The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPD Background Report PL-USE-2024-0000029 1 BCrownCastleUSE.10/15/24 COUNTY OF HAWAI‘I PLANNING DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND REPORT CROWN CASTLE USE PERMIT APPLICATION (PL-USE-2024-000029) CROWN CASTLE is requesting a Use Permit to replace an existing 73-foot, 6-inch-tall wood pole telecommunication tower with a new 73-foot, 6-inch-tall steel monopole and equipment compound within an 872-square foot portion of a larger 23.651-acre parcel. The subject property is located at 73-4310 Huehue Street on the west side of Huehue Street, approximately 0.59 miles north of its intersection with Kaloko Drive, Kaloko, North Kona, Hawaiʻi, TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003(por.). APPLICANT’S REQUEST 1. Proposed Use: The applicant, Crown Castle, is seeking a Use Permit to allow the construction of a new 73-foot, 6-inch-tall steel monopole on an 872-square foot portion of a larger 23.651-acre parcel. The facility will also include 4 panel antennas, 4 remote radio heads, and 2 hybrid cables attached to the pole, with 1 new site support cabinet, 1 battery cabinet, and 1 Alternative Access Vendor cabinet at ground-level. The applicant also proposes to remove one 73-foot, 6-inch-tall wood pole, one baseband unit (BBU) cabinet, two remote radio units (RRU), two remote radio units, and two triplexers. Three (3) proposed equipment cabinets will be installed on three existing concrete pads. The four (4) additional antennas will be added at a top height of 75 feet. Ground disturbance will be limited to the installation of the new steel monopole within the existing 30-foot by 29-foot fenced compound lease area for the wireless communication facility. The tower will be constructed of structural galvanized steel and built to withstand a 174-mph wind load and will have the ability to accommodate other carriers. This new tower will replace the existing 73-foot, 6-inch-tall wood telecommunication pole, which was constructed in 1997 but is now structurally deficient to accommodate equipment upgrades. The applicant is requesting approval to upgrade the existing tower with one that does not substantially change the physical dimensions of such tower or base station. The proposed facility would be unmanned, and maintenance and repair activities will be performed by a technician on a periodic basis. 2 2. Reason for the Request: According to the applicant, their tenant T-Mobile has been operating from this facility and desires to upgrade their equipment. The physical condition of the existing tower is poor and will not support the tenant’s requirements for equipment upgrade. Moreover, the existing pole is made of wood and is over twenty-five years old. Age and environmental conditions make the pole incapable of structurally supporting the equipment needed to provide improved wireless services in the surrounding area. The objective of this project is to provide stronger wireless infrastructure to serve the surrounding community. This would mean improved coverage and service quality within Kaloko Mauka and Kalaoa. This would also allow a better signal hand-off to existing facilities located along Highways 11 and 19. 3. Co-location: While the existing tower consists of one anchor tenant (T-Mobile), the proposed replacement tower will allow the potential for future co-location by other carriers. 4. Tower Height Justification: T-Mobile currently operates a wireless facility at the subject location with antennas at a height of 73 feet and 64 feet on Crown Castle’s existing 73-foot, 6-inch-tall wood pole tower. With the replacement of the existing pole with the proposed 73-foot, 6-inch-tall steel monopole, T-Mobile’s upgraded antennas will reach an overall height of 75 feet. The height will allow clean handoff of signals to and from nearby existing T-Mobile telecommunication sites. 5. Supportive Information: The applicant has submitted the attached in support of the request: (Planning Department Exhibit 1 – Use Permit Application dated September 12, 2024) 6. Landowner: Vannoy Jones Trust. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 7. Telecommunications Act of 1996: The Telecommunications Act of 1996, Section 704, as amended, recognizes the absence of health hazards from wireless radio wave transmissions and prohibits local authorities from regulating the placement of such towers based on environmental effects, so long as the towers comply with the Federal Communication Commission’s (FCC) guidelines. The applicant and subsequent tenant telecommunication service providers will comply with all Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rules. 3 8. Plan Approval: The facility was initially developed by Western PCS II Corporation, which is now T-Mobile and received Plan Approval from the Planning Department on April 2, 1997. Pursuant to Section 25-4-61(a) of the Hawaiʻi County Code, the existing facility is considered a nonconforming use. Building permit A2021-BH00422 was issued and completed on August 29, 2022 for the “as-built” construction of a telecommunication facility. 9. Historical Background: Prior to 2007, Hawaiʻi County required a Special Permit for the construction and operation of wireless communication antennas and towers in the State Land Use Agricultural District. However, in 2007, the Hawai’i State Legislature adopted Act 171, allowing wireless communication antennas and towers as a permitted use in the State Land Use Agricultural District with no Special Permit required by the County Planning Commission. In response, in 2010, the Hawai’i County Council adopted Ordinance 10-17, which allows a telecommunication antenna or tower in the County Agricultural district if a Use Permit is first granted by the County Planning Commission. Per the County of Hawaiʻi’s response to a Request for Zoning Verification dated June 13, 2013, (Planning Department Exhibit 2 – Letter dated June 13, 2023), the replacement of the existing telecommunication pole and its support facility would require the issuance of a Use Permit from the Planning Commission. STATE AND COUNTY PLANS 10. State Land Use District: Agricultural. 11. General Plan LUPAG Map Designation: Extensive Agriculture. 12. County Zoning: Agricultural-20 acres (A-20a). 13. Special Management Area: The subject parcel is approximately 8 miles from the nearest shoreline and is not situated within the Special Management Area. 14. Kona Community Development Plan (KCDP): The KCDP, originally adopted by the Hawai‘i County Council on September 25, 2008, and most recently amended on September 18, 2019, identifies the preferred land use pattern for the Kona districts. The subject property is located outside of the Kona Urban Area and outside of any Rural Town Areas. 4 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING AREA 15. Description of Property and Permit Area: The subject, 23.651-acre parcel is situated at the mauka end of the Kaloko Mauka Subdivision at an elevation of approximately 4,500 feet. The property is improved with the existing telecommunication facility within an 872-square foot permit area located on the northeast part of the parcel. The existing facility is enclosed by a 6-foot-tall chain link fence with locked gates to control access to the facility. The existing telecommunication site has been completely disturbed and graded during the original construction. Finally, there is a single-family residence located near the parcel’s north boundary line, approximately 424 feet northwest of the permit area and three apparent agricultural structures approximately 563 feet to the south. 16. Surrounding Zoning/Land Uses: Properties situated immediately to the north, south, east, and west are zoned Agricultural (A-20a). The subject property is located within the Kaloko Mauka Subdivision. The Puʻu Waʻawaʻa Forest Bird Sanctuary is located to the east of the subject property, and the immediate surrounding properties are characterized as forested areas with scattered farm dwellings and some agricultural uses. 17. Flood Zone: Zone “X”, which is determined to be an area of minimal flood hazard. 18. Agricultural Lands of Importance to the State of Hawaiʻi (ALISH): Unclassified. 19. Land Study Bureau’s Detailed Land Classification System: “E” or “Very Poor” soils. 20. U.S.D.A. Soil Survey: Puna-Lava flows complex, 10 to 20 percent slopes. 21. Flora and Fauna Resources: The parcel is vegetated with grass and a sparse grove of 50-foot-tall trees. The project area is covered with grass and bushes in an undeveloped portion of the parcel. No rare or endangered species of flora and fauna were found at the proposed telecommunication site. While the application does not reference any listed or endangered animal species, the surrounding area includes the Puʻu Waʻawaʻa Forest Bird Sanctuary that may be home to species such as the Hawaiian Owl (Pueo), Hawaiian Hawk (ʻIo), Hawaiian Honeycreepers (Iʻiwi and ʻApapane), Hawaiian Goose (Nēnē), and the Hawaiian Hoary Bat (ʻŌpeʻapeʻa). The US Wish and Wildlife Service provides best management practices for minimizing project impacts to these species which can be found in their General Project Design Guidelines (10 Species). Additionally, the State Division of Forestry and Wildlife Division and College of Tropical Agriculture and 5 Human Resources have guidance on how to minimize impacts to these species and reduce the spread of Rapid Ohia Disease. 22. Archaeological/Historic/Cultural Resources: Cultural resources review, field inspection, and consultation with native Hawaiian organizations was completed in an Historic Properties Review and Assessment by ASM Affiliates and included in a report dated March 22, 2024. The report indicated that a 0.5-mile radius surrounding the area of potential effects (APE) was examined to identify potential visual impacts to historic properties based on the stipulations in the FCC Programmatic Agreement. The examination found that there are no sites that are eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places and/or on the Hawaiʻi Register of Historic Places. By letter dated May 17, 2024, the Department of Land and Natural Resources-State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD) and State Historic Preservation Officer’s (SHPO) concurred that no historic properties will be affected by the proposed project. 23. Public Access: There is no known designated public access to the mountain or shoreline that runs through the property. PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES 24. Roadway Access: Access to the facility will be off Kaloko Drive to Huehue Street to an existing, private gravel driveway on the subject property. Minimal traffic impact is expected once construction is completed, as service personnel will visit the site only on an as needed basis. 25. Water: Water is not required for the proposed use. 26. Wastewater: The proposed use will not generate wastewater. 27. Solid Waste: According to the State Department of Health (DOH), all solid waste and hazardous materials generated during construction must be properly disposed of at DOH- permitted solid waste management facilities. 28. Essential Utilities and Services: The essential utilities of electricity and telephone are available to the site. The nearest police and fire facilities are located in Kailua-Kona and Kealakehe, which is approximately 12 miles southwest of the site. AGENCY COMMENTS 29. State Department of Health: (Planning Department Exhibit 3 – October 18, 2024 Memo) 6 AGENCY - NO COMMENTS/CONCERNS 30. Police Department, Fire Department, Department of Land and Natural Resources-Land Division, and Department of Finance – Real Property Tax Division. AGENCY - NO RESPONSE 31. Hawaiʻi County Civil Defense Agency and Department of Public Works-Engineering Division. PUBLIC COMMENTS 32. There are no public comments to date on this application. USE PERMIT APPLICATION COUNTY OF HAWAIʻI PLANNING COMMISSION (Type or legibly print the requested information) APPLICANT(S): APPLICANT’S SIGNATURE: DATE: ADDRESS: LIST APPLICANT’S INTEREST (if not owner): PHONE: (Bus.) (Res.) (Email) REQUEST: TAX MAP KEY(S): ZONING: SIZE OF PROPERTY / AREA OF REQUESTED USE: LANDOWNER(S): FEE SIMPLE LANDOWNER(S) WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION (may be provided by letter with the below statement included): DATE: DATE: AGENT: AGENT ADDRESS: PHONE: (Bus.) (Res.) (Email) Please indicate to whom original correspondence and copies should be sent. ORIGINAL: COPIES: Network Connex on behalf of Crown Castle 9/12/2024 758 Kapahulu Avenue, Suite 100, #940, Honolulu, HI 96816 Crown Castle 916.640.6324 rkahalelehua@networkconnex.com Approval of a Use Permit to upgrade an existing telecommunications facility, to include the replacement of an existing 73'-6" wood pole with a new 73'-6" steel monopole, installation of (4) panel antennas, (4) radios, (2) hybrid cables on the pole, with (3) cabinets at ground level. All work will remain within existing 872 sf compound. (3) 7-3-048:003 A-20A 23.651 Acres 872 sf Vannoy Jones M TR Robyn Kahalelehua, Network Connex 758 Kapahulu Avenue, Suite 100, #940, Honolulu, HI 96816 916.640.6324 rkahalelehua@networkconnex.com Agent Agent 1 Department of Planning County of Hawaii Application for USE PERMIT for Proposed Upgrades to Existing Antenna Facility 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua Kona, HI 96740 TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 Prepared by: Robyn Kahalelehua, Network Connex Agent for Crown Castle 758 Kapahulu Ave., Suite 100, #940 Honolulu, HI 96816 Phone: 916.640.6324 Email: rkahalelehua@networkconnex.com 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 SUMMARY INFORMATION PAGE 3 SECTION 2 INTRODUCTION PAGE 4 SECTION 3 PROPERTY LOCATION PAGE 4 SECTION 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 5-6 SECTION 5 INFORMATION FOR TOWER APPLICATION PAGE 6-8 SECTION 6 INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS PAGE 8-9 SECTION 7 INFRASTRUTURE CONSIDERATIONS PAGE 9-10 SECTION 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS PAGE 10-11 SECTION 9 RATIONALE FOR ISSUANCE OF USE PERMIT PAGE 11-18 SECTION 10 CONCLUSION PAGE 18-19 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY LOCATION PAGE 20 EXHIBIT B STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PAGE 21 EXHIBIT C SITE PLANS PAGE 22 EXHIBIT D FAA NOTICE CRITERIA DETERMINATION PAGE 23 EXHIBIT E ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION PAGE 24 EXHIBIT F T-MOBILE COVERAGE MAP PAGE 25-28 EXHIBIT G HAWAII COUNTY LAND USE MAP PAGE 29 EXHIBIT H HAWAII COUNTY SMA MAP PAGE 30 EXHIBIT I ACCESS TO FACILITY PAGE 31 EXHIBIT J HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP PAGE 32 EXHIBIT K POLICE AND FIRE STATION MAPS PAGE 33 EXHIBIT L NORTH KONA NATURAL BEAUTY SITES PAGE 34 EXHIBIT M STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REPORT PAGE 35 3 SECTION 1 SUMMARY INFORMATION APPLICANT: CCTM1 LLC (“Crown Castle”) 94-1221 Ka Uka Blvd., Unit 108, #151 Waipahu, HI 96797 Contact: Kanoe Eiselin Phone: 808.277.4178 Email: Kanoe.Eiselin@CrownCastle.com AGENT: Network Connex 758 Kapahulu Ave., Suite 100, #940 Honolulu, HI 96816 Contact: Robyn Kahalelehua Phone: 916.640.6324 Email: RKahalelehua@NetworkConnex.com FEE OWNER: Vannoy Jones M TR 73-4310 Huehue St. Kailua Kona, HI 96740 SITE ADDRESS: 73-430 Huehue St. Kailua Kona, HI 96740 PARCEL NUMBER: (3) 7-3-048:003 LOT AREA: 23.651 Acres ZONING: Parcel A-20A STATE LAND USE: Agriculture SMA: No FLOOD ZONE: X 4 SECTION 2 INTRODUCTION CCTM1 LLC (“Crown Castle”), as the applicant, is requesting a Use Permit pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) section 205 and Hawaii County. Code Chapter 25-4-12 for the upgrade of an existing telecommunication facility. The project will include the replacement of an existing 73’-6” wood pole with a new 73’-6” steel monopole, on an approximately 872 square foot portion of a 23.651-acre lot located in Kaloko Mauka, North Kona District, TMK (3) 7-3-048:003. Crown Castle, the largest telecommunications tower owner and operator in the country, is a multi-tenant provider of wireless infrastructure. The existing wood pole allows for the colocation of one wireless service provider: T- Mobile. The new pole will allow for colocation of multiple wireless service providers. Antennas installed at the top of the new tower will extend the proposed structure to an overall height of 75’-3”. The parcel, TMK (3) 7-3-048:003, is owned by Vannoy Jones M TR. The parcel is located within the State Land Use Agricultural and zoned A-20A by the County of Hawaii. According to section 25-4-12 of the Hawaii County Zoning Code, this proposed use is permitted within the A-20A Zoned Districts with the approval of a Use Permit. In accordance with the above section of the Hawaii County Code, Crown Castle is requesting approval of a Use Permit to upgrade its existing telecommunication facility with a new pole and support equipment affixed to the pole and at ground level. SECTION 3 PROPERTY LOCATION The subject property is a 23.651-acre parcel and is located at 73-4310 Huehue St. Kailua Kona, HI 96740-8695, TMK (3) 7-3-048:003. The existing telecommunication facility is located on the northeast part of the parcel and occupies approximately 872 square feet of the parcel. There is a residence located near the parcel’s north boundary line. The property is zoned for A-20A and is not fully developed. The existing facility is enclosed by a 6’ chain link fence with locked gates to control access to the facility. The existing site has been completely disturbed and graded during the original construction. See Exhibit A, Property Location. The surrounding areas to the east, west, north and south are also zoned A-20A where several of the properties have been developed as residences. 5 SECTION 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant, Crown Castle, is seeking approval of a Use Permit pursuant to 25-4-12 of the Hawaii County Zoning Code for the project, which would allow for the replacement of an existing, 73’-6” wooden telecommunication pole, and its equipment with a new 73’-6” steel monopole. New equipment will include (4) panel antennas, (4) remote radio heads, and (2) hybrid cables attached to the pole, with (1) new 6160 site support cabinet, (1) B160 battery cabinet, and (1) AAV cabinet at ground-level. All proposed work will remain within the current compound footprint of approximately 872 square feet. The objective of this project is to provide stronger wireless infrastructure to serve the surrounding community. This would mean improved coverage and service quality within Kaloko Mauka and Kalaoa. This would also allow a better hand-off to existing facilities located along Highways 11 and 19. The existing pole is made of wood and is over twenty-five years old. Age and environmental conditions make the pole incapable of structurally supporting the equipment needed to provide improved wireless services in the surrounding area. The new tower will be made of galvanized steel and structurally much stronger. It will also allow for T-Mobile’s upgraded antenna equipment where the existing pole does not. The facility was originally developed by Western PCS II Corporation which is now T-Mobile. Plan Approval was issued in 1997. Pursuant to Section 25-4-61(a) of the HCC, the existing facility is considered a Nonconforming Use of the property. Prior to 2007, Hawaii County allowed the construction and operation of wireless communication antennas and towers on State Land Use Agricultural Districts lands with a Special Permit. In 2007, the Hawai’i State Legislature adopted Act 171, which allowed wireless communication antennas and towers to be permitted uses in the State Land Use Agricultural District with no Special Permit required by the County Planning Commission. In 2010, the Hawai’i County Council adopted Ordinance 10-17, which allows a telecommunication antenna or tower in the County Agricultural District if a Use Permit is first granted by the County Planning Commission. Per County of Hawai’i's response to Request for Zoning Verification dated June 13, 2013, the replacement of the pole and its support facility may require the issuance of a Use Permit from the Planning Commission. In 2012, the interest of the site was transferred to Crown Castle by T-Mobile as part of a large transaction of telecommunication facilities throughout the country. Currently, T-Mobile is the only colocator at the facility. In order for T-Mobile to provide enhanced services to the community, the proposed upgrade is required to support the equipment upgrades. The wood pole built in the late 1990’s was not designed to support the latest technology. It is vital for wireless carriers to continue to expand their infrastructure to meet customer demands as more customers rely on wireless services than land line telephones. This proposed upgrade will further support the Enhanced 911 system, which allows emergency services (fire, police, emergency medical, etc.) to locate a caller by 6 their telephone number. The proposed project will also increase the chance of the facility continuing to operate during a natural disaster. There will be no expansion of the existing compound footprint. All of the proposed improvements will remain within the compound. The project area includes existing concrete pads and a mix of rock and dirt. There are no long-term traffic impacts resulting from this project. Except during construction of the proposed upgrades, the operation of the site will continue to generate virtually no traffic, as it is an unmanned, self-operating telecommunication facility that requires very low maintenance. The tower will meet Hawaii County’s TIA/EIA222 REV H code for wind loading and adhere to all FAA and FCC regulations. Due to the distance from any airport, lighting of the pole is not required. SECTION 5 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER APPLICATIONS In accordance with the County of Hawaii Planning Commission, additional criteria and documentation must be addressed in the establishment of a telecommunication tower. SCHEMATIC PLAN FOR TOWER DEVELOPMENT ON THE BIG ISLAND Currently Crown Castle owns and operates 48 communication towers throughout the County of Hawaii. Crown Castle acquired most of these facilities through nationwide acquisitions, such as the acquisition of Verizon Wireless’ telecommunication facilities in 2001, T-Mobile facilities in 2012, and AT&T facilities in early 2014. In 2005 Global Signal, a competitor of Crown Castle, acquired all of Sprint’s facilities. A few years later in January of 2007, Crown Castle purchased Global Signal. Crown Castle has not established new telecommunication facilities in the County of Hawaii. However, the company has modified and replaced a few aging facilities to accommodate tenant upgrades and additional collocations; thereby minimizing the proliferation of new telecommunication towers on the island. SUBJECT SITE’S ROLE IN OVERALL PLAN The objective of this site is to provide the infrastructure necessary for increased wireless coverage and improved services throughout Kaloko Mauka and the surrounding communities as well as visitors and residents traveling along Hawaii Belt Road. The upgrade to the existing facility will allow for improved wireless service and increased coverage. This facility will continue to hand off wireless signals to existing facilities servicing Highways 11 and 19. 7 BUILDING PLANS All plans and specifications have been produced by state-licensed engineers at Engineered Tower Solutions and Ehresmann Engineering. Structural calculations and certificate of wind resistance for the proposed monopole are attached as Exhibit B, Structural Analysis. The site has been designed to meet Federal, State, and County building regulations, and construction and operation of the proposed facility will comply with Federal, State, and County rules and requirements. See Exhibit C, Site Plans. DESIGN PLAN The new proposed 73’-6” monopole is to be constructed of structural galvanized steel with concrete footings extending 20’-6” deep. The monopole is designed to accommodate panel antennas and ancillary equipment for T-Mobile’s equipment and future colocators. The fenced equipment compound will be at the foot of the monopole with an existing locking gate that prevents unauthorized access to the facility. The monopole will not be lighted. There is a 6’ tall chain link security fence with an entry gate. The antennas will be inaccessible due to the height of the tower. Hazard and identification signs will be installed as mandated by the FCC. Due to the isolated location of the tower away from the denser residential areas to the west, topography of the surrounding area, and existing tree line, the tower will not impair mauka or makai view planes. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION DETERMINATION Crown Castle will adhere to the Federal Aviation Administration rules governing antenna installation, maintenance, and safety to its facilities. The proposed tower monopole structure does not exceed notice criteria. See Exhibit D, FAA Notice Criteria Determination. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION REQUIREMENTS Registration with the FCC is not required for this monopole. However, all tenants will be responsible for complying with the radio frequency emission standards set by the FCC. See Exhibit E, Antenna Structure Registration. STATEMENT OF NON-INTERFERENCE The proposed use will not interfere with the County of Hawaii public safety radio system. COLOCATION The existing tower consists of one anchor tenant (T-Mobile), but the proposed replacement tower will allow for future colocation by other carriers. Future carrier’s tower equipment will be located at different heights on the structure to eliminate signal or equipment interference. FEASIBILITY OF USING EXISTING TOWERS Crown Castle owns and operates the existing 73’-6” wood pole with T-Mobile currently collocated as the anchor tenant. The Applicant proposes to remove the existing wood pole and T-Mobile’s existing tower equipment, and to install a new 73’-6” steel monopole 8 with T-Mobile’s updated tower equipment to be installed at the top. Because the wood pole and anchor tenant exist in this location, other nearby facilities were not considered for collocation. However, by replacing this wood pole with a steel monopole, Crown Castle eliminates the need to construction an additional telecommunication tower nearby to accommodate future colocators. Crown Castle has a long-term lease with the property owner. Current and future wireless tenants have or will have license agreements for collocation on this facility. JUSTIFICATION FOR HEIGHT T-Mobile currently operates a wireless facility at the subject location with antennas at 73’-0” and 64’-0” on Crown Castle’s existing 73’-6” wood pole. With the removal of this pole, and installation of Crown Castle’s 73’-6” steel monopole, T-Mobile’s upgraded antennas will reach an overall height of 75’-0”. This will allow T-Mobile to provide enhanced service quality and increase coverage area to the Kaloko Mauka and Kalaoa community. This facility will also improve coverage to parts of the Kailua Kona and the main highway through the area/Hwy 19 Belt Road which is well traveled by residents and tourists. The height will allow clean handoff of signals to and from nearby existing T-Mobile telecommunication sites. The monopole will meet the setback requirements of Section 25-4-12 of the Hawaii County Code because it is located within a large parcel. See Exhibit F, T-Mobile Coverage Map. LANDOWNER / COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT The Landlord is supportive of the project and will support the notification to the neighboring residents. As in accordance with procedures for filing a Use Permit request, all adjacent landowners within a 500-foot radius of the site shall be notified and provided with information on all application submittal and public hearing dates, as they are scheduled. A sign will be posted on the site preceding the public hearing date. SECTION 6 INSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATION STATE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION The State Land Use classification of the subject site is Agriculture. According to HRS Section 205-2 (b), Hawaii Administrative Rules section 15-15-01, and the referenced Hawaii County Code Section 25-4-12, telecommunication facilities are a permitted use within the A-20A District. See Exhibit G, Hawaii County Land Use Map. COUNTY GENERAL PLAN The County of Hawaii General Plan Land Use Pattern Allocation Guide Map Designates the subject area as an agricultural district. The General Plan describes A-20A district as “lands that are not capable of producing sustained, high agricultural yields without the intensive application of modern farming methods and technologies due to certain physical constraints such as soil composition, slope, machine till ability and climate." 9 COUNTY ZONING CODE The site of the proposed monopole, antennas and related structures is zoned Agriculture Twenty Acre (A-20A), by the County. Telecommunication sites are listed as a permitted use under Hawaii County Code, Chapter 25-4-12, with the approval of a Use Permit. SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA According to SMA Arc GIS Explorer Online Map, the proposed site location is located outside of the SMR and more than 8 miles from the coastline. Therefore, the County of Hawaii SMR rules do not apply. See Exhibit H, Hawaii County SMA Map. HAWAII REVISED STATUTES, CHAPTER 205A, COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT The subject property is located more than 8 miles from the shoreline. The proposed use of the subject property will not negatively impact recreational resources, visual resources to or from the shoreline, including access to and along the shoreline or coastal ecosystems. Therefore, no scenic or open space resources to the shoreline coastal view plane or coastal ecosystem will be negatively impacted by the proposed action. Please see Section 9 of this application for a more complete discussion of Chapter 205A objectives and compliance. The proposed project will not have any impact on access to the Coastal areas. ACCESS The subject property is accessible from main city roadways by going south on HI- 90/Hawaii Belt Road (Mamalahoa Hwy) then going southeast on Kaloko Drive until it ends, then turning north on Huehue Street. The site is accessed by entering a private gate off Huehue Street. Access from the public road to the facility will be via a private, graded access road on the Jones’ property. The subject property is situated around other agricultural zoned properties that include a mixture of undeveloped land, farms, and residences. No public access to these areas will be impacted by the proposed action. See Exhibit I, Access to Facility. HISTORIC DISTRICT The subject parcel is not located within any Historic District. No historic or cultural features will be impacted by the proposed action. See Exhibit J, Historic District Map. SECTION 7 INFRASTRUCTURE CONSIDERATION TRAFFIC/ACCESS The telecommunication site is accessible from a paved public road, Kaloko Drive to Huehue Street to an existing, private gravel driveway on Jones’ property. 10 The project site is on the north-east side of the partially developed parcel. With the exception of the construction period for the project, minimal traffic is generated by the site as visits occur approximately one to four times per month utilizing a van–type vehicle. There is an adequate area adjacent to the site for the vehicle to park during these visits. This is an unmanned facility that is self-monitored. The compound shall be locked and inaccessible to non-authorized personnel. WATER AVAILABILITY Water is not required for the telecommunication facility. SEWAGE DISPOSAL There is no requirement for sewage disposal by the telecommunication facility. UTILITIES Electrical and phone services are available from Hawaiian Electric and Hawaiian Telcom via existing overhead transmission lines along Huehue Street. FIRE/POLICE SERVICES Both services are currently available in the area. A fire station is located 12.9 miles away and Police services are located 12.5 miles away in Kailua-Kona. See Exhibit K, Police and Fire Station Map. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT Construction waste will be transported to the County’s land fill by the contractor. No household type waste is generated by the proposed use. Any green waste will be disposed of on-site. SECTION 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS SURROUNDING LAND USES The 23.651 acre, partially developed parcel TMK (3) 7-3-048:003 in Kaloko-Mauka subdivision is zoned for Agricultural use where residential and telecommunication facilities are approved uses provided a Use Permit is obtained for the latter. The nearest residence is approximately 440 feet away from the project site. The properties to the east, west, north, and south of this parcel are agricultural and residential in use. FLORA/FAUNA The parcel is vegetated with grass and a sparse grove of 50’ trees. The project area is covered with grass and bushes in an undeveloped portion of the parcel. No rare or endangered species of flora and fauna were found at the proposed telecommunication site. A letter seeking confirmation will be sent to the United States Department of Fish and Wildlife as part of the FCC NEPA process. 11 NATURAL BEAUTY OR ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES The County General Plan, Natural Beauty element does not list the subject property nor the immediate area as being an example of Natural Beauty. See Exhibit L, North Kona Natural Beauty Sites. ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES Based upon the May 30, 2024 consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office ("SHPO") in accordance with the Programmatic Agreement, and taking into consideration the views of interested persons, the facility DOES NOT AND WILL NOT affect districts, sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places. See Exhibit M, State Historic Preservation Office Report. CULTURAL AND HISTORIC RESOURCES No valued cultural, historical or natural resources exist on the subject property and no gathering is taking place. To the extent which traditional and customary native Hawaiian rights are exercised, the proposed action will not affect traditional Hawaiian rights, therefore no action is necessary to protect those rights. DRAINAGE According to the U.S. Corps of Engineer Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), the subject site is designated “X”, an area outside of the 500-year flood plain. SECTION 9 RATIONALE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A USE PERMIT The granting of the proposed use shall be consistent with the general purpose of the zoned district, the intent and purpose of the Zoning Code and the County General Plan: The purpose of the County A (agricultural) district is to provide for agricultural and very low density agriculturally based residential use, encompassing rural areas of good to marginal agricultural and grazing land, forest land, game habitats, and areas where urbanization is not found to be appropriate. In recognizing that lands within the agricultural districts might not be best suited for agricultural activities and yet classified as such, and in recognition that certain types of uses might not be strictly agricultural in nature, yet reasonable in such districts, the County has provided for the Use Permit process to allow certain unusual and reasonable uses within the Agricultural District. The subject property is situated within the County’s Agricultural-20-acre zoned district. The proposed upgrades would be situated on an approximately 872 square foot portion of the 23.651-acre parcel of land. The proposed use will take minimal lands 12 out of the agricultural inventory for this area and will not significantly affect the agricultural resources of the area. The proposed use will be confined to the existing 872 square foot portion of the subject property. No additional surrounding lands are to be developed. Furthermore, the subject parcel has limited agricultural potential. The General Plan LUPAG map classifies the property as Extensive Agricultural Lands rather than Important Agricultural Lands. The property is further classified “E” or “Very Poor” by the Land Study Bureau. No other agricultural uses are presently taking place, and no other agricultural pursuits will be impacted by the proposed action. The property is also not designated as Agricultural Lands of Importance by the ALISH map. Therefore, the approval of the subject request would be consistent with and not contrary to the objectives of the County Zoning Code. The Project is not contrary to the objectives sought to be accomplished by HRS Chapters 205, 205A, and the rules of the Land Use Commission. A. HRS CHAPTER 205 The granting of this request would align with the objectives of Chapter 205, Hawaii Revised Statues, as amended. The State Land Use Regulations are intended to preserve, protect, and encourage the development of lands in the State for those uses to which they are best suited in the interest of the public health and welfare of the people of the State of Hawaii. In the case of the Agricultural District, the intent is to preserve or keep lands of high agricultural potential in agricultural use. The proposed property is presently partially developed agricultural land with a residential structure. In recognizing that lands within agricultural districts might not be best suited for agricultural activities and yet classified as such, and in recognition that certain types of uses might not be strictly agricultural in nature, yet reasonable in such districts, the legislature has provided for the Use Permit process to allow certain unusual and reasonable uses within the Agricultural District. The subject property is situated within the county zoned “minimum building site of 20 acres” Agricultural district. The proposed telecommunication site would be situated on an approximately 872 square foot portion of the 23.651-acre parcel of land. The proposed use will take minimal lands out of the agricultural inventory for this area and will not significantly affect the agricultural resource of the area. The proposed use will be confined to the approximately 872 square foot portion of the subject property. The proposed telecommunication facility will provide wireless service to the Kaloko Mauka and Kalaoa community in addition to providing additional road coverage along Highways 11 and 19. The applicant shall be compliant with the County policy and will allow other wireless communication service providers to colocate. Increased growth in the wireless industry is being witnessed because of the convenient and cost-effective telecommunication services for both the consumers 13 and provider with minimal environmental impacts resulting from the wireless network. Wireless service is also part of the civil defense network for the County of Hawaii, permitting otherwise unavailable communications during emergencies when line disruptions could occur, or in areas not served by traditional telephone service. Hawaii has implemented the Enhanced 911 service, which increased public safety by requiring wireless telephone carriers to provide 911 and E911 capability. This service provides an accurate location for 911 calls made from a wireless phone. The approval of the subject request would be consistent with and not contrary to the objectives of the State Land Use Laws defined in Chapter 205. B. HRS CHAPTER 205A (COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT) HRS Chapter 205A is the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) for the State of Hawaii. All lands in the State, including the mountain tops, are in the coastal zone management area under HRS Section 205A-1. The objectives of the CZMA is “to preserve, protect, and where possible, to restore the natural resources of the coastal zone of Hawaii” by “maintaining, restoring, and enhancing the overall quality of the coastal zone environment, including, but not limited to, its amenities and aesthetic values, and to provide adequate public access to publicly owned or used beaches, recreation areas and national reserves” by controlling development within an area along the shoreline, the Special Management Area (SMA). In addition, the project is not contrary to the objectives of the CZMA as set out in HRS Section 205A-2. RECREATIONAL RESOURCES: Provide coastal recreational opportunities accessible to the public. This objective does not apply to land outside of the SMA nor to the applicant’s requirements for the Use Permit. Therefore, the project is not contrary to this objective. HISTORIC RESOURCES: Protect, preserve, and where desirable, restore those natural and manmade historic and prehistoric resources in the coastal zone management area that are significant in Hawaiian and American history and culture. Historic resources are discussed earlier in this application in Section 8. The State Historical Preservation Department. See Exhibit J, Historic District Map. SCENIC AND OPEN SPACE RESOURCES: Protect, preserve, and where desirable, restore or improve the quality of coastal scenic and opens space resources. Typically, no proposed utility facility or telecommunication pole completely avoids visual impacts without excessive expenses that prevent cost-effective delivery of the service. In this case, the property is located 14 approximately 8 miles from the nearest shoreline and the proposed action will not significantly impact any coastal view planes. COASTAL ECOSYSTEMS: Protect valuable coastal ecosystems, including reefs, from disruption and minimize adverse impacts on all coastal ecosystems. This objective does not apply to land outside of the SMA nor to applicant’s requirements for this Use Permit. Therefore, the project is not contrary to this project. ECONOMIC USES: Provide public or private facilities and improvements important to the State’s economy in suitable locations. The economic impacts of the proposed project are consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan as identified later in this application. Telecommunication services are a desired utility to support the economic sustenance of the community. COASTAL HAZARDS: Reduce hazard to life and property from tsunami, storm waves, stream flooding, erosion, subsidence, and pollution. This objective does not apply to land outside of the SMA nor to the applicant’s requirements for this Use Permit. The subject property is classified as Zone “X” on the FIRM. Therefore, this project is not contrary to this objective. MANAGING DEVELOPMENT: Improve the development review process, communication, and public participation in the management of coastal resources and hazards. This objective does not apply to land outside of the SMA nor to the applicant’s requirements for this Use Permit. Therefore, the project is not contrary to this objective. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: Stimulate public awareness, education, and participation in coastal management. This objective does not apply to land outside of the SMA nor to the applicant’s requirements for this Use Permit. Therefore, the project is not contrary to this objective. BEACH PROTECTION: Protect beaches for public use and recreation. This objective does not apply to land outside of the SMA nor to the applicant’s requirements for this Use Permit. Therefore, the project is not contrary to this objective. MARINE RESOURCES: Implement the State’s ocean resources management plan. 15 This objective does not apply to land outside of the SMA nor to the applicant’s requirements for this Use Permit. Therefore, the project is not contrary to this objective. C. LAND USE COMMISSION RULES: HAR section 15-15-01 states that the Land Use Commission’s Rules “Shall be liberally construed to preserve and encourage the development and preservation of lands in the State for those uses to which they are best suited in the interest of public health and welfare of the people of the State of Hawaii.” Based on the discussion above that addresses the objectives of HRS 205 and HRS 205A, the applicant believes the proposed project is not contrary to the objectives sought to be accomplished by the Land Use Commission Rules. Increased growth in the cellular industry is expected because of the convenience, cost effectiveness for the provider and consumer, and minimal environmental impacts resulting from the wireless network. Wireless service providers also provide service to the open ocean areas of the island where many commercial fishermen use mobile devices as their primary emergency communication system. Wireless service is also part of the civil defense network for the County of Hawaii, permitting otherwise unavailable communications during emergencies when line disruptions could occur, or in areas not served by traditional telephone service. Hawaii has implemented the Enhanced 911 service, which increased public safety by requiring wireless telephone carriers to provide 911 and E911 capability. This service provides an accurate location for 911 calls made from a wireless phone. The proposed use will not be contrary to the goals, policies and standards of the General Plan and other applicable document: The General Plan LUPAG map classifies the property as an Open Area. The proposed use would be consistent with this LUPAG designation. A. ECONOMIC GOALS: Provide residents with opportunities to improve their quality of life. • The County of Hawaii shall strive for diversity and stability in its economic system. • The County shall provide an economic environment which allows new, expanded or improved economic opportunities that are compatible with the County’s natural and social environment. ECONOMIC POLICIES • The County of Hawaii shall strive for diversification of its economy by strengthening existing industries and attracting new endeavors. 16 • The County of Hawaii shall encourage the research, development and implementation of advanced technologies and processes in existing and potential economic endeavors. ECONOMIC STANDARDS • The island of Hawaii should be development into a unique scientific and cultural model. The island should become a model of living where economic gains are in balance with social and physical amenities. • Development should be reviewed based on the total impact on the residents of the County, not only in terms of immediate short-run economic benefits. • New industries which provide favorable benefit-cost relationships to the people of the County should be encouraged. Benefit-cost relationships as used here include more than fiscal considerations. The proposed use will be consistent with Economic Element of the General Plan: B. LAND USE: Through the careful analysis and examination of past and present situation, the following goals, policies, and standards are set forth to physically plan the lands in the County in the best interest of the island’s residents. LAND USE GOALS: Designate and allocate land uses in appropriate proportions and mix and in keeping with the social, cultural, and physical environments of the County. The proposed will be consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. C. PUBLIC UTILITIES GOALS: Ensure that adequate, efficient, and dependable public utility services will be available to users. Maximize efficiency and economy in the provision of public utility services. PUBLIC UTILITIES POLICIES: Public utility facilities shall be designed so as to complement adjacent land uses and shall be operated so as to minimize pollution or disturbance. Provide utilities and service facilities which minimize total cost to the public and effectively service the needs of the community. Utility services shall be designed to minimize conflict with the natural environment and natural resources. The proposed use will be consistent with the Public Utilities Element of the General Plans. The granting of the proposed use shall not be materially detrimental to the public welfare nor cause substantial adverse impact to the community’s character or to surrounding properties. Crown Castle proposes the replacement of a telecommunication monopole to improve coverage and communication in the area without substantial alteration or change to the character of the land and its present uses. The Zoning Code and County Plan do not describe the impacts that must be considered in determining whether a proposed use adversely affects the 17 community’s character and surrounding properties. The applicant will discuss several of the potential impacts. The subject parcel is flag shaped and 23.651 acres in size. The property is zoned Agricultural (A-20A). There is a residence in addition to the existing telecommunication facility on the parcel. The proposed use of the subject property will not adversely affect the surrounding properties or their present uses. The operation of the cellular radio antennas has filter equipment and operates in FCC licensed radio frequency bands, between 700-2500 megahertz. The propagation pattern of the antennas is directed towards the horizon for maximum effectiveness and not downward, thus the radio frequency energy near the base of the tower is minimal. Reviews of available scientific literature by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) have been conducted. None of these agencies have identified harmful health effects associated with low power densities and the microwave frequency of the cellular radio transmissions. Furthermore, Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 332 (c), as amended) recognizes the absence of health hazards from cellular radio transmissions and accordingly prohibits local authorities from regulating the placement of cellular structures based on environmental effects as long as those towers comply with the Federal Communication Commission’s guidelines. The subject structure is so designed. The proposed monopole and its antennas will not interfere with the police radio band because they are on different frequency bands and all of the receiving devices have filter equipment. The police radio band is at the lower 450-megahertz wave band while the wireless technologies utilize the 700–2500-megahertz wave bands. While the microwave frequencies of police radio and some wireless service provider systems could be in the same range, the FCC will not assign the same specific frequencies to either the police department or the wireless service provider. Therefore, users of the proposed telecommunication tower should not interfere with the police department’s radio or microwave frequencies. The operation of the telecommunication tower does not generate noise or dust. There will be minimal noise and dust generation during the construction of the required improvements, but this will be mitigated by proper construction techniques, dust control, and limiting construction to daylight hours. All construction will be permitted and comply with all applicable governmental regulations. 