HomeMy WebLinkAboutAmerican Planning Association - Policy Guide on Aging in Community (2014)
Aging in Community Policy Guide
Approved by the APA Delegate Assembly, April 26, 2014
Ratified by the APA Board of Directors, July 18, 2014
DECLARATIONS
INTRODUCTION
America is aging—rapidly. Older adults—65 and over—represent 13 percent of the
population today. By 2030, one in every five people living in the US will be over the age
of 65. This aging of America is fueled by 72 million baby boomers aging through the life
cycle in combination with a profound increase in longevity. Average life expectancy
doubled from the mid-thirties in the 19th century to age 78 today. Currently there are
more than 70,000 centenarians in the United States, roughly four times the number
from just ten years ago. And according to the U.S. Census, that number will likely exceed
1 million by 2050.
The American Planning Association (APA) recognizes that the aging of the population
creates a unique opportunity and responsibility to apply sound planning approaches and
policy to improve communities to serve the spectrum of needs and abilities of older
adults. The APA supports the creation and integration of housing, land-use,
transportation, economic, social service and health systems that support a high quality
of life for people of all ages and abilities. A multigenerational planning approach ensures
that the needs of all residents are met and that older members of our communities are
not at risk of social isolation, poverty, declining health, and poor economic well- being.
The planning community can be a leader in encouraging comprehensive approaches and
in mobilizing resources to enhance the quality of life of our aging population
GUIDING POLICIES
A. Actively Involve Older Adults and Engage the Aging Perspective in the Planning
Process
Older adults are the experts on their own lives, so effective planning in all
dimensions—physical design, social and community supports—must involve
older adult participation on an ongoing basis. Older adults are producers,
consumers, leaders, community and family members, and when their potential is
maximized, people of all ages benefit. Planners also must take a lead role in
bringing together leaders across sectors to assess and plan for the needs of older
adults living in their jurisdictions.
B. Ensure a Range of Affordable Housing Options are Available for Older Adults
The promise of aging in community can be challenging to deliver. Communities
should make provisions for ensuring a continuum of housing options to support
older adults ranging from those who are fully independent to those requiring
progressively more assistance in daily life. Policies and programs should promote
affordability, safety and accessibility, incorporate enabling design-based home
and energy efficiency modifications, and foster upkeep and sustainability of the
housing stock. The design of homes should be adaptable and allow different
generations or household types to live in a single home, as well as allow for
technologies, devices and in-home management systems that optimize active
aging. In addition, planners will need to work diligently to ensure access to fair
housing, and address the disparate impacts of housing location and availability
for elders of all races and incomes. There may also be an exit of older adults
from homeownership as they seek to relocate, downsize, or withdraw from the
housing market. Planners may need to anticipate and prepare for this transition.
C. Ensure Access to Quality Transportation Options for Older Adults
A range of transportation choices, including grassroots services such as shared
autos, is critical for older adults to be able to maintain their independence.
Transforming transportation systems to maximize connections with land-uses
critical to older adults, particularly housing, health care, and human services will
enhance the livability of our communities. Viable transportation options can
directly benefit older adults, their caregivers, and health care workers, and
emergency responders. Funding mechanisms should support new and improved
transportation options. Funding and appropriate design of transportation
components such as benches, bus shelters, good lighting, cross walks that are
well marked, and crossing signals with adequate time to cross for persons of all
abilities is essential. The cross- disciplinary education of planners, transportation
engineers, and the people who use transportation systems in support of
increasing these choices is imperative. When transportation systems are
properly designed and implemented, they can help individuals maintain their
independence and mobility by ensuring accessibility to destinations important to
older adults. This includes the maintenance of sidewalks and lights for safe and
walkable neighborhoods.
D. Use Land-Use and Zoning Tools to Create Welcoming Communities for Older
Adults
In many communities, planning for an aging population often has been limited to
concerns over providing space for nursing homes and age-restricted housing. As
planners, we recognize that the location of where we develop or re-develop
housing is equally as important as what type of housing we build, as is proximity
to essential goods and services. Policies, investments, and new tools such as
form-based codes should help create a built environment that intentionally
provides opportunities for older people to easily participate in community life
and activities. This allows them to age in community and not in isolated age-
specific enclaves. Because mobility limitations may increase with age, it is
important to facilitate quality of life for older adults by creating mixed-use, well-
connected neighborhoods with access to health centers, pharmacies, grocery
stores, parks and cultural activities. This includes the maintenance of sidewalks
and lights for safe environments, walkable neighborhoods, and natural areas to
recreate. Redevelopment should occur in areas with an existing network of
community supports and services.
E. Support the Economic Well-Being of Older Adults and their Caregivers
Local economic development policies and planning should address the needs of
community members of all ages and income levels. When economic
development policies and local businesses recognize the needs and assets of
older adults as consumers, workers, mentors, and entrepreneurs, resilient
economies are built. Additionally, formal and informal caregivers represent a
large and largely invisible and undercounted component of local economies.
Caregivers should be recognized and considered in planning, land-use, and
economic policy development. Home care workers, in particular, need access to
efficient transportation and affordable housing options.
