HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-SMA-2024-000048) RElse_SMA April 2024
COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDATION
PATTY SATHER& STEPHEN ELSE
SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA USE PERNHT APPLICATION
(PL-SMA-2024-000048)
Upon careful review of the applicant's request against the guidelines for granting of a Special
Management Area Use Permit, the Planning Director recommends that this request to two-story
single-family dwelling and related improvements on a 31,363-square foot shoreline parcel within
the Special Management Area (SMA) be approved by the Windward Planning Commission.
Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director reserves
the right to modify and/or alter this recommendation based upon additional information
presented at the public hearing. This approval recommendation is based on the following:
The applicants proposed development consists of a 2-story single-family dwelling
with one (1) bedroom, kitchen, living area, and two (2) bathrooms, a detached bedroom
connected by elevated lanai to the main house that includes one (1) Bedroom and one (1)
Bathroom, and a single car port adjacent to the main house. Additional development
includes the construction of a separate 2-car garage that includes a detached bedroom on
the second floor, and includes one (1) Bedroom, a family room, and one (1) bathroom.
An additional carport and storage shed will also be constructed. The total interior finished
floor area will be approximately 2050 square feet (sf), 670 sf enclosed garage, 1240 sf
lanai, and 660 sf open sided accessory structures. There is an existing approximately 24'x
50' concrete slab on grade that will remain and will be covered by the new dwelling and
lanai structure. Existing permitted septic and electrical systems will be reused and can
accommodate the new development. There is an existing water catchment tank residential
structures that will be demolished to make way for the new development. A perimeter
site fence will be installed, including gates at driveways, and the existing rock wall
located on the makai side of the parcel will remain unchanged. A well will be installed
mauka of the garage structure within the 15' side yard setback. The existing 5-foot
shoreline access easement pathway along the SE boundary of the property will be
cleared, and signage maintained. Also, all obstructions within the shoreline access
1
easement will be removed, including a portion of the existing rock wall and wood posts.
The site was previously graded under a previous SMA permit (2007), and no significant
grading is expected for this construction. Excavation for both continuous perimeter and
internal post footings is expected. Limited grading may occur between the
driveway/carport and the main level lanai stair/entry (approximately 4' above existing
grade). The shoreline was certified for this parcel on October 4, 2022; the makai legally
non-conforming stone wall is located right at the 40-foot shoreline setback line, and will
remain unchanged.
The grounds for approving development within the Special Management Area are
based on HRS, Chapter 205A-26(2) (Special Management Area guidelines) and Rule 9-
11(e) of the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure. Planning
Commission Rule 9-11(e) states that the Planning Commission may permit the proposed
development only upon finding that:
1. The development will not have any significant adverse environmental or
ecological effect except as such adverse effect is minimized to the extent
practicable and is clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling
public interest.
2. The development is consistent with the Special Management Area objectives,
policies and guidelines as provided by Chapter 205A, HRS.
3. The development is consistent with the General Plan, Community Plan, Zoning
Code, and other applicable ordinances.
4. The development will, to the extent feasible, reasonably protect native
Hawaiian rights if they are found to exist, including specific factual findings
regarding:
a. The identity and scope of valued cultural historical or natural resources in
the petition area, including the extent to which traditional and customary
native Hawaiian rights are exercised in the petition area.
b. The extent to which those resources including traditional and customary
native Hawaiian rights, will be affected or impaired by the proposed
action; and
2
c. The feasible action, if any, to be taken by the Authority to reasonably
protect any valued cultural, historical, or natural resources including any
existing traditional and customary native Hawaii rights.
In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A-26(2)(A), the
proposed development will not have any significant adverse environmental or
ecological effect, except as such adverse effect is minimized to the extent practicable
and clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling public interest.
In considering the significance of potential environmental effects, the Director
shall consider the sum of those effects that adversely affect the quality of the environment
and shall evaluate the overall and cumulative effects of the action on the Special
Management Area. Such adverse effects shall include, but not be limited to, the potential
cumulative impact of individual developments, each one of which taken in itself might
not have a substantial adverse effect and eliminate planning options.
The proposed single-family dwelling is within a well-established residential
development/subdivision that was created decades ago. Many of the shoreline parcels in
this area are fully developed with single-family residential structures, related
development, and landscaping. The Applicant has designed the development to be
outside the 40-foot shoreline setback boundary, with the current shoreline setback line
bounded by a legally non-conforming rock wall. There is an existing 5-foot shoreline
access pathway on the south side of the subject parcel which will be clearly marked and
accessible via Ala Heiau Rd. and will not be impacted by the proposed project. Lateral
shoreline access is located along the shoreline area makai of the project parcel. No work,
staging, or placement of heavy machinery will occur within the 40-foot shoreline setback
area. Based on the above factors the proposed project will not significantly alter or
impact coastal resources nor impact public access to and along the shoreline.
