Torn Puhaku Stone whom is the leading expert in Hawaiian Holuas with a Masters Degree from University of Hawaii states, "Not 211 holua slides had walls but nearly all those on Hawaii Island do. The purpose was to hold the rock in the slide in some sections and in areas that needed to be raised, When you mention moving of lags from mauka-rnakai that is an irnportant point because the koa forest line was at a lower elevation when we were gathering the great trees for our wa'a, papahe'enalu, etc_ The current Envirornental assessment mentions nothing of this Holua, THE AHUPUAA IS NAMED "HOLUALOA" LONG SLIDE] TO DELIVER THE KOA WOOD FOR CANOE BUILDING. According to the recent EA, You will find mention of double rack walls as merely cattle shoots in recent history. Hooray Bats Hawaiian Hawk (IO) Pueo (Hawaiian Owl) All of these species live in the subject area and are thriving? In -closing, it is very clire that the planning -commission recognizes that the assessment needs to be culturally evaluated before moving forward. Currently the plan does not Conform to the cornrrunity Developrnent Plan, as the EA does not include Historic TraiIs. Thank you for your time, Jahn Bennett Kona Resident Planning Dep;. Exhibit 27 Mori, Ashley From: D_ Blancett-maddac <dbrnkona@aol.com Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 8;17 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: Ray, Alex; Jackson, Maija Subject: No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 change of zone amendment application Attachments: KV ROYAL VISTAS EXTENSION REQUEST AUG 2022.pdf ALOHA, Attached please find an extension of time and postponement and continuance request signed by Kona Vistas property owners and members of Kona Vistas HOA. Time is of the essence. Your immediate attention in this matter is requested. With aloha, Diane Blancett- Maddock Planning Dept. Exhibit 28 August 6, 2022 County of Hawaii Planning Department 74-5044 Arse Keohc)kallole Hwy Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 By Email as instructed. r1-iarrLn 9Iw _c Q }I Ly:. =;4, Cc: Alex,Roy@hawaitrounty.gov hawaitrounty.gov RE: Charge off Zoning Application No_ PL-RE2-2022-Q00 ,33 tCONA THREE. LLC Tax Map Keys: (3) 76-6021:06116 and 017, Dona HI The below signed persons are property owners in Kana Vistas and members of the Kona Vistas Homeowners Association (HOA;. Kora Vistas HCA properties and the properties of some of the undersigned are immediate [y adjacent to the proposed development and within 300 feet of ttIe development. With overwhelming support of the Kona Vista Horneowners, the Kona Nista I -10A Board voted to engage a lawyer on behalf of the homeownersto oppose the development as proposed. The petition by the opposing homeowners is a matter of record, The Board set aside substantial funds for this purpose and engaged Counsel, Attorney SEeven Strauss for this purpose_ A new Board was elected in February of 2022. On August 6, 2022, a Kona Nista homeowner was notified by Attorney Strauss, that effective last Tright (August 5), the current Kona Vista HOA Board President. Angie Bowman had instructed that his representation agreement was terminated_ He furthrer advised that he Nvas unable to help anyone with comments before the currer t deadline, I of 2 The below signed Homeowner's and the opposing homeowners who proceeded in good faith under a reasonable expectation of legal representation are suddenly and without Proper notice left without legal representation or access to the files or ewdence necessary to proceed at this time. We therefore petition, motion for, and request ars extension of time and postponement and con-tinuance of tNs matter for 90 days in order to obtain assistance of counsel in order to protect our rights to contest and oppose this matter - In light of the history of this Matter, specifically that this matter by developer is for an extension of 10 gears to an expired zoning approval issued nearly 4 decades ago in 1984, a short continuance of 90 days to provide due process to effected property owners and interested parties is not harmful or unrea5onable- Time is of the essence. Your immediate attention in this rnalter is requested. Praha to Diane Blanc:ett-Maddock 76-101 Karnehamalu Street (DBMKONA@vAOL.COM) 76 � 39 -es� ))q—,; fi L 1 i11 2 of 2 "let /1, f X 74 -13 7 PIC, PIC, anyone with oomments before. the current deadline. The below signed Hcmeowner's and the opposing hom ovvnevs vrl�O p roceeded In good fai1th kinder a reasonable exp alctafiorr ol� legal r?a-presentalion are suddenly and uvithout proppr rrotice left Wifficut legal representation or access to the files or evidence necessanx to proceed at thi a tifne, We Vierefore petition, mation for, and request ars e,xtensiorr of time and postponement ar-d cont inL;ar co, n th;s rnralt'r for g0 day - ir; 0rdC� r 1.0 u�)ta n assistance of counsel in order- to protect our rights to corte*st ar�d In light of the hisf r�1 oaf this rriattet, specific aVy t1,ra' 1-- �s rrr�al.er k��f devel ope= is fcr err ex -tension of 10 years to an expiYed zoning appi raVal :stiruad r early -4 der-ades ago #r 1984: a ,short continua c -,e of 0.0 days to pd,cuide due process to effected Property ovvners and i-tterested i,, not harrr-ftiI a un.-easrlrratoae. 'T me is of t -)e es:,er ca- Your innmeCiafe attention it this a'iatter JS requested. Mahalo Ufar e Blancett-Maddock76-101 Karr eharrialu Buret 2ill, r 1 E ,r 7 s 1 Mori, Ashley From: Jackson, Maija Sent= Wednesday, August 24, 2022 6,00 PM To: D_ Blancett-maddoc Cc: Roy, Alex; Planning Internet Mail; Kay, Christian; Darrow, Jeff Subject: RE: No. PL-REZ-2022-000D33 change of zone amendment application Attachments: KV ROYAL VISTAS EXTENSION REQUEST AUG 2022.pdt, Re_ No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 change of zone amendment application,pdf Aloha Diane, This email is in response to the attached request to postpone the Kona Three LLC rezone amendment application (PL- REZ-2422-004033) for 94 days in order for the homeowners listed in the attachment to obtain assistance of counsel, The Planning Department will not be postponing the hearing on this application for the following reasons: 1. The application isfor a rezone amendment for which the County Council will make the final decision to approve or deny the request. There will be a minimum of 4 public hearings at which the homeowners and public may testify in person or by writing in opposition or support. One at Leeward Planning Commission, one at the County Council's Planning Committee and two at the full County Council. 2, The Zoning Code provides timelines for the Deputy Planning Director and Leeward Planning Commission to provide recommendations to the County Council forthi5 application_ In order to meet those deadlines and still provide the Leeward Planning Commission flexibility in their decision-making schedule, the hearing will need to be help in October. The Code allows far a longer time, if agreed to by the applicant, We provided your request to the applicant, and they declined to agree to extend the deadline. See attached response. Based on the above reasons, the Department will be tentatively scheduling this application on the October 20=h Leeward Planning Commission agenda. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you, Marfa Jackson, Plot) ning Program Manager Countyof NQwaii Pic r;ning Deportment (808) 961-8159 1P0MUWrV 09 HAW.U'[ Electronic Processing and Information Center (EPIC) We hope th�-il Ilse GcxiMy of Havwa1:Cc, EPIC system has mad ynur api,licalion proress ronvenleni and aasy. Coni octinij with Lis for I101p is ,List a click avh ax,. Click here to requost support. For moro informatbn go to https:llhawaiicountyhi-ener-ovpub.tylerhost.net/Apps/SelfService#lhome. Confidentiality Notice- This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipients) and may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any review, use, disclosure, or distribution by unintended recipients is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender byreply P -mail and destroy al I copies of the original message. Planning Dep;. Exhibit 29 From: D. Blancett-maddoc <dbrnkona@aol.corn> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2022 8:17 AM To. Planning Internet Mail <planning@hawaiicounty_gov> U., Roy, Alex <Alex_Roy@hawallcounty.gov>; Jackson, MaijacMaija.Jackson@hawaiioounty.gov> Subject: No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 change of zone amendment application ALOHA, Attached please find an extension of time and postponement and continuance request signed by Kona Vistas property owners and members of Kona Vistas HOA. Time is of the essence. Your immediate attention in this matter is requested. With aloha, Diane Blancett-Maddock 2 August 6, 2022 County of Hawaii Planning Department 74-5044 Arse Keohc)kallole Hwy Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 By Email as instructed. r1-iarrLn 9Iw _c Q }I Ly:. =;4, Cc: Alex,Roy@hawaitrounty.gov hawaitrounty.gov RE: Charge off Zoning Application No_ PL-RE2-2022-Q00 ,33 tCONA THREE. LLC Tax Map Keys: (3) 76-6021:06116 and 017, Dona HI The below signed persons are property owners in Kana Vistas and members of the Kona Vistas Homeowners Association (HOA;. Kora Vistas HCA properties and the properties of some of the undersigned are immediate [y adjacent to the proposed development and within 300 feet of ttIe development. With overwhelming support of the Kona Vista Horneowners, the Kona Nista I -10A Board voted to engage a lawyer on behalf of the homeownersto oppose the development as proposed. The petition by the opposing homeowners is a matter of record, The Board set aside substantial funds for this purpose and engaged Counsel, Attorney SEeven Strauss for this purpose_ A new Board was elected in February of 2022. On August 6, 2022, a Kona Nista homeowner was notified by Attorney Strauss, that effective last Tright (August 5), the current Kona Vista HOA Board President. Angie Bowman had instructed that his representation agreement was terminated_ He furthrer advised that he Nvas unable to help anyone with comments before the currer t deadline, I of 2 The below signed Homeowner's and the opposing homeowners who proceeded in good faith under a reasonable expectation of legal representation are suddenly and without Proper notice left without legal representation or access to the files or ewdence necessary to proceed at this time. We therefore petition, motion for, and request ars extension of time and postponement and con-tinuance of tNs matter for 90 days in order to obtain assistance of counsel in order to protect our rights to contest and oppose this matter - In light of the history of this Matter, specifically that this matter by developer is for an extension of 10 gears to an expired zoning approval issued nearly 4 decades ago in 1984, a short continuance of 90 days to provide due process to effected property owners and interested parties is not harmful or unrea5onable- Time is of the essence. Your immediate attention in this rnalter is requested. Praha to Diane Blanc:ett-Maddock 76-101 Karnehamalu Street (DBMKONA@vAOL.COM) 76 � 39 -es� ))q—,; fi L 1 i11 2 of 2 "let /1, f X 74 -13 7 PIC, PIC, anyone with oomments before. the current deadline. The below signed Hcmeowner's and the opposing hom ovvnevs vrl�O p roceeded In good fai1th kinder a reasonable exp alctafiorr ol� legal r?a-presentalion are suddenly and uvithout proppr rrotice left Wifficut legal representation or access to the files or evidence necessanx to proceed at thi a tifne, We Vierefore petition, mation for, and request ars e,xtensiorr of time and postponement ar-d cont inL;ar co, n th;s rnralt'r for g0 day - ir; 0rdC� r 1.0 u�)ta n assistance of counsel in order- to protect our rights to corte*st ar�d In light of the hisf r�1 oaf this rriattet, specific aVy t1,ra' 1-- �s rrr�al.er k��f devel ope= is fcr err ex -tension of 10 years to an expiYed zoning appi raVal :stiruad r early -4 der-ades ago #r 1984: a ,short continua c -,e of 0.0 days to pd,cuide due process to effected Property ovvners and i-tterested i,, not harrr-ftiI a un.