Laserfiche WebLink
From: Akuakea <br /> To: LPCtestimonv;WPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Kevin Hill testimony <br /> Date: Thursday, November 21,2024 11:05:36 PM <br /> I'm writing to address a major concern about certain assumptions that are stated and that much <br /> of the plan is based on but are problematic at best, but worse are perhaps outright false and <br /> misleading. <br /> My issues today are the presumption that we mean the same thing when we discuss <br /> "sustainability" and that we agree about"climate change" and its inherent presumptions <br /> especially that co2 is a poluntant, that man is the largest cause of this climate change (by <br /> breathing and burning of fossil fuels etc). Several points on this: <br /> 1. When Al Gore popularized that we were going to be extinct by the year 2000 he used the <br /> term "global warming". Now we talk about"climate change"! To make a crisis out of <br /> "climate change"is circular logic and deceptive at its core. If it gets warmer it's a crisis. If it <br /> gets colder it's a crisis and the presumption carry's that it's man's fault by exhaling co2. <br /> Simply existing and breathing is problematic and justifies open conversation about efforts to <br /> reduce the population! We used to think that it was immoral to plot ways to reduce <br /> population because of the sacredness of life now it's normal every day conversation. <br /> 2. Many of the thousands of intelligent people who have debunked these presumptions point <br /> out that to blame humans for the changes in climate ignores major factors that have massive <br /> influence on weather and climate -two of which are solar activity (proximity and intensity of <br /> the sun and its changing position and intensity over time) and the irrefutable fact of man's <br /> manipulation of weather. <br /> Please educate yourselves if this challenge is new to you as this general plan assumes that <br /> these arguements are settled and closed in favor of a deceptive and destructive worldview. <br /> Here are a couple of sites that are loaded with irrefutable proof of man's preoccupation not <br /> only with modifying the weather but weaponizing it using technologies that are being pushed <br /> strongly in our own neighborhoods right now. <br /> A. Weatherm odi fi cti onhi story.com. Well written summaries of the history of weather <br /> modification since 1946 and tremendous resources to patents, DOD publications,public <br /> hearings before congress in 2015 that addresses Chem trails and creation of high altitude <br /> clouds etc. <br /> B. Geoengineeringwatch.org. Site loaded with information on the topic, soil samples water <br /> samples, air samples that show the aluminum, barium and strontium aerosolized metals <br /> affecting the air we breathe, the water we drink and the soil in which we raise our crops and <br /> feed our animals. Well done site with enormous amounts of data assembled by a retired <br /> engineer. <br /> C. Library.NOAA.gov -this site shows those who REPORT their weather modification <br /> activities... the most impactive ones that we see in the news are NOT voluntarily listed! A <br /> few minutes here will show how common and readily available information is of man's <br /> manipulation of weather. It's not all evil... but some of it absolutely is and you see it on the <br /> news every month. <br /> The world meteorological organization reports at least 50 countries are regularly using <br /> weather modification technologies. Russia and China and the US have all made public <br /> statements of their ability to use weather weapons in warfare. <br /> The technologies involve sending the atmosphere with aerosolized chemicals that then can be <br /> influence by land based frequencies to create, amplify and steer weather- hurricane, tornados, <br />