Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-09-26 PL-INT-2024-008818 GP 2045 Draft Comments - M. Cummings DeVera, Ashley From: Millicent Cummings < Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2024 8:51 AM To: Planning General Plan Subject: Testimony regarding the County of Hawai'i General Plan 2045 Attachments: Millicent's Testimony for the Planning Commission.pdf To: Hawai'i County Planning Department From: Millicent Cummings, Hilo Resident September 26, 2024 Whereas, Any official document, particularly a final draft like the County of Hawai'i General Plan 2045, 'Planning for a Sustainable Future' herein referred to as 'the plan', presented to its constituents for review with so many typos, undefined routes to achieve stated objectives and verifiably false assertions and vagaries will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any plan that intends on increasing taxations, fines, restrictions, limitations on freedoms to travel or any other Constitutionally protected rights will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any discussion of future planning and development for Moku 0 Keawe based on the nefarious and unconstitutional premises of Agenda 21, 30 or 45 or any related agendas being dictated to our County by the unelected officials of the World Economic Forum or the United Nations or any other such entity will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The means by which the lofty ideals presented in the plan are undefined and essentially identical to plans throughout the United States with suspicious terms like on-site affordable and workforce units, cluster, stakeholder, buffer zones, change codes, smart cities, urban renewal, etc. rendering said means incapable of addressing our site specific needs through such a cookie cutter, one size fits all planning process and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any document that is intended to "Incentivize the highest and best use of productive Agricultural Lands" without being painstakingly specific as to what that means and in whose best interest the Planning Commission is referring and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The plan is disingenuous when stating its intention to "Continuously engage residents and stakeholders in the decisionmaking process" when at no time were the "stakeholders" specified or the residents engaged in the process of forming such 'Climate Change' based plans and so will be therefore rejected. Whereas, i The word homeowner is never mentioned while the word stakeholder is mentioned several dozen times leading your constituents to question the intentions behind the proposed overreaching transferences of Public Trust resources into undisclosed 'Government and Non-government' agencies and so will be therefore rejected. Whereas, It is unconstitutional and a colossal misuse of tax payer's money to suggest "Retrofitting or relocating bridges and roads (As it) provides an opportunity to reduce GHG emissions by reducing miles traveled" without stating who exactly will be determining how many miles your constituents may travel which is an outrage and where they may travel thus betraying your oaths to uphold, protect, preserve and defend the Constitutions of the United States of America and the State of Hawai'i and so will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The plan intends to "Reduce the threat to life and property from natural hazards and disasters" without mentioning or working towards the prevention of non-natural disasters as well like the 300 plus fires that have resulted from military training at PTA and other deadly pollution, illegal water diversions contributing to the devastating Lahaina Fires and others, the high costs to our environment/food supply/residents/visitors by relentless human and environmental experimentation without consent here in the world's capital of endangered species like the recent introduction of yet another invasive species of Wolbachia Mosquitos, PGV's reckless drilling and other verifiably dangerous and detrimental experiments, the use of bioweapons, medical or otherwise and so many other non-natural disasters not mentioned here and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, For the Plan to "Require all County Departments to collaborate with the County Office of Sustainability, Climate, Equity, and Resilience (OSCER) as the lead agency to ensure the integration of the County's goals of sustainability, climate resilience, and equity into all county operations and planning initiatives" without a clear definition regarding OSCER's powers and authority, who will oversee that authority which your constituents have not yet granted approval for and what exactly do all these buzzwords mean in practical terms rendering the validity of this requirement null and void and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The CPTED is an unwelcome aspect of proposed SMART CITIES that would surveil, curtail, control and record its inhabitants beyond lawful right or conscience as offshoots of Agenda 21/30/45 in concert with the dictates of non elected officials in both the World Economic Forum and the United Nations and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The Plan's intention to "Increase the use of Smart Growth principles to focus development within designated urban centers" without a sound footing as to the possibly illegal and/or detrimental implication of such growth, based on the unscientific and highly debatable premise of the Climate Change narrative and related narratives is unacceptable and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, 2 Climate Change has not been publicly discussed or debated here in Hawaii County which would necessarily require town hall presentations and debates allowing the required time to review All available scientific data to evaluate in order to make any decisions whatsoever in its regard so until your constituents have been given a proper platform for said discussions to better educate their representatives and related agencies who are lacking in this department, the plan will be therefore rejected. Whereas, I am not in point of fact a climate change denier being educated about the fact that the climate has always been changing, is changing now and will always be changing and so rebuke any such accusations or labels as 'Climate change denier' or 'Conspiracy theorist' aimed at dismissing or silencing my valid concerns, especially given this tactic's illustrious history often resulting in increased governmental overreach, censorship and the centralization of power out of the hands of the People who pay the Planning Commission and all governmental bodies to protect them and so will be therefore rejected. Whereas, If this plan is based on the before mentioned premise of alleged climate change due to fossil fuel consumption which is thus far hearsay, it would therefore logically necessitate the Planning Commission to first, reduce the amount of said pollution by reducing the amount it presently allows and even facilitates by the world's number one polluter, the United States Military before proposing to limit the rights of minuscule offenders, your constituents if in fact the concern for the health and safety of Hawai'i and Her residents, visitors, land, air, water, sea and food supply is genuine so until such efforts are made a priority to mitigate all other main offenders/polluters of our Aina and ourselves, the plan will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any document that shows such blatant disregard for the clearly defined parameters and duties within our Hawai'i County Charter for All government employees who are all beholden to it by oath will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The plan does not reflect the dire needs of this community nor its aspirations or God given rights but rather, the Planning Commission's affiliation with UN, WHO, WEF and outside corporate interests whose intentions are bent on global governance in a 'Pact for the future' that is poised to over ride the sovereignty of the United States, the Hawaiian Kingdom and every country who submits to the dictates of these unelected officials operating outside their jurisdiction and standing in direct opposition to the real needs, real priorities and real rights of your constituents and will be therefore rejected. Mahalo for your consideration, Millicent Cummings 3 To: Hawai'i County Planning Department From: Millicent Cummings, Hilo Resident September 26, 2024 Whereas, Any official document, particularly a final draft like the County of Hawai'i General Plan 2045, `Planning for a Sustainable Future' herein referred to as 'the plan', presented to its constituents for review with so many typos, undefined routes to achieve stated objectives and verifiably false assertions and vagaries will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any plan that intends on increasing taxations, fines, restrictions, limitations on freedoms to travel or any other Constitutionally protected rights will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any discussion of future planning and development for Moku 0 Keawe based on the nefarious and unconstitutional premises of Agenda 21, 30 or 45 or any related agendas being dictated to our County by the unelected officials of the World Economic Forum or the United Nations or any other such entity will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The means by which the lofty ideals presented in the plan are undefined and essentially identical to plans throughout the United States with suspicious terms like on-site affordable and workforce units, cluster, stakeholder, buffer zones, change codes, smart cities, urban renewal, etc. rendering said means incapable of addressing our site specific needs through such a cookie cutter, one size fits all planning process and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any document that is intended to "Incentivize the highest and best use of productive Agricultural Lands" without being painstakingly specific as to what that means and in whose best interest the Planning Commission is referring and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The plan is disingenuous when stating its intention to "Continuously engage residents and stakeholders in the decisionmaking process" when at no time were the "stakeholders" specified or the residents engaged in the process of forming such `Climate Change' based plans and so will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The word homeowner is never mentioned while the word stakeholder is mentioned several dozen times leading your constituents to question the intentions behind the proposed overreaching transferences of Public Trust resources into undisclosed `Government and Non-government' agencies and so will be therefore rejected. 