-easrlrratoae. 'T me is of t -)e es:,er ca- Your innmeCiafe attention it this a'iatter JS requested. Mahalo Ufar e Blancett-Maddock76-101 Karr eharrialu Buret 2ill, r 1 E ,r 7 s 1 From: Dorso A•=_i To: ,Fdtk. ori. HA-- d Cc, Kc and w:^a5hi; Ri;ha-.. Whae:ack; Pc.herr 6. M lams Subject; Re; No PL-REZ-2022-006033 change of zane amendment application DOW Mond aVr August 22r 2022 11:00-22 AH Aloha Mrs. Jrit_kson. Thank you far making us aware of this request, and providing the apportunity for the Applicant tc respond. On behall of Lhe Applicant, Korea Three, LLC, we ask that its change of zone amendment application be SLhied uled befure Lhe Currimissi0WS ❑ctuber 20, 20122 rueeLing in acLordance with its pro;_essing deadline as prrscrihed by the Zoning (.c)dr~, While the Applicant understands why this mclurst to Jrfrr the hearing has brrn mtadc., wr. rire Collectively all part Df a process which the Applicant has Spent rr�uch tir7le and effort to carr�ply since undertaking this arriendrrient process as far back as 2017. The Applicant has Flo cor7Lrol over the decisions or actions of a homeowners' assnc.iation or its individual mem hers, but we. would like to emphasize that this upcoming Commission meeting is just one of at least 4 individual public meetings that inust occur before bath the} Leeward P Ian nip c Commission and the County Council. There is opportunity for due process, as concerned citizens can submit testimony regardless if they are represented by counsel or riot. Finally, we note that [hie HOA, through its loaner attorney, Steven SLraLISS, has parLrcipated in Lhe FPA process that preceded this arnendmrnt request an its comments are part of the off ic.ial record - For the. rrtisons st. trd ahnve, the Applicant rrs;pc-c.tfully der.linrs to w.iv€-' 12L] day Jetldlinr by whlc:h to c:anduct a public hearing before the Leeward Planning Commission. Thank you very much. Daryn 1 %,1, ".1.11 From: Jackson, Maija <Maija.Jackson@hawa'icoL.nty.gov> Sent: Mc;nday, August 22, )02� ]0:.53 AM To: Daryn Arai <Dzryn.Arai@)outlook.com> Subject: FVC: No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 change of zone amendment appliccLion P ease respond to th-s one, From: Jackson, Mzdja Sent: Friday. Au g4.st 12, 2022 4.0.5 PM To. UL ryn Alai' c}aryr7.Arai@OU' uuk.c;orr7> Subject: FVC: No. PI -RF7-202 -O00033 !'IIA 11 g(' c>t }nn r: amc:ndrnc nt appli: atiC� 1 Aloha Daryn, Attached is a foriral request from res dents of Kona Vistas to clefer the hear ng on this mutter for 90 days. The Planring Departmert has not placed this rezone amendment application on the Corr rrission's agenda yet but basec on statutory deadlines in the Zoning Code 't wil likely be sr:h cL riulPri tnr ti C:ramrris5inn'S 0r.tot.r r ?{, rniIr:tirig, unlcss a nr�_r:r tirne is agrn{,-d i.o by they applicant_ P ease provide a response to the attached document. Give me a cull if you, have ary questions. Thank you. Maija From: D. Rk2ric ett-rnadd(-)(' cJ:�r:71CCri,�it�7 r:71.t:r, sig Sent: Monday, August 09, )02] 3:17 AM To: P anr-ng Internet Mail < p larrair�f7.cr:,hr�7iir r)Ik ,�.���> Cc: Roy, Alex<Rl(x.Rc'yffnicc..ntyi.Fcv>;Jackson,Maija<Valla.Jksc-i Mori, Ashley From: Sherry Bracken {jbkslb�7a kona.net> Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 3:48 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: PastorBrianl<eiser gmail.corn Villegas, Rebecca Subject- Comments on proposed changes to Royal Vistas by Kona Three, LLC Aloha, I'm writing representing the Komohana Kai 2 Homeowners Association. There are several subdivisions makai of the intersection of Lako and Kuakini, Komohana Kai 2, with 144 homes, is one of four different subdivisions down Lako Street and Kupuna. Our concerns: 1. The traffic study appears to have been done in November, 2021, which was still during the time of COVID. Local traffic was lighter than usual, and tourists had not fully returned_ Schools had not returned to in-person learning, and school traffic adds significantly to traffic around this intersection, down Lako Street, and down Kupuna Street. If this applicant is allowed to proceed OR to have an extension, a new traffic study, under current conditions, must be required. Based on my understanding of the Royal Vistas plan, it is likely that many children needing transport to Kahakai School will live in the area. Itappearsfrom what I see that there were no studies that specifically addressed both morning and afternoon traffic on Kupuna Street and Royal Poinciana, which is the main path to/from Kahakai Elementary and Alii Drive, with sornetraffic using Lako Street to Kololia and then to Kupuna. Traffic studies must consider Kupuna, Royal Poinciana, Lako Street, and the side streets that empty onto them, as we11 as streets within the existing Pualani Estates subdivision and the intersections already cited by the Developer. And County, or the Developer, wi11 have to find ways to help mitigate the additional impacts to traffic because of Royal Vistas. 2. Morning and evening traffic between Henry Street and Karnehameha III is heavy, stop -and -go during commute times. There has been talk of the segments north and south of Lako Street being widened. This should be done in advance of or simultaneously with adding numerous vehicles to the roads. 3. The applicant cites several items as "Progress of Development". The one copied below, the Laka Street Extension, is not "Progress." Yes, there 1s aplon to extend Lako Street from Kuakini Highway to Alii Parkway (aka Kai lua-Keauhou Middle Road) and Ali'i Drive. As a note, Lako Street currently terminates on its makai end in the parking lot of the Lutheran Church of the Holy Trinity. Representing the Komohana Kai 2 Subdivision, in 2007 and 2008, 1 sat on the Lako Street Extension Context -Sensitive Solutions Advisory Group, which consisted of individuals from the community, from the Lutheran Church of the Holy Trinity, and from several segments of government_ At that time, the intent was to begin the Design Phase in Summer, 2008, with construction beginning in Summer, 2049. The Advisory Group focused much of its energy on how best to calm and mitigate the impacts of traffic through existing neighborhoods of several hundred homes, with pedestrians, including school children, as well as normal slower -moving residential area traffic. However, notl ng has happened relative to further community planning or starting construction on the Lako Street extension. Before any new traffic is intentionally placed on Lako Street there must be a new plan that would address how best to apply traffic calming measures and provide adequate protections far the existing neighborhoods below Kuakini Highway_ The applicant says the only acceptable calming measure is speed humps but we urge Planning to also consider roundabouts, speed tables {such as at the intersection of Kea lakehe Parkway and Ane Keohokalole Highway), and curves in roads. And Lako Street, with calming measures, and the "Ali'i Parkway," aka the Kai lua-Keauhou Middle Road, would have to be completed before dumping (I use the word intentionally) potentially hundreds of additional vehicles onto Kuakini Highway, Queen Ka'ahurnanu Highway, or our local streets below and above the highway. Planning Dep;. > Exhibit 30 Since the appTevaI of both tho Stat c Land Us District Boundary amondment and change of zone in 1984. the foniicr and cturrcnt Applicants havc made sign1f:icant 1)ror ;re ,;N towards coEnpIL tion of thr overall single- and m uIIi1)1c-fancily res ideitiial pre juct, as durn ons(Ta tW by its acuoIII plishrncni of(hu f)lIow'Lng III ileswaus. 1. Lako Street extension (SUB 5738) Creation of right-of-way bi twL� ea Kuahini II gli w ay and the Kai Iua-Keaultou Middle Road to accommodate initial serncnt of I h C propowd uxtcnsioil t}f'I.ako Strect, approved on May 17_ N90- 4. The applicant speaks of "Affordable Housing Credits." County Planning mu5t confirm that these "Affordable Housing Credits" were not part of the recent affordable housing scandal involy!rig County Employee Alan Scott Ruda and others. 5. We acknowledge that more housing is needed in Kona, including housing that people can afford to buy. Our concern is that Royal Vistas will provide too much densityfor an area with already -stressed infrastructure. 5. All nearby subdivisions have underground utilities. This must be a requirement for Royal Vistas as part of a "quality of life" measure_ 7. We note that County Department of Water Supply in a letter dated December 16. 2019 (signed by Keith Okamoto) requested that the developer provide reclaimed/reused water for non -potable needs. That should be a requirement for this or any other new development. it's not clear to us that the Developer plans to do this. S. The developer states there will be solar water heating. We wonder why any new housing project would not have photovoltaic, to help meet the State and County renewable energy goals? New construction is the perfect time to install such. 9. Our community is plagued with developers who are granted extension after extension. As part of the Lako Street Advisory Group in 2007-2008, 1 learned there was a large condaminium development approved for the intersection of Alii Drive and the proposed terminus of Lako Street that had been approved initially in the 1970s, some 30 years prior, and at that time, the developer was still intending to proceed despite changed conditions. Please be conscientious about your decision whether it's smart to approve a 10 -year extension, and the conditions under which it is approved. I am copying the Pastor of the Lutheran Church of the Holy Trinity, Brian Keiser, and Hawaii County Council Member Rebecca ViIIegas. Thanks, with aloha, Sherry Bracken President, Komohana Kai 2 HDA PO Bax 995 Kailua Iona HI 96745 Mori, Ashley From: Sent= To: Subject. DATE TO: FROM Wayne Hemby {vyayneh72 o@hotmail.com> Monday, August 8, 2022 1;17 PM Planning Internet Mail Comment on PL-REZ-2022-000033 August 8, 2022 County of Hawaii Planning Department Clyde Hereby 76-147 ramehamalu St Kailuo-Kana, HI 96740 avneh72 hotrnail.00rn SUBJECT; Change cf Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02-131 Applicant- Kona Three, LLC Request: 10 -year Time Extension to Comply with Condition I {Cornplete Construction of Construction of Phase I) and Amendment to Condition N (Roadway Dedication) Tax Mop Keys: (31 7-6-021:016 and 017, N. Kona, Hawaii I would like to register my comments, per your July 12, 2022 memo requesting comments on the Change of Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 The essence of my comments pertaining to the application: 1. 