18 Typically, no proposed utility facility or telecommunication site completely avoids visual impacts without excessive expenses that prevent cost-effective delivery of the service. In this case, the proposed telecommunication facility will be located more than 8 miles from the nearest shoreline and will not significantly impact any coastal view planes. The granting of the proposed use shall not reasonably burden public agencies to provide roads and streets, sewers, water, drainage, school improvements, and police and fire protection and other related infrastructure. The project site is currently serviced with electrical and telephone via overhead lines from Huehue Street which fronts the subject parcel. The project does not need a supply of water. The traffic to be generated by the proposed telecommunication tower is minimal with approximately four trips generated to the site per month. There are no floodways or drainage ways on the subject property, and it is designated by the FIRM map as Zone “X”. No wastewater improvements are required. All construction will meet the regulations and standards established by government agencies. No public expenditures for road, street, sewer, water, drainage or school improvement or increased police or fire protection are required. The project will not burden any public agency. The proposed use is an unusual and reasonable use of the land, which would not be contrary to the objectives sought to be accomplished by the Land Use Law, Rules and Regulations. Based on the above considerations, the applicant believes the proposed telecommunication monopole, antennas and related structures is an unusual and reasonable use of this land, which would not be contrary to the objectives sough to be accomplished by the State Land Use Law and Regulations. SECTION 10 CONCLUSION The relatively recent introduction of the wireless communication industry may qualify the proposed project as an unusual use of property. However, the proposed project is considered to be a reasonable use of land, as it will provide necessary telecommunication service without significant adverse impact. The proposed telecommunication facility will not greatly affect the purpose for which the land is designated. There will be minimal alteration to the landscape. 19 Crown Castle seeks to provide optimum service to its customers while working within the guidelines set by the County. The replacement of the existing structure will provide an opportunity for improved services and increased coverage without burdening public agencies or changing the character of the community. Therefore, Crown Castle respectfully requests your approval of a Use Permit. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] 20 EXHIBIT A PROPERTY LOCATION 21 EXHIBIT B STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS 22 EXHIBIT C SITE PLAN [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.4T-1REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/11/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022REV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION405/11/2023ASDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONASPROJECT DESCRIPTIONLOCATION MAPNO SCALESITE INFORMATIONCARRIER/APPLICANT:HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC808-329-3584ELECTRIC PROVIDER:HAWAIIAN TELCOM808-643-7788TELCO PROVIDER:GROUND ELEVATION:19.71737052-155.92304680UFACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FORHUMAN HABITATIONOCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:A.D.A. COMPLIANCE:MAP/PARCEL #:COUNTY OF HAWAIIJURISDICTION:730480030000KALOKO MAUKAHAWAIIAREA OF CONSTRUCTION:EXISTINGNAD83A-20APROPERTY OWNER:CROWN CASTLE2000 CORPORATE DRIVECANONSBURG, PA 15317TOWER OWNER:IIBTYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:4957.35 FT73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740JONES,VANNOY M TR73-4310 HUEHUE STKAILUA KONA, HI 96740 8695CROWN CASTLE USA INC.SITE NAME:LAT/LONG TYPE:LONGITUDE:LATITUDE:CURRENT ZONING:COUNTY:SITE ADDRESS:PROJECT TEAMA&E FIRM:CROWN CASTLEUSA INC. DISTRICTCONTACTS:150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 96734THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO ENHANCE BROADBANDCONNECTIVITY AND CAPACITY TO THE EXISTING ELIGIBLE WIRELESSFACILITY.TOWER SCOPE OF WORK:·REMOVE (4) ANTENNAS·REMOVE (2) TMAs·REMOVE (8) COAX CABLES (7/8")·INSTALL (4) ANTENNAS·INSTALL (4) RRHs·INSTALL (2) HYBRID CABLES (1-5/8")·INSTALL MOUNT MODIFICATIONS PER MOUNT ANALYSIS -CONDITIONAL PASSING REPORT ISSUED BY TRYLON DATED 02/07/2023GROUND SCOPE OF WORK:·REMOVE (1) WOOD POLE·REMOVE (1) BBU CABINET·REMOVE (2) RRUS11 B2 RRUs·REMOVE (2) RADIO 4449 B71+B85·REMOVE (2) TRIPLEXERS·INSTALL (1) 6160 SITE SUPPORT CABINET·INSTALL (1) B160 BATTERY CABINET·INSTALL (1) AAV CABINET·INSTALL (1) NEW STEEL MONOPOLE (BY EHRESMANN ENGINEERING)NOTE:PRIOR TO ACCESSING/ENTERING THE SITE YOU MUST CONTACT THECROWN NOC AT (800) 788-7011 & CROWN CONSTRUCTION MANAGER.T-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:T-MOBILE SITE NAME:SITE TYPE:TOWER HEIGHT:T-MOBILE PROJECT NAME:BUSINESS UNIT #:SITE ADDRESS:COUNTY:JURISDICTION:HI04193BKALOKO MAUKAMONOPOLE73'-6"ANCHOR/DRIP824947HAWAIICOUNTY OF HAWAII73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740SHEET #DRAWING INDEXSHEET DESCRIPTIONTITLE SHEETT-1OVERALL SITE PLANA-1EXISTING SITE PLANTOWER ELEVATIONSGENERAL NOTESGN-1ALL DRAWINGS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE FORMATTED FORFULL SIZE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS ANDEXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITEAND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER INWRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDINGWITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.ANTENNA PLANSPLUMBING DIAGRAMZONING INFO730480030000FRONT = 30'-0"SIDE = 20'-0"REAR = 30'-0"TMK:YARD SETBACKS:A-20AZONING DISTRICT:45'-0"HEIGHT LIMITZONE XFLOOD ZONEA-2A-3A-5A-8A-4E-1E-3ANTENNA GROUNDING DIAGRAMGROUNDING DETAILSZONE 4SEISMIC ZONE:SEE REFERENCE DOCUMENTSTOWER WINDLOAD:CALL HAWAII ONE CALL(800) 423-7287CALL 3 WORKING DAYSBEFORE YOU DIG!APPLICABLE CODES/REFERENCEDOCUMENTSALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BYTHE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BECONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES:CODE TYPECODEBUILDING2018 IBC W/ AMENDMENTSELECTRICAL2017 NEC W/ AMENDMENTSENERGY2018 IECC W/ AMENDMENTSFIRE PROTECTION2006 NFPA-1TOWER DESIGN:SEAL DATE:EHRESMANN ENGINEERING12/02/2022REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:MOUNT ANALYSIS:DATED:TRYLON02/07/2023RFDS REVISION:DATED:902/22/2023ORDER ID:REVISION:5783900T-MOBILE3375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 96819ERIC SCHATZ - MARKET MANAGER(808) 723-0005ERIC.SCHATZ@CROWNCASTLE.COMTROY BANTOLINA - CONSTRUCTION MANAGER(808) 479-4097TROY.BANTOLINA@CROWNCASTLE.COMOLEG GAPONOV - A&E SPECIALIST(206) 336-7416OLEG.GAPONOV@CROWNCASTLE.COMENGINEERED TOWER SOLUTIONS, PLLC3227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615CROWNAESERVICES@ETS-PLLC.COMEQUIPMENT DETAILSA-6FINAL SITE PLANEQUIPMENT DETAILSA-7E-2PANEL SCHEDULE AND ELECTRICALCONNECTION DIAGRAMADRIAN CATALAN - REAL ESTATE SPECIALIST(808) 358-5556ADRIAN.CATALAN@CROWNCASTLE.COME-4SITE ELECTRICAL PLANE-5SITE GROUNDING PLANKANOE EISELIN - PROJECT MANAGER(808) 277-4178KANOE.EISELIN@CROWNCASTLE.COM73'-6" MONOPOLEE01ATTACHED TOWER DESIGN DRAWINGS (BY EHRESMANNENGINEERING)73'-6" MONOPOLE MAP TYPE FOUNDATIONDESIGNE0273'-6" MONOPOLE PIER TYPE FOUNDATIONDESIGNE02ASTD TOWER & TOWER FOUNDATION NOTESN01H73'-6" MONOPOLE SPECIAL INSPECTIONSTATEMENTS1STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS:SEAL DATE:CROWN CASTLE02/27/2023 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3GN-1REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3GN-1REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-1REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-2REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.4A-3REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/11/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022REV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION405/11/2023ASDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONAS IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.4A-4REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/11/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022REV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION405/11/2023ASDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONAS IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.4A-5REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/11/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022REV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION405/11/2023ASDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONAS IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-6REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-7REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-8REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION Ehresmann EngineeringDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:ENG APPR.MFG APPR.Q.C.NAMETITLE:DWG. NO.SITE:JOB#SHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONDATEREV012345674400 West 31st StreetYankton, SD 57078605-665-7532605-665-9780DRAWING CREATEDRev. 011285073'-6" MONOPOLE112850E01E01824947 - KALOKOMAUKA, HITER11-14-22MAXIMUM BASE MOMENT & FORCESMOMENT(FT-KIPS) (KIPS)SHEAR(KIPS)AXIALPOLE DATA2347 40 21POLE_________KSI 18 SIDED65 ELEV. TOP DIA.BASE DIA.TAPER(16x) 1 3/4"Ø F1554 GRADE 105 KSI57"Ø, 1 3/4" THICK, ROUNDASTM A572 50 KSIBASE PLATE DATA:TEMPLATE O.D. = Ø55" A36ANCHOR BOLT DATA:X 6'-0" LG ON A 50"Ø BOLT CIRCLEFEEDLINESELEV. ITEM(16x) 3/8" THICK X 12" TALL GUSSETSASTM A572 65 KSI38-3" 21" 32 3/4"35'-3"- 73'-6" 1/4"NOTES:1. ORIENT V-NOTCH ON TOP OF TEMPLATE AND REFERENCETAB ON BASE PLATE @ 0°.2. STAMP "EE 112850" ON TOP OF BASE PLATE (NEAR NORTHTAB) WITH 1/2” STEEL STAMPS.LATITUDE: 19° 43' 02.64" NLONGITUDE: 155° 55' 22.88" WSITE INFORMATION:COORDINATES:HUE HUE ST. TMK (3)7-3-048:004KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740ADDRESS:DESIGN LOADING:COUNTY:HAWAII COUNTY, HAWAII40'-0"0' - 40'-0" 5/16" 30 3/4" 43"151413161718123456789101112NORTHSOUTHWEST73.5 Lightning Rod 2"x10'69.5250 SQ FT x Ka (Ka=1.0)59125 SQ FT x Ka (Ka=1.0).306"/FT..306"/FT.MONOPOLE DESIGN CRITERIA:RISK CATEGORY IIEXPOSURE CATEGORY CTOPOGRAPHIC CATEGORY 1174 MPH WIND & NO ICE (3-SEC GUST)60 MPH WIND & NO ICE (SERVICE) DESIGN PER TIA-222-HSEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY ESITE CLASS CSEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA:Ss= 2.31S1= 1.023T = 12L(12) 1 5/8" (INSIDE POLE)(12) 1 5/8" (INSIDE POLE)40'-0"4'-0"8'-0"4'-9"SLIP JOINT73'-6"MINIMUM 4'-3"DESIGN 4'-9"MAXIMUM 5'-3"38'-3"VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221EXPIRES: 4-30-202412/02/2022THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY SUPERVISION.CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECTWILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATIONWHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. Ehresmann EngineeringDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:ENG APPR.MFG APPR.Q.C.NAMETITLE:DWG. NO.SITE:JOB#SHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONDATEREV012345674400 West 31st StreetYankton, SD 57078605-665-7532605-665-9780DRAWING CREATEDRev. 011285073'-6"" MONOPOLE MAP TYPEFOUNDATION DESIGN112850E02E02824947 - KALOKOMAUKA, HITER11-14-22151413161718123456789101112NORTHSOUTHWEST EASTMATERIAL LISTGRADE60B 1216C105QTY30ITEMA 60DESCRIPTION#4 BARS1 3/4"Ø X 6'-0"#8 BARS6'-0"D 72 60#9 BARS21'-6"E 72 6021'-6"(36) EACH WAY-TOP#9 BARS(36) EACH WAY-BOTTOM5'-3"19"HOOK1. LATERAL REINFORCEMENT, CONSISTING OF TWO (2) HORIZONTAL TIESSHALL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5" OF TOP OF CONCRETE PER ACI 318.THE ENDS OF ALL CIRCULAR TIES SHALL TERMINATE WITH STANDARDHOOKS THAT ENGAGE A LONGITUDINAL COLUMN BAR.2. FOUNDATION DESIGN BASED ON SOILS REPORT BY TEP, INC. DATEDOCTOBER 6TH, 2022, PROJECT NO. 134255.717941. CONTRACTOR TOREVIEW SOILS REPORT FOR POSSIBLE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS BYGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.3. MINIMUM COMPACTED UNIT WEIGHT OF ALL BACKFILL TO BE 100 PCF.4. 40.77 CUBIC YARDS CONCRETE REQUIRED THIS FOUNDATION.5. MONOPOLE BASE REACTIONS; MOMENT = 2,347 FT-KIPS SHEAR = 40 KIPS AXIAL = 21 KIPS6'-0"4" HOOKS8 3/8" LAP(STAGGERED)TOP VIEWELEVATION VIEWTHE CONTRACTOR.* SUPPLIED BY EE, ALL OTHER MATERIAL TO BE SUPPLIED BY*ED7'-9"7'-9"Ø6'-6"22'-0"8'-0"Ø6'-0"8'-0"22'-0"(16x) 1 3/4"Ø ANCHOR BOLTSON A Ø50" BOLT CIRCLE.USE TEMPLATE FURNISHEDWITH MONOPOLE TO CORRECTLYPLACE ANCHOR BOLTS AS SHOWN.SEE DWG #112850E03 FOR PROPERANCHOR BOLT & TEMPLATE ASSEMBLY7 5/16" C.T.C.EDADOUBLE TIESCTHE CLEAR DISTANCE FROM THETOP OF CONCRETE TO THE BOTTOMLEVELING NUT IS NOT TO EXCEED 1.0TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ANCHOR BOLT6" ABOVE GRADE1'-0" PROJECTED LENGTH6'-0"2'-0"3'-6" B(SEE NOTE #1)(6" SPACING C.T.C.)CEMENT: TYPE I/II PORTLAND CEMENT28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH = 4500 PSIMAXIMUM WATER/CEMENT RATIO = 0.45SLUMP = 4"-6"ENTRAINED AIR CONTENT = 5%-7%CONCRETE MIX REQUIREMENTS:6'-6"VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221EXPIRES: 4-30-202412/02/2022THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY SUPERVISION.CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECTWILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATIONWHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221 EXPIRES: 4-30-2024 12/02/2022 THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION WHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. Ehresmann EngineeringDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:ENG APPR.MFG APPR.Q.C.NAMETITLE:DWG. NO.SITE:JOB#SHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONDATEREV012345674400 West 31st StreetYankton, SD 57078605-665-7532605-665-9780DRAWING CREATEDRev. 3112850STD TOWER & TOWERFOUNDATION NOTES112850N01HN01H824947 - KALOKOMAUKA, HIEJH03-13-17U-BOLT/STEP-BOLT GR. 10/16/19TUBE BRACING NOTE 10/29/19COMPANY NAME 6/27/22Anchor Rod Tightening:Prior to placing anchor rods in the concrete, it is recommended that an anchor rod rotationcapacity test be run with at least one anchor rod. This test may be run in a Skidmore-Wilhelmdevice or in a mockup of the base plate using a small piece of plate with one hole of equivalentgrade, thickness, and finish. The test consists of steps 2 through 12 as outlined below andadapted as necessary for the mock set-up. It is recommended that the nut be rotated at least tothe required rotation as given in step 12. After the test, the nuts should be removed and allthreads (rod and nut) inspected for damage. Once the anchor rod is removed from the test plate,the nuts shall again be turned onto the rod well past the location of the leveling nut and backedoff by one worker using an ordinary wrench with no cheater bar. The threads are considereddamaged if more than minimal effort is required to turn the nut. Please note that nuts should beturned onto ALL anchor rods and backed of with minimal effort as outlined above to verifythreads of ALL anchor rods and nuts prior to placement in concrete.Recommended Steps for Anchor Rod Tightening:1. Verify proper position of anchor rods.2. Verify that all nuts can be turned onto the rods well past the elevation of the bottom of theleveling nut and backed off by one worker using an ordinary wrench without a cheater bar.3. If threads of anchor rods were lubricated more than 24 hours before placing the leveling nut orhave been wet since they were lubricated, the exposed threads of the anchor rodsshould be relubricated (Beeswax and toilet-ring wax have been shown to provide goodlubrication).4. Place leveling nuts on anchor rods and level.5. Place leveling nut washers.6. Set pole or tower legs.7. Plumb pole or legs and/or level base plates.8. Place top nut washers.9. Threads and bearing surfaces of the top nuts should be lubricated, placed and tightened tothe snug-tight condition in a star pattern.10. Tighten leveling nuts to the snug-tight condition in a star pattern.11. Mark the reference position of the top nut in the snug-tight condition with a suitable markingon one flat with a corresponding reference mark on the base plate at each bolt.12. Top nuts shall be rotated, with the leveling nut secured, an additional 1/3 turn for anchor rods1.5 in. or less in diameter and an additional 1/6 turn for anchor rod diameters greater than 1.5"per TIA-222-H section 4.9.9.13. Locking nuts are to be installed over all top nuts when tightening is completed.GENERAL:Ehresmann Engineering (EE) designs and manufactures steel towers/poles and towercomponents to the most stringent industry standards, and uses the highest quality materials.However, certain hazards are inherent in tower work. For this reason, it is imperative thaterection of towers and installation of tower components be accomplished in a safe andworkmanlike manner, and only by experienced and professional contractors. Unless thecustomer specifies otherwise in writing, or unless otherwise noted in our design documentsor on our installation drawings, design of and/or fabrication of items by EhresmannEngineering shall meet the conditions outlined in these notes.1. All tower designs and/or work shall be in accordance with TIA-222-H, “Structural Standardfor Antenna Supporting Structures, Antennas and Small Wind Turbine Support Structures”or as otherwise specified in writing by the customer.2. Purchasers shall verify the installation is in conformance with all local, state, and federalrequirements. This also includes requirements for obstruction marking and lighting.3. If towers, tower components, mounts, foundations or modification materials are notinstalled in accordance with Ehresmann Engineering installation drawings andspecifications, then all designs are considered invalid, and EE disclaims any responsibilityfor said design and/or certification.4. The purchaser shall be responsible to inspect condition of underground anchors prior towork on towers, and to furnish any and all soils reports, where required.5. All items must be inventoried at the time of delivery to the job site/storage facility. Anyshortages reported after this delivery will be the responsibility of the Contractor/Owner.6. Any problems that occur with scheduling, transportation, delivery, foundation installation,erection or any items furnished by EE must be reported immediately to allow EE time to takecorrective measures. EE will make every effort to repair/replace necessary items in anexpedited manner and/or will pursue corrective measures in the most economical waypossible at our discretion. However, under no circumstances will EE pay for or beresponsible for any down time or expenses incurred due to down time.7. EE will make every effort to deliver materials at the requested time. However, we cannotand will not be responsible for delays caused by breakdowns, weather and/or other factorsout of our control once the materials have left our facility. We strongly suggest that cranes,tower crews, etc... not be scheduled until delivery is verified to be on time. EE will not beresponsible for any costs incurred due to these possible delays.8. Any and all permits, licenses, or payment of taxes required for construction are the soleresponsibility of the purchaser.9. Manufacturer Assistance: Contractors / Erectors may contact Ehresmann Engineering at(605) 665-7532 for questions on design, materials, or installation regarding items furnishedby Ehresmann Engineering.10. Ehresmann Engineering is available, upon request, to supervise installation and/orcompletion of modifications, or to provide on-site inspection after project completion.11. Although rare, excessive deflection can occasionally occur in canister poles andconcealment/shrouded structures at low wind speeds. Since the phenomenon is influencedby many factors and variables, it is generally unpredictable. Therefore, it is the tower/poleowner's responsibility to periodically observe the structure for excessive deflection and anyresulting damage or affects on the structure or its connections. In the event of excessivedeflection or movement of the structure, Ehresmann Engineering is to be notifiedimmediately. Modifications to the structure may be required at the owner's expense.**Please also reference site specific design documents and drawings for additional notes.Structural Steel & Hardware:1. All fabricated steel shall have a minimum yield strength of 36 ksi. Use of higherstrength steel for some members/items will be noted in design documents ordrawings as applicable.2. All fabricated steel shall be hot dip galvanized per ASTM A123.3. All structural fasteners shall be ASTM F3125 Gr. A325 unless specifiedotherwise.4. U-Bolts to be ASTM A36, A572 Gr. 50, or A193 Gr. B7 depending on size andapplication. Reference site specific drawings for additional details.5. Step Bolts to be ASTM A4496. All hardware shall be hot dip galvanized per ASTM A153 or ASTM F2329.7. Welded connections shall conform to the latest revision of the American WeldingSociety, A.W.S. D1.1.8. All structural components shall be verified for proper assembly by the field crewprior to installation.Concrete & Foundation Installation:1. All rebar shall have 3" minimum cover, unless specified otherwise, and shall conform toASTM A615. Rebar grade to be as specified on site drawings.2. Tie and secure all rebar and anchor bolts/shafts before placing concrete.3. Hook length as specified for vertical bars is from back side of bend. Minimum straight lengthof hook after bend shall be 12x bar diameter.4. Bending of rebar to be in accordance with ACI-318 latest edition.5. Sides of excavation may need to be braced or sloped back as required for stability and inaccordance with all applicable safety regulations.6. Base of excavation shall be clean and free of all debris.7. All excavation, backfill and soil compaction to be completed in accordance with GeotechnicalEngineer's recommendations. However, compacted density of all backfill must meet minimumunit weight as specified on site drawings.8. Attention shall be given to final site drainage and compaction of the fill placed around thefoundation to minimize surface water infiltration around the foundation.9. Concrete strength and mix values to be listed on site specific foundation drawings. Alternatevalues may be acceptable and could be dependent on placement methods. However, use ofalternate values must be approved by EOR prior to installation. EE will not be responsible forany delays due to request for approval of alternate values. It is the Contractor's responsibility toallow adequate time for approval.10. Use of water reducers may be required for some placement methods to achieve necessaryslump and/or flow without exceeding maximum water/cement ratios. It is Contractor'sresponsibility to utilize proper mix to ensure proper placement of concrete for the method ofplacement chosen.11. Exposed edges of all foundations to be chamfered 1" x 45°.12. Use steel top and bottom anchor bolt templates provided by EE for proper anchor boltspacing and placement.13. All concrete work shall be in accordance with ACI 318 (Latest Edition). ACI specificationsfor "Cold Weather" or "Hot Weather" concreting shall be followed as applicable.Erection / Installation:When installing items provided by Ehresmann Engineering, the contractor (person performingthe erection or modification) shall comply with the following:1. All structural work shall be performed in relatively calmweather, with wind velocities notexceeding 15 MPH at any height of the tower. Additionally it is recommended that work becompleted in accordance with ANSI/TIA-322 and ANSI/ASSE A10.48. 