My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Svenja Telle Opposition Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-06 Windward Special Meeting
>
Public Testimonies 2-17-24 thru 5-3-24
>
2024-03-04 PL-SMA-2023-000046 Svenja Telle Opposition Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2024 6:46:24 AM
Creation date
3/5/2024 1:52:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
3/4/2024
Other Parcel Numbers
950190150000, 024, 026, 030, 031, 033, 035; 96001001-003, 011-013; 960020080000, 037, 038, 041, 053
Permit Number
PL-SMA-2023-000046
Parcel Number
950190110000
Description
Opposition testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Svenia Telle <br /> To: WPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Formal Opposition to Punalu"u Development Project,PL-SMA-2023-046 <br /> Date: Monday,March 4, 2024 12:31:24 PM <br /> I am writing to formally oppose the Punalu'u Development Project, specifically in regard to <br /> the Planning Commission's consideration of a Special Management Area Use Permit(SMA) <br /> based on a Draft Environmental Impact Statement(DEIS) from 2006. <br /> It is evident that the DEIS from 2006 does not adequately represent the contemporary needs <br /> and concerns of our community. Given the significant time lapse since its issuance, relying on <br /> this outdated document would be negligent and fail to accurately assess the current <br /> environmental and cultural landscape. <br /> Furthermore, the DEIS lacks a comprehensive and robust examination of the potential <br /> environmental and cultural impacts of the proposed development. In particular, it fails to <br /> sufficiently address the integration of community perspectives and the protection of <br /> indigenous cultural heritage, despite clear legislative mandates to do so. <br /> The cultural impact study conducted for the project must be revisited with rigorous attention to <br /> detail, ensuring that it fully encompasses the cultural and historical properties in the area, as <br /> well as native gathering and fishing rights. Failure to address these critical components <br /> undermines the integrity of the environmental review process and disregards the rights and <br /> interests of indigenous communities. <br /> Therefore, I demand that the Planning Commission uphold the standards set forth by HEPA <br /> and insist on the comprehensive updating of the DEIS to reflect current community needs and <br /> concerns. Anything short of this would be a dereliction of duty and a disservice to our <br /> community and its cultural heritage. <br /> Thank you for your attention to this matter. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Svenj a Telle <br /> "In a fear decades, the relationship between the environment, resources and conflict may seem almost as obvious as <br /> the connection we see today between human rights, democracy and peace." <br /> Wangari Maathai <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.