F. Strengthen the Community Assets of and Supports for Older Adults
Planners need to design policy and planning responses that address the needs of
older adults— particularly, those at-risk of homelessness—and also take
advantage of the contributions of older adults in all community contexts.
Inadequate physical design must be recognized as a barrier and addressed to
ensure segments of our society are not excluded. Community services and the
assets that older adults and their social networks represent are key
complements to physical design. Older adults have the skills, connections, and
time to put toward helping their communities and are looking to keep active and
remain engaged in civic life. Communities that incorporate opportunities and
services for older adults in all aspects of zoning and economic, land-use, and
transportation planning will allow older adults and their families to engage more
fully in community and economic activities, reducing the individual and societal
costs of institutionalizing older adults who could be better cared for in
community settings. Moreover, community inclusion of older adults will reduce
both individual and societal costs associated with institutionalization. Greener
buildings may also improve the health of their occupants.
DEFINITION, KEY FACTS, AND RATIONALE
Aging in community means that older adults are able to live as independently as
possible as members of the community of their choice. For some, this means growing
older in a long-time home; for others, it means transitioning to a more appropriate and
supportive setting but still in their community. During a lifetime, people develop
connections to place and form important social relationships within their neighborhoods
and communities. Sustaining these relationships plays an important role in aging well.
The aging population presents both a challenge and opportunity to transform and
improve our communities. It will bring profound challenges to health care and social
services, housing and transportation, the workforce and retirement safety net and every
aspect of life. It is also an extraordinary opportunity to create healthy environments that
encourage active lifestyles so all residents may thrive. Planners play a key role in the
provision of access to the structures and services that either support or hinder resident
well-being, independence, productivity, and prosperity.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Jurisdictional plans should reflect the input and experience of people of all ages who live
in different circumstances and with different abilities. The aging of the population
demands a fundamental shift in planning in order to maximize the engagement of older
adults and minimize the economic, social and health challenges that will otherwise
overwhelm communities. Anticipating this demographic change early facilitates
developing key relationships, coordinating critical strategies as well as creating new
options. Finding common themes and opportunities to work with other strategic
alliances will prove beneficial. Collaborative efforts allow partners to advance initiatives
more quickly, share resources, and leverage funding.
HOUSING
Affordability is a major factor determining where older people live and their quality of
life, especially for those with fixed, low-, or extremely-low incomes. There are long open
and closed waiting lists for publicly-subsidized housing, and the need for the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Section 202 Supportive Housing
for the Elderly, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture 515 and 521 programs continues
to increase as people with limited incomes age.
The Seniors Commission Report shows that by 2020, there will be 2.6 million older
Americans who require assistance with activities of daily living or have cognitive or
mental disabilities living at or below 150% of poverty. At the same time, fiscal
constraints have limited the construction of new units and the rehabilitation of existing
units. This affordable housing shortage is a serious problem. Planners should initiate a
dialogue with providers of federally-assisted housing to identify collaborative
opportunities to assist in the rehabilitation of the housing stock and explore
mechanisms and innovative models to create new housing units. Preserving existing
affordable rental housing offers cost advantages over new construction, especially if
funding for new subsidized housing is limited.
The maintenance of the existing housing stock is not only critical to older adults, but
also to their neighborhoods. Keeping homes affordable reduces deferred maintenance
and its cumulative effects on the functioning, appearance, and quality of the home and
neighborhood. Energy-efficiency improvements contribute to a high- performing
housing stock and healthy neighborhoods. Making a home more energy efficient and
maintenance-free can also help older adults remain in their homes longer. Other
changes that can help improve affordability include co-housing, smaller housing types,
and no minimum parking requirements.
Since its creation as part of corporate income tax reform in 1986, Low-Income Housing
Tax Credit (LIHTC) has become the principal source of development equity for the
production of low-income housing nationwide, including specific state-based allocations
for senior housing. Over time, existing projects often lack sufficient resources to make
necessary retrofits and are faced with raising rents to meet this need. The National
Housing Trust Fund (NHTF) was authorized by Congress in 2008, and once funded can
become a mainstay of capital for the development of affordable senior housing and
other forms of affordable housing that can serve people of all ages.
Universal design and visitability standards promote the well-being of people of all ages.
Enhancing the mobility and independence of people of all abilities, young as well as old,
contributes to community vitality. Whether by ordinances or incentives, communities
should explore the benefits of design features that enable residents with a range of ages
and abilities to live as independently and interdependently as possible across their
lifespan. With longer life expectancies and with less personal and societal economic
resources available, minimizing or eliminating the need to retrofit a home, especially
when on a fixed income, is a practical solution. If home modifications are needed, they
should be affordable and from providers who understand the needs of older adults.
Accessible housing environments may be considered a public health issue via building
codes and a civil rights issue from a disability perspective. The applicability of
accessibility standards such as Universal Design extends beyond housing to promote
long-term stability for a wide range of mobility and sight disabilities.