2. All structural workshall be performed by a competent and reputable contractor with experience in similar towerwork.3. Our drawings indicate the major operations to be performed, but do not show every fieldcondition that may be encountered. Prior to beginning work, the contractor should survey thejob thoroughly to eliminate future field problems.4. It is the contractor’s sole responsibility to determine the erection procedure and sequenceto insure the stability and safety of the tower and adequacy of temporary or incompleteconnections during construction.5. All nuts for bearing type connections shall be tightened to a "snug tight" condition asdefined by AISC. All nuts for direct tension/fully pre-tensioned or slip critical connections(except anchor rod nuts) shall be tightened per the ‘turn-of-the-nut’ method in accordancewith AISC.6. It shall be the contractor's responsibility to ensure that all practices and procedures usedduring assembly, installation and erection work required on the tower or foundations do notendanger the safety of any personnel nor the structural integrity of the tower.7. The contractor shall use only safe and workmanlikeprocedures when modifying a tower.8. The contractor shall not correct any errors in manufacturing or design without specialpermission and written instructions from Ehresmann Engineering. This means straightening,relocation or reaming of bolt holes, drifting or any other application of force to make themembers fit. (This restriction does not apply to diagonal members designed for initial tensionor specific ‘draw’.) The contractor shall immediately notify Ehresmann Engineering throughthe appropriate channels to effect correction.9. The contractor shall immediately notify Ehresmann Engineering of any material which isdamaged during erection or installation. The contractor shall not correct or substitute anymember damaged during installation without written consent and instructions fromEhresmann Engineering.10. The contractor shall refrain from exerting excessive forces on the tower or on modificationmaterial during installation. Tower member design does not include stresses due to erectionsince erection equipment and conditions areunknown. Our design assumes that the services of competent and qualified personnel will beutilized to develop proper procedures and rigging plans. Our design also assumes thatcompetent and qualified personnel will be hired to perform the work.11. All field-punched holes shall be touched up with coldgalvanizing. Under no circumstances shall the torching ofholes be allowed.12. All factory installed bracing placed within monopole tube sections is to remain in placeuntil erection is complete. Do not remove bracing without prior consultation with EE.VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221EXPIRES: 4-30-202412/02/2022THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY SUPERVISION.CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECTWILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATIONWHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221 EXPIRES: 4-30-2024 12/02/2022 THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION WHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. 23 EXHIBIT D FAA NOTICE CRITERIA DETERMINATION 24 EXHIBIT E ANTENNA STRUCTURE REGISTRATION 25 EXHIBIT F T-MOBILE COVERAGE MAPS Existing Coverage – Zoomed Out 26 EXHIBIT F T-MOBILE COVERAGE MAPS Proposed Coverage – Zoomed Out 27 EXHIBIT F T-MOBILE COVERAGE MAPS Existing Coverage – Zoomed In 28 EXHIBIT F T-MOBILE COVERAGE MAPS Proposed Coverage – Zoomed In 29 EXHIBIT G HAWAII COUNTY LAND USE MAP 30 EXHIBIT H HAWAII COUNTY SMA MAP 31 EXHIBIT I ACCESS TO FACILITY 32 EXHIBIT J HISTORIC DISTRICT MAP 33 EXHIBIT K POLICE AND FIRE STATION MAPS Nearest Police Station – 12.5 miles Nearest Fire Station – 12.9 miles 34 EXHIBIT L NORTH KONA NATURAL BEAUTY SITES 35 EXHIBIT M STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REPORT [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] Section 106 Report May 30, 2024 Kaloko Mauka BU 824947 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona, Hawaii County, Hawaii 96740 Trileaf # 735423 Prepared By: Trileaf Corporation 2121 West Chandler Blvd., Suite 108 Prepared For: Crown Castle 2000 Corporate Dr. Canonsburg, PA 15317 Chandler, AZ 85224 1 12/16/19 CROWN CASTLE USA FCC / NEPA ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE CHECKLIST Section 106 Only To Be Used for Substantial Increases, Rooftops, Twilight Towers Amanda Wrona YES NO 1. Will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, objects or other cultural resources listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places? 2. Will the facility affect Indian religious sites? A COPY OF A COMPLETED CROWN CASTLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION FCC ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SURVEY DOCUMENTING THE PROCESS USED IN ARRIVING AT THE ABOVE ANSWERS MUST BE ATTACHED TO THIS FORM. IF ALL OF THE QUESTIONS ABOVE WERE ANSWERED “NO”, NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED FOR FCC ENVIRONMENTAL PURPOSES. Amanda Wrona May 30, 2024 Name Date Trileaf Corporation Company Name Site Name: Kaloko Mauka Contact Person: BU/SCU#: 824947 Contact Number: X X 480-850-0575 2 12/16/19 Crown Castle USA FCC Environmental Compliance Survey Site Name: Kaloko Mauka Location: 73-4310 Huehue Street, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii County, Hawaii 96740 Business Unit Number: 824947 This Survey will identify whether a proposed facility will require the preparation and filing of an FCC Environmental Assessment. In completing the survey, the consultant may analyze accurate, up-to-date information obtained from a commercial service in conjunction with consultation with the appropriate agencies and sources listed below. Unless otherwise specified, the consultant is not required to consult each of the listed agencies. A site inspection must be performed in all cases. This Survey supports the completion of the FCC/NEPA Environmental Compliance Checklist and shall be attached as an addendum to the Checklist. Answer “yes/no” questions only after completing the enumerated steps. Yes No 1.Based upon consultation with the State Historic Preservation Office(“SHPO”) in accordance with the Programmatic Agreement, and taking intoconsideration the views of interested persons, will the facility affect districts,sites, buildings, structures or objects significant in American history,architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that are listed, or eligible forlisting, in the National Register of Historic Places? If the SHPO issues a “no effect” or “no adverse effect” letter, this question can be answered “no.” If the SHPO issues an “adverse effect” finding, thisquestion must be answered “yes.” To answer this question, follow the steps listed in Exhibit A (attached). Provide copies of all correspondence from all parties contacted. Supporting Information: A search of the National Historic Landmarks (NHL), National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), and State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) files was conducted by Matthew Clark, Principal Investigator contracted by Trileaf through ASM Affiliates, to identify any cultural resources within the area of direct effects and within a 0.50-mile radius for visual effects. It was determined that there were no historic properties identified within the Area of Potential Effects (APE) for direct effects or visual effects. Additionally, the identification process did not locate archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs. Documentation of these reviews was submitted to the SHPO via Form 621 on March 27, 2024. The SHPO concurred that the proposed undertaking has no historic properties affected in a response letter dated May 17, 2024. A copy of the SHPO concurrence letter, Form 621, and associated documents are located in Appendix E. X 3 12/16/19 On February 5, 2024, Mr. Alex Roy with the County of Hawaii Planning Department and the Historic Hawaii Foundation were notified of the proposed project and invited to comment on the proposed project’s potential effect on Historic Properties as well as indicate whether they are interested in consulting further on the proposed project. Additionally, a legal notice regarding the proposed telecommunications tower construction was posted in the West Hawaii Today on February 21, 2024. No comments from the local government, historical society, or legal notice have been received by Trileaf. Copies of the correspondence and legal notice are located in Appendix E. 2. Based upon consultation with the Tribal Historical Preservation Officer (“THPO”) or other official representatives of federally recognized tribes, will the proposed construction affect places or properties of significance to such tribes, including Indian religious sites? 2 (a) If the proposed facility is NOT located on tribal land or an Indian reservation: Determine whether any federally recognized Indian tribe or Native Hawaiian Organization (NHO) with ancestral ties to the immediate area of the proposed project wishes to participate in the Section 106 consultation process for the proposed project. A. Enter information about the proposed construction into the FCC’s Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) in order to contact the appropriate Tribes and attach FCC Form 620 or Form 621 (unless such forms are not required for SHPO review). If not SHPO review ids required, provide the following information to the tribes: contact information for the applicant, a map of the proposed location of the facility, coordinates of the proposed facility, a description of the facility to be constructed including all proposed elements (such as, for example, access roads), and a description of the proposed site, including both aerial and site photographs. B. After 30 days have passed, notify the FCC of the tribal non- responsiveness. C. The FCC will initiate contact with the Tribe within 5 business days. If the subject Tribe does not respond within 15 calendar days of the date of FCC’s communication, no further due diligence is required for that particular Tribe. D. This section number 6 may be answered “no” only after each subject Tribe either, (i) concurs with Crown Castle’s proposed project, or (ii) all of the above steps are completed. 2 (b) If the proposed facility IS located on tribal land or reservation: Begin consultation with the THPO or tribal representative through the TCNS process. However, please note that the NPA does not apply on tribal land and therefore, the timeframes for tribal review do not apply. Please consult Corporate Regulatory with any questions. Provide copies of all correspondence from all parties contacted. X 4 12/16/19 Supporting Information: On January 29, 2024 Trileaf submitted the Tower Construction Notification (TCNS) to the FCC who initiated contact with the tribes on February 2, 2024. As of May 9, 2024, all tribes have confirmed clearance either directly or by default via the FCC referral process. Trileaf determined that the subject Property is not located on or near a Native American Religious or Sacred Site. However, if archaeological remains or resources are unearthed during construction activities, Trileaf recommends that the client stop construction and notify our office immediately. Tribal consultation documentation and associated correspondence is located in Appendix F. ______________________ May 30, 2024 Signature Date Project Scientist Title Trileaf Corporation Company Appendix A Site Plans IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.4T-1REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/11/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022REV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION405/11/2023ASDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONASPROJECT DESCRIPTIONLOCATION MAPNO SCALESITE INFORMATIONCARRIER/APPLICANT:HAWAIIAN ELECTRIC808-329-3584ELECTRIC PROVIDER:HAWAIIAN TELCOM808-643-7788TELCO PROVIDER:GROUND ELEVATION:19.71737052-155.92304680UFACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FORHUMAN HABITATIONOCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:A.D.A. COMPLIANCE:MAP/PARCEL #:COUNTY OF HAWAIIJURISDICTION:730480030000KALOKO MAUKAHAWAIIAREA OF CONSTRUCTION:EXISTINGNAD83A-20APROPERTY OWNER:CROWN CASTLE2000 CORPORATE DRIVECANONSBURG, PA 15317TOWER OWNER:IIBTYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:4957.35 FT73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740JONES,VANNOY M TR73-4310 HUEHUE STKAILUA KONA, HI 96740 8695CROWN CASTLE USA INC.SITE NAME:LAT/LONG TYPE:LONGITUDE:LATITUDE:CURRENT ZONING:COUNTY:SITE ADDRESS:PROJECT TEAMA&E FIRM:CROWN CASTLEUSA INC. DISTRICTCONTACTS:150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 96734THE PURPOSE OF THIS PROJECT IS TO ENHANCE BROADBANDCONNECTIVITY AND CAPACITY TO THE EXISTING ELIGIBLE WIRELESSFACILITY.TOWER SCOPE OF WORK:·REMOVE (4) ANTENNAS·REMOVE (2) TMAs·REMOVE (8) COAX CABLES (7/8")·INSTALL (4) ANTENNAS·INSTALL (4) RRHs·INSTALL (2) HYBRID CABLES (1-5/8")·INSTALL MOUNT MODIFICATIONS PER MOUNT ANALYSIS -CONDITIONAL PASSING REPORT ISSUED BY TRYLON DATED 02/07/2023GROUND SCOPE OF WORK:·REMOVE (1) WOOD POLE·REMOVE (1) BBU CABINET·REMOVE (2) RRUS11 B2 RRUs·REMOVE (2) RADIO 4449 B71+B85·REMOVE (2) TRIPLEXERS·INSTALL (1) 6160 SITE SUPPORT CABINET·INSTALL (1) B160 BATTERY CABINET·INSTALL (1) AAV CABINET·INSTALL (1) NEW STEEL MONOPOLE (BY EHRESMANN ENGINEERING)NOTE:PRIOR TO ACCESSING/ENTERING THE SITE YOU MUST CONTACT THECROWN NOC AT (800) 788-7011 & CROWN CONSTRUCTION MANAGER.T-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:T-MOBILE SITE NAME:SITE TYPE:TOWER HEIGHT:T-MOBILE PROJECT NAME:BUSINESS UNIT #:SITE ADDRESS:COUNTY:JURISDICTION:HI04193BKALOKO MAUKAMONOPOLE73'-6"ANCHOR/DRIP824947HAWAIICOUNTY OF HAWAII73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740SHEET #DRAWING INDEXSHEET DESCRIPTIONTITLE SHEETT-1OVERALL SITE PLANA-1EXISTING SITE PLANTOWER ELEVATIONSGENERAL NOTESGN-1ALL DRAWINGS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE FORMATTED FORFULL SIZE. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS ANDEXISTING DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITEAND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER INWRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDINGWITH THE WORK OR BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME.ANTENNA PLANSPLUMBING DIAGRAMZONING INFO730480030000FRONT = 30'-0"SIDE = 20'-0"REAR = 30'-0"TMK:YARD SETBACKS:A-20AZONING DISTRICT:45'-0"HEIGHT LIMITZONE XFLOOD ZONEA-2A-3A-5A-8A-4E-1E-3ANTENNA GROUNDING DIAGRAMGROUNDING DETAILSZONE 4SEISMIC ZONE:SEE REFERENCE DOCUMENTSTOWER WINDLOAD:CALL HAWAII ONE CALL(800) 423-7287CALL 3 WORKING DAYSBEFORE YOU DIG!APPLICABLE CODES/REFERENCEDOCUMENTSALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED AND MATERIALS INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BYTHE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BECONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES:CODE TYPECODEBUILDING2018 IBC W/ AMENDMENTSELECTRICAL2017 NEC W/ AMENDMENTSENERGY2018 IECC W/ AMENDMENTSFIRE PROTECTION2006 NFPA-1TOWER DESIGN:SEAL DATE:EHRESMANN ENGINEERING12/02/2022REFERENCE DOCUMENTS:MOUNT ANALYSIS:DATED:TRYLON02/07/2023RFDS REVISION:DATED:902/22/2023ORDER ID:REVISION:5783900T-MOBILE3375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 96819ERIC SCHATZ - MARKET MANAGER(808) 723-0005ERIC.SCHATZ@CROWNCASTLE.COMTROY BANTOLINA - CONSTRUCTION MANAGER(808) 479-4097TROY.BANTOLINA@CROWNCASTLE.COMOLEG GAPONOV - A&E SPECIALIST(206) 336-7416OLEG.GAPONOV@CROWNCASTLE.COMENGINEERED TOWER SOLUTIONS, PLLC3227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615CROWNAESERVICES@ETS-PLLC.COMEQUIPMENT DETAILSA-6FINAL SITE PLANEQUIPMENT DETAILSA-7E-2PANEL SCHEDULE AND ELECTRICALCONNECTION DIAGRAMADRIAN CATALAN - REAL ESTATE SPECIALIST(808) 358-5556ADRIAN.CATALAN@CROWNCASTLE.COME-4SITE ELECTRICAL PLANE-5SITE GROUNDING PLANKANOE EISELIN - PROJECT MANAGER(808) 277-4178KANOE.EISELIN@CROWNCASTLE.COM73'-6" MONOPOLEE01ATTACHED TOWER DESIGN DRAWINGS (BY EHRESMANNENGINEERING)73'-6" MONOPOLE MAP TYPE FOUNDATIONDESIGNE0273'-6" MONOPOLE PIER TYPE FOUNDATIONDESIGNE02ASTD TOWER & TOWER FOUNDATION NOTESN01H73'-6" MONOPOLE SPECIAL INSPECTIONSTATEMENTS1STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS:SEAL DATE:CROWN CASTLE02/27/2023 IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3GN-1REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONIT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3GN-1REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-1REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-2REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.4A-3REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/11/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022REV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION405/11/2023ASDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONAS IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.4A-4REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/11/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022REV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION405/11/2023ASDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONAS IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.4A-5REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/11/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022REV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION405/11/2023ASDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONAS IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-6REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-7REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION IT IS A VIOLATION OF LAW FOR ANY PERSON,UNLESS THEY ARE ACTING UNDER THE DIRECTIONOF A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER,TO ALTER THIS DOCUMENT.3A-8REVISION:SHEET NUMBER:ISSUED FOR:DRWNREVDESCRIPTIONDES./QADATET-MOBILE SITE NUMBER:HI04193BBU #: 824947KALOKO MAUKA73-4310 HUEHUE STREETKAILUA-KONA, HI 96740PROJECT NAME:ANCHOR/DRIPTMK: 730480030000REPLACEMENT 73'-6"MONOPOLE150 HAMAKUA DRIVE, #703KAILUA, HI 967343375 KOAPAKA STREET, G300HONOLULU, HI 968193227 WELLINGTON COURTRALEIGH, NC 27615001/28/2022ASBSCONSTRUCTIONTHIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDERMY SUPERVISION AND CONSTRUCTION OF THISPROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION05/08/2023SIGNATURELICENSE EXPIRATION DATESEAL DATE04/30/2024112/21/2022ASREV. CONSTRUCTION202/21/2023DFDGREV. CONSTRUCTIONBS305/08/2023CPDGREV. CONSTRUCTION Ehresmann EngineeringDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:ENG APPR.MFG APPR.Q.C.NAMETITLE:DWG. NO.SITE:JOB#SHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONDATEREV012345674400 West 31st StreetYankton, SD 57078605-665-7532605-665-9780DRAWING CREATEDRev. 011285073'-6" MONOPOLE112850E01E01824947 - KALOKOMAUKA, HITER11-14-22MAXIMUM BASE MOMENT & FORCESMOMENT(FT-KIPS) (KIPS)SHEAR(KIPS)AXIALPOLE DATA2347 40 21POLE_________KSI 18 SIDED65 ELEV. TOP DIA.BASE DIA.TAPER(16x) 1 3/4"Ø F1554 GRADE 105 KSI57"Ø, 1 3/4" THICK, ROUNDASTM A572 50 KSIBASE PLATE DATA:TEMPLATE O.D. = Ø55" A36ANCHOR BOLT DATA:X 6'-0" LG ON A 50"Ø BOLT CIRCLEFEEDLINESELEV. ITEM(16x) 3/8" THICK X 12" TALL GUSSETSASTM A572 65 KSI38-3" 21" 32 3/4"35'-3"- 73'-6" 1/4"NOTES:1. ORIENT V-NOTCH ON TOP OF TEMPLATE AND REFERENCETAB ON BASE PLATE @ 0°.2. STAMP "EE 112850" ON TOP OF BASE PLATE (NEAR NORTHTAB) WITH 1/2” STEEL STAMPS.LATITUDE: 19° 43' 02.64" NLONGITUDE: 155° 55' 22.88" WSITE INFORMATION:COORDINATES:HUE HUE ST. TMK (3)7-3-048:004KAILUA-KONA, HI 96740ADDRESS:DESIGN LOADING:COUNTY:HAWAII COUNTY, HAWAII40'-0"0' - 40'-0" 5/16" 30 3/4" 43"151413161718123456789101112NORTHSOUTHWEST73.5 Lightning Rod 2"x10'69.5250 SQ FT x Ka (Ka=1.0)59125 SQ FT x Ka (Ka=1.0).306"/FT..306"/FT.MONOPOLE DESIGN CRITERIA:RISK CATEGORY IIEXPOSURE CATEGORY CTOPOGRAPHIC CATEGORY 1174 MPH WIND & NO ICE (3-SEC GUST)60 MPH WIND & NO ICE (SERVICE) DESIGN PER TIA-222-HSEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY ESITE CLASS CSEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIA:Ss= 2.31S1= 1.023T = 12L(12) 1 5/8" (INSIDE POLE)(12) 1 5/8" (INSIDE POLE)40'-0"4'-0"8'-0"4'-9"SLIP JOINT73'-6"MINIMUM 4'-3"DESIGN 4'-9"MAXIMUM 5'-3"38'-3"VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221EXPIRES: 4-30-202412/02/2022THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY SUPERVISION.CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECTWILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATIONWHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. Ehresmann EngineeringDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:ENG APPR.MFG APPR.Q.C.NAMETITLE:DWG. NO.SITE:JOB#SHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONDATEREV012345674400 West 31st StreetYankton, SD 57078605-665-7532605-665-9780DRAWING CREATEDRev. 011285073'-6"" MONOPOLE MAP TYPEFOUNDATION DESIGN112850E02E02824947 - KALOKOMAUKA, HITER11-14-22151413161718123456789101112NORTHSOUTHWEST EASTMATERIAL LISTGRADE60B 1216C105QTY30ITEMA 60DESCRIPTION#4 BARS1 3/4"Ø X 6'-0"#8 BARS6'-0"D 72 60#9 BARS21'-6"E 72 6021'-6"(36) EACH WAY-TOP#9 BARS(36) EACH WAY-BOTTOM5'-3"19"HOOK1. LATERAL REINFORCEMENT, CONSISTING OF TWO (2) HORIZONTAL TIESSHALL BE DISTRIBUTED WITHIN 5" OF TOP OF CONCRETE PER ACI 318.THE ENDS OF ALL CIRCULAR TIES SHALL TERMINATE WITH STANDARDHOOKS THAT ENGAGE A LONGITUDINAL COLUMN BAR.2. FOUNDATION DESIGN BASED ON SOILS REPORT BY TEP, INC. DATEDOCTOBER 6TH, 2022, PROJECT NO. 134255.717941. CONTRACTOR TOREVIEW SOILS REPORT FOR POSSIBLE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS BYGEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.3. MINIMUM COMPACTED UNIT WEIGHT OF ALL BACKFILL TO BE 100 PCF.4. 40.77 CUBIC YARDS CONCRETE REQUIRED THIS FOUNDATION.5. MONOPOLE BASE REACTIONS; MOMENT = 2,347 FT-KIPS SHEAR = 40 KIPS AXIAL = 21 KIPS6'-0"4" HOOKS8 3/8" LAP(STAGGERED)TOP VIEWELEVATION VIEWTHE CONTRACTOR.* SUPPLIED BY EE, ALL OTHER MATERIAL TO BE SUPPLIED BY*ED7'-9"7'-9"Ø6'-6"22'-0"8'-0"Ø6'-0"8'-0"22'-0"(16x) 1 3/4"Ø ANCHOR BOLTSON A Ø50" BOLT CIRCLE.USE TEMPLATE FURNISHEDWITH MONOPOLE TO CORRECTLYPLACE ANCHOR BOLTS AS SHOWN.SEE DWG #112850E03 FOR PROPERANCHOR BOLT & TEMPLATE ASSEMBLY7 5/16" C.T.C.EDADOUBLE TIESCTHE CLEAR DISTANCE FROM THETOP OF CONCRETE TO THE BOTTOMLEVELING NUT IS NOT TO EXCEED 1.0TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE ANCHOR BOLT6" ABOVE GRADE1'-0" PROJECTED LENGTH6'-0"2'-0"3'-6" B(SEE NOTE #1)(6" SPACING C.T.C.)CEMENT: TYPE I/II PORTLAND CEMENT28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH = 4500 PSIMAXIMUM WATER/CEMENT RATIO = 0.45SLUMP = 4"-6"ENTRAINED AIR CONTENT = 5%-7%CONCRETE MIX REQUIREMENTS:6'-6"VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221EXPIRES: 4-30-202412/02/2022THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY SUPERVISION.CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECTWILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATIONWHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221 EXPIRES: 4-30-2024 12/02/2022 THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION WHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. Ehresmann EngineeringDRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:ENG APPR.MFG APPR.Q.C.NAMETITLE:DWG. NO.SITE:JOB#SHEET NO.DESCRIPTIONDATEREV012345674400 West 31st StreetYankton, SD 57078605-665-7532605-665-9780DRAWING CREATEDRev. 3112850STD TOWER & TOWERFOUNDATION NOTES112850N01HN01H824947 - KALOKOMAUKA, HIEJH03-13-17U-BOLT/STEP-BOLT GR. 10/16/19TUBE BRACING NOTE 10/29/19COMPANY NAME 6/27/22Anchor Rod Tightening:Prior to placing anchor rods in the concrete, it is recommended that an anchor rod rotationcapacity test be run with at least one anchor rod. This test may be run in a Skidmore-Wilhelmdevice or in a mockup of the base plate using a small piece of plate with one hole of equivalentgrade, thickness, and finish. The test consists of steps 2 through 12 as outlined below andadapted as necessary for the mock set-up. It is recommended that the nut be rotated at least tothe required rotation as given in step 12. After the test, the nuts should be removed and allthreads (rod and nut) inspected for damage. Once the anchor rod is removed from the test plate,the nuts shall again be turned onto the rod well past the location of the leveling nut and backedoff by one worker using an ordinary wrench with no cheater bar. The threads are considereddamaged if more than minimal effort is required to turn the nut. Please note that nuts should beturned onto ALL anchor rods and backed of with minimal effort as outlined above to verifythreads of ALL anchor rods and nuts prior to placement in concrete.Recommended Steps for Anchor Rod Tightening:1. Verify proper position of anchor rods.2. Verify that all nuts can be turned onto the rods well past the elevation of the bottom of theleveling nut and backed off by one worker using an ordinary wrench without a cheater bar.3. If threads of anchor rods were lubricated more than 24 hours before placing the leveling nut orhave been wet since they were lubricated, the exposed threads of the anchor rodsshould be relubricated (Beeswax and toilet-ring wax have been shown to provide goodlubrication).4. Place leveling nuts on anchor rods and level.5. Place leveling nut washers.6. Set pole or tower legs.7. Plumb pole or legs and/or level base plates.8. Place top nut washers.9. Threads and bearing surfaces of the top nuts should be lubricated, placed and tightened tothe snug-tight condition in a star pattern.10. Tighten leveling nuts to the snug-tight condition in a star pattern.11. Mark the reference position of the top nut in the snug-tight condition with a suitable markingon one flat with a corresponding reference mark on the base plate at each bolt.12. Top nuts shall be rotated, with the leveling nut secured, an additional 1/3 turn for anchor rods1.5 in. or less in diameter and an additional 1/6 turn for anchor rod diameters greater than 1.5"per TIA-222-H section 4.9.9.13. Locking nuts are to be installed over all top nuts when tightening is completed.GENERAL:Ehresmann Engineering (EE) designs and manufactures steel towers/poles and towercomponents to the most stringent industry standards, and uses the highest quality materials.However, certain hazards are inherent in tower work. For this reason, it is imperative thaterection of towers and installation of tower components be accomplished in a safe andworkmanlike manner, and only by experienced and professional contractors. Unless thecustomer specifies otherwise in writing, or unless otherwise noted in our design documentsor on our installation drawings, design of and/or fabrication of items by EhresmannEngineering shall meet the conditions outlined in these notes.1. All tower designs and/or work shall be in accordance with TIA-222-H, “Structural Standardfor Antenna Supporting Structures, Antennas and Small Wind Turbine Support Structures”or as otherwise specified in writing by the customer.2. Purchasers shall verify the installation is in conformance with all local, state, and federalrequirements. This also includes requirements for obstruction marking and lighting.3. If towers, tower components, mounts, foundations or modification materials are notinstalled in accordance with Ehresmann Engineering installation drawings andspecifications, then all designs are considered invalid, and EE disclaims any responsibilityfor said design and/or certification.4. The purchaser shall be responsible to inspect condition of underground anchors prior towork on towers, and to furnish any and all soils reports, where required.5. All items must be inventoried at the time of delivery to the job site/storage facility. Anyshortages reported after this delivery will be the responsibility of the Contractor/Owner.6. Any problems that occur with scheduling, transportation, delivery, foundation installation,erection or any items furnished by EE must be reported immediately to allow EE time to takecorrective measures. EE will make every effort to repair/replace necessary items in anexpedited manner and/or will pursue corrective measures in the most economical waypossible at our discretion. However, under no circumstances will EE pay for or beresponsible for any down time or expenses incurred due to down time.7. EE will make every effort to deliver materials at the requested time. However, we cannotand will not be responsible for delays caused by breakdowns, weather and/or other factorsout of our control once the materials have left our facility. We strongly suggest that cranes,tower crews, etc... not be scheduled until delivery is verified to be on time. EE will not beresponsible for any costs incurred due to these possible delays.8. Any and all permits, licenses, or payment of taxes required for construction are the soleresponsibility of the purchaser.9. Manufacturer Assistance: Contractors / Erectors may contact Ehresmann Engineering at(605) 665-7532 for questions on design, materials, or installation regarding items furnishedby Ehresmann Engineering.10. Ehresmann Engineering is available, upon request, to supervise installation and/orcompletion of modifications, or to provide on-site inspection after project completion.11. Although rare, excessive deflection can occasionally occur in canister poles andconcealment/shrouded structures at low wind speeds. Since the phenomenon is influencedby many factors and variables, it is generally unpredictable. Therefore, it is the tower/poleowner's responsibility to periodically observe the structure for excessive deflection and anyresulting damage or affects on the structure or its connections. In the event of excessivedeflection or movement of the structure, Ehresmann Engineering is to be notifiedimmediately. Modifications to the structure may be required at the owner's expense.