1 am firmly against the consideration of a 10 -year time extension 2. I am against modification or amendment of Condition N CONDITION N Sidewalks, curbs and gutters will be an important part of the safety of pedestrians and cyclists. It is important that they have a flat and level place to use in order to prevent the temptation of using the traffic lane because there is less slope and no drainage grates to dodge. The sidewalks would also benefit those with disabilities. I was amused at the clairn regarding "shoulders and swale, which has been expressed as the preference of residents within the Kona Vistas Subdivision". If the developer has a comprehensive and current survey proving this claim, ask them to produce it. Since the developer owns lots, they may be counting themselves as "residents" which were the only ones asked about a preference. The answer to this question will tell you a lot about the claims of the developer and the reliance you can have for their "facts" 10 YEAR TIME EXTENSION Planning Dep:;. Exhibit 31 _. There has been a myriad of comments addressing general concerns of the proposed Royal Vistas project. The common and important ones include: Traffic Gridlock -where the developer doesn't state the studies are correct but are "defendable" Flooding -Which already happens and will be made worse without executing a plan to fix it. • Cultural and Artifact -There are historical slides and artifacts that will be destroyed Emergency Services -A shutdown of Hwy 11 would force ambulance diversion to Waimea • Schools- This development would draw new students to at or over capacity schools Wildlife Habitat- Hoary bats, owls, endangered Blackburn's Sphinx Moths will lase habitat + Sewage Hookup and Wastewater Treatment spare capacity is inadequate ■ Many more items seen in numerous comments Developer Proble ms/Ethics/Conf I i ct of Interest Zenda Kern, who is the Planning Director was the consuItantfor the project and is in a position to influence if not approve the project. That is a clear conflict of interest. The developer has, according to public record, made large political contributions to the current mayor's campaign. There was a very public fight over confirming Zendo Kern which was voted 5-4 against and then sudden lyended up 5-4 in favor_ The developer has missed report filing deadlines to the land commission in the past, The developer is currently in litigation with a title company and Kana Vistas over a detail of a past annexation as a matter of public record in case number 3CCV-21-0000074. In this lawsuit they are using a law firm with a conflict of interest. In 38 years, the developer has failed to provide the land for affordable housing, which is really desperately needed, while proclaiming the development, which started as needed "workforce" housing, has devolved into investor speculation and rental {including STVR) units. The inclusion of STVR should trigger a complete re-examination of the project. In the document "workforce" is used 29 times and "STV R" only twice, even while, according to the document, the majority of the units could end up as SNR Other Irregularities It's been reported by multiple sources that the sign for the Notice of Filing of Application is not visible from the roadway. It also appears that very few people were notified because of the Gomes and Calvary property situated between the development and residences rneans there are very few residences within 300 feet. It is not right to treat this development as if it was a single house being built when it will affect residents much further away. The optics are that this is an attempt to sneak this approval past any apposition and quietly into the back door of the process. The document has 105 references to "infill" which means areas adjacent to existing developments, while it is actually adjacent to agricultural land on both sides {the Gornes and Calvary properties. This is not an "infill and should not he allowed to be claimed as such. The 68.837 acres should be reverted to agricultural status. It is after all, between Z agricultural properties. That makes as much sense as what the developer is doing. They are not even proposing "infill" with houses that match neighboring subdivisions but STVR properties, investment properties, multi -story Duplex, Fourplex and SixPlex units that will rise 40 feet above the ground. It is a shame that the community development plan is allowing this overdevelopment, but I understand the CDP is under review and hopefully will be changed to keep Hawaii Island from being as overdeveloped as Oahu. Maybe that's why the developer is in a rush to start. Thank you for allowing mee to file these comments. Mori, Ashley From: Renee Inaba <inabaventures@yahoa.com} Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 3AS PM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Oppose PL-REZ-2022-000033 We are opposed to any extensions of time or granting, extending expired permits related to application: Kona Three, LLC Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-0001033. Housing density in Kona is already considered by many to have peaked out and is overwhelming our infrastructure and resources. Our roadways are already congested, causing lengthy delays as well as accidents in and around Kai lua Kona. It is not just a concern about roadway infrastructure but also water supply as well as schools and other infrastructure services which are already capacity challenged in the area. Any development that is even considered, even assuming they had proper and timely permits, would have to necessarily clear these kinds of hurdles so as not to cause more harm to our communities, i.e., any new developments should necessary fund significant critical and quality of life infrastructure expansion to assure no harm or extra burden on existing taxpayers or residents. The development in question has also appears not have performed sufficient traffic studies, impact studies, environmental studies and review, endangered species risk assessment (known hoary bat habitat, etc.), or complete archaeological and historical reviews of the property that they propose to develop. There are lingering questions about the very limited samples that they have done which seem inadequate to fully assess the impacts of additional development within an already densely populated area in Kona_ There will always be issues related to land contouring and changes to the actual floe+ of the land inclusive of waterways and possilnle flooding with any changes to those contours or waterways. This is a particular concern on this property, ahupua'a, and those around the perimeter and downslope. Development within Kona needs to be clearly supportive of local culture, respectful of historical and archaeological sites, creature friendly for endangered species and others, ecological and infrastructure neutral or positive, waterway preserving to avoid adjacent and down slope liabilities and damage, and species protecting. These concerns are many and significant. The cost and risk of such a development strain the risk -reward analysis for the whole of the community. Downstream costs and burden in terms of cost, risk, and quality of life should be weighed heavily when considering any development within Kailua Kona and particularly in assessing extensions of old permits and zoning issues. Mahalo, for your attention to this matter. We appreciate the opportunity to share our concerns regarding this request_ Today's actions can have adverse future consequences even after the developers are long gone. As we caretake our community and land it's incurnhent on us to preserve the key precepts and principles of our state motto_ Derek and Renee Inaba PO Box 524 Kailua-Kona, Hawaii 96745 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Planning Dept. Exhibit 32 Mori, Ashley From: Sent= To: Subject. Attachments: James H, "Jim" Johnson 76-157 Kameharnalu St. Kailu Kana, HI 96740-8937 Planning Dept. Exhibit 33 Jim 1chnson <jjohnson424a)outlook.com> Monday, August 8, 2022 11:14 AM Planning Internet Mail Comment on PL-REZ-2022-000033 220805 RoyalVistas Flyer Vl.2.docx To: SUBJECT: Comment on PL-REZ-7022-000033 have reviewed the Kona Three, LLC Change of Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2422-00433 for the proposed "Royal Vistas'' development and have the following comments: There should NOT be a 10 -year time extension There should be sidewalks, curbs and gutters installed per the original agreement There are many reasons a time extension should not be granted, but concerns with the horrible traffic flow being mace worse by a new unsignalized intersection, significant cultural sites and artifacts that have not been fully cataloged, concerns that flooding will be made worse and there is no current plan to control flooding are just a few of the reasons. Regarding Condition N, I do not believe subdivision residents prefer swales and paved shoulders over sidewalks, curbs and gutters. If the developer has a current survey or poll, please ask him to produce it. As a safety matter, the sloped swales would tend to have pedestrians and bikers moving into traffic lanes which can result into accidents with serious injuries or death. Ask yourselves if it is reasonable to think those people would prefer to be an sloping ground and dodging drainage grates or an a flat sidewalk, and you will choose the sidewalk, curb, and gutter option. Kona Vistas has swales and they do not handle rains well and we don't have the degrees of slope that is planned for this project. Hence, instant damage to residents' property. have been a resident of Kana Vistas for over 18 years and lived through the construction of the Lako extension. Every day when I leave the subdivision to go toward town on Hwy. 11, 1 am frustrated by the flow and hence, cannot understand how an additional traffic flow could be added without expansion of the highway. That does not seem to be on the long-term plans for the State Division of Highways, so why would approval for this proposed subdivision be allowed before a resolution on traffic is made. Sincerely, James H- "Jim" Johnson 76-157 Kamehamalu 5t. Kailua Kona, HI 96744-8937 Mori, Ashley From: Diane Lagan <Iogaiide@grnaii.com Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 7;22 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Oppose Royal Vistas permit application Attachments: Royal Vistas Opposition 2C22.pdf Aloha, As a resident of Pualani Estates, I strongly appose the Royal Vistas permit application. The HOA's concerns are included as an attachment, and I share these concerns as well, As an individual community member, I appose this application as the comrnunity does not have the resources to provide basic services (e.g., health care, mental health care, transportation) for these "new" residents. chis proposal does not address the houseless issues the community is currently facing. These are not affordable units for current residents, Our schools are already overcrowded and underfunded. As a single parent, a clinical psychologist, and a horneewner, I oppose this application and hope you will also. Mahalo, Dr. Diane Logan 75-6111 Lea PI, Kailua Kona HI 915740 PO Box 5488 Kailua Kona H196745 808.785.5443 Planning Dept. Exhibit 34 The Board of Directors of Pual ani Estates at Kona, a subdiviAon of 362 Single -faintly homes, several hundred yards north of the proposed Royal Vistas project, hereby strongly objects to the requests for time extensions to secure final plan approval and completion filud by the Applicant, Kona Three LLC. for comp€inents of the prop€rsed royal X`istas project. 