TRANSPORTATION
Age-sensitive design and proper maintenance of the transportation system enables
persons of all ages and abilities to benefit from system investments. Residents who are
forced to navigate a system that does not address age- related changes will experience a
lowered level of functioning, leading to reduced mobility, increased dependence on
family and community supports, and be at greater risk for falls and other accidents. The
consequence of poor environmental design is costly—to individuals, families, and the
community in terms of overall health, quality life, and financial impacts. Communities
earn a greater return on investment from enabling design and a menu of active living
opportunities.
Communities benefit when their planners and designers are well versed in design
methods that result in enabling environments. Similarly, educational programs, such as
transit travel training, encourage greater use of the transportation system by older
adults, which connects them to community activities and services and potentially lowers
the overall cost of providing transportation. It also encourages physical activity which
can lower healthcare costs.
People differ in their degree of physical and cognitive ability, especially among the
oldest community members. As such, a variety of transportation options are needed.
Fixed route bus and rail services will meet the needs of many able to navigate their
communities independently. Demand responsive service may be the most cost-effective
form of public transportation in rural areas. For those unable to access fixed-route
service, specialized transportation services, including human services transportation,
provide an invaluable lifeline. Coordination of public, specialized, and human services
transportation results in more efficient and effective service delivery.
Public funding for specialized transportation has not kept pace with growing demand. In
some cases, private sector resources may be harnessed simply by removing legal
barriers. In other cases, outreach to non-traditional funders can result in untapped
resources for community benefit. After all, community transportation providers often
transport the patients and residents of nursing homes, hospitals and health clinics..
Employers benefit from reduced time off work when their employees can rely on
community transportation services for family members. Home health care workers
caring for older adults often rely on public transportation to get to and from their jobs.
The availability of transportation options facilitates personal independence. Older adults
in many communities rely on their own personal vehicle for transportation, and if that
option is restricted or removed, older adults may become isolated and depressed, as
well as lose their ability to contribute to the economy and the community. This can be a
particular problem in rural and suburban areas, but also in urban areas. Maintaining
social connections is critical for the health and well-being of older adults.
LAND-USE
Enabling design standards which respect the varied needs and abilities of older adults
can decrease demand for services, increase housing choice, and increase level of
functioning, independence, physical activity, social interaction, community involvement,
and civic and economic engagement.
A jurisdiction's policies, services, settings and structures affect people’s ability to age
actively in community. For example, policies such as tax abatements may lead to aging-
in-community by going beyond minimum accessibility levels when transit-oriented.
Optimizing opportunities for health, participation, and security will enhance the quality
of life as people age. Communities must provide the structures and services to support
active aging including the redesign and retrofit of community centers and neighborhood
hubs to serve as one-stop resource centers for wellness and social engagement
including the joint use of schools, churches, and other community institutions.
Older adults often require supportive and enabling living environments to compensate
for physical and social changes associated with aging. The use of new technologies for
affordable home-centric assistance products and broadband connectivity provide social
engagement and stimulation, a sense of purpose, safety, and healthcare applications to
cope with and embrace aging. These technologies include innovative, "smart home"
models and environments that access in-home healthcare and wellness options,
caregiving, and social and learning opportunities. Planners need to be flexible and
address planning and zoning barriers to emerging home-centric options.
Parks and recreation facilities and community amenities provide opportunities for not
only physical activity, but also social engagement, education, nature study, and
environmental awareness. Proper nutrition is a key to maintaining good health; farmer’s
markets and community gardens can facilitate healthy eating and access to fresh fruits
and vegetables as well as opportunities for social engagement.
ECONOMIC WELL-BEING
Older adults and their caregivers represent an under-recognized market segment;
serving these groups offers a new business niche that can meet the needs of older
adults while at the same time promoting economic development.
Older adults continue to work long past traditional retirement age. For many, the
supplemental income is critical for reducing poverty. Older adults also provide a skilled
labor force for the local economy, and work is valued by many as a way to stay engaged
in community life. Tapping into the experience, skills, and wisdom of older adults can
offer tremendous educational and training benefits to younger workers. Volunteer
efforts provide another opportunity for civic engagement and social involvement.
Most caregiving is informal—from neighbors helping neighbors to family caregivers to
car shares and time banks. Planners can facilitate these informal networks and link them
to formal support systems. The caregiver support ratio (number of potential caregivers
aged 45 to 64 for each person aged 80 and older) is expected to decline sharply, placing
increasing demands on local services. Today, women outnumber men as caregivers
three to one. Leaving the primary burden of care for children and elders on women is
poor economic policy, inequitable toward women and has been shown to reduce
women’s health and economic well-being in older age. Long-term lifetime earnings and
subsequent retirement benefits are negatively affected by the inequitable care burden
that women face throughout their lifetimes. Formal child care, elder care and other
social service supports, including transportation, are critical economic infrastructure for
healthy aging.
People live in all types of households. Discriminatory family definitions unnecessarily
burden older adults who wish to cohabitate for financial or other reasons, including the
LGBT and immigrant communities of elders. Discriminatory practices undermine the
potential for new, more innovative housing arrangements that promote household
sharing across generations and non-family members.
Immigration status and work in the informal sector can render subsets of older adults
ineligible for appropriate income support and necessary health insurance. Planners have
an ethical obligation to support federal, state, and local policies that overcome such
discrimination. The perception of growing inequality—especially among residents
outside the labor force, e.g., children and older adults—must be addressed through
public policies at all levels—federal, state, and local. Planners should be careful not to
deepen inequalities through policies that privilege the financially well-off.