**Please also reference site specific design documents and drawings for additional notes.Structural Steel & Hardware:1. All fabricated steel shall have a minimum yield strength of 36 ksi. Use of higherstrength steel for some members/items will be noted in design documents ordrawings as applicable.2. All fabricated steel shall be hot dip galvanized per ASTM A123.3. All structural fasteners shall be ASTM F3125 Gr. A325 unless specifiedotherwise.4. U-Bolts to be ASTM A36, A572 Gr. 50, or A193 Gr. B7 depending on size andapplication. Reference site specific drawings for additional details.5. Step Bolts to be ASTM A4496. All hardware shall be hot dip galvanized per ASTM A153 or ASTM F2329.7. Welded connections shall conform to the latest revision of the American WeldingSociety, A.W.S. D1.1.8. All structural components shall be verified for proper assembly by the field crewprior to installation.Concrete & Foundation Installation:1. All rebar shall have 3" minimum cover, unless specified otherwise, and shall conform toASTM A615. Rebar grade to be as specified on site drawings.2. Tie and secure all rebar and anchor bolts/shafts before placing concrete.3. Hook length as specified for vertical bars is from back side of bend. Minimum straight lengthof hook after bend shall be 12x bar diameter.4. Bending of rebar to be in accordance with ACI-318 latest edition.5. Sides of excavation may need to be braced or sloped back as required for stability and inaccordance with all applicable safety regulations.6. Base of excavation shall be clean and free of all debris.7. All excavation, backfill and soil compaction to be completed in accordance with GeotechnicalEngineer's recommendations. However, compacted density of all backfill must meet minimumunit weight as specified on site drawings.8. Attention shall be given to final site drainage and compaction of the fill placed around thefoundation to minimize surface water infiltration around the foundation.9. Concrete strength and mix values to be listed on site specific foundation drawings. Alternatevalues may be acceptable and could be dependent on placement methods. However, use ofalternate values must be approved by EOR prior to installation. EE will not be responsible forany delays due to request for approval of alternate values. It is the Contractor's responsibility toallow adequate time for approval.10. Use of water reducers may be required for some placement methods to achieve necessaryslump and/or flow without exceeding maximum water/cement ratios. It is Contractor'sresponsibility to utilize proper mix to ensure proper placement of concrete for the method ofplacement chosen.11. Exposed edges of all foundations to be chamfered 1" x 45°.12. Use steel top and bottom anchor bolt templates provided by EE for proper anchor boltspacing and placement.13. All concrete work shall be in accordance with ACI 318 (Latest Edition). ACI specificationsfor "Cold Weather" or "Hot Weather" concreting shall be followed as applicable.Erection / Installation:When installing items provided by Ehresmann Engineering, the contractor (person performingthe erection or modification) shall comply with the following:1. All structural work shall be performed in relatively calmweather, with wind velocities notexceeding 15 MPH at any height of the tower. Additionally it is recommended that work becompleted in accordance with ANSI/TIA-322 and ANSI/ASSE A10.48. 2. All structural workshall be performed by a competent and reputable contractor with experience in similar towerwork.3. Our drawings indicate the major operations to be performed, but do not show every fieldcondition that may be encountered. Prior to beginning work, the contractor should survey thejob thoroughly to eliminate future field problems.4. It is the contractor’s sole responsibility to determine the erection procedure and sequenceto insure the stability and safety of the tower and adequacy of temporary or incompleteconnections during construction.5. All nuts for bearing type connections shall be tightened to a "snug tight" condition asdefined by AISC. All nuts for direct tension/fully pre-tensioned or slip critical connections(except anchor rod nuts) shall be tightened per the ‘turn-of-the-nut’ method in accordancewith AISC.6. It shall be the contractor's responsibility to ensure that all practices and procedures usedduring assembly, installation and erection work required on the tower or foundations do notendanger the safety of any personnel nor the structural integrity of the tower.7. The contractor shall use only safe and workmanlikeprocedures when modifying a tower.8. The contractor shall not correct any errors in manufacturing or design without specialpermission and written instructions from Ehresmann Engineering. This means straightening,relocation or reaming of bolt holes, drifting or any other application of force to make themembers fit. (This restriction does not apply to diagonal members designed for initial tensionor specific ‘draw’.) The contractor shall immediately notify Ehresmann Engineering throughthe appropriate channels to effect correction.9. The contractor shall immediately notify Ehresmann Engineering of any material which isdamaged during erection or installation. The contractor shall not correct or substitute anymember damaged during installation without written consent and instructions fromEhresmann Engineering.10. The contractor shall refrain from exerting excessive forces on the tower or on modificationmaterial during installation. Tower member design does not include stresses due to erectionsince erection equipment and conditions areunknown. Our design assumes that the services of competent and qualified personnel will beutilized to develop proper procedures and rigging plans. Our design also assumes thatcompetent and qualified personnel will be hired to perform the work.11. All field-punched holes shall be touched up with coldgalvanizing. Under no circumstances shall the torching ofholes be allowed.12. All factory installed bracing placed within monopole tube sections is to remain in placeuntil erection is complete. Do not remove bracing without prior consultation with EE.VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221EXPIRES: 4-30-202412/02/2022THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY SUPERVISION.CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECTWILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATIONWHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. VSE Project Number: U1408-543-221 EXPIRES: 4-30-2024 12/02/2022 THIS WORK WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE UNDER MY OBSERVATION WHEN REQUIRED BY H.A.R. 16-115-9. Appendix B Site Maps Site Location & Surrounding Properties Site Location Aerial Photographs (2018) Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Site Location Kailua Quadrangle, Hawaii (2017) Contour Interval = 10 Feet Scale 1 Inch = ~2,000 Feet Latitude: 19° 43’ 2.535” N, Longitude: -155° 55’ 22.965” W  North Site Vicinity Map Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Site Location National Park Service National Historic Trails and Scenic Routes  North National Park Service – Trails and Routes Map Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Site Location National Park Service National Historic Trails and Scenic Routes  North National Park Service – Trails and Routes Map Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Site Location Ala Kahakai National Scenic Trail Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) Hawaiian Home Lands  North Bureau of Indian Affairs – Reservation Map Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Site Location Appendix C Site Photographs Site Photograph 1 – Looking north at the Site Site Photograph 2 – Looking east at the Site Site Photographs Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Photographed: March 5, 2024 Site Photograph 3 – Looking south at the Site Site Photograph 4 – Looking west away from the Site Site Photographs Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Photographed: March 5, 2024 Appendix D Documentation of Officially Designated Wilderness Areas, Wildlife Preserves and Endangered Species N/A Appendix E Section 106 Review State Historic Preservation Division HRS 6E Submittal Form Per §6E, Hawaiʻi Revised Statutes, if the Project requires review by the State Historic Preservation Division (SHPD), please review and fill out this form and submit all requested information to SHPD. Please submit this form and project documentation electronically to: dlnr.intake.shpd@hawaii.gov If you are unable to submit electronically, please contact SHPD at (808) 692-8015. Mahalo. The submission date of this form is: 1. APPLICANT (select one) ☐ Property Owner ☐ Government Agency 2. AGENCY (select one) ☐ Planning Department ☐ Department of Public Works ☐ Other (specify): Type of Permit Applied For: 3. APPLICANT CONTACT 3.1) Name: 3.2) Title: 3.3) Street Address: 3.4) County: 3.5) State: 3.6) Zip Code: 3.7) Phone: 3.8) Email: 4. PROJECT DATA 4.1) Permit Number (if applicable): 4.2) TMK [e.g. (3) 1-2-003:004]: 4.3) Street Address: 4.4) County: 4.5) State: 4.6) Zip Code: 4.7) Total Property Acreage: 4.8) Project Area (acreage, square feet): 4.9) List any previous SHPD correspondence (LOG Number & DOC Number, if applicable): LOG NO. DOC NO. 5. PROJECT INFORMATION 5.1) Does the Project involve a Historic Property? A Historic Property is any building, structure, object, 4 4 Amanda Wrona 600 Project Scientist I 2121 W Chandler Boulevard, Suite 108, Chandler Maricopa 96740 73-4310 Huehue Street, Kailua-Kona TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 Hawaii 480-850-0575 HI AZ 85224 a.wrona@trileaf.com 23.6 district, area, or site, including heiau and underwater site, which is over 50 years old (HRS §6E-2). ☐ Yes ☐ No 5.2) The date(s) of construction for the historic property (building, structure, object, district, area, or site, including heiau and underwater site) is 5.3) Is the Property listed on the Hawaiʻi and or National Register of Historic Places? To check: http://dlnr.hawaii.gov/shpd/ ☐ Yes ☐ No 5.4) Detailed Project Description and Scope of Work: 5.5) Description of previous ground disturbance (e.g. previous grading and grubbing): 5.6) Description of proposed ground disturbance (e.g. # of trenches, Length x Width x Depth): 5.7) The Agency shall ensure whether historic properties are present in the project area, and, if so, it shall ensure that these properties are properly identified and inventoried. Identify all known historic properties: 5.8) Once a historic property is identified, then an assessment of significance shall occur. Integrity (check all that apply): ☐ Location ☐ Design ☐ Setting ☐ Materials ☐ Workmanship ☐ Feeling ☐ Association Criteria (check all that apply): ☐ a – associated with events that have made an important contribution to the broad patterns of our history ☐ b – associated with the lives of persons important in our past ☐ c – embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work of a master; or possess high artistic value ☐ d – have yielded, or is likely to yield, information important for research on prehistory or history ☐ e – have an important value to the Native Hawaiian people or to another ethnic group of the state due to associations with cultural practices once carried out or still carried out, at the property or due to associations with traditional beliefs, events, or oral accounts - - these associations being important to the group’s history and cultural identity 4 N/A Our client proposes to replace an existing 73-foot 6-inch wooden pole (overall height of 76 feet 11 inches) with a proposed 73-foot 6-inch monopole with an overall height of 75 feet. The new monopole and proposed associated equipment will be installed within the existing 30-foot by 29-foot 1-inch fenced compound lease area. There is no proposed ground disturbance outside of the existing lease area. A pole and lease area was already built. The site is currently a gravel covered fenced equipment compound. The new monopole and proposed associated equipment will be installed within the existing 30-foot by 29-foot 1-inch fenced compound lease area. There is no proposed ground disturbance outside of the lease area. None 4 5.9) The effects or impacts of a project on significant historic properties shall be determined by the agency. Effect Determination (select one): ☐ No Historic Properties Affected ☐ Effect, with Agreed Upon Mitigation Commitments (§6E-42, HRS) ☐ Effect, with Proposed Mitigation Commitments (§6E-8, HRS) 5.10) This project is (check all that apply, if applicable): ☐ an activity, or program funded in whole or in part under the direct or indirect jurisdiction of a Federal agency, including those carried out by or on behalf of a Federal agency; ☐ carried out with Federal financial assistance; and or ☐ requiring a Federal permit, license or approval. If any of these boxes are checked, then the Project may also be subject to compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). 6. PROJECT SUBMITTALS 6.1) Please submit a copy of the Tax Map Key (TMK) map 6.2) Please submit a copy of the property map showing the project area and indicate if the project area is smaller than the property area. 6.3) Please submit a permit set of drawings. A permit set is a set of drawings prepared and signed by a licensed architect or engineer and is at least 65% complete. 6.4) Are you submitting a survey? ☐ Yes ☐ No Specify Survey: 6.5) Did SHPD request the survey? ☐ Yes ☐ No If ‘Yes’, then please provide the date, SHPD LOG NO, and DOC NO: Date: LOG NO. DOC NO. 6.6) SURVEY REVIEW FEES. Fee for Review of Reports and Plans (§§13-275-4 and 284-4). A filing fee will be charged for all reports and plans submitted to our office for review. Please go to: http://dlnr.hawaii.gov/shpd/about/branches/archaeology/filing-fee-schedule/ A check payable to the Hawaii Historic Preservation Special Fund should accompany all reports or plans submitted. 6.7) Please submit color photos/images of the Historic Property (any building, structure, object, district, area, or site, including heiau and underwater site) that will be affected by the Project. 4 4 4 Historic Properties Review and Assessment 4 The following are the minimum number and type of color photographs required: Quantity Description 1-2 Street view(s) of the resource and surrounding area 1-2 Over view of exterior work area 1 exterior photo of the North elevation (if applicable) 1 exterior photo of the South elevation (if applicable) 1 exterior photo of the East elevation (if applicable) 1 exterior photo of the West elevation (if applicable) 1-2 interior photos(s) of areas affected (if applicable) CHECKLIST ☐ SHPD FORM 6E (this form) ☐ PROJECT SUBMITTALS (any requested documentation for items 6.1 - 6.7 of this form) ☐ FILING FEE FORM (if applicable) 4 4 2121 West Chandler Boulevard, Suite 108, Chandler, Arizona 85224 - 480.850.0575 - www.trileaf.com March 27, 2024 Hawaii State Historic Preservation Division Attn: Alan Downer, Administrator Kakuhihewa Building 601 Kamokila Boulevard, Room 555 Kapolei, Hawaii 96707 808-692-8015dlnr.intake@shpd@hawaii.gov RE: Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka / BU# 824947 – Trileaf Project #735423 73-4310 Huehue Street, Kailua-Kona, HI 96740, TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 Hawaii County, Kailua Quadrangle (USGS)Latitude: 19° 43’ 2.535” N, Longitude: 155° 55’ 22.965” WTMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 Dear Dr. Downer: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a Section 106 Review for a proposed wireless communications tower to be located at the above referenced property. Our client proposes to replace an existing 73-foot 6-inch wooden pole (overall height of 76 feet 11 inches) with a proposed 73-foot 6-inch monopole with an overall height of 75 feet. The new monopole and proposed associated equipment will be installed within the existing 30-foot by 29-foot 1-inch fenced compound lease area. There is no proposed ground disturbance outside of the existing leasearea. This site is surrounded by a forest. The antenna will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). In accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission, dated September 2004, a cultural resource investigation has been conducted. Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on, or within the view shed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Summary reports of this investigation, maps, photographs and other information are provided in the attached Form 621. As noted, no Historic Properties were identified in the APE for direct or visual effects, resulting in the finding that this project will have no effect on any National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) listed, eligible, or potentially eligible structures or sites. In addition, no archaeological sites or artifacts were encountered during the archaeological survey. We appreciate your co-operation in this regard and anticipate your concurrence with these findings. Please call me at (480)850-0575 or email a.wrona@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you foryour assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Amanda Wrona Project Scientist I FCC Form FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Approved by OMB 3060 – 1039 Notification Date: See instructions for File Number: public burden estimates General Information 1) (Select only one) ( ) NE – New UA – Update of Application WD – Withdrawal of Application 2) If this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application currently on file. File Number: Applicant Information 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 4) Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Contact Information 10) P.O. Box: And /Or 11) Street Address: 12) City: 13) State: 14) Zip Code: 15) Telephone Number: 16) Fax Number: 17) E-mail Address: Consultant Information 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 19) Name: Principal Investigator 20) First Name: 21) MI: 22) Last Name: 23) Suffix: 24) Title: Principal Investigator Contact Information 25) P.O. Box: And /Or 26) Street Address: 27) City: 28) State: 29) Zip Code: 30) Telephone Number: 31) Fax Number: 32) E-mail Address: Crown Castle 0013810239 Lisa Klingensmith 2000 Corporate Drive Cannonsburg PA 15317 (480)850-0575 0011724176 ASM Affiliates on behalf of Trileaf Corporation a.wrona@trileaf.com Matthew Clark Principal Investigator 507A E. Lanikaula St. Hilo HI 96720 (480)850-0575 (480)850-0578 a.wrona@trileaf.com 1 of 11 NE 621 FCC Form 621 Collocation (CO) Submission Packet 0011000506 7AM EST 03/28/2024 May 2014 Professional Qualification 33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards? ( ) Yes ( ) No 34) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) __________________________________________________________________________________________ Additional Staff 35) Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( ) Yes ( ) No If “YES,” complete the following: X X X 36) First Name: 37) MI: 38) Last Name: 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( ) Other (Specify) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 2 of 11 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Site Information Tower Construction Notification System 1) TCNS Notification Number: ____________________________ Site Information 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: ( ) Yes ( ) No 3) Site Name: 4) Site Address: 5) Detailed Description of Project: 6) City: 7) State: 8) Zip Code: 9) County/Borough/Parish: 10) Nearest Crossroads: 11) NAD 83 Latitude (DD-MM-SS.S): ( ) N or ( ) S 12) NAD 83 Longitude (DD-MM-SS.S): ( ) E or ( ) W Collocation Information 13) Antennas will be located on (Select One): ( ) Communications Tower (Select One): ( ) Guyed Lattice Tower ( ) Self-supporting Lattice ( ) Monopole ( ) Other (Describe): ______________________________________________________________ ( ) Non-Tower Structure (Describe Structure): ________________________________________________________________________________ 14) Tower height above ground level (including top-mounted attachments such as lightning rods): ___________________ ( ) Feet ( ) Meters 15) Description of Antennas to be collocated (e.g. number, type, shape, dimensions, color): 16) Will the Antennas be placed at multiple levels on the structure? If “Yes”, describe placement: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ If “No”, specify the height of collocation above ground: ___________________ ( ) Feet ( ) Meters ( ) Yes ( ) No 17) Structure Completion Year: _____________________ (YYYY) ( ) Check here if your year provided is approximate. Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street Kailua-Kona HI HAWAII Kaloko Drive and Huehue Street 19-43-02.5 155-55-23.0 X X 22.9 X Proposed antennas will be collocated at a centerline height of 71 feet 275983 X X X 75.0 X 2010 3 of 11 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Our client proposes to replace an existing 73'6" wooden pole (overall height 76'11") w/ a new 73'6" monopole w/ an overall height of 75'. New monopole & new associated equip. will be installed w/in an existing 30'x29'1" lease area. X X 96740 18) Has the Communications Tower or Non-Tower Structure been the subject of SHPO/THPO review? If “Yes”, specify the following: Company that made the submission: ______________________________________________________________ Date submitted: __________________ SHPO/THPO Reference Number: _____________________ ( ) Yes ( ) No 19) Is the Communications Tower or Non-Tower Structure eligible for listing on the National Register? ( ) Yes ( ) No Collocation Status 20) Current Collocation Status (Select One): ( ) Construction and/or installation has not yet commenced ( ) Construction and/or installation has commenced, but is not completed Construction and/or installation commenced on: _______________ ( ) Construction has been completed Construction and/or installation commenced on: _______________ Construction and/or installation completed on: _______________ Determination of Effect 21) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 22) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE X X X FCC Form 621 4 of 11 May 2014 X X Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual effects? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ___________________ Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes/NHOs: _________________ 275983 1 X 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Contact Name 5) First Name: 6) MI: 7) Last Name: 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Dates & Response 10) Date Contacted ______________ 11) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Office of Hawaiian Affairs 02/01/2024 X Kai Markell Compliance Enforcement Manager 5 of 11 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Other Tribes/NHOs Contacted Tribe/NHO Information 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Contact Name 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: Contact Information 8) P.O. Box: And /Or 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted _______________ 18) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other 6 of 11 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Historic Properties Properties Identified 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? ( ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of cultural or religious significance to Tribes/NHOs? ( ) Yes ( ) No 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? If “Yes”, you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. ( ) Yes ( ) No Historic Property 4) Property Name: 5) SHPO Site Number: Property Address 6) Street Address: 7) City: 8) State: 9) Zip Code: 10) County/Borough/Parish: Status & Eligibility 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: _______________________________________________________________________________________ ( ) Yes ( ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: _______________________________________________________________________________________ ( ) Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes ( ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE X X X 7 of 11 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Local Government Involvement Local Government Agency 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Contact Name 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: Contact Information 8) P.O. Box: And /Or 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 17) Date Contacted _______________ 18) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Additional Information 19) Information on local government’s role or interest (optional): County of Hawaii Planning Department Alex Roy Certified Local Government Coordinator 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo HI 96720 (808)961-8140 alex.roy@hawaiicounty.gov X 02/05/2024 X 8 of 11 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Other Consulting Parties Other Consulting Parties Contacted 1) Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? ( ) Yes ( ) No Consulting Party 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: Contact Name 4) First Name: 5) MI: 6) Last Name: 7) Suffix: 8) Title: Contact Information 9) P.O. Box: And /Or 10) Street Address: 11) City: 12) State: 13) Zip Code: 14) Telephone Number: 15) Fax Number: 16) E-mail Address: 17) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail ( ) Letter ( ) Both Dates & Response 18) Date Contacted _______________ 19) Date Replied _______________ ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest ( ) Replied/Other Additional Information 20) Information on other consulting parties’ role or interest (optional): X Historic Hawaii Foundation To Whom It May Concern 680 Iwilei Road, Suite 690 Honolulu HI 96817 (808)523-2900 member@historichawaii.org X 02/05/2024 X 9 of 11 FCC Form 621 May 2014 Designation of SHPO/THPO 1) Designate the Lead State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) based on the location of the tower/collocation. SHPO/THPO Name: ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 2) You may also designate up to three additional SHPOs/THPOs if the APEs include multiple states. If the APEs include other countries, enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provincial Historic Preservation Agency SHPO/THPO Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________________ SHPO/THPO Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________________ SHPO/THPO Name: ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Certification I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 621 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete. Party Authorized to Sign First Name: MI: Last Name: Suffix: Signature: Date: _______________ FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID. WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND/OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND/OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 10 of 11 FCC Form 621 State Historic Preservation Office (Hawaii) Amanda Wrona 03/27/2024 Amanda Wrona May 2014 Attachments : Type Description Date Entered Resumes/Vitae Resumes 03/27/2024 Map Documents Maps 03/27/2024 Area of Potential Effects APE 03/27/2024 Tribal/NHO Involvement Tribal 03/27/2024 Local Government Involvement CLG 03/27/2024 Public Involvement PN 03/27/2024 Historic Properties for Visual Effects Historic Properties for Visual Effects 03/27/2024 Historic Properties for Direct Effects Historic Properties for Direct Effects 03/27/2024 Photographs Photographs 03/27/2024 Other ITC 03/27/2024 State-Specific Forms SHPO packet 03/27/2024 FCC Form 621 May 2014 11 of 11 CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 1. Consultant Information Provide a current copy of the resume or curriculum vitae for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions presented in this filing. A current copy of the resume for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing, or conclusions presented in this filing. Matthew R. Clark, M.A. Senior Archaeologist, Co-Director ASM Affiliates-Hilo Total Year of Experience: 25 Education M.A.2017/Cultural Heritage Management/University of Hawai‘i-Hilo B.A.1998/Anthropology/University of Vermont, Burlington Employment History 2023-present Director, ASM Affiliates, Hilo, Hawai‘i and Kahului, Maui 2017-2023 Director, ASM Affiliates, Hilo, Hawai‘i 2013-2017 Senior Archaeologist, ASM Affiliates, Hilo, Hawai‘i 2000-2013 Archaeologist, Rechtman Consulting, LLC, Hilo, Hawai‘i 1998-2000 Archaeologist, Holman and Associates, San Francisco, CA Professional Profile Matthew R. Clark, M.A., is the Director of ASM’s Hilo and Kahului offices and a Senior Archaeologist. He has 25 years of professional archaeological experience, 23 of those years spent in Hawai‘i. He has worked on projects throughout the Hawaiian Islands, and has also participated in projects in Vermont, California, Iowa, New Jersey, and Anguilla, British West Indies. Well-versed in all aspects of archaeology, Mr. Clark has extensive experience in general project, field, and laboratory management including, but not limited to, inventory and reconnaissance surveys, preservation planning, burial treatment planning, data recovery, site testing, excavation, archaeological monitoring, feature restoration, artifact identification and cataloguing, site recordation, GIS, community consultation, record searches, historical background research, Section 106 compliance, ethnographic studies, and technical report writing. Mr. Clark earned his Master of Arts degree in Heritage Management in 2017 from the University of Hawai‘i at Hilo. His Master’s thesis explored Kanaka Maoli trail systems in the Ka‘ū region of Hawai‘i Island, and focused on incorporating community heritage values into the management of cultural landscapes. Mr. Clark is identified as a Principal Archaeologist on ASM’s Permit to Conduct Archaeological Studies in the State of Hawai‘i issued by the State Historic Preservation Division. In 2021, he was appointed to a 5-year term on the Hawaiʻi County Cultural Resources Commission where he currently serves as the chair of the Investigative Sub-committee of SHPD-approved Preservation Plans. Awards/Commissions Phi Beta Kappa, University of Vermont (1998). Graduated Cum Laude from the University of Vermont (1998). Member of the Hawaiʻi County Cultural Resources Commission (5-year term: 2021-2026) Professional Memberships Society for Hawaiian Archaeology Master’s Thesis 2017 Crossing the ʻAʻā: Connecting Cultural Landscapes and Community Values Along the Kula Kai Trails of Hīlea, Kaʻū, Hawaiʻi, Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaiʻi at Hilo. (link to PDF copy of thesis) Selected technical Reports and Projects Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of the County of Hawaiʻi’s 3,128-acre PONC Kahuku Coastal Property, Kahuku Ahupua‘a, Ka‘ū District, island of Hawai‘i. Directed a field crew during the reconnaissance of the entire roughly 3,100-acre property and was the primary author of the reconnaissance survey report (2020). Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey in support of an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Planned Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) Honokōwai Community. Served as field director and co- author for an archaeological reconnaissance of 777 acres in Honokōwai Ahupua‘a, Lahaina District, Island Clark, CV 2 of Maui. Conducted background research and preliminary documentation of cultural features located on the property and provided recommendations to DHHL regarding the documentation and treatment of those resources within the context of the proposed development (2019). Archaeological Inventory Survey of the planned Kukuiola and Village 9 developments within the Villages at La‘i‘Ōpua urban planned community in Kealakehe Ahupua‘a, North Kona District, Island of Hawai‘i. Directed a field crew in the survey of a 35.774-acre State-owned parcel and the recordation of archaeological features located therein to update the findings of an earlier archaeological inventory survey and was the primary author responsible for report preparation (2019). Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of Kamehameha Schools Lands in Keawanui and Ka‘amola Ahupuaʻa, Kona District, Island of Moloka‘i. Served as field director and co-author for an archaeological reconnaissance of roughly 440 acres and provided preliminary documentation of archaeological sites in an effort to support KS planning efforts (2019). Kamehameha Schools Coastal Punalu‘u Archaeological Reconnaissance Project. Directed a field crew and co-author for the archaeological reconnaissance of roughly 300 acres of a coastal ‘a‘ā flow in the Ka‘ū District of Hawai‘i Island and provided preliminary documentation of archaeological sites in an effort to support KS planning efforts (2018). Archaeological Inventory Survey of a roughly 1,600 acre property in Kī‘olokū, Hi‘ona‘ā, and Honu‘apo ahupua‘a, Ka‘ū District, Island of Hawai‘i. Directed a field crew in the survey of the property and the recordation of archaeological features located therein. Conducted historical research at the Edmund Olson Trust Archive in Pāpa‘ikou, and was the primary author responsible for report preparation (2017). An Updated Archaeological Inventory Survey for the County of Hawai‘i Owned Lands at Kaiholena 1st and 2nd ahupua‘a, North Kohala District, Island of Hawai‘i. Directed a field crew, recorded roughly 300 archaeological features, and collected GPS data for each feature to aid in the creation of a GIS management tool to be used by the agency landowner (2016). Archaeological Inventory Survey of a roughly 210-acre portion of the NELHA HOST Park situated North of Makako Bay Drive ‘O‘oma 1st and Kalaoa 5th ahupua‘a, North Kona District, Island of Hawai‘i. Directed a field crew in the documentation of over 300 archaeological features and the collection of GPS and served as the primary author of the AIS report (2015). Archaeological Survey of a Proposed Remote Ungulate Fence at the Kaiholena Unit of The Nature Conservancy’s Ka‘ū Preserve, Hīlea Nui, Ka‘ū, Island of Hawai‘i. Conducted a pedestrian survey of a roughly 2.85-mile long by 15-foot wide corridor for the proposed remote fence line within the Ka‘ū Forest Reserve. Conducted historical research and prepared an archaeological compliance report for the study (2014). Archaeological Inventory Survey of a 35.5-acre Parcel Located at Pohoiki Bay, County of Hawai‘i, Pohoiki and Keahialaka ahupua‘a, Puna District, Island of Hawai‘i, 2014. Directed a field crew in the survey of the property and the recordation of archaeological features located therein. Also conducted historical research and cultural interviews and served as the primary author of the AIS report (2014). An Archaeological Inventory Survey for the Proposed Expansion of the County Park at Honu‘apo. Directed a field crew in the survey of the study area and the recordation of archaeological features located in Honu‘apo and Hiona‘ā ahupua‘a, Ka‘ū District, Island of Hawai‘i. Also responsible for historical research and drafting the AIS report (2013). References: Robert B. Rechtman, ASM Affiliates, (808) 969-6066 Kathleen Kawelu, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo Anthropology Department, (808) 333-6717 Peter Mills, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo Anthropology Department, (808) 932-7268 Sean Naleimaile, DLNR State Historic Preservation Division, (808) 640-5699 AMANDA WRONA PROJECT SCIENTIST Education Biological Sciences, B. S. Arizona State University / Tempe, AZ Areas of Expertise Ms. Amanda Wrona has experience performing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews for wireless telecommunications projects. Environmental service expertise includes: Information Section 7 Consultation National Wetland Inventory Maps Flood Insurance Rate Maps Critical Habitat Maps Soil Characterization Field Reconnaissance Section 106 Compliance NEPA Environmental Assessments Form 620/621 Submittals Local Government Consultation Native American Consultation Professional Resume CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 2. Site Information – Photographs You are required to provide photographs and maps as part of this filing. Additional site information can be provided in an optional attachment. Photograph Requirements: Except in cases where no Historic Properties were identified within the Areas of Potential Effects, submit photographs as described below. Photographs should be in color, marked so as to identify the project, keyed to the relevant map or text, and dated; the focal length of the lens and the height of the camera should be noted. The source of any photograph included but not taken by the Applicant or its consultant (including copies of historic images) should be identified on the photograph. a.Photographs taken from the site should show views from the proposed location in all directions. The direction (e.g., north, south, etc.) should be indicated on each photograph, and, as a group, the photographs should present a complete (360 degree) view of the area around the proposed site. Please see attached photographs, which were taken by Matthew R. Clark, M.A., A Secretary of the Interior qualified archaeologist with ASM Affiliates, contracted by Trileaf, during a field survey on March 5, 2024, unless otherwise noted. b.Photographs of all listed in and eligible properties within the Areas of Potential Effects. N/A c.If any listed or eligible properties are visible from the proposed site, photographs looking at the site from each historic property. The approximate distance in feet (meters) between the site and the historic property should be included. If any listed or eligible properties are within the APE, photos looking at each historic property should be included. N/A Aerial photographs of the site were obtained using Google Earth and are dated to 2018. Please refer to Appendix C for Site Photographs CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 3. Site Information – Map Requirements Include one or more 7.5-minute quad USGS topographical maps that: a.Identify the Areas of Potential Effects for both Direct and Visual Effects. If a map is copied from the original, include a key with the name of quad and date. b.Show the location of the proposed site and any access roads or other easements including excavations. c.Show the locations of each property listed. d.Include keys for any symbols, colors, or other identifiers. e.Submit color maps whenever possible. The following maps have been attached to this report: Topographic Map (2017) Topographic Map with Location of Direct APE and Visual APE Aerial Map with Location of Direct APE and Visual APE Please refer to Appendix B for Site Maps CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 4. Site Information – Additional Site Information Describe any additional structures, access roads, utility lines, fences, easements, or other construction planned for the site. Crown Castle proposes to replace an existing 73-foot 6-inch wooden pole (overall height of 76 feet 11 inches) with a proposed 73-foot 6-inch monopole with an overall height of 75 feet. The new monopole and proposed associated equipment will be installed within the existing 30-foot by 29-foot 1-inch fenced compound lease area. There is no proposed ground disturbance outside of the existing lease area. This site is surrounded by a forest. The construction drawings provided by Crown Castle are included in this attachment. Please refer to Appendix A for Site Plans CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 5. Area of Potential Effects You are required to provide two attachments regarding the Determination of Effect: Areas of Potential Effect and Mitigation of Effect (if applicable). Areas of Potential Effect Guidelines: a.Describe the APE for direct effects and explain how this APE was determined. Under the NPA for FCC Projects, the Direct APE (APE-DE) “is defined as the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof that will be physically altered or destroyed by the undertaking” (FCC 2004). On November 24, 2008, the FCC further clarified that the APE-DE is limited to the tower or non-tower structure on which the collocation will be mounted as well as the lease area including the access route and utility corridor. The APE-DE for this project consists of 600 square-foot lease area in the northeastern corner of a 23.6-acre privately owned TMK parcel. b.Describe the APE for visual effects and explain how this APE was determined. Per the NPA, the Visual APE (APE-VE) is the “geographic area in which the project has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character-defining feature of a historic property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)” (FCC 2004). The presumed APE-VE for construction of new facilities is the area from where the tower will be visible: a. Within a ½ mile from the tower site if the proposed tower is 200 feet or less in height; b. Within ¾ of a mile from the tower site if the proposed tower is more than 200 but no more than 400 feet in overall height; or c. Within 1½ miles from the tower site if the proposed tower is more than 400 feet in overall height. Due to the height of the proposed installation (75-feet), the presumed APE for visual effects for this project is a 0.5-mile radius from the subject property. CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 5. Continued Mitigation of Effect Guidelines: In the case of where an Adverse Visual Effect or Adverse Direct Effect has been determined you must provide the following: a.Copies of any correspondence and summaries of any oral communication with the SHPO/THPO and any consulting parties. N/A b.Describe any alternatives that have been considered that might avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects. Explain the Applicant’s conclusion regarding the feasibility of each alternative. N/A For each property identified as a Historic Property in the online e-106 form: a.Indicate whether the Applicant believes the proposed undertaking would have a) no effect; b) no adverse effect; or, c) an adverse effect. Explain how each such assessment was made. Provide supporting documentation where necessary. There were no recorded HRHP, NHRP, or determined eligible resources located within the APE for direct effects or the 0.5-mile APE for visual effects. No archaeological artifacts were encountered during the field survey. Thus, the proposed undertaking (T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/ HI04193B Collocation) will have No Effect on Historic Properties within either the Visual APE or the Direct APE. No additional cultural resources work is deemed necessary. Please see the attached Cultural Resources Assessment. March 22, 2024 Alan Downer, Ph.D. Deputy SHPO and SHPD Administrator Department of Land and Natural Resources State Historic Preservation Division 601 Kamokila Blvd., Suite 555 Kapolei, HI 96707 Subject: Historic Properties Review and Assessment to Accompany FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Collocation Submission Packet (FCC Form 621) for the Proposed T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/ HI04193B Collocation Upgrade, Kaloko Ahupuaʻa, North Kona District, Island of Hawaiʻi, TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Dear Alan: At the request of Trileaf, on behalf of Crown Castle, ASM Affiliates (ASM) conducted an historic properties review and assessment for the proposed modification of an existing telecommunications facility within a portion of Tax Map Key (TMK): (3) 7-3-048:003 and located at 73-4310 Huehue St., North Kona district, Island of Hawaiʻi (Figures 1, 2, and 3). Crown Castle in conjunction with T-Mobile proposes to make modifications to an existing wireless telecommunications facility within an existing 30’ x 29’1” fenced compound lease area (Figure 4). The current study was conducted in accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement (PA) for the Collocation of Wireless Antennas executed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the National Conference of State Historic Preservation Officers (NCSHPO), and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP); and the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement For Review Of Effects On Historic Properties For Certain Undertakings Approved By The Federal Communications Commission (September 2004). The current document is to be included as part of the FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Collocation Submission Packet (FCC Form 621). This report was prepared to meet the requirements of the FCC’s environmental rules (47 Code of Federal Regulations [C.F.R.] § 1.1301-1.1319) and Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). The proposed undertaking, known as the T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/ HI04193B collocation project (Figures 5 and 6), consists of the following modifications to an existing unmanned telecommunications monopole tower: four antennae will be removed, 2 TMA’s will be removed, 8 coax cables will be removed, 4 RRHs will be installed, two 1-5/8 Hybrid cables will be installed, the installation of one 6160 support cabinet, one B160 battery cabinet, one AAV cabinet, and one new steel monopole, and the removal of one wood pole, one BBU cabinet, two RRUS11 B2 RRUs, two radio 4449 B71+B85, and two triplexers. The three (3) proposed equipment cabinets will be installed on an existing 4’x 7’concrete pad, an existing 10’ x 20’ pad, and an existing 6’ x 6’ 2” concrete pad. The four (4) additional antennas will be added at a top height of 75’. Ground disturbance will be limited to the installation of the new steel monopole within the existing wireless communication facility. The Direct APE is located roughly 5,000 feet above sea level. It is situated within a 600 square-foot lease area in the northeastern corner of a 23.6-acre privately owned TMK parcel (see Figure 2). ASM conducted a field inspection of the Direct APE and background research to determine whether historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or the Hawai‘i Register of Historic Places (HRHP) exist within the Direct APE or within the 0.5-mile Area of Potential Effects for Visual Effects (visual APE) (see Figure 3). T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 2 of 15 Culture-Historical Context The Direct APE is located within Kaloko Ahupuaʻa which is situated in the moku (district) of Kona and is the western most district on Hawai‘i Island. More specifically, the Direct APE is within the Kona ‘Ākau (North Kona) region that was traditionally extended from Keahualono at its northern end to Pu‘uohau at its southern end (Pukui 1983). This region of North Kona was known for its barren coastal region and was called “Kekaha wai ‘ole o nā Kona,” explained by Pukui (1983:185) as the “waterless Kekaha of the Kona district.” This region has also been subject to volcanic forces and has been covered on multiple occasions by lava flows. The Direct APE is situated on the 1800-1801 Kaʻūpūlehu ʻaʻā flow that emanated from Hualālai Volcano. An important feature of the Kehaha region in Precontact times was the coastline, which contains numerous shallow bays, some of which were transformed by the ancient people into fishponds. Kaloko Ahupua‘a has been literally defined by Pukui et al. (1974:78) as “the pond,” and is likely a reference to the famed fishpond located at the coast. Early residents of Kaloko mostly inhabited the coastal portion of the ahupuaʻa where marine resources could be easily exploited. By the 17th and 18th century, Kaloko had a sizable population concentrated at the coast in complexes containing a large heiau, a fishpond, a cemetery, and the residence of a high chief (Puette and Dye 2003). Although Kaloko is situated in the waterless lands