'G'l'€irk on this portion of the pr€eject_ cnnstrucUon of the multi -family residential component that was supposed to have comnienced l 5' years ago, has never progressed, and the current applicant, who acquired the property nearly seven years ager, now seeks another 10 -years to coinplete that first increment. We believe that the application must be deified for the fol Iowiiig reasons: 1. The traffic studies submitted by the applicant are woefully inadequate because they were taken during, times when the C'C7VID pandennic had Caused a slunllicant decrease In visitors and business operations that resulted in greatly reduced traffic on Highway 1 I _ Furthermore, the studies don't adequately account for traffic volume that would result from other proposed developments in the area that aro also being c€nsiidorcd by tho Planning Department_ 1Vcr do applicant's studies acknowl odgu that the widening of Highway I 1 to four lanes, though needed. is neither planned nor funded_ and is therefor uncertain for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the current traffic conditions on TItghway 1 which are already well belaw acceptable standards during the weekday morning. and afternoon "rLish hours," should prevent developments in the area that would add significantly to t.rafl•ic on Highway I We are also concerned regarding the proposed "Royal % istas" roadway that would serve as a fully channelized entrance to the subdivision from Highway 11. Apparently, this connection would not be signalized. therefore Causing additiolial delays acid creating an additional traffie hazard. 2. We remain concerned about the inadequacy of the arehaeologicaI studies that purport to support the project because there is much evidence that the property includes features of the Holualoa Slide and rock walls that arc mistakenly described as agricultural wall_ In addition. only a small perccntagc of the property has been inspected for archaeological features deserving of preservati oil _ 3_ Although the earlier proposal to access 1 lighway 1 I via road extensions through the Gomes property to Ho'emama Street and Paulehia Street in Pualani Estates, which intersect with Puapuaanui Street, had supposedly been dropped. the current application appears to resurrect it as identified under the Kona Comniunity )development Plan. We emphasize that the proposal, if approved, niust not be understood to allow a substitute for an appropriate and direct access from Royal Vistas to Highway 11. 4. The application for the project relies on outdated information regarding the adecµiacy of public schooI capacity in the area to accommodate the hundred additional students that would he residIn.g in the first phase of the project when completed. 5. The application fails to acknowledge the ineyitab Ie harm to endangered species, incIud111 TToary Bats, and native flora that would result from the proposed development. Nor does it deal adequately with the waver shortages thai have been plaguing the area in recent years, or with the passible effects and rnediatian orprevention of w•atertlow disrriptions, including Hooding, that could restilt from alterations to the landscape. f. Finally, use object. to the application because too much time ( 15 years) has elapsed since this project was first proposed, and 14 years have passed since the first phase was to have been completed_ Yet not one brick has been laid. ft's dine to go back to the drawing boards. Mori, Ashley From: Frankie Hemby <frankie_hemby@c 9rrail.com> Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 1;36 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Comment on PL-REZ-2022-000033 Honorable Planning Committee, I wish to comment on:Change of Zone Amendment Application No_ PL-REZ-2022.000033 Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance No_ 02-131 Applicant: Kona Three, LLC Request: 10 -year Time Extension to Comply with Condition (Complete Construction of Construction of Phase 1) and Amendment to Condition N (Roadway Dedication) Tax Map Keys: (3) 7-6-021:416 and 017; N. Kona, Hawaii Comments to be received by Aug 9, 2022 were opened by your memo dated July 12, 2022 I oppose the 10 -year time extension and the adjustment to Condition N To sage everyone's time I will briefly say that the developer and the project do not deserve consideration or any riodification to the terms agreed to, There have been hundreds or thousands of reasons given for stopping or modifying this development and they apparently have all fallen on deaf ears Thank You Mary Hemby Kailua Kona Planning Dep;. Exhibit 35 Mori, Ashley From: Jerry Miki {jmiki@a havaaii_rr.com> Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 2;48 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Change of Zone Ordinance TO: Planning Department Hawaii County SUBJECT. Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02-131 regarding Tax Map Keys: (0) 7.6.021:016 and 017: N. Kona. Hawaii for Royal Vistas Dear Planning Department, In December 2018 Kona Vista owners were invited to attend a presentation concerning the Kona Vista Three project. The presenter, Mr. Zendo Cern used charts depicting 450 homes and condos high-density to be built on the north side of our Kona Vista community. When questioned about traffic, safety concerns, road access, etc_, we were assured by Mr. Kern that everything would be taken care of. When owners protested, the developer stood up and arrogantly declared that it was our own fault for not researching the 1950'6 Environmental Impact Statement (which was outdated by 30 years then) before purchasing a home in Kora Vistas. Since then traffic along Queen Ka'ahumanu highway has increased, the greedy developers plan to shoehorn two -and three story 176 market rate rentals in addition to 274 market rate for sale units to allow short term vacation rentals into a ecologically narrow, rocky ravine unsuitable for large multi -dwelling apartments. We request Planning Commission members don hiking boots and survey this property on foot to judge first hand whether it is safe to expect so many people to be jammed into this space. We question whether Planning Director Zendo Kern, who slickly tried convincing Kana Nista owners of this project, is caught in a conflict-of-interest situation with the developers, his former employer. We aren't against single family homes with safe entrance and exit roads on this property. My family has lived and worked in Kona since the early 1900'6, always expecting leaders who would see that Kona grew in a measured and rational manner. But this project reflects pure greed and exploitation by outsiders. Please, Do the Right Thing. Restore Pana to our Rina. Sincerely, John Miki & Bonnie Hildebrandt-Miki Planning Dep, Exhibit 36 imiki hawaii.rr.ccm 7-4344 Kinau Street Kailua Kona, Hi 96744 Mori, Ashley From: Mark Powell <markP50 r@a1Uet} Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 11:03 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject: Change Zone Ordinance 02 131 Kana Three, LLC, TMK (3) 7-6-021;016 and 017 Aloha, These tvpcs of high density projects need to be closer to the 'iVillage so as to not encourage driving for scrviccs such as grocery, drug, rc-staurantS, and bus scrvicu, ctc- In December 2018 the Applicants and there consultant Mr. Zendo Kern met with the owners of the Kona Vistas subdivision to unveil their plans for the property listed in the application. Most owners were shocked at the size and scope of the project_ After their presentation a special homeowners meeting was held the following week_ With standing room only all the HOA members wanted the heard to oppose the project as planned. The board voted unanim€ w-,Iy (7-0) to oppose th 1 s project as planned. (Planning Director C'anAiet 'I) Not at any time has the applicants or consultant met with the owners about their major concerns and try and reach an agreement, which should have happened. 1 lowever this proposed prgiect should be rejected for many reasons, Most of all letting Any Short Term Vacation Rentals. This glees against everything the County says it needs in housing acid only be allo�,ved In certain distrlcts..Are 7tormal citizens golrg to be able to afford the rents_ purchase price, acid ntianthly condo fees" Will [here be C'CR's? It doesn't fit w-1th the surrounding properties of single and vA,o story fancily homes. There buildings need to be limited to a height of 25 feet. Less blocking of views. lysing Kekuanaoa Place for the major entry and exit is way toot dangerous_ The grade near Lake exceeds County standards_ It is blind turning off Lako down the steep grade and twelve short driveways are all along this street which 4 are very close to Lako_ This street has a limited view (turti) of Lako when pulling out arid on a curve. standard curbs, gutters, and sidewalks would need to be installed if this road is chosen- Traffic then should be IIinited to just that street Nn others, no turning on to ether streets to prevent running all over the neighborhood endangering existing residents and children, A much better and the safest street A.auld be LiholElio Place_ A very short dead end street that only has five drive�,vays all with a clear view. Also a }getter view up and down Lake. The applicants own the property between the dead end street and the project so it isn't a problem_ Doesn't follow the County's plan Of Nlauka toMakai roads which is extremely important in emergencies such as tire. earthquake, etc, connect Nvith 1'0 place at the top. All roads in there complete project needs to be County roads_ No Private Gates blocking roads in there project. Asking for a 10 year permit extension is ridiculous being so much changes during that time, 1 haven't heard of any buildings the applicants have ever built. Who's go] ng to build it? Flo significant work was ever d€ne for Planning Dep;. 