COMMUNITY ASSETS OF AND SUPPORTS
Currently, housing and services designed for older adults are principally age-segregated
(senior housing, senior centers, home-delivered meals, adult day care, etc.) This service
design model has several unintended negative effects: it reinforces ageism, as there is
less contact with older people by other generations; areas with smaller populations or
fewer resources lack many of these facilities; and the many existing community assets
(libraries, schools, parks, public transportation, cultural institutions, and businesses) are
often not physically accessible and inviting to older adults. Communities—large and
small—where individuals of all ages, identities, and abilities have opportunities to both
contribute and receive support and share each other’s efforts, talents, and assistance,
promote interdependence and connectedness that make people happy and
communities resilient.
Interdependencies between generations are beneficial to communities, including both
the critical role of informal family caregivers in caring for older adults and the critical
role of older adults within families (caring for grandchildren, contributing to household
support, providing emotional support, and performing other key domestic roles).
Communities where people of different generations live in proximity, work together and
engage in civic activities together, are more sustainable and more resilient. A
community's policies, services, settings, and structures support and enable people to
age actively in community. Optimizing opportunities for maintaining health,
participation, and security will enhance the quality of life as people age. Communities
must provide the structures and services to support active aging, including the redesign
and retrofit of community centers and neighborhood hubs to serve as one-stop
resource centers for wellness and social engagement, including the joint use of schools,
churches and other community institutions.
Older adults represent untapped, vital human resources for communities, contributing
their talents and experience to social, cultural, economic, and civic life. Care-related
services are an economic investment, not just expenditures. These services provide the
foundation for economic development and also provide critical support to family
caregivers. Services such as transportation and home-delivered meals can help ensure
full functionality of older adults. Services for older adults can be linked to services for
children and caregivers thereby increasing access and quality of life for all. Such shared
services also help build political will for community financing.
POLICY OUTCOMES
This section summarizes the desired results from implementation of the guiding policies
above.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Actively Involve Older Adults and Engage the Aging Perspective in the Planning
Process
1. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support community
engagement of older adults in all dimensions of planning. Planners must reach out to all
members of the community, making participation possible across age, language, class,
race, gender, sexual orientation, immigration status, ability and technology barriers.
1.1 Planners should develop mechanisms to regularly consult with older adults on
specific plans, policies, and codes (form-based codes, building codes and land use
codes), Planning paradigms such as Healthy Communities, (codes) Sustainability,
Complete Streets, Transit-Oriented Development and Traditional Neighborhood
Design should be systematically reviewed from an aging perspective. For older
adults particularly, it is important to consider meeting times, physical accessibility of
locations, transportation options, accessibility of oral and written communications,
and relevant agendas. Planners must actively seek out those who are homebound,
who speak languages other than English and those who may not have access to
computers. Family caregivers and paid caregivers can also provide planners with
insight into their needs and desires, and those of their loved ones.
2. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions encourage planners
to meet with public, private, and community stakeholders (including older adults) in
their jurisdictions to assess, discuss, and develop strategies to address unmet needs as
well as apply the strengths of older adults living in their jurisdictions.
2.1 Planners should foster opportunities for community-wide dialogue to bring together
professionals from a variety of fields, including transportation, planning, physical and
mental health, architecture, developers, geriatrics, gerontology, housing, faith
communities, and social work to identify appropriate community designs to support and
involve older adults throughout their lifetime. Planners should align the goals of aging in
community with broader local community priorities to gain trust and participation in the
process and intentionally facilitate intergenerational dialogue.
HOUSING
Ensure that a Range of Affordable and Accessible Housing Options are Available for
Older Adults
3. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support federal
funding for the production of new and preservation of existing low-income rental
housing, including subsidies and financing structures that ensure long-term viability of
affordable rental housing developments, and programs to prevent and reduce
homelessness in an aging population. There should be greater flexibility in management
policies and within rental subsidy programs to allow for the development and
preservation of co-housing and other intergenerational living opportunities.
3.1 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support programs
such as the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program and increased allocations, as well
as increased funding for Community Development Block Grants, the HOME Investment
Partnerships Program and funding to capitalize the National Housing Trust Fund.
3.2 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support strategies
that ensure quality housing choices for older adults, such as the maintenance and
modernization of the existing housing stock through direct financial assistance from loan
and grant programs, mortgage default avoidance education, home maintenance
assistance, home modification programs for people with disabilities, and weatherization
assistance programs.
3.3 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support adopting
policies, ordinances and incentives that facilitate affordable and inclusive housing and
include enabling design - design that enables residents of varying levels of physical
ability to live - in all multifamily housing and single family residential and advocates its
use in housing assisted with federal subsidies.
3.4 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support the
preservation and modernization of federally-assisted housing for older residents;
including the HUD Section 202 Supportive Housing for the Elderly, and the U.S.
Department of Agriculture 515 and 521 programs.
3.5 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support the
identification and reuse of underutilized or vacant properties for the development of
affordable housing, particularly housing for older adults.
