HomeMy WebLinkAboutPD RECOMMENDATION REPORT nRWinegar-FurchgottRepeaUtEZ.jaO42223
COUNTY OF HAWAII PLANNING DEPARTMENT
RECOMMENDATION
PLANNING DIRECTOR INITIATED
THOMAS WINEGAR AND SUSAN FURCHGOTT
REPEAL CHANGE OF ZONE ORDINANCE NO. 12-132 (PL-PDI-2024-000005)
Upon careful review of the request, the Planning Director recommends that the Planning
Commission forward a favorable recommendation to the Hawaii County Council on this
request to repeal Ordinance No. 12-132, which will revert the current zoning of the subject
property from Multiple-Family Residential-3,000 square feet (RM-3) to its original Single-
Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10) zoning district for approximately 0.9793 acres of
land. Since this recommendation is made without the benefit of public testimony, the Director
reserves the right to modify and/or alter the recommendation. This favorable recommendation is
based on the following findings:
The Planning Director is initiating a repeal of Ordinance No. 12-132 in response
to a written request, dated October 31, 2023, submitted by the property owners Thomas
Winegar and Susan Furchgott. The repeal would revert the zoning of approximately
0.9793 acres of land to its original Single-Family Residential-10,000 square feet (RS-10)
zoning designation from the current Multiple-Family Residential-3,000 square feet (RM-
3) zoning designation.
The subject property was rezoned from RS-10 to RM-3 with the objective of
constructing a multifamily student housing complex. Condition B (time to complete
construction) of Ordinance No. 12-132 required compliance by October 25, 2017, or five
years from the effective date of the subject ordinance. The applicants obtained Final Plan
Approval, on January 23, 2015, and a building permit was issued, on October 24, 2017,
for a 3-unit student apartment building. Additionally, pursuant to Condition L, the
applicants remitted a fair share contribution in the amount of$23,710.05, per a June 26,
2014, letter from the Planning Department,which will be reimbursed.
However, according to the applicants, the project was unsuccessful due to
construction costs being higher than anticipated, including installation of a costly
wastewater treatment system as the full scope of the project could not be served by septic
tanks. The closest County sewer line is located along Kawili Street, about 1,100 feet
south of the subject property. Although no administrative time extension was issued, even
with this option, Compliance with Condition B (time to complete construction) would
have lapsed on October 25, 2022. In 2023, the applicants requested to void the building
permit and repeal the change of zone.
As the landowners have no intention of developing any uses permitted in the RM-
3 zoning district, they are requesting that the Planning Director initiate rezoning of the
property to its original RS-10 zoning, pursuant to Condition P of the subject ordinance,
which allows the Director to initiate reversion of land to its original zoning or rezone to a
more appropriate designation should conditions of approval not be met or substantially
complied with in a timely fashion.
Since the subject parcel was rezoned, there have not been any significant land use
regulatory changes in this area. The proposed reversion to the original RS-10 zoning
would be consistent with the General Plan's Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide
(LUPAG) map Medium Density Urban Designation, which allows for a "village and
neighborhood commercial and single family and multiple family residential and related
functions (multiple family residential up to 35 units per acre). The State Land Use
designation for the subject property is Urban. The Hilo Community Development Plan
(CDP), adopted in 1975, suggests residential uses in this area.
The subject parcel is not situated within the Special Management Area and the
area has been extensively developed. Additionally, there are no known
archaeological, historical, or cultural resources and no protected/endangered floral or
faunal resources found on the subject parcel.
Immediately surrounding properties are almost entirely zoned Single-Family
Residential-10,000 square feet(RS-10), with residential uses. An adjacent property to the
northeast is zoned Multiple-Family Residential-4,000 square feet (RM-4) and developed
with a duplex. Given the preceding, reverting to the RS zoning district will be consistent
with surrounding land uses and zoning.
All infrastructure, which consists of roadway access, water, wastewater, solid
waste, and utilities and services, are adequate to support the RS-10 zoning district.
-2-
Lastly, although the recommendation to repeal Ordinance No. 12-132 will
extinguish any conditions related to the RM-3 zoning, it is made with the understanding
that the landowners remain responsible for developing the parcel in compliance with all
other applicable governmental requirements in connection with the Single-Family
Residential (RS) zoning district prior to its commencement or establishment upon the
subject property. Additional governmental requirements may include the issuance of
building permits, compliance with County Streets, Water, Sewer and Fire Code,
installation of improvements required by the American with Disabilities Act (ADA),
among others. Compliance with all applicable governmental requirements is a condition
of this approval; failure to comply with such requirements will be considered a
violation that may result in enforcement action by the Planning Department and/or the
affected agencies.
Based on the preceding findings, a favorable recommendation of the Planning Director's
initiated action to repeal Change of Zone Ordinance No. 12-132 and reclassify lands from
Multiple-Family Residential-3,000 square feet (RM-3) to Single-Family Residential-10,000
square feet (RS-10) would result in an appropriate land use pattern and would be in the best
interest of the general public.
The accompanying draft bill to amend Section 25-8-33 (City of Hilo Zone Map), Article
8, Chapter 25 (Zoning Code) of the Hawaii County Code, is provided for your favorable
consideration. Please note as this draft ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 12-132 and reverts the
subject property back to its original RS-10 zoning district, there are no proposed conditions to be
attached to this draft bill.
-3-