The subject parcel has been developed within a well-established residential
community for decades with storage structures, agricultural uses, and residential uses that
had become dilapidated, and the property overgrown. The applicant is planning to
remove the old structures and develop the property for residential use. The parcel has
existing structures, dirt driveway, a rock wall and fencing, with other sections overgrown
with common non-native plants; however, it is not anticipated that any rare or endangered
3
floral or faunal species would be found on the parcel, nor would any be affected by the
proposed project. The new residential structures, garage and related improvements on this
property would have no adverse effect on natural beauty and scenic view planes since it
has been developed for some time and had become unkempt and overgrown. The
proposed project is in line with the existing residential development located throughout
this area, and along Ala Heiau Rd. Based on the small size of the parcel, the previously
disturbed nature of the project site, and design characteristics, it is anticipated that no
historic properties will be affected. Staff submitted the project for review by the State
Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) for a HRS Ch. 6E-42 review; it was determined
that "No historic properties affected" by the proposed project. Additionally, there will be
no change to the shoreline/fishing access or cultural practices that take place along this
coastline.
In reviewing the proposed development against the factors that may constitute a
substantial adverse effect as listed under Planning Commission Rule 9-10 (H) (1-10), it
has been determined that the proposed project as described above will not have a
significant adverse environmental or ecological effect upon the Special Management
Area.
In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A-26, the proposed
development is consistent with the objectives and policies as provided by Chapter
205A-26, HRS, and Special Management Area guidelines contained in Rule No. 9 of
the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure.
The purpose of Chapter 205A-26, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) and Rule 9 of
the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure, is to preserve, protect, and
where possible, to restore the natural resources of the coastal zone areas. Therefore,
special controls on development within an area along the shoreline are necessary to avoid
permanent loss of valuable resources and the foreclosure of management options. The
objectives and policies of Chapter 205A-26, HRS and Rule 9-10(h) include, but are not
limited to, the protection of coastal recreational resources, historic resources, scenic and
open space resources, coastal ecosystems, marine resources, beaches, and controlling
development in coastal hazard areas.
The proposed construction of a single-family dwelling, detached bedroom,
4
garage, and related improvements is consistent with the objectives and policies of the
Coastal Zone Management Program (Chapter 205A, Hawaii Revised Statutes)including:
Recreational Resources:
The proposed project will not impede coastal recreational opportunities. A 5-foot-
wide public shoreline easement is located on the subject property that will remain open
and accessible for pedestrian access to the shoreline. The proposed action will not impact
or change this shoreline access, nor will it interfere with or alter lateral shoreline access
along the rocky shoreline in this area. All demolition and construction activities will be
done outside the 40-foot shoreline setback area and behind an existing rock wall. No
staging of materials or heavy machinery will be allowed in the shoreline setback area.
Thus, the project will not inhibit any coastal recreational opportunities accessible to the
public.
Historic Resources:
The small subject parcel is within a well-established residential community with
similar single-family residences and related coastal developments such as pools and
landscaping. The Applicant has stated that no valuable cultural resources and practices
have been known to occur on the parcel. Additionally, there would be no historic
resources, such as the shoreline public access and lateral shoreline access, that would be
adversely affected by the proposed project.
Scenic and Open Space Resources:
The proposed project site is not visible from the vantage point of any public
highway since there are no views from the nearest highway towards the project site. The
proposed project will not impact scenic or open space resources and the use of a single-
family residence is consistent with the other residential development located along this
section of shoreline and the greater Hawaiian Paradise Park subdivision. Additionally, as
this parcel has been developed and used for some time, the new proposed development
would not present a new scenic impact. The proposed project will not impact existing
public access and would aim to improve the current access and ensure continued access
to the shoreline.
Coastal Ecosystems and Marine Resources:
The subject property abuts the shoreline; however, the design of the proposed
5
residence and the conditions of construction permits will minimize potential impacts to
coastal resources such as soil erosion. All mandated setbacks and government regulations
related to runoff and nearshore waters will be adhered to. No threatened or endangered
animal or plant species are present and as such no adverse impact to flora, fauna, or
ecosystems would be expected to result from the proposed development or any activities
associated with the use. The property includes an existing Individual Wastewater System
that the applicant states is sufficient for the new development. The only native plant is the
common naupaka which will be retained by the applicant. No native or endemic floral or
faunal species are known or have been observed on the project site.
