Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-12-16 Dana G Moss From: Limu Moss To: LPCtestimonv Subject: Testimonial About 5G 100" From My House Date: Monday, December 16,2024 3:59:48 PM Dana G. Moss 53-4036 hiwahiwa Place Kapaau HI 96755 808 865 8206 rest zOvb@hawaiiantel.net Please do not allow any 5G technology to be added to Hawaii Island communications system until the FCC implements the changes to the guidelines. Ordered by a federal court case brought forward by Childrens Health Defense. childrenshealthdefense.org We won! The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit published its decision Aug.13, 2021 where it ruled that the FCC failed to consider the non-cancer evidence regarding adverse health effects of wireless technology when it decided that its 1996 radiofrequency emission guidelines protect the public's health. The Court ruled: "The case be remanded to the commission to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that its guidelines adequately protect against harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation... COURT JUDGEMENT United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued January 25, 2021 Decided August 13, 2021 No. 20-1025 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST, ET AL., Consolidated with 20-1138 CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, ET AL PETITIONERS V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS On Petitions for Review of an Order of the Federal Communications Commission Edward Myers, Attorney for Environmental Health Trust Petitioners: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. & Scott W. McCollough, Attorneys for Children's Health Defense Petitioners: According to the Court's decision, the FCC failed to provide evidence to support its decision in regard to the non-cancer health effects and that it also failed to respond to the extensive evidence that was filed with the FCC (via the docket which is also called "record") that shows that the current radiofrequency emissions guidelines may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer. The court stated that, the FCC's failure, undermines the Commission's conclusions regarding the adequacy of its testing procedures, particularly as they relate to children, and its conclusions regarding the implications of long-term exposure to RF radiation, exposure to RF pulsation or modulation, and the effects of wireless technologies that were developed since 1996. The court also found that the FCC 2019 decision was arbitrary and capricious in its failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation. The court's decision continued to say: "...the FCC completely failed to acknowledge, let alone respond to, comments concerning the impact of RF radiation on the environment...The record contains substantive evidence of potential environmental harms." Government Failed to Consider Evidence of Harm, Including to Children, From 5G and Wireless Radiation, Court Rules In a recent landmark ruling in a case brought by Children's Health Defense against the Federal Communications Commission, the court ruled the commission's 1996 health guidelines related to non-cancer harms from 5G and wireless-based technologies were capricious, arbitrary and not evidence-based. by Dafna Tachover, Esa August 18, 2021 ESS 22 Comments A recent landmark court ruling in a case brought by Children's Health Defense (CHD) against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) should concern anyone who uses wireless technology (cell phones, Watches and Wi-Fi), especially parents of children who use these devices. On Aug. 13, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled the FCC's 2019 decision that its 1996 guidelines adequately protect the public from non-cancer harms from 5G and wireless-based technologies was capricious, arbitrary and not evidence- based. In 2019, after an alleged six-year review of the science on the potential harms of 5G and wireless technology, the FCC concluded the evidence showed no harm and therefore its 1996 guidelines are sufficient to protect the public and no review of the guidelines was warranted. In the U.S., as long as a wireless-based technology complies with FCC guidelines, it is considered safe, and no lawsuit can be filed for injuries. However, CHD's case revealed that while the FCC has been pushing 5G and forcing Wi-Fi-based technologies on our children, the safety assurances made by the FCC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are not supported by evidence. As the court's ruling indicates, the contrary is true.