Laserfiche WebLink
From: Josh Moody <br /> To: WPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Reject GP 2045 Keep GP 2005 <br /> Date: Sunday,November 3,2024 10:23:51 PM <br /> Dear Windward Planning Commission- <br /> Lets please discard GP 2045 at this time. The document is far too simple and vague to move forward without <br /> additional work to clarify terms with regard to property lights.The GP 2005 document by comparison has a more <br /> complete definition of terms for land and specific uses like farms,private property,and private property rights. <br /> I would say that the general public and the county needs more transparency before we can pass any plan,but a good <br /> start would be to rework failures like page I I I section 17.4"Land use application shall identify as early as possible <br /> any existing potential active living corridors that should be incorporated into the counties open space network." <br /> As written this appears to be language authorizing land appropriation for conversion into"open space"-needs <br /> clarification to read,"in no way will affect private land ownership or re-zoning of current acreage lands or <br /> residentially zoned areas." <br /> Remove Page 116, 19.7: "Concurrency reviews should incorporate reduction in vehicle miles traveled to mitigate <br /> traffic impacts and achieve sustainability and demand management goals." The Constitution says we have the light <br /> to travel! It is not the right of the Planning department to"demand"that your management goals reduce that light! <br /> Anything that reads, "Reduce vehicle miles traveled" should be removed from this plan. <br /> Please expect oversight on any attempts to limit lights and freedoms in your planning moving forward. Most likely <br /> these attempts would fail at the Federal level when challenged.None of the counties in Hawaii should expect to <br /> waste taxpayer dollars to fight unconstitutional and radical agendas doomed to failure for rushed and poorly worked <br /> language. <br /> Lastly I would ask you to consider the consequences of enacting this legislation for yourselves personally.All US <br /> citizens work to provide for ourselves and our families.Private property rights are generally the main goal,a source <br /> of personal pride,and the reason we work.Your civic responsbility needs to identify the effect of your actions <br /> within the planning commission. <br /> Mahalo for your time and thank you in advance for your rejection of General Plan 245.Please edit to confirm land <br /> rights protections for private land owers and residentail owners and with freedom of movement provisions protected. <br /> Josh Moody <br />