Coastal Hazards:
The property is predominantly within Flood Zone X with a small portion of the
shoreline located within Flood Zone VE. Occupied structures are planned to be elevated
above base flood elevations plus freeboard, and properly engineered to withstand wind
and water loads. No work will occur within the 40-foot shoreline setback area which
includes the VE flood zone. The proposed structures will not be subject to flooding since
the dwelling will be built according to flood zone regulations and will be outside the 40-
foot shoreline setback. The subject property lies between 3-6 feet above sea level and
within the tsunami evacuation zone.
Based on the above information, the proposed development is consistent with the
objectives and policies of Chapter 205A, HRS.
The proposed development is consistent with the County General Plan, Puna
Community Development Plan (PCDP), Zoning Code, and other applicable
ordinances. The General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide (LUPAG) for the
County of Hawaii is a policy document expressing the broad goals and policies for the
long-range development of the Island of Hawai'i. The plan was adopted by ordinance in
1989 and revised in 2005. The LUPAG map designates the site as Rural (rur). This
designation includes existing subdivisions in the State Land Use Agricultural and Rural
districts that have a significant residential component and may contain small farms,
wooded areas, and open fields as well as residences. Therefore, the proposed project is
in-line with the Rural designation of this area and the shoreline area of the Hawaiian
Paradise Park subdivision. The proposed action will retain the essential character of the
6
land and will be consistent with the surrounding area and with the goals, policies, and
standards of the General Plan. Additionally, the entire property and majority of the HPP
subdivision is zoned by the County of Hawaii as Agricultural 1-acre (A-la) with most
parcels in this subdivision developed with single-family dwellings, small farming uses,
rental properties, and related development. The newly proposed dwelling and associated
improvements will be designed and constructed in a manner that is in keeping with the
character of the neighborhood and will be setback from the shoreline further than some
neighboring properties.
Lastly, the proposed development is consistent with the Puna Community
Development Plan (PCDP). The PCDP was developed under the framework of the
February 2005 County of Hawaii General Plan and was adopted in 2008 by the Hawaii
County Council and amended by Ordinances Nos. 10-104, 11-51, 11-52, 11-53, 11-117
and 11-118 in 2010 and 2011). The applicant stated that "the proposed development is
compliant with all land use plans and policies governing the site and surrounding
area/neighborhood", however, no specific were provided. Based on Staff's review of the
Puna CDP, the project does align with certain goals and objectives:
2.4.2 - Strengthen the capacity of the County to identify important shoreline
resources and evaluate development regulations and proposed developments in the
shoreline area. The proposed project will preserve and protect the current shoreline
access path, which is one of only a few in the area. Additionally, current regulations
require the proposed project to be cited 40-feet from the shoreline, which is greater than a
number of dwellings in this area.
3.1.1 — (a)Puna retains a rural character while it protects its native natural and
cultural resources. and (f)native vegetation, coastal and historical resources are
provided new forms ofprotection. This project will be an improvement of the previously
unkempt condition of the parcel, while preserving a vital public access to and along the
shoreline. The improved development of a modest single-family residence will be in
character with the single-family and small farm development of Hawaiian Paradise Park.
The development will to the extent feasible, reasonably protect native
Hawaiian rights if they are found to exist. In view of the Hawaii State Supreme
Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina" decisions, the issue relative to native
7
Hawaiian rights, such as gathering and fishing rights, must be addressed in terms of the
cultural, historical, and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary
practices of the site.
Investigation of valued resources: Based on the previous land disturbance and
development history, no historic properties or resources would be found on the subject
parcel. In conformance with review criteria the project was submitted to the State
Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) for a HRS, Ch. 6E-42 review; SHPD determined
that no historic properties would be affected by the proposed project and the project could
proceed.
The valuable cultural, historical, and natural resources found in the area: The
applicant notes that the subject parcel contains an established public shoreline access
easement and no changes to access or uses to, or along the shoreline makai of the project
site are proposed or anticipated. It is not known whether the subject site or immediately
surrounding area was ever used for the gathering of plants by native Hawaiians other than
the shoreline and ocean which is outside the project area. Given the residential
development of the area, it would appear very unlikely that the site would serve such a
purpose today and/or in the recent past. Thus, the project does not appear to present any
cultural impacts.
Possible adverse effects or impairment of valued resources: No floral or faunal
species listed as threatened, endangered, or proposed for listing under the federal or state
endangered species statutes are anticipated to be on the site. Additionally, no species used
for cultural gathering purposes were identified within the project area. The residential
nature of the surrounding areas would make it less likely to find other protected or
endangered animal life in this area other than what is found along the shoreline and ocean
which is outside the project area. All construction activities will follow Best Management
Practices to minimize adverse point and non-point pollution to coastal resources and
surrounding areas.