TRANSPORTATION
Ensure Access to Quality Transportation Options for Older Adults
4. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions recommend that
local, state, federal, and private entities evaluate and modify their transportation
planning policies and land use practices to ensure accessibility, affordability,
convenience and safety for older adults of all abilities.
4.1 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support requiring
design for the specific needs and abilities of older adults of each component of the
transportation systems, including physical attributes (e.g., interior spaces, sidewalks,
lighting, large button crosswalk controls, retro- reflective signs and pavement paint, low
floor buses with stop enunciators, seating at bus stops), and information features (e.g.,
signage, schedules and website).
4.2 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support the
adoption of policies and implementation of plans consistent with the principles of
Complete Streets, whereby everyone has convenient, safe, and reliable transportation
regardless of whether they get around by car, bicycle, on foot, or by public
transportation, and regardless of age and ability.
4.3 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions urge states and
Metropolitan Planning Organizations and Regional Planning Commissions to explicitly
address the needs and capacity of older road users (drivers, passengers, transit users,
pedestrians, and bicyclists) in their transportation plans, policies, and design standards
including their state-level Strategic Highway Safety Plans and Highway Design Manuals.
4.4 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support cost
benefit analyses of transportation investments to consider age- sensitive designs and
systems to identify the best use of resources and potential savings in both
transportation and broader community budgets.
4.5 Planners should advocate for funding to plan and develop well-integrated networks
of pedestrian and bicycle paths, trails and facilities such as bus stops and rail stations.
5. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support the
education of the general public, stakeholders such as developers, decision makers,
planners and older adults on the components of transportation systems and the effects
such systems have on daily living.
5.1 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support
educational activities for planners, as well as other professionals in related disciplines,
on enabling design to ensure that planning and design professionals understand how
their work impacts older adults’ mobility and overall quality of life.
5.2 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support
educational activities geared towards older adults and their support networks as well as
the general public. All citizens must be more aware of and better-educated on
transportation options and their successful use, including public transportation, mobility
management, driver and car assessment programs, and other public and private
services.
6. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support increased
local, state, and federal funding, and coordination of, fixed-route public transportation,
specialized transportation (including demand responsive, paratransit, and human
services transportation), and intercity bus and rail transit. The overall goal is a well-
integrated or connected transportation system to allow access to daily needs and to
ease moving from one mode of transport to another (e.g. bus to rail).
7. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support policies
that create incentives for private resources to support specialized transportation
services for older adults, including volunteer driver programs, rideshare programs, and
demand responsive paratransit service.
7.1 Congress should adjust the Internal Revenue Service charitable mileage deduction
rate to the higher business-related mileage deduction rate to encourage participation in
volunteer driver programs (in 2014, a $0.42 difference).
7.2 States should establish policies that protect volunteer drivers from unreasonable or
unfair increases in liability or insurance rates that arise solely from volunteer driver
status.
7.3 States and localities should exempt non-profit volunteer driver programs from livery
laws when those programs collect payment for rides to help cover operating expenses.
7.4 States should establish policies that exempt non-profit volunteer driver programs
from car dealership laws that impede their ability to exchange vehicles from older adults
for transportation service.
7.5 Specialized transportation providers should be encouraged to reach out to
hospitals, clinics, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, employers, etc. to help fund
their services.
8. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions recognize the
importance of transportation systems to the health and well-being of older adults.
LAND-USE
Use Land-use and Zoning Tools to Create Welcoming Communities for Older Adults
9. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions recognize that a
gap exists between the needs and abilities of older adults and the design of the built
environment throughout most communities and supports policies which eliminate this
gap, using land-use and zoning as a vehicle for creating enabling environments to raise
the level of functioning and independence of older adults.
9.1 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support the
development of zoning policies for accessible Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), which
are recognized as an important mechanism to allow people to remain in their
communities. ADUs can support caregiving and provide a source of essential income.
Other residential design options include cottage housing, multigenerational homes, co-
housing, or other creative designs.
9.2 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions recognize that the
scale of development impacts an aging population with mobility concerns and supports
policies that encourage smaller minimum floor areas, smaller lot sizes, and more
compact development.
9.3 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support land-use
policies and building codes for the development and application of enabling design
standards (such as large- button cross walk controls, large font signage, wayfinding and
zero-step entries in housing) to ensure that design is accessible at a human-scale
throughout a community.
9.4 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions recognizes that
the provisions of independent and assisted living communities represent essential
community facilities for which required mitigation of exactions may be reduced or
eliminated.
10. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support planning
policies and zoning regulations that foster mixed-use development as opportunities to
co-locate services, land-uses, and programs to offer a continuum of affordable,
supportive living options for healthier, independent living.
11. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support policies
and zoning that facilitates the infrastructure, including emerging technologies, needed
to promote and sustain aging in community and maintenance of day-to-day functioning,
engagement, and contribution to community life.
12. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions recognize that
physical and social connectivity such as lighting and wayfinding are critical for the health
and well-being of older adults. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and
Divisions support policies that create seamless physical and social networks that
facilitate improved health, economic opportunity, and community engagement.
12.1 Planners should coordinate transportation and land use that support community
development policies that require homes, neighborhoods, goods, services, and
community facilities to be physically connected to each other by a variety of
comfortable, safe, and logical mobility options.
12.2 Planners should promote land use planning and zoning changes that support
access to an efficient transportation network, such as mixed use development, transit-
oriented development, and higher density development as appropriate for the
community.
12.3 Planners should advocate for community parks and open space that offer
opportunities to improve and maintain physical health and well-being, as well as park
amenities to meet the needs of those with mobility and sensory issues.
12.4 Planners should advance policies that permit and encourage community gardening
[consistent with the adopted Policy Guide on Community and Regional Food Planning]
that offers opportunities for social connectivity, physical activity, and healthy food
choices and use of products in senior nutrition programs. Raised planters can facilitate
participation of those with difficulties with bending or kneeling.
12.5 Planners should eliminate physical and regulatory barriers as needed to promote
communities with connected and accessible informal and formal gathering spaces, both
indoor and outdoor.
12.6 Planners should encourage communities to consider proximity to environmental
health risks when planning for citing location of residential uses for sensitive
populations.
ECONOMIC WELL-BEING
Support the Economic Well-Being of Older Adults
13. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support economic
development policies that address the needs of people of all ages.
13.1 Planners should promote age-friendly businesses that facilitate access,
employment and use by older adults.
13.2 Planners should promote workforce development programs and volunteer
opportunities for and by older adults.
14. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support the
development of policies and programs that recognizes the importance of informal
caregivers (and often family members who are unpaid) as integral supports for the aging
population.
14.1 Planners should change planning and zoning codes to allow child and elder care in
residential settings and to allow older adults and caregivers to reside together.
14.2 Public and private sector employers should support informal caregiving by offering
through strategies such as flexible work hours, referral to caregiver resources in the
community, on-site support groups for working caregivers, and discounted backup
home care for emergency needs.
15. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions believe that local,
state and federal policy should not discriminate by gender, immigration status,
employment status or family definition.
15.1 Planners should remove discriminatory definitions of family from zoning codes
15.2 Planners should design policies that encourage economic access for all ages.
COMMUNITY ASSETS AND SUPPORTS
Strengthen the Community Assets of and Supports for Older Adults
16. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support an “age in
everything” approach to planning, where older adults are considered in all program and
facility planning along with green building practices to ensure healthy environments.
This is especially critical in suburban and rural areas, where there may not be the
population to support “older adult only” services, but where modification of existing
assets makes them useful to older adults. New models such as the Village to Village
Network and World Health Organization/AARP Age-friendly Cities/Communities are
valuable approaches for active aging in community.
17. Planners should recognize that interdependencies between generations are
beneficial to communities.
17.1 The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions support planning
policies and zoning regulations that foster mixed-use development as opportunities to
co-locate services and programs in intergenerational settings such as schools and
community parks and offer a continuum of affordable housing and service options for
healthier, independent living.
18. The American Planning Association and its Chapters and Divisions believe that
planners—who help shape the physical design of a neighborhood and community—are
key leaders who can help ensure that older adults remain active and engaged in their
community and that support services are easy to access so that frail older adults may
continue to reside in the community and improve their health and quality of life.
REFERENCES AND FURTHER READING
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
1. Finkelstein, R., A. Garcia, J. Netherland, and J. Walker. 2008. Toward an Age-
Friendly New York City: A Findings Report. New York: The New York Academy of
Medicine. Available at http://www.nyam.org/news/docs/AgeFriendly.pdf.
2. Keyes, Laura, Deborah R. Phillips, Evelina Sterling, Tyrone Manegdeg, Maureen
Kelly, Grace Trimble, and Cheryl Mayerik. 2013. “Transforming the Way We Live
Together: A Model to Move Communities from Policy to Implementation.”
Journal of Aging & Social Policy 96(7): 1164–1170.
3. Sykes, Kathy and Kristen Robinson. 2014. “Making the Right Moves: Promoting
Smart Growth and Active Aging in Communities.” Journal on Aging and Social
Policy 26: 166-180.
4. Sykes, Kathy. 2013. Sustainable, Visitable, and Universal by Design. Washington,
D.C.: American Architectural Foundation. Available at
http://www.archfoundation.org/2013/06/sustainable-visitable- and-universal-
by-design/.
5. U.S. Department of Environmental Protection. 2009. Growing Smarter, Living
Healthier: A Guide to Smart Growth and Active Aging. Report EPA 100-K-09012.
6. Warner, M.E. and J. Rukus. 2013. “Planners’ Role in Creating Family Friendly
Communities: Action, Participation and Resistance.” Journal of Urban Affairs
35(5): 627-644.
7. World Health Organization. 2007. Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide. Available
at
http://www.who.int/kobe_centre/publications/age_friendly_cities_guide/en/ind
ex.html.
HOUSING
8. Administration on Aging. 2013. A Profile of Older Americans: 2013. Washington,
D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
9. American Planning Association. 2011. “Multigenerational Planning: Using Smart
Growth and Universal Design to Link the Needs of Children and the Aging
Population”
http://www.planning.org/research/family/briefingpapers/pdf/multigenerational.
pdf.
