HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-11-01 C.S. Jenkins Testimony From: Susie J.
To: W PCtesti mono
Subject: Subject:Testimony On Hawaii General Plan 2045(New Biz)
Date: Friday, November 1,2024 3:52:26 PM
Subject: Testimony On Hawaii General Plan 2045 (New Biz)
This General Plan needs to be thrown out and redone!
This sounds too much like the WEF, The WHO, & United Nations plans to rule the
world.
• It is too vague. The language is not clear what the plan wishes to accomplish.
There are MANY concerning sections that sound like rights, freedoms, and
property are at risk with this plan.
• Page 111 , section 17.4: "Land use application shall identifyas early as possible
any existing or potential active living corridors that should be incorporated into
the counties open space network."This sounds like you'll be looking at people's
property to take for open space because they apply for land use. That is not
Pono and is an invasion of privacy!
• 2.2 Biocultural Stewardship Goal (1 .13)- 'Incentiveprivate land management
practices that enhance natural resources and values and when
appropriate pursue the acquisitions of lands for the protections of natural
resources."We've seen your incentives like the tax incentives on Maui, which is
costing people thousands if they don't do what the government wants. You want
to acquire land to protect natural resources and values. Who gets to decide
what are natural resources and values? Whose values are they? Why do you
think it's your right to "pursue" acquiring someone's private property?!!
• You have an entire section on climate change that looks to take away many
freedoms and rights. Did you know there are close to 2K credentialed scientists
from around the world that state there is no climate
danger? nttps://clintel.org/world-climate-declaration/ The reason for this
narrative is the change these policies will create will increase the pocket book
of investors in renewable energy as it reduces freedoms for the general
population.
• Page 116, 19.7: "Concurrency reviews should incorporate reduction in vehicle
miles traveled to mitigate traffic impacts and achieve sustainability
and demand management goals."The Constitution says we have the right to
travel! It is not the right of the Planning department to "demand" that your
management goals reduce that right! Anything that reads, "Reduce vehicle
miles traveled" should be removed from this plan!
C.S. Jenkins