Feasible actions to protect native Hawaiian rights: A 5-foot-wide public
pedestrian access route to the shoreline runs through the subject property from Ala Heiau
Rd. This coastline is typically used for fishing and other gathering purposes. The lateral
8
shoreline public access located makai of the project site will not be affected by this
proj ect.
Lastly, this recommendation for approval is made with the understanding that the
applicant remains responsible for complying with all other applicable government
requirements in connection with the approved use, prior to its commencement or
establishment upon the subject property. Additional governmental requirements may
include the issuance of building permits, the installation of approved wastewater disposal
systems, compliance with Fire Code, installation of improvements required by the
American with Disabilities Act (ADA), among many others. Compliance with all
applicable governmental requirements is a condition of this approval; failure to comply
with such requirements will be considered a violation that may result in enforcement
action by the Planning Department and/or the affected agencies.
Based on the above findings, the proposed development will not have substantial adverse
impacts on the environment, nor will its approval be contrary to the objectives and policies
of Chapter 205A, HRS, relating to Coastal Zone Management and Rule No. 9 of the
Planning Commission relating to the Special Management Area.
Approval of this request is subject to the following conditions:
1) The applicant(s), its successor(s), or assign(s) ("Applicant") shall be responsible for
complying with all stated conditions of approval.
2) The Applicant shall secure all necessary approvals and permits from other affected
Federal, State, and County agencies as necessary to comply with all applicable laws and
regulation.
3) Construction of the new single-family residence and related improvements shall be
conducted in a manner that is substantially representative of plans and details as
contained within the SMA Permit application dated January 25, 2024, and representations
made to the Windward Planning Commission.
4) Construction of the proposed development shall be completed within five (5) years from
the effective date of this permit.
5) Artificial light from exterior lighting fixtures, including, but not necessarily limited to
floodlights, up-lights or spotlights used for decorative or aesthetic purposes shall be
prohibited if the light directly illuminates, or is directed to project across property
9
boundaries toward, the shoreline and ocean waters, except as may otherwise be permitted
pursuant to Section 205A-71(b), Hawaii Revised Statutes.
6) All construction and maintenance activities shall comply with Chapter 27, Flood Control
of the Hawaii County Code.
7) All earthwork and grading shall conform to Chapter 10, Erosion and Sedimentation
Control of the Hawaii County Code.
8) All development generated runoff shall be disposed of on site and shall not be directed
toward any adjacent properties.
9) The method of sewage disposal shall meet with the requirements of the Department of
Health.
10) During construction, measures shall be taken to minimize the potential of both fugitive
dust and runoff sedimentation. Such measures shall be in compliance with construction
industry standards and practices utilized during construction projects of the State of
Hawaii.
11) The Applicant shall install a silt fence barrier along the entire length of the 40-foot
shoreline setback area to ensure that no work, or impacts affect the shoreline setback
area. The barrier will remain in place until all construction activities are completed.
12) The Applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for review and approval a Public
Access Plan for the 5-foot-wide shoreline access easement located on the subject parcel.
The Public Access Plan shall include information on management, signage, and language
to execute and record a public access easement in favor of the County for access to the
shoreline.
13) In the event that surface or subsurface historic resources, including human skeletal
remains, structural remains (e.g., rock walls, terraces, platforms, etc.), cultural deposits,
marine shell concentrations, sand deposits, or sink holes are identified during the
demolition and/or construction work, the Applicant shall cease work in the immediate
vicinity of the find, protect the find from additional disturbance and contact the State
Historic Preservation Division at (808) 933-7651. Subsequent work shall proceed upon
an archaeological clearance from DLNR-SHPD when it finds that sufficient mitigation
measures have been taken.
10
14) An initial extension of time for the performance of conditions within this permit may be
granted by the Planning Director upon the following circumstances:
A. The non-performance is the result of conditions that could not have been foreseen
or are beyond the control of the Applicant and that are not the result of their fault
or negligence.
B. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the General Plan or
Zoning Code.
C. Granting of the time extension would not be contrary to the original reasons for
the granting of this permit.
D. The time extension granted shall be for a period not to exceed the period
originally granted for performance (i.e., a condition to be performed within one
year may be extended for up to one additional year).
If the Applicant should require an additional extension of time, the Planning
Department shall submit the Applicant's request to the Planning Commission for
appropriate action.
15) Should any of the foregoing conditions not be met or substantially complied with in a
timely fashion, the Planning Director may initiate procedures to revoke the permit.
11