My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-03-06 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Willo Roback Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-06 Windward Special Meeting
>
Public Testimonies 2-17-24 thru 5-3-24
>
2024-03-06 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Willo Roback Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2024 8:01:31 PM
Creation date
3/10/2024 7:43:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
3/6/2024
Other Parcel Numbers
950190150000, 024, 026, 030, 031, 033, 035; 96001001-003, 011-013; 960020080000, 037, 038, 041, 053
Permit Number
PL-SMA-2023-000046
Parcel Number
950190110000
Description
Opposition testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Willow Roback <br /> To: WPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Proposed development at Punalu'u Black Sand beach(PL-SMA-2023-000046) <br /> Date: Wednesday,March 6,2024 7:50:37 AM <br /> County of Hawaii-Windward Planning Commission(March 7th 2024 Meeting) <br /> Testimony in OPPOSITION of the Black Sand Beach LLC Application for an SMA(PL-SMA-2023-000046) <br /> Aloha Commissioners, <br /> Mahalo for your time and efforts as part of the County of Hawaii Windward Planning Commission. I am writing to <br /> share my testimony that I strongly OPPOSE development for the Black Sand Beach LLC Application for an SMA <br /> (PL-SMA-2023-000046). <br /> I have two main reasons for my OPPOSITION of this application: <br /> 1 The application does not meet the requirements of the related governing legislature(HRS Chapter 205-26(2) <br /> (a)). HRS Chapter 205-26(2)(a)notes that an application must demonstrate that the development will not have any <br /> substantial adverse environmental or ecological effect,except as such adverse effect is minimized to the extent <br /> practicable and clearly outweighed by public health, safety or compelling public interests. A new and <br /> comprehensive environmental impact study needs to be completed along with an updated shore assessment before <br /> any conclusions can be made on the true environmental or ecological effects of development at Punalu'u. <br /> 2 The application lacks a comprehensive understanding of the significant cultural and socio-economic aspects <br /> that hold utmost importance to native Hawaiians and long-time residents of Punalu'u.While acknowledging the <br /> intention of progress and revitalization,the application fails to demonstrate a sustained and overall benefit to the <br /> native Hawaiians and long-time residents who have nurtured Punalu'u for generations.It does not provide evidence <br /> of how sustainable economic benefits will be achieved,such as creating a diverse range of skilled labor jobs with <br /> living wages that enable local families to thrive.Additionally,the application does not outline a plan for the proper <br /> preservation of cultural practices and sacred sites,ensuring their perpetual care and monitoring by knowledgeable <br /> stewards. <br /> I am personally tied(by marriage)to Punalu'u through my familial lines as our family has inhabited and cared for a <br /> portion of Punalu'u for over 80 years and across 4 generations. It is my hope that in opposing this proposed <br /> development application,we as a community will be able to work together to find a better and more balanced <br /> solution between progress,revitalization,and preservation. <br /> Mahalo for your consideration, <br /> Willow Roback <br /> Lwroback@gmail.com <br /> Sent from my iPhone <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.