of Kekaha, legendary (Maguire 1966) and archaeological evidence (Wolforth et al. 2005) confirms that the upland portion of the ahupuaʻa was a part of an extensive agricultural system that extended across the leeward slopes of Hualālai and Mauna Loa where rainfall was high, and the soils were enriched with volcanic ash (Kirch and McCoy 2023). This agricultural field system, known as the Kona Field System extended from Kaū Ahupuaʻa to the north of Kaloko, south to Hoʻokena Ahupuaʻa (Cordy 1995; Horrocks and Rechtman 2009), with most intensive agricultural occurring between 150-1,200-foot elevation where there was adequate soil and rainfall. The coastal inhabitants utilized mauka/makai trails to access fertile upland agricultural areas. The Direct APE, while not within an area that was utilized for agriculture, is within a vegetation zone known as the wao zone (3,000 feet in elevation and above), an area utilized by early Hawaiians for gathering forest resources. The wao had several divisions, including the wao kanaka (sometimes referred to as the ʻamaʻu) which was the area most accessible to humans, the wao kele, where giant trees and tree ferns grew, and the wao akua, a place of supernatural power, the realm of gods, a place humans seldom ventured. Hard woods, kukui nuts, pandanus leaves, māmaki tree bark, sandalwood, and other materials, were gathered in the wao kanaka (Handy and Handy 1972:56). The population of Kaloko Ahupuaʻa declined after European contact, and by the 1830s the shoreline population had dwindled in favor of agricultural and ranching pursuits between 1,200 and 1,700 feet of elevation, with some agricultural activity taking place at higher elevations (Nees and Williams 1995). The TMK parcel in which the Direct APE is located was, according to county tax records, previously owned by John Avery Maguire and the Mauna Loa Cattle Corporation, indicating possible ranching land use prior to its current residential land use. Literature Review Results Previous archaeological studies have addressed the mauka extent of Kona Field System features in the Upland-Forest Zone (2,000 to 5,600 feet elevation) of Kaloko Ahupuaʻa. Cordy et al. (1991) reported that the formal agricultural fields in Kaloko Ahupuaʻa did not extend above the 2,300-foot elevation, and between that elevation and 3,400 feet only scattered agricultural features were identified. Their field study included a reconnaissance survey of 100-meter by 100-meter sample units stratified by elevation, and the highest sample unit (4,000 feet elevation) that they investigated was found to be culturally sterile. Additionally, a mauka-makai oriented transect between the 3,000- and 5,600-foot elevation was also culturally sterile. Writing of the Kaloko Mauka subdivision area in general, Cordy et al. (1991:445) concluded that the “low density of remains, and the nature of remains, strongly suggest that the forest in this area was not extensively cleared, but rather was cut in small patches.” T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 3 of 15 Cordy et al.’s (1991) model describing limited use of the Upland Forest Zone in Kaloko has been supported by several archaeological studies conducted makai of the study parcel. No historic properties have been observed during archaeological investigations from 4,600 to 2,400 feet (Barna 2020, 2022; Barrera 1998; Rechtman 1998, 2003, 2015a, 2015b; Rechtman and Rivera 2002). An inventory survey by Puette and Dye (2003) recorded no archaeological sites on a parcel located between 2,100 and 2,400 feet elevation, but field inspections by Rosendahl (1989a, 1989b, 1993) of three parcels below the 2,200 foot contour identified four sites. The sites include a small terrace, a modified outcrop, modified lava tube, and rock alignments and mounds. All of these sites were interpreted as either of recent origin or agriculturally related, and no further work was conducted at any of these sites. Nees and Williams (1995) encountered lava tubes with Hawaiian burials, but also at these lower elevations of the Upland-Forest Zone. It should also be noted that no archaeological features were reported on the 1800-1801 Ka‘ūpūlehu ʻaʻā flow in any of these previous studies. A review of DLNR-SHPD records for Kaloko Mauka parcels located above 2,400 feet indicates that no other archaeological sites, features, or deposits have been reported above that elevation. Therefore, while Cordy et al.’s (1991) model seems to hold for the lowest elevations of the Kaloko Mauka subdivision, their findings above 2,400 feet remain uncorroborated. Results of Field Inspection of Direct APE On March 5, 2024, Matthew R. Clark, M.A. (Principal Investigator), conducted an archaeological field inspection of the Direct APE (Figures 7 through 10). The lease area is enclosed by a chain link fence, with direct access being provided through a driveway via Huehue Street along the southern edge of the Direct APE. No historic properties of any kind were observed during the field inspection. Results of Background Research for 0.5-mile Radius Visual APE On March 4, 2024, ASM conducted a search of relevant records on file with the SHPO/DLNR-SHPD for information on previously identified historic properties that are listed in or eligible for listing in the NRHP or HRHP. The results of the literature search indicate that there are no such historic properties located within the visual APE. Determination of Effect The current study has identified no NRHP-listed or eligible historic properties within the Direct APE or the 0.5-mile visual APE. Thus, the proposed undertaking (T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/ HI04193B Collocation) will have no effect on historic properties within either the visual APE or the direct APE. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me directly. Sincerely, Matthew R. Clark, M.A. Principal Investigator T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 4 of 15 References Cited Barna, B. 2020 Archaeological Field Inspection of in support of a County of Hawaii Grubbing Permit for Khanittha Gault property, TMK:(3) 7-3-026:011, Kaloko, North Kona, Hawai‘i. ASM Affiliates Project 35340.00. Prepared for Khanittha Gault. 2022 An archaeological field inspection in support of the Proposed Subdivision of the Sunshine Holdings LLC property, TMK:(3) 7-3-025:012, Kaloko, North Kona, Hawai‘i. ASM Affiliates Project Number 41290.00. Prepared for Micah Christensen. Barrera, W., Jr. 1998 Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of a 20 Acre Property, TMK: 7-3-25:14 in Kaloko Ahupuaa, North Kona, Island of Hawaii. Chiniago, Inc. Revised 1998. Cordy, R. 1995 Central Kona Archaeological Settlement Patterns. State Historic Preservation Division, DLNR, State of Hawaii. Revised 1995. Prepared for Planning Department, County of Hawaii. Cordy, R., J. Tainter, R. Renger, and R. Hitchcock 1991 An Ahupuaʻa Study: The 1971 Archaeological Work at Kaloko Ahupuaʻa, North Kona, Island of Hawaiʻi. Western Archaeological and Conservation Center Publications in Anthropology 8. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Tucson, AZ. Handy, E. S. C. and E. G. Handy 1972 Native Planters in Old Hawaii: Their Life, Lore, and Environment. Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin 233. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Horrocks, M. and R. B. Rechtman (CrossRef) 2009 Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and banana (Musa sp.) microfossils in deposits from the Kona Field System, Island of Hawaii. Journal of Archaeological Science 36 (5):1115- 1126. Electronic document, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0305440308003221, accessed 2017/12/30/01:17:23. Kirch, P. V. and M. D. McCoy 2023 Feathered Gods and Fishhooks: The Archaeology of Ancient Hawaiʻi. Revised ed. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. Maguire, E. 1966 Kona Legends. Second ed. Petroglyph Press, Hilo. Nees, R. and S. Williams 1995 Archaeological Investigations in Five Parcels of the Kaloko Mauka Subdivision, Kaloko Ahupuaʻa, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Ogden Environmental and Energy Co., Inc. Prepared for Dennis Haserot. Puette, S. and T. S. Dye 2003 Archaeological Inventory Survey for Kaloko Mauka Parcel, Hawaiʻi Island. T.S. Dye & Colleagues. Revised 2003. Prepared for Roy E. King, Jr. Pukui, M. K. (editor) 1983 ʻŌlelo Noʻeau: Hawaiian proverbs & poetical sayings. Bishop Museum Press, Honolulu. Pukui, M. K., S. H. Elbert, and E. Moʻokini 1974 Place Names of Hawaii. Revised and Expanded ed. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 5 of 15 Rechtman, R. B. 1998 Archaeological Field Inspection, Kaloko Mauka Parcel (TMK: 3-7-3-25:15), Kaloko Ahupuaʻa, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii. Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph. D., Inc. 1925- 120398. Revised 1998. Prepared for Jim Cardin. 2003 Archaeological Assessment Survey of TMK: 3-7-3-26:5 in Kaloko Mauka, Kaloko Ahupuaʻa, North Kona District, Island of Hawaiʻi. Rechtman Consulting, LLC RC-0173. Revised 2003. Prepared for Roger Weiss, Kailua-Kona, HI. 2015a Archaeological Field Inspection of TMK: (3) 7-3-026:003, Kaloko Ahupuaʻa North Kona, Island of Hawaiʻi in Response to SHPD Comment Letter on Change of Zone Application. ASM Affiliates Letter Report Project Number 24700. Revised 2015. Prepared for DLNR- SHPD. 2015b Archaeological Field Inspection of TMK: (3) 7-3-048:001, Kaloko Ahupuaʻa North Kona, Island of Hawaiʻi in Support of a Change of Zoning Application. ASM Affiliates Letter Report Project Number 24800. Prepared for James Leonard, AICP, Hilo, HI. Rechtman, R. B. and M. E. Rivera 2002 Archaeological Assessment Survey of TMK: 3-7-3-26:4 in Kaloko Mauka, Kaloko Ahupuaʻa, North Kona District, Island of Hawaiʻi. Rechtman Consulting, LLC 0122. Revised 2002. Prepared for Geoffrey Newlon, Keaʻau HI. Rosendahl, P. H. 1989a Kaloko Mauka Parcel #1 Field Inspection, Land of Kaloko, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (TMK: 3-7-3-24:7). Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph. D., Inc. 615-060689. Revised 1989. Prepared for Sidney Fuke & Associates. 1989b Kaloko Mauka Parcel #2 Field Inspection, Land of Kaloko, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii (TMK: 3-7-3-24:8). Paul H. Rosendahl, Ph.D., Inc. report 620-060689. Revised 1989. Prepared for Sidney Fuke & Associates. 1993 Archaeological Field Inspection, Kaloko Mauka Parcel (TMK: 3-7-3-24:5), Land of Kaloko, North Kona District, Island of Hawaii 1358-022293. Revised 1993. Prepared for William Wilton. Wolforth, T., C. Monahan, K. Johnson, T. Paikuli-Campbell, and R. Spear 2005 Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Northern Portion of the Kaloko Heights Project in Kohanaiki and Kaloko Ahupuaʻa, North Kona District, Hawaiʻi Island, Hawaiʻi: Settlement Paterns Investigations in the Southern Kekaha Middle Elevations [TMK 3-7-3- 09:32]. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc. Project 455-2. Revised 2005. Prepared for Stanford Carr Development, LLC. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 6 of 15 Figures and Tables Figure 1. Location of the Direct APE and the Visual APE. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 7 of 15 Figure 2. TMK: (3) 7-3-048, showing the Direct APE, a portion of parcel 003. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 8 of 15 Figure 3. Satellite imagery showing the Direct APE and the Visual APE. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 9 of 15 Figure 4. Overall site plan for proposed T-Mobile HI104193B collocation project . T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 10 of 15 Figure 5. Final proposed site plan. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 11 of 15 Figure 6. Existing and final elevation drawings. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 12 of 15 Figure 7. Direct APE as seen from Huehue Street, view to the north. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 13 of 15 Figure 8. Direct APE, view to the east. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 14 of 15 Figure 9. Direct APE as seen from Huehue Street, view to the south. T-Mobile Kaloko Mauka/HI04193B TMK: (3) 7-3-048:003 (por.) Page 15 of 15 Figure 10. Direct APE as seen from Huehue Street, view to the west. CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 6. Tribal and NHO Involvement At an early stage in the planning process, the Nationwide Agreement requires the Applicant to gather information from appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (“NHOs”) to assist in the identification of Historic Properties of religious and cultural significance to them. Describe measures taken to identify Indian tribes and NHOs that may attach religious and cultural significance to Historic Properties that may be affected by the construction within the Areas of Potential Effects (“APE”) for direct and visual effects. If such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, list them and provide a summary of contacts by either the FCC, the Applicant, or the Applicant’s representative. Provide copies of relevant documents, including correspondence. If no such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, please explain. Trileaf Corporation completed the Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) on January 29, 2024 and received the notification of interested tribes on February 2, 2024. The attached FCC Notification email lists the Tribes identified through the TCNS process. A second notice will be sent to all interested tribes/organizations, after a period of 30 days and the consultation process will continue per the FCC’s guidelines. Any relevant comments from Tribes received by Trileaf will be forwarded to your office. 1 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Friday, February 2, 2024 2:02 AM To:Tribal Cc:tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Subject:NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #8765803 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organizaƟon. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal CommunicaƟons Commission's (FCC) Tower ConstrucƟon NoƟﬁcaƟon System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the noƟﬁcaƟon that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The informaƟon was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (leƩer). We note that the review period for all parƟes begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to SecƟon VII.A of the NPA and noƟﬁcaƟons that do not provide this serve as informaƟon only. Persons who have received the noƟﬁcaƟon that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally‐ recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska NaƟve Villages (collecƟvely "Tribal NaƟons"), NaƟve Hawaiian OrganizaƟons (NHOs), and State Historic PreservaƟon Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in idenƟfying the referenced Tribal NaƟons and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal NaƟon and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the lisƟng below. We note that Tribal NaƟons may have SecƟon 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locaƟons that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the NaƟonwide ProgrammaƟc Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic ProperƟes for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal CommunicaƟons Commission (NPA), all Tribal NaƟons and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this noƟﬁcaƟon, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construcƟon falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal NaƟon or NHO. (NPA, SecƟon IV.F.4). The noƟﬁcaƟon that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal NaƟons and NHOs. A Tribal NaƟon or NHO may not respond unƟl a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal NaƟon or NHO does not respond within a reasonable Ɵme, you should make a reasonable effort at follow‐up contact, unless the Tribal NaƟon or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, SecƟon IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal NaƟon or NHO does not respond to a follow‐up inquiry, or if a substanƟve or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal NaƟon or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, SecƟon IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18‐30). 1. Compliance Enforcement Manager Kai Markell ‐ Office of Hawaiian Affairs ‐ 560 N. Nimitz Hwy., Suite 200 Honolulu, HI ‐ OHACompliance@oha.org ‐ 808‐594‐0227 ‐ electronic mail and regular mail 2 Exclusions: The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) is not interested in reviewing TCNS projects that involve the replacement of exisƟng structures on rooŌops or buildings; the installaƟon of new structures on rooŌops or buildings; or, projects that do not involve ground disturbing work. The noƟﬁcaƟon that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The informaƟon was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their informaƟon and planning. You need make no effort at this Ɵme to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this noƟﬁcaƟon. Prior to construcƟon, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic PreservaƟon Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to SecƟon VII.A of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under SecƟon III D or E of the NPA. 2. Chairperson Suzanne D Case ‐ Department of Land & Natural Resources ‐ 1151 Punchbowl Street ‐ Room 220 Honolulu, HI ‐ suzanne.case@hawaii.gov; Russell.Y.Tsuji@hawaii.gov ‐ 808‐587‐0401 ‐ electronic mail 3. Deputy SHPO Theresa K Donham ‐ State Historic PreservaƟon Office (Hawaii) ‐ 601 Kamokila Blvd Room 555 Kapolei, HI ‐ theresa.k.donham@hawaii.gov ‐ 808‐692‐8015 ‐ electronic mail TCNS automaƟcally forwards all noƟﬁcaƟons to all Tribal NaƟons and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any addiƟonal process with that Tribal NaƟon or SHPO. In addiƟon, a parƟcular Tribal NaƟon or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain faciliƟes (for example, a statement that it does not review collocaƟons with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in parƟcipaƟng in pre‐construcƟon review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail noƟﬁcaƟon. If you learn that any of the above contact informaƟon is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following informaƟon relaƟng to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: NoƟﬁcaƟon Received: 01/29/2024 NoƟﬁcaƟon ID: 275983 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or EnƟty Name: Crown Castle Consultant Name: Crystal Macklin Street Address: 1515 Des Peres Rd. Ste 200 Suite 200 City: St. Louis State: MISSOURI Zip Code: 63131 Phone: 314‐997‐6111 Email: tribal@trileaf.com 3 Structure Type: MTOWER ‐ Monopole LaƟtude: 19 deg 43 min 2.5 sec N Longitude: 155 deg 55 min 23.0 sec W LocaƟon DescripƟon: 73‐4310 Huehue Street City: Kailua‐Kona State: HAWAII County: HAWAII Detailed DescripƟon of Project: Our client proposes to replace an exisƟng 73'6" wooden pole (overall height 76'11") w/ a new 73'6" monopole w/ an overall height of 75'. New monopole & new associated equip. will be installed w/in an exisƟng 30'x29'1" lease area. Ground ElevaƟon: 1511.0 meters Support Structure: 22.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 22.9 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 1533.9 meters above mean sea level If you have any quesƟons or comments regarding this noƟce, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: hƩps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=hƩps‐3A__www.fcc.gov_wireless_available‐2Dsupport‐ 2Dservices&d=DwIFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf‐ v5A_CdpgnVﬁiMM&r=tVy9dfE6fJUkHc15_Itk39MNoGtgWe1vmeedh3_FbFk&m=SJr4rVzshrKNUvTap6REz9VT8UruzzsiOlj Nv‐6ZP9I4wtKgzLpyPHJ‐khTg3hsr&s=02sjxyHIUVdmX‐xXJde9lPmEqRcL2N_btzYcEdsnUt0&e= You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480‐3201 (TTY 717‐338‐2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal CommunicaƟons Commission ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint EssenƟals. Visit the following link to report this email as spam: hƩps://us1.proofpointessenƟals.com/app/report_spam.php?mod_id=11&mod_opƟon=logitem&report=1&type=easysp am&k=k1&payload=53616c7465645f5f255f8f55643c4a5e1ce189588117a381ad35b071a73d4d1527d5840c8b15319591 38b172f92fc3364699a79b29c46390315ab2d7101caefd5cc8592ef05edb31cee92050043cc33524bdf410969958338c979c 7221a51cdfcff64613ed559b39a0c9e542facbac34e50906bd5c05d34acba28cfa1d3e2cb3365c99f051186191f86bb3c0c86 722825b9f22fed17e924f4c61ed89a3a015ff CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 7. Historic Properties Direct Effects a.List all properties within the APE for direct effects. There are no historic properties identified within the APE-DE for the proposed project. b.Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for direct effects, not listed in part “a” (above), that the Applicant considers to be eligible for listing in the National Register as a result of the Applicant’s research. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). For each property that was specifically considered and determined not to be eligible, describe why it does not satisfy the criteria of eligibility. There are no additional properties in the APE for direct effects not listed in part “a.” c.Describe the techniques and the methodology, including any field survey, used to identify Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects.1 If no archeological field survey was performed, provide a report substantiating that: i) the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed construction depth (excluding footings and other anchoring mechanisms) by at least 2 feet; or, ii) geomorphological evidence indicates that cultural resource-bearing soils do not occur within the project area or may occur but at depths that exceed 2 feet below the proposed construction depth.2 ASM Archaeologists contracted through Trileaf performed this survey in response to the planned use of the above-described parcel and the potential impacts that such use might present to archaeological and architectural cultural resources. The Phase I cultural resource survey was designed to discover all prehistoric and historical period cultural resources that might be present within the project area. The field survey of the project area, which included a pedestrian survey, and visual inspection, yielded no evidence for the presence of archaeological resources within the APE. Additionally, no 1 Pursuant to Section VI.D.2.a. of the Nationwide Agreement, Applicants shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify above ground and archeological Historic Properties, including buildings, structures, and historic districts, that lie within the APE for direct effects. Such reasonable and good faith efforts may include a field survey where appropriate. 2 Under Section VI.D.2.d. of the Nationwide Agreement, an archeological field survey is required even if none of these conditions applies, if an Indian tribe or NHO provides evidence that supports a high probability of the presence of intact archeological Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects. CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka «SiteName» Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 NRHP-listed or eligible properties were identified within the proposed project’s Direct APE. No NRHP listed or eligible properties were identified within the Visual APE (0.5-mile radius). Based on these findings, Trileaf recommends: No Historic Properties in the APE-DE and the APE-VE. CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 8. Historic Properties Visual Effects Historic Properties Identified for Visual Effects Guidelines a.Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for visual effects that is listed in the National Register, has been formally determined eligible for listing by the Keeper of the National Register, or is identified as considered eligible for listing in the records of the SHPO/THPO, pursuant to Section VI.D.I.a. of the Nationwide Agreement. N/A b.Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each Historic Property in the APE for visual effects, not listed in part “a”, identified through the comments of Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public. Identify each individual or group whose comments led to the inclusion of a Historic Property in this attachment. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). As of the date of this report, Trileaf Corporation has not received comments from Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public that identify Historic Properties in the APE for visual effects. c.For any properties listed in the above Historic Properties list, that the Applicant considers no longer eligible for inclusion in the National Register, explain the basis for this recommendation. N/A CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka «SiteName» Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 9. Local Government a. If any local government has been contacted and invited to become a consulting party pursuant to Section V.A. of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, list the local government agencies contacted. Provide a summary of contacts and copies of any relevant documents (e.g., correspondence or notices). On February 5, 2024, Mr. Alex Roy with the County of Hawaii Planning Department was notified of the proposed project. He has been invited to comment on the proposed project’s potential effect on Historic Properties and to indicate whether he is interested in consulting further on the proposed project. A copy of Trileaf Corporation’s correspondence with the County of Hawaii Planning Department is attached. As of this date, no response has been received from Mr Roy. Should a response be received, a copy will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this packet. b. If a local government agency will be contacted but has not been to date, explain why and when such contact will take place. N/A 2121 West Chandler Boulevard, Suite 108, Chandler, Arizona 85224 - 480.850.0575 - www.trileaf.com February 5, 2024 County of Hawaii Planning Department Attn: Mr. Alex J. Roy, M.Sc., Certified Local Government Coordinator 101 Pauahi Street, Suite 3 Hilo, Hawaii 96720 Phone: 808-961-8140 Email: alex.roy@hawaiicounty.gov RE: Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka / BU# 824947 – Trileaf Project #735423 73-4310 Huehue Street, Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Hawaii County, Kailua Quadrangle (USGS)Latitude: 19° 43’ 2.535” N, Longitude: 155° 55’ 22.965” W Dear Mr. Roy: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a Section 106 Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to replace an existing 73-foot 6-inch wooden pole (overall height of 76 feet 11 inches) with a proposed 73-foot 6-inch monopole with an overall height of 75 feet. The new monopole and proposed associated equipmentwill be installed within the existing 30-foot by 29-foot 1-inch fenced compound lease area. There is no proposed ground disturbance outside of the existing lease area. This site is surrounded by a forest. The antenna will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower’s potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the Section 106 review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (480) 850-0575 or email a.wrona@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Amanda Wrona Project Scientist I CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 10. Other Consulting Parties and Public Notice List additional consulting parties that were invited to participate by the Applicant, or independently requested to participate. Provide any relevant correspondence or other documents. On February 5, 2024, the Historic Hawaii Foundation was notified of the proposed project. They were invited to comment on the proposed project’s potential effect on Historic Properties and to indicate whether they are interested in consulting further on the proposed project. A copy of Trileaf’s correspondence with the Historic Hawaii Foundation is attached. As of this date, no response has been received from the Historic Hawaii Foundation. Should a response be received, a copy will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this packet. You are required to provide a Public Notice Attachment. Attached, please find a copy of a legal notice regarding the proposed telecommunications tower construction that was posted in the West Hawaii Today on February 21, 2024. As of the date of this submission packet, no comments regarding this notice have been received by Trileaf Corporation. Should a response be received, copies will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this submission packet. 2121 West Chandler Boulevard, Suite 108, Chandler, Arizona 85224 - 480.850.0575 - www.trileaf.com February 5, 2024 Historic Hawaii Foundation 680 Iwilei Road, Suite 690 Honolulu, HI 96817 Phone: 808-523-2900 Email: member@historichawaii.org RE: Crown Castle – Kaloko Mauka / BU# 824947 – Trileaf Project #735423 73-4310 Huehue Street, Kailua-Kona, HI 96740 Hawaii County, Kailua Quadrangle (USGS) Latitude: 19° 43’ 2.535” N, Longitude: 155° 55’ 22.965” W To Whom It May Concern, Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a Section 106 Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to replace an existing 73-foot 6-inch wooden pole (overall height of 76 feet 11 inches) with a proposed 73-foot 6-inch monopole with an overall height of 75 feet. The new monopole and proposed associated equipment will be installed within the existing 30-foot by 29-foot 1-inch fenced compound lease area. There is no proposed ground disturbance outside of the existing lease area. This site is surrounded by a forest. The antenna will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower’s potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the Section 106 review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning/zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (480) 850-0575 or email a.wrona@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Amanda Wrona Project Scientist I CO SUBMISSION PACKET – FCC FORM 621 Approved by OMB 3060-1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant’s Name: Crown Castle Project Name: Kaloko Mauka «SiteName» Project Number: 735423 FCC Form 621 Attachment 11. SHPO Specific Forms The required cover sheet is attached at the beginning of this packet. From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov To:Amanda Wrona Subject:Section 106 New Filing Submitted- Email ID #9563918 Date:Wednesday, March 27, 2024 3:45:52 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The following new Section 106 filing has been submitted: File Number: 0011000506 TCNS Number: 275983 Purpose: Collocation Submission Packet Has the Communications Tower or Non-Tower Structure been the subject of SHPO/THPO review? No Notification Date: 7AM EST 03/28/2024 Applicant: Crown Castle Consultant: ASM Affiliates on behalf of Trileaf Corporation Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Kaloko Mauka Site Address: 73-4310 Huehue Street Detailed Description of Project: Our client proposes to replace an existing 73'6" wooden pole (overall height 76'11") w/ a new 73'6" monopole w/ an overall height of 75'. New monopole & new associated equip. will be installed w/in an existing 30'x29'1" lease area. Site Coordinates: 19-43-2.5 N, 155-55-23.0 W City: Kailua-Kona County: HAWAII State:HI Lead SHPO/THPO: State Historic Preservation Office (Hawaii) Consultant Contact Information: Name: ASM Affiliates on behalf of Trileaf Corporation Title: Principal Investigator PO Box: Address: 507A E. Lanikaula St. City: Hilo State: HI Zip: 96720 Phone: 480-850-0575 Fax: 480-850-0578 Email: a.wrona@trileaf.com NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system. Appendix F Native American Correspondence DateRequested InformationDate Sent Date CommentsOffice of Hawaiian Affairs3/28/2024Sent Letter & Form 620/6214/9/2024We now have enoughinformation to conclude that we have no concerns regarding this project.February 2, 2024FCC Start:FCC ReferralStanding Agreements & CommentsTribal Summary TableTribe TCNS auto-replyFollow Up Request from Tribe Follow Up(s) to Tribe Final ReplySite: Kaloko MaukaTCNS Number: 275983Site ID: 824947Page 1 of 1 1 From:towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent:Friday, February 2, 2024 2:02 AM To:Tribal Cc:tcnsweekly@fcc.gov Subject:NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #8765803 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organizaƟon. Do not click links or open aƩachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Applicant: Thank you for using the Federal CommunicaƟons Commission's (FCC) Tower ConstrucƟon NoƟﬁcaƟon System (TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the noƟﬁcaƟon that you provided through TCNS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The informaƟon was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (leƩer). We note that the review period for all parƟes begins upon receipt of the Submission Packet pursuant to SecƟon VII.A of the NPA and noƟﬁcaƟons that do not provide this serve as informaƟon only. Persons who have received the noƟﬁcaƟon that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally‐ recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska NaƟve Villages (collecƟvely "Tribal NaƟons"), NaƟve Hawaiian OrganizaƟons (NHOs), and State Historic PreservaƟon Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in idenƟfying the referenced Tribal NaƟons and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal NaƟon and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the lisƟng below. We note that Tribal NaƟons may have SecƟon 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locaƟons that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the NaƟonwide ProgrammaƟc Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic ProperƟes for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal CommunicaƟons Commission (NPA), all Tribal NaƟons and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this noƟﬁcaƟon, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construcƟon falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal NaƟon or NHO. (NPA, SecƟon IV.F.4). The noƟﬁcaƟon that you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal NaƟons and NHOs. A Tribal NaƟon or NHO may not respond unƟl a full Submission Packet is provided. If, upon receipt, the Tribal NaƟon or NHO does not respond within a reasonable Ɵme, you should make a reasonable effort at follow‐up contact, unless the Tribal NaƟon or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, SecƟon IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal NaƟon or NHO does not respond to a follow‐up inquiry, or if a substanƟve or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal NaƟon or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, SecƟon IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Second Report and Order released on March 30, 2018 (FCC 18‐30). 1. Compliance Enforcement Manager Kai Markell ‐ Office of Hawaiian Affairs ‐ 560 N. Nimitz Hwy., Suite 200 Honolulu, HI ‐ OHACompliance@oha.org ‐ 808‐594‐0227 ‐ electronic mail and regular mail 2 Exclusions: The Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) is not interested in reviewing TCNS projects that involve the replacement of exisƟng structures on rooŌops or buildings; the installaƟon of new structures on rooŌops or buildings; or, projects that do not involve ground disturbing work. The noƟﬁcaƟon that you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The informaƟon was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their informaƟon and planning. You need make no effort at this Ɵme to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this noƟﬁcaƟon. Prior to construcƟon, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic PreservaƟon Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to SecƟon VII.A of the NPA unless the project is excluded from SHPO review under SecƟon III D or E of the NPA. 2. Chairperson Suzanne D Case ‐ Department of Land & Natural Resources ‐ 1151 Punchbowl Street ‐ Room 220 Honolulu, HI ‐ suzanne.case@hawaii.gov; Russell.Y.Tsuji@hawaii.gov ‐ 808‐587‐0401 ‐ electronic mail 3. Deputy SHPO Theresa K Donham ‐ State Historic PreservaƟon Office (Hawaii) ‐ 601 Kamokila Blvd Room 555 Kapolei, HI ‐ theresa.k.donham@hawaii.gov ‐ 808‐692‐8015 ‐ electronic mail TCNS automaƟcally forwards all noƟﬁcaƟons to all Tribal NaƟons and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal for PTC wayside poles falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any addiƟonal process with that Tribal NaƟon or SHPO. In addiƟon, a parƟcular Tribal NaƟon or SHPO may also set forth policies or procedures within its details box that exclude from review certain faciliƟes (for example, a statement that it does not review collocaƟons with no ground disturbance; or that indicates that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in parƟcipaƟng in pre‐construcƟon review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above have opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail noƟﬁcaƟon. If you learn that any of the above contact informaƟon is no longer valid, please contact the FCC by emailing tcnshelp@fcc.gov. The following informaƟon relaƟng to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: NoƟﬁcaƟon Received: 01/29/2024 NoƟﬁcaƟon ID: 275983 Excluded from SHPO Review: No Tower Owner Individual or EnƟty Name: Crown Castle Consultant Name: Crystal Macklin Street Address: 1515 Des Peres Rd. Ste 200 Suite 200 City: St. Louis State: MISSOURI Zip Code: 63131 Phone: 314‐997‐6111 Email: tribal@trileaf.com 3 Structure Type: MTOWER ‐ Monopole LaƟtude: 19 deg 43 min 2.5 sec N Longitude: 155 deg 55 min 23.0 sec W LocaƟon DescripƟon: 73‐4310 Huehue Street City: Kailua‐Kona State: HAWAII County: HAWAII Detailed DescripƟon of Project: Our client proposes to replace an exisƟng 73'6" wooden pole (overall height 76'11") w/ a new 73'6" monopole w/ an overall height of 75'. New monopole & new associated equip. will be installed w/in an exisƟng 30'x29'1" lease area. Ground ElevaƟon: 1511.0 meters Support Structure: 22.4 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 22.9 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 1533.9 meters above mean sea level If you have any quesƟons or comments regarding this noƟce, please contact the FCC using the electronic Help Request form located on the FCC's website at: hƩps://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=hƩps‐3A__www.fcc.gov_wireless_available‐2Dsupport‐ 2Dservices&d=DwIFaQ&c=euGZstcaTDllvimEN8b7jXrwqOf‐ v5A_CdpgnVﬁiMM&r=tVy9dfE6fJUkHc15_Itk39MNoGtgWe1vmeedh3_FbFk&m=SJr4rVzshrKNUvTap6REz9VT8UruzzsiOlj Nv‐6ZP9I4wtKgzLpyPHJ‐khTg3hsr&s=02sjxyHIUVdmX‐xXJde9lPmEqRcL2N_btzYcEdsnUt0&e= You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480‐3201 (TTY 717‐338‐2824). Hours are from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal CommunicaƟons Commission ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint EssenƟals. Visit the following link to report this email as spam: hƩps://us1.proofpointessenƟals.com/app/report_spam.php?mod_id=11&mod_opƟon=logitem&report=1&type=easysp am&k=k1&payload=53616c7465645f5f255f8f55643c4a5e1ce189588117a381ad35b071a73d4d1527d5840c8b15319591 38b172f92fc3364699a79b29c46390315ab2d7101caefd5cc8592ef05edb31cee92050043cc33524bdf410969958338c979c 7221a51cdfcff64613ed559b39a0c9e542facbac34e50906bd5c05d34acba28cfa1d3e2cb3365c99f051186191f86bb3c0c86 722825b9f22fed17e924f4c61ed89a3a015ff March 28, 2024 Office of Hawaiian Affairs Mr. Kai Markell 560 N. Nimitz Highway Suite 200 Honolulu, HI 96817 RE: Crown Castle Trileaf Project # 735423 / 824947 / Kaloko Mauka 73-4310 Huehue Street, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii County, HI 96740 Latitude: 19° 43’ 2.54” N, Longitude: 155° 55’ 22.97” W TCNS # 275983 Dear Mr. Markell: This project was originally submitted in TCNS on 2/2/2024. Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the above referenced property. Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on, or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that is listed or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on, or within the viewshed of an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf has learned your tribe has an interest in property located within this County. Our client proposes to replace an existing 73-foot 6-inch wooden pole (overall height of 76 feet 11 inches) with a proposed 73-foot 6-inch monopole with an overall height of 75 feet. The new monopole and proposed associated equipment will be installed within the existing 30-foot by 29-foot 1-inch fenced compound lease area. There is no proposed ground disturbance outside of the existing lease area. This site is surrounded by a forest. The form 620/621 submission packet is attached for your review. Please let us know if you have any objections or comments on this project as soon as possible. Contact me at (314) 997-6111 or email tribal@trileaf.com if you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Crystal L. Macklin Tribal Consultation Manager 1515 Des Peres Road, Suite 200, Saint Louis, Missouri 63131 - 314.997.6111 www.trileaf.com From:Kamakana Ferreira To:Tribal Subject:RE: TCNS # 275983 - Office of Hawaiian Affairs - For Review Date:Tuesday, April 9, 2024 7:00:36 PM Attachments:image001.png CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you for sending the full submittal packet over to the Office of Hawaiian Affairs (OHA) pursuant to our request for information on February 6 via the FCC TCNS website. We now have enough information to conclude that we have no concerns regarding this project. Given the height of the project above sea level and a lack of historic properties being found above 2400 feet, OHA agrees that there is little chance of encountering subsurface deposits. Mahalo, Kamakana C. Ferreira, M.A. Lead Compliance Specialist Office of Hawaiian Affairs 560 N. Nimitz Hwy Honolulu, Hi. 96817 (808)594-0227 From: Tribal <tribal@trileaf.com> Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2024 5:44 AM To: OHACompliance @oha.org <OHACompliance@oha.org> Subject: TCNS # 275983 - Office of Hawaiian Affairs - For Review Hello, Please find attached the information regarding the above project. Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns as soon as possible. Thank you, Crystal Macklin Tribal Consultation Manager 1515 Des Peres Rd, Suite 200 St. Louis, MO 63131 Office: (314) 997-6111, ext. 243 This email has been scanned for spam and viruses by Proofpoint Essentials. Click here toreport this email as spam. Appendix G Resumes AMANDA WRONA PROJECT SCIENTIST Education Biological Sciences, B. S. Arizona State University / Tempe, AZ Areas of Expertise Ms. Amanda Wrona has experience performing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews for wireless telecommunications projects. Environmental service expertise includes: Information Section 7 Consultation National Wetland Inventory Maps Flood Insurance Rate Maps Critical Habitat Maps Soil Characterization Field Reconnaissance Section 106 Compliance NEPA Environmental Assessments Form 620/621 Submittals Local Government Consultation Native American Consultation Professional Resume EMILY V. SENNE PROJECT MANAGER Education B.S. Biology / Emphasis Marine and Freshwater Ecology. University of Wisconsin - Whitewater / Whitewater, WI Areas of Expertise Ms. Senne has experience performing site inspections and conducting environmental due diligence pursuant to EPA All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) and the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM), as well as performing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Programmatic Agreement (NPA) reviews for commercial real estate, lending, and wireless telecommunications projects. Ms. Moss operates as the primary point-of-contact for clients over a large geography, specializing within the Western Region of the United States. Environmental service expertise includes: Archaeological and Architectural Impacts Critical Habitat Maps Environmental Evaluation Summaries Field Reconnaissance Flood Insurance Rate Maps Form 620/621 Submittals Historical City Directories Historical Topographic Maps and Aerial Imagery Indoor Air Quality Assessments Informal Section 7 Consultation Land Use History Local Government Consultation Migratory Bird Evaluations Mold and Lead-Based Paint Surveys National Wetlands Inventory Maps Native American Consultation NEPA Environmental Assessments Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Preliminary Risk Assessments Records Search with Risk Assessment (RSRA) Section 106 Compliance Soil and Groundwater Management Plans Soil Characterization Vendor Management Certifications/Affiliations Adult Child Infant CARE CPR & First Aid Certification ANSI/FCC RF Radiation Safety Competent Person Environmental Professional (EP) as defined by ASTM Standard E1527-21 (AAI) Professional Resume William P. Kenai Mayor Wes! Hawai'i Office 74-5044 Anc Kcohokalole HwyKailua-Kona, Hawai'i 96740 Phone (808) 323-4770 Fax 1808) 327-3563 June 13, 2013 Christina Perez The LYLE Company County of Hawai'i PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3140 Gold Camp Drive Suite 30 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 RE: Request for Zoning Verification for Telecommunication Antenna Tax Map Key ("TMK"): (3) 7-3-048:003; COR 13-084648 Dear Christina Perez: Duane Kanuha o;rec/()1' Bobby Command Deputy Director fast Hawai 'i Office IO 1 Pauahi Street. Suite 3 Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Phone (808) 961-8288 Fax (808) 961-8742 This letter is in response to your e-mail dated April 11, 2013 requesting zoning verification for a Telecommunications Antenna. The subject property is zoned by Hawai 'i County as Agricultural 20 acres (A-20a) and is located within the State Land Use "Agricultural" District. The A-20a zone is subject to possible changes by the Hawai 'i County Council but does not have an automatic time for expiration. Please see Hawai'i County Code (HCC) Section 25-4-12 for the section referring to Telecommunication Antennas & Towers. The zoning code is Chapter 25 which can be found at www.cohplanningdepartment.com Final Plan Approval was granted by the Planning Director on April 2, 1997, which approved the Telecommunication Antenna. The existing Telecommunication Antenna is a legal use and is considered a Nonconforming Use of the subject property pursuant to Section 25-4-6 l(a) of the HCC. Prior to 2007, Hawai 'i County allowed the construction and operation of wireless communication antennas and towers on State Land Use Agricultural Districts lands with a Special Permit. In 2007, the Hawai 'i State Legislature adopted Act 171, which allowed wireless communication antennas and towers to be permitted uses in the State Land Use Agricultural District with no Special Permit required by the County Planning Commission. In 2010, the Hawai 'i County Council adopted Ordinance l 0-17, which allows a telecommunication antenna or tower in the County Agricultural District if a Use Permit is first granted by the County Planning Commission. The installation of additional antennas or equipment upon the existing tower within its existing building envelope may be permitted, provided that such additions are first reviewed and approved by this office through Plan Approval. Any contemplated expansion of the pole and its support facility may require the issuance of a Use Permit from the Planning Commission. f/awai'i Count.r is an Equal Opp011u11ity I'nJl'ider and Employer Christina Perez June 13, 2013 Page 2 of 2 Copies of the Final Plan approval can be obtained at a cost of$1.00 for the 1 S`page and$0.10 for each additional page for each new document. You will need to make arrangements with a copy company if you need copies of materials such as site plans which are larger than 11"X 17". Please contact the Building Division at (808) 323-4720 for the Certiticate of Occupancy and final inspections. In order for the Planning Director to determine compliance with current roning regulations, a site plan prepared by a licensed surveyor would need to be submitted, which shows the location and use of all existing structures on the property. The Planning Department does not have any record of citations issued for violations of the Hawai'i County Zoning code for the subject parcel. Previous building permits issued for the subject parcel would have been required to be in compliance with height restrictions, setback requirements, landscaping and parking requirements at time of issuance. If you have any further questions about this matter, please contact Mark Taylor at the West Hawai`i office at (808) 323-4784. Sincerely, N K N HA anning Director MJT:mjt Coh21\planning_kona\SiafnMark zoning veritication vs 2\73048003[elecommunication.doc Cc: West Hawai`i Office JOSH GREEN, M.D. GOVERNOR OF HAWAII KE KIA'AINA OKA MOKU'AINA O HAWAl'I MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: October 18, 2024 Mr. Zenda Kem STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH P.O. BOX916 HILO, HAWAII 96721-0916 Planning Director, County of Hawaii FROM: Eric Honda District Environmental Health Program Chief SUBJECT: Use Permit Application (PL-USE-2024-000029) Applicant: Crown Castle KENNETH S. FINK, M.D, MGA, MPH DI RECTOR OF HEAL TH KA LUNA HO'OKELE Request: To Allow an Upgrade to an Existing Telecommunication Facility, Including Replacement of an Existing 73'-6" Wood Pole with a New 73 '-6" Steel Monopole and Equipment Compound Tax Map Key: (3) 7-3-048:003 (par.) North Kana, Hawai'i In most cases, the District Health Office will no longer provide individual comments to agencies or project owners to expedite the land use review and process. Agencies, project owners, and their agents should apply Department of Health "Standard Comments" regarding land use to their standard project comments in their submittal. Standard comments can be found on the Land Use Planning Review section of the Department of Heal th website: https ://heal th.hawaii. gov/ epo/landuse/. Contact information for each Branch/Office is available on that website. Note: Agencies and project owners are responsible for adhering to all applicable standard comments and obtaining proper and necessary permits before the commencement of any work. General summary comments have been included for your convenience. However, these comments are not all-inclusive and do not substitute for review of and compliance with all applicable standard comments for the various DOH individual programs. Clean Air Branch 1.All project activities shall comply with the Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR),