HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-09-26 PL-INT-2024-008852 GP 2045 Draft Comments - M. Moore DeVera, Ashley
From: Jasper Moore <
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2024 11:47 PM
To: Planning General Plan
Subject: Objection to the General Plan 2045
Aloha to the Planning Director and the team behind the General Plan Consultation,
Having seen the re-zoning that you folks are pushing forward without adequate 'agreement' from the
residents of this island I am very concerned that you've overstepped your authority.
These kinds of actions on your part(because they can lead to property appropriation) can be construed
as being an 'accomplice' to fraud and or property theft.
Which leads us all to another pretty obvious conclusion: that you haven't created this document to
reflect the actual concerns of our island communities.
That conclusion is further supported by all the woke 'garbage' jargon words. The word Stakeholder is
used and we never see private property owner. (Why not?) Sustainability is mentioned over and over and
yet no real 'plan' seems in place to support and build the economy. Plenty of costs are predicted for
infrastructure though and 'private public partnerships' are mentioned many times. That is just a fancy
way for you to describe the way you plan on creating a lot of debt and giving away valuable assets to
corporations. This is definitely not a way to build up our economy.
I really object to the whole Document as it is written with way too much emphasis on 'climate change.' I
think that you all should stop suggesting that Carbon is 'causing' climate change without providing data
showing this to be irrefutable fact. Over 1000 independent scientists have protested the Climate Change
as myth and I believe that Climate Change is being used as an excuse to control people and appropriate
public and private assets. The entire document appears to have been taking directives from Bill Gates
and World Economic Forum and other 'un elected' bodies who are seeking dominance over national and
local policies. The Office of Sustainability Carbon Equity and Resilience is providing a backdoor for these
agencies to control our County laws and policies. It actually states in your plan that OSCER should
direct the policies of 'all departments.' Why should we think that is a good thing? It doesn't even seem
legal to place a single department above the legislature and the executive branch.
The consultation itself has been terrible. I live in Hilo and no-one can explain why Hilo is not even in this
plan. When it came time to invite comments in Hilo you all scheduled it when I was at work(2pm on a
weekday).
This is the credibility problem you have going forward. I don't think you should continue to present this
document as if it comes from the community or is of benefit to us. Not too many people in the County
know about this plan so far but there will be way more people upset about what you are promoting.
Whomever is involved should probably think about resigning. I wanted to like this plan but I can't say
anything good about it. and I don't consider that there are edits you can make to correct this at this point.
There has been a loss of public trust in the process you promoted as being a 'consultation.' I believe the
entire document needs to be scrapped and the process begun again but this time taking into account the
real concerns of our communities which are very different to the priorities written into this document.
Yours
Michael. J Moore
Hilo
2