10. Chapman, N.J., and Howe, D.A. 2001. “Accessory apartments: Are they a realistic
alternative for aging in place?” Housing Studies, 16(5): 637-650.
11. Cisneros, Henry, Margaret Dyer-Chamberlain, and Jane Hickie. 2012.
Independent for Life: Homes and Neighborhoods for an Aging America. Austin:
University of Texas Press.
12. Engelhardt, Gary V., Michael D. Eriksen, and Nadia Greenhalgh-Stanley. 2013. A
Profile of Housing and Health among Older Americans. Washington, D.C.:
Research Institute for Housing America.
13. Farber, Nicholas, Douglas Shinkle, Jana Lynott, Wendy Fox-Grage, and Rodney
Harrell. 2011. “Aging in Place: A State Survey of Livability Policies and Practices.”
Washington, D.C.: AARP Public Policy Institute. Available at
http://www.aarp.org/home-garden/livable-communities/info-11-2011/Aging-In-
Place.html.
14. Gray, Regina C., Rodney Harrell, and Kathy Sykes. 2010. “The Built Environment;
Planning Healthy Communities for All Ages: Community Design, Neighborhood
Change, and Impact on Older Adults.” The Public Policy and Aging Report 20(3):
22-26.
15. Harrell, Rodney, Allison Brooks, and Todd Nedwick. 2009. Preserving
Affordability and Access in Livable Communities: Subsidized Housing
Opportunities Near Transit and the 50+ Population. Washington, D.C.: AARP
Public Policy Institute. Available at http://www.aarp.org/home-
garden/housing/info-09-2009/2009-15.html.
16. Howe, D.A. 1990. “The flexible house: Designing for changing needs.” Journal of
the American Planning Association 56 (1): 69-79.
17. Krassioukova-Enns, Olga and Laurie Ringaert. 2007. “Understanding the Status of
Visitability in Canada.” CR File No.: 6585-K087 Final Report submitted to Jim
Zamprelli, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation. Available at
http://disabilitystudies.ca/licproject/files/2011/07/2007-Visitability-Final-
Report.pdf.
18. Lawton, M.P. and L. Nahemow. 1973. “Ecology and the aging process” in The
Psychology of Adult Development and Aging, ed. C. Eisdorfer & M.P. Lawton.
Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
19. Myers, Dowell and SungHo Ryu. 2008. “Aging Baby Boomers and the
Generational Housing Bubble: Foresight and Mitigation of an Epic Transition,”
Journal of the American Planning Association 74 (1): 17- 33.
20. NeighborWorks. 2011. “Aging in Place.” Available at
http://www.nw.org/Network/comstrat/agingInPlace.
21. Salomon, Emily. 2010. “Expanding Implementation of Universal Design and
Visitability Features in the Housing Stock.” Fact Sheet 167. Washington, D.C.:
AARP Public Policy Institute. Available at
http://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/livable-
communities/act/housing/expanding-implementation- of-universal-design-and-
visitability-features-in-the-housing-stock-aarp.pdf
22. Tenenbaumn, Louis. 2010. The MetLife Report on Aging in Place 2.0: Rethinking
Solutions to the Home Care Challenge. New York: MetLife Mature Market
Institute. Available at:
https://www.metlife.com/assets/cao/mmi/publications/studies/2010/mmi-
aging-place-study.pdf.
23. The Jewish Federations of North America, Inc. 2014. “Naturally Occurring
Retirement Communities (NORC) Aging in Place Initiative.” Available at
http://www.norcs.org.
24. Village to Village Network. 2014. “Village to Village Network.” Available at
http://www.vtvnetwork.org.
TRANSPORTATION
25. Lynott, Jana and Carlos Figueiredo. 2011. How the Travel Patterns of Older
Adults are Changing: Highlights from the 2009 National Household Travel Survey.
Fact Sheet 218. Available at http://www.aarp.org/home-
garden/transportation/info-04-2011/fs218-transportation.html
26. Lynott, Jana, Amanda Taylor, Hannah Twaddell, Jessica Haase, Kristin Nelson,
Barbara McCann, and Edward R. Stollof. 2009. Planning for Complete Streets for
an Aging America. Report 2009-02. Washington DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.
Available at http://www.aarp.org/home-garden/livable- communities/info-08-
2009/Planning_Complete_Streets_for_an_Aging_America.html.
27. Lynott, Jana, Wendy Fox-Grage, and Shannon Guzman. 2013. Weaving It
Together: A Tapestry of Transportation Funding for Older Adults. Washington,
D.C.: AARP Public Policy Institute. Available at
http://www.aarp.org/research/ppi/liv-
com2/policy/transportation/articles/weaving-it-together- transportation-
funding-for-older-adults-AARP-ppi-liv-com/.
LAND-USE
28. Howe, D.A., Chapman, N.J. and Baggett, S.A. 1994. Planning For an Aging Society.
Planning Advisory Service Report no. 451. Chicago: American Planning
Association.