1 Exhibit 37 over 20 plus years so what makes anyone think it can be done iiow_ No significant work was ever done when a permit was in place_ And because the move of business being huiIt north this Dean should be nio -ed rlcrth for job housing, Drainage is a major factor now so adding these ugly monster structures (200 feet X 200 feet X 40+ fool tall) and roads will dramatically increase runoff and floodilig in the areas. if you look at the FEMA flood ntap, roost of this property should be uubuildrtble_ The blocking of views of existing homes is also major tactor along with decreased values looking at these out of place inonster structures, Height limit of 25 feet Should be enforced. The land has proven to have major Pre and Post contact artifacts. Only one small area of 5 acres vv as lightly probed .vith a shovel finding some significant fields. l'his must be explored fully before any permitting. It appears the consultant just passed off the threatened and endangered specs. We krnow and see the hawks and Pueo {owls} there_ These animals do Iive and hunt this property. It doesn't appear they did any sound testing for the Hoary bats. That was brought out in the first env i ron m enta I report that testing needed to be done at a certain tinie ofyear- 1'he giant moth is another one that needs aiore work iit finding true answers. The nu inber i threats Lo the above specs is collision with main- made structureslbuilding.s, loss of habitat,' tree covel.. Also the high potential of shore bird kills hitting the glass or structures_ Facts that the consultant missed, Pueo (owls) have nest scrapes in or on the ground and up to 10 feet off the ground. Hoary bats nest LisuaIIy 8 to 16 feet off the ground feuding in areas of foliag.c. This needs to be really studied along with the Giant Moth- The consultant rois5ed everything. The highway needs to be fully widened to 4 lanes. it's a total F rating now- The County, and Applicant heeds to work }Vi Ill the State oii a complete plan for the widening. More of their property inay be rieeded and the State pray need there till for the widening. I raffic at Lako is always a77 ISS Lie_ Some of the problems are no right turn lane on Lake, 110 11Orth bound acceleration lade from Lake, Kuakini highway has 2 south boun6 merge lanes which cause cars to move into other lanes (left up Lako, right down Lako: or get into the middle lane to go south) in a vury short distance that cause more backups and accidents_ The best for all would be bring Ktrakini straight totheir proposed entry and install a signal light which can be synchronized with the Lako light. Much safer for all and traffic would move much beuer. This application needs to be rcjcctcd until the above issues arc worked out_ Planning no A, will save later. Mahalo Jahn Powell Kai I u a -lona markp502tt.net Mori, Ashley From: Peri Steffenhagen <pesteffe@gmail.com} Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 7;48 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Deny the Royal Vistas Development Permit Dear Honorable Members of the Planning Commission, I'm writing on behalf of my husband and myself to say that we share the concerns laid out by our neighborhood legal representatives. we concur with the conclusions that have been drawn. We are opposed to granting the permit for the Royal vistas Development in its current state. We love our home here and look forward to continuing to enjoy it in perpetuity in the manner in which we've become accustomed. Furthermore, we are committed to honoring the Hawaiian culture by preserving and making it possible to share the artifacts and history with which this land is imbued. We are also for the protection of the natural environment including the flora, fauna, aquifers, and other components that constitute our environs.. Thank you, Pe ri Peri Steffenhagen Pualani Estates Homeowner Planning Dap;. Exhibit 38 Mori, Ashley From: Cheryl Tanguay <cheryIAanguay@grnail.com;> Sent= Monday, August 8, 2022 8;13 PM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Pula ma la KONA Historical Preservation Council Objects to the Application IN o. PL- REZ-2022-000033 Attachments: KV Royal Vistas Objection220809.pdf, Harry Kim 191223.pdf Aloha, Planning Department, The Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 Change of Zone Ordinance N o. 02- 131 - 1 1 regarding Tax Map Kers: () 7-0-021:01 and 017: N. Kona. Hawaii for Royal Vistas, does not have the support of the Pulama la Kona Historical Preservation Council. Please see the attached letter from Antu Harvey representing the Historical Preservation Council which contains the 1953 report by Henry KeKahuna stating the existence of an ancient mauka-makai trail near the Holualoa Drainway and his knowledge of remnants of a holua run down along 10 Place and through the parcel we are trying to save_ As the Kona community Development Plan is undergoing a comprehensive review and are seeking this type of input as well, I will be forwarding this to them shortly. certainly, with the Community developing an understanding of the irreplaceable antiquities that are being lost by reckless development, the expectation is reasonable that treasures on the TIVI Ks referenced here need to be preserved and NO FINAL DECISION is appropriately made BEFORE the review of the Kona Community Development Plan for the General Plan Land Use Guide has been completed, as was also the position given to Kona Three LLC in 2019 by then -mayor Harry Kim. I have also attached Harry Kim's "comments For Early Consultation for Environmental Assessment for Proposed Royal Vistas Housing Project for the TMKs in question" for your easy access and draw your attention to the paragraph numbered "2° Respectfully submitted, Cheryl Tanguay cherVI.tanp.uay grna Loon Kana Vistas Planning Dept. Exhibit 39 2 «I � _ , \\ c«� �l .,;:, ;k 1i . le Ir3 Ti .14.3r7, 03 t3IL4'J L coanty of HaWRIN 1�-1.4 -,N N I V. JDF P -kW51- I E. NT D fat S11 BJECT. (.-oinimcois Far Early (,'r mnItation for Enxiv4�)nmeotai Assf.-i-iMcnt PA' pf-I)IIII.Wa Rovat Vkla, ffuti�dn� Pcoject '1116,LSL 017.1-15IL3310A Tax Man We"A: Ol -6-fl2j to Nol 4 1 ti1i-,wd 'ovu-lEi I`- --F. 1 .1 � -f Z 11 'j-, 'n;.- p- - --�: - -T 4:�LE) nuilil LmL: ) rc--� dz-�AL rck,.TL:j :IT-wu , !L;:jiejitt vin-c- ai�c--,-Il re'llre-.1cl-d PmPcrlv� Ll L Cr�l -� V -, i Ls ..)41 -ul; C. I I LILv- - 11) om R %1 C) I'd D -;'-t t hv� 114-1WLI UL-ait-;WC NO 1 C. I SC. Z.I lsince i -or T -Le Cc.-wnt -in Ed.1d 1. cz "LiIi:vu.- A }D Chi -Al,, [,LA -PAC 6 DLAlE tv L!-b.RT� . fes CLY t� 1 ,I i pril on iL v L,k3Lir,T% cn.Craj P'an M, -,f) t'm LTC)" --IdUTjlR)-L U� ar, Lk-Ll-,-Ilcl::L, Gctl�vji ildn. AL t- -L n � j 4k i -La Lc IL) -� hj t -i I.1C Cl .•rT,. �2i r 'mv. ,'. gl, I S t an tcc t;',_.:-.t_diL17 lea', cry ltJ. pirl r briT"..' in ,i[`. D lfew" 7(-d F 110 K;"_[2 C omm unti Oe ve1 i nf.Tnen I I I I El 11. M 07-e-'MITIL7C 1".Vd.-A; ,2-Ililcaw '10- 1ht &u C T-- A Ll I d t5c r. Sw 5 r cc i IL -L C I Lr C, ayld is Li'Td .1: rc.mw- vt� J -ill-, JL: CziUnj S popej'�V ;�:JCt 7. C- $ TPFCC.01 I Ill -ML4 sl -UL'N I1 ZWlm F� g '-Cpxlmni [t1L I Li" 1.rd 1 [o Ck L - I L W V!,� 'I! ;kl.'I L' P V `L VS. ',L)V'-i 11 1 [-affi "I sorm-num regArAing fl-A-- [_.rkiro,ul iPrL?.1:t%-, T bL lilt: ear bl: ,- I C -A Ltj: '., L 1'y 3-1114- (Ij ]}[vase Selled?]-t aq -,Jlpk., . WILM-131t •u tfi:A 12-t Cl;l V-:1L�,;1-.v all 1114; iL.vb for i. -d4 --ju W 'I,: i ol.V[Wr'w -M'd i t, rit n i T nai r K,) !I i) V[�� Lt5 S UN.1 1 C J 1 1 h e Ll I ? '.eC --i;0 Pe 111 :?,3 L: ioklk (lit CLLut LA cl 16 LY, allabl-i:- 'z -t VOL. -iae Ll' LI L:t'htLS7i.k pLa �,,t f L, C c 1.1 uc a L.! J ( ick.ivl L 9 r" I - :L -V Int MWI I -ALL YL L PIMmInpi. D157LIZE L . lirwk -ki, 10. -14710 ,:- 11 CLI�11 kA' C-"iL!j RLf M LJ K1 fl. '. - 0L: P. C Clfa) 0 11 :I 14: COL. -It C. Mori, Ashley From: Ark Javar <artjavar@att_net> Sent= Tuesday, August 9, 2022 &59 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Comment on PL-REZ-2022-000033 To Whore it May Concern; After reviewing the Kona Three, LLC Change of Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033, for the proposed "Royal Vistas" development, I have the fallowing concerns f comments: a). No ten (10) yeartirne extension b}_ Recommend sidewalks, curbs, & gutters per original agreement While there are many reasons not to grant an extension, listed below are a few I've prioritized: 1. Added traffic to an already heavily traveled roadway, in other words, current road infrastructure is already overwhelmed_ 2. Possible Hawaiian cultural site/ artifacts being affected 3. Flood control not addressed Regards, Art & Lisa Javar Sent from my iPad Planning Dept. Exhibit 40 Mori, Ashley To: Kay, Christian Subject: RE: Royal Dista Letter of Dpposition From: Elizabeth Dunnelit�eth.clur7�7135[�� nt�il,ea r� Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2022 9:13 AM To: Kay, ChristianChrastit.n.K..r, nawa,3county.gov> ........................... Subject: Royal Vista Letter of Opposition Hello Christian: Here's my letter of opposition regarding the Royal Vista project_ Thanks very much, Elizabeth Dunn Planning Dept. Exhibit 41 Letter of Opposition Regarding the Royal Vistas project August 9, 2022 I am opposed to the Royal Vistas project for the reasons listed below: Conflict of Interest between the current Planning Director tendo Kern, and his relationship with the project applicant Daryn Arai, and other former Hawaii County staff that may be involved with this extension request (Sidney Fuke, and Ken Van Bergen, for example). The current Planning Director cannot make any recommendation on a project like this, and at this scale, since he once was the project applicant. No Planning Director should be making any recommendation on a project like this. This kind of Planning application should go before the appropriate Planning Commission or County Council for action. There is no such thing as a staff "firewall` and to think so is naive and insulting. i The recent and shocking case of corruption regarding affordable housing credits is a horrible example of what unchecked staff members (and inattentive supervisors?) can get away with. The County should perform an audit of procedures and processes in all departments. The damage tc the public's trust in its elected and appointed officials will suffer for years from this inexcusable theft. i There should be enhanced or new language in a Sunshine Law that prevents all former Hawaii County staff from being part of a team that submits Planning applications for five years. Given how quickly this island goes through Planning Directors, that should help with a buffer from the "old boy network". This applies to all departments - Planning, Public Works, Parks and Recreation. All of them. * There should be a moratorium on all Planning extension requests. Until there is the infrastructure - roads, sewer, water, parks, medical and dental care, other social services - in place to address the increase in homes, and residents, these proposals should not move forward. Look at these two landmark Planning law cases about moratoria and infrastructure: Construction Industry Assn of Sonoma County v. City of Petaluma, and Associated Home Builders etc., Inc. v, City of Livermore, These California State Supreme Court decisions confirmed that each city used its police power appropriately to restrict the issuance of building permits until the infrastructure was in place, and that restricting the number of building permits was appropriate until the infrastructure was in place, Hawaii County could establish the same provisions if it has the political will to do so. No Short Term Vacation Rentals (STvn) in new housing developments like this. This island needs affordable housing, and at rental rates that working families and individuals can afford. Dur nelghbonccod s are not pseudo resort areas. We did not buy properties to live in and have uncontrolled fly-by-night tenants next door to us. That's what the hotels are