1 Whereas, It is unconstitutional and a colossal misuse of tax payer's money to suggest "Retrofitting or relocating bridges and roads (As it) provides an opportunity to reduce GHG emissions by reducing miles traveled" without stating who exactly will be determining how many miles your constituents may travel which is an outrage and where they may travel thus betraying your oaths to uphold, protect, preserve and defend the Constitutions of the United States of America and the State of Hawai'i and so will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The plan intends to "Reduce the threat to life and property from natural hazards and disasters" without mentioning or working towards the prevention of non-natural disasters as well like the 300 plus fires that have resulted from military training at PTA and other deadly pollution, illegal water diversions contributing to the devastating Lahaina Fires and others, the high costs to our environment/food supply/residents/visitors by relentless human and environmental experimentation without consent here in the world's capital of endangered species like the recent introduction of yet another invasive species of Wolbachia Mosquitos, PGV's reckless drilling and other verifiably dangerous and detrimental experiments, the use of bioweapons, medical or otherwise and so many other non-natural disasters not mentioned here and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, For the Plan to "Require all County Departments to collaborate with the County Office of Sustainability, Climate, Equity, and Resilience (OSCER) as the lead agency to ensure the integration of the County's goals of sustainability, climate resilience, and equity into all county operations and planning initiatives" without a clear definition regarding OSCER's powers and authority, who will oversee that authority which your constituents have not yet granted approval for and what exactly do all these buzzwords mean in practical terms rendering the validity of this requirement null and void and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The CPTED is an unwelcome aspect of proposed SMART CITIES that would surveil, curtail, control and record its inhabitants beyond lawful right or conscience as offshoots of Agenda 21/30/45 in concert with the dictates of non elected officials in both the World Economic Forum and the United Nations and will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The Plan's intention to "Increase the use of Smart Growth principles to focus development within designated urban centers" without a sound footing as to the possibly illegal and/or detrimental implication of such growth, based on the unscientific and highly debatable premise of the Climate Change narrative and related narratives is unacceptable and will be therefore rejected. 2 Whereas, Climate Change has not been publicly discussed or debated here in Hawaii County which would necessarily require town hall presentations and debates allowing the required time to review All available scientific data to evaluate in order to make any decisions whatsoever in its regard so until your constituents have been given a proper platform for said discussions to better educate their representatives and related agencies who are lacking in this department, the plan will be therefore rejected. Whereas, I am not in point of fact a climate change denier being educated about the fact that the climate has always been changing, is changing now and will always be changing and so rebuke any such accusations or labels as `Climate change denier' or `Conspiracy theorist' aimed at dismissing or silencing my valid concerns, especially given this tactic's illustrious history often resulting in increased governmental overreach, censorship and the centralization of power out of the hands of the People who pay the Planning Commission and all governmental bodies to protect them and so will be therefore rejected. Whereas, If this plan is based on the before mentioned premise of alleged climate change due to fossil fuel consumption which is thus far hearsay, it would therefore logically necessitate the Planning Commission to first, reduce the amount of said pollution by reducing the amount it presently allows and even facilitates by the world's number one polluter, the United States Military before proposing to limit the rights of minuscule offenders, your constituents if in fact the concern for the health and safety of Hawai'i and Her residents, visitors, land, air, water, sea and food supply is genuine so until such efforts are made a priority to mitigate all other main offenders/polluters of our Aina and ourselves, the plan will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any document that shows such blatant disregard for the clearly defined parameters and duties within our Hawai'i County Charter for All government employees who are all beholden to it by oath will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The plan does not reflect the dire needs of this community nor its aspirations or God given rights but rather, the Planning Commission's affiliation with UN, WHO, WEF and outside corporate interests whose intentions are bent on global governance in a 'Pact for the future' that is poised to over ride the sovereignty of the United States, the Hawaiian Kingdom and every country who submits to the dictates of these unelected officials operating outside their jurisdiction and standing in direct opposition to the real needs, real priorities and real rights of your constituents and will be therefore rejected. Mahalo for your consideration, Millicent Cummings 3