29. Howe, D.A. 2013. “Planning for aging involves planning for life” in Policy,
Planning, and People: Promoting Justice in Urban Development, ed. Naomi
Carmon and Susan S. Fainstein. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
30. Howe, D.A. 2012. “Aging as the foundation for livable communities.” Pp. 81-98 in
Community Livability: Issues and Approaches to Sustaining the Well-Being of
People and Communities, ed. F. Wagner and R. Caves. New York: Routledge.
ECONOMIC WELL-BEING
31. Edwards, Ryan D. 2010. “Forecasting Government Revenue and Expenditure in
the U.S. Using Data on Age-Specific Utilization.” Working Paper WP10-01.
Honolulu: National Transfer Accounts Project.
32. Isaacs, Julia. 2009. How Much Do We Spend on Children and the Elderly?
Economic Studies Report. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute. Available at
http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/research/files/reports/2009/11/05%20spen
ding%20children%20isaa cs/1_how_much_isaacs.pdf.
33. Lynott, Jana. 2012. “Active Living for All Ages: Creating Neighborhoods around
Transit.” Washington, D.C.: AARP Public Policy Institute. Video. Available at
http://www.aarp.org/research/ppi/liv-
com2/policy/transportation/articles/active-living-for-all-ages-neighborhoods-
around-transit-video-AARP- ppi-liv-com/
34. Myers, Dowell. 2007. Immigrants and Boomers: Forging a New Social Contract
for the Future of America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
35. Redfoot, Donald, Lynn Feinberg, and Ari Houser. 2013. “The Aging of the Baby
Boom and the Growing Care Gap: A Look at Future Declines in the Availability of
Family Caregivers.” Insight on the Issues Report 85. Washington, D.C.: AARP
Public Policy Institute.
36. Warner, Mildred E. and Rebecca Baran-Rees. 2012. “The Economic Importance
of Families with Children.” Issue Brief. Ithaca: Cornell University. Available at
http://cms.mildredwarner.org/p/129.
COMMUNITY ASSETS AND SUPPORTS
37. Hodgson, Kimberley. 2011. “Multigenerational Planning: Using Smart Growth
and Universal Design to Link the Needs of Children and the Aging Population.”
Family-Friendly Communities Briefing Papers 02. Washington, D.C.: American
Planning Association. Available at
https://www.planning.org/research/family/briefingpapers/pdf/multigenerationa
l.pdf.
38. Israel, Evelyn and Mildred Warner. 2008. “Planning for Family Friendly
Communities.” PAS Memo. Washington, DC: American Planning Association.
Available at http://www.planning.org/pas/memo/open/nov2008/index.htm.
39. Morken, Lydia and Mildred Warner. 2012. “Planning for the Aging Population:
Rural Responses to the Challenge.” Issue Brief. Washington, D.C.: National
Association of Area Agencies on Aging, and Ithaca: Cornell University. Available
at http://cms.mildredwarner.org/p/146.
40. Morken, Lydia and Rebecca Baran-Rees. 2012. “Joint Use: School-Community
Collaboration.” Issue Brief. Ithaca: Cornell University. Available at
http://cms.mildredwarner.org/p/147.
41. National Association of Area Agencies on Aging. 2011. The Maturing of America:
Communities Moving Forward for an Aging Population. Washington, D.C.:
National Association of Area Agencies on Aging. Available at
www.n4a.org/files/MOA_FINAL_Rpt.pdf.
42. Vincent, Jeffrey, Mary Filardo, Marni Allen and Jason Franklin. 2010. Joint Use of
Public Schools: A Framework for a New Social Contract. Washington, D.C.: 21st
Century School Fund and Center for Cities and Schools.
43. Warner, Mildred, and Lydia Morken. 2013. “Building Child and Age-friendly
Communities in Tight Fiscal Times.” Pp. 47-56 in The Municipal Year Book 2013.
Washington, D.C.: International City County Management Association.
44. World Health Organization.2012.“WHO Global Network of Age-friendly Cities
and Communities.” Map. Available at http://www.agefriendlyworld.org/cities-
and-communities.
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER POLICY GUIDES OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
This Policy Guide is related to other Policy Guides adopted by the American Planning
Association in recent years, including:
• Smart Growth Policy Guide (adopted 2012)
• Surface Transportation Policy Guide (adopted in 2010)
• Housing Policy Guide (adopted in 2006)
• Other policy guides addressing food systems planning, security, neighborhood
collaboration, sustainability and public redevelopment all indirectly address the
needs of the elderly. Please refer directly to these closely allied policy guides for
additional policy reference on those topics: http://planning.org/policy/guides/.
AGING IN COMMUNITY POLICY GUIDE TASK FORCE AUTHORS
Jill Bahm, AICP
Mitzi Barker, FAICP
Dorian Block
Ruth Finkelstein
Ben Frost, AICP
Esther Greenhouse
Michael Horsting, AICP
Deborah Howe, FAICP
Laura Keyes, AICP
Jana Lynott, AICP
Ramona Mullahey
Margaret Neal
Jennifer Raitt
Kathy Sykes
Mildred E. Warner
Bradley Winick, AICP
TECHNICAL REVIEWERS
Alan DeLaTorre
Rodney Harrell
Enid Kassner