for. Rewrite the STVR code to explicitly say this and require Codes, Covenants or Restrictions (CC Rs) for new housing developments to restrict have STVR uses. Long term rentals allow for housing for island residents. Party houses do not. Stop using our neighborhoods as banks for local or out-of-state developers. The appearance of continued indifference about the destruction of Native Hawaiian artifacts by the County of Hawaii and its paid or volunteer staff. Development of lands with important cultural artifacts should be handled more sensitively - not just using the checklist approach of SHPD. Hawaii Caunty should create its awn detailed process to contact cultural or lineal descendants regarding development on lands with these known artifacts. This detailed step- by-step process should be posted on a new County webpage for an honest and transparent representation about haw this issue will be addressed for new planning applications. Elizabeth Dunn Mori, Ashley From: dkim cfxc.tom Sent= Tuesday, August 9, 2022 EO PM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: 'Chris Kim', dkim@cfxc.com Subject: Comment on PL-REZ-2422-00033 I have reviewed the Kona Three, LLC Change of Zone Amendment Application No. RL-REZ-2D22-00003 for the proposed "Royal Vistas" development and have the following comments: There should not be a 10 -year time extension. There should be sidewalks, cubs and gutters installed per the original agreement, There are concerns with the heavy traffic flow being made worse by a new unsignalired intersection, significant cultural sites and artifacts that have not been addressed, flooding could be made worse and there is not a current plan to control flooding. In regards to Condition IV, swales and paved shoulders should not be implemented over sidewalks, curbs and gutters. Sloped swales and may tend to have pedestrians and bikers move into traffic which would increase the possibility of accidents and death. Regards, Diane and Christopher Kim Kona Vistas Planning Dept. Exhibit 42 Mori, Ashley From: james leek <bileeks9l a@gmail.tom> Sent= Tuesday, August 9, 2022 9:28 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Subject. Comment on PL-REZ-2022-000033 I have reviewed the Kona Three, LLC change of Zone Arne ndment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-00033 for the proposed "Royal Vistas" development and have the following comments: There should NOT be a 10 year time extension There should be sidewalks, curbs and gutters installed per the original agreement There are many reasons a time extension should not be granted. I am concerned with the terrible traffic flow being made worse, the noise, not to mention, that flooding will be made worse and there is no current plan to control flooding which is my understanding, In my opinion, we would also have smaller real estate appreciations. , Regarding Condition N, I do not believe subdivision residents prefer swa les and paved shoulders over sidewalks, curbs and gutters. If the developer has a current survey or pall, please ask him to produce it. This is safety hazard issues. Sincerely, Sandra Leek 76-4331 Leilani Street Planning Dept. Exhibit 43 Mari, Ashley From: Mike Park {m1kepark7D45gma1l.com} Sent= Tuesday, August 9, 2022 10;35 AM To: Planning Internet Mail Cc: Jeff Enstram; Noreen Enstrorn Pam Park Subject: Change of Zone Amendment Application No. PL-REZ-2022-000033 - Amendment to Change of Zane Ordinance No. 02-131 Aloha, We are residents of Kona Vistas (76-4319 Kekuanaoa Place} after recently moving ire to the area in December 2020, While we have only lived in Kana Vistas for a short period, we previously lived in Keauhcu (Hale Kehau) so have been familiar with the issues surrounding North Kona and the traffic along Highway 11 since 2014. It was therefore surprising to us when we heard about the Zone Amendment Application for the proposed Royal Vistas dE*veluprrient. There are clearly significant issues that would preclude the building of FORTY units let alone 450 units and we would like to categoricaffy express our strong opposition to this development from moving forward. We have also read (albeit not in detail) the 1913 page document titled Amendment to Change of Zone Ordinance 02 131Atpplieant: Kana Three, LLCand this has brought many other issues to light that need to be addressed before any approvals should be considered, in our opinion. These include the following; As previously mentioned, the project's impact on local infrastructure, particularly traffic in the surrounding neighborhood and the stretch of Kuakinl Highway that runs below the area is a huge concern. The traffic studies submitted by the applicant appear woefully inadequate as they were taken during times when the COVID pandemic had caused a significant decrease in visitors and business operations that resulted in greatly reduced traffic on Highway 11_ Furthermore, the studies don't adequately account for traffic volume that would result from other proposed developments in the area that are also being considered by the Planning Department, Nor do applicant's studies acknowledge that the widening of Highway 11 to four lanes, though needed, is neither planned nor funded, and is therefor uncertain far the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the current traffic conditions on Highway 11, which are already well below acceptable standards during the weekday morning and afternoon "rush hours," should prevent developments in the area that would add 5ignif1cantlyto traffic on Highway 11_ • We are also concerned regarding the proposed "Royal Vistas" roadway that would serve as a fully channelized entrance to the subdivision from Highway 11. Apparently, this connection would not be signalized, therefore causing additional delays and creating an additional traffic hazard. • As we live on Kekuanaoa Place, and this has been identified as an access route off of Lako Street (to the Royal Vistas development}, we must express serious reservations and concerns about the increased traffic flow through this small artery and the challenges of getting back on to Lako Streetgiven the pitch of Kekuanaoa AND the poor sight lines when looking makau on to Lako from the stop sign_ This intersection will create traffic back up and a high risk entry point for accidents. + Even though this proposed development has been in planning stages since 1984, we are still concerned about the inadequacy of the archaeological studies that purport to support the project because there is much evidence that the property includes features of the Hol ualea Slide and rock walls that are mistakenly described as agricultural walls. In addition, only a small percentage of the property has been inspected for archaeological features deserving of preservation. • Finally, we objectto the application because too much time (15 years) has elapsed since this project was first proposed, and 10 years have passed since the first phase was to have been completed. Yet not one brick has Planning Dept. 1 Exhibit 44 been laid, Clearly, previous iterations of the Planning Committee have seen similar issues and problems that have precluded therm from allowing Royal Vistas from advancing. We remain hopeful that our ernail and issues are given appropriate consideration, Vele also know that you are likely aware of some of these issues based on supporting and similar letters that have been subrnitted in the past from other Kona Vistas residents as well as neighbouring subdivisions in Pualani Estates. Equally important, the development has had 38 years to adequately convince the County of Hawaii that this project is worth proceeding with and, yet, the developer is still seeking another 10 year extension. It would appear pretty clear thatthis is nota project worth advancing, Thank you for taking the time to read and understand our concerns. Mike Park 76,4319 Kekuanaoa Place Kana, Hawaii cc; Pamela Park Jeff and Noreen Enstrom Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant November 15, 2022 Mr. Jeffrey Darrow Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, HI 96720 Dear Mr. Darrow: Response to Community Comments regarding Amendments to Change of Zone Ordinance No. 02 131 (PL-REZ-2022-000033) Applicant: Kona Three, LLC TMK: (3) 7-6-021: 016 and 017, North Kona, Hawaii This is in response to comments submitted by members of the community and posted in your EPIC system, relating to the above-described action. Given the number of comments and breadth of concerns expressed, the Applicant has consolidated these comments and concerns into specific focus areas to which it then provides its responses. I. Short Term Vacation Rental (STVR) uses 1. Claim that project will provide opportunities for short-term rentals, compromising affordability. Response: The Applicant is not presenting the Royal Vistas project as a short-term vacation rental community, but understands that owners of the "For Sale" market units will ultimately decide whether to allow short-term vacation rentals of their units or not. The 174 "For Rental" units, which are not permitted to be used as STVRs, are intended to provide a more affordable housing solution for those who are not able to enter the fee -ownership market. The remaining 274 "For Sale" units will be governed by a condominium association, who will collectively decide whether these 174 individual unit owners will allow the option of short-term vacation rental use as allowed by County Zoning laws. While the Royal Vistas project is presented and will be marketed as a residential development, the Applicant is not in the position to restrict uses that are allowed by zoning laws. P.O. Box 4501, HILO HAWAII 96720 Planning Dept. PHONE: (808) 895-3218 EMAIL: DARYN.ARAI@OUTLOOK.C0111 Exhibit 45 Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 2 of 11 November 15, 2022 IL Archaeological/Historical Resources 1. Claim that mauka-makai portions of project site align directly with remain portion of an ancient Holua located on the north property of the "Holualoa Inn". Walls of Holua Slide have been mistaken as agricultural walls. Response: Not True. The Applicant disputes the claims of an ancient "holua" existing within the project site. These claims are based on cited "evidence" that some "kuaiwi" (rock walls) within the project site are parallel, thereby promulgating a theory that someone came and took out all the interior rocks of the holua except those on the outside of the holua, leaving these parallel walls standing where it was mistakenly claimed to have been interpreted as agricultural walls by the archaeological surveys. This theory was based on the supposition that an ancient holua once existed mauka of the project site about a half mile away on the Holualoa Inn property, as advertised by the operators of the Inn. However, an Archeological Inventory Survey of a Grant Increment Road Remnant Property done in 2004 by Rechtman/Desilets has debunked this supposition by documenting that the "holua remnant" as advertised by the Inn operators was actually a State road remnant, and NOT a holua. This Report was done for and approved by the State Department of Land & Natural Resources as well as the State Trails Administrator "Na Ala Hele". In addition, SCS did a Parallel Walls study on the 76 acres in 2019, and confirmed the walls were kuaiwi and not part of a holua. 2. Claim of inadequacy of archaeological studies with only a small percentage of Project Site being studied. Response: Not True. The record reflects full -coverage of the Project Site by various archaeological studies conducted over the past 30 years, as described below: A. 1992 Hammatt Archeological Inventory Survey (AIS) covered approximately 170 acres of both the RS- (Kona Vistas) and RM -zoned (Royal Vistas) lands, approved by State SHPD. This report was sufficient to obtain State and County approval for grading permits and development of the Kona Vistas subdivision consisting of about 215 single-family lots. B. 2007 Hammatt Inventory Update of lower 30 acres of RM -zoned land for proposed Affordable Housing Project. C. 2016 SCS AIS of 5 -acre portion of Parcel 17 originally planned for HPA campus. Approved by State SHPD. D. 2018 SCS Archeological Monitoring Plan (AMP) on 5 -acre portion. Approved by State SHPD. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 3 of 11 November 15, 2022 E. 2018 SCS Inventory Update of 66 acres of RM -zoned lands. State could not locate their Approval Letter of previous Hammatt AIS in State's files, so required a new AIS on the RM -zoned lands. F. 2019 SCS Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA) on approx. 76 acres including the RM -zoned lands. State approved. G. 2019 New SCS AIS on approx. 76 acres including the RM -zoned lands. State approved. H. 2019 SCS Burial Treatment Plan (BTP) for burial site found in 5 -acre AIS. Approved by State. I. 2019 SCS AMP for 76 acres of RM -zoned lands. Approved by State SHPD. J. 2019 SCS Parallel Walls Study for 76 acres. K. 2020 Preservation Plan (PP) for RM -zoned lands. Approval pending. In summary, exhaustive archaeological investigations and studies have been conducted throughout the entire Project Site that have documented all important archaeological sites and its features, with proper mitigation implemented in accordance with State law under the auspices of the State SHPD. The single burial site discovered will be preserved in accordance with State law per the approved Burial Treatment Plan. III. Biological Resources 1) Claim that the project application fails to acknowledge harm to the Hoary Bat and native flora and the loss of habitat for protected species. Response: Not True. A "Botanical Survey and Vertebrate Fauna Assessment" on the property was prepared by Ron Terry, Ph. D in 2017. The results on native flora are summarized in the following: "All plant species found in the survey area during the survey are listed in Table 1. Of the 65 species detected, five were indigenous (native to the Hawaiian Islands and elsewhere) and none were endemic (found only in the Hawaiian Islands). All native plants found are very common throughout the island of Hawai `i and the State, and no rare, threatened or endangered plant species were present. " The Division of Forestry & Wildlife concurs with the mitigation measures included in the Royal Vistas Housing Project Environmental Assessment that are intended to avoid construction and operational impacts to State -listed species including the Hawaiian Hoary bat or `Ope`ape`a, the Hawaiian Hawk or `Io, the Blackburn' s Sphinx Moth and seabirds. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 4 of 11 November 15, 2022 The Applicant will also be observant of the presence of the Hawaiian Goose or Nene anywhere within the project site and if encountered, will cease any construction activities within 100 feet (30 meters), and the bird or birds will not be approached. The Applicant will ensure that work may continue only after the bird or birds leave the area of their own accord. If a nest is discovered at any point, the Hawaii Island Branch DOFAW Office will be contacted immediately. The Applicant will take measures to minimize activities that will attract vulnerable birds to areas that may host nonnative predators such as cats, rodents, and mongooses. Proposed common areas such as the community centers will be managed by the associations to reduce attracting both vulnerable birds and their predators. IV. Adequacy of Traffic Impact Analysisport (TIAR). 1. Claim that TIAR traffic counts were conducted during COVID event and therefore undercounted traffic. Response: Not True. Actual traffic counts were conducted on April 30, 2019 and August 14, 2019 (Section 1. B. Vehicular Volume; Page 9, TZAR). The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a danger on January 30, 2020; the US Department of Health & Human Services issued a similar declaration the following day, and Governor David Ige declared a COVID emergency on March 4, 2020. The first COVID-19 case in Hawaii was recorded on May 6, 2020. Therefore, the most recent traffic count was taken on a school day over 6 months prior to Hawaii experiencing its first case of COVID-19. In accordance with the Trip Generation section of the Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board (per National regulations) it was determined that the Project will generate 117 total (in and out) new trips in the AM, and 137 total (in and out) new trips in the PM. Recent discussions with the County have encouraged the project's internal roadway connection with the adjoining Kekuana`oa Place be completed as part of Phase I instead of deferred to completion of Phase II in order to facilitate left turn and southbound movements onto the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and to optimize the distribution of the project's traffic load between the project's main entry and Lako Street. As presented within the TIAR, when Phase II is complete, the vast majority of Project residents will continue to use the Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway for ingress/egress as it is superior to Lako Street. The traffic engineers have determined that there will be an increase of 37 vehicles during the Peak AM period plus 24 vehicles during the PM Peak period that will use Lako Street. This equates roughly to one additional vehicle Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 5 of 11 November 15, 2022 every minute and a half in the morning and one additional vehicle every two and a half minutes in the evening at the Lako Street intersection. 2. Claim that TIAR failed to consider traffic from other proposed projects. Response: Not True. Section III on Page 18 of the TIAR specifically includes a nearby church; youth gym & sports facility; and the Pualani Makai mixed-use project. The traffic volumes from these projects were added to the traffic count volumes and included in calculations. 3. Claim that unsignalized intersection causes delay and hazards. Response: Not True. TIAR Section III F 2 (f) on Page 31 analyzes Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway and Royal Vistas roadway as well as its design as a Two -Way Stop Controlled (TWSC) unsignalized intersection performance in 2024. All major movements and most minor movements operate at acceptable Level of Service (LOS), with the one exception being the west -bound left -turn movement (turning south toward Keauhou from the Project). This west -bound movement has 29 vehicles during the 1 -hour AM Peak which have LOS F, but their v/c (another method of measuring delays) is 0.49, which is acceptable. There is no reference to this movement causing a traffic hazard. Similarly, TIAR Section IV C 2 (f) on Page 44 analyses the same intersection in 2029 and finds all major and most minor movements operate at acceptable LOS, again excepting the west -bound left movements, which has 29 vehicles in AM operate at LOS F (v/c 0.49 -acceptable) and 12 vehicles in PM operate at LOS F (v/c 0.52 - acceptable), again, with no reference to the Project creating hazardous conditions at this intersection. Finally, TIAR Section V C 2 (f) on Page 56 analyses the same intersection in 2039 and finds all major and most minor movements operate at acceptable LOS, again excepting the west -bound left movements, which has 29 vehicles in AM operate at LOS F (v/c 0.81 -acceptable) and 12 vehicles in PM operating at LOS F (v/c 0.52- acceptable) with no reference to hazardous conditions. The Applicant notes that "The HDOT does not object to the amendment requests to allow a 10 -year time extension related to Condition I and road dedication requirements under Condition N." Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 6 of 11 November 15, 2022 In summary, while a certain specific left turn movement onto the highway at this intersection will operate at LOS F, the overall function of this intersection will operate at an acceptable LOS. As recommended by HDOT, the Applicant has no objection to the inclusion of a condition that will require the Applicant to coordinate with HDOT on any mitigation measures that may be required, including any pro -rata contributions, related to the state highway improvements directly related to traffic generated by the proposed Royal Vistas residential project. Part of this coordination will include a 10 -year development schedule showing the phases, number of units, and the associated transportation improvements to be completed before occupancy of each phase. 4. Claim that TIAR fails to acknowledge widening of Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway to 4 lanes. Response: Not True. TIAR Section III A on Page 17 notes that "Based on the HDOT Federal -Aid Highways 2035 Transportation Plan for the District ofHawaii (July 2014), Kuakini Highway [Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway] from Henry Street to Kamehameha III Road will be widened by 2 travel lanes and include bicycle facilities and sidewalks." As the highway is widened to 4 lanes, the LOS is expected to improve significantly. However, the TIAR also noted that "This [widening] project would have a significant impact on traffic operations. The installation of bike facilities and pedestrian facilities may lead to an increase in bicycle and pedestrian traffic, in which case bicycle and pedestrian safety will need to be further analyzed. Due to the difficulty of crossing a 4 -lane roadway with a posted speed limit of 45 MPH, stop -controlled intersections may need to be signalized or converted to roundabouts." 5. Claim that no specific counts on Ku puna Street and Royal Poinciana, Lako and side streets to monitor school-based traffic and effects on these intersections. Implement traffic calming measures throughout affected area prior to proceeding with Project. Response: The TZAR focuses on traffic volumes and turning movements at major intersections, to assess the capacity of these arterial roadways and its intersections with collector roadways to accommodate anticipated traffic volumes generated by the proposed project in accordance with standard practice. The implementation of traffic calming measures is limited to select collector and local streets in coordination with the County Department of Public Works, and is focused on vehicular speeds, not volumes or turning movements. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 7 of 11 November 15, 2022 6. Claim that traffic along Highway 11 (Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway) below acceptance standards, therefore no further developments should permitted. Response: Not Accurate. The TIAR was accepted by the County Planning Department as satisfying its Concui7ency requirements with the HDOT having no objections to the requested amendment to the rezoning ordinance, provided that the Applicant coordinate with HDOT regarding appropriate mitigating measures to address project -related impacts upon State highway facilities. V. Public Services and Facilities 1. Claim that amendment request utilized outdated information regardingschool chool capacity and therefore did not adequately assess impact of accommodating students from first phase of project. Response: The Applicant's Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) looked at 2018 student enrollment projections from the State Department of Education, hardly "outdated". Regardless, the FEA assumed that approximately 99 students could potentially arrive within this district across all grade levels. Furthermore, since the Project will be constructed in phases, occupancy would occur over an extended period of time and not all new students would be added at once but rather over a longer period of time. 2. Claim that proposed project fails to deal with water shortages. Response: The Applicant has paid in full for about 700 water credits via the Kona Source Agreement (1982) and the Kealakekua Source Agreement (1986). Both of these water systems were developed using the Project's (and other Project's) funds, and have been delivering water to thousands of Kona residents (including the residents of Pualani Estates and Kona Vistas) for decades now. Current water shortages are due to operational issues concerning pumps used by the Department of Water Supply, and are beyond the scope of this Project to influence. As encouraged by the Department of Water Supply and where feasible, the project would include water efficient fixtures and provide water -saving recommended measures for residents. To minimize water demand, the project would minimize landscaping and use xeriscape landscaping where landscaping is installed. In addition, the project aims to implement and balance xeriscape with the provision of safe and adequate recreational space for residents. The project would utilize reclaimed or reuse water for landscaping, if possible. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 8 of 11 November 15, 2022 3. Claim that project will create waterflow disruptions and increase flooding due to land alteration. Response: Not Accurate. As noted, Kona has many (7 major) areas where rainwaters flow down the mountain. Many neighborhoods, including parts of Kona Vistas and Pualani Estates, are impacted by these drainageways, which are overseen by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and administered by the County of Hawaii in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. Traversing through and along the Project Site is the Holualoa Ditch, which is within the County -owned streambed and no changes are planned for this drainageway except for a single culvert as it goes under the extension of Kekuana'oa Street. Also traversing the Project Site is the Horseshoe Bend Ditch, which is also in a County -owned streambed on the upper portion, with the lower half traversing over the Project Site. Preliminary plans anticipate containing these lower on-site waters by trenching a deeper ditch where needed, as approved by the Federal, State and County agencies. Note that by law, the Project is required to eliminate any increase in drainage on-site, so that no Project -related runoff waters are diverted to these ditches. The Applicant has not diverted any of on-site runoff to date as doing so must first require approvals from applicable governmental agencies. 4. Request for underground utilities, photovoltatic systems, pedestrian and bike facilities. Response: While desirable, the sheer cost of underground utilities will force the project to depart from its original mission, which is to build housing units that offer a variety of housing types for both the rental and buyer segments of the mid -market, which includes the workforce group. Solar water heating will be provided, and the Applicant will explore photovoltaic systems to reduce the overall electrical demands of this project. However, interior roadways within and throughout the Project Site will include curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements, with the exception of the existing section of Kekuanaoa Place that currently maintains paves shoulders and swales. As these interior roads are required to be constructed to County-dedicable standards, the Applicant will work with the County to explore the inclusion of a bike lane along these dedicable roadways. Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 9 of 11 November 15, 2022 VI. Affordable Housing 1. Criticism that the project does not provide for affordable or workforce housing opportunities. Response: To address housing shortages in Kona, the Kona Community Development Plan (CDP) identifies Objective HSG -4: Build More Units and Policy HSG -4.2: Workforce Housing. The workforce gap group (up to 180% of median income) includes the part of the population that earns too much to qualify for affordable housing programs, yet too little to buy or rent decent housing close to their jobs. The Project would build units that offer a variety of housing types for both the rental and buyer segments of the mid -market which includes the workforce group. Although the Project is not specifically a workforce project, it would provide a housing option for the workforce gap group. Applicant Kona Three, LLC and the County of Hawaii entered into an agreement on January 10, 2022 to satisfy its affordable housing obligations (Condition J of Ordinance 02 13 1) for the development of the entire 173.66 acres of land encumbered by both the State Land Use District Boundary amendment and change of zone ordinance approved in 1984, which includes the 215 single family residential units within the existing Kona Vistas subdivision as well as the 450 multiple family housing units within the proposed Royal Vistas project. Should these amendment requests be approved to allow the proposed Royal Vistas project to proceed forward, the Applicant will pursue discussions with the County to determine the best affordable housing product to provide to the residents of North Kona, whether it be via on-site affordable units, re -exploring the potential use of the approximately 11 acres located makai of the project site originally intended for affordable housing before it was abandoned by the County, or the purchase of affordable housing credits. These options are all on the table and it will ultimately be the County's decision on how to best satisfy the Applicant's affordable housing obligations should these amendment requests be approved. VII. Project Roadway Interconnectivity 1. General concerns to project roadways connecting to either Kona Vistas or Pualani Estates roadway systems. Response: The Project is planned to have a single access from Queen Ka`ahumanu Highway for Phase I, and a secondary access to Kekuana`oa Place in Kona Vistas Unit 4 for Phase 11. Comments from the County's Traffic Division compels the Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 10 of 11 November 15, 2022 Kekuana`oa Place connection be moved up to Phase L This project has no planned access to Pualani Estates due to intervening privately -owned lands. However, in conformance with the connectivity standards of the Kona Community Development Plan, the interior project roadways will be aligned, constructed and dedicated to the County in order to facilitate the future extensions of Kekuana`oa Place to Paulehia Street and Leilani Street to Ho`omama Street between Kona Vistas and Pualani Estates subdivisions. VIII. Opposition to amendment to Condition N. 1. Claim of elimination of sidewalk improvements within project to the detriment of safety of pedestrians and cyclists. Response: The Applicant believes that there is a misunderstanding regarding the intent of this amendment request. As stated within its request, the Applicant has every intention of providing sidewalk improvements along all connecting roadways throughout the project, with the exception of the non-dedicable driveways leading to the multiple family residential complexes. The existing Condition N talks about avoiding "telescoping" the shoulder treatment where the roadways cross a zoning line. As Kekuana`oa Place is the only road that currently connects to the project site, Condition N requires that the existing section of Kelcuana`oa Place from Kamehamalu Street to the project site be torn up and reconstructed with curbs, gutters and sidewalks. The Applicant polled the 7 nearest lot owners along this section of Kekuana`oa Place several years ago and they verbally expressed their opposition to the replacement of the existing asphalt swale with concrete sidewalks. Furthermore, it would make better sense to maintain the existing swales along Kekuana`oa Place up to the Holualoa Ditch, where it then transitions into curb, gutter and sidewalks as it proceeds into the Project. IX. Timely completion of proposed project 1. Argues that 15 years have lapsed since project was first proposed, and 10 years since first phase of Kona Vistas was completed; stating that its "Time to go back to drawingboard". oard". Response: It has actually been 40 years since the Project was first presented to the State Land Use Commission, which culminated in the approval of an Urban District Mr. Jeffrey Darrow, Deputy Planning Director County of Hawaii Planning Department Page 11 of 11 November 15, 2022 boundary amendment in 1983 for lands that include both the project site and fully - developed Kona Vistas subdivision. In 1984, the County approved the rezoning of these Urban District lands to support the development of A) 215 large lot single family dwelling lots sold at market rates; and B) 450 multi -family dwellings for the middle-class earners of moderate income. Over the next 32 years the 215 market -rate single-family lots were completed and sold. What is sorely missing is the development of residential units for moderate income families. This project will bring 450 mid -market dwellings units to an area with a highly constrained real estate market, and is geared towards existing residents, not new arrivals. Rentals in Kona are in desperate demand, and will appeal to teachers, firemen, policemen, younger professionals, contractors, fishermen, the "move -up" market; etc. Locals moving into these new units will free up existing housing stock in Kona, thereby providing opportunities to other residents, many of them on the lower echelon of income. We hope that this response corrects some of the misinformation presented in comments submitted to the department and at the very least, provides the Applicant's perspective on some of the criticisms about the project itself. As always, should there be any questions or need for additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Daryn Arai Land Use Planning Consultant copy by email: Kona Three, LLC