Laserfiche WebLink
<br />From:dciresearch@protonmail.com <br />To:WPCtestimony <br />Subject:Testimony On Hawaii General Plan 2045 (New Biz) <br />Date:Monday, October 28, 2024 9:28:18 AM <br />Testimony to model (change as you'd like): <br /> <br />This General Plan needs to be thrown out and redone! <br /> <br />Here are a some reasons why: <br />It is too vague. The language is not clear what the plan wishes to accomplish. There are <br />MANY concerning sections that sound like rights, freedoms, and property are at risk with <br />this plan. <br />Page 111, section 17.4: "Land use application shall identify as early as possible any <br />existing or potential active living corridors that should be incorporated into the counties <br />open space network." This sounds like you'll be looking at people's property to take for open <br />space because they apply for land use. That is not Pono and is an invasion of privacy! <br />2.2 Biocultural Stewardship Goal (1.13): "Incentive private land management practices that <br />enhance natural resources and values and when appropriate pursue the acquisitions of <br />lands for the protections of natural resources." We've seen your incentives like the tax <br />incentives on Maui, which is costing people thousands if they don't do what the government <br />wants. You want to acquire land to protect natural resources and values. Who gets to <br />decide what are natural resources and values? Whose values are they? Why do you think <br />it's your right to "pursue" acquiring someone's private property?!! <br />You have an entire section on climate change that looks to take away many freedoms and <br />rights. Did you know there are close to 2K credentialed scientists from around the world that <br />state there is no climate danger? https://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/ The reason for <br />this narrative is the change these policies will create will increase the pocket book of <br />investors in renewable energy as it reduces freedoms for the general population. <br />Page 116, 19.7: "Concurrency reviews should incorporate reduction in vehicle miles <br />traveled to mitigate traffic impacts and achieve sustainability and demand management <br />goals." The Constitution says we have the right to travel! It is not the right of the Planning <br />department to "demand" that your management goals reduce that right! Anything that reads, <br />"Reduce vehicle miles traveled" should be removed from this plan! <br />Please take a look at this pdf that shares a lot more issues with this general plan. <br />https://www.standtogetherhawaii.com/_files/ugd/86fc0c_b34739e4c99c461685de4c0207bf286e.pdf <br /> <br />This General Plan must be redone with the people and the feature keiki in mind, which this plan <br />does not do! <br /> <br />Jeff Detrick <br />Sent with Proton Mail secure email. <br />